Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of total other earnings from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 36.

Rejected response: 13.

Question: what was the change in millions of total other earnings from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 36

( millions ) the other of 2010 is 69 ; the other of 2009 is 74 ; the other of 2008 is 61 ;

( millions ) the total of 2010 is $ 214 ; the total of 2009 is $ 178 ; the total of 2008 is $ 165 ;

Answer: 36

Question: what was the change in millions of total other earnings from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: 13

Answer: 13


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in free cash flow from 2011 to 2012 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -535.

Rejected response: 502.

UNP || what was the change in free cash flow <TIME> , in millions?

Question: what was the change in free cash flow from 2011 to 2012 , in millions?

Answer: -535

millions the free cash flow of 2012 is $ 1382 ; the free cash flow of 2011 is $ 1917 ; the free cash flow of 2010 is $ 1415 ;

the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2012 2011 2010 .

free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .

millions the cash provided by operating activities of 2012 is $ 6161 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 5873 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2010 is $ 4105 ;

millions the cash used in investing activities of 2012 is -3633 ( 3633 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2011 is -3119 ( 3119 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2010 is -2488 ( 2488 ) ;

Answer: -535

Question: what was the change in free cash flow from 2010 to 2011 , in millions?

Answer: 502

Answer: 502

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in free cash flow from 2010 to 2011 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 502.

Rejected response: -535.

Question: what was the change in free cash flow from 2010 to 2011 , in millions?

Answer: 502

millions the cash provided by operating activities of 2012 is $ 6161 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 5873 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2010 is $ 4105 ;

millions the cash used in investing activities of 2012 is -3633 ( 3633 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2011 is -3119 ( 3119 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2010 is -2488 ( 2488 ) ;

millions the free cash flow of 2012 is $ 1382 ; the free cash flow of 2011 is $ 1917 ; the free cash flow of 2010 is $ 1415 ;

Answer: 502

Question: what was the change in free cash flow from 2011 to 2012 , in millions?

Answer: -535

Answer: -535


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the roi of an investment in nasdaq composite index from march 2006 to march 2009?
Reference time interval: 2006-03-01 00:00:00 to 2009-04-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -34.7%.

Rejected response: 36.3%.

ABMD || what is the roi of an investment in nasdaq composite index <TIME>?

Question: what is the roi of an investment in nasdaq composite index from march 2006 to march 2009?

Answer: -34.7%

the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2006 is 100 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2007 is 103.50 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2008 is 97.41 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2009 is 65.33 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2010 is 102.49 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2011 is 118.86 ;

the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2006 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s .

performance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s .

the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2006 is 100 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2007 is 88.78 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2008 is 84.26 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2009 is 46.12 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2010 is 83.47 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2011 is 91.35 ;

Answer: -34.7%

Question: what is the roi of an investment in nasdaq composite index from march 2010 to march 2013?

Answer: 36.3%

the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2010 is 100 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2011 is 115.98 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2012 is 128.93 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2013 is 136.26 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2014 is 175.11 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2015 is 204.38 ;

the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2010 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s .

the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2010 is 100 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2011 is 108.31 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2012 is 115.05 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2013 is 105.56 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2014 is 123.18 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2015 is 118.95 ;

Answer: 36.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the roi of an investment in nasdaq composite index from march 2010 to march 2013?
Reference time interval: 2010-03-01 00:00:00 to 2013-04-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 36.3%.

Rejected response: -34.7%.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in nasdaq composite index from march 2010 to march 2013?

Answer: 36.3%

the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2010 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s .

the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2010 is 100 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2011 is 115.98 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2012 is 128.93 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2013 is 136.26 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2014 is 175.11 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2015 is 204.38 ;

the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2010 is 100 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2011 is 108.31 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2012 is 115.05 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2013 is 105.56 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2014 is 123.18 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2015 is 118.95 ;

Answer: 36.3%

Question: what is the roi of an investment in nasdaq composite index from march 2006 to march 2009?

Answer: -34.7%

the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2006 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s .

the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2006 is 100 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2007 is 103.50 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2008 is 97.41 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2009 is 65.33 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2010 is 102.49 ; the nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2011 is 118.86 ;

the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2006 is 100 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2007 is 88.78 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2008 is 84.26 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2009 is 46.12 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2010 is 83.47 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2011 is 91.35 ;

Answer: -34.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total other income was rental income in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 59%.

Rejected response: 70%.

UNP || what percent of total other income was rental income <TIME>?

Question: what percent of total other income was rental income in 2007?

Answer: 59%

millions of dollars the rental income of 2007 is $ 68 ; the rental income of 2006 is $ 83 ; the rental income of 2005 is $ 59 ;

millions of dollars the total of 2007 is $ 116 ; the total of 2006 is $ 118 ; the total of 2005 is $ 145 ;

millions of dollars The interest income of 2007 is 50 ; The interest income of 2006 is 29 ; The interest income of 2005 is 17 ;

millions of dollars the interest income of 2007 is 50 ; the interest income of 2006 is 29 ; the interest income of 2005 is 17 ;

Answer: 59%

Question: what percent of total other income was rental income in 2006?

Answer: 70%

other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2007 2006 2005 .

Answer: 70%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total other income was rental income in 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 70%.

Rejected response: 59%.

Question: what percent of total other income was rental income in 2006?

Answer: 70%

other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2007 2006 2005 .

millions of dollars the rental income of 2007 is $ 68 ; the rental income of 2006 is $ 83 ; the rental income of 2005 is $ 59 ;

millions of dollars the total of 2007 is $ 116 ; the total of 2006 is $ 118 ; the total of 2005 is $ 145 ;

Answer: 70%

Question: what percent of total other income was rental income in 2007?

Answer: 59%

millions of dollars the interest income of 2007 is 50 ; the interest income of 2006 is 29 ; the interest income of 2005 is 17 ;

Answer: 59%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in research and development net in millions from 2017 to 2018?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -10.

Rejected response: -2.

PPG || what was the change in research and development net in millions <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in research and development net in millions from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: -10

( $ in millions ) the research and development net of 2018 is $ 441 ; the research and development net of 2017 is $ 451 ; the research and development net of 2016 is $ 453 ;

( $ in millions ) The research and development 2013 total of 2018 is $ 464 ; The research and development 2013 total of 2017 is $ 472 ; The research and development 2013 total of 2016 is $ 473 ;

research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred. .

actual outcomes could differ from those estimates .

( $ in millions ) the research and development 2013 total of 2018 is $ 464 ; the research and development 2013 total of 2017 is $ 472 ; the research and development 2013 total of 2016 is $ 473 ;

Answer: -10

Question: what was the change in research and development net in millions from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -2

( $ in millions ) The less depreciation on research facilities of 2018 is 23 ; The less depreciation on research facilities of 2017 is 21 ; The less depreciation on research facilities of 2016 is 20 ;

Answer: -2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in research and development net in millions from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2.

Rejected response: -10.

Question: what was the change in research and development net in millions from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -2

actual outcomes could differ from those estimates .

( $ in millions ) the research and development 2013 total of 2018 is $ 464 ; the research and development 2013 total of 2017 is $ 472 ; the research and development 2013 total of 2016 is $ 473 ;

( $ in millions ) the research and development net of 2018 is $ 441 ; the research and development net of 2017 is $ 451 ; the research and development net of 2016 is $ 453 ;

Answer: -2

Question: what was the change in research and development net in millions from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: -10

Answer: -10


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of cash provided by operating activities were dividends paid in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 19%.

Rejected response: 20%.

UNP || what percentage of cash provided by operating activities were dividends paid <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of cash provided by operating activities were dividends paid in 2012?

Answer: 19%

Explanation: looking to see what kind of cash coverage the firm has to pay its dividend from its operations .

millions the cash provided by operating activities of 2013 is $ 6823 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2012 is $ 6161 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 5873 ;

millions the dividends paid of 2013 is -1333 ( 1333 ) ; the dividends paid of 2012 is -1146 ( 1146 ) ; the dividends paid of 2011 is -837 ( 837 ) ;

free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid .

millions the cash used in investing activities of 2013 is -3405 ( 3405 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2012 is -3633 ( 3633 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2011 is -3119 ( 3119 ) ;

Answer: 19%

Question: what percentage of cash provided by operating activities were dividends paid in 2013?

Answer: 20%

Answer: 20%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of cash provided by operating activities were dividends paid in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 20%.

Rejected response: 19%.

Question: what percentage of cash provided by operating activities were dividends paid in 2013?

Answer: 20%

millions the cash provided by operating activities of 2013 is $ 6823 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2012 is $ 6161 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 5873 ;

millions the cash used in investing activities of 2013 is -3405 ( 3405 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2012 is -3633 ( 3633 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2011 is -3119 ( 3119 ) ;

millions the dividends paid of 2013 is -1333 ( 1333 ) ; the dividends paid of 2012 is -1146 ( 1146 ) ; the dividends paid of 2011 is -837 ( 837 ) ;

Answer: 20%

Question: what percentage of cash provided by operating activities were dividends paid in 2012?

Answer: 19%

Explanation: looking to see what kind of cash coverage the firm has to pay its dividend from its operations .

Answer: 19%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what portion of total multi-asset is related to target date/risk as of december 31 , 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 32.7%.

Rejected response: 48.4%.

BLK || what portion of total multi-asset is related to target date/risk as of december 31 , <TIME>?

Question: what portion of total multi-asset is related to target date/risk as of december 31 , 2013?

Answer: 32.7%

( in millions ) the target date/risk of december 31 2013 is 111408 ; the target date/risk of net inflows ( outflows ) is 10992 ; the target date/risk of market change is 7083 ; the target date/risk of fx impact is -872 ( 872 ) ; the target date/risk of december 31 2014 is 128611 ;

( in millions ) the multi-asset of december 31 2013 is $ 341214 ; the multi-asset of net inflows ( outflows ) is $ 28905 ; the multi-asset of market change is $ 21044 ; the multi-asset of fx impact is $ -13326 ( 13326 ) ; the multi-asset of december 31 2014 is $ 377837 ;

( in millions ) december 31 , 2013 net inflows ( outflows ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2014 .

Answer: 32.7%

Question: what portion of total multi-asset is related to target date/risk as of december 31 , 2014?

Answer: 48.4%

( in millions ) the asset allocation and balanced of december 31 2013 is $ 169604 ; the asset allocation and balanced of net inflows ( outflows ) is $ 18387 ; the asset allocation and balanced of market change is $ -827 ( 827 ) ; the asset allocation and balanced of fx impact is $ -4132 ( 4132 ) ; the asset allocation and balanced of december 31 2014 is $ 183032 ;

Answer: 48.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what portion of total multi-asset is related to target date/risk as of december 31 , 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 48.4%.

Rejected response: 32.7%.

Question: what portion of total multi-asset is related to target date/risk as of december 31 , 2014?

Answer: 48.4%

( in millions ) the asset allocation and balanced of december 31 2013 is $ 169604 ; the asset allocation and balanced of net inflows ( outflows ) is $ 18387 ; the asset allocation and balanced of market change is $ -827 ( 827 ) ; the asset allocation and balanced of fx impact is $ -4132 ( 4132 ) ; the asset allocation and balanced of december 31 2014 is $ 183032 ;

( in millions ) the target date/risk of december 31 2013 is 111408 ; the target date/risk of net inflows ( outflows ) is 10992 ; the target date/risk of market change is 7083 ; the target date/risk of fx impact is -872 ( 872 ) ; the target date/risk of december 31 2014 is 128611 ;

( in millions ) the multi-asset of december 31 2013 is $ 341214 ; the multi-asset of net inflows ( outflows ) is $ 28905 ; the multi-asset of market change is $ 21044 ; the multi-asset of fx impact is $ -13326 ( 13326 ) ; the multi-asset of december 31 2014 is $ 377837 ;

Answer: 48.4%

Question: what portion of total multi-asset is related to target date/risk as of december 31 , 2013?

Answer: 32.7%

( in millions ) december 31 , 2013 net inflows ( outflows ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2014 .

Answer: 32.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the net change in other income from 2004 to 2005 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -27.

Rejected response: 57.

UNP || what was the net change in other income <TIME> in millions?

Question: what was the net change in other income from 2004 to 2005 in millions?

Answer: -27

millions of dollars the other income of 2006 is $ 118 ; the other income of 2005 is $ 145 ; the other income of 2004 is $ 88 ; the other income of % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 is ( 19 ) % ( % ) ; the other income of % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 is 65% ( 65 % ) ;

non-operating items millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 % (  % ) change 2006 v 2005 % (  % ) change 2005 v 2004 .

millions of dollars The income taxes of 2006 is -919 ( 919 ) ; The income taxes of 2005 is -410 ( 410 ) ; The income taxes of 2004 is -252 ( 252 ) ; The income taxes of % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 is 124 ; The income taxes of % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 is 63 ;

millions of dollars the interest expense of 2006 is -477 ( 477 ) ; the interest expense of 2005 is -504 ( 504 ) ; the interest expense of 2004 is -527 ( 527 ) ; the interest expense of % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 is -5 ( 5 ) ; the interest expense of % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 is -4 ( 4 ) ;

millions of dollars the income taxes of 2006 is -919 ( 919 ) ; the income taxes of 2005 is -410 ( 410 ) ; the income taxes of 2004 is -252 ( 252 ) ; the income taxes of % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 is 124 ; the income taxes of % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 is 63 ;

Answer: -27

Question: what was the net change in other income from 2004 to 2005 in millions?

Answer: 57

Answer: 57


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the net change in other income from 2004 to 2005 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 57.

Rejected response: -27.

Question: what was the net change in other income from 2004 to 2005 in millions?

Answer: 57

millions of dollars the other income of 2006 is $ 118 ; the other income of 2005 is $ 145 ; the other income of 2004 is $ 88 ; the other income of % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 is ( 19 ) % ( % ) ; the other income of % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 is 65% ( 65 % ) ;

millions of dollars the interest expense of 2006 is -477 ( 477 ) ; the interest expense of 2005 is -504 ( 504 ) ; the interest expense of 2004 is -527 ( 527 ) ; the interest expense of % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 is -5 ( 5 ) ; the interest expense of % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 is -4 ( 4 ) ;

millions of dollars the income taxes of 2006 is -919 ( 919 ) ; the income taxes of 2005 is -410 ( 410 ) ; the income taxes of 2004 is -252 ( 252 ) ; the income taxes of % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 is 124 ; the income taxes of % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 is 63 ;

Answer: 57

Question: what was the net change in other income from 2004 to 2005 in millions?

Answer: -27

Answer: -27


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in research and development 2013 total from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1%.

Rejected response: 6%.

PPG || what was the percentage change in research and development <TIME> total <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in research and development 2013 total from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -1%

( $ in millions ) the research and development 2013 total of 2015 is $ 505 ; the research and development 2013 total of 2014 is $ 509 ; the research and development 2013 total of 2013 is $ 479 ;

( $ in millions ) The research and development net of 2015 is $ 486 ; The research and development net of 2014 is $ 492 ; The research and development net of 2013 is $ 463 ;

( $ in millions ) the research and development net of 2015 is $ 486 ; the research and development net of 2014 is $ 492 ; the research and development net of 2013 is $ 463 ;

marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .

Answer: -1%

Question: what was the percentage change in research and development 2013 total from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 6%

Answer: 6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in research and development 2013 total from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6%.

Rejected response: -1%.

Question: what was the percentage change in research and development 2013 total from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 6%

( $ in millions ) the research and development 2013 total of 2015 is $ 505 ; the research and development 2013 total of 2014 is $ 509 ; the research and development 2013 total of 2013 is $ 479 ;

( $ in millions ) the research and development net of 2015 is $ 486 ; the research and development net of 2014 is $ 492 ; the research and development net of 2013 is $ 463 ;

marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .

Answer: 6%

Question: what was the percentage change in research and development 2013 total from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -1%

Answer: -1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of net sales for the commodity chemicals business that has been reclassified and reported as discontinued operations from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1580.

Rejected response: -44.

PPG || what was the change in millions of net sales for the commodity chemicals business that has been reclassified and reported as discontinued operations <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in millions of net sales for the commodity chemicals business that has been reclassified and reported as discontinued operations from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -1580

millions the net sales of year-ended 2013 is $ 108 ; the net sales of year-ended 2012 is $ 1688 ; the net sales of year-ended 2011 is $ 1732 ;

the net sales and income before income taxes of the commodity chemicals business that have been reclassified and reported as discontinued operations are presented in the table below: .

the results of operations and cash flows of ppg's former commodity chemicals business for january 2013 and the net gain on the transaction are reported as results from discontinued operations for the year -ended december 31 , 2013 .

millions the income from discontinued operations net of tax of year-ended 2013 is $ 2197 ; the income from discontinued operations net of tax of year-ended 2012 is $ 228 ; the income from discontinued operations net of tax of year-ended 2011 is $ 250 ;

millions the net income from discontinued operations ( attributable to ppg ) of year-ended 2013 is $ 2197 ; the net income from discontinued operations ( attributable to ppg ) of year-ended 2012 is $ 215 ; the net income from discontinued operations ( attributable to ppg ) of year-ended 2011 is $ 237 ;

Answer: -1580

Question: what was the change in millions of net sales for the commodity chemicals business that has been reclassified and reported as discontinued operations from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -44

Answer: -44


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of net sales for the commodity chemicals business that has been reclassified and reported as discontinued operations from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -44.

Rejected response: -1580.

Question: what was the change in millions of net sales for the commodity chemicals business that has been reclassified and reported as discontinued operations from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -44

millions the net sales of year-ended 2013 is $ 108 ; the net sales of year-ended 2012 is $ 1688 ; the net sales of year-ended 2011 is $ 1732 ;

millions the income from discontinued operations net of tax of year-ended 2013 is $ 2197 ; the income from discontinued operations net of tax of year-ended 2012 is $ 228 ; the income from discontinued operations net of tax of year-ended 2011 is $ 250 ;

millions the net income from discontinued operations ( attributable to ppg ) of year-ended 2013 is $ 2197 ; the net income from discontinued operations ( attributable to ppg ) of year-ended 2012 is $ 215 ; the net income from discontinued operations ( attributable to ppg ) of year-ended 2011 is $ 237 ;

Answer: -44

Question: what was the change in millions of net sales for the commodity chemicals business that has been reclassified and reported as discontinued operations from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -1580

Answer: -1580


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total freight revenues was the coal commodity group in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17%.

Rejected response: 18%.

UNP || what percentage of total freight revenues was the coal commodity group <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total freight revenues was the coal commodity group in 2014?

Answer: 17%

millions the coal of 2014 is 4127 ; the coal of 2013 is 3978 ; the coal of 2012 is 3912 ;

millions the total operatingrevenues of 2014 is $ 23988 ; the total operatingrevenues of 2013 is $ 21963 ; the total operatingrevenues of 2012 is $ 20926 ;

millions The total freight revenues of 2014 is $ 22560 ; The total freight revenues of 2013 is $ 20684 ; The total freight revenues of 2012 is $ 19686 ;

millions the total freight revenues of 2014 is $ 22560 ; the total freight revenues of 2013 is $ 20684 ; the total freight revenues of 2012 is $ 19686 ;

Answer: 17%

Question: what percentage of total freight revenues was the coal commodity group in 2013?

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total freight revenues was the coal commodity group in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 17%.

Question: what percentage of total freight revenues was the coal commodity group in 2013?

Answer: 18%

millions the coal of 2014 is 4127 ; the coal of 2013 is 3978 ; the coal of 2012 is 3912 ;

millions the total freight revenues of 2014 is $ 22560 ; the total freight revenues of 2013 is $ 20684 ; the total freight revenues of 2012 is $ 19686 ;

millions the total operatingrevenues of 2014 is $ 23988 ; the total operatingrevenues of 2013 is $ 21963 ; the total operatingrevenues of 2012 is $ 20926 ;

Answer: 18%

Question: what percentage of total freight revenues was the coal commodity group in 2014?

Answer: 17%

Answer: 17%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1%.

Rejected response: -2%.

UNP || what was the percentage change in rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -1%

rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 618 million in 2013 , $ 631 million in 2012 , and $ 637 million in 2011 .

future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2013 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases .

on december 19 , 2011 , we redeemed the remaining $ 175 million of our 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) notes due april 15 , 2012 , and all $ 300 million of our outstanding 6.125% ( 6.125 % ) notes due january 15 , 2012 .

these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities , including our headquarters building ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions .

millions the total minimum leasepayments of operatingleases is $ 4066 ; the total minimum leasepayments of capitalleases is $ 2200 ;

Answer: -1%

Question: what was the percentage change in rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -2%

receivables securitization facility 2013 as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded $ 0 and $ 100 million , respectively , as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility .

Answer: -2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2%.

Rejected response: -1%.

Question: what was the percentage change in rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -2%

future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2013 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases .

millions the total minimum leasepayments of operatingleases is $ 4066 ; the total minimum leasepayments of capitalleases is $ 2200 ;

rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 618 million in 2013 , $ 631 million in 2012 , and $ 637 million in 2011 .

Answer: -2%

Question: what was the percentage change in rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -1%

these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities , including our headquarters building ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions .

Answer: -1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the roi of an investment in abiomed inc from march 2006 to march 2009?
Reference time interval: 2006-03-01 00:00:00 to 2009-04-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -62.0%.

Rejected response: 80.9%.

ABMD || what is the roi of an investment in abiomed inc <TIME>?

Question: what is the roi of an investment in abiomed inc from march 2006 to march 2009?

Answer: -62.0%

the abiomed inc of 3/31/2006 is 100 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2007 is 105.89 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2008 is 101.86 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2009 is 37.98 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2010 is 80.00 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2011 is 112.64 ;

The nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2006 is 100 ; The nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2007 is 103.50 ; The nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2008 is 97.41 ; The nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2009 is 65.33 ; The nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2010 is 102.49 ; The nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2011 is 118.86 ;

the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2006 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s .

the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2006 is 100 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2007 is 88.78 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2008 is 84.26 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2009 is 46.12 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2010 is 83.47 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2011 is 91.35 ;

Answer: -62.0%

Question: what is the roi of an investment in abiomed inc from march 2010 to march 2013?

Answer: 80.9%

the abiomed inc of 3/31/2010 is 100 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2011 is 140.79 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2012 is 215.02 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2013 is 180.91 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2014 is 252.33 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2015 is 693.60 ;

The nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2010 is 100 ; The nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2011 is 115.98 ; The nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2012 is 128.93 ; The nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2013 is 136.26 ; The nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2014 is 175.11 ; The nasdaq composite index of 3/31/2015 is 204.38 ;

the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2010 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s .

the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2010 is 100 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2011 is 108.31 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2012 is 115.05 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2013 is 105.56 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2014 is 123.18 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2015 is 118.95 ;

Answer: 80.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the roi of an investment in abiomed inc from march 2010 to march 2013?
Reference time interval: 2010-03-01 00:00:00 to 2013-04-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 80.9%.

Rejected response: -62.0%.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in abiomed inc from march 2010 to march 2013?

Answer: 80.9%

the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2010 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s .

the abiomed inc of 3/31/2010 is 100 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2011 is 140.79 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2012 is 215.02 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2013 is 180.91 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2014 is 252.33 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2015 is 693.60 ;

the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2010 is 100 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2011 is 108.31 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2012 is 115.05 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2013 is 105.56 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2014 is 123.18 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2015 is 118.95 ;

Answer: 80.9%

Question: what is the roi of an investment in abiomed inc from march 2006 to march 2009?

Answer: -62.0%

the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2006 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s .

the abiomed inc of 3/31/2006 is 100 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2007 is 105.89 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2008 is 101.86 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2009 is 37.98 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2010 is 80.00 ; the abiomed inc of 3/31/2011 is 112.64 ;

the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2006 is 100 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2007 is 88.78 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2008 is 84.26 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2009 is 46.12 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2010 is 83.47 ; the nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 of 3/31/2011 is 91.35 ;

Answer: -62.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in warranty liability during 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -96.

Rejected response: 161.

CAT || what is the net change in warranty liability <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in warranty liability during 2016?

Answer: -96

( millions of dollars ) the warranty liability january 1 of 2017 is $ 1258 ; the warranty liability january 1 of 2016 is $ 1354 ;

( millions of dollars ) the warranty liability december 31 of 2017 is $ 1419 ; the warranty liability december 31 of 2016 is $ 1258 ;

( millions of dollars ) The increase in liability ( new warranties ) of 2017 is 1021 ; The increase in liability ( new warranties ) of 2016 is 813 ;

( millions of dollars ) the increase in liability ( new warranties ) of 2017 is 1021 ; the increase in liability ( new warranties ) of 2016 is 813 ;

Answer: -96

Question: what is the net change in warranty liability during 2017?

Answer: 161

Answer: 161


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in warranty liability during 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 161.

Rejected response: -96.

Question: what is the net change in warranty liability during 2017?

Answer: 161

( millions of dollars ) the warranty liability january 1 of 2017 is $ 1258 ; the warranty liability january 1 of 2016 is $ 1354 ;

( millions of dollars ) the increase in liability ( new warranties ) of 2017 is 1021 ; the increase in liability ( new warranties ) of 2016 is 813 ;

( millions of dollars ) the warranty liability december 31 of 2017 is $ 1419 ; the warranty liability december 31 of 2016 is $ 1258 ;

Answer: 161

Question: what is the net change in warranty liability during 2016?

Answer: -96

Answer: -96


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: based on the review of the activity between the company and the 2007 financing entities what was the ratio of the cash payments to cash receipts in 2012
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.83.

Rejected response: 2.55.

IP || based on the review of the activity between the company and the <TIME> financing entities what was the ratio of the cash payments to cash receipts <TIME>

Question: based on the review of the activity between the company and the 2007 financing entities what was the ratio of the cash payments to cash receipts in 2012

Answer: 1.83

in millions the cash receipts ( c ) of 2014 is 7 ; the cash receipts ( c ) of 2013 is 8 ; the cash receipts ( c ) of 2012 is 12 ;

in millions the cash payments ( d ) of 2014 is 18 ; the cash payments ( d ) of 2013 is 21 ; the cash payments ( d ) of 2012 is 22 ;

activity between the company and the 2007 financing entities was as follows: .

( b ) the expense is included in interest expense , net in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and includes $ 7 million , $ 7 million and $ 6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively , of accretion expense for the amortization of the purchase accounting adjustment on the nonrecourse financial liabilities of special purpose entities .

Answer: 1.83

Question: based on the review of the activity between the company and the 2015 financing entities what was the ratio of the cash payments to cash receipts in 2013

Answer: 2.55

in millions the cash receipts ( b ) of 2015 is 21 ; the cash receipts ( b ) of 2014 is 22 ; the cash receipts ( b ) of 2013 is 33 ;

in millions the cash payments ( c ) of 2015 is 71 ; the cash payments ( c ) of 2014 is 73 ; the cash payments ( c ) of 2013 is 84 ;

after formation of the 2015 financing entities , cash receipts are interest received on the financial assets of special purpose entities. .

also , during the third quarter of 2015 , the 2015 financing entities used $ 630 million in cash to pay down a portion of the third party bank loans and refinanced approximately $ 4.2 billion of those loans on nonrecourse terms ( the 2015 refinance loans ) .

Answer: 2.55


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: based on the review of the activity between the company and the 2015 financing entities what was the ratio of the cash payments to cash receipts in 2013
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.55.

Rejected response: 1.83.

Question: based on the review of the activity between the company and the 2015 financing entities what was the ratio of the cash payments to cash receipts in 2013

Answer: 2.55

also , during the third quarter of 2015 , the 2015 financing entities used $ 630 million in cash to pay down a portion of the third party bank loans and refinanced approximately $ 4.2 billion of those loans on nonrecourse terms ( the 2015 refinance loans ) .

in millions the cash receipts ( b ) of 2015 is 21 ; the cash receipts ( b ) of 2014 is 22 ; the cash receipts ( b ) of 2013 is 33 ;

in millions the cash payments ( c ) of 2015 is 71 ; the cash payments ( c ) of 2014 is 73 ; the cash payments ( c ) of 2013 is 84 ;

Answer: 2.55

Question: based on the review of the activity between the company and the 2007 financing entities what was the ratio of the cash payments to cash receipts in 2012

Answer: 1.83

in millions the cash receipts ( c ) of 2014 is 7 ; the cash receipts ( c ) of 2013 is 8 ; the cash receipts ( c ) of 2012 is 12 ;

in millions the cash payments ( d ) of 2014 is 18 ; the cash payments ( d ) of 2013 is 21 ; the cash payments ( d ) of 2012 is 22 ;

( b ) the expense is included in interest expense , net in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and includes $ 7 million , $ 7 million and $ 6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively , of accretion expense for the amortization of the purchase accounting adjustment on the nonrecourse financial liabilities of special purpose entities .

Answer: 1.83


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of compensation and benefits from 2008 to 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -394.

Rejected response: -69.

UNP || what was the change in millions of compensation and benefits <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in millions of compensation and benefits from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: -394

millions of dollars the compensation and benefits of 2009 is $ 4063 ; the compensation and benefits of 2008 is $ 4457 ; the compensation and benefits of 2007 is $ 4526 ; the compensation and benefits of % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 is ( 9 ) % ( % ) ; the compensation and benefits of % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 is ( 2 ) % ( % ) ;

operating expenses millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 % (  % ) change 2009 v 2008 % (  % ) change 2008 v 2007 .

millions of dollars The other of 2009 is 687 ; The other of 2008 is 840 ; The other of 2007 is 733 ; The other of % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 is -18 ( 18 ) ; The other of % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 is 15 ;

millions of dollars the equipment and other rents of 2009 is 1180 ; the equipment and other rents of 2008 is 1326 ; the equipment and other rents of 2007 is 1368 ; the equipment and other rents of % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 is -11 ( 11 ) ; the equipment and other rents of % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 is -3 ( 3 ) ;

millions of dollars the total of 2009 is $ 10751 ; the total of 2008 is $ 13895 ; the total of 2007 is $ 12908 ; the total of % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 is ( 23 ) % ( % ) ; the total of % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 is 8% ( 8 % ) ;

Answer: -394

Question: what was the change in millions of compensation and benefits from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -69

Answer: -69


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of compensation and benefits from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -69.

Rejected response: -394.

Question: what was the change in millions of compensation and benefits from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -69

millions of dollars the compensation and benefits of 2009 is $ 4063 ; the compensation and benefits of 2008 is $ 4457 ; the compensation and benefits of 2007 is $ 4526 ; the compensation and benefits of % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 is ( 9 ) % ( % ) ; the compensation and benefits of % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 is ( 2 ) % ( % ) ;

millions of dollars the equipment and other rents of 2009 is 1180 ; the equipment and other rents of 2008 is 1326 ; the equipment and other rents of 2007 is 1368 ; the equipment and other rents of % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 is -11 ( 11 ) ; the equipment and other rents of % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 is -3 ( 3 ) ;

millions of dollars the total of 2009 is $ 10751 ; the total of 2008 is $ 13895 ; the total of 2007 is $ 12908 ; the total of % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 is ( 23 ) % ( % ) ; the total of % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 is 8% ( 8 % ) ;

Answer: -69

Question: what was the change in millions of compensation and benefits from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: -394

Answer: -394


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in cash from operating activities from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3%.

Rejected response: 10%.

PPG || what was the percentage change in cash from operating activities <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in cash from operating activities from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: -3%

cash from operating activities was $ 1436 million , $ 1310 million , and $ 1345 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively .

capital spending , excluding acquisitions , as a percentage of sales was 2.6% ( 2.6 % ) , 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .

( millions ) the operating working capital of 2011 is $ 2739 ; the operating working capital of 2010 is $ 2595 ; the operating working capital of is ;

Answer: -3%

Question: what was the percentage change in cash from operating activities from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 10%

Answer: 10%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in cash from operating activities from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10%.

Rejected response: -3%.

Question: what was the percentage change in cash from operating activities from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 10%

cash from operating activities was $ 1436 million , $ 1310 million , and $ 1345 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively .

( millions ) the operating working capital of 2011 is $ 2739 ; the operating working capital of 2010 is $ 2595 ; the operating working capital of is ;

Answer: 10%

Question: what was the percentage change in cash from operating activities from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: -3%

Answer: -3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in expenses related to personal pension plan from 2008 to 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -18.8%.

Rejected response: 69.2%.

BLK || what is the percentage change in expenses related to personal pension plan <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in expenses related to personal pension plan from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: -18.8%

the expense for this plan was $ 22 million , $ 13 million and $ 16 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , expenses and unfunded obligations for these benefits were immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements .

blackrock group personal pension plan blackrock investment management ( uk ) limited ( 201cbim 201d ) , a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company , contributes to the blackrock group personal pension plan , a defined contribution plan for all employees of bim .

the retirement plan expense was $ 13 million for the year ended december 31 , 2010 and immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for the year ended december 31 , 2009 .

quoted prices significant in active other markets for observable identical assets inputs december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) ( level 1 ) ( level 2 ) 2010 .

Answer: -18.8%

Question: what is the percentage change in expenses related to personal pension plan from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 69.2%

Answer: 69.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in expenses related to personal pension plan from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 69.2%.

Rejected response: -18.8%.

Question: what is the percentage change in expenses related to personal pension plan from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 69.2%

the retirement plan expense was $ 13 million for the year ended december 31 , 2010 and immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for the year ended december 31 , 2009 .

the expense for this plan was $ 22 million , $ 13 million and $ 16 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

quoted prices significant in active other markets for observable identical assets inputs december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) ( level 1 ) ( level 2 ) 2010 .

Answer: 69.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in expenses related to personal pension plan from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: -18.8%

Answer: -18.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the expected percentage change in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2017 to 2018?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -4.9%.

Rejected response: 6.0%.

BLK || what is the expected percentage change in rent expense and certain office equipment expense <TIME>?

Question: what is the expected percentage change in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: -4.9%

rent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 134 million , $ 136 million and $ 132 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

Answer: -4.9%

Question: what is the expected percentage change in rent expense and certain office equipment expense in 2017?

Answer: 6.0%

Answer: 6.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the expected percentage change in rent expense and certain office equipment expense in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6.0%.

Rejected response: -4.9%.

Question: what is the expected percentage change in rent expense and certain office equipment expense in 2017?

Answer: 6.0%

rent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 134 million , $ 136 million and $ 132 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

Answer: 6.0%

Question: what is the expected percentage change in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: -4.9%

Answer: -4.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in fuel surcharge revenues from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 0%.

Rejected response: 18%.

UNP || what was the percentage change in fuel surcharge revenues <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in fuel surcharge revenues from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 0%

our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.6 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.2 billion in 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively .

millions The other revenues of 2013 is 1279 ; The other revenues of 2012 is 1240 ; The other revenues of 2011 is 1049 ; The other revenues of % ( % ) change 2013 v 2012 is 3 ; The other revenues of % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 is 18 ;

results of operations operating revenues millions 2013 2012 2011 % (  % ) change 2013 v 2012 % (  % ) change 2012 v 2011 .

millions the freight revenues of 2013 is $ 20684 ; the freight revenues of 2012 is $ 19686 ; the freight revenues of 2011 is $ 18508 ; the freight revenues of % ( % ) change 2013 v 2012 is 5% ( 5 % ) ; the freight revenues of % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 is 6% ( 6 % ) ;

millions the total of 2013 is $ 21963 ; the total of 2012 is $ 20926 ; the total of 2011 is $ 19557 ; the total of % ( % ) change 2013 v 2012 is 5% ( 5 % ) ; the total of % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 is 7% ( 7 % ) ;

Answer: 0%

Question: what was the percentage change in fuel surcharge revenues from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in fuel surcharge revenues from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 0%.

Question: what was the percentage change in fuel surcharge revenues from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 18%

millions the freight revenues of 2013 is $ 20684 ; the freight revenues of 2012 is $ 19686 ; the freight revenues of 2011 is $ 18508 ; the freight revenues of % ( % ) change 2013 v 2012 is 5% ( 5 % ) ; the freight revenues of % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 is 6% ( 6 % ) ;

millions the total of 2013 is $ 21963 ; the total of 2012 is $ 20926 ; the total of 2011 is $ 19557 ; the total of % ( % ) change 2013 v 2012 is 5% ( 5 % ) ; the total of % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 is 7% ( 7 % ) ;

our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.6 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.2 billion in 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively .

Answer: 18%

Question: what was the percentage change in fuel surcharge revenues from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 0%

Answer: 0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in interest payments from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 124%.

Rejected response: 13%.

PPG || what was the percentage change in interest payments <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in interest payments from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 124%

interest payments in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 totaled $ 228 million , $ 102 million and $ 90 million , respectively .

short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2008 2007 .

as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 guarantees outstanding were $ 70 million .

( millions ) the total of 2008 is $ 784 ; the total of 2007 is $ 1818 ;

the corresponding amounts as of december 31 , 2007 , were $ 1201 million and $ 1226 million , respectively .

Answer: 124%

Question: what was the percentage change in interest payments from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 13%

rental expense for operating leases was $ 267 million , $ 188 million and $ 161 million in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively .

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in interest payments from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: 124%.

Question: what was the percentage change in interest payments from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 13%

( millions ) the total of 2008 is $ 784 ; the total of 2007 is $ 1818 ;

interest payments in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 totaled $ 228 million , $ 102 million and $ 90 million , respectively .

the corresponding amounts as of december 31 , 2007 , were $ 1201 million and $ 1226 million , respectively .

Answer: 13%

Question: what was the percentage change in interest payments from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 124%

Answer: 124%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -23%.

Rejected response: 4%.

PPG || what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -23%

( millions ) the balance at december 31 of 2013 is $ 85 ; the balance at december 31 of 2012 is $ 82 ; the balance at december 31 of 2011 is $ 107 ;

the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant .

( millions ) The pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits of 2013 is 2014 ; The pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits of 2012 is 2 ; The pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits of 2011 is 2014 ;

( millions ) the balance at january 1 of 2013 is $ 82 ; the balance at january 1 of 2012 is $ 107 ; the balance at january 1 of 2011 is $ 111 ;

( millions ) the pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits of 2013 is 2014 ; the pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits of 2012 is 2 ; the pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits of 2011 is 2014 ;

Answer: -23%

Question: what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 4%

Answer: 4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4%.

Rejected response: -23%.

Question: what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 4%

( millions ) the balance at january 1 of 2013 is $ 82 ; the balance at january 1 of 2012 is $ 107 ; the balance at january 1 of 2011 is $ 111 ;

( millions ) the pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits of 2013 is 2014 ; the pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits of 2012 is 2 ; the pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits of 2011 is 2014 ;

( millions ) the balance at december 31 of 2013 is $ 85 ; the balance at december 31 of 2012 is $ 82 ; the balance at december 31 of 2011 is $ 107 ;

Answer: 4%

Question: what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -23%

Answer: -23%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage of dividends paid to cash provided by operating activities in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 25%.

Rejected response: 32%.

UNP || what was the percentage of dividends paid to cash provided by operating activities <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage of dividends paid to cash provided by operating activities in 2016?

Answer: 25%

millions the cash provided by operating activities of 2016 is $ 7525 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2015 is $ 7344 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2014 is $ 7385 ;

millions the dividends paid of 2016 is -1879 ( 1879 ) ; the dividends paid of 2015 is -2344 ( 2344 ) ; the dividends paid of 2014 is -1632 ( 1632 ) ;

to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .

millions the cash used in investing activities of 2016 is -3393 ( 3393 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2015 is -4476 ( 4476 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2014 is -4249 ( 4249 ) ;

Answer: 25%

Question: what was the percentage of dividends paid to cash provided by operating activities in 2015?

Answer: 32%

we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network .

Answer: 32%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage of dividends paid to cash provided by operating activities in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 32%.

Rejected response: 25%.

Question: what was the percentage of dividends paid to cash provided by operating activities in 2015?

Answer: 32%

millions the cash provided by operating activities of 2016 is $ 7525 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2015 is $ 7344 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2014 is $ 7385 ;

millions the dividends paid of 2016 is -1879 ( 1879 ) ; the dividends paid of 2015 is -2344 ( 2344 ) ; the dividends paid of 2014 is -1632 ( 1632 ) ;

we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network .

Answer: 32%

Question: what was the percentage of dividends paid to cash provided by operating activities in 2016?

Answer: 25%

millions the cash used in investing activities of 2016 is -3393 ( 3393 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2015 is -4476 ( 4476 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2014 is -4249 ( 4249 ) ;

Answer: 25%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total freight revenues was the chemicals group in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 15%.

Rejected response: 16%.

UNP || what percent of total freight revenues was the chemicals group <TIME>?

Question: what percent of total freight revenues was the chemicals group in 2008?

Answer: 15%

millions of dollars the chemicals of 2009 is 2102 ; the chemicals of 2008 is 2494 ; the chemicals of 2007 is 2287 ;

millions of dollars the total freight revenues of 2009 is $ 13373 ; the total freight revenues of 2008 is $ 17118 ; the total freight revenues of 2007 is $ 15486 ;

millions of dollars The total operating revenues of 2009 is $ 14143 ; The total operating revenues of 2008 is $ 17970 ; The total operating revenues of 2007 is $ 16283 ;

millions of dollars the total operating revenues of 2009 is $ 14143 ; the total operating revenues of 2008 is $ 17970 ; the total operating revenues of 2007 is $ 16283 ;

Answer: 15%

Question: what percent of total freight revenues was the chemicals group in 2009?

Answer: 16%

Answer: 16%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total freight revenues was the chemicals group in 2009?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 16%.

Rejected response: 15%.

Question: what percent of total freight revenues was the chemicals group in 2009?

Answer: 16%

millions of dollars the chemicals of 2009 is 2102 ; the chemicals of 2008 is 2494 ; the chemicals of 2007 is 2287 ;

millions of dollars the total freight revenues of 2009 is $ 13373 ; the total freight revenues of 2008 is $ 17118 ; the total freight revenues of 2007 is $ 15486 ;

millions of dollars the total operating revenues of 2009 is $ 14143 ; the total operating revenues of 2008 is $ 17970 ; the total operating revenues of 2007 is $ 16283 ;

Answer: 16%

Question: what percent of total freight revenues was the chemicals group in 2008?

Answer: 15%

Answer: 15%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of cash provided by operating activities from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1768.

Rejected response: 288.

UNP || what was the change in millions of cash provided by operating activities <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in millions of cash provided by operating activities from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 1768

cash flowsmillions the cash provided by operating activities of 2012 is $ 6161 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 5873 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2010 is $ 4105 ;

cash flowsmillions The net change in cash and cashequivalents of 2012 is $ -154 ( 154 ) ; The net change in cash and cashequivalents of 2011 is $ 131 ; The net change in cash and cashequivalents of 2010 is $ -764 ( 764 ) ;

cash flowsmillions the cash used in investing activities of 2012 is -3633 ( 3633 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2011 is -3119 ( 3119 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2010 is -2488 ( 2488 ) ;

in addition , the adoption of a new accounting standard in january of 2010 changed the accounting treatment for our receivables securitization facility from a sale of undivided interests ( recorded as an operating activity ) to a secured borrowing ( recorded as a financing activity ) , which decreased cash provided by operating activities by $ 400 million in 2010 .

Answer: 1768

Question: what was the change in millions of cash provided by operating activities from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 288

cash flowsmillions the cash used in financing activities of 2012 is -2682 ( 2682 ) ; the cash used in financing activities of 2011 is -2623 ( 2623 ) ; the cash used in financing activities of 2010 is -2381 ( 2381 ) ;

Answer: 288


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of cash provided by operating activities from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 288.

Rejected response: 1768.

Question: what was the change in millions of cash provided by operating activities from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 288

cash flowsmillions the cash provided by operating activities of 2012 is $ 6161 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 5873 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2010 is $ 4105 ;

cash flowsmillions the cash used in investing activities of 2012 is -3633 ( 3633 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2011 is -3119 ( 3119 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2010 is -2488 ( 2488 ) ;

cash flowsmillions the cash used in financing activities of 2012 is -2682 ( 2682 ) ; the cash used in financing activities of 2011 is -2623 ( 2623 ) ; the cash used in financing activities of 2010 is -2381 ( 2381 ) ;

Answer: 288

Question: what was the change in millions of cash provided by operating activities from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 1768

in addition , the adoption of a new accounting standard in january of 2010 changed the accounting treatment for our receivables securitization facility from a sale of undivided interests ( recorded as an operating activity ) to a secured borrowing ( recorded as a financing activity ) , which decreased cash provided by operating activities by $ 400 million in 2010 .

Answer: 1768


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total material obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2012 are operating leases?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 16%.

Rejected response: 18%.

UNP || what percentage of total material obligations and commitments as of december 31 , <TIME> are operating leases?

Question: what percentage of total material obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2012 are operating leases?

Answer: 16%

contractual obligationsmillions the operating leases [b] of total is 4241 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2013 is 525 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2014 is 466 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2015 is 410 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2016 is 375 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2017 is 339 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 after2017 is 2126 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 other is - ;

contractual obligationsmillions the total contractualobligations of total is $ 25763 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2013 is $ 4361 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2014 is $ 2917 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2015 is $ 1712 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2016 is $ 1755 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2017 is $ 1741 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 after2017 is $ 13130 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 other is $ 147 ;

the following tables identify material obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2012 : payments due by december 31 , contractual obligations after millions total 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 other .

Answer: 16%

Question: what percentage of total material obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2011 are operating leases?

Answer: 18%

contractual obligationsmillions the operating leases [b] of total is 4528 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2012 is 525 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2013 is 489 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2014 is 415 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2015 is 372 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2016 is 347 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 after 2016 is 2380 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 other is - ;

contractual obligationsmillions the total contractualobligations of total is $ 25096 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2012 is $ 4015 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2013 is $ 2204 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2014 is $ 2164 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2015 is $ 1565 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2016 is $ 1532 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 after 2016 is $ 13508 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 other is $ 108 ;

the following tables identify material obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2011 : payments due by december 31 , contractual obligations after millions total 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 other .

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total material obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2011 are operating leases?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 16%.

Question: what percentage of total material obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2011 are operating leases?

Answer: 18%

contractual obligationsmillions the operating leases [b] of total is 4528 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2012 is 525 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2013 is 489 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2014 is 415 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2015 is 372 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2016 is 347 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 after 2016 is 2380 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 other is - ;

contractual obligationsmillions the total contractualobligations of total is $ 25096 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2012 is $ 4015 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2013 is $ 2204 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2014 is $ 2164 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2015 is $ 1565 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2016 is $ 1532 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 after 2016 is $ 13508 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 other is $ 108 ;

Answer: 18%

Question: what percentage of total material obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2012 are operating leases?

Answer: 16%

contractual obligationsmillions the operating leases [b] of total is 4241 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2013 is 525 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2014 is 466 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2015 is 410 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2016 is 375 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 2017 is 339 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 after2017 is 2126 ; the operating leases [b] of payments due by december 31 other is - ;

contractual obligationsmillions the total contractualobligations of total is $ 25763 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2013 is $ 4361 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2014 is $ 2917 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2015 is $ 1712 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2016 is $ 1755 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 2017 is $ 1741 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 after2017 is $ 13130 ; the total contractualobligations of payments due by december 31 other is $ 147 ;

Answer: 16%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in other income from 2011 to 2012 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -4.

Rejected response: 58.

UNP || what was the change in other income <TIME> in millions?

Question: what was the change in other income from 2011 to 2012 in millions?

Answer: -4

millions the other income of 2012 is $ 108 ; the other income of 2011 is $ 112 ; the other income of 2010 is $ 54 ; the other income of % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 is ( 4 ) % ( % ) ; the other income of % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 is 107% ( 107 % ) ;

non-operating items millions 2012 2011 2010 % (  % ) change 2012 v 2011 % (  % ) change 2011 v 2010 .

millions The income taxes of 2012 is -2375 ( 2375 ) ; The income taxes of 2011 is -1972 ( 1972 ) ; The income taxes of 2010 is -1653 ( 1653 ) ; The income taxes of % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 is 20% ( 20 % ) ; The income taxes of % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 is 19% ( 19 % ) ;

millions the income taxes of 2012 is -2375 ( 2375 ) ; the income taxes of 2011 is -1972 ( 1972 ) ; the income taxes of 2010 is -1653 ( 1653 ) ; the income taxes of % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 is 20% ( 20 % ) ; the income taxes of % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 is 19% ( 19 % ) ;

other income 2013 other income decreased in 2012 versus 2011 due to lower gains from real estate sales and higher environmental costs associated with non-operating properties , partially offset by an interest payment from a tax refund. .

Answer: -4

Question: what was the change in other income from 2010 to 2011 in millions?

Answer: 58

Answer: 58


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in other income from 2010 to 2011 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 58.

Rejected response: -4.

Question: what was the change in other income from 2010 to 2011 in millions?

Answer: 58

millions the other income of 2012 is $ 108 ; the other income of 2011 is $ 112 ; the other income of 2010 is $ 54 ; the other income of % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 is ( 4 ) % ( % ) ; the other income of % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 is 107% ( 107 % ) ;

millions the income taxes of 2012 is -2375 ( 2375 ) ; the income taxes of 2011 is -1972 ( 1972 ) ; the income taxes of 2010 is -1653 ( 1653 ) ; the income taxes of % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 is 20% ( 20 % ) ; the income taxes of % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 is 19% ( 19 % ) ;

other income 2013 other income decreased in 2012 versus 2011 due to lower gains from real estate sales and higher environmental costs associated with non-operating properties , partially offset by an interest payment from a tax refund. .

Answer: 58

Question: what was the change in other income from 2011 to 2012 in millions?

Answer: -4

Answer: -4


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total interest payments from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -6%.

Rejected response: 12%.

PPG || what was the percentage change in total interest payments <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in total interest payments from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: -6%

interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively .

( millions ) The total of 2011 is $ 33 ; The total of 2010 is $ 24 ;

( millions ) the total of 2011 is $ 33 ; the total of 2010 is $ 24 ;

Answer: -6%

Question: what was the percentage change in total interest payments from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 12%

Answer: 12%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total interest payments from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12%.

Rejected response: -6%.

Question: what was the percentage change in total interest payments from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 12%

interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively .

( millions ) the total of 2011 is $ 33 ; the total of 2010 is $ 24 ;

Answer: 12%

Question: what was the percentage change in total interest payments from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: -6%

Answer: -6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the average industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2006
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1799.7.

Rejected response: 2039.7.

IP || what was the average industry segment operating profits <TIME>

Question: what was the average industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2006

Answer: 1799.7

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2006 is $ 2074 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1622 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2004 is $ 1703 ;

industry segment operating profits are defined as earnings before taxes and minority interest , interest expense , corporate items and corporate special items .

results of operations industry segment operating profits are used by inter- national paper 2019s management to measure the earn- ings performance of its businesses .

in millions the discontinued operations of 2006 is -232 ( 232 ) ; the discontinued operations of 2005 is 416 ; the discontinued operations of 2004 is -273 ( 273 ) ;

in millions the net earnings ( loss ) of 2006 is $ 1050 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2005 is $ 1100 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2004 is $ -35 ( 35 ) ;

Answer: 1799.7

Question: what was the average industry segment operating profits from 2005 to 2007

Answer: 2039.7

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2007 is $ 2423 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2006 is $ 2074 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1622 ;

industry segment operating profits of $ 2.4 billion were $ 349 million higher in 2007 than in 2006 due principally to the benefits from higher average price realizations ( $ 461 million ) , the net impact of cost reduction initiatives , improved operating perform- ance and a more favorable mix of products sold ( $ 304 million ) , higher sales volumes ( $ 17 million ) , lower special item costs ( $ 115 million ) and other items ( $ 4 million ) .

Answer: 2039.7


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the average industry segment operating profits from 2005 to 2007
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2039.7.

Rejected response: 1799.7.

Question: what was the average industry segment operating profits from 2005 to 2007

Answer: 2039.7

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2007 is $ 2423 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2006 is $ 2074 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1622 ;

industry segment operating profits of $ 2.4 billion were $ 349 million higher in 2007 than in 2006 due principally to the benefits from higher average price realizations ( $ 461 million ) , the net impact of cost reduction initiatives , improved operating perform- ance and a more favorable mix of products sold ( $ 304 million ) , higher sales volumes ( $ 17 million ) , lower special item costs ( $ 115 million ) and other items ( $ 4 million ) .

Answer: 2039.7

Question: what was the average industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2006

Answer: 1799.7

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2006 is $ 2074 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1622 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2004 is $ 1703 ;

in millions the discontinued operations of 2006 is -232 ( 232 ) ; the discontinued operations of 2005 is 416 ; the discontinued operations of 2004 is -273 ( 273 ) ;

in millions the net earnings ( loss ) of 2006 is $ 1050 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2005 is $ 1100 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2004 is $ -35 ( 35 ) ;

Answer: 1799.7


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in research and development net from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1%.

Rejected response: -2%.

PPG || what was the percentage change in research and development net <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in research and development net from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -1%

( $ in millions ) the research and development net of 2016 is $ 466 ; the research and development net of 2015 is $ 476 ; the research and development net of 2014 is $ 483 ;

( $ in millions ) The research and development 2013 total of 2016 is $ 487 ; The research and development 2013 total of 2015 is $ 494 ; The research and development 2013 total of 2014 is $ 499 ;

( $ in millions ) the research and development 2013 total of 2016 is $ 487 ; the research and development 2013 total of 2015 is $ 494 ; the research and development 2013 total of 2014 is $ 499 ;

marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .

Answer: -1%

Question: what was the percentage change in research and development net from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -2%

Answer: -2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in research and development net from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2%.

Rejected response: -1%.

Question: what was the percentage change in research and development net from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -2%

( $ in millions ) the research and development 2013 total of 2016 is $ 487 ; the research and development 2013 total of 2015 is $ 494 ; the research and development 2013 total of 2014 is $ 499 ;

( $ in millions ) the research and development net of 2016 is $ 466 ; the research and development net of 2015 is $ 476 ; the research and development net of 2014 is $ 483 ;

marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .

Answer: -2%

Question: what was the percentage change in research and development net from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -1%

Answer: -1%