Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in operating profit for mfc in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.9%.

Rejected response: -5.1%.

Question: what is the growth rate in operating profit for mfc in 2013?

Answer: 13.9%

the net sales of 2014 is $ 7680 ; the net sales of 2013 is $ 7757 ; the net sales of 2012 is $ 7457 ;

the operating profit of 2014 is 1358 ; the operating profit of 2013 is 1431 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 1256 ;

the operating margins of 2014 is 17.7% ( 17.7 % ) ; the operating margins of 2013 is 18.4% ( 18.4 % ) ; the operating margins of 2012 is 16.8% ( 16.8 % ) ;

Answer: 13.9%

Question: what is the growth rate in operating profit for mfc in 2014?

Answer: -5.1%

Answer: -5.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total cable segment capital expenditures in 2004 where due to upgrading of cable systems?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 25%.

Rejected response: 7%.

CMCSA || what percentage of total cable segment capital expenditures <TIME> where due to upgrading of cable systems?

Question: what percentage of total cable segment capital expenditures in 2004 where due to upgrading of cable systems?

Answer: 25%

the upgrading of cable systems of 2004 is 902 ; the upgrading of cable systems of 2005 is 200 ;

the total cable segment capital expenditures of 2004 is $ 3622 ; the total cable segment capital expenditures of 2005 is $ 3000 ;

the following table illustrates the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable segment during 2004 and expect to incur in 2005 ( dollars in millions ) : .

Answer: 25%

Question: what percentage of total cable segment capital expenditures in 2005 where due to upgrading of cable systems?

Answer: 7%

Answer: 7%

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total cable segment capital expenditures in 2005 where due to upgrading of cable systems?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7%.

Rejected response: 25%.

Question: what percentage of total cable segment capital expenditures in 2005 where due to upgrading of cable systems?

Answer: 7%

the following table illustrates the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable segment during 2004 and expect to incur in 2005 ( dollars in millions ) : .

the upgrading of cable systems of 2004 is 902 ; the upgrading of cable systems of 2005 is 200 ;

the total cable segment capital expenditures of 2004 is $ 3622 ; the total cable segment capital expenditures of 2005 is $ 3000 ;

Answer: 7%

Question: what percentage of total cable segment capital expenditures in 2004 where due to upgrading of cable systems?

Answer: 25%

Answer: 25%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in thousands in impact on net income due to compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock between 2005 and 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2664.

Rejected response: 613.

PKG || what was the difference in thousands in impact on net income due to compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock <TIME>?

Question: what was the difference in thousands in impact on net income due to compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock between 2005 and 2006?

Answer: 2664

( in thousands ) the impact on net income of year ended december 31 , 2006 is $ -3680 ( 3680 ) ; the impact on net income of year ended december 31 , 2005 is $ -1016 ( 1016 ) ; the impact on net income of year ended december 31 , 2004 is $ -403 ( 403 ) ;

compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock recognized in the statements of income for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 was as follows : year ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) 2006 2005 2004 .

all stock-based compensation expense not recognized as of december 31 , 2005 and compensation expense related to post 2005 grants of stock options and amortization of restricted stock will be recorded directly to additional paid in capital .

( in thousands ) the stock options of year ended december 31 , 2006 is $ -3273 ( 3273 ) ; the stock options of year ended december 31 , 2005 is $ 2014 ; the stock options of year ended december 31 , 2004 is $ 2014 ;

( in thousands ) the restricted stock of year ended december 31 , 2006 is -2789 ( 2789 ) ; the restricted stock of year ended december 31 , 2005 is -1677 ( 1677 ) ; the restricted stock of year ended december 31 , 2004 is -663 ( 663 ) ;

Answer: 2664

Question: what was the difference in thousands in impact on net income due to compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock between 2004 and 2005?

Answer: 613

Answer: 613


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in thousands in impact on net income due to compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock between 2004 and 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 613.

Rejected response: 2664.

Question: what was the difference in thousands in impact on net income due to compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock between 2004 and 2005?

Answer: 613

( in thousands ) the stock options of year ended december 31 , 2006 is $ -3273 ( 3273 ) ; the stock options of year ended december 31 , 2005 is $ 2014 ; the stock options of year ended december 31 , 2004 is $ 2014 ;

( in thousands ) the restricted stock of year ended december 31 , 2006 is -2789 ( 2789 ) ; the restricted stock of year ended december 31 , 2005 is -1677 ( 1677 ) ; the restricted stock of year ended december 31 , 2004 is -663 ( 663 ) ;

( in thousands ) the impact on net income of year ended december 31 , 2006 is $ -3680 ( 3680 ) ; the impact on net income of year ended december 31 , 2005 is $ -1016 ( 1016 ) ; the impact on net income of year ended december 31 , 2004 is $ -403 ( 403 ) ;

Answer: 613

Question: what was the difference in thousands in impact on net income due to compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock between 2005 and 2006?

Answer: 2664

Answer: 2664


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total consolidate revenue was the psg segment in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 41%.

Rejected response: 42%.

FIS || what percent of total consolidate revenue was the psg segment <TIME>?

Question: what percent of total consolidate revenue was the psg segment in 2012?

Answer: 41%

the total consolidated revenues of 2012 is $ 5807.6 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2011 is $ 5625.6 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2010 is $ 5145.6 ;

our solutions in this segment include: .

revenues by segment the table below summarizes the revenues by our reporting segments ( in millions ) : .

Answer: 41%

Question: what percent of total consolidate revenue was the psg segment in 2011?

Answer: 42%

Answer: 42%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total consolidate revenue was the psg segment in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 42%.

Rejected response: 41%.

Question: what percent of total consolidate revenue was the psg segment in 2011?

Answer: 42%

revenues by segment the table below summarizes the revenues by our reporting segments ( in millions ) : .

the total consolidated revenues of 2012 is $ 5807.6 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2011 is $ 5625.6 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2010 is $ 5145.6 ;

Answer: 42%

Question: what percent of total consolidate revenue was the psg segment in 2012?

Answer: 41%

Answer: 41%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of distribution sales where attributable to printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 58%.

Rejected response: 60%.

IP || what percent of distribution sales where attributable to printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment <TIME>?

Question: what percent of distribution sales where attributable to printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment in 2012?

Answer: 58%

in millions the sales of 2012 is $ 6040 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 6630 ; the sales of 2010 is $ 6735 ;

annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment totaled $ 3.5 billion in 2012 compared with $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 4.2 billion in 2010 , reflecting declining demand and the exiting of unprofitable businesses .

trade margins as a percent of sales for printing papers were relatively even with both 2011 and 2010 .

Answer: 58%

Question: what percent of distribution sales where attributable to printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment in 2011?

Answer: 60%

multiply(const_4, const_1000), divide(#0, 6630)

Answer: 60%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of distribution sales where attributable to printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 60%.

Rejected response: 58%.

Question: what percent of distribution sales where attributable to printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment in 2011?

Answer: 60%

multiply(const_4, const_1000), divide(#0, 6630)

in millions the sales of 2012 is $ 6040 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 6630 ; the sales of 2010 is $ 6735 ;

annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment totaled $ 3.5 billion in 2012 compared with $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 4.2 billion in 2010 , reflecting declining demand and the exiting of unprofitable businesses .

Answer: 60%

Question: what percent of distribution sales where attributable to printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment in 2012?

Answer: 58%

Answer: 58%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent increase in net cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 80.67%.

Rejected response: 9.93%.

IQV || what is the percent increase in net cash provided by operating activities <TIME>?

Question: what is the percent increase in net cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 80.67%

( in millions ) the net cash provided by operating activities of year ended december 31 , 2016 is $ 860 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of year ended december 31 , 2015 is $ 476 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of year ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 433 ;

we used the proceeds from the term loan under the receivables financing facility to repay in full the amount outstanding on the then outstanding revolving credit facility under its then outstanding senior secured credit agreement ( $ 150 million ) , to repay $ 25 million of the then outstanding term loan b-3 , to pay related fees and expenses and the remainder was used for general working capital purposes .

2016 compared to 2015 cash provided by operating activities increased $ 384 million in 2016 as compared to 2015 .

Answer: 80.67%

Question: what is the percent increase in net cash provided by operating activities from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 9.93%

the increase in cash provided by operating activities reflects the increase in net income as adjusted for non-cash items necessary to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities .

years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 cash flow from operating activities .

Answer: 9.93%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent increase in net cash provided by operating activities from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9.93%.

Rejected response: 80.67%.

Question: what is the percent increase in net cash provided by operating activities from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 9.93%

years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 cash flow from operating activities .

( in millions ) the net cash provided by operating activities of year ended december 31 , 2016 is $ 860 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of year ended december 31 , 2015 is $ 476 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of year ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 433 ;

2016 compared to 2015 cash provided by operating activities increased $ 384 million in 2016 as compared to 2015 .

Answer: 9.93%

Question: what is the percent increase in net cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 80.67%

we used the proceeds from the term loan under the receivables financing facility to repay in full the amount outstanding on the then outstanding revolving credit facility under its then outstanding senior secured credit agreement ( $ 150 million ) , to repay $ 25 million of the then outstanding term loan b-3 , to pay related fees and expenses and the remainder was used for general working capital purposes .

Answer: 80.67%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due after 2019?
Reference time interval: 2019-01-01 00:00:00 to 2020-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 40%.

Rejected response: 43%.

GS || what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due after <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due after 2019?

Answer: 40%

$ in millions the 2020 - thereafter of as of december 2014 is 870 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2014 is $ 2173 ;

the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals .

$ in millions the 2019 of as of december 2014 is 190 ;

Answer: 40%

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due after 2017?

Answer: 43%

in millions the 2018 - thereafter of as of december 2012 is 1375 ;

in millions the total of as of december 2012 is $ 3189 ;

in millions the 2017 of as of december 2012 is 306 ;

Answer: 43%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due after 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 43%.

Rejected response: 40%.

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due after 2017?

Answer: 43%

in millions the 2017 of as of december 2012 is 306 ;

in millions the 2018 - thereafter of as of december 2012 is 1375 ;

in millions the total of as of december 2012 is $ 3189 ;

Answer: 43%

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due after 2019?

Answer: 40%

$ in millions the 2019 of as of december 2014 is 190 ;

$ in millions the 2020 - thereafter of as of december 2014 is 870 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2014 is $ 2173 ;

Answer: 40%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in millions of amortization expense between 2015 and 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -.9.

Rejected response: 5.4.

UAA || what was the difference in millions of amortization expense <TIME>?

Question: what was the difference in millions of amortization expense between 2015 and 2016?

Answer: -.9

amortization expense , which is included in selling , general and administrative expenses , was $ 13.0 million , $ 13.9 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

the following is the estimated amortization expense for the company 2019s intangible assets as of december 31 , 2016 : ( in thousands ) .

2017 The amortization expense of intangible assets of $ 10509 is $ 58370 ;

2017 the amortization expense of intangible assets of $ 10509 is $ 58370 ;

Answer: -.9

Question: what was the difference in millions of amortization expense between 2014 and 2015?

Answer: 5.4

at december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company determined that its goodwill and indefinite- lived intangible assets were not impaired .

Answer: 5.4


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in millions of amortization expense between 2014 and 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5.4.

Rejected response: -.9.

Question: what was the difference in millions of amortization expense between 2014 and 2015?

Answer: 5.4

amortization expense , which is included in selling , general and administrative expenses , was $ 13.0 million , $ 13.9 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

the following is the estimated amortization expense for the company 2019s intangible assets as of december 31 , 2016 : ( in thousands ) .

2017 the amortization expense of intangible assets of $ 10509 is $ 58370 ;

Answer: 5.4

Question: what was the difference in millions of amortization expense between 2015 and 2016?

Answer: -.9

Answer: -.9


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in net periodic pension expense between 2004 and 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 119%.

Rejected response: 55%.

IP || what is the percentage change in net periodic pension expense <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in net periodic pension expense between 2004 and 2005?

Answer: 119%

in millions the net periodic pension expense ( a ) of 2006 is $ 377 ; the net periodic pension expense ( a ) of 2005 is $ 243 ; the net periodic pension expense ( a ) of 2004 is $ 111 ;

net periodic pension expense for qualified and nonqualified u.s .

net periodic pension expense service cost is the actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the plans 2019 benefit formula to services rendered by employees during the year .

( a ) excludes $ 9.1 million , $ 6.5 million and $ 3.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 8.7 million , $ 3.6 million and $ 1.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , of termination benefits , in connection with cost reduction programs and facility rationalizations that were recorded in restructuring and other charges in the con- solidated statement of operations .

also excludes $ 77.2 million and $ 14.3 million in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 18.6 million and $ 7.6 million of termination bene- fits in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , related to certain divest- itures recorded in net losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale in the consolidated statement of oper- ations. .

Answer: 119%

Question: what is the percentage change in net periodic pension expense between 2005 and 2006?

Answer: 55%

Answer: 55%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in net periodic pension expense between 2005 and 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 55%.

Rejected response: 119%.

Question: what is the percentage change in net periodic pension expense between 2005 and 2006?

Answer: 55%

in millions the net periodic pension expense ( a ) of 2006 is $ 377 ; the net periodic pension expense ( a ) of 2005 is $ 243 ; the net periodic pension expense ( a ) of 2004 is $ 111 ;

( a ) excludes $ 9.1 million , $ 6.5 million and $ 3.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 8.7 million , $ 3.6 million and $ 1.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , of termination benefits , in connection with cost reduction programs and facility rationalizations that were recorded in restructuring and other charges in the con- solidated statement of operations .

also excludes $ 77.2 million and $ 14.3 million in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 18.6 million and $ 7.6 million of termination bene- fits in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , related to certain divest- itures recorded in net losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale in the consolidated statement of oper- ations. .

Answer: 55%

Question: what is the percentage change in net periodic pension expense between 2004 and 2005?

Answer: 119%

Answer: 119%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate of operating expenses from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5.3%.

Rejected response: 52.2%.

LMT || what is the growth rate of operating expenses <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate of operating expenses from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: -5.3%

( in millions ) the net sales of 2010 is $ 8246 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 8654 ; the net sales of 2008 is $ 8027 ;

( in millions ) the operating profit of 2010 is 972 ; the operating profit of 2009 is 972 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 953 ;

operating profit for the segment decreased by 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 .

divide(subtract(subtract(8246, 972), subtract(8654, 972)), subtract(8654, 972))

( in millions ) the operating margin of 2010 is 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2009 is 11.2% ( 11.2 % ) ; the operating margin of 2008 is 11.9% ( 11.9 % ) ;

Answer: -5.3%

Question: what is the growth rate of operating expenses from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 52.2%

the net sales of 2016 is $ 13462 ; the net sales of 2015 is $ 9091 ; the net sales of 2014 is $ 8732 ;

the operating profit of 2016 is 906 ; the operating profit of 2015 is 844 ; the operating profit of 2014 is 936 ;

the operating margin of 2016 is 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) ; the operating margin of 2015 is 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) ; the operating margin of 2014 is 10.7% ( 10.7 % ) ;

divide(subtract(subtract(13462, 906), subtract(9091, 844)), subtract(9091, 844))

Answer: 52.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate of operating expenses from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 52.2%.

Rejected response: -5.3%.

Question: what is the growth rate of operating expenses from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 52.2%

divide(subtract(subtract(13462, 906), subtract(9091, 844)), subtract(9091, 844))

the net sales of 2016 is $ 13462 ; the net sales of 2015 is $ 9091 ; the net sales of 2014 is $ 8732 ;

the operating profit of 2016 is 906 ; the operating profit of 2015 is 844 ; the operating profit of 2014 is 936 ;

the operating margin of 2016 is 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) ; the operating margin of 2015 is 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) ; the operating margin of 2014 is 10.7% ( 10.7 % ) ;

Answer: 52.2%

Question: what is the growth rate of operating expenses from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: -5.3%

divide(subtract(subtract(8246, 972), subtract(8654, 972)), subtract(8654, 972))

( in millions ) the net sales of 2010 is $ 8246 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 8654 ; the net sales of 2008 is $ 8027 ;

( in millions ) the operating profit of 2010 is 972 ; the operating profit of 2009 is 972 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 953 ;

( in millions ) the operating margin of 2010 is 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2009 is 11.2% ( 11.2 % ) ; the operating margin of 2008 is 11.9% ( 11.9 % ) ;

Answer: -5.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the price of espp shares purchased from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -13.2%.

Rejected response: 33.9%.

AMT || what is the growth rate in the price of espp shares purchased <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of espp shares purchased from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -13.2%

the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2008 , 2007 and 2006 were $ 7.89 , $ 9.09 and $ 6.79 , respectively .

The weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2008 is 2.58% ( 2.58 % ) ; The weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2007 is 5.02% ( 5.02 % ) ; The weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2006 is 5.08% ( 5.08 % ) ;

during the 2008 , 2007 and 2006 offering periods employees purchased 55764 , 48886 and 53210 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 30.08 , $ 33.93 and $ 24.98 , respectively .

stock repurchase programs 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 18.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 697.1 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase programs , as described below. .

Answer: -13.2%

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of espp shares purchased from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 33.9%

Answer: 33.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the price of espp shares purchased from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 33.9%.

Rejected response: -13.2%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of espp shares purchased from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 33.9%

during the 2008 , 2007 and 2006 offering periods employees purchased 55764 , 48886 and 53210 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 30.08 , $ 33.93 and $ 24.98 , respectively .

the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2008 , 2007 and 2006 were $ 7.89 , $ 9.09 and $ 6.79 , respectively .

stock repurchase programs 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 18.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 697.1 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase programs , as described below. .

Answer: 33.9%

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of espp shares purchased from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -13.2%

Answer: -13.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by what percentage point did the net income margin improve in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.3.

Rejected response: 4.0.

ETR || by what percentage point did the net income margin improve <TIME>?

Question: by what percentage point did the net income margin improve in 2011?

Answer: 1.3

the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 933.4 ;

management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .

results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 12.3 million primarily due to lower interest expense and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 37.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher taxes other than income taxes .

Answer: 1.3

Question: by what percentage point did the net income margin improve in 2010?

Answer: 4.0

the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 933.6 ;

Answer: 4.0


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by what percentage point did the net income margin improve in 2010?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.0.

Rejected response: 1.3.

Question: by what percentage point did the net income margin improve in 2010?

Answer: 4.0

management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .

results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 12.3 million primarily due to lower interest expense and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 37.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher taxes other than income taxes .

the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 933.6 ;

Answer: 4.0

Question: by what percentage point did the net income margin improve in 2011?

Answer: 1.3

the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 933.4 ;

Answer: 1.3


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in revenue for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method between 1998 and 1999?
Reference time interval: 1998-01-01 00:00:00 to 2000-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -26%.

Rejected response: 5%.

AES || what was the change in revenue for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in revenue for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method between 1998 and 1999?

Answer: -26%

as of and for the years ended december 31 , the revenues of 2000 is $ 6241 ; the revenues of 1999 is $ 5960 ; the revenues of 1998 is $ 8091 ;

the following table presents summarized financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method: .

the company accounts for this investment using the equity method based on the related consortium agreement that allows the exercise of significant influence .

as of and for the years ended december 31, the stockholder's equity of 2000 is 6206 ; the stockholder's equity of 1999 is 6445 ; the stockholder's equity of 1998 is 9572 ;

Answer: -26%

Question: what was the change in revenue for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method between 1999 and 2000?

Answer: 5%

Answer: 5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in revenue for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method between 1999 and 2000?
Reference time interval: 1999-01-01 00:00:00 to 2001-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5%.

Rejected response: -26%.

Question: what was the change in revenue for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method between 1999 and 2000?

Answer: 5%

the following table presents summarized financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method: .

as of and for the years ended december 31 , the revenues of 2000 is $ 6241 ; the revenues of 1999 is $ 5960 ; the revenues of 1998 is $ 8091 ;

as of and for the years ended december 31, the stockholder's equity of 2000 is 6206 ; the stockholder's equity of 1999 is 6445 ; the stockholder's equity of 1998 is 9572 ;

Answer: 5%

Question: what was the change in revenue for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method between 1998 and 1999?

Answer: -26%

Answer: -26%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the profit margin in december 2016
Reference time interval: 2016-12-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.3%.

Rejected response: 7.7%.

LMT || what was the profit margin <TIME>

Question: what was the profit margin in december 2016

Answer: 13.3%

net sales the operating profit of $ 3410 is 454 ;

these net pension costs were $ 54 million for the year ended december 31 , 2016 .

net sales The gross profit of $ 3410 is 438 ;

net sales the cost of sales of $ 3410 is -2953 ( 2953 ) ;

net sales the gross profit of $ 3410 is 438 ;

Answer: 13.3%

Question: what was the profit margin in 2004

Answer: 7.7%

( in millions ) the net sales of 2006 is $ 7923 ; the net sales of 2005 is $ 6820 ; the net sales of 2004 is $ 6359 ;

( in millions ) the operating profit of 2006 is 746 ; the operating profit of 2005 is 609 ; the operating profit of 2004 is 489 ;

operating profit for the segment increased by 15% ( 15 % ) in 2005 compared to 2004 .

( in millions ) the backlog at year-end of 2006 is 18768 ; the backlog at year-end of 2005 is 15925 ; the backlog at year-end of 2004 is 16112 ;

Answer: 7.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the profit margin in 2004
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7.7%.

Rejected response: 13.3%.

Question: what was the profit margin in 2004

Answer: 7.7%

( in millions ) the net sales of 2006 is $ 7923 ; the net sales of 2005 is $ 6820 ; the net sales of 2004 is $ 6359 ;

( in millions ) the operating profit of 2006 is 746 ; the operating profit of 2005 is 609 ; the operating profit of 2004 is 489 ;

( in millions ) the backlog at year-end of 2006 is 18768 ; the backlog at year-end of 2005 is 15925 ; the backlog at year-end of 2004 is 16112 ;

Answer: 7.7%

Question: what was the profit margin in december 2016

Answer: 13.3%

net sales the cost of sales of $ 3410 is -2953 ( 2953 ) ;

net sales the gross profit of $ 3410 is 438 ;

net sales the operating profit of $ 3410 is 454 ;

Answer: 13.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the net change in diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations between 2008 and 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: $ 4.57.

Rejected response: ( $ 5.83 ).

IP || what was the net change in diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations <TIME>?

Question: what was the net change in diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: $ 4.57

in millions except per share amounts the diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations of 2009 is $ 1.55 ; the diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations of 2008 is $ -3.02 ( 3.02 ) ; the diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations of 2007 is $ 2.81 ;

in millions except per share amounts The basic earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations of 2009 is $ 1.56 ; The basic earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations of 2008 is $ -3.02 ( 3.02 ) ; The basic earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations of 2007 is $ 2.83 ;

in millions except per share amounts The earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations of 2009 is $ 663 ; The earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations of 2008 is $ -1269 ( 1269 ) ; The earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations of 2007 is $ 1215 ;

in millions except per share amounts the earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations of 2009 is $ 663 ; the earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations of 2008 is $ -1269 ( 1269 ) ; the earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations of 2007 is $ 1215 ;

( b ) options to purchase 22.2 million , 25.1 million and 17.5 million shares for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , were not included in the computation of diluted common shares outstanding because their exercise price exceeded the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for each respective reporting date .

Answer: $ 4.57

Question: what was the net change in diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations between 2007 and 2008?

Answer: ( $ 5.83 )

Answer: ( $ 5.83 )


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the net change in diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations between 2007 and 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: ( $ 5.83 ).

Rejected response: $ 4.57.

Question: what was the net change in diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations between 2007 and 2008?

Answer: ( $ 5.83 )

in millions except per share amounts the earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations of 2009 is $ 663 ; the earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations of 2008 is $ -1269 ( 1269 ) ; the earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations of 2007 is $ 1215 ;

in millions except per share amounts the diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations of 2009 is $ 1.55 ; the diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations of 2008 is $ -3.02 ( 3.02 ) ; the diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations of 2007 is $ 2.81 ;

( b ) options to purchase 22.2 million , 25.1 million and 17.5 million shares for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , were not included in the computation of diluted common shares outstanding because their exercise price exceeded the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for each respective reporting date .

Answer: ( $ 5.83 )

Question: what was the net change in diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: $ 4.57

Answer: $ 4.57


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits between 2010 and 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 46%.

Rejected response: 50%.

AAPL || what was the percentage change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits between 2010 and 2011?

Answer: 46%

the ending balance of 2012 is $ 2062 ; the ending balance of 2011 is $ 1375 ; the ending balance of 2010 is $ 943 ;

the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , is as follows ( in millions ) : .

the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes .

the beginning balance of 2012 is $ 1375 ; the beginning balance of 2011 is $ 943 ; the beginning balance of 2010 is $ 971 ;

Answer: 46%

Question: what was the percentage change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: 50%

as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 401 million and $ 261 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets .

Answer: 50%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits between 2011 and 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 50%.

Rejected response: 46%.

Question: what was the percentage change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: 50%

the beginning balance of 2012 is $ 1375 ; the beginning balance of 2011 is $ 943 ; the beginning balance of 2010 is $ 971 ;

the ending balance of 2012 is $ 2062 ; the ending balance of 2011 is $ 1375 ; the ending balance of 2010 is $ 943 ;

as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 401 million and $ 261 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets .

Answer: 50%

Question: what was the percentage change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits between 2010 and 2011?

Answer: 46%

the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , is as follows ( in millions ) : .

Answer: 46%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in inventory between 2006 and 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 28%.

Rejected response: 64%.

AAPL || what was the percentage change in inventory <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in inventory between 2006 and 2007?

Answer: 28%

the inventory of september 29 2007 is $ 346 ; the inventory of september 30 2006 is $ 270 ; the inventory of september 24 2005 is $ 165 ;

in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no .

as of september 29 , 2007 , the company had $ 15.4 billion in cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments , an increase of $ 5.3 billion over the same balance at the end of september 30 , 2006 .

the accounts receivable net of september 29 2007 is $ 1637 ; the accounts receivable net of september 30 2006 is $ 1252 ; the accounts receivable net of september 24 2005 is $ 895 ;

the annual operating cash flow of september 29 2007 is $ 5470 ; the annual operating cash flow of september 30 2006 is $ 2220 ; the annual operating cash flow of september 24 2005 is $ 2535 ;

Answer: 28%

Question: what was the percentage change in inventory between 2005 and 2006?

Answer: 64%

liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics for each of the last three fiscal years ( dollars in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 .

Answer: 64%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in inventory between 2005 and 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 64%.

Rejected response: 28%.

Question: what was the percentage change in inventory between 2005 and 2006?

Answer: 64%

the accounts receivable net of september 29 2007 is $ 1637 ; the accounts receivable net of september 30 2006 is $ 1252 ; the accounts receivable net of september 24 2005 is $ 895 ;

the inventory of september 29 2007 is $ 346 ; the inventory of september 30 2006 is $ 270 ; the inventory of september 24 2005 is $ 165 ;

the annual operating cash flow of september 29 2007 is $ 5470 ; the annual operating cash flow of september 30 2006 is $ 2220 ; the annual operating cash flow of september 24 2005 is $ 2535 ;

Answer: 64%

Question: what was the percentage change in inventory between 2006 and 2007?

Answer: 28%

Answer: 28%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the potential gain if the notes and other long-term assets had been sold at the end of 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 38.

Rejected response: 68.

MAR || what is the potential gain if the notes and other long-term assets had been sold at the end of <TIME>?

Question: what is the potential gain if the notes and other long-term assets had been sold at the end of 2005?

Answer: 38

Explanation: this represents an un realized asset on the balance sheet and would be a gain to the company if sold at fair value .

( $ in millions ) the notes and other long-term assets of 2005 carrying amount is $ 1374 ; the notes and other long-term assets of 2005 fair value is $ 1412 ; the notes and other long-term assets of 2005 carrying amount is $ 1702 ; the notes and other long-term assets of fair value is $ 1770 ;

( $ in millions ) The long-term debt and other long-term liabilities of 2005 carrying amount is $ 1636 ; The long-term debt and other long-term liabilities of 2005 fair value is $ 1685 ; The long-term debt and other long-term liabilities of 2005 carrying amount is $ 848 ; The long-term debt and other long-term liabilities of fair value is $ 875 ;

we determine valuations for long-term debt and other long-term liabilities based on quoted market prices or expected future payments dis- counted at risk-adjusted rates .

the fair values of non-current financial assets , liabilities and derivatives are shown in the following table. .

the total amount for these swaps was recorded in other comprehensive income and was a net loss of $ 2 million during 2005 , which will be amortized to interest expense using the interest method over the life of the notes .

Answer: 38

Question: what is the potential gain if the notes and other long-term assets had been sold at the end of 2004?

Answer: 68

Answer: 68


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the potential gain if the notes and other long-term assets had been sold at the end of 2004?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 68.

Rejected response: 38.

Question: what is the potential gain if the notes and other long-term assets had been sold at the end of 2004?

Answer: 68

the fair values of non-current financial assets , liabilities and derivatives are shown in the following table. .

( $ in millions ) the notes and other long-term assets of 2005 carrying amount is $ 1374 ; the notes and other long-term assets of 2005 fair value is $ 1412 ; the notes and other long-term assets of 2005 carrying amount is $ 1702 ; the notes and other long-term assets of fair value is $ 1770 ;

the total amount for these swaps was recorded in other comprehensive income and was a net loss of $ 2 million during 2005 , which will be amortized to interest expense using the interest method over the life of the notes .

Answer: 68

Question: what is the potential gain if the notes and other long-term assets had been sold at the end of 2005?

Answer: 38

Explanation: this represents an un realized asset on the balance sheet and would be a gain to the company if sold at fair value .

Answer: 38


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of gce in 2011 is in non-u.s . dollar-denominated assets?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 24%.

Rejected response: 27%.

GS || what percentage of gce <TIME> is in non-u.s . dollar-denominated assets?

Question: what percentage of gce in 2011 is in non-u.s . dollar-denominated assets?

Answer: 24%

in millions the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 125111 ; the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2011 is $ 125668 ;

in millions the total of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 172095 ; the total of average for theyear ended december 2011 is $ 165959 ;

in millions the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is 46984 ; the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2011 is 40291 ;

Answer: 24%

Question: what percentage of gce in 2012 is in non-u.s . dollar-denominated assets?

Answer: 27%

Answer: 27%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of gce in 2012 is in non-u.s . dollar-denominated assets?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 27%.

Rejected response: 24%.

Question: what percentage of gce in 2012 is in non-u.s . dollar-denominated assets?

Answer: 27%

in millions the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 125111 ; the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2011 is $ 125668 ;

in millions the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is 46984 ; the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2011 is 40291 ;

in millions the total of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 172095 ; the total of average for theyear ended december 2011 is $ 165959 ;

Answer: 27%

Question: what percentage of gce in 2011 is in non-u.s . dollar-denominated assets?

Answer: 24%

Answer: 24%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in accrued warranties and related costs from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -19%.

Rejected response: 51%.

AAPL || what was the percentage change in accrued warranties and related costs <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in accrued warranties and related costs from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -19%

the ending accrued warranty and related costs of 2007 is $ 230 ; the ending accrued warranty and related costs of 2006 is $ 284 ; the ending accrued warranty and related costs of 2005 is $ 188 ;

The beginning accrued warranty and related costs of 2007 is $ 284 ; The beginning accrued warranty and related costs of 2006 is $ 188 ; The beginning accrued warranty and related costs of 2005 is $ 105 ;

The accruals for product warranties of 2007 is 227 ; The accruals for product warranties of 2006 is 363 ; The accruals for product warranties of 2005 is 271 ;

notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 2014commitments and contingencies ( continued ) the following table reconciles changes in the company 2019s accrued warranties and related costs ( in millions ) : .

the beginning accrued warranty and related costs of 2007 is $ 284 ; the beginning accrued warranty and related costs of 2006 is $ 188 ; the beginning accrued warranty and related costs of 2005 is $ 105 ;

Answer: -19%

Question: what was the percentage change in accrued warranties and related costs from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 51%

Answer: 51%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in accrued warranties and related costs from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 51%.

Rejected response: -19%.

Question: what was the percentage change in accrued warranties and related costs from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 51%

notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 2014commitments and contingencies ( continued ) the following table reconciles changes in the company 2019s accrued warranties and related costs ( in millions ) : .

the beginning accrued warranty and related costs of 2007 is $ 284 ; the beginning accrued warranty and related costs of 2006 is $ 188 ; the beginning accrued warranty and related costs of 2005 is $ 105 ;

the ending accrued warranty and related costs of 2007 is $ 230 ; the ending accrued warranty and related costs of 2006 is $ 284 ; the ending accrued warranty and related costs of 2005 is $ 188 ;

Answer: 51%

Question: what was the percentage change in accrued warranties and related costs from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -19%

Answer: -19%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in non-cash stock-based compensation expense from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -13%.

Rejected response: 14%.

LMT || what was the percentage change in non-cash stock-based compensation expense <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in non-cash stock-based compensation expense from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -13%

note 11 2013 stock-based compensation during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense totaling $ 164 million , $ 189 million and $ 167 million , which is included as a component of other unallocated , net on our statements of earnings .

at december 31 , 2014 , 7.8 million of the shares reserved for issuance remained available for grant under our stock-based compensation plans .

stock-based compensation plans under plans approved by our stockholders , we are authorized to grant key employees stock-based incentive awards , including options to purchase common stock , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) or other stock units .

the nonvested at december 31 2013 of number of rsus ( in thousands ) is 3859 ; the nonvested at december 31 2013 of weighted average grant-date fair value pershare is $ 82.42 ;

the nonvested at december 31 2014 of number of rsus ( in thousands ) is 2326 ; the nonvested at december 31 2014 of weighted average grant-date fair value pershare is $ 97.80 ;

Answer: -13%

Question: what was the percentage change in non-cash stock-based compensation expense from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 14%

we received cash from the exercise of stock options totaling $ 308 million , $ 827 million and $ 440 million during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 .

in addition , our income tax liabilities for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were reduced by $ 215 million , $ 158 million , $ 96 million due to recognized tax benefits on stock-based compensation arrangements .

the nonvested at december 31 2012 of number of rsus ( in thousands ) is 4822 ; the nonvested at december 31 2012 of weighted average grant-date fair value pershare is $ 79.10 ;

Answer: 14%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in non-cash stock-based compensation expense from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 14%.

Rejected response: -13%.

Question: what was the percentage change in non-cash stock-based compensation expense from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 14%

note 11 2013 stock-based compensation during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense totaling $ 164 million , $ 189 million and $ 167 million , which is included as a component of other unallocated , net on our statements of earnings .

the nonvested at december 31 2012 of number of rsus ( in thousands ) is 4822 ; the nonvested at december 31 2012 of weighted average grant-date fair value pershare is $ 79.10 ;

the nonvested at december 31 2013 of number of rsus ( in thousands ) is 3859 ; the nonvested at december 31 2013 of weighted average grant-date fair value pershare is $ 82.42 ;

Answer: 14%

Question: what was the percentage change in non-cash stock-based compensation expense from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -13%

the nonvested at december 31 2014 of number of rsus ( in thousands ) is 2326 ; the nonvested at december 31 2014 of weighted average grant-date fair value pershare is $ 97.80 ;

Answer: -13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in cash from operations between 2009 and 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 33%.

Rejected response: 35%.

MAR || what was the percentage change in cash from operations <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in cash from operations between 2009 and 2010?

Answer: 33%

( $ in millions ) the cash from operations of 2010 is $ 1151 ; the cash from operations of 2009 is $ 868 ; the cash from operations of 2008 is $ 641 ;

cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 .

we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements .

Answer: 33%

Question: what was the percentage change in cash from operations between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: 35%

Answer: 35%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in cash from operations between 2008 and 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 35%.

Rejected response: 33%.

Question: what was the percentage change in cash from operations between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: 35%

we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements .

cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 .

( $ in millions ) the cash from operations of 2010 is $ 1151 ; the cash from operations of 2009 is $ 868 ; the cash from operations of 2008 is $ 641 ;

Answer: 35%

Question: what was the percentage change in cash from operations between 2009 and 2010?

Answer: 33%

Answer: 33%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb for the five year period ended december 31 , 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -27.1%.

Rejected response: 37.83%.

DISCA || what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb for the five year period ended december 31 , <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb for the five year period ended december 31 , 2018?

Answer: -27.1%

subtract(72.90, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the discb of december 312013 is $ 100.00 ; the discb of december 312014 is $ 80.56 ; the discb of december 312015 is $ 58.82 ; the discb of december 312016 is $ 63.44 ; the discb of december 312017 is $ 53.97 ; the discb of december 312018 is $ 72.90 ;

december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

and excluding both acquired companies for the entire five year period .

the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2013 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 .

Answer: -27.1%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb for the five year period ended december 31 , 2016?

Answer: 37.83%

subtract(137.83, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the discb of december 312011 is $ 100.00 ; the discb of december 312012 is $ 150.40 ; the discb of december 312013 is $ 217.35 ; the discb of december 312014 is $ 175.04 ; the discb of december 312015 is $ 127.80 ; the discb of december 312016 is $ 137.83 ;

the selected statement of operations information for each of the two years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 and the selected balance sheet information as of december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 have been derived from financial statements not included in this annual report on form 10-k .

the disck of december 312011 is $ 100.00 ; the disck of december 312012 is $ 155.17 ; the disck of december 312013 is $ 222.44 ; the disck of december 312014 is $ 178.89 ; the disck of december 312015 is $ 133.79 ; the disck of december 312016 is $ 142.07 ;

Answer: 37.83%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb for the five year period ended december 31 , 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 37.83%.

Rejected response: -27.1%.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb for the five year period ended december 31 , 2016?

Answer: 37.83%

subtract(137.83, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the discb of december 312011 is $ 100.00 ; the discb of december 312012 is $ 150.40 ; the discb of december 312013 is $ 217.35 ; the discb of december 312014 is $ 175.04 ; the discb of december 312015 is $ 127.80 ; the discb of december 312016 is $ 137.83 ;

the disck of december 312011 is $ 100.00 ; the disck of december 312012 is $ 155.17 ; the disck of december 312013 is $ 222.44 ; the disck of december 312014 is $ 178.89 ; the disck of december 312015 is $ 133.79 ; the disck of december 312016 is $ 142.07 ;

Answer: 37.83%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb for the five year period ended december 31 , 2018?

Answer: -27.1%

subtract(72.90, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2013 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 .

the discb of december 312013 is $ 100.00 ; the discb of december 312014 is $ 80.56 ; the discb of december 312015 is $ 58.82 ; the discb of december 312016 is $ 63.44 ; the discb of december 312017 is $ 53.97 ; the discb of december 312018 is $ 72.90 ;

Answer: -27.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of the 2015 ratings profile of derivative receivables had a rating equivalent for junk ratings?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 19.

Rejected response: 20.

JPM || what percentage of the <TIME> ratings profile of derivative receivables had a rating equivalent for junk ratings?

Question: what percentage of the 2015 ratings profile of derivative receivables had a rating equivalent for junk ratings?

Answer: 19

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 7308 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 18 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of exposure net of all collateral is 7500 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 17 ;

ratings profile of derivative receivables rating equivalent 2016 2015 ( a ) december 31 , ( in millions , except ratios ) exposure net of all collateral % (  % ) of exposure net of all collateral exposure net of all collateral % (  % ) of exposure net of all collateral .

exposure profile of derivatives measures december 31 , 2016 ( in billions ) the following table summarizes the ratings profile by derivative counterparty of the firm 2019s derivative receivables , including credit derivatives , net of all collateral , at the dates indicated .

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 984 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 2 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of exposure net of all collateral is 824 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 2 ;

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the total of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is $ 41373 ; the total of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the total of exposure net of all collateral is $ 43097 ; the total of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 100% ( 100 % ) ;

Answer: 19

Question: what percentage of the 2016 ratings profile of derivative receivables had a rating equivalent for junk ratings?

Answer: 20

Explanation: junk is below bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3

Answer: 20


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of the 2016 ratings profile of derivative receivables had a rating equivalent for junk ratings?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 20.

Rejected response: 19.

Question: what percentage of the 2016 ratings profile of derivative receivables had a rating equivalent for junk ratings?

Answer: 20

Explanation: junk is below bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 7308 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 18 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of exposure net of all collateral is 7500 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 17 ;

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 984 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 2 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of exposure net of all collateral is 824 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 2 ;

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the total of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is $ 41373 ; the total of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the total of exposure net of all collateral is $ 43097 ; the total of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 100% ( 100 % ) ;

Answer: 20

Question: what percentage of the 2015 ratings profile of derivative receivables had a rating equivalent for junk ratings?

Answer: 19

Answer: 19


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: unrecognized tax benefits change by what percent between 2017 and 2018?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17%.

Rejected response: 92%.

IP || unrecognized tax benefits change by what percent <TIME>?

Question: unrecognized tax benefits change by what percent between 2017 and 2018?

Answer: 17%

in millions the balance at december 31 of 2018 is $ -220 ( 220 ) ; the balance at december 31 of 2017 is $ -188 ( 188 ) ; the balance at december 31 of 2016 is $ -98 ( 98 ) ;

the company accrues interest on unrecognized tax benefits as a component of interest expense .

a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is as follows: .

in millions the balance at january 1 of 2018 is $ -188 ( 188 ) ; the balance at january 1 of 2017 is $ -98 ( 98 ) ; the balance at january 1 of 2016 is $ -150 ( 150 ) ;

Answer: 17%

Question: unrecognized tax benefits change by what percent between 2016 and 2017?

Answer: 92%

Answer: 92%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: unrecognized tax benefits change by what percent between 2016 and 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 92%.

Rejected response: 17%.

Question: unrecognized tax benefits change by what percent between 2016 and 2017?

Answer: 92%

a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is as follows: .

in millions the balance at january 1 of 2018 is $ -188 ( 188 ) ; the balance at january 1 of 2017 is $ -98 ( 98 ) ; the balance at january 1 of 2016 is $ -150 ( 150 ) ;

in millions the balance at december 31 of 2018 is $ -220 ( 220 ) ; the balance at december 31 of 2017 is $ -188 ( 188 ) ; the balance at december 31 of 2016 is $ -98 ( 98 ) ;

Answer: 92%

Question: unrecognized tax benefits change by what percent between 2017 and 2018?

Answer: 17%

Answer: 17%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities due in 2010 are related to citigroup funding inc . ?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: 20%.

C || what percentage of total aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities due <TIME> are related to citigroup funding inc . ?

Question: what percentage of total aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities due in 2010 are related to citigroup funding inc . ?

Answer: 13%

in millions of dollars the citigroup funding inc . of 2009 is 17632 ; the citigroup funding inc . of 2010 is 5381 ; the citigroup funding inc . of 2011 is 2154 ; the citigroup funding inc . of 2012 is 1253 ; the citigroup funding inc . of 2013 is 3790 ; the citigroup funding inc . of thereafter is 7164 ;

in millions of dollars the total of 2009 is $ 88472 ; the total of 2010 is $ 41431 ; the total of 2011 is $ 42112 ; the total of 2012 is $ 27999 ; the total of 2013 is $ 25955 ; the total of thereafter is $ 133624 ;

aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities are as follows : in millions of dollars 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 thereafter .

Answer: 13%

Question: what percentage of total aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities due in 2009 are related to citigroup funding inc . ?

Answer: 20%

Answer: 20%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities due in 2009 are related to citigroup funding inc . ?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 20%.

Rejected response: 13%.

Question: what percentage of total aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities due in 2009 are related to citigroup funding inc . ?

Answer: 20%

aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities are as follows : in millions of dollars 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 thereafter .

in millions of dollars the citigroup funding inc . of 2009 is 17632 ; the citigroup funding inc . of 2010 is 5381 ; the citigroup funding inc . of 2011 is 2154 ; the citigroup funding inc . of 2012 is 1253 ; the citigroup funding inc . of 2013 is 3790 ; the citigroup funding inc . of thereafter is 7164 ;

in millions of dollars the total of 2009 is $ 88472 ; the total of 2010 is $ 41431 ; the total of 2011 is $ 42112 ; the total of 2012 is $ 27999 ; the total of 2013 is $ 25955 ; the total of thereafter is $ 133624 ;

Answer: 20%

Question: what percentage of total aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities due in 2010 are related to citigroup funding inc . ?

Answer: 13%

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2004 for entergy corporation?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 29.5.

Rejected response: 4.9.

ETR || what is the net change in net revenue <TIME> for entergy corporation?

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2004 for entergy corporation?

Answer: 29.5

the 2003 net revenue of ( in millions ) is $ 4214.5 ;

the 2004 net revenue of ( in millions ) is $ 4244.0 ;

following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

Answer: 29.5

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2003 for entergy corporation?

Answer: 4.9

the 2002 net revenue of ( in millions ) is $ 4209.6 ;

following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

Answer: 4.9


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2003 for entergy corporation?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.9.

Rejected response: 29.5.

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2003 for entergy corporation?

Answer: 4.9

following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

the 2002 net revenue of ( in millions ) is $ 4209.6 ;

the 2003 net revenue of ( in millions ) is $ 4214.5 ;

Answer: 4.9

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2004 for entergy corporation?

Answer: 29.5

following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

the 2004 net revenue of ( in millions ) is $ 4244.0 ;

Answer: 29.5


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 283.

Rejected response: 323.

HST || what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets <TIME>?

Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 283

balance at december 31 2014 the balance at december 31 2015 of $ 5283 is 5666 ;

balance at december 31 2014 the balance at december 31 2016 of $ 5283 is 5949 ;

schedule iii page 6 of 6 host hotels & resorts , inc. , and subsidiaries host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries real estate and accumulated depreciation december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) ( b ) the change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows: .

Answer: 283

Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 323

balance at december 31 2015 the balance at december 31 2016 of $ 5666 is 5949 ;

balance at december 31 2015 the balance at december 31 2017 of $ 5666 is 6272 ;

schedule iii page 6 of 6 host hotels & resorts , inc. , and subsidiaries host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries real estate and accumulated depreciation december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) ( b ) the change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is as follows: .

Answer: 323


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 283.

Rejected response: 383.

Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 283

schedule iii page 6 of 6 host hotels & resorts , inc. , and subsidiaries host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries real estate and accumulated depreciation december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) ( b ) the change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows: .

balance at december 31 2014 the balance at december 31 2015 of $ 5283 is 5666 ;

balance at december 31 2014 the balance at december 31 2016 of $ 5283 is 5949 ;

Answer: 283

Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 383

balance at december 31 2014 The depreciation and amortization of $ 5283 is 558 ;

balance at december 31 2014 the depreciation and amortization of $ 5283 is 572 ;

Answer: 383


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 323.

Rejected response: 283.

Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 323

schedule iii page 6 of 6 host hotels & resorts , inc. , and subsidiaries host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries real estate and accumulated depreciation december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) ( b ) the change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is as follows: .

balance at december 31 2015 the balance at december 31 2016 of $ 5666 is 5949 ;

balance at december 31 2015 the balance at december 31 2017 of $ 5666 is 6272 ;

Answer: 323

Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 283

schedule iii page 6 of 6 host hotels & resorts , inc. , and subsidiaries host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries real estate and accumulated depreciation december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) ( b ) the change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows: .

balance at december 31 2014 the balance at december 31 2015 of $ 5283 is 5666 ;

balance at december 31 2014 the balance at december 31 2016 of $ 5283 is 5949 ;

Answer: 283


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 323.

Rejected response: 383.

Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 323

schedule iii page 6 of 6 host hotels & resorts , inc. , and subsidiaries host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries real estate and accumulated depreciation december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) ( b ) the change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is as follows: .

balance at december 31 2015 the balance at december 31 2016 of $ 5666 is 5949 ;

balance at december 31 2015 the balance at december 31 2017 of $ 5666 is 6272 ;

Answer: 323

Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 383

schedule iii page 6 of 6 host hotels & resorts , inc. , and subsidiaries host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries real estate and accumulated depreciation december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) ( b ) the change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows: .

balance at december 31 2014 the balance at december 31 2015 of $ 5283 is 5666 ;

balance at december 31 2014 the depreciation and amortization of $ 5283 is 572 ;

Answer: 383


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 383.

Rejected response: 283.

Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 383

schedule iii page 6 of 6 host hotels & resorts , inc. , and subsidiaries host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries real estate and accumulated depreciation december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) ( b ) the change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows: .

balance at december 31 2014 the balance at december 31 2015 of $ 5283 is 5666 ;

balance at december 31 2014 the depreciation and amortization of $ 5283 is 572 ;

Answer: 383

Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 283

balance at december 31 2014 the balance at december 31 2016 of $ 5283 is 5949 ;

Answer: 283


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 383.

Rejected response: 323.

Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 383

schedule iii page 6 of 6 host hotels & resorts , inc. , and subsidiaries host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries real estate and accumulated depreciation december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) ( b ) the change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows: .

balance at december 31 2014 the balance at december 31 2015 of $ 5283 is 5666 ;

balance at december 31 2014 the depreciation and amortization of $ 5283 is 572 ;

Answer: 383

Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 323

schedule iii page 6 of 6 host hotels & resorts , inc. , and subsidiaries host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries real estate and accumulated depreciation december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) ( b ) the change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is as follows: .

balance at december 31 2015 the balance at december 31 2016 of $ 5666 is 5949 ;

balance at december 31 2015 the balance at december 31 2017 of $ 5666 is 6272 ;

Answer: 323


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the final amount of cash and cash equivalents in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -454.2.

Rejected response: 533.8.

APD || what is the final amount of cash and cash equivalents <TIME>?

Question: what is the final amount of cash and cash equivalents in 2018?

Answer: -454.2

Explanation: it is the operating activities minus the investing and financing activities of the year 2018 .

cash provided by ( used for ) the operating activities of 2018 is $ 2554.7 ; the operating activities of 2017 is $ 2534.1 ; the operating activities of 2016 is $ 2258.8 ;

cash provided by ( used for ) the investing activities of 2018 is -1649.1 ( 1649.1 ) ; the investing activities of 2017 is -1417.7 ( 1417.7 ) ; the investing activities of 2016 is -864.8 ( 864.8 ) ;

cash provided by ( used for ) the financing activities of 2018 is -1359.8 ( 1359.8 ) ; the financing activities of 2017 is -2040.9 ( 2040.9 ) ; the financing activities of 2016 is -860.2 ( 860.2 ) ;

Answer: -454.2

Question: what is the final amount of cash and cash equivalents in 2016?

Answer: 533.8

Explanation: it is the operating activities minus the investing and financing activities of the year 2016 .

Answer: 533.8


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the final amount of cash and cash equivalents in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 533.8.

Rejected response: -454.2.

Question: what is the final amount of cash and cash equivalents in 2016?

Answer: 533.8

Explanation: it is the operating activities minus the investing and financing activities of the year 2016 .

cash provided by ( used for ) the operating activities of 2018 is $ 2554.7 ; the operating activities of 2017 is $ 2534.1 ; the operating activities of 2016 is $ 2258.8 ;

cash provided by ( used for ) the investing activities of 2018 is -1649.1 ( 1649.1 ) ; the investing activities of 2017 is -1417.7 ( 1417.7 ) ; the investing activities of 2016 is -864.8 ( 864.8 ) ;

cash provided by ( used for ) the financing activities of 2018 is -1359.8 ( 1359.8 ) ; the financing activities of 2017 is -2040.9 ( 2040.9 ) ; the financing activities of 2016 is -860.2 ( 860.2 ) ;

Answer: 533.8

Question: what is the final amount of cash and cash equivalents in 2018?

Answer: -454.2

Explanation: it is the operating activities minus the investing and financing activities of the year 2018 .

Answer: -454.2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 16349.

Rejected response: 3339.

ETR || what is the net change in entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 16349

entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .

see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .

2016 the ( in thousands ) of 2015 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2014 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2013 is ( in thousands ) ;

Answer: 16349

Question: what is the net change in entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 3339

Answer: 3339


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3339.

Rejected response: 16349.

Question: what is the net change in entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 3339

entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .

2016 the ( in thousands ) of 2015 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2014 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2013 is ( in thousands ) ;

Answer: 3339

Question: what is the net change in entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 16349

Answer: 16349


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total amount spent for the purchased shares during december 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-12-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 187050.

Rejected response: 613009.2.

CE || what is the total amount spent for the purchased shares <TIME>?

Question: what is the total amount spent for the purchased shares during december 2005?

Answer: 187050

period the total of totalnumber ofshares ( or units ) purchased ( 1 ) is 10000 ; the total of averageprice paidper share ( orunit ) is $ 18.705 ; the total of total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased aspart ofpublicly announcedplans or programs is 10000 ; the total of maximumnumber ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) thatmayyet be purchased under theplans orprograms is 2014 ;

period The december1 2013 december 31 2005 of totalnumber ofshares ( or units ) purchased ( 1 ) is 10000 ; The december1 2013 december 31 2005 of averageprice paidper share ( orunit ) is $ 18.705 ; The december1 2013 december 31 2005 of total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased aspart ofpublicly announcedplans or programs is 10000 ; The december1 2013 december 31 2005 of maximumnumber ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) thatmayyet be purchased under theplans orprograms is 2014 ;

celanese purchases of its equity securities period number of shares ( or units ) purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share ( or unit ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs october 1 2013 october 31 , 2005 2014 2014 2014 2014 november 1 2013 november 30 , 2005 2014 2014 2014 2014 december 1 2013 december 31 , 2005 10000 $ 18.705 10000 2014 .

period the december1 2013 december 31 2005 of totalnumber ofshares ( or units ) purchased ( 1 ) is 10000 ; the december1 2013 december 31 2005 of averageprice paidper share ( orunit ) is $ 18.705 ; the december1 2013 december 31 2005 of total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased aspart ofpublicly announcedplans or programs is 10000 ; the december1 2013 december 31 2005 of maximumnumber ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) thatmayyet be purchased under theplans orprograms is 2014 ;

Answer: 187050

Question: what is the total amount spent for the purchased shares during october 2009?

Answer: 613009.2

period the october 1-31 2009 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 24980 ; the october 1-31 2009 of average price paid per share is $ 24.54 ; the october 1-31 2009 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program is - ; the october 1-31 2009 of approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program is $ 122300000.00 ;

period The december 1-31 2009 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 334 ; The december 1-31 2009 of average price paid per share is $ 32.03 ; The december 1-31 2009 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program is - ; The december 1-31 2009 of approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program is $ 122300000.00 ;

celanese purchases of its equity securities the table below sets forth information regarding repurchases of our series a common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2009 : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program .

period the november 1-30 2009 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is - ; the november 1-30 2009 of average price paid per share is $ - ; the november 1-30 2009 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program is - ; the november 1-30 2009 of approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program is $ 122300000.00 ;

period the december 1-31 2009 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 334 ; the december 1-31 2009 of average price paid per share is $ 32.03 ; the december 1-31 2009 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program is - ; the december 1-31 2009 of approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program is $ 122300000.00 ;

Answer: 613009.2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total amount spent for the purchased shares during october 2009?
Reference time interval: 2009-10-01 00:00:00 to 2009-11-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 613009.2.

Rejected response: 187050.

Question: what is the total amount spent for the purchased shares during october 2009?

Answer: 613009.2

period the october 1-31 2009 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 24980 ; the october 1-31 2009 of average price paid per share is $ 24.54 ; the october 1-31 2009 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program is - ; the october 1-31 2009 of approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program is $ 122300000.00 ;

period the november 1-30 2009 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is - ; the november 1-30 2009 of average price paid per share is $ - ; the november 1-30 2009 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program is - ; the november 1-30 2009 of approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program is $ 122300000.00 ;

period the december 1-31 2009 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 334 ; the december 1-31 2009 of average price paid per share is $ 32.03 ; the december 1-31 2009 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program is - ; the december 1-31 2009 of approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program is $ 122300000.00 ;

Answer: 613009.2

Question: what is the total amount spent for the purchased shares during december 2005?

Answer: 187050

celanese purchases of its equity securities period number of shares ( or units ) purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share ( or unit ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs october 1 2013 october 31 , 2005 2014 2014 2014 2014 november 1 2013 november 30 , 2005 2014 2014 2014 2014 december 1 2013 december 31 , 2005 10000 $ 18.705 10000 2014 .

period the december1 2013 december 31 2005 of totalnumber ofshares ( or units ) purchased ( 1 ) is 10000 ; the december1 2013 december 31 2005 of averageprice paidper share ( orunit ) is $ 18.705 ; the december1 2013 december 31 2005 of total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased aspart ofpublicly announcedplans or programs is 10000 ; the december1 2013 december 31 2005 of maximumnumber ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) thatmayyet be purchased under theplans orprograms is 2014 ;

period the total of totalnumber ofshares ( or units ) purchased ( 1 ) is 10000 ; the total of averageprice paidper share ( orunit ) is $ 18.705 ; the total of total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased aspart ofpublicly announcedplans or programs is 10000 ; the total of maximumnumber ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) thatmayyet be purchased under theplans orprograms is 2014 ;

Answer: 187050


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage of additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade over additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade for 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 63%.

Rejected response: 68%.

GS || what is the percentage of additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade over additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage of additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade over additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade for 2012?

Answer: 63%

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is $ 1534 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is $ 1303 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 2183 ;

in millions 2012 2011 additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade $ 1534 $ 1303 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2500 2183 cash flows as a global financial institution , our cash flows are complex and bear little relation to our net earnings and net assets .

the table below presents the additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in our credit ratings. .

Answer: 63%

Question: what is the percentage of additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade over additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade for 2011?

Answer: 68%

Answer: 68%