Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11.9%.

Rejected response: -9.5%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2018?

Answer: 11.9%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2018 is $ 36616 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32730 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30790 ;

2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues .

Answer: 11.9%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2016?

Answer: -9.5%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents our net revenues by line item in the consolidated statements of earnings. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32073 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30608 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is $ 33820 ;

2017 versus 2016 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 32.07 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , due to significantly higher other principal transactions revenues , and higher investment banking revenues , investment management revenues and net interest income .

Answer: -9.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11.9%.

Rejected response: 4.8%.

GS || what is the growth rate in net revenues <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2018?

Answer: 11.9%

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2018 is $ 36616 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32730 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30790 ;

2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues .

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. .

Answer: 11.9%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 4.8%

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32073 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30608 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is $ 33820 ;

2017 versus 2016 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 32.07 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , due to significantly higher other principal transactions revenues , and higher investment banking revenues , investment management revenues and net interest income .

2030 market making consists of revenues ( excluding net interest ) from client execution activities related to making markets in interest rate products , credit products , mortgages , currencies , commodities and equity products .

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents our net revenues by line item in the consolidated statements of earnings. .

Answer: 4.8%

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11.9%.

Rejected response: 6.3%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2018?

Answer: 11.9%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2018 is $ 36616 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32730 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30790 ;

2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues .

Answer: 11.9%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 6.3%

Answer: 6.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.8%.

Rejected response: -20.7%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 4.8%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents our net revenues by line item in the consolidated statements of earnings. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32073 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30608 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is $ 33820 ;

2017 versus 2016 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 32.07 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , due to significantly higher other principal transactions revenues , and higher investment banking revenues , investment management revenues and net interest income .

Answer: 4.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2011?

Answer: -20.7%

in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2012 is 18124 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2011 is 17280 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2010 is 21796 ;

in addition , net revenues in credit products and interest rate products were solid and higher compared with 2011 .

these increases were partially offset by significantly lower net revenues in commodities and slightly lower net revenues in currencies .

includes net revenues related to reinsurance of $ 1.08 billion , $ 880 million and $ 827 million for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively .

net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 .

Answer: -20.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.8%.

Rejected response: -9.5%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 4.8%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents our net revenues by line item in the consolidated statements of earnings. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32073 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30608 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is $ 33820 ;

2017 versus 2016 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 32.07 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , due to significantly higher other principal transactions revenues , and higher investment banking revenues , investment management revenues and net interest income .

Answer: 4.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2016?

Answer: -9.5%

Answer: -9.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.8%.

Rejected response: 11.9%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 4.8%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents our net revenues by line item in the consolidated statements of earnings. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32073 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30608 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is $ 33820 ;

2017 versus 2016 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 32.07 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , due to significantly higher other principal transactions revenues , and higher investment banking revenues , investment management revenues and net interest income .

Answer: 4.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2018?

Answer: 11.9%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2018 is $ 36616 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32730 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30790 ;

2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues .

Answer: 11.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.8%.

Rejected response: 6.3%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 4.8%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents our net revenues by line item in the consolidated statements of earnings. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32073 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30608 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is $ 33820 ;

2017 versus 2016 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 32.07 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , due to significantly higher other principal transactions revenues , and higher investment banking revenues , investment management revenues and net interest income .

Answer: 4.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 6.3%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2018 is $ 36616 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32730 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30790 ;

2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues .

Answer: 6.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6.3%.

Rejected response: -20.7%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 6.3%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2018 is $ 36616 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32730 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30790 ;

2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues .

Answer: 6.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2011?

Answer: -20.7%

in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2012 is 18124 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2011 is 17280 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2010 is 21796 ;

includes net revenues related to reinsurance of $ 1.08 billion , $ 880 million and $ 827 million for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively .

net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 .

Answer: -20.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6.3%.

Rejected response: -9.5%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 6.3%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2018 is $ 36616 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32730 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30790 ;

2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues .

Answer: 6.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2016?

Answer: -9.5%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents our net revenues by line item in the consolidated statements of earnings. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32073 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30608 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is $ 33820 ;

2017 versus 2016 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 32.07 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , due to significantly higher other principal transactions revenues , and higher investment banking revenues , investment management revenues and net interest income .

Answer: -9.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6.3%.

Rejected response: 11.9%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 6.3%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2018 is $ 36616 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32730 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30790 ;

2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues .

Answer: 6.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2018?

Answer: 11.9%

Answer: 11.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6.3%.

Rejected response: 4.8%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 6.3%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2018 is $ 36616 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32730 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30790 ;

2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues .

Answer: 6.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 4.8%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents our net revenues by line item in the consolidated statements of earnings. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32073 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30608 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is $ 33820 ;

2017 versus 2016 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 32.07 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , due to significantly higher other principal transactions revenues , and higher investment banking revenues , investment management revenues and net interest income .

Answer: 4.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts during 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2.

Rejected response: -7.

ECL || what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts during 2015?

Answer: -2

( millions ) the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 75 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 77 ; the beginning balance of 2014 is $ 81 ;

( millions ) the ending balance of 2016 is $ 68 ; the ending balance of 2015 is $ 75 ; the ending balance of 2014 is $ 77 ;

accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable are carried at the invoiced amounts , less an allowance for doubtful accounts , and generally do not bear interest .

( millions ) the bad debt expense of 2016 is 20 ; the bad debt expense of 2015 is 26 ; the bad debt expense of 2014 is 23 ;

Answer: -2

Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts during 2016?

Answer: -7

Answer: -7


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts during 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2.

Rejected response: 3.9.

Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts during 2015?

Answer: -2

( millions ) the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 75 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 77 ; the beginning balance of 2014 is $ 81 ;

( millions ) the bad debt expense of 2016 is 20 ; the bad debt expense of 2015 is 26 ; the bad debt expense of 2014 is 23 ;

( millions ) the ending balance of 2016 is $ 68 ; the ending balance of 2015 is $ 75 ; the ending balance of 2014 is $ 77 ;

Answer: -2

Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 3.9

( millions ) the ending balance of 2017 is $ 71.5 ; the ending balance of 2016 is $ 67.6 ; the ending balance of 2015 is $ 75.3 ;

the company estimates the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates .

( millions ) the beginning balance of 2017 is $ 67.6 ; the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 75.3 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 77.5 ;

( millions ) the bad debt expense of 2017 is 17.1 ; the bad debt expense of 2016 is 20.1 ; the bad debt expense of 2015 is 25.8 ;

Answer: 3.9


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts during 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -7.

Rejected response: -2.

Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts during 2016?

Answer: -7

( millions ) the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 75 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 77 ; the beginning balance of 2014 is $ 81 ;

( millions ) the bad debt expense of 2016 is 20 ; the bad debt expense of 2015 is 26 ; the bad debt expense of 2014 is 23 ;

( millions ) the ending balance of 2016 is $ 68 ; the ending balance of 2015 is $ 75 ; the ending balance of 2014 is $ 77 ;

Answer: -7

Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts during 2015?

Answer: -2

Answer: -2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts during 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -7.

Rejected response: 3.9.

Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts during 2016?

Answer: -7

( millions ) the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 75 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 77 ; the beginning balance of 2014 is $ 81 ;

( millions ) the bad debt expense of 2016 is 20 ; the bad debt expense of 2015 is 26 ; the bad debt expense of 2014 is 23 ;

( millions ) the ending balance of 2016 is $ 68 ; the ending balance of 2015 is $ 75 ; the ending balance of 2014 is $ 77 ;

Answer: -7

Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 3.9

( millions ) the beginning balance of 2017 is $ 67.6 ; the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 75.3 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 77.5 ;

( millions ) the bad debt expense of 2017 is 17.1 ; the bad debt expense of 2016 is 20.1 ; the bad debt expense of 2015 is 25.8 ;

( millions ) the ending balance of 2017 is $ 71.5 ; the ending balance of 2016 is $ 67.6 ; the ending balance of 2015 is $ 75.3 ;

Answer: 3.9


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.9.

Rejected response: -2.

Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 3.9

( millions ) the beginning balance of 2017 is $ 67.6 ; the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 75.3 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 77.5 ;

( millions ) the bad debt expense of 2017 is 17.1 ; the bad debt expense of 2016 is 20.1 ; the bad debt expense of 2015 is 25.8 ;

( millions ) the ending balance of 2017 is $ 71.5 ; the ending balance of 2016 is $ 67.6 ; the ending balance of 2015 is $ 75.3 ;

Answer: 3.9

Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts during 2015?

Answer: -2

( millions ) the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 75 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 77 ; the beginning balance of 2014 is $ 81 ;

( millions ) the bad debt expense of 2016 is 20 ; the bad debt expense of 2015 is 26 ; the bad debt expense of 2014 is 23 ;

( millions ) the ending balance of 2016 is $ 68 ; the ending balance of 2015 is $ 75 ; the ending balance of 2014 is $ 77 ;

Answer: -2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.9.

Rejected response: -7.

Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 3.9

( millions ) the beginning balance of 2017 is $ 67.6 ; the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 75.3 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 77.5 ;

( millions ) the bad debt expense of 2017 is 17.1 ; the bad debt expense of 2016 is 20.1 ; the bad debt expense of 2015 is 25.8 ;

( millions ) the ending balance of 2017 is $ 71.5 ; the ending balance of 2016 is $ 67.6 ; the ending balance of 2015 is $ 75.3 ;

Answer: 3.9

Question: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts during 2016?

Answer: -7

( millions ) the beginning balance of 2016 is $ 75 ; the beginning balance of 2015 is $ 77 ; the beginning balance of 2014 is $ 81 ;

( millions ) the bad debt expense of 2016 is 20 ; the bad debt expense of 2015 is 26 ; the bad debt expense of 2014 is 23 ;

( millions ) the ending balance of 2016 is $ 68 ; the ending balance of 2015 is $ 75 ; the ending balance of 2014 is $ 77 ;

Answer: -7


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of total consumer packaging sales in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 63%.

Rejected response: 67%.

IP || what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of total consumer packaging sales <TIME>?

Question: what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of total consumer packaging sales in 2012?

Answer: 63%

multiply(const_2, const_1000), divide(#0, 3170)

in millions the sales of 2012 is $ 3170 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 3710 ; the sales of 2010 is $ 3400 ;

north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2011 and $ 2.4 billion in 2010 .

net sales were $ 185 million in 2012 and $ 35 million in 2011 .

Answer: 63%

Question: what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of total consumer packaging sales in 2011?

Answer: 67%

Answer: 67%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of total consumer packaging sales in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 67%.

Rejected response: 63%.

Question: what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of total consumer packaging sales in 2011?

Answer: 67%

net sales were $ 185 million in 2012 and $ 35 million in 2011 .

in millions the sales of 2012 is $ 3170 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 3710 ; the sales of 2010 is $ 3400 ;

north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2011 and $ 2.4 billion in 2010 .

Answer: 67%

Question: what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of total consumer packaging sales in 2012?

Answer: 63%

multiply(const_2, const_1000), divide(#0, 3170)

Answer: 63%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change of unrecognized tax benefits at year end between 2016 and 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1%.

Rejected response: 33%.

AES || what was the percentage change of unrecognized tax benefits at year end <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change of unrecognized tax benefits at year end between 2016 and 2017?

Answer: -1%

the balance at december 31 of 2018 is $ 463 ; the balance at december 31 of 2017 is $ 348 ; the balance at december 31 of 2016 is $ 352 ;

The additions for current year tax positions of 2018 is 2 ; The additions for current year tax positions of 2017 is 2014 ; The additions for current year tax positions of 2016 is 2 ;

however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty .

the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

the balance at january 1 of 2018 is $ 348 ; the balance at january 1 of 2017 is $ 352 ; the balance at january 1 of 2016 is $ 364 ;

Answer: -1%

Question: what was the percentage change of unrecognized tax benefits at year end between 2017 and 2018?

Answer: 33%

Answer: 33%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change of unrecognized tax benefits at year end between 2017 and 2018?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 33%.

Rejected response: -1%.

Question: what was the percentage change of unrecognized tax benefits at year end between 2017 and 2018?

Answer: 33%

the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

the balance at january 1 of 2018 is $ 348 ; the balance at january 1 of 2017 is $ 352 ; the balance at january 1 of 2016 is $ 364 ;

the balance at december 31 of 2018 is $ 463 ; the balance at december 31 of 2017 is $ 348 ; the balance at december 31 of 2016 is $ 352 ;

Answer: 33%

Question: what was the percentage change of unrecognized tax benefits at year end between 2016 and 2017?

Answer: -1%

Answer: -1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2010 what was the ratio of the securities borrowed to the securities loaned
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11.67.

Rejected response: 5.05.

JPM || <TIME> what was the ratio of the securities borrowed to the securities loaned

Question: in 2010 what was the ratio of the securities borrowed to the securities loaned

Answer: 11.67

december 31 ( in millions ) the securities borrowed ( b ) of 2010 is 123587 ; the securities borrowed ( b ) of 2009 is 119630 ;

december 31 ( in millions ) the securities loaned of 2010 is 10592 ; the securities loaned of 2009 is 7835 ;

securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are generally carried at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received .

( b ) includes securities borrowed of $ 14.0 billion and $ 7.0 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .

Answer: 11.67

Question: in 2012 what was the ratio of the securities borrowed to the securities loaned

Answer: 5.05

december 31 ( in millions ) the securities borrowed ( b ) of 2012 is 119017 ; the securities borrowed ( b ) of 2011 is 142462 ;

december 31 ( in millions ) the securities loaned ( d ) of 2012 is 23582 ; the securities loaned ( d ) of 2011 is 14214 ;

the securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements ; securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements ; and securities borrowed on the consolidated balance sheets .

( d ) at december 31 , 2012 , included securities loaned of $ 457 million accounted for at fair value .

Answer: 5.05


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2012 what was the ratio of the securities borrowed to the securities loaned
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5.05.

Rejected response: 11.67.

Question: in 2012 what was the ratio of the securities borrowed to the securities loaned

Answer: 5.05

( d ) at december 31 , 2012 , included securities loaned of $ 457 million accounted for at fair value .

december 31 ( in millions ) the securities borrowed ( b ) of 2012 is 119017 ; the securities borrowed ( b ) of 2011 is 142462 ;

december 31 ( in millions ) the securities loaned ( d ) of 2012 is 23582 ; the securities loaned ( d ) of 2011 is 14214 ;

Answer: 5.05

Question: in 2010 what was the ratio of the securities borrowed to the securities loaned

Answer: 11.67

december 31 ( in millions ) the securities borrowed ( b ) of 2010 is 123587 ; the securities borrowed ( b ) of 2009 is 119630 ;

december 31 ( in millions ) the securities loaned of 2010 is 10592 ; the securities loaned of 2009 is 7835 ;

( b ) includes securities borrowed of $ 14.0 billion and $ 7.0 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .

Answer: 11.67


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage increase in inventories balance due to the adoption of lifo in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5.4%.

Rejected response: 5.8%.

AAP || what is the percentage increase in inventories balance due to the adoption of lifo <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage increase in inventories balance due to the adoption of lifo in 2013?

Answer: 5.4%

the inventories at fifo net of december 282013 is $ 2424795 ; the inventories at fifo net of december 292012 is $ 2182419 ;

the adjustments to state inventories at lifo of december 282013 is 131762 ; the adjustments to state inventories at lifo of december 292012 is 126190 ;

under lifo , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most recently purchased inventories , while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs for inventories purchased in fiscal 2013 and prior years .

the inventories at lifo net of december 282013 is $ 2556557 ; the inventories at lifo net of december 292012 is $ 2308609 ;

Answer: 5.4%

Question: what is the percentage increase in inventories balance due to the adoption of lifo in 2012?

Answer: 5.8%

in fiscal 2011 , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories .

Answer: 5.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage increase in inventories balance due to the adoption of lifo in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5.8%.

Rejected response: 5.4%.

Question: what is the percentage increase in inventories balance due to the adoption of lifo in 2012?

Answer: 5.8%

the inventories at fifo net of december 282013 is $ 2424795 ; the inventories at fifo net of december 292012 is $ 2182419 ;

the adjustments to state inventories at lifo of december 282013 is 131762 ; the adjustments to state inventories at lifo of december 292012 is 126190 ;

the inventories at lifo net of december 282013 is $ 2556557 ; the inventories at lifo net of december 292012 is $ 2308609 ;

Answer: 5.8%

Question: what is the percentage increase in inventories balance due to the adoption of lifo in 2013?

Answer: 5.4%

Answer: 5.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the roi of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 15.3%.

Rejected response: 24%.

TFX || what is the roi of an investment in teleflex incorporated <TIME>?

Question: what is the roi of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 15.3%

company / index the teleflex incorporated of 2013 is 100 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2014 is 124 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2015 is 143 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2016 is 177 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2017 is 275 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2018 is 288 ;

company / index The s&p 500 index of 2013 is 100 ; The s&p 500 index of 2014 is 114 ; The s&p 500 index of 2015 is 115 ; The s&p 500 index of 2016 is 129 ; The s&p 500 index of 2017 is 157 ; The s&p 500 index of 2018 is 150 ;

the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2013 and that all dividends were reinvested .

company / index the s&p 500 index of 2013 is 100 ; the s&p 500 index of 2014 is 114 ; the s&p 500 index of 2015 is 115 ; the s&p 500 index of 2016 is 129 ; the s&p 500 index of 2017 is 157 ; the s&p 500 index of 2018 is 150 ;

company / index the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2013 is 100 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2014 is 126 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2015 is 134 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2016 is 142 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2017 is 186 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2018 is 213 ;

Answer: 15.3%

Question: what is the roi of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 24%

Answer: 24%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the roi of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 24%.

Rejected response: 15.3%.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 24%

company / index the teleflex incorporated of 2013 is 100 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2014 is 124 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2015 is 143 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2016 is 177 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2017 is 275 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2018 is 288 ;

company / index the s&p 500 index of 2013 is 100 ; the s&p 500 index of 2014 is 114 ; the s&p 500 index of 2015 is 115 ; the s&p 500 index of 2016 is 129 ; the s&p 500 index of 2017 is 157 ; the s&p 500 index of 2018 is 150 ;

company / index the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2013 is 100 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2014 is 126 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2015 is 134 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2016 is 142 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2017 is 186 ; the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index of 2018 is 213 ;

Answer: 24%

Question: what is the roi of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 15.3%

Answer: 15.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total loans receivable gross in 2015 were loans backed by commercial real estate?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12%.

Rejected response: 9%.

GS || what percentage of total loans receivable gross <TIME> were loans backed by commercial real estate?

Question: what percentage of total loans receivable gross in 2015 were loans backed by commercial real estate?

Answer: 12%

$ in millions the loans backed by commercial real estate of as of december 2016 is 4761 ; the loans backed by commercial real estate of as of december 2015 is 5271 ;

$ in millions the total loans receivable gross of as of december 2016 is 50181 ; the total loans receivable gross of as of december 2015 is 45821 ;

$ in millions The loans backed by residential real estate of as of december 2016 is 3865 ; The loans backed by residential real estate of as of december 2015 is 2316 ;

$ in millions the total loans receivable of as of december 2016 is $ 49672 ; the total loans receivable of as of december 2015 is $ 45407 ;

Answer: 12%

Question: what percentage of total loans receivable gross in 2016 were loans backed by commercial real estate?

Answer: 9%

Answer: 9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total loans receivable gross in 2016 were loans backed by commercial real estate?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9%.

Rejected response: 12%.

Question: what percentage of total loans receivable gross in 2016 were loans backed by commercial real estate?

Answer: 9%

$ in millions the loans backed by commercial real estate of as of december 2016 is 4761 ; the loans backed by commercial real estate of as of december 2015 is 5271 ;

$ in millions the total loans receivable gross of as of december 2016 is 50181 ; the total loans receivable gross of as of december 2015 is 45821 ;

$ in millions the total loans receivable of as of december 2016 is $ 49672 ; the total loans receivable of as of december 2015 is $ 45407 ;

Answer: 9%

Question: what percentage of total loans receivable gross in 2015 were loans backed by commercial real estate?

Answer: 12%

Answer: 12%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the net change in thousands of the goodwill and intangible assets balance from october 31 , 2010 to october 31 , 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-10-31 00:00:00 to 2011-11-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 23443.

Rejected response: 687701.

SNPS || what was the net change in thousands of the goodwill and intangible assets balance <TIME>?

Question: what was the net change in thousands of the goodwill and intangible assets balance from october 31 , 2010 to october 31 , 2011?

Answer: 23443

the balance at october 31 2010 of ( in thousands ) is $ 1265843 ;

the balance at october 31 2011 of ( in thousands ) is $ 1289286 ;

The balance at october 31 2012 of ( in thousands ) is $ 1976987 ;

the balance at october 31 2012 of ( in thousands ) is $ 1976987 ;

Answer: 23443

Question: what was the net change in thousands of the goodwill and intangible assets balance from october 31 , 2011 to october 31 , 2012?

Answer: 687701

The balance at october 31 2010 of ( in thousands ) is $ 1265843 ;

Answer: 687701


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the net change in thousands of the goodwill and intangible assets balance from october 31 , 2011 to october 31 , 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-10-31 00:00:00 to 2012-11-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 687701.

Rejected response: 23443.

Question: what was the net change in thousands of the goodwill and intangible assets balance from october 31 , 2011 to october 31 , 2012?

Answer: 687701

the balance at october 31 2010 of ( in thousands ) is $ 1265843 ;

the balance at october 31 2011 of ( in thousands ) is $ 1289286 ;

the balance at october 31 2012 of ( in thousands ) is $ 1976987 ;

Answer: 687701

Question: what was the net change in thousands of the goodwill and intangible assets balance from october 31 , 2010 to october 31 , 2011?

Answer: 23443

Answer: 23443


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of consumer packaging sales where from north american consumer packaging in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 59%.

Rejected response: 65%.

IP || what percentage of consumer packaging sales where from north american consumer packaging <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of consumer packaging sales where from north american consumer packaging in 2014?

Answer: 59%

multiply(const_2, const_1000), divide(#0, 3403)

in millions the sales of 2015 is $ 2940 ; the sales of 2014 is $ 3403 ; the sales of 2013 is $ 3435 ;

north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2014 and $ 2.0 billion in 2013 .

in millions the operating profit ( loss ) of 2015 is -25 ( 25 ) ; the operating profit ( loss ) of 2014 is 178 ; the operating profit ( loss ) of 2013 is 161 ;

Answer: 59%

Question: what percentage of consumer packaging sales where from north american consumer packaging in 2015?

Answer: 65%

Answer: 65%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of consumer packaging sales where from north american consumer packaging in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 65%.

Rejected response: 59%.

Question: what percentage of consumer packaging sales where from north american consumer packaging in 2015?

Answer: 65%

in millions the sales of 2015 is $ 2940 ; the sales of 2014 is $ 3403 ; the sales of 2013 is $ 3435 ;

in millions the operating profit ( loss ) of 2015 is -25 ( 25 ) ; the operating profit ( loss ) of 2014 is 178 ; the operating profit ( loss ) of 2013 is 161 ;

north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2014 and $ 2.0 billion in 2013 .

Answer: 65%

Question: what percentage of consumer packaging sales where from north american consumer packaging in 2014?

Answer: 59%

multiply(const_2, const_1000), divide(#0, 3403)

Answer: 59%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-09-18 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -21.47.

Rejected response: 227.11%.

DISCA || what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb common stock <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2008?

Answer: -21.47

subtract(78.53, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the discb of september 18 2008 is $ 100.00 ; the discb of september 30 2008 is $ 105.54 ; the discb of december 31 2008 is $ 78.53 ;

september 18 , september 30 , december 31 , 2008 2008 2008 .

2 0 0 8 a n n u a l r e p o r t stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the performance of our series a common , series b common stock , and series c common stock for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 as compared with the performance of the standard and poor 2019s 500 index and a peer group index which consists of the walt disney company , time warner inc. , cbs corporation class b common stock , viacom , inc .

the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2006 and that all subsequent dividends were reinvested in additional shares .

the s&p 500 of september 18 2008 is $ 100.00 ; the s&p 500 of september 30 2008 is $ 96.54 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2008 is $ 74.86 ;

Answer: -21.47

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2012?

Answer: 227.11%

subtract(327.11, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the discb of december 312008 is $ 78.53 ; the discb of december 312009 is $ 162.82 ; the discb of december 312010 is $ 225.95 ; the discb of december 312011 is $ 217.56 ; the discb of december 312012 is $ 327.11 ;

the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 .

stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc .

the disck of december 312008 is $ 83.69 ; the disck of december 312009 is $ 165.75 ; the disck of december 312010 is $ 229.31 ; the disck of december 312011 is $ 235.63 ; the disck of december 312012 is $ 365.63 ;

Answer: 227.11%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2012?
Reference time interval: 2008-09-18 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 227.11%.

Rejected response: -21.47.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2012?

Answer: 227.11%

subtract(327.11, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 .

the discb of december 312008 is $ 78.53 ; the discb of december 312009 is $ 162.82 ; the discb of december 312010 is $ 225.95 ; the discb of december 312011 is $ 217.56 ; the discb of december 312012 is $ 327.11 ;

the disck of december 312008 is $ 83.69 ; the disck of december 312009 is $ 165.75 ; the disck of december 312010 is $ 229.31 ; the disck of december 312011 is $ 235.63 ; the disck of december 312012 is $ 365.63 ;

Answer: 227.11%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2008?

Answer: -21.47

subtract(78.53, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2006 and that all subsequent dividends were reinvested in additional shares .

the discb of september 18 2008 is $ 100.00 ; the discb of september 30 2008 is $ 105.54 ; the discb of december 31 2008 is $ 78.53 ;

the s&p 500 of september 18 2008 is $ 100.00 ; the s&p 500 of september 30 2008 is $ 96.54 ; the s&p 500 of december 31 2008 is $ 74.86 ;

Answer: -21.47


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in cash payments related to exit costs at pmi from 2014 to 2015 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -128.

Rejected response: 339.

PM || what was the difference in cash payments related to exit costs at pmi <TIME> in millions?

Question: what was the difference in cash payments related to exit costs at pmi from 2014 to 2015 in millions?

Answer: -128

cash payments related to exit costs at pmi were $ 232 million , $ 360 million and $ 21 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .

future cash payments for exit costs incurred to date are expected to be approximately $ 54 million , and will be substantially paid by the end of 2017 .

movement in exit cost liabilities the movement in exit cost liabilities for pmi was as follows : ( in millions ) .

liability balance january 1 2014 the cash spent of $ 308 is -232 ( 232 ) ;

contract termination charges during 2013 , pmi recorded exit costs of $ 258 million related to the termination of distribution agreements in eastern europe , middle east & africa ( due to a new business model in egypt ) and asia .

Answer: -128

Question: what was the difference in cash payments related to exit costs at pmi from 2013 to 2014 in millions?

Answer: 339

Answer: 339


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in cash payments related to exit costs at pmi from 2013 to 2014 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 339.

Rejected response: -128.

Question: what was the difference in cash payments related to exit costs at pmi from 2013 to 2014 in millions?

Answer: 339

liability balance january 1 2014 the cash spent of $ 308 is -232 ( 232 ) ;

cash payments related to exit costs at pmi were $ 232 million , $ 360 million and $ 21 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .

contract termination charges during 2013 , pmi recorded exit costs of $ 258 million related to the termination of distribution agreements in eastern europe , middle east & africa ( due to a new business model in egypt ) and asia .

Answer: 339

Question: what was the difference in cash payments related to exit costs at pmi from 2014 to 2015 in millions?

Answer: -128

Answer: -128


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: 14%.

GS || what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2015?

Answer: 13%

in millions the 2015 of as of december 2013 is 340 ;

in millions the total of as of december 2013 is $ 2695 ;

the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals .

in millions the 2014 of as of december 2013 is $ 387 ;

Answer: 13%

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2019?

Answer: 14%

$ in millions the 2019 of as of december 2017 is 282 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2017 is $ 1964 ;

$ in millions the 2022 of as of december 2017 is 145 ;

Answer: 14%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: 15%.

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2015?

Answer: 13%

in millions the 2014 of as of december 2013 is $ 387 ;

in millions the 2015 of as of december 2013 is 340 ;

in millions the total of as of december 2013 is $ 2695 ;

Answer: 13%

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2018?

Answer: 15%

$ in millions the 2018 of as of december 2016 is 282 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2016 is $ 1941 ;

$ in millions the 2017 of as of december 2016 is $ 290 ;

Answer: 15%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2019?
Reference time interval: 2019-01-01 00:00:00 to 2020-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 14%.

Rejected response: 13%.

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2019?

Answer: 14%

$ in millions the 2019 of as of december 2017 is 282 ;

$ in millions the 2022 of as of december 2017 is 145 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2017 is $ 1964 ;

Answer: 14%

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2015?

Answer: 13%

in millions the 2014 of as of december 2013 is $ 387 ;

in millions the 2015 of as of december 2013 is 340 ;

in millions the total of as of december 2013 is $ 2695 ;

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2019?
Reference time interval: 2019-01-01 00:00:00 to 2020-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 14%.

Rejected response: 15%.

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2019?

Answer: 14%

$ in millions the 2019 of as of december 2017 is 282 ;

$ in millions the 2022 of as of december 2017 is 145 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2017 is $ 1964 ;

Answer: 14%

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2018?

Answer: 15%

$ in millions the 2017 of as of december 2016 is $ 290 ;

$ in millions the 2018 of as of december 2016 is 282 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2016 is $ 1941 ;

Answer: 15%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 15%.

Rejected response: 13%.

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2018?

Answer: 15%

$ in millions the 2017 of as of december 2016 is $ 290 ;

$ in millions the 2018 of as of december 2016 is 282 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2016 is $ 1941 ;

Answer: 15%

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2015?

Answer: 13%

in millions the 2014 of as of december 2013 is $ 387 ;

in millions the 2015 of as of december 2013 is 340 ;

in millions the total of as of december 2013 is $ 2695 ;

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 15%.

Rejected response: 14%.

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2018?

Answer: 15%

$ in millions the 2017 of as of december 2016 is $ 290 ;

$ in millions the 2018 of as of december 2016 is 282 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2016 is $ 1941 ;

Answer: 15%

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2019?

Answer: 14%

$ in millions the 2019 of as of december 2017 is 282 ;

$ in millions the 2022 of as of december 2017 is 145 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2017 is $ 1964 ;

Answer: 14%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2012 what percentage of total subsidiary trusts obligations are due to bank subsidiary?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 41%.

Rejected response: 49%.

C || <TIME> what percentage of total subsidiary trusts obligations are due to bank subsidiary?

Question: in 2012 what percentage of total subsidiary trusts obligations are due to bank subsidiary?

Answer: 41%

in millions of dollars the bank of 2011 is $ 35066 ; the bank of 2012 is $ 38280 ; the bank of 2013 is $ 8013 ; the bank of 2014 is $ 7620 ; the bank of 2015 is $ 6380 ; the bank of thereafter is $ 17875 ;

in millions of dollars the total of 2011 is $ 71473 ; the total of 2012 is $ 94234 ; the total of 2013 is $ 37219 ; the total of 2014 is $ 31903 ; the total of 2015 is $ 21927 ; the total of thereafter is $ 124427 ;

these subsidiary trusts have no assets , operations , revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance , administration , and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts 2019 common securities .

in millions of dollars the non-bank of 2011 is 15213 ; the non-bank of 2012 is 25950 ; the non-bank of 2013 is 7858 ; the non-bank of 2014 is 5187 ; the non-bank of 2015 is 3416 ; the non-bank of thereafter is 18381 ;

Answer: 41%

Question: in 2011 what percentage of total subsidiary trusts obligations are due to bank subsidiary?

Answer: 49%

Answer: 49%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2011 what percentage of total subsidiary trusts obligations are due to bank subsidiary?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 49%.

Rejected response: 41%.

Question: in 2011 what percentage of total subsidiary trusts obligations are due to bank subsidiary?

Answer: 49%

in millions of dollars the bank of 2011 is $ 35066 ; the bank of 2012 is $ 38280 ; the bank of 2013 is $ 8013 ; the bank of 2014 is $ 7620 ; the bank of 2015 is $ 6380 ; the bank of thereafter is $ 17875 ;

in millions of dollars the non-bank of 2011 is 15213 ; the non-bank of 2012 is 25950 ; the non-bank of 2013 is 7858 ; the non-bank of 2014 is 5187 ; the non-bank of 2015 is 3416 ; the non-bank of thereafter is 18381 ;

in millions of dollars the total of 2011 is $ 71473 ; the total of 2012 is $ 94234 ; the total of 2013 is $ 37219 ; the total of 2014 is $ 31903 ; the total of 2015 is $ 21927 ; the total of thereafter is $ 124427 ;

Answer: 49%

Question: in 2012 what percentage of total subsidiary trusts obligations are due to bank subsidiary?

Answer: 41%

Answer: 41%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2014 due in 2016 are purchase obligations?
Reference time interval: 2014-12-31 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12%.

Rejected response: 79%.

IP || what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations <TIME> due <TIME> are purchase obligations?

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2014 due in 2016 are purchase obligations?

Answer: 12%

in millions the purchase obligations ( c ) of 2015 is 3266 ; the purchase obligations ( c ) of 2016 is 761 ; the purchase obligations ( c ) of 2017 is 583 ; the purchase obligations ( c ) of 2018 is 463 ; the purchase obligations ( c ) of 2019 is 422 ; the purchase obligations ( c ) of thereafter is 1690 ;

in millions the total ( d ) of 2015 is $ 4150 ; the total ( d ) of 2016 is $ 6612 ; the total ( d ) of 2017 is $ 738 ; the total ( d ) of 2018 is $ 1755 ; the total ( d ) of 2019 is $ 1072 ; the total ( d ) of thereafter is $ 7965 ;

contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2014 , were as follows: .

in millions the lease obligations of 2015 is 142 ; the lease obligations of 2016 is 106 ; the lease obligations of 2017 is 84 ; the lease obligations of 2018 is 63 ; the lease obligations of 2019 is 45 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is 91 ;

Answer: 12%

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2014 due in 2015 are purchase obligations?

Answer: 79%

Answer: 79%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2014 due in 2015 are purchase obligations?
Reference time interval: 2014-12-31 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 79%.

Rejected response: 12%.

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2014 due in 2015 are purchase obligations?

Answer: 79%

in millions the lease obligations of 2015 is 142 ; the lease obligations of 2016 is 106 ; the lease obligations of 2017 is 84 ; the lease obligations of 2018 is 63 ; the lease obligations of 2019 is 45 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is 91 ;

in millions the purchase obligations ( c ) of 2015 is 3266 ; the purchase obligations ( c ) of 2016 is 761 ; the purchase obligations ( c ) of 2017 is 583 ; the purchase obligations ( c ) of 2018 is 463 ; the purchase obligations ( c ) of 2019 is 422 ; the purchase obligations ( c ) of thereafter is 1690 ;

in millions the total ( d ) of 2015 is $ 4150 ; the total ( d ) of 2016 is $ 6612 ; the total ( d ) of 2017 is $ 738 ; the total ( d ) of 2018 is $ 1755 ; the total ( d ) of 2019 is $ 1072 ; the total ( d ) of thereafter is $ 7965 ;

Answer: 79%

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2014 due in 2016 are purchase obligations?

Answer: 12%

Answer: 12%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the change in weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share between 2005 and 2006 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -4.4.

Rejected response: -7.9.

ZBH || what is the change in weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share <TIME> , in millions?

Question: what is the change in weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share between 2005 and 2006 , in millions?

Answer: -4.4

the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2007 is 237.5 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2006 is 245.4 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2005 is 249.8 ;

The weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2007 is 235.5 ; The weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2006 is 243.0 ; The weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2005 is 247.1 ;

weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share 235.5 243.0 247.1 effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards 2.0 2.4 2.7 weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share 237.5 245.4 249.8 for the year ended december 31 , 2007 , an average of 3.1 million options to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of the common stock .

the following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares for the basic and diluted share computations for the years ending december 31 ( in millions ) : .

Answer: -4.4

Question: what is the change in weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share between 2006 and 2007 , in millions?

Answer: -7.9

Answer: -7.9


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the change in weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share between 2006 and 2007 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -7.9.

Rejected response: -4.4.

Question: what is the change in weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share between 2006 and 2007 , in millions?

Answer: -7.9

the following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares for the basic and diluted share computations for the years ending december 31 ( in millions ) : .

the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2007 is 237.5 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2006 is 245.4 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2005 is 249.8 ;

weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share 235.5 243.0 247.1 effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards 2.0 2.4 2.7 weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share 237.5 245.4 249.8 for the year ended december 31 , 2007 , an average of 3.1 million options to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of the common stock .

Answer: -7.9

Question: what is the change in weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share between 2005 and 2006 , in millions?

Answer: -4.4

Answer: -4.4


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the average beginning and ending balance of shares in millions outstanding during 2009?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1194.5.

Rejected response: 1278.

SLB || what was the average beginning and ending balance of shares in millions outstanding <TIME>?

Question: what was the average beginning and ending balance of shares in millions outstanding during 2009?

Answer: 1194.5

the balance december 31 2008 of issued is 1334 ; the balance december 31 2008 of in treasury is -140 ( 140 ) ; the balance december 31 2008 of shares outstanding is 1194 ;

the balance december 31 2009 of issued is 1334 ; the balance december 31 2009 of in treasury is -139 ( 139 ) ; the balance december 31 2009 of shares outstanding is 1195 ;

schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock issued in treasury shares outstanding ( stated in millions ) .

the balance january 1 2008 of issued is 1334 ; the balance january 1 2008 of in treasury is -138 ( 138 ) ; the balance january 1 2008 of shares outstanding is 1196 ;

Answer: 1194.5

Question: what was the average beginning and ending balance of shares in millions outstanding during 2010?

Answer: 1278

the balance december 31 2010 of issued is 1434 ; the balance december 31 2010 of in treasury is -73 ( 73 ) ; the balance december 31 2010 of shares outstanding is 1361 ;

Answer: 1278


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the average beginning and ending balance of shares in millions outstanding during 2010?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1278.

Rejected response: 1194.5.

Question: what was the average beginning and ending balance of shares in millions outstanding during 2010?

Answer: 1278

the balance december 31 2008 of issued is 1334 ; the balance december 31 2008 of in treasury is -140 ( 140 ) ; the balance december 31 2008 of shares outstanding is 1194 ;

the balance december 31 2009 of issued is 1334 ; the balance december 31 2009 of in treasury is -139 ( 139 ) ; the balance december 31 2009 of shares outstanding is 1195 ;

the balance december 31 2010 of issued is 1434 ; the balance december 31 2010 of in treasury is -73 ( 73 ) ; the balance december 31 2010 of shares outstanding is 1361 ;

Answer: 1278

Question: what was the average beginning and ending balance of shares in millions outstanding during 2009?

Answer: 1194.5

the balance january 1 2008 of issued is 1334 ; the balance january 1 2008 of in treasury is -138 ( 138 ) ; the balance january 1 2008 of shares outstanding is 1196 ;

Answer: 1194.5


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by north american industrial packaging net sales in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 84%.

Rejected response: 87%.

IP || what percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by north american industrial packaging net sales <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by north american industrial packaging net sales in 2013?

Answer: 84%

in millions the sales of 2013 is $ 14810 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 13280 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 10430 ;

north american industrial packaging net sales were $ 12.5 billion in 2013 compared with $ 11.6 billion in 2012 and $ 8.6 billion in 2011 .

in millions the operating profit of 2013 is 1801 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 1066 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 1147 ;

Answer: 84%

Question: what percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012?

Answer: 87%

Answer: 87%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 87%.

Rejected response: 84%.

Question: what percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012?

Answer: 87%

in millions the sales of 2013 is $ 14810 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 13280 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 10430 ;

in millions the operating profit of 2013 is 1801 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 1066 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 1147 ;

north american industrial packaging net sales were $ 12.5 billion in 2013 compared with $ 11.6 billion in 2012 and $ 8.6 billion in 2011 .

Answer: 87%

Question: what percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by north american industrial packaging net sales in 2013?

Answer: 84%

Answer: 84%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage difference in natural gas marketed ( bcf ) between 2011 and 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -16%.

Rejected response: -8%.

OKE || what was the percentage difference in natural gas marketed ( bcf ) <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage difference in natural gas marketed ( bcf ) between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: -16%

operating information the natural gas marketed ( bcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2012 is 709 ; the natural gas marketed ( bcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2011 is 845 ; the natural gas marketed ( bcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2010 is 919 ;

natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity .

our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility .

operating information the natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ -0.07 ( 0.07 ) ; the natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2011 is $ 0.06 ; the natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2010 is $ 0.18 ;

Answer: -16%

Question: what was the percentage difference in natural gas marketed ( bcf ) between 2010 and 2011?

Answer: -8%

operating information The physically settled volumes ( bcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2012 is 1433 ; The physically settled volumes ( bcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2011 is 1724 ; The physically settled volumes ( bcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2010 is 1874 ;

Answer: -8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage difference in natural gas marketed ( bcf ) between 2010 and 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -8%.

Rejected response: -16%.

Question: what was the percentage difference in natural gas marketed ( bcf ) between 2010 and 2011?

Answer: -8%

operating information the natural gas marketed ( bcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2012 is 709 ; the natural gas marketed ( bcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2011 is 845 ; the natural gas marketed ( bcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2010 is 919 ;

operating information the natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ -0.07 ( 0.07 ) ; the natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2011 is $ 0.06 ; the natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf ) of years ended december 31 , 2010 is $ 0.18 ;

Answer: -8%

Question: what was the percentage difference in natural gas marketed ( bcf ) between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: -16%

Answer: -16%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the average spot rate between 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -58%.

Rejected response: -67%.

AES || what was the percentage change in the average spot rate between <TIME> to <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in the average spot rate between 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -58%

year the average spot rate of 2017 is ; the average spot rate of 2016 is 94 ; the average spot rate of 2015 is 287 ; the average spot rate of 2014 is 689 ;

the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / .

year The spot price cap as defined by aneel of 2017 is 534 ; The spot price cap as defined by aneel of 2016 is 423 ; The spot price cap as defined by aneel of 2015 is 388 ; The spot price cap as defined by aneel of 2014 is 822 ;

year the spot price cap as defined by aneel of 2017 is 534 ; the spot price cap as defined by aneel of 2016 is 423 ; the spot price cap as defined by aneel of 2015 is 388 ; the spot price cap as defined by aneel of 2014 is 822 ;

Answer: -58%

Question: what was the percentage change in the average spot rate between 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -67%

as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively .

Answer: -67%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the average spot rate between 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -67%.

Rejected response: -58%.

Question: what was the percentage change in the average spot rate between 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -67%

year the spot price cap as defined by aneel of 2017 is 534 ; the spot price cap as defined by aneel of 2016 is 423 ; the spot price cap as defined by aneel of 2015 is 388 ; the spot price cap as defined by aneel of 2014 is 822 ;

year the average spot rate of 2017 is ; the average spot rate of 2016 is 94 ; the average spot rate of 2015 is 287 ; the average spot rate of 2014 is 689 ;

Answer: -67%

Question: what was the percentage change in the average spot rate between 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -58%

Answer: -58%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rent expenses included in selling , general and administrative expense from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 31%.

Rejected response: 41%.

UAA || what was the percentage change in rent expenses included in selling , general and administrative expense <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in rent expenses included in selling , general and administrative expense from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 31%

included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements .

included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

Answer: 31%

Question: what was the percentage change in rent expenses included in selling , general and administrative expense from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 41%

Answer: 41%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rent expenses included in selling , general and administrative expense from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 41%.

Rejected response: 31%.

Question: what was the percentage change in rent expenses included in selling , general and administrative expense from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 41%

interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements .

included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

Answer: 41%

Question: what was the percentage change in rent expenses included in selling , general and administrative expense from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 31%

Answer: 31%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the unfavorable foreign currency impact in operating expenses in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 212.

Rejected response: 90.

FIS || what is the unfavorable foreign currency impact in operating expenses <TIME>?

Question: what is the unfavorable foreign currency impact in operating expenses in 2015?

Answer: 212

revenues included $ 100 million and $ 243 million and net earnings included $ 10 million , anrr d $ 31 million , respectively , of unfavorable foreign currency impact during 2016 and 2015 resulting from a stronger u.s .

in 2017 , we expect continued unfavorable foreign currency impact on our operating income resulting from the continued strengthening of the u.s .

currency The total impact of 2016 is $ 129 ; The total impact of 2015 is $ 106 ; The total impact of 2014 is $ 107 ;

dollar during these years compared to thet preceding year .

Answer: 212

Question: what is the unfavorable foreign currency impact in operating expenses in 2016?

Answer: 90

Answer: 90


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the unfavorable foreign currency impact in operating expenses in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 90.

Rejected response: 212.

Question: what is the unfavorable foreign currency impact in operating expenses in 2016?

Answer: 90

revenues included $ 100 million and $ 243 million and net earnings included $ 10 million , anrr d $ 31 million , respectively , of unfavorable foreign currency impact during 2016 and 2015 resulting from a stronger u.s .

dollar during these years compared to thet preceding year .

Answer: 90

Question: what is the unfavorable foreign currency impact in operating expenses in 2015?

Answer: 212

Answer: 212


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: north american industrial packaging net sales where what percent of industrial packaging sales in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 82%.

Rejected response: 87%.

IP || north american industrial packaging net sales where what percent of industrial packaging sales <TIME>?

Question: north american industrial packaging net sales where what percent of industrial packaging sales in 2011?

Answer: 82%

in millions the sales of 2012 is $ 13280 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 10430 ; the sales of 2010 is $ 9840 ;

north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 .

in millions the operating profit of 2012 is 1066 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 1147 ; the operating profit of 2010 is 826 ;

Answer: 82%

Question: north american industrial packaging net sales where what percent of industrial packaging sales in 2012?

Answer: 87%

Answer: 87%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: north american industrial packaging net sales where what percent of industrial packaging sales in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 87%.

Rejected response: 82%.

Question: north american industrial packaging net sales where what percent of industrial packaging sales in 2012?

Answer: 87%

in millions the sales of 2012 is $ 13280 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 10430 ; the sales of 2010 is $ 9840 ;

in millions the operating profit of 2012 is 1066 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 1147 ; the operating profit of 2010 is 826 ;

north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 .

Answer: 87%

Question: north american industrial packaging net sales where what percent of industrial packaging sales in 2011?

Answer: 82%

Answer: 82%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what portion of the long-term debt is included in the section of current liabilities on the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.6%.

Rejected response: 7.0%.

HII || what portion of the long-term debt is included in the section of current liabilities on the balance sheet as of december 31 , <TIME>?

Question: what portion of the long-term debt is included in the section of current liabilities on the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2011?

Answer: 1.6%

( $ in millions ) the long-term debt of total is $ 1859 ; the long-term debt of 2012 is $ 29 ; the long-term debt of 2013 - 2014 is $ 129 ; the long-term debt of 2015 - 2016 is $ 396 ; the long-term debt of 2017 and beyond is $ 1305 ;

( $ in millions ) The other long-term liabilities ( 3 ) of total is 587 ; The other long-term liabilities ( 3 ) of 2012 is 66 ; The other long-term liabilities ( 3 ) of 2013 - 2014 is 96 ; The other long-term liabilities ( 3 ) of 2015 - 2016 is 67 ; The other long-term liabilities ( 3 ) of 2017 and beyond is 358 ;

( $ in millions ) The interest payments on long-term debt ( 1 ) of total is 854 ; The interest payments on long-term debt ( 1 ) of 2012 is 112 ; The interest payments on long-term debt ( 1 ) of 2013 - 2014 is 219 ; The interest payments on long-term debt ( 1 ) of 2015 - 2016 is 202 ; The interest payments on long-term debt ( 1 ) of 2017 and beyond is 321 ;

as of december 31 , 2011 , total outstanding long-term debt was $ 1859 million , consisting of these senior notes and the credit facility , in addition to $ 105 million of third party debt that remained outstanding subsequent to the spin-off .

( 3 ) other long-term liabilities primarily consist of total accrued workers 2019 compensation reserves , deferred compensation , and other miscellaneous liabilities , of which $ 201 million is the current portion of workers 2019 compensation liabilities .

Answer: 1.6%

Question: what portion of the long-term debt is included in the section of current liabilities on the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2012?

Answer: 7.0%

the following table presents our contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2011 , and the related estimated timing of future cash payments : ( $ in millions ) total 2012 2013 - 2014 2015 - 2016 2017 and beyond .

Answer: 7.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what portion of the long-term debt is included in the section of current liabilities on the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7.0%.

Rejected response: 1.6%.

Question: what portion of the long-term debt is included in the section of current liabilities on the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2012?

Answer: 7.0%

the following table presents our contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2011 , and the related estimated timing of future cash payments : ( $ in millions ) total 2012 2013 - 2014 2015 - 2016 2017 and beyond .

( $ in millions ) the long-term debt of total is $ 1859 ; the long-term debt of 2012 is $ 29 ; the long-term debt of 2013 - 2014 is $ 129 ; the long-term debt of 2015 - 2016 is $ 396 ; the long-term debt of 2017 and beyond is $ 1305 ;

( 3 ) other long-term liabilities primarily consist of total accrued workers 2019 compensation reserves , deferred compensation , and other miscellaneous liabilities , of which $ 201 million is the current portion of workers 2019 compensation liabilities .

Answer: 7.0%

Question: what portion of the long-term debt is included in the section of current liabilities on the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2011?

Answer: 1.6%

as of december 31 , 2011 , total outstanding long-term debt was $ 1859 million , consisting of these senior notes and the credit facility , in addition to $ 105 million of third party debt that remained outstanding subsequent to the spin-off .

Answer: 1.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for doubtful accounts from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -10%.

Rejected response: 13%.

AAPL || what was the percentage change in the allowance for doubtful accounts <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for doubtful accounts from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -10%

the ending allowance balance of september 29 2007 is $ 47 ; the ending allowance balance of september 30 2006 is $ 52 ; the ending allowance balance of september 24 2005 is $ 46 ;

the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 .

The beginning allowance balance of september 29 2007 is $ 52 ; The beginning allowance balance of september 30 2006 is $ 46 ; The beginning allowance balance of september 24 2005 is $ 47 ;

one customer accounted for approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of trade receivables as of september 29 , 2007 , while no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 .

the beginning allowance balance of september 29 2007 is $ 52 ; the beginning allowance balance of september 30 2006 is $ 46 ; the beginning allowance balance of september 24 2005 is $ 47 ;

Answer: -10%

Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for doubtful accounts from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 13%

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for doubtful accounts from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: -10%.

Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for doubtful accounts from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 13%

the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 .

the beginning allowance balance of september 29 2007 is $ 52 ; the beginning allowance balance of september 30 2006 is $ 46 ; the beginning allowance balance of september 24 2005 is $ 47 ;

the ending allowance balance of september 29 2007 is $ 47 ; the ending allowance balance of september 30 2006 is $ 52 ; the ending allowance balance of september 24 2005 is $ 46 ;

Answer: 13%

Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for doubtful accounts from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -10%

one customer accounted for approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of trade receivables as of september 29 , 2007 , while no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 .

Answer: -10%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -19.0%.

Rejected response: 1.9%.

ECL || what is the percentage change in the balance of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -19.0%

( millions ) the balance at beginning of year of 2017 is $ 75.9 ; the balance at beginning of year of 2016 is $ 74.6 ; the balance at beginning of year of 2015 is $ 78.7 ;

( millions ) the balance at end of year of 2017 is $ 61.5 ; the balance at end of year of 2016 is $ 75.9 ; the balance at end of year of 2015 is $ 74.6 ;

a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: .

the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , if recognized would have affected the effective tax rate by $ 47.1 million as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 57.5 million as of december 31 , 2016 and $ 59.2 million as of december 31 , 2015 .

Answer: -19.0%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 1.9%

Answer: 1.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.9%.

Rejected response: -19.0%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 1.9%

( millions ) the balance at beginning of year of 2017 is $ 75.9 ; the balance at beginning of year of 2016 is $ 74.6 ; the balance at beginning of year of 2015 is $ 78.7 ;

( millions ) the balance at end of year of 2017 is $ 61.5 ; the balance at end of year of 2016 is $ 75.9 ; the balance at end of year of 2015 is $ 74.6 ;

the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , if recognized would have affected the effective tax rate by $ 47.1 million as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 57.5 million as of december 31 , 2016 and $ 59.2 million as of december 31 , 2015 .

Answer: 1.9%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -19.0%

Answer: -19.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in research and development expenses from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -18.3%.

Rejected response: 1.2%.

CE || what is the growth rate in research and development expenses <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in research and development expenses from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -18.3%

research and development expense was $ 86 million , $ 85 million and $ 104 million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively .

research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications .

in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we received cash dividends of $ 115 million , $ 92 million and $ 83 million , respectively .

cellulose derivatives strategic ventures .

although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) .

Answer: -18.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in research and development expenses from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 1.2%

we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives .

Answer: 1.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in research and development expenses from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.2%.

Rejected response: -18.3%.

Question: what is the growth rate in research and development expenses from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 1.2%

cellulose derivatives strategic ventures .

although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) .

research and development expense was $ 86 million , $ 85 million and $ 104 million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively .

Answer: 1.2%

Question: what is the growth rate in research and development expenses from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -18.3%

Answer: -18.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of allowances from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -21.1%.

Rejected response: 148.4%.

AMT || what is the percentage change in the balance of allowances <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of allowances from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: -21.1%

the balance as of january 1 , of 2010 is $ 28520 ; the balance as of january 1 , of 2009 is $ 11482 ; the balance as of january 1 , of 2008 is $ 8850 ;

the balance as of december 31 , of 2010 is $ 22505 ; the balance as of december 31 , of 2009 is $ 28520 ; the balance as of december 31 , of 2008 is $ 11482 ;

the current year increases of 2010 is 16219 ; the current year increases of 2009 is 26771 ; the current year increases of 2008 is 12059 ;

Answer: -21.1%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of allowances from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: 148.4%

Answer: 148.4%