Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of allowances from 2008 to 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 148.4%.

Rejected response: -21.1%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of allowances from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: 148.4%

the balance as of january 1 , of 2010 is $ 28520 ; the balance as of january 1 , of 2009 is $ 11482 ; the balance as of january 1 , of 2008 is $ 8850 ;

the current year increases of 2010 is 16219 ; the current year increases of 2009 is 26771 ; the current year increases of 2008 is 12059 ;

the balance as of december 31 , of 2010 is $ 22505 ; the balance as of december 31 , of 2009 is $ 28520 ; the balance as of december 31 , of 2008 is $ 11482 ;

Answer: 148.4%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of allowances from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: -21.1%

Answer: -21.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of consumer packaging sales in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 58%.

Rejected response: 59%.

IP || what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of consumer packaging sales <TIME>?

Question: what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of consumer packaging sales in 2013?

Answer: 58%

multiply(const_2, const_1000), divide(#0, 3435)

in millions the sales of 2014 is $ 3403 ; the sales of 2013 is $ 3435 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 3170 ;

north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2014 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2013 and $ 2.0 billion in 2012 .

in millions the operating profit of 2014 is 178 ; the operating profit of 2013 is 161 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 268 ;

Answer: 58%

Question: what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of consumer packaging sales in 2014?

Answer: 59%

multiply(const_2, const_1000), divide(#0, 3403)

Answer: 59%

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of consumer packaging sales in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 59%.

Rejected response: 58%.

Question: what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of consumer packaging sales in 2014?

Answer: 59%

multiply(const_2, const_1000), divide(#0, 3403)

in millions the sales of 2014 is $ 3403 ; the sales of 2013 is $ 3435 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 3170 ;

in millions the operating profit of 2014 is 178 ; the operating profit of 2013 is 161 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 268 ;

north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2014 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2013 and $ 2.0 billion in 2012 .

Answer: 59%

Question: what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of consumer packaging sales in 2013?

Answer: 58%

multiply(const_2, const_1000), divide(#0, 3435)

Answer: 58%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of total liabilities for litigation settlements during 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -73.

Rejected response: 1332.

MA || what is the net change in the balance of total liabilities for litigation settlements <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of total liabilities for litigation settlements during 2007?

Answer: -73

balance as of december 31 2006 the balance as of december 31 2007 of $ 477 is $ 404 ;

total liabilities for litigation settlements changed from december 31 , 2006 , as follows : ( in millions ) .

we recorded liabilities for certain litigation settlements in prior periods .

balance as of december 31 2006 the balance as of december 31 2006 of $ 477 is $ 477 ;

balance as of december 31 2006 the balance as of december 31 2008 of $ 477 is $ 1736 ;

Answer: -73

Question: what is the net change in the balance of total liabilities for litigation settlements during 2008?

Answer: 1332

Answer: 1332


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of total liabilities for litigation settlements during 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1332.

Rejected response: -73.

Question: what is the net change in the balance of total liabilities for litigation settlements during 2008?

Answer: 1332

balance as of december 31 2006 the balance as of december 31 2006 of $ 477 is $ 477 ;

balance as of december 31 2006 the balance as of december 31 2007 of $ 477 is $ 404 ;

balance as of december 31 2006 the balance as of december 31 2008 of $ 477 is $ 1736 ;

Answer: 1332

Question: what is the net change in the balance of total liabilities for litigation settlements during 2007?

Answer: -73

Answer: -73


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in pre-tax earnings for the institutional client services segment between 2012 and 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -30%.

Rejected response: 10%.

GS || what was the percentage change in pre-tax earnings for the institutional client services segment <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in pre-tax earnings for the institutional client services segment between 2012 and 2013?

Answer: -30%

$ in millions the pre-tax earnings of year ended december 2014 is $ 4317 ; the pre-tax earnings of year ended december 2013 is $ 3929 ; the pre-tax earnings of year ended december 2012 is $ 5634 ;

management 2019s discussion and analysis institutional client services our institutional client services segment is comprised of : fixed income , currency and commodities client execution .

the table below presents the operating results of our institutional client services segment. .

Answer: -30%

Question: what was the percentage change in pre-tax earnings for the institutional client services segment between 2013 and 2014?

Answer: 10%

Answer: 10%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in pre-tax earnings for the institutional client services segment between 2013 and 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10%.

Rejected response: -30%.

Question: what was the percentage change in pre-tax earnings for the institutional client services segment between 2013 and 2014?

Answer: 10%

the table below presents the operating results of our institutional client services segment. .

$ in millions the pre-tax earnings of year ended december 2014 is $ 4317 ; the pre-tax earnings of year ended december 2013 is $ 3929 ; the pre-tax earnings of year ended december 2012 is $ 5634 ;

Answer: 10%

Question: what was the percentage change in pre-tax earnings for the institutional client services segment between 2012 and 2013?

Answer: -30%

Answer: -30%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of non-controlling interests from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 14.9%.

Rejected response: 3.2%.

CME || what is the percentage change in the balance of non-controlling interests <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of non-controlling interests from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 14.9%

( in millions ) the balance at december 31 of 2012 is $ 80.8 ; the balance at december 31 of 2011 is $ 70.3 ; the balance at december 31 of 2010 is $ 68.1 ;

non- controlling interests that do not contain redemption features are presented in the statements of equity. .

redeemable non-controlling interest the following summarizes the changes in redeemable non-controlling interest for the years presented .

( in millions ) the balance at january 1 of 2012 is $ 70.3 ; the balance at january 1 of 2011 is $ 68.1 ; the balance at january 1 of 2010 is $ 2014 ;

( in millions ) the total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest of 2012 is 10.5 ; the total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest of 2011 is 2.1 ; the total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest of 2010 is 0.6 ;

Answer: 14.9%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of non-controlling interests from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 3.2%

( in millions ) The balance at january 1 of 2012 is $ 70.3 ; The balance at january 1 of 2011 is $ 68.1 ; The balance at january 1 of 2010 is $ 2014 ;

Answer: 3.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of non-controlling interests from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.2%.

Rejected response: 14.9%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of non-controlling interests from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 3.2%

( in millions ) the balance at january 1 of 2012 is $ 70.3 ; the balance at january 1 of 2011 is $ 68.1 ; the balance at january 1 of 2010 is $ 2014 ;

( in millions ) the total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest of 2012 is 10.5 ; the total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest of 2011 is 2.1 ; the total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest of 2010 is 0.6 ;

( in millions ) the balance at december 31 of 2012 is $ 80.8 ; the balance at december 31 of 2011 is $ 70.3 ; the balance at december 31 of 2010 is $ 68.1 ;

Answer: 3.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of non-controlling interests from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 14.9%

Answer: 14.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the change in liability balance during 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -216.

Rejected response: 38.

PM || what is the change in liability balance <TIME>?

Question: what is the change in liability balance during 2015?

Answer: -216

liability balance january 1 2014 the liability balance december 31 2014 of $ 308 is $ 270 ;

liability balance january 1 2014 the liability balance december 31 2015 of $ 308 is $ 54 ;

liability balance january 1 2014 The charges net of $ 308 is 68 ;

liability balance january 1 2014 the charges net of $ 308 is 68 ;

Answer: -216

Question: what is the change in liability balance during 2014?

Answer: 38

liability balance january 1 2014 The liability balance december 31 2015 of $ 308 is $ 54 ;

liability balance january 1 2014 the liability balance january 1 2014 of $ 308 is $ 308 ;

Answer: 38


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the change in liability balance during 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 38.

Rejected response: -216.

Question: what is the change in liability balance during 2014?

Answer: 38

liability balance january 1 2014 the liability balance january 1 2014 of $ 308 is $ 308 ;

liability balance january 1 2014 the liability balance december 31 2014 of $ 308 is $ 270 ;

liability balance january 1 2014 the liability balance december 31 2015 of $ 308 is $ 54 ;

Answer: 38

Question: what is the change in liability balance during 2015?

Answer: -216

liability balance january 1 2014 the charges net of $ 308 is 68 ;

Answer: -216


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2013 and 2012 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 118.

Rejected response: 179.

PNC || what was the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested <TIME> and <TIME> in millions?

Question: what was the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2013 and 2012 in millions?

Answer: 118

during 2013 , we issued approximately 2.6 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity .

the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was approximately $ 63 million , $ 55 million and $ 52 million , respectively .

incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/share unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/share unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock on the date of grant .

shares in thousands december 31 2012 the december 31 2013 of nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 1119 is 1647 ; the december 31 2013 of weighted- average grant date fair value $ 61.14 is $ 63.49 ; the december 31 2013 of nonvested restricted stock/ share units 3061 is 3483 ; the december 31 2013 of weighted- average grant date fair value $ 60.04 is $ 62.70 ;

Answer: 118

Question: what was the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2014 and 2013 in millions?

Answer: 179

as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises .

the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was approximately $ 119 million , $ 63 million and $ 55 million , respectively .

shares in thousands december 31 2013 the december 31 2014 of nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 1647 is 1837 ; the december 31 2014 of weighted-averagegrant datefair value $ 63.49 is $ 69.84 ; the december 31 2014 of nonvested restricted stock/ share units 3483 is 3652 ; the december 31 2014 of weighted-averagegrant datefair value $ 62.70 is $ 69.03 ;

Answer: 179


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2014 and 2013 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 179.

Rejected response: 118.

Question: what was the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2014 and 2013 in millions?

Answer: 179

as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises .

the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was approximately $ 119 million , $ 63 million and $ 55 million , respectively .

shares in thousands december 31 2013 the december 31 2014 of nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 1647 is 1837 ; the december 31 2014 of weighted-averagegrant datefair value $ 63.49 is $ 69.84 ; the december 31 2014 of nonvested restricted stock/ share units 3483 is 3652 ; the december 31 2014 of weighted-averagegrant datefair value $ 62.70 is $ 69.03 ;

Answer: 179

Question: what was the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2013 and 2012 in millions?

Answer: 118

during 2013 , we issued approximately 2.6 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity .

the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was approximately $ 63 million , $ 55 million and $ 52 million , respectively .

shares in thousands december 31 2012 the december 31 2013 of nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 1119 is 1647 ; the december 31 2013 of weighted- average grant date fair value $ 61.14 is $ 63.49 ; the december 31 2013 of nonvested restricted stock/ share units 3061 is 3483 ; the december 31 2013 of weighted- average grant date fair value $ 60.04 is $ 62.70 ;

Answer: 118


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2016 and 2018?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -55%.

Rejected response: -72%.

C || what was the percentage change in total operating expenses <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2016 and 2018?

Answer: -55%

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2018 is $ 2272 ; the total operating expenses of 2017 is $ 3814 ; the total operating expenses of 2016 is $ 5042 ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change2018 vs . 2017 is ( 40 ) % ( % ) ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change2017 vs . 2016 is ( 24 ) % ( % ) ;

in millions of dollars 2018 2017 2016 % (  % ) change 2018 vs .

provisions decreased $ 27 million to a net benefit of $ 202 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release .

Answer: -55%

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2007 and 2008?

Answer: -72%

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2009 is $ 1420 ; the total operating expenses of 2008 is $ 510 ; the total operating expenses of 2007 is $ 1813 ;

in millions of dollars The total revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ -10556 ( 10556 ) ; The total revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -2258 ( 2258 ) ; The total revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -2310 ( 2310 ) ;

operating expenses declined , primarily due to lower restructuring charges in 2008 as well as reductions in incentive compensation and benefits expense. .

in millions of dollars the total revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ -10556 ( 10556 ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -2258 ( 2258 ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -2310 ( 2310 ) ;

2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities .

Answer: -72%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2016 and 2018?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -55%.

Rejected response: 178%.

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2016 and 2018?

Answer: -55%

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2018 is $ 2272 ; the total operating expenses of 2017 is $ 3814 ; the total operating expenses of 2016 is $ 5042 ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change2018 vs . 2017 is ( 40 ) % ( % ) ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change2017 vs . 2016 is ( 24 ) % ( % ) ;

provisions decreased $ 27 million to a net benefit of $ 202 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release .

Answer: -55%

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: 178%

in millions of dollars the total revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ -10556 ( 10556 ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -2258 ( 2258 ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -2310 ( 2310 ) ;

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2009 is $ 1420 ; the total operating expenses of 2008 is $ 510 ; the total operating expenses of 2007 is $ 1813 ;

2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities .

Answer: 178%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2007 and 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -72%.

Rejected response: -55%.

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2007 and 2008?

Answer: -72%

in millions of dollars the total revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ -10556 ( 10556 ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -2258 ( 2258 ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -2310 ( 2310 ) ;

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2009 is $ 1420 ; the total operating expenses of 2008 is $ 510 ; the total operating expenses of 2007 is $ 1813 ;

2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities .

Answer: -72%

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2016 and 2018?

Answer: -55%

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2018 is $ 2272 ; the total operating expenses of 2017 is $ 3814 ; the total operating expenses of 2016 is $ 5042 ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change2018 vs . 2017 is ( 40 ) % ( % ) ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change2017 vs . 2016 is ( 24 ) % ( % ) ;

provisions decreased $ 27 million to a net benefit of $ 202 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release .

Answer: -55%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2007 and 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -72%.

Rejected response: 178%.

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2007 and 2008?

Answer: -72%

in millions of dollars the total revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ -10556 ( 10556 ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -2258 ( 2258 ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -2310 ( 2310 ) ;

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2009 is $ 1420 ; the total operating expenses of 2008 is $ 510 ; the total operating expenses of 2007 is $ 1813 ;

2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities .

Answer: -72%

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: 178%

Answer: 178%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2008 and 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 178%.

Rejected response: -55%.

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: 178%

in millions of dollars the total revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ -10556 ( 10556 ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -2258 ( 2258 ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -2310 ( 2310 ) ;

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2009 is $ 1420 ; the total operating expenses of 2008 is $ 510 ; the total operating expenses of 2007 is $ 1813 ;

2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities .

Answer: 178%

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2016 and 2018?

Answer: -55%

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2018 is $ 2272 ; the total operating expenses of 2017 is $ 3814 ; the total operating expenses of 2016 is $ 5042 ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change2018 vs . 2017 is ( 40 ) % ( % ) ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change2017 vs . 2016 is ( 24 ) % ( % ) ;

provisions decreased $ 27 million to a net benefit of $ 202 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release .

Answer: -55%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2008 and 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 178%.

Rejected response: -72%.

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: 178%

in millions of dollars the total revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ -10556 ( 10556 ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -2258 ( 2258 ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -2310 ( 2310 ) ;

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2009 is $ 1420 ; the total operating expenses of 2008 is $ 510 ; the total operating expenses of 2007 is $ 1813 ;

2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities .

Answer: 178%

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2007 and 2008?

Answer: -72%

Answer: -72%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenues investing & lending segment were attributable to equity securities in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 48%.

Rejected response: 56%.

GS || what percentage of total net revenues investing & lending segment were attributable to equity securities <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total net revenues investing & lending segment were attributable to equity securities in 2012?

Answer: 48%

in millions the equity securities of year ended december 2013 is $ 3930 ; the equity securities of year ended december 2012 is $ 2800 ; the equity securities of year ended december 2011 is $ 603 ;

in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2013 is 7018 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2012 is 5891 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2011 is 2142 ;

the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .

Answer: 48%

Question: what percentage of total net revenues investing & lending segment were attributable to equity securities in 2013?

Answer: 56%

Answer: 56%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenues investing & lending segment were attributable to equity securities in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 56%.

Rejected response: 48%.

Question: what percentage of total net revenues investing & lending segment were attributable to equity securities in 2013?

Answer: 56%

the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .

in millions the equity securities of year ended december 2013 is $ 3930 ; the equity securities of year ended december 2012 is $ 2800 ; the equity securities of year ended december 2011 is $ 603 ;

in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2013 is 7018 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2012 is 5891 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2011 is 2142 ;

Answer: 56%

Question: what percentage of total net revenues investing & lending segment were attributable to equity securities in 2012?

Answer: 48%

Answer: 48%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what are the natural gas prices as a percentage of wti oil prices in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5.82%.

Rejected response: 5.89%.

BKR || what are the natural gas prices as a percentage of wti oil prices <TIME>?

Question: what are the natural gas prices as a percentage of wti oil prices in 2016?

Answer: 5.82%

the wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) of 2017 is 50.80 ; the wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) of 2016 is 43.29 ; the wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) of 2015 is 48.66 ;

the natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) of 2017 is 2.99 ; the natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) of 2016 is 2.52 ; the natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) of 2015 is 2.62 ;

oil and natural gas prices oil and natural gas prices are summarized in the table below as averages of the daily closing prices during each of the periods indicated. .

Answer: 5.82%

Question: what are the natural gas prices as a percentage of wti oil prices in 2017?

Answer: 5.89%

Answer: 5.89%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what are the natural gas prices as a percentage of wti oil prices in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5.89%.

Rejected response: 5.82%.

Question: what are the natural gas prices as a percentage of wti oil prices in 2017?

Answer: 5.89%

oil and natural gas prices oil and natural gas prices are summarized in the table below as averages of the daily closing prices during each of the periods indicated. .

the wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) of 2017 is 50.80 ; the wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) of 2016 is 43.29 ; the wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) of 2015 is 48.66 ;

the natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) of 2017 is 2.99 ; the natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) of 2016 is 2.52 ; the natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) of 2015 is 2.62 ;

Answer: 5.89%

Question: what are the natural gas prices as a percentage of wti oil prices in 2016?

Answer: 5.82%

Answer: 5.82%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the increase observed in the interest net of capitalized interest during 2015 and 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.5%.

Rejected response: 9.235%.

EOG || what is the increase observed in the interest net of capitalized interest <TIME> and <TIME>?

Question: what is the increase observed in the interest net of capitalized interest during 2015 and 2016?

Answer: 13.5%

Explanation: it is the interest net of capitalized interest of 2016 divided by the 2015's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage .

the interest net of capitalized interest of 2016 is $ 252030 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2015 is $ 222088 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2014 is $ 197383 ;

The income taxes net of refunds received of 2016 is $ -39293 ( 39293 ) ; The income taxes net of refunds received of 2015 is $ 41108 ; The income taxes net of refunds received of 2014 is $ 342741 ;

supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 ( in thousands ) : .

shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 10.3 million , 10.2 million and 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

Answer: 13.5%

Question: what is the increase observed in the interest net of capitalized interest during 2016 and 2017?

Answer: 9.235%

Explanation: it is the cash paid as interest net of capitalized interest in 2017 divided by the 2016's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase .

the interest net of capitalized interest of 2017 is $ 275305 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2016 is $ 252030 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2015 is $ 222088 ;

The income taxes net of refunds received of 2017 is $ 188946 ; The income taxes net of refunds received of 2016 is $ -39293 ( 39293 ) ; The income taxes net of refunds received of 2015 is $ 41108 ;

supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in thousands ) : .

shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 2.6 million , 10.3 million and 10.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

Answer: 9.235%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the increase observed in the interest net of capitalized interest during 2016 and 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9.235%.

Rejected response: 13.5%.

Question: what is the increase observed in the interest net of capitalized interest during 2016 and 2017?

Answer: 9.235%

Explanation: it is the cash paid as interest net of capitalized interest in 2017 divided by the 2016's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase .

shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 2.6 million , 10.3 million and 10.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in thousands ) : .

the interest net of capitalized interest of 2017 is $ 275305 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2016 is $ 252030 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2015 is $ 222088 ;

Answer: 9.235%

Question: what is the increase observed in the interest net of capitalized interest during 2015 and 2016?

Answer: 13.5%

Explanation: it is the interest net of capitalized interest of 2016 divided by the 2015's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage .

shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 10.3 million , 10.2 million and 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 ( in thousands ) : .

the interest net of capitalized interest of 2016 is $ 252030 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2015 is $ 222088 ; the interest net of capitalized interest of 2014 is $ 197383 ;

Answer: 13.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the number of employees from 2000 to 2001?
Reference time interval: 2000-01-01 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12.2%.

Rejected response: 2.3%.

STT || what is the growth rate in the number of employees <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in the number of employees from 2000 to 2001?

Answer: 12.2%

( dollars in millions ) the number of employees of 2001 is 19753 ; the number of employees of 2000 is 17604 ; the number of employees of 1999 is 17213 ; the number of employees of change 00-01 is 12 ; the number of employees of adjusted change 00-01 ( 1 ) is ;

state street successfully reduced the growth rate of expenses as revenue growth slowed during the latter half of 2000 and early 2001 .

expense growth in 2001 of 10% ( 10 % ) is significantly lower than the comparable 20% ( 20 % ) expense growth for 2000 compared to 1999 .

( dollars in millions ) the salaries and employee benefits of 2001 is $ 1663 ; the salaries and employee benefits of 2000 is $ 1524 ; the salaries and employee benefits of 1999 is $ 1313 ; the salaries and employee benefits of change 00-01 is 9% ( 9 % ) ; the salaries and employee benefits of adjusted change 00-01 ( 1 ) is 11% ( 11 % ) ;

Answer: 12.2%

Question: what is the growth rate in the number of employees from 1999 to 2000?

Answer: 2.3%

occupancy expensewas $ 229million , up 15% ( 15 % ) .

Answer: 2.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the number of employees from 1999 to 2000?
Reference time interval: 1999-01-01 00:00:00 to 2001-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.3%.

Rejected response: 12.2%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the number of employees from 1999 to 2000?

Answer: 2.3%

( dollars in millions ) the salaries and employee benefits of 2001 is $ 1663 ; the salaries and employee benefits of 2000 is $ 1524 ; the salaries and employee benefits of 1999 is $ 1313 ; the salaries and employee benefits of change 00-01 is 9% ( 9 % ) ; the salaries and employee benefits of adjusted change 00-01 ( 1 ) is 11% ( 11 % ) ;

( dollars in millions ) the number of employees of 2001 is 19753 ; the number of employees of 2000 is 17604 ; the number of employees of 1999 is 17213 ; the number of employees of change 00-01 is 12 ; the number of employees of adjusted change 00-01 ( 1 ) is ;

occupancy expensewas $ 229million , up 15% ( 15 % ) .

Answer: 2.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in the number of employees from 2000 to 2001?

Answer: 12.2%

expense growth in 2001 of 10% ( 10 % ) is significantly lower than the comparable 20% ( 20 % ) expense growth for 2000 compared to 1999 .

Answer: 12.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the increase in the revenue from 2010 to 2011
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 113%.

Rejected response: 6.1%.

AON || what was the percent of the increase in the revenue <TIME>

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the revenue from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 113%

Explanation: the revenue increase 113% from 2010 to 2011

years ended december 31 , the revenue of 2011 is $ 4501 ; the revenue of 2010 is $ 2111 ; the revenue of 2009 is $ 1267 ;

operating income operating income increased $ 120 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , from 2010 to $ 1.3 billion in 2011 .

in 2011 , operating income margins in this segment were 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) , up 70 basis points from 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) in 2010 .

effective january 1 , 2012 , this line of business will be included in the results of the risk solutions segment .

2022 benefits administration applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services .

Answer: 113%

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the revenue from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 6.1%

Explanation: the revenue increased by 6.1% from 2010 to 2011

years ended december 31 , the revenue of 2011 is $ 6817 ; the revenue of 2010 is $ 6423 ; the revenue of 2009 is $ 6305 ;

years ended december 31, The operating income of 2011 is 1314 ; The operating income of 2010 is 1194 ; The operating income of 2009 is 900 ;

the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is closely correlated with employment levels , corporate revenue and asset values .

in 2011 , pricing showed signs of stabilization and improvement in both our retail and reinsurance brokerage product lines and we expect this trend to slowly continue into 2012 .

weak global economic conditions have reduced our customers 2019 demand for our brokerage products , which have had a negative impact on our operational results .

Answer: 6.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the increase in the revenue from 2010 to 2011
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6.1%.

Rejected response: 113%.

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the revenue from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 6.1%

Explanation: the revenue increased by 6.1% from 2010 to 2011

years ended december 31 , the revenue of 2011 is $ 6817 ; the revenue of 2010 is $ 6423 ; the revenue of 2009 is $ 6305 ;

in 2011 , pricing showed signs of stabilization and improvement in both our retail and reinsurance brokerage product lines and we expect this trend to slowly continue into 2012 .

weak global economic conditions have reduced our customers 2019 demand for our brokerage products , which have had a negative impact on our operational results .

Answer: 6.1%

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the revenue from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 113%

Explanation: the revenue increase 113% from 2010 to 2011

years ended december 31 , the revenue of 2011 is $ 4501 ; the revenue of 2010 is $ 2111 ; the revenue of 2009 is $ 1267 ;

effective january 1 , 2012 , this line of business will be included in the results of the risk solutions segment .

2022 benefits administration applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services .

Answer: 113%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total credit commitments as of december 31 , 2018 are credit card lines?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 68%.

Rejected response: 69%.

C || what percentage of total credit commitments as of december 31 , <TIME> are credit card lines?

Question: what percentage of total credit commitments as of december 31 , 2018 are credit card lines?

Answer: 68%

in millions of dollars the credit card lines of u.s . is 605857 ; the credit card lines of outside ofu.s . is 90150 ; the credit card lines of december 312018 is 696007 ; the credit card lines of december 31 2017 is 678300 ;

in millions of dollars the total of u.s . is $ 815729 ; the total of outside ofu.s . is $ 203165 ; the total of december 312018 is $ 1018894 ; the total of december 31 2017 is $ 985174 ;

credit card lines citigroup provides credit to customers by issuing credit cards .

credit commitments and lines of credit the table below summarizes citigroup 2019s credit commitments : in millions of dollars u.s .

Answer: 68%

Question: what percentage of total credit commitments as of december 31 , 2017 are credit card lines?

Answer: 69%

Answer: 69%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total credit commitments as of december 31 , 2017 are credit card lines?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 69%.

Rejected response: 68%.

Question: what percentage of total credit commitments as of december 31 , 2017 are credit card lines?

Answer: 69%

in millions of dollars the credit card lines of u.s . is 605857 ; the credit card lines of outside ofu.s . is 90150 ; the credit card lines of december 312018 is 696007 ; the credit card lines of december 31 2017 is 678300 ;

in millions of dollars the total of u.s . is $ 815729 ; the total of outside ofu.s . is $ 203165 ; the total of december 312018 is $ 1018894 ; the total of december 31 2017 is $ 985174 ;

Answer: 69%

Question: what percentage of total credit commitments as of december 31 , 2018 are credit card lines?

Answer: 68%

credit commitments and lines of credit the table below summarizes citigroup 2019s credit commitments : in millions of dollars u.s .

Answer: 68%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rent expense under operating leases from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 25%.

Rejected response: 44%.

AAPL || what was the percentage change in rent expense under operating leases <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in rent expense under operating leases from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 25%

rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 488 million , $ 338 million and $ 271 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .

as of september 29 , 2012 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 4.4 billion , of which $ 3.1 billion related to leases for retail space .

future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2012 , are as follows ( in millions ) : .

in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 988 million as of september 29 , 2012 , which were comprised mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations .

contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been fully adjudicated , certain of which are discussed in part i , item 3 of this form 10-k under the heading 201clegal proceedings 201d and in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors . 201d in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies .

Answer: 25%

Question: what was the percentage change in rent expense under operating leases from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 44%

Answer: 44%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rent expense under operating leases from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 44%.

Rejected response: 25%.

Question: what was the percentage change in rent expense under operating leases from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 44%

rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 488 million , $ 338 million and $ 271 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .

in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 988 million as of september 29 , 2012 , which were comprised mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations .

contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been fully adjudicated , certain of which are discussed in part i , item 3 of this form 10-k under the heading 201clegal proceedings 201d and in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors . 201d in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies .

Answer: 44%

Question: what was the percentage change in rent expense under operating leases from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 25%

Answer: 25%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2000 to 2001?
Reference time interval: 2000-01-01 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3.3%.

Rejected response: -36.4%.

AMT || what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2000 to 2001?

Answer: -3.3%

the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .

under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .

retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .

accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .

Answer: -3.3%

Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2001 to 2002?

Answer: -36.4%

Answer: -36.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2001 to 2002?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2003-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -36.4%.

Rejected response: -3.3%.

Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2001 to 2002?

Answer: -36.4%

the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .

accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .

Answer: -36.4%

Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2000 to 2001?

Answer: -3.3%

Answer: -3.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenues in the investing & lending segment is attributable to equity securities in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 67%.

Rejected response: 70%.

GS || what percentage of total net revenues in the investing & lending segment is attributable to equity securities <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total net revenues in the investing & lending segment is attributable to equity securities in 2014?

Answer: 67%

$ in millions the equity securities of year ended december 2015 is $ 3781 ; the equity securities of year ended december 2014 is $ 4579 ; the equity securities of year ended december 2013 is $ 4974 ;

$ in millions the total net revenues1 of year ended december 2015 is 5436 ; the total net revenues1 of year ended december 2014 is 6825 ; the total net revenues1 of year ended december 2013 is 7018 ;

the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .

Answer: 67%

Question: what percentage of total net revenues in the investing & lending segment is attributable to equity securities in 2015?

Answer: 70%

Answer: 70%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenues in the investing & lending segment is attributable to equity securities in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 70%.

Rejected response: 67%.

Question: what percentage of total net revenues in the investing & lending segment is attributable to equity securities in 2015?

Answer: 70%

the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .

$ in millions the equity securities of year ended december 2015 is $ 3781 ; the equity securities of year ended december 2014 is $ 4579 ; the equity securities of year ended december 2013 is $ 4974 ;

$ in millions the total net revenues1 of year ended december 2015 is 5436 ; the total net revenues1 of year ended december 2014 is 6825 ; the total net revenues1 of year ended december 2013 is 7018 ;

Answer: 70%

Question: what percentage of total net revenues in the investing & lending segment is attributable to equity securities in 2014?

Answer: 67%

Answer: 67%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance valuation allowance rollforward during 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2.2%.

Rejected response: 31.4%.

WELL || what is the percentage change in the balance valuation allowance rollforward <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance valuation allowance rollforward during 2016?

Answer: -2.2%

2016 the beginning balance of year ended december 31 2017 2016 is $ 96838 ; the beginning balance of year ended december 31 2017 2016 is $ 98966 ; the beginning balance of year ended december 31 2017 is $ 85207 ;

2016 the expense ( benefit ) of year ended december 31 2017 2016 is 30445 ; the expense ( benefit ) of year ended december 31 2017 2016 is -2128 ( 2128 ) ; the expense ( benefit ) of year ended december 31 2017 is 13759 ;

the valuation allowance rollforward is summarized as follows for the periods presented ( in thousands ) : year ended december 31 , 2017 2016 2015 .

2016 the ending balance of year ended december 31 2017 2016 is $ 127283 ; the ending balance of year ended december 31 2017 2016 is $ 96838 ; the ending balance of year ended december 31 2017 is $ 98966 ;

Answer: -2.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance valuation allowance rollforward during 2017?

Answer: 31.4%

Answer: 31.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance valuation allowance rollforward during 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 31.4%.

Rejected response: -2.2%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance valuation allowance rollforward during 2017?

Answer: 31.4%

2016 the beginning balance of year ended december 31 2017 2016 is $ 96838 ; the beginning balance of year ended december 31 2017 2016 is $ 98966 ; the beginning balance of year ended december 31 2017 is $ 85207 ;

2016 the expense ( benefit ) of year ended december 31 2017 2016 is 30445 ; the expense ( benefit ) of year ended december 31 2017 2016 is -2128 ( 2128 ) ; the expense ( benefit ) of year ended december 31 2017 is 13759 ;

2016 the ending balance of year ended december 31 2017 2016 is $ 127283 ; the ending balance of year ended december 31 2017 2016 is $ 96838 ; the ending balance of year ended december 31 2017 is $ 98966 ;

Answer: 31.4%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance valuation allowance rollforward during 2016?

Answer: -2.2%

Answer: -2.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total value of repurchased shares during december 2012 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2012-12-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 128.4.

Rejected response: 78.7.

LMT || what is the total value of repurchased shares <TIME> , in millions?

Question: what is the total value of repurchased shares during december 2012 , in millions?

Answer: 128.4

period the november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012 of total number of shares purchased is 1395288 ; the november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012 of average price paid per share is 92.02 ; the november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) is 1395288 ; the november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012 of amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ) is 2315 ;

as of december 31 , 2012 , we had repurchased a total of 54.3 million shares under the program for $ 4.2 billion. .

( a ) we repurchased a total of 3.1 million shares of our common stock for $ 286 million during the quarter ended december 31 , 2012 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2010 .

period the total of total number of shares purchased is 3110706 ; the total of average price paid per share is $ 92.07 ; the total of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) is 3110706 ; the total of amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ) is $ 2315 ;

Answer: 128.4

Question: what is the total value of repurchased shares during october 2012 , in millions?

Answer: 78.7

period the october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012 of total number of shares purchased is 842445 ; the october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012 of average price paid per share is $ 93.38 ; the october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) is 842445 ; the october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012 of amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ) is $ 2522 ;

period The october 29 2012 2013 november 25 2012 of total number of shares purchased is 872973 ; The october 29 2012 2013 november 25 2012 of average price paid per share is 90.86 ; The october 29 2012 2013 november 25 2012 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) is 872973 ; The october 29 2012 2013 november 25 2012 of amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ) is 2443 ;

Answer: 78.7


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total value of repurchased shares during october 2012 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2012-10-01 00:00:00 to 2012-11-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 78.7.

Rejected response: 128.4.

Question: what is the total value of repurchased shares during october 2012 , in millions?

Answer: 78.7

period the october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012 of total number of shares purchased is 842445 ; the october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012 of average price paid per share is $ 93.38 ; the october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) is 842445 ; the october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012 of amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ) is $ 2522 ;

period the total of total number of shares purchased is 3110706 ; the total of average price paid per share is $ 92.07 ; the total of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) is 3110706 ; the total of amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ) is $ 2315 ;

( a ) we repurchased a total of 3.1 million shares of our common stock for $ 286 million during the quarter ended december 31 , 2012 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2010 .

Answer: 78.7

Question: what is the total value of repurchased shares during december 2012 , in millions?

Answer: 128.4

period the november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012 of total number of shares purchased is 1395288 ; the november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012 of average price paid per share is 92.02 ; the november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) is 1395288 ; the november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012 of amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ) is 2315 ;

as of december 31 , 2012 , we had repurchased a total of 54.3 million shares under the program for $ 4.2 billion. .

Answer: 128.4


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference between u.s . gaap and adjusted effective income tax rate 2014non-gaap in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -6.4%.

Rejected response: 9.3%.

MS || what is the difference between u.s . gaap and adjusted effective income tax rate 2014non-gaap <TIME>?

Question: what is the difference between u.s . gaap and adjusted effective income tax rate 2014non-gaap in 2015?

Answer: -6.4%

the adjusted effective income taxrate 2014non-gaap1 of 2017 is 30.8% ( 30.8 % ) ; the adjusted effective income taxrate 2014non-gaap1 of 2016 is 31.6% ( 31.6 % ) ; the adjusted effective income taxrate 2014non-gaap1 of 2015 is 32.3% ( 32.3 % ) ;

for 2015 , adjusted effective income tax rate also excludes dva .

Answer: -6.4%

Question: what is the difference between u.s . gaap and adjusted effective income tax rate 2014non-gaap in 2017?

Answer: 9.3%

for further information on non-gaap measures , see 201cselected non-gaap financial information 201d herein .

Answer: 9.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference between u.s . gaap and adjusted effective income tax rate 2014non-gaap in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9.3%.

Rejected response: -6.4%.

Question: what is the difference between u.s . gaap and adjusted effective income tax rate 2014non-gaap in 2017?

Answer: 9.3%

the adjusted effective income taxrate 2014non-gaap1 of 2017 is 30.8% ( 30.8 % ) ; the adjusted effective income taxrate 2014non-gaap1 of 2016 is 31.6% ( 31.6 % ) ; the adjusted effective income taxrate 2014non-gaap1 of 2015 is 32.3% ( 32.3 % ) ;

Answer: 9.3%

Question: what is the difference between u.s . gaap and adjusted effective income tax rate 2014non-gaap in 2015?

Answer: -6.4%

Answer: -6.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total revenue was bayer healthcare in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 14%.

Rejected response: 18%.

REGN || what percentage of total revenue was bayer healthcare <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total revenue was bayer healthcare in 2008?

Answer: 14%

( in millions ) the bayer healthcare of 2009 is 67.3 ; the bayer healthcare of 2008 is 31.2 ;

( in millions ) the total revenue of 2009 is $ 379.3 ; the total revenue of 2008 is $ 238.5 ;

( in millions ) The total collaboration revenue of 2009 is 314.5 ; The total collaboration revenue of 2008 is 185.2 ;

( in millions ) the total collaboration revenue of 2009 is 314.5 ; the total collaboration revenue of 2008 is 185.2 ;

Answer: 14%

Question: what percentage of total revenue was bayer healthcare in 2009?

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total revenue was bayer healthcare in 2009?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 14%.

Question: what percentage of total revenue was bayer healthcare in 2009?

Answer: 18%

( in millions ) the bayer healthcare of 2009 is 67.3 ; the bayer healthcare of 2008 is 31.2 ;

( in millions ) the total collaboration revenue of 2009 is 314.5 ; the total collaboration revenue of 2008 is 185.2 ;

( in millions ) the total revenue of 2009 is $ 379.3 ; the total revenue of 2008 is $ 238.5 ;

Answer: 18%

Question: what percentage of total revenue was bayer healthcare in 2008?

Answer: 14%

Answer: 14%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets from 2009 to 2010
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.7%.

Rejected response: 55%.

DVN || what was the percentage change in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets <TIME>

Question: what was the percentage change in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets from 2009 to 2010

Answer: 13.7%

december 31 2009 the purchases of $ 51 is 3 ;

december 31 2009 the december 31 2010 of $ 51 is 58 ;

included below is a summary of the changes in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets ( in millions ) . .

december 31 2009 the december 31 2009 of $ 51 is $ 51 ;

Answer: 13.7%

Question: what was the percentage change in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 55%

december 31 2009 the december 31 2011 of $ 51 is $ 90 ;

Answer: 55%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets from 2010 to 2011
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 55%.

Rejected response: 13.7%.

Question: what was the percentage change in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 55%

december 31 2009 the purchases of $ 51 is 3 ;

december 31 2009 the december 31 2010 of $ 51 is 58 ;

december 31 2009 the december 31 2011 of $ 51 is $ 90 ;

Answer: 55%

Question: what was the percentage change in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets from 2009 to 2010

Answer: 13.7%

december 31 2009 the december 31 2009 of $ 51 is $ 51 ;

Answer: 13.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenues in the institutional client services segment was due to fixed income currency and commodities client execution in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 48%.

Rejected response: 56%.

GS || what percentage of total net revenues in the institutional client services segment was due to fixed income currency and commodities client execution <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total net revenues in the institutional client services segment was due to fixed income currency and commodities client execution in 2015?

Answer: 48%

$ in millions the fixed income currency and commodities client execution of year ended december 2015 is $ 7322 ; the fixed income currency and commodities client execution of year ended december 2014 is $ 8461 ; the fixed income currency and commodities client execution of year ended december 2013 is $ 8651 ;

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is 15151 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2014 is 15197 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2013 is 15721 ;

net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution were $ 7.32 billion for 2015 , 13% ( 13 % ) lower than 2014 .

$ in millions the total equities of year ended december 2015 is 7829 ; the total equities of year ended december 2014 is 6736 ; the total equities of year ended december 2013 is 7070 ;

Answer: 48%

Question: what percentage of total net revenues in the institutional client services segment was due to fixed income currency and commodities client execution in 2014?

Answer: 56%

Answer: 56%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenues in the institutional client services segment was due to fixed income currency and commodities client execution in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 56%.

Rejected response: 48%.

Question: what percentage of total net revenues in the institutional client services segment was due to fixed income currency and commodities client execution in 2014?

Answer: 56%

$ in millions the fixed income currency and commodities client execution of year ended december 2015 is $ 7322 ; the fixed income currency and commodities client execution of year ended december 2014 is $ 8461 ; the fixed income currency and commodities client execution of year ended december 2013 is $ 8651 ;

$ in millions the total equities of year ended december 2015 is 7829 ; the total equities of year ended december 2014 is 6736 ; the total equities of year ended december 2013 is 7070 ;

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is 15151 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2014 is 15197 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2013 is 15721 ;

Answer: 56%

Question: what percentage of total net revenues in the institutional client services segment was due to fixed income currency and commodities client execution in 2015?

Answer: 48%

Answer: 48%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total value of non-vested shares as of may 31 , 2008 , ( in millions ) ?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 20.2.

Rejected response: 32.0.

GPN || what is the total value of non-vested shares as of may 31 , <TIME> , ( in millions ) ?

Question: what is the total value of non-vested shares as of may 31 , 2008 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 20.2

multiply(518, 39), divide(#0, const_1000)

the non-vested at may 31 2008 of share awards is 518 ; the non-vested at may 31 2008 of weighted average grant-date fair value is 39 ;

The non-vested at may 31 2009 of share awards is 762 ; The non-vested at may 31 2009 of weighted average grant-date fair value is 42 ;

The non-vested at may 31 2007 of share awards is 278 ; The non-vested at may 31 2007 of weighted average grant-date fair value is $ 37 ;

the non-vested at may 31 2007 of share awards is 278 ; the non-vested at may 31 2007 of weighted average grant-date fair value is $ 37 ;

the non-vested at may 31 2009 of share awards is 762 ; the non-vested at may 31 2009 of weighted average grant-date fair value is 42 ;

Answer: 20.2

Question: what is the total value of non-vested shares as of may 31 , 2009 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 32.0

multiply(762, 42), divide(#0, const_1000)

The non-vested at may 31 2008 of share awards is 518 ; The non-vested at may 31 2008 of weighted average grant-date fair value is 39 ;

Answer: 32.0


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total value of non-vested shares as of may 31 , 2009 , ( in millions ) ?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 32.0.

Rejected response: 20.2.

Question: what is the total value of non-vested shares as of may 31 , 2009 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 32.0

multiply(762, 42), divide(#0, const_1000)

the non-vested at may 31 2007 of share awards is 278 ; the non-vested at may 31 2007 of weighted average grant-date fair value is $ 37 ;

the non-vested at may 31 2008 of share awards is 518 ; the non-vested at may 31 2008 of weighted average grant-date fair value is 39 ;

the non-vested at may 31 2009 of share awards is 762 ; the non-vested at may 31 2009 of weighted average grant-date fair value is 42 ;

Answer: 32.0

Question: what is the total value of non-vested shares as of may 31 , 2008 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 20.2

multiply(518, 39), divide(#0, const_1000)

Answer: 20.2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in pre-tax earnings in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -34.7%.

Rejected response: 11.3%.

GS || what is the growth rate in pre-tax earnings <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in pre-tax earnings in 2011?

Answer: -34.7%

in millions the pre-tax earnings of year ended december 2012 is $ 5644 ; the pre-tax earnings of year ended december 2011 is $ 4443 ; the pre-tax earnings of year ended december 2010 is $ 6802 ;

pre-tax earnings were $ 5.64 billion in 2012 , 27% ( 27 % ) higher than 2011 .

in addition , net revenues in credit products and interest rate products were solid and higher compared with 2011 .

management 2019s discussion and analysis the table below presents the operating results of our institutional client services segment. .

Answer: -34.7%

Question: what is the growth rate in pre-tax earnings in 2018?

Answer: 11.3%

$ in millions the pre-taxearnings of year ended december 2018 is $ 4211 ; the pre-taxearnings of year ended december 2017 is $ 3785 ; the pre-taxearnings of year ended december 2016 is $ 1694 ;

pre-tax earnings were $ 4.21 billion in 2018 , 11% ( 11 % ) higher than 2017 versus 2016 .

pre-tax earnings were $ 2.21 billion in 2017 , 54% ( 54 % ) lower than 2016 .

Answer: 11.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in pre-tax earnings in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11.3%.

Rejected response: -34.7%.

Question: what is the growth rate in pre-tax earnings in 2018?

Answer: 11.3%

pre-tax earnings were $ 2.21 billion in 2017 , 54% ( 54 % ) lower than 2016 .

$ in millions the pre-taxearnings of year ended december 2018 is $ 4211 ; the pre-taxearnings of year ended december 2017 is $ 3785 ; the pre-taxearnings of year ended december 2016 is $ 1694 ;

pre-tax earnings were $ 4.21 billion in 2018 , 11% ( 11 % ) higher than 2017 versus 2016 .

Answer: 11.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in pre-tax earnings in 2011?

Answer: -34.7%

management 2019s discussion and analysis the table below presents the operating results of our institutional client services segment. .

in millions the pre-tax earnings of year ended december 2012 is $ 5644 ; the pre-tax earnings of year ended december 2011 is $ 4443 ; the pre-tax earnings of year ended december 2010 is $ 6802 ;

pre-tax earnings were $ 5.64 billion in 2012 , 27% ( 27 % ) higher than 2011 .

Answer: -34.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in research and development expense from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -34.5%.

Rejected response: -7.7%.

CE || what is the percentage change in research and development expense <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in research and development expense from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -34.5%

research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

research and development our business models leverage innovation and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications .

we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives .

the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese .

Answer: -34.5%

Question: what is the percentage change in research and development expense from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -7.7%

Answer: -7.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in research and development expense from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -7.7%.

Rejected response: -34.5%.

Question: what is the percentage change in research and development expense from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -7.7%

research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives .

the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese .

Answer: -7.7%

Question: what is the percentage change in research and development expense from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -34.5%

Answer: -34.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenues in 2012 where due to equity securities ( excluding icbc ) revenues?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 41%.

Rejected response: 52%.

GS || what percentage of total net revenues <TIME> where due to equity securities ( excluding icbc ) revenues?

Question: what percentage of total net revenues in 2012 where due to equity securities ( excluding icbc ) revenues?

Answer: 41%

in millions the equity securities ( excluding icbc ) of year ended december 2012 is 2392 ; the equity securities ( excluding icbc ) of year ended december 2011 is 1120 ; the equity securities ( excluding icbc ) of year ended december 2010 is 2692 ;

in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2012 is 5891 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2011 is 2142 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2010 is 7541 ;

equities client execution net revenues were lower than 2010 , primarily reflecting significantly lower net revenues in shares .

in millions the icbc of year ended december 2012 is $ 408 ; the icbc of year ended december 2011 is $ -517 ( 517 ) ; the icbc of year ended december 2010 is $ 747 ;

Answer: 41%

Question: what percentage of total net revenues in 2011 where due to equity securities ( excluding icbc ) revenues?

Answer: 52%

Answer: 52%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenues in 2011 where due to equity securities ( excluding icbc ) revenues?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 52%.

Rejected response: 41%.

Question: what percentage of total net revenues in 2011 where due to equity securities ( excluding icbc ) revenues?

Answer: 52%

in millions the icbc of year ended december 2012 is $ 408 ; the icbc of year ended december 2011 is $ -517 ( 517 ) ; the icbc of year ended december 2010 is $ 747 ;

in millions the equity securities ( excluding icbc ) of year ended december 2012 is 2392 ; the equity securities ( excluding icbc ) of year ended december 2011 is 1120 ; the equity securities ( excluding icbc ) of year ended december 2010 is 2692 ;

in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2012 is 5891 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2011 is 2142 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2010 is 7541 ;

Answer: 52%

Question: what percentage of total net revenues in 2012 where due to equity securities ( excluding icbc ) revenues?

Answer: 41%

Answer: 41%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: interest and dividend income was what percent of total other income in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 125.

Rejected response: 201.

AAPL || interest and dividend income was what percent of total other income <TIME>?

Question: interest and dividend income was what percent of total other income in 2011?

Answer: 125

the interest and dividend income of 2011 is $ 519 ; the interest and dividend income of 2010 is $ 311 ; the interest and dividend income of 2009 is $ 407 ;

the total other income and expense of 2011 is $ 415 ; the total other income and expense of 2010 is $ 155 ; the total other income and expense of 2009 is $ 326 ;

other income and expense other income and expense for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 , are as follows ( in millions ) : .

Answer: 125

Question: interest and dividend income was what percent of total other income in 2010?

Answer: 201

Answer: 201


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: interest and dividend income was what percent of total other income in 2010?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 201.

Rejected response: 125.

Question: interest and dividend income was what percent of total other income in 2010?

Answer: 201

other income and expense other income and expense for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 , are as follows ( in millions ) : .

the interest and dividend income of 2011 is $ 519 ; the interest and dividend income of 2010 is $ 311 ; the interest and dividend income of 2009 is $ 407 ;

the total other income and expense of 2011 is $ 415 ; the total other income and expense of 2010 is $ 155 ; the total other income and expense of 2009 is $ 326 ;

Answer: 201

Question: interest and dividend income was what percent of total other income in 2011?

Answer: 125

Answer: 125


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5%.

Rejected response: 17%.

IP || what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: -5%

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2006 is $ 2074 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1622 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2004 is $ 1703 ;

industry segment operating profits are defined as earnings before taxes and minority interest , interest expense , corporate items and corporate special items .

results of operations industry segment operating profits are used by inter- national paper 2019s management to measure the earn- ings performance of its businesses .

in millions the discontinued operations of 2006 is -232 ( 232 ) ; the discontinued operations of 2005 is 416 ; the discontinued operations of 2004 is -273 ( 273 ) ;

in millions the net earnings ( loss ) of 2006 is $ 1050 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2005 is $ 1100 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2004 is $ -35 ( 35 ) ;

Answer: -5%

Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 17%

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2007 is $ 2423 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2006 is $ 2074 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1622 ;

industry segment operating profits of $ 2.4 billion were $ 349 million higher in 2007 than in 2006 due principally to the benefits from higher average price realizations ( $ 461 million ) , the net impact of cost reduction initiatives , improved operating perform- ance and a more favorable mix of products sold ( $ 304 million ) , higher sales volumes ( $ 17 million ) , lower special item costs ( $ 115 million ) and other items ( $ 4 million ) .

Answer: 17%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5%.

Rejected response: 28%.

Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: -5%

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2006 is $ 2074 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1622 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2004 is $ 1703 ;

in millions the discontinued operations of 2006 is -232 ( 232 ) ; the discontinued operations of 2005 is 416 ; the discontinued operations of 2004 is -273 ( 273 ) ;

in millions the net earnings ( loss ) of 2006 is $ 1050 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2005 is $ 1100 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2004 is $ -35 ( 35 ) ;

Answer: -5%

Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 28%

Answer: 28%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17%.

Rejected response: -5%.

Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 17%

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2007 is $ 2423 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2006 is $ 2074 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1622 ;

industry segment operating profits of $ 2.4 billion were $ 349 million higher in 2007 than in 2006 due principally to the benefits from higher average price realizations ( $ 461 million ) , the net impact of cost reduction initiatives , improved operating perform- ance and a more favorable mix of products sold ( $ 304 million ) , higher sales volumes ( $ 17 million ) , lower special item costs ( $ 115 million ) and other items ( $ 4 million ) .

Answer: 17%

Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: -5%

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2006 is $ 2074 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1622 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2004 is $ 1703 ;

in millions the discontinued operations of 2006 is -232 ( 232 ) ; the discontinued operations of 2005 is 416 ; the discontinued operations of 2004 is -273 ( 273 ) ;

in millions the net earnings ( loss ) of 2006 is $ 1050 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2005 is $ 1100 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2004 is $ -35 ( 35 ) ;

Answer: -5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17%.

Rejected response: 28%.

Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 17%

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2007 is $ 2423 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2006 is $ 2074 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1622 ;

industry segment operating profits of $ 2.4 billion were $ 349 million higher in 2007 than in 2006 due principally to the benefits from higher average price realizations ( $ 461 million ) , the net impact of cost reduction initiatives , improved operating perform- ance and a more favorable mix of products sold ( $ 304 million ) , higher sales volumes ( $ 17 million ) , lower special item costs ( $ 115 million ) and other items ( $ 4 million ) .

Answer: 17%

Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 28%

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2006 is $ 2074 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1622 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2004 is $ 1703 ;

in millions the discontinued operations of 2006 is -232 ( 232 ) ; the discontinued operations of 2005 is 416 ; the discontinued operations of 2004 is -273 ( 273 ) ;

in millions the net earnings ( loss ) of 2006 is $ 1050 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2005 is $ 1100 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2004 is $ -35 ( 35 ) ;

Answer: 28%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 28%.

Rejected response: -5%.

Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 28%

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2006 is $ 2074 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1622 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2004 is $ 1703 ;

in millions the discontinued operations of 2006 is -232 ( 232 ) ; the discontinued operations of 2005 is 416 ; the discontinued operations of 2004 is -273 ( 273 ) ;

in millions the net earnings ( loss ) of 2006 is $ 1050 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2005 is $ 1100 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2004 is $ -35 ( 35 ) ;

Answer: 28%

Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: -5%

Answer: -5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 28%.

Rejected response: 17%.

Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 28%

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2006 is $ 2074 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1622 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2004 is $ 1703 ;

in millions the discontinued operations of 2006 is -232 ( 232 ) ; the discontinued operations of 2005 is 416 ; the discontinued operations of 2004 is -273 ( 273 ) ;

in millions the net earnings ( loss ) of 2006 is $ 1050 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2005 is $ 1100 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2004 is $ -35 ( 35 ) ;

Answer: 28%

Question: what was the percentage change in industry segment operating profits from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 17%

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2007 is $ 2423 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2006 is $ 2074 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1622 ;

industry segment operating profits of $ 2.4 billion were $ 349 million higher in 2007 than in 2006 due principally to the benefits from higher average price realizations ( $ 461 million ) , the net impact of cost reduction initiatives , improved operating perform- ance and a more favorable mix of products sold ( $ 304 million ) , higher sales volumes ( $ 17 million ) , lower special item costs ( $ 115 million ) and other items ( $ 4 million ) .

Answer: 17%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the increase in industrial packaging sales between 2008 and 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1200.

Rejected response: 2445.

IP || what was the increase in industrial packaging sales <TIME>?

Question: what was the increase in industrial packaging sales between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: 1200

in millions the sales of 2009 is $ 8890 ; the sales of 2008 is $ 7690 ; the sales of 2007 is $ 5245 ;

industrial packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 .

industrial packaging results for 2009 and 2008 include the cbpr business acquired in the 2008 third quarter .

industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products .

Answer: 1200

Question: what was the increase in industrial packaging sales between 2007 and 2008?

Answer: 2445

Answer: 2445


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the increase in industrial packaging sales between 2007 and 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2445.

Rejected response: 1200.

Question: what was the increase in industrial packaging sales between 2007 and 2008?

Answer: 2445

industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products .

industrial packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 .

in millions the sales of 2009 is $ 8890 ; the sales of 2008 is $ 7690 ; the sales of 2007 is $ 5245 ;

Answer: 2445

Question: what was the increase in industrial packaging sales between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: 1200

Answer: 1200


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in net cash provided by operating activities between 2011 and 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -10%.

Rejected response: 1%.

INTC || what was the percentage change in net cash provided by operating activities <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in net cash provided by operating activities between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: -10%

( in millions ) the net cash provided by operating activities of 2013 is $ 20776 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2012 is $ 18884 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 20963 ;

operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities .

for 2012 compared to 2011 , the $ 2.1 billion decrease in cash provided by operating activities was due to lower net income and changes in our working capital , partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items .

in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows: .

( in millions ) the net cash used for investing activities of 2013 is -18073 ( 18073 ) ; the net cash used for investing activities of 2012 is -14060 ( 14060 ) ; the net cash used for investing activities of 2011 is -10301 ( 10301 ) ;

Answer: -10%

Question: what was the percentage change in net cash provided by operating activities between 2016 and 2017?

Answer: 1%

years ended ( in millions ) the net cash provided by operating activities of dec 292018 is $ 29432 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of dec 302017 is $ 22110 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of dec 312016 is $ 21808 ;

years ended ( in millions ) The net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 292018 is -18607 ( 18607 ) ; The net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 302017 is -8475 ( 8475 ) ; The net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 312016 is -5739 ( 5739 ) ;

years ended ( in millions ) The net cash used for investing activities of dec 292018 is -11239 ( 11239 ) ; The net cash used for investing activities of dec 302017 is -15762 ( 15762 ) ; The net cash used for investing activities of dec 312016 is -25817 ( 25817 ) ;

years ended ( in millions ) the net cash used for investing activities of dec 292018 is -11239 ( 11239 ) ; the net cash used for investing activities of dec 302017 is -15762 ( 15762 ) ; the net cash used for investing activities of dec 312016 is -25817 ( 25817 ) ;

years ended ( in millions ) the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 292018 is -18607 ( 18607 ) ; the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 302017 is -8475 ( 8475 ) ; the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 312016 is -5739 ( 5739 ) ;

Answer: 1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in net cash provided by operating activities between 2011 and 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -10%.

Rejected response: 10%.

Question: what was the percentage change in net cash provided by operating activities between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: -10%

in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows: .

( in millions ) the net cash provided by operating activities of 2013 is $ 20776 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2012 is $ 18884 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 20963 ;

( in millions ) the net cash used for investing activities of 2013 is -18073 ( 18073 ) ; the net cash used for investing activities of 2012 is -14060 ( 14060 ) ; the net cash used for investing activities of 2011 is -10301 ( 10301 ) ;

Answer: -10%

Question: what was the percentage change in net cash provided by operating activities between 2012 and 2013?

Answer: 10%

for 2013 compared to 2012 , the $ 1.9 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income in 2013 .

Answer: 10%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in net cash provided by operating activities between 2011 and 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -10%.

Rejected response: 15%.

Question: what was the percentage change in net cash provided by operating activities between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: -10%

in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows: .

( in millions ) the net cash provided by operating activities of 2013 is $ 20776 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2012 is $ 18884 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 20963 ;

( in millions ) the net cash used for investing activities of 2013 is -18073 ( 18073 ) ; the net cash used for investing activities of 2012 is -14060 ( 14060 ) ; the net cash used for investing activities of 2011 is -10301 ( 10301 ) ;

Answer: -10%

Question: what was the percentage change in net cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 15%

years ended ( in millions ) the net cash provided by operating activities of dec 302017 is $ 22110 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of dec 312016 is $ 21808 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of dec 262015 is $ 19018 ;

for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income .

operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities .

years ended ( in millions ) the net cash used for investing activities of dec 302017 is -15762 ( 15762 ) ; the net cash used for investing activities of dec 312016 is -25817 ( 25817 ) ; the net cash used for investing activities of dec 262015 is -8183 ( 8183 ) ;

years ended ( in millions ) the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 302017 is -8475 ( 8475 ) ; the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 312016 is -5739 ( 5739 ) ; the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities of dec 262015 is 1912 ;

Answer: 15%