Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3.8%.

Rejected response: -1.1%.

Question: what is the percentage change in weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -3.8%

note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2018 is 284.5 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2017 is 287.8 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2016 is 299.3 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2018 is 286.8 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2017 is 290.6 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2016 is 303.1 ;

Answer: -3.8%

Question: what is the percentage change in weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: -1.1%

Answer: -1.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3.8%.

Rejected response: -3.5%.

LMT || what is the percentage change in weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -3.8%

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2018 is 284.5 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2017 is 287.8 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2016 is 299.3 ;

The weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2018 is 286.8 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2017 is 290.6 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2016 is 303.1 ;

we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .

note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2018 is 286.8 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2017 is 290.6 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2016 is 303.1 ;

Answer: -3.8%

Question: what is the percentage change in weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -3.5%

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2016 is 299.3 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2015 is 310.3 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2014 is 316.8 ;

The weighted average common shares outstanding for dilutedcomputations of 2016 is 303.1 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for dilutedcomputations of 2015 is 314.7 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for dilutedcomputations of 2014 is 322.4 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding for dilutedcomputations of 2016 is 303.1 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for dilutedcomputations of 2015 is 314.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for dilutedcomputations of 2014 is 322.4 ;

Answer: -3.5%

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total consolidated revenues was gfs segment in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 45%.

Rejected response: 46%.

FIS || what percentage of total consolidated revenues was gfs segment <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total consolidated revenues was gfs segment in 2017?

Answer: 45%

the gfs of 2017 is 4138 ; the gfs of 2016 is 4250 ; the gfs of 2015 is 2361 ;

the total consolidated revenues of 2017 is $ 9123 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2016 is $ 9241 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2015 is $ 6596 ;

revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : .

the ifs of 2017 is $ 4630 ; the ifs of 2016 is $ 4525 ; the ifs of 2015 is $ 3809 ;

Answer: 45%

Question: what percentage of total consolidated revenues was gfs segment in 2016?

Answer: 46%

Answer: 46%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total consolidated revenues was gfs segment in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 46%.

Rejected response: 45%.

Question: what percentage of total consolidated revenues was gfs segment in 2016?

Answer: 46%

the ifs of 2017 is $ 4630 ; the ifs of 2016 is $ 4525 ; the ifs of 2015 is $ 3809 ;

the gfs of 2017 is 4138 ; the gfs of 2016 is 4250 ; the gfs of 2015 is 2361 ;

the total consolidated revenues of 2017 is $ 9123 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2016 is $ 9241 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2015 is $ 6596 ;

Answer: 46%

Question: what percentage of total consolidated revenues was gfs segment in 2017?

Answer: 45%

Answer: 45%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2003 for entergy corporation?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 0.1%.

Rejected response: 0.7%.

ETR || what is the growth rate in net revenue <TIME> for entergy corporation?

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2003 for entergy corporation?

Answer: 0.1%

the 2002 net revenue of ( in millions ) is $ 4209.6 ;

the 2003 net revenue of ( in millions ) is $ 4214.5 ;

base rates increased net revenue due to base rate increases at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans that became effective in january 2003 and june 2003 , respectively .

the net wholesale revenue of ( in millions ) is 23.2 ;

Answer: 0.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2004 for entergy corporation?

Answer: 0.7%

the 2004 net revenue of ( in millions ) is $ 4244.0 ;

entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .

following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

Answer: 0.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2004 for entergy corporation?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 0.7%.

Rejected response: 0.1%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2004 for entergy corporation?

Answer: 0.7%

following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

the 2003 net revenue of ( in millions ) is $ 4214.5 ;

the 2004 net revenue of ( in millions ) is $ 4244.0 ;

Answer: 0.7%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2003 for entergy corporation?

Answer: 0.1%

the 2002 net revenue of ( in millions ) is $ 4209.6 ;

the net wholesale revenue of ( in millions ) is 23.2 ;

Answer: 0.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the estimated effective tax rate applied for share-based compensation expense in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 32.1%.

Rejected response: 32.8%.

GPN || what is the estimated effective tax rate applied for share-based compensation expense <TIME>?

Question: what is the estimated effective tax rate applied for share-based compensation expense in 2016?

Answer: 32.1%

the share-based compensation expense of 2016 is $ 30809 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2015 ( in thousands ) is $ 21056 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2014 is $ 29793 ;

the income tax benefit of 2016 is $ 9879 ; the income tax benefit of 2015 ( in thousands ) is $ 6907 ; the income tax benefit of 2014 is $ 7126 ;

the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for our share-based awards and stock options ( in thousands ) : 2016 2015 2014 ( in thousands ) .

Answer: 32.1%

Question: what is the estimated effective tax rate applied for share-based compensation expense in 2015?

Answer: 32.8%

Answer: 32.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the estimated effective tax rate applied for share-based compensation expense in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 32.8%.

Rejected response: 32.1%.

Question: what is the estimated effective tax rate applied for share-based compensation expense in 2015?

Answer: 32.8%

the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for our share-based awards and stock options ( in thousands ) : 2016 2015 2014 ( in thousands ) .

the share-based compensation expense of 2016 is $ 30809 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2015 ( in thousands ) is $ 21056 ; the share-based compensation expense of 2014 is $ 29793 ;

the income tax benefit of 2016 is $ 9879 ; the income tax benefit of 2015 ( in thousands ) is $ 6907 ; the income tax benefit of 2014 is $ 7126 ;

Answer: 32.8%

Question: what is the estimated effective tax rate applied for share-based compensation expense in 2016?

Answer: 32.1%

Answer: 32.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2015 and the closing price on february 19 , 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-02-19 00:00:00 to 2016-02-20 00:00:00

Chosen response: -16.1%.

Rejected response: -17.4%.

AMT || what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , <TIME> and the closing price <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2015 and the closing price on february 19 , 2016?

Answer: -16.1%

2015 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 104.12 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 87.23 ;

on february 19 , 2016 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 87.32 per share as reported on the nyse .

2015 The quarter ended december 31 of high is 106.31 ; The quarter ended december 31 of low is 90.20 ;

2015 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 106.31 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 90.20 ;

Answer: -16.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 and the closing price on february 29 , 2008?

Answer: -17.4%

2007 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 46.53 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 40.08 ;

on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse .

2007 The quarter ended december 31 of high is 38.74 ; The quarter ended december 31 of low is 35.21 ;

2007 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 38.74 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 35.21 ;

Answer: -17.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2015 and the closing price on february 19 , 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-02-19 00:00:00 to 2016-02-20 00:00:00

Chosen response: -16.1%.

Rejected response: 4.2%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2015 and the closing price on february 19 , 2016?

Answer: -16.1%

2015 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 104.12 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 87.23 ;

2015 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 106.31 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 90.20 ;

on february 19 , 2016 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 87.32 per share as reported on the nyse .

Answer: -16.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2006 and the closing price on february 22 , 2007?

Answer: 4.2%

2006 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 38.74 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 35.21 ;

on february 22 , 2007 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 40.38 per share as reported on the nyse .

2006 The quarter ended december 31 of high is 28.33 ; The quarter ended december 31 of low is 22.73 ;

2006 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 28.33 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 22.73 ;

Answer: 4.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 and the closing price on february 29 , 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-02-29 00:00:00 to 2008-03-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -17.4%.

Rejected response: -16.1%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 and the closing price on february 29 , 2008?

Answer: -17.4%

2007 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 46.53 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 40.08 ;

2007 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 38.74 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 35.21 ;

on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse .

Answer: -17.4%

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2015 and the closing price on february 19 , 2016?

Answer: -16.1%

2015 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 104.12 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 87.23 ;

2015 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 106.31 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 90.20 ;

on february 19 , 2016 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 87.32 per share as reported on the nyse .

Answer: -16.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 and the closing price on february 29 , 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-02-29 00:00:00 to 2008-03-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -17.4%.

Rejected response: 4.2%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 and the closing price on february 29 , 2008?

Answer: -17.4%

2007 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 46.53 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 40.08 ;

2007 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 38.74 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 35.21 ;

on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse .

Answer: -17.4%

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2006 and the closing price on february 22 , 2007?

Answer: 4.2%

2006 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 38.74 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 35.21 ;

2006 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 28.33 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 22.73 ;

on february 22 , 2007 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 40.38 per share as reported on the nyse .

Answer: 4.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2006 and the closing price on february 22 , 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-02-22 00:00:00 to 2007-02-23 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.2%.

Rejected response: -16.1%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2006 and the closing price on february 22 , 2007?

Answer: 4.2%

2006 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 38.74 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 35.21 ;

2006 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 28.33 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 22.73 ;

on february 22 , 2007 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 40.38 per share as reported on the nyse .

Answer: 4.2%

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2015 and the closing price on february 19 , 2016?

Answer: -16.1%

2015 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 104.12 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 87.23 ;

2015 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 106.31 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 90.20 ;

on february 19 , 2016 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 87.32 per share as reported on the nyse .

Answer: -16.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2006 and the closing price on february 22 , 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-02-22 00:00:00 to 2007-02-23 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.2%.

Rejected response: -17.4%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2006 and the closing price on february 22 , 2007?

Answer: 4.2%

2006 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 38.74 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 35.21 ;

2006 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 28.33 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 22.73 ;

on february 22 , 2007 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 40.38 per share as reported on the nyse .

Answer: 4.2%

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 and the closing price on february 29 , 2008?

Answer: -17.4%

2007 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 46.53 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 40.08 ;

2007 the quarter ended december 31 of high is 38.74 ; the quarter ended december 31 of low is 35.21 ;

on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse .

Answer: -17.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3%.

Rejected response: -4%.

ZBH || what was the percentage change in weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -3%

the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2008 is 228.3 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2007 is 237.5 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2006 is 245.4 ;

The weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2008 is 227.3 ; The weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2007 is 235.5 ; The weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2006 is 243.0 ;

weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share 227.3 235.5 243.0 effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards 1.0 2.0 2.4 weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share 228.3 237.5 245.4 for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , an average of 11.2 million options to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of the common stock .

the following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares for the basic and diluted share computations for the years ending december 31 ( in millions ) : .

the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2008 is 227.3 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2007 is 235.5 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2006 is 243.0 ;

Answer: -3%

Question: what was the percentage change in weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -4%

Answer: -4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -4%.

Rejected response: -3%.

Question: what was the percentage change in weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -4%

the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2008 is 227.3 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2007 is 235.5 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2006 is 243.0 ;

the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2008 is 228.3 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2007 is 237.5 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2006 is 245.4 ;

weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share 227.3 235.5 243.0 effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards 1.0 2.0 2.4 weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share 228.3 237.5 245.4 for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , an average of 11.2 million options to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of the common stock .

Answer: -4%

Question: what was the percentage change in weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -3%

the following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares for the basic and diluted share computations for the years ending december 31 ( in millions ) : .

Answer: -3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the risk-free interest rate from 2004 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 38.7%.

Rejected response: 9.8%.

STT || what is the growth rate in the risk-free interest rate <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in the risk-free interest rate from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 38.7%

the risk-free interest rate of 2006 is 4.60 ; the risk-free interest rate of 2005 is 4.19 ; the risk-free interest rate of 2004 is 3.02 ;

the related total income tax benefit recorded in our consolidated statement of income was $ 83 million , $ 44 million and $ 30 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .

The expected volatility of 2006 is 26.50 ; The expected volatility of 2005 is 28.70 ; The expected volatility of 2004 is 27.10 ;

for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we realized net gains of $ 26 million on sales of available-for- sale securities .

the dividend yield of 2006 is 1.41% ( 1.41 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2005 is 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2004 is 1.35% ( 1.35 % ) ;

Answer: 38.7%

Question: what is the growth rate in the risk-free interest rate from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 9.8%

as of december 31 , 2006 , 106045 awards have been made under the 2006 plan .

as of december 31 , 2006 , 1305420 shares from the 1997 plan have been added to and may be awarded from the 2006 plan .

Answer: 9.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the risk-free interest rate from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9.8%.

Rejected response: 38.7%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the risk-free interest rate from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 9.8%

for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we realized net gains of $ 26 million on sales of available-for- sale securities .

the dividend yield of 2006 is 1.41% ( 1.41 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2005 is 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) ; the dividend yield of 2004 is 1.35% ( 1.35 % ) ;

the risk-free interest rate of 2006 is 4.60 ; the risk-free interest rate of 2005 is 4.19 ; the risk-free interest rate of 2004 is 3.02 ;

Answer: 9.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in the risk-free interest rate from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 38.7%

Answer: 38.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for international operations in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -7.3.

Rejected response: 17.2%.

AON || what is the difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for international operations <TIME>?

Question: what is the difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for international operations in 2018?

Answer: -7.3

years ended december 31 the statutory tax rate of 2018 is 19.0% ( 19.0 % ) ; the statutory tax rate of 2017 is 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) ; the statutory tax rate of 2016 is 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) ;

years ended december 31 the effective tax rate of 2018 is 11.7% ( 11.7 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2017 is 36.5% ( 36.5 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2016 is 10.6% ( 10.6 % ) ;

( 1 ) the company determines the adjustment for taxes on international operations based on the difference between the statutory tax rate applicable to earnings in each foreign jurisdiction and the enacted rate of 19.0% ( 19.0 % ) , 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) and 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) at december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively .

years ended december 31 the taxes on international operations ( 1 ) of 2018 is -7.3 ( 7.3 ) ; the taxes on international operations ( 1 ) of 2017 is -30.3 ( 30.3 ) ; the taxes on international operations ( 1 ) of 2016 is -12.2 ( 12.2 ) ;

Answer: -7.3

Question: what is the difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for international operations in 2018?

Answer: 17.2%

Answer: 17.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for international operations in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17.2%.

Rejected response: -7.3.

Question: what is the difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for international operations in 2018?

Answer: 17.2%

years ended december 31 the statutory tax rate of 2018 is 19.0% ( 19.0 % ) ; the statutory tax rate of 2017 is 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) ; the statutory tax rate of 2016 is 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) ;

years ended december 31 the taxes on international operations ( 1 ) of 2018 is -7.3 ( 7.3 ) ; the taxes on international operations ( 1 ) of 2017 is -30.3 ( 30.3 ) ; the taxes on international operations ( 1 ) of 2016 is -12.2 ( 12.2 ) ;

years ended december 31 the effective tax rate of 2018 is 11.7% ( 11.7 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2017 is 36.5% ( 36.5 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2016 is 10.6% ( 10.6 % ) ;

Answer: 17.2%

Question: what is the difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for international operations in 2018?

Answer: -7.3

Answer: -7.3


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for uncollectible accounts from year end 2003 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -24%.

Rejected response: -26%.

CNC || what was the percentage change in the allowance for uncollectible accounts from year end <TIME> to <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for uncollectible accounts from year end 2003 to 2004?

Answer: -24%

the allowances end of year of 2005 is $ 343 ; the allowances end of year of 2004 is $ 462 ; the allowances end of year of 2003 is $ 607 ;

activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31 is summarized below: .

The allowances beginning of year of 2005 is $ 462 ; The allowances beginning of year of 2004 is $ 607 ; The allowances beginning of year of 2003 is $ 219 ;

the allowances beginning of year of 2005 is $ 462 ; the allowances beginning of year of 2004 is $ 607 ; the allowances beginning of year of 2003 is $ 219 ;

reinsurance expenses were approximately $ 4105 , $ 6724 , and $ 6185 in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively .

Answer: -24%

Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for uncollectible accounts from year end 2004 to 2005?

Answer: -26%

revenues due to the company are recorded as premium and related receivables and recorded net of an allowance for uncol- lectible accounts based on historical trends and management 2019s judgment on the collectibility of these accounts .

Answer: -26%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for uncollectible accounts from year end 2004 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -26%.

Rejected response: -24%.

Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for uncollectible accounts from year end 2004 to 2005?

Answer: -26%

activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31 is summarized below: .

the allowances beginning of year of 2005 is $ 462 ; the allowances beginning of year of 2004 is $ 607 ; the allowances beginning of year of 2003 is $ 219 ;

the allowances end of year of 2005 is $ 343 ; the allowances end of year of 2004 is $ 462 ; the allowances end of year of 2003 is $ 607 ;

Answer: -26%

Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for uncollectible accounts from year end 2003 to 2004?

Answer: -24%

reinsurance expenses were approximately $ 4105 , $ 6724 , and $ 6185 in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively .

Answer: -24%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the net change in the valuation allowance in thousands between 2014 and 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3376.

Rejected response: 61.

GPN || what was the net change in the valuation allowance in thousands <TIME>?

Question: what was the net change in the valuation allowance in thousands between 2014 and 2015?

Answer: 3376

changes to our valuation allowance during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , the 2016 fiscal transition period and the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 are summarized below ( in thousands ) : .

balance at may 31 2014 The rate change on domestic net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards of $ -7199 ( 7199 ) is 3868 ;

balance at may 31 2014 the other of $ -7199 ( 7199 ) is 98 ;

Answer: 3376

Question: what was the net change in the valuation allowance in thousands between 2016 and 2017?

Answer: 61

Answer: 61


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the net change in the valuation allowance in thousands between 2016 and 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 61.

Rejected response: 3376.

Question: what was the net change in the valuation allowance in thousands between 2016 and 2017?

Answer: 61

Answer: 61

Question: what was the net change in the valuation allowance in thousands between 2014 and 2015?

Answer: 3376

balance at may 31 2014 the other of $ -7199 ( 7199 ) is 98 ;

Answer: 3376


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: non cash items represent what percent of cash from operations in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12%.

Rejected response: 63%.

MAR || non cash items represent what percent of cash from operations <TIME>?

Question: non cash items represent what percent of cash from operations in 2018?

Answer: 12%

( $ in millions ) the cash from operations of 2018 is $ 2357 ; the cash from operations of 2017 is $ 2227 ; the cash from operations of 2016 is $ 1619 ;

( $ in millions ) the non-cash items ( 1 ) of 2018 is 287 ; the non-cash items ( 1 ) of 2017 is 1397 ; the non-cash items ( 1 ) of 2016 is 514 ;

cash from operations cash from operations and non-cash items for the last three fiscal years are as follows: .

Answer: 12%

Question: non cash items represent what percent of cash from operations in 2017?

Answer: 63%

Answer: 63%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: non cash items represent what percent of cash from operations in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 63%.

Rejected response: 12%.

Question: non cash items represent what percent of cash from operations in 2017?

Answer: 63%

cash from operations cash from operations and non-cash items for the last three fiscal years are as follows: .

( $ in millions ) the cash from operations of 2018 is $ 2357 ; the cash from operations of 2017 is $ 2227 ; the cash from operations of 2016 is $ 1619 ;

( $ in millions ) the non-cash items ( 1 ) of 2018 is 287 ; the non-cash items ( 1 ) of 2017 is 1397 ; the non-cash items ( 1 ) of 2016 is 514 ;

Answer: 63%

Question: non cash items represent what percent of cash from operations in 2018?

Answer: 12%

Answer: 12%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction as a percentage of allowance for other funds used during construction during 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 61.5%.

Rejected response: 66.7%.

AWK || what was the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction as a percentage of allowance for other funds used during construction <TIME>?

Question: what was the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction as a percentage of allowance for other funds used during construction during 2015?

Answer: 61.5%

the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction of 2015 is 8 ; the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction of 2014 is 6 ; the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction of 2013 is 6 ;

the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2015 is $ 13 ; the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2014 is $ 9 ; the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2013 is $ 13 ;

allowance for funds used during construction afudc is a non-cash credit to income with a corresponding charge to utility plant that represents the cost of borrowed funds or a return on equity funds devoted to plant under construction .

afudc is summarized in the following table for the years ended december 31: .

Answer: 61.5%

Question: what was the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction as a percentage of allowance for other funds used during construction during 2014?

Answer: 66.7%

Answer: 66.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction as a percentage of allowance for other funds used during construction during 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 66.7%.

Rejected response: 61.5%.

Question: what was the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction as a percentage of allowance for other funds used during construction during 2014?

Answer: 66.7%

afudc is summarized in the following table for the years ended december 31: .

the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2015 is $ 13 ; the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2014 is $ 9 ; the allowance for other funds used during construction of 2013 is $ 13 ;

the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction of 2015 is 8 ; the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction of 2014 is 6 ; the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction of 2013 is 6 ;

Answer: 66.7%

Question: what was the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction as a percentage of allowance for other funds used during construction during 2015?

Answer: 61.5%

Answer: 61.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net income reported in 2004 , ( in millions ) ?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2116.25.

Rejected response: 2757.2.

HIG || what is the net income reported <TIME> , ( in millions ) ?

Question: what is the net income reported in 2004 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 2116.25

the basic earnings ( loss ) per share of 2004 is $ 7.24 ; the basic earnings ( loss ) per share of 2003 is $ -0.33 ( 0.33 ) ; the basic earnings ( loss ) per share of 2002 is $ 4.01 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutivepotential common shares ( diluted ) [1] of 2004 is 297.0 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutivepotential common shares ( diluted ) [1] of 2003 is 272.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutivepotential common shares ( diluted ) [1] of 2002 is 251.8 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2004 is 292.3 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2003 is 272.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2002 is 249.4 ;

Answer: 2116.25

Question: what is the net income reported in 2008 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 2757.2

the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2008 is $ -8.99 ( 8.99 ) ; the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2007 is $ 9.32 ; the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2006 is $ 8.89 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2008 is 306.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2007 is 319.1 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2006 is 315.9 ;

actual results are likely to differ , and in the past have differed , materially from those forecast by the company , depending on the outcome of various factors , including , but not limited to , those set forth in each 201coutlook 201d section and in item 1a , risk factors .

Answer: 2757.2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net income reported in 2004 , ( in millions ) ?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2116.25.

Rejected response: 2947.9.

Question: what is the net income reported in 2004 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 2116.25

the basic earnings ( loss ) per share of 2004 is $ 7.24 ; the basic earnings ( loss ) per share of 2003 is $ -0.33 ( 0.33 ) ; the basic earnings ( loss ) per share of 2002 is $ 4.01 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2004 is 292.3 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2003 is 272.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2002 is 249.4 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutivepotential common shares ( diluted ) [1] of 2004 is 297.0 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutivepotential common shares ( diluted ) [1] of 2003 is 272.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutivepotential common shares ( diluted ) [1] of 2002 is 251.8 ;

Answer: 2116.25

Question: what is the net income reported in 2007 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 2947.9

the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2008 is 306.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2007 is 316.3 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2006 is 308.8 ;

actual results are likely to differ , and in the past have differed , materially from those forecast by the company , depending on the outcome of various factors , including , but not limited to , those set forth in each 201coutlook 201d section and in item 1a , risk factors .

the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2008 is $ -8.99 ( 8.99 ) ; the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2007 is $ 9.32 ; the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2006 is $ 8.89 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2008 is 306.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2007 is 319.1 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2006 is 315.9 ;

Answer: 2947.9


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net income reported in 2008 , ( in millions ) ?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2757.2.

Rejected response: 2116.25.

Question: what is the net income reported in 2008 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 2757.2

actual results are likely to differ , and in the past have differed , materially from those forecast by the company , depending on the outcome of various factors , including , but not limited to , those set forth in each 201coutlook 201d section and in item 1a , risk factors .

the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2008 is $ -8.99 ( 8.99 ) ; the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2007 is $ 9.32 ; the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2006 is $ 8.89 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2008 is 306.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2007 is 319.1 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2006 is 315.9 ;

Answer: 2757.2

Question: what is the net income reported in 2004 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 2116.25

the basic earnings ( loss ) per share of 2004 is $ 7.24 ; the basic earnings ( loss ) per share of 2003 is $ -0.33 ( 0.33 ) ; the basic earnings ( loss ) per share of 2002 is $ 4.01 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2004 is 292.3 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2003 is 272.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2002 is 249.4 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutivepotential common shares ( diluted ) [1] of 2004 is 297.0 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutivepotential common shares ( diluted ) [1] of 2003 is 272.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutivepotential common shares ( diluted ) [1] of 2002 is 251.8 ;

Answer: 2116.25


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net income reported in 2008 , ( in millions ) ?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2757.2.

Rejected response: 2947.9.

Question: what is the net income reported in 2008 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 2757.2

actual results are likely to differ , and in the past have differed , materially from those forecast by the company , depending on the outcome of various factors , including , but not limited to , those set forth in each 201coutlook 201d section and in item 1a , risk factors .

the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2008 is $ -8.99 ( 8.99 ) ; the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2007 is $ 9.32 ; the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2006 is $ 8.89 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2008 is 306.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2007 is 319.1 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2006 is 315.9 ;

Answer: 2757.2

Question: what is the net income reported in 2007 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 2947.9

the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2008 is 306.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2007 is 316.3 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2006 is 308.8 ;

Answer: 2947.9


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net income reported in 2007 , ( in millions ) ?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2947.9.

Rejected response: 2116.25.

Question: what is the net income reported in 2007 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 2947.9

actual results are likely to differ , and in the past have differed , materially from those forecast by the company , depending on the outcome of various factors , including , but not limited to , those set forth in each 201coutlook 201d section and in item 1a , risk factors .

the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2008 is $ -8.99 ( 8.99 ) ; the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2007 is $ 9.32 ; the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2006 is $ 8.89 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2008 is 306.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2007 is 316.3 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2006 is 308.8 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2008 is 306.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2007 is 319.1 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2006 is 315.9 ;

Answer: 2947.9

Question: what is the net income reported in 2004 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 2116.25

the basic earnings ( loss ) per share of 2004 is $ 7.24 ; the basic earnings ( loss ) per share of 2003 is $ -0.33 ( 0.33 ) ; the basic earnings ( loss ) per share of 2002 is $ 4.01 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2004 is 292.3 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2003 is 272.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2002 is 249.4 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutivepotential common shares ( diluted ) [1] of 2004 is 297.0 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutivepotential common shares ( diluted ) [1] of 2003 is 272.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutivepotential common shares ( diluted ) [1] of 2002 is 251.8 ;

Answer: 2116.25


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net income reported in 2007 , ( in millions ) ?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2947.9.

Rejected response: 2757.2.

Question: what is the net income reported in 2007 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 2947.9

actual results are likely to differ , and in the past have differed , materially from those forecast by the company , depending on the outcome of various factors , including , but not limited to , those set forth in each 201coutlook 201d section and in item 1a , risk factors .

the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2008 is $ -8.99 ( 8.99 ) ; the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2007 is $ 9.32 ; the basic earnings ( losses ) per share of 2006 is $ 8.89 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2008 is 306.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2007 is 316.3 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic ) of 2006 is 308.8 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2008 is 306.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2007 is 319.1 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) of 2006 is 315.9 ;

Answer: 2947.9

Question: what is the net income reported in 2008 , ( in millions ) ?

Answer: 2757.2

Answer: 2757.2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net sales where comprised of food and ingredients in 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 26%.

Rejected response: 28%.

CAG || what percentage of total net sales where comprised of food and ingredients <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total net sales where comprised of food and ingredients in 2005?

Answer: 26%

reporting segment the food and ingredients of fiscal 2006 net sales is 3189 ; the food and ingredients of fiscal 2005 net sales is 2986 ; the food and ingredients of % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) is 7% ( 7 % ) ;

reporting segment the total of fiscal 2006 net sales is $ 11482 ; the total of fiscal 2005 net sales is $ 11384 ; the total of % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) is 1% ( 1 % ) ;

2005 net sales ( $ in millions ) reporting segment fiscal 2006 net sales fiscal 2005 net sales % (  % ) increase/ ( decrease ) .

reporting segment the consumer foods of fiscal 2006 net sales is $ 6504 ; the consumer foods of fiscal 2005 net sales is $ 6598 ; the consumer foods of % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) is ( 1 ) % ( % ) ;

Answer: 26%

Question: what percentage of total net sales where comprised of food and ingredients in 2006?

Answer: 28%

Answer: 28%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net sales where comprised of food and ingredients in 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 28%.

Rejected response: 26%.

Question: what percentage of total net sales where comprised of food and ingredients in 2006?

Answer: 28%

reporting segment the consumer foods of fiscal 2006 net sales is $ 6504 ; the consumer foods of fiscal 2005 net sales is $ 6598 ; the consumer foods of % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) is ( 1 ) % ( % ) ;

reporting segment the food and ingredients of fiscal 2006 net sales is 3189 ; the food and ingredients of fiscal 2005 net sales is 2986 ; the food and ingredients of % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) is 7% ( 7 % ) ;

reporting segment the total of fiscal 2006 net sales is $ 11482 ; the total of fiscal 2005 net sales is $ 11384 ; the total of % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) is 1% ( 1 % ) ;

Answer: 28%

Question: what percentage of total net sales where comprised of food and ingredients in 2005?

Answer: 26%

Answer: 26%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in revenues for investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method between 2000 and 2001?
Reference time interval: 2000-01-01 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2%.

Rejected response: -54%.

AES || what was the percentage change in revenues for investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in revenues for investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method between 2000 and 2001?

Answer: -2%

as of and for the years ended december 31 , the revenues of 2002 is $ 2832 ; the revenues of 2001 is $ 6147 ; the revenues of 2000 is $ 6241 ;

the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. .

the company recorded $ 83 million , $ 210 million , and $ 64 million of pre-tax non-cash foreign currency transaction losses on its investments in brazilian equity method affiliates during 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively. .

as of and for the years ended december 31, the stockholder's equity of 2002 is 3081 ; the stockholder's equity of 2001 is 6835 ; the stockholder's equity of 2000 is 6206 ;

Answer: -2%

Question: what was the percentage change in revenues for investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method between 2001 and 2002?

Answer: -54%

Answer: -54%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in revenues for investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method between 2001 and 2002?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2003-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -54%.

Rejected response: -2%.

Question: what was the percentage change in revenues for investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method between 2001 and 2002?

Answer: -54%

the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. .

as of and for the years ended december 31 , the revenues of 2002 is $ 2832 ; the revenues of 2001 is $ 6147 ; the revenues of 2000 is $ 6241 ;

as of and for the years ended december 31, the stockholder's equity of 2002 is 3081 ; the stockholder's equity of 2001 is 6835 ; the stockholder's equity of 2000 is 6206 ;

Answer: -54%

Question: what was the percentage change in revenues for investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method between 2000 and 2001?

Answer: -2%

Answer: -2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what were total mainline operating expenses in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 31381.

Rejected response: 31903.

AAL || what were total mainline operating expenses <TIME>?

Question: what were total mainline operating expenses in 2013?

Answer: 31381

year the 2013 ( a ) of gallons is 3608 ; the 2013 ( a ) of average price per gallon is 3.08 ; the 2013 ( a ) of aircraft fuel expense is 11109 ; the 2013 ( a ) of percent of total mainline operating expenses is 35.4 ;

year gallons average price per gallon aircraft fuel expense percent of total mainline operating expenses .

year The 2012 ( a ) of gallons is 3512 ; The 2012 ( a ) of average price per gallon is 3.19 ; The 2012 ( a ) of aircraft fuel expense is 11194 ; The 2012 ( a ) of percent of total mainline operating expenses is 35.8 ;

year the 2014 of gallons is 3644 ; the 2014 of average price per gallon is $ 2.91 ; the 2014 of aircraft fuel expense is $ 10592 ; the 2014 of percent of total mainline operating expenses is 33.2% ( 33.2 % ) ;

year the 2012 ( a ) of gallons is 3512 ; the 2012 ( a ) of average price per gallon is 3.19 ; the 2012 ( a ) of aircraft fuel expense is 11194 ; the 2012 ( a ) of percent of total mainline operating expenses is 35.8 ;

Answer: 31381

Question: what were total mainline operating expenses in 2014?

Answer: 31903

year The 2013 ( a ) of gallons is 3608 ; The 2013 ( a ) of average price per gallon is 3.08 ; The 2013 ( a ) of aircraft fuel expense is 11109 ; The 2013 ( a ) of percent of total mainline operating expenses is 35.4 ;

Answer: 31903


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what were total mainline operating expenses in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 31903.

Rejected response: 31381.

Question: what were total mainline operating expenses in 2014?

Answer: 31903

year the 2014 of gallons is 3644 ; the 2014 of average price per gallon is $ 2.91 ; the 2014 of aircraft fuel expense is $ 10592 ; the 2014 of percent of total mainline operating expenses is 33.2% ( 33.2 % ) ;

year the 2013 ( a ) of gallons is 3608 ; the 2013 ( a ) of average price per gallon is 3.08 ; the 2013 ( a ) of aircraft fuel expense is 11109 ; the 2013 ( a ) of percent of total mainline operating expenses is 35.4 ;

year the 2012 ( a ) of gallons is 3512 ; the 2012 ( a ) of average price per gallon is 3.19 ; the 2012 ( a ) of aircraft fuel expense is 11194 ; the 2012 ( a ) of percent of total mainline operating expenses is 35.8 ;

Answer: 31903

Question: what were total mainline operating expenses in 2013?

Answer: 31381

Answer: 31381


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what were total operating expenses in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 38316\\n.

Rejected response: 41932.

AAL || what were total operating expenses <TIME>?

Question: what were total operating expenses in 2017?

Answer: 38316\\n

year the 2017 of gallons is 4352 ; the 2017 of average priceper gallon is 1.73 ; the 2017 of aircraft fuelexpense is 7510 ; the 2017 of percent of totaloperating expenses is 19.6% ( 19.6 % ) ;

year gallons average price per gallon aircraft fuel expense percent of total operating expenses .

therefore , our quarterly results of operations are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire year , and historical operating results in a quarterly or annual period are not necessarily indicative of future operating results .

year the 2018 of gallons is 4447 ; the 2018 of average priceper gallon is $ 2.23 ; the 2018 of aircraft fuelexpense is $ 9896 ; the 2018 of percent of totaloperating expenses is 23.6% ( 23.6 % ) ;

year the 2016 of gallons is 4347 ; the 2016 of average priceper gallon is 1.42 ; the 2016 of aircraft fuelexpense is 6180 ; the 2016 of percent of totaloperating expenses is 17.6% ( 17.6 % ) ;

Answer: 38316\\n

Question: what were total operating expenses in 2018?

Answer: 41932

Answer: 41932


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what were total operating expenses in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 41932.

Rejected response: 38316\\n.

Question: what were total operating expenses in 2018?

Answer: 41932

year the 2018 of gallons is 4447 ; the 2018 of average priceper gallon is $ 2.23 ; the 2018 of aircraft fuelexpense is $ 9896 ; the 2018 of percent of totaloperating expenses is 23.6% ( 23.6 % ) ;

year the 2017 of gallons is 4352 ; the 2017 of average priceper gallon is 1.73 ; the 2017 of aircraft fuelexpense is 7510 ; the 2017 of percent of totaloperating expenses is 19.6% ( 19.6 % ) ;

year the 2016 of gallons is 4347 ; the 2016 of average priceper gallon is 1.42 ; the 2016 of aircraft fuelexpense is 6180 ; the 2016 of percent of totaloperating expenses is 17.6% ( 17.6 % ) ;

Answer: 41932

Question: what were total operating expenses in 2017?

Answer: 38316\\n

Answer: 38316\\n


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what are the total consolidated assets in 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 108288.9.

Rejected response: 141891.7.

STT || what are the total consolidated assets <TIME>?

Question: what are the total consolidated assets in 2006?

Answer: 108288.9

( in millions ) the total cross-border outstandings of 2007 is $ 17027 ; the total cross-border outstandings of 2006 is $ 9746 ; the total cross-border outstandings of 2005 is $ 10809 ;

the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .

cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31 : 2007 2006 2005 ( in millions ) .

aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) .

Answer: 108288.9

Question: what are the total consolidated assets in 2007?

Answer: 141891.7

( in millions ) the united kingdom of 2007 is $ 5951 ; the united kingdom of 2006 is $ 5531 ; the united kingdom of 2005 is $ 2696 ;

Answer: 141891.7


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what are the total consolidated assets in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 141891.7.

Rejected response: 108288.9.

Question: what are the total consolidated assets in 2007?

Answer: 141891.7

( in millions ) the united kingdom of 2007 is $ 5951 ; the united kingdom of 2006 is $ 5531 ; the united kingdom of 2005 is $ 2696 ;

( in millions ) the total cross-border outstandings of 2007 is $ 17027 ; the total cross-border outstandings of 2006 is $ 9746 ; the total cross-border outstandings of 2005 is $ 10809 ;

the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .

Answer: 141891.7

Question: what are the total consolidated assets in 2006?

Answer: 108288.9

aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) .

Answer: 108288.9


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the fair value per share between 2012 and 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -19%.

Rejected response: 5%.

EW || what is the percentage change in the fair value per share <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the fair value per share between 2012 and 2013?

Answer: -19%

the fair value per share of 2013 is $ 19.47 ; the fair value per share of 2012 is $ 23.93 ; the fair value per share of 2011 is $ 22.78 ;

the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .

upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 10000 shares .

the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .

the expected volatility of 2013 is 31% ( 31 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2012 is 31% ( 31 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2011 is 27% ( 27 % ) ;

Answer: -19%

Question: what is the percentage change in the fair value per share between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: 5%

Answer: 5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the fair value per share between 2011 and 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5%.

Rejected response: -19%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the fair value per share between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: 5%

the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .

the expected volatility of 2013 is 31% ( 31 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2012 is 31% ( 31 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2011 is 27% ( 27 % ) ;

the fair value per share of 2013 is $ 19.47 ; the fair value per share of 2012 is $ 23.93 ; the fair value per share of 2011 is $ 22.78 ;

Answer: 5%

Question: what is the percentage change in the fair value per share between 2012 and 2013?

Answer: -19%

Answer: -19%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments are due in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 31%.

Rejected response: 7%.

PKG || what percentage of total purchase commitments are due <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments are due in 2016?

Answer: 31%

total purchase commitments were as follows ( dollars in millions ) : .

purchase commitments in the table below , we set forth our enforceable and legally binding purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2015 .

the company purchased a total of $ 299.6 million , $ 265.9 million , and $ 61.7 million during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively , under these purchase agreements .

Answer: 31%

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments are due in 2016?

Answer: 7%

total purchase commitments are as follows ( dollars in thousands ) : .

2014 the thereafter of $ 120971 is 11536 ;

Answer: 7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments are due in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7%.

Rejected response: 31%.

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments are due in 2016?

Answer: 7%

2014 the thereafter of $ 120971 is 11536 ;

Answer: 7%

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments are due in 2016?

Answer: 31%

the company purchased a total of $ 299.6 million , $ 265.9 million , and $ 61.7 million during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively , under these purchase agreements .

Answer: 31%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what are the consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 141891.7.

Rejected response: 157600.

STT || what are the consolidated total assets as of december 31 , <TIME>?

Question: what are the consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007?

Answer: 141891.7

( in millions ) the total cross-border outstandings of 2008 is $ 7880 ; the total cross-border outstandings of 2007 is $ 17027 ; the total cross-border outstandings of 2006 is $ 9746 ;

the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 5% ( 5 % ) , 12% ( 12 % ) and 9% ( 9 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively .

there were no cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 .

cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31: .

Answer: 141891.7

Question: what are the consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2008?

Answer: 157600

Answer: 157600


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what are the consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 157600.

Rejected response: 141891.7.

Question: what are the consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2008?

Answer: 157600

cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31: .

( in millions ) the total cross-border outstandings of 2008 is $ 7880 ; the total cross-border outstandings of 2007 is $ 17027 ; the total cross-border outstandings of 2006 is $ 9746 ;

the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 5% ( 5 % ) , 12% ( 12 % ) and 9% ( 9 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively .

Answer: 157600

Question: what are the consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007?

Answer: 141891.7

Answer: 141891.7


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by how much did the effective tax rate decrease from 2002 to 2003?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5.5%.

Rejected response: -5.50%.

MRO || by how much did the effective tax rate decrease <TIME>?

Question: by how much did the effective tax rate decrease from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: -5.5%

the effective tax rate of 2003 is 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2002 is 42.1% ( 42.1 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2001 is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) ;

increased the effective tax rate 7.0 percent in 2002. .

the following is an analysis of the effective tax rate for the periods presented: .

the statutory tax rate of 2003 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory tax rate of 2002 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory tax rate of 2001 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ;

Answer: -5.5%

Question: by how much did the effective tax rate decrease from 2002 to 2004?

Answer: -5.50%

the effective tax rate of 2004 is 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2003 is 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2002 is 42.1% ( 42.1 % ) ;

increased the effective tax rate 7.0 percent in .

the decrease in 2004 is primarily due to an increase in interest income .

the statutory tax rate of 2004 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory tax rate of 2003 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory tax rate of 2002 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ;

Answer: -5.50%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by how much did the effective tax rate decrease from 2002 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5.50%.

Rejected response: -5.5%.

Question: by how much did the effective tax rate decrease from 2002 to 2004?

Answer: -5.50%

the following is an analysis of the effective tax rate for the periods presented: .

the statutory tax rate of 2004 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory tax rate of 2003 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory tax rate of 2002 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ;

the effective tax rate of 2004 is 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2003 is 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2002 is 42.1% ( 42.1 % ) ;

Answer: -5.50%

Question: by how much did the effective tax rate decrease from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: -5.5%

the statutory tax rate of 2003 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory tax rate of 2002 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory tax rate of 2001 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ;

the effective tax rate of 2003 is 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2002 is 42.1% ( 42.1 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2001 is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) ;

Answer: -5.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference in millions , between additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade at the end of december 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2078.

Rejected response: 966.

GS || what is the difference in millions , between additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade at the end of december <TIME>?

Question: what is the difference in millions , between additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade at the end of december 2013?

Answer: 2078

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is $ 911 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is $ 1534 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 2989 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ;

in millions 2013 2012 additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade $ 911 $ 1534 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2989 2500 cash flows as a global financial institution , our cash flows are complex and bear little relation to our net earnings and net assets .

cash flow analysis may , however , be helpful in highlighting certain macro trends and strategic initiatives in our businesses .

Answer: 2078

Question: what is the difference in millions , between additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade at the end of december 2012?

Answer: 966

Answer: 966


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference in millions , between additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade at the end of december 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 966.

Rejected response: 2078.

Question: what is the difference in millions , between additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade at the end of december 2012?

Answer: 966

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is $ 911 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is $ 1534 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 2989 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ;

cash flow analysis may , however , be helpful in highlighting certain macro trends and strategic initiatives in our businesses .

Answer: 966

Question: what is the difference in millions , between additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade at the end of december 2013?

Answer: 2078

Answer: 2078


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -51.3%.

Rejected response: 5.40%.

PM || what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , <TIME>?

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , 2017?

Answer: -51.3%

subtract(156.80, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(208.10, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)

date the december 31 2012 of pmi is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2012 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2012 of s&p 500 index is $ 100.00 ;

date the december 31 2013 of pmi is $ 108.50 ; the december 31 2013 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 122.80 ; the december 31 2013 of s&p 500 index is $ 132.40 ;

date the december 31 2014 of pmi is $ 106.20 ; the december 31 2014 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 132.50 ; the december 31 2014 of s&p 500 index is $ 150.50 ;

date the december 31 2015 of pmi is $ 120.40 ; the december 31 2015 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 143.50 ; the december 31 2015 of s&p 500 index is $ 152.60 ;

date the december 31 2016 of pmi is $ 130.80 ; the december 31 2016 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 145.60 ; the december 31 2016 of s&p 500 index is $ 170.80 ;

date the december 31 2017 of pmi is $ 156.80 ; the december 31 2017 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 172.70 ; the december 31 2017 of s&p 500 index is $ 208.10 ;

subtract(divide(subtract(156.80, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(208.10, const_100), const_100))

Answer: -51.3%

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , 2015?

Answer: 5.40%

subtract(186.20, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(180.80, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)

date the december 31 2010 of pmi is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2010 of pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2010 of s&p 500 index is $ 100.00 ;

date the december 31 2015 of pmi is $ 186.20 ; the december 31 2015 of pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) is $ 179.20 ; the december 31 2015 of s&p 500 index is $ 180.80 ;

performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index .

subtract(divide(subtract(186.20, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(180.80, const_100), const_100))

date the december 31 2012 of pmi is $ 154.60 ; the december 31 2012 of pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) is $ 128.00 ; the december 31 2012 of s&p 500 index is $ 118.50 ;

Answer: 5.40%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5.40%.

Rejected response: -51.3%.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , 2015?

Answer: 5.40%

subtract(186.20, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(180.80, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)

subtract(divide(subtract(186.20, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(180.80, const_100), const_100))

date the december 31 2010 of pmi is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2010 of pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2010 of s&p 500 index is $ 100.00 ;

date the december 31 2012 of pmi is $ 154.60 ; the december 31 2012 of pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) is $ 128.00 ; the december 31 2012 of s&p 500 index is $ 118.50 ;

date the december 31 2015 of pmi is $ 186.20 ; the december 31 2015 of pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) is $ 179.20 ; the december 31 2015 of s&p 500 index is $ 180.80 ;

Answer: 5.40%

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , 2017?

Answer: -51.3%

subtract(156.80, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(208.10, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)

subtract(divide(subtract(156.80, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(208.10, const_100), const_100))

date the december 31 2012 of pmi is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2012 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2012 of s&p 500 index is $ 100.00 ;

date the december 31 2013 of pmi is $ 108.50 ; the december 31 2013 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 122.80 ; the december 31 2013 of s&p 500 index is $ 132.40 ;

date the december 31 2014 of pmi is $ 106.20 ; the december 31 2014 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 132.50 ; the december 31 2014 of s&p 500 index is $ 150.50 ;

date the december 31 2015 of pmi is $ 120.40 ; the december 31 2015 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 143.50 ; the december 31 2015 of s&p 500 index is $ 152.60 ;

date the december 31 2016 of pmi is $ 130.80 ; the december 31 2016 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 145.60 ; the december 31 2016 of s&p 500 index is $ 170.80 ;

date the december 31 2017 of pmi is $ 156.80 ; the december 31 2017 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 172.70 ; the december 31 2017 of s&p 500 index is $ 208.10 ;

Answer: -51.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what will be the rate of return for global payments from 2002 to 2003?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5.8%.

Rejected response: 37.8%.

GPN || what will be the rate of return for global payments <TIME>?

Question: what will be the rate of return for global payments from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: -5.8%

subtract(94.20, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the may 31 2002 of global payments is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2002 of s&p 500 is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2002 of s&p information technology is $ 100.00 ;

the may 31 2003 of global payments is 94.20 ; the may 31 2003 of s&p 500 is 91.94 ; the may 31 2003 of s&p information technology is 94.48 ;

comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc .

Answer: -5.8%

Question: what will be the rate of return for global payments from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 37.8%

s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends .

the may 31 2004 of global payments is 129.77 ; the may 31 2004 of s&p 500 is 108.79 ; the may 31 2004 of s&p information technology is 115.24 ;

Answer: 37.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what will be the rate of return for global payments from 2003 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 37.8%.

Rejected response: -5.8%.

Question: what will be the rate of return for global payments from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 37.8%

comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc .

s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends .

the may 31 2003 of global payments is 94.20 ; the may 31 2003 of s&p 500 is 91.94 ; the may 31 2003 of s&p information technology is 94.48 ;

the may 31 2004 of global payments is 129.77 ; the may 31 2004 of s&p 500 is 108.79 ; the may 31 2004 of s&p information technology is 115.24 ;

Answer: 37.8%

Question: what will be the rate of return for global payments from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: -5.8%

subtract(94.20, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the may 31 2002 of global payments is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2002 of s&p 500 is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2002 of s&p information technology is $ 100.00 ;

Answer: -5.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 0.

Rejected response: 1.

HII || what is the liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , <TIME>?

Question: what is the liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2017?

Answer: 0

in 2017 , there was a net decrease in income tax expense of $ 1 million for interest and penalties , resulting in no material liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2017 .

in 2016 , there was a net decrease in income tax expense of $ 2 million for interest and penalties , resulting in a total liability of $ 1 million for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2016 .

and penalties , resulting in a liability of $ 1 million for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2018 .

Answer: 0

Question: what is the liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2016?

Answer: 1

Answer: 1


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.

Rejected response: 0.

Question: what is the liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2016?

Answer: 1

and penalties , resulting in a liability of $ 1 million for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2018 .

in 2017 , there was a net decrease in income tax expense of $ 1 million for interest and penalties , resulting in no material liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2017 .

in 2016 , there was a net decrease in income tax expense of $ 2 million for interest and penalties , resulting in a total liability of $ 1 million for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2016 .

Answer: 1

Question: what is the liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2017?

Answer: 0

Answer: 0


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 15.1%.

Rejected response: 2.3%.

ETR || what was the percent of the change in the net revenue <TIME>

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 15.1%

the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1043.7 ;

the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 886.2 ;

following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .

Answer: 15.1%

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2016 to 2017

Answer: 2.3%

the 2016 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 6179 ;

the 2017 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 6318 ;

net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .

Answer: 2.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 15.1%.

Rejected response: 2.9%.

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 15.1%

the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1043.7 ;

the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 886.2 ;

Answer: 15.1%

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue in 2011

Answer: 2.9%

the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1216.7 ;

the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1252.3 ;

following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .

the net wholesale revenue of amount ( in millions ) is -11.9 ( 11.9 ) ;

Answer: 2.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 15.1%.

Rejected response: 3.8%.

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 15.1%

the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1043.7 ;

the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 886.2 ;

Answer: 15.1%

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2013 to 2014

Answer: 3.8%

the 2013 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 5524 ;

the 2014 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 5735 ;

entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2014 to 2013 .

Answer: 3.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2016 to 2017
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.3%.

Rejected response: 15.1%.

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2016 to 2017

Answer: 2.3%

net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .

the 2016 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 6179 ;

the 2017 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 6318 ;

Answer: 2.3%

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 15.1%

the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1043.7 ;

the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 886.2 ;

Answer: 15.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2016 to 2017
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.3%.

Rejected response: 2.9%.

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2016 to 2017

Answer: 2.3%

net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .

the 2016 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 6179 ;

the 2017 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 6318 ;

Answer: 2.3%

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue in 2011

Answer: 2.9%

the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1216.7 ;

the net wholesale revenue of amount ( in millions ) is -11.9 ( 11.9 ) ;

the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1252.3 ;

Answer: 2.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2016 to 2017
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.3%.

Rejected response: 3.8%.

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2016 to 2017

Answer: 2.3%

net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .

the 2016 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 6179 ;

the 2017 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 6318 ;

Answer: 2.3%

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2013 to 2014

Answer: 3.8%

entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2014 to 2013 .

the 2013 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 5524 ;

the 2014 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 5735 ;

Answer: 3.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue in 2011
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.9%.

Rejected response: 15.1%.

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue in 2011

Answer: 2.9%

the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1216.7 ;

the net wholesale revenue of amount ( in millions ) is -11.9 ( 11.9 ) ;

the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1252.3 ;

Answer: 2.9%

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 15.1%

the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1043.7 ;

the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 886.2 ;

Answer: 15.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue in 2011
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.9%.

Rejected response: 2.3%.

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue in 2011

Answer: 2.9%

the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1216.7 ;

the net wholesale revenue of amount ( in millions ) is -11.9 ( 11.9 ) ;

the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1252.3 ;

Answer: 2.9%

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2016 to 2017

Answer: 2.3%

net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .

the 2016 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 6179 ;

the 2017 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 6318 ;

Answer: 2.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue in 2011
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.9%.

Rejected response: 3.8%.

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue in 2011

Answer: 2.9%

the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1216.7 ;

the net wholesale revenue of amount ( in millions ) is -11.9 ( 11.9 ) ;

the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1252.3 ;

Answer: 2.9%

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2013 to 2014

Answer: 3.8%

entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2014 to 2013 .

the 2013 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 5524 ;

the 2014 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 5735 ;

Answer: 3.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2013 to 2014
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.8%.

Rejected response: 15.1%.

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2013 to 2014

Answer: 3.8%

entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2014 to 2013 .

the 2013 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 5524 ;

the 2014 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 5735 ;

Answer: 3.8%

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 15.1%

the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1043.7 ;

the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 886.2 ;

Answer: 15.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2013 to 2014
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.8%.

Rejected response: 2.3%.

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2013 to 2014

Answer: 3.8%

entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2014 to 2013 .

the 2013 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 5524 ;

the 2014 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 5735 ;

Answer: 3.8%

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2016 to 2017

Answer: 2.3%

net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .

the 2016 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 6179 ;

the 2017 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 6318 ;

Answer: 2.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2013 to 2014
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.8%.

Rejected response: 2.9%.

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2013 to 2014

Answer: 3.8%

entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2014 to 2013 .

the 2013 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 5524 ;

the 2014 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 5735 ;

Answer: 3.8%

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue in 2011

Answer: 2.9%

the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1216.7 ;

the net wholesale revenue of amount ( in millions ) is -11.9 ( 11.9 ) ;

the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1252.3 ;

Answer: 2.9%