Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -6619.

Rejected response: -2106.

Question: what is the net change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -6619

the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances .

such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. .

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2015 is $ 22878 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 29497 ;

Answer: -6619

Question: what is the net change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables in 2013?

Answer: -2106

in addition , the company has reclassified the following amounts from 201cdistributions from other invested assets 201d included in cash flows from investing activities to 201cdistribution of limited partnership income 201d included in cash flows from operations for interim reporting periods of 2013 : $ 33686 thousand for the three months ended march 31 , 2013 ; $ 9409 thousand and $ 43095 thousand for the three months and six months ended june 30 , 2013 , respectively ; and $ 5638 thousand and $ 48733 thousand for the three months and nine months ended september 30 , 2013 , respectively .

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 29905 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 32011 ;

Answer: -2106


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -6619.

Rejected response: -408.

RE || what is the net change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -6619

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2015 is $ 22878 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 29497 ;

the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances .

fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale , at market value , reflect unrealized appreciation and depreciation , as a result of temporary changes in market value during the period , in shareholders 2019 equity , net of income taxes in 201caccumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) 201d in the consolidated balance sheets .

such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. .

Answer: -6619

Question: what is the net change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -408

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 29497 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 29905 ;

Answer: -408

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock for the five years ended december 31 , 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 56.80%.

Rejected response: 86.20%.

PM || what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock for the five years ended december 31 , <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock for the five years ended december 31 , 2017?

Answer: 56.80%

subtract(156.80, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

date the december 31 2012 of pmi is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2012 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2012 of s&p 500 index is $ 100.00 ;

date the december 31 2013 of pmi is $ 108.50 ; the december 31 2013 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 122.80 ; the december 31 2013 of s&p 500 index is $ 132.40 ;

date the december 31 2014 of pmi is $ 106.20 ; the december 31 2014 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 132.50 ; the december 31 2014 of s&p 500 index is $ 150.50 ;

date the december 31 2015 of pmi is $ 120.40 ; the december 31 2015 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 143.50 ; the december 31 2015 of s&p 500 index is $ 152.60 ;

date the december 31 2016 of pmi is $ 130.80 ; the december 31 2016 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 145.60 ; the december 31 2016 of s&p 500 index is $ 170.80 ;

date the december 31 2017 of pmi is $ 156.80 ; the december 31 2017 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 172.70 ; the december 31 2017 of s&p 500 index is $ 208.10 ;

Answer: 56.80%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock for the five years ended december 31 , 2015?

Answer: 86.20%

subtract(186.20, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

date the december 31 2010 of pmi is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2010 of pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2010 of s&p 500 index is $ 100.00 ;

date the december 31 2015 of pmi is $ 186.20 ; the december 31 2015 of pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) is $ 179.20 ; the december 31 2015 of s&p 500 index is $ 180.80 ;

performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index .

date the december 31 2012 of pmi is $ 154.60 ; the december 31 2012 of pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) is $ 128.00 ; the december 31 2012 of s&p 500 index is $ 118.50 ;

Answer: 86.20%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock for the five years ended december 31 , 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 86.20%.

Rejected response: 56.80%.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock for the five years ended december 31 , 2015?

Answer: 86.20%

subtract(186.20, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

date the december 31 2010 of pmi is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2010 of pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2010 of s&p 500 index is $ 100.00 ;

date the december 31 2012 of pmi is $ 154.60 ; the december 31 2012 of pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) is $ 128.00 ; the december 31 2012 of s&p 500 index is $ 118.50 ;

date the december 31 2015 of pmi is $ 186.20 ; the december 31 2015 of pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) is $ 179.20 ; the december 31 2015 of s&p 500 index is $ 180.80 ;

Answer: 86.20%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock for the five years ended december 31 , 2017?

Answer: 56.80%

subtract(156.80, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

date the december 31 2012 of pmi is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2012 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2012 of s&p 500 index is $ 100.00 ;

date the december 31 2013 of pmi is $ 108.50 ; the december 31 2013 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 122.80 ; the december 31 2013 of s&p 500 index is $ 132.40 ;

date the december 31 2014 of pmi is $ 106.20 ; the december 31 2014 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 132.50 ; the december 31 2014 of s&p 500 index is $ 150.50 ;

date the december 31 2015 of pmi is $ 120.40 ; the december 31 2015 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 143.50 ; the december 31 2015 of s&p 500 index is $ 152.60 ;

date the december 31 2016 of pmi is $ 130.80 ; the december 31 2016 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 145.60 ; the december 31 2016 of s&p 500 index is $ 170.80 ;

date the december 31 2017 of pmi is $ 156.80 ; the december 31 2017 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 172.70 ; the december 31 2017 of s&p 500 index is $ 208.10 ;

Answer: 56.80%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2005 what percentage of specialty businesses sales are from arizona chemical sales?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 76%.

Rejected response: 82%.

IP || <TIME> what percentage of specialty businesses sales are from arizona chemical sales?

Question: in 2005 what percentage of specialty businesses sales are from arizona chemical sales?

Answer: 76%

in millions the sales of 2006 is $ 935 ; the sales of 2005 is $ 915 ; the sales of 2004 is $ 1120 ;

arizona chemical sales were $ 769 million in 2006 , compared with $ 692 million in 2005 and $ 672 million in 2004 .

specialty businesses and other in millions 2006 2005 2004 .

specialty businesses and other the specialty businesses and other segment includes the results of the arizona chemical business and certain divested businesses whose results are included in this segment for periods prior to their sale or closure .

Answer: 76%

Question: in 2006 what percentage of specialty businesses sales are from arizona chemical sales?

Answer: 82%

Answer: 82%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2006 what percentage of specialty businesses sales are from arizona chemical sales?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 82%.

Rejected response: 76%.

Question: in 2006 what percentage of specialty businesses sales are from arizona chemical sales?

Answer: 82%

specialty businesses and other the specialty businesses and other segment includes the results of the arizona chemical business and certain divested businesses whose results are included in this segment for periods prior to their sale or closure .

in millions the sales of 2006 is $ 935 ; the sales of 2005 is $ 915 ; the sales of 2004 is $ 1120 ;

arizona chemical sales were $ 769 million in 2006 , compared with $ 692 million in 2005 and $ 672 million in 2004 .

Answer: 82%

Question: in 2005 what percentage of specialty businesses sales are from arizona chemical sales?

Answer: 76%

Answer: 76%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total rent expense from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12%.

Rejected response: 19%.

ZBH || what was the percentage change in total rent expense <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in total rent expense from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 12%

total rent expense for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 aggregated $ 41.4 million , $ 37.1 million and $ 31.1 million , respectively .

The total of 2008 is $ 275.1 ; The total of 2007 is $ 230.0 ; The total of 2006 is $ 197.4 ;

depreciation and amortization included in operating segment profit for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was as follows ( in millions ) : .

the total of 2008 is $ 275.1 ; the total of 2007 is $ 230.0 ; the total of 2006 is $ 197.4 ;

Answer: 12%

Question: what was the percentage change in total rent expense from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 19%

Answer: 19%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total rent expense from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 19%.

Rejected response: 12%.

Question: what was the percentage change in total rent expense from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 19%

depreciation and amortization included in operating segment profit for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was as follows ( in millions ) : .

the total of 2008 is $ 275.1 ; the total of 2007 is $ 230.0 ; the total of 2006 is $ 197.4 ;

total rent expense for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 aggregated $ 41.4 million , $ 37.1 million and $ 31.1 million , respectively .

Answer: 19%

Question: what was the percentage change in total rent expense from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 12%

Answer: 12%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the ratio of the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans for 2009 to 2008
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.15.

Rejected response: 1.31.

MA || what was the ratio of the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans <TIME> to <TIME>

Question: what was the ratio of the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans for 2009 to 2008

Answer: 1.15

the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 40627 , $ 35341 and $ 26996 for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

in addition , the company has several defined contribution plans outside of the united states .

beginning in 2008 , the discretionary profit sharing amount related to prior year company performance was paid directly to employees as a short-term cash incentive bonus rather than as a contribution to the savings plan .

in 2009 , the company recorded a $ 3944 benefit expense as a result of enhanced postretirement medical benefits under the postretirement plan provided to employees that chose to participate in a voluntary transition program. .

Answer: 1.15

Question: what was the ratio of the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans for 2008 to 2007

Answer: 1.31

Explanation: the ratio of the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans for 2008 to 2007 was 1.31 to 1

the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 35341 , $ 26996 and $ 43594 for 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively .

beginning in 2008 , the discretionary profit sharing amount related to 2007 company performance was paid directly to employees as a short-term cash incentive bonus rather than as a contribution to the savings plan .

the company 2019s liability related to the vap at december 31 , 2007 was $ 986 .

the expense ( benefit ) was $ ( 6 ) , $ ( 267 ) and $ 3406 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively .

Answer: 1.31


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the ratio of the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans for 2008 to 2007
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.31.

Rejected response: 1.15.

Question: what was the ratio of the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans for 2008 to 2007

Answer: 1.31

Explanation: the ratio of the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans for 2008 to 2007 was 1.31 to 1

the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 35341 , $ 26996 and $ 43594 for 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively .

the company 2019s liability related to the vap at december 31 , 2007 was $ 986 .

the expense ( benefit ) was $ ( 6 ) , $ ( 267 ) and $ 3406 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively .

Answer: 1.31

Question: what was the ratio of the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans for 2009 to 2008

Answer: 1.15

the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 40627 , $ 35341 and $ 26996 for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

in 2009 , the company recorded a $ 3944 benefit expense as a result of enhanced postretirement medical benefits under the postretirement plan provided to employees that chose to participate in a voluntary transition program. .

Answer: 1.15


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the number of unvested restricted stock in 2010?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 432303.

Rejected response: 61523.

CB || what is the net change in the number of unvested restricted stock <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the number of unvested restricted stock in 2010?

Answer: 432303

the unvested restricted stock december 31 2009 of number of restricted stock is 4873429 ; the unvested restricted stock december 31 2009 of weighted-average grant-date fair value is $ 48.25 ;

the unvested restricted stock december 31 2010 of number of restricted stock is 5305732 ; the unvested restricted stock december 31 2010 of weighted-average grant-date fair value is $ 48.74 ;

at december 31 , 2010 , the number of unvested restricted stock units was 636758 .

Answer: 432303

Question: what is the net change in the number of unvested restricted stock in 2008?

Answer: 61523

the unvested restricted stock december 31 2007 of number of restricted stock is 3821707 ; the unvested restricted stock december 31 2007 of weighted-average grant-date fair value is $ 53.12 ;

the unvested restricted stock december 31 2008 of number of restricted stock is 3883230 ; the unvested restricted stock december 31 2008 of weighted-average grant-date fair value is $ 57.01 ;

The unvested restricted stock december 31 2010 of number of restricted stock is 5305732 ; The unvested restricted stock december 31 2010 of weighted-average grant-date fair value is $ 48.74 ;

Answer: 61523


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the number of unvested restricted stock in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 61523.

Rejected response: 432303.

Question: what is the net change in the number of unvested restricted stock in 2008?

Answer: 61523

the unvested restricted stock december 31 2007 of number of restricted stock is 3821707 ; the unvested restricted stock december 31 2007 of weighted-average grant-date fair value is $ 53.12 ;

the unvested restricted stock december 31 2008 of number of restricted stock is 3883230 ; the unvested restricted stock december 31 2008 of weighted-average grant-date fair value is $ 57.01 ;

at december 31 , 2010 , the number of unvested restricted stock units was 636758 .

Answer: 61523

Question: what is the net change in the number of unvested restricted stock in 2010?

Answer: 432303

the unvested restricted stock december 31 2009 of number of restricted stock is 4873429 ; the unvested restricted stock december 31 2009 of weighted-average grant-date fair value is $ 48.25 ;

the unvested restricted stock december 31 2010 of number of restricted stock is 5305732 ; the unvested restricted stock december 31 2010 of weighted-average grant-date fair value is $ 48.74 ;

Answer: 432303


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are due after 2019?
Reference time interval: 2019-01-01 00:00:00 to 2020-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 38%.

Rejected response: 41%.

AAPL || what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are due after <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are due after 2019?

Answer: 38%

as of september 27 , 2014 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 5.0 billion , of which $ 3.6 billion related to leases for retail space .

Answer: 38%

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are due after 2020?

Answer: 41%

as of september 26 , 2015 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 6.3 billion , of which $ 3.6 billion related to leases for retail space .

Answer: 41%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are due after 2020?
Reference time interval: 2020-01-01 00:00:00 to 2021-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 41%.

Rejected response: 38%.

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are due after 2020?

Answer: 41%

Answer: 41%

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are due after 2019?

Answer: 38%

Answer: 38%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments are due after 2020?
Reference time interval: 2020-01-01 00:00:00 to 2021-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 25%.

Rejected response: 6%.

PKG || what percentage of total purchase commitments are due after <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments are due after 2020?

Answer: 25%

total purchase commitments were as follows ( dollars in millions ) : .

Answer: 25%

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments are due after 2018?

Answer: 6%

2014 the thereafter of $ 120971 is 11536 ;

total purchase commitments are as follows ( dollars in thousands ) : .

Answer: 6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments are due after 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6%.

Rejected response: 25%.

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments are due after 2018?

Answer: 6%

2014 the thereafter of $ 120971 is 11536 ;

Answer: 6%

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments are due after 2020?

Answer: 25%

Answer: 25%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the change in estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2013 , from 2014 to 2015 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 70.

Rejected response: 80.

LMT || what is the change in estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , <TIME> , <TIME> in millions?

Question: what is the change in estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2013 , from 2014 to 2015 in millions?

Answer: 70

the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2014 is $ 1960 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2015 is $ 2030 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2016 is $ 2110 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2017 is $ 2200 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2018 is $ 2300 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2019 - 2023 is $ 13240 ;

the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : .

contributions and expected benefit payments we generally determine funding requirements for our defined benefit pension plans in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules .

the retiree medical and life insurance plans of 2014 is 200 ; the retiree medical and life insurance plans of 2015 is 210 ; the retiree medical and life insurance plans of 2016 is 210 ; the retiree medical and life insurance plans of 2017 is 220 ; the retiree medical and life insurance plans of 2018 is 220 ; the retiree medical and life insurance plans of 2019 - 2023 is 1070 ;

our defined contribution plans held approximately 44.7 million and 48.6 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012. .

Answer: 70

Question: what is the change in estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2013 , from 2015 to 2016 in millions?

Answer: 80

Answer: 80


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the change in estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2013 , from 2015 to 2016 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 80.

Rejected response: 70.

Question: what is the change in estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2013 , from 2015 to 2016 in millions?

Answer: 80

the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2014 is $ 1960 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2015 is $ 2030 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2016 is $ 2110 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2017 is $ 2200 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2018 is $ 2300 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2019 - 2023 is $ 13240 ;

the retiree medical and life insurance plans of 2014 is 200 ; the retiree medical and life insurance plans of 2015 is 210 ; the retiree medical and life insurance plans of 2016 is 210 ; the retiree medical and life insurance plans of 2017 is 220 ; the retiree medical and life insurance plans of 2018 is 220 ; the retiree medical and life insurance plans of 2019 - 2023 is 1070 ;

our defined contribution plans held approximately 44.7 million and 48.6 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012. .

Answer: 80

Question: what is the change in estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2013 , from 2014 to 2015 in millions?

Answer: 70

Answer: 70


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the average net sales in millions for aeronautics from 2001 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 14479.

Rejected response: 1647.

LMT || what was the average net sales in millions for aeronautics <TIME>?

Question: what was the average net sales in millions for aeronautics from 2001 to 2013?

Answer: 14479

the net sales of 2013 is $ 14123 ; the net sales of 2012 is $ 14953 ; the net sales of 2011 is $ 14362 ;

aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .

2013 compared to 2012 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2013 decreased $ 830 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 .

the operating profit of 2013 is 1612 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 1699 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 1630 ;

Answer: 14479

Question: what was the average net sales in millions for aeronautics from 2001 to 2013?

Answer: 1647

The net sales of 2013 is $ 14123 ; The net sales of 2012 is $ 14953 ; The net sales of 2011 is $ 14362 ;

Answer: 1647


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the average net sales in millions for aeronautics from 2001 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1647.

Rejected response: 14479.

Question: what was the average net sales in millions for aeronautics from 2001 to 2013?

Answer: 1647

the net sales of 2013 is $ 14123 ; the net sales of 2012 is $ 14953 ; the net sales of 2011 is $ 14362 ;

the operating profit of 2013 is 1612 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 1699 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 1630 ;

2013 compared to 2012 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2013 decreased $ 830 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 .

Answer: 1647

Question: what was the average net sales in millions for aeronautics from 2001 to 2013?

Answer: 14479

Answer: 14479


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by how much did total other income and expense decrease from 2008 to 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 47.4%.

Rejected response: 52.5%.

AAPL || by how much did total other income and expense decrease <TIME>?

Question: by how much did total other income and expense decrease from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: 47.4%

the total other income and expense of 2010 is $ 155 ; the total other income and expense of 2009 is $ 326 ; the total other income and expense of 2008 is $ 620 ;

during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company had no debt outstanding and accordingly did not incur any related interest expense .

The interest income of 2010 is $ 311 ; The interest income of 2009 is $ 407 ; The interest income of 2008 is $ 653 ;

other income and expense other income and expense for the three years ended september 25 , 2010 , are as follows ( in millions ) : total other income and expense decreased $ 171 million or 52% ( 52 % ) to $ 155 million during 2010 compared to $ 326 million and $ 620 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

the other income ( expense ) net of 2010 is -156 ( 156 ) ; the other income ( expense ) net of 2009 is -81 ( 81 ) ; the other income ( expense ) net of 2008 is -33 ( 33 ) ;

Answer: 47.4%

Question: by how much did total other income and expense decrease from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 52.5%

Answer: 52.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by how much did total other income and expense decrease from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 52.5%.

Rejected response: 47.4%.

Question: by how much did total other income and expense decrease from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 52.5%

other income and expense other income and expense for the three years ended september 25 , 2010 , are as follows ( in millions ) : total other income and expense decreased $ 171 million or 52% ( 52 % ) to $ 155 million during 2010 compared to $ 326 million and $ 620 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

the other income ( expense ) net of 2010 is -156 ( 156 ) ; the other income ( expense ) net of 2009 is -81 ( 81 ) ; the other income ( expense ) net of 2008 is -33 ( 33 ) ;

the total other income and expense of 2010 is $ 155 ; the total other income and expense of 2009 is $ 326 ; the total other income and expense of 2008 is $ 620 ;

Answer: 52.5%

Question: by how much did total other income and expense decrease from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: 47.4%

Answer: 47.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what were average net sales for space systems in millions between 2014 and 2016?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6509.

Rejected response: 8309.

LMT || what were average net sales for space systems in millions <TIME>?

Question: what were average net sales for space systems in millions between 2014 and 2016?

Answer: 6509

the net sales of 2016 is $ 9409 ; the net sales of 2015 is $ 9105 ; the net sales of 2014 is $ 9202 ;

space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .

2015 compared to 2014 space systems 2019 net sales in 2015 decreased $ 97 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 .

the operating profit of 2016 is 1289 ; the operating profit of 2015 is 1171 ; the operating profit of 2014 is 1187 ;

2016 compared to 2015 space systems 2019 net sales in 2016 increased $ 304 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , compared to 2015 .

Answer: 6509

Question: what were average net sales for space systems in millions from 2008 to 2010?

Answer: 8309

( in millions ) the net sales of 2010 is $ 8246 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 8654 ; the net sales of 2008 is $ 8027 ;

net sales for space systems decreased by 5% ( 5 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 .

net sales for space systems increased 8% ( 8 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 .

the space shuttle is expected to complete its final flight mission in 2011 and our involvement with its launch and processing activities will end at that time .

( in millions ) the operating profit of 2010 is 972 ; the operating profit of 2009 is 972 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 953 ;

Answer: 8309


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what were average net sales for space systems in millions from 2008 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 8309.

Rejected response: 6509.

Question: what were average net sales for space systems in millions from 2008 to 2010?

Answer: 8309

the space shuttle is expected to complete its final flight mission in 2011 and our involvement with its launch and processing activities will end at that time .

( in millions ) the net sales of 2010 is $ 8246 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 8654 ; the net sales of 2008 is $ 8027 ;

( in millions ) the operating profit of 2010 is 972 ; the operating profit of 2009 is 972 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 953 ;

Answer: 8309

Question: what were average net sales for space systems in millions between 2014 and 2016?

Answer: 6509

the net sales of 2016 is $ 9409 ; the net sales of 2015 is $ 9105 ; the net sales of 2014 is $ 9202 ;

the operating profit of 2016 is 1289 ; the operating profit of 2015 is 1171 ; the operating profit of 2014 is 1187 ;

2016 compared to 2015 space systems 2019 net sales in 2016 increased $ 304 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , compared to 2015 .

Answer: 6509


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the increase in total minimum lease payments between 2003 and 2004 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5.

Rejected response: 13.

AAPL || what was the increase in total minimum lease payments <TIME> in millions?

Question: what was the increase in total minimum lease payments between 2003 and 2004 in millions?

Answer: -5

2003 The total minimum lease payments of $ 83 is $ 464 ;

2003 the total minimum lease payments of $ 83 is $ 464 ;

Answer: -5

Question: what was the increase in total minimum lease payments between 2006 and 2007 in millions?

Answer: 13

Answer: 13


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the increase in total minimum lease payments between 2006 and 2007 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.

Rejected response: -5.

Question: what was the increase in total minimum lease payments between 2006 and 2007 in millions?

Answer: 13

2003 the total minimum lease payments of $ 83 is $ 464 ;

Answer: 13

Question: what was the increase in total minimum lease payments between 2003 and 2004 in millions?

Answer: -5

Answer: -5


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows used in investing activities from 2017 to 2018?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -18%.

Rejected response: -70%.

ZBH || what was the percentage change in cash flows used in investing activities <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows used in investing activities from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: -18%

cash flows used in investing activities were $ 416.6 million in 2018 compared to $ 510.8 million and $ 1691.5 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively .

cash flows used in financing activities were $ 1302.2 million in 2018 .

liquidity and capital resources cash flows provided by operating activities were $ 1747.4 million in 2018 compared to $ 1582.3 million and $ 1632.2 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively .

term loan c and used the cash proceeds along with cash generated from operations throughout the year to repay an aggregate of $ 835.0 million on u.s .

term loan c and used those proceeds , along with cash on hand , to repay the remaining $ 225.0 million outstanding under u.s .

Answer: -18%

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows used in investing activities from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -70%

Answer: -70%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows used in investing activities from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -70%.

Rejected response: -18%.

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows used in investing activities from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -70%

cash flows used in investing activities were $ 416.6 million in 2018 compared to $ 510.8 million and $ 1691.5 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively .

term loan c and used the cash proceeds along with cash generated from operations throughout the year to repay an aggregate of $ 835.0 million on u.s .

term loan c and used those proceeds , along with cash on hand , to repay the remaining $ 225.0 million outstanding under u.s .

Answer: -70%

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows used in investing activities from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: -18%

Answer: -18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of total other income and expense from 2001 to 2002?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2003-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -222.

Rejected response: -278.

AAPL || what was the change in millions of total other income and expense <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in millions of total other income and expense from 2001 to 2002?

Answer: -222

the total other income and expense of 2002 is $ 70 ; the total other income and expense of 2001 is $ 292 ; the total other income and expense of 2000 is $ 570 ;

The miscellaneous other income and expense of 2002 is 5 ; The miscellaneous other income and expense of 2001 is 15 ; The miscellaneous other income and expense of 2000 is 14 ;

the interest income of 2002 is $ 118 ; the interest income of 2001 is $ 218 ; the interest income of 2000 is $ 210 ;

the miscellaneous other income and expense of 2002 is 5 ; the miscellaneous other income and expense of 2001 is 15 ; the miscellaneous other income and expense of 2000 is 14 ;

Answer: -222

Question: what was the change in millions of total other income and expense from 2000 to 2001?

Answer: -278

Answer: -278


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of total other income and expense from 2000 to 2001?
Reference time interval: 2000-01-01 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -278.

Rejected response: -222.

Question: what was the change in millions of total other income and expense from 2000 to 2001?

Answer: -278

the interest income of 2002 is $ 118 ; the interest income of 2001 is $ 218 ; the interest income of 2000 is $ 210 ;

the miscellaneous other income and expense of 2002 is 5 ; the miscellaneous other income and expense of 2001 is 15 ; the miscellaneous other income and expense of 2000 is 14 ;

the total other income and expense of 2002 is $ 70 ; the total other income and expense of 2001 is $ 292 ; the total other income and expense of 2000 is $ 570 ;

Answer: -278

Question: what was the change in millions of total other income and expense from 2001 to 2002?

Answer: -222

Answer: -222


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -157.

Rejected response: 1024.

PM || what was the change in millions of total accumulated other comprehensive losses <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in millions of total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -157

( losses ) earnings ( in millions ) the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of ( losses ) earnings 2017 is $ -8535 ( 8535 ) ; the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of ( losses ) earnings 2016 is $ -9559 ( 9559 ) ; the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of 2015 is $ -9402 ( 9402 ) ;

accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .

reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 .

for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , $ 2 million , $ ( 5 ) million and $ 1 million of net currency translation adjustment gains/ ( losses ) were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries .

Answer: -157

Question: what was the change in millions of total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 1024

Answer: 1024


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1024.

Rejected response: -157.

Question: what was the change in millions of total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 1024

accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .

( losses ) earnings ( in millions ) the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of ( losses ) earnings 2017 is $ -8535 ( 8535 ) ; the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of ( losses ) earnings 2016 is $ -9559 ( 9559 ) ; the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of 2015 is $ -9402 ( 9402 ) ;

for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , $ 2 million , $ ( 5 ) million and $ 1 million of net currency translation adjustment gains/ ( losses ) were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries .

Answer: 1024

Question: what was the change in millions of total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -157

Answer: -157


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in interest expense net from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 31%.

Rejected response: 81%.

UAA || what was the percentage change in interest expense net <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in interest expense net from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 31%

interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities .

the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .

amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

Answer: 31%

Question: what was the percentage change in interest expense net from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 81%

Answer: 81%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in interest expense net from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 81%.

Rejected response: 31%.

Question: what was the percentage change in interest expense net from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 81%

the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .

interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

Answer: 81%

Question: what was the percentage change in interest expense net from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 31%

Answer: 31%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in millions of pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1439.

Rejected response: 5126.

UPS || what was the difference in millions of pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) <TIME>?

Question: what was the difference in millions of pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 1439

the pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) of 2017 is -7794 ( 7794 ) ; the pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) of 2016 is -2668 ( 2668 ) ; the pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) of 2015 is -1229 ( 1229 ) ;

2022 the remaining contributions from 2015 to 2017 were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s .

except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company- sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans .

pension plans totaling $ 7.291 , $ 2.461 and $ 1.030 billion in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

Answer: 1439

Question: what was the difference in millions of pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 5126

Answer: 5126


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in millions of pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5126.

Rejected response: 1439.

Question: what was the difference in millions of pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 5126

the pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) of 2017 is -7794 ( 7794 ) ; the pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) of 2016 is -2668 ( 2668 ) ; the pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) of 2015 is -1229 ( 1229 ) ;

pension plans totaling $ 7.291 , $ 2.461 and $ 1.030 billion in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

2022 the remaining contributions from 2015 to 2017 were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s .

Answer: 5126

Question: what was the difference in millions of pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 1439

Answer: 1439


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: during 2016 what was the average price paid for the shares repurchased by the company?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 107.73.

Rejected response: 90.73.

EW || <TIME> what was the average price paid for the shares repurchased by the company?

Question: during 2016 what was the average price paid for the shares repurchased by the company?

Answer: 107.73

during 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , the company repurchased 7.3 million , 2.6 million , and 4.4 million shares , respectively , at an aggregate cost of $ 662.3 million , $ 280.1 million , and $ 300.9 million , respectively , including .

stock repurchased under these programs may be used to offset obligations under the company 2019s employee stock-based benefit programs and stock-based business acquisitions , and will reduce the total shares outstanding .

the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , at december 31 , 2016 , are expected to be paid ( in millions ) : .

common stock treasury stock in july 2014 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the company to purchase up to $ 750.0 million of the company 2019s common stock .

Answer: 107.73

Question: during 2016 what was the average price paid for the shares repurchased by the company?

Answer: 90.73

Answer: 90.73


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: during 2016 what was the average price paid for the shares repurchased by the company?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 90.73.

Rejected response: 107.73.

Question: during 2016 what was the average price paid for the shares repurchased by the company?

Answer: 90.73

common stock treasury stock in july 2014 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the company to purchase up to $ 750.0 million of the company 2019s common stock .

during 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , the company repurchased 7.3 million , 2.6 million , and 4.4 million shares , respectively , at an aggregate cost of $ 662.3 million , $ 280.1 million , and $ 300.9 million , respectively , including .

Answer: 90.73

Question: during 2016 what was the average price paid for the shares repurchased by the company?

Answer: 107.73

Answer: 107.73


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total gross profit was due to food and ingredients in fiscal 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 19%.

CAG || what percentage of total gross profit was due to food and ingredients in fiscal <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total gross profit was due to food and ingredients in fiscal 2005?

Answer: 18%

reporting segment the food and ingredients of fiscal 2006 gross profit is 538 ; the food and ingredients of fiscal 2005 gross profit is 512 ; the food and ingredients of % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) is 5% ( 5 % ) ;

reporting segment the total of fiscal 2006 gross profit is $ 2823 ; the total of fiscal 2005 gross profit is $ 2834 ; the total of % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) is 2014% ( 2014 % ) ;

food and ingredients gross profit for fiscal 2006 was $ 538 million , an increase of $ 26 million over the prior year .

Answer: 18%

Question: what percentage of total gross profit was due to food and ingredients in fiscal 2006?

Answer: 19%

Answer: 19%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total gross profit was due to food and ingredients in fiscal 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 19%.

Rejected response: 18%.

Question: what percentage of total gross profit was due to food and ingredients in fiscal 2006?

Answer: 19%

reporting segment the food and ingredients of fiscal 2006 gross profit is 538 ; the food and ingredients of fiscal 2005 gross profit is 512 ; the food and ingredients of % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) is 5% ( 5 % ) ;

reporting segment the total of fiscal 2006 gross profit is $ 2823 ; the total of fiscal 2005 gross profit is $ 2834 ; the total of % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) is 2014% ( 2014 % ) ;

food and ingredients gross profit for fiscal 2006 was $ 538 million , an increase of $ 26 million over the prior year .

Answer: 19%

Question: what percentage of total gross profit was due to food and ingredients in fiscal 2005?

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1.4%.

Rejected response: -22.4%.

RE || what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -1.4%

the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances .

such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. .

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 29497 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 29905 ;

Answer: -1.4%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -22.4%

certain reclassifications and format changes have been made to prior years 2019 amounts to conform to the 2015 presentation .

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2015 is $ 22878 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 29497 ;

Answer: -22.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1.4%.

Rejected response: -6.6%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -1.4%

the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances .

such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. .

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 29497 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 29905 ;

Answer: -1.4%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables in 2013?

Answer: -6.6%

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 29905 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 32011 ;

in addition , the company has reclassified the following amounts from 201cdistributions from other invested assets 201d included in cash flows from investing activities to 201cdistribution of limited partnership income 201d included in cash flows from operations for interim reporting periods of 2013 : $ 33686 thousand for the three months ended march 31 , 2013 ; $ 9409 thousand and $ 43095 thousand for the three months and six months ended june 30 , 2013 , respectively ; and $ 5638 thousand and $ 48733 thousand for the three months and nine months ended september 30 , 2013 , respectively .

Answer: -6.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -22.4%.

Rejected response: -1.4%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -22.4%

the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances .

such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. .

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2015 is $ 22878 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 29497 ;

Answer: -22.4%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -1.4%

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 29497 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 29905 ;

Answer: -1.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -22.4%.

Rejected response: -6.6%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -22.4%

the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances .

such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. .

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2015 is $ 22878 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 29497 ;

Answer: -22.4%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables in 2013?

Answer: -6.6%

in addition , the company has reclassified the following amounts from 201cdistributions from other invested assets 201d included in cash flows from investing activities to 201cdistribution of limited partnership income 201d included in cash flows from operations for interim reporting periods of 2013 : $ 33686 thousand for the three months ended march 31 , 2013 ; $ 9409 thousand and $ 43095 thousand for the three months and six months ended june 30 , 2013 , respectively ; and $ 5638 thousand and $ 48733 thousand for the three months and nine months ended september 30 , 2013 , respectively .

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 29905 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 32011 ;

Answer: -6.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -6.6%.

Rejected response: -1.4%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables in 2013?

Answer: -6.6%

in addition , the company has reclassified the following amounts from 201cdistributions from other invested assets 201d included in cash flows from investing activities to 201cdistribution of limited partnership income 201d included in cash flows from operations for interim reporting periods of 2013 : $ 33686 thousand for the three months ended march 31 , 2013 ; $ 9409 thousand and $ 43095 thousand for the three months and six months ended june 30 , 2013 , respectively ; and $ 5638 thousand and $ 48733 thousand for the three months and nine months ended september 30 , 2013 , respectively .

such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. .

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 29905 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 32011 ;

Answer: -6.6%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -1.4%

the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances .

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 29497 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 29905 ;

Answer: -1.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -6.6%.

Rejected response: -22.4%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables in 2013?

Answer: -6.6%

in addition , the company has reclassified the following amounts from 201cdistributions from other invested assets 201d included in cash flows from investing activities to 201cdistribution of limited partnership income 201d included in cash flows from operations for interim reporting periods of 2013 : $ 33686 thousand for the three months ended march 31 , 2013 ; $ 9409 thousand and $ 43095 thousand for the three months and six months ended june 30 , 2013 , respectively ; and $ 5638 thousand and $ 48733 thousand for the three months and nine months ended september 30 , 2013 , respectively .

such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. .

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 29905 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 32011 ;

Answer: -6.6%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -22.4%

the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances .

( dollars in thousands ) the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2015 is $ 22878 ; the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 29497 ;

Answer: -22.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage difference in future minimum rental commitments as of december 31 , 2013 between 2014 and 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2%.

Rejected response: -5%.

MS || what is the percentage difference in future minimum rental commitments as of december 31 , <TIME> <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage difference in future minimum rental commitments as of december 31 , 2013 between 2014 and 2015?

Answer: -2%

year ended the 2014 of operating premises leases is $ 672 ;

year ended the 2015 of operating premises leases is 656 ;

at december 31 , 2013 , future minimum rental commitments under such leases ( net of subleases , principally on office rentals ) were as follows ( dollars in millions ) : year ended operating premises leases .

Answer: -2%

Question: what is the percentage difference in future minimum rental commitments as of december 31 , 2013 between 2015 and 2016?

Answer: -5%

year ended the 2016 of operating premises leases is 621 ;

Answer: -5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage difference in future minimum rental commitments as of december 31 , 2013 between 2015 and 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5%.

Rejected response: -2%.

Question: what is the percentage difference in future minimum rental commitments as of december 31 , 2013 between 2015 and 2016?

Answer: -5%

at december 31 , 2013 , future minimum rental commitments under such leases ( net of subleases , principally on office rentals ) were as follows ( dollars in millions ) : year ended operating premises leases .

year ended the 2015 of operating premises leases is 656 ;

year ended the 2016 of operating premises leases is 621 ;

Answer: -5%

Question: what is the percentage difference in future minimum rental commitments as of december 31 , 2013 between 2014 and 2015?

Answer: -2%

year ended the 2014 of operating premises leases is $ 672 ;

Answer: -2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share between 2011 and 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -12.7.

Rejected response: -4.2.

ZBH || what was the change in millions of weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in millions of weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: -12.7

for the years ended december 31 , the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2013 is 171.8 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2012 is 176.0 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2011 is 188.7 ;

for the years ended december 31, The weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2013 is 169.6 ; The weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2012 is 174.9 ; The weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2011 is 187.6 ;

weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share 169.6 174.9 187.6 effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards 2.2 1.1 1.1 weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share 171.8 176.0 188.7 for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , an average of 3.1 million options to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of the common stock .

the following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares for the basic and diluted share computations ( in millions ) : .

for the years ended december 31, the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2013 is 169.6 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2012 is 174.9 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2011 is 187.6 ;

Answer: -12.7

Question: what was the change in millions of weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share between 2012 and 2013?

Answer: -4.2

Answer: -4.2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share between 2012 and 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -4.2.

Rejected response: -12.7.

Question: what was the change in millions of weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share between 2012 and 2013?

Answer: -4.2

for the years ended december 31, the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2013 is 169.6 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2012 is 174.9 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2011 is 187.6 ;

for the years ended december 31 , the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2013 is 171.8 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2012 is 176.0 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2011 is 188.7 ;

weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share 169.6 174.9 187.6 effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards 2.2 1.1 1.1 weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share 171.8 176.0 188.7 for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , an average of 3.1 million options to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of the common stock .

Answer: -4.2

Question: what was the change in millions of weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: -12.7

the following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares for the basic and diluted share computations ( in millions ) : .

Answer: -12.7


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by what percentage did grant date fair value per share increase from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 36.6%.

Rejected response: 54.7%.

AWK || by what percentage did grant date fair value per share increase <TIME>?

Question: by what percentage did grant date fair value per share increase from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 36.6%

the grant date fair value per share of 2015 is $ 62.10 ; the grant date fair value per share of 2014 is $ 45.45 ; the grant date fair value per share of 2013 is $ 40.13 ;

the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .

because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date .

the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: .

Answer: 36.6%

Question: by what percentage did grant date fair value per share increase from 2013 to 2015?

Answer: 54.7%

Answer: 54.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by what percentage did grant date fair value per share increase from 2013 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 54.7%.

Rejected response: 36.6%.

Question: by what percentage did grant date fair value per share increase from 2013 to 2015?

Answer: 54.7%

the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: .

the grant date fair value per share of 2015 is $ 62.10 ; the grant date fair value per share of 2014 is $ 45.45 ; the grant date fair value per share of 2013 is $ 40.13 ;

the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .

Answer: 54.7%

Question: by what percentage did grant date fair value per share increase from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 36.6%

Answer: 36.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the increase in rent expense from 2008 to 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -14.4%.

Rejected response: 15.9%.

FIS || what is the increase in rent expense <TIME>?

Question: what is the increase in rent expense from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: -14.4%

rent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 116.1 million , $ 100.2 million and $ 117.0 million , respectively .

included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of earnings was rent expense of $ 2.0 million , $ 1.8 million and $ 17.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of earnings was expense of $ 0.1 million and $ 3.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

the company recorded an expense of $ 14.3 million , $ 12.4 million and $ 14.3 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp .

Answer: -14.4%

Question: what is the increase in rent expense from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 15.9%

the company recorded expense of $ 23.1 million , $ 16.6 million and $ 18.5 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , relating to the participation of fis employees in the 401 ( k ) plan .

included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of earnings was expense of $ 0.1 million and $ 3.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

Answer: 15.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the increase in rent expense from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 15.9%.

Rejected response: -14.4%.

Question: what is the increase in rent expense from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 15.9%

rent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 116.1 million , $ 100.2 million and $ 117.0 million , respectively .

included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of earnings was rent expense of $ 2.0 million , $ 1.8 million and $ 17.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of earnings was expense of $ 0.1 million and $ 3.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

Answer: 15.9%

Question: what is the increase in rent expense from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: -14.4%

the company recorded an expense of $ 14.3 million , $ 12.4 million and $ 14.3 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp .

Answer: -14.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for mst in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -0.1%.

Rejected response: -5.6%.

LMT || what is the growth rate in net sales for mst <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for mst in 2014?

Answer: -0.1%

the net sales of 2014 is $ 7147 ; the net sales of 2013 is $ 7153 ; the net sales of 2012 is $ 7579 ;

2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales for 2014 were comparable to 2013 .

adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 50 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 .

the operating profit of 2014 is 843 ; the operating profit of 2013 is 905 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 737 ;

Answer: -0.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for mst in 2013?

Answer: -5.6%

2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 .

Answer: -5.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for mst in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5.6%.

Rejected response: -0.1%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for mst in 2013?

Answer: -5.6%

the net sales of 2014 is $ 7147 ; the net sales of 2013 is $ 7153 ; the net sales of 2012 is $ 7579 ;

the operating profit of 2014 is 843 ; the operating profit of 2013 is 905 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 737 ;

2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 .

Answer: -5.6%

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for mst in 2014?

Answer: -0.1%

2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales for 2014 were comparable to 2013 .

Answer: -0.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -15.2%.

Rejected response: 9.4%.

ADBE || what is the percentage change in the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -15.2%

the beginning balance of 2014 is $ 136098 ; the beginning balance of 2013 is $ 160468 ;

the ending balance of 2014 is $ 148848 ; the ending balance of 2013 is $ 136098 ;

The gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions of 2014 is 18877 ; The gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions of 2013 is 16777 ;

the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2014 is 144 ; the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2013 is 20244 ;

Answer: -15.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 9.4%

Answer: 9.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9.4%.

Rejected response: -15.2%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 9.4%

the beginning balance of 2014 is $ 136098 ; the beginning balance of 2013 is $ 160468 ;

the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2014 is 144 ; the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2013 is 20244 ;

the ending balance of 2014 is $ 148848 ; the ending balance of 2013 is $ 136098 ;

Answer: 9.4%

Question: what is the percentage change in the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -15.2%

Answer: -15.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of vehicles from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -12.

Rejected response: 2.

UPS || what was the change in millions of vehicles <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in millions of vehicles from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -12

the vehicles of 2015 is $ 74 ; the vehicles of 2014 is $ 86 ;

the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : .

the bonds , which were due in december 2015 , had a variable interest rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.04% ( 0.04 % ) , respectively .

under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky .

Answer: -12

Question: what was the change in millions of vehicles from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 2

the vehicles of 2017 is $ 70 ; the vehicles of 2016 is $ 68 ;

the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively .

Answer: 2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of vehicles from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.

Rejected response: -12.

Question: what was the change in millions of vehicles from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 2

the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : .

the vehicles of 2017 is $ 70 ; the vehicles of 2016 is $ 68 ;

under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky .

Answer: 2

Question: what was the change in millions of vehicles from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -12

the vehicles of 2015 is $ 74 ; the vehicles of 2014 is $ 86 ;

Answer: -12


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: for total interest only home equity lines of credit , what percentage of the total includes home equity lines of credit with balloon payments , including those where we have terminated borrowing privileges , with draw periods scheduled to end in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 0.005%.

Rejected response: 1.5%.

PNC || for total interest only home equity lines of credit , what percentage of the total includes home equity lines of credit with balloon payments , including those where we have terminated borrowing privileges , with draw periods scheduled to end <TIME>?

Question: for total interest only home equity lines of credit , what percentage of the total includes home equity lines of credit with balloon payments , including those where we have terminated borrowing privileges , with draw periods scheduled to end in 2016?

Answer: 0.005%

in millions the total ( a ) ( b ) of interest onlyproduct is $ 10349 ; the total ( a ) ( b ) of principal andinterest product is $ 7778 ;

therefore , information about the current lien status of junior lien loans is less readily available in cases where pnc does not also hold the senior lien .

( b ) includes approximately $ 154 million , $ 48 million , $ 57 million , $ 42 million and $ 564 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments , including those where we have terminated borrowing privileges , with draw periods scheduled to end in 2015 , 2016 , 2017 , 2018 and 2019 and thereafter , respectively .

Answer: 0.005%

Question: for total interest only home equity lines of credit , what percentage of the total includes home equity lines of credit with balloon payments , including those where we have terminated borrowing privileges , with draw periods scheduled to end in 2015?

Answer: 1.5%

Answer: 1.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: for total interest only home equity lines of credit , what percentage of the total includes home equity lines of credit with balloon payments , including those where we have terminated borrowing privileges , with draw periods scheduled to end in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.5%.

Rejected response: 0.005%.

Question: for total interest only home equity lines of credit , what percentage of the total includes home equity lines of credit with balloon payments , including those where we have terminated borrowing privileges , with draw periods scheduled to end in 2015?

Answer: 1.5%

therefore , information about the current lien status of junior lien loans is less readily available in cases where pnc does not also hold the senior lien .

in millions the total ( a ) ( b ) of interest onlyproduct is $ 10349 ; the total ( a ) ( b ) of principal andinterest product is $ 7778 ;

( b ) includes approximately $ 154 million , $ 48 million , $ 57 million , $ 42 million and $ 564 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments , including those where we have terminated borrowing privileges , with draw periods scheduled to end in 2015 , 2016 , 2017 , 2018 and 2019 and thereafter , respectively .

Answer: 1.5%

Question: for total interest only home equity lines of credit , what percentage of the total includes home equity lines of credit with balloon payments , including those where we have terminated borrowing privileges , with draw periods scheduled to end in 2016?

Answer: 0.005%

Answer: 0.005%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in percentage sales to restaurants from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1%.

Rejected response: 0%.

SYY || what was the change in percentage sales to restaurants <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in percentage sales to restaurants from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: -1%

type of customer the restaurants of 2006 is 63% ( 63 % ) ; the restaurants of 2005 is 64% ( 64 % ) ; the restaurants of 2004 is 64% ( 64 % ) ;

type of customer The other of 2006 is 16 ; The other of 2005 is 15 ; The other of 2004 is 15 ;

one chain restaurant customer ( wendy 2019s international , inc. ) accounted for 5% ( 5 % ) of sysco 2019s sales for its fiscal year ended july 1 , 2006 .

type of customer the totals of 2006 is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the totals of 2005 is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the totals of 2004 is 100% ( 100 % ) ;

Answer: -1%

Question: what was the change in percentage sales to restaurants from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 0%

type of customer The schools and colleges of 2006 is 5 ; The schools and colleges of 2005 is 5 ; The schools and colleges of 2004 is 5 ;

Answer: 0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in percentage sales to restaurants from 2004 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 0%.

Rejected response: -1%.

Question: what was the change in percentage sales to restaurants from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 0%

type of customer the restaurants of 2006 is 63% ( 63 % ) ; the restaurants of 2005 is 64% ( 64 % ) ; the restaurants of 2004 is 64% ( 64 % ) ;

type of customer the totals of 2006 is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the totals of 2005 is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the totals of 2004 is 100% ( 100 % ) ;

Answer: 0%

Question: what was the change in percentage sales to restaurants from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: -1%

Answer: -1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for mfc in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -0.1%.

Rejected response: 7.7%.

LMT || what is the growth rate in net sales for mfc <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for mfc in 2012?

Answer: -0.1%

the net sales of 2012 is $ 7457 ; the net sales of 2011 is $ 7463 ; the net sales of 2010 is $ 6930 ;

2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 .

adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .

mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 .

Answer: -0.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for mfc in 2011?

Answer: 7.7%

adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 130 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 .

2011 compared to 2010 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2011 decreased $ 540 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2010 .

Answer: 7.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for mfc in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7.7%.

Rejected response: -0.1%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for mfc in 2011?

Answer: 7.7%

2011 compared to 2010 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2011 decreased $ 540 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2010 .

the net sales of 2012 is $ 7457 ; the net sales of 2011 is $ 7463 ; the net sales of 2010 is $ 6930 ;

2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 .

Answer: 7.7%

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for mfc in 2012?

Answer: -0.1%

mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 .

Answer: -0.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total amount spent for stock repurchase during november 2007 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2007-11-01 00:00:00 to 2007-12-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 127.7.

Rejected response: 151.3.

AMT || what is the total amount spent for stock repurchase <TIME> , in millions?

Question: what is the total amount spent for stock repurchase during november 2007 , in millions?

Answer: 127.7

period the november 2007 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 2891719 ; the november 2007 of average price paid per share is $ 44.16 ; the november 2007 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 2891719 ; the november 2007 of approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) is $ 322.2 ;

( 1 ) issuer repurchases pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 .

issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 8895570 shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 385.1 million pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) .

subsequent to december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 4.3 million shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 163.7 million pursuant to this program .

Answer: 127.7

Question: what is the total amount spent for stock repurchase during october 2007 , in millions?

Answer: 151.3

period the october 2007 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 3493426 ; the october 2007 of average price paid per share is $ 43.30 ; the october 2007 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 3493426 ; the october 2007 of approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) is $ 449.9 ;

Answer: 151.3


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total amount spent for stock repurchase during october 2007 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2007-10-01 00:00:00 to 2007-11-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 151.3.

Rejected response: 127.7.

Question: what is the total amount spent for stock repurchase during october 2007 , in millions?

Answer: 151.3

issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 8895570 shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 385.1 million pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) .

period the october 2007 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 3493426 ; the october 2007 of average price paid per share is $ 43.30 ; the october 2007 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 3493426 ; the october 2007 of approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) is $ 449.9 ;

subsequent to december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 4.3 million shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 163.7 million pursuant to this program .

Answer: 151.3

Question: what is the total amount spent for stock repurchase during november 2007 , in millions?

Answer: 127.7

period the november 2007 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 2891719 ; the november 2007 of average price paid per share is $ 44.16 ; the november 2007 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 2891719 ; the november 2007 of approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) is $ 322.2 ;

Answer: 127.7


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2002 to 2003?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.9%.

Rejected response: 4.0%.

AMT || what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: 3.9%

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 approximated $ 118741000 , $ 113956000 , and $ 109644000 , respectively. .

as of december 31 , 2003 , the company had three interest rate caps outstanding with an aggregate notional amount of $ 500.0 million ( each at a rate of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ) that expired in 2004 .

hedge ineffectiveness resulted in a gain of approximately $ 1.0 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 , which is recorded in other expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations .

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2004 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

Answer: 3.9%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 4.0%

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .

during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded a net unrealized gain of approximately $ 6.5 million ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 3.5 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 0.7 million ( net of an income tax benefit of $ 0.2 million ) into results of operations during the year ended december 31 , 2006 .

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

Answer: 4.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2002 to 2003?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.9%.

Rejected response: 4.2%.

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: 3.9%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2004 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 approximated $ 118741000 , $ 113956000 , and $ 109644000 , respectively. .

Answer: 3.9%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 4.2%

as of december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , there was no fair value associated with any of these interest rate caps .

Answer: 4.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2002 to 2003?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.9%.

Rejected response: 40.5%.

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: 3.9%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2004 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 approximated $ 118741000 , $ 113956000 , and $ 109644000 , respectively. .

Answer: 3.9%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 40.5%

merger in august 2005 and were not designated as cash flow hedges .

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .

Answer: 40.5%