Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in operating income for entities in which the company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control and that are accounted for using the equity method between 2002 and 2003?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 49%.

Rejected response: -60%.

Question: what was the percentage change in operating income for entities in which the company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control and that are accounted for using the equity method between 2002 and 2003?

Answer: 49%

during the fourth quarter of 2003 , the company sold its 25% ( 25 % ) ownership interest in medway power limited ( 2018 2018mpl 2019 2019 ) , a 688 mw natural gas-fired combined cycle facility located in the united kingdom , and aes medway operations limited ( 2018 2018aesmo 2019 2019 ) , the operating company for the facility , in an aggregate transaction valued at approximately a347 million ( $ 78 million ) .

as of and for the years ended december 31, the revenues of 2003 is $ 2758 ; the revenues of 2002 ( 1 ) is $ 2832 ; the revenues of 2001 ( 1 ) is $ 6147 ;

as of and for the years ended december 31 , the operating income of 2003 is 1039 ; the operating income of 2002 ( 1 ) is 695 ; the operating income of 2001 ( 1 ) is 1717 ;

Answer: 49%

Question: what was the percentage change in operating income for entities in which the company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control and that are accounted for using the equity method between 2001 and 2002?

Answer: -60%

Answer: -60%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the effective tax rate for pca in 2004?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 38%.

Rejected response: 40%.

PKG || what was the effective tax rate for pca <TIME>?

Question: what was the effective tax rate for pca in 2004?

Answer: 38%

( in millions ) the income before taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is 88.0 ; the income before taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2004 is 110.9 ; the income before taxes of change is -22.9 ( 22.9 ) ;

( in millions ) the provision for income taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is -35.4 ( 35.4 ) ; the provision for income taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2004 is -42.2 ( 42.2 ) ; the provision for income taxes of change is 6.8 ;

excluding pca 2019s acquisition of midland container in april 2005 , corrugated products volume was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) higher in 2005 than 2004 and up 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) compared to 2004 on a shipment-per-workday basis .

( in millions ) the income before interest and taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is $ 116.1 ; the income before interest and taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2004 is $ 140.5 ; the income before interest and taxes of change is $ -24.4 ( 24.4 ) ;

Answer: 38%

Question: what was the effective tax rate for pca in 2005?

Answer: 40%

Answer: 40%

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the effective tax rate for pca in 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 40%.

Rejected response: 38%.

Question: what was the effective tax rate for pca in 2005?

Answer: 40%

( in millions ) the income before interest and taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is $ 116.1 ; the income before interest and taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2004 is $ 140.5 ; the income before interest and taxes of change is $ -24.4 ( 24.4 ) ;

( in millions ) the income before taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is 88.0 ; the income before taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2004 is 110.9 ; the income before taxes of change is -22.9 ( 22.9 ) ;

( in millions ) the provision for income taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is -35.4 ( 35.4 ) ; the provision for income taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2004 is -42.2 ( 42.2 ) ; the provision for income taxes of change is 6.8 ;

Answer: 40%

Question: what was the effective tax rate for pca in 2004?

Answer: 38%

Answer: 38%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in millions of cash payments for federal , state , and foreign income taxes between 2014 and 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 48.8.

Rejected response: 98.8.

PKG || what was the difference in millions of cash payments for federal , state , and foreign income taxes <TIME>?

Question: what was the difference in millions of cash payments for federal , state , and foreign income taxes between 2014 and 2015?

Answer: 48.8

cash payments for federal , state , and foreign income taxes were $ 238.3 million , $ 189.5 million , and $ 90.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively .

the tax years 2014 2014 2015 remain open to federal examination .

of the total , $ 4.2 million ( net of the federal benefit for state taxes ) would impact the effective tax rate if recognized .

the balance as of january 1 of 2015 is $ -4.4 ( 4.4 ) ; the balance as of january 1 of 2014 is $ -5.4 ( 5.4 ) ; the balance as of january 1 of 2013 is $ -111.3 ( 111.3 ) ;

the balance at december 31 of 2015 is $ -5.8 ( 5.8 ) ; the balance at december 31 of 2014 is $ -4.4 ( 4.4 ) ; the balance at december 31 of 2013 is $ -5.4 ( 5.4 ) ;

Answer: 48.8

Question: what was the difference in millions of cash payments for federal , state , and foreign income taxes between 2013 and 2014?

Answer: 98.8

in 2013 , we reversed $ 166.0 million of a reserve for unrecognized tax benefits for alternative energy tax credits as a benefit to income taxes .

Answer: 98.8


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in millions of cash payments for federal , state , and foreign income taxes between 2013 and 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 98.8.

Rejected response: 48.8.

Question: what was the difference in millions of cash payments for federal , state , and foreign income taxes between 2013 and 2014?

Answer: 98.8

cash payments for federal , state , and foreign income taxes were $ 238.3 million , $ 189.5 million , and $ 90.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively .

the balance as of january 1 of 2015 is $ -4.4 ( 4.4 ) ; the balance as of january 1 of 2014 is $ -5.4 ( 5.4 ) ; the balance as of january 1 of 2013 is $ -111.3 ( 111.3 ) ;

the balance at december 31 of 2015 is $ -5.8 ( 5.8 ) ; the balance at december 31 of 2014 is $ -4.4 ( 4.4 ) ; the balance at december 31 of 2013 is $ -5.4 ( 5.4 ) ;

Answer: 98.8

Question: what was the difference in millions of cash payments for federal , state , and foreign income taxes between 2014 and 2015?

Answer: 48.8

Answer: 48.8


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11%.

Rejected response: 13%.

GS || what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due in 2015?

Answer: 11%

in millions the 2015 of as of december 2012 is 345 ;

in millions the total of as of december 2012 is $ 3189 ;

the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals .

in millions the 2013 of as of december 2012 is $ 439 ;

Answer: 11%

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due in 2016?

Answer: 13%

$ in millions the 2016 of as of december 2014 is 292 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2014 is $ 2173 ;

$ in millions the 2015 of as of december 2014 is $ 321 ;

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: 11%.

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due in 2016?

Answer: 13%

$ in millions the 2015 of as of december 2014 is $ 321 ;

$ in millions the 2016 of as of december 2014 is 292 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2014 is $ 2173 ;

Answer: 13%

Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due in 2015?

Answer: 11%

in millions the 2013 of as of december 2012 is $ 439 ;

in millions the 2015 of as of december 2012 is 345 ;

in millions the total of as of december 2012 is $ 3189 ;

Answer: 11%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of printing paper sales where north american printing papers sales in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 43%.

Rejected response: 45%.

IP || what percentage of printing paper sales where north american printing papers sales <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of printing paper sales where north american printing papers sales in 2012?

Answer: 43%

in millions the sales of 2012 is $ 6230 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 6215 ; the sales of 2010 is $ 5940 ;

north american pr int ing papers net sales were $ 2.7 billion in 2012 , $ 2.8 billion in 2011 and $ 2.8 billion in 2010 .

in millions the operating profit of 2012 is 599 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 872 ; the operating profit of 2010 is 481 ;

Answer: 43%

Question: what percentage of printing paper sales where north american printing papers sales in 2011?

Answer: 45%

Answer: 45%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of printing paper sales where north american printing papers sales in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 45%.

Rejected response: 43%.

Question: what percentage of printing paper sales where north american printing papers sales in 2011?

Answer: 45%

in millions the sales of 2012 is $ 6230 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 6215 ; the sales of 2010 is $ 5940 ;

in millions the operating profit of 2012 is 599 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 872 ; the operating profit of 2010 is 481 ;

north american pr int ing papers net sales were $ 2.7 billion in 2012 , $ 2.8 billion in 2011 and $ 2.8 billion in 2010 .

Answer: 45%

Question: what percentage of printing paper sales where north american printing papers sales in 2012?

Answer: 43%

Answer: 43%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total expense for all operating leases between 2003 and 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 14%.

Rejected response: 81%.

EW || what was the percentage change in total expense for all operating leases <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in total expense for all operating leases between 2003 and 2004?

Answer: 14%

total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively .

The total obligations and commitments of operating leases is $ 49.8 ; The total obligations and commitments of aggregate debt maturities is $ 267.1 ;

the total obligations and commitments of operating leases is $ 49.8 ; the total obligations and commitments of aggregate debt maturities is $ 267.1 ;

Answer: 14%

Question: what was the percentage change in total expense for all operating leases between 2002 and 2003?

Answer: 81%

Answer: 81%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total expense for all operating leases between 2002 and 2003?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 81%.

Rejected response: 14%.

Question: what was the percentage change in total expense for all operating leases between 2002 and 2003?

Answer: 81%

total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively .

the total obligations and commitments of operating leases is $ 49.8 ; the total obligations and commitments of aggregate debt maturities is $ 267.1 ;

Answer: 81%

Question: what was the percentage change in total expense for all operating leases between 2003 and 2004?

Answer: 14%

Answer: 14%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2015 what percentage of at december 31 , 2013 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is due to purchase obligations?
Reference time interval: 2013-12-31 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 85%.

Rejected response: 95%.

IP || <TIME> what percentage of <TIME> , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is due to purchase obligations?

Question: in 2015 what percentage of at december 31 , 2013 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is due to purchase obligations?

Answer: 85%

in millions the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2014 is 3170 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2015 is 770 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2016 is 642 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2017 is 529 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2018 is 453 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of thereafter is 2404 ;

in millions the total of 2014 is $ 3341 ; the total of 2015 is $ 903 ; the total of 2016 is $ 739 ; the total of 2017 is $ 603 ; the total of 2018 is $ 512 ; the total of thereafter is $ 2566 ;

at december 31 , 2013 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations were as follows: .

in millions the lease obligations of 2014 is $ 171 ; the lease obligations of 2015 is $ 133 ; the lease obligations of 2016 is $ 97 ; the lease obligations of 2017 is $ 74 ; the lease obligations of 2018 is $ 59 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is $ 162 ;

Answer: 85%

Question: in 2014 what percentage of at december 31 , 2013 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is due to purchase obligations?

Answer: 95%

Answer: 95%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2014 what percentage of at december 31 , 2013 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is due to purchase obligations?
Reference time interval: 2013-12-31 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 95%.

Rejected response: 85%.

Question: in 2014 what percentage of at december 31 , 2013 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is due to purchase obligations?

Answer: 95%

in millions the lease obligations of 2014 is $ 171 ; the lease obligations of 2015 is $ 133 ; the lease obligations of 2016 is $ 97 ; the lease obligations of 2017 is $ 74 ; the lease obligations of 2018 is $ 59 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is $ 162 ;

in millions the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2014 is 3170 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2015 is 770 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2016 is 642 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2017 is 529 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2018 is 453 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of thereafter is 2404 ;

in millions the total of 2014 is $ 3341 ; the total of 2015 is $ 903 ; the total of 2016 is $ 739 ; the total of 2017 is $ 603 ; the total of 2018 is $ 512 ; the total of thereafter is $ 2566 ;

Answer: 95%

Question: in 2015 what percentage of at december 31 , 2013 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is due to purchase obligations?

Answer: 85%

Answer: 85%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of printing papers sales in 2007 was from north american printing papers net sales?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 54%.

Rejected response: 66%.

IP || what percent of printing papers sales <TIME> was from north american printing papers net sales?

Question: what percent of printing papers sales in 2007 was from north american printing papers net sales?

Answer: 54%

in millions the sales of 2007 is $ 6530 ; the sales of 2006 is $ 6700 ; the sales of 2005 is $ 6980 ;

north american printing papers net sales in 2007 were $ 3.5 billion compared with $ 4.4 billion in 2006 ( $ 3.5 billion excluding the coated and super- calendered papers business ) and $ 4.8 billion in 2005 ( $ 3.2 billion excluding the coated and super- calendered papers business ) .

printing papers in millions 2007 2006 2005 .

in millions the operating profit of 2007 is $ 1101 ; the operating profit of 2006 is $ 636 ; the operating profit of 2005 is $ 434 ;

Answer: 54%

Question: what percent of printing papers sales in 2006 was from north american printing papers net sales?

Answer: 66%

Answer: 66%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of printing papers sales in 2006 was from north american printing papers net sales?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 66%.

Rejected response: 54%.

Question: what percent of printing papers sales in 2006 was from north american printing papers net sales?

Answer: 66%

in millions the sales of 2007 is $ 6530 ; the sales of 2006 is $ 6700 ; the sales of 2005 is $ 6980 ;

in millions the operating profit of 2007 is $ 1101 ; the operating profit of 2006 is $ 636 ; the operating profit of 2005 is $ 434 ;

north american printing papers net sales in 2007 were $ 3.5 billion compared with $ 4.4 billion in 2006 ( $ 3.5 billion excluding the coated and super- calendered papers business ) and $ 4.8 billion in 2005 ( $ 3.2 billion excluding the coated and super- calendered papers business ) .

Answer: 66%

Question: what percent of printing papers sales in 2007 was from north american printing papers net sales?

Answer: 54%

Answer: 54%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations is due after 2020?
Reference time interval: 2020-01-01 00:00:00 to 2021-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 16%.

Rejected response: 24%.

DISH || what percentage of future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations is due after <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations is due after 2020?

Answer: 16%

2016 the thereafter of $ 76676 is 64000 ;

2016 the total minimum lease payments of $ 76676 is 390719 ;

dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2015 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 .

Answer: 16%

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations is due after 2019?

Answer: 24%

2015 the thereafter of $ 77089 is 112000 ;

2015 the total minimum lease payments of $ 77089 is 468218 ;

future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2014 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 .

Answer: 24%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations is due after 2019?
Reference time interval: 2019-01-01 00:00:00 to 2020-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 24%.

Rejected response: 16%.

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations is due after 2019?

Answer: 24%

2015 the thereafter of $ 77089 is 112000 ;

2015 the total minimum lease payments of $ 77089 is 468218 ;

Answer: 24%

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations is due after 2020?

Answer: 16%

2016 the thereafter of $ 76676 is 64000 ;

2016 the total minimum lease payments of $ 76676 is 390719 ;

Answer: 16%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in reserve for future policy benefits during 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1080.

Rejected response: 4185.

RE || what is the net change in reserve for future policy benefits <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in reserve for future policy benefits during 2012?

Answer: -1080

( dollars in thousands ) the balance at beginning of year of at december 31 , 2012 is $ 67187 ; the balance at beginning of year of at december 31 , 2011 is $ 63002 ; the balance at beginning of year of at december 31 , 2010 is $ 64536 ;

( dollars in thousands ) the balance at end of year of at december 31 , 2012 is $ 66107 ; the balance at end of year of at december 31 , 2011 is $ 67187 ; the balance at end of year of at december 31 , 2010 is $ 63002 ;

( dollars in thousands ) the adjustments to reserves of at december 31 , 2012 is 2365 ; the adjustments to reserves of at december 31 , 2011 is 8449 ; the adjustments to reserves of at december 31 , 2010 is 2944 ;

Answer: -1080

Question: what is the net change in reserve for future policy benefits during 2011?

Answer: 4185

Answer: 4185


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in reserve for future policy benefits during 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4185.

Rejected response: -1080.

Question: what is the net change in reserve for future policy benefits during 2011?

Answer: 4185

( dollars in thousands ) the balance at beginning of year of at december 31 , 2012 is $ 67187 ; the balance at beginning of year of at december 31 , 2011 is $ 63002 ; the balance at beginning of year of at december 31 , 2010 is $ 64536 ;

( dollars in thousands ) the adjustments to reserves of at december 31 , 2012 is 2365 ; the adjustments to reserves of at december 31 , 2011 is 8449 ; the adjustments to reserves of at december 31 , 2010 is 2944 ;

( dollars in thousands ) the balance at end of year of at december 31 , 2012 is $ 66107 ; the balance at end of year of at december 31 , 2011 is $ 67187 ; the balance at end of year of at december 31 , 2010 is $ 63002 ;

Answer: 4185

Question: what is the net change in reserve for future policy benefits during 2012?

Answer: -1080

Answer: -1080


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total brokerage payables at december 31 , 2018 where receivables from customers?
Reference time interval: 2018-12-31 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 22%.

Rejected response: 31%.

C || what percentage of total brokerage payables <TIME> where receivables from customers?

Question: what percentage of total brokerage payables at december 31 , 2018 where receivables from customers?

Answer: 22%

in millions of dollars the receivables from customers of december 31 , 2018 is $ 14415 ; the receivables from customers of december 31 , 2017 is $ 19215 ;

in millions of dollars the total brokerage payables ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2018 is $ 64571 ; the total brokerage payables ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2017 is $ 61342 ;

in millions of dollars The total brokerage receivables ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2018 is $ 35450 ; The total brokerage receivables ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2017 is $ 38384 ;

in millions of dollars the total brokerage receivables ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2018 is $ 35450 ; the total brokerage receivables ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2017 is $ 38384 ;

Answer: 22%

Question: what percentage of total brokerage payables at december 31 , 2017 where receivables from customers?

Answer: 31%

Answer: 31%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total brokerage payables at december 31 , 2017 where receivables from customers?
Reference time interval: 2017-12-31 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 31%.

Rejected response: 22%.

Question: what percentage of total brokerage payables at december 31 , 2017 where receivables from customers?

Answer: 31%

in millions of dollars the receivables from customers of december 31 , 2018 is $ 14415 ; the receivables from customers of december 31 , 2017 is $ 19215 ;

in millions of dollars the total brokerage receivables ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2018 is $ 35450 ; the total brokerage receivables ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2017 is $ 38384 ;

in millions of dollars the total brokerage payables ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2018 is $ 64571 ; the total brokerage payables ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2017 is $ 61342 ;

Answer: 31%

Question: what percentage of total brokerage payables at december 31 , 2018 where receivables from customers?

Answer: 22%

Answer: 22%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net reserves in 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -11.1%.

Rejected response: 13.5%.

RE || what is the growth rate in net reserves <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in net reserves in 2005?

Answer: -11.1%

( dollars in millions ) the net reserves of 2006 is $ 511.4 ; the net reserves of 2005 is $ 450.5 ; the net reserves of 2004 is $ 506.7 ;

( dollars in millions ) The gross reserves of 2006 is 650.1 ; The gross reserves of 2005 is 649.6 ; The gross reserves of 2004 is 728.3 ;

the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the years ended december 31: .

( dollars in millions ) the case reserves reported by ceding companies of 2006 is $ 135.6 ; the case reserves reported by ceding companies of 2005 is $ 125.2 ; the case reserves reported by ceding companies of 2004 is $ 148.5 ;

( dollars in millions ) the gross reserves of 2006 is 650.1 ; the gross reserves of 2005 is 649.6 ; the gross reserves of 2004 is 728.3 ;

Answer: -11.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in net reserves in 2006?

Answer: 13.5%

Answer: 13.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net reserves in 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.5%.

Rejected response: -11.1%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net reserves in 2006?

Answer: 13.5%

( dollars in millions ) the case reserves reported by ceding companies of 2006 is $ 135.6 ; the case reserves reported by ceding companies of 2005 is $ 125.2 ; the case reserves reported by ceding companies of 2004 is $ 148.5 ;

( dollars in millions ) the gross reserves of 2006 is 650.1 ; the gross reserves of 2005 is 649.6 ; the gross reserves of 2004 is 728.3 ;

( dollars in millions ) the net reserves of 2006 is $ 511.4 ; the net reserves of 2005 is $ 450.5 ; the net reserves of 2004 is $ 506.7 ;

Answer: 13.5%

Question: what is the growth rate in net reserves in 2005?

Answer: -11.1%

Answer: -11.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2011 , what percent of new sites were foreign?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 68%.

Rejected response: 89%.

AMT || <TIME> , what percent of new sites were foreign?

Question: in 2011 , what percent of new sites were foreign?

Answer: 68%

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the domestic of 2012 is 960 ; the domestic of 2011 is 470 ; the domestic of 2010 is 950 ;

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the international ( 1 ) of 2012 is 7850 ; the international ( 1 ) of 2011 is 10000 ; the international ( 1 ) of 2010 is 6870 ;

in a majority of our international markets , the acquisition or construction of new sites results in increased pass-through revenues and expenses .

( 1 ) the majority of sites acquired or constructed in 2012 were in brazil , germany , india and uganda ; in 2011 were in brazil , colombia , ghana , india , mexico and south africa ; and in 2010 were in chile , colombia , india and peru .

Answer: 68%

Question: in 2012 , what percent of new sites were foreign?

Answer: 89%

Explanation: foreign = international

Answer: 89%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2012 , what percent of new sites were foreign?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 89%.

Rejected response: 68%.

Question: in 2012 , what percent of new sites were foreign?

Answer: 89%

Explanation: foreign = international

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the domestic of 2012 is 960 ; the domestic of 2011 is 470 ; the domestic of 2010 is 950 ;

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the international ( 1 ) of 2012 is 7850 ; the international ( 1 ) of 2011 is 10000 ; the international ( 1 ) of 2010 is 6870 ;

( 1 ) the majority of sites acquired or constructed in 2012 were in brazil , germany , india and uganda ; in 2011 were in brazil , colombia , ghana , india , mexico and south africa ; and in 2010 were in chile , colombia , india and peru .

Answer: 89%

Question: in 2011 , what percent of new sites were foreign?

Answer: 68%

Answer: 68%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in annual operating cash flow from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 102%.

Rejected response: 83%.

AAPL || what is the percentage change in annual operating cash flow <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in annual operating cash flow from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 102%

the annual operating cash flow of 2011 is $ 37529 ; the annual operating cash flow of 2010 is $ 18595 ; the annual operating cash flow of 2009 is $ 10159 ;

The cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2011 is $ 81570 ; The cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2010 is $ 51011 ; The cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2009 is $ 33992 ;

as of september 24 , 2011 and september 25 , 2010 , $ 54.3 billion and $ 30.8 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s .

the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2011 is $ 81570 ; the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2010 is $ 51011 ; the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2009 is $ 33992 ;

the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months .

Answer: 102%

Question: what is the percentage change in annual operating cash flow from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 83%

Answer: 83%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in annual operating cash flow from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 83%.

Rejected response: 102%.

Question: what is the percentage change in annual operating cash flow from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 83%

the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2011 is $ 81570 ; the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2010 is $ 51011 ; the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2009 is $ 33992 ;

the annual operating cash flow of 2011 is $ 37529 ; the annual operating cash flow of 2010 is $ 18595 ; the annual operating cash flow of 2009 is $ 10159 ;

the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months .

Answer: 83%

Question: what is the percentage change in annual operating cash flow from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 102%

Answer: 102%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are due in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12%.

Rejected response: 13%.

AAPL || what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are due <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are due in 2018?

Answer: 12%

as of september 26 , 2015 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 6.3 billion , of which $ 3.6 billion related to leases for retail space .

Answer: 12%

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are due in 2017?

Answer: 13%

as of september 27 , 2014 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 5.0 billion , of which $ 3.6 billion related to leases for retail space .

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are due in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: 12%.

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are due in 2017?

Answer: 13%

Answer: 13%

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases are due in 2018?

Answer: 12%

Answer: 12%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was non-interest expense as a percentage of revenue in 2003?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 65%.

Rejected response: 77%.

JPM || what was non-interest expense as a percentage of revenue <TIME>?

Question: what was non-interest expense as a percentage of revenue in 2003?

Answer: 65%

( in millions except per share and ratio data ) the revenue of 2003 is $ 33256 ; the revenue of 2002 is $ 29614 ; the revenue of change is 12% ( 12 % ) ;

( in millions except per share and ratio data ) the noninterest expense of 2003 is 21688 ; the noninterest expense of 2002 is 22764 ; the noninterest expense of change is -5 ( 5 ) ;

the investment bank 2019s revenue increased by approximately $ 1.9 billion from 2002 , and chase financial services 2019 revenue was $ 14.6 billion in 2003 , another record year. .

total noninterest expense was $ 21.7 billion , down 5% ( 5 % ) from the prior year .

Answer: 65%

Question: what was non-interest expense as a percentage of revenue in 2002?

Answer: 77%

Explanation: looking at this ratio for a financial institution like a bank demonstrates the leverage or lack of leverage the operations has on profitability .

Answer: 77%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was non-interest expense as a percentage of revenue in 2002?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2003-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 77%.

Rejected response: 65%.

Question: what was non-interest expense as a percentage of revenue in 2002?

Answer: 77%

Explanation: looking at this ratio for a financial institution like a bank demonstrates the leverage or lack of leverage the operations has on profitability .

total noninterest expense was $ 21.7 billion , down 5% ( 5 % ) from the prior year .

( in millions except per share and ratio data ) the revenue of 2003 is $ 33256 ; the revenue of 2002 is $ 29614 ; the revenue of change is 12% ( 12 % ) ;

( in millions except per share and ratio data ) the noninterest expense of 2003 is 21688 ; the noninterest expense of 2002 is 22764 ; the noninterest expense of change is -5 ( 5 ) ;

Answer: 77%

Question: what was non-interest expense as a percentage of revenue in 2003?

Answer: 65%

Answer: 65%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in the next 36 months for entergy corporation as of december 31 , 2016 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1860.4.

Rejected response: 742.7.

ETR || what amount of long-term debt is due in the next 36 months for entergy corporation as of december 31 , <TIME> , in millions?

Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in the next 36 months for entergy corporation as of december 31 , 2016 , in millions?

Answer: 1860.4

the 2017 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 307403 ;

the 2018 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 828084 ;

the 2019 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 724899 ;

Answer: 1860.4

Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in the next 36 months for entergy corporation as of december 31 , 2004 , in millions?

Answer: 742.7

the 2005 of ( in thousands ) is $ 467298 ;

the 2006 of ( in thousands ) is $ 75896 ;

the 2007 of ( in thousands ) is $ 199539 ;

Answer: 742.7


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in the next 36 months for entergy corporation as of december 31 , 2004 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 742.7.

Rejected response: 1860.4.

Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in the next 36 months for entergy corporation as of december 31 , 2004 , in millions?

Answer: 742.7

the 2005 of ( in thousands ) is $ 467298 ;

the 2006 of ( in thousands ) is $ 75896 ;

the 2007 of ( in thousands ) is $ 199539 ;

Answer: 742.7

Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in the next 36 months for entergy corporation as of december 31 , 2016 , in millions?

Answer: 1860.4

the 2017 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 307403 ;

the 2018 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 828084 ;

the 2019 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 724899 ;

Answer: 1860.4


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent change in cash flows provided by operating activities between 2017 and 2016?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3%.

Rejected response: -9%.

ZBH || what is the percent change in cash flows provided by operating activities <TIME>?

Question: what is the percent change in cash flows provided by operating activities between 2017 and 2016?

Answer: -3%

liquidity and capital resources cash flows provided by operating activities were $ 1747.4 million in 2018 compared to $ 1582.3 million and $ 1632.2 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively .

cash flows used in financing activities were $ 1302.2 million in 2018 .

cash flows used in investing activities were $ 416.6 million in 2018 compared to $ 510.8 million and $ 1691.5 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively .

term loan c and used those proceeds , along with cash on hand , to repay the remaining $ 225.0 million outstanding under u.s .

as further discussed in note 11 to our consolidated financial statements , our debt facilities restrict the payment of dividends in certain circumstances. .

Answer: -3%

Question: what is the percent change in cash flows provided by operating activities between 2018 and 2017?

Answer: -9%

2018 form 10-k annual report ( 8 ) we have incurred other various expenses from specific events or projects that we consider highly variable or have a significant impact to our operating results that we have excluded from our non-gaap financial measures .

Answer: -9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent change in cash flows provided by operating activities between 2018 and 2017?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -9%.

Rejected response: -3%.

Question: what is the percent change in cash flows provided by operating activities between 2018 and 2017?

Answer: -9%

2018 form 10-k annual report ( 8 ) we have incurred other various expenses from specific events or projects that we consider highly variable or have a significant impact to our operating results that we have excluded from our non-gaap financial measures .

liquidity and capital resources cash flows provided by operating activities were $ 1747.4 million in 2018 compared to $ 1582.3 million and $ 1632.2 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively .

as further discussed in note 11 to our consolidated financial statements , our debt facilities restrict the payment of dividends in certain circumstances. .

Answer: -9%

Question: what is the percent change in cash flows provided by operating activities between 2017 and 2016?

Answer: -3%

term loan c and used those proceeds , along with cash on hand , to repay the remaining $ 225.0 million outstanding under u.s .

Answer: -3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: fuel surcharge programs represented what share of revenue in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11.2%.

Rejected response: 7.1%.

UNP || fuel surcharge programs represented what share of revenue <TIME>?

Question: fuel surcharge programs represented what share of revenue in 2011?

Answer: 11.2%

millions the total of 2011 is $ 19557 ; the total of 2010 is $ 16965 ; the total of 2009 is $ 14143 ; the total of % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 is 15% ( 15 % ) ; the total of % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 is 20% ( 20 % ) ;

our fuel surcharge programs ( excluding index-based contract escalators that contain some provision for fuel ) generated freight revenues of $ 2.2 billion , $ 1.2 billion , and $ 605 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively .

additionally , fuel surcharge revenue is not entirely comparable to prior periods as we continue to convert portions of our non-regulated traffic to mileage-based fuel surcharge programs .

millions the freight revenues of 2011 is $ 18508 ; the freight revenues of 2010 is $ 16069 ; the freight revenues of 2009 is $ 13373 ; the freight revenues of % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 is 15% ( 15 % ) ; the freight revenues of % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 is 20% ( 20 % ) ;

Answer: 11.2%

Question: fuel surcharge programs represented what share of revenue in 2010?

Answer: 7.1%

Answer: 7.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: fuel surcharge programs represented what share of revenue in 2010?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7.1%.

Rejected response: 11.2%.

Question: fuel surcharge programs represented what share of revenue in 2010?

Answer: 7.1%

millions the freight revenues of 2011 is $ 18508 ; the freight revenues of 2010 is $ 16069 ; the freight revenues of 2009 is $ 13373 ; the freight revenues of % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 is 15% ( 15 % ) ; the freight revenues of % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 is 20% ( 20 % ) ;

millions the total of 2011 is $ 19557 ; the total of 2010 is $ 16965 ; the total of 2009 is $ 14143 ; the total of % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 is 15% ( 15 % ) ; the total of % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 is 20% ( 20 % ) ;

our fuel surcharge programs ( excluding index-based contract escalators that contain some provision for fuel ) generated freight revenues of $ 2.2 billion , $ 1.2 billion , and $ 605 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively .

Answer: 7.1%

Question: fuel surcharge programs represented what share of revenue in 2011?

Answer: 11.2%

Answer: 11.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent change in cumulative translation adjustment between 2004 and 2006?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -21.9%.

Rejected response: 98.3%.

EMN || what is the percent change in cumulative translation adjustment <TIME>?

Question: what is the percent change in cumulative translation adjustment between 2004 and 2006?

Answer: -21.9%

( dollars in millions ) the balance at december 31 2004 of cumulative translation adjustment$ is 155 ; the balance at december 31 2004 of unfundedadditionalminimum pension liability$ is -248 ( 248 ) ; the balance at december 31 2004 of unrecognized loss and prior service cost net of taxes$ is -- ; the balance at december 31 2004 of unrealized gains ( losses ) on cash flow hedges$ is -8 ( 8 ) ; the balance at december 31 2004 of unrealized losses on investments$ is -2 ( 2 ) ; the balance at december 31 2004 of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) $ is -103 ( 103 ) ;

( dollars in millions ) the balance at december 31 2006 of cumulative translation adjustment$ is 121 ; the balance at december 31 2006 of unfundedadditionalminimum pension liability$ is -- ; the balance at december 31 2006 of unrecognized loss and prior service cost net of taxes$ is -288 ( 288 ) ; the balance at december 31 2006 of unrealized gains ( losses ) on cash flow hedges$ is -6 ( 6 ) ; the balance at december 31 2006 of unrealized losses on investments$ is -1 ( 1 ) ; the balance at december 31 2006 of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) $ is -174 ( 174 ) ;

158 -- 207 ( 288 ) -- -- ( 81 ) balance at december 31 , 2006 121 -- ( 288 ) ( 6 ) ( 1 ) ( 174 ) except for cumulative translation adjustment , amounts of other comprehensive income ( loss ) are presented net of applicable taxes .

Answer: -21.9%

Question: what is the percent change in cumulative translation adjustment between 2005 and 2006?

Answer: 98.3%

( dollars in millions ) the balance at december 31 2005 of cumulative translation adjustment$ is 61 ; the balance at december 31 2005 of unfundedadditionalminimum pension liability$ is -255 ( 255 ) ; the balance at december 31 2005 of unrecognized loss and prior service cost net of taxes$ is -- ; the balance at december 31 2005 of unrealized gains ( losses ) on cash flow hedges$ is -5 ( 5 ) ; the balance at december 31 2005 of unrealized losses on investments$ is -1 ( 1 ) ; the balance at december 31 2005 of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) $ is -200 ( 200 ) ;

Answer: 98.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent change in cumulative translation adjustment between 2005 and 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 98.3%.

Rejected response: -21.9%.

Question: what is the percent change in cumulative translation adjustment between 2005 and 2006?

Answer: 98.3%

( dollars in millions ) the balance at december 31 2005 of cumulative translation adjustment$ is 61 ; the balance at december 31 2005 of unfundedadditionalminimum pension liability$ is -255 ( 255 ) ; the balance at december 31 2005 of unrecognized loss and prior service cost net of taxes$ is -- ; the balance at december 31 2005 of unrealized gains ( losses ) on cash flow hedges$ is -5 ( 5 ) ; the balance at december 31 2005 of unrealized losses on investments$ is -1 ( 1 ) ; the balance at december 31 2005 of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) $ is -200 ( 200 ) ;

( dollars in millions ) the balance at december 31 2006 of cumulative translation adjustment$ is 121 ; the balance at december 31 2006 of unfundedadditionalminimum pension liability$ is -- ; the balance at december 31 2006 of unrecognized loss and prior service cost net of taxes$ is -288 ( 288 ) ; the balance at december 31 2006 of unrealized gains ( losses ) on cash flow hedges$ is -6 ( 6 ) ; the balance at december 31 2006 of unrealized losses on investments$ is -1 ( 1 ) ; the balance at december 31 2006 of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) $ is -174 ( 174 ) ;

Answer: 98.3%

Question: what is the percent change in cumulative translation adjustment between 2004 and 2006?

Answer: -21.9%

( dollars in millions ) the balance at december 31 2004 of cumulative translation adjustment$ is 155 ; the balance at december 31 2004 of unfundedadditionalminimum pension liability$ is -248 ( 248 ) ; the balance at december 31 2004 of unrecognized loss and prior service cost net of taxes$ is -- ; the balance at december 31 2004 of unrealized gains ( losses ) on cash flow hedges$ is -8 ( 8 ) ; the balance at december 31 2004 of unrealized losses on investments$ is -2 ( 2 ) ; the balance at december 31 2004 of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) $ is -103 ( 103 ) ;

Answer: -21.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted from 2003 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11.6%.

Rejected response: 183.4%.

AMT || what is the growth rate in weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 11.6%

the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively .

no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 .

The approximate risk-free interest rate of 2004 is 4.23% ( 4.23 % ) ; The approximate risk-free interest rate of 2003 is 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) ; The approximate risk-free interest rate of 2002 is 4.53% ( 4.53 % ) ;

the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .

the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .

Answer: 11.6%

Question: what is the growth rate in weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: 183.4%

the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model .

Answer: 183.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted from 2002 to 2003?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 183.4%.

Rejected response: 11.6%.

Question: what is the growth rate in weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: 183.4%

the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively .

the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .

the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model .

Answer: 183.4%

Question: what is the growth rate in weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 11.6%

the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .

Answer: 11.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations due in 2009 are comprised of long-term debt obligations?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 68%.

Rejected response: 94%.

C || what percentage of total contractual obligations due <TIME> are comprised of long-term debt obligations?

Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations due in 2009 are comprised of long-term debt obligations?

Answer: 68%

in millions of dollars at year end the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2009 is $ 88472 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 41431 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 42112 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 27999 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 25955 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 133624 ;

in millions of dollars at year end the total of contractual obligations by year 2009 is $ 130377 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 44301 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 43981 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 29489 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 27310 ; the total of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 141548 ;

it includes the maturity profile of the company 2019s consolidated long-term debt , operating leases and other long-term liabilities .

accordingly , no amounts have been included in the table below for future contributions to the u.s .

Answer: 68%

Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations due in 2010 are comprised of long-term debt obligations?

Answer: 94%

Answer: 94%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations due in 2010 are comprised of long-term debt obligations?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 94%.

Rejected response: 68%.

Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations due in 2010 are comprised of long-term debt obligations?

Answer: 94%

accordingly , no amounts have been included in the table below for future contributions to the u.s .

in millions of dollars at year end the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2009 is $ 88472 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 41431 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 42112 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 27999 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 25955 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 133624 ;

in millions of dollars at year end the total of contractual obligations by year 2009 is $ 130377 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 44301 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 43981 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 29489 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 27310 ; the total of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 141548 ;

Answer: 94%

Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations due in 2009 are comprised of long-term debt obligations?

Answer: 68%

Answer: 68%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the operating income margin for 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10%.

Rejected response: 6%.

PKG || what was the operating income margin <TIME>?

Question: what was the operating income margin for 2006?

Answer: 10%

Explanation: operating margin comparison point to increasing or decreasing efficiency .

( in millions ) the net sales of for the year ended december 31 , 2006 is $ 2187.1 ; the net sales of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is $ 1993.7 ; the net sales of change is $ 193.4 ;

( in millions ) the income from operations of for the year ended december 31 , 2006 is $ 225.9 ; the income from operations of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is $ 116.1 ; the income from operations of change is $ 109.8 ;

( in millions ) The net income of for the year ended december 31 , 2006 is $ 125.0 ; The net income of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is $ 52.6 ; The net income of change is $ 72.4 ;

( in millions ) the income before taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2006 is 194.7 ; the income before taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is 88.0 ; the income before taxes of change is 106.7 ;

Answer: 10%

Question: what was the operating income margin for 2005?

Answer: 6%

Answer: 6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the operating income margin for 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6%.

Rejected response: 10%.

Question: what was the operating income margin for 2005?

Answer: 6%

( in millions ) the net sales of for the year ended december 31 , 2006 is $ 2187.1 ; the net sales of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is $ 1993.7 ; the net sales of change is $ 193.4 ;

( in millions ) the income from operations of for the year ended december 31 , 2006 is $ 225.9 ; the income from operations of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is $ 116.1 ; the income from operations of change is $ 109.8 ;

( in millions ) the income before taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2006 is 194.7 ; the income before taxes of for the year ended december 31 , 2005 is 88.0 ; the income before taxes of change is 106.7 ;

Answer: 6%

Question: what was the operating income margin for 2006?

Answer: 10%

Explanation: operating margin comparison point to increasing or decreasing efficiency .

Answer: 10%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: was percentage of consumer packaging sales was due to foodservice net sales in 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17%.

Rejected response: 18%.

IP || was percentage of consumer packaging sales was due to foodservice net sales <TIME>?

Question: was percentage of consumer packaging sales was due to foodservice net sales in 2005?

Answer: 17%

in millions the sales of 2005 is $ 2590 ; the sales of 2004 is $ 2605 ; the sales of 2003 is $ 2465 ;

foodservice net sales were $ 437 million in 2005 compared with $ 480 million in 2004 and $ 460 million in 2003 .

consumer packaging in millions 2005 2004 2003 .

consumer packaging 2019s 2005 net sales of $ 2.6 bil- lion were flat compared with 2004 and 5% ( 5 % ) higher com- pared with 2003 .

Answer: 17%

Question: was percentage of consumer packaging sales was due to foodservice net sales in 2004?

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: was percentage of consumer packaging sales was due to foodservice net sales in 2004?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 17%.

Question: was percentage of consumer packaging sales was due to foodservice net sales in 2004?

Answer: 18%

consumer packaging 2019s 2005 net sales of $ 2.6 bil- lion were flat compared with 2004 and 5% ( 5 % ) higher com- pared with 2003 .

in millions the sales of 2005 is $ 2590 ; the sales of 2004 is $ 2605 ; the sales of 2003 is $ 2465 ;

foodservice net sales were $ 437 million in 2005 compared with $ 480 million in 2004 and $ 460 million in 2003 .

Answer: 18%

Question: was percentage of consumer packaging sales was due to foodservice net sales in 2005?

Answer: 17%

Answer: 17%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the debt-to-total asset ratio in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.5%.

Rejected response: 2.7%.

GS || what is the debt-to-total asset ratio <TIME>?

Question: what is the debt-to-total asset ratio in 2016?

Answer: 2.5%

$ in millions the debt of as of december 2016 is 21675 ; the debt of as of december 2015 is 23216 ;

$ in millions the total assets of as of december 2016 is $ 860165 ; the total assets of as of december 2015 is $ 861395 ;

$ in millions The total inventory and relatedassets of as of december 2016 is 400143 ; The total inventory and relatedassets of as of december 2015 is 406552 ;

the table below presents our balance sheet allocation. .

Answer: 2.5%

Question: what is the debt-to-total asset ratio in 2015?

Answer: 2.7%

Answer: 2.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the debt-to-total asset ratio in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.7%.

Rejected response: 2.5%.

Question: what is the debt-to-total asset ratio in 2015?

Answer: 2.7%

the table below presents our balance sheet allocation. .

$ in millions the debt of as of december 2016 is 21675 ; the debt of as of december 2015 is 23216 ;

$ in millions the total assets of as of december 2016 is $ 860165 ; the total assets of as of december 2015 is $ 861395 ;

Answer: 2.7%

Question: what is the debt-to-total asset ratio in 2016?

Answer: 2.5%

Answer: 2.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the average price per share for the repurchased shares during 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 45.35.

Rejected response: 46.95.

GIS || what is the average price per share for the repurchased shares <TIME>?

Question: what is the average price per share for the repurchased shares during 2005?

Answer: 45.35

in fiscal 2005 , we repurchased 17 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 771 million .

during fiscal 2006 , we repurchased 19 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 892 million , of which $ 7 million settled after the end of our fiscal year .

on october 28 , 2005 , we repurchased a significant portion of our zero coupon convertible debentures pursuant to put rights of the holders for an aggregate purchase price of $ 1.33 billion , including $ 77 million of accreted original issue discount .

Answer: 45.35

Question: what is the average price per share for the repurchased shares during 2006?

Answer: 46.95

a total of 146 million shares were held in treasury at may 28 , 2006 .

Answer: 46.95


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the average price per share for the repurchased shares during 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 46.95.

Rejected response: 45.35.

Question: what is the average price per share for the repurchased shares during 2006?

Answer: 46.95

during fiscal 2006 , we repurchased 19 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 892 million , of which $ 7 million settled after the end of our fiscal year .

in fiscal 2005 , we repurchased 17 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 771 million .

a total of 146 million shares were held in treasury at may 28 , 2006 .

Answer: 46.95

Question: what is the average price per share for the repurchased shares during 2005?

Answer: 45.35

on october 28 , 2005 , we repurchased a significant portion of our zero coupon convertible debentures pursuant to put rights of the holders for an aggregate purchase price of $ 1.33 billion , including $ 77 million of accreted original issue discount .

Answer: 45.35


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in research and development costs between 2001 and 2002?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2003-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10%.

Rejected response: 14%.

AOS || what was the percentage change in research and development costs <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in research and development costs between 2001 and 2002?

Answer: 10%

research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred and amounted to $ 34.6 , $ 30.4 and $ 27.6 million during 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .

advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred and amounted to $ 18.4 , $ 16.2 and $ 8.8 million during 2003 , 2002 and 2001 respectively .

years ended december 31 ( dollars in millions ) the balance at beginning of year of 2003 is $ 63.2 ; the balance at beginning of year of 2002 is $ 69.6 ;

years ended december 31 ( dollars in millions ) the balance at end of year of 2003 is $ 62.1 ; the balance at end of year of 2002 is $ 63.2 ;

Answer: 10%

Question: what was the percentage change in research and development costs between 2002 and 2003?

Answer: 14%

the accruals are adjusted as facts and circumstances change .

Answer: 14%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in research and development costs between 2002 and 2003?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 14%.

Rejected response: 10%.

Question: what was the percentage change in research and development costs between 2002 and 2003?

Answer: 14%

research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred and amounted to $ 34.6 , $ 30.4 and $ 27.6 million during 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .

years ended december 31 ( dollars in millions ) the balance at beginning of year of 2003 is $ 63.2 ; the balance at beginning of year of 2002 is $ 69.6 ;

years ended december 31 ( dollars in millions ) the balance at end of year of 2003 is $ 62.1 ; the balance at end of year of 2002 is $ 63.2 ;

Answer: 14%

Question: what was the percentage change in research and development costs between 2001 and 2002?

Answer: 10%

Answer: 10%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent change in estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.91%.

Rejected response: 23.8%.

BLK || what is the percent change in estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets <TIME>?

Question: what is the percent change in estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 1.91%

estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years is as follows : ( dollar amounts in millions ) .

in december 2009 , in conjunction with the bgi trans- action , the company acquired $ 163 million of finite- lived management contracts with a weighted-average estimated useful life of approximately 10 years .

Answer: 1.91%

Question: what is the percent change in estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 23.8%

estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years is as follows : ( in millions ) .

Answer: 23.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent change in estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 23.8%.

Rejected response: 1.91%.

Question: what is the percent change in estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 23.8%

estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years is as follows : ( in millions ) .

Answer: 23.8%

Question: what is the percent change in estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 1.91%

estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years is as follows : ( dollar amounts in millions ) .

Answer: 1.91%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2014 what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2013 was attributable to maturities of long-term debt?
Reference time interval: 2013-12-31 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17%.

Rejected response: 36%.

IP || <TIME> what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations <TIME> was attributable to maturities of long-term debt?

Question: in 2014 what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2013 was attributable to maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 17%

in millions the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2014 is $ 661 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2015 is $ 498 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2016 is $ 571 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2017 is $ 285 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2018 is $ 1837 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of thereafter is $ 5636 ;

in millions the total ( d ) of 2014 is $ 4002 ; the total ( d ) of 2015 is $ 1401 ; the total ( d ) of 2016 is $ 6495 ; the total ( d ) of 2017 is $ 888 ; the total ( d ) of 2018 is $ 2349 ; the total ( d ) of thereafter is $ 8202 ;

contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2013 , were as follows: .

in millions the lease obligations of 2014 is 171 ; the lease obligations of 2015 is 133 ; the lease obligations of 2016 is 97 ; the lease obligations of 2017 is 74 ; the lease obligations of 2018 is 59 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is 162 ;

Answer: 17%

Question: in 2015 what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2013 was attributable to maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 36%

Answer: 36%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2015 what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2013 was attributable to maturities of long-term debt?
Reference time interval: 2013-12-31 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 36%.

Rejected response: 17%.

Question: in 2015 what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2013 was attributable to maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 36%

in millions the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2014 is $ 661 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2015 is $ 498 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2016 is $ 571 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2017 is $ 285 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2018 is $ 1837 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of thereafter is $ 5636 ;

in millions the lease obligations of 2014 is 171 ; the lease obligations of 2015 is 133 ; the lease obligations of 2016 is 97 ; the lease obligations of 2017 is 74 ; the lease obligations of 2018 is 59 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is 162 ;

in millions the total ( d ) of 2014 is $ 4002 ; the total ( d ) of 2015 is $ 1401 ; the total ( d ) of 2016 is $ 6495 ; the total ( d ) of 2017 is $ 888 ; the total ( d ) of 2018 is $ 2349 ; the total ( d ) of thereafter is $ 8202 ;

Answer: 36%

Question: in 2014 what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2013 was attributable to maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 17%

Answer: 17%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what are is the net change in the balance of unpaid losses during 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1584.

Rejected response: 650.

CB || what are is the net change in the balance of unpaid losses <TIME>?

Question: what are is the net change in the balance of unpaid losses during 2007?

Answer: 1584

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the balance at december 31 2006 of gross losses is $ 35517 ; the balance at december 31 2006 of reinsurance recoverable is $ 13509 ; the balance at december 31 2006 of net losses is $ 22008 ;

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the losses and loss expenses incurred of gross losses is 10831 ; the losses and loss expenses incurred of reinsurance recoverable is 3480 ; the losses and loss expenses incurred of net losses is 7351 ;

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the losses and loss expenses paid of gross losses is -9516 ( 9516 ) ; the losses and loss expenses paid of reinsurance recoverable is -3582 ( 3582 ) ; the losses and loss expenses paid of net losses is -5934 ( 5934 ) ;

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the other ( including foreign exchange revaluation ) of gross losses is 280 ; the other ( including foreign exchange revaluation ) of reinsurance recoverable is 113 ; the other ( including foreign exchange revaluation ) of net losses is 167 ;

Answer: 1584

Question: what are is the net change in the balance of unpaid losses during 2008?

Answer: 650

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the losses and loss expenses incurred of gross losses is 10944 ; the losses and loss expenses incurred of reinsurance recoverable is 3341 ; the losses and loss expenses incurred of net losses is 7603 ;

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the losses and loss expenses paid of gross losses is -9899 ( 9899 ) ; the losses and loss expenses paid of reinsurance recoverable is -3572 ( 3572 ) ; the losses and loss expenses paid of net losses is -6327 ( 6327 ) ;

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the other ( including foreign exchange revaluation ) of gross losses is -1367 ( 1367 ) ; the other ( including foreign exchange revaluation ) of reinsurance recoverable is -387 ( 387 ) ; the other ( including foreign exchange revaluation ) of net losses is -980 ( 980 ) ;

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the losses and loss expenses acquired of gross losses is 386 ; the losses and loss expenses acquired of reinsurance recoverable is 33 ; the losses and loss expenses acquired of net losses is 353 ;

Answer: 650


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what are is the net change in the balance of unpaid losses during 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 650.

Rejected response: 1584.

Question: what are is the net change in the balance of unpaid losses during 2008?

Answer: 650

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the losses and loss expenses incurred of gross losses is 10944 ; the losses and loss expenses incurred of reinsurance recoverable is 3341 ; the losses and loss expenses incurred of net losses is 7603 ;

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the losses and loss expenses paid of gross losses is -9899 ( 9899 ) ; the losses and loss expenses paid of reinsurance recoverable is -3572 ( 3572 ) ; the losses and loss expenses paid of net losses is -6327 ( 6327 ) ;

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the other ( including foreign exchange revaluation ) of gross losses is -1367 ( 1367 ) ; the other ( including foreign exchange revaluation ) of reinsurance recoverable is -387 ( 387 ) ; the other ( including foreign exchange revaluation ) of net losses is -980 ( 980 ) ;

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the losses and loss expenses acquired of gross losses is 386 ; the losses and loss expenses acquired of reinsurance recoverable is 33 ; the losses and loss expenses acquired of net losses is 353 ;

Answer: 650

Question: what are is the net change in the balance of unpaid losses during 2007?

Answer: 1584

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the balance at december 31 2006 of gross losses is $ 35517 ; the balance at december 31 2006 of reinsurance recoverable is $ 13509 ; the balance at december 31 2006 of net losses is $ 22008 ;

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the losses and loss expenses incurred of gross losses is 10831 ; the losses and loss expenses incurred of reinsurance recoverable is 3480 ; the losses and loss expenses incurred of net losses is 7351 ;

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the losses and loss expenses paid of gross losses is -9516 ( 9516 ) ; the losses and loss expenses paid of reinsurance recoverable is -3582 ( 3582 ) ; the losses and loss expenses paid of net losses is -5934 ( 5934 ) ;

( in millions of u.s . dollars ) the other ( including foreign exchange revaluation ) of gross losses is 280 ; the other ( including foreign exchange revaluation ) of reinsurance recoverable is 113 ; the other ( including foreign exchange revaluation ) of net losses is 167 ;

Answer: 1584


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12.0%.

Rejected response: 3.1%.

GS || what is the growth rate in operating expenses <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2018?

Answer: 12.0%

$ in millions the total operating expenses of year ended december 2018 is $ 23461 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2017 is $ 20941 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2016 is $ 20304 ;

the increase in operating expenses compared with 2016 was primarily driven by slightly higher compensation and benefits expenses and our investments to fund growth .

operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity .

operating expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 23.46 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 .

operating expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 20.94 billion for 2017 , 3% ( 3 % ) higher than 2016 .

Answer: 12.0%

Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2017?

Answer: 3.1%

Answer: 3.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.1%.

Rejected response: 12.0%.

Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2017?

Answer: 3.1%

$ in millions the total operating expenses of year ended december 2018 is $ 23461 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2017 is $ 20941 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2016 is $ 20304 ;

operating expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 23.46 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 .

operating expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 20.94 billion for 2017 , 3% ( 3 % ) higher than 2016 .

Answer: 3.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2018?

Answer: 12.0%

Answer: 12.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what will be the balance of aggregate principal payments of long-term debt as of december 31 , 2005 , assuming that no new debt is issued?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3168159.

Rejected response: 3283603.

AMT || what will be the balance of aggregate principal payments of long-term debt as of december 31 , <TIME> , assuming that no new debt is issued?

Question: what will be the balance of aggregate principal payments of long-term debt as of december 31 , 2005 , assuming that no new debt is issued?

Answer: 3168159

2004 the balance as of december 31 2003 of $ 77622 is $ 3361225 ;

american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2003 , aggregate principal payments of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

Answer: 3168159

Question: what will be the balance of aggregate principal payments of long-term debt as of december 31 , 2004 , assuming that no new debt is issued?

Answer: 3283603

as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , liabilities related to derivative financial instruments of $ 0.0 million and $ 15.5 million are reflected in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet .

Answer: 3283603


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what will be the balance of aggregate principal payments of long-term debt as of december 31 , 2004 , assuming that no new debt is issued?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3283603.

Rejected response: 3168159.

Question: what will be the balance of aggregate principal payments of long-term debt as of december 31 , 2004 , assuming that no new debt is issued?

Answer: 3283603

american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2003 , aggregate principal payments of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

2004 the balance as of december 31 2003 of $ 77622 is $ 3361225 ;

Answer: 3283603

Question: what will be the balance of aggregate principal payments of long-term debt as of december 31 , 2005 , assuming that no new debt is issued?

Answer: 3168159

Answer: 3168159


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of foreign pretax earnings in 2008 were from discontinued operations?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 50%.

Rejected response: 8%.

C || what percent of foreign pretax earnings <TIME> were from discontinued operations?

Question: what percent of foreign pretax earnings in 2008 were from discontinued operations?

Answer: 50%

foreign pretax earnings approximated $ 10.3 billion in 2008 , $ 9.1 billion in 2007 , and $ 13.6 billion in 2006 ( $ 5.1 billion , $ 0.7 billion and $ 0.9 billion of which , respectively , are in discontinued operations ) .

taxation currently on all foreign pretax earnings earned by a foreign branch .

pretax earnings of a foreign subsidiary or affiliate are subject to u.s .

the following are the major tax jurisdictions in which the company and its affiliates operate and the earliest tax year subject to examination: .

Answer: 50%

Question: what percent of foreign pretax earnings in 2007 were from discontinued operations?

Answer: 8%

federal dtas , $ 4 billion of net state dtas and $ 4 billion of net foreign dtas .

Answer: 8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of foreign pretax earnings in 2007 were from discontinued operations?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 8%.

Rejected response: 50%.

Question: what percent of foreign pretax earnings in 2007 were from discontinued operations?

Answer: 8%

foreign pretax earnings approximated $ 10.3 billion in 2008 , $ 9.1 billion in 2007 , and $ 13.6 billion in 2006 ( $ 5.1 billion , $ 0.7 billion and $ 0.9 billion of which , respectively , are in discontinued operations ) .

taxation currently on all foreign pretax earnings earned by a foreign branch .

federal dtas , $ 4 billion of net state dtas and $ 4 billion of net foreign dtas .

Answer: 8%

Question: what percent of foreign pretax earnings in 2008 were from discontinued operations?

Answer: 50%

the following are the major tax jurisdictions in which the company and its affiliates operate and the earliest tax year subject to examination: .

Answer: 50%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate trend rate in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.30%.

Rejected response: 3.75%.

MRO || what was the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate trend rate <TIME>?

Question: what was the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate trend rate in 2017?

Answer: 3.30%

the initial health care trend rate of 2018 is n/a ; the initial health care trend rate of 2017 is 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) ; the initial health care trend rate of 2016 is 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) ;

the ultimate trend rate of 2018 is n/a ; the ultimate trend rate of 2017 is 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ; the ultimate trend rate of 2016 is 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ;

The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2018 is n/a ; The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2017 is 2025 ; The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2016 is 2025 ;

assumed weighted average health care cost trend rates .

Answer: 3.30%

Question: what was the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate trend rate in 2016?

Answer: 3.75%

Answer: 3.75%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate trend rate in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.75%.

Rejected response: 3.30%.

Question: what was the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate trend rate in 2016?

Answer: 3.75%

assumed weighted average health care cost trend rates .

the initial health care trend rate of 2018 is n/a ; the initial health care trend rate of 2017 is 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) ; the initial health care trend rate of 2016 is 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) ;

the ultimate trend rate of 2018 is n/a ; the ultimate trend rate of 2017 is 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ; the ultimate trend rate of 2016 is 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ;

Answer: 3.75%

Question: what was the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate trend rate in 2017?

Answer: 3.30%

Answer: 3.30%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in free cash flow between 2004 and 2005 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -72.8.

Rejected response: -84.

BLL || what was the difference in free cash flow <TIME> in millions?

Question: what was the difference in free cash flow between 2004 and 2005 in millions?

Answer: -72.8

( $ in millions ) the free cash flow of 2006 is $ 183.1 ; the free cash flow of 2005 is $ 267.1 ; the free cash flow of 2004 is $ 339.9 ;

free cash flow is not a defined term under u.s .

the company defines free cash flow as cash flow from operating activities less additions to property , plant and equipment ( capital spending ) .

based on this , our consolidated free cash flow is summarized as follows: .

( $ in millions ) the cash flows from operating activities of 2006 is $ 401.4 ; the cash flows from operating activities of 2005 is $ 558.8 ; the cash flows from operating activities of 2004 is $ 535.9 ;

Answer: -72.8

Question: what was the difference in free cash flow between 2005 and 2006 in millions?

Answer: -84

Answer: -84


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in free cash flow between 2005 and 2006 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -84.

Rejected response: -72.8.

Question: what was the difference in free cash flow between 2005 and 2006 in millions?

Answer: -84

based on this , our consolidated free cash flow is summarized as follows: .

( $ in millions ) the cash flows from operating activities of 2006 is $ 401.4 ; the cash flows from operating activities of 2005 is $ 558.8 ; the cash flows from operating activities of 2004 is $ 535.9 ;

( $ in millions ) the free cash flow of 2006 is $ 183.1 ; the free cash flow of 2005 is $ 267.1 ; the free cash flow of 2004 is $ 339.9 ;

Answer: -84

Question: what was the difference in free cash flow between 2004 and 2005 in millions?

Answer: -72.8

Answer: -72.8


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -18%.

Rejected response: 28%.

UNP || what was the percentage change in rental income <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -18%

millions of dollars the rental income of 2008 is $ 87 ; the rental income of 2007 is $ 68 ; the rental income of 2006 is $ 83 ;

millions of dollars The interest income of 2008 is 21 ; The interest income of 2007 is 50 ; The interest income of 2006 is 29 ;

other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .

millions of dollars the total of 2008 is $ 92 ; the total of 2007 is $ 116 ; the total of 2006 is $ 118 ;

Answer: -18%

Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 28%

Answer: 28%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -18%.

Rejected response: 41%.

Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -18%

other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .

millions of dollars the rental income of 2008 is $ 87 ; the rental income of 2007 is $ 68 ; the rental income of 2006 is $ 83 ;

millions of dollars the total of 2008 is $ 92 ; the total of 2007 is $ 116 ; the total of 2006 is $ 118 ;

Answer: -18%

Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 41%

millions of dollars the rental income of 2006 is $ 83 ; the rental income of 2005 is $ 59 ; the rental income of 2004 is $ 55 ;

millions of dollars The interest income of 2006 is 29 ; The interest income of 2005 is 17 ; The interest income of 2004 is 10 ;

other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 .

we entered into these contingent guarantees in the normal course of business , and they include guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations .

millions of dollars the total of 2006 is $ 118 ; the total of 2005 is $ 145 ; the total of 2004 is $ 88 ;

Answer: 41%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -18%.

Rejected response: 7%.

Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -18%

other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .

millions of dollars the rental income of 2008 is $ 87 ; the rental income of 2007 is $ 68 ; the rental income of 2006 is $ 83 ;

millions of dollars the total of 2008 is $ 92 ; the total of 2007 is $ 116 ; the total of 2006 is $ 118 ;

Answer: -18%

Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 7%

other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 .

millions of dollars the rental income of 2006 is $ 83 ; the rental income of 2005 is $ 59 ; the rental income of 2004 is $ 55 ;

millions of dollars the total of 2006 is $ 118 ; the total of 2005 is $ 145 ; the total of 2004 is $ 88 ;

Answer: 7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 28%.

Rejected response: -18%.

Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 28%

other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .

millions of dollars the rental income of 2008 is $ 87 ; the rental income of 2007 is $ 68 ; the rental income of 2006 is $ 83 ;

millions of dollars the total of 2008 is $ 92 ; the total of 2007 is $ 116 ; the total of 2006 is $ 118 ;

Answer: 28%

Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -18%

Answer: -18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 28%.

Rejected response: 41%.

Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 28%

other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .

millions of dollars the rental income of 2008 is $ 87 ; the rental income of 2007 is $ 68 ; the rental income of 2006 is $ 83 ;

millions of dollars the total of 2008 is $ 92 ; the total of 2007 is $ 116 ; the total of 2006 is $ 118 ;

Answer: 28%

Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 41%

we entered into these contingent guarantees in the normal course of business , and they include guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations .

millions of dollars the rental income of 2006 is $ 83 ; the rental income of 2005 is $ 59 ; the rental income of 2004 is $ 55 ;

millions of dollars the total of 2006 is $ 118 ; the total of 2005 is $ 145 ; the total of 2004 is $ 88 ;

Answer: 41%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 28%.

Rejected response: 7%.

Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 28%

other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .

millions of dollars the rental income of 2008 is $ 87 ; the rental income of 2007 is $ 68 ; the rental income of 2006 is $ 83 ;

millions of dollars the total of 2008 is $ 92 ; the total of 2007 is $ 116 ; the total of 2006 is $ 118 ;

Answer: 28%

Question: what was the percentage change in rental income from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 7%

other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 .

millions of dollars the rental income of 2006 is $ 83 ; the rental income of 2005 is $ 59 ; the rental income of 2004 is $ 55 ;

millions of dollars the total of 2006 is $ 118 ; the total of 2005 is $ 145 ; the total of 2004 is $ 88 ;

Answer: 7%