Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what are the total operating expenses in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 8247.

Rejected response: 11872.

Question: what are the total operating expenses in 2015?

Answer: 8247

the net sales of 2016 is $ 13462 ; the net sales of 2015 is $ 9091 ; the net sales of 2014 is $ 8732 ;

the operating profit of 2016 is 906 ; the operating profit of 2015 is 844 ; the operating profit of 2014 is 936 ;

the operating margin of 2016 is 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) ; the operating margin of 2015 is 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) ; the operating margin of 2014 is 10.7% ( 10.7 % ) ;

Answer: 8247

Question: what are the total operating expenses in 2009?

Answer: 11872

( in millions ) the net sales of 2010 is $ 14363 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 13532 ; the net sales of 2008 is $ 12803 ;

( in millions ) the operating profit of 2010 is 1712 ; the operating profit of 2009 is 1660 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 1583 ;

( in millions ) the operating margin of 2010 is 11.9% ( 11.9 % ) ; the operating margin of 2009 is 12.3% ( 12.3 % ) ; the operating margin of 2008 is 12.4% ( 12.4 % ) ;

Answer: 11872


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate of revenue from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 0.6%.

Rejected response: 1.9%.

AON || what is the growth rate of revenue <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate of revenue from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 0.6%

years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data ) the revenue of 2014 is $ 7834 ; the revenue of 2013 is $ 7789 ; the revenue of 2012 is $ 7632 ;

equity equity at december 31 , 2014 was $ 6.6 billion , a decrease of $ 1.6 billion from december 31 , 2013 .

the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated with employment levels , corporate revenue and asset values .

years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data ) the operating income of 2014 is 1648 ; the operating income of 2013 is 1540 ; the operating income of 2012 is 1493 ;

revenues are generated primarily through fees paid by clients , commissions and fees paid by insurance and reinsurance companies , and investment income on funds held on behalf of clients .

Answer: 0.6%

Question: what is the growth rate of revenue from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 1.9%

years ended december 31 , the revenue of 2010 is $ 6423 ; the revenue of 2009 is $ 6305 ; the revenue of 2008 is $ 6197 ;

years ended december 31, The operating income of 2010 is 1194 ; The operating income of 2009 is 900 ; The operating income of 2008 is 846 ;

years ended december 31, the operating income of 2010 is 1194 ; the operating income of 2009 is 900 ; the operating income of 2008 is 846 ;

years ended december 31, the operating margin of 2010 is 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) ; the operating margin of 2009 is 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) ; the operating margin of 2008 is 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) ;

Answer: 1.9%

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate of revenue from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.9%.

Rejected response: 0.6%.

Question: what is the growth rate of revenue from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 1.9%

years ended december 31 , the revenue of 2010 is $ 6423 ; the revenue of 2009 is $ 6305 ; the revenue of 2008 is $ 6197 ;

years ended december 31, the operating income of 2010 is 1194 ; the operating income of 2009 is 900 ; the operating income of 2008 is 846 ;

years ended december 31, the operating margin of 2010 is 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) ; the operating margin of 2009 is 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) ; the operating margin of 2008 is 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) ;

Answer: 1.9%

Question: what is the growth rate of revenue from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 0.6%

years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data ) the revenue of 2014 is $ 7834 ; the revenue of 2013 is $ 7789 ; the revenue of 2012 is $ 7632 ;

years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data ) the operating income of 2014 is 1648 ; the operating income of 2013 is 1540 ; the operating income of 2012 is 1493 ;

revenues are generated primarily through fees paid by clients , commissions and fees paid by insurance and reinsurance companies , and investment income on funds held on behalf of clients .

Answer: 0.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what portion of the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2008 is related to non-tower cash flow?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2.0%.

Rejected response: -3.7%.

AMT || what portion of the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 , <TIME> is related to non-tower cash flow?

Question: what portion of the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2008 is related to non-tower cash flow?

Answer: -2.0%

tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008 the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008 of $ 188449 is 739187 ;

tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008 the non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008 of $ 188449 is $ -14611 ( 14611 ) ;

tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008 The consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008 of $ 188449 is 726954 ;

tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008 the consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008 of $ 188449 is 726954 ;

Answer: -2.0%

Question: what portion of the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2006 is related to non-tower cash flow?

Answer: -3.7%

tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2006 the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2006 of $ 157311 is $ 607928 ;

tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2006 the non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2006 of $ 157311 is $ -22614 ( 22614 ) ;

tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2006 The consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2006 of $ 157311 is $ 591 050 ;

tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2006 the consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2006 of $ 157311 is $ 591 050 ;

Answer: -3.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what portion of the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2006 is related to non-tower cash flow?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3.7%.

Rejected response: -2.0%.

Question: what portion of the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2006 is related to non-tower cash flow?

Answer: -3.7%

tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2006 the consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2006 of $ 157311 is $ 591 050 ;

tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2006 the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2006 of $ 157311 is $ 607928 ;

tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2006 the non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2006 of $ 157311 is $ -22614 ( 22614 ) ;

Answer: -3.7%

Question: what portion of the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2008 is related to non-tower cash flow?

Answer: -2.0%

tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008 the consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008 of $ 188449 is 726954 ;

tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008 the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008 of $ 188449 is 739187 ;

tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008 the non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008 of $ 188449 is $ -14611 ( 14611 ) ;

Answer: -2.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements is current as of december 31 , 2005?
Reference time interval: 2019-01-01 00:00:00 to 2020-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4%.

Rejected response: 7%.

AMT || what percentage of outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements is current as of december 31 , <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements is current as of december 31 , 2005?

Answer: 4%

the total of 2006 is 3543016 ; the total of 2005 is 3613429 ;

the less current portion of other long-term obligations of 2006 is -253907 ( 253907 ) ; the less current portion of other long-term obligations of 2005 is -162153 ( 162153 ) ;

financing arrangements outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements consisted of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .

the long-term obligations of 2006 is $ 3289109 ; the long-term obligations of 2005 is $ 3451276 ;

Answer: 4%

Question: what percentage of outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements is current as of december 31 , 2006?

Answer: 7%

Answer: 7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements is current as of december 31 , 2006?
Reference time interval: 2019-01-01 00:00:00 to 2020-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7%.

Rejected response: 4%.

Question: what percentage of outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements is current as of december 31 , 2006?

Answer: 7%

the total of 2006 is 3543016 ; the total of 2005 is 3613429 ;

the less current portion of other long-term obligations of 2006 is -253907 ( 253907 ) ; the less current portion of other long-term obligations of 2005 is -162153 ( 162153 ) ;

the long-term obligations of 2006 is $ 3289109 ; the long-term obligations of 2005 is $ 3451276 ;

Answer: 7%

Question: what percentage of outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements is current as of december 31 , 2005?

Answer: 4%

Answer: 4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of the 2018 derivative receivable ratings were ratings equivalent to junk bonds?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18.

Rejected response: 20.

JPM || what percentage of the <TIME> derivative receivable ratings were ratings equivalent to junk bonds?

Question: what percentage of the 2018 derivative receivable ratings were ratings equivalent to junk bonds?

Answer: 18

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 6373 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 16 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of exposure net of all collateral is 7397 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 18 ;

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 723 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 2 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of exposure net of all collateral is 645 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 2 ;

ratings profile of derivative receivables .

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the total of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is $ 38891 ; the total of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the total of exposure net of all collateral is $ 40415 ; the total of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 100% ( 100 % ) ;

Answer: 18

Question: what percentage of the 2017 derivative receivable ratings were ratings equivalent to junk bonds?

Answer: 20

Answer: 20


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of the 2017 derivative receivable ratings were ratings equivalent to junk bonds?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 20.

Rejected response: 18.

Question: what percentage of the 2017 derivative receivable ratings were ratings equivalent to junk bonds?

Answer: 20

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 6373 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 16 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of exposure net of all collateral is 7397 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 18 ;

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 723 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 2 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of exposure net of all collateral is 645 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 2 ;

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the total of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is $ 38891 ; the total of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the total of exposure net of all collateral is $ 40415 ; the total of % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral is 100% ( 100 % ) ;

Answer: 20

Question: what percentage of the 2018 derivative receivable ratings were ratings equivalent to junk bonds?

Answer: 18

Answer: 18


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of deferred sales in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -25.

Rejected response: 21.

HIG || what is the net change in the balance of deferred sales <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of deferred sales in 2011?

Answer: -25

the balance beginning of year of 2011 is $ 459 ; the balance beginning of year of 2010 is $ 438 ; the balance beginning of year of 2009 is $ 553 ;

the balance end of year of 2011 is $ 434 ; the balance end of year of 2010 is $ 459 ; the balance end of year of 2009 is $ 438 ;

The sales inducements deferred of 2011 is 20 ; The sales inducements deferred of 2010 is 31 ; The sales inducements deferred of 2009 is 59 ;

the sales inducements deferred of 2011 is 20 ; the sales inducements deferred of 2010 is 31 ; the sales inducements deferred of 2009 is 59 ;

Answer: -25

Question: what is the net change in the balance of deferred sales in 2010?

Answer: 21

Answer: 21


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of deferred sales in 2010?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 21.

Rejected response: -25.

Question: what is the net change in the balance of deferred sales in 2010?

Answer: 21

the balance beginning of year of 2011 is $ 459 ; the balance beginning of year of 2010 is $ 438 ; the balance beginning of year of 2009 is $ 553 ;

the sales inducements deferred of 2011 is 20 ; the sales inducements deferred of 2010 is 31 ; the sales inducements deferred of 2009 is 59 ;

the balance end of year of 2011 is $ 434 ; the balance end of year of 2010 is $ 459 ; the balance end of year of 2009 is $ 438 ;

Answer: 21

Question: what is the net change in the balance of deferred sales in 2011?

Answer: -25

Answer: -25


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions between 2015 and 2016 of foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) for aes corporation?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -19.

Rejected response: 3.

AES || what was the change in millions <TIME> of foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) for aes corporation?

Question: what was the change in millions between 2015 and 2016 of foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) for aes corporation?

Answer: -19

years ended december 31 , the aes corporation of 2016 is $ -50 ( 50 ) ; the aes corporation of 2015 is $ -31 ( 31 ) ; the aes corporation of 2014 is $ -34 ( 34 ) ;

foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) in millions were as follows: .

the company recognized a net foreign currency transaction loss of $ 15 million for the year ended december 31 , 2016 primarily due to losses of $ 50 million at the aes corporation mainly due to remeasurement losses on intercompany notes , and losses on swaps and options .

years ended december 31, the total ( 1 ) of 2016 is $ -15 ( 15 ) ; the total ( 1 ) of 2015 is $ 107 ; the total ( 1 ) of 2014 is $ 11 ;

total ( 1 ) $ ( 15 ) $ 107 $ 11 _____________________________ ( 1 ) includes gains of $ 17 million , $ 247 million and $ 172 million on foreign currency derivative contracts for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

Answer: -19

Question: what was the change in millions between 2014 and 2015 of foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) for aes corporation?

Answer: 3

Answer: 3


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions between 2014 and 2015 of foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) for aes corporation?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.

Rejected response: -19.

Question: what was the change in millions between 2014 and 2015 of foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) for aes corporation?

Answer: 3

years ended december 31 , the aes corporation of 2016 is $ -50 ( 50 ) ; the aes corporation of 2015 is $ -31 ( 31 ) ; the aes corporation of 2014 is $ -34 ( 34 ) ;

years ended december 31, the total ( 1 ) of 2016 is $ -15 ( 15 ) ; the total ( 1 ) of 2015 is $ 107 ; the total ( 1 ) of 2014 is $ 11 ;

total ( 1 ) $ ( 15 ) $ 107 $ 11 _____________________________ ( 1 ) includes gains of $ 17 million , $ 247 million and $ 172 million on foreign currency derivative contracts for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

Answer: 3

Question: what was the change in millions between 2015 and 2016 of foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) for aes corporation?

Answer: -19

Answer: -19


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total revenues was represented by merchant services in 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 87%.

Rejected response: 88%.

GPN || what percent of total revenues was represented by merchant services <TIME>?

Question: what percent of total revenues was represented by merchant services in 2006?

Answer: 87%

the merchant services of 2007 is 929142 ; the merchant services of 2006 is 788500 ; the merchant services of 2005 is 687868 ;

the total revenues of 2007 is $ 1061523 ; the total revenues of 2006 is $ 908056 ; the total revenues of 2005 is $ 784331 ;

total revenues from our merchant services and money transfer segments , by geography and sales channel , are as follows ( amounts in thousands ) : .

Answer: 87%

Question: what percent of total revenues was represented by merchant services in 2007?

Answer: 88%

Answer: 88%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total revenues was represented by merchant services in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 88%.

Rejected response: 87%.

Question: what percent of total revenues was represented by merchant services in 2007?

Answer: 88%

total revenues from our merchant services and money transfer segments , by geography and sales channel , are as follows ( amounts in thousands ) : .

the merchant services of 2007 is 929142 ; the merchant services of 2006 is 788500 ; the merchant services of 2005 is 687868 ;

the total revenues of 2007 is $ 1061523 ; the total revenues of 2006 is $ 908056 ; the total revenues of 2005 is $ 784331 ;

Answer: 88%

Question: what percent of total revenues was represented by merchant services in 2006?

Answer: 87%

Answer: 87%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the ratio of operating cash flow to total debt in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.57.

Rejected response: 6.77.

DVN || what is the ratio of operating cash flow to total debt <TIME>?

Question: what is the ratio of operating cash flow to total debt in 2017?

Answer: 3.57

Explanation: this is how many years it would take to repay the debt at existing cash flow with no new debt .

net earnings ( loss ) attributable to devon the operating cash flow of 2017 $ 898 is $ 2909 ; the operating cash flow of change +185% ( +185 % ) is +94% ( +94 % ) ; the operating cash flow of 2016* $ -1056 ( 1056 ) is $ 1500 ; the operating cash flow of change +92% ( +92 % ) is - 69% ( 69 % ) ; the operating cash flow of 2015* $ -12896 ( 12896 ) is $ 4898 ;

net earnings ( loss ) attributable to devon the total debt of 2017 $ 898 is $ 10406 ; the total debt of change +185% ( +185 % ) is +2% ( +2 % ) ; the total debt of 2016* $ -1056 ( 1056 ) is $ 10154 ; the total debt of change +92% ( +92 % ) is - 22% ( 22 % ) ; the total debt of 2015* $ -12896 ( 12896 ) is $ 13032 ;

net earnings ( loss ) attributable to devon The cash and cash equivalents of 2017 $ 898 is $ 2673 ; The cash and cash equivalents of change +185% ( +185 % ) is +36% ( +36 % ) ; The cash and cash equivalents of 2016* $ -1056 ( 1056 ) is $ 1959 ; The cash and cash equivalents of change +92% ( +92 % ) is - 15% ( 15 % ) ; The cash and cash equivalents of 2015* $ -12896 ( 12896 ) is $ 2310 ;

net earnings ( loss ) attributable to devon the cash and cash equivalents of 2017 $ 898 is $ 2673 ; the cash and cash equivalents of change +185% ( +185 % ) is +36% ( +36 % ) ; the cash and cash equivalents of 2016* $ -1056 ( 1056 ) is $ 1959 ; the cash and cash equivalents of change +92% ( +92 % ) is - 15% ( 15 % ) ; the cash and cash equivalents of 2015* $ -12896 ( 12896 ) is $ 2310 ;

Answer: 3.57

Question: what is the ratio of operating cash flow to total debt in 2016?

Answer: 6.77

Answer: 6.77


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the ratio of operating cash flow to total debt in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6.77.

Rejected response: 3.57.

Question: what is the ratio of operating cash flow to total debt in 2016?

Answer: 6.77

net earnings ( loss ) attributable to devon the operating cash flow of 2017 $ 898 is $ 2909 ; the operating cash flow of change +185% ( +185 % ) is +94% ( +94 % ) ; the operating cash flow of 2016* $ -1056 ( 1056 ) is $ 1500 ; the operating cash flow of change +92% ( +92 % ) is - 69% ( 69 % ) ; the operating cash flow of 2015* $ -12896 ( 12896 ) is $ 4898 ;

net earnings ( loss ) attributable to devon the cash and cash equivalents of 2017 $ 898 is $ 2673 ; the cash and cash equivalents of change +185% ( +185 % ) is +36% ( +36 % ) ; the cash and cash equivalents of 2016* $ -1056 ( 1056 ) is $ 1959 ; the cash and cash equivalents of change +92% ( +92 % ) is - 15% ( 15 % ) ; the cash and cash equivalents of 2015* $ -12896 ( 12896 ) is $ 2310 ;

net earnings ( loss ) attributable to devon the total debt of 2017 $ 898 is $ 10406 ; the total debt of change +185% ( +185 % ) is +2% ( +2 % ) ; the total debt of 2016* $ -1056 ( 1056 ) is $ 10154 ; the total debt of change +92% ( +92 % ) is - 22% ( 22 % ) ; the total debt of 2015* $ -12896 ( 12896 ) is $ 13032 ;

Answer: 6.77

Question: what is the ratio of operating cash flow to total debt in 2017?

Answer: 3.57

Explanation: this is how many years it would take to repay the debt at existing cash flow with no new debt .

Answer: 3.57


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits between 2008 and 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 127.

Rejected response: 359.

IP || what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: 127

in millions the balance at december 31 of 2009 is $ -308 ( 308 ) ; the balance at december 31 of 2008 is $ -435 ( 435 ) ; the balance at december 31 of 2007 is $ -794 ( 794 ) ;

during 2009 , unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $ 127 million .

a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the year ending december 31 , 2009 and 2008 is as follows : in millions 2009 2008 2007 .

in millions the balance at january 1 of 2009 is $ -435 ( 435 ) ; the balance at january 1 of 2008 is $ -794 ( 794 ) ; the balance at january 1 of 2007 is -919 ( 919 ) ;

included in the balance at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 are $ 56 million and $ 9 million , respectively , for tax positions for which the ultimate benefits are highly certain , but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such benefits .

Answer: 127

Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits between 2007 and 2008?

Answer: 359

Answer: 359


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits between 2007 and 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 359.

Rejected response: 127.

Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits between 2007 and 2008?

Answer: 359

in millions the balance at january 1 of 2009 is $ -435 ( 435 ) ; the balance at january 1 of 2008 is $ -794 ( 794 ) ; the balance at january 1 of 2007 is -919 ( 919 ) ;

in millions the balance at december 31 of 2009 is $ -308 ( 308 ) ; the balance at december 31 of 2008 is $ -435 ( 435 ) ; the balance at december 31 of 2007 is $ -794 ( 794 ) ;

included in the balance at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 are $ 56 million and $ 9 million , respectively , for tax positions for which the ultimate benefits are highly certain , but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such benefits .

Answer: 359

Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: 127

Answer: 127


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the effect in difference of average borrowing rate due to the use of swaps in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.1%.

Rejected response: 2.2%.

MS || what was the effect in difference of average borrowing rate due to the use of swaps <TIME>?

Question: what was the effect in difference of average borrowing rate due to the use of swaps in 2012?

Answer: 2.1%

the weighted average coupon of long-term borrowings at period-end ( 1 ) of 2013 is 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) ; the weighted average coupon of long-term borrowings at period-end ( 1 ) of 2012 is 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) ; the weighted average coupon of long-term borrowings at period-end ( 1 ) of 2011 is 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) ;

the effective average borrowing rate for long-term borrowings after swaps at period-end ( 1 ) of 2013 is 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) ; the effective average borrowing rate for long-term borrowings after swaps at period-end ( 1 ) of 2012 is 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) ; the effective average borrowing rate for long-term borrowings after swaps at period-end ( 1 ) of 2011 is 1.9% ( 1.9 % ) ;

the company 2019s use of swaps for asset and liability management affected its effective average borrowing rate as follows: .

included in the company 2019s long-term borrowings are subordinated notes of $ 9275 million having a contractual weighted average coupon of 4.69% ( 4.69 % ) at december 31 , 2013 and $ 5845 million having a weighted average coupon of 4.81% ( 4.81 % ) at december 31 , 2012 .

Answer: 2.1%

Question: what was the effect in difference of average borrowing rate due to the use of swaps in 2013?

Answer: 2.2%

Answer: 2.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the effect in difference of average borrowing rate due to the use of swaps in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.2%.

Rejected response: 2.1%.

Question: what was the effect in difference of average borrowing rate due to the use of swaps in 2013?

Answer: 2.2%

included in the company 2019s long-term borrowings are subordinated notes of $ 9275 million having a contractual weighted average coupon of 4.69% ( 4.69 % ) at december 31 , 2013 and $ 5845 million having a weighted average coupon of 4.81% ( 4.81 % ) at december 31 , 2012 .

the weighted average coupon of long-term borrowings at period-end ( 1 ) of 2013 is 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) ; the weighted average coupon of long-term borrowings at period-end ( 1 ) of 2012 is 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) ; the weighted average coupon of long-term borrowings at period-end ( 1 ) of 2011 is 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) ;

the effective average borrowing rate for long-term borrowings after swaps at period-end ( 1 ) of 2013 is 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) ; the effective average borrowing rate for long-term borrowings after swaps at period-end ( 1 ) of 2012 is 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) ; the effective average borrowing rate for long-term borrowings after swaps at period-end ( 1 ) of 2011 is 1.9% ( 1.9 % ) ;

Answer: 2.2%

Question: what was the effect in difference of average borrowing rate due to the use of swaps in 2012?

Answer: 2.1%

Answer: 2.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in investment income ( loss ) net from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -389.

Rejected response: -512.

CMCSA || what was the percentage change in investment income ( loss ) net <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in investment income ( loss ) net from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -389

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the investment income ( loss ) net of 2008 is $ 89 ; the investment income ( loss ) net of 2007 is $ 601 ; the investment income ( loss ) net of 2006 is $ 990 ;

we will account for our investment under the equity method and record our share of net income or loss one quarter in arrears .

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the gains on sales and exchanges of investments net of 2008 is $ 8 ; the gains on sales and exchanges of investments net of 2007 is $ 151 ; the gains on sales and exchanges of investments net of 2006 is $ 733 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the investment impairment losses of 2008 is -28 ( 28 ) ; the investment impairment losses of 2007 is -4 ( 4 ) ; the investment impairment losses of 2006 is -4 ( 4 ) ;

Answer: -389

Question: what was the percentage change in investment income ( loss ) net from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -512

Answer: -512


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in investment income ( loss ) net from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -512.

Rejected response: -389.

Question: what was the percentage change in investment income ( loss ) net from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -512

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the gains on sales and exchanges of investments net of 2008 is $ 8 ; the gains on sales and exchanges of investments net of 2007 is $ 151 ; the gains on sales and exchanges of investments net of 2006 is $ 733 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the investment impairment losses of 2008 is -28 ( 28 ) ; the investment impairment losses of 2007 is -4 ( 4 ) ; the investment impairment losses of 2006 is -4 ( 4 ) ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the investment income ( loss ) net of 2008 is $ 89 ; the investment income ( loss ) net of 2007 is $ 601 ; the investment income ( loss ) net of 2006 is $ 990 ;

Answer: -512

Question: what was the percentage change in investment income ( loss ) net from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -389

Answer: -389


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total inventories was comprised of raw materials and packaging in 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 46%.

Rejected response: 49%.

CAG || what percent of total inventories was comprised of raw materials and packaging <TIME>?

Question: what percent of total inventories was comprised of raw materials and packaging in 2006?

Answer: 46%

the raw materials and packaging of 2007 is $ 1154.2 ; the raw materials and packaging of 2006 is $ 985.0 ;

the total of 2007 is $ 2348.5 ; the total of 2006 is $ 2130.6 ;

inventories the major classes of inventories are as follows: .

raw materials and packaging includes grain , fertilizer , crude oil , and other trading and merchandising inventory of $ 691.0 million and $ 542.1 million as of the end of fiscal year 2007 and 2006 , respectively. .

Answer: 46%

Question: what percent of total inventories was comprised of raw materials and packaging in 2007?

Answer: 49%

Answer: 49%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total inventories was comprised of raw materials and packaging in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 49%.

Rejected response: 46%.

Question: what percent of total inventories was comprised of raw materials and packaging in 2007?

Answer: 49%

the raw materials and packaging of 2007 is $ 1154.2 ; the raw materials and packaging of 2006 is $ 985.0 ;

the total of 2007 is $ 2348.5 ; the total of 2006 is $ 2130.6 ;

raw materials and packaging includes grain , fertilizer , crude oil , and other trading and merchandising inventory of $ 691.0 million and $ 542.1 million as of the end of fiscal year 2007 and 2006 , respectively. .

Answer: 49%

Question: what percent of total inventories was comprised of raw materials and packaging in 2006?

Answer: 46%

Answer: 46%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the average dividend or cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method in millions in 2002?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2003-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17.5.

Rejected response: 18.8.

AES || what was the average dividend or cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method in millions <TIME>?

Question: what was the average dividend or cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method in millions in 2002?

Answer: 17.5

the subsidiaries of 2003 is $ 807 ; the subsidiaries of 2002 is $ 771 ; the subsidiaries of 2001 is $ 1038 ;

the affiliates of 2003 is 43 ; the affiliates of 2002 is 44 ; the affiliates of 2001 is 21 ;

dividends from subsidiaries and affiliates cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method were as follows ( in millions ) : .

Answer: 17.5

Question: what was the average dividend or cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method in millions in 2003?

Answer: 18.8

Answer: 18.8


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the average dividend or cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method in millions in 2003?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18.8.

Rejected response: 17.5.

Question: what was the average dividend or cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method in millions in 2003?

Answer: 18.8

dividends from subsidiaries and affiliates cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method were as follows ( in millions ) : .

the subsidiaries of 2003 is $ 807 ; the subsidiaries of 2002 is $ 771 ; the subsidiaries of 2001 is $ 1038 ;

the affiliates of 2003 is 43 ; the affiliates of 2002 is 44 ; the affiliates of 2001 is 21 ;

Answer: 18.8

Question: what was the average dividend or cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method in millions in 2002?

Answer: 17.5

Answer: 17.5


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: as a percent of total revenues net of interest expense what was non-interest revenue in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 91%.

Rejected response: 97%.

C || as a percent of total revenues net of interest expense what was non-interest revenue <TIME>?

Question: as a percent of total revenues net of interest expense what was non-interest revenue in 2007?

Answer: 91%

in millions of dollars the non-interest revenue of 2009 is 14703 ; the non-interest revenue of 2008 is 7199 ; the non-interest revenue of 2007 is 9751 ; the non-interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is nm ; the non-interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is -26 ( 26 ) ;

in millions of dollars the total revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ 15135 ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ 8423 ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ 10659 ; the total revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is 80% ( 80 % ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is ( 21 ) % ( % ) ;

in millions of dollars The net interest revenue of 2009 is $ 432 ; The net interest revenue of 2008 is $ 1224 ; The net interest revenue of 2007 is $ 908 ; The net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 65 ) % ( % ) ; The net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is 35% ( 35 % ) ;

in millions of dollars the net interest revenue of 2009 is $ 432 ; the net interest revenue of 2008 is $ 1224 ; the net interest revenue of 2007 is $ 908 ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 65 ) % ( % ) ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is 35% ( 35 % ) ;

Answer: 91%

Question: as a percent of total revenues net of interest expense what was non-interest revenue in 2009?

Answer: 97%

Answer: 97%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: as a percent of total revenues net of interest expense what was non-interest revenue in 2009?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 97%.

Rejected response: 91%.

Question: as a percent of total revenues net of interest expense what was non-interest revenue in 2009?

Answer: 97%

in millions of dollars the net interest revenue of 2009 is $ 432 ; the net interest revenue of 2008 is $ 1224 ; the net interest revenue of 2007 is $ 908 ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 65 ) % ( % ) ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is 35% ( 35 % ) ;

in millions of dollars the non-interest revenue of 2009 is 14703 ; the non-interest revenue of 2008 is 7199 ; the non-interest revenue of 2007 is 9751 ; the non-interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is nm ; the non-interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is -26 ( 26 ) ;

in millions of dollars the total revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ 15135 ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ 8423 ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ 10659 ; the total revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is 80% ( 80 % ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is ( 21 ) % ( % ) ;

Answer: 97%

Question: as a percent of total revenues net of interest expense what was non-interest revenue in 2007?

Answer: 91%

Answer: 91%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2013 to 2014 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -4.1.

Rejected response: -7.7.

LMT || what was the change in weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations <TIME> , in millions?

Question: what was the change in weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2013 to 2014 , in millions?

Answer: -4.1

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2015 is 314.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2014 is 322.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2013 is 326.5 ;

The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2015 is 310.3 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2014 is 316.8 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2013 is 320.9 ;

note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .

2015 and 2014 was $ 1.5 billion and $ 1.3 billion .

the computation of diluted earnings per common share excluded 2.4 million stock options for the year ended december 31 , 2013 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive , primarily due to their exercise prices exceeding the average market prices of our common stock during the respective periods .

Answer: -4.1

Question: what was the change in weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2014 to 2015 , in millions?

Answer: -7.7

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2015 is 310.3 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2014 is 316.8 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2013 is 320.9 ;

Answer: -7.7


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2014 to 2015 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -7.7.

Rejected response: -4.1.

Question: what was the change in weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2014 to 2015 , in millions?

Answer: -7.7

2015 and 2014 was $ 1.5 billion and $ 1.3 billion .

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2015 is 310.3 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2014 is 316.8 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2013 is 320.9 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2015 is 314.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2014 is 322.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2013 is 326.5 ;

Answer: -7.7

Question: what was the change in weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2013 to 2014 , in millions?

Answer: -4.1

the computation of diluted earnings per common share excluded 2.4 million stock options for the year ended december 31 , 2013 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive , primarily due to their exercise prices exceeding the average market prices of our common stock during the respective periods .

Answer: -4.1


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what portion of state operating loss carryforwards expire between 2007 and 2011?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17.2%.

Rejected response: 39.3%.

AMT || what portion of state operating loss carryforwards expire <TIME>?

Question: what portion of state operating loss carryforwards expire between 2007 and 2011?

Answer: 17.2%

years ended december 31 , the 2007 to 2011 of federal is ; the 2007 to 2011 of state is $ 438967 ;

years ended december 31 , the total of federal is $ 2093683 ; the total of state is $ 2548612 ;

if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .

years ended december 31, the 2017 to 2021 of federal is $ 617039 ; the 2017 to 2021 of state is 1001789 ;

Answer: 17.2%

Question: what portion of state operating loss carryforwards expire between 2017 and 2021?

Answer: 39.3%

years ended december 31 , the 2017 to 2021 of federal is $ 617039 ; the 2017 to 2021 of state is 1001789 ;

Answer: 39.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what portion of state operating loss carryforwards expire between 2017 and 2021?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2022-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 39.3%.

Rejected response: 17.2%.

Question: what portion of state operating loss carryforwards expire between 2017 and 2021?

Answer: 39.3%

years ended december 31 , the 2007 to 2011 of federal is ; the 2007 to 2011 of state is $ 438967 ;

years ended december 31 , the 2017 to 2021 of federal is $ 617039 ; the 2017 to 2021 of state is 1001789 ;

years ended december 31 , the total of federal is $ 2093683 ; the total of state is $ 2548612 ;

Answer: 39.3%

Question: what portion of state operating loss carryforwards expire between 2007 and 2011?

Answer: 17.2%

years ended december 31, the 2017 to 2021 of federal is $ 617039 ; the 2017 to 2021 of state is 1001789 ;

Answer: 17.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of net cash from operating activities was derived from non-cash operating activities in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 101%.

Rejected response: 45%.

UPS || what percentage of net cash from operating activities was derived from non-cash operating activities <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of net cash from operating activities was derived from non-cash operating activities in 2012?

Answer: 101%

the non-cash operating activities ( a ) of 2013 is 3318 ; the non-cash operating activities ( a ) of 2012 is 7313 ; the non-cash operating activities ( a ) of 2011 is 4578 ;

the net cash from operating activities of 2013 is $ 7304 ; the net cash from operating activities of 2012 is $ 7216 ; the net cash from operating activities of 2011 is $ 7073 ;

The other operating activities of 2013 is -140 ( 140 ) ; The other operating activities of 2012 is -119 ( 119 ) ; The other operating activities of 2011 is -97 ( 97 ) ;

and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : .

Answer: 101%

Question: what percentage of net cash from operating activities was derived from non-cash operating activities in 2013?

Answer: 45%

Answer: 45%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of net cash from operating activities was derived from non-cash operating activities in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 45%.

Rejected response: 101%.

Question: what percentage of net cash from operating activities was derived from non-cash operating activities in 2013?

Answer: 45%

and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : .

the non-cash operating activities ( a ) of 2013 is 3318 ; the non-cash operating activities ( a ) of 2012 is 7313 ; the non-cash operating activities ( a ) of 2011 is 4578 ;

the net cash from operating activities of 2013 is $ 7304 ; the net cash from operating activities of 2012 is $ 7216 ; the net cash from operating activities of 2011 is $ 7073 ;

Answer: 45%

Question: what percentage of net cash from operating activities was derived from non-cash operating activities in 2012?

Answer: 101%

Answer: 101%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: how is the cash flow of entergy mississippi affected by the balance in money pool from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18576.

Rejected response: 87041.

ETR || how is the cash flow of entergy mississippi affected by the balance in money pool <TIME>?

Question: how is the cash flow of entergy mississippi affected by the balance in money pool from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 18576

in may 2007 , $ 6.6 million of entergy mississippi's receivable from the money pool was replaced by a note receivable from entergy new orleans .

see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .

entergy mississippi's receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

2008 the ( in thousands ) of 2007 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2006 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2005 is ( in thousands ) ;

Answer: 18576

Question: how is the cash flow of entergy mississippi affected by the balance in money pool from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 87041

Answer: 87041


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: how is the cash flow of entergy mississippi affected by the balance in money pool from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 87041.

Rejected response: 18576.

Question: how is the cash flow of entergy mississippi affected by the balance in money pool from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 87041

entergy mississippi's receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

2008 the ( in thousands ) of 2007 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2006 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2005 is ( in thousands ) ;

Answer: 87041

Question: how is the cash flow of entergy mississippi affected by the balance in money pool from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 18576

Answer: 18576


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in interest expense from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6.5%.

Rejected response: 80.8%.

UAA || what is the percentage change in interest expense <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in interest expense from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 6.5%

amortization expense , which is included in selling , general and administrative expenses , was $ 13.0 million , $ 13.9 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

at december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company determined that its goodwill and indefinite- lived intangible assets were not impaired .

the following is the estimated amortization expense for the company 2019s intangible assets as of december 31 , 2016 : ( in thousands ) .

2017 the amortization expense of intangible assets of $ 10509 is $ 58370 ;

Answer: 6.5%

Question: what is the percentage change in interest expense from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 80.8%

interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements .

included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

Answer: 80.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in interest expense from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 80.8%.

Rejected response: 6.5%.

Question: what is the percentage change in interest expense from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 80.8%

interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements .

included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

Answer: 80.8%

Question: what is the percentage change in interest expense from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 6.5%

amortization expense , which is included in selling , general and administrative expenses , was $ 13.0 million , $ 13.9 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

the following is the estimated amortization expense for the company 2019s intangible assets as of december 31 , 2016 : ( in thousands ) .

2017 the amortization expense of intangible assets of $ 10509 is $ 58370 ;

Answer: 6.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in total fee revenue in 2000?
Reference time interval: 2000-01-01 00:00:00 to 2001-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 15.3%.

Rejected response: 6.3%.

STT || what is the growth rate in total fee revenue <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in total fee revenue in 2000?

Answer: 15.3%

( dollars in millions ) the total fee revenue of 2001 ( 1 ) is $ 2832 ; the total fee revenue of 2000 is $ 2665 ; the total fee revenue of 1999 ( 2 ) is $ 2312 ; the total fee revenue of change 00-01 is 6 ; the total fee revenue of adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 ) is 8 ;

adjusted for the formation of citistreet , the growth in fee revenue was 8% ( 8 % ) .

fee revenue total operating fee revenuewas $ 2.8 billion in 2001 , compared to $ 2.7 billion in 2000 , an increase of 6% ( 6 % ) .

state street estimates , based on a study conducted in 2000 , that a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in worldwide equity values would cause a corresponding change in state street 2019s total revenue of approximately 2% ( 2 % ) .

Answer: 15.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in total fee revenue in 2001?

Answer: 6.3%

Answer: 6.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in total fee revenue in 2001?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6.3%.

Rejected response: 15.3%.

Question: what is the growth rate in total fee revenue in 2001?

Answer: 6.3%

fee revenue total operating fee revenuewas $ 2.8 billion in 2001 , compared to $ 2.7 billion in 2000 , an increase of 6% ( 6 % ) .

adjusted for the formation of citistreet , the growth in fee revenue was 8% ( 8 % ) .

( dollars in millions ) the total fee revenue of 2001 ( 1 ) is $ 2832 ; the total fee revenue of 2000 is $ 2665 ; the total fee revenue of 1999 ( 2 ) is $ 2312 ; the total fee revenue of change 00-01 is 6 ; the total fee revenue of adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 ) is 8 ;

Answer: 6.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in total fee revenue in 2000?

Answer: 15.3%

state street estimates , based on a study conducted in 2000 , that a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in worldwide equity values would cause a corresponding change in state street 2019s total revenue of approximately 2% ( 2 % ) .

Answer: 15.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the operating margin for space systems in 2001?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5.2%.

Rejected response: 6%.

LMT || what was the operating margin for space systems <TIME>?

Question: what was the operating margin for space systems in 2001?

Answer: 5.2%

( in millions ) the net sales of 2002 is $ 7384 ; the net sales of 2001 is $ 6836 ; the net sales of 2000 is $ 7339 ;

( in millions ) the operating profit of 2002 is 443 ; the operating profit of 2001 is 360 ; the operating profit of 2000 is 345 ;

net sales for space systems increased by 8% ( 8 % ) in 2002 compared to 2001 .

lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2002 space systems space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2002 2001 2000 .

Answer: 5.2%

Question: what was the operating margin for space systems in 2002?

Answer: 6%

Answer: 6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the operating margin for space systems in 2002?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2003-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6%.

Rejected response: 5.2%.

Question: what was the operating margin for space systems in 2002?

Answer: 6%

lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2002 space systems space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2002 2001 2000 .

( in millions ) the net sales of 2002 is $ 7384 ; the net sales of 2001 is $ 6836 ; the net sales of 2000 is $ 7339 ;

( in millions ) the operating profit of 2002 is 443 ; the operating profit of 2001 is 360 ; the operating profit of 2000 is 345 ;

Answer: 6%

Question: what was the operating margin for space systems in 2001?

Answer: 5.2%

Answer: 5.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the annual interest expense related to the series first mortgage bonds due august 2008 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.2.

Rejected response: 16.2.

ETR || what is the annual interest expense related to the series first mortgage bonds due august <TIME> , in millions?

Question: what is the annual interest expense related to the series first mortgage bonds due august 2008 , in millions?

Answer: 1.2

the proceeds from these issuances were used to redeem , prior to maturity , $ 30 million of 7% ( 7 % ) series first mortgage bonds due july 2008 , $ 40 million of 8% ( 8 % ) series bonds due march 2006 , and $ 30 million of 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) series first mortgage bonds due march 2004 .

in july 2003 , entergy new orleans issued $ 30 million of 3.875% ( 3.875 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2008 and $ 70 million of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2013 .

financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 7.0 million in 2004 primarily due to the costs and expenses related to refinancing $ 75 million of long-term debt in 2004 and an increase of $ 2.2 million in common stock dividends paid .

Answer: 1.2

Question: what is the annual interest expense related to the series first mortgage bonds due august 2013 , in millions?

Answer: 16.2

in july 2008 , entergy arkansas issued $ 300 million of 5.40% ( 5.40 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2013 .

management's financial discussion and analysis financing alternatives for any such spending , and future spending estimates could change based on the results of this continuing analysis .

entergy arkansas used a portion of the net proceeds to fund the purchase of the ouachita power plant on september 30 , 2008 , and the remaining net proceeds will be used to fund improvements relating to the ouachita power plant and for general corporate purposes .

see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool. .

Answer: 16.2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the annual interest expense related to the series first mortgage bonds due august 2013 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 16.2.

Rejected response: 1.2.

Question: what is the annual interest expense related to the series first mortgage bonds due august 2013 , in millions?

Answer: 16.2

in july 2008 , entergy arkansas issued $ 300 million of 5.40% ( 5.40 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2013 .

entergy arkansas used a portion of the net proceeds to fund the purchase of the ouachita power plant on september 30 , 2008 , and the remaining net proceeds will be used to fund improvements relating to the ouachita power plant and for general corporate purposes .

see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool. .

Answer: 16.2

Question: what is the annual interest expense related to the series first mortgage bonds due august 2008 , in millions?

Answer: 1.2

in july 2003 , entergy new orleans issued $ 30 million of 3.875% ( 3.875 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2008 and $ 70 million of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2013 .

the proceeds from these issuances were used to redeem , prior to maturity , $ 30 million of 7% ( 7 % ) series first mortgage bonds due july 2008 , $ 40 million of 8% ( 8 % ) series bonds due march 2006 , and $ 30 million of 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) series first mortgage bonds due march 2004 .

Answer: 1.2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total other current assets in 2007 was comprised of nand flash memory prepayments?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11%.

Rejected response: 9%.

AAPL || what percentage of total other current assets <TIME> was comprised of nand flash memory prepayments?

Question: what percentage of total other current assets in 2007 was comprised of nand flash memory prepayments?

Answer: 11%

the nand flash memory prepayments of 2007 is 417 ; the nand flash memory prepayments of 2006 is 208 ;

the total other current assets of 2007 is $ 3805 ; the total other current assets of 2006 is $ 2270 ;

The other current assets of 2007 is 996 ; The other current assets of 2006 is 469 ;

the other current assets of 2007 is 996 ; the other current assets of 2006 is 469 ;

Answer: 11%

Question: what percentage of total other current assets in 2006 was comprised of nand flash memory prepayments?

Answer: 9%

Answer: 9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total other current assets in 2006 was comprised of nand flash memory prepayments?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9%.

Rejected response: 11%.

Question: what percentage of total other current assets in 2006 was comprised of nand flash memory prepayments?

Answer: 9%

the nand flash memory prepayments of 2007 is 417 ; the nand flash memory prepayments of 2006 is 208 ;

the other current assets of 2007 is 996 ; the other current assets of 2006 is 469 ;

the total other current assets of 2007 is $ 3805 ; the total other current assets of 2006 is $ 2270 ;

Answer: 9%

Question: what percentage of total other current assets in 2007 was comprised of nand flash memory prepayments?

Answer: 11%

Answer: 11%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca for the five year period ended december 31 , 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -46.44%.

Rejected response: 33.81%.

DISCA || what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca for the five year period ended december 31 , <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca for the five year period ended december 31 , 2018?

Answer: -46.44%

subtract(53.56, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the disca of december 312013 is $ 100.00 ; the disca of december 312014 is $ 74.58 ; the disca of december 312015 is $ 57.76 ; the disca of december 312016 is $ 59.34 ; the disca of december 312017 is $ 48.45 ; the disca of december 312018 is $ 53.56 ;

december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

and excluding both acquired companies for the entire five year period .

the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2013 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 .

the discb of december 312013 is $ 100.00 ; the discb of december 312014 is $ 80.56 ; the discb of december 312015 is $ 58.82 ; the discb of december 312016 is $ 63.44 ; the discb of december 312017 is $ 53.97 ; the discb of december 312018 is $ 72.90 ;

Answer: -46.44%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca for the five year period ended december 31 , 2016?

Answer: 33.81%

subtract(133.81, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the disca of december 312011 is $ 100.00 ; the disca of december 312012 is $ 154.94 ; the disca of december 312013 is $ 220.70 ; the disca of december 312014 is $ 168.17 ; the disca of december 312015 is $ 130.24 ; the disca of december 312016 is $ 133.81 ;

the selected statement of operations information for each of the two years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 and the selected balance sheet information as of december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 have been derived from financial statements not included in this annual report on form 10-k .

the discb of december 312011 is $ 100.00 ; the discb of december 312012 is $ 150.40 ; the discb of december 312013 is $ 217.35 ; the discb of december 312014 is $ 175.04 ; the discb of december 312015 is $ 127.80 ; the discb of december 312016 is $ 137.83 ;

Answer: 33.81%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca for the five year period ended december 31 , 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 33.81%.

Rejected response: -46.44%.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca for the five year period ended december 31 , 2016?

Answer: 33.81%

subtract(133.81, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the disca of december 312011 is $ 100.00 ; the disca of december 312012 is $ 154.94 ; the disca of december 312013 is $ 220.70 ; the disca of december 312014 is $ 168.17 ; the disca of december 312015 is $ 130.24 ; the disca of december 312016 is $ 133.81 ;

the discb of december 312011 is $ 100.00 ; the discb of december 312012 is $ 150.40 ; the discb of december 312013 is $ 217.35 ; the discb of december 312014 is $ 175.04 ; the discb of december 312015 is $ 127.80 ; the discb of december 312016 is $ 137.83 ;

Answer: 33.81%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca for the five year period ended december 31 , 2018?

Answer: -46.44%

subtract(53.56, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2013 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 .

the disca of december 312013 is $ 100.00 ; the disca of december 312014 is $ 74.58 ; the disca of december 312015 is $ 57.76 ; the disca of december 312016 is $ 59.34 ; the disca of december 312017 is $ 48.45 ; the disca of december 312018 is $ 53.56 ;

the discb of december 312013 is $ 100.00 ; the discb of december 312014 is $ 80.56 ; the discb of december 312015 is $ 58.82 ; the discb of december 312016 is $ 63.44 ; the discb of december 312017 is $ 53.97 ; the discb of december 312018 is $ 72.90 ;

Answer: -46.44%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the debt-to-asset ratio in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.5%.

Rejected response: 2.7%.

GS || what is the debt-to-asset ratio <TIME>?

Question: what is the debt-to-asset ratio in 2011?

Answer: 2.5%

in millions the debt of as of december 2012 is 25386 ; the debt of as of december 2011 is 23311 ;

in millions the total assets of as of december 2012 is $ 938555 ; the total assets of as of december 2011 is $ 923225 ;

we also consider any potential future constraints , such as limits on our ability to grow our asset base in the absence of appropriate funding .

the table below presents a summary of this balance sheet allocation. .

Answer: 2.5%

Question: what is the debt-to-asset ratio in 2012?

Answer: 2.7%

Answer: 2.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the debt-to-asset ratio in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.7%.

Rejected response: 2.5%.

Question: what is the debt-to-asset ratio in 2012?

Answer: 2.7%

the table below presents a summary of this balance sheet allocation. .

in millions the debt of as of december 2012 is 25386 ; the debt of as of december 2011 is 23311 ;

in millions the total assets of as of december 2012 is $ 938555 ; the total assets of as of december 2011 is $ 923225 ;

Answer: 2.7%

Question: what is the debt-to-asset ratio in 2011?

Answer: 2.5%

Answer: 2.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2015 , and thereafter are due in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: 17%.

FIS || what percentage of future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , <TIME> , and thereafter are due <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2015 , and thereafter are due in 2013?

Answer: 13%

future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2015 , and thereafter in the aggregate , are as follows ( in millions ) : .

Answer: 13%

Question: what percentage of future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2015 , and thereafter are due in 2012?

Answer: 17%

Answer: 17%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2015 , and thereafter are due in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17%.

Rejected response: 13%.

Question: what percentage of future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2015 , and thereafter are due in 2012?

Answer: 17%

Answer: 17%

Question: what percentage of future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2015 , and thereafter are due in 2013?

Answer: 13%

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net number of stores that opened during 2010?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 105.

Rejected response: 91.

AAP || what is the net number of stores that opened <TIME>?

Question: what is the net number of stores that opened during 2010?

Answer: 105

the beginning stores of 2011 is 3369 ; the beginning stores of 2010 is 3264 ; the beginning stores of 2009 is 3243 ; the beginning stores of 2008 is 3153 ; the beginning stores of 2007 is 2995 ;

the new stores ( 1 ) of 2011 is 95 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2010 is 110 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2009 is 75 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2008 is 109 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2007 is 175 ;

the following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years : beginning stores new stores ( 1 ) stores closed ending stores ( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores .

the ending stores of 2011 is 3460 ; the ending stores of 2010 is 3369 ; the ending stores of 2009 is 3264 ; the ending stores of 2008 is 3243 ; the ending stores of 2007 is 3153 ;

Answer: 105

Question: what is the net number of stores that opened during 2011?

Answer: 91

Answer: 91


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net number of stores that opened during 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 91.

Rejected response: 105.

Question: what is the net number of stores that opened during 2011?

Answer: 91

the beginning stores of 2011 is 3369 ; the beginning stores of 2010 is 3264 ; the beginning stores of 2009 is 3243 ; the beginning stores of 2008 is 3153 ; the beginning stores of 2007 is 2995 ;

the new stores ( 1 ) of 2011 is 95 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2010 is 110 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2009 is 75 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2008 is 109 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2007 is 175 ;

the ending stores of 2011 is 3460 ; the ending stores of 2010 is 3369 ; the ending stores of 2009 is 3264 ; the ending stores of 2008 is 3243 ; the ending stores of 2007 is 3153 ;

Answer: 91

Question: what is the net number of stores that opened during 2010?

Answer: 105

Answer: 105


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -0.6%.

Rejected response: 7.3%.

LMT || what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -0.6%

our contributions were $ 658 million in 2018 , $ 613 million in 2017 and $ 617 million in 2016 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock .

under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents .

as a result of these contributions , we do not expect to make contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2019 .

the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2019 is $ 2350 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2020 is $ 2390 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2021 is $ 2470 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2022 is $ 2550 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2023 is $ 2610 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2024 2013 2028 is $ 13670 ;

Answer: -0.6%

Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: 7.3%

we made contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions .

Answer: 7.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2017 to 2018?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7.3%.

Rejected response: -0.6%.

Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: 7.3%

we made contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions .

the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2019 is $ 2350 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2020 is $ 2390 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2021 is $ 2470 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2022 is $ 2550 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2023 is $ 2610 ; the qualified defined benefit pension plans of 2024 2013 2028 is $ 13670 ;

our contributions were $ 658 million in 2018 , $ 613 million in 2017 and $ 617 million in 2016 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock .

Answer: 7.3%

Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -0.6%

as a result of these contributions , we do not expect to make contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2019 .

Answer: -0.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by how much did asset retirement liability increase from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 25.6%.

Rejected response: 42.7%.

AAPL || by how much did asset retirement liability increase <TIME>?

Question: by how much did asset retirement liability increase from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 25.6%

asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004 the asset retirement liability as of september 24 2005 of $ 8.2 is $ 11.7 ;

asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004 the additional asset retirement obligations recognized of $ 8.2 is 2.5 ;

asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004 the asset retirement liability as of september 30 2006 of $ 8.2 is $ 14.7 ;

Answer: 25.6%

Question: by how much did asset retirement liability increase from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 42.7%

the company did not recognize any goodwill or intangible asset impairment charges in 2006 , 2005 , or 2004 .

asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004 The asset retirement liability as of september 30 2006 of $ 8.2 is $ 14.7 ;

asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004 the asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004 of $ 8.2 is $ 8.2 ;

Answer: 42.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by how much did asset retirement liability increase from 2004 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 42.7%.

Rejected response: 25.6%.

Question: by how much did asset retirement liability increase from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 42.7%

asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004 the asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004 of $ 8.2 is $ 8.2 ;

asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004 the asset retirement liability as of september 24 2005 of $ 8.2 is $ 11.7 ;

asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004 the asset retirement liability as of september 30 2006 of $ 8.2 is $ 14.7 ;

Answer: 42.7%

Question: by how much did asset retirement liability increase from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 25.6%

asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004 the additional asset retirement obligations recognized of $ 8.2 is 2.5 ;

Answer: 25.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the average net sales from 2011 to 2013
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 14479.

Rejected response: 8155.3.

LMT || what was the average net sales <TIME>

Question: what was the average net sales from 2011 to 2013

Answer: 14479

the net sales of 2013 is $ 14123 ; the net sales of 2012 is $ 14953 ; the net sales of 2011 is $ 14362 ;

2013 compared to 2012 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2013 decreased $ 830 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 .

adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 75 million lower for 2013 compared to 2012 compared to 2011 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 591 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 .

the operating profit of 2013 is 1612 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 1699 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 1630 ;

Answer: 14479

Question: what was the average net sales from 2011 to 2013

Answer: 8155.3

the net sales of 2013 is $ 7958 ; the net sales of 2012 is $ 8347 ; the net sales of 2011 is $ 8161 ;

2013 compared to 2012 space systems 2019 net sales for 2013 decreased $ 389 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2012 .

2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 186 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 .

the operating profit of 2013 is 1045 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 1083 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 1063 ;

atomic weapons establishment joint venture represented approximately $ 265 million and $ 285 million , or 24% ( 24 % ) and 27% ( 27 % ) of this segment 2019s operating profit. .

Answer: 8155.3


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the average net sales from 2011 to 2013
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 8155.3.

Rejected response: 14479.

Question: what was the average net sales from 2011 to 2013

Answer: 8155.3

the net sales of 2013 is $ 7958 ; the net sales of 2012 is $ 8347 ; the net sales of 2011 is $ 8161 ;

the operating profit of 2013 is 1045 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 1083 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 1063 ;

atomic weapons establishment joint venture represented approximately $ 265 million and $ 285 million , or 24% ( 24 % ) and 27% ( 27 % ) of this segment 2019s operating profit. .

Answer: 8155.3

Question: what was the average net sales from 2011 to 2013

Answer: 14479

the net sales of 2013 is $ 14123 ; the net sales of 2012 is $ 14953 ; the net sales of 2011 is $ 14362 ;

the operating profit of 2013 is 1612 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 1699 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 1630 ;

adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 75 million lower for 2013 compared to 2012 compared to 2011 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 591 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 .

Answer: 14479


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in net sales metal beverage packaging , europe between 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2%.

Rejected response: -7%.

BLL || what was the percentage change in net sales metal beverage packaging , europe between <TIME> to <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales metal beverage packaging , europe between 2009 to 2010?

Answer: -2%

( $ in millions ) the net sales of 2010 is $ 1697.6 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 1739.5 ; the net sales of 2008 is $ 1868.7 ;

the metal beverage packaging , europe , segment includes metal beverage packaging products manufactured in europe .

( $ in millions ) the total segment earnings of 2010 is $ 209.7 ; the total segment earnings of 2009 is $ 214.8 ; the total segment earnings of 2008 is $ 230.9 ;

Answer: -2%

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales metal beverage packaging , europe between 2008 to 2009?

Answer: -7%

( $ in millions ) the segment earnings of 2010 is $ 212.9 ; the segment earnings of 2009 is $ 214.8 ; the segment earnings of 2008 is $ 230.9 ;

Answer: -7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in net sales metal beverage packaging , europe between 2008 to 2009?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -7%.

Rejected response: -2%.

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales metal beverage packaging , europe between 2008 to 2009?

Answer: -7%

( $ in millions ) the net sales of 2010 is $ 1697.6 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 1739.5 ; the net sales of 2008 is $ 1868.7 ;

( $ in millions ) the segment earnings of 2010 is $ 212.9 ; the segment earnings of 2009 is $ 214.8 ; the segment earnings of 2008 is $ 230.9 ;

( $ in millions ) the total segment earnings of 2010 is $ 209.7 ; the total segment earnings of 2009 is $ 214.8 ; the total segment earnings of 2008 is $ 230.9 ;

Answer: -7%

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales metal beverage packaging , europe between 2009 to 2010?

Answer: -2%

Answer: -2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2016 for entergy louisiana?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.2%.

Rejected response: 7.2%.

ETR || what is the growth rate in net revenue <TIME> for entergy louisiana?

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2016 for entergy louisiana?

Answer: 1.2%

the 2015 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 2408.8 ;

the 2016 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 2438.4 ;

the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to changes in transmission investments , including entergy louisiana 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .

entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense .

Answer: 1.2%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2015 for entergy louisiana?

Answer: 7.2%

the 2014 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 2246.1 ;

entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .

Answer: 7.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2015 for entergy louisiana?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7.2%.

Rejected response: 1.2%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2015 for entergy louisiana?

Answer: 7.2%

the 2014 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 2246.1 ;

the 2015 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 2408.8 ;

Answer: 7.2%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2016 for entergy louisiana?

Answer: 1.2%

entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense .

the 2016 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 2438.4 ;

Answer: 1.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for is&gs in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5.4%.

Rejected response: -5.7%.

LMT || what is the growth rate in net sales for is&gs <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for is&gs in 2011?

Answer: -5.4%

the net sales of 2012 is $ 8846 ; the net sales of 2011 is $ 9381 ; the net sales of 2010 is $ 9921 ;

2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 .

a decrease in net sales from a decline in f-16 and c-130j aircraft deliveries is expected to be partially offset by an increase in net sales volume on f-35 lrip contracts .

the operating profit of 2012 is 808 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 874 ; the operating profit of 2010 is 814 ;

Answer: -5.4%

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for is&gs in 2012?

Answer: -5.7%

Answer: -5.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for is&gs in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5.7%.

Rejected response: -5.4%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for is&gs in 2012?

Answer: -5.7%

the net sales of 2012 is $ 8846 ; the net sales of 2011 is $ 9381 ; the net sales of 2010 is $ 9921 ;

the operating profit of 2012 is 808 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 874 ; the operating profit of 2010 is 814 ;

2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 .

Answer: -5.7%

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for is&gs in 2011?

Answer: -5.4%

Answer: -5.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the principal payment in 2017 as a percentage of the total senior secured transition bonds?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 8.38%.

Rejected response: 9.96%.

ETR || what is the principal payment <TIME> as a percentage of the total senior secured transition bonds?

Question: what is the principal payment in 2017 as a percentage of the total senior secured transition bonds?

Answer: 8.38%

the total senior secured transition bonds of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 329500 ;

with the proceeds , entergy new orleans storm recovery funding purchased from entergy new orleans the storm recovery property , which is the right to recover from customers through a storm recovery charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds .

although the principal amount of each tranche is not due until the dates given above , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding expects to make principal payments on the bonds over the next five years in the amounts of $ 26 million for 2016 , $ 27.6 million for 2017 , $ 29.2 million for 2018 , $ 30.9 million for 2019 , and $ 32.8 million for 2020 .

Answer: 8.38%

Question: what is the principal payment in 2020 as a percentage of the total senior secured transition bonds?

Answer: 9.96%

Answer: 9.96%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the principal payment in 2020 as a percentage of the total senior secured transition bonds?
Reference time interval: 2020-01-01 00:00:00 to 2021-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9.96%.

Rejected response: 8.38%.

Question: what is the principal payment in 2020 as a percentage of the total senior secured transition bonds?

Answer: 9.96%

with the proceeds , entergy new orleans storm recovery funding purchased from entergy new orleans the storm recovery property , which is the right to recover from customers through a storm recovery charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds .

the total senior secured transition bonds of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 329500 ;

although the principal amount of each tranche is not due until the dates given above , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding expects to make principal payments on the bonds over the next five years in the amounts of $ 26 million for 2016 , $ 27.6 million for 2017 , $ 29.2 million for 2018 , $ 30.9 million for 2019 , and $ 32.8 million for 2020 .

Answer: 9.96%

Question: what is the principal payment in 2017 as a percentage of the total senior secured transition bonds?

Answer: 8.38%

Answer: 8.38%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total net revenue was noninterest revenue in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 42%.

Rejected response: 49%.

JPM || what percent of total net revenue was noninterest revenue <TIME>?

Question: what percent of total net revenue was noninterest revenue in 2008?

Answer: 42%

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the noninterest revenue of 2009 is 49282 ; the noninterest revenue of 2008 is 28473 ; the noninterest revenue of 2007 is 44966 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2009 is $ 100434 ; the total net revenue of 2008 is $ 67252 ; the total net revenue of 2007 is $ 71372 ;

2009 compared with 2008 total net revenue was $ 100.4 billion , up by $ 33.2 billion , or 49% ( 49 % ) , from the prior year .

Answer: 42%

Question: what percent of total net revenue was noninterest revenue in 2009?

Answer: 49%

Answer: 49%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total net revenue was noninterest revenue in 2009?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 49%.

Rejected response: 42%.

Question: what percent of total net revenue was noninterest revenue in 2009?

Answer: 49%

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the noninterest revenue of 2009 is 49282 ; the noninterest revenue of 2008 is 28473 ; the noninterest revenue of 2007 is 44966 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2009 is $ 100434 ; the total net revenue of 2008 is $ 67252 ; the total net revenue of 2007 is $ 71372 ;

2009 compared with 2008 total net revenue was $ 100.4 billion , up by $ 33.2 billion , or 49% ( 49 % ) , from the prior year .

Answer: 49%

Question: what percent of total net revenue was noninterest revenue in 2008?

Answer: 42%

Answer: 42%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in net sales from 2000 to 2001?
Reference time interval: 2000-01-01 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -32%.

Rejected response: 45%.

AAPL || what was the percentage change in net sales <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales from 2000 to 2001?

Answer: -32%

the net sales of 2002 is $ 5742 ; the net sales of 2001 is $ 5363 ; the net sales of 2000 is $ 7983 ;

The gross margin percentage of 2002 is 28% ( 28 % ) ; The gross margin percentage of 2001 is 23% ( 23 % ) ; The gross margin percentage of 2000 is 27% ( 27 % ) ;

gross margin declined to 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales in 2001 from 27% ( 27 % ) in 2000 .

further information regarding the company's backlog may be found below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 28 , 2002 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : gross margin increased to 28% ( 28 % ) of net sales in 2002 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2001 .

Answer: -32%

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 45%

the net sales of 2012 is $ 156508 ; the net sales of 2011 is $ 108249 ; the net sales of 2010 is $ 65225 ;

The cost of sales of 2012 is 87846 ; The cost of sales of 2011 is 64431 ; The cost of sales of 2010 is 39541 ;

The gross margin percentage of 2012 is 43.9% ( 43.9 % ) ; The gross margin percentage of 2011 is 40.5% ( 40.5 % ) ; The gross margin percentage of 2010 is 39.4% ( 39.4 % ) ;

$ 43.3 million in 2011 compared to $ 34.1 million in 2010 .

dollar ; partially offset by lower commodity costs .

Answer: 45%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in net sales from 2000 to 2001?
Reference time interval: 2000-01-01 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -32%.

Rejected response: 66%.

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales from 2000 to 2001?

Answer: -32%

further information regarding the company's backlog may be found below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 28 , 2002 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : gross margin increased to 28% ( 28 % ) of net sales in 2002 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2001 .

gross margin declined to 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales in 2001 from 27% ( 27 % ) in 2000 .

the net sales of 2002 is $ 5742 ; the net sales of 2001 is $ 5363 ; the net sales of 2000 is $ 7983 ;

Answer: -32%

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 66%

$ 43.3 million in 2011 compared to $ 34.1 million in 2010 .

the net sales of 2012 is $ 156508 ; the net sales of 2011 is $ 108249 ; the net sales of 2010 is $ 65225 ;

dollar ; partially offset by lower commodity costs .

Answer: 66%