Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2016 what percentage of december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is represented by lease obligations?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12%.

Rejected response: 4%.

IP || <TIME> what percentage of december 31 , <TIME> , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is represented by lease obligations?

Question: in 2016 what percentage of december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is represented by lease obligations?

Answer: 12%

in millions the lease obligations of 2015 is $ 142 ; the lease obligations of 2016 is $ 106 ; the lease obligations of 2017 is $ 84 ; the lease obligations of 2018 is $ 63 ; the lease obligations of 2019 is $ 45 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is $ 91 ;

in millions the total of 2015 is $ 3408 ; the total of 2016 is $ 867 ; the total of 2017 is $ 667 ; the total of 2018 is $ 526 ; the total of 2019 is $ 467 ; the total of thereafter is $ 1781 ;

at december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations were as follows: .

in millions the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2015 is 3266 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2016 is 761 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2017 is 583 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2018 is 463 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2019 is 422 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of thereafter is 1690 ;

Answer: 12%

Question: in 2015 what percentage of december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is represented by lease obligations?

Answer: 4%

Answer: 4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2015 what percentage of december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is represented by lease obligations?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4%.

Rejected response: 12%.

Question: in 2015 what percentage of december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is represented by lease obligations?

Answer: 4%

in millions the lease obligations of 2015 is $ 142 ; the lease obligations of 2016 is $ 106 ; the lease obligations of 2017 is $ 84 ; the lease obligations of 2018 is $ 63 ; the lease obligations of 2019 is $ 45 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is $ 91 ;

in millions the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2015 is 3266 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2016 is 761 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2017 is 583 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2018 is 463 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of 2019 is 422 ; the purchase obligations ( a ) of thereafter is 1690 ;

in millions the total of 2015 is $ 3408 ; the total of 2016 is $ 867 ; the total of 2017 is $ 667 ; the total of 2018 is $ 526 ; the total of 2019 is $ 467 ; the total of thereafter is $ 1781 ;

Answer: 4%

Question: in 2016 what percentage of december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is represented by lease obligations?

Answer: 12%

Answer: 12%

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2004 and 2005?\\n
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -403%.

Rejected response: 2471%.

BLL || what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) <TIME>?\\n

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2004 and 2005?\\n

Answer: -403%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2004 of foreign currency translation is 148.9 ; the december 31 2004 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -126.3 ( 126.3 ) ; the december 31 2004 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 10.6 ; the december 31 2004 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 33.2 ;

( $ in millions ) the 2005 change of foreign currency translation is -74.3 ( 74.3 ) ; the 2005 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -43.6 ( 43.6 ) ; the 2005 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -16.0 ( 16.0 ) ; the 2005 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -133.9 ( 133.9 ) ;

( $ in millions ) The 2004 change of foreign currency translation is 68.2 ; The 2004 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -33.2 ( 33.2 ) ; The 2004 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -0.4 ( 0.4 ) ; The 2004 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 34.6 ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2005 of foreign currency translation is 74.6 ; the december 31 2005 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -169.9 ( 169.9 ) ; the december 31 2005 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -5.4 ( 5.4 ) ; the december 31 2005 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -100.7 ( 100.7 ) ;

Answer: -403%

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2003 and 2004?\\n

Answer: 2471%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2003 of foreign currency translation is $ 80.7 ; the december 31 2003 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is $ -93.1 ( 93.1 ) ; the december 31 2003 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is $ 11.0 ; the december 31 2003 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is $ -1.4 ( 1.4 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the 2004 change of foreign currency translation is 68.2 ; the 2004 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -33.2 ( 33.2 ) ; the 2004 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -0.4 ( 0.4 ) ; the 2004 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 34.6 ;

accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) .

Answer: 2471%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2004 and 2005?\\n
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -403%.

Rejected response: 462%.

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2004 and 2005?\\n

Answer: -403%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2004 of foreign currency translation is 148.9 ; the december 31 2004 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -126.3 ( 126.3 ) ; the december 31 2004 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 10.6 ; the december 31 2004 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 33.2 ;

( $ in millions ) the 2005 change of foreign currency translation is -74.3 ( 74.3 ) ; the 2005 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -43.6 ( 43.6 ) ; the 2005 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -16.0 ( 16.0 ) ; the 2005 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -133.9 ( 133.9 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2005 of foreign currency translation is 74.6 ; the december 31 2005 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -169.9 ( 169.9 ) ; the december 31 2005 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -5.4 ( 5.4 ) ; the december 31 2005 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -100.7 ( 100.7 ) ;

Answer: -403%

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2006 and 2007?\\n

Answer: 462%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2006 of foreign currency translation is 131.8 ; the december 31 2006 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -161.9 ( 161.9 ) ; the december 31 2006 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 0.6 ; the december 31 2006 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -29.5 ( 29.5 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2007 of foreign currency translation is $ 221.8 ; the december 31 2007 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) ; the december 31 2007 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) ; the december 31 2007 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is $ 106.9 ;

( $ in millions ) The 2006 change of foreign currency translation is 57.2 ; The 2006 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is 55.9 ; The 2006 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 6.0 ; The 2006 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 119.1 ;

( $ in millions ) the 2007 change of foreign currency translation is 90.0 ; the 2007 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is 57.9 ; the 2007 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -11.5 ( 11.5 ) ; the 2007 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 136.4 ;

Answer: 462%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2004 and 2005?\\n
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -403%.

Rejected response: 71%.

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2004 and 2005?\\n

Answer: -403%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2004 of foreign currency translation is 148.9 ; the december 31 2004 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -126.3 ( 126.3 ) ; the december 31 2004 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 10.6 ; the december 31 2004 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 33.2 ;

( $ in millions ) the 2005 change of foreign currency translation is -74.3 ( 74.3 ) ; the 2005 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -43.6 ( 43.6 ) ; the 2005 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -16.0 ( 16.0 ) ; the 2005 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -133.9 ( 133.9 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2005 of foreign currency translation is 74.6 ; the december 31 2005 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -169.9 ( 169.9 ) ; the december 31 2005 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -5.4 ( 5.4 ) ; the december 31 2005 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -100.7 ( 100.7 ) ;

Answer: -403%

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2005 and 2006?\\n

Answer: 71%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2006 of foreign currency translation is 131.8 ; the december 31 2006 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -161.9 ( 161.9 ) ; the december 31 2006 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 0.6 ; the december 31 2006 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -29.5 ( 29.5 ) ;

Answer: 71%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2003 and 2004?\\n
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2471%.

Rejected response: -403%.

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2003 and 2004?\\n

Answer: 2471%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2003 of foreign currency translation is $ 80.7 ; the december 31 2003 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is $ -93.1 ( 93.1 ) ; the december 31 2003 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is $ 11.0 ; the december 31 2003 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is $ -1.4 ( 1.4 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the 2004 change of foreign currency translation is 68.2 ; the 2004 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -33.2 ( 33.2 ) ; the 2004 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -0.4 ( 0.4 ) ; the 2004 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 34.6 ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2004 of foreign currency translation is 148.9 ; the december 31 2004 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -126.3 ( 126.3 ) ; the december 31 2004 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 10.6 ; the december 31 2004 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 33.2 ;

Answer: 2471%

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2004 and 2005?\\n

Answer: -403%

( $ in millions ) the 2005 change of foreign currency translation is -74.3 ( 74.3 ) ; the 2005 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -43.6 ( 43.6 ) ; the 2005 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -16.0 ( 16.0 ) ; the 2005 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -133.9 ( 133.9 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2005 of foreign currency translation is 74.6 ; the december 31 2005 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -169.9 ( 169.9 ) ; the december 31 2005 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -5.4 ( 5.4 ) ; the december 31 2005 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -100.7 ( 100.7 ) ;

Answer: -403%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2003 and 2004?\\n
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2471%.

Rejected response: 462%.

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2003 and 2004?\\n

Answer: 2471%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2003 of foreign currency translation is $ 80.7 ; the december 31 2003 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is $ -93.1 ( 93.1 ) ; the december 31 2003 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is $ 11.0 ; the december 31 2003 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is $ -1.4 ( 1.4 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the 2004 change of foreign currency translation is 68.2 ; the 2004 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -33.2 ( 33.2 ) ; the 2004 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -0.4 ( 0.4 ) ; the 2004 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 34.6 ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2004 of foreign currency translation is 148.9 ; the december 31 2004 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -126.3 ( 126.3 ) ; the december 31 2004 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 10.6 ; the december 31 2004 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 33.2 ;

Answer: 2471%

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2006 and 2007?\\n

Answer: 462%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2006 of foreign currency translation is 131.8 ; the december 31 2006 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -161.9 ( 161.9 ) ; the december 31 2006 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 0.6 ; the december 31 2006 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -29.5 ( 29.5 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the 2007 change of foreign currency translation is 90.0 ; the 2007 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is 57.9 ; the 2007 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -11.5 ( 11.5 ) ; the 2007 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 136.4 ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2007 of foreign currency translation is $ 221.8 ; the december 31 2007 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) ; the december 31 2007 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) ; the december 31 2007 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is $ 106.9 ;

Answer: 462%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2003 and 2004?\\n
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2471%.

Rejected response: 71%.

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2003 and 2004?\\n

Answer: 2471%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2003 of foreign currency translation is $ 80.7 ; the december 31 2003 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is $ -93.1 ( 93.1 ) ; the december 31 2003 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is $ 11.0 ; the december 31 2003 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is $ -1.4 ( 1.4 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the 2004 change of foreign currency translation is 68.2 ; the 2004 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -33.2 ( 33.2 ) ; the 2004 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -0.4 ( 0.4 ) ; the 2004 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 34.6 ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2004 of foreign currency translation is 148.9 ; the december 31 2004 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -126.3 ( 126.3 ) ; the december 31 2004 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 10.6 ; the december 31 2004 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 33.2 ;

Answer: 2471%

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2005 and 2006?\\n

Answer: 71%

( $ in millions ) the 2005 change of foreign currency translation is -74.3 ( 74.3 ) ; the 2005 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -43.6 ( 43.6 ) ; the 2005 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -16.0 ( 16.0 ) ; the 2005 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -133.9 ( 133.9 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2005 of foreign currency translation is 74.6 ; the december 31 2005 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -169.9 ( 169.9 ) ; the december 31 2005 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -5.4 ( 5.4 ) ; the december 31 2005 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -100.7 ( 100.7 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2006 of foreign currency translation is 131.8 ; the december 31 2006 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -161.9 ( 161.9 ) ; the december 31 2006 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 0.6 ; the december 31 2006 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -29.5 ( 29.5 ) ;

Answer: 71%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2006 and 2007?\\n
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 462%.

Rejected response: -403%.

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2006 and 2007?\\n

Answer: 462%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2006 of foreign currency translation is 131.8 ; the december 31 2006 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -161.9 ( 161.9 ) ; the december 31 2006 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 0.6 ; the december 31 2006 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -29.5 ( 29.5 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the 2007 change of foreign currency translation is 90.0 ; the 2007 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is 57.9 ; the 2007 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -11.5 ( 11.5 ) ; the 2007 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 136.4 ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2007 of foreign currency translation is $ 221.8 ; the december 31 2007 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) ; the december 31 2007 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) ; the december 31 2007 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is $ 106.9 ;

Answer: 462%

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2004 and 2005?\\n

Answer: -403%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2004 of foreign currency translation is 148.9 ; the december 31 2004 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -126.3 ( 126.3 ) ; the december 31 2004 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 10.6 ; the december 31 2004 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 33.2 ;

( $ in millions ) the 2005 change of foreign currency translation is -74.3 ( 74.3 ) ; the 2005 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -43.6 ( 43.6 ) ; the 2005 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -16.0 ( 16.0 ) ; the 2005 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -133.9 ( 133.9 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2005 of foreign currency translation is 74.6 ; the december 31 2005 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -169.9 ( 169.9 ) ; the december 31 2005 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -5.4 ( 5.4 ) ; the december 31 2005 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -100.7 ( 100.7 ) ;

Answer: -403%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2006 and 2007?\\n
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 462%.

Rejected response: 2471%.

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2006 and 2007?\\n

Answer: 462%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2006 of foreign currency translation is 131.8 ; the december 31 2006 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -161.9 ( 161.9 ) ; the december 31 2006 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 0.6 ; the december 31 2006 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -29.5 ( 29.5 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the 2007 change of foreign currency translation is 90.0 ; the 2007 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is 57.9 ; the 2007 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -11.5 ( 11.5 ) ; the 2007 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 136.4 ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2007 of foreign currency translation is $ 221.8 ; the december 31 2007 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) ; the december 31 2007 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) ; the december 31 2007 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is $ 106.9 ;

Answer: 462%

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2003 and 2004?\\n

Answer: 2471%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2003 of foreign currency translation is $ 80.7 ; the december 31 2003 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is $ -93.1 ( 93.1 ) ; the december 31 2003 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is $ 11.0 ; the december 31 2003 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is $ -1.4 ( 1.4 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the 2004 change of foreign currency translation is 68.2 ; the 2004 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -33.2 ( 33.2 ) ; the 2004 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -0.4 ( 0.4 ) ; the 2004 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 34.6 ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2004 of foreign currency translation is 148.9 ; the december 31 2004 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -126.3 ( 126.3 ) ; the december 31 2004 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 10.6 ; the december 31 2004 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 33.2 ;

Answer: 2471%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2006 and 2007?\\n
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 462%.

Rejected response: 71%.

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2006 and 2007?\\n

Answer: 462%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2006 of foreign currency translation is 131.8 ; the december 31 2006 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -161.9 ( 161.9 ) ; the december 31 2006 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 0.6 ; the december 31 2006 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -29.5 ( 29.5 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the 2007 change of foreign currency translation is 90.0 ; the 2007 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is 57.9 ; the 2007 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -11.5 ( 11.5 ) ; the 2007 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 136.4 ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2007 of foreign currency translation is $ 221.8 ; the december 31 2007 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) ; the december 31 2007 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) ; the december 31 2007 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is $ 106.9 ;

Answer: 462%

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2005 and 2006?\\n

Answer: 71%

( $ in millions ) the 2005 change of foreign currency translation is -74.3 ( 74.3 ) ; the 2005 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -43.6 ( 43.6 ) ; the 2005 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -16.0 ( 16.0 ) ; the 2005 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -133.9 ( 133.9 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2005 of foreign currency translation is 74.6 ; the december 31 2005 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -169.9 ( 169.9 ) ; the december 31 2005 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -5.4 ( 5.4 ) ; the december 31 2005 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -100.7 ( 100.7 ) ;

Answer: 71%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2005 and 2006?\\n
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 71%.

Rejected response: -403%.

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2005 and 2006?\\n

Answer: 71%

( $ in millions ) the 2005 change of foreign currency translation is -74.3 ( 74.3 ) ; the 2005 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -43.6 ( 43.6 ) ; the 2005 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -16.0 ( 16.0 ) ; the 2005 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -133.9 ( 133.9 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2005 of foreign currency translation is 74.6 ; the december 31 2005 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -169.9 ( 169.9 ) ; the december 31 2005 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -5.4 ( 5.4 ) ; the december 31 2005 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -100.7 ( 100.7 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2006 of foreign currency translation is 131.8 ; the december 31 2006 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -161.9 ( 161.9 ) ; the december 31 2006 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 0.6 ; the december 31 2006 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -29.5 ( 29.5 ) ;

Answer: 71%

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2004 and 2005?\\n

Answer: -403%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2004 of foreign currency translation is 148.9 ; the december 31 2004 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -126.3 ( 126.3 ) ; the december 31 2004 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 10.6 ; the december 31 2004 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 33.2 ;

Answer: -403%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2005 and 2006?\\n
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 71%.

Rejected response: 2471%.

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2005 and 2006?\\n

Answer: 71%

( $ in millions ) the 2005 change of foreign currency translation is -74.3 ( 74.3 ) ; the 2005 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -43.6 ( 43.6 ) ; the 2005 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -16.0 ( 16.0 ) ; the 2005 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -133.9 ( 133.9 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2005 of foreign currency translation is 74.6 ; the december 31 2005 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -169.9 ( 169.9 ) ; the december 31 2005 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -5.4 ( 5.4 ) ; the december 31 2005 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -100.7 ( 100.7 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2006 of foreign currency translation is 131.8 ; the december 31 2006 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -161.9 ( 161.9 ) ; the december 31 2006 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 0.6 ; the december 31 2006 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -29.5 ( 29.5 ) ;

Answer: 71%

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2003 and 2004?\\n

Answer: 2471%

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2003 of foreign currency translation is $ 80.7 ; the december 31 2003 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is $ -93.1 ( 93.1 ) ; the december 31 2003 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is $ 11.0 ; the december 31 2003 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is $ -1.4 ( 1.4 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the 2004 change of foreign currency translation is 68.2 ; the 2004 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -33.2 ( 33.2 ) ; the 2004 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -0.4 ( 0.4 ) ; the 2004 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 34.6 ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2004 of foreign currency translation is 148.9 ; the december 31 2004 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -126.3 ( 126.3 ) ; the december 31 2004 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 10.6 ; the december 31 2004 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 33.2 ;

Answer: 2471%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2005 and 2006?\\n
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 71%.

Rejected response: 462%.

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2005 and 2006?\\n

Answer: 71%

( $ in millions ) the 2005 change of foreign currency translation is -74.3 ( 74.3 ) ; the 2005 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -43.6 ( 43.6 ) ; the 2005 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -16.0 ( 16.0 ) ; the 2005 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -133.9 ( 133.9 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2005 of foreign currency translation is 74.6 ; the december 31 2005 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -169.9 ( 169.9 ) ; the december 31 2005 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -5.4 ( 5.4 ) ; the december 31 2005 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -100.7 ( 100.7 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2006 of foreign currency translation is 131.8 ; the december 31 2006 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is -161.9 ( 161.9 ) ; the december 31 2006 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is 0.6 ; the december 31 2006 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is -29.5 ( 29.5 ) ;

Answer: 71%

Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2006 and 2007?\\n

Answer: 462%

( $ in millions ) the 2007 change of foreign currency translation is 90.0 ; the 2007 change of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is 57.9 ; the 2007 change of effective financial derivatives net of tax is -11.5 ( 11.5 ) ; the 2007 change of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is 136.4 ;

( $ in millions ) the december 31 2007 of foreign currency translation is $ 221.8 ; the december 31 2007 of pension and other postretirement items net of tax is $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) ; the december 31 2007 of effective financial derivatives net of tax is $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) ; the december 31 2007 of accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) is $ 106.9 ;

Answer: 462%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in cash dividends received in 2010 compare to 2009?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 26.8%.

Rejected response: 9.9%.

CE || what is the growth rate in cash dividends received <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in cash dividends received in 2010 compare to 2009?

Answer: 26.8%

in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively .

since their inception in 1986 , the china acetate ventures have completed 12 expansions , leading to earnings growth and increased dividends .

in december 2009 , we announced plans with china national tobacco to expand our acetate flake and tow capacity at our venture's nantong facility and we received formal approval for the expansions , each by 30000 tons , during 2010 .

although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cus gaap 201d ) .

the table below represents our equity investments in infraserv ventures as of december 31 , 2011: .

Answer: 26.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in cash dividends received in 2011 compare to 2010?

Answer: 9.9%

in 2010 , we made contributions of $ 12 million .

Answer: 9.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in cash dividends received in 2011 compare to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9.9%.

Rejected response: 26.8%.

Question: what is the growth rate in cash dividends received in 2011 compare to 2010?

Answer: 9.9%

in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively .

although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cus gaap 201d ) .

the table below represents our equity investments in infraserv ventures as of december 31 , 2011: .

Answer: 9.9%

Question: what is the growth rate in cash dividends received in 2010 compare to 2009?

Answer: 26.8%

Answer: 26.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2011 what was the percentage change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 61.5%.

Rejected response: 63%.

SWKS || <TIME> what was the percentage change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits

Question: in 2011 what was the percentage change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits

Answer: 61.5%

balance at october 1 2010 the balance at september 30 2011 of $ 19900 is $ 32136 ;

the company recognized $ 0.5 million of accrued interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits during fiscal year 2011 .

notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : .

balance at october 1 2010 the balance at october 1 2010 of $ 19900 is $ 19900 ;

balance at october 1 2010 the increases based on positions related to current year of $ 19900 is 11334 ;

Answer: 61.5%

Question: in 2012 what was the percentage change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits

Answer: 63%

the balance at september 30 2011 of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 32136 ;

the balance at september 28 2012 of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 52380 ;

a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : unrecognized tax benefits .

the company 2019s gross unrecognized tax benefits totaled $ 52.4 million and $ 32.1 million as of september 28 , 2012 and september 30 , 2011 , respectively .

Answer: 63%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2012 what was the percentage change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 63%.

Rejected response: 61.5%.

Question: in 2012 what was the percentage change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits

Answer: 63%

the company 2019s gross unrecognized tax benefits totaled $ 52.4 million and $ 32.1 million as of september 28 , 2012 and september 30 , 2011 , respectively .

the balance at september 30 2011 of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 32136 ;

the balance at september 28 2012 of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 52380 ;

Answer: 63%

Question: in 2011 what was the percentage change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits

Answer: 61.5%

balance at october 1 2010 the balance at october 1 2010 of $ 19900 is $ 19900 ;

balance at october 1 2010 the increases based on positions related to current year of $ 19900 is 11334 ;

balance at october 1 2010 the balance at september 30 2011 of $ 19900 is $ 32136 ;

Answer: 61.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in accumulated other comprehensive income during 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -606.

Rejected response: 46.

INTC || what is the net change in accumulated other comprehensive income <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in accumulated other comprehensive income during 2015?

Answer: -606

( in millions ) the december 27 2014 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale investments is $ 2459 ; the december 27 2014 of deferred tax asset valuation allowance is $ 26 ; the december 27 2014 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is $ -423 ( 423 ) ; the december 27 2014 of prior service credits ( costs ) is $ -47 ( 47 ) ; the december 27 2014 of actuarial gains ( losses ) is $ -1004 ( 1004 ) ; the december 27 2014 of foreign currency translation adjustment is $ -345 ( 345 ) ; the december 27 2014 of total is $ 666 ;

( in millions ) the december 26 2015 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale investments is 1749 ; the december 26 2015 of deferred tax asset valuation allowance is 8 ; the december 26 2015 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is -266 ( 266 ) ; the december 26 2015 of prior service credits ( costs ) is -40 ( 40 ) ; the december 26 2015 of actuarial gains ( losses ) is -876 ( 876 ) ; the december 26 2015 of foreign currency translation adjustment is -515 ( 515 ) ; the december 26 2015 of total is 60 ;

Answer: -606

Question: what is the net change in accumulated other comprehensive income during 2016?

Answer: 46

( in millions ) the december 31 2016 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale investments is $ 2164 ; the december 31 2016 of deferred tax asset valuation allowance is $ 2014 ; the december 31 2016 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is $ -259 ( 259 ) ; the december 31 2016 of prior service credits ( costs ) is $ -40 ( 40 ) ; the december 31 2016 of actuarial gains ( losses ) is $ -1240 ( 1240 ) ; the december 31 2016 of foreign currency translation adjustment is $ -519 ( 519 ) ; the december 31 2016 of total is $ 106 ;

Answer: 46


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in accumulated other comprehensive income during 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 46.

Rejected response: -606.

Question: what is the net change in accumulated other comprehensive income during 2016?

Answer: 46

( in millions ) the december 26 2015 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale investments is 1749 ; the december 26 2015 of deferred tax asset valuation allowance is 8 ; the december 26 2015 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is -266 ( 266 ) ; the december 26 2015 of prior service credits ( costs ) is -40 ( 40 ) ; the december 26 2015 of actuarial gains ( losses ) is -876 ( 876 ) ; the december 26 2015 of foreign currency translation adjustment is -515 ( 515 ) ; the december 26 2015 of total is 60 ;

( in millions ) the december 31 2016 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale investments is $ 2164 ; the december 31 2016 of deferred tax asset valuation allowance is $ 2014 ; the december 31 2016 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is $ -259 ( 259 ) ; the december 31 2016 of prior service credits ( costs ) is $ -40 ( 40 ) ; the december 31 2016 of actuarial gains ( losses ) is $ -1240 ( 1240 ) ; the december 31 2016 of foreign currency translation adjustment is $ -519 ( 519 ) ; the december 31 2016 of total is $ 106 ;

Answer: 46

Question: what is the net change in accumulated other comprehensive income during 2015?

Answer: -606

( in millions ) the december 27 2014 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale investments is $ 2459 ; the december 27 2014 of deferred tax asset valuation allowance is $ 26 ; the december 27 2014 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is $ -423 ( 423 ) ; the december 27 2014 of prior service credits ( costs ) is $ -47 ( 47 ) ; the december 27 2014 of actuarial gains ( losses ) is $ -1004 ( 1004 ) ; the december 27 2014 of foreign currency translation adjustment is $ -345 ( 345 ) ; the december 27 2014 of total is $ 666 ;

Answer: -606


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was operating income return on sales on the discontinued glass segment in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12.2%.

Rejected response: 13.8%.

PPG || what was operating income return on sales on the discontinued glass segment <TIME>?

Question: what was operating income return on sales on the discontinued glass segment in 2016?

Answer: 12.2%

( $ in millions ) the net sales of 2018 is $ 2014 ; the net sales of 2017 is $ 217 ; the net sales of 2016 is $ 908 ;

( $ in millions ) the income from operations of 2018 is $ 21 ; the income from operations of 2017 is $ 30 ; the income from operations of 2016 is $ 111 ;

the net sales and income from discontinued operations related to the former glass segment for the three years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were as follows: .

Answer: 12.2%

Question: what was operating income return on sales on the discontinued glass segment in 2017?

Answer: 13.8%

Answer: 13.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was operating income return on sales on the discontinued glass segment in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.8%.

Rejected response: 12.2%.

Question: what was operating income return on sales on the discontinued glass segment in 2017?

Answer: 13.8%

the net sales and income from discontinued operations related to the former glass segment for the three years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were as follows: .

( $ in millions ) the net sales of 2018 is $ 2014 ; the net sales of 2017 is $ 217 ; the net sales of 2016 is $ 908 ;

( $ in millions ) the income from operations of 2018 is $ 21 ; the income from operations of 2017 is $ 30 ; the income from operations of 2016 is $ 111 ;

Answer: 13.8%

Question: what was operating income return on sales on the discontinued glass segment in 2016?

Answer: 12.2%

Answer: 12.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total cash received from shares purchased from employees during 2009 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.9.

Rejected response: 2.6.

AMT || what is the total cash received from shares purchased from employees <TIME> , in millions?

Question: what is the total cash received from shares purchased from employees during 2009 , in millions?

Answer: 1.9

during the 2010 , 2009 and 2008 offering periods employees purchased 75354 , 77509 and 55764 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 34.16 , $ 23.91 and $ 30.08 , respectively .

the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 9.43 , $ 6.65 and $ 7.89 , respectively .

under the espp , shares of the company 2019s common stock may be purchased during bi-annual offering periods at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value on the first or the last day of each offering period .

key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: .

stock repurchase program 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 9.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 420.8 million , including commissions and fees , of which $ 418.6 million was paid in cash prior to december 31 , 2010 and $ 2.2 million was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2010 , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase program , as described below. .

Answer: 1.9

Question: what is the total cash received from shares purchased from employees during 2010 , in millions?

Answer: 2.6

Answer: 2.6


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total cash received from shares purchased from employees during 2010 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.6.

Rejected response: 1.9.

Question: what is the total cash received from shares purchased from employees during 2010 , in millions?

Answer: 2.6

during the 2010 , 2009 and 2008 offering periods employees purchased 75354 , 77509 and 55764 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 34.16 , $ 23.91 and $ 30.08 , respectively .

key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: .

stock repurchase program 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 9.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 420.8 million , including commissions and fees , of which $ 418.6 million was paid in cash prior to december 31 , 2010 and $ 2.2 million was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2010 , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase program , as described below. .

Answer: 2.6

Question: what is the total cash received from shares purchased from employees during 2009 , in millions?

Answer: 1.9

Answer: 1.9


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: for 2012 quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims , what was the change in millions between originations from first and second quarter of 2007?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10.

Rejected response: 13.

PNC || <TIME> quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims , what was the change in millions between originations from first and second quarter of <TIME>?

Question: for 2012 quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims , what was the change in millions between originations from first and second quarter of 2007?

Answer: 10

dollars in millions the 2007 of december 31 2012 is 45 ; the 2007 of september 30 2012 is 137 ; the 2007 of june 30 2012 is 182 ; the 2007 of march 31 2012 is 100 ; the 2007 of december 312011 is 90 ;

table 28 : analysis of quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims by vintage dollars in millions december 31 september 30 june 30 march 31 december 31 .

for the first and second-lien mortgage balances of unresolved and settled claims contained in the tables below , a significant amount of these claims were associated with sold loans originated through correspondent lender and broker origination channels .

dollars in millions the total of december 31 2012 is $ 132 ; the total of september 30 2012 is $ 267 ; the total of june 30 2012 is $ 379 ; the total of march 31 2012 is $ 213 ; the total of december 312011 is $ 189 ;

Answer: 10

Question: for 2012 quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims , what was the change in millions between originations from first and second quarter of 2006?

Answer: 13

dollars in millions the 2006 of december 31 2012 is 23 ; the 2006 of september 30 2012 is 30 ; the 2006 of june 30 2012 is 56 ; the 2006 of march 31 2012 is 41 ; the 2006 of december 312011 is 28 ;

Answer: 13


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: for 2012 quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims , what was the change in millions between originations from first and second quarter of 2006?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.

Rejected response: 10.

Question: for 2012 quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims , what was the change in millions between originations from first and second quarter of 2006?

Answer: 13

dollars in millions the 2006 of december 31 2012 is 23 ; the 2006 of september 30 2012 is 30 ; the 2006 of june 30 2012 is 56 ; the 2006 of march 31 2012 is 41 ; the 2006 of december 312011 is 28 ;

dollars in millions the total of december 31 2012 is $ 132 ; the total of september 30 2012 is $ 267 ; the total of june 30 2012 is $ 379 ; the total of march 31 2012 is $ 213 ; the total of december 312011 is $ 189 ;

Answer: 13

Question: for 2012 quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims , what was the change in millions between originations from first and second quarter of 2007?

Answer: 10

dollars in millions the 2007 of december 31 2012 is 45 ; the 2007 of september 30 2012 is 137 ; the 2007 of june 30 2012 is 182 ; the 2007 of march 31 2012 is 100 ; the 2007 of december 312011 is 90 ;

Answer: 10


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage growth in the cash dividends from 2009 to 2010
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 26.8%.

Rejected response: 9.9%.

CE || what was the percentage growth in the cash dividends <TIME>

Question: what was the percentage growth in the cash dividends from 2009 to 2010

Answer: 26.8%

Explanation: the percentage change is the difference from year to year divide by the earlier year balance

combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers .

in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively .

although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cus gaap 201d ) .

Answer: 26.8%

Question: what was the percentage growth in the cash dividends from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 9.9%

Answer: 9.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage growth in the cash dividends from 2010 to 2011
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9.9%.

Rejected response: 26.8%.

Question: what was the percentage growth in the cash dividends from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 9.9%

Explanation: the percentage change is the difference from year to year divide by the earlier year balance

combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers .

in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively .

although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cus gaap 201d ) .

Answer: 9.9%

Question: what was the percentage growth in the cash dividends from 2009 to 2010

Answer: 26.8%

Answer: 26.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: 47%.

CMCSA || what is the percentage change in comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 13%

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal of 2015 is $ 3361 ; the comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal of 2014 is $ 2972 ; the comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal of 2013 is $ 2017 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) The other comprehensive ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests of 2015 is 29 ; The other comprehensive ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests of 2014 is 2014 ; The other comprehensive ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests of 2013 is 2014 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) The comprehensive income of 2015 is 3542 ; The comprehensive income of 2014 is 3154 ; The comprehensive income of 2013 is 2171 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the net income of 2015 is $ 3624 ; the net income of 2014 is $ 3297 ; the net income of 2013 is $ 2122 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the comprehensive income of 2015 is 3542 ; the comprehensive income of 2014 is 3154 ; the comprehensive income of 2013 is 2171 ;

Answer: 13%

Question: what is the percentage change in comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 47%

Answer: 47%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 47%.

Rejected response: 13%.

Question: what is the percentage change in comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 47%

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the net income of 2015 is $ 3624 ; the net income of 2014 is $ 3297 ; the net income of 2013 is $ 2122 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the comprehensive income of 2015 is 3542 ; the comprehensive income of 2014 is 3154 ; the comprehensive income of 2013 is 2171 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal of 2015 is $ 3361 ; the comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal of 2014 is $ 2972 ; the comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal of 2013 is $ 2017 ;

Answer: 47%

Question: what is the percentage change in comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 13%

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage does rental expense make up of gross cost of facilities funded in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.5%.

Rejected response: 14.0%.

AWK || what percentage does rental expense make up of gross cost of facilities funded <TIME>?

Question: what percentage does rental expense make up of gross cost of facilities funded in 2015?

Answer: 13.5%

rental expenses under operating leases were $ 21 for 2015 , $ 22 for 2014 and $ 23 for 2013 .

the gross cost of the facilities funded by the company recognized as a capital lease asset was $ 156 and $ 157 as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which is presented in property , plant and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .

the company leased back the total facilities , including portions funded by both the company and the partners , under leases for a period of 40 years .

the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non- cancelable lease terms over the next five years and thereafter are as follows: .

Answer: 13.5%

Question: what percentage does rental expense make up of gross cost of facilities funded in 2014?

Answer: 14.0%

Answer: 14.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage does rental expense make up of gross cost of facilities funded in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 14.0%.

Rejected response: 13.5%.

Question: what percentage does rental expense make up of gross cost of facilities funded in 2014?

Answer: 14.0%

rental expenses under operating leases were $ 21 for 2015 , $ 22 for 2014 and $ 23 for 2013 .

the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non- cancelable lease terms over the next five years and thereafter are as follows: .

the gross cost of the facilities funded by the company recognized as a capital lease asset was $ 156 and $ 157 as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which is presented in property , plant and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .

Answer: 14.0%

Question: what percentage does rental expense make up of gross cost of facilities funded in 2015?

Answer: 13.5%

Answer: 13.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the intrinsic value of stock options from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -59.5%.

Rejected response: 56.4%.

AMT || what is the percentage change in the intrinsic value of stock options <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the intrinsic value of stock options from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -59.5%

the intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 62.7 million , $ 40.1 million and $ 99.1 million , respectively .

under the 2007 equity incentive plan ( 201c2007 plan 201d ) , which provides for the grant of non-qualified and incentive stock options , as well as restricted stock units , restricted stock and other stock-based awards , exercise prices in the case of non-qualified and incentive stock options are not less than the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant .

stock options 2014as of december 31 , 2010 , the company had the ability to grant stock-based awards with respect to an aggregate of 22.0 million shares of common stock under the 2007 plan .

the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was approximately $ 129.1 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 .

Answer: -59.5%

Question: what is the percentage change in the intrinsic value of stock options from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: 56.4%

the weighted average grant date fair value per share during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 15.03 , $ 8.90 and $ 9.55 , respectively .

Answer: 56.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the intrinsic value of stock options from 2008 to 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 56.4%.

Rejected response: -59.5%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the intrinsic value of stock options from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: 56.4%

the weighted average grant date fair value per share during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 15.03 , $ 8.90 and $ 9.55 , respectively .

the intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 62.7 million , $ 40.1 million and $ 99.1 million , respectively .

the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was approximately $ 129.1 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 .

Answer: 56.4%

Question: what is the percentage change in the intrinsic value of stock options from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -59.5%

stock options 2014as of december 31 , 2010 , the company had the ability to grant stock-based awards with respect to an aggregate of 22.0 million shares of common stock under the 2007 plan .

Answer: -59.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total amount of cash used for stock repurchase during november 2005 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2005-11-01 00:00:00 to 2005-12-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 23.0.

Rejected response: 53.5.

AMT || what is the total amount of cash used for stock repurchase <TIME> , in millions?

Question: what is the total amount of cash used for stock repurchase during november 2005 , in millions?

Answer: 23.0

period the 12/1/05 2013 12/31/05 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 1962213 ; the 12/1/05 2013 12/31/05 of average price paid per share is $ 27.29 ; the 12/1/05 2013 12/31/05 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) is 1962213 ; the 12/1/05 2013 12/31/05 of approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) is $ 673.4 ;

period the 11/17/05 2013 11/30/05 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 874306 ; the 11/17/05 2013 11/30/05 of average price paid per share is $ 26.25 ; the 11/17/05 2013 11/30/05 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) is 874306 ; the 11/17/05 2013 11/30/05 of approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) is $ 727.0 ;

( 1 ) all issuer repurchases were made pursuant to the stock repurchase program publicly announced in november 2005 .

between january 1 , 2006 and march 9 , 2006 , we repurchased 3.9 million shares of class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 117.4 million pursuant to the stock repurchase program. .

Answer: 23.0

Question: what is the total amount of cash used for stock repurchase during december 2005 , in millions?

Answer: 53.5

since december 31 , 2005 , we have continued to repurchase shares of our class a common stock pursuant to our stock repurchase program .

pursuant to the program , we intend to repurchase up to $ 750.0 million of our class a common stock during the period november 2005 through december 2006 .

Answer: 53.5


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total amount of cash used for stock repurchase during december 2005 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2005-12-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 53.5.

Rejected response: 23.0.

Question: what is the total amount of cash used for stock repurchase during december 2005 , in millions?

Answer: 53.5

period the 11/17/05 2013 11/30/05 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 874306 ; the 11/17/05 2013 11/30/05 of average price paid per share is $ 26.25 ; the 11/17/05 2013 11/30/05 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) is 874306 ; the 11/17/05 2013 11/30/05 of approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) is $ 727.0 ;

period the 12/1/05 2013 12/31/05 of total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) is 1962213 ; the 12/1/05 2013 12/31/05 of average price paid per share is $ 27.29 ; the 12/1/05 2013 12/31/05 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) is 1962213 ; the 12/1/05 2013 12/31/05 of approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) is $ 673.4 ;

between january 1 , 2006 and march 9 , 2006 , we repurchased 3.9 million shares of class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 117.4 million pursuant to the stock repurchase program. .

Answer: 53.5

Question: what is the total amount of cash used for stock repurchase during november 2005 , in millions?

Answer: 23.0

Answer: 23.0


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the pre-tax aggregate net unrealized loss in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 26.

Rejected response: 5.2.

AMT || what is the pre-tax aggregate net unrealized loss <TIME>?

Question: what is the pre-tax aggregate net unrealized loss in 2008?

Answer: 26

during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company recorded an aggregate net unrealized loss of approximately $ 15.8 million and $ 3.2 million , respectively ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 10.2 million and $ 2.0 million , respectively ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified an aggregate of $ 0.1 million and $ 6.2 million , respectively ( net of an income tax provision of $ 2.0 million and an income tax benefit of $ 3.3 million , respectively ) into results of operations .

The unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax of 2008 is -16349 ( 16349 ) ; The unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax of 2007 is -486 ( 486 ) ;

The deferred loss on the settlement of the treasury rate lock net of tax of 2008 is $ -4332 ( 4332 ) ; The deferred loss on the settlement of the treasury rate lock net of tax of 2007 is $ -4901 ( 4901 ) ;

the deferred loss on the settlement of the treasury rate lock net of tax of 2008 is $ -4332 ( 4332 ) ; the deferred loss on the settlement of the treasury rate lock net of tax of 2007 is $ -4901 ( 4901 ) ;

the unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax of 2008 is -16349 ( 16349 ) ; the unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax of 2007 is -486 ( 486 ) ;

Answer: 26

Question: what is the pre-tax aggregate net unrealized loss in 2007?

Answer: 5.2

Answer: 5.2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the pre-tax aggregate net unrealized loss in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5.2.

Rejected response: 26.

Question: what is the pre-tax aggregate net unrealized loss in 2007?

Answer: 5.2

the deferred loss on the settlement of the treasury rate lock net of tax of 2008 is $ -4332 ( 4332 ) ; the deferred loss on the settlement of the treasury rate lock net of tax of 2007 is $ -4901 ( 4901 ) ;

the unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax of 2008 is -16349 ( 16349 ) ; the unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax of 2007 is -486 ( 486 ) ;

during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company recorded an aggregate net unrealized loss of approximately $ 15.8 million and $ 3.2 million , respectively ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 10.2 million and $ 2.0 million , respectively ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified an aggregate of $ 0.1 million and $ 6.2 million , respectively ( net of an income tax provision of $ 2.0 million and an income tax benefit of $ 3.3 million , respectively ) into results of operations .

Answer: 5.2

Question: what is the pre-tax aggregate net unrealized loss in 2008?

Answer: 26

Answer: 26


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2010?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -28.0%.

Rejected response: 4.3%.

ADBE || what is the growth rate in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2010?

Answer: -28.0%

the beginning balance of 2011 is $ 156925 ; the beginning balance of 2010 is $ 218040 ;

the ending balance of 2011 is $ 163607 ; the ending balance of 2010 is $ 156925 ;

accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2011 and 2010 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : beginning balance gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions settlements with taxing authorities lapse of statute of limitations foreign exchange gains and losses ending balance $ 156925 11901 ( 4154 ) 32420 ( 29101 ) ( 3825 ) $ 163607 $ 218040 ( 7104 ) 15108 ( 70484 ) ( 7896 ) $ 156925 as of december 2 , 2011 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 12.3 million .

the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2011 is 11901 ; the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2010 is 9580 ;

Answer: -28.0%

Question: what is the growth rate in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2011?

Answer: 4.3%

Answer: 4.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.3%.

Rejected response: -28.0%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2011?

Answer: 4.3%

the beginning balance of 2011 is $ 156925 ; the beginning balance of 2010 is $ 218040 ;

the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2011 is 11901 ; the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2010 is 9580 ;

the ending balance of 2011 is $ 163607 ; the ending balance of 2010 is $ 156925 ;

Answer: 4.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2010?

Answer: -28.0%

Answer: -28.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what were average operating profit for space systems in millions between 2014 and 2016?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1216.

Rejected response: 966.

LMT || what were average operating profit for space systems in millions <TIME>?

Question: what were average operating profit for space systems in millions between 2014 and 2016?

Answer: 1216

the operating profit of 2016 is 1289 ; the operating profit of 2015 is 1171 ; the operating profit of 2014 is 1187 ;

space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .

space systems 2019 operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 16 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 .

the net sales of 2016 is $ 9409 ; the net sales of 2015 is $ 9105 ; the net sales of 2014 is $ 9202 ;

space systems 2019 operating profit in 2016 increased $ 118 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2015 .

Answer: 1216

Question: what were average operating profit for space systems in millions from 2008 to 2010?

Answer: 966

( in millions ) the operating profit of 2010 is 972 ; the operating profit of 2009 is 972 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 953 ;

space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 .

net sales for space systems decreased by 5% ( 5 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 .

( in millions ) the net sales of 2010 is $ 8246 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 8654 ; the net sales of 2008 is $ 8027 ;

( in millions ) the operating margin of 2010 is 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2009 is 11.2% ( 11.2 % ) ; the operating margin of 2008 is 11.9% ( 11.9 % ) ;

Answer: 966


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what were average operating profit for space systems in millions from 2008 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 966.

Rejected response: 1216.

Question: what were average operating profit for space systems in millions from 2008 to 2010?

Answer: 966

( in millions ) the net sales of 2010 is $ 8246 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 8654 ; the net sales of 2008 is $ 8027 ;

( in millions ) the operating profit of 2010 is 972 ; the operating profit of 2009 is 972 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 953 ;

( in millions ) the operating margin of 2010 is 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) ; the operating margin of 2009 is 11.2% ( 11.2 % ) ; the operating margin of 2008 is 11.9% ( 11.9 % ) ;

Answer: 966

Question: what were average operating profit for space systems in millions between 2014 and 2016?

Answer: 1216

the net sales of 2016 is $ 9409 ; the net sales of 2015 is $ 9105 ; the net sales of 2014 is $ 9202 ;

the operating profit of 2016 is 1289 ; the operating profit of 2015 is 1171 ; the operating profit of 2014 is 1187 ;

space systems 2019 operating profit in 2016 increased $ 118 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2015 .

Answer: 1216


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock for the five year period ended 2010?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -48.49%.

Rejected response: 129.59%.

MAS || what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock for the five year period ended <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock for the five year period ended 2010?

Answer: -48.49%

the masco of 2006 is $ 101.79 ; the masco of 2007 is $ 76.74 ; the masco of 2008 is $ 42.81 ; the masco of 2009 is $ 54.89 ; the masco of 2010 is $ 51.51 ;

the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .

performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 201cs&p industrials index 201d ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 201cs&p consumer durables & apparel index 201d ) , from december 31 , 2005 through december 31 , 2010 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 12.66 .

performance graph 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2005 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

Answer: -48.49%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock for the five year period ended 2013?

Answer: 129.59%

the masco of 2009 is $ 128.21 ; the masco of 2010 is $ 120.32 ; the masco of 2011 is $ 102.45 ; the masco of 2012 is $ 165.80 ; the masco of 2013 is $ 229.59 ;

the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .

6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 .

Answer: 129.59%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock for the five year period ended 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 129.59%.

Rejected response: -48.49%.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock for the five year period ended 2013?

Answer: 129.59%

the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .

the masco of 2009 is $ 128.21 ; the masco of 2010 is $ 120.32 ; the masco of 2011 is $ 102.45 ; the masco of 2012 is $ 165.80 ; the masco of 2013 is $ 229.59 ;

Answer: 129.59%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock for the five year period ended 2010?

Answer: -48.49%

the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .

performance graph 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2005 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

the masco of 2006 is $ 101.79 ; the masco of 2007 is $ 76.74 ; the masco of 2008 is $ 42.81 ; the masco of 2009 is $ 54.89 ; the masco of 2010 is $ 51.51 ;

Answer: -48.49%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rental expenses from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17%.

Rejected response: 21%.

LKQ || what was the percentage change in rental expenses <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expenses from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 17%

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 300 million , $ 247 million , and $ 212 million during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .

the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .

as of december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , the fair values of the u.s .

the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2018 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

Answer: 17%

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expenses from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: 21%

in addition , based on market conditions , the fair values of the outstanding borrowings under the receivables facility reasonably approximated the carrying values of $ 110 million and $ 100 million at december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , respectively .

Answer: 21%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rental expenses from 2017 to 2018?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 21%.

Rejected response: 17%.

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expenses from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: 21%

in addition , based on market conditions , the fair values of the outstanding borrowings under the receivables facility reasonably approximated the carrying values of $ 110 million and $ 100 million at december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , respectively .

the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2018 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 300 million , $ 247 million , and $ 212 million during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .

Answer: 21%

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expenses from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 17%

Answer: 17%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -20.7%.

Rejected response: -9.5%.

GS || what is the growth rate in net revenues <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2011?

Answer: -20.7%

in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2012 is 18124 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2011 is 17280 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2010 is 21796 ;

in addition , net revenues in credit products and interest rate products were solid and higher compared with 2011 .

these increases were partially offset by significantly lower net revenues in commodities and slightly lower net revenues in currencies .

includes net revenues related to reinsurance of $ 1.08 billion , $ 880 million and $ 827 million for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively .

net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 .

Answer: -20.7%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2016?

Answer: -9.5%

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32073 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30608 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is $ 33820 ;

2017 versus 2016 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 32.07 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , due to significantly higher other principal transactions revenues , and higher investment banking revenues , investment management revenues and net interest income .

2030 market making consists of revenues ( excluding net interest ) from client execution activities related to making markets in interest rate products , credit products , mortgages , currencies , commodities and equity products .

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents our net revenues by line item in the consolidated statements of earnings. .

Answer: -9.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -20.7%.

Rejected response: 11.9%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2011?

Answer: -20.7%

in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2012 is 18124 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2011 is 17280 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2010 is 21796 ;

includes net revenues related to reinsurance of $ 1.08 billion , $ 880 million and $ 827 million for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively .

net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 .

Answer: -20.7%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2018?

Answer: 11.9%

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2018 is $ 36616 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32730 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30790 ;

2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues .

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. .

Answer: 11.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -20.7%.

Rejected response: 4.8%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2011?

Answer: -20.7%

in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2012 is 18124 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2011 is 17280 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2010 is 21796 ;

includes net revenues related to reinsurance of $ 1.08 billion , $ 880 million and $ 827 million for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively .

net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 .

Answer: -20.7%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 4.8%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents our net revenues by line item in the consolidated statements of earnings. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32073 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30608 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is $ 33820 ;

2017 versus 2016 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 32.07 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , due to significantly higher other principal transactions revenues , and higher investment banking revenues , investment management revenues and net interest income .

Answer: 4.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -20.7%.

Rejected response: 6.3%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2011?

Answer: -20.7%

in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2012 is 18124 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2011 is 17280 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2010 is 21796 ;

includes net revenues related to reinsurance of $ 1.08 billion , $ 880 million and $ 827 million for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively .

net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 .

Answer: -20.7%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 6.3%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2018 is $ 36616 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32730 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30790 ;

2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues .

Answer: 6.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -9.5%.

Rejected response: -20.7%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2016?

Answer: -9.5%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents our net revenues by line item in the consolidated statements of earnings. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32073 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30608 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is $ 33820 ;

2017 versus 2016 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 32.07 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , due to significantly higher other principal transactions revenues , and higher investment banking revenues , investment management revenues and net interest income .

Answer: -9.5%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2011?

Answer: -20.7%

in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2012 is 18124 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2011 is 17280 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2010 is 21796 ;

includes net revenues related to reinsurance of $ 1.08 billion , $ 880 million and $ 827 million for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively .

net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 .

Answer: -20.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -9.5%.

Rejected response: 11.9%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2016?

Answer: -9.5%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents our net revenues by line item in the consolidated statements of earnings. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32073 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30608 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is $ 33820 ;

2017 versus 2016 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 32.07 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , due to significantly higher other principal transactions revenues , and higher investment banking revenues , investment management revenues and net interest income .

Answer: -9.5%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2018?

Answer: 11.9%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2018 is $ 36616 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32730 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30790 ;

2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues .

Answer: 11.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -9.5%.

Rejected response: 4.8%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2016?

Answer: -9.5%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents our net revenues by line item in the consolidated statements of earnings. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32073 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30608 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is $ 33820 ;

2017 versus 2016 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 32.07 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , due to significantly higher other principal transactions revenues , and higher investment banking revenues , investment management revenues and net interest income .

Answer: -9.5%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 4.8%

Answer: 4.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -9.5%.

Rejected response: 6.3%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2016?

Answer: -9.5%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents our net revenues by line item in the consolidated statements of earnings. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32073 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30608 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2015 is $ 33820 ;

2017 versus 2016 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 32.07 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , due to significantly higher other principal transactions revenues , and higher investment banking revenues , investment management revenues and net interest income .

Answer: -9.5%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2017?

Answer: 6.3%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2018 is $ 36616 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32730 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30790 ;

2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues .

Answer: 6.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11.9%.

Rejected response: -20.7%.

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2018?

Answer: 11.9%

and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. .

$ in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2018 is $ 36616 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2017 is $ 32730 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2016 is $ 30790 ;

2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues .

Answer: 11.9%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenues in 2011?

Answer: -20.7%

in millions the total net revenues of year ended december 2012 is 18124 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2011 is 17280 ; the total net revenues of year ended december 2010 is 21796 ;

includes net revenues related to reinsurance of $ 1.08 billion , $ 880 million and $ 827 million for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively .

net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 .

Answer: -20.7%