Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.0%.

Rejected response: 3.9%.

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 4.0%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .

Answer: 4.0%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: 3.9%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2004 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 approximated $ 118741000 , $ 113956000 , and $ 109644000 , respectively. .

Answer: 3.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.0%.

Rejected response: 4.2%.

AMT || what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 4.0%

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .

during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded a net unrealized gain of approximately $ 6.5 million ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 3.5 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 0.7 million ( net of an income tax benefit of $ 0.2 million ) into results of operations during the year ended december 31 , 2006 .

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

Answer: 4.0%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 4.2%

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 approximated $ 118741000 , $ 113956000 , and $ 109644000 , respectively. .

as of december 31 , 2003 , the company had three interest rate caps outstanding with an aggregate notional amount of $ 500.0 million ( each at a rate of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ) that expired in 2004 .

as of december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , there was no fair value associated with any of these interest rate caps .

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2004 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

Answer: 4.2%

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.0%.

Rejected response: 40.5%.

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 4.0%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .

Answer: 4.0%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 40.5%

merger in august 2005 and were not designated as cash flow hedges .

Answer: 40.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2003 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.2%.

Rejected response: 3.9%.

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 4.2%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2004 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 approximated $ 118741000 , $ 113956000 , and $ 109644000 , respectively. .

Answer: 4.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: 3.9%

hedge ineffectiveness resulted in a gain of approximately $ 1.0 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 , which is recorded in other expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations .

Answer: 3.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2003 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.2%.

Rejected response: 4.0%.

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 4.2%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2004 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 approximated $ 118741000 , $ 113956000 , and $ 109644000 , respectively. .

Answer: 4.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 4.0%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .

Answer: 4.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2003 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.2%.

Rejected response: 40.5%.

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 4.2%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2004 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 approximated $ 118741000 , $ 113956000 , and $ 109644000 , respectively. .

Answer: 4.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 40.5%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .

Answer: 40.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 40.5%.

Rejected response: 3.9%.

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 40.5%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .

Answer: 40.5%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: 3.9%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2004 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 approximated $ 118741000 , $ 113956000 , and $ 109644000 , respectively. .

Answer: 3.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 40.5%.

Rejected response: 4.0%.

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 40.5%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .

Answer: 40.5%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 4.0%

Answer: 4.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 40.5%.

Rejected response: 4.2%.

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 40.5%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .

Answer: 40.5%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 4.2%

such payments in effect at december 31 , 2004 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 approximated $ 118741000 , $ 113956000 , and $ 109644000 , respectively. .

Answer: 4.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in ups from 2003 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 16.4%.

Rejected response: 19.9%.

UPS || what is the rate of return of an investment in ups <TIME>?

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in ups from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 16.4%

the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/02 is $ 100.00 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/03 is $ 119.89 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/04 is $ 139.55 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/05 is $ 124.88 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/06 is $ 127.08 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/07 is $ 122.64 ;

the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .

Answer: 16.4%

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in ups from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: 19.9%

subtract(119.89, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

Answer: 19.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in ups from 2002 to 2003?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 19.9%.

Rejected response: 16.4%.

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in ups from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: 19.9%

subtract(119.89, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .

the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/02 is $ 100.00 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/03 is $ 119.89 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/04 is $ 139.55 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/05 is $ 124.88 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/06 is $ 127.08 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/07 is $ 122.64 ;

Answer: 19.9%

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in ups from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 16.4%

Answer: 16.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -15335.

Rejected response: 25286.

ETR || what is the net change in entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from the money pool <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -15335

management 2019s financial discussion and analysis entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .

see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .

2016 the ( in thousands ) of 2015 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2014 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2013 is ( in thousands ) ;

Answer: -15335

Question: what is the net change in entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 25286

Answer: 25286


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 25286.

Rejected response: -15335.

Question: what is the net change in entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 25286

management 2019s financial discussion and analysis entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .

2016 the ( in thousands ) of 2015 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2014 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2013 is ( in thousands ) ;

Answer: 25286

Question: what is the net change in entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -15335

Answer: -15335


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareowners return for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 89.72%.

Rejected response: 95.75%.

UPS || what was the percentage cumulative total shareowners return for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/<TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareowners return for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/2016?

Answer: 89.72%

subtract(189.72, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2011 is $ 100.00 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2012 is $ 103.84 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2013 is $ 152.16 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2014 is $ 165.35 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2015 is $ 154.61 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2016 is $ 189.72 ;

the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average .

The dow jones transportation average of 12/31/2011 is $ 100.00 ; The dow jones transportation average of 12/31/2012 is $ 107.49 ; The dow jones transportation average of 12/31/2013 is $ 151.97 ; The dow jones transportation average of 12/31/2014 is $ 190.07 ; The dow jones transportation average of 12/31/2015 is $ 158.22 ; The dow jones transportation average of 12/31/2016 is $ 192.80 ;

the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .

Answer: 89.72%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareowners return for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/2017?

Answer: 95.75%

subtract(195.75, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2012 is $ 100.00 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2013 is $ 146.54 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2014 is $ 159.23 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2015 is $ 148.89 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2016 is $ 182.70 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2017 is $ 195.75 ;

the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average .

The dow jones transportation average of 12/31/2012 is $ 100.00 ; The dow jones transportation average of 12/31/2013 is $ 141.38 ; The dow jones transportation average of 12/31/2014 is $ 176.83 ; The dow jones transportation average of 12/31/2015 is $ 147.19 ; The dow jones transportation average of 12/31/2016 is $ 179.37 ; The dow jones transportation average of 12/31/2017 is $ 213.49 ;

the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .

Answer: 95.75%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareowners return for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 95.75%.

Rejected response: 89.72%.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareowners return for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/2017?

Answer: 95.75%

subtract(195.75, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .

the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2012 is $ 100.00 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2013 is $ 146.54 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2014 is $ 159.23 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2015 is $ 148.89 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2016 is $ 182.70 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2017 is $ 195.75 ;

Answer: 95.75%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareowners return for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/2016?

Answer: 89.72%

subtract(189.72, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .

the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2011 is $ 100.00 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2012 is $ 103.84 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2013 is $ 152.16 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2014 is $ 165.35 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2015 is $ 154.61 ; the united parcel service inc . of 12/31/2016 is $ 189.72 ;

Answer: 89.72%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1.9%.

Rejected response: -15.2%.

ADBE || what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -1.9%

the beginning balance of 2013 is $ 160468 ; the beginning balance of 2012 is $ 163607 ;

the ending balance of 2013 is $ 136098 ; the ending balance of 2012 is $ 160468 ;

The gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions of 2013 is 16777 ; The gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions of 2012 is 23771 ;

adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2013 and 2012 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Answer: -1.9%

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -15.2%

the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2013 is 20244 ; the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2012 is 1038 ;

Answer: -15.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1.9%.

Rejected response: 4.3%.

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -1.9%

adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2013 and 2012 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .

the beginning balance of 2013 is $ 160468 ; the beginning balance of 2012 is $ 163607 ;

the ending balance of 2013 is $ 136098 ; the ending balance of 2012 is $ 160468 ;

Answer: -1.9%

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 4.3%

the beginning balance of 2012 is $ 163607 ; the beginning balance of 2011 is $ 156925 ;

the ending balance of 2012 is $ 160468 ; the ending balance of 2011 is $ 163607 ;

accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2012 and 2011 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Answer: 4.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -15.2%.

Rejected response: -1.9%.

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -15.2%

the beginning balance of 2013 is $ 160468 ; the beginning balance of 2012 is $ 163607 ;

the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2013 is 20244 ; the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2012 is 1038 ;

the ending balance of 2013 is $ 136098 ; the ending balance of 2012 is $ 160468 ;

Answer: -15.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -1.9%

adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2013 and 2012 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Answer: -1.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -15.2%.

Rejected response: 4.3%.

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -15.2%

the beginning balance of 2013 is $ 160468 ; the beginning balance of 2012 is $ 163607 ;

the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2013 is 20244 ; the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2012 is 1038 ;

the ending balance of 2013 is $ 136098 ; the ending balance of 2012 is $ 160468 ;

Answer: -15.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 4.3%

accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2012 and 2011 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .

the beginning balance of 2012 is $ 163607 ; the beginning balance of 2011 is $ 156925 ;

the ending balance of 2012 is $ 160468 ; the ending balance of 2011 is $ 163607 ;

Answer: 4.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.3%.

Rejected response: -1.9%.

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 4.3%

accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2012 and 2011 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .

the beginning balance of 2012 is $ 163607 ; the beginning balance of 2011 is $ 156925 ;

the ending balance of 2012 is $ 160468 ; the ending balance of 2011 is $ 163607 ;

Answer: 4.3%

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -1.9%

adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2013 and 2012 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .

the beginning balance of 2013 is $ 160468 ; the beginning balance of 2012 is $ 163607 ;

the ending balance of 2013 is $ 136098 ; the ending balance of 2012 is $ 160468 ;

Answer: -1.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.3%.

Rejected response: -15.2%.

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 4.3%

accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2012 and 2011 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .

the beginning balance of 2012 is $ 163607 ; the beginning balance of 2011 is $ 156925 ;

the ending balance of 2012 is $ 160468 ; the ending balance of 2011 is $ 163607 ;

Answer: 4.3%

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -15.2%

the beginning balance of 2013 is $ 160468 ; the beginning balance of 2012 is $ 163607 ;

the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2013 is 20244 ; the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions of 2012 is 1038 ;

the ending balance of 2013 is $ 136098 ; the ending balance of 2012 is $ 160468 ;

Answer: -15.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the average entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2014 to 2017
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10793.5.

Rejected response: 39284.

ETR || what was the average entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool <TIME>

Question: what was the average entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2014 to 2017

Answer: 10793.5

entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .

see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .

2017 the ( in thousands ) of 2016 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2015 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2014 is ( in thousands ) ;

Answer: 10793.5

Question: what was the average entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2008 to 2011

Answer: 39284

entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

2011 the ( in thousands ) of 2010 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2009 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2008 is ( in thousands ) ;

Answer: 39284


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the average entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2008 to 2011
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 39284.

Rejected response: 10793.5.

Question: what was the average entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2008 to 2011

Answer: 39284

entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

2011 the ( in thousands ) of 2010 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2009 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2008 is ( in thousands ) ;

Answer: 39284

Question: what was the average entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2014 to 2017

Answer: 10793.5

entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .

2017 the ( in thousands ) of 2016 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2015 is ( in thousands ) ; the ( in thousands ) of 2014 is ( in thousands ) ;

Answer: 10793.5


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in advertising costs from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 128.7%.

Rejected response: 33.6%.

HOLX || what is the growth rate in advertising costs <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in advertising costs from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 128.7%

advertising costs , which include trade shows and conventions , were approximately $ 15281 , $ 6683 and $ 5003 for fiscal 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and were included in selling and marketing expense in the consolidated statements of operations. .

advertising costs advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred .

during the twelve months ended september 27 , 2008 , the company did not incur any additional restructuring costs related to retention costs for these employees .

other the ending balance of twelve months ended september 27 2008 other is $ 882 ; the ending balance of twelve months ended september 27 2008 is $ 1309 ;

Answer: 128.7%

Question: what is the growth rate in advertising costs from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 33.6%

the company does not have any direct-response advertising .

Answer: 33.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in advertising costs from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 33.6%.

Rejected response: 128.7%.

Question: what is the growth rate in advertising costs from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 33.6%

other the ending balance of twelve months ended september 27 2008 other is $ 882 ; the ending balance of twelve months ended september 27 2008 is $ 1309 ;

advertising costs advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred .

advertising costs , which include trade shows and conventions , were approximately $ 15281 , $ 6683 and $ 5003 for fiscal 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and were included in selling and marketing expense in the consolidated statements of operations. .

Answer: 33.6%

Question: what is the growth rate in advertising costs from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 128.7%

Answer: 128.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by how much did total regulatory liabilities increase from 2017 to 2018?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 14.6%.

Rejected response: 2.6%.

AWK || by how much did total regulatory liabilities increase <TIME>?

Question: by how much did total regulatory liabilities increase from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: 14.6%

the total regulatory liabilities of 2018 is $ 1907 ; the total regulatory liabilities of 2017 is $ 1664 ;

regulatory liabilities regulatory liabilities generally represent amounts that are probable of being credited or refunded to customers through the rate-making process .

the following table provides the composition of regulatory liabilities as of december 31: .

surcharges collected were $ 8 million and $ 7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .

as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization on the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 .

Answer: 14.6%

Question: by how much did total regulatory liabilities increase from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 2.6%

the total regulatory liabilities of 2015 is $ 402 ; the total regulatory liabilities of 2014 is $ 392 ;

regulatory liabilities the regulatory liabilities generally represent probable future reductions in revenues associated with amounts that are to be credited or refunded to customers through the rate-making process .

The other of 2015 is 32 ; The other of 2014 is 37 ;

in addition to the authorized costs , the company expects to incur additional costs totaling $ 34 , which will be recovered from contributions made by the california state coastal conservancy .

as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 .

Answer: 2.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by how much did total regulatory liabilities increase from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.6%.

Rejected response: 14.6%.

Question: by how much did total regulatory liabilities increase from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 2.6%

in addition to the authorized costs , the company expects to incur additional costs totaling $ 34 , which will be recovered from contributions made by the california state coastal conservancy .

as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 .

the total regulatory liabilities of 2015 is $ 402 ; the total regulatory liabilities of 2014 is $ 392 ;

Answer: 2.6%

Question: by how much did total regulatory liabilities increase from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: 14.6%

surcharges collected were $ 8 million and $ 7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .

as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization on the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 .

the total regulatory liabilities of 2018 is $ 1907 ; the total regulatory liabilities of 2017 is $ 1664 ;

Answer: 14.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 16.7%.

Rejected response: 2%.

TFX || what is the rate of return of an investment in teleflex incorporated <TIME>?

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 16.7%

company / index the teleflex incorporated of 2009 is 100 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2010 is 102 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2011 is 119 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2012 is 142 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2013 is 190 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2014 is 235 ;

company / index The s&p 500 index of 2009 is 100 ; The s&p 500 index of 2010 is 115 ; The s&p 500 index of 2011 is 117 ; The s&p 500 index of 2012 is 136 ; The s&p 500 index of 2013 is 180 ; The s&p 500 index of 2014 is 205 ;

the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2009 and that all dividends were reinvested .

stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index .

Answer: 16.7%

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 2%

Answer: 2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2%.

Rejected response: 16.7%.

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 2%

stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index .

the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2009 and that all dividends were reinvested .

company / index the teleflex incorporated of 2009 is 100 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2010 is 102 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2011 is 119 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2012 is 142 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2013 is 190 ; the teleflex incorporated of 2014 is 235 ;

Answer: 2%

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 16.7%

Answer: 16.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in unrealized tax benefits from 2008 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -4085.

Rejected response: -8782.

ADI || what is the net change in unrealized tax benefits <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in unrealized tax benefits from 2008 to 2011?

Answer: -4085

balance november 1 2008 the balance october 29 2011 of $ 13750 is $ 9665 ;

the following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of unrealized tax benefits for fiscal 2009 through fiscal 2011. .

balance november 1 2008 The additions for tax positions of 2009 of $ 13750 is 4411 ;

balance november 1 2008 the additions for tax positions of 2010 of $ 13750 is 286 ;

balance november 1 2008 the balance october 30 2010 of $ 13750 is $ 18447 ;

Answer: -4085

Question: what is the net change in unrealized tax benefits during 2010?

Answer: -8782

balance november 1 2008 the additions for tax positions related to prior years of $ 13750 is 9265 ;

balance november 1 2008 the reductions for tax positions related to prior years of $ 13750 is -17677 ( 17677 ) ;

balance november 1 2008 the settlements with taxing authorities of $ 13750 is -370 ( 370 ) ;

Answer: -8782


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in unrealized tax benefits during 2010?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -8782.

Rejected response: -4085.

Question: what is the net change in unrealized tax benefits during 2010?

Answer: -8782

balance november 1 2008 the additions for tax positions related to prior years of $ 13750 is 9265 ;

balance november 1 2008 the reductions for tax positions related to prior years of $ 13750 is -17677 ( 17677 ) ;

balance november 1 2008 the settlements with taxing authorities of $ 13750 is -370 ( 370 ) ;

Answer: -8782

Question: what is the net change in unrealized tax benefits from 2008 to 2011?

Answer: -4085

balance november 1 2008 the additions for tax positions of 2010 of $ 13750 is 286 ;

balance november 1 2008 the balance october 30 2010 of $ 13750 is $ 18447 ;

balance november 1 2008 the balance october 29 2011 of $ 13750 is $ 9665 ;

Answer: -4085


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value per share of espp share purchase options from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1.6%.

Rejected response: 10.5%.

AMT || what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value per share of espp share purchase options <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value per share of espp share purchase options from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -1.6%

the weighted average fair value per share of espp share purchase options during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was $ 14.83 , $ 13.42 and $ 13.64 , respectively .

The weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2014 is 0.09% ( 0.09 % ) ; The weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2013 is 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) ; The weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2012 is 0.08% ( 0.08 % ) ;

The weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price of 2014 is 14.14% ( 14.14 % ) ; The weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price of 2013 is 12.88% ( 12.88 % ) ; The weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price of 2012 is 33.54% ( 33.54 % ) ;

the weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price of 2014 is 14.14% ( 14.14 % ) ; the weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price of 2013 is 12.88% ( 12.88 % ) ; the weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price of 2012 is 33.54% ( 33.54 % ) ;

dividends on shares of mandatory convertible preferred stock are payable on a cumulative basis when , as and if declared by the company 2019s board of directors ( or an authorized committee thereof ) at an annual rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) on the liquidation preference of $ 100.00 per share , on february 15 , may 15 , august 15 and november 15 of each year , commencing on august 15 , 2014 to , and including , may 15 , 2017 .

Answer: -1.6%

Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value per share of espp share purchase options from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 10.5%

the weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2014 is 0.09% ( 0.09 % ) ; the weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2013 is 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) ; the weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2012 is 0.08% ( 0.08 % ) ;

Answer: 10.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value per share of espp share purchase options from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10.5%.

Rejected response: -1.6%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value per share of espp share purchase options from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 10.5%

the weighted average fair value per share of espp share purchase options during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was $ 14.83 , $ 13.42 and $ 13.64 , respectively .

the weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2014 is 0.09% ( 0.09 % ) ; the weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2013 is 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) ; the weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2012 is 0.08% ( 0.08 % ) ;

the weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price of 2014 is 14.14% ( 14.14 % ) ; the weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price of 2013 is 12.88% ( 12.88 % ) ; the weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price of 2012 is 33.54% ( 33.54 % ) ;

Answer: 10.5%

Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value per share of espp share purchase options from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -1.6%

dividends on shares of mandatory convertible preferred stock are payable on a cumulative basis when , as and if declared by the company 2019s board of directors ( or an authorized committee thereof ) at an annual rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) on the liquidation preference of $ 100.00 per share , on february 15 , may 15 , august 15 and november 15 of each year , commencing on august 15 , 2014 to , and including , may 15 , 2017 .

Answer: -1.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in pmi's share price from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.4%.

Rejected response: 8.5%.

PM || what is the growth rate in pmi's share price <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in pmi's share price from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 13.4%

date the december 31 2014 of pmi is $ 106.20 ; the december 31 2014 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 132.50 ; the december 31 2014 of s&p 500 index is $ 150.50 ;

date the december 31 2015 of pmi is $ 120.40 ; the december 31 2015 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 143.50 ; the december 31 2015 of s&p 500 index is $ 152.60 ;

date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

date the december 31 2013 of pmi is $ 108.50 ; the december 31 2013 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 122.80 ; the december 31 2013 of s&p 500 index is $ 132.40 ;

Answer: 13.4%

Question: what is the growth rate in pmi's share price from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 8.5%

subtract(108.50, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

date the december 31 2012 of pmi is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2012 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2012 of s&p 500 index is $ 100.00 ;

the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .

Answer: 8.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in pmi's share price from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 8.5%.

Rejected response: 13.4%.

Question: what is the growth rate in pmi's share price from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 8.5%

subtract(108.50, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .

date the december 31 2012 of pmi is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2012 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 100.00 ; the december 31 2012 of s&p 500 index is $ 100.00 ;

date the december 31 2013 of pmi is $ 108.50 ; the december 31 2013 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 122.80 ; the december 31 2013 of s&p 500 index is $ 132.40 ;

Answer: 8.5%

Question: what is the growth rate in pmi's share price from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 13.4%

date the december 31 2014 of pmi is $ 106.20 ; the december 31 2014 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 132.50 ; the december 31 2014 of s&p 500 index is $ 150.50 ;

date the december 31 2015 of pmi is $ 120.40 ; the december 31 2015 of pmi peer group ( 1 ) is $ 143.50 ; the december 31 2015 of s&p 500 index is $ 152.60 ;

Answer: 13.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the average net earnings in millions from 2002 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1435.

Rejected response: 719.6.

LMT || what was the average net earnings in millions <TIME>?

Question: what was the average net earnings in millions from 2002 to 2006?

Answer: 1435

( in millions ) the net earnings of 2006 is $ 2529 ; the net earnings of 2005 is $ 1825 ; the net earnings of 2004 is $ 1266 ; the net earnings of 2003 is $ 1053 ; the net earnings of 2002 is $ 500 ;

( in millions ) The average debt2 5 of 2006 is $ 4727 ; The average debt2 5 of 2005 is $ 5077 ; The average debt2 5 of 2004 is $ 5932 ; The average debt2 5 of 2003 is $ 6612 ; The average debt2 5 of 2002 is $ 7491 ;

( in millions ) The average equity3 5 of 2006 is 7686 ; The average equity3 5 of 2005 is 7590 ; The average equity3 5 of 2004 is 7015 ; The average equity3 5 of 2003 is 6170 ; The average equity3 5 of 2002 is 6853 ;

( in millions ) the average debt2 5 of 2006 is $ 4727 ; the average debt2 5 of 2005 is $ 5077 ; the average debt2 5 of 2004 is $ 5932 ; the average debt2 5 of 2003 is $ 6612 ; the average debt2 5 of 2002 is $ 7491 ;

5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter. .

Answer: 1435

Question: what was the average net earnings in millions from 2001 to 2005?

Answer: 719.6

( in millions ) the net earnings of 2005 is $ 1825 ; the net earnings of 2004 is $ 1266 ; the net earnings of 2003 is $ 1053 ; the net earnings of 2002 is $ 500 ; the net earnings of 2001 is $ -1046 ( 1046 ) ;

( in millions ) The average debt2 5 of 2005 is $ 5077 ; The average debt2 5 of 2004 is $ 5932 ; The average debt2 5 of 2003 is $ 6612 ; The average debt2 5 of 2002 is $ 7491 ; The average debt2 5 of 2001 is $ 8782 ;

( in millions ) the average debt2 5 of 2005 is $ 5077 ; the average debt2 5 of 2004 is $ 5932 ; the average debt2 5 of 2003 is $ 6612 ; the average debt2 5 of 2002 is $ 7491 ; the average debt2 5 of 2001 is $ 8782 ;

( in millions ) the average equity3 5 of 2005 is 7590 ; the average equity3 5 of 2004 is 7015 ; the average equity3 5 of 2003 is 6170 ; the average equity3 5 of 2002 is 6853 ; the average equity3 5 of 2001 is 7221 ;

Answer: 719.6


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the average net earnings in millions from 2001 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 719.6.

Rejected response: 1435.

Question: what was the average net earnings in millions from 2001 to 2005?

Answer: 719.6

( in millions ) the net earnings of 2005 is $ 1825 ; the net earnings of 2004 is $ 1266 ; the net earnings of 2003 is $ 1053 ; the net earnings of 2002 is $ 500 ; the net earnings of 2001 is $ -1046 ( 1046 ) ;

( in millions ) the average debt2 5 of 2005 is $ 5077 ; the average debt2 5 of 2004 is $ 5932 ; the average debt2 5 of 2003 is $ 6612 ; the average debt2 5 of 2002 is $ 7491 ; the average debt2 5 of 2001 is $ 8782 ;

( in millions ) the average equity3 5 of 2005 is 7590 ; the average equity3 5 of 2004 is 7015 ; the average equity3 5 of 2003 is 6170 ; the average equity3 5 of 2002 is 6853 ; the average equity3 5 of 2001 is 7221 ;

Answer: 719.6

Question: what was the average net earnings in millions from 2002 to 2006?

Answer: 1435

( in millions ) the net earnings of 2006 is $ 2529 ; the net earnings of 2005 is $ 1825 ; the net earnings of 2004 is $ 1266 ; the net earnings of 2003 is $ 1053 ; the net earnings of 2002 is $ 500 ;

( in millions ) the average debt2 5 of 2006 is $ 4727 ; the average debt2 5 of 2005 is $ 5077 ; the average debt2 5 of 2004 is $ 5932 ; the average debt2 5 of 2003 is $ 6612 ; the average debt2 5 of 2002 is $ 7491 ;

5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter. .

Answer: 1435


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of net sales in fiscal 2013 where due to private brands?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: 26%.

CAG || what percent of net sales in fiscal <TIME> where due to private brands?

Question: what percent of net sales in fiscal 2013 where due to private brands?

Answer: 13%

( $ in millions ) reporting segment the private brands of fiscal 2014 net sales is 4195.7 ; the private brands of fiscal 2013 net sales is 1808.2 ; the private brands of % ( % ) inc ( dec ) is 132% ( 132 % ) ;

( $ in millions ) reporting segment the total of fiscal 2014 net sales is $ 15843.6 ; the total of fiscal 2013 net sales is $ 13469.3 ; the total of % ( % ) inc ( dec ) is 18% ( 18 % ) ;

fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013 net sales ( $ in millions ) reporting segment fiscal 2014 net sales fiscal 2013 net sales .

Answer: 13%

Question: what percent of net sales in fiscal 2014 where due to private brands?

Answer: 26%

Answer: 26%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of net sales in fiscal 2014 where due to private brands?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 26%.

Rejected response: 13%.

Question: what percent of net sales in fiscal 2014 where due to private brands?

Answer: 26%

fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013 net sales ( $ in millions ) reporting segment fiscal 2014 net sales fiscal 2013 net sales .

( $ in millions ) reporting segment the private brands of fiscal 2014 net sales is 4195.7 ; the private brands of fiscal 2013 net sales is 1808.2 ; the private brands of % ( % ) inc ( dec ) is 132% ( 132 % ) ;

( $ in millions ) reporting segment the total of fiscal 2014 net sales is $ 15843.6 ; the total of fiscal 2013 net sales is $ 13469.3 ; the total of % ( % ) inc ( dec ) is 18% ( 18 % ) ;

Answer: 26%

Question: what percent of net sales in fiscal 2013 where due to private brands?

Answer: 13%

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in ccg operating income in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -20.9%.

Rejected response: 30.4.

INTC || what is the growth rate in ccg operating income <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in ccg operating income in 2015?

Answer: -20.9%

( in millions ) the $ 8166 of operating income reconciliation is 2015 ccg operating income ;

( in millions ) the $ 10327 of operating income reconciliation is 2014 ccg operating income ;

( in millions ) The $ 10646 of operating income reconciliation is 2016 ccg operating income ;

( in millions ) the $ 10646 of operating income reconciliation is 2016 ccg operating income ;

Answer: -20.9%

Question: what is the growth rate in ccg operating income in 2016?

Answer: 30.4

( in millions ) The $ 10327 of operating income reconciliation is 2014 ccg operating income ;

Answer: 30.4


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in ccg operating income in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 30.4.

Rejected response: -20.9%.

Question: what is the growth rate in ccg operating income in 2016?

Answer: 30.4

( in millions ) the $ 10646 of operating income reconciliation is 2016 ccg operating income ;

( in millions ) the $ 8166 of operating income reconciliation is 2015 ccg operating income ;

( in millions ) the $ 10327 of operating income reconciliation is 2014 ccg operating income ;

Answer: 30.4

Question: what is the growth rate in ccg operating income in 2015?

Answer: -20.9%

Answer: -20.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what portion of the total purchased shares presented in the table was purchased during november 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-11-01 00:00:00 to 2008-12-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 22.8%.

Rejected response: 77.0%.

FITB || what portion of the total purchased shares presented in the table was purchased <TIME>?

Question: what portion of the total purchased shares presented in the table was purchased during november 2008?

Answer: 22.8%

period the november 2008 of sharespurchased ( a ) is 7526 ; the november 2008 of averagepricepaid pershare is - ; the november 2008 of sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms is - ; the november 2008 of maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms is 19201518 ;

period the total of sharespurchased ( a ) is 32960 ; the total of averagepricepaid pershare is $ - ; the total of sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms is - ; the total of maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms is 19201518 ;

issuer purchases of equity securities period shares purchased average paid per shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum shares that may be purchased under the plans or programs .

( a ) the bancorp repurchased 25394 , 7526 and 40 shares during october , november and december of 2008 in connection with various employee compensation plans of the bancorp .

Answer: 22.8%

Question: what portion of the total purchased shares presented in the table was purchased during october 2008?

Answer: 77.0%

period the october 2008 of sharespurchased ( a ) is 25394 ; the october 2008 of averagepricepaid pershare is $ - ; the october 2008 of sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms is - ; the october 2008 of maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms is 19201518 ;

Answer: 77.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what portion of the total purchased shares presented in the table was purchased during october 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-10-01 00:00:00 to 2008-11-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 77.0%.

Rejected response: 22.8%.

Question: what portion of the total purchased shares presented in the table was purchased during october 2008?

Answer: 77.0%

period the october 2008 of sharespurchased ( a ) is 25394 ; the october 2008 of averagepricepaid pershare is $ - ; the october 2008 of sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms is - ; the october 2008 of maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms is 19201518 ;

period the total of sharespurchased ( a ) is 32960 ; the total of averagepricepaid pershare is $ - ; the total of sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms is - ; the total of maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms is 19201518 ;

( a ) the bancorp repurchased 25394 , 7526 and 40 shares during october , november and december of 2008 in connection with various employee compensation plans of the bancorp .

Answer: 77.0%

Question: what portion of the total purchased shares presented in the table was purchased during november 2008?

Answer: 22.8%

period the november 2008 of sharespurchased ( a ) is 7526 ; the november 2008 of averagepricepaid pershare is - ; the november 2008 of sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms is - ; the november 2008 of maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms is 19201518 ;

Answer: 22.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in total accumulated other comprehensive losses in millions from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2636.

Rejected response: -586.

PM || what was the change in total accumulated other comprehensive losses in millions <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in total accumulated other comprehensive losses in millions from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -2636

( losses ) earnings ( in millions ) the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of ( losses ) earnings 2014 is $ -6826 ( 6826 ) ; the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of ( losses ) earnings 2013 is $ -4190 ( 4190 ) ; the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of 2012 is $ -3604 ( 3604 ) ;

accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .

reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 .

in addition , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of a subsidiary .

Answer: -2636

Question: what was the change in total accumulated other comprehensive losses in millions from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -586

( losses ) earnings ( in millions ) the currency translation adjustments of ( losses ) earnings 2014 is $ -3929 ( 3929 ) ; the currency translation adjustments of ( losses ) earnings 2013 is $ -2207 ( 2207 ) ; the currency translation adjustments of 2012 is $ -331 ( 331 ) ;

Answer: -586


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in total accumulated other comprehensive losses in millions from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -586.

Rejected response: -2636.

Question: what was the change in total accumulated other comprehensive losses in millions from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -586

accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .

( losses ) earnings ( in millions ) the currency translation adjustments of ( losses ) earnings 2014 is $ -3929 ( 3929 ) ; the currency translation adjustments of ( losses ) earnings 2013 is $ -2207 ( 2207 ) ; the currency translation adjustments of 2012 is $ -331 ( 331 ) ;

( losses ) earnings ( in millions ) the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of ( losses ) earnings 2014 is $ -6826 ( 6826 ) ; the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of ( losses ) earnings 2013 is $ -4190 ( 4190 ) ; the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of 2012 is $ -3604 ( 3604 ) ;

Answer: -586

Question: what was the change in total accumulated other comprehensive losses in millions from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -2636

in addition , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of a subsidiary .

Answer: -2636


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: as of december 31 , 2016 what was the ratio of receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations to payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: .93.

Rejected response: .95.

C || as of december 31 , <TIME> what was the ratio of receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations to payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations?

Question: as of december 31 , 2016 what was the ratio of receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations to payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations?

Answer: .93

in millions of dollars the receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations of december 31 , 2016 is 18513 ; the receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations of december 31 , 2015 is 17248 ;

in millions of dollars the payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations of december 31 , 2016 is 19915 ; the payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations of december 31 , 2015 is 18069 ;

payables to brokers , dealers , and clearing organizations 19915 18069 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 57152 $ 53722 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

in millions of dollars the receivables from customers of december 31 , 2016 is $ 10374 ; the receivables from customers of december 31 , 2015 is $ 10435 ;

Answer: .93

Question: as of december 31 , 2015 what was the ratio of receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations to payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations?

Answer: .95

Answer: .95


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: as of december 31 , 2015 what was the ratio of receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations to payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: .95.

Rejected response: .93.

Question: as of december 31 , 2015 what was the ratio of receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations to payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations?

Answer: .95

in millions of dollars the receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations of december 31 , 2016 is 18513 ; the receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations of december 31 , 2015 is 17248 ;

in millions of dollars the payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations of december 31 , 2016 is 19915 ; the payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations of december 31 , 2015 is 18069 ;

payables to brokers , dealers , and clearing organizations 19915 18069 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 57152 $ 53722 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Answer: .95

Question: as of december 31 , 2016 what was the ratio of receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations to payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations?

Answer: .93

in millions of dollars the receivables from customers of december 31 , 2016 is $ 10374 ; the receivables from customers of december 31 , 2015 is $ 10435 ;

Answer: .93


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total value of granted options in 2007 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 153.8.

Rejected response: 71.4.

ILMN || what is the total value of granted options <TIME> , in millions?

Question: what is the total value of granted options in 2007 , in millions?

Answer: 153.8

the granted of options is 3784508 ; the granted of weighted- average exercise price is $ 40.64 ;

The granted of options is 2621050 ; The granted of weighted- average exercise price is $ 27.24 ;

The granted of options is 2992300 ; The granted of weighted- average exercise price is $ 10.02 ;

the granted of options is 2992300 ; the granted of weighted- average exercise price is $ 10.02 ;

the granted of options is 2621050 ; the granted of weighted- average exercise price is $ 27.24 ;

Answer: 153.8

Question: what is the total value of granted options in 2006 , in millions?

Answer: 71.4

The outstanding at january 1 2006 of options is 7325431 ; The outstanding at january 1 2006 of weighted- average exercise price is $ 7.96 ;

Answer: 71.4


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total value of granted options in 2006 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 71.4.

Rejected response: 153.8.

Question: what is the total value of granted options in 2006 , in millions?

Answer: 71.4

the granted of options is 2992300 ; the granted of weighted- average exercise price is $ 10.02 ;

the granted of options is 2621050 ; the granted of weighted- average exercise price is $ 27.24 ;

the granted of options is 3784508 ; the granted of weighted- average exercise price is $ 40.64 ;

Answer: 71.4

Question: what is the total value of granted options in 2007 , in millions?

Answer: 153.8

Answer: 153.8


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the net unrecognized tax benefit in 2012 compare to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17.8%.

Rejected response: 18.8%.

GS || what is the percentage change in the net unrecognized tax benefit <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the net unrecognized tax benefit in 2012 compare to 2011?

Answer: 17.8%

in millions the net unrecognized tax benefit2 of as of december 2012 is $ 1552 ; the net unrecognized tax benefit2 of as of december 2011 is $ 1318 ; the net unrecognized tax benefit2 of as of december 2010 is $ 1109 ;

related deferred income tax asset 1 685 569 972 net unrecognized tax benefit 2 $ 1552 $ 1318 $ 1109 1 .

it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits could change significantly during the twelve months subsequent to december 2012 due to potential audit settlements , however , at this time it is not possible to estimate any potential change .

in millions the balance beginning of year of as of december 2012 is $ 1887 ; the balance beginning of year of as of december 2011 is $ 2081 ; the balance beginning of year of as of december 2010 is $ 1925 ;

in millions the balance end of year of as of december 2012 is $ 2237 ; the balance end of year of as of december 2011 is $ 1887 ; the balance end of year of as of december 2010 is $ 2081 ;

Answer: 17.8%

Question: what is the percentage change in the net unrecognized tax benefit in 2011 compare to 2010?

Answer: 18.8%

if recognized , the net tax benefit would reduce the firm 2019s effective income tax rate .

Answer: 18.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the net unrecognized tax benefit in 2011 compare to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18.8%.

Rejected response: 17.8%.

Question: what is the percentage change in the net unrecognized tax benefit in 2011 compare to 2010?

Answer: 18.8%

in millions the balance beginning of year of as of december 2012 is $ 1887 ; the balance beginning of year of as of december 2011 is $ 2081 ; the balance beginning of year of as of december 2010 is $ 1925 ;

in millions the balance end of year of as of december 2012 is $ 2237 ; the balance end of year of as of december 2011 is $ 1887 ; the balance end of year of as of december 2010 is $ 2081 ;

in millions the net unrecognized tax benefit2 of as of december 2012 is $ 1552 ; the net unrecognized tax benefit2 of as of december 2011 is $ 1318 ; the net unrecognized tax benefit2 of as of december 2010 is $ 1109 ;

Answer: 18.8%

Question: what is the percentage change in the net unrecognized tax benefit in 2012 compare to 2011?

Answer: 17.8%

Answer: 17.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what were total costs incurred in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3362.

Rejected response: 7680.

MRO || what were total costs incurred <TIME> , <TIME> and <TIME> relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , in millions?

Question: what were total costs incurred in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , in millions?

Answer: 3362

costs incurred in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 1107 million , $ 1463 million and $ 792 million .

the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2011: .

changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2011 , 395 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 10 mmboe from december 31 , 2010 .

beginning of year the end of year of 405 is 395 ;

Answer: 3362

Question: what were total costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , in millions?

Answer: 7680

costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 3149 million , $ 2536 million and $ 1995 million .

the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2014 : ( mmboe ) .

during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc .

beginning of year the end of year of 627 is 728 ;

as of december 31 , 2014 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped crude oil and condensate , ngls , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2015 through 2019 are projected to be $ 2915 million , $ 2598 million , $ 2493 million , $ 2669 million and $ 2745 million. .

Answer: 7680


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what were total costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7680.

Rejected response: 3362.

Question: what were total costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , in millions?

Answer: 7680

beginning of year the end of year of 627 is 728 ;

costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 3149 million , $ 2536 million and $ 1995 million .

as of december 31 , 2014 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped crude oil and condensate , ngls , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2015 through 2019 are projected to be $ 2915 million , $ 2598 million , $ 2493 million , $ 2669 million and $ 2745 million. .

Answer: 7680

Question: what were total costs incurred in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , in millions?

Answer: 3362

the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2011: .

beginning of year the end of year of 405 is 395 ;

costs incurred in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 1107 million , $ 1463 million and $ 792 million .

Answer: 3362


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference between the highest and the lowest base salary in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1024996.

Rejected response: 1077793.

ETR || what is the difference between the highest and the lowest base salary <TIME>?

Question: what is the difference between the highest and the lowest base salary in 2007?

Answer: 1024996

named executive officer the j . wayne leonard of 2007 base salary is $ 1230000 ; the j . wayne leonard of percentage increase is 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ; the j . wayne leonard of 2008 base salary is $ 1291500 ;

named executive officer the haley fisackerly of 2007 base salary is $ 205004 ; the haley fisackerly of percentage increase is 32.9% ( 32.9 % ) ; the haley fisackerly of 2008 base salary is $ 275000 ;

named executive officer 2007 base salary percentage increase 2008 base salary .

named executive officer the theodore h . bunting jr . of 2007 base salary is $ 325000 ; the theodore h . bunting jr . of percentage increase is 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) ; the theodore h . bunting jr . of 2008 base salary is $ 341900 ;

Answer: 1024996

Question: what is the difference between the highest and the lowest base salary in 2008?

Answer: 1077793

named executive officer the jay a . lewis of 2007 base salary is $ 207000 ; the jay a . lewis of percentage increase is 3.24% ( 3.24 % ) ; the jay a . lewis of 2008 base salary is $ 213707 ;

Answer: 1077793


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference between the highest and the lowest base salary in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1077793.

Rejected response: 1024996.

Question: what is the difference between the highest and the lowest base salary in 2008?

Answer: 1077793

named executive officer the j . wayne leonard of 2007 base salary is $ 1230000 ; the j . wayne leonard of percentage increase is 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ; the j . wayne leonard of 2008 base salary is $ 1291500 ;

named executive officer the haley fisackerly of 2007 base salary is $ 205004 ; the haley fisackerly of percentage increase is 32.9% ( 32.9 % ) ; the haley fisackerly of 2008 base salary is $ 275000 ;

named executive officer the jay a . lewis of 2007 base salary is $ 207000 ; the jay a . lewis of percentage increase is 3.24% ( 3.24 % ) ; the jay a . lewis of 2008 base salary is $ 213707 ;

Answer: 1077793

Question: what is the difference between the highest and the lowest base salary in 2007?

Answer: 1024996

named executive officer the theodore h . bunting jr . of 2007 base salary is $ 325000 ; the theodore h . bunting jr . of percentage increase is 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) ; the theodore h . bunting jr . of 2008 base salary is $ 341900 ;

Answer: 1024996


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total goodwill carrying value from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 0%.

Rejected response: 5%.

IPG || what was the percentage change in total goodwill carrying value <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in total goodwill carrying value from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 0%

the balance as of december 31 2007 of ian is 2789.7 ; the balance as of december 31 2007 of cmg is 441.9 ; the balance as of december 31 2007 of total is 3231.6 ;

the balance as of december 31 2008 of ian is $ 2790.0 ; the balance as of december 31 2008 of cmg is $ 430.9 ; the balance as of december 31 2008 of total is $ 3220.9 ;

the changes in the carrying value of goodwill by segment for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 are as follows: .

the balance as of december 31 2006 of ian is $ 2632.5 ; the balance as of december 31 2006 of cmg is $ 435.3 ; the balance as of december 31 2006 of total is $ 3067.8 ;

Answer: 0%

Question: what was the percentage change in total goodwill carrying value from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 5%

Answer: 5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total goodwill carrying value from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5%.

Rejected response: 0%.

Question: what was the percentage change in total goodwill carrying value from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 5%

the balance as of december 31 2006 of ian is $ 2632.5 ; the balance as of december 31 2006 of cmg is $ 435.3 ; the balance as of december 31 2006 of total is $ 3067.8 ;

the balance as of december 31 2007 of ian is 2789.7 ; the balance as of december 31 2007 of cmg is 441.9 ; the balance as of december 31 2007 of total is 3231.6 ;

the balance as of december 31 2008 of ian is $ 2790.0 ; the balance as of december 31 2008 of cmg is $ 430.9 ; the balance as of december 31 2008 of total is $ 3220.9 ;

Answer: 5%

Question: what was the percentage change in total goodwill carrying value from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 0%

Answer: 0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total long-term debt reported in the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5174.

Rejected response: 6400.

HIG || what is the total long-term debt reported in the balance sheet as of december 31 , <TIME>?

Question: what is the total long-term debt reported in the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2016?

Answer: 5174

2017 - current maturities the 2018 of $ 416 is $ 320 ;

2017 - current maturities the 2019 of $ 416 is $ 413 ;

2017 - current maturities the 2020 of $ 416 is $ 500 ;

2017 - current maturities the 2021 of $ 416 is $ 2014 ;

2017 - current maturities the thereafter of $ 416 is $ 3525 ;

Answer: 5174

Question: what is the total long-term debt reported in the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013?

Answer: 6400

Answer: 6400


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total long-term debt reported in the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6400.

Rejected response: 5174.

Question: what is the total long-term debt reported in the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013?

Answer: 6400

Answer: 6400

Question: what is the total long-term debt reported in the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2016?

Answer: 5174

2017 - current maturities the 2018 of $ 416 is $ 320 ;

2017 - current maturities the 2019 of $ 416 is $ 413 ;

2017 - current maturities the 2020 of $ 416 is $ 500 ;

2017 - current maturities the 2021 of $ 416 is $ 2014 ;

2017 - current maturities the thereafter of $ 416 is $ 3525 ;

Answer: 5174


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in sales from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1%.

Rejected response: 7%.

FTV || what was the percentage change in sales <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in sales from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 1%

( $ in millions ) the sales of for the year ended december 31 2017 is $ 6656.0 ; the sales of for the year ended december 31 2016 is $ 6224.3 ; the sales of for the year ended december 31 2015 is $ 6178.8 ;

2022 higher 2017 sales volumes , incremental year-over-year cost savings associated with restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives , costs associated with various growth investments made in 2016 and changes in currency exchange rates , partially offset by incremental year-over-year costs associated with various product development and sales and marketing growth investments : 60 basis points year-over-year operating profit margin comparisons were unfavorably impacted by : 2022 the incremental year-over-year net dilutive effect of acquired businesses : 20 basis points 2016 compared to 2015 year-over-year price increases in the segment contributed 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) to sales growth during 2016 as compared to 2015 and are reflected as a component of the change in sales from existing businesses .

sales from existing businesses in the segment 2019s automation & specialty components business declined at a low-single digit rate during 2016 as compared to 2015 .

( $ in millions ) the cost of sales of for the year ended december 31 2017 is -3357.5 ( 3357.5 ) ; the cost of sales of for the year ended december 31 2016 is -3191.5 ( 3191.5 ) ; the cost of sales of for the year ended december 31 2015 is -3178.8 ( 3178.8 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the gross profit of for the year ended december 31 2017 is 3298.5 ; the gross profit of for the year ended december 31 2016 is 3032.8 ; the gross profit of for the year ended december 31 2015 is 3000.0 ;

Answer: 1%

Question: what was the percentage change in sales from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 7%

the year-over-year increase in cost of sales during 2017 as compared to 2016 is due primarily to the impact of higher year- over-year sales volumes and changes in currency exchange rates partly offset by incremental year-over-year cost savings .

Answer: 7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in sales from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7%.

Rejected response: 1%.

Question: what was the percentage change in sales from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 7%

( $ in millions ) the sales of for the year ended december 31 2017 is $ 6656.0 ; the sales of for the year ended december 31 2016 is $ 6224.3 ; the sales of for the year ended december 31 2015 is $ 6178.8 ;

( $ in millions ) the cost of sales of for the year ended december 31 2017 is -3357.5 ( 3357.5 ) ; the cost of sales of for the year ended december 31 2016 is -3191.5 ( 3191.5 ) ; the cost of sales of for the year ended december 31 2015 is -3178.8 ( 3178.8 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the gross profit of for the year ended december 31 2017 is 3298.5 ; the gross profit of for the year ended december 31 2016 is 3032.8 ; the gross profit of for the year ended december 31 2015 is 3000.0 ;

Answer: 7%

Question: what was the percentage change in sales from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 1%

Answer: 1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributed amounts from 2003 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -35.4%.

Rejected response: 979000.

AMT || what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributed amounts <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributed amounts from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: -35.4%

the company contributed approximately $ 533000 , $ 825000 and $ 979000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively .

retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .

the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : .

under the plan , the company matching contribution for periods prior to june 30 , 2004 was 35% ( 35 % ) up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions .

Answer: -35.4%

Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributed amounts from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: 979000

american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) stock-based compensation 2014the company complies with the provisions of sfas no .

Answer: 979000


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributed amounts from 2002 to 2003?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 979000.

Rejected response: -35.4%.

Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributed amounts from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: 979000

american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) stock-based compensation 2014the company complies with the provisions of sfas no .

the company contributed approximately $ 533000 , $ 825000 and $ 979000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively .

Answer: 979000

Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributed amounts from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: -35.4%

under the plan , the company matching contribution for periods prior to june 30 , 2004 was 35% ( 35 % ) up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions .

Answer: -35.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2013 what percentage of consumer packaging sales is attributable to north american consumer packaging net sales?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 58%.

Rejected response: 63%.

IP || <TIME> what percentage of consumer packaging sales is attributable to north american consumer packaging net sales?

Question: in 2013 what percentage of consumer packaging sales is attributable to north american consumer packaging net sales?

Answer: 58%

multiply(const_2, const_1000), divide(#0, 3435)

in millions the sales of 2013 is $ 3435 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 3170 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 3710 ;

north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2013 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2012 and $ 2.5 billion in 2011 .

in millions the operating profit of 2013 is 161 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 268 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 163 ;

Answer: 58%

Question: in 2012 what percentage of consumer packaging sales is attributable to north american consumer packaging net sales?

Answer: 63%

multiply(const_2, const_1000), divide(#0, 3170)

Answer: 63%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2012 what percentage of consumer packaging sales is attributable to north american consumer packaging net sales?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 63%.

Rejected response: 58%.

Question: in 2012 what percentage of consumer packaging sales is attributable to north american consumer packaging net sales?

Answer: 63%

multiply(const_2, const_1000), divide(#0, 3170)

in millions the sales of 2013 is $ 3435 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 3170 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 3710 ;

in millions the operating profit of 2013 is 161 ; the operating profit of 2012 is 268 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 163 ;

north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2013 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2012 and $ 2.5 billion in 2011 .

Answer: 63%

Question: in 2013 what percentage of consumer packaging sales is attributable to north american consumer packaging net sales?

Answer: 58%

multiply(const_2, const_1000), divide(#0, 3435)

Answer: 58%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of fiscal 2008 total net sales was due to commercial foods?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 34%.

Rejected response: 36%.

CAG || what percentage of fiscal <TIME> total net sales was due to commercial foods?

Question: what percentage of fiscal 2008 total net sales was due to commercial foods?

Answer: 34%

reporting segment the commercial foods of fiscal 2009 net sales is 4447 ; the commercial foods of fiscal 2008 net sales is 3848 ; the commercial foods of % ( % ) increase is 16% ( 16 % ) ;

reporting segment the total of fiscal 2009 net sales is $ 12426 ; the total of fiscal 2008 net sales is $ 11248 ; the total of % ( % ) increase is 11% ( 11 % ) ;

2008 net sales ( $ in millions ) reporting segment fiscal 2009 net sales fiscal 2008 net sales % (  % ) increase .

dollar relative to foreign currencies resulted in a reduction of net sales of approximately 1% ( 1 % ) as compared to fiscal 2008. .

Answer: 34%

Question: what percentage of fiscal 2009 total net sales was due to commercial foods?

Answer: 36%

reporting segment The consumer foods of fiscal 2009 net sales is $ 7979 ; The consumer foods of fiscal 2008 net sales is $ 7400 ; The consumer foods of % ( % ) increase is 8% ( 8 % ) ;

Answer: 36%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of fiscal 2009 total net sales was due to commercial foods?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 36%.

Rejected response: 34%.

Question: what percentage of fiscal 2009 total net sales was due to commercial foods?

Answer: 36%

reporting segment the commercial foods of fiscal 2009 net sales is 4447 ; the commercial foods of fiscal 2008 net sales is 3848 ; the commercial foods of % ( % ) increase is 16% ( 16 % ) ;

reporting segment the total of fiscal 2009 net sales is $ 12426 ; the total of fiscal 2008 net sales is $ 11248 ; the total of % ( % ) increase is 11% ( 11 % ) ;

dollar relative to foreign currencies resulted in a reduction of net sales of approximately 1% ( 1 % ) as compared to fiscal 2008. .

Answer: 36%

Question: what percentage of fiscal 2008 total net sales was due to commercial foods?

Answer: 34%

Answer: 34%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the exchange rate pesos to dollar in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10.89.

Rejected response: 11.01.

GPN || what is the exchange rate pesos to dollar <TIME>?

Question: what is the exchange rate pesos to dollar in 2008?

Answer: 10.89

we purchased 6.1 billion mexican pesos for $ 560.3 million during the ten months ended march 31 , 2008 and 8.1 billion mexican pesos for $ 736.0 million during fiscal 2007 from cisa .

we believe these currency transactions were executed at prevailing market exchange rates .

in addition , we expensed amounts paid to this firm of $ 0.3 million , $ 0.1 million and $ 0.5 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively .

future minimum lease payments for all noncancelable leases at may 31 , 2008 were as follows : operating leases .

Answer: 10.89

Question: what is the exchange rate pesos to dollar in 2007?

Answer: 11.01

in fiscal 2007 and 2006 , we incurred related settlement expenses , included in cost of service in the accompanying consolidated statements of income of $ 0.7 and $ 0.6 million , respectively .

Answer: 11.01


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the exchange rate pesos to dollar in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11.01.

Rejected response: 10.89.

Question: what is the exchange rate pesos to dollar in 2007?

Answer: 11.01

we purchased 6.1 billion mexican pesos for $ 560.3 million during the ten months ended march 31 , 2008 and 8.1 billion mexican pesos for $ 736.0 million during fiscal 2007 from cisa .

in addition , we expensed amounts paid to this firm of $ 0.3 million , $ 0.1 million and $ 0.5 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively .

future minimum lease payments for all noncancelable leases at may 31 , 2008 were as follows : operating leases .

Answer: 11.01

Question: what is the exchange rate pesos to dollar in 2008?

Answer: 10.89

Answer: 10.89