Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the increase in the operating income from 2010 to 2011
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10.1%.

Rejected response: 91.5%.

AON || what was the percent of the increase in the operating income <TIME>

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the operating income from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 10.1%

Explanation: the percent of the increase in the operating income increased by 10.1% from 2010 to 2011

years ended december 31 , the operating income of 2011 is 1314 ; the operating income of 2010 is 1194 ; the operating income of 2009 is 900 ;

years ended december 31, The operating margin of 2011 is 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) ; The operating margin of 2010 is 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) ; The operating margin of 2009 is 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) ;

years ended december 31, The revenue of 2011 is $ 6817 ; The revenue of 2010 is $ 6423 ; The revenue of 2009 is $ 6305 ;

in 2011 , pricing showed signs of stabilization and improvement in both our retail and reinsurance brokerage product lines and we expect this trend to slowly continue into 2012 .

weak global economic conditions have reduced our customers 2019 demand for our brokerage products , which have had a negative impact on our operational results .

Answer: 10.1%

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the operating income from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 91.5%

Explanation: the operating income increased by 91.5% from 2010 to 2011

years ended december 31 , the operating income of 2011 is 448 ; the operating income of 2010 is 234 ; the operating income of 2009 is 203 ;

operating income operating income increased $ 120 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , from 2010 to $ 1.3 billion in 2011 .

in 2011 , operating income margins in this segment were 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) , up 70 basis points from 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) in 2010 .

effective january 1 , 2012 , this line of business will be included in the results of the risk solutions segment .

Answer: 91.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percent of the increase in the operating income from 2010 to 2011
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 91.5%.

Rejected response: 10.1%.

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the operating income from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 91.5%

Explanation: the operating income increased by 91.5% from 2010 to 2011

operating income operating income increased $ 120 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , from 2010 to $ 1.3 billion in 2011 .

years ended december 31 , the operating income of 2011 is 448 ; the operating income of 2010 is 234 ; the operating income of 2009 is 203 ;

effective january 1 , 2012 , this line of business will be included in the results of the risk solutions segment .

Answer: 91.5%

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the operating income from 2010 to 2011

Answer: 10.1%

Explanation: the percent of the increase in the operating income increased by 10.1% from 2010 to 2011

years ended december 31 , the operating income of 2011 is 1314 ; the operating income of 2010 is 1194 ; the operating income of 2009 is 900 ;

in 2011 , pricing showed signs of stabilization and improvement in both our retail and reinsurance brokerage product lines and we expect this trend to slowly continue into 2012 .

weak global economic conditions have reduced our customers 2019 demand for our brokerage products , which have had a negative impact on our operational results .

Answer: 10.1%

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in advertising expense in 2003 relative to 2002?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -10.1%.

Rejected response: -12.5%.

ADBE || what is the growth rate in advertising expense <TIME> relative to <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in advertising expense in 2003 relative to 2002?

Answer: -10.1%

advertising expenses for fiscal years 2003 , 2002 , and 2001 were $ 24.0 million , $ 26.7 million and $ 30.5 million , respectively .

advertising expenses we expense all advertising costs as incurred and classify these costs under sales and marketing expense .

the table below summarizes the activity related to the accrual during fiscal 2003 : balance at november 29 , 2002 accruals payments balance at november 28 , 2003 .

balance at november 29 2002 the $ 2014 of accruals is $ 5554 ; the $ 2014 of payments is $ -2369 ( 2369 ) ; the $ 2014 of balance at november 28 2003 is $ 3185 ;

Answer: -10.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in advertising expense in 2002 relative to 2001?

Answer: -12.5%

these lease agreements were in place prior to december 31 , 2002 and are disclosed in note 14 .

Answer: -12.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in advertising expense in 2002 relative to 2001?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2003-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -12.5%.

Rejected response: -10.1%.

Question: what is the growth rate in advertising expense in 2002 relative to 2001?

Answer: -12.5%

the table below summarizes the activity related to the accrual during fiscal 2003 : balance at november 29 , 2002 accruals payments balance at november 28 , 2003 .

advertising expenses we expense all advertising costs as incurred and classify these costs under sales and marketing expense .

advertising expenses for fiscal years 2003 , 2002 , and 2001 were $ 24.0 million , $ 26.7 million and $ 30.5 million , respectively .

Answer: -12.5%

Question: what is the growth rate in advertising expense in 2003 relative to 2002?

Answer: -10.1%

balance at november 29 2002 the $ 2014 of accruals is $ 5554 ; the $ 2014 of payments is $ -2369 ( 2369 ) ; the $ 2014 of balance at november 28 2003 is $ 3185 ;

Answer: -10.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the dollar amount in millions for net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2014 due to the commercial portfolio?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 193.44.

Rejected response: 760.35.

PNC || what was the dollar amount in millions for net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , <TIME> due to the commercial portfolio?

Question: what was the dollar amount in millions for net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2014 due to the commercial portfolio?

Answer: 193.44

in millions the net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable ( a ) of 2014 is 208 ; the net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable ( a ) of 2013 is 613 ;

the cash flow re-estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the allowance associated with the purchased impaired loans .

( a ) approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2014 were within the commercial portfolio as compared to 37% ( 37 % ) for year ended december 31 , 2013 .

Answer: 193.44

Question: what was the dollar amount in millions for net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2013 due to the commercial portfolio?

Answer: 760.35

in millions the december 31 of 2014 is $ 1558 ; the december 31 of 2013 is $ 2055 ;

Answer: 760.35


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the dollar amount in millions for net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2013 due to the commercial portfolio?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 760.35.

Rejected response: 193.44.

Question: what was the dollar amount in millions for net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2013 due to the commercial portfolio?

Answer: 760.35

the cash flow re-estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the allowance associated with the purchased impaired loans .

in millions the net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable ( a ) of 2014 is 208 ; the net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable ( a ) of 2013 is 613 ;

in millions the december 31 of 2014 is $ 1558 ; the december 31 of 2013 is $ 2055 ;

( a ) approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2014 were within the commercial portfolio as compared to 37% ( 37 % ) for year ended december 31 , 2013 .

Answer: 760.35

Question: what was the dollar amount in millions for net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2014 due to the commercial portfolio?

Answer: 193.44

Answer: 193.44


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of derivative receivables was junk rated in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18.

Rejected response: 19%.

JPM || what percentage of derivative receivables was junk rated <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of derivative receivables was junk rated in 2012?

Answer: 18

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 9636 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral is 16 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of exposure net of all collateral is 10545 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral is 15 ;

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 1283 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral is 2 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of exposure net of all collateral is 2488 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral is 4 ;

ratings profile of derivative receivables .

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the total of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is $ 61325 ; the total of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the total of exposure net of all collateral is $ 70670 ; the total of % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral is 100% ( 100 % ) ;

Answer: 18

Question: what percentage of derivative receivables was junk rated in 2012?

Answer: 19%

Answer: 19%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of derivative receivables was junk rated in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 19%.

Rejected response: 18.

Question: what percentage of derivative receivables was junk rated in 2012?

Answer: 19%

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 9636 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral is 16 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of exposure net of all collateral is 10545 ; the bb+/ba1 to b-/b3 of % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral is 15 ;

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is 1283 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral is 2 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of exposure net of all collateral is 2488 ; the ccc+/caa1 and below of % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral is 4 ;

rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios ) the total of rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral is $ 61325 ; the total of rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral is 100% ( 100 % ) ; the total of exposure net of all collateral is $ 70670 ; the total of % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral is 100% ( 100 % ) ;

Answer: 19%

Question: what percentage of derivative receivables was junk rated in 2012?

Answer: 18

Answer: 18


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the average volatility used to value employee stock purchase rights in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 27.5%.

Rejected response: 44.5%.

ADBE || what is the average volatility used to value employee stock purchase rights <TIME>?

Question: what is the average volatility used to value employee stock purchase rights in 2018?

Answer: 27.5%

the assumptions used to value employee stock purchase rights were as follows: .

the expected term of espp shares is the average of the remaining purchase periods under each offering period .

Answer: 27.5%

Question: what is the average volatility used to value employee stock purchase rights in 2017?

Answer: 44.5%

notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) stock options the 2003 plan allows us to grant options to all employees , including executive officers , outside consultants and non- employee directors .

Answer: 44.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the average volatility used to value employee stock purchase rights in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 44.5%.

Rejected response: 27.5%.

Question: what is the average volatility used to value employee stock purchase rights in 2017?

Answer: 44.5%

notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) stock options the 2003 plan allows us to grant options to all employees , including executive officers , outside consultants and non- employee directors .

the assumptions used to value employee stock purchase rights were as follows: .

Answer: 44.5%

Question: what is the average volatility used to value employee stock purchase rights in 2018?

Answer: 27.5%

Answer: 27.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was total rent charged to operating expense in millions for 2013 , 2012 and 2011?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1173.

Rejected response: 802.

GS || what was total rent charged to operating expense in millions <TIME> , <TIME> and <TIME>?

Question: what was total rent charged to operating expense in millions for 2013 , 2012 and 2011?

Answer: 1173

the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets .

rent charged to operating expense was $ 324 million for 2013 , $ 374 million for 2012 and $ 475 million for 2011 .

in millions The total of as of december 2013 is $ 2695 ;

Answer: 1173

Question: what was total rent charged to operating expense in millions for 2016 , 2015 and 2014?

Answer: 802

the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million .

rent charged to operating expense was $ 244 million for 2016 , $ 249 million for 2015 and $ 309 million for 2014 .

$ in millions The total of as of december 2016 is $ 1941 ;

Answer: 802


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was total rent charged to operating expense in millions for 2016 , 2015 and 2014?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 802.

Rejected response: 1173.

Question: what was total rent charged to operating expense in millions for 2016 , 2015 and 2014?

Answer: 802

the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million .

the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets .

rent charged to operating expense was $ 244 million for 2016 , $ 249 million for 2015 and $ 309 million for 2014 .

Answer: 802

Question: what was total rent charged to operating expense in millions for 2013 , 2012 and 2011?

Answer: 1173

rent charged to operating expense was $ 324 million for 2013 , $ 374 million for 2012 and $ 475 million for 2011 .

Answer: 1173


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-09-18 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.53%.

Rejected response: 359.67%.

DISCA || what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca common stock <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2008?

Answer: 2.53%

subtract(102.53, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the disca of september 18 2008 is $ 100.00 ; the disca of september 30 2008 is $ 103.19 ; the disca of december 31 2008 is $ 102.53 ;

september 18 , september 30 , december 31 , 2008 2008 2008 .

2 0 0 8 a n n u a l r e p o r t stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the performance of our series a common , series b common stock , and series c common stock for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 as compared with the performance of the standard and poor 2019s 500 index and a peer group index which consists of the walt disney company , time warner inc. , cbs corporation class b common stock , viacom , inc .

the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2006 and that all subsequent dividends were reinvested in additional shares .

the discb of september 18 2008 is $ 100.00 ; the discb of september 30 2008 is $ 105.54 ; the discb of december 31 2008 is $ 78.53 ;

Answer: 2.53%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2012?

Answer: 359.67%

subtract(459.67, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the disca of december 312008 is $ 102.53 ; the disca of december 312009 is $ 222.09 ; the disca of december 312010 is $ 301.96 ; the disca of december 312011 is $ 296.67 ; the disca of december 312012 is $ 459.67 ;

the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 .

stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc .

the discb of december 312008 is $ 78.53 ; the discb of december 312009 is $ 162.82 ; the discb of december 312010 is $ 225.95 ; the discb of december 312011 is $ 217.56 ; the discb of december 312012 is $ 327.11 ;

Answer: 359.67%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2012?
Reference time interval: 2008-09-18 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 359.67%.

Rejected response: 2.53%.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2012?

Answer: 359.67%

subtract(459.67, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 .

the disca of december 312008 is $ 102.53 ; the disca of december 312009 is $ 222.09 ; the disca of december 312010 is $ 301.96 ; the disca of december 312011 is $ 296.67 ; the disca of december 312012 is $ 459.67 ;

the discb of december 312008 is $ 78.53 ; the discb of december 312009 is $ 162.82 ; the discb of december 312010 is $ 225.95 ; the discb of december 312011 is $ 217.56 ; the discb of december 312012 is $ 327.11 ;

Answer: 359.67%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2008?

Answer: 2.53%

subtract(102.53, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2006 and that all subsequent dividends were reinvested in additional shares .

the disca of september 18 2008 is $ 100.00 ; the disca of september 30 2008 is $ 103.19 ; the disca of december 31 2008 is $ 102.53 ;

the discb of september 18 2008 is $ 100.00 ; the discb of september 30 2008 is $ 105.54 ; the discb of december 31 2008 is $ 78.53 ;

Answer: 2.53%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference in the required additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade in millions in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1743.

Rejected response: 2078.

GS || what is the difference in the required additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade in millions <TIME>?

Question: what is the difference in the required additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade in millions in 2014?

Answer: 1743

$ in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2014 is $ 1072 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is $ 911 ;

$ in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2014 is 2815 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 2989 ;

$ in millions 2014 2013 additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade $ 1072 $ 911 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2815 2989 cash flows as a global financial institution , our cash flows are complex and bear little relation to our net earnings and net assets .

the table below presents the additional collateral or termination payments related to our net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in our credit ratings. .

Answer: 1743

Question: what is the difference in the required additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade in millions in 2013?

Answer: 2078

Answer: 2078


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference in the required additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade in millions in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2078.

Rejected response: 1743.

Question: what is the difference in the required additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade in millions in 2013?

Answer: 2078

the table below presents the additional collateral or termination payments related to our net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in our credit ratings. .

$ in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2014 is $ 1072 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is $ 911 ;

$ in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2014 is 2815 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 2989 ;

Answer: 2078

Question: what is the difference in the required additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade in millions in 2014?

Answer: 1743

Answer: 1743


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what are total estimated future benefit payments in millions for 2019?
Reference time interval: 2019-01-01 00:00:00 to 2020-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1364.

Rejected response: 1382.

C || what are total estimated future benefit payments in millions <TIME>?

Question: what are total estimated future benefit payments in millions for 2019?

Answer: 1364

in millions of dollars the 2019 of pension plans u.s . plans is $ 797 ; the 2019 of pension plans non-u.s . plans is $ 435 ; the 2019 of pension plans u.s . plans is $ 62 ; the 2019 of non-u.s . plans is $ 70 ;

estimated future benefit payments the company expects to pay the following estimated benefit payments in future years: .

the investment strategies are targeted to produce a total return that , when combined with the company 2019s contributions to the funds , will maintain the funds 2019 ability to meet all required benefit obligations .

in millions of dollars the 2020 of pension plans u.s . plans is 828 ; the 2020 of pension plans non-u.s . plans is 417 ; the 2020 of pension plans u.s . plans is 62 ; the 2020 of non-u.s . plans is 75 ;

in millions of dollars the 2024 20132028 of pension plans u.s . plans is 4365 ; the 2024 20132028 of pension plans non-u.s . plans is 2557 ; the 2024 20132028 of pension plans u.s . plans is 252 ; the 2024 20132028 of non-u.s . plans is 547 ;

Answer: 1364

Question: what are total estimated future benefit payments in millions for 2020?

Answer: 1382

Answer: 1382


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what are total estimated future benefit payments in millions for 2020?
Reference time interval: 2020-01-01 00:00:00 to 2021-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1382.

Rejected response: 1364.

Question: what are total estimated future benefit payments in millions for 2020?

Answer: 1382

in millions of dollars the 2019 of pension plans u.s . plans is $ 797 ; the 2019 of pension plans non-u.s . plans is $ 435 ; the 2019 of pension plans u.s . plans is $ 62 ; the 2019 of non-u.s . plans is $ 70 ;

in millions of dollars the 2020 of pension plans u.s . plans is 828 ; the 2020 of pension plans non-u.s . plans is 417 ; the 2020 of pension plans u.s . plans is 62 ; the 2020 of non-u.s . plans is 75 ;

in millions of dollars the 2024 20132028 of pension plans u.s . plans is 4365 ; the 2024 20132028 of pension plans non-u.s . plans is 2557 ; the 2024 20132028 of pension plans u.s . plans is 252 ; the 2024 20132028 of non-u.s . plans is 547 ;

Answer: 1382

Question: what are total estimated future benefit payments in millions for 2019?

Answer: 1364

Answer: 1364


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance from 2003 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4%.

Rejected response: 8%.

PKG || what was the percentage change in total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 4%

total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 35.8 million , $ 33.0 million and $ 31.6 million , respectively .

the minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) stockholder received proceeds , net of the underwriting discount , of $ 20.69 per share .

Answer: 4%

Question: what was the percentage change in total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 8%

Answer: 8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance from 2004 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 8%.

Rejected response: 4%.

Question: what was the percentage change in total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 8%

shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) stockholder received proceeds , net of the underwriting discount , of $ 20.69 per share .

total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 35.8 million , $ 33.0 million and $ 31.6 million , respectively .

Answer: 8%

Question: what was the percentage change in total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 4%

Answer: 4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the deposits of clients from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7.1%.

Rejected response: 8.8%.

STT || what is the growth rate in the deposits of clients <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in the deposits of clients from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 7.1%

as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies .

( in millions ) the client deposits ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2014 is $ 195276 ; the client deposits ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2013 is $ 182268 ; the client deposits ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2014 is $ 167470 ; the client deposits ( 1 ) of 2013 is $ 143043 ;

these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .

client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively .

Answer: 7.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in the deposits of clients from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 8.8%

we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits .

Answer: 8.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the deposits of clients from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 8.8%.

Rejected response: 7.1%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the deposits of clients from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 8.8%

as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies .

( in millions ) the client deposits ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2014 is $ 195276 ; the client deposits ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2013 is $ 182268 ; the client deposits ( 1 ) of december 31 , 2014 is $ 167470 ; the client deposits ( 1 ) of 2013 is $ 143043 ;

client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively .

Answer: 8.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in the deposits of clients from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 7.1%

Answer: 7.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2018 what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2016 is due to maturities of long-term debt?
Reference time interval: 2016-12-31 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 49%.

Rejected response: 7%.

IP || <TIME> what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations <TIME> is due to maturities of long-term debt?

Question: in 2018 what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2016 is due to maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 49%

in millions the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2017 is $ 239 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2018 is $ 690 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2019 is $ 433 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2020 is $ 179 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2021 is $ 612 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of thereafter is $ 9161 ;

in millions the total ( c ) of 2017 is $ 3523 ; the total ( c ) of 2018 is $ 1416 ; the total ( c ) of 2019 is $ 1027 ; the total ( c ) of 2020 is $ 725 ; the total ( c ) of 2021 is $ 1110 ; the total ( c ) of thereafter is $ 11618 ;

contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2016 , were as follows: .

in millions the lease obligations of 2017 is 119 ; the lease obligations of 2018 is 91 ; the lease obligations of 2019 is 69 ; the lease obligations of 2020 is 51 ; the lease obligations of 2021 is 38 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is 125 ;

Answer: 49%

Question: in 2017 what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2016 is due to maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 7%

Answer: 7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2017 what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2016 is due to maturities of long-term debt?
Reference time interval: 2016-12-31 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7%.

Rejected response: 49%.

Question: in 2017 what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2016 is due to maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 7%

in millions the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2017 is $ 239 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2018 is $ 690 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2019 is $ 433 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2020 is $ 179 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2021 is $ 612 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of thereafter is $ 9161 ;

in millions the lease obligations of 2017 is 119 ; the lease obligations of 2018 is 91 ; the lease obligations of 2019 is 69 ; the lease obligations of 2020 is 51 ; the lease obligations of 2021 is 38 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is 125 ;

in millions the total ( c ) of 2017 is $ 3523 ; the total ( c ) of 2018 is $ 1416 ; the total ( c ) of 2019 is $ 1027 ; the total ( c ) of 2020 is $ 725 ; the total ( c ) of 2021 is $ 1110 ; the total ( c ) of thereafter is $ 11618 ;

Answer: 7%

Question: in 2018 what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2016 is due to maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 49%

Answer: 49%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: if the companies accounting policy were to include accrued interest and penalties in utp , what would the balance be as of at june 30 2009?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6259.

Rejected response: 8077.

JKHY || if the companies accounting policy were to include accrued interest and penalties in utp , what would the balance be as of at june 30 <TIME>?

Question: if the companies accounting policy were to include accrued interest and penalties in utp , what would the balance be as of at june 30 2009?

Answer: 6259

the balance at june 30 2009 of unrecognized tax benefits is 5518 ;

we had accrued interest and penalties of $ 890 and $ 732 related to uncertain tax positions at june 30 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .

The balance at june 30 2010 of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 7187 ;

the balance at june 30 2010 of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 7187 ;

Answer: 6259

Question: if the companies accounting policy were to include accrued interest and penalties in utp , what would the balance be as of at june 30 2010?

Answer: 8077

The balance at june 30 2009 of unrecognized tax benefits is 5518 ;

Answer: 8077


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: if the companies accounting policy were to include accrued interest and penalties in utp , what would the balance be as of at june 30 2010?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 8077.

Rejected response: 6259.

Question: if the companies accounting policy were to include accrued interest and penalties in utp , what would the balance be as of at june 30 2010?

Answer: 8077

we had accrued interest and penalties of $ 890 and $ 732 related to uncertain tax positions at june 30 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .

the balance at june 30 2009 of unrecognized tax benefits is 5518 ;

the balance at june 30 2010 of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 7187 ;

Answer: 8077

Question: if the companies accounting policy were to include accrued interest and penalties in utp , what would the balance be as of at june 30 2009?

Answer: 6259

Answer: 6259


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in projected payments from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -17.5%.

Rejected response: 20.9%.

FIS || what is the growth rate in projected payments <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in projected payments from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: -17.5%

projected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Answer: -17.5%

Question: what is the growth rate in projected payments from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: 20.9%

Answer: 20.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in projected payments from 2008 to 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 20.9%.

Rejected response: -17.5%.

Question: what is the growth rate in projected payments from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: 20.9%

projected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Answer: 20.9%

Question: what is the growth rate in projected payments from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: -17.5%

Answer: -17.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the income before tax in 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4448.6.

Rejected response: 4574.3.

L || what is the income before tax <TIME>?

Question: what is the income before tax in 2006?

Answer: 4448.6

total income tax expense for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , was different than the amounts of $ 1601 million , $ 1557 million and $ 639 million , computed by applying the statutory u.s .

federal income tax rate of 35% ( 35 % ) to income before income taxes and minority interest for each of the years. .

income taxes 2013 ( continued ) the federal income tax return for 2006 is subject to examination by the irs .

balance january 1 2007 the balance december 31 2007 of $ 70 is $ 53 ;

Answer: 4448.6

Question: what is the income before tax in 2007?

Answer: 4574.3

the company recognizes penalties in income tax expense ( benefit ) on the consolidated statements of income .

Answer: 4574.3


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the income before tax in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4574.3.

Rejected response: 4448.6.

Question: what is the income before tax in 2007?

Answer: 4574.3

balance january 1 2007 the balance december 31 2007 of $ 70 is $ 53 ;

total income tax expense for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , was different than the amounts of $ 1601 million , $ 1557 million and $ 639 million , computed by applying the statutory u.s .

federal income tax rate of 35% ( 35 % ) to income before income taxes and minority interest for each of the years. .

Answer: 4574.3

Question: what is the income before tax in 2006?

Answer: 4448.6

Answer: 4448.6


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total number of sites acquired and constructed during 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 14970.

Rejected response: 8450.

AMT || what is the total number of sites acquired and constructed <TIME>?

Question: what is the total number of sites acquired and constructed during 2015?

Answer: 14970

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the u.s . of 2015 is 11595 ; the u.s . of 2014 is 900 ; the u.s . of 2013 is 5260 ;

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the asia of 2015 is 2330 ; the asia of 2014 is 1560 ; the asia of 2013 is 1260 ;

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the emea of 2015 is 4910 ; the emea of 2014 is 190 ; the emea of 2013 is 485 ;

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the latin america of 2015 is 6535 ; the latin america of 2014 is 5800 ; the latin america of 2013 is 6065 ;

Answer: 14970

Question: what is the total number of sites acquired and constructed during 2014?

Answer: 8450

Answer: 8450


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total number of sites acquired and constructed during 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 8450.

Rejected response: 14970.

Question: what is the total number of sites acquired and constructed during 2014?

Answer: 8450

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the u.s . of 2015 is 11595 ; the u.s . of 2014 is 900 ; the u.s . of 2013 is 5260 ;

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the asia of 2015 is 2330 ; the asia of 2014 is 1560 ; the asia of 2013 is 1260 ;

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the emea of 2015 is 4910 ; the emea of 2014 is 190 ; the emea of 2013 is 485 ;

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the latin america of 2015 is 6535 ; the latin america of 2014 is 5800 ; the latin america of 2013 is 6065 ;

Answer: 8450

Question: what is the total number of sites acquired and constructed during 2015?

Answer: 14970

Answer: 14970


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was from the printing papers segment in 2004?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 50%.

Rejected response: 57%.

IP || what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was from the printing papers segment <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was from the printing papers segment in 2004?

Answer: 50%

in millions the printing papers of 2005 is $ 658 ; the printing papers of 2004 is $ 590 ; the printing papers of 2003 is $ 482 ;

in millions the total from continuing operations of 2005 is $ 1155 ; the total from continuing operations of 2004 is $ 1176 ; the total from continuing operations of 2003 is $ 993 ;

the following table presents capital spending from continuing operations by each of our business segments for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 .

investment activities capital spending from continuing operations was $ 1.2 billion in 2005 , or 84% ( 84 % ) of depreciation and amor- tization , comparable to the $ 1.2 billion , or 87% ( 87 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2004 , and $ 1.0 billion , or 74% ( 74 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2003 .

Answer: 50%

Question: what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was from the printing papers segment in 2005?

Answer: 57%

Answer: 57%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was from the printing papers segment in 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 57%.

Rejected response: 50%.

Question: what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was from the printing papers segment in 2005?

Answer: 57%

investment activities capital spending from continuing operations was $ 1.2 billion in 2005 , or 84% ( 84 % ) of depreciation and amor- tization , comparable to the $ 1.2 billion , or 87% ( 87 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2004 , and $ 1.0 billion , or 74% ( 74 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2003 .

in millions the printing papers of 2005 is $ 658 ; the printing papers of 2004 is $ 590 ; the printing papers of 2003 is $ 482 ;

in millions the total from continuing operations of 2005 is $ 1155 ; the total from continuing operations of 2004 is $ 1176 ; the total from continuing operations of 2003 is $ 993 ;

Answer: 57%

Question: what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was from the printing papers segment in 2004?

Answer: 50%

Answer: 50%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are due in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 16%.

Rejected response: 23%.

PKG || what percentage of total minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are due <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are due in 2012?

Answer: 16%

the total of ( in thousands ) is $ 108052 ;

the minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are as follows: .

Answer: 16%

Question: what percentage of total minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are due in 2011?

Answer: 23%

the 2010 of ( in thousands ) is $ 28162 ;

Answer: 23%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are due in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 23%.

Rejected response: 16%.

Question: what percentage of total minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are due in 2011?

Answer: 23%

the 2010 of ( in thousands ) is $ 28162 ;

the total of ( in thousands ) is $ 108052 ;

Answer: 23%

Question: what percentage of total minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are due in 2012?

Answer: 16%

Answer: 16%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of net derivative receivables were collateralized by other than cash in 2013?\\n
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 22.0%.

Rejected response: 24.8%.

JPM || what percent of net derivative receivables were collateralized by other than cash <TIME>?\\n

Question: what percent of net derivative receivables were collateralized by other than cash in 2013?\\n

Answer: 22.0%

december 31 ( in millions ) the total net of cash collateral of 2014 is 78975 ; the total net of cash collateral of 2013 is 65759 ;

december 31 ( in millions ) the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables of 2014 is -19604 ( 19604 ) ; the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables of 2013 is -14435 ( 14435 ) ;

december 31 ( in millions ) the total net of all collateral of 2014 is $ 59371 ; the total net of all collateral of 2013 is $ 51324 ;

Answer: 22.0%

Question: what percent of net derivative receivables were collateralized by other than cash in 2014?\\n

Answer: 24.8%

Answer: 24.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of net derivative receivables were collateralized by other than cash in 2014?\\n
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 24.8%.

Rejected response: 22.0%.

Question: what percent of net derivative receivables were collateralized by other than cash in 2014?\\n

Answer: 24.8%

december 31 ( in millions ) the total net of cash collateral of 2014 is 78975 ; the total net of cash collateral of 2013 is 65759 ;

december 31 ( in millions ) the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables of 2014 is -19604 ( 19604 ) ; the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables of 2013 is -14435 ( 14435 ) ;

december 31 ( in millions ) the total net of all collateral of 2014 is $ 59371 ; the total net of all collateral of 2013 is $ 51324 ;

Answer: 24.8%

Question: what percent of net derivative receivables were collateralized by other than cash in 2013?\\n

Answer: 22.0%

Answer: 22.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage where brazilian papers net sales of printing papers sales in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 19%.

IP || what percentage where brazilian papers net sales of printing papers sales <TIME>?

Question: what percentage where brazilian papers net sales of printing papers sales in 2013?

Answer: 18%

in millions the sales of 2014 is $ 5720 ; the sales of 2013 is $ 6205 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 6230 ;

brazilian papers net sales for 2014 were $ 1.1 billion compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2013 and $ 1.1 billion in 2012 .

north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.1 billion in 2014 , $ 2.6 billion in 2013 and $ 2.7 billion in 2012 .

Answer: 18%

Question: what percentage where brazilian papers net sales of printing papers sales in 2014?

Answer: 19%

Answer: 19%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage where brazilian papers net sales of printing papers sales in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 19%.

Rejected response: 18%.

Question: what percentage where brazilian papers net sales of printing papers sales in 2014?

Answer: 19%

in millions the sales of 2014 is $ 5720 ; the sales of 2013 is $ 6205 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 6230 ;

north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.1 billion in 2014 , $ 2.6 billion in 2013 and $ 2.7 billion in 2012 .

brazilian papers net sales for 2014 were $ 1.1 billion compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2013 and $ 1.1 billion in 2012 .

Answer: 19%

Question: what percentage where brazilian papers net sales of printing papers sales in 2013?

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended 2010?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -60.38%.

Rejected response: 3.74%.

MAS || what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended <TIME>?

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended 2010?

Answer: -60.38%

the masco of 2006 is $ 101.79 ; the masco of 2007 is $ 76.74 ; the masco of 2008 is $ 42.81 ; the masco of 2009 is $ 54.89 ; the masco of 2010 is $ 51.51 ;

the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .

Answer: -60.38%

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended 2013?

Answer: 3.74%

the masco of 2009 is $ 128.21 ; the masco of 2010 is $ 120.32 ; the masco of 2011 is $ 102.45 ; the masco of 2012 is $ 165.80 ; the masco of 2013 is $ 229.59 ;

the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .

Answer: 3.74%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.74%.

Rejected response: -60.38%.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended 2013?

Answer: 3.74%

the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .

the masco of 2009 is $ 128.21 ; the masco of 2010 is $ 120.32 ; the masco of 2011 is $ 102.45 ; the masco of 2012 is $ 165.80 ; the masco of 2013 is $ 229.59 ;

Answer: 3.74%

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended 2010?

Answer: -60.38%

the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .

the masco of 2006 is $ 101.79 ; the masco of 2007 is $ 76.74 ; the masco of 2008 is $ 42.81 ; the masco of 2009 is $ 54.89 ; the masco of 2010 is $ 51.51 ;

Answer: -60.38%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage sales change from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 24%.

Rejected response: 39%.

AAPL || what was the percentage sales change <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage sales change from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 24%

the net sales of september 29 2007 is $ 24006 ; the net sales of september 30 2006 is $ 19315 ; the net sales of september 24 2005 is $ 13931 ;

The gross margin percentage of september 29 2007 is 34.0% ( 34.0 % ) ; The gross margin percentage of september 30 2006 is 29.0% ( 29.0 % ) ; The gross margin percentage of september 24 2005 is 29.0% ( 29.0 % ) ;

gross margin percentage of 34.0% ( 34.0 % ) in 2007 increased significantly from 29.0% ( 29.0 % ) in 2006 .

the cost of sales of september 29 2007 is 15852 ; the cost of sales of september 30 2006 is 13717 ; the cost of sales of september 24 2005 is 9889 ;

the gross margin of september 29 2007 is $ 8154 ; the gross margin of september 30 2006 is $ 5598 ; the gross margin of september 24 2005 is $ 4042 ;

Answer: 24%

Question: what was the percentage sales change from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 39%

during 2006 , net sales in other segments increased 35% ( 35 % ) compared to 2005 primarily due to an increase in sales of ipod and mac portable products .

gross margin gross margin for each of the last three fiscal years are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 .

Answer: 39%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage sales change from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 39%.

Rejected response: 24%.

Question: what was the percentage sales change from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 39%

gross margin gross margin for each of the last three fiscal years are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 .

the net sales of september 29 2007 is $ 24006 ; the net sales of september 30 2006 is $ 19315 ; the net sales of september 24 2005 is $ 13931 ;

the gross margin of september 29 2007 is $ 8154 ; the gross margin of september 30 2006 is $ 5598 ; the gross margin of september 24 2005 is $ 4042 ;

Answer: 39%

Question: what was the percentage sales change from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 24%

the cost of sales of september 29 2007 is 15852 ; the cost of sales of september 30 2006 is 13717 ; the cost of sales of september 24 2005 is 9889 ;

Answer: 24%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total number of new sites acquired and constructed during 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 45310.

Rejected response: 6535.

AMT || what is the total number of new sites acquired and constructed <TIME>?

Question: what is the total number of new sites acquired and constructed during 2016?

Answer: 45310

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the u.s . of 2016 is 65 ; the u.s . of 2015 is 11595 ; the u.s . of 2014 is 900 ;

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the asia of 2016 is 43865 ; the asia of 2015 is 2330 ; the asia of 2014 is 1560 ;

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the emea of 2016 is 665 ; the emea of 2015 is 4910 ; the emea of 2014 is 190 ;

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the latin america of 2016 is 715 ; the latin america of 2015 is 6535 ; the latin america of 2014 is 5800 ;

Answer: 45310

Question: what is the total number of new sites acquired and constructed during 2015?

Answer: 6535

Answer: 6535


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total number of new sites acquired and constructed during 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6535.

Rejected response: 45310.

Question: what is the total number of new sites acquired and constructed during 2015?

Answer: 6535

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the u.s . of 2016 is 65 ; the u.s . of 2015 is 11595 ; the u.s . of 2014 is 900 ;

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the asia of 2016 is 43865 ; the asia of 2015 is 2330 ; the asia of 2014 is 1560 ;

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the emea of 2016 is 665 ; the emea of 2015 is 4910 ; the emea of 2014 is 190 ;

new sites ( acquired or constructed ) the latin america of 2016 is 715 ; the latin america of 2015 is 6535 ; the latin america of 2014 is 5800 ;

Answer: 6535

Question: what is the total number of new sites acquired and constructed during 2016?

Answer: 45310

Answer: 45310


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the accumulated other comprehensive income during 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1836.

Rejected response: 756.

INTC || what is the net change in the accumulated other comprehensive income <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the accumulated other comprehensive income during 2018?

Answer: -1836

( in millions ) the december 30 2017 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale equity investments is 1745 ; the december 30 2017 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is 106 ; the december 30 2017 of actuarial valuation and other pension expenses is -963 ( 963 ) ; the december 30 2017 of translation adjustments and other is -26 ( 26 ) ; the december 30 2017 of total is 862 ;

( in millions ) the december 29 2018 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale equity investments is $ 2014 ; the december 29 2018 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is $ -123 ( 123 ) ; the december 29 2018 of actuarial valuation and other pension expenses is $ -818 ( 818 ) ; the december 29 2018 of translation adjustments and other is $ -33 ( 33 ) ; the december 29 2018 of total is $ -974 ( 974 ) ;

( in millions ) The amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale equity investments is 2014 ; The amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is 9 ; The amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) of actuarial valuation and other pension expenses is 109 ; The amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) of translation adjustments and other is 8 ; The amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) of total is 126 ;

( in millions ) the december 31 2016 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale equity investments is $ 2179 ; the december 31 2016 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is $ -259 ( 259 ) ; the december 31 2016 of actuarial valuation and other pension expenses is $ -1280 ( 1280 ) ; the december 31 2016 of translation adjustments and other is $ -534 ( 534 ) ; the december 31 2016 of total is $ 106 ;

Answer: -1836

Question: what is the net change in the accumulated other comprehensive income during 2017?

Answer: 756

( in millions ) the opening balance as of december 31 2017 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale equity investments is 2014 ; the opening balance as of december 31 2017 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is 130 ; the opening balance as of december 31 2017 of actuarial valuation and other pension expenses is -1028 ( 1028 ) ; the opening balance as of december 31 2017 of translation adjustments and other is -30 ( 30 ) ; the opening balance as of december 31 2017 of total is -928 ( 928 ) ;

Answer: 756


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the accumulated other comprehensive income during 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 756.

Rejected response: -1836.

Question: what is the net change in the accumulated other comprehensive income during 2017?

Answer: 756

( in millions ) the december 31 2016 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale equity investments is $ 2179 ; the december 31 2016 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is $ -259 ( 259 ) ; the december 31 2016 of actuarial valuation and other pension expenses is $ -1280 ( 1280 ) ; the december 31 2016 of translation adjustments and other is $ -534 ( 534 ) ; the december 31 2016 of total is $ 106 ;

( in millions ) the december 30 2017 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale equity investments is 1745 ; the december 30 2017 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is 106 ; the december 30 2017 of actuarial valuation and other pension expenses is -963 ( 963 ) ; the december 30 2017 of translation adjustments and other is -26 ( 26 ) ; the december 30 2017 of total is 862 ;

( in millions ) the opening balance as of december 31 2017 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale equity investments is 2014 ; the opening balance as of december 31 2017 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is 130 ; the opening balance as of december 31 2017 of actuarial valuation and other pension expenses is -1028 ( 1028 ) ; the opening balance as of december 31 2017 of translation adjustments and other is -30 ( 30 ) ; the opening balance as of december 31 2017 of total is -928 ( 928 ) ;

Answer: 756

Question: what is the net change in the accumulated other comprehensive income during 2018?

Answer: -1836

( in millions ) the december 29 2018 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale equity investments is $ 2014 ; the december 29 2018 of unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives is $ -123 ( 123 ) ; the december 29 2018 of actuarial valuation and other pension expenses is $ -818 ( 818 ) ; the december 29 2018 of translation adjustments and other is $ -33 ( 33 ) ; the december 29 2018 of total is $ -974 ( 974 ) ;

Answer: -1836


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent change in weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share between 2008 and 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5%.

Rejected response: -9%.

ZBH || what is the percent change in weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share <TIME>?

Question: what is the percent change in weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: -5%

Explanation: i know these questions are very similar but there is not much else that can be gathered from the sample that has not already been stated

the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2009 is 215.0 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2008 is 227.3 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2007 is 235.5 ;

The weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2009 is 215.8 ; The weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2008 is 228.3 ; The weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2007 is 237.5 ;

the denominator for basic earnings per share is the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period .

the following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares for the basic and diluted share computations for the years ending december 31 ( in millions ) : .

the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2009 is 215.8 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2008 is 228.3 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2007 is 237.5 ;

Answer: -5%

Question: what is the percent change in weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share between 2007 and 2009?

Answer: -9%

Answer: -9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent change in weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share between 2007 and 2009?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -9%.

Rejected response: -5%.

Question: what is the percent change in weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share between 2007 and 2009?

Answer: -9%

the following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares for the basic and diluted share computations for the years ending december 31 ( in millions ) : .

the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2009 is 215.0 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2008 is 227.3 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share of 2007 is 235.5 ;

the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2009 is 215.8 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2008 is 228.3 ; the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share of 2007 is 237.5 ;

Answer: -9%

Question: what is the percent change in weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: -5%

Explanation: i know these questions are very similar but there is not much else that can be gathered from the sample that has not already been stated

Answer: -5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in year end allowance for uncollectible accounts between 2004 and 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -26%.

Rejected response: 55%.

CNC || what was the percentage change in year end allowance for uncollectible accounts <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in year end allowance for uncollectible accounts between 2004 and 2005?

Answer: -26%

the allowances end of year of 2006 is $ 155 ; the allowances end of year of 2005 is $ 343 ; the allowances end of year of 2004 is $ 462 ;

activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31 is summarized below: .

The allowances beginning of year of 2006 is $ 343 ; The allowances beginning of year of 2005 is $ 462 ; The allowances beginning of year of 2004 is $ 607 ;

the allowances beginning of year of 2006 is $ 343 ; the allowances beginning of year of 2005 is $ 462 ; the allowances beginning of year of 2004 is $ 607 ;

Answer: -26%

Question: what was the percentage change in year end allowance for uncollectible accounts between 2005 and 2006?

Answer: 55%

Answer: 55%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in year end allowance for uncollectible accounts between 2005 and 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 55%.

Rejected response: -26%.

Question: what was the percentage change in year end allowance for uncollectible accounts between 2005 and 2006?

Answer: 55%

activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31 is summarized below: .

the allowances beginning of year of 2006 is $ 343 ; the allowances beginning of year of 2005 is $ 462 ; the allowances beginning of year of 2004 is $ 607 ;

the allowances end of year of 2006 is $ 155 ; the allowances end of year of 2005 is $ 343 ; the allowances end of year of 2004 is $ 462 ;

Answer: 55%

Question: what was the percentage change in year end allowance for uncollectible accounts between 2004 and 2005?

Answer: -26%

Answer: -26%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total compensation expense in 2017 is composed of other variable incentive compensation?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 31%.

Rejected response: 32%.

C || what percentage of total compensation expense <TIME> is composed of other variable incentive compensation?

Question: what percentage of total compensation expense in 2017 is composed of other variable incentive compensation?

Answer: 31%

in millions of dollars the other variable incentive compensation of 2018 is 640 ; the other variable incentive compensation of 2017 is 694 ; the other variable incentive compensation of 2016 is 710 ;

in millions of dollars the total of 2018 is $ 2021 ; the total of 2017 is $ 2251 ; the total of 2016 is $ 2183 ;

the expense is generally accrued as cash incentive compensation in the year prior to grant .

( 2 ) all periods include amortization expense for all unvested awards to non-retirement-eligible employees. .

Answer: 31%

Question: what percentage of total compensation expense in 2018 is composed of other variable incentive compensation?

Answer: 32%

Answer: 32%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total compensation expense in 2018 is composed of other variable incentive compensation?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 32%.

Rejected response: 31%.

Question: what percentage of total compensation expense in 2018 is composed of other variable incentive compensation?

Answer: 32%

in millions of dollars the other variable incentive compensation of 2018 is 640 ; the other variable incentive compensation of 2017 is 694 ; the other variable incentive compensation of 2016 is 710 ;

in millions of dollars the total of 2018 is $ 2021 ; the total of 2017 is $ 2251 ; the total of 2016 is $ 2183 ;

( 2 ) all periods include amortization expense for all unvested awards to non-retirement-eligible employees. .

Answer: 32%

Question: what percentage of total compensation expense in 2017 is composed of other variable incentive compensation?

Answer: 31%

Answer: 31%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total debt was long-term debt in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 61%.

Rejected response: 81%.

EMR || what percentage of total debt was long-term debt <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total debt was long-term debt in 2016?

Answer: 61%

( dollars in millions ) the long-term debt of 2015 is $ 4289 ; the long-term debt of 2016 is 4051 ; the long-term debt of 2017 is 3794 ;

total debt , which includes long-term debt , current maturities of long-term debt , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings , was $ 4.7 billion , $ 6.6 billion and $ 6.8 billion for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

( dollars in millions ) The total debt-to-total capital ratio of 2015 is 45.8% ( 45.8 % ) ; The total debt-to-total capital ratio of 2016 is 46.7% ( 46.7 % ) ; The total debt-to-total capital ratio of 2017 is 34.8% ( 34.8 % ) ;

( dollars in millions ) the total assets of 2015 is $ 22088 ; the total assets of 2016 is 21732 ; the total assets of 2017 is 19589 ;

Answer: 61%

Question: what percentage of total debt was long-term debt in 2017?

Answer: 81%

Answer: 81%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total debt was long-term debt in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 81%.

Rejected response: 61%.

Question: what percentage of total debt was long-term debt in 2017?

Answer: 81%

( dollars in millions ) the total assets of 2015 is $ 22088 ; the total assets of 2016 is 21732 ; the total assets of 2017 is 19589 ;

( dollars in millions ) the long-term debt of 2015 is $ 4289 ; the long-term debt of 2016 is 4051 ; the long-term debt of 2017 is 3794 ;

total debt , which includes long-term debt , current maturities of long-term debt , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings , was $ 4.7 billion , $ 6.6 billion and $ 6.8 billion for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

Answer: 81%

Question: what percentage of total debt was long-term debt in 2016?

Answer: 61%

Answer: 61%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total revenues net of interest expense was non-interest revenue in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 27%.

Rejected response: 29%.

C || what percent of total revenues net of interest expense was non-interest revenue <TIME>?

Question: what percent of total revenues net of interest expense was non-interest revenue in 2008?

Answer: 27%

in millions of dollars the non-interest revenue of 2009 is 5473 ; the non-interest revenue of 2008 is 6550 ; the non-interest revenue of 2007 is 8584 ; the non-interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is -16 ( 16 ) ; the non-interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is -24 ( 24 ) ;

in millions of dollars the total revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ 19182 ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ 24453 ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ 26750 ; the total revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 22 ) % ( % ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is ( 9 ) % ( % ) ;

2007 revenues , net of interest expense decreased 9% ( 9 % ) versus the prior year , mostly due to lower non-interest revenue .

in millions of dollars the net interest revenue of 2009 is $ 13709 ; the net interest revenue of 2008 is $ 17903 ; the net interest revenue of 2007 is $ 18166 ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 23 ) % ( % ) ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is ( 1 ) % ( % ) ;

Answer: 27%

Question: what percent of total revenues net of interest expense was non-interest revenue in 2009?

Answer: 29%

Answer: 29%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total revenues net of interest expense was non-interest revenue in 2009?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 29%.

Rejected response: 27%.

Question: what percent of total revenues net of interest expense was non-interest revenue in 2009?

Answer: 29%

in millions of dollars the net interest revenue of 2009 is $ 13709 ; the net interest revenue of 2008 is $ 17903 ; the net interest revenue of 2007 is $ 18166 ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 23 ) % ( % ) ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is ( 1 ) % ( % ) ;

in millions of dollars the non-interest revenue of 2009 is 5473 ; the non-interest revenue of 2008 is 6550 ; the non-interest revenue of 2007 is 8584 ; the non-interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is -16 ( 16 ) ; the non-interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is -24 ( 24 ) ;

in millions of dollars the total revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ 19182 ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ 24453 ; the total revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ 26750 ; the total revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 22 ) % ( % ) ; the total revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is ( 9 ) % ( % ) ;

Answer: 29%

Question: what percent of total revenues net of interest expense was non-interest revenue in 2008?

Answer: 27%

Answer: 27%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the annual operating cash flow between 2010 and 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 102%.

Rejected response: 36%.

AAPL || what was the percentage change in the annual operating cash flow <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in the annual operating cash flow between 2010 and 2011?

Answer: 102%

the annual operating cash flow of 2012 is $ 50856 ; the annual operating cash flow of 2011 is $ 37529 ; the annual operating cash flow of 2010 is $ 18595 ;

The cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2012 is $ 121251 ; The cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2011 is $ 81570 ; The cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2010 is $ 51011 ;

as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had $ 121.3 billion in cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities , an increase of $ 39.7 billion or 49% ( 49 % ) from september 24 , 2011 .

35% ( 35 % ) due primarily to certain undistributed foreign earnings for which no u.s .

the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2012 is $ 121251 ; the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2011 is $ 81570 ; the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2010 is $ 51011 ;

Answer: 102%

Question: what was the percentage change in the annual operating cash flow between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: 36%

the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments , common stock repurchases , dividends on its common stock , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months .

Answer: 36%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the annual operating cash flow between 2011 and 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 36%.

Rejected response: 102%.

Question: what was the percentage change in the annual operating cash flow between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: 36%

the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2012 is $ 121251 ; the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2011 is $ 81570 ; the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities of 2010 is $ 51011 ;

the annual operating cash flow of 2012 is $ 50856 ; the annual operating cash flow of 2011 is $ 37529 ; the annual operating cash flow of 2010 is $ 18595 ;

the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments , common stock repurchases , dividends on its common stock , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months .

Answer: 36%

Question: what was the percentage change in the annual operating cash flow between 2010 and 2011?

Answer: 102%

35% ( 35 % ) due primarily to certain undistributed foreign earnings for which no u.s .

Answer: 102%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the roi of global payments from 2003 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 37.8%.

Rejected response: 49.0%.

GPN || what is the roi of global payments <TIME>?

Question: what is the roi of global payments from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 37.8%

subtract(137.75, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the may 31 2003 of global payments is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2003 of s&p 500 is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2003 of s&p information technology is $ 100.00 ;

the may 31 2004 of global payments is 137.75 ; the may 31 2004 of s&p 500 is 118.33 ; the may 31 2004 of s&p information technology is 121.98 ;

global payments s&p 500 information technology .

the may 31 2005 of global payments is 205.20 ; the may 31 2005 of s&p 500 is 128.07 ; the may 31 2005 of s&p information technology is 123.08 ;

Answer: 37.8%

Question: what is the roi of global payments from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 49.0%

Answer: 49.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the roi of global payments from 2004 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 49.0%.

Rejected response: 37.8%.

Question: what is the roi of global payments from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 49.0%

the may 31 2003 of global payments is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2003 of s&p 500 is $ 100.00 ; the may 31 2003 of s&p information technology is $ 100.00 ;

the may 31 2004 of global payments is 137.75 ; the may 31 2004 of s&p 500 is 118.33 ; the may 31 2004 of s&p information technology is 121.98 ;

the may 31 2005 of global payments is 205.20 ; the may 31 2005 of s&p 500 is 128.07 ; the may 31 2005 of s&p information technology is 123.08 ;

Answer: 49.0%

Question: what is the roi of global payments from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: 37.8%

subtract(137.75, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

Answer: 37.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the expected change according to the model in the fair value per share between 2012 and 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -4.46.

Rejected response: 4.03.

EW || what is the expected change according to the model in the fair value per share <TIME>?

Question: what is the expected change according to the model in the fair value per share between 2012 and 2013?

Answer: -4.46

the fair value per share of 2014 is $ 23.50 ; the fair value per share of 2013 is $ 19.47 ; the fair value per share of 2012 is $ 23.93 ;

The expected dividend yield of 2014 is none ; The expected dividend yield of 2013 is none ; The expected dividend yield of 2012 is none ;

The expected life ( years ) of 2014 is 4.6 ; The expected life ( years ) of 2013 is 4.6 ; The expected life ( years ) of 2012 is 4.6 ;

the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .

the expected volatility of 2014 is 31% ( 31 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2013 is 31% ( 31 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2012 is 31% ( 31 % ) ;

Answer: -4.46

Question: what is the expected change according to the model in the fair value per share between 2013 and 2014?

Answer: 4.03

Answer: 4.03


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the expected change according to the model in the fair value per share between 2013 and 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.03.

Rejected response: -4.46.

Question: what is the expected change according to the model in the fair value per share between 2013 and 2014?

Answer: 4.03

the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .

the expected volatility of 2014 is 31% ( 31 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2013 is 31% ( 31 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2012 is 31% ( 31 % ) ;

the fair value per share of 2014 is $ 23.50 ; the fair value per share of 2013 is $ 19.47 ; the fair value per share of 2012 is $ 23.93 ;

Answer: 4.03

Question: what is the expected change according to the model in the fair value per share between 2012 and 2013?

Answer: -4.46

Answer: -4.46


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in income from financial investments net in millions from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -49.

Rejected response: 64.

MAS || what was the difference in income from financial investments net in millions <TIME>?

Question: what was the difference in income from financial investments net in millions from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -49

the income from financial investments net ( note e ) of 2012 is 24 ; the income from financial investments net ( note e ) of 2011 is 73 ; the income from financial investments net ( note e ) of 2010 is 9 ;

other income ( expense ) , net other , net , which is included in other income ( expense ) , net , was as follows , in millions: .

The other interest income of 2012 is 1 ; The other interest income of 2011 is 1 ; The other interest income of 2010 is 1 ;

of $ 229 million , $ 241 million and $ 246 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .

the income from cash and cash investments of 2012 is $ 6 ; the income from cash and cash investments of 2011 is $ 8 ; the income from cash and cash investments of 2010 is $ 6 ;

Answer: -49

Question: what was the difference in income from financial investments net in millions from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 64

Answer: 64


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the difference in income from financial investments net in millions from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 64.

Rejected response: -49.

Question: what was the difference in income from financial investments net in millions from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 64

of $ 229 million , $ 241 million and $ 246 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .

the income from cash and cash investments of 2012 is $ 6 ; the income from cash and cash investments of 2011 is $ 8 ; the income from cash and cash investments of 2010 is $ 6 ;

the income from financial investments net ( note e ) of 2012 is 24 ; the income from financial investments net ( note e ) of 2011 is 73 ; the income from financial investments net ( note e ) of 2010 is 9 ;

Answer: 64

Question: what was the difference in income from financial investments net in millions from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -49

Answer: -49


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in restaurants percentage of sales from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2%.

Rejected response: 1%.

SYY || what was the change in restaurants percentage of sales <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in restaurants percentage of sales from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -2%

type of customer the restaurants of 2014 is 62% ( 62 % ) ; the restaurants of 2013 is 61% ( 61 % ) ; the restaurants of 2012 is 63% ( 63 % ) ;

type of customer The other ( 1 ) of 2014 is 12 ; The other ( 1 ) of 2013 is 13 ; The other ( 1 ) of 2012 is 11 ;

type of customer The healthcare of 2014 is 9 ; The healthcare of 2013 is 10 ; The healthcare of 2012 is 10 ;

we estimate that our sales by type of customer during the past three fi scal years were as follows: .

see the discussion in 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , liquidity and capital resources 201d at item 7 regarding our liquidity , fi nancial position and sources and uses of funds .

Answer: -2%

Question: what was the change in restaurants percentage of sales from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 1%

no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of sysco 2019s total sales for the fi scal year ended june 28 , 2014 .

Answer: 1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in restaurants percentage of sales from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1%.

Rejected response: -2%.

Question: what was the change in restaurants percentage of sales from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 1%

we estimate that our sales by type of customer during the past three fi scal years were as follows: .

type of customer the restaurants of 2014 is 62% ( 62 % ) ; the restaurants of 2013 is 61% ( 61 % ) ; the restaurants of 2012 is 63% ( 63 % ) ;

see the discussion in 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , liquidity and capital resources 201d at item 7 regarding our liquidity , fi nancial position and sources and uses of funds .

Answer: 1%

Question: what was the change in restaurants percentage of sales from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -2%

Answer: -2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in advertising costs from 2002 to 2003?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 173000.

Rejected response: 210000.

ILMN || what was the change in advertising costs <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in advertising costs from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: 173000

advertising costs were approximately $ 440000 for 2003 , $ 267000 for 2002 and $ 57000 for 2001 .

notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) advertising costs the company expenses advertising costs as incurred .

deferred income tax expense is generally the net change during the year in the deferred income tax asset or liability .

the fair value for these options was estimated at the dates of grant using the fair value option pricing model ( black scholes ) with the following weighted-average assumptions for 2003 , 2002 and 2001 : year ended year ended year ended december 28 , december 29 , december 30 , 2003 2002 2001 weighted average risk-free interest rate******* 3.03% ( 3.03 % ) 3.73% ( 3.73 % ) 4.65% ( 4.65 % ) expected dividend yield********************* 0% ( 0 % ) 0% ( 0 % ) 0% ( 0 % ) weighted average volatility ****************** 103% ( 103 % ) 104% ( 104 % ) 119% ( 119 % ) estimated life ( in years ) ********************** 5 5 5 .

Answer: 173000

Question: what was the change in advertising costs from 2001 to 2002?

Answer: 210000

Answer: 210000


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in advertising costs from 2001 to 2002?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2003-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 210000.

Rejected response: 173000.

Question: what was the change in advertising costs from 2001 to 2002?

Answer: 210000

notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) advertising costs the company expenses advertising costs as incurred .

advertising costs were approximately $ 440000 for 2003 , $ 267000 for 2002 and $ 57000 for 2001 .

the fair value for these options was estimated at the dates of grant using the fair value option pricing model ( black scholes ) with the following weighted-average assumptions for 2003 , 2002 and 2001 : year ended year ended year ended december 28 , december 29 , december 30 , 2003 2002 2001 weighted average risk-free interest rate******* 3.03% ( 3.03 % ) 3.73% ( 3.73 % ) 4.65% ( 4.65 % ) expected dividend yield********************* 0% ( 0 % ) 0% ( 0 % ) 0% ( 0 % ) weighted average volatility ****************** 103% ( 103 % ) 104% ( 104 % ) 119% ( 119 % ) estimated life ( in years ) ********************** 5 5 5 .

Answer: 210000

Question: what was the change in advertising costs from 2002 to 2003?

Answer: 173000

Answer: 173000


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in operating income for entities in which the company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control and that are accounted for using the equity method between 2001 and 2002?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2003-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -60%.

Rejected response: 49%.

AES || what was the percentage change in operating income for entities in which the company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control and that are accounted for using the equity method <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in operating income for entities in which the company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control and that are accounted for using the equity method between 2001 and 2002?

Answer: -60%

as of and for the years ended december 31 , the operating income of 2003 is 1039 ; the operating income of 2002 ( 1 ) is 695 ; the operating income of 2001 ( 1 ) is 1717 ;

the following tables present summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) of the entities in which the company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control and that are accounted for using the equity method. .

cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment .

during the fourth quarter of 2003 , the company sold its 25% ( 25 % ) ownership interest in medway power limited ( 2018 2018mpl 2019 2019 ) , a 688 mw natural gas-fired combined cycle facility located in the united kingdom , and aes medway operations limited ( 2018 2018aesmo 2019 2019 ) , the operating company for the facility , in an aggregate transaction valued at approximately a347 million ( $ 78 million ) .

as of and for the years ended december 31, the revenues of 2003 is $ 2758 ; the revenues of 2002 ( 1 ) is $ 2832 ; the revenues of 2001 ( 1 ) is $ 6147 ;

Answer: -60%

Question: what was the percentage change in operating income for entities in which the company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control and that are accounted for using the equity method between 2002 and 2003?

Answer: 49%

Answer: 49%