Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2012 to 2013 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1.9.

Rejected response: -11.5.

LMT || what was the change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations <TIME> , in millions?

Question: what was the change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2012 to 2013 , in millions?

Answer: -1.9

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2013 is 326.5 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2012 is 328.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2011 is 339.9 ;

The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2013 is 320.9 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2012 is 323.7 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2011 is 335.9 ;

note 3 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2013 is 320.9 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2012 is 323.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2011 is 335.9 ;

Answer: -1.9

Question: what was the change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2011 to 2012 , in millions?

Answer: -11.5

in addition to the severance charges described above , we expect to incur accelerated and incremental costs ( e.g. , accelerated depreciation expense related to long-lived assets at the sites to be closed , relocation of equipment and other employee related costs ) of approximately $ 15 million , $ 50 million , and $ 135 million at our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments related to the facility closures and consolidations .

Answer: -11.5

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2011 to 2012 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -11.5.

Rejected response: -1.9.

Question: what was the change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2011 to 2012 , in millions?

Answer: -11.5

in addition to the severance charges described above , we expect to incur accelerated and incremental costs ( e.g. , accelerated depreciation expense related to long-lived assets at the sites to be closed , relocation of equipment and other employee related costs ) of approximately $ 15 million , $ 50 million , and $ 135 million at our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments related to the facility closures and consolidations .

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2013 is 320.9 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2012 is 323.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2011 is 335.9 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2013 is 326.5 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2012 is 328.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2011 is 339.9 ;

Answer: -11.5

Question: what was the change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2012 to 2013 , in millions?

Answer: -1.9

note 3 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .

Answer: -1.9


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 183%.

Rejected response: 276%.

ETR || what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities <TIME>?

Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 183%

the 2016 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 270852 ;

the 2017 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 766801 ;

the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Answer: 183%

Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 276%

the 2016 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 204079 ;

the 2017 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 766451 ;

entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .

the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Answer: 276%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 183%.

Rejected response: 7.04%.

Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 183%

the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

the 2016 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 270852 ;

the 2017 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 766801 ;

Answer: 183%

Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2018 to 2019?

Answer: 7.04%

the 2018 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 822690 ;

the 2019 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 768588 ;

the 2020 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 1631181 ;

Answer: 7.04%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 276%.

Rejected response: 183%.

Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 276%

the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

the 2016 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 204079 ;

the 2017 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 766451 ;

Answer: 276%

Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 183%

the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

the 2016 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 270852 ;

the 2017 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 766801 ;

Answer: 183%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 276%.

Rejected response: 7.04%.

Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 276%

the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

the 2016 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 204079 ;

the 2017 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 766451 ;

Answer: 276%

Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2018 to 2019?

Answer: 7.04%

the 2018 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 822690 ;

the 2019 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 768588 ;

the 2020 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 1631181 ;

Answer: 7.04%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2018 to 2019?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2020-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7.04%.

Rejected response: 183%.

Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2018 to 2019?

Answer: 7.04%

the 2018 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 822690 ;

the 2019 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 768588 ;

the 2020 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 1631181 ;

Answer: 7.04%

Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 183%

the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

the 2016 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 270852 ;

the 2017 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 766801 ;

Answer: 183%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2018 to 2019?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2020-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7.04%.

Rejected response: 276%.

Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2018 to 2019?

Answer: 7.04%

the 2018 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 822690 ;

the 2019 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 768588 ;

the 2020 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 1631181 ;

Answer: 7.04%

Question: what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 276%

the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

the 2016 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 204079 ;

the 2017 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 766451 ;

Answer: 276%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in operating profit for space systems in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.9%.

Rejected response: 3.2%.

LMT || what is the growth rate in operating profit for space systems <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in operating profit for space systems in 2012?

Answer: 1.9%

the operating profit of 2012 is 1083 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 1063 ; the operating profit of 2010 is 1030 ;

space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems .

2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 186 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 .

the net sales of 2012 is $ 8347 ; the net sales of 2011 is $ 8161 ; the net sales of 2010 is $ 8268 ;

the operating margins of 2012 is 13.0% ( 13.0 % ) ; the operating margins of 2011 is 13.0% ( 13.0 % ) ; the operating margins of 2010 is 12.5% ( 12.5 % ) ;

Answer: 1.9%

Question: what is the growth rate in operating profit for space systems in 2011?

Answer: 3.2%

adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 55 million lower in 2011 compared to 2010 .

Answer: 3.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in operating profit for space systems in 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.2%.

Rejected response: 1.9%.

Question: what is the growth rate in operating profit for space systems in 2011?

Answer: 3.2%

the net sales of 2012 is $ 8347 ; the net sales of 2011 is $ 8161 ; the net sales of 2010 is $ 8268 ;

the operating profit of 2012 is 1083 ; the operating profit of 2011 is 1063 ; the operating profit of 2010 is 1030 ;

the operating margins of 2012 is 13.0% ( 13.0 % ) ; the operating margins of 2011 is 13.0% ( 13.0 % ) ; the operating margins of 2010 is 12.5% ( 12.5 % ) ;

Answer: 3.2%

Question: what is the growth rate in operating profit for space systems in 2012?

Answer: 1.9%

Answer: 1.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in the percentage of sales to restaurants from 2018 to 2019?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2020-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 0%.

Rejected response: 1%.

SYY || what was the change in the percentage of sales to restaurants <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in the percentage of sales to restaurants from 2018 to 2019?

Answer: 0%

type of customer the restaurants of 2019 is 62% ( 62 % ) ; the restaurants of 2018 is 62% ( 62 % ) ; the restaurants of 2017 is 61% ( 61 % ) ;

type of customer The other ( 1 ) of 2019 is 12 ; The other ( 1 ) of 2018 is 13 ; The other ( 1 ) of 2017 is 12 ;

type of customer The healthcare of 2019 is 8 ; The healthcare of 2018 is 9 ; The healthcare of 2017 is 9 ;

sysco corporation a0- a0form a010-k 3 part a0i item a01 a0business we estimate that our sales by type of customer during the past three fiscal years were as follows: .

we administer a consolidated product procurement program designed to develop , obtain and ensure consistent quality food and non-food products .

Answer: 0%

Question: what was the change in the percentage of sales to restaurants from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: 1%

see the discussion in item 7 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations - liquidity and capital resources 201d regarding our liquidity , financial position and sources and uses of funds .

Answer: 1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in the percentage of sales to restaurants from 2017 to 2018?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1%.

Rejected response: 0%.

Question: what was the change in the percentage of sales to restaurants from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: 1%

sysco corporation a0- a0form a010-k 3 part a0i item a01 a0business we estimate that our sales by type of customer during the past three fiscal years were as follows: .

type of customer the restaurants of 2019 is 62% ( 62 % ) ; the restaurants of 2018 is 62% ( 62 % ) ; the restaurants of 2017 is 61% ( 61 % ) ;

see the discussion in item 7 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations - liquidity and capital resources 201d regarding our liquidity , financial position and sources and uses of funds .

Answer: 1%

Question: what was the change in the percentage of sales to restaurants from 2018 to 2019?

Answer: 0%

we administer a consolidated product procurement program designed to develop , obtain and ensure consistent quality food and non-food products .

Answer: 0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the roi of nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -41.0%.

Rejected response: 10.8%.

CDNS || what is the roi of nasdaq composite <TIME>?

Question: what is the roi of nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: -41.0%

subtract(59.03, const_100), divide(#0, const_1000)

the nasdaq composite of 12/29/2007 is 100.00 ; the nasdaq composite of 1/3/2009 is 59.03 ; the nasdaq composite of 1/2/2010 is 82.25 ; the nasdaq composite of 1/1/2011 is 97.32 ; the nasdaq composite of 12/31/2011 is 98.63 ; the nasdaq composite of 12/29/2012 is 110.78 ;

comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .

stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .

nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .

the cadence design systems inc . of 12/29/2007 is 100.00 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 1/3/2009 is 22.55 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 1/2/2010 is 35.17 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 1/1/2011 is 48.50 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 12/31/2011 is 61.07 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 12/29/2012 is 78.92 ;

Answer: -41.0%

Question: what is the roi of nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2012?

Answer: 10.8%

subtract(110.78, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

Answer: 10.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the roi of nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10.8%.

Rejected response: -41.0%.

Question: what is the roi of nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2012?

Answer: 10.8%

subtract(110.78, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .

the cadence design systems inc . of 12/29/2007 is 100.00 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 1/3/2009 is 22.55 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 1/2/2010 is 35.17 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 1/1/2011 is 48.50 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 12/31/2011 is 61.07 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 12/29/2012 is 78.92 ;

the nasdaq composite of 12/29/2007 is 100.00 ; the nasdaq composite of 1/3/2009 is 59.03 ; the nasdaq composite of 1/2/2010 is 82.25 ; the nasdaq composite of 1/1/2011 is 97.32 ; the nasdaq composite of 12/31/2011 is 98.63 ; the nasdaq composite of 12/29/2012 is 110.78 ;

Answer: 10.8%

Question: what is the roi of nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: -41.0%

subtract(59.03, const_100), divide(#0, const_1000)

Answer: -41.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2006 what percentage of consumer packaging sales were represented by foodservice net sales?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 16%.

Rejected response: 19%.

IP || <TIME> what percentage of consumer packaging sales were represented by foodservice net sales?

Question: in 2006 what percentage of consumer packaging sales were represented by foodservice net sales?

Answer: 16%

in millions the sales of 2006 is $ 2455 ; the sales of 2005 is $ 2245 ; the sales of 2004 is $ 2295 ;

foodservice net sales declined to $ 396 million in 2006 , compared with $ 437 million in 2005 and $ 480 million in 2004 , due principally to the sale of the jackson , tennessee plant in july 2005 .

consumer packaging net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2005 and 7% ( 7 % ) compared with 2004 .

in millions the operating profit of 2006 is $ 131 ; the operating profit of 2005 is $ 121 ; the operating profit of 2004 is $ 155 ;

Answer: 16%

Question: in 2005 what percentage of consumer packaging sales were represented by foodservice net sales?

Answer: 19%

Answer: 19%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2005 what percentage of consumer packaging sales were represented by foodservice net sales?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 19%.

Rejected response: 16%.

Question: in 2005 what percentage of consumer packaging sales were represented by foodservice net sales?

Answer: 19%

in millions the sales of 2006 is $ 2455 ; the sales of 2005 is $ 2245 ; the sales of 2004 is $ 2295 ;

in millions the operating profit of 2006 is $ 131 ; the operating profit of 2005 is $ 121 ; the operating profit of 2004 is $ 155 ;

foodservice net sales declined to $ 396 million in 2006 , compared with $ 437 million in 2005 and $ 480 million in 2004 , due principally to the sale of the jackson , tennessee plant in july 2005 .

Answer: 19%

Question: in 2006 what percentage of consumer packaging sales were represented by foodservice net sales?

Answer: 16%

Answer: 16%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by european industrial packaging net sales in 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 20%.

Rejected response: 21%.

IP || what percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by european industrial packaging net sales <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by european industrial packaging net sales in 2006?

Answer: 20%

multiply(const_1, const_1000), divide(#0, 4925)

in millions the sales of 2007 is $ 5245 ; the sales of 2006 is $ 4925 ; the sales of 2005 is $ 4625 ;

european industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 1.1 billion , up from $ 1.0 billion in 2006 and $ 880 million in 2005 .

industrial packaging in millions 2007 2006 2005 .

in millions the operating profit of 2007 is $ 501 ; the operating profit of 2006 is $ 399 ; the operating profit of 2005 is $ 219 ;

Answer: 20%

Question: what percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by european industrial packaging net sales in 2007?

Answer: 21%

Answer: 21%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by european industrial packaging net sales in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 21%.

Rejected response: 20%.

Question: what percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by european industrial packaging net sales in 2007?

Answer: 21%

in millions the sales of 2007 is $ 5245 ; the sales of 2006 is $ 4925 ; the sales of 2005 is $ 4625 ;

in millions the operating profit of 2007 is $ 501 ; the operating profit of 2006 is $ 399 ; the operating profit of 2005 is $ 219 ;

european industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 1.1 billion , up from $ 1.0 billion in 2006 and $ 880 million in 2005 .

Answer: 21%

Question: what percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by european industrial packaging net sales in 2006?

Answer: 20%

multiply(const_1, const_1000), divide(#0, 4925)

Answer: 20%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1%.

Rejected response: -5%.

AES || what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -1%

december 31 , the balance at december 31 of 2016 is $ 369 ; the balance at december 31 of 2015 is $ 373 ; the balance at december 31 of 2014 is $ 394 ;

however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty .

the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

december 31, the balance at january 1 of 2016 is $ 373 ; the balance at january 1 of 2015 is $ 394 ; the balance at january 1 of 2014 is $ 392 ;

december 31, the balance at december 31 of 2016 is $ 369 ; the balance at december 31 of 2015 is $ 373 ; the balance at december 31 of 2014 is $ 394 ;

Answer: -1%

Question: what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -5%

Answer: -5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5%.

Rejected response: -1%.

Question: what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -5%

the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

december 31, the balance at january 1 of 2016 is $ 373 ; the balance at january 1 of 2015 is $ 394 ; the balance at january 1 of 2014 is $ 392 ;

december 31, the balance at december 31 of 2016 is $ 369 ; the balance at december 31 of 2015 is $ 373 ; the balance at december 31 of 2014 is $ 394 ;

Answer: -5%

Question: what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -1%

Answer: -1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in rent expenses between 2010 and 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5.

Rejected response: 26.

IP || what was the change in rent expenses <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in rent expenses between 2010 and 2011?

Answer: -5

rent expense was $ 231 million , $ 205 million and $ 210 million for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .

in june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million .

in millions the total of 2013 is $ 3411 ; the total of 2014 is $ 964 ; the total of 2015 is $ 828 ; the total of 2016 is $ 690 ; the total of 2017 is $ 858 ; the total of thereafter is $ 2795 ;

in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 46 million at december 31 , 2012 .

Answer: -5

Question: what was the change in rent expenses between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: 26

Answer: 26


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in rent expenses between 2011 and 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 26.

Rejected response: -5.

Question: what was the change in rent expenses between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: 26

in millions the total of 2013 is $ 3411 ; the total of 2014 is $ 964 ; the total of 2015 is $ 828 ; the total of 2016 is $ 690 ; the total of 2017 is $ 858 ; the total of thereafter is $ 2795 ;

rent expense was $ 231 million , $ 205 million and $ 210 million for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .

in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 46 million at december 31 , 2012 .

Answer: 26

Question: what was the change in rent expenses between 2010 and 2011?

Answer: -5

Answer: -5


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in proportional free cash flow between 2013 and 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -30%.

Rejected response: 39%.

AES || what was the percentage change in proportional free cash flow <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in proportional free cash flow between 2013 and 2014?

Answer: -30%

calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) the proportional free cash flow of 2015 is $ 1241 ; the proportional free cash flow of 2014 is $ 891 ; the proportional free cash flow of 2013 is $ 1271 ; the proportional free cash flow of 2015/2014 change is $ 350 ; the proportional free cash flow of 2014/2013 change is $ -380 ( 380 ) ;

calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 2015/2014change 2014/2013 change .

calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) The proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2015 is 1741 ; The proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2014 is 1432 ; The proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2013 is 1881 ; The proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2015/2014 change is 309 ; The proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2014/2013 change is -449 ( 449 ) ;

calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) the net cash provided by operating activities of 2015 is $ 2134 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2014 is $ 1791 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2013 is $ 2715 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2015/2014 change is $ 343 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2014/2013 change is $ -924 ( 924 ) ;

calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) the proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2015 is 1741 ; the proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2014 is 1432 ; the proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2013 is 1881 ; the proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2015/2014 change is 309 ; the proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2014/2013 change is -449 ( 449 ) ;

Answer: -30%

Question: what was the percentage change in proportional free cash flow between 2014 and 2015?

Answer: 39%

Answer: 39%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in proportional free cash flow between 2014 and 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 39%.

Rejected response: -30%.

Question: what was the percentage change in proportional free cash flow between 2014 and 2015?

Answer: 39%

calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) the net cash provided by operating activities of 2015 is $ 2134 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2014 is $ 1791 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2013 is $ 2715 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2015/2014 change is $ 343 ; the net cash provided by operating activities of 2014/2013 change is $ -924 ( 924 ) ;

calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) the proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2015 is 1741 ; the proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2014 is 1432 ; the proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2013 is 1881 ; the proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2015/2014 change is 309 ; the proportional adjusted operating cash flow of 2014/2013 change is -449 ( 449 ) ;

calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) the proportional free cash flow of 2015 is $ 1241 ; the proportional free cash flow of 2014 is $ 891 ; the proportional free cash flow of 2013 is $ 1271 ; the proportional free cash flow of 2015/2014 change is $ 350 ; the proportional free cash flow of 2014/2013 change is $ -380 ( 380 ) ;

Answer: 39%

Question: what was the percentage change in proportional free cash flow between 2013 and 2014?

Answer: -30%

Answer: -30%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the tax expense related to discontinued operations in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 25.

Rejected response: 7.

DISH || what is the tax expense related to discontinued operations <TIME>?

Question: what is the tax expense related to discontinued operations in 2012?

Answer: 25

201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , before income taxes 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 54 million , $ 62 million and $ 3 million , respectively .

in addition , 201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , net of tax 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 47 million , $ 37 million and $ 7 million , respectively .

during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the revenue from our discontinued operations was $ 503 million , $ 1.085 billion and $ 974 million , respectively .

Answer: 25

Question: what is the tax expense related to discontinued operations in 2013?

Answer: 7

subsequently , in the third quarter 2013 , this uncertain tax position was resolved and $ 102 million was reversed and recorded as a decrease in 201cincome tax ( provision ) benefit , net 201d on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) for the year ended december 31 , 2013 .

Answer: 7


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the tax expense related to discontinued operations in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7.

Rejected response: 25.

Question: what is the tax expense related to discontinued operations in 2013?

Answer: 7

during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the revenue from our discontinued operations was $ 503 million , $ 1.085 billion and $ 974 million , respectively .

201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , before income taxes 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 54 million , $ 62 million and $ 3 million , respectively .

in addition , 201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , net of tax 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 47 million , $ 37 million and $ 7 million , respectively .

Answer: 7

Question: what is the tax expense related to discontinued operations in 2012?

Answer: 25

Answer: 25


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3.1%.

Rejected response: 13.4%.

ADBE || what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -3.1%

the beginning balance of 2018 is $ 172945 ; the beginning balance of 2017 is $ 178413 ;

the ending balance of 2018 is $ 196152 ; the ending balance of 2017 is $ 172945 ;

accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2018 and 2017 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Answer: -3.1%

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: 13.4%

for fiscal 2018 , the total change in the valuation allowance was $ 80.9 million .

the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions of 2018 is 60721 ; the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions of 2017 is 24927 ;

Answer: 13.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2017 to 2018?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.4%.

Rejected response: -3.1%.

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: 13.4%

the beginning balance of 2018 is $ 172945 ; the beginning balance of 2017 is $ 178413 ;

the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions of 2018 is 60721 ; the gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions of 2017 is 24927 ;

the ending balance of 2018 is $ 196152 ; the ending balance of 2017 is $ 172945 ;

Answer: 13.4%

Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -3.1%

accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2018 and 2017 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Answer: -3.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total other assets in 2012 was comprised of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: 24%.

GS || what percentage of total other assets <TIME> was comprised of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets?

Question: what percentage of total other assets in 2012 was comprised of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets?

Answer: 13%

in millions the goodwill and identifiable intangibleassets2 of as of december 2012 is 5099 ; the goodwill and identifiable intangibleassets2 of as of december 2011 is 5468 ;

in millions the total of as of december 2012 is $ 39623 ; the total of as of december 2011 is $ 23152 ;

see note 13 for further information about goodwill and identifiable intangible assets .

the table below presents other assets by type. .

Answer: 13%

Question: what percentage of total other assets in 2011 was comprised of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets?

Answer: 24%

Answer: 24%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total other assets in 2011 was comprised of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 24%.

Rejected response: 13%.

Question: what percentage of total other assets in 2011 was comprised of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets?

Answer: 24%

the table below presents other assets by type. .

in millions the goodwill and identifiable intangibleassets2 of as of december 2012 is 5099 ; the goodwill and identifiable intangibleassets2 of as of december 2011 is 5468 ;

in millions the total of as of december 2012 is $ 39623 ; the total of as of december 2011 is $ 23152 ;

Answer: 24%

Question: what percentage of total other assets in 2012 was comprised of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets?

Answer: 13%

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: considering the year 2013 , what is the sales to operating income ratio?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6.88.

Rejected response: 9.41.

APD || considering the year <TIME> , what is the sales to operating income ratio?

Question: considering the year 2013 , what is the sales to operating income ratio?

Answer: 6.88

Explanation: it is the value of sales divided by the operating income .

the sales of 2013 is $ 451.1 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 420.1 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 400.6 ;

the operating income of 2013 is 65.5 ; the operating income of 2012 is 44.6 ; the operating income of 2011 is 62.8 ;

2012 other operating loss was $ 4.7 , compared to $ 6.6 in the prior year .

operating income of $ 65.5 increased from the higher lng project activity .

Answer: 6.88

Question: considering the year 2012 , what is the sales to operating income ratio?

Answer: 9.41

Answer: 9.41


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: considering the year 2012 , what is the sales to operating income ratio?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9.41.

Rejected response: 6.88.

Question: considering the year 2012 , what is the sales to operating income ratio?

Answer: 9.41

Explanation: it is the value of sales divided by the operating income .

the sales of 2013 is $ 451.1 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 420.1 ; the sales of 2011 is $ 400.6 ;

the operating income of 2013 is 65.5 ; the operating income of 2012 is 44.6 ; the operating income of 2011 is 62.8 ;

operating income of $ 65.5 increased from the higher lng project activity .

Answer: 9.41

Question: considering the year 2013 , what is the sales to operating income ratio?

Answer: 6.88

Answer: 6.88


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the change in total debt to be repaid in the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 between 2008 and 2007?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -262.

Rejected response: 2022.

IP || what is the change in total debt to be repaid in the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations <TIME> <TIME>?

Question: what is the change in total debt to be repaid in the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 between 2008 and 2007?

Answer: -262

in millions the total debt of 2006 is $ 1181 ; the total debt of 2007 is $ 570 ; the total debt of 2008 is $ 308 ; the total debt of 2009 is $ 2330 ; the total debt of 2010 is $ 1534 ; the total debt of thereafter is $ 6281 ;

contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obli- gations at december 31 , 2005 , were as follows : in millions 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 thereafter .

in millions The lease obligations of 2006 is 172 ; The lease obligations of 2007 is 144 ; The lease obligations of 2008 is 119 ; The lease obligations of 2009 is 76 ; The lease obligations of 2010 is 63 ; The lease obligations of thereafter is 138 ;

in millions the lease obligations of 2006 is 172 ; the lease obligations of 2007 is 144 ; the lease obligations of 2008 is 119 ; the lease obligations of 2009 is 76 ; the lease obligations of 2010 is 63 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is 138 ;

in millions the total of 2006 is $ 4617 ; the total of 2007 is $ 1107 ; the total of 2008 is $ 707 ; the total of 2009 is $ 2646 ; the total of 2010 is $ 1801 ; the total of thereafter is $ 7657 ;

Answer: -262

Question: what is the change in total debt to be repaid in the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 between 2009 and 2008?

Answer: 2022

Answer: 2022


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the change in total debt to be repaid in the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 between 2009 and 2008?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2022.

Rejected response: -262.

Question: what is the change in total debt to be repaid in the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 between 2009 and 2008?

Answer: 2022

in millions the total debt of 2006 is $ 1181 ; the total debt of 2007 is $ 570 ; the total debt of 2008 is $ 308 ; the total debt of 2009 is $ 2330 ; the total debt of 2010 is $ 1534 ; the total debt of thereafter is $ 6281 ;

in millions the lease obligations of 2006 is 172 ; the lease obligations of 2007 is 144 ; the lease obligations of 2008 is 119 ; the lease obligations of 2009 is 76 ; the lease obligations of 2010 is 63 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is 138 ;

in millions the total of 2006 is $ 4617 ; the total of 2007 is $ 1107 ; the total of 2008 is $ 707 ; the total of 2009 is $ 2646 ; the total of 2010 is $ 1801 ; the total of thereafter is $ 7657 ;

Answer: 2022

Question: what is the change in total debt to be repaid in the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 between 2008 and 2007?

Answer: -262

Answer: -262


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var is comprised of equity in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 55%.

Rejected response: 57%.

GS || what percentage of total market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var is comprised of equity <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var is comprised of equity in 2016?

Answer: 55%

$ in millions the equity of as of december 2017 is $ 2096 ; the equity of as of december 2016 is $ 2085 ; the equity of as of december 2015 is $ 2157 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2017 is $ 3702 ; the total of as of december 2016 is $ 3787 ; the total of as of december 2015 is $ 3636 ;

the table below presents market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var by asset category. .

Answer: 55%

Question: what percentage of total market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var is comprised of equity in 2017?

Answer: 57%

Answer: 57%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var is comprised of equity in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 57%.

Rejected response: 55%.

Question: what percentage of total market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var is comprised of equity in 2017?

Answer: 57%

the table below presents market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var by asset category. .

$ in millions the equity of as of december 2017 is $ 2096 ; the equity of as of december 2016 is $ 2085 ; the equity of as of december 2015 is $ 2157 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2017 is $ 3702 ; the total of as of december 2016 is $ 3787 ; the total of as of december 2015 is $ 3636 ;

Answer: 57%

Question: what percentage of total market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var is comprised of equity in 2016?

Answer: 55%

Answer: 55%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what are the future minimum commitments under the operating leases in 2014 as a percentage of the total future minimum commitments?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10.5%.

Rejected response: 9.88%.

BLK || what are the future minimum commitments under the operating leases <TIME> as a percentage of the total future minimum commitments?

Question: what are the future minimum commitments under the operating leases in 2014 as a percentage of the total future minimum commitments?

Answer: 10.5%

future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .

Answer: 10.5%

Question: what are the future minimum commitments under the operating leases in 2015 as a percentage of the total future minimum commitments?

Answer: 9.88%

Answer: 9.88%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what are the future minimum commitments under the operating leases in 2015 as a percentage of the total future minimum commitments?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9.88%.

Rejected response: 10.5%.

Question: what are the future minimum commitments under the operating leases in 2015 as a percentage of the total future minimum commitments?

Answer: 9.88%

future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .

Answer: 9.88%

Question: what are the future minimum commitments under the operating leases in 2014 as a percentage of the total future minimum commitments?

Answer: 10.5%

Answer: 10.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in amortization expense from from 2008 to 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.0%.

Rejected response: 4.2%.

AMT || what is the percentage change in amortization expense from <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in amortization expense from from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: 2.0%

the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively .

amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) .

The less accumulated amortization of 2004 is -517444 ( 517444 ) ; The less accumulated amortization of 2003 is -434381 ( 434381 ) ;

the less accumulated amortization of 2004 is -517444 ( 517444 ) ; the less accumulated amortization of 2003 is -434381 ( 434381 ) ;

Answer: 2.0%

Question: what is the percentage change in amortization expense from from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 4.2%

Answer: 4.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in amortization expense from from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.2%.

Rejected response: 2.0%.

Question: what is the percentage change in amortization expense from from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 4.2%

the less accumulated amortization of 2004 is -517444 ( 517444 ) ; the less accumulated amortization of 2003 is -434381 ( 434381 ) ;

amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) .

the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively .

Answer: 4.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in amortization expense from from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: 2.0%

Answer: 2.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage increase in total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 37.7%.

Rejected response: 62.9%.

PM || what is the percentage increase in total accumulated other comprehensive losses <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage increase in total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 37.7%

( losses ) earnings ( in millions ) the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of ( losses ) earnings 2015 is $ -9402 ( 9402 ) ; the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of ( losses ) earnings 2014 is $ -6826 ( 6826 ) ; the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of 2013 is $ -4190 ( 4190 ) ;

accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .

reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 .

Answer: 37.7%

Question: what is the percentage increase in total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 62.9%

Answer: 62.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage increase in total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 62.9%.

Rejected response: 37.7%.

Question: what is the percentage increase in total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 62.9%

accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .

( losses ) earnings ( in millions ) the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of ( losses ) earnings 2015 is $ -9402 ( 9402 ) ; the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of ( losses ) earnings 2014 is $ -6826 ( 6826 ) ; the total accumulated other comprehensive losses of 2013 is $ -4190 ( 4190 ) ;

reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 .

Answer: 62.9%

Question: what is the percentage increase in total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 37.7%

Answer: 37.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in these equity investment balances , what is the percent of unfunded commitments at december 31 , 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-12-31 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6.3%.

Rejected response: 7.5%.

PNC || in these equity investment balances , what is the percent of unfunded commitments <TIME>?

Question: in these equity investment balances , what is the percent of unfunded commitments at december 31 , 2012?

Answer: 6.3%

in millions the total of december 312013 is $ 10664 ; the total of december 312012 is $ 10877 ;

the primary risk measurement , similar to other equity investments , is economic capital .

these equity investment balances include unfunded commitments totaling $ 802 million and $ 685 million at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , respectively .

these investments , as well as equity investments held by consolidated partnerships , totaled $ 2.7 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 3.0 billion at december 31 , 2012 .

see item 1 business 2013 supervision and regulation and item 1a risk factors of this report for discussion of the potential impacts of the volcker rule provisions of dodd-frank on our interests in and sponsorship of private funds covered by the volcker our unfunded commitments related to private equity totaled $ 164 million at december 31 , 2013 compared with $ 182 million at december 31 , 2012 .

Answer: 6.3%

Question: in these equity investment balances , what is the percent of unfunded commitments at december 31 , 2013?

Answer: 7.5%

Answer: 7.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in these equity investment balances , what is the percent of unfunded commitments at december 31 , 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-12-31 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7.5%.

Rejected response: 6.3%.

Question: in these equity investment balances , what is the percent of unfunded commitments at december 31 , 2013?

Answer: 7.5%

these investments , as well as equity investments held by consolidated partnerships , totaled $ 2.7 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 3.0 billion at december 31 , 2012 .

these equity investment balances include unfunded commitments totaling $ 802 million and $ 685 million at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , respectively .

see item 1 business 2013 supervision and regulation and item 1a risk factors of this report for discussion of the potential impacts of the volcker rule provisions of dodd-frank on our interests in and sponsorship of private funds covered by the volcker our unfunded commitments related to private equity totaled $ 164 million at december 31 , 2013 compared with $ 182 million at december 31 , 2012 .

Answer: 7.5%

Question: in these equity investment balances , what is the percent of unfunded commitments at december 31 , 2012?

Answer: 6.3%

Answer: 6.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -11.6.

Rejected response: -12.5.

LMT || what was the change in millions of weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in millions of weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -11.6

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2017 is 290.6 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2016 is 303.1 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2015 is 314.7 ;

The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2017 is 287.8 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2016 is 299.3 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2015 is 310.3 ;

we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respectiveweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .

note 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows ( in millions ) : .

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2017 is 287.8 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2016 is 299.3 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2015 is 310.3 ;

Answer: -11.6

Question: what was the change in millions of weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -12.5

Answer: -12.5


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -12.5.

Rejected response: -11.6.

Question: what was the change in millions of weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -12.5

note 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows ( in millions ) : .

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2017 is 287.8 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2016 is 299.3 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2015 is 310.3 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2017 is 290.6 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2016 is 303.1 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2015 is 314.7 ;

Answer: -12.5

Question: what was the change in millions of weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: -11.6

Answer: -11.6


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: north american consumer packaging net sales where what percentage of consumer packaging sales in 2009?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 72%.

Rejected response: 78%.

IP || north american consumer packaging net sales where what percentage of consumer packaging sales <TIME>?

Question: north american consumer packaging net sales where what percentage of consumer packaging sales in 2009?

Answer: 72%

in millions the sales of 2009 is $ 3060 ; the sales of 2008 is $ 3195 ; the sales of 2007 is $ 3015 ;

north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.2 billion compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2008 and $ 2.4 billion in 2007 .

consumer packaging net sales in 2009 decreased 4% ( 4 % ) compared with 2008 and increased 1% ( 1 % ) compared with 2007 .

in millions the operating profit of 2009 is 433 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 17 ; the operating profit of 2007 is 112 ;

Answer: 72%

Question: north american consumer packaging net sales where what percentage of consumer packaging sales in 2008?

Answer: 78%

consumer packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 .

Answer: 78%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: north american consumer packaging net sales where what percentage of consumer packaging sales in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 78%.

Rejected response: 72%.

Question: north american consumer packaging net sales where what percentage of consumer packaging sales in 2008?

Answer: 78%

consumer packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 .

in millions the sales of 2009 is $ 3060 ; the sales of 2008 is $ 3195 ; the sales of 2007 is $ 3015 ;

north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.2 billion compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2008 and $ 2.4 billion in 2007 .

Answer: 78%

Question: north american consumer packaging net sales where what percentage of consumer packaging sales in 2009?

Answer: 72%

in millions the operating profit of 2009 is 433 ; the operating profit of 2008 is 17 ; the operating profit of 2007 is 112 ;

Answer: 72%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -124.

Rejected response: 21.7.

ETR || what is the net change in net revenue <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2016?

Answer: -124

the 2015 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1666 ;

the 2016 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1542 ;

entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .

the other of amount ( in millions ) is -4 ( 4 ) ;

Answer: -124

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2008?

Answer: 21.7

the 2007 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 231.0 ;

the 2008 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 252.7 ;

following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .

the rider revenue of amount ( in millions ) is 3.9 ;

Answer: 21.7


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 21.7.

Rejected response: -124.

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2008?

Answer: 21.7

the 2007 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 231.0 ;

the rider revenue of amount ( in millions ) is 3.9 ;

the 2008 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 252.7 ;

Answer: 21.7

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2016?

Answer: -124

the 2015 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1666 ;

the other of amount ( in millions ) is -4 ( 4 ) ;

the 2016 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1542 ;

Answer: -124


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the return on total assets during 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 4.2%.

Rejected response: 5.4%.

HII || what was the return on total assets <TIME>?

Question: what was the return on total assets during 2013?

Answer: 4.2%

Explanation: net income over total assets

( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2017 is 479 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2016 is 573 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2015 is 404 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2014 is 338 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of year ended december 31 2013 is 261 ;

( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the total assets of year ended december 31 2017 is 6374 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2016 is 6352 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2015 is 6024 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2014 is 6239 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2013 is 6190 ;

( $ in millions except per share amounts ) The total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2017 is 3225 ; The total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2016 is 3356 ; The total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2015 is 3260 ; The total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2014 is 3562 ; The total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2013 is 3277 ;

( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2017 is 3225 ; the total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2016 is 3356 ; the total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2015 is 3260 ; the total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2014 is 3562 ; the total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2013 is 3277 ;

( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the dividends declared per share of year ended december 31 2017 is $ 2.52 ; the dividends declared per share of year ended december 31 2016 is $ 2.10 ; the dividends declared per share of year ended december 31 2015 is $ 1.70 ; the dividends declared per share of year ended december 31 2014 is $ 1.00 ; the dividends declared per share of year ended december 31 2013 is $ 0.50 ;

Answer: 4.2%

Question: what was the return on total assets during 2014?

Answer: 5.4%

Answer: 5.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the return on total assets during 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5.4%.

Rejected response: 4.2%.

Question: what was the return on total assets during 2014?

Answer: 5.4%

( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the total assets of year ended december 31 2017 is 6374 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2016 is 6352 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2015 is 6024 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2014 is 6239 ; the total assets of year ended december 31 2013 is 6190 ;

( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2017 is 3225 ; the total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2016 is 3356 ; the total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2015 is 3260 ; the total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2014 is 3562 ; the total long-term obligations of year ended december 31 2013 is 3277 ;

( $ in millions except per share amounts ) the dividends declared per share of year ended december 31 2017 is $ 2.52 ; the dividends declared per share of year ended december 31 2016 is $ 2.10 ; the dividends declared per share of year ended december 31 2015 is $ 1.70 ; the dividends declared per share of year ended december 31 2014 is $ 1.00 ; the dividends declared per share of year ended december 31 2013 is $ 0.50 ;

Answer: 5.4%

Question: what was the return on total assets during 2013?

Answer: 4.2%

Explanation: net income over total assets

Answer: 4.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the roi of an investment in loews common stock from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2.6%.

Rejected response: 6.0%.

L || what is the roi of an investment in loews common stock <TIME>?

Question: what is the roi of an investment in loews common stock from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: -2.6%

subtract(97.37, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the loews common stock of 2010 is 100.0 ; the loews common stock of 2011 is 97.37 ; the loews common stock of 2012 is 106.04 ; the loews common stock of 2013 is 126.23 ; the loews common stock of 2014 is 110.59 ; the loews common stock of 2015 is 101.72 ;

the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

The loews peer group ( a ) of 2010 is 100.0 ; The loews peer group ( a ) of 2011 is 101.59 ; The loews peer group ( a ) of 2012 is 115.19 ; The loews peer group ( a ) of 2013 is 145.12 ; The loews peer group ( a ) of 2014 is 152.84 ; The loews peer group ( a ) of 2015 is 144.70 ;

the loews peer group ( a ) of 2010 is 100.0 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2011 is 101.59 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2012 is 115.19 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2013 is 145.12 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2014 is 152.84 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2015 is 144.70 ;

Answer: -2.6%

Question: what is the roi of an investment in loews common stock from 2010 to 2012?

Answer: 6.0%

subtract(106.04, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

Answer: 6.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the roi of an investment in loews common stock from 2010 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6.0%.

Rejected response: -2.6%.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in loews common stock from 2010 to 2012?

Answer: 6.0%

subtract(106.04, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

the loews common stock of 2010 is 100.0 ; the loews common stock of 2011 is 97.37 ; the loews common stock of 2012 is 106.04 ; the loews common stock of 2013 is 126.23 ; the loews common stock of 2014 is 110.59 ; the loews common stock of 2015 is 101.72 ;

the loews peer group ( a ) of 2010 is 100.0 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2011 is 101.59 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2012 is 115.19 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2013 is 145.12 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2014 is 152.84 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2015 is 144.70 ;

Answer: 6.0%

Question: what is the roi of an investment in loews common stock from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: -2.6%

subtract(97.37, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

Answer: -2.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total inventories is comprised of finished goods in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 61%.

Rejected response: 62%.

CAG || what percentage of total inventories is comprised of finished goods <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total inventories is comprised of finished goods in 2008?

Answer: 61%

the finished goods of 2008 is 1179.1 ; the finished goods of 2007 is 1001.3 ;

the total of 2008 is $ 1931.5 ; the total of 2007 is $ 1625.1 ;

inventories the major classes of inventories are as follows: .

the work in progress of 2008 is 100.0 ; the work in progress of 2007 is 94.6 ;

Answer: 61%

Question: what percentage of total inventories is comprised of finished goods in 2007?

Answer: 62%

Answer: 62%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total inventories is comprised of finished goods in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 62%.

Rejected response: 61%.

Question: what percentage of total inventories is comprised of finished goods in 2007?

Answer: 62%

the work in progress of 2008 is 100.0 ; the work in progress of 2007 is 94.6 ;

the finished goods of 2008 is 1179.1 ; the finished goods of 2007 is 1001.3 ;

the total of 2008 is $ 1931.5 ; the total of 2007 is $ 1625.1 ;

Answer: 62%

Question: what percentage of total inventories is comprised of finished goods in 2008?

Answer: 61%

Answer: 61%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the number of stores during 2011?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.7%.

Rejected response: 3.4%.

AAP || what is the growth rate in the number of stores <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in the number of stores during 2011?

Answer: 2.7%

the ending stores of 2012 is 3576 ; the ending stores of 2011 is 3460 ; the ending stores of 2010 is 3369 ; the ending stores of 2009 is 3264 ; the ending stores of 2008 is 3243 ;

the following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years: .

The new stores ( 1 ) of 2012 is 116 ; The new stores ( 1 ) of 2011 is 95 ; The new stores ( 1 ) of 2010 is 110 ; The new stores ( 1 ) of 2009 is 75 ; The new stores ( 1 ) of 2008 is 109 ;

the beginning stores of 2012 is 3460 ; the beginning stores of 2011 is 3369 ; the beginning stores of 2010 is 3264 ; the beginning stores of 2009 is 3243 ; the beginning stores of 2008 is 3153 ;

the new stores ( 1 ) of 2012 is 116 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2011 is 95 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2010 is 110 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2009 is 75 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2008 is 109 ;

Answer: 2.7%

Question: what is the growth rate in the number of stores during 2012?

Answer: 3.4%

Answer: 3.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the number of stores during 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.4%.

Rejected response: 2.7%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the number of stores during 2012?

Answer: 3.4%

the beginning stores of 2012 is 3460 ; the beginning stores of 2011 is 3369 ; the beginning stores of 2010 is 3264 ; the beginning stores of 2009 is 3243 ; the beginning stores of 2008 is 3153 ;

the new stores ( 1 ) of 2012 is 116 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2011 is 95 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2010 is 110 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2009 is 75 ; the new stores ( 1 ) of 2008 is 109 ;

the ending stores of 2012 is 3576 ; the ending stores of 2011 is 3460 ; the ending stores of 2010 is 3369 ; the ending stores of 2009 is 3264 ; the ending stores of 2008 is 3243 ;

Answer: 3.4%

Question: what is the growth rate in the number of stores during 2011?

Answer: 2.7%

Answer: 2.7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in defined contribution plans expenses for the u.s . between 2015 and 2016 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2.3.

Rejected response: 5.4.

ZBH || what was the change in defined contribution plans expenses for the u.s . <TIME> in millions?

Question: what was the change in defined contribution plans expenses for the u.s . between 2015 and 2016 in millions?

Answer: 2.3

we expensed $ 47.9 million , $ 42.5 million and $ 40.2 million related to these plans for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

defined contribution plans we also sponsor defined contribution plans for substantially all of the u.s .

and puerto rico defined benefit retirement plans , nor do we expect to voluntarily contribute to these plans during 2018 .

the beginning balance of december 31 2017 is $ 78.7 ;

the ending balance of december 31 2017 is $ 91.0 ;

Answer: 2.3

Question: what was the change in defined contribution plans expenses for the u.s . between 2016 and 2017 in millions?

Answer: 5.4

The change in fair value of assets of december 31 2017 is 3.8 ;

Answer: 5.4


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in defined contribution plans expenses for the u.s . between 2016 and 2017 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5.4.

Rejected response: 2.3.

Question: what was the change in defined contribution plans expenses for the u.s . between 2016 and 2017 in millions?

Answer: 5.4

the beginning balance of december 31 2017 is $ 78.7 ;

the ending balance of december 31 2017 is $ 91.0 ;

we expensed $ 47.9 million , $ 42.5 million and $ 40.2 million related to these plans for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

Answer: 5.4

Question: what was the change in defined contribution plans expenses for the u.s . between 2015 and 2016 in millions?

Answer: 2.3

Answer: 2.3


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of average common equity attribution in 2017 is made up of institutional securities?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 58%.

Rejected response: 63%.

MS || what percentage of average common equity attribution <TIME> is made up of institutional securities?

Question: what percentage of average common equity attribution in 2017 is made up of institutional securities?

Answer: 58%

$ in billions the institutional securities of 2017 is $ 40.2 ; the institutional securities of 2016 is $ 43.2 ; the institutional securities of 2015 is $ 34.6 ;

$ in billions the total of 2017 is $ 69.8 ; the total of 2016 is $ 68.9 ; the total of 2015 is $ 66.9 ;

average common equity attribution1 $ in billions 2017 2016 2015 .

Answer: 58%

Question: what percentage of average common equity attribution in 2016 is made up of institutional securities?

Answer: 63%

Answer: 63%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of average common equity attribution in 2016 is made up of institutional securities?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 63%.

Rejected response: 58%.

Question: what percentage of average common equity attribution in 2016 is made up of institutional securities?

Answer: 63%

average common equity attribution1 $ in billions 2017 2016 2015 .

$ in billions the institutional securities of 2017 is $ 40.2 ; the institutional securities of 2016 is $ 43.2 ; the institutional securities of 2015 is $ 34.6 ;

$ in billions the total of 2017 is $ 69.8 ; the total of 2016 is $ 68.9 ; the total of 2015 is $ 66.9 ;

Answer: 63%

Question: what percentage of average common equity attribution in 2017 is made up of institutional securities?

Answer: 58%

Answer: 58%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage difference in the fair value per share between 2014 and 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 54%.

Rejected response: 71%.

EW || what is the percentage difference in the fair value per share <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage difference in the fair value per share between 2014 and 2015?

Answer: 54%

the fair value per share of 2016 is $ 31.00 ; the fair value per share of 2015 is $ 18.13 ; the fair value per share of 2014 is $ 11.75 ;

the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .

under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase .

the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .

Answer: 54%

Question: what is the percentage difference in the fair value per share between 2015 and 2016?

Answer: 71%

the expected volatility of 2016 is 33% ( 33 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2015 is 30% ( 30 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2014 is 31% ( 31 % ) ;

Answer: 71%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage difference in the fair value per share between 2015 and 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 71%.

Rejected response: 54%.

Question: what is the percentage difference in the fair value per share between 2015 and 2016?

Answer: 71%

the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .

the expected volatility of 2016 is 33% ( 33 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2015 is 30% ( 30 % ) ; the expected volatility of 2014 is 31% ( 31 % ) ;

the fair value per share of 2016 is $ 31.00 ; the fair value per share of 2015 is $ 18.13 ; the fair value per share of 2014 is $ 11.75 ;

Answer: 71%

Question: what is the percentage difference in the fair value per share between 2014 and 2015?

Answer: 54%

the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .

Answer: 54%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -4%.

Rejected response: -8%.

LMT || what was the percentage change in capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: -4%

capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment amounted to $ 820 million in 2010 , $ 852 million in 2009 , and $ 926 million in 2008 .

investing activities capital expenditures 2013 the majority of our capital expenditures relate to facilities infrastructure and equipment that are incurred to support new and existing programs across all of our business segments .

we also incur capital expenditures for it to support programs and general enterprise it infrastructure .

the increase primarily was attributable to an improvement in our operating working capital balances of $ 570 million as discussed below , and $ 187 million related to lower net income tax payments , as compared to 2009 .

financing activities share activity and dividends 2013 during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , we repurchased 33.0 million , 24.9 million , and 29.0 million shares of our common stock for $ 2483 million , $ 1851 million , and $ 2931 million .

Answer: -4%

Question: what was the percentage change in capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: -8%

cash received from the issuance of our common stock in connection with stock option exercises during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 totaled $ 59 million , $ 40 million , and $ 250 million .

Answer: -8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment from 2008 to 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -8%.

Rejected response: -4%.

Question: what was the percentage change in capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: -8%

capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment amounted to $ 820 million in 2010 , $ 852 million in 2009 , and $ 926 million in 2008 .

financing activities share activity and dividends 2013 during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , we repurchased 33.0 million , 24.9 million , and 29.0 million shares of our common stock for $ 2483 million , $ 1851 million , and $ 2931 million .

cash received from the issuance of our common stock in connection with stock option exercises during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 totaled $ 59 million , $ 40 million , and $ 250 million .

Answer: -8%

Question: what was the percentage change in capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: -4%

the increase primarily was attributable to an improvement in our operating working capital balances of $ 570 million as discussed below , and $ 187 million related to lower net income tax payments , as compared to 2009 .

Answer: -4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in industry segment operating profits between 2004 and 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -117.

Rejected response: 306.

IP || what was the change in industry segment operating profits <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in industry segment operating profits between 2004 and 2005?

Answer: -117

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1923 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2004 is $ 2040 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2003 is $ 1734 ;

results of operations industry segment operating profits are used by international paper 2019s management to measure the earn- ings performance of its businesses .

segment operating profit ( in millions ) .

in millions the discontinued operations of 2005 is 241 ; the discontinued operations of 2004 is -491 ( 491 ) ; the discontinued operations of 2003 is 57 ;

in millions the net earnings ( loss ) of 2005 is $ 1100 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2004 is $ -35 ( 35 ) ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2003 is $ 302 ;

Answer: -117

Question: what was the change in industry segment operating profits between 2003 and 2004?

Answer: 306

Answer: 306


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in industry segment operating profits between 2003 and 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 306.

Rejected response: -117.

Question: what was the change in industry segment operating profits between 2003 and 2004?

Answer: 306

in millions the industry segment operating profits of 2005 is $ 1923 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2004 is $ 2040 ; the industry segment operating profits of 2003 is $ 1734 ;

in millions the discontinued operations of 2005 is 241 ; the discontinued operations of 2004 is -491 ( 491 ) ; the discontinued operations of 2003 is 57 ;

in millions the net earnings ( loss ) of 2005 is $ 1100 ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2004 is $ -35 ( 35 ) ; the net earnings ( loss ) of 2003 is $ 302 ;

Answer: 306

Question: what was the change in industry segment operating profits between 2004 and 2005?

Answer: -117

Answer: -117


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the operating margin for 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10.61%.

Rejected response: 19.58%.

APD || what was the operating margin <TIME>?

Question: what was the operating margin for 2012?

Answer: 10.61%

Explanation: it is the operating income divided by the net sales in 2012 , then turned into a percentage .

the sales of 2014 is $ 450.4 ; the sales of 2013 is $ 451.1 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 420.1 ;

the operating income of 2014 is 88.2 ; the operating income of 2013 is 65.5 ; the operating income of 2012 is 44.6 ;

operating margin decreased 30 bp , primarily due to lower volumes and unfavorable price mix .

operating income of $ 321.3 decreased 25% ( 25 % ) , or $ 104.3 , and operating margin of 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) decreased 400 bp , as 2012 included a gain on the previously held equity interest in da nanomaterials of $ 85.9 .

Answer: 10.61%

Question: what was the operating margin for 2014?

Answer: 19.58%

Explanation: it is the operating income divided by the net sales in 2014 , then turned into a percentage .

operating margin of 17.4% ( 17.4 % ) increased 310 bp , primarily due to improved loading and leverage from the higher volumes and improved cost performance , partially offset by the unfavorable pricing impacts .

Answer: 19.58%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the operating margin for 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 19.58%.

Rejected response: 10.61%.

Question: what was the operating margin for 2014?

Answer: 19.58%

Explanation: it is the operating income divided by the net sales in 2014 , then turned into a percentage .

operating margin of 17.4% ( 17.4 % ) increased 310 bp , primarily due to improved loading and leverage from the higher volumes and improved cost performance , partially offset by the unfavorable pricing impacts .

the sales of 2014 is $ 450.4 ; the sales of 2013 is $ 451.1 ; the sales of 2012 is $ 420.1 ;

the operating income of 2014 is 88.2 ; the operating income of 2013 is 65.5 ; the operating income of 2012 is 44.6 ;

Answer: 19.58%

Question: what was the operating margin for 2012?

Answer: 10.61%

Explanation: it is the operating income divided by the net sales in 2012 , then turned into a percentage .

operating income of $ 321.3 decreased 25% ( 25 % ) , or $ 104.3 , and operating margin of 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) decreased 400 bp , as 2012 included a gain on the previously held equity interest in da nanomaterials of $ 85.9 .

Answer: 10.61%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in investment banking fees from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 20%.

Rejected response: 35%.

JPM || what was the percentage change in investment banking fees <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in investment banking fees from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 20%

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the investment banking fees of 2007 is $ 6635 ; the investment banking fees of 2006 is $ 5520 ; the investment banking fees of 2005 is $ 4088 ;

investment banking fees grew in 2007 to a level higher than the pre- vious record set in 2006 .

for a further discussion of investment banking fees , which are primarily recorded in ib , see the ib segment results on pages 40 201342 of this annual report .

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2007 is $ 71372 ; the total net revenue of 2006 is $ 61999 ; the total net revenue of 2005 is $ 54248 ;

Answer: 20%

Question: what was the percentage change in investment banking fees from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 35%

Answer: 35%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in investment banking fees from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 35%.

Rejected response: 20%.

Question: what was the percentage change in investment banking fees from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 35%

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the investment banking fees of 2007 is $ 6635 ; the investment banking fees of 2006 is $ 5520 ; the investment banking fees of 2005 is $ 4088 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2007 is $ 71372 ; the total net revenue of 2006 is $ 61999 ; the total net revenue of 2005 is $ 54248 ;

investment banking fees grew in 2007 to a level higher than the pre- vious record set in 2006 .

Answer: 35%

Question: what was the percentage change in investment banking fees from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 20%

Answer: 20%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the total amount of cash outflow used for shares repurchased during november 2007 , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2007-11-01 00:00:00 to 2007-12-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 20.7.

Rejected response: 37.8.

BLL || what is the total amount of cash outflow used for shares repurchased <TIME> , in millions?

Question: what is the total amount of cash outflow used for shares repurchased during november 2007 , in millions?

Answer: 20.7

the october 29 to november 25 2007 of total number of shares purchased ( a ) is 431170 ; the october 29 to november 25 2007 of average pricepaid per share is $ 48.11 ; the october 29 to november 25 2007 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 431170 ; the october 29 to november 25 2007 of maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) is 4473654 ;

The november 26 to december 31 2007 of total number of shares purchased ( a ) is 8310 ( c ) ; The november 26 to december 31 2007 of average pricepaid per share is $ 44.99 ; The november 26 to december 31 2007 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 8310 ; The november 26 to december 31 2007 of maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) is 4465344 ;

The total of total number of shares purchased ( a ) is 1144772 ; The total of average pricepaid per share is $ 51.42 ; The total of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 1144772 ; The total of maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) is ;

the november 26 to december 31 2007 of total number of shares purchased ( a ) is 8310 ( c ) ; the november 26 to december 31 2007 of average pricepaid per share is $ 44.99 ; the november 26 to december 31 2007 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 8310 ; the november 26 to december 31 2007 of maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) is 4465344 ;

the total of total number of shares purchased ( a ) is 1144772 ; the total of average pricepaid per share is $ 51.42 ; the total of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 1144772 ; the total of maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) is ;

Answer: 20.7

Question: what is the total amount of cash outflow used for shares repurchased during october 2007 , in millions?

Answer: 37.8

the october 1 to october 28 2007 of total number of shares purchased ( a ) is 705292 ; the october 1 to october 28 2007 of average pricepaid per share is $ 53.53 ; the october 1 to october 28 2007 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 705292 ; the october 1 to october 28 2007 of maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) is 4904824 ;

The october 29 to november 25 2007 of total number of shares purchased ( a ) is 431170 ; The october 29 to november 25 2007 of average pricepaid per share is $ 48.11 ; The october 29 to november 25 2007 of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs is 431170 ; The october 29 to november 25 2007 of maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) is 4473654 ;

Answer: 37.8