Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2021?
Reference time interval: 2021-01-01 00:00:00 to 2022-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 17%.

Question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2021?

Answer: 18%

millions the 2019 of operatingleases is $ 419 ; the 2019 of capitalleases is $ 148 ;

millions the 2021 of operatingleases is 303 ; the 2021 of capitalleases is 159 ;

millions the total minimum lease payments of operatingleases is $ 2646 ; the total minimum lease payments of capitalleases is $ 898 ;

Answer: 18%

Question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2020?

Answer: 17%

millions the 2020 of operatingleases is 378 ; the 2020 of capitalleases is 155 ;

Answer: 17%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate from 2004 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 51.2%.

Rejected response: -12.3%.

ABMD || what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 51.2%

the risk-free interest rate of 2003 is 2.92% ( 2.92 % ) ; the risk-free interest rate of 2004 is 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) ; the risk-free interest rate of 2005 is 3.87% ( 3.87 % ) ;

in april 2005 , the the fair value per share of the options granted during fiscal 2003 , 2004 and 2005 was computed as $ 1.69 , $ 1.53 and $ 3.94 , per share , respectively , and was calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions. .

2005 annual report : financials page 15 notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 march 31 , 2005 in addition to compensation expense related to stock option grants , the pro forma compensation expense shown in the table above includes compensation expense related to stock issued under the company 2019s employee stock purchase plan of approximately $ 44000 , $ 19000 and $ 28000 for fiscal 2003 , 2004 and 2005 , respectively .

Answer: 51.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: -12.3%

in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no .

Answer: -12.3%

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was change in millions of free cash flow from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 282.

Rejected response: -29.

UNP || what was change in millions of free cash flow <TIME>?

Question: what was change in millions of free cash flow from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 282

millions of dollars the free cash flow of 2007 is $ 487 ; the free cash flow of 2006 is $ 516 ; the free cash flow of 2005 is $ 234 ;

the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions of dollars 2007 2006 2005 .

2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled a record $ 3.3 billion , yielding free cash flow of $ 487 million in 2007 .

millions of dollars the cash provided by operating activities of 2007 is $ 3277 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2006 is $ 2880 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2005 is $ 2595 ;

millions of dollars the cash used in investing activities of 2007 is -2426 ( 2426 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2006 is -2042 ( 2042 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2005 is -2047 ( 2047 ) ;

Answer: 282

Question: what was change in millions of free cash flow from 2005 to 2007?

Answer: -29

Answer: -29


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 are due in 2002?
Reference time interval: 2001-12-31 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12%.

Rejected response: 8%.

AES || what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt <TIME> are due <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 are due in 2002?

Answer: 12%

future maturities of debt 2014scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 , are ( in millions ) : .

as of december 31 , 2001 , $ 496 million was available .

Answer: 12%

Question: what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 are due in 2005?

Answer: 8%

2002 the thereafter of $ 2672 is 12806 ;

Answer: 8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6%.

Rejected response: 7%.

IP || brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers <TIME>?

Question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2005?

Answer: 6%

in millions the sales of 2006 is $ 6930 ; the sales of 2005 is $ 7170 ; the sales of 2004 is $ 7135 ;

brazil ian paper net sales for 2006 of $ 496 mil- lion were higher than the $ 465 million in 2005 and the $ 417 million in 2004 .

printing papers in millions 2006 2005 2004 .

in millions the operating profit of 2006 is $ 677 ; the operating profit of 2005 is $ 473 ; the operating profit of 2004 is $ 508 ;

Answer: 6%

Question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2006?

Answer: 7%

Answer: 7%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 28%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses <TIME>?' is 28%.

Rejected response: From 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses <TIME>?' is 28%.

C || what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses <TIME>?

what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2009?

Question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2009?

Answer: 28%

Explanation: looking to see if the cost are outweighed by the payment stream prior to other write offs .

in millions of dollars the net interest revenue of 2009 is $ 3173 ; the net interest revenue of 2008 is $ 3332 ; the net interest revenue of 2007 is $ 2723 ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 5 ) % ( % ) ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is 22% ( 22 % ) ;

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2009 is $ 896 ; the total operating expenses of 2008 is $ 988 ; the total operating expenses of 2007 is $ 1070 ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 9 ) % ( % ) ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is ( 8 ) % ( % ) ;

operating expenses decreased 8% ( 8 % ) , mainly driven by lower compensation and transaction expenses .

in millions of dollars the revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ -3682 ( 3682 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -39574 ( 39574 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -17896 ( 17896 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is 91% ( 91 % ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is nm ;

Answer: 28%

Answer: 28%

Rejected interval is a real interval from the same grouped question and does not overlap with the chosen interval.

Statement preference uses non-overlapping intervals only.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations between 2008 and 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -14%.

Rejected response: -50%.

BLL || what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: -14%

( $ in millions ) the net sales of 2010 is $ 318.5 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 634.9 ; the net sales of 2008 is $ 735.4 ;

( $ in millions ) The discontinued operations net of tax of 2010 is $ -74.9 ( 74.9 ) ; The discontinued operations net of tax of 2009 is $ -2.2 ( 2.2 ) ; The discontinued operations net of tax of 2008 is $ 4.6 ;

( $ in millions ) the earnings from operations of 2010 is $ 3.5 ; the earnings from operations of 2009 is $ 19.6 ; the earnings from operations of 2008 is $ 18.2 ;

( $ in millions ) the discontinued operations net of tax of 2010 is $ -74.9 ( 74.9 ) ; the discontinued operations net of tax of 2009 is $ -2.2 ( 2.2 ) ; the discontinued operations net of tax of 2008 is $ 4.6 ;

Answer: -14%

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations between 2009 and 2010?

Answer: -50%

Answer: -50%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2004?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1574.

Rejected response: -364.

AMT || what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2004?

Answer: -1574

the employee separations of liability as of january 1 2004 is $ 2239 ; the employee separations of 2004 expense is $ 823 ; the employee separations of 2004 cash payments is $ -2397 ( 2397 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 665 ; the employee separations of 2005 expense is $ 84 ; the employee separations of 2005 cash payments is $ -448 ( 448 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 301 ; the employee separations of 2006 expense is $ -267 ( 267 ) ; the employee separations of 2006 cash payments is $ -34 ( 34 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2006 is $ 0 ;

the accrued restructuring liability is reflected in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2005 .

restructuring expense 2014the following table displays activity with respect to the accrued restructuring liability for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 ( in thousands ) : liability as of january 1 , expense payments liability december 31 , expense payments liability december 31 , expense payments liability december 31 .

the total of liability as of january 1 2004 is $ 3689 ; the total of 2004 expense is $ 692 ; the total of 2004 cash payments is $ -3285 ( 3285 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 1096 ; the total of 2005 expense is $ 96 ; the total of 2005 cash payments is $ -773 ( 773 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 419 ; the total of 2006 expense is $ -277 ( 277 ) ; the total of 2006 cash payments is $ -142 ( 142 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2006 is $ 0 ;

Answer: -1574

Question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2005?

Answer: -364

Answer: -364


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 79437.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?' is 79437.

Rejected response: From 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?' is 79437.

AMT || what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?

what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2016?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2016?

Answer: 79437

the balance at january 1 of 2016 is $ 28114 ; the balance at january 1 of 2015 is $ 31947 ; the balance at january 1 of 2014 is $ 32545 ;

the balance at december 31 of 2016 is $ 107551 ; the balance at december 31 of 2015 is $ 28114 ; the balance at december 31 of 2014 is $ 31947 ;

during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the statute of limitations on certain unrecognized tax benefits lapsed and certain positions were effectively settled , which resulted in a decrease of $ 3.2 million , $ 3.5 million and $ 5.3 million , respectively , in the liability for uncertain tax benefits , all of which reduced the income tax provision .

the foreign currency of 2016 is -307 ( 307 ) ; the foreign currency of 2015 is -5371 ( 5371 ) ; the foreign currency of 2014 is -3216 ( 3216 ) ;

Answer: 79437

Answer: 79437


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 33%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures <TIME>?' is 33%.

Rejected response: From 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures <TIME>?' is 33%.

CMCSA || what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures <TIME>?

what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2014?

Question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2014?

Answer: 33%

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the cable distribution system of 2015 is $ 2424 ; the cable distribution system of 2014 is $ 2047 ; the cable distribution system of 2013 is $ 1819 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the other equipment of 2015 is 756 ; the other equipment of 2014 is 613 ; the other equipment of 2013 is 527 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total of 2015 is $ 7034 ; the total of 2014 is $ 6154 ; the total of 2013 is $ 5403 ;

the table below summarizes the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable communications segment in 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .

Answer: 33%

Answer: 33%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -71.

Rejected response: 18.

AON || what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2007?

Answer: -71

balance at january 1 2005 the expensed in 2007 of $ 2014 is 38 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the cash payments in 2007 of $ 2014 is -110 ( 110 ) ;

balance at january 1 2005 the foreign currency revaluation of $ 2014 is 1 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2005 of $ 2014 is 116 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2007 of $ 2014 is $ 63 ;

Answer: -71

Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2006?

Answer: 18

balance at january 1 2005 the expensed in 2006 of $ 2014 is 155 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the cash payments in 2006 of $ 2014 is -141 ( 141 ) ;

balance at january 1 2005 the foreign currency revaluation of $ 2014 is 4 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2006 of $ 2014 is 134 ;

Answer: 18


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 77.1.

Rejected response: 75.00.

AWK || at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock <TIME>?

Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2017?

Answer: 77.1

the company repurchased 0.6 million shares and 0.7 million shares of common stock in the open market at an aggregate cost of $ 45 million and $ 54 million under this program for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .

anti-dilutive stock repurchase program in february 2015 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized an anti-dilutive stock repurchase program , which allowed the company to purchase up to 10 million shares of its outstanding common stock over an unrestricted period of time .

as of december 31 , 2018 , there were 5.5 million shares of common stock available for purchase under the program. .

Answer: 77.1

Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2018?

Answer: 75.00

Answer: 75.00


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the growth rate in total sales <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -1.6%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in total sales <TIME>?' is -1.6%.

Rejected response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in total sales <TIME>?' is -1.6%.

MRK || what is the growth rate in total sales <TIME>?

what is the growth rate in total sales in 2012?

Question: what is the growth rate in total sales in 2012?

Answer: -1.6%

( $ in millions ) the total sales of 2013 is $ 44033 ; the total sales of 2012 is $ 47267 ; the total sales of 2011 is $ 48047 ;

product sales sales of the company 2019s top pharmaceutical products , as well as total sales of animal health and consumer care products , were as follows: .

on october 1 , 2013 , the company divested a substantial portion of its third-party manufacturing sales .

( $ in millions ) the nasonex of 2013 is 1335 ; the nasonex of 2012 is 1268 ; the nasonex of 2011 is 1286 ;

Answer: -1.6%

Answer: -1.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations between 2009 and 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -8%.

Rejected response: -11%.

BLL || what was the percentage change in cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations between 2009 and 2010?

Answer: -8%

( $ in millions ) the cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations of 2010 is $ 515.2 ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations of 2009 is $ 559.7 ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations of 2008 is $ 627.6 ;

( $ in millions ) The cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2010 is -110.2 ( 110.2 ) ; The cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2009 is -581.4 ( 581.4 ) ; The cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2008 is -418.0 ( 418.0 ) ;

( $ in millions ) The cash flows provided by ( used in ) financing activities of 2010 is -459.6 ( 459.6 ) ; The cash flows provided by ( used in ) financing activities of 2009 is 100.8 ; The cash flows provided by ( used in ) financing activities of 2008 is -205.5 ( 205.5 ) ;

( $ in millions ) the cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2010 is -110.2 ( 110.2 ) ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2009 is -581.4 ( 581.4 ) ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2008 is -418.0 ( 418.0 ) ;

excluding the $ 250 million impact of additional accounts receivable from the change in accounting discussed above , cash flows provided by operations were $ 765.2 million in 2010 compared to $ 559.7 million in 2009 and $ 627.6 million in 2008 .

Answer: -8%

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: -11%

Answer: -11%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -37.0%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the return on investment for s&p500 <TIME>?' is -37.0%.

Rejected response: From 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the return on investment for s&p500 <TIME>?' is -37.0%.

L || what is the return on investment for s&p500 <TIME>?

what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2007 to 2008?

Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -37.0%

the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2004 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2009 .

the loews common stock of 2004 is 100.00 ; the loews common stock of 2005 is 135.92 ; the loews common stock of 2006 is 179.47 ; the loews common stock of 2007 is 219.01 ; the loews common stock of 2008 is 123.70 ; the loews common stock of 2009 is 160.62 ;

the loews peer group ( a ) of 2004 is 100.00 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2005 is 133.59 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2006 is 152.24 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2007 is 174.46 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2008 is 106.30 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2009 is 136.35 ;

Answer: -37.0%

Answer: -37.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenue in 2015 was net interest income?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 27%.

Rejected response: 46%.

JPM || what percentage of total net revenue <TIME> was net interest income?

Question: what percentage of total net revenue in 2015 was net interest income?

Answer: 27%

( in millions ) the net interest income of 2015 is 43510 ; the net interest income of 2014 is 43634 ; the net interest income of 2013 is 43319 ;

( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2015 is $ 93543 ; the total net revenue of 2014 is $ 95112 ; the total net revenue of 2013 is $ 97367 ;

2014 compared with 2013 total net revenue for 2014 was down by 2% ( 2 % ) compared with the prior year , predominantly due to lower mortgage fees and related income and lower other income .

( a ) included operating lease income of $ 2.1 billion , $ 1.7 billion and $ 1.5 billion for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .

Answer: 27%

Question: what percentage of total net revenue in 2014 was net interest income?

Answer: 46%

Answer: 46%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -71.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities <TIME>?' is -71.

Rejected response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities <TIME>?' is -71.

Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2007?

Answer: -71

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2005 of $ 2014 is 116 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the expensed in 2007 of $ 2014 is 38 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2007 of $ 2014 is $ 63 ;

Answer: -71

Answer: -71


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between <TIME> to <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 16.5%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between <TIME> to <TIME>?' is 16.5%.

Rejected response: From 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between <TIME> to <TIME>?' is 16.5%.

ABMD || what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between <TIME> to <TIME>?

what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2005 to 2006?

Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 16.5%

the weighted average grant-date fair value for options granted during fiscal years 2005 , 2006 , and 2007 was $ 8.05 , $ 6.91 , and $ 8.75 per share , respectively .

the fair value of options granted during the fiscal years 2005 , 2006 and 2007 were calculated using the following weighted average assumptions: .

the calculation of the fair value of the options is net of estimated forfeitures .

the remaining unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for unvested stock option awards at march 31 , 2007 was approximately $ 9.0 million , net of forfeitures , and the weighted average time over which this cost will be recognized is 1.9 years .

Answer: 16.5%

Answer: 16.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11.8%.

Rejected response: 8.5%.

MO || what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 11.8%

( in millions ) the net earnings attributable to altria group inc . of for the years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 5070 ; the net earnings attributable to altria group inc . of for the years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 4535 ; the net earnings attributable to altria group inc . of for the years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 4180 ;

net earnings attributable to altria group , inc .

( in millions ) the earnings for basic and diluted eps of for the years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 5058 ; the earnings for basic and diluted eps of for the years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 4523 ; the earnings for basic and diluted eps of for the years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 4167 ;

Answer: 11.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 8.5%

Answer: 8.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 17%.

CMCSA || scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment <TIME>?

Question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2008?

Answer: 18%

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2008 is 1024 ; the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2007 is 1014 ; the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2006 is 906 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total of 2008 is $ 5545 ; the total of 2007 is $ 5993 ; the total of 2006 is $ 4244 ;

the table below summarizes the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable segment from 2006 through 2008. .

Answer: 18%

Question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2007?

Answer: 17%

Answer: 17%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -37.0%.

Rejected response: 21.5%.

Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -37.0%

the loews common stock of 2004 is 100.00 ; the loews common stock of 2005 is 135.92 ; the loews common stock of 2006 is 179.47 ; the loews common stock of 2007 is 219.01 ; the loews common stock of 2008 is 123.70 ; the loews common stock of 2009 is 160.62 ;

the loews peer group ( a ) of 2004 is 100.00 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2005 is 133.59 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2006 is 152.24 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2007 is 174.46 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2008 is 106.30 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2009 is 136.35 ;

Answer: -37.0%

Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2004 to 2006?

Answer: 21.5%

subtract(121.48, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

Answer: 21.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations between 2008 and 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -11%.

Rejected response: -8%.

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: -11%

( $ in millions ) the cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations of 2010 is $ 515.2 ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations of 2009 is $ 559.7 ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations of 2008 is $ 627.6 ;

( $ in millions ) the cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2010 is -110.2 ( 110.2 ) ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2009 is -581.4 ( 581.4 ) ; the cash flows provided by ( used in ) investing activities including discontinued operations of 2008 is -418.0 ( 418.0 ) ;

excluding the $ 250 million impact of additional accounts receivable from the change in accounting discussed above , cash flows provided by operations were $ 765.2 million in 2010 compared to $ 559.7 million in 2009 and $ 627.6 million in 2008 .

Answer: -11%

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows provided by ( used in ) operating activities including discontinued operations between 2009 and 2010?

Answer: -8%

Answer: -8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2004?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 69.0%.

Rejected response: 63.0%.

ETR || what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool <TIME>?

Question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2004?

Answer: 69.0%

system energy's receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

money pool activity used $ 42.5 million of system energy's operating cash flows in 2004 , used $ 12.0 million in 2003 , and provided $ 6.8 million in 2002 .

management's financial discussion and analysis operating activities cash flow from operations increased by $ 232.1 million in 2004 primarily due to income tax refunds of $ 70.6 million in 2004 compared to income tax payments of $ 230.9 million in 2003 .

Answer: 69.0%

Question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2003?

Answer: 63.0%

Answer: 63.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in total sales in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1.6%.

Rejected response: -6.8%.

Question: what is the growth rate in total sales in 2012?

Answer: -1.6%

product sales sales of the company 2019s top pharmaceutical products , as well as total sales of animal health and consumer care products , were as follows: .

( $ in millions ) the total sales of 2013 is $ 44033 ; the total sales of 2012 is $ 47267 ; the total sales of 2011 is $ 48047 ;

( $ in millions ) the nasonex of 2013 is 1335 ; the nasonex of 2012 is 1268 ; the nasonex of 2011 is 1286 ;

Answer: -1.6%

Question: what is the growth rate in total sales in 2013?

Answer: -6.8%

( $ in millions ) the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2013 is 1306 ; the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2012 is 1273 ; the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2011 is 1202 ;

Answer: -6.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the 2005 tax expense?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: $ 129.60.

Rejected response: $ 240.41.

AAPL || what was the <TIME> tax expense?

Question: what was the 2005 tax expense?

Answer: $ 129.60

the provision for income taxes of 2006 is $ 829 ; the provision for income taxes of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 480 ; the provision for income taxes of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 104 ;

the effective tax rate of 2006 is 29% ( 29 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is 27% ( 27 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is 28% ( 28 % ) ;

The computed expected tax of 2006 is $ 987 ; The computed expected tax of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 633 ; The computed expected tax of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 129 ;

the computed expected tax of 2006 is $ 987 ; the computed expected tax of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 633 ; the computed expected tax of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 129 ;

Answer: $ 129.60

Question: what was the 2006 tax expense?

Answer: $ 240.41

Answer: $ 240.41


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 51%.

Rejected response: 251%.

C || what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 51%

in millions of dollars the non-interest revenue of 2008 is 438 ; the non-interest revenue of 2007 is -291 ( 291 ) ; the non-interest revenue of 2006 is -599 ( 599 ) ;

in millions of dollars The net interest revenue of 2008 is $ -1288 ( 1288 ) ; The net interest revenue of 2007 is $ -461 ( 461 ) ; The net interest revenue of 2006 is $ -345 ( 345 ) ;

in millions of dollars the net interest revenue of 2008 is $ -1288 ( 1288 ) ; the net interest revenue of 2007 is $ -461 ( 461 ) ; the net interest revenue of 2006 is $ -345 ( 345 ) ;

in millions of dollars the revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -850 ( 850 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -752 ( 752 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2006 is $ -944 ( 944 ) ;

Answer: 51%

Question: what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 251%

Answer: 251%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2012 compare to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6.4%.

Rejected response: 10.8%.

CE || what is the growth rate in dividends received <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2012 compare to 2011?

Answer: 6.4%

in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we received cash dividends of $ 92 million , $ 83 million and $ 78 million , respectively .

similar expansions since the ventures were formed have led to earnings growth and increased dividends for the company .

cigarette consumption in china is expected to grow at a rate of 1.9% ( 1.9 % ) per year from 2012 through 2017 .

although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) .

we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants .

Answer: 6.4%

Question: what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2013 compare to 2012?

Answer: 10.8%

Answer: 10.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3833.

Rejected response: 79437.

Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2015?

Answer: -3833

the balance at january 1 of 2016 is $ 28114 ; the balance at january 1 of 2015 is $ 31947 ; the balance at january 1 of 2014 is $ 32545 ;

the foreign currency of 2016 is -307 ( 307 ) ; the foreign currency of 2015 is -5371 ( 5371 ) ; the foreign currency of 2014 is -3216 ( 3216 ) ;

the balance at december 31 of 2016 is $ 107551 ; the balance at december 31 of 2015 is $ 28114 ; the balance at december 31 of 2014 is $ 31947 ;

Answer: -3833

Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2016?

Answer: 79437

Answer: 79437


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense <TIME> compare to <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -29.9%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense <TIME> compare to <TIME>?' is -29.9%.

Rejected response: From 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2003-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense <TIME> compare to <TIME>?' is -29.9%.

D || what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2001 compare to 2000?

Question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2001 compare to 2000?

Answer: -29.9%

rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense was $ 84 million , $ 75 million and $ 107 million for 2002 , 2001 , and 2000 , respectively .

substantially all of the value was attributed to the power pur- chase contracts which were terminated and resulted in a charge included in operation and maintenance expense .

capacity and other purchases under these contracts totaled $ 691 million , $ 680 million and $ 740 million for 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .

the table below reflects dominion 2019s minimum commitments as of december 31 , 2002 under these contracts. .

estimated payments under these commitments for the next five years are as follows : 2003 2014$ 599 million ; 2004 2014$ 311 million ; 2005 2014$ 253 million ; 2006 2014$ 205 mil- lion ; 2007 2014$ 89 million ; and years beyond 2007 2014$ 215 mil- lion .

Answer: -29.9%

Answer: -29.9%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what was the <TIME> tax expense?
Fixed answer: $ 240.41.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the <TIME> tax expense?' is $ 240.41.

Rejected response: From 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the <TIME> tax expense?' is $ 240.41.

Question: what was the 2006 tax expense?

Answer: $ 240.41

the computed expected tax of 2006 is $ 987 ; the computed expected tax of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 633 ; the computed expected tax of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 129 ;

the provision for income taxes of 2006 is $ 829 ; the provision for income taxes of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 480 ; the provision for income taxes of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 104 ;

the effective tax rate of 2006 is 29% ( 29 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is 27% ( 27 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is 28% ( 28 % ) ;

Answer: $ 240.41

Answer: $ 240.41


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: at december 31 , 2006 , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-12-31 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6%.

Rejected response: 20%.

IP || <TIME> , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due <TIME>?

Question: at december 31 , 2006 , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due in 2007?

Answer: 6%

in millions the lease obligations ( a ) of 2007 is $ 144 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2008 is $ 117 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2009 is $ 94 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2010 is $ 74 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2011 is $ 60 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of thereafter is $ 110 ;

in millions the total of 2007 is $ 2473 ; the total of 2008 is $ 579 ; the total of 2009 is $ 456 ; the total of 2010 is $ 426 ; the total of 2011 is $ 383 ; the total of thereafter is $ 1904 ;

at december 31 , 2006 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations were as follows : in millions 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter .

in millions the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2007 is 2329 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2008 is 462 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2009 is 362 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2010 is 352 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2011 is 323 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of thereafter is 1794 ;

Answer: 6%

Question: at december 31 , 2006 , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due in 2008?

Answer: 20%

Answer: 20%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , <TIME> are due <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 15%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , <TIME> are due <TIME>?' is 15%.

Rejected response: From 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , <TIME> are due <TIME>?' is 15%.

UPS || what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , <TIME> are due <TIME>?

what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2013?

Question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2013?

Answer: 15%

commitment type the total of 2011 is $ 2944 ; the total of 2012 is $ 1334 ; the total of 2013 is $ 3515 ; the total of 2014 is $ 2059 ; the total of 2015 is $ 820 ; the total of after 2016 is $ 12884 ; the total of total is $ 23556 ;

the following table summarizes the expected cash outflow to satisfy our contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 ( in millions ) : .

contractual commitments we have contractual obligations and commitments in the form of capital leases , operating leases , debt obligations , purchase commitments , and certain other liabilities .

commitment type the debt principal of 2011 is 345 ; the debt principal of 2012 is 2014 ; the debt principal of 2013 is 1750 ; the debt principal of 2014 is 1000 ; the debt principal of 2015 is 100 ; the debt principal of after 2016 is 7363 ; the debt principal of total is 10558 ;

the table above does not include approximately $ 284 million of liabilities for .

Answer: 15%

Answer: 15%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: <TIME> what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?
Fixed answer: 13%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question '<TIME> what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?' is 13%.

Rejected response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question '<TIME> what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?' is 13%.

IP || <TIME> what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

in 2005 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

Question: in 2005 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

Answer: 13%

in millions the consumer packaging of 2006 is 116 ; the consumer packaging of 2005 is 126 ; the consumer packaging of 2004 is 198 ;

in millions the total from continuing operations of 2006 is $ 1009 ; the total from continuing operations of 2005 is $ 992 ; the total from continuing operations of 2004 is $ 925 ;

the following table presents capital spending from continuing operations by each of our business segments for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .

capital spending from continuing operations was $ 1.0 billion in 2006 , or 87% ( 87 % ) of depreciation and amortization , comparable to $ 992 million , or 78% ( 78 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2005 , and $ 925 mil- lion , or 73% ( 73 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2004 .

Answer: 13%

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2015 was the gfs segment?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 36%.

Rejected response: 46%.

FIS || what percent of total consolidated revenues <TIME> was the gfs segment?

Question: what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2015 was the gfs segment?

Answer: 36%

the gfs of 2016 is 4250 ; the gfs of 2015 is 2360 ; the gfs of 2014 is 2198 ;

the total consolidated revenues of 2016 is $ 9241 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2015 is $ 6596 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2014 is $ 6413 ;

revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : .

Answer: 36%

Question: what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2016 was the gfs segment?

Answer: 46%

Answer: 46%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2009 trading assets , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 257839.

Rejected response: 305261.

JPM || excluding derivatives , what are net <TIME> trading assets , in millions?

Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2009 trading assets , in millions?

Answer: 257839

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2009 is $ 318063 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2008 is $ 384102 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2007 is $ 381415 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2009 is $ 60224 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2008 is $ 78841 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2007 is $ 94737 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) The trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2009 is 110457 ; The trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2008 is 121417 ; The trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2007 is 65439 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2009 is 110457 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2008 is 121417 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2007 is 65439 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2009 is 77901 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2008 is 93200 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2007 is 65198 ;

Answer: 257839

Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2008 trading assets , in millions?

Answer: 305261

Answer: 305261


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 69.0%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool <TIME>?' is 69.0%.

Rejected response: From 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool <TIME>?' is 69.0%.

Question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2004?

Answer: 69.0%

management's financial discussion and analysis operating activities cash flow from operations increased by $ 232.1 million in 2004 primarily due to income tax refunds of $ 70.6 million in 2004 compared to income tax payments of $ 230.9 million in 2003 .

money pool activity used $ 42.5 million of system energy's operating cash flows in 2004 , used $ 12.0 million in 2003 , and provided $ 6.8 million in 2002 .

Answer: 69.0%

Answer: 69.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7%.

Rejected response: 6%.

IP || brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers <TIME>?

Question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2006?

Answer: 7%

in millions the sales of 2006 is $ 6930 ; the sales of 2005 is $ 7170 ; the sales of 2004 is $ 7135 ;

in millions the operating profit of 2006 is $ 677 ; the operating profit of 2005 is $ 473 ; the operating profit of 2004 is $ 508 ;

brazil ian paper net sales for 2006 of $ 496 mil- lion were higher than the $ 465 million in 2005 and the $ 417 million in 2004 .

Answer: 7%

Question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2005?

Answer: 6%

Answer: 6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 46%.

Rejected response: 45%.

JPM || what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2014?

Answer: 46%

( in millions ) the net interest income of 2014 is 43634 ; the net interest income of 2013 is 43319 ; the net interest income of 2012 is 44910 ;

( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2014 is $ 94205 ; the total net revenue of 2013 is $ 96606 ; the total net revenue of 2012 is $ 97031 ;

2014 compared with 2013 total net revenue for 2014 was down by $ 2.4 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared with the prior year , predominantly due to lower mortgage fees and related income , and lower other income .

Answer: 46%

Question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2013?

Answer: 45%

Answer: 45%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of <TIME> to the end of <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -35.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of <TIME> to the end of <TIME>?' is -35.

Rejected response: From 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of <TIME> to the end of <TIME>?' is -35.

CMCSA || what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of <TIME> to the end of <TIME>?

what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2014 to the end of 2015?

Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2014 to the end of 2015?

Answer: -35

( in millions ) the balance december 31 of 2015 is $ 1136 ; the balance december 31 of 2014 is $ 1171 ; the balance december 31 of 2013 is $ 1701 ;

reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits .

uncertain tax positions our uncertain tax positions as of december 31 , 2015 totaled $ 1.1 billion , which exclude the federal benefits on state tax positions that were recorded as deferred income taxes .

( in millions ) the balance january 1 of 2015 is $ 1171 ; the balance january 1 of 2014 is $ 1701 ; the balance january 1 of 2013 is $ 1573 ;

( in millions ) the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2015 is -84 ( 84 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2014 is -220 ( 220 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2013 is -141 ( 141 ) ;

Answer: -35

Answer: -35


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2013 compare to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10.8%.

Rejected response: 6.4%.

Question: what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2013 compare to 2012?

Answer: 10.8%

in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we received cash dividends of $ 92 million , $ 83 million and $ 78 million , respectively .

although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) .

we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants .

Answer: 10.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2012 compare to 2011?

Answer: 6.4%

Answer: 6.4%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue <TIME> was do to interest rate risks?
Fixed answer: 54%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total principal transactions revenue <TIME> was do to interest rate risks?' is 54%.

Rejected response: From 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total principal transactions revenue <TIME> was do to interest rate risks?' is 54%.

C || what percentage of total principal transactions revenue <TIME> was do to interest rate risks?

what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2016 was do to interest rate risks?

Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2016 was do to interest rate risks?

Answer: 54%

in millions of dollars the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2018 is $ 5186 ; the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2017 is $ 5301 ; the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2016 is $ 4229 ;

in millions of dollars the total of 2018 is $ 9062 ; the total of 2017 is $ 9475 ; the total of 2016 is $ 7857 ;

the following table presents principal transactions revenue: .

( 5 ) includes revenues from structured credit products. .

Answer: 54%

Answer: 54%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the net income per common share <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 1.56.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net income per common share <TIME>?' is 1.56.

Rejected response: From 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net income per common share <TIME>?' is 1.56.

DRE || what is the net income per common share <TIME>?

what is the net income per common share in 2007?

Question: what is the net income per common share in 2007?

Answer: 1.56

the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2008 is $ 56616 ; the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2007 is $ 217692 ; the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2006 is $ 145095 ;

the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2008 is 146915 ; the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2007 is 139255 ; the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2006 is 134883 ;

unbilled receivables on construction contracts totaled $ 22.7 million and $ 33.1 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

the specific timing of the sale is measured against various criteria in sfas 66 related to the terms of the transactions and any continuing involvement in the form of management or financial assistance from the seller associated with the properties .

the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2008 is $ 59584 ; the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2007 is $ 232091 ; the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2006 is $ 159333 ;

Answer: 1.56

Answer: 1.56


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2016 was the gfs segment?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 46%.

Rejected response: 36%.

Question: what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2016 was the gfs segment?

Answer: 46%

revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : .

the gfs of 2016 is 4250 ; the gfs of 2015 is 2360 ; the gfs of 2014 is 2198 ;

the total consolidated revenues of 2016 is $ 9241 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2015 is $ 6596 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2014 is $ 6413 ;

Answer: 46%

Question: what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2015 was the gfs segment?

Answer: 36%

Answer: 36%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total route miles are main line in 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 53%.

Rejected response: 52%.

UNP || what percent of total route miles are main line <TIME>?

Question: what percent of total route miles are main line in 2006?

Answer: 53%

the main line of 2006 is 27318 ; the main line of 2005 is 27301 ;

the total of 2006 is 51596 ; the total of 2005 is 52667 ;

track 2013 the railroad operates on 32339 main line and branch line route miles in 23 states in the western two-thirds of the united states .

the branch line of 2006 is 5021 ; the branch line of 2005 is 5125 ;

Answer: 53%

Question: what percent of total route miles are main line in 2005?

Answer: 52%

Answer: 52%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2016 was do to interest rate risks?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 54%.

Rejected response: 57%.

Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2016 was do to interest rate risks?

Answer: 54%

in millions of dollars the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2018 is $ 5186 ; the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2017 is $ 5301 ; the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2016 is $ 4229 ;

in millions of dollars the total of 2018 is $ 9062 ; the total of 2017 is $ 9475 ; the total of 2016 is $ 7857 ;

( 5 ) includes revenues from structured credit products. .

Answer: 54%

Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2018 was do to interest rate risks?

Answer: 57%

Answer: 57%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 36%.

Rejected response: 64%.

PKG || what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2007?

Answer: 36%

total purchase commitments over the next two years are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

Answer: 36%

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2006?

Answer: 64%

commitments and contingencies ( continued ) purchase commitments the company has entered into various purchase agreements to buy minimum amounts of energy over periods ranging from one to two years at fixed prices .

Answer: 64%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2015 compare to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 33.

Rejected response: -41.

CE || what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2015 compare to 2014?

Answer: 33

research and development expense was $ 78 million , $ 119 million and $ 86 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives .

research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications .

Answer: 33

Question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2016 compare to 2015?

Answer: -41

Answer: -41


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 8.5%.

Rejected response: 11.8%.

MO || what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 8.5%

( in millions ) the net earnings attributable to altria group inc . of for the years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 5070 ; the net earnings attributable to altria group inc . of for the years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 4535 ; the net earnings attributable to altria group inc . of for the years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 4180 ;

( in millions ) the earnings for basic and diluted eps of for the years ended december 31 , 2014 is $ 5058 ; the earnings for basic and diluted eps of for the years ended december 31 , 2013 is $ 4523 ; the earnings for basic and diluted eps of for the years ended december 31 , 2012 is $ 4167 ;

net earnings attributable to altria group , inc .

Answer: 8.5%

Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 11.8%

Answer: 11.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 79437.

Rejected response: -3833.

AMT || what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2016?

Answer: 79437

the balance at january 1 of 2016 is $ 28114 ; the balance at january 1 of 2015 is $ 31947 ; the balance at january 1 of 2014 is $ 32545 ;

the foreign currency of 2016 is -307 ( 307 ) ; the foreign currency of 2015 is -5371 ( 5371 ) ; the foreign currency of 2014 is -3216 ( 3216 ) ;

the balance at december 31 of 2016 is $ 107551 ; the balance at december 31 of 2015 is $ 28114 ; the balance at december 31 of 2014 is $ 31947 ;

Answer: 79437

Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2015?

Answer: -3833

Answer: -3833


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 70%.

Rejected response: -3%.

FIS || what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 70%

cash flows from operations cash flows from operations were $ 1925 million , $ 1131 million and $ 1165 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 respectively .

the 2016 increase in cash flows from operations is primarily due to increased net earnings , after the add back of non-cash depreciation and amortization , as a result of sungard operations being included for the full year .

ck ash flows from operations increased $ 794 million in 2016 and decreased $ 34 million in 2015 .

we expect that cash and cash equivalents plus cash flows from operations over the next twelve months will be sufficient to fund our operating cash requirements , capital expenditures and mandatory debt service .

type of obligations the total of total is $ 14429 ; the total of payments due in less than 1 year is $ 1068 ; the total of payments due in 1-3 years is $ 2712 ; the total of payments due in 3-5 years is $ 3264 ; the total of payments due in more than 5 years is $ 7385 ;

Answer: 70%

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -3%

Answer: -3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage rent increase between 2008 and 2009?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5%.

Rejected response: 22%.

IP || what was the percentage rent increase <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage rent increase between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: 5%

rent expense was $ 216 million , $ 205 million and $ 168 million for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

deferred income taxes are not provided for tempo- rary differences of approximately $ 3.5 billion , $ 2.6 billion and $ 3.7 billion as of december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , representing earnings of non-u.s .

additionally in 2009 , as a result of agree- ments on the 2004 and 2005 u.s .

$ 190 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before equity earnings .

excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 423 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before equity earnings .

Answer: 5%

Question: what was the percentage rent increase between 2007 and 2008?

Answer: 22%

the company recorded an income tax provision for 2007 of $ 415 million , including a $ 41 million benefit related to the effective settlement of tax audits , and $ 8 million of other tax benefits .

Answer: 22%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -1.3%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in operating expenses <TIME>?' is -1.3%.

Rejected response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in operating expenses <TIME>?' is -1.3%.

GS || what is the growth rate in operating expenses <TIME>?

what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2014?

Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2014?

Answer: -1.3%

$ in millions the total operating expenses of year ended december 2014 is $ 22171 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2013 is $ 22469 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2012 is $ 22956 ;

management 2019s discussion and analysis operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity .

operating expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 22.17 billion for 2014 , essentially unchanged compared with 2013 .

operating expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 22.47 billion for 2013 , 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2012 .

Answer: -1.3%

Answer: -1.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 due in 2012 are maturities of long-term debt?
Reference time interval: 2009-12-31 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 21%.

Rejected response: 41%.

IP || what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations <TIME> due <TIME> are maturities of long-term debt?

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 due in 2012 are maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 21%

in millions the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2010 is $ 304 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2011 is $ 574 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2012 is $ 199 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2013 is $ 131 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2014 is $ 562 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of thereafter is $ 7263 ;

in millions the total ( d ) of 2010 is $ 3262 ; the total ( d ) of 2011 is $ 1407 ; the total ( d ) of 2012 is $ 946 ; the total ( d ) of 2013 is $ 783 ; the total ( d ) of 2014 is $ 1173 ; the total ( d ) of thereafter is $ 16284 ;

contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 , were as follows : in millions 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 thereafter maturities of long-term debt ( a ) $ 304 $ 574 $ 199 $ 131 $ 562 $ 7263 debt obligations with right of offset ( b ) 519 28 2013 2013 2013 5108 .

Answer: 21%

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 due in 2011 are maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 41%

in millions the lease obligations of 2010 is 177 ; the lease obligations of 2011 is 148 ; the lease obligations of 2012 is 124 ; the lease obligations of 2013 is 96 ; the lease obligations of 2014 is 79 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is 184 ;

Answer: 41%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in total sales in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -6.8%.

Rejected response: -1.6%.

MRK || what is the growth rate in total sales <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in total sales in 2013?

Answer: -6.8%

product sales sales of the company 2019s top pharmaceutical products , as well as total sales of animal health and consumer care products , were as follows: .

( $ in millions ) the total sales of 2013 is $ 44033 ; the total sales of 2012 is $ 47267 ; the total sales of 2011 is $ 48047 ;

( $ in millions ) the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2013 is 1306 ; the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2012 is 1273 ; the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2011 is 1202 ;

Answer: -6.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in total sales in 2012?

Answer: -1.6%

( $ in millions ) the nasonex of 2013 is 1335 ; the nasonex of 2012 is 1268 ; the nasonex of 2011 is 1286 ;

Answer: -1.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: at december 31 , 2006 , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2006-12-31 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 20%.

Rejected response: 6%.

IP || <TIME> , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due <TIME>?

Question: at december 31 , 2006 , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due in 2008?

Answer: 20%

in millions the lease obligations ( a ) of 2007 is $ 144 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2008 is $ 117 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2009 is $ 94 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2010 is $ 74 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of 2011 is $ 60 ; the lease obligations ( a ) of thereafter is $ 110 ;

in millions the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2007 is 2329 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2008 is 462 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2009 is 362 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2010 is 352 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of 2011 is 323 ; the purchase obligations ( bc ) of thereafter is 1794 ;

in millions the total of 2007 is $ 2473 ; the total of 2008 is $ 579 ; the total of 2009 is $ 456 ; the total of 2010 is $ 426 ; the total of 2011 is $ 383 ; the total of thereafter is $ 1904 ;

Answer: 20%

Question: at december 31 , 2006 , what percentage of total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable leases and purchase obligations from lease obligations is due in 2007?

Answer: 6%

Answer: 6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 64%.

Rejected response: 36%.

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2006?

Answer: 64%

total purchase commitments over the next two years are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

Answer: 64%

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2007?

Answer: 36%

Answer: 36%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percent of total contractual obligations <TIME> are made up of long-term debt obligations?
Fixed answer: 97%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total contractual obligations <TIME> are made up of long-term debt obligations?' is 97%.

Rejected response: From 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total contractual obligations <TIME> are made up of long-term debt obligations?' is 97%.

C || what percent of total contractual obligations <TIME> are made up of long-term debt obligations?

what percent of total contractual obligations in 2011 are made up of long-term debt obligations?

Question: what percent of total contractual obligations in 2011 are made up of long-term debt obligations?

Answer: 97%

in millions of dollars at year end the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 47162 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 59656 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 69344 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 28132 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2014 is $ 34895 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 124830 ;

in millions of dollars at year end the total of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 83659 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 61368 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 70718 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 29334 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2014 is $ 36040 ; the total of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 131392 ;

in millions of dollars at year end The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2010 is 1032 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2011 is 446 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2012 is 331 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2013 is 267 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2014 is 258 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year thereafter is 783 ;

( 2 ) relates primarily to accounts payable and accrued expenses included in other liabilities in citi 2019s consolidated balance sheet. .

Answer: 97%

Answer: 97%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 17%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2020-01-01 00:00:00 to 2021-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due <TIME>?' is 17%.

Rejected response: From 2021-01-01 00:00:00 to 2022-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due <TIME>?' is 17%.

UNP || what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due <TIME>?

what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2020?

Question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2020?

Answer: 17%

millions the 2020 of operatingleases is 378 ; the 2020 of capitalleases is 155 ;

millions the total minimum lease payments of operatingleases is $ 2646 ; the total minimum lease payments of capitalleases is $ 898 ;

future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2018 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases .

millions the 2019 of operatingleases is $ 419 ; the 2019 of capitalleases is $ 148 ;

Answer: 17%

Answer: 17%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.30%.

Rejected response: 3.75%.

MRO || what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate <TIME>?

Question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2017?

Answer: 3.30%

the initial health care trend rate of 2017 is 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) ; the initial health care trend rate of 2016 is 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) ; the initial health care trend rate of 2015 is 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) ;

the ultimate trend rate of 2017 is 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ; the ultimate trend rate of 2016 is 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ; the ultimate trend rate of 2015 is 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ;

The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2017 is 2025 ; The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2016 is 2025 ; The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2015 is 2024 ;

Answer: 3.30%

Question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2016?

Answer: 3.75%

Answer: 3.75%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percent of total contractual obligations <TIME> are made up of long-term debt obligations?
Fixed answer: 56%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total contractual obligations <TIME> are made up of long-term debt obligations?' is 56%.

Rejected response: From 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total contractual obligations <TIME> are made up of long-term debt obligations?' is 56%.

what percent of total contractual obligations in 2010 are made up of long-term debt obligations?

Question: what percent of total contractual obligations in 2010 are made up of long-term debt obligations?

Answer: 56%

in millions of dollars at year end the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 47162 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 59656 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 69344 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 28132 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2014 is $ 34895 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 124830 ;

in millions of dollars at year end the total of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 83659 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 61368 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 70718 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 29334 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2014 is $ 36040 ; the total of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 131392 ;

( 2 ) relates primarily to accounts payable and accrued expenses included in other liabilities in citi 2019s consolidated balance sheet. .

Answer: 56%

Answer: 56%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was 2016 gross margin percent?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 16.1%.

CDW || what was <TIME> gross margin percent?

Question: what was 2016 gross margin percent?

Answer: 18%

( dollars in millions ) the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2017 is $ 15191.5 ; the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2016 is $ 13981.9 ; the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2015 is $ 12988.7 ;

( dollars in millions ) the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2017 is 2449.9 ; the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2016 is 2327.2 ; the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2015 is 2115.8 ;

table of contents in this form 10-k , we discuss non-gaap income before income taxes , non-gaap net income , non-gaap net income per diluted share , ebitda , adjusted ebitda and adjusted ebitda margin , which are non-gaap financial measures .

( dollars in millions ) the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2017 is 59.8 ; the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2016 is 55.0 ; the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2015 is 51.1 ;

Answer: 18%

Question: what was 2017 gross margin percent?

Answer: 16.1%

Answer: 16.1%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what was the percentage change in loans retained <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 5%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the percentage change in loans retained <TIME>?' is 5%.

Rejected response: From 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the percentage change in loans retained <TIME>?' is 5%.

JPM || what was the percentage change in loans retained <TIME>?

what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2013 to 2014?

Question: what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 5%

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans retained of december 31 , 2014 is $ 324502 ; the loans retained of december 31 , 2013 is $ 308263 ; the loans retained of 2014 is $ 599 ; the loans retained of 2013 is $ 821 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) The loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2014 is 330914 ; The loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2013 is 321564 ; The loans 2013 reported of 2014 is 624 ; The loans 2013 reported of 2013 is 1044 ;

the firm distributes a significant percentage of the loans it originates into the market as part of its syndicated loan business and to manage portfolio concentrations and credit risk .

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2014 is 3801 ; the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2013 is 11290 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2014 is 4 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2013 is 26 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2014 is 330914 ; the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2013 is 321564 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2014 is 624 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2013 is 1044 ;

Answer: 5%

Answer: 5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.75%.

Rejected response: 3.30%.

Question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2016?

Answer: 3.75%

the initial health care trend rate of 2017 is 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) ; the initial health care trend rate of 2016 is 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) ; the initial health care trend rate of 2015 is 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) ;

the ultimate trend rate of 2017 is 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ; the ultimate trend rate of 2016 is 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ; the ultimate trend rate of 2015 is 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ;

Answer: 3.75%

Question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2017?

Answer: 3.30%

Answer: 3.30%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percentage of total net revenue <TIME> was net interest income?
Fixed answer: 46%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total net revenue <TIME> was net interest income?' is 46%.

Rejected response: From 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total net revenue <TIME> was net interest income?' is 46%.

JPM || what percentage of total net revenue <TIME> was net interest income?

what percentage of total net revenue in 2014 was net interest income?

Question: what percentage of total net revenue in 2014 was net interest income?

Answer: 46%

( in millions ) the net interest income of 2015 is 43510 ; the net interest income of 2014 is 43634 ; the net interest income of 2013 is 43319 ;

( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2015 is $ 93543 ; the total net revenue of 2014 is $ 95112 ; the total net revenue of 2013 is $ 97367 ;

( a ) included operating lease income of $ 2.1 billion , $ 1.7 billion and $ 1.5 billion for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .

Answer: 46%

Answer: 46%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 10.6%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate <TIME>?' is 10.6%.

Rejected response: From 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate <TIME>?' is 10.6%.

ECL || what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate <TIME>?

what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2016?

Question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2016?

Answer: 10.6%

the statutory u.s . rate of 2017 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . rate of 2016 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . rate of 2015 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ;

the effective income tax rate of 2017 is 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) ; the effective income tax rate of 2016 is 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) ; the effective income tax rate of 2015 is 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) ;

federal income tax rate to the company 2019s effective income tax rate is as follows: .

the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2017 is 0.4 ; the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2016 is 0.9 ; the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2015 is 0.4 ;

Answer: 10.6%

Answer: 10.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 251%.

Rejected response: 51%.

C || what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 251%

in millions of dollars the net interest revenue of 2008 is $ -1288 ( 1288 ) ; the net interest revenue of 2007 is $ -461 ( 461 ) ; the net interest revenue of 2006 is $ -345 ( 345 ) ;

in millions of dollars the non-interest revenue of 2008 is 438 ; the non-interest revenue of 2007 is -291 ( 291 ) ; the non-interest revenue of 2006 is -599 ( 599 ) ;

in millions of dollars the revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -850 ( 850 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -752 ( 752 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2006 is $ -944 ( 944 ) ;

Answer: 251%

Question: what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 51%

Answer: 51%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases from july 1 , 2006 to july 2 , 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-07-01 00:00:00 to 2007-07-03 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9%.

Rejected response: 7%.

SYY || what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases from july 1 , 2006 to july 2 , 2007?

Answer: 9%

total rental expense under operating leases was $ 100690000 , $ 92710000 , and $ 86842000 in fiscal 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .

the fair value of total long-term debt approximated $ 1669999000 at july 1 , 2006 and $ 1442721000 at july 2 , 2005 , respectively .

as of july 1 , 2006 and july 2 , 2005 , letters of credit outstanding were $ 60000000 and $ 76817000 , respectively .

Answer: 9%

Question: what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases from july 2 , 2005 to july 1 , 2006?

Answer: 7%

Answer: 7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12.3%.

Rejected response: 10.4%.

ECL || what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 12.3%

( millions ) the december 31 2016 of global industrial is $ 2585.0 ; the december 31 2016 of global institutional is $ 590.7 ; the december 31 2016 of global energy is $ 3093.6 ; the december 31 2016 of other is $ 113.7 ; the december 31 2016 of total is $ 6383.0 ;

( millions ) the december 31 2017 of global industrial is $ 2797.0 ; the december 31 2017 of global institutional is $ 1027.0 ; the december 31 2017 of global energy is $ 3203.7 ; the december 31 2017 of other is $ 139.4 ; the december 31 2017 of total is $ 7167.1 ;

( millions ) The segment change ( a ) of global industrial is 62.7 ; The segment change ( a ) of global institutional is -62.7 ( 62.7 ) ; The segment change ( a ) of global energy is - ; The segment change ( a ) of other is - ; The segment change ( a ) of total is - ;

( millions ) the december 31 2015 of global industrial is $ 2560.8 ; the december 31 2015 of global institutional is $ 662.7 ; the december 31 2015 of global energy is $ 3151.5 ; the december 31 2015 of other is $ 115.8 ; the december 31 2015 of total is $ 6490.8 ;

Answer: 12.3%

Question: what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill from 2015 to 2017?

Answer: 10.4%

Answer: 10.4%