Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2006 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 11%.

Rejected response: 13%.

IP || <TIME> what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

Question: in 2006 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

Answer: 11%

in millions the consumer packaging of 2006 is 116 ; the consumer packaging of 2005 is 126 ; the consumer packaging of 2004 is 198 ;

in millions the total from continuing operations of 2006 is $ 1009 ; the total from continuing operations of 2005 is $ 992 ; the total from continuing operations of 2004 is $ 925 ;

the following table presents capital spending from continuing operations by each of our business segments for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .

capital spending from continuing operations was $ 1.0 billion in 2006 , or 87% ( 87 % ) of depreciation and amortization , comparable to $ 992 million , or 78% ( 78 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2005 , and $ 925 mil- lion , or 73% ( 73 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2004 .

Answer: 11%

Question: in 2005 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

Answer: 13%

Answer: 13%

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share between 2016 and 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12%.

Rejected response: 2%.

GS || what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share between 2016 and 2017?

Answer: 12%

dividends declared per common share were $ 2.90 in 2017 , $ 2.60 in 2016 and $ 2.55 in 2015 .

in millions except per share amounts The common share repurchases of year ended december 2017 is 29.0 ; The common share repurchases of year ended december 2016 is 36.6 ; The common share repurchases of year ended december 2015 is 22.1 ;

( board ) declared a dividend of $ 0.75 per common share to be paid on march 29 , 2018 to common shareholders of record on march 1 , 2018 .

the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program. .

Answer: 12%

Question: what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share between 2015 and 2016?

Answer: 2%

Answer: 2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 42.9%.

Rejected response: -4.1%.

FIS || what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 42.9%

during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , we generated approximately $ 1830 million , $ 1909 million and $ 1336 million , respectively , in revenues denominated in currencies other than the u.s .

a 10% ( 10 % ) move in average exchange rates for these currencies ( assuming a simultaneous and immediate 10% ( 10 % ) change in all of such rates for the relevant period ) would have resulted in the following increase or ( decrease ) in our reported revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in millions ) : .

our exposure to foreign currency exchange risks generally arises from our non-u.s .

dollar during these years compared to the preceding year .

Answer: 42.9%

Question: what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -4.1%

Answer: -4.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment during 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 54.1%.

Rejected response: 56.5%.

MO || what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment <TIME>?

Question: what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment during 2013?

Answer: 54.1%

( cans and packs in millions ) the copenhagen of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2014 is 448.6 ; the copenhagen of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2013 is 426.1 ; the copenhagen of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012 is 392.5 ;

( cans and packs in millions ) the total smokeless products of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2014 is 793.3 ; the total smokeless products of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2013 is 787.5 ; the total smokeless products of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012 is 763.3 ;

smokeless products segment during 2014 , the smokeless products segment grew operating companies income and expanded operating companies income margins .

( cans and packs in millions ) the copenhagenandskoal of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2014 is 718.2 ; the copenhagenandskoal of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2013 is 709.9 ; the copenhagenandskoal of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012 is 680.9 ;

Answer: 54.1%

Question: what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment during 2014?

Answer: 56.5%

Answer: 56.5%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 64%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently <TIME>?' is 64%.

Rejected response: From 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently <TIME>?' is 64%.

PKG || what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently <TIME>?

what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2006?

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2006?

Answer: 64%

total purchase commitments over the next two years are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

commitments and contingencies ( continued ) purchase commitments the company has entered into various purchase agreements to buy minimum amounts of energy over periods ranging from one to two years at fixed prices .

Answer: 64%

Answer: 64%

Rejected interval is a real interval from the same grouped question and does not overlap with the chosen interval.

Statement preference uses non-overlapping intervals only.


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 75.00.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock <TIME>?' is 75.00.

Rejected response: From 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock <TIME>?' is 75.00.

AWK || at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock <TIME>?

at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2018?

Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2018?

Answer: 75.00

the company repurchased 0.6 million shares and 0.7 million shares of common stock in the open market at an aggregate cost of $ 45 million and $ 54 million under this program for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .

as of december 31 , 2018 , there were 5.5 million shares of common stock available for purchase under the program. .

anti-dilutive stock repurchase program in february 2015 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized an anti-dilutive stock repurchase program , which allowed the company to purchase up to 10 million shares of its outstanding common stock over an unrestricted period of time .

Answer: 75.00

Answer: 75.00


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was change in millions of free cash flow from 2005 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -29.

Rejected response: 282.

UNP || what was change in millions of free cash flow <TIME>?

Question: what was change in millions of free cash flow from 2005 to 2007?

Answer: -29

millions of dollars the free cash flow of 2007 is $ 487 ; the free cash flow of 2006 is $ 516 ; the free cash flow of 2005 is $ 234 ;

2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled a record $ 3.3 billion , yielding free cash flow of $ 487 million in 2007 .

the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions of dollars 2007 2006 2005 .

millions of dollars the cash provided by operating activities of 2007 is $ 3277 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2006 is $ 2880 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2005 is $ 2595 ;

millions of dollars the cash used in investing activities of 2007 is -2426 ( 2426 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2006 is -2042 ( 2042 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2005 is -2047 ( 2047 ) ;

Answer: -29

Question: what was change in millions of free cash flow from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 282

Answer: 282


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the growth rate in dividends received <TIME> compare to <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 10.8%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in dividends received <TIME> compare to <TIME>?' is 10.8%.

Rejected response: From 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in dividends received <TIME> compare to <TIME>?' is 10.8%.

CE || what is the growth rate in dividends received <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2013 compare to 2012?

Question: what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2013 compare to 2012?

Answer: 10.8%

in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we received cash dividends of $ 92 million , $ 83 million and $ 78 million , respectively .

similar expansions since the ventures were formed have led to earnings growth and increased dividends for the company .

cigarette consumption in china is expected to grow at a rate of 1.9% ( 1.9 % ) per year from 2012 through 2017 .

although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) .

we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants .

Answer: 10.8%

Answer: 10.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -364.

Rejected response: -1574.

AMT || what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2005?

Answer: -364

the employee separations of liability as of january 1 2004 is $ 2239 ; the employee separations of 2004 expense is $ 823 ; the employee separations of 2004 cash payments is $ -2397 ( 2397 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 665 ; the employee separations of 2005 expense is $ 84 ; the employee separations of 2005 cash payments is $ -448 ( 448 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 301 ; the employee separations of 2006 expense is $ -267 ( 267 ) ; the employee separations of 2006 cash payments is $ -34 ( 34 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2006 is $ 0 ;

the accrued restructuring liability is reflected in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2005 .

restructuring expense 2014the following table displays activity with respect to the accrued restructuring liability for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 ( in thousands ) : liability as of january 1 , expense payments liability december 31 , expense payments liability december 31 , expense payments liability december 31 .

the total of liability as of january 1 2004 is $ 3689 ; the total of 2004 expense is $ 692 ; the total of 2004 cash payments is $ -3285 ( 3285 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 1096 ; the total of 2005 expense is $ 96 ; the total of 2005 cash payments is $ -773 ( 773 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 419 ; the total of 2006 expense is $ -277 ( 277 ) ; the total of 2006 cash payments is $ -142 ( 142 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2006 is $ 0 ;

Answer: -364

Question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2004?

Answer: -1574

Answer: -1574


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -5781.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations <TIME>?' is -5781.

Rejected response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations <TIME>?' is -5781.

AMT || what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations <TIME>?

what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2005?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2005?

Answer: -5781

employee separations the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2005 $ 20963 is liability as of december 31 2005 $ 20963 ; the employee separations of 2006 expense $ 496 is 2006 expense $ 496 ; the employee separations of 2006 cash payments $ -12389 ( 12389 ) is 2006 cash payments $ -12389 ( 12389 ) ; the employee separations of other $ -1743 ( 1743 ) is other $ -1743 ( 1743 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2006 $ 7327 is liability as of december 31 2006 $ 7327 ; the employee separations of 2007 expense $ 633 is 2007 expense $ 633 ; the employee separations of 2007 cash payments $ -6110 ( 6110 ) is 2007 cash payments $ -6110 ( 6110 ) ; the employee separations of other $ -304 ( 304 ) is other $ -304 ( 304 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2007 $ 1546 is liability as of december 31 2007 $ 1546 ; the employee separations of 2008 expense $ 284 is 2008 expense $ 284 ; the employee separations of 2008 cash payments $ -1901 ( 1901 ) is 2008 cash payments $ -1901 ( 1901 ) ; the employee separations of other $ 71 is other $ 71 ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2008 2014 is liability as of december 31 2008 2014 ;

merger related expense 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company assumed certain obligations , as a result of the merger with spectrasite , inc. , primarily related to employee separation costs of former spectrasite employees .

Answer: -5781

Answer: -5781


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2005 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: 11%.

Question: in 2005 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

Answer: 13%

capital spending from continuing operations was $ 1.0 billion in 2006 , or 87% ( 87 % ) of depreciation and amortization , comparable to $ 992 million , or 78% ( 78 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2005 , and $ 925 mil- lion , or 73% ( 73 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2004 .

in millions the consumer packaging of 2006 is 116 ; the consumer packaging of 2005 is 126 ; the consumer packaging of 2004 is 198 ;

in millions the total from continuing operations of 2006 is $ 1009 ; the total from continuing operations of 2005 is $ 992 ; the total from continuing operations of 2004 is $ 925 ;

Answer: 13%

Question: in 2006 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

Answer: 11%

Answer: 11%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2017?\\n
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 95983.54.

Rejected response: 117624.84.

GPN || what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , <TIME>?\\n

Question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2017?\\n

Answer: 95983.54

the unvested at december 31 2017 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1226 ; the unvested at december 31 2017 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 78.29 ;

The unvested at december 31 2018 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1084 ; The unvested at december 31 2018 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 108.51 ;

The unvested at december 31 2016 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1263 ; The unvested at december 31 2016 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 49.55 ;

the unvested at december 31 2016 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1263 ; the unvested at december 31 2016 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 49.55 ;

the unvested at december 31 2018 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1084 ; the unvested at december 31 2018 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 108.51 ;

Answer: 95983.54

Question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2018?\\n

Answer: 117624.84

Explanation: this gives us the potential compensation look for the net granting activity at year end .

The unvested at december 31 2017 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1226 ; The unvested at december 31 2017 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 78.29 ;

Answer: 117624.84


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -364.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability <TIME>?' is -364.

Rejected response: From 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability <TIME>?' is -364.

Question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2005?

Answer: -364

the employee separations of liability as of january 1 2004 is $ 2239 ; the employee separations of 2004 expense is $ 823 ; the employee separations of 2004 cash payments is $ -2397 ( 2397 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 665 ; the employee separations of 2005 expense is $ 84 ; the employee separations of 2005 cash payments is $ -448 ( 448 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 301 ; the employee separations of 2006 expense is $ -267 ( 267 ) ; the employee separations of 2006 cash payments is $ -34 ( 34 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2006 is $ 0 ;

the total of liability as of january 1 2004 is $ 3689 ; the total of 2004 expense is $ 692 ; the total of 2004 cash payments is $ -3285 ( 3285 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 1096 ; the total of 2005 expense is $ 96 ; the total of 2005 cash payments is $ -773 ( 773 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 419 ; the total of 2006 expense is $ -277 ( 277 ) ; the total of 2006 cash payments is $ -142 ( 142 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2006 is $ 0 ;

Answer: -364

Answer: -364


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percentage of total net revenue <TIME> was net interest income?
Fixed answer: 27%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total net revenue <TIME> was net interest income?' is 27%.

Rejected response: From 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total net revenue <TIME> was net interest income?' is 27%.

JPM || what percentage of total net revenue <TIME> was net interest income?

what percentage of total net revenue in 2015 was net interest income?

Question: what percentage of total net revenue in 2015 was net interest income?

Answer: 27%

( in millions ) the net interest income of 2015 is 43510 ; the net interest income of 2014 is 43634 ; the net interest income of 2013 is 43319 ;

( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2015 is $ 93543 ; the total net revenue of 2014 is $ 95112 ; the total net revenue of 2013 is $ 97367 ;

2014 compared with 2013 total net revenue for 2014 was down by 2% ( 2 % ) compared with the prior year , predominantly due to lower mortgage fees and related income and lower other income .

( a ) included operating lease income of $ 2.1 billion , $ 1.7 billion and $ 1.5 billion for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .

Answer: 27%

Answer: 27%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: excluding derivatives , what are net <TIME> trading assets , in millions?
Fixed answer: 305261.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'excluding derivatives , what are net <TIME> trading assets , in millions?' is 305261.

Rejected response: From 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'excluding derivatives , what are net <TIME> trading assets , in millions?' is 305261.

JPM || excluding derivatives , what are net <TIME> trading assets , in millions?

excluding derivatives , what are net 2008 trading assets , in millions?

Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2008 trading assets , in millions?

Answer: 305261

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2009 is $ 318063 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2008 is $ 384102 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2007 is $ 381415 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2009 is $ 60224 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2008 is $ 78841 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2007 is $ 94737 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) The trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2009 is 110457 ; The trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2008 is 121417 ; The trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2007 is 65439 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2009 is 110457 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2008 is 121417 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2007 is 65439 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2009 is 77901 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2008 is 93200 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2007 is 65198 ;

Answer: 305261

Answer: 305261


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 27%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be <TIME>?' is 27%.

Rejected response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be <TIME>?' is 27%.

FIS || what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be <TIME>?

what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2017?

Question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2017?

Answer: 27%

currency the euro of 2017 is 35 ; the euro of 2016 is 38 ; the euro of 2015 is 33 ;

currency the total increase or decrease of 2017 is $ 130 ; the total increase or decrease of 2016 is $ 129 ; the total increase or decrease of 2015 is $ 106 ;

dollar during these years compared to the preceding year .

Answer: 27%

Answer: 27%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2013 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 25%.

Rejected response: 27%.

GS || what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce <TIME> were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2013 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Answer: 25%

in millions the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2013 is 45826 ; the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is 46984 ;

in millions the total of average for theyear ended december 2013 is $ 182650 ; the total of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 172095 ;

the table below presents the fair value of the securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in our gce .

in millions the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2013 is $ 136824 ; the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 125111 ;

Answer: 25%

Question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2012 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Answer: 27%

Answer: 27%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the growth rate in total sales <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -6.8%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in total sales <TIME>?' is -6.8%.

Rejected response: From 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in total sales <TIME>?' is -6.8%.

MRK || what is the growth rate in total sales <TIME>?

what is the growth rate in total sales in 2013?

Question: what is the growth rate in total sales in 2013?

Answer: -6.8%

( $ in millions ) the total sales of 2013 is $ 44033 ; the total sales of 2012 is $ 47267 ; the total sales of 2011 is $ 48047 ;

product sales sales of the company 2019s top pharmaceutical products , as well as total sales of animal health and consumer care products , were as follows: .

on october 1 , 2013 , the company divested a substantial portion of its third-party manufacturing sales .

( $ in millions ) the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2013 is 1306 ; the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2012 is 1273 ; the proquad/m-m-rii/varivax of 2011 is 1202 ;

Answer: -6.8%

Answer: -6.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2001 compare to 2000?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -29.9%.

Rejected response: 12.0%.

D || what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2001 compare to 2000?

Answer: -29.9%

rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense was $ 84 million , $ 75 million and $ 107 million for 2002 , 2001 , and 2000 , respectively .

substantially all of the value was attributed to the power pur- chase contracts which were terminated and resulted in a charge included in operation and maintenance expense .

capacity and other purchases under these contracts totaled $ 691 million , $ 680 million and $ 740 million for 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .

the table below reflects dominion 2019s minimum commitments as of december 31 , 2002 under these contracts. .

estimated payments under these commitments for the next five years are as follows : 2003 2014$ 599 million ; 2004 2014$ 311 million ; 2005 2014$ 253 million ; 2006 2014$ 205 mil- lion ; 2007 2014$ 89 million ; and years beyond 2007 2014$ 215 mil- lion .

Answer: -29.9%

Question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2002 compare to 2001?

Answer: 12.0%

the natural gas purchase com- mitments of dominion 2019s field services operations are also included , net of related sales commitments .

Answer: 12.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2012?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 6%.

Rejected response: 15%.

UPS || what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , <TIME> are due <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2012?

Answer: 6%

commitment type the total of 2011 is $ 2944 ; the total of 2012 is $ 1334 ; the total of 2013 is $ 3515 ; the total of 2014 is $ 2059 ; the total of 2015 is $ 820 ; the total of after 2016 is $ 12884 ; the total of total is $ 23556 ;

the following table summarizes the expected cash outflow to satisfy our contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 ( in millions ) : .

contractual commitments we have contractual obligations and commitments in the form of capital leases , operating leases , debt obligations , purchase commitments , and certain other liabilities .

commitment type the debt principal of 2011 is 345 ; the debt principal of 2012 is 2014 ; the debt principal of 2013 is 1750 ; the debt principal of 2014 is 1000 ; the debt principal of 2015 is 100 ; the debt principal of after 2016 is 7363 ; the debt principal of total is 10558 ;

the table above does not include approximately $ 284 million of liabilities for .

Answer: 6%

Question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2013?

Answer: 15%

Answer: 15%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment during 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 56.5%.

Rejected response: 54.1%.

Question: what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment during 2014?

Answer: 56.5%

( cans and packs in millions ) the copenhagen of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2014 is 448.6 ; the copenhagen of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2013 is 426.1 ; the copenhagen of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012 is 392.5 ;

( cans and packs in millions ) the copenhagenandskoal of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2014 is 718.2 ; the copenhagenandskoal of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2013 is 709.9 ; the copenhagenandskoal of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012 is 680.9 ;

( cans and packs in millions ) the total smokeless products of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2014 is 793.3 ; the total smokeless products of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2013 is 787.5 ; the total smokeless products of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012 is 763.3 ;

Answer: 56.5%

Question: what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment during 2013?

Answer: 54.1%

Answer: 54.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2014 to the end of 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -35.

Rejected response: -530.

CMCSA || what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of <TIME> to the end of <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2014 to the end of 2015?

Answer: -35

( in millions ) the balance december 31 of 2015 is $ 1136 ; the balance december 31 of 2014 is $ 1171 ; the balance december 31 of 2013 is $ 1701 ;

reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits .

uncertain tax positions our uncertain tax positions as of december 31 , 2015 totaled $ 1.1 billion , which exclude the federal benefits on state tax positions that were recorded as deferred income taxes .

( in millions ) the balance january 1 of 2015 is $ 1171 ; the balance january 1 of 2014 is $ 1701 ; the balance january 1 of 2013 is $ 1573 ;

( in millions ) the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2015 is -84 ( 84 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2014 is -220 ( 220 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2013 is -141 ( 141 ) ;

Answer: -35

Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2013 to the end of 2014?

Answer: -530

Answer: -530


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the net change in cash <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -312.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in cash <TIME>?' is -312.

Rejected response: From 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in cash <TIME>?' is -312.

BKR || what is the net change in cash <TIME>?

what is the net change in cash during 2016?

Question: what is the net change in cash during 2016?

Answer: -312

( in millions ) the operating activities of 2017 is $ -799 ( 799 ) ; the operating activities of 2016 is $ 262 ; the operating activities of 2015 is $ 1277 ;

( in millions ) the investing activities of 2017 is -4130 ( 4130 ) ; the investing activities of 2016 is -472 ( 472 ) ; the investing activities of 2015 is -466 ( 466 ) ;

( in millions ) the financing activities of 2017 is 10919 ; the financing activities of 2016 is -102 ( 102 ) ; the financing activities of 2015 is -515 ( 515 ) ;

at december 31 , 2017 , we had cash and equivalents of $ 7.0 billion compared to $ 981 million of cash and equivalents at december 31 , 2016 .

cash flows cash flows provided by ( used in ) each type of activity were as follows for the years ended december 31: .

Answer: -312

Answer: -312


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: excluding derivatives , what are net <TIME> trading assets , in millions?
Fixed answer: 257839.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'excluding derivatives , what are net <TIME> trading assets , in millions?' is 257839.

Rejected response: From 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'excluding derivatives , what are net <TIME> trading assets , in millions?' is 257839.

excluding derivatives , what are net 2009 trading assets , in millions?

Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2009 trading assets , in millions?

Answer: 257839

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2009 is $ 318063 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2008 is $ 384102 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2007 is $ 381415 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2009 is 110457 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2008 is 121417 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2007 is 65439 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2009 is 77901 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2008 is 93200 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2007 is 65198 ;

Answer: 257839

Answer: 257839


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations between 2009 and 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -50%.

Rejected response: -14%.

BLL || what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations between 2009 and 2010?

Answer: -50%

( $ in millions ) the net sales of 2010 is $ 318.5 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 634.9 ; the net sales of 2008 is $ 735.4 ;

( $ in millions ) The discontinued operations net of tax of 2010 is $ -74.9 ( 74.9 ) ; The discontinued operations net of tax of 2009 is $ -2.2 ( 2.2 ) ; The discontinued operations net of tax of 2008 is $ 4.6 ;

( $ in millions ) the earnings from operations of 2010 is $ 3.5 ; the earnings from operations of 2009 is $ 19.6 ; the earnings from operations of 2008 is $ 18.2 ;

( $ in millions ) the discontinued operations net of tax of 2010 is $ -74.9 ( 74.9 ) ; the discontinued operations net of tax of 2009 is $ -2.2 ( 2.2 ) ; the discontinued operations net of tax of 2008 is $ 4.6 ;

Answer: -50%

Question: what was the percentage change in net sales for the discontinued operations between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: -14%

Answer: -14%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 18%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2021-01-01 00:00:00 to 2022-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due <TIME>?' is 18%.

Rejected response: From 2020-01-01 00:00:00 to 2021-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due <TIME>?' is 18%.

UNP || what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due <TIME>?

what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2021?

Question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2021?

Answer: 18%

millions the 2021 of operatingleases is 303 ; the 2021 of capitalleases is 159 ;

millions the present value of minimum lease payments of operatingleases is n/a ; the present value of minimum lease payments of capitalleases is $ 754 ;

millions the total minimum lease payments of operatingleases is $ 2646 ; the total minimum lease payments of capitalleases is $ 898 ;

millions the 2019 of operatingleases is $ 419 ; the 2019 of capitalleases is $ 148 ;

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total managed consumer loans from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 15%.

Rejected response: -7%.

C || what was the percentage change in total managed consumer loans <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in total managed consumer loans from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 15%

in billions of dollars the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2008 is $ 621.6 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2007 is $ 666.9 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2006 is $ 577.8 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2008 is $ 656.2 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2007 is $ 618.3 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of 2006 is $ 542.9 ;

in billions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 on-balance-sheet ( 1 ) $ 515.7 $ 557.8 $ 478.2 $ 548.8 $ 516.4 $ 446.2 securitized receivables ( all in na cards ) 105.9 108.1 99.6 106.9 98.9 96.4 credit card receivables held-for-sale ( 2 ) 2014 1.0 2014 0.5 3.0 0.3 total managed ( 3 ) $ 621.6 $ 666.9 $ 577.8 $ 656.2 $ 618.3 $ 542.9 ( 1 ) total loans and total average loans exclude certain interest and fees on credit cards of approximately $ 3 billion and $ 2 billion , respectively , for 2008 , $ 3 billion and $ 2 billion , respectively , for 2007 , and $ 2 billion and $ 3 billion , respectively , for 2006 , which are included in consumer loans on the consolidated balance sheet .

citigroup 2019s total allowance for loans , leases and unfunded lending commitments of $ 30.503 billion is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the entire portfolio .

for analytical purposes only , the portion of citigroup 2019s allowance for loan losses attributed to the consumer portfolio was $ 22.366 billion at december 31 , 2008 , $ 12.393 billion at december 31 , 2007 and $ 6.006 billion at december 31 , 2006 .

Answer: 15%

Question: what was the percentage change in total managed consumer loans from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -7%

Answer: -7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase from 2003 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 62.3%.

Rejected response: 34.9%.

MRO || by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase <TIME>?

Question: by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase from 2003 to 2005?

Answer: 62.3%

december 31 2003 the december 31 2005 of $ 438 is 711 ;

the following summarizes the total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations as if fin no .

47 , 2018 2018accounting for conditional asset retirement obligations 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no .

december 31 2003 the december 31 2003 of $ 438 is $ 438 ;

december 31 2003 the december 31 2004 of $ 438 is 527 ;

Answer: 62.3%

Question: by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 34.9%

Answer: 34.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 15%.

Rejected response: 6%.

Question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2013?

Answer: 15%

commitment type the debt principal of 2011 is 345 ; the debt principal of 2012 is 2014 ; the debt principal of 2013 is 1750 ; the debt principal of 2014 is 1000 ; the debt principal of 2015 is 100 ; the debt principal of after 2016 is 7363 ; the debt principal of total is 10558 ;

commitment type the total of 2011 is $ 2944 ; the total of 2012 is $ 1334 ; the total of 2013 is $ 3515 ; the total of 2014 is $ 2059 ; the total of 2015 is $ 820 ; the total of after 2016 is $ 12884 ; the total of total is $ 23556 ;

the table above does not include approximately $ 284 million of liabilities for .

Answer: 15%

Question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2012?

Answer: 6%

Answer: 6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5781.

Rejected response: -13636.

Question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2005?

Answer: -5781

employee separations the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2005 $ 20963 is liability as of december 31 2005 $ 20963 ; the employee separations of 2006 expense $ 496 is 2006 expense $ 496 ; the employee separations of 2006 cash payments $ -12389 ( 12389 ) is 2006 cash payments $ -12389 ( 12389 ) ; the employee separations of other $ -1743 ( 1743 ) is other $ -1743 ( 1743 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2006 $ 7327 is liability as of december 31 2006 $ 7327 ; the employee separations of 2007 expense $ 633 is 2007 expense $ 633 ; the employee separations of 2007 cash payments $ -6110 ( 6110 ) is 2007 cash payments $ -6110 ( 6110 ) ; the employee separations of other $ -304 ( 304 ) is other $ -304 ( 304 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2007 $ 1546 is liability as of december 31 2007 $ 1546 ; the employee separations of 2008 expense $ 284 is 2008 expense $ 284 ; the employee separations of 2008 cash payments $ -1901 ( 1901 ) is 2008 cash payments $ -1901 ( 1901 ) ; the employee separations of other $ 71 is other $ 71 ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2008 2014 is liability as of december 31 2008 2014 ;

Answer: -5781

Question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2006?

Answer: -13636

in addition , the company also incurred certain merger related costs for additional employee retention and separation costs incurred during the year ended december 31 , 2006 .

these costs were recognized as an assumed liability in the purchase price allocation .

Answer: -13636


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2018 was do to interest rate risks?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 57%.

Rejected response: 54%.

C || what percentage of total principal transactions revenue <TIME> was do to interest rate risks?

Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2018 was do to interest rate risks?

Answer: 57%

in millions of dollars the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2018 is $ 5186 ; the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2017 is $ 5301 ; the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2016 is $ 4229 ;

in millions of dollars the total of 2018 is $ 9062 ; the total of 2017 is $ 9475 ; the total of 2016 is $ 7857 ;

the following table presents principal transactions revenue: .

( 5 ) includes revenues from structured credit products. .

Answer: 57%

Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2016 was do to interest rate risks?

Answer: 54%

Answer: 54%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 due in 2011 are maturities of long-term debt?
Reference time interval: 2009-12-31 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 41%.

Rejected response: 21%.

IP || what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations <TIME> due <TIME> are maturities of long-term debt?

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 due in 2011 are maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 41%

in millions the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2010 is $ 304 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2011 is $ 574 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2012 is $ 199 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2013 is $ 131 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of 2014 is $ 562 ; the maturities of long-term debt ( a ) of thereafter is $ 7263 ;

in millions the total ( d ) of 2010 is $ 3262 ; the total ( d ) of 2011 is $ 1407 ; the total ( d ) of 2012 is $ 946 ; the total ( d ) of 2013 is $ 783 ; the total ( d ) of 2014 is $ 1173 ; the total ( d ) of thereafter is $ 16284 ;

contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 , were as follows : in millions 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 thereafter maturities of long-term debt ( a ) $ 304 $ 574 $ 199 $ 131 $ 562 $ 7263 debt obligations with right of offset ( b ) 519 28 2013 2013 2013 5108 .

in millions the lease obligations of 2010 is 177 ; the lease obligations of 2011 is 148 ; the lease obligations of 2012 is 124 ; the lease obligations of 2013 is 96 ; the lease obligations of 2014 is 79 ; the lease obligations of thereafter is 184 ;

Answer: 41%

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2009 due in 2012 are maturities of long-term debt?

Answer: 21%

Answer: 21%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total managed consumer loans from 2007 to 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -7%.

Rejected response: 15%.

Question: what was the percentage change in total managed consumer loans from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -7%

in billions of dollars the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2008 is $ 621.6 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2007 is $ 666.9 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2006 is $ 577.8 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2008 is $ 656.2 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of end of period 2007 is $ 618.3 ; the total managed ( 3 ) of 2006 is $ 542.9 ;

in billions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 on-balance-sheet ( 1 ) $ 515.7 $ 557.8 $ 478.2 $ 548.8 $ 516.4 $ 446.2 securitized receivables ( all in na cards ) 105.9 108.1 99.6 106.9 98.9 96.4 credit card receivables held-for-sale ( 2 ) 2014 1.0 2014 0.5 3.0 0.3 total managed ( 3 ) $ 621.6 $ 666.9 $ 577.8 $ 656.2 $ 618.3 $ 542.9 ( 1 ) total loans and total average loans exclude certain interest and fees on credit cards of approximately $ 3 billion and $ 2 billion , respectively , for 2008 , $ 3 billion and $ 2 billion , respectively , for 2007 , and $ 2 billion and $ 3 billion , respectively , for 2006 , which are included in consumer loans on the consolidated balance sheet .

for analytical purposes only , the portion of citigroup 2019s allowance for loan losses attributed to the consumer portfolio was $ 22.366 billion at december 31 , 2008 , $ 12.393 billion at december 31 , 2007 and $ 6.006 billion at december 31 , 2006 .

Answer: -7%

Question: what was the percentage change in total managed consumer loans from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 15%

Answer: 15%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3%.

Rejected response: 42%.

FIS || what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 3%

currency the euro of 2012 is 27.1 ; the euro of 2011 is 26.4 ; the euro of 2010 is 18.6 ;

the impact on earnings of the foregoing assumed 10% ( 10 % ) change in each of the periods presented would not have been significant .

currency The total impact of 2012 is $ 90.3 ; The total impact of 2011 is $ 90.0 ; The total impact of 2010 is $ 62.7 ;

currency the total impact of 2012 is $ 90.3 ; the total impact of 2011 is $ 90.0 ; the total impact of 2010 is $ 62.7 ;

Answer: 3%

Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 42%

Answer: 42%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in free cash flow from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 102%.

Rejected response: 35%.

UNP || what was the percentage change in free cash flow <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in free cash flow from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 102%

millions the free cash flow of 2011 is $ 1917 ; the free cash flow of 2010 is $ 1415 ; the free cash flow of 2009 is $ 699 ;

f0b7 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled $ 5.9 billion , yielding record free cash flow of $ 1.9 billion in 2011 .

the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2011 2010 2009 .

millions the cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 5873 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2010 is $ 4105 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2009 is $ 3204 ;

millions the cash used in investing activities of 2011 is -3119 ( 3119 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2010 is -2488 ( 2488 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2009 is -2145 ( 2145 ) ;

Answer: 102%

Question: what was the percentage change in free cash flow from 2001 to 2011?

Answer: 35%

free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .

Answer: 35%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 34%.

Rejected response: 33%.

CMCSA || what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2015?

Answer: 34%

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the cable distribution system of 2015 is $ 2424 ; the cable distribution system of 2014 is $ 2047 ; the cable distribution system of 2013 is $ 1819 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the other equipment of 2015 is 756 ; the other equipment of 2014 is 613 ; the other equipment of 2013 is 527 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total of 2015 is $ 7034 ; the total of 2014 is $ 6154 ; the total of 2013 is $ 5403 ;

the table below summarizes the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable communications segment in 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .

Answer: 34%

Question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2014?

Answer: 33%

Answer: 33%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total contractual obligations in 2011 are made up of long-term debt obligations?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 97%.

Rejected response: 56%.

C || what percent of total contractual obligations <TIME> are made up of long-term debt obligations?

Question: what percent of total contractual obligations in 2011 are made up of long-term debt obligations?

Answer: 97%

in millions of dollars at year end the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 47162 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 59656 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 69344 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 28132 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2014 is $ 34895 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 124830 ;

in millions of dollars at year end the total of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 83659 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 61368 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 70718 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 29334 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2014 is $ 36040 ; the total of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 131392 ;

in millions of dollars at year end The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2010 is 1032 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2011 is 446 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2012 is 331 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2013 is 267 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year 2014 is 258 ; The purchase obligations of contractual obligations by year thereafter is 783 ;

( 2 ) relates primarily to accounts payable and accrued expenses included in other liabilities in citi 2019s consolidated balance sheet. .

Answer: 97%

Question: what percent of total contractual obligations in 2010 are made up of long-term debt obligations?

Answer: 56%

Answer: 56%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in cash during 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -312.

Rejected response: 296.

Question: what is the net change in cash during 2016?

Answer: -312

at december 31 , 2017 , we had cash and equivalents of $ 7.0 billion compared to $ 981 million of cash and equivalents at december 31 , 2016 .

cash flows cash flows provided by ( used in ) each type of activity were as follows for the years ended december 31: .

( in millions ) the operating activities of 2017 is $ -799 ( 799 ) ; the operating activities of 2016 is $ 262 ; the operating activities of 2015 is $ 1277 ;

Answer: -312

Question: what is the net change in cash during 2015?

Answer: 296

Answer: 296


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3%.

Rejected response: 70%.

FIS || what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -3%

cash flows from operations cash flows from operations were $ 1925 million , $ 1131 million and $ 1165 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 respectively .

the 2016 increase in cash flows from operations is primarily due to increased net earnings , after the add back of non-cash depreciation and amortization , as a result of sungard operations being included for the full year .

we expect that cash and cash equivalents plus cash flows from operations over the next twelve months will be sufficient to fund our operating cash requirements , capital expenditures and mandatory debt service .

type of obligations the total of total is $ 14429 ; the total of payments due in less than 1 year is $ 1068 ; the total of payments due in 1-3 years is $ 2712 ; the total of payments due in 3-5 years is $ 3264 ; the total of payments due in more than 5 years is $ 7385 ;

Answer: -3%

Question: what was the percentage change in cash flows from operations from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 70%

ck ash flows from operations increased $ 794 million in 2016 and decreased $ 34 million in 2015 .

Answer: 70%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the net change in cash <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 296.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in cash <TIME>?' is 296.

Rejected response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in cash <TIME>?' is 296.

what is the net change in cash during 2015?

Question: what is the net change in cash during 2015?

Answer: 296

at december 31 , 2017 , we had cash and equivalents of $ 7.0 billion compared to $ 981 million of cash and equivalents at december 31 , 2016 .

cash flows cash flows provided by ( used in ) each type of activity were as follows for the years ended december 31: .

( in millions ) the operating activities of 2017 is $ -799 ( 799 ) ; the operating activities of 2016 is $ 262 ; the operating activities of 2015 is $ 1277 ;

Answer: 296

Answer: 296


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2016 compare to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -41.

Rejected response: 33.

CE || what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2016 compare to 2015?

Answer: -41

research and development expense was $ 78 million , $ 119 million and $ 86 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives .

research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications .

Answer: -41

Question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2015 compare to 2014?

Answer: 33

Answer: 33


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17%.

Rejected response: 18%.

CMCSA || scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment <TIME>?

Question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2007?

Answer: 17%

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2008 is 1024 ; the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2007 is 1014 ; the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2006 is 906 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total of 2008 is $ 5545 ; the total of 2007 is $ 5993 ; the total of 2006 is $ 4244 ;

the table below summarizes the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable segment from 2006 through 2008. .

Answer: 17%

Question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2008?

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 18.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities <TIME>?' is 18.

Rejected response: From 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities <TIME>?' is 18.

AON || what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities <TIME>?

what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2006?

Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2006?

Answer: 18

balance at january 1 2005 the expensed in 2006 of $ 2014 is 155 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the cash payments in 2006 of $ 2014 is -141 ( 141 ) ;

balance at january 1 2005 the foreign currency revaluation of $ 2014 is 4 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2006 of $ 2014 is 134 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2007 of $ 2014 is $ 63 ;

Answer: 18

Answer: 18


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the growth rate in dividends received <TIME> compare to <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 6.4%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in dividends received <TIME> compare to <TIME>?' is 6.4%.

Rejected response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in dividends received <TIME> compare to <TIME>?' is 6.4%.

CE || what is the growth rate in dividends received <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2012 compare to 2011?

Question: what is the growth rate in dividends received in 2012 compare to 2011?

Answer: 6.4%

in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we received cash dividends of $ 92 million , $ 83 million and $ 78 million , respectively .

although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) .

we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants .

Answer: 6.4%

Answer: 6.4%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2009?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 28%.

Rejected response: 30%.

C || what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses <TIME>?

Question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2009?

Answer: 28%

Explanation: looking to see if the cost are outweighed by the payment stream prior to other write offs .

in millions of dollars the net interest revenue of 2009 is $ 3173 ; the net interest revenue of 2008 is $ 3332 ; the net interest revenue of 2007 is $ 2723 ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 5 ) % ( % ) ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is 22% ( 22 % ) ;

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2009 is $ 896 ; the total operating expenses of 2008 is $ 988 ; the total operating expenses of 2007 is $ 1070 ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 9 ) % ( % ) ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is ( 8 ) % ( % ) ;

operating expenses decreased 8% ( 8 % ) , mainly driven by lower compensation and transaction expenses .

in millions of dollars the revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ -3682 ( 3682 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -39574 ( 39574 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -17896 ( 17896 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is 91% ( 91 % ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is nm ;

Answer: 28%

Question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2008?

Answer: 30%

Answer: 30%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -13636.

Rejected response: -5781.

AMT || what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2006?

Answer: -13636

employee separations the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2005 $ 20963 is liability as of december 31 2005 $ 20963 ; the employee separations of 2006 expense $ 496 is 2006 expense $ 496 ; the employee separations of 2006 cash payments $ -12389 ( 12389 ) is 2006 cash payments $ -12389 ( 12389 ) ; the employee separations of other $ -1743 ( 1743 ) is other $ -1743 ( 1743 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2006 $ 7327 is liability as of december 31 2006 $ 7327 ; the employee separations of 2007 expense $ 633 is 2007 expense $ 633 ; the employee separations of 2007 cash payments $ -6110 ( 6110 ) is 2007 cash payments $ -6110 ( 6110 ) ; the employee separations of other $ -304 ( 304 ) is other $ -304 ( 304 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2007 $ 1546 is liability as of december 31 2007 $ 1546 ; the employee separations of 2008 expense $ 284 is 2008 expense $ 284 ; the employee separations of 2008 cash payments $ -1901 ( 1901 ) is 2008 cash payments $ -1901 ( 1901 ) ; the employee separations of other $ 71 is other $ 71 ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2008 2014 is liability as of december 31 2008 2014 ;

Answer: -13636

Question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2005?

Answer: -5781

Answer: -5781


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in collateral posted from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -25%.

Rejected response: -16%.

GS || what was the percentage change in collateral posted <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in collateral posted from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -25%

in millions the collateral posted of as of december 2013 is 18178 ; the collateral posted of as of december 2012 is 24296 ;

in millions The additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 911 ; The additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 1534 ;

in millions The additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 2989 ; The additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 911 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 1534 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 2989 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ;

Answer: -25%

Question: what was the percentage change in collateral posted between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: -16%

in millions the collateral posted of as of december 2012 is 24296 ; the collateral posted of as of december 2011 is 29002 ;

in millions The additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 1534 ; The additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 1303 ;

in millions The additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ; The additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 2183 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 1534 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 1303 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 2183 ;

Answer: -16%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development <TIME> compare to <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -41.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development <TIME> compare to <TIME>?' is -41.

Rejected response: From 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development <TIME> compare to <TIME>?' is -41.

Question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2016 compare to 2015?

Answer: -41

research and development expense was $ 78 million , $ 119 million and $ 86 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives .

Answer: -41

Answer: -41


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 30%.

Rejected response: 28%.

Question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2008?

Answer: 30%

in millions of dollars the net interest revenue of 2009 is $ 3173 ; the net interest revenue of 2008 is $ 3332 ; the net interest revenue of 2007 is $ 2723 ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 5 ) % ( % ) ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is 22% ( 22 % ) ;

in millions of dollars the revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ -3682 ( 3682 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -39574 ( 39574 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -17896 ( 17896 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is 91% ( 91 % ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is nm ;

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2009 is $ 896 ; the total operating expenses of 2008 is $ 988 ; the total operating expenses of 2007 is $ 1070 ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 9 ) % ( % ) ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is ( 8 ) % ( % ) ;

Answer: 30%

Question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2009?

Answer: 28%

Explanation: looking to see if the cost are outweighed by the payment stream prior to other write offs .

Answer: 28%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 due in 2008 is attributable to total debt repayments?
Reference time interval: 2006-12-31 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18%.

Rejected response: 22%.

IP || what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations <TIME> due <TIME> is attributable to total debt repayments?

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 due in 2008 is attributable to total debt repayments?

Answer: 18%

in millions the total debt ( a ) of 2007 is $ 692 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2008 is $ 129 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2009 is $ 1143 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2010 is $ 1198 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2011 is $ 381 ; the total debt ( a ) of thereafter is $ 3680 ;

in millions the total of 2007 is $ 3165 ; the total of 2008 is $ 708 ; the total of 2009 is $ 1599 ; the total of 2010 is $ 1624 ; the total of 2011 is $ 764 ; the total of thereafter is $ 5584 ;

contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 , were as follows : in millions 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter .

principal financial covenants include maintenance of a minimum net worth , defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock , plus any goodwill impairment charges , of $ 9 billion ; and a maximum total debt to capital ratio , defined as total debt divided by total debt plus net worth , of maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy .

Answer: 18%

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 due in 2007 is attributable to total debt repayments?

Answer: 22%

Answer: 22%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2003?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 63.0%.

Rejected response: 69.0%.

ETR || what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool <TIME>?

Question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2003?

Answer: 63.0%

system energy's receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

money pool activity used $ 42.5 million of system energy's operating cash flows in 2004 , used $ 12.0 million in 2003 , and provided $ 6.8 million in 2002 .

Answer: 63.0%

Question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2004?

Answer: 69.0%

management's financial discussion and analysis operating activities cash flow from operations increased by $ 232.1 million in 2004 primarily due to income tax refunds of $ 70.6 million in 2004 compared to income tax payments of $ 230.9 million in 2003 .

Answer: 69.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2013 to the end of 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -530.

Rejected response: -35.

CMCSA || what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of <TIME> to the end of <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2013 to the end of 2014?

Answer: -530

( in millions ) the balance january 1 of 2015 is $ 1171 ; the balance january 1 of 2014 is $ 1701 ; the balance january 1 of 2013 is $ 1573 ;

( in millions ) the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2015 is -84 ( 84 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2014 is -220 ( 220 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2013 is -141 ( 141 ) ;

( in millions ) the balance december 31 of 2015 is $ 1136 ; the balance december 31 of 2014 is $ 1171 ; the balance december 31 of 2013 is $ 1701 ;

Answer: -530

Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2014 to the end of 2015?

Answer: -35

Answer: -35


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18.

Rejected response: -71.

Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2006?

Answer: 18

balance at january 1 2005 the expensed in 2006 of $ 2014 is 155 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2006 of $ 2014 is 134 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2007 of $ 2014 is $ 63 ;

Answer: 18

Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2007?

Answer: -71

balance at january 1 2005 the expensed in 2007 of $ 2014 is 38 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the cash payments in 2007 of $ 2014 is -110 ( 110 ) ;

balance at january 1 2005 the foreign currency revaluation of $ 2014 is 1 ;

balance at january 1 2005 the balance at december 31 2005 of $ 2014 is 116 ;

Answer: -71


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage rent increase between 2007 and 2008?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 22%.

Rejected response: 5%.

IP || what was the percentage rent increase <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage rent increase between 2007 and 2008?

Answer: 22%

rent expense was $ 216 million , $ 205 million and $ 168 million for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

deferred income taxes are not provided for tempo- rary differences of approximately $ 3.5 billion , $ 2.6 billion and $ 3.7 billion as of december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , representing earnings of non-u.s .

the company recorded an income tax provision for 2007 of $ 415 million , including a $ 41 million benefit related to the effective settlement of tax audits , and $ 8 million of other tax benefits .

$ 190 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before equity earnings .

excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 423 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before equity earnings .

Answer: 22%

Question: what was the percentage rent increase between 2008 and 2009?

Answer: 5%

additionally in 2009 , as a result of agree- ments on the 2004 and 2005 u.s .

Answer: 5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total contractual obligations in 2010 are made up of long-term debt obligations?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 56%.

Rejected response: 97%.

Question: what percent of total contractual obligations in 2010 are made up of long-term debt obligations?

Answer: 56%

in millions of dollars at year end the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 47162 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 59656 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 69344 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 28132 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year 2014 is $ 34895 ; the long-term debt obligations ( 1 ) of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 124830 ;

in millions of dollars at year end the total of contractual obligations by year 2010 is $ 83659 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2011 is $ 61368 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2012 is $ 70718 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2013 is $ 29334 ; the total of contractual obligations by year 2014 is $ 36040 ; the total of contractual obligations by year thereafter is $ 131392 ;

( 2 ) relates primarily to accounts payable and accrued expenses included in other liabilities in citi 2019s consolidated balance sheet. .

Answer: 56%

Question: what percent of total contractual obligations in 2011 are made up of long-term debt obligations?

Answer: 97%

Answer: 97%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 3.75%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate <TIME>?' is 3.75%.

Rejected response: From 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate <TIME>?' is 3.75%.

MRO || what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate <TIME>?

what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2016?

Question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2016?

Answer: 3.75%

the initial health care trend rate of 2017 is 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) ; the initial health care trend rate of 2016 is 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) ; the initial health care trend rate of 2015 is 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) ;

the ultimate trend rate of 2017 is 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ; the ultimate trend rate of 2016 is 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ; the ultimate trend rate of 2015 is 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ;

The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2017 is 2025 ; The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2016 is 2025 ; The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2015 is 2024 ;

Answer: 3.75%

Answer: 3.75%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total route miles are main line in 2005?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 52%.

Rejected response: 53%.

UNP || what percent of total route miles are main line <TIME>?

Question: what percent of total route miles are main line in 2005?

Answer: 52%

the main line of 2006 is 27318 ; the main line of 2005 is 27301 ;

the total of 2006 is 51596 ; the total of 2005 is 52667 ;

track 2013 the railroad operates on 32339 main line and branch line route miles in 23 states in the western two-thirds of the united states .

the branch line of 2006 is 5021 ; the branch line of 2005 is 5125 ;

Answer: 52%

Question: what percent of total route miles are main line in 2006?

Answer: 53%

Answer: 53%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 29%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be <TIME>?' is 29%.

Rejected response: From 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be <TIME>?' is 29%.

FIS || what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be <TIME>?

what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2016?

Question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2016?

Answer: 29%

currency the euro of 2017 is 35 ; the euro of 2016 is 38 ; the euro of 2015 is 33 ;

currency the total increase or decrease of 2017 is $ 130 ; the total increase or decrease of 2016 is $ 129 ; the total increase or decrease of 2015 is $ 106 ;

dollar during these years compared to the preceding year .

Answer: 29%

Answer: 29%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -3833.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?' is -3833.

Rejected response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?' is -3833.

AMT || what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits <TIME>?

what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2015?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2015?

Answer: -3833

the balance at january 1 of 2016 is $ 28114 ; the balance at january 1 of 2015 is $ 31947 ; the balance at january 1 of 2014 is $ 32545 ;

the balance at december 31 of 2016 is $ 107551 ; the balance at december 31 of 2015 is $ 28114 ; the balance at december 31 of 2014 is $ 31947 ;

during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the statute of limitations on certain unrecognized tax benefits lapsed and certain positions were effectively settled , which resulted in a decrease of $ 3.2 million , $ 3.5 million and $ 5.3 million , respectively , in the liability for uncertain tax benefits , all of which reduced the income tax provision .

the foreign currency of 2016 is -307 ( 307 ) ; the foreign currency of 2015 is -5371 ( 5371 ) ; the foreign currency of 2014 is -3216 ( 3216 ) ;

Answer: -3833

Answer: -3833


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce <TIME> were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?
Fixed answer: 27%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce <TIME> were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?' is 27%.

Rejected response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce <TIME> were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?' is 27%.

GS || what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce <TIME> were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2012 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2012 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Answer: 27%

in millions the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2013 is $ 136824 ; the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 125111 ;

in millions the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2013 is 45826 ; the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is 46984 ;

in millions the total of average for theyear ended december 2013 is $ 182650 ; the total of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 172095 ;

Answer: 27%

Answer: 27%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenue in 2014 was net interest income?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 46%.

Rejected response: 27%.

JPM || what percentage of total net revenue <TIME> was net interest income?

Question: what percentage of total net revenue in 2014 was net interest income?

Answer: 46%

( in millions ) the net interest income of 2015 is 43510 ; the net interest income of 2014 is 43634 ; the net interest income of 2013 is 43319 ;

( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2015 is $ 93543 ; the total net revenue of 2014 is $ 95112 ; the total net revenue of 2013 is $ 97367 ;

( a ) included operating lease income of $ 2.1 billion , $ 1.7 billion and $ 1.5 billion for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .

Answer: 46%

Question: what percentage of total net revenue in 2015 was net interest income?

Answer: 27%

Answer: 27%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10%.

Rejected response: 5%.

JPM || what was the percentage change in loans retained <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 10%

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans retained of december 31 , 2012 is $ 306222 ; the loans retained of december 31 , 2011 is $ 278395 ; the loans retained of 2012 is $ 1434 ; the loans retained of 2011 is $ 2398 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) The loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2012 is 4406 ; The loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2011 is 2524 ; The loans held-for-sale of 2012 is 18 ; The loans held-for-sale of 2011 is 110 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) The loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2012 is 313183 ; The loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2011 is 283016 ; The loans 2013 reported of 2012 is 1545 ; The loans 2013 reported of 2011 is 2581 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2012 is 4406 ; the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2011 is 2524 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2012 is 18 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2011 is 110 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2012 is 313183 ; the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2011 is 283016 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2012 is 1545 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2011 is 2581 ;

Answer: 10%

Question: what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 5%

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans retained of december 31 , 2014 is $ 324502 ; the loans retained of december 31 , 2013 is $ 308263 ; the loans retained of 2014 is $ 599 ; the loans retained of 2013 is $ 821 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) The loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2014 is 330914 ; The loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2013 is 321564 ; The loans 2013 reported of 2014 is 624 ; The loans 2013 reported of 2013 is 1044 ;

the firm distributes a significant percentage of the loans it originates into the market as part of its syndicated loan business and to manage portfolio concentrations and credit risk .

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2014 is 3801 ; the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2013 is 11290 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2014 is 4 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2013 is 26 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2014 is 330914 ; the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2013 is 321564 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2014 is 624 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2013 is 1044 ;

Answer: 5%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 18%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment <TIME>?' is 18%.

Rejected response: From 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment <TIME>?' is 18%.

CMCSA || scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment <TIME>?

scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2008?

Question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2008?

Answer: 18%

the table below summarizes the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable segment from 2006 through 2008. .

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2008 is 1024 ; the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2007 is 1014 ; the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2006 is 906 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total of 2008 is $ 5545 ; the total of 2007 is $ 5993 ; the total of 2006 is $ 4244 ;

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%