Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 17%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment <TIME>?' is 17%.

Rejected response: From 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment <TIME>?' is 17%.

scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2007?

Question: scalable infrastructure represents what percent of capital expenditures incurred the cable segment during 2007?

Answer: 17%

the table below summarizes the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable segment from 2006 through 2008. .

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2008 is 1024 ; the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2007 is 1014 ; the scalable infrastructure ( b ) of 2006 is 906 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total of 2008 is $ 5545 ; the total of 2007 is $ 5993 ; the total of 2006 is $ 4244 ;

Answer: 17%

Answer: 17%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -4.1.

Rejected response: -1.9.

LMT || what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -4.1

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2014 is 322.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2013 is 326.5 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2012 is 328.4 ;

The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2014 is 316.8 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2013 is 320.9 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2012 is 323.7 ;

note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .

the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding interest rate swaps at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 was $ 1.3 billion and $ 1.2 billion .

the computation of diluted earnings per common share excluded 2.4 million and 8.0 million stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive , primarily due to their exercise prices exceeding the average market prices of our common stock during the respective periods .

Answer: -4.1

Question: what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -1.9

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2014 is 316.8 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2013 is 320.9 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2012 is 323.7 ;

Answer: -1.9

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 32.3%.

Rejected response: 18.2%.

AMT || what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 32.3%

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 approximated $ 655.0 million , $ 495.2 million and $ 419.0 million , respectively. .

such payments at december 31 , 2014 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

pursuant to a settlement agreement dated july 9 , 2014 , all pending state and federal actions between the company and tristar were dismissed with prejudice and without payment of damages .

Answer: 32.3%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 18.2%

in addition , on february 16 , 2012 , tristar brought a federal action against the company in the united states district court for the northern district of texas ( the 201cdistrict court 201d ) , in which tristar principally alleged that the company made misrepresentations to landowners when competing with tristar for land under the company 2019s owned or managed sites .

on january 22 , 2013 , the company filed an amended answer and counterclaim against tristar and certain of its employees , denying tristar 2019s claims and asserting that tristar engaged in a pattern of unlawful activity , including : ( i ) entering into agreements not to compete for land under certain towers ; and ( ii ) making widespread misrepresentations to landowners regarding both tristar and the company .

Answer: 18.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1.3%.

Rejected response: -2.1%.

GS || what is the growth rate in operating expenses <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2014?

Answer: -1.3%

$ in millions the total operating expenses of year ended december 2014 is $ 22171 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2013 is $ 22469 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2012 is $ 22956 ;

management 2019s discussion and analysis operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity .

operating expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 22.17 billion for 2014 , essentially unchanged compared with 2013 .

operating expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 22.47 billion for 2013 , 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2012 .

Answer: -1.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2013?

Answer: -2.1%

Answer: -2.1%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what was <TIME> gross margin percent?
Fixed answer: 18%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was <TIME> gross margin percent?' is 18%.

Rejected response: From 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was <TIME> gross margin percent?' is 18%.

CDW || what was <TIME> gross margin percent?

Question: what was 2016 gross margin percent?

Answer: 18%

( dollars in millions ) the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2017 is $ 15191.5 ; the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2016 is $ 13981.9 ; the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2015 is $ 12988.7 ;

( dollars in millions ) the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2017 is 2449.9 ; the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2016 is 2327.2 ; the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2015 is 2115.8 ;

table of contents in this form 10-k , we discuss non-gaap income before income taxes , non-gaap net income , non-gaap net income per diluted share , ebitda , adjusted ebitda and adjusted ebitda margin , which are non-gaap financial measures .

( dollars in millions ) the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2017 is 59.8 ; the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2016 is 55.0 ; the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2015 is 51.1 ;

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%

Rejected interval is a real interval from the same grouped question and does not overlap with the chosen interval.

Statement preference uses non-overlapping intervals only.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 3.0%.

Rejected response: -3.6%.

BLK || what is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 3.0%

rent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements amounted to $ 132 million , $ 137 million and $ 133 million in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively .

during the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swapmatured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid .

in may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swapmaturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) .

Answer: 3.0%

Question: what is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -3.6%

Answer: -3.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was 2017 gross margin percent?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 16.1%.

Rejected response: 18%.

Question: what was 2017 gross margin percent?

Answer: 16.1%

( dollars in millions ) the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2017 is $ 15191.5 ; the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2016 is $ 13981.9 ; the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2015 is $ 12988.7 ;

( dollars in millions ) the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2017 is 2449.9 ; the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2016 is 2327.2 ; the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2015 is 2115.8 ;

( dollars in millions ) the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2017 is 59.8 ; the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2016 is 55.0 ; the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2015 is 51.1 ;

Answer: 16.1%

Question: what was 2016 gross margin percent?

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 42%.

Rejected response: 3%.

FIS || what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 42%

currency the euro of 2012 is 27.1 ; the euro of 2011 is 26.4 ; the euro of 2010 is 18.6 ;

the impact on earnings of the foregoing assumed 10% ( 10 % ) change in each of the periods presented would not have been significant .

currency The total impact of 2012 is $ 90.3 ; The total impact of 2011 is $ 90.0 ; The total impact of 2010 is $ 62.7 ;

currency the total impact of 2012 is $ 90.3 ; the total impact of 2011 is $ 90.0 ; the total impact of 2010 is $ 62.7 ;

Answer: 42%

Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 3%

Answer: 3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2012 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 27%.

Rejected response: 25%.

GS || what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce <TIME> were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2012 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Answer: 27%

in millions the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2013 is 45826 ; the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is 46984 ;

in millions the total of average for theyear ended december 2013 is $ 182650 ; the total of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 172095 ;

the table below presents the fair value of the securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in our gce .

in millions the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2013 is $ 136824 ; the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 125111 ;

Answer: 27%

Question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2013 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Answer: 25%

Answer: 25%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses <TIME> are due to compensation and benefits?
Fixed answer: 49%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses <TIME> are due to compensation and benefits?' is 49%.

Rejected response: From 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses <TIME> are due to compensation and benefits?' is 49%.

GS || what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses <TIME> are due to compensation and benefits?

what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2013 are due to compensation and benefits?

Question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2013 are due to compensation and benefits?

Answer: 49%

$ in millions the compensation and benefits of as of december 2014 is $ 8368 ; the compensation and benefits of as of december 2013 is $ 7874 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2014 is $ 16075 ; the total of as of december 2013 is $ 16044 ;

other liabilities and accrued expenses the table below presents other liabilities and accrued expenses by type. .

$ in millions the accrued expenses and other of as of december 2014 is 4751 ; the accrued expenses and other of as of december 2013 is 5183 ;

Answer: 49%

Answer: 49%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 27%.

Rejected response: 29%.

FIS || what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be <TIME>?

Question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2017?

Answer: 27%

currency the euro of 2017 is 35 ; the euro of 2016 is 38 ; the euro of 2015 is 33 ;

currency the total increase or decrease of 2017 is $ 130 ; the total increase or decrease of 2016 is $ 129 ; the total increase or decrease of 2015 is $ 106 ;

a 10% ( 10 % ) move in average exchange rates for these currencies ( assuming a simultaneous and immediate 10% ( 10 % ) change in all of such rates for the relevant period ) would have resulted in the following increase or ( decrease ) in our reported revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in millions ) : .

dollar during these years compared to the preceding year .

Answer: 27%

Question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2016?

Answer: 29%

Answer: 29%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net sales from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.7%.

Rejected response: 13.1%.

BLL || what is the growth rate in net sales <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 13.7%

( $ in millions ) the net sales of 2011 is $ 8630.9 ; the net sales of 2010 is $ 7630.0 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 6710.4 ;

higher sales in 2010 compared to 2009 were due largely to sales associated with 2010 business acquisitions described above .

the higher net earnings from continuing operations in 2010 compared to 2009 included $ 105.9 million of equity gains on acquisitions associated with the acquisitions. .

( $ in millions ) the net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2011 is 444.0 ; the net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2010 is 468.0 ; the net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2009 is 387.9 ;

Answer: 13.7%

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 13.1%

( $ in millions ) The net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2011 is 444.0 ; The net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2010 is 468.0 ; The net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2009 is 387.9 ;

Answer: 13.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases from july 2 , 2005 to july 1 , 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-07-02 00:00:00 to 2006-07-02 00:00:00

Chosen response: 7%.

Rejected response: 9%.

SYY || what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases from july 2 , 2005 to july 1 , 2006?

Answer: 7%

total rental expense under operating leases was $ 100690000 , $ 92710000 , and $ 86842000 in fiscal 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .

the fair value of total long-term debt approximated $ 1669999000 at july 1 , 2006 and $ 1442721000 at july 2 , 2005 , respectively .

as of july 1 , 2006 and july 2 , 2005 , letters of credit outstanding were $ 60000000 and $ 76817000 , respectively .

Answer: 7%

Question: what was the percentage change in total rental expense under operating leases from july 1 , 2006 to july 2 , 2007?

Answer: 9%

Answer: 9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2002 compare to 2001?
Reference time interval: 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2003-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 12.0%.

Rejected response: -29.9%.

D || what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2002 compare to 2001?

Answer: 12.0%

rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense was $ 84 million , $ 75 million and $ 107 million for 2002 , 2001 , and 2000 , respectively .

substantially all of the value was attributed to the power pur- chase contracts which were terminated and resulted in a charge included in operation and maintenance expense .

the natural gas purchase com- mitments of dominion 2019s field services operations are also included , net of related sales commitments .

the table below reflects dominion 2019s minimum commitments as of december 31 , 2002 under these contracts. .

estimated payments under these commitments for the next five years are as follows : 2003 2014$ 599 million ; 2004 2014$ 311 million ; 2005 2014$ 253 million ; 2006 2014$ 205 mil- lion ; 2007 2014$ 89 million ; and years beyond 2007 2014$ 215 mil- lion .

Answer: 12.0%

Question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2001 compare to 2000?

Answer: -29.9%

capacity and other purchases under these contracts totaled $ 691 million , $ 680 million and $ 740 million for 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .

Answer: -29.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase from 2004 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 34.9%.

Rejected response: 62.3%.

MRO || by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase <TIME>?

Question: by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 34.9%

december 31 2003 the december 31 2004 of $ 438 is 527 ;

december 31 2003 the december 31 2005 of $ 438 is 711 ;

the following summarizes the total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations as if fin no .

Answer: 34.9%

Question: by what percentage did total amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations increase from 2003 to 2005?

Answer: 62.3%

47 , 2018 2018accounting for conditional asset retirement obligations 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no .

december 31 2003 the december 31 2003 of $ 438 is $ 438 ;

Answer: 62.3%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce <TIME> were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?
Fixed answer: 25%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce <TIME> were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?' is 25%.

Rejected response: From 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce <TIME> were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?' is 25%.

what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2013 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Question: what percentage of total average securities and certain overnight cash deposits that are included in gce during 2013 were non-u.s . dollar-denominated?

Answer: 25%

in millions the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2013 is $ 136824 ; the u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 125111 ;

in millions the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2013 is 45826 ; the non-u.s . dollar-denominated of average for theyear ended december 2012 is 46984 ;

in millions the total of average for theyear ended december 2013 is $ 182650 ; the total of average for theyear ended december 2012 is $ 172095 ;

Answer: 25%

Answer: 25%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 due in 2007 is attributable to total debt repayments?
Reference time interval: 2006-12-31 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 22%.

Rejected response: 18%.

IP || what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations <TIME> due <TIME> is attributable to total debt repayments?

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 due in 2007 is attributable to total debt repayments?

Answer: 22%

in millions the total debt ( a ) of 2007 is $ 692 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2008 is $ 129 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2009 is $ 1143 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2010 is $ 1198 ; the total debt ( a ) of 2011 is $ 381 ; the total debt ( a ) of thereafter is $ 3680 ;

in millions the total of 2007 is $ 3165 ; the total of 2008 is $ 708 ; the total of 2009 is $ 1599 ; the total of 2010 is $ 1624 ; the total of 2011 is $ 764 ; the total of thereafter is $ 5584 ;

contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 , were as follows : in millions 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter .

principal financial covenants include maintenance of a minimum net worth , defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock , plus any goodwill impairment charges , of $ 9 billion ; and a maximum total debt to capital ratio , defined as total debt divided by total debt plus net worth , of maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy .

Answer: 22%

Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2006 due in 2008 is attributable to total debt repayments?

Answer: 18%

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5%.

Rejected response: 10%.

JPM || what was the percentage change in loans retained <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 5%

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans retained of december 31 , 2014 is $ 324502 ; the loans retained of december 31 , 2013 is $ 308263 ; the loans retained of 2014 is $ 599 ; the loans retained of 2013 is $ 821 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) The loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2014 is 330914 ; The loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2013 is 321564 ; The loans 2013 reported of 2014 is 624 ; The loans 2013 reported of 2013 is 1044 ;

the firm distributes a significant percentage of the loans it originates into the market as part of its syndicated loan business and to manage portfolio concentrations and credit risk .

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2014 is 3801 ; the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2013 is 11290 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2014 is 4 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2013 is 26 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2014 is 330914 ; the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2013 is 321564 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2014 is 624 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2013 is 1044 ;

Answer: 5%

Question: what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 10%

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans retained of december 31 , 2012 is $ 306222 ; the loans retained of december 31 , 2011 is $ 278395 ; the loans retained of 2012 is $ 1434 ; the loans retained of 2011 is $ 2398 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) The loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2012 is 4406 ; The loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2011 is 2524 ; The loans held-for-sale of 2012 is 18 ; The loans held-for-sale of 2011 is 110 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) The loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2012 is 313183 ; The loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2011 is 283016 ; The loans 2013 reported of 2012 is 1545 ; The loans 2013 reported of 2011 is 2581 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2012 is 4406 ; the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2011 is 2524 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2012 is 18 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2011 is 110 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2012 is 313183 ; the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2011 is 283016 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2012 is 1545 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2011 is 2581 ;

Answer: 10%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what was the <TIME> tax expense?
Fixed answer: $ 129.60.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the <TIME> tax expense?' is $ 129.60.

Rejected response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the <TIME> tax expense?' is $ 129.60.

AAPL || what was the <TIME> tax expense?

Question: what was the 2005 tax expense?

Answer: $ 129.60

the provision for income taxes of 2006 is $ 829 ; the provision for income taxes of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 480 ; the provision for income taxes of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 104 ;

the effective tax rate of 2006 is 29% ( 29 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is 27% ( 27 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is 28% ( 28 % ) ;

The computed expected tax of 2006 is $ 987 ; The computed expected tax of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 633 ; The computed expected tax of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 129 ;

the computed expected tax of 2006 is $ 987 ; the computed expected tax of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 633 ; the computed expected tax of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 129 ;

Answer: $ 129.60

Answer: $ 129.60


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2013 to 2014?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3.6%.

Rejected response: 3.0%.

Question: what is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -3.6%

rent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements amounted to $ 132 million , $ 137 million and $ 133 million in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively .

Answer: -3.6%

Question: what is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 3.0%

Answer: 3.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation from 2014 to 2015 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2.

Rejected response: 1.

ZBH || what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation <TIME> in millions?

Question: what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation from 2014 to 2015 in millions?

Answer: -2

for the years ended december 31 , the total expense net of tax of 2015 is $ 31.9 ; the total expense net of tax of 2014 is $ 33.9 ; the total expense net of tax of 2013 is $ 32.9 ;

share-based compensation expense was as follows ( in millions ) : .

for the years ended december 31, The total expense pre-tax of 2015 is $ 46.4 ; The total expense pre-tax of 2014 is $ 49.4 ; The total expense pre-tax of 2013 is $ 48.5 ;

for the years ended december 31, the total expense pre-tax of 2015 is $ 46.4 ; the total expense pre-tax of 2014 is $ 49.4 ; the total expense pre-tax of 2013 is $ 48.5 ;

for the years ended december 31, the total expense net of tax of 2015 is $ 31.9 ; the total expense net of tax of 2014 is $ 33.9 ; the total expense net of tax of 2013 is $ 32.9 ;

we have registered 57.9 million shares of common stock under these plans .

Answer: -2

Question: what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation from 2013 to 2014 in millions?

Answer: 1

Answer: 1


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 7%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers <TIME>?' is 7%.

Rejected response: From 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers <TIME>?' is 7%.

IP || brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers <TIME>?

brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2006?

Question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2006?

Answer: 7%

in millions the sales of 2006 is $ 6930 ; the sales of 2005 is $ 7170 ; the sales of 2004 is $ 7135 ;

brazil ian paper net sales for 2006 of $ 496 mil- lion were higher than the $ 465 million in 2005 and the $ 417 million in 2004 .

printing papers in millions 2006 2005 2004 .

in millions the operating profit of 2006 is $ 677 ; the operating profit of 2005 is $ 473 ; the operating profit of 2004 is $ 508 ;

Answer: 7%

Answer: 7%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of average equity from 2009 to 2010?
Reference time interval: 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2011-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1224.

Rejected response: 889.

UNP || what was the change in millions of average equity <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in millions of average equity from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 1224

millions except percentages the average equity of 2011 is $ 18171 ; the average equity of 2010 is $ 17282 ; the average equity of 2009 is $ 16058 ;

return on average common shareholders 2019 equity millions , except percentages 2011 2010 2009 .

millions except percentages The return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2011 is 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) ; The return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2010 is 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ; The return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2009 is 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) ;

millions except percentages the return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2011 is 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) ; the return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2010 is 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ; the return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2009 is 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) ;

Answer: 1224

Question: what was the change in millions of average equity from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 889

Answer: 889


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what was the percentage change in loans retained <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 10%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the percentage change in loans retained <TIME>?' is 10%.

Rejected response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the percentage change in loans retained <TIME>?' is 10%.

what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2011 to 2012?

Question: what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 10%

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans retained of december 31 , 2012 is $ 306222 ; the loans retained of december 31 , 2011 is $ 278395 ; the loans retained of 2012 is $ 1434 ; the loans retained of 2011 is $ 2398 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2012 is 4406 ; the loans held-for-sale of december 31 , 2011 is 2524 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2012 is 18 ; the loans held-for-sale of 2011 is 110 ;

december 31 , ( in millions ) the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2012 is 313183 ; the loans 2013 reported of december 31 , 2011 is 283016 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2012 is 1545 ; the loans 2013 reported of 2011 is 2581 ;

Answer: 10%

Answer: 10%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between <TIME> to <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -21.0%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between <TIME> to <TIME>?' is -21.0%.

Rejected response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between <TIME> to <TIME>?' is -21.0%.

ABMD || what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between <TIME> to <TIME>?

what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2006 to 2007?

Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -21.0%

the weighted average grant-date fair value for options granted during fiscal years 2005 , 2006 , and 2007 was $ 8.05 , $ 6.91 , and $ 8.75 per share , respectively .

the fair value of options granted during the fiscal years 2005 , 2006 and 2007 were calculated using the following weighted average assumptions: .

the calculation of the fair value of the options is net of estimated forfeitures .

the remaining unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for unvested stock option awards at march 31 , 2007 was approximately $ 9.0 million , net of forfeitures , and the weighted average time over which this cost will be recognized is 1.9 years .

Answer: -21.0%

Answer: -21.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2011 to 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -3.6%.

Rejected response: -7.8%.

LMT || what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -3.6%

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2012 is 323.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2011 is 335.9 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2010 is 364.2 ;

The weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2012 is 328.4 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2011 is 339.9 ; The weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2010 is 368.3 ;

we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2012 is 328.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2011 is 339.9 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2010 is 368.3 ;

the computation of diluted earnings per common share excluded 8.0 million , 13.4 million , and 14.7 million stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive , primarily due to their exercise prices exceeding the average market price of our common stock during each respective reporting period .

Answer: -3.6%

Question: what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: -7.8%

Answer: -7.8%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 77.1.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock <TIME>?' is 77.1.

Rejected response: From 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock <TIME>?' is 77.1.

AWK || at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock <TIME>?

at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2017?

Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2017?

Answer: 77.1

the company repurchased 0.6 million shares and 0.7 million shares of common stock in the open market at an aggregate cost of $ 45 million and $ 54 million under this program for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .

anti-dilutive stock repurchase program in february 2015 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized an anti-dilutive stock repurchase program , which allowed the company to purchase up to 10 million shares of its outstanding common stock over an unrestricted period of time .

as of december 31 , 2018 , there were 5.5 million shares of common stock available for purchase under the program. .

Answer: 77.1

Answer: 77.1


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue <TIME> was do to interest rate risks?
Fixed answer: 57%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total principal transactions revenue <TIME> was do to interest rate risks?' is 57%.

Rejected response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total principal transactions revenue <TIME> was do to interest rate risks?' is 57%.

C || what percentage of total principal transactions revenue <TIME> was do to interest rate risks?

what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2018 was do to interest rate risks?

Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2018 was do to interest rate risks?

Answer: 57%

in millions of dollars the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2018 is $ 5186 ; the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2017 is $ 5301 ; the interest rate risks ( 1 ) of 2016 is $ 4229 ;

in millions of dollars the total of 2018 is $ 9062 ; the total of 2017 is $ 9475 ; the total of 2016 is $ 7857 ;

the following table presents principal transactions revenue: .

( 5 ) includes revenues from structured credit products. .

Answer: 57%

Answer: 57%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 3.30%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate <TIME>?' is 3.30%.

Rejected response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate <TIME>?' is 3.30%.

MRO || what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate <TIME>?

what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2017?

Question: what is the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate health care trend rate in 2017?

Answer: 3.30%

the initial health care trend rate of 2017 is 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) ; the initial health care trend rate of 2016 is 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) ; the initial health care trend rate of 2015 is 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) ;

the ultimate trend rate of 2017 is 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ; the ultimate trend rate of 2016 is 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ; the ultimate trend rate of 2015 is 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ;

The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2017 is 2025 ; The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2016 is 2025 ; The year ultimate trend rate is reached of 2015 is 2024 ;

Answer: 3.30%

Answer: 3.30%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 45%.

Rejected response: 46%.

JPM || what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2013?

Answer: 45%

( in millions ) the net interest income of 2014 is 43634 ; the net interest income of 2013 is 43319 ; the net interest income of 2012 is 44910 ;

( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2014 is $ 94205 ; the total net revenue of 2013 is $ 96606 ; the total net revenue of 2012 is $ 97031 ;

2014 compared with 2013 total net revenue for 2014 was down by $ 2.4 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared with the prior year , predominantly due to lower mortgage fees and related income , and lower other income .

Answer: 45%

Question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2014?

Answer: 46%

Answer: 46%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , <TIME>?\\n
Fixed answer: 117624.84.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , <TIME>?\\n' is 117624.84.

Rejected response: From 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , <TIME>?\\n' is 117624.84.

GPN || what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , <TIME>?\\n

what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2018?\\n

Question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2018?\\n

Answer: 117624.84

Explanation: this gives us the potential compensation look for the net granting activity at year end .

the unvested at december 31 2018 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1084 ; the unvested at december 31 2018 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 108.51 ;

The unvested at december 31 2016 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1263 ; The unvested at december 31 2016 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 49.55 ;

The unvested at december 31 2017 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1226 ; The unvested at december 31 2017 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 78.29 ;

the unvested at december 31 2016 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1263 ; the unvested at december 31 2016 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 49.55 ;

the unvested at december 31 2017 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1226 ; the unvested at december 31 2017 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 78.29 ;

Answer: 117624.84

Answer: 117624.84


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of <TIME> to the end of <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -530.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of <TIME> to the end of <TIME>?' is -530.

Rejected response: From 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of <TIME> to the end of <TIME>?' is -530.

CMCSA || what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of <TIME> to the end of <TIME>?

what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2013 to the end of 2014?

Question: what was the change in unrecognized tax benefits from the end of 2013 to the end of 2014?

Answer: -530

( in millions ) the balance december 31 of 2015 is $ 1136 ; the balance december 31 of 2014 is $ 1171 ; the balance december 31 of 2013 is $ 1701 ;

reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits .

uncertain tax positions our uncertain tax positions as of december 31 , 2015 totaled $ 1.1 billion , which exclude the federal benefits on state tax positions that were recorded as deferred income taxes .

( in millions ) the balance january 1 of 2015 is $ 1171 ; the balance january 1 of 2014 is $ 1701 ; the balance january 1 of 2013 is $ 1573 ;

( in millions ) the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2015 is -84 ( 84 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2014 is -220 ( 220 ) ; the reductions for tax positions of prior years of 2013 is -141 ( 141 ) ;

Answer: -530

Answer: -530


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -1.9.

Rejected response: -4.1.

LMT || what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -1.9

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2014 is 316.8 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2013 is 320.9 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2012 is 323.7 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2014 is 322.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2013 is 326.5 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2012 is 328.4 ;

the computation of diluted earnings per common share excluded 2.4 million and 8.0 million stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive , primarily due to their exercise prices exceeding the average market prices of our common stock during the respective periods .

Answer: -1.9

Question: what was the change in millions of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: -4.1

the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding interest rate swaps at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 was $ 1.3 billion and $ 1.2 billion .

Answer: -4.1


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees from 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 35.8%.

Rejected response: 63.1%.

AMT || what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 35.8%

during the 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , offering periods , employees purchased 48886 , 53210 and 50119 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 33.93 , $ 24.98 and $ 15.32 , respectively .

the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 were $ 9.09 , $ 6.79 and $ 5.15 , respectively .

The weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2007 is 5.02% ( 5.02 % ) ; The weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2006 is 5.08% ( 5.08 % ) ; The weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2005 is 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) ;

the expected life of the shares of 2007 is 6 months ; the expected life of the shares of 2006 is 6 months ; the expected life of the shares of 2005 is 6 months ;

Answer: 35.8%

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 63.1%

employees may purchase shares having a value not exceeding 15% ( 15 % ) of their gross compensation during an offering period and may not purchase more than $ 25000 worth of stock in a calendar year ( based on market values at the beginning of each offering period ) .

Answer: 63.1%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -1574.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability <TIME>?' is -1574.

Rejected response: From 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability <TIME>?' is -1574.

AMT || what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability <TIME>?

what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2004?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of employee separations liability during 2004?

Answer: -1574

the employee separations of liability as of january 1 2004 is $ 2239 ; the employee separations of 2004 expense is $ 823 ; the employee separations of 2004 cash payments is $ -2397 ( 2397 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 665 ; the employee separations of 2005 expense is $ 84 ; the employee separations of 2005 cash payments is $ -448 ( 448 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 301 ; the employee separations of 2006 expense is $ -267 ( 267 ) ; the employee separations of 2006 cash payments is $ -34 ( 34 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2006 is $ 0 ;

the accrued restructuring liability is reflected in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2005 .

restructuring expense 2014the following table displays activity with respect to the accrued restructuring liability for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 ( in thousands ) : liability as of january 1 , expense payments liability december 31 , expense payments liability december 31 , expense payments liability december 31 .

the total of liability as of january 1 2004 is $ 3689 ; the total of 2004 expense is $ 692 ; the total of 2004 cash payments is $ -3285 ( 3285 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 1096 ; the total of 2005 expense is $ 96 ; the total of 2005 cash payments is $ -773 ( 773 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 419 ; the total of 2006 expense is $ -277 ( 277 ) ; the total of 2006 cash payments is $ -142 ( 142 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2006 is $ 0 ;

Answer: -1574

Answer: -1574


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what was <TIME> gross margin percent?
Fixed answer: 16.1%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was <TIME> gross margin percent?' is 16.1%.

Rejected response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was <TIME> gross margin percent?' is 16.1%.

CDW || what was <TIME> gross margin percent?

Question: what was 2017 gross margin percent?

Answer: 16.1%

( dollars in millions ) the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2017 is $ 15191.5 ; the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2016 is $ 13981.9 ; the net sales of years ended december 31 , 2015 is $ 12988.7 ;

( dollars in millions ) the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2017 is 2449.9 ; the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2016 is 2327.2 ; the gross profit of years ended december 31 , 2015 is 2115.8 ;

( dollars in millions ) the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2017 is 59.8 ; the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2016 is 55.0 ; the average daily sales of years ended december 31 , 2015 is 51.1 ;

Answer: 16.1%

Answer: 16.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate from 2003 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -12.3%.

Rejected response: 51.2%.

ABMD || what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: -12.3%

the risk-free interest rate of 2003 is 2.92% ( 2.92 % ) ; the risk-free interest rate of 2004 is 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) ; the risk-free interest rate of 2005 is 3.87% ( 3.87 % ) ;

in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no .

in april 2005 , the the fair value per share of the options granted during fiscal 2003 , 2004 and 2005 was computed as $ 1.69 , $ 1.53 and $ 3.94 , per share , respectively , and was calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions. .

2005 annual report : financials page 15 notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 march 31 , 2005 in addition to compensation expense related to stock option grants , the pro forma compensation expense shown in the table above includes compensation expense related to stock issued under the company 2019s employee stock purchase plan of approximately $ 44000 , $ 19000 and $ 28000 for fiscal 2003 , 2004 and 2005 , respectively .

Answer: -12.3%

Question: what is the percentage change in the risk-free rate from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: 51.2%

Answer: 51.2%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2004 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 21.5%.

Rejected response: -37.0%.

L || what is the return on investment for s&p500 <TIME>?

Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2004 to 2006?

Answer: 21.5%

subtract(121.48, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2004 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2009 .

the loews common stock of 2004 is 100.00 ; the loews common stock of 2005 is 135.92 ; the loews common stock of 2006 is 179.47 ; the loews common stock of 2007 is 219.01 ; the loews common stock of 2008 is 123.70 ; the loews common stock of 2009 is 160.62 ;

the loews peer group ( a ) of 2004 is 100.00 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2005 is 133.59 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2006 is 152.24 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2007 is 174.46 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2008 is 106.30 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2009 is 136.35 ;

Answer: 21.5%

Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: -37.0%

Answer: -37.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2006 to 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -21.0%.

Rejected response: 16.5%.

Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -21.0%

the fair value of options granted during the fiscal years 2005 , 2006 and 2007 were calculated using the following weighted average assumptions: .

the weighted average grant-date fair value for options granted during fiscal years 2005 , 2006 , and 2007 was $ 8.05 , $ 6.91 , and $ 8.75 per share , respectively .

the remaining unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for unvested stock option awards at march 31 , 2007 was approximately $ 9.0 million , net of forfeitures , and the weighted average time over which this cost will be recognized is 1.9 years .

Answer: -21.0%

Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 16.5%

Answer: 16.5%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -2.1%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in operating expenses <TIME>?' is -2.1%.

Rejected response: From 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in operating expenses <TIME>?' is -2.1%.

GS || what is the growth rate in operating expenses <TIME>?

what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2013?

Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2013?

Answer: -2.1%

$ in millions the total operating expenses of year ended december 2014 is $ 22171 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2013 is $ 22469 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2012 is $ 22956 ;

operating expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 22.17 billion for 2014 , essentially unchanged compared with 2013 .

operating expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 22.47 billion for 2013 , 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2012 .

Answer: -2.1%

Answer: -2.1%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense <TIME> compare to <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 12.0%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2002-01-01 00:00:00 to 2003-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense <TIME> compare to <TIME>?' is 12.0%.

Rejected response: From 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense <TIME> compare to <TIME>?' is 12.0%.

D || what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2002 compare to 2001?

Question: what is the growth rate in rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense in 2002 compare to 2001?

Answer: 12.0%

the table below reflects dominion 2019s minimum commitments as of december 31 , 2002 under these contracts. .

estimated payments under these commitments for the next five years are as follows : 2003 2014$ 599 million ; 2004 2014$ 311 million ; 2005 2014$ 253 million ; 2006 2014$ 205 mil- lion ; 2007 2014$ 89 million ; and years beyond 2007 2014$ 215 mil- lion .

rental expense included in other operations and maintenance expense was $ 84 million , $ 75 million and $ 107 million for 2002 , 2001 , and 2000 , respectively .

Answer: 12.0%

Answer: 12.0%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 56.5%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment <TIME>?' is 56.5%.

Rejected response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment <TIME>?' is 56.5%.

MO || what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment <TIME>?

what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment during 2014?

Question: what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment during 2014?

Answer: 56.5%

( cans and packs in millions ) the copenhagen of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2014 is 448.6 ; the copenhagen of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2013 is 426.1 ; the copenhagen of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012 is 392.5 ;

( cans and packs in millions ) the total smokeless products of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2014 is 793.3 ; the total smokeless products of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2013 is 787.5 ; the total smokeless products of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012 is 763.3 ;

smokeless products segment during 2014 , the smokeless products segment grew operating companies income and expanded operating companies income margins .

( cans and packs in millions ) the copenhagenandskoal of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2014 is 718.2 ; the copenhagenandskoal of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2013 is 709.9 ; the copenhagenandskoal of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012 is 680.9 ;

Answer: 56.5%

Answer: 56.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2015 to 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 26%.

Rejected response: 13%.

LKQ || what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 26%

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 211.5 million , $ 168.4 million and $ 148.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment .

had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2016 , our portion of the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 59.0 million .

the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Answer: 26%

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 13%

we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .

Answer: 13%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 29%.

Rejected response: 27%.

FIS || what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be <TIME>?

Question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2016?

Answer: 29%

currency the euro of 2017 is 35 ; the euro of 2016 is 38 ; the euro of 2015 is 33 ;

currency the total increase or decrease of 2017 is $ 130 ; the total increase or decrease of 2016 is $ 129 ; the total increase or decrease of 2015 is $ 106 ;

dollar during these years compared to the preceding year .

Answer: 29%

Question: what percent of the total increase or decrease would the euro be in 2017?

Answer: 27%

Answer: 27%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2013 are due to compensation and benefits?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 49%.

Rejected response: 52%.

GS || what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses <TIME> are due to compensation and benefits?

Question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2013 are due to compensation and benefits?

Answer: 49%

$ in millions the compensation and benefits of as of december 2014 is $ 8368 ; the compensation and benefits of as of december 2013 is $ 7874 ;

$ in millions the accrued expenses and other of as of december 2014 is 4751 ; the accrued expenses and other of as of december 2013 is 5183 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2014 is $ 16075 ; the total of as of december 2013 is $ 16044 ;

Answer: 49%

Question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2014 are due to compensation and benefits?

Answer: 52%

Answer: 52%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 54.1%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment <TIME>?' is 54.1%.

Rejected response: From 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment <TIME>?' is 54.1%.

what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment during 2013?

Question: what portion of total smokeless products shipments are related to copenhagen segment during 2013?

Answer: 54.1%

( cans and packs in millions ) the copenhagen of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2014 is 448.6 ; the copenhagen of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2013 is 426.1 ; the copenhagen of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012 is 392.5 ;

( cans and packs in millions ) the copenhagenandskoal of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2014 is 718.2 ; the copenhagenandskoal of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2013 is 709.9 ; the copenhagenandskoal of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012 is 680.9 ;

( cans and packs in millions ) the total smokeless products of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2014 is 793.3 ; the total smokeless products of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2013 is 787.5 ; the total smokeless products of shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012 is 763.3 ;

Answer: 54.1%

Answer: 54.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2012 to 2013?
Reference time interval: 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 18.2%.

Rejected response: 32.3%.

AMT || what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: 18.2%

such payments at december 31 , 2014 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .

aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 approximated $ 655.0 million , $ 495.2 million and $ 419.0 million , respectively. .

Answer: 18.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in aggregate rent expense from 2013 to 2014?

Answer: 32.3%

Answer: 32.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses from 2003 to 2004?
Reference time interval: 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -7.3%.

Rejected response: -5.1%.

AMT || what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: -7.3%

as a result , the company recorded impairment charges and net losses of approximately $ 16.8 million , $ 17.7 million and $ 19.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 , respectively .

2022 non-core asset impairment charges 2014during the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 respectively , the company sold a limited number of non-core towers and other non-core assets and recorded impairment charges to write-down these and other non-core assets to net realizable value .

such charges are reflected in impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 .

impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense the significant components reflected in impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations include the following : impairments and net loss on sale of long-lived assets 2014during the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 , the company recorded impairments and net loss on sale of long-lived assets ( primarily related to its rental and management segment ) of $ 19.1 million , $ 22.3 million and $ 28.3 million , respectively .

during the year ended december 31 , 2003 , the company sold approximately 300 non-core towers and certain other non-core assets and recorded impairment charges to write-down these and other non-core assets to net realizable value .

Answer: -7.3%

Question: what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: -5.1%

the total of liability as of january 1 2003 is $ 3632 ; the total of 2003 restructuring expense is $ 2266 ; the total of 2003 cash payments is $ -2209 ( 2209 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2003 is $ 3689 ; the total of 2004 restructuring expense is $ 692 ; the total of 2004 cash payments is $ -3285 ( 3285 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 1096 ; the total of 2005 restructuring expense is $ 96 ; the total of 2005 cash payments is $ -773 ( 773 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 419 ;

Answer: -5.1%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2020?
Reference time interval: 2020-01-01 00:00:00 to 2021-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 17%.

Rejected response: 18%.

UNP || what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due <TIME>?

Question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2020?

Answer: 17%

millions the 2020 of operatingleases is 378 ; the 2020 of capitalleases is 155 ;

millions the total minimum lease payments of operatingleases is $ 2646 ; the total minimum lease payments of capitalleases is $ 898 ;

future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2018 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases .

millions the 2019 of operatingleases is $ 419 ; the 2019 of capitalleases is $ 148 ;

Answer: 17%

Question: what percent of total minimum capital leases payments are due in 2021?

Answer: 18%

millions the 2021 of operatingleases is 303 ; the 2021 of capitalleases is 159 ;

millions the present value of minimum lease payments of operatingleases is n/a ; the present value of minimum lease payments of capitalleases is $ 754 ;

Answer: 18%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , <TIME> are due <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 6%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2012-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , <TIME> are due <TIME>?' is 6%.

Rejected response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , <TIME> are due <TIME>?' is 6%.

UPS || what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , <TIME> are due <TIME>?

what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2012?

Question: what percentage of total expected cash outflow to satisfy contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 are due in 2012?

Answer: 6%

commitment type the total of 2011 is $ 2944 ; the total of 2012 is $ 1334 ; the total of 2013 is $ 3515 ; the total of 2014 is $ 2059 ; the total of 2015 is $ 820 ; the total of after 2016 is $ 12884 ; the total of total is $ 23556 ;

the following table summarizes the expected cash outflow to satisfy our contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2010 ( in millions ) : .

contractual commitments we have contractual obligations and commitments in the form of capital leases , operating leases , debt obligations , purchase commitments , and certain other liabilities .

commitment type the debt principal of 2011 is 345 ; the debt principal of 2012 is 2014 ; the debt principal of 2013 is 1750 ; the debt principal of 2014 is 1000 ; the debt principal of 2015 is 100 ; the debt principal of after 2016 is 7363 ; the debt principal of total is 10558 ;

the table above does not include approximately $ 284 million of liabilities for .

Answer: 6%

Answer: 6%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the net income per common share <TIME>?
Fixed answer: .385.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net income per common share <TIME>?' is .385.

Rejected response: From 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net income per common share <TIME>?' is .385.

DRE || what is the net income per common share <TIME>?

what is the net income per common share in 2008?

Question: what is the net income per common share in 2008?

Answer: .385

the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2008 is $ 56616 ; the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2007 is $ 217692 ; the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2006 is $ 145095 ;

the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2008 is 146915 ; the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2007 is 139255 ; the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2006 is 134883 ;

unbilled receivables on construction contracts totaled $ 22.7 million and $ 33.1 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

the specific timing of the sale is measured against various criteria in sfas 66 related to the terms of the transactions and any continuing involvement in the form of management or financial assistance from the seller associated with the properties .

the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2008 is $ 59584 ; the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2007 is $ 232091 ; the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2006 is $ 159333 ;

Answer: .385

Answer: .385


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 36%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently <TIME>?' is 36%.

Rejected response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently <TIME>?' is 36%.

PKG || what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently <TIME>?

what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2007?

Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments for energy are currently in 2007?

Answer: 36%

total purchase commitments over the next two years are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

Answer: 36%

Answer: 36%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2014 are due to compensation and benefits?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 52%.

Rejected response: 49%.

Question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2014 are due to compensation and benefits?

Answer: 52%

$ in millions the compensation and benefits of as of december 2014 is $ 8368 ; the compensation and benefits of as of december 2013 is $ 7874 ;

$ in millions the accrued expenses and other of as of december 2014 is 4751 ; the accrued expenses and other of as of december 2013 is 5183 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2014 is $ 16075 ; the total of as of december 2013 is $ 16044 ;

Answer: 52%

Question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2013 are due to compensation and benefits?

Answer: 49%

Answer: 49%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net change in cash during 2015?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 296.

Rejected response: -312.

BKR || what is the net change in cash <TIME>?

Question: what is the net change in cash during 2015?

Answer: 296

( in millions ) the operating activities of 2017 is $ -799 ( 799 ) ; the operating activities of 2016 is $ 262 ; the operating activities of 2015 is $ 1277 ;

( in millions ) the investing activities of 2017 is -4130 ( 4130 ) ; the investing activities of 2016 is -472 ( 472 ) ; the investing activities of 2015 is -466 ( 466 ) ;

( in millions ) the financing activities of 2017 is 10919 ; the financing activities of 2016 is -102 ( 102 ) ; the financing activities of 2015 is -515 ( 515 ) ;

at december 31 , 2017 , we had cash and equivalents of $ 7.0 billion compared to $ 981 million of cash and equivalents at december 31 , 2016 .

cash flows cash flows provided by ( used in ) each type of activity were as follows for the years ended december 31: .

Answer: 296

Question: what is the net change in cash during 2016?

Answer: -312

Answer: -312


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 21.5%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the return on investment for s&p500 <TIME>?' is 21.5%.

Rejected response: From 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the return on investment for s&p500 <TIME>?' is 21.5%.

Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2004 to 2006?

Answer: 21.5%

subtract(121.48, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)

the loews common stock of 2004 is 100.00 ; the loews common stock of 2005 is 135.92 ; the loews common stock of 2006 is 179.47 ; the loews common stock of 2007 is 219.01 ; the loews common stock of 2008 is 123.70 ; the loews common stock of 2009 is 160.62 ;

the loews peer group ( a ) of 2004 is 100.00 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2005 is 133.59 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2006 is 152.24 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2007 is 174.46 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2008 is 106.30 ; the loews peer group ( a ) of 2009 is 136.35 ;

Answer: 21.5%

Answer: 21.5%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the 2006 tax expense?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: $ 240.41.

Rejected response: $ 129.60.

AAPL || what was the <TIME> tax expense?

Question: what was the 2006 tax expense?

Answer: $ 240.41

the computed expected tax of 2006 is $ 987 ; the computed expected tax of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 633 ; the computed expected tax of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 129 ;

the provision for income taxes of 2006 is $ 829 ; the provision for income taxes of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 480 ; the provision for income taxes of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is $ 104 ;

the effective tax rate of 2006 is 29% ( 29 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2005 as restated ( 1 ) is 27% ( 27 % ) ; the effective tax rate of 2004 as restated ( 1 ) is 28% ( 28 % ) ;

Answer: $ 240.41

Question: what was the 2005 tax expense?

Answer: $ 129.60

Answer: $ 129.60


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 45%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income <TIME>?' is 45%.

Rejected response: From 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income <TIME>?' is 45%.

JPM || what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income <TIME>?

what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2013?

Question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2013?

Answer: 45%

( in millions ) the net interest income of 2014 is 43634 ; the net interest income of 2013 is 43319 ; the net interest income of 2012 is 44910 ;

( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2014 is $ 94205 ; the total net revenue of 2013 is $ 96606 ; the total net revenue of 2012 is $ 97031 ;

2014 compared with 2013 total net revenue for 2014 was down by $ 2.4 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared with the prior year , predominantly due to lower mortgage fees and related income , and lower other income .

Answer: 45%

Answer: 45%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , <TIME>?\\n
Fixed answer: 95983.54.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , <TIME>?\\n' is 95983.54.

Rejected response: From 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , <TIME>?\\n' is 95983.54.

GPN || what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , <TIME>?\\n

what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2017?\\n

Question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2017?\\n

Answer: 95983.54

the unvested at december 31 2017 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1226 ; the unvested at december 31 2017 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 78.29 ;

The unvested at december 31 2018 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1084 ; The unvested at december 31 2018 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 108.51 ;

the unvested at december 31 2016 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1263 ; the unvested at december 31 2016 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 49.55 ;

the unvested at december 31 2018 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1084 ; the unvested at december 31 2018 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 108.51 ;

Answer: 95983.54

Answer: 95983.54


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -7.8%.

Rejected response: -3.6%.

LMT || what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: -7.8%

the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2012 is 323.7 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2011 is 335.9 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations of 2010 is 364.2 ;

the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2012 is 328.4 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2011 is 339.9 ; the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations of 2010 is 368.3 ;

the computation of diluted earnings per common share excluded 8.0 million , 13.4 million , and 14.7 million stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive , primarily due to their exercise prices exceeding the average market price of our common stock during each respective reporting period .

Answer: -7.8%

Question: what is the percentage change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: -3.6%

Answer: -3.6%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 30%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses <TIME>?' is 30%.

Rejected response: From 2009-01-01 00:00:00 to 2010-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses <TIME>?' is 30%.

C || what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses <TIME>?

what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2008?

Question: what percent of net interest revenue where total operating expenses in 2008?

Answer: 30%

in millions of dollars the net interest revenue of 2009 is $ 3173 ; the net interest revenue of 2008 is $ 3332 ; the net interest revenue of 2007 is $ 2723 ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 5 ) % ( % ) ; the net interest revenue of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is 22% ( 22 % ) ;

in millions of dollars the total operating expenses of 2009 is $ 896 ; the total operating expenses of 2008 is $ 988 ; the total operating expenses of 2007 is $ 1070 ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is ( 9 ) % ( % ) ; the total operating expenses of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is ( 8 ) % ( % ) ;

operating expenses decreased 8% ( 8 % ) , mainly driven by lower compensation and transaction expenses .

in millions of dollars the revenues net of interest expense of 2009 is $ -3682 ( 3682 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2008 is $ -39574 ( 39574 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of 2007 is $ -17896 ( 17896 ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 is 91% ( 91 % ) ; the revenues net of interest expense of % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 is nm ;

Answer: 30%

Answer: 30%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 46%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income <TIME>?' is 46%.

Rejected response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income <TIME>?' is 46%.

what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2014?

Question: what percentage of total net revenue was due to net interest income in 2014?

Answer: 46%

( in millions ) the net interest income of 2014 is 43634 ; the net interest income of 2013 is 43319 ; the net interest income of 2012 is 44910 ;

( in millions ) the total net revenue of 2014 is $ 94205 ; the total net revenue of 2013 is $ 96606 ; the total net revenue of 2012 is $ 97031 ;

2014 compared with 2013 total net revenue for 2014 was down by $ 2.4 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared with the prior year , predominantly due to lower mortgage fees and related income , and lower other income .

Answer: 46%

Answer: 46%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2018?
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 75.00.

Rejected response: 77.1.

AWK || at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock <TIME>?

Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2018?

Answer: 75.00

the company repurchased 0.6 million shares and 0.7 million shares of common stock in the open market at an aggregate cost of $ 45 million and $ 54 million under this program for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .

Answer: 75.00

Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2017?

Answer: 77.1

Answer: 77.1


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 63.0%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2003-01-01 00:00:00 to 2004-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool <TIME>?' is 63.0%.

Rejected response: From 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2005-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool <TIME>?' is 63.0%.

ETR || what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool <TIME>?

what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2003?

Question: what is the money pool activity use of operating cash flows as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2003?

Answer: 63.0%

system energy's receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

money pool activity used $ 42.5 million of system energy's operating cash flows in 2004 , used $ 12.0 million in 2003 , and provided $ 6.8 million in 2002 .

Answer: 63.0%

Answer: 63.0%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees from 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 63.1%.

Rejected response: 35.8%.

AMT || what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees from 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 63.1%

employees may purchase shares having a value not exceeding 15% ( 15 % ) of their gross compensation during an offering period and may not purchase more than $ 25000 worth of stock in a calendar year ( based on market values at the beginning of each offering period ) .

during the 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , offering periods , employees purchased 48886 , 53210 and 50119 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 33.93 , $ 24.98 and $ 15.32 , respectively .

the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 were $ 9.09 , $ 6.79 and $ 5.15 , respectively .

Answer: 63.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares purchased by employees from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: 35.8%

the expected life of the shares of 2007 is 6 months ; the expected life of the shares of 2006 is 6 months ; the expected life of the shares of 2005 is 6 months ;

Answer: 35.8%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2013?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -2.1%.

Rejected response: -1.3%.

GS || what is the growth rate in operating expenses <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2013?

Answer: -2.1%

$ in millions the total operating expenses of year ended december 2014 is $ 22171 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2013 is $ 22469 ; the total operating expenses of year ended december 2012 is $ 22956 ;

operating expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 22.17 billion for 2014 , essentially unchanged compared with 2013 .

operating expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 22.47 billion for 2013 , 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2012 .

Answer: -2.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in operating expenses in 2014?

Answer: -1.3%

Answer: -1.3%