Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: <TIME> what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income
Fixed answer: 9.9%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question '<TIME> what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income' is 9.9%.

Rejected response: From 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question '<TIME> what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income' is 9.9%.

JPM || <TIME> what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

in 2017 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

Question: in 2017 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

Answer: 9.9%

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2018 is 3087 ; the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2017 is 4630 ; the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2016 is 6334 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2018 is $ 52600 ; the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2017 is $ 46780 ; the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2016 is $ 40958 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) The net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2018 is $ 55687 ; The net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2017 is $ 51410 ; The net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2016 is $ 47292 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2018 is $ 55687 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2017 is $ 51410 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2016 is $ 47292 ;

Answer: 9.9%

Answer: 9.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in net sales from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13.1%.

Rejected response: 13.7%.

BLL || what is the growth rate in net sales <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 13.1%

( $ in millions ) the net sales of 2011 is $ 8630.9 ; the net sales of 2010 is $ 7630.0 ; the net sales of 2009 is $ 6710.4 ;

higher sales in 2010 compared to 2009 were due largely to sales associated with 2010 business acquisitions described above .

( $ in millions ) The net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2011 is 444.0 ; The net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2010 is 468.0 ; The net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2009 is 387.9 ;

( $ in millions ) the net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2011 is 444.0 ; the net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2010 is 468.0 ; the net earnings attributable to ball corporation of 2009 is 387.9 ;

Answer: 13.1%

Question: what is the growth rate in net sales from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 13.7%

the higher net earnings from continuing operations in 2010 compared to 2009 included $ 105.9 million of equity gains on acquisitions associated with the acquisitions. .

Answer: 13.7%

Constructed heuristically from grouped FinQA questions after replacing time expressions with <TIME>.


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2016?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10.6%.

Rejected response: 21.3%.

ECL || what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate <TIME>?

Question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2016?

Answer: 10.6%

the statutory u.s . rate of 2017 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . rate of 2016 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . rate of 2015 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ;

the effective income tax rate of 2017 is 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) ; the effective income tax rate of 2016 is 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) ; the effective income tax rate of 2015 is 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) ;

federal income tax rate to the company 2019s effective income tax rate is as follows: .

the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2017 is 0.4 ; the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2016 is 0.9 ; the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2015 is 0.4 ;

Answer: 10.6%

Question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2017?

Answer: 21.3%

Answer: 21.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share between 2015 and 2016?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 2%.

Rejected response: 12%.

GS || what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share between 2015 and 2016?

Answer: 2%

dividends declared per common share were $ 2.90 in 2017 , $ 2.60 in 2016 and $ 2.55 in 2015 .

in millions except per share amounts The common share repurchases of year ended december 2017 is 29.0 ; The common share repurchases of year ended december 2016 is 36.6 ; The common share repurchases of year ended december 2015 is 22.1 ;

( board ) declared a dividend of $ 0.75 per common share to be paid on march 29 , 2018 to common shareholders of record on march 1 , 2018 .

the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program. .

Answer: 2%

Question: what was the percentage change in dividends declared per common share between 2016 and 2017?

Answer: 12%

Answer: 12%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses <TIME> are due to compensation and benefits?
Fixed answer: 52%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses <TIME> are due to compensation and benefits?' is 52%.

Rejected response: From 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2014-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses <TIME> are due to compensation and benefits?' is 52%.

GS || what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses <TIME> are due to compensation and benefits?

what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2014 are due to compensation and benefits?

Question: what percentage of total other liabilities and accrued expenses in 2014 are due to compensation and benefits?

Answer: 52%

$ in millions the compensation and benefits of as of december 2014 is $ 8368 ; the compensation and benefits of as of december 2013 is $ 7874 ;

$ in millions the total of as of december 2014 is $ 16075 ; the total of as of december 2013 is $ 16044 ;

other liabilities and accrued expenses the table below presents other liabilities and accrued expenses by type. .

$ in millions the accrued expenses and other of as of december 2014 is 4751 ; the accrued expenses and other of as of december 2013 is 5183 ;

Answer: 52%

Answer: 52%

Rejected interval is a real interval from the same grouped question and does not overlap with the chosen interval.

Statement preference uses non-overlapping intervals only.


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 21.3%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate <TIME>?' is 21.3%.

Rejected response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate <TIME>?' is 21.3%.

what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2017?

Question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2017?

Answer: 21.3%

the statutory u.s . rate of 2017 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . rate of 2016 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . rate of 2015 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ;

the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2017 is 0.4 ; the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2016 is 0.9 ; the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2015 is 0.4 ;

the effective income tax rate of 2017 is 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) ; the effective income tax rate of 2016 is 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) ; the effective income tax rate of 2015 is 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) ;

Answer: 21.3%

Answer: 21.3%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development <TIME> compare to <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 33.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development <TIME> compare to <TIME>?' is 33.

Rejected response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development <TIME> compare to <TIME>?' is 33.

CE || what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development <TIME> compare to <TIME>?

what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2015 compare to 2014?

Question: what is the net change in the amount spent for research and development in 2015 compare to 2014?

Answer: 33

research and development expense was $ 78 million , $ 119 million and $ 86 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives .

research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications .

Answer: 33

Answer: 33


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations <TIME>?
Fixed answer: -13636.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations <TIME>?' is -13636.

Rejected response: From 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations <TIME>?' is -13636.

AMT || what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations <TIME>?

what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2006?

Question: what is the net change in the balance of liability related to employee separations during 2006?

Answer: -13636

employee separations the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2005 $ 20963 is liability as of december 31 2005 $ 20963 ; the employee separations of 2006 expense $ 496 is 2006 expense $ 496 ; the employee separations of 2006 cash payments $ -12389 ( 12389 ) is 2006 cash payments $ -12389 ( 12389 ) ; the employee separations of other $ -1743 ( 1743 ) is other $ -1743 ( 1743 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2006 $ 7327 is liability as of december 31 2006 $ 7327 ; the employee separations of 2007 expense $ 633 is 2007 expense $ 633 ; the employee separations of 2007 cash payments $ -6110 ( 6110 ) is 2007 cash payments $ -6110 ( 6110 ) ; the employee separations of other $ -304 ( 304 ) is other $ -304 ( 304 ) ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2007 $ 1546 is liability as of december 31 2007 $ 1546 ; the employee separations of 2008 expense $ 284 is 2008 expense $ 284 ; the employee separations of 2008 cash payments $ -1901 ( 1901 ) is 2008 cash payments $ -1901 ( 1901 ) ; the employee separations of other $ 71 is other $ 71 ; the employee separations of liability as of december 31 2008 2014 is liability as of december 31 2008 2014 ;

in addition , the company also incurred certain merger related costs for additional employee retention and separation costs incurred during the year ended december 31 , 2006 .

these costs were recognized as an assumed liability in the purchase price allocation .

Answer: -13636

Answer: -13636


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses from 2004 to 2005?
Reference time interval: 2004-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -5.1%.

Rejected response: -7.3%.

AMT || what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses from 2004 to 2005?

Answer: -5.1%

as a result , the company recorded impairment charges and net losses of approximately $ 16.8 million , $ 17.7 million and $ 19.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 , respectively .

2022 non-core asset impairment charges 2014during the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 respectively , the company sold a limited number of non-core towers and other non-core assets and recorded impairment charges to write-down these and other non-core assets to net realizable value .

such charges are reflected in impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 .

impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense the significant components reflected in impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations include the following : impairments and net loss on sale of long-lived assets 2014during the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 , the company recorded impairments and net loss on sale of long-lived assets ( primarily related to its rental and management segment ) of $ 19.1 million , $ 22.3 million and $ 28.3 million , respectively .

the total of liability as of january 1 2003 is $ 3632 ; the total of 2003 restructuring expense is $ 2266 ; the total of 2003 cash payments is $ -2209 ( 2209 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2003 is $ 3689 ; the total of 2004 restructuring expense is $ 692 ; the total of 2004 cash payments is $ -3285 ( 3285 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2004 is $ 1096 ; the total of 2005 restructuring expense is $ 96 ; the total of 2005 cash payments is $ -773 ( 773 ) ; the total of liability as of december 31 2005 is $ 419 ;

Answer: -5.1%

Question: what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses from 2003 to 2004?

Answer: -7.3%

during the year ended december 31 , 2003 , the company sold approximately 300 non-core towers and certain other non-core assets and recorded impairment charges to write-down these and other non-core assets to net realizable value .

Answer: -7.3%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in free cash flow from 2001 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2001-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 35%.

Rejected response: 102%.

UNP || what was the percentage change in free cash flow <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in free cash flow from 2001 to 2011?

Answer: 35%

millions the free cash flow of 2011 is $ 1917 ; the free cash flow of 2010 is $ 1415 ; the free cash flow of 2009 is $ 699 ;

f0b7 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled $ 5.9 billion , yielding record free cash flow of $ 1.9 billion in 2011 .

free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .

millions the cash provided by operating activities of 2011 is $ 5873 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2010 is $ 4105 ; the cash provided by operating activities of 2009 is $ 3204 ;

millions the cash used in investing activities of 2011 is -3119 ( 3119 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2010 is -2488 ( 2488 ) ; the cash used in investing activities of 2009 is -2145 ( 2145 ) ;

Answer: 35%

Question: what was the percentage change in free cash flow from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 102%

the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2011 2010 2009 .

Answer: 102%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percent of total route miles are main line <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 53%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total route miles are main line <TIME>?' is 53%.

Rejected response: From 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total route miles are main line <TIME>?' is 53%.

UNP || what percent of total route miles are main line <TIME>?

what percent of total route miles are main line in 2006?

Question: what percent of total route miles are main line in 2006?

Answer: 53%

the main line of 2006 is 27318 ; the main line of 2005 is 27301 ;

the total of 2006 is 51596 ; the total of 2005 is 52667 ;

track 2013 the railroad operates on 32339 main line and branch line route miles in 23 states in the western two-thirds of the united states .

the branch line of 2006 is 5021 ; the branch line of 2005 is 5125 ;

Answer: 53%

Answer: 53%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 6%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers <TIME>?' is 6%.

Rejected response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers <TIME>?' is 6%.

IP || brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers <TIME>?

brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2005?

Question: brazilian paper sales represented what percentage of printing papers in 2005?

Answer: 6%

in millions the sales of 2006 is $ 6930 ; the sales of 2005 is $ 7170 ; the sales of 2004 is $ 7135 ;

brazil ian paper net sales for 2006 of $ 496 mil- lion were higher than the $ 465 million in 2005 and the $ 417 million in 2004 .

printing papers in millions 2006 2005 2004 .

in millions the operating profit of 2006 is $ 677 ; the operating profit of 2005 is $ 473 ; the operating profit of 2004 is $ 508 ;

Answer: 6%

Answer: 6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in millions of average equity from 2010 to 2011?
Reference time interval: 2010-01-01 00:00:00 to 2012-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 889.

Rejected response: 1224.

UNP || what was the change in millions of average equity <TIME>?

Question: what was the change in millions of average equity from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 889

millions except percentages the average equity of 2011 is $ 18171 ; the average equity of 2010 is $ 17282 ; the average equity of 2009 is $ 16058 ;

return on average common shareholders 2019 equity millions , except percentages 2011 2010 2009 .

millions except percentages The return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2011 is 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) ; The return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2010 is 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ; The return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2009 is 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) ;

millions except percentages the return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2011 is 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) ; the return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2010 is 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ; the return on average commonshareholders 2019 equity of 2009 is 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) ;

Answer: 889

Question: what was the change in millions of average equity from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 1224

Answer: 1224


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2008 trading assets , in millions?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 305261.

Rejected response: 257839.

JPM || excluding derivatives , what are net <TIME> trading assets , in millions?

Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2008 trading assets , in millions?

Answer: 305261

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2009 is $ 318063 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2008 is $ 384102 ; the trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments of 2007 is $ 381415 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2009 is $ 60224 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2008 is $ 78841 ; the trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) of 2007 is $ 94737 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) The trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2009 is 110457 ; The trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2008 is 121417 ; The trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2007 is 65439 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2009 is 110457 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2008 is 121417 ; the trading assets 2013 derivative receivables of 2007 is 65439 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2009 is 77901 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2008 is 93200 ; the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables of 2007 is 65198 ;

Answer: 305261

Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2009 trading assets , in millions?

Answer: 257839

Answer: 257839


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 are due in 2005?
Reference time interval: 2001-12-31 00:00:00 to 2002-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 8%.

Rejected response: 12%.

AES || what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt <TIME> are due <TIME>?

Question: what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 are due in 2005?

Answer: 8%

future maturities of debt 2014scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 , are ( in millions ) : .

2002 the thereafter of $ 2672 is 12806 ;

Answer: 8%

Question: what percentage of scheduled maturities of total debt at december 31 , 2001 are due in 2002?

Answer: 12%

as of december 31 , 2001 , $ 496 million was available .

Answer: 12%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net income per common share in 2007?
Reference time interval: 2007-01-01 00:00:00 to 2008-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.56.

Rejected response: .385.

DRE || what is the net income per common share <TIME>?

Question: what is the net income per common share in 2007?

Answer: 1.56

the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2008 is $ 56616 ; the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2007 is $ 217692 ; the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2006 is $ 145095 ;

the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2008 is 146915 ; the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2007 is 139255 ; the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2006 is 134883 ;

unbilled receivables on construction contracts totaled $ 22.7 million and $ 33.1 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

the specific timing of the sale is measured against various criteria in sfas 66 related to the terms of the transactions and any continuing involvement in the form of management or financial assistance from the seller associated with the properties .

the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2008 is $ 59584 ; the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2007 is $ 232091 ; the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2006 is $ 159333 ;

Answer: 1.56

Question: what is the net income per common share in 2008?

Answer: .385

Answer: .385


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2017 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 9.9%.

Rejected response: 5.54%.

Question: in 2017 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

Answer: 9.9%

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2018 is $ 55687 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2017 is $ 51410 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2016 is $ 47292 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2018 is 3087 ; the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2017 is 4630 ; the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2016 is 6334 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2018 is $ 52600 ; the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2017 is $ 46780 ; the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2016 is $ 40958 ;

Answer: 9.9%

Question: in 2018 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

Answer: 5.54%

year ended december 31 , ( in millions , except rates ) 2018 2017 2016 net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) $ 55687 $ 51410 $ 47292 less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) 3087 4630 6334 net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) $ 52600 $ 46780 $ 40958 average interest-earning assets $ 2229188 $ 2180592 $ 2101604 less : average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c ) 609635 540835 520307 average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets $ 1619553 $ 1639757 $ 1581297 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) 2.36% ( 2.36 % ) 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) net interest yield on average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c ) 0.51 0.86 1.22 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) 2.85% ( 2.85 % ) 2.59% ( 2.59 % ) ( a ) interest includes the effect of related hedges .

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) The less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2018 is 3087 ; The less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2017 is 4630 ; The less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2016 is 6334 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) The net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2018 is $ 52600 ; The net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2017 is $ 46780 ; The net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2016 is $ 40958 ;

Answer: 5.54%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies from 2016 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -4.1%.

Rejected response: 42.9%.

FIS || what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -4.1%

during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , we generated approximately $ 1830 million , $ 1909 million and $ 1336 million , respectively , in revenues denominated in currencies other than the u.s .

a 10% ( 10 % ) move in average exchange rates for these currencies ( assuming a simultaneous and immediate 10% ( 10 % ) change in all of such rates for the relevant period ) would have resulted in the following increase or ( decrease ) in our reported revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in millions ) : .

our exposure to foreign currency exchange risks generally arises from our non-u.s .

dollar during these years compared to the preceding year .

Answer: -4.1%

Question: what is the percentage change in revenue generated from non-us currencies from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 42.9%

Answer: 42.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in collateral posted between 2011 and 2012?
Reference time interval: 2011-01-01 00:00:00 to 2013-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: -16%.

Rejected response: -25%.

GS || what was the percentage change in collateral posted <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in collateral posted between 2011 and 2012?

Answer: -16%

in millions the collateral posted of as of december 2012 is 24296 ; the collateral posted of as of december 2011 is 29002 ;

in millions The additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 1534 ; The additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 1303 ;

in millions The additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ; The additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 2183 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 1534 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 1303 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2011 is 2183 ;

Answer: -16%

Question: what was the percentage change in collateral posted from 2012 to 2013?

Answer: -25%

in millions the collateral posted of as of december 2013 is 18178 ; the collateral posted of as of december 2012 is 24296 ;

in millions The additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 911 ; The additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 1534 ;

in millions The additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 2989 ; The additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 911 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 1534 ;

in millions the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2013 is 2989 ; the additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade of as of december 2012 is 2500 ;

Answer: -25%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: <TIME> what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income
Fixed answer: 5.54%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question '<TIME> what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income' is 5.54%.

Rejected response: From 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question '<TIME> what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income' is 5.54%.

JPM || <TIME> what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

in 2018 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

Question: in 2018 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

Answer: 5.54%

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2018 is $ 55687 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2017 is $ 51410 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2016 is $ 47292 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2018 is 3087 ; the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2017 is 4630 ; the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2016 is 6334 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2018 is $ 52600 ; the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2017 is $ 46780 ; the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2016 is $ 40958 ;

Answer: 5.54%

Answer: 5.54%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the net income per common share in 2008?
Reference time interval: 2008-01-01 00:00:00 to 2009-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: .385.

Rejected response: 1.56.

Question: what is the net income per common share in 2008?

Answer: .385

the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2008 is $ 56616 ; the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2007 is $ 217692 ; the basic net income available for common shareholders of 2006 is $ 145095 ;

the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2008 is $ 59584 ; the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2007 is $ 232091 ; the diluted net income available for common shareholders of 2006 is $ 159333 ;

the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2008 is 146915 ; the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2007 is 139255 ; the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 2006 is 134883 ;

Answer: .385

Question: what is the net income per common share in 2007?

Answer: 1.56

Answer: 1.56


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2005 to 2006?
Reference time interval: 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 16.5%.

Rejected response: -21.0%.

ABMD || what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between <TIME> to <TIME>?

Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2005 to 2006?

Answer: 16.5%

the weighted average grant-date fair value for options granted during fiscal years 2005 , 2006 , and 2007 was $ 8.05 , $ 6.91 , and $ 8.75 per share , respectively .

the fair value of options granted during the fiscal years 2005 , 2006 and 2007 were calculated using the following weighted average assumptions: .

the calculation of the fair value of the options is net of estimated forfeitures .

the remaining unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for unvested stock option awards at march 31 , 2007 was approximately $ 9.0 million , net of forfeitures , and the weighted average time over which this cost will be recognized is 1.9 years .

Answer: 16.5%

Question: what is the growth rate in the weighted average fair value for options granted between 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -21.0%

Answer: -21.0%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percent of total route miles are main line <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 52%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total route miles are main line <TIME>?' is 52%.

Rejected response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total route miles are main line <TIME>?' is 52%.

what percent of total route miles are main line in 2005?

Question: what percent of total route miles are main line in 2005?

Answer: 52%

the main line of 2006 is 27318 ; the main line of 2005 is 27301 ;

the branch line of 2006 is 5021 ; the branch line of 2005 is 5125 ;

the total of 2006 is 51596 ; the total of 2005 is 52667 ;

Answer: 52%

Answer: 52%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: <TIME> what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?
Fixed answer: 11%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2006-01-01 00:00:00 to 2007-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question '<TIME> what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?' is 11%.

Rejected response: From 2005-01-01 00:00:00 to 2006-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question '<TIME> what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?' is 11%.

IP || <TIME> what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

in 2006 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

Question: in 2006 what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was due to consumer packaging?

Answer: 11%

in millions the consumer packaging of 2006 is 116 ; the consumer packaging of 2005 is 126 ; the consumer packaging of 2004 is 198 ;

in millions the total from continuing operations of 2006 is $ 1009 ; the total from continuing operations of 2005 is $ 992 ; the total from continuing operations of 2004 is $ 925 ;

the following table presents capital spending from continuing operations by each of our business segments for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .

capital spending from continuing operations was $ 1.0 billion in 2006 , or 87% ( 87 % ) of depreciation and amortization , comparable to $ 992 million , or 78% ( 78 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2005 , and $ 925 mil- lion , or 73% ( 73 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2004 .

Answer: 11%

Answer: 11%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2014?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 33%.

Rejected response: 34%.

CMCSA || what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2014?

Answer: 33%

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the cable distribution system of 2015 is $ 2424 ; the cable distribution system of 2014 is $ 2047 ; the cable distribution system of 2013 is $ 1819 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the other equipment of 2015 is 756 ; the other equipment of 2014 is 613 ; the other equipment of 2013 is 527 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total of 2015 is $ 7034 ; the total of 2014 is $ 6154 ; the total of 2013 is $ 5403 ;

the table below summarizes the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable communications segment in 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .

Answer: 33%

Question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2015?

Answer: 34%

Answer: 34%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percent of total consolidated revenues <TIME> was the gfs segment?
Fixed answer: 36%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total consolidated revenues <TIME> was the gfs segment?' is 36%.

Rejected response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total consolidated revenues <TIME> was the gfs segment?' is 36%.

FIS || what percent of total consolidated revenues <TIME> was the gfs segment?

what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2015 was the gfs segment?

Question: what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2015 was the gfs segment?

Answer: 36%

the gfs of 2016 is 4250 ; the gfs of 2015 is 2360 ; the gfs of 2014 is 2198 ;

the total consolidated revenues of 2016 is $ 9241 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2015 is $ 6596 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2014 is $ 6413 ;

revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : .

Answer: 36%

Answer: 36%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation from 2013 to 2014 in millions?
Reference time interval: 2013-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 1.

Rejected response: -2.

ZBH || what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation <TIME> in millions?

Question: what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation from 2013 to 2014 in millions?

Answer: 1

for the years ended december 31 , the total expense net of tax of 2015 is $ 31.9 ; the total expense net of tax of 2014 is $ 33.9 ; the total expense net of tax of 2013 is $ 32.9 ;

share-based compensation expense was as follows ( in millions ) : .

for the years ended december 31, The total expense pre-tax of 2015 is $ 46.4 ; The total expense pre-tax of 2014 is $ 49.4 ; The total expense pre-tax of 2013 is $ 48.5 ;

for the years ended december 31, the total expense pre-tax of 2015 is $ 46.4 ; the total expense pre-tax of 2014 is $ 49.4 ; the total expense pre-tax of 2013 is $ 48.5 ;

for the years ended december 31, the total expense net of tax of 2015 is $ 31.9 ; the total expense net of tax of 2014 is $ 33.9 ; the total expense net of tax of 2013 is $ 32.9 ;

we have registered 57.9 million shares of common stock under these plans .

Answer: 1

Question: what was the change in total expense net of tax for share based compensation from 2014 to 2015 in millions?

Answer: -2

Answer: -2


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2017?
Reference time interval: 2017-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 21.3%.

Rejected response: 10.6%.

ECL || what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate <TIME>?

Question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2017?

Answer: 21.3%

the statutory u.s . rate of 2017 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . rate of 2016 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ; the statutory u.s . rate of 2015 is 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) ;

the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2017 is 0.4 ; the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2016 is 0.9 ; the state income taxes net of federal benefit of 2015 is 0.4 ;

the effective income tax rate of 2017 is 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) ; the effective income tax rate of 2016 is 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) ; the effective income tax rate of 2015 is 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) ;

Answer: 21.3%

Question: what is the difference between the statutory u.s . rate and the effective income tax rate in 2016?

Answer: 10.6%

Answer: 10.6%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2014 to 2015?
Reference time interval: 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 13%.

Rejected response: 26%.

LKQ || what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases <TIME>?

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: 13%

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 211.5 million , $ 168.4 million and $ 148.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .

commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment .

we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .

the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Answer: 13%

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 26%

had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2016 , our portion of the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 59.0 million .

Answer: 26%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill from 2015 to 2017?
Reference time interval: 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2018-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 10.4%.

Rejected response: 12.3%.

ECL || what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill <TIME>?

Question: what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill from 2015 to 2017?

Answer: 10.4%

( millions ) the december 31 2015 of global industrial is $ 2560.8 ; the december 31 2015 of global institutional is $ 662.7 ; the december 31 2015 of global energy is $ 3151.5 ; the december 31 2015 of other is $ 115.8 ; the december 31 2015 of total is $ 6490.8 ;

( millions ) the december 31 2017 of global industrial is $ 2797.0 ; the december 31 2017 of global institutional is $ 1027.0 ; the december 31 2017 of global energy is $ 3203.7 ; the december 31 2017 of other is $ 139.4 ; the december 31 2017 of total is $ 7167.1 ;

( millions ) The segment change ( a ) of global industrial is 62.7 ; The segment change ( a ) of global institutional is -62.7 ( 62.7 ) ; The segment change ( a ) of global energy is - ; The segment change ( a ) of other is - ; The segment change ( a ) of total is - ;

( millions ) the december 31 2016 of global industrial is $ 2585.0 ; the december 31 2016 of global institutional is $ 590.7 ; the december 31 2016 of global energy is $ 3093.6 ; the december 31 2016 of other is $ 113.7 ; the december 31 2016 of total is $ 6383.0 ;

Answer: 10.4%

Question: what is the percentage change in the total carrying amount of goodwill from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: 12.3%

Answer: 12.3%


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what percent of total consolidated revenues <TIME> was the gfs segment?
Fixed answer: 46%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2016-01-01 00:00:00 to 2017-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total consolidated revenues <TIME> was the gfs segment?' is 46%.

Rejected response: From 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what percent of total consolidated revenues <TIME> was the gfs segment?' is 46%.

what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2016 was the gfs segment?

Question: what percent of total consolidated revenues in 2016 was the gfs segment?

Answer: 46%

revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : .

the gfs of 2016 is 4250 ; the gfs of 2015 is 2360 ; the gfs of 2014 is 2198 ;

the total consolidated revenues of 2016 is $ 9241 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2015 is $ 6596 ; the total consolidated revenues of 2014 is $ 6413 ;

Answer: 46%

Answer: 46%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: in 2018 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 5.54%.

Rejected response: 9.9%.

Question: in 2018 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

Answer: 5.54%

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2018 is $ 55687 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2017 is $ 51410 ; the net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) of 2016 is $ 47292 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2018 is 3087 ; the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2017 is 4630 ; the less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) of 2016 is 6334 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates ) the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2018 is $ 52600 ; the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2017 is $ 46780 ; the net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) of 2016 is $ 40958 ;

Answer: 5.54%

Question: in 2017 what was the percent of the cib markets net interest income as part of the managed interest income

Answer: 9.9%

Answer: 9.9%


Instruction: Answer the question according to the given reference time interval.

Input:
Question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2018?\\n
Reference time interval: 2018-01-01 00:00:00 to 2019-01-01 00:00:00

Chosen response: 117624.84.

Rejected response: 95983.54.

GPN || what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , <TIME>?\\n

Question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2018?\\n

Answer: 117624.84

Explanation: this gives us the potential compensation look for the net granting activity at year end .

the unvested at december 31 2018 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1084 ; the unvested at december 31 2018 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 108.51 ;

The unvested at december 31 2016 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1263 ; The unvested at december 31 2016 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 49.55 ;

The unvested at december 31 2017 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1226 ; The unvested at december 31 2017 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 78.29 ;

the unvested at december 31 2016 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1263 ; the unvested at december 31 2016 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 49.55 ;

the unvested at december 31 2017 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1226 ; the unvested at december 31 2017 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is 78.29 ;

Answer: 117624.84

Question: what was the value in thousands of unvested restricted stock and performance awards at the weighted-averagegrant-datefair value as of december 31 , 2017?\\n

Answer: 95983.54

The unvested at december 31 2018 of shares ( in thousands ) is 1084 ; The unvested at december 31 2018 of weighted-averagegrant-datefair value is $ 108.51 ;

Answer: 95983.54


Instruction: Choose the statement that is temporally correct.

Input:
Base question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures <TIME>?
Fixed answer: 34%.
Question: Which statement is correct?

Chosen response: From 2015-01-01 00:00:00 to 2016-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures <TIME>?' is 34%.

Rejected response: From 2014-01-01 00:00:00 to 2015-01-01 00:00:00, the answer to the question 'what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures <TIME>?' is 34%.

what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2015?

Question: what was the percentage cable distribution systems capital expenditures of the capital expenditures incurred in cable communications segment capital expenditures in 2015?

Answer: 34%

the table below summarizes the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable communications segment in 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the cable distribution system of 2015 is $ 2424 ; the cable distribution system of 2014 is $ 2047 ; the cable distribution system of 2013 is $ 1819 ;

year ended december 31 ( in millions ) the total of 2015 is $ 7034 ; the total of 2014 is $ 6154 ; the total of 2013 is $ 5403 ;

Answer: 34%

Answer: 34%