Add detailed dataset description
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -73,15 +73,69 @@ configs:
|
|
| 73 |
---
|
| 74 |
# Dataset Card for the benchmark Propaganda Dataset
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
## Dataset Details
|
| 80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 81 |
### Dataset Description
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
<!-- Provide a longer summary of what this dataset is. -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
### Dataset Sources
|
| 87 |
|
|
|
|
| 73 |
---
|
| 74 |
# Dataset Card for the benchmark Propaganda Dataset
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
+
Propaganda corpus is a joint work between multiple faculties of Masaryk University
|
| 77 |
+
(Faculty of Social Sciences, Faculty of Informatics, and Faculty of Law)
|
| 78 |
+
under the project Manipulative techniques of propaganda in the
|
| 79 |
+
age of Internet 1. In its current state, the dataset contains 8,646 doc-
|
| 80 |
+
uments that were extracted from four Czech news websites. These
|
| 81 |
+
websites were previously investigated for distributing Russian pro-
|
| 82 |
+
paganda.
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
## Dataset Details
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
Each document is annotated with three types of attributes:
|
| 90 |
+
1. **Manipulative techniques:**
|
| 91 |
+
- relate to specific sections of the document
|
| 92 |
+
| **Attribute** | **Classes** | **Description** |
|
| 93 |
+
| :--------- | :------- | :----------- |
|
| 94 |
+
| **Argumentation** | yes, no | Does the text present facts or arguments (logical, emotional, etc.) to support the main claim? |
|
| 95 |
+
| **Blaming**| yes, no | Does the text accuse someone of something? |
|
| 96 |
+
| **Demonization** | yes, no | Is the “enemy” and/or his/her goals or interests presented in the text as being evil |
|
| 97 |
+
| **Emotions** | grieviance, hatred, compassion, fear, missing | What is the main emotion the text is trying to evoke in the reader? |
|
| 98 |
+
| **Fabulation** | yes, no | Does the text contain unsubstantiated, overstated or otherwise incorrect claims? |
|
| 99 |
+
| **Fear-mongering** | yes, no | Is the text trying to appeal to fear, uncertainty or other threat? |
|
| 100 |
+
| **Labeling** | yes, no | The text uses specific labels – short and impactful phrases or words – to describe a person, group or object. |
|
| 101 |
+
| **Relativization** | yes, no | Are the presented actions of a person, group or party being relativized? |
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
|
| 104 |
+
2. **Global attributes:**
|
| 105 |
+
| **Attribute** | **Classes** | **Description** |
|
| 106 |
+
| :--------- | :------- | :----------- |
|
| 107 |
+
| **Genre** | news, comment, interview | The publication form of the news text. |
|
| 108 |
+
| **Location** | EU, Czech Republic, USA, Russia, NATO, Russia + USA, other locations, other/cannot be determined | What is the main location the text discusses about? |
|
| 109 |
+
| **Overall Sentiment** | positive, negative, neutral | The core sentiment of the newspaper text. |
|
| 110 |
+
| **Topic** | migration crisis, domestic politics, foreign policy / diplomacy, society / social situation, energy, economy / finance, conflict in Ukraine, conflict in Syria, conspiracy, other, culture, social policy, arms policy | various topics |
|
| 111 |
+
| **Scope** | foreign, domestic, both, cannot be determined | Distinguishes domestic and foreign topics |
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
+
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
3. **Other attributes:**
|
| 116 |
+
- do no fit into any other categories (they relate to a specific section of a document but are not manipulative techniques by themselves)
|
| 117 |
+
|
| 118 |
+
| **Attribute** | **Classes** | **Description** |
|
| 119 |
+
| :--------- | :------- | :----------- |
|
| 120 |
+
| **Expert** | yes, no | Is the text or opinion in the text presented as being supported by an expert? |
|
| 121 |
+
| **Opinion** | yes, no | Does the author of the text present his or her personal opinion? |
|
| 122 |
+
| **Russia** | positive example, neutral, victim, negative example, hero, missing | How Russia is depicted in the article? |
|
| 123 |
+
| **Source** | yes, no | Is the text presented as being based on a specific source? |
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
### Dataset Description
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
<!-- Provide a longer summary of what this dataset is. -->
|
| 128 |
+
The benchmark Propaganda dataset contains 8,646 newspaper articles from 2016 (5,500 documents, 2,7 million tokens),
|
| 129 |
+
2017 (1,994 documents, 930 thousand tokens), and 2018 (1,152 documents, 500 thousand tokens). Compared with other resources,
|
| 130 |
+
the Propaganda dataset contains fine-grained annotations of both document-level attributes and specific text devices exemplified
|
| 131 |
+
by marked phrases from the article texts.
|
| 132 |
|
| 133 |
+
The Czech Republic was selected here as a representative of a country within the former Soviet Union influence and, as such,
|
| 134 |
+
with significantly active propaganda sources. The analyzed news texts were downloaded from four newspaper media outlets publishing in the Czech language:
|
| 135 |
+
1. Sputnik News
|
| 136 |
+
2. Parlamentní listy (Parliamentary Letters)
|
| 137 |
+
3. AC24
|
| 138 |
+
4. Svět kolem nás (The World around Us).
|
| 139 |
|
| 140 |
### Dataset Sources
|
| 141 |
|