Upload folder using huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ A heterogeneous knowledge graph extracted from 4,059 court decisions of the **Co
|
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
This is the **graph companion** to the tabular [OHADA-CCJA Court Decisions Corpus](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Maathis-com/ohada-ccja-corpus). The tabular dataset provides the raw text and metadata; this dataset provides the extracted relational structure for graph ML research.
|
| 28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 29 |
### Why a Graph?
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Legal reasoning is inherently relational. Courts cite prior decisions, apply specific legal articles, and resolve disputes between named parties under particular branches of law. These relationships are invisible in a flat tabular format but become first-class features in a graph. This dataset makes them explicit, enabling research at the intersection of legal NLP and graph machine learning — a combination that has received almost no attention for African legal systems.
|
|
|
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
This is the **graph companion** to the tabular [OHADA-CCJA Court Decisions Corpus](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Maathis-com/ohada-ccja-corpus). The tabular dataset provides the raw text and metadata; this dataset provides the extracted relational structure for graph ML research.
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
+

|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
### Why a Graph?
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Legal reasoning is inherently relational. Courts cite prior decisions, apply specific legal articles, and resolve disputes between named parties under particular branches of law. These relationships are invisible in a flat tabular format but become first-class features in a graph. This dataset makes them explicit, enabling research at the intersection of legal NLP and graph machine learning — a combination that has received almost no attention for African legal systems.
|