THE CORFU CHANNEL CASE


THE CORFU CHANNEL CASE

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland


SEPARATE OPINION BY JUDGES BASDEVANT, ALVAREZ, WINIARSKI, ZORIČIĆ, DE VISSCHER, BADAWI PASHA AND KRYLOV.


DISSENTING OPINION BY Dr. IGOR DAXNER.


THE CORFU CHANNEL CASE (MERITS)


INDIVIDUAL OPINION BY JUDGE ALVAREZ.


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE WINIARSKI


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE BADAWI PASHA


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE KRYLOV


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE AZEVEDO


DISSENTING OPINION BY DR. EČER.


THE CORFU CHANNEL CASE (ASSESSMENT OF THE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION DUE FROM THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA)


DISSENTING OPINION BY Dr. EČER, JUDGE "AD HOC"


REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION ON THE CONDITIONS OF ADMISSION OF A STATE TO MEMBERSHIP IN THE UNITED NATIONS (ARTICLE 4 OF THE CHARTER)


CONDITIONS OF ADMISSION OF A STATE TO MEMBERSHIP IN THE UNITED NATIONS (ARTICLE 4 OF THE CHARTER)


INDIVIDUAL OPINION BY M. ALVAREZ.


INDIVIDUAL OPINION BY M. AZEVEDO.


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES BASDEVANT, WINIARSKI, SIR ARNOLD McNAIR AND READ.


DISSENTING OPINION BY M. ZORIČIĆ


DISSENTING OPINION BY M. KRYLOV.


REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION ON REPARATION FOR INJURIES SUFFERED IN THE SERVICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS.


REPARATION FOR INJURIES SUFFERED IN THE SERVICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS


INDIVIDUAL OPINION BY JUDGE ALVAREZ


INDIVIDUAL OPINION BY JUDGE AZEVEDO.


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE HACKWORTH


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE KRYLOV.


ORDER OF NOVEMBER 9th, 1949


AFFAIRE ANGLO-NORVÉGIENNE DES PÊCHERIES


ANGLO-NORWEGIAN FISHERIES CASE


AFFAIRE DES PÊCHERIES (ROYAUME-UNI c. NORVÈGE)


INDIVIDUAL OPINION OF JUDGE ALVAREZ


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE HSU MO


DISSENTING OPINION OF SIR ARNOLD MCNAIR


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE J. E. READ


CASE CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF FRENCH NATIONALS AND PROTECTED PERSONS IN EGYPT (DISCONTINUANCE)


ORDER OF OCTOBER 20th, 1949


COLOMBIAN-PERUVIAN ASYLUM CASE


ORDER OF MAY 9th, 1950


JUDGMENT OF NOVEMBER 20th, 1950


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE ALVAREZ


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE READ


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE AZEVEDO


DISSENTING OPINION BY M. CAICEDO CASTILLA


CERTAIN PROCEDURAL QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE INTERPRETATION OF PEACE TREATIES WITH BULGARIA, HUNGARY AND ROMANIA


INTERPRETATION OF PEACE TREATIES WITH BULGARIA, HUNGARY AND ROMANIA


SEPARATE OPINION BY JUDGE AZEVEDO


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WINIARSKI


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE ZORIČIĆ


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE KRYLOV


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE READ


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AZEVEDO


COMPETENCE OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FOR THE ADMISSION OF NEW MEMBERS TO THE UNITED NATIONS


COMPETENCE OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FOR THE ADMISSION OF A STATE TO THE UNITED NATIONS


DISSENTING OPINION BY M. ALVAREZ


DISSENTING OPINION OF M. AZEVEDO


INTERNATIONAL STATUS OF SOUTH-WEST AFRICA


SEPARATE OPINION BY SIR ARNOLD McNAIR


SEPARATE OPINION BY JUDGE READ


DISSENTING OPINION OF Mr. ALVAREZ


DISSENTING OPINION OF Mr. DE VISSCHER


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KRYLOV


CASE CONCERNING RIGHTS OF NATIONALS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN MOROCCO (FRANCE / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


CASE CONCERNING RIGHTS OF NATIONALS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN MOROCCO


CASE CONCERNING RIGHTS OF NATIONALS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN MOROCCO (FRANCE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES HACKWORTH, BADAWI, LEVI CARNEIRO AND SIR BENEGAL RAU


RESERVATIONS TO THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)


RESERVATIONS TO THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES GUERRERO, SIR ARNOLD MCNAIR, READ, HSU MO


DISSENTING OPINION OF M. ALVAREZ


REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION OF THE JUDGMENT OF NOVEMBER 20th, 1950, IN THE ASYLUM CASE (COLOMBIA/PERU)


HAYA DE LA TORRE CASE (COLOMBIA / PERU)


AFFAIRE HAYA DE LA TORRE (COLOMBIE/PÉROU)


AFFAIRE AMBATIELOS (GRÈCE / ROYAUME-UNI)


AFFAIRE AMBATIELOS (GRÈCE c. ROYAUME-UNI)


AMBATIELOS CASE (GREECE v. UNITED KINGDOM)


INDIVIDUAL OPINION OF JUDGE LEVI CARNEIRO


INDIVIDUAL OPINION OF M. SPIROPOULOS


DISSENTING OPINION OF PRESIDENT McNAIR


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BASDEVANT


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ZORIČIĆ


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KLAESTAD


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE HSU MO


MERITS: OBLIGATION TO ARBITRATE


DISSENTING OPINION BY SIR ARNOLD MCNAIR, PRESIDENT, AND JUDGES BASDEVANT, KLAESTAD AND READ


ANGLO-IRANIAN OIL Co. CASE


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES WINIARSKI AND BADAWI PASHA


ORDER OF DECEMBER 20th, 1951


AFFAIRE DE L’ANGLO-IRANIAN OIL Co. (ROYAUME-UNI c. IRAN)


INDIVIDUAL OPINION OF PRESIDENT MCNAIR


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ALVAREZ


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE HACKWORTH


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE READ


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LEVI CARNEIRO


THE MINQUIERS AND ECREHOS CASE (UNITED KINGDOM / FRANCE)


THE MINQUIERS AND ECREHOS CASE


THE MINQUIERS AND ECREHOS CASE (FRANCE/UNITED KINGDOM)


INDIVIDUAL OPINION OF JUDGE BASDEVANT


NOTTEBOHM CASE


ORDER OF MARCH 7th, 1952


NOTTEBOHM CASE (LIECHTENSTEIN v. GUATEMALA)


JUDGMENT OF NOVEMBER 18th, 1953


ORDER OF JANUARY 15th, 1954


AFFAIRE NOTTEBOHM (LIECHTENSTEIN c. GUATEMALA)


JUDGMENT OF APRIL 6th, 1955


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KLAESTAD


DISSENTING OPINION OF M. GUGGENHEIM, JUDGE "AD HOC"


CASE OF THE MONETARY GOLD REMOVED FROM ROME IN 1943 (ITALY v. FRANCE, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


CASE OF THE MONETARY GOLD REMOVED FROM ROME IN 1943


FRANCE, ROYAUME-UNI DE GRANDE-BRETAGNE ET D'IRLANDE DU NORD ET ÉTATS-UNIS D'AMÉRIQUE

CASE OF THE MONETARY GOLD REMOVED FROM ROME IN 1943 (PRELIMINARY QUESTION)


MONETARY GOLD CASE


INDIVIDUAL OPINION BY JUDGE READ


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE LEVI CARNEIRO


"ÉLECTRICITÉ DE BEYROUTH" COMPANY CASE


ORDER OF APRIL 8th, 1954


"ÉLECTRICITÉ DE BEYROUTH" COMPANY CASE (FRANCE v. LEBANON)


EFFECT OF AWARDS OF COMPENSATION MADE BY THE UNITED NATIONS ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)


EFFECT OF AWARDS OF COMPENSATION MADE BY THE UNITED NATIONS ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


INDIVIDUAL OPINION BY JUDGE B. WINIARSKI


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE ALVAREZ


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE HACKWORTH


TREATMENT IN HUNGARY OF AIRCRAFT AND CREW OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUNGARIAN PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC)


TREATMENT IN HUNGARY OF AIRCRAFT AND CREW OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS)


VOTING PROCEDURE ON QUESTIONS RELATING TO REPORTS AND PETITIONS CONCERNING THE TERRITORY OF SOUTH-WEST AFRICA (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)


VOTING PROCEDURE ON QUESTIONS RELATING TO REPORTS AND PETITIONS CONCERNING THE TERRITORY OF SOUTH-WEST AFRICA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BASDEVANT


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KLAESTAD


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE LAUTERPACHT


AERIAL INCIDENT OF MARCH 10th, 1953 (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CZECHOSLOVAKIA)


ANTARCTICA CASE


ANTARCTICA CASE (UNITED KINGDOM v. CHILE)


AERIAL INCIDENT OF OCTOBER 7th, 1952 (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS)


CASE OF CERTAIN NORWEGIAN LOANS (FRANCE v. NORWAY)


CASE OF CERTAIN NORWEGIAN LOANS


NORWEGIAN LOANS (JUDGMENT OF JULY 6th, 1957)


OF M. BADAWI, VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE COURT


OF JUDGE SIR HERSCH LAUTERPACHT


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GUERRERO


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BASDEVANT


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE READ


JUDGMENTS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANISATION UPON COMPLAINTS MADE AGAINST THE UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)


JUDGMENTS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANISATION UPON COMPLAINTS MADE AGAINST THE UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization


SEPARATE OPINION BY JUDGE WINIARSKI


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KLAESTAD


SEPARATE OPINION OF SIR MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLA KHAN


DISSENTING OPINION OF PRESIDENT HACKWORTH


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT BADAWI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CÓRDOVA


ADMISSIBILITY OF HEARINGS BY THE COMMITTEE ON SOUTH WEST AFRICA (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)


ADMISSIBILITY OF HEARINGS OF PETITIONERS BY THE COMMITTEE ON SOUTH WEST AFRICA


SEPARATE OPINION OF SIR HERSCH LAUTERPACHT


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT BADAWI AND JUDGES BASDEVANT, HSU MO, ARMAND-UGON AND MORENO QUINTANA


RIGHT OF PASSAGE OVER INDIAN TERRITORY (PORTUGAL v. INDIA)


RIGHT OF PASSAGE OVER INDIAN TERRITORY


CASE CONCERNING RIGHT OF PASSAGE OVER INDIAN TERRITORY (PORTUGAL v. INDIA)


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KLAESTAD


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CHAGLA


DECLARATION BY PRESIDENT KLAESTAD


DECLARATION BY JUDGE BASDEVANT


DECLARATION BY JUDGE BADAWI


DECLARATION BY JUDGE KOJEVNIKOV


DECLARATION BY JUDGE SPIROPOULOS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE V. K. WELLINGTON KOO


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES WINIARSKI AND BADAWI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ARMAND-UGON


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORENO QUINTANA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SIR PERCY SPENDER


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FERNANDES


CASE CONCERNING THE GUARDIANSHIP OF AN INFANT (NETHERLANDS v. SWEDEN)


CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION OF 1902 GOVERNING THE GUARDIANSHIP OF INFANTS (NETHERLANDS v. SWEDEN)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BADAWI


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SIR HERSCH LAUTERPACHT


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MORENO QUINTANA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE WELLINGTON KOO


SEPARATE OPINION OF SIR PERCY SPENDER


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WINIARSKI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CÓRDOVA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE "AD HOC" OFFERHAUS


INTERHANDEL CASE (SWITZERLAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KLAESTAD


(SWITZERLAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


INTERHANDEL CASE (SWITZERLAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) (PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE HACKWORTH


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE CÓRDOVA


DISSENTING OPINION OF PRESIDENT KLAESTAD


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ARMAND-UGON


DISSENTING OPINION OF SIR HERSCH LAUTERPACHT


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SPIROPOULOS


CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF JULY 27th, 1955 (ISRAEL v. BULGARIA)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BADAWI


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ARMAND-UGON


JOINT DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGES SIR HERSCH LAUTERPACHT, WELLINGTON KOO AND SIR PERCY SPENDER


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GOITEIN


CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF JULY 27th, 1955 (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BULGARIA)


CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF 27 JULY 1955 (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BULGARIA)


CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF JULY 27th, 1955 (UNITED KINGDOM v. BULGARIA)


CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF 27 JULY 1955 (UNITED KINGDOM v. BULGARIA)


AFFAIRE RELATIVE A LA SOUVERAINETÉ SUR CERTAINES PARCELLES FRONTALIÈRES (BELGIQUE/PAYS-BAS)


ORDER OF MAY 27th, 1958


CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER CERTAIN FRONTIER LAND (BELGIUM/NETHERLANDS)


SOVEREIGNTY OVER FRONTIER LAND


untitled


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ARMAND-UGON


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORENO QUINTANA


CASE CONCERNING THE ARBITRAL AWARD MADE BY THE KING OF SPAIN ON DECEMBER 23rd, 1906 (HONDURAS v. NICARAGUA)


CASE CONCERNING THE ARBITRAL AWARD MADE BY THE KING OF SPAIN ON 23 DECEMBER 1906 (HONDURAS v. NICARAGUA)


ARBITRAL AWARD OF 23 XII 1906 (JUDGM. 18 XI 60)


SEPARATE OPINION OF SIR PERCY SPENDER


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE URRUTIA HOLGUÍN


CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF SEPTEMBER 4th, 1954 (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS)


CASE CONCERNING THE BARCELONA TRACTION, LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY, LIMITED (BELGIUM v. SPAIN)


CASE CONCERNING THE "COMPAGNIE DU PORT, DES QUAIS ET DES ENTREPÔTS DE BEYROUTH" AND THE "SOCIÉTÉ RADIO-ORIENT" (FRANCE v. LEBANON)


CASE CONCERNING THE COMPAGNIE DU PORT, DES QUAIS ET DES ENTREPÔTS DE BEYROUTH AND THE SOCIÉTÉ RADIO-ORIENT (FRANCE v. LEBANON)


CONSTITUTION OF THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE


CONSTITUTION OF THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE OF THE INTER-GOVERNMENTAL MARITIME CONSULTATIVE ORGANIZATION


DISSENTING OPINION OF PRESIDENT KLAESTAD


CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF 7 NOVEMBER 1954 (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS)


CASE CONCERNING THE TEMPLE OF PREAH VIHEAR


CASE CONCERNING THE TEMPLE OF PREAH VIHEAR (CAMBODIA v. THAILAND)


TEMPLE OF PREAH VIHEAR


untitled


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MORELLI


ORDER OF 26 MAY 1961


CASE CONCERNING THE TEMPLE OF PREAH VIHEAR (CAMBODIA v. THAILAND) MERITS


TEMPLE OF PREAH VIHEAR (MERITS)


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT ALFARO


SEPARATE OPINION OF SIR GERALD FITZMAURICE


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORENO QUINTANA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WELLINGTON KOO


DISSENTING OPINION OF SIR PERCY SPENDER


(ETHIOPIA v. UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA)


SOUTH WEST AFRICA CASES


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BUSTAMANTE


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE JESSUP


SEPARATE OPINION OF SIR LOUIS MBANEFO


DISSENTING OPINION OF PRESIDENT WINIARSKI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BASDEVANT


JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF SIR PERCY SPENDER AND SIR GERALD FITZMAURICE


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORELLI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VAN WYK


ORDER OF 18 MARCH 1965


ORDER OF 29 NOVEMBER 1965


SOUTH WEST AFRICA CASES (ETHIOPIA v. SOUTH AFRICA; LIBERIA v. SOUTH AFRICA)


SOUTH WEST AFRICA (JUDGMENT)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MORELLI


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE VAN WYK


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT WELLINGTON KOO


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KORETSKY


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TANAKA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE JESSUP


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PADILLA NERVO


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FORSTER


DISSENTING OPINION OF SIR LOUIS MBANEFO


SOUTH WEST AFRICA CASE (LIBERIA v. UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA)


SOUTH WEST AFRICA CASES


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BUSTAMANTE


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE JESSUP


SEPARATE OPINION OF SIR LOUIS MBANEFO


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BASDEVANT


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORELLI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VAN WYK


ORDER OF 18 MARCH 1965


ORDER OF 29 NOVEMBER 1965


SOUTH WEST AFRICA (JUDGMENT)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MORELLI


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE VAN WYK


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KORETSKY


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TANAKA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE JESSUP


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FORSTER


DISSENTING OPINION OF SIR LOUIS MBANEFO


CASE CONCERNING THE NORTHERN CAMEROONS (CAMEROUN v. UNITED KINGDOM)


CASE CONCERNING THE NORTHERN CAMEROONS (CAMEROON v. UNITED KINGDOM)


NORTHERN CAMEROONS (JUDGMENT OF 2 XII 63)


untitled


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE WELLINGTON KOO


SEPARATE OPINION OF


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BADAWI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BUSTAMANTE


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BEB A DON


FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS OF MEMBERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS


CERTAIN EXPENSES OF THE UNITED NATIONS


CERTAIN EXPENSES OF U.N. (OPINION OF 20 VII 62)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SIR PERCY SPENDER


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MORELLI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BASDEVANT


DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE KORETSKY


CASE CONCERNING THE BARCELONA TRACTION, LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY, LIMITED (NEW APPLICATION: 1962) (BELGIUM v. SPAIN)


CASE CONCERNING THE BARCELONA TRACTION, LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY, LIMITED (NEW APPLICATION: 1962) (BELGIUM v. SPAIN) PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS


BARCELONA TRACTION


BARCELONA TRACTION (JUDGMENT)


untitled


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT WELLINGTON KOO


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE TANAKA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BUSTAMANTE


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORELLI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ARMAND-UGON


CASE CONCERNING THE BARCELONA TRACTION, LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY, LIMITED


BARCELONA TRACTION (DECL. PETRÉN AND ONYEAMA)


OF PRESIDENT BUSTAMANTE Y RIVERO


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SIR GERALD FITZMAURICE


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE JESSUP


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MORELLI


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PADILLA NERVO


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE GROS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AMMOUN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RIPHAGEN


(DENMARK/FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY)


(DENMARK/FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY;


(FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY/DENMARK;


untitled


SEPARATE OPINION OF PRESIDENT J. L. BUSTAMANTE Y RIVERO


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE FOUAD AMMOUN


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT KORETSKY


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TANAKA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORELLI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LACHS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SØRENSEN


(FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY/NETHERLANDS)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE JESSUP


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PADILLA NERVO


LEGAL CONSEQUENCES FOR STATES OF THE CONTINUED PRESENCE OF SOUTH AFRICA IN NAMIBIA (SOUTH WEST AFRICA) NOTWITHSTANDING SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 276 (1970)


NAMIBIA (S.W. AFRICA) (DECL. ZAFRULLA KHAN)


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT AMMOUN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PETRÉN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ONYEAMA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DILLARD


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DE CASTRO


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SIR GERALD FITZMAURICE


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GROS


APPEAL RELATING TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE ICAO COUNCIL (INDIA v. PAKISTAN)


ICAO COUNCIL (DECL. ZAFRULLA KHAN)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE LACHS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DILLARD¹


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DE CASTRO¹


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE JIMÉNEZ DE ARÉCHAGA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MOROZOV


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE NAGENDRA SINGH


(UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND v. ICELAND)


untitled


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PADILLA NERVO


JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES BENGZON AND JIMÉNEZ DE ARÉCHAGA


FISHERIES JURISDICTION CASE


FISHERIES JURISDICTION CASE (UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND v. ICELAND)


FISHERIES JURISDICTION


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PETRÉN


FISHERIES JURISDICTION (DECLARATION OF JUDGE IGNACIO-PINTO)


FISHERIES JURISDICTION (DECL. NAGENDRA SINGH)


JOINT SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES FORSTER, BENGZON, JIMÉNEZ DE ARÉCHAGA, NAGENDRA SINGH AND RUDA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DILLARD


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DE CASTRO


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SIR HUMPHREY WALDOCK


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GROS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ONYEAMA


FISHERIES JURISDICTION CASE (FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY v. ICELAND)


(FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY v. ICELAND)


FISHERIES JURISDICTION (DECL. ZAFRULLA KHAN)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SIR GERALD FITZMAURICE


untitled


FISHERIES JURISDICTION (DECL. DILLARD)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE IGNACIO-PINTO


DECLARATION OF JUDGE NAGENDRA SINGH


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE WALDOCK


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PETRÉN


APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF JUDGEMENT No. 158 OF THE UNITED NATIONS ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)


APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF JUDGEMENT No. 158 OF THE UNITED NATIONS ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


APPLICATION FOR REVIEW (DECL. LACHS)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ONYEAMA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DILLARD


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT AMMOUN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GROS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DE CASTRO


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MOROZOV


REQUEST FOR THE INDICATION OF INTERIM MEASURES OF PROTECTION


NUCLEAR TESTS (ORDER 22 VI 73)


untitled


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FORSTER


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE IGNACIO-PINTO


APPLICATION BY FIJI FOR PERMISSION TO INTERVENE


NUCLEAR TESTS


NUCLEAR TESTS CASE (AUSTRALIA v. FRANCE)


NUCLEAR TESTS CASE


NUCLEAR TESTS (JUDGMENT)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE FORSTER


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE GROS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PETRÉN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE IGNACIO-PINTO


JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES ONYEAMA, DILLARD, JIMÉNEZ DE ARÉCHAGA AND SIR HUMPHREY WALDOCK


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DE CASTRO


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SIR GARFIELD BARWICK


NUCLEAR TESTS (ORDER 20 XII 74)


NUCLEAR TESTS (DECL. JIMÉNEZ DE ARÉCHAGA)


untitled


NUCLEAR TESTS (DECL. NAGENDRA SINGH)


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FORSTER


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GROS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PETRÉN


NUCLEAR TESTS (ORDER 12 VII 73)


NUCLEAR TESTS


NUCLEAR TESTS CASE


NUCLEAR TESTS CASE (NEW ZEALAND v. FRANCE)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE FORSTER


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE GROS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PETRÉN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE IGNACIO-PINTO


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DE CASTRO


CASE CONCERNING TRIAL OF PAKISTANI PRISONERS OF WAR (PAKISTAN v. INDIA)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE NAGENDRA SINGH


(REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)


SAHARA OCCIDENTAL


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MOROZOV


WESTERN SAHARA


WESTERN SAHARA (DECL. GROS)


WESTERN SAHARA (DECL. IGNACIO-PINTO)


SAHARA OCCIDENTAL (DÉCL. IGNACIO-PINTO)


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT AMMOUN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DILLARD


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DE CASTRO


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BONI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RUDA


SEPARATE OPINION OF PRESIDENT JIMÉNEZ DE ARÉCHAGA


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT NAGENDRA SINGH


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE LACHS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MOROZOV


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE RUDA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MOSLER


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ELIAS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE TARAZI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE STASSINOPOULOS


AEGEAN SEA CONTINENTAL SHELF CASE (GREECE v. TURKEY)


JURISDICTION OF THE COURT


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT


DECLARATION BY JUDGE GROS


DECLARATION BY JUDGE MOROZOV


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DE CASTRO


CASE CONCERNING THE CONTINENTAL SHELF (TUNISIA/LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AGO


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE JIMÉNEZ DE ARÉCHAGA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GROS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EVENSEN


CASE CONCERNING UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR STAFF IN TEHRAN


CASE CONCERNING UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR STAFF IN TEHRAN (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IRAN)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE LACHS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MOROZOV


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TARAZI


INTERPRETATION OF THE AGREEMENT OF 25 MARCH 1951 BETWEEN THE WHO AND EGYPT


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE GROS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE RUDA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MOSLER


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE EL-ERIAN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SETTE-CAMARA


APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF JUDGEMENT No. 273 OF THE UNITED NATIONS ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LACHS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EL-KHANI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL


CASE CONCERNING DELIMITATION OF THE MARITIME BOUNDARY IN THE GULF OF MAINE AREA (CANADA/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GROS


CASE CONCERNING THE CONTINENTAL SHELF


CASE CONCERNING THE CONTINENTAL SHELF (LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA/MALTA)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MOROZOV


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MBAYE


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT SETTE-CAMARA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AGO


DISSENTING OPINION OF SIR ROBERT JENNINGS


DECLARATION OF JUDGE EL-KHANI


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT SETTE-CAMARA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES RUDA, BEDJAOUI AND JIMÉNEZ DE ARÉCHAGA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE VALTICOS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MOSLER


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL


CASE CONCERNING THE FRONTIER DISPUTE (BURKINA FASO/MALI)


REQUESTS FOR THE INDICATION OF PROVISIONAL


CASE CONCERNING THE FRONTIER DISPUTE (BURKINA FASO/REPUBLIC OF MALI)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE LUCHAIRE


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ABI-SAAB


CASE CONCERNING MILITARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA (NICARAGUA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES MOSLER AND JENNINGS


CASE CONCERNING MILITARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE NAGENDRA SINGH


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES RUDA, MOSLER, AGO,


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BEDJAOUI


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE RUDA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MOSLER


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AGO


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SIR ROBERT JENNINGS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL


SEPARATE OPINION OF PRESIDENT NAGENDRA SINGH


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE LACHS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ELIAS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SETTE-CAMARA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE NI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SIR ROBERT JENNINGS


APPLICATION FOR REVISION AND INTERPRETATION OF THE JUDGMENT OF 24 FEBRUARY 1982 IN THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONTINENTAL SHELF (TUNISIA/LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BASTID


APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF JUDGEMENT No. 333 OF THE UNITED NATIONS ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF JUDGEMENT No. 333 OF THE UNITED NATIONS ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE LACHS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AGO


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EVENSEN


BORDER AND TRANSBORDER ARMED ACTIONS (NICARAGUA v. COSTA RICA)


CASE CONCERNING BORDER AND TRANSBORDER ARMED ACTIONS (NICARAGUA v. COSTA RICA)


BORDER AND TRANSBORDER ARMED ACTIONS (NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS)


CASE CONCERNING BORDER AND TRANSBORDER ARMED ACTIONS (NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS)


DECLARATION BY JUDGE LACHS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN


CASE CONCERNING BORDER AND TRANSBORDER ARMED ACTIONS


CASE CONCERNING THE LAND, ISLAND AND MARITIME FRONTIER DISPUTE


CASE CONCERNING THE LAND, ISLAND AND MARITIME FRONTIER DISPUTE (EL SALVADOR/HONDURAS)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE ODA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ELIAS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TARASSOV


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN


LAND, ISLAND AND MARITIME FRONTIER DISPUTE


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE VALTICOS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE TORRES BERNÁRDEZ


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


(UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ITALY)


CASE CONCERNING ELETTRONICA SICULA S.p.A. (ELSI)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL


APPLICABILITY OF THE OBLIGATION TO ARBITRATE UNDER SECTION 21 OF THE UNITED NATIONS HEADQUARTERS AGREEMENT OF 26 JUNE 1947


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN


CASE CONCERNING MARITIME DELIMITATION IN THE AREA BETWEEN GREENLAND AND JAN MAYEN (DENMARK v. NORWAY)


DECLARATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT ODA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE EVENSEN


DECLARATION OF JUDGE AGUILAR MAWDSLEY


DECLARATION OF JUDGE RANJEVA


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE WEERAMANTRY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AJIBOLA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FISCHER


CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF 3 JULY 1988 (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE ODA


CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF 3 JULY 1988


CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN PHOSPHATE LANDS IN NAURU (NAURU v. AUSTRALIA)


DISSENTING OPINION OF PRESIDENT SIR ROBERT JENNINGS


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT ODA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AGO


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL


APPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE VI, SECTION 22, OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE UNITED NATIONS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE EVENSEN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN


CASE CONCERNING THE ARBITRAL AWARD OF 31 JULY 1989


CASE CONCERNING THE ARBITRAL AWARD OF 31 JULY 1989 (GUINEA-BISSAU v. SENEGAL)


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE THIERRY


DECLARATION OF JUDGE TARASSOV


DECLARATION OF JUDGE MBAYE


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE LACHS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE NI


OF JUDGES AGUILAR MAWDSLEY AND RANJEVA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WEERAMANTRY


CASE CONCERNING THE TERRITORIAL DISPUTE (LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA/CHAD)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE AGO


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AJIBOLA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SETTE-CAMARA


EAST TIMOR (PORTUGAL v. AUSTRALIA)


CASE CONCERNING EAST TIMOR


CASE CONCERNING EAST TIMOR (PORTUGAL v. AUSTRALIA)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE RANJEVA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE VERESHCHETIN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SKUBISZEWSKI


CASE CONCERNING MARITIME DELIMITATION BETWEEN GUINEA-BISSAU AND SENEGAL


PASSAGE THROUGH THE GREAT BELT (FINLAND v. DENMARK)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE TARASSOV


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BROMS


CASE CONCERNING PASSAGE THROUGH THE GREAT BELT


MARITIME DELIMITATION AND TERRITORIAL QUESTIONS BETWEEN QATAR AND BAHRAIN (QATAR v. BAHRAIN)


APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (UKRAINE v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT SCHWEBEL


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE VALTICOS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT SCHWEBEL


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KOROMA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VALTICOS


CASE CONCERNING MARITIME DELIMITATION AND TERRITORIAL QUESTIONS BETWEEN QATAR AND BAHRAIN (QATAR v. BAHRAIN)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES BEDJAOUI, RANJEVA AND KOROMA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE HERCZEGH


DECLARATION OF JUDGE VERESHCHETIN


DECLARATION OF JUDGE HIGGINS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PARRA-ARANGUREN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AL-KHASAWNEH


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TORRES BERNÁRDEZ


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE FORTIER


DECLARATION OF ACTING PRESIDENT ODA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE NI


JOINT DECLARATION OF JUDGES EVENSEN, TARASSOV, GUILLAUME AND AGUILAR MAWDSLEY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE LACHS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BEDJAOUI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WEERAMANTRY


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RANJEVA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AJIBOLA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EL-KOSHERI


JOINT DECLARATION OF JUDGES BEDJAOUI, GUILLAUME AND RANJEVA


JOINT DECLARATION OF JUDGES BEDJAOUI, RANJEVA AND KOROMA


JOINT DECLARATION OF JUDGES GUILLAUME AND FLEISCHHAUER


DECLARATION OF JUDGE HERCZEGH


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE REZEK


DISSENTING OPINION OF PRESIDENT SCHWEBEL


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SIR ROBERT JENNINGS


QUESTIONS OF INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE 1971 MONTREAL CONVENTION ARISING FROM THE AERIAL INCIDENT AT LOCKERBIE (LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA v. UNITED KINGDOM)


CASE CONCERNING QUESTIONS OF INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE 1971 MONTREAL CONVENTION ARISING FROM THE AERIAL INCIDENT AT LOCKERBIE (LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA v. UNITED KINGDOM)


DECLARATION OF ACTING PRESIDENT ODA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE NI


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE LACHS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BEDJAOUI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WEERAMANTRY


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RANJEVA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AJIBOLA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EL-KOSHERI


DECLARATION OF JUDGE HERCZEGH


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE REZEK


CASE CONCERNING QUESTIONS OF INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE 1971 MONTREAL CONVENTION ARISING FROM THE AERIAL INCIDENT AT LOCKERBIE (LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


QUESTIONS OF INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE 1971 MONTREAL CONVENTION ARISING FROM THE AERIAL INCIDENT AT LOCKERBIE (LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


CASE CONCERNING OIL PLATFORMS


APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (UKRAINE v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE RANJEVA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE HIGGINS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE RIGAUX


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT SCHWEBEL


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RIGAUX


CASE CONCERNING OIL PLATFORMS (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


OIL PLATFORMS (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


DECLARATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT RANJEVA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE KOROMA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AL-KHASAWNEH


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BUERGENTHAL


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ELARABY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE OWADA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SIMMA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE TARASSOV


DECLARATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE WEERAMANTRY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AJIBOLA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE LAUTERPACHT


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TARASSOV


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KREĆA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE ODA


OF JUDGES SHI AND VERESHCHETIN


DECLARATION OF JUDGE LAUTERPACHT


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PARRA-ARANGUREN


APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA v. YUGOSLAVIA) COUNTER-CLAIMS


DECLARATION OF JUDGE KREĆA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOROMA


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT WEERAMANTRY


CASE CONCERNING APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA v. YUGOSLAVIA)


Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)


CASE CONCERNING THE GABČÍKOVO-NAGYMAROS PROJECT (HUNGARY/SLOVAKIA)


CASE CONCERNING THE GABČÍKOVO-NAGYMAROS PROJECT


DECLARATION OF PRESIDENT SCHWEBEL


DECLARATION OF JUDGE REZEK


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT WEERAMANTRY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BEDJAOUI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RANJEVA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE HERCZEGH


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FLEISCHHAUER


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VERESHCHETIN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PARRA-ARANGUREN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SKUBISZEWSKI


APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (UKRAINE v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)


LEGALITY OF THE USE BY A STATE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN ARMED CONFLICT (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE RANJEVA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE FERRARI BRAVO


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WEERAMANTRY


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KOROMA


CASE CONCERNING THE LAND AND MARITIME BOUNDARY BETWEEN CAMEROON AND NIGERIA (CAMEROON v. NIGERIA)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE ODA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN


DECLARATION OF JUDGE KOROMA


JOINT DECLARATION OF JUDGES WEERAMANTRY, SHI AND VERESHCHETIN


DECLARATION OF JUDGE MBAYE


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AJIBOLA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE VERESHCHETIN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE HIGGINS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PARRA-ARANGUREN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AJIBOLA


LAND AND MARITIME BOUNDARY BETWEEN CAMEROON AND NIGERIA (CAMEROON v. NIGERIA)


LAND AND MARITIME BOUNDARY BETWEEN CAMEROON AND NIGERIA (CAMEROON v. NIGERIA: EQUATORIAL GUINEA intervening)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE RANJEVA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE HERCZEGH


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KOROMA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE REZEK


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AL-KHASAWNEH


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MBAYE


DECLARATION OF PRESIDENT BEDJAOUI


DECLARATION OF JUDGE SHI


DECLARATION OF JUDGE VERESHCHETIN


DECLARATION OF JUDGE FERRARI BRAVO


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE GUILLAUME


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE FLEISCHHAUER


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT SCHWEBEL


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WEERAMANTRY


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE HIGGINS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TORRES BERNÁRDEZ


SEPARATE OPINION OF PRESIDENT SCHWEBEL


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOROMA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT WEERAMANTRY


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BEDJAOUI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RANJEVA


DECLARATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT SCHWEBEL


DECLARATION OF JUDGE ODA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE RANJEVA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KOROMA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SIR GEOFFREY PALMER


KASIKILI/SEDUDU ISLAND (BOTSWANA/NAMIBIA)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE KOROMA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE HIGGINS


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FLEISCHHAUER


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE REZEK


DECLARATION OF PRESIDENT SCHWEBEL


DIFFERENCE RELATING TO IMMUNITY FROM LEGAL PROCESS OF A SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR OF THE COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT WEERAMANTRY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE REZEK


REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION OF THE JUDGMENT OF 11 JUNE 1998 IN THE CASE CONCERNING THE LAND AND MARITIME BOUNDARY BETWEEN CAMEROON AND NIGERIA (CAMEROON v. NIGERIA), PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS (NIGERIA v. CAMEROON)


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AJIBOLA


APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (UKRAINE v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)


CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PULAU LIGITAN AND PULAU SIPADAN


CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PULAU LIGITAN AND PULAU SIPADAN (INDONESIA/MALAYSIA)


SOVEREIGNTY OVER PULAU LIGITAN AND PULAU SIPADAN (INDONESIA/MALAYSIA) APPLICATION BY THE PHILIPPINES FOR PERMISSION TO INTERVENE


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOROMA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE PARRA-ARANGUREN


DECLARATION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE WEERAMANTRY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE FRANCK


DECLARATION OF JUDGE ODA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FRANCK


(REPUBLIC OF GUINEA v. DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO)


CASE CONCERNING AHMADOU SADIO DIALLO (REPUBLIC OF GUINEA v. DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO)


Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo)


LAGRAND CASE (GERMANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


SEPARATE OPINION OF PRESIDENT SCHWEBEL


LAGRAND (GERMANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


untitled


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT SHI


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PARRA-ARANGUREN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BUERGENTHAL


LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. BELGIUM)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE KOROMA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE HIGGINS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT WEERAMANTRY


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SHI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VERESHCHETIN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KREĆA


CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. BELGIUM)


CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO v. BELGIUM)


JOINT DECLARATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT RANJEVA, JUDGES GUILLAUME, HIGGINS, KOOIJMANS, AL-KHASAWNEH, BUERGENTHAL AND ELARABY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ELARABY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KREĆA


LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. CANADA)


APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (UKRAINE v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)


CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO v. CANADA)


CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. FRANCE)


DECLARATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT WEERAMANTRY


DECLARATION OF JUDGE SHI


DECLARATION OF JUDGE KOROMA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE VERESHCHETIN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. FRANCE)


CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO v. FRANCE)


JOINT DECLARATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT RANJEVA,


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE HIGGINS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS


LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KREĆA


CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. GERMANY)


LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. GERMANY)


CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO v. GERMANY)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ELARABY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KREĆA


LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. ITALY)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE SHI


DECLARATION OF JUDGE KOROMA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE VERESHCHETIN


DECLARATION OF JUDGE GAJA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PARRA-ARANGUREN


CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. ITALY)


CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO v. ITALY)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE HIGGINS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS


OPINION INDIVIDUELLE DE M. LE JUGE KREĆA


CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. NETHERLANDS)


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT WEERAMANTRY


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SHI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VERESHCHETIN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KREĆA


LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. NETHERLANDS)


CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE


APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (UKRAINE v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)


LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO v. NETHERLANDS)


JOINT DECLARATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT RANJEVA, JUDGES GUILLAUME, HIGGINS, KOOIJMANS, AL-KHASAWNEH, BUERGENTHAL AND ELARABY


DECLARATION OF JUDGE KOROMA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ELARABY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KREĆA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE HIGGINS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS


CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. PORTUGAL)


LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. PORTUGAL)


LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO v. PORTUGAL)


LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. SPAIN)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE SHI


DECLARATION OF JUDGE VERESHCHETIN


LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. UNITED KINGDOM)


DECLARATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT WEERAMANTRY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PARRA-ARANGUREN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KREĆA


CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. UNITED KINGDOM)


LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO v. UNITED KINGDOM)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE KOROMA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ELARABY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KREĆA


CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE (YUGOSLAVIA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


CASE CONCERNING ARMED ACTIVITIES ON THE TERRITORY OF THE CONGO


ARMED ACTIVITIES ON THE TERRITORY OF THE CONGO (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO v. BURUNDI)


ARMED ACTIVITIES ON THE TERRITORY OF THE CONGO (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO v. UGANDA)


CASE CONCERNING ARMED ACTIVITIES ON THE TERRITORY OF THE CONGO (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO v. UGANDA)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE ODA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE VERHOEVEN


Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)


ARMED ACTIVITIES ON THE TERRITORY OF THE CONGO (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO v. RWANDA)


CASE CONCERNING ARMED ACTIVITIES ON THE TERRITORY OF THE CONGO (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO v. RWANDA)


CASE CONCERNING APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA)


APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (UKRAINE v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)


APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA)


Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)


CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF 10 AUGUST 1999 (PAKISTAN v. INDIA)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOROMA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE REDDY


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AL-KHASAWNEH


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PIRZADA


CASE CONCERNING MARITIME DELIMITATION BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND HONDURAS IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA


MARITIME DELIMITATION BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND HONDURAS IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS)


Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras)


CASE CONCERNING THE ARREST WARRANT OF 11 APRIL 2000 (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO v. BELGIUM)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE ODA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE RANJEVA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PARRA-ARANGUREN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE REZEK


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BULA-BULA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE VAN DEN WYNGAERT


ARREST WARRANT OF 11 APRIL 2000 (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO v. BELGIUM)


SEPARATE OPINION OF PRESIDENT GUILLAUME


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOROMA


JOINT SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES HIGGINS, KOOIJMANS AND BUERGENTHAL


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE REZEK


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BULA-BULA


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VAN DEN WYNGAERT


APPLICATION FOR REVISION OF THE JUDGMENT OF 11 JULY 1996 IN THE CASE CONCERNING APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA v. YUGOSLAVIA), PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS (YUGOSLAVIA v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA)


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VERESHCHETIN


DECLARATION OF JUDGE REZEK


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DIMITRIJEVIĆ


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MAHIOU


CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN PROPERTY (LIECHTENSTEIN v. GERMANY)


CERTAINS BIENS (LIECHTENSTEIN c. ALLEMAGNE)


Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany)


TERRITORIAL AND MARITIME DISPUTE (NICARAGUA v. COLOMBIA)


Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia)


FORMATION OF CHAMBER


DECLARATION OF JUDGE ODA


CASE CONCERNING THE FRONTIER DISPUTE (BENIN/NIGER)


Frontier Dispute (Benin/Niger)


CASE CONCERNING ARMED ACTIVITIES ON THE TERRITORY OF THE CONGO (NEW APPLICATION: 2002) (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO v. RWANDA)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE KOROMA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE HIGGINS


DECLARATION OF JUDGE BUERGENTHAL


DECLARATION OF JUDGE ELARABY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DUGARD


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MAVUNGU


ARMED ACTIVITIES ON THE TERRITORY OF THE CONGO (NEW APPLICATION: 2002) (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO v. RWANDA)


Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (New Application: 2002) (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda)


APPLICATION FOR REVISION OF THE JUDGMENT OF 11 SEPTEMBER 1992 IN THE CASE CONCERNING THE LAND, ISLAND AND MARITIME FRONTIER DISPUTE (EL SALVADOR/HONDURAS: NICARAGUA intervening) (EL SALVADOR v. HONDURAS)


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PAOLILLO


AVENA AND OTHER MEXICAN NATIONALS (MEXICO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)


DECLARATION OF PRESIDENT SHI


DECLARATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT RANJEVA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE VERESHCHETIN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PARRA-ARANGUREN


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE TOMKA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC SEPÚLVEDA


CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN FRANCE (REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO v. FRANCE)


JOINT SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES KOROMA AND VERESHCHETIN


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DE CARA


CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN FRANCE


Certain Criminal Proceedings in France (Republic of the Congo v. France)


CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PEDRA BRANCA/PULAU BATU PUTEH, MIDDLE ROCKS AND SOUTH LEDGE (MALAYSIA/SINGAPORE)


Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore)


LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WALL IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)


LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WALL IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BUERGENTHAL


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOROMA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE HIGGINS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AL-KHASAWNEH


DECLARATION OF JUDGE BUERGENTHAL


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ELARABY


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE OWADA


MARITIME DELIMITATION IN THE BLACK SEA (ROMANIA v. UKRAINE)


Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine)


Dispute regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)


Status vis-à-vis the Host State of a Diplomatic Envoy to the United Nations (Commonwealth of Dominica v. Switzerland)


Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay)


Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v. France)


Maritime Dispute (Peru v. Chile)


Aerial Herbicide Spraying (Ecuador v. Colombia)


Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 31 March 2004 in the Case concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America) (Mexico v. United States of America)


Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. Russian Federation)


Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo


Application of the Interim Accord of 13 September 1995 (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia v. Greece)


Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening)


Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal)


Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Belgium v. Switzerland)


Judgment No.2867 of the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organization upon a Complaint Filed against the International Fund for Agricultural Development


Certain Questions concerning Diplomatic Relations (Honduras v. Brazil)


Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)


Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger)


Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)


Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 15 June 1962 in the Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand) (Cambodia v. Thailand)


Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica)


Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean (Bolivia v. Chile)


Question of the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf between Nicaragua and Colombia beyond 200 nautical miles from the Nicaraguan Coast (Nicaragua v. Colombia)


Alleged Violations of Sovereign Rights and Maritime Spaces in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Colombia)


Questions relating to the Seizure and Detention of Certain Documents and Data (Timor-Leste v. Australia)


Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)


Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. India)


Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. Pakistan)


Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. United Kingdom)


Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya)


Dispute over the Status and Use of the Waters of the Silala (Chile v. Bolivia)


Immunities and Criminal Proceedings (Equatorial Guinea v. France)


Certain Iranian Assets (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America)


Land Boundary in the Northern Part of Isla Portillos (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)


APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (UKRAINE v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)


SEPARATE OPINION OF PRESIDENT DONOGHUE


DECLARATION OF JUDGE TOMKA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE ABRAHAM


DECLARATION OF JUDGE BENNOUNA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE YUSUF


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SEBUTINDE


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BHANDARI


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE IWASAWA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE CHARLESWORTH


DECLARATION OF JUDGE BRANT


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC POCAR


SEPARATE OPINION, PARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING, OF JUDGE AD HOC TUZMUKHAMEDOV


Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation)


Application for revision of the Judgment of 23 May 2008 in the case concerning Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore) (Malaysia v. Singapore)


Jadhav (India v. Pakistan)


Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965


Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 23 May 2008 in the case concerning Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore) (Malaysia v. Singapore)


Arbitral Award of 3 October 1899 (Guyana v. Venezuela)


Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Qatar v. United Arab Emirates)


Appeal Relating to the Jurisdiction of the ICAO Council under Article 84 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation (Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates v. Qatar)


Appeal Relating to the Jurisdiction of the ICAO Council under Article II, Section 2, of the 1944 International Air Services Transit Agreement (Bahrain, Egypt and United Arab Emirates v. Qatar)


Alleged violations of the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America)


Relocation of the United States Embassy to Jerusalem (Palestine v. United States of America)


Guatemala’s Territorial, Insular and Maritime Claim (Guatemala/Belize)


Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar)


LAND AND MARITIME DELIMITATION AND SOVEREIGNTY OVER ISLANDS (GABON/EQUATORIAL GUINEA)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE YUSUF


DECLARATION OF JUDGE XUE


DECLARATION OF JUDGE AURESCU


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE TLADI


DECLARATION OF JUDGE AD HOC WOLFRUM


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC PINTO


Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Armenia v. Azerbaijan)


Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Azerbaijan v. Armenia)


Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation)


Questions of jurisdictional immunities of the State and measures of constraint against State-owned property (Germany v. Italy)


Request relating to the Return of Property Confiscated in Criminal Proceedings (Equatorial Guinea v. France)


Sovereignty over the Sapodilla Cayes (Belize v. Honduras)


LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ARISING FROM THE POLICIES AND PRACTICES OF ISRAEL IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY, INCLUDING EAST JERUSALEM


DECLARATION OF PRESIDENT SALAM


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT SEBUTINDE


DECLARATION OF JUDGE TOMKA


JOINT OPINION OF JUDGES TOMKA, ABRAHAM AND AURESCU


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE YUSUF


DECLARATION OF JUDGE XUE


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE IWASAWA


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE NOLTE


JOINT DECLARATION OF JUDGES NOLTE


DECLARATION OF JUDGE CHARLESWORTH


DECLARATION OF JUDGE BRANT


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE GÓMEZ ROBLEDO


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE CLEVELAND


DECLARATION OF JUDGE TLADI


Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem


OBLIGATIONS OF STATES IN RESPECT OF CLIMATE CHANGE


SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT SEBUTINDE


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE XUE


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BHANDARI


JOINT DECLARATION OF JUDGES BHANDARI AND CLEVELAND


DECLARATION OF JUDGE NOLTE


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE CHARLESWORTH


JOINT DECLARATION OF JUDGES CHARLESWORTH, BRANT, CLEVELAND AND AURESCU


DECLARATION OF JUDGE CLEVELAND


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AURESCU


APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE AND OTHER CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT (CANADA AND NETHERLANDS v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC)


DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT GEVORGIAN


DECLARATION OF JUDGE XUE


Canada and the Kingdom of the Netherlands


Alleged Violations of State Immunities (Islamic Republic of Iran v. Canada)


Aerial Incident of 8 January 2020 (Canada, Sweden, Ukraine and United Kingdom v. Islamic Republic of Iran)


RIGHT TO STRIKE UNDER ILO CONVENTION NO. 87 (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)


RIGHT TO STRIKE UNDER ILO CONVENTION NO. 87


SEPARATE OPINION OF PRESIDENT IWASAWA


DECLARATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT SEBUTINDE


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TOMKA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE BHANDARI


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE TLADI


APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE IN THE GAZA STRIP (SOUTH AFRICA v. ISRAEL)


DECLARATION OF JUDGE NOLTE


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC BARAK


DECLARATION OF PRESIDENT SALAM


DECLARATION OF JUDGE YUSUF


JOINT DECLARATION OF JUDGES XUE,


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE NOLTE


DECLARATION OF JUDGE CHARLESWORTH


DECLARATION OF JUDGE AURESCU


DECLARATION OF JUDGE TLADI


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC BARAK


APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE IN THE GAZA STRIP


ALLEGED BREACHES OF CERTAIN INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS IN RESPECT OF THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY (NICARAGUA v. GERMANY)


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE IWASAWA


DECLARATION OF JUDGE CLEVELAND


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC AL-KHASAWNEH


EMBASSY OF MEXICO IN QUITO


DECLARATION OF JUDGE BHANDARI


DECLARATION OF JUDGE NOLTE


DECLARATION OF JUDGE GÓMEZ ROBLEDO


EMBASSY OF MEXICO IN QUITO (MEXICO v. ECUADOR)


GLAS ESPINEL (ÉQUATEUR c. MEXIQUE)


OBLIGATIONS OF ISRAEL IN RELATION TO THE PRESENCE AND ACTIVITIES OF THE UNITED NATIONS, OTHER INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND THIRD STATES IN AND IN RELATION TO THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY


OBLIGATIONS OF ISRAEL IN RELATION TO THE PRESENCE AND ACTIVITIES OF THE UNITED NATIONS, OTHER INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND THIRD STATES IN AND IN RELATION TO THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)


JOINT DECLARATION OF JUDGES ABRAHAM AND CLEVELAND


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE XUE


DECLARATION OF JUDGE CHARLESWORTH


SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BRANT


PARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GÓMEZ ROBLEDO


DECLARATION OF JUDGE TLADI


APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE IN SUDAN (SUDAN v. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES)


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE YUSUF


OF JUDGES BHANDARI, CHARLESWORTH, GÓMEZ ROBLEDO,


DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GÓMEZ ROBLEDO


DECLARATION OF JUDGE AD HOC SIMMA


APPEAL RELATING TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE ICAO COUNCIL UNDER ARTICLE 84 OF THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. CANADA, SWEDEN, UKRAINE AND UNITED KINGDOM)


APPEAL RELATING TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE ICAO COUNCIL UNDER ARTICLE 84 OF THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION


KOHLER AND PARIS (FRANCE v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN)


ALLEGED SMUGGLING OF MIGRANTS (LITHUANIA v. BELARUS)