File size: 2,477 Bytes
6b07fdb 4d2b3c3 6b07fdb |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 |
---
license: mit
---
# NeurIPS Papers Dataset
This dataset contains information about NeurIPS conference paper submissions including peer reviews, author rebuttals, and decision outcomes across multiple years.
## Files
- `dataset.csv`: Main dataset file containing all paper submission data
## Dataset Structure
The CSV file contains the following columns:
- `title`: Paper title
- `paper_decision`: Decision outcome (Accept/Reject with specific categories)
- `review_1`, `review_2`, etc.: Peer reviews from different reviewers
- `rebuttals_1`, `rebuttals_2`, etc.: Author rebuttals responding to reviews
- `global_rebuttals`: Overall author responses
- `dataset_source`: Source of the data
- `conference_year`: Year of the conference
## Usage
```python
import pandas as pd
# Load the dataset
df = pd.read_csv('merged_neurips_dataset.csv')
# Example: Print first paper title
print(df['title'].iloc[0])
# Example: Filter accepted papers
accepted_papers = df[df['paper_decision'].str.contains('Accept', na=False)]
print(f"Number of accepted papers: {len(accepted_papers)}")
# Example: Analyze decision distribution
decision_counts = df['paper_decision'].value_counts()
print(decision_counts)
```
## Sample Data Structure
Each row represents a paper submission with associated reviews and rebuttals:
```
title: "Stress-Testing Capability Elicitation With Password-Locked Models"
paper_decision: "Accept (poster)"
review_1: "Summary: The paper studies whether fine-tuning can elicit..."
rebuttals_1: "Rebuttal 1: Thanks for the review! We are glad you found..."
...
```
## Data Statistics
- **File size**: ~287MB
- **Format**: CSV with comma-separated values
- **Encoding**: UTF-8
- **Contains**: Paper reviews, rebuttals, and metadata from NeurIPS conferences
## Use Cases
This dataset is valuable for:
- **Peer review analysis**: Study patterns in academic peer review
- **Natural language processing**: Train models on academic text
- **Research evaluation**: Analyze correlation between reviews and acceptance
- **Academic writing**: Understand successful paper characteristics
- **Sentiment analysis**: Analyze reviewer sentiment and author responses
## Citation
If you use this dataset in your research, please cite appropriately and ensure compliance with NeurIPS terms of service.
## License
This dataset is released under the MIT License. Please ensure you have appropriate permissions to use this data and comply with NeurIPS's terms of service.
|