MatBar99 commited on
Commit
0f52b7f
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 14cb8c7

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +245 -55
README.md CHANGED
@@ -12,102 +12,292 @@ size_categories:
12
  ---
13
  # Dataset Card for HALAS
14
 
 
15
 
16
- ### Dataset Summary
17
- <!-- Provide a quick summary of the dataset. -->
18
- It is human annotated dataset ....
19
 
20
- ### Dataset Details
21
 
22
- Dataset contains of 3611 files with corrected anotations that are used in.
23
 
24
- ### Dataset Description
25
 
26
- <!-- Provide a longer summary of what this dataset is. -->
27
- This dataset consists of human annotated hallucinations which has occured on audio from https://huggingface.co/datasets/distil-whisper/earnings22.
28
- Hallucination anotations were performed on 9 popular ASR models and based on their prediction we chose the most differential audio files.
 
 
29
 
30
- In a process of anotation, we marked words and phrases in resulted transcriptions as hallucinations. We use taxonomy of "Hallucination", "Looping", "Hallucination Looping".
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
31
 
 
32
 
 
33
 
34
- Finally, we corrected text references provided by Earnings22 dataset.
35
 
 
36
 
37
- - **License:** [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
38
 
39
- ### Dataset Sources [optional]
40
 
41
- <!-- Provide the basic links for the dataset. -->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
42
 
43
- - **Repository:**
44
- - **Paper:** [More Information Needed]
 
45
 
 
46
 
47
- ### Data Fields
48
 
49
- - audio_id
50
- - audio_duration
51
- - e22_reference_text
52
- - corrected_reference_text
53
- - **model**_prediction
54
- - **model**_label
55
- - **model**_hallucination_text
56
- - **model**_hallucination_json
57
- - split
58
 
59
- where **model** is corresponding to the following models:
60
 
61
- - whisper_large_v2
62
- - whisper_large_v3
63
- - whisper_large_v3_turbo
64
- - crisper_whisper
65
- - canary
66
- - canary_flash
67
- - parakeet
68
- - phi4
69
- - granite
70
 
 
71
 
72
- ### Data Splits
73
 
74
- train: 2866 files
75
 
76
- test: 745 files
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
77
 
78
  ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
79
 
80
- <!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
81
 
82
- [More Information Needed]
83
 
84
- ### Recommendations
85
 
86
- <!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
 
 
 
 
87
 
88
- Users should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the dataset. More information needed for further recommendations.
89
 
90
- ## Citation [optional]
91
 
92
- <!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the dataset, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
93
 
94
- **BibTeX:**
95
 
96
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
97
 
98
- **APA:**
99
 
100
- [More Information Needed]
101
 
 
102
 
103
- ## More Information [optional]
104
 
105
- [More Information Needed]
106
 
107
- ## Dataset Card Authors [optional]
 
 
108
 
109
- [More Information Needed]
110
 
111
  ## Dataset Card Contact
112
 
113
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
12
  ---
13
  # Dataset Card for HALAS
14
 
15
+ ## Dataset Summary
16
 
17
+ **HALAS (Hallucination Annotations for Large-scale ASR Systems)** is a human-annotated dataset of hallucinations produced by modern automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems on real-world speech recordings. The dataset contains span-level hallucination annotations for ASR outputs generated from recordings in the Earnings22 corpus.
 
 
18
 
19
+ HALAS was introduced to address a key limitation in prior hallucination research: most existing hallucination detection and mitigation methods are evaluated on non-speech audio or artificially corrupted speech. In contrast, HALAS captures **naturally occurring hallucinations on authentic speech recordings**, enabling realistic evaluation of hallucination detection, mitigation, and analysis methods.
20
 
21
+ The dataset contains annotations of ASR outputs generated by multiple state-of-the-art speech recognition systems and provides both utterance-level labels and span-level annotations identifying hallucinated content.
22
 
23
+ HALAS is intended as a benchmark for:
24
 
25
+ - ASR hallucination detection
26
+ - Hallucination mitigation research
27
+ - Error analysis of speech recognition systems
28
+ - Evaluation of reference-based and reference-free hallucination metrics
29
+ - Development of robust ASR systems
30
 
31
+ ---
32
+
33
+ ## Dataset Details
34
+
35
+ The dataset contains **3,611 audio files** from the Earnings22 dataset with manually verified and corrected annotations.
36
+
37
+ For each audio segment, predictions from multiple state-of-the-art ASR models were collected and independently reviewed by human annotators. Hallucinated spans, looping errors, and hallucination-looping errors were labeled at the text-span level.
38
+
39
+ In addition, reference transcripts provided by Earnings22 were manually revalidated and corrected when necessary.
40
+
41
+ ---
42
+
43
+ ## Dataset Description
44
+
45
+ HALAS consists of human-annotated hallucinations occurring in ASR transcriptions generated from recordings in the Earnings22 dataset:
46
+
47
+ https://huggingface.co/datasets/distil-whisper/earnings22
48
+
49
+ The dataset was created using outputs from state-of-the-art ASR systems applied to naturally occurring earnings-call recordings containing speakers from 27 countries and a wide range of recording conditions.
50
+
51
+ To maximize the prevalence of hallucinations in the annotation pool, candidate audio segments were selected using **inter-model disagreement**. Predictions from multiple ASR systems were compared using average pairwise Word Error Rate (WER), and segments with the highest disagreement were prioritized for annotation.
52
+
53
+ The annotation process focused exclusively on the relationship between the audio signal and the ASR prediction. Annotators were instructed **not** to rely on the reference transcript when identifying hallucinations.
54
+
55
+ A hallucination was defined as:
56
+
57
+ > A prediction, or fragment thereof, that has no phonetic correspondence with the content of the audio signal analyzed by the ASR model.
58
+
59
+ Annotators marked words or phrases using the following taxonomy:
60
+
61
+ ### Hallucination
62
+
63
+ A word or phrase that does not correspond to any spoken content in the audio recording.
64
+
65
+ ### Looping
66
+
67
+ An erroneous repetition of a word or phrase that is present in the speech signal.
68
+
69
+ ### Hallucination Looping
70
 
71
+ An erroneous repetition of content that is itself hallucinated and does not correspond to the audio signal.
72
 
73
+ Each audio file was annotated independently by two annotators, with disagreements resolved by a third annotator acting as an arbitrator.
74
 
75
+ In addition to hallucination annotation, all reference transcripts were manually reviewed and corrected when necessary. During this process, approximately 14% of examples were identified as partially inaudible or ambiguous.
76
 
77
+ The resulting dataset contains:
78
 
79
+ - Human-annotated hallucination spans
80
+ - Human-annotated looping spans
81
+ - Human-annotated hallucination-looping spans
82
+ - Corrected reference transcripts
83
+ - Utterance-level hallucination labels
84
+ - Predictions from multiple ASR systems
85
 
86
+ Importantly, HALAS was intentionally constructed to contain a high proportion of hallucinations and therefore **does not represent the real-world prevalence of ASR hallucinations**. However, all hallucinations originate from genuine speech recordings rather than synthetic corruption or non-speech inputs.
87
 
88
+ ---
89
+
90
+ ## Supported Tasks
91
+
92
+ - Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR)
93
+ - Hallucination Detection
94
+ - Hallucination Mitigation
95
+ - Error Detection
96
+ - Speech Recognition Evaluation
97
+ - Speech Processing Research
98
 
99
+ ---
100
+
101
+ ## Languages
102
 
103
+ - English
104
 
105
+ The source recordings originate from earnings-call recordings featuring speakers from 27 countries.
106
 
107
+ ---
108
+
109
+ ## License
110
+
111
+ **TODO:** Replace with the final license used in the public release.
112
+
113
+ The publication does not explicitly specify the dataset license. Because HALAS is derived from the Earnings22 dataset and includes additional human annotations, users should consult the official repository for licensing details.
114
+
115
+ ---
116
 
117
+ ## Dataset Sources
118
 
119
+ ### Repository
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
120
 
121
+ **TODO:** Add the public GitHub repository URL.
122
 
123
+ ### Paper
124
 
125
+ **HALAS: A Human-Annotated Dataset of Hallucinations of Modern ASR Systems**
126
 
127
+ Mateusz Barański, Jan Jasiński, Julitta Bartolewska, Marcin Witkowski, and Konrad Kowalczyk.
128
+
129
+ Accepted at Interspeech 2026.
130
+
131
+ ---
132
+
133
+ ## Data Fields
134
+
135
+ The dataset contains the following fields:
136
+
137
+ | Field | Description |
138
+ |---------|-------------|
139
+ | `audio_id` | Unique identifier of the audio segment from Earnings22 |
140
+ | `audio_duration` | Duration of the audio segment in seconds |
141
+ | `e22_reference_text` | Original reference transcript provided by Earnings22 |
142
+ | `corrected_reference_text` | Human-corrected reference transcript |
143
+ | `model_prediction` | ASR prediction generated by the corresponding model |
144
+ | `model_label` | Utterance-level hallucination label indicating whether hallucination was present |
145
+ | `model_hallucination_text` | Text span annotated as hallucination |
146
+ | `model_hallucination_json` | Structured span annotations containing hallucination locations and categories |
147
+ | `split` | Dataset split (`train` or `test`) |
148
+
149
+ The `model` field corresponds to one of the following ASR systems:
150
+
151
+ - `whisper_large_v2`
152
+ - `whisper_large_v3`
153
+ - `whisper_large_v3_turbo`
154
+ - `crisper_whisper`
155
+ - `canary`
156
+ - `canary_flash`
157
+ - `parakeet`
158
+
159
+ If the public release additionally includes `phi4` and `granite`, please update this section accordingly.
160
+
161
+ ---
162
+
163
+ ## Annotation Methodology
164
+
165
+ ### Annotators
166
+
167
+ HALAS was annotated by **10 professional annotators** with English proficiency at B2 level or higher.
168
+
169
+ ### Annotation Procedure
170
+
171
+ For each audio sample:
172
+
173
+ 1. The audio recording was reviewed.
174
+ 2. Audio quality issues were identified (e.g., non-English speech, overlapping speakers, inaudible segments).
175
+ 3. Annotators reviewed ASR predictions while listening to the audio.
176
+ 4. Hallucinated spans were marked using the HALAS taxonomy.
177
+ 5. A second annotator independently repeated the process.
178
+ 6. A third annotator resolved disagreements and finalized annotations.
179
+
180
+ ### Quality Control
181
+
182
+ Each sample was reviewed by two independent annotators.
183
+
184
+ Agreement between annotators was high:
185
+
186
+ - Cohen's κ = 0.87
187
+
188
+ This level of agreement indicates strong consistency in hallucination identification.
189
+
190
+ Additionally, all reference transcripts were revalidated and corrected by the arbitrator.
191
+
192
+ ---
193
+
194
+ ## Data Splits
195
+
196
+ | Split | Files |
197
+ |---------|---------|
198
+ | Train | 2,866 |
199
+ | Test | 745 |
200
+
201
+ The train/test partition was created by:
202
+
203
+ - Splitting by source meeting
204
+ - Stratifying according to:
205
+ - Average WER
206
+ - Hallucination rate
207
+ - Audio duration
208
+
209
+ To ensure a stable benchmark, the test set includes only recordings:
210
+
211
+ - Longer than 1 second
212
+ - Containing at least 3 words
213
+
214
+ Dataset statistics:
215
+
216
+ | Split | Hallucination Rate |
217
+ |---------|---------|
218
+ | Train | 33.6% |
219
+ | Test | 22.6% |
220
+
221
+ ---
222
+
223
+ ## Dataset Characteristics
224
+
225
+ ### Source Audio
226
+
227
+ The source recordings originate from the Earnings22 dataset:
228
+
229
+ - Approximately 119 hours of audio
230
+ - Earnings-call recordings
231
+ - Speakers from 27 countries
232
+ - Real-world recording conditions
233
+
234
+ Candidate segments were selected from portions exhibiting high disagreement between ASR systems.
235
+
236
+ ---
237
 
238
  ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
239
 
240
+ HALAS intentionally oversamples difficult audio segments.
241
+
242
+ As a consequence:
243
+
244
+ 1. The hallucination frequency does not reflect real-world deployment conditions.
245
+ 2. The dataset is biased toward audio examples that produce disagreement among ASR systems.
246
+ 3. Results obtained on HALAS should not be interpreted as estimates of hallucination prevalence in production systems.
247
+ 4. The dataset focuses exclusively on English earnings-call recordings and may not generalize to other domains, languages, or acoustic environments.
248
+ 5. Some audio samples contain challenging conditions such as accents, low-quality recordings, or partially inaudible speech.
249
+ 6. Although references were manually corrected, certain recordings remain inherently ambiguous due to poor audio quality.
250
+
251
+ Researchers should therefore view HALAS primarily as a benchmark for hallucination detection and analysis rather than a representative sample of everyday ASR usage.
252
+
253
+ ---
254
 
255
+ ## Recommendations
256
 
257
+ Researchers using HALAS should:
258
 
259
+ 1. Report whether evaluations are performed at utterance level or span level.
260
+ 2. Account for the intentionally elevated hallucination rate when interpreting results.
261
+ 3. Distinguish hallucinations from ordinary transcription errors.
262
+ 4. Consider both structural and semantic evaluation metrics.
263
+ 5. Evaluate generalization on additional datasets whenever possible.
264
 
265
+ Because HALAS contains naturally occurring hallucinations from real speech recordings, it provides a substantially more realistic benchmark than datasets constructed from non-speech or artificially corrupted audio.
266
 
267
+ ---
268
 
269
+ ## Citation
270
 
271
+ ### BibTeX
272
 
273
+ ```bibtex
274
+ @inproceedings{baranski2026halas,
275
+ title={HALAS: A Human-Annotated Dataset of Hallucinations of Modern ASR Systems},
276
+ author={Barański, Mateusz and Jasiński, Jan and Bartolewska, Julitta and Witkowski, Marcin and Kowalczyk, Konrad},
277
+ booktitle={Proceedings of Interspeech 2026},
278
+ year={2026}
279
+ }
280
+ ```
281
 
282
+ ### APA
283
 
284
+ Barański, M., Jasiński, J., Bartolewska, J., Witkowski, M., & Kowalczyk, K. (2026). *HALAS: A Human-Annotated Dataset of Hallucinations of Modern ASR Systems*. In *Proceedings of Interspeech 2026*.
285
 
286
+ ---
287
 
288
+ ## Dataset Card Authors
289
 
290
+ Mateusz Barański, Jan Jasiński, Julitta Bartolewska, Marcin Witkowski, and Konrad Kowalczyk.
291
 
292
+ Signal Processing Group
293
+ Institute of Electronics
294
+ AGH University of Krakow, Poland
295
 
296
+ ---
297
 
298
  ## Dataset Card Contact
299
 
300
+ - Mateusz Barański — mbaranski@agh.edu.pl
301
+ - Jan Jasiński — jjasinsk@agh.edu.pl
302
+
303
+ Alternatively, please use the issue tracker in the official repository once available.