clean_preprocess_data_multilabel.csv

,summary,summary_lemma_stop,Art_5,Art_6,Art_32,otro
0,"The bank was fined 500 EUR for calling a client about the unresolved bills of his neighbor. The client then invoked his right to be forgotten, which the bank ignored at first. Another motion was started, and the client complained to the KZLD. Apparently, the bank hadn’t requested consent from the subject when processing his data.", bank     call  client   unresolved bill   neighbor  client  invoke  right   forget   bank ignore  first another motion  start   client complain   kzld apparently  bank ’ request consent   subject  process  data,1,1,0,0
1,The betting place used a system of video surveillance illegally because it filmed the public space (the sidewalk). Private individuals are not allowed to do this on a large scale like in this case., bet place use  system  video surveillance illegally   film  public space  sidewalk private individuals   allow      large scale like   case,0,0,0,1
2,"The German branch of Facebook was fined by €51,000 because it failed to appoint a data protection officer. Facebook argued that it did in fact appoint a data protection officer in Ireland who acted as a data protection officer for all the local European Facebook branches. The Data Protection Authority of Hamburg, however, argued that Facebook did not notify the German authority about this appointment, and as such, the fine is valid. The reason the fine was relatively small was that Facebook did, after all, appoint a DPO but failed to notify German authorities. The fine was given to Facebook Germany GmbH, which is the local German branch of the company.The fine was issued sometimes in 2019 but was only made public by the Data Protection Authority of Hamburg in February 2020. The exact date of the fine was not revealed.", german branch  facebook       fail  appoint  data protection officer facebook argue     fact appoint  data protection officer  ireland  act   data protection officer    local european facebook branch  data protection authority  hamburg however argue  facebook   notify  german authority   appointment       valid  reason    relatively small   facebook    appoint  dpo  fail  notify german authorities    give  facebook germany gmbh    local german branch   companythe   issue sometimes     make public   data protection authority  hamburg  february  exact date      reveal,0,0,0,1
3,"The video surveillance cameras had been misused, clearly not in accord with the data minimization principle.", video surveillance cameras   misuse clearly   accord   data minimization principle,1,0,0,0
4,"HVV GmbH had not reported a data breach to the data protection authority in due time. This data breach was related to the security gap in the Customer E-Service, in that that clients with an HVV card who logged in the CES could access the data of other customers by changing the URL to match their data profile.",hvv gmbh   report  data breach   data protection authority  due time  data breach  relate   security gap   customer eservice    clients   hvv card  log   ces could access  data   customers  change  url  match  data profile,0,0,0,1
5,Personal data was disclosed to a third party. No further details were revealed.,personal data  disclose   third party   detail  reveal,0,1,0,0
6,"The data controller could not provide access to personal information to a patient because the dossier could not be identified. The patient complained to the Commissioner about this, and the hospital was fined 5.000 Euros.", data controller could  provide access  personal information   patient   dossier could   identify  patient complain   commissioner     hospital   euros,1,1,0,0
7,"Leave.EU subscriber emails contained marketing ads related to the GoSkippy services of the Eldon Insurance firm. The data subjects did not give their consent to this, hence the fine issued by the ICO.",leaveeu subscriber email contain market ads relate   goskippy service   eldon insurance firm  data subject   give  consent   hence   issue   ico,0,0,0,1
8,"A newspaper was fined €10,000 after it had published both in electronic and physical form the names and pictures of three police investigators. The Cypriot Data Protection Commissioner considered that it would have been enough to publish only the initials of the police officers or photographs from which it would not have been possible to identify the three officials, such as using blurred faces. ", newspaper       publish   electronic  physical form  name  picture  three police investigators  cypriot data protection commissioner consider   would   enough  publish   initial   police officer  photograph    would    possible  identify  three officials   use blur face ,0,1,0,0
9,"The taxi company was discovered having over 9 million person records that it stored unlawfully. Because the company hadn’t deleted this personal data, the Danish Data Protection Authority issued a fine.", taxi company  discover   million person record   store unlawfully   company ’ delete  personal data  danish data protection authority issue  ,0,0,0,1
10,"A bank had retained the personal data of former customers in order to create a blacklist. Apparently, they wanted to prevent those customers from opening up new accounts at their bank because they were suspected of money laundering. While the bank wanted to hand-wave away this unlawful act by appealing to the German Banking Act, the Berlin Supervisory Authority found this to be illegal.", bank  retain  personal data  former customers  order  create  blacklist apparently  want  prevent  customers  open  new account   bank    suspect  money launder   bank want  handwave away  unlawful act  appeal   german bank act  berlin supervisory authority find    illegal,0,1,0,0
11,"The data controller could not provide access to personal information to a patient because the dossier could not be identified. The patient complained to the Commissioner about this, and the hospital was fined 5.000 Euros.", data controller could  provide access  personal information   patient   dossier could   identify  patient complain   commissioner     hospital   euros,0,0,0,1
12,"The company had sent a number of emails to a significant number of recipients without using the BCC feature that would have hid the email addresses of all the recipients from each other. The original fine was set at €60,000 but reduced to €36,000.", company  send  number  email   significant number  recipients without use  bcc feature  would  hide  email address    recipients     original   set    reduce  ,1,0,0,0
13,"Further fines of between €6,000 and €17,000 were issues to the company due to the faulty storage of personal data. See the separate entry about Deutsche Wohnen SE.",        issue   company due   faulty storage  personal data see  separate entry  deutsche wohnen se,1,0,0,0
14,The Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection and the Freedom of Information (NAIH) concluded that the local authority of the city of Kerepes didn't follow GDPR regulations when it installed a security camera. The Authority explained that the processing of the data was not in accordance with provisions of the GDPR., hungarian national authority  data protection   freedom  information naih conclude   local authority   city  kerepes didnt follow  regulations   instal  security camera  authority explain   process   data    accordance  provision   ,0,1,0,0
15,"Vueling Airlines made it impossible for users to access their website without accepting the cookies. Therefore, one couldn’t browse the website unless they accepted the cookies. The AEPD sanctioned the company with 30.000 euros",vueling airlines make  impossible  users  access  website without accept  cookies therefore one ’ browse  website unless  accept  cookies  aepd sanction  company  euros,1,1,0,0
16,"No concrete details have been released at this point other than a fine of €150,000 was imposed in November 2019. We will update this card once further information emerges.", concrete detail   release   point        impose  november   update  card   information emerge,0,1,0,0
17,"A printed checklist used to verify the attendance of breakfast customers (approx. 46 clients) was photographed by unauthorized people. As a result, the personal data of those clients was disclosed to the public. The operator working for the hotel was sanctioned because of insufficient security measures.", print checklist use  verify  attendance  breakfast customers approx clients  photograph  unauthorized people   result  personal data   clients  disclose   public  operator work   hotel  sanction   insufficient security measure,0,0,1,0
18,"An ex-employee of a public area maintenance company complained that his work was unlawfully monitored by CCTV cameras controlled by the employer. While the employer argued that CCTV monitoring was required to assess the work performance of the employee and provide protection of the surveillance system, the NAIH argued back. The data processing authority argued that CCTV monitoring wasn’t appropriate to assess the work performance and the employer had no legal basis to do so. Moreover, to protect the public area surveillance system, the employer could have used other methods that didn’t invade the employee’s private space.", exemployee   public area maintenance company complain   work  unlawfully monitor  cctv cameras control   employer   employer argue  cctv monitor  require  assess  work performance   employee  provide protection   surveillance system  naih argue back  data process authority argue  cctv monitor ’ appropriate  assess  work performance   employer   legal basis    moreover  protect  public area surveillance system  employer could  use  methods  ’ invade  employee’ private space,1,1,0,0
19,"A company was fined with €294,000 because of the ""unnecessarily long"" storage and retention of personal data in the selection of personnel. During the selection process, even health data was requested, which was excessive according to the DPA.", company        unnecessarily long storage  retention  personal data   selection  personnel   selection process even health data  request   excessive accord   dpa,1,0,0,0
20,Ikea Ibérica was found to have installed cookies on a customer's device without asking for permission.,ikea ibérica  find   instal cookies   customers device without ask  permission,0,1,0,0
21,The company did not comply with measures imposed by the Data Protection Authority., company   comply  measure impose   data protection authority,0,0,0,1
22,"After an inspection in 2018 when irregularities were noticed, the company IDdesign was fined. The company had overused the data of over 380.000 customers for a longer period of time than they were allowed to, as per the initial goals of the data processing. Moreover, the company had no clear deadlines regarding the deletion of personal data. The controller had also ignored the necessity of having a clear policy on the data deletion procedures.",  inspection   irregularities  notice  company iddesign    company  overuse  data   customers   longer period  time    allow   per  initial goals   data process moreover  company   clear deadlines regard  deletion  personal data  controller  also ignore  necessity    clear policy   data deletion procedures,1,0,0,0
23,"The data subjects complained that the bank with which they’d concluded a credit agreement had sold its claim to a third party while also transferring the relevant personal data to the third-party company (controller). The NAIH determined that the data controller can’t rely on the performance of the credit contract or the consent of the data subjects for the data processing since the data subjects had concluded this contract with the bank, not with the data controller. Thus, the data controller has no legal basis for the data processing.", data subject complain   bank   ’ conclude  credit agreement  sell  claim   third party  also transfer  relevant personal data   thirdparty company controller  naih determine   data controller ’ rely   performance   credit contract   consent   data subject   data process since  data subject  conclude  contract   bank    data controller thus  data controller   legal basis   data process,1,1,0,0
24,"A fine of €1,022 was imposed on a national telecom company for the unlawful processing of the personal data of a citizen. The personal data of the individual was unlawfully accessed and processed in order to cancel a contract.",     impose   national telecom company   unlawful process   personal data   citizen  personal data   individual  unlawfully access  process  order  cancel  contract,0,1,0,0
25,A private enforcement agent was fined for the unlawful processing of personal data of an individual. The agent had conducted video surveillance on the individual and refused to grant access to the collected data. The affected individual submitted an application to access their personal data but the enforcement agent rejected this request and refused to motivate this decision., private enforcement agent     unlawful process  personal data   individual  agent  conduct video surveillance   individual  refuse  grant access   collect data  affect individual submit  application  access  personal data   enforcement agent reject  request  refuse  motivate  decision,0,0,0,1
26,"A fine of €11,760 was issued on the commercial representative of a national telecommunications provider due to the unlawful processing of the personal data of a client. The commercial representative unlawfully processed the data of a client with the goal of closing a contract for mobile telephoning services.",     issue   commercial representative   national telecommunications provider due   unlawful process   personal data   client  commercial representative unlawfully process  data   client   goal  close  contract  mobile telephone service,0,1,0,0
27,"The National Revenue Agency was fined with €28,100 because of the unlawful processing of personal data of a private individual. The personal data of the individual was unlawfully collected and used in an enforcement case against them in order to recover a tax debt of €86,000. The National Revenue Agency also collected bank account data of the affected individual from the Bulgarian National Bank. The Bulgarian DPA argued that this data was collected unlawfully by the National Revenue Agency. This is one of the very rare cases where a DPA fines a government institution for the unlawful processing of personal data.", national revenue agency        unlawful process  personal data   private individual  personal data   individual  unlawfully collect  use   enforcement case    order  recover  tax debt    national revenue agency also collect bank account data   affect individual   bulgarian national bank  bulgarian dpa argue   data  collect unlawfully   national revenue agency   one    rare case   dpa   government institution   unlawful process  personal data,0,0,0,1
28,"A fine of €5,113 was imposed on a national telecom company for the unlawful processing of the personal data of a citizen. The personal data of the individual was unlawfully accessed and processed in order to cancel a contract.",     impose   national telecom company   unlawful process   personal data   citizen  personal data   individual  unlawfully access  process  order  cancel  contract,0,1,0,0
29,The company was fined because it collected personal data without providing accurate information about its data processing activities on their privacy policy page on their website., company     collect personal data without provide accurate information   data process activities   privacy policy page   website,0,0,0,1
30,An insurance company sent advertising emails to clients without the necessary consent., insurance company send advertise email  clients without  necessary consent,0,1,0,0
31,"The Data Protection Authority of Rheinland-Pfalz issued a fine of €105,000 after a hospital after a mixup of patients. As a consequence of this, wrong invoices were issues to the patients that released sensitive personal data.", data protection authority  rheinlandpfalz issue       hospital   mixup  patients   consequence   wrong invoice  issue   patients  release sensitive personal data,1,0,0,0
32,The company did not process the data using the appropriate security measures required to prevent unlawful alteration or destruction of the data., company   process  data use  appropriate security measure require  prevent unlawful alteration  destruction   data,0,0,1,0
33,"The company sold a card that was constantly tracked through GPS. The owner found this out and reported it since the company had no information related to this GPS tracking. The Czech Data Protection Authority decreed that this was a violation of Art. 5 (1) of the GDPR, and issued a fine.", company sell  card   constantly track  gps  owner find    report  since  company   information relate   gps track  czech data protection authority decree             issue  ,1,0,0,0
34,"A local representative took a picture of the director of a government-owned company while he was tearing (allegedly) off an election poster belonging to the opposition, in the company of his child. The picture was uploaded to Facebook by the representative. While the child’s face was blurred, the representative hinted that it was the director’s daughter. In turn, the director complained that he did not agree or consent to the taking of this photo. NAIH deemed the act of the director to be non-public. Moreover, the photo did not conclusively prove that the director was tearing off the poster.", local representative take  picture   director   governmentowned company    tear allegedly   election poster belong   opposition   company   child  picture  upload  facebook   representative   child’ face  blur  representative hint     director’ daughter  turn  director complain     agree  consent   take   photo naih deem  act   director   nonpublic moreover  photo   conclusively prove   director  tear   poster,1,1,0,0
35,"The financial institution refused the data erasure request of a customer, arguing that it was in the institution’s best interests to retain the phone number, given that the customer had debts. However, the NAIH argued that the creditor could communicate with the debtor by post, and the phone number was unnecessary. The financial institution had broken the data minimization and purpose limitation principles. A fine was issued equal to 0.025% of the institution’s annual net revenue.", financial institution refuse  data erasure request   customer argue      institution’ best interest  retain  phone number give   customer  debts however  naih argue   creditor could communicate   debtor  post   phone number  unnecessary  financial institution  break  data minimization  purpose limitation principles    issue equal  %   institution’ annual net revenue,1,1,0,0
36,"The fine was issued because, in April 2019, the company hadn’t taken the necessary measures to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of information (as per Art. 5 para. 1 lit. f GDPR) when it disposed of documents that contained personal information of two clients. We should mention that the documents were simply disposed of in the general waste recycling system where they were found by a neighbor.",   issue   april  company ’ take  necessary measure  ensure  integrity  confidentiality  information  per  para light f    dispose  document  contain personal information  two clients   mention   document  simply dispose    general waste recycle system    find   neighbor,1,0,1,0
37,A data controller failed to allow the data subject access., data controller fail  allow  data subject access,0,0,0,1
38,"A private person sent several emails containing the email addresses of several subjects, and each subject could see other recipients of that email. In the person’s mailing list, more than 131 email addresses had been found. He was accused of ten such offenses.", private person send several email contain  email address  several subject   subject could see  recipients   email   person’ mail list   email address   find   accuse  ten  offenses,1,1,0,0
39,"The political party did not notify the NAIH about a data breach. Moreover, it didn’t document the data breach as per GDPR article 33.5. Therefore, the political party received a fine of HUF 11.000.000 (equivalent to 34.375 EUR). The hacker behind the breach had used a redirection attack on the official website of the political party and disclosed information about more than 6.000 people.", political party   notify  naih   data breach moreover  ’ document  data breach  per  article therefore  political party receive     equivalent    hacker behind  breach  use  redirection attack   official website   political party  disclose information    people,0,0,0,1
40,"The company had not imposed sufficient security measures, which led to the unauthorized access of personal information related to the people who had made transactions with the website avocatoo.ro. This information includes names, emails, phone numbers, jobs, surnames, mailing addresses, and transaction details). Documents dated 10th of November 2018 – 1st of February 2019 had become publicly accessible to anyone. The company was sanctioned following a notification by the National Supervisory Authority when transaction details were publicly accessible via two links. ", company   impose sufficient security measure  lead   unauthorized access  personal information relate   people   make transactions   website avocatooro  information include name email phone number job surnames mail address  transaction detail document date th  november – st  february  become publicly accessible  anyone  company  sanction follow  notification   national supervisory authority  transaction detail  publicly accessible via two link ,0,0,1,0
41,The private person has an insufficient legal basis for using a dashcam to record public road traffic and publish it on YouTube as being part of a compilation., private person   insufficient legal basis  use  dashcam  record public road traffic  publish   youtube   part   compilation,1,1,0,0
42,"A customer complained that their bank account was charged for two invoices for the services the customer has purchased but on the invoices, the personal details of a third party person were displayed. Initially, the fine was determined to be €60,000 but was reduced to €48,000.", customer complain   bank account  charge  two invoice   service  customer  purchase    invoice  personal detail   third party person  display initially    determine      reduce  ,1,0,0,0
43,A police officer used a witnesse's personal data to contact her., police officer use  witness personal data  contact ,0,1,0,0
44,"Vodafone sent customers invoicing details to a third party after a customer invoicing complaint. The fine was originally determined to be €75,000 but later reduced to €60,000 after the quick cooperation of the company.",vodafone send customers invoice detail   third party   customer invoice complaint    originally determine     later reduce     quick cooperation   company,0,1,0,0
45,The company collected personal data without accurate information regarding the collection of this data., company collect personal data without accurate information regard  collection   data,0,0,0,1
46,BD was fined with €511 because it failed to provide access to information which the national DPA requested in order to resolve a complaint.,bd       fail  provide access  information   national dpa request  order  resolve  complaint,0,0,0,1
47,"Due to technical errors, the personal data of 8.000 customers wasn't deleted upon request",due  technical errors  personal data  customers wasnt delete upon request,0,0,0,1
48,"Despite the clear refusal of telemarketing calls by the customers, the company proceeded to ignore this because of technical errors.",despite  clear refusal  telemarketing call   customers  company proceed  ignore    technical errors,1,0,0,0
49,The company TODOTECNICOS24H collected personal data without accurate information regarding the collection of this data., company todotecnicosh collect personal data without accurate information regard  collection   data,0,0,0,1
50,"The bank erroneously sent the subject’s credit card data to another person via SMS. Despite the data subject’s request to erase the data, the bank continued to send SMS messages to that incorrect telephone number. The bank was fined about 0.00016% of the annual net revenue.", bank erroneously send  subject’ credit card data  another person via sms despite  data subject’ request  erase  data  bank continue  send sms message   incorrect telephone number  bank    %   annual net revenue,1,0,0,0
51,"The medical centers unlawfully processed personal data of the subject G.B. Software was used to generate the registration form for changing the GP, and it went ahead to the Regional Health Insurance Fund. After it arrived at another medical center, it was concluded that all parts had taken part in the unlawful processing of data.", medical center unlawfully process personal data   subject gb software  use  generate  registration form  change  gp   go ahead   regional health insurance fund   arrive  another medical center   conclude   part  take part   unlawful process  data,1,1,0,0
52,Video surveillance was used to monitor employees.,video surveillance  use  monitor employees,1,0,0,0
53,Video surveillance was used to monitor employees.,video surveillance  use  monitor employees,1,0,0,0
54,"Several owners of real estate complained that the government office improperly announced the change of the lessee (the person that concludes lease agreements with real estate owners). Thus, the government office posted its decision to other real estate owners contracted by the same lessee. The post contained personal data of all the owners who had contracts with the same lessee.",several owners  real estate complain   government office improperly announce  change   lessee  person  conclude lease agreements  real estate owners thus  government office post  decision   real estate owners contract    lessee  post contain personal data    owners   contract    lessee,1,0,0,0
55,The Bulgarian Interior Ministry was fined due to the unlawful processing of the personal data of a citizen. The Interior Ministry unlawfully sent the personal data of the citizen to the Togolese Republic., bulgarian interior ministry   due   unlawful process   personal data   citizen  interior ministry unlawfully send  personal data   citizen   togolese republic,0,1,0,0
56,"The police officer acted outside the boundaries of the law when he used the Central Traffic Information System to find out the personal data of the license plate of an unknown person. Moreover, he then proceeded with a SARS inquiry, gathering personal data of the injured parties (mobile and home phone numbers). The police officer then contacted the wounded party. These actions were done outside his lawful prerogatives, and it is an infringement of personal data. However, he acted not in trying to exercise official duties but to satisfy personal inquiries. Therefore, the police department is not to blame.", police officer act outside  boundaries   law   use  central traffic information system  find   personal data   license plate   unknown person moreover   proceed   sars inquiry gather personal data   injure party mobile  home phone number  police officer  contact  wound party  action   outside  lawful prerogatives     infringement  personal data however  act   try  exercise official duties   satisfy personal inquiries therefore  police department    blame,0,1,0,0
57,Raiffeisen Bank Romania did not observe the necessary security measures required by the GDPR when it assessed the scores of individuals on the WhatsApp platform. The personal data was exchanged via WhatsApp.,raiffeisen bank romania   observe  necessary security measure require      assess  score  individuals   whatsapp platform  personal data  exchange via whatsapp,0,0,1,0
58,The Company sent personal information through the WhatsApp platform to Raiffeisen Bank in order to facilitate the assessment of personal scores. The results were returned on the same platform., company send personal information   whatsapp platform  raiffeisen bank  order  facilitate  assessment  personal score  result  return    platform,0,0,1,0
59,"The telecom company 1&1 Telecom GmbH was fined with €9,550,000 after it came to light that sensitive customer information could be obtained by phone by anyone by just telling a client's name and date of birth. This could have permitted anyone to obtain the personal information of any customer in case they knew their name and date of birth. The BfDI considered that the company failed to implement the necessary technical measures to ensure the protection of personal data. The BfDI further revealed that the fine was intended to be much larger but was eventually decreased due to the cooperation of the company during the investigation.", telecom company telecom gmbh       come  light  sensitive customer information could  obtain  phone  anyone   tell  clients name  date  birth  could  permit anyone  obtain  personal information   customer  case  know  name  date  birth  bfdi consider   company fail  implement  necessary technical measure  ensure  protection  personal data  bfdi  reveal     intend   much larger   eventually decrease due   cooperation   company   investigation,0,0,1,0
60,"The Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (BfDI) ha repeatedly requested the company to appoint a data protection officer in accordance with Article 37 GDPR but even so, Rapidata GmbH refused to do so. The company was fined with €10,000.", federal commissioner  data protection  freedom  information bfdi ha repeatedly request  company  appoint  data protection officer  accordance  cle   even  rapidata gmbh refuse     company    ,0,0,0,1
61,"The employer complained that the former company where he/she worked for refused to delete personal information posted on Facebook. Even after the termination of the employment contract, the company did not delete the personal information of the former employee.", employer complain   former company  / work  refuse  delete personal information post  facebook even   termination   employment contract  company   delete  personal information   former employee,0,1,0,0
62,"Morele.net was sanctioned with a fine of PLN 2.8 million because it hadn’t ensured the proper security standards of customers’ data. As a consequence, more than 2.2 million people had their personal data accessed illegally.",morelenet  sanction     pln million   ’ ensure  proper security standards  customers’ data   consequence   million people   personal data access illegally,0,0,1,0
63,The company sent advertising emails to multiple recipients where every one of the recipients was able to see the email address of all other recipients. This was because the sender sent all the email addresses as CC instead of BCC., company send advertise email  multiple recipients  every one   recipients  able  see  email address    recipients     sender send   email address  cc instead  bcc,0,0,1,0
64,The company was fined because it operated a video surveillance system that had an observation angle that extended too far into the public traffic area. The video surveillance system was also not accompanied by any data protection notices., company     operate  video surveillance system    observation angle  extend  far   public traffic area  video surveillance system  also  accompany   data protection notice,1,0,0,0
65,"Three fined were issued on Hora Credit IFN SA because personal data of an individual was transmitted through email to a third party. The following investigation revealed that the company processed personal data without any means to validate the accuracy and authenticity of the data collected and processed. The operator also did not employ enough technical and organizational measures to protect the collected personal data. The case was made worse by the fact that the company did not notify the ANSPDCP after the data breach was discovered, as required by the law. The three fined issued were of €3,000, €10,000 and €1,000 for all the three issues of non-compliance discovered by the ANSPDCP.",three   issue  hora credit ifn sa  personal data   individual  transmit  email   third party  follow investigation reveal   company process personal data without  mean  validate  accuracy  authenticity   data collect  process  operator also   employ enough technical  organizational measure  protect  collect personal data  case  make worse   fact   company   notify  anspdcp   data breach  discover  require   law  three  issue          three issue  noncompliance discover   anspdcp,1,0,1,0
66,"A fine was issued to the National Football League (LaLiga) because it had failed to inform users of the implications contained within the app it offered. This app remotely accessed the users' microphones once every minute to check pubs screening football matches. The AEPD thinks that the users were not sufficiently informed of this. Moreover, the users did not have the adequate possibility to withdraw their consent, once given.",   issue   national football league laliga    fail  inform users   implications contain within  app  offer  app remotely access  users microphones  every minute  check pubs screen football match  aepd think   users   sufficiently inform   moreover  users     adequate possibility  withdraw  consent  give,1,0,0,0
67,"The employer restored and accessed the mailbox of a former employee without first notifying him of this. The employee had no time to copy or delete any personal data included in the former inbox. The NAIH mentions that, in such a case where an employer accesses the employee’s data, the employee or a representative of the employee should be present, even in the case where the employment is terminated. Moreover, the employee has the right to demand a copy or the deletion of the private data. Simultaneously, the employer is obligated to record the access with minutes and photos when the employee is not present. Last but not least, the employer must adopt the necessary internal policies on the archiving and use of relevant IT devices and e-mail accounts.", employer restore  access  mailbox   former employee without first notify     employee   time  copy  delete  personal data include   former inbox  naih mention     case   employer access  employee’ data  employee   representative   employee   present even   case   employment  terminate moreover  employee   right  demand  copy   deletion   private data simultaneously  employer  obligate  record  access  minutes  photos   employee   present last   least  employer must adopt  necessary internal policies   archive  use  relevant  devices  email account,1,1,0,0
68,"A company did not delete a former employee's private emails and as such, it was determined that it processed private data without a legal basis. The company also was found to exceed data retention requirements. As per Hungarian laws, the name of the fined company was not disclosed by the national data protection authority.", company   delete  former employees private email      determine   process private data without  legal basis  company also  find  exceed data retention requirements  per hungarian laws  name    company   disclose   national data protection authority,0,1,0,0
69,"A huge fine of €27,8 million was issued to the Italian telecom company TIM. The Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) revealed that TIM was fined due to numerous unlawful data processing activities related to marketing and advertising, which included unsolicited promotional calls and prize competitions in which data subjects were entered without consent.One of the reasons for the large fine was the fact that the unlawful data processing activities involved several million individuals. One individual, for example, was called a total of 155 times in a month while TIM refused to add the affected individual on a no-call list even after several requests. The DPA determined that the company lacked control over the call centers and did not have adequate measures to add people to no-call lists.TIM also did not provide accurate and detailed enough privacy policies and data processing policies, and as such consumers were not efficiently informed about the data collected and processed. The company's management of data breaches was also not efficient according to Garante.Besides the fine, Garante also imposed 20 corrective measures according to Art. 58(2) GDPR which prohibits TIM from processing marketing-related data of those individuals who have refused to receive promotional calls, individuals who asked to be blacklisted and individuals who are not clients of TIM.The company was also forbidden from using customer data collected from the ""My Tim"", ""Tim Personal"" and ""Tim Smart Kid"" apps.", huge    million  issue   italian telecom company tim  italian data protection authority garante reveal  tim   due  numerous unlawful data process activities relate  market  advertise  include unsolicited promotional call  prize competitions   data subject  enter without consentone   reason   large    fact   unlawful data process activities involve several million individuals one individual  example  call  total  time   month  tim refuse  add  affect individual   nocall list even  several request  dpa determine   company lack control   call center     adequate measure  add people  nocall liststim also   provide accurate  detail enough privacy policies  data process policies    consumers   efficiently inform   data collect  process  company management  data breach  also  efficient accord  garantebesides   garante also impose corrective measure accord     prohibit tim  process marketingrelated data   individuals   refuse  receive promotional call individuals  ask   blacklist  individuals    clients  timthe company  also forbid  use customer data collect    tim tim personal  tim smart kid apps,0,0,0,1
70,"The data subject received hundreds of SMS messages and unsolicited calls, a result of the unlawful data processing of the company.", data subject receive hundreds  sms message  unsolicited call  result   unlawful data process   company,1,1,0,0
71,"H&M operates in a service center in Nuremberg and is based in Hamburg. The Hamburg data protection officer discovered that, since 2014, specific details about the lives of some employees of H&M were comprehensively recorded and stored as information on a network drive. In one of these cases, the company devised a “Welcome Back Talk” after its employees had returned from a vacation or an illness. All the information that the company obtained during this time, including specific information about the illnesses and medical diagnoses of the employees, were retained and stored. The Hamburg data protection officer also found that the H&M supervisors obtained general information about its employees “through the grapevine”, such as religious beliefs and family problems. All the information stored on the network drive was made accessible to over 50 managers of H&M, and they used it to evaluate the work performance and efficiency of all employees, as well as make employment decisions. This fact became known when the H&M servers encountered a technical error, and the data on the network drive became accessible to all employees for a few hours. The management subsequently apologized to all affected employees and offered monetary compensation in return for this offence. The data protection authority established more robust protective measures to prevent such incidents from happening again.",hm operate   service center  nuremberg   base  hamburg  hamburg data protection officer discover  since specific detail   live   employees  hm  comprehensively record  store  information   network drive  one   case  company devise  “welcome back talk”   employees  return   vacation   illness   information   company obtain   time include specific information   illnesses  medical diagnose   employees  retain  store  hamburg data protection officer also find   hm supervisors obtain general information   employees “  grapevine”   religious beliefs  family problems   information store   network drive  make accessible   managers  hm   use   evaluate  work performance  efficiency   employees  well  make employment decisions  fact become know   hm servers encounter  technical error   data   network drive become accessible   employees    hours  management subsequently apologize   affect employees  offer monetary compensation  return   offence  data protection authority establish  robust protective measure  prevent  incidents  happen ,1,1,0,0
72,Fined for failing to comply with an order of the supervisory authority.,   fail  comply   order   supervisory authority,0,0,0,1
73,Fined for failing to comply with an order of the supervisory authority.,   fail  comply   order   supervisory authority,0,0,0,1
74,"A client of Iberdrola Clientes received an electricity bill issued on the name, address and bank account of another client. Iberdrola Clientes had not employed the necessary security and organizational measures to ensure that the data processing was done correctly. Thus, the company violated the principles of data confidentiality and integrity. Initially, the company was fined €40,000 but due to its confirmation of voluntary payment, the fine was reduced to €24,000.", client  iberdrola clientes receive  electricity bill issue   name address  bank account  another client iberdrola clientes   employ  necessary security  organizational measure  ensure   data process   correctly thus  company violate  principles  data confidentiality  integrity initially  company     due   confirmation  voluntary payment    reduce  ,1,0,0,0
75,The data subject continued to receive marketing calls despite the fact the he/she requested the company to stop processing his/her personal data., data subject continue  receive market call despite  fact  / request  company  stop process / personal data,0,0,0,1
76,"The company in question had no legal basis to process the personal data of another company, despite the apparently justified reason of assessing its credibility. The personal data related to the owner of the company assessed.", company  question   legal basis  process  personal data  another company despite  apparently justify reason  assess  credibility  personal data relate   owner   company assess,1,1,0,0
77,"The company hadn’t informed the AEPD in due time or in a sufficient manner, despite the fact that it made efforts in remedying a data breach. Thus, the company was issued a fine of €4,800 by the AEPD, which was reduced to €3,600 when the company agreed to pay the fine voluntarily.", company ’ inform  aepd  due time    sufficient manner despite  fact   make efforts  remedy  data breach thus  company  issue       aepd   reduce     company agree  pay   voluntarily,0,0,0,1
78,"Following a complaint from a woman to Comercio Online Levante, the Spanish AEPD discovered that the woman in question received access to the personal information of another user when accessing her personal user account of the online store perfumespremium.es.",follow  complaint   woman  comercio online levante  spanish aepd discover   woman  question receive access   personal information  another user  access  personal user account   online store perfumespremiumes,1,0,1,0
79,"Losada Advocats S.L. violated Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR, Art. 32 GDPR by sending an e-mail to dozens of recipients, without including them on the BCC list (Blind Carbon Copy).",losada advocats sl violate   f     send  email  dozens  recipients without include    bcc list blind carbon copy,1,0,1,0
80,The association unlawfully published personal data of data subjects on its website. The specific personal data had been recorded during a previous legal proceeding without the data subjects’ consent., association unlawfully publish personal data  data subject   website  specific personal data   record   previous legal proceed without  data subjects’ consent,0,1,0,0
81,"The company unlawfully concluded a contract in the name of the data subject without obtaining consent from the data subject first. Moreover, the data subject learned of this matter when he/she received a complaint about a breach of his/her contractual obligations. The AEPD concluded that the company had unlawfully processed the data subject’s personal data.", company unlawfully conclude  contract   name   data subject without obtain consent   data subject first moreover  data subject learn   matter  / receive  complaint   breach  / contractual obligations  aepd conclude   company  unlawfully process  data subject’ personal data,0,1,0,0
82,"Vodafone España sent invoices of a client that contained personal data such as name, ID card number, and address to their neighbor.",vodafone españa send invoice   client  contain personal data   name id card number  address   neighbor,1,0,0,0
83,"The company continued to send emails to individuals even after the affected individuals have requested to be removed from the company's database or be added to a ""no-contact"" list.", company continue  send email  individuals even   affect individuals  request   remove   company database   add   nocontact list,1,1,0,0
84,"An employee of Automocion had created a fake profile of one of his coworkers on an erotic website. The profile contained her contact details, photos of her, and her sexual preferences. The data subject received several phone calls because of that profile. The employee who created the profile was found to have a personality disorder.", employee  automocion  create  fake profile  one   coworkers   erotic website  profile contain  contact detail photos     sexual preferences  data subject receive several phone call    profile  employee  create  profile  find    personality disorder,1,1,0,0
85,"The company has sent several advertising messages to a person, even after the affected person made it clear that they do not consent to their personal data to be processed.", company  send several advertise message   person even   affect person make  clear     consent   personal data   process,1,1,0,0
86,The company was fined because it processed personal data without the consent of the affected parties., company     process personal data without  consent   affect party,1,1,0,0
87,Vodafone España has signed a contract regarding the transfer of a phone subscription with a third party person without the account holder's knowledge or permission. The account holder received an email from the third party regarding the purchase that was made in his name.,vodafone españa  sign  contract regard  transfer   phone subscription   third party person without  account holders knowledge  permission  account holder receive  email   third party regard  purchase   make   name,1,1,0,0
88,"The Spanish Data Protection Authority revealed that Xfera Moviles S.A. has unlawfully processed data that included bank details, customer address as well as name of various individuals.", spanish data protection authority reveal  xfera moviles sa  unlawfully process data  include bank detail customer address  well  name  various individuals,1,1,0,0
89,"A private individual created a fake profile of a female colleague on an erotic website. The profile contained the affected person's contact details and pictures as well as information of sexual nature. The affected person then received several phone calls from several people who were inquiring about the fake profile. The person who created the fake profile was found to have a personality disorder and as such the fine was reduced from €1,000 to €800.", private individual create  fake profile   female colleague   erotic website  profile contain  affect persons contact detail  picture  well  information  sexual nature  affect person  receive several phone call  several people   inquire   fake profile  person  create  fake profile  find    personality disorder       reduce    ,1,1,0,0
90,"A customer complained that the company had processed their personal data without their consent because an email was sent to them on behalf of a company regarding the purchase of a service that was actually not bought by the respective individual. The personal details of the individuals were incorporated into Vodafone España's systems without the consent of that individual. Initially, the fine was determined to be €100,000 but was reduced to €60,000.", customer complain   company  process  personal data without  consent   email  send    behalf   company regard  purchase   service   actually  buy   respective individual  personal detail   individuals  incorporate  vodafone españas systems without  consent   individual initially    determine      reduce  ,1,1,0,0
91,A former customer of the company continued to receive invoice notices even after the contractual obligation between the two parties has ended. The company indicated a technical error for the issuing of the unsolicited notices., former customer   company continue  receive invoice notice even   contractual obligation   two party  end  company indicate  technical error   issue   unsolicited notice,1,1,0,0
92,"The Royal Dutch Tennis Association (""KNLTB"") was fined a total of €525,000 for selling the personal data of more than 350,000 of its members to sponsors. The sponsors have then contacted some of these individuals by email and telephone for marketing purposes. Personal data sold included the name, gender, and address of various individuals. No consent was obtained from the affected individuals beforehand. The Royal Dutch Tennis Association (""KNLTB"") argued that it had a legitimate interest to sell this data, and as such did not commit a GDPR breach. The Dutch Data Protection Authority, however, rejected this and ruled that KNLTB had no legal basis to sell the personal data of its members to third parties.", royal dutch tennis association knltb    total    sell  personal data      members  sponsor  sponsor   contact    individuals  email  telephone  market purpose personal data sell include  name gender  address  various individuals  consent  obtain   affect individuals beforehand  royal dutch tennis association knltb argue     legitimate interest  sell  data      commit   breach  dutch data protection authority however reject   rule  knltb   legal basis  sell  personal data   members  third party,1,1,0,0
93,The website of the company did not contain a privacy policy or a cookie banner., website   company   contain  privacy policy   cookie banner,0,0,0,1
94,A client's personal data was accessed without authorization. The AEPD explained that this happened due to lack of technical and organizational measures taken by the company to ensure information security., clients personal data  access without authorization  aepd explain   happen due  lack  technical  organizational measure take   company  ensure information security,0,0,1,0
95,"The company sent a text message to a person's phone number informing them that their contract was modified. The affected person, however, was not actually a Vodafone client. The AEPD determined that Vodafone had processed the affected person's personal details without consent.", company send  text message   persons phone number inform    contract  modify  affect person however   actually  vodafone client  aepd determine  vodafone  process  affect persons personal detail without consent,1,0,0,0
96,The company sent two SMS messages to a person informing them about the rate change of a contract as well as the purchase of a mobile phone. The customer did not consent to the processing of their personal data and Vodafone sent the text messages without prior written consent from the customer., company send two sms message   person inform    rate change   contract  well   purchase   mobile phone  customer   consent   process   personal data  vodafone send  text message without prior write consent   customer,1,1,0,0
97,"The company was fined €134,000 because of security breaches in its voice mailbox function.", company      security breach   voice mailbox function,0,0,1,0
98,"The data subject attempted to use its right to access according to Art. 15 GDPR, when it received telephone calls related to a candidacy for parliamentary elections. The data subject didn’t receive any information regarding the right to access.", data subject attempt  use  right  access accord      receive telephone call relate   candidacy  parliamentary elections  data subject ’ receive  information regard  right  access,0,0,0,1
99,"The Municipality of Bergen notified the Data Protection Authority in October 2019 of a data breach concerning the communication between school and home, a tool called “Vigilo”. Apparently, this tool was improperly secured to adequately protect personal data against any potential threats.", municipality  bergen notify  data protection authority  october   data breach concern  communication  school  home  tool call “vigilo” apparently  tool  improperly secure  adequately protect personal data   potential threats,1,0,1,0
100,"The company processed the personal data of the data subject despite the termination of the contractual relationships between the two parties, which is a violation of Art. 28 (3) g) GDPR.", company process  personal data   data subject despite  termination   contractual relationships   two party        g ,1,1,0,0
101,"The company unlawfully processed a data subject’s personal data due to a mix-up in the correct assignment of the customer contracts. Moreover, Vodafone imposed a debt from the data subject for this particular issue of mixing up the customers.", company unlawfully process  data subject’ personal data due   mixup   correct assignment   customer contract moreover vodafone impose  debt   data subject   particular issue  mix   customers,1,1,0,0
102,"The hospital failed to implement the necessary organizational and technical measures to ensure proper information security. The Swedish DPA found that the hospital carried out no risk analyses regarding access to patient data. The hospital information systems (Cosmic, Nationell patienttoversikt, and TakeCare) had not assigned the authorization for users according to the principle of minimum access. All the users had full access to all patient data, irrespective of work purposes or not.", hospital fail  implement  necessary organizational  technical measure  ensure proper information security  swedish dpa find   hospital carry   risk analyse regard access  patient data  hospital information systems cosmic nationell patienttoversikt  takecare   assign  authorization  users accord   principle  minimum access   users  full access   patient data irrespective  work purpose  ,1,0,1,0
103,"The doctor had no privacy policy on his website, which is a violation of Art. 13 GDPR. The original fine was in the amount of EUR 4,000, though it was reduced to EUR 2,400 because the responsible party immediately acknowledged the debt and paid it in full.", doctor   privacy policy   website         original     amount   though   reduce     responsible party immediately acknowledge  debt  pay   full,0,0,0,1
104,"The hospital failed to implement the necessary organizational and technical measures to ensure proper information security. The Swedish DPA found that the hospital carried out no risk analyses regarding access to patient data. The hospital information system TakeCare had not assigned the authorization for users according to the principle of minimum access. All the users had full access to all patient data, irrespective of work purposes or not.", hospital fail  implement  necessary organizational  technical measure  ensure proper information security  swedish dpa find   hospital carry   risk analyse regard access  patient data  hospital information system takecare   assign  authorization  users accord   principle  minimum access   users  full access   patient data irrespective  work purpose  ,1,0,1,0
105,"The Aleris Sjukvård AB failed to implement the necessary organizational and technical measures to ensure proper information security. The Swedish DPA found that the company carried out no risk analyses regarding access to patient data. The hospital information system TakeCare had not assigned the authorization for users according to the principle of minimum access. All the users had full access to all patient data, irrespective of work purposes or not.", aleris sjukvård ab fail  implement  necessary organizational  technical measure  ensure proper information security  swedish dpa find   company carry   risk analyse regard access  patient data  hospital information system takecare   assign  authorization  users accord   principle  minimum access   users  full access   patient data irrespective  work purpose  ,1,0,1,0
106,"The Aleris Sjukvård AB failed to implement the necessary organizational and technical measures to ensure proper information security. The Swedish DPA found that the company carried out no risk analyses regarding access to patient data. The hospital information system Nationell patienttoversikt had not assigned the authorization for users according to the principle of minimum access. All the users had full access to all patient data, irrespective of work purposes or not.", aleris sjukvård ab fail  implement  necessary organizational  technical measure  ensure proper information security  swedish dpa find   company carry   risk analyse regard access  patient data  hospital information system nationell patienttoversikt   assign  authorization  users accord   principle  minimum access   users  full access   patient data irrespective  work purpose  ,1,0,1,0
107,"The Östergötland Region failed to implement the necessary organizational and technical measures to ensure proper information security. The Swedish DPA found that the company carried out no risk analyses regarding access to patient data. The hospital information system Cosmic had not assigned the authorization for users according to the principle of minimum access. All the users had full access to all patient data, irrespective of work purposes or not. ", östergötland region fail  implement  necessary organizational  technical measure  ensure proper information security  swedish dpa find   company carry   risk analyse regard access  patient data  hospital information system cosmic   assign  authorization  users accord   principle  minimum access   users  full access   patient data irrespective  work purpose   ,1,0,1,0
108,"The Municipality had published a student file on its website, which contained personal data about the student. The Data Protection Authority imposed a fine of NOK 200,000 (EUR 18,840) on the municipality.", municipality  publish  student file   website  contain personal data   student  data protection authority impose    nok     municipality,0,1,1,0
109,"The hospital failed to implement the necessary organizational and technical measures to ensure proper information security. The Swedish DPA found that the hospital carried out no risk analyses regarding access to patient data. The hospital information systems Melior and Nationell patienttoversikt had not assigned the authorization for users according to the principle of minimum access. All the users had full access to all patient data, irrespective of work purposes or not. Moreover, the Melior information system did not keep any records of when or for what purpose the patient data was accessed.", hospital fail  implement  necessary organizational  technical measure  ensure proper information security  swedish dpa find   hospital carry   risk analyse regard access  patient data  hospital information systems melior  nationell patienttoversikt   assign  authorization  users accord   principle  minimum access   users  full access   patient data irrespective  work purpose   moreover  melior information system   keep  record      purpose  patient data  access,1,0,1,0
110,"According to the AEPD, Cafetería Nagasaki did not comply with its obligations under the GDPR because it installed surveillance cameras in such a way that it also monitored the public space outside of the restaurant which also captured pedestrians on the street.",accord   aepd cafetería nagasaki   comply   obligations      instal surveillance cameras    way   also monitor  public space outside   restaurant  also capture pedestrians   street,1,1,0,0
111,"A local government representative took an unlawful photo of the director of a company tearing off a poster depicting the opposition. Moreover, the director was accompanied by his child. The local representative posted the picture on Facebook and, even though he blurred the child’s face, he alluded the child to be the daughter of the director. When the photo was taken, the company director told the representative that he does not consent to the photo being taken. NAIH concluded that the photo doesn’t directly prove that the director ripped off an election poster, and even that was not a public act. The Data Protection Authority also claimed that only the name of the director was public information and nothing else.", local government representative take  unlawful photo   director   company tear   poster depict  opposition moreover  director  accompany   child  local representative post  picture  facebook  even though  blur  child’ face  allude  child    daughter   director   photo  take  company director tell  representative     consent   photo  take naih conclude   photo ’ directly prove   director rip   election poster  even     public act  data protection authority also claim    name   director  public information  nothing else,1,1,0,0
112,"The company disallowed the data protection authority to conduct an inspection, thus violating Article 31 and Article 58(1)(e) and (f) of the GDPR.", company disallow  data protection authority  conduct  inspection thus violate cle  cle e  f   ,0,0,0,1
113,"Biometric fingerprint scanners were used in a school in Gdansk (Poland) to authenticate students into the school's payment processing system. While the parents have given written consent to the processing of this kind of data, the Polish National Personal Data Protection Office (UODO) argued that the data processing was nevertheless unlawful, as the consent was obtained involuntarily. It was argued that the school required the consent, otherwise, it would not have been able to process student's payments at all, meaning parents had no choice other than to ""consent"".",biometric fingerprint scanners  use   school  gdansk poland  authenticate students   school payment process system   parent  give write consent   process   kind  data  polish national personal data protection office uodo argue   data process  nevertheless unlawful   consent  obtain involuntarily   argue   school require  consent otherwise  would    able  process students payments   mean parent   choice    consent,1,0,0,0
114,"The AEPD determined that the data subject received several SMS messages from a separate telephone operator regarding the activation of a new contract. Apparently, an employee from Vodafone Espana had activated a contract with a third-party operator without informing the data subject first. Evidently, they couldn’t demonstrate that they had asked for consent from the data subject with regard to the data processing.", aepd determine   data subject receive several sms message   separate telephone operator regard  activation   new contract apparently  employee  vodafone espana  activate  contract   thirdparty operator without inform  data subject first evidently  ’ demonstrate    ask  consent   data subject  regard   data process,1,1,0,0
115,"The company did not respond in time to the data protection authorities’ requests for an AEPD with information related to a complain. This was a breach of the Art. 58 GDPR and the company was fined €4,000 as a result.", company   respond  time   data protection authorities’ request   aepd  information relate   complain    breach       company      result,0,0,0,1
116,"The data controller denied access to personal health data to the data subject, going against Art. 15 GDPR.", data controller deny access  personal health data   data subject go    ,0,0,0,1
117,The supermarket’s operator displayed a letter of dismissal to the personnel manager on the public notice board of the supermarket., supermarket’ operator display  letter  dismissal   personnel manager   public notice board   supermarket,1,1,0,0
118,"During a sale of real estate, the company distributed USB sticks to tenants containing personal data of other persons, including lease agreements and other confidential data.",  sale  real estate  company distribute usb stick  tenant contain personal data   persons include lease agreements   confidential data,1,0,1,0
119,Vodafone informed a data subject of the porting of a phone number which the data subject had not requested or confirmed.,vodafone inform  data subject   port   phone number   data subject   request  confirm,1,1,0,0
120,"The company failed to delete the e-mail account of the data subject despite the data subject’s employment termination. Moreover, the company had automatically forwarded the incoming e-mails. When the data subject demanded access and erasure of the e-mail account, the company failed to respond at all and didn’t provide any information at all.", company fail  delete  email account   data subject despite  data subject’ employment termination moreover  company  automatically forward  incoming email   data subject demand access  erasure   email account  company fail  respond    ’ provide  information  ,1,1,0,0
121,The Data Protection Authority discovered that the company did not employ the necessary technical and organizational measures to properly secure the information. This information is related to the copies of identification documents regarding clients that the company’s employees transmitted via WhatsApp to one another., data protection authority discover   company   employ  necessary technical  organizational measure  properly secure  information  information  relate   copy  identification document regard clients   company’ employees transmit via whatsapp  one another,0,0,1,0
122,"The restaurant had installed a CCTV system that unlawfully monitored the public space, besides the required restaurant space.", restaurant  instal  cctv system  unlawfully monitor  public space besides  require restaurant space,1,0,0,0
123,The school had placed personal data about pupils on the public notice board., school  place personal data  pupils   public notice board,1,1,0,0
124,"A bank employee unlawfully made a copy of a client’s identity card who wanted to exchange €100 in foreign currency. The employee stated that they did that in accordance with money laundering laws. However, these laws apply only to sums above €100.", bank employee unlawfully make  copy   client’ identity card  want  exchange   foreign currency  employee state      accordance  money launder laws however  laws apply   sum  ,1,1,0,0
125,The company had sent unsolicited marketing SMS messages without obtaining the consent of the recipients., company  send unsolicited market sms message without obtain  consent   recipients,1,1,0,0
126,"The online retailer Spartoo recorded telephone hotline conversations, including bank details of orders and addresses. Moreover, the company also stored partially unencrypted bank details in its databases. The Data Protection Authority deemed this to be a violation of the principle of data minimization, as well as a violation of the information obligations of Art. 13 GDPR, since the company’s data protection information that it supplied to clients was partially incorrect.", online retailer spartoo record telephone hotline conversations include bank detail  order  address moreover  company also store partially unencrypted bank detail   databases  data protection authority deem        principle  data minimization  well      information obligations    since  company’ data protection information   supply  clients  partially incorrect,1,0,0,0
127,"The data subject complained to the DPA that the company had unlawfully issued invoices to him, and also collected the respective amounts from his bank account, without the data subject even being a customer of the company. The complaints against the company have yet to meet with any legal success.", data subject complain   dpa   company  unlawfully issue invoice    also collect  respective amount   bank account without  data subject even   customer   company  complaints   company  yet  meet   legal success,1,1,0,0
128,"The utility company unlawfully processed the data subject’s data as part of an enforcement case related to outstanding payment obligations. The data subject, V.V, suffered damages because of this, as the bailiff seized their salary. In the end, the utility company was fined €5,110 because of the unlawful processing of personal data.", utility company unlawfully process  data subject’ data  part   enforcement case relate  outstanding payment obligations  data subject vv suffer damage      bailiff seize  salary   end  utility company       unlawful process  personal data,0,1,0,0
129,The television station broadcasted a documentary about prostitution in Switzerland where the involved people who were interviewed were not anonymized sufficiently., television station broadcast  documentary  prostitution  switzerland   involve people   interview   anonymized sufficiently,1,1,0,0
130,A private person unlawfully used CCTV cameras. The AEPD revealed that the CCTC camera system used by the individual for home protection also filmed part of a public space., private person unlawfully use cctv cameras  aepd reveal   cctc camera system use   individual  home protection also film part   public space,1,0,0,0
131,"The school unlawfully published health data of over 2,000 teachers on its website.", school unlawfully publish health data   teachers   website,1,1,0,0
132,The school unlawfully published health data of multiple teachers on its website., school unlawfully publish health data  multiple teachers   website,1,1,0,0
133,The retailer had not clearly declared the utilization of video surveillance., retailer   clearly declare  utilization  video surveillance,0,0,0,1
134,"BKR only allowed data subjects to request their data once per years free of charge and by post only. For subsequent data requests it required people to pay a fee – something that violates GDPR, which states that data subjects can request access to their personal data free of charge any number of times they wish.",bkr  allow data subject  request  data  per years free  charge   post   subsequent data request  require people  pay  fee something  violate   state  data subject  request access   personal data free  charge  number  time  wish,0,0,0,1
135,"The company had installed a cookie policy on the website, offering no information regarding the purpose of the cookies, their properties, or the time they would remain active in the user’s device.", company  instal  cookie policy   website offer  information regard  purpose   cookies  properties   time  would remain active   user’ device,0,0,0,1
136,"The company failed to grant access to personal data of a data subject, breaching Art. 15 GDPR.", company fail  grant access  personal data   data subject breach   ,0,0,0,1
137,"The company was fined to the unlawful processing of personal data without having the sufficient legal basis, due to the incorrect information related to the owners of prepaid phone cards (the confusion was between the actual owners of the prepaid cards and the registered owners in the company’s business register).", company     unlawful process  personal data without   sufficient legal basis due   incorrect information relate   owners  prepay phone card  confusion    actual owners   prepay card   register owners   company’ business register,1,1,0,0
138,The company used a personal photo of the data subjects for marketing purposes without a sufficient legal basis., company use  personal photo   data subject  market purpose without  sufficient legal basis,1,1,0,0
139,The company failed to cooperate and comply with the AEPD when demanded specific information and documentation., company fail  cooperate  comply   aepd  demand specific information  documentation,0,0,0,1
140,The company was fined because it sent a contract that included the name and address and contact details of a client to a third party by accident., company     send  contract  include  name  address  contact detail   client   third party  accident,1,0,0,0
141,"The company was fined because it processed personal data such as name, tax identification number, address and phone number without the consent of the affected individuals.", company     process personal data   name tax identification number address  phone number without  consent   affect individuals,0,1,0,0
142,"The company was fined because it processed personal data in regards to a gas contract without the applicants' consent. The investigation revealed that the applicant received an invoice for the supplying of natural gas, a contract which they didn't sign. EDP Comercializadora argued that since the applicant had a contract with another gas company with which EDP Comercializadora had a collaboration agreement, it was justified to process the personal data of the respective individuals. The AEPD, however, ruled that the company was required to receive permission directly from the affected individuals to process personal data.", company     process personal data  regard   gas contract without  applicants consent  investigation reveal   applicant receive  invoice   supply  natural gas  contract   didnt sign edp comercializadora argue  since  applicant   contract  another gas company   edp comercializadora   collaboration agreement   justify  process  personal data   respective individuals  aepd however rule   company  require  receive permission directly   affect individuals  process personal data,0,1,0,0
143,The organization processed personal data of its members even after the AEPD warned it that the processing was unlawful without the consent of the affected individuals., organization process personal data   members even   aepd warn    process  unlawful without  consent   affect individuals,0,1,0,0
144,"The Institute published personal data of subjects, including inter alia, notes about health, and progress in school, on the Institute website. This was due to a technical error.", institute publish personal data  subject include inter alia note  health  progress  school   institute website   due   technical error,1,0,1,0
145,The former mayor sent unlawful election advertisements to citizens., former mayor send unlawful election advertisements  citizens,1,1,0,0
146,"One of the AVASB security committee members sent WhatsApp messages containing personal information about employees, to private phone numbers. This constitutes a violation of the confidentiality principle which states that not only is the data controller obligated to respect it but everyone else involved in the data processing.",one   avasb security committee members send whatsapp message contain personal information  employees  private phone number  constitute     confidentiality principle  state      data controller obligate  respect   everyone else involve   data process,1,0,0,0
147,"During a municipal election in the year 2018, the data controller was found guilty of sending election advertisements by means of a list of contacts that had unlawfully accessed. The recipients of the advertisements were employee in the same municipal administration.",  municipal election   year  data controller  find guilty  send election advertisements  mean   list  contact   unlawfully access  recipients   advertisements  employee    municipal administration,1,1,0,0
148,"A private notebook of a University employee, containing personal data of study candidates at SGGW, was stolen.", private notebook   university employee contain personal data  study candidates  sggw  steal,0,0,1,0
149,"The company sent personal data related to the registration to an online course, to other participants. This was due to a technical error.", company send personal data relate   registration   online course   participants   due   technical error,1,0,1,0
150,The company did not provide information to the AEPD in relation to an investigation., company   provide information   aepd  relation   investigation,0,0,0,1
151,"The data subjects kept receiving SMS messages in the form of a debt reminder, despite the fact that the debt had been paid in full.", data subject keep receive sms message   form   debt reminder despite  fact   debt   pay  full,1,1,0,0
152,The complainant explained that they had sent a letter to the management of the hotel and union delegates that contained information related to an episode of alleged harassment in relation to a medical condition. The hotel management then read the contents of the letter in a meeting with other employees. This constituted a violation of the principle of integrity and confidentiality., complainant explain    send  letter   management   hotel  union delegate  contain information relate   episode  allege harassment  relation   medical condition  hotel management  read  content   letter   meet   employees  constitute     principle  integrity  confidentiality,1,0,0,0
153,"The property owner unlawfully captured the public roads via a CCTV camera, breaching the principle of data minimization.", property owner unlawfully capture  public roads via  cctv camera breach  principle  data minimization,1,0,0,0
154,"One of the sales representatives of the company didn’t properly check the identity of the claimant, which means he took on the data subject’s identity so he could order a telephone connection for four telephone lines in the data subject’s name.",one   sales representatives   company ’ properly check  identity   claimant  mean  take   data subject’ identity   could order  telephone connection  four telephone line   data subject’ name,0,1,0,0
155,The attorney submitted a set of documents on the back of which were written the personal data of certain parties., attorney submit  set  document   back    write  personal data  certain party,0,0,1,0
156,"The company was fined because it didn’t enough legal basis to use video surveillance on the business premises. Moreover, the company also lacked sufficient information when it used cookies on its official website.", company     ’ enough legal basis  use video surveillance   business premise moreover  company also lack sufficient information   use cookies   official website,0,0,0,1
157,"The company failed to appoint a data protection officer that would receive the data subjects’ requests. Moreover, the company’s website didn’t have any information related to the data protection officer’s contact details.", company fail  appoint  data protection officer  would receive  data subjects’ request moreover  company’ website ’   information relate   data protection officer’ contact detail,0,0,0,1
158,A customer complained about receiving SMS messages from Xfera Moviles related to the non-payment and subsequent suspension of services of the account of another data subject unrelated to the customer., customer complain  receive sms message  xfera moviles relate   nonpayment  subsequent suspension  service   account  another data subject unrelated   customer,1,0,0,0
159,"The data subject demanded that his data was deleted from the records of the National Association of Financial Credit Institutions (ASNEF). However, Equifax Iberica denied his right by saying that the complainant was excessive in another previous request of data deletion. The data protection authority deemed this to be a violation of the data subject’s right for data deletion under the GDPR, and as a breach of blocking obligations under the national data protection laws.", data subject demand   data  delete   record   national association  financial credit institutions asnef however equifax iberica deny  right  say   complainant  excessive  another previous request  data deletion  data protection authority deem        data subject’ right  data deletion       breach  block obligations   national data protection laws,0,0,0,1
160,The data subject received marketing messages without his consent., data subject receive market message without  consent,1,1,0,0
161,A CCTV camera was unlawfully used in a shop without the proper information., cctv camera  unlawfully use   shop without  proper information,0,0,0,1
162,"The property owner unlawfully used a CCTV camera to capture the public roads, thus violating the principle of data minimization.", property owner unlawfully use  cctv camera  capture  public roads thus violate  principle  data minimization,1,0,0,0
163,"The company did not take the necessary organizational and security measures, which led to the unauthorized publication on Facebook of a certain document that contained access details to personal data of 436 customers of Proleasing Motors SLR.", company   take  necessary organizational  security measure  lead   unauthorized publication  facebook   certain document  contain access detail  personal data  customers  proleasing motor slr,0,0,1,0
164,"The company unlawfully published information containing the names and surnames of its employees. The data subject’s financial situates was illegally disclosed, as a result.", company unlawfully publish information contain  name  surnames   employees  data subject’ financial situate  illegally disclose   result,1,0,0,0
165,"The responsible party was fined for having transferred the data subject’s personal data to Evo Finance EFC, SA while processing a health insurance application, without being within its legal rights to do so, since the specific medical treatment was not carried out yet.", responsible party     transfer  data subject’ personal data  evo finance efc sa  process  health insurance application without  within  legal right    since  specific medical treatment   carry  yet,1,1,0,0
166,"The restaurant used a CCTV that also captured public space, which is a violation of the principle of data minimization.", restaurant use  cctv  also capture public space       principle  data minimization,1,0,0,0
167,The private person was fined for using a CCTV camera that captured the foreign space of a neighbour., private person    use  cctv camera  capture  foreign space   neighbour,1,1,0,0
168,"Xfera Movies S.A. had insufficient legal basis to process personal data of a client who was registered as having two telephone and internet connections under his/her name. There was also a charge account attached to this. The data subjects claim they never signed any such contracts with the company. The AEPD discovered that the contracts had been concluded by fraudulent means (by third parties) using the personal data of the data subjects. However, the AEPD still considered that it was the company’s responsibility to verify whether the contracts in question had been lawfully and in concluded in good honesty by the actual data subjects, and whether the data subjects had given their consent for the collection and processing of their personal data.",xfera movies sa  insufficient legal basis  process personal data   client   register   two telephone  internet connections  / name   also  charge account attach    data subject claim  never sign   contract   company  aepd discover   contract   conclude  fraudulent mean  third party use  personal data   data subject however  aepd still consider     company’ responsibility  verify whether  contract  question   lawfully   conclude  good honesty   actual data subject  whether  data subject  give  consent   collection  process   personal data,0,1,0,0
169,"The company violated Art. 5 GDPR by sending an e-mail to a third party, regarding the dismissing and settlement document of the data subject, thus unlawfully disclosing the data subject’s personal data without their express consent.", company violate    send  email   third party regard  dismiss  settlement document   data subject thus unlawfully disclose  data subject’ personal data without  express consent,1,0,0,0
170,"A work computer belonging to a city government employee was stolen. The computer contained personal data of around 1,600 city government employees as well as sensitive information such as social security numbers.", work computer belong   city government employee  steal  computer contain personal data  around city government employees  well  sensitive information   social security number,1,0,1,0
171,"A computer that belonged to the administration of the municipality was stolen. The computer was not encrypted and it included the personal identification numbers of 20,620 residents.", computer  belong   administration   municipality  steal  computer   encrypt   include  personal identification number  residents,1,0,1,0
172,"A former employee of National Center of Addiction Medicine (‘SAA') received boxes that contained personal belongings that he supposedly left there but personal data and health records of 252 former patients and documents with the names of around 3,000 individuals who once participated in an alcohol and drug abuse rehabilitation program.", former employee  national center  addiction medicine saa receive box  contain personal belong   supposedly leave   personal data  health record  former patients  document   name  around individuals   participate   alcohol  drug abuse rehabilitation program,1,0,1,0
173,A teacher had sent an email to parents and students that contained an attachment that had detailed information on the well-being and academic performance of all students., teacher  send  email  parent  students  contain  attachment   detail information   wellbeing  academic performance   students,1,0,1,0
174,"he company improperly managed personal data of data subject and erroneously disclosed it to unauthorized persons. For instance, the company disclosed personal information (location and contact data) of a mother and her child to an alleged offender, while in two other cases, the company disclosed data related to children in foster care to their blood relatives, one of which was an imprisoned father.", company improperly manage personal data  data subject  erroneously disclose   unauthorized persons  instance  company disclose personal information location  contact data   mother   child   allege offender   two  case  company disclose data relate  children  foster care   blood relatives one     imprison father,1,1,0,0
175,The company was fined because it installed security cameras that filmed the public roads. This infringed upon the principle of data minimization., company     instal security cameras  film  public roads  infringe upon  principle  data minimization,1,0,0,0
176,"The municipality received a fine of €46,660 for having processed children’s health data related to disability issues in relation to the digital learning platform “Showbie”. In this case, the municipality failed to do a DPIA (Data Protection Impact Assessment) that falls under Article 35 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), before it processed the data. Moreover, the municipality also failed to take the necessary organizational and technical measures to ensure the security of the children’s data, leading to unauthorized access to the data, thus acting in disaccord with Article 32 of the GDPR.", municipality receive       process children’ health data relate  disability issue  relation   digital learn platform “showbie”   case  municipality fail    dpia data protection impact assessment  fall  cle   general data protection regulation    process  data moreover  municipality also fail  take  necessary organizational  technical measure  ensure  security   children’ data lead  unauthorized access   data thus act  disaccord  cle   ,0,0,1,0
177,"When the company allocated a contract to a mobile phone connection to a new customer, the personal data of the old holder of the contract was made accessible. The company failed to comply with the principles of integrity and data confidentiality.",  company allocate  contract   mobile phone connection   new customer  personal data   old holder   contract  make accessible  company fail  comply   principles  integrity  data confidentiality,1,0,1,0
178,"The company violated Article 5 of the GDPR when it changed the master data of a customer to the name of a third party, namely the ex-spouse of the customer.", company violate cle      change  master data   customer   name   third party namely  exspouse   customer,1,0,0,0
179,The school breached the transparency principle., school breach  transparency principle,1,0,0,0
180,"Prior to the fine being issues, an employee accessed the health data of a concerned person. During the investigation, the data protection authority discovered that the company had infringed upon Article 32 (2) and (4) of the GDPR because it hadn't employed the necessary organizational and technical measures to that ensure no unauthorized access was allowed. ",prior     issue  employee access  health data   concern person   investigation  data protection authority discover   company  infringe upon cle        hadnt employ  necessary organizational  technical measure   ensure  unauthorized access  allow ,0,0,1,0
181,"The company sent marketing messages without the express consent of the receivers, and without offering a way for them to withdraw consent.", company send market message without  express consent   receivers  without offer  way    withdraw consent,1,1,0,0
182,"The East Power company failed to respond to three subpoenas related to a direct marketing complaint. Moreover, the data protection authority discovered that East Power had either obstructed the course of the investigation or, at the very least, did not fully cooperate with the supervisory authority in compliance with its obligations.", east power company fail  respond  three subpoena relate   direct market complaint moreover  data protection authority discover  east power  either obstruct  course   investigation     least   fully cooperate   supervisory authority  compliance   obligations,0,0,0,1
183,The company accessed personal data of a former employee on his work computer., company access personal data   former employee   work computer,1,1,0,0
184,"The company’s website, which is a license plate seller, demanded personal information in the form of first and last name, copy of ID card and driver’s license, as well as the car’s VIN number, yet did not offer an updated data processing policy in accordance with the GDPR, or an encrypted transport protocol.", company’ website    license plate seller demand personal information   form  first  last name copy  id card  driver’ license  well   car’ vin number yet   offer  update data process policy  accordance      encrypt transport protocol,0,0,1,0
185,"Borjamotor S.A. sent commercial advertisements to the data subject in question by means of e-mail and SMS, despite the data subject having revoked his/her consent to receive said advertisements, as well as a request to delete his/her personal data. Despite the company confirming this, the data subject kept receiving SMS and e-mail marketing materials.",borjamotor sa send commercial advertisements   data subject  question  mean  email  sms despite  data subject  revoke / consent  receive say advertisements  well   request  delete / personal data despite  company confirm   data subject keep receive sms  email market materials,0,0,0,1
186,"Vodafone Romania employed weak and insufficient security measures, which led to an event of erroneous data processing. When an individual issued a complaint, the company incorrectly processed the client’s data and sent it to a wrong e-mail address.",vodafone romania employ weak  insufficient security measure  lead   event  erroneous data process   individual issue  complaint  company incorrectly process  client’ data  send    wrong email address,1,0,1,0
187,"Google was fined with €7,000,000 by the Swedish Data Protection Authority due to failing to adequately comply with its obligations regarding the right of data subjects to have their search results removed from Google search. The Data Protection Authority of Sweden had already completed an investigation on Google in 2017 where it investigated how the company dealt with individuals' requests to be removed from search results. At that time, the Data Protection Authority instructed Google to be more pro-active in executing these removal requests. In 2018 the Authority initialed a further investigation after it was reported that Google did not remove search results related to individuals even after the earlier instructions in 2017 to do so. The Authority also questioned Google's practice of informing website owners about which search results Google had removed, specifically which link (search result) has been removed and who was behind the removal request.",google       swedish data protection authority due  fail  adequately comply   obligations regard  right  data subject    search result remove  google search  data protection authority  sweden  already complete  investigation  google    investigate   company deal  individuals request   remove  search result   time  data protection authority instruct google    proactive  execute  removal request   authority initial   investigation    report  google   remove search result relate  individuals even   earlier instructions      authority also question google practice  inform website owners   search result google  remove specifically  link search result   remove    behind  removal request,1,1,0,0
188,"Telekom Romania allowed the unlawful processing of personal data due to inefficient and inadequate security measures whose accuracy was limited. Telekom Romania had thus breached Art. 32 GDPR, and it was ordered by the GDPR to immediately employ more effective security mechanisms that would accurately identify and protect the personal data of clients from any unlawful and unauthorized disclosure and processing.",telekom romania allow  unlawful process  personal data due  inefficient  inadequate security measure whose accuracy  limit telekom romania  thus breach      order     immediately employ  effective security mechanisms  would accurately identify  protect  personal data  clients   unlawful  unauthorized disclosure  process,0,0,1,0
189,The political party requested a former party member to act as an election representative during the election process. This request was unlawful due to the insufficient legal basis regarding the data processing by that individual., political party request  former party member  act   election representative   election process  request  unlawful due   insufficient legal basis regard  data process   individual,1,1,0,0
190,"The data controller monitored public space using CCTV cameras, which was outside the scope of the surveillance system.", data controller monitor public space use cctv cameras   outside  scope   surveillance system,1,0,0,0
191,"The data controller, a telecommunication company, failed to employ proper organizational and security measures. This resulted in the exposure of various personal data to a customer who simply entered another customer’s name and date of birth. According to Art. 32 GDPR, the company employed an inadequate BfDI, which wasn’t enough to properly secure and protect the processing of personal data. However, the company was very cooperative with the data protection authority, so the fine was reduced from EUR 9,55 million to EUR 900,000. The culpability of the company was reasonably low to justify this decrease in the fine’s value, due to the fact that the company’s procedure of identifying customers through the hotline by asking only the name and date of birth wasn’t objected by any customer, so the company wasn’t aware of the problem this procedure posed. Moreover, the court of law deemed that this problem didn’t result in a massive data leakage.", data controller  telecommunication company fail  employ proper organizational  security measure  result   exposure  various personal data   customer  simply enter another customer’ name  date  birth accord     company employ  inadequate bfdi  ’ enough  properly secure  protect  process  personal data however  company   cooperative   data protection authority     reduce   million    culpability   company  reasonably low  justify  decrease   ’ value due   fact   company’ procedure  identify customers   hotline  ask   name  date  birth ’ object   customer   company ’ aware   problem  procedure pose moreover  court  law deem   problem ’ result   massive data leakage,0,0,1,0
192,The company unlawfully ported a data subject’s phone number without the subject’s consent (there was no signature on the porting contract)., company unlawfully port  data subject’ phone number without  subject’ consent    signature   port contract,1,1,0,0
193,"The Spanish DPA (AEPD) fined Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentgaria S.A. with EUR 5,000,000 for violating Art. 13 GDPR (EUR 2,000,000) and Art. 6 GDPR (EUR 3,000,000). The bank had not used the precise terminology in its Privacy Policy, and it did not implement the necessary procedures to ask for the consent of the customers regarding the data processing. It also failed to provide the necessary information regarding the type of data it would process. The company’s privacy statement is not sufficiently clear about the legal basis of the data processing.", spanish dpa aepd  banco bilbao vizcaya argentgaria sa    violate           bank   use  precise terminology   privacy policy     implement  necessary procedures  ask   consent   customers regard  data process  also fail  provide  necessary information regard  type  data  would process  company’ privacy statement   sufficiently clear   legal basis   data process,0,1,0,0
194,"The University failed to apply the appropriate organizational and technical measures to ensure proper data security. As part of a research project on male rape, information about police reports, containing names, ID numbers, contact details, health information, and details about the sex lives of data subjects, as well as information related to the suspected crime, were stored in the cloud of a U.S. service provider. The Swedish DPA notes that the cloud services don’t properly protect the sensitive data in a way fitting its significance. Moreover, one investigation report was sent to the Swedish police in an unencrypted form, and the responsible party did not document or report this incident to the DPA.", university fail  apply  appropriate organizational  technical measure  ensure proper data security  part   research project  male rape information  police report contain name id number contact detail health information  detail   sex live  data subject  well  information relate   suspect crime  store   cloud   us service provider  swedish dpa note   cloud service ’ properly protect  sensitive data   way fit  significance moreover one investigation report  send   swedish police   unencrypted form   responsible party   document  report  incident   dpa,1,0,1,0
195,"The homeowners association violated the principle of data minimization by employing illegal video surveillance of the public space. Moreover, the association also violated the principle of information obligation, as it did not provide sufficient information related to the video surveillance.", homeowners association violate  principle  data minimization  employ illegal video surveillance   public space moreover  association also violate  principle  information obligation     provide sufficient information relate   video surveillance,1,0,0,0
196,A patient’s personal data was unlawfully publicized., patient’ personal data  unlawfully publicize,1,1,0,0
197,"The company in question had flagrantly breached the principles of storage restriction and purpose limitation when it was found out to have a large amount of customer data in its databases that was not relevant any longer for any essential purpose of the company. Moreover, there was no data retention period established for this data. In addition to this, the data protection authority discovered that the company had not properly ensured the risk prevention in the data management as well as data security, inter alia, and arguing. The company did not employ any encryption protocols to secure this data.", company  question  flagrantly breach  principles  storage restriction  purpose limitation    find     large amount  customer data   databases    relevant  longer   essential purpose   company moreover    data retention period establish   data  addition    data protection authority discover   company   properly ensure  risk prevention   data management  well  data security inter alia  argue  company   employ  encryption protocols  secure  data,1,0,1,0
198,"The operator of CCTV cameras on a residential property overlooking the shared space of two blocks of flats received a fine of €5,000. Despite having the property owners give their consent to the surveillance by signing the notarized purchase contracts, the Data Protection Authority denied the owners’ consent and fined the data controller.", operator  cctv cameras   residential property overlook  share space  two block  flats receive     despite   property owners give  consent   surveillance  sign  notarize purchase contract  data protection authority deny  owners’ consent    data controller,0,1,0,0
199,"Vodafone Italia was fined EUR 12,251,601 for unlawful processing of personal data belonging to millions of customers, for telemarketing purposes. The legal proceedings were preceded by hundreds of complaints coming from data subjects about unsolicited phone calls, which made the data protection authority to start the investigations. During the investigation, several violations of the data protection law were discovered, such as a violation of the consent requirements and the violation of general data protection obligations (accountability, for instance). The data protection authority criticized the use of fake phone numbers by the Vodafone contracted call centers (in that the phone numbers had not been registered with the National Consolidated Registry of Communication Operators). Moreover, Vodafone was also found guilty of several violations regarding the handling of contact lists obtained from external providers. Lastly, the data protection authority considered the security measures used to manage the customer data to be inadequate and insufficient.",vodafone italia     unlawful process  personal data belong  millions  customers  telemarketing purpose  legal proceed  precede  hundreds  complaints come  data subject  unsolicited phone call  make  data protection authority  start  investigations   investigation several    data protection law  discover       consent requirements     general data protection obligations accountability  instance  data protection authority criticize  use  fake phone number   vodafone contract call center    phone number    register   national consolidate registry  communication operators moreover vodafone  also find guilty  several  regard  handle  contact list obtain  external providers lastly  data protection authority consider  security measure use  manage  customer data   inadequate  insufficient,1,1,1,0
200,"No data processing agreement has been concluded with the company whose servers contained the resources of the Public Information Bulletin (BIP) of the Municipal Office in Aleksandrów Kujawski. For this reason, a fine of 40.000 PLN (9400 EUR) was imposed on the mayor of the city.", data process agreement   conclude   company whose servers contain  resources   public information bulletin bip   municipal office  aleksandrów kujawski   reason    pln   impose   mayor   city,0,0,0,1
201,"A controller was sanctioned because he had unlawfully processed the personal data (CNP), and images of employees obtained through the surveillance system. The disclosure of the CNP in a report for the ISCIR training in 2018 wasn’t legal, as per Art.6 GDPR.", controller  sanction    unlawfully process  personal data cnp  image  employees obtain   surveillance system  disclosure   cnp   report   iscir train  ’ legal  per  ,1,1,0,0
202,The company had unlawfully processed the personal data despite the subject’s request to stop doing so., company  unlawfully process  personal data despite  subject’ request  stop  ,1,1,0,0
203,Iberdrola Clientes violated Article 13 of the GDPR when it showed a complete lack of cooperation with the AEPD. The latter had requested Iberdrola Clientes to provide the necessary information needed to add a person to the solvency list.,iberdrola clientes violate cle      show  complete lack  cooperation   aepd  latter  request iberdrola clientes  provide  necessary information need  add  person   solvency list,0,0,0,1
204,"An operator utilized an unfilled checkbox through which users could request that they do not receive any emails from the company. Since they couldn’t do that, they continued receiving information via email.", operator utilize  unfilled checkbox   users could request     receive  email   company since  ’    continue receive information via email,1,1,0,0
205,"The Company had retained the personal data of customers who had expressed their desire to discontinue receiving emails from the company. Eight customers complained to have received such emails, despite not having solicited them. Moreover, the company refused to share information with five subjects regarding their rights to withdraw consent in the processing of personal information.", company  retain  personal data  customers   express  desire  discontinue receive email   company eight customers complain   receive  email despite   solicit  moreover  company refuse  share information  five subject regard  right  withdraw consent   process  personal information,0,0,0,1
206,"A merchant was found guilty of trying to create a customer card using an electronic identity card. In doing so, the merchant would have needed access to personal information on the electronic identity card, including photo and barcode. The fine was 10.000 euros.", merchant  find guilty  try  create  customer card use  electronic identity card     merchant would  need access  personal information   electronic identity card include photo  barcode    euros,1,0,0,0
207,The company was fined because it had refused to comply with the obligation of appointing a data protection officer., company      refuse  comply   obligation  appoint  data protection officer,0,0,0,1
208,"Because of the inappropriate handling of personal data, more than 6 million individuals had their data hacked. This informational leak was a direct cause of the company's security laxity. ",   inappropriate handle  personal data   million individuals   data hack  informational leak   direct cause   company security laxity ,0,0,1,0
209,"Data leakage due to the inappropriate security and organizational measures of the company. Information related to more than 23.000 credits records belonging to more than 33.000 customers were made public. The data included names, ID numbers, biometric data, addresses, and copies of identity cards.",data leakage due   inappropriate security  organizational measure   company information relate    credit record belong    customers  make public  data include name id number biometric data address  copy  identity card,0,0,1,0
210,"The merchant had ignored a client’s demands to stop processing personal data, in particular, the phone number. The merchant had continued sending the subject advertising messages to the subject's phone number.", merchant  ignore  client’ demand  stop process personal data  particular  phone number  merchant  continue send  subject advertise message   subject phone number,0,0,0,1
211,"A school attempted to introduce the use of facial recognition software to facilitate the attendance process of students. The school was ultimately fined because the means used to monitor attendance were disproportionate to the goal itself. Moreover, students and their parents couldn’t freely withdraw consent from being monitored to validate attendance. Furthermore, one case of processing activity presented elevated risks since it involved children dependent on the high-school board. Ultimately, the school didn’t observe Art. 35 of the GDPR.", school attempt  introduce  use  facial recognition software  facilitate  attendance process  students  school  ultimately    mean use  monitor attendance  disproportionate   goal  moreover students   parent ’ freely withdraw consent   monitor  validate attendance furthermore one case  process activity present elevate risk since  involve children dependent   highschool board ultimately  school ’ observe    ,1,0,0,0
212,"A client had complained that AVOND COSMETICS hadn’t observed the law when it processed his personal data erroneously. His identity wasn’t properly verified, which led to the erroneous matching of that client with a register of claims. As a result, the client wasn’t able to work with his bank. Moreover, a third-party utilized the client’s personal data unlawfully.", client  complain  avond cosmetics ’ observe  law   process  personal data erroneously  identity ’ properly verify  lead   erroneous match   client   register  claim   result  client ’ able  work   bank moreover  thirdparty utilize  client’ personal data unlawfully,0,1,0,0
213,A soccer coach was fined for having covertly filmed female players while they were taking showers. This had taken place for many years., soccer coach     covertly film female players    take shower   take place  many years,0,1,0,0
214,"The company unlawfully processed the employer's data while creating the illusion that it acted under the legal basis of consent. Whereas, the company was using a different legal basis. This is a strict violation of the transparency principle. Moreover, the company violated the accountability principle when it failed to bring evidence related to the proper assessment of the employer's data using the right legal bases. ", company unlawfully process  employers data  create  illusion   act   legal basis  consent whereas  company  use  different legal basis    strict    transparency principle moreover  company violate  accountability principle   fail  bring evidence relate   proper assessment   employers data use  right legal base ,1,1,0,0
215,"The company had allowed for personal data belonging to clients (including copies of the driver’s license) to be publicized online. Apparently, unauthorized access was detected, and the fault lies with the inappropriate security measures.", company  allow  personal data belong  clients include copy   driver’ license   publicize online apparently unauthorized access  detect   fault lie   inappropriate security measure,0,0,1,0
216,"In a cyber incident previously notified to the ICO on November 18, Marriott International unintentionally exposed the personal data of over 330 million guest records globally, out of which 30 million were residents of 31 countries in the European Economic Area. About seven million were residents of the UK. This cyber vulnerability is related to the data breach of the Starwood hotels group in 2014. Marriott bought Starwood in 2016, yet the data breach was only identified in 2018, when Marriott notified the ICO about it. During the investigation, the ICO found that Marriott had employed inadequate security check-ups on its systems after acquiring Starwood. Recently, the ICO decided to fine Marriott with £18.4 million (about EUR 20.4 million). When calculating this fine, the ICO took into consideration the company’s absence of prior violations of GDPR regulations, as well as the company’s full cooperation during the investigation, and personal initiative to notify the affected individuals regarding the data breach.",  cyber incident previously notify   ico  november marriott international unintentionally expose  personal data   million guest record globally    million  residents  countries   european economic area  seven million  residents   uk  cyber vulnerability  relate   data breach   starwood hotels group  marriott buy starwood  yet  data breach   identify   marriott notify  ico     investigation  ico find  marriott  employ inadequate security checkups   systems  acquire starwood recently  ico decide   marriott  £ million   million  calculate    ico take  consideration  company’ absence  prior    regulations  well   company’ full cooperation   investigation  personal initiative  notify  affect individuals regard  data breach,0,0,1,0
217,"Back in July 2019, the ICO notified the British Airways that it would impose a fine of £183,39M for having infringed on several GDPR regulations, including a breach of Art. 32 GDPR. This fine was related to an incident notified in September 2018 by British Airways, involving the user traffic on the official website of the British Airways being diverted to a fraudulent website. This fraudulent website would harvest the customer details of all clients taken there. The personal data of more than 500,000 customers was harvested during the incident. During the ICO’s investigation, it was found that British Airways was mainly to blame for much of the compromised information, due to inadequate security measures, such as log-in, payment card, and travel booking details. The ICO eventually decided to lower the fine to £20 million (about EUR 22,046,000), taking into consideration the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the airline industry.",back  july  ico notify  british airways   would impose    £   infringe  several  regulations include  breach       relate   incident notify  september  british airways involve  user traffic   official website   british airways  divert   fraudulent website  fraudulent website would harvest  customer detail   clients take   personal data    customers  harvest   incident   ico’ investigation   find  british airways  mainly  blame  much   compromise information due  inadequate security measure   login payment card  travel book detail  ico eventually decide  lower    £ million   take  consideration  economic impact   covid pandemic   airline industry,1,0,1,0
218,"The Company was issued a fine because it had failed to provide the necessary security and organization measures in two cases. Firstly, it failed in the appropriate determination of the data processing means. Secondly, it failed in the appropriate implementation of necessary security safeguards, which led to the public disclosure of the personal data of over 337.042 people.", company  issue      fail  provide  necessary security  organization measure  two case firstly  fail   appropriate determination   data process mean secondly  fail   appropriate implementation  necessary security safeguard  lead   public disclosure   personal data   people,1,0,0,0
219,"The data controllers didn’t exert sufficient rigorousness when handling personal client data, which led to the displacement of a flash memory stick with personal data.", data controllers ’ exert sufficient rigorousness  handle personal client data  lead   displacement   flash memory stick  personal data,0,0,0,1
220,"After a serious investigation, the DDPA surmised that the Hague Hospital failed to provide the appropriate security measures for possession of patient records. This investigation had started following several events when multiple staff hospital members had checked the personal data of a Dutch person. Measures were taken, and the hospital was warned – it would have to update its security measures by the 2nd of October 2019 or it would incur e penalty of 100.000 EUR every two weeks.",  serious investigation  ddpa surmise   hague hospital fail  provide  appropriate security measure  possession  patient record  investigation  start follow several events  multiple staff hospital members  check  personal data   dutch person measure  take   hospital  warn –  would   update  security measure   nd  october   would incur e penalty   every two weeks,0,0,1,0
221,"Complaints from the employees were received that they were unlawfully filmed in the workspace.  The company failed to observe the rules pertaining to the unlawful filming of employees all the time, and the necessity of providing information related to the data processing to the employees. The CNIL performed an audit in October 2018, and the company wasn’t observing the data protection laws. Therefore, fines were issued.",complaints   employees  receive    unlawfully film   workspace  company fail  observe  rule pertain   unlawful film  employees   time   necessity  provide information relate   data process   employees  cnil perform  audit  october   company ’ observe  data protection laws therefore   issue,1,0,1,0
222,A mayor was fined for having misused people’s personal data during a political campaign., mayor     misuse people’ personal data   political campaign,1,1,0,0
223,"The company was fined because of two reasons – the complete lack of security measures, and excessive data storage. Regarding the former reason, personal data, including health cards, IDs, divorce judgments, and account statements were available online with no authentication procedure. Moreover, the company breached the data storage deadline it had in place and kept clients' data for more than it should have.", company     two reason –  complete lack  security measure  excessive data storage regard  former reason personal data include health card ids divorce judgments  account statements  available online   authentication procedure moreover  company breach  data storage deadline    place  keep clients data      ,0,0,1,0
224,"The subjects had not been informed about the data processing, and the data controllers had not complied with the principle of purpose limitation.", subject    inform   data process   data controllers   comply   principle  purpose limitation,1,1,0,0
225,"The data controllers had overextended his authority to collect unwarranted information about the clients. Moreover, a data breach took place from 09-10 July 2018, when payment data was made available on the internet. Moreover, the data controllers had not reported the data breach.", data controllers  overextend  authority  collect unwarranted information   clients moreover  data breach take place  july  payment data  make available   internet moreover  data controllers   report  data breach,1,0,1,0
226,"The fine was issued on the following grounds: insufficient security measures established on the app launched by an Oslo school. This app allowed students and parents to contact teachers in real-time. However, unauthorized access was detected, and unknown people gained access to personal data related to students and school employees. ",   issue   follow grounds: insufficient security measure establish   app launch   oslo school  app allow students  parent  contact teachers  realtime however unauthorized access  detect  unknown people gain access  personal data relate  students  school employees ,0,0,1,0
227,"The sports association published personal data related to judges who had received judicial licenses online. Moreover, the exact addresses and PESEL numbers of these judges became public. As the sports association acted outside the law, fines were in order. However, there were mitigating circumstances in that the sports association immediately noticed its mistakes and attempted to remove the data from the public domain. Still, these attempts were ineffective, and a penalty was issued. The 585 judges had suffered no damage because of this, so the penalty was adjusted by the president of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection.", sport association publish personal data relate  judge   receive judicial license online moreover  exact address  pesel number   judge become public   sport association act outside  law    order however   mitigate circumstances    sport association immediately notice  mistake  attempt  remove  data   public domain still  attempt  ineffective   penalty  issue  judge  suffer  damage      penalty  adjust   president   office  competition  consumer protection,0,1,0,0
228,"Website affiliated with the Movimento 5 Stelle, an Italian political party, had a data breach in 2017. Rousseau, the data processor running these websites, had insufficient security measures in place. Garante, the Italian Data Protection Authority, issued a request to update these measures and the privacy information notice, for more transparency on the processing of data. The information issue was completed on time. However, Rousseau failed to adopt new security measures, and it was fined by Garante.",website affiliate   movimento stelle  italian political party   data breach  rousseau  data processor run  websites  insufficient security measure  place garante  italian data protection authority issue  request  update  measure   privacy information notice   transparency   process  data  information issue  complete  time however rousseau fail  adopt new security measure      garante,0,0,1,0
229,"The data controller had no legal basis to process data in conformity with art 6.1.b, related to the claims.", data controller   legal basis  process data  conformity  art b relate   claim,1,1,0,0
230,"The municipality had employed insufficient security measures in protecting its computer systems. As a result, personal data related to more than 35.000 individuals became publicly accessible. In the case of a few schools, anyone could access information related to the staff, the pupils, and the employees of the school. Moreover, the municipality has received warnings about the weakness of its security measures before but chose not to do anything.", municipality  employ insufficient security measure  protect  computer systems   result personal data relate    individuals become publicly accessible   case    school anyone could access information relate   staff  pupils   employees   school moreover  municipality  receive warn   weakness   security measure   choose    anything,1,0,1,0
231,"The private company was fined for having breached the information obligation in the case of personal data of several entrepreneurs. The data was taken from public sources (Central Electronic Register and Information on Economic Activity) and used for commercial purposes. In accordance with Art. 14(1) – (3) of the GDPR, the company was obligated to inform all the individuals concerned about the data processing. However, the company informed only those individuals for whom it had email addresses. For the rest, the high operational costs made them ignore the information obligation.", private company     breach  information obligation   case  personal data  several entrepreneurs  data  take  public source central electronic register  information  economic activity  use  commercial purpose  accordance   –     company  obligate  inform   individuals concern   data process however  company inform   individuals     email address   rest  high operational cost make  ignore  information obligation,0,0,0,1
232,"The personal data administrator unlawfully processed personal data of subject D.D related to an Employment Contract, while the subject was imprisoned.", personal data administrator unlawfully process personal data  subject dd relate   employment contract   subject  imprison,1,1,0,0
233,Not available, available,0,0,0,1
234,The data processing had breached the storage limitation and data minimization principles of the GDPR., data process  breach  storage limitation  data minimization principles   ,1,0,0,0
235,"The data processing was conducted in a way that didn't ensure the appropriate security of the data itself. Meaning that anyone could access or alter it in an irreversible way (deletion, destruction).", data process  conduct   way  didnt ensure  appropriate security   data  mean  anyone could access  alter    irreversible way deletion destruction,0,0,1,0
236,"The fine was issued after the Mayor’s Office unlawfully disclosed personal information related to a whistleblower. The individual complained to the NAIH about his employer. Afterward, the company requested information about the complaint, and the Mayor’s Office “accidentally” released the name of the complainant. The individual was fired as a result.",   issue   mayor’ office unlawfully disclose personal information relate   whistleblower  individual complain   naih   employer afterward  company request information   complaint   mayor’ office “accidentally” release  name   complainant  individual  fire   result,1,1,0,0
237,"The complainant was unlawfully and unknowingly been registered for the prepaid services of a telecommunication service provider. The employees had used personal data illegally and without express consent from the subject. Moreover, the signature on the application was found to be incongruent and dissimilar to the subject’s own signature. The identity card number on the prepaid application was also fake.", complainant  unlawfully  unknowingly  register   prepay service   telecommunication service provider  employees  use personal data illegally  without express consent   subject moreover  signature   application  find   incongruent  dissimilar   subject’  signature  identity card number   prepay application  also fake,1,1,0,0
238,An employee requested access to his personal data from his employer. The request was partially completed and delayed without justification., employee request access   personal data   employer  request  partially complete  delay without justification,0,0,0,1
239,"A data subject requested the erasure of the data processed by a debt collector who requested further personal information to identify the subject. After being provided with said information (place of birth, mother’s maiden name, etc), the debt collector stated that he could not comply with the request. The debt collector invoked the Accountancy Act and other internal policies for why he was obliged to retain backup data copies. The NAIH issued a fine because the data controller had not informed the subject about these policies.", data subject request  erasure   data process   debt collector  request  personal information  identify  subject   provide  say information place  birth mother’ maiden name etc  debt collector state   could  comply   request  debt collector invoke  accountancy act   internal policies     oblige  retain backup data copy  naih issue     data controller   inform  subject   policies,1,0,0,0
240,The Lands Authority had a data breach where 10 GB worth of personal data was publicly accessible on the internet. The data contained sensitive information about data subjects. The Data Protection Commissioner might issue a fine of 25.000 Euros for each of the violations (data breaches)., land authority   data breach  gb worth  personal data  publicly accessible   internet  data contain sensitive information  data subject  data protection commissioner might issue    euros      data breach,1,0,1,0
241,"The French NGO “La Quadrature du Net” and the Austrian organization “None Of Your Business” complained about the creation of a Google account related to the configuration of the Android system in a mobile phone. A fine of 50 million euros was issued because the following principles were not observed: the principle of transparency (Art. 5 GDPR), the sufficiency of information (Art.13 / 14 GDPR), and the presence of legal basis (Art. 6 GDPR).", french ngo “la quadrature du net”   austrian organization “none   business” complain   creation   google account relate   configuration   android system   mobile phone    million euros  issue   follow principles   observed:  principle  transparency    sufficiency  information  /    presence  legal basis   ,1,1,0,0
242,The bank unlawfully came into possession of personal data related to a student., bank unlawfully come  possession  personal data relate   student,1,1,0,0
243,"A person was fined for having unlawfully filmed public areas using a private CCTV system. The system filmed parking lots, sidewalks, a garden area of a nearby property, and it also filmed the neighbors going in and out of their homes. The video surveillance was found to be unreasonable given the initial purpose of the CCTV system itself. Because it filmed private areas of life without the express consent of the people involved, the subject was fined.", person     unlawfully film public areas use  private cctv system  system film park lot sidewalks  garden area   nearby property   also film  neighbor go      home  video surveillance  find   unreasonable give  initial purpose   cctv system    film private areas  life without  express consent   people involve  subject  ,1,1,0,0
244,The data subject was not given access to CCTV recordings and was not informed that he could complain to the supervisory authority about the data controller’s refusal to retain the recordings., data subject   give access  cctv record    inform   could complain   supervisory authority   data controller’ refusal  retain  record,0,0,0,1
245,"This fine was apparently withdrawn. The case concerned the Kolibri Image who lodged a complaint that a service provider did not want to sign a processing agreement. Afterward, the Kolibri Image was fined because it didn’t have any processing agreement with the service provider. However, the company argued that the service provider was not a processor, and therefore the fine was unreasonable and unwarranted.",   apparently withdraw  case concern  kolibri image  lodge  complaint   service provider   want  sign  process agreement afterward  kolibri image     ’   process agreement   service provider however  company argue   service provider    processor  therefore    unreasonable  unwarranted,0,0,0,1
246,"A hack revealed the personal data that included email addresses and passwords of around 330,000 users.", hack reveal  personal data  include email address  passwords  around users,0,0,1,0
247,The car owner used the dash-cam unlawfully., car owner use  dashcam unlawfully,1,1,0,0
248,The hospital was found to create fake doctor profiles for the personnel to unlawfully access patient data. The management system found 985 registered doctors when the hospital only had 296 doctors., hospital  find  create fake doctor profile   personnel  unlawfully access patient data  management system find register doctor   hospital   doctor,1,0,1,0
249,"The Austrian Post had sold detailed personal profiles of approximately three million Austrians to various companies and political parties. The profiles contained names, addresses, political predilections, and even intimate details.", austrian post  sell detail personal profile  approximately three million austrians  various company  political party  profile contain name address political predilections  even intimate detail,1,1,0,0
250,Two companies working in finances didn’t follow the procedure when disposing of personal data.,two company work  finance ’ follow  procedure  dispose  personal data,0,0,1,0
251,"Because of insufficient data security mechanisms, a digital publication accidentally disclosed personal health data related to several subjects.",  insufficient data security mechanisms  digital publication accidentally disclose personal health data relate  several subject,0,0,1,0
252,"The company collected data from multiple tenants without providing the option to remove that data once it was no longer required. This led to the company retaining personal data of tenants for years (salary statements, social security insurances, health insurances, tax insurances, bank statements). The Berlin Data Commissioner issued a fine of €14,500,000.", company collect data  multiple tenant without provide  option  remove  data     longer require  lead   company retain personal data  tenant  years salary statements social security insurances health insurances tax insurances bank statements  berlin data commissioner issue    ,1,0,0,0
253,"Vodafone Espana called the complainant to offer its services but the data subject refused. His personal data had been acquired by the company through his daughter. Despite his refusal, Vodafone Espana provided the services and demanded payment for them. Therefore, the company had unlawfully processed the complainant’s personal data without express consent.",vodafone espana call  complainant  offer  service   data subject refuse  personal data   acquire   company   daughter despite  refusal vodafone espana provide  service  demand payment   therefore  company  unlawfully process  complainant’ personal data without express consent,1,1,0,0
254,"The Company failed to observe Art.14 of the GDPR, which states that the data controller must inform the data subject of the processing of personal data. The DPA has stated that Bisnode has three months to notify a total of 6 million people of this.", company fail  observe      state   data controller must inform  data subject   process  personal data  dpa  state  bisnode  three months  notify  total  million people  ,0,0,0,1
255,"The Company sent marketing messages to over 2.5 million customers without their consent. The marketing message encouraged data subjects the ""My EE"" app to manage their accounts. Furthermore, the Company sent another batch of marketing messages to other customers afterward.", company send market message   million customers without  consent  market message encourage data subject   ee app  manage  account furthermore  company send another batch  market message   customers afterward,0,0,0,1
256,The data controller company lacked a data processing agreement with the Spanish service provider., data controller company lack  data process agreement   spanish service provider,0,0,0,1
257,"Vodafone mistakenly charged a customer whose information it disclosed to BADEXCUG, a solvency registry. SETSTI, the Spanish telecommunications and information agency demanded that Vodafone reimburse the client. The AEPD decided that Vodafone had acted erroneously and that it had breached the principle of accuracy. ",vodafone mistakenly charge  customer whose information  disclose  badexcug  solvency registry setsti  spanish telecommunications  information agency demand  vodafone reimburse  client  aepd decide  vodafone  act erroneously     breach  principle  accuracy ,1,0,0,0
258,"An online credit agency transferred an undue credit claim to a debt collecting agency, providing the agency with the subject’s email address. However, the debt collecting agency sent emails to the company where the subject worked. This institutional email was accessible by all employees of that company. The online credit agency had not provided these emails.", online credit agency transfer  undue credit claim   debt collect agency provide  agency   subject’ email address however  debt collect agency send email   company   subject work  institutional email  accessible   employees   company  online credit agency   provide  email,1,0,0,0
259,"The data subject had demanded that his data be deleted from the Vodafone records in 2015, which the company agreed to and confirmed. However, he received more than 200 SMS messages in 2018, which Vodafone admitted it was a technical error on their part. They had performed tests, and the data subject’s phone number mistakenly appeared in various customer files. The fine was set at 27.000 Euros since Vodafone admitted to its mistake.", data subject  demand   data  delete   vodafone record    company agree   confirm however  receive   sms message   vodafone admit    technical error   part   perform test   data subject’ phone number mistakenly appear  various customer file    set  euros since vodafone admit   mistake,1,0,0,0
260,"ENDESA erroneously charged the claimant’s bank account, as the beneficiary of the energy supply company’s services was a third party. Upon request of the claimant that her data be deleted, ENDESA handled the data improperly and mistakenly sent it to the third party. Therefore, the AEPD considered that ENDESA had breached the confidentiality principle. It’s worth noting that the third party had been given a 2-year restraining order regarding the data subject.",endesa erroneously charge  claimant’ bank account   beneficiary   energy supply company’ service   third party upon request   claimant   data  delete endesa handle  data improperly  mistakenly send    third party therefore  aepd consider  endesa  breach  confidentiality principle ’ worth note   third party   give  year restrain order regard  data subject,1,0,0,0
261,"The restaurant wanted to sanction an employee using images taken by another employee in the restaurant, to be used as evidence.", restaurant want  sanction  employee use image take  another employee   restaurant   use  evidence,1,1,0,0
262,The data controller did not comply with the data subject’s request to access personal data related to audio recordings., data controller   comply   data subject’ request  access personal data relate  audio record,0,0,0,1
263,"Personal data in the form of documents were thrown to the garbage dump, which is an improper method of disposing of such documents.",personal data   form  document  throw   garbage dump    improper method  dispose   document,1,0,1,0
264,Improper information security measures in place.,improper information security measure  place,1,0,1,0
265,"The Data Protection Authority found that the City had published personal data on the official city website in violation of the law, and without asking for the consent of the data subjects. The City had claimed that it was doing this attempting to fulfill the Freedom of Information Act’s premises.", data protection authority find   city  publish personal data   official city website     law  without ask   consent   data subject  city  claim      attempt  fulfill  freedom  information act’ premise,1,1,0,0
266,Illegal disclosure of personal data.,illegal disclosure  personal data,0,1,0,0
267,A data breach was not notified in time and the affected subjects were not made aware., data breach   notify  time   affect subject   make aware,0,0,0,1
268,"In a digital publication, health data was accidentally published due to inadequate internal control mechanisms.Due to inadequate internal control mechanisms, health data was made public by a digital publication.",  digital publication health data  accidentally publish due  inadequate internal control mechanismsdue  inadequate internal control mechanisms health data  make public   digital publication,0,0,1,0
269,"The Dutch employee insurance service provider – ""Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen – UWV did not use multi-factor authentication for accessing the employer web portal. Health and safety services, as well as employers, were able to view and collect data from employees, data to which normally they should not have had access to.", dutch employee insurance service provider uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen uwv   use multifactor authentication  access  employer web portal health  safety service  well  employers  able  view  collect data  employees data   normally      access ,0,0,1,0
270,"The Company did not have the appropriate organizational measures in place that would allow data subjects to withdraw their consent to the processing of personal data. Moreover, the data subjects also couldn’t easily request the deletion of their personal data.", company     appropriate organizational measure  place  would allow data subject  withdraw  consent   process  personal data moreover  data subject also ’ easily request  deletion   personal data,1,0,0,0
271,The gas company did not have the necessary technical measures in place to verify the identity of the subjects' data. It was alleged by a third party that the company emailed their information to a third party in regards to a request., gas company     necessary technical measure  place  verify  identity   subject data   allege   third party   company email  information   third party  regard   request,0,0,1,0
272,"Postal advertisements and commercial offers were sent by Jocker Premium Invex to a registrant to a local census, even though the registrant did not consent to receive such advertisements and offers.",postal advertisements  commercial offer  send  jocker premium invex   registrant   local census even though  registrant   consent  receive  advertisements  offer,0,1,0,0
273,"The General Confederation of Labour emailed personal data of a complainant with the aim of organizing a meeting. This included the name, home address, relationship status, pregnancy status and the date of an ongoing harassment case. The email was sent to around 400 members of the organization with the affected individual's consent.", general confederation  labour email personal data   complainant   aim  organize  meet  include  name home address relationship status pregnancy status   date   ongoing harassment case  email  send  around members   organization   affect individuals consent,0,1,0,0
274,A person was charged by the phone operator Telefónica for a telephone service that they never requested and owned. This happened because the bank account of the affected person was linked to the Telefónica profile of another person and as such the fees for the service were deduced from the affected person's account. The AEDP ruled that this was against the principles described by article 5 of GDPR., person  charge   phone operator telefónica   telephone service   never request    happen   bank account   affect person  link   telefónica profile  another person     fee   service  deduce   affect persons account  aedp rule      principles describe  article  ,1,0,0,0
275,Corporacion de Radio y Television Espanola lost 6 USB sticks with unencrypted personal information and data.,corporacion de radio  television espanola lose usb stick  unencrypted personal information  data,0,0,1,0
276,A third party had access to and modified the personal data of a customer that was included in a contract. The third party had no legal basis to access the data., third party  access   modify  personal data   customer   include   contract  third party   legal basis  access  data,0,1,0,0
277,BNP Paribas Personal Finance was requested to erase personal data of a client and it did not do so during the timeframe required by GDPR legislation.,bnp paribas personal finance  request  erase personal data   client         timeframe require   legislation,0,0,0,1
278,"Fan Courier Express SRL, which is a national courier service, was given an €11,000 fine because it failed to take appropriate technical and organizational measures to prevent the loss of personal data (name, bank card number, CVV code, cardholder's address, personal identification number, serial and identity card number, bank account number, authorized credit limit) of over 1100 private individuals.",fan courier express srl    national courier service  give      fail  take appropriate technical  organizational measure  prevent  loss  personal data name bank card number cvv code cardholders address personal identification number serial  identity card number bank account number authorize credit limit   private individuals,0,0,1,0
279,"Futura Internationale was fined because after several individuals have complained that they were cold-called by the company even after they have expressly requested not to be called again. The reason why the fine was so high relative to similar cases and fines was that the CNIL determined that the company had received a large number of letters requesting to be taken off from the call lists but decided to ignore them. More so, Futura Internationale was found to store excessive information about customers and their health data. The company did also not inform their customers about the processing of their personal data and that all telephone conversations were recorded.",futura internationale     several individuals  complain    coldcalled   company even    expressly request    call   reason      high relative  similar case      cnil determine   company  receive  large number  letter request   take    call list  decide  ignore    futura internationale  find  store excessive information  customers   health data  company  also  inform  customers   process   personal data    telephone conversations  record,1,1,0,0
280,UniCredit Bank opened a bank account for a person who has not requested any account to be opened. The bank allegedly had his personal data at their disposal because the affected person was responsible for closing a bank account operated by his employer. The bank was requested to prove that it had consent from the data subject to process his personal data but was unable to provide this proof.,unicredit bank open  bank account   person    request  account   open  bank allegedly   personal data   disposal   affect person  responsible  close  bank account operate   employer  bank  request  prove    consent   data subject  process  personal data   unable  provide  proof,0,1,0,0
281,The company acquired a photocopy of a person's ID card with the person's consent but continued to use and process the personal data even after the affected person had withdrawn their consent., company acquire  photocopy   persons id card   persons consent  continue  use  process  personal data even   affect person  withdraw  consent,0,1,0,0
282,"An online game operator was exposed to a DDoS attack that led to the malfunctioning of the game serves. The attackers blackmailed the operator into paying money for the attacks to stop. As part of the ""deal"", the attackers offered the operator to create and implement a better firewall protection system that would prevent any future attacks from other parties. The operator agreed to this ""deal"". The game operator then implemented the new code which indeed proved to be better than the old one used but – let's be honest, unsurprisingly – also included a backdoor that allowed the attacker to steal all the data that was on the server which included player details and personal information. The attacker uploaded this information on their website after that. ", online game operator  expose   ddos attack  lead   malfunction   game serve  attackers blackmail  operator  pay money   attack  stop  part   deal  attackers offer  operator  create  implement  better firewall protection system  would prevent  future attack   party  operator agree   deal  game operator  implement  new code  indeed prove   better   old one use  let  honest unsurprisingly also include  backdoor  allow  attacker  steal   data     server  include player detail  personal information  attacker upload  information   website   ,0,0,1,0
283,No further information is available.,  information  available,0,0,0,1
284,A private individual received an SMS from Xfera Móviles which was actually addressed to a different person and which included personal details of that third party person. The information included personal details as well as login details to the Xfera Móviles website for the third party person., private individual receive  sms  xfera móviles   actually address   different person   include personal detail   third party person  information include personal detail  well  login detail   xfera móviles website   third party person,0,0,1,0
285,The data controller did not take the necessary technical measures to prevent a data breach. No further details have been disclosed., data controller   take  necessary technical measure  prevent  data breach   detail   disclose,0,0,1,0
286,"Applications that were received from Slovak citizens requesting social benefits were sent to foreign authorities by post. These were lost, which resulted in all the personal details of the affected people to become public, including their physical addresses.",applications   receive  slovak citizens request social benefit  send  foreign authorities  post   lose  result    personal detail   affect people  become public include  physical address,0,0,1,0
287,"A fine of €20,000 was issued to the Romanian national airline Tarom because it failed to implement the necessary technical measures to ensure the security of personal information. As a consequence of these inadequate measures, a Tarom employee was able to access the flight booking application without authorization and see the personal data of 22 passengers, after which the employee took a photo of the list and made it public online. ",     issue   romanian national airline tarom   fail  implement  necessary technical measure  ensure  security  personal information   consequence   inadequate measure  tarom employee  able  access  flight book application without authorization  see  personal data  passengers    employee take  photo   list  make  public online ,0,0,1,0
288,"The Romanian branch of ING Bank N.V. Amsterdam was fined with €80,000 due to not respecting data protection principles (privacy by design și privacy by default) by not implementing adequate technical measures to ensure the protection of personal data. As a consequence of this, a total of 225,525 had their transactions doubled on debit card payments during the period of 8-10 October 2018.This is one of the bigger fines in Romania, but it's interesting to note that for similar offenses in other countries fines of over several millions of Euros are usually awarded. This denotes again the fact that different countries have different approaches to GDPR enforcement.", romanian branch  ing bank nv amsterdam     due   respect data protection principles privacy  design și privacy  default   implement adequate technical measure  ensure  protection  personal data   consequence    total    transactions double  debit card payments   period  october   one   bigger   romania   interest  note   similar offenses   countries    several millions  euros  usually award  denote   fact  different countries  different approach   enforcement,0,0,0,1
289,"The pension Royal President near Bucharest was fined €2,500 after it refused to process a request for the exercise of the right of access. The Romanian Data Processing Authority also determined that customers' personal data was not processed in accordance with GDPR principles.", pension royal president near bucharest      refuse  process  request   exercise   right  access  romanian data process authority also determine  customers personal data   process  accordance   principles,0,0,0,1
290,"Two Belgian politicians, a city councilor and a mayor have been fined €5,000 each for sending out campaign emails to recipients who have not consented to receive such emails.",two belgian politicians  city councilor   mayor       send  campaign email  recipients    consent  receive  email,0,1,0,0
291,"Two Belgian politicians, a city councilor and a mayor have been fined €5,000 each for sending out campaign emails to recipients who have not consented to receive such emails.",two belgian politicians  city councilor   mayor       send  campaign email  recipients    consent  receive  email,0,1,0,0
292,A private individual complained to the Data Protection Commission of Bulgaria (KZLD) that a debt collection agency has information about her accounts and status of those accounts with the purpose of collecting tax owned by the complainant. The KZLD concluded that the agency had no legal basis to obtain and process the data., private individual complain   data protection commission  bulgaria kzld   debt collection agency  information   account  status   account   purpose  collect tax    complainant  kzld conclude   agency   legal basis  obtain  process  data,0,1,0,0
293,"A private individual complained that the company had used their personal data that included their first and last name, address and VAT number in order to open an electricity supply contract. The individual was a former customer of the company, and as such the company was not allowed anymore to reuse the former customer's data without their permission.", private individual complain   company  use  personal data  include  first  last name address  vat number  order  open  electricity supply contract  individual   former customer   company     company   allow anymore  reuse  former customers data without  permission,0,1,0,0
294,"Vodafone had processed personal data of the claimant (bank details, name, surname and national identification number) years after the contractual relationsid had ended. The fine of EUR 35.000 was reduced to EUR 21.000.Vodafone processed the personal details of a former client, details that included first name, last name and national ID number, several years after their contractual relationship had ended. The initial fine was set at €35,000 but it was reduced to €21,000 due to cooperation on behalf of Vodafone Espana.",vodafone  process personal data   claimant bank detail name surname  national identification number years   contractual relationsid  end      reduce   vodafone process  personal detail   former client detail  include first name last name  national id number several years   contractual relationship  end  initial   set      reduce   due  cooperation  behalf  vodafone espana,0,1,0,0
295,"A technical error allowed customers to view the personal data of other customers on the company's website's customer area. The original fine of €60,000 was reduced to €48,000.", technical error allow customers  view  personal data   customers   company websites customer area  original     reduce  ,0,0,1,0
296,"The personal data of a customer was disclosed to a different customer through SMS. The original fine of €50,000 was reduced to €20,000.", personal data   customer  disclose   different customer  sms  original     reduce  ,1,0,1,0
297,"The claimant was charged for a Netflix subscription that they had not requested. The claimant proved that the Netflix subscription was created by a different person who obtained the personal details of the claimant from Vodafone. The AEPD argued that the claimant did not consent to be charged the Netflix subscription, and as such had fined Vodafone with €40,000. ", claimant  charge   netflix subscription     request  claimant prove   netflix subscription  create   different person  obtain  personal detail   claimant  vodafone  aepd argue   claimant   consent   charge  netflix subscription      vodafone   ,0,1,0,0
298,The games lounge was fined because it improperly used and processed surveillance footage data., game lounge     improperly use  process surveillance footage data,1,0,0,0
299,A nursing care organization failed to act on a request by a data subject to receive access to their data with the scope of erasing it., nurse care organization fail  act   request   data subject  receive access   data   scope  erase ,0,0,0,1
300,The hospital unlawfully charged a copying fee from the patient and violated their right to access data., hospital unlawfully charge  copy fee   patient  violate  right  access data,0,0,0,1
301,A military hospital did not meet the reporting deadline imposed for data breaches. The data protection authority further increased the fine due to the lack of technical and organizational measured to prevent the loss of personal data., military hospital   meet  report deadline impose  data breach  data protection authority  increase   due   lack  technical  organizational measure  prevent  loss  personal data,0,0,1,0
302,A sports bar operated a video surveillance CCTV system that had an angle that extended into a public area that should not have been surveilled., sport bar operate  video surveillance cctv system    angle  extend   public area      surveilled,1,0,0,0
303,Invoicing details of a customer were sent to a third party customer during an invoicing complaint.,invoice detail   customer  send   third party customer   invoice complaint,1,0,0,0
304,The company did not ensure the accuracy of the processing of personal data. This resulted in the disclosure of a client's personal data to a different client., company   ensure  accuracy   process  personal data  result   disclosure   clients personal data   different client,0,0,1,0
305,The company did not comply with measures imposed by the Data Protection Authority., company   comply  measure impose   data protection authority,0,0,0,1
306,A homeowners association used video surveillance CCTV without the proper information displayed in the affected areas. The Data Protection Authority also determined that inadequate technical measures were in place regarding the access and storage of personal data., homeowners association use video surveillance cctv without  proper information display   affect areas  data protection authority also determine  inadequate technical measure   place regard  access  storage  personal data,0,0,1,0
307,The company did not comply with measures imposed by the Data Protection Authority., company   comply  measure impose   data protection authority,0,0,0,1
308,"The company had stored some 500,000 documents containing names, addresses, dates of birth, NHS numbers and medical information and prescriptions in unsealed containers at the back of the building and failed to protect these documents from the elements, resulting in water damage to the documents.The company stored around 500,000 documents that contained the names, addresses, birth fates, and NHS identification numbers as well as medical information and prescriptions in unsealed containers at the back of a building. As a result of this, the documents were exposed to the elements which resulted in water damage and potentially to the loss of some data.", company  store  document contain name address date  birth nhs number  medical information  prescriptions  unseal containers   back   build  fail  protect  document   elements result  water damage   documentsthe company store around document  contain  name address birth fat  nhs identification number  well  medical information  prescriptions  unseal containers   back   build   result    document  expose   elements  result  water damage  potentially   loss   data,0,0,1,0
309,The marketing staff of the health insurance company Menzis had access to patients' data., market staff   health insurance company menzis  access  patients data,1,0,0,0
310,The company ignored objections voiced by the affected parties regarding advertising and marketing calls., company ignore objections voice   affect party regard advertise  market call,0,0,0,1
311,"Nusvar AB, which operates the website Mrkoll.se, a site that provides information on all Swedes over the age of 16, published information on people with overdue payments.",nusvar ab  operate  website mrkollse  site  provide information   swedes   age  publish information  people  overdue payments,0,1,0,0
312,"A website that provided legal information and news only had its privacy policy page available in English, even though it was also addressing the French and Dutch-speaking markets. Also, the privacy policy page was not easily accessible and did not mention the legal basis for the processing of data, as required by the GDPR. The website also used Google Analytics without effective consent.", website  provide legal information  news    privacy policy page available  english even though   also address  french  dutchspeaking market also  privacy policy page   easily accessible    mention  legal basis   process  data  require     website also use google analytics without effective consent,0,1,0,0
313,A company was fined with €511 because it refused to give access to the personal data of an employee who submitted an application to receive access to their personal data., company       refuse  give access   personal data   employee  submit  application  receive access   personal data,0,0,0,1
314,"The government agency was fined due to granting the police access to data and failing to implement adequate measures to secure the data, even after being warned by the national DPA.", government agency   due  grant  police access  data  fail  implement adequate measure  secure  data even   warn   national dpa,0,0,1,0
315,The company was fined for sending marketing messages without consent. No measures were taken to permit phone users to block these messages and no measures were provided that would have allowed the contacted individuals to opt-out of receiving these messages., company    send market message without consent  measure  take  permit phone users  block  message   measure  provide  would  allow  contact individuals  optout  receive  message,0,1,0,0
316,The national data protection authority determined that the company used the Bradford factor for profiling and monitoring sick leave and that this constituted unlawful processing of personal data., national data protection authority determine   company use  bradford factor  profile  monitor sick leave    constitute unlawful process  personal data,0,1,0,0
317,The national data protection authority determined that the company used the Bradford factor for profiling and monitoring sick leave and that this constituted unlawful processing of personal data., national data protection authority determine   company use  bradford factor  profile  monitor sick leave    constitute unlawful process  personal data,0,1,0,0
318,The national data protection authority determined that the company used the Bradford factor for profiling and monitoring sick leave and that this constituted unlawful processing of personal data., national data protection authority determine   company use  bradford factor  profile  monitor sick leave    constitute unlawful process  personal data,0,1,0,0
319,The company unlawfully introduced a video surveillance system at the workplace to monitor employee activity. The Hellenic Data Protection Authority (HDPA) argued that the installation of the system was unlawful because the employees were not notified of the existence of the system., company unlawfully introduce  video surveillance system   workplace  monitor employee activity  hellenic data protection authority hdpa argue   installation   system  unlawful   employees   notify   existence   system,1,0,0,0
320,"The Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) imposed two fines of €11,5 million total on Eni Gas and Luce because of the unlawful processing of personal data during an advertising campaign as well as for the activation of unsolicited contracts. This first fine of €8,5 million was issued for the unlawful processing of personal data in the context of a marketing campaign. The company made promotional calls without the consent of the contacted people and refused to acknowledge people's wishes to be added onto a ""do not contact"" list. The company also did not provide an opt-out procedure for these unsolicited calls. The DPA also determined that the company lacked sufficient technical and organizational measures to protect users' personal data. Data was also processed longer than the allowed retention period. According to the DPA, some data was also collected from third party entities that did not have consent from the data subjects to disclose that data.", italian data protection authority garante impose two    million total  eni gas  luce    unlawful process  personal data   advertise campaign  well    activation  unsolicited contract  first    million  issue   unlawful process  personal data   context   market campaign  company make promotional call without  consent   contact people  refuse  acknowledge people wish   add onto    contact list  company also   provide  optout procedure   unsolicited call  dpa also determine   company lack sufficient technical  organizational measure  protect users personal data data  also process longer   allow retention period accord   dpa  data  also collect  third party entities     consent   data subject  disclose  data,1,1,0,0
321,"The Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) imposed two fines of €11,5 million total on Eni Gas and Luce because of the unlawful processing of personal data during an advertising campaign as well as for the activation of unsolicited contracts. This second fine of €3 million was issued for the opening of unsolicited contracts for the provision of electricity and gas. A large number of individuals have reported that they have only learned of the new contracts after they received a termination letter from their old provider. Some complaints even reported false data as well as forged signatures.", italian data protection authority garante impose two    million total  eni gas  luce    unlawful process  personal data   advertise campaign  well    activation  unsolicited contract  second    million  issue   open  unsolicited contract   provision  electricity  gas  large number  individuals  report     learn   new contract   receive  termination letter   old provider  complaints even report false data  well  forge signatures,1,1,0,0
322,"The fine was issued after a complaint alleging that Enel Energie had processed an individual's personal data and that the natural gas and electricity company was unable to prove it obtained the individual's consent to send email notifications. The national data protection authority also explained that the company had not taken the required measures to stop the transmission of the email notifications even after the affected person had made a request to this end. The company was fined two times €3,000.",   issue   complaint allege  enel energie  process  individuals personal data    natural gas  electricity company  unable  prove  obtain  individuals consent  send email notifications  national data protection authority also explain   company   take  require measure  stop  transmission   email notifications even   affect person  make  request   end  company   two time ,1,1,0,0
323,The company installed video surveillance in order to monitor employee activity. The problem arose from the fact that some cameras were installed in the locker rooms where the staff kept their spare clothes and regularly used to get dressed and undressed., company instal video surveillance  order  monitor employee activity  problem arise   fact   cameras  instal   locker room   staff keep  spare clothe  regularly use  get dress  undress,1,1,0,0
324,A second fine was issued to the company for the unlawful processing of employee biometric data (fingerprints). The processing of biometric data allegedly was necessary to give employees access to certain rooms. The national DPA argued that this was too excessive., second   issue   company   unlawful process  employee biometric data fingerprint  process  biometric data allegedly  necessary  give employees access  certain room  national dpa argue     excessive,1,1,0,0
325,The store was fined because it installed video surveillance that also took images of the sidewalk in front of it and invaded pedestrians' privacy., store     instal video surveillance  also take image   sidewalk  front    invade pedestrians privacy,1,1,0,0
326,The local community of Francavilla Fontana published online the details of an ongoing court trial that included personal information such as health data of several individuals., local community  francavilla fontana publish online  detail   ongoing court trial  include personal information   health data  several individuals,1,1,0,0
327,"The company was fined due to several deficiencies in information security. Two clients of the company had received the same security access key, allowing to view each others' personal details.", company   due  several deficiencies  information security two clients   company  receive   security access key allow  view  others personal detail,0,0,1,0
328,The company was not able to prove that an individual had given them consent to access and process their personal data with the goal of opening a telephone contract. The AEPD further explained that the company unlawfully disclosed the affected person's personal data to third party credit agencies., company   able  prove   individual  give  consent  access  process  personal data   goal  open  telephone contract  aepd  explain   company unlawfully disclose  affect persons personal data  third party credit agencies,1,0,0,0
329,"An individual reported that at the time of their admission to the hospital they had to fill in a form that had a checkbox that indicated that if the checkbox is not ticked, the hospital can transfer the person's private data to third parties. The data protection authority argued that this form was not in accordance with the GDPR because consent was to be obtained from the inactivity of the affected person.", individual report    time   admission   hospital    fill   form    checkbox  indicate    checkbox   tick  hospital  transfer  persons private data  third party  data protection authority argue   form    accordance     consent    obtain   inactivity   affect person,1,1,0,0
330,The Spanish Data Protection Authority determined that the company did not publish a privacy statement on its website and the short legal notice that was posted was not enough to properly identify the company and explain its data processing policies., spanish data protection authority determine   company   publish  privacy statement   website   short legal notice   post   enough  properly identify  company  explain  data process policies,0,0,0,1
331,The company had disclosed the third party data of a client during a property purchase agreement., company  disclose  third party data   client   property purchase agreement,1,0,0,0
332,The Spanish Data Protection Authority explained that the school had transferred pictures of students to third parties who then posted those pictures online., spanish data protection authority explain   school  transfer picture  students  third party   post  picture online,0,1,0,0
333,The electricity company Iberdrola Clientes closed a client's contract without their consent and opened three new contracts on their name also without their consent. The company also transferred the client's personal data to third-party entities without a legal basis., electricity company iberdrola clientes close  clients contract without  consent  open three new contract   name also without  consent  company also transfer  clients personal data  thirdparty entities without  legal basis,0,1,0,0
334,An individual reported having had access to the personal data to third parties in their personal Vodafone profile., individual report   access   personal data  third party   personal vodafone profile,0,0,1,0
335,The Spanish Data Protection Authority determined that a customer of the company had access to the personal data of other customers., spanish data protection authority determine   customer   company  access   personal data   customers,0,0,1,0
336,"The company in question, Dante International, failed to observe the right of a customer to unsubscribe from commercial communications and sent a commercial e-mail to the client in spite of that.", company  question dante international fail  observe  right   customer  unsubscribe  commercial communications  send  commercial email   client  spite  ,0,1,0,0
337,"Vodafone Romania sent an e-mail containing personal data of a client to another unrelated client, thus breaking privacy conventions. They had improper organizational and security measures in effect at that time.",vodafone romania send  email contain personal data   client  another unrelated client thus break privacy conventions   improper organizational  security measure  effect   time,0,0,1,0
338,"Enel Energie sent a client an email that contained the personal information of another client, failing to employ the necessary organizational and technical measures.",enel energie send  client  email  contain  personal information  another client fail  employ  necessary organizational  technical measure,0,0,1,0
339,The SOS Infertility Association failed to provide the necessary data to the data protection authority after it had unlawfully processed personal data of its clients., sos infertility association fail  provide  necessary data   data protection authority    unlawfully process personal data   clients,0,0,0,1
340,"The bank did not provide its customers with copies of credit documentation (interest changes reviews, repayment plans, and loan agreement annexes) in the period from May 2018 to April 2019. In this sense, the bank went ahead and argued that its decision was the right one since the documentation would be related to repaid loans, which a customer shouldn't have the right to access. A data subject alerted the DPA, which demanded that the bank provide copies of the loan documentation to the data subject. The DPA fined the bank (a specific sum is still unknown) taking into consideration the financial institution's continued refusal for over a year to deny the right of access to such documentation to over 2.500 customers.", bank   provide  customers  copy  credit documentation interest change review repayment plan  loan agreement annex   period  may  april   sense  bank go ahead  argue   decision   right one since  documentation would  relate  repay loan   customer shouldnt   right  access  data subject alert  dpa  demand   bank provide copy   loan documentation   data subject  dpa   bank  specific sum  still unknown take  consideration  financial institutions continue refusal    year  deny  right  access   documentation   customers,0,0,0,1
341,"The data was processed inadequately, in inobservance with the data minimization and storage limitation principles of the GDPR. This means the data that was processed went beyond the relevant needs for the purpose of the processing, while also being kept in a form that permits the identification of data subjects longer than it is necessary for the purpose of the processing.", data  process inadequately  inobservance   data minimization  storage limitation principles     mean  data   process go beyond  relevant need   purpose   process  also  keep   form  permit  identification  data subject longer    necessary   purpose   process,1,0,0,0
342,"Upon creation of an applicant portal where interested parties could apply their documents for a job, the food company failed to encrypt the applicant portal. The transmission of the data had no encryption and the data storage was completely unencrypted and offered no password-protected security systems. Moreover, the data was linked to Google, so anyone could find the applicants' documents and retrieve them after a simple Google search.",upon creation   applicant portal  interest party could apply  document   job  food company fail  encrypt  applicant portal  transmission   data   encryption   data storage  completely unencrypted  offer  passwordprotected security systems moreover  data  link  google  anyone could find  applicants document  retrieve    simple google search,1,0,1,0
343,"The Aegean Marine Petroleum Network Inc. failed to inform data subjects that they would have their data processed and stored on the servers. Moreover, the company failed to impose the necessary technical measures and secure the processing of such large amounts of data, while also failing to impose a separation between the relevant software and the data stored on the servers. As a result, companies outside the Aegean Marine Petroleum Group had access to these servers and, implicitly, to the personal data of data subjects, which they copied from the servers.", aegean marine petroleum network inc fail  inform data subject   would   data process  store   servers moreover  company fail  impose  necessary technical measure  secure  process   large amount  data  also fail  impose  separation   relevant software   data store   servers   result company outside  aegean marine petroleum group  access   servers  implicitly   personal data  data subject   copy   servers,1,1,1,0
344,"The company failed to fulfill the data subjects’ rights referring to the processing of their personal data. They have the right to demand a copy of the personal data processed in any circumstance, even without a good reason.", company fail  fulfill  data subjects’ right refer   process   personal data    right  demand  copy   personal data process   circumstance even without  good reason,0,0,0,1
345,The data controller unlawfully restricted data access to the complainant about a child’s data and tax information. The company has thus violated an article of the data protection authority referring to access to the data., data controller unlawfully restrict data access   complainant   child’ data  tax information  company  thus violate  article   data protection authority refer  access   data,0,0,0,1
346,"The client of the financial enterprise complained that the company had transferred his data even though he’d objected to the data processing and provided no information about data processing on request. The financial enterprise said that it had sold the client’s claim stemming from the contract to a third party, which means the data transfer was necessary. However, the Hungarian data processing authority claimed the financial institution had sold the client’s claim and transferred the relevant data after the non-fulfillment of the relevant contract by the client. Therefore, the financial institution couldn’t rely on the performance of the contract with the client.", client   financial enterprise complain   company  transfer  data even though ’ object   data process  provide  information  data process  request  financial enterprise say    sell  client’ claim stem   contract   third party  mean  data transfer  necessary however  hungarian data process authority claim  financial institution  sell  client’ claim  transfer  relevant data   nonfulfillment   relevant contract   client therefore  financial institution ’ rely   performance   contract   client,1,1,0,0
347,"A Directorate employee mistakenly sent 9 letters containing personal data of 18 data subjects to the wrong recipient. The letters included criminal data, data of children, and private data about the subjects. The recipient brought the mistake to the Directorate’s attention 5 days later, and the Directorate notified NAIH only a few weeks later.", directorate employee mistakenly send letter contain personal data  data subject   wrong recipient  letter include criminal data data  children  private data   subject  recipient bring  mistake   directorate’ attention days later   directorate notify naih    weeks later,0,0,0,1
348,"A local bank’s customer requested access to certain telephone conversations recordings and to CCTV recordings. The bank failed to provide access to the CCTV recordings because they also contained data relevant to other third parties. The NAIH concluded that the bank had failed to fulfill the data subject's rights by not responding in due time and by failing to provide copies to the requested recordings. According to the NAIH, the CCTV recordings captured a public space relevant to all the bank's customers, and that the bank could anonymize certain parts of the recordings if need be.", local bank’ customer request access  certain telephone conversations record   cctv record  bank fail  provide access   cctv record   also contain data relevant   third party  naih conclude   bank  fail  fulfill  data subject right   respond  due time   fail  provide copy   request record accord   naih  cctv record capture  public space relevant    bank customers    bank could anonymize certain part   record  need ,0,0,0,1
349,"The data subject requested that his contact data should not be processed. However, the data controller processed his contact data to pursue an enforcement claim concluding that it had a legitimate interest and reason. The NAIH determined that the controller had no legitimate reason to process the data subject’s telephone number, since the address was also accessible, which was enough for the completion of enforcement initiatives.", data subject request   contact data    process however  data controller process  contact data  pursue  enforcement claim conclude     legitimate interest  reason  naih determine   controller   legitimate reason  process  data subject’ telephone number since  address  also accessible   enough   completion  enforcement initiatives,1,1,0,0
350,"The Budapest Environs Regional Court’s chairman, during a meeting for court officials, stated that he quits from the Hungarian Association of Judges, insisting that the present officials persuade their colleagues to do the same. In support of his claims, he brought forth a list containing the membership fees related to multiple members of the Association in Pest county. NAIH determined that the Budapest Environs Regional Court could only process this data for the purpose of payroll management and deduction. Therefore, in this case, the Court had no legal basis for the data processing and disclosure to other persons.", budapest environ regional court’ chairman   meet  court officials state   quit   hungarian association  judge insist   present officials persuade  colleagues      support   claim  bring forth  list contain  membership fee relate  multiple members   association  pest county naih determine   budapest environ regional court could  process  data   purpose  payroll management  deduction therefore   case  court   legal basis   data process  disclosure   persons,1,1,0,0
351,"The employer unlawfully checked the employee's desktop, laptop, and emails to ensure that the employee performed his duties even though he was on sick leave. The employer suspended the employee’s account, leaving no time for the employee to copy or delete his private information (telephone number and messages). The NAIH stated that the employer is obligated to issue a privacy notice to the employee related to the reasons for the monitoring (such as business continuity, internal investigation, and disciplinary purposes). Moreover, the employer should prepare a balancing test to demonstrate the legitimacy of their monitoring purposes.", employer unlawfully check  employees desktop laptop  email  ensure   employee perform  duties even though    sick leave  employer suspend  employee’ account leave  time   employee  copy  delete  private information telephone number  message  naih state   employer  obligate  issue  privacy notice   employee relate   reason   monitor   business continuity internal investigation  disciplinary purpose moreover  employer  prepare  balance test  demonstrate  legitimacy   monitor purpose,1,1,0,0
352,"The Sapienza Universita was fined because it had made public identification data of two people who had demonstrated illegal behavior toward the university. Apparently, the university had inappropriate and inefficient technical access control measures within the management system.", sapienza universita      make public identification data  two people   demonstrate illegal behavior toward  university apparently  university  inappropriate  inefficient technical access control measure within  management system,1,0,1,0
353,"The hospital granted unauthorized access to patient health data to several unauthorized people, giving a trainee and a radiologist access to health data about their colleagues. When the data processing authority investigated the case, they found out that the hospital had employed insufficient organizational measures so as to protect the health data of patients from unauthorized access. This led to the unlawful processing of data by the hospital.", hospital grant unauthorized access  patient health data  several unauthorized people give  trainee   radiologist access  health data   colleagues   data process authority investigate  case  find    hospital  employ insufficient organizational measure    protect  health data  patients  unauthorized access  lead   unlawful process  data   hospital,1,0,1,0
354,"An individual’s personal data, including health information, was published on a website by the local council.", individual’ personal data include health information  publish   website   local council,1,1,0,0
355,"Data related to 15 children with physical and mental disabilities was processed for the purpose of appearing on the Showbie digital learning platform. However, Datatilsynet determined that the necessary organizational and technical measures like risk assessments, privacy impact assessments, and security checkups were not employed beforehand. Moreover, due to the lack of security on the platform, other students belonging to other groups could access the information.",data relate  children  physical  mental disabilities  process   purpose  appear   showbie digital learn platform however datatilsynet determine   necessary organizational  technical measure like risk assessments privacy impact assessments  security checkups   employ beforehand moreover due   lack  security   platform  students belong   group could access  information,1,0,1,0
356,Coop Finmark SA had unlawfully distributed video surveillance showing children under 16 allegedly stealing from a store. The data processing event had no legal basis.,coop finmark sa  unlawfully distribute video surveillance show children  allegedly steal   store  data process event   legal basis,1,1,0,0
357,"The company in question has sent an employee’s payroll to another employee, thus disclosing personal data to an unauthorized party.", company  question  send  employee’ payroll  another employee thus disclose personal data   unauthorized party,1,0,0,0
358,"The Data Protection Authority claimed that the company’s DPO (data protection officer) did not pay sufficient attention to the processing of personal data breaches. Moreover, the company did not relevantly address the issue of the DPO holding multiple positions of authority within the company (head of compliance and audit department).", data protection authority claim   company’ dpo data protection officer   pay sufficient attention   process  personal data breach moreover  company   relevantly address  issue   dpo hold multiple position  authority within  company head  compliance  audit department,0,0,0,1
359,"The company unlawfully processed the personal data of data subject I.S. without the data subject’s consent. Moreover, there were no contractual obligations between the company and the data subject relevant to the data processing. During a period of three months, the company unlawfully processed the data subject’s personal information seven times, each time ignoring the required technical and organizational measures that would ensure the data subject’s security. The Commission for Personal Data Protection fined and the company and forced it to inspect its data processing activities regularly. L.E. EOOD was also compelled to perform risk analyses on its customers and employees, while also performing regular training of its employees. Finally, the company was forced to maintain the utmost discretion and keep the personal data of its employees archived, only to be used in scenarios described by the law.", company unlawfully process  personal data  data subject  without  data subject’ consent moreover    contractual obligations   company   data subject relevant   data process   period  three months  company unlawfully process  data subject’ personal information seven time  time ignore  require technical  organizational measure  would ensure  data subject’ security  commission  personal data protection    company  force   inspect  data process activities regularly le eood  also compel  perform risk analyse   customers  employees  also perform regular train   employees finally  company  force  maintain  utmost discretion  keep  personal data   employees archive    use  scenarios describe   law,0,1,1,0
360,"The company unlawfully processed the personal data of data subject I.S. nine times during a period of five months. Moreover, they didn't employ the necessary technical and organizational measures to maintain secrecy and security of personal data. These data breaches affected the data subject negatively.", company unlawfully process  personal data  data subject  nine time   period  five months moreover  didnt employ  necessary technical  organizational measure  maintain secrecy  security  personal data  data breach affect  data subject negatively,0,0,1,0
361,"The company association violated the principle of data minimization by employing illegal video surveillance of the public space. Moreover, the company also violated the principle of information obligation, as it did not provide sufficient information related to the video surveillance.", company association violate  principle  data minimization  employ illegal video surveillance   public space moreover  company also violate  principle  information obligation     provide sufficient information relate   video surveillance,1,0,0,0
362,"The company unlawfully sent a message via WhatsApp to a third party, containing personal information (ID numbers, first and last name) of the data subjects without prior consent. This is a violation of the integrity and confidentiality principles (Art. 5 (1) (f) GDPR).", company unlawfully send  message via whatsapp   third party contain personal information id number first  last name   data subject without prior consent       integrity  confidentiality principles   f ,1,0,0,0
363,The person unlawfully took pictures of female bathers on a beach. The AEPD was announced by the local police of this incident., person unlawfully take picture  female bathers   beach  aepd  announce   local police   incident,1,1,0,0
364,The company failed to comply with decision TD / 00127/2019 issued by the director of the AEPD. This decision stated that the company was compelled to respect the data subjects' requests for the right of access or erasure of personal data., company fail  comply  decision td / / issue   director   aepd  decision state   company  compel  respect  data subject request   right  access  erasure  personal data,0,0,0,1
365,"The company sent an unsigned and thus invalid porting contract to Vodafone. Since the porting contract was unsigned, the data controller could not provide sufficient evidence of the order. The personal data of the data subject was thus unlawfully processed.", company send  unsigned  thus invalid port contract  vodafone since  port contract  unsigned  data controller could  provide sufficient evidence   order  personal data   data subject  thus unlawfully process,1,1,0,0
366,The company did not comply with the AEPD’s request for access to a data subject’s personal data in a timely manner., company   comply   aepd’ request  access   data subject’ personal data   timely manner,0,0,0,1
367,The company took five months to notify the data subjects of a data breach and another three months to notify the DPA of the mentioned data breach. The data breach concerned an obvious security weakness of the company's IT systems., company take five months  notify  data subject   data breach  another three months  notify  dpa   mention data breach  data breach concern  obvious security weakness   company  systems,0,0,0,1
368,"The unnamed organization had requested its employees to undergo fingerprint scans in order to record their attendance at work. However, as the data protection authority states, the organization wasn’t allowed to rely on exceptions related to the processing of this special category of personal data. Moreover, the data protection authority couldn’t verify whether the employees had given their consent to the data processing.", unnamed organization  request  employees  undergo fingerprint scan  order  record  attendance  work however   data protection authority state  organization ’ allow  rely  exceptions relate   process   special category  personal data moreover  data protection authority ’ verify whether  employees  give  consent   data process,1,0,0,0
369,"The company issues invitations to contacts that its users uploaded without the express consent of the contacts. Moreover, there was no legal basis for this.", company issue invitations  contact   users upload without  express consent   contact moreover    legal basis  ,0,1,0,0
370,"The non-profit organization sent marketing messages to various people despite the fact that the data subjects clearly objected to this and demanded that their data be erased from the organization’s databases. The Belgian Data Protection Authority issues a €1,000 fine as a result. Moreover, the organization stated that it was within their legitimate interests to send those marketing messages, and they weren’t subjected to the obligation to gain consent of the data subjects. The Belgian Data Protection authority found no legitimate interests, though.", nonprofit organization send market message  various people despite  fact   data subject clearly object    demand   data  erase   organization’ databases  belgian data protection authority issue      result moreover  organization state    within  legitimate interest  send  market message   ’ subject   obligation  gain consent   data subject  belgian data protection authority find  legitimate interest though,0,1,0,0
371,The political party was found guilty of forging signatures on a voters’ list., political party  find guilty  forge signatures   voters’ list,0,1,0,0
372,The company was found guilty of erasing data for which a request for access was issued without any legal basis., company  find guilty  erase data    request  access  issue without  legal basis,0,0,0,1
373,The Housing Association illegally published photos with members of the association without the express consent of the data subjects., house association illegally publish photos  members   association without  express consent   data subject,0,1,0,0
374,The company processed the employee data without a sufficient legal basis on hand., company process  employee data without  sufficient legal basis  hand,1,1,0,0
375,The company was fined because it didn’t successfully carry out a DPIA (data protection impact assessment) related to the location data of employees with a particular vehicle information system., company     ’ successfully carry   dpia data protection impact assessment relate   location data  employees   particular vehicle information system,0,0,0,1
376,"Data subjects complained that they received marketing messages from the company despite the fact that they expressly requested their postal data to be erased from the company’s records. Moreover, the company issued data protection information that wasn’t transparent enough.",data subject complain   receive market message   company despite  fact   expressly request  postal data   erase   company’ record moreover  company issue data protection information  ’ transparent enough,0,0,0,1
377,"The taxi company failed to conduct a proper data protection risk assessment of the processed data gathered from a camera surveillance system which recorded video and audio in the company’s taxis, and the surveillance data of security cameras, as well as location data, and last but not least, profiling and automated decision making that was part of the loyalty system. Moreover, the audio data that the company processed came into contradiction with the GDPR principle of data minimization.", taxi company fail  conduct  proper data protection risk assessment   process data gather   camera surveillance system  record video  audio   company’ taxis   surveillance data  security cameras  well  location data  last   least profile  automate decision make   part   loyalty system moreover  audio data   company process come  contradiction    principle  data minimization,1,1,0,0
378,Unauthorized persons had access to a customer list of the accounting firm which contained personal data of the data subjects.,unauthorized persons  access   customer list   account firm  contain personal data   data subject,0,0,1,0
379,"The data controller couldn’t properly demonstrate that the data processing activities under its supervision complied with the required data protection laws. Moreover, the data controller didn’t comply with the obligation pertaining to the right of access to video recordings.", data controller ’ properly demonstrate   data process activities   supervision comply   require data protection laws moreover  data controller ’ comply   obligation pertain   right  access  video record,0,1,0,0
380,"Because of an administrative error, the data subject’s personal data was sent to the CCI (Central Credit Information System) as part of a loan agreement, despite the fact that the data subject wasn’t a willing party in the agreement.",   administrative error  data subject’ personal data  send   cci central credit information system  part   loan agreement despite  fact   data subject ’   party   agreement,1,1,0,0
381,"The municipality was fined €283,000 because of security shortcomings as well as the non-compliance with data processing principles in relation to a module for communication between parents and schools.", municipality      security shortcomings  well   noncompliance  data process principles  relation   module  communication  parent  school,1,0,1,0
382,"The company continuously sent advertising e-mails to the data subject despite the fact that the data subject did not consent to this, and moreover, he’d requested that his contact data be deleted from the company’s database. Furthermore, the company did not respond to the data protection authority’s inquiries for this investigation.", company continuously send advertise email   data subject despite  fact   data subject   consent    moreover ’ request   contact data  delete   company’ database furthermore  company   respond   data protection authority’ inquiries   investigation,0,0,0,1
383,"The data subject received unwarranted and unsolicited e-mails from the company. Furthermore, upon request from the data subject that he is to be informed whenever his contact data is inserted into a database by the company, he received no response from the company in question.", data subject receive unwarranted  unsolicited email   company furthermore upon request   data subject      inform whenever  contact data  insert   database   company  receive  response   company  question,1,1,0,0
384,"The Lejre Municipal Child and Youth Centre was found guilty by the data protection authority of regularly posting small sensitive recordings showing citizens under the age of 18 on the Lehre Municipal Personnel Portal. This portal was accessible by any and all Lejre Municipality employees, despite the fact that many of these employees did not work at the Child and Youth Centre, or whether they had any relation to these cases or not. Furthermore, the data protection authority found that the Child and Youth Centre did not comply with the obligation to inform the citizens in these recordings of this data breach.", lejre municipal child  youth centre  find guilty   data protection authority  regularly post small sensitive record show citizens   age    lehre municipal personnel portal  portal  accessible     lejre municipality employees despite  fact  many   employees   work   child  youth centre  whether    relation   case   furthermore  data protection authority find   child  youth centre   comply   obligation  inform  citizens   record   data breach,1,1,0,0
385,"The insurance company AOK Baden-Würtemberg organized competitions between 2015 to 2019. During these competitions, the company collected the personal data of the participants, among which was the health insurance affiliation. This company had planned to use the data of those participants that had given their consent to send them marketing material. The AOK used particular technical and organization measures to make sure that only those participants that had given their consent would receive these advertising materials. However, the AOK’s standards did not meet the legal requirements in this case. As a result, more than 500 participants to a lottery received marketing materials without having given their consent previously. The AOK- Würtemberg terminated this process as soon as it found out about this issue, as it wanted to examine all the other cases in which it sent marketing materials to participants.", insurance company aok badenwürtemberg organize competitions     competitions  company collect  personal data   participants among    health insurance affiliation  company  plan  use  data   participants   give  consent  send  market material  aok use particular technical  organization measure  make sure    participants   give  consent would receive  advertise materials however  aok’ standards   meet  legal requirements   case   result   participants   lottery receive market materials without  give  consent previously  aok würtemberg terminate  process  soon   find    issue   want  examine    case    send market materials  participants,1,1,1,0
386,The company in question issued a letter in which it made abuse allegations to a particular third party. The third party posted this letter on social media., company  question issue  letter    make abuse allegations   particular third party  third party post  letter  social media,0,0,0,1
387,"The Department of Home Affairs was found guilty of compliance failure with the right of access to personal data as described by Articles 12 and 15 of the GDPR. Moreover, the Isle of Man declared that it would willingly apply the GDPR despite the fact that the Isle of Man is not an EU state.", department  home affairs  find guilty  compliance failure   right  access  personal data  describe  cles     moreover  isle  man declare   would willingly apply   despite  fact   isle  man    eu state,0,0,0,1
388,The company requested access to data from a credit agency without any legal basis., company request access  data   credit agency without  legal basis,1,1,0,0
389,"From 2013 to 2019, the Østfold HF Hospital did not properly control or manage access to patient folders in which it stored sensitive data (e.g. reason for hospitalization). The Datatilsynet concluded that the hospital had not ensured the proper organizational or technical measures required to protect the personal data. Therefore, the hospital had breached both the GDPR and the Patient Records Act.",   østfold hf hospital   properly control  manage access  patient folders    store sensitive data eg reason  hospitalization  datatilsynet conclude   hospital   ensure  proper organizational  technical measure require  protect  personal data therefore  hospital  breach      patient record act,0,0,1,0
390,"The company received a complaint that particular personal data was disclosed to another customer via e-mail. As the company did not comply with the complaint, the data protection authority issued a fine of €4,000 for failure to take adequate measures to prevent unlawful access to personal data.", company receive  complaint  particular personal data  disclose  another customer via email   company   comply   complaint  data protection authority issue      failure  take adequate measure  prevent unlawful access  personal data,0,0,1,0
391,"The data subject received a notification from a debt collection company about required debt payments that the data subjects had to make in connection to Xfera Moviles services. However, the data subject had terminated its relations with Xfera Movies since September 2017. Moreover, Xfera Moviles had breached Article 6 of the GDPR when it processed the plaintiff’s data without consent.", data subject receive  notification   debt collection company  require debt payments   data subject   make  connection  xfera moviles service however  data subject  terminate  relations  xfera movies since september moreover xfera moviles  breach cle      process  plaintiff’ data without consent,0,1,0,0
392,The café bar unlawfully used a CCTV surveillance system to record third parties when it had not sufficiently fulfilled its information obligations., café bar unlawfully use  cctv surveillance system  record third party     sufficiently fulfil  information obligations,1,1,0,0
393,"The company hadn’t complied with the information obligations when it used a CCTV surveillance system to record the public space and passing pedestrians, without their consent.", company ’ comply   information obligations   use  cctv surveillance system  record  public space  pass pedestrians without  consent,1,1,0,0
394,"The National Police Brigade unlawfully made copies of the business records of a specific company for the purpose of investigations. These business records contained data related to other third parties, and the National Police Brigade had no legal basis to process these third parties’ data.", national police brigade unlawfully make copy   business record   specific company   purpose  investigations  business record contain data relate   third party   national police brigade   legal basis  process  third parties’ data,1,1,0,0
395,"The telecommunications company recorded telephone jokes with an app without the prior consent of the users involved in the conversation. This was seen as a case of personal data processing, where the voice of the recorded individuals, upon correlation with the telephone number, could constitute personal data. Thus, the data protection law was applicable in the case of these recordings.", telecommunications company record telephone joke   app without  prior consent   users involve   conversation   see   case  personal data process   voice   record individuals upon correlation   telephone number could constitute personal data thus  data protection law  applicable   case   record,1,1,0,0
396,The Housing Association unlawfully used surveillance cameras and sound recording systems on the staircases and the entrances. The data protection authority concluded that sound recordings involve certain privacy implications and justifiable motivations were required for this to be legal in a residential building. The data protection authority compelled the housing association to stop these sound recordings and to further improve its information on the camera surveillance system., house association unlawfully use surveillance cameras  sound record systems   staircases   entrance  data protection authority conclude  sound record involve certain privacy implications  justifiable motivations  require     legal   residential build  data protection authority compel  house association  stop  sound record    improve  information   camera surveillance system,1,1,0,0
397,"The company was fined because it has unlawfully processed data as part of its marketing campaigns. Apparently, more than a hundred clients reported receiving unsolicited marketing emails, SMS messages, telephone calls, and other marketing automated calls. Moreover, the clients couldn’t exercise their consent withdrawal rights in relation to the data processed by the company because the company’s Data Protection Policy did not provide the necessary information. The data subjects also reported that their contact details had been posted on public telephone lists despite their disapproval and direct objection to this. Last but not least, the company used apps that would process the user’s data every time the apps were used, with the only possibility to withdraw consent for the data processing being available 24 hours later.", company      unlawfully process data  part   market campaign apparently    hundred clients report receive unsolicited market email sms message telephone call   market automate call moreover  clients ’ exercise  consent withdrawal right  relation   data process   company   company’ data protection policy   provide  necessary information  data subject also report   contact detail   post  public telephone list despite  disapproval  direct objection   last   least  company use apps  would process  user’ data every time  apps  use    possibility  withdraw consent   data process  available hours later,1,1,0,0
398,"This company was fined because it used inappropriate methods to process the customer’s data and record the payment details related to the activation of their SIM cards. The data processing authority found out that the company had broken the principles of data transparency, lawfulness, fairness, and the confidentiality and integrity in relation to the processing of the customer’s personal data. This data was unlawfully used for marketing purposes as well as storage purposes on the official website.", company     use inappropriate methods  process  customer’ data  record  payment detail relate   activation   sim card  data process authority find    company  break  principles  data transparency lawfulness fairness   confidentiality  integrity  relation   process   customer’ personal data  data  unlawfully use  market purpose  well  storage purpose   official website,1,0,0,0
399,"This company was fined for having provided telemarketing services for Wind Tre S.p.A. through a certain third party provider. The company did not have a sufficient legal basis to undergo the data processing via the third party provider (Art. 5-7 GDPR), and neither did it have any contractual agreements with this third party provider (Art. 28, 29 GDPR).", company     provide telemarketing service  wind tre spa   certain third party provider  company     sufficient legal basis  undergo  data process via  third party provider    neither     contractual agreements   third party provider   ,1,1,0,0
400,"Google Belgium SA, a subsidiary of Google, was fined €600,000 for rejecting a data subject’s application to dereference outdated articles which were damaging to the data client’s reputation, emphasizing Google’s lack of transparency in the dereferencing applications. The Data Protection Authority discovered that the most articles related to unfounded harassment complaints may lead to severe repercussions on the data subjects’ reputations. These data subjects were justified in requesting Google to dereference or delete de articles. The Data Protection Authority said that the same principle applies to public persons holding political office, despite some slight differences in protection. Google’s rejection of the dereferencing application breached Art. 17 of the GDPR (fined with €500,000). Moreover, the Data Authority Authority imposed another €100,000 fine for the breach of the transparency principle.",google belgium sa  subsidiary  google     reject  data subject’ application  dereference outdated article   damage   data client’ reputation emphasize google’ lack  transparency   dereferencing applications  data protection authority discover    article relate  unfounded harassment complaints may lead  severe repercussions   data subjects’ reputations  data subject  justify  request google  dereference  delete de article  data protection authority say    principle apply  public persons hold political office despite  slight differences  protection google’ rejection   dereferencing application breach        moreover  data authority authority impose another     breach   transparency principle,1,1,0,0
401,"During the local elections in 2018, a communal political association released unlawful election advertisements to the residents. The association had compared the electoral rolls from 2012 to those from 2018 without having the necessary legal basis and without observing Art. 14 of the GDPR.",  local elections   communal political association release unlawful election advertisements   residents  association  compare  electoral roll     without   necessary legal basis  without observe    ,1,1,0,0
402,"The Data Protection Authority performed an inspection on the Arp Hansel Hotel Group A/S to verify whether they had sufficient procedures in place to ensure that personal data wasn’t retained longer than they were necessary for. They discovered that one of the data reservation systems contained large amounts of data that should have been deleted, as per Arp Hansel’s deletion deadlines.", data protection authority perform  inspection   arp hansel hotel group /  verify whether   sufficient procedures  place  ensure  personal data ’ retain longer    necessary   discover  one   data reservation systems contain large amount  data     delete  per arp hansel’ deletion deadlines,1,0,0,0
403,The police officer had used state resources (police database) for private research activities., police officer  use state resources police database  private research activities,1,1,0,0
404,The New York College had directly contacted the complainant by telephone and processed their personal data in a non-transparent way., new york college  directly contact  complainant  telephone  process  personal data   nontransparent way,1,0,0,0
405,"Forbes Hungary published a list of the 50 wealthiest Hungarians and the largest family businesses without sufficient balance of interests, conflicting with Art. 6 (1) f) GDPR.",forbes hungary publish  list   wealthiest hungarians   largest family businesses without sufficient balance  interest conflict    f ,1,1,0,0
406,"The Region’s website had published an enforcement order in the civil proceedings section, which contained the name and place of residence, as well as the amount of the claim.", region’ website  publish  enforcement order   civil proceed section  contain  name  place  residence  well   amount   claim,1,1,0,0
407,The municipal website unlawfully published personal data of data subjects., municipal website unlawfully publish personal data  data subject,1,1,0,0
408,The community unlawfully sent the personal data of an employee to the press., community unlawfully send  personal data   employee   press,1,1,0,0
409,The data controller refused access to the supervisory authority during an audit on the premises., data controller refuse access   supervisory authority   audit   premise,0,0,1,0
410,"Personal data including land and mortgage registers (names, surnames, other personal data) was unlawfully processed on the GEOPORTAL2 platform.",personal data include land  mortgage register name surnames  personal data  unlawfully process   geoportal platform,1,1,0,0
411,"The company had disclosed data of five Tarom passengers due to insufficient organizational and technical measures for secure data processing. The Data Protection Authority stated that Tarom was obligated to instruct its employees to take corrective action in such situations, and perform risk assessment procedures beforehand.", company  disclose data  five tarom passengers due  insufficient organizational  technical measure  secure data process  data protection authority state  tarom  obligate  instruct  employees  take corrective action   situations  perform risk assessment procedures beforehand,0,0,1,0
412,"The data controller failed to implement adequate technical and organizational measures, which led to the processing of personal data (e-mail addresses and telephone numbers) of 81 data subjects.", data controller fail  implement adequate technical  organizational measure  lead   process  personal data email address  telephone number  data subject,0,0,1,0
413,The company failed to notify the data subject within one month about the measures it would take following the data subject’s request for data deletion., company fail  notify  data subject within one month   measure  would take follow  data subject’ request  data deletion,0,0,0,1
414,"The owners association unlawfully exported a still CCTV image and posted it on the billboard of the building. Moreover, the association also violated the information obligations under Art. 12, 13 GDPR. It also violated Art. 25 and 32 GDPR when it gave insufficient information about the CCTV surveillance system, and also because it had failed to take adequate organizational security measures to protect personal data collected by the CCTV system.", owners association unlawfully export  still cctv image  post    billboard   build moreover  association also violate  information obligations      also violate      give insufficient information   cctv surveillance system  also    fail  take adequate organizational security measure  protect personal data collect   cctv system,1,1,1,0
415,The company unlawfully activated several telephone line contracts using the personal data of the data subjects. This was unlawful due to the fact that the personal data of the data subjects was processed by the company despite not having sufficient legal basis to do so., company unlawfully activate several telephone line contract use  personal data   data subject   unlawful due   fact   personal data   data subject  process   company despite   sufficient legal basis   ,1,1,0,0
416,"The data subject stated that another Xfera Movies customer had called him, stating that the company had sent an invoice to his bank account containing the personal details of the data subject. The company had committed a technical error and breached the principles of integrity and confidentiality.", data subject state  another xfera movies customer  call  state   company  send  invoice   bank account contain  personal detail   data subject  company  commit  technical error  breach  principles  integrity  confidentiality,1,0,0,0
417,"The company failed to grant the data subject access to telephone records, despite the AEPD issuing a relevant order in this sense.", company fail  grant  data subject access  telephone record despite  aepd issue  relevant order   sense,0,0,0,1
418,The bank had no lawful right (contractual relationship) to process the solvency and credit information files of the data subject. This was a flagrant breach of Art. 6 (1) of the GDPR., bank   lawful right contractual relationship  process  solvency  credit information file   data subject    flagrant breach      ,1,1,0,0
419,The company had installed a CCTV system without the adequate information of doing so., company  instal  cctv system without  adequate information   ,0,0,0,1
420,The company had ported the telephone line of the data subject from his current company to Telefónica Móviles España without getting the data subject’s consent first. Personal data about the data subject was transferred from the former telephone company to Telefónica Móviles España without a sufficient legal basis., company  port  telephone line   data subject   current company  telefónica móviles españa without get  data subject’ consent first personal data   data subject  transfer   former telephone company  telefónica móviles españa without  sufficient legal basis,1,1,0,0
421,The data subject was charged an invoice for two telephone lines that he’d never ordered or approved. The company had unlawfully stored and processed the data subject’s data without the data subject’s consent., data subject  charge  invoice  two telephone line  ’ never order  approve  company  unlawfully store  process  data subject’ data without  data subject’ consent,1,1,0,0
422,"The company had processed the data subject’s personal data (including bank details, first and last name) to activate three telephone lines that the data subject had not requested or confirmed.", company  process  data subject’ personal data include bank detail first  last name  activate three telephone line   data subject   request  confirm,1,1,0,0
423,"Despite having made a request for erasure from the company’s records, the data subject received another newsletter. The company had confirmed the erasure prior to this event. Apparently, an external service provider of the company had committed an error.",despite  make  request  erasure   company’ record  data subject receive another newsletter  company  confirm  erasure prior   event apparently  external service provider   company  commit  error,1,1,0,0
424,The company was fined for sending direct marketing communications without obtaining the data subjects’ consent first. The form submitted by the company failed to comply with the GDPR., company    send direct market communications without obtain  data subjects’ consent first  form submit   company fail  comply   ,0,1,0,0
425,"Xfera Moviles was obligated by the AEPD to submit specific documents and information but failed to do so. The AEPD issued a fine of €5,000 as a result.",xfera moviles  obligate   aepd  submit specific document  information  fail     aepd issue       result,0,0,0,1
426,"The data subject had made an erasure request, yet the company continued to use the client’s phone number for marketing purposes.", data subject  make  erasure request yet  company continue  use  client’ phone number  market purpose,1,1,0,0
427,"The company made unsolicited marketing calls to data subjects, despite the fact that the data subjects had objected to the data processing. This was also a breach of Article 48 (1)(b) of General Law 9/2014.", company make unsolicited market call  data subject despite  fact   data subject  object   data process   also  breach  cle b  general law /,0,0,0,1
428,"The political party unlawfully used personal information provided by a doctor to contact the complainant’s relative, asking for political support. This wasn’t in accord with the express purpose of the data collection, and it is a violation of the principle of purpose limitation.", political party unlawfully use personal information provide   doctor  contact  complainant’ relative ask  political support  ’  accord   express purpose   data collection        principle  purpose limitation,1,0,0,0
429,"The bank failed to erase the personal data of a past customer, allowing access to other bank employees. The Data Protection Authority deemed this to be a violation of the principle of purpose limitation.", bank fail  erase  personal data   past customer allow access   bank employees  data protection authority deem        principle  purpose limitation,1,0,0,0
430,"The Basketball Federation unlawfully disclosed personal information of the data subjects to third parties, which then published the data on the internet. Moreover, the Federation also disclosed the personal data to a newspaper, violating the principles of integrity and confidentiality.", basketball federation unlawfully disclose personal information   data subject  third party   publish  data   internet moreover  federation also disclose  personal data   newspaper violate  principles  integrity  confidentiality,1,1,0,0
431,The owners community published a document containing personal data (such as information about the identity of the data subjects and related debts) to the public notice billboard., owners community publish  document contain personal data   information   identity   data subject  relate debts   public notice billboard,1,0,0,0
432,"The complainant, former customer of the company, received several e-mails containing electronic bills, despite the fact that he had terminated his contract with the company already. The data subject’s personal data was being processed without sufficient legal basis.", complainant former customer   company receive several email contain electronic bill despite  fact    terminate  contract   company already  data subject’ personal data   process without sufficient legal basis,1,1,0,0
433,"A CCTV system was being used to monitor the public area in front of a building, covering the public space. This situation was in violation with the principle of data minimization. The cameras should have been used in a way that didn’t monitor the public space.", cctv system   use  monitor  public area  front   build cover  public space  situation      principle  data minimization  cameras    use   way  ’ monitor  public space,1,0,0,0
434,"The data subject contacted Naturgy Energy Group S.A. to request professional services for the installation of an air conditioning system. The data subject was then contacted by two companies, one of which was GLP Instalaciones 86, who pretended to be a part of the Naturgy Energy Group. Naturgy denied this claim afterward, stating that the two companies weren’t their employees and they weren’t authorized installers of air conditioning systems either. Therefore, GLP Instalaciones 86 unlawfully processed the data subject’s personal data, including telephone number, name and surname, bank details, and e-mail.", data subject contact naturgy energy group sa  request professional service   installation   air condition system  data subject   contact  two company one    glp instalaciones  pretend    part   naturgy energy group naturgy deny  claim afterward state   two company ’  employees   ’ authorize installers  air condition systems either therefore glp instalaciones unlawfully process  data subject’ personal data include telephone number name  surname bank detail  email,1,1,0,0
435,"A private individual unlawfully filmed a female person while she was using a WC cabin, by sliding the smartphone under the cabin partition wall, with the front camera point toward the female person.", private individual unlawfully film  female person    use  wc cabin  slide  smartphone   cabin partition wall   front camera point toward  female person,0,1,0,0
436,"The private individual published private medical personal data (names, diagnostic findings, medication data, medical diagnoses, social security numbers, data on hospital admissions and discharges, names of treating physicians) of multiple patients on his Facebook page. This data was classified as health data in accordance with Art. 4 (15) GDPR.", private individual publish private medical personal data name diagnostic find medication data medical diagnose social security number data  hospital admissions  discharge name  treat physicians  multiple patients   facebook page  data  classify  health data  accordance    ,1,0,0,0
437,"A social housing company was issued a fine by the Belgian DPA for non-compliance with several of the GDPR principles, such as the principles of transparency and legality.", social house company  issue     belgian dpa  noncompliance  several    principles    principles  transparency  legality,1,1,0,0
438,"Two private individuals were fined by the Belgian DPA for installing video cameras on their property that captured images of the public space and the neighbor’s private property. Moreover, the footage was sent to a third party, as well.",two private individuals     belgian dpa  instal video cameras   property  capture image   public space   neighbor’ private property moreover  footage  send   third party  well,0,1,0,0
439,"The Belgian DPA issued a fine of €15,000 to a company that failed to fulfill the data subject rights. The company works in the debt collection industry, and it was commissioned by another company to collect the debts owed to that specific company. Apparently, the data subject in question was fined by the company for illegal parking, yet the data subject claims that he/she did not receive the notice for the fine. The aggrieved company sent a reminder letter to the data subject, saying that he/she needed to pay the original fine plus reminder fees. Afterwards, the data subject demanded that the data processor provide information about the type of personal data being processed. The company did not fulfill this request in a timely manner, which led the data subject to file a complaint against it. The DPA found that the data controller had violated several provisions of the GDPR, such as that it failed to comply with the data subject’s request for information regarding the data processing.", belgian dpa issue       company  fail  fulfill  data subject right  company work   debt collection industry    commission  another company  collect  debts owe   specific company apparently  data subject  question     company  illegal park yet  data subject claim  /   receive  notice     aggrieve company send  reminder letter   data subject say  / need  pay  original  plus reminder fee afterwards  data subject demand   data processor provide information   type  personal data  process  company   fulfill  request   timely manner  lead  data subject  file  complaint    dpa find   data controller  violate several provision        fail  comply   data subject’ request  information regard  data process,1,1,0,0
440,"A company violated several of the GDPR provisions, which led the Belgian DPA to issue a fine of EUR 50,000 to it. The company is responsible for carrying out parking ticket controls, and it fined a data subject for illegal parking. Though, the data subject claims that he/she did not receive any notification of the fine ticket. What happened was that the data subject received an official reminder letter from a debt collecting firm, where he/she was required to pay the original fine and the reminder fee. After receiving this request, the data subject contacted the responsible party and asked for information on the personal data processed as part of the official reminder. The company failed to provide any information regarding this, which led the data subject to file a complaint against it. The DPA discovered that the responsible party did not provide a clear-cut privacy policy, namely it had no information regarding the processing of personal data, or any contact information of the company. Then, the DPA found that the company failed to comply with the data subject’s right to information by refusing his/her request for information concerning the data processing. Last but not least, the responsible party failed to comply with the principle of data minimization by proceeding to process the data subject’s data to send the payment reminder just a day after the issuance of the ticket, even though the data subject could have paid the fine without the need for a reminder to be sent.", company violate several    provision  lead  belgian dpa  issue        company  responsible  carry  park ticket control     data subject  illegal park though  data subject claim  /   receive  notification    ticket  happen    data subject receive  official reminder letter   debt collect firm  /  require  pay  original    reminder fee  receive  request  data subject contact  responsible party  ask  information   personal data process  part   official reminder  company fail  provide  information regard   lead  data subject  file  complaint    dpa discover   responsible party   provide  clearcut privacy policy namely    information regard  process  personal data   contact information   company   dpa find   company fail  comply   data subject’ right  information  refuse / request  information concern  data process last   least  responsible party fail  comply   principle  data minimization  proceed  process  data subject’ data  send  payment reminder   day   issuance   ticket even though  data subject could  pay   without  need   reminder   send,1,0,0,0
441,"One of the bank’s clients requested access to personal information under Art. 15 GDPR. The bank could not answer this request in due time due to the fact that the client’s insurance contract was lost. The DPA considered this to be a violation of the data subject’s rights according to Art. 15 of the GDPR, and a violation of its obligations to protect personal data under Art. 15 (1) f) GDPR and Art. 32 GDPR. Additionally, the bank also violated the Data Breach Notification Obligations under Art. 33 f. GDPR by failing to inform the data subject of the security incident.",one   bank’ clients request access  personal information     bank could  answer  request  due time due   fact   client’ insurance contract  lose  dpa consider        data subject’ right accord           obligations  protect personal data    f     additionally  bank also violate  data breach notification obligations   f   fail  inform  data subject   security incident,1,0,1,0
442,The company unlawfully sent emails to data subject despite not having a sufficient legal basis to do so., company unlawfully send email  data subject despite    sufficient legal basis   ,1,1,0,0
443,"A police officer had unauthorized access to one of the databases containing personal data about vehicle owners. The police officer then passed information from the database to a third party, outside his/her capacity of work, without a legal reason to do so. The DPA found that the police had insufficient organizational and technical measures put together to prevent any unauthorized access and disclose of personal information from the database.", police officer  unauthorized access  one   databases contain personal data  vehicle owners  police officer  pass information   database   third party outside / capacity  work without  legal reason     dpa find   police  insufficient organizational  technical measure put together  prevent  unauthorized access  disclose  personal information   database,0,0,1,0
444,"The French DPA (CNIL) issued a fine of EUR 2,250,000 to Carrefour France due to several violations of data protection regulations, including those of the GDPR. The CNIL discovered that Carrefour France did not make it accessible or comprehensible for users of the carrefour.fr website and those wishing to join the loyalty program to access their personal data. Carrefour France also had insufficient and incomplete data regarding the data storage and transfer of data to countries outside the EU. The company also failed to comply with the storage time limits, and it stored the data of more than twenty-eight million customers who had been inactive for five to ten years, for the purpose of its loyalty program. The same happened to 750,000 users of the carrefour.fr site who were inactive for about five to ten years. The CNIL discovered that Carrefour France required almost every user to offer proof of identity when they requested a right. Though, the CNIL found out that this request for proof of identity was, most times, unjustified, because most affected users were clearly identifiable without the need for proof of identity. What’s more, Carrefour France failed to respond to a couple of requests from individuals who wanted to access their personal data. Moreover, the company did not erase the data requested by several individuals. Lastly, Carrefour France did not respond to several requests from individuals who did not agree to receiving e-mail and SMS advertising from Carrefour France.", french dpa cnil issue      carrefour france due  several   data protection regulations include      cnil discover  carrefour france   make  accessible  comprehensible  users   carrefourfr website   wish  join  loyalty program  access  personal data carrefour france also  insufficient  incomplete data regard  data storage  transfer  data  countries outside  eu  company also fail  comply   storage time limit   store  data    twentyeight million customers    inactive  five  ten years   purpose   loyalty program   happen  users   carrefourfr site   inactive   five  ten years  cnil discover  carrefour france require almost every user  offer proof  identity   request  right though  cnil find    request  proof  identity   time unjustified   affect users  clearly identifiable without  need  proof  identity ’  carrefour france fail  respond   couple  request  individuals  want  access  personal data moreover  company   erase  data request  several individuals lastly carrefour france   respond  several request  individuals    agree  receive email  sms advertise  carrefour france,1,0,1,0
445,"Carrefour Banque was fined EUR 800,000 by the French DPA (CNIL) for violating its obligations to fairly process data (under Article 5 (1) GDPR). Carrefour Banque officially claimed that, when a client subscribed to the Pass card (which is attached to the loyalty account) and also wanted to participate in the Carrefour loyalty program, the client would have to check a box agreeing to Carrefour Banque forwarding his or her surname, first name, and email address to “Carrefour fidelite”. In this sense, Carrefour Banque expressly states that no other information other than the specific one would be transmitted. However, CNIL discovered that other data was transmitted, including postal address, number of children, and telephone number.",carrefour banque      french dpa cnil  violate  obligations  fairly process data  cle   carrefour banque officially claim    client subscribe   pass card   attach   loyalty account  also want  participate   carrefour loyalty program  client would   check  box agree  carrefour banque forward    surname first name  email address  “carrefour fidelite”   sense carrefour banque expressly state    information    specific one would  transmit however cnil discover   data  transmit include postal address number  children  telephone number,1,0,0,0
446,"CNIL (the French DPA) fined a doctor EUR 6,000 for violating Art. 32 and Art. 33 of the GDPR. The doctor had stored personal data of his patients on a specific server to access from his home computer. This data includes MRI, X-ray images, names, dates of birth, and other treatment data on various patients. However, CNIL found that the responsible person’s systems were vulnerable to external access, due to inadequate security measures. Anyone could access the patients’ data in this way. This data leak had apparently existed for five years. Therefore, the CNIL found that the doctor had failed to establish adequate security and organizational measures that would ensure data security of his patients.",cnil  french dpa   doctor   violate        doctor  store personal data   patients   specific server  access   home computer  data include mri xray image name date  birth   treatment data  various patients however cnil find   responsible person’ systems  vulnerable  external access due  inadequate security measure anyone could access  patients’ data   way  data leak  apparently exist  five years therefore  cnil find   doctor  fail  establish adequate security  organizational measure  would ensure data security   patients,0,0,1,0
447,"A doctor retained personal data of his patients on his personal computer for easier access. The CNIL discovered that the doctor’s computer was inadequately secured, which would potentially allow third parties to access the patients’ medical records. The data included X-ray and MRI images, dates of birth, names, and specific treatment data. The CNIL imposed a fine of EUR 3,000 to the doctor for failing to take adequate security and adequate measures to protect his patients’ data. Moreover, the CNIL discovered that this data leak had been going on for four months.", doctor retain personal data   patients   personal computer  easier access  cnil discover   doctor’ computer  inadequately secure  would potentially allow third party  access  patients’ medical record  data include xray  mri image date  birth name  specific treatment data  cnil impose       doctor  fail  take adequate security  adequate measure  protect  patients’ data moreover  cnil discover   data leak   go   four months,0,0,1,0
448,"The American College of Greece was fined EUR 1,000 by the Hellenic DPA (HDPA) for violating the right of access and the right to demand the erasure of personal data.", american college  greece      hellenic dpa hdpa  violate  right  access   right  demand  erasure  personal data,0,0,0,1
449,"The company denied a data subject’s access to video material recorded by a CCTV camera in a local store (stating that the data subject needed an official order for that). The data subject wanted to use the footage to prove that he or she did not receive change after paying in the store. The company denied access to the footage, this violating Art. 15 of the GDPR, but also deleted the footage after some time, despite the fact that the data subject requested the footage no to be deleted, under Art. 18 (1) c) GDPR.", company deny  data subject’ access  video material record   cctv camera   local store state   data subject need  official order    data subject want  use  footage  prove       receive change  pay   store  company deny access   footage  violate      also delete  footage   time despite  fact   data subject request  footage    delete    c ,0,0,0,1
450,"The Hungarian DPA (NAIH) imposed a fine of HUF 50,000 (EUR 1,385) to the company for having taken inadequate technical and organizational measures to ensure the security of the personal data. Next Time Media Agency Ltd., a web agency, was contracted by the travel agency Robinson Tours Idegenforgalmi es Szolgaltato Kt. (Robinson Tours Ltd.) to devise and manage the agency’s online reservation system. However, the responsible party supplemented the system with real data of Robinson Tours’ customers, despite receiving no such instructions. Overall, the data of over 781 people was compromised between November 13, 2019, and February 4, 2020. Anyone could access the data with a simple Google search.", hungarian dpa naih impose         company   take inadequate technical  organizational measure  ensure  security   personal data next time media agency ltd  web agency  contract   travel agency robinson tour idegenforgalmi es szolgaltato kt robinson tour ltd  devise  manage  agency’ online reservation system however  responsible party supplement  system  real data  robinson tours’ customers despite receive   instructions overall  data   people  compromise  november   february  anyone could access  data   simple google search,0,0,1,0
451,"Robinson Tours Ltd. received a fine of HUF 20,500,000 (EUR 55,400) after the Hungarian DPA (NAIH) discovered that the company’s online reservation system contained unprotected customer data that could be access by anyone on Google. The data contained address and contact data, names, passport numbers, and copies of personal IDs. Apparently, the company in question had hired the web agency Next Time Media Agency Ltd. to create, manage, and test a database for the online reservation system. However, the web agency used not only test data but also real data of Robinson Tours’ clients. The total number of affected customers was 781, and personal data about them was made accessible to anyone in the period from November 13, 2019, to February 4, 2020. The NAIH deems that Robinson Tours failed to perform consistent security risk checkups and screenings, and neither did it notify the affected customers of the data breach.",robinson tour ltd receive         hungarian dpa naih discover   company’ online reservation system contain unprotected customer data  could  access  anyone  google  data contain address  contact data name passport number  copy  personal ids apparently  company  question  hire  web agency next time media agency ltd  create manage  test  database   online reservation system however  web agency use   test data  also real data  robinson tours’ clients  total number  affect customers   personal data    make accessible  anyone   period  november   february   naih deem  robinson tour fail  perform consistent security risk checkups  screen  neither   notify  affect customers   data breach,0,0,1,0
452,"A construction company received a fine of HUF 700,000 (EUR 1,940) from the Hungarian DPA (NAIH). Apparently, the responsible party had installed a video surveillance system on the premises, for the purpose of protecting the property and the physical safety and integrity of its employees. However, the surveillance camera also captured a part of the recreation space where employees engaged in activities disconnected from their professional attributions. The surveillance was thus beyond a required extent. Moreover, the employees in question were not sufficiently informed regarding this when the contract was concluded.", construction company receive         hungarian dpa naih apparently  responsible party  instal  video surveillance system   premise   purpose  protect  property   physical safety  integrity   employees however  surveillance camera also capture  part   recreation space  employees engage  activities disconnect   professional attributions  surveillance  thus beyond  require extent moreover  employees  question   sufficiently inform regard    contract  conclude,1,0,0,0
453,"The Data Protection Authority of Ireland fined the Cork University Maternity Hospital after confirming that the personal data of 78 patients had been disposed of in a public recycling center. Part of the documents included special-category personal data of six patients, among which were future planned care programs and medical history.", data protection authority  ireland   cork university maternity hospital  confirm   personal data  patients   dispose    public recycle center part   document include specialcategory personal data  six patients among   future plan care program  medical history,1,0,1,0
454,"Twitter was issued a fine of EUR 450,000 by the Irish DPA for violating Art. 33 (1) and Art. 33 (5) GDPR, regarding the failure to notify the DPA of a data breach, and the inadequate documentation of the data breach. This data breach was linked to privacy settings of users on Twitter. Users would have the option to set a post as private, in which case only subscribers of that respective user would see the post, or public. A programming bug on the Twitter Android app resulted in posts marked as “private” to be publicly visible to the entire Twitter consumer base. This data breach should have been reported to the DPA in 72 hours and properly documented. Twitter International Company failed to do both these tasks. Their legal team found out about the data breach on January 2nd, 2019, and only notified the DPA about it on January 8th.",twitter  issue       irish dpa  violate       regard  failure  notify  dpa   data breach   inadequate documentation   data breach  data breach  link  privacy settings  users  twitter users would   option  set  post  private   case  subscribers   respective user would see  post  public  program bug   twitter android app result  post mark  “private”   publicly visible   entire twitter consumer base  data breach    report   dpa  hours  properly document twitter international company fail     task  legal team find    data breach  january nd   notify  dpa    january th,0,0,0,1
455,"The Data Protection Authority found out that personal data of several participants in a public competition had been disclosed online. This happened due to a configuration error, where a list of the codes assigned to all the candidates was publicly accessible on the platform for some time, which allowed unwarranted access to the participants’ personal data by other candidates. Scanshare violated the principle of protection of information security, despite being the data controller on behalf of “Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale ‘Antonio Cardarelli” (private hospital), and was fined with EUR 60,000.", data protection authority find   personal data  several participants   public competition   disclose online  happen due   configuration error   list   cod assign    candidates  publicly accessible   platform   time  allow unwarranted access   participants’ personal data   candidates scanshare violate  principle  protection  information security despite   data controller  behalf  “azienda ospedaliera di rilievo nazionale ‘antonio cardarelli” private hospital      ,1,1,1,0
456,"The data protection authority discovered that the hospital had not complied with the information obligations and did not provide adequate processing agreement with the data processor, under Art. 28 GDPR. The incident involved the unlawful disclosing of personal information about participants in a public competition. Because of a configuration error with the platform, the list of codes assigned to the participants was temporarily accessible on the platform, making it easy to access the personal data. The DPA deemed this to be a violation of the principle of protection of information security.", data protection authority discover   hospital   comply   information obligations    provide adequate process agreement   data processor     incident involve  unlawful disclose  personal information  participants   public competition    configuration error   platform  list  cod assign   participants  temporarily accessible   platform make  easy  access  personal data  dpa deem        principle  protection  information security,1,1,1,0
457,"Due to a human error in the integration of two IT systems, personal health data of over 74 patients were made accessible to other patients via the online medical reports on their smartphones. The data protection authority was notified of this breach in due time, under Art. 33 GDPR.",due   human error   integration  two  systems personal health data   patients  make accessible   patients via  online medical report   smartphones  data protection authority  notify   breach  due time    ,1,0,0,0
458,"The municipality refused a data subject’s request to access data from a camera surveillance system, which is perceived as non-compliance with the right of the data subject to access to information.", municipality refuse  data subject’ request  access data   camera surveillance system   perceive  noncompliance   right   data subject  access  information,0,0,0,1
459,"Personal data belonging to persons who have claimed damage reports against the authority was published on the website of the authority without sufficient legal basis. The data included tax ID, first and last name, and address).",personal data belong  persons   claim damage report   authority  publish   website   authority without sufficient legal basis  data include tax id first  last name  address,0,0,0,1
460,"The company engaged in non-compliance practices when the personnel director of the company forwarded an email conversation to four people, regarding the physical and mental discomfort related to the data subject and a work colleague.", company engage  noncompliance practice   personnel director   company forward  email conversation  four people regard  physical  mental discomfort relate   data subject   work colleague,1,0,0,0
461,"The Italian DPA (garante) registered a complaint from the union UILCOM Sardegna toward the call center operator Concentrix Cvg Italy s.r.l. concerning one of the internal regulations of the responsible party. The call center company imposed a “clean desk policy”, where the employees were prohibited to keep specific items on their desks, including smartphones, for the purpose of maintain confidentiality during the processing of customers’ personal data. The company made an exception in the case of medication that certain employees would need to take. However, the medication had to be placed visibly on the desk, which also meant that the medication was visible to other co-workers, indirectly exposing the data subjects’ health status. While the data controller had obtained the consent of all employees regarding the rules of procedure, it did not inform them about the processing of health data.", italian dpa garante register  complaint   union uilcom sardegna toward  call center operator concentrix cvg italy srl concern one   internal regulations   responsible party  call center company impose  “clean desk policy”   employees  prohibit  keep specific items   desks include smartphones   purpose  maintain confidentiality   process  customers’ personal data  company make  exception   case  medication  certain employees would need  take however  medication    place visibly   desk  also mean   medication  visible   coworkers indirectly expose  data subjects’ health status   data controller  obtain  consent   employees regard  rule  procedure    inform    process  health data,1,1,0,0
462,"During a documentary regarding the link between a local ceramics plant and health problems in the population, the television station did not sufficiently anonymize the person interviewed.",  documentary regard  link   local ceramics plant  health problems   population  television station   sufficiently anonymize  person interview,1,0,0,0
463,"The Latvian DPA (DSI) fined an employer EUR 6,250 for unlawfully processing a data subject’s personal data without proper legal basis, sending it to other employees by mail.", latvian dpa dsi   employer   unlawfully process  data subject’ personal data without proper legal basis send    employees  mail,1,1,0,0
464,"The company’s website contained a privacy policy that was not easily understandable, which is a violation of Art. 13 GDPR.", company’ website contain  privacy policy    easily understandable        ,0,0,0,1
465,"As part of the data synchronization of the Population Information System of the Municipal Administration with the databases of the State Centre for Business Registers, an applicant’s personal data who wanted to adopt a child was replaced, through an unfortunate error, with the personal information of the biological parents. This information was accessible in the Population Register of the Republic of Lithuania, which constituted a violation of the principles of accuracy, integrity, and confidentiality of personal data processing, according to Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR.", part   data synchronization   population information system   municipal administration   databases   state centre  business register  applicant’ personal data  want  adopt  child  replace   unfortunate error   personal information   biological parent  information  accessible   population register   republic  lithuania  constitute     principles  accuracy integrity  confidentiality  personal data process accord    f ,1,0,0,0
466,Odin Flissenter AS assessed the credibility of another company and processed personal data related to a natural person (the owner of the assessed company) without sufficient legal basis to do so.,odin flissenter  assess  credibility  another company  process personal data relate   natural person  owner   assess company without sufficient legal basis   ,1,1,0,0
467,"The Data Protection Authority fined Virgin Mobile Polska EUR 443,000 because of a data leak that resulted in unauthorized third parties gaining access to personal data. The company had not taken the adequate and sufficient security measures to protect the data. Moreover, the DPA noticed that the company had not conducted consistent and extensive tests on the effectiveness of the security measures employed. The company would only test the security measures when a suspected security leak occurred.", data protection authority  virgin mobile polska     data leak  result  unauthorized third party gain access  personal data  company   take  adequate  sufficient security measure  protect  data moreover  dpa notice   company   conduct consistent  extensive test   effectiveness   security measure employ  company would  test  security measure   suspect security leak occur,1,0,1,0
468,"The Polish Data Protection Authority (UODO) fined Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń i Reasekuracji WARTA S.A EUR 18,930 for a breach under Art. 33 (1) GDPR and Art. 34 (1) GDPR. Back in May 2020, the Polish DPA was notified by a third party that a data breach occurred at Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń i Reasekuracji WARTA S.A, regarding an insurance agent posing as a processing agent at the company. The insurance agent sent an insurance policy to an unauthorized third party via e-mail. The document contained personal data regarding the subject of the insurance policy, including first names, surnames, residential addresses, and other information. Then, the supervisory authority demanded that the company clarify whether it performed any risk analyses on the data security of natural persons, in connection to the electronic correspondence sent to an unauthorized third party, as this would make it evident that a data breach had occurred. If a data breach does occur, the company responsible is obligated to notify both the DPA and the affected parties. Despite being sent a letter by the supervisory authority asking for explanations on the data breach, the responsible party did nothing to report the data breach to the DPA or inform the affected data subjects about the data breach. Finally, the DPA initiated administrative proceedings, which eventually prompted the company to report the data breach and notify the two affected individuals about the incident.", polish data protection authority uodo  towarzystwo ubezpieczeń  reasekuracji warta sa    breach         back  may  polish dpa  notify   third party   data breach occur  towarzystwo ubezpieczeń  reasekuracji warta sa regard  insurance agent pose   process agent   company  insurance agent send  insurance policy   unauthorized third party via email  document contain personal data regard  subject   insurance policy include first name surnames residential address   information   supervisory authority demand   company clarify whether  perform  risk analyse   data security  natural persons  connection   electronic correspondence send   unauthorized third party   would make  evident   data breach  occur   data breach  occur  company responsible  obligate  notify   dpa   affect party despite  send  letter   supervisory authority ask  explanations   data breach  responsible party  nothing  report  data breach   dpa  inform  affect data subject   data breach finally  dpa initiate administrative proceed  eventually prompt  company  report  data breach  notify  two affect individuals   incident,0,0,0,1
469,The company unlawfully disclosed personal data of employees on the company website due to inadequate organizational and technical measures to ensure information security., company unlawfully disclose personal data  employees   company website due  inadequate organizational  technical measure  ensure information security,0,0,1,0
470,The company failed to comply with the request for information of ANSPDCP, company fail  comply   request  information  anspdcp,0,0,0,1
471,"Several clients complained to the Romanian DPA (ANSPDCP) that Vodafone refused to respond to their requests for access and erasure of data. Moreover, the data controller could not offer any evidence for exoneration.",several clients complain   romanian dpa anspdcp  vodafone refuse  respond   request  access  erasure  data moreover  data controller could  offer  evidence  exoneration,0,0,0,1
472,"The company disclosed the delivery, order, and personal data of more than 1000 customers on its webstore, in a document that could be downloaded and accessed without access protection. This is a clear result of the inadequate organizational and technical measures taken. Moreover, the company also did not notify the data protection authority of this data breach.", company disclose  delivery order  personal data    customers   webstore   document  could  download  access without access protection    clear result   inadequate organizational  technical measure take moreover  company also   notify  data protection authority   data breach,0,0,1,0
473,"Banca Transilvania was fined EUR 100,000 by the Romanian DPA (ANSPDCP) for violating Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR, Art 32 (1) GDPR, and Art. 32 (2) GDPR. The DPA found out that the bank asked a customer to declare the intended purpose and use of a specific amount of money withdrawn from their personal account. The statement was submitted to the bank online, and it was forwarded to a couple of employees of the bank. One of the employees took a picture of the declaration and forwarded it via WhatsApp. Then, the document was also posted on Facebook and another website. Therefore, this resulted in the unauthorized disclosure and access of personal data concerning four data subjects, despite the bank’s commitment to observe the principles of integrity and confidentiality of personal data, under Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR. The Data Protection Authority also noticed that this data breach showcased how under-trained the Bank’s employees were with regard to the standards for data protection. The DPA obliged the Bank to implement stricter and more rigorous technical and organizational measures, as well as trainings for its employees, under Art. 32 GDPR.",banca transilvania      romanian dpa anspdcp  violate   f         dpa find    bank ask  customer  declare  intend purpose  use   specific amount  money withdraw   personal account  statement  submit   bank online    forward   couple  employees   bank one   employees take  picture   declaration  forward  via whatsapp   document  also post  facebook  another website therefore  result   unauthorized disclosure  access  personal data concern four data subject despite  bank’ commitment  observe  principles  integrity  confidentiality  personal data    f   data protection authority also notice   data breach showcased  undertrained  bank’ employees   regard   standards  data protection  dpa oblige  bank  implement stricter   rigorous technical  organizational measure  well  train   employees    ,1,0,1,0
474,"The company failed to comply with the Romanian Data Protection Authority’s requests for information, thus violating Art. 58 (1) a), e) GDPR and Art. 58 i) GDPR.", company fail  comply   romanian data protection authority’ request  information thus violate    e     ,0,0,0,1
475,"Qualitance QBS SA was fined EUR 1,000 by the Romanian DPA because it violated Art. 32 GDPR. The company sent information to 295 individuals by email, where it disclosed email addresses of all the other recipients. The ANSPDCP noticed that the company had not taken adequate security and organizational measures that would have ensured the confidentiality of the data subject’s personal data.",qualitance qbs sa      romanian dpa   violate    company send information  individuals  email   disclose email address     recipients  anspdcp notice   company   take adequate security  organizational measure  would  ensure  confidentiality   data subject’ personal data,0,0,1,0
476,"The Romanian DPA filed ING Bank N.V. Amsterdam – Bucharest Office with EUR 3,000 for unlawfully processing the personal data of a former customer without his consent (e-mail address, and name), as part of a procedure to update the customer’s data.", romanian dpa file ing bank nv amsterdam – bucharest office    unlawfully process  personal data   former customer without  consent email address  name  part   procedure  update  customer’ data,1,1,0,0
477,"One of Vodafone’s customers received electronic bills via email despite having terminated his contract, which was a processing personal data without sufficient legal basis.",one  vodafone’ customers receive electronic bill via email despite  terminate  contract    process personal data without sufficient legal basis,1,1,0,0
478,"The company had a lack of information in the privacy policy section, and an inadequate obtainment of consent, since there was only a general type of consent without differentiating between various types of data processing purposes.", company   lack  information   privacy policy section   inadequate obtainment  consent since     general type  consent without differentiate  various type  data process purpose,0,0,0,1
479,"The data subject wanted to install an air conditioning system, so he commissioned Naturgy Energy Group S.A. to do it. However, he was then contacted by two different companies, and one of them was GLP Instalaciones 86. They pretended to be Naturgy employees, yet the company denied this and further claimed that the two companies weren’t employees or collaborations of Naturgy. This resulted in the unlawful processing of personal data of the data subject, including the subject’s surname, telephone number, e-mail address, and bank details, without a sufficient legal basis.", data subject want  install  air condition system   commission naturgy energy group sa    however    contact  two different company  one    glp instalaciones  pretend   naturgy employees yet  company deny    claim   two company ’ employees  collaborations  naturgy  result   unlawful process  personal data   data subject include  subject’ surname telephone number email address  bank detail without  sufficient legal basis,1,1,0,0
480,"The company did not remove the data subject’s personal data when his/her telephone services contact was cancelled. Moreover, the company sent a warning to the data subject post-cancellation, which was an unlawful processing of the data subject’s personal data.", company   remove  data subject’ personal data  / telephone service contact  cancel moreover  company send  warn   data subject postcancellation    unlawful process   data subject’ personal data,1,1,0,0
481,The company unlawfully used personal data for marketing purposes., company unlawfully use personal data  market purpose,1,1,0,0
482,"The company, despite being a private security company for video surveillance systems, did not appoint a data protection officer, and it thus violated Art. 37 GDPR.", company despite   private security company  video surveillance systems   appoint  data protection officer   thus violate   ,0,0,0,1
483,The company used a membership contract containing a pre-defined privacy policy that prevented any express consent and negotiation of the signing client., company use  membership contract contain  prede privacy policy  prevent  express consent  negotiation   sign client,0,0,0,1
484,"The company unlawfully used a CCTV camera surveillance system to capture the public space, which is a violation of the principle of data minimization.", company unlawfully use  cctv camera surveillance system  capture  public space       principle  data minimization,1,0,0,0
485,Unlawful processing of personal data of a data subject. This happened because of an error in the assignment procedure of the customer contracts.,unlawful process  personal data   data subject  happen    error   assignment procedure   customer contract,1,1,0,0
486,"Vodafone agreed, upon the contract termination in 2019, to delete the data subject’s personal data. However, the data subject kept receiving e-mails from the company, which is a violation of personal data without having a sufficient legal basis.",vodafone agree upon  contract termination   delete  data subject’ personal data however  data subject keep receive email   company      personal data without   sufficient legal basis,1,1,0,0
487,"The homeowners association used a CCTV surveillance system that captured some of the public space, which is a breach of the principle of data minimization.", homeowners association use  cctv surveillance system  capture    public space    breach   principle  data minimization,1,0,0,0
488,"Despite receiving a warning issued by the AEPD (Spanish Data Protection Authority), the company neither granted nor justifiably denied the right of the data subject to erase his/her data.",despite receive  warn issue   aepd spanish data protection authority  company neither grant  justifiably deny  right   data subject  erase / data,0,0,0,1
489,The company sent an invoice to the data subject without being able to prove that the data subject and the company were under a contractual clause., company send  invoice   data subject without  able  prove   data subject   company    contractual clause,1,1,0,0
490,"The company unlawfully posted photos of a person on Facebook and accused the person of theft in other posts. The photos were obtained from the company’s video surveillance system. Moreover, the company encouraged others to share the posts and the photos, which resulted in hundreds of people humiliating, insulting, and threatening the respective individual. The AEPD fined the company EUR 10,000 for the publishing of the photos, and EUR 2,000 for failing to install a required sign for the video surveillance of the store.", company unlawfully post photos   person  facebook  accuse  person  theft   post  photos  obtain   company’ video surveillance system moreover  company encourage others  share  post   photos  result  hundreds  people humiliate insult  threaten  respective individual  aepd   company    publish   photos    fail  install  require sign   video surveillance   store,0,1,0,0
491,"The company violated Art. 6, 13, and 14 GDPR, which prompted the Spanish DPA (AEPD) to fine the company with EUR 40,000. The company is the operator of a phone prank app where you can prank other people by entering their phone numbers. The recipient of the call is called from a suppressed number and “pranked”. The APED took notice of a violation of the operator’s obligation to offer information regarding the collection of personal data of the person to be pranked. Moreover, the company does not inform the data subject (the person to be pranked and recorded) of his/her right to consent according to the provisions of the GDPR.", company violate      prompt  spanish dpa aepd    company    company   operator   phone prank app    prank  people  enter  phone number  recipient   call  call   suppress number  “pranked”  ape take notice      operator’ obligation  offer information regard  collection  personal data   person   prank moreover  company   inform  data subject  person   prank  record  / right  consent accord   provision   ,0,1,0,0
492,"The private individual impersonated a third party on Tinder and WhatsApp through the use of the third-party’s photos as profile pictures. Moreover, these pictures were taken without the express consent of the data subject.", private individual impersonate  third party  tinder  whatsapp   use   thirdparty’ photos  profile picture moreover  picture  take without  express consent   data subject,1,0,0,0
493,"The company was fined with EUR 10,000 by the AEPD for violating Art. 13 GDPR, when it stated on its website privacy notice that a minimum age of 13 was required to subscribe to the newsletter. Moreover, when filing out the newsletter subscription form, the company would take that as a consent to the processing of personal data. However, Art. 8 GDPR states that people under-16-year-olds need the consent of the parents or persons with parental responsibility to consent to the data processing.", company       aepd  violate     state   website privacy notice   minimum age   require  subscribe   newsletter moreover  file   newsletter subscription form  company would take    consent   process  personal data however   state  people underyearolds need  consent   parent  persons  parental responsibility  consent   data process,0,1,0,0
494,"Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. (BBVA) demanded that the data subject settle the debts its debts, despite the data subject having no debts with the bank. BBVA then transmitted the personal information of the data subject to the debt collection company Multigestion Iberia, S.L., which contacted the data subject through phone and e-mail over the course of several months, asking the data subject to pay the debt to the bank. When the data subject demanded that his/her data be erased from the database of BBVA, the responsible party refused to do so.",banco bilbao vizcaya argentaria sa bbva demand   data subject settle  debts  debts despite  data subject   debts   bank bbva  transmit  personal information   data subject   debt collection company multigestion iberia sl  contact  data subject  phone  email   course  several months ask  data subject  pay  debt   bank   data subject demand  / data  erase   database  bbva  responsible party refuse   ,1,0,0,0
495,"One data subject received marketing calls from two different phone numbers of Iberdrola Clientes SAU, despite the data subjecting being registered in the Robinson list. The company acknowledged this human error, saying that the phone numbers that the data subject received promotional calls from were not usually used for promotional purposes.",one data subject receive market call  two different phone number  iberdrola clientes sau despite  data subject  register   robinson list  company acknowledge  human error say   phone number   data subject receive promotional call    usually use  promotional purpose,0,0,0,1
496,"The City of Stockholm had a data breach on a school education platform, where one of the systems lacked the ability to restrict user access to the personal data, thus allowing several staff members with protected identities to access information about their students. Another sub-system let parents access personal information about other students with relative ease. Through Google, you could enter an administrative interface where obtaining information about teachers with a protected identity was made possible.", city  stockholm   data breach   school education platform  one   systems lack  ability  restrict user access   personal data thus allow several staff members  protect identities  access information   students another subsystem let parent access personal information   students  relative ease  google  could enter  administrative interface  obtain information  teachers   protect identity  make possible,1,0,1,0
497,The Municipality illegally used a video surveillance system in a care home for disabled people with specific functional disabilities., municipality illegally use  video surveillance system   care home  disable people  specific functional disabilities,1,1,0,0
498,"The housing company installed a surveillance camera system to monitor a specific floor after repeated disturbances and security incidents occurred there. However, the surveillance system also captured the front door of a resident making it as such that, upon the door being opened, the camera would capture the inside of the apartment. While the original purpose of the housing company was legitimate, the residents’ right to privacy trumps that purpose.", house company instal  surveillance camera system  monitor  specific floor  repeat disturbances  security incidents occur  however  surveillance system also capture  front door   resident make     upon  door  open  camera would capture  inside   apartment   original purpose   house company  legitimate  residents’ right  privacy trump  purpose,1,1,0,0
499,"Ticketmaster UK Limited received a fine of GBP 1.25 million or EUR 1.405 million for using inadequate protection measures to secure the personal data of its customers. More than 9.5 million European customers may have been affected by a data breach between February 2018 and June 23, 2018, because of a faulty chat bot hosted on a third-party online payment site, which made it easy for a potential attacker to gain access to customer’s financial details. The ICO discovered that, among the affected personal details, there were names, expiration dates and CVVs, full payment card numbers, and Ticketmaster passwords and usernames. During the investigation, the ICO also found out that more than 60,000 payment cards belonging to the Barclays Bank customers were fraudulent. Other international banks reported fraudulent activities to Ticketmaster, as well.",ticketmaster uk limit receive    gbp million   million  use inadequate protection measure  secure  personal data   customers   million european customers may   affect   data breach  february  june     faulty chat bot host   thirdparty online payment site  make  easy   potential attacker  gain access  customer’ financial detail  ico discover  among  affect personal detail   name expiration date  cvvs full payment card number  ticketmaster passwords  usernames   investigation  ico also find     payment card belong   barclays bank customers  fraudulent  international bank report fraudulent activities  ticketmaster  well,1,0,1,0