Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -14,9 +14,24 @@ size_categories:
|
|
| 14 |
# Coronary Artery Dataset (CCA)
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-
This dataset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
```bibtex
|
| 22 |
@misc{yang2023segmentation,
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
# Coronary Artery Dataset (CCA)
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
+
This dataset, named the CCA dataset, consists of 200 cases of CTA images depicting coronary artery disease.
|
| 18 |
+
Out of these cases, 20 were allocated for training purposes, while the remaining 180 cases were reserved for testing.
|
| 19 |
+
We have made our training dataset publicly available for further use.
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
+
The collected images are acquired with an isotropic resolution of 0.5 mm.
|
| 22 |
+
Four radiologists participated in annotating the coronary artery internal diameter of 200 cases as ground truth,
|
| 23 |
+
that each case was independently labelled by three radiologists and the remaining radiologist selected
|
| 24 |
+
the best one among three annotations.
|
| 25 |
+
The cases were shuffled randomly and organized into a queue.
|
| 26 |
+
Once a radiologist labelled a case, they were assigned the subsequent case based on the random order
|
| 27 |
+
of the queue. This process guaranteed that each case received labels from three distinct radiologists.
|
| 28 |
+
Importantly, each radiologist remained unaware of the labels assigned by the other two radiologists,
|
| 29 |
+
ensuring the masking of the labels during the assessment. After three radiologists have finished
|
| 30 |
+
labeling, the remaining radiologist examines and selects the best one of three labels,
|
| 31 |
+
completing the combining of the radiologists’ decisions.
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
If you use this dataset, please cite:
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
```bibtex
|
| 37 |
@misc{yang2023segmentation,
|