File size: 5,390 Bytes
43f1a25
dc07d93
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
43f1a25
dc07d93
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
---
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
task_categories:
- image-segmentation
tags:
- medical
- ophthalmology
- cataract-surgery
- surgical-video
- intraocular-lens
- pupil
size_categories:
- n<1K
---

# LensID — lens & pupil segmentation

Segmentation subsets of **LensID** (Ghamsarian et al., MICCAI 2021), a cataract-surgery
dataset from ITEC, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt and the Department of
Ophthalmology, Klinikum Klagenfurt. Frames are extracted from surgical microscope
video of the anterior segment of the eye.

| | |
|---|---|
| Modality | Cataract surgery microscope video (RGB), annotated on extracted 2D frames |
| Anatomy | Eye, anterior segment |
| Targets | `lens` (intraocular lens implant), `pupil` |
| Images | **401 unique** (train 292 / test 109) |
| `lens_mask` | 401 (every row) |
| `pupil_mask` | 189 (train 141 / test 48) — `null` on the other 212 |
| Resolutions | 1024×768 (299 frames) and 720×720 (102 frames) |
| Mask format | binary PNG, single channel, values `{0, 255}` |
| Official split | preserved as released; **no video appears in both splits** |

## Important: `lens` ⊂ `pupil` — the two targets NEST

The intraocular lens sits inside the pupil aperture. Measured over all 189 frames
that carry both masks:

* **99.59 %** of `lens` pixels fall inside `pupil` (per-frame minimum 94.01 %)
* only 68.19 % of `pupil` pixels fall inside `lens`

They are therefore published as **two independent binary masks**. Do **not** merge
them into a single `{0, 1=pupil, 2=lens}` label map — that would silently reduce
"pupil" to a rim annulus and change what the benchmark measures.

## Important: `pupil` is an annotation layer, not extra images

The 189 images in the upstream `Dataset_pupil.zip` are **byte-identical duplicates**
of 189 images in `Dataset_lens.zip` (md5 match on all 189, same split, same
filename). This mirror stores each image **once** and marks pupil availability with
`has_pupil_mask`. Unique images = 401, not 590.

Pupil annotations cover exactly the 189 **non-`case_`** frames; the 212
`case_3xxx` frames have a lens mask only.

## Naming and grouping

`group_id` is the safe key for group-wise splitting or video assembly — it is never
null. `video_id` is null only for the 10 `t1xxxx` frames, whose video of origin is
not recoverable from the release.

| `source_group` | example | `video_id` | n | size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| `case_XXXX` | `case_3155_000002` | `case_3155` | 212 | 1024×768 |
| `Vnn_nnn` | `V11_123` | `V11` | 87 | 1024×768 |
| `Vn_6digit` | `V1000006`, `V000139` | `V1`, `V` | 92 | 720×720 |
| `t1xxxx` | `t10001` | `null` | 10 | 720×720 |

The V-series rule is *strip the trailing 6 digits*. Ten files carry no video digit
and share the bare prefix `V`; grouping them as one video is what makes the paper's
counts reconcile exactly — 21 train / 6 test videos for lens, 13 / 3 for pupil,
27 videos in total.

## Deviations from the upstream archives

1. **`Dataset_phase.zip` is not mirrored.** It is 367 GB of `.avi` clips for binary
   Implantation-vs-Rest *classification* and contains no segmentation masks.
2. **One orphan mask dropped**: `lens/test/V000268_31.png` had no matching image
   (402 masks vs 401 images) and was 512×512 RGB where its group is 720×720 L.
   A proper `V000268` image+mask pair is present and unaffected.
3. **Masks normalised to single-channel `L`.** Upstream ships a mix of RGB and L.
   Every RGB mask was verified to have three identical channels, so this is lossless.
   Values remain exactly `{0, 255}`.
4. Images are byte-for-byte the upstream PNGs; no resizing or re-encoding.

## Scope note

"LensID" is the name of the *framework* in the paper. The `lens` target is the
**artificial intraocular lens (IOL) implant after implantation** — not the natural
crystalline lens and not the cataract.

## Overlap with other cataract datasets

No frame overlap with Cataract-101 (`case_269``case_934` vs LensID's
`case_3091``case_3262`; the ID spaces are disjoint), Cataract-21, IrisPupilSeg,
InSegCat or CatRelDet. CaDIS / CATARACTS-2018 were recorded at Brest University
Hospital, France; LensID is Klagenfurt, Austria. **Cataract-1K** shares the same two
anatomy targets but was recorded 2021–2023, after LensID published — target
duplication, not data duplication. No cross-reference ID column exists upstream.

## License

**CC BY-NC 4.0**, as stated on the official dataset page.

The authors' page adds a further restriction, reproduced verbatim:

> This dataset is exclusively provided for scientific research purposes and as such
> cannot be used commercially or for any other purpose. If any other purpose is
> intended, you may directly contact the originators of the datasets.

This mirror exists for non-commercial scientific research only. Source:
<https://ftp.itec.aau.at/datasets/ovid/LensID/>

## Citation

```bibtex
@inproceedings{ghamsarian2021lensid,
  title     = {LensID: A CNN-RNN-Based Framework Towards Lens Irregularity
               Detection in Cataract Surgery Videos},
  author    = {Ghamsarian, Negin and Taschwer, Mario and
               Putzgruber-Adamitsch, Doris and Sarny, Stephanie and
               El-Shabrawi, Yosuf and Schoeffmann, Klaus},
  booktitle = {MICCAI 2021},
  series    = {LNCS},
  volume    = {12908},
  pages     = {76--86},
  year      = {2021},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-030-87237-3_8}
}
```