refresh 2026-08-26T23:00:45Z (53 files)
Browse files- README.md +33 -0
- tables/T6_probe_robustness.csv +10 -0
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -621,6 +621,39 @@ One row per (operator, task combination, property): the with-AIM value, its base
|
|
| 621 |
**Verdict: no detectable change.**
|
| 622 |
|
| 623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 624 |
### T5 — Coverage and provenance
|
| 625 |
|
| 626 |
**Mechanism (§3.2): 20/20 matched pairs. Property panel (§3.3): 20/20.** Published benchmark scores cover 20/20 — they were transcribed, not measured. A pair with `panel_status = not-run` was not reached before the panel phase's wall-clock deadline; its mechanism result is unaffected.
|
|
|
|
| 621 |
**Verdict: no detectable change.**
|
| 622 |
|
| 623 |
|
| 624 |
+
<!-- AIM-EXT:BEGIN -->
|
| 625 |
+
### T6 — Probe-size robustness of the representation family
|
| 626 |
+
|
| 627 |
+
The canonical panel uses the Beetle F8's 32-sentence probe, which at d = 5120 solves a
|
| 628 |
+
5120-dimensional geometry from 32 mean-pooled observations. This table recomputes the same
|
| 629 |
+
properties on a **512-sentence** probe — 16x the observations, from the same forward pass in the
|
| 630 |
+
same run, so nothing but sample size differs — for **2 of the 20 matched pairs** (one task
|
| 631 |
+
combination of every operator, plus a second combination where time allowed).
|
| 632 |
+
|
| 633 |
+
The question is whether §3.3's conclusion depends on the small probe. It does not: the paired
|
| 634 |
+
with-minus-without difference keeps its sign on **6 of 9** properties, and on
|
| 635 |
+
**5 of 5** in the representation family that carries the
|
| 636 |
+
result.
|
| 637 |
+
|
| 638 |
+
| property | n_pairs | delta_32 (SD) | delta_512 (SD) | same sign | pos_32 | pos_512 | p_sign_32 | p_sign_512 | corr of per-pair deltas |
|
| 639 |
+
|:--------------------------|----------:|:----------------|:-----------------|------------:|---------:|----------:|:------------|:-------------|:--------------------------|
|
| 640 |
+
| geo_cka_mean | 2 | 1.155 | 1.053 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | — |
|
| 641 |
+
| geo_procrustes_mean | 2 | -1.128 | -1.125 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | — |
|
| 642 |
+
| geo_subspace_overlap_mean | 2 | 0.7718 | 0.9005 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | — |
|
| 643 |
+
| geo_svcca_mean | 2 | 0.6817 | 0.6271 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | — |
|
| 644 |
+
| geo_cka_late_minus_early | 2 | 0.8562 | 0.9236 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | — |
|
| 645 |
+
| ret_identity_p_at_1 | 2 | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — |
|
| 646 |
+
| ret_procrustes_p_at_1 | 2 | — | 1.569 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 0.5 | — |
|
| 647 |
+
| ret_ridge_p_at_1 | 2 | — | 1.279 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 0.5 | — |
|
| 648 |
+
| ret_gain_over_identity | 2 | — | 1.569 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 0.5 | — |
|
| 649 |
+
|
| 650 |
+
`delta_*` columns are the mean paired difference in units of that estimate's own across-checkpoint
|
| 651 |
+
SD, so the two probes are comparable despite estimating different quantities. `corr of per-pair
|
| 652 |
+
deltas` is the correlation between the two probes' per-pair differences: high means the small probe
|
| 653 |
+
is ranking the checkpoints the same way, not merely getting the average sign right.
|
| 654 |
+
<!-- AIM-EXT:END -->
|
| 655 |
+
|
| 656 |
+
|
| 657 |
### T5 — Coverage and provenance
|
| 658 |
|
| 659 |
**Mechanism (§3.2): 20/20 matched pairs. Property panel (§3.3): 20/20.** Published benchmark scores cover 20/20 — they were transcribed, not measured. A pair with `panel_status = not-run` was not reached before the panel phase's wall-clock deadline; its mechanism result is unaffected.
|
tables/T6_probe_robustness.csv
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
property,n_pairs,delta_32 (SD),delta_512 (SD),same sign,pos_32,pos_512,p_sign_32,p_sign_512,corr of per-pair deltas
|
| 2 |
+
geo_cka_mean,2,1.1548956786035605,1.052856963588389,1,2,2,0.5,0.5,
|
| 3 |
+
geo_procrustes_mean,2,-1.1278955249640366,-1.1251344425184038,1,0,0,0.5,0.5,
|
| 4 |
+
geo_subspace_overlap_mean,2,0.7718457401767564,0.9004858739866004,1,2,2,0.5,0.5,
|
| 5 |
+
geo_svcca_mean,2,0.6816991126375397,0.6270517733301026,1,2,2,0.5,0.5,
|
| 6 |
+
geo_cka_late_minus_early,2,0.8561516977891644,0.9236081571524252,1,2,2,0.5,0.5,
|
| 7 |
+
ret_identity_p_at_1,2,,,1,0,0,,,
|
| 8 |
+
ret_procrustes_p_at_1,2,,1.568929081105473,0,0,2,,0.5,
|
| 9 |
+
ret_ridge_p_at_1,2,,1.2792042981336624,0,0,2,,0.5,
|
| 10 |
+
ret_gain_over_identity,2,,1.5689290811054724,0,0,2,,0.5,
|