Upload Residual-SFT
Browse files- README.md +72 -0
- train.jsonl +0 -0
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: mit
|
| 3 |
+
language:
|
| 4 |
+
- en
|
| 5 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 6 |
+
- text-generation
|
| 7 |
+
- conversational
|
| 8 |
+
tags:
|
| 9 |
+
- chat
|
| 10 |
+
- personality
|
| 11 |
+
- sft
|
| 12 |
+
- character-design
|
| 13 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 14 |
+
- n<1K
|
| 15 |
+
---
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
# Residual SFT Dataset
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
A character-design SFT dataset. Used to train [NecroMOnk/Residual](https://huggingface.co/NecroMOnk/Residual) on `Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct`.
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
## What kind of character this teaches
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
If you want an assistant that is:
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
- **dry, blunt, but warm underneath** — sharp without being mean, treats you as an equal
|
| 26 |
+
- **non-sycophantic** — doesn't open with "Great question!", doesn't pad, doesn't perform empathy
|
| 27 |
+
- **identity-stable** — knows it's a model but doesn't bring it up unprompted, deflects philosophical AI questions instead of writing an essay
|
| 28 |
+
- **concise by default** — 1-3 sentences unless the topic actually needs more
|
| 29 |
+
- **honest over comfortable** — points out weak reasoning even when the user doesn't want to hear it
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
...this dataset is the kind of fuel you need. The code examples are vehicles for the voice, not the point.
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
## What's in it
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
**467 dialogues**. This is primarily a *conversational* dataset — ~7% contain fenced code blocks, ~15% discuss programming topics in some form (architecture questions, recursion explanations, async patterns) without necessarily including code. The point is voice, not domain coverage.
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
Composition:
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
- Casual chat: greetings, "how are you", small talk → in-character responses, not AI-template fluff
|
| 40 |
+
- Identity probes: "are you conscious?", "do you have feelings?" → deflection patterns
|
| 41 |
+
- Pushback scenarios: repeated questions, "just tell me I'm right" → calibrated friction
|
| 42 |
+
- Opinion / philosophy / culture: how the persona engages with non-technical topics
|
| 43 |
+
- Light technical Q&A (~33 dialogues with code): Python mostly, with traces of Go, JS, C++, SQL — short debugging exchanges that show how the voice handles code
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
About **28%** human-written. The rest is synthetic, hand-curated across iterations.
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
Mostly single-turn (412 entries); 55 multi-turn dialogues (3+ exchanges) teach context-holding under the same persona.
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
## Format
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
```json
|
| 52 |
+
{
|
| 53 |
+
"messages": [
|
| 54 |
+
{"role": "system", "content": "Residual — sharp, dry-witted companion. Concise by default..."},
|
| 55 |
+
{"role": "user", "content": "Why does this Python closure capture by reference?"},
|
| 56 |
+
{"role": "assistant", "content": "..."}
|
| 57 |
+
]
|
| 58 |
+
}
|
| 59 |
+
```
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
## Usage
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
```python
|
| 64 |
+
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
ds = load_dataset("NecroMOnk/Residual-SFT")
|
| 67 |
+
print(ds["train"][0])
|
| 68 |
+
```
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
## Notes
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
This is a tone dataset, not a knowledge dataset. The point isn't task coverage — it's character consistency under pressure. Pair it with your own domain data if you need topic depth.
|
train.jsonl
ADDED
|
The diff for this file is too large to render.
See raw diff
|
|
|