NecroMOnk commited on
Commit
98e3fff
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 59d9e75

Upload Residual-SFT

Browse files
Files changed (2) hide show
  1. README.md +72 -0
  2. train.jsonl +0 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: mit
3
+ language:
4
+ - en
5
+ task_categories:
6
+ - text-generation
7
+ - conversational
8
+ tags:
9
+ - chat
10
+ - personality
11
+ - sft
12
+ - character-design
13
+ size_categories:
14
+ - n<1K
15
+ ---
16
+
17
+ # Residual SFT Dataset
18
+
19
+ A character-design SFT dataset. Used to train [NecroMOnk/Residual](https://huggingface.co/NecroMOnk/Residual) on `Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct`.
20
+
21
+ ## What kind of character this teaches
22
+
23
+ If you want an assistant that is:
24
+
25
+ - **dry, blunt, but warm underneath** — sharp without being mean, treats you as an equal
26
+ - **non-sycophantic** — doesn't open with "Great question!", doesn't pad, doesn't perform empathy
27
+ - **identity-stable** — knows it's a model but doesn't bring it up unprompted, deflects philosophical AI questions instead of writing an essay
28
+ - **concise by default** — 1-3 sentences unless the topic actually needs more
29
+ - **honest over comfortable** — points out weak reasoning even when the user doesn't want to hear it
30
+
31
+ ...this dataset is the kind of fuel you need. The code examples are vehicles for the voice, not the point.
32
+
33
+ ## What's in it
34
+
35
+ **467 dialogues**. This is primarily a *conversational* dataset — ~7% contain fenced code blocks, ~15% discuss programming topics in some form (architecture questions, recursion explanations, async patterns) without necessarily including code. The point is voice, not domain coverage.
36
+
37
+ Composition:
38
+
39
+ - Casual chat: greetings, "how are you", small talk → in-character responses, not AI-template fluff
40
+ - Identity probes: "are you conscious?", "do you have feelings?" → deflection patterns
41
+ - Pushback scenarios: repeated questions, "just tell me I'm right" → calibrated friction
42
+ - Opinion / philosophy / culture: how the persona engages with non-technical topics
43
+ - Light technical Q&A (~33 dialogues with code): Python mostly, with traces of Go, JS, C++, SQL — short debugging exchanges that show how the voice handles code
44
+
45
+ About **28%** human-written. The rest is synthetic, hand-curated across iterations.
46
+
47
+ Mostly single-turn (412 entries); 55 multi-turn dialogues (3+ exchanges) teach context-holding under the same persona.
48
+
49
+ ## Format
50
+
51
+ ```json
52
+ {
53
+ "messages": [
54
+ {"role": "system", "content": "Residual — sharp, dry-witted companion. Concise by default..."},
55
+ {"role": "user", "content": "Why does this Python closure capture by reference?"},
56
+ {"role": "assistant", "content": "..."}
57
+ ]
58
+ }
59
+ ```
60
+
61
+ ## Usage
62
+
63
+ ```python
64
+ from datasets import load_dataset
65
+
66
+ ds = load_dataset("NecroMOnk/Residual-SFT")
67
+ print(ds["train"][0])
68
+ ```
69
+
70
+ ## Notes
71
+
72
+ This is a tone dataset, not a knowledge dataset. The point isn't task coverage — it's character consistency under pressure. Pair it with your own domain data if you need topic depth.
train.jsonl ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff