Datasets:
Modalities:
Image
Languages:
English
Size:
100M<n<1B
Tags:
computer-vision
autonomous-driving
driver-attention
gaze-estimation
semantic-segmentation
dataset
License:
Update README.md
Browse filesSupplement the details of the experimental scene
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -23,9 +23,43 @@ size_categories:
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
# DATAD: Driver Attention in Takeover of Autonomous Driving
|
| 25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 26 |
This dataset provides **multimodal recordings** for analyzing driver attention during **takeover scenarios in autonomous driving**.
|
| 27 |
-
It includes **gaze
|
| 28 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
---
|
| 31 |
|
|
@@ -123,3 +157,5 @@ These files provide **low-level driving signals, ego vehicle states, and scene-l
|
|
| 123 |
- `Gaze_object_output/` (gaze–object annotations)
|
| 124 |
- `Tester*_IS/` (instance segmentation outputs)
|
| 125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
# DATAD: Driver Attention in Takeover of Autonomous Driving
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
+
## Dataset Overview
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
This dataset provides **multimodal recordings** for analyzing driver attention during **takeover scenarios in autonomous driving**.
|
| 29 |
+
It includes **gaze–object annotations, per-frame feature vectors, and instance segmentation outputs**, supporting research in **driver monitoring, gaze estimation, takeover performance, and semantic scene understanding**.
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
## Data Organization and Participants
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
Data are organized **per participant**, with each participant’s data compressed and uploaded individually in **7Z format**.
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
- **Tester1–Tester10**: university students with driving experience
|
| 36 |
+
- **Tester11–Tester30**: experienced drivers (ride-hailing drivers)
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
The two participant groups were exposed to **different scenario designs**.
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
## Scenario Design
|
| 42 |
+
### Tester1–Tester10 (Student Drivers)
|
| 43 |
+
Two major categories of **explicit high-risk scenarios**, each containing:
|
| 44 |
+
- **One primary risk**
|
| 45 |
+
- **One secondary risk**
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
Scenario categories:
|
| 48 |
+
1. **Road construction ahead**
|
| 49 |
+
2. **Sudden intrusion of non-motorized vehicles**
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
Each category includes multiple concrete scenarios generated by **varying background vehicle behaviors**.
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
### Tester11–Tester30 (Experienced Drivers)
|
| 55 |
+
**Progressive risk scenarios** with latent and gradually emerging hazards, divided into two major categories:
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
1. **Right-side vehicle squeezing lane change + left-side non-motorized sudden appearance**
|
| 58 |
+
2. **Left-side non-motorized vehicle intrusion + front traffic accident**
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
Similarly, each category is instantiated into multiple scenarios by **adjusting background traffic behaviors**.
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
Overall, the dataset enables comparative analysis of **driver attention and takeover behavior across driver experience levels and scenario complexities**.
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
---
|
| 65 |
|
|
|
|
| 157 |
- `Gaze_object_output/` (gaze–object annotations)
|
| 158 |
- `Tester*_IS/` (instance segmentation outputs)
|
| 159 |
|
| 160 |
+
|
| 161 |
+
|