Clarify significance claim in baselines
Browse files- DEEPARITHMARK_DESIGN.md +2 -1
DEEPARITHMARK_DESIGN.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -280,7 +280,8 @@ a definable ceiling. It also shows the benchmark is not degenerate — it is not
|
|
| 280 |
### The 2026 band: the first sub-1B gradient
|
| 281 |
|
| 282 |
Qwen3-0.6B-Base (596 M) is the first sub-1B base model in the table to clear
|
| 283 |
-
chance: **29.20 %**, p = 0.0027 against 25 %
|
|
|
|
| 284 |
show the *shape* of partial skill rather than a flat line — the depth curve
|
| 285 |
decreases monotonically and is significant at both ends (n = 250 per tier):
|
| 286 |
|
|
|
|
| 280 |
### The 2026 band: the first sub-1B gradient
|
| 281 |
|
| 282 |
Qwen3-0.6B-Base (596 M) is the first sub-1B base model in the table to clear
|
| 283 |
+
chance significantly: **29.20 %**, p = 0.0027 against 25 % (GPT-X3-150M's 25.2 %
|
| 284 |
+
is nominally above chance but p = 0.44). More importantly it is the first to
|
| 285 |
show the *shape* of partial skill rather than a flat line — the depth curve
|
| 286 |
decreases monotonically and is significant at both ends (n = 250 per tier):
|
| 287 |
|