TeamNull commited on
Commit
5eb0e97
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 3d84138

Clarify significance claim in baselines

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. DEEPARITHMARK_DESIGN.md +2 -1
DEEPARITHMARK_DESIGN.md CHANGED
@@ -280,7 +280,8 @@ a definable ceiling. It also shows the benchmark is not degenerate — it is not
280
  ### The 2026 band: the first sub-1B gradient
281
 
282
  Qwen3-0.6B-Base (596 M) is the first sub-1B base model in the table to clear
283
- chance: **29.20 %**, p = 0.0027 against 25 %. More importantly it is the first to
 
284
  show the *shape* of partial skill rather than a flat line — the depth curve
285
  decreases monotonically and is significant at both ends (n = 250 per tier):
286
 
 
280
  ### The 2026 band: the first sub-1B gradient
281
 
282
  Qwen3-0.6B-Base (596 M) is the first sub-1B base model in the table to clear
283
+ chance significantly: **29.20 %**, p = 0.0027 against 25 % (GPT-X3-150M's 25.2 %
284
+ is nominally above chance but p = 0.44). More importantly it is the first to
285
  show the *shape* of partial skill rather than a flat line — the depth curve
286
  decreases monotonically and is significant at both ends (n = 250 per tier):
287