Rewrap new score paragraphs; point baselines at the 17-model file

README.md

@@ -184,10 +184,10 @@ Base scores **75.70 %** on ArithMark 3.0, the highest sub-1B result here, and
 3.0 — the highest figure in this table — and 31.70 % here: a **61.4-point** drop,
 larger than granite-4.0-350M's 51.6. It is also the only model whose depth-3
 bucket stays within three points of its depth-2 bucket with both above chance
-(41.2 → 38.4, p = 3e−6) before falling off a cliff at depth 4 (23.6). That skill is concentrated in two templates:
-`share_then_split` 93.2 % and `time_clock_end` 77.3 %, with `money_discount_fee`
-at 3.3 %. A 1.7 B model that nearly aces another benchmark is still a
-single-template specialist here.
+(41.2 → 38.4, p = 3e−6) before falling off a cliff at depth 4 (23.6). That
+skill is concentrated in two templates: `share_then_split` 93.2 % and
+`time_clock_end` 77.3 %, with `money_discount_fee` at 3.3 %. A 1.7 B model that
+nearly aces another benchmark is still a single-template specialist here.
 
 **Scaling 0.6 B → 3.1 B buys about seven points.** Qwen3-0.6B 29.2,
 granite-1B 29.9, LFM3-1.7B 31.7, Qwen3.5-2B 36.0, SmolLM3-3B 36.5: a 5× parameter