| [ | |
| "the purce of russian biglogists by devia jono seers e2te,2 comsiouplaco in stalinist rusete, ond the newo thet diglestets exo to ouffor the fate of musicians, ertiote, selltiatans {rt sdsintotratore, vould not coon pertioulerly otartling: teee in reality it 19 @ now departure. previous hereay-munts coveses seiy bis ford of nan and inte scolar institutions. now lature hore self mut too the linc. the \"neu genetics\", founded by one ifchuxtn, snd uhove crch-priest eanp> weenko wor inown tn ussta before the wer, 20.0 mingri sete, naat ewolon lclogtgte tele idoos tn donaen with thats, western counterparts, ond thedx work was bold in high regurd. ta august this povition cas chenged, \"recottonaty\" biologists vere atenfosed from loading posts, end lysenkole dees vere declobed tho gniy true faith. fis report'to the lonin soadony of hgrical trol sctenceo hes now been published in snglish, end helpo fo throw light on the utter. lysenko's \"rats\" genbtics _lyconkots seientifie ideas ere laost inextricably nixed with 'nis political ond philosophical views, ond it 40 dificult to deel vith then clone. \"but the follove ing {8 very brief sketch. the gencrolly accepted morgan-lendol theory of horedity states that inherited char.ctoristies of ors:nisna axe determined by wlio sieroucopic bedies cvlled genes. theve az located 4n the chrono- cones, vhich cro fibro-ldke mtericls in the nuoleus of ecch cell. beery body-coll conteins tvo duplicate sets of chronosoues (ct ru know of wore then two, but thoy \"rao ainority). men the cello divide during tho orrnisn's rovth the chroaocome outfit stvides too, ond cach new coll contains an adantical double oet of chronesones to the origins1. mow the reproductive cells -speras gnd ove ~- are obtained by 4 \"roduetion division\", which halves 'the chronosome outfit: thoso roprodustive celle contain only one sot of chromosoacs. fertiliv. tion consists of tho waiting of to such cells ~one from the mothor, one from tho fathor - miking 9 how cei] contoining 9 noranl double eet, vhich can thon divide ond piasiviie eo tho enbryo grows,", | |
| "200 hov-de0 3948 sccordine to thtv thooryy the genes ore norselly wnttested gonit tions of life of to ongition, sinee tay ore' te aela senzere of hereditory olszodtistotion, those en cise woeteoted. tn othor vor dogudaod sanrcotone ato not tnuesitoty changes' the cence = \"sutotiona\" ~ norssily ooow syontons cunly ond age bot roku ty oxtoral contstonne tf gust be unforateot yaot de thoory {vce not dry tho fost of the coniltions of atte on te sreandoss for instotca tnhoritog coatooterse tien bay not be an festod hor wigeyourstlo contitionns put taonuush bo' te' genes 'ze noffootod hy these cos sions, tbe hotly slgo vill be ure segcoted, ond taoutsblo, soni tions will bring vat the inturt tot stassetstte tion tn tw oofopeing. 'youmko complotoly dontos this viow. ho ola ine that not the gonos alonc but tho whole orgamion is responsible for heredity, vhich in consequence 4s affooted by tho conditions of its life. 'no affime tho inhorttanse of soquized chasccteristics, ond eloins thot ho oan brok up hie otatomonts with foots, wberous' tho organ tovohing \"oun cite no evidence to prove ite point.\" (p.13 of his report) only a oxport biologist who de thoroughly fonilior with the field oan offize 2 view on the corrcotnoss or otherwise of lyacnkole ideas, ond tho suthor of this article mkos no olein to do so. tt as nodossary to say, hosover, that 11 the ost zouous diolog in ruseia 19 voll a8 duch lotding biologists ex c.d.derlington ond 5.3.8. usldano inve opposed lysenkolc viuws. \"clearly hie stote- rant thot his oppononts \"eon cite no evidenco\" tn thoi fevour 4 sbourd in its bonbust. in ony ccso, whatever tho norits of the di pute, it ie the strliniet muthods of iysonko which azo our min concur. first, hovover, 0 fur verds in gonorel on his apparent valuo ud 4 sciontist. tysaiko's wsexexc\" one ronoxiablo thing 49 tho olan dor ospurimentel evidence which be eftoy sn ofdor to overthron tho whole otmusturs af sodemm genotios, in mts report ho doceribod one experinonts on foaste plents which ore supposed to prove be point. bric achby. (toxrfson profoasor of botany at menohootor untverstty, outhor of the poltoan book \"setontict in russia\"), who hneo seen wiese vxpuriwents, giouloacs then, coying thot the plants used wore too oul] in munbur, of uicortain poligroe, and inteotod with a viru disoase thot would motorinlly ctfoct tho rooult. agein, replying to the aeode~totin hukowky who had sckd ho would beliowe iysonko 4f ho sow vegetative hybrids.\" lysanko roforzod to \"josons ind hundreds\" of oush oxaaploa to bs eoen in tusois for ot", | |
| "a2 nov-2e0 1948 yt 2 decade. biter the good zhukoveky mst have boon 2 blind hormit, or lysonko ves indulging in another plese of boubrst. ho mckes truly rosorkeble olcim: \"once wo cecopt the absolutely 'true ond gonorally jom proposition that the reproduction cells, or 'the gars, of now organisms aro produscd ty, the organiam, by ite ody, end' not by the very sone reproductive' cell from which tho given, slroady mtuze, orgenten croso, nothing is left of tho \"nat\" ghronosomo theory of heredity.\" (p.15}. so apperently the beliefo of most biologists, j.b.s,lislens included, oxe so sbourd that a ngonerally 'now proposition\" vill refute them! and still morgente gencties stend, the standord textbook in nny russian collogss gntil teoontly expounded this gonotios (as lysorko adnits, p.17), tnd tho now geneties \"ie not so far tought in our univorsitice audecolleges<\"\" (p34). indood, bourguotsdderlist sabotage and suppression of tho truth has ben effective! tn ons place iyocnko vontuses outelde, the fold 6f ology xith tomorkeblo cffect., he is attacking the usc of stetistics in genctics fset sues fetes\" ty the may} te exsace ae follove. since speeeceal ety charcctarect thy offstdlen 40 dotapsined won tho ro- productive colle which originnto it wiilte, the hich deter byoeuetys chirtotsr fo the chresosom cutfsb of these tonreauethye sane ghidscivcas ths in tum ie dotorainod ty the \"soduotion se eee avehs. pesont organises which how given rive 0 these serhet on in toes rodtstion divisions, oloaunte of chance exter ger ti zoretion of the (single) shronceome sot of tho ropromuetive sri ee shsococonoo may be dntwn fron olthar of tho two gota in beate echt eeh sea any ty further conpiiootoa ty torassing\" of thooe chromosomes, not to speak of mtstions. the tee [ts of breeding carmen te' ercfone' show vandounoest but by dokng otough ox seme ond applying ot=tioticel onslyste to the resulta, volumble pee en my be sbtcinod about the atrusture ond bubrvdour of the chrouogoner lysonko fulninates ogeinst such nidoalistic\"nothots. uneble to reveal the low of living yotar, the morganists hewo to resort to tho thoory of probebilities, \"nd, oinco thoy foi) to group the conerete cantant of bhologiesl procosces, they 70 guce blological soicnes to moro stotietics... physics =nd chon {etry hove boon tid of fortubtion. tht ia why thoy have become mack solenooss ++ sy rilsinye our sotonce of mundelton-worgsnser yolesoonion wo vill gap] fortuition frog plologicn) sckunoo. we hust firmly rummbor tot science ee ee siaco\"tet)", | |
| "wrat. - 22. ____now-tee 1548 lot te bare take note! chance 49 0 trotakyist ~ sorry, organist deviation, and will not be tolerated in raveis. and is it true thet physics and choaistzy heve been rid of fortultion? one of the nost important advances in chemistry of the last quarter century has been tho growth of chouical kinetics, the study of the progress of chenicel change. this branch of tho science essentially studies the collision of molecules end their absorption of energy. such phenomena aze completely random es fer as individusl molecules fare conserned, tut display oxact lave whon the vast muabors of molo- cules concerned in nrdinsry reactions are considered. tims wo my sy that efter oortain tino # givon proportion of aolecules, sey 4, have roacted, ond this may be detoreined oxaotly: but for any' individual molecule we oan only say that it hed a probability of reacting of one in threo. thus in one of its most inportent fields, cheuistry 1s en ontirely statistical sotene in bie 14t4te book who niyviotst schicetinger exploine that oll the ex tot physioel love azo statistical, and depend tor thelr scourcy \"on tho weet, muabors of uolecules thit are concerned, iysenco ean aay have boon ignorant of thisy zor he bitterly setaoke te sock sn another comoction, \"tho, trouble i2 yen geepsr than this)\" however. for stuy of the eton tne sevoriod # lav inorn a8. the unoortainty principle, according to which it is impossible to know simultencously both the poolilon'und menoniae ata folpe ae ls 7 dogray of insert etinis iniosds pot af eignitioesce thon vo deel with mimte bodies' ike sissi bm slaton the hou ftnnes of in (uta fitsios\", 1997)1 maho uay-of crusetion, sgsosting to thich the couree of ownte in on isolvto? sped ir ochpletoly dotorained ty tho state of the ayoton at tine t =o, lonve {to vollditfy af any rote {nthe sone ef clossionl qhyoise.\" fk me on to say that furthor sevelopmnt of theory makes st possible to catstish # obein of emus tnt offucto, tut in that case me do not kroy the initial state exactly. sn thio sutee the lav of cmusetion to therefore enpiyy piysice sen the nature of tho caso indetwrninatey and thenetore the affoir of nadotics.\" tt would appoar thet lyvonko's agroranco of tho abc of modern physics ont chonistzy dees not provent him fron mking crass assortions about thove solonevs, this gives us @ masure of his valu general.", | |
| "wr ae ov-noe 1948 iysenko's \"marxist\" fallosofht it 4 lysenko! politis that neck ' closest attention. fo clains that hie theory elone 1s coupatible with dialectios) begerialion: \"the materia jist thoory of the evolution nf living are involves recognition of the nocessity of hereditary trans rfsion of inlividual characteristics soquized by the oxgentam under she sondi tions of its life: it io unthinkable without reoynttion ope\" iihoritence of acguized cheroctors.\" (p.9). | and syibtric- flay, bio opponenite zepresent philosophical idee list iw tiktortunately he makes no attoupt to argue his phtlosophice) casey eee show the necessary comisction between tho solentific theort vad the corresponding philosophies. in fact, be yors's teaching. ye attempts to tranoplent marx! were eelationsidp of san and his environsent to the world of natural selence. warxisn teachoo thet tho conditions of mants life dotersine hs wereitousness, and at the sane tine his consciousness reqote tool soechtcts hie conditions of life. the saterialist dootring of the mist postulate is quilified by the dialectical epproech of the shnot poe ercivm toachoa that inheritance of soquized charsoter feties in the zealm of man's mind and nis lift vor heir to chenged external conditions. nis does not conflict in the loast with the idee of the inher! fence te oitly charecteristion which are indopendent of environment pro snoula edd; indopondent in the short run, tre- leaving ont (we ghewmeiection.) thus @ man say have @ liking for mate ond ah appreeietion of ito value, 08 @ rouult of boing born 190 8 toll) where such things oe eptoened. | but he will not have suies for susice1 composition or exocutdon unless he hae te sisit pono structure, zor musioe) cit ia epperontly phystondy hereditary charscteriotio. gecnko'e conaopiton of stantertelist, spncticnl habry and 16 {fine soe et gest seon ttn somuillty vileort foe o tarate wioks mothe.", | |
| "warde te wov-doo i948 'the veluo of marx!e tonching mies in {te correspondance with tho facts... por that resuon bourgeois historians, whore thoy aro gomainoly conoarned with truth, axe compollod to adapt tho easence of linzx't analytical mothod. \"of course, thoy roject the positive world-changing side of marxism. dut ve must emphasise that the jottor would have no significance 4f it wore not for the objective 'ruth of tho theory. sinilorly, the test of @ naturel-soiontific theory ts in its agrec- ont or othervieo with tho facts. . woronvor, naturel science 42 more fortunate than metorical in that its fucte con be established at sali by experiment. if the morgan thaory fits the facts then it ts correct, at lust wileds now contradictory foots are discovered. this {s true irroapeotive of whothor or not ito proponents cro idoeliste: the thoory itself stends tho matordalist test. lysenko's oxsor - if se can cal] it thot ~ lies in trying to erect seientitic theorica to fit on e pricri philosophical conception. in so doing his philocopty ie in reslity ioalist ~ for all thet he colis ft msatorislisn\" - zor the lewo ozo doduood from his mind ond nature addon to ft thom, bngols had o fitting reply te duhring vho attorpted e similar things \"ee wo doduce the world sohoustisn not from our minds, but only through our minds fron tho rool world, doducing the beste principles cf toing from vhst 1, ve need no philosmphy for this y but positive ieiowlodge of th> vorld \"and whot happons + and what this yielde 4s elso not philosophy, but positive sekonco.\" lyoonko's ecthod 4e not ucroly ideclict, but obscurontist, tho modiocyl sehoolmn obtained thuir mitural soiunes by studying the bible and the works of aristotle. any individus) such as rogor bneon or cupemicus vho studied naturap ond obtained rooults contra gicting those outhorities, wee pursued ond forbiddon to publish his works. in fussia today, volontists who doze to obtain rooulte contra gicting the st:lintst \"intorprotesions\" of mork and engels aro isble to by expellod and imprisonsd. ome class sirugole th ganotics\" ae wol2 a6 denouncing their theories, ysonkr attioka his npponunts os adoallsts, brurgoots recetionarius ond forcignors. 'the gonotios dispute 1s n faect of the elas struggle. npwo vorlde ~ tye adcologiva 4n biology\" 4 the sub-title of one of his chuptors.", | |
| "ow-toe 1948 it it fact, of course, thet the aojority of the world's sotontiots om fron capitalist cotntrios. \"wmy ore reactionary, many told doolist ond aystica2 views. up until nor, no-ano has thought of bttecking thady work on these eroumis. tho objective mrit of their work 9 tho criterion, mong marxists as asong all othor people with a soientific ontlosk. there euch views do effect the work ~ 0 in tho sooiel sciences, vhere the results doyend on selection of significant facts, oni' the conouption of \"significance\" vartes with tho investigntor's bleo ~ tho case is of course different. tt fe notorious tut, deopite their fase viows on philosophy, the greatest scientists of our day woro bourgote in outlook. thus, newton firmly boltoved in god yot his mechentes, by cnlarglng nants understanding of the universe, has netorially holped to undor- fine religion, if tyeenke hed boon' live perhaps be would have genounced newton's work se the produet of en idoslio? ven dn the social sofenoce scrupulous worker hes buon-lnown to, proluco roeults detwinontel to tho intoroste of bie own class. tho zeonondst ricardo wee one of tho movt copsblo and conseicus spokes hon of the onglish capitalist class. low did morx assove his? syooking of tho bourgvode thoozy thst von workors avo ddsplaced by muchinesy there 4o elvayo corresponding liberation of capitel to employ thom ogein, ho seyst noriginelly ricardo hold the cane opinion; but after e time, tith tho solontifie daportislity ond love of ttuth chorotertotic of tho oan, ho uxprosoly renounced it.\" (capital, vol i, chaptor 13, 500.6 'gootnote) tor wnould we forgot that irx row largely on the work of the pourgvota ricexdo ehon ho wrote \"capital. setentific objectivity ios pricoloss heritage, guincd ty copttalion see hs cboourantisa of the liiddlo agua, and, exeopt in fosctot jeon ioe capitalion hos not doctroyed 14, sootaliste must reoogpise cot eae whiu fect, not dony it ond bury it under dung-heon of slender. tho traly rovetlonary nature of lysonko'e attitule ppoors when be tee sa mas oppononts ae dourgoois or friends of foreigners, thus otto me sforsign ronotionary biology hostile to ube\" (pass 22)- matos (ia.3e38) ot 2 at eter ae 9 oor sa hint seivomane wo 0 common, morgen aeeeetfoas ni mendel vn austeion ond @ sani to boot!' the chotoees hower in this app-lling ttitude tw to be found ino statement {rstcd in tho memes per? mletsraturiala gidots\" (8.9.48)?", | |
| "cad nov-dec 1948 ve the undoroignod, mosbuxe of the collective fora \"tho road to sooialiom! (romcnsk rogion, | loser province) demand that tho tengore-on of bourgpeis seionbe, wis isckoye af the 2oredgaore ae erat eee italics hay bare 20 doe snoag tho selontiote of ou fotherian', \"thee hove thoy gion , tee feoplo tho so tovanoing with oure troad to conmntaa against those reactionary foreigners, plott tho bamnor of \"arate dor ond brod! \"prada\" ond tysonko bold marx, of courso, was russion 'usefulness as a scidnyivic crimrigh according to lysenikey hie uoofuino ond apposontly thet 18 eyough to condom tho fthoke zhebrakta inotitution for stpdying polypintdy, buoause inppenants! werk does ot {boa to results pf proction) 'thus he sitthough it hse for sone yoore dqne nothing bosides its work on elyplattyy (8) haw produocd literally nothing of prcotieol volun, 'tho papor \"bolshevik\" (15.6,48) dolivors itself of pogo 23; {eesgenerel otatoments \"la votunce hich doce not bolp productions 'hick joos not crm procthocl sorkurs, which doos not help soviet citizens to build a better lito, soteneo.\" 'aoe no right to call itoclt nme wot of thcory 40 practine.\" thot te marxist tonching, ond tr vee hiatol agionovs it moans oxporimontsl obsorvatiens 70 deotetvey f inpilier ond gunorelly socopte: {omdiste xoletion to tho oritor! thot \"pare 2 principle. but 1% boora no lon of uwsvfwlnose. tt is voll kann se ttpte iu seidon of ony denodicte practical value; wat see up ipproveed for tint ronson, information of gront ultinate 'usef| tree be lost. only in' tochnology can the oritericn of 3 bo applicd. and tocbnology itsolt woul tey tor tho \"para\" sodonce on whioh it io ba 'yo moagro woro hio'teon ooniusted in a optrit nf puro inguisktivencss of course, tho development of sofcnco iv dopondent on the weggoictys tho ono interacts\" upon tho other. it would ve entirely scostionsry to cay that the sofontiot can ait in an ivory tn the list ower, indifferent to tho sooiety in which ho lives dnelysie, all setonce serves the noods of society i and in that funse there 4s no \"puro\" coicnes", | |
| "wim, ~21- tor=deo 1948 once agein, iysonko!e idea 4s a perversion of marxtea, which cen only sorve to discredit miurxien ennng uerious poople. is lt in fact truo thet mondol-vorgen gonotics ere uecless? let lus fopoot, oven $f they wore it would not condemn thom if thoy correspond to the fucts. tutu gonotioiet of l.ryfey writing in the stalinist \"mode qulrterle\", autumn 1947, had the' following to eey: \"in my om viow this (iysenkole influence) mist have caused rious insses to the ussr. in north amoriea plant breeding avowodly based on gonetics hea tro cuocossea to its oredit = hybrid com ond rustaresistant whoat ~ which ore so striking 'that it hes teon seriously orguod thot thoy dia aru then ony othor discowry or invention tovards winning tho wor, plant breeding in the ussr cannot olain oucsosses af thio mngaiinde.\" inet, thon, te lysonko's practical value? it appease that he to @ vory copable practical farmer, and has boon roaponsiblo for many dots which have helpod to improve russion forming, though thoy do not depend at all on hic genctical thoorios. profeasor auhby saye 'thet \"when the much-advortised pro~troatuent of grain by low tom peratures, collod vornslisetion, proved a groat feilure, lysenko cleverly substituted anothor pro-troatacnt, which is virtuslly germination tost, but which appeared under his nome in the docroos for tho epring sowing in 1945 and 1946.\" (\"sci.itis im russia\" pogo 115) 'the pariy wy the purgs od in xtoing to tho top in tho russten gonotice] ophore? tho ansvor is simple: tohind lysonko and 'tonda tho russien commmist party; tohind thot stands hio theorics 'tho evd. \"he quirtion is asked in onc of tho notes handod to mo. what ie tho ottitade of the control conmittoo of the party to my roport? t onewor: the contra] commi ttoo ef tho party cxominod ay roport ond appreved it\", says tysonko. thus for tho english version. \"prayd\\\" 10.8.48 romitke that this ves grooted with frantic oppleuso ond in 'torninablo ovations, 11 rose und svore fidelity to tho grost cause of lonin-stelin. mae condition .. in the aeadony bog new anexniy chaneed. al to the ntorost tikes = +* ey eno forty, tho covornment, end", | |
| "262 nov-dee 2948 sve oait hersonally. a oonetdorehlo ' musber nf uichunia aoadoag ata ngit*eted botbers and corresponding aeabers eee aoadeny, ond wore will bo added shortly, et the coning ther tenr5, 0 (page 22 of lysenko'e report) fresotenoet tavita mie, 1930'8 & snollnsoee purge iad ccourzod. acadontotons shots yyand ardolow wore inprisoned. frofesvore agel ands soe faas ioa bros eroatent opponont, yavilovy whet tn spel enone gin with the task of sxgundsing russian sgricten thy and who won world feno ag 8 liclosie ald the vicga? 4% 1940, whore he dica in 1342.\" but atti tae 3 hold tho field. ho counesi of tho acadouy of sotenoes' of the geezer on august 25th, 1948. orboly, soaretesy of sed taseieett section, ts dheniosod. scheaihauson, minesee oe fe gacy ce sitormoloey, {8 dinnissos. the tatoratory at fy ology (ce of eninat and plant colla) is abolished, me bet he the donnaht, moloctoal section is reviood long micra ieee\" ana goinesl eloe sent @ lottor to stalin, adattting tie att ee sore agains acing, 0 occupy @ \"lending poestion in thevsteage moaning of the round quest ions of genotics. but solened, ',pasraoota prosudicos, by dotoetabio feiss or teangeits setonoe, ho has adopted the attitude of the enenyle nema ee (@uoted trom \"rm\", 2209647), toutd ecently, stalintots etroed could maintain # ori tical atti tute tomas lyeenko. | thus did fyfe, in the \"modem aasrerint a tes aneied (at te interosting thet in shat articis he refersed fo ate little songs\" erticls ge proof of the froedea of soviet seionet tttlo mowing he wes in the \"enony'e camp's.) \"so ten hes", | |
| ".55uteldane. but the britieh 0.p, to doxy by publishing clowing reviews. of lye a, jscumndngs! tata, tu dana has weit an ereisig in oh sotay worigh\" (1.12.46) oritiotning som of igaento's genatioel thos at oh #0 tactfully! ~ not yord about hie attocks on wtstieeize, on foreigners, mot 4 word aboct thu fiiloaophioel auetion me te urges. \"yo wittors haldane 4o on the spot end camot esenee soa tho dtlosts of his position. it ia pondor on the esmmnier at titor \"people have buon excommunicated for lesser hereelus' tan haltone'a. wap m035 i at seam? why, wo wey auke, dooo the stalinist govarnient take 'vo mush interest in thie question. 'the reasons oro probubly manifol4. iysonke is the practical mn, 'tho ponsant! denagoguo\", an anhby says. ho is supported aa tho fnen who rousos tho peauents from thoir slothy whose practice! gontut can zoro the raising of agriculture) production. if thie bo et the soot of destroying the edifice of russian yoneticu, that mnt bo ore. again, the stalinioto ore whipping up hastility to the west, not only ageinst capitalion, but a,ainst ell liberel idoes tet aight encourage critical spirit ani throeton tho talinist totaliterian reclu. ie 4 an rccidont that wontorn bolociate exo attacked not only a8 resctionarioe but a foroigure? under staliniua, objestive research into mstory and vooneatos 42 already iupossitic. 411 books dueling with the bintory of liessia sunt point trotsky, bukbarin, zinoviuy nnd many others ae eoboteure *f tho revolutiont' smyone whe dazed montlon thotr loading role in", | |
| "aay 0 wov-oo 1948 13 'the rovolution and the . early soviet stot would not spends day free, mor would an economist who submitted @ statistical analysio of the distribution of tho nitions] income botween groupe and classes in'russia, unloss he carefully obscured the truo position. yow piology joins' the list of \"controlled\" subjects. nature mst confora to the party's dictates: if 1t hoypens thet oho fails to, no-one must dae to montion tho fact, 'a rogino which doo thie deuonstretos its ataclutely reactionary wo governaent which fvars and suppresves science can stand tho tost of history. bocnonic successes may be achiowd by applying known techniques; technology may even mako bat vhon the treo devolopmont of soicnce 48 stozpod, 'progrons dries up. : y by wberating son from his class exploitation, frocs his 'spirit for the purcuit of truth ond toouty. such wes tho effect of 'the russien revolution, although 1 wos only a first stop to soctalian. by its supproseion af tho hunon spirit, together with) ate inforsal explottetion of the body, staliniss denon: izcte how far it is trex socialism, ant how it undoos the work of ooteber, 1917+ fuslished by bill gunter, for tho ravolutionmry commmiat party, (brotukyiet), 256 harrow rona, london, .2." | |
| ] |