diff --git "a/data/catechism_qa.jsonl" "b/data/catechism_qa.jsonl" --- "a/data/catechism_qa.jsonl" +++ "b/data/catechism_qa.jsonl" @@ -1,123 +1,123 @@ -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "1", "sort_key": 1, "question": "Who is the First and Chiefest Being?", "answer": "God is the First and Chiefest Being", "answer_with_proofs": "God is the First and Chiefest Being.[1]", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Isa.44.6", "osis": ["Isa.44.6"]}, {"raw": "Isa.48.12", "osis": ["Isa.48.12"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 21} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "2", "sort_key": 2, "question": "Ought every One to believe there is a God?", "answer": "Every One ought to believe there is a God; and it is their great Sin and Folly who do not.", "answer_with_proofs": "Every One ought to believe there is a God;[1] and it is their great Sin and Folly who do not.[2]", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.11.6", "osis": ["Heb.11.6"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.14.1", "osis": ["Ps.14.1"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 38} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "3", "sort_key": 3, "question": "How may we know there is a God?", "answer": "The Light of Nature in Man, and the Works of God plainly declare there is a God; but his Word and Spirit only, do it fully and effectually, for the Salvation of Sinners.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Light of Nature in Man, and the Works of God plainly declare there is a God;[1] but his Word and Spirit only, do it fully and effectually, for the Salvation of Sinners.[2]", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.1.19-Rom.1.20", "osis": ["Rom.1.19-Rom.1.20"]}, {"raw": "Ps.19.1-Ps.19.3", "osis": ["Ps.19.1-Ps.19.3"]}, {"raw": "Acts.17.24", "osis": ["Acts.17.24"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.2.10", "osis": ["1Cor.2.10"]}, {"raw": "2Tim.3.15-2Tim.3.16", "osis": ["2Tim.3.15-2Tim.3.16"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 53} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "4", "sort_key": 4, "question": "What is the Word of God?", "answer": "The Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are the Word of God, and the only certain Rule of Faith and Obedience.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are the Word of God, and the only certain Rule of Faith and Obedience.[1]", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "2Tim.3.16", "osis": ["2Tim.3.16"]}, {"raw": "Eph.2.20", "osis": ["Eph.2.20"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 39} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "5", "sort_key": 5, "question": "May all Men make use of the Holy Scriptures?", "answer": "All Men are not only permitted, but commanded and exhorted, to read, hear, and understand the Holy Scriptures.", "answer_with_proofs": "All Men are not only permitted, but commanded and exhorted, to read, hear, and understand the Holy Scriptures.[1]", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "John.5.39", "osis": ["John.5.39"]}, {"raw": "Deut.17.18-Deut.17.19", "osis": ["Deut.17.18-Deut.17.19"]}, {"raw": "Rev.1.3", "osis": ["Rev.1.3"]}, {"raw": "Acts.8.30", "osis": ["Acts.8.30"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 38} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "6", "sort_key": 6, "question": "What things are chiefly contained in the Holy Scriptures?", "answer": "The Holy Scriptures chiefly contain, what Man ought to believe concerning God, and what Duty God requireth of Man.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Holy Scriptures chiefly contain, what Man ought to believe concerning God, and what Duty God requireth of Man.[1]", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "2Tim.1.13", "osis": ["2Tim.1.13"]}, {"raw": "2Tim.3.15-2Tim.3.16", "osis": ["2Tim.3.15-2Tim.3.16"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 37} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "7", "sort_key": 7, "question": "What is God?", "answer": "God is a Spirit, Infinite, Eternal, and Unchangeable, in his Being, Wisdom, Power, Holiness, Justice, Goodness and Truth.", "answer_with_proofs": "God is a Spirit[1], Infinite[2], Eternal[3], and Unchangeable[4], in his Being[5], Wisdom[6], Power[7], Holiness[8], Justice, Goodness and Truth[9].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "John.4.24", "osis": ["John.4.24"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Job.11.7-Job.11.9", "osis": ["Job.11.7-Job.11.9"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.90.2", "osis": ["Ps.90.2"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Jas.1.17", "osis": ["Jas.1.17"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.3.14", "osis": ["Exod.3.14"]}]}, {"id": 6, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.147.5", "osis": ["Ps.147.5"]}]}, {"id": 7, "references": [{"raw": "Rev.4.8", "osis": ["Rev.4.8"]}]}, {"id": 8, "references": [{"raw": "Rev.15.4", "osis": ["Rev.15.4"]}]}, {"id": 9, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.34.6-Exod.34.7", "osis": ["Exod.34.6-Exod.34.7"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 40} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "8", "sort_key": 8, "question": "Are there more Gods than One?", "answer": "There is but One only, the Living and True God.", "answer_with_proofs": "There is but One only, the Living and True God[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Deut.6.4", "osis": ["Deut.6.4"]}, {"raw": "Jer.10.10", "osis": ["Jer.10.10"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 23} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "9", "sort_key": 9, "question": "How many Persons are there in the Godhead?", "answer": "There are Three Persons in the Godhead, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit; and these Three are One God, the same in Essence, equal in Power and Glory.", "answer_with_proofs": "There are Three Persons in the Godhead, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit; and these Three are One God, the same in Essence, equal in Power and Glory[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1John.5.7", "osis": ["1John.5.7"]}, {"raw": "Matt.28.19", "osis": ["Matt.28.19"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 52} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "10", "sort_key": 10, "question": "What are the Decrees of God?", "answer": "The Decrees of God are, his Eternal Purpose according to the Counsel of his Will, whereby, for his own Glory, he hath foreordained whatsoever comes to pass.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Decrees of God are, his Eternal Purpose according to the Counsel of his Will, whereby, for his own Glory, he hath foreordained whatsoever comes to pass[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.1.4,Eph.1.11", "osis": ["Eph.1.4", "Eph.1.11"]}, {"raw": "Rom.9.22-Rom.9.23", "osis": ["Rom.9.22-Rom.9.23"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 47} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "11", "sort_key": 11, "question": "How doth God execute his Decrees?", "answer": "God executeth his Decrees in the Works of Creation and Providence", "answer_with_proofs": "God executeth his Decrees in the Works of Creation and Providence", "proofs": [], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 26} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "12", "sort_key": 12, "question": "What is the Work of Creation?", "answer": "The Work of Creation , is God's making all Things of Nothing, by the Word of his Power, in the space of six Days, and all very Good.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Work of Creation , is God's making all Things of Nothing, by the Word of his Power, in the space of six Days, and all very Good[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.1", "osis": ["Gen.1"]}, {"raw": "Heb.11.3", "osis": ["Heb.11.3"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 44} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "13", "sort_key": 13, "question": "How did God create Man?", "answer": "God created Man, Male and Female, after his own Image, in Knowledge, Righteousness and Holiness, with Dominion over the Creatures.", "answer_with_proofs": "God created Man, Male and Female, after his own Image, in Knowledge, Righteousness and Holiness, with Dominion over the Creatures[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.1.26-Gen.1.28", "osis": ["Gen.1.26-Gen.1.28"]}, {"raw": "Col.3.10", "osis": ["Col.3.10"]}, {"raw": "Eph.4.24", "osis": ["Eph.4.24"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 39} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "14", "sort_key": 14, "question": "What are God's Works of Providence?", "answer": "God's Works of Providence, are his most Holy, Wise, and Powerful preserving, and governing all his Creatures, and all their Actions.", "answer_with_proofs": "God's Works of Providence, are his most Holy[1], Wise[2], and Powerful preserving[3], and governing all his Creatures, and all their Actions[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.145.17", "osis": ["Ps.145.17"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.104.24", "osis": ["Ps.104.24"]}, {"raw": "Isa.28.29", "osis": ["Isa.28.29"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.1.3", "osis": ["Heb.1.3"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.103.19", "osis": ["Ps.103.19"]}, {"raw": "Matt.10.29-Matt.10.31", "osis": ["Matt.10.29-Matt.10.31"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 40} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "15", "sort_key": 15, "question": "What special Act of Providence did God exercise towards Man in the Estate wherein he was created?", "answer": "When God had created Man, he entered into a Covenant of Life with him, upon Condition of perfect Obedience: forbidding him to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, upon pain of Death.", "answer_with_proofs": "When God had created Man, he entered into a Covenant of Life with him, upon Condition of perfect Obedience: forbidding him to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, upon pain of Death[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gal.3.12", "osis": ["Gal.3.12"]}, {"raw": "Gen.2.17", "osis": ["Gen.2.17"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 67} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "16", "sort_key": 16, "question": "Did our first Parents continue in the Estate wherein they were created?", "answer": "Our first Parents being left to the freedom of their own Will, fell from the Estate wherein they were created, by sinning against God.", "answer_with_proofs": "Our first Parents being left to the freedom of their own Will, fell from the Estate wherein they were created, by sinning against God[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.3.6-Gen.3.8,Gen.3.13", "osis": ["Gen.3.6-Gen.3.8", "Gen.3.13"]}, {"raw": "Eccl.7.29", "osis": ["Eccl.7.29"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 45} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "17", "sort_key": 17, "question": "What is Sin?", "answer": "Sin is any want of Conformity unto, or Transgression of the Law of God.", "answer_with_proofs": "Sin is any want of Conformity unto, or Transgression of the Law of God[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1John.3.4", "osis": ["1John.3.4"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 27} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "18", "sort_key": 18, "question": "What was the Sin whereby our first Parents fell from the Estate wherein they were created?", "answer": "The Sin whereby our first Parents fell from the Estate wherein they were created, was their eating the forbidden Fruit.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Sin whereby our first Parents fell from the Estate wherein they were created, was their eating the forbidden Fruit[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.3.6,Gen.3.12", "osis": ["Gen.3.6", "Gen.3.12"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 43} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "19", "sort_key": 19, "question": "Did all Mankind fall in Adam's first Transgression?", "answer": "The Covenant being made with Adam, not only for himself, but for his Posterity, all Mankind descending from him by ordinary Generation, sinned in him, and fell with him in his first Transgression.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Covenant being made with Adam, not only for himself, but for his Posterity, all Mankind descending from him by ordinary Generation, sinned in him, and fell with him in his first Transgression[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.2.16-Gen.2.17", "osis": ["Gen.2.16-Gen.2.17"]}, {"raw": "Rom.5.12", "osis": ["Rom.5.12"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.15.21-1Cor.15.22", "osis": ["1Cor.15.21-1Cor.15.22"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 59} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "20", "sort_key": 20, "question": "Into what Estate did the Fall bring Mankind?", "answer": "The Fall brought Mankind into an Estate of Sin and Misery.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Fall brought Mankind into an Estate of Sin and Misery[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.5.12", "osis": ["Rom.5.12"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 28} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "21", "sort_key": 21, "question": "Wherein consists the sinfulness of that Estate whereinto Man fell?", "answer": "The sinfulness of that Estate whereinto Man fell, consists in the Guilt of Adam's first Sin, the want of Original Righteousness, and the Corruption of his whole Nature, which is commonly called Original Sin; together with all actual Transgressions which proceed from it.", "answer_with_proofs": "The sinfulness of that Estate whereinto Man fell, consists in the Guilt of Adam's first Sin, the want of Original Righteousness, and the Corruption of his whole Nature, which is commonly called Original Sin; together with all actual Transgressions which proceed from it[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.5.12-Rom.5.21", "osis": ["Rom.5.12-Rom.5.21"]}, {"raw": "Eph.2.1-Eph.2.3", "osis": ["Eph.2.1-Eph.2.3"]}, {"raw": "Jas.1.14-Jas.1.15", "osis": ["Jas.1.14-Jas.1.15"]}, {"raw": "Matt.15.19", "osis": ["Matt.15.19"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 75} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "22", "sort_key": 22, "question": "What is the Misery of that Estate whereinto Man fell?", "answer": "All Mankind by their Fall lost Communion with God, are under his Wrath and Curse; and so make liable to all Miseries in this Life, to Death it self, and to the Pains of Hell for ever.", "answer_with_proofs": "All Mankind by their Fall lost Communion with God[1], are under his Wrath and Curse[2]; and so make liable to all Miseries in this Life, to Death it self, and to the Pains of Hell for ever[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.3.8,Gen.3.10,Gen.3.24", "osis": ["Gen.3.8", "Gen.3.10", "Gen.3.24"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.2.2-Eph.2.3", "osis": ["Eph.2.2-Eph.2.3"]}, {"raw": "Gal.3.10", "osis": ["Gal.3.10"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Lam.3.39", "osis": ["Lam.3.39"]}, {"raw": "Rom.6.23", "osis": ["Rom.6.23"]}, {"raw": "Matt.25.41-Matt.25.46", "osis": ["Matt.25.41-Matt.25.46"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 63} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "23", "sort_key": 23, "question": "Did God leave all Mankind to perish in the Estate of Sin and Misery?", "answer": "God, having out of his meer good pleasure, from all Eternity, elected some to Everlasting Life, did enter into a Covenant of Grace, to deliver them out of the Estate of Sin and Misery, and to bring them into an Estate of Salvation by a Redeemer.", "answer_with_proofs": "God, having out of his meer good pleasure, from all Eternity, elected some to Everlasting Life[1], did enter into a Covenant of Grace, to deliver them out of the Estate of Sin and Misery, and to bring them into an Estate of Salvation by a Redeemer[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.1.4-Eph.1.5", "osis": ["Eph.1.4-Eph.1.5"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.3.20-Rom.3.22", "osis": ["Rom.3.20-Rom.3.22"]}, {"raw": "Gal.3.21-Gal.3.22", "osis": ["Gal.3.21-Gal.3.22"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 79} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "24", "sort_key": 24, "question": "Who is the Redeemer of God's Elect?", "answer": "The only Redeemer of God's Elect, is the Lord Jesus Christ; who being the Eternal Son of God, became Man, and so was; and continueth to be God and Man, in two distinct Natures, and one Person for ever.", "answer_with_proofs": "The only Redeemer of God's Elect, is the Lord Jesus Christ[1]; who being the Eternal Son of God, became Man[2], and so was; and continueth to be God and Man, in two distinct Natures, and one Person for ever[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Tim.2.5-1Tim.2.6", "osis": ["1Tim.2.5-1Tim.2.6"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "John.1.14", "osis": ["John.1.14"]}, {"raw": "Gal.4.4", "osis": ["Gal.4.4"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.9.5,Luke.1.23", "osis": ["Rom.9.5", "Luke.1.23"]}, {"raw": "Col.2.9", "osis": ["Col.2.9"]}, {"raw": "Heb.7.24-Heb.7.25", "osis": ["Heb.7.24-Heb.7.25"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 65} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "25", "sort_key": 25, "question": "How did Christ, being the Son of God, become Man?", "answer": "Christ the Son of God became Man, by taking to himself a true Body, and a reasonable Soul; being conceived by the Power of the Holy Spirit in the Womb of the Virgin Mary, and born of her, yet without Sin.", "answer_with_proofs": "Christ the Son of God became Man, by taking to himself a true Body[1], and a reasonable Soul[2]; being conceived by the Power of the Holy Spirit in the Womb of the Virgin Mary, and born of her[3], yet without Sin[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.2.14,Heb.2.16,Heb.10.5", "osis": ["Heb.2.14", "Heb.2.16", "Heb.10.5"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.26.38", "osis": ["Matt.26.38"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.1.27,Luke.1.31,Luke.1.34-Luke.1.35,Luke.1.42", "osis": ["Luke.1.27", "Luke.1.31", "Luke.1.34-Luke.1.35", "Luke.1.42"]}, {"raw": "Gal.4.4", "osis": ["Gal.4.4"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.4.15,Heb.7.26", "osis": ["Heb.4.15", "Heb.7.26"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 65} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "26", "sort_key": 26, "question": "What Offices doth Christ execute as our Redeemer?", "answer": "Christ as our Redeemer executeth the Offices of a Prophet, of a Priest, and of a King, both in his Estate of Humiliation and Exaltation.", "answer_with_proofs": "Christ as our Redeemer executeth the Offices of a Prophet, of a Priest, and of a King, both in his Estate of Humiliation and Exaltation[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.3.22", "osis": ["Acts.3.22"]}, {"raw": "Heb.12.25,2Cor.13.3", "osis": ["Heb.12.25", "2Cor.13.3"]}, {"raw": "Heb.5.5-Heb.5.7,Heb.7.25", "osis": ["Heb.5.5-Heb.5.7", "Heb.7.25"]}, {"raw": "Ps.2.6", "osis": ["Ps.2.6"]}, {"raw": "Isa.9.6-Isa.9.7", "osis": ["Isa.9.6-Isa.9.7"]}, {"raw": "Matt.21.5", "osis": ["Matt.21.5"]}, {"raw": "Ps.2.8-Ps.2.11", "osis": ["Ps.2.8-Ps.2.11"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 49} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "27", "sort_key": 27, "question": "How doth Christ execute the Office of a Prophet?", "answer": "Christ executeth the Office of a Prophet, in revealing to us, by his Word and Spirit, the Will of God for our Salvation.", "answer_with_proofs": "Christ executeth the Office of a Prophet, in revealing to us, by his Word and Spirit, the Will of God for our Salvation[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "John.1.18", "osis": ["John.1.18"]}, {"raw": "1Pet.1.10-1Pet.1.12", "osis": ["1Pet.1.10-1Pet.1.12"]}, {"raw": "John.15.15,John.20.31", "osis": ["John.15.15", "John.20.31"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 43} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "28", "sort_key": 28, "question": "How doth Christ execute the Office of a Priest?", "answer": "Christ executeth the Office of a Priest, in his once offering up of himself a Sacrifice to satisfy Divine Justice, and reconcile us to God, and in making continual Intercession for us.", "answer_with_proofs": "Christ executeth the Office of a Priest, in his once offering up of himself a Sacrifice to satisfy Divine Justice[1], and reconcile us to God[2], and in making continual Intercession for us[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.9.14,Heb.9.28", "osis": ["Heb.9.14", "Heb.9.28"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.2.17", "osis": ["Heb.2.17"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.7.24-Heb.7.25", "osis": ["Heb.7.24-Heb.7.25"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 54} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "29", "sort_key": 29, "question": "How doth Christ execute the Office of a King?", "answer": "Christ executeth the Office of a King, in subduing us to himself, in ruling, and defending us, and in restraining and conquering all his and our Enemies.", "answer_with_proofs": "Christ executeth the Office of a King, in subduing us to himself[1], in ruling[2], and defending us[3], and in restraining and conquering all his and our Enemies[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.15.14-Acts.15.16", "osis": ["Acts.15.14-Acts.15.16"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Isa.33.22", "osis": ["Isa.33.22"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Isa.32.1-Isa.32.2", "osis": ["Isa.32.1-Isa.32.2"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.15.25", "osis": ["1Cor.15.25"]}, {"raw": "Ps.110", "osis": ["Ps.110"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 51} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "30", "sort_key": 30, "question": "Wherein did Christ's Humiliation consist?", "answer": "Christ's Humiliation consisted in his being born, and that in a low Condition; made under the Law, undergoing the Miseries of this Life, the Wrath of God, and the cursed Death of the Cross; in being buried, and continuing under the Power of Death for a time. Mat. 12:40.", "answer_with_proofs": "Christ's Humiliation consisted in his being born, and that in a low Condition[1]; made under the Law[2], undergoing the Miseries of this Life[3], the Wrath of God[4], and the cursed Death of the Cross[5]; in being buried[6], and continuing under the Power of Death for a time[7]. Mat. 12:40.", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.2.7", "osis": ["Luke.2.7"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Gal.4.4", "osis": ["Gal.4.4"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.12.2-Heb.12.3", "osis": ["Heb.12.2-Heb.12.3"]}, {"raw": "Isa.53.2-Isa.53.3", "osis": ["Isa.53.2-Isa.53.3"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.22.44", "osis": ["Luke.22.44"]}, {"raw": "Matt.27.46", "osis": ["Matt.27.46"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "Phil.2.8", "osis": ["Phil.2.8"]}]}, {"id": 6, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.15.4", "osis": ["1Cor.15.4"]}]}, {"id": 7, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.2.24-Acts.2.27,Acts.2.31", "osis": ["Acts.2.24-Acts.2.27", "Acts.2.31"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 78} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "31", "sort_key": 31, "question": "Wherein consisteth Christ's Exaltation?", "answer": "Christ's Exaltation consisteth in his rising again from the Dead on the third Day, in ascending up into Heaven, in sitting at the right Hand of God the Father, and in coming to judg the World at the last Day.", "answer_with_proofs": "Christ's Exaltation consisteth in his rising again from the Dead on the third Day[1], in ascending up into Heaven[2], in sitting at the right Hand of God the Father[3], and in coming to judg the World at the last Day[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.15.4", "osis": ["1Cor.15.4"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Mark.16.19", "osis": ["Mark.16.19"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.1.20", "osis": ["Eph.1.20"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.1.11,Acts.17.31", "osis": ["Acts.1.11", "Acts.17.31"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 63} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "32", "sort_key": 32, "question": "How are we made Partakers of the Redemption purchased by Christ?", "answer": "We are made Partakers of the Redemption purchased by Christ, by the effectual Application of it to us by his Holy Spirit.", "answer_with_proofs": "We are made Partakers of the Redemption purchased by Christ, by the effectual Application of it to us[1] by his Holy Spirit[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "John.1.11-John.1.12", "osis": ["John.1.11-John.1.12"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Titus.3.5-Titus.3.6", "osis": ["Titus.3.5-Titus.3.6"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 43} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "33", "sort_key": 33, "question": "How doth the Spirit apply to us the Redemption purchased by Christ?", "answer": "The Spirit applieth to us the Redemption purchased by Chrift, by working Faith in us, and thereby uniting us to Christ, in our effectual Calling.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Spirit applieth to us the Redemption purchased by Chrift, by working Faith in us[1], and thereby uniting us to Christ, in our effectual Calling[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.1.13-Eph.1.14", "osis": ["Eph.1.13-Eph.1.14"]}, {"raw": "John.6.37,John.6.39", "osis": ["John.6.37", "John.6.39"]}, {"raw": "Eph.2.8", "osis": ["Eph.2.8"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.3.17", "osis": ["Eph.3.17"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.1.9", "osis": ["1Cor.1.9"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 52} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "34", "sort_key": 34, "question": "What is effectual Calling?", "answer": "Effectual Calling, is the Work of God's Spirit, whereby, convincing us of our Sin and Misery, enlightening our Minds in the knowledge of Christ, and renewing our Wills, he doth persuade and enable us to embrace Jesus Christ freely offered to us in the Gospel.", "answer_with_proofs": "Effectual Calling, is the Work of God's Spirit[1], whereby, convincing us of our Sin and Misery[2], enlightening our Minds in the knowledge of Christ[3], and renewing our Wills[4], he doth persuade and enable us to embrace Jesus Christ freely offered to us in the Gospel[5].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "2Tim.1.9", "osis": ["2Tim.1.9"]}, {"raw": "2Thess.2.13-2Thess.2.14", "osis": ["2Thess.2.13-2Thess.2.14"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.2.37", "osis": ["Acts.2.37"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.26.18", "osis": ["Acts.26.18"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Ezek.36.26-Ezek.36.27", "osis": ["Ezek.36.26-Ezek.36.27"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "John.6.44-John.6.45", "osis": ["John.6.44-John.6.45"]}, {"raw": "Phil.2.13", "osis": ["Phil.2.13"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 69} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "35", "sort_key": 35, "question": "What Benefits do they that are effectually called, partake of in this Life?", "answer": "They that are effectually called, do in this Life partake of Justification, Adoption, Sanctification, and the several Benefits which in this Life do either accompany or flow from them.", "answer_with_proofs": "They that are effectually called, do in this Life partake of Justification[1], Adoption[2], Sanctification, and the several Benefits which in this Life do either accompany or flow from them[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.8.30", "osis": ["Rom.8.30"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.1.5", "osis": ["Eph.1.5"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.1.30", "osis": ["1Cor.1.30"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 59} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "36", "sort_key": 36, "question": "What is Justification?", "answer": "Justification is an Act of God's free Grace, wherein he pardoneth all our Sins, and accepteth us as Righteous in his sight, only for the Righteousness of Christ imputed us, and received by Faith alone.", "answer_with_proofs": "Justification is an Act of God's free Grace, wherein he pardoneth all our Sins[1], and accepteth us as Righteous in his sight[2], only for the Righteousness of Christ imputed us[3], and received by Faith alone[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.3.24-Rom.3.25", "osis": ["Rom.3.24-Rom.3.25"]}, {"raw": "Rom.4.6-Rom.4.8", "osis": ["Rom.4.6-Rom.4.8"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "2Cor.5.19,2Cor.5.21", "osis": ["2Cor.5.19", "2Cor.5.21"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.5.17-Rom.5.19", "osis": ["Rom.5.17-Rom.5.19"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Gal.2.16", "osis": ["Gal.2.16"]}, {"raw": "Phil.3.9", "osis": ["Phil.3.9"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 58} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "37", "sort_key": 37, "question": "What is Adoption?", "answer": "Adoption is an Act of God's free Grace, whereby we are received into the Number, and have a Right to all the Privileges of the Sons of God.", "answer_with_proofs": "Adoption is an Act of God's free Grace[1], whereby we are received into the Number, and have a Right to all the Privileges of the Sons of God[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1John.3.1", "osis": ["1John.3.1"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.8.14", "osis": ["Rom.8.14"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 41} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "38", "sort_key": 38, "question": "What is Sanctification?", "answer": "Sanctification is the Work of God's free Grace, whereby we are renewed in the whole Man after the Image of God, and are enabled more and more to die unto Sin, and live unto Righteousness.", "answer_with_proofs": "Sanctification is the Work of God's free Grace[1], whereby we are renewed in the whole Man after the Image of God[2], and are enabled more and more to die unto Sin, and live unto Righteousness[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "2Thess.2.13", "osis": ["2Thess.2.13"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.4.23-Eph.4.24", "osis": ["Eph.4.23-Eph.4.24"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.6.4,Rom.6.6", "osis": ["Rom.6.4", "Rom.6.6"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 52} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "39", "sort_key": 39, "question": "What are the Benefits which in this Life do accompany or flow from Justification, Adoption, and Sanctification?", "answer": "The Benefits which in this Life do accompany or flow from Justification, Adoption, and Sanctification, are Assurance of God's Love, Peace of Conscience, Joy in the Holy Spirit, Increase of Grace, and Perseverance therein to the End.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Benefits which in this Life do accompany or flow from Justification, Adoption, and Sanctification, are Assurance of God's Love, Peace of Conscience[1], Joy in the Holy Spirit[2], Increase of Grace[3], and Perseverance therein to the End[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.5.1-Rom.5.2,Rom.5.5", "osis": ["Rom.5.1-Rom.5.2", "Rom.5.5"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.14.17", "osis": ["Rom.14.17"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Prov.4.18", "osis": ["Prov.4.18"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "1John.5.13", "osis": ["1John.5.13"]}, {"raw": "1Pet.1.5", "osis": ["1Pet.1.5"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 78} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "40", "sort_key": 40, "question": "What Benefits do Believers receive from Christ at their Death?", "answer": "The Souls of Believers are at their Death made, perfect in Holiness, and do immediately pass into Glory: And their Bodies being still united to Christ, do rest in their Graves till the Refurrection.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Souls of Believers are at their Death made, perfect in Holiness[1], and do immediately pass into Glory[2]: And their Bodies being still united to Christ[3], do rest in their Graves[4] till the Resurrection[5].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.12.23", "osis": ["Heb.12.23"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "2Cor.5.1,2Cor.5.6,2Cor.5.8", "osis": ["2Cor.5.1", "2Cor.5.6", "2Cor.5.8"]}, {"raw": "Phil.1.23", "osis": ["Phil.1.23"]}, {"raw": "Luke.23.43", "osis": ["Luke.23.43"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "1Thess.4.14", "osis": ["1Thess.4.14"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Isa.57.2", "osis": ["Isa.57.2"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "Job.19.26-Job.19.27", "osis": ["Job.19.26-Job.19.27"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 60} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "41", "sort_key": 41, "question": "What Benefits do Believers receive from Christ at the Resurrection?", "answer": "At the Resurrection Believers being raised up in Glory, shall be openly acknowledged, and acquitted in the Day of Judgement, and made perfectly blessed, both in Soul and Body, in the full enjoyment of God, to all Eternity.", "answer_with_proofs": "At the Resurrection Believers being raised up in Glory[1], shall be openly acknowledged, and acquitted in the Day of Judgement[2], and made perfectly blessed, both in Soul and Body, in the full enjoyment of God[3], to all Eternity[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.15.43", "osis": ["1Cor.15.43"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.25.23", "osis": ["Matt.25.23"]}, {"raw": "Matt.10.32", "osis": ["Matt.10.32"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "1John.3.2", "osis": ["1John.3.2"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.13.12", "osis": ["1Cor.13.12"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "1Thess.4.17-1Thess.4.18", "osis": ["1Thess.4.17-1Thess.4.18"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 69} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "42", "sort_key": 42, "question": "But what shall be done to the Wicked at their Death?", "answer": "The Souls of the Wicked shall at their death be cast into the Torments of Hell, and their Bodies lie in their Graves, till the Refurrection and Judgment of the Great Day.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Souls of the Wicked shall at their death be cast into the Torments of Hell, and their Bodies lie in their Graves, till the Refurrection and Judgment of the Great Day[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.16.23-Luke.16.24", "osis": ["Luke.16.23-Luke.16.24"]}, {"raw": "Acts.1.25", "osis": ["Acts.1.25"]}, {"raw": "Jude.1.7", "osis": ["Jude.1.7"]}, {"raw": "1Pet.3.19", "osis": ["1Pet.3.19"]}, {"raw": "Ps.49.14", "osis": ["Ps.49.14"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 55} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "43", "sort_key": 43, "question": "What shall be done to the Wicked at the Day of Judgment?", "answer": "At the Day of Judgment the Bodies of the Wicked being raised out of their Graves, shall be sentenced together with their Souls, to unspeakable Torments, with the Devil and his Angels for ever.", "answer_with_proofs": "At the Day of Judgment the Bodies of the Wicked being raised out of their Graves, shall be sentenced together with their Souls, to unspeakable Torments, with the Devil and his Angels for ever[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "John.5.28-John.5.29", "osis": ["John.5.28-John.5.29"]}, {"raw": "Matt.25.41,Matt.25.46", "osis": ["Matt.25.41", "Matt.25.46"]}, {"raw": "2Thess.1.8-2Thess.1.9", "osis": ["2Thess.1.8-2Thess.1.9"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 19} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "44", "sort_key": 44, "question": "What is the Duty which God requireth of Man?", "answer": "The Duty which God requireth of Man, is Obedience to his Revealed Will.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Duty which God requireth of Man, is Obedience to his Revealed Will[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Mic.6.8", "osis": ["Mic.6.8"]}, {"raw": "1Sam.15.22", "osis": ["1Sam.15.22"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 34} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "45", "sort_key": 45, "question": "What did God at first reveal to Man for the Rule of his Obedience?", "answer": "The Rule which God at first revealed to Man for his Obedience, was the Moral Law.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Rule which God at first revealed to Man for his Obedience, was the Moral Law[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.2.14-Rom.2.15", "osis": ["Rom.2.14-Rom.2.15"]}, {"raw": "Rom.10.5", "osis": ["Rom.10.5"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 41} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "46", "sort_key": 46, "question": "Where is the Moral Law summarily comprehended?", "answer": "The Moral Law is summarily comprehended in the Ten Commandments.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Moral Law is summarily comprehended in the Ten Commandments[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Deut.10.4", "osis": ["Deut.10.4"]}, {"raw": "Matt.19.17", "osis": ["Matt.19.17"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 28} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "47", "sort_key": 47, "question": "What is the Sum of the Ten Commandments?", "answer": "The Sum of the Ten Commandments is, to love the Lord our God, with all our Heart, with all our Soul, with all our Strength, and with all our Mind; and our Neighbour as our Selves.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Sum of the Ten Commandments is, to love the Lord our God, with all our Heart, with all our Soul, with all our Strength, and with all our Mind; and our Neighbour as our Selves[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.22.37-Matt.22.40", "osis": ["Matt.22.37-Matt.22.40"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 60} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "48", "sort_key": 48, "question": "What is the Preface to the Ten Commandments?", "answer": "The Preface to the Ten Commandments, is in these words, \"I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the Land of Egypt, out of the House of Bondage\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The Preface to the Ten Commandments, is in these words, \"I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the Land of Egypt, out of the House of Bondage\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.2", "osis": ["Exod.20.2"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 56} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "49", "sort_key": 49, "question": "What doth the Preface to the Ten Commandments teach us?", "answer": "The Preface to the Ten Commandments teacheth us, that because God is the LORD, and our God, and Redeemer, therefore we are bound to keep all his Commandments.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Preface to the Ten Commandments teacheth us, that because God is the LORD, and our God, and Redeemer, therefore we are bound to keep all his Commandments[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.1.74-Luke.1.75", "osis": ["Luke.1.74-Luke.1.75"]}, {"raw": "1Pet.1.15-1Pet.1.19", "osis": ["1Pet.1.15-1Pet.1.19"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 56} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "50", "sort_key": 50, "question": "Which is the first Commandment?", "answer": "The first Commandment is, \"Thou shalt have no other Gods before me\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The first Commandment is, \"Thou shalt have no other Gods before me\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.3", "osis": ["Exod.20.3"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 28} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "51", "sort_key": 51, "question": "What is required in the first Commandment?", "answer": "The first Commandment requireth us, to know and acknowledge God to be the only true God, and our God; and to worship and glorify him accordingly.", "answer_with_proofs": "The first Commandment requireth us, to know and acknowledge God to be the only true God, and our God[1]; and to worship and glorify him accordingly[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Chr.28.9", "osis": ["1Chr.28.9"]}, {"raw": "Deut.26.17", "osis": ["Deut.26.17"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.4.10", "osis": ["Matt.4.10"]}, {"raw": "Ps.29.2", "osis": ["Ps.29.2"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 46} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "52", "sort_key": 52, "question": "What is forbidden in the first Commandment?", "answer": "The first Commandment forbiddeth the denying, or not worshipping and glorifying the true God, as God, and our God; and the giving that Worship and Glory to any other, which is due unto him a alone.", "answer_with_proofs": "The first Commandment forbiddeth the denying[1], or not worshipping and glorifying the true God, as God[2], and our God[3]; and the giving that Worship and Glory to any other, which is due unto him alone[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.14.1", "osis": ["Ps.14.1"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.1.21", "osis": ["Rom.1.21"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.81.10-Ps.81.11", "osis": ["Ps.81.10-Ps.81.11"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.1.25-Rom.1.26", "osis": ["Rom.1.25-Rom.1.26"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 60} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "53", "sort_key": 53, "question": "What are we specially taught by these words \"before me\" in the first Commandment?", "answer": "These words \"before me\" in the first Commandment, teach us, that God who seeth all things, taketh notice of, and is much displeased with the Sin of having any other God.", "answer_with_proofs": "These words \"before me\" in the first Commandment, teach us, that God who seeth all things, taketh notice of, and is much displeased with the Sin of having any other God[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Ezek.8.5-Ezek.8.18", "osis": ["Ezek.8.5-Ezek.8.18"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 64} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "54", "sort_key": 54, "question": "Which is the second Commandment?", "answer": "The second Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven Image, or any Likeness of any thing that is in Heaven above, or that is in the Earth beneath, or that is in the Water under the Earth; thou shalt not bow down thy self to them, nor serve them: For I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the Iniquity of the Fathers upon the Children, unto the Third and Fourth Generation of them that hate me; and shewing Mercy unto Thousands of them that love me and keep my Commandments.", "answer_with_proofs": "The second Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven Image, or any Likeness of any thing that is in Heaven above, or that is in the Earth beneath, or that is in the Water under the Earth; thou shalt not bow down thy self to them, nor serve them: For I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the Iniquity of the Fathers upon the Children, unto the Third and Fourth Generation of them that hate me; and shewing Mercy unto Thousands of them that love me and keep my Commandments[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.4-Exod.20.6", "osis": ["Exod.20.4-Exod.20.6"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 127} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "55", "sort_key": 55, "question": "What is required in the second Commandment?", "answer": "The second Commandment requireth, the receiving, observing, and keeping pure and entire all such religious Worship and Ordinances, as God hath appointed in his Word.", "answer_with_proofs": "The second Commandment requireth, the receiving, observing, and keeping pure and entire all such religious Worship and Ordinances, as God hath appointed in his Word[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Deut.32.46", "osis": ["Deut.32.46"]}, {"raw": "Matt.28.20", "osis": ["Matt.28.20"]}, {"raw": "Acts.2.42", "osis": ["Acts.2.42"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 47} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "56", "sort_key": 56, "question": "What is forbidden in the second Commandment?", "answer": "The second Commandment forbiddeth the worshipping of God by Images, or any other Way not appointed in his Word.", "answer_with_proofs": "The second Commandment forbiddeth the worshipping of God by Images[1], or any other Way not appointed in his Word[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Deut.4.15-Deut.4.19", "osis": ["Deut.4.15-Deut.4.19"]}, {"raw": "Exod.32.5,Exod.32.8", "osis": ["Exod.32.5", "Exod.32.8"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Deut.12.31-Deut.12.32", "osis": ["Deut.12.31-Deut.12.32"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 38} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "57", "sort_key": 57, "question": "What are the Reasons annexed to the second Commandment?", "answer": "The Reasons annexed to the second Commandment are, God's Sovereignty over us, his Propriety in us, and the Zeal he hath to his own Worship.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Reasons annexed to the second Commandment are, God's Sovereignty over us[1], his Propriety in us[2], and the Zeal he hath to his own Worship[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.95.2-Ps.95.3,Ps.95.6", "osis": ["Ps.95.2-Ps.95.3", "Ps.95.6"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.45.11", "osis": ["Ps.45.11"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.34.13-Exod.34.14", "osis": ["Exod.34.13-Exod.34.14"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 52} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "58", "sort_key": 58, "question": "Which is the third Commandment?", "answer": "The third Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain, For the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his Name in vain\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The third Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain, For the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his Name in vain\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.7", "osis": ["Exod.20.7"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 50} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "59", "sort_key": 59, "question": "What is required in the third Commandment?", "answer": "The third Commandment requireth, the Holy and Reverent Use of God's Names, Titles, Attributes, Ordinances, Word, and Works.", "answer_with_proofs": "The third Commandment requireth, the Holy and Reverent Use of God's Names[1], Titles[2], Attributes[3], Ordinances[4], Word[5], and Works[6].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.9", "osis": ["Matt.6.9"]}, {"raw": "Deut.28.58", "osis": ["Deut.28.58"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.68.4", "osis": ["Ps.68.4"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Rev.15.3-Rev.15.4", "osis": ["Rev.15.3-Rev.15.4"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Mal.1.11,Mal.1.14", "osis": ["Mal.1.11", "Mal.1.14"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.138.1-Ps.138.2", "osis": ["Ps.138.1-Ps.138.2"]}]}, {"id": 6, "references": [{"raw": "Job.36.24", "osis": ["Job.36.24"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 14} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "60", "sort_key": 60, "question": "What is forbidden in the third Commandment?", "answer": "The third Commandment forbiddeth all profaning and abusing of any thing, whereby God makes himself known.", "answer_with_proofs": "The third Commandment forbiddeth all profaning and abusing of any thing, whereby God makes himself known[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Mal.1.6-Mal.1.7,Mal.1.12", "osis": ["Mal.1.6-Mal.1.7", "Mal.1.12"]}, {"raw": "Mal.2.2", "osis": ["Mal.2.2"]}, {"raw": "Mal.3.14", "osis": ["Mal.3.14"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 14} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "61", "sort_key": 61, "question": "What is the Reason annexed to the third Commandment?", "answer": "The Reason annexed to the third Commandment, is, that however the breakers of this Commandment may escape Punishment from Men, yet the Lord our God will not suffer them to escape his Righteous Judgment.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Reason annexed to the third Commandment, is, that however the breakers of this Commandment may escape Punishment from Men, yet the Lord our God will not suffer them to escape his Righteous Judgment[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Sam.2.12,1Sam.2.17,1Sam.2.22,1Sam.2.24,1Sam.2.29", "osis": ["1Sam.2.12", "1Sam.2.17", "1Sam.2.22", "1Sam.2.24", "1Sam.2.29"]}, {"raw": "1Sam.3.13", "osis": ["1Sam.3.13"]}, {"raw": "Deut.28.58-Deut.28.59", "osis": ["Deut.28.58-Deut.28.59"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 60} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "62", "sort_key": 62, "question": "Which is the fourth Commandment?", "answer": "The fourth Commandment is, \"Remember the Sabbath Day to keep it holy: Six Days shalt thou labour, and do all thy Work; but the Seventh Day is the Sabbath of the LORD thy God, in it thou shalt not do any Work, thou, nor thy Son, nor thy Daughter, thy Man-servant, nov thy Maid-servant, nor thy Cattel, nor the Stranger that is within thy Gates: For in six Days the LORD made Heaven and Earth, the Sea, and all that in them is, and rested the Seventh Day; wherefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath Day, and hallowed it\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The fourth Commandment is, \"Remember the Sabbath Day to keep it holy: Six Days shalt thou labour, and do all thy Work; but the Seventh Day is the Sabbath of the LORD thy God, in it thou shalt not do any Work, thou, nor thy Son, nor thy Daughter, thy Man-servant, nov thy Maid-servant, nor thy Cattel, nor the Stranger that is within thy Gates: For in six Days the LORD made Heaven and Earth, the Sea, and all that in them is, and rested the Seventh Day; wherefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath Day, and hallowed it\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.8-Exod.20.11", "osis": ["Exod.20.8-Exod.20.11"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 140} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "63", "sort_key": 63, "question": "What is required in the fourth Commandment?", "answer": "The fourth Commandment requireth, the keeping Holy to God one whole Day in Seven, to be a Sabbath to himself", "answer_with_proofs": "The fourth Commandment requireth, the keeping Holy to God one whole Day in Seven, to be a Sabbath to himself[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.8-Exod.20.11", "osis": ["Exod.20.8-Exod.20.11"]}, {"raw": "Deut.5.12-Deut.5.14", "osis": ["Deut.5.12-Deut.5.14"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 37} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "64", "sort_key": 64, "question": "Which Day of the Seven hath God appointed to be the Weekly Sabbath?", "answer": "Before the Refurrection of Christ, God appointed the Seventh Day of the Week to be the Weekly Sabbath, and the First Day of the Week ever since, to continue to the End of the World, which is the Christian Sabbath.", "answer_with_proofs": "Before the Refurrection of Christ, God appointed the Seventh Day of the Week to be the Weekly Sabbath[1], and the First Day of the Week ever since, to continue to the End of the World, which is the Christian Sabbath[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.8-Exod.20.11", "osis": ["Exod.20.8-Exod.20.11"]}, {"raw": "Deut.5.12-Deut.5.14", "osis": ["Deut.5.12-Deut.5.14"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.118.24", "osis": ["Ps.118.24"]}, {"raw": "Matt.28.1", "osis": ["Matt.28.1"]}, {"raw": "Mark.2.27-Mark.2.28", "osis": ["Mark.2.27-Mark.2.28"]}, {"raw": "Mark.16.2", "osis": ["Mark.16.2"]}, {"raw": "Luke.24.1,Luke.24.30-Luke.24.36", "osis": ["Luke.24.1", "Luke.24.30-Luke.24.36"]}, {"raw": "John.20.1,John.20.19-John.20.21,John.20.26", "osis": ["John.20.1", "John.20.19-John.20.21", "John.20.26"]}, {"raw": "Acts.1.3", "osis": ["Acts.1.3"]}, {"raw": "Acts.2.1-Acts.2.2", "osis": ["Acts.2.1-Acts.2.2"]}, {"raw": "Acts.20.7", "osis": ["Acts.20.7"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.16.1-1Cor.16.2", "osis": ["1Cor.16.1-1Cor.16.2"]}, {"raw": "Rev.1.10", "osis": ["Rev.1.10"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 64} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "65", "sort_key": 65, "question": "How is the Sabbath to be sanctified?", "answer": "The Sabbath is to be sanctified by a holy Resting all that Day, even from such worldly Employments and Recreations as are lawful on other Days; and spending the whole Time in the Public and Private Exercises of God's Worship, except so much as is to be taken up in the Works of Necessity and Mercy.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Sabbath is to be sanctified by a holy Resting all that Day[1], even from such worldly Employments and Recreations as are lawful on other Days[2]; and spending the whole Time in the Public and Private Exercises of God's Worship[3], except so much as is to be taken up in the Works of Necessity and Mercy[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.8,Exod.20.10", "osis": ["Exod.20.8", "Exod.20.10"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.16.25-Exod.16.28", "osis": ["Exod.16.25-Exod.16.28"]}, {"raw": "Neh.13.15-Neh.13.19,Neh.13.21-Neh.13.22", "osis": ["Neh.13.15-Neh.13.19", "Neh.13.21-Neh.13.22"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.14.16", "osis": ["Luke.14.16"]}, {"raw": "Acts.20.7", "osis": ["Acts.20.7"]}, {"raw": "Ps.92", "osis": ["Ps.92"]}, {"raw": "Isa.66.23", "osis": ["Isa.66.23"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.12.1-Matt.12.13", "osis": ["Matt.12.1-Matt.12.13"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 81} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "66", "sort_key": 66, "question": "What is forbidden in the fourth Commandment?", "answer": "The fourth Commandment forbiddeth the Omission or careless Performance of the Duties required, and the profaning the Day by Idleness, or doing that which is in it self sinful; or by unnecessary Thoughts, Words, or Works about worldly Employments or Recreations.", "answer_with_proofs": "The fourth Commandment forbiddeth the Omission or careless Performance of the Duties required[1], and the profaning the Day by Idleness[2], or doing that which is in it self sinful[3]; or by unnecessary Thoughts, Words, or Works about worldly Employments or Recreations[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Ezek.22.26", "osis": ["Ezek.22.26"]}, {"raw": "Amos.8.5", "osis": ["Amos.8.5"]}, {"raw": "Mal.1.13", "osis": ["Mal.1.13"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.20.7,Acts.20.9", "osis": ["Acts.20.7", "Acts.20.9"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Ezek.23.38", "osis": ["Ezek.23.38"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Jer.17.24-Jer.17.27", "osis": ["Jer.17.24-Jer.17.27"]}, {"raw": "Isa.58.13", "osis": ["Isa.58.13"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 70} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "67", "sort_key": 67, "question": "What are the Reasons annexed to the fourth Commandment?", "answer": "The Reasons annexed to the fourth Commandment, are God's allowing us six Days of the Week for our own lawful Employments, his challenging a special Propriety in a Seventh, his own Example, and his blessing the Sabbath Day.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Reasons annexed to the fourth Commandment, are God's allowing us six Days of the Week for our own lawful Employments[1], his challenging a special Propriety in a Seventh, his own Example, and his blessing the Sabbath Day[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.9", "osis": ["Exod.20.9"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.11", "osis": ["Exod.20.11"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 65} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "68", "sort_key": 68, "question": "Which is the fifth Commandment?", "answer": "The fifth Commandment is, \"Honour thy Father and thy Mother; that thy Days may be long upon the Land which the LORD thy God give it thee.\"", "answer_with_proofs": "The fifth Commandment is, \"Honour thy Father and thy Mother; that thy Days may be long upon the Land which the LORD thy God give it thee\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.12", "osis": ["Exod.20.12"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 44} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "69", "sort_key": 69, "question": "What is required in the fifth Commandment?", "answer": "The fifth Commandment requireth the preserving the Honour, and performing the Duties belonging to every one in their several Places and Relations, as Superiours, Inferiors, or Equals.", "answer_with_proofs": "The fifth Commandment requireth the preserving the Honour, and performing the Duties belonging to every one in their several Places and Relations, as Superiours[1], Inferiors[2], or Equals[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.5.21", "osis": ["Eph.5.21"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "1Pet.2.17", "osis": ["1Pet.2.17"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.12.10", "osis": ["Rom.12.10"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 51} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "70", "sort_key": 70, "question": "What is forbidden in the fifth Commandment?", "answer": "The fifth Commandment forbiddeth the neglecting of, or doing any thing against the Honor and Duty which belongeth to every one in their several Places and Relations.", "answer_with_proofs": "The fifth Commandment forbiddeth the neglecting of, or doing any thing against the Honor and Duty which belongeth to every one in their several Places and Relations[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.15.4-Matt.15.6", "osis": ["Matt.15.4-Matt.15.6"]}, {"raw": "Ezek.34.2-Ezek.34.4", "osis": ["Ezek.34.2-Ezek.34.4"]}, {"raw": "Rom.13.8", "osis": ["Rom.13.8"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 49} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "71", "sort_key": 71, "question": "What is the Reason annexed to the fifth Commandment?", "answer": "The reason annexed to the fifth Commandment, is a Promise of long Life and Prosperity (as far as it shall serve for God's Glory, and their own Good) to all such as keep this Commandment.", "answer_with_proofs": "The reason annexed to the fifth Commandment, is a Promise of long Life and Prosperity (as far as it shall serve for God's Glory, and their own Good) to all such as keep this Commandment[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Deut.5.16", "osis": ["Deut.5.16"]}, {"raw": "Eph.6.2-Eph.6.3", "osis": ["Eph.6.2-Eph.6.3"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 61} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "72", "sort_key": 72, "question": "What is the sixth Commandment?", "answer": "The sixth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not kill\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The sixth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not kill\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.13", "osis": ["Exod.20.13"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 24} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "73", "sort_key": 73, "question": "What is required in the sixth Commandment?", "answer": "The sixth Commandment requireth all lawful Endeavors to preserve our own Life, and the Life of others.", "answer_with_proofs": "The sixth Commandment requireth all lawful Endeavors to preserve our own Life[1], and the Life of others[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.5.28-Eph.5.29", "osis": ["Eph.5.28-Eph.5.29"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "1Kgs.18.4", "osis": ["1Kgs.18.4"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 35} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "74", "sort_key": 74, "question": "What is forbidden in the sixth Commandment?", "answer": "The sixth Commandment absolutely forbiddeth the taking away of our own Life; or the Life of our Neighbor unjustly, or whatsoever tendeth thereunto.", "answer_with_proofs": "The sixth Commandment absolutely forbiddeth the taking away of our own Life; or the Life of our Neighbor unjustly, or whatsoever tendeth thereunto[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.16.28", "osis": ["Acts.16.28"]}, {"raw": "Gen.9.6", "osis": ["Gen.9.6"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 45} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "75", "sort_key": 75, "question": "Which is the seventh Commandment?", "answer": "The seventh Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not commit adultery\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The seventh Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not commit adultery\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.14", "osis": ["Exod.20.14"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 25} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "76", "sort_key": 76, "question": "What is required in the seventh Commandment?", "answer": "The seventh Commandment requireth the Preservation of our own, and out Neighbor's Chastity, in Heart, Speech, and Behavior.", "answer_with_proofs": "The seventh Commandment requireth the Preservation of our own, and out Neighbor's Chastity, in Heart, Speech, and Behavior[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.7.2-1Cor.7.3,1Cor.7.5,1Cor.7.34,1Cor.7.36", "osis": ["1Cor.7.2-1Cor.7.3", "1Cor.7.5", "1Cor.7.34", "1Cor.7.36"]}, {"raw": "Col.4.6", "osis": ["Col.4.6"]}, {"raw": "1Pet.3.2", "osis": ["1Pet.3.2"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 41} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "77", "sort_key": 77, "question": "What is forbidden in the seventh Commandment?", "answer": "The seventh Commandment forbiddeth all unchast Thoughts, Words and Actions.", "answer_with_proofs": "The seventh Commandment forbiddeth all unchast Thoughts, Words and Actions[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.15.19", "osis": ["Matt.15.19"]}, {"raw": "Matt.5.28", "osis": ["Matt.5.28"]}, {"raw": "Eph.5.3-Eph.5.4", "osis": ["Eph.5.3-Eph.5.4"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 30} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "78", "sort_key": 78, "question": "Which is the eighth Commandment?", "answer": "The eighth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not steal\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The eighth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not steal\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.15", "osis": ["Exod.20.15"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 24} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "79", "sort_key": 79, "question": "What is required in the eighth Commandment?", "answer": "The eighth Commandment requireth the lawful procuring, and furthering the Wealth and outward Estate of our selves, and others.", "answer_with_proofs": "The eighth Commandment requireth the lawful procuring, and furthering the Wealth and outward Estate of our selves, and others[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.30.30", "osis": ["Gen.30.30"]}, {"raw": "1Tim.5.8", "osis": ["1Tim.5.8"]}, {"raw": "Lev.25.35", "osis": ["Lev.25.35"]}, {"raw": "Deut.22.1-Deut.22.5", "osis": ["Deut.22.1-Deut.22.5"]}, {"raw": "Exod.23.4-Exod.23.5", "osis": ["Exod.23.4-Exod.23.5"]}, {"raw": "Gen.47.14,Gen.47.20", "osis": ["Gen.47.14", "Gen.47.20"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 39} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "80", "sort_key": 80, "question": "What is forbidden in the eighth Commandment?", "answer": "The eighth Commandment forbiddeth whatsoever doth, or may, unjustly hinder our own, or our Neighbour's Wealth, or outward Estate.", "answer_with_proofs": "The eighth Commandment forbiddeth whatsoever doth, or may, unjustly hinder our own, or our Neighbour's Wealth, or outward Estate[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Prov.21.17", "osis": ["Prov.21.17"]}, {"raw": "Prov.23.20-Prov.23.21", "osis": ["Prov.23.20-Prov.23.21"]}, {"raw": "Prov.28.19", "osis": ["Prov.28.19"]}, {"raw": "Eph.4.28", "osis": ["Eph.4.28"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 44} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "81", "sort_key": 81, "question": "Which is the ninth Commandment?", "answer": "The ninth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not bear false Witness against thy Neighbour\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The ninth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not bear false Witness against thy Neighbour\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.16", "osis": ["Exod.20.16"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 30} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "82", "sort_key": 82, "question": "What is required in the ninth Commandment?", "answer": "The ninth Commandment requireth the maintaining and promoting of Truth between Man and Man, and of our own and our Neighbor's good Name, especially in Witness-bearing.", "answer_with_proofs": "The ninth Commandment requireth the maintaining and promoting of Truth between Man and Man[1], and of our own and our Neighbor's good Name[2], especially in Witness-bearing[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Zech.8.16", "osis": ["Zech.8.16"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "3John.1.12", "osis": ["3John.1.12"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Prov.14.5,Prov.14.25", "osis": ["Prov.14.5", "Prov.14.25"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 46} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "83", "sort_key": 83, "question": "What is forbidden in the ninth Commandment?", "answer": "The ninth Commandment forbiddeth whatsoever is prejudicial to Truth, or injurious to our own or our Neighbor's good name.", "answer_with_proofs": "The ninth Commandment forbiddeth whatsoever is prejudicial to Truth, or injurious to our own or our Neighbor's good name[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Sam.17.28", "osis": ["1Sam.17.28"]}, {"raw": "Lev.19.16", "osis": ["Lev.19.16"]}, {"raw": "Ps.15.3", "osis": ["Ps.15.3"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 40} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "84", "sort_key": 84, "question": "Which is the tenth Commandment?", "answer": "The tenth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not covet thy Neighbor's House, that shalt not covet thy Neighbor's Wife, nor his Man-servant, nor his Maid-servant, nor his Ox, nor his Ass, nor any thing that is thy Neighbor's\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The tenth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not covet thy Neighbor's House, that shalt not covet thy Neighbor's Wife, nor his Man-servant, nor his Maid-servant, nor his Ox, nor his Ass, nor any thing that is thy Neighbor's\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.17", "osis": ["Exod.20.17"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 70} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "85", "sort_key": 85, "question": "What is required in the tenth Commandment?", "answer": "The tenth Commandment requireth the full Contentment with our own Condition, with a right and charitable frame of Spirit toward our Neighbor, and all that is his.", "answer_with_proofs": "The tenth Commandment requireth the full Contentment with our own Condition[1], with a right and charitable frame of Spirit toward our Neighbor, and all that is his[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.13.5", "osis": ["Heb.13.5"]}, {"raw": "1Tim.6.6", "osis": ["1Tim.6.6"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Job.31.29", "osis": ["Job.31.29"]}, {"raw": "Rom.12.15", "osis": ["Rom.12.15"]}, {"raw": "1Tim.1.5", "osis": ["1Tim.1.5"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.13.4-1Cor.13.7", "osis": ["1Cor.13.4-1Cor.13.7"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 46} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "86", "sort_key": 86, "question": "What is forbidden in the tenth Commandment?", "answer": "The tenth Commandment forbiddeth all Discontentment with our own Estate; envying or grieving at the Good of our Neighbor, and all inordinate Motions and Affections to any thing that is his.", "answer_with_proofs": "The tenth Commandment forbiddeth all Discontentment with our own Estate[1]; envying or grieving at the Good of our Neighbor[2], and all inordinate Motions and Affections to any thing that is his[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Kgs.21.4", "osis": ["1Kgs.21.4"]}, {"raw": "Esth.5.13", "osis": ["Esth.5.13"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.10.10", "osis": ["1Cor.10.10"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Gal.5.26", "osis": ["Gal.5.26"]}, {"raw": "Jas.3.14,Jas.3.16", "osis": ["Jas.3.14", "Jas.3.16"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.7.7-Rom.7.8", "osis": ["Rom.7.7-Rom.7.8"]}, {"raw": "Rom.13.9", "osis": ["Rom.13.9"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 56} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "87", "sort_key": 87, "question": "Is any Man able perfectly to keep the Commandments of God?", "answer": "No meer Man since the Fall, is able in this Life, perfectly to keep the Commandments of God, but doth daily break them, in Thought, Work, or Deed.", "answer_with_proofs": "No meer Man since the Fall, is able in this Life, perfectly to keep the Commandments of God[1], but doth daily break them, in Thought, Work, or Deed[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Eccl.7.20", "osis": ["Eccl.7.20"]}, {"raw": "1John.1.8,1John.1.10", "osis": ["1John.1.8", "1John.1.10"]}, {"raw": "Gal.5.17", "osis": ["Gal.5.17"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.6.5", "osis": ["Gen.6.5"]}, {"raw": "Gen.8.21", "osis": ["Gen.8.21"]}, {"raw": "Rom.3.9-Rom.3.21", "osis": ["Rom.3.9-Rom.3.21"]}, {"raw": "Jas.3.2-Jas.3.13", "osis": ["Jas.3.2-Jas.3.13"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 55} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "88", "sort_key": 88, "question": "Are all Transgressions of the Law equally heinous?", "answer": "Some Sins in themselves, and by reason of several Aggravations, are more heinous in the sight of God than others.", "answer_with_proofs": "Some Sins in themselves, and by reason of several Aggravations, are more heinous in the sight of God than others[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Ezek.8.6,Ezek.8.13,Ezek.8.15", "osis": ["Ezek.8.6", "Ezek.8.13", "Ezek.8.15"]}, {"raw": "1John.5.16", "osis": ["1John.5.16"]}, {"raw": "Ps.78.17,Ps.78.32,Ps.78.56", "osis": ["Ps.78.17", "Ps.78.32", "Ps.78.56"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 43} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "89", "sort_key": 89, "question": "What doth every Sin deserve?", "answer": "Every Sin deserveth God's Wrath and Curse, both in this Life, and that which is to come.", "answer_with_proofs": "Every Sin deserveth God's Wrath and Curse, both in this Life, and that which is to come[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.5.6", "osis": ["Eph.5.6"]}, {"raw": "Gal.3.10", "osis": ["Gal.3.10"]}, {"raw": "Lam.3.39", "osis": ["Lam.3.39"]}, {"raw": "Matt.25.41", "osis": ["Matt.25.41"]}, {"raw": "Rom.6.23", "osis": ["Rom.6.23"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 34} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "90", "sort_key": 90, "question": "What doth God require of us, that we may escape his Wrath and Curse, due to us for Sin?", "answer": "To escape the Wrath and Curse of God due to us for Sin, God requireth of us Faith in Jesus Christ, Repentance unto Life, with the diligent use all the outward Means, whereby Christ communicateth to us the Benefits of Redemption.", "answer_with_proofs": "To escape the Wrath and Curse of God due to us for Sin, God requireth of us Faith in Jesus Christ, Repentance unto Life[1], with the diligent use all the outward Means, whereby Christ communicateth to us the Benefits of Redemption[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.20.21", "osis": ["Acts.20.21"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Prov.2.1-Prov.2.6", "osis": ["Prov.2.1-Prov.2.6"]}, {"raw": "Prov.8.33-Prov.8.36", "osis": ["Prov.8.33-Prov.8.36"]}, {"raw": "Isa.55.2-Isa.55.3", "osis": ["Isa.55.2-Isa.55.3"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 78} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "91", "sort_key": 91, "question": "What is Faith in Jesus Christ?", "answer": "Faith in Jesus Christ is a saving Grace, whereby we receive, and rest upon him alone for Salvation, as he is offered to us in the Gospel.", "answer_with_proofs": "Faith in Jesus Christ is a saving Grace[1], whereby we receive, and rest upon him alone for Salvation, as he is offered to us in the Gospel[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.10.39", "osis": ["Heb.10.39"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "John.1.12", "osis": ["John.1.12"]}, {"raw": "Isa.26.3-Isa.26.4", "osis": ["Isa.26.3-Isa.26.4"]}, {"raw": "Phil.3.9", "osis": ["Phil.3.9"]}, {"raw": "Gal.2.16", "osis": ["Gal.2.16"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 42} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "92", "sort_key": 92, "question": "What is Repentance unto Life?", "answer": "Repentance unto Life is a saving Grace, whereby a Sinner, out of a true Sense of his Sin, and Apprehension of the Mercy of God in Christ, doth, with grief and hatred of his Sin, turn from it unto God, with full Purpose of, and Endeavor after, new Obedience.", "answer_with_proofs": "Repentance unto Life is a saving Grace[1], whereby a Sinner, out of a true Sense of his Sin[2], and Apprehension of the Mercy of God in Christ[3], doth, with grief and hatred of his Sin, turn from it unto God[4], with full Purpose of, and Endeavor after, new Obedience[5].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.11.28", "osis": ["Acts.11.28"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.2.37-Acts.2.38", "osis": ["Acts.2.37-Acts.2.38"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Joel.2.12", "osis": ["Joel.2.12"]}, {"raw": "Jer.3.22", "osis": ["Jer.3.22"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Jer.31.18-Jer.31.19", "osis": ["Jer.31.18-Jer.31.19"]}, {"raw": "Ezek.36.31", "osis": ["Ezek.36.31"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "2Cor.7.11", "osis": ["2Cor.7.11"]}, {"raw": "Isa.1.16-Isa.1.17", "osis": ["Isa.1.16-Isa.1.17"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 80} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "93", "sort_key": 93, "question": "What are the outward Means, whereby Christ communicateth to us the Benefits of Redemption?", "answer": "The outward in ordinary Means, whereby Christ communicateth to us the Benefits of Redemption, are his Ordinances, especially the Word, Baptism, the Lord's Supper, and Prayer; all which Means are made effectual to the Elect for Salvation.", "answer_with_proofs": "The outward in ordinary Means, whereby Christ communicateth to us the Benefits of Redemption, are his Ordinances, especially the Word, Baptism, the Lord's Supper, and Prayer; all which Means are made effectual to the Elect for Salvation[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.28.19-Matt.28.20", "osis": ["Matt.28.19-Matt.28.20"]}, {"raw": "Acts.2.42,Acts.2.46-Acts.2.47", "osis": ["Acts.2.42", "Acts.2.46-Acts.2.47"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 75} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "94", "sort_key": 94, "question": "How is the Word made effectual to Salvation?", "answer": "The Spirit of God maketh the Reading, but especially the Preaching of the Word, an effectual Means of convincing and converting Sinners; and of building them up in Holiness and Comfort through Faith unto Salvation.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Spirit of God maketh the Reading, but especially the Preaching of the Word, an effectual Means of convincing and converting Sinners; and of building them up in Holiness and Comfort through Faith unto Salvation[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Neh.8.8", "osis": ["Neh.8.8"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.14.24-1Cor.14.25", "osis": ["1Cor.14.24-1Cor.14.25"]}, {"raw": "Acts.26.18", "osis": ["Acts.26.18"]}, {"raw": "Ps.19.8", "osis": ["Ps.19.8"]}, {"raw": "Acts.20.32", "osis": ["Acts.20.32"]}, {"raw": "Rom.15.4", "osis": ["Rom.15.4"]}, {"raw": "1Tim.3.15-1Tim.3.16", "osis": ["1Tim.3.15-1Tim.3.16"]}, {"raw": "Rom.10.13-Rom.10.17", "osis": ["Rom.10.13-Rom.10.17"]}, {"raw": "Rom.1.16", "osis": ["Rom.1.16"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 58} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "95", "sort_key": 95, "question": "How is the Word to be read and heard, that it may become effectual to Salvation?", "answer": "That the Word may become effectual to Salvation, we must attend thereunto with Diligence, Preparation, and Prayer; receive it with Faith and Love, lay it up in our Hearts, and practice it in our Lives.", "answer_with_proofs": "That the Word may become effectual to Salvation, we must attend thereunto with Diligence[1], Preparation[2], and Prayer[3]; receive it with Faith and Love[4], lay it up in our Hearts[5], and practice it in our Lives[6].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Prov.8.34", "osis": ["Prov.8.34"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "1Pet.2.1-1Pet.2.2", "osis": ["1Pet.2.1-1Pet.2.2"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.119.18", "osis": ["Ps.119.18"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.4.2", "osis": ["Heb.4.2"]}, {"raw": "2Thess.2.10", "osis": ["2Thess.2.10"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.119.11", "osis": ["Ps.119.11"]}]}, {"id": 6, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.8.15", "osis": ["Luke.8.15"]}, {"raw": "Jas.1.25", "osis": ["Jas.1.25"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 69} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "96", "sort_key": 96, "question": "How do Baptism and the Lord's Supper, become effectual Means of Salvation?", "answer": "Baptism and the Lord's Supper become effectual Means of Salvation, not for any Virtue in them, or in him that doth administer them, but only by the Blessing of Christ, and the working of the Spirit in those that by Faith received them.", "answer_with_proofs": "Baptism and the Lord's Supper become effectual Means of Salvation, not for any Virtue in them, or in him that doth administer them, but only by the Blessing of Christ[1], and the working of the Spirit in those that by Faith received them[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Pet.3.21", "osis": ["1Pet.3.21"]}, {"raw": "Matt.3.11", "osis": ["Matt.3.11"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.3.6-1Cor.3.7", "osis": ["1Cor.3.6-1Cor.3.7"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.12.13", "osis": ["1Cor.12.13"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 77} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "97", "sort_key": 97, "question": "What is Baptism?", "answer": "Baptism is an Ordinance of the New Testament instituted by Jesus Christ, to be unto the Party baptised, a Sign of his Fellowship with him, in his Death, Burial, and Resurrection; of his being ingrafted into him; of Remission of Sins; and of his giving up himself unto God through Jesus Christ, to live and walk in newness of Life.", "answer_with_proofs": "Baptism is an Ordinance of the New Testament instituted by Jesus Christ[1], to be unto the Party baptised, a Sign of his Fellowship with him, in his Death, Burial, and Resurrection; of his being ingrafted into him[2]; of Remission of Sins[3]; and of his giving up himself unto God through Jesus Christ, to live and walk in newness of Life[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.28.19", "osis": ["Matt.28.19"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.6.3-Rom.6.5", "osis": ["Rom.6.3-Rom.6.5"]}, {"raw": "Col.2.12", "osis": ["Col.2.12"]}, {"raw": "Gal.3.27", "osis": ["Gal.3.27"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Mark.1.4", "osis": ["Mark.1.4"]}, {"raw": "Acts.2.38", "osis": ["Acts.2.38"]}, {"raw": "Acts.22.16", "osis": ["Acts.22.16"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.6.3-Rom.6.4", "osis": ["Rom.6.3-Rom.6.4"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 88} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "98", "sort_key": 98, "question": "To whom is Baptism to be administered?", "answer": "Baptism is to be administered to all those, who actually profess Repentance toward God, Faith in, and Obedience to our Lord Jesus Christ, and to none other.", "answer_with_proofs": "Baptism is to be administered to all those, who actually profess Repentance toward God, Faith in, and Obedience to our Lord Jesus Christ, and to none other[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.3.6", "osis": ["Matt.3.6"]}, {"raw": "Matt.28.19", "osis": ["Matt.28.19"]}, {"raw": "Mark.16.16", "osis": ["Mark.16.16"]}, {"raw": "Acts.2.37-Acts.2.38", "osis": ["Acts.2.37-Acts.2.38"]}, {"raw": "Acts.8.36-Acts.8.38", "osis": ["Acts.8.36-Acts.8.38"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 50} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "99", "sort_key": 99, "question": "Are the Infants of such as are Professing Believers to be baptized?", "answer": "The Infants of such as are professing Believers are not to be baptized, because there is neither Command, or Example in the Holy Scriptures, or certain Consequence from them to baptize such.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Infants of such as are professing Believers are not to be baptized, because there is neither Command, or Example in the Holy Scriptures, or certain Consequence from them to baptize such.", "proofs": [], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 64} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "100", "sort_key": 100, "question": "How is Baptism rightly administered?", "answer": "Baptism is rightly administered, by Immersion, wore dipping the whole Body of the Party in Water, into the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, according to Christ's Institution, and the Practice of the Apostles; and not by the sprinkling or pouring of Water, or dipping some Part of the Body, after the Tradition of Men.", "answer_with_proofs": "Baptism is rightly administered, by Immersion, wore dipping the whole Body of the Party in Water, into the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, according to Christ's Institution, and the Practice of the Apostles[1]; and not by the sprinkling or pouring of Water, or dipping some Part of the Body, after the Tradition of Men.", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.3.16", "osis": ["Matt.3.16"]}, {"raw": "John.3.23", "osis": ["John.3.23"]}, {"raw": "Matt.28.19-Matt.28.20", "osis": ["Matt.28.19-Matt.28.20"]}, {"raw": "Acts.8.38", "osis": ["Acts.8.38"]}, {"raw": "Acts.10.48", "osis": ["Acts.10.48"]}, {"raw": "Rom.6.4", "osis": ["Rom.6.4"]}, {"raw": "Col.2.12", "osis": ["Col.2.12"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 89} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "101", "sort_key": 101, "question": "What is the Duty of such who are rightly baptized?", "answer": "It is the Duty of such who are rightly baptized, to give up themselves to some particular and orderly Church of Jesus Christ, that they may walk in all the Commandments and Ordinances of the Lord blameless.", "answer_with_proofs": "It is the Duty of such who are rightly baptized, to give up themselves to some particular and orderly Church of Jesus Christ, that they may walk in all the Commandments and Ordinances of the Lord blameless[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.2.41-Acts.2.42", "osis": ["Acts.2.41-Acts.2.42"]}, {"raw": "Acts.5.13-Acts.5.14", "osis": ["Acts.5.13-Acts.5.14"]}, {"raw": "Acts.9.26", "osis": ["Acts.9.26"]}, {"raw": "1Pet.2.5", "osis": ["1Pet.2.5"]}, {"raw": "Luke.1.6", "osis": ["Luke.1.6"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 59} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "102", "sort_key": 102, "question": "What is the Lord's Supper?", "answer": "The Lord's Supper is an Ordinance of the New Testament instituted by Jesus Christ; wherein by giving and receiving Bread and Wine, according to his Appointment, his Death is shewed forth; and the worthy Receivers are, not after a Corporal and Carnal manner, but by Faith, made Partakers of his Body and Blood, with all his Benefits, to their spiritual Nourishment, and growth in Grace.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Lord's Supper is an Ordinance of the New Testament instituted by Jesus Christ; wherein by giving and receiving Bread and Wine, according to his Appointment, his Death is shewed forth; and the worthy Receivers are, not after a Corporal and Carnal manner, but by Faith, made Partakers of his Body and Blood, with all his Benefits, to their spiritual Nourishment, and growth in Grace[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.26.26-Matt.26.28", "osis": ["Matt.26.26-Matt.26.28"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.11.23-1Cor.11.26", "osis": ["1Cor.11.23-1Cor.11.26"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.10.16", "osis": ["1Cor.10.16"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 98} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "103", "sort_key": 103, "question": "Who are the proper Subjects of this Ordinance?", "answer": "They who have been baptized upon a personal Profession of their Faith in Jesus Christ, and Repentance from dead Works.", "answer_with_proofs": "They who have been baptized upon a personal Profession of their Faith in Jesus Christ, and Repentance from dead Works[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.2.41-Acts.2.42", "osis": ["Acts.2.41-Acts.2.42"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 38} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "104", "sort_key": 104, "question": "What is required to the worthy receiving of the Lord's Supper?", "answer": "It is required of them that would worthily partake of the Lord's Supper, that they examine themselves, of their Knowledge to discern the Lord's Body, of their Faith to feed upon him, of their Repentance, Love, and new Obedience; lest coming unworthily, they eat and drink Judgment to themselves.", "answer_with_proofs": "It is required of them that would worthily partake of the Lord's Supper, that they examine themselves, of their Knowledge to discern the Lord's Body[1], of their Faith to feed upon him[2], of their Repentance[3], Love[4], and new Obedience[5]; lest coming unworthily, they eat and drink Judgment to themselves[6].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.11.28-1Cor.11.29", "osis": ["1Cor.11.28-1Cor.11.29"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "2Cor.13.5", "osis": ["2Cor.13.5"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.11.31", "osis": ["1Cor.11.31"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.10.16-1Cor.10.17", "osis": ["1Cor.10.16-1Cor.10.17"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.5.7-1Cor.5.8", "osis": ["1Cor.5.7-1Cor.5.8"]}]}, {"id": 6, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.11.28-1Cor.11.29", "osis": ["1Cor.11.28-1Cor.11.29"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 87} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "105", "sort_key": 105, "question": "What is Prayer?", "answer": "Prayer is an offering up our Desires to God, by the Assistance of the Holy Spirit, for things agreeable to his Will, in the Name of Christ believing, with Confession of our Sins, and thankful Acknowledgment of his Mercies.", "answer_with_proofs": "Prayer is an offering up our Desires to God[1], by the Assistance of the Holy Spirit[2], for things agreeable to his Will[3], in the Name of Christ[4] believing[5], with Confession of our Sins[6], and thankful Acknowledgment of his Mercies[7].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.62.8", "osis": ["Ps.62.8"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.8.26", "osis": ["Rom.8.26"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "1John.5.14", "osis": ["1John.5.14"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "John.16.23", "osis": ["John.16.23"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.21.22", "osis": ["Matt.21.22"]}, {"raw": "Jas.1.6", "osis": ["Jas.1.6"]}]}, {"id": 6, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.32.5-Ps.32.6", "osis": ["Ps.32.5-Ps.32.6"]}, {"raw": "Dan.9.4", "osis": ["Dan.9.4"]}]}, {"id": 7, "references": [{"raw": "Phil.4.6", "osis": ["Phil.4.6"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 60} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "106", "sort_key": 106, "question": "What Rule hath God given for our Direction in Prayer?", "answer": "The whole Word of God is of use to direct us in Prayer; but the special Rule of Direction is, that Prayer which Christ taught his Disciples, commonly called, The Lord's Prayer.", "answer_with_proofs": "The whole Word of God is of use to direct us in Prayer[1]; but the special Rule of Direction is, that Prayer which Christ taught his Disciples, commonly called, The Lord's Prayer[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1John.5.14", "osis": ["1John.5.14"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Mark.6.9-Mark.6.13", "osis": ["Mark.6.9-Mark.6.13"]}, {"raw": "Luke.11.2-Luke.11.4", "osis": ["Luke.11.2-Luke.11.4"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 54} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "107", "sort_key": 107, "question": "What doth the Preface of the Lord's Prayer teach us?", "answer": "The Preface of the Lord's Prayer, which is, \"Our Father which art in Heaven,\" teacheth us to draw near to God with all holy Reverence and Confidence, as Children to a Father, able and ready to help us; and that we should pray with and for others.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Preface of the Lord's Prayer, which is, \"Our Father which art in Heaven[1],\" teacheth us to draw near to God with all holy Reverence and Confidence, as Children to a Father, able and ready to help us[2]; and that we should pray with and for others[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.9", "osis": ["Matt.6.9"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.8.15", "osis": ["Rom.8.15"]}, {"raw": "Luke.11.13", "osis": ["Luke.11.13"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.12.5", "osis": ["Acts.12.5"]}, {"raw": "1Tim.2.1-1Tim.2.2", "osis": ["1Tim.2.1-1Tim.2.2"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 77} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "108", "sort_key": 108, "question": "What do we pray for in the first Petition?", "answer": "In the first Petition, which is, \"Hallowed be thy Name,\" we pray, that God would enable us and others, to glorify him in all that, whereby he maketh himself known; and that he would dispose all things to his own Glory.", "answer_with_proofs": "In the first Petition, which is, \"Hallowed be thy Name[1],\" we pray, that God would enable us and others, to glorify him in all that, whereby he maketh himself known[2]; and that he would dispose all things to his own Glory[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.9", "osis": ["Matt.6.9"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.67.2-Ps.67.3", "osis": ["Ps.67.2-Ps.67.3"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.83", "osis": ["Ps.83"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 69} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "109", "sort_key": 109, "question": "What do we pray for in the Second Petition?", "answer": "In the second Petition, which is, \"Thy Kingdom come,\" we pray that Satan's Kingdom may be destroyed, and that the Kingdom of Grace may be advanced, our selves and others brought into it and kept in it, and that the Kingdom of Glory may be hastened.", "answer_with_proofs": "In the second Petition, which is, \"Thy Kingdom come[1],\" we pray that Satan's Kingdom may be destroyed[2], and that the Kingdom of Grace may be advanced[3], our selves and others brought into it and kept in it[4], and that the Kingdom of Glory may be hastened[5].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.10", "osis": ["Matt.6.10"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.68.1,Ps.68.18", "osis": ["Ps.68.1", "Ps.68.18"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Rev.12.10-Rev.12.11", "osis": ["Rev.12.10-Rev.12.11"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "2Thess.3.1", "osis": ["2Thess.3.1"]}, {"raw": "Rom.10.1", "osis": ["Rom.10.1"]}, {"raw": "John.17.19-John.17.20", "osis": ["John.17.19-John.17.20"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "Rev.22.20", "osis": ["Rev.22.20"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 73} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "110", "sort_key": 110, "question": "What do we pray for in the third Petition?", "answer": "In the third Petition, which is, \"Thy Will be done on Earth, as it is in Heaven,\" we pray, that God by his Grace would make us able and willing to know, obey, and submit to his Will in all things, as the Angels do in Heaven.", "answer_with_proofs": "In the third Petition, which is, \"Thy Will be done on Earth, as it is in Heaven[1],\" we pray, that God by his Grace would make us able and willing to know, obey, and submit to his Will in all things[2], as the Angels do in Heaven[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.10", "osis": ["Matt.6.10"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.67", "osis": ["Ps.67"]}, {"raw": "Ps.119.36", "osis": ["Ps.119.36"]}, {"raw": "Matt.26.39", "osis": ["Matt.26.39"]}, {"raw": "2Sam.15.25", "osis": ["2Sam.15.25"]}, {"raw": "Job.1.21", "osis": ["Job.1.21"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.103.20-Ps.103.21", "osis": ["Ps.103.20-Ps.103.21"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 74} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "111", "sort_key": 111, "question": "What do we pray for in the fourth Petition?", "answer": "In the fourth Petition, which is, \"Give us this Day our daily Bread,\" we pray, that of God's free Gift, we may receive a competent Portion of the good Things of this Life, and enjoy his Blessing with them.", "answer_with_proofs": "In the fourth Petition, which is, \"Give us this Day our daily Bread[1],\" we pray, that of God's free Gift, we may receive a competent Portion of the good Things of this Life, and enjoy his Blessing with them[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.11", "osis": ["Matt.6.11"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Prov.30.8-Prov.30.9", "osis": ["Prov.30.8-Prov.30.9"]}, {"raw": "Gen.28.20", "osis": ["Gen.28.20"]}, {"raw": "1Tim.4.4-1Tim.4.5", "osis": ["1Tim.4.4-1Tim.4.5"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 66} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "112", "sort_key": 112, "question": "What do we pray for in the fifth Petition?", "answer": "In the fifth Petition, which is, \"And forgive us our Debts as we forgive our Debtors,\" we pray, that God for Christ's sake would freely pardon all our Sins; which we are the rather encouraged to ask, because by his Grace we are enabled from the Heart to forgive others.", "answer_with_proofs": "In the fifth Petition, which is, \"And forgive us our Debts as we forgive our Debtors[1],\" we pray, that God for Christ's sake would freely pardon all our Sins[2]; which we are the rather encouraged to ask, because by his Grace we are enabled from the Heart to forgive others[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.12", "osis": ["Matt.6.12"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.51.1-Ps.51.2,Ps.51.7,Ps.51.9", "osis": ["Ps.51.1-Ps.51.2", "Ps.51.7", "Ps.51.9"]}, {"raw": "Dan.9.17-Dan.9.19", "osis": ["Dan.9.17-Dan.9.19"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.11.4", "osis": ["Luke.11.4"]}, {"raw": "Matt.18.35", "osis": ["Matt.18.35"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 78} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "113", "sort_key": 113, "question": "What do we pray for in the sixth Petition?", "answer": "In the sixth Petition, which is, \"And lead us not into Temptation, but deliver us from Evil,\" we pray that God would either keep us from being tempted to Sin, or support and deliver us when we are tempted.", "answer_with_proofs": "In the sixth Petition, which is, \"And lead us not into Temptation, but deliver us from Evil[1],\" we pray that God would either keep us from being tempted to Sin[2], or support and deliver us when we are tempted[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.13", "osis": ["Matt.6.13"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.26.41", "osis": ["Matt.26.41"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "2Cor.12.8", "osis": ["2Cor.12.8"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 64} -{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "114", "sort_key": 114, "question": "What doth the Conclusion of the Lord's Prayer teach?", "answer": "The Conclusion of the Lord's Prayer, which is, \"For thine is the Kingdom, and the Power, and the Glory, for ever, Amen,\" teacheth us to take our Encouragement in Prayer from God only, and in our Prayers to praise him, ascribing Kingdom, Power and Glory to him: And in testimony of our Desire, and Assurance to be heard, we say, Amen.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Conclusion of the Lord's Prayer, which is, \"For thine is the Kingdom, and the Power, and the Glory, for ever, Amen[1],\" teacheth us to take our Encouragement in Prayer from God only[2], and in our Prayers to praise him, ascribing Kingdom, Power and Glory to him[3]: And in testimony of our Desire, and Assurance to be heard, we say, Amen[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.13", "osis": ["Matt.6.13"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Dan.9.4,Dan.9.7-Dan.9.9,Dan.9.16-Dan.9.19", "osis": ["Dan.9.4", "Dan.9.7-Dan.9.9", "Dan.9.16-Dan.9.19"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "1Chr.29.10-1Chr.29.13", "osis": ["1Chr.29.10-1Chr.29.13"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.14.16", "osis": ["1Cor.14.16"]}, {"raw": "Rev.22.20-Rev.22.21", "osis": ["Rev.22.20-Rev.22.21"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null, "token_count": 100} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "1", "sort_key": 1, "question": "Who is the First and Chiefest Being?", "answer": "God is the First and Chiefest Being", "answer_with_proofs": "God is the First and Chiefest Being.[1]", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Isa.44.6", "osis": ["Isa.44.6"]}, {"raw": "Isa.48.12", "osis": ["Isa.48.12"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "2", "sort_key": 2, "question": "Ought every One to believe there is a God?", "answer": "Every One ought to believe there is a God; and it is their great Sin and Folly who do not.", "answer_with_proofs": "Every One ought to believe there is a God;[1] and it is their great Sin and Folly who do not.[2]", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.11.6", "osis": ["Heb.11.6"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.14.1", "osis": ["Ps.14.1"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "3", "sort_key": 3, "question": "How may we know there is a God?", "answer": "The Light of Nature in Man, and the Works of God plainly declare there is a God; but his Word and Spirit only, do it fully and effectually, for the Salvation of Sinners.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Light of Nature in Man, and the Works of God plainly declare there is a God;[1] but his Word and Spirit only, do it fully and effectually, for the Salvation of Sinners.[2]", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.1.19-Rom.1.20", "osis": ["Rom.1.19-Rom.1.20"]}, {"raw": "Ps.19.1-Ps.19.3", "osis": ["Ps.19.1-Ps.19.3"]}, {"raw": "Acts.17.24", "osis": ["Acts.17.24"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.2.10", "osis": ["1Cor.2.10"]}, {"raw": "2Tim.3.15-2Tim.3.16", "osis": ["2Tim.3.15-2Tim.3.16"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "4", "sort_key": 4, "question": "What is the Word of God?", "answer": "The Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are the Word of God, and the only certain Rule of Faith and Obedience.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are the Word of God, and the only certain Rule of Faith and Obedience.[1]", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "2Tim.3.16", "osis": ["2Tim.3.16"]}, {"raw": "Eph.2.20", "osis": ["Eph.2.20"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "5", "sort_key": 5, "question": "May all Men make use of the Holy Scriptures?", "answer": "All Men are not only permitted, but commanded and exhorted, to read, hear, and understand the Holy Scriptures.", "answer_with_proofs": "All Men are not only permitted, but commanded and exhorted, to read, hear, and understand the Holy Scriptures.[1]", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "John.5.39", "osis": ["John.5.39"]}, {"raw": "Deut.17.18-Deut.17.19", "osis": ["Deut.17.18-Deut.17.19"]}, {"raw": "Rev.1.3", "osis": ["Rev.1.3"]}, {"raw": "Acts.8.30", "osis": ["Acts.8.30"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "6", "sort_key": 6, "question": "What things are chiefly contained in the Holy Scriptures?", "answer": "The Holy Scriptures chiefly contain, what Man ought to believe concerning God, and what Duty God requireth of Man.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Holy Scriptures chiefly contain, what Man ought to believe concerning God, and what Duty God requireth of Man.[1]", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "2Tim.1.13", "osis": ["2Tim.1.13"]}, {"raw": "2Tim.3.15-2Tim.3.16", "osis": ["2Tim.3.15-2Tim.3.16"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "7", "sort_key": 7, "question": "What is God?", "answer": "God is a Spirit, Infinite, Eternal, and Unchangeable, in his Being, Wisdom, Power, Holiness, Justice, Goodness and Truth.", "answer_with_proofs": "God is a Spirit[1], Infinite[2], Eternal[3], and Unchangeable[4], in his Being[5], Wisdom[6], Power[7], Holiness[8], Justice, Goodness and Truth[9].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "John.4.24", "osis": ["John.4.24"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Job.11.7-Job.11.9", "osis": ["Job.11.7-Job.11.9"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.90.2", "osis": ["Ps.90.2"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Jas.1.17", "osis": ["Jas.1.17"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.3.14", "osis": ["Exod.3.14"]}]}, {"id": 6, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.147.5", "osis": ["Ps.147.5"]}]}, {"id": 7, "references": [{"raw": "Rev.4.8", "osis": ["Rev.4.8"]}]}, {"id": 8, "references": [{"raw": "Rev.15.4", "osis": ["Rev.15.4"]}]}, {"id": 9, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.34.6-Exod.34.7", "osis": ["Exod.34.6-Exod.34.7"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "8", "sort_key": 8, "question": "Are there more Gods than One?", "answer": "There is but One only, the Living and True God.", "answer_with_proofs": "There is but One only, the Living and True God[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Deut.6.4", "osis": ["Deut.6.4"]}, {"raw": "Jer.10.10", "osis": ["Jer.10.10"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "9", "sort_key": 9, "question": "How many Persons are there in the Godhead?", "answer": "There are Three Persons in the Godhead, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit; and these Three are One God, the same in Essence, equal in Power and Glory.", "answer_with_proofs": "There are Three Persons in the Godhead, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit; and these Three are One God, the same in Essence, equal in Power and Glory[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1John.5.7", "osis": ["1John.5.7"]}, {"raw": "Matt.28.19", "osis": ["Matt.28.19"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "10", "sort_key": 10, "question": "What are the Decrees of God?", "answer": "The Decrees of God are, his Eternal Purpose according to the Counsel of his Will, whereby, for his own Glory, he hath foreordained whatsoever comes to pass.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Decrees of God are, his Eternal Purpose according to the Counsel of his Will, whereby, for his own Glory, he hath foreordained whatsoever comes to pass[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.1.4,Eph.1.11", "osis": ["Eph.1.4", "Eph.1.11"]}, {"raw": "Rom.9.22-Rom.9.23", "osis": ["Rom.9.22-Rom.9.23"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "11", "sort_key": 11, "question": "How doth God execute his Decrees?", "answer": "God executeth his Decrees in the Works of Creation and Providence", "answer_with_proofs": "God executeth his Decrees in the Works of Creation and Providence", "proofs": [], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "12", "sort_key": 12, "question": "What is the Work of Creation?", "answer": "The Work of Creation , is God's making all Things of Nothing, by the Word of his Power, in the space of six Days, and all very Good.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Work of Creation , is God's making all Things of Nothing, by the Word of his Power, in the space of six Days, and all very Good[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.1", "osis": ["Gen.1"]}, {"raw": "Heb.11.3", "osis": ["Heb.11.3"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "13", "sort_key": 13, "question": "How did God create Man?", "answer": "God created Man, Male and Female, after his own Image, in Knowledge, Righteousness and Holiness, with Dominion over the Creatures.", "answer_with_proofs": "God created Man, Male and Female, after his own Image, in Knowledge, Righteousness and Holiness, with Dominion over the Creatures[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.1.26-Gen.1.28", "osis": ["Gen.1.26-Gen.1.28"]}, {"raw": "Col.3.10", "osis": ["Col.3.10"]}, {"raw": "Eph.4.24", "osis": ["Eph.4.24"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "14", "sort_key": 14, "question": "What are God's Works of Providence?", "answer": "God's Works of Providence, are his most Holy, Wise, and Powerful preserving, and governing all his Creatures, and all their Actions.", "answer_with_proofs": "God's Works of Providence, are his most Holy[1], Wise[2], and Powerful preserving[3], and governing all his Creatures, and all their Actions[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.145.17", "osis": ["Ps.145.17"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.104.24", "osis": ["Ps.104.24"]}, {"raw": "Isa.28.29", "osis": ["Isa.28.29"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.1.3", "osis": ["Heb.1.3"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.103.19", "osis": ["Ps.103.19"]}, {"raw": "Matt.10.29-Matt.10.31", "osis": ["Matt.10.29-Matt.10.31"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "15", "sort_key": 15, "question": "What special Act of Providence did God exercise towards Man in the Estate wherein he was created?", "answer": "When God had created Man, he entered into a Covenant of Life with him, upon Condition of perfect Obedience: forbidding him to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, upon pain of Death.", "answer_with_proofs": "When God had created Man, he entered into a Covenant of Life with him, upon Condition of perfect Obedience: forbidding him to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, upon pain of Death[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gal.3.12", "osis": ["Gal.3.12"]}, {"raw": "Gen.2.17", "osis": ["Gen.2.17"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "16", "sort_key": 16, "question": "Did our first Parents continue in the Estate wherein they were created?", "answer": "Our first Parents being left to the freedom of their own Will, fell from the Estate wherein they were created, by sinning against God.", "answer_with_proofs": "Our first Parents being left to the freedom of their own Will, fell from the Estate wherein they were created, by sinning against God[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.3.6-Gen.3.8,Gen.3.13", "osis": ["Gen.3.6-Gen.3.8", "Gen.3.13"]}, {"raw": "Eccl.7.29", "osis": ["Eccl.7.29"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "17", "sort_key": 17, "question": "What is Sin?", "answer": "Sin is any want of Conformity unto, or Transgression of the Law of God.", "answer_with_proofs": "Sin is any want of Conformity unto, or Transgression of the Law of God[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1John.3.4", "osis": ["1John.3.4"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "18", "sort_key": 18, "question": "What was the Sin whereby our first Parents fell from the Estate wherein they were created?", "answer": "The Sin whereby our first Parents fell from the Estate wherein they were created, was their eating the forbidden Fruit.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Sin whereby our first Parents fell from the Estate wherein they were created, was their eating the forbidden Fruit[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.3.6,Gen.3.12", "osis": ["Gen.3.6", "Gen.3.12"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "19", "sort_key": 19, "question": "Did all Mankind fall in Adam's first Transgression?", "answer": "The Covenant being made with Adam, not only for himself, but for his Posterity, all Mankind descending from him by ordinary Generation, sinned in him, and fell with him in his first Transgression.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Covenant being made with Adam, not only for himself, but for his Posterity, all Mankind descending from him by ordinary Generation, sinned in him, and fell with him in his first Transgression[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.2.16-Gen.2.17", "osis": ["Gen.2.16-Gen.2.17"]}, {"raw": "Rom.5.12", "osis": ["Rom.5.12"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.15.21-1Cor.15.22", "osis": ["1Cor.15.21-1Cor.15.22"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "20", "sort_key": 20, "question": "Into what Estate did the Fall bring Mankind?", "answer": "The Fall brought Mankind into an Estate of Sin and Misery.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Fall brought Mankind into an Estate of Sin and Misery[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.5.12", "osis": ["Rom.5.12"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "21", "sort_key": 21, "question": "Wherein consists the sinfulness of that Estate whereinto Man fell?", "answer": "The sinfulness of that Estate whereinto Man fell, consists in the Guilt of Adam's first Sin, the want of Original Righteousness, and the Corruption of his whole Nature, which is commonly called Original Sin; together with all actual Transgressions which proceed from it.", "answer_with_proofs": "The sinfulness of that Estate whereinto Man fell, consists in the Guilt of Adam's first Sin, the want of Original Righteousness, and the Corruption of his whole Nature, which is commonly called Original Sin; together with all actual Transgressions which proceed from it[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.5.12-Rom.5.21", "osis": ["Rom.5.12-Rom.5.21"]}, {"raw": "Eph.2.1-Eph.2.3", "osis": ["Eph.2.1-Eph.2.3"]}, {"raw": "Jas.1.14-Jas.1.15", "osis": ["Jas.1.14-Jas.1.15"]}, {"raw": "Matt.15.19", "osis": ["Matt.15.19"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "22", "sort_key": 22, "question": "What is the Misery of that Estate whereinto Man fell?", "answer": "All Mankind by their Fall lost Communion with God, are under his Wrath and Curse; and so make liable to all Miseries in this Life, to Death it self, and to the Pains of Hell for ever.", "answer_with_proofs": "All Mankind by their Fall lost Communion with God[1], are under his Wrath and Curse[2]; and so make liable to all Miseries in this Life, to Death it self, and to the Pains of Hell for ever[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.3.8,Gen.3.10,Gen.3.24", "osis": ["Gen.3.8", "Gen.3.10", "Gen.3.24"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.2.2-Eph.2.3", "osis": ["Eph.2.2-Eph.2.3"]}, {"raw": "Gal.3.10", "osis": ["Gal.3.10"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Lam.3.39", "osis": ["Lam.3.39"]}, {"raw": "Rom.6.23", "osis": ["Rom.6.23"]}, {"raw": "Matt.25.41-Matt.25.46", "osis": ["Matt.25.41-Matt.25.46"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "23", "sort_key": 23, "question": "Did God leave all Mankind to perish in the Estate of Sin and Misery?", "answer": "God, having out of his meer good pleasure, from all Eternity, elected some to Everlasting Life, did enter into a Covenant of Grace, to deliver them out of the Estate of Sin and Misery, and to bring them into an Estate of Salvation by a Redeemer.", "answer_with_proofs": "God, having out of his meer good pleasure, from all Eternity, elected some to Everlasting Life[1], did enter into a Covenant of Grace, to deliver them out of the Estate of Sin and Misery, and to bring them into an Estate of Salvation by a Redeemer[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.1.4-Eph.1.5", "osis": ["Eph.1.4-Eph.1.5"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.3.20-Rom.3.22", "osis": ["Rom.3.20-Rom.3.22"]}, {"raw": "Gal.3.21-Gal.3.22", "osis": ["Gal.3.21-Gal.3.22"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "24", "sort_key": 24, "question": "Who is the Redeemer of God's Elect?", "answer": "The only Redeemer of God's Elect, is the Lord Jesus Christ; who being the Eternal Son of God, became Man, and so was; and continueth to be God and Man, in two distinct Natures, and one Person for ever.", "answer_with_proofs": "The only Redeemer of God's Elect, is the Lord Jesus Christ[1]; who being the Eternal Son of God, became Man[2], and so was; and continueth to be God and Man, in two distinct Natures, and one Person for ever[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Tim.2.5-1Tim.2.6", "osis": ["1Tim.2.5-1Tim.2.6"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "John.1.14", "osis": ["John.1.14"]}, {"raw": "Gal.4.4", "osis": ["Gal.4.4"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.9.5,Luke.1.23", "osis": ["Rom.9.5", "Luke.1.23"]}, {"raw": "Col.2.9", "osis": ["Col.2.9"]}, {"raw": "Heb.7.24-Heb.7.25", "osis": ["Heb.7.24-Heb.7.25"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "25", "sort_key": 25, "question": "How did Christ, being the Son of God, become Man?", "answer": "Christ the Son of God became Man, by taking to himself a true Body, and a reasonable Soul; being conceived by the Power of the Holy Spirit in the Womb of the Virgin Mary, and born of her, yet without Sin.", "answer_with_proofs": "Christ the Son of God became Man, by taking to himself a true Body[1], and a reasonable Soul[2]; being conceived by the Power of the Holy Spirit in the Womb of the Virgin Mary, and born of her[3], yet without Sin[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.2.14,Heb.2.16,Heb.10.5", "osis": ["Heb.2.14", "Heb.2.16", "Heb.10.5"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.26.38", "osis": ["Matt.26.38"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.1.27,Luke.1.31,Luke.1.34-Luke.1.35,Luke.1.42", "osis": ["Luke.1.27", "Luke.1.31", "Luke.1.34-Luke.1.35", "Luke.1.42"]}, {"raw": "Gal.4.4", "osis": ["Gal.4.4"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.4.15,Heb.7.26", "osis": ["Heb.4.15", "Heb.7.26"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "26", "sort_key": 26, "question": "What Offices doth Christ execute as our Redeemer?", "answer": "Christ as our Redeemer executeth the Offices of a Prophet, of a Priest, and of a King, both in his Estate of Humiliation and Exaltation.", "answer_with_proofs": "Christ as our Redeemer executeth the Offices of a Prophet, of a Priest, and of a King, both in his Estate of Humiliation and Exaltation[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.3.22", "osis": ["Acts.3.22"]}, {"raw": "Heb.12.25,2Cor.13.3", "osis": ["Heb.12.25", "2Cor.13.3"]}, {"raw": "Heb.5.5-Heb.5.7,Heb.7.25", "osis": ["Heb.5.5-Heb.5.7", "Heb.7.25"]}, {"raw": "Ps.2.6", "osis": ["Ps.2.6"]}, {"raw": "Isa.9.6-Isa.9.7", "osis": ["Isa.9.6-Isa.9.7"]}, {"raw": "Matt.21.5", "osis": ["Matt.21.5"]}, {"raw": "Ps.2.8-Ps.2.11", "osis": ["Ps.2.8-Ps.2.11"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "27", "sort_key": 27, "question": "How doth Christ execute the Office of a Prophet?", "answer": "Christ executeth the Office of a Prophet, in revealing to us, by his Word and Spirit, the Will of God for our Salvation.", "answer_with_proofs": "Christ executeth the Office of a Prophet, in revealing to us, by his Word and Spirit, the Will of God for our Salvation[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "John.1.18", "osis": ["John.1.18"]}, {"raw": "1Pet.1.10-1Pet.1.12", "osis": ["1Pet.1.10-1Pet.1.12"]}, {"raw": "John.15.15,John.20.31", "osis": ["John.15.15", "John.20.31"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "28", "sort_key": 28, "question": "How doth Christ execute the Office of a Priest?", "answer": "Christ executeth the Office of a Priest, in his once offering up of himself a Sacrifice to satisfy Divine Justice, and reconcile us to God, and in making continual Intercession for us.", "answer_with_proofs": "Christ executeth the Office of a Priest, in his once offering up of himself a Sacrifice to satisfy Divine Justice[1], and reconcile us to God[2], and in making continual Intercession for us[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.9.14,Heb.9.28", "osis": ["Heb.9.14", "Heb.9.28"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.2.17", "osis": ["Heb.2.17"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.7.24-Heb.7.25", "osis": ["Heb.7.24-Heb.7.25"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "29", "sort_key": 29, "question": "How doth Christ execute the Office of a King?", "answer": "Christ executeth the Office of a King, in subduing us to himself, in ruling, and defending us, and in restraining and conquering all his and our Enemies.", "answer_with_proofs": "Christ executeth the Office of a King, in subduing us to himself[1], in ruling[2], and defending us[3], and in restraining and conquering all his and our Enemies[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.15.14-Acts.15.16", "osis": ["Acts.15.14-Acts.15.16"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Isa.33.22", "osis": ["Isa.33.22"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Isa.32.1-Isa.32.2", "osis": ["Isa.32.1-Isa.32.2"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.15.25", "osis": ["1Cor.15.25"]}, {"raw": "Ps.110", "osis": ["Ps.110"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "30", "sort_key": 30, "question": "Wherein did Christ's Humiliation consist?", "answer": "Christ's Humiliation consisted in his being born, and that in a low Condition; made under the Law, undergoing the Miseries of this Life, the Wrath of God, and the cursed Death of the Cross; in being buried, and continuing under the Power of Death for a time. Mat. 12:40.", "answer_with_proofs": "Christ's Humiliation consisted in his being born, and that in a low Condition[1]; made under the Law[2], undergoing the Miseries of this Life[3], the Wrath of God[4], and the cursed Death of the Cross[5]; in being buried[6], and continuing under the Power of Death for a time[7]. Mat. 12:40.", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.2.7", "osis": ["Luke.2.7"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Gal.4.4", "osis": ["Gal.4.4"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.12.2-Heb.12.3", "osis": ["Heb.12.2-Heb.12.3"]}, {"raw": "Isa.53.2-Isa.53.3", "osis": ["Isa.53.2-Isa.53.3"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.22.44", "osis": ["Luke.22.44"]}, {"raw": "Matt.27.46", "osis": ["Matt.27.46"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "Phil.2.8", "osis": ["Phil.2.8"]}]}, {"id": 6, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.15.4", "osis": ["1Cor.15.4"]}]}, {"id": 7, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.2.24-Acts.2.27,Acts.2.31", "osis": ["Acts.2.24-Acts.2.27", "Acts.2.31"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "31", "sort_key": 31, "question": "Wherein consisteth Christ's Exaltation?", "answer": "Christ's Exaltation consisteth in his rising again from the Dead on the third Day, in ascending up into Heaven, in sitting at the right Hand of God the Father, and in coming to judg the World at the last Day.", "answer_with_proofs": "Christ's Exaltation consisteth in his rising again from the Dead on the third Day[1], in ascending up into Heaven[2], in sitting at the right Hand of God the Father[3], and in coming to judg the World at the last Day[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.15.4", "osis": ["1Cor.15.4"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Mark.16.19", "osis": ["Mark.16.19"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.1.20", "osis": ["Eph.1.20"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.1.11,Acts.17.31", "osis": ["Acts.1.11", "Acts.17.31"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "32", "sort_key": 32, "question": "How are we made Partakers of the Redemption purchased by Christ?", "answer": "We are made Partakers of the Redemption purchased by Christ, by the effectual Application of it to us by his Holy Spirit.", "answer_with_proofs": "We are made Partakers of the Redemption purchased by Christ, by the effectual Application of it to us[1] by his Holy Spirit[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "John.1.11-John.1.12", "osis": ["John.1.11-John.1.12"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Titus.3.5-Titus.3.6", "osis": ["Titus.3.5-Titus.3.6"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "33", "sort_key": 33, "question": "How doth the Spirit apply to us the Redemption purchased by Christ?", "answer": "The Spirit applieth to us the Redemption purchased by Chrift, by working Faith in us, and thereby uniting us to Christ, in our effectual Calling.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Spirit applieth to us the Redemption purchased by Chrift, by working Faith in us[1], and thereby uniting us to Christ, in our effectual Calling[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.1.13-Eph.1.14", "osis": ["Eph.1.13-Eph.1.14"]}, {"raw": "John.6.37,John.6.39", "osis": ["John.6.37", "John.6.39"]}, {"raw": "Eph.2.8", "osis": ["Eph.2.8"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.3.17", "osis": ["Eph.3.17"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.1.9", "osis": ["1Cor.1.9"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "34", "sort_key": 34, "question": "What is effectual Calling?", "answer": "Effectual Calling, is the Work of God's Spirit, whereby, convincing us of our Sin and Misery, enlightening our Minds in the knowledge of Christ, and renewing our Wills, he doth persuade and enable us to embrace Jesus Christ freely offered to us in the Gospel.", "answer_with_proofs": "Effectual Calling, is the Work of God's Spirit[1], whereby, convincing us of our Sin and Misery[2], enlightening our Minds in the knowledge of Christ[3], and renewing our Wills[4], he doth persuade and enable us to embrace Jesus Christ freely offered to us in the Gospel[5].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "2Tim.1.9", "osis": ["2Tim.1.9"]}, {"raw": "2Thess.2.13-2Thess.2.14", "osis": ["2Thess.2.13-2Thess.2.14"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.2.37", "osis": ["Acts.2.37"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.26.18", "osis": ["Acts.26.18"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Ezek.36.26-Ezek.36.27", "osis": ["Ezek.36.26-Ezek.36.27"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "John.6.44-John.6.45", "osis": ["John.6.44-John.6.45"]}, {"raw": "Phil.2.13", "osis": ["Phil.2.13"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "35", "sort_key": 35, "question": "What Benefits do they that are effectually called, partake of in this Life?", "answer": "They that are effectually called, do in this Life partake of Justification, Adoption, Sanctification, and the several Benefits which in this Life do either accompany or flow from them.", "answer_with_proofs": "They that are effectually called, do in this Life partake of Justification[1], Adoption[2], Sanctification, and the several Benefits which in this Life do either accompany or flow from them[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.8.30", "osis": ["Rom.8.30"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.1.5", "osis": ["Eph.1.5"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.1.30", "osis": ["1Cor.1.30"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "36", "sort_key": 36, "question": "What is Justification?", "answer": "Justification is an Act of God's free Grace, wherein he pardoneth all our Sins, and accepteth us as Righteous in his sight, only for the Righteousness of Christ imputed us, and received by Faith alone.", "answer_with_proofs": "Justification is an Act of God's free Grace, wherein he pardoneth all our Sins[1], and accepteth us as Righteous in his sight[2], only for the Righteousness of Christ imputed us[3], and received by Faith alone[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.3.24-Rom.3.25", "osis": ["Rom.3.24-Rom.3.25"]}, {"raw": "Rom.4.6-Rom.4.8", "osis": ["Rom.4.6-Rom.4.8"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "2Cor.5.19,2Cor.5.21", "osis": ["2Cor.5.19", "2Cor.5.21"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.5.17-Rom.5.19", "osis": ["Rom.5.17-Rom.5.19"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Gal.2.16", "osis": ["Gal.2.16"]}, {"raw": "Phil.3.9", "osis": ["Phil.3.9"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "37", "sort_key": 37, "question": "What is Adoption?", "answer": "Adoption is an Act of God's free Grace, whereby we are received into the Number, and have a Right to all the Privileges of the Sons of God.", "answer_with_proofs": "Adoption is an Act of God's free Grace[1], whereby we are received into the Number, and have a Right to all the Privileges of the Sons of God[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1John.3.1", "osis": ["1John.3.1"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.8.14", "osis": ["Rom.8.14"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "38", "sort_key": 38, "question": "What is Sanctification?", "answer": "Sanctification is the Work of God's free Grace, whereby we are renewed in the whole Man after the Image of God, and are enabled more and more to die unto Sin, and live unto Righteousness.", "answer_with_proofs": "Sanctification is the Work of God's free Grace[1], whereby we are renewed in the whole Man after the Image of God[2], and are enabled more and more to die unto Sin, and live unto Righteousness[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "2Thess.2.13", "osis": ["2Thess.2.13"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.4.23-Eph.4.24", "osis": ["Eph.4.23-Eph.4.24"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.6.4,Rom.6.6", "osis": ["Rom.6.4", "Rom.6.6"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "39", "sort_key": 39, "question": "What are the Benefits which in this Life do accompany or flow from Justification, Adoption, and Sanctification?", "answer": "The Benefits which in this Life do accompany or flow from Justification, Adoption, and Sanctification, are Assurance of God's Love, Peace of Conscience, Joy in the Holy Spirit, Increase of Grace, and Perseverance therein to the End.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Benefits which in this Life do accompany or flow from Justification, Adoption, and Sanctification, are Assurance of God's Love, Peace of Conscience[1], Joy in the Holy Spirit[2], Increase of Grace[3], and Perseverance therein to the End[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.5.1-Rom.5.2,Rom.5.5", "osis": ["Rom.5.1-Rom.5.2", "Rom.5.5"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.14.17", "osis": ["Rom.14.17"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Prov.4.18", "osis": ["Prov.4.18"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "1John.5.13", "osis": ["1John.5.13"]}, {"raw": "1Pet.1.5", "osis": ["1Pet.1.5"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "40", "sort_key": 40, "question": "What Benefits do Believers receive from Christ at their Death?", "answer": "The Souls of Believers are at their Death made, perfect in Holiness, and do immediately pass into Glory: And their Bodies being still united to Christ, do rest in their Graves till the Refurrection.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Souls of Believers are at their Death made, perfect in Holiness[1], and do immediately pass into Glory[2]: And their Bodies being still united to Christ[3], do rest in their Graves[4] till the Resurrection[5].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.12.23", "osis": ["Heb.12.23"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "2Cor.5.1,2Cor.5.6,2Cor.5.8", "osis": ["2Cor.5.1", "2Cor.5.6", "2Cor.5.8"]}, {"raw": "Phil.1.23", "osis": ["Phil.1.23"]}, {"raw": "Luke.23.43", "osis": ["Luke.23.43"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "1Thess.4.14", "osis": ["1Thess.4.14"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Isa.57.2", "osis": ["Isa.57.2"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "Job.19.26-Job.19.27", "osis": ["Job.19.26-Job.19.27"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "41", "sort_key": 41, "question": "What Benefits do Believers receive from Christ at the Resurrection?", "answer": "At the Resurrection Believers being raised up in Glory, shall be openly acknowledged, and acquitted in the Day of Judgement, and made perfectly blessed, both in Soul and Body, in the full enjoyment of God, to all Eternity.", "answer_with_proofs": "At the Resurrection Believers being raised up in Glory[1], shall be openly acknowledged, and acquitted in the Day of Judgement[2], and made perfectly blessed, both in Soul and Body, in the full enjoyment of God[3], to all Eternity[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.15.43", "osis": ["1Cor.15.43"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.25.23", "osis": ["Matt.25.23"]}, {"raw": "Matt.10.32", "osis": ["Matt.10.32"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "1John.3.2", "osis": ["1John.3.2"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.13.12", "osis": ["1Cor.13.12"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "1Thess.4.17-1Thess.4.18", "osis": ["1Thess.4.17-1Thess.4.18"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "42", "sort_key": 42, "question": "But what shall be done to the Wicked at their Death?", "answer": "The Souls of the Wicked shall at their death be cast into the Torments of Hell, and their Bodies lie in their Graves, till the Refurrection and Judgment of the Great Day.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Souls of the Wicked shall at their death be cast into the Torments of Hell, and their Bodies lie in their Graves, till the Refurrection and Judgment of the Great Day[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.16.23-Luke.16.24", "osis": ["Luke.16.23-Luke.16.24"]}, {"raw": "Acts.1.25", "osis": ["Acts.1.25"]}, {"raw": "Jude.1.7", "osis": ["Jude.1.7"]}, {"raw": "1Pet.3.19", "osis": ["1Pet.3.19"]}, {"raw": "Ps.49.14", "osis": ["Ps.49.14"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "43", "sort_key": 43, "question": "What shall be done to the Wicked at the Day of Judgment?", "answer": null, "answer_with_proofs": "At the Day of Judgment the Bodies of the Wicked being raised out of their Graves, shall be sentenced together with their Souls, to unspeakable Torments, with the Devil and his Angels for ever[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "John.5.28-John.5.29", "osis": ["John.5.28-John.5.29"]}, {"raw": "Matt.25.41,Matt.25.46", "osis": ["Matt.25.41", "Matt.25.46"]}, {"raw": "2Thess.1.8-2Thess.1.9", "osis": ["2Thess.1.8-2Thess.1.9"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "44", "sort_key": 44, "question": "What is the Duty which God requireth of Man?", "answer": "The Duty which God requireth of Man, is Obedience to his Revealed Will.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Duty which God requireth of Man, is Obedience to his Revealed Will[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Mic.6.8", "osis": ["Mic.6.8"]}, {"raw": "1Sam.15.22", "osis": ["1Sam.15.22"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "45", "sort_key": 45, "question": "What did God at first reveal to Man for the Rule of his Obedience?", "answer": "The Rule which God at first revealed to Man for his Obedience, was the Moral Law.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Rule which God at first revealed to Man for his Obedience, was the Moral Law[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.2.14-Rom.2.15", "osis": ["Rom.2.14-Rom.2.15"]}, {"raw": "Rom.10.5", "osis": ["Rom.10.5"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "46", "sort_key": 46, "question": "Where is the Moral Law summarily comprehended?", "answer": "The Moral Law is summarily comprehended in the Ten Commandments.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Moral Law is summarily comprehended in the Ten Commandments[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Deut.10.4", "osis": ["Deut.10.4"]}, {"raw": "Matt.19.17", "osis": ["Matt.19.17"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "47", "sort_key": 47, "question": "What is the Sum of the Ten Commandments?", "answer": "The Sum of the Ten Commandments is, to love the Lord our God, with all our Heart, with all our Soul, with all our Strength, and with all our Mind; and our Neighbour as our Selves.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Sum of the Ten Commandments is, to love the Lord our God, with all our Heart, with all our Soul, with all our Strength, and with all our Mind; and our Neighbour as our Selves[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.22.37-Matt.22.40", "osis": ["Matt.22.37-Matt.22.40"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "48", "sort_key": 48, "question": "What is the Preface to the Ten Commandments?", "answer": "The Preface to the Ten Commandments, is in these words, \"I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the Land of Egypt, out of the House of Bondage\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The Preface to the Ten Commandments, is in these words, \"I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the Land of Egypt, out of the House of Bondage\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.2", "osis": ["Exod.20.2"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "49", "sort_key": 49, "question": "What doth the Preface to the Ten Commandments teach us?", "answer": "The Preface to the Ten Commandments teacheth us, that because God is the LORD, and our God, and Redeemer, therefore we are bound to keep all his Commandments.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Preface to the Ten Commandments teacheth us, that because God is the LORD, and our God, and Redeemer, therefore we are bound to keep all his Commandments[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.1.74-Luke.1.75", "osis": ["Luke.1.74-Luke.1.75"]}, {"raw": "1Pet.1.15-1Pet.1.19", "osis": ["1Pet.1.15-1Pet.1.19"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "50", "sort_key": 50, "question": "Which is the first Commandment?", "answer": "The first Commandment is, \"Thou shalt have no other Gods before me\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The first Commandment is, \"Thou shalt have no other Gods before me\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.3", "osis": ["Exod.20.3"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "51", "sort_key": 51, "question": "What is required in the first Commandment?", "answer": "The first Commandment requireth us, to know and acknowledge God to be the only true God, and our God; and to worship and glorify him accordingly.", "answer_with_proofs": "The first Commandment requireth us, to know and acknowledge God to be the only true God, and our God[1]; and to worship and glorify him accordingly[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Chr.28.9", "osis": ["1Chr.28.9"]}, {"raw": "Deut.26.17", "osis": ["Deut.26.17"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.4.10", "osis": ["Matt.4.10"]}, {"raw": "Ps.29.2", "osis": ["Ps.29.2"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "52", "sort_key": 52, "question": "What is forbidden in the first Commandment?", "answer": "The first Commandment forbiddeth the denying, or not worshipping and glorifying the true God, as God, and our God; and the giving that Worship and Glory to any other, which is due unto him a alone.", "answer_with_proofs": "The first Commandment forbiddeth the denying[1], or not worshipping and glorifying the true God, as God[2], and our God[3]; and the giving that Worship and Glory to any other, which is due unto him alone[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.14.1", "osis": ["Ps.14.1"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.1.21", "osis": ["Rom.1.21"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.81.10-Ps.81.11", "osis": ["Ps.81.10-Ps.81.11"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.1.25-Rom.1.26", "osis": ["Rom.1.25-Rom.1.26"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "53", "sort_key": 53, "question": "What are we specially taught by these words \"before me\" in the first Commandment?", "answer": "These words \"before me\" in the first Commandment, teach us, that God who seeth all things, taketh notice of, and is much displeased with the Sin of having any other God.", "answer_with_proofs": "These words \"before me\" in the first Commandment, teach us, that God who seeth all things, taketh notice of, and is much displeased with the Sin of having any other God[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Ezek.8.5-Ezek.8.18", "osis": ["Ezek.8.5-Ezek.8.18"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "54", "sort_key": 54, "question": "Which is the second Commandment?", "answer": "The second Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven Image, or any Likeness of any thing that is in Heaven above, or that is in the Earth beneath, or that is in the Water under the Earth; thou shalt not bow down thy self to them, nor serve them: For I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the Iniquity of the Fathers upon the Children, unto the Third and Fourth Generation of them that hate me; and shewing Mercy unto Thousands of them that love me and keep my Commandments.", "answer_with_proofs": "The second Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven Image, or any Likeness of any thing that is in Heaven above, or that is in the Earth beneath, or that is in the Water under the Earth; thou shalt not bow down thy self to them, nor serve them: For I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the Iniquity of the Fathers upon the Children, unto the Third and Fourth Generation of them that hate me; and shewing Mercy unto Thousands of them that love me and keep my Commandments[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.4-Exod.20.6", "osis": ["Exod.20.4-Exod.20.6"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "55", "sort_key": 55, "question": "What is required in the second Commandment?", "answer": "The second Commandment requireth, the receiving, observing, and keeping pure and entire all such religious Worship and Ordinances, as God hath appointed in his Word.", "answer_with_proofs": "The second Commandment requireth, the receiving, observing, and keeping pure and entire all such religious Worship and Ordinances, as God hath appointed in his Word[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Deut.32.46", "osis": ["Deut.32.46"]}, {"raw": "Matt.28.20", "osis": ["Matt.28.20"]}, {"raw": "Acts.2.42", "osis": ["Acts.2.42"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "56", "sort_key": 56, "question": "What is forbidden in the second Commandment?", "answer": "The second Commandment forbiddeth the worshipping of God by Images, or any other Way not appointed in his Word.", "answer_with_proofs": "The second Commandment forbiddeth the worshipping of God by Images[1], or any other Way not appointed in his Word[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Deut.4.15-Deut.4.19", "osis": ["Deut.4.15-Deut.4.19"]}, {"raw": "Exod.32.5,Exod.32.8", "osis": ["Exod.32.5", "Exod.32.8"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Deut.12.31-Deut.12.32", "osis": ["Deut.12.31-Deut.12.32"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "57", "sort_key": 57, "question": "What are the Reasons annexed to the second Commandment?", "answer": "The Reasons annexed to the second Commandment are, God's Sovereignty over us, his Propriety in us, and the Zeal he hath to his own Worship.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Reasons annexed to the second Commandment are, God's Sovereignty over us[1], his Propriety in us[2], and the Zeal he hath to his own Worship[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.95.2-Ps.95.3,Ps.95.6", "osis": ["Ps.95.2-Ps.95.3", "Ps.95.6"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.45.11", "osis": ["Ps.45.11"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.34.13-Exod.34.14", "osis": ["Exod.34.13-Exod.34.14"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "58", "sort_key": 58, "question": "Which is the third Commandment?", "answer": "The third Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain, For the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his Name in vain\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The third Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain, For the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his Name in vain\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.7", "osis": ["Exod.20.7"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "59", "sort_key": 59, "question": "What is required in the third Commandment?", "answer": null, "answer_with_proofs": "The third Commandment requireth, the Holy and Reverent Use of God's Names[1], Titles[2], Attributes[3], Ordinances[4], Word[5], and Works[6].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.9", "osis": ["Matt.6.9"]}, {"raw": "Deut.28.58", "osis": ["Deut.28.58"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.68.4", "osis": ["Ps.68.4"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Rev.15.3-Rev.15.4", "osis": ["Rev.15.3-Rev.15.4"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Mal.1.11,Mal.1.14", "osis": ["Mal.1.11", "Mal.1.14"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.138.1-Ps.138.2", "osis": ["Ps.138.1-Ps.138.2"]}]}, {"id": 6, "references": [{"raw": "Job.36.24", "osis": ["Job.36.24"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "60", "sort_key": 60, "question": "What is forbidden in the third Commandment?", "answer": null, "answer_with_proofs": "The third Commandment forbiddeth all profaning and abusing of any thing, whereby God makes himself known[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Mal.1.6-Mal.1.7,Mal.1.12", "osis": ["Mal.1.6-Mal.1.7", "Mal.1.12"]}, {"raw": "Mal.2.2", "osis": ["Mal.2.2"]}, {"raw": "Mal.3.14", "osis": ["Mal.3.14"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "61", "sort_key": 61, "question": "What is the Reason annexed to the third Commandment?", "answer": "The Reason annexed to the third Commandment, is, that however the breakers of this Commandment may escape Punishment from Men, yet the Lord our God will not suffer them to escape his Righteous Judgment.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Reason annexed to the third Commandment, is, that however the breakers of this Commandment may escape Punishment from Men, yet the Lord our God will not suffer them to escape his Righteous Judgment[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Sam.2.12,1Sam.2.17,1Sam.2.22,1Sam.2.24,1Sam.2.29", "osis": ["1Sam.2.12", "1Sam.2.17", "1Sam.2.22", "1Sam.2.24", "1Sam.2.29"]}, {"raw": "1Sam.3.13", "osis": ["1Sam.3.13"]}, {"raw": "Deut.28.58-Deut.28.59", "osis": ["Deut.28.58-Deut.28.59"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "62", "sort_key": 62, "question": "Which is the fourth Commandment?", "answer": "The fourth Commandment is, \"Remember the Sabbath Day to keep it holy: Six Days shalt thou labour, and do all thy Work; but the Seventh Day is the Sabbath of the LORD thy God, in it thou shalt not do any Work, thou, nor thy Son, nor thy Daughter, thy Man-servant, nov thy Maid-servant, nor thy Cattel, nor the Stranger that is within thy Gates: For in six Days the LORD made Heaven and Earth, the Sea, and all that in them is, and rested the Seventh Day; wherefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath Day, and hallowed it\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The fourth Commandment is, \"Remember the Sabbath Day to keep it holy: Six Days shalt thou labour, and do all thy Work; but the Seventh Day is the Sabbath of the LORD thy God, in it thou shalt not do any Work, thou, nor thy Son, nor thy Daughter, thy Man-servant, nov thy Maid-servant, nor thy Cattel, nor the Stranger that is within thy Gates: For in six Days the LORD made Heaven and Earth, the Sea, and all that in them is, and rested the Seventh Day; wherefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath Day, and hallowed it\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.8-Exod.20.11", "osis": ["Exod.20.8-Exod.20.11"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "63", "sort_key": 63, "question": "What is required in the fourth Commandment?", "answer": "The fourth Commandment requireth, the keeping Holy to God one whole Day in Seven, to be a Sabbath to himself", "answer_with_proofs": "The fourth Commandment requireth, the keeping Holy to God one whole Day in Seven, to be a Sabbath to himself[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.8-Exod.20.11", "osis": ["Exod.20.8-Exod.20.11"]}, {"raw": "Deut.5.12-Deut.5.14", "osis": ["Deut.5.12-Deut.5.14"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "64", "sort_key": 64, "question": "Which Day of the Seven hath God appointed to be the Weekly Sabbath?", "answer": "Before the Refurrection of Christ, God appointed the Seventh Day of the Week to be the Weekly Sabbath, and the First Day of the Week ever since, to continue to the End of the World, which is the Christian Sabbath.", "answer_with_proofs": "Before the Refurrection of Christ, God appointed the Seventh Day of the Week to be the Weekly Sabbath[1], and the First Day of the Week ever since, to continue to the End of the World, which is the Christian Sabbath[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.8-Exod.20.11", "osis": ["Exod.20.8-Exod.20.11"]}, {"raw": "Deut.5.12-Deut.5.14", "osis": ["Deut.5.12-Deut.5.14"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.118.24", "osis": ["Ps.118.24"]}, {"raw": "Matt.28.1", "osis": ["Matt.28.1"]}, {"raw": "Mark.2.27-Mark.2.28", "osis": ["Mark.2.27-Mark.2.28"]}, {"raw": "Mark.16.2", "osis": ["Mark.16.2"]}, {"raw": "Luke.24.1,Luke.24.30-Luke.24.36", "osis": ["Luke.24.1", "Luke.24.30-Luke.24.36"]}, {"raw": "John.20.1,John.20.19-John.20.21,John.20.26", "osis": ["John.20.1", "John.20.19-John.20.21", "John.20.26"]}, {"raw": "Acts.1.3", "osis": ["Acts.1.3"]}, {"raw": "Acts.2.1-Acts.2.2", "osis": ["Acts.2.1-Acts.2.2"]}, {"raw": "Acts.20.7", "osis": ["Acts.20.7"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.16.1-1Cor.16.2", "osis": ["1Cor.16.1-1Cor.16.2"]}, {"raw": "Rev.1.10", "osis": ["Rev.1.10"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "65", "sort_key": 65, "question": "How is the Sabbath to be sanctified?", "answer": "The Sabbath is to be sanctified by a holy Resting all that Day, even from such worldly Employments and Recreations as are lawful on other Days; and spending the whole Time in the Public and Private Exercises of God's Worship, except so much as is to be taken up in the Works of Necessity and Mercy.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Sabbath is to be sanctified by a holy Resting all that Day[1], even from such worldly Employments and Recreations as are lawful on other Days[2]; and spending the whole Time in the Public and Private Exercises of God's Worship[3], except so much as is to be taken up in the Works of Necessity and Mercy[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.8,Exod.20.10", "osis": ["Exod.20.8", "Exod.20.10"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.16.25-Exod.16.28", "osis": ["Exod.16.25-Exod.16.28"]}, {"raw": "Neh.13.15-Neh.13.19,Neh.13.21-Neh.13.22", "osis": ["Neh.13.15-Neh.13.19", "Neh.13.21-Neh.13.22"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.14.16", "osis": ["Luke.14.16"]}, {"raw": "Acts.20.7", "osis": ["Acts.20.7"]}, {"raw": "Ps.92", "osis": ["Ps.92"]}, {"raw": "Isa.66.23", "osis": ["Isa.66.23"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.12.1-Matt.12.13", "osis": ["Matt.12.1-Matt.12.13"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "66", "sort_key": 66, "question": "What is forbidden in the fourth Commandment?", "answer": "The fourth Commandment forbiddeth the Omission or careless Performance of the Duties required, and the profaning the Day by Idleness, or doing that which is in it self sinful; or by unnecessary Thoughts, Words, or Works about worldly Employments or Recreations.", "answer_with_proofs": "The fourth Commandment forbiddeth the Omission or careless Performance of the Duties required[1], and the profaning the Day by Idleness[2], or doing that which is in it self sinful[3]; or by unnecessary Thoughts, Words, or Works about worldly Employments or Recreations[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Ezek.22.26", "osis": ["Ezek.22.26"]}, {"raw": "Amos.8.5", "osis": ["Amos.8.5"]}, {"raw": "Mal.1.13", "osis": ["Mal.1.13"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.20.7,Acts.20.9", "osis": ["Acts.20.7", "Acts.20.9"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Ezek.23.38", "osis": ["Ezek.23.38"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Jer.17.24-Jer.17.27", "osis": ["Jer.17.24-Jer.17.27"]}, {"raw": "Isa.58.13", "osis": ["Isa.58.13"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "67", "sort_key": 67, "question": "What are the Reasons annexed to the fourth Commandment?", "answer": "The Reasons annexed to the fourth Commandment, are God's allowing us six Days of the Week for our own lawful Employments, his challenging a special Propriety in a Seventh, his own Example, and his blessing the Sabbath Day.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Reasons annexed to the fourth Commandment, are God's allowing us six Days of the Week for our own lawful Employments[1], his challenging a special Propriety in a Seventh, his own Example, and his blessing the Sabbath Day[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.9", "osis": ["Exod.20.9"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.11", "osis": ["Exod.20.11"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "68", "sort_key": 68, "question": "Which is the fifth Commandment?", "answer": "The fifth Commandment is, \"Honour thy Father and thy Mother; that thy Days may be long upon the Land which the LORD thy God give it thee.\"", "answer_with_proofs": "The fifth Commandment is, \"Honour thy Father and thy Mother; that thy Days may be long upon the Land which the LORD thy God give it thee\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.12", "osis": ["Exod.20.12"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "69", "sort_key": 69, "question": "What is required in the fifth Commandment?", "answer": "The fifth Commandment requireth the preserving the Honour, and performing the Duties belonging to every one in their several Places and Relations, as Superiours, Inferiors, or Equals.", "answer_with_proofs": "The fifth Commandment requireth the preserving the Honour, and performing the Duties belonging to every one in their several Places and Relations, as Superiours[1], Inferiors[2], or Equals[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.5.21", "osis": ["Eph.5.21"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "1Pet.2.17", "osis": ["1Pet.2.17"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.12.10", "osis": ["Rom.12.10"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "70", "sort_key": 70, "question": "What is forbidden in the fifth Commandment?", "answer": "The fifth Commandment forbiddeth the neglecting of, or doing any thing against the Honor and Duty which belongeth to every one in their several Places and Relations.", "answer_with_proofs": "The fifth Commandment forbiddeth the neglecting of, or doing any thing against the Honor and Duty which belongeth to every one in their several Places and Relations[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.15.4-Matt.15.6", "osis": ["Matt.15.4-Matt.15.6"]}, {"raw": "Ezek.34.2-Ezek.34.4", "osis": ["Ezek.34.2-Ezek.34.4"]}, {"raw": "Rom.13.8", "osis": ["Rom.13.8"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "71", "sort_key": 71, "question": "What is the Reason annexed to the fifth Commandment?", "answer": "The reason annexed to the fifth Commandment, is a Promise of long Life and Prosperity (as far as it shall serve for God's Glory, and their own Good) to all such as keep this Commandment.", "answer_with_proofs": "The reason annexed to the fifth Commandment, is a Promise of long Life and Prosperity (as far as it shall serve for God's Glory, and their own Good) to all such as keep this Commandment[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Deut.5.16", "osis": ["Deut.5.16"]}, {"raw": "Eph.6.2-Eph.6.3", "osis": ["Eph.6.2-Eph.6.3"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "72", "sort_key": 72, "question": "What is the sixth Commandment?", "answer": "The sixth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not kill\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The sixth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not kill\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.13", "osis": ["Exod.20.13"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "73", "sort_key": 73, "question": "What is required in the sixth Commandment?", "answer": "The sixth Commandment requireth all lawful Endeavors to preserve our own Life, and the Life of others.", "answer_with_proofs": "The sixth Commandment requireth all lawful Endeavors to preserve our own Life[1], and the Life of others[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.5.28-Eph.5.29", "osis": ["Eph.5.28-Eph.5.29"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "1Kgs.18.4", "osis": ["1Kgs.18.4"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "74", "sort_key": 74, "question": "What is forbidden in the sixth Commandment?", "answer": "The sixth Commandment absolutely forbiddeth the taking away of our own Life; or the Life of our Neighbor unjustly, or whatsoever tendeth thereunto.", "answer_with_proofs": "The sixth Commandment absolutely forbiddeth the taking away of our own Life; or the Life of our Neighbor unjustly, or whatsoever tendeth thereunto[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.16.28", "osis": ["Acts.16.28"]}, {"raw": "Gen.9.6", "osis": ["Gen.9.6"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "75", "sort_key": 75, "question": "Which is the seventh Commandment?", "answer": "The seventh Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not commit adultery\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The seventh Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not commit adultery\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.14", "osis": ["Exod.20.14"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "76", "sort_key": 76, "question": "What is required in the seventh Commandment?", "answer": "The seventh Commandment requireth the Preservation of our own, and out Neighbor's Chastity, in Heart, Speech, and Behavior.", "answer_with_proofs": "The seventh Commandment requireth the Preservation of our own, and out Neighbor's Chastity, in Heart, Speech, and Behavior[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.7.2-1Cor.7.3,1Cor.7.5,1Cor.7.34,1Cor.7.36", "osis": ["1Cor.7.2-1Cor.7.3", "1Cor.7.5", "1Cor.7.34", "1Cor.7.36"]}, {"raw": "Col.4.6", "osis": ["Col.4.6"]}, {"raw": "1Pet.3.2", "osis": ["1Pet.3.2"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "77", "sort_key": 77, "question": "What is forbidden in the seventh Commandment?", "answer": "The seventh Commandment forbiddeth all unchast Thoughts, Words and Actions.", "answer_with_proofs": "The seventh Commandment forbiddeth all unchast Thoughts, Words and Actions[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.15.19", "osis": ["Matt.15.19"]}, {"raw": "Matt.5.28", "osis": ["Matt.5.28"]}, {"raw": "Eph.5.3-Eph.5.4", "osis": ["Eph.5.3-Eph.5.4"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "78", "sort_key": 78, "question": "Which is the eighth Commandment?", "answer": "The eighth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not steal\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The eighth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not steal\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.15", "osis": ["Exod.20.15"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "79", "sort_key": 79, "question": "What is required in the eighth Commandment?", "answer": "The eighth Commandment requireth the lawful procuring, and furthering the Wealth and outward Estate of our selves, and others.", "answer_with_proofs": "The eighth Commandment requireth the lawful procuring, and furthering the Wealth and outward Estate of our selves, and others[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.30.30", "osis": ["Gen.30.30"]}, {"raw": "1Tim.5.8", "osis": ["1Tim.5.8"]}, {"raw": "Lev.25.35", "osis": ["Lev.25.35"]}, {"raw": "Deut.22.1-Deut.22.5", "osis": ["Deut.22.1-Deut.22.5"]}, {"raw": "Exod.23.4-Exod.23.5", "osis": ["Exod.23.4-Exod.23.5"]}, {"raw": "Gen.47.14,Gen.47.20", "osis": ["Gen.47.14", "Gen.47.20"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "80", "sort_key": 80, "question": "What is forbidden in the eighth Commandment?", "answer": "The eighth Commandment forbiddeth whatsoever doth, or may, unjustly hinder our own, or our Neighbour's Wealth, or outward Estate.", "answer_with_proofs": "The eighth Commandment forbiddeth whatsoever doth, or may, unjustly hinder our own, or our Neighbour's Wealth, or outward Estate[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Prov.21.17", "osis": ["Prov.21.17"]}, {"raw": "Prov.23.20-Prov.23.21", "osis": ["Prov.23.20-Prov.23.21"]}, {"raw": "Prov.28.19", "osis": ["Prov.28.19"]}, {"raw": "Eph.4.28", "osis": ["Eph.4.28"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "81", "sort_key": 81, "question": "Which is the ninth Commandment?", "answer": "The ninth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not bear false Witness against thy Neighbour\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The ninth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not bear false Witness against thy Neighbour\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.16", "osis": ["Exod.20.16"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "82", "sort_key": 82, "question": "What is required in the ninth Commandment?", "answer": "The ninth Commandment requireth the maintaining and promoting of Truth between Man and Man, and of our own and our Neighbor's good Name, especially in Witness-bearing.", "answer_with_proofs": "The ninth Commandment requireth the maintaining and promoting of Truth between Man and Man[1], and of our own and our Neighbor's good Name[2], especially in Witness-bearing[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Zech.8.16", "osis": ["Zech.8.16"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "3John.1.12", "osis": ["3John.1.12"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Prov.14.5,Prov.14.25", "osis": ["Prov.14.5", "Prov.14.25"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "83", "sort_key": 83, "question": "What is forbidden in the ninth Commandment?", "answer": "The ninth Commandment forbiddeth whatsoever is prejudicial to Truth, or injurious to our own or our Neighbor's good name.", "answer_with_proofs": "The ninth Commandment forbiddeth whatsoever is prejudicial to Truth, or injurious to our own or our Neighbor's good name[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Sam.17.28", "osis": ["1Sam.17.28"]}, {"raw": "Lev.19.16", "osis": ["Lev.19.16"]}, {"raw": "Ps.15.3", "osis": ["Ps.15.3"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "84", "sort_key": 84, "question": "Which is the tenth Commandment?", "answer": "The tenth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not covet thy Neighbor's House, that shalt not covet thy Neighbor's Wife, nor his Man-servant, nor his Maid-servant, nor his Ox, nor his Ass, nor any thing that is thy Neighbor's\".", "answer_with_proofs": "The tenth Commandment is, \"Thou shalt not covet thy Neighbor's House, that shalt not covet thy Neighbor's Wife, nor his Man-servant, nor his Maid-servant, nor his Ox, nor his Ass, nor any thing that is thy Neighbor's\"[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Exod.20.17", "osis": ["Exod.20.17"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "85", "sort_key": 85, "question": "What is required in the tenth Commandment?", "answer": "The tenth Commandment requireth the full Contentment with our own Condition, with a right and charitable frame of Spirit toward our Neighbor, and all that is his.", "answer_with_proofs": "The tenth Commandment requireth the full Contentment with our own Condition[1], with a right and charitable frame of Spirit toward our Neighbor, and all that is his[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.13.5", "osis": ["Heb.13.5"]}, {"raw": "1Tim.6.6", "osis": ["1Tim.6.6"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Job.31.29", "osis": ["Job.31.29"]}, {"raw": "Rom.12.15", "osis": ["Rom.12.15"]}, {"raw": "1Tim.1.5", "osis": ["1Tim.1.5"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.13.4-1Cor.13.7", "osis": ["1Cor.13.4-1Cor.13.7"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "86", "sort_key": 86, "question": "What is forbidden in the tenth Commandment?", "answer": "The tenth Commandment forbiddeth all Discontentment with our own Estate; envying or grieving at the Good of our Neighbor, and all inordinate Motions and Affections to any thing that is his.", "answer_with_proofs": "The tenth Commandment forbiddeth all Discontentment with our own Estate[1]; envying or grieving at the Good of our Neighbor[2], and all inordinate Motions and Affections to any thing that is his[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Kgs.21.4", "osis": ["1Kgs.21.4"]}, {"raw": "Esth.5.13", "osis": ["Esth.5.13"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.10.10", "osis": ["1Cor.10.10"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Gal.5.26", "osis": ["Gal.5.26"]}, {"raw": "Jas.3.14,Jas.3.16", "osis": ["Jas.3.14", "Jas.3.16"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.7.7-Rom.7.8", "osis": ["Rom.7.7-Rom.7.8"]}, {"raw": "Rom.13.9", "osis": ["Rom.13.9"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "87", "sort_key": 87, "question": "Is any Man able perfectly to keep the Commandments of God?", "answer": "No meer Man since the Fall, is able in this Life, perfectly to keep the Commandments of God, but doth daily break them, in Thought, Work, or Deed.", "answer_with_proofs": "No meer Man since the Fall, is able in this Life, perfectly to keep the Commandments of God[1], but doth daily break them, in Thought, Work, or Deed[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Eccl.7.20", "osis": ["Eccl.7.20"]}, {"raw": "1John.1.8,1John.1.10", "osis": ["1John.1.8", "1John.1.10"]}, {"raw": "Gal.5.17", "osis": ["Gal.5.17"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Gen.6.5", "osis": ["Gen.6.5"]}, {"raw": "Gen.8.21", "osis": ["Gen.8.21"]}, {"raw": "Rom.3.9-Rom.3.21", "osis": ["Rom.3.9-Rom.3.21"]}, {"raw": "Jas.3.2-Jas.3.13", "osis": ["Jas.3.2-Jas.3.13"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "88", "sort_key": 88, "question": "Are all Transgressions of the Law equally heinous?", "answer": "Some Sins in themselves, and by reason of several Aggravations, are more heinous in the sight of God than others.", "answer_with_proofs": "Some Sins in themselves, and by reason of several Aggravations, are more heinous in the sight of God than others[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Ezek.8.6,Ezek.8.13,Ezek.8.15", "osis": ["Ezek.8.6", "Ezek.8.13", "Ezek.8.15"]}, {"raw": "1John.5.16", "osis": ["1John.5.16"]}, {"raw": "Ps.78.17,Ps.78.32,Ps.78.56", "osis": ["Ps.78.17", "Ps.78.32", "Ps.78.56"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "89", "sort_key": 89, "question": "What doth every Sin deserve?", "answer": "Every Sin deserveth God's Wrath and Curse, both in this Life, and that which is to come.", "answer_with_proofs": "Every Sin deserveth God's Wrath and Curse, both in this Life, and that which is to come[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Eph.5.6", "osis": ["Eph.5.6"]}, {"raw": "Gal.3.10", "osis": ["Gal.3.10"]}, {"raw": "Lam.3.39", "osis": ["Lam.3.39"]}, {"raw": "Matt.25.41", "osis": ["Matt.25.41"]}, {"raw": "Rom.6.23", "osis": ["Rom.6.23"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "90", "sort_key": 90, "question": "What doth God require of us, that we may escape his Wrath and Curse, due to us for Sin?", "answer": "To escape the Wrath and Curse of God due to us for Sin, God requireth of us Faith in Jesus Christ, Repentance unto Life, with the diligent use all the outward Means, whereby Christ communicateth to us the Benefits of Redemption.", "answer_with_proofs": "To escape the Wrath and Curse of God due to us for Sin, God requireth of us Faith in Jesus Christ, Repentance unto Life[1], with the diligent use all the outward Means, whereby Christ communicateth to us the Benefits of Redemption[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.20.21", "osis": ["Acts.20.21"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Prov.2.1-Prov.2.6", "osis": ["Prov.2.1-Prov.2.6"]}, {"raw": "Prov.8.33-Prov.8.36", "osis": ["Prov.8.33-Prov.8.36"]}, {"raw": "Isa.55.2-Isa.55.3", "osis": ["Isa.55.2-Isa.55.3"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "91", "sort_key": 91, "question": "What is Faith in Jesus Christ?", "answer": "Faith in Jesus Christ is a saving Grace, whereby we receive, and rest upon him alone for Salvation, as he is offered to us in the Gospel.", "answer_with_proofs": "Faith in Jesus Christ is a saving Grace[1], whereby we receive, and rest upon him alone for Salvation, as he is offered to us in the Gospel[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.10.39", "osis": ["Heb.10.39"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "John.1.12", "osis": ["John.1.12"]}, {"raw": "Isa.26.3-Isa.26.4", "osis": ["Isa.26.3-Isa.26.4"]}, {"raw": "Phil.3.9", "osis": ["Phil.3.9"]}, {"raw": "Gal.2.16", "osis": ["Gal.2.16"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "92", "sort_key": 92, "question": "What is Repentance unto Life?", "answer": "Repentance unto Life is a saving Grace, whereby a Sinner, out of a true Sense of his Sin, and Apprehension of the Mercy of God in Christ, doth, with grief and hatred of his Sin, turn from it unto God, with full Purpose of, and Endeavor after, new Obedience.", "answer_with_proofs": "Repentance unto Life is a saving Grace[1], whereby a Sinner, out of a true Sense of his Sin[2], and Apprehension of the Mercy of God in Christ[3], doth, with grief and hatred of his Sin, turn from it unto God[4], with full Purpose of, and Endeavor after, new Obedience[5].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.11.28", "osis": ["Acts.11.28"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.2.37-Acts.2.38", "osis": ["Acts.2.37-Acts.2.38"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Joel.2.12", "osis": ["Joel.2.12"]}, {"raw": "Jer.3.22", "osis": ["Jer.3.22"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Jer.31.18-Jer.31.19", "osis": ["Jer.31.18-Jer.31.19"]}, {"raw": "Ezek.36.31", "osis": ["Ezek.36.31"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "2Cor.7.11", "osis": ["2Cor.7.11"]}, {"raw": "Isa.1.16-Isa.1.17", "osis": ["Isa.1.16-Isa.1.17"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "93", "sort_key": 93, "question": "What are the outward Means, whereby Christ communicateth to us the Benefits of Redemption?", "answer": "The outward in ordinary Means, whereby Christ communicateth to us the Benefits of Redemption, are his Ordinances, especially the Word, Baptism, the Lord's Supper, and Prayer; all which Means are made effectual to the Elect for Salvation.", "answer_with_proofs": "The outward in ordinary Means, whereby Christ communicateth to us the Benefits of Redemption, are his Ordinances, especially the Word, Baptism, the Lord's Supper, and Prayer; all which Means are made effectual to the Elect for Salvation[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.28.19-Matt.28.20", "osis": ["Matt.28.19-Matt.28.20"]}, {"raw": "Acts.2.42,Acts.2.46-Acts.2.47", "osis": ["Acts.2.42", "Acts.2.46-Acts.2.47"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "94", "sort_key": 94, "question": "How is the Word made effectual to Salvation?", "answer": "The Spirit of God maketh the Reading, but especially the Preaching of the Word, an effectual Means of convincing and converting Sinners; and of building them up in Holiness and Comfort through Faith unto Salvation.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Spirit of God maketh the Reading, but especially the Preaching of the Word, an effectual Means of convincing and converting Sinners; and of building them up in Holiness and Comfort through Faith unto Salvation[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Neh.8.8", "osis": ["Neh.8.8"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.14.24-1Cor.14.25", "osis": ["1Cor.14.24-1Cor.14.25"]}, {"raw": "Acts.26.18", "osis": ["Acts.26.18"]}, {"raw": "Ps.19.8", "osis": ["Ps.19.8"]}, {"raw": "Acts.20.32", "osis": ["Acts.20.32"]}, {"raw": "Rom.15.4", "osis": ["Rom.15.4"]}, {"raw": "1Tim.3.15-1Tim.3.16", "osis": ["1Tim.3.15-1Tim.3.16"]}, {"raw": "Rom.10.13-Rom.10.17", "osis": ["Rom.10.13-Rom.10.17"]}, {"raw": "Rom.1.16", "osis": ["Rom.1.16"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "95", "sort_key": 95, "question": "How is the Word to be read and heard, that it may become effectual to Salvation?", "answer": "That the Word may become effectual to Salvation, we must attend thereunto with Diligence, Preparation, and Prayer; receive it with Faith and Love, lay it up in our Hearts, and practice it in our Lives.", "answer_with_proofs": "That the Word may become effectual to Salvation, we must attend thereunto with Diligence[1], Preparation[2], and Prayer[3]; receive it with Faith and Love[4], lay it up in our Hearts[5], and practice it in our Lives[6].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Prov.8.34", "osis": ["Prov.8.34"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "1Pet.2.1-1Pet.2.2", "osis": ["1Pet.2.1-1Pet.2.2"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.119.18", "osis": ["Ps.119.18"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Heb.4.2", "osis": ["Heb.4.2"]}, {"raw": "2Thess.2.10", "osis": ["2Thess.2.10"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.119.11", "osis": ["Ps.119.11"]}]}, {"id": 6, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.8.15", "osis": ["Luke.8.15"]}, {"raw": "Jas.1.25", "osis": ["Jas.1.25"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "96", "sort_key": 96, "question": "How do Baptism and the Lord's Supper, become effectual Means of Salvation?", "answer": "Baptism and the Lord's Supper become effectual Means of Salvation, not for any Virtue in them, or in him that doth administer them, but only by the Blessing of Christ, and the working of the Spirit in those that by Faith received them.", "answer_with_proofs": "Baptism and the Lord's Supper become effectual Means of Salvation, not for any Virtue in them, or in him that doth administer them, but only by the Blessing of Christ[1], and the working of the Spirit in those that by Faith received them[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Pet.3.21", "osis": ["1Pet.3.21"]}, {"raw": "Matt.3.11", "osis": ["Matt.3.11"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.3.6-1Cor.3.7", "osis": ["1Cor.3.6-1Cor.3.7"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.12.13", "osis": ["1Cor.12.13"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "97", "sort_key": 97, "question": "What is Baptism?", "answer": "Baptism is an Ordinance of the New Testament instituted by Jesus Christ, to be unto the Party baptised, a Sign of his Fellowship with him, in his Death, Burial, and Resurrection; of his being ingrafted into him; of Remission of Sins; and of his giving up himself unto God through Jesus Christ, to live and walk in newness of Life.", "answer_with_proofs": "Baptism is an Ordinance of the New Testament instituted by Jesus Christ[1], to be unto the Party baptised, a Sign of his Fellowship with him, in his Death, Burial, and Resurrection; of his being ingrafted into him[2]; of Remission of Sins[3]; and of his giving up himself unto God through Jesus Christ, to live and walk in newness of Life[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.28.19", "osis": ["Matt.28.19"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.6.3-Rom.6.5", "osis": ["Rom.6.3-Rom.6.5"]}, {"raw": "Col.2.12", "osis": ["Col.2.12"]}, {"raw": "Gal.3.27", "osis": ["Gal.3.27"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Mark.1.4", "osis": ["Mark.1.4"]}, {"raw": "Acts.2.38", "osis": ["Acts.2.38"]}, {"raw": "Acts.22.16", "osis": ["Acts.22.16"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.6.3-Rom.6.4", "osis": ["Rom.6.3-Rom.6.4"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "98", "sort_key": 98, "question": "To whom is Baptism to be administered?", "answer": "Baptism is to be administered to all those, who actually profess Repentance toward God, Faith in, and Obedience to our Lord Jesus Christ, and to none other.", "answer_with_proofs": "Baptism is to be administered to all those, who actually profess Repentance toward God, Faith in, and Obedience to our Lord Jesus Christ, and to none other[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.3.6", "osis": ["Matt.3.6"]}, {"raw": "Matt.28.19", "osis": ["Matt.28.19"]}, {"raw": "Mark.16.16", "osis": ["Mark.16.16"]}, {"raw": "Acts.2.37-Acts.2.38", "osis": ["Acts.2.37-Acts.2.38"]}, {"raw": "Acts.8.36-Acts.8.38", "osis": ["Acts.8.36-Acts.8.38"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "99", "sort_key": 99, "question": "Are the Infants of such as are Professing Believers to be baptized?", "answer": "The Infants of such as are professing Believers are not to be baptized, because there is neither Command, or Example in the Holy Scriptures, or certain Consequence from them to baptize such.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Infants of such as are professing Believers are not to be baptized, because there is neither Command, or Example in the Holy Scriptures, or certain Consequence from them to baptize such.", "proofs": [], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "100", "sort_key": 100, "question": "How is Baptism rightly administered?", "answer": "Baptism is rightly administered, by Immersion, wore dipping the whole Body of the Party in Water, into the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, according to Christ's Institution, and the Practice of the Apostles; and not by the sprinkling or pouring of Water, or dipping some Part of the Body, after the Tradition of Men.", "answer_with_proofs": "Baptism is rightly administered, by Immersion, wore dipping the whole Body of the Party in Water, into the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, according to Christ's Institution, and the Practice of the Apostles[1]; and not by the sprinkling or pouring of Water, or dipping some Part of the Body, after the Tradition of Men.", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.3.16", "osis": ["Matt.3.16"]}, {"raw": "John.3.23", "osis": ["John.3.23"]}, {"raw": "Matt.28.19-Matt.28.20", "osis": ["Matt.28.19-Matt.28.20"]}, {"raw": "Acts.8.38", "osis": ["Acts.8.38"]}, {"raw": "Acts.10.48", "osis": ["Acts.10.48"]}, {"raw": "Rom.6.4", "osis": ["Rom.6.4"]}, {"raw": "Col.2.12", "osis": ["Col.2.12"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "101", "sort_key": 101, "question": "What is the Duty of such who are rightly baptized?", "answer": "It is the Duty of such who are rightly baptized, to give up themselves to some particular and orderly Church of Jesus Christ, that they may walk in all the Commandments and Ordinances of the Lord blameless.", "answer_with_proofs": "It is the Duty of such who are rightly baptized, to give up themselves to some particular and orderly Church of Jesus Christ, that they may walk in all the Commandments and Ordinances of the Lord blameless[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.2.41-Acts.2.42", "osis": ["Acts.2.41-Acts.2.42"]}, {"raw": "Acts.5.13-Acts.5.14", "osis": ["Acts.5.13-Acts.5.14"]}, {"raw": "Acts.9.26", "osis": ["Acts.9.26"]}, {"raw": "1Pet.2.5", "osis": ["1Pet.2.5"]}, {"raw": "Luke.1.6", "osis": ["Luke.1.6"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "102", "sort_key": 102, "question": "What is the Lord's Supper?", "answer": "The Lord's Supper is an Ordinance of the New Testament instituted by Jesus Christ; wherein by giving and receiving Bread and Wine, according to his Appointment, his Death is shewed forth; and the worthy Receivers are, not after a Corporal and Carnal manner, but by Faith, made Partakers of his Body and Blood, with all his Benefits, to their spiritual Nourishment, and growth in Grace.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Lord's Supper is an Ordinance of the New Testament instituted by Jesus Christ; wherein by giving and receiving Bread and Wine, according to his Appointment, his Death is shewed forth; and the worthy Receivers are, not after a Corporal and Carnal manner, but by Faith, made Partakers of his Body and Blood, with all his Benefits, to their spiritual Nourishment, and growth in Grace[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.26.26-Matt.26.28", "osis": ["Matt.26.26-Matt.26.28"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.11.23-1Cor.11.26", "osis": ["1Cor.11.23-1Cor.11.26"]}, {"raw": "1Cor.10.16", "osis": ["1Cor.10.16"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "103", "sort_key": 103, "question": "Who are the proper Subjects of this Ordinance?", "answer": "They who have been baptized upon a personal Profession of their Faith in Jesus Christ, and Repentance from dead Works.", "answer_with_proofs": "They who have been baptized upon a personal Profession of their Faith in Jesus Christ, and Repentance from dead Works[1].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.2.41-Acts.2.42", "osis": ["Acts.2.41-Acts.2.42"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "104", "sort_key": 104, "question": "What is required to the worthy receiving of the Lord's Supper?", "answer": "It is required of them that would worthily partake of the Lord's Supper, that they examine themselves, of their Knowledge to discern the Lord's Body, of their Faith to feed upon him, of their Repentance, Love, and new Obedience; lest coming unworthily, they eat and drink Judgment to themselves.", "answer_with_proofs": "It is required of them that would worthily partake of the Lord's Supper, that they examine themselves, of their Knowledge to discern the Lord's Body[1], of their Faith to feed upon him[2], of their Repentance[3], Love[4], and new Obedience[5]; lest coming unworthily, they eat and drink Judgment to themselves[6].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.11.28-1Cor.11.29", "osis": ["1Cor.11.28-1Cor.11.29"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "2Cor.13.5", "osis": ["2Cor.13.5"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.11.31", "osis": ["1Cor.11.31"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.10.16-1Cor.10.17", "osis": ["1Cor.10.16-1Cor.10.17"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.5.7-1Cor.5.8", "osis": ["1Cor.5.7-1Cor.5.8"]}]}, {"id": 6, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.11.28-1Cor.11.29", "osis": ["1Cor.11.28-1Cor.11.29"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "105", "sort_key": 105, "question": "What is Prayer?", "answer": "Prayer is an offering up our Desires to God, by the Assistance of the Holy Spirit, for things agreeable to his Will, in the Name of Christ believing, with Confession of our Sins, and thankful Acknowledgment of his Mercies.", "answer_with_proofs": "Prayer is an offering up our Desires to God[1], by the Assistance of the Holy Spirit[2], for things agreeable to his Will[3], in the Name of Christ[4] believing[5], with Confession of our Sins[6], and thankful Acknowledgment of his Mercies[7].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.62.8", "osis": ["Ps.62.8"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.8.26", "osis": ["Rom.8.26"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "1John.5.14", "osis": ["1John.5.14"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "John.16.23", "osis": ["John.16.23"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.21.22", "osis": ["Matt.21.22"]}, {"raw": "Jas.1.6", "osis": ["Jas.1.6"]}]}, {"id": 6, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.32.5-Ps.32.6", "osis": ["Ps.32.5-Ps.32.6"]}, {"raw": "Dan.9.4", "osis": ["Dan.9.4"]}]}, {"id": 7, "references": [{"raw": "Phil.4.6", "osis": ["Phil.4.6"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "106", "sort_key": 106, "question": "What Rule hath God given for our Direction in Prayer?", "answer": "The whole Word of God is of use to direct us in Prayer; but the special Rule of Direction is, that Prayer which Christ taught his Disciples, commonly called, The Lord's Prayer.", "answer_with_proofs": "The whole Word of God is of use to direct us in Prayer[1]; but the special Rule of Direction is, that Prayer which Christ taught his Disciples, commonly called, The Lord's Prayer[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "1John.5.14", "osis": ["1John.5.14"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Mark.6.9-Mark.6.13", "osis": ["Mark.6.9-Mark.6.13"]}, {"raw": "Luke.11.2-Luke.11.4", "osis": ["Luke.11.2-Luke.11.4"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "107", "sort_key": 107, "question": "What doth the Preface of the Lord's Prayer teach us?", "answer": "The Preface of the Lord's Prayer, which is, \"Our Father which art in Heaven,\" teacheth us to draw near to God with all holy Reverence and Confidence, as Children to a Father, able and ready to help us; and that we should pray with and for others.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Preface of the Lord's Prayer, which is, \"Our Father which art in Heaven[1],\" teacheth us to draw near to God with all holy Reverence and Confidence, as Children to a Father, able and ready to help us[2]; and that we should pray with and for others[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.9", "osis": ["Matt.6.9"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Rom.8.15", "osis": ["Rom.8.15"]}, {"raw": "Luke.11.13", "osis": ["Luke.11.13"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Acts.12.5", "osis": ["Acts.12.5"]}, {"raw": "1Tim.2.1-1Tim.2.2", "osis": ["1Tim.2.1-1Tim.2.2"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "108", "sort_key": 108, "question": "What do we pray for in the first Petition?", "answer": "In the first Petition, which is, \"Hallowed be thy Name,\" we pray, that God would enable us and others, to glorify him in all that, whereby he maketh himself known; and that he would dispose all things to his own Glory.", "answer_with_proofs": "In the first Petition, which is, \"Hallowed be thy Name[1],\" we pray, that God would enable us and others, to glorify him in all that, whereby he maketh himself known[2]; and that he would dispose all things to his own Glory[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.9", "osis": ["Matt.6.9"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.67.2-Ps.67.3", "osis": ["Ps.67.2-Ps.67.3"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.83", "osis": ["Ps.83"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "109", "sort_key": 109, "question": "What do we pray for in the Second Petition?", "answer": "In the second Petition, which is, \"Thy Kingdom come,\" we pray that Satan's Kingdom may be destroyed, and that the Kingdom of Grace may be advanced, our selves and others brought into it and kept in it, and that the Kingdom of Glory may be hastened.", "answer_with_proofs": "In the second Petition, which is, \"Thy Kingdom come[1],\" we pray that Satan's Kingdom may be destroyed[2], and that the Kingdom of Grace may be advanced[3], our selves and others brought into it and kept in it[4], and that the Kingdom of Glory may be hastened[5].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.10", "osis": ["Matt.6.10"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.68.1,Ps.68.18", "osis": ["Ps.68.1", "Ps.68.18"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Rev.12.10-Rev.12.11", "osis": ["Rev.12.10-Rev.12.11"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "2Thess.3.1", "osis": ["2Thess.3.1"]}, {"raw": "Rom.10.1", "osis": ["Rom.10.1"]}, {"raw": "John.17.19-John.17.20", "osis": ["John.17.19-John.17.20"]}]}, {"id": 5, "references": [{"raw": "Rev.22.20", "osis": ["Rev.22.20"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "110", "sort_key": 110, "question": "What do we pray for in the third Petition?", "answer": "In the third Petition, which is, \"Thy Will be done on Earth, as it is in Heaven,\" we pray, that God by his Grace would make us able and willing to know, obey, and submit to his Will in all things, as the Angels do in Heaven.", "answer_with_proofs": "In the third Petition, which is, \"Thy Will be done on Earth, as it is in Heaven[1],\" we pray, that God by his Grace would make us able and willing to know, obey, and submit to his Will in all things[2], as the Angels do in Heaven[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.10", "osis": ["Matt.6.10"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.67", "osis": ["Ps.67"]}, {"raw": "Ps.119.36", "osis": ["Ps.119.36"]}, {"raw": "Matt.26.39", "osis": ["Matt.26.39"]}, {"raw": "2Sam.15.25", "osis": ["2Sam.15.25"]}, {"raw": "Job.1.21", "osis": ["Job.1.21"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.103.20-Ps.103.21", "osis": ["Ps.103.20-Ps.103.21"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "111", "sort_key": 111, "question": "What do we pray for in the fourth Petition?", "answer": "In the fourth Petition, which is, \"Give us this Day our daily Bread,\" we pray, that of God's free Gift, we may receive a competent Portion of the good Things of this Life, and enjoy his Blessing with them.", "answer_with_proofs": "In the fourth Petition, which is, \"Give us this Day our daily Bread[1],\" we pray, that of God's free Gift, we may receive a competent Portion of the good Things of this Life, and enjoy his Blessing with them[2].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.11", "osis": ["Matt.6.11"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Prov.30.8-Prov.30.9", "osis": ["Prov.30.8-Prov.30.9"]}, {"raw": "Gen.28.20", "osis": ["Gen.28.20"]}, {"raw": "1Tim.4.4-1Tim.4.5", "osis": ["1Tim.4.4-1Tim.4.5"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "112", "sort_key": 112, "question": "What do we pray for in the fifth Petition?", "answer": "In the fifth Petition, which is, \"And forgive us our Debts as we forgive our Debtors,\" we pray, that God for Christ's sake would freely pardon all our Sins; which we are the rather encouraged to ask, because by his Grace we are enabled from the Heart to forgive others.", "answer_with_proofs": "In the fifth Petition, which is, \"And forgive us our Debts as we forgive our Debtors[1],\" we pray, that God for Christ's sake would freely pardon all our Sins[2]; which we are the rather encouraged to ask, because by his Grace we are enabled from the Heart to forgive others[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.12", "osis": ["Matt.6.12"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Ps.51.1-Ps.51.2,Ps.51.7,Ps.51.9", "osis": ["Ps.51.1-Ps.51.2", "Ps.51.7", "Ps.51.9"]}, {"raw": "Dan.9.17-Dan.9.19", "osis": ["Dan.9.17-Dan.9.19"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "Luke.11.4", "osis": ["Luke.11.4"]}, {"raw": "Matt.18.35", "osis": ["Matt.18.35"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "113", "sort_key": 113, "question": "What do we pray for in the sixth Petition?", "answer": "In the sixth Petition, which is, \"And lead us not into Temptation, but deliver us from Evil,\" we pray that God would either keep us from being tempted to Sin, or support and deliver us when we are tempted.", "answer_with_proofs": "In the sixth Petition, which is, \"And lead us not into Temptation, but deliver us from Evil[1],\" we pray that God would either keep us from being tempted to Sin[2], or support and deliver us when we are tempted[3].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.13", "osis": ["Matt.6.13"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.26.41", "osis": ["Matt.26.41"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "2Cor.12.8", "osis": ["2Cor.12.8"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "_source_title": "1695 Baptist Catechism", "_author": "William Collins", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "cc0-1.0", "_source_url": "http://access.bl.uk/item/viewer/ark:/81055/vdc_100026931442.0x000001#?#ark:/81055/vdc_100026931451.0x00000a&c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=8&xywh=-64,0,2839,1783", "document_id": "1695-baptist-catechism", "item_id": "114", "sort_key": 114, "question": "What doth the Conclusion of the Lord's Prayer teach?", "answer": "The Conclusion of the Lord's Prayer, which is, \"For thine is the Kingdom, and the Power, and the Glory, for ever, Amen,\" teacheth us to take our Encouragement in Prayer from God only, and in our Prayers to praise him, ascribing Kingdom, Power and Glory to him: And in testimony of our Desire, and Assurance to be heard, we say, Amen.", "answer_with_proofs": "The Conclusion of the Lord's Prayer, which is, \"For thine is the Kingdom, and the Power, and the Glory, for ever, Amen[1],\" teacheth us to take our Encouragement in Prayer from God only[2], and in our Prayers to praise him, ascribing Kingdom, Power and Glory to him[3]: And in testimony of our Desire, and Assurance to be heard, we say, Amen[4].", "proofs": [{"id": 1, "references": [{"raw": "Matt.6.13", "osis": ["Matt.6.13"]}]}, {"id": 2, "references": [{"raw": "Dan.9.4,Dan.9.7-Dan.9.9,Dan.9.16-Dan.9.19", "osis": ["Dan.9.4", "Dan.9.7-Dan.9.9", "Dan.9.16-Dan.9.19"]}]}, {"id": 3, "references": [{"raw": "1Chr.29.10-1Chr.29.13", "osis": ["1Chr.29.10-1Chr.29.13"]}]}, {"id": 4, "references": [{"raw": "1Cor.14.16", "osis": ["1Cor.14.16"]}, {"raw": "Rev.22.20-Rev.22.21", "osis": ["Rev.22.20-Rev.22.21"]}]}], "group": null, "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "1", "sort_key": 1, "group": "Chapter I", "question": "What is emhraced under Exegetical Theology ?", "answer": "If the facts (1) That there is a God, and (2) that he has spoken, be established, it remains to answer the question, ''What has God said?\" Exegetical Theology is the general title of that department of theological science which aims at the Interpretation of the Scriptures as the word of God, recorded in human language, and transmitted to us through human channels; and in order to this. Interpretation aims to gather and organize all that knowledge which is necessarily intro- ductory thereto. This includes tlie answer to two main ques- tions: (1) What books form the canon, and what were the exact words of which the original autographs of the writers of these several books consisted, and (2) What do those divine words, so ascertained, mean. The answers to all questions preliminary to actual Interpre- tation, come under the head of Introduction, and this is divided (1) into General Introduction, presenting all that information, preliminary to interpretation, which stands related in common to the Bible as a whole, or to each Testament as a whole, and (2) into Sjyecial Introduction, which includes all necessary prepa- ration for the interpretation of each book of the Bible in detail. A. General Introduction includes — 1st. The Higher Criticism or the canvass of the extant evidences of all kinds establishing the authenticity and genuine- ness of each book in the sacred canon. 2d. The Criticism of the Text, which, from a comparison of the best ancient manuscripts and versions, from internal evi- dence, and by means of a critical liistory of the text from its first appearance to the present, seeks to determine the ipsissima verba of the original autographs of the inspired writers. 3d. Biblical \"Fhilology, which answers the questions: Why were different languages used in the record? and why Hebrew and Greek ? What are the special characteristics of the dia- lects of those languages actually used, and their relation to the families of language to which they belong? And what Avere the special characteristics of dialect, style, etc., of the sacred writers individually. EXEGETICAL THEOLOGY. 21 4th. Biblical Arcliceology, including the physical and political geography of Bible lands during the course of Bible history, and determining the physical, ethnological, social, political, and religious conditions of tlie people among whom the Script- ures originated, together with an account of their customs and institutions, and of the relation of these to those of their ances- tors and of their contemporaries. 5th. Hermeneutics, or the scientific determination of the prin- ciples and rules of Biblical Interpretation, including (1) the logical and grammatical and rhetorical principles determining the interpretation of human language in general, (2) the mod- ification of these principles appropriate to the interpretation of the specific forms of human discourse, e. g., history, poetry, prophecy, parable, symbol, etc., and (3) those further modifica- tions of these principles appropriate to the interpretation of writings supernaturally inspired. 6th. Apologetics having established the fact that the Chris- tian Scnptures are the vehicle of a supernatural revelation, we must now discuss and determine the nature and extent of Bib- lical Inspiration as far as this is determined by the claims and the phenomena of the Scriptures tliemselves. 7th. The History of Intevpretation, including the history of ancient and modern versions and schools of interpreta- tion, illustrated by a critical comparison of the most eminent commentaries. B. Special Introduction treats of each book of the Bible by itself, and furnishes all that knowledge concerning its dialect, authorship, occasion, design, and reception that is necessary for its accurate interpretation. • C. Exegesis proper is the actual application of all the knowl- edge gathered, and of all the rules developed, in the preceding departments of Introduction to the Interpretation of the sacred text, as it stands in its original connections of Testaments, books, paragraphs, etc. Following the laws of grammar, the usus loqiiendi of words, the analogy of Scripture, and the guidance of the Holy Ghost, Exegesis seeks to determine the mind of the Spirit as expressed in the inspired sentences as they stand in their order. There are several special departments classed under the general head of Exegetical Theology, which involve in some degree that arrangement and combination of Scripture testi- monies under topics or subjects, which is the distinctive char- acteristic of Systematic Theology. These are — 1st. Tyjiology, which embraces a scientific determination of the laws of Biblical symbols and types, and their interpretation, 22 THEOLOGICAL ENCYCLOPAEDIA. especially those of the ]\\Iosaic ritual as related to the person and work of Christ. 2d. Old Testament Christology, the critical exposition of the Messianic idea as it is developed in the Old Testament. 3d. Biblical Theology, wliich traces the gradual evolution of the several elements of revealed truth from their first sugges- tion through every successive stage, to their fullest manifesta- tion in the sacred text, and which exhibits the peculiar forms and connections in which these several truths are presented by each inspired Avriter. 4th. The Development of the principles of Prophetical In- terpretation and their application to the construction of an outline of the Prophesies of both Testaments. — \" Notes on New Testament Literature,\" by Dr. J. A. Alexander. 10. What is embraced under the head of Systematic Theology. As the name imports, Systematic Theology has for its object the gathering all that the Scriptures teach as to what we are to believe and to do, and the presenting all the elements of this teaching in a symmetrical system. The human mind must seek unity in all its knowledge. God's truth is one, and all the contents of all revelations natural and supernatural must constitute one self-contained system, each part organically re- lated to every other. The method of construction is inductive. It rests upon the results of Exegesis for its foundation. Passages of Scripture ascertained and interpreted are its data. These when rightly interpreted reveal their own relations and place in the system of which the Person and work of Christ is the centre. And as the contents of revelation stand intimately related to all the other departments of hmnan knowledge, the work of Systematic Theology necessarily involves the demonstration and illustra- tion of the harmony of all revealed truth with all valid science, material and ps3'chological, with all true speculative philosophy, and with all true moral philosophy and practical philanthropy. It includes — (1.) The construction of all the contents of revelation into a complete system of faith and duties. (2.) The history of this process as it has prevailed in the Church during the past. (3.) Polemics. I. The construction of all the contents of revelation into a complete system. This includes the scientific treatment (a) of all the matters of faith revealed, and (h) of all the duties enjoined. In the arrangement of topics the great majority of theolo- gians have followed what Dr. Cliahners calls the synthetical method. Starting with the idea and nature of God revealed in SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY. 23 the Scriptures, they trace his eternal purposes and temporal acts in creation, providence, and redemption to the final con- summation. The Doctor himself prefers what he calls the analytic method, and starts with the facts of experience and the lig-ht of nature, and man's present morally diseased con- dition, leads upward to redemption and to the character of God as revealed therein. Following the former of these methods all the elements of the system are usually grouped under the following heads : 1st. Theology proper: including the existence, attributes, triune personality of God, together with his eternal purposes, and temporal acts of creation and providence. 2d. Anthropology : (doctrine of man) including the creation and nature of man, his original state, fall, and consequent moral ruin. This embraces the Biblical Psychology, and the Script- ural doctrine of sin, its nature, origin, and mode of propagation. 3d. Soteriology : (doctrine of salvation) which includes the plan, execution, and application and glorious effects of human salvation. This embraces Christology (the doctrine of Christ), the incarnation, the constitution of Clirist's person, his life, death, and resurrection, together with the oftice-work of the Holy Ghost, and the means of grace, the word and sacraments. 4th. Christian Ethics: embracing the principles, rvdes, mo- tives, and aids of human duty revealed in the Bible as deter- mined (o) by his natural relations as a man with his fellows, and (?)) his supernatural relations as a redeemed man. 5th. Eschatology (science of last things) comprehending death, the intermediate state of the soul, the second advent, the resurrection of the dead, the general judgment, heaven and hell. 6th. Ecclesiology (science of the Church); including the scientific determination of all that the Scriptures teach as to the Church visible and invisible, in its temporal and in its eternal state ; including the Idea of the Church — its true defi- nition— its constitution and organization, its officers and their functions. A comparison and criticism of all the modifications of ecclesiastical organization that have ever existed, together with their genesis, history, and practical effects. II. Doctrine-History, which embraces the history of each of these great doctrines traced in its first appearance and sub- sequent development, through the controversies it excited and the Confessions in which it is defined. III. Polemics, or Controversial Theology, including the de- fence of the true system of doctrine as a whole and of each constituent element of it in detail against the perversions of heretical parties within the pale of the general Church. This embraces — (1.) The general principles and true method of relig- 24 THEOLOGICAL ENCYCLOPEDIA. ions controversies. (2.) The definition of the true Status Quces- tionis in each controversy, and an exposition of the sources of evidence and of the methods, defensive and offensive, by which the truth is to be vindicated. (3.) Tlie history of controversies.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "2", "sort_key": 2, "group": "Chapter I", "question": "What is embraced itnder the head of Practical Theology?", "answer": "Practical Theology is both a science and an art. As an art it has for its purpose the effective publication of the contents of revelation among all men, and the perpetuation, extension, and edification of the earthly kingdom of God. As a science it has for its province the revealed principles and laws of the art above defined. Hence as Systematic Theology roots itself in a thorough Exegesis at once scientific and spiritual, so docs Practical Theology root itself in the great principles develoj)ed by Sj^stematic Theology, the department of Ecclesiology being connnon ground to both departments: the product of the one, and the foundation of the other. It includes the following main divisions — ■1st. The discussion of the Idea and Design of the Church, and of its divinely revealed attributes. 2d. The determination of the divinel}^ appointed constitu- tion of the Church, and methods of administration, with the discussion and refutation of all the rival forms of Churcli organ- ization that have prevailed, their history, and that of the con- troversies which they have occasioned. 3d. The discussion of the nature and extent of the discre- tion Christ has allowed his followers in adjusting the methods of ecclesiastical organization and administration to changing social and historical conditions. 4th. Church membership, its conditions, and the relation to Christ involved, together with the duties and privileges abso- lute and relative of the several classes of members. The rela- tion of baptized children to the Church, and the relative duties of Parents and of the Church in relation to them. 5tli. The Officers of the Church — extraordinary and tempo- rary; ordinar}^ and perpetual. (1.) Their call and ordination; their relations to Christ and to the Church. (2.) Their functions — A. As Teacliers — including — (a.) Catechetics, its necessity, principles, and history. (b.) Sunday-schools. The duties of parents and of the Church in respect to the religious education of children. (c) Sacred Rhetoric. Homiletics and pulpit elocution. {(l.) Christian literature. The newspaper, and periodicals and permanent books. PRACTICAL THEOLOGY. 25 B. As Leaders of Worship, including- — (a.) Liturgies, their uses, abuses, and history. (&. ) Free forms of prayer. (c.) Psahnody, inspired and uninspired, its uses and history. (fZ.) Sacred Music, vocal and instrumental uses and history. C. As Ptulers — (a.) The office, qualification, duties and Scriptural Warrant of Kuling Elders — (i.) The office, qualification, duties, mode of election, and ordination, and Scriptural Warrant of the New -Testament Bishop or Pastor. (c.) The Session, its constitution and functions. The the- ory and practical rules and methods of Church discipline. (d) The Presbytery and its constitution and functions. The theory and practical rules and precedents regulating the action of Church courts, in the exercise of the constitutional right of Review and Control in the issue and conduct of trials, complaints, appeals, etc., etc. (e.) The Synod and General Assembly and their constitu- tion and functions. The Principles a-nd policy of Committees, Commissioners, Boards, etc., etc. This leads to the functions of the Church as a whole, and the warrant for and the uses and abuses of Denominational dis- tinctions, and the relations of the different Denominations to one another. 1st. Church Statistics, including our own Church, other Churches, and the world. 2d. Christian, social, and ecclesiastical economics, including the duties of Christian stewardship, personal consecration, and systematic benevolence. The relation of the Church to the poor and to criminals, the administration of orphan asylums, hospitals, prisons, etc. The relation of the Church to volun- tary societies. Young Men's Christian Associations, etc., etc. 3d. The education of the ministry, the policy, constitution and administration of theological seminaries. 4th. Domestic Missions, including aggressive evangeliza- tion, support of the ministry among the poor, Church exten- sion and Church erection. 5th. The relation of the Church to the state, and the true relation of the state to religion, and the actual condition of the common and statute law with relation to Church property, and the action of Church Courts in the exercise of discipline, etc. The obligations of Christian citizenship. The relation of the Church to civilization, to moral reforms, to the arts, sciences, social refinements, etc., etc. 6th. Foreign Missions in all their departments. 26 THEOLOGICAL ENCYCLOPEDIA. See \" Lectures on Theological Encyclopaedia and Method- ology,\" by Rev. John M'Clintock, D.D., LL.D., edited by J. T. Short, B.b. ; and \" Bibliotheca Sacra,\" Vol. 1, 1844; \"Theolog- ical Encyclopaedia and Methodology,\" from unpublished lecture of Prof. Tholuck, by Prof E. A. Park.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "3", "sort_key": 3, "group": "Chapter I", "question": "W]icd is embraced under the head of Historical Theology?", "answer": "According to the logical evolution of the whole contents of the theological sciences, the Interpretation of the letter of Scripture, and the construction of the entire Sj^stem of related truths and duties revealed therein, must precede the History of the actual development of that revelation in the life and faith of the Church. Just as the fountain must precede the stream which tlows from it. Yet, as a matter of fact, in the actual study of the family of theological sciences. History must precede and lay the foundation for all the rest. History alone gives us the Scriptures in which our revelation is recorded, and the means whereby the several books and their ipsissima verba are critically ascertained. We are indebted to tJie same source for our methods of interpretation, and for their results as illustrated in the body of theological literature accimiulated in the past; also for our creeds and confessions and records of controversies, and hence for the records preserving the gradual evolution of our system of doctrine. In the order of pro- duction and of acquisition History comes first, while in the order of a logical exposition of tlie constituent theological sciences in their relations within the system. History has the honor of crowning the whole series. Historical Theology is divided into Bihlical and Ecclesiastical. The first derived cliiefly from inspired sources, and continuing down to the close of the New Testament canon. The latter beginning where the former ends, and continuing to the pres- ent time. Biblical History is subdivided into — 1st. Old Testament History, including (1) the Patriarchal, (2) Mosaic, and (3) Pro- phetical eras, together with (4) the history of the chosen peo- ple during the interval between the close of the Old and the opening of the New Testament. 2d. New Testament His- tory, including (1) the life of Christ, (2) The founding of the Christian Church by the Apostles down to the end of the first century. With respect to Ecclesiastical History several preliminary departments of study are essential to its prosecution as a science. 1st. Several of the auxiliary sciences already enumerated must be cited as specifically demanded in this connection. HISTORICAL THEOLOGY. 27 These are — (1.) Ancient, Medieeval, and Modern Geography. (2.) Chronology. (3.) The Antiquities of all the peoples embraced in the area through which the Church has at any period ex- tended. (4.) Statistics, exhibiting the actual condition of the world at any particular period. (5. ) The entire course of General History. 2d. The Sources from which Ecclesiastical History is de- rived should be critically investigated. (1.) Monumental sources, such as (a) buildings, (6) inscriptions, (c) coins, etc. (2.) Docu- mental, which are — (a.) Public, such as the Acts of Councils, the briefs, decretals, and bulls of Popes; the archives of govern- ments, and the creeds, confessions, catechisms, and liturgies of the Churches, etc., etc. (&.) Private documents, such as con- temporary literature of all kinds, pamphlets, biographies, annals, and later reports and compilations. 3d. The History of the literature of ecclesiastical history from Eusebius to Neander, Kurtz, and Scliaff. The methods Avhich have been and which should be followed in the arrange- ment of the material of Church History. The actual JMethod always has been and probably always will be a combination of the two natural methods — (o) chrono- logical, and (?>j topical. The fundamental principle upon which, according to Dr. IM'Clintock, the materials of Church History should be ar- ranged, is the distinction between the life and the faith of the Church. The two divisions therefore, are (1) History of the life of the Church, or Church History proper, and (2) History of the thought of the Church, or Doctrine-History. 1st. The History of the Life of the Church deals with per- sons, communities, and events, and shoidd be treated according to the ordinary methods of historical composition. 2d. The History of the Thought of the Church comprises — (1.) Patristics, or the literature of the early Christian Fathers; and Patrology, or a scientific exhibition of their doctrine. These Fathers are grouped under three heads — (a) Apostol- ical, {l)) Ante-Nicene, and (c) Post-Nicene, terminating with Gregory the Great among the Latins, a. d. 604, and with John of Damascus among the Greeks, a. d. 754. This study involves the discussion of (a) the proper use of these Fathers, and their legitimate authority in modern controversies; (6) a full history of their literature, and of the principal editions of their works ; and (c) the meaning, value, and doctrine of each individual Father separately — (2.) Christian Archaeology, which treats of the usage, wor- ship, discipline of the early Church, and the history of Chris- tian worship, art, architecture, poetry, painting, music, etc., etc. 28 THEOLOGICAL ENCYCLOPEDIA. (3.) Doctrine-History, or the critical history of the genesis and development of each element of the doctrinal system of the Church, or of any of its historical branches, with an account of all the heretical forms of doctrine from which the truth has been separated, and the history of all the controversies by means of which the elimination has been effected. This will, of course, be accompanied with a critical history of the entire Literature of D(Jctrine-History, of the principles recognized, the methods pursued, and the works produced. (4) Symbolics, which involves — (rt.) The scientific deter- mination of the necessity for and uses of public Creeds and Confessions. (6.) The history of the occasions, of the actual genesis, and subsequent reception, authority, and influence of each one of the Creeds and Confessions of Christendom, (c.) The study of the doctrinal contents of each Creed, and of each group of Creeds separately, and (r/.) Comparative Sym- bolics, or the comparative study of all the Confessions of the Church, and thence a systematic exliibition of all their respect- ive points of agreement and of contrast. M'Clintock's \"Theological Encyclopaedia\"; \"Notes on Ec- clesiastical History,\" by Dr. J. A. Alexander, edited by Dr. S. D. Alexander.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "4", "sort_key": 4, "group": "Chapter II", "question": "Hoio can a \"real\" definition of God he constructed?", "answer": "Evidently God can be defined only in so far as he is known to us, and the condition of the possibility of our knowing him 30 THE BEING OF GOD. is the fact that we were created in liis image. Every definition of\" God must assume this fact, that in an essential sense he and his intelligent creatures are beings of the same genus. He is therefore defined by giving his genus and specific difference. Thus he is as to genus, an intelligent personal Spirit. He is, as to his specific difference, as to that which constitutes him God, infinite, eternal, unchangeable in his being, in his wisdom, in his power, in his holiness, and in all perfections consistent with his being.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "5", "sort_key": 5, "group": "Chapter II", "question": "To lohat extent is the idea of God dite to Tixidition ?", "answer": "It is evident that the complete idea of God presented in the foregoing definition has been attained only by means of the supernatural revelation recorded in the Christian Scriptures. It is a fact also that the only three Theistic religions which have ever prevailed among men (the Jewish, Mohammedan and Christian) are historically connected with the same revela- tion. It is also, of course, in vain to speculate as to Avhat would be the action of the human mind independent of all inherited habits, and of all traditional opinions. We are en- tirely without experience or testimony as to any kind of knowl- edge attained or judgments formed under such conditions. It is moreover certain that the form in which the theistic concep- tion is realized, and the associations with which it is accom- panied, are determined in the case of each community by the theological traditions they have inherited from their fathers. It IS, on the other hand, indubitably certain that all men under all known, and tlierefore under all truly natural con- ditions, do spontaneously recognize the divine existence as more or less clearly revealed to them in the constitution and conscious experience of their own souls, and in external nature. The theistic conception hence is no more due to authority, as often absurdly charged, than the belief in the subjective reality of spirit or in the objective reality of matter formed under the same educational conditions. The recognition of the self-man- ifest God is spontaneous, and universal, which proves the evi- dence to be clear and everywhere present, and convincing to all normally developed men.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} -{"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "6", "sort_key": 6, "group": "Chapter II", "question": "Is the idea of God innate? And is it an intuitive truth?", "answer": "That depends upon the sense in which the respective terms are taken. It is evident that there are no \"innate\" ideas in the sense that any child was ever born with a conception of the divine being, or any other conception already formed in his mind. It is also certain that the human mind when developed under purely natural conditions, in the absence of all super- IN WHAT SENSE INNATE? 31 natural revelation, can never attain to an adequate conception of the divine nature. On the other hand, however, all' history- proves that the idea of God is innate in the sense that the constitutional faculties of the human soul do, under all natural conditions, secure the spontaneous recognition, more or less clear, of God as tJie ultimate ground of all being, and as the Lord of conscience, self-manifested in the soul and in the world. It is innate in so much as the evidence is as universally present as the light of day, and the process by which it is apprehended is constitutional. If the term \"intuition\" is taken in its strict sense of a direct vision of a truth, seen in its own light to be necessary, by an intellectual act incapable of being resolved into more elementary processes of thought, then the existence of God is not a truth apprehended intuitively by men. The process whereby it is reached, whether spontaneously or by elaborate reasoning, em- braces many indubitable intuitions as elements, but no man apprehends God himself by a direct intuition. Because — (1.) Although the recognition of the divine exist- ence is necessary in the sense that the great majority of men recognize the truth, and are unable to disbelieve it even when they wish, and no one can do so without doing violence to his nature, yet it is not necessar}^ to thought in the sense that the non-existence of God is unthinkable. (2.) Because God mani- fests himself to us not immediately but mediately through his works, and there is always present, at least implicitly, an infer- ence in the act whereby the soul recognizes his presence and action. (3.) The true idea of God is exceedingly complex, and is reached by a complex process, whether spontaneous or not, involving various elements capable of analysis and description. On the other hand it is true that God manifests himself in his working in our souls and in external nature just as the invisible souls of our fellow-men manifest themselves, and we spontaneously recognize him just as we do them. We recog- nize them because (a) we are generically like them, and (5) their attributes are significally expressed in their words and actions. And we recognize God because (a) we have been made in his image, Avliich fact we spontaneously recognize (6) from his self- revelations in consciousness, especially in conscience, and from the characteristics of the external world. \"While the mental process which has been described — the theistic inference — is capable of analysis, it is itself synthetic. The principles on which it depends are so connected that the mind can embrace them all in a single act, and must include and apply them all in the apprehension of God. Will, intel- ligence, conscience, reason, and the ideas which they supply; 32 THE BEING OF GOD. cause, design, goudness, infinity, and the arguments which rest on these ideas — all coalesce into this one grand issue.\" — \"Theism\" by Prof. Flint, pp. 71, 72. 5. If the existence of God is spontaneously recognized hy all men under normcd conditions of consciousness, ivhat is the value of formal arguments to prove that existence ? And lohat are the arguments generally used? 1st. These arguments are of value as analyses and scientific verifications of the mental processes implicitly involved in the spontaneous re cognition of the self-manifestations of God. 2d. They are of i. ^e also for the purpose of vindicating the legitimacy of the :)rocess against the criticisms of skeptics. 3d. Also for the purpose of quickening and confirming the spon- taneous recognition by draAving attention to the extent and variety of the evidence to which it responds. 4th. The vari- ous arguments are convergent rather than consecutive. They do not all establish the same elements of the theistic concep- tion, but each establishes independently its separate element, and thus is of use («) in contributing confirmatory evidence that God is, and (Ij) complementary evidence as to ivhcd God is. They constitute an organic whole, and are the analysis and illustration of the spontaneous act whereby the mass of men have always recognized God. \"Although causality does not involve design, nor design goodness, design involves causality, and goodness both causality and design. The proofs of intelli- gence are also proofs of power; and the proofs of goodness are proofs of both intelligence and power. The principles of reason which compel us to think of the Supreme Moral Intelligence as self-existent, eternal, infinite, and unchangeable Being, supple- ment the proofs from other sources, and give self-consistency and completeness to the doctrine of theism.\" — \"Theism,\" Prof. Flint, pp. 73, 74. The usual arguments will be examined under the following heads : 1st. The Cosmological Argument, or the evidence for God's existence as First Cause. 2d. The Teleological Argument, or the evidence of God's existence aftbrded by the presence of order and adaptation in the universe. 3d. The Moral Argument, or the evidence afforded by the moral consciousness and history of mankind. 4th. The evidence afforded by the phenomena of Scripture and the supernatural history they record. 5th. The A priori Argument, and the testimony afforded by reason to God as the Infinite and Absolute. THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUM VT. 33 6. State the Cosmological Argument. It may be stated in tlie form of a syllogism, thus — Major Premise. — Every new existence or change in any thing previously existing must have had a cause pre-existing and adequate. 3Iinor Premise. — The universe as a whole and in all its parts is a system of changes. Conclusion. — Hence the universe must have a cause exterior to itself, and the ultimate or absolute caus'^^ must be eternal, uncaused, and unchangeable. 1st. As to the major premise; the caus/l judgment is in- tuitive and absolutel}^ universal and necesl -iry. It has been denied theoretically by some speculators, as Hume and Mill, but it is always used by them and all others in all their rea- soning as to the origin of the world, as well as of all things it contains. The judgment is unavoidable; the opposite is un- thinkable. Something exists now, therefore something must have existed from eternity, and that which has existed from eternity is the cause of that w^iicli exists now. It has been claimed that the causal judgment leads to an infinite regressive series of causes and effects. But this is absurd. (1.) The judgment is not that every thing must have a. cause, but that every new thing or change must have been caused. But that which is eternal and immutable needs no cause. (2.) An infinite series of causes and effects is absurd, for that is only a series of changes, wdiich is precisely that which demands a cause, and all the more imperatively in pro- portion to its length. A real cause, on the other hand, — that in which the causal judgment can alone absolutely rest, — must be neither a change nor a series of changes, but something uncaused, eternal and immutable. As a matter of fact all philosophers and men of science without exception assume the principles asserted. They all postulate an eternal, self-existent, imchangeable cause of the universe, whether a personal spirit, or material atoms, or a substance of wdiich both matter and spirit are modes, or an unconscious intelligent world-soul in union with matter. 2d. As to the minor premise. The fact that the universe as a whole and in all its parts is a system of changes is empha- sized by every principle and lesson of modern science. Every discovery in the fields of geology and astronomy, and all spec- ulation— as the nebular hypothesis and the hypothesis of evolu- tion— embody this principle as their very essence. But John Stuart Mill in his \"Essay on Theism,\" pp. 142, 143, says: \"There is in nature a permanent element, and also a 3J: THE BEING OF GOD. changeable: the changes are always the effects of previous changes; the permanent existences, so far as we know, are not effects at all. . . . There is in every object another and permanent element, viz., the specific elementary substance or substances of which it consists, and their inherent properties. These are not known as beginning to exist; within the range of human knowledge they had no beginning, consequently no cause; though they themselves are causes or concauses of every thing that takes place.\" \" Whenever a physical phenomenon is traced to its cause, that cause when analyzed is found to be a certain quantum of force, combined with certain collocations. The force itself is essentially one and the same, and there exists of it in nature a fixed quantity, which (if the the- ory of the conservation of forces be true) is never increased or diminished. Here then we find in the changes of material nature a permanent element, to all appearance the very one of which we are in quest. This it is apparently to which, if to any thing, we must assign the character of First Cause.\" — \"Essay on Theism,\" pp. 144, 145. We answer — (1.) The existence of \"Energy\" in any of its convertable forms dissociated from matter is absolutely un- thinkable. This is recognized as an unquestionable scientific truth by Stewart and Tait (\" Unseen Universe,\" p. 79). (2.) It is an obvious fact \"that all but an exceedingly small trac- tion of the light and heat of the sun and stars goes out into space, and does not return to them. In the next place the vis- ible motion of the large bodies of the universe is gradually being stopped by something which may be denominated ethe- rial friction,\" and at last they must fall together, and constitute by successive aggregations one mass. \"In fine the degradation of Energy of the visible universe proceeds, 'pari jpassii^ with the aggregation of mass. The very fact, therefore, that the large masses of the visible universe are of finite size, is suffi- cient to assure us that the process can not have been going on forever, or in other words that the visible universe must have had an origin in time\" — since (a) Energy remains aggregated iit finite quantities yet undiftused, and {h) since the matter of the universe still remains in separate masses. Thus the very law o,f the correlation of Energy to which Mill appeals proves, when really tested, that the visible imiverse had a beginning and will have an end. Stewart and Tait (\" Unseen Universe,\" p. 166). (3.) His assumption, also, that the matter of the uni- verse is in its ultimate atoms eternal and unchangeable, is un- proved and contrary to scientific analogy. Clark ]\\Iaxwell (in his address as President of the British Association for Advance- ment of Science, 1870) says: \"The exact equality of each mole- THE TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. 35 cule to all others of the same kind gives it, as Sir John Her- schell has well said, the essential character of a manufactured article, and precludes the idea of its being eternal and self-ex- istent.\" (4.) As a matter of fact all evolution theories as to the genesis of the universe necessarily postulate a commence- ment in time, and a primordial fire-mist. But this fire-mist can not be the First Cause the causal judgment demands, be- cause it is not eternal and immutable. If eternal it would be fully developed. If fully developed it could not develop into the universe. If immutable it could not pass into change. If not immutable it is itself, like the universe which issues from it, a transient condition of matter, like aJl other change de- manding for itself a cause. 7. State the Teleological Argument. Teleology from reAo?, end, and Xoyo'i, discourse, is the sci- ence of final causes, or of purposes or design as exhibited in the adjustments of parts to wholes, of means to ends, of organs to uses in nature. It is also familiarly called the Argument from Design ; and is ultimately based upon the recognition of the operations of an intelligent cause in nature. It may be profit- ably stated in two forms based respectively on the more general and the more special manifestations of that intelligence. First Form. Major Premise. — Universal order and harmony in the conspiring operation of a vast multitude of separate ele- ments can be explained only by the postulate of an intelligent cause. Minor Premise. — The universe as a whole and in all its parts is a fabric of the most complex and symmetrical order. Conclusion. — Therefore the eternal and absolute cause of the universe is an intelligent mind. Second Form. Major Premise. — The adjustment of parts and the adaptation of means to effect an end or purpose can be ex- plained only by reference to a designing intelligence and will. Minor Premise. — The universe is full of such adjustments of parts, and of organisms composed of parts conspiring to efi\"ect an end. Conclusion. — Therefore the First Cause of the universe must be an intelligent mind and wall. These arguments if valid amount to proving that God is an eternal self-existing Person. For the assumption of an un- conscious intelligence, or of an intelligence producing effects without the exercise of will is absurd. These phrases repre- sent no possible ideas. And intelligence and will together constitute personality. As to the first form of the argument it is evident that the 36 THE BEING OF GOD. very fact that science is possible is an indubitable proof that the order of nature is intellectual. Science is a product of the human mind, which is absolutely incapable of passing beyond the laws of its own constitution. Intuitions of reason, logical processes of analysis, inductive or deductive inference, imagi- nation, invention, and all the activities of the soul organize the scientific process. To all this external nature is found perfectly to correspond. Even the most subtle solutions of abstract mathematical and mechanical problems have been subsequently found by experiment to have been anticipated in nature. The laws of nature are expressions of numerical and geometrical harmonies, and are instinct with reason and beauty. Yet these laws although invariable under invariable conditions, are nei- ther eternal nor inherent in the elementary constitution of the universe. The properties of elemental matter are constant, but the laws which organize them are themselves complicated effects resulting from antecedent adjustments of these elements themselves under the categoi'ies of time, place, quantity, and quality. As these adjustments change the laws change. These adjustments, therefore, are the cause of these laws, and the ad- justments themselves must be the product either of chance, which is absurd, or of intelligence, which is certain. This intellectual order of nature is the first necessary postu- late of all science, and it is the essence of all the processes of the universe from the grouping of atoms to the revolution of worlds, from the digestion of a polyp to the functional action of the human brain. As to the second form of this Argument. — The principle of design presupposes the general intellectual order of the uni- verse and her laws, and presents in advance the affirmation that the character of the First Cause is further ma^iifested by the everywhere present evidence that these general laws are made to conspire by special adjustments to the accomplishment of ends evidently intended. This principle is illustrated by the mutual adjustments of the various provinces of nature, and especially by the vegetable and animal organisms, and the re- lations they involve, of organ to organism, of organism to in- stinct, and of single organisms and classes of organisms to each other and to their physical surroundings. In many cases the intention of these special adjustments is self-evident and undeniable, as in the case of the parts of the eye to the pur- pose of vision. In other cases it is more obscure and conject- in-al. In the present condition of science we can understand oidy in part, but froni the beginning the evidence of intel- ligent purpose has been transparent and overwhelming. A single sentence proves intelligence, although the context is OBJECTIONS TO THE TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. 37 undecipherable. But every advance of science discloses the same evidence over wider areas and in clearer light. 8. State and answer the objections to the theistic inference from the evidences of special design. 1st. Hume (\"Dialogues on Natural Religion,\" Pt. VII., etc.,) argues that our conviction that adaptation implies design is due to experience and cannot go beyond it. That our judg- ment that natural organisms imply design in their cause is an inference from the analogy of human contrivance, and its effects. He argues further that this analogy is false because — (1.) The human worker is antecedently known to us as an intelligent contriver, while the author of nature is antecedently unknown, and the very object sought to be verified by the theistic infer- ence. (2.) The processes of nature are all unlike the processes by which man executes his contrivances, and the formation of the world, and the institution of the processes of nature are peculiar effects of the like of which we have no experience. We answer — (1.) The argument rests upon a false assump- tion of fact. The human contriver, the soul of our fellow-man, is not antecedently known to us, nor is ever in any way known except by the character of the works by which he manifests himself And precisely in the same way and to the same ex- tent is the Author of natiue known. (2.) It rests on a false assumption of principle. The analogy of human contrivances is not the ground of our conviction that order and adaptation imply intelligence. It is a universal and necessary judgment of reason that order and adaptation can only spring from an intelhgent cause, or from accident, and that the latter supposi- tion is absurd. 2d. Some men of science, who have become habituated to the consideration of the universe as an absolute unit, all the pro- cesses of w^iich are executed by invariable general laws (a mode of thought in which for centuries science was anticipated by Augustinian Theology), object that in inferring intention from the adjustment of parts in special groups or systems, the natural theologian had mistaken a part for a whole, and an incidental effect of a general law, resulting from special and temporary conditions, for the real end of the law itself They hold that if even the First Cause of the universe were intelli- gent, it were infinitely absurd for men to presume to interpret his purpose from what we see of the special results of the working of laws working from infinite past time, through infi- nite space, and over an infinite system of conspiring parts. We ansiver — (1.) It is self-evident that the relations of the parts of a special whole conspiring to a special end may be 38 THE BEING OF GOD. fully understood, while the relations of that special whole to the general whole may be entirel}' unknown, although strong light is thrown even on this side by reason and revelation. A single bone of an unknown species of animal gives undeniable evidence of special adaptation, and may even, as scientists justly claim, throAv light beyond itself upon the constitution of that otherwise unknown whole to which it belonged. (2.) We con- fess that this criticism, although failing as to the argument from design, has force relatively to the mode iu which that argument has often been conceived. The older natural theolo- gians did often to too great a degree abstra(;t individual or- ganisms from the great dynamic whole of which they are products as well as parts. Dr. Flint (\"Theism,\" p. 159) well distinguishes between the intrioisic, the extrinsic^ and the ulti- mate ends of any special adjustment. Thus the intrinsic end of that special adjustment of parts called the eye is vision. Its extrinsic ends are the uses it serves to the animal it belongs to, and all the uses he serves to all he stands immediately or remotely related to. Its ultimate ei«;l is the end of the uni- verse itself \"Theism,\" p. 163 — \"When we affirm, then, that final causes in the sense of intrinsic ends are in things, we affirm merely that things are systematic unities, the parts of which are definitely related to one another, and co-ordinated to a common issue; and when we affirm that final causes in the sense of extrinsic ends are in things, we affirm merely that things are not isolated and independent systems, but systems definitely related to other systems, and so adjusted as to be parts or components of higher systems, and means to issues more comprehensive than their own.\" It is true indeed that a man can not discern the ultimate end of a part until he discerns the ultimate end of the whole, and that he can not discern all the extrinsic ends of any spe- cial system until he knows all its relations to all other special systems. Nevertheless, as a man who knows nothing of the relation of a given plant or animal to the flora or fauna of a continent, may be absolutely certain of the functions of the root or the claw in the economy of the plant or beast, so the manner in which all the parts which conspire to make a spe- cial whole are adapted to effect that end may be perfectl}' un- derstood, while we know nothing as yet of the extrinsic relation of that special whole to that which is exterior to itself 3d. It has been claimed in recent times by a certain class of scientists that evidence for the existence of God afibrded by the order and adaptation exhibited in the processes of nature has been very much weakened, if not absolutely invalidated, by the assumed probability of the alternative hypothesis of OBJECTIONS TO THE TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. 39 Evolution. There are many theories of Evolution, but the term in the general sense denotes the judgment that the state of the universe as a whole and in all its parts any one moment of time, has its cause in its state the immediately preceding moment, and that these changes have been brought about through the agency of powers inherent in nature, and that they may be traced back from moment to moment without any break of causal continuity through all past time. All possible theories of Evolution, considered in their rela- tion to theology, may be classified thus: (1.) Those which neither deny no^* obscure the evidence which the order and adaptation observed in nature afford to the existence of God, and his immanence in and providential control of his works. (2) Those which, while recognizing God as the original source in the remote past, to which the origination and the primary adjustments of the universe are to be referred, yet deny his immanence and constant providential activity in his works. (3.) Those which professedly or virtually obscure or deny the evidence afforded by the (jwder and adaptation of the universe for the existence and activity of God alike as Creator and as Providential Ruler. With the first class of Evolution theories the Natural Theo- logian has, of course, only the most friendly interest. As to the second class, which admits that a divine intelli- gence contrived and inaugurated the universe at the absolute beginning, yet deny that any such agent is immanent in the universe controlling its processes, we remark — (1.) That the point we have at present to establish is the eternal self-exist- ence of an intelligent First Cause, and not the mode of his relation to the universe. The latter question will be treated in subsequent chapters. (2.) It is far more philosophical, and more in accordance with a true interpretation of the scientifio principle of continuity, to conceive of the First Cause as imma- nent in the universe, and as organically concurring with all unintelligent second causes in all processes exhibiting power or intelligence. This is recognized by that large majority of scientific men who are either orthodox Theists, or who refer all the phenomena of the physical universe to the dynamic ac- tion of the divine will. (3.) The evidence afforded by man's moral consciousness and history and by revelation, to the im- manence and effective agency of God in all his works, is un- answerable. As to the third class of Evolution theories, which do either professedly or virtually obscure or deny the evidence afforded by order or contrivance to an intelligent First Cause of the Universe, as for example the theory of Darwin as to the differ- 40 THE BEING OF GOD. entiation of all organisms through accidental variations occumng through nnlimited time, ave remark — 1st. Every such scheme, when it is proposed as an account of the existing universe, must furnish a probable explanation of all classes of facts. It is notorious that every theory of purely natural Evolution fails utterly to explain the following facts: (1.) The origination of life. It could not have existed in the lire-mist. It could not have been generated by that whicli has no life. The mature decision of science to-day (1878) is expressed in the old axiom onme vivum ex vivo. (2.) The origin of sensation. (3.) Also of intelligence and will. (4). Also of conscience. (5.) The establishment of distinct log- ically corrolated and persistent types of genera and species, maintained by the law of hybridity. (6.) The origin of man. Prof A^irchow of Berlin, in his recent address at the German Association of Naturalists and Physicians at ]\\Iunich, says, \"You are aware that I am now specially engaged in the study of anthropology ; but I am bound to declare that every positive advance which we have made in the province of prehistoric anthropology has actually removed us further from the proof of such connection (i. e., the descent of man from any lower type).\" 2d. But even if continuous evolution could be pi-oved as a fact, the significance of the evidence of intelligent order and contrivance would not be in the least affected. It would only establish a method or system of means, but could in no degree alter the nature of the effect, nor the attributes of tlie real cause disclosed by them. (1.) The laws of abiogenesis, of reproduc- tion, of sexual differentiation and reproduction, of heredity, of variation, such as can evolve sensation, reason, conscience, and will out of atoms and mechanical energy, would all still remain to be accounted for. (2.) Laws are never causes, but always complicated modes of action resulting from the co-action _ of innumerable unconscious agents. Instead, therefore, of being explanations they are the very complex effects for which reason demands an intellectual cause. (3.) All physical laws result from the original properties of matter acting under the mutual condition of certain complicated adjustments. Change the ad- justments and the laws change. The laws which execute evo- lution, or rather into which the process of evolution is analyzed, must be referred back to the original adjustments of the ina- terial elements of the fire-mist. These adjustments, in whicli all future order and life is by hypothesis latent, must have been caused by chance or intelligence. Huxley in his \"Criti- cisms on Origin of Species,\" p. 330, founds the whole logic of Evolution on chance thus: It has been \"demonstrated that an THE MORAL ARGUMENT. 41 apparatus tliorouglily well-adapted to a particular purpose, may- be the result of a method of trial and error worked out by un- intelligent agents, as well as of the direct application of the means appropriate to that end by an intelligent agent.\" \"Ac- cording to Teleology, each organism is like a rifle bullet fired straight at a mark; according to Darwin organisms are like grape-shot, of which one hits something and the rest fall wide.\" The modern scientific explanation of the processes of the uni- verse by physical causes alone, to the exclusion of mind, differs from the old long-exploded chance theory, only by the acci- dents (a) of the juggling use of the words \"laws of nature,\" (/;) and the assumption that chance operating through indefi- nate duration can accomplish the work of intelligence. But as no man can believe that any amount of time will explain the form of flint knives and arrow heads, in the absence of human agents, or that any number of throws could cast a font of type into the order of letters in the plays of Shakespeare, so no man can rationally believe that the complicated and significantly intellectual order of the universe sprang from chance. (4.) In artificial breeding man selects. In \"natural selection\" nature selects. Hence, if the results are the most careful adjustments to effect purpose, it follows that that characteristic must be stamped upon the organisms by nature, and hence nature itself must therefore be intelligently directed, either (a) by an intel- ligence immanent in her elements, or in her whole as organized, or (6) by the original adjustment of her machinery by an intel- ligent Creator. 9. State the 3Ioral Argument, or the Evidence afforded by the 3Ioral Consciousness ayid History of mankind. The Cosmological argument led us to an eternal self-existent First Cause. The argument from the order and adaptation dis- covered in the processes of the universe revealed this great First Cause as possessing intelligence and will; that is, as a personal spirit. The moral or anthropological argument fur- nishes new data for inference, at once confirming the former conclusions as to the fact of the existence of a personal intelli- gent First Cause, and at the same time adding to the concep- tion the attributes of holiness, justice, goodness, and truth. The argument from design includes the argument from cause, and the argument from righteousness and benevolence includes both the arguments from cause and from design, and adds to them a new element of its own. This group of arguments may be stated thus: 1st. Consciousness is the fundamental ground of all knowl- edge. It gives us immediately the knowledge of self as exist- 42 THE BEING OF GOD. ing and as the subject of certain attributes, and the agent in certain forms of activity. Tliese souls and all their attributes must be accounted for. They have not existed from eternity. They could not have been evolved out of material elements, because — (1.) Consciousness testilies to their unity, simplicity, and spirituality. (2.) The laws of reason and the moral sense can not be explained as the result of transformed sense impres- sions modified by association derived by heredity (Mill and Spencer) ; for, (a) they are universally the same, ili) incapable of analysis, (c) necessary, and (c/) sovereign over all impulses. Therefore the human soul must have been created, and its Cre- ator must have attributes superior to his work. 2d. Man is essentially and universally a religious being. The sense of absolute dependence and moral accountability is inherent in his nature, universal and necessary. Conscience- always implies responsibility to a sujDerior, in moral authority, and therefore in moral character. It is especially implied in the sense of guilt which accompanies every violation of con- science. God is manifested and recognized in conscience as a holy, righteous, just, and intelligent will; i. e., a holy personal spirit. 3d. The adaptations of nature, as far as we can trace their relations to sentient beings, are characteristically beneficent, and evidence a general purpose to promote happiness, and to gratify a sense of beauty. This implies design, and design of a special esthetic and moral character, and proves that the First Cause is benevolent and a lover of beauty. 4th. The entire history of the human race, as far as known, discloses a moral order and purpose, which cannot be explained by the intelligence or moral purpose of the human agents con- cerned, which discovers an all-embracing unity of plan, com- prehending all peoples and all centuries. The phenomena of social and national life, of ethnological distribution, of the de- velopment and diffusion of civilizations and religions can be explained only by the existence of a wise, righteous, and be- nevolent ruler and educator of mankind. 10. State and answer the objections to the 3Ioral Argument. These objections are founded — 1st. On the mechanical in- variability of natural laws, and their inexorable disregard of the welfare of sentient creatures. 2d. The sufterings of irrational animals. 3d. The prevalence of moral and ph^^'sical evils among men. 4th. The unequal apportionment of providential favors, and the absence of all proportion between the measure of happiness allotted, and the respective moral characters of the recipients. OBJECTIONS TO MORAL ARGUMENT. 43 These difficulties, more or less trying to the faith of all, are the real occasion in the great majority of instances, of skep- tical atheism. John Stewart Mill in his \" Essay on Nature \" (\"Three Essays on Religion \") describes it as the characteristic of \"Nature\" ruthlessly to inflict suffering and death, and affirms that the cause of nature, if a personal will, must be a monster of cruelty and injustice. In his \" Essay on Theism,\" Pt. ii., he argues that the attempt to maintain that the author of nature, such as we know it, is at once omniscient and omnipotent and absolutely just and benevolent is abominably immoral. That he can be excused of cruelty and injustice only on the plea of limited knowledge or power, or both. He sums up his con- clusion from the evidence thus: \"A Being of great but limited power, how or by what limited we cannot even conjecture; of great and perhaps unlimited intelligence, but perhaps also more narrowly limited than his power : who desires and pays some regard to the happiness of his creatures, but who seems to have other motives of action which he cares more for, and who can hardly be supposed to have created the universe for that pur- pose only.\" In his \"Autobiography,\" cli. ii., he says of his fa- ther, James j\\Iill, \"I have heard him say, that the turning point of his mind on the subject was reading Butler's Analogy. That work, of which he always continued to speak with respect, kept him, as he said, for some considerable time, a believer in the divine authority of Christianity ; by proving to him, that what- ever are the difficulties of believing that the Old and New Tes- taments proceed from, or record the acts of, a perfectly wise and good being, the same and still greater difficulties stand in the way of the belief, that a being of such a character can have been the Maker of the universe. He considered Butler's argu- ment as conclusive against the only opponents for whom it was intended. Those who admit an omnipotent as well as perfectly just and benevolent j\\Iaker and Ruler of such a world as this, can say little against Christianity but what can with at least equal force be retorted against themselves. Finding, therefore, no halting place in Deism, he remained in a state of perplexity, until, doubtless after many struggles, he yielded to the conviction, that concerning the origin of things nothing whatever can be known.\" We answer — 1st. It is unquestionably true that God has not created the universe for the single purpose, or even for the chief purpose, of promoting the happiness of his creatures. Our reason and observation, and the Christian Scriptures, unite in revealing as far higher and more worthy ends of divine action the manifestation of his own glory, and the promotion by edu- cation and discipline of the highest excellence of his intelligent 44 THE BEING OF GOD. moral creatures. It is evident that the operation of inexorable general laws, and the mystery and sufferings incident to this life, may be the most effective means to promote those ends. 2d. The direct intention of all the organs with which sensi- tive creatures are endowed is evidently to promote their well- being; pain and misery are incidental. Even the sudden vio- lent deaths of irrational animals probably promote the largest possible amount of sentient happiness. 3d. Conscience has taught men in all ages that the sufferings incident to human life are the direct and deserved consequences of human sin, either penalties, or chastisements benevolently designed for our moral improvement. 4th. The origin of sin is a confessed mystery, relieved however by the consideration, that it results from the abuse of man's highest and most valuable endowment, responsible free agency, and by the tact revealed in the Chris- tian Scriptures that even sin will be divinely overruled to the fuller manifestation of the perfectioiis of God, and to the higher excellence and the more perfect happiness of the intelligent creation. 5th. The inequalities of the allotments of providence, and the disproportion between the well-being and the moral characters of men in this life, results from the fact that it is not the scene of rewards and punishments, and that different characters and different destinies require a different educational discipline, and it points to future readjustments revealed in the Bible (Ps. Ixxiii.). 6th. Neither the teleological nor the moral argument involves the assertion that \"vvith our present knowl- edge we are able to discern in the universe the evidences of either infinite or perfect wisdom or goodness. These are both indicated as matters of fact, and general characteristics of na- ture. But our discernment of both is necessarily limited by the imperfections of our knowledge. Even in the judgment of rea- son alone the infinite probability is that what appears to us anomalous, inconsistent either with perfect wisdom or perfect goodness, will be found, uj^on the attainment of more adequate information on our part, to illustrate those very perfections which we have been tempted to think they obscure. 11. State the Scriptural Evidence. Since man is a finite and guilty and morally corrupt creature it is unavoidable that the self-manifestations of God in nature should be imperfectly apprehended by him. That supernatural revelation which God has disclosed through an historical process of special interventions in chronological suc- cessions, interpreted by a supernaturally endoAved order of prophets, and recorded in the Christian Scriptures, supple- ments the light of nature, explains the mysteries of provi- THE A PRIORI ARGUMENT. 45 dence, and furnishes ns witli the principles of a true theodice. Tlie God whom nature veils while it reveals him, stands before lis unveiled in all the perfection of wisdom, holiness, and love in the person of Christ. He who hath seen Christ hath seen the Father. The truth of Theism is demonstrated in his per- son, and henceforth Avill never be held except by those who loyally acknowledge his Lordship over intellect and conscience and life. 12. State the principle upon luliicli the A priori arguments for the existence of God rest, the value of the prindjjle, and the p)rin- cipal forms in ivhich they have been presented. An a posteriori argument is one which logically ascends from facts of experience to causes, or principles. Thus by means of the preceding arguments we have been led from the facts of consciousness and of external nature to the knowl- edge of God as an intelligent and righteous personal spirit, the powerful, wise, and benevolent First Cause and jNloral Governor. An a pjnori argument is one which proceeds from the necessar}'- ideas of reason to the consequences necessarily deduced from them, or the truths necessarily involved in them. It is certain that the intuitions of necessary truth are the same in all men. 'Hiey are not generalizations from experience, but are presupposed in all experience. They bear the stamp of universality and necessity. They have objective validity, not depending upon the subjective state of personal conscious- ness, nor depending upon the nature of things, but anterior and superior to all things. What then can be the ground of eternal, necessary, universal, unchangeable truth, unless it be an infinite, eternal, self-existent, unchangeable nature, of whose essence they are. We have seen that our reasons can rest only in a cause itself uncaused. An uncaused cause must be eternal, self-ex- istent, and unchangeable. We have in our minds ideas and intuitions of infinity and perfection, as well as of eternity, self- existence, and immutability. \"These, unless they are wholly delusive — which is what we are unable to conceive — must be predicable of some being. The sole question is. Of what being? It must be of him who has been proved to be the First Cause of all things, the source of all the power, wisdom, and good- ness displayed in the universe. It can not be the universe itself, for that has been shown to be but an effect, to have before and behind it a Mind, a Person. It can not be our- selves, or any thing to which our senses can reach, seeing that we and they are finite, contingent, and imperfect. The author of the universe alone — the Father of our spirits, and the Giver 46 THE BEING OF GOD. of every good and perfect gift — can be uncreated, and uncon- ditioned, infinite, and perfect. This completes the idea of God so far as it can be reached or formed by natural reason. And it gives consistency to the idea. The conclusions of the a \"pos- ieriori arguments fail to satisfy either the mind or the heart until they are connected with and supplemented by, the intui- tion of the reason — infinity. The conception of any other than an infinite God — a God unlimited in all his perfections — is a self-contradictory conception which the intelligence refuses to entertain.\"— Dr. Flint, \"Theism,\" p. 291. 1. Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury (1093-1109), in his '\"'■ Monologium and ProsJogimn\" states the argument thus: We have the idea of an infinitely perfect being. But real exist- ence is a necessary element of infinite perfection. Therefore an infinitely perfect being exists, otherwise the infinitely per- fect as we conceive it would lack an essential element of perfection. 2. Des Cartes (1596-1650) in his ^^ IlecUiationcs de prima pMIosophia\" prop. 2, p. 89, states it thus: The idea of an infinitely perfect being which we possess could not have orig- inated in a finite source, and therefore must have been commu- nicated to us by an infinitely perfect being. He also in other connections claims that this idea represents an objective reality, because (1) it is pre-eminently clear, and ideas carry convic- tion of correspondence to truth in proportion to their clearness, and (2) it is necessary. 3. Dr. Samuel Clarke, in 1705, published his \"Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God.\" He argues that time and space are infinite and necessarily existent. But they are not substances. Therefore there must exist an eternal infinite substance of which they are properties. The Principal Anti-Theistic Theories.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "6", "sort_key": 6, "group": "Chapter II", "question": "Is the idea of God innate? And is it an intuitive truth?", "answer": "That depends upon the sense in which the respective terms are taken. It is evident that there are no \"innate\" ideas in the sense that any child was ever born with a conception of the divine being, or any other conception already formed in his mind. It is also certain that the human mind when developed under purely natural conditions, in the absence of all super- IN WHAT SENSE INNATE? 31 natural revelation, can never attain to an adequate conception of the divine nature. On the other hand, however, all' history- proves that the idea of God is innate in the sense that the constitutional faculties of the human soul do, under all natural conditions, secure the spontaneous recognition, more or less clear, of God as tJie ultimate ground of all being, and as the Lord of conscience, self-manifested in the soul and in the world. It is innate in so much as the evidence is as universally present as the light of day, and the process by which it is apprehended is constitutional. If the term \"intuition\" is taken in its strict sense of a direct vision of a truth, seen in its own light to be necessary, by an intellectual act incapable of being resolved into more elementary processes of thought, then the existence of God is not a truth apprehended intuitively by men. The process whereby it is reached, whether spontaneously or by elaborate reasoning, em- braces many indubitable intuitions as elements, but no man apprehends God himself by a direct intuition. Because — (1.) Although the recognition of the divine exist- ence is necessary in the sense that the great majority of men recognize the truth, and are unable to disbelieve it even when they wish, and no one can do so without doing violence to his nature, yet it is not necessar}^ to thought in the sense that the non-existence of God is unthinkable. (2.) Because God mani- fests himself to us not immediately but mediately through his works, and there is always present, at least implicitly, an infer- ence in the act whereby the soul recognizes his presence and action. (3.) The true idea of God is exceedingly complex, and is reached by a complex process, whether spontaneous or not, involving various elements capable of analysis and description. On the other hand it is true that God manifests himself in his working in our souls and in external nature just as the invisible souls of our fellow-men manifest themselves, and we spontaneously recognize him just as we do them. We recog- nize them because (a) we are generically like them, and (5) their attributes are significally expressed in their words and actions. And we recognize God because (a) we have been made in his image, Avliich fact we spontaneously recognize (6) from his self- revelations in consciousness, especially in conscience, and from the characteristics of the external world. \"While the mental process which has been described — the theistic inference — is capable of analysis, it is itself synthetic. The principles on which it depends are so connected that the mind can embrace them all in a single act, and must include and apply them all in the apprehension of God. Will, intel- ligence, conscience, reason, and the ideas which they supply; 32 THE BEING OF GOD. cause, design, goudness, infinity, and the arguments which rest on these ideas — all coalesce into this one grand issue.\" — \"Theism\" by Prof. Flint, pp. 71, 72. 5. If the existence of God is spontaneously recognized hy all men under normcd conditions of consciousness, ivhat is the value of formal arguments to prove that existence ? And lohat are the arguments generally used? 1st. These arguments are of value as analyses and scientific verifications of the mental processes implicitly involved in the spontaneous re cognition of the self-manifestations of God. 2d. They are of i. ^e also for the purpose of vindicating the legitimacy of the :)rocess against the criticisms of skeptics. 3d. Also for the purpose of quickening and confirming the spon- taneous recognition by draAving attention to the extent and variety of the evidence to which it responds. 4th. The vari- ous arguments are convergent rather than consecutive. They do not all establish the same elements of the theistic concep- tion, but each establishes independently its separate element, and thus is of use («) in contributing confirmatory evidence that God is, and (Ij) complementary evidence as to ivhcd God is. They constitute an organic whole, and are the analysis and illustration of the spontaneous act whereby the mass of men have always recognized God. \"Although causality does not involve design, nor design goodness, design involves causality, and goodness both causality and design. The proofs of intelli- gence are also proofs of power; and the proofs of goodness are proofs of both intelligence and power. The principles of reason which compel us to think of the Supreme Moral Intelligence as self-existent, eternal, infinite, and unchangeable Being, supple- ment the proofs from other sources, and give self-consistency and completeness to the doctrine of theism.\" — \"Theism,\" Prof. Flint, pp. 73, 74. The usual arguments will be examined under the following heads : 1st. The Cosmological Argument, or the evidence for God's existence as First Cause. 2d. The Teleological Argument, or the evidence of God's existence aftbrded by the presence of order and adaptation in the universe. 3d. The Moral Argument, or the evidence afforded by the moral consciousness and history of mankind. 4th. The evidence afforded by the phenomena of Scripture and the supernatural history they record. 5th. The A priori Argument, and the testimony afforded by reason to God as the Infinite and Absolute. THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUM VT. 33 6. State the Cosmological Argument. It may be stated in tlie form of a syllogism, thus — Major Premise. — Every new existence or change in any thing previously existing must have had a cause pre-existing and adequate. 3Iinor Premise. — The universe as a whole and in all its parts is a system of changes. Conclusion. — Hence the universe must have a cause exterior to itself, and the ultimate or absolute caus'^^ must be eternal, uncaused, and unchangeable. 1st. As to the major premise; the caus/l judgment is in- tuitive and absolutel}^ universal and necesl -iry. It has been denied theoretically by some speculators, as Hume and Mill, but it is always used by them and all others in all their rea- soning as to the origin of the world, as well as of all things it contains. The judgment is unavoidable; the opposite is un- thinkable. Something exists now, therefore something must have existed from eternity, and that which has existed from eternity is the cause of that w^iicli exists now. It has been claimed that the causal judgment leads to an infinite regressive series of causes and effects. But this is absurd. (1.) The judgment is not that every thing must have a. cause, but that every new thing or change must have been caused. But that which is eternal and immutable needs no cause. (2.) An infinite series of causes and effects is absurd, for that is only a series of changes, wdiich is precisely that which demands a cause, and all the more imperatively in pro- portion to its length. A real cause, on the other hand, — that in which the causal judgment can alone absolutely rest, — must be neither a change nor a series of changes, but something uncaused, eternal and immutable. As a matter of fact all philosophers and men of science without exception assume the principles asserted. They all postulate an eternal, self-existent, imchangeable cause of the universe, whether a personal spirit, or material atoms, or a substance of wdiich both matter and spirit are modes, or an unconscious intelligent world-soul in union with matter. 2d. As to the minor premise. The fact that the universe as a whole and in all its parts is a system of changes is empha- sized by every principle and lesson of modern science. Every discovery in the fields of geology and astronomy, and all spec- ulation— as the nebular hypothesis and the hypothesis of evolu- tion— embody this principle as their very essence. But John Stuart Mill in his \"Essay on Theism,\" pp. 142, 143, says: \"There is in nature a permanent element, and also a 3J: THE BEING OF GOD. changeable: the changes are always the effects of previous changes; the permanent existences, so far as we know, are not effects at all. . . . There is in every object another and permanent element, viz., the specific elementary substance or substances of which it consists, and their inherent properties. These are not known as beginning to exist; within the range of human knowledge they had no beginning, consequently no cause; though they themselves are causes or concauses of every thing that takes place.\" \" Whenever a physical phenomenon is traced to its cause, that cause when analyzed is found to be a certain quantum of force, combined with certain collocations. The force itself is essentially one and the same, and there exists of it in nature a fixed quantity, which (if the the- ory of the conservation of forces be true) is never increased or diminished. Here then we find in the changes of material nature a permanent element, to all appearance the very one of which we are in quest. This it is apparently to which, if to any thing, we must assign the character of First Cause.\" — \"Essay on Theism,\" pp. 144, 145. We answer — (1.) The existence of \"Energy\" in any of its convertable forms dissociated from matter is absolutely un- thinkable. This is recognized as an unquestionable scientific truth by Stewart and Tait (\" Unseen Universe,\" p. 79). (2.) It is an obvious fact \"that all but an exceedingly small trac- tion of the light and heat of the sun and stars goes out into space, and does not return to them. In the next place the vis- ible motion of the large bodies of the universe is gradually being stopped by something which may be denominated ethe- rial friction,\" and at last they must fall together, and constitute by successive aggregations one mass. \"In fine the degradation of Energy of the visible universe proceeds, 'pari jpassii^ with the aggregation of mass. The very fact, therefore, that the large masses of the visible universe are of finite size, is suffi- cient to assure us that the process can not have been going on forever, or in other words that the visible universe must have had an origin in time\" — since (a) Energy remains aggregated iit finite quantities yet undiftused, and {h) since the matter of the universe still remains in separate masses. Thus the very law o,f the correlation of Energy to which Mill appeals proves, when really tested, that the visible imiverse had a beginning and will have an end. Stewart and Tait (\" Unseen Universe,\" p. 166). (3.) His assumption, also, that the matter of the uni- verse is in its ultimate atoms eternal and unchangeable, is un- proved and contrary to scientific analogy. Clark ]\\Iaxwell (in his address as President of the British Association for Advance- ment of Science, 1870) says: \"The exact equality of each mole- THE TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. 35 cule to all others of the same kind gives it, as Sir John Her- schell has well said, the essential character of a manufactured article, and precludes the idea of its being eternal and self-ex- istent.\" (4.) As a matter of fact all evolution theories as to the genesis of the universe necessarily postulate a commence- ment in time, and a primordial fire-mist. But this fire-mist can not be the First Cause the causal judgment demands, be- cause it is not eternal and immutable. If eternal it would be fully developed. If fully developed it could not develop into the universe. If immutable it could not pass into change. If not immutable it is itself, like the universe which issues from it, a transient condition of matter, like aJl other change de- manding for itself a cause. 7. State the Teleological Argument. Teleology from reAo?, end, and Xoyo'i, discourse, is the sci- ence of final causes, or of purposes or design as exhibited in the adjustments of parts to wholes, of means to ends, of organs to uses in nature. It is also familiarly called the Argument from Design ; and is ultimately based upon the recognition of the operations of an intelligent cause in nature. It may be profit- ably stated in two forms based respectively on the more general and the more special manifestations of that intelligence. First Form. Major Premise. — Universal order and harmony in the conspiring operation of a vast multitude of separate ele- ments can be explained only by the postulate of an intelligent cause. Minor Premise. — The universe as a whole and in all its parts is a fabric of the most complex and symmetrical order. Conclusion. — Therefore the eternal and absolute cause of the universe is an intelligent mind. Second Form. Major Premise. — The adjustment of parts and the adaptation of means to effect an end or purpose can be ex- plained only by reference to a designing intelligence and will. Minor Premise. — The universe is full of such adjustments of parts, and of organisms composed of parts conspiring to efi\"ect an end. Conclusion. — Therefore the First Cause of the universe must be an intelligent mind and wall. These arguments if valid amount to proving that God is an eternal self-existing Person. For the assumption of an un- conscious intelligence, or of an intelligence producing effects without the exercise of will is absurd. These phrases repre- sent no possible ideas. And intelligence and will together constitute personality. As to the first form of the argument it is evident that the 36 THE BEING OF GOD. very fact that science is possible is an indubitable proof that the order of nature is intellectual. Science is a product of the human mind, which is absolutely incapable of passing beyond the laws of its own constitution. Intuitions of reason, logical processes of analysis, inductive or deductive inference, imagi- nation, invention, and all the activities of the soul organize the scientific process. To all this external nature is found perfectly to correspond. Even the most subtle solutions of abstract mathematical and mechanical problems have been subsequently found by experiment to have been anticipated in nature. The laws of nature are expressions of numerical and geometrical harmonies, and are instinct with reason and beauty. Yet these laws although invariable under invariable conditions, are nei- ther eternal nor inherent in the elementary constitution of the universe. The properties of elemental matter are constant, but the laws which organize them are themselves complicated effects resulting from antecedent adjustments of these elements themselves under the categoi'ies of time, place, quantity, and quality. As these adjustments change the laws change. These adjustments, therefore, are the cause of these laws, and the ad- justments themselves must be the product either of chance, which is absurd, or of intelligence, which is certain. This intellectual order of nature is the first necessary postu- late of all science, and it is the essence of all the processes of the universe from the grouping of atoms to the revolution of worlds, from the digestion of a polyp to the functional action of the human brain. As to the second form of this Argument. — The principle of design presupposes the general intellectual order of the uni- verse and her laws, and presents in advance the affirmation that the character of the First Cause is further ma^iifested by the everywhere present evidence that these general laws are made to conspire by special adjustments to the accomplishment of ends evidently intended. This principle is illustrated by the mutual adjustments of the various provinces of nature, and especially by the vegetable and animal organisms, and the re- lations they involve, of organ to organism, of organism to in- stinct, and of single organisms and classes of organisms to each other and to their physical surroundings. In many cases the intention of these special adjustments is self-evident and undeniable, as in the case of the parts of the eye to the pur- pose of vision. In other cases it is more obscure and conject- in-al. In the present condition of science we can understand oidy in part, but froni the beginning the evidence of intel- ligent purpose has been transparent and overwhelming. A single sentence proves intelligence, although the context is OBJECTIONS TO THE TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. 37 undecipherable. But every advance of science discloses the same evidence over wider areas and in clearer light. 8. State and answer the objections to the theistic inference from the evidences of special design. 1st. Hume (\"Dialogues on Natural Religion,\" Pt. VII., etc.,) argues that our conviction that adaptation implies design is due to experience and cannot go beyond it. That our judg- ment that natural organisms imply design in their cause is an inference from the analogy of human contrivance, and its effects. He argues further that this analogy is false because — (1.) The human worker is antecedently known to us as an intelligent contriver, while the author of nature is antecedently unknown, and the very object sought to be verified by the theistic infer- ence. (2.) The processes of nature are all unlike the processes by which man executes his contrivances, and the formation of the world, and the institution of the processes of nature are peculiar effects of the like of which we have no experience. We answer — (1.) The argument rests upon a false assump- tion of fact. The human contriver, the soul of our fellow-man, is not antecedently known to us, nor is ever in any way known except by the character of the works by which he manifests himself And precisely in the same way and to the same ex- tent is the Author of natiue known. (2.) It rests on a false assumption of principle. The analogy of human contrivances is not the ground of our conviction that order and adaptation imply intelligence. It is a universal and necessary judgment of reason that order and adaptation can only spring from an intelhgent cause, or from accident, and that the latter supposi- tion is absurd. 2d. Some men of science, who have become habituated to the consideration of the universe as an absolute unit, all the pro- cesses of w^iich are executed by invariable general laws (a mode of thought in which for centuries science was anticipated by Augustinian Theology), object that in inferring intention from the adjustment of parts in special groups or systems, the natural theologian had mistaken a part for a whole, and an incidental effect of a general law, resulting from special and temporary conditions, for the real end of the law itself They hold that if even the First Cause of the universe were intelli- gent, it were infinitely absurd for men to presume to interpret his purpose from what we see of the special results of the working of laws working from infinite past time, through infi- nite space, and over an infinite system of conspiring parts. We ansiver — (1.) It is self-evident that the relations of the parts of a special whole conspiring to a special end may be 38 THE BEING OF GOD. fully understood, while the relations of that special whole to the general whole may be entirel}' unknown, although strong light is thrown even on this side by reason and revelation. A single bone of an unknown species of animal gives undeniable evidence of special adaptation, and may even, as scientists justly claim, throAv light beyond itself upon the constitution of that otherwise unknown whole to which it belonged. (2.) We con- fess that this criticism, although failing as to the argument from design, has force relatively to the mode iu which that argument has often been conceived. The older natural theolo- gians did often to too great a degree abstra(;t individual or- ganisms from the great dynamic whole of which they are products as well as parts. Dr. Flint (\"Theism,\" p. 159) well distinguishes between the intrioisic, the extrinsic^ and the ulti- mate ends of any special adjustment. Thus the intrinsic end of that special adjustment of parts called the eye is vision. Its extrinsic ends are the uses it serves to the animal it belongs to, and all the uses he serves to all he stands immediately or remotely related to. Its ultimate ei«;l is the end of the uni- verse itself \"Theism,\" p. 163 — \"When we affirm, then, that final causes in the sense of intrinsic ends are in things, we affirm merely that things are systematic unities, the parts of which are definitely related to one another, and co-ordinated to a common issue; and when we affirm that final causes in the sense of extrinsic ends are in things, we affirm merely that things are not isolated and independent systems, but systems definitely related to other systems, and so adjusted as to be parts or components of higher systems, and means to issues more comprehensive than their own.\" It is true indeed that a man can not discern the ultimate end of a part until he discerns the ultimate end of the whole, and that he can not discern all the extrinsic ends of any spe- cial system until he knows all its relations to all other special systems. Nevertheless, as a man who knows nothing of the relation of a given plant or animal to the flora or fauna of a continent, may be absolutely certain of the functions of the root or the claw in the economy of the plant or beast, so the manner in which all the parts which conspire to make a spe- cial whole are adapted to effect that end may be perfectl}' un- derstood, while we know nothing as yet of the extrinsic relation of that special whole to that which is exterior to itself 3d. It has been claimed in recent times by a certain class of scientists that evidence for the existence of God afibrded by the order and adaptation exhibited in the processes of nature has been very much weakened, if not absolutely invalidated, by the assumed probability of the alternative hypothesis of OBJECTIONS TO THE TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. 39 Evolution. There are many theories of Evolution, but the term in the general sense denotes the judgment that the state of the universe as a whole and in all its parts any one moment of time, has its cause in its state the immediately preceding moment, and that these changes have been brought about through the agency of powers inherent in nature, and that they may be traced back from moment to moment without any break of causal continuity through all past time. All possible theories of Evolution, considered in their rela- tion to theology, may be classified thus: (1.) Those which neither deny no^* obscure the evidence which the order and adaptation observed in nature afford to the existence of God, and his immanence in and providential control of his works. (2) Those which, while recognizing God as the original source in the remote past, to which the origination and the primary adjustments of the universe are to be referred, yet deny his immanence and constant providential activity in his works. (3.) Those which professedly or virtually obscure or deny the evidence afforded by the (jwder and adaptation of the universe for the existence and activity of God alike as Creator and as Providential Ruler. With the first class of Evolution theories the Natural Theo- logian has, of course, only the most friendly interest. As to the second class, which admits that a divine intelli- gence contrived and inaugurated the universe at the absolute beginning, yet deny that any such agent is immanent in the universe controlling its processes, we remark — (1.) That the point we have at present to establish is the eternal self-exist- ence of an intelligent First Cause, and not the mode of his relation to the universe. The latter question will be treated in subsequent chapters. (2.) It is far more philosophical, and more in accordance with a true interpretation of the scientifio principle of continuity, to conceive of the First Cause as imma- nent in the universe, and as organically concurring with all unintelligent second causes in all processes exhibiting power or intelligence. This is recognized by that large majority of scientific men who are either orthodox Theists, or who refer all the phenomena of the physical universe to the dynamic ac- tion of the divine will. (3.) The evidence afforded by man's moral consciousness and history and by revelation, to the im- manence and effective agency of God in all his works, is un- answerable. As to the third class of Evolution theories, which do either professedly or virtually obscure or deny the evidence afforded by order or contrivance to an intelligent First Cause of the Universe, as for example the theory of Darwin as to the differ- 40 THE BEING OF GOD. entiation of all organisms through accidental variations occumng through nnlimited time, ave remark — 1st. Every such scheme, when it is proposed as an account of the existing universe, must furnish a probable explanation of all classes of facts. It is notorious that every theory of purely natural Evolution fails utterly to explain the following facts: (1.) The origination of life. It could not have existed in the lire-mist. It could not have been generated by that whicli has no life. The mature decision of science to-day (1878) is expressed in the old axiom onme vivum ex vivo. (2.) The origin of sensation. (3.) Also of intelligence and will. (4). Also of conscience. (5.) The establishment of distinct log- ically corrolated and persistent types of genera and species, maintained by the law of hybridity. (6.) The origin of man. Prof A^irchow of Berlin, in his recent address at the German Association of Naturalists and Physicians at ]\\Iunich, says, \"You are aware that I am now specially engaged in the study of anthropology ; but I am bound to declare that every positive advance which we have made in the province of prehistoric anthropology has actually removed us further from the proof of such connection (i. e., the descent of man from any lower type).\" 2d. But even if continuous evolution could be pi-oved as a fact, the significance of the evidence of intelligent order and contrivance would not be in the least affected. It would only establish a method or system of means, but could in no degree alter the nature of the effect, nor the attributes of tlie real cause disclosed by them. (1.) The laws of abiogenesis, of reproduc- tion, of sexual differentiation and reproduction, of heredity, of variation, such as can evolve sensation, reason, conscience, and will out of atoms and mechanical energy, would all still remain to be accounted for. (2.) Laws are never causes, but always complicated modes of action resulting from the co-action of innumerable unconscious agents. Instead, therefore, of being explanations they are the very complex effects for which reason demands an intellectual cause. (3.) All physical laws result from the original properties of matter acting under the mutual condition of certain complicated adjustments. Change the ad- justments and the laws change. The laws which execute evo- lution, or rather into which the process of evolution is analyzed, must be referred back to the original adjustments of the ina- terial elements of the fire-mist. These adjustments, in whicli all future order and life is by hypothesis latent, must have been caused by chance or intelligence. Huxley in his \"Criti- cisms on Origin of Species,\" p. 330, founds the whole logic of Evolution on chance thus: It has been \"demonstrated that an THE MORAL ARGUMENT. 41 apparatus tliorouglily well-adapted to a particular purpose, may- be the result of a method of trial and error worked out by un- intelligent agents, as well as of the direct application of the means appropriate to that end by an intelligent agent.\" \"Ac- cording to Teleology, each organism is like a rifle bullet fired straight at a mark; according to Darwin organisms are like grape-shot, of which one hits something and the rest fall wide.\" The modern scientific explanation of the processes of the uni- verse by physical causes alone, to the exclusion of mind, differs from the old long-exploded chance theory, only by the acci- dents (a) of the juggling use of the words \"laws of nature,\" (/;) and the assumption that chance operating through indefi- nate duration can accomplish the work of intelligence. But as no man can believe that any amount of time will explain the form of flint knives and arrow heads, in the absence of human agents, or that any number of throws could cast a font of type into the order of letters in the plays of Shakespeare, so no man can rationally believe that the complicated and significantly intellectual order of the universe sprang from chance. (4.) In artificial breeding man selects. In \"natural selection\" nature selects. Hence, if the results are the most careful adjustments to effect purpose, it follows that that characteristic must be stamped upon the organisms by nature, and hence nature itself must therefore be intelligently directed, either (a) by an intel- ligence immanent in her elements, or in her whole as organized, or (6) by the original adjustment of her machinery by an intel- ligent Creator. 9. State the 3Ioral Argument, or the Evidence afforded by the 3Ioral Consciousness ayid History of mankind. The Cosmological argument led us to an eternal self-existent First Cause. The argument from the order and adaptation dis- covered in the processes of the universe revealed this great First Cause as possessing intelligence and will; that is, as a personal spirit. The moral or anthropological argument fur- nishes new data for inference, at once confirming the former conclusions as to the fact of the existence of a personal intelli- gent First Cause, and at the same time adding to the concep- tion the attributes of holiness, justice, goodness, and truth. The argument from design includes the argument from cause, and the argument from righteousness and benevolence includes both the arguments from cause and from design, and adds to them a new element of its own. This group of arguments may be stated thus: 1st. Consciousness is the fundamental ground of all knowl- edge. It gives us immediately the knowledge of self as exist- 42 THE BEING OF GOD. ing and as the subject of certain attributes, and the agent in certain forms of activity. Tliese souls and all their attributes must be accounted for. They have not existed from eternity. They could not have been evolved out of material elements, because — (1.) Consciousness testilies to their unity, simplicity, and spirituality. (2.) The laws of reason and the moral sense can not be explained as the result of transformed sense impres- sions modified by association derived by heredity (Mill and Spencer) ; for, (a) they are universally the same, ili) incapable of analysis, (c) necessary, and (c/) sovereign over all impulses. Therefore the human soul must have been created, and its Cre- ator must have attributes superior to his work. 2d. Man is essentially and universally a religious being. The sense of absolute dependence and moral accountability is inherent in his nature, universal and necessary. Conscience- always implies responsibility to a sujDerior, in moral authority, and therefore in moral character. It is especially implied in the sense of guilt which accompanies every violation of con- science. God is manifested and recognized in conscience as a holy, righteous, just, and intelligent will; i. e., a holy personal spirit. 3d. The adaptations of nature, as far as we can trace their relations to sentient beings, are characteristically beneficent, and evidence a general purpose to promote happiness, and to gratify a sense of beauty. This implies design, and design of a special esthetic and moral character, and proves that the First Cause is benevolent and a lover of beauty. 4th. The entire history of the human race, as far as known, discloses a moral order and purpose, which cannot be explained by the intelligence or moral purpose of the human agents con- cerned, which discovers an all-embracing unity of plan, com- prehending all peoples and all centuries. The phenomena of social and national life, of ethnological distribution, of the de- velopment and diffusion of civilizations and religions can be explained only by the existence of a wise, righteous, and be- nevolent ruler and educator of mankind. 10. State and answer the objections to the 3Ioral Argument. These objections are founded — 1st. On the mechanical in- variability of natural laws, and their inexorable disregard of the welfare of sentient creatures. 2d. The sufterings of irrational animals. 3d. The prevalence of moral and ph^^'sical evils among men. 4th. The unequal apportionment of providential favors, and the absence of all proportion between the measure of happiness allotted, and the respective moral characters of the recipients. OBJECTIONS TO MORAL ARGUMENT. 43 These difficulties, more or less trying to the faith of all, are the real occasion in the great majority of instances, of skep- tical atheism. John Stewart Mill in his \" Essay on Nature \" (\"Three Essays on Religion \") describes it as the characteristic of \"Nature\" ruthlessly to inflict suffering and death, and affirms that the cause of nature, if a personal will, must be a monster of cruelty and injustice. In his \" Essay on Theism,\" Pt. ii., he argues that the attempt to maintain that the author of nature, such as we know it, is at once omniscient and omnipotent and absolutely just and benevolent is abominably immoral. That he can be excused of cruelty and injustice only on the plea of limited knowledge or power, or both. He sums up his con- clusion from the evidence thus: \"A Being of great but limited power, how or by what limited we cannot even conjecture; of great and perhaps unlimited intelligence, but perhaps also more narrowly limited than his power : who desires and pays some regard to the happiness of his creatures, but who seems to have other motives of action which he cares more for, and who can hardly be supposed to have created the universe for that pur- pose only.\" In his \"Autobiography,\" cli. ii., he says of his fa- ther, James j\\Iill, \"I have heard him say, that the turning point of his mind on the subject was reading Butler's Analogy. That work, of which he always continued to speak with respect, kept him, as he said, for some considerable time, a believer in the divine authority of Christianity ; by proving to him, that what- ever are the difficulties of believing that the Old and New Tes- taments proceed from, or record the acts of, a perfectly wise and good being, the same and still greater difficulties stand in the way of the belief, that a being of such a character can have been the Maker of the universe. He considered Butler's argu- ment as conclusive against the only opponents for whom it was intended. Those who admit an omnipotent as well as perfectly just and benevolent j\\Iaker and Ruler of such a world as this, can say little against Christianity but what can with at least equal force be retorted against themselves. Finding, therefore, no halting place in Deism, he remained in a state of perplexity, until, doubtless after many struggles, he yielded to the conviction, that concerning the origin of things nothing whatever can be known.\" We answer — 1st. It is unquestionably true that God has not created the universe for the single purpose, or even for the chief purpose, of promoting the happiness of his creatures. Our reason and observation, and the Christian Scriptures, unite in revealing as far higher and more worthy ends of divine action the manifestation of his own glory, and the promotion by edu- cation and discipline of the highest excellence of his intelligent 44 THE BEING OF GOD. moral creatures. It is evident that the operation of inexorable general laws, and the mystery and sufferings incident to this life, may be the most effective means to promote those ends. 2d. The direct intention of all the organs with which sensi- tive creatures are endowed is evidently to promote their well- being; pain and misery are incidental. Even the sudden vio- lent deaths of irrational animals probably promote the largest possible amount of sentient happiness. 3d. Conscience has taught men in all ages that the sufferings incident to human life are the direct and deserved consequences of human sin, either penalties, or chastisements benevolently designed for our moral improvement. 4th. The origin of sin is a confessed mystery, relieved however by the consideration, that it results from the abuse of man's highest and most valuable endowment, responsible free agency, and by the tact revealed in the Chris- tian Scriptures that even sin will be divinely overruled to the fuller manifestation of the perfectioiis of God, and to the higher excellence and the more perfect happiness of the intelligent creation. 5th. The inequalities of the allotments of providence, and the disproportion between the well-being and the moral characters of men in this life, results from the fact that it is not the scene of rewards and punishments, and that different characters and different destinies require a different educational discipline, and it points to future readjustments revealed in the Bible (Ps. Ixxiii.). 6th. Neither the teleological nor the moral argument involves the assertion that \"vvith our present knowl- edge we are able to discern in the universe the evidences of either infinite or perfect wisdom or goodness. These are both indicated as matters of fact, and general characteristics of na- ture. But our discernment of both is necessarily limited by the imperfections of our knowledge. Even in the judgment of rea- son alone the infinite probability is that what appears to us anomalous, inconsistent either with perfect wisdom or perfect goodness, will be found, uj^on the attainment of more adequate information on our part, to illustrate those very perfections which we have been tempted to think they obscure. 11. State the Scriptural Evidence. Since man is a finite and guilty and morally corrupt creature it is unavoidable that the self-manifestations of God in nature should be imperfectly apprehended by him. That supernatural revelation which God has disclosed through an historical process of special interventions in chronological suc- cessions, interpreted by a supernaturally endoAved order of prophets, and recorded in the Christian Scriptures, supple- ments the light of nature, explains the mysteries of provi- THE A PRIORI ARGUMENT. 45 dence, and furnishes ns witli the principles of a true theodice. Tlie God whom nature veils while it reveals him, stands before lis unveiled in all the perfection of wisdom, holiness, and love in the person of Christ. He who hath seen Christ hath seen the Father. The truth of Theism is demonstrated in his per- son, and henceforth Avill never be held except by those who loyally acknowledge his Lordship over intellect and conscience and life. 12. State the principle upon luliicli the A priori arguments for the existence of God rest, the value of the prindjjle, and the p)rin- cipal forms in ivhich they have been presented. An a posteriori argument is one which logically ascends from facts of experience to causes, or principles. Thus by means of the preceding arguments we have been led from the facts of consciousness and of external nature to the knowl- edge of God as an intelligent and righteous personal spirit, the powerful, wise, and benevolent First Cause and jNloral Governor. An a pjnori argument is one which proceeds from the necessar}'- ideas of reason to the consequences necessarily deduced from them, or the truths necessarily involved in them. It is certain that the intuitions of necessary truth are the same in all men. 'Hiey are not generalizations from experience, but are presupposed in all experience. They bear the stamp of universality and necessity. They have objective validity, not depending upon the subjective state of personal conscious- ness, nor depending upon the nature of things, but anterior and superior to all things. What then can be the ground of eternal, necessary, universal, unchangeable truth, unless it be an infinite, eternal, self-existent, unchangeable nature, of whose essence they are. We have seen that our reasons can rest only in a cause itself uncaused. An uncaused cause must be eternal, self-ex- istent, and unchangeable. We have in our minds ideas and intuitions of infinity and perfection, as well as of eternity, self- existence, and immutability. \"These, unless they are wholly delusive — which is what we are unable to conceive — must be predicable of some being. The sole question is. Of what being? It must be of him who has been proved to be the First Cause of all things, the source of all the power, wisdom, and good- ness displayed in the universe. It can not be the universe itself, for that has been shown to be but an effect, to have before and behind it a Mind, a Person. It can not be our- selves, or any thing to which our senses can reach, seeing that we and they are finite, contingent, and imperfect. The author of the universe alone — the Father of our spirits, and the Giver 46 THE BEING OF GOD. of every good and perfect gift — can be uncreated, and uncon- ditioned, infinite, and perfect. This completes the idea of God so far as it can be reached or formed by natural reason. And it gives consistency to the idea. The conclusions of the a \"pos- ieriori arguments fail to satisfy either the mind or the heart until they are connected with and supplemented by, the intui- tion of the reason — infinity. The conception of any other than an infinite God — a God unlimited in all his perfections — is a self-contradictory conception which the intelligence refuses to entertain.\"— Dr. Flint, \"Theism,\" p. 291. 1. Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury (1093-1109), in his '\"'■ Monologium and ProsJogimn\" states the argument thus: We have the idea of an infinitely perfect being. But real exist- ence is a necessary element of infinite perfection. Therefore an infinitely perfect being exists, otherwise the infinitely per- fect as we conceive it would lack an essential element of perfection. 2. Des Cartes (1596-1650) in his ^^ IlecUiationcs de prima pMIosophia\" prop. 2, p. 89, states it thus: The idea of an infinitely perfect being which we possess could not have orig- inated in a finite source, and therefore must have been commu- nicated to us by an infinitely perfect being. He also in other connections claims that this idea represents an objective reality, because (1) it is pre-eminently clear, and ideas carry convic- tion of correspondence to truth in proportion to their clearness, and (2) it is necessary. 3. Dr. Samuel Clarke, in 1705, published his \"Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God.\" He argues that time and space are infinite and necessarily existent. But they are not substances. Therefore there must exist an eternal infinite substance of which they are properties. The Principal Anti-Theistic Theories.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "7", "sort_key": 7, "group": "Chapter II", "question": "What is Atheism ?", "answer": "Atheism, according to its etymology, signifies a denial of the being of God. It was applied by the ancient Greeks to Socrates and other philosophers, to indicate that they failed to conform to the popular religion. In the same sense it was applied to the early Christians. Since the usage of the term Theism has been definitely fixed in all modern languages, athe- ism necessarily stands for the denial of the existence of a per- sonal -Creator and jMoral Governor. Notwithstanding that the belief in a personal God is the result of a spontaneous recog- nition of God as manifesting himself in consciousness and the works of nature, atheism is still possible as an abnormal state of consciousness induced by sophistical speculation or by the indulgence of sinful passions, precisely as subjective idealism is ANTI-THEISTIC THEORIES. 47 possible. It exists in the following forms: 1. Practical, 2. Spec- ulative. Again Speculative Atheism may be (1) Dogmatic, as Avhen the conclusion is reached either (a) that God does not exist, or (IS) that the human faculties are positively incapable of ascertaining or of verifying his existence (e. ^., Herbert Spencer, \"First Principles,\" pt. 1). (2.) Skeptical, as when the existence is simply doubted, and the conclusiveness of the evi- dence generally relied upon is denied. (3.) Virtual, as when (ffl.) principles are maintained essentially inconsistent with the existence of God, or with the possibility of our knowledge of him : e. (/., by materialists, positivists, absolute idealists. (&.) When some of the essential attributes of the divine nature are denied, as by Pantheists, and by J. S. Mill in his \" Essays on Eeligion.\" (c.) When explanations of the universe are given which exclude (a^) the agency of an intelligent Creator and Governor, (6') the moral government of God, and the moral freedom of man, e. g., the theories of Darwin and Spencer, and Necessitarians generally. See Ulrici, \"God and Nature\" and \"Eeview of Strauss\"; Strauss, \"Old and New\"; Buchanan, \" Modern Atheism \" ; Tulloch, \"Theism\"; Flint, \"Theism.\"", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "8", "sort_key": 8, "group": "Chapter II", "question": "What is Dualism ?", "answer": "Dualism, in philosophy the opposite of Monism, is the doc- trine that there are two generically distinct essences. Matter and Spirit in the universe. In this sense the common doctrine of Christendom is dualistic. All the ancient pagan philosophers held the eternal independent existence of matter, and conse- quently all among them who were also Theists were strictly cosmological dualists. The religion of Zoroaster was a my- thological dualism designed to account for the existence of evil. Ormuzd and Ahriman, the personal principles of good and evil, sprang from a supreme abstract divinity, Akerenes. Some of the sects of this religion held dualism in its absolute form, and referred all evil to vXr/, self-existent matter. This principle dominated among the various spurious Christian Gnostic sects in the second century, and in the system of Manes in the third century, and its prevalence in the oriental world is manifested in the ascetic tendency of the early Chris- tian Church. See J. F. Clarke, \"Ten Religions\"; Hardwicke, \"Christ and other Masters\"; Neander's \" Chiu-ch History\"; Pressense, \" Early Years of Christianity\"; Tennemann, \"J\\lan- ual Hist. Philos.\"", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "9", "sort_key": 9, "group": "Chapter II", "question": "What is Polytheism?", "answer": "Polytheism (*oAu5 and Qsoi) distributes the perfectioms and functions of the infinite God among many limited gods. It 48 THE BEING OF GOD. sprang out of the nature-worship represented in the earliest Hindu Veds, so soon and so generally supplanting primitive monotheism. At first, as it long remained in Chaldea and Arabia, it consisted in the worship of elements, especially of the stars and of fire. Subsequently it took special forms from the traditions, the genius, and the relative civilizations of each nationality. Among the rudest savages it sank to Fetichism as in western and central Africa. Among the Greeks it was made the vehicle for the expression of their refined humanita- rianism in the apotheosis of heroic men rather than the revela- tion of incarnate gods. In India, springing from a pantheistic philosophy, it has been carried to the most extravagant ex- treme, both in respect to the number, and the character of its deities. Whenever polytheism has been connected with spec- ulation it appears as the exoteric counterpart of pantheism. Carlyle, \"Hero-worship\"; Max Mi!dler, \" Compar. Myth.,\" in Oxford Essays; Prof Tyler, \"Theology of Greek Poets.\"", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "25", "sort_key": 25, "group": "Chapter VII", "question": "What are their legitimate uses ?", "answer": "114: CREEDS AND COh^FESSIONS. They have been found in all ages of the church nseful for the following purposes. (1.) To mark, preserve, and dissemi- nate the attainments made in the knowledge of Christian truth by any branch of the church in any grand crisis of its devel- opment. (2.) To discriminate the truth from the glosses of false teachers, and accurately to define it in its integrity and due proportions. (3.) To act as the bond of ecclesiastical fel- lowship among those so nearly agreed as to be able to labor together in harmony. (4.) To be used as instruments in the great work of popular instruction. 3. What is fJie growid and extent of their authority, or poiver to bind the conscience? The matter of all these Creeds and Confessions binds the consciences of men only so far as it is purely scriptural, and because it is so. The form in which that matter is stated, on the other hand, binds only those wdio have voluntarily sub- scribed the Confession and because of that subscription. In all churches a distinction is made between the terms upon which private members are admitted to membership, and the terms upon which office-bearers are admitted to their sacred trusts of teaching and ruling. A church has no right to make any thing a condition of membership which Christ has not made a condition of salvation. The church is Christ's fold. The Sacraments are the seals of his covenant. All have a right to claim admittance who make a credil)le profession of the true religion, that is, who are presumptively the people of Christ. This credible profession of com-se involves a compe- tent knowledge of the fundamental doctrines of Christianity, a declaration of personal faith in Christ and of devotion to his service, and a temper of mind and a habit of life consistent therewith. On the other hand, no man can be inducted into any office in any church who does not profess to believe in the truth and wisdom of the constitution and laws it will be his duty to conserve and administer. Otherwise all harmony of sentiment and all efficient co-operation in action would be impossible. It is a universally admitted principle of morals that the animus imponeyitis, the sense in which the persons who impose an oath, or promise, or engagement, understand it, binds the conscience of the persons who bind themselves by oath or promise. All candidates for office in the Presb^-terian Church, therefore, do either personally believe the \"system of doctrine\" taught in oin- Standards, in the sense in which it has been historically understood to be God's truth, or solemnly lie to God and man. THE ANCIENT CREEDS. 115 4. Wliat ivere the Creeds of the ancient Church, which remain the common inheritance of all branches of the modern Church ? I. The Apostle's Creed, so called. This Creed gradually grew out of the comparison and assimilation of the Baptismal Creeds of the principal Cliurches in the West or Latin half of the ancient Church. Tlie most complete and popular forms of these baptismal creeds were those of Rome, Aquileja, Milan, Ravenna, Carthage, and Hippo, \"of which the Roman form, enriching itself by additions from others, gradually gained the more general acceptance. While the several articles considered separately are all of Nicene or Anti-nicene origin, the creed as a whole in its present form, can not be traced be^^ond the sixth century.\" — Schaff's \"Creeds of Christendom,\" vol. 1. p. 20. It was subjoined by the Westminster divines to their Cate- chism, together with the Lord's Prayer and Ten Command- ments. \" Not as thoiTgh it was composed by the apostles, or ought to be esteemed canonical Scripture, but because it is a brief sum of Christian faith, agreeable to the word of God, and anciently received in the Churches of Christ.\" It was retained by the framers of the Constitution of the Presbyterian Church in the United States as part of our Catechism. It is a part of the Catechism of the Methodist Episcopal Church also. \"It is used in the baptismal Confession of the Roman, English, Re- formed, Lutheran, Methodist Episcopal, and Protestant Epis- copal Cliurches.\" It is as follows: \"I believe in God the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth; and in Jesus Christ his only Son, onr Lord ; who was conceived by the Holy Ghost ; born of the Vii-giu Mary ; suffered under Pontius Pilate ; was crucified, dead and buried ; he descended into hell (Hades) ; the third day he rose again from the dead, he ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father almighty; from thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead. I believe in the Holy Ghost, the holy catholic church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the hfe everlasting. Amen. \" II. The Nicene Creed, in Avhich the true Trinitarian faith of the church is accurately defined in opposition to Arian and Semiarian errors. It exists in three forms, and evidently was moulded upon pre-existing forms similar to those from which the Apostles' Creed grew. 1st. The original form in which it was composed and en- acted by the QEcumenical Council of Nice, a. d. 325. \"We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of all things visible and invisible. \"And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten of the 116 CREEDS AND CONFESSIONS. Father, the only begotten; that is, of the essence of the Father, God of God, Light of Light, veiy God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance {oi,ioov6iov) with the Father; by ■whom all things were made, both in heaven and on earth; who for lis men, and for our salva- tion, came down and was incarnate, and was made man; he sviffered, and the third day he rose again, ascended into heaven; from thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead. \"And in the Holy Ghost. \" But those who say: ' There was a time when he was not; ' and, ' He was not before he was made;' and, 'He was made out of nothing,' or, 'He is of another substance' or 'essence,' or, 'The Son of God is created' or 'changeable,' or 'alterable' — they are condemned by the holy catholic and apostolic Church.\" 2d. The Nicaeno-Constantinopolitan Creed. This consists of the Niceiie Creed, above given, sKghtly changed in the first article, and witli the clanses defining- the Person and work of the Holy Ghost added, and the Anathema omittted. This new form of the Creed has been generally attributed to the Council of Constantinople, convened by the Emperor Theodosius, a. d. 381, to condemn the doctrine of the Macedonians, who denied the divinity of the Holy Ghost. These changes in the Nicene Creed were unquestionably made about that date, and the several \" clauses \" added existed previously in formularies pro- posed by individual theologians. But there is no evidence that the changes were made by the Council of Constanti- nople. They were, however, recognized by the Council of Chalcedon, a. d. 451. It is in this latter form that the Creed of Nice is now used in the Greek Church. 3d. The third or Latin form of this creed, in which it is used in the Roman, Episcopal, and Lutheran Churches, differs from the second form above mentioned only in (rf.) restoring the clause (\"Dens de Deo\") \"God of God,\" to the first clause; it belonged to the original Creed of Nice, but had been dropped out of the Greek Nicajno-Constantinopolitan form. (/>.) The famous '■'■ Filioque\" term was added to the clause affirming the procession of the Spirit from the Father. This was added by the provincial Council of Toledo, Spain, a. d. 589, and gradually accepted by the whole Western Church, and thence by all Protestants, without any oecumenical ratification. That phrase is rejected by the Greek Chiu'ch. The text of this Creed as received with reverence by all Catholics and Protestants is as follows (Schaff's \"Creeds of Christendom,\" pp. 25-29): \"I believe in one God the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible; and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten son of God, begotten of his Father before all worlds; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten not made, being of one substance with the Father; by whom aU things were made; Who THE ANCIENT CREEDS. 117 foi\" us men and for our salvation came down from lieaven, and was incar- nate by the Holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary, and was made man; He was crucified, also for us, under Pontius Pilate. He suffered and was buried; and the third day he rose again according to the Scriptures; and ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of the Father. And he shall come again wdth glory to judge both the quick and the dead; whose king- dom shall have no end. And I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of life, who proceedeth from the Father and the Son (this phrase \"filioque\" was added to the creed of Constantinople by the council of the western church held at Toledo, a. d. 589), who, with the Father and the Son together is worshipiaed and glorified, who spake by the prophets. And I believe one Catholic and Apostolic Church, I acknowl- edge one baptism for the remission of sins; and I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. \" III. The Athanasian Creed, so called, also styled, from its opening words, the symbol Quicunque vuU, is vulgarly ascribed to the great Athanasius, bishop of Alexandria, from about A. D. 328 to A. D. 373, and the leader of the orthodox party in the church in opposition to the arch heretic, Arius. But modern scholars unanimously assign to it a later origin, and trace it to Northern Africa and the school of Augustine. Big- ham refers it to Virgilius Tapsensis at the end of the fifth cen- tury. Schaff says its complete form does not appear before the end of the eighth century. Tliis Creed is received in the Greek, Roman, and English Churches, but it has been left out of the Prayer Book of the Episcopal Church of America. It presents a most admirably stated exposition of the faith of all Christians, and it is objected to only because of the \" damnatory clauses,\" which ought never to be attached to any human composition, especially one mak- ing such nice distinctions upon so profound a subject. It is as follows: \" 1. Whosoever wishes to be saved, it is above all necessary for him to hold the Catholic faith. 2. Which, unless each one shall jjreserve perfect and inviolate, he shall certainly* perish for ever. 3. But the CathoHc faith is this, that we worship one God in trinity, and trinity in unity. 4. Neither confounding the persons, nor separating the sub- stance. 5. For the jjerson of the Father is one, of the Son another, and of the Holy Ghost another. 6. But of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost there is one divinity, equal glory and co-eternal majesty. 7. What the Father is, the same is the Son, and the Holy Ghost. 8. The Father is uncreated, the Son uncreated, the Holy Ghost uncreated. 9. The Father is immense, the Son immense, the Holy Ghost immense. 10. The Father is eternal, the Son eternal, the Holy Ghost eternal. 11. And yet there are not three eternals, but one eternal. 12. So there ai'e not three (beings) uncreated, nor three immense, but one uncreated, and one immense. 13. In like manner the Father is omnipotent, the Son is omnii^otent, the Holy Ghost is omnipotent. 14. And yet there are not three omnipotents, but one omnipotent. 15. Thas the Father is God, the Son is God, the Holy Ghost is God. 118 CREEDS AND CONFESSIONS. 16. And yet there are not three Gods, but one God. 17. Thus the Father is Lord, the Son is Lord, and tlie Holy Ghost is Lord. 18. And yet there are not three Lords, but one Lord. 19. Because as we are thus compelled by Christian verity to confess each person severally to be God and Lord; so we are prohibited by the Catholic religion from saying that there are three Gods or Lords. 20. The Father was made from none, nor created, nor begotten. 21. The Son is from the Father alone, neither made, nor created, but begotten. 22. The Holy Ghost is from the Father and the Son, neither made, nor created, nor begotten, but proceeding. 23. Therefore there is one Father, not three fathers, one Son, not three sons, one Holy Ghost, not three Holy Ghosts. 24. And in this trinity no one is first or last, no one is greater or less. 25. But all the three co-eternal persons are co-equal among themselves; so that through all, as is above said, both unity in trinity, and trinity in unity is to be worshiiii^ed. 26. Therefore, he who wishes to be saved must think thus concerning i\\\\Q trinity. 27. But it is necessary to eternal salvation that he should also faithfully believe the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ. 28. It is, therefore, true faith that we beheve and confess that our Lord Jesus Christ is both God and man. 29. He is God, generated from eternity from the substance of the Father; man, born in time from the substance of his mother. 30. Perfect God, per- fect man, subsisting of a rational soul and human flesh. 31. Equal to the Father in respect to his divinity, less than the Father in respect to his humanity. 32. Who, although he is God and man, is not two but one Christ. 33. But one, not from the conversion of his divinity into flesh, but from the assumption of his humanity into God. 34. One not at all from confusion of substance, but from unity of person. 35. For as a rational soul and flesh is one man, so God and man is one Christ. 36. Who .sutfered for our salvation, descended into hell, the third day rose from the dead. 37. Ascended to heaven, sitteth at the right hand of God the Father omnii^otent, whence he shall come to judge the living and the dead. 38. At whose coming all men shall rise again with their bodies, and shall render an account for their own works. 39. And they who have done well shall go into life eternal; they who have done evil into eternal fire. 40. This is the Cathohc faith, which, unless a man shall faithfully and firmly believe, he can not be saved. \" IV. The Creed op Chalcedon. The Emperor JMarcianiis called the fourth oecumenical council to meet at Chalcedon in Bithvnia, on the Bosphorus, opposite Constantinople, to put down the Eutychian and Nestorian heresies. The Council con- sisted of 630 bishops and sat from Oct. 8 to Oct. 31, a. u. 451. The principal part of the \"Definition of Faith\" agreed upon by this Covnicil is as follows: \"We, then, following the holy Fathers, all with one consent, teach men to confess, one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ; the same perfect in Godhead and also perfect in Manhood; truly God, and truly Man, of a reasonable soul and body; consubstantial with the Father ac- cording to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the Manhood ; in all things like unto us without sin ; begotten before aU ages of the Father according to the Godhead, and in these latter days, for us and for our salvation, born of Mary the Virgin Mother of God according to the Manhood. He is one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, CONFESSIONS OF ROMAN CHURCH. 119 Only-begotten, existing in two natures witliont mixture {d6vyxvri:^%), without change («r/3*';rroo;), without division [ddiaifiiroai), without separation ((t'^ojp/oroj?); the diversity of the two natures not being at all destroyed by their union, but the peculiar proi^erties of each nature being preserved, and concurring to one person and one subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son, and Only- begotten, God the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ; as the prophets from the beginning have declared concerning Him, and as the Lord Jesus Christ Himself hath taught us, and as the Creed of the holy fathers has delivered to us.\" This completed the development of the orthodox Church doctrine of the Trinity of Persons in the one God, and of the duality of natures in the one Christ. It remains a universally respected statement of the common faith of the Church.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "26", "sort_key": 26, "group": "Chapter VII", "question": "Wlmt are the doctrinal Stamlards of the Church of Rome?", "answer": "Besides the above mentioned Creeds, all of which are of recognized authority in the Romish Church, their great Stand- ards of Faith are — 1st. The ^^ Canons and Decrees of the Cowwil of Trent,'' which they regard as the twentieth oecumenical council, and was called by Pope Pius IV. to oppose the progress of the Eeformation (a. d. 1545-1563). The decrees contain the pos- itive statements of Papal doctrine. The canons explain the decrees, distribute the matter under brief heads, and condemn the opposing doctrine on each point. Although studiously am- biguous, the system of doctrine taught is evidently though not consistently Semipelagian. 2d. The '■''Boman Catechism\" which explains and enforces the canons of the Council of Trent, was prepared by order of Pius IV. and promulgated by the authority of Pope Pius V., A. D. 1566. 3d. The '■'■Creed of F ope Pius IV.\" also called ^'•Prqfessio Fidei Tridentime\" or '■'■Forma Professionis Fidel CcdhoUcx^\" con- tains a summary of the doctrines taught in the Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent, and was promulgated in a bull by Pope Pius IV., a. d. 1564. It is subscribed to by all grades of Papal teachers and ecclesiastics, and by all converts from Protestantism, It is as follows: \"I, A. B., believe and profess with a firm faith all and every one of the things which are contained in the symbol of faith which is used in the holy Eoman Church; namely, I believe in one God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invis- ible; and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only -begotten Son of God, be- gotten of the Father before all worlds; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, consvibstantial with the Father, by whom all things were made ; who for us men and for our salvation 120 CREEDS AND CONEESSIONS. came down from heaven, and was incarnate by tlie Holy Ghost of the Vii'gin Mary, and was made man; Was crucified for lis under Pontius Pilate, suti'ered and was buried, and rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, and ascended into heaven, sits at the right hand of the Father, and A\\'ill come again with glory to judge the living and the dead, of whose kingdom there will be no end; and in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Life-giver, Avho proceeds from the Father and the Son, who, together with the Father and the Son, is adored and glorified, who spake by the holy prophets; and one holy catholic and apostolic Church. I confess one baj^tism for the remission of sins, and I expect the resur- rection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen. \"I most firmly admit and embrace the apostolic and ecclesiastical traditions, and all other constitutions and observances of the same Church. I also admit the sacred Scriptures according to the sense which the holy mother Church has held and does hold, to whom it belongs to judge of the true sense and interpretation of the Scriptures; nor will I ever take or intei'pret them otherwise than accoi-diug to the unanimous consent of the fathers. I profess, also, that there are truly and properly seven sacraments of the new law, instituted by Jesus Christ our Lord, and necessary for the salvation of mankind, though all are not neces- sary for every one — namely baptism, confirmation, eucharist, penance, extreme unction, orders, and matrimony, and that they confer gi'ace; and of these, baj)tism, confirmation, and order can not be reiterated without sacrilege. I do also receive and admit the ceremonies of the Catholic Church, received and approved in the solemn administration of all the above-said sacraments. I receive and embrace all and every one of the things which have been defined and declared in the holy Council of Trent concerning sin and justification. I profess likewise that in the mass is ofiered to God a true, projjer, and propitiatory sacri- fice for the living and the dead; and that in the most holy sacrament of the eucharist there is truly, really, and substantially the body and blood, together with the soul and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, and that there is made a conversion of the whole substance of the bread into the body, and of the whole substance of the wine into the blood, which conversion the Catholic Church calls transubstantiation. I confess, also, that under either kind alone, Christ whole and entire, and a true sacra- ment is received. I constantly hold that there is a purgatory, and that the souls detained therein are heliied by the suflrages of the faithful. Lilvewise that the saints reigning together with Christ are to be honored and invoked, that they offer prayers to God for us, and that their relics are to be venerated. I most firmly assert that the images of Christ, and of the mother of God ever Virgin, and also of the other saints, are to be had and retained, and that due honor and veneration are to be given to them. I also affirm that the power of indulgences was left by Christ in the Church, and that the use of them is most wholesome to Christian people. I acknowledge the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, the mother and mistress of all churches; and I jjromise and swear true obe- dience to the Roman bishop, the successor of St. Peter, jji-ince of the apostles, and vicar of Jesus Christ. I also profess, and undoubtedly receive all other things delivered, defined, and declared by the sacred canons and general councils, and particularly by the holy Council of Trent [and by the Oecumenical Vatican Council delivered, defined, and declared, particularly concerning the primacy and infallible rule of the Koman Pontiff*] •Added by Decree of the \"Sacred Congregation of the Coimcil,\" Jan. 2, 1877. CONFESSIONS OF ROMAN AND GREEK CHURCHES. 121 \"And likewise I also condemn, reject, and anathematize all tliina:s contrary thereto, and all heresies whatsoever condemned, rejected and anathematized by the Ohvirch. This true Catholic faith, out of which none can be saved, which I now freely profess and truly hold, I., A. B., promise, vow and swear most constantly to hold, and profess the same whole and entire, with God's assistance, to the end of my life; and to procure as far as lies in my power, that the same shall be held, taught and preached by all who are under me, or who are intrusted to my care, in virtue of my office, so help me God, and these holy gospels of God — ^Amen,\" 4th. Tlie Holy CEciimenical Vatican Council assembled at the call of Pins IX. in the Basilica of the Vatican, Dec. 8, 1869, and continued its sessions until October 20, 1870, after which it was indefinitely postponed. The Decrees of this Council embrace two sections. I. \"The Dogmatic Constitution on the Catholic Faith.\" This embraces four chapters. Chap. 1 treats of God as Cre- ator ; chap. 2, of revelation ; chap. 3, of faith ; chap. 4, of faith and reason. These are followed by eighteen canons, in which the errors of modern rationalism and infidelity are condemned. II. \"First Dogmatic Constitution on the Church of Christ.\" This also embraces four chapters. Chap. 1 is entitled \"Of the Institution of the Apostolic Primacy in Blessed Peter;\" chap. 2, \"Of the Perpetuity of the Primacy of Blessed Peter in the Ro- man Pontiffs ; \" chap. 3, \" On the Power and Nature of the Primacy of the Iloman Pontiff;\" chap. 4, \"Concerning the In- fallible Teaching of the Roman Pontiff.\" \"The new features are contained in the last two chapters, which teach Papal Abso- lutism, and Papal InfalUbilify.'' These definitions are presented to a sufficient extent under Chapter V. of these \"Outhnes.\" In consequence of this principle of Papal Infallibility it nec- essarily follows, that the whole succession of Papal Bulls, and especially those directed against the Jansenists and the Decree of Pius IX. \"On the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin jMary,\" Dec. 8, 1854; and his Syllabus of Errors, Dec. 8, 1864, are all infallible and irreformable and parts of the amazing Standards of Faith professed by the Roman Church.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "27", "sort_key": 27, "group": "Chapter VII", "question": "JVJiat are the Doctrinal Standards of the Greek Church ?", "answer": "The ancient church divided, from causes primarily political and ecclesiastical, secondarily doctrinal and ritual, into two great sections — the Eastern or Greek Church, and the West- ern or Latin Church. This division began to culminate in the seventh, and was consummated in the eleventh century. The Greek Church embraces about eighty millions of people, the majority of the Christians iidiabitants of the Turkish Empire, and the national churches of Greece and Russia. All the Prot- 122 CREEDS AND CONFESSIONS. estant Churches have originated from the Western or Latin division of the church. She arrogates to herself, pre-eminently, the title of \"Ortho- dox,\" because the original oecumenical Creeds defining the doctrines of the Trinity and the Person of Christ were pro- duced in the Eastern division of the ancient church and in the Greek language, and hence are in a special sense her inheri- tance, and because from the fact that her theology is absolutely unprogressive, she contents herself with the literal repetition of the old formulas. She adheres to the ancient Creeds and doctrinal decisions of the first seven oecumenical councils, and possesses a few modern Confessions and Catechisms. The most important of these are — 1st. The \"Orthodox Confession of the Catholic and Apostolic Greek Chiirch,\" composed by Peter Mogilas, IMetropolitan of Kieff in Russia, a. d. 1643, and approved by all the Eastern Patriarchs. 2d. The \"Decrees of the Synod of Jerusalem,\" or the Con- fession of Dositheus, 1672. 3d. The Piussian Catechisms which have the sanction of the Holy Synod, especially the Longer Catechism of Philaret, Met- ropolitan of Moscow, 1820-1867, unanimously approved by all the Eastern Patriarchs, and since 1839 generally used in the schools and churches of Ilussia. The Decrees of the Synod of Jerusalem teach substantially though less definitely the same doctrine as those of the Council of Trent as to the Scriptures and Tradition, good works and faith, justification, the sacraments, the sacrifice of the mass, the worship of saints, and purgatory. The Catechism of Philaret \" approaches more nearly to the evangelical principle of the supremacy of the Bible in matters of Christian faith and life than any other deliverance of the Eastern Church.\" — Scliaff's \"Creeds of Christendom,\" Vol. I., pp. 45 and 71.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} -{"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "28", "sort_key": 28, "group": "Chapter VII", "question": "What are the Dodrinal Standards of the Lvtheran Church?", "answer": "Besides the great General Creeds which they receive in common with all Christians their Symbolical Books are — _ 1st. The Ati(/.'ihi(rc/ Confession, the joint authors of which were Luther and Melanchthon. Having been signed by the Protestant princes and leaders, it was presented to the em- peror and imperial diet in Augsburg, a. d. 1530. It is the oldest Protestant Confession, the ultimate basis of Lutheran theology, and the only universally accepted standard of the Lutheran Churches. It consists oi' two grand divisions. The LUTHERAN CONFESSIONS. 123 first embracing twenty-one articles, presents a positive state- ment of Christian doctrines as the Lutherans understand them ; and the second, embracing* seven articles, condemns the prin- cipal characteristic errors of the Papacy. It is evangelical in the Augustinian sense, although not as precise in statement as the more perfect Calvinistic Confessions, and it, of course, con- tains the germs of the peculiar Lutheran views as to the neces- sity of the Sacraments, and the relation of tlie saca-amental signs to the grace they signify. Yet these peculiarities are so far from being explicitly stated, that Calvin found it consistent with his views of divine truth to subscribe this great Confes- sion during his residence in Strasburg. In 1540, ten years after it had been adopted as the public symbol of Protestant Germany, Melanchthon produced an edi- tion in Latin wdiicli he altered in several particulars, and which was hence distinguished as the Variata, the original and only authentic form of the Confession being distinguished as the Invariata. The principal changes introduced in this edition incline towards Synergistic or Arminian views of divine grace on the one hand, and on the other to simple views as to the sacraments more nearly corresponding with those prevailing among the Reformed Churches. — See Shedd's \" Hist, of Christ. Doctrine,\" Book vii., chap. 2. See also the accurate and learn- edly illustrated edition of the Augsburg Confession by Rev. Charles Krauth, D.D. 2d. The Apohgi/ (Defence) of the Augsburg Confession, pre- pared by Melanchthon, a. d. 1530, and subscribed by the Pro- testant theologians, a. d. 1537, at Smalcald. 3d. The Larger and Smaller Cateddsms prepared by Luther, A. D. 1529, \"the first for the use of preachers and teachers, the last as a guide for youth.\" 4th. The Articles of Smalcald, drawn up by Luther, a. d. 1536, and inscribed by the evangelical theologians in February, A. D. 1537, at the place whose name they bear. 5th. The Formula Concordice (Form of Concord), prepared in A. D. 1577 by Jacob Andreas and Martin Chenniitz and others for the purpose of settling certain controversies which had sprung up in the Lutheran Church, especially («) concern- ing the relative action of divine grace and the human will in regeneration, (h) cojicerning the nature of the Lord's presence in the Eucharist. This Confession contains a more scientific and tiioroughly dev^eloped statement of the Lutheran doctrine than can be found in any other of their public symbols. Its authority is, however, acknowledged only by the high Lu- theran party, that is, by that party in the church which con- sistently carries the peculiarities of Lutheran theology out to 124 CREEDS AND CONFESSIONS. the most complete logical development. All these Lutheran S^'mbols niaj be found in Latin accurately edited in \" Libri Sjmbolici,\" by Dr. C. A. Hase, Leipsic, 1836, and in Schaflf's \"Creeds of Christendom.\" 8. What are the principal Confessions of the Reformed or Cal- vinistic Churches ? The Confessions of the Keformed Churches are very consid- erable in number, and vary somewhat in character, although they substantially agree in the system of doctrines they teach. 1st. \"The oldest Confession of that branch of Protestantism which was not satisfied with the Lutheran tendency and sym- bol is the Confessio Tetrapolitana, — so-called, because the theo- logians of four cities of upper Germany, Strasburg, Constance, Memmingen, and Lindau, drew it up, and presented it to the emperor at the same diet of Augsburg, in 1530, at wdiich the first Lutheran symbol was presented. The principal theolo- gian concerned in its construction was Martin Bucer, of Stras- burg. It consists of twenty-two articles, and agrees generally with the Augsburg Confession. The points of difference per- tain to the doctrine of the sacraments. Upon this subject it is Zwinglian. These four cities, however, in 1532 adopted the Augsburg Confession, so that the Confessio Tetrapolitana ceased to be the formally adopted symbol of any branch of the church.\" — Shedd's \"Hist, of Christ. Doctrine,\" Book vii., chap. 2. 2d. The Reformed Confessions of the highest authority among the chm-ches are the following: (1.) The Second Helvetic Confession, prepared by Bullinger, A. D. 1564, and published 1566, superseded the First Helvetic Confession of a. d. 1536. It was adopted by all the Eeformed Churches in Switzerland \\vith the exception of Basle (which was content with the old Confession) and by the Reformed Churches in Poland, Hungary, Scotland and France, and it has always been esteemed as of the highest authority by all the Reformed Churches. (2.) The Heidelberg Catechism, prepared by Ursinus and Ole- vianvis a. d. 1562. It was established by civil authority as the doctrinal standard as well as the instrument of religious in- striu'tion for tlie churches of the. Palatinate, a German state at that time including both banks of tlie Rhine. It was indorsed by the Synod of Dort, and is a doctrinal standard of the Re- formed Churches of Germany and Holland, and of the [German and Dutch] Reformed Churches in America. It was used for the instruction of children in Scotland, before the adoption of the Catechisms of the AVestminster Assembly, and its use was sanctioned by an unanimous vote of the first General Assembly REFORMED CONFESSIONS. 125 of the reunited Presbyterian Church in the United States a. d. 1870.— See Minutes. (3.) The Thirty -nine Articles of the Church of England. In 1552, Cranmer, with the advice of other bishops, drew up the Forty-tivo Articles of Religion, and which were pubhshed by royal authority in 1553. These Avere revised and reduced to the number of thirty-nine by Archbishop Parker and otlier bishops, and ratified by both houses of Convocation, and pub- lished by royal authority in 1563. They constitute the doc- trinal standard of the Protestant Episcopal Churches of Eng- land, Ireland, Scotland, the Colonies, and the United States of America. The question whether these Articles are Calvinistic or not has been very unwarrantably made a matter of debate. See Lawrence's \"BamptonvLecture\" for 1804 on the Arminian side, and Toplady's \" Doctrinal Calvinism of the Cliurch of England,\" Dr. Goode's \"Doctrine of Church of England as to Effects of Infant Baptism,\" and Dr. William Cunningham's \" Keformers and their Theology,\" on the Calvinistic side. The seventeenth Article on Predestination is perfectly decisive of the question, and is as follows : \"Predestination to life is the everlasting pnrpose of God, whereby (before the foundations of the world were laid) he hath constantly decreed by his cou^nsel, secret to ris, to deliver from curse and damnation those whom he hath chosen in Christ out of mankind, and to bring them by Christ to everlasting salvation, as vessels made to honor. Wherefore they which he endued with so excellent a benefit of God, he called according to God's purpose by his Sj^irit working in due season : they, through grace, obey the calling; they he justified freely; they he made sons of God by adoption; they he made like the image of his only be- gotten Son, Jesus Christ; they walk religiously in good works, and at length, by God's mercy, they attain to everlasting feHcity. \"As the godly consideration of predestiBation and our election in Christ is full of sweet, pleasant, and unsj^eakable comfort to godly per- sons, and such as feel in themselves the working of the Spirit of Christ, mortifying the works of the flesh and their earthly members, and draw- ing up their mind to high and heavenly things, as well because it doth greatly establish and confirm their faitli of eternal salvation to be enjoyed through Christ, as because it doth fervently kindle their- love toward God. So, for curious and carnal persons, lacking the S^jirit of Christ, to have continually before their eyes the sentence of God's predestination, is a most dangerous downfall, whereby the devil doth thrust them either into desperation, or into wretchedness of most unclean living, no less perilous than desjjeration. \"Furthermore, we must receive God's promises in such wise as they be generally set forth to us in Holy Scripture; and, in our doings, that will of God is to be followed which we have expressly declared unto us in the word of God. \" These Articles purged of their Calvinism and reduced in number to twenty-five, including a new political Article (the 126 CREEDS AND CONFESSIONS. twenty-third) adopting as an article of faitli the political system of the United States Gfwernment, constitute the doctrinal Stand- ard of the Methodist Episcopal Church in America. (4.) The Canons of the Synod of Dort. This famous Synod was convened in Dort, Flolland, by the authority of the States General, for the purpose of settling the questions brought into controversy by the disciples of Arminius. Its sessions contin- ued from Nov. 13, a. d. 1()18, to May 9, a. d. 1619. It consisted of pastors, elders, and theological professors from the churciies of Holland, and deputies from the churches of England, Scot- land, Hesse, Bremen, the Palatinate, and Switzerland. The Canons of this Synod were received by all the Eeformed Churches as a true, accurate, and eminently authoritative ex- hibition of the Calvinistic S3\\stem of theology. Tliey consti- tute in connection with the Heidelberg Catechism the doc- trinal Confession of the Reformed Church of Holland and of its daughter the [Dutch] Reformed Church in America. (5.) The Confession and Catechisms of the Westminster Assem- hly. This Assembly of Divines was convened by an act of the Long Parliament passed June 12, 1643. The original call em- braced ten lords and twenty commoners as lay members, and one hundred and twenty-one divines — twenty ministers being afterward added — all shades of opinion as to Church Govern- ment being represented. The body continued its sessions from 1st of July, 1643, to 22d of February, 1649. The Confession and Catechisms they produced were immediately adopted by the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland. The Con- gregational Convention, also, called by Cromwell to meet at Savoy, in London, a. d. 1658, declared their approval of the doctrinal part of the Confession and Catechisms of the West- minster Assembly, and conformed their own deliverance, the Savoy Declaration, very nearly to it. Indeed \" the difference between these two Confessions is so very small, that the mod- ern Independents have in a manner laid aside the use of it (Savoy Declaration) in their families, and agreed with the Presbyterians in the use of the Assembly's Catechisms.\" — Neal, \"Puritans,\" II., 178. This Confession together with the Larger and Smaller Catechisms is the doctrinal standard of all the Presbyterian b(xlies in tiie world of English and Scotch deri- vation. It is also of all Creeds the one most highly approved by all bodies of Congregationalists in England and America. All of the Assemblies convened in New England for the purpose of settling the doctrinal basis of their churches have either indorsed or explicitly adopted this Confession and these' Catechisms as accm-ate expositions of their own faith. This was done by the Synod which met at Cambridge, Massachu- REFORMED CONFESSIONS. 127 setts, June, 1647, and again August, 1648, and prepared the Camhridge Platform. And it was done again by the Synod which sat in Boston, September, 1679, and May, 1680, and' pro- duced the Boston Confession. And again by the Synod which met at Saybrook, Connecticut, 1708, and produced tlie Say- brook Platform. 3d. There remain several other Reformed Confessions, which, although they are not the doctrinal standards of large denomi- nations of Christians, are nevertheless of high classical interest and authority because of their authors, and the circumstances under which they originated. (1.) The ^^Co7isensus Tigurinus\" or the ^^ Consensus of Zurich,'' or \"The mutual consent with respect to the doctrine of the sacrament of the ministers of the Church of Zurich and John Calvin, minister of the Church of Geneva.\" It consisted of twenty-six Articles, and deals exclusively with the questions relating to the Lord's Supper, and it was drawn by Calvin, A. D. 1549, for the purpose of bringing about a mutual consent among all parties in the Eeformed Church on the subject of which it treats. It was subscribed by the Churches of Zurich, Geneva, St. (iall, Schaffhausen, the Grisons, Neuchatel, and Basle, and was received with favor by all parts of the Re- formed Church, and remains an eminent monument of the true mind of the Reformed Church upon this so much debated question; and especially it is of value as setting forth with eminent clearness and unquestionable authority the real opin- ions of Calvin on the subject, deliberately stated after he had ceased from the vain attempt to secure the unity of Protestant- ism by a compromise with the Lutheran views as to the Lord's presence in the Eucharist. An accurate translation of this im- portant document will be found in the iVppendix. (2.) The ^'Consensus Genevensis'' was drawn up by Calvin, A. D. 1552, in the name of the Pastors of Geneva, and is a com- plete statement of Calvin's views on the subject of Predestina- tion. It was designed to unite all the Swiss Churches in their views of this great doctrine. It remains a pre-eminent monu- ment of the fundamental principles of true Calvinism. (3.) The ''Formula Consensus Helvetica,'' composed at Zurich, A. D. 1675, by John Henry Heidegger of Zurich, assisted by Francis Turretin of Geneva and Luke Gender of Basle. Its title is \"Form of agreement of the Helvetic Reformed Churches respecting the doctrine of universal grace, the doctrines con- nected therewith, and some other points.\" It was designed to unite the Swiss Churches in condemning and excluding that modified form of Calvinism, which in that century emanated from the Theological School of Saumur, represented by Amyral- 128 CREEDS AND CONFESSIONS. dns, Placfeus, etc. This is tlie most scientific and thorongli of all the Retbnned Confessions. Its eminent authorship* and the fact that it distinctively represents the most thoroughly con- sistent school of old Calvinists gives it high classical interest. It was subscribed by nearly all the Swiss Churches, but ceased to have public authority as a Confession since A. d. 1722.t All the Confessions of the Reformed Churches may be found col- lected in one convenient volume in the \"Collectio Confessionum in Eoclesiis Reformatis publicatarum,\" by Dr. H. A. Niemeyer, Leipsic, 1840, and in Dr. Schaif 's \" Creeds of Christendom.\" * See Herzog's Keal- Encyclopedia. Bomberger's translation. Article, \"Helvetic Confessions.\" t An accurate translation will be found in the Appendix.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "28", "sort_key": 28, "group": "Chapter VII", "question": "What are the Dodrinal Standards of the Lvtheran Church?", "answer": "Besides the great General Creeds which they receive in common with all Christians their Symbolical Books are — 1st. The Ati(/.'ihi(rc/ Confession, the joint authors of which were Luther and Melanchthon. Having been signed by the Protestant princes and leaders, it was presented to the em- peror and imperial diet in Augsburg, a. d. 1530. It is the oldest Protestant Confession, the ultimate basis of Lutheran theology, and the only universally accepted standard of the Lutheran Churches. It consists oi' two grand divisions. The LUTHERAN CONFESSIONS. 123 first embracing twenty-one articles, presents a positive state- ment of Christian doctrines as the Lutherans understand them ; and the second, embracing* seven articles, condemns the prin- cipal characteristic errors of the Papacy. It is evangelical in the Augustinian sense, although not as precise in statement as the more perfect Calvinistic Confessions, and it, of course, con- tains the germs of the peculiar Lutheran views as to the neces- sity of the Sacraments, and the relation of tlie saca-amental signs to the grace they signify. Yet these peculiarities are so far from being explicitly stated, that Calvin found it consistent with his views of divine truth to subscribe this great Confes- sion during his residence in Strasburg. In 1540, ten years after it had been adopted as the public symbol of Protestant Germany, Melanchthon produced an edi- tion in Latin wdiicli he altered in several particulars, and which was hence distinguished as the Variata, the original and only authentic form of the Confession being distinguished as the Invariata. The principal changes introduced in this edition incline towards Synergistic or Arminian views of divine grace on the one hand, and on the other to simple views as to the sacraments more nearly corresponding with those prevailing among the Reformed Churches. — See Shedd's \" Hist, of Christ. Doctrine,\" Book vii., chap. 2. See also the accurate and learn- edly illustrated edition of the Augsburg Confession by Rev. Charles Krauth, D.D. 2d. The Apohgi/ (Defence) of the Augsburg Confession, pre- pared by Melanchthon, a. d. 1530, and subscribed by the Pro- testant theologians, a. d. 1537, at Smalcald. 3d. The Larger and Smaller Cateddsms prepared by Luther, A. D. 1529, \"the first for the use of preachers and teachers, the last as a guide for youth.\" 4th. The Articles of Smalcald, drawn up by Luther, a. d. 1536, and inscribed by the evangelical theologians in February, A. D. 1537, at the place whose name they bear. 5th. The Formula Concordice (Form of Concord), prepared in A. D. 1577 by Jacob Andreas and Martin Chenniitz and others for the purpose of settling certain controversies which had sprung up in the Lutheran Church, especially («) concern- ing the relative action of divine grace and the human will in regeneration, (h) cojicerning the nature of the Lord's presence in the Eucharist. This Confession contains a more scientific and tiioroughly dev^eloped statement of the Lutheran doctrine than can be found in any other of their public symbols. Its authority is, however, acknowledged only by the high Lu- theran party, that is, by that party in the church which con- sistently carries the peculiarities of Lutheran theology out to 124 CREEDS AND CONFESSIONS. the most complete logical development. All these Lutheran S^'mbols niaj be found in Latin accurately edited in \" Libri Sjmbolici,\" by Dr. C. A. Hase, Leipsic, 1836, and in Schaflf's \"Creeds of Christendom.\" 8. What are the principal Confessions of the Reformed or Cal- vinistic Churches ? The Confessions of the Keformed Churches are very consid- erable in number, and vary somewhat in character, although they substantially agree in the system of doctrines they teach. 1st. \"The oldest Confession of that branch of Protestantism which was not satisfied with the Lutheran tendency and sym- bol is the Confessio Tetrapolitana, — so-called, because the theo- logians of four cities of upper Germany, Strasburg, Constance, Memmingen, and Lindau, drew it up, and presented it to the emperor at the same diet of Augsburg, in 1530, at wdiich the first Lutheran symbol was presented. The principal theolo- gian concerned in its construction was Martin Bucer, of Stras- burg. It consists of twenty-two articles, and agrees generally with the Augsburg Confession. The points of difference per- tain to the doctrine of the sacraments. Upon this subject it is Zwinglian. These four cities, however, in 1532 adopted the Augsburg Confession, so that the Confessio Tetrapolitana ceased to be the formally adopted symbol of any branch of the church.\" — Shedd's \"Hist, of Christ. Doctrine,\" Book vii., chap. 2. 2d. The Reformed Confessions of the highest authority among the chm-ches are the following: (1.) The Second Helvetic Confession, prepared by Bullinger, A. D. 1564, and published 1566, superseded the First Helvetic Confession of a. d. 1536. It was adopted by all the Eeformed Churches in Switzerland \\vith the exception of Basle (which was content with the old Confession) and by the Reformed Churches in Poland, Hungary, Scotland and France, and it has always been esteemed as of the highest authority by all the Reformed Churches. (2.) The Heidelberg Catechism, prepared by Ursinus and Ole- vianvis a. d. 1562. It was established by civil authority as the doctrinal standard as well as the instrument of religious in- striu'tion for tlie churches of the. Palatinate, a German state at that time including both banks of tlie Rhine. It was indorsed by the Synod of Dort, and is a doctrinal standard of the Re- formed Churches of Germany and Holland, and of the [German and Dutch] Reformed Churches in America. It was used for the instruction of children in Scotland, before the adoption of the Catechisms of the AVestminster Assembly, and its use was sanctioned by an unanimous vote of the first General Assembly REFORMED CONFESSIONS. 125 of the reunited Presbyterian Church in the United States a. d. 1870.— See Minutes. (3.) The Thirty -nine Articles of the Church of England. In 1552, Cranmer, with the advice of other bishops, drew up the Forty-tivo Articles of Religion, and which were pubhshed by royal authority in 1553. These Avere revised and reduced to the number of thirty-nine by Archbishop Parker and otlier bishops, and ratified by both houses of Convocation, and pub- lished by royal authority in 1563. They constitute the doc- trinal standard of the Protestant Episcopal Churches of Eng- land, Ireland, Scotland, the Colonies, and the United States of America. The question whether these Articles are Calvinistic or not has been very unwarrantably made a matter of debate. See Lawrence's \"BamptonvLecture\" for 1804 on the Arminian side, and Toplady's \" Doctrinal Calvinism of the Cliurch of England,\" Dr. Goode's \"Doctrine of Church of England as to Effects of Infant Baptism,\" and Dr. William Cunningham's \" Keformers and their Theology,\" on the Calvinistic side. The seventeenth Article on Predestination is perfectly decisive of the question, and is as follows : \"Predestination to life is the everlasting pnrpose of God, whereby (before the foundations of the world were laid) he hath constantly decreed by his cou^nsel, secret to ris, to deliver from curse and damnation those whom he hath chosen in Christ out of mankind, and to bring them by Christ to everlasting salvation, as vessels made to honor. Wherefore they which he endued with so excellent a benefit of God, he called according to God's purpose by his Sj^irit working in due season : they, through grace, obey the calling; they he justified freely; they he made sons of God by adoption; they he made like the image of his only be- gotten Son, Jesus Christ; they walk religiously in good works, and at length, by God's mercy, they attain to everlasting feHcity. \"As the godly consideration of predestiBation and our election in Christ is full of sweet, pleasant, and unsj^eakable comfort to godly per- sons, and such as feel in themselves the working of the Spirit of Christ, mortifying the works of the flesh and their earthly members, and draw- ing up their mind to high and heavenly things, as well because it doth greatly establish and confirm their faitli of eternal salvation to be enjoyed through Christ, as because it doth fervently kindle their- love toward God. So, for curious and carnal persons, lacking the S^jirit of Christ, to have continually before their eyes the sentence of God's predestination, is a most dangerous downfall, whereby the devil doth thrust them either into desperation, or into wretchedness of most unclean living, no less perilous than desjjeration. \"Furthermore, we must receive God's promises in such wise as they be generally set forth to us in Holy Scripture; and, in our doings, that will of God is to be followed which we have expressly declared unto us in the word of God. \" These Articles purged of their Calvinism and reduced in number to twenty-five, including a new political Article (the 126 CREEDS AND CONFESSIONS. twenty-third) adopting as an article of faitli the political system of the United States Gfwernment, constitute the doctrinal Stand- ard of the Methodist Episcopal Church in America. (4.) The Canons of the Synod of Dort. This famous Synod was convened in Dort, Flolland, by the authority of the States General, for the purpose of settling the questions brought into controversy by the disciples of Arminius. Its sessions contin- ued from Nov. 13, a. d. 1()18, to May 9, a. d. 1619. It consisted of pastors, elders, and theological professors from the churciies of Holland, and deputies from the churches of England, Scot- land, Hesse, Bremen, the Palatinate, and Switzerland. The Canons of this Synod were received by all the Eeformed Churches as a true, accurate, and eminently authoritative ex- hibition of the Calvinistic S3\\stem of theology. Tliey consti- tute in connection with the Heidelberg Catechism the doc- trinal Confession of the Reformed Church of Holland and of its daughter the [Dutch] Reformed Church in America. (5.) The Confession and Catechisms of the Westminster Assem- hly. This Assembly of Divines was convened by an act of the Long Parliament passed June 12, 1643. The original call em- braced ten lords and twenty commoners as lay members, and one hundred and twenty-one divines — twenty ministers being afterward added — all shades of opinion as to Church Govern- ment being represented. The body continued its sessions from 1st of July, 1643, to 22d of February, 1649. The Confession and Catechisms they produced were immediately adopted by the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland. The Con- gregational Convention, also, called by Cromwell to meet at Savoy, in London, a. d. 1658, declared their approval of the doctrinal part of the Confession and Catechisms of the West- minster Assembly, and conformed their own deliverance, the Savoy Declaration, very nearly to it. Indeed \" the difference between these two Confessions is so very small, that the mod- ern Independents have in a manner laid aside the use of it (Savoy Declaration) in their families, and agreed with the Presbyterians in the use of the Assembly's Catechisms.\" — Neal, \"Puritans,\" II., 178. This Confession together with the Larger and Smaller Catechisms is the doctrinal standard of all the Presbyterian b(xlies in tiie world of English and Scotch deri- vation. It is also of all Creeds the one most highly approved by all bodies of Congregationalists in England and America. All of the Assemblies convened in New England for the purpose of settling the doctrinal basis of their churches have either indorsed or explicitly adopted this Confession and these' Catechisms as accm-ate expositions of their own faith. This was done by the Synod which met at Cambridge, Massachu- REFORMED CONFESSIONS. 127 setts, June, 1647, and again August, 1648, and prepared the Camhridge Platform. And it was done again by the Synod which sat in Boston, September, 1679, and May, 1680, and' pro- duced the Boston Confession. And again by the Synod which met at Saybrook, Connecticut, 1708, and produced tlie Say- brook Platform. 3d. There remain several other Reformed Confessions, which, although they are not the doctrinal standards of large denomi- nations of Christians, are nevertheless of high classical interest and authority because of their authors, and the circumstances under which they originated. (1.) The ^^Co7isensus Tigurinus\" or the ^^ Consensus of Zurich,'' or \"The mutual consent with respect to the doctrine of the sacrament of the ministers of the Church of Zurich and John Calvin, minister of the Church of Geneva.\" It consisted of twenty-six Articles, and deals exclusively with the questions relating to the Lord's Supper, and it was drawn by Calvin, A. D. 1549, for the purpose of bringing about a mutual consent among all parties in the Eeformed Church on the subject of which it treats. It was subscribed by the Churches of Zurich, Geneva, St. (iall, Schaffhausen, the Grisons, Neuchatel, and Basle, and was received with favor by all parts of the Re- formed Church, and remains an eminent monument of the true mind of the Reformed Church upon this so much debated question; and especially it is of value as setting forth with eminent clearness and unquestionable authority the real opin- ions of Calvin on the subject, deliberately stated after he had ceased from the vain attempt to secure the unity of Protestant- ism by a compromise with the Lutheran views as to the Lord's presence in the Eucharist. An accurate translation of this im- portant document will be found in the iVppendix. (2.) The ^'Consensus Genevensis'' was drawn up by Calvin, A. D. 1552, in the name of the Pastors of Geneva, and is a com- plete statement of Calvin's views on the subject of Predestina- tion. It was designed to unite all the Swiss Churches in their views of this great doctrine. It remains a pre-eminent monu- ment of the fundamental principles of true Calvinism. (3.) The ''Formula Consensus Helvetica,'' composed at Zurich, A. D. 1675, by John Henry Heidegger of Zurich, assisted by Francis Turretin of Geneva and Luke Gender of Basle. Its title is \"Form of agreement of the Helvetic Reformed Churches respecting the doctrine of universal grace, the doctrines con- nected therewith, and some other points.\" It was designed to unite the Swiss Churches in condemning and excluding that modified form of Calvinism, which in that century emanated from the Theological School of Saumur, represented by Amyral- 128 CREEDS AND CONFESSIONS. dns, Placfeus, etc. This is tlie most scientific and thorongli of all the Retbnned Confessions. Its eminent authorship* and the fact that it distinctively represents the most thoroughly con- sistent school of old Calvinists gives it high classical interest. It was subscribed by nearly all the Swiss Churches, but ceased to have public authority as a Confession since A. d. 1722.t All the Confessions of the Reformed Churches may be found col- lected in one convenient volume in the \"Collectio Confessionum in Eoclesiis Reformatis publicatarum,\" by Dr. H. A. Niemeyer, Leipsic, 1840, and in Dr. Schaif 's \" Creeds of Christendom.\" * See Herzog's Keal- Encyclopedia. Bomberger's translation. Article, \"Helvetic Confessions.\" t An accurate translation will be found in the Appendix.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "29", "sort_key": 29, "group": "Chapter VIII", "question": "In taJiat different loays do the Scriptures reveal God ?", "answer": "They reveal God — 1st. By his names. 2d. By the works which they ascribe to him. 3d. By the attributes which they predicate of him. 4th. By the worship they direct to be paid to him. 5th. By the manifestation of God in Christ. 8. State the etymology and meaning of the several names ap- propriated to God in the Scriptures. 1st. Jehovah, from the Hebrew verb ^Ti' to he. It expresses self-existence and unchangeableness; it is the incommunicable name of God, which the Jews superstitiously refused to pro- nounce, always substituting in their reading the word Adonai, Lord. Hence it is represented in our English version by the word Lord, printed in capital letters. Jah, probably an abbreviation of the name Jehovah, is used principally in the Psalms. — Ps. Ixviii. 4. It constitutes the cpintinna1. This class includes all those feelings which attend, in any manner, the exercise of the other faculties. 3d._Xll£jisalL- It will be observed that the functions of the conscience in- volve faculties belonging to both the first and second classes (see below, Question 5). It is often asked. Which of our faculties is the seat of our moral nature? Now while there is a sense in which all moral questions concern the relation of the states or acts of the will to tlie law of God revealed in the conscience, and therefore in which the will and the conscience are pre-eminently the fouu- 282 MORAL CONSTITUTION OF THE SOUL. dation of man's moral nature, it is true, nevertheless, that every one of the faculties of the human soul, as above classified, is exercised in relation to all moral distinctions, e. (/., the intellect- ual in the perception and judg-ment; the emotional in pleasant feeling- or tlie reverse; the will, in choosing or refusing, and in acting. Every state or act of any one of the faculties of the human soul, therefore, which involves the judging, choosing, refusing, or desiring, upon a purel}^ moral question, or the feel- ing corresponding thereto, is a moral state or act, and all the faculties, viewed in their relations to the distinction between good and evil, are moral faculties.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "88", "sort_key": 88, "group": "Chapter XIV", "question": "What is the Will?", "answer": "The term \"will\" is often used to express the mere faculty of volition, whereby the soul chooses, or refuses, or determines to act, and the exercise of that faculty. It is also used in a Avider sense, and in this sense I use it here, to include the faculty of V volition, together with all of the spontaneous states of the soul \\ (designated by Sir William Hamilton, \" Lectures on Metaphy- ^ sics,\" Lect. XL, the faculties of conation, the excitive, striving faculties, possessing, as their common characteristic, \" a ten- dency toward the realization of their end \"), the dispositions, affections, desires, which determine a man in the exercise of his free power of volition. It must be remembered, however, that these two senses of the word \"will\" are essentially distinct. The will, as including all the faculties of conation (the disposi- tions and desires), is to be essentially distinguished from the single faculty of soul exercised in the resulting volition, i. e., the choosing or the acting according to its prevailing desire. The term \" will \" is used in the wider sense in this chapter. A man in willing is perfectly free, i. e., he always exercises volition according to the prevailing disposition or desire of his will at the time. This is the highest freedom, and the only one consistent with rationality or moral responsibility. 5. Dejine the term Volition. By the term \" faculty of volition \" Ave mean the executive faculty of the soul, the faculty of choice or self-decision ; and by the term \" volition \" we mean the exercise of that faculty in any act of choice or self-decision.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "89", "sort_key": 89, "group": "Chapter XIV", "question": "W licit is Conscience?", "answer": "Conscience, as a faculty, includes (a) a moral sense or intu- ition, a power of discerning right and wrong, which, combining Avith the understanding, or faculty of comparing and judging, judges (jf the right or wrong of our own moral dispositions and TRUE TEST AND SEAT OF MORAL CHARACTER. 283 voluntary actions, and of the dispositions and volnntaiy actions of other free agents. (6.) This faculty judges according to a divine law of right and wrong, included within itself (it is a law to itself, the original law written upon the heart, Horn, ii. 14), and (c) it is accompanied Avith vivid emotions, pleasur- able in view of that which is right, and painful in view of that which is wrong, especially when our conscience is engaged in reviewing the states or the actions of our own souls. This faculty in its own province is sovereign, and can have no other superior than the revealed word of God. — See M'Cosh, \"Divine Government,\" Book III., chap. i. sec. 4. 7. What is the true test for determining the moral quality of any mental act or state ? The only true tests of the moral quahty of any state or act are — 1st. The inspired word of God, and 2d. The spontaneous, practical, and universal judgments of men. The moral judgments of men, like all our intuitive judg- ments, are certainly reliable only when they respect concrete and individual judgments. The generalized and abstract prop- ositions which being supposed to be formed by abstraction and generalization from these individual judgments may be true or not, but they can not be received as a reliable foundation upon which to erect a system of evidence. Very absurd attempts have been often made to demonstrate the moral or non-moral character of any principle, by means of general formularies rep- resenting partial truths imperfectly stated, and by means of other, — either false, senseless, or irrelevant, — a priori consid- erations. 8. Itito what classes are the spontaneous affections of the soul to he distributed, and ivhat are the distinguishing characteristics of each class ? The spontaneous desires and affections of the soul are of two distnict classes. 1st. The animal, or those which arise bHndly without intelligence, e. g., the appetites and instinctive afff ctions, these have no intrinsic moral quality in themselves, and become the occasion of moral action only when they are restrained or inordinately indulged. 2d. The rational affec- tions and desires called out by objects apprehended by the intellect. 9. What rational spontaneous affections possess a moral quality, and in what does thai quality inherently attach ? Such rational spontaneous affections are intrinsically and essentially either good or bad or morally indifferent, and their 284 MORAL CONSTITUTION OF THE SOUL. quality is discriminated by the quality of the objects by which they are attracted. They are good when their objects are good, evil when tlieir objects are evil, and morally indifferent when their objects are indifferent. Theii\" moral quality, whatever it be, is intrinsic to them. When they are good, all men con- sider them worthy of approbation, and when they are evil, all men consider them worthy of condemnation and righteous in- dignation, because of their essential nature as good or as evil, and without any consideration of their origin. When good these spontaneous affections determine the volitions to good, when they are evil they determine the volitions to evil. 10. To ivliat do ice apply fJie desk/nation ^'■permanent principles, or dispositions \" of soul ? and when do they possess a moral charac- ter, and what is the source of that character ? There are in the soul, underlying its passing states and af- fections, certain permanent habits or dispositions involving a tendency to or facility for certain kinds of exercises. Some of these habits or dispositions are innate and some are acquired. These constitute the character of the man, and lay the founda- tion for all his successive exercises of feeling, affection, desire, volition, or action. As far as these are morally good, the man and his action are good; as far as these are evil, the man and his action are evil; as far as tliese are morally indifferent, i. e., concern objects morally indifferent, the actions which spring from them are morally indifferent. The moral character of these inherent moral tendencies of the soul is intrinsic and es- sential. They are the ultimate tendencies of the soul itself, and their goodness or badness is an ultimate fact of consciousness. 11. Shoiv that the state and actlo7i of the intellect may possess a moral character. The intellect is so implicated in its exercises with the moral affections and emotions, that its views and judgments on all moral subjects have a moral character also. A man is hence responsible for his moral judgments — and hence for his beliefs as well as for his moral feelings, because the one is as imme- diately as the other determined by the general moral state or character of the soul. A man who is blind to moral excellence, or to the deformity of sin, is condemned bj^ every enhghtened conscience. The Scriptures pronounce a woe upon those \"who call evil good and good evil, Avho put light for darkness and darkness for liglit.\" — Isa. v. 20. Sin is called in Scripture \"blind- ness\" and \"folly.\" — 1 John ii. 11; Eph. iv. 18; Rev. iii. 17; Matt, xxiii. 17; Luke xxiv. '2b. CONSCIENCE INDESTRUCTIBLE. 285", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "101", "sort_key": 101, "group": "Chapter XVIII", "question": "What must a triie definition of the nature of sin embrace ?", "answer": "A definition of sin must — 1st. Include all that either the Word of God or an enlightened conscience decides to be sin. 2d. It must include nothing else. Otherwise in either case it is false. 3. State the definitions of sin given by Turretin, and by our Standards, and by Vitringa. Turretin, Locus 9, QufBS. 1. — \" Inclinatio, actio, vel omissio pugnans cum lege Dei, vel carens rectitudine legali debita in esse.\" 316 THE NATURE OF SIN AND THE SIN OF ADAM. \" Conf. Faith,\" Ch. vi, § 6; \" L. Cat,\" Q. 24; \" S. Cat,\" Q. 14 \" Sin is any want of conformity unto, or transgression of the law of God.\" Campejus Vitringa, Prof Theo. in Franeker, died 1722. — \" Forma peccati est disconvenientia, actus, habitus, ant status hominis cum divina lege.\" This last excellent definition embraces two constitutent prop- ositions.— Ist. Sin_i^_any and ey.ery want of conformity with the moral law of God, whether of excess or defect, whether of omission or commission. 2d. Sin is any want of conformity of the moral states and habits as well of the actions of the human soul with the law of God ?", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "102", "sort_key": 102, "group": "Chapter XVIII", "question": "What is Laio ? And what is tJie Law of God ?", "answer": "The word law is used in a great many and in very different senses. It is used by natural philosophers often to express — 1st. A general fact, e. (/., the general fact that all matter at- tracts all matter inversely as the square of the distance. 2d. An established order of sequence in which certain events occur, as the order of the seasons, and any established order of nature. 3d. The mode of acting of a specific force, as the law of electri- cal induction, etc. 4th. A spontaneous order of development, as the internal self-acting law of the growth of animals and plants from the seed. The moral law of God, however, is not an internal, self-reg- ulating principle of man's moral nature, like the feigned inner light of the Quakers, but an imperial standard of moral excel- lence imposed upon mankind from without and from above them by the supreme authority of a personal moral Governor over personal moral subjects. It involves (a) a certain degree of enlightenment as to truth and duty, (/>) a rule of action reg- ulating the will and binding the conscience, (c) armed with sanctions, or imperative motives constraining to obedience. 5. Prove that sin is any icant ofconformity to '■'' Laio.'' 1st. Whenever we sin conscience condemns us for not com- ing up to a standard which we intuitivel}^ recognize as morally obligatory upon us. Conscience implies {a) moral accounta- bility, and hence subjection to a moral Governoi', and {Ij) a standard to which we ought to be conformed. The conscience itself, as the organ of God's law, contains the law written on the heart 2d. It is implied in all the language used by the Holy Ghost in Scripture to express the idea of sin \\2t' D''pt:' from nob' to devi- SIN WANT OF CONFORMITY TO LAW OF GOD. 317 ate from the ivay. ^'^^ to miss the mark, djuaprdvoo to err, to miss the mark, jrapa/iadz? (Gal. iii. 19), a going aside from, a trans- gresssion. 3d. It is explicitly asserted in Scripture, \" Every one tliat doetli sin, also doeth rtjr dvojuiav, and sin is dvojuia.\" — 1 John iii. 4. \" For where no law is there is no transgression.\" — Rom. iv. 15. 6. Prove that sin is any ivant of conformity to the moral Law of God. As above shown this is implied in the action of conscience. It testifies to a law imposed upon us by an authority external to us, the supreme authority of God. In the absence of all supernatural revelation it has led all heathen nations to the recognition of the authority of God, or of gods exercising gov- ernment, to a belief in rewards and punishments administered by God, and hence to expiatory and propitiatory rites. It is also asserted by David that sin of any kind is disobe- dience and dishonor done to God. — See fifty-first Psalm. Hence sin is not a mere violation of the law of our own constitution, nor of the system of things, but an offence against a personal Lawgiver and moral Governor, who vindicates his law with penalties. The soul that sins is always conscious that his sin is (a) intrinsically vile and polluting, and {h) that it justly deserves punishment and calls down the righteous wrath of God. Hence sin carries with it two inalienable characters — (a) ill desert, guilt, reatus, (6) pollution, macula. 7. Shoio that this Laio, any tvant of conformity to which is sin, demands absolute moral perfection.* This is necessarily involved in the very essence of moral obligation. The very essence of right is thcd it ought to he. Tlie very essence of wrong is that it ought not to be. If any thing- be indifferent it is not moral, and if it be moral it is a matter of obligation. This being of the essence of right it is, of course, true of each consistent part as Avell as of the whole. Any degree short of full conformity with the highest right is there- fore of the natm-e of sin. \"For whosoever shall keep the Avhole law and yet offend in one point is guilty of all.\" — -James ii. 10. The old maxim is true, Omne minus bonum habet rationem mali. It evidently follows from this principle that the Romish doc- trine of works of Supererogation is absurd as well as wicked, Bince if these works are obligatory they are not supererogatory, and if tliey are not obligatory they are not moral, and if not moral they can have no moral value. Hence also all those Perfectionists who admit that men are not now able to keep * Dr. C. Hodge's Unpublished Lectures. 318 THE NATURE OF SIN AND THE SIN OF ADAM. perfectly the law of absolute moral perfection, while they main- tain that Christians may in this life live without sin, obviously use incorrect and misleading langaiage. 8. Prove that any want of conformity ivith this Laiv in the states and permanent habit of soul, as well as in its acts, is sin. Ist. This is proved by the common judgments of all men. All jvidge that the moral state of the heart determines the moral character of the actions, and that the moral character of the actions discloses the moral state of the heart, and that a man whose acts are habitually profane, or malignant, or impure, is himself in the permanent state of his heart profane, or malig- nant, or impure. 2d. The same is proved by the common religious experience of all Christians. This experience alwa^'s involves conviction of sin, and conviction of sin involves as its most imiform and prominent element not merely a conviction that our actions fail to come up to the proper standard of excellence, but a sense that in the depths of our nature, below and beyond the reach of volition, we are spiritually dead and polluted, and im- potent and insensible to divine things, and worthy of condem- nation therefore. Every Christian has been brouglit with Paul to cry out, \"0 wretched man that I am: who shall deliver me from the body of this death.\" — Rom. vii. 24 This finds expres- sion, and this principle for which we are contending finds proof in all the prayers, supplications, confessions, and in all the hjanns and devotional literature of Christians of all ages and denominations. 3d. The Scriptures explicitly call the permanent states of the soul \"sin\" Avhen they are not conformed to the law of God. Sin and its lusts are said to reign in the mortal body; the mem- bers are the instruments of sin; the unregenerate are the ser- vants of sin. — Rom. vi. 12-17. The disposition or permanent \"tendency\" to sin is called \"flesh\" as opposed to \"spirit,\" Gal. V. 17; also \"lust,\" James i. 14, 15; \"old Adam,\" and \"body of sin,\" \"ignorance,\" \"blindness of heart,\" \"alienation from the life of God,\" and \" a condition of being past feeling,\" Eph. iv. 18, 19. 9. Shoio that the very first spontaneous motions of concfiipiscence are sin ? 1st. The heart of the Christian often for the moment spon- taneously lusts for evil when the conscience promptly condemns and the will forbids and restrains and diverts the attention. Althcjugh the man does not consent to the sin that is present in him, nevertheless the Christian feels that such movements of ORIGIN OF SIN. 319 concupiscence are unholy, and worthy of condemnation, and he not only resists them but condemns and loathes himself because of them, and seeks to be purged Irom them at once by the atoning blood, and the sanctifying spirit of Jesus. 2d. Concupiscence is called \" sin \" in Scripture. \" I had not known sin, but by the law, ibr I had not known kTuhvi-Uav (con- cupiscence) except the law had said thou shalt not kTtiOvi-a'jGEii.^^ Also rd TtaOrj/uaza rcSv djuapriaov, \"the motions of sin,\" and \"the law in the members,\" and \"sin that dwelleth in me,\" that worketh without \" my consent,\" which \" works all manner of concupiscence,\" etc. — Kom. vii. 5-24. 10. What is the first great mystery connected with the origin of sin ? How or why was the existence of sin tolerated in the crea- tion of a God at once eternal, self-existent, and infinite in Avis- dom, power, holiness, and benevolence? All the attempted solutions of this enigma which have been entertained in our day have been summed up by Prof Haven of Chicago as follows : \" Either God can not prevent sin, i. e., either (a) in any system, (b) in a moral system involving free agency. \" Or for some reason God does not choose to prevent sin, i. e., either because («) its existence is of itself desirable, (b) or though not in itself desirable it is the necessary means of the greatest good, or (c) though not in itself tending to good it may be overruled to that result, or (d) because, in general terms, its permission will involve less evil than its absolute prevention. It is obvious (o.) that God has permitted sin, and (b) hence it was right for him to do so. But why it was right must ever remain a mystery demanding submission and delying solution.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "103", "sort_key": 103, "group": "Chapter XVIII", "question": "What ivas the ^lanicJiwan doctrine as to the origin of sin?", "answer": "They held the opinion that sin had its ground in some eter- nal, self-existent principle independent of God, either matter or self-existent devil. This doctrine is inconsistent (a) with the independence, infinitude, and sovereignty of God; {b) with the nature of sin as essentially the revolt of a created free-will from God. Sin is an element of perverted moral agency. To con- sider it an attribute of matter is to- deny it. AH the Christian fathers united in opposing JManichasism and in maintaining that sin is the product of the free-will of man alone. 12. State the doctrine of St. Augustine ivith respect to the priva- tive nature of sin. St. Augustine held — 1st. That God is the creator of all 320 THE NATURE OF SIN AND THE SIN OF ADAM. entities • and the absolutely sovereign Governor of all moral agents and of all their actions; and 2d. That nevertheless God is in no sense either tlie author or the cause of sin. In order to reconcile tliese he held, 3d. That sin is not an entity, but is in its essence simply a defect. His dictum, which hence has passed into general currency with all classes of theologians, was Nihil est malum nisi privafio honi. They have properly distinguished between \"negation\" and \"privation.\" Negation is the absence of that wliich does not belong to the nature of the subject, as sight to a stone. Privation is the absence of that Avhich belonging to the nature of the subject is necessary to its perfec- tion, as sight to a man. Sin therefore is privative because it originates in the absence of those moral qualities which ougld to be present in the states and actions of a free, responsible, moral agent. It is to be remembered, however, that the inherent depravity •which \" comes from a defective or privative cause \" instantly assumes a positive form, from the essentiall}^ active nature of the human soul. In a passive condition of being, a defect might remain purel}' negative. But in a ceaselessly active being, and one acting under ceaseless moral obligations, a moral defect must instantly become a positive vice. Not to love God is to hate him. Not to be in all things conformed to his will is to rebel against him, and to break his law at all points. — See Edwards, \" Original Sin,\" pt. 4. sec. 2.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} -{"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "104", "sort_key": 104, "group": "Chapter XVIII", "question": "What is the Pelagian doctrine as to the nature of sin?", "answer": "The Pelagian view of sin, which has been rejected by all branches of the Christian Cliurch, is — 1st. That law can com- mand only volitions. 2d. That states of the soul can be com- manded only in so far as they are the direct effect of previous volitions. 3d. Hence that sin consists simply in acts of volition. 4th. That whatever a man has not plenary ability to do he is under no obligation to do. 5th. That there is no such thing, therefore, as innate depravity. 6th. That since a volition to be moral or the subject of approbation or of condemnation, must be a pure self-decision of the will, it follows that sin is beyond the absolute control of God. 14. In ivhat sense is the dictum that ^^all sin is voluntary\" true, and in ivhat sense false? _ It all turns upon the sense of the phrase \"Voluntary.\" If it be in the Pelagian sense restricted to \" acts of volition ; \" then the dictum that \"all sin is voluntary\" is false. If, however, it is used so as to include the spontaneous dispositions, tenden- cies, and afiections which constitute the permanent character SIN OF ADAM. 321 of the soul, and Avhich prompt to and decide the nature of the voHtions, then all sin is voluntary, because all sin has its ground and spring in these spontaneous tendencies and dispositions, i. e., in the permanent moral states of the soul. 15. State the peculiarities of the Romish position upon this sub- ject, and also that of the Arminian Perfectionists. The Roman Church agrees with all Protestants in holding that all the habits and permanent dispositions as well as the actions of the soul which are not conformed to the law of God are sinful. But it is a prominent characteristic of their doc- trine that they hold that moral condition of soul which remains in the regenerate as the consequence of original sin, and the fomes or fuel of actual sin, is not properly of the nature of sin. They maintain tliat the first spontaneous movement of this concupiscence is not. sin in itself, and not to be treated as such — but that it becomes the cause of sin as soon as its solicita- tions are entertained and translated into action by the will. — \"Cat. of Council of Trent,\" Pt. II., ch. ii., Q. 42. The Arminians avail themselves of the same positions when defending their doctrine of Christian Perfection. Wesley (in \"Meth. Doc. Tracts,\" pp. 294-312) distinguishes between \"sin properly so called, i. e., voluntary transgression of known law, and sin improperly so called, i. e., involuntary transgression of law, known or unknown,\" and declares, \" I believe there is no such perfection in this life as excludes these involuntary trans- gressions, which I apprehend to be naturally consequent upon the ignorance and mistakes inseparable from mortality.\" The Sin of Adam. 16. What is the second g7xat mystery connected with tJie origin of sin ? How could sin originate in the will of a creature created with a positively holy disposition ? The difficulty is to reconcile understandingly the fact that sin did so originate — 1st. With the known constitution of the human will. If the volitions are as tlie prevalent affections and desires, and if the affections and desires excited by outward occasions are good or evil, according to the permanent moral state of the will, how could a sinful volition originate in a holy will ? or how could the permanent state of his soul become spontane- ously unholy? 2d. With universal experience. As it is impossible that a sinful desire or volition should originate in the holy will of 21 322 THE NATURE OF SIN AND THE SIN OF ADAM. God, or in the holj^ M-ill of saints and angels, or that a truly holy affection or volition should originate in the depraved wills of fallen men Avithout supernatural regeneration (Luke vi. 43-45), how could a sinful volition originate in the holy will of Adam ? That Adam was created with a holy yet fallible will, and that he did fall, are facts established by divine testimony. We must believe them, although we can not rationally explain them. This is for us impossible — 1st. Because there remains an inscrutable element in the human will, adopt whichever theory of it we may. 2d. Because all our reasoning must be based upon con- sciousness, and no other man ever had in his consciousness the experience of Adam. The origin of our sinful volitions is plain enough. But we lack some of the data necessary to ex- plain his case. In the way of approximation, however, we may observe— 1st. It is unsound to reason from the independent will of the infinite God to the dependent will of the creature. 2d. The infallibility of saints and angels is not inherent, but is a superinduced conjirmmg grace of God. They are not in a state of probation. Adam was — his will was free, but not confirmed. 3d. The depraved will of man can not originate holy affec- tions and volitions, because the presence of a positively holy principle is necessaiy to constitute them holy. But, on the other hand, there were already in the holy will of Adam many principles morally indifferent, in themselves neither good nor bad, and becoming sinful only wdien, in default of the control of reason and conscience, they prompt to their indulgence in ways forbidden by God; e. q., admiration and appetite for the fruit, and desire for knowledge. The sin coiumenced the moment that, under the powerful persuasion of Satan, these two motives were dwelt upon in spite of the prohibition, and thus allowed to become so prevalent in tlie soul as temporarily to neutralize reverence for God's authority, and fear of his threatening. 4th. Adam, although endowed with a holy disposition, was inexperienced in the assaults of temptation. 5th. He was assailed through the morally indifferent princi- ples of his nature by a vastly superior intelligence and char- acter, to whom, in the highest sense, the origin of all sin must be referred. 17. What appears from the history of the Fall to have been the precise nature of the first sin of Adam? THE EFFECT OF ADAM'S SIN ON HIMSELF. 323 It appears from the record (Gen. iii. 1-6) that the initial influences inducing our first parents, in their first transgression, were in themselves considered morally indifferent. These were — 1st. Natural appetite for the attractive fruit. 2d. Natural de- sire for knowledge. 3d. The persuasive power of Satan upon Eve, including the known influence of a superior mind and will. 4th. The persuasive power of both Satan and Eve upon Adam. Their dreadful sin appears to have been essentially — 1st. Unbelief, they virtually made God a liar. 2d. Deliberate disobedience, they set up their will as a law in place of his.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "104", "sort_key": 104, "group": "Chapter XVIII", "question": "What is the Pelagian doctrine as to the nature of sin?", "answer": "The Pelagian view of sin, which has been rejected by all branches of the Christian Cliurch, is — 1st. That law can com- mand only volitions. 2d. That states of the soul can be com- manded only in so far as they are the direct effect of previous volitions. 3d. Hence that sin consists simply in acts of volition. 4th. That whatever a man has not plenary ability to do he is under no obligation to do. 5th. That there is no such thing, therefore, as innate depravity. 6th. That since a volition to be moral or the subject of approbation or of condemnation, must be a pure self-decision of the will, it follows that sin is beyond the absolute control of God. 14. In ivhat sense is the dictum that ^^all sin is voluntary\" true, and in ivhat sense false? It all turns upon the sense of the phrase \"Voluntary.\" If it be in the Pelagian sense restricted to \" acts of volition ; \" then the dictum that \"all sin is voluntary\" is false. If, however, it is used so as to include the spontaneous dispositions, tenden- cies, and afiections which constitute the permanent character SIN OF ADAM. 321 of the soul, and Avhich prompt to and decide the nature of the voHtions, then all sin is voluntary, because all sin has its ground and spring in these spontaneous tendencies and dispositions, i. e., in the permanent moral states of the soul. 15. State the peculiarities of the Romish position upon this sub- ject, and also that of the Arminian Perfectionists. The Roman Church agrees with all Protestants in holding that all the habits and permanent dispositions as well as the actions of the soul which are not conformed to the law of God are sinful. But it is a prominent characteristic of their doc- trine that they hold that moral condition of soul which remains in the regenerate as the consequence of original sin, and the fomes or fuel of actual sin, is not properly of the nature of sin. They maintain tliat the first spontaneous movement of this concupiscence is not. sin in itself, and not to be treated as such — but that it becomes the cause of sin as soon as its solicita- tions are entertained and translated into action by the will. — \"Cat. of Council of Trent,\" Pt. II., ch. ii., Q. 42. The Arminians avail themselves of the same positions when defending their doctrine of Christian Perfection. Wesley (in \"Meth. Doc. Tracts,\" pp. 294-312) distinguishes between \"sin properly so called, i. e., voluntary transgression of known law, and sin improperly so called, i. e., involuntary transgression of law, known or unknown,\" and declares, \" I believe there is no such perfection in this life as excludes these involuntary trans- gressions, which I apprehend to be naturally consequent upon the ignorance and mistakes inseparable from mortality.\" The Sin of Adam. 16. What is the second g7xat mystery connected with tJie origin of sin ? How could sin originate in the will of a creature created with a positively holy disposition ? The difficulty is to reconcile understandingly the fact that sin did so originate — 1st. With the known constitution of the human will. If the volitions are as tlie prevalent affections and desires, and if the affections and desires excited by outward occasions are good or evil, according to the permanent moral state of the will, how could a sinful volition originate in a holy will ? or how could the permanent state of his soul become spontane- ously unholy? 2d. With universal experience. As it is impossible that a sinful desire or volition should originate in the holy will of 21 322 THE NATURE OF SIN AND THE SIN OF ADAM. God, or in the holj^ M-ill of saints and angels, or that a truly holy affection or volition should originate in the depraved wills of fallen men Avithout supernatural regeneration (Luke vi. 43-45), how could a sinful volition originate in the holy will of Adam ? That Adam was created with a holy yet fallible will, and that he did fall, are facts established by divine testimony. We must believe them, although we can not rationally explain them. This is for us impossible — 1st. Because there remains an inscrutable element in the human will, adopt whichever theory of it we may. 2d. Because all our reasoning must be based upon con- sciousness, and no other man ever had in his consciousness the experience of Adam. The origin of our sinful volitions is plain enough. But we lack some of the data necessary to ex- plain his case. In the way of approximation, however, we may observe— 1st. It is unsound to reason from the independent will of the infinite God to the dependent will of the creature. 2d. The infallibility of saints and angels is not inherent, but is a superinduced conjirmmg grace of God. They are not in a state of probation. Adam was — his will was free, but not confirmed. 3d. The depraved will of man can not originate holy affec- tions and volitions, because the presence of a positively holy principle is necessaiy to constitute them holy. But, on the other hand, there were already in the holy will of Adam many principles morally indifferent, in themselves neither good nor bad, and becoming sinful only wdien, in default of the control of reason and conscience, they prompt to their indulgence in ways forbidden by God; e. q., admiration and appetite for the fruit, and desire for knowledge. The sin coiumenced the moment that, under the powerful persuasion of Satan, these two motives were dwelt upon in spite of the prohibition, and thus allowed to become so prevalent in tlie soul as temporarily to neutralize reverence for God's authority, and fear of his threatening. 4th. Adam, although endowed with a holy disposition, was inexperienced in the assaults of temptation. 5th. He was assailed through the morally indifferent princi- ples of his nature by a vastly superior intelligence and char- acter, to whom, in the highest sense, the origin of all sin must be referred. 17. What appears from the history of the Fall to have been the precise nature of the first sin of Adam? THE EFFECT OF ADAM'S SIN ON HIMSELF. 323 It appears from the record (Gen. iii. 1-6) that the initial influences inducing our first parents, in their first transgression, were in themselves considered morally indifferent. These were — 1st. Natural appetite for the attractive fruit. 2d. Natural de- sire for knowledge. 3d. The persuasive power of Satan upon Eve, including the known influence of a superior mind and will. 4th. The persuasive power of both Satan and Eve upon Adam. Their dreadful sin appears to have been essentially — 1st. Unbelief, they virtually made God a liar. 2d. Deliberate disobedience, they set up their will as a law in place of his.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "105", "sort_key": 105, "group": "Chapter XVIII", "question": "What relation did God sustain to Adams sin?", "answer": "Concerning the relation sustained by God to the sin of Adam all we know is — 1st. God created Adam holy, with all natural powers necessary for accountable agency. 2d. He rightfully withheld from him, during his probation, any higher supernat- ural influence necessary to render him infallible. 3d. He neither caused nor approved Adam's sin. 4th. He sovereignly decreed to permit him to sin, thus determining that he should sin as he did.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "106", "sort_key": 106, "group": "Chapter XVIII", "question": "What luas the effect of Adams sin upon himself?", "answer": "1st. In the natural relation which Adam sustained to God as the subject of his moral government, his sin must have in- stantly had the effect of (1) displeasing and alienating God, and (2) of depraving his own soul. 2d. In the covenant relation which Adam sustained to God the penalty of the covenant of Avorks was incurred, i. e., death, including, (1) mortality of body, (2) corruption of soul, (3) sen- tence of eternal death. 20. In lohat sense did lie become totally depraved, and hoiv coidd total depravity result from one sin ? By the afiirmation that total depravity was the immediate result of Adam's first sin, it is not meant that he became as bad as he could be, or even as corrupt as the best of his unre- generate descendants ; but it is meant — 1st. His apostasy from God was complete. God demands perfect obedience. Adam was now a rebel in arms. 2d. That the favor and communion of God, the sole condition of his spiritual life, was withdrawal. 3d. A schism was introduced into the soul itself The pain- ful reproaches of conscience were excited, and could never be allayed wdthout an atonement. This led to fear of God, distrust, prevarication, and, by necessary consequence, to in- numerable other sins. 32-4 THE NATURE OF SIN AND THE SIN OF ADAM. 4th. Thus the whole nature became depraved. The will being at war with the conscience, the understanding- became darkened; the conscience, in consequence of constant outrage and neglect, became seared; the appetites of the body inordi- nate, and its members instruments of unrighteousness. 5th. There remained in man's nature no recuperative princi- ple ; he must go on from worse to worse, unless God interpose. Thus the soul of man being essentially active, although one sin did not establish a confirmed habit, it did alienate God and work confusion in the soul, and thus lead to an endless course of sin. The Consequences of Adam's sin to his posterity are — 1st. The judicial charging of the legal responsibility of that sin upon all at their creation whom he represented in the Covenant of Works. 2d. The consequent birth of each of his descendants in a state of exclusion from the life-giving communion of the divine Spirit. 3d. The consequent loss of original righteous- ness, and the inherent and prevailing tendency to sin which is the invariable moral condition of each of his descendants from birth. 4th. The absolute moral inability of men to change their natures or to fulfil their obligations. For reasons which will appear subsequently, the subjects connected with man's natural moral corruption and impotency, are discussed before the subject of Imputation, or the reason and method of the passing over of the consequences of Adam's sin from him to his descendants.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "107", "sort_key": 107, "group": "Chapter XIX", "question": "Hoio is original sin to he defined ?", "answer": "See \"Confession of Faith,\" Chapter vi. ; \"L. Cat.,\" Questions 25, 26; \"S. Cat,\" Question 18. The phrase, original sin, is used sometimes to include the , judicial imputation of the guilt of Adam's sin, as well as the iv'^ hereditary moral corruption, common to all his descendants, ' !?S which is one of the consequences of that imputation. ]More / strictly, however, the phrase original sin designates only the/y hereditary moral corruption common to all men from birth. |' In the definition of this doctrine we deny — 1st. That this corruption is in any sense physical, that it inheres in the essence of the soul, or in any of its natural fac- ulties as such. 2d. That it consists primarily in the mere supremacy of the sensual part of our nature. It is a depraved habit or bias of will. 3d. That it consists solely in the absence of holy dispositions, because, from the inherent activity of the soul, sin exhibits itself from the beginning in the way of a positive proneness to evil. On the other hand, wb affirm — 1st. That original sin is purely moral, being the innate proneness of the ^yil^ |o eyjl. 2d. That having its seat in the will averse to the holy law of God, it biasses the understanding, and thus deceives the conscience, leads to erroneous moral judgments, to blindness of mind, to deficient and perverted sensibility in relation to moral objects, to the inordinate action of the sensuous nature, and thus to corruption of the entire soul. 3d. Thus it presents two aspects: (1.) The loss of the original righteous habit of will. (2.) The presence of a positively un- righteous habit. 326 ORIGINAL SLY. 4th. Yet from the fact that this innate depravity does embrace a positive disposition to evil, it does not follow that a positive evil quality has been infused into the sonl. Because, from the essentially active nature of the soul, and from the essential nature of virtue, as that which obliges the will, it evidently follows that moral indifference is impossible; and so that depravity, which President Edwards says \" comes from a defective or privative cause,\" instantly assumes a positive form. Not to love God is to rebel against him, not to obey virtue is to trample it under foot. Self-love soon brings us to fear, then to hate the vindicator of righteousness. — Edwards on \"Original Sin,\" Part IV., sec. 2.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "111", "sort_key": 111, "group": "Chapter XX", "question": "What is the Arminian explanation of this fact?", "answer": "1st. They admit that all men inherit from Adam a corrupt nature predisposing them to sin, but they deny that this innate condition is itself properly sin, or involves guilt or desert of punishment. 2d. They affirm that it was consistent with the justice of God to allow this great evil to come upon all men at birth, only in view of the fact that he had determined to introduce an adequate compensation in the redemption of Christ, impartially intended for all men, and the sufficient influences of his grace which all men experience, and which restores to all ability to do right, and therefore full personal responsibility. Hence, in- fants are not under condemnation. Condemnation attaches to no man until he has abused his gracious ability. In the gift of Christ, God redresses the wrong done us by allowing Adam to use his fallen nature as the medium for the propagation CHURCH DOCTRINE STATED. 353 of sinful children. — Dr. D. D. Whedon, \"Bibliotlieca Sacra,\" April, 1862, \"Conf Rem.,\" vii. 3, Liinborcli, \"Theol. Christ,\" iii., 3, 4, 5, G7. We object to this doctrine. — (1.) Tliat our condemnation in Adam is of jitstice, and our redemption in Christ of Grace. (2.) The remedy of the compensatory system is not applied to many heathen, etc. (3.) The view is inconsistent with Script- ural doctrines as to sin, inability, regeneration, etc., etc. 8. What has been the prevalent ansiver given hy New England Theologians since the days of Dr. Hojjhins ? Dr. Hopkins taught the doctrine of divine efficiency in the production of sin. This, of course, dissolves the question as to the justice of God in bi-inging Adam's descendants into the world as sinners, since he is the ultimate cause of all sin. Later New England divines discard the doctrine of divine efficiency, but they agree with Hopkins in denying imputation, and in referring the law which entails the corruption of Adam upon each of his descendants to a sovereign divine constitution. If this view, while acknowledging that this divine consti- tution is infinitely just and righteous, simply disclaims clear knowledge of its grounds and reasons, we have only to answer, that while in part we sympathize with it, we dare not refuse the partial light thrown upon the problem in Scripture, and exhibited below. But if the design of these theologians be to assert, either (1) that this constitution is not just, or (2) that God's bare will makes it to be just, and that its being sovereign is the ground of its being righteous, Ave protest against it as a grievous heresy. 9. What is the orthodox ansiver to the above question in iclnch the Romish Lutheran and Reformed Theologians as a body concur ? It is certain that while there has been difference of opin- ion and looseness of statement as to the grounds of our just i accountability for Adam's first sin, the whole Church has always / regarded our loss of original rigliteousness and innate moral ' corruption to be a just and righteous, not sovereign, penal ', consequence of Adam's apostatizing act. This is the doctrine, ' agreement with which is alike accordant with Scripture, honor- ing to the moral attributes of God and the equity of his moral government, and conformable to historical ortliodoxy. In the explanation of this doctrine the orthodox have often differed. It is a simple fact that God as a just judge condemned the Avhole race on account of Adam's sin, and condemnation by God, the soiu'ce of life, involves and is justly followed by spir- itual and moral death. 23 35-4 IMPUTATION OF ADAM'S FIRST SIN. 10. Where is the/act asserted in Scripture that God condemned the ivhole race because of Adams apostasy ? Rora. V. 17-19. — \"For if by one man's offence death reigned by one;\" \"Therefore, as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation ; \" \" For as by one man's disobe- dience many were made sinners.\"", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "112", "sort_key": 112, "group": "Chapter XX", "question": "Shoio that in this doctrine the ivhole Church has concurred?", "answer": "The sin of Adam was an act of apostasy. The spiritual desertion and consequent spiritual corruption Avhich immedi- ately occiu-red in his personal experience (the very penalty threatened) was, of course, a just penal consequence of that act. Augustine said (\"De Nupt. et Concup.\" II. xxxiv.) — \" Nothing remains but to conclude that in that first man all are understood to have sinned, because all were in him when he sinned; whereby sin is brought in with birth, and not removed save b}'' the new birth.\" Dr. G. F. Wiggers, the learned expounder of \" Augustinian- ism and Pelagiauism, from the Original Sources,\" says in his statement of Augustine's view of original sin, ch. 5, division 2, § 2. \"The propagation of Adam's sin among his posterity is a punishment of the same sin. The corruption of human nature, in the whole race, was the righteous punishment of the transgression of the first man, in whom all men already existed.\" The \"Council of Trent,\" Sess. v., 1 and 2, says that \"sin wdiich is the death of tlie soul \" was part of that penalty which Adam incurred by his transgression, and which is therefore transmitted to his descendants as well as inflicted on himself\" Bellarmin, ^^ Amiss. Grat.\" iii. 1, says, \"The penalty which properly corresponds with the first sin is the forfeiture of orig- inal righteousness and of those supernatural gifts with which God had furnished our nature.\" Luther (in Genes. 1, p. 98, cap. 5,) says, that the image of Adam in which Seth \\vas begotten \" included original sin, and the penalty of eternal death inflicted because of the sin of Adam.\" Melanchthon (\"Explicatio Symboli Niceni. Corp. Refor.,\" xxiii. 403 and 583) says, \"Adam and Eve merited guilt and depravity for their descendants.\" \" Formula Concordia?,\" p. 639 and p. 643, Hase ed. — \" Espe- cially since by the seduction of Satan, througli the fall, by the just judgment of God in the punishment of men, concreated or original righteousness was lost . . . and human nature corrupted.\" THE CONSENSUS OF THE CHURCHES SHOU\\N. 355 \"Apol. Aug. Conf.,\" p. 58. — \"In Genesis the penalty im- posed for original sin is described. For there was human nature subjected not only to deatli and corporeal evils, but also to the reign of the devil. . . , Defect and concupiscence are both penal evils and sins.\" Quenstedt (tUi88), \" Ques. Theo. Did.,\" Pol. L, 994— \"It was not simply of the good pleasure or the absolute sovereignty of God, but of the highest justice and equity, that the sin, which Adam as the root and origin of the whole himian race committed, should be imputed to us, and propagated in us so as to constitute us guilty.\" Both the Second Helvetic, Ch. 8, and the Gallic Confessions, Art. 9, say that Adam, \"by his own fault {cylpa) became sub- ject to sin, and such as he became after the fall, such are all who were propagated by him, they being subject to sin, death, and various calamities.\" Peter ^lartyr. Professor at Zurich (1500-15G1), as quoted by Turretin (Loco ix., 2, 9, § 43), says, \"Assuredly there is no one who can doubt that original sin (inherent) is inflicted upon us in revenge and punishment of the first fall.\" Calvin. — \"God by a just judgment condemned us to wrath in Adam, and willed us to be born corrupt on account of his sin.\" Ursinus (1534^1583), friend of Melanchthon, professor at Heidelberg and author of the \"Heidelberg Catechism,\" says (Qua?st. 7, pp. 40, 41), \"original sin\" (inherent) \"passes over\" te their descendants, \"not through the body, nor through the soul, but through the impure generation of the whole man, on account of (propter) the guilt of our first parents, on account of which, God, by a just judgment, Avliile he creates our souls, at the same time deprives them of the original rectitude and gifts which he had conferred upon the parents.\" L. Dangeus (1530-1596). — \"There are three things whicli constitute a man guilty before God: 1. The sin flowing from this that Ave have all sinned in the first man. 2. Corruption, which is the punishment of this sin, which fell upon Adam and upon all his posterity. 3. Actual sins.\" Theodore Beza (1519-1605), on Romans xii., etc. — \"As Adam, by the commission of sin, first was made guilty of the wrath of God, then, as being guilty, underwent as the punish- ment of his sin the corruption of soul and body, so also he transmitted to posterity a nature in the first place guilty, next, corrupted.\" J. Arminius, of Leyden (1560-1609). — \"Whatever punish- ment, therefore, was inflicted on our first parents, has gone down through and now rests on all their posterity; so that 356 IMPUTATION OF ADAM'S FIRST SIN. all are children of wrath by nature, being obnoxious to con- demnation . . . and to a destitution of righteousness and true holiness,\" \"are destitute of original righteousness, which penalty is usually called a loss of the divine image, and orig- inal sin.\" G. J. Vossius, Leyden (1577-1649), \"Hist. Pelag.,\" Lb. ii., 1. — 1. \"The Catholic Church has always thus decided, that the first sin is 'imputed to all; that is, that its effects are, according to the just judgment of God, transmitted to all the children of Adam ... on account whereof we are born without original righteousness.\" Synod of Dort (1618). — \"Such as man was after the fall, such children also he begat, . . . by the propagation of a vicious nature, by the just judgment of God.\" Francis Turretin, Geneva (1623-1687), Locus 9, Q. 9, §§ 6, 14. Amesius, \"Medulla Theolog.,\" Lib. prim., cap. 17. — \"2. This propagation of sin consists in two parts, in imputation and in real communication. 3. By imputation that single act of disobe- dience which Adam committed is made also ours. 4. By real communication, not indeed the single sin. 5. Original sin, since it essentially consists in deprivation of original righteousness, and this deprivation follows the first sin as a penalty, this has in the first instance the nature of a penalty rather than of a sin. Inasmuch as that original righteousness is denied by the justice of God, so far forth it is penalty ; inasmuch as it ought to be present and is absent by human fault, so far fortii it is sin. 6. Therefore this privation is handed down from Adam after the manner of ill-desert in so far as it is penalty, and after the manner of real efficiency in so far as it has adjoined to it the nature of sin.\" H. Witsius (1636-1708), \"Economy,\" Bk. L, ch. 8, §§ 33 and 34. — \" It is therefore necessary that the sin of Adam in ^nrtue of the covenant of works, be so laid to the charge of his posterity, Avho were comprised with him in the same covenant, that, on accomit of the demerit of his sin, they are born des- titute of original righteousness,\" etc. \"Formula Consensus Helvetica\" (1675), canon x. — \"But there appears no way in which hereditary corruption could fall, as spiritual death, upon the whole human race by the just judgment of God, unless some sin of that race preceded, incurring the penalty of that death. For God, the supremely just Judge of all the earth, punishes none but the guilty.\" Westminster \"Conf and Cat\"; \" Conf Faith,\" ch. vii., § 2 and ch. vi., § 3; \"L. Cat.,\" 22 and 25; \"S. Cat.,\" 18. President Witherspoon, \"Works,\" Vol. IV., p. 96. — \"It seems very plain that the state of corruption and wicked- IMPUTATION DEFINED. 357 ness which men are now in, is stated in Scripture as being the effect and punishment of Adam's first sin.\" See also the truth of this position affirmed by Dr. The. Chahners, \"Institutes of Theology,\" part 1, ch. 6; and by Dr. William Cunningham; \"Theology of the Keformation,\" Essay vii., § 2; Dr. James Thornwell, \"Collected Writings,\" Vol. L, pp. 479, 559, 561, etc. ; and a learned article by Prof Geo. P. Fisher, of New Haven, Theo. Sem., in the \"New Englander,\" July, 1868. ~' Thus we have the consensus of Catholic and Protestant, Lutheran and Eeformed, of Supralapsarian and Infralapsarian, of Goraar and Arminius, of the Synod of Dort and the West- minster Assembly, of Scotland and of New England. 12, Why was this doctrine expressed technically as the imputa- tion of the guilt of Adams apostatizing act ? and state the meaning of tlue terms. At the Council of Trent Albertus Pighius and Ambrosius Catherinus (F. Paul's \" Hist. Con. Trent,\" Lib. ii., s., 65) main- tained that the imputed guilt of Adam's first sin constituted the only ground of the condemnation which rests upon men at birth. The Council did not allow this heresy, but neverthe- less maintained a rather negative than positive view of man's inherent guilty corruption. Consequently Calvin and all the first Reformers and Creeds were principally concerned in em- phasizing the fact that original sin inherent., as distinguished \\ from original sin imputed, is intrinsically and justly, as moral corruption, worthy of God's wrath and curse. It is the reason why the salvation of infants is refea-red to the sovereign grace of God, and the expiatory merits of Christ, and it continues in adults the source of all actual sin and the main ground of condemnation to eternal death. Infants and adults sufter, and adults are damned on account of the guilt of inherent sin, but never on account of Adam's sin imputed. But when the question is asked why God, either directly or indirectly, brings us into existence tlius corrupt, the whole church answered as above shown, because God has thereby justly punished us for Adam's apostasy. This is technically expressed as the \" imputation to us of the guilt of Adam's act.\" \"Guilt\" is just liability to punishment. The recognition' of guilt is a judicial and not sovereign act of God. \"Imputation\" (the Hebrew iw'n and the Greek XoylZ,oi.iai frequently occurring and translated \"to count,\" \"to reckon,\" \"to impute,\" etc.) is simply to lay to one's charge as a jiist ground of legal procedure, whether the thing imputed antecedently 358 IMPUTATION OF ADAM'S FIRST SIN. belonged to the person to whom it is charged, or for any other adequate reason he is justly responsible for it. Thus not to im- pute sin to the doer of it, is of course graciously to refrain from charging the guilt of his own act or state upon him as a ground of punishment; Avhile to impute righteousness without works is graciously to credit the believer with a righteousness which is not personally his own. — Rom. iv. 6, 8; 2 Cor. v. 19; see Num. XXX. 15; xviii. 22-27, 30; Lev. v. 17, 18; vii. 18; xvi. 22; Rom. ii. 26; 2 Tim. iv. 16, etc. The imputation, i. e., judicial charging of Adam's sin to us, is rather to be considered as contemplating the race as a whole, as one moral body, than as a series of individuals. The race was condemned as a whole, and hence each individual comes into existence in a state of just antenatal forfeiture. Turretin calls it '■'■commune jjcccaium, communis eulpa^' L. 9, Q. 9. This and this alone is what the church has meant by this doctrine. Afterwards in our own persons God condemns us only and most justly because of our inherent moral corruption and our actual transgressions. The imputation of the guilt of Adam's aposta- tizing act to us in common leads judicially to spiritual desertion in particular, and spiritual desertion leads by necessary conse- quence to inherent depravity. The imputation of our sins in common to Christ leads to his desertion (^latt. xxvii. 46), but his temporary desertion leads to no tendency to iidierent sin, because he was the God-man. The imputation of Christ's right- eousness to us is the condition of the restoration of the Holy Ghost, and that restoration leads by necessary consequence to regeneration and sanctification. \" It is only when justifcatio forensls maintains its Reformation position at the head of the process of salvation, that it has any firm or secure standing at all.\"— Dr. J. A. Dorner's \" Hist. Prdt. Theo.,\" Vol. II., p. 160. 13. What is the origin of the Distinction heticeen the 3IecUate and the Immediate ImjDutat ion of Adam's sin, and what has been the usage loith respect to those terms anwng theologians ? As above shown, from the beginning, the universal Church has agreed in holding that the guilt of Adam's first sin was directly charged to the account of tlie human race in mass, just as it was charged to himself, and punished in the race by desertion and consequent depravity, just as it was punished in him. This was uniformly expressed by the technical phrase, the imputation of the guilt of liis first sin to his descendants. In the first half of the seventeenth century, Joshua Placasus, professor at Saumur, was universally understood to deny any imputation of Adam's sin to his posterity, and to admit only inherent innate corruption as derived from Adam by natural MEDIATE AND IMMEDIATE IMPUTATION. 359 generation. This was explicitly condemned by the French National Synod at Charenton, 1G45; and repudiated by all orthodox theologians, Lutheran and Reformed. Placeeus sub- sequently originated the distinction between Immediate and ]\\lediate Imputation. By the former he meant the direct charg- ing of the guilt of Adam's sin antecedent to their own sinful state. By the latter he meant that we are found guilty with Adam of his apostasy because in virtue of inherent depravity we are apostates also. He denied the former and admitted the latter. It is obvious — 1st. That this doctrine of mediate imputation alone is virtually the \" New England Eoot Theory,\" above dis- cussed, which refers the abandoning of the human race to the operation of the natural law of inheritance to the sovereign will, instead of to the just judgment, of God. 2d. It is a denial of the universal doctrine of the Church that Adam's sin is justly charged to his descendants as to him- self, and punished in them by depravity as it was punislied in himself That imputation was obviously, whatever its ground, purely immediate and antecedent. 3d. It is evident that Adam's sin can not at the same time be both immediately and mediately imputed to the same effect. It would be absurd to think that mankind are judicially pini- ished with inherent corruption as a just pmnshment for Adam's sin, and at the same time counted guilty of Adam's sin because they are afl&icted with tiiat punishment. It is for this reason that so many advocates of the church doctrine of immediate imputation deny that imputation can in any sense be mediate. 4th. But the penalty of Adam's sin was \" Death\"; that is, all penal evils, temporal, and eternal. The strongest advocates of immediate imputation, in order to account for the infliction of innate inherent sin, admit that all tlie oilier elements of the pen- alty denounced upon Adam come upon us because of our own inherent and actual sins. — See Turretin, L. 9, Quajs. 9, § 14, and \"Princeton Essays.\" 5th. The immediate imputation of the guilt of Adam's sin is to the race as a whole, and respects each individual antecedently to his existence as a judicial cause of his commencing that ex- istence in a depraved condition. When each single man is con- sidered in himself personally and subsequent to birth, all agree that he is condemned with Adam because of a common inherent depravity and life. 6tli. JNIanj'- found difficulty in conceiving how inherited in- herent corruption can be guilt as well as pollution. Their idea was that a sinful state must originate in the free choice of the pei'son concerned, in order to invoke the moral responsibility 3G0 IMPUTATION OF ADAM'S FIRST SIN. implied by guilt. Yet all acknowledge that inherent corrup- tion is guilt. Some tacitly accounted for this on the principle of Edwards, that \" the essence of the virtue or vice of disposi- tions of the heart lies not in their cause, but in their nature.\" Others, however, held that the guilt inherent in innate sin is due to the fact that this sin is connected as an effect with the apostasy of Adam. If the question then be. Why the race is under ban, and we are allowed to commence our moral agency in a depraved condition ? all the ortliodox answer in terms or in effect, \"Because of the most just immediate imputation of Adam's first sin.\" If the question be, Why are we severally, after birth, judged guilty as well as corrupt, and why are we punished with all the temporal and eternal penal evils denounced upon Adam ? many of the orthodox say, \" Because of our own inherent sin mediating the full imputation of his sin.\" Andrew Quenstedt, Wittenberg (tl688), \"Theo. Did. Pol.,\" I., 998. — \"The first sin of Adam is imputed to us immediately inasmuch as we exist liitherto in Adam. But the sin of Adam is imputed to us mediatel}^ in so far as we are regarded indi- vidually and in our own proper persons.\" F. Turretin, Geneva (tl687), Locus 9, Qua3st. 9, § 14. — \"The penalty which sin brings upon us is either privative or posi- tive. The former is the want or privation of original right- eousness. The latter is death both temporal and eternal, and in general all evils which are sent upon sinners. . . . With respect to the former we say that the sin of Adam is imputed to us immediately to the effect of the privative penalty, be- cause it is the cause of the privation of original righteousness, and so ought to go before privation, at least in the order of nature; but as to the latter, the positive penalty may be said to be mediately imputed, because we are not obnoxious to that, unless after we are born and corrupt.\" Hence — (1.) All in effect admit immediate imputation, and deny mediate imputation alone. (2.) Many ignore the distinc- tion, which never emerged till the time of Placasus. (3.) A number, in the senses above shown, assert both. 14. How is tills Doctrine 'proved by the analogy which Paid (Rom. V. 12-21) asserts between our condemnation in Adam and our justification in Christ? \" Therefore as by the offence of one, judgment came upon all men to condemnation ; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.\" The analogy here asserted is as to the fact and nature of the imputation in both cases, not at all as to the ground of it. THE GROUND OF THIS IMPUTATION. 361 Christ is one with his elect because of the gracions appointment of the Father and his vokintary assumption of their nature. Adam is one with his descendants because he is their natural head, and because of the g-racious appointment of God. In these respects the cases differ. But the cases are identical in so far as in view of the oneness in both cases subsisting, we are justl}' charged with the guilt of Adam's first sin and pun- ished therefor, and Christ is justly charged with the guilt of our \" many offences \" and punished therefor, and we are justly credited with the merit of his righteousness and accepted, re- generated, and saved therefor. — See above Ques. 12. If the imputation of Christ's righteousness is immediate the imputation of Adam's sin must be the same, though the basis of the one is grace it is no less just, and though the basis of the other be justice, the original constitution from which it originated is no less gracious. 15. How have ortliodox fJteohgians explained the GROuxo/or this universcdhj assumed judicial charging of the guilt of Adams apos- tatising act to his descendants ? They are generally agreed that the race is justly responsible for the judicial consequences of that act. Beyond this the ac- counts rendered of the matter have been different, and often vague. 1st. Augustine conceived of the race as essentially one. As far as Adam is considered as a person his sin was his own, but as far as the entire race in its essential undistributed, unindi- vidualized form of existence was in him, his act was the apos- tasy of that whole race, and the common nature being both guilty and depraved is justly distributed to eacli individual in that condition and under that condemnation. The Avhole race was not personally nor individually, but virtually or potentially, coexistent and coactive in him. — Dr. Philip Schaff in \" Lange on Ptom.,\" pp. 191-196; Dr. Geo. P. Fisher, \"New Englander,\" July, 1860. This is a mode of thought which at least presup- poses Realism, and language to the same effect became tradi- tional in the church, and has been used in a general sense by many, who were in no degree philosophical realists, wlien treat- ing of our relation to Adam. Forms of expression originating in this view have lingered among theologians Avho have ex- plicitly rejected realism, and have definitely substituted for it a different explanation of the facts. The whole race has been considered one organically, and Ave have been said to have been in Adam as branches in a tree, etc. Such renderings of the matter have continued to late times, and been commingled Avith others essentially different, as that of representation, etc. 362 IMPUTATION OF ADAM'S FIRST SIN. It is, however unsatisfactoiy as an explanation of gnilt, in the higliest degree orthodox, both because of the nnmber and high authority of the writers who have used it, and because it ira- phes the highest conceivable ground of immediate imputa- tion. The apostatising act is imputed to us, as it is imputed to Adam, \" because we were guilty coagents with him in that act.\"— Shedd's \"Essays.\" 2d. The Federal View presupposes the natural relation. Adam stands before God in Eden a free, responsible, fallible moral agent, with an animal body and a generative nature. Without a miracle his children must be carried along with him in his destinies. His own status was and must ever continue according to bare law contingent upon free-will. God, there- fore, as the benevolent and righteous guardian of the interests of all moral creatures, graciously constituted him the federal head and representative of his race as a whole, and promised him for himself and for all eternal life, or confirmed holiness and happiness, on condition of temporary obedience under favora- ble conditions, with the penalty for him and for thetn of death, or condemnation and desertion, on condition of disobedience. This was an act of grace to him, as it substituted a temporal for an eternal probation. It was no less an act of grace for the race, for reasons stated below. This \" Federal Theology \" was developed and introduced in all its fulness of detail and bearings by Coccejus (1602-1669), Prof at Franecker and Ley den. It was regarded as eminently a Scriptural system, supplanting the prevailing scholasticism, and destroying forever the influence of supralapsarian speciila- tions, and it gradually found acceptance, under appropriate mod- ifications, with Lutherans and xA.rminians as well as Calvinists. Two things however are historically certain — Ist. That the idea of a covenant with Adam including his descendants had long before been clearly conceived and prominently advanced. This was done by Catherinus before the \" Council of Trent \"' (Father Paul's \" Hist. Council Trent,\" pp. 175, 177), and by such men among Protestants as Hyperius (tl567), Olevianus (circum. 1563), and Eaphael Eglin (Dorner's '-Hist. Prot. Theo.,\" Vol. II., pp. 31-45). 2d. That the essential ideas of federal representation Avere long and very generally prevalent ainong Protestant theologi- ans from the beginning. Dr. Charles P. Krauth says, with re- spect to Lutheran theology as a whole, \" The reasons assigned for the imputation and transmission centre in the representa- tive character of Adam (and Eve). The technicalities of the federal idea are late in appearing, but the essential idea itself comes in from the beginning in our theology.\" j\\Ielanchthon THE AUGUSTINIAN THEORY EXAMINED. 363 said, \" Adam and Eve merited guilt and depravity for their pos- terity, because integrity had been bestowed on our first parents, that they might preserve tliem for their entire posterity, and in this trial they re^jresoi/erf the Avhole human race.\" — \"Expli- catio Symboli Niceni, Corp. Refor.,\" xxiii. 403 and 583. Chemnitz (1522-1586), \"Loci. Theo.,\" fol. 213, 214, says, \"God deposited those gifts with which he willed to adorn human nature with Adam, on this condition, that if he kept them for himself he should keep them for his posterity; but if he lost them and depraved himself, he should beget children after his own likeness.\" — Hutter, \\Yittenberg (flGlG), Lb. \" Chr. Con. Expli.,\" 90. \"Adam represented the whole human race.\" Thus also James Arminius (flOOP) (Disp. 31, Thes. ix); John Owen (1616-1683) (\"Justification,\" p. 286), and West \"Conf Faith,\" Ch. vii. § 2, and \"L. Cat.,\" -I'l (1646 and 1647). Heuce it appears that when theological writers, subsequent to the prevalence of the realistic philosophy, explain our moral oneness with Adam by the uninterpreted general phrases \"that we sinned in him being in his loins,\" or \" he being our Root,\" they are not to be understood as excluding all reference to rep- resentation, or to covenant responsibility. The language, holds true under either theory, or when both are combined in one notion. And from the interchange of terms it is certain, that ver}^ often both theories were latent under a common general notion. 16. What can he fairly adduced in siqiport of the Augiistinian mode of explaining our moral oneness with Adam? This view explains our moral oneness entirely on the ground of his being the natural head and root of the race, and the con- sequent physical or organic oneness of the whole race in him. It may be fairly argued in behalf of this view — 1st. That if it can be proved that we were \"guilty coagents with Adam in his sin,\" the highest and most satisfactory reason possible is assigned for the righteous immediate imputation of the guilt of that sin to us. 2d. The analogy, as far as it goes, of all God's providential dealings, both general and special, with mankind. God's cove- nants with Xoah, Abraham, and David embrace the children with the parents, and rest upon the natural relations of gen- erator and generated. The constitutions alike of the Jewish and Christian Churches provide that the rights of infants are predetermined by the status of their parents. This is, of course, determined by a gracious covenant, yet that covenant presup- poses the more fundamental and general natural relation of generation and education. All human condition and charac- 364 IMPUTATION OF ADAM'S FIRST SIN. ter, aside from any snpeniatiiral intervention, is determined by historical conditions. Hugh Miller (\"Testimony of the Rocks\") says, as a Christian scientist: \"It is a fact broad and palpable as the economy of natm-e, that . . . lapsed progenitors, when cut off from civilization and alf external interference of a mis- sionary character, become founders of a lapsed race. The in- iquities of the parents are visited upon their children.\" \" It is one of the inevitable consequences of that nature of man which the Creator ' bound fast in fate,' while he left free his will, that the free-will of the parent should become the destiny of the child.\" 17. Wliat can he fairly argued against the siiffiiiency of tins explanation of tlw ground of the immediate imputation of the guilt of Adams first sin ? 1st. Observe (1) that the Jewish and Christian Churches, to whom the second commandment (Ex. xx. 5) was given, and the children of Noah, Abraham, and David were embraced under special gracious covenants. (2.) Observe that in cases in wdiich God visits the iniquities of parents upon their chil- dren in natural providence, irrespective of an}' special cove- nant obligations, God is acting with a most just though sov- ereign discretion in dealing with rebels already under -previous righteous condemnation. 2d. When the Natural Headship of Adam is referred to in general terms, and we are said to have been in him as a \"Eoot,\" or as \"branches in a tree,\" the notion is unsatisfactory, because (1) utterly indefinite. (2.) Because it is, as far as it goes, material and mechanical, and therefore utterly fails to explain moral responsibility, which is essentially spiritual and personal. (3.) Besides this notion at least latently assumes the fallacy that the laAvs of natural development are either necessary limits of divine agency, or agents independent of him, or independent concauses with him. The truth simply being that the constitution of nature is the creature and in- strument of God. (4.) This theory assigns no reason, either on the ground of principle or analogy, why only the first sin of Adam, and not all the subsequent sins of all ancestors, is imputed to posterity as the ground of parental forfeiture. 3d. The idea of a non-personal but virtual or ])otential co- existence and coagency (see Dr. W. G. T. Shedd's \"Essays\" and \" Hist. Christ. Doc,\" and Dr. Philip Schafi\"s \" Lange. Eom.,\" pp. 192-194) as the sole basis of just moral responsi- bility has no support in that testimony of Consciousness, which is our oidy citadel of defence from materialism, naturalism, and pantheism. Consciousness gives us no conception of sin THE FEDERAL THEORY COMMENDED. 365 but as a state or an act of a free personal agent. Even if im- personal, virtual, potential, moral coagency be a fact, it tran- scends both consciousness and understanding, and being dark itself can throw no light upon the mysterious facts it is ad- duced to explain and to justify. 4th. When the attempt is made to expound this theory in the full sense of realistic philosophy' the case does not appear to be improved. (1.) In pure realism humanity is a single, generic, spiritual substance whicli voluntarily apostatized and corrupted itself in Adam. Human persons are the individual manifestations of this common spirit in connection with separate bodily or- ganizations. But — (rt.) If we so far leave consciousness be- hind how can we defend ourselves from pantheism? (6.) How are individual spirits justified and sanctified while the general spirit remains corrupt and guilty? (c.) How did the Logos be- come incarnate? (c/.) How, finally, will part of this spiritual substance be eternally glorified, while another part is eternally damned. '*' (2.) Dr. Shedd explains that the generic spiritual substance whicli sinned has since, through the agency of Adam, been dis- tributed and explicated into a series of individuals. But can a spirit be divided and its parts distributed, each part an agent as the whole was from which it was separated? Is not this to confound the attributes of spirit and matter, and to explain spirit as material, and is not sin pre-eminently spiritual and personal ? 18. State the reasoiis luMcli establish the superior satisfactory charaxier of the Federal Theory of our oneness with Adam ? 1st. The federal headship of Adam presupposes and rests upon his natural headship. He was our natural head before he was our federal head. He was doubtless made our federal representative because he was our natural progenitor, and was so conditioned that his agency must affect our destinies, and because our very nature was on trial (typically if not essen- tially) in him. Whatever, therefore, of virtue in this explana- tion the natural headship of Adam may be supposed to contain the federal theory retains. 2d. The Covenant as shown above was an act of supreme divine grace to Adam himself It Avas still more so as it respects his descendants. All God's moral creatures are intro- duced into existence in a condition of real, thougli instable, moral integrity'. This is obviously true of men and angels, and certainly equitable. They must, therefore, pass through a probation either limited or unlimited. Adam was under coudi- 36G IMPUTATION OF ADAM'S FIRST SIN. tions to stand that graciously limited probation with every conceivable advantage. But, apparently, his descendants could have no fair probation except in his person. \"Three plans exhaust the possible. (1.) The whole race might have been left under their natural rehition to God forever. (2.) Each might have been left to stand for himself under a gracious covenant of works. (3.) That the race as a whole should stand for a limited period represented in its natural head. The first would have certainly led to universal sin. The second is the one Pelagians suppose actual. The third is incomparably the most advantageous for the whole.\" Dr. Robert L. Dabney's \" Syllabus.\" The separate probation of nascent souls in infant bodies was certainly not to be preferred. 3d. God certainly did as a matter of fact condition Adam with a promise of \" Life,\" and the alternative of \" Death,\" upon a special and temporally limited probationary test. The precise penalty threatened upon him, has been in its general sense and special terms (Gen. ii. 17 and iii. 16-19) inflicted upon all his posterity. 4th. This view also is confirmed by the analogy which the Scriptures assert existed between the imputation of Adam's first sin to us, and the imputation of our sins to Christ, and of his righteousness to us. This, of course, implies necessarily that the race is one with Adam, and the elect one with Christ. And the analogy certainly is the more complete on the federal view of Adam's union with the race, than on that view which ignores it. Both the Covenant of Grace including the elect, and the Covenant of Works including the race, were gracious. Christ voluntarily assumed his headship out of love. Adam obediently assumed his out of interest and duty. God graciously chose the elect out of love, and graciousty included the descendants of Adam in his representation out of benevolence. Does not the remaining mystery lose itself in that abyss which is opened by i\\\\Qfaet of the 2Jermission of sin, before which all schools of Theists on this side the veil must bow in silence.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "113", "sort_key": 113, "group": "Chapter XXII", "question": "What is the nsage qftlie ivord nnn in the Hebrew Scriptures?", "answer": "This word occurs more than two hundred and eighty times in the Old Testament, and is in our translation in the vast majority of instances represented by the English word \"Cove- nant,\" in a number of instances by the word \" League,\" Jos. ix. 15, etc., and once each by the words \"Confederate,\" Gen. xiv. 13, and \" Confederacy,\" Obad. 7. 3G8 THE COVENANT OF GRACE. It is used to express. — 1st. A natural ordinance. \" God's covenant with the day, the night,\" etc. — Jer. xxxiii. 20. 2d. A covenant of one man with another. Jonathan and David. — 1 Sam. xviii. 3 and ch. xx. David and Abner. — 2 Sam. iii. 13. 3d. The covenant of God with Noah, Gen. vi. 18, 19, as to his family; and with the human race in him. Gen. ix. 9. The boAv was \" a token of a covenant.\" — Gen. ix. 13. 4th. The \"Covenant of Grace\" with Abraham, Gen. xvii. 2-7, which Paul calls the \"gospel,\" Gal. iii. 17. Circumcision was the \"token of this covenant.\" — Gen. xvii. 11; comp. Acts vii. 8. 5th. The same covenant as formed generally with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. — Ex. ii. 24, etc. 6th. The same covenant, with special and temporary modifi- cations of form, constituting the National-Ecclesiastical Cove- nant of God with the people of Israel. The law of this Covenant on its legal side was written by Moses first in a book (\"the book of the covenant,\" Ex. xxiv. 7), and then upon tables of stone (\"the words of the covenant, the ten commandments, Ex. xxxiv. 27, 28), which were afterwards deposited in a golden chest, \"the ark of the covenant.\" — Num. x. 33. 7th. The covenant with Aaron of an everlasting priesthood. Num. XXV. 12, 13. 8th. The covenant with David. — Jer. xxxiii. 21, 22; Ps. Ixxxix. 3, 4.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} -{"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "114", "sort_key": 114, "group": "Chapter XXII", "question": "What is the Neiv Testament usage of the term SiaOt/m]?", "answer": "This word occurs thirty-three times in the New Testament, and is almost uniformly translated covenant when it refers to the dealings of God with his ancient church, and testament when it refers to his dealings with his church under the gospel dispen- sation. Its fundamental sense is that of disposition, arrange- ment; in the classics generally that specific form of arrangement or disposition called a testament., which sense, however, it prop- erly bears in but one passage in the New Testament, viz., Ileb. ix. 16, 17. Although it is never used to designate that eternal Covenant of Grace which the Father made with the Son as the second Adam, in behalf of his people, yet it always designates either the old or the new dispensation, i. e., mode of adminis- tration of that changeless covenant, or some special covenant which Christ has formed with his people in the way of admin- istering the Covenant of Grace, e. r/., the covenants with Abra- ham and with David. Thus the disposition made by God with the ancient church through jMoses, the Old contrasted in the New Testament with the New Siadr/nr/ (Gal. iv. 24), was really a covenant, both civil DIFFERENT VIEWS HELD BY CALVINISTS. 3G9 and religious, formed between Jehovah and the Israehtes, yet alike in its legal element, \" which was added because of trans- gressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made,\" and in its symbolical and typical element teaching of Christ, it was in a higher view a dispensation, or mode of ad- ministration of the Covenant of Grace. So also the present gospel dispensation introduced by Christ assumes the form of a covenant between him and his people, including many gra- cious promises, suspended on conditions, yet it is evidently in its highest aspect that mode of aclministeriiig the changeless Covenant of Grace, which is called the \"new and better dispen- sation,\" in contrast with the comparatively imperfect \"old and first dispensation\" of that same covenant. — See 2 Cor. iii. 14; Heb. viii. 6, 8, 9, 10; ix. 15; Gal. iv. 24 The present dispensation of the Covenant of Grace by our Saviour, in one respect, evidently bears a near analogy to a 3vill or testamentary disposition, since it dispenses blessings which could^ be fully enjoyed only after, and by means of his death. Consequently Paul uses the word ^la^rj-HTj in one single passage, to designate the present dispensation of the Covenant of Grace in this interesting aspect of it. — Heb. ix. 16, 17. Yet since the various dispensations of that eternal covenant are always else- where in Scripture represented under the form of special ad- ministrative covenants, and not under the form of testaments, it is to be regretted that our translators have so frequently ren- dered this term 8iafJt]H7], by the specific word testament, instead of the word covenant, or by the more general word dispensa- tion.— See 1 Cor. iii. 6, 14; Gal. iii. 15; Heb. vii. 22; xii. 24; xiii. 20. 3. What are the three views as to the parties in the covenant of grace held by Calvinists ? These differences do not in the least involve the truth of any doctrine taught in the Scriptures, but concern only the form in which that truth may be more or less clearly presented. 1st. The first view regards the Covenant of Grace as made by God with elect sinners. God promising to save sinners as such on the condition of faith, they, when converted, promising faith and obedience. Christ in this view is not one of the par- ties to the covenant, but its Mediator in behalf of his elect, and their surety; {. e., he guarantees that all the conditions demanded of them shall be fulfilled by them through his grace. 2d. The second view supposes two covenants, the first, called the Covenant of Redemption, formed from eternity between the Father and the Son as parties. The Son promising to obey and sufier, the Father promising to give him a people and to grant 24 370 THE COVENANT OF GRACE. \\ them in him all spiritual blessings and eternal life. The second, called the Covenant of Grace, formed by God with the elect as < parties, Christ being mediator and surety in behalf of his people. 3d. As there are two Adams set forth in the Scripture, the one representing the entire race in an econom}^ of nature, and the otlier representing the whole body of the elect in an econ- omy of grace, it appears more simple to regard as the founda- tion of all God's dealings with mankind, of whatever class, only the two great contrasted Covenants of works and of grace. The fornwr made by God at the creation of the world with Adam, as the federal head and representative of all his posterity. Of the promises, conditions, penalty, and issue of that Covenant I have spoken under a former head, see Chapter XVII. The latter, or Covenant of Grace, formed in the counsels of eternity between the Father and the Son as contracting parties, the Son therein contracting as the Second Adam, representing all his people as their mediator and siu-ety, assuming their place and undertak- ing all their obligations, under the unsatisfied Covenant of Works, and undertaking to apply to them all the benefits se- cured by this eternal Covenant of Grace, and to secure the per- formance upon their part of all those duties which are involved therein. Thus in one aspect this Covenant may be viewed as contracted Avith the head for the salvation of the members, and in another as contracted with tlie members in their head and sponsor. For that which is a grace from God is a duty upon our part, as St. Augustine prayed, \"Da quod jubes, et jubes quod vis;\" and hence results this complex view of the Covenant. As embraced under one or other of these two great Cove- nants of works or of grace, every man in the world stands in God's sight. It is to be remembered, however, that in the sev- eral dispensations, or modes of administration of the eternal Covenant of Grace, Christ has contracted various special cove- nants with his people, as administrative provisions for carrying out the engagements, and for applying to them tlie benefits of his covenant with the Father. Thus, the covenant of Jehovah (the Second Person, see above, Chapter IX., Question 14) with Noah, the second natural head of the human I'amily, Gen. ix. 11, 15. The covenant with Abraham, the typical be- liever, bearing the visible sign and seal of circumcision, and thus founding the visible church as an aggregate of families. This covenant continues to be the charter of the visible church to this day, the sacraments of baptism and the Lord's supper now attaclied to it, signifying and sealing the benefits of the Covenant of Grace, to wit, eternal life, faith, repentance, obedi- ence, etc., on God's part, as matters of promise; on ours as matters of duty, i. e., so far as they are to be performed by DOCTRINE PROVED. 371 ourselves. — Compare Gen. xvii. 9-13, with Gal. iii. 15-17. The national covenant with the Jews, then constituting the visible church, Ex. xxxiv. 27. The covenant with David, the type of Christ as Mediatorial King, 2 Sam. vii. 15, 16; 2 Chron. vii. 18. The imiversal offers of the gospel during the present dispensa- tion, also, are presented in the form of a covenant. Salvation is offered to all on the condition of faith, but faitli is God's gift secured for and promised to the elect, and when given exercised by them. Ever}^ believer, when brought to the knowledge of the truth, enters into a covenant with his Lord, which he re- news in all acts of faith and praj^er. But these special covenants all and several are provisions for the administration of the eter- nal Covenant of Grace, and are designed solely to convey the benefits therein secured to those to whom they belong. For the statements of our standards upon this subject, com- pare \"Confession of Faith,\" chapter vii., section 3, with \"L. Cat.,\" Questions 30-36. 4. Prove from the Scri'ptures that a \" Covenant of Grace'' teas actually formed in eternity between the Divine Persons, in luhich the \"aS'oji\" represented this elect. 1st. As shown at the opening of this chapter such a Cove- nant is virtuall}'' implied in the existence of an eternal Plan of salvation mutually formed by and to be executed by three Persons. 2d. That Clu'ist represented his elect in that Covenant is necessarily implied in the doctrine of sovereign personal elec- tion to grace and salvation. Christ sajs of his sheep, \" Thine they were, and thou gavest them me,\" and \" Those whom thou gavest me I have kept,\" etc. — John xvii. 6, 12. 3d. The Scriptures declare the existence of the promise and conditions of such a Covenant, and present them in connec- tion.— Isa. liii. 10, 11. 4th. The Scriptures expressly affirm the existence of such a Covenant. — Isa. xlii. 6; Ps. Ixxxix. 3. 5th. Christ makes constant reference to a previous commis- sion he had received of his Father. — John x. 18; Luke xxii. 29. 6th. Christ claims a reward which had been conditioned upon the fulfillment of that commis.sion. — John xvii. 4. 7th. Christ constantly asserts that his people and his ex- pected glory are given to him as a reward by his Father. — John xvii. 6, 9, 24; Phil. ii. 6-11. 5. Who were the parties to this Covenant of Grace; what were its pj^omises or condifiom on the part of the Father; and u'hat its conditions on the part of tlw Son ? 372 THE COVENANT OF GRACE. 1st. The contracting parties were the Father representing the entire Godhead in its indivisible sovereignty; and, on the other hand, God the Son, as ^Mediator, representing all his elect people, and as administrator of the Covenant, standing their surety for their performance of all those duties which were involved on their part. 2d. The conditions upon the part of the Father were, (1\") all needful preparation, Heb. x. 5; Isa. xlii. 1-7; (2) support in his work, Luke xxii. 43; (3) a glorious reward, _/?rs^ in the exaltation of his theanthropic person \" above every name that is named,\" Phil. ii. 6-11, and the universal dominion committed to him as Mediator, John v. 22; Ps. ex. 1; and in committing to his hand the administration of all the provisions of the Cov- enant of Grace in behalf of all his people, Matt, xxviii. 18; John i. 12; xvii. 2; vii. 39; Acts ii. 33; and, secondly, in the salvation of all those for whom he acted, includiiig the provi- sions of regeneration, justification, sanctification, perseverance, and glory — Titus i. 2 ; Jer. xxxi. 33 ; xxxii. 40 ; Isa. xxxv. 10 ; liii. 10, 11; Dicks' \"Theo. Lect.,\" Vol. 1., pp. 506-509. 3d. The conditions upon the part of the Son were — (1.) That he should become incarnate, made of a woman, made under the law. — Gal. iv. 4, 5. (2.) That he should assume and fully discharge, in behalf of his elect, all violated conditions and incurred liabilities of the covenant of works. Matt. v. 17, 18, which he was to accomplish,_^r.s^, by rendering to the precept of the law a perfect obedience, Ps. xl. 8; Isa. xlii. 21; John ix. 4, 5; viii. 29; Matt. xix. 17; a,nd, secondly, in suffering the full penalty incurred by the sins of his people. — Isa. liii.; 2 Cor. v. 21; Gal. iii. 13; Eph. v. 2. 6. In 2vhat sense is Christ said to he the mediator of the Cove- nant of Grace ? Christ is the mediator of the eternal Covenant of Grace be- cause— 1st. As the one mediator between God and man, he con- tracted it. 2d. As mediator, he fulfils all its conditions in behalf of his people. 3d. As mediator he administers it and dispenses all its blessings. 4th. In all this, Christ was not a mere media- torial internuntius, as Moses is called (Gal. iii. 19), but he was mediator (1) plenipotentiary (Matt, xxviii. 18), and (2) as high priest actually effecting reconciliation by sacrifice (Rom. iii. 25). 5th. Tlie phrase jusdizT/i diaOr'/x7/? mediator of the covenant, is applied to Christ three times in the New Testament (Heb. viii. 6; ix. 15; xii. 24); but as in each case the term for covenant is qualified by either the adjective \"new\" or \"better, \" it evidently here is used to designate not the Covenant of Grace properly, but that new dispensation of that eternal cove- CHRIST THE MEDIATOR AND THE SURETY. 373 nant which Christ introduced in person in contrast to the less perfect administration of it which was instrumentally introduced by Moses. In the general administration of the Covenant of Grace, Christ has acted as sacerdotal mediator from the foun- dation of the world (Rev. xiii. 8). On the other hand, the first or \"old dispensation,\" or special mode of administering that Covenant visibly among men, was instrumentally, and as to visible form, \"ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator,\" i. e., ]\\loses (Gal. iii. 19). It is precisely in contradistinction to this relation which Moses sustained to the outward revelation of those symbolical and typical institutions, through which the Covenant of Grace was then administered, that the superior excellence of the \"new\" and \"better\" dispensation is declared to consist in this, that now Christ the \" Son in his own house\" visibly discloses himself as the true mediator in the spiritual and personal administration of his covenant. Hence he who from the beginning was the \"one mediator between God and man\" (1 Tim. ii. 5) now is revealed as in way of eminence, the mediator and surety of that eternal Covenant under the \"new\" and \" better \" dispensation of it, since now he is rendered visible in the fulness of his spiritual graces, as the immediate admin- istrator thereof, whereas under the \" first \" and \" old \" dispen- sation he was hidden. — See Sampson's Com. on Hebrews.\" 5th. As Mediator also Christ undertakes to give His people faith and repentance and every grace, and guarantees for them that they shall on their part exercise faith and repentance and every duty. 7. la what sense is Christ said to be Surety of the Covenant of Grace ? In the only instance in which the term surety is applied to Chi'ist in the New Testament (Heb. vii. 22), \"surety of a better testament,\" the word translated testament evidently is designed to designate the new dispensation of the Covenant of Grace, as contrasted with the old. Paul is contrasting the priesthood of Christ with the Levitical. He is priest or surety after a higher order, under a clearer revelation, and a more real and direct administration of grace, than were the typical priests descended from Aaron. Christ is oiu- surety at once as priest and as king. As priest because, as such, he assumes and discharges all our obligations under the broken covenant of works. iVs king (the two in him are inseparable, he is always a royal priest), because, as such, he administers the blessings of his covenant to his people, and to this end entering into covenants with them, offering them grace upon the condition of faith and obedience, 374 THE COVENANT OF GRACE. and then, as their surety, giving them the graces of faith and obedience, that they may fulfil their part. 8. What general method has characterized Christ's adminis- tration of his covenant under all dispensations ? The purchased benefits of the covenant are placed in Christ's hand, to be bestowed upon his people as free and sovereign gifts. From Christ to us they are all gifts, but from us to Christ many of them are duties. Thus, in the administration of the Covenant of Grace, many of these purchased blessings, which are to take eff\"ect in our acts, e. g., faith, etc., he demands of us as duties, and promises other benefits as a reward conditioned on our obedience. Thus, so to speak, he rewards grace with grace, and conditions grace upon grace. Promising faith to his elect, then working faith in them, then rewarding them for its exercise with peace of conscience, joy in the Holy Ghost, and eternal life, etc., etc.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "114", "sort_key": 114, "group": "Chapter XXII", "question": "What is the Neiv Testament usage of the term SiaOt/m]?", "answer": "This word occurs thirty-three times in the New Testament, and is almost uniformly translated covenant when it refers to the dealings of God with his ancient church, and testament when it refers to his dealings with his church under the gospel dispen- sation. Its fundamental sense is that of disposition, arrange- ment; in the classics generally that specific form of arrangement or disposition called a testament., which sense, however, it prop- erly bears in but one passage in the New Testament, viz., Ileb. ix. 16, 17. Although it is never used to designate that eternal Covenant of Grace which the Father made with the Son as the second Adam, in behalf of his people, yet it always designates either the old or the new dispensation, i. e., mode of adminis- tration of that changeless covenant, or some special covenant which Christ has formed with his people in the way of admin- istering the Covenant of Grace, e. r/., the covenants with Abra- ham and with David. Thus the disposition made by God with the ancient church through jMoses, the Old contrasted in the New Testament with the New Siadr/nr/ (Gal. iv. 24), was really a covenant, both civil DIFFERENT VIEWS HELD BY CALVINISTS. 3G9 and religious, formed between Jehovah and the Israehtes, yet alike in its legal element, \" which was added because of trans- gressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made,\" and in its symbolical and typical element teaching of Christ, it was in a higher view a dispensation, or mode of ad- ministration of the Covenant of Grace. So also the present gospel dispensation introduced by Christ assumes the form of a covenant between him and his people, including many gra- cious promises, suspended on conditions, yet it is evidently in its highest aspect that mode of aclministeriiig the changeless Covenant of Grace, which is called the \"new and better dispen- sation,\" in contrast with the comparatively imperfect \"old and first dispensation\" of that same covenant. — See 2 Cor. iii. 14; Heb. viii. 6, 8, 9, 10; ix. 15; Gal. iv. 24 The present dispensation of the Covenant of Grace by our Saviour, in one respect, evidently bears a near analogy to a 3vill or testamentary disposition, since it dispenses blessings which could^ be fully enjoyed only after, and by means of his death. Consequently Paul uses the word ^la^rj-HTj in one single passage, to designate the present dispensation of the Covenant of Grace in this interesting aspect of it. — Heb. ix. 16, 17. Yet since the various dispensations of that eternal covenant are always else- where in Scripture represented under the form of special ad- ministrative covenants, and not under the form of testaments, it is to be regretted that our translators have so frequently ren- dered this term 8iafJt]H7], by the specific word testament, instead of the word covenant, or by the more general word dispensa- tion.— See 1 Cor. iii. 6, 14; Gal. iii. 15; Heb. vii. 22; xii. 24; xiii. 20. 3. What are the three views as to the parties in the covenant of grace held by Calvinists ? These differences do not in the least involve the truth of any doctrine taught in the Scriptures, but concern only the form in which that truth may be more or less clearly presented. 1st. The first view regards the Covenant of Grace as made by God with elect sinners. God promising to save sinners as such on the condition of faith, they, when converted, promising faith and obedience. Christ in this view is not one of the par- ties to the covenant, but its Mediator in behalf of his elect, and their surety; {. e., he guarantees that all the conditions demanded of them shall be fulfilled by them through his grace. 2d. The second view supposes two covenants, the first, called the Covenant of Redemption, formed from eternity between the Father and the Son as parties. The Son promising to obey and sufier, the Father promising to give him a people and to grant 24 370 THE COVENANT OF GRACE. \\ them in him all spiritual blessings and eternal life. The second, called the Covenant of Grace, formed by God with the elect as < parties, Christ being mediator and surety in behalf of his people. 3d. As there are two Adams set forth in the Scripture, the one representing the entire race in an econom}^ of nature, and the otlier representing the whole body of the elect in an econ- omy of grace, it appears more simple to regard as the founda- tion of all God's dealings with mankind, of whatever class, only the two great contrasted Covenants of works and of grace. The fornwr made by God at the creation of the world with Adam, as the federal head and representative of all his posterity. Of the promises, conditions, penalty, and issue of that Covenant I have spoken under a former head, see Chapter XVII. The latter, or Covenant of Grace, formed in the counsels of eternity between the Father and the Son as contracting parties, the Son therein contracting as the Second Adam, representing all his people as their mediator and siu-ety, assuming their place and undertak- ing all their obligations, under the unsatisfied Covenant of Works, and undertaking to apply to them all the benefits se- cured by this eternal Covenant of Grace, and to secure the per- formance upon their part of all those duties which are involved therein. Thus in one aspect this Covenant may be viewed as contracted Avith the head for the salvation of the members, and in another as contracted with tlie members in their head and sponsor. For that which is a grace from God is a duty upon our part, as St. Augustine prayed, \"Da quod jubes, et jubes quod vis;\" and hence results this complex view of the Covenant. As embraced under one or other of these two great Cove- nants of works or of grace, every man in the world stands in God's sight. It is to be remembered, however, that in the sev- eral dispensations, or modes of administration of the eternal Covenant of Grace, Christ has contracted various special cove- nants with his people, as administrative provisions for carrying out the engagements, and for applying to them tlie benefits of his covenant with the Father. Thus, the covenant of Jehovah (the Second Person, see above, Chapter IX., Question 14) with Noah, the second natural head of the human I'amily, Gen. ix. 11, 15. The covenant with Abraham, the typical be- liever, bearing the visible sign and seal of circumcision, and thus founding the visible church as an aggregate of families. This covenant continues to be the charter of the visible church to this day, the sacraments of baptism and the Lord's supper now attaclied to it, signifying and sealing the benefits of the Covenant of Grace, to wit, eternal life, faith, repentance, obedi- ence, etc., on God's part, as matters of promise; on ours as matters of duty, i. e., so far as they are to be performed by DOCTRINE PROVED. 371 ourselves. — Compare Gen. xvii. 9-13, with Gal. iii. 15-17. The national covenant with the Jews, then constituting the visible church, Ex. xxxiv. 27. The covenant with David, the type of Christ as Mediatorial King, 2 Sam. vii. 15, 16; 2 Chron. vii. 18. The imiversal offers of the gospel during the present dispensa- tion, also, are presented in the form of a covenant. Salvation is offered to all on the condition of faith, but faitli is God's gift secured for and promised to the elect, and when given exercised by them. Ever}^ believer, when brought to the knowledge of the truth, enters into a covenant with his Lord, which he re- news in all acts of faith and praj^er. But these special covenants all and several are provisions for the administration of the eter- nal Covenant of Grace, and are designed solely to convey the benefits therein secured to those to whom they belong. For the statements of our standards upon this subject, com- pare \"Confession of Faith,\" chapter vii., section 3, with \"L. Cat.,\" Questions 30-36. 4. Prove from the Scri'ptures that a \" Covenant of Grace'' teas actually formed in eternity between the Divine Persons, in luhich the \"aS'oji\" represented this elect. 1st. As shown at the opening of this chapter such a Cove- nant is virtuall}'' implied in the existence of an eternal Plan of salvation mutually formed by and to be executed by three Persons. 2d. That Clu'ist represented his elect in that Covenant is necessarily implied in the doctrine of sovereign personal elec- tion to grace and salvation. Christ sajs of his sheep, \" Thine they were, and thou gavest them me,\" and \" Those whom thou gavest me I have kept,\" etc. — John xvii. 6, 12. 3d. The Scriptures declare the existence of the promise and conditions of such a Covenant, and present them in connec- tion.— Isa. liii. 10, 11. 4th. The Scriptures expressly affirm the existence of such a Covenant. — Isa. xlii. 6; Ps. Ixxxix. 3. 5th. Christ makes constant reference to a previous commis- sion he had received of his Father. — John x. 18; Luke xxii. 29. 6th. Christ claims a reward which had been conditioned upon the fulfillment of that commis.sion. — John xvii. 4. 7th. Christ constantly asserts that his people and his ex- pected glory are given to him as a reward by his Father. — John xvii. 6, 9, 24; Phil. ii. 6-11. 5. Who were the parties to this Covenant of Grace; what were its pj^omises or condifiom on the part of the Father; and u'hat its conditions on the part of tlw Son ? 372 THE COVENANT OF GRACE. 1st. The contracting parties were the Father representing the entire Godhead in its indivisible sovereignty; and, on the other hand, God the Son, as ^Mediator, representing all his elect people, and as administrator of the Covenant, standing their surety for their performance of all those duties which were involved on their part. 2d. The conditions upon the part of the Father were, (1\") all needful preparation, Heb. x. 5; Isa. xlii. 1-7; (2) support in his work, Luke xxii. 43; (3) a glorious reward, /?rs^ in the exaltation of his theanthropic person \" above every name that is named,\" Phil. ii. 6-11, and the universal dominion committed to him as Mediator, John v. 22; Ps. ex. 1; and in committing to his hand the administration of all the provisions of the Cov- enant of Grace in behalf of all his people, Matt, xxviii. 18; John i. 12; xvii. 2; vii. 39; Acts ii. 33; and, secondly, in the salvation of all those for whom he acted, includiiig the provi- sions of regeneration, justification, sanctification, perseverance, and glory — Titus i. 2 ; Jer. xxxi. 33 ; xxxii. 40 ; Isa. xxxv. 10 ; liii. 10, 11; Dicks' \"Theo. Lect.,\" Vol. 1., pp. 506-509. 3d. The conditions upon the part of the Son were — (1.) That he should become incarnate, made of a woman, made under the law. — Gal. iv. 4, 5. (2.) That he should assume and fully discharge, in behalf of his elect, all violated conditions and incurred liabilities of the covenant of works. Matt. v. 17, 18, which he was to accomplish,^r.s^, by rendering to the precept of the law a perfect obedience, Ps. xl. 8; Isa. xlii. 21; John ix. 4, 5; viii. 29; Matt. xix. 17; a,nd, secondly, in suffering the full penalty incurred by the sins of his people. — Isa. liii.; 2 Cor. v. 21; Gal. iii. 13; Eph. v. 2. 6. In 2vhat sense is Christ said to he the mediator of the Cove- nant of Grace ? Christ is the mediator of the eternal Covenant of Grace be- cause— 1st. As the one mediator between God and man, he con- tracted it. 2d. As mediator, he fulfils all its conditions in behalf of his people. 3d. As mediator he administers it and dispenses all its blessings. 4th. In all this, Christ was not a mere media- torial internuntius, as Moses is called (Gal. iii. 19), but he was mediator (1) plenipotentiary (Matt, xxviii. 18), and (2) as high priest actually effecting reconciliation by sacrifice (Rom. iii. 25). 5th. Tlie phrase jusdizT/i diaOr'/x7/? mediator of the covenant, is applied to Christ three times in the New Testament (Heb. viii. 6; ix. 15; xii. 24); but as in each case the term for covenant is qualified by either the adjective \"new\" or \"better, \" it evidently here is used to designate not the Covenant of Grace properly, but that new dispensation of that eternal cove- CHRIST THE MEDIATOR AND THE SURETY. 373 nant which Christ introduced in person in contrast to the less perfect administration of it which was instrumentally introduced by Moses. In the general administration of the Covenant of Grace, Christ has acted as sacerdotal mediator from the foun- dation of the world (Rev. xiii. 8). On the other hand, the first or \"old dispensation,\" or special mode of administering that Covenant visibly among men, was instrumentally, and as to visible form, \"ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator,\" i. e., ]\\loses (Gal. iii. 19). It is precisely in contradistinction to this relation which Moses sustained to the outward revelation of those symbolical and typical institutions, through which the Covenant of Grace was then administered, that the superior excellence of the \"new\" and \"better\" dispensation is declared to consist in this, that now Christ the \" Son in his own house\" visibly discloses himself as the true mediator in the spiritual and personal administration of his covenant. Hence he who from the beginning was the \"one mediator between God and man\" (1 Tim. ii. 5) now is revealed as in way of eminence, the mediator and surety of that eternal Covenant under the \"new\" and \" better \" dispensation of it, since now he is rendered visible in the fulness of his spiritual graces, as the immediate admin- istrator thereof, whereas under the \" first \" and \" old \" dispen- sation he was hidden. — See Sampson's Com. on Hebrews.\" 5th. As Mediator also Christ undertakes to give His people faith and repentance and every grace, and guarantees for them that they shall on their part exercise faith and repentance and every duty. 7. la what sense is Christ said to be Surety of the Covenant of Grace ? In the only instance in which the term surety is applied to Chi'ist in the New Testament (Heb. vii. 22), \"surety of a better testament,\" the word translated testament evidently is designed to designate the new dispensation of the Covenant of Grace, as contrasted with the old. Paul is contrasting the priesthood of Christ with the Levitical. He is priest or surety after a higher order, under a clearer revelation, and a more real and direct administration of grace, than were the typical priests descended from Aaron. Christ is oiu- surety at once as priest and as king. As priest because, as such, he assumes and discharges all our obligations under the broken covenant of works. iVs king (the two in him are inseparable, he is always a royal priest), because, as such, he administers the blessings of his covenant to his people, and to this end entering into covenants with them, offering them grace upon the condition of faith and obedience, 374 THE COVENANT OF GRACE. and then, as their surety, giving them the graces of faith and obedience, that they may fulfil their part. 8. What general method has characterized Christ's adminis- tration of his covenant under all dispensations ? The purchased benefits of the covenant are placed in Christ's hand, to be bestowed upon his people as free and sovereign gifts. From Christ to us they are all gifts, but from us to Christ many of them are duties. Thus, in the administration of the Covenant of Grace, many of these purchased blessings, which are to take eff\"ect in our acts, e. g., faith, etc., he demands of us as duties, and promises other benefits as a reward conditioned on our obedience. Thus, so to speak, he rewards grace with grace, and conditions grace upon grace. Promising faith to his elect, then working faith in them, then rewarding them for its exercise with peace of conscience, joy in the Holy Ghost, and eternal life, etc., etc.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "115", "sort_key": 115, "group": "Chapter XXII", "question": "What is the Arminian vieiu of the Covenant of Grace?", "answer": "They hold, 1st, as to the parties of the Covenant of Grace, that God offers it to all men, and that he actually contracts it with all believers. 2d. As to its promises, that they include all the temporal and eternal benefits of Christ's redemption. 3d. As to its conditions, that God now graciously accepts faith and evangelical obedience for righteousness, in the place of that perfect legal obedience he demanded of man under the cove- nant of works, the meritorious work of Christ making it consist- ent with the principles of divine justice for him so to do. Tliey regard all men as rendered by sufficient grace capable of fulfil- ling such conditiojis, if they will.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "116", "sort_key": 116, "group": "Chapter XXII", "question": "In what sense can faith he called a condition of salvation ?", "answer": "Faith is a condition sine qua non of salvation, i. e., no adult man can be saved if he does not believe, and every man that does believe shall be saved. It is, however, a gift of God and the first part or stage of salvation. Viewed on God's side it is the beginning and index of his saving work in us. Viewed on our side it is our duty, and must be our own act. It is, there- fore, as our act, the instrument of our union with Christ, and thus the necessary antecedent, tifough never the meritoiious cause, of the gracious salvation which follows. Faith as the condition is of course living faith, which necessarily brings forth \"confession\" and obedience. 11. What are the j)^'omises which Christ, as the administrator of the covenant of grace, makes to all those ivho believe ? THE HISTORY OF THE COVENANT. 375 The promise to Abraham to be a \" God to him and to his seed after him\" (Gen xvii. 7) embraces all others. All things alike, physical and moral, in providence and grace, for time and eternity, are to work together for our good. \"All are yours, and ye are Christ's, and Christ is God's.\" — 1 Cor. iii. 22, 23. This gospel covenant is often called the \" Covenant of Grace\" as distinguished from the \"Covenant of Redemption.\" See above, Q. 3, § 2. \" He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved, but he that believeth not shall be damned.\" Mark xvi. 16. 12. Prove that Christ loas mediator of men be/ore as ivell as after his advent in tlwfiesh. 1st. As mediator he is both priest and sacrifice, and as such it is affirmed that he is the \"Lamb slain from the foundation of the world,\" and a \"propitiation for the sins that are past.\" Rev. xiii. 8; Rom. iii. 25; Heb. ix. 15. 2d. He was promised to Adam. — Gen. iii. 15. 3d. In the 3d chapter of Gal. Paul proves that the promise made to Abraham (Gen. xvii. 7 ; xxii. 18) is the very same gos- pel that the apostle himself preached. Thus Abraham became the father of those that believe. 4th. Acts X. 43. — \"To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name, whosoever believeth on him shall receive remission of sin.\" — See 53d chap, of Is., also chap. xlii. 6. 5th. The ceremonial institutions of Moses were symbolical and typical of Christ's work; as symbols they signified Christ's merit and grace to the ancient worshipper for his present sal- vation, while as types they prophesied the substance which was to come. — Heb. x. 1-10; Col. ii. 17. 6th. Christ was the Jehovah of the old dispensation. — See above, Chap. IX., Question 14. 13. Prove that faith loas the condition of salvation before the advent of Christ, in the same sense that it is noiv. 1st. This is affirmed in the Old Testament. — Hab. ii. 4; Ps. ii. 12. 2d. The New Testament writers illustrate their doctrine of justification by faith by the examples of Old Testament be- lievers.— See Rom. iv., and Heb. xi. 14. Shoiv that Christ, as administrator of the Covenant of Grace, gave to the members of the Old Testament Church precisely the same pi'omises that he does to us. 1st. The promises given to Christ's ancient people clearly embrace all spiritual and eternal blessings, e. g., the promise 376 THE COVENANT OF GRACE. given to Abraham, Gen, xvii. 7, as expounded by Christ, Matt xxii. 32, and the promise given to Abraham, Gen. xxii. 18; xii. 3, as expounded by Paul, Gal. iii. 16; see also Is. xliii. 25; Ezek. xxxvi. 27; Dan. xii. 2, 3. 2d. Tliis is plain also from the expectation and prayers of God's peopje. — 51st Ps. and 16th Ps. ; Job xix. 24-27; Ps. Ixxiii. '1^-m. 15. How loas the covenant of grace administered from Adam to Abraham ? 1st. By promise. — Gen. iii. 15. 2d. By means of typical sacrifices instituted in the family of Adam. 3d. By me^-ns of immediate -revelations and appearances of the Jehovah, or divine mediator to his people. Thus \"the Lord\" is represented throughout the first eleven chapters of Genesis as \"speaking\" to men. That these promises and sac- rifices were then understood in their true spiritual intent is proved by Paul. — Heb. xi. 4-7. And that this administration of the covenant of grace reached many of the people of the earth, during this era, is proved by the history of Job in Arabia, of Abraham in Mesopotamia, and of Melchisedec in Canaan.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "117", "sort_key": 117, "group": "Chapter XXII", "question": "How tvas it administered from Abraham to Moses?", "answer": "1st. The promise given during the preceding period (Gen. iii. 15), is now renewed in the form of a more definite cove- nant, revealing the coming Saviour as in the line of Abraham's posterity through Isaac, and the interest of the whole world in his salvation is more fully set forth. — Gen. xvii. 7; xxii. 18. This Avas the gospel preached beforehand. — Gal. iii. 8. 2d. Sacrifices were contniued as before. 3d. The church, or company of believers, which existed from the beginning in its individual members, was now formed into a general body as an aggregate of families, by the institution of circumcision, as a visible symbol of the benefits of the cove- nant of grace, and as a badge of church membership. 17. What was the true nature of the covenant made by God ivith the Israelites through Moses ? It may be regarded in three aspects — 1st. As a national and political covenant, whereby, in a political sense, they became his people, under his theocratical government, and in this peculiar sense he became their God. The church and the state were identical. In one aspect the whole system had reference to this relation. 2d. It was in one aspect a legal covenant, because the moral THE HISTORY OF THE COVENANT. 377 law, obedience to which was the condition of the covenant of works, was prominently set forth, and conformity to this law was made the condition of God's favor, and of all national blessings. Even the ceremonial system in its merely literal, and apart from its symbolical aspect, was also a rule of ^vorks, for cursed was he that confirmeth not all the words of this law to do them. — Dent, xxvii. 26. 3d. But in the symbolical and typical significance of all the Mosaic institutions, they were a clearer and fuller revelation of the provisions of the Covenant of Grace than had ever be- fore been made. This Paul abundantly proves throughout the Epistle to the Hebrews. — Hodge on Romans. 18. What are the characteristic differences between the dispensa- tion of the Covenant of Grace under the laio of Moses and after the advent of Christ ? These differences, of course, relate only to the mode of ad- ministration, and not to the matter of the truth revealed, nor of the grace administered. 1st. The truth was then signified by symbols, which, at the same time, were types of the real atonement for sin afterwards to be made. Now the truth is revealed in the plain gospel history. 2d. That revelation was less full as well as less clear. 3d. It was so encumbered with ceremonies as to be comparatively a carnal dispensation. The present dispensation is spiritual. 4tli. It was confined to one people. The present dispensation, disembarrassed from all na- tional organizations, embraces the whole earth. 5th. The for- mer method of administration was evidently preparatory to the present, which is final. For the Calvinistic view of the \"Covenant of Grace,\" see Turretin, \"Inst. Theo. Elench.,\" Loc. 12. ; Witsius, \"^Econ. of the Co vs.\" For Arminian view see Fletcher's works and Richard Watson's \"Inst, of Theo.\"", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "173", "sort_key": 173, "group": "Chapter XXXII", "question": "What is the Papal doctrine of Indulgences?", "answer": "The Papal doctrine of Indulgences — 1st. Rests upon the same principles with their doctrine of Penance. (1.) The distinction between the eternal and the temporal penalties demanded for the satisfactions for sins. (2.) The superabundant merit ac- quired b}' and belonging to the Head of the Church and his members (Christ, the Virgin INIary, and the saints), which con- stitute a Treasury of Merit, disposable at the discretion of com- petent authority to the relief ot any repentant believer not m mortal sin. (3.) The dispensing power of the church, whereby a church officer possessing competent jurisdiction has authority to dispense in behalf of God and of the church any or all tem- poral satisfactions due from the penitent, either on earth or in purgatory, not as yet discharged by him personally. 2d. These indulgences are to be granted for \"reasonable 494 REPENTANCE— ROMISH DOCTRINE OF PENANCE. causes,\" i. e., \"the cause must be pious, that is, not a work wliich is merely temporal, or vain, or in no respect appertain- ing to the divine glory, but any work whatsoever Avhich tends to the honor of God, or the service of the church.\" They \" do not depend for their efficacy on consideration of the work en- joined, but on the infinite treasure of the merits of Christ and the saints.\" These \"causes\" are payments of money for pious purposes, special prayers, visit to certain shrines, etc., etc. ^d. Indulgences are of various kinds. (1.) General for the whole church, granted only by the pope himself, to all the faitiiful thi'oughout the world ; or particular, granted by due authority to certain persons. (2.) They may be 'plenary., granting remis- sion from cdl temporal punishments in this world and in purga- tory; or 'partial., remitting only some part of the penalty due. (3.) They may be temporanj, for a specified number of days or months. (4.) Perpetual, without any limitation of time. ^5.) Local, attached to certain churches or other places. (6.) Real., attached to certain movable things as rosaries, medals, etc. (7.) Personal, granted to particular persons, or communities. — See M'Glintock and Strong's \" Encyclopgedia,\" and below, the \" Counc. of Trent,\" etc. AUTHOKITATIYE STATEMENTS. \"Counc. Trent,\" Sess. 14, cli. 1. — \"But the Lord tlien principally in- stituted tlie Sacrament of Penance, when being raised from the dead, he breathed upon his disciples saying, ' Receive ye the Holy Ghost, whose sins ye shall forgive, they are forgiven them, and whose sins ye retain, they are retained.' By which action so signal, and words so clear, the consent of aU the Fathers has ever understood, that the power of for - ghnnrj and retaining sins was communicated to the apostles and their lawful successors, for the reconciling of the faithful who have fallen after baptism.\" lb., eh. 3. — \"The holy synod doth furthermore teach, (1) that the FOEM of the Sacrament of Penance, wherein its force principally con- sists, is placed in those words of the minister, ' I absolve thee, etc. ' . . . . But (2) the acts of the penitent himself, to wit, contrition, confession, and satisfaction , are as it were the matter of this sacrament, which acts, inasmuch as they are, by God's institution, required in the penitent for the integrity of the sacrament, and for the full and perfect remission of sins, are for this reason called the parts of penance. But (3) the thing signified indeed, and the effect of this sacrament, as far as re- gards its force and efficacy, is reconciliation \\vith God.\" lb., eh. 'k.— \"Contrition, which holds the first place amongst the afore- said acts of the penitent, is a sorrow of mind, and a detestation for sin committed, with the purpose of not sinning for the future. \" lb., ch. 5. — \"All mortal sins of which, after a diligent examination of themselves, they are conscious, must needs be by penitents enume- rated in confession, even though those sins be most hidden, and com- mitted only against the two last precepts of the decalogue. . . Venial sins, whereby we are not excluded from the grace of God, and into which we fall more frequently, although they be rightly and larofitably and with- A UTHORITA TIVE ST A TEMENTS. 495 out presumption declared in confession, yet they may be omitted witliout guilt, and be expiated by many other remedies Other sins (mortal) which do not occur to him (the penitent) after diligent thought, are understood to be included as a whole in that same confession ; for which sins we confidently say with the prophet. ' From my secret sins cleanse me, O Lord.'\" Ih., ch. 6. — \"It also teaches, that even priests, who are in mortal sin, exercise through the virtue of the Holy Ghost, which God has bestowed in ordination, the office of forgiving sins. . . . But although the absolution of the priest is the disjjensation of another's bounty, yet it is not a bare ministry only, or declarative act, but of the nature of a judicial act, whereby sentence is pronounced by the priest as by a judge. . . Neither would faith without penance bestow any remission of sins; nor would he be otherwise than most careless of his own salvation, who knowing that a priest but absolved him in jest, should not carefully seek for another who would act in earnest.\" lb., ch. 8. — \"Finally, as regards Satisfaction, which as it is, of all the parts of Penance, that which has been at all times recommended to the Christian people by our Fathers. Ch. 9. — We are able through Jesus Christ to make satisfaction to God the Father, not only by pains volun- tarily undertaken by ourselves for the punishment of sin, or by those imposed at the discretion of the priest according to the measure of our delinquency,— but also, which is a very great proof of love, by the tem- poral scourges inflicted of God and borne patiently by us. \" \"Counc. Trent,\" Sess. 6, Can. 29. — \"If any one saith, that he, who has fallen after baptism, is not able by the grace of God to rise again ; or that he is able indeed to recover the justice which he has lost, but by faith alone without the sacrament of penance Let him be accursed. Can. 30. — If any one saith that after the grace of Justifi- cation (sanctification) has been received, to every penitent sinner the guilt is remitted, and the debt of eternal punishment is blotted out in such wise, that there remains not any debt of temporal punishment to be discharged either in this world, or in the next in Purgatory, before entrance to the kingdom of heaven can be opened (to him); Let him be accursed.\" Inditlgences. — \"Cone. 7Ve?i<,\" Sess. 25, \"De Indulgentiis.\" Pope Leo X., \"Brill De Indulgentiis\" (1518). — \"That no one in future may allege ignorance of the doctrine of the Eoman Church respecting indulgences and their efficacy . . . the Roman pontifi\", vicar of Christ on earth, can, for reasonable causes, by the powers of the keys, grant to the faithful, whether in this life or in Purgatory, indulgences, out of the superabundance of the merits of Christ, and of the saints (expressly called a treasure) ; and that those who have truly obtained those indul- gences are released from so much of the temporal punishment due for their actual sins to the divine justice as is equivalent to the indulgence granted and obtained.\"", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "174", "sort_key": 174, "group": "Chapter XXXIII", "question": "Eoio can James ii. 14-26, he reconciled with this doctrine?", "answer": "James is not speaking of the meritorious ground of justifi- cation, but of the relation which good works sustain to a gen- 500 JUSTIFICATION. nine faith as its fruit and evidence. The meritorious ground of justification is the righteousness of Christ. — Eom. x. 4; 1 Cor. i. 30. Faith is the essential prerequisite and instrument of receiving that righteousness. — Eph. ii. 8. James, in the jDassage cited, simply declares and argues the truth that the faith which is thus the instrumental cause of justification, is never a dead, but always a living and fruitful principle. Paul teaches the same truth often, \" Faith works by love,\" Gal. V. 6, and \"love is the fulfilling of the law,\" Eom. xiii. 10. 12. Wliai do the Scriptures declare to he the true and only ground of justification ? Justification is a declaration on the part of the infinitely wise and holy God that the law is satisfied. The law is, like its Author, absolutely unchangeable, and can be satisfied by nothing else than an absolutely perfect righteousness, at once fulfilling the precept, and suffering the penalty. This was rendered by Christ as our representative, and his perfect right- eousness, as imputed to us, is the sole and strictly legal ground of our justification. Thus he is made for us the end of the law for righteousness, and we are made the righteousness of God in him. — Rom. iii. 24; v. 9, 19; viii. 1; x. 4; 1 Cor. i. 30; vi. 11; 2 Cor. v. 21; Phil. iii. 9. 13. How can it he 'proved that Christ's active ohedience to the precepts of the law is included in that righteotisness hy ivkich ive are justified? 1st. The condition of the covenant of works was perfect obedience. This covenant having failed in the hands of the first Adam must be fulfilled in the hands of the second Adam, since in the covenant of grace Christ assumed all of the undis- charged obligations of his people under the covenant of works. His suffering discharges the penalty, but only his active obe- dience fulfills the condition. 2d. All the promises of salvation are attached to obedience, not to suffering. — Matt. xix. 16, 17; Gal. iii. 12. 3d. Christ came to fulfil the whole law. — Is. xlii. 21; Rom. iii. 31 ; 1 Cor. i. 30. 4th. The obedience of Christ is expressly contrasted with the disobedience of Adam. — Rom. v. 19.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "175", "sort_key": 175, "group": "Chapter XXXIII", "question": "Hoiv may it he shown that Christ^ s ohedience was free?", "answer": "Although Christ was made under the law by being born of the woman, and rendered obedience to that law in the exercises of his created human nature, yet he did not owe that obedience IMPUTATION OF CHRIST'S RIGHTEOUSNESS. 501 for himself, but rendered it freely that its merits might be im- puted to his people, because the claims of law terminate not upon nature, but upon persons; and he was always a divine person. As he suffered, the just for the unjust, so he obeyed, the Lawgiver in the place of the law-subject.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} -{"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "176", "sort_key": 176, "group": "Chapter XXXIII", "question": "In wliat sense is Christ's righteousness imputed to believers?", "answer": "Imputation is an act of God as sovereign judge, at once ju- dicial and sovereign, whereby (1) he makes the guilt and legal responsibilities of our sins really Christ's, and punishes him for them. \" He was wounded for our transgression, the punishment of our peace was upon him.\" — Is. liii. 5 and 11. \"Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us.\" — Gal. iii. 13. \"For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin, that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.\"— 2 Cor. v. 21; John i. 29. (2.) He makes the righteousness of Christ ours (that is, the legal right to reward, by the gracious covenant conditioned on righteousness), and then treats us as persons legally invested with those rights. \" Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man to whom the Lord imputeth righteousness without works.\" — Rom. iv. 6. \" For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everj' one that believeth.\" — Rom. x. 4; 1 Cor. i. 30; 2 Cor. v. 21; Phil. iii. 9. \" Imputation \" is the charging or crediting to one's account as the ground of judicial treatment. \" Guilt \" is the just obligation to punishment. The reatus pcence, or \"guilt of punishment,\" is imputed to Christ in our stead. The reatus culpce, or guilt of fault, remains ours. \"Righteousness imputed\" is the vicarious fulfillment of all the covenant demands on which eternal life is conditioned. \" Merit \" is that which deserves on the ground of covenant promise a reward. The merit of reward is imputed to us from Christ, the merit of praise worthiness remains his forever. As Christ is not made a sinner by the imputation to him of our sins, so we are not made holy by the imputation to us of his righteousness. The transfer is only of guilt from us to him, and of merit from him to us. He justly suffered the punish- ment due to our sins, and we justly receive the rewards due to his righteousness. — 1 John i. 9. For explanation of \" Imputa- tion,\" see above. Chap. XXL, Ques. 12, and Chap. XXV., Ques. 9. 16. Upon what ground does this imputation proceed? && Upon the union federal, spiritual, and vital, which subsists between Christ and his people. Which union, in turn, rests upon the eternal decree of election common to all the persons 502 j^rS T I PICA TION. of the Godhead, and upon the eternal covenant of grace formed between the Father as God absolute and the Son as Mediator. Thus the ultimate ground of imputation is the eternal nature and imperial will of God, the fountain of all law and all right. 17. How may the fact of this imputation he proved from Scripture ? See Rom. v. 12-21. Compare Rom. iv. 6; iii. 21, with Rom. V. 19. The doctrine of imputation is essentially involved in the doctrine of substitution. If Christ obeyed and suffered in our place it can only be because our sins were imputed to him, Avhich is directly asserted in Scripture, Isa. liii. 6; 2 Cor. v. 21; 1 Pet. ii. 24; and, if so, the merit of that obedience and suffer- ing must accrue to us, Matt. xx. 28; 1 Tim. ii. 6; 1 Pet. iii. 18. See above, Chapter XXL, Question 12. This doctrine is also taught by those passages which affirm that Christ fulfilled the law, Rom. iii. 31; x. 4; and by those which assert that we are justified by the righteousness of Christ, 1 Cor. vi. 11; Rom. viii. 1, etc. This doctrine, moreover, stands or falls with the whole view we have presented of the priesthood of Christ, of the justice of God, of the covenants of Avorks and of grace, and of the nature of the atonement; to which subjects, under their respective heads, the reader is referred. 18. What are the two effects ascribed to the imputation of Christ's righteousness 7 Christ's righteousness satisfies, 1st, the penalty of the law; 2d, then the positive conditions of the covenant of works, i. e., obedience to the precepts of the law. The imputation of that righteousness to the believer, therefore, secures, 1st, the remis- sion of the penalty, pardon of sins; 2d, the recognition and treatment of the believer as one with respect to whom the covenant is fulfilled, and to whom all its promises and advan- tages legally accrue. — See below, Question 28. 19. Are the sins of believers, committed siihseqiiently to their justification, included in the pardon ivhich is consequent to the im- putation of Christ's 7'ighteousness ; and, if so, in ivhat icay ? The elect, although embraced in the purpose of God, and in his covenant with his Son from eternity, are not effectively united to Christ until the time of their regeneration, when, in consequence of their union with him, and the imputation of his righteousness to them, their relation to the law is permanently changed. Although the immutable law always continues their RELATION OF FAITH TO JUSTIFICATION. 503 perfect standard of experience and of action, it is no longer to them a condition of the covenant of life, because that covenant has been fully discharged for them by their sponsor. God no longer imputes sin to them to the end of judicial punishment. Every suffering which they henceforth endure is of the nature of chastisement, designed for their correction and improve- ment, and forms, in its relation to them, no part of the penalty of the law. 20. What are the dlff^erent opinions as to the class of si7is which are forgiven when the sinner is justified? Romanists teach that original sin and all actual transgres- sions prior to baptism are forgiven for Christ's sake, through the reception of that sacrament, and that after baptism, sins, as they are committed, are through the merits of Christ for- given in the observance of the sacrament of penance. See above. Chapter XXXII., Question 11. Dr. Pusey has revived an ancient doctrine that in baptism all past sins, original and actual, are forgiven; but his system makes no provision for sins subsequently committed. ]\\Iany Protestants have held that only past and present sins are forgiven in the first act of justification, and that sins after regeneration, as they occur, are forgiven upon renewed acts of faith. The true view, however, is, that in consequence of the imputation to him of Christ's righteousness, the believer is emancipated from his former federal relation to the law, and consequently henceforth no sin is charged to him to the end of judicial condemnation. This follows from the nature of justifi- cation, as stated above, and it is illustrated by the recorded experience of Paul, who, while complaining of the law of sin, still warring in his members, yet never doubted of his filial relation to God, nor of the forgiveness of his sins. 21. What are the different opinions as to the relation hetiveen faith and justification ? Socinians hold that faith, including obedience, is the proper meritorious ground of justification. — \" Cat. Rac.,\"\" Quest. 418-421, and 453. Arminians teach that although faith has no merit in itself, since it is the gift of God, yet, as a living principle, including evangelical obedience, it is graciously, for Christ's merits' sake, imputed to us for righteousness, i. e., accepted as righteousness, upon the ground of which we are declared just. — Limborch, \"Theol. Christ.,\" 6,_ 4, 22, and 6, 4, 46. The orthodox view is that the active and passive obedience 504 JUSTIFICA TIOiV. of Christ satisfying botli the precept and penalty of the law as a covenant of life, and thus constituting' a perfect righteousness, is, upon being appropriated by the believer in the act of faith, actually made his, in a legal sense, by imputation. Faith, there- fore, is the mere instrument whereby we partake in the right- eousness of Christ, which is the true ground of our justification, \"V 22. Prove from Scripture that faith is only the instrumental cause of justification. 1st. From the nature of faith itself (1.) It is not of our- selves, it is the gift of God. — Eph. ii. 8; Phil. i. 29. (2.) It is one of the fruits of the Spirit, and, therefore, not the meritorious ground of spiritual blessings. — Gal. v. 22. (3.) It is an act of the sold, and therefore a work, but though, by means of faith, justification is not by works. — Rom. iv. 2-5; xi. 6. (4.) Justi- fying faith terminates on or in Christ, in his blood and sacrifice, and in the promises of God; in its very essence, therefore, it involves trust, and, denying its owr justifying value, affirms the sole merit of that on which it trusts. — Rom. iii. 25, 26; iv. 20, 22; Gal. iii. 26; Eph. i. 12, 13; 1 John v. 10. (5.) The law necessarily demands a perfect righteousness, but faith, even when combined with the evangelical obedience which springs from it, is not a perfect righteousness. 2d. The Scriptures, when referring to the relation of justifi- cation to faith, use the terms £k nidrEooi, hy faith, and 8id Tti6Tf.ooz, by or through faitli, but never 8id Tci6riv, on account of faith, Gal. ii. 16. 3d. Faith is distinguished fi'om the righteousness which it apprehends. — Rom i. 17; Phil. iii. 8-11. Turretin, L. 16, Q. 7.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "176", "sort_key": 176, "group": "Chapter XXXIII", "question": "In wliat sense is Christ's righteousness imputed to believers?", "answer": "Imputation is an act of God as sovereign judge, at once ju- dicial and sovereign, whereby (1) he makes the guilt and legal responsibilities of our sins really Christ's, and punishes him for them. \" He was wounded for our transgression, the punishment of our peace was upon him.\" — Is. liii. 5 and 11. \"Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us.\" — Gal. iii. 13. \"For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin, that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.\"— 2 Cor. v. 21; John i. 29. (2.) He makes the righteousness of Christ ours (that is, the legal right to reward, by the gracious covenant conditioned on righteousness), and then treats us as persons legally invested with those rights. \" Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man to whom the Lord imputeth righteousness without works.\" — Rom. iv. 6. \" For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everj' one that believeth.\" — Rom. x. 4; 1 Cor. i. 30; 2 Cor. v. 21; Phil. iii. 9. \" Imputation \" is the charging or crediting to one's account as the ground of judicial treatment. \" Guilt \" is the just obligation to punishment. The reatus pcence, or \"guilt of punishment,\" is imputed to Christ in our stead. The reatus culpce, or guilt of fault, remains ours. \"Righteousness imputed\" is the vicarious fulfillment of all the covenant demands on which eternal life is conditioned. \" Merit \" is that which deserves on the ground of covenant promise a reward. The merit of reward is imputed to us from Christ, the merit of praise worthiness remains his forever. As Christ is not made a sinner by the imputation to him of our sins, so we are not made holy by the imputation to us of his righteousness. The transfer is only of guilt from us to him, and of merit from him to us. He justly suffered the punish- ment due to our sins, and we justly receive the rewards due to his righteousness. — 1 John i. 9. For explanation of \" Imputa- tion,\" see above. Chap. XXL, Ques. 12, and Chap. XXV., Ques. 9. 16. Upon what ground does this imputation proceed? && Upon the union federal, spiritual, and vital, which subsists between Christ and his people. Which union, in turn, rests upon the eternal decree of election common to all the persons 502 j^rS T I PICA TION. of the Godhead, and upon the eternal covenant of grace formed between the Father as God absolute and the Son as Mediator. Thus the ultimate ground of imputation is the eternal nature and imperial will of God, the fountain of all law and all right. 17. How may the fact of this imputation he proved from Scripture ? See Rom. v. 12-21. Compare Rom. iv. 6; iii. 21, with Rom. V. 19. The doctrine of imputation is essentially involved in the doctrine of substitution. If Christ obeyed and suffered in our place it can only be because our sins were imputed to him, Avhich is directly asserted in Scripture, Isa. liii. 6; 2 Cor. v. 21; 1 Pet. ii. 24; and, if so, the merit of that obedience and suffer- ing must accrue to us, Matt. xx. 28; 1 Tim. ii. 6; 1 Pet. iii. 18. See above, Chapter XXL, Question 12. This doctrine is also taught by those passages which affirm that Christ fulfilled the law, Rom. iii. 31; x. 4; and by those which assert that we are justified by the righteousness of Christ, 1 Cor. vi. 11; Rom. viii. 1, etc. This doctrine, moreover, stands or falls with the whole view we have presented of the priesthood of Christ, of the justice of God, of the covenants of Avorks and of grace, and of the nature of the atonement; to which subjects, under their respective heads, the reader is referred. 18. What are the two effects ascribed to the imputation of Christ's righteousness 7 Christ's righteousness satisfies, 1st, the penalty of the law; 2d, then the positive conditions of the covenant of works, i. e., obedience to the precepts of the law. The imputation of that righteousness to the believer, therefore, secures, 1st, the remis- sion of the penalty, pardon of sins; 2d, the recognition and treatment of the believer as one with respect to whom the covenant is fulfilled, and to whom all its promises and advan- tages legally accrue. — See below, Question 28. 19. Are the sins of believers, committed siihseqiiently to their justification, included in the pardon ivhich is consequent to the im- putation of Christ's 7'ighteousness ; and, if so, in ivhat icay ? The elect, although embraced in the purpose of God, and in his covenant with his Son from eternity, are not effectively united to Christ until the time of their regeneration, when, in consequence of their union with him, and the imputation of his righteousness to them, their relation to the law is permanently changed. Although the immutable law always continues their RELATION OF FAITH TO JUSTIFICATION. 503 perfect standard of experience and of action, it is no longer to them a condition of the covenant of life, because that covenant has been fully discharged for them by their sponsor. God no longer imputes sin to them to the end of judicial punishment. Every suffering which they henceforth endure is of the nature of chastisement, designed for their correction and improve- ment, and forms, in its relation to them, no part of the penalty of the law. 20. What are the dlff^erent opinions as to the class of si7is which are forgiven when the sinner is justified? Romanists teach that original sin and all actual transgres- sions prior to baptism are forgiven for Christ's sake, through the reception of that sacrament, and that after baptism, sins, as they are committed, are through the merits of Christ for- given in the observance of the sacrament of penance. See above. Chapter XXXII., Question 11. Dr. Pusey has revived an ancient doctrine that in baptism all past sins, original and actual, are forgiven; but his system makes no provision for sins subsequently committed. ]\\Iany Protestants have held that only past and present sins are forgiven in the first act of justification, and that sins after regeneration, as they occur, are forgiven upon renewed acts of faith. The true view, however, is, that in consequence of the imputation to him of Christ's righteousness, the believer is emancipated from his former federal relation to the law, and consequently henceforth no sin is charged to him to the end of judicial condemnation. This follows from the nature of justifi- cation, as stated above, and it is illustrated by the recorded experience of Paul, who, while complaining of the law of sin, still warring in his members, yet never doubted of his filial relation to God, nor of the forgiveness of his sins. 21. What are the different opinions as to the relation hetiveen faith and justification ? Socinians hold that faith, including obedience, is the proper meritorious ground of justification. — \" Cat. Rac.,\"\" Quest. 418-421, and 453. Arminians teach that although faith has no merit in itself, since it is the gift of God, yet, as a living principle, including evangelical obedience, it is graciously, for Christ's merits' sake, imputed to us for righteousness, i. e., accepted as righteousness, upon the ground of which we are declared just. — Limborch, \"Theol. Christ.,\" 6, 4, 22, and 6, 4, 46. The orthodox view is that the active and passive obedience 504 JUSTIFICA TIOiV. of Christ satisfying botli the precept and penalty of the law as a covenant of life, and thus constituting' a perfect righteousness, is, upon being appropriated by the believer in the act of faith, actually made his, in a legal sense, by imputation. Faith, there- fore, is the mere instrument whereby we partake in the right- eousness of Christ, which is the true ground of our justification, \"V 22. Prove from Scripture that faith is only the instrumental cause of justification. 1st. From the nature of faith itself (1.) It is not of our- selves, it is the gift of God. — Eph. ii. 8; Phil. i. 29. (2.) It is one of the fruits of the Spirit, and, therefore, not the meritorious ground of spiritual blessings. — Gal. v. 22. (3.) It is an act of the sold, and therefore a work, but though, by means of faith, justification is not by works. — Rom. iv. 2-5; xi. 6. (4.) Justi- fying faith terminates on or in Christ, in his blood and sacrifice, and in the promises of God; in its very essence, therefore, it involves trust, and, denying its owr justifying value, affirms the sole merit of that on which it trusts. — Rom. iii. 25, 26; iv. 20, 22; Gal. iii. 26; Eph. i. 12, 13; 1 John v. 10. (5.) The law necessarily demands a perfect righteousness, but faith, even when combined with the evangelical obedience which springs from it, is not a perfect righteousness. 2d. The Scriptures, when referring to the relation of justifi- cation to faith, use the terms £k nidrEooi, hy faith, and 8id Tti6Tf.ooz, by or through faitli, but never 8id Tci6riv, on account of faith, Gal. ii. 16. 3d. Faith is distinguished fi'om the righteousness which it apprehends. — Rom i. 17; Phil. iii. 8-11. Turretin, L. 16, Q. 7.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "177", "sort_key": 177, "group": "Chapter XXXIII", "question": "What is the specific object of justifying faith ?", "answer": "The Socinians, denying the divinity of Christ, make the act of justifying faith to terminate \"in God through Christ.\" — \"Rac. Cat.,\" Sec. 5., Ch. 9. The Romanists, confounding justification and sanctification, make the whole revelation of God the object of the faith that justifies. — \"Cat. Rom.\" Part 1, Chap. 1. The Scriptural doctrine is, that while the renewed heart believes equally ever}?- ascertained word of God, the specific act of faith, whereby we are justified, terminates upon the person and work of Cln-ist as Mediator. This is proved, 1st, from express declarations of Scripture. Rom. iii. 22, 25; Gal. ii. 16; Phil. iii. 9. 2d. By the declara- tion that we are saved by believing in him. — Acts x. 43; xvi. 31; John iii. 16, 36. 3d. By those figurative expressions which illustrate the act of saving faith as \"looking to Christ,\" OBJECTIONS ANSWERED. 505 etc.— Is. xlv. 22 ; John i. 12 ; vi. 35, 37 ; jSIatt. xi. 28. 4th. Unbe. lief is the refusing the righteousness which God provides, i. e., Christ. — Ptom. x. 3, 4 24. What is the nature of that peace lohich fioivs from justifi- cation ? 1st. Peace with God, his justice being completely satisfied through the righteousness of Christ. — Kom. v. 1 ; 2 Cor. v. 19 ; Col. i. 21 ; Eph. ii. 14. In witness whereof his Holy Spirit is given to us. — Rom. viii. 15, 16; Heb. x. 15, 17. His love shed abroad in our hearts, Rom. v. 5, and our habitual fellowship with him established, 1 John i. 3. 2d. Inward peace of con- science, including consciousness of our reconciliation with God through the operation of his Spirit, as above, and the appease- ment of our self-condemning conscience through the apprehen- sion of the righteousness by which we are justified. — Heb. ix. 14; X. 2, 22.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "178", "sort_key": 178, "group": "Chapter XXXIII", "question": "What other l^nefitSfioio from justification?", "answer": "Being justified on the ground of a perfect righteousness, our whole relation to God and the law is changed; the gift of the Holy Gliost, adoption, sanctification, perseverance, the working orall things together for good in this life, deliverance in death, the resurrection of the body, and the final glorification, all result. 0 Objections Answered. 26. State and Refute the principal objections made to the Protestant doctrine of justification. 1st. That it is legal, and therefore excludes grace. We ANSWER — that it is transcendently gracious. 1. The admission of a substitute for guilty sinners was an act of grace. 2. The vicarious obedience and sufferings of the God-man were of infinite grace. 3. The imputation of his righteousness to an individual elected out of the mass of fallen humanity is an act of pure grace. Hence, 4, the entire subsequent regarding and treating the believer as righteous, is a work of grace. 2d. That it is impious because it declares the sinner to be righteous with the very righteousness of Christ. We ANSWER. It is not impious because — 1. This righteous- ness was freely wrought out with the intention it should be ours, and it is freely given to us. 2. It is not Christ's per- sonal subjective I'ighteousness which is incommunicable, but his vicarious fulfillment of the covenant of life under which we were created which is imputed to us. 3. The merit of praise- 506 JUSTIFICATION. worthiness is retained by Christ, only its merit of rewardable- ness is given to us. 4. It is given to us gratuitously, that the praise of glorious grace may redound to Christ alone. 3d. That gratuitous justification by faith leads to licen- tiousness. Paul answers, Rom. vi. 2-7: Prop. 1st. Where sin abounded grace did much more abound. Rom. V. 20. Prop. 2d. Shall we conclude, therefore, that we are to con- tinue in sin that grace may abound? God forbid. — Rom. vi. 1, 2. Prop. 3d. The federal union of the believer with Christ, which secures our justification, is the foundation of, and is insepara- ble from, that vital spiritual union with him, which secures our sanctification. Prop. 4th. This method of justification, so far from leading to licentiousness, secures the only conditions under which we could be holy. (1.) This method of justification, by changing our relation to God, enables us to return to him in a way of a free, loving service. — Rom. vi. 14; vii. 1-6. (2.) It alone de- livers us from the spirit of bondage and fear, and gives us that of adoption and love. — Rom. viii. 1-17; xiii. 10; Gal. v. 6; 1 John iv. 18; 2 John 6. 27. In ivlmt respect did the doctrine of Piscator on this subject differ from that ^^ the Reformed Churches? Piscator, a Protestant divine. Prof at Herborn (1584-1625), taught, 1st, that, as to his human nature, Christ was under the law in the same sense as any other creature, and that, therefore, he could only obey the law for himself; 2d, that if Christ had obeyed the law in our place, the law could not claim a second fulfillment of us, and, consequently. Christians would be under no obligations to obey the law of God; 3d, that if Christ had both obeyed the precept of the law and suffered its penalty, then the law would have been doubly fulfilled, since the claims of the precept and the penalty of the law are alternative, not coincident. This doctrine was expressly condemned in the Reformed Churches of Switzerland and Holland, and by the French synods held in the years 1603, 1612, and 1614. \\\\\\ 1615, how- ever, the Synod tacitly allowed these views to pass without condemnation. — Mosheim's \" Hist.\"", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "179", "sort_key": 179, "group": "Chapter XXXIII", "question": "Hoio may it he shown that justification is not mere pardon?", "answer": "Piscator erred, from tailing to distinguish — 1st. That the claims of law terminate not upon natures, but upon persons. Christ Avas a divine person, and, therefore, his obedience was OBJECTIONS ANSWERED. 507 free. 2d. That there is an evident difference between a federal relation to the law as a condition of salvation, and a natural relation to law as a rule of life. Christ discharged the former as our federal representative. The latter necessarily attaches to the believer as to all moral agents forever. Justification is more than pardon — 1st. Because the very word \"to justify\" proves it. To \"pardon\" is, in the exercise of sovereign prerogative, to waive the execution of the penal sanc- tions of the law. \"To justify\" is to declare that the demands of the law are satisfied, not wai^^ed. Pardon is a sovereign act — -justification is a judicial act. 2d. As we proved under Chap. XXV., Christ did in strict rigor of justice satisfy vicariously for us the demands of the law, both the obedience demanded and the , ' ' penalty denounced. His satisfaction is the ground of our justi- .' cation. But pardon is remission of penalty in absence of satis- I ,, ' •' faction. 3d. iF Justification were mere pardon it would simply » ''\"'^ release us from penal suffering, but would provide no further good for us. But \"justification through faith in Christ,\" se- cures not pardon only, but also peace, grace, reconciliation, adoption of sons, coheirship, etc., etc. — See above, Ques. 13. Kom. V. 1-10; Acts xxvi. 18; Rev. i. 5, 6. In the case of justified believers \"justification \" includes \"par- don.\" Our justification proceeds on the ground of a \"satisfac- tion,\" and, therefoi-e, is not mere pardon. But it is a \" vicari- ous \" satisfaction graciously set to the credit of the unworthy, and, therefore, it effects pardon to us sinners who believe in Christ. 29. Did not Calvin often use language to the effect that justifica- tion and pardon are the same ? He did. But his language is to be interpreted — 1st. By the fact that he was arguing with Eomanists who taught that \"jus- tification consists in remission of sins and infusion of grace.\" He argued in opposition that justification consists in the former but does not include the latter. 2d. By the conclusive fact that his full definitions of justification comprehend the full truth more accurately defined in the Symbols of the Lutheran and Reformed Churches. Calvin's '^Institutes,\" Bk. 3, ch. 11, ^ 2. — \"A man is said to be justi- fied in tlie sight of God, when in the judgment of God he is decreed righteous, and is accej)ted on account of his righteousness. ... In the same manner a man will be said to he justified by loorTcs, if in his hfe, or by the perfection of his works, he can answer and satisfy the divine justice. On the contrary a man will be justified by faith, when exchided from the righteousness of works, he by faith lays hold of the righteous- ness of Christ, and clothed in it appears in the sight of God not as sinner, 508 JUSTIFICATION. bvit as rigliteoiis. Thus we simply interpret justification, as tlie accept- ance with which God receives us into his favor as if we were righteous, and we say that this justification consists in the forgiveness of sins, and the imputation of the righteousness of Christ.\" Calvin's ^'Cuni.,\" 1 Cor. i. 30. — \" 'Christ is made unto us righteoiis- ness,' by which, he (the apostle) understood that we are accepted by God in his name (Christ's), because he expiated our sins, and his obedience is imputed to us for righteousness. For since the righteousness of faith consists in remission of sins, and in gratuitous accej)tance, we obtain both through Christ.\" 30. In ivliat respect does the governmental tlieory of the atone- ment modify the doctrine of justification ? See above, Chap. XXV., Question 27. 1st. It follows, from that theory, that justification is a sov- ereign, not a judicial act of God. Christ has not satisfied the law, but merely made it consistent with the government of God to set aside the law in the case of believing men. It is mere pardon, an act of executive clemency. 2d. As Christ did not die as a substitute, it follows that his righteousness is not imputed ; it is the occasion, not the ground of justification. 3d. As Christ did not die as a substitute, there is no strictly federal union between Christ and his people, and faith can not be the instrument of salvation by being the means of uniting us to Christ, but only the arbitrary condition of justification, or the means of recommending us to God. 4th. As justification is mere pardon, it only sets aside con- demnation, and renders, so far forth, future salvation possible. It does nothing to secvire the future standing and relations of the believer, under the covenant of salvation, to God. Dr. Emmons (1745-1840), one of the ablest theologians of the New England School, says (\"Sermons,\" Vol. III., p. 3-67) — (1.) \"Justification, in a gospel sense, signifies no more nor less than pardon or remission of sin.\" (2.) \"Forgiveness is the only favor which God bestows upon men on Christ's account.\" (3.) \"The fidl and final justification of believers, or their title to their eternal inheritance, is conditional. They must perform certaiji things, which he has specified as terms or conditions of their taking possession of their several legacies.\" (4.) \"God does promise eternal life to all who obey his commands or exercise those holy and benevolent afi'ections which his com- mands require.\" 31. How does the Armiman theory as to the nature and design of the scdisf action of Christ modify the doctrine of justification ? They hold — 1st. As to the nature of Christ's satisfaction, THE ARMINIAN, AND THE ROMISH DOCTRINE. 509 that although it was a real propitiation rendered to justice for us, it was not in the rigor of justice perfect, but was gra- ciously accepted and acted on as such by God. — Limborch, \"Apol. Theo.,\" 3, 22, 5. 2d. That it was not strictly the sub- stitution of Christ in place of his elect, but rather that he suf- fered the wrath of God in behalf of all men, in order to make it consistent with justice for God to offer salvation to all men upon condition of faith. Therefore they regard justification as a sovereign, not a judicial act — 1st. In accepting the sufferings of Christ as suf- ficient to enable God consistently to offer to men salvation on the terms of the new covenant of grace, %. e., on the condition of faith. 2d. In imputing to the believer his faith for right- eousness for Christ's sake. This faith they make — 1st. To include evangelical obedi- ence, i. e., the whole principle of religion in heart and life. 2d. They regard it as the graciously admitted ground, rather than the mere instrument of justification ; faith being counted for righteousness, because Christ died. — Limborch, \"Theo. Christ,\" 6, 4, \"i.l, and 6, 4, 46. This theory, besides being opposed by all the arguments we have above presented in establishing the orthodox doctrine, labors under the further objections — 1st. It fails to render a clear account as to how the satis- faction of Christ makes it consistent with divine justice to save men upon the condition of faith. If Christ did not obey and suffer strictly as the substitute of his people, it is difficult to see how the justice of God, as it respects them, could have been appeased ; and if he did so fulfil the demands of justice in their place, then the orthodox view, as above stated, is admitted. 2d. It fails to render a clear account of the relation of faith .to justification — (1.) Because faith in Christ, including trust, necessarily implies that the merits of Christ upon which the trust terminates is the ground of justification. (2.) Faith must be either the ground or the mere instrument of justification. If it be the latter then the righteousness of Christ, which is the object of faith, is that ground. If it be the former, then what is made of the merits of Christ upon which faith rests?", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "186", "sort_key": 186, "group": "Chapter XXXV", "question": "What, in general terms, is perfectionism ?", "answer": "The various theories of perfectionism all agree in maintain- ing that it is possible for a child of God in this world to become, 1st, perfectly free from sin, 2d, conformed to the law under which they now live. They differ very variously among them- selves, however, 1st, as to what sin is; 2d, as to what law we are now obliged to fulfil; 3d, as to the means whereby this perfection may be attained, whether by nature or by grace. 24. Hoiv does the Pelagian theory of the nature of man and of grace lead to perfectionism ? Pelagians maintain, 1st, as to man's nature, that it was not radically corrupted by the fall, and that every man possesses sufficient power to fulfil all the duties required of him, since God can not in justice demand that which man has not full power to do. 2d. As to God's grace, that it is nothing more than the favorable constitution of our own minds, and the in- fluence exerted on them by the truth he has revealed to us, and the propitious circumstances in which he has placed us. Thus in the Christian church, and with the Christian revelation, men are, in fact, placed in the most propitious circumstances possible to persuade them to perform their duties. It follows from this system directly that every one who wishes may certainly attain perfection by using his natural powers and advantages of posi- tion with sufficient care. — \" Wigger's Historical View of Augus- tinianism and Pelagianism.\" 25. What, according to the Pelagian theory, is tJie nature of the sin from lohich man may be perfectly free; what the laiv luhich he may perfectly fulfil, and ivhat are the means by ivhich this per- fection may be attained? They deny original and inherent corruption of nature, and hold that sin is only voluntary transgression of known law, from which any man may abstain if he will. As to the la.w which man in his present state may perfectly fulfil, they hold that it is the single and original law of God, the requirements of which, however, in the case of every indi- 34 530 -S\"--^ NC T I PICA TIOJV. vicinal subject, are measured by the individual's ability, and opportunities of\" knowledge. As to the means whereby this perfection may be attained, they maintain the plenary ability of man's nattu'al will to discharge all the obligations resting upon him, and they admit the assistance of God's grace only in the sense of the influence of the truth, and other propitious circumstances in persuading man to use his own power. Thus the means of perfect sanctitication are, 1st, man's own volition, 2d, as helped by the study of the Bible, prudent avoidance of temptation, etc.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "187", "sort_key": 187, "group": "Chapter XXXV", "question": "In what sense do Romanists hold the doctrine of perfection?", "answer": "The decisions of the Council of Trent upon the subject, as upon all critical points, are studiously ambiguous. They lay down the principle that the law must be possible to them iipon whom it is binding, since God does not command impossibili- ties. Men justified (sanctified) may by the grace of God dwell- ing in them satisfy the divine law, pro htijus vitce statu, i. e., as graciously for Christ's sake adjusted to our present capacities. They confess, nevertheless, that the just may fall into venial sins every day, and that while in the flesh no man can live entirely without sin (unless by a special privilege of God); yet that in this life the renewecl can fully keep the divine law; and even by the observance of the evangelical counsels do more than is commanded; and thus, as many saints have actually done, lay up a fund of supererogatory merit. — \"Council of Trent,\" Session vi. Compare Chap. xi. and xvi., and Canons 18, 23, and 32. See above. Question 14. 27. In lohat sense do they hold that the reneived may, in this life live loithout sin ; in ivhat sense fully satisfy the law ; and by the use of ivhat means do they teach that this perfection may he attained ? As to sin, they hold the distinction between mortal and venial sins, and that the concupiscence that remains in the bosom of the renewed, as the result of original and the fuel of actual sin, is not itself sin, since sin consists only in the consent of the will to the impulse of concupiscence. In accordance with these views they hold that a Christian in this life may live Avithout committing mortal sins, but that he never can be free from the inward movements of concupiscence, nor from liability to fall through ignorance, inattention, or passion, into venial sins. As to the lav), which a believer in this life may fully satisfy, they hold that as God is just and can not demand of us what PERFECTIONISM: AKMINIAN VIEW. 531 is impossible, his law is gvacionsly adjusted to our present ca- pacities, as assisted by grace, and that it is this law i^ro liujus vitce statu, which we may fulfil. As to the means whereby this perfection may be attained, they hold that divine grace precedes, accompanies, and follows all of our good works, which divine grace is to be sought through those sacramental and priestly channels which Christ has instituted in his church, and especially in the observance of works of prayer, fasting, and alms deeds, and the acquisition of supererogatory merit by the fulfilment of the counsels of Christ to chastity, obedience, and voluntary poverty. — \"Council of Trent,\" Sess. xiv.. Chapter v., Sess. vi.. Chapters xi. and xii., Sess. v., Canon 5; \"Cat. Rom.,\" Part II., Chapter ii.. Question 32, and Part II., Chapter v., Question 59, and Part III., Chapter X., Questions 5-10. 28. In ivhat form loas the doctrine taught hy the early Ar- minians ? Arminius declared that his mind was in suspense upon this subject (\"Writings of Arminius,\" translated by Nichols, Vol. I., p. 256). His immediate successors in the theological leadership of the remonstrant party, developed a theory of perfectionism apparently identical with that taught by Wesley, and professed by his disciples. \"A man can, with the assistance of divine grace, keep all the commandments of God perfectly, according to the gospel or covenant of grace. The highest evangelical perfection (for we are not teaching a legal perfection, which includes sinlessness entire in all respects and in the highest degree, and excludes all imperfection and infirmity, for this we believe to be impossible), embraces two things, 1st, a per- fection proportioned to the powers of each individual; 2d, a desire of making continual progress and increasing one's strength more and more.\" — Episcopius, quoted by Dr. G. Peck, \"Christian Perfection,\" pp. 135 and 136.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "188", "sort_key": 188, "group": "Chapter XXXV", "question": "What is the Wesleyan doctrine on this subject ?", "answer": "1st. That although every believer as soon as he is justified is regenerated, and commences the incipient stages of sanctifi- cation, yet this does not exclude the remains of much inherent sin, nor the warfare of the flesh against the Spirit, which may continue for a long time, but which must cease at some time before the subject can be fit for heaven. 2d. This state of progressive sanctification is not itself per- fection, which is properly designated by the phrases \" entire,\" or \"perfect santification.\" This, sooner or later, every heir of glory must experience; although the majority do not reach it 532 SANCTIFICA TION. long before death, it is the attainment of some in the midst of life, and consequently it is the dnty and privilege of all to desire, strive for, and expect its attainment now. 3d. This state of evangelical perfection does not consist in an ability to fulfil perfectly the original and absolute law of holiness under which Adam was created, nor does it exclude all liability to mistake, or to the infirmities of the flesh, and of natural temperament, but it does exclude all inward disposition to sin as well as all outward commission of it, since it consists in a state in which perfect faith in Christ and perfect love for God fills the whole soul and governs the entire life, and thus fulfils all the requirements of the \" law of Christ,\" mider which alone the Christian's probation is now held.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} -{"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "189", "sort_key": 189, "group": "Chapter XXXV", "question": "In ivhat sense do they teach that men may live ivithont sin ?", "answer": "Mr. Wesley did not himself use, though he did not object to, the phrase \" sinless perfection.\" He distinguished between \" sin, properly so called, i. e., a voluntary transgression of a known law, and sin, improperly so called, i. e., an involuntary trangression of a divine law, known or unknown,\" and declared \" I believe there is no such perfection in this life as excludes these involuntary transgressions, which I apprehend to be nat- urally consequent on the ignorance and mistakes inseparable from mortality.\" He also declares that the obedience of the perfect Christian \" can not bear the rigor of God's justice, but needs atoning blood,\" and consequently the most perfect \" must continually say, ' forgive us our trespasses,' \" and Dr. Peck says that the holier men are here \" the more they loathe and abhor themselves.\" On the other hand they hold that a Christian may in this life attain to a state of perfect and constant love, which fulfils perfectly all the requirements of the gospel cove- nant. Violations of the original and absolute law of God are not counted to the believer for sin, since for him Christ has been made the end of that law for righteousness, and for Christ's sake he has been delivered from that law and been made sub- ject to the \" law of Christ,\" and that only is sin to the Christian which is a violation of this law of love. See Mr. Wesley's \" Tract on Christian Perfection,\" in the volume of \" i\\Iethodist Doctrinal Tracts,\" pp. 294, 310, 312, and Dr. Peck's \"Christian Doc. of Perfection,\" p. 204. 31. What law do they say the Christian can in this life per- fectly obey ? Dr. Peck says, p. 244, \"To fallen humanity, though renewed by grace, perfect obedience to the moral law is inpracticable during the present probationary state. And consequently Chris- PERFECTIONISM:' OBERLIN VIEW. 533 tian perfection does not imply perfect obedience to the moral law.\"_Peck, p. 244. This moral law they hold to be imiversal and unchangea- ble, all moral agents are under perpetual o1:>ligation8 to fulfil it, and they are in no degree released therefrom by their loss of ability through sin. — Peck, p. 271. This law sustains, how- ever, a twofold i-elation to the creature. 1st. It is a rule of being and acting. 2d. It is a condition of acceptance. _ In con- sequence of sin, it became impossible for men to obtain salva- tion by the law, and therefore Christ appeared and rendered to this law perfect satisfaction in our stead, and thus is for us the end of the law for righteousness. This law, therefore, remain- ing forever as a rule of duty, is abrogated by Christ as a condi- tion of our acceptance. \"Nor is any man living bound to observe the Adamic more than the Mosaic law (I mean it is not the condition either of present or future salvation.)\" — \"Doc- trinal Tracts,\" p. 332. \" The gospel, which is the law of love, the ' law of liberty,' offers salvation upon other terms, and yet provides the vindication of the broken law. The condition of justification at first is faith alone, and the condition of continued acceptance is faith icorJdng by hue. There are degrees of faith, and degrees of love. . . . Perfect faith and perfect lov« is Christian perfection.\" \"Christian character is estimated by the conditions of the gospel ; Christian perfection implies the per- fect performance of these conditions and nothing more.\" 32. By what means do they teach this 'perfection is to he at- tained? Wesley says, \" I believe this perfection is always wrought in the soul by a simple act of faith, consequently in an instant. But I believe there is a gradual work, both preceding and fol- lowing that instant.\" — Quoted by Dr. Peck, pp. 47, 48. They hold that this entire sanctification is not to be effected through either the strength or the merit of man, but entirely of grace, for Christ's sake, by the Holy Ghost, through the in- strumentalit}^ of faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, which faith in- volves our believing, 1st, \" in the sufficiency of the provisions of the gospel for the complete deliverance of the soul from sin.\" 2d. \"That these provisions are made for «s.\" 3d. \"That this blessing is for us noiu.\" — Peck, \"Ch. Doc. Sane,\" pp. 405-407.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "189", "sort_key": 189, "group": "Chapter XXXV", "question": "In ivhat sense do they teach that men may live ivithont sin ?", "answer": "Mr. Wesley did not himself use, though he did not object to, the phrase \" sinless perfection.\" He distinguished between \" sin, properly so called, i. e., a voluntary transgression of a known law, and sin, improperly so called, i. e., an involuntary trangression of a divine law, known or unknown,\" and declared \" I believe there is no such perfection in this life as excludes these involuntary transgressions, which I apprehend to be nat- urally consequent on the ignorance and mistakes inseparable from mortality.\" He also declares that the obedience of the perfect Christian \" can not bear the rigor of God's justice, but needs atoning blood,\" and consequently the most perfect \" must continually say, ' forgive us our trespasses,' \" and Dr. Peck says that the holier men are here \" the more they loathe and abhor themselves.\" On the other hand they hold that a Christian may in this life attain to a state of perfect and constant love, which fulfils perfectly all the requirements of the gospel cove- nant. Violations of the original and absolute law of God are not counted to the believer for sin, since for him Christ has been made the end of that law for righteousness, and for Christ's sake he has been delivered from that law and been made sub- ject to the \" law of Christ,\" and that only is sin to the Christian which is a violation of this law of love. See Mr. Wesley's \" Tract on Christian Perfection,\" in the volume of \" i\\Iethodist Doctrinal Tracts,\" pp. 294, 310, 312, and Dr. Peck's \"Christian Doc. of Perfection,\" p. 204. 31. What law do they say the Christian can in this life per- fectly obey ? Dr. Peck says, p. 244, \"To fallen humanity, though renewed by grace, perfect obedience to the moral law is inpracticable during the present probationary state. And consequently Chris- PERFECTIONISM:' OBERLIN VIEW. 533 tian perfection does not imply perfect obedience to the moral law.\"Peck, p. 244. This moral law they hold to be imiversal and unchangea- ble, all moral agents are under perpetual o1:>ligation8 to fulfil it, and they are in no degree released therefrom by their loss of ability through sin. — Peck, p. 271. This law sustains, how- ever, a twofold i-elation to the creature. 1st. It is a rule of being and acting. 2d. It is a condition of acceptance. In con- sequence of sin, it became impossible for men to obtain salva- tion by the law, and therefore Christ appeared and rendered to this law perfect satisfaction in our stead, and thus is for us the end of the law for righteousness. This law, therefore, remain- ing forever as a rule of duty, is abrogated by Christ as a condi- tion of our acceptance. \"Nor is any man living bound to observe the Adamic more than the Mosaic law (I mean it is not the condition either of present or future salvation.)\" — \"Doc- trinal Tracts,\" p. 332. \" The gospel, which is the law of love, the ' law of liberty,' offers salvation upon other terms, and yet provides the vindication of the broken law. The condition of justification at first is faith alone, and the condition of continued acceptance is faith icorJdng by hue. There are degrees of faith, and degrees of love. . . . Perfect faith and perfect lov« is Christian perfection.\" \"Christian character is estimated by the conditions of the gospel ; Christian perfection implies the per- fect performance of these conditions and nothing more.\" 32. By what means do they teach this 'perfection is to he at- tained? Wesley says, \" I believe this perfection is always wrought in the soul by a simple act of faith, consequently in an instant. But I believe there is a gradual work, both preceding and fol- lowing that instant.\" — Quoted by Dr. Peck, pp. 47, 48. They hold that this entire sanctification is not to be effected through either the strength or the merit of man, but entirely of grace, for Christ's sake, by the Holy Ghost, through the in- strumentalit}^ of faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, which faith in- volves our believing, 1st, \" in the sufficiency of the provisions of the gospel for the complete deliverance of the soul from sin.\" 2d. \"That these provisions are made for «s.\" 3d. \"That this blessing is for us noiu.\" — Peck, \"Ch. Doc. Sane,\" pp. 405-407.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "190", "sort_key": 190, "group": "Chapter XXXV", "question": "Whcd is the Oherlin doctrine of perfection?", "answer": "\" It is a full and perfect discharge of our entire duty, of all existing obligations to God, and all other beings. It is perfect obedience to the moral law.\" This is God's original and uni- 534 S A NOTIFICATION. versal law, which, however, always, not because of grace, but of sheer justice, adjusts its demands to the measure of the pres- ent ability of the subject. The law of God can not now justly demand that we should love him as we might have done if we had always improved our time, etc. Yet a Christian may now attain to a state of \"perfect and disinterested benevolence,\" may be, \"according to his knowledge, as upright as God is,\" and as \"perfectly conformed to the will of God as is the will of the inhabitants of heaven.\" And this, Mr. Finney appears to teach, is essential for even the lowest stage of genuine Christian ex- perience. The amount of the matter appears to be, God has a right to demand only that which we have the power to render; therefore, it follows that we have full power to render all that God demands, and, therefore, we may be as perfectly conformed to his will as it regards us, as the inhabitants of heaven are to his will as it regards them.\" Pres. ]\\Iahan, \" Scripture Doctrines of Christian Perfection,\" and Prof Finney, \" Oberlin Evangelist,\" Vol. IV., No. 19, and Vol. IV., No. 15, as quoted by Dr. Peck. 34. State the points of agreement and disagreement betiveen these several theories, Pelagian, jRomish, Arminian, and Oherlin? 1st. They all agree in maintaining that it is possible for men in this life to attain a state in Avhich they may habitually and perfectly fulfil all their obligations, i. e., to be and do perfectly all that God requires them to be or do at present. 2d. The Pelagian theory differs from all the rest, in denying the deterioration of our natural and moral powers, and conse- quently, in denying the necessity of the intervention of super- nmin-al grace to the end of making men perfect. 3d. The Pelajndau and Oberlin theories agree in making the original moral law of God the standard of perfection. The Oberlin theologians, however, admitting that our powers are deteriorated by sin, hold that God's law, as a matter of sheer justice, adjusts its demands to the present ability of the subject. The Romish tlieory regards the same law as the standard of perfection, bflt differs from the Pelagian theory in maintaining that the demands of this law are adjusted to man's deteriorated pQwers; and on the other hand, it differs from the Oberlin the- ory, .by holding that* he lowering of the demands of this law in adjustment to the enfeebled powers of man, instead of being of sheer justice, is of grace for the merits of Christ. The Ar- minian theory differs from all the rest in denying that the orig- inal law is the standard of evangelical perfection; in holding that that law having been •fulfilled by Christ, the Christian is now required only to fulfil the requirements of the gospel cove- PERFECTIONISM : ARGUMENTS. 535 nant of grace. This, however, appears to differ more in form than essence from the Romish position in this regard. 4th. Tlie Romish and Arminian theories acjvee — 1st. In admitting that the perfect Christian is still liable to transgress the provisions of the original moral law, and that he is subject to mistakes and infirmities. The Romanist calls them venial sins; the Arminian, mistakes or infirmities. 2d. In referring all the work of making man perfect to the efficiency of the Holy Ghost, who is given for Christ's sake. But they differ, on the other hand, 1st, as to the nature of that faith by which sanctification is effected, and, 2d, as to the merit of good works. 35. Wliat are tlie arguments upon lohich perfectionists sustain their theory, and how may they he ansivered? 1st. They argue that this perfection is attainaUe in this life, (1.) From the commands of God, who never will command impossibilities. — Matt. v. 48. (2.) From the fact that abundant provision has already been made in the gospel for securing the perfect sanctification of God's people ; in fact, all the provision that ever will be made. (3.) From the promises of God to redeem Israel from all his iniquities, etc. — Ps. cxxx. 8; Ezek. xxxvi. 25-29; 1 John i. 7, 9. (4.) From the prayers of saints recorded in Scripture with implied approval. — Ps. li. 2 ; Heb. xiii. 21. 2d. They argue that this perfection has in. fact been attained, (1.) From biblical examples, as David. — Acts xiii. 22. See also Gen. vi. 9; Job i. 1; Luke i. 6. (2.) Modern examples — Peck's \" Christian Perfection,\" pp. 365-396. ^ We ANSWER — ^r 1st. The Scriptures never assert that a Christian may in this life attain to a state in which he may live withoi^t sin. 2d. The meaning of special passages must be interpreted in consistency with the entire testimony»of Scripture. 3d. The language of Scripture never implies that man may here live without sin. The commands of God are adjusted to man's responsibility, and the aspirations and j^ayers 'of the saints to their duties and ultimate privileges, and not ta their present ability. Perfection is the true ^m of the Christian's effort in every period of growth and in Wery act. The^lprms \"perfect\" and \"blameless\" are often»relative, or used to sig- nify simple genuineness or ^ncerity. This is evident from the recorded fact — 4th. That all the perfect men of the Scriptures sometimes sinned; witness the histories of Noah, Job, David, Paul, and compare Gen. vi. 9, with Gen. ix. 21, and Job i. 1, with Job iii. 1, 536 SANCTIFICA TION.. and ix. 20; also see Gal. ii. 11, 14; Ps. xix. 12; Eom. vii. ; Gal. V. 17; Phil. iii. 12-14. 36. What S2xcicd objedioivs hear against the Pelagian theory of perfection ? This is a part of a wholly Anti-Christian system. Its con- stituent elements are a denial of the Scripture testimony with regard to original sin, and the work of the Spirit of grace in effectual calling, and an assertion of man's ability to save him- self It involves low views of the guilt and tiirpitude of sin, and of the extent, spirituality, and michangeableness of God's holy law. This is the only perfectly consistent theory of perfec- tion ever ventilated, and in the same proj)ortion it is the most thoroughly unchristian.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "191", "sort_key": 191, "group": "Chapter XXXV", "question": "What special ohjections hear against the Romish theory ?", "answer": "This theory is inconsistent — 1st. With the true nature of sin. It denies that concupis- cence is sin, and admits as such only those deliberate acts of the will which assent to the impulse of concupiscence. It distin- guishes between mortal and venial sins. The truth is that every sin is mortal, and concupiscence, \"sin dwelling in me,\" \"law in my members,\" is of the very essence of sin. — Rom. vii. 8-23. 2d. It is inconsistent with the nature of God's holy law, which is essentially immutable, and the demands of which have never been lowered in accommodation to the weakened faculties of men. 3d. It is essentially connected with their theory of the merit of good works, and of the higher merit of works of supererogation which is radically subversive of the essentials of the gospel.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "192", "sort_key": 192, "group": "Chapter XXXV", "question": "What special ohjections hear against the Oherlin theory ?", "answer": "This theory appears to assimilate more nearly than the others with the terrible self-consistency and the Anti-Christian spirit of the Pelagian view. It differs from that heresy, how- ever, in holding — 1st. That the law of God is. as a matter of sheer justice, accommodated to the weakened faculties of men. 2d. That the shortcomings of men in the present life, as meas- ured by the original law of God, are not sin, since a man's duty is measured only by his ability. 3d. In making the principle of this perfection to consist in \"perfect and disinterested benevolence.\" In all these respects, also, this theory is incon- sistent with the true nature of God's law, the true nature of sin, and the true nature of virtue. PERFECTIONISM : OBJECTIONS. 537", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} @@ -341,3067 +341,3065 @@ {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "227", "sort_key": 227, "group": "Chapter XXXIX", "question": "What was the Zioinglian doctrine on this subject ?", "answer": "That the outward rite is a mere sign, an objective rep- resentation by symbol of the truth, having no efficacy what- ever beyond that due to the truth represented. 38. What is the doctrine of the Reformed churches, and of our otvn among the member, on this subject ? They all agree, 1st, that the Zwinglian view is incomplete. 2d. That besides being a sign, baptism is also the seal of grace, and therefore a present and sensible conveyance and con- firmation of grace to the believer who has the witness in him- self, and to all the elect a seal of the benefits of the covenant of grace, to be sooner or later conveyed in God's good time. 3d. That this conveyance is effected, not by the bare opera- tion of the sacramental action, but by the Holy Ghost, which accompanies his own ordinance. 4th. That in the adult the reception of the blessing depends upon faith. 5th. That the benefits conveyed by baptism are not peculiar to it, but belong to the believer before or without baptism, and are often renewed to him afterwards. Our \"Conf Faith,\" Chap, xxviii., sections 5 and 6, affirms, \"1st. 'That by the right use of this ordinance the grace romised is not only offered, but really exhibited and conferred y the Holy Ghost to such (whether of age or infants), as that grace belongeth unto.' DOCTRINE OF BAPTISMAL REGENERATION. 627 '■ 2d. That baptism does not in all cases secure the blessings of the covenant. \" 3d. That in the cases in which it does the gift is not connected necessarily in time with the administration of the ordinance. \"4th. That these blessings depend upon two things: (1) the right use of the ordinance; (2) the secret purpose of God.\" — Dr. Hodge. 39. Wliat in general is the doctrine hiotvn as Baptismal Regen- eration ? On ivliat ground does it rest ? and liow can it he shoivn to be false ? The Protestant advocates of Baptismal Regeneration, with- out committing themselves to the Romish theory of an opus operation, hold that baptism is God's ordained instrument of communicating the benefits of redemption in the first instance. That whatever gracious experiences ma}^ be enjoyed by the unbaptized, are uncovenanted mercies. That by baptism the guilt of original sin is removed, and the Holy Ghost is given, Avhose effects remain like a seed in the soul, to be actualized by the free-will of the subject, or neglected and hence rendered abortive. Every infant is regenerated when baptized. If he dies in infancy the seed is actualized in paradise. If he lives to adult age, its result depends upon his use of it (Bhuit's \" Diet, of Theology,\" Art. Baptism). See above, Ch. XXIX., Ques. 4. They rest their doctrine on a large class of Scripture pas- sages like the following, \" Christ gave himself for the church that he might sanctify and cleanse it by the washing of water, by the word,\" Eph v. 26, \"Arise and be baptized, and wash away thy sins.\" — Acts xxii. 16. Also John iii. 5; 1 Pet. iii. 21; Gal. iii. 27, etc. The Reformed explain these passages on the following prin- ciples. 1st. In every sacrament there are two things (a) an outward visible sign, and (/;) an inward invisible grace thereby signified. There is between these a sacramental or symbolical relation that naturally gives rise to a nsiis loquendi, whereby the properties and effects of the grace are attributed to the sign. Yet it never follows that the two are inseparable, any more than it proves the absurdity that the two are identical. 2d. The sacraments are badges of religious faith, and neces- sarily involve the profession of that faith. In all ordinary lan- guage, therefore, that faith is presumed to be present, and to be genuine, in which case the grace signified by the sacrament is, of course, always not only offered but conveyed (\" S. Cat.,\" Ques. 91 and 92). 628 BAPTISM. That baptism can not be the only or even the ordinary means of conveying the grace of regeneration (i. e., for initi- ating the soul into a state of grace) is plain. — 1st. Faith and repentance are the fruits of regeneration. But faith and re- pentance are required as conditions prerequisite to baptism. — Acts ii. 38; viii. 37; x. 47, and xi. 17. 2d. This doctrine is identical Avith that of the Pharisees, which Christ and his apostles constantly rebuked. — j\\Iatt. xxiii. 23-26. \" For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but faith that worketh by love — but a new creature.\" — Gal. v. 6, and vi. 15; Rom. ii. 25-29. Faith alone is said to save, the absence of faith alone to damn. — Acts xvi. 31, and ]\\Iark xvi. 1(3. 3d. The entire spirit and method of the gospel is ethical not magical. The great instrument of the Holy Ghost is the truth, and all that is ever said of the eiScacy of the sacraments is said of the efficacy of the truth. They are means of grace therefore in common with the word and as they contain and seal it (1 Pet. i. 23, and John xvii. 17, 19). Our Saviour says \"% their fruits ye shall hioiv them.\" — (i\\Iatt. vii. 20). 4th. This doctrine is disproved by experience. Vast mul- titudes of the baptized of all ages and nations bring forth none of the frviits of regeneration. Multitudes who were never bap- tized have produced these fruits. The ages and communities in which this doctrine has been most strictly held have been conspicuous for spiritual barrenness. 5th. The great evil of the system of which the doctrine of baptismal regeneration is a part, is that it tends to make re- ligion a matter of external and magical forms, and hence to promote rationalistic skepticism among the intelligent, and superstition among the ignorant and morbid, and to dissociate among all classes religion and morality. , The Necessity of Baptism.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "228", "sort_key": 228, "group": "Chapter XXXIX", "question": "What is the Romish doctrine as to the necessity ofhajjtism?", "answer": "That it is by the appointment of God the one means, s/??e qua non, of justification (regeneration, etc.) both fcji\" infants and adults. In the case of adults they except only the case of those who have formed a sincere piu'pose of being baptized, which has been providentially hindered. In the case of infants there is no exception.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "229", "sort_key": 229, "group": "Chapter XXXIX", "question": "What is the Lutheran view?", "answer": "Their standards state the necessity of the sacraments with- out apparent qualification (See \"Aug. Coiif ,\" Art. 9, and \" Apol. THE NECESSITY OF BAPTISM. 629 Aug. Conf.,\" p. 156, quoted under last chapter). But Dr. Krauth has shown from the writings of Luther and their standard the- ologians, that their actual view was that (1) baptism is not essential (as e. g., Christ's atonement is), but that (2) it is neces- sary, as the ordained ordinary means of conferring grace, yet (3) not unconditlonaUij, because the \"necessity\" is limited (a) by the possibility of having it, so that not the deprivation of bap- tism, but the contempt of it condemns a man, and (&) by the fact that all the blessings of baptism are conditioned on faith. (4) Baptism is not always followed by regeneration, and regen- eration is not always preceded by baptism, and men may be saved though unbaptized. (5) That within the church all in- fants are saved although unbaptized. (6) As to infants of heathen, the point undecided, because unrevealed, but hopeful views entertained. — Krauth's \" Conserv. Reform.,\" pp. 557-564.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} -{"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "230", "sort_key": 230, "group": "Chapter XXXIX", "question": "What is the Reformed doctrine ?", "answer": "That it is \"necessary\" because commanded, and universally obligatory, because it is a divinely ordained and most precious means of grace, which it would be impious knowingly and willingly to neglect. And because it is the appointed and com- monhj recognized badge whereby our allegiance to Christ is openly acknowledged. Under the circumstances, intelligent neglect of the sacraments looks very like treason. But baptism does not ordinarily confer grace in the first instance, but presupposes it, and the grace it symbolizes and seals is often realized both before and without their use. — \"Conf. Faith,\" Ch. xxviii., \"Cal. Instit.,\" Bk. IV., ch. xvi., § 26. The Authokitative Ckeed Statements. Romish Doctbine. ''Gil. Cone. Trident.,\" Pt. 2, Ch. 2, Qiies. 5.— \"It foUows that baptism may be accurately and appositely defined to be the sacrament of regen- eration by water in the word. For by nature we are born from Adam children of \\VTath, but by baptism we are regenerated in Christ children of mercy.\" lb., Pt. 2, Ch. 2, Ques. 33. — \"For as no other means of salvation remains for infant children except baptism, it is easy to comprehend the enormity of the guilt under which they lay themselves, who sufler them to be deprived of the gi'ace of the sacrament longer than necessity requires.\" Bellarmin, \"Bapt.,\" 1, 4. — \"The church has always believed that in- fants perish if they depart this life without baptism. For although little children faU of baptism without any fault of then.' own, yet they do not perish without their own faiilt, since they have original sin.\" Lutheran DocTRrNE. — See quotations under last chapter. Quenstedt, iv., 147. — \"By baptism and in baptism the Holy Ghost excites in infants a true, saving, life-giving, and actual faith, whence also baptized infants truly believe.\" 630 BAPTISM. \"Art. SmalcnM,\" pt. 3, art. 5, \"De Baptismo.\" — \"Baptism is nothing else than the word of God with clipping in water, according to his insti- tution and command. . . . The word is added to the element and it becomes a sacrament.\" \"C(xt. Minor,\" iv., Ques. 3. — \"Baptism effects remission of sins, liber- ates from death and the devil, and gives eternal blessedness to all and each who believe this which the word and divine promises hold forth.\" Refoemed Doctbine. '■'■Cat. Giiiiev.,\" p. 522. — \"The signification of baptism has two parts, for therein is rei^resented remission of sins Do you attribute nothing else to the Avater, than that it is only a figure of washing ? I think it is such a figure, that at the same time a truth is joined with it. For God does not disappoint us in promising to us his gifts. Hence it is certain that pardon of sins and newness of life are offered and received by us in baptism.\" C'lliTiu's \"Itistit.,\" B. iv., Ch. 16, | 26. — \"I would not be understood as insinuating that baptism may be contemned with impunity. So far from excusing this contempt, I hold that it violates the covenant of the Lord. The passage (John v. 24) only serves to show that we must not deem baptism so necessary as to supijose that every one who has lost the opportunity of obtaining it has forthwith ijerished. \" '■'Thirtii-nine Art. of Gh. of Enghtiul,\" Axi. 27. — \" Baptism is not only a sign of profession, and mark of difference, whereby Christian men are discerned from others that are not christened, but it is also a sign of re- generation or new birth, whereby, as by an instrument, they that receive baptism rightly are grafted into the church: the promises of the forgive- ness of sin, and of our adoption to be the sons of God by the Holy Ghost, are visibly signed and sealed; faith is confii-med, and grace increased by virtue of prayer unto God.\" \" The baptism of young children is in any wise to be retained in the church, as most agreeable with the institution of Christ. \" \"Cu»f Faith,\" Ch. 28; \"i. Cat.,\" Q. 165-167; \" S. Cat.,\" Q._ 94, 95. I 1. — \"Baptism is a sacrament of the New Testament, ordained by Jesus Christ, not only for the solemn admission of the party baptized into the visible church, but also to be unto him a sign and seal of the covenant of grace, of his ingrafting into Christ, of regeneration, of I'emis- sion of sins, and of his giving up unto God, through Jesus Christ, to walk in newness of Hfe.\" I 5. — \"Although it be a great sin to contemn or neglect this ordinance, yet grace and salvation are not so inseparably annexed unto it, as that no person can be regenerated or saved without it, or that all that are bai> tized are undoubtedly regenerated.\" .^ 6. — \"The efficacy of baptism is not tied to that moment of time wherein it is administered; yet, notwithstanding, by the right tise of this ordinance the grace promised is not only ofl:ered, but really exhibited and conferred by the Holy Ghost, to such (whether of age or infants) as that grace belongeth unto, according to the council of God's own will, in his appointed time.\" SociNiAN Doctbine. — Socinus beheved baptism to have been practiced by the apostles after the death of Christ, and to have been apphcable only to converts from without the church. Socinians generally held baptism to be only a badge of public profession of adherence to Christ, and maintained that immersion is the only proper mode, and adults the only projier subjects. — \"Bacovian Cat.,\" Section 5, Ch. 3. CHAPTER XLIII. THE LORD'S SUPPER. 1. In what passages of the Neiv Testament is the institution of the Lord's Supper recorded ? Matt. xxvi. 26-28; Mark xiv. 22-24; Luke xxii. 17-20; 1 Cor. X. 16, 17 ; and xi. 23-30. 2. Prove that its observance is a perpetual obligation. 1st. From the words of institution, \"Do this in remembrance of me,\" and again \"this do as oft as ye drink it in remembrance of me.\" 2d. Paul's word. — 1 Cor. xi. 26. \" For as often as ye eat this bread and drink this cup ye do show the Lord's death tiU he come.\" 3d. The apostoHc example (Acts ii. 42 and 46; XX. 7, etc). 4th. The frequent reference to it as of perpetual obligation in the apostolical Avritings (1 Cor. x. 16-21, etc). 5th. The practice of the entire Christian church in all its branches from the first. 3. What are the various phrases used in Scripture to designate the Lord's Supper, and their import ? 1st. \"Lord's Supper.\" — 1 Cor. xi. 20. The Greek word deiTtvov, translated supper, designated the dinner, or principal meal of the Jews, taken towards or in the evening. Hence this sacrament received this name because it was instituted at that meal. It was called the \"Lord's,\" because it was instituted by him, to commemorate his death, and signify and seal his grace. 2d. \"Cup of blessing.\" — 1 Cor. x. 16. The cup was blessed by Christ, and the blessing of God is now invoked upon it by the officiating minister. — Matt. xxvi. 26, 27. 3d. \" Lord's Table.\" — 1 Cor. x. 21. Table here stands by a usual figure for the provisions spread upon it. It is the table at which the Lord invites his guests, and at which he presides. 4th. \" Communion.\" — 1 Cor. x. 16. In partaking of this sacrament, the fellowship of the believer with Christ is estab- 632 THE LORD'S SUFFER. lished and exercised in a mutual giving and receiving, and consequently also the fellowship of believers with one another, through Christ. 5th. \" Breaking of bread.\" — Acts ii. 42. Here the symboli- cal action of the officiating minister is put for the whole service.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} +{"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "230", "sort_key": 230, "group": "Chapter XXXIX", "question": "What is the Reformed doctrine ?", "answer": "That it is \"necessary\" because commanded, and universally obligatory, because it is a divinely ordained and most precious means of grace, which it would be impious knowingly and willingly to neglect. And because it is the appointed and com- monhj recognized badge whereby our allegiance to Christ is openly acknowledged. Under the circumstances, intelligent neglect of the sacraments looks very like treason. But baptism does not ordinarily confer grace in the first instance, but presupposes it, and the grace it symbolizes and seals is often realized both before and without their use. — \"Conf. Faith,\" Ch. xxviii., \"Cal. Instit.,\" Bk. IV., ch. xvi., § 26. The Authokitative Ckeed Statements. Romish Doctbine. ''Gil. Cone. Trident.,\" Pt. 2, Ch. 2, Qiies. 5.— \"It foUows that baptism may be accurately and appositely defined to be the sacrament of regen- eration by water in the word. For by nature we are born from Adam children of \\VTath, but by baptism we are regenerated in Christ children of mercy.\" lb., Pt. 2, Ch. 2, Ques. 33. — \"For as no other means of salvation remains for infant children except baptism, it is easy to comprehend the enormity of the guilt under which they lay themselves, who sufler them to be deprived of the gi'ace of the sacrament longer than necessity requires.\" Bellarmin, \"Bapt.,\" 1, 4. — \"The church has always believed that in- fants perish if they depart this life without baptism. For although little children faU of baptism without any fault of then.' own, yet they do not perish without their own faiilt, since they have original sin.\" Lutheran DocTRrNE. — See quotations under last chapter. Quenstedt, iv., 147. — \"By baptism and in baptism the Holy Ghost excites in infants a true, saving, life-giving, and actual faith, whence also baptized infants truly believe.\" 630 BAPTISM. \"Art. SmalcnM,\" pt. 3, art. 5, \"De Baptismo.\" — \"Baptism is nothing else than the word of God with clipping in water, according to his insti- tution and command. . . . The word is added to the element and it becomes a sacrament.\" \"C(xt. Minor,\" iv., Ques. 3. — \"Baptism effects remission of sins, liber- ates from death and the devil, and gives eternal blessedness to all and each who believe this which the word and divine promises hold forth.\" Refoemed Doctbine. '■'■Cat. Giiiiev.,\" p. 522. — \"The signification of baptism has two parts, for therein is rei^resented remission of sins Do you attribute nothing else to the Avater, than that it is only a figure of washing ? I think it is such a figure, that at the same time a truth is joined with it. For God does not disappoint us in promising to us his gifts. Hence it is certain that pardon of sins and newness of life are offered and received by us in baptism.\" C'lliTiu's \"Itistit.,\" B. iv., Ch. 16, | 26. — \"I would not be understood as insinuating that baptism may be contemned with impunity. So far from excusing this contempt, I hold that it violates the covenant of the Lord. The passage (John v. 24) only serves to show that we must not deem baptism so necessary as to supijose that every one who has lost the opportunity of obtaining it has forthwith ijerished. \" '■'Thirtii-nine Art. of Gh. of Enghtiul,\" Axi. 27. — \" Baptism is not only a sign of profession, and mark of difference, whereby Christian men are discerned from others that are not christened, but it is also a sign of re- generation or new birth, whereby, as by an instrument, they that receive baptism rightly are grafted into the church: the promises of the forgive- ness of sin, and of our adoption to be the sons of God by the Holy Ghost, are visibly signed and sealed; faith is confii-med, and grace increased by virtue of prayer unto God.\" \" The baptism of young children is in any wise to be retained in the church, as most agreeable with the institution of Christ. \" \"Cu»f Faith,\" Ch. 28; \"i. Cat.,\" Q. 165-167; \" S. Cat.,\" Q. 94, 95. I 1. — \"Baptism is a sacrament of the New Testament, ordained by Jesus Christ, not only for the solemn admission of the party baptized into the visible church, but also to be unto him a sign and seal of the covenant of grace, of his ingrafting into Christ, of regeneration, of I'emis- sion of sins, and of his giving up unto God, through Jesus Christ, to walk in newness of Hfe.\" I 5. — \"Although it be a great sin to contemn or neglect this ordinance, yet grace and salvation are not so inseparably annexed unto it, as that no person can be regenerated or saved without it, or that all that are bai> tized are undoubtedly regenerated.\" .^ 6. — \"The efficacy of baptism is not tied to that moment of time wherein it is administered; yet, notwithstanding, by the right tise of this ordinance the grace promised is not only ofl:ered, but really exhibited and conferred by the Holy Ghost, to such (whether of age or infants) as that grace belongeth unto, according to the council of God's own will, in his appointed time.\" SociNiAN Doctbine. — Socinus beheved baptism to have been practiced by the apostles after the death of Christ, and to have been apphcable only to converts from without the church. Socinians generally held baptism to be only a badge of public profession of adherence to Christ, and maintained that immersion is the only proper mode, and adults the only projier subjects. — \"Bacovian Cat.,\" Section 5, Ch. 3. CHAPTER XLIII. THE LORD'S SUPPER. 1. In what passages of the Neiv Testament is the institution of the Lord's Supper recorded ? Matt. xxvi. 26-28; Mark xiv. 22-24; Luke xxii. 17-20; 1 Cor. X. 16, 17 ; and xi. 23-30. 2. Prove that its observance is a perpetual obligation. 1st. From the words of institution, \"Do this in remembrance of me,\" and again \"this do as oft as ye drink it in remembrance of me.\" 2d. Paul's word. — 1 Cor. xi. 26. \" For as often as ye eat this bread and drink this cup ye do show the Lord's death tiU he come.\" 3d. The apostoHc example (Acts ii. 42 and 46; XX. 7, etc). 4th. The frequent reference to it as of perpetual obligation in the apostolical Avritings (1 Cor. x. 16-21, etc). 5th. The practice of the entire Christian church in all its branches from the first. 3. What are the various phrases used in Scripture to designate the Lord's Supper, and their import ? 1st. \"Lord's Supper.\" — 1 Cor. xi. 20. The Greek word deiTtvov, translated supper, designated the dinner, or principal meal of the Jews, taken towards or in the evening. Hence this sacrament received this name because it was instituted at that meal. It was called the \"Lord's,\" because it was instituted by him, to commemorate his death, and signify and seal his grace. 2d. \"Cup of blessing.\" — 1 Cor. x. 16. The cup was blessed by Christ, and the blessing of God is now invoked upon it by the officiating minister. — Matt. xxvi. 26, 27. 3d. \" Lord's Table.\" — 1 Cor. x. 21. Table here stands by a usual figure for the provisions spread upon it. It is the table at which the Lord invites his guests, and at which he presides. 4th. \" Communion.\" — 1 Cor. x. 16. In partaking of this sacrament, the fellowship of the believer with Christ is estab- 632 THE LORD'S SUFFER. lished and exercised in a mutual giving and receiving, and consequently also the fellowship of believers with one another, through Christ. 5th. \" Breaking of bread.\" — Acts ii. 42. Here the symboli- cal action of the officiating minister is put for the whole service.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "231", "sort_key": 231, "group": "Chapter XXXIX", "question": "By ichat other terms tvas it designated in the early church ?", "answer": "1st. \" Eucharist,\" from evxapidreo), to give thanks. See Matt, xxvi. 27. This beautifully designates it as a thanksgiving ser- vice. It is both the cup of thanksgiving, wdiereby we celebrate the grace of God and pledge our gratitude to him, and tlie cup of blessing, or the consecrated cup. 2d. \"Suva^ii,'' a coming together, because the sacrament was administered in the public congregation. 3d. \"Aeirovpyia,'^ a sacred ministrafion, appHed to the sacra- ment by way of eminence. From this word is derived the English word liturgy. 4th. ''Qv6ia,^^ sacrifice offering. \"This term was not applied to the sacrament in the proper sense of a propitiatory sacrifice. But (1) because it was accompanied with a collection and obla- tion of alms; (2) because it commemorated the true sacrifice of Cln-ist on the cross; (3) because it was truly a eucharistical sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving, Heb. xiii. 15; (4) because, in the style of the ancients, every religious action, whereby we consecrate any thing to God for his glory and our salvation, is called a sacrifice.\" 5th. 'Aydrcrf. The Agapse, or love feasts, were meals at Avhich all the communicants assembled, and in connection with which they received the consecrated elements. Hence the name of the feast was given to the sacrament itself (3th. Mv6Typiov, a mystery., or a symbolical revelation of truth, designed for the special benefit of initiated Christians. This was applied to both sacraments. In the Scriptures it is applied to all the doctrines of revelation. — Matt. xiii. 11; Col. i. 26. 7th. Missa, ma^s. The principal designation used by the Latin church. The most probable derivation of this term is from the ancient formula of dismission. When the sacred rites were finished the deacons called out, \" Ite, missa est,\" go, it is discharged. — Turretin, L. 19, Q. 21. 5. How is this sacrament defined, and ivhat are the essential points included in the defiidtion ? See \"L. Cat.,\" Q. 168; \"S. Cat.,\" Q. 96. KINDS OF BREAD AND WINE TO BE USED. 633 The essential points of this definition are, 1st, the elements, bread and wine, given and received according to the appoint- ment of Jesus Christ. 2d. The design of the recipient of doing this in obedience to Clirist's appointment, in remembrance of him, to show forth his death till he come. 3d. The promised presence of Christ in the sacrament by his Spirit, \" so that the worthy receivers are not after a corporeal and carnal manner, but by faith, made partakers of Christ's body and blood, with all his benefits, to their spiritual nourishment and growth in grace.\" 6. Wliat kind of bread is to he used in the sacrament^ and what is the usage of the different churches on this point ? Bread of some kind is essential, 1st, from the command of Christ; 2d, from the significancy of the symbol; since bread, as the principal natural nourishment of our bodies, represents his fiesh, which, as living bread, he gave for the life of the world. — John vi. 51. But the kind of bread, whether leavened or unleavened, is not specified in the command, nor is it ren- dered essential by the nature of the service. Christ used unleavened bread because it was present at the Passover. The early Christians celebrated the Communion at a common meal, with the bread of common life, which was leavened. The Romish Church has used unleavened bread ever since the eighth century, and commands the use of the same as the only proper kind, but does not make it essential (\" Cat. Cone. Trident.,\" Pt. 2, ch. iv., §§ 13 and 14). The Greek Church insists upon the use of leavened bread. The Lutheran Church uses unleavened bread. The Eeformed Church, includ- ing the Church of England, regards the use of leavened bread, as the food of common life, to be most proper, since bread in the Supper is the symbol of spiritual nourishment. The use of sweet cake, practiced in some of our churches, is provincial and arbitrary, and is without any support in Scripture, tradi- tion, or good taste. 7. What is the meaning of the term oivo?, wine, in the New Testament, and how does it appear that ivine and no other liquid must be used in the Lord's Sup)'per ? It is evident from the usage of this word in the New Testa- ment that it was designed by the sacred writers to designate the fermented juice of the grape.— Matt. ix. 17; John ii. 3-10; Rom. xiv. 21; Eph. v. 18; 1 Tim. iii. 8; v. 23; Titus ii. 3. This is established by the unanimous testimony of all com- petent scholars and missionary residents in the East. — See Dr. Lindsay W. Alexander's article in Ivitto's \" Cyclopt^dia \" ; 634 THE LORD'S SUPPER. and Dr. AVm. L. Beran's art. on \"AVine\" in \"Smith's Bible Diet.\"; and Dr. Ph. Schaff in Lan_ge's \"Com. on John,\" ch. ii. 1-11, note p. Ill; and Kev. Dr. T. Laurie, missionary, in the \"Bibhotheca Sacra,\" Jan., 1869; and Dr. Justin Perkins' \"Res- idence of\" Eight Years in Persia,\" p. 236; and Dr. Eli Smith in the \"Bib. Sacra,\" 1846, pp. 385, etc.; and Rev. J. H. Shedd (missionary), in \"Interior,\" of July 20, 1871. The Romish Church contends, on the authority of tradition, that water should be mingled with the wine (\"Cat. Cone. Tri- dent., Pt. II., Ch. iv., Ques. 16 and 17). But this has not been commanded, nor is it involved in any way in the symbolical significancy of the rite. That wine and no other liquid is to be used is clear from the record of the institution, Matt. xxvi. 26-29, and from the usage of the apostles. 8. How does it appear that hreahing the bread is an important part of the service ? 1st. The example of Christ in the act of institution, which is particularly noticed in each inspired record of the matter. Matt. xxvi. 2(3 ; Mark xiv. 22 ; Luke xxii. 19 ; 1 Cor. xi. 24. 2d. It is prominently set forth in the reference made by the apostles to the sacrament in the epistles. — 1 Cor. x. 16. The entire service is designated from this one action. 3d. It pertains to the symbolical significancy of the sacra- ment. (1.) It represents the breaking of Christ's body for us. 1 Cor. xi. 24. (2.) It represents the communion of believers, being many in one body. — 1 Cor. x. 17. This is denied by the Lutheran Church, which holds that the \"breaking \"is only a preparation for distribution (see Krauth's \" Conservative Ref- ormation,\" pp. 719-722). 9. What is tJie proper interpretation of 1 Cor. x. 16, and in what sense are tJw elements to he blessed or consea^ated ? The phrase to bless is used in Scriptin*e only in three senses, 1st. To bless God, i. c, to declare his praises, and to utter our gratitude to him. 2d. To confer blessing actually, as God does upon his creatures. 3d. To invoke the blessing of God upon any person or tiling. The \" cup of lilessing which Ave bless \" is the consecrated cup upon which the minister has invoked the divine blessing. As the blessing of God is invoked upon food, and it is thus consecrated unto the end of its natural use, 1 Tim. iv. 5, so the elements are set apart as sacramental signs of an invisible spir- itual grace, to the end of showing forth Christ's death, and of ministering grace to the believing recipient, by the invocation DISTRIBUTION OF THE ELEMENTS ESSENTIAL. 635 by the minister of God's blessing in the promised presence of Cln-ist through his Spirit. The Romish Church teaches that when the priest pro- nounces the words of consecration with the due intention, lie really effects the transubstantiation of the bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ. The form to be used in the consecration of the bread is, \" This is my body.\" The form to be used in consecrating the wine is, \" For this is the chalice of my blood, of the new and eternal testament, the mystery of faith, which shall be shed for you and for many for the remis- sion of sins\" (\"Cat. Cone. Trident,\" Pt. II., Ch. iv., Ques. 19-26). 10. Show that the distribution of tJie elements to the people and their reception by them is an essential part of this sacramejit ? Since the Romish Church has perfectly developed the doc- trines of transubstantiation, and of the sacrifice of the mass, they have logically come to regard the essential design of the ordinance to be effected when the act of consecration has been performed, and hence the distribution of the elements to the people is considered non-essential. Hence they preserve the bread as the veritable body of the Lord shut up in the pyx, carry it about in processions and worship it. Hence they also maintain the right of the priest in the mass to communicate without the people, and to carry the wafer to the sick who are absent from the place of communion. — \"Cone. Trident.,\" Sess. 13, Ch. 6, and cans. 4-7, and Sess. 22, can. 8. Protestants, on the contrary, hold that it is of the essence of this holy ordinance that it is an action, beginning and ending in the appointed use of the elements. \" Take ecd\" said Christ. \" This do in remembrance of me.\" It is a \" breaking of bread,\" an \" eating and drinking \" in remembrance of Clirist, it is a \"communion.\" Protestants all hold, consequently, that tlie distribution and reception of the elements are essential parts of the service, and that when these are accomplished the sac- rament ends. The Lutherans hold that the presence of the flesh and blood of Christ in the sacrament is confined to the time of the sacramental use of the elements, that is to the time of their distribution and reception, and that what remains afterwards is common bread and wine. — \" Form. Concord.,\" Pt. 2, Ch. 7, 82, and 108; \" Conf Faith,\" Ch. 29, § 4. The Reformed Church holds that the elements should be put into the hands of the communicant, and not as Catholics, into his mouth. Christ said, \" take eat,\" and the act is sym- bolical of personal self-appropriation. Since this sacrament is a \" communion \" (1 Cor. x. 16, 17) of the members with one another and with Christ together, the 636 THE LORD'S SUPPER. rite is abused when the elements are sent to persons absent from the company among whom it is celebrated, and all pri- vate communion of ministers or laymen is absurd. In case of need all Reformed Churches allow the pastor and elders to go, with as many Christian friends as the case admits of, and hold a communion in the chamber of sick believers, who otherwise would be unable to attend (Gen. Assem. 0. S., 1863, \" Moore's Digest.,\" p. 668). 11. What should he the nature of the exercises during the distri- bution of the elements ? \"The Sacraments are seals of the Covenant of Grace\" formed between Christ and his people, and in the Lord's Supper \" the worthy receivers really and truly receive and apply unto them- selves Christ crucified,\" each believer being made \"a priest unto God\" (1 Pet. ii. 5; Rev. i. 6), \"having liberty to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus\" (Heb. x. 19). From all this it necessarily follows that in this sacrament the communicants are to act immediately in their covenanting ivith the Lord. The minister ought never, therefore, to throw the commu- nicants into a passive attitude as the recipients of instructions or exhortations. All such didactic and hortatory exercises being assigned to the \"preparatory\" services, and to the ser- mon before communion, the minister should confine himself to leading the commimicants in the ait of communion in exe^xises of direct ivorshlp, such as suitable prayers and hymns. And all the prayers and hymns associated with this holy ordinance should be specifically appropriate to it, and not merely of a general religious character. The Relation of the Sign and the Grace Signified. 12. What is the Bomish doctrine on this subject? And hoiv is it expressed by the term Transubstantiation? The early fathers spoke of the presence of Christ in the Supper in indefinite language, and with a general tendency to exaggeration. Their metaphorical language tended to a con- fusion between the symbols of religious service and tlie spir- itual ideas represented. As the ministry came to be regarded as a priesthood, and the only channels of grace to the people, the sacraments were more and more exalted into the necessary instruments through which they acted. With the conception of a real priesthood necessarily emerged the need of a real sac- rifice; and for the reality of the sacrifice the real presence of a divine incarnate victim also was necessarily provided. ROMISH DOCTRINE OF TRANSUBSTANTIATION. 637 The doctrine in its present form was first brought out ex- plicitly by Paschasius Radbert, abbot of Corbet (a. d. 831). It was opposed b}^ Ratramnus, but gradually gained ground. The term transuhstantiatio., conversion of substance, was used to define it in the first instance by Hildebert of Tours (tll34). It was first decreed as an article of faith, at the instance of Innocent in., by the fourth \" Lateran Council,\" a. d. 1215. Their doctrine is that when the words of consecration are pronounced by the priest — 1st. The whole substance of the bread is changed into the very body of Christ which was born of the Virgin, and is now seated at the right hand of the Father in heaven, and the whole substance of the wine is changed into the blood of Christ. 2d. That as in his theanthropic person the soul is inseparable from the body, and the divinity from the soul, so in the sacrament the soul and body of the Re- deemer is present with his flesh and blood. 3d. That only the species, or sensible qualities of the bread and wine remain, accidentia sine subjecto, and that the substance of the flesh and blood is present without their accidents. 4th. This conversion of substance is permanent, so that the flesh and blood remain permanently and are to be preserved and adored as such. They rest their doctrine on Scripture (^Hic est corpus meum), tradition, and the authority of councils. 13. On what grounds does the Romish Church withhold the 2ise of the cup from all except the officiating priest ? and ivhat is their doctrine of ' concomitance ' ? The Eai'ly Church for ages, and the Greek and all Protestant Churches to the present time, follow the example of Christ and his apostles in distributing among all communicants both the bread and the wine, \".sm6 utraque forma.\" The Romish Church however, for fear that some portion of the Lord's person might be unintentionally desecrated, has restricted the cup to the offi- ciating minister alone. The only exception .allowed is when the cardinals receive the cup from the pope ofiiciating on Holy Thursday. The Hussite War had for its principal object the gaining for the people the privilege of communicating in both kinds. To defend their custom theologians advanced the doc- trine that the whole Christ is present in each of the elements, to which Thomas Aquinas first gave the name concomitantia. The body includes the nerves, sinews, and all else that is nec- essaiy to a complete body; and as the blood is inseparable from the flesh, and the soul from the body, and the divinity from the soul, it follows that the entire person of the Redeemer is present in each particle of both elements, separation having been made. He, therefore, who receives any fraction of the 638 THE LORD'S SUPPER. bread receives blood as well as flesh, because he receives the whole Christ. 14. Present the arguments proving the Romish doctrine of the relation of the sign to the thing signified to be unscriptural as well as irrational. 1st. The sole Scriptural argument of the Romanists is derived from the words of institution, \"This is my body\" (Matt. xxvi. 26). Protestants answer. This phrase in this place must mean, \" this bread represents, or symbolizes, my body.\" This is evi- dent— (1.) Because such language in Scripture must often be so interpreted, e. g., Gen. xli. 26, 27 — \"The seven good kine are seven j-ears: and the seven good ears are seven years.\" Dan. vii. 24 — \"And the ten horns are ten kings.\" Ex. xii. 11; Ezek. xxxvii. 11 — \"These bones are the whole house of Israel.\" Matt. xiii. 19, 37; Rev. i. 20 — \"The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the seven candlesticks are the seven churches.\" (2.) In this case any other interpretation is ren- dered impossible by the fact that Christ was sitting present in the body when he spoke the words, and that he also eat the bread. (3.) Also by what Christ says of the cup. Matt., \"This cvp is my blood.\" Luke, \"This cup is the New Testament in my blood.\" Paul (1 Cor. x. 16) says the cup is the Hoivoovia of the blood, and the bread is the xotrcovia of the body of Christ. 2d. Paul calls one of the elements bread, as well after as before its consecration. — 1 Cor. x. 16; xi. 26-28. 3d. This doctrine is inconsistent with their own definition of a sacrament. They agree with Protestants and with the fathers in distinguishing, in every sacrament, two things, viz., the sign and the thing signified. See above. Chap. XLI., Ques- tion 2. But the doctrine of transubstantiation confounds these together. 4th. The senses, when exercised in their proper sphere, are as much a revelation from God as any other. No miracle re- corded in the Bible contradicted the senses, but, on the con- trary, the reality of the miracle was established by the testi- mony of the senses. See the transubstantiation of water into wine. — John ii. 1-10, and Luke xxiv. 36-43. But this doctrine flatly contradicts our senses, since we see, smell, taste, and touch the bread and wine as well after their consecration as before. 5th. Reason also, in its proper sphere, is a divine revelation, and though it may be transcended, never can be contradicted by any other revelation, supernatural or otherwise. See above, Chap. III., Question 14. But this doctrine contradicts the prin- ciples of reason (1) with respect to the nature of Christ's body, LUTHERAN VIEW OF THE LORD'S PRESENCE. 639 by supposing that, although it is material, it may be, without division, wholly present in heaven, and at many different places on earth at the same time. (2.) In maintaining that the body and blood of Christ are present in the sacrament, yet without any of their sensible qualities, and that all the sensible qualities of tlie bread and wine are present, while the bodies to which they belong are absent. But qualities have no existence apart from the substances to which they belong. 6th. This doctrine is an inseparable part of a system of priestcraft entirely anti-Christian, including the worship of the host, the sacrifice of the mass, and hence the entire substitu- tion of the priest and his work in the place of Christ and his work. It also blasphemously subjects the awful divinity of our Saviour to the control of his sinful creatures, wlio at their own will call him down from heaven, and withhold or commu- nicate him to the people. 15. Staie the LidJieran vieiv as to the nature of Christ's pres- ence in the Eucharist. The Lutherans hold — 1st. The communicatio idiomatum, or that the personal union of the divine and human natures involve the sharing of the humanity at least with the omnipres- ence of the divinity. The entire person of the incarnate God, body, soul, and divinity are everywhere. 2d. That the lan- guage of our Lord in the institution, \"This (bread) is my body,\" is to be understood literally. They, therefore, hold — 1st. That the entire person, body and blood of Christ are really and corporeally present in, Avith, and under the sensible elements. 2d. That they are received by the mouth. 3d. That they are received by the unbeliever as well as by the believer. But the unbeliever receives them to his own condemnation. On the other hand they deny — 1st. Transubstantiation ; hold- ing that the bread and wine remain (as to their substance) what they appear. 2d. That the pi-esence of Christ in the sacrament is effected by the officiating minister. 3d. That the presence of Christ in the elements is permanent; being sacramental, it ceases when the sacrament is over. 4th. That the bread and wine only represent Christ's body and blood. 5th. That the presence of the true body and blood is \" spiritual,\" in the sense of being mediated either (a) through the Holy Ghost, or (6) through the faith of the recipient. 16. State the doctrine of the Reformed Church. Luther's activity as a reformer extended from 1517 to 1546; Melanchthon's from 1521 to 1560; Zwingle's from his appear- 640 THE LORD'S SUPPER. ance at Zurich, 1518, to his death, 1531; Calvin's from 1536 to 1564 The Marburg Colloquy was held October, 1529; the Augsburg Confession published June, 1530; and the first edi- tion of \"Calvin's Institutes\" was published at Basle, 1536, and the finislied work Avas published by him in Geneva, 1559. I. Zwingle held that the bread and wine are mere memo- rials of the body of Christ absent in heaven. His view at first prevailed among the Eeformed churches, and was embodied in Zwingle's \"Fidei Ratio,\" sent to the diet at Augsburg, 1530; the \"Confessio Tetrapolitana,\" by Martin Bucer, 1530; the \"First Basle Confession,\" by Oswald Myconius, 1532; and the \"First Helvetic Confession,\" by Bullinger, Myconius, etc., 1536. II. Calvin occupied middle ground between the Zwinglians and Lutherans. He held — (1.) In common with Zwingle and all the Reformed that the words \"This is my body,\" means \"this bread represents my body.\" (2.) That God in this sacrament offers to all, and gives to all believing recipients, through the eating and drinking the bread and wine, all the sacrificial ben- efits of Christ's reden)ption. (3.) He also taught that besides this the very body and blood of Christ, though absent in heaven, communicate a life-giving influence to the believer in the act of receiving the elements. But that this influence though real and vital is (a) mystical not physical, {h) mediated through the Holy Ghost, (c) conditioned upon the act of faith by which the communicant receives them. This view is set forth chiefly in his \"Institutes,\" Bk. 4, Ch. 17, and in the \"Gallic Confession,\" Art. 36, prepared by a Synod in Paris, 1559; in the \"Scottish Confession,\" Art. 21, by John Knox, 1560; and the \"Belgic Confession,\" Art. 35, by Von Bres, 1561, III. After all hope of reconciling the Lutherans with the Reformed branches of the church on this subject was exhausted, Calvin drew up the Consensus Tigurimts in 1549 for the purpose of uniting the Zurich-Zwinglian with the Genevan-Calvinistic party in one doctrine of the Eucharist. It was accepted by both parties, and the doctrine it presents has ever since been received as the consensus of the Reformed churches. It pre- vails in the \"Second Helvetic Confession,\" by Bullinger, 1564; the \" Heidelberg Catechism,\" by Ursinus, a student of Me- lanchthon, 1562; the \"Thirty-nine Articles of the Church of England,\" 1562; and the \"Westminster Confession of Faith,\" 1648. These all agree — 1st. As to the \"presence\" of the flesh and blood of Christ. (1.) His human nature is in heaven only. (2.) His Person as God-man is omnipresent everywhere and always, our communion is with his entire person rather than with his flesh and blood (see above, Ch. XIII., Ques. 13 and 16) EFFICACY OF THIS SACRAMENT. 641 (3.) The presence of his flesh and blood in the sacrament is neither physical nor local, but only through the Holy Spirit, affecting the soul graciously. 2d. As to iliat which the believer feeds upon, they agreed that it was not the \" substance \" but the virtue or efficacy of his body and blood, i. e., their sacrificial virtue, as broken and shed for sin. 3d. As to the \"feeding\" of believers upon this \"body and blood,\" they agreed — (1.) It Avas not with the mouth in any manner. (2.) It was by the soul alone. (3.) It was b}' faith, the mouth or hand of the soul. (4.) By or through the power of the Holy Ghost. (5.) It is not confined to the Lord's Supper. It takes place whenever faith in him is exercised. — \" Bib. Kef,\" April, 1848. The Efficacy of this Sacrament. 17. What is the Bomish doctrine as to the efficacy of the Eucha- rist, and in ivhat sense and on what ground do they hold that it is also a sacrifice ? They distinguish between the eucharist as a sacrament, and as a sacrifice. As a sacrament its effect is that ex opere operato the receiver who does not present an obstacle, is nourished spiritually, sanctified and replenished with merit by the actual substance of the Redeemer eaten or drunk. On the other hand — \" The sacrifice of tlie mass is an exter- nal oblation of the body and blood of Christ offered to God in recognition of his supreme Lordship, under the appearance of bread and wine visibly exhibited by a legitimate minister, with the addition of certain prayers and ceremonies prescribed by the church for the greater worship of God and edification of the people.\" — Dens, Vol. v., p. 358. With respect to its end it is to be distinguished into, 1st, Latreuticum, or an act of supreme worship offered to God. 2d. Eucharisticum, thanksgiving. 3d. Propitiatorium, atoning for sin, and propitiating God l)y the offering up of the body and blood of Cln-ist again. 4th. Imperatorium, since through it we attain to many spiritual and temporal blessings. — Dens, Vol. v., p. 368. The difference between the eucharist as a sacrament and a sacrifice is very great, and is twofold ; as a sacrament it is per- fected by consecration, as a sacrifice all its efficacy' consists in its oblation. As a sacrament it is to the worthy receiver a source of merit, as a sacrifice it is not only a source of merit, but also of satisfaction, expiating the sins of the living and the dead. — \"Cat. Rom.,\" Ft. II., Chap, iv., Q. 55; \"Council Trent,\" Sess. 22. 642 THE LORD'S SUPPER. They found this doctrine npon the authority of the church, and absurdly appeal to Mai. i. 11, as a prophecy of this perpet- ually recurrent sacrifice, and to the declaration, Heb. vii. 17, that Christ is \" a priest forever, after the order of Melchizedec,\" who, say they, discharged his priestly functions in offering bread and wine to Abraham. — Gen. xiv. 18.", "answer_with_proofs": null, "proofs": [], "sub_questions": null} {"_source_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "_source_title": "Outlines of Theology", "_author": "A. A. Hodge", "_contributors": [], "_schema_type": "catechism_qa", "_license": "public-domain", "_source_url": "https://archive.org/download/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg/outlinesoftheolo1879hodg_djvu.txt", "document_id": "aa-hodge-outlines", "item_id": "232", "sort_key": 232, "group": "Chapter XXXIX", "question": "How may this doctrhie he refuted?", "answer": "1st. It has no foundation whatever in Scripture. Their appeal to the prophecy in Malachi, and to the typical relation of Melchizedec to Christ, is self-evidently absurd. 2d. It rests wholly upon the fiction of transubstantiation, which was disproved above. Question 14. 3d. The sacrifice of Christ on the cross was perfect, and from its essential nature excludes all others. — Heb. ix. 25-28; X. 10-14 and 18, 26, 27. 4th. It is inconsistent with the words of institution pro- nounced by Christ. — Luke xxii. 19, and 1 Cor. xi. 24-26. The sacrament commemorates the sacrifice of Christ upon the cross, and consequently can not be a new propitiatory sacrifice itself For the same reason the essence of a sacrament is different from that of a sacrifice. The two can not coexist in the same ordinance. 5th. It belonged to the very essence of all propitiatory sac- rifices, as well to the typical sacrifices of the Old Testament, as to the all-perfect one of Christ, that life should be taken, that blood should be shed, since it consisted in vicariously suffering the penalty of the law. — Heb. ix. 22. But the Papists them- selves call the mass a bloodless sacrifice, and it is wholly with- out pain or death. 6th. A sacrifice implies a priest to present it, but the Chris- tian ministry is not a priesthood. — See above, Chap. XXIV., Question 21. 19. What is the Lutheran vleio as to the efficacy of the sac- rament ? The Lutheran view on this point is that the efficacy of the sacrament resides not in the signs, but in the word of God con- nected Avith them, and that it is operative only when there is true faith in the receiver. This effect is identical with that of the word, and through faith includes the benefits of vital com- munion witli Christ and all the fruits thereof It, however, lays stress upon the virtue of the literal body and blood of Christ as present in, with, and imder, the bread and wine. This body and blood, being physically received equally by EFFICACY OF THIS SACRAMENT. 643 the believer and unbeliever, but being of gracious avail only in the case of the believer. — Luther's \" Small Cat.,\" Part V., Krauth's \" Conserv. Eeform.,' pp. 825-829. 20. What is the so-called Zwinglian and Remonstrant and So- cinian vieiv as to the efficacy of the Eucharist ? Zwingle died preraatiu-ely. He undoubtedly took too low a view of the sacraments. If he had lived he would, doubtless, have accompanied his disciples in their union with Calvin in the adoption of the Consensus Tigurinus. The doctrine ever since known by his name, and really held by the Socinians and Remonstrants, differs from the Reformed — 1st. In making the elements mere signs; and in denying that Christ is in any special sense present in the eucharist. 2d. In denying that they are means of grace, and holding that they are bare acts of commemoration and badges of profession. 21. What is the view of the Reformed churches upon this subject ? They rejected the Romish view which regards the efficacy of the sacrament as inhering in it physically as its intrinsic prop- erty, as heat inheres in fire. They rejected also the Lutheran view as far as it attributes to the sacrament an inherent super- natural power, due indeed not to the signs, but to the word of God wliich accompanies them, but which, nevertheless, is always operative, provided there be faith in the receiver. And, thirdly, they rejected the doctrine of the Socinians and others, that the sacrament is a mere badge of profession, or an empty sign of Christ and his benefits. They declared it to be an effica- cious means of grace ; but its efficacy, as such, is referred neither to any virtue in it, nor in him that administers it, but solely to the attending operation of the Holy Ghost (virtus Spiritus Sancti extrinsecus accedens), precisely as in the case of the word. It has indeed the moral objective power of a signifi- cant emblem, and as a seal it really conveys to every believer the grace of which it is a sign, and it is set apart with especial solemnity as a meeting point between Christ and his people ; but its power to convey grace depends entirely, as in the case of the word, on the co-operation of the Holy Ghost. Hence the power is in no way tied to the sacrament. It may be exerted without it. It does not always attend it, nor is it confined to the time, place, or service. — \"Bib. Ref,\" April, 1848; see \"Gal. Conf,\" Arts. 36 and 37; \" Helv.,\" ii., c. 21; \"Scotch Conf,\" Art. 21; 28th and 29th \"Articles of Church of Eng- land\"; also our own standards, \"Conf Faith,\" Chapter xxix., section 7. 644 THE LORD'S SUPPER, 22. What do 02(r standards teach as to the qualifications for admission to the Lord's Supper? 1st. Only those who are truly regenerated by the Holy Ghost are qualified, and only those who profess faith in Christ and walk consistently are to be admitted. 2d. Wicked and ignorant persons, and those who know themselves not to be regenerate, are not qualified, and ought not to be admitted by the church oflicers. — \" Conf. Faith,\" Ch. xxix., section 8; \" L. Cat.,\" Question 173. 3d. But since man}^ who doubt as to their being in Christ are nevertheless genuine Christians, so if one thus doubtiiig unfeignedly desires to be found in Christ, and to depart from iniquity, he ought to labor to have his doubts resolved, and, so doing, to come to the Lord's Supper, that he may be further strengthened. — \" L. Cat.,\" Question 172. 4tli. \"Children born within the pale of the visible chiu'ch, and dedicated to God in baptism, when they come to years of discretion, if they be free from scandal, appear sober and steady, and to have sufficient knowledge to discern the Lord's body, they ought to be informed it is their duty and their privilege to come to the Lord's Supper.\" \"The years of dis- cretion in young Christians can not be precisely fixed. This must be left to the prudence of the eldership.\" — \"Direct, for Worship,\" Chap. ix. 23. What is the practice which prevails in the different churches on this subject, and on lohat j^rinciples does such practice rest ? 1st. The Romanists make the condition of salvation to be union with and obedience to the church, and, consequently, admit all to the sacraments who express their desire to con- form and obey. \"No one,\" however, \"conscious of mortal sin, and having an opportunity of recurring to a confessor, however contrite he may deem himself, is to approach the holy eucha- rist, until he is purified by sacramental confession.\" — \"Coun. Trent,\" sess. 13, canon 11. The Lutherans agree with them in admitting all who conform to the external requirements of the church. 2d. High Church prelatists, and others who regard the sac- raments as in themselves effective means of grace, maintain that even those who, knowing themselves to be destitute of the fruits of the Spirit, nevertheless have speculative faith in the gospel, and are free from scandal, and desire to come, should be admitted. 3d. The faith and practice of all the evangelical churches is that the communion is designed only for believers, and there- QUALIFICATIONS FOR COMMUNION. 645 fore, that a credible profession of faith and obedience shonld be required of every applicant. (1.) The Baptist churches, denjnng; altogether the rig-lit of infant clrurch membership, receive all applicants for the communion as from the world, and therefore demand 2^o.s/^/t'e evidences of the new birth of all. (2.) All the Pedobaptist churches, maintaining that all children baptized in infancy are already members of the church, distinguish between the admission of the children of the church to the communion, and the admission de novo to the church of the unbaptized alien from the world. With regard to the former, the presumption is that they should come to the Lord's table when they arrive at \"years of discretion, if they be free from scandal, appear to be sober and steady, and to have sufficient knowledge to dis- cern the Lord's body.\" In the case of the unbaptized world- ling, the presumption is that they are aliens until they bring a credible profession of a change. 24. How may it he proved that the Lord's Supper is not designed for the unreneived ? It can, of course, be designed only for those who are spirit- ually qualified to do in reality what every recipient of the sac- rament does in form and professedly. But this ordinance is essentially — 1st. A profession of Christ. 2d. A solemn covenant to accept Christ and his gospel, and to fulfil the conditions of discipleship. 3d. An act of spiritual communion with Christ. The qualifications for acceptable communion, therefore, are such knowledge, and such a spiritual condition, as shall enable the recipient intelligently and honestly to discern in the em- blems the Lord's body as sacrificed for sin, to contract with him the gospel covenant, and to hold fellowship with him through the Spirit. 25. What have the church and its officers a right to require of those whom they admit to the Lord's Supper ? \"The officers of the church are the judges of the qualifica- tions of those to be admitted to sealing ordinances.\" \"And those so admitted shall be examined as to their knowledge and piety.\" — \"Direct, for Worsh.,\" Chap. ix. As God has not endowed any of these officers with the power of reading the heart, it follows that the qualifications of which they are the judges are simply those of competent knowledge, purity of life, and credible profession of faith. [By \"credible\" is meant not that which convinces, but that which can be believed to be genuine.] It is their duty to examine the applicant as to 646 THE LORD'S SUPPER. his knowledge, to watch and inquire concerning his Avalk and conversation, to set before him faithful!}^ the inward spiritual quahfications requisite for acceptable communion, and to hear his profession of that spiritual faith and purpose. The respon- sibility of the act then rests upon the individual professor, and not upon the session, wlio are never to be understood as passing judgment upon, or as indorsing the validity of his evidences. 26. What is the difference hetiveen the Presbyterian and the Congregational churches upon this point? There exists a difference between the traditionary views and practice of these two bodies of Christians with respect to the abihty, the right, and the duty of church officers, of form- ing and affirming a positive official judgment upon the in- ward spiritual character of applicants for church privileges. The Cougregationalists understand by \"credible profession\" the positive evidence of a religious experience which satisfies the official judges of the gracious state of the applicant. The Presbyterians understand by that phrase only an intelligent profession of true spiritual faith in Christ, which is not contra- dicted by the life. Dr. Candlish, in the \"Edinburgh Witness,\" June 8th, 1848, says, \"The principle (of communion), as it is notorious that the Presbyterian church has always held it, does not constitute the pastor, elders, or congregation, judges of the actual con- version of the applicant; but, on the contrary, lays much re- sponsibility upon the applicant himself The minister and kirk session must be satisfied as to his competent knowledge, cred- ible profession, and consistent walk. They must determine negatively that there is no reason for pronouncing him not to be a Christian, but they do not undertake the responsibility of p(3sitively judging of his conversion. This is the Presbyte- rian rule of discipline, be it right or wrong, differing materially from that of the Cougregationalists. In practice there is room for much dealing with the conscience under either rule, and persons destitute of knowledge and of a credible profession are excluded.\" AUTHOKITATIVE STATEMENTS OF ChURCH DoCTEINE. EOMISH DoCTEINE. — DOCTBINE OF THE EuCHAKIST BOTH AS A SaCKA- MENT AND AS A SaCBIFICE. ''Gone. Trident., \" Sess. 13, can. 1.— \"If any one deuieth, that, in the sacrament of the most holy Eucharist, are contained truly, really, and substantially, the hody and blood together with the soul and divinity of oiu- Lord Jesus Christ, and consequently the whole Christ ; but_ saith that he is only therein as in a sign, or in figure, or virttie; let him be anathema.\" AUTHORITATIVE STATEMENTS OF DOCTRINE. 647 Can. 2. — \"If aoy one saith, that, in tlie sacred and lioly sacrament of the Eucharist, the substance of the bread and wine remains conjointly with the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, and denieth that wonderful and singular conversion of the whole substance of the bread into the body, and the whole substance of the wine into the blood — the si^ecies (accidents) of the bread and wine remaining — which conver- sion iudeed the Catholic Church most aptly calls Transubstantiation ; let him be anathema.\" Can. 3. — \"If any one denieth, that, in the venerable sacrament of the Eucharist, the whole Christ is contained under each species, and under every part of each species, when separation has been made; let him be anathema.\" Can. 4. — \"If any one saith, that, after the consecration has been completed, the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ are not in the admirable sacrament of the Eucharist, but (are there) only during the use, whilst it is being taken, and not either before or after; and that in the host, or consecrated jjarticles, which are received or remain after communion, the true body remaineth not; let him be anathema.\" Can. 6. — \"If any one saith, that, in the holy sacrament of the Eucha- rist, Christ, the only begotten Sou of God, is not to be adored with the worship, even external, of latria; and is, consequently, neither to be venerated with special festive solemnity, nor to be solemnly borne about in processions, according to the laudable and universal rite and custom of holy church; or, is not to be exiJosed publicly to the people to be adored, and that the adorers thereof are idolaters; let him be anathema.\" Can. 7. — \"If any one shall say that it is not lawful for the sacred Eucharist to be reserved in the sacrtirium, but that immediately after consecration, it must necessarily be distributed amongst those present; or, that it is not lawful that it be carried with honor to the sick; let him be anathema.\" Can. 8. — \"If any one saith that Christ, given in the Eucharist, is eaten spiritually only, and not also sacramentally and really; let him be anathema.\" Can. 10. — \"If any one saith, that it is not lawful for the celebrating priest to communicate by himself; let him be anathema.\" Sess. 21, Can. 1. — \"If any one saith, that, by the precept of God, or by necessity of salvation, all and each of the faithful of Christ ought to receive both species of the most holy sacrament of the Eucharist; let him be anathema.\" Can. 2. — \"If any one saith that the holy Catholic Church was not induced, by just causes and reasons, to communicate under the species of bread only, laymen and also clerics when not consecrating; let him be anathema.\" Can. 3. — \" If any one denieth that Christ whole and entire — the foun- tain and author of all graces — is received under the one species of bread; because that — as some falsely assert — he is not received according to the institution of Christ himself under both sjjecies; let him be anathema.\" Sess. 22, Can. 1. — \"If any one saith, that in the mass, a true and proper sacrifice is not made to God; or, that to be otfered is nothing else but that Christ is given us to eat; let him be anathema.\" Can. 2. — \"If any one saith, that by those words. Do this for the com- memoration of me (Luke xxii. 19), Christ did not institute the apostles priests; or did not ordain that they and other priests should offer his own body and blood; let him be anathema.\" Can. 3. — \"If any one saith that the sacrifice of the mass is only a G48 THE LORD'S SUPPER. sacrifice of praise and of thanksgiving; or, that it is a bare commemora- tion of the sacrifice consummated on the cross, but not a propitiatoiy sacrifice; or, that it profits him only that receives; and that it ought not to be offered for the living and for the dead, for sins, i^ains, satisfactions, and other necessities; let him be anathema.\" Can. 8. — \"If any one saith, that masses, wherein the priest alone communicates sacrameutally, are unlawful , . let him be anathema.\" Chap. 2. — \"Forasmuch as in this divine sacrifice which is celebrated in the mass, that same Christ is contained and immolated in an unbloody manner, who once offered himself in a bloody manner on the altar of the cross . . . therefor, not only for the sins,' punishments, satisfactions, and other necessities of the faithful who are living, but also for those who are departed in Christ, and who are not as yet fully purified, is it rightly offered agreeably to a tradition of the apostles. \" Bellarmin, '■^ Controv. de Euchrir.\" y. 5.- — \"The sacrifice of the mass has not an efficacy ex opere o/ientto after the manner of a sacrament. The sacrifice does not operate efficiently and immediately, nor is it properly the instrument of God for making just. It does not make just imme- diately as baptism and absolution do, but it impetrates the gift of peni- tence, through which a sinner is made willing to api^roach the sacrament, and by this be justified. . . The sacrifice of the mass is the procurer not only of spiritual but also of temporal benefits, and therefore it can be offered for sins, for punishments, and for any other necessary uses. \" Lutheran Docteine. \"Aiu/shxrg Co/i/V.s.s-/o/t,\" Pars 1, Art. 10; \" Apol. A/ic/x. Co///.,\" p. 157 (Hase) ; '' Formuhi CitnconJui^'' Pars 1, ch. 7, | 1. — \"We believe, teach, and profess that in the Lord's Supper the body and blood of Christ are truly and substantially present, and that together with the bread and wine they are truly distributed and received, g 2. — The words of Christ (this is my body) are to be understood only in their strictly literal sense; so that neither the bread signifies the absent body of Christ, nor the wine the absent blood of Christ, but so that on account of the sacra- mental union the bread and wine truly are the body and blood of Christ. 'i 3. — As to what pertains to the consecration we believe, etc., that no human-act, nor any utterance of the minister of the church, is the cause of the presence of the body and blood of Christ in the Supj^er, but that this is to be attributed solely to the omnipotent power of our Lord Jesus Christ. I 5. — The grounds, however, on which, in this matter, we con- tend against the Sacramentarians, are these. . . Tlhe first ground is an article of our Christian faith, namely, Jesus Christ is true, essential, natural, perfect God and man, in unity of i^erson insei^arable and undi- vided. The second is that the right hand of God is everywhere; but there Christ has, truly and in very deed, been placed, in respect to his humanity, and therefoi-e being present he rules, and holds in his hands and under his feet all things which are in heaven and on earth. The Hard is that the word of God can not be false. The fourth is that God knows and has in his power various modes in which it is possible to be in a place (present), and he was not restricted to that single mode of presence which ijhilosophers have been accustomed to call local or cir- cumscribed. I 6. — We believe, etc., that the body and blood of Christ are received not only spiritually through faiih, but also by the mouth, not after a cai^ernaitish, but a suj)ernatural and celestial manner, by vii'tue of a sacramental union. . . | 7. — We believe, etc., that not only those who believe in Christ, and worthily approach the Lord's SupiJer, but also the unworthy and unbelievers receive the true body AUTHORITATIVE STATEMENTS OF DOCTRWE. G49 and blood of Christ, so that, however, they shall not thence derive either consolation or life, but rather that this receiving shall fall out to judg- ment to them, unless they be converted and exei'cise repentance.\" Doctrine of the Reformed Churches. \" Gdllic Cuiif.,'^ Ai't. 36. — -\"Although Christ is now in heaven, there also to remain till he shall come to judge the world, yet we believe that he, by the hidden and incomprehensible joower of his Spirit, nourishes and vivifies us with the substance of his body and blood, apj)rehended by faith.\" ^'■Scottish Conf.\" — \"And althovigh there is gTeat distance of place be- tween his now glorified body in heaven and us mortals now upon the earth, yet we nevertheless believe that the bread which we break is the communion of his body, alid the cup which we bless is the communion of his blood. . . So we confess that believers in the right use of the Lord's Supper do thus eat the body and di-ink the blood of Jesus Christ; and we surely believe that he remains in them and they in him, yea, so become flesh of his flesh and bone of his bones, that as the eternal divinity gives life and immortality to the flesh of Jesus Christ, so also, his flesh and blood, when eaten and di'unk by us, confer on us the same privileges.\" ''Behfic Gonf.;' Art. 35. Qdv'ia's ''Institutes;' Bk. iv., Ch. 17, g 10.— \"The sum is, that the flesh and blood of Christ feed our souls just as bread and wine maintain and support our corporeal life. . . But though it seems an incredible thing that the flesh and blood of Christ, while at such a distance from us in respect of place, should be food to us, let us remember how far the secret virtue of the Holy Si^mt surpasses all our conceptions, and how foolish it is to measure its immensity by our feeble capacity. Therefore what our mind does not comprehend, let faith conceive; viz., that the Sjiirit truly unites things separated by space. That sacred communion of flesh and blood whereby Christ transfuses his life into us, just as if it j)enetrated our bones and marrow, he testifies and seals iu his supjier, and that not by presenting a vain or empty sign, but by there exerting an efficacy of the Spirit by which he fulfils what he promises. And truly tlie thing there signified he exhibits and offers to all who sit down at that spiritual feast, although it is beneficially received by believers only.\" '■\"Thirty -nine Articles,\" Art. 28. — \"The Supj^er of the Lord is a sacra- ment of the redemption by Christ's death: insomuch that to such as rightly, worthily, and with faith receive the same, the bread which we break is a partaking of the body of Christ, and likewise the cup of bless- ing is a i^artaking of the blood of Christ. . . The body of Christ is given, taken, and eaten in the Supper only after an heavenly and spii-- itual manner. And the mean whereby the body of Christ is received and eaten in the Supper is faith. The sacrament of the Lord's Sup- per was not by Christ's ordinance reserved, carried about, lifted uji, or worshipjjed. \" \"Heidelberg Cat.,\" Ques. 76. — \"What is it to eat the crucified body of Christ and to drink his shed blood? It means, not only -ftdth thankful hearts to appropriate the passion of Christ, and thereby receive forgive- ness of sins and eternal life, but also and therein, through the Holy Gho.st who dwelleth in Christ and in us, to be more and more united to his blessed body, so that, although he is iu heaven, and we are upon earth, we nevertheless are flesh of his flesh, and bone of his bones, and live forever one spirit with him.\" 650 THE LORD'S SUFFER. \"West. Conf. Faith,\" Ch. 29, § 5.— \"The outward elements in this sacrament, duly set apart to the uses ordained by Christ, have such a relation to him crucified, as that truly, yet sacramentally only, they are sometimes called by the names of the things they i-epreseut, to wit, the body and blood of Christ, albeit in substance and nature they still remain truly and only bread and wine. ^ 7. — Worthy receivers, oiitwardly par- taking of the visible elements in this sacrament, do then also inwardly by faith, really and indeed, but not carnally and corporeally, but spir- itually receive and feed upon Christ crucified and all the benefits of his death : the body and blood of Christ being then not corporeally or car- nally in, with, or under the bread and wine; yet as really but spiritually present to the faith of believers in that ordinance, as the elements them- selves are to the outward senses.\" — See \" Consensus Tigurinus\" in Appendix. APPENDIX. THE CONSENSUS TIGURINUS AND THE FORMULA CONSENSUS HELVETICA. I. THE CONSENSUS TIGURINUS. WRITTEN BY CALVIN, 1549, FOR THE PURPOSE OF UNITING ALL BRANCHES OF THE REFORMED CHURCH IN A COMMON DOCTRINE AS TO THE LORd's SUPPER. HEADS OF CONSENT. TJie whole Spiritual regimen of the Church leads us to Christ. I. Since Christ is the end of the Law, and the knowledge of Him comprehends in itself the entire sum of the Gospel, there is no doubt but that the whole spiritual regimen of the Church is designed to lead us to Christ; as through Him alone we reach God, who is the ultimate end of a blessed (holy) life; and so whoever departs in the least from this truth will never speak rightly or fitly respecting any of the ordi- nances of God. A true Tcnowledge of the Sacraments from, a knowledge of Christ. n. Moreover since the Sacraments are auxiliaries (appendices) of the Gospel, he certainly will discuss both aptly and usefully their nature, theii* power, their office and their fruit, who weaves his discourse from Christ; not merely touching the name of Christ incidentally, but truth- fully holding forth the purj^ose for which He was given to us by the Father, and the benefits which He has conferred upon us. Knoivledge of Christ, what it involves. m. Accordingly it must be held, that Christ, being the eternal Son of God, of the same essence and glory with the Father, jDut on our flesh in order that, by right of adoption, He might communicate to us what by nature was solely His own, to wit, that we should be sons of God. This takes place when we, ingrafted through faith into the body of Christ, and this by the power of the Holy Spirit, are first justified by the gratuitous imputation of righteousness, and then regenerated into a new life, that, new-created in the image of the Heavenly Father, we may put off the old man. 652 APPENDIX. Christ, Priest and King. TV. We must therefore regard Christ in His flesh as a Priest, who has expiated our sins by His death, the only Sacritice, blotted out all our iniquities by His obedieuce, procured for us a perfect righteousness, and now intercedes for us that we may have access to God; as an expia- tory Sacrifice whereby God was reconciled to the world; as a Brut Iter, who from wretched sons of Adam has made us blessed sons of God; as a Restorer (Reparator) , who by the power of His Spirit transforms all that is corrupt [i-iliosum) in us, that we may no longer live unto the world and the flesh, and God himself may Live in us; as a King, who enriches us with every kind of good, governs and preserves us by His power, establishes us \"\\\\'ith spiritual arms, delivers us from every evil, and re- strains and directs us by the sceptre of His mouth; and He is to be so regarded, that He may lift us up to Himself, very God, and to the Father, until that shall be fulfilled which is to be at last, that God be all in ail. How Christ communicates Himself to us. V. Moreover in order that Christ may manifest Himself such a one to us and produce such effects in us, it behooves us to be made one with Him and grow together in His body. For He diifuses His life in us in no other way than by being our Head; \"from whom the whole body fitly joined together, and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the eftectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body \" (Eph. iv. 16). Communion spiritual. Sacraments instituted. VI. This communion which we have with the Son of God, is spiritual; so that He, dAvelling in us by His Spirit, makes all of us who believe partakers of all the good that resides in Him. To bear witness of this, both the preaching of the Gospel and the use of the Sacraments, Holy Baptism and the Holy Supper were instituted. The Ends of the Sacraments. VII. The Sacraments, however, have also these ends: — to be marks and tokens of Christian profession and (Christian) association, or broth- erhood; to incite gratitude (thanksgiving), and to be exercises of faith and a jjious life, in short, bonds (sealed contracts) making these thmgs obligatory. But among other ends this one is chief, that by these Sacraments God attests, presents anew, and seals to ns His grace. For while they indeed signify nothing more than is declared in the word it- self, yet it is no small matter that they are presented to our eyes as lively symbols which better affect our feeling, leading us to the reality [in rem), while they recall to memory Christ's death and all the benefits thereof, in order that faith may have more vigorous exercise; and finally, it is of < no little moment that what was proclaimed to us by the mouth of God, is confirmed and sanctioned by seals. Thanksgiving. VIII. Moreover, since the testimonials and seals of His grace, which the Lord has given us, are verities, surely He himself will beyond all doubt make good to us inwardly, by His Spirit, what the Sacraments symbohze to our eyes and other senses, viz., possession of Christ as the CONSENSUS TIGURINUS. 653 fountain of all blessings, then reconciliation to Gocl by virtiTe of His death, restoration by the Spirit unto holiness of life, and finally attain- ment of righteousness and salvation; accompanied with thanksgiving for these mercies, which were formerly displayed on the cross, and through faith are daily received by us. 77^6 signs and the things signified are not separated, but distinct. IX. Wherefore, though we rightly make a distinction between the signs and the things signified, yet we do not separate the verity from the signs ; but we believe, that all who by faith embrace the jiromises therein oflfered, do spiritually receive Christ and His spiritual gifts, and so also they who have before been made jjartakers of Christ, do continue and renew their communion. Ill the Sacraments the promise is chiefly to he Tcept in view. X. For not to the bare signs, but rather to the i^romise which is annexed to them, it becomes us to look. As far then as our faith ad- vances in the j^romise offered in the Sacraments, so far will this power and efficacy of which we speak exert itself. Accordingly the matter [materia) of the water, bread or wine, by no means present Christ to us, nor makes us partakers of His spii'itual gifts; but we must look rather to the promise, whose office it is to lead us to Christ by the right way of faith, and this faith makes us partakers of Christ. Tlie Eleinents are not to be siipersiitiously worshipped. XI. Hence the error of those who superstitiously worship {obstxpe- scirni) the elements, and rest therein the assurance of their salvation, falls to the ground. For the Sacraments apart from Christ are nothing but emijty masks; and they themselves clearly declare to all this truth, that we must cKng to nothing else but Christ alone, and in nothing else must the free gift of salvation be sought. The Sacraments {per se) have no efficacy. XII. Furthermore, if any benefit is conferred upon us by the Sacra- ments, this does not proceed from any virtue of their own, even though the promise whereby they are distinguished be included. For it is God alone who works by His Spirit. And in using the instrumentality of the Sacraments, He thereby neither infuses into them His own power, nor abates in the least the efficiency of His Spirit; but in accordance with the capacity of our ignorance [ruditas) He uses them as instriiments in siich a way that the whole efficiency [facultas ageiidi) remains solely with HimseK. God uses the instrument but in such a loay that all the poioer [virtus) is His. Xiii. Therefore, as Paul advises us that \"neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth, but God that giveth the increase \" (1 Cor. iii. 7) ; so also it may be said of the Sacraments, that they are nothing, for they will be of no avail except God work the whole to com- pletion [in solii/um omnia etficint). They are indeed instruments with which God works efficiently, when it pleases Him, but in such a manner that the whole work of our salvation must be credited solely to Him. XIV. We have therefore decided that it is solely Christ who verily bai^tizes us within, who makes us partakers of Him in the Supper, who, 654 APPENDIX. in fine, fulfils what the Sacraments symbolize, and so uses indeed, these instruments, that the whole efficiency resides in His Spirit. How the Sacraments confirm. XV. So the Sacraments are sometimes called seals, are said to nour- ish, confirm, and promote faith; and yet the Spirit alone is properly the seal, and the same Spirit is the originator and perfecter of our faith. For all these attributes of the Sacraments occupy a subordinate place, so that not even the least portion of the work of our salvation is trans- ferred from its sole author to either the creature or the elements. Not all who jyarticipnte in the Sacraments partake also of the verity. XVI. Moreover, we sedulously teach that God does not exert His power promiscuously in all who receive the Sacraments, but only in the elect. For just as he enlightens unto faith none but those whom He has foreordained unto life, so by the hidden power of His spirit He causes only the elect to receive what the Sacraments offer. The Sacraments do not confer grace. XVII. This doctrine refutes that invention of sophists which teaches that the Sacraments of the New Covenant confer grace on all who do not interpose the impediment of a mortal sin. For besides the truth that nothing is received in the Sacraments except by faith, it is also to be held that God's grace is not in the least so linked to the Sacraments themselves that whoever has the sign possesses also the reality {res) ; for the signs are administered to the re^srobate as well as to the elect, but the verity of the signs comes only to the latter. GocVs gifts are offered to all; believers alone receive them,. XVHI. It is indeed certain that Christ and His gifts [dona) are offered to all alike, and that the verity of God is not so impaired by the unbelief of men that the Sacraments do not always retain their proper virtue {vim); but all persons are not capable of receiving Christ and His gifts (dona). Therefore on God's part there is no vai'iableness, but on the part of men each one receives according to the measure of his faith. Believers have communion with Christ, before and loitlwut the nse of the Sacraments. XIX. Moreover, as the use of the Sacraments confers on unbelievers nothing more than if they had abstained therefrom, indeed, is only per- nicious to them ; so without their use the verity which they symbolize endures to those who believe. Thus in Baptism were washed away Paul's sins, which had already been washed away before. Thus also BaiJtism was to Cornelius the washing of regeneration, and yet he had already received the gift of the Holy Spirit. So in the Supi^er Christ communicates himself to us, and yet He imparted himself to us before, and abides continually in us forever. For since each one is commanded to examine himself, it hence follows that faith is required of each before he comes to the Sa(^raments. And yet there is no faith without Christ; but in so far as in the Sacraments faith is confirmed and grows, God's gifts are confirmed in us, and so in a measure Christ grows in us and we in Him. CONSENSUS TIGURINUS. 655 Grace is not so joined to the act of the Sacraments, that their fruit is received immediately after the act. XX. The benefit also which we derive from the Sacraments should by no means be restricted to the time in which they are administered to us; just as if the visible sign when brought forward into view, did at the same moment with itself bring God's grace. For those who are baptized in early infancy, God regenerates in boyhood, in budding youth, and sometimes even in old age. So the benefit of Baptism lies oiien to the whole course of life; for the promise which it contains is i^erpetually valid. It may, also, sometimes happen, that a partaking of the Supper, which in the act itself brought us little good because of our inconsider- ateness or dullness, afterward brings forth its fruit. Local imagination should be suppressed. XXI. Especially should every conception of local (bodily) presence be suppressed. For while the signs are here in the world seen by the eyes, and felt by the hands, Christ, in so far as He is man, we must con- template as in no other place but heaven, and seek Him in no other way than with the mind and faith's understanding. Wherefore it is a pre- posterous and impious superstition to enclose Him under elements of this world. Exposition of the words of the Lord's Supper, \" Tliis is my body.\" XXn. We therefore repudiate as absurd interpreters, those who urge the precise literal sense, as they say, of the customary words in the Supper, \"This is my body,\" \"This is my blood.\" For we place it be- yond all controversy that these words are to be understood figuratively, so that the bread and the wine are said to be that which they signify. And verily it ought not to seem novel or unusual that the name of the thing signified be transferred by metonomy to the sign, for expressions of this kind are scattered throughout the Scriptures; and saying this we assert nothing that does not ijlainly appear in all the oldest and most approved writers of the Church. Concerning the eating of the body of Christ. XXm. Moreover, that Christ, through faith by the j)ower of His Holy Spirit, feeds our souls with the eating of His flesh and the drinking of His blood, is not to be understood as if any commingling or transfu- sion of substance occurred, but as meaning that from flesh once oiiered in sacrifice and blood once poured out in expiation we derive life. Against Transubstantiation and other silly conceits. XXTV. In this way not only is the invention of Papists about tran- siibstantiation refuted, but also all the gross fictions and futile subtleties which are either derogatory to His divine gloiy or inconsistent with the verity of His human nature. For we consider it no less absurd to locate Christ under the bread, or conjoin Him with the bread, than to transub- stantiate the bread into His body. Christ's body is in heaven as in a place. '**'^ XXV. But in order that no ambiguity may remain, when we say that Christ should be contemplated as in heaven, the phrase implies and ex- presses a difference of place (a distance between places). For though, G56 APPENDIX. philosophically speaking, \"above the heavens\" is not a locality, yet because the body of Christ — as the nature and the limitation of the human body show — is finite, and is contained in heaven as in a place, it is therefore necessarily separated from us by as great an interval as lies between heaven and earth. Christ is not to be ^i^orsliipped in the bread. XXVI. But if it is not right for us in imagination to affix Christ to the bread and wine, much less is it lawful to worship Him in the bread. For though the bread is presented to us as a symbol Snd pledge of our communion with Christ, yet because it is the sign, not the reality, neither has the reality enclosed in it or affixed to it, they therefore who bend their minds upon it to worship Christ, make it an idol. II. FORMULA CONSENSUS HELVETICA. COMPOSED AT ZURICH, A. D. 1675, BY JOHN HENRY HEIDEGGER, OF ZURICH, ASSISTED BY FRANCIS TURRETINE, OF GENEVA, AND LUKE GERNLER, OF BASLE, AND DESIGNED TO CONDEMN AND EXCLUDE THAT MODIFIED FORM OF CALVINISM, WHICH, IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY, EMA- NATED FROM THE THEOLOGICAL SCHOOL AT SAUMUR, REPRESENTED BYAMYRAULT, PLAC^US, AND DAILLE ; ENTITLED \"FORM OF AGREEMENT OF THE HELVETIC REFORMED CHURCHES RESPECTING THE DOCTRINE OP UNIVERSAL GRACE, THE DOCTRINES CONNECTED THEREWITH, AND SOME OTHER POINTS.\" CANONS. I. God, the Supreme Judge, not only took care to have His word, which is the \" power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth \" ^Kom. i. 16), committed to writing by Moses, the Prophets, and the Apostles, but has also watched and cherished it with j^aternal care ever since it was written up to the present time, so that it could not be cor- rupted by craft of Satan or fraud of man. Therefore the Church justly ascribes it to His singular grace and goodness that she has, and will have to the end of the world, a \" sure word of prophecy \" and \" Holy Script- ures\" (2 Tim. iii. 15), from which, though heaven and earth perish, \"one jot or one tittle shall in no Avise pass \" (Matt. v. 18). II. But, in particular, the Hebrew Original of the Old Testament, which we have received and to this day do retain as handed down by the Jewish Church, unto whom formerly \"were committed the oracles of God \" (Rom. iii. 2), is, not only in its consonants, but in its vowels — either the vowel points themselves, or at least the power of the points — not only in its matter, but in its words, inspired of God, thus foi-ming, FORMULA CONSENSUS HELVETICA. 657 together witli tlie Original of the New Testament, the sole and complete rule of our faith and life; and to its standard, as to a Lydian stone, all extant versions, oriental and occidental, ought to be apj)lied, and where- ever they differ, be conformed. III. Therefore we can by no means approve the opinion of those who declare that the text which the Hebrew Original exhibits was deter- mined by man's -will alone, and do not scruple at all to remodel a Hebrew reading which they consider unsuitable, and amend it from the Greek Versions of the LXX and others, the Samaritan Pentateuch, the Chaldee Targums, or even from other sources, yea, sometimes from their own reason alone; and furthermore, they do not acknowledge any other read- ing to be genuine except that which can be educed by the critical power of the human judgment from the collation of editions with each other and with the various readings of the Hebrew Original itself — which, they maintain, has been corrupted in various ways; and finally, they affirm that besides the Hebrew edition of the present time, there are in the Versions of the ancient interjareters which differ from our Hebrew con- text other Hebrew Originals, since these Versions are also indicative of ancient Hebrew Originals differing from each other. Thus they bring the foundation of our faith and its in\\dolable authority into perilous hazard. IV. Before the foundation of the world God purposed in Christ Jesus, our Lord, an eternal purpose (Eph. iii. 11), in which, from the mere good pleasure of His own will, without any prevision of the merit of works or of faith, unto the praise of His glorious grace, out of the hiiman race lying in the same mass of corruption and of common blood, and, there- fore, corrupted by sin, He elected n certain and definite nnmher to be led, in time, unto salvation by Christ, their Surety and sole Mediator, and on account of His merit, by the mighty power of the regenerating Holy Spirit, to be effectually called, regenerated, and gifted with faith and repentance. So, indeed, God, determining to illustrate His glory, de- creed to create man perfect, in the first place, then, permit him to fall, and at length pity some of the fallen, and therefore elect those, but leave the rest in the corrupt mass, and finally give them over to eternal destruction. V. In that gi-acious decree of Divine Election, moreover, Christ him- self is also included, not as the meritorious cause, or foundation anterior to Election itself, but as being Himself also elect (1 Peter ii. 4, 6), fore- known before the foundation of the world, and accordingly, as the first requisite of the execution of the decree of Election, chosen Mediator, and our first born Brother, whose precious merit God determined to use for the purpose of conferring, without detriment to His own justice, salva- tion upon us. For the Holy Scriptiires not only declare that Election was made according to the mere good pleasure of the Divine counsel and will (Eph. i. 5, 9; Matt. xi. 26), but also make the appointment and giv- ing of Christ, our Mediator, to proceed from the strenuous love of God the Father toward tbe world of the elect. VI. Wherefore we can not give suffrage to the opinion of those who teach: — (1) that God, moved by philanthropy, or a sort of special love for the fallen human race, to previouii election, did, in a kind of condi- tioned willing — willingness — first moving of pity, as they call it — ineffi- cacious desire — jjurpose the salvation of all and each, at least, condition- ally, i. e., if they would believe; (2) that He appointed Christ Mediator for all and each of the fallen; and (3) that, at length, certain ones whom He regarded, not simply as sinners in the first Adam, but as redeemed 42 658 APPENDIX. in tlie second Adam, He elected, i. e., He determined to graciously be- stow on these, in time, the saving gift of faith; and in this sole act Elec- tion properly so called is complete. For these and all other kindred teachings are in no wise insignificant deviations from the form of sound words respecting Divine Election; because the Scriptures do not extend unto all and each God's purpose of showing mercy to man, but restrict it to the elect alone, the reprobate being excluded, even by name, as Esau, whom God hated with an eternal hatred (Rom. ix. 10-13). The same Holy Scrij^tures testify that the counsel and the will of God change not, but stand immovable, and God in the heavens doeth whatsoever he will (Ps. cxv. 3; Isa. xlvi. 10); for God is infinitely removed from all that human imperfection which characterizes inefficacious affections and de- sires, rashness, repentance, and change of purpose. The appointment, also, of Christ, as Mediator, equally with the salvation of those who were given to Him for a possession and an inheritance that can not be taken aAvay, proceeds from one and the same Election, and does not underly Election as its foundation. VII. As all His works were known unto God from eternity (Acts xv. 18), so in time, according to His infinite poAver, wisdom, and goodness, He made man, the glory and end of His works, in His own image, and, therefore, upright, wine, and just. Him, thus constituted. He put under the Covenant of Works, and in this Covenant freely promised him com- munion with God, favor, and life, if indeed he acted in obedience to His will. VIII. Moreover that promise annexed to the Covenant of Works was not a continuation only of earthly life and happiness, but the possession especially of life eternal and celestial, a life, namely, of both body and soul in heaven — if indeed man ran the course of perfect obedience — with unspeakable joy in communion with God. Eor not only did the Tree of Life prefigure this very thing unto Adam, but the power of the law, wliich, being fulfilled by Christ, who went tinder it in our stead, awards to us no other than celestial life in Christ who kept the righteousness of the law (Rom. ii. 26), manifestly proves the same, as also the opposite threatening of death Ijoth temporal and eternal. IX. Wherefore we can not assent to the opinion of those who deny that a reward of lieavenly bliss was proifered to Adam on condition of obedience to God, and do not admit that the promise of the Covenant of Works was any thing more than a promise of peri^etual life abound- ing in every kind of good that can be suited to the body and soul of man in a state of perfect nature, and the enjoyment thereof in an eartldy Paradise. For this also is contrary to the sound sense of the Divine Word, and weakens the power [potestas) of the law in itself considered. X. As, however, God entered into the Covenant of Works not only ■with Adam for himself, but also, in him as the head and root [sfirps), with the whole human race, who would, by virtue of, the blessing of the nature derived from him, inherit also the same perfection, provided he continued therein; so Adam by his mournful fall, not only for himself, but also for the whole human race that would be born of bloods and the will of the flesh, sinned and lost the benefits promised in the Covenant. We hold, therefore, that the sin of Adam is imputed by the mysterious and just judgment of God to all his posterity. For the Apostle testifies that ui Addni all sinned, by one man's disobedience VKtuy were made sinners (Rom. V. 12, 19), and in Adam all die (1 Cor. xv. 21, 22). But there appears no way in which here(.litary conniption could fall, as a sj)iritual FORMULA CONSENSUS HELVETICA. 659 death, upon the whole human race by the just judgment of God, unless some sin [delictum) of that race preceded, incurring {iitducens) the penalty [reatum, guilt) of that death. For God, the supremely just Judge of all the eai'th, punishes none bat the guilty. XL For a double reason, therefore, man, because of sin [pnttt ppccatnm) is by nature, and hence from his birth, before committing any actual sin, exposed to God's wrath and curse ; first, on account of the transgression and disobedience which he committed in the loins of Adam; and, sec- ondly, on account of the consequent hereditary coi-ruptiou implanted in his very conception, whereby his whole nature is depraved and spir- itually dead; so that original sin may rightly be regarded as twofold, viz., impided sill and iiiliereai liereditnri/ sia. XII. Accordingly we can not, without harm to Divine truth, give assent to those who deny that Adam represented his posterity by appoint- ment of God, and that his sin is imputed, therefore, hnviedidleli/ to his posterity; and under the term impufntinn medtdle and confte(p(pid not only destroy the imputation of the tirst sin, but also expose the doctrine [assertin) of hereditary corruption to great danger. XIII. As Christ was from eternity elected the Head, Prince, and Lord [Hfpres) of all who, in time, are saved by His grace, so also, in time, He was made Surety of the New Covenant only for those who, by the eternal Election, were given to Him as His own people (popnlas pecidii), His seed and inheritance. For according to the determinate counsel of the Father and His own intention. He encountered dreadful death instead of the elect alone, restored only these into the bosom of the Father's grace, and these only he reconciled to God, the offended Father, and delivered from the curse of the law. For our Jesus saves His people ivom their sins (Matt. i. 21), who gave His life a ransom for 7naat/ sheep (Matt. xx. 28; John x. 15), His own, who hear His voice (John X. 27, 28), and for these only He also intercedes, as a divinely appointed Priest, and not for the world (John xvii. 9). Accordingly in the death of Christ, only tlie elect, who in time are made new creatures (2 Cor. v. 17), and for whom Christ in His death was substituted as an expiatory sacrifice, are regarded as having died with Him and as being justified from sin; and thus, with the counsel of the Father who gave to Christ none but the elect to be redeemed, and also with the working of the Holy Spirit, who sanctifies and seals unto a living hoj)e of eternal life none but the elect, the Avill of Christ who died so agrees and ami- cably conspires in perfect harmony, that the sphere of the Father's election {Patris elif/entis), the Son's redemption [FUii redimerdis), and the Spirit's sanctification [Spiribis S. sdiidifivHidis) is one and the same [(cqwdis pateat). XIV. This very thing further appears in this also, that Christ merited for those in whose stead He died the means of snlv<(lion, especially the regenerating Spirit and the heavenly gift of fai<:h, as well as salvation itself, and actually confers these upon them. For the Scriptures testify that Chi'ist, the Lord, came U> sure die lost sheep of die house of Israel (Matt. XV. 24), and sends the same Holy Spirit, the fount of regenera- tion, as His own (John xvi. 7, 8) ; that among the better in-omises of the New Covenant of which He was made Mediator and Surety this one is pre-eminent, that He null irrite His law, i. e., the law of faith, in the hearts of his people (Heb. viii. 10); that whatsoever the Father has given to Christ will come to Him, by faith, surely; and finally, that we are chof^en in Christ to be holy and without blame, and, moreover, children hi/ Him (Eph. i. 4, 5); but our being holy and children of God proceeds only from faith and the Spirit of regeneration. 660 APPENDIX. XV. But hy the obedience of his death Christ instead of the elect so satisfied God the Father, that in the estimate, nevertheless, of His vica- rious righteousness and of that obedience, all of that Avhich He rendered to the law, as its just servant, during the whole course of His life, whether by doing or by suflering, ought to be called obedience. For Christ's Hfe, according to the Aj)ostle's testimony (Philip, ii. 7, 8), was nothing but a continuous emptying of self, submission and humiUatiou, descending step by step to the very lowest extreme, even the death of the Cross; and the Spirit of God plainly declares that Christ in our stead satisfied the law and Divine justice by His most holy life, and makes that ransom with which God has redeemed us to consist not in His suft'erings only, but in His whole life conformed to the law. The Spirit, however, ascribes our redemj^tion to the death, or the blood, of Christ, in no other sense than that it was consummated by sufferings; and from that last terminating and grandest act derives a name [denomirKdlnnpm facit) indeed, but in such a way as by no means to separate the life preceding from His death. XVI. Since all these things are entirely so, surely we can not approve the contrary doctrine of those who affirm that of His own intention, by His own counsel and that of the Father who sent Him, Christ died for all and each upon the impossible condition, provided they believe; that He obtained for all a salvation, which, nevertheless, is not ai3plied to all, and by His death merited salvation and faith for no one individually and certainly [proprie et adu), but only removed the obstacle of Divine justice, and acquired for the Father the liberty of entering into a new covenant of grace with all men; and finally, they so sejaarate the active and passive righteousness of Christ, as to assert that He claims His nctive righteoi;s- ness for himself as His own, but gives and imj^utes only His passive righteousness to the elect. All these opinions, and aU that are like these, are contrary to the plain Scriptures and the glory of Christ, who is Author and Fodslier oi our faith and salvation; they make His cross of none effect, and under the appearance of augmenting His merit, they reaUy diminish it. XVII. The call unto salvation was suited to its due time (1 Tim. ii. 6) ; since by God's will it was at one time more restricted, at another, more extended and general, but never absolutely universal. For, indeed, in the Old Testament God showed His u'ord unto Jacob, His statutes and His judfimeuts unto Israel ; He dealt not so with any nation (Ps. cxlvii. 19, 20). In the New Testament, ])eace being made in the blood of Christ and the inner wall of jjartition broken down, God so extended the limits [pomoeria) of Gospel preaching and the external call, that there is no longer any difference betu-een the Jew and die Greek ; for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call vpon Him (Ptom. x. 12). But not even thus is the call universal; for Christ testifies that many are called (Matt. xx. 16), not all; and when Paul and Timothy essayed to go into Bithynia to preach the Gospel, the Spirit suffered them not (Acts xvi. 7); and there have ))een and there are to-day, as exjierience testifies, innumerable myriads of men to whom Christ is not known even by rumor. \" XVIIT. Meanwhile God left not himself icidtout vilncss (Acts xiv. 17) unto those whom He refused to call by His \"Word unto salvation. For He divided unto them the spectacle of the heavens and the stars (Deut. iv. 19), and that which may be known of God, even from the works of nature and Providence, He hath showed nnto them (Rom. i. 19), for the pui-jiose of attesting His long sufi\"eri]iig. Yet it is not to be affirmed that the works of nature and Divine Providence were means {organa), suffi- FORMULA CONSENSUS HELVETICA. 661 cient of themselves and fulfilling the function of the external call, where- by He Avould reveal unto them the mystery of the good pleasure or mercy of God in Christ. For the Apostle immediately adds (Rom. i. 20), \"The invisible things of Him from the creation are clearly seen, being under- stood by the things that are made, even His eter mil power and Godhead;'''' not His hidden good pleasure in Christ, and not even to the end that thence they might learn the mystery of salvation through Christ, but that they might be wilhoid excuse, because they did not use aright the knowledge that was left them, but when they knew God, they glorified Him not as God, neither were thankful. Wherefore also Christ glorifies God, His Father, because He had hidden these things from the wise and the pru- dent, and revealed them unto b(d)es (Matt. xi. 25); and the Apostle teaches, moreover, that God has made known unto us the mystery of His will according to His good pleasure which He hath purposed in Himself [in Christo), (Eph. i. 9). XIX. Likewise the external call itself, which is made by the i^reach- ing of the Gospel, is on the part of God also, who calls, earnest and sin- cere. For in His Word He unfolds earnestly and most truly, not, indeed. His secret intention respecting the salvation or destruction of each indi- vidual, but what belongs to our duty, and what remains for lis if we do or neglect this duty. Clearly it is the will of God who calls, that they who are called come to Him and not neglect so great salvation, and so He promises eternal life also in good earnest, to those who come to Him by faith; for, as the Apostle declares, \"it is a faithful saying: — For if we be dead with Him, we shall also live with Him; if we suifer, we shall also reign mth Him; if we deny Him, He also will deny us; if we believe not, yet He abideth faithful; He can not deny Himself.\" Nor in regard to those who do not obey the call is this will inefficacious; for God always attains that which He intends in His will (quod rolens inlendit), even the demonstration of duty, and following this, either the salvation of the elect who do their duty, or the inexcusableness of the rest who neglect the duty set before them. Surely the spiritual man in no way secures [conciliat) the internal jjurpose of God to produce faith {conceptum Dei internum, fidei analogum) along with the externally proifered, or written Word of God. Moreover, because God api^roved every verity which flows from His counsel, therefore it is rightly said to be His will, that all who see the Son and believe on Him inay have everlasting life (John vi. 40). Although these \" all \" are the elect alone, and God formed no i^lan of universal salvation without any selection of persons, and Christ there- fore died not for every one but for the elect only who were given tb Him; yet He intends this in any case to be universally true, which follows from His special and definite purpose. But that, by God's will, the elect alone believe in the external call thus universally profi'ered, while the repro- bate are hardened, proceeds solely from the discriminating grace of God: election by the same grace to them that believe; but their own native wickedness to the reprobate who remain in sin, and after their hard- ness and impenitent heart treasure up unto themselves wrath against the day of wrath, and revelation of the righteous judgment of God (Rom. ii. 5). XX. Accordingly we have no doubt that they err who hold that the call unto salvation is disclosed not by the i)reaching of the Gos]pel solely, but even by the works of nature and Providence without any further proclamation; adding, that the call unto salvation is so indefinite and universal that there is no mortal who is not, at least objectively, as they say, sufl&ciently called either med'tately, namely, in that God will further 662 APPENDIX. bestow the light of grace on hina who rightly uses the light of nature, or immedudfh/, unto Christ and salvation; and finally denying that the ex- ternal call can be said to be serious and true, or the candor and sincerity of God be defended, without asserting the absolute universality of grace. For such doctrines are contrary to the Holy Scrijitures and the experi- ence of all ages, and manifestly confound nature with grace, that wliich may be known of God with His hidden wisdom, the light of reason, in fine, with the light of Divine Revelation. XXI. They who are called unto salvation through the preaching of the Gospel can neither believe nor obey the call, unless they are raised up out of spiritual death by that vei*y power whereby God commanded the light to shine out of darkness, and God shines into their hearts with the soul-swaying grace of His Spirit, to give tlie liyht of the knoidedge of the glory of God hi thefice of Jesus Christ (2 Cor. iv. 6). For the natural man receiveth not tli.e tilings of the Spirit of God; for theii are foolishness unto him: neither can lie know them, because they are spiritually discerned (1 Cor. ii. 14) ; and this utter inability the Scripture demonstrates by so many direct testimonies and under so many emblems that scarcely in any other point is it surer [locupletior). This inability may, indeed, be called moral even in so far as it jjertains to a moral subject or object; but it ought at the same time to be also called natural, inasmuch as man by nature, and so by the law of his formation in the womb, and hence from his birth, is the child of disobedience (Eph. ii. 2); and has that inability so innate (con- genitam) that it can be shaken off in no way except by the omnipotent heart-turning grace of the Holy Sjjirit. XXII. We hold therefore that they sj^eak with too little accuracy and not without danger, who call this inability to believe moral inability, and do not hold it to be n