mevol's picture
Upload 85 files
47996cc
anno_start anno_end anno_text entity_type sentence section
0 17 Crystal structure evidence Crystal structure of SEL1L: Insight into the roles of SLR motifs in ERAD pathway TITLE
21 26 SEL1L protein Crystal structure of SEL1L: Insight into the roles of SLR motifs in ERAD pathway TITLE
54 57 SLR structure_element Crystal structure of SEL1L: Insight into the roles of SLR motifs in ERAD pathway TITLE
0 5 SEL1L protein SEL1L, a component of the ERAD machinery, plays an important role in selecting and transporting ERAD substrates for degradation. ABSTRACT
23 40 crystal structure evidence We have determined the crystal structure of the mouse SEL1L central domain comprising five Sel1-Like Repeats (SLR motifs 5 to 9; hereafter called SEL1Lcent). ABSTRACT
48 53 mouse taxonomy_domain We have determined the crystal structure of the mouse SEL1L central domain comprising five Sel1-Like Repeats (SLR motifs 5 to 9; hereafter called SEL1Lcent). ABSTRACT
54 59 SEL1L protein We have determined the crystal structure of the mouse SEL1L central domain comprising five Sel1-Like Repeats (SLR motifs 5 to 9; hereafter called SEL1Lcent). ABSTRACT
60 74 central domain structure_element We have determined the crystal structure of the mouse SEL1L central domain comprising five Sel1-Like Repeats (SLR motifs 5 to 9; hereafter called SEL1Lcent). ABSTRACT
91 108 Sel1-Like Repeats structure_element We have determined the crystal structure of the mouse SEL1L central domain comprising five Sel1-Like Repeats (SLR motifs 5 to 9; hereafter called SEL1Lcent). ABSTRACT
110 127 SLR motifs 5 to 9 structure_element We have determined the crystal structure of the mouse SEL1L central domain comprising five Sel1-Like Repeats (SLR motifs 5 to 9; hereafter called SEL1Lcent). ABSTRACT
146 155 SEL1Lcent structure_element We have determined the crystal structure of the mouse SEL1L central domain comprising five Sel1-Like Repeats (SLR motifs 5 to 9; hereafter called SEL1Lcent). ABSTRACT
12 21 SEL1Lcent structure_element Strikingly, SEL1Lcent forms a homodimer with two-fold symmetry in a head-to-tail manner. ABSTRACT
30 39 homodimer oligomeric_state Strikingly, SEL1Lcent forms a homodimer with two-fold symmetry in a head-to-tail manner. ABSTRACT
68 80 head-to-tail protein_state Strikingly, SEL1Lcent forms a homodimer with two-fold symmetry in a head-to-tail manner. ABSTRACT
18 29 SLR motif 9 structure_element Particularly, the SLR motif 9 plays an important role in dimer formation by adopting a domain-swapped structure and providing an extensive dimeric interface. ABSTRACT
57 62 dimer oligomeric_state Particularly, the SLR motif 9 plays an important role in dimer formation by adopting a domain-swapped structure and providing an extensive dimeric interface. ABSTRACT
87 101 domain-swapped protein_state Particularly, the SLR motif 9 plays an important role in dimer formation by adopting a domain-swapped structure and providing an extensive dimeric interface. ABSTRACT
139 156 dimeric interface site Particularly, the SLR motif 9 plays an important role in dimer formation by adopting a domain-swapped structure and providing an extensive dimeric interface. ABSTRACT
23 34 full-length protein_state We identified that the full-length SEL1L forms a self-oligomer through the SEL1Lcent domain in mammalian cells. ABSTRACT
35 40 SEL1L protein We identified that the full-length SEL1L forms a self-oligomer through the SEL1Lcent domain in mammalian cells. ABSTRACT
49 62 self-oligomer oligomeric_state We identified that the full-length SEL1L forms a self-oligomer through the SEL1Lcent domain in mammalian cells. ABSTRACT
75 84 SEL1Lcent structure_element We identified that the full-length SEL1L forms a self-oligomer through the SEL1Lcent domain in mammalian cells. ABSTRACT
95 104 mammalian taxonomy_domain We identified that the full-length SEL1L forms a self-oligomer through the SEL1Lcent domain in mammalian cells. ABSTRACT
36 41 SLR-C structure_element Furthermore, we discovered that the SLR-C, comprising SLR motifs 10 and 11, of SEL1L directly interacts with the N-terminus luminal loops of HRD1. ABSTRACT
54 74 SLR motifs 10 and 11 structure_element Furthermore, we discovered that the SLR-C, comprising SLR motifs 10 and 11, of SEL1L directly interacts with the N-terminus luminal loops of HRD1. ABSTRACT
79 84 SEL1L protein Furthermore, we discovered that the SLR-C, comprising SLR motifs 10 and 11, of SEL1L directly interacts with the N-terminus luminal loops of HRD1. ABSTRACT
124 137 luminal loops structure_element Furthermore, we discovered that the SLR-C, comprising SLR motifs 10 and 11, of SEL1L directly interacts with the N-terminus luminal loops of HRD1. ABSTRACT
141 145 HRD1 protein Furthermore, we discovered that the SLR-C, comprising SLR motifs 10 and 11, of SEL1L directly interacts with the N-terminus luminal loops of HRD1. ABSTRACT
35 38 SLR structure_element Therefore, we propose that certain SLR motifs of SEL1L play a unique role in membrane bound ERAD machinery. ABSTRACT
49 54 SEL1L protein Therefore, we propose that certain SLR motifs of SEL1L play a unique role in membrane bound ERAD machinery. ABSTRACT
114 124 eukaryotes taxonomy_domain Protein quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is essential for maintenance of cellular homeostasis in eukaryotes and is implicated in many severe diseases. INTRO
105 122 polyubiquitinated protein_state Terminally misfolded proteins in the lumen or membrane of the ER are retrotranslocated into the cytosol, polyubiquitinated, and degraded by the proteasome. INTRO
144 154 proteasome complex_assembly Terminally misfolded proteins in the lumen or membrane of the ER are retrotranslocated into the cytosol, polyubiquitinated, and degraded by the proteasome. INTRO
70 79 conserved protein_state The process is called ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD) and is conserved in all eukaryotes. INTRO
87 97 eukaryotes taxonomy_domain The process is called ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD) and is conserved in all eukaryotes. INTRO
72 76 HRD1 protein Accumulating studies have identified key components for ERAD, including HRD1, SEL1L (Hrd3p), Derlin-1, -2, -3 (Der1p), HERP-1, -2 (Usa1p), OS9 (Yos9), XTP-B, and Grp94, all of which are involved in the recognition and translocation of the ERAD substrates in yeast and metazoans. INTRO
78 83 SEL1L protein Accumulating studies have identified key components for ERAD, including HRD1, SEL1L (Hrd3p), Derlin-1, -2, -3 (Der1p), HERP-1, -2 (Usa1p), OS9 (Yos9), XTP-B, and Grp94, all of which are involved in the recognition and translocation of the ERAD substrates in yeast and metazoans. INTRO
85 90 Hrd3p protein Accumulating studies have identified key components for ERAD, including HRD1, SEL1L (Hrd3p), Derlin-1, -2, -3 (Der1p), HERP-1, -2 (Usa1p), OS9 (Yos9), XTP-B, and Grp94, all of which are involved in the recognition and translocation of the ERAD substrates in yeast and metazoans. INTRO
93 109 Derlin-1, -2, -3 protein Accumulating studies have identified key components for ERAD, including HRD1, SEL1L (Hrd3p), Derlin-1, -2, -3 (Der1p), HERP-1, -2 (Usa1p), OS9 (Yos9), XTP-B, and Grp94, all of which are involved in the recognition and translocation of the ERAD substrates in yeast and metazoans. INTRO
111 116 Der1p protein Accumulating studies have identified key components for ERAD, including HRD1, SEL1L (Hrd3p), Derlin-1, -2, -3 (Der1p), HERP-1, -2 (Usa1p), OS9 (Yos9), XTP-B, and Grp94, all of which are involved in the recognition and translocation of the ERAD substrates in yeast and metazoans. INTRO
119 129 HERP-1, -2 protein Accumulating studies have identified key components for ERAD, including HRD1, SEL1L (Hrd3p), Derlin-1, -2, -3 (Der1p), HERP-1, -2 (Usa1p), OS9 (Yos9), XTP-B, and Grp94, all of which are involved in the recognition and translocation of the ERAD substrates in yeast and metazoans. INTRO
131 136 Usa1p protein Accumulating studies have identified key components for ERAD, including HRD1, SEL1L (Hrd3p), Derlin-1, -2, -3 (Der1p), HERP-1, -2 (Usa1p), OS9 (Yos9), XTP-B, and Grp94, all of which are involved in the recognition and translocation of the ERAD substrates in yeast and metazoans. INTRO
139 142 OS9 protein Accumulating studies have identified key components for ERAD, including HRD1, SEL1L (Hrd3p), Derlin-1, -2, -3 (Der1p), HERP-1, -2 (Usa1p), OS9 (Yos9), XTP-B, and Grp94, all of which are involved in the recognition and translocation of the ERAD substrates in yeast and metazoans. INTRO
144 148 Yos9 protein Accumulating studies have identified key components for ERAD, including HRD1, SEL1L (Hrd3p), Derlin-1, -2, -3 (Der1p), HERP-1, -2 (Usa1p), OS9 (Yos9), XTP-B, and Grp94, all of which are involved in the recognition and translocation of the ERAD substrates in yeast and metazoans. INTRO
151 156 XTP-B protein Accumulating studies have identified key components for ERAD, including HRD1, SEL1L (Hrd3p), Derlin-1, -2, -3 (Der1p), HERP-1, -2 (Usa1p), OS9 (Yos9), XTP-B, and Grp94, all of which are involved in the recognition and translocation of the ERAD substrates in yeast and metazoans. INTRO
162 167 Grp94 protein Accumulating studies have identified key components for ERAD, including HRD1, SEL1L (Hrd3p), Derlin-1, -2, -3 (Der1p), HERP-1, -2 (Usa1p), OS9 (Yos9), XTP-B, and Grp94, all of which are involved in the recognition and translocation of the ERAD substrates in yeast and metazoans. INTRO
258 263 yeast taxonomy_domain Accumulating studies have identified key components for ERAD, including HRD1, SEL1L (Hrd3p), Derlin-1, -2, -3 (Der1p), HERP-1, -2 (Usa1p), OS9 (Yos9), XTP-B, and Grp94, all of which are involved in the recognition and translocation of the ERAD substrates in yeast and metazoans. INTRO
268 277 metazoans taxonomy_domain Accumulating studies have identified key components for ERAD, including HRD1, SEL1L (Hrd3p), Derlin-1, -2, -3 (Der1p), HERP-1, -2 (Usa1p), OS9 (Yos9), XTP-B, and Grp94, all of which are involved in the recognition and translocation of the ERAD substrates in yeast and metazoans. INTRO
0 5 Yeast taxonomy_domain Yeast ERAD components, which have been extensively characterized through genetic and biochemical studies, are comparable with mammalian ERAD components, sharing similar molecular functions and structural composition. INTRO
73 104 genetic and biochemical studies experimental_method Yeast ERAD components, which have been extensively characterized through genetic and biochemical studies, are comparable with mammalian ERAD components, sharing similar molecular functions and structural composition. INTRO
126 135 mammalian taxonomy_domain Yeast ERAD components, which have been extensively characterized through genetic and biochemical studies, are comparable with mammalian ERAD components, sharing similar molecular functions and structural composition. INTRO
4 8 HRD1 protein The HRD1 E3 ubiquitin ligase, which is embedded in the ER membrane, is involved in translocating ERAD substrates across the ER membrane and catalyzing substrate ubiquitination via its cytosolic RING finger domain. INTRO
9 28 E3 ubiquitin ligase protein_type The HRD1 E3 ubiquitin ligase, which is embedded in the ER membrane, is involved in translocating ERAD substrates across the ER membrane and catalyzing substrate ubiquitination via its cytosolic RING finger domain. INTRO
194 212 RING finger domain structure_element The HRD1 E3 ubiquitin ligase, which is embedded in the ER membrane, is involved in translocating ERAD substrates across the ER membrane and catalyzing substrate ubiquitination via its cytosolic RING finger domain. INTRO
0 5 SEL1L protein SEL1L, the mammalian homolog of Hrd3p, associates with HRD1, mediates HRD1 interactions with the ER luminal lectin OS9, and recognizes substrates to be degraded. INTRO
11 20 mammalian taxonomy_domain SEL1L, the mammalian homolog of Hrd3p, associates with HRD1, mediates HRD1 interactions with the ER luminal lectin OS9, and recognizes substrates to be degraded. INTRO
32 37 Hrd3p protein SEL1L, the mammalian homolog of Hrd3p, associates with HRD1, mediates HRD1 interactions with the ER luminal lectin OS9, and recognizes substrates to be degraded. INTRO
55 59 HRD1 protein SEL1L, the mammalian homolog of Hrd3p, associates with HRD1, mediates HRD1 interactions with the ER luminal lectin OS9, and recognizes substrates to be degraded. INTRO
70 74 HRD1 protein SEL1L, the mammalian homolog of Hrd3p, associates with HRD1, mediates HRD1 interactions with the ER luminal lectin OS9, and recognizes substrates to be degraded. INTRO
108 114 lectin protein_type SEL1L, the mammalian homolog of Hrd3p, associates with HRD1, mediates HRD1 interactions with the ER luminal lectin OS9, and recognizes substrates to be degraded. INTRO
115 118 OS9 protein SEL1L, the mammalian homolog of Hrd3p, associates with HRD1, mediates HRD1 interactions with the ER luminal lectin OS9, and recognizes substrates to be degraded. INTRO
15 20 SEL1L protein In particular, SEL1L is crucial for translocation of Class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) heavy chains (HCs). INTRO
53 93 Class I major histocompatibility complex complex_assembly In particular, SEL1L is crucial for translocation of Class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) heavy chains (HCs). INTRO
95 98 MHC complex_assembly In particular, SEL1L is crucial for translocation of Class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) heavy chains (HCs). INTRO
100 112 heavy chains protein_type In particular, SEL1L is crucial for translocation of Class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) heavy chains (HCs). INTRO
114 117 HCs protein_type In particular, SEL1L is crucial for translocation of Class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) heavy chains (HCs). INTRO
39 44 Sel1l gene Recent research based on the inducible Sel1l knockout mouse model highlights the physiological functions of SEL1L. INTRO
45 59 knockout mouse experimental_method Recent research based on the inducible Sel1l knockout mouse model highlights the physiological functions of SEL1L. INTRO
108 113 SEL1L protein Recent research based on the inducible Sel1l knockout mouse model highlights the physiological functions of SEL1L. INTRO
0 5 SEL1L protein SEL1L is required for ER homeostasis, which is essential for protein translation, pancreatic function, and cellular and organismal survival. INTRO
46 51 SEL1L protein However, despite the functional importance of SEL1L, the molecular structure of SEL1L has not been solved. INTRO
67 76 structure evidence However, despite the functional importance of SEL1L, the molecular structure of SEL1L has not been solved. INTRO
80 85 SEL1L protein However, despite the functional importance of SEL1L, the molecular structure of SEL1L has not been solved. INTRO
9 28 biochemical studies experimental_method Previous biochemical studies reveal that SEL1L is a type I transmembrane protein and has a large luminal domain comprising sets of repeated Sel1-like (SLR) motifs. INTRO
41 46 SEL1L protein Previous biochemical studies reveal that SEL1L is a type I transmembrane protein and has a large luminal domain comprising sets of repeated Sel1-like (SLR) motifs. INTRO
52 80 type I transmembrane protein protein_type Previous biochemical studies reveal that SEL1L is a type I transmembrane protein and has a large luminal domain comprising sets of repeated Sel1-like (SLR) motifs. INTRO
97 111 luminal domain structure_element Previous biochemical studies reveal that SEL1L is a type I transmembrane protein and has a large luminal domain comprising sets of repeated Sel1-like (SLR) motifs. INTRO
131 149 repeated Sel1-like structure_element Previous biochemical studies reveal that SEL1L is a type I transmembrane protein and has a large luminal domain comprising sets of repeated Sel1-like (SLR) motifs. INTRO
151 154 SLR structure_element Previous biochemical studies reveal that SEL1L is a type I transmembrane protein and has a large luminal domain comprising sets of repeated Sel1-like (SLR) motifs. INTRO
4 7 SLR structure_element The SLR motif is a structural motif that closely resembles the tetratricopeptide-repeat (TPR) motif, which is a protein-protein interaction module. INTRO
63 87 tetratricopeptide-repeat structure_element The SLR motif is a structural motif that closely resembles the tetratricopeptide-repeat (TPR) motif, which is a protein-protein interaction module. INTRO
89 92 TPR structure_element The SLR motif is a structural motif that closely resembles the tetratricopeptide-repeat (TPR) motif, which is a protein-protein interaction module. INTRO
36 50 luminal domain structure_element Although there is evidence that the luminal domain of SEL1L is involved in substrate recognition or in forming complexes with chaperones, it is not known how the unique structure of the repeated SLR motifs contributes to the molecular function of the HRD1-SEL1L E3 ligase complex and affects ERAD at the molecular level. INTRO
54 59 SEL1L protein Although there is evidence that the luminal domain of SEL1L is involved in substrate recognition or in forming complexes with chaperones, it is not known how the unique structure of the repeated SLR motifs contributes to the molecular function of the HRD1-SEL1L E3 ligase complex and affects ERAD at the molecular level. INTRO
126 136 chaperones protein_type Although there is evidence that the luminal domain of SEL1L is involved in substrate recognition or in forming complexes with chaperones, it is not known how the unique structure of the repeated SLR motifs contributes to the molecular function of the HRD1-SEL1L E3 ligase complex and affects ERAD at the molecular level. INTRO
195 198 SLR structure_element Although there is evidence that the luminal domain of SEL1L is involved in substrate recognition or in forming complexes with chaperones, it is not known how the unique structure of the repeated SLR motifs contributes to the molecular function of the HRD1-SEL1L E3 ligase complex and affects ERAD at the molecular level. INTRO
251 261 HRD1-SEL1L complex_assembly Although there is evidence that the luminal domain of SEL1L is involved in substrate recognition or in forming complexes with chaperones, it is not known how the unique structure of the repeated SLR motifs contributes to the molecular function of the HRD1-SEL1L E3 ligase complex and affects ERAD at the molecular level. INTRO
262 271 E3 ligase protein_type Although there is evidence that the luminal domain of SEL1L is involved in substrate recognition or in forming complexes with chaperones, it is not known how the unique structure of the repeated SLR motifs contributes to the molecular function of the HRD1-SEL1L E3 ligase complex and affects ERAD at the molecular level. INTRO
28 31 SLR structure_element Furthermore, while repeated SLR motifs are commonly found in tandem arrays, the SLR motifs in SEL1L are, according to the primary structure prediction of SEL1L, interspersed among other sequences in the luminal domain and form three SLR domain clusters. INTRO
80 83 SLR structure_element Furthermore, while repeated SLR motifs are commonly found in tandem arrays, the SLR motifs in SEL1L are, according to the primary structure prediction of SEL1L, interspersed among other sequences in the luminal domain and form three SLR domain clusters. INTRO
94 99 SEL1L protein Furthermore, while repeated SLR motifs are commonly found in tandem arrays, the SLR motifs in SEL1L are, according to the primary structure prediction of SEL1L, interspersed among other sequences in the luminal domain and form three SLR domain clusters. INTRO
154 159 SEL1L protein Furthermore, while repeated SLR motifs are commonly found in tandem arrays, the SLR motifs in SEL1L are, according to the primary structure prediction of SEL1L, interspersed among other sequences in the luminal domain and form three SLR domain clusters. INTRO
203 217 luminal domain structure_element Furthermore, while repeated SLR motifs are commonly found in tandem arrays, the SLR motifs in SEL1L are, according to the primary structure prediction of SEL1L, interspersed among other sequences in the luminal domain and form three SLR domain clusters. INTRO
233 236 SLR structure_element Furthermore, while repeated SLR motifs are commonly found in tandem arrays, the SLR motifs in SEL1L are, according to the primary structure prediction of SEL1L, interspersed among other sequences in the luminal domain and form three SLR domain clusters. INTRO
64 69 SEL1L protein Therefore, the way in which these unique structural features of SEL1L are related to its critical function in ERAD remains to be elucidated. INTRO
50 53 SLR structure_element To clearly understand the biochemical role of the SLR domains of SEL1L in ERAD, we determined the crystal structure of the central SLR domain of SEL1L. INTRO
65 70 SEL1L protein To clearly understand the biochemical role of the SLR domains of SEL1L in ERAD, we determined the crystal structure of the central SLR domain of SEL1L. INTRO
98 115 crystal structure evidence To clearly understand the biochemical role of the SLR domains of SEL1L in ERAD, we determined the crystal structure of the central SLR domain of SEL1L. INTRO
131 134 SLR structure_element To clearly understand the biochemical role of the SLR domains of SEL1L in ERAD, we determined the crystal structure of the central SLR domain of SEL1L. INTRO
145 150 SEL1L protein To clearly understand the biochemical role of the SLR domains of SEL1L in ERAD, we determined the crystal structure of the central SLR domain of SEL1L. INTRO
18 32 central domain structure_element We found that the central domain of SEL1L, comprising SLR motifs 5 through 9 (SEL1Lcent), forms a tight dimer with two-fold symmetry due to domain swapping of the SLR motif 9. INTRO
36 41 SEL1L protein We found that the central domain of SEL1L, comprising SLR motifs 5 through 9 (SEL1Lcent), forms a tight dimer with two-fold symmetry due to domain swapping of the SLR motif 9. INTRO
54 76 SLR motifs 5 through 9 structure_element We found that the central domain of SEL1L, comprising SLR motifs 5 through 9 (SEL1Lcent), forms a tight dimer with two-fold symmetry due to domain swapping of the SLR motif 9. INTRO
78 87 SEL1Lcent structure_element We found that the central domain of SEL1L, comprising SLR motifs 5 through 9 (SEL1Lcent), forms a tight dimer with two-fold symmetry due to domain swapping of the SLR motif 9. INTRO
104 109 dimer oligomeric_state We found that the central domain of SEL1L, comprising SLR motifs 5 through 9 (SEL1Lcent), forms a tight dimer with two-fold symmetry due to domain swapping of the SLR motif 9. INTRO
163 174 SLR motif 9 structure_element We found that the central domain of SEL1L, comprising SLR motifs 5 through 9 (SEL1Lcent), forms a tight dimer with two-fold symmetry due to domain swapping of the SLR motif 9. INTRO
19 24 SLR-C structure_element We also found that SLR-C, consisting of SLR motifs 10 and 11, directly interacts with the N-terminus luminal loop of HRD1. INTRO
40 60 SLR motifs 10 and 11 structure_element We also found that SLR-C, consisting of SLR motifs 10 and 11, directly interacts with the N-terminus luminal loop of HRD1. INTRO
101 113 luminal loop structure_element We also found that SLR-C, consisting of SLR motifs 10 and 11, directly interacts with the N-terminus luminal loop of HRD1. INTRO
117 121 HRD1 protein We also found that SLR-C, consisting of SLR motifs 10 and 11, directly interacts with the N-terminus luminal loop of HRD1. INTRO
60 63 SLR structure_element Based on these observations, we propose a model wherein the SLR domains of SEL1L contribute to the formation of stable oligomers of the ERAD translocation machinery, which is indispensable for ERAD. INTRO
75 80 SEL1L protein Based on these observations, we propose a model wherein the SLR domains of SEL1L contribute to the formation of stable oligomers of the ERAD translocation machinery, which is indispensable for ERAD. INTRO
112 118 stable protein_state Based on these observations, we propose a model wherein the SLR domains of SEL1L contribute to the formation of stable oligomers of the ERAD translocation machinery, which is indispensable for ERAD. INTRO
119 128 oligomers oligomeric_state Based on these observations, we propose a model wherein the SLR domains of SEL1L contribute to the formation of stable oligomers of the ERAD translocation machinery, which is indispensable for ERAD. INTRO
0 23 Structure Determination experimental_method Structure Determination of SEL1Lcent RESULTS
27 36 SEL1Lcent structure_element Structure Determination of SEL1Lcent RESULTS
4 16 Mus musculus species The Mus musculus SEL1L protein contains 790 amino acids and has 17% sequence identity to its yeast homolog, Hrd3p. RESULTS
17 22 SEL1L protein The Mus musculus SEL1L protein contains 790 amino acids and has 17% sequence identity to its yeast homolog, Hrd3p. RESULTS
93 98 yeast taxonomy_domain The Mus musculus SEL1L protein contains 790 amino acids and has 17% sequence identity to its yeast homolog, Hrd3p. RESULTS
108 113 Hrd3p protein The Mus musculus SEL1L protein contains 790 amino acids and has 17% sequence identity to its yeast homolog, Hrd3p. RESULTS
0 5 Mouse taxonomy_domain Mouse SEL1L contains a fibronectin type II domain at the N-terminus, followed by 11 SLR motifs and a single transmembrane domain at the C-terminus (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
6 11 SEL1L protein Mouse SEL1L contains a fibronectin type II domain at the N-terminus, followed by 11 SLR motifs and a single transmembrane domain at the C-terminus (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
23 49 fibronectin type II domain structure_element Mouse SEL1L contains a fibronectin type II domain at the N-terminus, followed by 11 SLR motifs and a single transmembrane domain at the C-terminus (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
84 87 SLR structure_element Mouse SEL1L contains a fibronectin type II domain at the N-terminus, followed by 11 SLR motifs and a single transmembrane domain at the C-terminus (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
108 128 transmembrane domain structure_element Mouse SEL1L contains a fibronectin type II domain at the N-terminus, followed by 11 SLR motifs and a single transmembrane domain at the C-terminus (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
7 10 SLR structure_element The 11 SLR motifs are located in the ER lumen and account for more than two thirds of the mass of full-length SEL1L. RESULTS
98 109 full-length protein_state The 11 SLR motifs are located in the ER lumen and account for more than two thirds of the mass of full-length SEL1L. RESULTS
110 115 SEL1L protein The 11 SLR motifs are located in the ER lumen and account for more than two thirds of the mass of full-length SEL1L. RESULTS
4 7 SLR structure_element The SLR motifs can be grouped into three regions due to the presence of linker sequences among the groups of SLR motifs: SLR-N (SLR motifs 1 to 4), SLR-M (SLR motifs 5 to 9), and SLR-C (SLR motifs 10 to 11) (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
72 88 linker sequences structure_element The SLR motifs can be grouped into three regions due to the presence of linker sequences among the groups of SLR motifs: SLR-N (SLR motifs 1 to 4), SLR-M (SLR motifs 5 to 9), and SLR-C (SLR motifs 10 to 11) (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
109 112 SLR structure_element The SLR motifs can be grouped into three regions due to the presence of linker sequences among the groups of SLR motifs: SLR-N (SLR motifs 1 to 4), SLR-M (SLR motifs 5 to 9), and SLR-C (SLR motifs 10 to 11) (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
121 126 SLR-N structure_element The SLR motifs can be grouped into three regions due to the presence of linker sequences among the groups of SLR motifs: SLR-N (SLR motifs 1 to 4), SLR-M (SLR motifs 5 to 9), and SLR-C (SLR motifs 10 to 11) (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
128 145 SLR motifs 1 to 4 structure_element The SLR motifs can be grouped into three regions due to the presence of linker sequences among the groups of SLR motifs: SLR-N (SLR motifs 1 to 4), SLR-M (SLR motifs 5 to 9), and SLR-C (SLR motifs 10 to 11) (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
148 153 SLR-M structure_element The SLR motifs can be grouped into three regions due to the presence of linker sequences among the groups of SLR motifs: SLR-N (SLR motifs 1 to 4), SLR-M (SLR motifs 5 to 9), and SLR-C (SLR motifs 10 to 11) (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
155 172 SLR motifs 5 to 9 structure_element The SLR motifs can be grouped into three regions due to the presence of linker sequences among the groups of SLR motifs: SLR-N (SLR motifs 1 to 4), SLR-M (SLR motifs 5 to 9), and SLR-C (SLR motifs 10 to 11) (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
179 184 SLR-C structure_element The SLR motifs can be grouped into three regions due to the presence of linker sequences among the groups of SLR motifs: SLR-N (SLR motifs 1 to 4), SLR-M (SLR motifs 5 to 9), and SLR-C (SLR motifs 10 to 11) (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
186 205 SLR motifs 10 to 11 structure_element The SLR motifs can be grouped into three regions due to the presence of linker sequences among the groups of SLR motifs: SLR-N (SLR motifs 1 to 4), SLR-M (SLR motifs 5 to 9), and SLR-C (SLR motifs 10 to 11) (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
0 18 Sequence alignment experimental_method Sequence alignment of the SLR motifs revealed that there is a short linker sequence (residues 336345) between SLR-N and SLR-M and a long linker sequence (residues 528635) between SLR-M and SLR-C (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
26 29 SLR structure_element Sequence alignment of the SLR motifs revealed that there is a short linker sequence (residues 336345) between SLR-N and SLR-M and a long linker sequence (residues 528635) between SLR-M and SLR-C (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
68 83 linker sequence structure_element Sequence alignment of the SLR motifs revealed that there is a short linker sequence (residues 336345) between SLR-N and SLR-M and a long linker sequence (residues 528635) between SLR-M and SLR-C (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
94 101 336345 residue_range Sequence alignment of the SLR motifs revealed that there is a short linker sequence (residues 336345) between SLR-N and SLR-M and a long linker sequence (residues 528635) between SLR-M and SLR-C (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
111 116 SLR-N structure_element Sequence alignment of the SLR motifs revealed that there is a short linker sequence (residues 336345) between SLR-N and SLR-M and a long linker sequence (residues 528635) between SLR-M and SLR-C (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
121 126 SLR-M structure_element Sequence alignment of the SLR motifs revealed that there is a short linker sequence (residues 336345) between SLR-N and SLR-M and a long linker sequence (residues 528635) between SLR-M and SLR-C (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
138 153 linker sequence structure_element Sequence alignment of the SLR motifs revealed that there is a short linker sequence (residues 336345) between SLR-N and SLR-M and a long linker sequence (residues 528635) between SLR-M and SLR-C (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
164 171 528635 residue_range Sequence alignment of the SLR motifs revealed that there is a short linker sequence (residues 336345) between SLR-N and SLR-M and a long linker sequence (residues 528635) between SLR-M and SLR-C (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
181 186 SLR-M structure_element Sequence alignment of the SLR motifs revealed that there is a short linker sequence (residues 336345) between SLR-N and SLR-M and a long linker sequence (residues 528635) between SLR-M and SLR-C (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
191 196 SLR-C structure_element Sequence alignment of the SLR motifs revealed that there is a short linker sequence (residues 336345) between SLR-N and SLR-M and a long linker sequence (residues 528635) between SLR-M and SLR-C (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
30 41 full-length protein_state We first tried to prepare the full-length mouse SEL1L protein, excluding the transmembrane domain at the C-terminus (residues 735755), by expression in bacteria. RESULTS
42 47 mouse taxonomy_domain We first tried to prepare the full-length mouse SEL1L protein, excluding the transmembrane domain at the C-terminus (residues 735755), by expression in bacteria. RESULTS
48 53 SEL1L protein We first tried to prepare the full-length mouse SEL1L protein, excluding the transmembrane domain at the C-terminus (residues 735755), by expression in bacteria. RESULTS
77 97 transmembrane domain structure_element We first tried to prepare the full-length mouse SEL1L protein, excluding the transmembrane domain at the C-terminus (residues 735755), by expression in bacteria. RESULTS
126 133 735755 residue_range We first tried to prepare the full-length mouse SEL1L protein, excluding the transmembrane domain at the C-terminus (residues 735755), by expression in bacteria. RESULTS
139 161 expression in bacteria experimental_method We first tried to prepare the full-length mouse SEL1L protein, excluding the transmembrane domain at the C-terminus (residues 735755), by expression in bacteria. RESULTS
13 24 full-length protein_state However, the full-length SEL1L protein aggregated in solution and produced no soluble protein. RESULTS
25 30 SEL1L protein However, the full-length SEL1L protein aggregated in solution and produced no soluble protein. RESULTS
30 35 SEL1L protein To identify a soluble form of SEL1L, we generated serial truncation constructs of SEL1L based on the predicted SLR motifs and highly conserved regions across several different species. RESULTS
50 78 serial truncation constructs experimental_method To identify a soluble form of SEL1L, we generated serial truncation constructs of SEL1L based on the predicted SLR motifs and highly conserved regions across several different species. RESULTS
82 87 SEL1L protein To identify a soluble form of SEL1L, we generated serial truncation constructs of SEL1L based on the predicted SLR motifs and highly conserved regions across several different species. RESULTS
111 114 SLR structure_element To identify a soluble form of SEL1L, we generated serial truncation constructs of SEL1L based on the predicted SLR motifs and highly conserved regions across several different species. RESULTS
126 142 highly conserved protein_state To identify a soluble form of SEL1L, we generated serial truncation constructs of SEL1L based on the predicted SLR motifs and highly conserved regions across several different species. RESULTS
5 10 SLR-N structure_element Both SLR-N (residues 194343) and SLR-C (residues 639719) alone could be solubilized with an MBP tag at the N-terminus, but appeared to be polydisperse when analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography. RESULTS
21 28 194343 residue_range Both SLR-N (residues 194343) and SLR-C (residues 639719) alone could be solubilized with an MBP tag at the N-terminus, but appeared to be polydisperse when analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography. RESULTS
34 39 SLR-C structure_element Both SLR-N (residues 194343) and SLR-C (residues 639719) alone could be solubilized with an MBP tag at the N-terminus, but appeared to be polydisperse when analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography. RESULTS
50 57 639719 residue_range Both SLR-N (residues 194343) and SLR-C (residues 639719) alone could be solubilized with an MBP tag at the N-terminus, but appeared to be polydisperse when analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography. RESULTS
94 119 MBP tag at the N-terminus experimental_method Both SLR-N (residues 194343) and SLR-C (residues 639719) alone could be solubilized with an MBP tag at the N-terminus, but appeared to be polydisperse when analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography. RESULTS
170 199 size-exclusion chromatography experimental_method Both SLR-N (residues 194343) and SLR-C (residues 639719) alone could be solubilized with an MBP tag at the N-terminus, but appeared to be polydisperse when analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography. RESULTS
13 27 central region structure_element However, the central region of SEL1L, comprising residues 337554, was soluble and homogenous in size, as determined by size-exclusion chromatography. RESULTS
31 36 SEL1L protein However, the central region of SEL1L, comprising residues 337554, was soluble and homogenous in size, as determined by size-exclusion chromatography. RESULTS
58 65 337554 residue_range However, the central region of SEL1L, comprising residues 337554, was soluble and homogenous in size, as determined by size-exclusion chromatography. RESULTS
120 149 size-exclusion chromatography experimental_method However, the central region of SEL1L, comprising residues 337554, was soluble and homogenous in size, as determined by size-exclusion chromatography. RESULTS
44 58 central region structure_element To define compact domain boundaries for the central region of SEL1L, we digested the protein with trypsin and analyzed the proteolysis products by SDS-PAGE and N-terminal sequencing. RESULTS
62 67 SEL1L protein To define compact domain boundaries for the central region of SEL1L, we digested the protein with trypsin and analyzed the proteolysis products by SDS-PAGE and N-terminal sequencing. RESULTS
72 105 digested the protein with trypsin experimental_method To define compact domain boundaries for the central region of SEL1L, we digested the protein with trypsin and analyzed the proteolysis products by SDS-PAGE and N-terminal sequencing. RESULTS
147 155 SDS-PAGE experimental_method To define compact domain boundaries for the central region of SEL1L, we digested the protein with trypsin and analyzed the proteolysis products by SDS-PAGE and N-terminal sequencing. RESULTS
160 181 N-terminal sequencing experimental_method To define compact domain boundaries for the central region of SEL1L, we digested the protein with trypsin and analyzed the proteolysis products by SDS-PAGE and N-terminal sequencing. RESULTS
68 73 SEL1L protein The results of this preliminary biochemical analysis suggested that SEL1L residues 348533 (SEL1Lcent) would be amenable to structural analysis (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
83 90 348533 residue_range The results of this preliminary biochemical analysis suggested that SEL1L residues 348533 (SEL1Lcent) would be amenable to structural analysis (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
92 101 SEL1Lcent structure_element The results of this preliminary biochemical analysis suggested that SEL1L residues 348533 (SEL1Lcent) would be amenable to structural analysis (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
124 143 structural analysis experimental_method The results of this preliminary biochemical analysis suggested that SEL1L residues 348533 (SEL1Lcent) would be amenable to structural analysis (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
0 8 Crystals evidence Crystals of SEL1Lcent grew in space group P21 with four copies of SEL1Lcent (a total of 82 kDa) in the asymmetric unit. RESULTS
12 21 SEL1Lcent structure_element Crystals of SEL1Lcent grew in space group P21 with four copies of SEL1Lcent (a total of 82 kDa) in the asymmetric unit. RESULTS
66 75 SEL1Lcent structure_element Crystals of SEL1Lcent grew in space group P21 with four copies of SEL1Lcent (a total of 82 kDa) in the asymmetric unit. RESULTS
4 13 structure evidence The structure was determined by the single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) method using selenium as the anomalous scatterer (Table 1 and Methods). RESULTS
36 75 single-wavelength anomalous diffraction experimental_method The structure was determined by the single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) method using selenium as the anomalous scatterer (Table 1 and Methods). RESULTS
77 80 SAD experimental_method The structure was determined by the single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) method using selenium as the anomalous scatterer (Table 1 and Methods). RESULTS
95 103 selenium chemical The structure was determined by the single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) method using selenium as the anomalous scatterer (Table 1 and Methods). RESULTS
66 74 selenium chemical The assignment of residues during model building was aided by the selenium atom positions, and the structure was refined with native data to 2.6 Å resolution with Rwork/Rfree values of 20.7/27.7%. RESULTS
99 108 structure evidence The assignment of residues during model building was aided by the selenium atom positions, and the structure was refined with native data to 2.6 Å resolution with Rwork/Rfree values of 20.7/27.7%. RESULTS
163 174 Rwork/Rfree evidence The assignment of residues during model building was aided by the selenium atom positions, and the structure was refined with native data to 2.6 Å resolution with Rwork/Rfree values of 20.7/27.7%. RESULTS
8 17 Structure evidence Overall Structure of SEL1Lcent RESULTS
21 30 SEL1Lcent structure_element Overall Structure of SEL1Lcent RESULTS
4 9 mouse taxonomy_domain The mouse SEL1Lcent crystallized as a homodimer, and there were two homodimers in the crystal asymmetric unit (Fig. 1B,C, Supplementary Fig. 1). RESULTS
10 19 SEL1Lcent structure_element The mouse SEL1Lcent crystallized as a homodimer, and there were two homodimers in the crystal asymmetric unit (Fig. 1B,C, Supplementary Fig. 1). RESULTS
20 32 crystallized experimental_method The mouse SEL1Lcent crystallized as a homodimer, and there were two homodimers in the crystal asymmetric unit (Fig. 1B,C, Supplementary Fig. 1). RESULTS
38 47 homodimer oligomeric_state The mouse SEL1Lcent crystallized as a homodimer, and there were two homodimers in the crystal asymmetric unit (Fig. 1B,C, Supplementary Fig. 1). RESULTS
68 78 homodimers oligomeric_state The mouse SEL1Lcent crystallized as a homodimer, and there were two homodimers in the crystal asymmetric unit (Fig. 1B,C, Supplementary Fig. 1). RESULTS
8 17 SEL1Lcent structure_element The two SEL1Lcent molecules dimerize in a head-to-tail manner through a two-fold symmetry interface resulting in a cosmos-like shaped structure (Fig. 1B). RESULTS
28 36 dimerize oligomeric_state The two SEL1Lcent molecules dimerize in a head-to-tail manner through a two-fold symmetry interface resulting in a cosmos-like shaped structure (Fig. 1B). RESULTS
42 54 head-to-tail protein_state The two SEL1Lcent molecules dimerize in a head-to-tail manner through a two-fold symmetry interface resulting in a cosmos-like shaped structure (Fig. 1B). RESULTS
72 99 two-fold symmetry interface site The two SEL1Lcent molecules dimerize in a head-to-tail manner through a two-fold symmetry interface resulting in a cosmos-like shaped structure (Fig. 1B). RESULTS
134 143 structure evidence The two SEL1Lcent molecules dimerize in a head-to-tail manner through a two-fold symmetry interface resulting in a cosmos-like shaped structure (Fig. 1B). RESULTS
14 23 structure evidence The resulting structure resembles the yin-yang symbol with overall dimensions of 60 × 60 × 25 Å, where a SEL1Lcent monomer corresponds to half the symbol. RESULTS
105 114 SEL1Lcent structure_element The resulting structure resembles the yin-yang symbol with overall dimensions of 60 × 60 × 25 Å, where a SEL1Lcent monomer corresponds to half the symbol. RESULTS
115 122 monomer oligomeric_state The resulting structure resembles the yin-yang symbol with overall dimensions of 60 × 60 × 25 Å, where a SEL1Lcent monomer corresponds to half the symbol. RESULTS
4 9 dimer oligomeric_state The dimer formation buries a surface area of 1670 Å2 for each monomer, and no significant differences between the protomers were displayed (final root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 0.6 Å for all Cα atoms). RESULTS
62 69 monomer oligomeric_state The dimer formation buries a surface area of 1670 Å2 for each monomer, and no significant differences between the protomers were displayed (final root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 0.6 Å for all Cα atoms). RESULTS
114 123 protomers oligomeric_state The dimer formation buries a surface area of 1670 Å2 for each monomer, and no significant differences between the protomers were displayed (final root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 0.6 Å for all Cα atoms). RESULTS
146 172 root mean square deviation evidence The dimer formation buries a surface area of 1670 Å2 for each monomer, and no significant differences between the protomers were displayed (final root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 0.6 Å for all Cα atoms). RESULTS
174 178 RMSD evidence The dimer formation buries a surface area of 1670 Å2 for each monomer, and no significant differences between the protomers were displayed (final root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 0.6 Å for all Cα atoms). RESULTS
5 13 protomer oligomeric_state Each protomer is composed of ten α-helices, which form the five SLRs, resulting in an elongated curved structure, confirming the primary structure prediction (Fig. 1D). RESULTS
33 42 α-helices structure_element Each protomer is composed of ten α-helices, which form the five SLRs, resulting in an elongated curved structure, confirming the primary structure prediction (Fig. 1D). RESULTS
64 68 SLRs structure_element Each protomer is composed of ten α-helices, which form the five SLRs, resulting in an elongated curved structure, confirming the primary structure prediction (Fig. 1D). RESULTS
4 13 α-helices structure_element The α-helices subdivide the structure into five pairs (A and B) as shown in a number of TPRs and SLRs. RESULTS
28 37 structure evidence The α-helices subdivide the structure into five pairs (A and B) as shown in a number of TPRs and SLRs. RESULTS
55 56 A structure_element The α-helices subdivide the structure into five pairs (A and B) as shown in a number of TPRs and SLRs. RESULTS
61 62 B structure_element The α-helices subdivide the structure into five pairs (A and B) as shown in a number of TPRs and SLRs. RESULTS
88 92 TPRs structure_element The α-helices subdivide the structure into five pairs (A and B) as shown in a number of TPRs and SLRs. RESULTS
97 101 SLRs structure_element The α-helices subdivide the structure into five pairs (A and B) as shown in a number of TPRs and SLRs. RESULTS
0 15 Helices A and B structure_element Helices A and B are 14 and 13 residues long, respectively, and the two helices are connected by a short turn and loop (Fig. 1D). RESULTS
71 78 helices structure_element Helices A and B are 14 and 13 residues long, respectively, and the two helices are connected by a short turn and loop (Fig. 1D). RESULTS
104 108 turn structure_element Helices A and B are 14 and 13 residues long, respectively, and the two helices are connected by a short turn and loop (Fig. 1D). RESULTS
113 117 loop structure_element Helices A and B are 14 and 13 residues long, respectively, and the two helices are connected by a short turn and loop (Fig. 1D). RESULTS
22 26 loop structure_element In addition, a longer loop, consisting of approximately eight amino acids, is inserted between helix B of one SLR and helix A of the next SLR. RESULTS
95 102 helix B structure_element In addition, a longer loop, consisting of approximately eight amino acids, is inserted between helix B of one SLR and helix A of the next SLR. RESULTS
110 113 SLR structure_element In addition, a longer loop, consisting of approximately eight amino acids, is inserted between helix B of one SLR and helix A of the next SLR. RESULTS
118 125 helix A structure_element In addition, a longer loop, consisting of approximately eight amino acids, is inserted between helix B of one SLR and helix A of the next SLR. RESULTS
138 141 SLR structure_element In addition, a longer loop, consisting of approximately eight amino acids, is inserted between helix B of one SLR and helix A of the next SLR. RESULTS
41 45 SLRs structure_element This arrangement is a unique feature for SLRs among the major classes of repeats containing an α-solenoid. RESULTS
95 105 α-solenoid structure_element This arrangement is a unique feature for SLRs among the major classes of repeats containing an α-solenoid. RESULTS
34 44 α-solenoid structure_element Starting from its N-terminus, the α-solenoid of SEL1L extends across a semi-circle in a right-handed superhelix fashion along the rotation axis of the yin-yang circle. RESULTS
48 53 SEL1L protein Starting from its N-terminus, the α-solenoid of SEL1L extends across a semi-circle in a right-handed superhelix fashion along the rotation axis of the yin-yang circle. RESULTS
151 166 yin-yang circle structure_element Starting from its N-terminus, the α-solenoid of SEL1L extends across a semi-circle in a right-handed superhelix fashion along the rotation axis of the yin-yang circle. RESULTS
25 27 9B structure_element However, the last helix, 9B, at the C-terminus adopts a different conformation, lying parallel to the long axis of helix 9A instead of forming an antiparallel SLR. RESULTS
115 123 helix 9A structure_element However, the last helix, 9B, at the C-terminus adopts a different conformation, lying parallel to the long axis of helix 9A instead of forming an antiparallel SLR. RESULTS
159 162 SLR structure_element However, the last helix, 9B, at the C-terminus adopts a different conformation, lying parallel to the long axis of helix 9A instead of forming an antiparallel SLR. RESULTS
28 36 helix 9B structure_element This unique conformation of helix 9B most likely contributes to formation of the dimer structure of SEL1Lcent, as detailed below. RESULTS
81 86 dimer oligomeric_state This unique conformation of helix 9B most likely contributes to formation of the dimer structure of SEL1Lcent, as detailed below. RESULTS
100 109 SEL1Lcent structure_element This unique conformation of helix 9B most likely contributes to formation of the dimer structure of SEL1Lcent, as detailed below. RESULTS
31 34 SLR structure_element With the exception of the last SLR, the four α-helix pairs possess similar conformations, with RMSD values of 0.7 Å for all Cα atoms. RESULTS
45 52 α-helix structure_element With the exception of the last SLR, the four α-helix pairs possess similar conformations, with RMSD values of 0.7 Å for all Cα atoms. RESULTS
95 99 RMSD evidence With the exception of the last SLR, the four α-helix pairs possess similar conformations, with RMSD values of 0.7 Å for all Cα atoms. RESULTS
41 60 pairwise alignments experimental_method Although the sequence similarity for the pairwise alignments varies between 25% and 35%, all the residues present in the SLR motifs are conserved among the five pairs. RESULTS
121 124 SLR structure_element Although the sequence similarity for the pairwise alignments varies between 25% and 35%, all the residues present in the SLR motifs are conserved among the five pairs. RESULTS
136 145 conserved protein_state Although the sequence similarity for the pairwise alignments varies between 25% and 35%, all the residues present in the SLR motifs are conserved among the five pairs. RESULTS
4 7 SLR structure_element The SLR domain of SLR-M ends at residue 524, and C-terminal amino acids 525533 of the protein are not visible in the electron density map, suggesting that this region is highly flexible. RESULTS
18 23 SLR-M structure_element The SLR domain of SLR-M ends at residue 524, and C-terminal amino acids 525533 of the protein are not visible in the electron density map, suggesting that this region is highly flexible. RESULTS
40 43 524 residue_number The SLR domain of SLR-M ends at residue 524, and C-terminal amino acids 525533 of the protein are not visible in the electron density map, suggesting that this region is highly flexible. RESULTS
72 79 525533 residue_range The SLR domain of SLR-M ends at residue 524, and C-terminal amino acids 525533 of the protein are not visible in the electron density map, suggesting that this region is highly flexible. RESULTS
118 138 electron density map evidence The SLR domain of SLR-M ends at residue 524, and C-terminal amino acids 525533 of the protein are not visible in the electron density map, suggesting that this region is highly flexible. RESULTS
171 186 highly flexible protein_state The SLR domain of SLR-M ends at residue 524, and C-terminal amino acids 525533 of the protein are not visible in the electron density map, suggesting that this region is highly flexible. RESULTS
31 36 dimer oligomeric_state Since no information regarding dimer formation by SEL1L through its SLR motifs is available, we tested whether the SEL1Lcent dimer shown in our crystal structure is a biological unit. RESULTS
50 55 SEL1L protein Since no information regarding dimer formation by SEL1L through its SLR motifs is available, we tested whether the SEL1Lcent dimer shown in our crystal structure is a biological unit. RESULTS
68 71 SLR structure_element Since no information regarding dimer formation by SEL1L through its SLR motifs is available, we tested whether the SEL1Lcent dimer shown in our crystal structure is a biological unit. RESULTS
115 124 SEL1Lcent structure_element Since no information regarding dimer formation by SEL1L through its SLR motifs is available, we tested whether the SEL1Lcent dimer shown in our crystal structure is a biological unit. RESULTS
125 130 dimer oligomeric_state Since no information regarding dimer formation by SEL1L through its SLR motifs is available, we tested whether the SEL1Lcent dimer shown in our crystal structure is a biological unit. RESULTS
144 161 crystal structure evidence Since no information regarding dimer formation by SEL1L through its SLR motifs is available, we tested whether the SEL1Lcent dimer shown in our crystal structure is a biological unit. RESULTS
10 22 cross-linked experimental_method First, we cross-linked SEL1Lcent or a longer construct of SEL1L (SEL1Llong, residues 337554) using various concentrations of glutaraldehyde (GA) or dimethyl suberimidate (DMS) and analyzed the products by SDS-PAGE. RESULTS
23 32 SEL1Lcent structure_element First, we cross-linked SEL1Lcent or a longer construct of SEL1L (SEL1Llong, residues 337554) using various concentrations of glutaraldehyde (GA) or dimethyl suberimidate (DMS) and analyzed the products by SDS-PAGE. RESULTS
58 63 SEL1L protein First, we cross-linked SEL1Lcent or a longer construct of SEL1L (SEL1Llong, residues 337554) using various concentrations of glutaraldehyde (GA) or dimethyl suberimidate (DMS) and analyzed the products by SDS-PAGE. RESULTS
65 74 SEL1Llong mutant First, we cross-linked SEL1Lcent or a longer construct of SEL1L (SEL1Llong, residues 337554) using various concentrations of glutaraldehyde (GA) or dimethyl suberimidate (DMS) and analyzed the products by SDS-PAGE. RESULTS
85 92 337554 residue_range First, we cross-linked SEL1Lcent or a longer construct of SEL1L (SEL1Llong, residues 337554) using various concentrations of glutaraldehyde (GA) or dimethyl suberimidate (DMS) and analyzed the products by SDS-PAGE. RESULTS
126 140 glutaraldehyde chemical First, we cross-linked SEL1Lcent or a longer construct of SEL1L (SEL1Llong, residues 337554) using various concentrations of glutaraldehyde (GA) or dimethyl suberimidate (DMS) and analyzed the products by SDS-PAGE. RESULTS
142 144 GA chemical First, we cross-linked SEL1Lcent or a longer construct of SEL1L (SEL1Llong, residues 337554) using various concentrations of glutaraldehyde (GA) or dimethyl suberimidate (DMS) and analyzed the products by SDS-PAGE. RESULTS
149 170 dimethyl suberimidate chemical First, we cross-linked SEL1Lcent or a longer construct of SEL1L (SEL1Llong, residues 337554) using various concentrations of glutaraldehyde (GA) or dimethyl suberimidate (DMS) and analyzed the products by SDS-PAGE. RESULTS
172 175 DMS chemical First, we cross-linked SEL1Lcent or a longer construct of SEL1L (SEL1Llong, residues 337554) using various concentrations of glutaraldehyde (GA) or dimethyl suberimidate (DMS) and analyzed the products by SDS-PAGE. RESULTS
206 214 SDS-PAGE experimental_method First, we cross-linked SEL1Lcent or a longer construct of SEL1L (SEL1Llong, residues 337554) using various concentrations of glutaraldehyde (GA) or dimethyl suberimidate (DMS) and analyzed the products by SDS-PAGE. RESULTS
35 40 dimer oligomeric_state We detected bands at the mass of a dimer for both SEL1Lcent and SEL1Llong when cross-linked with low concentrations of GA (0.005%) or DMS (0.3 mM) (Supplementary Fig. 2A,B). RESULTS
50 59 SEL1Lcent structure_element We detected bands at the mass of a dimer for both SEL1Lcent and SEL1Llong when cross-linked with low concentrations of GA (0.005%) or DMS (0.3 mM) (Supplementary Fig. 2A,B). RESULTS
64 73 SEL1Llong mutant We detected bands at the mass of a dimer for both SEL1Lcent and SEL1Llong when cross-linked with low concentrations of GA (0.005%) or DMS (0.3 mM) (Supplementary Fig. 2A,B). RESULTS
79 91 cross-linked experimental_method We detected bands at the mass of a dimer for both SEL1Lcent and SEL1Llong when cross-linked with low concentrations of GA (0.005%) or DMS (0.3 mM) (Supplementary Fig. 2A,B). RESULTS
119 121 GA chemical We detected bands at the mass of a dimer for both SEL1Lcent and SEL1Llong when cross-linked with low concentrations of GA (0.005%) or DMS (0.3 mM) (Supplementary Fig. 2A,B). RESULTS
134 137 DMS chemical We detected bands at the mass of a dimer for both SEL1Lcent and SEL1Llong when cross-linked with low concentrations of GA (0.005%) or DMS (0.3 mM) (Supplementary Fig. 2A,B). RESULTS
19 49 analytical ultracentrifugation experimental_method Next, we conducted analytical ultracentrifugation of SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
53 62 SEL1Lcent structure_element Next, we conducted analytical ultracentrifugation of SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
20 33 cross-linking experimental_method Consistent with the cross-linking data, analytical ultracentrifugation revealed that the molecular weight of SEL1Lcent corresponds to a dimer (Supplementary Fig. 2C). RESULTS
40 70 analytical ultracentrifugation experimental_method Consistent with the cross-linking data, analytical ultracentrifugation revealed that the molecular weight of SEL1Lcent corresponds to a dimer (Supplementary Fig. 2C). RESULTS
89 105 molecular weight evidence Consistent with the cross-linking data, analytical ultracentrifugation revealed that the molecular weight of SEL1Lcent corresponds to a dimer (Supplementary Fig. 2C). RESULTS
109 118 SEL1Lcent structure_element Consistent with the cross-linking data, analytical ultracentrifugation revealed that the molecular weight of SEL1Lcent corresponds to a dimer (Supplementary Fig. 2C). RESULTS
136 141 dimer oligomeric_state Consistent with the cross-linking data, analytical ultracentrifugation revealed that the molecular weight of SEL1Lcent corresponds to a dimer (Supplementary Fig. 2C). RESULTS
54 59 dimer oligomeric_state Taken together, these data indicate that some kind of dimer is formed in solution. RESULTS
0 15 Dimer Interface site Dimer Interface of SEL1Lcent RESULTS
19 28 SEL1Lcent structure_element Dimer Interface of SEL1Lcent RESULTS
38 67 SLR motif containing proteins protein_type In contrast to a previously described SLR motif containing proteins that exist as monomers in solution, SEL1Lcent forms an intimate two-fold homotypic dimer interface (Figs 1B and 2A). RESULTS
82 90 monomers oligomeric_state In contrast to a previously described SLR motif containing proteins that exist as monomers in solution, SEL1Lcent forms an intimate two-fold homotypic dimer interface (Figs 1B and 2A). RESULTS
104 113 SEL1Lcent structure_element In contrast to a previously described SLR motif containing proteins that exist as monomers in solution, SEL1Lcent forms an intimate two-fold homotypic dimer interface (Figs 1B and 2A). RESULTS
132 166 two-fold homotypic dimer interface site In contrast to a previously described SLR motif containing proteins that exist as monomers in solution, SEL1Lcent forms an intimate two-fold homotypic dimer interface (Figs 1B and 2A). RESULTS
4 19 concave surface site The concave surface of each SEL1L domain comprising helix 5A to 9A encircles its dimer counterpart in an interlocking clasp-like arrangement. RESULTS
28 33 SEL1L protein The concave surface of each SEL1L domain comprising helix 5A to 9A encircles its dimer counterpart in an interlocking clasp-like arrangement. RESULTS
52 66 helix 5A to 9A structure_element The concave surface of each SEL1L domain comprising helix 5A to 9A encircles its dimer counterpart in an interlocking clasp-like arrangement. RESULTS
81 86 dimer oligomeric_state The concave surface of each SEL1L domain comprising helix 5A to 9A encircles its dimer counterpart in an interlocking clasp-like arrangement. RESULTS
64 73 protomers oligomeric_state However, no interactions were seen between the two-fold-related protomers through the concave inner surfaces themselves. RESULTS
86 108 concave inner surfaces site However, no interactions were seen between the two-fold-related protomers through the concave inner surfaces themselves. RESULTS
32 43 SLR motif 9 structure_element Rather, the unique structure of SLR motif 9, consisting of two parallel helices (9A and 9B), is located in the space generated by the concave surface and provides an extensive dimerization interface between the two-fold-related molecules (Fig. 2A). RESULTS
81 83 9A structure_element Rather, the unique structure of SLR motif 9, consisting of two parallel helices (9A and 9B), is located in the space generated by the concave surface and provides an extensive dimerization interface between the two-fold-related molecules (Fig. 2A). RESULTS
88 90 9B structure_element Rather, the unique structure of SLR motif 9, consisting of two parallel helices (9A and 9B), is located in the space generated by the concave surface and provides an extensive dimerization interface between the two-fold-related molecules (Fig. 2A). RESULTS
134 149 concave surface site Rather, the unique structure of SLR motif 9, consisting of two parallel helices (9A and 9B), is located in the space generated by the concave surface and provides an extensive dimerization interface between the two-fold-related molecules (Fig. 2A). RESULTS
176 198 dimerization interface site Rather, the unique structure of SLR motif 9, consisting of two parallel helices (9A and 9B), is located in the space generated by the concave surface and provides an extensive dimerization interface between the two-fold-related molecules (Fig. 2A). RESULTS
0 8 Helix 9B structure_element Helix 9B from one protomer inserts into the empty space surrounded by the concave region in the other monomer, forming a domain-swapped conformation. RESULTS
18 26 protomer oligomeric_state Helix 9B from one protomer inserts into the empty space surrounded by the concave region in the other monomer, forming a domain-swapped conformation. RESULTS
74 88 concave region site Helix 9B from one protomer inserts into the empty space surrounded by the concave region in the other monomer, forming a domain-swapped conformation. RESULTS
102 109 monomer oligomeric_state Helix 9B from one protomer inserts into the empty space surrounded by the concave region in the other monomer, forming a domain-swapped conformation. RESULTS
121 135 domain-swapped protein_state Helix 9B from one protomer inserts into the empty space surrounded by the concave region in the other monomer, forming a domain-swapped conformation. RESULTS
12 30 contact interfaces site Three major contact interfaces are involved in the interactions, and all interfaces are symmetrically related between the dimer subunits (Fig. 2A). RESULTS
73 83 interfaces site Three major contact interfaces are involved in the interactions, and all interfaces are symmetrically related between the dimer subunits (Fig. 2A). RESULTS
122 127 dimer oligomeric_state Three major contact interfaces are involved in the interactions, and all interfaces are symmetrically related between the dimer subunits (Fig. 2A). RESULTS
0 34 Structure-based sequence alignment experimental_method Structure-based sequence alignment of 135 SEL1L phylogenetic sequences using a ConSurf server revealed that the surface residues in the dimer interfaces were highly conserved among the SEL1L orthologs (Fig. 1E). RESULTS
42 47 SEL1L protein Structure-based sequence alignment of 135 SEL1L phylogenetic sequences using a ConSurf server revealed that the surface residues in the dimer interfaces were highly conserved among the SEL1L orthologs (Fig. 1E). RESULTS
79 93 ConSurf server experimental_method Structure-based sequence alignment of 135 SEL1L phylogenetic sequences using a ConSurf server revealed that the surface residues in the dimer interfaces were highly conserved among the SEL1L orthologs (Fig. 1E). RESULTS
136 152 dimer interfaces site Structure-based sequence alignment of 135 SEL1L phylogenetic sequences using a ConSurf server revealed that the surface residues in the dimer interfaces were highly conserved among the SEL1L orthologs (Fig. 1E). RESULTS
158 174 highly conserved protein_state Structure-based sequence alignment of 135 SEL1L phylogenetic sequences using a ConSurf server revealed that the surface residues in the dimer interfaces were highly conserved among the SEL1L orthologs (Fig. 1E). RESULTS
185 190 SEL1L protein Structure-based sequence alignment of 135 SEL1L phylogenetic sequences using a ConSurf server revealed that the surface residues in the dimer interfaces were highly conserved among the SEL1L orthologs (Fig. 1E). RESULTS
7 15 helix 9B structure_element First, helix 9B of each SEL1Lcent subunit interacts with residues lining the inner groove from the SLR α-helices (5B, 6B, 7B, and 8B) from its counterpart. RESULTS
24 33 SEL1Lcent structure_element First, helix 9B of each SEL1Lcent subunit interacts with residues lining the inner groove from the SLR α-helices (5B, 6B, 7B, and 8B) from its counterpart. RESULTS
77 89 inner groove site First, helix 9B of each SEL1Lcent subunit interacts with residues lining the inner groove from the SLR α-helices (5B, 6B, 7B, and 8B) from its counterpart. RESULTS
99 102 SLR structure_element First, helix 9B of each SEL1Lcent subunit interacts with residues lining the inner groove from the SLR α-helices (5B, 6B, 7B, and 8B) from its counterpart. RESULTS
103 112 α-helices structure_element First, helix 9B of each SEL1Lcent subunit interacts with residues lining the inner groove from the SLR α-helices (5B, 6B, 7B, and 8B) from its counterpart. RESULTS
114 116 5B structure_element First, helix 9B of each SEL1Lcent subunit interacts with residues lining the inner groove from the SLR α-helices (5B, 6B, 7B, and 8B) from its counterpart. RESULTS
118 120 6B structure_element First, helix 9B of each SEL1Lcent subunit interacts with residues lining the inner groove from the SLR α-helices (5B, 6B, 7B, and 8B) from its counterpart. RESULTS
122 124 7B structure_element First, helix 9B of each SEL1Lcent subunit interacts with residues lining the inner groove from the SLR α-helices (5B, 6B, 7B, and 8B) from its counterpart. RESULTS
130 132 8B structure_element First, helix 9B of each SEL1Lcent subunit interacts with residues lining the inner groove from the SLR α-helices (5B, 6B, 7B, and 8B) from its counterpart. RESULTS
8 17 interface site In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
19 26 Leu 516 residue_name_number In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
31 38 Tyr 519 residue_name_number In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
42 50 helix 9B structure_element In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
85 109 hydrophobic interactions bond_interaction In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
115 122 Trp 478 residue_name_number In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
126 134 helix 8B structure_element In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
136 143 Val 444 residue_name_number In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
147 155 helix 7B structure_element In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
157 164 Phe 411 residue_name_number In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
168 176 helix 6B structure_element In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
182 189 Leu 380 residue_name_number In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
193 201 helix 5B structure_element In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
211 220 SEL1Lcent structure_element In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
243 254 Interface 1 site In this interface, Leu 516 and Tyr 519 on helix 9B are located in the center, making hydrophobic interactions with Trp 478 on helix 8B, Val 444 on helix 7B, Phe 411 on helix 6B, and Leu 380 on helix 5B from the SEL1Lcent counterpart (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
15 39 hydrophobic interactions bond_interaction In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chain hydroxyl group of Tyr 519 and the main-chain oxygen of Ile 515 form H-bonds to the side chain of the conserved Gln 377 and His 381 on helix 5B of the two-fold-related protomer. RESULTS
74 81 Tyr 519 residue_name_number In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chain hydroxyl group of Tyr 519 and the main-chain oxygen of Ile 515 form H-bonds to the side chain of the conserved Gln 377 and His 381 on helix 5B of the two-fold-related protomer. RESULTS
111 118 Ile 515 residue_name_number In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chain hydroxyl group of Tyr 519 and the main-chain oxygen of Ile 515 form H-bonds to the side chain of the conserved Gln 377 and His 381 on helix 5B of the two-fold-related protomer. RESULTS
124 131 H-bonds bond_interaction In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chain hydroxyl group of Tyr 519 and the main-chain oxygen of Ile 515 form H-bonds to the side chain of the conserved Gln 377 and His 381 on helix 5B of the two-fold-related protomer. RESULTS
157 166 conserved protein_state In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chain hydroxyl group of Tyr 519 and the main-chain oxygen of Ile 515 form H-bonds to the side chain of the conserved Gln 377 and His 381 on helix 5B of the two-fold-related protomer. RESULTS
167 174 Gln 377 residue_name_number In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chain hydroxyl group of Tyr 519 and the main-chain oxygen of Ile 515 form H-bonds to the side chain of the conserved Gln 377 and His 381 on helix 5B of the two-fold-related protomer. RESULTS
179 186 His 381 residue_name_number In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chain hydroxyl group of Tyr 519 and the main-chain oxygen of Ile 515 form H-bonds to the side chain of the conserved Gln 377 and His 381 on helix 5B of the two-fold-related protomer. RESULTS
190 198 helix 5B structure_element In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chain hydroxyl group of Tyr 519 and the main-chain oxygen of Ile 515 form H-bonds to the side chain of the conserved Gln 377 and His 381 on helix 5B of the two-fold-related protomer. RESULTS
223 231 protomer oligomeric_state In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chain hydroxyl group of Tyr 519 and the main-chain oxygen of Ile 515 form H-bonds to the side chain of the conserved Gln 377 and His 381 on helix 5B of the two-fold-related protomer. RESULTS
18 25 Gln 523 residue_name_number The side chain of Gln 523 forms an H-bond to the side chain of Asp 480 on the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
35 41 H-bond bond_interaction The side chain of Gln 523 forms an H-bond to the side chain of Asp 480 on the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
63 70 Asp 480 residue_name_number The side chain of Gln 523 forms an H-bond to the side chain of Asp 480 on the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
95 103 protomer oligomeric_state The side chain of Gln 523 forms an H-bond to the side chain of Asp 480 on the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
114 125 Interface 1 site The side chain of Gln 523 forms an H-bond to the side chain of Asp 480 on the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 1 detail). RESULTS
26 34 helix 9A structure_element Second, the residues from helix 9A interact with the residues from helix 5A of its counterpart in a head-to-tail orientation. RESULTS
67 75 helix 5A structure_element Second, the residues from helix 9A interact with the residues from helix 5A of its counterpart in a head-to-tail orientation. RESULTS
100 112 head-to-tail protein_state Second, the residues from helix 9A interact with the residues from helix 5A of its counterpart in a head-to-tail orientation. RESULTS
8 17 interface site In this interface, the interacting residues on helix 9A, including Leu 503, Tyr 499, and the aliphatic side chain of Lys 500, form an extensive network of van der Waals contacts with the hydrophobic residues of the counterpart helix 5A, including Tyr 360, Leu 356, Tyr 359, and Leu 363. RESULTS
47 55 helix 9A structure_element In this interface, the interacting residues on helix 9A, including Leu 503, Tyr 499, and the aliphatic side chain of Lys 500, form an extensive network of van der Waals contacts with the hydrophobic residues of the counterpart helix 5A, including Tyr 360, Leu 356, Tyr 359, and Leu 363. RESULTS
67 74 Leu 503 residue_name_number In this interface, the interacting residues on helix 9A, including Leu 503, Tyr 499, and the aliphatic side chain of Lys 500, form an extensive network of van der Waals contacts with the hydrophobic residues of the counterpart helix 5A, including Tyr 360, Leu 356, Tyr 359, and Leu 363. RESULTS
76 83 Tyr 499 residue_name_number In this interface, the interacting residues on helix 9A, including Leu 503, Tyr 499, and the aliphatic side chain of Lys 500, form an extensive network of van der Waals contacts with the hydrophobic residues of the counterpart helix 5A, including Tyr 360, Leu 356, Tyr 359, and Leu 363. RESULTS
117 124 Lys 500 residue_name_number In this interface, the interacting residues on helix 9A, including Leu 503, Tyr 499, and the aliphatic side chain of Lys 500, form an extensive network of van der Waals contacts with the hydrophobic residues of the counterpart helix 5A, including Tyr 360, Leu 356, Tyr 359, and Leu 363. RESULTS
155 177 van der Waals contacts bond_interaction In this interface, the interacting residues on helix 9A, including Leu 503, Tyr 499, and the aliphatic side chain of Lys 500, form an extensive network of van der Waals contacts with the hydrophobic residues of the counterpart helix 5A, including Tyr 360, Leu 356, Tyr 359, and Leu 363. RESULTS
227 235 helix 5A structure_element In this interface, the interacting residues on helix 9A, including Leu 503, Tyr 499, and the aliphatic side chain of Lys 500, form an extensive network of van der Waals contacts with the hydrophobic residues of the counterpart helix 5A, including Tyr 360, Leu 356, Tyr 359, and Leu 363. RESULTS
247 254 Tyr 360 residue_name_number In this interface, the interacting residues on helix 9A, including Leu 503, Tyr 499, and the aliphatic side chain of Lys 500, form an extensive network of van der Waals contacts with the hydrophobic residues of the counterpart helix 5A, including Tyr 360, Leu 356, Tyr 359, and Leu 363. RESULTS
256 263 Leu 356 residue_name_number In this interface, the interacting residues on helix 9A, including Leu 503, Tyr 499, and the aliphatic side chain of Lys 500, form an extensive network of van der Waals contacts with the hydrophobic residues of the counterpart helix 5A, including Tyr 360, Leu 356, Tyr 359, and Leu 363. RESULTS
265 272 Tyr 359 residue_name_number In this interface, the interacting residues on helix 9A, including Leu 503, Tyr 499, and the aliphatic side chain of Lys 500, form an extensive network of van der Waals contacts with the hydrophobic residues of the counterpart helix 5A, including Tyr 360, Leu 356, Tyr 359, and Leu 363. RESULTS
278 285 Leu 363 residue_name_number In this interface, the interacting residues on helix 9A, including Leu 503, Tyr 499, and the aliphatic side chain of Lys 500, form an extensive network of van der Waals contacts with the hydrophobic residues of the counterpart helix 5A, including Tyr 360, Leu 356, Tyr 359, and Leu 363. RESULTS
15 39 hydrophobic interactions bond_interaction In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chains of Asn 507 and Ser 510 on helix 9A make H-bonds with highly conserved Arg 384 in the loop between helix 5B and 6A from the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 2 detail). RESULTS
60 67 Asn 507 residue_name_number In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chains of Asn 507 and Ser 510 on helix 9A make H-bonds with highly conserved Arg 384 in the loop between helix 5B and 6A from the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 2 detail). RESULTS
72 79 Ser 510 residue_name_number In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chains of Asn 507 and Ser 510 on helix 9A make H-bonds with highly conserved Arg 384 in the loop between helix 5B and 6A from the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 2 detail). RESULTS
83 91 helix 9A structure_element In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chains of Asn 507 and Ser 510 on helix 9A make H-bonds with highly conserved Arg 384 in the loop between helix 5B and 6A from the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 2 detail). RESULTS
97 104 H-bonds bond_interaction In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chains of Asn 507 and Ser 510 on helix 9A make H-bonds with highly conserved Arg 384 in the loop between helix 5B and 6A from the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 2 detail). RESULTS
110 126 highly conserved protein_state In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chains of Asn 507 and Ser 510 on helix 9A make H-bonds with highly conserved Arg 384 in the loop between helix 5B and 6A from the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 2 detail). RESULTS
127 134 Arg 384 residue_name_number In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chains of Asn 507 and Ser 510 on helix 9A make H-bonds with highly conserved Arg 384 in the loop between helix 5B and 6A from the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 2 detail). RESULTS
142 146 loop structure_element In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chains of Asn 507 and Ser 510 on helix 9A make H-bonds with highly conserved Arg 384 in the loop between helix 5B and 6A from the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 2 detail). RESULTS
155 163 helix 5B structure_element In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chains of Asn 507 and Ser 510 on helix 9A make H-bonds with highly conserved Arg 384 in the loop between helix 5B and 6A from the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 2 detail). RESULTS
168 170 6A structure_element In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chains of Asn 507 and Ser 510 on helix 9A make H-bonds with highly conserved Arg 384 in the loop between helix 5B and 6A from the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 2 detail). RESULTS
197 205 protomer oligomeric_state In addition to hydrophobic interactions, the side chains of Asn 507 and Ser 510 on helix 9A make H-bonds with highly conserved Arg 384 in the loop between helix 5B and 6A from the two-fold-related protomer (Fig. 2A, Interface 2 detail). RESULTS
11 19 helix 9B structure_element Third, the helix 9B from each protomer is involved in the dimer interaction by forming a two-fold antiparallel symmetry. RESULTS
30 38 protomer oligomeric_state Third, the helix 9B from each protomer is involved in the dimer interaction by forming a two-fold antiparallel symmetry. RESULTS
58 63 dimer oligomeric_state Third, the helix 9B from each protomer is involved in the dimer interaction by forming a two-fold antiparallel symmetry. RESULTS
66 73 Phe 518 residue_name_number In particular, the side chains of hydrophobic residues, including Phe 518, Leu 521, and Met 524, are directed toward each other, where they make both inter- and intramolecular contacts (Fig. 2A, Interface 3 detail). RESULTS
75 82 Leu 521 residue_name_number In particular, the side chains of hydrophobic residues, including Phe 518, Leu 521, and Met 524, are directed toward each other, where they make both inter- and intramolecular contacts (Fig. 2A, Interface 3 detail). RESULTS
88 95 Met 524 residue_name_number In particular, the side chains of hydrophobic residues, including Phe 518, Leu 521, and Met 524, are directed toward each other, where they make both inter- and intramolecular contacts (Fig. 2A, Interface 3 detail). RESULTS
195 206 Interface 3 site In particular, the side chains of hydrophobic residues, including Phe 518, Leu 521, and Met 524, are directed toward each other, where they make both inter- and intramolecular contacts (Fig. 2A, Interface 3 detail). RESULTS
56 73 crystal structure evidence To further investigate the interactions observed in our crystal structure, we generated a C-terminal deletion mutant (SEL1L348–497) lacking SLR motif 9 (helix 9A and 9B) from SEL1Lcent for comparative analysis. RESULTS
101 116 deletion mutant protein_state To further investigate the interactions observed in our crystal structure, we generated a C-terminal deletion mutant (SEL1L348–497) lacking SLR motif 9 (helix 9A and 9B) from SEL1Lcent for comparative analysis. RESULTS
118 130 SEL1L348–497 mutant To further investigate the interactions observed in our crystal structure, we generated a C-terminal deletion mutant (SEL1L348–497) lacking SLR motif 9 (helix 9A and 9B) from SEL1Lcent for comparative analysis. RESULTS
132 139 lacking protein_state To further investigate the interactions observed in our crystal structure, we generated a C-terminal deletion mutant (SEL1L348–497) lacking SLR motif 9 (helix 9A and 9B) from SEL1Lcent for comparative analysis. RESULTS
140 151 SLR motif 9 structure_element To further investigate the interactions observed in our crystal structure, we generated a C-terminal deletion mutant (SEL1L348–497) lacking SLR motif 9 (helix 9A and 9B) from SEL1Lcent for comparative analysis. RESULTS
153 161 helix 9A structure_element To further investigate the interactions observed in our crystal structure, we generated a C-terminal deletion mutant (SEL1L348–497) lacking SLR motif 9 (helix 9A and 9B) from SEL1Lcent for comparative analysis. RESULTS
166 168 9B structure_element To further investigate the interactions observed in our crystal structure, we generated a C-terminal deletion mutant (SEL1L348–497) lacking SLR motif 9 (helix 9A and 9B) from SEL1Lcent for comparative analysis. RESULTS
175 184 SEL1Lcent structure_element To further investigate the interactions observed in our crystal structure, we generated a C-terminal deletion mutant (SEL1L348–497) lacking SLR motif 9 (helix 9A and 9B) from SEL1Lcent for comparative analysis. RESULTS
4 19 deletion mutant protein_state The deletion mutant and the wild-type SEL1Lcent showed no difference in spectra by CD spectroscopy, indicating that the deletion of the SLR motif 9 did not affect the secondary structure of SEL1Lcent (Supplementary Fig. 3). RESULTS
28 37 wild-type protein_state The deletion mutant and the wild-type SEL1Lcent showed no difference in spectra by CD spectroscopy, indicating that the deletion of the SLR motif 9 did not affect the secondary structure of SEL1Lcent (Supplementary Fig. 3). RESULTS
38 47 SEL1Lcent structure_element The deletion mutant and the wild-type SEL1Lcent showed no difference in spectra by CD spectroscopy, indicating that the deletion of the SLR motif 9 did not affect the secondary structure of SEL1Lcent (Supplementary Fig. 3). RESULTS
72 79 spectra evidence The deletion mutant and the wild-type SEL1Lcent showed no difference in spectra by CD spectroscopy, indicating that the deletion of the SLR motif 9 did not affect the secondary structure of SEL1Lcent (Supplementary Fig. 3). RESULTS
83 98 CD spectroscopy experimental_method The deletion mutant and the wild-type SEL1Lcent showed no difference in spectra by CD spectroscopy, indicating that the deletion of the SLR motif 9 did not affect the secondary structure of SEL1Lcent (Supplementary Fig. 3). RESULTS
120 128 deletion experimental_method The deletion mutant and the wild-type SEL1Lcent showed no difference in spectra by CD spectroscopy, indicating that the deletion of the SLR motif 9 did not affect the secondary structure of SEL1Lcent (Supplementary Fig. 3). RESULTS
136 147 SLR motif 9 structure_element The deletion mutant and the wild-type SEL1Lcent showed no difference in spectra by CD spectroscopy, indicating that the deletion of the SLR motif 9 did not affect the secondary structure of SEL1Lcent (Supplementary Fig. 3). RESULTS
190 199 SEL1Lcent structure_element The deletion mutant and the wild-type SEL1Lcent showed no difference in spectra by CD spectroscopy, indicating that the deletion of the SLR motif 9 did not affect the secondary structure of SEL1Lcent (Supplementary Fig. 3). RESULTS
13 19 mutant protein_state However, the mutant behaved as a monomer in size-exclusion chromatography and analytical ultracentrifugation experiments (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Fig. 2C). RESULTS
33 40 monomer oligomeric_state However, the mutant behaved as a monomer in size-exclusion chromatography and analytical ultracentrifugation experiments (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Fig. 2C). RESULTS
44 73 size-exclusion chromatography experimental_method However, the mutant behaved as a monomer in size-exclusion chromatography and analytical ultracentrifugation experiments (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Fig. 2C). RESULTS
78 108 analytical ultracentrifugation experimental_method However, the mutant behaved as a monomer in size-exclusion chromatography and analytical ultracentrifugation experiments (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Fig. 2C). RESULTS
63 68 dimer oligomeric_state Additionally, to further validate the key residues involved in dimer formation, we generated a triple point mutant (Interface 1, I515A, L516A, and Y519A) of the hydrophobic residues that are involved in dimerization. RESULTS
95 114 triple point mutant protein_state Additionally, to further validate the key residues involved in dimer formation, we generated a triple point mutant (Interface 1, I515A, L516A, and Y519A) of the hydrophobic residues that are involved in dimerization. RESULTS
116 127 Interface 1 site Additionally, to further validate the key residues involved in dimer formation, we generated a triple point mutant (Interface 1, I515A, L516A, and Y519A) of the hydrophobic residues that are involved in dimerization. RESULTS
129 134 I515A mutant Additionally, to further validate the key residues involved in dimer formation, we generated a triple point mutant (Interface 1, I515A, L516A, and Y519A) of the hydrophobic residues that are involved in dimerization. RESULTS
136 141 L516A mutant Additionally, to further validate the key residues involved in dimer formation, we generated a triple point mutant (Interface 1, I515A, L516A, and Y519A) of the hydrophobic residues that are involved in dimerization. RESULTS
147 152 Y519A mutant Additionally, to further validate the key residues involved in dimer formation, we generated a triple point mutant (Interface 1, I515A, L516A, and Y519A) of the hydrophobic residues that are involved in dimerization. RESULTS
203 215 dimerization oligomeric_state Additionally, to further validate the key residues involved in dimer formation, we generated a triple point mutant (Interface 1, I515A, L516A, and Y519A) of the hydrophobic residues that are involved in dimerization. RESULTS
4 23 triple point mutant protein_state The triple point mutant eluted at the monomer position upon size-exclusion chromatography, while the negative control point mutant (Q460A) eluted at the same position as the wild-type. RESULTS
38 45 monomer oligomeric_state The triple point mutant eluted at the monomer position upon size-exclusion chromatography, while the negative control point mutant (Q460A) eluted at the same position as the wild-type. RESULTS
60 89 size-exclusion chromatography experimental_method The triple point mutant eluted at the monomer position upon size-exclusion chromatography, while the negative control point mutant (Q460A) eluted at the same position as the wild-type. RESULTS
118 130 point mutant protein_state The triple point mutant eluted at the monomer position upon size-exclusion chromatography, while the negative control point mutant (Q460A) eluted at the same position as the wild-type. RESULTS
132 137 Q460A mutant The triple point mutant eluted at the monomer position upon size-exclusion chromatography, while the negative control point mutant (Q460A) eluted at the same position as the wild-type. RESULTS
174 183 wild-type protein_state The triple point mutant eluted at the monomer position upon size-exclusion chromatography, while the negative control point mutant (Q460A) eluted at the same position as the wild-type. RESULTS
11 34 single-residue mutation experimental_method Notably, a single-residue mutation (L521A in interface 3) abolished the dimerization of SEL1Lcent (Fig. 2B). RESULTS
36 41 L521A mutant Notably, a single-residue mutation (L521A in interface 3) abolished the dimerization of SEL1Lcent (Fig. 2B). RESULTS
45 56 interface 3 site Notably, a single-residue mutation (L521A in interface 3) abolished the dimerization of SEL1Lcent (Fig. 2B). RESULTS
58 84 abolished the dimerization protein_state Notably, a single-residue mutation (L521A in interface 3) abolished the dimerization of SEL1Lcent (Fig. 2B). RESULTS
88 97 SEL1Lcent structure_element Notably, a single-residue mutation (L521A in interface 3) abolished the dimerization of SEL1Lcent (Fig. 2B). RESULTS
0 7 Leu 521 residue_name_number Leu 521 is located in the dimerization center of the antiparallel 9B helices in the SEL1Lcent dimer. RESULTS
26 45 dimerization center site Leu 521 is located in the dimerization center of the antiparallel 9B helices in the SEL1Lcent dimer. RESULTS
66 76 9B helices structure_element Leu 521 is located in the dimerization center of the antiparallel 9B helices in the SEL1Lcent dimer. RESULTS
84 93 SEL1Lcent structure_element Leu 521 is located in the dimerization center of the antiparallel 9B helices in the SEL1Lcent dimer. RESULTS
94 99 dimer oligomeric_state Leu 521 is located in the dimerization center of the antiparallel 9B helices in the SEL1Lcent dimer. RESULTS
22 53 structural and biochemical data evidence Taken together, these structural and biochemical data demonstrate that SEL1Lcent exists as a dimer in solution and that SLR motif 9 in SEL1Lcent plays an important role in generating a two-fold dimerization interface. RESULTS
71 80 SEL1Lcent structure_element Taken together, these structural and biochemical data demonstrate that SEL1Lcent exists as a dimer in solution and that SLR motif 9 in SEL1Lcent plays an important role in generating a two-fold dimerization interface. RESULTS
93 98 dimer oligomeric_state Taken together, these structural and biochemical data demonstrate that SEL1Lcent exists as a dimer in solution and that SLR motif 9 in SEL1Lcent plays an important role in generating a two-fold dimerization interface. RESULTS
120 131 SLR motif 9 structure_element Taken together, these structural and biochemical data demonstrate that SEL1Lcent exists as a dimer in solution and that SLR motif 9 in SEL1Lcent plays an important role in generating a two-fold dimerization interface. RESULTS
135 144 SEL1Lcent structure_element Taken together, these structural and biochemical data demonstrate that SEL1Lcent exists as a dimer in solution and that SLR motif 9 in SEL1Lcent plays an important role in generating a two-fold dimerization interface. RESULTS
194 216 dimerization interface site Taken together, these structural and biochemical data demonstrate that SEL1Lcent exists as a dimer in solution and that SLR motif 9 in SEL1Lcent plays an important role in generating a two-fold dimerization interface. RESULTS
8 15 Glycine residue_name The Two Glycine Residues (G512 and G513) Create a Hinge for Domain Swapping of SLR Motif 9 RESULTS
26 30 G512 residue_name_number The Two Glycine Residues (G512 and G513) Create a Hinge for Domain Swapping of SLR Motif 9 RESULTS
35 39 G513 residue_name_number The Two Glycine Residues (G512 and G513) Create a Hinge for Domain Swapping of SLR Motif 9 RESULTS
50 55 Hinge structure_element The Two Glycine Residues (G512 and G513) Create a Hinge for Domain Swapping of SLR Motif 9 RESULTS
79 90 SLR Motif 9 structure_element The Two Glycine Residues (G512 and G513) Create a Hinge for Domain Swapping of SLR Motif 9 RESULTS
0 4 SLRs structure_element SLRs of mouse SEL1L were predicted using the TPRpred server. RESULTS
8 13 mouse taxonomy_domain SLRs of mouse SEL1L were predicted using the TPRpred server. RESULTS
14 19 SEL1L protein SLRs of mouse SEL1L were predicted using the TPRpred server. RESULTS
45 59 TPRpred server experimental_method SLRs of mouse SEL1L were predicted using the TPRpred server. RESULTS
25 36 full-length protein_state Based on the prediction, full-length SEL1L contains a total of 11 SLR motifs, and our construct corresponds to SLR motifs 5 through 9. RESULTS
37 42 SEL1L protein Based on the prediction, full-length SEL1L contains a total of 11 SLR motifs, and our construct corresponds to SLR motifs 5 through 9. RESULTS
66 69 SLR structure_element Based on the prediction, full-length SEL1L contains a total of 11 SLR motifs, and our construct corresponds to SLR motifs 5 through 9. RESULTS
111 133 SLR motifs 5 through 9 structure_element Based on the prediction, full-length SEL1L contains a total of 11 SLR motifs, and our construct corresponds to SLR motifs 5 through 9. RESULTS
35 43 helix 9A structure_element Although amino acid sequences from helix 9A and 9B correctly aligned with the regular SLR repeats and corresponded to SLR motif 9 (Fig. 3A), the structural arrangement of the two helices deviated from the common structure for the SLR motif. RESULTS
48 50 9B structure_element Although amino acid sequences from helix 9A and 9B correctly aligned with the regular SLR repeats and corresponded to SLR motif 9 (Fig. 3A), the structural arrangement of the two helices deviated from the common structure for the SLR motif. RESULTS
86 97 SLR repeats structure_element Although amino acid sequences from helix 9A and 9B correctly aligned with the regular SLR repeats and corresponded to SLR motif 9 (Fig. 3A), the structural arrangement of the two helices deviated from the common structure for the SLR motif. RESULTS
118 129 SLR motif 9 structure_element Although amino acid sequences from helix 9A and 9B correctly aligned with the regular SLR repeats and corresponded to SLR motif 9 (Fig. 3A), the structural arrangement of the two helices deviated from the common structure for the SLR motif. RESULTS
179 186 helices structure_element Although amino acid sequences from helix 9A and 9B correctly aligned with the regular SLR repeats and corresponded to SLR motif 9 (Fig. 3A), the structural arrangement of the two helices deviated from the common structure for the SLR motif. RESULTS
230 233 SLR structure_element Although amino acid sequences from helix 9A and 9B correctly aligned with the regular SLR repeats and corresponded to SLR motif 9 (Fig. 3A), the structural arrangement of the two helices deviated from the common structure for the SLR motif. RESULTS
17 34 crystal structure evidence According to our crystal structure, the central axis of helix 9B is almost parallel to that of helix 9A (Fig. 3B). RESULTS
56 64 helix 9B structure_element According to our crystal structure, the central axis of helix 9B is almost parallel to that of helix 9A (Fig. 3B). RESULTS
95 103 helix 9A structure_element According to our crystal structure, the central axis of helix 9B is almost parallel to that of helix 9A (Fig. 3B). RESULTS
38 49 SLR motif 9 structure_element However, this unusual conformation of SLR motif 9 seems to be essential for dimer formation, as described earlier. RESULTS
76 81 dimer oligomeric_state However, this unusual conformation of SLR motif 9 seems to be essential for dimer formation, as described earlier. RESULTS
53 60 Gly 512 residue_name_number For this structural geometry, two adjacent residues, Gly 512 and Gly 513, in SEL1L confer flexibility at this position by adopting main-chain dihedral angles that are disallowed for non-glycine residues. RESULTS
65 72 Gly 513 residue_name_number For this structural geometry, two adjacent residues, Gly 512 and Gly 513, in SEL1L confer flexibility at this position by adopting main-chain dihedral angles that are disallowed for non-glycine residues. RESULTS
77 82 SEL1L protein For this structural geometry, two adjacent residues, Gly 512 and Gly 513, in SEL1L confer flexibility at this position by adopting main-chain dihedral angles that are disallowed for non-glycine residues. RESULTS
47 54 Gly 512 residue_name_number The phi and psi dihedrals are 100° and 20° for Gly 512, and 110° and20° for Gly 513, respectively (Fig. 3C). RESULTS
78 85 Gly 513 residue_name_number The phi and psi dihedrals are 100° and 20° for Gly 512, and 110° and20° for Gly 513, respectively (Fig. 3C). RESULTS
0 7 Gly 513 residue_name_number Gly 513 is conserved among other SLR motifs in the SEL1Lcent, but Gly 512 is present only in the SLR motif 9 of SEL1Lcent (Fig. 3A). RESULTS
11 20 conserved protein_state Gly 513 is conserved among other SLR motifs in the SEL1Lcent, but Gly 512 is present only in the SLR motif 9 of SEL1Lcent (Fig. 3A). RESULTS
33 36 SLR structure_element Gly 513 is conserved among other SLR motifs in the SEL1Lcent, but Gly 512 is present only in the SLR motif 9 of SEL1Lcent (Fig. 3A). RESULTS
51 60 SEL1Lcent structure_element Gly 513 is conserved among other SLR motifs in the SEL1Lcent, but Gly 512 is present only in the SLR motif 9 of SEL1Lcent (Fig. 3A). RESULTS
66 73 Gly 512 residue_name_number Gly 513 is conserved among other SLR motifs in the SEL1Lcent, but Gly 512 is present only in the SLR motif 9 of SEL1Lcent (Fig. 3A). RESULTS
97 108 SLR motif 9 structure_element Gly 513 is conserved among other SLR motifs in the SEL1Lcent, but Gly 512 is present only in the SLR motif 9 of SEL1Lcent (Fig. 3A). RESULTS
112 121 SEL1Lcent structure_element Gly 513 is conserved among other SLR motifs in the SEL1Lcent, but Gly 512 is present only in the SLR motif 9 of SEL1Lcent (Fig. 3A). RESULTS
10 17 Gly-Gly structure_element Thus, the Gly-Gly residues generate an unusual sharp bend at the C-terminal SLR motif 9. RESULTS
76 87 SLR motif 9 structure_element Thus, the Gly-Gly residues generate an unusual sharp bend at the C-terminal SLR motif 9. RESULTS
21 28 glycine residue_name The involvement of a glycine residue in forming a hinge for domain swapping has been reported previously. RESULTS
50 55 hinge structure_element The involvement of a glycine residue in forming a hinge for domain swapping has been reported previously. RESULTS
20 27 Gly 513 residue_name_number The significance of Gly 513 is further highlighted by its absolute conservation among different species, including the budding yeast homolog Hrd3p. RESULTS
58 79 absolute conservation protein_state The significance of Gly 513 is further highlighted by its absolute conservation among different species, including the budding yeast homolog Hrd3p. RESULTS
119 132 budding yeast taxonomy_domain The significance of Gly 513 is further highlighted by its absolute conservation among different species, including the budding yeast homolog Hrd3p. RESULTS
141 146 Hrd3p protein The significance of Gly 513 is further highlighted by its absolute conservation among different species, including the budding yeast homolog Hrd3p. RESULTS
41 48 Gly 512 residue_name_number To further investigate the importance of Gly 512 and Gly 513 in the unusual SLR motif geometry, we generated a point mutation (Gly to Ala), which restricts the flexibility. Although the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are closely surrounded by helix 9B from the counter protomer, there is enough space for the side chain of alanine, suggesting that no steric hindrance would be caused by the mutation (Fig. 3C). RESULTS
53 60 Gly 513 residue_name_number To further investigate the importance of Gly 512 and Gly 513 in the unusual SLR motif geometry, we generated a point mutation (Gly to Ala), which restricts the flexibility. Although the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are closely surrounded by helix 9B from the counter protomer, there is enough space for the side chain of alanine, suggesting that no steric hindrance would be caused by the mutation (Fig. 3C). RESULTS
76 79 SLR structure_element To further investigate the importance of Gly 512 and Gly 513 in the unusual SLR motif geometry, we generated a point mutation (Gly to Ala), which restricts the flexibility. Although the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are closely surrounded by helix 9B from the counter protomer, there is enough space for the side chain of alanine, suggesting that no steric hindrance would be caused by the mutation (Fig. 3C). RESULTS
111 125 point mutation experimental_method To further investigate the importance of Gly 512 and Gly 513 in the unusual SLR motif geometry, we generated a point mutation (Gly to Ala), which restricts the flexibility. Although the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are closely surrounded by helix 9B from the counter protomer, there is enough space for the side chain of alanine, suggesting that no steric hindrance would be caused by the mutation (Fig. 3C). RESULTS
127 137 Gly to Ala mutant To further investigate the importance of Gly 512 and Gly 513 in the unusual SLR motif geometry, we generated a point mutation (Gly to Ala), which restricts the flexibility. Although the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are closely surrounded by helix 9B from the counter protomer, there is enough space for the side chain of alanine, suggesting that no steric hindrance would be caused by the mutation (Fig. 3C). RESULTS
186 193 Gly 512 residue_name_number To further investigate the importance of Gly 512 and Gly 513 in the unusual SLR motif geometry, we generated a point mutation (Gly to Ala), which restricts the flexibility. Although the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are closely surrounded by helix 9B from the counter protomer, there is enough space for the side chain of alanine, suggesting that no steric hindrance would be caused by the mutation (Fig. 3C). RESULTS
198 205 Gly 513 residue_name_number To further investigate the importance of Gly 512 and Gly 513 in the unusual SLR motif geometry, we generated a point mutation (Gly to Ala), which restricts the flexibility. Although the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are closely surrounded by helix 9B from the counter protomer, there is enough space for the side chain of alanine, suggesting that no steric hindrance would be caused by the mutation (Fig. 3C). RESULTS
241 249 helix 9B structure_element To further investigate the importance of Gly 512 and Gly 513 in the unusual SLR motif geometry, we generated a point mutation (Gly to Ala), which restricts the flexibility. Although the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are closely surrounded by helix 9B from the counter protomer, there is enough space for the side chain of alanine, suggesting that no steric hindrance would be caused by the mutation (Fig. 3C). RESULTS
267 275 protomer oligomeric_state To further investigate the importance of Gly 512 and Gly 513 in the unusual SLR motif geometry, we generated a point mutation (Gly to Ala), which restricts the flexibility. Although the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are closely surrounded by helix 9B from the counter protomer, there is enough space for the side chain of alanine, suggesting that no steric hindrance would be caused by the mutation (Fig. 3C). RESULTS
321 328 alanine residue_name To further investigate the importance of Gly 512 and Gly 513 in the unusual SLR motif geometry, we generated a point mutation (Gly to Ala), which restricts the flexibility. Although the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are closely surrounded by helix 9B from the counter protomer, there is enough space for the side chain of alanine, suggesting that no steric hindrance would be caused by the mutation (Fig. 3C). RESULTS
389 397 mutation experimental_method To further investigate the importance of Gly 512 and Gly 513 in the unusual SLR motif geometry, we generated a point mutation (Gly to Ala), which restricts the flexibility. Although the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are closely surrounded by helix 9B from the counter protomer, there is enough space for the side chain of alanine, suggesting that no steric hindrance would be caused by the mutation (Fig. 3C). RESULTS
34 42 mutation experimental_method This means that the effect of the mutation is mainly to generate a more restricted geometry at the hinge region. RESULTS
99 104 hinge structure_element This means that the effect of the mutation is mainly to generate a more restricted geometry at the hinge region. RESULTS
0 5 G512A mutant G512A or G513A alone showed no differences from wild-type in terms of the size-exclusion chromatography elution profile (Fig. 3D), suggesting that the restriction for single glycine flexibility would not be enough to break the swapped structure of helix 9B. RESULTS
9 14 G513A mutant G512A or G513A alone showed no differences from wild-type in terms of the size-exclusion chromatography elution profile (Fig. 3D), suggesting that the restriction for single glycine flexibility would not be enough to break the swapped structure of helix 9B. RESULTS
48 57 wild-type protein_state G512A or G513A alone showed no differences from wild-type in terms of the size-exclusion chromatography elution profile (Fig. 3D), suggesting that the restriction for single glycine flexibility would not be enough to break the swapped structure of helix 9B. RESULTS
74 103 size-exclusion chromatography experimental_method G512A or G513A alone showed no differences from wild-type in terms of the size-exclusion chromatography elution profile (Fig. 3D), suggesting that the restriction for single glycine flexibility would not be enough to break the swapped structure of helix 9B. RESULTS
174 181 glycine residue_name G512A or G513A alone showed no differences from wild-type in terms of the size-exclusion chromatography elution profile (Fig. 3D), suggesting that the restriction for single glycine flexibility would not be enough to break the swapped structure of helix 9B. RESULTS
248 256 helix 9B structure_element G512A or G513A alone showed no differences from wild-type in terms of the size-exclusion chromatography elution profile (Fig. 3D), suggesting that the restriction for single glycine flexibility would not be enough to break the swapped structure of helix 9B. RESULTS
13 26 double mutant protein_state However, the double mutant (G512A/G513A) eluted over a broad range and much earlier than the wild-type, suggesting that mutation of the residues involved in the hinge linking helix 9A and 9B significantly affected the geometry of helix 9B in generating domain swapping, and eventually altered the overall oligomeric state of SEL1Lcent into a polydisperse pattern (Fig. 3D, Supplementary Fig. 6). RESULTS
28 33 G512A mutant However, the double mutant (G512A/G513A) eluted over a broad range and much earlier than the wild-type, suggesting that mutation of the residues involved in the hinge linking helix 9A and 9B significantly affected the geometry of helix 9B in generating domain swapping, and eventually altered the overall oligomeric state of SEL1Lcent into a polydisperse pattern (Fig. 3D, Supplementary Fig. 6). RESULTS
34 39 G513A mutant However, the double mutant (G512A/G513A) eluted over a broad range and much earlier than the wild-type, suggesting that mutation of the residues involved in the hinge linking helix 9A and 9B significantly affected the geometry of helix 9B in generating domain swapping, and eventually altered the overall oligomeric state of SEL1Lcent into a polydisperse pattern (Fig. 3D, Supplementary Fig. 6). RESULTS
93 102 wild-type protein_state However, the double mutant (G512A/G513A) eluted over a broad range and much earlier than the wild-type, suggesting that mutation of the residues involved in the hinge linking helix 9A and 9B significantly affected the geometry of helix 9B in generating domain swapping, and eventually altered the overall oligomeric state of SEL1Lcent into a polydisperse pattern (Fig. 3D, Supplementary Fig. 6). RESULTS
120 128 mutation experimental_method However, the double mutant (G512A/G513A) eluted over a broad range and much earlier than the wild-type, suggesting that mutation of the residues involved in the hinge linking helix 9A and 9B significantly affected the geometry of helix 9B in generating domain swapping, and eventually altered the overall oligomeric state of SEL1Lcent into a polydisperse pattern (Fig. 3D, Supplementary Fig. 6). RESULTS
161 166 hinge structure_element However, the double mutant (G512A/G513A) eluted over a broad range and much earlier than the wild-type, suggesting that mutation of the residues involved in the hinge linking helix 9A and 9B significantly affected the geometry of helix 9B in generating domain swapping, and eventually altered the overall oligomeric state of SEL1Lcent into a polydisperse pattern (Fig. 3D, Supplementary Fig. 6). RESULTS
175 183 helix 9A structure_element However, the double mutant (G512A/G513A) eluted over a broad range and much earlier than the wild-type, suggesting that mutation of the residues involved in the hinge linking helix 9A and 9B significantly affected the geometry of helix 9B in generating domain swapping, and eventually altered the overall oligomeric state of SEL1Lcent into a polydisperse pattern (Fig. 3D, Supplementary Fig. 6). RESULTS
188 190 9B structure_element However, the double mutant (G512A/G513A) eluted over a broad range and much earlier than the wild-type, suggesting that mutation of the residues involved in the hinge linking helix 9A and 9B significantly affected the geometry of helix 9B in generating domain swapping, and eventually altered the overall oligomeric state of SEL1Lcent into a polydisperse pattern (Fig. 3D, Supplementary Fig. 6). RESULTS
230 238 helix 9B structure_element However, the double mutant (G512A/G513A) eluted over a broad range and much earlier than the wild-type, suggesting that mutation of the residues involved in the hinge linking helix 9A and 9B significantly affected the geometry of helix 9B in generating domain swapping, and eventually altered the overall oligomeric state of SEL1Lcent into a polydisperse pattern (Fig. 3D, Supplementary Fig. 6). RESULTS
325 334 SEL1Lcent structure_element However, the double mutant (G512A/G513A) eluted over a broad range and much earlier than the wild-type, suggesting that mutation of the residues involved in the hinge linking helix 9A and 9B significantly affected the geometry of helix 9B in generating domain swapping, and eventually altered the overall oligomeric state of SEL1Lcent into a polydisperse pattern (Fig. 3D, Supplementary Fig. 6). RESULTS
23 33 mutated to experimental_method When the residues were mutated to lysine (G512K/G513K), the mutant not only restricted the geometry of residues at the hinge but also generated steric hindrance during interaction with the counter protomer of SEL1Lcent, thereby inhibiting self-association of SEL1Lcent completely. RESULTS
34 40 lysine residue_name When the residues were mutated to lysine (G512K/G513K), the mutant not only restricted the geometry of residues at the hinge but also generated steric hindrance during interaction with the counter protomer of SEL1Lcent, thereby inhibiting self-association of SEL1Lcent completely. RESULTS
42 47 G512K mutant When the residues were mutated to lysine (G512K/G513K), the mutant not only restricted the geometry of residues at the hinge but also generated steric hindrance during interaction with the counter protomer of SEL1Lcent, thereby inhibiting self-association of SEL1Lcent completely. RESULTS
48 53 G513K mutant When the residues were mutated to lysine (G512K/G513K), the mutant not only restricted the geometry of residues at the hinge but also generated steric hindrance during interaction with the counter protomer of SEL1Lcent, thereby inhibiting self-association of SEL1Lcent completely. RESULTS
60 66 mutant protein_state When the residues were mutated to lysine (G512K/G513K), the mutant not only restricted the geometry of residues at the hinge but also generated steric hindrance during interaction with the counter protomer of SEL1Lcent, thereby inhibiting self-association of SEL1Lcent completely. RESULTS
119 124 hinge structure_element When the residues were mutated to lysine (G512K/G513K), the mutant not only restricted the geometry of residues at the hinge but also generated steric hindrance during interaction with the counter protomer of SEL1Lcent, thereby inhibiting self-association of SEL1Lcent completely. RESULTS
197 205 protomer oligomeric_state When the residues were mutated to lysine (G512K/G513K), the mutant not only restricted the geometry of residues at the hinge but also generated steric hindrance during interaction with the counter protomer of SEL1Lcent, thereby inhibiting self-association of SEL1Lcent completely. RESULTS
209 218 SEL1Lcent structure_element When the residues were mutated to lysine (G512K/G513K), the mutant not only restricted the geometry of residues at the hinge but also generated steric hindrance during interaction with the counter protomer of SEL1Lcent, thereby inhibiting self-association of SEL1Lcent completely. RESULTS
259 268 SEL1Lcent structure_element When the residues were mutated to lysine (G512K/G513K), the mutant not only restricted the geometry of residues at the hinge but also generated steric hindrance during interaction with the counter protomer of SEL1Lcent, thereby inhibiting self-association of SEL1Lcent completely. RESULTS
4 9 G512K mutant The G512K/G513K double mutant eluted at the monomer position in size-exclusion chromatography (Fig. 3D). RESULTS
10 15 G513K mutant The G512K/G513K double mutant eluted at the monomer position in size-exclusion chromatography (Fig. 3D). RESULTS
16 29 double mutant protein_state The G512K/G513K double mutant eluted at the monomer position in size-exclusion chromatography (Fig. 3D). RESULTS
44 51 monomer oligomeric_state The G512K/G513K double mutant eluted at the monomer position in size-exclusion chromatography (Fig. 3D). RESULTS
64 93 size-exclusion chromatography experimental_method The G512K/G513K double mutant eluted at the monomer position in size-exclusion chromatography (Fig. 3D). RESULTS
61 69 mutation experimental_method A previous study shows that induction of steric hindrance by mutation destabilizes the dimerization interface of a different protein, ClC transporter. RESULTS
87 109 dimerization interface site A previous study shows that induction of steric hindrance by mutation destabilizes the dimerization interface of a different protein, ClC transporter. RESULTS
134 149 ClC transporter protein_type A previous study shows that induction of steric hindrance by mutation destabilizes the dimerization interface of a different protein, ClC transporter. RESULTS
42 49 Gly 512 residue_name_number Collectively, these data suggest that the Gly 512 and Gly 513 at the connection between helix 9A and 9B play a crucial role in forming the domain-swapped conformation that enables dimer formation. RESULTS
54 61 Gly 513 residue_name_number Collectively, these data suggest that the Gly 512 and Gly 513 at the connection between helix 9A and 9B play a crucial role in forming the domain-swapped conformation that enables dimer formation. RESULTS
88 96 helix 9A structure_element Collectively, these data suggest that the Gly 512 and Gly 513 at the connection between helix 9A and 9B play a crucial role in forming the domain-swapped conformation that enables dimer formation. RESULTS
101 103 9B structure_element Collectively, these data suggest that the Gly 512 and Gly 513 at the connection between helix 9A and 9B play a crucial role in forming the domain-swapped conformation that enables dimer formation. RESULTS
139 153 domain-swapped protein_state Collectively, these data suggest that the Gly 512 and Gly 513 at the connection between helix 9A and 9B play a crucial role in forming the domain-swapped conformation that enables dimer formation. RESULTS
180 185 dimer oligomeric_state Collectively, these data suggest that the Gly 512 and Gly 513 at the connection between helix 9A and 9B play a crucial role in forming the domain-swapped conformation that enables dimer formation. RESULTS
0 5 SEL1L protein SEL1L Forms Self-oligomers through SEL1Lcent domain in vivo RESULTS
12 26 Self-oligomers oligomeric_state SEL1L Forms Self-oligomers through SEL1Lcent domain in vivo RESULTS
35 44 SEL1Lcent structure_element SEL1L Forms Self-oligomers through SEL1Lcent domain in vivo RESULTS
21 26 SEL1L protein Next, we examined if SEL1L also forms self-oligomers in vivo using HEK293T cells. RESULTS
38 52 self-oligomers oligomeric_state Next, we examined if SEL1L also forms self-oligomers in vivo using HEK293T cells. RESULTS
13 24 full-length protein_state We generated full-length SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG fusion constructs and co-transfected the constructs into HEK293T cells. RESULTS
25 30 SEL1L protein We generated full-length SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG fusion constructs and co-transfected the constructs into HEK293T cells. RESULTS
31 33 HA experimental_method We generated full-length SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG fusion constructs and co-transfected the constructs into HEK293T cells. RESULTS
38 43 SEL1L protein We generated full-length SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG fusion constructs and co-transfected the constructs into HEK293T cells. RESULTS
44 48 FLAG experimental_method We generated full-length SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG fusion constructs and co-transfected the constructs into HEK293T cells. RESULTS
49 66 fusion constructs experimental_method We generated full-length SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG fusion constructs and co-transfected the constructs into HEK293T cells. RESULTS
71 85 co-transfected experimental_method We generated full-length SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG fusion constructs and co-transfected the constructs into HEK293T cells. RESULTS
2 30 co-immunoprecipitation assay experimental_method A co-immunoprecipitation assay using an anti-FLAG antibody followed by Western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody showed that full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers in vivo (Fig. 4A). RESULTS
45 49 FLAG experimental_method A co-immunoprecipitation assay using an anti-FLAG antibody followed by Western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody showed that full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers in vivo (Fig. 4A). RESULTS
71 83 Western blot experimental_method A co-immunoprecipitation assay using an anti-FLAG antibody followed by Western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody showed that full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers in vivo (Fig. 4A). RESULTS
107 109 HA experimental_method A co-immunoprecipitation assay using an anti-FLAG antibody followed by Western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody showed that full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers in vivo (Fig. 4A). RESULTS
131 142 full-length protein_state A co-immunoprecipitation assay using an anti-FLAG antibody followed by Western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody showed that full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers in vivo (Fig. 4A). RESULTS
143 148 SEL1L protein A co-immunoprecipitation assay using an anti-FLAG antibody followed by Western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody showed that full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers in vivo (Fig. 4A). RESULTS
155 169 self-oligomers oligomeric_state A co-immunoprecipitation assay using an anti-FLAG antibody followed by Western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody showed that full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers in vivo (Fig. 4A). RESULTS
31 40 SEL1Lcent structure_element To further examine whether the SEL1Lcent domain is sufficient to physically interact with full-length SEL1L, we generated SEL1Lcent and SLR motif 9 deletion (SEL1L348–497) construct, which were fused to the C-terminus of SEL1L signal peptides. RESULTS
90 101 full-length protein_state To further examine whether the SEL1Lcent domain is sufficient to physically interact with full-length SEL1L, we generated SEL1Lcent and SLR motif 9 deletion (SEL1L348–497) construct, which were fused to the C-terminus of SEL1L signal peptides. RESULTS
102 107 SEL1L protein To further examine whether the SEL1Lcent domain is sufficient to physically interact with full-length SEL1L, we generated SEL1Lcent and SLR motif 9 deletion (SEL1L348–497) construct, which were fused to the C-terminus of SEL1L signal peptides. RESULTS
122 131 SEL1Lcent structure_element To further examine whether the SEL1Lcent domain is sufficient to physically interact with full-length SEL1L, we generated SEL1Lcent and SLR motif 9 deletion (SEL1L348–497) construct, which were fused to the C-terminus of SEL1L signal peptides. RESULTS
136 147 SLR motif 9 structure_element To further examine whether the SEL1Lcent domain is sufficient to physically interact with full-length SEL1L, we generated SEL1Lcent and SLR motif 9 deletion (SEL1L348–497) construct, which were fused to the C-terminus of SEL1L signal peptides. RESULTS
148 156 deletion experimental_method To further examine whether the SEL1Lcent domain is sufficient to physically interact with full-length SEL1L, we generated SEL1Lcent and SLR motif 9 deletion (SEL1L348–497) construct, which were fused to the C-terminus of SEL1L signal peptides. RESULTS
158 170 SEL1L348–497 mutant To further examine whether the SEL1Lcent domain is sufficient to physically interact with full-length SEL1L, we generated SEL1Lcent and SLR motif 9 deletion (SEL1L348–497) construct, which were fused to the C-terminus of SEL1L signal peptides. RESULTS
194 202 fused to experimental_method To further examine whether the SEL1Lcent domain is sufficient to physically interact with full-length SEL1L, we generated SEL1Lcent and SLR motif 9 deletion (SEL1L348–497) construct, which were fused to the C-terminus of SEL1L signal peptides. RESULTS
221 226 SEL1L protein To further examine whether the SEL1Lcent domain is sufficient to physically interact with full-length SEL1L, we generated SEL1Lcent and SLR motif 9 deletion (SEL1L348–497) construct, which were fused to the C-terminus of SEL1L signal peptides. RESULTS
227 242 signal peptides structure_element To further examine whether the SEL1Lcent domain is sufficient to physically interact with full-length SEL1L, we generated SEL1Lcent and SLR motif 9 deletion (SEL1L348–497) construct, which were fused to the C-terminus of SEL1L signal peptides. RESULTS
0 31 Co-immunoprecipitation analysis experimental_method Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that the SEL1Lcent was sufficient to physically interact with the full-length SEL1L, while SEL1L348–497 failed to do so (Fig. 4A). RESULTS
48 57 SEL1Lcent structure_element Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that the SEL1Lcent was sufficient to physically interact with the full-length SEL1L, while SEL1L348–497 failed to do so (Fig. 4A). RESULTS
105 116 full-length protein_state Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that the SEL1Lcent was sufficient to physically interact with the full-length SEL1L, while SEL1L348–497 failed to do so (Fig. 4A). RESULTS
117 122 SEL1L protein Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that the SEL1Lcent was sufficient to physically interact with the full-length SEL1L, while SEL1L348–497 failed to do so (Fig. 4A). RESULTS
130 142 SEL1L348–497 mutant Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that the SEL1Lcent was sufficient to physically interact with the full-length SEL1L, while SEL1L348–497 failed to do so (Fig. 4A). RESULTS
48 60 SEL1L348–497 mutant Interestingly, however, the expression level of SEL1L348–497 was consistently lower than that of SEL1Lcent (Fig. 4A,B). RESULTS
97 106 SEL1Lcent structure_element Interestingly, however, the expression level of SEL1L348–497 was consistently lower than that of SEL1Lcent (Fig. 4A,B). RESULTS
0 24 Semi-quantitative RT-PCR experimental_method Semi-quantitative RT-PCR revealed no significant difference in transcriptional levels of the two constructs (data not shown). RESULTS
19 31 SEL1L348–497 mutant We speculated that SEL1L348–497 could be secreted while the SEL1Lcent is retained in the ER by association with the endogenous ERAD complex. RESULTS
60 69 SEL1Lcent structure_element We speculated that SEL1L348–497 could be secreted while the SEL1Lcent is retained in the ER by association with the endogenous ERAD complex. RESULTS
8 27 immunoprecipitation experimental_method Indeed, immunoprecipitation followed by western blot analysis using the culture medium detected secreted SEL1L348–497 fragment, but not SEL1Lcent (Fig. 4B). RESULTS
40 52 western blot experimental_method Indeed, immunoprecipitation followed by western blot analysis using the culture medium detected secreted SEL1L348–497 fragment, but not SEL1Lcent (Fig. 4B). RESULTS
105 117 SEL1L348–497 mutant Indeed, immunoprecipitation followed by western blot analysis using the culture medium detected secreted SEL1L348–497 fragment, but not SEL1Lcent (Fig. 4B). RESULTS
136 145 SEL1Lcent structure_element Indeed, immunoprecipitation followed by western blot analysis using the culture medium detected secreted SEL1L348–497 fragment, but not SEL1Lcent (Fig. 4B). RESULTS
35 47 SEL1L348–497 mutant We next examined if the reason why SEL1L348–497 failed to bind to the full-length SEL1L may be because of the lower level of SEL1L348–497 in the ER lumen compared to SEL1Lcent fragment. RESULTS
70 81 full-length protein_state We next examined if the reason why SEL1L348–497 failed to bind to the full-length SEL1L may be because of the lower level of SEL1L348–497 in the ER lumen compared to SEL1Lcent fragment. RESULTS
82 87 SEL1L protein We next examined if the reason why SEL1L348–497 failed to bind to the full-length SEL1L may be because of the lower level of SEL1L348–497 in the ER lumen compared to SEL1Lcent fragment. RESULTS
125 137 SEL1L348–497 mutant We next examined if the reason why SEL1L348–497 failed to bind to the full-length SEL1L may be because of the lower level of SEL1L348–497 in the ER lumen compared to SEL1Lcent fragment. RESULTS
166 175 SEL1Lcent structure_element We next examined if the reason why SEL1L348–497 failed to bind to the full-length SEL1L may be because of the lower level of SEL1L348–497 in the ER lumen compared to SEL1Lcent fragment. RESULTS
23 28 SEL1L protein In order to retain two SEL1L fragments in the ER lumen, we added KDEL ER retention sequence to the C-terminus of both fragments. RESULTS
65 69 KDEL structure_element In order to retain two SEL1L fragments in the ER lumen, we added KDEL ER retention sequence to the C-terminus of both fragments. RESULTS
70 91 ER retention sequence structure_element In order to retain two SEL1L fragments in the ER lumen, we added KDEL ER retention sequence to the C-terminus of both fragments. RESULTS
24 28 KDEL structure_element Indeed, the addition of KDEL peptide increased the level of SEL1L348–497 in the ER lumen (Fig. 4D,E) and the immunostaining analysis showed both constructs were well localized to the ER (Fig. 4C). RESULTS
60 72 SEL1L348–497 mutant Indeed, the addition of KDEL peptide increased the level of SEL1L348–497 in the ER lumen (Fig. 4D,E) and the immunostaining analysis showed both constructs were well localized to the ER (Fig. 4C). RESULTS
109 123 immunostaining experimental_method Indeed, the addition of KDEL peptide increased the level of SEL1L348–497 in the ER lumen (Fig. 4D,E) and the immunostaining analysis showed both constructs were well localized to the ER (Fig. 4C). RESULTS
28 37 SEL1Lcent structure_element We further analyzed whether SEL1Lcent may competitively inhibit the self-oligomerization of SEL1L in vivo. RESULTS
92 97 SEL1L protein We further analyzed whether SEL1Lcent may competitively inhibit the self-oligomerization of SEL1L in vivo. RESULTS
16 30 co-transfected experimental_method To this end, we co-transfected the differentially tagged full-length SEL1L (SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG) and increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-KDEL, SEL1L348–497-KDEL or SEL1Lcent (L521A)-KDEL, respectively. RESULTS
50 56 tagged protein_state To this end, we co-transfected the differentially tagged full-length SEL1L (SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG) and increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-KDEL, SEL1L348–497-KDEL or SEL1Lcent (L521A)-KDEL, respectively. RESULTS
57 68 full-length protein_state To this end, we co-transfected the differentially tagged full-length SEL1L (SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG) and increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-KDEL, SEL1L348–497-KDEL or SEL1Lcent (L521A)-KDEL, respectively. RESULTS
69 74 SEL1L protein To this end, we co-transfected the differentially tagged full-length SEL1L (SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG) and increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-KDEL, SEL1L348–497-KDEL or SEL1Lcent (L521A)-KDEL, respectively. RESULTS
76 81 SEL1L protein To this end, we co-transfected the differentially tagged full-length SEL1L (SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG) and increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-KDEL, SEL1L348–497-KDEL or SEL1Lcent (L521A)-KDEL, respectively. RESULTS
82 84 HA experimental_method To this end, we co-transfected the differentially tagged full-length SEL1L (SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG) and increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-KDEL, SEL1L348–497-KDEL or SEL1Lcent (L521A)-KDEL, respectively. RESULTS
89 94 SEL1L protein To this end, we co-transfected the differentially tagged full-length SEL1L (SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG) and increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-KDEL, SEL1L348–497-KDEL or SEL1Lcent (L521A)-KDEL, respectively. RESULTS
95 99 FLAG experimental_method To this end, we co-transfected the differentially tagged full-length SEL1L (SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG) and increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-KDEL, SEL1L348–497-KDEL or SEL1Lcent (L521A)-KDEL, respectively. RESULTS
105 121 increasing doses experimental_method To this end, we co-transfected the differentially tagged full-length SEL1L (SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG) and increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-KDEL, SEL1L348–497-KDEL or SEL1Lcent (L521A)-KDEL, respectively. RESULTS
125 139 SEL1Lcent-KDEL mutant To this end, we co-transfected the differentially tagged full-length SEL1L (SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG) and increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-KDEL, SEL1L348–497-KDEL or SEL1Lcent (L521A)-KDEL, respectively. RESULTS
141 158 SEL1L348–497-KDEL mutant To this end, we co-transfected the differentially tagged full-length SEL1L (SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG) and increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-KDEL, SEL1L348–497-KDEL or SEL1Lcent (L521A)-KDEL, respectively. RESULTS
162 184 SEL1Lcent (L521A)-KDEL mutant To this end, we co-transfected the differentially tagged full-length SEL1L (SEL1L-HA and SEL1L-FLAG) and increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-KDEL, SEL1L348–497-KDEL or SEL1Lcent (L521A)-KDEL, respectively. RESULTS
0 28 Co-immunoprecipitation assay experimental_method Co-immunoprecipitation assay revealed that wild-type SEL1Lcent-KDEL, indeed, competitively disrupted the self-association of the full-length SEL1L (Fig. 4E). RESULTS
43 52 wild-type protein_state Co-immunoprecipitation assay revealed that wild-type SEL1Lcent-KDEL, indeed, competitively disrupted the self-association of the full-length SEL1L (Fig. 4E). RESULTS
53 67 SEL1Lcent-KDEL mutant Co-immunoprecipitation assay revealed that wild-type SEL1Lcent-KDEL, indeed, competitively disrupted the self-association of the full-length SEL1L (Fig. 4E). RESULTS
129 140 full-length protein_state Co-immunoprecipitation assay revealed that wild-type SEL1Lcent-KDEL, indeed, competitively disrupted the self-association of the full-length SEL1L (Fig. 4E). RESULTS
13 30 SEL1L348–497-KDEL mutant In contrast, SEL1L348–497-KDEL and the single-residue mutation L521A in SEL1Lcent did not competitively inhibit the self-association of full-length SEL1L (Fig. 4E,F). RESULTS
63 68 L521A mutant In contrast, SEL1L348–497-KDEL and the single-residue mutation L521A in SEL1Lcent did not competitively inhibit the self-association of full-length SEL1L (Fig. 4E,F). RESULTS
72 81 SEL1Lcent structure_element In contrast, SEL1L348–497-KDEL and the single-residue mutation L521A in SEL1Lcent did not competitively inhibit the self-association of full-length SEL1L (Fig. 4E,F). RESULTS
136 147 full-length protein_state In contrast, SEL1L348–497-KDEL and the single-residue mutation L521A in SEL1Lcent did not competitively inhibit the self-association of full-length SEL1L (Fig. 4E,F). RESULTS
148 153 SEL1L protein In contrast, SEL1L348–497-KDEL and the single-residue mutation L521A in SEL1Lcent did not competitively inhibit the self-association of full-length SEL1L (Fig. 4E,F). RESULTS
28 33 SEL1L protein These data suggest that the SEL1L forms self-oligomers and the oligomerization is mediated by the SEL1Lcent domain in vivo. RESULTS
40 54 self-oligomers oligomeric_state These data suggest that the SEL1L forms self-oligomers and the oligomerization is mediated by the SEL1Lcent domain in vivo. RESULTS
98 107 SEL1Lcent structure_element These data suggest that the SEL1L forms self-oligomers and the oligomerization is mediated by the SEL1Lcent domain in vivo. RESULTS
0 21 Structural Comparison experimental_method Structural Comparison of SEL1L SLRs with TPRs or SLRs of Other Proteins RESULTS
25 30 SEL1L protein Structural Comparison of SEL1L SLRs with TPRs or SLRs of Other Proteins RESULTS
31 35 SLRs structure_element Structural Comparison of SEL1L SLRs with TPRs or SLRs of Other Proteins RESULTS
41 45 TPRs structure_element Structural Comparison of SEL1L SLRs with TPRs or SLRs of Other Proteins RESULTS
49 53 SLRs structure_element Structural Comparison of SEL1L SLRs with TPRs or SLRs of Other Proteins RESULTS
29 33 TPRs structure_element Previous studies reveal that TPRs and SLRs have similar consensus sequences, suggesting that their three-dimensional structures are also similar. RESULTS
38 42 SLRs structure_element Previous studies reveal that TPRs and SLRs have similar consensus sequences, suggesting that their three-dimensional structures are also similar. RESULTS
4 17 superposition experimental_method The superposition of isolated TPRs from Cdc23 (S. pombe, cell division cycle 23 homolog, PDB code 3ZN3) and SLRs from HcpC (Helicobacter Cysteine-rich Protein C, PDB code 1OUV) yields RMSDs below 1 Å, confirming that the isolated repeats are indeed similar. RESULTS
30 34 TPRs structure_element The superposition of isolated TPRs from Cdc23 (S. pombe, cell division cycle 23 homolog, PDB code 3ZN3) and SLRs from HcpC (Helicobacter Cysteine-rich Protein C, PDB code 1OUV) yields RMSDs below 1 Å, confirming that the isolated repeats are indeed similar. RESULTS
40 45 Cdc23 protein The superposition of isolated TPRs from Cdc23 (S. pombe, cell division cycle 23 homolog, PDB code 3ZN3) and SLRs from HcpC (Helicobacter Cysteine-rich Protein C, PDB code 1OUV) yields RMSDs below 1 Å, confirming that the isolated repeats are indeed similar. RESULTS
47 55 S. pombe species The superposition of isolated TPRs from Cdc23 (S. pombe, cell division cycle 23 homolog, PDB code 3ZN3) and SLRs from HcpC (Helicobacter Cysteine-rich Protein C, PDB code 1OUV) yields RMSDs below 1 Å, confirming that the isolated repeats are indeed similar. RESULTS
57 79 cell division cycle 23 protein The superposition of isolated TPRs from Cdc23 (S. pombe, cell division cycle 23 homolog, PDB code 3ZN3) and SLRs from HcpC (Helicobacter Cysteine-rich Protein C, PDB code 1OUV) yields RMSDs below 1 Å, confirming that the isolated repeats are indeed similar. RESULTS
108 112 SLRs structure_element The superposition of isolated TPRs from Cdc23 (S. pombe, cell division cycle 23 homolog, PDB code 3ZN3) and SLRs from HcpC (Helicobacter Cysteine-rich Protein C, PDB code 1OUV) yields RMSDs below 1 Å, confirming that the isolated repeats are indeed similar. RESULTS
118 122 HcpC protein The superposition of isolated TPRs from Cdc23 (S. pombe, cell division cycle 23 homolog, PDB code 3ZN3) and SLRs from HcpC (Helicobacter Cysteine-rich Protein C, PDB code 1OUV) yields RMSDs below 1 Å, confirming that the isolated repeats are indeed similar. RESULTS
124 160 Helicobacter Cysteine-rich Protein C protein The superposition of isolated TPRs from Cdc23 (S. pombe, cell division cycle 23 homolog, PDB code 3ZN3) and SLRs from HcpC (Helicobacter Cysteine-rich Protein C, PDB code 1OUV) yields RMSDs below 1 Å, confirming that the isolated repeats are indeed similar. RESULTS
184 189 RMSDs evidence The superposition of isolated TPRs from Cdc23 (S. pombe, cell division cycle 23 homolog, PDB code 3ZN3) and SLRs from HcpC (Helicobacter Cysteine-rich Protein C, PDB code 1OUV) yields RMSDs below 1 Å, confirming that the isolated repeats are indeed similar. RESULTS
20 23 SLR structure_element This is relevant to SLR motifs in SEL1L, as isolated SLR motifs from SEL1Lcent showed good structural alignment with isolated TPRs (RMSD 1.6 Å for all Cα chains) from Cdc23N-term and SLRs (RMSD 0.6 Å for all Cα chains) from HcpC (Fig. 5A). RESULTS
34 39 SEL1L protein This is relevant to SLR motifs in SEL1L, as isolated SLR motifs from SEL1Lcent showed good structural alignment with isolated TPRs (RMSD 1.6 Å for all Cα chains) from Cdc23N-term and SLRs (RMSD 0.6 Å for all Cα chains) from HcpC (Fig. 5A). RESULTS
53 56 SLR structure_element This is relevant to SLR motifs in SEL1L, as isolated SLR motifs from SEL1Lcent showed good structural alignment with isolated TPRs (RMSD 1.6 Å for all Cα chains) from Cdc23N-term and SLRs (RMSD 0.6 Å for all Cα chains) from HcpC (Fig. 5A). RESULTS
69 78 SEL1Lcent structure_element This is relevant to SLR motifs in SEL1L, as isolated SLR motifs from SEL1Lcent showed good structural alignment with isolated TPRs (RMSD 1.6 Å for all Cα chains) from Cdc23N-term and SLRs (RMSD 0.6 Å for all Cα chains) from HcpC (Fig. 5A). RESULTS
91 111 structural alignment experimental_method This is relevant to SLR motifs in SEL1L, as isolated SLR motifs from SEL1Lcent showed good structural alignment with isolated TPRs (RMSD 1.6 Å for all Cα chains) from Cdc23N-term and SLRs (RMSD 0.6 Å for all Cα chains) from HcpC (Fig. 5A). RESULTS
126 130 TPRs structure_element This is relevant to SLR motifs in SEL1L, as isolated SLR motifs from SEL1Lcent showed good structural alignment with isolated TPRs (RMSD 1.6 Å for all Cα chains) from Cdc23N-term and SLRs (RMSD 0.6 Å for all Cα chains) from HcpC (Fig. 5A). RESULTS
132 136 RMSD evidence This is relevant to SLR motifs in SEL1L, as isolated SLR motifs from SEL1Lcent showed good structural alignment with isolated TPRs (RMSD 1.6 Å for all Cα chains) from Cdc23N-term and SLRs (RMSD 0.6 Å for all Cα chains) from HcpC (Fig. 5A). RESULTS
167 172 Cdc23 protein This is relevant to SLR motifs in SEL1L, as isolated SLR motifs from SEL1Lcent showed good structural alignment with isolated TPRs (RMSD 1.6 Å for all Cα chains) from Cdc23N-term and SLRs (RMSD 0.6 Å for all Cα chains) from HcpC (Fig. 5A). RESULTS
183 187 SLRs structure_element This is relevant to SLR motifs in SEL1L, as isolated SLR motifs from SEL1Lcent showed good structural alignment with isolated TPRs (RMSD 1.6 Å for all Cα chains) from Cdc23N-term and SLRs (RMSD 0.6 Å for all Cα chains) from HcpC (Fig. 5A). RESULTS
189 193 RMSD evidence This is relevant to SLR motifs in SEL1L, as isolated SLR motifs from SEL1Lcent showed good structural alignment with isolated TPRs (RMSD 1.6 Å for all Cα chains) from Cdc23N-term and SLRs (RMSD 0.6 Å for all Cα chains) from HcpC (Fig. 5A). RESULTS
224 228 HcpC protein This is relevant to SLR motifs in SEL1L, as isolated SLR motifs from SEL1Lcent showed good structural alignment with isolated TPRs (RMSD 1.6 Å for all Cα chains) from Cdc23N-term and SLRs (RMSD 0.6 Å for all Cα chains) from HcpC (Fig. 5A). RESULTS
9 22 superimposing experimental_method However, superimposing the structure of SLR motifs 5 to 9 from SEL1Lcent onto the overall Cdc23N-term or full-length HcpC structures revealed that SLR motifs 5 to 9 in SEL1Lcent have a different superhelical structure than either Cdc23 or HcpC (RMSD values of >2.5 Å for Cα atoms) (Fig. 5B). RESULTS
27 36 structure evidence However, superimposing the structure of SLR motifs 5 to 9 from SEL1Lcent onto the overall Cdc23N-term or full-length HcpC structures revealed that SLR motifs 5 to 9 in SEL1Lcent have a different superhelical structure than either Cdc23 or HcpC (RMSD values of >2.5 Å for Cα atoms) (Fig. 5B). RESULTS
40 57 SLR motifs 5 to 9 structure_element However, superimposing the structure of SLR motifs 5 to 9 from SEL1Lcent onto the overall Cdc23N-term or full-length HcpC structures revealed that SLR motifs 5 to 9 in SEL1Lcent have a different superhelical structure than either Cdc23 or HcpC (RMSD values of >2.5 Å for Cα atoms) (Fig. 5B). RESULTS
63 72 SEL1Lcent structure_element However, superimposing the structure of SLR motifs 5 to 9 from SEL1Lcent onto the overall Cdc23N-term or full-length HcpC structures revealed that SLR motifs 5 to 9 in SEL1Lcent have a different superhelical structure than either Cdc23 or HcpC (RMSD values of >2.5 Å for Cα atoms) (Fig. 5B). RESULTS
90 95 Cdc23 protein However, superimposing the structure of SLR motifs 5 to 9 from SEL1Lcent onto the overall Cdc23N-term or full-length HcpC structures revealed that SLR motifs 5 to 9 in SEL1Lcent have a different superhelical structure than either Cdc23 or HcpC (RMSD values of >2.5 Å for Cα atoms) (Fig. 5B). RESULTS
105 116 full-length protein_state However, superimposing the structure of SLR motifs 5 to 9 from SEL1Lcent onto the overall Cdc23N-term or full-length HcpC structures revealed that SLR motifs 5 to 9 in SEL1Lcent have a different superhelical structure than either Cdc23 or HcpC (RMSD values of >2.5 Å for Cα atoms) (Fig. 5B). RESULTS
117 121 HcpC protein However, superimposing the structure of SLR motifs 5 to 9 from SEL1Lcent onto the overall Cdc23N-term or full-length HcpC structures revealed that SLR motifs 5 to 9 in SEL1Lcent have a different superhelical structure than either Cdc23 or HcpC (RMSD values of >2.5 Å for Cα atoms) (Fig. 5B). RESULTS
122 132 structures evidence However, superimposing the structure of SLR motifs 5 to 9 from SEL1Lcent onto the overall Cdc23N-term or full-length HcpC structures revealed that SLR motifs 5 to 9 in SEL1Lcent have a different superhelical structure than either Cdc23 or HcpC (RMSD values of >2.5 Å for Cα atoms) (Fig. 5B). RESULTS
147 164 SLR motifs 5 to 9 structure_element However, superimposing the structure of SLR motifs 5 to 9 from SEL1Lcent onto the overall Cdc23N-term or full-length HcpC structures revealed that SLR motifs 5 to 9 in SEL1Lcent have a different superhelical structure than either Cdc23 or HcpC (RMSD values of >2.5 Å for Cα atoms) (Fig. 5B). RESULTS
168 177 SEL1Lcent structure_element However, superimposing the structure of SLR motifs 5 to 9 from SEL1Lcent onto the overall Cdc23N-term or full-length HcpC structures revealed that SLR motifs 5 to 9 in SEL1Lcent have a different superhelical structure than either Cdc23 or HcpC (RMSD values of >2.5 Å for Cα atoms) (Fig. 5B). RESULTS
230 235 Cdc23 protein However, superimposing the structure of SLR motifs 5 to 9 from SEL1Lcent onto the overall Cdc23N-term or full-length HcpC structures revealed that SLR motifs 5 to 9 in SEL1Lcent have a different superhelical structure than either Cdc23 or HcpC (RMSD values of >2.5 Å for Cα atoms) (Fig. 5B). RESULTS
239 243 HcpC protein However, superimposing the structure of SLR motifs 5 to 9 from SEL1Lcent onto the overall Cdc23N-term or full-length HcpC structures revealed that SLR motifs 5 to 9 in SEL1Lcent have a different superhelical structure than either Cdc23 or HcpC (RMSD values of >2.5 Å for Cα atoms) (Fig. 5B). RESULTS
245 249 RMSD evidence However, superimposing the structure of SLR motifs 5 to 9 from SEL1Lcent onto the overall Cdc23N-term or full-length HcpC structures revealed that SLR motifs 5 to 9 in SEL1Lcent have a different superhelical structure than either Cdc23 or HcpC (RMSD values of >2.5 Å for Cα atoms) (Fig. 5B). RESULTS
73 78 loops structure_element The differences may result from the differing numbers of residues in the loops and differences in antiparallel helix packing. RESULTS
98 116 antiparallel helix structure_element The differences may result from the differing numbers of residues in the loops and differences in antiparallel helix packing. RESULTS
20 29 conserved protein_state Moreover, there are conserved disulfide bonds in the SLR motifs of HcpC and HcpB, but no such bonds are observed in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
30 45 disulfide bonds ptm Moreover, there are conserved disulfide bonds in the SLR motifs of HcpC and HcpB, but no such bonds are observed in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
53 56 SLR structure_element Moreover, there are conserved disulfide bonds in the SLR motifs of HcpC and HcpB, but no such bonds are observed in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
67 71 HcpC protein Moreover, there are conserved disulfide bonds in the SLR motifs of HcpC and HcpB, but no such bonds are observed in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
76 80 HcpB protein Moreover, there are conserved disulfide bonds in the SLR motifs of HcpC and HcpB, but no such bonds are observed in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
116 125 SEL1Lcent structure_element Moreover, there are conserved disulfide bonds in the SLR motifs of HcpC and HcpB, but no such bonds are observed in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
79 82 SLR structure_element These factors contribute to the differences in the overall conformation of the SLR motifs in SEL1L and other SLR or TPR motif-containing proteins. RESULTS
93 98 SEL1L protein These factors contribute to the differences in the overall conformation of the SLR motifs in SEL1L and other SLR or TPR motif-containing proteins. RESULTS
109 145 SLR or TPR motif-containing proteins protein_type These factors contribute to the differences in the overall conformation of the SLR motifs in SEL1L and other SLR or TPR motif-containing proteins. RESULTS
32 41 structure evidence Another major difference in the structure of SLR motifs between SEL1L and HcpC is the oligomeric state of proteins. RESULTS
45 48 SLR structure_element Another major difference in the structure of SLR motifs between SEL1L and HcpC is the oligomeric state of proteins. RESULTS
64 69 SEL1L protein Another major difference in the structure of SLR motifs between SEL1L and HcpC is the oligomeric state of proteins. RESULTS
74 78 HcpC protein Another major difference in the structure of SLR motifs between SEL1L and HcpC is the oligomeric state of proteins. RESULTS
4 7 TPR structure_element The TPR motif is involved in the dimerization of proteins such as Cdc23, Cdc16, and Cdc27. RESULTS
33 45 dimerization oligomeric_state The TPR motif is involved in the dimerization of proteins such as Cdc23, Cdc16, and Cdc27. RESULTS
66 71 Cdc23 protein The TPR motif is involved in the dimerization of proteins such as Cdc23, Cdc16, and Cdc27. RESULTS
73 78 Cdc16 protein The TPR motif is involved in the dimerization of proteins such as Cdc23, Cdc16, and Cdc27. RESULTS
84 89 Cdc27 protein The TPR motif is involved in the dimerization of proteins such as Cdc23, Cdc16, and Cdc27. RESULTS
40 45 Cdc23 protein In particular, the N-terminal domain of Cdc23 (Cdc23N-term) has a TPR-motif organization similar to that of the SLR motif in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
47 52 Cdc23 protein In particular, the N-terminal domain of Cdc23 (Cdc23N-term) has a TPR-motif organization similar to that of the SLR motif in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
66 69 TPR structure_element In particular, the N-terminal domain of Cdc23 (Cdc23N-term) has a TPR-motif organization similar to that of the SLR motif in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
112 115 SLR structure_element In particular, the N-terminal domain of Cdc23 (Cdc23N-term) has a TPR-motif organization similar to that of the SLR motif in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
125 134 SEL1Lcent structure_element In particular, the N-terminal domain of Cdc23 (Cdc23N-term) has a TPR-motif organization similar to that of the SLR motif in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
10 13 TPR structure_element The seven TPR motifs of Cdc23N-term are assembled into a superhelical structure, generating a hollow surface and encircling its dimer counterpart in an interlocking clasp-like arrangement (Fig. 5C). RESULTS
24 29 Cdc23 protein The seven TPR motifs of Cdc23N-term are assembled into a superhelical structure, generating a hollow surface and encircling its dimer counterpart in an interlocking clasp-like arrangement (Fig. 5C). RESULTS
57 79 superhelical structure structure_element The seven TPR motifs of Cdc23N-term are assembled into a superhelical structure, generating a hollow surface and encircling its dimer counterpart in an interlocking clasp-like arrangement (Fig. 5C). RESULTS
128 133 dimer oligomeric_state The seven TPR motifs of Cdc23N-term are assembled into a superhelical structure, generating a hollow surface and encircling its dimer counterpart in an interlocking clasp-like arrangement (Fig. 5C). RESULTS
4 15 TPR motif 1 structure_element The TPR motif 1 (TPR1) of each Cdc23N-term subunit is located in the hollow surface of the counter subunit and interacts with residues lining the inner groove TPR α-helices, generating two-fold symmetry homotype interactions. RESULTS
17 21 TPR1 structure_element The TPR motif 1 (TPR1) of each Cdc23N-term subunit is located in the hollow surface of the counter subunit and interacts with residues lining the inner groove TPR α-helices, generating two-fold symmetry homotype interactions. RESULTS
31 36 Cdc23 protein The TPR motif 1 (TPR1) of each Cdc23N-term subunit is located in the hollow surface of the counter subunit and interacts with residues lining the inner groove TPR α-helices, generating two-fold symmetry homotype interactions. RESULTS
146 158 inner groove site The TPR motif 1 (TPR1) of each Cdc23N-term subunit is located in the hollow surface of the counter subunit and interacts with residues lining the inner groove TPR α-helices, generating two-fold symmetry homotype interactions. RESULTS
159 162 TPR structure_element The TPR motif 1 (TPR1) of each Cdc23N-term subunit is located in the hollow surface of the counter subunit and interacts with residues lining the inner groove TPR α-helices, generating two-fold symmetry homotype interactions. RESULTS
163 172 α-helices structure_element The TPR motif 1 (TPR1) of each Cdc23N-term subunit is located in the hollow surface of the counter subunit and interacts with residues lining the inner groove TPR α-helices, generating two-fold symmetry homotype interactions. RESULTS
17 26 structure evidence However, in this structure, a conformational change in the TPR motif itself is not observed. RESULTS
59 62 TPR structure_element However, in this structure, a conformational change in the TPR motif itself is not observed. RESULTS
20 24 HcpC protein Self-association of HcpC has not been reported, and there is no domain-swapped structure in the SLR motifs of HcpC, in contrast to that observed in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
64 78 domain-swapped protein_state Self-association of HcpC has not been reported, and there is no domain-swapped structure in the SLR motifs of HcpC, in contrast to that observed in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
96 99 SLR structure_element Self-association of HcpC has not been reported, and there is no domain-swapped structure in the SLR motifs of HcpC, in contrast to that observed in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
110 114 HcpC protein Self-association of HcpC has not been reported, and there is no domain-swapped structure in the SLR motifs of HcpC, in contrast to that observed in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
148 157 SEL1Lcent structure_element Self-association of HcpC has not been reported, and there is no domain-swapped structure in the SLR motifs of HcpC, in contrast to that observed in SEL1Lcent. RESULTS
9 14 SEL1L protein Although SEL1L contains a number of SLR motifs comparable to HcpC, the SLR motifs in SEL1L are interrupted by other sequences, making three SLR motif clusters (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
36 39 SLR structure_element Although SEL1L contains a number of SLR motifs comparable to HcpC, the SLR motifs in SEL1L are interrupted by other sequences, making three SLR motif clusters (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
61 65 HcpC protein Although SEL1L contains a number of SLR motifs comparable to HcpC, the SLR motifs in SEL1L are interrupted by other sequences, making three SLR motif clusters (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
71 74 SLR structure_element Although SEL1L contains a number of SLR motifs comparable to HcpC, the SLR motifs in SEL1L are interrupted by other sequences, making three SLR motif clusters (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
85 90 SEL1L protein Although SEL1L contains a number of SLR motifs comparable to HcpC, the SLR motifs in SEL1L are interrupted by other sequences, making three SLR motif clusters (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
140 143 SLR structure_element Although SEL1L contains a number of SLR motifs comparable to HcpC, the SLR motifs in SEL1L are interrupted by other sequences, making three SLR motif clusters (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
16 19 SLR structure_element The interrupted SLR motifs may be required for dimerization of SEL1Lcent, as five SLR motifs are more than enough to form the semicircle of the yin-yang symbol (Fig. 1B). RESULTS
47 59 dimerization oligomeric_state The interrupted SLR motifs may be required for dimerization of SEL1Lcent, as five SLR motifs are more than enough to form the semicircle of the yin-yang symbol (Fig. 1B). RESULTS
63 72 SEL1Lcent structure_element The interrupted SLR motifs may be required for dimerization of SEL1Lcent, as five SLR motifs are more than enough to form the semicircle of the yin-yang symbol (Fig. 1B). RESULTS
82 85 SLR structure_element The interrupted SLR motifs may be required for dimerization of SEL1Lcent, as five SLR motifs are more than enough to form the semicircle of the yin-yang symbol (Fig. 1B). RESULTS
126 152 semicircle of the yin-yang structure_element The interrupted SLR motifs may be required for dimerization of SEL1Lcent, as five SLR motifs are more than enough to form the semicircle of the yin-yang symbol (Fig. 1B). RESULTS
0 8 Helix 5A structure_element Helix 5A from SLR motif 5 meets helix 9A from SLR motif 9 of the counterpart SEL1L. RESULTS
14 25 SLR motif 5 structure_element Helix 5A from SLR motif 5 meets helix 9A from SLR motif 9 of the counterpart SEL1L. RESULTS
32 40 helix 9A structure_element Helix 5A from SLR motif 5 meets helix 9A from SLR motif 9 of the counterpart SEL1L. RESULTS
46 57 SLR motif 9 structure_element Helix 5A from SLR motif 5 meets helix 9A from SLR motif 9 of the counterpart SEL1L. RESULTS
77 82 SEL1L protein Helix 5A from SLR motif 5 meets helix 9A from SLR motif 9 of the counterpart SEL1L. RESULTS
7 24 SLR motifs 5 to 9 structure_element If the SLR motifs 5 to 9 were not isolated from other SLR motifs, steric hindrance could interfere with dimerization of SEL1L. RESULTS
54 57 SLR structure_element If the SLR motifs 5 to 9 were not isolated from other SLR motifs, steric hindrance could interfere with dimerization of SEL1L. RESULTS
104 116 dimerization oligomeric_state If the SLR motifs 5 to 9 were not isolated from other SLR motifs, steric hindrance could interfere with dimerization of SEL1L. RESULTS
120 125 SEL1L protein If the SLR motifs 5 to 9 were not isolated from other SLR motifs, steric hindrance could interfere with dimerization of SEL1L. RESULTS
44 48 TPRs structure_element This is one of the biggest differences from TPRs in Cdc23 and from the SLRs in HcpC, where the motifs exist in tandem. RESULTS
52 57 Cdc23 protein This is one of the biggest differences from TPRs in Cdc23 and from the SLRs in HcpC, where the motifs exist in tandem. RESULTS
71 75 SLRs structure_element This is one of the biggest differences from TPRs in Cdc23 and from the SLRs in HcpC, where the motifs exist in tandem. RESULTS
79 83 HcpC protein This is one of the biggest differences from TPRs in Cdc23 and from the SLRs in HcpC, where the motifs exist in tandem. RESULTS
0 3 TPR structure_element TPR and SLR motifs are generally involved in protein-protein interaction modules, and the sequences between the SLR motifs of SEL1L might actually facilitate the self-association of this protein. RESULTS
8 11 SLR structure_element TPR and SLR motifs are generally involved in protein-protein interaction modules, and the sequences between the SLR motifs of SEL1L might actually facilitate the self-association of this protein. RESULTS
112 115 SLR structure_element TPR and SLR motifs are generally involved in protein-protein interaction modules, and the sequences between the SLR motifs of SEL1L might actually facilitate the self-association of this protein. RESULTS
126 131 SEL1L protein TPR and SLR motifs are generally involved in protein-protein interaction modules, and the sequences between the SLR motifs of SEL1L might actually facilitate the self-association of this protein. RESULTS
0 5 SLR-C structure_element SLR-C of SEL1L Binds HRD1 N-terminus Luminal Loop RESULTS
9 14 SEL1L protein SLR-C of SEL1L Binds HRD1 N-terminus Luminal Loop RESULTS
21 25 HRD1 protein SLR-C of SEL1L Binds HRD1 N-terminus Luminal Loop RESULTS
37 49 Luminal Loop structure_element SLR-C of SEL1L Binds HRD1 N-terminus Luminal Loop RESULTS
13 28 structural data evidence Based on the structural data presented herein, a possible arrangement of membrane-associated ERAD components in mammals, highlighting the molecular functions of SLR domains in SEL1L, is shown in Fig. 6C. RESULTS
112 119 mammals taxonomy_domain Based on the structural data presented herein, a possible arrangement of membrane-associated ERAD components in mammals, highlighting the molecular functions of SLR domains in SEL1L, is shown in Fig. 6C. RESULTS
161 164 SLR structure_element Based on the structural data presented herein, a possible arrangement of membrane-associated ERAD components in mammals, highlighting the molecular functions of SLR domains in SEL1L, is shown in Fig. 6C. RESULTS
176 181 SEL1L protein Based on the structural data presented herein, a possible arrangement of membrane-associated ERAD components in mammals, highlighting the molecular functions of SLR domains in SEL1L, is shown in Fig. 6C. RESULTS
27 30 SLR structure_element We suggest that the middle SLR domains are involved in the dimerization of SEL1L based on the crystal structure and biochemical data. RESULTS
59 71 dimerization oligomeric_state We suggest that the middle SLR domains are involved in the dimerization of SEL1L based on the crystal structure and biochemical data. RESULTS
75 80 SEL1L protein We suggest that the middle SLR domains are involved in the dimerization of SEL1L based on the crystal structure and biochemical data. RESULTS
94 111 crystal structure evidence We suggest that the middle SLR domains are involved in the dimerization of SEL1L based on the crystal structure and biochemical data. RESULTS
0 5 SLR-C structure_element SLR-C, which contains SLR motifs 10 to 11, might be involved in the interaction with HRD1. RESULTS
22 41 SLR motifs 10 to 11 structure_element SLR-C, which contains SLR motifs 10 to 11, might be involved in the interaction with HRD1. RESULTS
85 89 HRD1 protein SLR-C, which contains SLR motifs 10 to 11, might be involved in the interaction with HRD1. RESULTS
34 39 yeast taxonomy_domain Indirect evidence from a previous yeast study shows that the circumscribed region of C-terminal Hrd3p, specifically residues 664695, forms contacts with the Hrd1 luminal loops. RESULTS
96 101 Hrd3p protein Indirect evidence from a previous yeast study shows that the circumscribed region of C-terminal Hrd3p, specifically residues 664695, forms contacts with the Hrd1 luminal loops. RESULTS
125 132 664695 residue_range Indirect evidence from a previous yeast study shows that the circumscribed region of C-terminal Hrd3p, specifically residues 664695, forms contacts with the Hrd1 luminal loops. RESULTS
158 162 Hrd1 protein Indirect evidence from a previous yeast study shows that the circumscribed region of C-terminal Hrd3p, specifically residues 664695, forms contacts with the Hrd1 luminal loops. RESULTS
163 176 luminal loops structure_element Indirect evidence from a previous yeast study shows that the circumscribed region of C-terminal Hrd3p, specifically residues 664695, forms contacts with the Hrd1 luminal loops. RESULTS
4 9 Hrd3p protein The Hrd3p residues 664695 correspond to mouse SEL1L residues 696727, which include the entire helix 11B (residue 697709) of SLR motif 11 and a well-conserved adjacent region (Supplementary Fig. 4). RESULTS
19 26 664695 residue_range The Hrd3p residues 664695 correspond to mouse SEL1L residues 696727, which include the entire helix 11B (residue 697709) of SLR motif 11 and a well-conserved adjacent region (Supplementary Fig. 4). RESULTS
41 46 mouse taxonomy_domain The Hrd3p residues 664695 correspond to mouse SEL1L residues 696727, which include the entire helix 11B (residue 697709) of SLR motif 11 and a well-conserved adjacent region (Supplementary Fig. 4). RESULTS
47 52 SEL1L protein The Hrd3p residues 664695 correspond to mouse SEL1L residues 696727, which include the entire helix 11B (residue 697709) of SLR motif 11 and a well-conserved adjacent region (Supplementary Fig. 4). RESULTS
62 69 696727 residue_range The Hrd3p residues 664695 correspond to mouse SEL1L residues 696727, which include the entire helix 11B (residue 697709) of SLR motif 11 and a well-conserved adjacent region (Supplementary Fig. 4). RESULTS
96 105 helix 11B structure_element The Hrd3p residues 664695 correspond to mouse SEL1L residues 696727, which include the entire helix 11B (residue 697709) of SLR motif 11 and a well-conserved adjacent region (Supplementary Fig. 4). RESULTS
115 122 697709 residue_range The Hrd3p residues 664695 correspond to mouse SEL1L residues 696727, which include the entire helix 11B (residue 697709) of SLR motif 11 and a well-conserved adjacent region (Supplementary Fig. 4). RESULTS
127 139 SLR motif 11 structure_element The Hrd3p residues 664695 correspond to mouse SEL1L residues 696727, which include the entire helix 11B (residue 697709) of SLR motif 11 and a well-conserved adjacent region (Supplementary Fig. 4). RESULTS
146 160 well-conserved protein_state The Hrd3p residues 664695 correspond to mouse SEL1L residues 696727, which include the entire helix 11B (residue 697709) of SLR motif 11 and a well-conserved adjacent region (Supplementary Fig. 4). RESULTS
76 94 SLR motif 10 to 11 structure_element This observation is supported by the following: (1) the meticulous range of SLR motif 10 to 11 is newly established from a structure-guided SLR motif alignment, based on the present structure study, and (2) the relatively high sequence conservation between mammalian SEL1L and yeast Hrd3p around SLR motifs 10 to 11, which contain contact regions with HRD1 (Hrd1p) (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). RESULTS
123 159 structure-guided SLR motif alignment experimental_method This observation is supported by the following: (1) the meticulous range of SLR motif 10 to 11 is newly established from a structure-guided SLR motif alignment, based on the present structure study, and (2) the relatively high sequence conservation between mammalian SEL1L and yeast Hrd3p around SLR motifs 10 to 11, which contain contact regions with HRD1 (Hrd1p) (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). RESULTS
182 197 structure study experimental_method This observation is supported by the following: (1) the meticulous range of SLR motif 10 to 11 is newly established from a structure-guided SLR motif alignment, based on the present structure study, and (2) the relatively high sequence conservation between mammalian SEL1L and yeast Hrd3p around SLR motifs 10 to 11, which contain contact regions with HRD1 (Hrd1p) (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). RESULTS
227 248 sequence conservation protein_state This observation is supported by the following: (1) the meticulous range of SLR motif 10 to 11 is newly established from a structure-guided SLR motif alignment, based on the present structure study, and (2) the relatively high sequence conservation between mammalian SEL1L and yeast Hrd3p around SLR motifs 10 to 11, which contain contact regions with HRD1 (Hrd1p) (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). RESULTS
257 266 mammalian taxonomy_domain This observation is supported by the following: (1) the meticulous range of SLR motif 10 to 11 is newly established from a structure-guided SLR motif alignment, based on the present structure study, and (2) the relatively high sequence conservation between mammalian SEL1L and yeast Hrd3p around SLR motifs 10 to 11, which contain contact regions with HRD1 (Hrd1p) (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). RESULTS
267 272 SEL1L protein This observation is supported by the following: (1) the meticulous range of SLR motif 10 to 11 is newly established from a structure-guided SLR motif alignment, based on the present structure study, and (2) the relatively high sequence conservation between mammalian SEL1L and yeast Hrd3p around SLR motifs 10 to 11, which contain contact regions with HRD1 (Hrd1p) (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). RESULTS
277 282 yeast taxonomy_domain This observation is supported by the following: (1) the meticulous range of SLR motif 10 to 11 is newly established from a structure-guided SLR motif alignment, based on the present structure study, and (2) the relatively high sequence conservation between mammalian SEL1L and yeast Hrd3p around SLR motifs 10 to 11, which contain contact regions with HRD1 (Hrd1p) (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). RESULTS
283 288 Hrd3p protein This observation is supported by the following: (1) the meticulous range of SLR motif 10 to 11 is newly established from a structure-guided SLR motif alignment, based on the present structure study, and (2) the relatively high sequence conservation between mammalian SEL1L and yeast Hrd3p around SLR motifs 10 to 11, which contain contact regions with HRD1 (Hrd1p) (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). RESULTS
296 315 SLR motifs 10 to 11 structure_element This observation is supported by the following: (1) the meticulous range of SLR motif 10 to 11 is newly established from a structure-guided SLR motif alignment, based on the present structure study, and (2) the relatively high sequence conservation between mammalian SEL1L and yeast Hrd3p around SLR motifs 10 to 11, which contain contact regions with HRD1 (Hrd1p) (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). RESULTS
352 356 HRD1 protein This observation is supported by the following: (1) the meticulous range of SLR motif 10 to 11 is newly established from a structure-guided SLR motif alignment, based on the present structure study, and (2) the relatively high sequence conservation between mammalian SEL1L and yeast Hrd3p around SLR motifs 10 to 11, which contain contact regions with HRD1 (Hrd1p) (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). RESULTS
358 363 Hrd1p protein This observation is supported by the following: (1) the meticulous range of SLR motif 10 to 11 is newly established from a structure-guided SLR motif alignment, based on the present structure study, and (2) the relatively high sequence conservation between mammalian SEL1L and yeast Hrd3p around SLR motifs 10 to 11, which contain contact regions with HRD1 (Hrd1p) (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). RESULTS
60 65 mouse taxonomy_domain To address this hypothesis, we prepared constructs encoding mouse HRD1 luminal fragments fused to GST as shown in Fig. 6A, and tested their ability to bind certain SLR motifs in SEL1L. RESULTS
66 70 HRD1 protein To address this hypothesis, we prepared constructs encoding mouse HRD1 luminal fragments fused to GST as shown in Fig. 6A, and tested their ability to bind certain SLR motifs in SEL1L. RESULTS
89 101 fused to GST experimental_method To address this hypothesis, we prepared constructs encoding mouse HRD1 luminal fragments fused to GST as shown in Fig. 6A, and tested their ability to bind certain SLR motifs in SEL1L. RESULTS
164 167 SLR structure_element To address this hypothesis, we prepared constructs encoding mouse HRD1 luminal fragments fused to GST as shown in Fig. 6A, and tested their ability to bind certain SLR motifs in SEL1L. RESULTS
178 183 SEL1L protein To address this hypothesis, we prepared constructs encoding mouse HRD1 luminal fragments fused to GST as shown in Fig. 6A, and tested their ability to bind certain SLR motifs in SEL1L. RESULTS
94 99 SLR-N structure_element The fusion proteins were immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose beads and probed for binding to SLR-N, SLR-M, SLR-C, and monomer form of SLR-M (SLR-ML521A). RESULTS
101 106 SLR-M structure_element The fusion proteins were immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose beads and probed for binding to SLR-N, SLR-M, SLR-C, and monomer form of SLR-M (SLR-ML521A). RESULTS
108 113 SLR-C structure_element The fusion proteins were immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose beads and probed for binding to SLR-N, SLR-M, SLR-C, and monomer form of SLR-M (SLR-ML521A). RESULTS
119 126 monomer oligomeric_state The fusion proteins were immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose beads and probed for binding to SLR-N, SLR-M, SLR-C, and monomer form of SLR-M (SLR-ML521A). RESULTS
135 140 SLR-M structure_element The fusion proteins were immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose beads and probed for binding to SLR-N, SLR-M, SLR-C, and monomer form of SLR-M (SLR-ML521A). RESULTS
142 152 SLR-ML521A mutant The fusion proteins were immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose beads and probed for binding to SLR-N, SLR-M, SLR-C, and monomer form of SLR-M (SLR-ML521A). RESULTS
25 30 SLR-C structure_element Figure 6B shows that the SLR-C, consisting of SLR motifs 10 and 11, exclusively interacts with N-terminal luminal loop (residues 2142) of HRD1. RESULTS
46 66 SLR motifs 10 and 11 structure_element Figure 6B shows that the SLR-C, consisting of SLR motifs 10 and 11, exclusively interacts with N-terminal luminal loop (residues 2142) of HRD1. RESULTS
106 118 luminal loop structure_element Figure 6B shows that the SLR-C, consisting of SLR motifs 10 and 11, exclusively interacts with N-terminal luminal loop (residues 2142) of HRD1. RESULTS
129 134 2142 residue_range Figure 6B shows that the SLR-C, consisting of SLR motifs 10 and 11, exclusively interacts with N-terminal luminal loop (residues 2142) of HRD1. RESULTS
139 143 HRD1 protein Figure 6B shows that the SLR-C, consisting of SLR motifs 10 and 11, exclusively interacts with N-terminal luminal loop (residues 2142) of HRD1. RESULTS
27 32 SLR-N structure_element The molecular functions of SLR-N are unclear. RESULTS
24 29 SLR-N structure_element One possibility is that SLR-N contributes to substrate recognition of proteins to be degraded because there are a couple of putative glycosylation sites within the SLR-N domain (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
133 152 glycosylation sites site One possibility is that SLR-N contributes to substrate recognition of proteins to be degraded because there are a couple of putative glycosylation sites within the SLR-N domain (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
164 169 SLR-N structure_element One possibility is that SLR-N contributes to substrate recognition of proteins to be degraded because there are a couple of putative glycosylation sites within the SLR-N domain (Fig. 1A). RESULTS
0 9 SEL1Lcent structure_element SEL1Lcent contains a putative N-glycosylation site, Asn 427, which is highly conserved among different species and structurally exposed to the surface of the SEL1L dimer according to the crystal structure (Fig. 6C). RESULTS
30 50 N-glycosylation site site SEL1Lcent contains a putative N-glycosylation site, Asn 427, which is highly conserved among different species and structurally exposed to the surface of the SEL1L dimer according to the crystal structure (Fig. 6C). RESULTS
52 59 Asn 427 residue_name_number SEL1Lcent contains a putative N-glycosylation site, Asn 427, which is highly conserved among different species and structurally exposed to the surface of the SEL1L dimer according to the crystal structure (Fig. 6C). RESULTS
70 86 highly conserved protein_state SEL1Lcent contains a putative N-glycosylation site, Asn 427, which is highly conserved among different species and structurally exposed to the surface of the SEL1L dimer according to the crystal structure (Fig. 6C). RESULTS
158 163 SEL1L protein SEL1Lcent contains a putative N-glycosylation site, Asn 427, which is highly conserved among different species and structurally exposed to the surface of the SEL1L dimer according to the crystal structure (Fig. 6C). RESULTS
164 169 dimer oligomeric_state SEL1Lcent contains a putative N-glycosylation site, Asn 427, which is highly conserved among different species and structurally exposed to the surface of the SEL1L dimer according to the crystal structure (Fig. 6C). RESULTS
187 204 crystal structure evidence SEL1Lcent contains a putative N-glycosylation site, Asn 427, which is highly conserved among different species and structurally exposed to the surface of the SEL1L dimer according to the crystal structure (Fig. 6C). RESULTS
72 77 yeast taxonomy_domain Many reports demonstrate that membrane-bound ERAD machinery proteins in yeast, such as Hrd1p, Der1p, and Usa1p, are involved in oligomerization of ERAD components. DISCUSS
87 92 Hrd1p protein Many reports demonstrate that membrane-bound ERAD machinery proteins in yeast, such as Hrd1p, Der1p, and Usa1p, are involved in oligomerization of ERAD components. DISCUSS
94 99 Der1p protein Many reports demonstrate that membrane-bound ERAD machinery proteins in yeast, such as Hrd1p, Der1p, and Usa1p, are involved in oligomerization of ERAD components. DISCUSS
105 110 Usa1p protein Many reports demonstrate that membrane-bound ERAD machinery proteins in yeast, such as Hrd1p, Der1p, and Usa1p, are involved in oligomerization of ERAD components. DISCUSS
4 9 Hrd1p protein The Hrd1p complex forms dimers upon sucrose gradient sedimentation and size-exclusion chromatography. DISCUSS
24 30 dimers oligomeric_state The Hrd1p complex forms dimers upon sucrose gradient sedimentation and size-exclusion chromatography. DISCUSS
36 66 sucrose gradient sedimentation experimental_method The Hrd1p complex forms dimers upon sucrose gradient sedimentation and size-exclusion chromatography. DISCUSS
71 100 size-exclusion chromatography experimental_method The Hrd1p complex forms dimers upon sucrose gradient sedimentation and size-exclusion chromatography. DISCUSS
24 41 HA-epitope-tagged protein_state Previous data show that HA-epitope-tagged Hrd3p or Hrd1p efficiently co-precipitate with unmodified Hrd3p and Hrd1p, respectively, suggesting that both Hrd1p and Hrd3p homodimers are involved in self-association of the Hrd complex. DISCUSS
42 47 Hrd3p protein Previous data show that HA-epitope-tagged Hrd3p or Hrd1p efficiently co-precipitate with unmodified Hrd3p and Hrd1p, respectively, suggesting that both Hrd1p and Hrd3p homodimers are involved in self-association of the Hrd complex. DISCUSS
51 56 Hrd1p protein Previous data show that HA-epitope-tagged Hrd3p or Hrd1p efficiently co-precipitate with unmodified Hrd3p and Hrd1p, respectively, suggesting that both Hrd1p and Hrd3p homodimers are involved in self-association of the Hrd complex. DISCUSS
89 99 unmodified protein_state Previous data show that HA-epitope-tagged Hrd3p or Hrd1p efficiently co-precipitate with unmodified Hrd3p and Hrd1p, respectively, suggesting that both Hrd1p and Hrd3p homodimers are involved in self-association of the Hrd complex. DISCUSS
100 105 Hrd3p protein Previous data show that HA-epitope-tagged Hrd3p or Hrd1p efficiently co-precipitate with unmodified Hrd3p and Hrd1p, respectively, suggesting that both Hrd1p and Hrd3p homodimers are involved in self-association of the Hrd complex. DISCUSS
110 115 Hrd1p protein Previous data show that HA-epitope-tagged Hrd3p or Hrd1p efficiently co-precipitate with unmodified Hrd3p and Hrd1p, respectively, suggesting that both Hrd1p and Hrd3p homodimers are involved in self-association of the Hrd complex. DISCUSS
152 157 Hrd1p protein Previous data show that HA-epitope-tagged Hrd3p or Hrd1p efficiently co-precipitate with unmodified Hrd3p and Hrd1p, respectively, suggesting that both Hrd1p and Hrd3p homodimers are involved in self-association of the Hrd complex. DISCUSS
162 167 Hrd3p protein Previous data show that HA-epitope-tagged Hrd3p or Hrd1p efficiently co-precipitate with unmodified Hrd3p and Hrd1p, respectively, suggesting that both Hrd1p and Hrd3p homodimers are involved in self-association of the Hrd complex. DISCUSS
168 178 homodimers oligomeric_state Previous data show that HA-epitope-tagged Hrd3p or Hrd1p efficiently co-precipitate with unmodified Hrd3p and Hrd1p, respectively, suggesting that both Hrd1p and Hrd3p homodimers are involved in self-association of the Hrd complex. DISCUSS
219 222 Hrd complex_assembly Previous data show that HA-epitope-tagged Hrd3p or Hrd1p efficiently co-precipitate with unmodified Hrd3p and Hrd1p, respectively, suggesting that both Hrd1p and Hrd3p homodimers are involved in self-association of the Hrd complex. DISCUSS
100 105 yeast taxonomy_domain Considering that the functional and structural composition of ERAD components are conserved in both yeast and mammals, we propose that the mammalian ERAD components also form self-associating oligomers. DISCUSS
110 117 mammals taxonomy_domain Considering that the functional and structural composition of ERAD components are conserved in both yeast and mammals, we propose that the mammalian ERAD components also form self-associating oligomers. DISCUSS
139 148 mammalian taxonomy_domain Considering that the functional and structural composition of ERAD components are conserved in both yeast and mammals, we propose that the mammalian ERAD components also form self-associating oligomers. DISCUSS
192 201 oligomers oligomeric_state Considering that the functional and structural composition of ERAD components are conserved in both yeast and mammals, we propose that the mammalian ERAD components also form self-associating oligomers. DISCUSS
32 50 cross-linking data experimental_method This hypothesis is supported by cross-linking data suggesting that human HRD1 forms a homodimer. DISCUSS
67 72 human species This hypothesis is supported by cross-linking data suggesting that human HRD1 forms a homodimer. DISCUSS
73 77 HRD1 protein This hypothesis is supported by cross-linking data suggesting that human HRD1 forms a homodimer. DISCUSS
86 95 homodimer oligomeric_state This hypothesis is supported by cross-linking data suggesting that human HRD1 forms a homodimer. DISCUSS
39 56 crystal structure evidence Consistent with the previous data, our crystal structure and biochemical data demonstrate that mouse SEL1Lcent exists as a homodimer in the ER lumen via domain swapping of SLR motif 9. DISCUSS
61 77 biochemical data evidence Consistent with the previous data, our crystal structure and biochemical data demonstrate that mouse SEL1Lcent exists as a homodimer in the ER lumen via domain swapping of SLR motif 9. DISCUSS
95 100 mouse taxonomy_domain Consistent with the previous data, our crystal structure and biochemical data demonstrate that mouse SEL1Lcent exists as a homodimer in the ER lumen via domain swapping of SLR motif 9. DISCUSS
101 110 SEL1Lcent structure_element Consistent with the previous data, our crystal structure and biochemical data demonstrate that mouse SEL1Lcent exists as a homodimer in the ER lumen via domain swapping of SLR motif 9. DISCUSS
123 132 homodimer oligomeric_state Consistent with the previous data, our crystal structure and biochemical data demonstrate that mouse SEL1Lcent exists as a homodimer in the ER lumen via domain swapping of SLR motif 9. DISCUSS
172 183 SLR motif 9 structure_element Consistent with the previous data, our crystal structure and biochemical data demonstrate that mouse SEL1Lcent exists as a homodimer in the ER lumen via domain swapping of SLR motif 9. DISCUSS
63 68 dimer oligomeric_state We need to further test whether there are contacts involved in dimer formation in SEL1L in addition to those in the SLR-M region. DISCUSS
82 87 SEL1L protein We need to further test whether there are contacts involved in dimer formation in SEL1L in addition to those in the SLR-M region. DISCUSS
116 121 SLR-M structure_element We need to further test whether there are contacts involved in dimer formation in SEL1L in addition to those in the SLR-M region. DISCUSS
3 8 yeast taxonomy_domain In yeast, Usa1p acts as a scaffold for Hrd1p and Der1p, in which the N-terminus of Usa1p interacts with the C-terminal 34 amino acids of Hrd1p in the cytosol to induce oligomerization of Hrd1p, which is essential for its activity. DISCUSS
10 15 Usa1p protein In yeast, Usa1p acts as a scaffold for Hrd1p and Der1p, in which the N-terminus of Usa1p interacts with the C-terminal 34 amino acids of Hrd1p in the cytosol to induce oligomerization of Hrd1p, which is essential for its activity. DISCUSS
39 44 Hrd1p protein In yeast, Usa1p acts as a scaffold for Hrd1p and Der1p, in which the N-terminus of Usa1p interacts with the C-terminal 34 amino acids of Hrd1p in the cytosol to induce oligomerization of Hrd1p, which is essential for its activity. DISCUSS
49 54 Der1p protein In yeast, Usa1p acts as a scaffold for Hrd1p and Der1p, in which the N-terminus of Usa1p interacts with the C-terminal 34 amino acids of Hrd1p in the cytosol to induce oligomerization of Hrd1p, which is essential for its activity. DISCUSS
83 88 Usa1p protein In yeast, Usa1p acts as a scaffold for Hrd1p and Der1p, in which the N-terminus of Usa1p interacts with the C-terminal 34 amino acids of Hrd1p in the cytosol to induce oligomerization of Hrd1p, which is essential for its activity. DISCUSS
137 142 Hrd1p protein In yeast, Usa1p acts as a scaffold for Hrd1p and Der1p, in which the N-terminus of Usa1p interacts with the C-terminal 34 amino acids of Hrd1p in the cytosol to induce oligomerization of Hrd1p, which is essential for its activity. DISCUSS
187 192 Hrd1p protein In yeast, Usa1p acts as a scaffold for Hrd1p and Der1p, in which the N-terminus of Usa1p interacts with the C-terminal 34 amino acids of Hrd1p in the cytosol to induce oligomerization of Hrd1p, which is essential for its activity. DISCUSS
9 18 metazoans taxonomy_domain However, metazoans lack a clear Usa1p homolog. DISCUSS
32 37 Usa1p protein However, metazoans lack a clear Usa1p homolog. DISCUSS
9 18 mammalian taxonomy_domain Although mammalian HERP has sequences and domains that are conserved in Usa1p, the molecular function of HERP is not clearly related to that of Usa1p. DISCUSS
19 23 HERP protein_type Although mammalian HERP has sequences and domains that are conserved in Usa1p, the molecular function of HERP is not clearly related to that of Usa1p. DISCUSS
59 71 conserved in protein_state Although mammalian HERP has sequences and domains that are conserved in Usa1p, the molecular function of HERP is not clearly related to that of Usa1p. DISCUSS
72 77 Usa1p protein Although mammalian HERP has sequences and domains that are conserved in Usa1p, the molecular function of HERP is not clearly related to that of Usa1p. DISCUSS
105 109 HERP protein_type Although mammalian HERP has sequences and domains that are conserved in Usa1p, the molecular function of HERP is not clearly related to that of Usa1p. DISCUSS
144 149 Usa1p protein Although mammalian HERP has sequences and domains that are conserved in Usa1p, the molecular function of HERP is not clearly related to that of Usa1p. DISCUSS
37 58 transiently expressed protein_state Rather, recent research shows that a transiently expressed HRD1-SEL1L complex alone associates with the ERAD lectins OS9 or XTP-B and is sufficient to facilitate the retrotranslocation and degradation of the model ERAD substrate α-antitrypsin null Hong-Kong (NHK) and its variant, NHK-QQQ, which lacks the N-glycosylation sites. DISCUSS
59 69 HRD1-SEL1L complex_assembly Rather, recent research shows that a transiently expressed HRD1-SEL1L complex alone associates with the ERAD lectins OS9 or XTP-B and is sufficient to facilitate the retrotranslocation and degradation of the model ERAD substrate α-antitrypsin null Hong-Kong (NHK) and its variant, NHK-QQQ, which lacks the N-glycosylation sites. DISCUSS
109 116 lectins protein_type Rather, recent research shows that a transiently expressed HRD1-SEL1L complex alone associates with the ERAD lectins OS9 or XTP-B and is sufficient to facilitate the retrotranslocation and degradation of the model ERAD substrate α-antitrypsin null Hong-Kong (NHK) and its variant, NHK-QQQ, which lacks the N-glycosylation sites. DISCUSS
117 120 OS9 protein Rather, recent research shows that a transiently expressed HRD1-SEL1L complex alone associates with the ERAD lectins OS9 or XTP-B and is sufficient to facilitate the retrotranslocation and degradation of the model ERAD substrate α-antitrypsin null Hong-Kong (NHK) and its variant, NHK-QQQ, which lacks the N-glycosylation sites. DISCUSS
124 129 XTP-B protein Rather, recent research shows that a transiently expressed HRD1-SEL1L complex alone associates with the ERAD lectins OS9 or XTP-B and is sufficient to facilitate the retrotranslocation and degradation of the model ERAD substrate α-antitrypsin null Hong-Kong (NHK) and its variant, NHK-QQQ, which lacks the N-glycosylation sites. DISCUSS
229 257 α-antitrypsin null Hong-Kong protein Rather, recent research shows that a transiently expressed HRD1-SEL1L complex alone associates with the ERAD lectins OS9 or XTP-B and is sufficient to facilitate the retrotranslocation and degradation of the model ERAD substrate α-antitrypsin null Hong-Kong (NHK) and its variant, NHK-QQQ, which lacks the N-glycosylation sites. DISCUSS
259 262 NHK protein Rather, recent research shows that a transiently expressed HRD1-SEL1L complex alone associates with the ERAD lectins OS9 or XTP-B and is sufficient to facilitate the retrotranslocation and degradation of the model ERAD substrate α-antitrypsin null Hong-Kong (NHK) and its variant, NHK-QQQ, which lacks the N-glycosylation sites. DISCUSS
281 288 NHK-QQQ mutant Rather, recent research shows that a transiently expressed HRD1-SEL1L complex alone associates with the ERAD lectins OS9 or XTP-B and is sufficient to facilitate the retrotranslocation and degradation of the model ERAD substrate α-antitrypsin null Hong-Kong (NHK) and its variant, NHK-QQQ, which lacks the N-glycosylation sites. DISCUSS
296 301 lacks protein_state Rather, recent research shows that a transiently expressed HRD1-SEL1L complex alone associates with the ERAD lectins OS9 or XTP-B and is sufficient to facilitate the retrotranslocation and degradation of the model ERAD substrate α-antitrypsin null Hong-Kong (NHK) and its variant, NHK-QQQ, which lacks the N-glycosylation sites. DISCUSS
306 327 N-glycosylation sites site Rather, recent research shows that a transiently expressed HRD1-SEL1L complex alone associates with the ERAD lectins OS9 or XTP-B and is sufficient to facilitate the retrotranslocation and degradation of the model ERAD substrate α-antitrypsin null Hong-Kong (NHK) and its variant, NHK-QQQ, which lacks the N-glycosylation sites. DISCUSS
117 126 homodimer oligomeric_state Assuming that the correct oligomerization of ERAD components may be critical for their function, we hypothesize that homodimer formation of SEL1L in the ER lumen may stabilize oligomerization of the HRD complex, given that SEL1L forms a stoichiometric complex with HRD1. DISCUSS
140 145 SEL1L protein Assuming that the correct oligomerization of ERAD components may be critical for their function, we hypothesize that homodimer formation of SEL1L in the ER lumen may stabilize oligomerization of the HRD complex, given that SEL1L forms a stoichiometric complex with HRD1. DISCUSS
199 202 HRD complex_assembly Assuming that the correct oligomerization of ERAD components may be critical for their function, we hypothesize that homodimer formation of SEL1L in the ER lumen may stabilize oligomerization of the HRD complex, given that SEL1L forms a stoichiometric complex with HRD1. DISCUSS
223 228 SEL1L protein Assuming that the correct oligomerization of ERAD components may be critical for their function, we hypothesize that homodimer formation of SEL1L in the ER lumen may stabilize oligomerization of the HRD complex, given that SEL1L forms a stoichiometric complex with HRD1. DISCUSS
252 264 complex with protein_state Assuming that the correct oligomerization of ERAD components may be critical for their function, we hypothesize that homodimer formation of SEL1L in the ER lumen may stabilize oligomerization of the HRD complex, given that SEL1L forms a stoichiometric complex with HRD1. DISCUSS
265 269 HRD1 protein Assuming that the correct oligomerization of ERAD components may be critical for their function, we hypothesize that homodimer formation of SEL1L in the ER lumen may stabilize oligomerization of the HRD complex, given that SEL1L forms a stoichiometric complex with HRD1. DISCUSS
55 60 SLR-C structure_element This is further supported by our data showing that the SLR-C of SEL1L directly interacts with the luminal fragment of HRD1 in the ER lumen. DISCUSS
64 69 SEL1L protein This is further supported by our data showing that the SLR-C of SEL1L directly interacts with the luminal fragment of HRD1 in the ER lumen. DISCUSS
118 122 HRD1 protein This is further supported by our data showing that the SLR-C of SEL1L directly interacts with the luminal fragment of HRD1 in the ER lumen. DISCUSS
44 47 HRD complex_assembly Although the organization of membrane-bound HRD complex components may be very similar between metazoans and yeast, the molecular details of interactions between the components may not necessarily be conserved. DISCUSS
95 104 metazoans taxonomy_domain Although the organization of membrane-bound HRD complex components may be very similar between metazoans and yeast, the molecular details of interactions between the components may not necessarily be conserved. DISCUSS
109 114 yeast taxonomy_domain Although the organization of membrane-bound HRD complex components may be very similar between metazoans and yeast, the molecular details of interactions between the components may not necessarily be conserved. DISCUSS
3 8 yeast taxonomy_domain In yeast, it is unclear whether self-association of Hrd3p is due to SLR motifs because the sequence of Hrd3p does not align precisely with the SLR motifs in SEL1L. DISCUSS
52 57 Hrd3p protein In yeast, it is unclear whether self-association of Hrd3p is due to SLR motifs because the sequence of Hrd3p does not align precisely with the SLR motifs in SEL1L. DISCUSS
68 71 SLR structure_element In yeast, it is unclear whether self-association of Hrd3p is due to SLR motifs because the sequence of Hrd3p does not align precisely with the SLR motifs in SEL1L. DISCUSS
103 108 Hrd3p protein In yeast, it is unclear whether self-association of Hrd3p is due to SLR motifs because the sequence of Hrd3p does not align precisely with the SLR motifs in SEL1L. DISCUSS
143 146 SLR structure_element In yeast, it is unclear whether self-association of Hrd3p is due to SLR motifs because the sequence of Hrd3p does not align precisely with the SLR motifs in SEL1L. DISCUSS
157 162 SEL1L protein In yeast, it is unclear whether self-association of Hrd3p is due to SLR motifs because the sequence of Hrd3p does not align precisely with the SLR motifs in SEL1L. DISCUSS
58 63 Hrd3p protein Furthermore, we are uncertain whether self-association of Hrd3p contributes to formation of the active form of the Hrd1p complex. DISCUSS
96 102 active protein_state Furthermore, we are uncertain whether self-association of Hrd3p contributes to formation of the active form of the Hrd1p complex. DISCUSS
115 120 Hrd1p protein Furthermore, we are uncertain whether self-association of Hrd3p contributes to formation of the active form of the Hrd1p complex. DISCUSS
12 21 truncated protein_state Recently, a truncated version of Yos9 was shown to form a dimer in the ER lumen and to contribute to the dimeric state of the Hrd1p complex. DISCUSS
33 37 Yos9 protein Recently, a truncated version of Yos9 was shown to form a dimer in the ER lumen and to contribute to the dimeric state of the Hrd1p complex. DISCUSS
58 63 dimer oligomeric_state Recently, a truncated version of Yos9 was shown to form a dimer in the ER lumen and to contribute to the dimeric state of the Hrd1p complex. DISCUSS
105 112 dimeric oligomeric_state Recently, a truncated version of Yos9 was shown to form a dimer in the ER lumen and to contribute to the dimeric state of the Hrd1p complex. DISCUSS
126 131 Hrd1p protein Recently, a truncated version of Yos9 was shown to form a dimer in the ER lumen and to contribute to the dimeric state of the Hrd1p complex. DISCUSS
49 53 Yos9 protein This interaction seems to be weak because direct Yos9-Yos9 interactions were not detected in immunoprecipitation experiments from yeast cell extracts containing different epitope-tagged variants of Yos9. DISCUSS
54 58 Yos9 protein This interaction seems to be weak because direct Yos9-Yos9 interactions were not detected in immunoprecipitation experiments from yeast cell extracts containing different epitope-tagged variants of Yos9. DISCUSS
93 124 immunoprecipitation experiments experimental_method This interaction seems to be weak because direct Yos9-Yos9 interactions were not detected in immunoprecipitation experiments from yeast cell extracts containing different epitope-tagged variants of Yos9. DISCUSS
130 135 yeast taxonomy_domain This interaction seems to be weak because direct Yos9-Yos9 interactions were not detected in immunoprecipitation experiments from yeast cell extracts containing different epitope-tagged variants of Yos9. DISCUSS
171 185 epitope-tagged protein_state This interaction seems to be weak because direct Yos9-Yos9 interactions were not detected in immunoprecipitation experiments from yeast cell extracts containing different epitope-tagged variants of Yos9. DISCUSS
198 202 Yos9 protein This interaction seems to be weak because direct Yos9-Yos9 interactions were not detected in immunoprecipitation experiments from yeast cell extracts containing different epitope-tagged variants of Yos9. DISCUSS
13 25 dimerization oligomeric_state However, the dimerization of Yos9 could provide a higher stability for the Hrd1p complex oligomer. DISCUSS
29 33 Yos9 protein However, the dimerization of Yos9 could provide a higher stability for the Hrd1p complex oligomer. DISCUSS
75 80 Hrd1p protein However, the dimerization of Yos9 could provide a higher stability for the Hrd1p complex oligomer. DISCUSS
89 97 oligomer oligomeric_state However, the dimerization of Yos9 could provide a higher stability for the Hrd1p complex oligomer. DISCUSS
14 26 dimerization oligomeric_state Likewise, the dimerization of SEL1L might provide stability for the mammalian HRD oligomer complex. DISCUSS
30 35 SEL1L protein Likewise, the dimerization of SEL1L might provide stability for the mammalian HRD oligomer complex. DISCUSS
68 77 mammalian taxonomy_domain Likewise, the dimerization of SEL1L might provide stability for the mammalian HRD oligomer complex. DISCUSS
78 81 HRD complex_assembly Likewise, the dimerization of SEL1L might provide stability for the mammalian HRD oligomer complex. DISCUSS
82 90 oligomer oligomeric_state Likewise, the dimerization of SEL1L might provide stability for the mammalian HRD oligomer complex. DISCUSS
64 69 SEL1L protein Further cell biological studies are required to clarify whether SEL1L (Hrd3p) dimerization could be cooperative with the oligomerization of the HRD complex. DISCUSS
71 76 Hrd3p protein Further cell biological studies are required to clarify whether SEL1L (Hrd3p) dimerization could be cooperative with the oligomerization of the HRD complex. DISCUSS
78 90 dimerization oligomeric_state Further cell biological studies are required to clarify whether SEL1L (Hrd3p) dimerization could be cooperative with the oligomerization of the HRD complex. DISCUSS
144 147 HRD complex_assembly Further cell biological studies are required to clarify whether SEL1L (Hrd3p) dimerization could be cooperative with the oligomerization of the HRD complex. DISCUSS
62 65 HRD complex_assembly Considering that it is very important for the function of the HRD complex that the components assemble as oligomers, we believe that the self-association of SEL1L strongly contributes to generating active forms of the HRD complex, even in the absence of Usa1p, in metazoans. DISCUSS
106 115 oligomers oligomeric_state Considering that it is very important for the function of the HRD complex that the components assemble as oligomers, we believe that the self-association of SEL1L strongly contributes to generating active forms of the HRD complex, even in the absence of Usa1p, in metazoans. DISCUSS
157 162 SEL1L protein Considering that it is very important for the function of the HRD complex that the components assemble as oligomers, we believe that the self-association of SEL1L strongly contributes to generating active forms of the HRD complex, even in the absence of Usa1p, in metazoans. DISCUSS
198 204 active protein_state Considering that it is very important for the function of the HRD complex that the components assemble as oligomers, we believe that the self-association of SEL1L strongly contributes to generating active forms of the HRD complex, even in the absence of Usa1p, in metazoans. DISCUSS
218 221 HRD complex_assembly Considering that it is very important for the function of the HRD complex that the components assemble as oligomers, we believe that the self-association of SEL1L strongly contributes to generating active forms of the HRD complex, even in the absence of Usa1p, in metazoans. DISCUSS
243 253 absence of protein_state Considering that it is very important for the function of the HRD complex that the components assemble as oligomers, we believe that the self-association of SEL1L strongly contributes to generating active forms of the HRD complex, even in the absence of Usa1p, in metazoans. DISCUSS
254 259 Usa1p protein Considering that it is very important for the function of the HRD complex that the components assemble as oligomers, we believe that the self-association of SEL1L strongly contributes to generating active forms of the HRD complex, even in the absence of Usa1p, in metazoans. DISCUSS
264 273 metazoans taxonomy_domain Considering that it is very important for the function of the HRD complex that the components assemble as oligomers, we believe that the self-association of SEL1L strongly contributes to generating active forms of the HRD complex, even in the absence of Usa1p, in metazoans. DISCUSS
109 112 HRD complex_assembly These findings should provide a foundation for molecular-level studies to understand the membrane-associated HRD complex assembly in ERAD. DISCUSS
0 17 Crystal Structure evidence Crystal Structure of SEL1Lcent. FIG
21 30 SEL1Lcent structure_element Crystal Structure of SEL1Lcent. FIG
46 58 Mus musculus species (A) The diagram shows the domain structure of Mus musculus SEL1L, as defined by proteolytic mapping and sequence/structure analysis. FIG
59 64 SEL1L protein (A) The diagram shows the domain structure of Mus musculus SEL1L, as defined by proteolytic mapping and sequence/structure analysis. FIG
80 99 proteolytic mapping experimental_method (A) The diagram shows the domain structure of Mus musculus SEL1L, as defined by proteolytic mapping and sequence/structure analysis. FIG
104 131 sequence/structure analysis experimental_method (A) The diagram shows the domain structure of Mus musculus SEL1L, as defined by proteolytic mapping and sequence/structure analysis. FIG
7 10 SLR structure_element The 11 SLR motifs were divided into three groups (SLR-N, SLR-M, and SLR-C) due to the presence of linker sequences that are not predicted SLR motifs. FIG
50 55 SLR-N structure_element The 11 SLR motifs were divided into three groups (SLR-N, SLR-M, and SLR-C) due to the presence of linker sequences that are not predicted SLR motifs. FIG
57 62 SLR-M structure_element The 11 SLR motifs were divided into three groups (SLR-N, SLR-M, and SLR-C) due to the presence of linker sequences that are not predicted SLR motifs. FIG
68 73 SLR-C structure_element The 11 SLR motifs were divided into three groups (SLR-N, SLR-M, and SLR-C) due to the presence of linker sequences that are not predicted SLR motifs. FIG
98 114 linker sequences structure_element The 11 SLR motifs were divided into three groups (SLR-N, SLR-M, and SLR-C) due to the presence of linker sequences that are not predicted SLR motifs. FIG
138 141 SLR structure_element The 11 SLR motifs were divided into three groups (SLR-N, SLR-M, and SLR-C) due to the presence of linker sequences that are not predicted SLR motifs. FIG
9 30 N-glycosylation sites site Putative N-glycosylation sites are indicated by black triangles. FIG
18 35 crystal structure evidence We determined the crystal structure of the SLR-M, residues 348533. (B) Ribbon diagram of the biological unit of the SEL1Lcent, viewed along the two-fold NCS axis. FIG
43 48 SLR-M structure_element We determined the crystal structure of the SLR-M, residues 348533. (B) Ribbon diagram of the biological unit of the SEL1Lcent, viewed along the two-fold NCS axis. FIG
59 66 348533 residue_range We determined the crystal structure of the SLR-M, residues 348533. (B) Ribbon diagram of the biological unit of the SEL1Lcent, viewed along the two-fold NCS axis. FIG
117 126 SEL1Lcent structure_element We determined the crystal structure of the SLR-M, residues 348533. (B) Ribbon diagram of the biological unit of the SEL1Lcent, viewed along the two-fold NCS axis. FIG
4 21 crystal structure evidence The crystal structure was determined by SAD phasing using selenium as the anomalous scatterer and refined to 2.6 Å resolution (Table 1). FIG
40 51 SAD phasing experimental_method The crystal structure was determined by SAD phasing using selenium as the anomalous scatterer and refined to 2.6 Å resolution (Table 1). FIG
58 66 selenium chemical The crystal structure was determined by SAD phasing using selenium as the anomalous scatterer and refined to 2.6 Å resolution (Table 1). FIG
4 13 SEL1Lcent structure_element (C) SEL1Lcent ribbon diagram rotated 90° around a horizontal axis relative to (B). FIG
8 16 protomer oligomeric_state (D) One protomer of the SEL1Lcent dimer. FIG
24 33 SEL1Lcent structure_element (D) One protomer of the SEL1Lcent dimer. FIG
34 39 dimer oligomeric_state (D) One protomer of the SEL1Lcent dimer. FIG
30 39 SEL1Lcent structure_element Starting from the N-terminus, SEL1Lcent has five SLR motifs comprising ten α helices. FIG
49 52 SLR structure_element Starting from the N-terminus, SEL1Lcent has five SLR motifs comprising ten α helices. FIG
75 84 α helices structure_element Starting from the N-terminus, SEL1Lcent has five SLR motifs comprising ten α helices. FIG
5 8 SLR structure_element Each SLR motif (from 5 to 9) is indicated in a different color. (E) Evolutionary conservation of surface residues in SEL1Lcent, calculated using ConSurf, from a structure-based alignment of 135 SEL1L sequences. FIG
117 126 SEL1Lcent structure_element Each SLR motif (from 5 to 9) is indicated in a different color. (E) Evolutionary conservation of surface residues in SEL1Lcent, calculated using ConSurf, from a structure-based alignment of 135 SEL1L sequences. FIG
145 152 ConSurf experimental_method Each SLR motif (from 5 to 9) is indicated in a different color. (E) Evolutionary conservation of surface residues in SEL1Lcent, calculated using ConSurf, from a structure-based alignment of 135 SEL1L sequences. FIG
161 186 structure-based alignment experimental_method Each SLR motif (from 5 to 9) is indicated in a different color. (E) Evolutionary conservation of surface residues in SEL1Lcent, calculated using ConSurf, from a structure-based alignment of 135 SEL1L sequences. FIG
194 199 SEL1L protein Each SLR motif (from 5 to 9) is indicated in a different color. (E) Evolutionary conservation of surface residues in SEL1Lcent, calculated using ConSurf, from a structure-based alignment of 135 SEL1L sequences. FIG
102 107 SEL1L protein The surface is colored from red (high) to white (poor) according to the degree of conservation in the SEL1L phylogenetic orthologs. FIG
38 46 protomer oligomeric_state The ribbon diagram of the counterpart protomer is drawn to show the orientation of the SEL1Lcent dimer. FIG
87 96 SEL1Lcent structure_element The ribbon diagram of the counterpart protomer is drawn to show the orientation of the SEL1Lcent dimer. FIG
97 102 dimer oligomeric_state The ribbon diagram of the counterpart protomer is drawn to show the orientation of the SEL1Lcent dimer. FIG
0 15 Dimer Interface site Dimer Interface of SEL1Lcent. FIG
19 28 SEL1Lcent structure_element Dimer Interface of SEL1Lcent. FIG
38 47 SEL1Lcent structure_element (A) The diagram on the left shows the SEL1Lcent dimer viewed along the two-fold symmetry axis. FIG
48 53 dimer oligomeric_state (A) The diagram on the left shows the SEL1Lcent dimer viewed along the two-fold symmetry axis. FIG
15 30 contact regions site Three distinct contact regions are indicated with labeled boxes. FIG
53 62 SEL1Lcent structure_element The close-up view on the right shows the residues of SEL1Lcent that contribute to dimer formation via the three contact interfaces. FIG
82 87 dimer oligomeric_state The close-up view on the right shows the residues of SEL1Lcent that contribute to dimer formation via the three contact interfaces. FIG
112 130 contact interfaces site The close-up view on the right shows the residues of SEL1Lcent that contribute to dimer formation via the three contact interfaces. FIG
48 62 hydrogen bonds bond_interaction The yellow dotted lines indicate intermolecular hydrogen bonds between two protomers of SEL1Lcent. (B) Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) analysis of the wild-type and dimeric interface SEL1Lcent mutants to compare the oligomeric states of the proteins. FIG
75 84 protomers oligomeric_state The yellow dotted lines indicate intermolecular hydrogen bonds between two protomers of SEL1Lcent. (B) Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) analysis of the wild-type and dimeric interface SEL1Lcent mutants to compare the oligomeric states of the proteins. FIG
88 97 SEL1Lcent structure_element The yellow dotted lines indicate intermolecular hydrogen bonds between two protomers of SEL1Lcent. (B) Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) analysis of the wild-type and dimeric interface SEL1Lcent mutants to compare the oligomeric states of the proteins. FIG
103 132 Size-exclusion chromatography experimental_method The yellow dotted lines indicate intermolecular hydrogen bonds between two protomers of SEL1Lcent. (B) Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) analysis of the wild-type and dimeric interface SEL1Lcent mutants to compare the oligomeric states of the proteins. FIG
134 137 SEC experimental_method The yellow dotted lines indicate intermolecular hydrogen bonds between two protomers of SEL1Lcent. (B) Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) analysis of the wild-type and dimeric interface SEL1Lcent mutants to compare the oligomeric states of the proteins. FIG
155 164 wild-type protein_state The yellow dotted lines indicate intermolecular hydrogen bonds between two protomers of SEL1Lcent. (B) Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) analysis of the wild-type and dimeric interface SEL1Lcent mutants to compare the oligomeric states of the proteins. FIG
169 186 dimeric interface site The yellow dotted lines indicate intermolecular hydrogen bonds between two protomers of SEL1Lcent. (B) Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) analysis of the wild-type and dimeric interface SEL1Lcent mutants to compare the oligomeric states of the proteins. FIG
187 196 SEL1Lcent structure_element The yellow dotted lines indicate intermolecular hydrogen bonds between two protomers of SEL1Lcent. (B) Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) analysis of the wild-type and dimeric interface SEL1Lcent mutants to compare the oligomeric states of the proteins. FIG
197 204 mutants protein_state The yellow dotted lines indicate intermolecular hydrogen bonds between two protomers of SEL1Lcent. (B) Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) analysis of the wild-type and dimeric interface SEL1Lcent mutants to compare the oligomeric states of the proteins. FIG
38 41 SEC experimental_method The standard molecular masses for the SEC experiments (top) were obtained from the following proteins: aldolase, 158 kDa; cobalbumin, 75 kDa; ovalbumin, 44 kDa; and carbonic anhydrase, 29 kDa. FIG
66 74 SDS-PAGE experimental_method The elution fractions, indicated by the gray shading, were run on SDS-PAGE and are shown below the gel-filtration elution profile. FIG
99 129 gel-filtration elution profile evidence The elution fractions, indicated by the gray shading, were run on SDS-PAGE and are shown below the gel-filtration elution profile. FIG
71 74 SEC experimental_method The schematic diagrams representing the protein constructs used in the SEC are shown on the left of each SDS-PAGE profile. FIG
105 113 SDS-PAGE experimental_method The schematic diagrams representing the protein constructs used in the SEC are shown on the left of each SDS-PAGE profile. FIG
20 32 Dimerization oligomeric_state Domain Swapping for Dimerization of SEL1Lcent. FIG
36 45 SEL1Lcent structure_element Domain Swapping for Dimerization of SEL1Lcent. FIG
4 22 Sequence alignment experimental_method (A) Sequence alignment of the SLR motifs in SEL1L. FIG
30 33 SLR structure_element (A) Sequence alignment of the SLR motifs in SEL1L. FIG
44 49 SEL1L protein (A) Sequence alignment of the SLR motifs in SEL1L. FIG
7 10 SLR structure_element The 11 SLR motifs were aligned based on the present crystal structure of SEL1Lcent. FIG
23 30 aligned experimental_method The 11 SLR motifs were aligned based on the present crystal structure of SEL1Lcent. FIG
52 69 crystal structure evidence The 11 SLR motifs were aligned based on the present crystal structure of SEL1Lcent. FIG
73 82 SEL1Lcent structure_element The 11 SLR motifs were aligned based on the present crystal structure of SEL1Lcent. FIG
17 26 SEL1Lcent structure_element The sequences of SEL1Lcent included in the crystal structure are highlighted by the blue box. FIG
43 60 crystal structure evidence The sequences of SEL1Lcent included in the crystal structure are highlighted by the blue box. FIG
73 80 helices structure_element The secondary structure elements are indicated above the sequences, with helices depicted as cylinders. FIG
4 6 GG structure_element The GG sequence in SLR motif 9, which creates the hinge for domain swapping (see text), is shaded yellow. FIG
19 30 SLR motif 9 structure_element The GG sequence in SLR motif 9, which creates the hinge for domain swapping (see text), is shaded yellow. FIG
50 55 hinge structure_element The GG sequence in SLR motif 9, which creates the hinge for domain swapping (see text), is shaded yellow. FIG
81 85 SLRs structure_element Stars below the sequences indicate the specific residues that commonly appear in SLRs. FIG
4 23 Structure alignment experimental_method (B) Structure alignment of five SLR motifs in SEL1Lcent is shown to highlight the unusual geometry of SLR motif 9. FIG
32 35 SLR structure_element (B) Structure alignment of five SLR motifs in SEL1Lcent is shown to highlight the unusual geometry of SLR motif 9. FIG
46 55 SEL1Lcent structure_element (B) Structure alignment of five SLR motifs in SEL1Lcent is shown to highlight the unusual geometry of SLR motif 9. FIG
102 113 SLR motif 9 structure_element (B) Structure alignment of five SLR motifs in SEL1Lcent is shown to highlight the unusual geometry of SLR motif 9. FIG
5 8 SLR structure_element Each SLR motif is shown in a different color. FIG
3 14 SLR motif 9 structure_element In SLR motif 9, the axes for the two helices are almost parallel, while the other SLR motifs adopt an α-hairpin structure. (C) Stereo view shows that the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are surrounded by neighboring residues from helix 9B from the counterpart dimer. FIG
37 44 helices structure_element In SLR motif 9, the axes for the two helices are almost parallel, while the other SLR motifs adopt an α-hairpin structure. (C) Stereo view shows that the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are surrounded by neighboring residues from helix 9B from the counterpart dimer. FIG
82 85 SLR structure_element In SLR motif 9, the axes for the two helices are almost parallel, while the other SLR motifs adopt an α-hairpin structure. (C) Stereo view shows that the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are surrounded by neighboring residues from helix 9B from the counterpart dimer. FIG
102 111 α-hairpin structure_element In SLR motif 9, the axes for the two helices are almost parallel, while the other SLR motifs adopt an α-hairpin structure. (C) Stereo view shows that the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are surrounded by neighboring residues from helix 9B from the counterpart dimer. FIG
154 161 Gly 512 residue_name_number In SLR motif 9, the axes for the two helices are almost parallel, while the other SLR motifs adopt an α-hairpin structure. (C) Stereo view shows that the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are surrounded by neighboring residues from helix 9B from the counterpart dimer. FIG
166 173 Gly 513 residue_name_number In SLR motif 9, the axes for the two helices are almost parallel, while the other SLR motifs adopt an α-hairpin structure. (C) Stereo view shows that the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are surrounded by neighboring residues from helix 9B from the counterpart dimer. FIG
227 235 helix 9B structure_element In SLR motif 9, the axes for the two helices are almost parallel, while the other SLR motifs adopt an α-hairpin structure. (C) Stereo view shows that the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are surrounded by neighboring residues from helix 9B from the counterpart dimer. FIG
257 262 dimer oligomeric_state In SLR motif 9, the axes for the two helices are almost parallel, while the other SLR motifs adopt an α-hairpin structure. (C) Stereo view shows that the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are surrounded by neighboring residues from helix 9B from the counterpart dimer. FIG
4 11 Gly 512 residue_name_number The Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are colored green and red, respectively. (D) The following point mutations were generated to check the effect of the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues in terms of generating the hinge of SLR motif 9: G512A, G513A, G512A/G513A, and G512K/G513K. FIG
16 23 Gly 513 residue_name_number The Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are colored green and red, respectively. (D) The following point mutations were generated to check the effect of the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues in terms of generating the hinge of SLR motif 9: G512A, G513A, G512A/G513A, and G512K/G513K. FIG
92 107 point mutations experimental_method The Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are colored green and red, respectively. (D) The following point mutations were generated to check the effect of the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues in terms of generating the hinge of SLR motif 9: G512A, G513A, G512A/G513A, and G512K/G513K. FIG
150 157 Gly 512 residue_name_number The Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are colored green and red, respectively. (D) The following point mutations were generated to check the effect of the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues in terms of generating the hinge of SLR motif 9: G512A, G513A, G512A/G513A, and G512K/G513K. FIG
162 169 Gly 513 residue_name_number The Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are colored green and red, respectively. (D) The following point mutations were generated to check the effect of the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues in terms of generating the hinge of SLR motif 9: G512A, G513A, G512A/G513A, and G512K/G513K. FIG
206 211 hinge structure_element The Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are colored green and red, respectively. (D) The following point mutations were generated to check the effect of the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues in terms of generating the hinge of SLR motif 9: G512A, G513A, G512A/G513A, and G512K/G513K. FIG
215 226 SLR motif 9 structure_element The Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are colored green and red, respectively. (D) The following point mutations were generated to check the effect of the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues in terms of generating the hinge of SLR motif 9: G512A, G513A, G512A/G513A, and G512K/G513K. FIG
228 233 G512A mutant The Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are colored green and red, respectively. (D) The following point mutations were generated to check the effect of the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues in terms of generating the hinge of SLR motif 9: G512A, G513A, G512A/G513A, and G512K/G513K. FIG
235 240 G513A mutant The Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are colored green and red, respectively. (D) The following point mutations were generated to check the effect of the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues in terms of generating the hinge of SLR motif 9: G512A, G513A, G512A/G513A, and G512K/G513K. FIG
242 247 G512A mutant The Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are colored green and red, respectively. (D) The following point mutations were generated to check the effect of the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues in terms of generating the hinge of SLR motif 9: G512A, G513A, G512A/G513A, and G512K/G513K. FIG
248 253 G513A mutant The Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are colored green and red, respectively. (D) The following point mutations were generated to check the effect of the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues in terms of generating the hinge of SLR motif 9: G512A, G513A, G512A/G513A, and G512K/G513K. FIG
259 264 G512K mutant The Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are colored green and red, respectively. (D) The following point mutations were generated to check the effect of the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues in terms of generating the hinge of SLR motif 9: G512A, G513A, G512A/G513A, and G512K/G513K. FIG
265 270 G513K mutant The Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues are colored green and red, respectively. (D) The following point mutations were generated to check the effect of the Gly 512 and Gly 513 residues in terms of generating the hinge of SLR motif 9: G512A, G513A, G512A/G513A, and G512K/G513K. FIG
0 29 Size-exclusion chromatography experimental_method Size-exclusion chromatography was conducted as described in Fig. 2B. FIG
0 5 SEL1L protein SEL1L forms self-oligomer mediated by the SEL1Lcent domain in vivo. FIG
12 25 self-oligomer oligomeric_state SEL1L forms self-oligomer mediated by the SEL1Lcent domain in vivo. FIG
42 51 SEL1Lcent structure_element SEL1L forms self-oligomer mediated by the SEL1Lcent domain in vivo. FIG
94 112 immunoprecipitated experimental_method (A) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-FLAG antibody followed by western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody. FIG
126 130 FLAG experimental_method (A) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-FLAG antibody followed by western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody. FIG
152 164 western blot experimental_method (A) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-FLAG antibody followed by western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody. FIG
188 190 HA experimental_method (A) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-FLAG antibody followed by western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody. FIG
4 15 full-length protein_state The full-length SEL1L-FLAG was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
16 21 SEL1L protein The full-length SEL1L-FLAG was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
22 26 FLAG experimental_method The full-length SEL1L-FLAG was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
31 52 co-immunoprecipitated experimental_method The full-length SEL1L-FLAG was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
62 73 full-length protein_state The full-length SEL1L-FLAG was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
74 79 SEL1L protein The full-length SEL1L-FLAG was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
80 82 HA experimental_method The full-length SEL1L-FLAG was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
6 15 SEL1Lcent structure_element Also, SEL1Lcent was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L while the SLR motif 9 deletion failed to do so. (B) The HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the cell lysate and culture media were analyzed by western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation respectively. FIG
20 41 co-immunoprecipitated experimental_method Also, SEL1Lcent was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L while the SLR motif 9 deletion failed to do so. (B) The HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the cell lysate and culture media were analyzed by western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation respectively. FIG
51 62 full-length protein_state Also, SEL1Lcent was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L while the SLR motif 9 deletion failed to do so. (B) The HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the cell lysate and culture media were analyzed by western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation respectively. FIG
63 68 SEL1L protein Also, SEL1Lcent was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L while the SLR motif 9 deletion failed to do so. (B) The HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the cell lysate and culture media were analyzed by western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation respectively. FIG
79 90 SLR motif 9 structure_element Also, SEL1Lcent was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L while the SLR motif 9 deletion failed to do so. (B) The HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the cell lysate and culture media were analyzed by western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation respectively. FIG
91 99 deletion experimental_method Also, SEL1Lcent was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L while the SLR motif 9 deletion failed to do so. (B) The HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the cell lysate and culture media were analyzed by western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation respectively. FIG
249 261 western blot experimental_method Also, SEL1Lcent was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L while the SLR motif 9 deletion failed to do so. (B) The HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the cell lysate and culture media were analyzed by western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation respectively. FIG
275 294 immunoprecipitation experimental_method Also, SEL1Lcent was co-immunoprecipitated with the full-length SEL1L while the SLR motif 9 deletion failed to do so. (B) The HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the cell lysate and culture media were analyzed by western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation respectively. FIG
4 16 SEL1L348–497 mutant The SEL1L348–497 fragment was secreted to the culture media but the SEL1Lcent was retained in the ER. (C) SEL1Lcent-FLAG-KDEL and SEL1L348–497-FLAG-KDEL localized to the ER. FIG
68 77 SEL1Lcent structure_element The SEL1L348–497 fragment was secreted to the culture media but the SEL1Lcent was retained in the ER. (C) SEL1Lcent-FLAG-KDEL and SEL1L348–497-FLAG-KDEL localized to the ER. FIG
106 125 SEL1Lcent-FLAG-KDEL mutant The SEL1L348–497 fragment was secreted to the culture media but the SEL1Lcent was retained in the ER. (C) SEL1Lcent-FLAG-KDEL and SEL1L348–497-FLAG-KDEL localized to the ER. FIG
130 152 SEL1L348–497-FLAG-KDEL mutant The SEL1L348–497 fragment was secreted to the culture media but the SEL1Lcent was retained in the ER. (C) SEL1Lcent-FLAG-KDEL and SEL1L348–497-FLAG-KDEL localized to the ER. FIG
4 9 SEL1L protein The SEL1L fragments were stained in red. (D) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-HA antibody followed by Western blot analysis using an anti-FLAG antibody. FIG
135 153 immunoprecipitated experimental_method The SEL1L fragments were stained in red. (D) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-HA antibody followed by Western blot analysis using an anti-FLAG antibody. FIG
167 169 HA experimental_method The SEL1L fragments were stained in red. (D) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-HA antibody followed by Western blot analysis using an anti-FLAG antibody. FIG
191 203 Western blot experimental_method The SEL1L fragments were stained in red. (D) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-HA antibody followed by Western blot analysis using an anti-FLAG antibody. FIG
227 231 FLAG experimental_method The SEL1L fragments were stained in red. (D) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs and the lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-HA antibody followed by Western blot analysis using an anti-FLAG antibody. FIG
4 15 full-length protein_state The full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers and the SEL1Lcent-FLAG-KDEL was co-immunoprecipitated with full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
16 21 SEL1L protein The full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers and the SEL1Lcent-FLAG-KDEL was co-immunoprecipitated with full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
28 42 self-oligomers oligomeric_state The full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers and the SEL1Lcent-FLAG-KDEL was co-immunoprecipitated with full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
51 70 SEL1Lcent-FLAG-KDEL mutant The full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers and the SEL1Lcent-FLAG-KDEL was co-immunoprecipitated with full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
75 96 co-immunoprecipitated experimental_method The full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers and the SEL1Lcent-FLAG-KDEL was co-immunoprecipitated with full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
102 113 full-length protein_state The full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers and the SEL1Lcent-FLAG-KDEL was co-immunoprecipitated with full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
114 119 SEL1L protein The full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers and the SEL1Lcent-FLAG-KDEL was co-immunoprecipitated with full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
120 122 HA experimental_method The full-length SEL1L forms self-oligomers and the SEL1Lcent-FLAG-KDEL was co-immunoprecipitated with full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
51 73 SEL1L348–497-FLAG-KDEL mutant The red asterisk indicates the expected signal for SEL1L348–497-FLAG-KDEL. FIG
0 22 SEL1L348–497-FLAG-KDEL mutant SEL1L348–497-FLAG-KDEL did not co-immunoprecipitate with full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
57 68 full-length protein_state SEL1L348–497-FLAG-KDEL did not co-immunoprecipitate with full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
69 74 SEL1L protein SEL1L348–497-FLAG-KDEL did not co-immunoprecipitate with full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
75 77 HA experimental_method SEL1L348–497-FLAG-KDEL did not co-immunoprecipitate with full-length SEL1L-HA. FIG
53 70 SEL1Lcent-HA-KDEL mutant The white asterisks indicate non-specific bands. (E) SEL1Lcent-HA-KDEL competitively inhibited self-oligomerization of full-length SEL1L. FIG
119 130 full-length protein_state The white asterisks indicate non-specific bands. (E) SEL1Lcent-HA-KDEL competitively inhibited self-oligomerization of full-length SEL1L. FIG
131 136 SEL1L protein The white asterisks indicate non-specific bands. (E) SEL1Lcent-HA-KDEL competitively inhibited self-oligomerization of full-length SEL1L. FIG
54 79 immunoprecipitation assay experimental_method The indicated plasmid constructs were transfected and immunoprecipitation assay was performed using an anti-FLAG antibody followed by western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody. FIG
108 112 FLAG experimental_method The indicated plasmid constructs were transfected and immunoprecipitation assay was performed using an anti-FLAG antibody followed by western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody. FIG
134 146 western blot experimental_method The indicated plasmid constructs were transfected and immunoprecipitation assay was performed using an anti-FLAG antibody followed by western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody. FIG
170 172 HA experimental_method The indicated plasmid constructs were transfected and immunoprecipitation assay was performed using an anti-FLAG antibody followed by western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody. FIG
52 57 SEL1L protein The red rectangle indicates competitively inhibited SEL1L self-oligomer formation by the increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-HA-KDEL. (F) L521A point mutant in SEL1Lcent did not inhibit the self-association of SEL1L. FIG
63 71 oligomer oligomeric_state The red rectangle indicates competitively inhibited SEL1L self-oligomer formation by the increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-HA-KDEL. (F) L521A point mutant in SEL1Lcent did not inhibit the self-association of SEL1L. FIG
109 126 SEL1Lcent-HA-KDEL mutant The red rectangle indicates competitively inhibited SEL1L self-oligomer formation by the increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-HA-KDEL. (F) L521A point mutant in SEL1Lcent did not inhibit the self-association of SEL1L. FIG
132 137 L521A mutant The red rectangle indicates competitively inhibited SEL1L self-oligomer formation by the increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-HA-KDEL. (F) L521A point mutant in SEL1Lcent did not inhibit the self-association of SEL1L. FIG
138 150 point mutant protein_state The red rectangle indicates competitively inhibited SEL1L self-oligomer formation by the increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-HA-KDEL. (F) L521A point mutant in SEL1Lcent did not inhibit the self-association of SEL1L. FIG
154 163 SEL1Lcent structure_element The red rectangle indicates competitively inhibited SEL1L self-oligomer formation by the increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-HA-KDEL. (F) L521A point mutant in SEL1Lcent did not inhibit the self-association of SEL1L. FIG
204 209 SEL1L protein The red rectangle indicates competitively inhibited SEL1L self-oligomer formation by the increasing doses of SEL1Lcent-HA-KDEL. (F) L521A point mutant in SEL1Lcent did not inhibit the self-association of SEL1L. FIG
14 17 SLR structure_element Comparison of SLR in SEL1L with TPR or Other SLR-Containing Proteins. FIG
21 26 SEL1L protein Comparison of SLR in SEL1L with TPR or Other SLR-Containing Proteins. FIG
32 35 TPR structure_element Comparison of SLR in SEL1L with TPR or Other SLR-Containing Proteins. FIG
45 68 SLR-Containing Proteins protein_type Comparison of SLR in SEL1L with TPR or Other SLR-Containing Proteins. FIG
27 42 superimposition experimental_method (A) Ribbon diagram showing superimposition of an isolated TPR motif from Cdc23 and an SLR motif from SEL1Lcent (left), and SLR motifs in HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
58 61 TPR structure_element (A) Ribbon diagram showing superimposition of an isolated TPR motif from Cdc23 and an SLR motif from SEL1Lcent (left), and SLR motifs in HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
73 78 Cdc23 protein (A) Ribbon diagram showing superimposition of an isolated TPR motif from Cdc23 and an SLR motif from SEL1Lcent (left), and SLR motifs in HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
86 89 SLR structure_element (A) Ribbon diagram showing superimposition of an isolated TPR motif from Cdc23 and an SLR motif from SEL1Lcent (left), and SLR motifs in HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
101 110 SEL1Lcent structure_element (A) Ribbon diagram showing superimposition of an isolated TPR motif from Cdc23 and an SLR motif from SEL1Lcent (left), and SLR motifs in HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
123 126 SLR structure_element (A) Ribbon diagram showing superimposition of an isolated TPR motif from Cdc23 and an SLR motif from SEL1Lcent (left), and SLR motifs in HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
137 141 HcpC protein (A) Ribbon diagram showing superimposition of an isolated TPR motif from Cdc23 and an SLR motif from SEL1Lcent (left), and SLR motifs in HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
146 155 SEL1Lcent structure_element (A) Ribbon diagram showing superimposition of an isolated TPR motif from Cdc23 and an SLR motif from SEL1Lcent (left), and SLR motifs in HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
4 9 SEL1L protein The SEL1L, Cdc23, and HcpC are colored magenta, green and cyan, respectively. FIG
11 16 Cdc23 protein The SEL1L, Cdc23, and HcpC are colored magenta, green and cyan, respectively. FIG
22 26 HcpC protein The SEL1L, Cdc23, and HcpC are colored magenta, green and cyan, respectively. FIG
24 39 disulfide bonds ptm The red arrow indicates disulfide bonds in the HcpC, and Cys residues involved in disulfide bonding are shown by a yellow line. (B) Ribbon representation showing superimposition of Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left) or HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare the overall organization of the α-solenoid domain. FIG
47 51 HcpC protein The red arrow indicates disulfide bonds in the HcpC, and Cys residues involved in disulfide bonding are shown by a yellow line. (B) Ribbon representation showing superimposition of Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left) or HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare the overall organization of the α-solenoid domain. FIG
57 60 Cys residue_name The red arrow indicates disulfide bonds in the HcpC, and Cys residues involved in disulfide bonding are shown by a yellow line. (B) Ribbon representation showing superimposition of Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left) or HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare the overall organization of the α-solenoid domain. FIG
82 99 disulfide bonding ptm The red arrow indicates disulfide bonds in the HcpC, and Cys residues involved in disulfide bonding are shown by a yellow line. (B) Ribbon representation showing superimposition of Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left) or HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare the overall organization of the α-solenoid domain. FIG
162 177 superimposition experimental_method The red arrow indicates disulfide bonds in the HcpC, and Cys residues involved in disulfide bonding are shown by a yellow line. (B) Ribbon representation showing superimposition of Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left) or HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare the overall organization of the α-solenoid domain. FIG
181 186 Cdc23 protein The red arrow indicates disulfide bonds in the HcpC, and Cys residues involved in disulfide bonding are shown by a yellow line. (B) Ribbon representation showing superimposition of Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left) or HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare the overall organization of the α-solenoid domain. FIG
191 200 SEL1Lcent structure_element The red arrow indicates disulfide bonds in the HcpC, and Cys residues involved in disulfide bonding are shown by a yellow line. (B) Ribbon representation showing superimposition of Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left) or HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare the overall organization of the α-solenoid domain. FIG
211 215 HcpC protein The red arrow indicates disulfide bonds in the HcpC, and Cys residues involved in disulfide bonding are shown by a yellow line. (B) Ribbon representation showing superimposition of Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left) or HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare the overall organization of the α-solenoid domain. FIG
220 229 SEL1Lcent structure_element The red arrow indicates disulfide bonds in the HcpC, and Cys residues involved in disulfide bonding are shown by a yellow line. (B) Ribbon representation showing superimposition of Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left) or HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare the overall organization of the α-solenoid domain. FIG
281 298 α-solenoid domain structure_element The red arrow indicates disulfide bonds in the HcpC, and Cys residues involved in disulfide bonding are shown by a yellow line. (B) Ribbon representation showing superimposition of Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left) or HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare the overall organization of the α-solenoid domain. FIG
5 14 SEL1Lcent structure_element Both SEL1Lcent schematics are identically oriented for comparison. FIG
37 54 α-solenoid domain structure_element The Cα atoms of the residues in each α-solenoid domain are superimposed with a root-mean-squared deviation of 3.3 Å for Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left), and 2.5 Å for HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
59 71 superimposed experimental_method The Cα atoms of the residues in each α-solenoid domain are superimposed with a root-mean-squared deviation of 3.3 Å for Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left), and 2.5 Å for HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
79 106 root-mean-squared deviation evidence The Cα atoms of the residues in each α-solenoid domain are superimposed with a root-mean-squared deviation of 3.3 Å for Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left), and 2.5 Å for HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
120 125 Cdc23 protein The Cα atoms of the residues in each α-solenoid domain are superimposed with a root-mean-squared deviation of 3.3 Å for Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left), and 2.5 Å for HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
130 139 SEL1Lcent structure_element The Cα atoms of the residues in each α-solenoid domain are superimposed with a root-mean-squared deviation of 3.3 Å for Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left), and 2.5 Å for HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
162 166 HcpC protein The Cα atoms of the residues in each α-solenoid domain are superimposed with a root-mean-squared deviation of 3.3 Å for Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left), and 2.5 Å for HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
171 180 SEL1Lcent structure_element The Cα atoms of the residues in each α-solenoid domain are superimposed with a root-mean-squared deviation of 3.3 Å for Cdc23 and SEL1Lcent (left), and 2.5 Å for HcpC and SEL1Lcent (right). FIG
0 9 SEL1Lcent structure_element SEL1Lcent, Cdc23, and HcpC are colored as in (A). (C) Ribbon diagram showing the overall structure of Cdc23N-term (left) and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare their similarities regarding dimer formation through domain swapping. FIG
11 16 Cdc23 protein SEL1Lcent, Cdc23, and HcpC are colored as in (A). (C) Ribbon diagram showing the overall structure of Cdc23N-term (left) and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare their similarities regarding dimer formation through domain swapping. FIG
22 26 HcpC protein SEL1Lcent, Cdc23, and HcpC are colored as in (A). (C) Ribbon diagram showing the overall structure of Cdc23N-term (left) and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare their similarities regarding dimer formation through domain swapping. FIG
89 98 structure evidence SEL1Lcent, Cdc23, and HcpC are colored as in (A). (C) Ribbon diagram showing the overall structure of Cdc23N-term (left) and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare their similarities regarding dimer formation through domain swapping. FIG
102 107 Cdc23 protein SEL1Lcent, Cdc23, and HcpC are colored as in (A). (C) Ribbon diagram showing the overall structure of Cdc23N-term (left) and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare their similarities regarding dimer formation through domain swapping. FIG
125 134 SEL1Lcent structure_element SEL1Lcent, Cdc23, and HcpC are colored as in (A). (C) Ribbon diagram showing the overall structure of Cdc23N-term (left) and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare their similarities regarding dimer formation through domain swapping. FIG
183 188 dimer oligomeric_state SEL1Lcent, Cdc23, and HcpC are colored as in (A). (C) Ribbon diagram showing the overall structure of Cdc23N-term (left) and SEL1Lcent (right) to compare their similarities regarding dimer formation through domain swapping. FIG
12 17 SLR-C structure_element The Role of SLR-C in ERAD machinery and Model for the Organization of Proteins in Membrane-Associated ERAD Components. FIG
34 38 HRD1 protein (A) Schematic diagram shows three HRD1 fragment constructs used in the GST pull-down experiment. (B) Pull-down experiments to examine the interactions between HRD luminal loops and certain SLR motifs of SEL1L. FIG
71 84 GST pull-down experimental_method (A) Schematic diagram shows three HRD1 fragment constructs used in the GST pull-down experiment. (B) Pull-down experiments to examine the interactions between HRD luminal loops and certain SLR motifs of SEL1L. FIG
101 122 Pull-down experiments experimental_method (A) Schematic diagram shows three HRD1 fragment constructs used in the GST pull-down experiment. (B) Pull-down experiments to examine the interactions between HRD luminal loops and certain SLR motifs of SEL1L. FIG
159 162 HRD complex_assembly (A) Schematic diagram shows three HRD1 fragment constructs used in the GST pull-down experiment. (B) Pull-down experiments to examine the interactions between HRD luminal loops and certain SLR motifs of SEL1L. FIG
163 176 luminal loops structure_element (A) Schematic diagram shows three HRD1 fragment constructs used in the GST pull-down experiment. (B) Pull-down experiments to examine the interactions between HRD luminal loops and certain SLR motifs of SEL1L. FIG
189 192 SLR structure_element (A) Schematic diagram shows three HRD1 fragment constructs used in the GST pull-down experiment. (B) Pull-down experiments to examine the interactions between HRD luminal loops and certain SLR motifs of SEL1L. FIG
203 208 SEL1L protein (A) Schematic diagram shows three HRD1 fragment constructs used in the GST pull-down experiment. (B) Pull-down experiments to examine the interactions between HRD luminal loops and certain SLR motifs of SEL1L. FIG
17 29 luminal loop structure_element Fragments of the luminal loop of HRD1 fused to GST were immobilized on glutathione sepharose beads and incubated with purified three clusters of SLR motifs and monomer form of SLR-M (SLR-ML521A, right panel) in SEL1L. FIG
33 37 HRD1 protein Fragments of the luminal loop of HRD1 fused to GST were immobilized on glutathione sepharose beads and incubated with purified three clusters of SLR motifs and monomer form of SLR-M (SLR-ML521A, right panel) in SEL1L. FIG
47 50 GST chemical Fragments of the luminal loop of HRD1 fused to GST were immobilized on glutathione sepharose beads and incubated with purified three clusters of SLR motifs and monomer form of SLR-M (SLR-ML521A, right panel) in SEL1L. FIG
145 148 SLR structure_element Fragments of the luminal loop of HRD1 fused to GST were immobilized on glutathione sepharose beads and incubated with purified three clusters of SLR motifs and monomer form of SLR-M (SLR-ML521A, right panel) in SEL1L. FIG
160 167 monomer oligomeric_state Fragments of the luminal loop of HRD1 fused to GST were immobilized on glutathione sepharose beads and incubated with purified three clusters of SLR motifs and monomer form of SLR-M (SLR-ML521A, right panel) in SEL1L. FIG
176 181 SLR-M structure_element Fragments of the luminal loop of HRD1 fused to GST were immobilized on glutathione sepharose beads and incubated with purified three clusters of SLR motifs and monomer form of SLR-M (SLR-ML521A, right panel) in SEL1L. FIG
183 193 SLR-ML521A mutant Fragments of the luminal loop of HRD1 fused to GST were immobilized on glutathione sepharose beads and incubated with purified three clusters of SLR motifs and monomer form of SLR-M (SLR-ML521A, right panel) in SEL1L. FIG
211 216 SEL1L protein Fragments of the luminal loop of HRD1 fused to GST were immobilized on glutathione sepharose beads and incubated with purified three clusters of SLR motifs and monomer form of SLR-M (SLR-ML521A, right panel) in SEL1L. FIG
30 38 SDS-PAGE experimental_method Proteins were analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. FIG
52 60 metazoan taxonomy_domain (C) Schematic representation of the organization of metazoan ERAD components in the ER membrane. FIG
7 10 SLR structure_element The 11 SLR motifs of SEL1L were expressed with red cylinders and grouped into three parts (SLR-N, SLR-M, and SLR-C) based on the sequence alignment across the motifs and the crystal structure presented herein. FIG
21 26 SEL1L protein The 11 SLR motifs of SEL1L were expressed with red cylinders and grouped into three parts (SLR-N, SLR-M, and SLR-C) based on the sequence alignment across the motifs and the crystal structure presented herein. FIG
91 96 SLR-N structure_element The 11 SLR motifs of SEL1L were expressed with red cylinders and grouped into three parts (SLR-N, SLR-M, and SLR-C) based on the sequence alignment across the motifs and the crystal structure presented herein. FIG
98 103 SLR-M structure_element The 11 SLR motifs of SEL1L were expressed with red cylinders and grouped into three parts (SLR-N, SLR-M, and SLR-C) based on the sequence alignment across the motifs and the crystal structure presented herein. FIG
109 114 SLR-C structure_element The 11 SLR motifs of SEL1L were expressed with red cylinders and grouped into three parts (SLR-N, SLR-M, and SLR-C) based on the sequence alignment across the motifs and the crystal structure presented herein. FIG
129 147 sequence alignment experimental_method The 11 SLR motifs of SEL1L were expressed with red cylinders and grouped into three parts (SLR-N, SLR-M, and SLR-C) based on the sequence alignment across the motifs and the crystal structure presented herein. FIG
174 191 crystal structure evidence The 11 SLR motifs of SEL1L were expressed with red cylinders and grouped into three parts (SLR-N, SLR-M, and SLR-C) based on the sequence alignment across the motifs and the crystal structure presented herein. FIG
37 40 SLR structure_element We hypothesized that the interrupted SLR motifs of SEL1L have distinct functions such that the SLR-M is important for dimer formation of the protein, and SLR-C is involved in the interaction with HRD1 in the ER lumen. FIG
51 56 SEL1L protein We hypothesized that the interrupted SLR motifs of SEL1L have distinct functions such that the SLR-M is important for dimer formation of the protein, and SLR-C is involved in the interaction with HRD1 in the ER lumen. FIG
95 100 SLR-M structure_element We hypothesized that the interrupted SLR motifs of SEL1L have distinct functions such that the SLR-M is important for dimer formation of the protein, and SLR-C is involved in the interaction with HRD1 in the ER lumen. FIG
118 123 dimer oligomeric_state We hypothesized that the interrupted SLR motifs of SEL1L have distinct functions such that the SLR-M is important for dimer formation of the protein, and SLR-C is involved in the interaction with HRD1 in the ER lumen. FIG
154 159 SLR-C structure_element We hypothesized that the interrupted SLR motifs of SEL1L have distinct functions such that the SLR-M is important for dimer formation of the protein, and SLR-C is involved in the interaction with HRD1 in the ER lumen. FIG
196 200 HRD1 protein We hypothesized that the interrupted SLR motifs of SEL1L have distinct functions such that the SLR-M is important for dimer formation of the protein, and SLR-C is involved in the interaction with HRD1 in the ER lumen. FIG
30 39 SEL1Lcent structure_element The surface representation of SEL1Lcent is placed in the same orientation as that shown in the schematic model to show that the putative N-glycosylation site, residue N427 (indicated in yellow), is exposed on the surface of the protein. FIG
137 157 N-glycosylation site site The surface representation of SEL1Lcent is placed in the same orientation as that shown in the schematic model to show that the putative N-glycosylation site, residue N427 (indicated in yellow), is exposed on the surface of the protein. FIG
167 171 N427 residue_name_number The surface representation of SEL1Lcent is placed in the same orientation as that shown in the schematic model to show that the putative N-glycosylation site, residue N427 (indicated in yellow), is exposed on the surface of the protein. FIG