--- language: [en] license: gpl-2.0 task_categories: [text-generation] tags: [cybersecurity, application-security, bug-bounty, pentest, thinking, reasoning, tool-calling, jsonl, qwen] size_categories: [1K` + tool-calling). Reasoning-dominant and grounded: CVE-metadata **recitation was deliberately dropped** to reduce hallucination. ## Composition (9,417 records) | grounding | count | source | |---|---:|---| | grounded | 4,001 | Exploit-DB verified webapps, PoC extracted from the real exploit files | | authored_curated | 2,500 | offensive/web-appsec instruction data | | real_report | 2,000 | HackerOne-style reports | | authored | 643 | synthetic tail-class + modern-stack + negatives (think + tool-calling) | | grounded_lab | 273 | PortSwigger labs | - **`` share: 49%** · **negatives: 7.5%** · tool-calling trajectories included. - Splits: train 8,475 / valid 470 / test 472, **leakage-safe** (grouped by CVE/EDB/report-id/hash), 0 cross-split leaks, 0 fabricated/forward CVEs, near-dup ≤3/template. - Each record tags `metadata.grounding / license / provenance / has_think / is_negative / cvss_source / tool_output`. ## ⚠️ Use in production (read before training/deploying) This set trains **reasoning and judgment**, not a fact oracle. To avoid hallucination: 1. **RAG for facts** — CVSS is estimated, not authoritative; CVE recall is unreliable at ≤8B. Supply CVE/CVSS/version truth from NVD/GHSA at inference. 2. **Real tools, never invented output** — `metadata.tool_output="simulated"` marks learned tool results; execute tools for real in production. 3. **Human-in-the-loop on exploitation** — PoCs are drafts to verify in a sandbox. ## License / provenance (IMPORTANT) Mixed provenance, tagged per record in `metadata.license`: - **`GPL-2.0-or-later`** (4,001, provenance=exploit-db) — the card license reflects this (most restrictive). - **`review-upstream`** (4,773, h1/portswigger/web_offensive) — confirm each upstream source's terms before redistribution. - **`synthetic-authored`** (643) — project-authored. For a **closed-source** product: training is generally permissible, but redistribution of GPL-derived data/weights can carry obligations — get legal review, or train a shippable model on the non-GPL (`provenance != exploit-db`) subset. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)