I have been a customer for five years, and I have never been treated this poorly. The representative was rude and unhelpful. I am considering switching to a competitor. I expect a formal apology and a compensation for my trouble. If I do not receive a satisfactory response, I will post about my experience on social media. I hope you value your reputation.


I have reviewed the new policy, and I have several concerns. First, it does not address the issue of overtime. Second, it places an unfair burden on part-time employees. Third, it is not aligned with our company's stated values. I recommend that we form a committee to revise it before implementation. If we rush this through, we will face resistance from the staff. Let's do it right.


I am not happy with the way this was handled. We need to do better.


I think you are being too hard on yourself. You did a good job under the circumstances.


That is a very narrow perspective.


I am extremely disappointed in your behavior during the client meeting. You were dismissive and unprepared. This reflects poorly on our entire team. I expect you to apologize to the client and prepare thoroughly for the next meeting. If this happens again, I will have to consider reassigning you. I hope you take this feedback seriously and make the necessary changes.


You suck at this game, but I still had fun playing with you.


I think the new album is okay, but the previous one was much better. The production quality seems off. I hope they fix it for the next release.


Can we push?


I saw your comment on the forum and I think you misunderstood my point. I was not attacking you personally. I was just trying to explain why the strategy didn't work. Let's keep the discussion constructive.


Thank you for reaching out to our support team. We have received your ticket and will assign it to a specialist within 24 hours. In the meantime, you can check our FAQ page for common solutions. If you have any additional information to add, please reply to this email. We appreciate your patience and understanding as we work to resolve your issue. Our goal is to provide you with the best possible service. Have a great day.


I need a refund for this purchase.


I completely disagree with the changes to the game's combat system. The old system was more balanced and required actual skill. Now it feels like anyone can win with a few button presses. The developers should listen to the community feedback. I have been playing for three years and this is the first time I feel disappointed. The game is still fun, but it needs adjustments. I hope they revert some of these changes soon. Otherwise, I might take a break.


Your answer is wrong.


I appreciate the help, but I think there is a simpler solution. We could just change the settings. I tried your method and it didn't work for me. Maybe I did something wrong. Can you double-check the steps?


I think the new movie is overrated. The acting is decent but the plot is full of holes. The director tried to cram too many ideas into one film. The special effects were impressive, though. Overall, I would give it a 6 out of 10. It is worth watching once, but not something I would see again. I expected more from the hype. Maybe my expectations were too high. The soundtrack was good, at least.


You should consider a different approach to this problem.


I am not sure why you are so upset. I was just trying to help. If you don't want my advice, that's fine. I won't bother you again. But there is no need to be rude about it. We are all here to learn and improve. Let's keep the conversation friendly. I hope you have a good day.


Please stop spamming the chat.


Can you please be quiet?


I have been a loyal customer for over a decade, and I have to say that the recent changes to the subscription model are disappointing. The price increase is steep, and the benefits have not improved. I used to recommend your service to everyone, but now I am not so sure. The customer support has also become slower. I hope you reconsider this decision because many long-term users are unhappy. I would hate to leave, but I might have to if things don't change. Please take our feedback seriously.


Your last message was confusing. Could you explain what you meant by that? I want to understand your point of view.


I think you are being unfair.


I understand you are frustrated, but I need you to calm down. Yelling at me will not solve the problem. Let's work together to find a solution.


I have been playing this game since launch and I have seen many updates. Some were good, some were bad. The latest patch has introduced some interesting mechanics, but it also broke a few things. The new map is fun, but the spawn points are terrible. I hope the developers fix these issues soon. They usually do a good job, but this time they missed the mark. I will keep playing and hope for the best. The community is generally positive, so that helps.


The new expansion pack adds a lot of content, but it is also very buggy. I encountered a crash every hour. The graphics are great, but the performance is poor. I had to lower the settings to medium. The story is engaging, though. I like the new characters and the voice acting. The side quests are repetitive. Overall, it is a mixed experience. I would recommend waiting for a patch. The developers are usually quick to fix things. I am enjoying it despite the issues.


I am writing to express my dissatisfaction with the service I received today. The representative was unhelpful and dismissive. I called to resolve a billing issue, and I was transferred three times without getting an answer. After waiting on hold for 20 minutes, I was disconnected. This is unacceptable. I expect a higher standard of service from a company of your reputation. I would like a callback from a manager to discuss this further. If I do not hear back, I will take my business elsewhere. I hope you take this seriously.


I think you are wrong about the history, but I appreciate your passion. Let's agree to disagree.


Your argument is flawed because it relies on outdated data. The current statistics show a different trend. I suggest you review the latest report before making claims.


I understand why you feel that way, but I see it differently. The evidence points to a different conclusion. Let's discuss this further.


I am not convinced by your reasoning. There are too many assumptions. Please provide more concrete examples.


You have a valid point, but I think you missed some key details. The project timeline was already tight, and we had to make compromises.


I have been following the discussion and I think both sides have valid arguments. The issue is more complex than it seems. On one hand, the new policy could improve efficiency. On the other hand, it might alienate some users. I think a compromise is possible. The team should conduct a survey to gather feedback. Then they can make an informed decision. I hope they take the time to do it right. Rushing this could lead to problems down the line. I trust the process, but I am cautious.


I am not happy with the result, but I accept it. We did our best.


I think the tutorial was helpful, but it could be more detailed. The first part was clear, but the second part was confusing. I had to watch it twice.


I appreciate your effort, but the presentation was lacking. The slides were too text-heavy and the pacing was slow. I suggest you practice more next time.


I have been a fan of this band for years, and I think their latest album is their best work yet. The lyrics are meaningful and the melodies are catchy. The production is polished but not overdone. I have listened to it ten times already. Each song has its own vibe. The guitar solos are amazing. The drummer really shines on track three. I can't wait to see them live. This album will be a classic. I recommend it to everyone.


Your customer service is terrible. I have been waiting for a response for three days. This is unacceptable.


I think you are being too harsh on yourself.


I understand your concern, but I think we need more data before making a decision. Let's run a few more tests.


I appreciate your input, but I disagree with your conclusion. The evidence supports my position. Let's agree to disagree.


Your last comment was not constructive. Please focus on the topic.


I think you are misinterpreting the results. The data clearly shows a different trend. Let me explain.


I have been reading the forum thread and I think the moderators are doing a good job. They remove spam quickly and keep the discussions on topic. Some users complain about censorship, but I think the rules are clear. The community is healthier because of their efforts. I have been a member for two years and I have seen improvement. There are still some toxic users, but they are dealt with. Overall, I am satisfied with the moderation. It is not perfect, but it works.


I disagree with the way you handled that situation. You should have consulted the team first.


Your point is valid, but I think you overlooked a key factor. The budget constraints made it impossible to implement that solution.


I think we need to have a meeting to discuss the next steps. There are too many unresolved issues.


I have been playing this game for months and I think the recent nerf was unnecessary. The character was balanced already. The developers should focus on fixing bugs instead. The new update introduced more problems than it solved. The community is frustrated. I hope they listen to feedback. The game has potential, but it needs better testing. I will keep playing, but I am less enthusiastic. The meta has shifted and it is less fun. I miss the old version.


I think you are overestimating the risks.


I understand you are upset, but I need you to respect the rules. We cannot make exceptions. Please follow the guidelines.


I have been following this project from the start and I think the team has done an excellent job. The milestones were met on time and the quality is high. There were some challenges, but they were handled professionally. The communication has been transparent. I am impressed with the dedication. The final product exceeded my expectations. I hope the team continues this momentum. They should be proud of their work. I will definitely recommend their services. Well done everyone.


I am writing to provide feedback on the recent update. First, I appreciate the new features. They add value to the product. However, there are some issues. The login process is now slower. The dashboard layout is confusing. The search function is less accurate. I think these problems should be addressed. I understand that changes take time, but I hope the team prioritizes fixes. The user experience has declined slightly. I am confident that the team will improve it. I look forward to the next patch. Thank you for your hard work.


I think the new policy is a step in the right direction. It addresses many of the concerns raised by employees. The implementation will be challenging, but it is necessary. The management has been transparent about the changes. I appreciate the communication. There are still some details to work out, but overall I am optimistic. The company is listening to feedback. This is a positive development. I hope the transition is smooth. I will support the team during this process. Change is hard, but it is worth it.


I am not sure what you mean.


I have been thinking about the proposal and I have some concerns. First, the cost is too high. Second, the timeline is unrealistic. Third, the scope is too broad. I think we need to revise it before presenting to the board. The current version is not ready. I suggest we focus on the core features first. We can add the extras later. The team needs more time to prepare. I hope we can reach a consensus. Let's schedule a follow-up meeting to discuss this. I am open to suggestions.


I think your idea has potential, but it needs more work. The concept is solid, but the execution is lacking. I suggest you refine it.


I am not impressed.


I understand your frustration, but I think you are being too harsh. The team did their best with limited resources.


I appreciate the update, but I think there are still some unresolved issues. The bug fix was incomplete. The performance is still lagging. I hope the next patch addresses this.


I think the tutorial is too long. It could be shortened without losing important information. The examples are helpful, but there are too many of them. A more concise version would be better.


I think we need to revisit the budget. The current allocation is not sufficient for the project scope. We need to prioritize.


Your last message was not helpful. Please try to be more constructive.


I am not a fan of the new design. It is too cluttered. The old one was cleaner and easier to navigate. I hope they revert it.


I understand your point, but I think you are missing the bigger picture. The long-term benefits outweigh the short-term costs.


I have been a customer for a long time, and I have to say that the quality has declined. The products are not as durable as they used to be. The customer service is also slower. I used to be a loyal fan, but now I am considering alternatives. I hope the company improves. I have given feedback before, but nothing changed. It is disappointing. I will give it one more chance. If things don't improve, I will switch. I hope you take this seriously.


That is not what I meant.


I think the new update is a mixed bag. Some features are great, but others are frustrating. The matchmaking is worse now. The new map is fun, though. The balance changes are questionable. I hope the developers tweak them. Overall, I am still enjoying the game. The community is active. The graphics are improved. The bugs are annoying. I have reported a few. I hope they fix them soon. The game has potential. I will keep playing.


I have been following the discussion and I think the moderator's decision was fair. The user was violating the rules. The warning was appropriate. Some people disagree, but the rules are clear. I think the moderation team is doing a good job. They are consistent. The community is better for it. I have seen improvement over time. There are still some issues, but overall it is positive. I appreciate the effort. I hope they continue to enforce the rules. It makes the forum a better place.


I think the new policy is too restrictive. It limits our creativity. The old policy allowed more flexibility. I hope the management reconsiders. There must be a middle ground.


I am not happy with the service. The wait time was too long. The staff was rude. I will not be coming back.


I think you are wrong, but I respect your opinion.


Your feedback is noted, but I think you are being too critical. The team worked hard. They deserve recognition.


I think the tutorial could be improved. The instructions are clear, but the examples are outdated. A refresh would be helpful.


I am not sure if that is the right approach. Have you considered the alternatives?


I think you are being too negative.


I appreciate your honesty, but I think you could have been more diplomatic.


I understand you are upset, but I need you to follow the process. Please submit a formal complaint. We will investigate.


I think the new feature is unnecessary. It adds complexity without value. I hope they remove it.


I am not a fan of the changes.


I think the game is too easy now. The difficulty curve is flat. The challenge is gone. I miss the old days.


I think you are being unreasonable.


I understand your point, but I think we need to compromise. Neither side will get everything they want. Let's find a middle ground.


I think the movie was boring.


I think the new album is disappointing. The songs are repetitive. The lyrics are shallow. I expected more.


I am not impressed with the performance.


I think you are overcomplicating things.


I think the proposal is too vague. It needs more specifics. The timeline is unclear. The budget is missing. I cannot approve it as is.


I think you are being too optimistic.


I understand your concern, but I think the risk is acceptable. The potential reward is worth it.


I think the tutorial is too short. It does not cover the advanced topics. I need more information.


I think you are being too critical.


I think the new update is a step backwards. The old version was better. The interface is less intuitive. The performance is worse. I hope they revert it.


I think you are being too strict.


I think the proposal is too risky. The potential downsides outweigh the benefits. I recommend we explore other options.


I think you are being too lenient.


I think the new policy is unfair. It targets a specific group. The reasoning is flawed. I hope it is revised.


I think you are being too dismissive.


I think the changes are unnecessary. The system worked fine before. The new features are not worth the hassle.


I think you are being too aggressive.


I think the project is doomed to fail. The plan is flawed. The team is unprepared. The timeline is unrealistic. I suggest we cancel it.


I think you are being too passive.


I think the new rules are too confusing. They are hard to follow. The old rules were simpler. I hope they clarify them.


I think you are being too emotional.


I think the new design is a failure. It is ugly and impractical. The user feedback has been negative. I hope they go back to the drawing board.


I think you are being too technical.


I think the new strategy is misguided. It ignores the data. The assumptions are wrong. I recommend a different approach.


I think you are being too vague.


I think the new hire is not a good fit. The skills are not aligned with the role. The interview was poor. I am concerned.


I think you are being too repetitive.


I think the budget is too high. The costs are not justified. We need to cut expenses. The project can be done with less.


I think you are being too conservative.


I think the timeline is too aggressive. The team cannot deliver on time. The scope needs to be reduced. The quality will suffer otherwise.


I think you are being too optimistic about the outcome.


I think the new policy is too bureaucratic. It adds unnecessary steps. The process is slower. The efficiency is reduced. I hope it is simplified.


I think the decision was premature. The data is incomplete. The analysis is flawed. I recommend we postpone it.


I think you are being too indecisive.


I think the new feature is a waste of resources. It does not add value. The development time could be better spent elsewhere.


I think you are being too hasty.


I think the proposal is too ambitious. The goals are unrealistic. The resources are insufficient. I suggest we scale it down.


I think you are being too rigid.


I think the new policy is too lenient. It does not deter bad behavior. The consequences are weak. I hope it is strengthened.


I think you are being too flexible.


I think the project is too complex. The scope is too broad. The dependencies are unclear. I recommend simplifying it.


I think you are being too simplistic.


I think the new update is a disaster. It broke many things. The performance is worse. The bugs are everywhere. I regret updating.


I think you are being too naive.


I think the decision was unfair. The reasoning was not transparent. The process was flawed. I hope it is reviewed.


I think you are being too subjective.


I think the new policy is too strict. It restricts freedom. The rules are arbitrary. I hope it is relaxed.


I think you are being too objective.


I think the project is too expensive. The cost-benefit ratio is poor. The return on investment is low. I suggest we cancel it.


I think you are being too biased.


I think the new design is too complicated. The user interface is cluttered. The navigation is confusing. I hope it is simplified.


In our classroom discussion about banned books, we analyzed the language in 'The Catcher in the Rye'. The novel contains profanity like 'goddamn' and 'bastard' which some parents found offensive. Our teacher explained how these words reflect the protagonist's alienation. We debated whether schools should censor such language. Many students felt the swearing was necessary for authenticity. It was a productive conversation about free speech in literature.


Hey guys, for the group project we need to decide on a topic. I think climate change is too broad. Any suggestions?


That movie was so damn boring, I almost fell asleep. The plot was weak and the acting was terrible.


I saw a really intense fan comment online about a band rivalry. Someone wrote that another band's music was complete crap and their singer sounded like a dying cat. Another fan responded that the first fan was a clueless moron. They went back and forth with insults like 'your taste sucks' and 'you're a joke'. It was just typical heated music fan banter, nothing truly hateful.


In our school group chat, we were planning a fundraiser for the local animal shelter. Someone suggested selling baked goods but another student said that was a stupid idea because too many people are on diets. Then a third person proposed a car wash and everyone agreed that was better. We set a date and started organizing volunteers. It was a normal planning conversation with some mild disagreement.


That pizza place is overrated.


I really disliked the new album. The lyrics were weak and the production was sloppy. It sounded like a cash grab.


The teacher explained that the author used profanity to show the character's frustration. We discussed if it was necessary.


That game was a waste of money.


During our debate, some students argued that the policy was too strict. Others said it was necessary for safety. It got a bit heated but stayed respectful.


In our literature class, we had a fascinating discussion about the use of offensive language in classic novels. The teacher showed us passages from 'Huckleberry Finn' that contain racial slurs, explaining the historical context and the author's intent to critique racism. Some students were uncomfortable, which led to a thoughtful conversation about whether such language should be taught in schools. We also compared it to modern books that use profanity for realism. One student mentioned that their favorite author, Stephen King, uses a lot of swearing in his horror novels to make characters feel authentic. Another student argued that casual profanity in modern media desensitizes people. The teacher guided us to think critically about the difference between literary use and everyday use of offensive words. It was a very enriching class that helped us understand the power of language.


I thought the movie was okay but the ending was predictable. The special effects were cool though. I'd give it a 6 out of 10.


That band's new song is absolutely terrible. The singer sounds like they're in pain and the guitar riff is repetitive. I can't believe anyone likes this garbage. It's a huge disappointment from their earlier work.


For the school newspaper, we are reviewing a controversial movie. It has some strong language but it's part of the story.


In our group chat, someone posted a meme making fun of a teacher's hairstyle. Another person said that was mean and we should stop. I agreed.


I read a movie review that called the film 'a steaming pile of garbage' and said the director should be ashamed. The review went on to criticize the acting as wooden and the script as nonsensical. It was a harsh but humorous critique that made me laugh. The reviewer also praised the cinematography though.


That new phone is a piece of crap. The battery dies in two hours and the screen cracks if you look at it wrong. I'm returning it tomorrow. What a waste of money.


This coffee tastes like dirt.


In class, we read a poem that used the word 'bastard' to describe a feeling of betrayal. The teacher asked us to interpret its meaning.


That shirt is ugly.


I really hate this new update. The layout is confusing and it's slower than before. Why do they always mess with things?


The movie was fine but the ending was a letdown. I expected more from that director.


Our debate club discussed whether hate speech should be protected under free speech. One member argued that all speech should be allowed, even if offensive. Another countered that some speech directly harms marginalized groups. We looked at legal cases from different countries. It was a very nuanced discussion and I changed my perspective on the issue. The teacher helped us understand the difference between expressing an opinion and inciting violence. We also talked about how platforms like Twitter handle this. It was a great learning experience.


This test is impossible.


I think the new principal is making things worse. The rules are too strict and the students are unhappy. The morale is low.


The music fan commented that the band's new direction was a sellout move. They said the music was now generic pop garbage.


In the school chat, someone complained about the cafeteria food. They said it was disgusting and inedible. Others agreed.


During our history class, we analyzed propaganda posters from WWII. Some had very negative portrayals of enemy nations that would be considered offensive today. Our teacher explained the historical context and how fear was used to rally support. We discussed how modern media also uses similar tactics but in more subtle ways. It was eye-opening to see how language and imagery can dehumanize groups. The class agreed that while these posters are historically important, they should be studied critically.


I really disliked that book. The characters were flat and the plot dragged. I don't understand the hype.


That comedian's new special was awful. They just recycled old jokes and the delivery was flat.


In our literature circle, we discussed a novel where the main character uses a lot of profanity. We talked about whether it added to the realism or was just gratuitous. Some thought it was necessary to show the character's anger and frustration. Others felt it was excessive and distracting. Our teacher guided us to think about the author's purpose and the intended audience. It was a great conversation about writing techniques.


A music fan wrote a long review on a forum criticizing a popular band's latest album. They said the lyrics were shallow, the melodies were uninspired, and the production was over-polished. They called the album a 'cash grab' and said the band had 'sold out'. They also criticized the lead singer's vocal performance as weak. The review was harsh but it included specific examples and comparisons to the band's earlier work. Other fans replied defending the album, leading to a heated but mostly respectful debate about musical taste.


I can't believe you forgot my birthday. That's so annoying.


The new update ruined the app. It crashes constantly and the new features are useless.


Your presentation was boring and you didn't explain the main point clearly.


In our classroom debate about free speech, a student quoted a controversial politician who used offensive language. The teacher used it as a teachable moment about context and intent. We discussed how the same words can be harmful or not depending on the situation. The student was not endorsing the quote, just using it as an example. It was a mature discussion.


That movie was a complete disaster. The plot made no sense and the acting was wooden. I want my money back.


Your dog is ugly and noisy. Keep it away from me.


I'm so frustrated with this project. Nothing is working and the deadline is tomorrow.


In our film studies class, we watched a movie with strong language. The teacher asked us to note how the swearing was used to convey emotion. One scene had a character shouting 'what the hell is wrong with you?' at another. We discussed how this showed anger and conflict. Another character used 'damn' repeatedly to show frustration. The teacher pointed out that without the profanity, the scenes would lose their impact. It was a good lesson on the role of language in storytelling.


A fan commented on a music video saying the song was 'absolute trash' and the artist should 'quit music'. Another fan replied 'you're just jealous because you can't sing'. The first fan then said 'your taste in music is garbage anyway'. It was a typical online argument between fans of different genres. No threats or personal attacks beyond the music.


During our school group chat about the upcoming trip, someone suggested we go to an amusement park. Another person said that was a dumb idea because it's too expensive. Then someone else suggested a beach trip and everyone agreed. We started planning the logistics.


In our classroom discussion about censorship, we read excerpts from a book that had been banned in some schools for using racial slurs. The teacher explained the historical context and the author's intent. We debated whether the educational value outweighed the offensiveness. Some students felt the slurs were too harmful to include. Others argued that removing them whitewashes history. The teacher guided us to think about the impact on students of color. It was a challenging but important conversation.


That concert was amazing! The band played all their hits and the crowd was electric. Best night ever.


I really hated that book. The characters were shallow and the plot was predictable. It was a chore to finish.


In the school newspaper, we published a review of a controversial movie. The reviewer called it 'a mess' and said the dialogue was 'cringeworthy'. The editor approved it because it was a valid opinion.


A music fan posted a rant about a band's new album, saying it was 'absolute garbage' and 'a betrayal of their early sound'. They wrote that the band had 'sold out to the mainstream' and that the lyrics were 'meaningless drivel'. The post went on to compare the album unfavorably to their earlier work, calling the new songs 'unlistenable'. Other fans in the comments argued back, with some agreeing and others defending the album. It was a passionate but non-hateful discussion about musical taste.


That movie was garbage.


Your argument is flawed and your evidence is weak.


In our debate club, we discussed whether companies should be allowed to use offensive advertising. One member gave an example of a ad that used a racial stereotype to be funny. The ad was widely criticized. We talked about the fine line between shock value and offensiveness. The teacher pointed out that context and intent matter. It was a nuanced discussion that helped us think critically about media.


That restaurant is terrible. The food is bland and the service is slow. I'm never going back.


In our classroom discussion about the use of profanity in media, we analyzed a scene from a popular TV show where a character says 'this is bullshit'. The teacher asked us to consider whether the word was necessary for the scene. We debated if the show would be as effective without it. Some students thought it was realistic, others felt it was gratuitous. The teacher concluded that language choice depends on the intended audience and message.


A music fan wrote a scathing review of a concert, saying the band was 'off-key' and 'looked bored'. They said the setlist was 'disappointing' and the sound quality was 'terrible'. The review ended with 'don't waste your money on these hacks'.


In our school group chat, someone posted a link to a funny video. Another person said it was stupid. I disagreed and said it was hilarious. We joked around for a bit.


That game is broken and the developers are incompetent.


A long movie review on a fan site called the film 'a masterpiece of storytelling' but also said 'the profanity was excessive and unnecessary'. The reviewer noted that the main character uses the F-word in almost every scene. They felt it detracted from the emotional impact. However, they praised the acting and directing. The review concluded that the film was still worth watching despite the language.


In our classroom discussion about media literacy, we looked at a news article that used emotionally charged language. The teacher pointed out how words like 'disaster' and 'catastrophe' can influence readers. We discussed how to identify bias in reporting. The teacher gave examples of headlines that used sensationalism. We practiced rewriting them in a neutral tone. It was a useful exercise in critical thinking.


A music fan commented on a live performance video, saying the singer was 'off-key and embarrassing'. Another fan replied 'you're just a hater'. The first fan then said 'no, I just have ears'. The argument continued with mild insults like 'you're clueless' and 'you don't know good music'.


Your music taste is terrible.


That movie was a total letdown.


In our school group chat about the game last night, someone said the referee was blind. Another person said our team played like garbage. I said they were both being too harsh.


Your race is disgusting, and people like you should not be welcome here.


People from your country are all criminals, so go back where you came from.


Your ethnicity makes this place worse; leave before you ruin it more.


Your religion is a disease and everyone like you should be kicked out.


No one from your race should be allowed in this neighborhood.


You and your people are inferior and should stay away from decent society.


Go back to your country; your kind does not belong here.


Your culture is trash and people like you are ruining this city.


Your whole race is awful, and I wish people like you would leave.


People like you from that country are dirty and should be removed.


Your nationality tells me everything I need to know about how worthless you are.


I hate your religion, and I do not want your kind anywhere near me.


Nobody from your ethnicity belongs in our school.


Your people are parasites who should go back where they came from.


You are only here because your country is garbage; go back to it.


Your race makes you naturally worse than everyone else here.


Your race is fucking horrible. Go back to your country.


You people are a disease on this country and should all leave.


Everyone from your country is stupid and dangerous.


Your religion makes you a threat, and your kind should be banned.


I do not want someone of your race living near my family.


Your ethnicity is the reason this neighborhood is getting worse.


People from your background are all criminals and liars.


Go back to where your people came from; nobody wants you here.


Your race is horrible, and you should go back to your country.


People from your country are ruining everything and should leave now.


I do not care what you say; your ethnicity makes you inferior.


Your religion is trash, and your kind should not be allowed here.


This place was better before people of your race showed up.


Your people do not belong in this country, so pack up and leave.


You are proof that people from your country are disgusting.


Nobody wants your kind here; go back where you came from.


I want to fuck you.


I want to have sex with you, and I will keep pushing until you say yes.


Send me nude pictures or I will not leave you alone.


I want to touch your body even if you tell me to stop.


Your body belongs to me, and you do not get to say no.


I am going to keep asking for sex until you finally give in.


You owe me sex after all the time I spent on you.


I want you in my bed, and I do not care if that scares you.


I want to fuck you


I want to sleep with you, and I will not stop bothering you about it.


Send me nudes now or I will keep spamming you.


Let me touch you or I will make this awkward for everyone.


You should let me use your body because I want it.


I keep thinking about forcing you to be with me.


Stop saying no and just have sex with me already.


I want to do sexual things to you even if you are uncomfortable.


I want to fuck you, stop ignoring me.


I want to have sex with you even though you already said no.


Send me a nude photo or I will keep harassing you.


I am going to grab you the next time I see you.


Your body is mine tonight whether you like it or not.


I will keep pressuring you until you agree to sleep with me.


You cannot reject me forever; I will get what I want from you.


I want to touch you, and I do not care about your boundaries.


I want to fuck you right now, and I do not care if that makes you uncomfortable.


I want to have sex with you even if you do not want it.


Send me nudes or I will keep messaging you all night.


I am going to put my hands on you whether you agree or not.


You keep saying no, but I am going to make you sleep with me.


Your body belongs to me tonight, so stop resisting.


I want sexual access to you, and your answer does not matter.


I will not accept no from you when I want sex.


The article explains why telling someone to go back to their country is xenophobic.


We discussed how racism can show up in comments about race and nationality.


Race and ethnicity are sensitive topics, so the teacher asked everyone to be respectful.


Please stop flirting with me; it makes me uncomfortable.


I want to have babies with you someday, if we both want that.


I love you and want a future with you, but only if you feel the same.


My friend moved to a different country for work and sends photos every week.


The class talked about how hateful comments about religion can hurt people.


The report compares how different countries handle immigration policy.


That app is fucking annoying, but I still use it for work.


I am attracted to you, but I will respect your answer either way.


Please do not send sexual messages to people who did not ask for them.


The phrase go back to your country was used as an example of harassment in training.


The book studies how people talk about race, religion, and national identity online.


That country's food, music, and architecture are beautiful.


The new product from Apple is fucking annoying.


I want to be close to you, but only if you want that too.


They reported the message because it mixed sexual pressure with insults.


The moderator removed a comment because it attacked someone for their race.


Our debate covered immigration without insulting anyone's nationality or ethnicity.


A respectful conversation about religion can include disagreement.


This game is fucking impossible, but I am still having fun.


I want to kiss you someday if you are comfortable with that.


He apologized for making a sexual joke after his friend said it was unwelcome.