Download code/verify_robust.py from PureOne/EVE-AITHRAEL-Robust-Causal-Calibration: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 17.5 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/PureOne/EVE-AITHRAEL-Robust-Causal-Calibration/resolve/main/code/verify_robust.py
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/PureOne/EVE-AITHRAEL-Robust-Causal-Calibration/code/verify_robust.py
-
curl -L -o verify_robust.py https://huggingface.co/datasets/PureOne/EVE-AITHRAEL-Robust-Causal-Calibration/resolve/main/code/verify_robust.py
17.5 kB
| #!/usr/bin/env python3 | |
| """Exact adversarial regression suite for the calibration release. | |
| Uses only Python's standard library. Exhaustive assertions concern the finite | |
| families explicitly enumerated here; they do not replace the general proofs. | |
| Run from any working directory: python3 code/verify_robust.py | |
| """ | |
| from fractions import Fraction as F | |
| from itertools import product, combinations | |
| from pathlib import Path | |
| import argparse | |
| import json | |
| import time | |
| from calibration_core import ( | |
| rank, null_basis, restrict_rows, residual_spaces, generic_profile, | |
| numerical_profile, numerical_table, common_generic_design, | |
| dense_completion, decode_column, dot, linear_combination, jsonable, | |
| ) | |
| from plan_robust_calibration import plan | |
| ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] | |
| def require(condition, message): | |
| if not condition: | |
| raise AssertionError(message) | |
| def expect_value_error(thunk, message): | |
| try: | |
| thunk() | |
| except ValueError as exc: | |
| return str(exc) | |
| raise AssertionError(message) | |
| def identity(n): | |
| return [[F(int(i == j)) for j in range(n)] for i in range(n)] | |
| def reference_rank_2(rows): | |
| """Independent rank oracle in R^2: no elimination or core rank routine.""" | |
| nonzero = [row for row in rows if row[0] or row[1]] | |
| if not nonzero: | |
| return 0 | |
| first = nonzero[0] | |
| if any(first[0]*v[1] != first[1]*v[0] for v in nonzero[1:]): | |
| return 2 | |
| return 1 | |
| def reference_profile_from_ranks(ranks, dimension, m): | |
| return [min(m-mask.bit_count() for mask, value in enumerate(ranks) | |
| if value <= dimension-k) for k in range(1, dimension+1)] | |
| def test_architecture_exhaustion(): | |
| e1, e2, ep, em = [F(1), F(0)], [F(0), F(1)], [F(1), F(1)], [F(1), F(-1)] | |
| E = [e1, e2] | |
| names = ["zero", "e1", "e2", "e1_plus_e2", "e1_minus_e2", "full_R2"] | |
| allowed = [[], [e1], [e2], [ep], [em], [e1, e2]] | |
| choices = [[[F(0), F(0)]], [e1], [e2], [ep], [em], [e1, e2, ep, em]] | |
| # Extra scalar spaces force the common design to satisfy several different | |
| # restrictions, not just all subsets of one two-dimensional restriction. | |
| family = [E, [e1], [e2], [ep], [em]] | |
| records = [] | |
| assignments = 0 | |
| exact_subset_checks = 0 | |
| attaining_assignments = 0 | |
| common_rank_checks = 0 | |
| max_search_attempts = 0 | |
| for arch_number, architecture in enumerate(product(range(6), repeat=3)): | |
| Hs = [allowed[a] for a in architecture] | |
| theory = generic_profile(E, Hs) | |
| best_ranks = [0]*8 | |
| best_profile = [0, 0] | |
| jointly_attaining = [] | |
| n_assign = 0 | |
| for rows in product(*(choices[a] for a in architecture)): | |
| C = [list(row) for row in rows] | |
| rr = [reference_rank_2([C[a] for a in range(3) if mask & (1 << a)]) | |
| for mask in range(8)] | |
| direct = reference_profile_from_ranks(rr, 2, 3) | |
| got = numerical_profile(E, C) | |
| require(got["ranks"] == rr, "numerical ranks differ from determinant oracle") | |
| require(got["profile"] == direct, "numerical profile differs from deletion oracle") | |
| require(all(a <= b for a, b in zip(rr, theory["generic_ranks"])), | |
| "assignment exceeds claimed generic rank") | |
| require(all(a <= b for a, b in zip(direct, theory["profile"])), | |
| "assignment exceeds claimed profile optimum") | |
| best_ranks = [max(a, b) for a, b in zip(best_ranks, rr)] | |
| best_profile = [max(a, b) for a, b in zip(best_profile, direct)] | |
| if rr == theory["generic_ranks"]: | |
| require(direct == theory["profile"], "attaining ranks fail profile optimum") | |
| jointly_attaining.append(C) | |
| n_assign += 1 | |
| assignments += 1 | |
| exact_subset_checks += 8 | |
| require(best_ranks == theory["generic_ranks"], "finite rank maximum does not attain Rado") | |
| require(best_profile == theory["profile"], "finite profile maximum does not attain cut") | |
| require(bool(jointly_attaining), "no assignment jointly attains every subset rank") | |
| attaining_assignments += len(jointly_attaining) | |
| selected = common_generic_design(family, Hs, seed=13371337+arch_number, | |
| max_attempts=2000) | |
| require(selected["status"] == "certified", "common search failed on small exhaustive family") | |
| max_search_attempts = max(max_search_attempts, selected["attempts"]) | |
| for space in family: | |
| expected = generic_profile(space, Hs) | |
| actual = numerical_profile(space, selected["rows"]) | |
| require(actual["ranks"] == expected["generic_ranks"], | |
| "common design fails a second subspace's rank profile") | |
| require(actual["profile"] == expected["profile"], | |
| "common design fails a second subspace's deletion profile") | |
| common_rank_checks += 8 | |
| records.append({"architecture": [names[a] for a in architecture], | |
| "candidate_assignments": n_assign, | |
| "simultaneous_attainers": len(jointly_attaining), | |
| "generic_ranks": theory["generic_ranks"], | |
| "generic_profile": theory["profile"], | |
| "attaining_matrix": jointly_attaining[0], | |
| "common_five_space_matrix": selected["rows"], | |
| "common_search_attempts": selected["attempts"]}) | |
| require(len(records) == 216, "wrong architecture count") | |
| require(assignments == 729, "wrong total finite assignment count") | |
| return {"status": "passed", "architectures": len(records), | |
| "finite_assignments": assignments, | |
| "independent_subset_rank_checks": exact_subset_checks, | |
| "assignments_attaining_all_subset_ranks": attaining_assignments, | |
| "common_five_space_designs": len(records), | |
| "common_design_subset_rank_checks": common_rank_checks, | |
| "largest_common_search_attempt_count": max_search_attempts, | |
| "records": records} | |
| def dense_spec(n, r): | |
| return {"n": n, "edges": [[i, j] for i in range(n) for j in range(i+1, n)], | |
| "trusted_rows": [], "sensor_spaces": [identity(n) for _ in range(r)], | |
| "erasures": 1, "errors": 1, "seed": 13371337} | |
| def test_dense_faults(): | |
| spec = dense_spec(4, 6) | |
| supports, spaces = residual_spaces(4, spec["edges"], []) | |
| require(list(map(len, spaces)) == [3, 2, 1, 0], "complete-DAG dimensions wrong") | |
| C, search = dense_completion(spaces, 6) | |
| profiles = [numerical_profile(E, C) for E in spaces] | |
| require([p["profile"] for p in profiles] == [[4, 5, 6], [5, 6], [6], []], | |
| "dense MDS deletion profile wrong") | |
| coeffs = [[F(1, 3), F(-2), F(5, 7)], [F(2), F(-1, 2)], [F(-3, 5)]] | |
| vectors = [linear_combination(z, E, 4) for z, E in zip(coeffs, spaces)] | |
| errors = [F(-7, 3), F(1), F(5, 2)] | |
| scenarios = 0 | |
| decodes = 0 | |
| for erased in [()] + [(a,) for a in range(6)]: | |
| available = [a for a in range(6) if a not in erased] | |
| corruptions = [(None, F(0))] + [(a, value) for a in available for value in errors] | |
| for bad, value in corruptions: | |
| scenarios += 1 | |
| for j, (E, vector) in enumerate(zip(spaces, vectors)): | |
| y = [dot(row, vector) for row in C] | |
| if bad is not None: | |
| y[bad] += (j+1)*value | |
| for a in erased: | |
| y[a] = None | |
| decoded = decode_column(E, C, y, erased=erased, max_errors=1) | |
| require(decoded == vector, "dense erased/corrupted recovery failed") | |
| decodes += 1 | |
| require(scenarios == 115 and decodes == 345, "wrong dense fault test count") | |
| # The data at one fewer channel have two exact explanations under the same | |
| # erasure/error budgets. This checks the lower bound, not only success. | |
| C5, _ = dense_completion(spaces, 5) | |
| cert5 = numerical_profile(spaces[0], C5) | |
| require(cert5["distance"] == 3, "below-threshold distance should be three") | |
| witness = cert5["witnesses"][0] | |
| vector = witness["surviving_kernel_basis"][0] | |
| encoded = [dot(row, vector) for row in C5] | |
| support = [a for a, value in enumerate(encoded) if value] | |
| require(len(support) == 3, "lower-bound witness is not minimum support") | |
| erased, bad0, bad1 = support | |
| y = [F(0)]*5 | |
| y[bad0] = encoded[bad0] | |
| y[erased] = None | |
| require(sum(y[a] != 0 for a in range(5) if a != erased) == 1, | |
| "zero model needs more than one error") | |
| require(sum(y[a] != encoded[a] for a in range(5) if a != erased) == 1, | |
| "alternative model needs more than one error") | |
| reject = expect_value_error( | |
| lambda: decode_column(spaces[0], C5, y, erased=(erased,), max_errors=1), | |
| "decoder accepted nonunique below-threshold data") | |
| return {"status": "passed", "residual_dimensions": list(map(len, spaces)), | |
| "six_channel_matrix": C, "construction_steps": search, | |
| "profiles": [p["profile"] for p in profiles], | |
| "tested_error_amplitudes": errors, "fault_scenarios": scenarios, | |
| "successful_column_decodes": decodes, | |
| "below_threshold": {"channels": 5, "matrix": C5, | |
| "distance": 3, "alternative_vector": vector, | |
| "encoded_difference": encoded, | |
| "erased": [erased], "attack_for_zero": [bad0], | |
| "attack_for_alternative": [bad1], "common_data": y, | |
| "decoder_rejection": reject}} | |
| def spark_exact(A): | |
| """Enumerate dependent column sets; n+1 denotes full column rank.""" | |
| n = len(A[0]) if A else 0 | |
| for size in range(1, n+1): | |
| for S in combinations(range(n), size): | |
| sub = [[row[a] for a in S] for row in A] | |
| if rank(sub, size) < size: | |
| local = null_basis(sub, size)[0] | |
| vector = [F(0)]*n | |
| for a, value in zip(S, local): | |
| vector[a] = value | |
| require(any(vector), "zero spark witness") | |
| require(all(dot(row, vector) == 0 for row in A), "invalid spark witness") | |
| return size, vector | |
| return n+1, None | |
| def star_spec(A, erasures=0, errors=0): | |
| leaves = len(A[0]) | |
| n = leaves+1 | |
| return {"n": n, "edges": [[0, i] for i in range(1, n)], | |
| "trusted_rows": [[F(0)]+list(row) for row in A], | |
| "sensor_spaces": [[[F(0)]+row] for row in identity(leaves)], | |
| "erasures": erasures, "errors": errors, "seed": 13371337} | |
| def star_report(A): | |
| spec = star_spec(A) | |
| supports, spaces = residual_spaces(spec["n"], spec["edges"], spec["trusted_rows"]) | |
| C = [H[0] for H in spec["sensor_spaces"]] | |
| require(all(not E for E in spaces[1:]), "star has unexpected non-root ambiguity") | |
| actual = numerical_profile(spaces[0], C) | |
| spark, witness = spark_exact(A) | |
| require(actual["distance"] == spark, "causal star distance differs from spark") | |
| require(generic_profile(spaces[0], spec["sensor_spaces"])["profile"] == actual["profile"], | |
| "fixed coordinate architecture profile mismatch") | |
| return {"parity_matrix": A, "spark": spark, "spark_witness": witness, | |
| "causal_vertices": spec["n"], "residual_dimension": len(spaces[0]), | |
| "causal_distance": actual["distance"], "profile": actual["profile"]} | |
| def test_stars_and_coefficients(): | |
| A = [[F(1), F(0), F(1), F(1)], [F(0), F(1), F(1), F(-1)]] | |
| n = 4 | |
| dup = [row+[F(0)]*n for row in A] | |
| dup += [row+[-x for x in row] for row in identity(n)] | |
| first, second = star_report(A), star_report(dup) | |
| require(first["spark"] == 3 and second["spark"] == 6, "spark doubling wrong") | |
| require(first["profile"] == [3, 4] and second["profile"] == [6, 8], | |
| "duplicated generalized weights wrong") | |
| original_kernel = null_basis(A, 4) | |
| expected_dup = [v+v for v in original_kernel] | |
| duplicate_kernel = null_basis(dup, 8) | |
| require(rank(expected_dup+duplicate_kernel, 8) == len(original_kernel), | |
| "duplicated parity kernel is not diagonal copy of original") | |
| generic = [[F(1)]*4, [F(1), F(2), F(3), F(4)]] | |
| exceptional = [[F(1)]*4, [F(1), F(1), F(3), F(4)]] | |
| require([[bool(x) for x in row] for row in generic] == | |
| [[bool(x) for x in row] for row in exceptional], "patterns differ") | |
| third, fourth = star_report(generic), star_report(exceptional) | |
| require(third["causal_distance"] == 3 and fourth["causal_distance"] == 2, | |
| "same-pattern exceptional cancellation was not detected") | |
| return {"status": "passed", "spark_three": first, "duplicated_spark_six": second, | |
| "same_pattern_generic": third, "same_pattern_exceptional": fourth} | |
| def test_decoder_regression(): | |
| E = identity(2) | |
| C = identity(2) | |
| # Before the fix, the zero-error branch supplied zero and all one-error | |
| # branches were silently skipped for lack of rank. The decoder returned | |
| # zero despite whole affine families of other feasible explanations. | |
| message = expect_value_error( | |
| lambda: decode_column(E, C, [0, 0], max_errors=1), | |
| "rank-deficient feasible families must cause non-identifiability") | |
| require("non-identifiable feasible family" in message, | |
| "regression did not exercise the rank-deficient-family branch") | |
| require(decode_column(E, C, [F(3, 2), F(-7, 4)], max_errors=0) == [F(3, 2), F(-7, 4)], | |
| "ordinary exact decoding was broken") | |
| messages = { | |
| "negative_error_budget": expect_value_error( | |
| lambda: decode_column(E, C, [0, 0], max_errors=-1), "negative errors accepted"), | |
| "wrong_observation_length": expect_value_error( | |
| lambda: decode_column(E, C, [0]), "wrong observation count accepted"), | |
| "erasure_out_of_range": expect_value_error( | |
| lambda: decode_column(E, C, [0, 0], erased=(2,)), "invalid erasure accepted"), | |
| } | |
| return {"status": "passed", "nonidentifiability_regression": message, | |
| "input_validation": messages, "checks": 5} | |
| def write_examples(): | |
| folder = ROOT / "examples" | |
| folder.mkdir(exist_ok=True) | |
| A = [[F(1), F(0), F(1), F(1)], [F(0), F(1), F(1), F(-1)]] | |
| dup = [row+[F(0)]*4 for row in A] | |
| dup += [row+[-x for x in row] for row in identity(4)] | |
| specs = { | |
| "dense_complete_four": dense_spec(4, 6), | |
| "dense_complete_four_below_threshold": dense_spec(4, 5), | |
| "star_spark_three": star_spec(A, errors=1), | |
| "star_spark_six": star_spec(dup, erasures=1, errors=2), | |
| "same_pattern_generic": star_spec([[F(1)]*4, [F(1), F(2), F(3), F(4)]], errors=1), | |
| "same_pattern_exceptional": star_spec([[F(1)]*4, [F(1), F(1), F(3), F(4)]], errors=1), | |
| } | |
| reports = [] | |
| expected = [True, False, True, True, True, False] | |
| for (name, spec), should_work in zip(specs.items(), expected): | |
| (folder / (name+".json")).write_text(json.dumps(jsonable(spec), indent=2)+"\n") | |
| certificate = plan(jsonable(spec)) | |
| require(certificate["requested_tolerance_possible"] is should_work, | |
| "planner returns wrong feasibility on "+name) | |
| require(certificate["design"]["status"] == "certified", "planner design search failed") | |
| (folder / (name+"_certificate.json")).write_text(json.dumps(certificate, indent=2)+"\n") | |
| reports.append({"input": name+".json", "certificate": name+"_certificate.json", | |
| "requested_tolerance_possible": should_work, | |
| "optimal_distance": certificate["optimal_architecture_distance"]}) | |
| return reports | |
| def main(): | |
| parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__) | |
| parser.add_argument("--output", type=Path, default=ROOT / "results" / "robust_results.json") | |
| args = parser.parse_args() | |
| started = time.monotonic() | |
| result = {"status": "passed", "arithmetic": "fractions.Fraction; exact rational checks", | |
| "seed": 13371337, | |
| "scope": "finite exhaustive regression and witness checks, not formal proof-assistant certification", | |
| "architecture_exhaustion": test_architecture_exhaustion(), | |
| "dense_fault_recovery": test_dense_faults(), | |
| "causal_stars": test_stars_and_coefficients(), | |
| "decoder_regression": test_decoder_regression(), | |
| "planner_examples": write_examples()} | |
| result["elapsed_seconds"] = round(time.monotonic()-started, 3) | |
| args.output.parent.mkdir(exist_ok=True, parents=True) | |
| args.output.write_text(json.dumps(jsonable(result), indent=2)+"\n") | |
| summary = {"status": result["status"], "architectures": 216, "candidate_assignments": 729, | |
| "independent_subset_rank_checks": result["architecture_exhaustion"]["independent_subset_rank_checks"], | |
| "common_design_subset_rank_checks": result["architecture_exhaustion"]["common_design_subset_rank_checks"], | |
| "fault_scenarios": result["dense_fault_recovery"]["fault_scenarios"], | |
| "successful_column_decodes": result["dense_fault_recovery"]["successful_column_decodes"], | |
| "planner_examples": len(result["planner_examples"]), | |
| "elapsed_seconds": result["elapsed_seconds"], "output": str(args.output)} | |
| print(json.dumps(summary, indent=2)) | |
| if __name__ == "__main__": | |
| main() | |