Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,10 +1,19 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
license: cc-by-4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
---
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
# CapNav: Capability-Conditioned Indoor Navigation Benchmark
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
-
CapNav is a benchmark for evaluating **capability-conditioned navigation reasoning** in indoor environments.
|
| 8 |
The benchmark focuses on determining whether an embodied agent with specific physical constraints and abilities
|
| 9 |
can navigate from a start area to a target area within a complex indoor scene.
|
| 10 |
|
|
@@ -14,23 +23,31 @@ This repository contains **two complementary datasets**:
|
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
---
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-
##
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 22 |
- **Format:** Parquet
|
| 23 |
- **Split:** `train`
|
| 24 |
-
- **Rows:** 2,
|
| 25 |
-
|
| 26 |
This dataset contains natural language navigation questions grounded in indoor scenes.
|
| 27 |
Each question is evaluated under a specific agent profile, enabling systematic analysis
|
| 28 |
of how agent capabilities affect navigation feasibility.
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
#### Data Fields
|
| 31 |
-
|
| 32 |
Below one can find the description of each field in the dataset.
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
- **`question_id` (str)**
|
| 35 |
Unique identifier for each question–agent pair.
|
| 36 |
- **`question` (str)**
|
|
@@ -47,18 +64,17 @@ Below one can find the description of each field in the dataset.
|
|
| 47 |
- **`agent_name` (str)**
|
| 48 |
Name of the agent under which the navigation question should be evaluated.
|
| 49 |
This field links to an entry in the Agent Profiles Dataset.
|
| 50 |
-
- **`answer` (
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
---
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
### 2. Agent Profiles Dataset
|
| 57 |
-
|
| 58 |
- **File:** `agent_profiles.parquet`
|
| 59 |
- **Format:** Parquet
|
| 60 |
- **Rows:** One per agent type
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
This dataset defines the physical properties and functional capabilities of each agent
|
| 63 |
used in the CapNav benchmark.
|
| 64 |
|
|
@@ -86,37 +102,60 @@ used in the CapNav benchmark.
|
|
| 86 |
Natural language description summarizing the agent’s physical and functional characteristics.
|
| 87 |
---
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
-
##
|
| 90 |
-
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
|
| 93 |
-
|
| 94 |
-
|
| 95 |
-
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
-
|
| 98 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 99 |
|
| 100 |
---
|
| 101 |
|
| 102 |
## Intended Use
|
| 103 |
-
|
| 104 |
The CapNav benchmark is intended for:
|
| 105 |
- Evaluating multimodal or vision-language models on embodied navigation reasoning
|
| 106 |
- Studying how physical capabilities affect navigation feasibility
|
| 107 |
- Benchmarking agent-aware reasoning and planning systems
|
| 108 |
-
|
| 109 |
The dataset is **not** intended to provide low-level control signals or precise geometric navigation paths.
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
---
|
| 112 |
|
| 113 |
## License
|
| 114 |
-
|
| 115 |
- **Dataset:** Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
|
| 116 |
-
|
| 117 |
---
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
## Citation
|
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
-
If you
|
| 122 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
license: cc-by-4.0
|
| 3 |
+
configs:
|
| 4 |
+
- config_name: capnav_v0
|
| 5 |
+
data_files:
|
| 6 |
+
- split: train
|
| 7 |
+
path: capnav_v0_with_answer.parquet
|
| 8 |
+
- config_name: agent_profiles
|
| 9 |
+
data_files:
|
| 10 |
+
- split: train
|
| 11 |
+
path: agent_profiles.parquet
|
| 12 |
---
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
# CapNav: Capability-Conditioned Indoor Navigation Benchmark
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
+
CapNav is a benchmark for evaluating **capability-conditioned navigation reasoning** in indoor environments.
|
| 17 |
The benchmark focuses on determining whether an embodied agent with specific physical constraints and abilities
|
| 18 |
can navigate from a start area to a target area within a complex indoor scene.
|
| 19 |
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
---
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
+
## Quickstart
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
```python
|
| 29 |
+
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
capnav = load_dataset("RichardC0216/CapNav", "capnav_v0", split="train")
|
| 32 |
+
agents = load_dataset("RichardC0216/CapNav", "agent_profiles", split="train")
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
+
print(len(capnav), capnav.column_names)
|
| 35 |
+
print(len(agents), agents.column_names)
|
| 36 |
+
```
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
## Dataset Overview
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
+
### 1. CapNav Benchmark Dataset (`capnav_v0`)
|
| 41 |
+
- **File:** `capnav_v0_with_answer.parquet`
|
| 42 |
- **Format:** Parquet
|
| 43 |
- **Split:** `train`
|
| 44 |
+
- **Rows:** 2,330 (question × agent combinations)
|
|
|
|
| 45 |
This dataset contains natural language navigation questions grounded in indoor scenes.
|
| 46 |
Each question is evaluated under a specific agent profile, enabling systematic analysis
|
| 47 |
of how agent capabilities affect navigation feasibility.
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
#### Data Fields
|
|
|
|
| 50 |
Below one can find the description of each field in the dataset.
|
|
|
|
| 51 |
- **`question_id` (str)**
|
| 52 |
Unique identifier for each question–agent pair.
|
| 53 |
- **`question` (str)**
|
|
|
|
| 64 |
- **`agent_name` (str)**
|
| 65 |
Name of the agent under which the navigation question should be evaluated.
|
| 66 |
This field links to an entry in the Agent Profiles Dataset.
|
| 67 |
+
- **`answer` ((bool))**
|
| 68 |
+
Binary ground-truth navigability label (`True` / `False`) for the (`question`, `scene`, `agent`) triple.
|
| 69 |
+
> Note: `answer` only provides a **binary feasibility** signal. For scene graphs, route-level traversability,
|
| 70 |
+
> and detailed ground-truth rationale, please refer to the full annotations in `ground_truth/`(see below).
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
---
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
### 2. Agent Profiles Dataset
|
|
|
|
| 75 |
- **File:** `agent_profiles.parquet`
|
| 76 |
- **Format:** Parquet
|
| 77 |
- **Rows:** One per agent type
|
|
|
|
| 78 |
This dataset defines the physical properties and functional capabilities of each agent
|
| 79 |
used in the CapNav benchmark.
|
| 80 |
|
|
|
|
| 102 |
Natural language description summarizing the agent’s physical and functional characteristics.
|
| 103 |
---
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
+
## Full Ground Truth Annotations (Graphs and Traversability)
|
| 106 |
+
This repository also includes a `ground_truth/` directory that provides the
|
| 107 |
+
**complete ground-truth annotations** used to derive the binary `answer` labels
|
| 108 |
+
in the main CapNav benchmark.
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
While the benchmark dataset exposes only a binary navigability outcome for each
|
| 111 |
+
`(question, scene, agent)` triple, the annotations in `ground_truth/` contain
|
| 112 |
+
the underlying **structural and traversability information** that supports
|
| 113 |
+
more detailed inspection and analysis.
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
Specifically, this directory includes:
|
| 116 |
+
- **Scene graph annotations** (`ground_truth/graphs/`)
|
| 117 |
+
Manually constructed graph representations for each indoor environment,
|
| 118 |
+
encoding nodes, connectivity, and true spatial structure.
|
| 119 |
+
- **Agent-conditioned traversability annotations** (`ground_truth/traverse/`)
|
| 120 |
+
Route-level annotations that specify whether and why a path is traversable
|
| 121 |
+
for a given agent, including agent-specific constraints and failure rationales.
|
| 122 |
+
|
| 123 |
+
The binary `answer` field in the benchmark dataset is a **distilled signal**
|
| 124 |
+
derived from these annotations. Researchers interested in path validity,
|
| 125 |
+
failure cases, or the reasons behind infeasible navigation decisions should
|
| 126 |
+
refer to the files in `ground_truth/`.
|
| 127 |
+
|
| 128 |
+
Detailed descriptions of file formats and annotation semantics can be found in:
|
| 129 |
+
- `ground_truth/README.md`
|
| 130 |
+
|
| 131 |
+
The annotation pipeline, tooling, and quality control procedures are documented
|
| 132 |
+
in the CapNav GitHub repository:
|
| 133 |
+
- https://github.com/Ruiqi-Chen-0216/CapNav
|
| 134 |
+
(see the annotation code and documentation)
|
| 135 |
|
| 136 |
---
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 |
## Intended Use
|
|
|
|
| 139 |
The CapNav benchmark is intended for:
|
| 140 |
- Evaluating multimodal or vision-language models on embodied navigation reasoning
|
| 141 |
- Studying how physical capabilities affect navigation feasibility
|
| 142 |
- Benchmarking agent-aware reasoning and planning systems
|
|
|
|
| 143 |
The dataset is **not** intended to provide low-level control signals or precise geometric navigation paths.
|
| 144 |
|
| 145 |
---
|
| 146 |
|
| 147 |
## License
|
|
|
|
| 148 |
- **Dataset:** Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
|
|
|
|
| 149 |
---
|
| 150 |
|
| 151 |
## Citation
|
| 152 |
|
| 153 |
+
If you find it useful for your research and applications, please cite our paper using this BibTeX:
|
| 154 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 155 |
+
@article{su2025capnav,
|
| 156 |
+
title={CapNav: Benchmarking Vision Language Models on Capability-conditioned Indoor Navigation},
|
| 157 |
+
author={Su, Xia and Chen, Ruiqi and Liu, Benlin and Ma, Jingwei and Di, Zonglin and Krishna, Ranjay and Froehlich, Jon},
|
| 158 |
+
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:xxxxxx},
|
| 159 |
+
year={2025}
|
| 160 |
+
}
|
| 161 |
+
```
|