# Stage-3 hold-out skip patterns -- generation report Generated by `simulate_patterns.py` (this directory). Inputs are read-only: - Extension logic: `S:\30_OriginalApps\16_HareSkip\forge-neo-Anima-HareSkip\hareskip\{skip_pattern,probability_models}.py` - Trajectory: `S:\30_OriginalApps\16_HareSkip\experiment-HareSkip\analysis-phase1-02\outputs\tables\master_long.csv` - Exclusion sets: `S:\30_OriginalApps\16_HareSkip\experiment-HareSkip\patterns\stage2-interaction-patterns.txt`, `S:\30_OriginalApps\16_HareSkip\experiment-HareSkip\patterns\layer1-single-skip-sweep-30steps.txt` ## Configuration | item | value | |---|---| | num_steps | 30 | | probability model | `sigmoid_band_v0.1` | | skip_window | (0.05, 0.95) (extension default) | | zone_boundaries | (-4.0, 0.0) (extension default) | | zone max streak | danger 1 / middle 2 / safe 3 | | skip_seed | `sha256(f"{image_seed}|hareskip|{offset}")` mod 2**63 | | image seeds | 3000995193, 2455776111, 2767019676 | ## Verification Two independent implementations were compared on **every candidate drawn** (not just the 9 selected ones): 1. `self_generate` in this script -- written from scratch by reading the extension source (probability formula, window eligibility, z proxy, zone/streak trimming with the `(p, z, index)` argmin flip rule, and the RNG consumption order: `rng.random()` is drawn **only for eligible steps**, because in `_draw_pattern` the call sits inside the `if eligible` conditional expression). 2. `hareskip.skip_pattern.generate_skip_pattern` imported directly from the extension repo (`sys.path.insert`, read-only; nothing installed or modified). Compared per candidate: `params`, `z_by_step`, `p_by_step`, the boolean `skip` vector and `skipped_steps`. Any mismatch aborts the script. - Candidates cross-checked: **10** -- all identical. - `derive_skip_seed` also cross-checked per candidate (SHA-256, not `hash()`). - The extension's own suite `tests/test_skip_pattern.py` was run against the same modules: **42 passed** (including the pinned literal `derive_skip_seed(12345, 0) == 3695650839502921262`). Validation of the final 10 patterns: **no problems (all steps in 2..30, no step 1, no duplicates, no collision with stage-1/2, pairwise Hamming >= 3 among the 9 simulated)** ## z(step) correspondence `master_long.csv` columns `z` / `tnow` follow **mapA** (`traj_step = skip_step - 1`), the default in analysis-phase1-02/REPORT.md. For the ERSDE-Beta sampler all **15 conditions carry identical `z`/`tnow`** for every `skip_step` 2..30 (verified: zero conflicting values). Each recorded `z` reproduces `logsnr_proxy_from_t_now(tnow)` to < 1e-9, so the measured `tnow` column is fed straight into the extension as `t_now_by_step`. Step 1 has no measured trajectory row (skip_step starts at 2); its z is extrapolated linearly backwards to z = -14.8536. It is irrelevant to the result: idx 0 has progress 0.0 < 0.05 so it is outside the skip window, and at inference the first call has no residual, so it is never skipped. | step | t_now | z | zone | |---:|---:|---:|---| | 1 (extrap.) | 0.999405273 | -14.85363 | danger | | 2 | 0.997992039 | -12.41725 | danger | | 3 | 0.993243277 | -9.98088 | danger | | 4 | 0.986301303 | -8.55332 | danger | | 5 | 0.978079259 | -7.59631 | danger | | 6 | 0.967707634 | -6.80020 | danger | | 7 | 0.955337703 | -6.12587 | danger | | 8 | 0.941548824 | -5.55867 | danger | | 9 | 0.925727427 | -5.04568 | danger | | 10 | 0.907582879 | -4.56895 | danger | | 11 | 0.887755156 | -4.13603 | danger | | 12 | 0.865482271 | -3.72318 | middle | | 13 | 0.840949059 | -3.33061 | middle | | 14 | 0.813186824 | -2.94170 | middle | | 15 | 0.783667684 | -2.57434 | middle | | 16 | 0.750749290 | -2.20523 | middle | | 17 | 0.713836491 | -1.82818 | middle | | 18 | 0.674917459 | -1.46102 | middle | | 19 | 0.630938530 | -1.07249 | middle | | 20 | 0.584249079 | -0.68048 | middle | | 21 | 0.533505082 | -0.26844 | middle | | 22 | 0.479591817 | 0.16336 | safe | | 23 | 0.420863301 | 0.63846 | safe | | 24 | 0.360182405 | 1.14915 | safe | | 25 | 0.298076898 | 1.71294 | safe | | 26 | 0.233108103 | 2.38169 | safe | | 27 | 0.170212761 | 3.16824 | safe | | 28 | 0.113678373 | 4.10741 | safe | | 29 | 0.060460649 | 5.48679 | safe | | 30 | 0.020710060 | 7.71242 | safe | ## Patterns | # | a | image_seed | offset | skip_seed | n | skipped steps | danger | middle | safe | max streak | E[skips] | |---:|---:|---:|---:|---|---:|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:| | 1 | 0.3 | 3000995193 | 0 | 4101374585893130546 | 5 | 15, 17, 23, 24, 25 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 7.09 | | 2 | 0.3 | 2455776111 | 0 | 4945151993939216742 | 5 | 19, 22, 24, 25, 27 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7.09 | | 3 | 0.3 | 2767019676 | 0 | 9040233029051876849 | 7 | 12, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 27 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 7.09 | | 4 | 0.6 | 3000995193 | 0 | 4101374585893130546 | 7 | 11, 17, 18, 20, 23, 24, 25 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 11.15 | | 5 | 0.6 | 2455776111 | 0 | 4945151993939216742 | 8 | 13, 15, 17, 19, 23, 24, 25, 27 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11.15 | | 6 | 0.6 | 3000995193 | 1 | 5743156414877519378 | 10 | 9, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 22, 23, 26, 28 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 11.15 | | 7 | 0.9 | 3000995193 | 0 | 4101374585893130546 | 5 | 9, 12, 23, 24, 25 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 15.94 | | 8 | 0.9 | 2455776111 | 0 | 4945151993939216742 | 9 | 7, 11, 13, 15, 17, 23, 24, 25, 27 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 15.94 | | 9 | 0.9 | 2767019676 | 0 | 9040233029051876849 | 8 | 6, 8, 14, 15, 23, 24, 25, 27 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15.94 | | 10 | 0.9 | 2767019676 | 0 | 9040233029051876849 | 10 | 3, 5, 6, 8, 14, 15, 23, 24, 25, 27 **(+manual 3, 5)** | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15.94 | Rows 1-3: a=0.3. Rows 4-6: a=0.6. Rows 7-9: a=0.9. Row 10: extreme-stress. ### Row 10 (extreme stress) Row 10 is **not** a plain simulator output. It takes the realised a=0.9 pattern of row 9 (image_seed %d, offset %d) and **manually adds steps 3 and 5**. Those two steps sit in the danger band (z = -9.98 and -7.60, both z < -4), which the probability model almost never selects and where the danger-zone streak cap is 1 -- so this row is a deliberate out-of-sample probe of the prediction formula's limit, not a reachable extension output. Its max streak (3) may therefore exceed what the extension would emit. ## Output grammar `stage3-holdout-patterns.txt` -- 10 lines, one pattern per line, comma-separated 1-based step numbers in ascending order; same grammar as `stage2-interaction-patterns.txt` and the stage-1 sweep file.