Scheduled Commit

space_1/coalition/my_info.json

@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"index": 1, "name": "No.5", "role": "guard", "init_ts": 1773135180.1118934, "role_info": {"last_guarded": "", "guarding": "No.7", "alive": false}, "alive": true, "round": 0, "events_digest": "sheriff1_candidates:No.1,No.10,No.11,No.2,No.7|night1_info:Last night, No.5 was eliminated", "first_speech_hash": "697959fb96b5d46e"}
+{"index": 1, "name": "No.5", "role": "guard", "init_ts": 1773135180.1118934, "role_info": {"last_guarded": "", "guarding": "No.7", "alive": false}, "alive": true, "round": 0, "events_digest": "sheriff1_candidates:No.1,No.10,No.11,No.2,No.7|night1_info:Last night, No.5 was eliminated|vote1_out:No.7", "first_speech_hash": "697959fb96b5d46e"}

space_1/history.jsonl

@@ -30,3 +30,17 @@
 {"ts": 1773136152.8488417, "event": "No.12: No.12's speech is invalid"}
 {"ts": 1773136186.6841516, "event": "No.1: I want one clear line today: resolve the Seer clash, and my vote is **No.7**.\n\nReason one: in a direct Seer duel, timing and governance matter. No.2 claimed first, gave a coherent Night 1 check on a sheriff candidate, and won the badge through public votes. No.7’s entire line is “No.2 is wolf, strip the badge now.” That can be true, but it is also the exact wolf counterclaim pattern when a fake Seer loses the badge race.\n\nReason two: several players made a timeline mistake, and I want the village to notice it. No.3, No.8, and No.9 asked No.2 or No.7 for a “second check” or “tonight’s check.” That is impossible. We have only had **one** night so far. That does not clear or condemn the Seer duel by itself, but it tells me some people are free-forming analysis without tracking the timeline.\n\nReason three: the night kill on No.5 is Tier 1 fact, but it does **not** mechanically prove either Seer. Do not overread it.\n\nSo my execution path is simple: **vote No.7 today**. If No.7 flips wolf, then players who consistently shielded that line get reviewed next. **If No.7 flips good, then No.2 is the lock tomorrow.**\n\nAnd one more thing for wolves: pushing me carelessly is not a free trade. Consolidate on **No.7**."}
 {"ts": 1773136218.7342746, "event": "No.2: First, I want to thank the village for the trust you’ve placed in me by awarding me the Sheriff badge. I understand the weight of this role, especially with a direct Seer clash on Day 1. I will lead with logic and transparency.\n\nRegarding the \"second check\" confusion mentioned by No. 3, No. 8, and No. 9: No. 1 is absolutely correct. We have only had one night. My only information is that **No. 7 is Good**. I chose to check a fellow candidate because, in a zero-info start, establishing a \"Gold Water\" player among the leaders is the most stable way to build a foundation for the village.\n\nNow, let’s look at No. 7’s reaction. As the Seer, I gave No. 7 a \"Good\" card. If No. 7 were a Villager, they should have been relieved and used that confirmed status to help me find wolves. Instead, No. 7 immediately counter-claimed Seer and labeled me a \"confirmed wolf.\" This is a classic \"Wolf-on-the-Stand\" panic. By claiming I'm a wolf, No. 7 is trying to nullify the check I performed. If I were a wolf, why would I give \"Gold Water\" to a player who hadn't even spoken yet? It would be much safer to give it to a teammate or a quiet player. Checking a vocal candidate like No. 7 and calling them good is a Seer’s move to organize the board.\n\nThe death of No. 5 is a blow to us. No. 5 was one of my earliest supporters. Wolves often kill the Sheriff's supporters to sow seeds of \"frame-up\" theories and make the village doubt the Sheriff's legitimacy. Don't fall for that complexity. The simplest expla"}
+{"ts": 1773136401.1976647, "event": "Day 1. Vote info: No.1 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136404.2574825, "event": "Day 1. Vote info: No.2 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136405.255545, "event": "Day 1. Vote info: No.3 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136406.3458452, "event": "Day 1. Vote info: No.4 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136407.3313515, "event": "Day 1. Vote info: No.6 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136408.3281984, "event": "Day 1. Vote info: No.7 voted for No.2"}
+{"ts": 1773136409.359276, "event": "Day 1. Vote info: No.8 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136410.3040605, "event": "Day 1. Vote info: No.9 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136411.2821229, "event": "Day 1. Vote info: No.10 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136412.2714708, "event": "Day 1. Vote info: No.11 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136413.3012302, "event": "Day 1. Vote info: No.12 voted for None"}
+{"ts": 1773136417.6084821, "event": "Host: Vote result: No.7."}
+{"ts": 1773136421.7570384, "event": "No.7: I am the real Seer. Last night I checked No.2he is a confirmed Werewolf. You just voted out your only information source based on a wolf's fake \"Gold Water\" claim. No.2's play was a classic \"binding\" tactic: he claimed I was good to stop me from exposing him. Look at the coordination: No.10 immediately backed No.2 before I even spoke, and No.1 led the charge to execute me. This is a massive wolf-pack victory. To the remaining good team: No.2 is 100% a wolf. No.10 and No.1 are his most likely teammates given how hard they pushed this mis-vote. If No.2 stays in power, the village loses. Use your next day to strip that badge and execute the wolf you let lead you. I urge everyone to consolidate on No.2 tomorrow. Don't let my death be in vain. Follow the logic, not the manufactured momentum. Watch who rushes to defend each other's accusation targets. Wolves protect their kills, not the village. At this point, No.2 is my clearest read. My vote goes to No.2 I think that's where this has to land."}
+{"ts": 1773136436.1617203, "event": "Host: Night falls, everyone close your eyes"}

space_1/logs/game_events.jsonl

@@ -5889,3 +5889,17 @@
 {"ts": 1773136152.848897, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "No.12: No.12's speech is invalid"}
 {"ts": 1773136186.684243, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "No.1: I want one clear line today: resolve the Seer clash, and my vote is **No.7**.\n\nReason one: in a direct Seer duel, timing and governance matter. No.2 claimed first, gave a coherent Night 1 check "}
 {"ts": 1773136218.7343516, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "No.2: First, I want to thank the village for the trust you’ve placed in me by awarding me the Sheriff badge. I understand the weight of this role, especially with a direct Seer clash on Day 1. I will "}
+{"ts": 1773136401.1977415, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "Day 1. Vote info: No.1 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136404.2575533, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "Day 1. Vote info: No.2 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136405.25559, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "Day 1. Vote info: No.3 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136406.3458922, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "Day 1. Vote info: No.4 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136407.3314068, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "Day 1. Vote info: No.6 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136408.3282542, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "Day 1. Vote info: No.7 voted for No.2"}
+{"ts": 1773136409.3593264, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "Day 1. Vote info: No.8 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136410.3041182, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "Day 1. Vote info: No.9 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136411.2821698, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "Day 1. Vote info: No.10 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136412.2715142, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "Day 1. Vote info: No.11 voted for No.7"}
+{"ts": 1773136413.3012745, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "Day 1. Vote info: No.12 voted for None"}
+{"ts": 1773136417.608521, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "Host: Vote result: No.7."}
+{"ts": 1773136421.7571094, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "No.7: I am the real Seer. Last night I checked No.2he is a confirmed Werewolf. You just voted out your only information source based on a wolf's fake \"Gold Water\" claim. No.2's play was a classic \"bin"}
+{"ts": 1773136436.1617694, "type": "history", "role": "", "status": "", "round": 0, "detail": "Host: Night falls, everyone close your eyes"}

space_1/recordings/game_20260310_093300_No_5_guard.jsonl

@@ -33,3 +33,17 @@
 {"seq": 33, "ts": 1773136152.8501806, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "No.12's speech is invalid", "name": "No.12", "status": "discuss", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.002}
 {"seq": 34, "ts": 1773136186.6858242, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "I want one clear line today: resolve the Seer clash, and my vote is **No.7**.\n\nReason one: in a direct Seer duel, timing and governance matter. No.2 claimed first, gave a coherent Night 1 check on a sheriff candidate, and won the badge through public votes. No.7’s entire line is “No.2 is wolf, strip the badge now.” That can be true, but it is also the exact wolf counterclaim pattern when a fake Seer loses the badge race.\n\nReason two: several players made a timeline mistake, and I want the village to notice it. No.3, No.8, and No.9 asked No.2 or No.7 for a “second check” or “tonight’s check.” That is impossible. We have only had **one** night so far. That does not clear or condemn the Seer duel by itself, but it tells me some people are free-forming analysis without tracking the timeline.\n\nReason three: the night kill on No.5 is Tier 1 fact, but it does **not** mechanically prove either Seer. Do not overread it.\n\nSo my execution path is simple: **vote No.7 today**. If No.7 flips wolf, then players who consistently shielded that line get reviewed next. **If No.7 flips good, then No.2 is the lock tomorrow.**\n\nAnd one more thing for wolves: pushing me carelessly is not a free trade. Consolidate on **No.7**.", "name": "No.1", "status": "discuss", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.003}
 {"seq": 35, "ts": 1773136218.7375078, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "First, I want to thank the village for the trust you’ve placed in me by awarding me the Sheriff badge. I understand the weight of this role, especially with a direct Seer clash on Day 1. I will lead with logic and transparency.\n\nRegarding the \"second check\" confusion mentioned by No. 3, No. 8, and No. 9: No. 1 is absolutely correct. We have only had one night. My only information is that **No. 7 is Good**. I chose to check a fellow candidate because, in a zero-info start, establishing a \"Gold Water\" player among the leaders is the most stable way to build a foundation for the village.\n\nNow, let’s look at No. 7’s reaction. As the Seer, I gave No. 7 a \"Good\" card. If No. 7 were a Villager, they should have been relieved and used that confirmed status to help me find wolves. Instead, No. 7 immediately counter-claimed Seer and labeled me a \"confirmed wolf.\" This is a classic \"Wolf-on-the-Stand\" panic. By claiming I'm a wolf, No. 7 is trying to nullify the check I performed. If I were a wolf, why would I give \"Gold Water\" to a player who hadn't even spoken yet? It would be much safer to give it to a teammate or a quiet player. Checking a vocal candidate like No. 7 and calling them good is a Seer’s move to organize the board.\n\nThe death of No. 5 is a blow to us. No. 5 was one of my earliest supporters. Wolves often kill the Sheriff's supporters to sow seeds of \"frame-up\" theories and make the village doubt the Sheriff's legitimacy. Don't fall for that complexity. The simplest expla", "name": "No.2", "status": "discuss", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.004}
+{"seq": 36, "ts": 1773136401.2000837, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "No.7", "name": "No.1", "status": "vote", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.004}
+{"seq": 37, "ts": 1773136404.259118, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "No.7", "name": "No.2", "status": "vote", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.002}
+{"seq": 38, "ts": 1773136405.2569437, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "No.7", "name": "No.3", "status": "vote", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.002}
+{"seq": 39, "ts": 1773136406.347199, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "No.7", "name": "No.4", "status": "vote", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.002}
+{"seq": 40, "ts": 1773136407.3329575, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "No.7", "name": "No.6", "status": "vote", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.002}
+{"seq": 41, "ts": 1773136408.3297584, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "No.2", "name": "No.7", "status": "vote", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.002}
+{"seq": 42, "ts": 1773136409.3606546, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "No.7", "name": "No.8", "status": "vote", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.002}
+{"seq": 43, "ts": 1773136410.3053317, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "No.7", "name": "No.9", "status": "vote", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.002}
+{"seq": 44, "ts": 1773136411.2834291, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "No.7", "name": "No.10", "status": "vote", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.002}
+{"seq": 45, "ts": 1773136412.2734993, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "No.7", "name": "No.11", "status": "vote", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.003}
+{"seq": 46, "ts": 1773136413.3027027, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": null, "name": "No.12", "status": "vote", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.002}
+{"seq": 47, "ts": 1773136417.6098094, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "Voting results: No.7 was voted out", "name": "No.7", "status": "vote_result", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.003}
+{"seq": 48, "ts": 1773136421.7599661, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": "I am the real Seer. Last night I checked No.2he is a confirmed Werewolf. You just voted out your only information source based on a wolf's fake \"Gold Water\" claim. No.2's play was a classic \"binding\" tactic: he claimed I was good to stop me from exposing him. Look at the coordination: No.10 immediately backed No.2 before I even spoke, and No.1 led the charge to execute me. This is a massive wolf-pack victory. To the remaining good team: No.2 is 100% a wolf. No.10 and No.1 are his most likely teammates given how hard they pushed this mis-vote. If No.2 stays in power, the village loses. Use your next day to strip that badge and execute the wolf you let lead you. I urge everyone to consolidate on No.2 tomorrow. Don't let my death be in vain. Follow the logic, not the manufactured momentum. Watch who rushes to defend each other's accusation targets. Wolves protect their kills, not the village. At this point, No.2 is my clearest read. My vote goes to No.2 I think that's where this has to land.", "name": "No.7", "status": "discuss", "word": null, "round": 1, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.004}
+{"seq": 49, "ts": 1773136436.163287, "endpoint": "perceive", "request": {"message": null, "name": null, "status": "night", "word": null, "round": 2, "role": "guard"}, "response": {"success": true, "result": null, "skillTargetPlayer": null, "errMsg": null}, "elapsed_s": 0.002}