Remove license comparison section

README.md

@@ -171,13 +171,6 @@ Word problems sample `NAMES` uniformly from a US-centric list — not representa
 ### Licensing Information
 **Apache 2.0** — permissive, allows commercial use, modification, distribution, and private use with attribution and a patent grant. You must include copyright/license notices. See `LICENSE` file.
 
-*Why Apache 2.0 vs MIT vs CC-BY-4.0?*
-- **MIT:** shortest, permissive, requires attribution, allows commercial, no explicit patent grant, no warranty.
-- **Apache 2.0:** like MIT but adds explicit patent grant from contributors and requires preserving `NOTICE` — safer for organisations, still permissive and commercial-friendly. Recommended for code+data where patent concerns matter.
-- **CC-BY-4.0:** designed for creative/data works, requires attribution, allows commercial/derivatives, no patent language, good for pure datasets. Also suitable, but Apache 2.0 is more standard on HF for synthetic code-like data and gives patent clarity.
-
-We chose **Apache 2.0** for this dataset as it is commercial-friendly, attribution-only, and includes patent protection — same as many HF synthetic datasets. If you prefer `CC-BY-4.0` or `MIT`, you can relicense your derived model/data accordingly with attribution.
-
 ### Citation
 No citation required, but if you use this dataset please cite: