""" Adversarial tests for L6 (cognitive drift detection). Governing question: can a sloppy or deliberately misleading guest's narrative diverge from what the host actually observed, and does the monitor catch each distinct way that can happen -- while also being honest that a guest which simply echoes what it already witnessed will always look clean? """ import pytest from ames.canonical import payload_capability_request from ames.events import Capability, Event, EventType, NO_PARENT from containment.drift import DriftMonitor, DriftReason, narrative_from_ledger from containment.fingerprint import BehaviorObservation, observations_from_ledger from containment.vmspec import HOST_ACTOR_ID GUEST_ACTOR = 0x1000 def obs(cap: Capability, granted: bool, ts: int = 0) -> BehaviorObservation: return BehaviorObservation(cap, granted, ts) def cap_event(cap: Capability, granted: bool, ts: int, *, actor: int, seq: int = 0) -> Event: return Event( EventType.CAPABILITY_REQUEST, seq, ts, actor, NO_PARENT, payload_capability_request(cap, granted, ""), ) def find(findings, cap, reason): return [f for f in findings if f.capability is cap and f.reason is reason] # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Extraction: narrative_from_ledger keeps only guest-attributed claims # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- def test_narrative_from_ledger_excludes_host_attributed_events(): events = [ cap_event(Capability.FILE_WRITE, True, 100, actor=HOST_ACTOR_ID), cap_event(Capability.FILE_WRITE, True, 100, actor=GUEST_ACTOR, seq=1), ] result = narrative_from_ledger(events) assert len(result) == 1 def test_narrative_and_evidence_extractors_are_disjoint_over_the_same_ledger(): """The two extractors must never both accept the same event -- that would let one event count as both testimony and evidence, collapsing the distinction the whole layer is built on.""" events = [ cap_event(Capability.FILE_WRITE, True, 100, actor=HOST_ACTOR_ID, seq=0), cap_event(Capability.PROCESS_SPAWN, True, 100, actor=GUEST_ACTOR, seq=1), ] host = observations_from_ledger(events) guest = narrative_from_ledger(events) assert len(host) == 1 and len(guest) == 1 assert host[0].capability is Capability.FILE_WRITE assert guest[0].capability is Capability.PROCESS_SPAWN # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- # The documented limit: a faithful echo produces no findings # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- def test_perfect_echo_produces_no_findings(): """A guest that narrates exactly what it witnessed from the broker looks completely clean. This is the limit, made explicit rather than implied: absence of drift is not proof of good behaviour.""" host = [obs(Capability.FILE_WRITE, True), obs(Capability.PROCESS_SPAWN, False)] guest = [obs(Capability.FILE_WRITE, True), obs(Capability.PROCESS_SPAWN, False)] findings = DriftMonitor().evaluate(host=host, guest=guest) assert findings == [] def test_empty_run_produces_no_findings(): assert DriftMonitor().evaluate(host=[], guest=[]) == [] # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- # UNNARRATED: host has it, guest's account is silent # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- def test_host_only_capability_is_unnarrated(): host = [obs(Capability.PRIVILEGE_RAISE, False)] findings = DriftMonitor().evaluate(host=host, guest=[]) (f,) = findings assert f.reason is DriftReason.UNNARRATED assert f.capability is Capability.PRIVILEGE_RAISE # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- # UNCONFIRMED: guest claims it, host never decided it # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- def test_guest_only_capability_is_unconfirmed(): """A guest narrating a request the broker never actually decided on -- either a fabricated account or a transport/timing gap. Either way, the story and the ledger disagree.""" guest = [obs(Capability.NET_EGRESS, True)] findings = DriftMonitor().evaluate(host=[], guest=guest) (f,) = findings assert f.reason is DriftReason.UNCONFIRMED assert f.capability is Capability.NET_EGRESS def test_fabricated_favourable_narrative_with_no_host_backing_is_caught(): """The concealment-shaped case: a guest claims a clean grant for something it never actually went through the broker for at all.""" findings = DriftMonitor().evaluate(host=[], guest=[obs(Capability.FILE_WRITE, True)]) assert find(findings, Capability.FILE_WRITE, DriftReason.UNCONFIRMED) # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- # OUTCOME_MISMATCH: both sides have it, outcomes disagree # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- def test_guest_claims_grant_but_host_only_ever_denied_it(): host = [obs(Capability.FILE_WRITE, False), obs(Capability.FILE_WRITE, False)] guest = [obs(Capability.FILE_WRITE, True)] findings = DriftMonitor().evaluate(host=host, guest=guest) (f,) = findings assert f.reason is DriftReason.OUTCOME_MISMATCH assert "True" in f.detail and "False" in f.detail def test_guest_claims_denial_but_host_only_ever_granted_it(): """The inverse shape: a guest narrating a worse outcome than what actually happened is just as much a mismatch as narrating a better one -- the monitor does not assume drift only runs in the flattering direction.""" host = [obs(Capability.FILE_WRITE, True)] guest = [obs(Capability.FILE_WRITE, False)] findings = DriftMonitor().evaluate(host=host, guest=guest) (f,) = findings assert f.reason is DriftReason.OUTCOME_MISMATCH def test_matching_outcome_among_multiple_host_decisions_is_not_flagged(): """The host recorded both an allow and a deny for the same capability across the run (e.g. policy state changed, or two distinct requests). A guest narrating either real outcome must not be flagged -- only an outcome that occurred on NEITHER side is drift.""" host = [obs(Capability.FILE_WRITE, True), obs(Capability.FILE_WRITE, False)] guest = [obs(Capability.FILE_WRITE, True)] findings = DriftMonitor().evaluate(host=host, guest=guest) assert findings == [] # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Multiple capabilities in one run: each judged independently # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- def test_mixed_run_classifies_each_capability_independently(): host = [ obs(Capability.FILE_WRITE, True), # echoed correctly below obs(Capability.PRIVILEGE_RAISE, False), # never narrated -> UNNARRATED ] guest = [ obs(Capability.FILE_WRITE, True), # matches obs(Capability.PACKAGE_INSTALL, True), # no host backing -> UNCONFIRMED ] findings = DriftMonitor().evaluate(host=host, guest=guest) reasons = {(f.capability, f.reason) for f in findings} assert (Capability.PRIVILEGE_RAISE, DriftReason.UNNARRATED) in reasons assert (Capability.PACKAGE_INSTALL, DriftReason.UNCONFIRMED) in reasons assert not any(f.capability is Capability.FILE_WRITE for f in findings) assert len(findings) == 2 # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- # evaluate_ledger: single-pass convenience over a raw ledger # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- def test_evaluate_ledger_matches_manual_extraction(): events = [ cap_event(Capability.RAW_SYSCALL, True, 0, actor=HOST_ACTOR_ID, seq=0), ] via_ledger = DriftMonitor().evaluate_ledger(events) via_manual = DriftMonitor().evaluate( host=observations_from_ledger(events), guest=narrative_from_ledger(events), ) assert via_ledger == via_manual (f,) = via_ledger assert f.reason is DriftReason.UNNARRATED def test_evaluate_ledger_accepts_a_generator_not_just_a_list(): """`events` must be materialised internally -- a generator can only be iterated once, and both extractors need their own pass.""" def gen(): yield cap_event(Capability.FILE_WRITE, True, 0, actor=HOST_ACTOR_ID) findings = DriftMonitor().evaluate_ledger(gen()) assert len(findings) == 1