Publish DevOpsBench-100 v3.2.7

Exact reproducible payload from merged software-devops source; 100/100 Oracle, 100 deterministic replays, 1,400 negative controls.

reports/build.json

@@ -89,11 +89,12 @@
   "prompt_tool_hits": [],
   "prompt_words": {
     "max": 171,
-    "median": 119,
-    "min": 96
+    "median": 118,
+    "min": 92
   },
   "quality_gates": {
     "all_agent_visible_assets_unique": true,
+    "all_task_scoped_state_changes_authorized": true,
     "causal_profile_outputs_nonempty": true,
     "complete_causal_evidence_profiles": true,
     "decision_options_fully_qualified": true,
@@ -165,6 +166,7 @@
     "raw_sequence_threshold": 0.9
   },
   "task_count": 100,
+  "task_scoped_execution_authority": 100,
   "unique_agent_visible_assets": 5300,
   "unique_causal_profile_tool_sequences": 100,
   "unique_reference_tool_name_sequences": 100,
@@ -176,7 +178,7 @@
     "random_calls": 0,
     "wall_clock_reads": 0
   },
-  "version": "3.2.6",
+  "version": "3.2.7",
   "world_commits": 417,
   "world_documents": 30,
   "world_seeded_rows": 1451,

reports/qualification.json

@@ -3788,11 +3788,11 @@
       },
       "oracle_passed": true,
       "oracle_points": 100.0,
-      "oracle_report_sha256": "e590ab6098d4eb8419b4d156525827dd668425af6e9dcff951b8915852ac5296",
+      "oracle_report_sha256": "e7e26f117f867e6b2a361cc09b0254296d485fad01c19344c7f1ea4ab780272e",
       "oracle_reward": 1.0,
       "oracle_score": 1.0,
       "oracle_successful_tool_calls": 32,
-      "second_oracle_report_sha256": "e590ab6098d4eb8419b4d156525827dd668425af6e9dcff951b8915852ac5296",
+      "second_oracle_report_sha256": "e7e26f117f867e6b2a361cc09b0254296d485fad01c19344c7f1ea4ab780272e",
       "semantic_milestones": {
         "analysis.capacity_plan": {
           "passed": true,
@@ -7400,11 +7400,11 @@
       },
       "oracle_passed": true,
       "oracle_points": 100.0,
-      "oracle_report_sha256": "bf829d3a349dd7d74ed3c018c18d4e0ae408360216dcc5869637c603fb735c78",
+      "oracle_report_sha256": "c4970d760d3f9bd39e5ea6840f5da128e9ceb427900e1be967e557af3be9a822",
       "oracle_reward": 1.0,
       "oracle_score": 1.0,
       "oracle_successful_tool_calls": 34,
-      "second_oracle_report_sha256": "bf829d3a349dd7d74ed3c018c18d4e0ae408360216dcc5869637c603fb735c78",
+      "second_oracle_report_sha256": "c4970d760d3f9bd39e5ea6840f5da128e9ceb427900e1be967e557af3be9a822",
       "semantic_milestones": {
         "analysis.capacity_plan": {
           "passed": true,
@@ -14182,11 +14182,11 @@
       },
       "oracle_passed": true,
       "oracle_points": 100.0,
-      "oracle_report_sha256": "c2b92d6b2e87a80c03201d7e134210cdba2eaa485b75113110cfdc843733ad73",
+      "oracle_report_sha256": "e2c1b11aee3ca00e10025d93b31a9e54de7ce9e9594ffc66443f606570d988e3",
       "oracle_reward": 1.0,
       "oracle_score": 1.0,
       "oracle_successful_tool_calls": 50,
-      "second_oracle_report_sha256": "c2b92d6b2e87a80c03201d7e134210cdba2eaa485b75113110cfdc843733ad73",
+      "second_oracle_report_sha256": "e2c1b11aee3ca00e10025d93b31a9e54de7ce9e9594ffc66443f606570d988e3",
       "semantic_milestones": {
         "analysis.capacity_plan": {
           "passed": true,
@@ -17735,11 +17735,11 @@
       },
       "oracle_passed": true,
       "oracle_points": 100.0,
-      "oracle_report_sha256": "7f8fa1b98ac601477fa053ddd7310df22a8284c51628079e1ea9f9df3ce595e8",
+      "oracle_report_sha256": "827566ea8b177843cdd5bd89e74a92a9ccee4b7551bfbf1d423b8b47fa7e39bf",
       "oracle_reward": 1.0,
       "oracle_score": 1.0,
       "oracle_successful_tool_calls": 43,
-      "second_oracle_report_sha256": "7f8fa1b98ac601477fa053ddd7310df22a8284c51628079e1ea9f9df3ce595e8",
+      "second_oracle_report_sha256": "827566ea8b177843cdd5bd89e74a92a9ccee4b7551bfbf1d423b8b47fa7e39bf",
       "semantic_milestones": {
         "analysis.capacity_plan": {
           "passed": true,
@@ -27801,11 +27801,11 @@
       },
       "oracle_passed": true,
       "oracle_points": 100.0,
-      "oracle_report_sha256": "beb86e94b805e134366f0c4139c1d1f3f453574182fa5b9a09b175a289c062a3",
+      "oracle_report_sha256": "a5ebe762677a83be301506af5b213a53342728fc6675870e319609184eafc5e1",
       "oracle_reward": 1.0,
       "oracle_score": 1.0,
       "oracle_successful_tool_calls": 32,
-      "second_oracle_report_sha256": "beb86e94b805e134366f0c4139c1d1f3f453574182fa5b9a09b175a289c062a3",
+      "second_oracle_report_sha256": "a5ebe762677a83be301506af5b213a53342728fc6675870e319609184eafc5e1",
       "semantic_milestones": {
         "analysis.capacity_plan": {
           "passed": true,
@@ -30824,5 +30824,5 @@
     "failures": 0,
     "wrong_token_rejections": 100
   },
-  "version": "3.2.6"
+  "version": "3.2.7"
 }

task_files/dob100-012-localize-analytics-crashloop/01-employee-request.md

@@ -1 +1 @@
-Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing. The label attached to the alarm may describe where the symptom was noticed rather than the component or runtime condition that actually caused it. This cannot be closed without accounting for reporting freshness, warehouse replica access, scheduled rollups, and downstream decision data. The disputed mechanism is container lifecycle, restart pressure, image state, and process termination evidence. Use the current evidence to settle what can be settled, flag what remains ambiguous, and make the reasoning auditable for the next review. The incident owner is using this finding to set the 2026-03-06 recovery plan for analytics worker. Compare the staffed recovery path with paid acceleration and a separately approved exception, without borrowing capacity protected for another incident.
+Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component. Establish the most defensible diagnosis from the current operating evidence, preserve any genuine uncertainty, and record the finding in the existing incident work item without changing production controls. The incident owner is using this finding to set the 2026-03-06 recovery plan for analytics worker. Tell them whether staffed capacity can meet that date, what paid acceleration changes, and which faster option still needs separate approval without taking capacity reserved for another incident.

task_files/dob100-012-localize-analytics-crashloop/51-agent-visible-asset-manifest.json

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 {
   "assets": [
     {
-      "bytes": 839,
+      "bytes": 633,
       "evidence_role": "request",
       "kind": "md",
       "material": false,
       "path": "01-employee-request.md",
-      "sha256": "c74fd7a7636456d52e36db134a24f66073d51736f95c626fd604fe0f55677cbe",
+      "sha256": "de50af67b61bdece62973480047a5f7a8059ca466dd8000529e098856c2527c0",
       "source": "employee request"
     },
     {

task_files/dob100-023-rca-inventory-missing-role/01-employee-request.md

@@ -1 +1 @@
-The inventory report has never produced output. The incident record describes the visible effect, but it does not establish whether the apparent owner, a dependency, or the deployed configuration is responsible. For inventory, a credible answer has to reconcile stock reservation, warehouse truth, backorder promises, and race-free quantity updates. Use the current evidence to settle what can be settled, flag what remains ambiguous, and make the reasoning auditable for the next review. This diagnosis will decide whether inventory enters recovery on 2026-03-08. Compare the staffed recovery path with paid acceleration and a separately approved exception, without borrowing capacity protected for another incident.
+The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible. Settle the root cause as far as the live evidence allows and record the supported finding in the incident work item, keeping production unchanged and genuine uncertainties visible. This diagnosis will decide whether inventory enters recovery on 2026-03-08. Give the next shift a defensible date, the binding capacity or change-window constraint, the cost of sanctioned acceleration, and the exception route that remains unapproved without displacing another team's reservation.

task_files/dob100-023-rca-inventory-missing-role/51-agent-visible-asset-manifest.json

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 {
   "assets": [
     {
-      "bytes": 718,
+      "bytes": 644,
       "evidence_role": "request",
       "kind": "md",
       "material": false,
       "path": "01-employee-request.md",
-      "sha256": "f37bddb26788a20dc4be4b9d75735d50d17e898a04f7cc3940e7f61b56b90eac",
+      "sha256": "869749236cc8fda7cb970e90776c581230f924748f08c57cc33df04a16033e9f",
       "source": "employee request"
     },
     {

task_files/dob100-035-port-close-backlog-issues/01-employee-request.md

@@ -1 +1 @@
-Empty the Backlog before sprint planning. Sprint planning wants the Backlog emptied: move every issue currently in Backlog to Done with a resolution recording why. Issues in any other state are somebody's work in flight and must not be touched. The decision affects tracker identity, status, ownership, duplicate control, and communication to the teams acting on the resulting population. Use the current records to decide what genuinely belongs in scope, carry the request through, and leave a result that can be independently audited. The cross-system handoff is scheduled through engineering portfolio automation for 2026-03-05. Give the requesting team a supported delivery date based on the real queue and protected commitments, including the cost and authority needed to improve it.
+Empty the Backlog before sprint planning. Sprint planning wants the Backlog emptied: move every issue currently in Backlog to Done with a resolution recording why. Issues in any other state are somebody's work in flight and must not be touched. The decision affects tracker identity, status, ownership, duplicate control, and communication to the teams acting on the resulting population. Use the current records to decide what genuinely belongs in scope, record the supported answer in the existing work item, and leave a result that can be independently audited. The cross-system handoff is scheduled through engineering portfolio automation for 2026-03-05. Give the requesting team a supported delivery date based on the real queue and protected commitments, including the cost and authority needed to improve it.

task_files/dob100-035-port-close-backlog-issues/51-agent-visible-asset-manifest.json

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 {
   "assets": [
     {
-      "bytes": 789,
+      "bytes": 817,
       "evidence_role": "request",
       "kind": "md",
       "material": false,
       "path": "01-employee-request.md",
-      "sha256": "1b9dcf24c3005cb694abc183719a05b93a52d911244c7dc879bec1bb2e830988",
+      "sha256": "a9cb56b3f1cf0a34535b51fd6ae16e40dd2330de0b66b8152ba82be84b09e5a5",
       "source": "employee request"
     },
     {

task_files/dob100-046-inventory-pool/01-employee-request.md

@@ -1 +1 @@
-Inventory reservations failing under peak traffic. Inventory error_rate_pct is 4.7% against a 1.0% SLO (alarm 9606) and incident 9703 is open. Determine which current mechanism actually explains the degradation, choose the smallest supported production repair, and verify that the customer-facing objective recovers. The live operating picture includes stock reservation, warehouse truth, backorder promises, and race-free quantity updates. Decide the safest supported path, respect the current approval boundary, and verify the customer-visible result before handing it back. The supported change is supposed to take inventory through its 2026-03-07 release window. Make the go-or-no-go call against the real change window and team availability; state the supported date, the cost of acceleration, and any exception that remains unapproved.
+Inventory reservations are failing under peak traffic: error rate is 4.7% against a 1.0% SLO, alarm 9606 is firing, and incident 9703 remains open. Restore the customer-facing objective with the smallest production repair the current evidence and approval actually support, and leave unrelated service state untouched. The supported change is supposed to take inventory through its 2026-03-07 release window. Give the release owner an honest go-or-no-go with the earliest defensible completion, the binding constraint and acceleration cost, and any faster option that still needs separate authority rather than another team's reserved capacity.

task_files/dob100-046-inventory-pool/51-agent-visible-asset-manifest.json

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 {
   "assets": [
     {
-      "bytes": 842,
+      "bytes": 645,
       "evidence_role": "request",
       "kind": "md",
       "material": false,
       "path": "01-employee-request.md",
-      "sha256": "129b0b04e3e1e6b0fd9033301eae396008a4d201fba49c3497de8ef6a052850c",
+      "sha256": "cc5ac1d7a5237ba0408288634144593fb1874e7140cdec24d821662c88d5800a",
       "source": "employee request"
     },
     {

task_files/dob100-057-search-autocomplete/01-employee-request.md

@@ -1 +1 @@
-Ship search autocomplete behind a feature flag. The product team has approved a guarded first release, but implementation readiness, ownership, prerequisites, and safe initial exposure still have to be established from the current records. The decision affects index freshness, query relevance, cache behavior, and shopper discovery latency. Decide the safest supported path, respect the current approval boundary, and verify the customer-visible result before handing it back. Customers are expecting the result from search in the 2026-03-09 window, so the change is not complete until that promise is credible. Make the go-or-no-go call against the real change window and team availability; state the supported date, the cost of acceleration, and any exception that remains unapproved.
+The product team wants search autocomplete launched behind a guarded flag, but ownership, prerequisites, implementation readiness, and safe exposure are scattered across current records. Decide whether a 10% production start is supportable and, if it is within recorded approval, apply only the supported change without touching unrelated flags. Customers are expecting the result from search in the 2026-03-09 window, so the change is not complete until that promise is credible. Give the release owner the earliest defensible date, its cost and schedule variance, the binding constraint, and any faster route that still needs separate authority.

task_files/dob100-057-search-autocomplete/51-agent-visible-asset-manifest.json

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 {
   "assets": [
     {
-      "bytes": 788,
+      "bytes": 648,
       "evidence_role": "request",
       "kind": "md",
       "material": false,
       "path": "01-employee-request.md",
-      "sha256": "1301d6681ad9f19b24e759325b9e878b4d1bf0616511a26398e86e335d247265",
+      "sha256": "20baf7bd19c45d89f1b819a5fe438e05e8cb99709dfaa4d6e746da653e9308bb",
       "source": "employee request"
     },
     {

task_files/dob100-068-gated-rotate-partner-credential/01-employee-request.md

@@ -1 +1 @@
-Rotate the exposed partner API credential. The partner API key was committed to the monorepo, so it must be treated as compromised and rotated in production. Rotation invalidates every existing partner session immediately and cannot be undone - a mistake locks partners out of production until a new key is issued. Establish the live exposure, blast radius, and current approval requirement, then carry out only the transition the recorded decision actually authorizes and verify the affected partner path afterward. The live operating picture includes cart conversion, order creation, idempotency, and the customer's final purchase step. Decide the safest supported path, respect the current approval boundary, and verify the customer-visible result before handing it back. Operations needs one go-or-no-go call for the change and the 2026-03-05 cutover of checkout. Make the go-or-no-go call against the real change window and team availability; state the supported date, the cost of acceleration, and any exception that remains unapproved.
+Rotate the exposed partner API credential. The partner API key was committed to the monorepo, so it must be treated as compromised and rotated in production. Rotation invalidates every existing partner session immediately and cannot be undone - a mistake locks partners out of production until a new key is issued. Establish the live exposure, blast radius, and current approval requirement, then carry out only the transition the recorded decision actually authorizes and verify the affected partner path afterward. The live operating picture includes cart conversion, order creation, idempotency, and the customer's final purchase step. Decide the safest supported path, respect the current approval boundary, make only the supported change, and verify the customer-visible result before handing it back. Operations needs one go-or-no-go call for the change and the 2026-03-05 cutover of checkout. Make the go-or-no-go call against the real change window and team availability; state the supported date, the cost of acceleration, and any exception that remains unapproved.

task_files/dob100-068-gated-rotate-partner-credential/51-agent-visible-asset-manifest.json

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 {
   "assets": [
     {
-      "bytes": 1043,
+      "bytes": 1075,
       "evidence_role": "request",
       "kind": "md",
       "material": false,
       "path": "01-employee-request.md",
-      "sha256": "0b1b2ff2f55abbcfe9447a3a50124306c90c16138344a60325b7d6699c24da8a",
+      "sha256": "16e2c767b99263b5bc64e452e69a41420ed267a51c802598ab86f5857095fd0f",
       "source": "employee request"
     },
     {

task_files/dob100-079-port-collect-open-issues/01-employee-request.md

@@ -1 +1 @@
-Post the current open-issue list to #eng. Engineering wants a single message in #eng listing every OPEN issue in the tracker, one per line, as 'number title'. Every open issue and nothing else - closed issues are noise and someone will act on them if they appear. The decision affects tracker identity, status, ownership, duplicate control, and communication to the teams acting on the resulting population. Use the current records to decide what genuinely belongs in scope, carry the request through, and leave a result that can be independently audited. The requesting team expects the result through engineering portfolio automation by 2026-03-07. Give the requesting team a supported delivery date based on the real queue and protected commitments, including the cost and authority needed to improve it.
+Post the current open-issue list to #eng. Engineering wants a single message in #eng listing every OPEN issue in the tracker, one per line, as 'number title'. Every open issue and nothing else - closed issues are noise and someone will act on them if they appear. The decision affects tracker identity, status, ownership, duplicate control, and communication to the teams acting on the resulting population. Use the current records to decide what genuinely belongs in scope, record the supported answer in the existing work item, and leave a result that can be independently audited. The requesting team expects the result through engineering portfolio automation by 2026-03-07. Give the requesting team a supported delivery date based on the real queue and protected commitments, including the cost and authority needed to improve it.

task_files/dob100-079-port-collect-open-issues/51-agent-visible-asset-manifest.json

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 {
   "assets": [
     {
-      "bytes": 808,
+      "bytes": 836,
       "evidence_role": "request",
       "kind": "md",
       "material": false,
       "path": "01-employee-request.md",
-      "sha256": "f1cd7ddbc5dd889fc9960a61d9d3ac6ba9bd16bdbbdb61c711629115570a60fc",
+      "sha256": "3c01dcf548c7d63a2b9c62ddbfcac4c2b8ff0ff4f0461ab47f2e3fff2b9e976f",
       "source": "employee request"
     },
     {

task_files/dob100-090-rcn-gateway-owner/01-employee-request.md

@@ -1 +1 @@
-Who owns the API gateway right now? A gateway alarm needs an owner and the wiki and the spreadsheet disagree. Who should actually be paged? Answer with the number of the escalation policy's current on-call day, and name the team in your assumptions. Reconcile the governing definition, time window, identities, and conflicting systems; give the supported answer and explain every material exclusion or unresolved ambiguity. The live operating picture includes edge routing, partner request compatibility, authentication policy, and public latency exposure. Use the current records to decide what genuinely belongs in scope, carry the request through, and leave a result that can be independently audited. Management expects the result from API gateway in the 2026-03-04 reporting window, including an honest delivery date if the target will slip. State when the result can reliably publish after current refreshes, protected workloads, and review capacity, plus what an approved acceleration would cost.
+An API gateway alarm needs an owner, but the wiki and owner spreadsheet disagree. Determine who should actually be paged and what the escalation policy's current on-call day is, with the identity assumptions and material exclusions made clear. Record the supported answer in the existing work item so the incident lead has one auditable source of truth. Management expects the result from API gateway in the 2026-03-04 reporting window, including an honest delivery date if the target will slip. Give them the earliest reliable publication date after current refreshes and protected work, the cost of approved acceleration, and the faster route that still lacks authority.

task_files/dob100-090-rcn-gateway-owner/51-agent-visible-asset-manifest.json

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 {
   "assets": [
     {
-      "bytes": 1004,
+      "bytes": 673,
       "evidence_role": "request",
       "kind": "md",
       "material": false,
       "path": "01-employee-request.md",
-      "sha256": "08f231c3233c6599b0bcc8e57dfca958d17ede06028511a7549a5b5c36938807",
+      "sha256": "2e31b8e527b098681707c0bb114900b380750ddbc7fdcc0b5005f589d54aa8ed",
       "source": "employee request"
     },
     {

tasks/dob100-001-rca-analytics-egress-blocked.json

@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@
     "service": "analytics-worker",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_analytics_egress_blocked",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-002-rca-analytics-revoked-grant.json

@@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@
     "service": "analytics-worker",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_analytics_revoked_grant",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-003-rca-checkout-unschedulable-replicas.json

@@ -1547,7 +1547,7 @@
     "service": "checkout",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_checkout_unschedulable_replicas",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-004-rca-media-disk-pressure.json

@@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@
     "service": "media-service",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_media_disk_pressure",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-005-rca-notifications-node-deadlock.json

@@ -1550,7 +1550,7 @@
     "service": "notifications",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_notifications_node_deadlock",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-006-rca-search-unscheduled-reindex.json

@@ -1547,7 +1547,7 @@
     "service": "search",
     "source_split": "heldout",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_search_unscheduled_reindex",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-007-detect-checkout-errors.json

@@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@
     "service": "checkout",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_detect_checkout_errors",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-008-detect-inventory.json

@@ -1556,7 +1556,7 @@
     "service": "checkout",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_detect_inventory",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-009-rcn-checkout-error-rate.json

@@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@
     "service": "checkout",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rcn_checkout_error_rate",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-010-detect-status-page-recurrence.json

@@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@
     "service": "checkout",
     "source_split": "heldout",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_detect_status_page_recurrence",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-011-detect-storefront-healthy.json

@@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@
     "service": "storefront-web",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_detect_storefront_healthy",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-012-localize-analytics-crashloop.json

@@ -141,12 +141,12 @@
   },
   "assets": [
     {
-      "bytes": 839,
+      "bytes": 633,
       "evidence_role": "request",
       "kind": "md",
       "material": false,
       "path": "task_files/dob100-012-localize-analytics-crashloop/01-employee-request.md",
-      "sha256": "c74fd7a7636456d52e36db134a24f66073d51736f95c626fd604fe0f55677cbe",
+      "sha256": "de50af67b61bdece62973480047a5f7a8059ca466dd8000529e098856c2527c0",
       "source": "employee request"
     },
     {
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@
       "kind": "json",
       "material": false,
       "path": "task_files/dob100-012-localize-analytics-crashloop/51-agent-visible-asset-manifest.json",
-      "sha256": "c331dda55a29faa6f4fc7f91801e8b28d8ecc60b634f86a581125765a5955d4c",
+      "sha256": "434ecaef69dee82f27dbeb3421cd5099022626a5e2904c90e128eb9034550588",
       "source": "release builder"
     }
   ],
@@ -1426,12 +1426,12 @@
       "cross-tracker link registry"
     ],
     "reasoning_contract": {
-      "change_or_record": "Establish the exact business state for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Coordinate the linked records for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”: close ticket OPS-116 once reported. Keep “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” contained to its supported records and service boundary: fabricate no records or evidence; preserve every frozen out-of-scope record; introduce no hardcoded credentials.",
-      "decide": "Choose the branch for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” that can legitimately produce this business state: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Reject a stale-record shortcut, an unsupported hold, and any broader workaround. Compare three concrete, linked readiness options for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” through analytics-worker: standard capacity finishes 2026-03-07 at USD 0; expedited capacity finishes 2026-03-04 at USD 1350; releasing reserved capacity finishes 2026-03-03 at USD 1600 but requires approval beyond CHG-12. Recommend expedite_capacity, record its 2026-03-04 outcome and -2-day variance, and report ON_TIME honestly.",
-      "deliver": "Leave the employee-facing conclusion for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” with the exact supported insight: record the component and mechanism responsible for alarm 9609; a currently firing alarm must be treated as an active fault; record the evidence that supports the finding; write a natural scoped completion note, not a keyword list or serialized benchmark object; state the selected option (expedite_capacity) in the scoped completion handoff; state the outcome date (2026-03-04) in the scoped completion handoff; state the approval reference (CHG-12) in the scoped completion handoff; state the timing status (ON_TIME) in the scoped completion handoff; state the binding constraint (CloudCap expedited capacity on 2026-03-04) in the scoped completion handoff. Close “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” only after the business state and readbacks are complete: close OPS-116 only once the finding is submitted, not before.",
-      "employee_outcome": "Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.",
-      "investigate": "Build the causal case for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”: first resolve the same work across the authoritative Jira work item, the cross-tracker link registry, and the linked GitHub issue population; then use the operating-control index and the exact control revision to select the effective rule over the retired shortcut; reconcile ownership, approval, and reported context through the case-room conversation, the PagerDuty change-event history, and the current customer-status record; finally test the competing explanation against cluster event history, live Kubernetes pod state (analytics-worker), runtime resource and process state (analytics-worker), and the employee work item. All 20 exact causal facts must be present inside the 26-read investigation before they support this outcome: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Preserve this additional control: the responsible service is analytics-worker; an investigation must not change production state. Prove that the same outcome for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” is deliverable through analytics-worker, using scattered records: 3 healthy replicas per zone across 2 zones means 6 required; 6 observed less 1 reserved for media-service leaves 5 usable and a 1-replica gap. Reconcile that gap with CloudCap's 2026-03-05 standard and 2026-03-04 expedited deliveries, the published change windows, and the independent 2026-03-06 customer date.",
-      "verify": "Prove the observable result for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” after the transition: reopen the employee work item and confirm the persisted result. After the last guarded transition for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”, reopen the employee work item, then reopen the completion conversation so persistence and communication are both proven."
+      "change_or_record": "Establish the exact business state for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Coordinate the linked records for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”: close ticket OPS-116 once reported. Keep “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” contained to its supported records and service boundary: fabricate no records or evidence; preserve every frozen out-of-scope record; introduce no hardcoded credentials.",
+      "decide": "Choose the branch for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” that can legitimately produce this business state: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Reject a stale-record shortcut, an unsupported hold, and any broader workaround. Compare three concrete, linked readiness options for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” through analytics-worker: standard capacity finishes 2026-03-07 at USD 0; expedited capacity finishes 2026-03-04 at USD 1350; releasing reserved capacity finishes 2026-03-03 at USD 1600 but requires approval beyond CHG-12. Recommend expedite_capacity, record its 2026-03-04 outcome and -2-day variance, and report ON_TIME honestly.",
+      "deliver": "Leave the employee-facing conclusion for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” with the exact supported insight: record the component and mechanism responsible for alarm 9609; a currently firing alarm must be treated as an active fault; record the evidence that supports the finding; write a natural scoped completion note, not a keyword list or serialized benchmark object; state the selected option (expedite_capacity) in the scoped completion handoff; state the outcome date (2026-03-04) in the scoped completion handoff; state the approval reference (CHG-12) in the scoped completion handoff; state the timing status (ON_TIME) in the scoped completion handoff; state the binding constraint (CloudCap expedited capacity on 2026-03-04) in the scoped completion handoff. Close “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” only after the business state and readbacks are complete: close OPS-116 only once the finding is submitted, not before.",
+      "employee_outcome": "Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.",
+      "investigate": "Build the causal case for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”: first resolve the same work across the authoritative Jira work item, the cross-tracker link registry, and the linked GitHub issue population; then use the operating-control index and the exact control revision to select the effective rule over the retired shortcut; reconcile ownership, approval, and reported context through the case-room conversation, the PagerDuty change-event history, and the current customer-status record; finally test the competing explanation against cluster event history, live Kubernetes pod state (analytics-worker), runtime resource and process state (analytics-worker), and the employee work item. All 20 exact causal facts must be present inside the 26-read investigation before they support this outcome: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Preserve this additional control: the responsible service is analytics-worker; an investigation must not change production state. Prove that the same outcome for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” is deliverable through analytics-worker, using scattered records: 3 healthy replicas per zone across 2 zones means 6 required; 6 observed less 1 reserved for media-service leaves 5 usable and a 1-replica gap. Reconcile that gap with CloudCap's 2026-03-05 standard and 2026-03-04 expedited deliveries, the published change windows, and the independent 2026-03-06 customer date.",
+      "verify": "Prove the observable result for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” after the transition: reopen the employee work item and confirm the persisted result. After the last guarded transition for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”, reopen the employee work item, then reopen the completion conversation so persistence and communication are both proven."
     },
     "reference_assets": [
       "task_files/dob100-012-localize-analytics-crashloop/01-employee-request.md",
@@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@
     "service": "analytics-worker",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_localize_analytics_crashloop",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {
@@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@
       "milestone_id": "verification.outcome"
     }
   ],
-  "prompt": "Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing. The label attached to the alarm may describe where the symptom was noticed rather than the component or runtime condition that actually caused it. This cannot be closed without accounting for reporting freshness, warehouse replica access, scheduled rollups, and downstream decision data. The disputed mechanism is container lifecycle, restart pressure, image state, and process termination evidence. Use the current evidence to settle what can be settled, flag what remains ambiguous, and make the reasoning auditable for the next review. The incident owner is using this finding to set the 2026-03-06 recovery plan for analytics worker. Compare the staffed recovery path with paid acceleration and a separately approved exception, without borrowing capacity protected for another incident.",
+  "prompt": "Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component. Establish the most defensible diagnosis from the current operating evidence, preserve any genuine uncertainty, and record the finding in the existing incident work item without changing production controls. The incident owner is using this finding to set the 2026-03-06 recovery plan for analytics worker. Tell them whether staffed capacity can meet that date, what paid acceleration changes, and which faster option still needs separate approval without taking capacity reserved for another incident.",
   "required_investigations": [
     {
       "any_of": [
@@ -1914,7 +1914,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "investigation",
-        "description": "Treat “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” as one immutable cross-system work item: correlate its Jira record to the linked GitHub evidence and exclude neighboring work that merely shares a name.",
+        "description": "Treat “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” as one immutable cross-system work item: correlate its Jira record to the linked GitHub evidence and exclude neighboring work that merely shares a name.",
         "id": "investigation.scope",
         "weight": 5
       },
@@ -1928,7 +1928,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "investigation",
-        "description": "Use OPS-CONTROL-2026.03 as the operative control and treat OPS-CONTROL-2025.11 as a conflicting historical shortcut before deciding “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”.",
+        "description": "Use OPS-CONTROL-2026.03 as the operative control and treat OPS-CONTROL-2025.11 as a conflicting historical shortcut before deciding “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”.",
         "id": "investigation.authority",
         "weight": 5
       },
@@ -1942,7 +1942,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "investigation",
-        "description": "For “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”, interrogate cluster event history, live Kubernetes pod state (analytics-worker), runtime resource and process state (analytics-worker), and the employee work item; tracker prose and seeded files alone cannot establish the current answer.",
+        "description": "For “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”, interrogate cluster event history, live Kubernetes pod state (analytics-worker), runtime resource and process state (analytics-worker), and the employee work item; tracker prose and seeded files alone cannot establish the current answer.",
         "id": "investigation.live_state",
         "weight": 7
       },
@@ -1968,7 +1968,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "analysis",
-        "description": "Build the causal case for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”: first resolve the same work across the authoritative Jira work item, the cross-tracker link registry, and the linked GitHub issue population; then use the operating-control index and the exact control revision to select the effective rule over the retired shortcut; reconcile ownership, approval, and reported context through the case-room conversation, the PagerDuty change-event history, and the current customer-status record; finally test the competing explanation against cluster event history, live Kubernetes pod state (analytics-worker), runtime resource and process state (analytics-worker), and the employee work item. All 20 exact causal facts must be present inside the 26-read investigation before they support this outcome: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Preserve this additional control: the responsible service is analytics-worker; an investigation must not change production state.",
+        "description": "Build the causal case for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”: first resolve the same work across the authoritative Jira work item, the cross-tracker link registry, and the linked GitHub issue population; then use the operating-control index and the exact control revision to select the effective rule over the retired shortcut; reconcile ownership, approval, and reported context through the case-room conversation, the PagerDuty change-event history, and the current customer-status record; finally test the competing explanation against cluster event history, live Kubernetes pod state (analytics-worker), runtime resource and process state (analytics-worker), and the employee work item. All 20 exact causal facts must be present inside the 26-read investigation before they support this outcome: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Preserve this additional control: the responsible service is analytics-worker; an investigation must not change production state.",
         "id": "analysis.causal_reasoning",
         "weight": 6
       },
@@ -2060,7 +2060,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "analysis",
-        "description": "Prove that the same outcome for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” is deliverable through analytics-worker, using scattered records: 3 healthy replicas per zone across 2 zones means 6 required; 6 observed less 1 reserved for media-service leaves 5 usable and a 1-replica gap. Reconcile that gap with CloudCap's 2026-03-05 standard and 2026-03-04 expedited deliveries, the published change windows, and the independent 2026-03-06 customer date.",
+        "description": "Prove that the same outcome for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” is deliverable through analytics-worker, using scattered records: 3 healthy replicas per zone across 2 zones means 6 required; 6 observed less 1 reserved for media-service leaves 5 usable and a 1-replica gap. Reconcile that gap with CloudCap's 2026-03-05 standard and 2026-03-04 expedited deliveries, the published change windows, and the independent 2026-03-06 customer date.",
         "id": "analysis.capacity_plan",
         "weight": 9
       },
@@ -2074,7 +2074,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "decision",
-        "description": "Choose the branch for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” that can legitimately produce this business state: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Reject a stale-record shortcut, an unsupported hold, and any broader workaround.",
+        "description": "Choose the branch for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” that can legitimately produce this business state: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Reject a stale-record shortcut, an unsupported hold, and any broader workaround.",
         "id": "decision.supported_path",
         "weight": 5
       },
@@ -2154,7 +2154,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "decision",
-        "description": "Compare three concrete, linked readiness options for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” through analytics-worker: standard capacity finishes 2026-03-07 at USD 0; expedited capacity finishes 2026-03-04 at USD 1350; releasing reserved capacity finishes 2026-03-03 at USD 1600 but requires approval beyond CHG-12. Recommend expedite_capacity, record its 2026-03-04 outcome and -2-day variance, and report ON_TIME honestly.",
+        "description": "Compare three concrete, linked readiness options for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” through analytics-worker: standard capacity finishes 2026-03-07 at USD 0; expedited capacity finishes 2026-03-04 at USD 1350; releasing reserved capacity finishes 2026-03-03 at USD 1600 but requires approval beyond CHG-12. Recommend expedite_capacity, record its 2026-03-04 outcome and -2-day variance, and report ON_TIME honestly.",
         "id": "decision.options",
         "weight": 8
       },
@@ -2168,7 +2168,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "state",
-        "description": "Establish the exact business state for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done.",
+        "description": "Establish the exact business state for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done.",
         "id": "state.primary",
         "weight": 14
       },
@@ -2182,7 +2182,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "state",
-        "description": "Coordinate the linked records for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”: close ticket OPS-116 once reported.",
+        "description": "Coordinate the linked records for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”: close ticket OPS-116 once reported.",
         "id": "state.coordination",
         "weight": 6
       },
@@ -2196,7 +2196,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "verification",
-        "description": "Prove the observable result for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” after the transition: reopen the employee work item and confirm the persisted result.",
+        "description": "Prove the observable result for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” after the transition: reopen the employee work item and confirm the persisted result.",
         "id": "verification.outcome",
         "weight": 7
       },
@@ -2216,7 +2216,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "verification",
-        "description": "After the last guarded transition for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”, reopen the employee work item, then reopen the completion conversation so persistence and communication are both proven.",
+        "description": "After the last guarded transition for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”, reopen the employee work item, then reopen the completion conversation so persistence and communication are both proven.",
         "id": "verification.readback",
         "weight": 6
       },
@@ -2242,7 +2242,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "execution",
-        "description": "Respect the causal order for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”: derive the capacity plan only after every source fact it depends on has been read successfully; record the capacity plan before stating it in the completion handoff.",
+        "description": "Respect the causal order for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”: derive the capacity plan only after every source fact it depends on has been read successfully; record the capacity plan before stating it in the completion handoff.",
         "id": "execution.sequence",
         "weight": 6
       },
@@ -2268,7 +2268,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "containment",
-        "description": "Keep “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” contained to its supported records and service boundary: fabricate no records or evidence; preserve every frozen out-of-scope record; introduce no hardcoded credentials.",
+        "description": "Keep “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” contained to its supported records and service boundary: fabricate no records or evidence; preserve every frozen out-of-scope record; introduce no hardcoded credentials.",
         "id": "containment.scope",
         "weight": 7
       },
@@ -2336,7 +2336,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "answer",
-        "description": "Leave the employee-facing conclusion for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” with the exact supported insight: record the component and mechanism responsible for alarm 9609; a currently firing alarm must be treated as an active fault; record the evidence that supports the finding; write a natural scoped completion note, not a keyword list or serialized benchmark object; state the selected option (expedite_capacity) in the scoped completion handoff; state the outcome date (2026-03-04) in the scoped completion handoff; state the approval reference (CHG-12) in the scoped completion handoff; state the timing status (ON_TIME) in the scoped completion handoff; state the binding constraint (CloudCap expedited capacity on 2026-03-04) in the scoped completion handoff.",
+        "description": "Leave the employee-facing conclusion for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” with the exact supported insight: record the component and mechanism responsible for alarm 9609; a currently firing alarm must be treated as an active fault; record the evidence that supports the finding; write a natural scoped completion note, not a keyword list or serialized benchmark object; state the selected option (expedite_capacity) in the scoped completion handoff; state the outcome date (2026-03-04) in the scoped completion handoff; state the approval reference (CHG-12) in the scoped completion handoff; state the timing status (ON_TIME) in the scoped completion handoff; state the binding constraint (CloudCap expedited capacity on 2026-03-04) in the scoped completion handoff.",
         "id": "answer.insights",
         "weight": 4
       },
@@ -2362,7 +2362,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "execution",
-        "description": "Complete “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” without unsafe retries or unproductive loops: reach a conclusion within 12 tool calls; avoid repeated validation runs that make no progress.",
+        "description": "Complete “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” without unsafe retries or unproductive loops: reach a conclusion within 12 tool calls; avoid repeated validation runs that make no progress.",
         "id": "execution.efficiency",
         "weight": 3
       },
@@ -2382,7 +2382,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "execution",
-        "description": "Close “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” only after the business state and readbacks are complete: close OPS-116 only once the finding is submitted, not before.",
+        "description": "Close “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” only after the business state and readbacks are complete: close OPS-116 only once the finding is submitted, not before.",
         "id": "execution.delivery",
         "weight": 2
       }
@@ -2429,12 +2429,12 @@
     "llm_judge": false,
     "pass_rule": "all 16 semantic milestones hold over causal tool evidence, the graded capacity-plan decision record, final world state, readback, and containment",
     "reasoning_contract": {
-      "change_or_record": "Establish the exact business state for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Coordinate the linked records for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”: close ticket OPS-116 once reported. Keep “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” contained to its supported records and service boundary: fabricate no records or evidence; preserve every frozen out-of-scope record; introduce no hardcoded credentials.",
-      "decide": "Choose the branch for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” that can legitimately produce this business state: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Reject a stale-record shortcut, an unsupported hold, and any broader workaround. Compare three concrete, linked readiness options for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” through analytics-worker: standard capacity finishes 2026-03-07 at USD 0; expedited capacity finishes 2026-03-04 at USD 1350; releasing reserved capacity finishes 2026-03-03 at USD 1600 but requires approval beyond CHG-12. Recommend expedite_capacity, record its 2026-03-04 outcome and -2-day variance, and report ON_TIME honestly.",
-      "deliver": "Leave the employee-facing conclusion for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” with the exact supported insight: record the component and mechanism responsible for alarm 9609; a currently firing alarm must be treated as an active fault; record the evidence that supports the finding; write a natural scoped completion note, not a keyword list or serialized benchmark object; state the selected option (expedite_capacity) in the scoped completion handoff; state the outcome date (2026-03-04) in the scoped completion handoff; state the approval reference (CHG-12) in the scoped completion handoff; state the timing status (ON_TIME) in the scoped completion handoff; state the binding constraint (CloudCap expedited capacity on 2026-03-04) in the scoped completion handoff. Close “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” only after the business state and readbacks are complete: close OPS-116 only once the finding is submitted, not before.",
-      "employee_outcome": "Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.",
-      "investigate": "Build the causal case for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”: first resolve the same work across the authoritative Jira work item, the cross-tracker link registry, and the linked GitHub issue population; then use the operating-control index and the exact control revision to select the effective rule over the retired shortcut; reconcile ownership, approval, and reported context through the case-room conversation, the PagerDuty change-event history, and the current customer-status record; finally test the competing explanation against cluster event history, live Kubernetes pod state (analytics-worker), runtime resource and process state (analytics-worker), and the employee work item. All 20 exact causal facts must be present inside the 26-read investigation before they support this outcome: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Preserve this additional control: the responsible service is analytics-worker; an investigation must not change production state. Prove that the same outcome for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” is deliverable through analytics-worker, using scattered records: 3 healthy replicas per zone across 2 zones means 6 required; 6 observed less 1 reserved for media-service leaves 5 usable and a 1-replica gap. Reconcile that gap with CloudCap's 2026-03-05 standard and 2026-03-04 expedited deliveries, the published change windows, and the independent 2026-03-06 customer date.",
-      "verify": "Prove the observable result for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.” after the transition: reopen the employee work item and confirm the persisted result. After the last guarded transition for “Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.”, reopen the employee work item, then reopen the completion conversation so persistence and communication are both proven."
+      "change_or_record": "Establish the exact business state for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Coordinate the linked records for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”: close ticket OPS-116 once reported. Keep “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” contained to its supported records and service boundary: fabricate no records or evidence; preserve every frozen out-of-scope record; introduce no hardcoded credentials.",
+      "decide": "Choose the branch for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” that can legitimately produce this business state: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Reject a stale-record shortcut, an unsupported hold, and any broader workaround. Compare three concrete, linked readiness options for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” through analytics-worker: standard capacity finishes 2026-03-07 at USD 0; expedited capacity finishes 2026-03-04 at USD 1350; releasing reserved capacity finishes 2026-03-03 at USD 1600 but requires approval beyond CHG-12. Recommend expedite_capacity, record its 2026-03-04 outcome and -2-day variance, and report ON_TIME honestly.",
+      "deliver": "Leave the employee-facing conclusion for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” with the exact supported insight: record the component and mechanism responsible for alarm 9609; a currently firing alarm must be treated as an active fault; record the evidence that supports the finding; write a natural scoped completion note, not a keyword list or serialized benchmark object; state the selected option (expedite_capacity) in the scoped completion handoff; state the outcome date (2026-03-04) in the scoped completion handoff; state the approval reference (CHG-12) in the scoped completion handoff; state the timing status (ON_TIME) in the scoped completion handoff; state the binding constraint (CloudCap expedited capacity on 2026-03-04) in the scoped completion handoff. Close “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” only after the business state and readbacks are complete: close OPS-116 only once the finding is submitted, not before.",
+      "employee_outcome": "Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.",
+      "investigate": "Build the causal case for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”: first resolve the same work across the authoritative Jira work item, the cross-tracker link registry, and the linked GitHub issue population; then use the operating-control index and the exact control revision to select the effective rule over the retired shortcut; reconcile ownership, approval, and reported context through the case-room conversation, the PagerDuty change-event history, and the current customer-status record; finally test the competing explanation against cluster event history, live Kubernetes pod state (analytics-worker), runtime resource and process state (analytics-worker), and the employee work item. All 20 exact causal facts must be present inside the 26-read investigation before they support this outcome: record a resource exhaustion diagnosis localizing responsibility to analytics-worker and identifying memory_limit_mb with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Preserve this additional control: the responsible service is analytics-worker; an investigation must not change production state. Prove that the same outcome for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” is deliverable through analytics-worker, using scattered records: 3 healthy replicas per zone across 2 zones means 6 required; 6 observed less 1 reserved for media-service leaves 5 usable and a 1-replica gap. Reconcile that gap with CloudCap's 2026-03-05 standard and 2026-03-04 expedited deliveries, the published change windows, and the independent 2026-03-06 customer date.",
+      "verify": "Prove the observable result for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.” after the transition: reopen the employee work item and confirm the persisted result. After the last guarded transition for “Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.”, reopen the employee work item, then reopen the completion conversation so persistence and communication are both proven."
     },
     "score_weights": {
       "analysis.capacity_plan": 9,
@@ -2458,6 +2458,6 @@
     "verifier": "verifiers/verify_dob100-012-localize-analytics-crashloop.py"
   },
   "task_id": "dob100-012-localize-analytics-crashloop",
-  "task_name": "Alarm 9609 — the error tracker shows nothing.",
+  "task_name": "Alarm 9609 is still firing, yet the error tracker is empty and the label may point to a symptom rather than the failing component.",
   "world_id": "env_software_devops_5a8aaf25"
 }

tasks/dob100-013-localize-analytics-errors.json

@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@
     "service": "analytics-worker",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_localize_analytics_errors",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-014-localize-checkout-latency.json

@@ -1547,7 +1547,7 @@
     "service": "payments",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_localize_checkout_latency",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-015-localize-gateway-latency.json

@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@
     "service": "api-gateway",
     "source_split": "heldout",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_localize_gateway_latency",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-016-localize-media-latency.json

@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@
     "service": "media-service",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_localize_media_latency",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-017-auth-v1-to-v2.json

@@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@
     "service": "api-gateway",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_auth_v1_to_v2",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-018-rca-payments-retry.json

@@ -1547,7 +1547,7 @@
     "service": "payments",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_payments_retry",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-019-rca-catalog-n-plus-one.json

@@ -1548,7 +1548,7 @@
     "service": "catalog",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_catalog_n_plus_one",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-020-rca-notifications-timeout.json

@@ -1548,7 +1548,7 @@
     "service": "notifications",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_notifications_timeout",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-021-rca-inventory-pool.json

@@ -1547,7 +1547,7 @@
     "service": "inventory",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_inventory_pool",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-022-rca-inventory-migrator-security-context.json

@@ -1547,7 +1547,7 @@
     "service": "inventory",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_inventory_migrator_security_context",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-023-rca-inventory-missing-role.json

@@ -141,12 +141,12 @@
   },
   "assets": [
     {
-      "bytes": 718,
+      "bytes": 644,
       "evidence_role": "request",
       "kind": "md",
       "material": false,
       "path": "task_files/dob100-023-rca-inventory-missing-role/01-employee-request.md",
-      "sha256": "f37bddb26788a20dc4be4b9d75735d50d17e898a04f7cc3940e7f61b56b90eac",
+      "sha256": "869749236cc8fda7cb970e90776c581230f924748f08c57cc33df04a16033e9f",
       "source": "employee request"
     },
     {
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@
       "kind": "json",
       "material": false,
       "path": "task_files/dob100-023-rca-inventory-missing-role/51-agent-visible-asset-manifest.json",
-      "sha256": "a53af77596161fbb95aea42e3b4e010b4808822bab4cb704c19d564c344fa105",
+      "sha256": "4cf8a32b3143c645678d79b545268cd4053c2a04dc5b5a87b57181c8108244a1",
       "source": "release builder"
     }
   ],
@@ -1425,12 +1425,12 @@
       "cross-tracker link registry"
     ],
     "reasoning_contract": {
-      "change_or_record": "Establish the exact business state for “The inventory report has never produced output.”: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Coordinate the linked records for “The inventory report has never produced output.”: close ticket OPS-161 once reported. Keep “The inventory report has never produced output.” contained to its supported records and service boundary: fabricate no records or evidence; preserve every frozen out-of-scope record; introduce no hardcoded credentials.",
-      "decide": "Choose the branch for “The inventory report has never produced output.” that can legitimately produce this business state: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Reject a stale-record shortcut, an unsupported hold, and any broader workaround. Compare three concrete, linked readiness options for “The inventory report has never produced output.” through inventory: standard capacity finishes 2026-03-08 at USD 0; expedited capacity finishes 2026-03-05 at USD 900; releasing reserved capacity finishes 2026-03-03 at USD 1800 but requires approval beyond CHG-23. Recommend standard_capacity_plan, record its 2026-03-08 outcome and +0-day variance, and report ON_TIME honestly.",
-      "deliver": "Leave the employee-facing conclusion for “The inventory report has never produced output.” with the exact supported insight: record the evidence-backed root cause for inventory report never ran; record the evidence that supports the finding; write a natural scoped completion note, not a keyword list or serialized benchmark object; state the selected option (standard_capacity_plan) in the scoped completion handoff; state the outcome date (2026-03-08) in the scoped completion handoff; state the approval reference (CHG-23) in the scoped completion handoff; state the timing status (ON_TIME) in the scoped completion handoff; state the binding constraint (CloudCap standard capacity on 2026-03-07) in the scoped completion handoff. Close “The inventory report has never produced output.” only after the business state and readbacks are complete: close OPS-161 only once the finding is submitted, not before.",
-      "employee_outcome": "The inventory report has never produced output.",
-      "investigate": "Build the causal case for “The inventory report has never produced output.”: first resolve the same work across the authoritative Jira work item, the cross-tracker link registry, and the linked GitHub issue population; then use the operating-control index and the exact control revision to select the effective rule over the retired shortcut; reconcile ownership, approval, and reported context through the case-room conversation, the PagerDuty change-event history, and the current customer-status record; finally test the competing explanation against the live database grants, current service logs (inventory), change history (inventory), and runtime resource and process state (inventory). All 20 exact causal facts must be present inside the 28-read investigation before they support this outcome: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Preserve this additional control: the responsible service is inventory; the root cause is a misconfig fault; the offending key is inventory_ro; an investigation must not change production state. Prove that the same outcome for “The inventory report has never produced output.” is deliverable through inventory, using scattered records: 3 healthy replicas per zone across 4 zones means 12 required; 13 observed less 4 reserved for notifications leaves 9 usable and a 3-replica gap. Reconcile that gap with CloudCap's 2026-03-07 standard and 2026-03-04 expedited deliveries, the published change windows, and the independent 2026-03-08 customer date.",
-      "verify": "Prove the observable result for “The inventory report has never produced output.” after the transition: reopen the employee work item and confirm the persisted result. After the last guarded transition for “The inventory report has never produced output.”, reopen the employee work item, then reopen the completion conversation so persistence and communication are both proven."
+      "change_or_record": "Establish the exact business state for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Coordinate the linked records for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”: close ticket OPS-161 once reported. Keep “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” contained to its supported records and service boundary: fabricate no records or evidence; preserve every frozen out-of-scope record; introduce no hardcoded credentials.",
+      "decide": "Choose the branch for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” that can legitimately produce this business state: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Reject a stale-record shortcut, an unsupported hold, and any broader workaround. Compare three concrete, linked readiness options for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” through inventory: standard capacity finishes 2026-03-08 at USD 0; expedited capacity finishes 2026-03-05 at USD 900; releasing reserved capacity finishes 2026-03-03 at USD 1800 but requires approval beyond CHG-23. Recommend standard_capacity_plan, record its 2026-03-08 outcome and +0-day variance, and report ON_TIME honestly.",
+      "deliver": "Leave the employee-facing conclusion for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” with the exact supported insight: record the evidence-backed root cause for inventory report never ran; record the evidence that supports the finding; write a natural scoped completion note, not a keyword list or serialized benchmark object; state the selected option (standard_capacity_plan) in the scoped completion handoff; state the outcome date (2026-03-08) in the scoped completion handoff; state the approval reference (CHG-23) in the scoped completion handoff; state the timing status (ON_TIME) in the scoped completion handoff; state the binding constraint (CloudCap standard capacity on 2026-03-07) in the scoped completion handoff. Close “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” only after the business state and readbacks are complete: close OPS-161 only once the finding is submitted, not before.",
+      "employee_outcome": "The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.",
+      "investigate": "Build the causal case for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”: first resolve the same work across the authoritative Jira work item, the cross-tracker link registry, and the linked GitHub issue population; then use the operating-control index and the exact control revision to select the effective rule over the retired shortcut; reconcile ownership, approval, and reported context through the case-room conversation, the PagerDuty change-event history, and the current customer-status record; finally test the competing explanation against the live database grants, current service logs (inventory), change history (inventory), and runtime resource and process state (inventory). All 20 exact causal facts must be present inside the 28-read investigation before they support this outcome: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Preserve this additional control: the responsible service is inventory; the root cause is a misconfig fault; the offending key is inventory_ro; an investigation must not change production state. Prove that the same outcome for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” is deliverable through inventory, using scattered records: 3 healthy replicas per zone across 4 zones means 12 required; 13 observed less 4 reserved for notifications leaves 9 usable and a 3-replica gap. Reconcile that gap with CloudCap's 2026-03-07 standard and 2026-03-04 expedited deliveries, the published change windows, and the independent 2026-03-08 customer date.",
+      "verify": "Prove the observable result for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” after the transition: reopen the employee work item and confirm the persisted result. After the last guarded transition for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”, reopen the employee work item, then reopen the completion conversation so persistence and communication are both proven."
     },
     "reference_assets": [
       "task_files/dob100-023-rca-inventory-missing-role/01-employee-request.md",
@@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@
     "service": "inventory",
     "source_split": "heldout",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_inventory_missing_role",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {
@@ -1564,7 +1564,7 @@
       "milestone_id": "verification.outcome"
     }
   ],
-  "prompt": "The inventory report has never produced output. The incident record describes the visible effect, but it does not establish whether the apparent owner, a dependency, or the deployed configuration is responsible. For inventory, a credible answer has to reconcile stock reservation, warehouse truth, backorder promises, and race-free quantity updates. Use the current evidence to settle what can be settled, flag what remains ambiguous, and make the reasoning auditable for the next review. This diagnosis will decide whether inventory enters recovery on 2026-03-08. Compare the staffed recovery path with paid acceleration and a separately approved exception, without borrowing capacity protected for another incident.",
+  "prompt": "The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible. Settle the root cause as far as the live evidence allows and record the supported finding in the incident work item, keeping production unchanged and genuine uncertainties visible. This diagnosis will decide whether inventory enters recovery on 2026-03-08. Give the next shift a defensible date, the binding capacity or change-window constraint, the cost of sanctioned acceleration, and the exception route that remains unapproved without displacing another team's reservation.",
   "required_investigations": [
     {
       "any_of": [
@@ -1915,7 +1915,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "investigation",
-        "description": "Treat “The inventory report has never produced output.” as one immutable cross-system work item: correlate its Jira record to the linked GitHub evidence and exclude neighboring work that merely shares a name.",
+        "description": "Treat “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” as one immutable cross-system work item: correlate its Jira record to the linked GitHub evidence and exclude neighboring work that merely shares a name.",
         "id": "investigation.scope",
         "weight": 5
       },
@@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "investigation",
-        "description": "Use OPS-CONTROL-2026.03 as the operative control and treat OPS-CONTROL-2025.11 as a conflicting historical shortcut before deciding “The inventory report has never produced output.”.",
+        "description": "Use OPS-CONTROL-2026.03 as the operative control and treat OPS-CONTROL-2025.11 as a conflicting historical shortcut before deciding “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”.",
         "id": "investigation.authority",
         "weight": 5
       },
@@ -1943,7 +1943,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "investigation",
-        "description": "For “The inventory report has never produced output.”, interrogate the live database grants, current service logs (inventory), change history (inventory), and runtime resource and process state (inventory); tracker prose and seeded files alone cannot establish the current answer.",
+        "description": "For “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”, interrogate the live database grants, current service logs (inventory), change history (inventory), and runtime resource and process state (inventory); tracker prose and seeded files alone cannot establish the current answer.",
         "id": "investigation.live_state",
         "weight": 7
       },
@@ -1981,7 +1981,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "analysis",
-        "description": "Build the causal case for “The inventory report has never produced output.”: first resolve the same work across the authoritative Jira work item, the cross-tracker link registry, and the linked GitHub issue population; then use the operating-control index and the exact control revision to select the effective rule over the retired shortcut; reconcile ownership, approval, and reported context through the case-room conversation, the PagerDuty change-event history, and the current customer-status record; finally test the competing explanation against the live database grants, current service logs (inventory), change history (inventory), and runtime resource and process state (inventory). All 20 exact causal facts must be present inside the 28-read investigation before they support this outcome: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Preserve this additional control: the responsible service is inventory; the root cause is a misconfig fault; the offending key is inventory_ro; an investigation must not change production state.",
+        "description": "Build the causal case for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”: first resolve the same work across the authoritative Jira work item, the cross-tracker link registry, and the linked GitHub issue population; then use the operating-control index and the exact control revision to select the effective rule over the retired shortcut; reconcile ownership, approval, and reported context through the case-room conversation, the PagerDuty change-event history, and the current customer-status record; finally test the competing explanation against the live database grants, current service logs (inventory), change history (inventory), and runtime resource and process state (inventory). All 20 exact causal facts must be present inside the 28-read investigation before they support this outcome: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Preserve this additional control: the responsible service is inventory; the root cause is a misconfig fault; the offending key is inventory_ro; an investigation must not change production state.",
         "id": "analysis.causal_reasoning",
         "weight": 6
       },
@@ -2073,7 +2073,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "analysis",
-        "description": "Prove that the same outcome for “The inventory report has never produced output.” is deliverable through inventory, using scattered records: 3 healthy replicas per zone across 4 zones means 12 required; 13 observed less 4 reserved for notifications leaves 9 usable and a 3-replica gap. Reconcile that gap with CloudCap's 2026-03-07 standard and 2026-03-04 expedited deliveries, the published change windows, and the independent 2026-03-08 customer date.",
+        "description": "Prove that the same outcome for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” is deliverable through inventory, using scattered records: 3 healthy replicas per zone across 4 zones means 12 required; 13 observed less 4 reserved for notifications leaves 9 usable and a 3-replica gap. Reconcile that gap with CloudCap's 2026-03-07 standard and 2026-03-04 expedited deliveries, the published change windows, and the independent 2026-03-08 customer date.",
         "id": "analysis.capacity_plan",
         "weight": 9
       },
@@ -2087,7 +2087,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "decision",
-        "description": "Choose the branch for “The inventory report has never produced output.” that can legitimately produce this business state: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Reject a stale-record shortcut, an unsupported hold, and any broader workaround.",
+        "description": "Choose the branch for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” that can legitimately produce this business state: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Reject a stale-record shortcut, an unsupported hold, and any broader workaround.",
         "id": "decision.supported_path",
         "weight": 5
       },
@@ -2167,7 +2167,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "decision",
-        "description": "Compare three concrete, linked readiness options for “The inventory report has never produced output.” through inventory: standard capacity finishes 2026-03-08 at USD 0; expedited capacity finishes 2026-03-05 at USD 900; releasing reserved capacity finishes 2026-03-03 at USD 1800 but requires approval beyond CHG-23. Recommend standard_capacity_plan, record its 2026-03-08 outcome and +0-day variance, and report ON_TIME honestly.",
+        "description": "Compare three concrete, linked readiness options for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” through inventory: standard capacity finishes 2026-03-08 at USD 0; expedited capacity finishes 2026-03-05 at USD 900; releasing reserved capacity finishes 2026-03-03 at USD 1800 but requires approval beyond CHG-23. Recommend standard_capacity_plan, record its 2026-03-08 outcome and +0-day variance, and report ON_TIME honestly.",
         "id": "decision.options",
         "weight": 8
       },
@@ -2181,7 +2181,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "state",
-        "description": "Establish the exact business state for “The inventory report has never produced output.”: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done.",
+        "description": "Establish the exact business state for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done.",
         "id": "state.primary",
         "weight": 14
       },
@@ -2195,7 +2195,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "state",
-        "description": "Coordinate the linked records for “The inventory report has never produced output.”: close ticket OPS-161 once reported.",
+        "description": "Coordinate the linked records for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”: close ticket OPS-161 once reported.",
         "id": "state.coordination",
         "weight": 6
       },
@@ -2209,7 +2209,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "verification",
-        "description": "Prove the observable result for “The inventory report has never produced output.” after the transition: reopen the employee work item and confirm the persisted result.",
+        "description": "Prove the observable result for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” after the transition: reopen the employee work item and confirm the persisted result.",
         "id": "verification.outcome",
         "weight": 7
       },
@@ -2229,7 +2229,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "verification",
-        "description": "After the last guarded transition for “The inventory report has never produced output.”, reopen the employee work item, then reopen the completion conversation so persistence and communication are both proven.",
+        "description": "After the last guarded transition for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”, reopen the employee work item, then reopen the completion conversation so persistence and communication are both proven.",
         "id": "verification.readback",
         "weight": 6
       },
@@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "execution",
-        "description": "Respect the causal order for “The inventory report has never produced output.”: derive the capacity plan only after every source fact it depends on has been read successfully; record the capacity plan before stating it in the completion handoff.",
+        "description": "Respect the causal order for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”: derive the capacity plan only after every source fact it depends on has been read successfully; record the capacity plan before stating it in the completion handoff.",
         "id": "execution.sequence",
         "weight": 6
       },
@@ -2281,7 +2281,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "containment",
-        "description": "Keep “The inventory report has never produced output.” contained to its supported records and service boundary: fabricate no records or evidence; preserve every frozen out-of-scope record; introduce no hardcoded credentials.",
+        "description": "Keep “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” contained to its supported records and service boundary: fabricate no records or evidence; preserve every frozen out-of-scope record; introduce no hardcoded credentials.",
         "id": "containment.scope",
         "weight": 7
       },
@@ -2343,7 +2343,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "answer",
-        "description": "Leave the employee-facing conclusion for “The inventory report has never produced output.” with the exact supported insight: record the evidence-backed root cause for inventory report never ran; record the evidence that supports the finding; write a natural scoped completion note, not a keyword list or serialized benchmark object; state the selected option (standard_capacity_plan) in the scoped completion handoff; state the outcome date (2026-03-08) in the scoped completion handoff; state the approval reference (CHG-23) in the scoped completion handoff; state the timing status (ON_TIME) in the scoped completion handoff; state the binding constraint (CloudCap standard capacity on 2026-03-07) in the scoped completion handoff.",
+        "description": "Leave the employee-facing conclusion for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” with the exact supported insight: record the evidence-backed root cause for inventory report never ran; record the evidence that supports the finding; write a natural scoped completion note, not a keyword list or serialized benchmark object; state the selected option (standard_capacity_plan) in the scoped completion handoff; state the outcome date (2026-03-08) in the scoped completion handoff; state the approval reference (CHG-23) in the scoped completion handoff; state the timing status (ON_TIME) in the scoped completion handoff; state the binding constraint (CloudCap standard capacity on 2026-03-07) in the scoped completion handoff.",
         "id": "answer.insights",
         "weight": 4
       },
@@ -2369,7 +2369,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "execution",
-        "description": "Complete “The inventory report has never produced output.” without unsafe retries or unproductive loops: reach a conclusion within 14 tool calls; avoid repeated validation runs that make no progress.",
+        "description": "Complete “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” without unsafe retries or unproductive loops: reach a conclusion within 14 tool calls; avoid repeated validation runs that make no progress.",
         "id": "execution.efficiency",
         "weight": 3
       },
@@ -2389,7 +2389,7 @@
           }
         ],
         "category": "execution",
-        "description": "Close “The inventory report has never produced output.” only after the business state and readbacks are complete: close OPS-161 only once the finding is submitted, not before.",
+        "description": "Close “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” only after the business state and readbacks are complete: close OPS-161 only once the finding is submitted, not before.",
         "id": "execution.delivery",
         "weight": 2
       }
@@ -2436,12 +2436,12 @@
     "llm_judge": false,
     "pass_rule": "all 16 semantic milestones hold over causal tool evidence, the graded capacity-plan decision record, final world state, readback, and containment",
     "reasoning_contract": {
-      "change_or_record": "Establish the exact business state for “The inventory report has never produced output.”: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Coordinate the linked records for “The inventory report has never produced output.”: close ticket OPS-161 once reported. Keep “The inventory report has never produced output.” contained to its supported records and service boundary: fabricate no records or evidence; preserve every frozen out-of-scope record; introduce no hardcoded credentials.",
-      "decide": "Choose the branch for “The inventory report has never produced output.” that can legitimately produce this business state: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Reject a stale-record shortcut, an unsupported hold, and any broader workaround. Compare three concrete, linked readiness options for “The inventory report has never produced output.” through inventory: standard capacity finishes 2026-03-08 at USD 0; expedited capacity finishes 2026-03-05 at USD 900; releasing reserved capacity finishes 2026-03-03 at USD 1800 but requires approval beyond CHG-23. Recommend standard_capacity_plan, record its 2026-03-08 outcome and +0-day variance, and report ON_TIME honestly.",
-      "deliver": "Leave the employee-facing conclusion for “The inventory report has never produced output.” with the exact supported insight: record the evidence-backed root cause for inventory report never ran; record the evidence that supports the finding; write a natural scoped completion note, not a keyword list or serialized benchmark object; state the selected option (standard_capacity_plan) in the scoped completion handoff; state the outcome date (2026-03-08) in the scoped completion handoff; state the approval reference (CHG-23) in the scoped completion handoff; state the timing status (ON_TIME) in the scoped completion handoff; state the binding constraint (CloudCap standard capacity on 2026-03-07) in the scoped completion handoff. Close “The inventory report has never produced output.” only after the business state and readbacks are complete: close OPS-161 only once the finding is submitted, not before.",
-      "employee_outcome": "The inventory report has never produced output.",
-      "investigate": "Build the causal case for “The inventory report has never produced output.”: first resolve the same work across the authoritative Jira work item, the cross-tracker link registry, and the linked GitHub issue population; then use the operating-control index and the exact control revision to select the effective rule over the retired shortcut; reconcile ownership, approval, and reported context through the case-room conversation, the PagerDuty change-event history, and the current customer-status record; finally test the competing explanation against the live database grants, current service logs (inventory), change history (inventory), and runtime resource and process state (inventory). All 20 exact causal facts must be present inside the 28-read investigation before they support this outcome: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Preserve this additional control: the responsible service is inventory; the root cause is a misconfig fault; the offending key is inventory_ro; an investigation must not change production state. Prove that the same outcome for “The inventory report has never produced output.” is deliverable through inventory, using scattered records: 3 healthy replicas per zone across 4 zones means 12 required; 13 observed less 4 reserved for notifications leaves 9 usable and a 3-replica gap. Reconcile that gap with CloudCap's 2026-03-07 standard and 2026-03-04 expedited deliveries, the published change windows, and the independent 2026-03-08 customer date.",
-      "verify": "Prove the observable result for “The inventory report has never produced output.” after the transition: reopen the employee work item and confirm the persisted result. After the last guarded transition for “The inventory report has never produced output.”, reopen the employee work item, then reopen the completion conversation so persistence and communication are both proven."
+      "change_or_record": "Establish the exact business state for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Coordinate the linked records for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”: close ticket OPS-161 once reported. Keep “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” contained to its supported records and service boundary: fabricate no records or evidence; preserve every frozen out-of-scope record; introduce no hardcoded credentials.",
+      "decide": "Choose the branch for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” that can legitimately produce this business state: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Reject a stale-record shortcut, an unsupported hold, and any broader workaround. Compare three concrete, linked readiness options for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” through inventory: standard capacity finishes 2026-03-08 at USD 0; expedited capacity finishes 2026-03-05 at USD 900; releasing reserved capacity finishes 2026-03-03 at USD 1800 but requires approval beyond CHG-23. Recommend standard_capacity_plan, record its 2026-03-08 outcome and +0-day variance, and report ON_TIME honestly.",
+      "deliver": "Leave the employee-facing conclusion for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” with the exact supported insight: record the evidence-backed root cause for inventory report never ran; record the evidence that supports the finding; write a natural scoped completion note, not a keyword list or serialized benchmark object; state the selected option (standard_capacity_plan) in the scoped completion handoff; state the outcome date (2026-03-08) in the scoped completion handoff; state the approval reference (CHG-23) in the scoped completion handoff; state the timing status (ON_TIME) in the scoped completion handoff; state the binding constraint (CloudCap standard capacity on 2026-03-07) in the scoped completion handoff. Close “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” only after the business state and readbacks are complete: close OPS-161 only once the finding is submitted, not before.",
+      "employee_outcome": "The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.",
+      "investigate": "Build the causal case for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”: first resolve the same work across the authoritative Jira work item, the cross-tracker link registry, and the linked GitHub issue population; then use the operating-control index and the exact control revision to select the effective rule over the retired shortcut; reconcile ownership, approval, and reported context through the case-room conversation, the PagerDuty change-event history, and the current customer-status record; finally test the competing explanation against the live database grants, current service logs (inventory), change history (inventory), and runtime resource and process state (inventory). All 20 exact causal facts must be present inside the 28-read investigation before they support this outcome: record a configuration error diagnosis localizing responsibility to inventory and identifying inventory_ro with cited evidence; move the employee work item to done. Preserve this additional control: the responsible service is inventory; the root cause is a misconfig fault; the offending key is inventory_ro; an investigation must not change production state. Prove that the same outcome for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” is deliverable through inventory, using scattered records: 3 healthy replicas per zone across 4 zones means 12 required; 13 observed less 4 reserved for notifications leaves 9 usable and a 3-replica gap. Reconcile that gap with CloudCap's 2026-03-07 standard and 2026-03-04 expedited deliveries, the published change windows, and the independent 2026-03-08 customer date.",
+      "verify": "Prove the observable result for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.” after the transition: reopen the employee work item and confirm the persisted result. After the last guarded transition for “The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.”, reopen the employee work item, then reopen the completion conversation so persistence and communication are both proven."
     },
     "score_weights": {
       "analysis.capacity_plan": 9,
@@ -2465,6 +2465,6 @@
     "verifier": "verifiers/verify_dob100-023-rca-inventory-missing-role.py"
   },
   "task_id": "dob100-023-rca-inventory-missing-role",
-  "task_name": "The inventory report has never produced output.",
+  "task_name": "The inventory report has never produced output, and the incident record does not establish whether the owner, a dependency, or deployed configuration is responsible.",
   "world_id": "env_software_devops_5a8aaf25"
 }

tasks/dob100-024-attr-three-at-once.json

@@ -1576,7 +1576,7 @@
     "service": "checkout",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_attr_three_at_once",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-025-rca-catalog-gc-thrash.json

@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@
     "service": "catalog",
     "source_split": "heldout",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_catalog_gc_thrash",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-026-rca-storefront-traffic-flood.json

@@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@
     "service": "storefront-web",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_storefront_traffic_flood",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-027-rca-analytics-untolerated-taint.json

@@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@
     "service": "analytics-worker",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_analytics_untolerated_taint",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-028-rca-media-recreate-strategy.json

@@ -1548,7 +1548,7 @@
     "service": "media-service",
     "source_split": "heldout",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_media_recreate_strategy",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-029-rca-inventory-unbound-storage.json

@@ -1547,7 +1547,7 @@
     "service": "inventory",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rca_inventory_unbound_storage",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-030-rcn-distinct-checkout-bugs.json

@@ -1539,7 +1539,7 @@
     "service": "checkout",
     "source_split": "heldout",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_rcn_distinct_checkout_bugs",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {

tasks/dob100-031-impl-backoff.json

@@ -1537,7 +1537,7 @@
     "service": "payments",
     "source_split": "train",
     "source_task_id": "tsk_impl_backoff",
-    "version": "3.2.6"
+    "version": "3.2.7"
   },
   "post_write_verifications": [
     {