Context stringlengths 285 157k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Vladimir Goryachev. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Vladimir Goryachev, Kyle Miller, Scott Morrison, Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Count
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
#align_import data.nat.nth from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7fdd4f3746cb059edfdb5d52cba98f66fce418c0"
/-!
# The `n`th Number Satisfying a Predicate
This file defines a function for "what is the `n`th number that satisifies a given predicate `p`",
and provides lemmas that deal with this function and its connection to `Nat.count`.
## Main definitions
* `Nat.nth p n`: The `n`-th natural `k` (zero-indexed) such that `p k`. If there is no
such natural (that is, `p` is true for at most `n` naturals), then `Nat.nth p n = 0`.
## Main results
* `Nat.nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin`: For a fintely-often true `p`, gives the cardinality of the set of
numbers satisfying `p` above particular values of `nth p`
* `Nat.gc_count_nth`: Establishes a Galois connection between `Nat.nth p` and `Nat.count p`.
* `Nat.nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat`: For an infinitely-ofter true predicate, `nth` agrees with the
order-isomorphism of the subtype to the natural numbers.
There has been some discussion on the subject of whether both of `nth` and
`Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat` should exist. See discussion
[here](https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/9457#pullrequestreview-767221180).
Future work should address how lemmas that use these should be written.
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (p : ℕ → Prop)
/-- Find the `n`-th natural number satisfying `p` (indexed from `0`, so `nth p 0` is the first
natural number satisfying `p`), or `0` if there is no such number. See also
`Subtype.orderIsoOfNat` for the order isomorphism with ℕ when `p` is infinitely often true. -/
noncomputable def nth (p : ℕ → Prop) (n : ℕ) : ℕ := by
classical exact
if h : Set.Finite (setOf p) then (h.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)).getD n 0
else @Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat (setOf p) (Set.Infinite.to_subtype h) n
#align nat.nth Nat.nth
variable {p}
/-!
### Lemmas about `Nat.nth` on a finite set
-/
theorem nth_of_card_le (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {n : ℕ} (hn : hf.toFinset.card ≤ n) :
nth p n = 0 := by rw [nth, dif_pos hf, List.getD_eq_default]; rwa [Finset.length_sort]
#align nat.nth_of_card_le Nat.nth_of_card_le
theorem nth_eq_getD_sort (h : (setOf p).Finite) (n : ℕ) :
nth p n = (h.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)).getD n 0 :=
dif_pos h
#align nat.nth_eq_nthd_sort Nat.nth_eq_getD_sort
theorem nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) :
nth p n = hf.toFinset.orderEmbOfFin rfl ⟨n, hn⟩ := by
rw [nth_eq_getD_sort hf, Finset.orderEmbOfFin_apply, List.getD_eq_get]
#align nat.nth_eq_order_emb_of_fin Nat.nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin
theorem nth_strictMonoOn (hf : (setOf p).Finite) :
StrictMonoOn (nth p) (Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card) := by
rintro m (hm : m < _) n (hn : n < _) h
simp only [nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin, *]
exact OrderEmbedding.strictMono _ h
#align nat.nth_strict_mono_on Nat.nth_strictMonoOn
theorem nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n)
(hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) : nth p m < nth p n :=
nth_strictMonoOn hf (h.trans hn) hn h
#align nat.nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card Nat.nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card
theorem nth_le_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n)
(hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) : nth p m ≤ nth p n :=
(nth_strictMonoOn hf).monotoneOn (h.trans_lt hn) hn h
#align nat.nth_le_nth_of_lt_card Nat.nth_le_nth_of_lt_card
theorem lt_of_nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : nth p m < nth p n)
(hm : m < hf.toFinset.card) : m < n :=
not_le.1 fun hle => h.not_le <| nth_le_nth_of_lt_card hf hle hm
#align nat.lt_of_nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card Nat.lt_of_nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card
theorem le_of_nth_le_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : nth p m ≤ nth p n)
(hm : m < hf.toFinset.card) : m ≤ n :=
not_lt.1 fun hlt => h.not_lt <| nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card hf hlt hm
#align nat.le_of_nth_le_nth_of_lt_card Nat.le_of_nth_le_nth_of_lt_card
theorem nth_injOn (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : (Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card).InjOn (nth p) :=
(nth_strictMonoOn hf).injOn
#align nat.nth_inj_on Nat.nth_injOn
theorem range_nth_of_finite (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : Set.range (nth p) = insert 0 (setOf p) := by
simpa only [← nth_eq_getD_sort hf, mem_sort, Set.Finite.mem_toFinset]
using Set.range_list_getD (hf.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)) 0
#align nat.range_nth_of_finite Nat.range_nth_of_finite
@[simp]
theorem image_nth_Iio_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : nth p '' Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card = setOf p :=
calc
nth p '' Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card = Set.range (hf.toFinset.orderEmbOfFin rfl) := by
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_image, Set.mem_range, Fin.exists_iff, ← nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin hf,
Set.mem_Iio, exists_prop]
_ = setOf p := by rw [range_orderEmbOfFin, Set.Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align nat.image_nth_Iio_card Nat.image_nth_Iio_card
theorem nth_mem_of_lt_card {n : ℕ} (hf : (setOf p).Finite) (hlt : n < hf.toFinset.card) :
p (nth p n) :=
(image_nth_Iio_card hf).subset <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hlt
#align nat.nth_mem_of_lt_card Nat.nth_mem_of_lt_card
theorem exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {x} (h : p x) :
∃ n, n < hf.toFinset.card ∧ nth p n = x := by
rwa [← @Set.mem_setOf_eq _ _ p, ← image_nth_Iio_card hf] at h
#align nat.exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq Nat.exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq
/-!
### Lemmas about `Nat.nth` on an infinite set
-/
/-- When `s` is an infinite set, `nth` agrees with `Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat`. -/
theorem nth_apply_eq_orderIsoOfNat (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) (n : ℕ) :
nth p n = @Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat (setOf p) hf.to_subtype n := by rw [nth, dif_neg hf]
#align nat.nth_apply_eq_order_iso_of_nat Nat.nth_apply_eq_orderIsoOfNat
/-- When `s` is an infinite set, `nth` agrees with `Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat`. -/
theorem nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) :
nth p = (↑) ∘ @Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat (setOf p) hf.to_subtype :=
funext <| nth_apply_eq_orderIsoOfNat hf
#align nat.nth_eq_order_iso_of_nat Nat.nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat
theorem nth_strictMono (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : StrictMono (nth p) := by
rw [nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat hf]
exact (Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp (OrderIso.strictMono _)
#align nat.nth_strict_mono Nat.nth_strictMono
theorem nth_injective (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : Function.Injective (nth p) :=
(nth_strictMono hf).injective
#align nat.nth_injective Nat.nth_injective
theorem nth_monotone (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : Monotone (nth p) :=
(nth_strictMono hf).monotone
#align nat.nth_monotone Nat.nth_monotone
theorem nth_lt_nth (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) {k n} : nth p k < nth p n ↔ k < n :=
(nth_strictMono hf).lt_iff_lt
#align nat.nth_lt_nth Nat.nth_lt_nth
theorem nth_le_nth (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) {k n} : nth p k ≤ nth p n ↔ k ≤ n :=
(nth_strictMono hf).le_iff_le
#align nat.nth_le_nth Nat.nth_le_nth
theorem range_nth_of_infinite (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : Set.range (nth p) = setOf p := by
rw [nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat hf]
haveI := hf.to_subtype
-- Porting note: added `classical`; probably, Lean 3 found instance by unification
classical exact Nat.Subtype.coe_comp_ofNat_range
#align nat.range_nth_of_infinite Nat.range_nth_of_infinite
theorem nth_mem_of_infinite (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) (n : ℕ) : p (nth p n) :=
Set.range_subset_iff.1 (range_nth_of_infinite hf).le n
#align nat.nth_mem_of_infinite Nat.nth_mem_of_infinite
/-!
### Lemmas that work for finite and infinite sets
-/
theorem exists_lt_card_nth_eq {x} (h : p x) :
∃ n, (∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) ∧ nth p n = x := by
refine (setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => ?_) fun hf => ?_
· rcases exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq hf h with ⟨n, hn, hx⟩
exact ⟨n, fun _ => hn, hx⟩
· rw [← @Set.mem_setOf_eq _ _ p, ← range_nth_of_infinite hf] at h
rcases h with ⟨n, hx⟩
exact ⟨n, fun hf' => absurd hf' hf, hx⟩
#align nat.exists_lt_card_nth_eq Nat.exists_lt_card_nth_eq
theorem subset_range_nth : setOf p ⊆ Set.range (nth p) := fun x (hx : p x) =>
let ⟨n, _, hn⟩ := exists_lt_card_nth_eq hx
⟨n, hn⟩
#align nat.subset_range_nth Nat.subset_range_nth
theorem range_nth_subset : Set.range (nth p) ⊆ insert 0 (setOf p) :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun h => (range_nth_of_finite h).subset) fun h =>
(range_nth_of_infinite h).trans_subset (Set.subset_insert _ _)
#align nat.range_nth_subset Nat.range_nth_subset
theorem nth_mem (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) : p (nth p n) :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => nth_mem_of_lt_card hf (h hf)) fun h =>
nth_mem_of_infinite h n
#align nat.nth_mem Nat.nth_mem
theorem nth_lt_nth' {m n : ℕ} (hlt : m < n) (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) :
nth p m < nth p n :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card hf hlt (h _)) fun hf =>
(nth_lt_nth hf).2 hlt
#align nat.nth_lt_nth' Nat.nth_lt_nth'
theorem nth_le_nth' {m n : ℕ} (hle : m ≤ n) (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) :
nth p m ≤ nth p n :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => nth_le_nth_of_lt_card hf hle (h _)) fun hf =>
(nth_le_nth hf).2 hle
#align nat.nth_le_nth' Nat.nth_le_nth'
theorem le_nth {n : ℕ} (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) : n ≤ nth p n :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim
(fun hf => ((nth_strictMonoOn hf).mono <| Set.Iic_subset_Iio.2 (h _)).Iic_id_le _ le_rfl)
fun hf => (nth_strictMono hf).id_le _
#align nat.le_nth Nat.le_nth
theorem isLeast_nth {n} (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) :
IsLeast {i | p i ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < i} (nth p n) :=
⟨⟨nth_mem n h, fun _k hk => nth_lt_nth' hk h⟩, fun _x hx =>
let ⟨k, hk, hkx⟩ := exists_lt_card_nth_eq hx.1
(lt_or_le k n).elim (fun hlt => absurd hkx (hx.2 _ hlt).ne) fun hle => hkx ▸ nth_le_nth' hle hk⟩
#align nat.is_least_nth Nat.isLeast_nth
theorem isLeast_nth_of_lt_card {n : ℕ} (hf : (setOf p).Finite) (hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) :
IsLeast {i | p i ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < i} (nth p n) :=
isLeast_nth fun _ => hn
#align nat.is_least_nth_of_lt_card Nat.isLeast_nth_of_lt_card
theorem isLeast_nth_of_infinite (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) (n : ℕ) :
IsLeast {i | p i ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < i} (nth p n) :=
isLeast_nth fun h => absurd h hf
#align nat.is_least_nth_of_infinite Nat.isLeast_nth_of_infinite
/-- An alternative recursive definition of `Nat.nth`: `Nat.nth s n` is the infimum of `x ∈ s` such
that `Nat.nth s k < x` for all `k < n`, if this set is nonempty. We do not assume that the set is
nonempty because we use the same "garbage value" `0` both for `sInf` on `ℕ` and for `Nat.nth s n`
for `n ≥ card s`. -/
theorem nth_eq_sInf (p : ℕ → Prop) (n : ℕ) : nth p n = sInf {x | p x ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < x} := by
by_cases hn : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card
· exact (isLeast_nth hn).csInf_eq.symm
· push_neg at hn
rcases hn with ⟨hf, hn⟩
rw [nth_of_card_le _ hn]
refine ((congr_arg sInf <| Set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun k hk => ?_).trans sInf_empty).symm
rcases exists_lt_card_nth_eq hk.1 with ⟨k, hlt, rfl⟩
exact (hk.2 _ ((hlt hf).trans_le hn)).false
#align nat.nth_eq_Inf Nat.nth_eq_sInf
theorem nth_zero : nth p 0 = sInf (setOf p) := by rw [nth_eq_sInf]; simp
#align nat.nth_zero Nat.nth_zero
@[simp]
theorem nth_zero_of_zero (h : p 0) : nth p 0 = 0 := by simp [nth_zero, h]
#align nat.nth_zero_of_zero Nat.nth_zero_of_zero
theorem nth_zero_of_exists [DecidablePred p] (h : ∃ n, p n) : nth p 0 = Nat.find h := by
rw [nth_zero]; convert Nat.sInf_def h
#align nat.nth_zero_of_exists Nat.nth_zero_of_exists
theorem nth_eq_zero {n} :
nth p n = 0 ↔ p 0 ∧ n = 0 ∨ ∃ hf : (setOf p).Finite, hf.toFinset.card ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [or_iff_not_imp_right, not_exists, not_le]
exact fun hn => ⟨h ▸ nth_mem _ hn, nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| h ▸ le_nth hn⟩
· rintro (⟨h₀, rfl⟩ | ⟨hf, hle⟩)
exacts [nth_zero_of_zero h₀, nth_of_card_le hf hle]
#align nat.nth_eq_zero Nat.nth_eq_zero
theorem nth_eq_zero_mono (h₀ : ¬p 0) {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b) (ha : nth p a = 0) : nth p b = 0 := by
simp only [nth_eq_zero, h₀, false_and_iff, false_or_iff] at ha ⊢
exact ha.imp fun hf hle => hle.trans hab
#align nat.nth_eq_zero_mono Nat.nth_eq_zero_mono
theorem le_nth_of_lt_nth_succ {k a : ℕ} (h : a < nth p (k + 1)) (ha : p a) : a ≤ nth p k := by
cases' (setOf p).finite_or_infinite with hf hf
· rcases exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq hf ha with ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩
cases' lt_or_le (k + 1) hf.toFinset.card with hk hk
· rwa [(nth_strictMonoOn hf).lt_iff_lt hn hk, Nat.lt_succ_iff,
← (nth_strictMonoOn hf).le_iff_le hn (k.lt_succ_self.trans hk)] at h
· rw [nth_of_card_le _ hk] at h
exact absurd h (zero_le _).not_lt
· rcases subset_range_nth ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rwa [nth_lt_nth hf, Nat.lt_succ_iff, ← nth_le_nth hf] at h
#align nat.le_nth_of_lt_nth_succ Nat.le_nth_of_lt_nth_succ
section Count
variable (p) [DecidablePred p]
@[simp]
theorem count_nth_zero : count p (nth p 0) = 0 := by
rw [count_eq_card_filter_range, card_eq_zero, filter_eq_empty_iff, nth_zero]
exact fun n h₁ h₂ => (mem_range.1 h₁).not_le (Nat.sInf_le h₂)
#align nat.count_nth_zero Nat.count_nth_zero
theorem filter_range_nth_subset_insert (k : ℕ) :
(range (nth p (k + 1))).filter p ⊆ insert (nth p k) ((range (nth p k)).filter p) := by
intro a ha
simp only [mem_insert, mem_filter, mem_range] at ha ⊢
exact (le_nth_of_lt_nth_succ ha.1 ha.2).eq_or_lt.imp_right fun h => ⟨h, ha.2⟩
#align nat.filter_range_nth_subset_insert Nat.filter_range_nth_subset_insert
variable {p}
theorem filter_range_nth_eq_insert {k : ℕ}
(hlt : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, k + 1 < hf.toFinset.card) :
(range (nth p (k + 1))).filter p = insert (nth p k) ((range (nth p k)).filter p) := by
refine (filter_range_nth_subset_insert p k).antisymm fun a ha => ?_
simp only [mem_insert, mem_filter, mem_range] at ha ⊢
have : nth p k < nth p (k + 1) := nth_lt_nth' k.lt_succ_self hlt
rcases ha with (rfl | ⟨hlt, hpa⟩)
· exact ⟨this, nth_mem _ fun hf => k.lt_succ_self.trans (hlt hf)⟩
· exact ⟨hlt.trans this, hpa⟩
#align nat.filter_range_nth_eq_insert Nat.filter_range_nth_eq_insert
theorem filter_range_nth_eq_insert_of_finite (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {k : ℕ}
(hlt : k + 1 < hf.toFinset.card) :
(range (nth p (k + 1))).filter p = insert (nth p k) ((range (nth p k)).filter p) :=
filter_range_nth_eq_insert fun _ => hlt
#align nat.filter_range_nth_eq_insert_of_finite Nat.filter_range_nth_eq_insert_of_finite
theorem filter_range_nth_eq_insert_of_infinite (hp : (setOf p).Infinite) (k : ℕ) :
(range (nth p (k + 1))).filter p = insert (nth p k) ((range (nth p k)).filter p) :=
filter_range_nth_eq_insert fun hf => absurd hf hp
#align nat.filter_range_nth_eq_insert_of_infinite Nat.filter_range_nth_eq_insert_of_infinite
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Nth.lean | 336 | 342 | theorem count_nth {n : ℕ} (hn : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) :
count p (nth p n) = n := by |
induction' n with k ihk
· exact count_nth_zero _
· rw [count_eq_card_filter_range, filter_range_nth_eq_insert hn, card_insert_of_not_mem, ←
count_eq_card_filter_range, ihk fun hf => lt_of_succ_lt (hn hf)]
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.FunctorN
#align_import algebraic_topology.dold_kan.normalized from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32a7e535287f9c73f2e4d2aef306a39190f0b504"
/-!
# Comparison with the normalized Moore complex functor
In this file, we show that when the category `A` is abelian,
there is an isomorphism `N₁_iso_normalizedMooreComplex_comp_toKaroubi` between
the functor `N₁ : SimplicialObject A ⥤ Karoubi (ChainComplex A ℕ)`
defined in `FunctorN.lean` and the composition of
`normalizedMooreComplex A` with the inclusion
`ChainComplex A ℕ ⥤ Karoubi (ChainComplex A ℕ)`.
This isomorphism shall be used in `Equivalence.lean` in order to obtain
the Dold-Kan equivalence
`CategoryTheory.Abelian.DoldKan.equivalence : SimplicialObject A ≌ ChainComplex A ℕ`
with a functor (definitionally) equal to `normalizedMooreComplex A`.
(See `Equivalence.lean` for the general strategy of proof of the Dold-Kan equivalence.)
-/
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
CategoryTheory.Subobject CategoryTheory.Idempotents DoldKan
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace DoldKan
universe v
variable {A : Type*} [Category A] [Abelian A] {X : SimplicialObject A}
theorem HigherFacesVanish.inclusionOfMooreComplexMap (n : ℕ) :
HigherFacesVanish (n + 1) ((inclusionOfMooreComplexMap X).f (n + 1)) := fun j _ => by
dsimp [AlgebraicTopology.inclusionOfMooreComplexMap, NormalizedMooreComplex.objX]
rw [← factorThru_arrow _ _ (finset_inf_arrow_factors Finset.univ _ j
(by simp only [Finset.mem_univ])), assoc, kernelSubobject_arrow_comp, comp_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.higher_faces_vanish.inclusion_of_Moore_complex_map AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.HigherFacesVanish.inclusionOfMooreComplexMap
theorem factors_normalizedMooreComplex_PInfty (n : ℕ) :
Subobject.Factors (NormalizedMooreComplex.objX X n) (PInfty.f n) := by
rcases n with _|n
· apply top_factors
· rw [PInfty_f, NormalizedMooreComplex.objX, finset_inf_factors]
intro i _
apply kernelSubobject_factors
exact (HigherFacesVanish.of_P (n + 1) n) i le_add_self
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.factors_normalized_Moore_complex_P_infty AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.factors_normalizedMooreComplex_PInfty
/-- `PInfty` factors through the normalized Moore complex -/
@[simps!]
def PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex (X : SimplicialObject A) : K[X] ⟶ N[X] :=
ChainComplex.ofHom _ _ _ _ _ _
(fun n => factorThru _ _ (factors_normalizedMooreComplex_PInfty n)) fun n => by
rw [← cancel_mono (NormalizedMooreComplex.objX X n).arrow, assoc, assoc, factorThru_arrow,
← inclusionOfMooreComplexMap_f, ← normalizedMooreComplex_objD,
← (inclusionOfMooreComplexMap X).comm (n + 1) n, inclusionOfMooreComplexMap_f,
factorThru_arrow_assoc, ← alternatingFaceMapComplex_obj_d]
exact PInfty.comm (n + 1) n
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.P_infty_to_normalized_Moore_complex AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex_comp_inclusionOfMooreComplexMap (X : SimplicialObject A) :
PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex X ≫ inclusionOfMooreComplexMap X = PInfty := by aesop_cat
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.P_infty_to_normalized_Moore_complex_comp_inclusion_of_Moore_complex_map AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex_comp_inclusionOfMooreComplexMap
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex_naturality {X Y : SimplicialObject A} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
AlternatingFaceMapComplex.map f ≫ PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex Y =
PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex X ≫ NormalizedMooreComplex.map f := by
aesop_cat
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.P_infty_to_normalized_Moore_complex_naturality AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex_naturality
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem PInfty_comp_PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex (X : SimplicialObject A) :
PInfty ≫ PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex X = PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex X := by aesop_cat
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.P_infty_comp_P_infty_to_normalized_Moore_complex AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.PInfty_comp_PInftyToNormalizedMooreComplex
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/DoldKan/Normalized.lean | 97 | 102 | theorem inclusionOfMooreComplexMap_comp_PInfty (X : SimplicialObject A) :
inclusionOfMooreComplexMap X ≫ PInfty = inclusionOfMooreComplexMap X := by |
ext (_|n)
· dsimp
simp only [comp_id]
· exact (HigherFacesVanish.inclusionOfMooreComplexMap n).comp_P_eq_self
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Data.List.Lemmas
/-!
# Counting in lists
This file proves basic properties of `List.countP` and `List.count`, which count the number of
elements of a list satisfying a predicate and equal to a given element respectively. Their
definitions can be found in `Batteries.Data.List.Basic`.
-/
open Nat
namespace List
section countP
variable (p q : α → Bool)
@[simp] theorem countP_nil : countP p [] = 0 := rfl
protected theorem countP_go_eq_add (l) : countP.go p l n = n + countP.go p l 0 := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => rfl
| cons head tail ih =>
unfold countP.go
rw [ih (n := n + 1), ih (n := n), ih (n := 1)]
if h : p head then simp [h, Nat.add_assoc] else simp [h]
@[simp] theorem countP_cons_of_pos (l) (pa : p a) : countP p (a :: l) = countP p l + 1 := by
have : countP.go p (a :: l) 0 = countP.go p l 1 := show cond .. = _ by rw [pa]; rfl
unfold countP
rw [this, Nat.add_comm, List.countP_go_eq_add]
@[simp] theorem countP_cons_of_neg (l) (pa : ¬p a) : countP p (a :: l) = countP p l := by
simp [countP, countP.go, pa]
theorem countP_cons (a : α) (l) : countP p (a :: l) = countP p l + if p a then 1 else 0 := by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
theorem length_eq_countP_add_countP (l) : length l = countP p l + countP (fun a => ¬p a) l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons x h ih =>
if h : p x then
rw [countP_cons_of_pos _ _ h, countP_cons_of_neg _ _ _, length, ih]
· rw [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm _ 1, Nat.add_assoc]
· simp only [h, not_true_eq_false, decide_False, not_false_eq_true]
else
rw [countP_cons_of_pos (fun a => ¬p a) _ _, countP_cons_of_neg _ _ h, length, ih]
· rfl
· simp only [h, not_false_eq_true, decide_True]
theorem countP_eq_length_filter (l) : countP p l = length (filter p l) := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons x l ih =>
if h : p x
then rw [countP_cons_of_pos p l h, ih, filter_cons_of_pos l h, length]
else rw [countP_cons_of_neg p l h, ih, filter_cons_of_neg l h]
theorem countP_le_length : countP p l ≤ l.length := by
simp only [countP_eq_length_filter]
apply length_filter_le
@[simp] theorem countP_append (l₁ l₂) : countP p (l₁ ++ l₂) = countP p l₁ + countP p l₂ := by
simp only [countP_eq_length_filter, filter_append, length_append]
theorem countP_pos : 0 < countP p l ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a := by
simp only [countP_eq_length_filter, length_pos_iff_exists_mem, mem_filter, exists_prop]
theorem countP_eq_zero : countP p l = 0 ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, ¬p a := by
simp only [countP_eq_length_filter, length_eq_zero, filter_eq_nil]
theorem countP_eq_length : countP p l = l.length ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a := by
rw [countP_eq_length_filter, filter_length_eq_length]
theorem Sublist.countP_le (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : countP p l₁ ≤ countP p l₂ := by
simp only [countP_eq_length_filter]
apply s.filter _ |>.length_le
theorem countP_filter (l : List α) :
countP p (filter q l) = countP (fun a => p a ∧ q a) l := by
simp only [countP_eq_length_filter, filter_filter]
@[simp] theorem countP_true {l : List α} : (l.countP fun _ => true) = l.length := by
rw [countP_eq_length]
simp
@[simp] theorem countP_false {l : List α} : (l.countP fun _ => false) = 0 := by
rw [countP_eq_zero]
simp
@[simp] theorem countP_map (p : β → Bool) (f : α → β) :
∀ l, countP p (map f l) = countP (p ∘ f) l
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [map_cons, countP_cons, countP_cons, countP_map p f l]; rfl
variable {p q}
theorem countP_mono_left (h : ∀ x ∈ l, p x → q x) : countP p l ≤ countP q l := by
induction l with
| nil => apply Nat.le_refl
| cons a l ihl =>
rw [forall_mem_cons] at h
have ⟨ha, hl⟩ := h
simp [countP_cons]
cases h : p a
. simp
apply Nat.le_trans ?_ (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
apply ihl hl
. simp [ha h]
apply ihl hl
theorem countP_congr (h : ∀ x ∈ l, p x ↔ q x) : countP p l = countP q l :=
Nat.le_antisymm
(countP_mono_left fun x hx => (h x hx).1)
(countP_mono_left fun x hx => (h x hx).2)
end countP
/-! ### count -/
section count
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] theorem count_nil (a : α) : count a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem count_cons (a b : α) (l : List α) :
count a (b :: l) = count a l + if a = b then 1 else 0 := by
simp [count, countP_cons, eq_comm (a := a)]
@[simp] theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (l : List α) : count a (a :: l) = count a l + 1 := by
simp [count_cons]
@[simp] theorem count_cons_of_ne (h : a ≠ b) (l : List α) : count a (b :: l) = count a l := by
simp [count_cons, h]
theorem count_tail : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α) (h : l ≠ []),
l.tail.count a = l.count a - if a = l.head h then 1 else 0
| head :: tail, a, h => by simp [count_cons]
theorem count_le_length (a : α) (l : List α) : count a l ≤ l.length := countP_le_length _
theorem Sublist.count_le (h : l₁ <+ l₂) (a : α) : count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ := h.countP_le _
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (l : List α) : count a l ≤ count a (b :: l) :=
(sublist_cons _ _).count_le _
theorem count_singleton (a : α) : count a [a] = 1 := by simp
theorem count_singleton' (a b : α) : count a [b] = if a = b then 1 else 0 := by simp [count_cons]
@[simp] theorem count_append (a : α) : ∀ l₁ l₂, count a (l₁ ++ l₂) = count a l₁ + count a l₂ :=
countP_append _
theorem count_concat (a : α) (l : List α) : count a (concat l a) = succ (count a l) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem count_pos_iff_mem {a : α} {l : List α} : 0 < count a l ↔ a ∈ l := by
simp only [count, countP_pos, beq_iff_eq, exists_eq_right]
@[simp 900] theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∉ l) : count a l = 0 :=
Decidable.byContradiction fun h' => h <| count_pos_iff_mem.1 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
theorem not_mem_of_count_eq_zero {a : α} {l : List α} (h : count a l = 0) : a ∉ l :=
fun h' => Nat.ne_of_lt (count_pos_iff_mem.2 h') h.symm
theorem count_eq_zero {l : List α} : count a l = 0 ↔ a ∉ l :=
⟨not_mem_of_count_eq_zero, count_eq_zero_of_not_mem⟩
theorem count_eq_length {l : List α} : count a l = l.length ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, a = b := by
rw [count, countP_eq_length]
refine ⟨fun h b hb => Eq.symm ?_, fun h b hb => ?_⟩
· simpa using h b hb
· rw [h b hb, beq_self_eq_true]
@[simp] theorem count_replicate_self (a : α) (n : Nat) : count a (replicate n a) = n :=
(count_eq_length.2 <| fun _ h => (eq_of_mem_replicate h).symm).trans (length_replicate ..)
theorem count_replicate (a b : α) (n : Nat) : count a (replicate n b) = if a = b then n else 0 := by
split
exacts [‹a = b› ▸ count_replicate_self .., count_eq_zero.2 <| mt eq_of_mem_replicate ‹a ≠ b›]
theorem filter_beq (l : List α) (a : α) : l.filter (· == a) = replicate (count a l) a := by
simp only [count, countP_eq_length_filter, eq_replicate, mem_filter, beq_iff_eq]
exact ⟨trivial, fun _ h => h.2⟩
theorem filter_eq (l : List α) (a : α) : l.filter (· = a) = replicate (count a l) a :=
filter_beq l a
@[deprecated filter_eq]
theorem filter_eq' (l : List α) (a : α) : l.filter (a = ·) = replicate (count a l) a := by
simpa only [eq_comm] using filter_eq l a
@[deprecated filter_beq]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Count.lean | 204 | 205 | theorem filter_beq' (l : List α) (a : α) : l.filter (a == ·) = replicate (count a l) a := by |
simpa only [eq_comm (b := a)] using filter_eq l a
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Count
import Mathlib.Data.List.Dedup
import Mathlib.Data.List.InsertNth
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.List.Permutation
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
#align_import data.list.perm from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# List Permutations
This file introduces the `List.Perm` relation, which is true if two lists are permutations of one
another.
## Notation
The notation `~` is used for permutation equivalence.
-/
-- Make sure we don't import algebra
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Nat
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*} {l l₁ l₂ : List α} {a : α}
#align list.perm List.Perm
instance : Trans (@List.Perm α) (@List.Perm α) List.Perm where
trans := @List.Perm.trans α
open Perm (swap)
attribute [refl] Perm.refl
#align list.perm.refl List.Perm.refl
lemma perm_rfl : l ~ l := Perm.refl _
-- Porting note: used rec_on in mathlib3; lean4 eqn compiler still doesn't like it
attribute [symm] Perm.symm
#align list.perm.symm List.Perm.symm
#align list.perm_comm List.perm_comm
#align list.perm.swap' List.Perm.swap'
attribute [trans] Perm.trans
#align list.perm.eqv List.Perm.eqv
#align list.is_setoid List.isSetoid
#align list.perm.mem_iff List.Perm.mem_iff
#align list.perm.subset List.Perm.subset
theorem Perm.subset_congr_left {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ ↔ l₂ ⊆ l₃ :=
⟨h.symm.subset.trans, h.subset.trans⟩
#align list.perm.subset_congr_left List.Perm.subset_congr_left
theorem Perm.subset_congr_right {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₃ ⊆ l₁ ↔ l₃ ⊆ l₂ :=
⟨fun h' => h'.trans h.subset, fun h' => h'.trans h.symm.subset⟩
#align list.perm.subset_congr_right List.Perm.subset_congr_right
#align list.perm.append_right List.Perm.append_right
#align list.perm.append_left List.Perm.append_left
#align list.perm.append List.Perm.append
#align list.perm.append_cons List.Perm.append_cons
#align list.perm_middle List.perm_middle
#align list.perm_append_singleton List.perm_append_singleton
#align list.perm_append_comm List.perm_append_comm
#align list.concat_perm List.concat_perm
#align list.perm.length_eq List.Perm.length_eq
#align list.perm.eq_nil List.Perm.eq_nil
#align list.perm.nil_eq List.Perm.nil_eq
#align list.perm_nil List.perm_nil
#align list.nil_perm List.nil_perm
#align list.not_perm_nil_cons List.not_perm_nil_cons
#align list.reverse_perm List.reverse_perm
#align list.perm_cons_append_cons List.perm_cons_append_cons
#align list.perm_replicate List.perm_replicate
#align list.replicate_perm List.replicate_perm
#align list.perm_singleton List.perm_singleton
#align list.singleton_perm List.singleton_perm
#align list.singleton_perm_singleton List.singleton_perm_singleton
#align list.perm_cons_erase List.perm_cons_erase
#align list.perm_induction_on List.Perm.recOnSwap'
-- Porting note: used to be @[congr]
#align list.perm.filter_map List.Perm.filterMap
-- Porting note: used to be @[congr]
#align list.perm.map List.Perm.map
#align list.perm.pmap List.Perm.pmap
#align list.perm.filter List.Perm.filter
#align list.filter_append_perm List.filter_append_perm
#align list.exists_perm_sublist List.exists_perm_sublist
#align list.perm.sizeof_eq_sizeof List.Perm.sizeOf_eq_sizeOf
section Rel
open Relator
variable {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {r : α → β → Prop} {p : γ → δ → Prop}
local infixr:80 " ∘r " => Relation.Comp
theorem perm_comp_perm : (Perm ∘r Perm : List α → List α → Prop) = Perm := by
funext a c; apply propext
constructor
· exact fun ⟨b, hab, hba⟩ => Perm.trans hab hba
· exact fun h => ⟨a, Perm.refl a, h⟩
#align list.perm_comp_perm List.perm_comp_perm
| Mathlib/Data/List/Perm.lean | 149 | 164 | theorem perm_comp_forall₂ {l u v} (hlu : Perm l u) (huv : Forall₂ r u v) :
(Forall₂ r ∘r Perm) l v := by |
induction hlu generalizing v with
| nil => cases huv; exact ⟨[], Forall₂.nil, Perm.nil⟩
| cons u _hlu ih =>
cases' huv with _ b _ v hab huv'
rcases ih huv' with ⟨l₂, h₁₂, h₂₃⟩
exact ⟨b :: l₂, Forall₂.cons hab h₁₂, h₂₃.cons _⟩
| swap a₁ a₂ h₂₃ =>
cases' huv with _ b₁ _ l₂ h₁ hr₂₃
cases' hr₂₃ with _ b₂ _ l₂ h₂ h₁₂
exact ⟨b₂ :: b₁ :: l₂, Forall₂.cons h₂ (Forall₂.cons h₁ h₁₂), Perm.swap _ _ _⟩
| trans _ _ ih₁ ih₂ =>
rcases ih₂ huv with ⟨lb₂, hab₂, h₂₃⟩
rcases ih₁ hab₂ with ⟨lb₁, hab₁, h₁₂⟩
exact ⟨lb₁, hab₁, Perm.trans h₁₂ h₂₃⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.ULift
import Mathlib.Tactic.PushNeg
#align_import order.bounded_order from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70d50ecfd4900dd6d328da39ab7ebd516abe4025"
/-!
# ⊤ and ⊥, bounded lattices and variants
This file defines top and bottom elements (greatest and least elements) of a type, the bounded
variants of different kinds of lattices, sets up the typeclass hierarchy between them and provides
instances for `Prop` and `fun`.
## Main declarations
* `<Top/Bot> α`: Typeclasses to declare the `⊤`/`⊥` notation.
* `Order<Top/Bot> α`: Order with a top/bottom element.
* `BoundedOrder α`: Order with a top and bottom element.
## Common lattices
* Distributive lattices with a bottom element. Notated by `[DistribLattice α] [OrderBot α]`
It captures the properties of `Disjoint` that are common to `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` and
`DistribLattice` when `OrderBot`.
* Bounded and distributive lattice. Notated by `[DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α]`.
Typical examples include `Prop` and `Det α`.
-/
open Function OrderDual
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ δ : Type*}
/-! ### Top, bottom element -/
/-- An order is an `OrderTop` if it has a greatest element.
We state this using a data mixin, holding the value of `⊤` and the greatest element constraint. -/
class OrderTop (α : Type u) [LE α] extends Top α where
/-- `⊤` is the greatest element -/
le_top : ∀ a : α, a ≤ ⊤
#align order_top OrderTop
section OrderTop
/-- An order is (noncomputably) either an `OrderTop` or a `NoTopOrder`. Use as
`casesI topOrderOrNoTopOrder α`. -/
noncomputable def topOrderOrNoTopOrder (α : Type*) [LE α] : PSum (OrderTop α) (NoTopOrder α) := by
by_cases H : ∀ a : α, ∃ b, ¬b ≤ a
· exact PSum.inr ⟨H⟩
· push_neg at H
letI : Top α := ⟨Classical.choose H⟩
exact PSum.inl ⟨Classical.choose_spec H⟩
#align top_order_or_no_top_order topOrderOrNoTopOrder
section LE
variable [LE α] [OrderTop α] {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem le_top : a ≤ ⊤ :=
OrderTop.le_top a
#align le_top le_top
@[simp]
theorem isTop_top : IsTop (⊤ : α) := fun _ => le_top
#align is_top_top isTop_top
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [OrderTop α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem isMax_top : IsMax (⊤ : α) :=
isTop_top.isMax
#align is_max_top isMax_top
@[simp]
theorem not_top_lt : ¬⊤ < a :=
isMax_top.not_lt
#align not_top_lt not_top_lt
theorem ne_top_of_lt (h : a < b) : a ≠ ⊤ :=
(h.trans_le le_top).ne
#align ne_top_of_lt ne_top_of_lt
alias LT.lt.ne_top := ne_top_of_lt
end Preorder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem isMax_iff_eq_top : IsMax a ↔ a = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => h.eq_of_le le_top, fun h _ _ => h.symm ▸ le_top⟩
#align is_max_iff_eq_top isMax_iff_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem isTop_iff_eq_top : IsTop a ↔ a = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => h.isMax.eq_of_le le_top, fun h _ => h.symm ▸ le_top⟩
#align is_top_iff_eq_top isTop_iff_eq_top
theorem not_isMax_iff_ne_top : ¬IsMax a ↔ a ≠ ⊤ :=
isMax_iff_eq_top.not
#align not_is_max_iff_ne_top not_isMax_iff_ne_top
theorem not_isTop_iff_ne_top : ¬IsTop a ↔ a ≠ ⊤ :=
isTop_iff_eq_top.not
#align not_is_top_iff_ne_top not_isTop_iff_ne_top
alias ⟨IsMax.eq_top, _⟩ := isMax_iff_eq_top
#align is_max.eq_top IsMax.eq_top
alias ⟨IsTop.eq_top, _⟩ := isTop_iff_eq_top
#align is_top.eq_top IsTop.eq_top
@[simp]
theorem top_le_iff : ⊤ ≤ a ↔ a = ⊤ :=
le_top.le_iff_eq.trans eq_comm
#align top_le_iff top_le_iff
theorem top_unique (h : ⊤ ≤ a) : a = ⊤ :=
le_top.antisymm h
#align top_unique top_unique
theorem eq_top_iff : a = ⊤ ↔ ⊤ ≤ a :=
top_le_iff.symm
#align eq_top_iff eq_top_iff
theorem eq_top_mono (h : a ≤ b) (h₂ : a = ⊤) : b = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| h₂ ▸ h
#align eq_top_mono eq_top_mono
theorem lt_top_iff_ne_top : a < ⊤ ↔ a ≠ ⊤ :=
le_top.lt_iff_ne
#align lt_top_iff_ne_top lt_top_iff_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem not_lt_top_iff : ¬a < ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top.not_left
#align not_lt_top_iff not_lt_top_iff
theorem eq_top_or_lt_top (a : α) : a = ⊤ ∨ a < ⊤ :=
le_top.eq_or_lt
#align eq_top_or_lt_top eq_top_or_lt_top
theorem Ne.lt_top (h : a ≠ ⊤) : a < ⊤ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr h
#align ne.lt_top Ne.lt_top
theorem Ne.lt_top' (h : ⊤ ≠ a) : a < ⊤ :=
h.symm.lt_top
#align ne.lt_top' Ne.lt_top'
theorem ne_top_of_le_ne_top (hb : b ≠ ⊤) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≠ ⊤ :=
(hab.trans_lt hb.lt_top).ne
#align ne_top_of_le_ne_top ne_top_of_le_ne_top
theorem StrictMono.apply_eq_top_iff (hf : StrictMono f) : f a = f ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => not_lt_top_iff.1 fun ha => (hf ha).ne h, congr_arg _⟩
#align strict_mono.apply_eq_top_iff StrictMono.apply_eq_top_iff
theorem StrictAnti.apply_eq_top_iff (hf : StrictAnti f) : f a = f ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => not_lt_top_iff.1 fun ha => (hf ha).ne' h, congr_arg _⟩
#align strict_anti.apply_eq_top_iff StrictAnti.apply_eq_top_iff
variable [Nontrivial α]
theorem not_isMin_top : ¬IsMin (⊤ : α) := fun h =>
let ⟨_, ha⟩ := exists_ne (⊤ : α)
ha <| top_le_iff.1 <| h le_top
#align not_is_min_top not_isMin_top
end OrderTop
theorem StrictMono.maximal_preimage_top [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {f : α → β}
(H : StrictMono f) {a} (h_top : f a = ⊤) (x : α) : x ≤ a :=
H.maximal_of_maximal_image
(fun p => by
rw [h_top]
exact le_top)
x
#align strict_mono.maximal_preimage_top StrictMono.maximal_preimage_top
theorem OrderTop.ext_top {α} {hA : PartialOrder α} (A : OrderTop α) {hB : PartialOrder α}
(B : OrderTop α) (H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := hA; x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) :
(@Top.top α (@OrderTop.toTop α hA.toLE A)) = (@Top.top α (@OrderTop.toTop α hB.toLE B)) := by
cases PartialOrder.ext H
apply top_unique
exact @le_top _ _ A _
#align order_top.ext_top OrderTop.ext_top
/-- An order is an `OrderBot` if it has a least element.
We state this using a data mixin, holding the value of `⊥` and the least element constraint. -/
class OrderBot (α : Type u) [LE α] extends Bot α where
/-- `⊥` is the least element -/
bot_le : ∀ a : α, ⊥ ≤ a
#align order_bot OrderBot
section OrderBot
/-- An order is (noncomputably) either an `OrderBot` or a `NoBotOrder`. Use as
`casesI botOrderOrNoBotOrder α`. -/
noncomputable def botOrderOrNoBotOrder (α : Type*) [LE α] : PSum (OrderBot α) (NoBotOrder α) := by
by_cases H : ∀ a : α, ∃ b, ¬a ≤ b
· exact PSum.inr ⟨H⟩
· push_neg at H
letI : Bot α := ⟨Classical.choose H⟩
exact PSum.inl ⟨Classical.choose_spec H⟩
#align bot_order_or_no_bot_order botOrderOrNoBotOrder
section LE
variable [LE α] [OrderBot α] {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem bot_le : ⊥ ≤ a :=
OrderBot.bot_le a
#align bot_le bot_le
@[simp]
theorem isBot_bot : IsBot (⊥ : α) := fun _ => bot_le
#align is_bot_bot isBot_bot
end LE
namespace OrderDual
variable (α)
instance instTop [Bot α] : Top αᵒᵈ :=
⟨(⊥ : α)⟩
instance instBot [Top α] : Bot αᵒᵈ :=
⟨(⊤ : α)⟩
instance instOrderTop [LE α] [OrderBot α] : OrderTop αᵒᵈ where
__ := inferInstanceAs (Top αᵒᵈ)
le_top := @bot_le α _ _
instance instOrderBot [LE α] [OrderTop α] : OrderBot αᵒᵈ where
__ := inferInstanceAs (Bot αᵒᵈ)
bot_le := @le_top α _ _
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bot [Top α] : ofDual ⊥ = (⊤ : α) :=
rfl
#align order_dual.of_dual_bot OrderDual.ofDual_bot
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_top [Bot α] : ofDual ⊤ = (⊥ : α) :=
rfl
#align order_dual.of_dual_top OrderDual.ofDual_top
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bot [Bot α] : toDual (⊥ : α) = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align order_dual.to_dual_bot OrderDual.toDual_bot
@[simp]
theorem toDual_top [Top α] : toDual (⊤ : α) = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align order_dual.to_dual_top OrderDual.toDual_top
end OrderDual
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem isMin_bot : IsMin (⊥ : α) :=
isBot_bot.isMin
#align is_min_bot isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem not_lt_bot : ¬a < ⊥ :=
isMin_bot.not_lt
#align not_lt_bot not_lt_bot
theorem ne_bot_of_gt (h : a < b) : b ≠ ⊥ :=
(bot_le.trans_lt h).ne'
#align ne_bot_of_gt ne_bot_of_gt
alias LT.lt.ne_bot := ne_bot_of_gt
end Preorder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem isMin_iff_eq_bot : IsMin a ↔ a = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => h.eq_of_ge bot_le, fun h _ _ => h.symm ▸ bot_le⟩
#align is_min_iff_eq_bot isMin_iff_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem isBot_iff_eq_bot : IsBot a ↔ a = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => h.isMin.eq_of_ge bot_le, fun h _ => h.symm ▸ bot_le⟩
#align is_bot_iff_eq_bot isBot_iff_eq_bot
theorem not_isMin_iff_ne_bot : ¬IsMin a ↔ a ≠ ⊥ :=
isMin_iff_eq_bot.not
#align not_is_min_iff_ne_bot not_isMin_iff_ne_bot
theorem not_isBot_iff_ne_bot : ¬IsBot a ↔ a ≠ ⊥ :=
isBot_iff_eq_bot.not
#align not_is_bot_iff_ne_bot not_isBot_iff_ne_bot
alias ⟨IsMin.eq_bot, _⟩ := isMin_iff_eq_bot
#align is_min.eq_bot IsMin.eq_bot
alias ⟨IsBot.eq_bot, _⟩ := isBot_iff_eq_bot
#align is_bot.eq_bot IsBot.eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem le_bot_iff : a ≤ ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ :=
bot_le.le_iff_eq
#align le_bot_iff le_bot_iff
theorem bot_unique (h : a ≤ ⊥) : a = ⊥ :=
h.antisymm bot_le
#align bot_unique bot_unique
theorem eq_bot_iff : a = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.symm
#align eq_bot_iff eq_bot_iff
theorem eq_bot_mono (h : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b = ⊥) : a = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| h₂ ▸ h
#align eq_bot_mono eq_bot_mono
theorem bot_lt_iff_ne_bot : ⊥ < a ↔ a ≠ ⊥ :=
bot_le.lt_iff_ne.trans ne_comm
#align bot_lt_iff_ne_bot bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
@[simp]
theorem not_bot_lt_iff : ¬⊥ < a ↔ a = ⊥ :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.not_left
#align not_bot_lt_iff not_bot_lt_iff
theorem eq_bot_or_bot_lt (a : α) : a = ⊥ ∨ ⊥ < a :=
bot_le.eq_or_gt
#align eq_bot_or_bot_lt eq_bot_or_bot_lt
theorem eq_bot_of_minimal (h : ∀ b, ¬b < a) : a = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_or_bot_lt a).resolve_right (h ⊥)
#align eq_bot_of_minimal eq_bot_of_minimal
theorem Ne.bot_lt (h : a ≠ ⊥) : ⊥ < a :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr h
#align ne.bot_lt Ne.bot_lt
theorem Ne.bot_lt' (h : ⊥ ≠ a) : ⊥ < a :=
h.symm.bot_lt
#align ne.bot_lt' Ne.bot_lt'
theorem ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot (hb : b ≠ ⊥) (hab : b ≤ a) : a ≠ ⊥ :=
(hb.bot_lt.trans_le hab).ne'
#align ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot
theorem StrictMono.apply_eq_bot_iff (hf : StrictMono f) : f a = f ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ :=
hf.dual.apply_eq_top_iff
#align strict_mono.apply_eq_bot_iff StrictMono.apply_eq_bot_iff
theorem StrictAnti.apply_eq_bot_iff (hf : StrictAnti f) : f a = f ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ :=
hf.dual.apply_eq_top_iff
#align strict_anti.apply_eq_bot_iff StrictAnti.apply_eq_bot_iff
variable [Nontrivial α]
theorem not_isMax_bot : ¬IsMax (⊥ : α) :=
@not_isMin_top αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align not_is_max_bot not_isMax_bot
end OrderBot
theorem StrictMono.minimal_preimage_bot [LinearOrder α] [PartialOrder β] [OrderBot β] {f : α → β}
(H : StrictMono f) {a} (h_bot : f a = ⊥) (x : α) : a ≤ x :=
H.minimal_of_minimal_image
(fun p => by
rw [h_bot]
exact bot_le)
x
#align strict_mono.minimal_preimage_bot StrictMono.minimal_preimage_bot
theorem OrderBot.ext_bot {α} {hA : PartialOrder α} (A : OrderBot α) {hB : PartialOrder α}
(B : OrderBot α) (H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := hA; x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) :
(@Bot.bot α (@OrderBot.toBot α hA.toLE A)) = (@Bot.bot α (@OrderBot.toBot α hB.toLE B)) := by
cases PartialOrder.ext H
apply bot_unique
exact @bot_le _ _ A _
#align order_bot.ext_bot OrderBot.ext_bot
section SemilatticeSupTop
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderTop α] {a : α}
-- Porting note: Not simp because simp can prove it
theorem top_sup_eq (a : α) : ⊤ ⊔ a = ⊤ :=
sup_of_le_left le_top
#align top_sup_eq top_sup_eq
-- Porting note: Not simp because simp can prove it
theorem sup_top_eq (a : α) : a ⊔ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
sup_of_le_right le_top
#align sup_top_eq sup_top_eq
end SemilatticeSupTop
section SemilatticeSupBot
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] {a b : α}
-- Porting note: Not simp because simp can prove it
theorem bot_sup_eq (a : α) : ⊥ ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right bot_le
#align bot_sup_eq bot_sup_eq
-- Porting note: Not simp because simp can prove it
theorem sup_bot_eq (a : α) : a ⊔ ⊥ = a :=
sup_of_le_left bot_le
#align sup_bot_eq sup_bot_eq
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_bot_iff : a ⊔ b = ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ ∧ b = ⊥ := by rw [eq_bot_iff, sup_le_iff]; simp
#align sup_eq_bot_iff sup_eq_bot_iff
end SemilatticeSupBot
section SemilatticeInfTop
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderTop α] {a b : α}
-- Porting note: Not simp because simp can prove it
lemma top_inf_eq (a : α) : ⊤ ⊓ a = a := inf_of_le_right le_top
#align top_inf_eq top_inf_eq
-- Porting note: Not simp because simp can prove it
lemma inf_top_eq (a : α) : a ⊓ ⊤ = a := inf_of_le_left le_top
#align inf_top_eq inf_top_eq
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_top_iff : a ⊓ b = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∧ b = ⊤ :=
@sup_eq_bot_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align inf_eq_top_iff inf_eq_top_iff
end SemilatticeInfTop
section SemilatticeInfBot
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] {a : α}
-- Porting note: Not simp because simp can prove it
lemma bot_inf_eq (a : α) : ⊥ ⊓ a = ⊥ := inf_of_le_left bot_le
#align bot_inf_eq bot_inf_eq
-- Porting note: Not simp because simp can prove it
lemma inf_bot_eq (a : α) : a ⊓ ⊥ = ⊥ := inf_of_le_right bot_le
#align inf_bot_eq inf_bot_eq
end SemilatticeInfBot
/-! ### Bounded order -/
/-- A bounded order describes an order `(≤)` with a top and bottom element,
denoted `⊤` and `⊥` respectively. -/
class BoundedOrder (α : Type u) [LE α] extends OrderTop α, OrderBot α
#align bounded_order BoundedOrder
instance OrderDual.instBoundedOrder (α : Type u) [LE α] [BoundedOrder α] : BoundedOrder αᵒᵈ where
__ := inferInstanceAs (OrderTop αᵒᵈ)
__ := inferInstanceAs (OrderBot αᵒᵈ)
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
instance OrderBot.instSubsingleton : Subsingleton (OrderBot α) where
allEq := by rintro @⟨⟨a⟩, ha⟩ @⟨⟨b⟩, hb⟩; congr; exact le_antisymm (ha _) (hb _)
instance OrderTop.instSubsingleton : Subsingleton (OrderTop α) where
allEq := by rintro @⟨⟨a⟩, ha⟩ @⟨⟨b⟩, hb⟩; congr; exact le_antisymm (hb _) (ha _)
instance BoundedOrder.instSubsingleton : Subsingleton (BoundedOrder α) where
allEq := by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩; congr <;> exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
end PartialOrder
section Logic
/-!
#### In this section we prove some properties about monotone and antitone operations on `Prop`
-/
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
theorem monotone_and {p q : α → Prop} (m_p : Monotone p) (m_q : Monotone q) :
Monotone fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (m_p h) (m_q h)
#align monotone_and monotone_and
-- Note: by finish [monotone] doesn't work
theorem monotone_or {p q : α → Prop} (m_p : Monotone p) (m_q : Monotone q) :
Monotone fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (m_p h) (m_q h)
#align monotone_or monotone_or
theorem monotone_le {x : α} : Monotone (x ≤ ·) := fun _ _ h' h => h.trans h'
#align monotone_le monotone_le
theorem monotone_lt {x : α} : Monotone (x < ·) := fun _ _ h' h => h.trans_le h'
#align monotone_lt monotone_lt
theorem antitone_le {x : α} : Antitone (· ≤ x) := fun _ _ h' h => h'.trans h
#align antitone_le antitone_le
theorem antitone_lt {x : α} : Antitone (· < x) := fun _ _ h' h => h'.trans_lt h
#align antitone_lt antitone_lt
theorem Monotone.forall {P : β → α → Prop} (hP : ∀ x, Monotone (P x)) :
Monotone fun y => ∀ x, P x y :=
fun _ _ hy h x => hP x hy <| h x
#align monotone.forall Monotone.forall
theorem Antitone.forall {P : β → α → Prop} (hP : ∀ x, Antitone (P x)) :
Antitone fun y => ∀ x, P x y :=
fun _ _ hy h x => hP x hy (h x)
#align antitone.forall Antitone.forall
theorem Monotone.ball {P : β → α → Prop} {s : Set β} (hP : ∀ x ∈ s, Monotone (P x)) :
Monotone fun y => ∀ x ∈ s, P x y := fun _ _ hy h x hx => hP x hx hy (h x hx)
#align monotone.ball Monotone.ball
theorem Antitone.ball {P : β → α → Prop} {s : Set β} (hP : ∀ x ∈ s, Antitone (P x)) :
Antitone fun y => ∀ x ∈ s, P x y := fun _ _ hy h x hx => hP x hx hy (h x hx)
#align antitone.ball Antitone.ball
theorem Monotone.exists {P : β → α → Prop} (hP : ∀ x, Monotone (P x)) :
Monotone fun y => ∃ x, P x y :=
fun _ _ hy ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, hP x hy hx⟩
theorem Antitone.exists {P : β → α → Prop} (hP : ∀ x, Antitone (P x)) :
Antitone fun y => ∃ x, P x y :=
fun _ _ hy ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, hP x hy hx⟩
theorem forall_ge_iff {P : α → Prop} {x₀ : α} (hP : Monotone P) :
(∀ x ≥ x₀, P x) ↔ P x₀ :=
⟨fun H ↦ H x₀ le_rfl, fun H _ hx ↦ hP hx H⟩
theorem forall_le_iff {P : α → Prop} {x₀ : α} (hP : Antitone P) :
(∀ x ≤ x₀, P x) ↔ P x₀ :=
⟨fun H ↦ H x₀ le_rfl, fun H _ hx ↦ hP hx H⟩
end Preorder
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α]
theorem exists_ge_and_iff_exists {P : α → Prop} {x₀ : α} (hP : Monotone P) :
(∃ x, x₀ ≤ x ∧ P x) ↔ ∃ x, P x :=
⟨fun h => h.imp fun _ h => h.2, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x ⊔ x₀, le_sup_right, hP le_sup_left hx⟩⟩
#align exists_ge_and_iff_exists exists_ge_and_iff_exists
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α]
theorem exists_le_and_iff_exists {P : α → Prop} {x₀ : α} (hP : Antitone P) :
(∃ x, x ≤ x₀ ∧ P x) ↔ ∃ x, P x :=
exists_ge_and_iff_exists <| hP.dual_left
#align exists_le_and_iff_exists exists_le_and_iff_exists
end SemilatticeInf
end Logic
/-! ### Function lattices -/
namespace Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {α' : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, Bot (α' i)] : Bot (∀ i, α' i) :=
⟨fun _ => ⊥⟩
@[simp]
theorem bot_apply [∀ i, Bot (α' i)] (i : ι) : (⊥ : ∀ i, α' i) i = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align pi.bot_apply Pi.bot_apply
theorem bot_def [∀ i, Bot (α' i)] : (⊥ : ∀ i, α' i) = fun _ => ⊥ :=
rfl
#align pi.bot_def Pi.bot_def
instance [∀ i, Top (α' i)] : Top (∀ i, α' i) :=
⟨fun _ => ⊤⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_apply [∀ i, Top (α' i)] (i : ι) : (⊤ : ∀ i, α' i) i = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align pi.top_apply Pi.top_apply
theorem top_def [∀ i, Top (α' i)] : (⊤ : ∀ i, α' i) = fun _ => ⊤ :=
rfl
#align pi.top_def Pi.top_def
instance instOrderTop [∀ i, LE (α' i)] [∀ i, OrderTop (α' i)] : OrderTop (∀ i, α' i) where
le_top _ := fun _ => le_top
instance instOrderBot [∀ i, LE (α' i)] [∀ i, OrderBot (α' i)] : OrderBot (∀ i, α' i) where
bot_le _ := fun _ => bot_le
instance instBoundedOrder [∀ i, LE (α' i)] [∀ i, BoundedOrder (α' i)] :
BoundedOrder (∀ i, α' i) where
__ := inferInstanceAs (OrderTop (∀ i, α' i))
__ := inferInstanceAs (OrderBot (∀ i, α' i))
end Pi
section Subsingleton
variable [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α]
theorem eq_bot_of_bot_eq_top (hα : (⊥ : α) = ⊤) (x : α) : x = (⊥ : α) :=
eq_bot_mono le_top (Eq.symm hα)
#align eq_bot_of_bot_eq_top eq_bot_of_bot_eq_top
theorem eq_top_of_bot_eq_top (hα : (⊥ : α) = ⊤) (x : α) : x = (⊤ : α) :=
eq_top_mono bot_le hα
#align eq_top_of_bot_eq_top eq_top_of_bot_eq_top
theorem subsingleton_of_top_le_bot (h : (⊤ : α) ≤ (⊥ : α)) : Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun _ _ => le_antisymm
(le_trans le_top <| le_trans h bot_le) (le_trans le_top <| le_trans h bot_le)⟩
#align subsingleton_of_top_le_bot subsingleton_of_top_le_bot
theorem subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top (hα : (⊥ : α) = (⊤ : α)) : Subsingleton α :=
subsingleton_of_top_le_bot (ge_of_eq hα)
#align subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top
theorem subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top : (⊥ : α) = (⊤ : α) ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top, fun _ => Subsingleton.elim ⊥ ⊤⟩
#align subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top
end Subsingleton
section lift
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback an `OrderTop`. -/
abbrev OrderTop.lift [LE α] [Top α] [LE β] [OrderTop β] (f : α → β)
(map_le : ∀ a b, f a ≤ f b → a ≤ b) (map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) : OrderTop α :=
⟨fun a =>
map_le _ _ <| by
rw [map_top]
-- Porting note: lean3 didn't need the type annotation
exact @le_top β _ _ _⟩
#align order_top.lift OrderTop.lift
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback an `OrderBot`. -/
abbrev OrderBot.lift [LE α] [Bot α] [LE β] [OrderBot β] (f : α → β)
(map_le : ∀ a b, f a ≤ f b → a ≤ b) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) : OrderBot α :=
⟨fun a =>
map_le _ _ <| by
rw [map_bot]
-- Porting note: lean3 didn't need the type annotation
exact @bot_le β _ _ _⟩
#align order_bot.lift OrderBot.lift
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback a `BoundedOrder`. -/
abbrev BoundedOrder.lift [LE α] [Top α] [Bot α] [LE β] [BoundedOrder β] (f : α → β)
(map_le : ∀ a b, f a ≤ f b → a ≤ b) (map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) :
BoundedOrder α where
__ := OrderTop.lift f map_le map_top
__ := OrderBot.lift f map_le map_bot
#align bounded_order.lift BoundedOrder.lift
end lift
/-! ### Subtype, order dual, product lattices -/
namespace Subtype
variable {p : α → Prop}
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A subtype remains a `⊥`-order if the property holds at `⊥`. -/
protected abbrev orderBot [LE α] [OrderBot α] (hbot : p ⊥) : OrderBot { x : α // p x } where
bot := ⟨⊥, hbot⟩
bot_le _ := bot_le
#align subtype.order_bot Subtype.orderBot
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A subtype remains a `⊤`-order if the property holds at `⊤`. -/
protected abbrev orderTop [LE α] [OrderTop α] (htop : p ⊤) : OrderTop { x : α // p x } where
top := ⟨⊤, htop⟩
le_top _ := le_top
#align subtype.order_top Subtype.orderTop
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A subtype remains a bounded order if the property holds at `⊥` and `⊤`. -/
protected abbrev boundedOrder [LE α] [BoundedOrder α] (hbot : p ⊥) (htop : p ⊤) :
BoundedOrder (Subtype p) where
__ := Subtype.orderTop htop
__ := Subtype.orderBot hbot
#align subtype.bounded_order Subtype.boundedOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem mk_bot [OrderBot α] [OrderBot (Subtype p)] (hbot : p ⊥) : mk ⊥ hbot = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| coe_le_coe.1 bot_le
#align subtype.mk_bot Subtype.mk_bot
@[simp]
theorem mk_top [OrderTop α] [OrderTop (Subtype p)] (htop : p ⊤) : mk ⊤ htop = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| coe_le_coe.1 le_top
#align subtype.mk_top Subtype.mk_top
theorem coe_bot [OrderBot α] [OrderBot (Subtype p)] (hbot : p ⊥) : ((⊥ : Subtype p) : α) = ⊥ :=
congr_arg Subtype.val (mk_bot hbot).symm
#align subtype.coe_bot Subtype.coe_bot
theorem coe_top [OrderTop α] [OrderTop (Subtype p)] (htop : p ⊤) : ((⊤ : Subtype p) : α) = ⊤ :=
congr_arg Subtype.val (mk_top htop).symm
#align subtype.coe_top Subtype.coe_top
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/BoundedOrder.lean | 746 | 748 | theorem coe_eq_bot_iff [OrderBot α] [OrderBot (Subtype p)] (hbot : p ⊥) {x : { x // p x }} :
(x : α) = ⊥ ↔ x = ⊥ := by |
rw [← coe_bot hbot, ext_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Thickening
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
#align_import analysis.normed.group.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c8f305514e0d47dfaa710f5a52f0d21b588e6328"
/-!
# Properties of pointwise addition of sets in normed groups
We explore the relationships between pointwise addition of sets in normed groups, and the norm.
Notably, we show that the sum of bounded sets remain bounded.
-/
open Metric Set Pointwise Topology
variable {E : Type*}
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] {ε δ : ℝ} {s t : Set E} {x y : E}
-- note: we can't use `LipschitzOnWith.isBounded_image2` here without adding `[IsometricSMul E E]`
@[to_additive]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.mul (hs : IsBounded s) (ht : IsBounded t) : IsBounded (s * t) := by
obtain ⟨Rs, hRs⟩ : ∃ R, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ R := hs.exists_norm_le'
obtain ⟨Rt, hRt⟩ : ∃ R, ∀ x ∈ t, ‖x‖ ≤ R := ht.exists_norm_le'
refine isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'.2 ⟨Rs + Rt, ?_⟩
rintro z ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩
exact norm_mul_le_of_le (hRs x hx) (hRt y hy)
#align metric.bounded.mul Bornology.IsBounded.mul
#align metric.bounded.add Bornology.IsBounded.add
@[to_additive]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.of_mul (hst : IsBounded (s * t)) : IsBounded s ∨ IsBounded t :=
AntilipschitzWith.isBounded_of_image2_left _ (fun x => (isometry_mul_right x).antilipschitz) hst
#align metric.bounded.of_mul Bornology.IsBounded.of_mul
#align metric.bounded.of_add Bornology.IsBounded.of_add
@[to_additive]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.inv : IsBounded s → IsBounded s⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le', ← image_inv, forall_mem_image, norm_inv']
exact id
#align metric.bounded.inv Bornology.IsBounded.inv
#align metric.bounded.neg Bornology.IsBounded.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.div (hs : IsBounded s) (ht : IsBounded t) : IsBounded (s / t) :=
div_eq_mul_inv s t ▸ hs.mul ht.inv
#align metric.bounded.div Bornology.IsBounded.div
#align metric.bounded.sub Bornology.IsBounded.sub
end SeminormedGroup
section SeminormedCommGroup
variable [SeminormedCommGroup E] {ε δ : ℝ} {s t : Set E} {x y : E}
section EMetric
open EMetric
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem infEdist_inv_inv (x : E) (s : Set E) : infEdist x⁻¹ s⁻¹ = infEdist x s := by
rw [← image_inv, infEdist_image isometry_inv]
#align inf_edist_inv_inv infEdist_inv_inv
#align inf_edist_neg_neg infEdist_neg_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem infEdist_inv (x : E) (s : Set E) : infEdist x⁻¹ s = infEdist x s⁻¹ := by
rw [← infEdist_inv_inv, inv_inv]
#align inf_edist_inv infEdist_inv
#align inf_edist_neg infEdist_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ediam_mul_le (x y : Set E) : EMetric.diam (x * y) ≤ EMetric.diam x + EMetric.diam y :=
(LipschitzOnWith.ediam_image2_le (· * ·) _ _
(fun _ _ => (isometry_mul_right _).lipschitz.lipschitzOnWith _) fun _ _ =>
(isometry_mul_left _).lipschitz.lipschitzOnWith _).trans_eq <|
by simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
#align ediam_mul_le ediam_mul_le
#align ediam_add_le ediam_add_le
end EMetric
variable (ε δ s t x y)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Pointwise.lean | 94 | 96 | theorem inv_thickening : (thickening δ s)⁻¹ = thickening δ s⁻¹ := by |
simp_rw [thickening, ← infEdist_inv]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Dynamics.FixedPoints.Basic
/-!
# Birkhoff sums
In this file we define `birkhoffSum f g n x` to be the sum `∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, g (f^[k] x)`.
This sum (more precisely, the corresponding average `n⁻¹ • birkhoffSum f g n x`)
appears in various ergodic theorems
saying that these averages converge to the "space average" `⨍ x, g x ∂μ` in some sense.
See also `birkhoffAverage` defined in `Dynamics/BirkhoffSum/Average`.
-/
open Finset Function
section AddCommMonoid
variable {α M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M]
/-- The sum of values of `g` on the first `n` points of the orbit of `x` under `f`. -/
def birkhoffSum (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (n : ℕ) (x : α) : M := ∑ k ∈ range n, g (f^[k] x)
theorem birkhoffSum_zero (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (x : α) : birkhoffSum f g 0 x = 0 :=
sum_range_zero _
@[simp]
theorem birkhoffSum_zero' (f : α → α) (g : α → M) : birkhoffSum f g 0 = 0 :=
funext <| birkhoffSum_zero _ _
theorem birkhoffSum_one (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (x : α) : birkhoffSum f g 1 x = g x :=
sum_range_one _
@[simp]
theorem birkhoffSum_one' (f : α → α) (g : α → M) : birkhoffSum f g 1 = g :=
funext <| birkhoffSum_one f g
theorem birkhoffSum_succ (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
birkhoffSum f g (n + 1) x = birkhoffSum f g n x + g (f^[n] x) :=
sum_range_succ _ _
theorem birkhoffSum_succ' (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
birkhoffSum f g (n + 1) x = g x + birkhoffSum f g n (f x) :=
(sum_range_succ' _ _).trans (add_comm _ _)
| Mathlib/Dynamics/BirkhoffSum/Basic.lean | 51 | 53 | theorem birkhoffSum_add (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (m n : ℕ) (x : α) :
birkhoffSum f g (m + n) x = birkhoffSum f g m x + birkhoffSum f g n (f^[m] x) := by |
simp_rw [birkhoffSum, sum_range_add, add_comm m, iterate_add_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.Array.Lemmas
import Batteries.Tactic.Lint.Misc
namespace Batteries
/-- Union-find node type -/
structure UFNode where
/-- Parent of node -/
parent : Nat
/-- Rank of node -/
rank : Nat
namespace UnionFind
/-- Panic with return value -/
def panicWith (v : α) (msg : String) : α := @panic α ⟨v⟩ msg
@[simp] theorem panicWith_eq (v : α) (msg) : panicWith v msg = v := rfl
/-- Parent of a union-find node, defaults to self when the node is a root -/
def parentD (arr : Array UFNode) (i : Nat) : Nat :=
if h : i < arr.size then (arr.get ⟨i, h⟩).parent else i
/-- Rank of a union-find node, defaults to 0 when the node is a root -/
def rankD (arr : Array UFNode) (i : Nat) : Nat :=
if h : i < arr.size then (arr.get ⟨i, h⟩).rank else 0
theorem parentD_eq {arr : Array UFNode} {i} : parentD arr i.1 = (arr.get i).parent := dif_pos _
theorem parentD_eq' {arr : Array UFNode} {i} (h) :
parentD arr i = (arr.get ⟨i, h⟩).parent := dif_pos _
theorem rankD_eq {arr : Array UFNode} {i} : rankD arr i.1 = (arr.get i).rank := dif_pos _
theorem rankD_eq' {arr : Array UFNode} {i} (h) : rankD arr i = (arr.get ⟨i, h⟩).rank := dif_pos _
theorem parentD_of_not_lt : ¬i < arr.size → parentD arr i = i := (dif_neg ·)
theorem lt_of_parentD : parentD arr i ≠ i → i < arr.size :=
Decidable.not_imp_comm.1 parentD_of_not_lt
theorem parentD_set {arr : Array UFNode} {x v i} :
parentD (arr.set x v) i = if x.1 = i then v.parent else parentD arr i := by
rw [parentD]; simp [Array.get_eq_getElem, parentD]
split <;> [split <;> simp [Array.get_set, *]; split <;> [(subst i; cases ‹¬_› x.2); rfl]]
theorem rankD_set {arr : Array UFNode} {x v i} :
rankD (arr.set x v) i = if x.1 = i then v.rank else rankD arr i := by
rw [rankD]; simp [Array.get_eq_getElem, rankD]
split <;> [split <;> simp [Array.get_set, *]; split <;> [(subst i; cases ‹¬_› x.2); rfl]]
end UnionFind
open UnionFind
/-- ### Union-find data structure
The `UnionFind` structure is an implementation of disjoint-set data structure
that uses path compression to make the primary operations run in amortized
nearly linear time. The nodes of a `UnionFind` structure `s` are natural
numbers smaller than `s.size`. The structure associates with a canonical
representative from its equivalence class. The structure can be extended
using the `push` operation and equivalence classes can be updated using the
`union` operation.
The main operations for `UnionFind` are:
* `empty`/`mkEmpty` are used to create a new empty structure.
* `size` returns the size of the data structure.
* `push` adds a new node to a structure, unlinked to any other node.
* `union` links two nodes of the data structure, joining their equivalence
classes, and performs path compression.
* `find` returns the canonical representative of a node and updates the data
structure using path compression.
* `root` returns the canonical representative of a node without altering the
data structure.
* `checkEquiv` checks whether two nodes have the same canonical representative
and updates the structure using path compression.
Most use cases should prefer `find` over `root` to benefit from the speedup from path-compression.
The main operations use `Fin s.size` to represent nodes of the union-find structure.
Some alternatives are provided:
* `unionN`, `findN`, `rootN`, `checkEquivN` use `Fin n` with a proof that `n = s.size`.
* `union!`, `find!`, `root!`, `checkEquiv!` use `Nat` and panic when the indices are out of bounds.
* `findD`, `rootD`, `checkEquivD` use `Nat` and treat out of bound indices as isolated nodes.
The noncomputable relation `UnionFind.Equiv` is provided to use the equivalence relation from a
`UnionFind` structure in the context of proofs.
-/
structure UnionFind where
/-- Array of union-find nodes -/
arr : Array UFNode
/-- Validity for parent nodes -/
parentD_lt : ∀ {i}, i < arr.size → parentD arr i < arr.size
/-- Validity for rank -/
rankD_lt : ∀ {i}, parentD arr i ≠ i → rankD arr i < rankD arr (parentD arr i)
namespace UnionFind
/-- Size of union-find structure. -/
@[inline] abbrev size (self : UnionFind) := self.arr.size
/-- Create an empty union-find structure with specific capacity -/
def mkEmpty (c : Nat) : UnionFind where
arr := Array.mkEmpty c
parentD_lt := nofun
rankD_lt := nofun
/-- Empty union-find structure -/
def empty := mkEmpty 0
instance : EmptyCollection UnionFind := ⟨.empty⟩
/-- Parent of union-find node -/
abbrev parent (self : UnionFind) (i : Nat) : Nat := parentD self.arr i
theorem parent'_lt (self : UnionFind) (i : Fin self.size) :
(self.arr.get i).parent < self.size := by
simp only [← parentD_eq, parentD_lt, Fin.is_lt, Array.data_length]
theorem parent_lt (self : UnionFind) (i : Nat) : self.parent i < self.size ↔ i < self.size := by
simp only [parentD]; split <;> simp only [*, parent'_lt]
/-- Rank of union-find node -/
abbrev rank (self : UnionFind) (i : Nat) : Nat := rankD self.arr i
theorem rank_lt {self : UnionFind} {i : Nat} : self.parent i ≠ i →
self.rank i < self.rank (self.parent i) := by simpa only [rank] using self.rankD_lt
theorem rank'_lt (self : UnionFind) (i : Fin self.size) : (self.arr.get i).parent ≠ i →
self.rank i < self.rank (self.arr.get i).parent := by
simpa only [← parentD_eq] using self.rankD_lt
/-- Maximum rank of nodes in a union-find structure -/
noncomputable def rankMax (self : UnionFind) := self.arr.foldr (max ·.rank) 0 + 1
theorem rank'_lt_rankMax (self : UnionFind) (i : Fin self.size) :
(self.arr.get i).rank < self.rankMax := by
let rec go : ∀ {l} {x : UFNode}, x ∈ l → x.rank ≤ List.foldr (max ·.rank) 0 l
| a::l, _, List.Mem.head _ => by dsimp; apply Nat.le_max_left
| a::l, _, .tail _ h => by dsimp; exact Nat.le_trans (go h) (Nat.le_max_right ..)
simp [rankMax, Array.foldr_eq_foldr_data]
exact Nat.lt_succ.2 <| go (self.arr.data.get_mem i.1 i.2)
theorem rankD_lt_rankMax (self : UnionFind) (i : Nat) :
rankD self.arr i < self.rankMax := by
simp [rankD]; split <;> [apply rank'_lt_rankMax; apply Nat.succ_pos]
theorem lt_rankMax (self : UnionFind) (i : Nat) : self.rank i < self.rankMax := rankD_lt_rankMax ..
theorem push_rankD (arr : Array UFNode) : rankD (arr.push ⟨arr.size, 0⟩) i = rankD arr i := by
simp [rankD, Array.get_eq_getElem, Array.get_push]
split <;> split <;> first | simp | cases ‹¬_› (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt ‹_›)
theorem push_parentD (arr : Array UFNode) : parentD (arr.push ⟨arr.size, 0⟩) i = parentD arr i := by
simp [parentD, Array.get_eq_getElem, Array.get_push]
split <;> split <;> try simp
· exact Nat.le_antisymm (Nat.ge_of_not_lt ‹_›) (Nat.le_of_lt_succ ‹_›)
· cases ‹¬_› (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt ‹_›)
/-- Add a new node to a union-find structure, unlinked with any other nodes -/
def push (self : UnionFind) : UnionFind where
arr := self.arr.push ⟨self.arr.size, 0⟩
parentD_lt {i} := by
simp [push_parentD]; simp [parentD]
split <;> [exact fun _ => Nat.lt_succ_of_lt (self.parent'_lt _); exact id]
rankD_lt := by simp [push_parentD, push_rankD]; exact self.rank_lt
/-- Root of a union-find node. -/
def root (self : UnionFind) (x : Fin self.size) : Fin self.size :=
let y := (self.arr.get x).parent
if h : y = x then
x
else
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (self.lt_rankMax x) (self.rank'_lt _ h)
self.root ⟨y, self.parent'_lt x⟩
termination_by self.rankMax - self.rank x
@[inherit_doc root]
def rootN (self : UnionFind) (x : Fin n) (h : n = self.size) : Fin n :=
match n, h with | _, rfl => self.root x
/-- Root of a union-find node. Panics if index is out of bounds. -/
def root! (self : UnionFind) (x : Nat) : Nat :=
if h : x < self.size then self.root ⟨x, h⟩ else panicWith x "index out of bounds"
/-- Root of a union-find node. Returns input if index is out of bounds. -/
def rootD (self : UnionFind) (x : Nat) : Nat :=
if h : x < self.size then self.root ⟨x, h⟩ else x
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem parent_root (self : UnionFind) (x : Fin self.size) :
(self.arr.get (self.root x)).parent = self.root x := by
rw [root]; split <;> [assumption; skip]
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (self.lt_rankMax x) (self.rank'_lt _ ‹_›)
apply parent_root
termination_by self.rankMax - self.rank x
theorem parent_rootD (self : UnionFind) (x : Nat) :
self.parent (self.rootD x) = self.rootD x := by
rw [rootD]; split <;>
[simp [parentD, parent_root, -Array.get_eq_getElem]; simp [parentD_of_not_lt, *]]
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem rootD_parent (self : UnionFind) (x : Nat) : self.rootD (self.parent x) = self.rootD x := by
simp [rootD, parent_lt]; split <;> simp [parentD, parentD_of_not_lt, *, -Array.get_eq_getElem]
(conv => rhs; rw [root]); split
· rw [root, dif_pos] <;> simp [*, -Array.get_eq_getElem]
· simp
theorem rootD_lt {self : UnionFind} {x : Nat} : self.rootD x < self.size ↔ x < self.size := by
simp [rootD]; split <;> simp [*]
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem rootD_eq_self {self : UnionFind} {x : Nat} : self.rootD x = x ↔ self.parent x = x := by
refine ⟨fun h => by rw [← h, parent_rootD], fun h => ?_⟩
rw [rootD]; split <;> [rw [root, dif_pos (by rwa [parent, parentD_eq' ‹_›] at h)]; rfl]
theorem rootD_rootD {self : UnionFind} {x : Nat} : self.rootD (self.rootD x) = self.rootD x :=
rootD_eq_self.2 (parent_rootD ..)
theorem rootD_ext {m1 m2 : UnionFind}
(H : ∀ x, m1.parent x = m2.parent x) {x} : m1.rootD x = m2.rootD x := by
if h : m2.parent x = x then
rw [rootD_eq_self.2 h, rootD_eq_self.2 ((H _).trans h)]
else
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (m2.lt_rankMax x) (m2.rank_lt h)
rw [← rootD_parent, H, rootD_ext H, rootD_parent]
termination_by m2.rankMax - m2.rank x
theorem le_rank_root {self : UnionFind} {x : Nat} : self.rank x ≤ self.rank (self.rootD x) := by
if h : self.parent x = x then
rw [rootD_eq_self.2 h]; exact Nat.le_refl ..
else
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (self.lt_rankMax x) (self.rank_lt h)
rw [← rootD_parent]
exact Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_of_lt (self.rank_lt h)) le_rank_root
termination_by self.rankMax - self.rank x
theorem lt_rank_root {self : UnionFind} {x : Nat} :
self.rank x < self.rank (self.rootD x) ↔ self.parent x ≠ x := by
refine ⟨fun h h' => Nat.ne_of_lt h (by rw [rootD_eq_self.2 h']), fun h => ?_⟩
rw [← rootD_parent]
exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (self.rank_lt h) le_rank_root
/-- Auxiliary data structure for find operation -/
structure FindAux (n : Nat) where
/-- Array of nodes -/
s : Array UFNode
/-- Index of root node -/
root : Fin n
/-- Size requirement -/
size_eq : s.size = n
/-- Auxiliary function for find operation -/
def findAux (self : UnionFind) (x : Fin self.size) : FindAux self.size :=
let y := (self.arr.get x).parent
if h : y = x then
⟨self.arr, x, rfl⟩
else
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (self.lt_rankMax x) (self.rank'_lt _ h)
let ⟨arr₁, root, H⟩ := self.findAux ⟨y, self.parent'_lt x⟩
⟨arr₁.modify x fun s => { s with parent := root }, root, by simp [H]⟩
termination_by self.rankMax - self.rank x
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem findAux_root {self : UnionFind} {x : Fin self.size} :
(findAux self x).root = self.root x := by
rw [findAux, root]; simp; split <;> simp
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (self.lt_rankMax x) (self.rank'_lt _ ‹_›)
exact findAux_root
termination_by self.rankMax - self.rank x
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem findAux_s {self : UnionFind} {x : Fin self.size} :
(findAux self x).s = if (self.arr.get x).parent = x then self.arr else
(self.findAux ⟨_, self.parent'_lt x⟩).s.modify x fun s =>
{ s with parent := self.rootD x } := by
rw [show self.rootD _ = (self.findAux ⟨_, self.parent'_lt x⟩).root from _]
· rw [findAux]; split <;> rfl
· rw [← rootD_parent, parent, parentD_eq]
simp [findAux_root, rootD]
apply dif_pos
exact parent'_lt ..
theorem rankD_findAux {self : UnionFind} {x : Fin self.size} :
rankD (findAux self x).s i = self.rank i := by
if h : i < self.size then
rw [findAux_s]; split <;> [rfl; skip]
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (self.lt_rankMax x) (self.rank'_lt _ ‹_›)
have := lt_of_parentD (by rwa [parentD_eq])
rw [rankD_eq' (by simp [FindAux.size_eq, h]), Array.get_modify (by rwa [FindAux.size_eq])]
split <;> simp [← rankD_eq, rankD_findAux (x := ⟨_, self.parent'_lt x⟩), -Array.get_eq_getElem]
else
simp [rank, rankD]; rw [dif_neg (by rwa [FindAux.size_eq]), dif_neg h]
termination_by self.rankMax - self.rank x
theorem parentD_findAux {self : UnionFind} {x : Fin self.size} :
parentD (findAux self x).s i =
if i = x then self.rootD x else parentD (self.findAux ⟨_, self.parent'_lt x⟩).s i := by
rw [findAux_s]; split <;> [split; skip]
· subst i; rw [rootD_eq_self.2 _] <;> simp [parentD_eq, *, -Array.get_eq_getElem]
· rw [findAux_s]; simp [*, -Array.get_eq_getElem]
· next h =>
rw [parentD]; split <;> rename_i h'
· rw [Array.get_modify (by simpa using h')]
simp [@eq_comm _ i, -Array.get_eq_getElem]
split <;> simp [← parentD_eq, -Array.get_eq_getElem]
· rw [if_neg (mt (by rintro rfl; simp [FindAux.size_eq]) h')]
rw [parentD, dif_neg]; simpa using h'
theorem parentD_findAux_rootD {self : UnionFind} {x : Fin self.size} :
parentD (findAux self x).s (self.rootD x) = self.rootD x := by
rw [parentD_findAux]; split <;> [rfl; rename_i h]
rw [rootD_eq_self, parent, parentD_eq] at h
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (self.lt_rankMax x) (self.rank'_lt _ ‹_›)
rw [← rootD_parent, parent, parentD_eq]
exact parentD_findAux_rootD (x := ⟨_, self.parent'_lt x⟩)
termination_by self.rankMax - self.rank x
theorem parentD_findAux_lt {self : UnionFind} {x : Fin self.size} (h : i < self.size) :
parentD (findAux self x).s i < self.size := by
if h' : (self.arr.get x).parent = x then
rw [findAux_s, if_pos h']; apply self.parentD_lt h
else
rw [parentD_findAux]; split <;> [simp [rootD_lt]; skip]
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (self.lt_rankMax x) (self.rank'_lt _ ‹_›)
apply parentD_findAux_lt h
termination_by self.rankMax - self.rank x
theorem parentD_findAux_or (self : UnionFind) (x : Fin self.size) (i) :
parentD (findAux self x).s i = self.rootD i ∧ self.rootD i = self.rootD x ∨
parentD (findAux self x).s i = self.parent i := by
if h' : (self.arr.get x).parent = x then
rw [findAux_s, if_pos h']; exact .inr rfl
else
rw [parentD_findAux]; split <;> [simp [*]; skip]
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (self.lt_rankMax x) (self.rank'_lt _ ‹_›)
exact (parentD_findAux_or self ⟨_, self.parent'_lt x⟩ i).imp_left <| .imp_right fun h => by
simp only [h, ← parentD_eq, rootD_parent, Array.data_length]
termination_by self.rankMax - self.rank x
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/UnionFind/Basic.lean | 350 | 360 | theorem lt_rankD_findAux {self : UnionFind} {x : Fin self.size} :
parentD (findAux self x).s i ≠ i →
self.rank i < self.rank (parentD (findAux self x).s i) := by |
if h' : (self.arr.get x).parent = x then
rw [findAux_s, if_pos h']; apply self.rank_lt
else
rw [parentD_findAux]; split <;> rename_i h <;> intro h'
· subst i; rwa [lt_rank_root, Ne, ← rootD_eq_self]
· have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (self.lt_rankMax x) (self.rank'_lt _ ‹_›)
apply lt_rankD_findAux h'
termination_by self.rankMax - self.rank x
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import data.set.intervals.pi from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e4bc74cbaf429d706cb9140902f7ca6c431e75a4"
/-!
# Intervals in `pi`-space
In this we prove various simple lemmas about intervals in `Π i, α i`. Closed intervals (`Ici x`,
`Iic x`, `Icc x y`) are equal to products of their projections to `α i`, while (semi-)open intervals
usually include the corresponding products as proper subsets.
-/
-- Porting note: Added, since dot notation no longer works on `Function.update`
open Function
variable {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
namespace Set
section PiPreorder
variable [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] (x y : ∀ i, α i)
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_Ici : (pi univ fun i ↦ Ici (x i)) = Ici x :=
ext fun y ↦ by simp [Pi.le_def]
#align set.pi_univ_Ici Set.pi_univ_Ici
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_Iic : (pi univ fun i ↦ Iic (x i)) = Iic x :=
ext fun y ↦ by simp [Pi.le_def]
#align set.pi_univ_Iic Set.pi_univ_Iic
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_Icc : (pi univ fun i ↦ Icc (x i) (y i)) = Icc x y :=
ext fun y ↦ by simp [Pi.le_def, forall_and]
#align set.pi_univ_Icc Set.pi_univ_Icc
theorem piecewise_mem_Icc {s : Set ι} [∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ s)] {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : ∀ i, α i}
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f₁ i ∈ Icc (g₁ i) (g₂ i)) (h₂ : ∀ i ∉ s, f₂ i ∈ Icc (g₁ i) (g₂ i)) :
s.piecewise f₁ f₂ ∈ Icc g₁ g₂ :=
⟨le_piecewise (fun i hi ↦ (h₁ i hi).1) fun i hi ↦ (h₂ i hi).1,
piecewise_le (fun i hi ↦ (h₁ i hi).2) fun i hi ↦ (h₂ i hi).2⟩
#align set.piecewise_mem_Icc Set.piecewise_mem_Icc
theorem piecewise_mem_Icc' {s : Set ι} [∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ s)] {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : ∀ i, α i}
(h₁ : f₁ ∈ Icc g₁ g₂) (h₂ : f₂ ∈ Icc g₁ g₂) : s.piecewise f₁ f₂ ∈ Icc g₁ g₂ :=
piecewise_mem_Icc (fun _ _ ↦ ⟨h₁.1 _, h₁.2 _⟩) fun _ _ ↦ ⟨h₂.1 _, h₂.2 _⟩
#align set.piecewise_mem_Icc' Set.piecewise_mem_Icc'
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem pi_univ_Ioi_subset : (pi univ fun i ↦ Ioi (x i)) ⊆ Ioi x := fun z hz ↦
⟨fun i ↦ le_of_lt <| hz i trivial, fun h ↦
(Nonempty.elim ‹Nonempty ι›) fun i ↦ not_lt_of_le (h i) (hz i trivial)⟩
#align set.pi_univ_Ioi_subset Set.pi_univ_Ioi_subset
theorem pi_univ_Iio_subset : (pi univ fun i ↦ Iio (x i)) ⊆ Iio x :=
@pi_univ_Ioi_subset ι (fun i ↦ (α i)ᵒᵈ) _ x _
#align set.pi_univ_Iio_subset Set.pi_univ_Iio_subset
theorem pi_univ_Ioo_subset : (pi univ fun i ↦ Ioo (x i) (y i)) ⊆ Ioo x y := fun _ hx ↦
⟨(pi_univ_Ioi_subset _) fun i hi ↦ (hx i hi).1, (pi_univ_Iio_subset _) fun i hi ↦ (hx i hi).2⟩
#align set.pi_univ_Ioo_subset Set.pi_univ_Ioo_subset
theorem pi_univ_Ioc_subset : (pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (y i)) ⊆ Ioc x y := fun _ hx ↦
⟨(pi_univ_Ioi_subset _) fun i hi ↦ (hx i hi).1, fun i ↦ (hx i trivial).2⟩
#align set.pi_univ_Ioc_subset Set.pi_univ_Ioc_subset
theorem pi_univ_Ico_subset : (pi univ fun i ↦ Ico (x i) (y i)) ⊆ Ico x y := fun _ hx ↦
⟨fun i ↦ (hx i trivial).1, (pi_univ_Iio_subset _) fun i hi ↦ (hx i hi).2⟩
#align set.pi_univ_Ico_subset Set.pi_univ_Ico_subset
end Nonempty
variable [DecidableEq ι]
open Function (update)
theorem pi_univ_Ioc_update_left {x y : ∀ i, α i} {i₀ : ι} {m : α i₀} (hm : x i₀ ≤ m) :
(pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (update x i₀ m i) (y i)) =
{ z | m < z i₀ } ∩ pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (y i) := by
have : Ioc m (y i₀) = Ioi m ∩ Ioc (x i₀) (y i₀) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← inter_assoc,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Ioi_subset_Ioi hm)]
simp_rw [univ_pi_update i₀ _ _ fun i z ↦ Ioc z (y i), ← pi_inter_compl ({i₀} : Set ι),
singleton_pi', ← inter_assoc, this]
rfl
#align set.pi_univ_Ioc_update_left Set.pi_univ_Ioc_update_left
theorem pi_univ_Ioc_update_right {x y : ∀ i, α i} {i₀ : ι} {m : α i₀} (hm : m ≤ y i₀) :
(pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (update y i₀ m i)) =
{ z | z i₀ ≤ m } ∩ pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (y i) := by
have : Ioc (x i₀) m = Iic m ∩ Ioc (x i₀) (y i₀) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_left_comm,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Iic_subset_Iic.2 hm)]
simp_rw [univ_pi_update i₀ y m fun i z ↦ Ioc (x i) z, ← pi_inter_compl ({i₀} : Set ι),
singleton_pi', ← inter_assoc, this]
rfl
#align set.pi_univ_Ioc_update_right Set.pi_univ_Ioc_update_right
theorem disjoint_pi_univ_Ioc_update_left_right {x y : ∀ i, α i} {i₀ : ι} {m : α i₀} :
Disjoint (pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (update y i₀ m i))
(pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (update x i₀ m i) (y i)) := by
rw [disjoint_left]
rintro z h₁ h₂
refine (h₁ i₀ (mem_univ _)).2.not_lt ?_
simpa only [Function.update_same] using (h₂ i₀ (mem_univ _)).1
#align set.disjoint_pi_univ_Ioc_update_left_right Set.disjoint_pi_univ_Ioc_update_left_right
end PiPreorder
section PiPartialOrder
variable [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, PartialOrder (α i)]
-- Porting note: Dot notation on `Function.update` broke
theorem image_update_Icc (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
update f i '' Icc a b = Icc (update f i a) (update f i b) := by
ext x
rw [← Set.pi_univ_Icc]
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨x i, ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
simpa [update_le_update_iff]
· simpa only [Function.update_same] using h i (mem_univ i)
· ext j
obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j
· exact Function.update_same _ _ _
· simpa only [Function.update_noteq hij.symm, le_antisymm_iff] using h j (mem_univ j)
#align set.image_update_Icc Set.image_update_Icc
theorem image_update_Ico (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
update f i '' Ico a b = Ico (update f i a) (update f i b) := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, ← Icc_diff_right, image_diff (update_injective _ _), image_singleton,
image_update_Icc]
#align set.image_update_Ico Set.image_update_Ico
theorem image_update_Ioc (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
update f i '' Ioc a b = Ioc (update f i a) (update f i b) := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, ← Icc_diff_left, image_diff (update_injective _ _), image_singleton,
image_update_Icc]
#align set.image_update_Ioc Set.image_update_Ioc
theorem image_update_Ioo (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
update f i '' Ioo a b = Ioo (update f i a) (update f i b) := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, ← Ico_diff_left, image_diff (update_injective _ _), image_singleton,
image_update_Ico]
#align set.image_update_Ioo Set.image_update_Ioo
theorem image_update_Icc_left (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a : α i) :
update f i '' Icc a (f i) = Icc (update f i a) f := by simpa using image_update_Icc f i a (f i)
#align set.image_update_Icc_left Set.image_update_Icc_left
theorem image_update_Ico_left (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a : α i) :
update f i '' Ico a (f i) = Ico (update f i a) f := by simpa using image_update_Ico f i a (f i)
#align set.image_update_Ico_left Set.image_update_Ico_left
theorem image_update_Ioc_left (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a : α i) :
update f i '' Ioc a (f i) = Ioc (update f i a) f := by simpa using image_update_Ioc f i a (f i)
#align set.image_update_Ioc_left Set.image_update_Ioc_left
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Pi.lean | 172 | 173 | theorem image_update_Ioo_left (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a : α i) :
update f i '' Ioo a (f i) = Ioo (update f i a) f := by | simpa using image_update_Ioo f i a (f i)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta
-/
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import order.upper_lower.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c0c52abb75074ed8b73a948341f50521fbf43b4c"
/-!
# Up-sets and down-sets
This file defines upper and lower sets in an order.
## Main declarations
* `IsUpperSet`: Predicate for a set to be an upper set. This means every element greater than a
member of the set is in the set itself.
* `IsLowerSet`: Predicate for a set to be a lower set. This means every element less than a member
of the set is in the set itself.
* `UpperSet`: The type of upper sets.
* `LowerSet`: The type of lower sets.
* `upperClosure`: The greatest upper set containing a set.
* `lowerClosure`: The least lower set containing a set.
* `UpperSet.Ici`: Principal upper set. `Set.Ici` as an upper set.
* `UpperSet.Ioi`: Strict principal upper set. `Set.Ioi` as an upper set.
* `LowerSet.Iic`: Principal lower set. `Set.Iic` as a lower set.
* `LowerSet.Iio`: Strict principal lower set. `Set.Iio` as a lower set.
## Notation
* `×ˢ` is notation for `UpperSet.prod` / `LowerSet.prod`.
## Notes
Upper sets are ordered by **reverse** inclusion. This convention is motivated by the fact that this
makes them order-isomorphic to lower sets and antichains, and matches the convention on `Filter`.
## TODO
Lattice structure on antichains. Order equivalence between upper/lower sets and antichains.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
/-! ### Unbundled upper/lower sets -/
section LE
variable [LE α] [LE β] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
/-- An upper set in an order `α` is a set such that any element greater than one of its members is
also a member. Also called up-set, upward-closed set. -/
@[aesop norm unfold]
def IsUpperSet (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a ≤ b → a ∈ s → b ∈ s
#align is_upper_set IsUpperSet
/-- A lower set in an order `α` is a set such that any element less than one of its members is also
a member. Also called down-set, downward-closed set. -/
@[aesop norm unfold]
def IsLowerSet (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, b ≤ a → a ∈ s → b ∈ s
#align is_lower_set IsLowerSet
theorem isUpperSet_empty : IsUpperSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_upper_set_empty isUpperSet_empty
theorem isLowerSet_empty : IsLowerSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_lower_set_empty isLowerSet_empty
theorem isUpperSet_univ : IsUpperSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_upper_set_univ isUpperSet_univ
theorem isLowerSet_univ : IsLowerSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_lower_set_univ isLowerSet_univ
theorem IsUpperSet.compl (hs : IsUpperSet s) : IsLowerSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
#align is_upper_set.compl IsUpperSet.compl
theorem IsLowerSet.compl (hs : IsLowerSet s) : IsUpperSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
#align is_lower_set.compl IsLowerSet.compl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_compl : IsUpperSet sᶜ ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsLowerSet.compl⟩
#align is_upper_set_compl isUpperSet_compl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_compl : IsLowerSet sᶜ ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsUpperSet.compl⟩
#align is_lower_set_compl isLowerSet_compl
theorem IsUpperSet.union (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_upper_set.union IsUpperSet.union
theorem IsLowerSet.union (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_lower_set.union IsLowerSet.union
theorem IsUpperSet.inter (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_upper_set.inter IsUpperSet.inter
theorem IsLowerSet.inter (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_lower_set.inter IsLowerSet.inter
theorem isUpperSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
#align is_upper_set_sUnion isUpperSet_sUnion
theorem isLowerSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
#align is_lower_set_sUnion isLowerSet_sUnion
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_upper_set_Union isUpperSet_iUnion
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_lower_set_Union isLowerSet_iUnion
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iUnion fun i => isUpperSet_iUnion <| hf i
#align is_upper_set_Union₂ isUpperSet_iUnion₂
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iUnion fun i => isLowerSet_iUnion <| hf i
#align is_lower_set_Union₂ isLowerSet_iUnion₂
theorem isUpperSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
#align is_upper_set_sInter isUpperSet_sInter
theorem isLowerSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
#align is_lower_set_sInter isLowerSet_sInter
theorem isUpperSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_upper_set_Inter isUpperSet_iInter
theorem isLowerSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_lower_set_Inter isLowerSet_iInter
theorem isUpperSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iInter fun i => isUpperSet_iInter <| hf i
#align is_upper_set_Inter₂ isUpperSet_iInter₂
theorem isLowerSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iInter fun i => isLowerSet_iInter <| hf i
#align is_lower_set_Inter₂ isLowerSet_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsLowerSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_lower_set_preimage_of_dual_iff isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsUpperSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_upper_set_preimage_of_dual_iff isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsLowerSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_lower_set_preimage_to_dual_iff isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsUpperSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_upper_set_preimage_to_dual_iff isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.toDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
#align is_upper_set.to_dual IsUpperSet.toDual
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.toDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
#align is_lower_set.to_dual IsLowerSet.toDual
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.ofDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
#align is_upper_set.of_dual IsUpperSet.ofDual
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.ofDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
#align is_lower_set.of_dual IsLowerSet.ofDual
lemma IsUpperSet.isLowerSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsUpperSet s) :
IsLowerSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.isUpperSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsLowerSet s) :
IsUpperSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t) :
IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hbc hb ↦ ⟨hs hbc hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hbc⟩
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t) :
IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hcb hb ↦ ⟨hs hcb hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hcb⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff_of_isLowerSet (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff_of_isUpperSet (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.erase (hs : IsUpperSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a → b = a) : IsUpperSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
lemma IsLowerSet.erase (hs : IsLowerSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b → b = a) : IsLowerSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (a : α)
theorem isUpperSet_Ici : IsUpperSet (Ici a) := fun _ _ => ge_trans
#align is_upper_set_Ici isUpperSet_Ici
theorem isLowerSet_Iic : IsLowerSet (Iic a) := fun _ _ => le_trans
#align is_lower_set_Iic isLowerSet_Iic
theorem isUpperSet_Ioi : IsUpperSet (Ioi a) := fun _ _ => flip lt_of_lt_of_le
#align is_upper_set_Ioi isUpperSet_Ioi
theorem isLowerSet_Iio : IsLowerSet (Iio a) := fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_lt
#align is_lower_set_Iio isLowerSet_Iio
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ici a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsUpperSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_upper_set_iff_Ici_subset isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iic a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsLowerSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_lower_set_iff_Iic_subset isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
alias ⟨IsUpperSet.Ici_subset, _⟩ := isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
#align is_upper_set.Ici_subset IsUpperSet.Ici_subset
alias ⟨IsLowerSet.Iic_subset, _⟩ := isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
#align is_lower_set.Iic_subset IsLowerSet.Iic_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset (h : IsUpperSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Ioi a ⊆ s :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha
#align is_upper_set.Ioi_subset IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset
theorem IsLowerSet.Iio_subset (h : IsLowerSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Iio a ⊆ s :=
h.toDual.Ioi_subset ha
#align is_lower_set.Iio_subset IsLowerSet.Iio_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.ordConnected (h : IsUpperSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ ha _ _ => Icc_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha⟩
#align is_upper_set.ord_connected IsUpperSet.ordConnected
theorem IsLowerSet.ordConnected (h : IsLowerSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hb => Icc_subset_Iic_self.trans <| h.Iic_subset hb⟩
#align is_lower_set.ord_connected IsLowerSet.ordConnected
theorem IsUpperSet.preimage (hs : IsUpperSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsUpperSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
#align is_upper_set.preimage IsUpperSet.preimage
theorem IsLowerSet.preimage (hs : IsLowerSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsLowerSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
#align is_lower_set.preimage IsLowerSet.preimage
theorem IsUpperSet.image (hs : IsUpperSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsUpperSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsUpperSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
#align is_upper_set.image IsUpperSet.image
theorem IsLowerSet.image (hs : IsLowerSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsLowerSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsLowerSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
#align is_lower_set.image IsLowerSet.image
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ici (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ici a = Ici (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ici_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iic (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iic a = Iic (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ici he a
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ioi (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ioi a = Ioi (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ioi_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iio (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iio a = Iio (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ioi he a
@[simp]
theorem Set.monotone_mem : Monotone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.monotone_mem Set.monotone_mem
@[simp]
theorem Set.antitone_mem : Antitone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
forall_swap
#align set.antitone_mem Set.antitone_mem
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_setOf : IsUpperSet { a | p a } ↔ Monotone p :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_upper_set_set_of isUpperSet_setOf
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_setOf : IsLowerSet { a | p a } ↔ Antitone p :=
forall_swap
#align is_lower_set_set_of isLowerSet_setOf
lemma IsUpperSet.upperBounds_subset (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → upperBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
lemma IsLowerSet.lowerBounds_subset (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → lowerBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α]
theorem IsLowerSet.top_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs le_top h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
#align is_lower_set.top_mem IsLowerSet.top_mem
theorem IsUpperSet.top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs le_top ha⟩
#align is_upper_set.top_mem IsUpperSet.top_mem
theorem IsUpperSet.not_top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.top_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
#align is_upper_set.not_top_mem IsUpperSet.not_top_mem
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α]
theorem IsUpperSet.bot_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs bot_le h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
#align is_upper_set.bot_mem IsUpperSet.bot_mem
theorem IsLowerSet.bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs bot_le ha⟩
#align is_lower_set.bot_mem IsLowerSet.bot_mem
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.bot_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
#align is_lower_set.not_bot_mem IsLowerSet.not_bot_mem
end OrderBot
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem IsUpperSet.not_bddAbove (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddAbove s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_gt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs ((hb ha).trans hc.le) ha)
#align is_upper_set.not_bdd_above IsUpperSet.not_bddAbove
theorem not_bddAbove_Ici : ¬BddAbove (Ici a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ici _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ici
#align not_bdd_above_Ici not_bddAbove_Ici
theorem not_bddAbove_Ioi : ¬BddAbove (Ioi a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ioi _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ioi
#align not_bdd_above_Ioi not_bddAbove_Ioi
end NoMaxOrder
section NoMinOrder
variable [NoMinOrder α]
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bddBelow (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddBelow s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_lt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs (hc.le.trans <| hb ha) ha)
#align is_lower_set.not_bdd_below IsLowerSet.not_bddBelow
theorem not_bddBelow_Iic : ¬BddBelow (Iic a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iic _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iic
#align not_bdd_below_Iic not_bddBelow_Iic
theorem not_bddBelow_Iio : ¬BddBelow (Iio a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iio _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iio
#align not_bdd_below_Iio not_bddBelow_Iio
end NoMinOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {s : Set α}
theorem isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a < b → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
#align is_upper_set_iff_forall_lt isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt
theorem isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, b < a → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
#align is_lower_set_iff_forall_lt isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ioi_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ioi a ⊆ s := by
simp [isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_upper_set_iff_Ioi_subset isUpperSet_iff_Ioi_subset
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iio_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iio a ⊆ s := by
simp [isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_lower_set_iff_Iio_subset isLowerSet_iff_Iio_subset
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s t : Set α}
theorem IsUpperSet.total (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s := by
by_contra! h
simp_rw [Set.not_subset] at h
obtain ⟨⟨a, has, hat⟩, b, hbt, hbs⟩ := h
obtain hab | hba := le_total a b
· exact hbs (hs hab has)
· exact hat (ht hba hbt)
#align is_upper_set.total IsUpperSet.total
theorem IsLowerSet.total (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s :=
hs.toDual.total ht.toDual
#align is_lower_set.total IsLowerSet.total
end LinearOrder
/-! ### Bundled upper/lower sets -/
section LE
variable [LE α]
/-- The type of upper sets of an order. -/
structure UpperSet (α : Type*) [LE α] where
/-- The carrier of an `UpperSet`. -/
carrier : Set α
/-- The carrier of an `UpperSet` is an upper set. -/
upper' : IsUpperSet carrier
#align upper_set UpperSet
/-- The type of lower sets of an order. -/
structure LowerSet (α : Type*) [LE α] where
/-- The carrier of a `LowerSet`. -/
carrier : Set α
/-- The carrier of a `LowerSet` is a lower set. -/
lower' : IsLowerSet carrier
#align lower_set LowerSet
namespace UpperSet
instance : SetLike (UpperSet α) α where
coe := UpperSet.carrier
coe_injective' s t h := by cases s; cases t; congr
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. -/
def Simps.coe (s : UpperSet α) : Set α := s
initialize_simps_projections UpperSet (carrier → coe)
@[ext]
theorem ext {s t : UpperSet α} : (s : Set α) = t → s = t :=
SetLike.ext'
#align upper_set.ext UpperSet.ext
@[simp]
theorem carrier_eq_coe (s : UpperSet α) : s.carrier = s :=
rfl
#align upper_set.carrier_eq_coe UpperSet.carrier_eq_coe
@[simp] protected lemma upper (s : UpperSet α) : IsUpperSet (s : Set α) := s.upper'
#align upper_set.upper UpperSet.upper
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (s : Set α) (hs) : mk s hs = s := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_mk {s : Set α} (hs) {a : α} : a ∈ mk s hs ↔ a ∈ s := Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.mem_mk UpperSet.mem_mk
end UpperSet
namespace LowerSet
instance : SetLike (LowerSet α) α where
coe := LowerSet.carrier
coe_injective' s t h := by cases s; cases t; congr
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. -/
def Simps.coe (s : LowerSet α) : Set α := s
initialize_simps_projections LowerSet (carrier → coe)
@[ext]
theorem ext {s t : LowerSet α} : (s : Set α) = t → s = t :=
SetLike.ext'
#align lower_set.ext LowerSet.ext
@[simp]
theorem carrier_eq_coe (s : LowerSet α) : s.carrier = s :=
rfl
#align lower_set.carrier_eq_coe LowerSet.carrier_eq_coe
@[simp] protected lemma lower (s : LowerSet α) : IsLowerSet (s : Set α) := s.lower'
#align lower_set.lower LowerSet.lower
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (s : Set α) (hs) : mk s hs = s := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_mk {s : Set α} (hs) {a : α} : a ∈ mk s hs ↔ a ∈ s := Iff.rfl
#align lower_set.mem_mk LowerSet.mem_mk
end LowerSet
/-! #### Order -/
namespace UpperSet
variable {S : Set (UpperSet α)} {s t : UpperSet α} {a : α}
instance : Sup (UpperSet α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨s ∩ t, s.upper.inter t.upper⟩⟩
instance : Inf (UpperSet α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨s ∪ t, s.upper.union t.upper⟩⟩
instance : Top (UpperSet α) :=
⟨⟨∅, isUpperSet_empty⟩⟩
instance : Bot (UpperSet α) :=
⟨⟨univ, isUpperSet_univ⟩⟩
instance : SupSet (UpperSet α) :=
⟨fun S => ⟨⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s, isUpperSet_iInter₂ fun s _ => s.upper⟩⟩
instance : InfSet (UpperSet α) :=
⟨fun S => ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s, isUpperSet_iUnion₂ fun s _ => s.upper⟩⟩
instance completelyDistribLattice : CompletelyDistribLattice (UpperSet α) :=
(toDual.injective.comp SetLike.coe_injective).completelyDistribLattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) rfl rfl
instance : Inhabited (UpperSet α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
@[simp 1100, norm_cast]
theorem coe_subset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊆ t ↔ t ≤ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.coe_subset_coe UpperSet.coe_subset_coe
@[simp 1100, norm_cast] lemma coe_ssubset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊂ t ↔ t < s := Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : UpperSet α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_top UpperSet.coe_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : UpperSet α) : Set α) = univ :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_bot UpperSet.coe_bot
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_univ : (s : Set α) = univ ↔ s = ⊥ := by simp [SetLike.ext'_iff]
#align upper_set.coe_eq_univ UpperSet.coe_eq_univ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty : (s : Set α) = ∅ ↔ s = ⊤ := by simp [SetLike.ext'_iff]
#align upper_set.coe_eq_empty UpperSet.coe_eq_empty
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nonempty : (s : Set α).Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ⊤ :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans coe_eq_empty.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup (s t : UpperSet α) : (↑(s ⊔ t) : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∩ t :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_sup UpperSet.coe_sup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (s t : UpperSet α) : (↑(s ⊓ t) : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∪ t :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_inf UpperSet.coe_inf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup (S : Set (UpperSet α)) : (↑(sSup S) : Set α) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_Sup UpperSet.coe_sSup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (UpperSet α)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set α) = ⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_Inf UpperSet.coe_sInf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iSup (f : ι → UpperSet α) : (↑(⨆ i, f i) : Set α) = ⋂ i, f i := by simp [iSup]
#align upper_set.coe_supr UpperSet.coe_iSup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf (f : ι → UpperSet α) : (↑(⨅ i, f i) : Set α) = ⋃ i, f i := by simp [iInf]
#align upper_set.coe_infi UpperSet.coe_iInf
@[norm_cast] -- Porting note: no longer a `simp`
theorem coe_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → UpperSet α) :
(↑(⨆ (i) (j), f i j) : Set α) = ⋂ (i) (j), f i j := by simp_rw [coe_iSup]
#align upper_set.coe_supr₂ UpperSet.coe_iSup₂
@[norm_cast] -- Porting note: no longer a `simp`
theorem coe_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → UpperSet α) :
(↑(⨅ (i) (j), f i j) : Set α) = ⋃ (i) (j), f i j := by simp_rw [coe_iInf]
#align upper_set.coe_infi₂ UpperSet.coe_iInf₂
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_top : a ∉ (⊤ : UpperSet α) :=
id
#align upper_set.not_mem_top UpperSet.not_mem_top
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot : a ∈ (⊥ : UpperSet α) :=
trivial
#align upper_set.mem_bot UpperSet.mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup_iff : a ∈ s ⊔ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.mem_sup_iff UpperSet.mem_sup_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf_iff : a ∈ s ⊓ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.mem_inf_iff UpperSet.mem_inf_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup_iff : a ∈ sSup S ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
mem_iInter₂
#align upper_set.mem_Sup_iff UpperSet.mem_sSup_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_sInf_iff : a ∈ sInf S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
mem_iUnion₂.trans <| by simp only [exists_prop, SetLike.mem_coe]
#align upper_set.mem_Inf_iff UpperSet.mem_sInf_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup_iff {f : ι → UpperSet α} : (a ∈ ⨆ i, f i) ↔ ∀ i, a ∈ f i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_iSup]
exact mem_iInter
#align upper_set.mem_supr_iff UpperSet.mem_iSup_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_iInf_iff {f : ι → UpperSet α} : (a ∈ ⨅ i, f i) ↔ ∃ i, a ∈ f i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_iInf]
exact mem_iUnion
#align upper_set.mem_infi_iff UpperSet.mem_iInf_iff
-- Porting note: no longer a @[simp]
theorem mem_iSup₂_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → UpperSet α} : (a ∈ ⨆ (i) (j), f i j) ↔ ∀ i j, a ∈ f i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iSup_iff]
#align upper_set.mem_supr₂_iff UpperSet.mem_iSup₂_iff
-- Porting note: no longer a @[simp]
theorem mem_iInf₂_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → UpperSet α} : (a ∈ ⨅ (i) (j), f i j) ↔ ∃ i j, a ∈ f i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInf_iff]
#align upper_set.mem_infi₂_iff UpperSet.mem_iInf₂_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem codisjoint_coe : Codisjoint (s : Set α) t ↔ Disjoint s t := by
simp [disjoint_iff, codisjoint_iff, SetLike.ext'_iff]
#align upper_set.codisjoint_coe UpperSet.codisjoint_coe
end UpperSet
namespace LowerSet
variable {S : Set (LowerSet α)} {s t : LowerSet α} {a : α}
instance : Sup (LowerSet α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨s ∪ t, fun _ _ h => Or.imp (s.lower h) (t.lower h)⟩⟩
instance : Inf (LowerSet α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨s ∩ t, fun _ _ h => And.imp (s.lower h) (t.lower h)⟩⟩
instance : Top (LowerSet α) :=
⟨⟨univ, fun _ _ _ => id⟩⟩
instance : Bot (LowerSet α) :=
⟨⟨∅, fun _ _ _ => id⟩⟩
instance : SupSet (LowerSet α) :=
⟨fun S => ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s, isLowerSet_iUnion₂ fun s _ => s.lower⟩⟩
instance : InfSet (LowerSet α) :=
⟨fun S => ⟨⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s, isLowerSet_iInter₂ fun s _ => s.lower⟩⟩
instance completelyDistribLattice : CompletelyDistribLattice (LowerSet α) :=
SetLike.coe_injective.completelyDistribLattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl)
(fun _ => rfl) rfl rfl
instance : Inhabited (LowerSet α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_subset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊆ t ↔ s ≤ t := Iff.rfl
#align lower_set.coe_subset_coe LowerSet.coe_subset_coe
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_ssubset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊂ t ↔ s < t := Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : LowerSet α) : Set α) = univ :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_top LowerSet.coe_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : LowerSet α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_bot LowerSet.coe_bot
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_univ : (s : Set α) = univ ↔ s = ⊤ := by simp [SetLike.ext'_iff]
#align lower_set.coe_eq_univ LowerSet.coe_eq_univ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty : (s : Set α) = ∅ ↔ s = ⊥ := by simp [SetLike.ext'_iff]
#align lower_set.coe_eq_empty LowerSet.coe_eq_empty
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nonempty : (s : Set α).Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ⊥ :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans coe_eq_empty.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup (s t : LowerSet α) : (↑(s ⊔ t) : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∪ t :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_sup LowerSet.coe_sup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (s t : LowerSet α) : (↑(s ⊓ t) : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∩ t :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_inf LowerSet.coe_inf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup (S : Set (LowerSet α)) : (↑(sSup S) : Set α) = ⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_Sup LowerSet.coe_sSup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (LowerSet α)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set α) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_Inf LowerSet.coe_sInf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iSup (f : ι → LowerSet α) : (↑(⨆ i, f i) : Set α) = ⋃ i, f i := by
simp_rw [iSup, coe_sSup, mem_range, iUnion_exists, iUnion_iUnion_eq']
#align lower_set.coe_supr LowerSet.coe_iSup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf (f : ι → LowerSet α) : (↑(⨅ i, f i) : Set α) = ⋂ i, f i := by
simp_rw [iInf, coe_sInf, mem_range, iInter_exists, iInter_iInter_eq']
#align lower_set.coe_infi LowerSet.coe_iInf
@[norm_cast] -- Porting note: no longer a `simp`
theorem coe_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → LowerSet α) :
(↑(⨆ (i) (j), f i j) : Set α) = ⋃ (i) (j), f i j := by simp_rw [coe_iSup]
#align lower_set.coe_supr₂ LowerSet.coe_iSup₂
@[norm_cast] -- Porting note: no longer a `simp`
theorem coe_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → LowerSet α) :
(↑(⨅ (i) (j), f i j) : Set α) = ⋂ (i) (j), f i j := by simp_rw [coe_iInf]
#align lower_set.coe_infi₂ LowerSet.coe_iInf₂
@[simp]
theorem mem_top : a ∈ (⊤ : LowerSet α) :=
trivial
#align lower_set.mem_top LowerSet.mem_top
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_bot : a ∉ (⊥ : LowerSet α) :=
id
#align lower_set.not_mem_bot LowerSet.not_mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup_iff : a ∈ s ⊔ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align lower_set.mem_sup_iff LowerSet.mem_sup_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf_iff : a ∈ s ⊓ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align lower_set.mem_inf_iff LowerSet.mem_inf_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup_iff : a ∈ sSup S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
mem_iUnion₂.trans <| by simp only [exists_prop, SetLike.mem_coe]
#align lower_set.mem_Sup_iff LowerSet.mem_sSup_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_sInf_iff : a ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
mem_iInter₂
#align lower_set.mem_Inf_iff LowerSet.mem_sInf_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup_iff {f : ι → LowerSet α} : (a ∈ ⨆ i, f i) ↔ ∃ i, a ∈ f i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_iSup]
exact mem_iUnion
#align lower_set.mem_supr_iff LowerSet.mem_iSup_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_iInf_iff {f : ι → LowerSet α} : (a ∈ ⨅ i, f i) ↔ ∀ i, a ∈ f i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_iInf]
exact mem_iInter
#align lower_set.mem_infi_iff LowerSet.mem_iInf_iff
-- Porting note: no longer a @[simp]
theorem mem_iSup₂_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → LowerSet α} : (a ∈ ⨆ (i) (j), f i j) ↔ ∃ i j, a ∈ f i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iSup_iff]
#align lower_set.mem_supr₂_iff LowerSet.mem_iSup₂_iff
-- Porting note: no longer a @[simp]
theorem mem_iInf₂_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → LowerSet α} : (a ∈ ⨅ (i) (j), f i j) ↔ ∀ i j, a ∈ f i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInf_iff]
#align lower_set.mem_infi₂_iff LowerSet.mem_iInf₂_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem disjoint_coe : Disjoint (s : Set α) t ↔ Disjoint s t := by
simp [disjoint_iff, SetLike.ext'_iff]
#align lower_set.disjoint_coe LowerSet.disjoint_coe
end LowerSet
/-! #### Complement -/
/-- The complement of a lower set as an upper set. -/
def UpperSet.compl (s : UpperSet α) : LowerSet α :=
⟨sᶜ, s.upper.compl⟩
#align upper_set.compl UpperSet.compl
/-- The complement of a lower set as an upper set. -/
def LowerSet.compl (s : LowerSet α) : UpperSet α :=
⟨sᶜ, s.lower.compl⟩
#align lower_set.compl LowerSet.compl
namespace UpperSet
variable {s t : UpperSet α} {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem coe_compl (s : UpperSet α) : (s.compl : Set α) = (↑s)ᶜ :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_compl UpperSet.coe_compl
@[simp]
theorem mem_compl_iff : a ∈ s.compl ↔ a ∉ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.mem_compl_iff UpperSet.mem_compl_iff
@[simp]
nonrec theorem compl_compl (s : UpperSet α) : s.compl.compl = s :=
UpperSet.ext <| compl_compl _
#align upper_set.compl_compl UpperSet.compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem compl_le_compl : s.compl ≤ t.compl ↔ s ≤ t :=
compl_subset_compl
#align upper_set.compl_le_compl UpperSet.compl_le_compl
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_sup (s t : UpperSet α) : (s ⊔ t).compl = s.compl ⊔ t.compl :=
LowerSet.ext compl_inf
#align upper_set.compl_sup UpperSet.compl_sup
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_inf (s t : UpperSet α) : (s ⊓ t).compl = s.compl ⊓ t.compl :=
LowerSet.ext compl_sup
#align upper_set.compl_inf UpperSet.compl_inf
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_top : (⊤ : UpperSet α).compl = ⊤ :=
LowerSet.ext compl_empty
#align upper_set.compl_top UpperSet.compl_top
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_bot : (⊥ : UpperSet α).compl = ⊥ :=
LowerSet.ext compl_univ
#align upper_set.compl_bot UpperSet.compl_bot
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_sSup (S : Set (UpperSet α)) : (sSup S).compl = ⨆ s ∈ S, UpperSet.compl s :=
LowerSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_sSup, compl_iInter₂, LowerSet.coe_iSup₂]
#align upper_set.compl_Sup UpperSet.compl_sSup
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_sInf (S : Set (UpperSet α)) : (sInf S).compl = ⨅ s ∈ S, UpperSet.compl s :=
LowerSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_sInf, compl_iUnion₂, LowerSet.coe_iInf₂]
#align upper_set.compl_Inf UpperSet.compl_sInf
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_iSup (f : ι → UpperSet α) : (⨆ i, f i).compl = ⨆ i, (f i).compl :=
LowerSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_iSup, compl_iInter, LowerSet.coe_iSup]
#align upper_set.compl_supr UpperSet.compl_iSup
@[simp]
protected theorem compl_iInf (f : ι → UpperSet α) : (⨅ i, f i).compl = ⨅ i, (f i).compl :=
LowerSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_iInf, compl_iUnion, LowerSet.coe_iInf]
#align upper_set.compl_infi UpperSet.compl_iInf
-- Porting note: no longer a @[simp]
theorem compl_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → UpperSet α) :
(⨆ (i) (j), f i j).compl = ⨆ (i) (j), (f i j).compl := by simp_rw [UpperSet.compl_iSup]
#align upper_set.compl_supr₂ UpperSet.compl_iSup₂
-- Porting note: no longer a @[simp]
theorem compl_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → UpperSet α) :
(⨅ (i) (j), f i j).compl = ⨅ (i) (j), (f i j).compl := by simp_rw [UpperSet.compl_iInf]
#align upper_set.compl_infi₂ UpperSet.compl_iInf₂
end UpperSet
namespace LowerSet
variable {s t : LowerSet α} {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem coe_compl (s : LowerSet α) : (s.compl : Set α) = (↑s)ᶜ :=
rfl
#align lower_set.coe_compl LowerSet.coe_compl
@[simp]
theorem mem_compl_iff : a ∈ s.compl ↔ a ∉ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align lower_set.mem_compl_iff LowerSet.mem_compl_iff
@[simp]
nonrec theorem compl_compl (s : LowerSet α) : s.compl.compl = s :=
LowerSet.ext <| compl_compl _
#align lower_set.compl_compl LowerSet.compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem compl_le_compl : s.compl ≤ t.compl ↔ s ≤ t :=
compl_subset_compl
#align lower_set.compl_le_compl LowerSet.compl_le_compl
protected theorem compl_sup (s t : LowerSet α) : (s ⊔ t).compl = s.compl ⊔ t.compl :=
UpperSet.ext compl_sup
#align lower_set.compl_sup LowerSet.compl_sup
protected theorem compl_inf (s t : LowerSet α) : (s ⊓ t).compl = s.compl ⊓ t.compl :=
UpperSet.ext compl_inf
#align lower_set.compl_inf LowerSet.compl_inf
protected theorem compl_top : (⊤ : LowerSet α).compl = ⊤ :=
UpperSet.ext compl_univ
#align lower_set.compl_top LowerSet.compl_top
protected theorem compl_bot : (⊥ : LowerSet α).compl = ⊥ :=
UpperSet.ext compl_empty
#align lower_set.compl_bot LowerSet.compl_bot
protected theorem compl_sSup (S : Set (LowerSet α)) : (sSup S).compl = ⨆ s ∈ S, LowerSet.compl s :=
UpperSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_sSup, compl_iUnion₂, UpperSet.coe_iSup₂]
#align lower_set.compl_Sup LowerSet.compl_sSup
protected theorem compl_sInf (S : Set (LowerSet α)) : (sInf S).compl = ⨅ s ∈ S, LowerSet.compl s :=
UpperSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_sInf, compl_iInter₂, UpperSet.coe_iInf₂]
#align lower_set.compl_Inf LowerSet.compl_sInf
protected theorem compl_iSup (f : ι → LowerSet α) : (⨆ i, f i).compl = ⨆ i, (f i).compl :=
UpperSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_iSup, compl_iUnion, UpperSet.coe_iSup]
#align lower_set.compl_supr LowerSet.compl_iSup
protected theorem compl_iInf (f : ι → LowerSet α) : (⨅ i, f i).compl = ⨅ i, (f i).compl :=
UpperSet.ext <| by simp only [coe_compl, coe_iInf, compl_iInter, UpperSet.coe_iInf]
#align lower_set.compl_infi LowerSet.compl_iInf
@[simp]
theorem compl_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → LowerSet α) :
(⨆ (i) (j), f i j).compl = ⨆ (i) (j), (f i j).compl := by simp_rw [LowerSet.compl_iSup]
#align lower_set.compl_supr₂ LowerSet.compl_iSup₂
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → LowerSet α) :
(⨅ (i) (j), f i j).compl = ⨅ (i) (j), (f i j).compl := by simp_rw [LowerSet.compl_iInf]
#align lower_set.compl_infi₂ LowerSet.compl_iInf₂
end LowerSet
/-- Upper sets are order-isomorphic to lower sets under complementation. -/
@[simps]
def upperSetIsoLowerSet : UpperSet α ≃o LowerSet α where
toFun := UpperSet.compl
invFun := LowerSet.compl
left_inv := UpperSet.compl_compl
right_inv := LowerSet.compl_compl
map_rel_iff' := UpperSet.compl_le_compl
#align upper_set_iso_lower_set upperSetIsoLowerSet
end LE
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
instance UpperSet.isTotal_le : IsTotal (UpperSet α) (· ≤ ·) := ⟨fun s t => t.upper.total s.upper⟩
#align upper_set.is_total_le UpperSet.isTotal_le
instance LowerSet.isTotal_le : IsTotal (LowerSet α) (· ≤ ·) := ⟨fun s t => s.lower.total t.lower⟩
#align lower_set.is_total_le LowerSet.isTotal_le
noncomputable instance : CompleteLinearOrder (UpperSet α) :=
{ UpperSet.completelyDistribLattice with
le_total := IsTotal.total
decidableLE := Classical.decRel _
decidableEq := Classical.decRel _
decidableLT := Classical.decRel _ }
noncomputable instance : CompleteLinearOrder (LowerSet α) :=
{ LowerSet.completelyDistribLattice with
le_total := IsTotal.total
decidableLE := Classical.decRel _
decidableEq := Classical.decRel _
decidableLT := Classical.decRel _ }
end LinearOrder
/-! #### Map -/
section
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ]
namespace UpperSet
variable {f : α ≃o β} {s t : UpperSet α} {a : α} {b : β}
/-- An order isomorphism of preorders induces an order isomorphism of their upper sets. -/
def map (f : α ≃o β) : UpperSet α ≃o UpperSet β where
toFun s := ⟨f '' s, s.upper.image f⟩
invFun t := ⟨f ⁻¹' t, t.upper.preimage f.monotone⟩
left_inv _ := ext <| f.preimage_image _
right_inv _ := ext <| f.image_preimage _
map_rel_iff' := image_subset_image_iff f.injective
#align upper_set.map UpperSet.map
@[simp]
theorem symm_map (f : α ≃o β) : (map f).symm = map f.symm :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ fun s => ext <| by convert Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
#align upper_set.symm_map UpperSet.symm_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map : b ∈ map f s ↔ f.symm b ∈ s := by
rw [← f.symm_symm, ← symm_map, f.symm_symm]
rfl
#align upper_set.mem_map UpperSet.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem map_refl : map (OrderIso.refl α) = OrderIso.refl _ := by
ext
simp
#align upper_set.map_refl UpperSet.map_refl
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β ≃o γ) (f : α ≃o β) : map g (map f s) = map (f.trans g) s := by
ext
simp
#align upper_set.map_map UpperSet.map_map
variable (f s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map : (map f s : Set β) = f '' s :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_map UpperSet.coe_map
end UpperSet
namespace LowerSet
variable {f : α ≃o β} {s t : LowerSet α} {a : α} {b : β}
/-- An order isomorphism of preorders induces an order isomorphism of their lower sets. -/
def map (f : α ≃o β) : LowerSet α ≃o LowerSet β where
toFun s := ⟨f '' s, s.lower.image f⟩
invFun t := ⟨f ⁻¹' t, t.lower.preimage f.monotone⟩
left_inv _ := SetLike.coe_injective <| f.preimage_image _
right_inv _ := SetLike.coe_injective <| f.image_preimage _
map_rel_iff' := image_subset_image_iff f.injective
#align lower_set.map LowerSet.map
@[simp]
theorem symm_map (f : α ≃o β) : (map f).symm = map f.symm :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ fun s => ext <| by convert Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
#align lower_set.symm_map LowerSet.symm_map
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/UpperLower/Basic.lean | 1,117 | 1,119 | theorem mem_map {f : α ≃o β} {b : β} : b ∈ map f s ↔ f.symm b ∈ s := by |
rw [← f.symm_symm, ← symm_map, f.symm_symm]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Wrenna Robson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
#align_import topology.metric_space.infsep from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5316314b553dcf8c6716541851517c1a9715e22b"
/-!
# Infimum separation
This file defines the extended infimum separation of a set. This is approximately dual to the
diameter of a set, but where the extended diameter of a set is the supremum of the extended distance
between elements of the set, the extended infimum separation is the infimum of the (extended)
distance between *distinct* elements in the set.
We also define the infimum separation as the cast of the extended infimum separation to the reals.
This is the infimum of the distance between distinct elements of the set when in a pseudometric
space.
All lemmas and definitions are in the `Set` namespace to give access to dot notation.
## Main definitions
* `Set.einfsep`: Extended infimum separation of a set.
* `Set.infsep`: Infimum separation of a set (when in a pseudometric space).
!-/
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Einfsep
open ENNReal
open Function
/-- The "extended infimum separation" of a set with an edist function. -/
noncomputable def einfsep [EDist α] (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s) (_ : x ≠ y), edist x y
#align set.einfsep Set.einfsep
section EDist
variable [EDist α] {x y : α} {s t : Set α}
theorem le_einfsep_iff {d} :
d ≤ s.einfsep ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → d ≤ edist x y := by
simp_rw [einfsep, le_iInf_iff]
#align set.le_einfsep_iff Set.le_einfsep_iff
theorem einfsep_zero : s.einfsep = 0 ↔ ∀ C > 0, ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < C := by
simp_rw [einfsep, ← _root_.bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
#align set.einfsep_zero Set.einfsep_zero
theorem einfsep_pos : 0 < s.einfsep ↔ ∃ C > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → C ≤ edist x y := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, einfsep_zero]
simp only [not_forall, not_exists, not_lt, exists_prop, not_and]
#align set.einfsep_pos Set.einfsep_pos
theorem einfsep_top :
s.einfsep = ∞ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → edist x y = ∞ := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_eq_top]
#align set.einfsep_top Set.einfsep_top
theorem einfsep_lt_top :
s.einfsep < ∞ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < ∞ := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
#align set.einfsep_lt_top Set.einfsep_lt_top
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Infsep.lean | 74 | 76 | theorem einfsep_ne_top :
s.einfsep ≠ ∞ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y ≠ ∞ := by |
simp_rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top, einfsep_lt_top]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Coeff
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.power_series.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2d5739b61641ee4e7e53eca5688a08f66f2e6a60"
/-!
# Formal power series in one variable - Truncation
`PowerSeries.trunc n φ` truncates a (univariate) formal power series
to the polynomial that has the same coefficients as `φ`, for all `m < n`,
and `0` otherwise.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section Trunc
variable [Semiring R]
open Finset Nat
/-- The `n`th truncation of a formal power series to a polynomial -/
def trunc (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) : R[X] :=
∑ m ∈ Ico 0 n, Polynomial.monomial m (coeff R m φ)
#align power_series.trunc PowerSeries.trunc
theorem coeff_trunc (m) (n) (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
(trunc n φ).coeff m = if m < n then coeff R m φ else 0 := by
simp [trunc, Polynomial.coeff_sum, Polynomial.coeff_monomial, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
#align power_series.coeff_trunc PowerSeries.coeff_trunc
@[simp]
theorem trunc_zero (n) : trunc n (0 : R⟦X⟧) = 0 :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, LinearMap.map_zero, Polynomial.coeff_zero]
split_ifs <;> rfl
#align power_series.trunc_zero PowerSeries.trunc_zero
@[simp]
theorem trunc_one (n) : trunc (n + 1) (1 : R⟦X⟧) = 1 :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_one, Polynomial.coeff_one]
split_ifs with h _ h'
· rfl
· rfl
· subst h'; simp at h
· rfl
#align power_series.trunc_one PowerSeries.trunc_one
@[simp]
theorem trunc_C (n) (a : R) : trunc (n + 1) (C R a) = Polynomial.C a :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_C, Polynomial.coeff_C]
split_ifs with H <;> first |rfl|try simp_all
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align power_series.trunc_C PowerSeries.trunc_C
@[simp]
theorem trunc_add (n) (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) : trunc n (φ + ψ) = trunc n φ + trunc n ψ :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
simp only [coeff_trunc, AddMonoidHom.map_add, Polynomial.coeff_add]
split_ifs with H
· rfl
· rw [zero_add]
#align power_series.trunc_add PowerSeries.trunc_add
theorem trunc_succ (f : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) :
trunc n.succ f = trunc n f + Polynomial.monomial n (coeff R n f) := by
rw [trunc, Ico_zero_eq_range, sum_range_succ, trunc, Ico_zero_eq_range]
theorem natDegree_trunc_lt (f : R⟦X⟧) (n) : (trunc (n + 1) f).natDegree < n + 1 := by
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff, natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero]
intros
rw [coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· rw [lt_succ, ← not_lt] at h
contradiction
· rfl
@[simp] lemma trunc_zero' {f : R⟦X⟧} : trunc 0 f = 0 := rfl
theorem degree_trunc_lt (f : R⟦X⟧) (n) : (trunc n f).degree < n := by
rw [degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero]
intros
rw [coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· rw [← not_le] at h
contradiction
· rfl
theorem eval₂_trunc_eq_sum_range {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (s : S) (G : R →+* S) (n) (f : R⟦X⟧) :
(trunc n f).eval₂ G s = ∑ i ∈ range n, G (coeff R i f) * s ^ i := by
cases n with
| zero =>
rw [trunc_zero', range_zero, sum_empty, eval₂_zero]
| succ n =>
have := natDegree_trunc_lt f n
rw [eval₂_eq_sum_range' (hn := this)]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro _ h
rw [mem_range] at h
congr
rw [coeff_trunc, if_pos h]
@[simp] theorem trunc_X (n) : trunc (n + 2) X = (Polynomial.X : R[X]) := by
ext d
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_X]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [h₂, coeff_X_one]
· rw [coeff_X_of_ne_one h₂]
· rw [coeff_X_of_ne_one]
intro hd
apply h₁
rw [hd]
exact n.one_lt_succ_succ
lemma trunc_X_of {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) : trunc n X = (Polynomial.X : R[X]) := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n =>
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n => exact trunc_X n
end Trunc
section Trunc
/-
Lemmas in this section involve the coercion `R[X] → R⟦X⟧`, so they may only be stated in the case
`R` is commutative. This is because the coercion is an `R`-algebra map.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
open Nat hiding pow_succ pow_zero
open Polynomial Finset Finset.Nat
theorem trunc_trunc_of_le {n m} (f : R⟦X⟧) (hnm : n ≤ m := by rfl) :
trunc n ↑(trunc m f) = trunc n f := by
ext d
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_trunc, coeff_coe]
split_ifs with h
· rw [coeff_trunc, if_pos <| lt_of_lt_of_le h hnm]
· rfl
@[simp] theorem trunc_trunc {n} (f : R⟦X⟧) : trunc n ↑(trunc n f) = trunc n f :=
trunc_trunc_of_le f
@[simp] theorem trunc_trunc_mul {n} (f g : R ⟦X⟧) :
trunc n ((trunc n f) * g : R⟦X⟧) = trunc n (f * g) := by
ext m
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· rw [coeff_mul, coeff_mul, sum_congr rfl]
intro _ hab
have ha := lt_of_le_of_lt (antidiagonal.fst_le hab) h
rw [coeff_coe, coeff_trunc, if_pos ha]
· rfl
@[simp] theorem trunc_mul_trunc {n} (f g : R ⟦X⟧) :
trunc n (f * (trunc n g) : R⟦X⟧) = trunc n (f * g) := by
rw [mul_comm, trunc_trunc_mul, mul_comm]
theorem trunc_trunc_mul_trunc {n} (f g : R⟦X⟧) :
trunc n (trunc n f * trunc n g : R⟦X⟧) = trunc n (f * g) := by
rw [trunc_trunc_mul, trunc_mul_trunc]
@[simp] theorem trunc_trunc_pow (f : R⟦X⟧) (n a : ℕ) :
trunc n ((trunc n f : R⟦X⟧) ^ a) = trunc n (f ^ a) := by
induction a with
| zero =>
rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ a ih =>
rw [_root_.pow_succ', _root_.pow_succ', trunc_trunc_mul,
← trunc_trunc_mul_trunc, ih, trunc_trunc_mul_trunc]
theorem trunc_coe_eq_self {n} {f : R[X]} (hn : natDegree f < n) : trunc n (f : R⟦X⟧) = f := by
rw [← Polynomial.coe_inj]
ext m
rw [coeff_coe, coeff_trunc]
split
case isTrue h => rfl
case isFalse h =>
rw [not_lt] at h
rw [coeff_coe]; symm
exact coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le hn h
/-- The function `coeff n : R⟦X⟧ → R` is continuous. I.e. `coeff n f` depends only on a sufficiently
long truncation of the power series `f`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Trunc.lean | 206 | 208 | theorem coeff_coe_trunc_of_lt {n m} {f : R⟦X⟧} (h : n < m) :
coeff R n (trunc m f) = coeff R n f := by |
rwa [coeff_coe, coeff_trunc, if_pos]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Instances
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pi
/-!
# Maps (semi)conjugating a shift to a shift
Denote by $S^1$ the unit circle `UnitAddCircle`.
A common way to study a self-map $f\colon S^1\to S^1$ of degree `1`
is to lift it to a map $\tilde f\colon \mathbb R\to \mathbb R$
such that $\tilde f(x + 1) = \tilde f(x)+1$ for all `x`.
In this file we define a structure and a typeclass
for bundled maps satisfying `f (x + a) = f x + b`.
We use parameters `a` and `b` instead of `1` to accomodate for two use cases:
- maps between circles of different lengths;
- self-maps $f\colon S^1\to S^1$ of degree other than one,
including orientation-reversing maps.
-/
open Function Set
/-- A bundled map `f : G → H` such that `f (x + a) = f x + b` for all `x`.
One can think about `f` as a lift to `G` of a map between two `AddCircle`s. -/
structure AddConstMap (G H : Type*) [Add G] [Add H] (a : G) (b : H) where
/-- The underlying function of an `AddConstMap`.
Use automatic coercion to function instead. -/
protected toFun : G → H
/-- An `AddConstMap` satisfies `f (x + a) = f x + b`. Use `map_add_const` instead. -/
map_add_const' (x : G) : toFun (x + a) = toFun x + b
@[inherit_doc]
scoped [AddConstMap] notation:25 G " →+c[" a ", " b "] " H => AddConstMap G H a b
/-- Typeclass for maps satisfying `f (x + a) = f x + b`.
Note that `a` and `b` are `outParam`s,
so one should not add instances like
`[AddConstMapClass F G H a b] : AddConstMapClass F G H (-a) (-b)`. -/
class AddConstMapClass (F : Type*) (G H : outParam Type*) [Add G] [Add H]
(a : outParam G) (b : outParam H) extends DFunLike F G fun _ ↦ H where
/-- A map of `AddConstMapClass` class semiconjugates shift by `a` to the shift by `b`:
`∀ x, f (x + a) = f x + b`. -/
map_add_const (f : F) (x : G) : f (x + a) = f x + b
namespace AddConstMapClass
/-!
### Properties of `AddConstMapClass` maps
In this section we prove properties like `f (x + n • a) = f x + n • b`.
-/
attribute [simp] map_add_const
variable {F G H : Type*} {a : G} {b : H}
protected theorem semiconj [Add G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b] (f : F) :
Semiconj f (· + a) (· + b) :=
map_add_const f
@[simp]
theorem map_add_nsmul [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n • a) = f x + n • b := by
simpa using (AddConstMapClass.semiconj f).iterate_right n x
@[simp]
theorem map_add_nat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n • b := by simp [← map_add_nsmul]
theorem map_add_one [AddMonoidWithOne G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (x + 1) = f x + b := map_add_const f x
@[simp]
theorem map_add_ofNat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (x + no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = f x + (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) • b :=
map_add_nat' f x n
theorem map_add_nat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n := by simp
theorem map_add_ofNat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (x + OfNat.ofNat n) = f x + OfNat.ofNat n := map_add_nat f x n
@[simp]
theorem map_const [AddZeroClass G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b] (f : F) :
f a = f 0 + b := by
simpa using map_add_const f 0
theorem map_one [AddZeroClass G] [One G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b] (f : F) :
f 1 = f 0 + b :=
map_const f
@[simp]
theorem map_nsmul_const [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) : f (n • a) = f 0 + n • b := by
simpa using map_add_nsmul f 0 n
@[simp]
theorem map_nat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) : f n = f 0 + n • b := by
simpa using map_add_nat' f 0 n
theorem map_ofNat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (OfNat.ofNat n) = f 0 + (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) • b :=
map_nat' f n
theorem map_nat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) : f n = f 0 + n := by simp
theorem map_ofNat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (OfNat.ofNat n) = f 0 + OfNat.ofNat n := map_nat f n
@[simp]
theorem map_const_add [AddCommSemigroup G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (a + x) = f x + b := by
rw [add_comm, map_add_const]
theorem map_one_add [AddCommMonoidWithOne G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (1 + x) = f x + b := map_const_add f x
@[simp]
theorem map_nsmul_add [AddCommMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) (x : G) : f (n • a + x) = f x + n • b := by
rw [add_comm, map_add_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem map_nat_add' [AddCommMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) (x : G) : f (↑n + x) = f x + n • b := by
simpa using map_nsmul_add f n x
theorem map_ofNat_add' [AddCommMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (x : G) :
f (OfNat.ofNat n + x) = f x + OfNat.ofNat n • b :=
map_nat_add' f n x
theorem map_nat_add [AddCommMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) (x : G) : f (↑n + x) = f x + n := by simp
theorem map_ofNat_add [AddCommMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (x : G) :
f (OfNat.ofNat n + x) = f x + OfNat.ofNat n :=
map_nat_add f n x
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_nsmul [AddGroup G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n • a) = f x - n • b := by
conv_rhs => rw [← sub_add_cancel x (n • a), map_add_nsmul, add_sub_cancel_right]
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_const [AddGroup G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (x - a) = f x - b := by
simpa using map_sub_nsmul f x 1
theorem map_sub_one [AddGroup G] [One G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (x - 1) = f x - b :=
map_sub_const f x
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_nat' [AddGroupWithOne G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n) = f x - n • b := by
simpa using map_sub_nsmul f x n
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_ofNat' [AddGroupWithOne G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (x - no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = f x - OfNat.ofNat n • b :=
map_sub_nat' f x n
@[simp]
theorem map_add_zsmul [AddGroup G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) : ∀ n : ℤ, f (x + n • a) = f x + n • b
| (n : ℕ) => by simp
| .negSucc n => by simp [← sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem map_zsmul_const [AddGroup G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (n : ℤ) : f (n • a) = f 0 + n • b := by
simpa using map_add_zsmul f 0 n
@[simp]
theorem map_add_int' [AddGroupWithOne G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℤ) : f (x + n) = f x + n • b := by
rw [← map_add_zsmul f x n, zsmul_one]
theorem map_add_int [AddGroupWithOne G] [AddGroupWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℤ) : f (x + n) = f x + n := by simp
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_zsmul [AddGroup G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n • a) = f x - n • b := by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using map_add_zsmul f x (-n)
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_int' [AddGroupWithOne G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n) = f x - n • b := by
rw [← map_sub_zsmul, zsmul_one]
theorem map_sub_int [AddGroupWithOne G] [AddGroupWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n) = f x - n := by simp
@[simp]
theorem map_zsmul_add [AddCommGroup G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (n : ℤ) (x : G) : f (n • a + x) = f x + n • b := by
rw [add_comm, map_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem map_int_add' [AddCommGroupWithOne G] [AddGroup H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (n : ℤ) (x : G) : f (↑n + x) = f x + n • b := by
rw [← map_zsmul_add, zsmul_one]
| Mathlib/Algebra/AddConstMap/Basic.lean | 226 | 227 | theorem map_int_add [AddCommGroupWithOne G] [AddGroupWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (n : ℤ) (x : G) : f (↑n + x) = f x + n := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Floris van Doorn, Sébastien Gouëzel, Alex J. Best
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.ProdSigma
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
#align_import data.list.big_operators.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6c5f73fd6f6cc83122788a80a27cdd54663609f4"
/-!
# Sums and products from lists
This file provides basic results about `List.prod`, `List.sum`, which calculate the product and sum
of elements of a list and `List.alternatingProd`, `List.alternatingSum`, their alternating
counterparts.
-/
-- Make sure we haven't imported `Data.Nat.Order.Basic`
assert_not_exists OrderedSub
assert_not_exists Ring
variable {ι α β M N P G : Type*}
namespace List
section Defs
/-- Product of a list.
`List.prod [a, b, c] = ((1 * a) * b) * c` -/
@[to_additive "Sum of a list.\n\n`List.sum [a, b, c] = ((0 + a) + b) + c`"]
def prod {α} [Mul α] [One α] : List α → α :=
foldl (· * ·) 1
#align list.prod List.prod
#align list.sum List.sum
/-- The alternating sum of a list. -/
def alternatingSum {G : Type*} [Zero G] [Add G] [Neg G] : List G → G
| [] => 0
| g :: [] => g
| g :: h :: t => g + -h + alternatingSum t
#align list.alternating_sum List.alternatingSum
/-- The alternating product of a list. -/
@[to_additive existing]
def alternatingProd {G : Type*} [One G] [Mul G] [Inv G] : List G → G
| [] => 1
| g :: [] => g
| g :: h :: t => g * h⁻¹ * alternatingProd t
#align list.alternating_prod List.alternatingProd
end Defs
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M] {l : List M} {a : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_nil : ([] : List M).prod = 1 :=
rfl
#align list.prod_nil List.prod_nil
#align list.sum_nil List.sum_nil
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_singleton : [a].prod = a :=
one_mul a
#align list.prod_singleton List.prod_singleton
#align list.sum_singleton List.sum_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_one_cons : (1 :: l).prod = l.prod := by
rw [prod, foldl, mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_map_one {l : List ι} :
(l.map fun _ => (1 : M)).prod = 1 := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih => rw [map_cons, prod_one_cons, ih]
end MulOneClass
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] [Monoid N] [Monoid P] {l l₁ l₂ : List M} {a : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_cons : (a :: l).prod = a * l.prod :=
calc
(a :: l).prod = foldl (· * ·) (a * 1) l := by
simp only [List.prod, foldl_cons, one_mul, mul_one]
_ = _ := foldl_assoc
#align list.prod_cons List.prod_cons
#align list.sum_cons List.sum_cons
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_induction
(p : M → Prop) (hom : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (a * b)) (unit : p 1) (base : ∀ x ∈ l, p x) :
p l.prod := by
induction' l with a l ih
· simpa
rw [List.prod_cons]
simp only [Bool.not_eq_true, List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp] at base
exact hom _ _ (base.1) (ih base.2)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_append : (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = l₁.prod * l₂.prod :=
calc
(l₁ ++ l₂).prod = foldl (· * ·) (foldl (· * ·) 1 l₁ * 1) l₂ := by simp [List.prod]
_ = l₁.prod * l₂.prod := foldl_assoc
#align list.prod_append List.prod_append
#align list.sum_append List.sum_append
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_concat : (l.concat a).prod = l.prod * a := by
rw [concat_eq_append, prod_append, prod_singleton]
#align list.prod_concat List.prod_concat
#align list.sum_concat List.sum_concat
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_join {l : List (List M)} : l.join.prod = (l.map List.prod).prod := by
induction l <;> [rfl; simp only [*, List.join, map, prod_append, prod_cons]]
#align list.prod_join List.prod_join
#align list.sum_join List.sum_join
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_foldr : ∀ {l : List M}, l.prod = foldr (· * ·) 1 l
| [] => rfl
| cons a l => by rw [prod_cons, foldr_cons, prod_eq_foldr]
#align list.prod_eq_foldr List.prod_eq_foldr
#align list.sum_eq_foldr List.sum_eq_foldr
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : M) : (replicate n a).prod = a ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [pow_zero]
rfl
· rw [replicate_succ, prod_cons, ih, pow_succ']
#align list.prod_replicate List.prod_replicate
#align list.sum_replicate List.sum_replicate
@[to_additive sum_eq_card_nsmul]
theorem prod_eq_pow_card (l : List M) (m : M) (h : ∀ x ∈ l, x = m) : l.prod = m ^ l.length := by
rw [← prod_replicate, ← List.eq_replicate.mpr ⟨rfl, h⟩]
#align list.prod_eq_pow_card List.prod_eq_pow_card
#align list.sum_eq_card_nsmul List.sum_eq_card_nsmul
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel (l : List ι) {r : M → N → Prop} {f : ι → M} {g : ι → N} (h₁ : r 1 1)
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃i a b⦄, r a b → r (f i * a) (g i * b)) : r (l.map f).prod (l.map g).prod :=
List.recOn l h₁ fun a l hl => by simp only [map_cons, prod_cons, h₂ hl]
#align list.prod_hom_rel List.prod_hom_rel
#align list.sum_hom_rel List.sum_hom_rel
@[to_additive]
theorem rel_prod {R : M → N → Prop} (h : R 1 1) (hf : (R ⇒ R ⇒ R) (· * ·) (· * ·)) :
(Forall₂ R ⇒ R) prod prod :=
rel_foldl hf h
#align list.rel_prod List.rel_prod
#align list.rel_sum List.rel_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom (l : List M) {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F) :
(l.map f).prod = f l.prod := by
simp only [prod, foldl_map, ← map_one f]
exact l.foldl_hom f (· * ·) (· * f ·) 1 (fun x y => (map_mul f x y).symm)
#align list.prod_hom List.prod_hom
#align list.sum_hom List.sum_hom
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : M → N → P) (hf : ∀ a b c d, f (a * b) (c * d) = f a c * f b d)
(hf' : f 1 1 = 1) (f₁ : ι → M) (f₂ : ι → N) :
(l.map fun i => f (f₁ i) (f₂ i)).prod = f (l.map f₁).prod (l.map f₂).prod := by
simp only [prod, foldl_map]
-- Porting note: next 3 lines used to be
-- convert l.foldl_hom₂ (fun a b => f a b) _ _ _ _ _ fun a b i => _
-- · exact hf'.symm
-- · exact hf _ _ _ _
rw [← l.foldl_hom₂ (fun a b => f a b), hf']
intros
exact hf _ _ _ _
#align list.prod_hom₂ List.prod_hom₂
#align list.sum_hom₂ List.sum_hom₂
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_map_mul {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {l : List ι} {f g : ι → α} :
(l.map fun i => f i * g i).prod = (l.map f).prod * (l.map g).prod :=
l.prod_hom₂ (· * ·) mul_mul_mul_comm (mul_one _) _ _
#align list.prod_map_mul List.prod_map_mul
#align list.sum_map_add List.sum_map_add
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_map_hom (L : List ι) (f : ι → M) {G : Type*} [FunLike G M N] [MonoidHomClass G M N]
(g : G) :
(L.map (g ∘ f)).prod = g (L.map f).prod := by rw [← prod_hom, map_map]
#align list.prod_map_hom List.prod_map_hom
#align list.sum_map_hom List.sum_map_hom
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_isUnit : ∀ {L : List M}, (∀ m ∈ L, IsUnit m) → IsUnit L.prod
| [], _ => by simp
| h :: t, u => by
simp only [List.prod_cons]
exact IsUnit.mul (u h (mem_cons_self h t)) (prod_isUnit fun m mt => u m (mem_cons_of_mem h mt))
#align list.prod_is_unit List.prod_isUnit
#align list.sum_is_add_unit List.sum_isAddUnit
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_isUnit_iff {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {L : List α} :
IsUnit L.prod ↔ ∀ m ∈ L, IsUnit m := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, prod_isUnit⟩
induction' L with m L ih
· exact fun m' h' => False.elim (not_mem_nil m' h')
rw [prod_cons, IsUnit.mul_iff] at h
exact fun m' h' => Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h') (fun H => H.substr h.1) fun H => ih h.2 _ H
#align list.prod_is_unit_iff List.prod_isUnit_iff
#align list.sum_is_add_unit_iff List.sum_isAddUnit_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_take_mul_prod_drop : ∀ (L : List M) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).prod * (L.drop i).prod = L.prod
| [], i => by simp [Nat.zero_le]
| L, 0 => by simp
| h :: t, n + 1 => by
dsimp
rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, mul_assoc, prod_take_mul_prod_drop t]
#align list.prod_take_mul_prod_drop List.prod_take_mul_prod_drop
#align list.sum_take_add_sum_drop List.sum_take_add_sum_drop
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_take_succ :
∀ (L : List M) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).prod = (L.take i).prod * L.get ⟨i, p⟩
| [], i, p => by cases p
| h :: t, 0, _ => rfl
| h :: t, n + 1, p => by
dsimp
rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, prod_take_succ t n (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ p), mul_assoc]
#align list.prod_take_succ List.prod_take_succ
#align list.sum_take_succ List.sum_take_succ
/-- A list with product not one must have positive length. -/
@[to_additive "A list with sum not zero must have positive length."]
theorem length_pos_of_prod_ne_one (L : List M) (h : L.prod ≠ 1) : 0 < L.length := by
cases L
· simp at h
· simp
#align list.length_pos_of_prod_ne_one List.length_pos_of_prod_ne_one
#align list.length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero List.length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero
/-- A list with product greater than one must have positive length. -/
@[to_additive length_pos_of_sum_pos "A list with positive sum must have positive length."]
theorem length_pos_of_one_lt_prod [Preorder M] (L : List M) (h : 1 < L.prod) : 0 < L.length :=
length_pos_of_prod_ne_one L h.ne'
#align list.length_pos_of_one_lt_prod List.length_pos_of_one_lt_prod
#align list.length_pos_of_sum_pos List.length_pos_of_sum_pos
/-- A list with product less than one must have positive length. -/
@[to_additive "A list with negative sum must have positive length."]
theorem length_pos_of_prod_lt_one [Preorder M] (L : List M) (h : L.prod < 1) : 0 < L.length :=
length_pos_of_prod_ne_one L h.ne
#align list.length_pos_of_prod_lt_one List.length_pos_of_prod_lt_one
#align list.length_pos_of_sum_neg List.length_pos_of_sum_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_set :
∀ (L : List M) (n : ℕ) (a : M),
(L.set n a).prod =
((L.take n).prod * if n < L.length then a else 1) * (L.drop (n + 1)).prod
| x :: xs, 0, a => by simp [set]
| x :: xs, i + 1, a => by
simp [set, prod_set xs i a, mul_assoc, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_lt_add_iff_right]
| [], _, _ => by simp [set, (Nat.zero_le _).not_lt, Nat.zero_le]
#align list.prod_update_nth List.prod_set
#align list.sum_update_nth List.sum_set
/-- We'd like to state this as `L.headI * L.tail.prod = L.prod`, but because `L.headI` relies on an
inhabited instance to return a garbage value on the empty list, this is not possible.
Instead, we write the statement in terms of `(L.get? 0).getD 1`.
-/
@[to_additive "We'd like to state this as `L.headI + L.tail.sum = L.sum`, but because `L.headI`
relies on an inhabited instance to return a garbage value on the empty list, this is not possible.
Instead, we write the statement in terms of `(L.get? 0).getD 0`."]
theorem get?_zero_mul_tail_prod (l : List M) : (l.get? 0).getD 1 * l.tail.prod = l.prod := by
cases l <;> simp
#align list.nth_zero_mul_tail_prod List.get?_zero_mul_tail_prod
#align list.nth_zero_add_tail_sum List.get?_zero_add_tail_sum
/-- Same as `get?_zero_mul_tail_prod`, but avoiding the `List.headI` garbage complication by
requiring the list to be nonempty. -/
@[to_additive "Same as `get?_zero_add_tail_sum`, but avoiding the `List.headI` garbage complication
by requiring the list to be nonempty."]
theorem headI_mul_tail_prod_of_ne_nil [Inhabited M] (l : List M) (h : l ≠ []) :
l.headI * l.tail.prod = l.prod := by cases l <;> [contradiction; simp]
#align list.head_mul_tail_prod_of_ne_nil List.headI_mul_tail_prod_of_ne_nil
#align list.head_add_tail_sum_of_ne_nil List.headI_add_tail_sum_of_ne_nil
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Commute.list_prod_right (l : List M) (y : M) (h : ∀ x ∈ l, Commute y x) :
Commute y l.prod := by
induction' l with z l IH
· simp
· rw [List.forall_mem_cons] at h
rw [List.prod_cons]
exact Commute.mul_right h.1 (IH h.2)
#align commute.list_prod_right Commute.list_prod_right
#align add_commute.list_sum_right AddCommute.list_sum_right
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Commute.list_prod_left (l : List M) (y : M) (h : ∀ x ∈ l, Commute x y) :
Commute l.prod y :=
((Commute.list_prod_right _ _) fun _ hx => (h _ hx).symm).symm
#align commute.list_prod_left Commute.list_prod_left
#align add_commute.list_sum_left AddCommute.list_sum_left
@[to_additive] lemma prod_range_succ (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
((range n.succ).map f).prod = ((range n).map f).prod * f n := by
rw [range_succ, map_append, map_singleton, prod_append, prod_cons, prod_nil, mul_one]
#align list.prod_range_succ List.prod_range_succ
#align list.sum_range_succ List.sum_range_succ
/-- A variant of `prod_range_succ` which pulls off the first term in the product rather than the
last. -/
@[to_additive
"A variant of `sum_range_succ` which pulls off the first term in the sum rather than the last."]
lemma prod_range_succ' (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
((range n.succ).map f).prod = f 0 * ((range n).map fun i ↦ f i.succ).prod :=
Nat.recOn n (show 1 * f 0 = f 0 * 1 by rw [one_mul, mul_one]) fun _ hd => by
rw [List.prod_range_succ, hd, mul_assoc, ← List.prod_range_succ]
#align list.prod_range_succ' List.prod_range_succ'
#align list.sum_range_succ' List.sum_range_succ'
@[to_additive] lemma prod_eq_one (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x = 1) : l.prod = 1 := by
induction' l with i l hil
· rfl
rw [List.prod_cons, hil fun x hx ↦ hl _ (mem_cons_of_mem i hx), hl _ (mem_cons_self i l), one_mul]
#align list.prod_eq_one List.prod_eq_one
#align list.sum_eq_zero List.sum_eq_zero
@[to_additive] lemma exists_mem_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one (h : l.prod ≠ 1) :
∃ x ∈ l, x ≠ (1 : M) := by simpa only [not_forall, exists_prop] using mt prod_eq_one h
#align list.exists_mem_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one List.exists_mem_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one
#align list.exists_mem_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero List.exists_mem_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_erase_of_comm [DecidableEq M] (ha : a ∈ l) (comm : ∀ x ∈ l, ∀ y ∈ l, x * y = y * x) :
a * (l.erase a).prod = l.prod := by
induction' l with b l ih
· simp only [not_mem_nil] at ha
obtain rfl | ⟨ne, h⟩ := List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem ha
· simp only [erase_cons_head, prod_cons]
rw [List.erase, beq_false_of_ne ne.symm, List.prod_cons, List.prod_cons, ← mul_assoc,
comm a ha b (l.mem_cons_self b), mul_assoc,
ih h fun x hx y hy ↦ comm _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem b hx) _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem b hy)]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_map_eq_pow_single [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} (a : α) (f : α → M)
(hf : ∀ a', a' ≠ a → a' ∈ l → f a' = 1) : (l.map f).prod = f a ^ l.count a := by
induction' l with a' as h generalizing a
· rw [map_nil, prod_nil, count_nil, _root_.pow_zero]
· specialize h a fun a' ha' hfa' => hf a' ha' (mem_cons_of_mem _ hfa')
rw [List.map_cons, List.prod_cons, count_cons, h]
split_ifs with ha'
· rw [ha', _root_.pow_succ']
· rw [hf a' (Ne.symm ha') (List.mem_cons_self a' as), one_mul, add_zero]
#align list.prod_map_eq_pow_single List.prod_map_eq_pow_single
#align list.sum_map_eq_nsmul_single List.sum_map_eq_nsmul_single
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_eq_pow_single [DecidableEq M] (a : M) (h : ∀ a', a' ≠ a → a' ∈ l → a' = 1) :
l.prod = a ^ l.count a :=
_root_.trans (by rw [map_id]) (prod_map_eq_pow_single a id h)
#align list.prod_eq_pow_single List.prod_eq_pow_single
#align list.sum_eq_nsmul_single List.sum_eq_nsmul_single
/-- If elements of a list commute with each other, then their product does not
depend on the order of elements. -/
@[to_additive "If elements of a list additively commute with each other, then their sum does not
depend on the order of elements."]
lemma Perm.prod_eq' (h : l₁ ~ l₂) (hc : l₁.Pairwise Commute) : l₁.prod = l₂.prod := by
refine h.foldl_eq' ?_ _
apply Pairwise.forall_of_forall
· intro x y h z
exact (h z).symm
· intros; rfl
· apply hc.imp
intro a b h z
rw [mul_assoc z, mul_assoc z, h]
#align list.perm.prod_eq' List.Perm.prod_eq'
#align list.perm.sum_eq' List.Perm.sum_eq'
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {a : M} {l l₁ l₂ : List M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_erase [DecidableEq M] (ha : a ∈ l) : a * (l.erase a).prod = l.prod :=
prod_erase_of_comm ha fun x _ y _ ↦ mul_comm x y
#align list.prod_erase List.prod_erase
#align list.sum_erase List.sum_erase
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_map_erase [DecidableEq α] (f : α → M) {a} :
∀ {l : List α}, a ∈ l → f a * ((l.erase a).map f).prod = (l.map f).prod
| b :: l, h => by
obtain rfl | ⟨ne, h⟩ := List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem h
· simp only [map, erase_cons_head, prod_cons]
· simp only [map, erase_cons_tail _ (not_beq_of_ne ne.symm), prod_cons, prod_map_erase _ h,
mul_left_comm (f a) (f b)]
#align list.prod_map_erase List.prod_map_erase
#align list.sum_map_erase List.sum_map_erase
@[to_additive] lemma Perm.prod_eq (h : Perm l₁ l₂) : prod l₁ = prod l₂ := h.fold_op_eq
#align list.perm.prod_eq List.Perm.prod_eq
#align list.perm.sum_eq List.Perm.sum_eq
@[to_additive] lemma prod_reverse (l : List M) : prod l.reverse = prod l := (reverse_perm l).prod_eq
#align list.prod_reverse List.prod_reverse
#align list.sum_reverse List.sum_reverse
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mul_prod_eq_prod_zipWith_mul_prod_drop :
∀ l l' : List M,
l.prod * l'.prod =
(zipWith (· * ·) l l').prod * (l.drop l'.length).prod * (l'.drop l.length).prod
| [], ys => by simp [Nat.zero_le]
| xs, [] => by simp [Nat.zero_le]
| x :: xs, y :: ys => by
simp only [drop, length, zipWith_cons_cons, prod_cons]
conv =>
lhs; rw [mul_assoc]; right; rw [mul_comm, mul_assoc]; right
rw [mul_comm, prod_mul_prod_eq_prod_zipWith_mul_prod_drop xs ys]
simp [mul_assoc]
#align list.prod_mul_prod_eq_prod_zip_with_mul_prod_drop List.prod_mul_prod_eq_prod_zipWith_mul_prod_drop
#align list.sum_add_sum_eq_sum_zip_with_add_sum_drop List.sum_add_sum_eq_sum_zipWith_add_sum_drop
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mul_prod_eq_prod_zipWith_of_length_eq (l l' : List M) (h : l.length = l'.length) :
l.prod * l'.prod = (zipWith (· * ·) l l').prod := by
apply (prod_mul_prod_eq_prod_zipWith_mul_prod_drop l l').trans
rw [← h, drop_length, h, drop_length, prod_nil, mul_one, mul_one]
#align list.prod_mul_prod_eq_prod_zip_with_of_length_eq List.prod_mul_prod_eq_prod_zipWith_of_length_eq
#align list.sum_add_sum_eq_sum_zip_with_of_length_eq List.sum_add_sum_eq_sum_zipWith_of_length_eq
end CommMonoid
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_prod_take_eq [LeftCancelMonoid M] {L L' : List M} (h : L.length = L'.length)
(h' : ∀ i ≤ L.length, (L.take i).prod = (L'.take i).prod) : L = L' := by
refine ext_get h fun i h₁ h₂ => ?_
have : (L.take (i + 1)).prod = (L'.take (i + 1)).prod := h' _ (Nat.succ_le_of_lt h₁)
rw [prod_take_succ L i h₁, prod_take_succ L' i h₂, h' i (le_of_lt h₁)] at this
convert mul_left_cancel this
#align list.eq_of_prod_take_eq List.eq_of_prod_take_eq
#align list.eq_of_sum_take_eq List.eq_of_sum_take_eq
section Group
variable [Group G]
/-- This is the `List.prod` version of `mul_inv_rev` -/
@[to_additive "This is the `List.sum` version of `add_neg_rev`"]
theorem prod_inv_reverse : ∀ L : List G, L.prod⁻¹ = (L.map fun x => x⁻¹).reverse.prod
| [] => by simp
| x :: xs => by simp [prod_inv_reverse xs]
#align list.prod_inv_reverse List.prod_inv_reverse
#align list.sum_neg_reverse List.sum_neg_reverse
/-- A non-commutative variant of `List.prod_reverse` -/
@[to_additive "A non-commutative variant of `List.sum_reverse`"]
theorem prod_reverse_noncomm : ∀ L : List G, L.reverse.prod = (L.map fun x => x⁻¹).prod⁻¹ := by
simp [prod_inv_reverse]
#align list.prod_reverse_noncomm List.prod_reverse_noncomm
#align list.sum_reverse_noncomm List.sum_reverse_noncomm
/-- Counterpart to `List.prod_take_succ` when we have an inverse operation -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"Counterpart to `List.sum_take_succ` when we have a negation operation"]
theorem prod_drop_succ :
∀ (L : List G) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.drop (i + 1)).prod = (L.get ⟨i, p⟩)⁻¹ * (L.drop i).prod
| [], i, p => False.elim (Nat.not_lt_zero _ p)
| x :: xs, 0, _ => by simp
| x :: xs, i + 1, p => prod_drop_succ xs i _
#align list.prod_drop_succ List.prod_drop_succ
#align list.sum_drop_succ List.sum_drop_succ
/-- Cancellation of a telescoping product. -/
@[to_additive "Cancellation of a telescoping sum."]
theorem prod_range_div' (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → G) :
((range n).map fun k ↦ f k / f (k + 1)).prod = f 0 / f n := by
induction' n with n h
· exact (div_self' (f 0)).symm
· rw [range_succ, map_append, map_singleton, prod_append, prod_singleton, h, div_mul_div_cancel']
lemma prod_rotate_eq_one_of_prod_eq_one :
∀ {l : List G} (_ : l.prod = 1) (n : ℕ), (l.rotate n).prod = 1
| [], _, _ => by simp
| a :: l, hl, n => by
have : n % List.length (a :: l) ≤ List.length (a :: l) := le_of_lt (Nat.mod_lt _ (by simp))
rw [← List.take_append_drop (n % List.length (a :: l)) (a :: l)] at hl;
rw [← rotate_mod, rotate_eq_drop_append_take this, List.prod_append, mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq, ←
one_mul (List.prod _)⁻¹, ← hl, List.prod_append, mul_assoc, mul_inv_self, mul_one]
#align list.prod_rotate_eq_one_of_prod_eq_one List.prod_rotate_eq_one_of_prod_eq_one
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup G]
/-- This is the `List.prod` version of `mul_inv` -/
@[to_additive "This is the `List.sum` version of `add_neg`"]
theorem prod_inv : ∀ L : List G, L.prod⁻¹ = (L.map fun x => x⁻¹).prod
| [] => by simp
| x :: xs => by simp [mul_comm, prod_inv xs]
#align list.prod_inv List.prod_inv
#align list.sum_neg List.sum_neg
/-- Cancellation of a telescoping product. -/
@[to_additive "Cancellation of a telescoping sum."]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Group/List.lean | 527 | 530 | theorem prod_range_div (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → G) :
((range n).map fun k ↦ f (k + 1) / f k).prod = f n / f 0 := by |
have h : ((·⁻¹) ∘ fun k ↦ f (k + 1) / f k) = fun k ↦ f k / f (k + 1) := by ext; apply inv_div
rw [← inv_inj, prod_inv, map_map, inv_div, h, prod_range_div']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearPMap
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Basic
#align_import topology.algebra.module.linear_pmap from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Partially defined linear operators over topological vector spaces
We define basic notions of partially defined linear operators, which we call unbounded operators
for short.
In this file we prove all elementary properties of unbounded operators that do not assume that the
underlying spaces are normed.
## Main definitions
* `LinearPMap.IsClosed`: An unbounded operator is closed iff its graph is closed.
* `LinearPMap.IsClosable`: An unbounded operator is closable iff the closure of its graph is a
graph.
* `LinearPMap.closure`: For a closable unbounded operator `f : LinearPMap R E F` the closure is
the smallest closed extension of `f`. If `f` is not closable, then `f.closure` is defined as `f`.
* `LinearPMap.HasCore`: a submodule contained in the domain is a core if restricting to the core
does not lose information about the unbounded operator.
## Main statements
* `LinearPMap.closable_iff_exists_closed_extension`: an unbounded operator is closable iff it has a
closed extension.
* `LinearPMap.closable.exists_unique`: there exists a unique closure
* `LinearPMap.closureHasCore`: the domain of `f` is a core of its closure
## References
* [J. Weidmann, *Linear Operators in Hilbert Spaces*][weidmann_linear]
## Tags
Unbounded operators, closed operators
-/
open Topology
variable {R E F : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F]
variable [Module R E] [Module R F]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
namespace LinearPMap
/-! ### Closed and closable operators -/
/-- An unbounded operator is closed iff its graph is closed. -/
def IsClosed (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Prop :=
_root_.IsClosed (f.graph : Set (E × F))
#align linear_pmap.is_closed LinearPMap.IsClosed
variable [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousAdd F]
variable [TopologicalSpace R] [ContinuousSMul R E] [ContinuousSMul R F]
/-- An unbounded operator is closable iff the closure of its graph is a graph. -/
def IsClosable (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Prop :=
∃ f' : LinearPMap R E F, f.graph.topologicalClosure = f'.graph
#align linear_pmap.is_closable LinearPMap.IsClosable
/-- A closed operator is trivially closable. -/
theorem IsClosed.isClosable {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosed) : f.IsClosable :=
⟨f, hf.submodule_topologicalClosure_eq⟩
#align linear_pmap.is_closed.is_closable LinearPMap.IsClosed.isClosable
/-- If `g` has a closable extension `f`, then `g` itself is closable. -/
theorem IsClosable.leIsClosable {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) (hfg : g ≤ f) :
g.IsClosable := by
cases' hf with f' hf
have : g.graph.topologicalClosure ≤ f'.graph := by
rw [← hf]
exact Submodule.topologicalClosure_mono (le_graph_of_le hfg)
use g.graph.topologicalClosure.toLinearPMap
rw [Submodule.toLinearPMap_graph_eq]
exact fun _ hx hx' => f'.graph_fst_eq_zero_snd (this hx) hx'
#align linear_pmap.is_closable.le_is_closable LinearPMap.IsClosable.leIsClosable
/-- The closure is unique. -/
theorem IsClosable.existsUnique {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) :
∃! f' : E →ₗ.[R] F, f.graph.topologicalClosure = f'.graph := by
refine exists_unique_of_exists_of_unique hf fun _ _ hy₁ hy₂ => eq_of_eq_graph ?_
rw [← hy₁, ← hy₂]
#align linear_pmap.is_closable.exists_unique LinearPMap.IsClosable.existsUnique
open scoped Classical
/-- If `f` is closable, then `f.closure` is the closure. Otherwise it is defined
as `f.closure = f`. -/
noncomputable def closure (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
if hf : f.IsClosable then hf.choose else f
#align linear_pmap.closure LinearPMap.closure
theorem closure_def {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) : f.closure = hf.choose := by
simp [closure, hf]
#align linear_pmap.closure_def LinearPMap.closure_def
theorem closure_def' {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : ¬f.IsClosable) : f.closure = f := by simp [closure, hf]
#align linear_pmap.closure_def' LinearPMap.closure_def'
/-- The closure (as a submodule) of the graph is equal to the graph of the closure
(as a `LinearPMap`). -/
theorem IsClosable.graph_closure_eq_closure_graph {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) :
f.graph.topologicalClosure = f.closure.graph := by
rw [closure_def hf]
exact hf.choose_spec
#align linear_pmap.is_closable.graph_closure_eq_closure_graph LinearPMap.IsClosable.graph_closure_eq_closure_graph
/-- A `LinearPMap` is contained in its closure. -/
theorem le_closure (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : f ≤ f.closure := by
by_cases hf : f.IsClosable
· refine le_of_le_graph ?_
rw [← hf.graph_closure_eq_closure_graph]
exact (graph f).le_topologicalClosure
rw [closure_def' hf]
#align linear_pmap.le_closure LinearPMap.le_closure
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/LinearPMap.lean | 127 | 132 | theorem IsClosable.closure_mono {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hg : g.IsClosable) (h : f ≤ g) :
f.closure ≤ g.closure := by |
refine le_of_le_graph ?_
rw [← (hg.leIsClosable h).graph_closure_eq_closure_graph]
rw [← hg.graph_closure_eq_closure_graph]
exact Submodule.topologicalClosure_mono (le_graph_of_le h)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.LinearMap
/-!
# `map` and `comap` for `Submodule`s
## Main declarations
* `Submodule.map`: The pushforward of a submodule `p ⊆ M` by `f : M → M₂`
* `Submodule.comap`: The pullback of a submodule `p ⊆ M₂` along `f : M → M₂`
* `Submodule.giMapComap`: `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisInsertion` when `f` is surjective.
* `Submodule.gciMapComap`: `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisCoinsertion` when `f` is injective.
## Tags
submodule, subspace, linear map, pushforward, pullback
-/
open Function Pointwise Set
variable {R : Type*} {R₁ : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {R₃ : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M₁ : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} {M₃ : Type*}
namespace Submodule
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {σ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {σ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃]
variable (p p' : Submodule R M) (q q' : Submodule R₂ M₂)
variable {x : M}
section
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
/-- The pushforward of a submodule `p ⊆ M` by `f : M → M₂` -/
def map (f : F) (p : Submodule R M) : Submodule R₂ M₂ :=
{ p.toAddSubmonoid.map f with
carrier := f '' p
smul_mem' := by
rintro c x ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := σ₁₂.surjective c
exact ⟨_, p.smul_mem a hy, map_smulₛₗ f _ _⟩ }
#align submodule.map Submodule.map
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (f : F) (p : Submodule R M) : (map f p : Set M₂) = f '' p :=
rfl
#align submodule.map_coe Submodule.map_coe
theorem map_toAddSubmonoid (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (p : Submodule R M) :
(p.map f).toAddSubmonoid = p.toAddSubmonoid.map (f : M →+ M₂) :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
#align submodule.map_to_add_submonoid Submodule.map_toAddSubmonoid
theorem map_toAddSubmonoid' (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (p : Submodule R M) :
(p.map f).toAddSubmonoid = p.toAddSubmonoid.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
#align submodule.map_to_add_submonoid' Submodule.map_toAddSubmonoid'
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap_map {A A₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup A] [AddCommGroup A₂]
(f : A →+ A₂) (s : AddSubgroup A) :
(AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule s).map f.toIntLinearMap =
AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule (s.map f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MonoidHom.coe_toAdditive_map {G G₂ : Type*} [Group G] [Group G₂] (f : G →* G₂)
(s : Subgroup G) :
s.toAddSubgroup.map (MonoidHom.toAdditive f) = Subgroup.toAddSubgroup (s.map f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.coe_toMultiplicative_map {G G₂ : Type*} [AddGroup G] [AddGroup G₂]
(f : G →+ G₂) (s : AddSubgroup G) :
s.toSubgroup.map (AddMonoidHom.toMultiplicative f) = AddSubgroup.toSubgroup (s.map f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} {x : M₂} : x ∈ map f p ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ p ∧ f y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align submodule.mem_map Submodule.mem_map
theorem mem_map_of_mem {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} {r} (h : r ∈ p) : f r ∈ map f p :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
#align submodule.mem_map_of_mem Submodule.mem_map_of_mem
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) {p : Submodule R M} (r : p) : f r ∈ map f p :=
mem_map_of_mem r.prop
#align submodule.apply_coe_mem_map Submodule.apply_coe_mem_map
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) p = p :=
Submodule.ext fun a => by simp
#align submodule.map_id Submodule.map_id
theorem map_comp [RingHomSurjective σ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective σ₁₃] (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂)
(g : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃) (p : Submodule R M) : map (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] M₃) p = map g (map f p) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp only [← image_comp, map_coe, LinearMap.coe_comp, comp_apply]
#align submodule.map_comp Submodule.map_comp
theorem map_mono {f : F} {p p' : Submodule R M} : p ≤ p' → map f p ≤ map f p' :=
image_subset _
#align submodule.map_mono Submodule.map_mono
@[simp]
theorem map_zero : map (0 : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) p = ⊥ :=
have : ∃ x : M, x ∈ p := ⟨0, p.zero_mem⟩
ext <| by simp [this, eq_comm]
#align submodule.map_zero Submodule.map_zero
theorem map_add_le (f g : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) : map (f + g) p ≤ map f p ⊔ map g p := by
rintro x ⟨m, hm, rfl⟩
exact add_mem_sup (mem_map_of_mem hm) (mem_map_of_mem hm)
#align submodule.map_add_le Submodule.map_add_le
theorem map_inf_le (f : F) {p q : Submodule R M} :
(p ⊓ q).map f ≤ p.map f ⊓ q.map f :=
image_inter_subset f p q
theorem map_inf (f : F) {p q : Submodule R M} (hf : Injective f) :
(p ⊓ q).map f = p.map f ⊓ q.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_inter hf
theorem range_map_nonempty (N : Submodule R M) :
(Set.range (fun ϕ => Submodule.map ϕ N : (M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) → Submodule R₂ M₂)).Nonempty :=
⟨_, Set.mem_range.mpr ⟨0, rfl⟩⟩
#align submodule.range_map_nonempty Submodule.range_map_nonempty
end
section SemilinearMap
variable {σ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} [RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
/-- The pushforward of a submodule by an injective linear map is
linearly equivalent to the original submodule. See also `LinearEquiv.submoduleMap` for a
computable version when `f` has an explicit inverse. -/
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (f : F) (i : Injective f) (p : Submodule R M) :
p ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] p.map f :=
{ Equiv.Set.image f p i with
map_add' := by
intros
simp only [coe_add, map_add, Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.Set.image_apply]
rfl
map_smul' := by
intros
-- Note: #8386 changed `map_smulₛₗ` into `map_smulₛₗ _`
simp only [coe_smul_of_tower, map_smulₛₗ _, Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.Set.image_apply]
rfl }
#align submodule.equiv_map_of_injective Submodule.equivMapOfInjective
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply (f : F) (i : Injective f) (p : Submodule R M) (x : p) :
(equivMapOfInjective f i p x : M₂) = f x :=
rfl
#align submodule.coe_equiv_map_of_injective_apply Submodule.coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply
@[simp]
theorem map_equivMapOfInjective_symm_apply (f : F) (i : Injective f) (p : Submodule R M)
(x : p.map f) : f ((equivMapOfInjective f i p).symm x) = x := by
rw [← LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply (equivMapOfInjective f i p) x, coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply,
i.eq_iff, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
/-- The pullback of a submodule `p ⊆ M₂` along `f : M → M₂` -/
def comap (f : F) (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) : Submodule R M :=
{ p.toAddSubmonoid.comap f with
carrier := f ⁻¹' p
-- Note: #8386 added `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul_mem' := fun a x h => by simp [p.smul_mem (σ₁₂ a) h, map_smulₛₗ _] }
#align submodule.comap Submodule.comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_coe (f : F) (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) : (comap f p : Set M) = f ⁻¹' p :=
rfl
#align submodule.comap_coe Submodule.comap_coe
@[simp]
theorem AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap_comap {A A₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup A] [AddCommGroup A₂]
(f : A →+ A₂) (s : AddSubgroup A₂) :
(AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule s).comap f.toIntLinearMap =
AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule (s.comap f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂} : x ∈ comap f p ↔ f x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
#align submodule.mem_comap Submodule.mem_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : comap (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) p = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
#align submodule.comap_id Submodule.comap_id
theorem comap_comp (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃) (p : Submodule R₃ M₃) :
comap (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] M₃) p = comap f (comap g p) :=
rfl
#align submodule.comap_comp Submodule.comap_comp
theorem comap_mono {f : F} {q q' : Submodule R₂ M₂} : q ≤ q' → comap f q ≤ comap f q' :=
preimage_mono
#align submodule.comap_mono Submodule.comap_mono
theorem le_comap_pow_of_le_comap (p : Submodule R M) {f : M →ₗ[R] M} (h : p ≤ p.comap f) (k : ℕ) :
p ≤ p.comap (f ^ k) := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp [LinearMap.one_eq_id]
· simp [LinearMap.iterate_succ, comap_comp, h.trans (comap_mono ih)]
#align submodule.le_comap_pow_of_le_comap Submodule.le_comap_pow_of_le_comap
section
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂]
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} {q : Submodule R₂ M₂} :
map f p ≤ q ↔ p ≤ comap f q :=
image_subset_iff
#align submodule.map_le_iff_le_comap Submodule.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem gc_map_comap (f : F) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)
| _, _ => map_le_iff_le_comap
#align submodule.gc_map_comap Submodule.gc_map_comap
@[simp]
theorem map_bot (f : F) : map f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
#align submodule.map_bot Submodule.map_bot
@[simp]
theorem map_sup (f : F) : map f (p ⊔ p') = map f p ⊔ map f p' :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
#align submodule.map_sup Submodule.map_sup
@[simp]
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : F) (p : ι → Submodule R M) :
map f (⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, map f (p i) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
#align submodule.map_supr Submodule.map_iSup
end
@[simp]
theorem comap_top (f : F) : comap f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align submodule.comap_top Submodule.comap_top
@[simp]
theorem comap_inf (f : F) : comap f (q ⊓ q') = comap f q ⊓ comap f q' :=
rfl
#align submodule.comap_inf Submodule.comap_inf
@[simp]
theorem comap_iInf [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {ι : Sort*} (f : F) (p : ι → Submodule R₂ M₂) :
comap f (⨅ i, p i) = ⨅ i, comap f (p i) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
#align submodule.comap_infi Submodule.comap_iInf
@[simp]
theorem comap_zero : comap (0 : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) q = ⊤ :=
ext <| by simp
#align submodule.comap_zero Submodule.comap_zero
theorem map_comap_le [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] (f : F) (q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
map f (comap f q) ≤ q :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
#align submodule.map_comap_le Submodule.map_comap_le
theorem le_comap_map [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] (f : F) (p : Submodule R M) : p ≤ comap f (map f p) :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
#align submodule.le_comap_map Submodule.le_comap_map
section GaloisInsertion
variable {f : F} (hf : Surjective f)
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂]
/-- `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisInsertion` when `f` is surjective. -/
def giMapComap : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).toGaloisInsertion fun S x hx => by
rcases hf x with ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_map, mem_comap]
exact ⟨y, hx, rfl⟩
#align submodule.gi_map_comap Submodule.giMapComap
theorem map_comap_eq_of_surjective (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) : (p.comap f).map f = p :=
(giMapComap hf).l_u_eq _
#align submodule.map_comap_eq_of_surjective Submodule.map_comap_eq_of_surjective
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Function.Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap hf).l_surjective
#align submodule.map_surjective_of_surjective Submodule.map_surjective_of_surjective
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Function.Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap hf).u_injective
#align submodule.comap_injective_of_surjective Submodule.comap_injective_of_surjective
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (p q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(p.comap f ⊔ q.comap f).map f = p ⊔ q :=
(giMapComap hf).l_sup_u _ _
#align submodule.map_sup_comap_of_surjective Submodule.map_sup_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_sujective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(⨆ i, (S i).comap f).map f = iSup S :=
(giMapComap hf).l_iSup_u _
#align submodule.map_supr_comap_of_sujective Submodule.map_iSup_comap_of_sujective
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (p q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(p.comap f ⊓ q.comap f).map f = p ⊓ q :=
(giMapComap hf).l_inf_u _ _
#align submodule.map_inf_comap_of_surjective Submodule.map_inf_comap_of_surjective
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(⨅ i, (S i).comap f).map f = iInf S :=
(giMapComap hf).l_iInf_u _
#align submodule.map_infi_comap_of_surjective Submodule.map_iInf_comap_of_surjective
theorem comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective (p q : Submodule R₂ M₂) : p.comap f ≤ q.comap f ↔ p ≤ q :=
(giMapComap hf).u_le_u_iff
#align submodule.comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective Submodule.comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective
theorem comap_strictMono_of_surjective : StrictMono (comap f) :=
(giMapComap hf).strictMono_u
#align submodule.comap_strict_mono_of_surjective Submodule.comap_strictMono_of_surjective
end GaloisInsertion
section GaloisCoinsertion
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {f : F} (hf : Injective f)
/-- `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisCoinsertion` when `f` is injective. -/
def gciMapComap : GaloisCoinsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).toGaloisCoinsertion fun S x => by
simp [mem_comap, mem_map, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro y hy hxy
rw [hf.eq_iff] at hxy
rwa [← hxy]
#align submodule.gci_map_comap Submodule.gciMapComap
theorem comap_map_eq_of_injective (p : Submodule R M) : (p.map f).comap f = p :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_l_eq _
#align submodule.comap_map_eq_of_injective Submodule.comap_map_eq_of_injective
theorem comap_surjective_of_injective : Function.Surjective (comap f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_surjective
#align submodule.comap_surjective_of_injective Submodule.comap_surjective_of_injective
theorem map_injective_of_injective : Function.Injective (map f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).l_injective
#align submodule.map_injective_of_injective Submodule.map_injective_of_injective
theorem comap_inf_map_of_injective (p q : Submodule R M) : (p.map f ⊓ q.map f).comap f = p ⊓ q :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_inf_l _ _
#align submodule.comap_inf_map_of_injective Submodule.comap_inf_map_of_injective
theorem comap_iInf_map_of_injective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R M) :
(⨅ i, (S i).map f).comap f = iInf S :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_iInf_l _
#align submodule.comap_infi_map_of_injective Submodule.comap_iInf_map_of_injective
theorem comap_sup_map_of_injective (p q : Submodule R M) : (p.map f ⊔ q.map f).comap f = p ⊔ q :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_sup_l _ _
#align submodule.comap_sup_map_of_injective Submodule.comap_sup_map_of_injective
theorem comap_iSup_map_of_injective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R M) :
(⨆ i, (S i).map f).comap f = iSup S :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_iSup_l _
#align submodule.comap_supr_map_of_injective Submodule.comap_iSup_map_of_injective
theorem map_le_map_iff_of_injective (p q : Submodule R M) : p.map f ≤ q.map f ↔ p ≤ q :=
(gciMapComap hf).l_le_l_iff
#align submodule.map_le_map_iff_of_injective Submodule.map_le_map_iff_of_injective
theorem map_strictMono_of_injective : StrictMono (map f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).strictMono_l
#align submodule.map_strict_mono_of_injective Submodule.map_strictMono_of_injective
end GaloisCoinsertion
end SemilinearMap
section OrderIso
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {F : Type*}
/-- A linear isomorphism induces an order isomorphism of submodules. -/
@[simps symm_apply apply]
def orderIsoMapComapOfBijective [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
(f : F) (hf : Bijective f) : Submodule R M ≃o Submodule R₂ M₂ where
toFun := map f
invFun := comap f
left_inv := comap_map_eq_of_injective hf.injective
right_inv := map_comap_eq_of_surjective hf.surjective
map_rel_iff' := map_le_map_iff_of_injective hf.injective _ _
/-- A linear isomorphism induces an order isomorphism of submodules. -/
@[simps! symm_apply apply]
def orderIsoMapComap [EquivLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂] (f : F) :
Submodule R M ≃o Submodule R₂ M₂ := orderIsoMapComapOfBijective f (EquivLike.bijective f)
#align submodule.order_iso_map_comap Submodule.orderIsoMapComap
end OrderIso
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
--TODO(Mario): is there a way to prove this from order properties?
theorem map_inf_eq_map_inf_comap [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R M}
{p' : Submodule R₂ M₂} : map f p ⊓ p' = map f (p ⊓ comap f p') :=
le_antisymm (by rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h₁, rfl⟩, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩)
(le_inf (map_mono inf_le_left) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 inf_le_right))
#align submodule.map_inf_eq_map_inf_comap Submodule.map_inf_eq_map_inf_comap
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_subtype : map p.subtype (comap p.subtype p') = p ⊓ p' :=
ext fun x => ⟨by rintro ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, h₂, rfl⟩; exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, h₂, rfl⟩⟩
#align submodule.map_comap_subtype Submodule.map_comap_subtype
theorem eq_zero_of_bot_submodule : ∀ b : (⊥ : Submodule R M), b = 0
| ⟨b', hb⟩ => Subtype.eq <| show b' = 0 from (mem_bot R).1 hb
#align submodule.eq_zero_of_bot_submodule Submodule.eq_zero_of_bot_submodule
/-- The infimum of a family of invariant submodule of an endomorphism is also an invariant
submodule. -/
theorem _root_.LinearMap.iInf_invariant {σ : R →+* R} [RingHomSurjective σ] {ι : Sort*}
(f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M) {p : ι → Submodule R M} (hf : ∀ i, ∀ v ∈ p i, f v ∈ p i) :
∀ v ∈ iInf p, f v ∈ iInf p := by
have : ∀ i, (p i).map f ≤ p i := by
rintro i - ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
exact hf i v hv
suffices (iInf p).map f ≤ iInf p by exact fun v hv => this ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
exact le_iInf fun i => (Submodule.map_mono (iInf_le p i)).trans (this i)
#align linear_map.infi_invariant LinearMap.iInf_invariant
theorem disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot {p q : Submodule R M} : Disjoint p q ↔ comap p.subtype q = ⊥ := by
rw [← (map_injective_of_injective (show Injective p.subtype from Subtype.coe_injective)).eq_iff,
map_comap_subtype, map_bot, disjoint_iff]
#align submodule.disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot Submodule.disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (p : Submodule R M)
variable [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂]
@[simp]
protected theorem map_neg (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : map (-f) p = map f p :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨x, hx, hy⟩ => hy ▸ ⟨-x, show -x ∈ p from neg_mem hx, map_neg f x⟩, fun ⟨x, hx, hy⟩ =>
hy ▸ ⟨-x, show -x ∈ p from neg_mem hx, (map_neg (-f) _).trans (neg_neg (f x))⟩⟩
#align submodule.map_neg Submodule.map_neg
@[simp]
lemma comap_neg {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : Submodule R M₂} :
p.comap (-f) = p.comap f := by
ext; simp
end AddCommGroup
end Submodule
namespace Submodule
variable {K : Type*} {V : Type*} {V₂ : Type*}
variable [Semifield K]
variable [AddCommMonoid V] [Module K V]
variable [AddCommMonoid V₂] [Module K V₂]
theorem comap_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : Submodule K V₂) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) :
p.comap (a • f) = p.comap f := by
ext b; simp only [Submodule.mem_comap, p.smul_mem_iff h, LinearMap.smul_apply]
#align submodule.comap_smul Submodule.comap_smul
protected theorem map_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : Submodule K V) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) :
p.map (a • f) = p.map f :=
le_antisymm (by rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_smul f _ a h, ← map_le_iff_le_comap])
(by rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, ← comap_smul f _ a h, ← map_le_iff_le_comap])
#align submodule.map_smul Submodule.map_smul
theorem comap_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : Submodule K V₂) (a : K) :
p.comap (a • f) = ⨅ _ : a ≠ 0, p.comap f := by
classical by_cases h : a = 0 <;> simp [h, comap_smul]
#align submodule.comap_smul' Submodule.comap_smul'
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Map.lean | 494 | 496 | theorem map_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : Submodule K V) (a : K) :
p.map (a • f) = ⨆ _ : a ≠ 0, map f p := by |
classical by_cases h : a = 0 <;> simp [h, Submodule.map_smul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Combination
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Strict
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.PathConnected
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Affine
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Basic
#align_import analysis.convex.topology from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0e3aacdc98d25e0afe035c452d876d28cbffaa7e"
/-!
# Topological properties of convex sets
We prove the following facts:
* `Convex.interior` : interior of a convex set is convex;
* `Convex.closure` : closure of a convex set is convex;
* `Set.Finite.isCompact_convexHull` : convex hull of a finite set is compact;
* `Set.Finite.isClosed_convexHull` : convex hull of a finite set is closed.
-/
assert_not_exists Norm
open Metric Bornology Set Pointwise Convex
variable {ι 𝕜 E : Type*}
theorem Real.convex_iff_isPreconnected {s : Set ℝ} : Convex ℝ s ↔ IsPreconnected s :=
convex_iff_ordConnected.trans isPreconnected_iff_ordConnected.symm
#align real.convex_iff_is_preconnected Real.convex_iff_isPreconnected
alias ⟨_, IsPreconnected.convex⟩ := Real.convex_iff_isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected.convex IsPreconnected.convex
/-! ### Standard simplex -/
section stdSimplex
variable [Fintype ι]
/-- Every vector in `stdSimplex 𝕜 ι` has `max`-norm at most `1`. -/
theorem stdSimplex_subset_closedBall : stdSimplex ℝ ι ⊆ Metric.closedBall 0 1 := fun f hf ↦ by
rw [Metric.mem_closedBall, dist_pi_le_iff zero_le_one]
intro x
rw [Pi.zero_apply, Real.dist_0_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg <| hf.1 x]
exact (mem_Icc_of_mem_stdSimplex hf x).2
#align std_simplex_subset_closed_ball stdSimplex_subset_closedBall
variable (ι)
/-- `stdSimplex ℝ ι` is bounded. -/
theorem bounded_stdSimplex : IsBounded (stdSimplex ℝ ι) :=
(Metric.isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall 0).2 ⟨1, stdSimplex_subset_closedBall⟩
#align bounded_std_simplex bounded_stdSimplex
/-- `stdSimplex ℝ ι` is closed. -/
theorem isClosed_stdSimplex : IsClosed (stdSimplex ℝ ι) :=
(stdSimplex_eq_inter ℝ ι).symm ▸
IsClosed.inter (isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_le continuous_const (continuous_apply i))
(isClosed_eq (continuous_finset_sum _ fun x _ => continuous_apply x) continuous_const)
#align is_closed_std_simplex isClosed_stdSimplex
/-- `stdSimplex ℝ ι` is compact. -/
theorem isCompact_stdSimplex : IsCompact (stdSimplex ℝ ι) :=
Metric.isCompact_iff_isClosed_bounded.2 ⟨isClosed_stdSimplex ι, bounded_stdSimplex ι⟩
#align is_compact_std_simplex isCompact_stdSimplex
instance stdSimplex.instCompactSpace_coe : CompactSpace ↥(stdSimplex ℝ ι) :=
isCompact_iff_compactSpace.mp <| isCompact_stdSimplex _
/-- The standard one-dimensional simplex in `ℝ² = Fin 2 → ℝ`
is homeomorphic to the unit interval. -/
@[simps! (config := .asFn)]
def stdSimplexHomeomorphUnitInterval : stdSimplex ℝ (Fin 2) ≃ₜ unitInterval where
toEquiv := stdSimplexEquivIcc ℝ
continuous_toFun := .subtype_mk ((continuous_apply 0).comp continuous_subtype_val) _
continuous_invFun := by
apply Continuous.subtype_mk
exact (continuous_pi <| Fin.forall_fin_two.2
⟨continuous_subtype_val, continuous_const.sub continuous_subtype_val⟩)
end stdSimplex
/-! ### Topological vector spaces -/
section TopologicalSpace
variable [LinearOrderedRing 𝕜] [DenselyOrdered 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [Module 𝕜 E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
{x y : E}
theorem segment_subset_closure_openSegment : [x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ closure (openSegment 𝕜 x y) := by
rw [segment_eq_image, openSegment_eq_image, ← closure_Ioo (zero_ne_one' 𝕜)]
exact image_closure_subset_closure_image (by continuity)
#align segment_subset_closure_open_segment segment_subset_closure_openSegment
end TopologicalSpace
section PseudoMetricSpace
variable [LinearOrderedRing 𝕜] [DenselyOrdered 𝕜] [PseudoMetricSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜]
[ProperSpace 𝕜] [CompactIccSpace 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E] [T2Space E]
[ContinuousAdd E] [Module 𝕜 E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
@[simp]
theorem closure_openSegment (x y : E) : closure (openSegment 𝕜 x y) = [x -[𝕜] y] := by
rw [segment_eq_image, openSegment_eq_image, ← closure_Ioo (zero_ne_one' 𝕜)]
exact (image_closure_of_isCompact (isBounded_Ioo _ _).isCompact_closure <|
Continuous.continuousOn <| by continuity).symm
#align closure_open_segment closure_openSegment
end PseudoMetricSpace
section ContinuousConstSMul
variable [LinearOrderedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[TopologicalAddGroup E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E]
/-- If `s` is a convex set, then `a • interior s + b • closure s ⊆ interior s` for all `0 < a`,
`0 ≤ b`, `a + b = 1`. See also `Convex.combo_interior_self_subset_interior` for a weaker version. -/
theorem Convex.combo_interior_closure_subset_interior {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {a b : 𝕜}
(ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) : a • interior s + b • closure s ⊆ interior s :=
interior_smul₀ ha.ne' s ▸
calc
interior (a • s) + b • closure s ⊆ interior (a • s) + closure (b • s) :=
add_subset_add Subset.rfl (smul_closure_subset b s)
_ = interior (a • s) + b • s := by rw [isOpen_interior.add_closure (b • s)]
_ ⊆ interior (a • s + b • s) := subset_interior_add_left
_ ⊆ interior s := interior_mono <| hs.set_combo_subset ha.le hb hab
#align convex.combo_interior_closure_subset_interior Convex.combo_interior_closure_subset_interior
/-- If `s` is a convex set, then `a • interior s + b • s ⊆ interior s` for all `0 < a`, `0 ≤ b`,
`a + b = 1`. See also `Convex.combo_interior_closure_subset_interior` for a stronger version. -/
theorem Convex.combo_interior_self_subset_interior {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {a b : 𝕜}
(ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) : a • interior s + b • s ⊆ interior s :=
calc
a • interior s + b • s ⊆ a • interior s + b • closure s :=
add_subset_add Subset.rfl <| image_subset _ subset_closure
_ ⊆ interior s := hs.combo_interior_closure_subset_interior ha hb hab
#align convex.combo_interior_self_subset_interior Convex.combo_interior_self_subset_interior
/-- If `s` is a convex set, then `a • closure s + b • interior s ⊆ interior s` for all `0 ≤ a`,
`0 < b`, `a + b = 1`. See also `Convex.combo_self_interior_subset_interior` for a weaker version. -/
theorem Convex.combo_closure_interior_subset_interior {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {a b : 𝕜}
(ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) : a • closure s + b • interior s ⊆ interior s := by
rw [add_comm]
exact hs.combo_interior_closure_subset_interior hb ha (add_comm a b ▸ hab)
#align convex.combo_closure_interior_subset_interior Convex.combo_closure_interior_subset_interior
/-- If `s` is a convex set, then `a • s + b • interior s ⊆ interior s` for all `0 ≤ a`, `0 < b`,
`a + b = 1`. See also `Convex.combo_closure_interior_subset_interior` for a stronger version. -/
theorem Convex.combo_self_interior_subset_interior {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {a b : 𝕜}
(ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) : a • s + b • interior s ⊆ interior s := by
rw [add_comm]
exact hs.combo_interior_self_subset_interior hb ha (add_comm a b ▸ hab)
#align convex.combo_self_interior_subset_interior Convex.combo_self_interior_subset_interior
theorem Convex.combo_interior_closure_mem_interior {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {x y : E}
(hx : x ∈ interior s) (hy : y ∈ closure s) {a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b)
(hab : a + b = 1) : a • x + b • y ∈ interior s :=
hs.combo_interior_closure_subset_interior ha hb hab <|
add_mem_add (smul_mem_smul_set hx) (smul_mem_smul_set hy)
#align convex.combo_interior_closure_mem_interior Convex.combo_interior_closure_mem_interior
theorem Convex.combo_interior_self_mem_interior {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {x y : E}
(hx : x ∈ interior s) (hy : y ∈ s) {a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
a • x + b • y ∈ interior s :=
hs.combo_interior_closure_mem_interior hx (subset_closure hy) ha hb hab
#align convex.combo_interior_self_mem_interior Convex.combo_interior_self_mem_interior
theorem Convex.combo_closure_interior_mem_interior {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {x y : E}
(hx : x ∈ closure s) (hy : y ∈ interior s) {a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b)
(hab : a + b = 1) : a • x + b • y ∈ interior s :=
hs.combo_closure_interior_subset_interior ha hb hab <|
add_mem_add (smul_mem_smul_set hx) (smul_mem_smul_set hy)
#align convex.combo_closure_interior_mem_interior Convex.combo_closure_interior_mem_interior
theorem Convex.combo_self_interior_mem_interior {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ interior s) {a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
a • x + b • y ∈ interior s :=
hs.combo_closure_interior_mem_interior (subset_closure hx) hy ha hb hab
#align convex.combo_self_interior_mem_interior Convex.combo_self_interior_mem_interior
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Topology.lean | 189 | 192 | theorem Convex.openSegment_interior_closure_subset_interior {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {x y : E}
(hx : x ∈ interior s) (hy : y ∈ closure s) : openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ interior s := by |
rintro _ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
exact hs.combo_interior_closure_mem_interior hx hy ha hb.le hab
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.graded_algebra.homogeneous_ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4e861f25ba5ceef42ba0712d8ffeb32f38ad6441"
/-!
# Homogeneous ideals of a graded algebra
This file defines homogeneous ideals of `GradedRing 𝒜` where `𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A` and
operations on them.
## Main definitions
For any `I : Ideal A`:
* `Ideal.IsHomogeneous 𝒜 I`: The property that an ideal is closed under `GradedRing.proj`.
* `HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜`: The structure extending ideals which satisfy `Ideal.IsHomogeneous`.
* `Ideal.homogeneousCore I 𝒜`: The largest homogeneous ideal smaller than `I`.
* `Ideal.homogeneousHull I 𝒜`: The smallest homogeneous ideal larger than `I`.
## Main statements
* `HomogeneousIdeal.completeLattice`: `Ideal.IsHomogeneous` is preserved by `⊥`, `⊤`, `⊔`, `⊓`,
`⨆`, `⨅`, and so the subtype of homogeneous ideals inherits a complete lattice structure.
* `Ideal.homogeneousCore.gi`: `Ideal.homogeneousCore` forms a galois insertion with coercion.
* `Ideal.homogeneousHull.gi`: `Ideal.homogeneousHull` forms a galois insertion with coercion.
## Implementation notes
We introduce `Ideal.homogeneousCore'` earlier than might be expected so that we can get access
to `Ideal.IsHomogeneous.iff_exists` as quickly as possible.
## Tags
graded algebra, homogeneous
-/
open SetLike DirectSum Set
open Pointwise DirectSum
variable {ι σ R A : Type*}
section HomogeneousDef
variable [Semiring A]
variable [SetLike σ A] [AddSubmonoidClass σ A] (𝒜 : ι → σ)
variable [DecidableEq ι] [AddMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜]
variable (I : Ideal A)
/-- An `I : Ideal A` is homogeneous if for every `r ∈ I`, all homogeneous components
of `r` are in `I`. -/
def Ideal.IsHomogeneous : Prop :=
∀ (i : ι) ⦃r : A⦄, r ∈ I → (DirectSum.decompose 𝒜 r i : A) ∈ I
#align ideal.is_homogeneous Ideal.IsHomogeneous
theorem Ideal.IsHomogeneous.mem_iff {I} (hI : Ideal.IsHomogeneous 𝒜 I) {x} :
x ∈ I ↔ ∀ i, (decompose 𝒜 x i : A) ∈ I := by
classical
refine ⟨fun hx i ↦ hI i hx, fun hx ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← DirectSum.sum_support_decompose 𝒜 x]
exact Ideal.sum_mem _ (fun i _ ↦ hx i)
/-- For any `Semiring A`, we collect the homogeneous ideals of `A` into a type. -/
structure HomogeneousIdeal extends Submodule A A where
is_homogeneous' : Ideal.IsHomogeneous 𝒜 toSubmodule
#align homogeneous_ideal HomogeneousIdeal
variable {𝒜}
/-- Converting a homogeneous ideal to an ideal. -/
def HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal (I : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜) : Ideal A :=
I.toSubmodule
#align homogeneous_ideal.to_ideal HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal
theorem HomogeneousIdeal.isHomogeneous (I : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜) : I.toIdeal.IsHomogeneous 𝒜 :=
I.is_homogeneous'
#align homogeneous_ideal.is_homogeneous HomogeneousIdeal.isHomogeneous
theorem HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal_injective :
Function.Injective (HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜 → Ideal A) :=
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ => fun (h : x = y) => by simp [h]
#align homogeneous_ideal.to_ideal_injective HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal_injective
instance HomogeneousIdeal.setLike : SetLike (HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜) A where
coe I := I.toIdeal
coe_injective' _ _ h := HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal_injective <| SetLike.coe_injective h
#align homogeneous_ideal.set_like HomogeneousIdeal.setLike
@[ext]
theorem HomogeneousIdeal.ext {I J : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜} (h : I.toIdeal = J.toIdeal) : I = J :=
HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal_injective h
#align homogeneous_ideal.ext HomogeneousIdeal.ext
theorem HomogeneousIdeal.ext' {I J : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜} (h : ∀ i, ∀ x ∈ 𝒜 i, x ∈ I ↔ x ∈ J) :
I = J := by
ext
rw [I.isHomogeneous.mem_iff, J.isHomogeneous.mem_iff]
apply forall_congr'
exact fun i ↦ h i _ (decompose 𝒜 _ i).2
@[simp]
theorem HomogeneousIdeal.mem_iff {I : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜} {x : A} : x ∈ I.toIdeal ↔ x ∈ I :=
Iff.rfl
#align homogeneous_ideal.mem_iff HomogeneousIdeal.mem_iff
end HomogeneousDef
section HomogeneousCore
variable [Semiring A]
variable [SetLike σ A] (𝒜 : ι → σ)
variable (I : Ideal A)
/-- For any `I : Ideal A`, not necessarily homogeneous, `I.homogeneousCore' 𝒜`
is the largest homogeneous ideal of `A` contained in `I`, as an ideal. -/
def Ideal.homogeneousCore' (I : Ideal A) : Ideal A :=
Ideal.span ((↑) '' (((↑) : Subtype (Homogeneous 𝒜) → A) ⁻¹' I))
#align ideal.homogeneous_core' Ideal.homogeneousCore'
theorem Ideal.homogeneousCore'_mono : Monotone (Ideal.homogeneousCore' 𝒜) :=
fun _ _ I_le_J => Ideal.span_mono <| Set.image_subset _ fun _ => @I_le_J _
#align ideal.homogeneous_core'_mono Ideal.homogeneousCore'_mono
theorem Ideal.homogeneousCore'_le : I.homogeneousCore' 𝒜 ≤ I :=
Ideal.span_le.2 <| image_preimage_subset _ _
#align ideal.homogeneous_core'_le Ideal.homogeneousCore'_le
end HomogeneousCore
section IsHomogeneousIdealDefs
variable [Semiring A]
variable [SetLike σ A] [AddSubmonoidClass σ A] (𝒜 : ι → σ)
variable [DecidableEq ι] [AddMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜]
variable (I : Ideal A)
theorem Ideal.isHomogeneous_iff_forall_subset :
I.IsHomogeneous 𝒜 ↔ ∀ i, (I : Set A) ⊆ GradedRing.proj 𝒜 i ⁻¹' I :=
Iff.rfl
#align ideal.is_homogeneous_iff_forall_subset Ideal.isHomogeneous_iff_forall_subset
theorem Ideal.isHomogeneous_iff_subset_iInter :
I.IsHomogeneous 𝒜 ↔ (I : Set A) ⊆ ⋂ i, GradedRing.proj 𝒜 i ⁻¹' ↑I :=
subset_iInter_iff.symm
#align ideal.is_homogeneous_iff_subset_Inter Ideal.isHomogeneous_iff_subset_iInter
theorem Ideal.mul_homogeneous_element_mem_of_mem {I : Ideal A} (r x : A) (hx₁ : Homogeneous 𝒜 x)
(hx₂ : x ∈ I) (j : ι) : GradedRing.proj 𝒜 j (r * x) ∈ I := by
classical
rw [← DirectSum.sum_support_decompose 𝒜 r, Finset.sum_mul, map_sum]
apply Ideal.sum_mem
intro k _
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := hx₁
have mem₁ : (DirectSum.decompose 𝒜 r k : A) * x ∈ 𝒜 (k + i) :=
GradedMul.mul_mem (SetLike.coe_mem _) hi
erw [GradedRing.proj_apply, DirectSum.decompose_of_mem 𝒜 mem₁, coe_of_apply]
split_ifs
· exact I.mul_mem_left _ hx₂
· exact I.zero_mem
#align ideal.mul_homogeneous_element_mem_of_mem Ideal.mul_homogeneous_element_mem_of_mem
| Mathlib/RingTheory/GradedAlgebra/HomogeneousIdeal.lean | 170 | 184 | theorem Ideal.homogeneous_span (s : Set A) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, Homogeneous 𝒜 x) :
(Ideal.span s).IsHomogeneous 𝒜 := by |
rintro i r hr
rw [Ideal.span, Finsupp.span_eq_range_total] at hr
rw [LinearMap.mem_range] at hr
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := hr
rw [Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.sum, decompose_sum, DFinsupp.finset_sum_apply,
AddSubmonoidClass.coe_finset_sum]
refine Ideal.sum_mem _ ?_
rintro z hz1
rw [smul_eq_mul]
refine Ideal.mul_homogeneous_element_mem_of_mem 𝒜 (s z) z ?_ ?_ i
· rcases z with ⟨z, hz2⟩
apply h _ hz2
· exact Ideal.subset_span z.2
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nicolò Cavalleri, Sébastien Gouëzel, Heather Macbeth, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.Basic
#align_import topology.fiber_bundle.constructions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e473c3198bb41f68560cab68a0529c854b618833"
/-!
# Standard constructions on fiber bundles
This file contains several standard constructions on fiber bundles:
* `Bundle.Trivial.fiberBundle 𝕜 B F`: the trivial fiber bundle with model fiber `F` over the base
`B`
* `FiberBundle.prod`: for fiber bundles `E₁` and `E₂` over a common base, a fiber bundle structure
on their fiberwise product `E₁ ×ᵇ E₂` (the notation stands for `fun x ↦ E₁ x × E₂ x`).
* `FiberBundle.pullback`: for a fiber bundle `E` over `B`, a fiber bundle structure on its
pullback `f *ᵖ E` by a map `f : B' → B` (the notation is a type synonym for `E ∘ f`).
## Tags
fiber bundle, fibre bundle, fiberwise product, pullback
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter Set Bundle
open scoped Classical
open Topology Bundle
/-! ### The trivial bundle -/
namespace Bundle
namespace Trivial
variable (B : Type*) (F : Type*)
-- Porting note (#10754): Added name for this instance.
-- TODO: use `TotalSpace.toProd`
instance topologicalSpace [t₁ : TopologicalSpace B]
[t₂ : TopologicalSpace F] : TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F (Trivial B F)) :=
induced TotalSpace.proj t₁ ⊓ induced (TotalSpace.trivialSnd B F) t₂
#align bundle.trivial.bundle.total_space.topological_space Bundle.Trivial.topologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace B] [TopologicalSpace F]
theorem inducing_toProd : Inducing (TotalSpace.toProd B F) :=
⟨by simp only [instTopologicalSpaceProd, induced_inf, induced_compose]; rfl⟩
/-- Homeomorphism between the total space of the trivial bundle and the Cartesian product. -/
def homeomorphProd : TotalSpace F (Trivial B F) ≃ₜ B × F :=
(TotalSpace.toProd _ _).toHomeomorphOfInducing (inducing_toProd B F)
/-- Local trivialization for trivial bundle. -/
def trivialization : Trivialization F (π F (Bundle.Trivial B F)) where
-- Porting note: golfed
toPartialHomeomorph := (homeomorphProd B F).toPartialHomeomorph
baseSet := univ
open_baseSet := isOpen_univ
source_eq := rfl
target_eq := univ_prod_univ.symm
proj_toFun _ _ := rfl
#align bundle.trivial.trivialization Bundle.Trivial.trivialization
@[simp]
theorem trivialization_source : (trivialization B F).source = univ := rfl
#align bundle.trivial.trivialization_source Bundle.Trivial.trivialization_source
@[simp]
theorem trivialization_target : (trivialization B F).target = univ := rfl
#align bundle.trivial.trivialization_target Bundle.Trivial.trivialization_target
/-- Fiber bundle instance on the trivial bundle. -/
instance fiberBundle : FiberBundle F (Bundle.Trivial B F) where
trivializationAtlas' := {trivialization B F}
trivializationAt' _ := trivialization B F
mem_baseSet_trivializationAt' := mem_univ
trivialization_mem_atlas' _ := mem_singleton _
totalSpaceMk_inducing' _ := (homeomorphProd B F).symm.inducing.comp
(inducing_const_prod.2 inducing_id)
#align bundle.trivial.fiber_bundle Bundle.Trivial.fiberBundle
theorem eq_trivialization (e : Trivialization F (π F (Bundle.Trivial B F)))
[i : MemTrivializationAtlas e] : e = trivialization B F := i.out
#align bundle.trivial.eq_trivialization Bundle.Trivial.eq_trivialization
end Trivial
end Bundle
/-! ### Fibrewise product of two bundles -/
section Prod
variable {B : Type*}
section Defs
variable (F₁ : Type*) (E₁ : B → Type*) (F₂ : Type*) (E₂ : B → Type*)
variable [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F₁ E₁)] [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F₂ E₂)]
/-- Equip the total space of the fiberwise product of two fiber bundles `E₁`, `E₂` with
the induced topology from the diagonal embedding into `TotalSpace F₁ E₁ × TotalSpace F₂ E₂`. -/
instance FiberBundle.Prod.topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace (F₁ × F₂) (E₁ ×ᵇ E₂)) :=
TopologicalSpace.induced
(fun p ↦ ((⟨p.1, p.2.1⟩ : TotalSpace F₁ E₁), (⟨p.1, p.2.2⟩ : TotalSpace F₂ E₂)))
inferInstance
#align fiber_bundle.prod.topological_space FiberBundle.Prod.topologicalSpace
/-- The diagonal map from the total space of the fiberwise product of two fiber bundles
`E₁`, `E₂` into `TotalSpace F₁ E₁ × TotalSpace F₂ E₂` is `Inducing`. -/
theorem FiberBundle.Prod.inducing_diag :
Inducing (fun p ↦ (⟨p.1, p.2.1⟩, ⟨p.1, p.2.2⟩) :
TotalSpace (F₁ × F₂) (E₁ ×ᵇ E₂) → TotalSpace F₁ E₁ × TotalSpace F₂ E₂) :=
⟨rfl⟩
#align fiber_bundle.prod.inducing_diag FiberBundle.Prod.inducing_diag
end Defs
open FiberBundle
variable [TopologicalSpace B] (F₁ : Type*) [TopologicalSpace F₁] (E₁ : B → Type*)
[TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F₁ E₁)] (F₂ : Type*) [TopologicalSpace F₂] (E₂ : B → Type*)
[TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F₂ E₂)]
namespace Trivialization
variable {F₁ E₁ F₂ E₂}
variable (e₁ : Trivialization F₁ (π F₁ E₁)) (e₂ : Trivialization F₂ (π F₂ E₂))
/-- Given trivializations `e₁`, `e₂` for fiber bundles `E₁`, `E₂` over a base `B`, the forward
function for the construction `Trivialization.prod`, the induced
trivialization for the fiberwise product of `E₁` and `E₂`. -/
def Prod.toFun' : TotalSpace (F₁ × F₂) (E₁ ×ᵇ E₂) → B × F₁ × F₂ :=
fun p ↦ ⟨p.1, (e₁ ⟨p.1, p.2.1⟩).2, (e₂ ⟨p.1, p.2.2⟩).2⟩
#align trivialization.prod.to_fun' Trivialization.Prod.toFun'
variable {e₁ e₂}
theorem Prod.continuous_to_fun : ContinuousOn (Prod.toFun' e₁ e₂)
(π (F₁ × F₂) (E₁ ×ᵇ E₂) ⁻¹' (e₁.baseSet ∩ e₂.baseSet)) := by
let f₁ : TotalSpace (F₁ × F₂) (E₁ ×ᵇ E₂) → TotalSpace F₁ E₁ × TotalSpace F₂ E₂ :=
fun p ↦ ((⟨p.1, p.2.1⟩ : TotalSpace F₁ E₁), (⟨p.1, p.2.2⟩ : TotalSpace F₂ E₂))
let f₂ : TotalSpace F₁ E₁ × TotalSpace F₂ E₂ → (B × F₁) × B × F₂ := fun p ↦ ⟨e₁ p.1, e₂ p.2⟩
let f₃ : (B × F₁) × B × F₂ → B × F₁ × F₂ := fun p ↦ ⟨p.1.1, p.1.2, p.2.2⟩
have hf₁ : Continuous f₁ := (Prod.inducing_diag F₁ E₁ F₂ E₂).continuous
have hf₂ : ContinuousOn f₂ (e₁.source ×ˢ e₂.source) :=
e₁.toPartialHomeomorph.continuousOn.prod_map e₂.toPartialHomeomorph.continuousOn
have hf₃ : Continuous f₃ :=
(continuous_fst.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk (continuous_snd.prod_map continuous_snd)
refine ((hf₃.comp_continuousOn hf₂).comp hf₁.continuousOn ?_).congr ?_
· rw [e₁.source_eq, e₂.source_eq]
exact mapsTo_preimage _ _
rintro ⟨b, v₁, v₂⟩ ⟨hb₁, _⟩
simp only [f₃, Prod.toFun', Prod.mk.inj_iff, Function.comp_apply, and_true_iff]
rw [e₁.coe_fst]
rw [e₁.source_eq, mem_preimage]
exact hb₁
#align trivialization.prod.continuous_to_fun Trivialization.Prod.continuous_to_fun
variable (e₁ e₂) [∀ x, Zero (E₁ x)] [∀ x, Zero (E₂ x)]
/-- Given trivializations `e₁`, `e₂` for fiber bundles `E₁`, `E₂` over a base `B`, the inverse
function for the construction `Trivialization.prod`, the induced
trivialization for the fiberwise product of `E₁` and `E₂`. -/
noncomputable def Prod.invFun' (p : B × F₁ × F₂) : TotalSpace (F₁ × F₂) (E₁ ×ᵇ E₂) :=
⟨p.1, e₁.symm p.1 p.2.1, e₂.symm p.1 p.2.2⟩
#align trivialization.prod.inv_fun' Trivialization.Prod.invFun'
variable {e₁ e₂}
theorem Prod.left_inv {x : TotalSpace (F₁ × F₂) (E₁ ×ᵇ E₂)}
(h : x ∈ π (F₁ × F₂) (E₁ ×ᵇ E₂) ⁻¹' (e₁.baseSet ∩ e₂.baseSet)) :
Prod.invFun' e₁ e₂ (Prod.toFun' e₁ e₂ x) = x := by
obtain ⟨x, v₁, v₂⟩ := x
obtain ⟨h₁ : x ∈ e₁.baseSet, h₂ : x ∈ e₂.baseSet⟩ := h
simp only [Prod.toFun', Prod.invFun', symm_apply_apply_mk, h₁, h₂]
#align trivialization.prod.left_inv Trivialization.Prod.left_inv
| Mathlib/Topology/FiberBundle/Constructions.lean | 188 | 193 | theorem Prod.right_inv {x : B × F₁ × F₂}
(h : x ∈ (e₁.baseSet ∩ e₂.baseSet) ×ˢ (univ : Set (F₁ × F₂))) :
Prod.toFun' e₁ e₂ (Prod.invFun' e₁ e₂ x) = x := by |
obtain ⟨x, w₁, w₂⟩ := x
obtain ⟨⟨h₁ : x ∈ e₁.baseSet, h₂ : x ∈ e₂.baseSet⟩, -⟩ := h
simp only [Prod.toFun', Prod.invFun', apply_mk_symm, h₁, h₂]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Order
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Ring
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Real
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Isometry
#align_import topology.instances.nnreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32253a1a1071173b33dc7d6a218cf722c6feb514"
/-!
# Topology on `ℝ≥0`
The natural topology on `ℝ≥0` (the one induced from `ℝ`), and a basic API.
## Main definitions
Instances for the following typeclasses are defined:
* `TopologicalSpace ℝ≥0`
* `TopologicalSemiring ℝ≥0`
* `SecondCountableTopology ℝ≥0`
* `OrderTopology ℝ≥0`
* `ProperSpace ℝ≥0`
* `ContinuousSub ℝ≥0`
* `HasContinuousInv₀ ℝ≥0` (continuity of `x⁻¹` away from `0`)
* `ContinuousSMul ℝ≥0 α` (whenever `α` has a continuous `MulAction ℝ α`)
Everything is inherited from the corresponding structures on the reals.
## Main statements
Various mathematically trivial lemmas are proved about the compatibility
of limits and sums in `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ`. For example
* `tendsto_coe {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} {x : ℝ≥0} :
Filter.Tendsto (fun a, (m a : ℝ)) f (𝓝 (x : ℝ)) ↔ Filter.Tendsto m f (𝓝 x)`
says that the limit of a filter along a map to `ℝ≥0` is the same in `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0`, and
* `coe_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0} : ((∑'a, f a) : ℝ) = (∑'a, (f a : ℝ))`
says that says that a sum of elements in `ℝ≥0` is the same in `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0`.
Similarly, some mathematically trivial lemmas about infinite sums are proved,
a few of which rely on the fact that subtraction is continuous.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set TopologicalSpace Metric Filter
open Topology
namespace NNReal
open NNReal Filter
instance : TopologicalSpace ℝ≥0 := inferInstance
-- short-circuit type class inference
instance : TopologicalSemiring ℝ≥0 where
toContinuousAdd := continuousAdd_induced toRealHom
toContinuousMul := continuousMul_induced toRealHom
instance : SecondCountableTopology ℝ≥0 :=
inferInstanceAs (SecondCountableTopology { x : ℝ | 0 ≤ x })
instance : OrderTopology ℝ≥0 :=
orderTopology_of_ordConnected (t := Ici 0)
instance : CompleteSpace ℝ≥0 :=
isClosed_Ici.completeSpace_coe
instance : ContinuousStar ℝ≥0 where
continuous_star := continuous_id
section coe
variable {α : Type*}
open Filter Finset
theorem _root_.continuous_real_toNNReal : Continuous Real.toNNReal :=
(continuous_id.max continuous_const).subtype_mk _
#align continuous_real_to_nnreal continuous_real_toNNReal
/-- `Real.toNNReal` bundled as a continuous map for convenience. -/
@[simps (config := .asFn)]
noncomputable def _root_.ContinuousMap.realToNNReal : C(ℝ, ℝ≥0) :=
.mk Real.toNNReal continuous_real_toNNReal
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) :=
continuous_subtype_val
#align nnreal.continuous_coe NNReal.continuous_coe
/-- Embedding of `ℝ≥0` to `ℝ` as a bundled continuous map. -/
@[simps (config := .asFn)]
def _root_.ContinuousMap.coeNNRealReal : C(ℝ≥0, ℝ) :=
⟨(↑), continuous_coe⟩
#align continuous_map.coe_nnreal_real ContinuousMap.coeNNRealReal
#align continuous_map.coe_nnreal_real_apply ContinuousMap.coeNNRealReal_apply
instance ContinuousMap.canLift {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] :
CanLift C(X, ℝ) C(X, ℝ≥0) ContinuousMap.coeNNRealReal.comp fun f => ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x where
prf f hf := ⟨⟨fun x => ⟨f x, hf x⟩, f.2.subtype_mk _⟩, DFunLike.ext' rfl⟩
#align nnreal.continuous_map.can_lift NNReal.ContinuousMap.canLift
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} {x : ℝ≥0} :
Tendsto (fun a => (m a : ℝ)) f (𝓝 (x : ℝ)) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 x) :=
tendsto_subtype_rng.symm
#align nnreal.tendsto_coe NNReal.tendsto_coe
theorem tendsto_coe' {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {m : α → ℝ≥0} {x : ℝ} :
Tendsto (fun a => m a : α → ℝ) f (𝓝 x) ↔ ∃ hx : 0 ≤ x, Tendsto m f (𝓝 ⟨x, hx⟩) :=
⟨fun h => ⟨ge_of_tendsto' h fun c => (m c).2, tendsto_coe.1 h⟩, fun ⟨_, hm⟩ => tendsto_coe.2 hm⟩
#align nnreal.tendsto_coe' NNReal.tendsto_coe'
@[simp] theorem map_coe_atTop : map toReal atTop = atTop := map_val_Ici_atTop 0
#align nnreal.map_coe_at_top NNReal.map_coe_atTop
theorem comap_coe_atTop : comap toReal atTop = atTop := (atTop_Ici_eq 0).symm
#align nnreal.comap_coe_at_top NNReal.comap_coe_atTop
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe_atTop {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} :
Tendsto (fun a => (m a : ℝ)) f atTop ↔ Tendsto m f atTop :=
tendsto_Ici_atTop.symm
#align nnreal.tendsto_coe_at_top NNReal.tendsto_coe_atTop
theorem _root_.tendsto_real_toNNReal {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ} {x : ℝ} (h : Tendsto m f (𝓝 x)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Real.toNNReal (m a)) f (𝓝 (Real.toNNReal x)) :=
(continuous_real_toNNReal.tendsto _).comp h
#align tendsto_real_to_nnreal tendsto_real_toNNReal
theorem _root_.tendsto_real_toNNReal_atTop : Tendsto Real.toNNReal atTop atTop := by
rw [← tendsto_coe_atTop]
exact tendsto_atTop_mono Real.le_coe_toNNReal tendsto_id
#align tendsto_real_to_nnreal_at_top tendsto_real_toNNReal_atTop
theorem nhds_zero : 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0) = ⨅ (a : ℝ≥0) (_ : a ≠ 0), 𝓟 (Iio a) :=
nhds_bot_order.trans <| by simp only [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]; rfl
#align nnreal.nhds_zero NNReal.nhds_zero
theorem nhds_zero_basis : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0 => 0 < a) fun a => Iio a :=
nhds_bot_basis
#align nnreal.nhds_zero_basis NNReal.nhds_zero_basis
instance : ContinuousSub ℝ≥0 :=
⟨((continuous_coe.fst'.sub continuous_coe.snd').max continuous_const).subtype_mk _⟩
instance : HasContinuousInv₀ ℝ≥0 := inferInstance
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [MulAction ℝ α] [ContinuousSMul ℝ α] :
ContinuousSMul ℝ≥0 α where
continuous_smul := continuous_induced_dom.fst'.smul continuous_snd
@[norm_cast]
theorem hasSum_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} : HasSum (fun a => (f a : ℝ)) (r : ℝ) ↔ HasSum f r := by
simp only [HasSum, ← coe_sum, tendsto_coe]
#align nnreal.has_sum_coe NNReal.hasSum_coe
protected theorem _root_.HasSum.toNNReal {f : α → ℝ} {y : ℝ} (hf₀ : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n)
(hy : HasSum f y) : HasSum (fun x => Real.toNNReal (f x)) y.toNNReal := by
lift y to ℝ≥0 using hy.nonneg hf₀
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using hf₀
simpa [hasSum_coe] using hy
theorem hasSum_real_toNNReal_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf_nonneg : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) (hf : Summable f) :
HasSum (fun n => Real.toNNReal (f n)) (Real.toNNReal (∑' n, f n)) :=
hf.hasSum.toNNReal hf_nonneg
#align nnreal.has_sum_real_to_nnreal_of_nonneg NNReal.hasSum_real_toNNReal_of_nonneg
@[norm_cast]
theorem summable_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} : (Summable fun a => (f a : ℝ)) ↔ Summable f := by
constructor
· exact fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha.nonneg fun x => (f x).2⟩, hasSum_coe.1 ha⟩
· exact fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨a.1, hasSum_coe.2 ha⟩
#align nnreal.summable_coe NNReal.summable_coe
theorem summable_mk {f : α → ℝ} (hf : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) :
(@Summable ℝ≥0 _ _ _ fun n => ⟨f n, hf n⟩) ↔ Summable f :=
Iff.symm <| summable_coe (f := fun x => ⟨f x, hf x⟩)
#align nnreal.summable_coe_of_nonneg NNReal.summable_mk
open scoped Classical
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0} : ↑(∑' a, f a) = ∑' a, (f a : ℝ) :=
if hf : Summable f then Eq.symm <| (hasSum_coe.2 <| hf.hasSum).tsum_eq
else by simp [tsum_def, hf, mt summable_coe.1 hf]
#align nnreal.coe_tsum NNReal.coe_tsum
theorem coe_tsum_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf₁ : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) :
(⟨∑' n, f n, tsum_nonneg hf₁⟩ : ℝ≥0) = (∑' n, ⟨f n, hf₁ n⟩ : ℝ≥0) :=
NNReal.eq <| Eq.symm <| coe_tsum (f := fun x => ⟨f x, hf₁ x⟩)
#align nnreal.coe_tsum_of_nonneg NNReal.coe_tsum_of_nonneg
nonrec theorem tsum_mul_left (a : ℝ≥0) (f : α → ℝ≥0) : ∑' x, a * f x = a * ∑' x, f x :=
NNReal.eq <| by simp only [coe_tsum, NNReal.coe_mul, tsum_mul_left]
#align nnreal.tsum_mul_left NNReal.tsum_mul_left
nonrec theorem tsum_mul_right (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : ∑' x, f x * a = (∑' x, f x) * a :=
NNReal.eq <| by simp only [coe_tsum, NNReal.coe_mul, tsum_mul_right]
#align nnreal.tsum_mul_right NNReal.tsum_mul_right
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/NNReal.lean | 211 | 214 | theorem summable_comp_injective {β : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) {i : β → α}
(hi : Function.Injective i) : Summable (f ∘ i) := by |
rw [← summable_coe] at hf ⊢
exact hf.comp_injective hi
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Isomorphisms
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Projection
import Mathlib.Order.JordanHolder
import Mathlib.Order.CompactlyGenerated.Intervals
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
#align_import ring_theory.simple_module from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cce7f68a7eaadadf74c82bbac20721cdc03a1cc1"
/-!
# Simple Modules
## Main Definitions
* `IsSimpleModule` indicates that a module has no proper submodules
(the only submodules are `⊥` and `⊤`).
* `IsSemisimpleModule` indicates that every submodule has a complement, or equivalently,
the module is a direct sum of simple modules.
* A `DivisionRing` structure on the endomorphism ring of a simple module.
## Main Results
* Schur's Lemma: `bijective_or_eq_zero` shows that a linear map between simple modules
is either bijective or 0, leading to a `DivisionRing` structure on the endomorphism ring.
* `isSimpleModule_iff_quot_maximal`:
a module is simple iff it's isomorphic to the quotient of the ring by a maximal left ideal.
* `sSup_simples_eq_top_iff_isSemisimpleModule`:
a module is semisimple iff it is generated by its simple submodules.
* `IsSemisimpleModule.annihilator_isRadical`:
the annihilator of a semisimple module over a commutative ring is a radical ideal.
* `IsSemisimpleModule.submodule`, `IsSemisimpleModule.quotient`:
any submodule or quotient module of a semisimple module is semisimple.
* `isSemisimpleModule_of_isSemisimpleModule_submodule`:
a module generated by semisimple submodules is itself semisimple.
* `IsSemisimpleRing.isSemisimpleModule`: every module over a semisimple ring is semisimple.
* `instIsSemisimpleRingForAllRing`: a finite product of semisimple rings is semisimple.
* `RingHom.isSemisimpleRing_of_surjective`: any quotient of a semisimple ring is semisimple.
## TODO
* Artin-Wedderburn Theory
* Unify with the work on Schur's Lemma in a category theory context
-/
variable {ι : Type*} (R S : Type*) [Ring R] [Ring S] (M : Type*) [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
/-- A module is simple when it has only two submodules, `⊥` and `⊤`. -/
abbrev IsSimpleModule :=
IsSimpleOrder (Submodule R M)
#align is_simple_module IsSimpleModule
/-- A module is semisimple when every submodule has a complement, or equivalently, the module
is a direct sum of simple modules. -/
abbrev IsSemisimpleModule :=
ComplementedLattice (Submodule R M)
#align is_semisimple_module IsSemisimpleModule
/-- A ring is semisimple if it is semisimple as a module over itself. -/
abbrev IsSemisimpleRing := IsSemisimpleModule R R
theorem RingEquiv.isSemisimpleRing (e : R ≃+* S) [IsSemisimpleRing R] : IsSemisimpleRing S :=
(Submodule.orderIsoMapComap e.toSemilinearEquiv).complementedLattice
-- Making this an instance causes the linter to complain of "dangerous instances"
theorem IsSimpleModule.nontrivial [IsSimpleModule R M] : Nontrivial M :=
⟨⟨0, by
have h : (⊥ : Submodule R M) ≠ ⊤ := bot_ne_top
contrapose! h
ext x
simp [Submodule.mem_bot, Submodule.mem_top, h x]⟩⟩
#align is_simple_module.nontrivial IsSimpleModule.nontrivial
variable {m : Submodule R M} {N : Type*} [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] {R S M}
theorem LinearMap.isSimpleModule_iff_of_bijective [Module S N] {σ : R →+* S} [RingHomSurjective σ]
(l : M →ₛₗ[σ] N) (hl : Function.Bijective l) : IsSimpleModule R M ↔ IsSimpleModule S N :=
(Submodule.orderIsoMapComapOfBijective l hl).isSimpleOrder_iff
theorem IsSimpleModule.congr (l : M ≃ₗ[R] N) [IsSimpleModule R N] : IsSimpleModule R M :=
(Submodule.orderIsoMapComap l).isSimpleOrder
#align is_simple_module.congr IsSimpleModule.congr
theorem isSimpleModule_iff_isAtom : IsSimpleModule R m ↔ IsAtom m := by
rw [← Set.isSimpleOrder_Iic_iff_isAtom]
exact m.mapIic.isSimpleOrder_iff
#align is_simple_module_iff_is_atom isSimpleModule_iff_isAtom
theorem isSimpleModule_iff_isCoatom : IsSimpleModule R (M ⧸ m) ↔ IsCoatom m := by
rw [← Set.isSimpleOrder_Ici_iff_isCoatom]
apply OrderIso.isSimpleOrder_iff
exact Submodule.comapMkQRelIso m
#align is_simple_module_iff_is_coatom isSimpleModule_iff_isCoatom
theorem covBy_iff_quot_is_simple {A B : Submodule R M} (hAB : A ≤ B) :
A ⋖ B ↔ IsSimpleModule R (B ⧸ Submodule.comap B.subtype A) := by
set f : Submodule R B ≃o Set.Iic B := B.mapIic with hf
rw [covBy_iff_coatom_Iic hAB, isSimpleModule_iff_isCoatom, ← OrderIso.isCoatom_iff f, hf]
simp [-OrderIso.isCoatom_iff, Submodule.map_comap_subtype, inf_eq_right.2 hAB]
#align covby_iff_quot_is_simple covBy_iff_quot_is_simple
namespace IsSimpleModule
@[simp]
theorem isAtom [IsSimpleModule R m] : IsAtom m :=
isSimpleModule_iff_isAtom.1 ‹_›
#align is_simple_module.is_atom IsSimpleModule.isAtom
variable [IsSimpleModule R M] (R)
open LinearMap
theorem span_singleton_eq_top {m : M} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Submodule.span R {m} = ⊤ :=
(eq_bot_or_eq_top _).resolve_left fun h ↦ hm (h.le <| Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self m)
instance (S : Submodule R M) : S.IsPrincipal where
principal' := by
obtain rfl | rfl := eq_bot_or_eq_top S
· exact ⟨0, Submodule.span_zero.symm⟩
have := IsSimpleModule.nontrivial R M
have ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_ne (0 : M)
exact ⟨m, (span_singleton_eq_top R hm).symm⟩
theorem toSpanSingleton_surjective {m : M} (hm : m ≠ 0) :
Function.Surjective (toSpanSingleton R M m) := by
rw [← range_eq_top, ← span_singleton_eq_range, span_singleton_eq_top R hm]
theorem ker_toSpanSingleton_isMaximal {m : M} (hm : m ≠ 0) :
Ideal.IsMaximal (ker (toSpanSingleton R M m)) := by
rw [Ideal.isMaximal_def, ← isSimpleModule_iff_isCoatom]
exact congr (quotKerEquivOfSurjective _ <| toSpanSingleton_surjective R hm)
end IsSimpleModule
open IsSimpleModule in
/-- A module is simple iff it's isomorphic to the quotient of the ring by a maximal left ideal
(not necessarily unique if the ring is not commutative). -/
theorem isSimpleModule_iff_quot_maximal :
IsSimpleModule R M ↔ ∃ I : Ideal R, I.IsMaximal ∧ Nonempty (M ≃ₗ[R] R ⧸ I) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨I, ⟨coatom⟩, ⟨equiv⟩⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· have := IsSimpleModule.nontrivial R M
have ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_ne (0 : M)
exact ⟨_, ker_toSpanSingleton_isMaximal R hm,
⟨(LinearMap.quotKerEquivOfSurjective _ <| toSpanSingleton_surjective R hm).symm⟩⟩
· convert congr equiv; rwa [isSimpleModule_iff_isCoatom]
/-- In general, the annihilator of a simple module is called a primitive ideal, and it is
always a two-sided prime ideal, but mathlib's `Ideal.IsPrime` is not the correct definition
for noncommutative rings. -/
theorem IsSimpleModule.annihilator_isMaximal {R} [CommRing R] [Module R M]
[simple : IsSimpleModule R M] : (Module.annihilator R M).IsMaximal := by
have ⟨I, max, ⟨e⟩⟩ := isSimpleModule_iff_quot_maximal.mp simple
rwa [e.annihilator_eq, I.annihilator_quotient]
theorem isSimpleModule_iff_toSpanSingleton_surjective : IsSimpleModule R M ↔
Nontrivial M ∧ ∀ x : M, x ≠ 0 → Function.Surjective (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.nontrivial, fun _ ↦ h.toSpanSingleton_surjective⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦
⟨fun m ↦ or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun ne_bot ↦
have ⟨x, hxm, hx0⟩ := m.ne_bot_iff.mp ne_bot
top_unique <| fun z _ ↦ by obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := h x hx0 z; exact m.smul_mem _ hxm⟩⟩
/-- A ring is a simple module over itself iff it is a division ring. -/
theorem isSimpleModule_self_iff_isUnit :
IsSimpleModule R R ↔ Nontrivial R ∧ ∀ x : R, x ≠ 0 → IsUnit x :=
isSimpleModule_iff_toSpanSingleton_surjective.trans <| and_congr_right fun _ ↦ by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ ?_, fun h x hx ↦ (h x hx).unit.mulRight_bijective.surjective⟩
obtain ⟨y, hyx : y * x = 1⟩ := h x hx 1
have hy : y ≠ 0 := left_ne_zero_of_mul (hyx.symm ▸ one_ne_zero)
obtain ⟨z, hzy : z * y = 1⟩ := h y hy 1
exact ⟨⟨x, y, left_inv_eq_right_inv hzy hyx ▸ hzy, hyx⟩, rfl⟩
theorem isSimpleModule_iff_finrank_eq_one {R} [DivisionRing R] [Module R M] :
IsSimpleModule R M ↔ FiniteDimensional.finrank R M = 1 :=
⟨fun h ↦ have := h.nontrivial; have ⟨v, hv⟩ := exists_ne (0 : M)
(finrank_eq_one_iff_of_nonzero' v hv).mpr (IsSimpleModule.toSpanSingleton_surjective R hv),
is_simple_module_of_finrank_eq_one⟩
theorem IsSemisimpleModule.of_sSup_simples_eq_top
(h : sSup { m : Submodule R M | IsSimpleModule R m } = ⊤) : IsSemisimpleModule R M :=
complementedLattice_of_sSup_atoms_eq_top (by simp_rw [← h, isSimpleModule_iff_isAtom])
#align is_semisimple_of_Sup_simples_eq_top IsSemisimpleModule.of_sSup_simples_eq_top
@[deprecated]
alias is_semisimple_of_sSup_simples_eq_top := IsSemisimpleModule.of_sSup_simples_eq_top
namespace IsSemisimpleModule
variable [IsSemisimpleModule R M]
theorem eq_bot_or_exists_simple_le (N : Submodule R M) : N = ⊥ ∨ ∃ m ≤ N, IsSimpleModule R m := by
simpa only [isSimpleModule_iff_isAtom, and_comm] using eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le _
theorem sSup_simples_le (N : Submodule R M) :
sSup { m : Submodule R M | IsSimpleModule R m ∧ m ≤ N } = N := by
simpa only [isSimpleModule_iff_isAtom] using sSup_atoms_le_eq _
variable (R M)
theorem exists_simple_submodule [Nontrivial M] : ∃ m : Submodule R M, IsSimpleModule R m := by
simpa only [isSimpleModule_iff_isAtom] using IsAtomic.exists_atom _
theorem sSup_simples_eq_top : sSup { m : Submodule R M | IsSimpleModule R m } = ⊤ := by
simpa only [isSimpleModule_iff_isAtom] using sSup_atoms_eq_top
#align is_semisimple_module.Sup_simples_eq_top IsSemisimpleModule.sSup_simples_eq_top
/-- The annihilator of a semisimple module over a commutative ring is a radical ideal. -/
theorem annihilator_isRadical (R) [CommRing R] [Module R M] [IsSemisimpleModule R M] :
(Module.annihilator R M).IsRadical := by
rw [← Submodule.annihilator_top, ← sSup_simples_eq_top, sSup_eq_iSup', Submodule.annihilator_iSup]
exact Ideal.isRadical_iInf _ fun i ↦ (i.2.annihilator_isMaximal).isPrime.isRadical
instance submodule {m : Submodule R M} : IsSemisimpleModule R m :=
m.mapIic.complementedLattice_iff.2 IsModularLattice.complementedLattice_Iic
#align is_semisimple_module.is_semisimple_submodule IsSemisimpleModule.submodule
variable {R M}
open LinearMap
theorem congr [IsSemisimpleModule R N] (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : IsSemisimpleModule R M :=
(Submodule.orderIsoMapComap e.symm).complementedLattice
instance quotient : IsSemisimpleModule R (M ⧸ m) :=
have ⟨P, compl⟩ := exists_isCompl m
.congr (m.quotientEquivOfIsCompl P compl)
-- does not work as an instance, not sure why
protected theorem range (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : IsSemisimpleModule R (range f) :=
.congr (quotKerEquivRange _).symm
section
variable [Module S N] {σ : R →+* S} [RingHomSurjective σ] (l : M →ₛₗ[σ] N)
theorem _root_.LinearMap.isSemisimpleModule_iff_of_bijective (hl : Function.Bijective l) :
IsSemisimpleModule R M ↔ IsSemisimpleModule S N :=
(Submodule.orderIsoMapComapOfBijective l hl).complementedLattice_iff
-- TODO: generalize Submodule.equivMapOfInjective from InvPair to RingHomSurjective
proof_wanted _root_.LinearMap.isSemisimpleModule_of_injective (_ : Function.Injective l)
[IsSemisimpleModule S N] : IsSemisimpleModule R M
--TODO: generalize LinearMap.quotKerEquivOfSurjective to SemilinearMaps + RingHomSurjective
proof_wanted _root_.LinearMap.isSemisimpleModule_of_surjective (_ : Function.Surjective l)
[IsSemisimpleModule R M] : IsSemisimpleModule S N
end
end IsSemisimpleModule
/-- A module is semisimple iff it is generated by its simple submodules. -/
theorem sSup_simples_eq_top_iff_isSemisimpleModule :
sSup { m : Submodule R M | IsSimpleModule R m } = ⊤ ↔ IsSemisimpleModule R M :=
⟨.of_sSup_simples_eq_top, fun _ ↦ IsSemisimpleModule.sSup_simples_eq_top _ _⟩
#align is_semisimple_iff_top_eq_Sup_simples sSup_simples_eq_top_iff_isSemisimpleModule
@[deprecated]
alias is_semisimple_iff_top_eq_sSup_simples := sSup_simples_eq_top_iff_isSemisimpleModule
/-- A module generated by semisimple submodules is itself semisimple. -/
lemma isSemisimpleModule_of_isSemisimpleModule_submodule {s : Set ι} {p : ι → Submodule R M}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, IsSemisimpleModule R (p i)) (hp' : ⨆ i ∈ s, p i = ⊤) :
IsSemisimpleModule R M := by
refine complementedLattice_of_complementedLattice_Iic (fun i hi ↦ ?_) hp'
simpa only [← (p i).mapIic.complementedLattice_iff] using hp i hi
lemma isSemisimpleModule_biSup_of_isSemisimpleModule_submodule {s : Set ι} {p : ι → Submodule R M}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, IsSemisimpleModule R (p i)) :
IsSemisimpleModule R ↥(⨆ i ∈ s, p i) := by
let q := ⨆ i ∈ s, p i
let p' : ι → Submodule R q := fun i ↦ (p i).comap q.subtype
have hp₀ : ∀ i ∈ s, p i ≤ LinearMap.range q.subtype := fun i hi ↦ by
simpa only [Submodule.range_subtype] using le_biSup _ hi
have hp₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, IsSemisimpleModule R (p' i) := fun i hi ↦ by
let e : p' i ≃ₗ[R] p i := (p i).comap_equiv_self_of_inj_of_le q.injective_subtype (hp₀ i hi)
exact (Submodule.orderIsoMapComap e).complementedLattice_iff.mpr <| hp i hi
have hp₂ : ⨆ i ∈ s, p' i = ⊤ := by
apply Submodule.map_injective_of_injective q.injective_subtype
simp_rw [Submodule.map_top, Submodule.range_subtype, Submodule.map_iSup]
exact biSup_congr fun i hi ↦ Submodule.map_comap_eq_of_le (hp₀ i hi)
exact isSemisimpleModule_of_isSemisimpleModule_submodule hp₁ hp₂
lemma isSemisimpleModule_of_isSemisimpleModule_submodule' {p : ι → Submodule R M}
(hp : ∀ i, IsSemisimpleModule R (p i)) (hp' : ⨆ i, p i = ⊤) :
IsSemisimpleModule R M :=
isSemisimpleModule_of_isSemisimpleModule_submodule (s := Set.univ) (fun i _ ↦ hp i) (by simpa)
theorem IsSemisimpleModule.sup {p q : Submodule R M}
(_ : IsSemisimpleModule R p) (_ : IsSemisimpleModule R q) :
IsSemisimpleModule R ↥(p ⊔ q) := by
let f : Bool → Submodule R M := Bool.rec q p
rw [show p ⊔ q = ⨆ i ∈ Set.univ, f i by rw [iSup_univ, iSup_bool_eq]]
exact isSemisimpleModule_biSup_of_isSemisimpleModule_submodule (by rintro (_|_) _ <;> assumption)
instance IsSemisimpleRing.isSemisimpleModule [IsSemisimpleRing R] : IsSemisimpleModule R M :=
have : IsSemisimpleModule R (M →₀ R) := isSemisimpleModule_of_isSemisimpleModule_submodule'
(fun _ ↦ .congr (LinearMap.quotKerEquivRange _).symm) Finsupp.iSup_lsingle_range
.congr (LinearMap.quotKerEquivOfSurjective _ <| Finsupp.total_id_surjective R M).symm
open LinearMap in
/-- A finite product of semisimple rings is semisimple. -/
instance {ι} [Finite ι] (R : ι → Type*) [∀ i, Ring (R i)] [∀ i, IsSemisimpleRing (R i)] :
IsSemisimpleRing (∀ i, R i) := by
letI (i) : Module (∀ i, R i) (R i) := Module.compHom _ (Pi.evalRingHom R i)
let e (i) : R i →ₛₗ[Pi.evalRingHom R i] R i :=
{ AddMonoidHom.id (R i) with map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
have (i) : IsSemisimpleModule (∀ i, R i) (R i) :=
((e i).isSemisimpleModule_iff_of_bijective Function.bijective_id).mpr inferInstance
classical
exact isSemisimpleModule_of_isSemisimpleModule_submodule' (p := (range <| single ·))
(fun i ↦ .range _) (by simp_rw [range_eq_map, Submodule.iSup_map_single, Submodule.pi_top])
/-- A binary product of semisimple rings is semisimple. -/
instance [hR : IsSemisimpleRing R] [hS : IsSemisimpleRing S] : IsSemisimpleRing (R × S) := by
letI : Module (R × S) R := Module.compHom _ (.fst R S)
letI : Module (R × S) S := Module.compHom _ (.snd R S)
-- e₁, e₂ got falsely flagged by the unused argument linter
let _e₁ : R →ₛₗ[.fst R S] R := { AddMonoidHom.id R with map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
let _e₂ : S →ₛₗ[.snd R S] S := { AddMonoidHom.id S with map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
rw [IsSemisimpleRing, ← _e₁.isSemisimpleModule_iff_of_bijective Function.bijective_id] at hR
rw [IsSemisimpleRing, ← _e₂.isSemisimpleModule_iff_of_bijective Function.bijective_id] at hS
rw [IsSemisimpleRing, ← Submodule.topEquiv.isSemisimpleModule_iff_of_bijective
(LinearEquiv.bijective _), ← LinearMap.sup_range_inl_inr]
exact .sup (.range _) (.range _)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/SimpleModule.lean | 324 | 330 | theorem RingHom.isSemisimpleRing_of_surjective (f : R →+* S) (hf : Function.Surjective f)
[IsSemisimpleRing R] : IsSemisimpleRing S := by |
letI : Module R S := Module.compHom _ f
haveI : RingHomSurjective f := ⟨hf⟩
let e : S →ₛₗ[f] S := { AddMonoidHom.id S with map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
rw [IsSemisimpleRing, ← e.isSemisimpleModule_iff_of_bijective Function.bijective_id]
infer_instance
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
-- Porting note: can't derive `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited`
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
#align real.angle Real.Angle
namespace Angle
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
-- also, without this, a plain `QuotientAddGroup.mk`
-- causes coerced terms to be of type `ℝ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π)`
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
#align real.angle.continuous_coe Real.Angle.continuous_coe
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
#align real.angle.coe_hom Real.Angle.coeHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_coe_hom Real.Angle.coe_coeHom
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
#align real.angle.induction_on Real.Angle.induction_on
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zero Real.Angle.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_add Real.Angle.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_neg Real.Angle.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_sub Real.Angle.coe_sub
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_nsmul Real.Angle.coe_nsmul
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zsmul Real.Angle.coe_zsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul Real.Angle.natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul Real.Angle.intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul := natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul := intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
-- Porting note: added `rw`, `simp [Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]` doesn't fire otherwise
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
#align real.angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
#align real.angle.coe_two_pi Real.Angle.coe_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align real.angle.neg_coe_pi Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.zsmul_eq_iff
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
-- Porting note: no `Int.natAbs_bit0` anymore
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.eq_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.eq_neg_self_iff
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.ne_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.ne_neg_self_iff
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
#align real.angle.neg_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_eq_self_iff
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.neg_ne_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_ne_self_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ) :) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc hc; · exact hc
cases' sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false_iff, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
#align real.angle.cos_sin_inj Real.Angle.cos_sin_inj
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.sin Real.Angle.sin
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.sin_coe Real.Angle.sin_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_sin Real.Angle.continuous_sin
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.cos Real.Angle.cos
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.cos_coe Real.Angle.cos_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_cos Real.Angle.continuous_cos
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_zero Real.Angle.sin_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
#align real.angle.sin_coe_pi Real.Angle.sin_coe_pi
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
#align real.angle.sin_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.sin_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
#align real.angle.sin_neg Real.Angle.sin_neg
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.sin_antiperiodic Real.Angle.sin_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi Real.Angle.sin_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
#align real.angle.cos_zero Real.Angle.cos_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
#align real.angle.cos_coe_pi Real.Angle.cos_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
#align real.angle.cos_neg Real.Angle.cos_neg
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.cos_antiperiodic Real.Angle.cos_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi Real.Angle.cos_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.cos_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
#align real.angle.sin_add Real.Angle.sin_add
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
#align real.angle.cos_add Real.Angle.cos_add
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
#align real.angle.cos_sq_add_sin_sq Real.Angle.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi_div_two Real.Angle.sin_add_pi_div_two
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi_div_two Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi_div_two
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
#align real.angle.sin_pi_div_two_sub Real.Angle.sin_pi_div_two_sub
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_add_pi_div_two
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi_div_two
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
#align real.angle.cos_pi_div_two_sub Real.Angle.cos_pi_div_two_sub
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
#align real.angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.angle.coe_to_Ico_mod Real.Angle.coe_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.angle.coe_to_Ioc_mod Real.Angle.coe_toIocMod
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
#align real.angle.to_real Real.Angle.toReal
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
#align real.angle.to_real_coe Real.Angle.toReal_coe
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
#align real.angle.to_real_injective Real.Angle.toReal_injective
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
#align real.angle.to_real_inj Real.Angle.toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
#align real.angle.coe_to_real Real.Angle.coe_toReal
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
#align real.angle.neg_pi_lt_to_real Real.Angle.neg_pi_lt_toReal
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
#align real.angle.to_real_le_pi Real.Angle.toReal_le_pi
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_le_pi Real.Angle.abs_toReal_le_pi
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_mem_Ioc Real.Angle.toReal_mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
#align real.angle.to_Ioc_mod_to_real Real.Angle.toIocMod_toReal
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 586 | 588 | theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by |
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
#align_import data.nat.dist from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d50b12ae8e2bd910d08a94823976adae9825718b"
/-!
# Distance function on ℕ
This file defines a simple distance function on naturals from truncated subtraction.
-/
namespace Nat
/-- Distance (absolute value of difference) between natural numbers. -/
def dist (n m : ℕ) :=
n - m + (m - n)
#align nat.dist Nat.dist
-- Should be aligned to `Nat.dist.eq_def`, but that is generated on demand and isn't present yet.
#noalign nat.dist.def
theorem dist_comm (n m : ℕ) : dist n m = dist m n := by simp [dist, add_comm]
#align nat.dist_comm Nat.dist_comm
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (n : ℕ) : dist n n = 0 := by simp [dist, tsub_self]
#align nat.dist_self Nat.dist_self
theorem eq_of_dist_eq_zero {n m : ℕ} (h : dist n m = 0) : n = m :=
have : n - m = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right h
have : n ≤ m := tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp this
have : m - n = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h
have : m ≤ n := tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp this
le_antisymm ‹n ≤ m› ‹m ≤ n›
#align nat.eq_of_dist_eq_zero Nat.eq_of_dist_eq_zero
theorem dist_eq_zero {n m : ℕ} (h : n = m) : dist n m = 0 := by rw [h, dist_self]
#align nat.dist_eq_zero Nat.dist_eq_zero
theorem dist_eq_sub_of_le {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : dist n m = m - n := by
rw [dist, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr h, zero_add]
#align nat.dist_eq_sub_of_le Nat.dist_eq_sub_of_le
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Dist.lean | 49 | 50 | theorem dist_eq_sub_of_le_right {n m : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : dist n m = n - m := by |
rw [dist_comm]; apply dist_eq_sub_of_le h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import data.nat.pairing from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"207cfac9fcd06138865b5d04f7091e46d9320432"
/-!
# Naturals pairing function
This file defines a pairing function for the naturals as follows:
```text
0 1 4 9 16
2 3 5 10 17
6 7 8 11 18
12 13 14 15 19
20 21 22 23 24
```
It has the advantage of being monotone in both directions and sending `⟦0, n^2 - 1⟧` to
`⟦0, n - 1⟧²`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Prod Decidable Function
namespace Nat
/-- Pairing function for the natural numbers. -/
-- Porting note: no pp_nodot
--@[pp_nodot]
def pair (a b : ℕ) : ℕ :=
if a < b then b * b + a else a * a + a + b
#align nat.mkpair Nat.pair
/-- Unpairing function for the natural numbers. -/
-- Porting note: no pp_nodot
--@[pp_nodot]
def unpair (n : ℕ) : ℕ × ℕ :=
let s := sqrt n
if n - s * s < s then (n - s * s, s) else (s, n - s * s - s)
#align nat.unpair Nat.unpair
@[simp]
theorem pair_unpair (n : ℕ) : pair (unpair n).1 (unpair n).2 = n := by
dsimp only [unpair]; let s := sqrt n
have sm : s * s + (n - s * s) = n := Nat.add_sub_cancel' (sqrt_le _)
split_ifs with h
· simp [pair, h, sm]
· have hl : n - s * s - s ≤ s := Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add.2
(Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 <| by rw [← Nat.add_assoc]; apply sqrt_le_add)
simp [pair, hl.not_lt, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_sub_cancel' (le_of_not_gt h), sm]
#align nat.mkpair_unpair Nat.pair_unpair
theorem pair_unpair' {n a b} (H : unpair n = (a, b)) : pair a b = n := by
simpa [H] using pair_unpair n
#align nat.mkpair_unpair' Nat.pair_unpair'
@[simp]
theorem unpair_pair (a b : ℕ) : unpair (pair a b) = (a, b) := by
dsimp only [pair]; split_ifs with h
· show unpair (b * b + a) = (a, b)
have be : sqrt (b * b + a) = b := sqrt_add_eq _ (le_trans (le_of_lt h) (Nat.le_add_left _ _))
simp [unpair, be, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, h]
· show unpair (a * a + a + b) = (a, b)
have ae : sqrt (a * a + (a + b)) = a := by
rw [sqrt_add_eq]
exact Nat.add_le_add_left (le_of_not_gt h) _
simp [unpair, ae, Nat.not_lt_zero, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
#align nat.unpair_mkpair Nat.unpair_pair
/-- An equivalence between `ℕ × ℕ` and `ℕ`. -/
@[simps (config := .asFn)]
def pairEquiv : ℕ × ℕ ≃ ℕ :=
⟨uncurry pair, unpair, fun ⟨a, b⟩ => unpair_pair a b, pair_unpair⟩
#align nat.mkpair_equiv Nat.pairEquiv
#align nat.mkpair_equiv_apply Nat.pairEquiv_apply
#align nat.mkpair_equiv_symm_apply Nat.pairEquiv_symm_apply
theorem surjective_unpair : Surjective unpair :=
pairEquiv.symm.surjective
#align nat.surjective_unpair Nat.surjective_unpair
@[simp]
theorem pair_eq_pair {a b c d : ℕ} : pair a b = pair c d ↔ a = c ∧ b = d :=
pairEquiv.injective.eq_iff.trans (@Prod.ext_iff ℕ ℕ (a, b) (c, d))
#align nat.mkpair_eq_mkpair Nat.pair_eq_pair
theorem unpair_lt {n : ℕ} (n1 : 1 ≤ n) : (unpair n).1 < n := by
let s := sqrt n
simp only [unpair, ge_iff_le, Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add]
by_cases h : n - s * s < s <;> simp [h]
· exact lt_of_lt_of_le h (sqrt_le_self _)
· simp at h
have s0 : 0 < s := sqrt_pos.2 n1
exact lt_of_le_of_lt h (Nat.sub_lt n1 (Nat.mul_pos s0 s0))
#align nat.unpair_lt Nat.unpair_lt
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Pairing.lean | 104 | 106 | theorem unpair_zero : unpair 0 = 0 := by |
rw [unpair]
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.pi from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Product measures
In this file we define and prove properties about finite products of measures
(and at some point, countable products of measures).
## Main definition
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi`: The product of finitely many σ-finite measures.
Given `μ : (i : ι) → Measure (α i)` for `[Fintype ι]` it has type `Measure ((i : ι) → α i)`.
To apply Fubini's theorem or Tonelli's theorem along some subset, we recommend using the marginal
construction `MeasureTheory.lmarginal` and (todo) `MeasureTheory.marginal`. This allows you to
apply the theorems without any bookkeeping with measurable equivalences.
## Implementation Notes
We define `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.pi`, the product of finitely many outer measures, as the
maximal outer measure `n` with the property that `n (pi univ s) ≤ ∏ i, m i (s i)`,
where `pi univ s` is the product of the sets `{s i | i : ι}`.
We then show that this induces a product of measures, called `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi`.
For a collection of σ-finite measures `μ` and a collection of measurable sets `s` we show that
`Measure.pi μ (pi univ s) = ∏ i, m i (s i)`. To do this, we follow the following steps:
* We know that there is some ordering on `ι`, given by an element of `[Countable ι]`.
* Using this, we have an equivalence `MeasurableEquiv.piMeasurableEquivTProd` between
`∀ ι, α i` and an iterated product of `α i`, called `List.tprod α l` for some list `l`.
* On this iterated product we can easily define a product measure `MeasureTheory.Measure.tprod`
by iterating `MeasureTheory.Measure.prod`
* Using the previous two steps we construct `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi'` on `(i : ι) → α i` for
countable `ι`.
* We know that `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi'` sends products of sets to products of measures, and
since `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi` is the maximal such measure (or at least, it comes from an outer
measure which is the maximal such outer measure), we get the same rule for
`MeasureTheory.Measure.pi`.
## Tags
finitary product measure
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Set MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure Filter MeasurableSpace Encodable
open scoped Classical Topology ENNReal
universe u v
variable {ι ι' : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
/-! We start with some measurability properties -/
/-- Boxes formed by π-systems form a π-system. -/
theorem IsPiSystem.pi {C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))} (hC : ∀ i, IsPiSystem (C i)) :
IsPiSystem (pi univ '' pi univ C) := by
rintro _ ⟨s₁, hs₁, rfl⟩ _ ⟨s₂, hs₂, rfl⟩ hst
rw [← pi_inter_distrib] at hst ⊢; rw [univ_pi_nonempty_iff] at hst
exact mem_image_of_mem _ fun i _ => hC i _ (hs₁ i (mem_univ i)) _ (hs₂ i (mem_univ i)) (hst i)
#align is_pi_system.pi IsPiSystem.pi
/-- Boxes form a π-system. -/
theorem isPiSystem_pi [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] :
IsPiSystem (pi univ '' pi univ fun i => { s : Set (α i) | MeasurableSet s }) :=
IsPiSystem.pi fun _ => isPiSystem_measurableSet
#align is_pi_system_pi isPiSystem_pi
section Finite
variable [Finite ι] [Finite ι']
/-- Boxes of countably spanning sets are countably spanning. -/
theorem IsCountablySpanning.pi {C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))} (hC : ∀ i, IsCountablySpanning (C i)) :
IsCountablySpanning (pi univ '' pi univ C) := by
choose s h1s h2s using hC
cases nonempty_encodable (ι → ℕ)
let e : ℕ → ι → ℕ := fun n => (@decode (ι → ℕ) _ n).iget
refine ⟨fun n => Set.pi univ fun i => s i (e n i), fun n =>
mem_image_of_mem _ fun i _ => h1s i _, ?_⟩
simp_rw [(surjective_decode_iget (ι → ℕ)).iUnion_comp fun x => Set.pi univ fun i => s i (x i),
iUnion_univ_pi s, h2s, pi_univ]
#align is_countably_spanning.pi IsCountablySpanning.pi
/-- The product of generated σ-algebras is the one generated by boxes, if both generating sets
are countably spanning. -/
theorem generateFrom_pi_eq {C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))} (hC : ∀ i, IsCountablySpanning (C i)) :
(@MeasurableSpace.pi _ _ fun i => generateFrom (C i)) =
generateFrom (pi univ '' pi univ C) := by
cases nonempty_encodable ι
apply le_antisymm
· refine iSup_le ?_; intro i; rw [comap_generateFrom]
apply generateFrom_le; rintro _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩; dsimp
choose t h1t h2t using hC
simp_rw [eval_preimage, ← h2t]
rw [← @iUnion_const _ ℕ _ s]
have : Set.pi univ (update (fun i' : ι => iUnion (t i')) i (⋃ _ : ℕ, s)) =
Set.pi univ fun k => ⋃ j : ℕ,
@update ι (fun i' => Set (α i')) _ (fun i' => t i' j) i s k := by
ext; simp_rw [mem_univ_pi]; apply forall_congr'; intro i'
by_cases h : i' = i
· subst h; simp
· rw [← Ne] at h; simp [h]
rw [this, ← iUnion_univ_pi]
apply MeasurableSet.iUnion
intro n; apply measurableSet_generateFrom
apply mem_image_of_mem; intro j _; dsimp only
by_cases h : j = i
· subst h; rwa [update_same]
· rw [update_noteq h]; apply h1t
· apply generateFrom_le; rintro _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
rw [univ_pi_eq_iInter]; apply MeasurableSet.iInter; intro i
apply @measurable_pi_apply _ _ (fun i => generateFrom (C i))
exact measurableSet_generateFrom (hs i (mem_univ i))
#align generate_from_pi_eq generateFrom_pi_eq
/-- If `C` and `D` generate the σ-algebras on `α` resp. `β`, then rectangles formed by `C` and `D`
generate the σ-algebra on `α × β`. -/
theorem generateFrom_eq_pi [h : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] {C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))}
(hC : ∀ i, generateFrom (C i) = h i) (h2C : ∀ i, IsCountablySpanning (C i)) :
generateFrom (pi univ '' pi univ C) = MeasurableSpace.pi := by
simp only [← funext hC, generateFrom_pi_eq h2C]
#align generate_from_eq_pi generateFrom_eq_pi
/-- The product σ-algebra is generated from boxes, i.e. `s ×ˢ t` for sets `s : set α` and
`t : set β`. -/
theorem generateFrom_pi [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] :
generateFrom (pi univ '' pi univ fun i => { s : Set (α i) | MeasurableSet s }) =
MeasurableSpace.pi :=
generateFrom_eq_pi (fun _ => generateFrom_measurableSet) fun _ =>
isCountablySpanning_measurableSet
#align generate_from_pi generateFrom_pi
end Finite
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [Fintype ι] {m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)}
/-- An upper bound for the measure in a finite product space.
It is defined to by taking the image of the set under all projections, and taking the product
of the measures of these images.
For measurable boxes it is equal to the correct measure. -/
@[simp]
def piPremeasure (m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)) (s : Set (∀ i, α i)) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
∏ i, m i (eval i '' s)
#align measure_theory.pi_premeasure MeasureTheory.piPremeasure
theorem piPremeasure_pi {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (hs : (pi univ s).Nonempty) :
piPremeasure m (pi univ s) = ∏ i, m i (s i) := by simp [hs, piPremeasure]
#align measure_theory.pi_premeasure_pi MeasureTheory.piPremeasure_pi
theorem piPremeasure_pi' {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} : piPremeasure m (pi univ s) = ∏ i, m i (s i) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp [piPremeasure]
rcases (pi univ s).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· rcases univ_pi_eq_empty_iff.mp h with ⟨i, hi⟩
have : ∃ i, m i (s i) = 0 := ⟨i, by simp [hi]⟩
simpa [h, Finset.card_univ, zero_pow Fintype.card_ne_zero, @eq_comm _ (0 : ℝ≥0∞),
Finset.prod_eq_zero_iff, piPremeasure]
· simp [h, piPremeasure]
#align measure_theory.pi_premeasure_pi' MeasureTheory.piPremeasure_pi'
theorem piPremeasure_pi_mono {s t : Set (∀ i, α i)} (h : s ⊆ t) :
piPremeasure m s ≤ piPremeasure m t :=
Finset.prod_le_prod' fun _ _ => measure_mono (image_subset _ h)
#align measure_theory.pi_premeasure_pi_mono MeasureTheory.piPremeasure_pi_mono
theorem piPremeasure_pi_eval {s : Set (∀ i, α i)} :
piPremeasure m (pi univ fun i => eval i '' s) = piPremeasure m s := by
simp only [eval, piPremeasure_pi']; rfl
#align measure_theory.pi_premeasure_pi_eval MeasureTheory.piPremeasure_pi_eval
namespace OuterMeasure
/-- `OuterMeasure.pi m` is the finite product of the outer measures `{m i | i : ι}`.
It is defined to be the maximal outer measure `n` with the property that
`n (pi univ s) ≤ ∏ i, m i (s i)`, where `pi univ s` is the product of the sets
`{s i | i : ι}`. -/
protected def pi (m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)) : OuterMeasure (∀ i, α i) :=
boundedBy (piPremeasure m)
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.pi MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.pi
theorem pi_pi_le (m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)) (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
OuterMeasure.pi m (pi univ s) ≤ ∏ i, m i (s i) := by
rcases (pi univ s).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h]
exact (boundedBy_le _).trans_eq (piPremeasure_pi h)
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.pi_pi_le MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.pi_pi_le
theorem le_pi {m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)} {n : OuterMeasure (∀ i, α i)} :
n ≤ OuterMeasure.pi m ↔
∀ s : ∀ i, Set (α i), (pi univ s).Nonempty → n (pi univ s) ≤ ∏ i, m i (s i) := by
rw [OuterMeasure.pi, le_boundedBy']; constructor
· intro h s hs; refine (h _ hs).trans_eq (piPremeasure_pi hs)
· intro h s hs; refine le_trans (n.mono <| subset_pi_eval_image univ s) (h _ ?_)
simp [univ_pi_nonempty_iff, hs]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.le_pi MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.le_pi
end OuterMeasure
namespace Measure
variable [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] (μ : ∀ i, Measure (α i))
section Tprod
open List
variable {δ : Type*} {π : δ → Type*} [∀ x, MeasurableSpace (π x)]
-- for some reason the equation compiler doesn't like this definition
/-- A product of measures in `tprod α l`. -/
protected def tprod (l : List δ) (μ : ∀ i, Measure (π i)) : Measure (TProd π l) := by
induction' l with i l ih
· exact dirac PUnit.unit
· have := (μ i).prod (α := π i) ih
exact this
#align measure_theory.measure.tprod MeasureTheory.Measure.tprod
@[simp]
theorem tprod_nil (μ : ∀ i, Measure (π i)) : Measure.tprod [] μ = dirac PUnit.unit :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.tprod_nil MeasureTheory.Measure.tprod_nil
@[simp]
theorem tprod_cons (i : δ) (l : List δ) (μ : ∀ i, Measure (π i)) :
Measure.tprod (i :: l) μ = (μ i).prod (Measure.tprod l μ) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.tprod_cons MeasureTheory.Measure.tprod_cons
instance sigmaFinite_tprod (l : List δ) (μ : ∀ i, Measure (π i)) [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] :
SigmaFinite (Measure.tprod l μ) := by
induction l with
| nil => rw [tprod_nil]; infer_instance
| cons i l ih => rw [tprod_cons]; exact @prod.instSigmaFinite _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih
#align measure_theory.measure.sigma_finite_tprod MeasureTheory.Measure.sigmaFinite_tprod
theorem tprod_tprod (l : List δ) (μ : ∀ i, Measure (π i)) [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)]
(s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) :
Measure.tprod l μ (Set.tprod l s) = (l.map fun i => (μ i) (s i)).prod := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons a l ih =>
rw [tprod_cons, Set.tprod]
erw [prod_prod] -- TODO: why `rw` fails?
rw [map_cons, prod_cons, ih]
#align measure_theory.measure.tprod_tprod MeasureTheory.Measure.tprod_tprod
end Tprod
section Encodable
open List MeasurableEquiv
variable [Encodable ι]
/-- The product measure on an encodable finite type, defined by mapping `Measure.tprod` along the
equivalence `MeasurableEquiv.piMeasurableEquivTProd`.
The definition `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi` should be used instead of this one. -/
def pi' : Measure (∀ i, α i) :=
Measure.map (TProd.elim' mem_sortedUniv) (Measure.tprod (sortedUniv ι) μ)
#align measure_theory.measure.pi' MeasureTheory.Measure.pi'
theorem pi'_pi [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
pi' μ (pi univ s) = ∏ i, μ i (s i) := by
rw [pi']
rw [← MeasurableEquiv.piMeasurableEquivTProd_symm_apply, MeasurableEquiv.map_apply,
MeasurableEquiv.piMeasurableEquivTProd_symm_apply, elim_preimage_pi, tprod_tprod _ μ, ←
List.prod_toFinset, sortedUniv_toFinset] <;>
exact sortedUniv_nodup ι
#align measure_theory.measure.pi'_pi MeasureTheory.Measure.pi'_pi
end Encodable
theorem pi_caratheodory :
MeasurableSpace.pi ≤ (OuterMeasure.pi fun i => (μ i).toOuterMeasure).caratheodory := by
refine iSup_le ?_
intro i s hs
rw [MeasurableSpace.comap] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
apply boundedBy_caratheodory
intro t
simp_rw [piPremeasure]
refine Finset.prod_add_prod_le' (Finset.mem_univ i) ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp [image_inter_preimage, image_diff_preimage, measure_inter_add_diff _ hs, le_refl]
· rintro j - _; gcongr; apply inter_subset_left
· rintro j - _; gcongr; apply diff_subset
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_caratheodory MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_caratheodory
/-- `Measure.pi μ` is the finite product of the measures `{μ i | i : ι}`.
It is defined to be measure corresponding to `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.pi`. -/
protected irreducible_def pi : Measure (∀ i, α i) :=
toMeasure (OuterMeasure.pi fun i => (μ i).toOuterMeasure) (pi_caratheodory μ)
#align measure_theory.measure.pi MeasureTheory.Measure.pi
-- Porting note: moved from below so that instances about `Measure.pi` and `MeasureSpace.pi`
-- go together
instance _root_.MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace.pi {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] :
MeasureSpace (∀ i, α i) :=
⟨Measure.pi fun _ => volume⟩
#align measure_theory.measure_space.pi MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace.pi
theorem pi_pi_aux [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) :
Measure.pi μ (pi univ s) = ∏ i, μ i (s i) := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [Measure.pi, toMeasure_apply _ _ (MeasurableSet.pi countable_univ fun i _ => hs i)]
apply OuterMeasure.pi_pi_le
· haveI : Encodable ι := Fintype.toEncodable ι
simp_rw [← pi'_pi μ s, Measure.pi,
toMeasure_apply _ _ (MeasurableSet.pi countable_univ fun i _ => hs i)]
suffices (pi' μ).toOuterMeasure ≤ OuterMeasure.pi fun i => (μ i).toOuterMeasure by exact this _
clear hs s
rw [OuterMeasure.le_pi]
intro s _
exact (pi'_pi μ s).le
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_pi_aux MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_pi_aux
variable {μ}
/-- `Measure.pi μ` has finite spanning sets in rectangles of finite spanning sets. -/
def FiniteSpanningSetsIn.pi {C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))}
(hμ : ∀ i, (μ i).FiniteSpanningSetsIn (C i)) :
(Measure.pi μ).FiniteSpanningSetsIn (pi univ '' pi univ C) := by
haveI := fun i => (hμ i).sigmaFinite
haveI := Fintype.toEncodable ι
refine ⟨fun n => Set.pi univ fun i => (hμ i).set ((@decode (ι → ℕ) _ n).iget i),
fun n => ?_, fun n => ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
-- TODO (kmill) If this let comes before the refine, while the noncomputability checker
-- correctly sees this definition is computable, the Lean VM fails to see the binding is
-- computationally irrelevant. The `noncomputable section` doesn't help because all it does
-- is insert `noncomputable` for you when necessary.
let e : ℕ → ι → ℕ := fun n => (@decode (ι → ℕ) _ n).iget
· refine mem_image_of_mem _ fun i _ => (hμ i).set_mem _
· calc
Measure.pi μ (Set.pi univ fun i => (hμ i).set (e n i)) ≤
Measure.pi μ (Set.pi univ fun i => toMeasurable (μ i) ((hμ i).set (e n i))) :=
measure_mono (pi_mono fun i _ => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = ∏ i, μ i (toMeasurable (μ i) ((hμ i).set (e n i))) :=
(pi_pi_aux μ _ fun i => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = ∏ i, μ i ((hμ i).set (e n i)) := by simp only [measure_toMeasurable]
_ < ∞ := ENNReal.prod_lt_top fun i _ => ((hμ i).finite _).ne
· simp_rw [(surjective_decode_iget (ι → ℕ)).iUnion_comp fun x =>
Set.pi univ fun i => (hμ i).set (x i),
iUnion_univ_pi fun i => (hμ i).set, (hμ _).spanning, Set.pi_univ]
#align measure_theory.measure.finite_spanning_sets_in.pi MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteSpanningSetsIn.pi
/-- A measure on a finite product space equals the product measure if they are equal on rectangles
with as sides sets that generate the corresponding σ-algebras. -/
theorem pi_eq_generateFrom {C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))}
(hC : ∀ i, generateFrom (C i) = by apply_assumption) (h2C : ∀ i, IsPiSystem (C i))
(h3C : ∀ i, (μ i).FiniteSpanningSetsIn (C i)) {μν : Measure (∀ i, α i)}
(h₁ : ∀ s : ∀ i, Set (α i), (∀ i, s i ∈ C i) → μν (pi univ s) = ∏ i, μ i (s i)) :
Measure.pi μ = μν := by
have h4C : ∀ (i) (s : Set (α i)), s ∈ C i → MeasurableSet s := by
intro i s hs; rw [← hC]; exact measurableSet_generateFrom hs
refine
(FiniteSpanningSetsIn.pi h3C).ext
(generateFrom_eq_pi hC fun i => (h3C i).isCountablySpanning).symm (IsPiSystem.pi h2C) ?_
rintro _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
rw [mem_univ_pi] at hs
haveI := fun i => (h3C i).sigmaFinite
simp_rw [h₁ s hs, pi_pi_aux μ s fun i => h4C i _ (hs i)]
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_eq_generate_from MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_eq_generateFrom
variable [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)]
/-- A measure on a finite product space equals the product measure if they are equal on
rectangles. -/
theorem pi_eq {μ' : Measure (∀ i, α i)}
(h : ∀ s : ∀ i, Set (α i), (∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) → μ' (pi univ s) = ∏ i, μ i (s i)) :
Measure.pi μ = μ' :=
pi_eq_generateFrom (fun _ => generateFrom_measurableSet) (fun _ => isPiSystem_measurableSet)
(fun i => (μ i).toFiniteSpanningSetsIn) h
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_eq
variable (μ)
theorem pi'_eq_pi [Encodable ι] : pi' μ = Measure.pi μ :=
Eq.symm <| pi_eq fun s _ => pi'_pi μ s
#align measure_theory.measure.pi'_eq_pi MeasureTheory.Measure.pi'_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem pi_pi (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : Measure.pi μ (pi univ s) = ∏ i, μ i (s i) := by
haveI : Encodable ι := Fintype.toEncodable ι
rw [← pi'_eq_pi, pi'_pi]
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_pi MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_pi
nonrec theorem pi_univ : Measure.pi μ univ = ∏ i, μ i univ := by rw [← pi_univ, pi_pi μ]
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_univ MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_univ
theorem pi_ball [∀ i, MetricSpace (α i)] (x : ∀ i, α i) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
Measure.pi μ (Metric.ball x r) = ∏ i, μ i (Metric.ball (x i) r) := by rw [ball_pi _ hr, pi_pi]
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_ball MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_ball
theorem pi_closedBall [∀ i, MetricSpace (α i)] (x : ∀ i, α i) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
Measure.pi μ (Metric.closedBall x r) = ∏ i, μ i (Metric.closedBall (x i) r) := by
rw [closedBall_pi _ hr, pi_pi]
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_closed_ball MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_closedBall
instance pi.sigmaFinite : SigmaFinite (Measure.pi μ) :=
(FiniteSpanningSetsIn.pi fun i => (μ i).toFiniteSpanningSetsIn).sigmaFinite
#align measure_theory.measure.pi.sigma_finite MeasureTheory.Measure.pi.sigmaFinite
instance {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (α i))] :
SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (∀ i, α i)) :=
pi.sigmaFinite _
instance pi.instIsFiniteMeasure [∀ i, IsFiniteMeasure (μ i)] :
IsFiniteMeasure (Measure.pi μ) :=
⟨Measure.pi_univ μ ▸ ENNReal.prod_lt_top (fun i _ ↦ measure_ne_top (μ i) _)⟩
instance {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] [∀ i, IsFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure (α i))] :
IsFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure (∀ i, α i)) :=
pi.instIsFiniteMeasure _
instance pi.instIsProbabilityMeasure [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μ i)] :
IsProbabilityMeasure (Measure.pi μ) :=
⟨by simp only [Measure.pi_univ, measure_univ, Finset.prod_const_one]⟩
instance {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)]
[∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (volume : Measure (α i))] :
IsProbabilityMeasure (volume : Measure (∀ i, α i)) :=
pi.instIsProbabilityMeasure _
theorem pi_of_empty {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [IsEmpty α] {β : α → Type*}
{m : ∀ a, MeasurableSpace (β a)} (μ : ∀ a : α, Measure (β a)) (x : ∀ a, β a := isEmptyElim) :
Measure.pi μ = dirac x := by
haveI : ∀ a, SigmaFinite (μ a) := isEmptyElim
refine pi_eq fun s _ => ?_
rw [Fintype.prod_empty, dirac_apply_of_mem]
exact isEmptyElim (α := α)
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_of_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_of_empty
lemma volume_pi_eq_dirac {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] [IsEmpty ι]
{α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] (x : ∀ a, α a := isEmptyElim) :
(volume : Measure (∀ i, α i)) = Measure.dirac x :=
Measure.pi_of_empty _ _
@[simp]
theorem pi_empty_univ {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [IsEmpty α] {β : α → Type*}
{m : ∀ α, MeasurableSpace (β α)} (μ : ∀ a : α, Measure (β a)) :
Measure.pi μ (Set.univ) = 1 := by
rw [pi_of_empty, measure_univ]
theorem pi_eval_preimage_null {i : ι} {s : Set (α i)} (hs : μ i s = 0) :
Measure.pi μ (eval i ⁻¹' s) = 0 := by
-- WLOG, `s` is measurable
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs with ⟨t, hst, _, hμt⟩
suffices Measure.pi μ (eval i ⁻¹' t) = 0 from measure_mono_null (preimage_mono hst) this
-- Now rewrite it as `Set.pi`, and apply `pi_pi`
rw [← univ_pi_update_univ, pi_pi]
apply Finset.prod_eq_zero (Finset.mem_univ i)
simp [hμt]
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_eval_preimage_null MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_eval_preimage_null
theorem pi_hyperplane (i : ι) [NoAtoms (μ i)] (x : α i) :
Measure.pi μ { f : ∀ i, α i | f i = x } = 0 :=
show Measure.pi μ (eval i ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 from pi_eval_preimage_null _ (measure_singleton x)
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_hyperplane MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_hyperplane
theorem ae_eval_ne (i : ι) [NoAtoms (μ i)] (x : α i) : ∀ᵐ y : ∀ i, α i ∂Measure.pi μ, y i ≠ x :=
compl_mem_ae_iff.2 (pi_hyperplane μ i x)
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_eval_ne MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_eval_ne
variable {μ}
theorem tendsto_eval_ae_ae {i : ι} : Tendsto (eval i) (ae (Measure.pi μ)) (ae (μ i)) := fun _ hs =>
pi_eval_preimage_null μ hs
#align measure_theory.measure.tendsto_eval_ae_ae MeasureTheory.Measure.tendsto_eval_ae_ae
theorem ae_pi_le_pi : ae (Measure.pi μ) ≤ Filter.pi fun i => ae (μ i) :=
le_iInf fun _ => tendsto_eval_ae_ae.le_comap
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_pi_le_pi MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_pi_le_pi
theorem ae_eq_pi {β : ι → Type*} {f f' : ∀ i, α i → β i} (h : ∀ i, f i =ᵐ[μ i] f' i) :
(fun (x : ∀ i, α i) i => f i (x i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] fun x i => f' i (x i) :=
(eventually_all.2 fun i => tendsto_eval_ae_ae.eventually (h i)).mono fun _ hx => funext hx
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_eq_pi MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_eq_pi
theorem ae_le_pi {β : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (β i)] {f f' : ∀ i, α i → β i}
(h : ∀ i, f i ≤ᵐ[μ i] f' i) :
(fun (x : ∀ i, α i) i => f i (x i)) ≤ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] fun x i => f' i (x i) :=
(eventually_all.2 fun i => tendsto_eval_ae_ae.eventually (h i)).mono fun _ hx => hx
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_le_pi MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_le_pi
theorem ae_le_set_pi {I : Set ι} {s t : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (h : ∀ i ∈ I, s i ≤ᵐ[μ i] t i) :
Set.pi I s ≤ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] Set.pi I t :=
((eventually_all_finite I.toFinite).2 fun i hi => tendsto_eval_ae_ae.eventually (h i hi)).mono
fun _ hst hx i hi => hst i hi <| hx i hi
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_le_set_pi MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_le_set_pi
theorem ae_eq_set_pi {I : Set ι} {s t : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (h : ∀ i ∈ I, s i =ᵐ[μ i] t i) :
Set.pi I s =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] Set.pi I t :=
(ae_le_set_pi fun i hi => (h i hi).le).antisymm (ae_le_set_pi fun i hi => (h i hi).symm.le)
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_eq_set_pi MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_eq_set_pi
section Intervals
variable [∀ i, PartialOrder (α i)] [∀ i, NoAtoms (μ i)]
theorem pi_Iio_ae_eq_pi_Iic {s : Set ι} {f : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi s fun i => Iio (f i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] pi s fun i => Iic (f i) :=
ae_eq_set_pi fun _ _ => Iio_ae_eq_Iic
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_Iio_ae_eq_pi_Iic MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_Iio_ae_eq_pi_Iic
theorem pi_Ioi_ae_eq_pi_Ici {s : Set ι} {f : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi s fun i => Ioi (f i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] pi s fun i => Ici (f i) :=
ae_eq_set_pi fun _ _ => Ioi_ae_eq_Ici
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_Ioi_ae_eq_pi_Ici MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_Ioi_ae_eq_pi_Ici
theorem univ_pi_Iio_ae_eq_Iic {f : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi univ fun i => Iio (f i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] Iic f := by
rw [← pi_univ_Iic]; exact pi_Iio_ae_eq_pi_Iic
#align measure_theory.measure.univ_pi_Iio_ae_eq_Iic MeasureTheory.Measure.univ_pi_Iio_ae_eq_Iic
theorem univ_pi_Ioi_ae_eq_Ici {f : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi univ fun i => Ioi (f i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] Ici f := by
rw [← pi_univ_Ici]; exact pi_Ioi_ae_eq_pi_Ici
#align measure_theory.measure.univ_pi_Ioi_ae_eq_Ici MeasureTheory.Measure.univ_pi_Ioi_ae_eq_Ici
theorem pi_Ioo_ae_eq_pi_Icc {s : Set ι} {f g : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi s fun i => Ioo (f i) (g i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] pi s fun i => Icc (f i) (g i) :=
ae_eq_set_pi fun _ _ => Ioo_ae_eq_Icc
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_Ioo_ae_eq_pi_Icc MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_Ioo_ae_eq_pi_Icc
theorem pi_Ioo_ae_eq_pi_Ioc {s : Set ι} {f g : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi s fun i => Ioo (f i) (g i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] pi s fun i => Ioc (f i) (g i) :=
ae_eq_set_pi fun _ _ => Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_Ioo_ae_eq_pi_Ioc MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_Ioo_ae_eq_pi_Ioc
theorem univ_pi_Ioo_ae_eq_Icc {f g : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi univ fun i => Ioo (f i) (g i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] Icc f g := by
rw [← pi_univ_Icc]; exact pi_Ioo_ae_eq_pi_Icc
#align measure_theory.measure.univ_pi_Ioo_ae_eq_Icc MeasureTheory.Measure.univ_pi_Ioo_ae_eq_Icc
theorem pi_Ioc_ae_eq_pi_Icc {s : Set ι} {f g : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi s fun i => Ioc (f i) (g i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] pi s fun i => Icc (f i) (g i) :=
ae_eq_set_pi fun _ _ => Ioc_ae_eq_Icc
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_Ioc_ae_eq_pi_Icc MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_Ioc_ae_eq_pi_Icc
theorem univ_pi_Ioc_ae_eq_Icc {f g : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi univ fun i => Ioc (f i) (g i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] Icc f g := by
rw [← pi_univ_Icc]; exact pi_Ioc_ae_eq_pi_Icc
#align measure_theory.measure.univ_pi_Ioc_ae_eq_Icc MeasureTheory.Measure.univ_pi_Ioc_ae_eq_Icc
theorem pi_Ico_ae_eq_pi_Icc {s : Set ι} {f g : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi s fun i => Ico (f i) (g i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] pi s fun i => Icc (f i) (g i) :=
ae_eq_set_pi fun _ _ => Ico_ae_eq_Icc
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_Ico_ae_eq_pi_Icc MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_Ico_ae_eq_pi_Icc
theorem univ_pi_Ico_ae_eq_Icc {f g : ∀ i, α i} :
(pi univ fun i => Ico (f i) (g i)) =ᵐ[Measure.pi μ] Icc f g := by
rw [← pi_univ_Icc]; exact pi_Ico_ae_eq_pi_Icc
#align measure_theory.measure.univ_pi_Ico_ae_eq_Icc MeasureTheory.Measure.univ_pi_Ico_ae_eq_Icc
end Intervals
/-- If one of the measures `μ i` has no atoms, them `Measure.pi µ`
has no atoms. The instance below assumes that all `μ i` have no atoms. -/
theorem pi_noAtoms (i : ι) [NoAtoms (μ i)] : NoAtoms (Measure.pi μ) :=
⟨fun x => flip measure_mono_null (pi_hyperplane μ i (x i)) (singleton_subset_iff.2 rfl)⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.pi_has_no_atoms MeasureTheory.Measure.pi_noAtoms
instance pi_noAtoms' [h : Nonempty ι] [∀ i, NoAtoms (μ i)] : NoAtoms (Measure.pi μ) :=
h.elim fun i => pi_noAtoms i
instance {α : ι → Type*} [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)]
[∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (α i))] [∀ i, NoAtoms (volume : Measure (α i))] :
NoAtoms (volume : Measure (∀ i, α i)) :=
pi_noAtoms'
instance pi.isLocallyFiniteMeasure
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] [∀ i, IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (μ i)] :
IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (Measure.pi μ) := by
refine ⟨fun x => ?_⟩
choose s hxs ho hμ using fun i => (μ i).exists_isOpen_measure_lt_top (x i)
refine ⟨pi univ s, set_pi_mem_nhds finite_univ fun i _ => IsOpen.mem_nhds (ho i) (hxs i), ?_⟩
rw [pi_pi]
exact ENNReal.prod_lt_top fun i _ => (hμ i).ne
instance {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, MeasureSpace (X i)]
[∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (X i))]
[∀ i, IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure (X i))] :
IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure (∀ i, X i)) :=
pi.isLocallyFiniteMeasure
variable (μ)
@[to_additive]
instance pi.isMulLeftInvariant [∀ i, Group (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableMul (α i)]
[∀ i, IsMulLeftInvariant (μ i)] : IsMulLeftInvariant (Measure.pi μ) := by
refine ⟨fun v => (pi_eq fun s hs => ?_).symm⟩
rw [map_apply (measurable_const_mul _) (MeasurableSet.univ_pi hs),
show (v * ·) ⁻¹' univ.pi s = univ.pi fun i => (v i * ·) ⁻¹' s i by rfl, pi_pi]
simp_rw [measure_preimage_mul]
#align measure_theory.measure.pi.is_mul_left_invariant MeasureTheory.Measure.pi.isMulLeftInvariant
#align measure_theory.measure.pi.is_add_left_invariant MeasureTheory.Measure.pi.isAddLeftInvariant
@[to_additive]
instance {G : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Group (G i)] [∀ i, MeasureSpace (G i)] [∀ i, MeasurableMul (G i)]
[∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (G i))] [∀ i, IsMulLeftInvariant (volume : Measure (G i))] :
IsMulLeftInvariant (volume : Measure (∀ i, G i)) :=
pi.isMulLeftInvariant _
@[to_additive]
instance pi.isMulRightInvariant [∀ i, Group (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableMul (α i)]
[∀ i, IsMulRightInvariant (μ i)] : IsMulRightInvariant (Measure.pi μ) := by
refine ⟨fun v => (pi_eq fun s hs => ?_).symm⟩
rw [map_apply (measurable_mul_const _) (MeasurableSet.univ_pi hs),
show (· * v) ⁻¹' univ.pi s = univ.pi fun i => (· * v i) ⁻¹' s i by rfl, pi_pi]
simp_rw [measure_preimage_mul_right]
#align measure_theory.measure.pi.is_mul_right_invariant MeasureTheory.Measure.pi.isMulRightInvariant
#align measure_theory.measure.pi.is_add_right_invariant MeasureTheory.Measure.pi.isAddRightInvariant
@[to_additive]
instance {G : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Group (G i)] [∀ i, MeasureSpace (G i)] [∀ i, MeasurableMul (G i)]
[∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (G i))]
[∀ i, IsMulRightInvariant (volume : Measure (G i))] :
IsMulRightInvariant (volume : Measure (∀ i, G i)) :=
pi.isMulRightInvariant _
@[to_additive]
instance pi.isInvInvariant [∀ i, Group (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableInv (α i)]
[∀ i, IsInvInvariant (μ i)] : IsInvInvariant (Measure.pi μ) := by
refine ⟨(Measure.pi_eq fun s hs => ?_).symm⟩
have A : Inv.inv ⁻¹' pi univ s = Set.pi univ fun i => Inv.inv ⁻¹' s i := by ext; simp
simp_rw [Measure.inv, Measure.map_apply measurable_inv (MeasurableSet.univ_pi hs), A, pi_pi,
measure_preimage_inv]
#align measure_theory.measure.pi.is_inv_invariant MeasureTheory.Measure.pi.isInvInvariant
#align measure_theory.measure.pi.is_neg_invariant MeasureTheory.Measure.pi.isNegInvariant
@[to_additive]
instance {G : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Group (G i)] [∀ i, MeasureSpace (G i)] [∀ i, MeasurableInv (G i)]
[∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (G i))] [∀ i, IsInvInvariant (volume : Measure (G i))] :
IsInvInvariant (volume : Measure (∀ i, G i)) :=
pi.isInvInvariant _
instance pi.isOpenPosMeasure [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] [∀ i, IsOpenPosMeasure (μ i)] :
IsOpenPosMeasure (MeasureTheory.Measure.pi μ) := by
constructor
rintro U U_open ⟨a, ha⟩
obtain ⟨s, ⟨hs, hsU⟩⟩ := isOpen_pi_iff'.1 U_open a ha
refine ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (measure_mono hsU))
simp only [pi_pi]
rw [CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring.prod_pos]
intro i _
apply (hs i).1.measure_pos (μ i) ⟨a i, (hs i).2⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.pi.is_open_pos_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.pi.isOpenPosMeasure
instance {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, MeasureSpace (X i)]
[∀ i, IsOpenPosMeasure (volume : Measure (X i))] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (X i))] :
IsOpenPosMeasure (volume : Measure (∀ i, X i)) :=
pi.isOpenPosMeasure _
instance pi.isFiniteMeasureOnCompacts [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)]
[∀ i, IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts (μ i)] :
IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts (MeasureTheory.Measure.pi μ) := by
constructor
intro K hK
suffices Measure.pi μ (Set.univ.pi fun j => Function.eval j '' K) < ⊤ by
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (univ.subset_pi_eval_image K)) this
rw [Measure.pi_pi]
refine WithTop.prod_lt_top ?_
exact fun i _ => ne_of_lt (IsCompact.measure_lt_top (IsCompact.image hK (continuous_apply i)))
#align measure_theory.measure.pi.is_finite_measure_on_compacts MeasureTheory.Measure.pi.isFiniteMeasureOnCompacts
instance {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasureSpace (X i)] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
[∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (X i))]
[∀ i, IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts (volume : Measure (X i))] :
IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts (volume : Measure (∀ i, X i)) :=
pi.isFiniteMeasureOnCompacts _
@[to_additive]
instance pi.isHaarMeasure [∀ i, Group (α i)] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)]
[∀ i, IsHaarMeasure (μ i)] [∀ i, MeasurableMul (α i)] : IsHaarMeasure (Measure.pi μ) where
#align measure_theory.measure.pi.is_haar_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.pi.isHaarMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.pi.is_add_haar_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.pi.isAddHaarMeasure
@[to_additive]
instance {G : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Group (G i)] [∀ i, MeasureSpace (G i)] [∀ i, MeasurableMul (G i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (G i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (G i))]
[∀ i, IsHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (G i))] : IsHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (∀ i, G i)) :=
pi.isHaarMeasure _
end Measure
theorem volume_pi [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] :
(volume : Measure (∀ i, α i)) = Measure.pi fun _ => volume :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.volume_pi MeasureTheory.volume_pi
theorem volume_pi_pi [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (α i))]
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : volume (pi univ s) = ∏ i, volume (s i) :=
Measure.pi_pi (fun _ => volume) s
#align measure_theory.volume_pi_pi MeasureTheory.volume_pi_pi
theorem volume_pi_ball [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (α i))]
[∀ i, MetricSpace (α i)] (x : ∀ i, α i) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
volume (Metric.ball x r) = ∏ i, volume (Metric.ball (x i) r) :=
Measure.pi_ball _ _ hr
#align measure_theory.volume_pi_ball MeasureTheory.volume_pi_ball
theorem volume_pi_closedBall [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (α i))]
[∀ i, MetricSpace (α i)] (x : ∀ i, α i) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
volume (Metric.closedBall x r) = ∏ i, volume (Metric.closedBall (x i) r) :=
Measure.pi_closedBall _ _ hr
#align measure_theory.volume_pi_closed_ball MeasureTheory.volume_pi_closedBall
open Measure
/-- We intentionally restrict this only to the nondependent function space, since type-class
inference cannot find an instance for `ι → ℝ` when this is stated for dependent function spaces. -/
@[to_additive "We intentionally restrict this only to the nondependent function space, since
type-class inference cannot find an instance for `ι → ℝ` when this is stated for dependent function
spaces."]
instance Pi.isMulLeftInvariant_volume {α} [Group α] [MeasureSpace α]
[SigmaFinite (volume : Measure α)] [MeasurableMul α] [IsMulLeftInvariant (volume : Measure α)] :
IsMulLeftInvariant (volume : Measure (ι → α)) :=
pi.isMulLeftInvariant _
#align measure_theory.pi.is_mul_left_invariant_volume MeasureTheory.Pi.isMulLeftInvariant_volume
#align measure_theory.pi.is_add_left_invariant_volume MeasureTheory.Pi.isAddLeftInvariant_volume
/-- We intentionally restrict this only to the nondependent function space, since type-class
inference cannot find an instance for `ι → ℝ` when this is stated for dependent function spaces. -/
@[to_additive "We intentionally restrict this only to the nondependent function space, since
type-class inference cannot find an instance for `ι → ℝ` when this is stated for dependent function
spaces."]
instance Pi.isInvInvariant_volume {α} [Group α] [MeasureSpace α] [SigmaFinite (volume : Measure α)]
[MeasurableInv α] [IsInvInvariant (volume : Measure α)] :
IsInvInvariant (volume : Measure (ι → α)) :=
pi.isInvInvariant _
#align measure_theory.pi.is_inv_invariant_volume MeasureTheory.Pi.isInvInvariant_volume
#align measure_theory.pi.is_neg_invariant_volume MeasureTheory.Pi.isNegInvariant_volume
/-!
### Measure preserving equivalences
In this section we prove that some measurable equivalences (e.g., between `Fin 1 → α` and `α` or
between `Fin 2 → α` and `α × α`) preserve measure or volume. These lemmas can be used to prove that
measures of corresponding sets (images or preimages) have equal measures and functions `f ∘ e` and
`f` have equal integrals, see lemmas in the `MeasureTheory.measurePreserving` prefix.
-/
section MeasurePreserving
variable {m : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)} (μ : ∀ i, Measure (α i)) [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)]
variable [Fintype ι']
theorem measurePreserving_piEquivPiSubtypeProd (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.piEquivPiSubtypeProd α p) (Measure.pi μ)
((Measure.pi fun i : Subtype p => μ i).prod (Measure.pi fun i => μ i)) := by
set e := (MeasurableEquiv.piEquivPiSubtypeProd α p).symm
refine MeasurePreserving.symm e ?_
refine ⟨e.measurable, (pi_eq fun s _ => ?_).symm⟩
have : e ⁻¹' pi univ s =
(pi univ fun i : { i // p i } => s i) ×ˢ pi univ fun i : { i // ¬p i } => s i :=
Equiv.preimage_piEquivPiSubtypeProd_symm_pi p s
rw [e.map_apply, this, prod_prod, pi_pi, pi_pi]
exact Fintype.prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype p fun i => μ i (s i)
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_piEquivPiSubtypeProd
theorem volume_preserving_piEquivPiSubtypeProd (α : ι → Type*)
[∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (α i))] (p : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] : MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.piEquivPiSubtypeProd α p) :=
measurePreserving_piEquivPiSubtypeProd (fun _ => volume) p
#align measure_theory.volume_preserving_pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod MeasureTheory.volume_preserving_piEquivPiSubtypeProd
theorem measurePreserving_piCongrLeft (f : ι' ≃ ι) :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.piCongrLeft α f)
(Measure.pi fun i' => μ (f i')) (Measure.pi μ) where
measurable := (MeasurableEquiv.piCongrLeft α f).measurable
map_eq := by
refine (pi_eq fun s _ => ?_).symm
rw [MeasurableEquiv.map_apply, MeasurableEquiv.coe_piCongrLeft f,
Equiv.piCongrLeft_preimage_univ_pi, pi_pi _ _, f.prod_comp (fun i => μ i (s i))]
theorem volume_measurePreserving_piCongrLeft (α : ι → Type*) (f : ι' ≃ ι)
[∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (α i))] :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.piCongrLeft α f) volume volume :=
measurePreserving_piCongrLeft (fun _ ↦ volume) f
theorem measurePreserving_sumPiEquivProdPi_symm {π : ι ⊕ ι' → Type*}
{m : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (π i)} (μ : ∀ i, Measure (π i)) [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.sumPiEquivProdPi π).symm
((Measure.pi fun i => μ (.inl i)).prod (Measure.pi fun i => μ (.inr i))) (Measure.pi μ) where
measurable := (MeasurableEquiv.sumPiEquivProdPi π).symm.measurable
map_eq := by
refine (pi_eq fun s _ => ?_).symm
simp_rw [MeasurableEquiv.map_apply, MeasurableEquiv.coe_sumPiEquivProdPi_symm,
Equiv.sumPiEquivProdPi_symm_preimage_univ_pi, Measure.prod_prod, Measure.pi_pi,
Fintype.prod_sum_type]
theorem volume_measurePreserving_sumPiEquivProdPi_symm (π : ι ⊕ ι' → Type*)
[∀ i, MeasureSpace (π i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (π i))] :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.sumPiEquivProdPi π).symm volume volume :=
measurePreserving_sumPiEquivProdPi_symm (fun _ ↦ volume)
theorem measurePreserving_sumPiEquivProdPi {π : ι ⊕ ι' → Type*} {_m : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (π i)}
(μ : ∀ i, Measure (π i)) [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.sumPiEquivProdPi π)
(Measure.pi μ) ((Measure.pi fun i => μ (.inl i)).prod (Measure.pi fun i => μ (.inr i))) :=
measurePreserving_sumPiEquivProdPi_symm μ |>.symm
theorem volume_measurePreserving_sumPiEquivProdPi (π : ι ⊕ ι' → Type*)
[∀ i, MeasureSpace (π i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (π i))] :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.sumPiEquivProdPi π) volume volume :=
measurePreserving_sumPiEquivProdPi (fun _ ↦ volume)
theorem measurePreserving_piFinSuccAbove {n : ℕ} {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type u}
{m : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)} (μ : ∀ i, Measure (α i)) [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)]
(i : Fin (n + 1)) :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.piFinSuccAbove α i) (Measure.pi μ)
((μ i).prod <| Measure.pi fun j => μ (i.succAbove j)) := by
set e := (MeasurableEquiv.piFinSuccAbove α i).symm
refine MeasurePreserving.symm e ?_
refine ⟨e.measurable, (pi_eq fun s _ => ?_).symm⟩
rw [e.map_apply, i.prod_univ_succAbove _, ← pi_pi, ← prod_prod]
congr 1 with ⟨x, f⟩
simp [e, i.forall_iff_succAbove]
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_pi_fin_succ_above_equiv MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_piFinSuccAbove
theorem volume_preserving_piFinSuccAbove {n : ℕ} (α : Fin (n + 1) → Type u)
[∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (volume : Measure (α i))] (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.piFinSuccAbove α i) :=
measurePreserving_piFinSuccAbove (fun _ => volume) i
#align measure_theory.volume_preserving_pi_fin_succ_above_equiv MeasureTheory.volume_preserving_piFinSuccAbove
theorem measurePreserving_piUnique {π : ι → Type*} [Unique ι] {m : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (π i)}
(μ : ∀ i, Measure (π i)) :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.piUnique π) (Measure.pi μ) (μ default) where
measurable := (MeasurableEquiv.piUnique π).measurable
map_eq := by
set e := MeasurableEquiv.piUnique π
have : (piPremeasure fun i => (μ i).toOuterMeasure) = Measure.map e.symm (μ default) := by
ext1 s
rw [piPremeasure, Fintype.prod_unique, e.symm.map_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure]
congr 1; exact e.toEquiv.image_eq_preimage s
simp_rw [Measure.pi, OuterMeasure.pi, this, ← coe_toOuterMeasure, boundedBy_eq_self,
toOuterMeasure_toMeasure, MeasurableEquiv.map_map_symm]
theorem volume_preserving_piUnique (π : ι → Type*) [Unique ι] [∀ i, MeasureSpace (π i)] :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.piUnique π) volume volume :=
measurePreserving_piUnique _
theorem measurePreserving_funUnique {β : Type u} {_m : MeasurableSpace β} (μ : Measure β)
(α : Type v) [Unique α] :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.funUnique α β) (Measure.pi fun _ : α => μ) μ :=
measurePreserving_piUnique _
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_fun_unique MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_funUnique
theorem volume_preserving_funUnique (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [Unique α] [MeasureSpace β] :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.funUnique α β) volume volume :=
measurePreserving_funUnique volume α
#align measure_theory.volume_preserving_fun_unique MeasureTheory.volume_preserving_funUnique
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Pi.lean | 871 | 877 | theorem measurePreserving_piFinTwo {α : Fin 2 → Type u} {m : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)}
(μ : ∀ i, Measure (α i)) [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.piFinTwo α) (Measure.pi μ) ((μ 0).prod (μ 1)) := by |
refine ⟨MeasurableEquiv.measurable _, (Measure.prod_eq fun s t _ _ => ?_).symm⟩
rw [MeasurableEquiv.map_apply, MeasurableEquiv.piFinTwo_apply, Fin.preimage_apply_01_prod,
Measure.pi_pi, Fin.prod_univ_two]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
#align_import measure_theory.measure.measure_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"343e80208d29d2d15f8050b929aa50fe4ce71b55"
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace
open scoped Classical symmDiff
open Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_is_measurably_generated MeasureTheory.ae_isMeasurablyGenerated
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
#align measure_theory.ae_uIoc_iff MeasureTheory.ae_uIoc_iff
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
#align measure_theory.measure_union MeasureTheory.measure_union
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
#align measure_theory.measure_union' MeasureTheory.measure_union'
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_inter_add_diff MeasureTheory.measure_inter_add_diff
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_add_inter MeasureTheory.measure_diff_add_inter
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure_union_add_inter MeasureTheory.measure_union_add_inter
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure_union_add_inter' MeasureTheory.measure_union_add_inter'
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union] using measure_union disjoint_sdiff_sdiff (ht.diff hs)
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_add_measure_compl MeasureTheory.measure_add_measure_compl
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion₀ MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion₀
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
#align measure_theory.measure_sUnion₀ MeasureTheory.measure_sUnion₀
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
#align measure_theory.measure_sUnion MeasureTheory.measure_sUnion
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_finset₀ MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_finset₀
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_finset MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_finset
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
#align measure_theory.tsum_meas_le_meas_Union_of_disjoint MeasureTheory.tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
#align measure_theory.tsum_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.tsum_measure_preimage_singleton
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
#align measure_theory.sum_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.sum_measure_preimage_singleton
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_null' MeasureTheory.measure_diff_null'
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) : μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union' disjoint_sdiff_right hs, union_diff_self]
#align measure_theory.measure_add_diff MeasureTheory.measure_add_diff
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : MeasurableSet t) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
Eq.symm <| ENNReal.sub_eq_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff' MeasureTheory.measure_diff'
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff MeasureTheory.measure_diff
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
#align measure_theory.le_measure_diff MeasureTheory.le_measure_diff
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := (WithTop.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩).symm
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add MeasureTheory.measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} :
μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_le_iff_le_add MeasureTheory.measure_diff_le_iff_le_add
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
#align measure_theory.measure_compl MeasureTheory.measure_compl
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE h₁) h₂ hsm ht
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge
theorem measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset [Countable β] {s : β → Set α} {t : β → Set α}
(hsub : ∀ b, s b ⊆ t b) (h_le : ∀ b, μ (t b) ≤ μ (s b)) : μ (⋃ b, s b) = μ (⋃ b, t b) := by
rcases Classical.em (∃ b, μ (t b) = ∞) with (⟨b, hb⟩ | htop)
· calc
μ (⋃ b, s b) = ∞ := top_unique (hb ▸ (h_le b).trans <| measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, t b) := Eq.symm <| top_unique <| hb ▸ measure_mono (subset_iUnion _ _)
push_neg at htop
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono (iUnion_mono hsub)) ?_
set M := toMeasurable μ
have H : ∀ b, (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b) : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] M (t b) := by
refine fun b => ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge inter_subset_left ?_ ?_ ?_
· calc
μ (M (t b)) = μ (t b) := measure_toMeasurable _
_ ≤ μ (s b) := h_le b
_ ≤ μ (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) :=
measure_mono <|
subset_inter ((hsub b).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
((subset_iUnion _ _).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· exact (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).inter (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
· rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact htop b
calc
μ (⋃ b, t b) ≤ μ (⋃ b, M (t b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun b => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion H).symm
_ ≤ μ (M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun b => inter_subset_right)
_ = μ (⋃ b, s b) := measure_toMeasurable _
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_congr_of_subset MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset
theorem measure_union_congr_of_subset {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hsμ : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₁)
(ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (htμ : μ t₂ ≤ μ t₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ t₁) = μ (s₂ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, union_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨ht, hs⟩) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨htμ, hsμ⟩)
#align measure_theory.measure_union_congr_of_subset MeasureTheory.measure_union_congr_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_toMeasurable [Countable β] (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b, s b) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (fun _b => subset_toMeasurable _ _) fun _b =>
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_toMeasurable
theorem measure_biUnion_toMeasurable {I : Set β} (hc : I.Countable) (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ I, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b ∈ I, s b) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_toMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable_union : μ (toMeasurable μ s ∪ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) (measure_toMeasurable _).le Subset.rfl
le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure_to_measurable_union MeasureTheory.measure_toMeasurable_union
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_toMeasurable : μ (s ∪ toMeasurable μ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset Subset.rfl le_rfl (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
#align measure_theory.measure_union_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_union_toMeasurable
theorem sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t i)) (H : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t) :
(∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_finset H h]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
#align measure_theory.sum_measure_le_measure_univ MeasureTheory.sum_measure_le_measure_univ
theorem tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(H : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
exact iSup_le fun s =>
sum_measure_le_measure_univ (fun i _hi => hs i) fun i _hi j _hj hij => H hij
#align measure_theory.tsum_measure_le_measure_univ MeasureTheory.tsum_measure_le_measure_univ
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) : ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs
intro i j hij
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i j hij)
#align measure_theory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure MeasureTheory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `Finset` and
`∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t i))
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ _h : i ≠ j, (t i ∩ t j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h
intro i hi j hj hij
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i hi j hj hij)
#align measure_theory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure MeasureTheory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `t` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
contrapose! h
calc
μ s + μ t = μ (s ∪ t) := (measure_union h ht).symm
_ ≤ μ u := measure_mono (union_subset h's h't)
#align measure_theory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add MeasureTheory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `s` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [add_comm] at h
rw [inter_comm]
exact nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add μ hs h't h's h
#align measure_theory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' MeasureTheory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add'
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a directed sequence of (not necessarily
-measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
cases nonempty_encodable ι
-- WLOG, `ι = ℕ`
generalize ht : Function.extend Encodable.encode s ⊥ = t
replace hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t := ht ▸ hd.extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective
suffices μ (⋃ n, t n) = ⨆ n, μ (t n) by
simp only [← ht, Function.apply_extend μ, ← iSup_eq_iUnion,
iSup_extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective, (· ∘ ·), Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_empty,
measure_empty] at this
exact this.trans (iSup_extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective _)
clear! ι
-- The `≥` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i => measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
-- Choose `T n ⊇ t n` of the same measure, put `Td n = disjointed T`
set T : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (t n)
set Td : ℕ → Set α := disjointed T
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (Td n) :=
MeasurableSet.disjointed fun n => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
calc
μ (⋃ n, t n) ≤ μ (⋃ n, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun i => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n, Td n) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed]
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (Td n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ⨆ I : Finset ℕ, ∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n) := ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := iSup_le fun I => by
rcases hd.finset_le I with ⟨N, hN⟩
calc
(∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n)) = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, Td n) :=
(measure_biUnion_finset ((disjoint_disjointed T).set_pairwise I) fun n _ => hm n).symm
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n ∈ I, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_mono fun n _hn => disjointed_subset _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, t n) := measure_biUnion_toMeasurable I.countable_toSet _
_ ≤ μ (t N) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_subset hN)
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := le_iSup (μ ∘ t) N
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_eq_supr MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_eq_iSup
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of
(not necessarily measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} : μ (⋃ i, f i) = ⨆ i, μ (Accumulate f i) := by
have hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) (Accumulate f) := by
intro i j
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j with ⟨k, rik, rjk⟩
exact ⟨k, biUnion_subset_biUnion_left fun l rli ↦ le_trans rli rik,
biUnion_subset_biUnion_left fun l rlj ↦ le_trans rlj rjk⟩
rw [← iUnion_accumulate]
exact measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hd
theorem measure_biUnion_eq_iSup {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable)
(hd : DirectedOn ((· ⊆ ·) on s) t) : μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) := by
haveI := ht.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hd.directed_val, ← iSup_subtype'']
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_eq_supr MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_eq_iSup
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) : μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ∀ t ⊆ s k, μ t ≠ ∞ := fun t ht => ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk (measure_mono ht)
rw [← ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (iInf_le _ k), ENNReal.sub_iInf, ←
ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (measure_mono (iInter_subset _ k)), ←
measure_diff (iInter_subset _ k) (MeasurableSet.iInter h) (this _ (iInter_subset _ k)),
diff_iInter, measure_iUnion_eq_iSup]
· congr 1
refine le_antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_) (iSup_mono fun i => ?_)
· rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩
use j
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (this _ hjk)]
gcongr
· rw [tsub_le_iff_right, ← measure_union, Set.union_comm]
· exact measure_mono (diff_subset_iff.1 Subset.rfl)
· apply disjoint_sdiff_left
· apply h i
· exact hd.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => diff_subset_diff_right
#align measure_theory.measure_Inter_eq_infi MeasureTheory.measure_iInter_eq_iInf
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of
measurable sets is the infimum of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, f i) = ⨅ i, μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j) := by
let s := fun i ↦ ⋂ j ≤ i, f j
have iInter_eq : ⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i, s i := by
ext x; simp [s]; constructor
· exact fun h _ j _ ↦ h j
· intro h i
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i i with ⟨j, rij, -⟩
exact h j i rij
have ms : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i) :=
fun i ↦ MeasurableSet.biInter (countable_univ.mono <| subset_univ _) fun i _ ↦ h i
have hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s := by
intro i j
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j with ⟨k, rik, rjk⟩
exact ⟨k, biInter_subset_biInter_left fun j rji ↦ le_trans rji rik,
biInter_subset_biInter_left fun i rij ↦ le_trans rij rjk⟩
have hfin' : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞ := by
rcases hfin with ⟨i, hi⟩
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i i with ⟨j, rij, -⟩
exact ⟨j, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hi <| measure_mono <| biInter_subset_of_mem rij⟩
exact iInter_eq ▸ measure_iInter_eq_iInf ms hd hfin'
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of (not necessarily
measurable) sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] [Countable ι]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Monotone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) := by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hm.directed_le]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_Union MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_iUnion
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [Countable ι]
[Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {f : ι → Set α} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup']
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun i j hij ↦ by gcongr
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter [Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (s n)) (hm : Antitone s) (hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) := by
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf hs hm.directed_ge hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_Inter MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_iInter
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of measurable
sets such that one has finite measure is the limit of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [Countable ι]
[Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {f : ι → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (⋂ j ∈ {j | j ≤ i}, f j)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ i, f i))) := by
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf' hm hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf
fun i j hij ↦ measure_mono <| biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki ↦ le_trans hki hij
/-- The measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets indexed by a linear order with first countable topology is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_biInter_gt {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [DenselyOrdered ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι] {s : ι → Set α}
{a : ι} (hs : ∀ r > a, MeasurableSet (s r)) (hm : ∀ i j, a < i → i ≤ j → s i ⊆ s j)
(hf : ∃ r > a, μ (s r) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) (𝓝 (μ (⋂ r > a, s r))) := by
refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun l hl => ?_, fun L hL => ?_⟩
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin (s := Ioi a)] with r hr using hl.trans_le
(measure_mono (biInter_subset_of_mem hr))
obtain ⟨u, u_anti, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ι, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, a < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) := by
rcases hf with ⟨r, ar, _⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto' ar with ⟨w, w_anti, w_mem, w_lim⟩
exact ⟨w, w_anti, fun n => (w_mem n).1, w_lim⟩
have A : Tendsto (μ ∘ s ∘ u) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s (u n)))) := by
refine tendsto_measure_iInter (fun n => hs _ (u_pos n)) ?_ ?_
· intro m n hmn
exact hm _ _ (u_pos n) (u_anti.antitone hmn)
· rcases hf with ⟨r, rpos, hr⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, u n < r := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 r rpos).exists
refine ⟨n, ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hr.lt_top)⟩
exact measure_mono (hm _ _ (u_pos n) hn.le)
have B : ⋂ n, s (u n) = ⋂ r > a, s r := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· simp only [subset_iInter_iff, gt_iff_lt]
intro r rpos
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < r := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 _ rpos).exists
exact Subset.trans (iInter_subset _ n) (hm (u n) r (u_pos n) hn.le)
· simp only [subset_iInter_iff, gt_iff_lt]
intro n
apply biInter_subset_of_mem
exact u_pos n
rw [B] at A
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, μ (s (u n)) < L := ((tendsto_order.1 A).2 _ hL).exists
have : Ioc a (u n) ∈ 𝓝[>] a := Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, u_pos n⟩
filter_upwards [this] with r hr using lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (hm _ _ hr.1 hr.2)) hn
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_bInter_gt MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_biInter_gt
/-- One direction of the **Borel-Cantelli lemma** (sometimes called the "*first* Borel-Cantelli
lemma"): if (sᵢ) is a sequence of sets such that `∑ μ sᵢ` is finite, then the limit superior of the
`sᵢ` is a null set.
Note: for the *second* Borel-Cantelli lemma (applying to independent sets in a probability space),
see `ProbabilityTheory.measure_limsup_eq_one`. -/
theorem measure_limsup_eq_zero {s : ℕ → Set α} (hs : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≠ ∞) :
μ (limsup s atTop) = 0 := by
-- First we replace the sequence `sₙ` with a sequence of measurable sets `tₙ ⊇ sₙ` of the same
-- measure.
set t : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (s n)
have ht : (∑' i, μ (t i)) ≠ ∞ := by simpa only [t, measure_toMeasurable] using hs
suffices μ (limsup t atTop) = 0 by
have A : s ≤ t := fun n => subset_toMeasurable μ (s n)
-- TODO default args fail
exact measure_mono_null (limsup_le_limsup (eventually_of_forall (Pi.le_def.mp A))) this
-- Next we unfold `limsup` for sets and replace equality with an inequality
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat', Set.iInf_eq_iInter, Set.iSup_eq_iUnion, ←
nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
-- Finally, we estimate `μ (⋃ i, t (i + n))` by `∑ i', μ (t (i + n))`
refine
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto'
(tendsto_measure_iInter
(fun i => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun b => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) ?_
⟨0, ne_top_of_le_ne_top ht (measure_iUnion_le t)⟩)
(ENNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add (μ ∘ t) ht) fun n => measure_iUnion_le _
intro n m hnm x
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion]
exact fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i + (m - n), by simpa only [add_assoc, tsub_add_cancel_of_le hnm] using hi⟩
#align measure_theory.measure_limsup_eq_zero MeasureTheory.measure_limsup_eq_zero
theorem measure_liminf_eq_zero {s : ℕ → Set α} (h : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≠ ∞) :
μ (liminf s atTop) = 0 := by
rw [← le_zero_iff]
have : liminf s atTop ≤ limsup s atTop := liminf_le_limsup
exact (μ.mono this).trans (by simp [measure_limsup_eq_zero h])
#align measure_theory.measure_liminf_eq_zero MeasureTheory.measure_liminf_eq_zero
-- Need to specify `α := Set α` below because of diamond; see #19041
theorem limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq (s : ℕ → Set α) {t : Set α}
(h : ∀ n, s n =ᵐ[μ] t) : limsup (α := Set α) s atTop =ᵐ[μ] t := by
simp_rw [ae_eq_set] at h ⊢
constructor
· rw [atTop.limsup_sdiff s t]
apply measure_limsup_eq_zero
simp [h]
· rw [atTop.sdiff_limsup s t]
apply measure_liminf_eq_zero
simp [h]
#align measure_theory.limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq MeasureTheory.limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq
-- Need to specify `α := Set α` above because of diamond; see #19041
theorem liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq (s : ℕ → Set α) {t : Set α}
(h : ∀ n, s n =ᵐ[μ] t) : liminf (α := Set α) s atTop =ᵐ[μ] t := by
simp_rw [ae_eq_set] at h ⊢
constructor
· rw [atTop.liminf_sdiff s t]
apply measure_liminf_eq_zero
simp [h]
· rw [atTop.sdiff_liminf s t]
apply measure_limsup_eq_zero
simp [h]
#align measure_theory.liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq MeasureTheory.liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq
theorem measure_if {x : β} {t : Set β} {s : Set α} :
μ (if x ∈ t then s else ∅) = indicator t (fun _ => μ s) x := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align measure_theory.measure_if MeasureTheory.measure_if
end
section OuterMeasure
variable [ms : MeasurableSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-- Obtain a measure by giving an outer measure where all sets in the σ-algebra are
Carathéodory measurable. -/
def OuterMeasure.toMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => m s) m.empty fun _f hf hd =>
m.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory (fun i => h _ (hf i)) hd
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.to_measure MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure
theorem le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory (μ : Measure α) : ms ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory :=
fun _s hs _t => (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
#align measure_theory.le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory MeasureTheory.le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_toOuterMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.toMeasure h).toOuterMeasure = m.trim :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.to_measure_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.toMeasure_toOuterMeasure
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : m.toMeasure h s = m s :=
m.trim_eq hs
#align measure_theory.to_measure_apply MeasureTheory.toMeasure_apply
theorem le_toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) (s : Set α) :
m s ≤ m.toMeasure h s :=
m.le_trim s
#align measure_theory.le_to_measure_apply MeasureTheory.le_toMeasure_apply
theorem toMeasure_apply₀ (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (m.toMeasure h)) : m.toMeasure h s = m s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, hts, htm, heq⟩
calc
m.toMeasure h s = m.toMeasure h t := measure_congr heq.symm
_ = m t := toMeasure_apply m h htm
_ ≤ m s := m.mono hts
#align measure_theory.to_measure_apply₀ MeasureTheory.toMeasure_apply₀
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_toMeasure {μ : Measure α} :
μ.toOuterMeasure.toMeasure (le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
Measure.ext fun _s => μ.toOuterMeasure.trim_eq
#align measure_theory.to_outer_measure_to_measure MeasureTheory.toOuterMeasure_toMeasure
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_measure (μ : Measure α) : OuterMeasure.boundedBy μ = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
μ.toOuterMeasure.boundedBy_eq_self
#align measure_theory.bounded_by_measure MeasureTheory.boundedBy_measure
end OuterMeasure
section
/- Porting note: These variables are wrapped by an anonymous section because they interrupt
synthesizing instances in `MeasureSpace` section. -/
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-- If `u` is a superset of `t` with the same (finite) measure (both sets possibly non-measurable),
then for any measurable set `s` one also has `μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq {s t u : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : μ t = μ u)
(htu : t ⊆ u) (ht_ne_top : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s) := by
rw [h] at ht_ne_top
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr) ?_
have A : μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) :=
calc
μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) = μ u := measure_inter_add_diff _ hs
_ = μ t := h.symm
_ = μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t \ s) := (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) := by gcongr
have B : μ (u \ s) ≠ ∞ := (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono diff_subset) ht_ne_top.lt_top).ne
exact ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right B A
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq
/-- The measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` of `t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`.
Here, we require that the measure of `t` is finite. The conclusion holds without this assumption
when the measure is s-finite (for example when it is σ-finite),
see `measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) :=
(measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs (measure_toMeasurable t).symm (subset_toMeasurable μ t)
ht).symm
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_inter MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_inter
/-! ### The `ℝ≥0∞`-module of measures -/
instance instZero [MeasurableSpace α] : Zero (Measure α) :=
⟨{ toOuterMeasure := 0
m_iUnion := fun _f _hf _hd => tsum_zero.symm
trim_le := OuterMeasure.trim_zero.le }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.instZero
@[simp]
theorem zero_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : (0 : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.zero_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.zero_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : ⇑(0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_zero
@[nontriviality]
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = 0 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty]
instance instSubsingleton [IsEmpty α] {m : MeasurableSpace α} : Subsingleton (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ ν => by ext1 s _; rw [apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty, apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty]⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.subsingleton MeasureTheory.Measure.instSubsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim μ 0
#align measure_theory.measure.eq_zero_of_is_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.eq_zero_of_isEmpty
instance instInhabited [MeasurableSpace α] : Inhabited (Measure α) :=
⟨0⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.inhabited MeasureTheory.Measure.instInhabited
instance instAdd [MeasurableSpace α] : Add (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ₁ μ₂ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd =>
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, (μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i)) by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_add, measure_iUnion hd hs, measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_add MeasureTheory.Measure.instAdd
@[simp]
theorem add_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).toOuterMeasure = μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.add_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) : ⇑(μ₁ + μ₂) = μ₁ + μ₂ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_add MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_add
theorem add_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.add_apply
section SMul
variable [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
variable [SMul R' ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul [MeasurableSpace α] : SMul R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun c μ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := c • μ.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.smul_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure, ENNReal.tsum_const_smul,
measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_smul, μ.trimmed] }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.instSMul
@[simp]
theorem smul_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) :
(c • μ).toOuterMeasure = c • μ.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.smul_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) : ⇑(c • μ) = c • ⇑μ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_smul
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.smul_apply
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
SMulCommClass R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_comm_class MeasureTheory.Measure.instSMulCommClass
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.is_scalar_tower MeasureTheory.Measure.instIsScalarTower
instance instIsCentralScalar [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ ℝ≥0∞] [IsCentralScalar R ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsCentralScalar R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.is_central_scalar MeasureTheory.Measure.instIsCentralScalar
end SMul
instance instNoZeroSMulDivisors [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (Measure α) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h := by simpa [Ne, ext_iff', forall_or_left] using h
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[MeasurableSpace α] : MulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.mulAction _ toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.mul_action MeasureTheory.Measure.instMulAction
instance instAddCommMonoid [MeasurableSpace α] : AddCommMonoid (Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid toOuterMeasure zero_toOuterMeasure add_toOuterMeasure
fun _ _ => smul_toOuterMeasure _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.add_comm_monoid MeasureTheory.Measure.instAddCommMonoid
/-- Coercion to function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Measure α →+ Set α → ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_add_hom MeasureTheory.Measure.coeAddHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(μ i) := map_sum coeAddHom μ I
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_finset_sum MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_finset_sum
theorem finset_sum_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) s = ∑ i ∈ I, μ i s := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
#align measure_theory.measure.finset_sum_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.finset_sum_apply
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[MeasurableSpace α] : DistribMulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.distrib_mul_action MeasureTheory.Measure.instDistribMulAction
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
Module R (Measure α) :=
Injective.module R ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.module MeasureTheory.Measure.instModule
@[simp]
theorem coe_nnreal_smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c * μ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_nnreal_smul_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_nnreal_smul_apply
@[simp]
theorem nnreal_smul_coe_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
c • μ s = c * μ s := by
rfl
theorem ae_smul_measure_iff {p : α → Prop} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, smul_apply, or_iff_right_iff_imp, mul_eq_zero]
simp only [IsEmpty.forall_iff, hc]
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_smul_measure_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_smul_measure_iff
theorem measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : μ s = μ t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono h') ?_
have : μ t + ν t ≤ μ s + ν t :=
calc
μ t + ν t = μ s + ν s := h''.symm
_ ≤ μ s + ν t := by gcongr
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right _ this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (le_add_left le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq
theorem measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : ν s = ν t := by
rw [add_comm] at h'' h
exact measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq h h' h''
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 991 | 999 | theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : μ (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by |
refine (measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _) ?_).symm
· refine
measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable t).symm
rwa [measure_toMeasurable t]
· simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at ht
exact ht.1
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Apurva Nakade. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Apurva Nakade
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Birthday
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Surreal.Basic
#align_import set_theory.surreal.dyadic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
/-!
# Dyadic numbers
Dyadic numbers are obtained by localizing ℤ away from 2. They are the initial object in the category
of rings with no 2-torsion.
## Dyadic surreal numbers
We construct dyadic surreal numbers using the canonical map from ℤ[2 ^ {-1}] to surreals.
As we currently do not have a ring structure on `Surreal` we construct this map explicitly. Once we
have the ring structure, this map can be constructed directly by sending `2 ^ {-1}` to `half`.
## Embeddings
The above construction gives us an abelian group embedding of ℤ into `Surreal`. The goal is to
extend this to an embedding of dyadic rationals into `Surreal` and use Cauchy sequences of dyadic
rational numbers to construct an ordered field embedding of ℝ into `Surreal`.
-/
universe u
namespace SetTheory
namespace PGame
/-- For a natural number `n`, the pre-game `powHalf (n + 1)` is recursively defined as
`{0 | powHalf n}`. These are the explicit expressions of powers of `1 / 2`. By definition, we have
`powHalf 0 = 1` and `powHalf 1 ≈ 1 / 2` and we prove later on that
`powHalf (n + 1) + powHalf (n + 1) ≈ powHalf n`. -/
def powHalf : ℕ → PGame
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => ⟨PUnit, PUnit, 0, fun _ => powHalf n⟩
#align pgame.pow_half SetTheory.PGame.powHalf
@[simp]
theorem powHalf_zero : powHalf 0 = 1 :=
rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_zero SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_zero
theorem powHalf_leftMoves (n) : (powHalf n).LeftMoves = PUnit := by cases n <;> rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_leftMoves
theorem powHalf_zero_rightMoves : (powHalf 0).RightMoves = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_zero_rightMoves
theorem powHalf_succ_rightMoves (n) : (powHalf (n + 1)).RightMoves = PUnit :=
rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_succ_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_succ_rightMoves
@[simp]
theorem powHalf_moveLeft (n i) : (powHalf n).moveLeft i = 0 := by cases n <;> cases i <;> rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_move_left SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem powHalf_succ_moveRight (n i) : (powHalf (n + 1)).moveRight i = powHalf n :=
rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_succ_move_right SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_succ_moveRight
instance uniquePowHalfLeftMoves (n) : Unique (powHalf n).LeftMoves := by
cases n <;> exact PUnit.unique
#align pgame.unique_pow_half_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.uniquePowHalfLeftMoves
instance isEmpty_powHalf_zero_rightMoves : IsEmpty (powHalf 0).RightMoves :=
inferInstanceAs (IsEmpty PEmpty)
#align pgame.is_empty_pow_half_zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_powHalf_zero_rightMoves
instance uniquePowHalfSuccRightMoves (n) : Unique (powHalf (n + 1)).RightMoves :=
PUnit.unique
#align pgame.unique_pow_half_succ_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.uniquePowHalfSuccRightMoves
@[simp]
theorem birthday_half : birthday (powHalf 1) = 2 := by
rw [birthday_def]; simp
#align pgame.birthday_half SetTheory.PGame.birthday_half
/-- For all natural numbers `n`, the pre-games `powHalf n` are numeric. -/
theorem numeric_powHalf (n) : (powHalf n).Numeric := by
induction' n with n hn
· exact numeric_one
· constructor
· simpa using hn.moveLeft_lt default
· exact ⟨fun _ => numeric_zero, fun _ => hn⟩
#align pgame.numeric_pow_half SetTheory.PGame.numeric_powHalf
theorem powHalf_succ_lt_powHalf (n : ℕ) : powHalf (n + 1) < powHalf n :=
(numeric_powHalf (n + 1)).lt_moveRight default
#align pgame.pow_half_succ_lt_pow_half SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_succ_lt_powHalf
theorem powHalf_succ_le_powHalf (n : ℕ) : powHalf (n + 1) ≤ powHalf n :=
(powHalf_succ_lt_powHalf n).le
#align pgame.pow_half_succ_le_pow_half SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_succ_le_powHalf
theorem powHalf_le_one (n : ℕ) : powHalf n ≤ 1 := by
induction' n with n hn
· exact le_rfl
· exact (powHalf_succ_le_powHalf n).trans hn
#align pgame.pow_half_le_one SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_le_one
theorem powHalf_succ_lt_one (n : ℕ) : powHalf (n + 1) < 1 :=
(powHalf_succ_lt_powHalf n).trans_le <| powHalf_le_one n
#align pgame.pow_half_succ_lt_one SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_succ_lt_one
theorem powHalf_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < powHalf n := by
rw [← lf_iff_lt numeric_zero (numeric_powHalf n), zero_lf_le]; simp
#align pgame.pow_half_pos SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_pos
theorem zero_le_powHalf (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ powHalf n :=
(powHalf_pos n).le
#align pgame.zero_le_pow_half SetTheory.PGame.zero_le_powHalf
theorem add_powHalf_succ_self_eq_powHalf (n) : powHalf (n + 1) + powHalf (n + 1) ≈ powHalf n := by
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n hn
constructor <;> rw [le_iff_forall_lf] <;> constructor
· rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> apply lf_of_lt
· calc
0 + powHalf n.succ ≈ powHalf n.succ := zero_add_equiv _
_ < powHalf n := powHalf_succ_lt_powHalf n
· calc
powHalf n.succ + 0 ≈ powHalf n.succ := add_zero_equiv _
_ < powHalf n := powHalf_succ_lt_powHalf n
· cases' n with n
· rintro ⟨⟩
rintro ⟨⟩
apply lf_of_moveRight_le
swap
· exact Sum.inl default
calc
powHalf n.succ + powHalf (n.succ + 1) ≤ powHalf n.succ + powHalf n.succ :=
add_le_add_left (powHalf_succ_le_powHalf _) _
_ ≈ powHalf n := hn _ (Nat.lt_succ_self n)
· simp only [powHalf_moveLeft, forall_const]
apply lf_of_lt
calc
0 ≈ 0 + 0 := Equiv.symm (add_zero_equiv 0)
_ ≤ powHalf n.succ + 0 := add_le_add_right (zero_le_powHalf _) _
_ < powHalf n.succ + powHalf n.succ := add_lt_add_left (powHalf_pos _) _
· rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> apply lf_of_lt
· calc
powHalf n ≈ powHalf n + 0 := Equiv.symm (add_zero_equiv _)
_ < powHalf n + powHalf n.succ := add_lt_add_left (powHalf_pos _) _
· calc
powHalf n ≈ 0 + powHalf n := Equiv.symm (zero_add_equiv _)
_ < powHalf n.succ + powHalf n := add_lt_add_right (powHalf_pos _) _
#align pgame.add_pow_half_succ_self_eq_pow_half SetTheory.PGame.add_powHalf_succ_self_eq_powHalf
theorem half_add_half_equiv_one : powHalf 1 + powHalf 1 ≈ 1 :=
add_powHalf_succ_self_eq_powHalf 0
#align pgame.half_add_half_equiv_one SetTheory.PGame.half_add_half_equiv_one
end PGame
end SetTheory
namespace Surreal
open SetTheory PGame
/-- Powers of the surreal number `half`. -/
def powHalf (n : ℕ) : Surreal :=
⟦⟨PGame.powHalf n, PGame.numeric_powHalf n⟩⟧
#align surreal.pow_half Surreal.powHalf
@[simp]
theorem powHalf_zero : powHalf 0 = 1 :=
rfl
#align surreal.pow_half_zero Surreal.powHalf_zero
@[simp]
theorem double_powHalf_succ_eq_powHalf (n : ℕ) : 2 • powHalf n.succ = powHalf n := by
rw [two_nsmul]; exact Quotient.sound (PGame.add_powHalf_succ_self_eq_powHalf n)
#align surreal.double_pow_half_succ_eq_pow_half Surreal.double_powHalf_succ_eq_powHalf
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_pow_two_powHalf (n : ℕ) : 2 ^ n • powHalf n = 1 := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, pow_zero, powHalf_zero, one_smul]
· rw [← hn, ← double_powHalf_succ_eq_powHalf n, smul_smul (2 ^ n) 2 (powHalf n.succ), mul_comm,
pow_succ']
#align surreal.nsmul_pow_two_pow_half Surreal.nsmul_pow_two_powHalf
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_pow_two_powHalf' (n k : ℕ) : 2 ^ n • powHalf (n + k) = powHalf k := by
induction' k with k hk
· simp only [add_zero, Surreal.nsmul_pow_two_powHalf, Nat.zero_eq, eq_self_iff_true,
Surreal.powHalf_zero]
· rw [← double_powHalf_succ_eq_powHalf (n + k), ← double_powHalf_succ_eq_powHalf k,
smul_algebra_smul_comm] at hk
rwa [← zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff' two_ne_zero]
#align surreal.nsmul_pow_two_pow_half' Surreal.nsmul_pow_two_powHalf'
theorem zsmul_pow_two_powHalf (m : ℤ) (n k : ℕ) :
(m * 2 ^ n) • powHalf (n + k) = m • powHalf k := by
rw [mul_zsmul]
congr
norm_cast
exact nsmul_pow_two_powHalf' n k
#align surreal.zsmul_pow_two_pow_half Surreal.zsmul_pow_two_powHalf
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Surreal/Dyadic.lean | 212 | 223 | theorem dyadic_aux {m₁ m₂ : ℤ} {y₁ y₂ : ℕ} (h₂ : m₁ * 2 ^ y₁ = m₂ * 2 ^ y₂) :
m₁ • powHalf y₂ = m₂ • powHalf y₁ := by |
revert m₁ m₂
wlog h : y₁ ≤ y₂
· intro m₁ m₂ aux; exact (this (le_of_not_le h) aux.symm).symm
intro m₁ m₂ h₂
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := le_iff_exists_add.mp h
rw [add_comm, pow_add, ← mul_assoc, mul_eq_mul_right_iff] at h₂
cases' h₂ with h₂ h₂
· rw [h₂, add_comm, zsmul_pow_two_powHalf m₂ c y₁]
· have := Nat.one_le_pow y₁ 2 Nat.succ_pos'
norm_cast at h₂; omega
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetToL1
#align_import measure_theory.integral.bochner from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
/-!
# Bochner integral
The Bochner integral extends the definition of the Lebesgue integral to functions that map from a
measure space into a Banach space (complete normed vector space). It is constructed here by
extending the integral on simple functions.
## Main definitions
The Bochner integral is defined through the extension process described in the file `SetToL1`,
which follows these steps:
1. Define the integral of the indicator of a set. This is `weightedSMul μ s x = (μ s).toReal * x`.
`weightedSMul μ` is shown to be linear in the value `x` and `DominatedFinMeasAdditive`
(defined in the file `SetToL1`) with respect to the set `s`.
2. Define the integral on simple functions of the type `SimpleFunc α E` (notation : `α →ₛ E`)
where `E` is a real normed space. (See `SimpleFunc.integral` for details.)
3. Transfer this definition to define the integral on `L1.simpleFunc α E` (notation :
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E`), see `L1.simpleFunc.integral`. Show that this integral is a continuous linear
map from `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` to `E`.
4. Define the Bochner integral on L1 functions by extending the integral on integrable simple
functions `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` using `ContinuousLinearMap.extend` and the fact that the embedding of
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E` into `α →₁[μ] E` is dense.
5. Define the Bochner integral on functions as the Bochner integral of its equivalence class in L1
space, if it is in L1, and 0 otherwise.
The result of that construction is `∫ a, f a ∂μ`, which is definitionally equal to
`setToFun (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f`. Some basic properties of the integral
(like linearity) are particular cases of the properties of `setToFun` (which are described in the
file `SetToL1`).
## Main statements
1. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → E`, where `α` is a measure
space and `E` is a real normed space.
* `integral_zero` : `∫ 0 ∂μ = 0`
* `integral_add` : `∫ x, f x + g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f ∂μ + ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_neg` : `∫ x, - f x ∂μ = - ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_sub` : `∫ x, f x - g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ - ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_smul` : `∫ x, r • f x ∂μ = r • ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_congr_ae` : `f =ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `norm_integral_le_integral_norm` : `‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ`
2. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → ℝ`, where `α` is a measure
space.
* `integral_nonneg_of_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos_of_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonneg` : `0 ≤ f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos` : `f ≤ 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
3. Propositions connecting the Bochner integral with the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions,
which is called `lintegral` and has the notation `∫⁻`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part` :
`∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f⁺ x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f⁻ x ∂μ`,
where `f⁺` is the positive part of `f` and `f⁻` is the negative part of `f`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`
4. (In the file `DominatedConvergence`)
`tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence` : the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
5. (In the file `SetIntegral`) integration commutes with continuous linear maps.
* `ContinuousLinearMap.integral_comp_comm`
* `LinearIsometry.integral_comp_comm`
## Notes
Some tips on how to prove a proposition if the API for the Bochner integral is not enough so that
you need to unfold the definition of the Bochner integral and go back to simple functions.
One method is to use the theorem `Integrable.induction` in the file `SimpleFuncDenseLp` (or one
of the related results, like `Lp.induction` for functions in `Lp`), which allows you to prove
something for an arbitrary integrable function.
Another method is using the following steps.
See `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part` for a complicated example, which proves
that `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, with the first integral sign being the Bochner integral of a real-valued
function `f : α → ℝ`, and second and third integral sign being the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued
functions (called `lintegral`). The proof of `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part`
is scattered in sections with the name `posPart`.
Here are the usual steps of proving that a property `p`, say `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, holds for all
functions :
1. First go to the `L¹` space.
For example, if you see `ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal <| ‖f a‖)`, that is the norm of
`f` in `L¹` space. Rewrite using `L1.norm_of_fun_eq_lintegral_norm`.
2. Show that the set `{f ∈ L¹ | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}` is closed in `L¹` using `isClosed_eq`.
3. Show that the property holds for all simple functions `s` in `L¹` space.
Typically, you need to convert various notions to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart, using lemmas
like `L1.integral_coe_eq_integral`.
4. Since simple functions are dense in `L¹`,
```
univ = closure {s simple}
= closure {s simple | ∫ s = ∫⁻ s⁺ - ∫⁻ s⁻} : the property holds for all simple functions
⊆ closure {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}
= {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻} : closure of a closed set is itself
```
Use `isClosed_property` or `DenseRange.induction_on` for this argument.
## Notations
* `α →ₛ E` : simple functions (defined in `MeasureTheory/Integration`)
* `α →₁[μ] E` : functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable functions (defined in
`MeasureTheory/LpSpace`)
* `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` : simple functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable simple
functions (defined in `MeasureTheory/SimpleFuncDense`)
* `∫ a, f a ∂μ` : integral of `f` with respect to a measure `μ`
* `∫ a, f a` : integral of `f` with respect to `volume`, the default measure on the ambient type
We also define notations for integral on a set, which are described in the file
`MeasureTheory/SetIntegral`.
Note : `ₛ` is typed using `\_s`. Sometimes it shows as a box if the font is missing.
## Tags
Bochner integral, simple function, function space, Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Differentiable
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F 𝕜 : Type*}
section WeightedSMul
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- Given a set `s`, return the continuous linear map `fun x => (μ s).toReal • x`. The extension
of that set function through `setToL1` gives the Bochner integral of L1 functions. -/
def weightedSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : F →L[ℝ] F :=
(μ s).toReal • ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul MeasureTheory.weightedSMul
theorem weightedSMul_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) (x : F) :
weightedSMul μ s x = (μ s).toReal • x := by simp [weightedSMul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_apply MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_apply
@[simp]
theorem weightedSMul_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} :
weightedSMul (0 : Measure α) = (0 : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F) := by ext1; simp [weightedSMul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_zero_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem weightedSMul_empty {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) :
weightedSMul μ ∅ = (0 : F →L[ℝ] F) := by ext1 x; rw [weightedSMul_apply]; simp
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_empty MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_empty
theorem weightedSMul_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) {s : Set α}
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hνs : ν s ≠ ∞) :
(weightedSMul (μ + ν) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul ν s := by
ext1 x
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, weightedSMul_apply]
push_cast
rw [Pi.add_apply, ENNReal.toReal_add hμs hνs, add_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_add_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_add_measure
theorem weightedSMul_smul_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} :
(weightedSMul (c • μ) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = c.toReal • weightedSMul μ s := by
ext1 x
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, weightedSMul_apply]
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, toReal_mul, smul_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_smul_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_smul_measure
theorem weightedSMul_congr (s t : Set α) (hst : μ s = μ t) :
(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ t := by
ext1 x; simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply]; congr 2
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_congr MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_congr
theorem weightedSMul_null {s : Set α} (h_zero : μ s = 0) : (weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = 0 := by
ext1 x; rw [weightedSMul_apply, h_zero]; simp
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_null MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_null
theorem weightedSMul_union' (s t : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞)
(ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weightedSMul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul μ t := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [add_apply, weightedSMul_apply,
measure_union (Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr h_inter) ht,
ENNReal.toReal_add hs_finite ht_finite, add_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_union' MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_union'
@[nolint unusedArguments]
theorem weightedSMul_union (s t : Set α) (_hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weightedSMul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul μ t :=
weightedSMul_union' s t ht hs_finite ht_finite h_inter
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_union MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_union
theorem weightedSMul_smul [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] (c : 𝕜)
(s : Set α) (x : F) : weightedSMul μ s (c • x) = c • weightedSMul μ s x := by
simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply, smul_comm]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_smul MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_smul
theorem norm_weightedSMul_le (s : Set α) : ‖(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)‖ ≤ (μ s).toReal :=
calc
‖(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)‖ = ‖(μ s).toReal‖ * ‖ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F‖ :=
norm_smul (μ s).toReal (ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F)
_ ≤ ‖(μ s).toReal‖ :=
((mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left norm_id_le (norm_nonneg _)).trans (mul_one _).le)
_ = abs (μ s).toReal := Real.norm_eq_abs _
_ = (μ s).toReal := abs_eq_self.mpr ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align measure_theory.norm_weighted_smul_le MeasureTheory.norm_weightedSMul_le
theorem dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) :
DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (weightedSMul μ : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F) 1 :=
⟨weightedSMul_union, fun s _ _ => (norm_weightedSMul_le s).trans (one_mul _).symm.le⟩
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul MeasureTheory.dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul
theorem weightedSMul_nonneg (s : Set α) (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ weightedSMul μ s x := by
simp only [weightedSMul, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, coe_smul', _root_.id, coe_id', Pi.smul_apply]
exact mul_nonneg toReal_nonneg hx
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_nonneg MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_nonneg
end WeightedSMul
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
section PosPart
variable [LinearOrder E] [Zero E] [MeasurableSpace α]
/-- Positive part of a simple function. -/
def posPart (f : α →ₛ E) : α →ₛ E :=
f.map fun b => max b 0
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart
/-- Negative part of a simple function. -/
def negPart [Neg E] (f : α →ₛ E) : α →ₛ E :=
posPart (-f)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.neg_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart
theorem posPart_map_norm (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : (posPart f).map norm = posPart f := by
ext; rw [map_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg]; exact le_max_right _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part_map_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart_map_norm
theorem negPart_map_norm (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : (negPart f).map norm = negPart f := by
rw [negPart]; exact posPart_map_norm _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.neg_part_map_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart_map_norm
theorem posPart_sub_negPart (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : f.posPart - f.negPart = f := by
simp only [posPart, negPart]
ext a
rw [coe_sub]
exact max_zero_sub_eq_self (f a)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part_sub_neg_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart_sub_negPart
end PosPart
section Integral
/-!
### The Bochner integral of simple functions
Define the Bochner integral of simple functions of the type `α →ₛ β` where `β` is a normed group,
and prove basic property of this integral.
-/
open Finset
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {G F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : Measure α}
/-- Bochner integral of simple functions whose codomain is a real `NormedSpace`.
This is equal to `∑ x ∈ f.range, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x` (see `integral_eq`). -/
def integral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) : F :=
f.setToSimpleFunc (weightedSMul μ)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral
theorem integral_def {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) :
f.integral μ = f.setToSimpleFunc (weightedSMul μ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_def MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_def
theorem integral_eq {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
simp [integral, setToSimpleFunc, weightedSMul_apply]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_sum_filter [DecidablePred fun x : F => x ≠ 0] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(f : α →ₛ F) (μ : Measure α) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
rw [integral_def, setToSimpleFunc_eq_sum_filter]; simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply]; congr
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_sum_filter MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_filter
/-- The Bochner integral is equal to a sum over any set that includes `f.range` (except `0`). -/
theorem integral_eq_sum_of_subset [DecidablePred fun x : F => x ≠ 0] {f : α →ₛ F} {s : Finset F}
(hs : (f.range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0) ⊆ s) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ s, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
rw [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_filter, Finset.sum_subset hs]
rintro x - hx; rw [Finset.mem_filter, not_and_or, Ne, Classical.not_not] at hx
-- Porting note: reordered for clarity
rcases hx.symm with (rfl | hx)
· simp
rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range] at hx
-- Porting note: added
simp only [Set.mem_range, not_exists] at hx
rw [preimage_eq_empty] <;> simp [Set.disjoint_singleton_left, hx]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_sum_of_subset MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem integral_const {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (y : F) :
(const α y).integral μ = (μ univ).toReal • y := by
classical
calc
(const α y).integral μ = ∑ z ∈ {y}, (μ (const α y ⁻¹' {z})).toReal • z :=
integral_eq_sum_of_subset <| (filter_subset _ _).trans (range_const_subset _ _)
_ = (μ univ).toReal • y := by simp [Set.preimage] -- Porting note: added `Set.preimage`
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_const MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_const
@[simp]
theorem integral_piecewise_zero {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ F) (μ : Measure α) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : (piecewise s hs f 0).integral μ = f.integral (μ.restrict s) := by
classical
refine (integral_eq_sum_of_subset ?_).trans
((sum_congr rfl fun y hy => ?_).trans (integral_eq_sum_filter _ _).symm)
· intro y hy
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, coe_piecewise, coe_zero, piecewise_eq_indicator,
mem_range_indicator] at *
rcases hy with ⟨⟨rfl, -⟩ | ⟨x, -, rfl⟩, h₀⟩
exacts [(h₀ rfl).elim, ⟨Set.mem_range_self _, h₀⟩]
· dsimp
rw [Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, indicator_preimage_of_not_mem,
Measure.restrict_apply (f.measurableSet_preimage _)]
exact fun h₀ => (mem_filter.1 hy).2 (Eq.symm h₀)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_piecewise_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_piecewise_zero
/-- Calculate the integral of `g ∘ f : α →ₛ F`, where `f` is an integrable function from `α` to `E`
and `g` is a function from `E` to `F`. We require `g 0 = 0` so that `g ∘ f` is integrable. -/
theorem map_integral (f : α →ₛ E) (g : E → F) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
(f.map g).integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range, ENNReal.toReal (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})) • g x :=
map_setToSimpleFunc _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_integral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_integral
/-- `SimpleFunc.integral` and `SimpleFunc.lintegral` agree when the integrand has type
`α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞`. But since `ℝ≥0∞` is not a `NormedSpace`, we need some form of coercion.
See `integral_eq_lintegral` for a simpler version. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral' {f : α →ₛ E} {g : E → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg0 : g 0 = 0)
(ht : ∀ b, g b ≠ ∞) :
(f.map (ENNReal.toReal ∘ g)).integral μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, g (f a) ∂μ) := by
have hf' : f.FinMeasSupp μ := integrable_iff_finMeasSupp.1 hf
simp only [← map_apply g f, lintegral_eq_lintegral]
rw [map_integral f _ hf, map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun b _ => ?_
-- Porting note: added `Function.comp_apply`
rw [smul_eq_mul, toReal_mul, mul_comm, Function.comp_apply]
· rintro a -
by_cases a0 : a = 0
· rw [a0, hg0, zero_mul]; exact WithTop.zero_ne_top
· apply mul_ne_top (ht a) (hf'.meas_preimage_singleton_ne_zero a0).ne
· simp [hg0]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral'
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E]
theorem integral_congr {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f.integral μ = g.integral μ :=
setToSimpleFunc_congr (weightedSMul μ) (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union hf h
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_congr MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_congr
/-- `SimpleFunc.bintegral` and `SimpleFunc.integral` agree when the integrand has type
`α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞`. But since `ℝ≥0∞` is not a `NormedSpace`, we need some form of coercion. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral {f : α →ₛ ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (h_pos : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
f.integral μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ] f.map (ENNReal.toReal ∘ ENNReal.ofReal) :=
h_pos.mono fun a h => (ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h).symm
rw [← integral_eq_lintegral' hf]
exacts [integral_congr hf this, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, fun b => ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral
theorem integral_add {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
integral μ (f + g) = integral μ f + integral μ g :=
setToSimpleFunc_add _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_add MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_add
theorem integral_neg {f : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) : integral μ (-f) = -integral μ f :=
setToSimpleFunc_neg _ weightedSMul_union hf
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_neg MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_neg
theorem integral_sub {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
integral μ (f - g) = integral μ f - integral μ g :=
setToSimpleFunc_sub _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_sub MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_sub
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) {f : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
integral μ (c • f) = c • integral μ f :=
setToSimpleFunc_smul _ weightedSMul_union weightedSMul_smul c hf
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_smul MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_smul
theorem norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * (μ s).toReal) {f : α →ₛ E}
(hf : Integrable f μ) : ‖f.setToSimpleFunc T‖ ≤ C * (f.map norm).integral μ :=
calc
‖f.setToSimpleFunc T‖ ≤ C * ∑ x ∈ f.range, ENNReal.toReal (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})) * ‖x‖ :=
norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm f hf
_ = C * (f.map norm).integral μ := by
rw [map_integral f norm hf norm_zero]; simp_rw [smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.norm_set_to_simple_func_le_integral_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm
theorem norm_integral_le_integral_norm (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
‖f.integral μ‖ ≤ (f.map norm).integral μ := by
refine (norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm _ (fun s _ _ => ?_) hf).trans (one_mul _).le
exact (norm_weightedSMul_le s).trans (one_mul _).symm.le
#align measure_theory.simple_func.norm_integral_le_integral_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.norm_integral_le_integral_norm
theorem integral_add_measure {ν} (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : Integrable f (μ + ν)) :
f.integral (μ + ν) = f.integral μ + f.integral ν := by
simp_rw [integral_def]
refine setToSimpleFunc_add_left'
(weightedSMul μ) (weightedSMul ν) (weightedSMul (μ + ν)) (fun s _ hμνs => ?_) hf
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Measure.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, ENNReal.add_ne_top] at hμνs
rw [weightedSMul_add_measure _ _ hμνs.1 hμνs.2]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_add_measure MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_add_measure
end Integral
end SimpleFunc
namespace L1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false -- `L1`
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : ‖f‖ = ((toSimpleFunc f).map norm).integral μ := by
rw [norm_eq_sum_mul f, (toSimpleFunc f).map_integral norm (SimpleFunc.integrable f) norm_zero]
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_eq_integral
section PosPart
/-- Positive part of a simple function in L1 space. -/
nonrec def posPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ :=
⟨Lp.posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ), by
rcases f with ⟨f, s, hsf⟩
use s.posPart
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Lp.coe_posPart, ← hsf, AEEqFun.posPart_mk,
SimpleFunc.coe_map, mk_eq_mk]
-- Porting note: added
simp [SimpleFunc.posPart, Function.comp, EventuallyEq.rfl] ⟩
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.pos_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.posPart
/-- Negative part of a simple function in L1 space. -/
def negPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ :=
posPart (-f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.neg_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.negPart
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_posPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : (posPart f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) = Lp.posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.coe_pos_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.coe_posPart
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_negPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : (negPart f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) = Lp.negPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.coe_neg_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.coe_negPart
end PosPart
section SimpleFuncIntegral
/-!
### The Bochner integral of `L1`
Define the Bochner integral on `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` by extension from the simple functions `α →₁ₛ[μ] E`,
and prove basic properties of this integral. -/
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E] {F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
attribute [local instance] simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space. -/
def integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : E :=
(toSimpleFunc f).integral μ
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral
theorem integral_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral f = (toSimpleFunc f).integral μ := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral
nonrec theorem integral_eq_lintegral {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ} (h_pos : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc f) :
integral f = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ((toSimpleFunc f) a) ∂μ) := by
rw [integral, SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h_pos]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral
theorem integral_eq_setToL1S (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral f = setToL1S (weightedSMul μ) f := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_set_to_L1s MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_setToL1S
nonrec theorem integral_congr {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
integral f = integral g :=
SimpleFunc.integral_congr (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_congr MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_congr
theorem integral_add (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral (f + g) = integral f + integral g :=
setToL1S_add _ (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union _ _
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_add MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_add
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral (c • f) = c • integral f :=
setToL1S_smul _ (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union weightedSMul_smul c f
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_smul MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_smul
theorem norm_integral_le_norm (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖ ≤ ‖f‖ := by
rw [integral, norm_eq_integral]
exact (toSimpleFunc f).norm_integral_le_integral_norm (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_integral_le_norm MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_integral_le_norm
variable {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
variable (α E μ 𝕜)
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space as a continuous linear map. -/
def integralCLM' : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] E :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous ⟨⟨integral, integral_add⟩, integral_smul⟩ 1 fun f =>
le_trans (norm_integral_le_norm _) <| by rw [one_mul]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_clm' MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integralCLM'
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space as a continuous linear map over ℝ. -/
def integralCLM : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] E :=
integralCLM' α E ℝ μ
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_clm MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integralCLM
variable {α E μ 𝕜}
local notation "Integral" => integralCLM α E μ
open ContinuousLinearMap
theorem norm_Integral_le_one : ‖Integral‖ ≤ 1 :=
-- Porting note: Old proof was `LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one _`
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one (fun f => by
rw [one_mul]
exact norm_integral_le_norm f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_Integral_le_one MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_Integral_le_one
section PosPart
theorem posPart_toSimpleFunc (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) :
toSimpleFunc (posPart f) =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc f).posPart := by
have eq : ∀ a, (toSimpleFunc f).posPart a = max ((toSimpleFunc f) a) 0 := fun a => rfl
have ae_eq : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, toSimpleFunc (posPart f) a = max ((toSimpleFunc f) a) 0 := by
filter_upwards [toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun (posPart f), Lp.coeFn_posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ),
toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f] with _ _ h₂ h₃
convert h₂ using 1
-- Porting note: added
rw [h₃]
refine ae_eq.mono fun a h => ?_
rw [h, eq]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.pos_part_to_simple_func MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.posPart_toSimpleFunc
theorem negPart_toSimpleFunc (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) :
toSimpleFunc (negPart f) =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc f).negPart := by
rw [SimpleFunc.negPart, MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart]
filter_upwards [posPart_toSimpleFunc (-f), neg_toSimpleFunc f]
intro a h₁ h₂
rw [h₁]
show max _ _ = max _ _
rw [h₂]
rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.neg_part_to_simple_func MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.negPart_toSimpleFunc
theorem integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : integral f = ‖posPart f‖ - ‖negPart f‖ := by
-- Convert things in `L¹` to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart
have ae_eq₁ : (toSimpleFunc f).posPart =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc (posPart f)).map norm := by
filter_upwards [posPart_toSimpleFunc f] with _ h
rw [SimpleFunc.map_apply, h]
conv_lhs => rw [← SimpleFunc.posPart_map_norm, SimpleFunc.map_apply]
-- Convert things in `L¹` to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart
have ae_eq₂ : (toSimpleFunc f).negPart =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc (negPart f)).map norm := by
filter_upwards [negPart_toSimpleFunc f] with _ h
rw [SimpleFunc.map_apply, h]
conv_lhs => rw [← SimpleFunc.negPart_map_norm, SimpleFunc.map_apply]
rw [integral, norm_eq_integral, norm_eq_integral, ← SimpleFunc.integral_sub]
· show (toSimpleFunc f).integral μ =
((toSimpleFunc (posPart f)).map norm - (toSimpleFunc (negPart f)).map norm).integral μ
apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_congr (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
filter_upwards [ae_eq₁, ae_eq₂] with _ h₁ h₂
show _ = _ - _
rw [← h₁, ← h₂]
have := (toSimpleFunc f).posPart_sub_negPart
conv_lhs => rw [← this]
rfl
· exact (SimpleFunc.integrable f).pos_part.congr ae_eq₁
· exact (SimpleFunc.integrable f).neg_part.congr ae_eq₂
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_norm_pos_part_sub MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub
end PosPart
end SimpleFuncIntegral
end SimpleFunc
open SimpleFunc
local notation "Integral" => @integralCLM α E _ _ _ _ _ μ _
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E]
[NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace E]
section IntegrationInL1
attribute [local instance] simpleFunc.normedSpace
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable (𝕜)
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space as a continuous linear map. -/
nonrec def integralCLM' : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] E :=
(integralCLM' α E 𝕜 μ).extend (coeToLp α E 𝕜) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.uniformInducing
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_clm' MeasureTheory.L1.integralCLM'
variable {𝕜}
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space as a continuous linear map over ℝ. -/
def integralCLM : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] E :=
integralCLM' ℝ
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_clm MeasureTheory.L1.integralCLM
-- Porting note: added `(E := E)` in several places below.
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space -/
irreducible_def integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) : E :=
integralCLM (E := E) f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral
theorem integral_eq (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral f = integralCLM (E := E) f := by
simp only [integral]
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_setToL1 (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
integral f = setToL1 (E := E) (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f := by
simp only [integral]; rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_set_to_L1 MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_setToL1
@[norm_cast]
theorem SimpleFunc.integral_L1_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
L1.integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) = SimpleFunc.integral f := by
simp only [integral, L1.integral]
exact setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_L1_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_L1_eq_integral
variable (α E)
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero : integral (0 : α →₁[μ] E) = 0 := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_zero integralCLM
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_zero MeasureTheory.L1.integral_zero
variable {α E}
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_add (f g : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (f + g) = integral f + integral g := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_add integralCLM f g
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_add MeasureTheory.L1.integral_add
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_neg (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (-f) = -integral f := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_neg integralCLM f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_neg MeasureTheory.L1.integral_neg
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_sub (f g : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (f - g) = integral f - integral g := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_sub integralCLM f g
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_sub MeasureTheory.L1.integral_sub
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (c • f) = c • integral f := by
simp only [integral]
show (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) (c • f) = c • (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) f
exact map_smul (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) c f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_smul MeasureTheory.L1.integral_smul
local notation "Integral" => @integralCLM α E _ _ μ _ _
local notation "sIntegral" => @SimpleFunc.integralCLM α E _ _ μ _
theorem norm_Integral_le_one : ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖ ≤ 1 :=
norm_setToL1_le (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) zero_le_one
#align measure_theory.L1.norm_Integral_le_one MeasureTheory.L1.norm_Integral_le_one
theorem nnnorm_Integral_le_one : ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖₊ ≤ 1 :=
norm_Integral_le_one
theorem norm_integral_le (f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖integral f‖ = ‖integralCLM (E := E) f‖ := by simp only [integral]
_ ≤ ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖ * ‖f‖ := le_opNorm _ _
_ ≤ 1 * ‖f‖ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right norm_Integral_le_one <| norm_nonneg _
_ = ‖f‖ := one_mul _
#align measure_theory.L1.norm_integral_le MeasureTheory.L1.norm_integral_le
theorem nnnorm_integral_le (f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖₊ ≤ ‖f‖₊ :=
norm_integral_le f
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_integral : Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] E => integral f := by
simp only [integral]
exact L1.integralCLM.continuous
#align measure_theory.L1.continuous_integral MeasureTheory.L1.continuous_integral
section PosPart
theorem integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) :
integral f = ‖Lp.posPart f‖ - ‖Lp.negPart f‖ := by
-- Use `isClosed_property` and `isClosed_eq`
refine @isClosed_property _ _ _ ((↑) : (α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) → α →₁[μ] ℝ)
(fun f : α →₁[μ] ℝ => integral f = ‖Lp.posPart f‖ - ‖Lp.negPart f‖)
(simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top) (isClosed_eq ?_ ?_) ?_ f
· simp only [integral]
exact cont _
· refine Continuous.sub (continuous_norm.comp Lp.continuous_posPart)
(continuous_norm.comp Lp.continuous_negPart)
-- Show that the property holds for all simple functions in the `L¹` space.
· intro s
norm_cast
exact SimpleFunc.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub _
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_norm_pos_part_sub MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub
end PosPart
end IntegrationInL1
end L1
/-!
## The Bochner integral on functions
Define the Bochner integral on functions generally to be the `L1` Bochner integral, for integrable
functions, and 0 otherwise; prove its basic properties.
-/
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [hE : CompleteSpace E] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F]
{G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G]
section
open scoped Classical
/-- The Bochner integral -/
irreducible_def integral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → G) : G :=
if _ : CompleteSpace G then
if hf : Integrable f μ then L1.integral (hf.toL1 f) else 0
else 0
#align measure_theory.integral MeasureTheory.integral
end
/-! In the notation for integrals, an expression like `∫ x, g ‖x‖ ∂μ` will not be parsed correctly,
and needs parentheses. We do not set the binding power of `r` to `0`, because then
`∫ x, f x = 0` will be parsed incorrectly. -/
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => integral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => integral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => integral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => integral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
section Properties
open ContinuousLinearMap MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc
variable {f g : α → E} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
theorem integral_eq (f : α → E) (hf : Integrable f μ) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = L1.integral (hf.toL1 f) := by
simp [integral, hE, hf]
#align measure_theory.integral_eq MeasureTheory.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_setToFun (f : α → E) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = setToFun μ (weightedSMul μ) (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f := by
simp only [integral, hE, L1.integral]; rfl
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_set_to_fun MeasureTheory.integral_eq_setToFun
theorem L1.integral_eq_integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) : L1.integral f = ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [integral, L1.integral, integral_eq_setToFun]
exact (L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_integral
theorem integral_undef {f : α → G} (h : ¬Integrable f μ) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp [integral, hG, h]
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_undef MeasureTheory.integral_undef
theorem Integrable.of_integral_ne_zero {f : α → G} (h : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≠ 0) : Integrable f μ :=
Not.imp_symm integral_undef h
theorem integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable {f : α → G} (h : ¬AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 :=
integral_undef <| not_and_of_not_left _ h
#align measure_theory.integral_non_ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable
variable (α G)
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero : ∫ _ : α, (0 : G) ∂μ = 0 := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_zero (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_zero MeasureTheory.integral_zero
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero' : integral μ (0 : α → G) = 0 :=
integral_zero α G
#align measure_theory.integral_zero' MeasureTheory.integral_zero'
variable {α G}
theorem integrable_of_integral_eq_one {f : α → ℝ} (h : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = 1) : Integrable f μ :=
.of_integral_ne_zero <| h ▸ one_ne_zero
#align measure_theory.integrable_of_integral_eq_one MeasureTheory.integrable_of_integral_eq_one
theorem integral_add {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ + ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_add (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf hg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_add MeasureTheory.integral_add
theorem integral_add' {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, (f + g) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ + ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_add hf hg
#align measure_theory.integral_add' MeasureTheory.integral_add'
theorem integral_finset_sum {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → G} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
∫ a, ∑ i ∈ s, f i a ∂μ = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫ a, f i a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_finset_sum (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul _) s hf
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_finset_sum MeasureTheory.integral_finset_sum
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_neg (f : α → G) : ∫ a, -f a ∂μ = -∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_neg (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_neg MeasureTheory.integral_neg
theorem integral_neg' (f : α → G) : ∫ a, (-f) a ∂μ = -∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_neg f
#align measure_theory.integral_neg' MeasureTheory.integral_neg'
theorem integral_sub {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ - ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_sub (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf hg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_sub MeasureTheory.integral_sub
theorem integral_sub' {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, (f - g) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ - ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_sub hf hg
#align measure_theory.integral_sub' MeasureTheory.integral_sub'
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_smul [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 G] (c : 𝕜) (f : α → G) :
∫ a, c • f a ∂μ = c • ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_smul (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) weightedSMul_smul c f
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_smul MeasureTheory.integral_smul
theorem integral_mul_left {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_smul r f
#align measure_theory.integral_mul_left MeasureTheory.integral_mul_left
theorem integral_mul_right {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by
simp only [mul_comm]; exact integral_mul_left r f
#align measure_theory.integral_mul_right MeasureTheory.integral_mul_right
theorem integral_div {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, f a / r ∂μ = (∫ a, f a ∂μ) / r := by
simpa only [← div_eq_mul_inv] using integral_mul_right r⁻¹ f
#align measure_theory.integral_div MeasureTheory.integral_div
theorem integral_congr_ae {f g : α → G} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_congr_ae (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) h
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.integral_congr_ae
-- Porting note: `nolint simpNF` added because simplify fails on left-hand side
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral {f : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, (hf.toL1 f) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [MeasureTheory.integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_toL1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf
· simp [MeasureTheory.integral, hG]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_integral : Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] G => ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuous_setToFun (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
· simp [integral, hG, continuous_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_integral MeasureTheory.continuous_integral
theorem norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm (f : α → G) :
‖∫ a, f a ∂μ‖ ≤ ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [integral_eq f hf, ← Integrable.norm_toL1_eq_lintegral_norm f hf]
exact L1.norm_integral_le _
· rw [integral_undef hf, norm_zero]; exact toReal_nonneg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm MeasureTheory.norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm
theorem ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm (f : α → G) :
(‖∫ a, f a ∂μ‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_of_le_toReal
exact norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm f
#align measure_theory.ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm MeasureTheory.ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm
theorem integral_eq_zero_of_ae {f : α → G} (hf : f =ᵐ[μ] 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 := by
simp [integral_congr_ae hf, integral_zero]
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_zero_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_eq_zero_of_ae
/-- If `f` has finite integral, then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. -/
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero {ι} {f : α → G}
(hf : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) {l : Filter ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
simp_rw [← coe_nnnorm, ← NNReal.coe_zero, NNReal.tendsto_coe, ← ENNReal.tendsto_coe,
ENNReal.coe_zero]
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds
(tendsto_set_lintegral_zero (ne_of_lt hf) hs) (fun i => zero_le _)
fun i => ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm _
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero :=
HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
/-- If `f` is integrable, then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. -/
theorem Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero {ι} {f : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ)
{l : Filter ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) :=
hf.2.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero hs
#align measure_theory.integrable.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero MeasureTheory.Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias Integrable.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero :=
Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x, f x ∂μ`. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_of_L1 {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G} {l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ)
(hF : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x, ‖F i x - f x‖₊ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact tendsto_setToFun_of_L1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f hfi hFi hF
· simp [integral, hG, tendsto_const_nhds]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.tendsto_integral_of_L1 MeasureTheory.tendsto_integral_of_L1
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_integral_of_L1' {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G} {l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ snorm (F i - f) 1 μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_integral_of_L1 f hfi hFi ?_
simp_rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, Pi.sub_apply] at hF
exact hF
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1 {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G}
{l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫⁻ x, ‖F i x - f x‖₊ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0))
(s : Set α) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_integral_of_L1 f hfi.restrict ?_ ?_
· filter_upwards [hFi] with i hi using hi.restrict
· simp_rw [← snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm] at hF ⊢
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds hF (fun _ ↦ zero_le')
(fun _ ↦ snorm_mono_measure _ Measure.restrict_le_self)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias tendsto_set_integral_of_L1 := tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1' {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G}
{l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ snorm (F i - f) 1 μ) l (𝓝 0))
(s : Set α) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1 f hfi hFi ?_ s
simp_rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, Pi.sub_apply] at hF
exact hF
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias tendsto_set_integral_of_L1' := tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1'
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [FirstCountableTopology X]
theorem continuousWithinAt_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ} {s : Set X}
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => F x a) s x₀) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) s x₀ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousWithinAt_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousWithinAt_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_within_at_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousWithinAt_of_dominated
theorem continuousAt_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ}
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousAt (fun x => F x a) x₀) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) x₀ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousAt_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousAt_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_at_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousAt_of_dominated
theorem continuousOn_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {bound : α → ℝ} {s : Set X}
(hF_meas : ∀ x ∈ s, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousOn (fun x => F x a) s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) s := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousOn_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousOn_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_on_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousOn_of_dominated
theorem continuous_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {bound : α → ℝ}
(hF_meas : ∀ x, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ) (h_bound : ∀ x, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a)
(bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ) (h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Continuous fun x => F x a) :
Continuous fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuous_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuous_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuous_of_dominated
/-- The Bochner integral of a real-valued function `f : α → ℝ` is the difference between the
integral of the positive part of `f` and the integral of the negative part of `f`. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ =
ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, .ofReal (f a) ∂μ) - ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, .ofReal (-f a) ∂μ) := by
let f₁ := hf.toL1 f
-- Go to the `L¹` space
have eq₁ : ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) = ‖Lp.posPart f₁‖ := by
rw [L1.norm_def]
congr 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_posPart f₁, hf.coeFn_toL1] with _ h₁ h₂
rw [h₁, h₂, ENNReal.ofReal]
congr 1
apply NNReal.eq
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg (le_max_right _ _)]
rw [Real.coe_toNNReal', NNReal.coe_mk]
-- Go to the `L¹` space
have eq₂ : ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (-f a) ∂μ) = ‖Lp.negPart f₁‖ := by
rw [L1.norm_def]
congr 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_negPart f₁, hf.coeFn_toL1] with _ h₁ h₂
rw [h₁, h₂, ENNReal.ofReal]
congr 1
apply NNReal.eq
simp only [Real.coe_toNNReal', coe_nnnorm, nnnorm_neg]
rw [Real.norm_of_nonpos (min_le_right _ _), ← max_neg_neg, neg_zero]
rw [eq₁, eq₂, integral, dif_pos, dif_pos]
exact L1.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub _
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part MeasureTheory.integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part
theorem integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f)
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· rw [integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part hfi]
have h_min : ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (-f a) ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [lintegral_eq_zero_iff']
· refine hf.mono ?_
simp only [Pi.zero_apply]
intro a h
simp only [h, neg_nonpos, ofReal_eq_zero]
· exact measurable_ofReal.comp_aemeasurable hfm.aemeasurable.neg
rw [h_min, zero_toReal, _root_.sub_zero]
· rw [integral_undef hfi]
simp_rw [Integrable, hfm, hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm, lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, true_and_iff,
Classical.not_not] at hfi
have : ∫⁻ a : α, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_congr_ae (hf.mono fun a h => ?_)
dsimp only
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg h]
rw [this, hfi]; rfl
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae
theorem integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup P] {f : α → P}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ) := by
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae _ hf.norm]
· simp_rw [ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
· filter_upwards; simp_rw [Pi.zero_apply, norm_nonneg, imp_true_iff]
#align measure_theory.integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup P] {f : α → P}
(hf : Integrable f μ) : ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
rw [integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hf.aestronglyMeasurable,
ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mp hf.2)]
#align measure_theory.of_real_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, (Real.toNNReal (f a) : ℝ) ∂μ - ∫ a, (Real.toNNReal (-f a) : ℝ) ∂μ := by
rw [← integral_sub hf.real_toNNReal]
· simp
· exact hf.neg.real_toNNReal
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part MeasureTheory.integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part
theorem integral_nonneg_of_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
have A : CompleteSpace ℝ := by infer_instance
simp only [integral_def, A, L1.integral_def, dite_true, ge_iff_le]
exact setToFun_nonneg (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
(fun s _ _ => weightedSMul_nonneg s) hf
#align measure_theory.integral_nonneg_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_nonneg_of_ae
theorem lintegral_coe_eq_integral (f : α → ℝ≥0) (hfi : Integrable (fun x => (f x : ℝ)) μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a, f a ∂μ) := by
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => (f x).coe_nonneg)
hfi.aestronglyMeasurable, ← ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top]
convert hfi.hasFiniteIntegral
-- Porting note: `convert` no longer unfolds `HasFiniteIntegral`
simp_rw [HasFiniteIntegral, NNReal.nnnorm_eq]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_coe_eq_integral MeasureTheory.lintegral_coe_eq_integral
theorem ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (hfi : Integrable f μ) (f_nn : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x, f x ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ] (‖f ·‖) := f_nn.mono fun _x hx ↦ (abs_of_nonneg hx).symm
simp_rw [integral_congr_ae this, ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hfi,
← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (this.symm.fun_comp ENNReal.ofReal)
#align measure_theory.of_real_integral_eq_lintegral_of_real MeasureTheory.ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal
theorem integral_toReal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) :
∫ a, (f a).toReal ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ).toReal := by
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae _ hfm.ennreal_toReal.aestronglyMeasurable,
lintegral_congr_ae (ofReal_toReal_ae_eq hf)]
exact eventually_of_forall fun x => ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align measure_theory.integral_to_real MeasureTheory.integral_toReal
theorem lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hfi : Integrable (fun x => (f x : ℝ)) μ)
{b : ℝ≥0} : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ b ↔ ∫ a, (f a : ℝ) ∂μ ≤ b := by
rw [lintegral_coe_eq_integral f hfi, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.coe_le_coe,
Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le
theorem integral_coe_le_of_lintegral_coe_le {f : α → ℝ≥0} {b : ℝ≥0} (h : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ b) :
∫ a, (f a : ℝ) ∂μ ≤ b := by
by_cases hf : Integrable (fun a => (f a : ℝ)) μ
· exact (lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le hf).1 h
· rw [integral_undef hf]; exact b.2
#align measure_theory.integral_coe_le_of_lintegral_coe_le MeasureTheory.integral_coe_le_of_lintegral_coe_le
theorem integral_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_nonneg_of_ae <| eventually_of_forall hf
#align measure_theory.integral_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_nonneg
theorem integral_nonpos_of_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ 0 := by
have hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] -f := hf.mono fun a h => by rwa [Pi.neg_apply, Pi.zero_apply, neg_nonneg]
have : 0 ≤ ∫ a, -f a ∂μ := integral_nonneg_of_ae hf
rwa [integral_neg, neg_nonneg] at this
#align measure_theory.integral_nonpos_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_nonpos_of_ae
theorem integral_nonpos {f : α → ℝ} (hf : f ≤ 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ 0 :=
integral_nonpos_of_ae <| eventually_of_forall hf
#align measure_theory.integral_nonpos MeasureTheory.integral_nonpos
theorem integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi.1, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff,
← ENNReal.not_lt_top, ← hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal hf, hfi.2, not_true_eq_false, or_false_iff]
-- Porting note: split into parts, to make `rw` and `simp` work
rw [lintegral_eq_zero_iff']
· rw [← hf.le_iff_eq, Filter.EventuallyEq, Filter.EventuallyLE]
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, ofReal_eq_zero]
· exact (ENNReal.measurable_ofReal.comp_aemeasurable hfi.1.aemeasurable)
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae
theorem integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall hf) hfi
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
lemma integral_eq_iff_of_ae_le {f g : α → ℝ}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, g a ∂μ ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
refine ⟨fun h_le ↦ EventuallyEq.symm ?_, fun h ↦ integral_congr_ae h⟩
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero,
← integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae ((sub_nonneg_ae _ _).mpr hfg) (hg.sub hf)]
simpa [Pi.sub_apply, integral_sub hg hf, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
theorem integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
(0 < ∫ x, f x ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f) := by
simp_rw [(integral_nonneg_of_ae hf).lt_iff_ne, pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, @eq_comm ℝ 0,
integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi, Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Pi.zero_apply,
Function.support]
#align measure_theory.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae
theorem integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
(0 < ∫ x, f x ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f) :=
integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall hf) hfi
#align measure_theory.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg
lemma integral_exp_pos {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ} [hμ : NeZero μ]
(hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ Real.exp (f x)) μ) :
0 < ∫ x, Real.exp (f x) ∂μ := by
rw [integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg (fun x ↦ (Real.exp_pos _).le) hf]
suffices (Function.support fun x ↦ Real.exp (f x)) = Set.univ by simp [this, hμ.out]
ext1 x
simp only [Function.mem_support, ne_eq, (Real.exp_pos _).ne', not_false_eq_true, Set.mem_univ]
/-- Monotone convergence theorem for real-valued functions and Bochner integrals -/
lemma integral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone {μ : Measure α} {f : ℕ → α → ℝ} {F : α → ℝ}
(hf : ∀ n, Integrable (f n) μ) (hF : Integrable F μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n ↦ f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n ↦ f n x) atTop (𝓝 (F x))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, F x ∂μ)) := by
-- switch from the Bochner to the Lebesgue integral
let f' := fun n x ↦ f n x - f 0 x
have hf'_nonneg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n, 0 ≤ f' n x := by
filter_upwards [h_mono] with a ha n
simp [f', ha (zero_le n)]
have hf'_meas : ∀ n, Integrable (f' n) μ := fun n ↦ (hf n).sub (hf 0)
suffices Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, f' n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, (F - f 0) x ∂μ)) by
simp_rw [integral_sub (hf _) (hf _), integral_sub' hF (hf 0), tendsto_sub_const_iff] at this
exact this
have hF_ge : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] fun x ↦ (F - f 0) x := by
filter_upwards [h_tendsto, h_mono] with x hx_tendsto hx_mono
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, Pi.sub_apply, sub_nonneg]
exact ge_of_tendsto' hx_tendsto (fun n ↦ hx_mono (zero_le _))
rw [ae_all_iff] at hf'_nonneg
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (hf'_nonneg _) (hf'_meas _).1]
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hF_ge (hF.1.sub (hf 0).1)]
have h_cont := ENNReal.continuousAt_toReal (x := ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ((F - f 0) a) ∂μ) ?_
swap
· rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal (hF.sub (hf 0)) hF_ge]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top
refine h_cont.tendsto.comp ?_
-- use the result for the Lebesgue integral
refine lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun n ↦ ((hf n).sub (hf 0)).aemeasurable.ennreal_ofReal
· filter_upwards [h_mono] with x hx n m hnm
refine ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
simp only [f', tsub_le_iff_right, sub_add_cancel]
exact hx hnm
· filter_upwards [h_tendsto] with x hx
refine (ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.tendsto _).comp ?_
simp only [Pi.sub_apply]
exact Tendsto.sub hx tendsto_const_nhds
/-- Monotone convergence theorem for real-valued functions and Bochner integrals -/
lemma integral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_antitone {μ : Measure α} {f : ℕ → α → ℝ} {F : α → ℝ}
(hf : ∀ n, Integrable (f n) μ) (hF : Integrable F μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Antitone fun n ↦ f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n ↦ f n x) atTop (𝓝 (F x))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, F x ∂μ)) := by
suffices Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, -f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, -F x ∂μ)) by
suffices Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, - -f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, - -F x ∂μ)) by
simpa [neg_neg] using this
convert this.neg <;> rw [integral_neg]
refine integral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone (fun n ↦ (hf n).neg) hF.neg ?_ ?_
· filter_upwards [h_mono] with x hx n m hnm using neg_le_neg_iff.mpr <| hx hnm
· filter_upwards [h_tendsto] with x hx using hx.neg
/-- If a monotone sequence of functions has an upper bound and the sequence of integrals of these
functions tends to the integral of the upper bound, then the sequence of functions converges
almost everywhere to the upper bound. -/
lemma tendsto_of_integral_tendsto_of_monotone {μ : Measure α} {f : ℕ → α → ℝ} {F : α → ℝ}
(hf_int : ∀ n, Integrable (f n) μ) (hF_int : Integrable F μ)
(hf_tendsto : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ a, f i a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ a, F a ∂μ)))
(hf_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Monotone (fun i ↦ f i a))
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, f i a ≤ F a) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i ↦ f i a) atTop (𝓝 (F a)) := by
-- reduce to the `ℝ≥0∞` case
let f' : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun n a ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (f n a - f 0 a)
let F' : α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun a ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (F a - f 0 a)
have hf'_int_eq : ∀ i, ∫⁻ a, f' i a ∂μ = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a, f i a ∂μ - ∫ a, f 0 a ∂μ) := by
intro i
unfold_let f'
rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal, integral_sub (hf_int i) (hf_int 0)]
· exact (hf_int i).sub (hf_int 0)
· filter_upwards [hf_mono] with a h_mono
simp [h_mono (zero_le i)]
have hF'_int_eq : ∫⁻ a, F' a ∂μ = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a, F a ∂μ - ∫ a, f 0 a ∂μ) := by
unfold_let F'
rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal, integral_sub hF_int (hf_int 0)]
· exact hF_int.sub (hf_int 0)
· filter_upwards [hf_bound] with a h_bound
simp [h_bound 0]
have h_tendsto : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫⁻ a, f' i a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, F' a ∂μ)) := by
simp_rw [hf'_int_eq, hF'_int_eq]
refine (ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.tendsto _).comp ?_
rwa [tendsto_sub_const_iff]
have h_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Monotone (fun i ↦ f' i a) := by
filter_upwards [hf_mono] with a ha_mono i j hij
refine ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
simp [ha_mono hij]
have h_bound : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, f' i a ≤ F' a := by
filter_upwards [hf_bound] with a ha_bound i
refine ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
simp only [tsub_le_iff_right, sub_add_cancel, ha_bound i]
-- use the corresponding lemma for `ℝ≥0∞`
have h := tendsto_of_lintegral_tendsto_of_monotone ?_ h_tendsto h_mono h_bound ?_
rotate_left
· exact (hF_int.1.aemeasurable.sub (hf_int 0).1.aemeasurable).ennreal_ofReal
· exact ((lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm _).trans_lt (hF_int.sub (hf_int 0)).2).ne
filter_upwards [h, hf_mono, hf_bound] with a ha ha_mono ha_bound
have h1 : (fun i ↦ f i a) = fun i ↦ (f' i a).toReal + f 0 a := by
unfold_let f'
ext i
rw [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal]
· abel
· simp [ha_mono (zero_le i)]
have h2 : F a = (F' a).toReal + f 0 a := by
unfold_let F'
rw [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal]
· abel
· simp [ha_bound 0]
rw [h1, h2]
refine Filter.Tendsto.add ?_ tendsto_const_nhds
exact (ENNReal.continuousAt_toReal ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top).tendsto.comp ha
/-- If an antitone sequence of functions has a lower bound and the sequence of integrals of these
functions tends to the integral of the lower bound, then the sequence of functions converges
almost everywhere to the lower bound. -/
lemma tendsto_of_integral_tendsto_of_antitone {μ : Measure α} {f : ℕ → α → ℝ} {F : α → ℝ}
(hf_int : ∀ n, Integrable (f n) μ) (hF_int : Integrable F μ)
(hf_tendsto : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ a, f i a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ a, F a ∂μ)))
(hf_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Antitone (fun i ↦ f i a))
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, F a ≤ f i a) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i ↦ f i a) atTop (𝓝 (F a)) := by
let f' : ℕ → α → ℝ := fun i a ↦ - f i a
let F' : α → ℝ := fun a ↦ - F a
suffices ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i ↦ f' i a) atTop (𝓝 (F' a)) by
filter_upwards [this] with a ha_tendsto
convert ha_tendsto.neg
· simp [f']
· simp [F']
refine tendsto_of_integral_tendsto_of_monotone (fun n ↦ (hf_int n).neg) hF_int.neg ?_ ?_ ?_
· convert hf_tendsto.neg
· rw [integral_neg]
· rw [integral_neg]
· filter_upwards [hf_mono] with a ha i j hij
simp [f', ha hij]
· filter_upwards [hf_bound] with a ha i
simp [f', F', ha i]
section NormedAddCommGroup
variable {H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H]
theorem L1.norm_eq_integral_norm (f : α →₁[μ] H) : ‖f‖ = ∫ a, ‖f a‖ ∂μ := by
simp only [snorm, snorm', ENNReal.one_toReal, ENNReal.rpow_one, Lp.norm_def, if_false,
ENNReal.one_ne_top, one_ne_zero, _root_.div_one]
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall (by simp [norm_nonneg]))
(Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f).norm]
simp [ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.L1.norm_eq_integral_norm MeasureTheory.L1.norm_eq_integral_norm
theorem L1.dist_eq_integral_dist (f g : α →₁[μ] H) : dist f g = ∫ a, dist (f a) (g a) ∂μ := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm, L1.norm_eq_integral_norm]
exact integral_congr_ae <| (Lp.coeFn_sub _ _).fun_comp norm
theorem L1.norm_of_fun_eq_integral_norm {f : α → H} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
‖hf.toL1 f‖ = ∫ a, ‖f a‖ ∂μ := by
rw [L1.norm_eq_integral_norm]
exact integral_congr_ae <| hf.coeFn_toL1.fun_comp _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.L1.norm_of_fun_eq_integral_norm MeasureTheory.L1.norm_of_fun_eq_integral_norm
theorem Memℒp.snorm_eq_integral_rpow_norm {f : α → H} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp1 : p ≠ 0) (hp2 : p ≠ ∞)
(hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
snorm f p μ = ENNReal.ofReal ((∫ a, ‖f a‖ ^ p.toReal ∂μ) ^ p.toReal⁻¹) := by
have A : ∫⁻ a : α, ENNReal.ofReal (‖f a‖ ^ p.toReal) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a : α, ‖f a‖₊ ^ p.toReal ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) toReal_nonneg, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
simp only [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp1 hp2, one_div]
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae]; rotate_left
· exact ae_of_all _ fun x => by positivity
· exact (hf.aestronglyMeasurable.norm.aemeasurable.pow_const _).aestronglyMeasurable
rw [A, ← ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg toReal_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 toReal_nonneg), ofReal_toReal]
exact (lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top hp1 hp2 hf.2).ne
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_eq_integral_rpow_norm MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_eq_integral_rpow_norm
end NormedAddCommGroup
theorem integral_mono_ae {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (h : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
have A : CompleteSpace ℝ := by infer_instance
simp only [integral, A, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_mono (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
(fun s _ _ => weightedSMul_nonneg s) hf hg h
#align measure_theory.integral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.integral_mono_ae
@[mono]
theorem integral_mono {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (h : f ≤ g) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_mono_ae hf hg <| eventually_of_forall h
#align measure_theory.integral_mono MeasureTheory.integral_mono
theorem integral_mono_of_nonneg {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hgi : Integrable g μ)
(h : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ
· refine integral_mono_ae ⟨hfm, ?_⟩ hgi h
refine hgi.hasFiniteIntegral.mono <| h.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hfg => ?_
simpa [abs_of_nonneg hf, abs_of_nonneg (le_trans hf hfg)]
· rw [integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable hfm]
exact integral_nonneg_of_ae (hf.trans h)
#align measure_theory.integral_mono_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_mono_of_nonneg
theorem integral_mono_measure {f : α → ℝ} {ν} (hle : μ ≤ ν) (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[ν] f)
(hfi : Integrable f ν) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂ν := by
have hfi' : Integrable f μ := hfi.mono_measure hle
have hf' : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f := hle.absolutelyContinuous hf
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hf' hfi'.1, integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi.1,
ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal]
exacts [lintegral_mono' hle le_rfl, ((hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal hf').1 hfi'.2).ne,
((hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal hf).1 hfi.2).ne]
#align measure_theory.integral_mono_measure MeasureTheory.integral_mono_measure
theorem norm_integral_le_integral_norm (f : α → G) : ‖∫ a, f a ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ a, ‖f a‖ ∂μ := by
have le_ae : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, 0 ≤ ‖f a‖ := eventually_of_forall fun a => norm_nonneg _
by_cases h : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ
· calc
‖∫ a, f a ∂μ‖ ≤ ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) :=
norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm _
_ = ∫ a, ‖f a‖ ∂μ := (integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae le_ae <| h.norm).symm
· rw [integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable h, norm_zero]
exact integral_nonneg_of_ae le_ae
#align measure_theory.norm_integral_le_integral_norm MeasureTheory.norm_integral_le_integral_norm
theorem norm_integral_le_of_norm_le {f : α → G} {g : α → ℝ} (hg : Integrable g μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) : ‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ :=
calc
‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ := norm_integral_le_integral_norm f
_ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ := integral_mono_of_nonneg (eventually_of_forall fun _ => norm_nonneg _) hg h
#align measure_theory.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le MeasureTheory.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le
theorem SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral (f : α →ₛ E) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
f.integral μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.integral_eq f hfi, ← L1.SimpleFunc.toLp_one_eq_toL1,
L1.SimpleFunc.integral_L1_eq_integral, L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral]
exact SimpleFunc.integral_congr hfi (Lp.simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc_toLp _ _).symm
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_integral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral
theorem SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum (f : α →ₛ E) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range, ENNReal.toReal (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})) • x := by
rw [← f.integral_eq_integral hfi, SimpleFunc.integral, ← SimpleFunc.integral_eq]; rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_sum MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum
@[simp]
theorem integral_const (c : E) : ∫ _ : α, c ∂μ = (μ univ).toReal • c := by
cases' (@le_top _ _ _ (μ univ)).lt_or_eq with hμ hμ
· haveI : IsFiniteMeasure μ := ⟨hμ⟩
simp only [integral, hE, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_const (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul _) _
· by_cases hc : c = 0
· simp [hc, integral_zero]
· have : ¬Integrable (fun _ : α => c) μ := by
simp only [integrable_const_iff, not_or]
exact ⟨hc, hμ.not_lt⟩
simp [integral_undef, *]
#align measure_theory.integral_const MeasureTheory.integral_const
theorem norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → G} {C : ℝ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) : ‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ C * (μ univ).toReal :=
calc
‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ _, C ∂μ := norm_integral_le_of_norm_le (integrable_const C) h
_ = C * (μ univ).toReal := by rw [integral_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align measure_theory.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const MeasureTheory.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const
theorem tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] {f : α → E}
{s : Set E} [SeparableSpace s] (hfi : Integrable f μ) (hfm : Measurable f)
(hs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ closure s) {y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) (h₀i : Integrable (fun _ => y₀) μ) :
Tendsto (fun n => (SimpleFunc.approxOn f hfm s y₀ h₀ n).integral μ)
atTop (𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) := by
have hfi' := SimpleFunc.integrable_approxOn hfm hfi h₀ h₀i
simp only [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral _ (hfi' _), integral, hE, L1.integral]
exact tendsto_setToFun_approxOn_of_measurable (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hfi hfm hs h₀ h₀i
#align measure_theory.tendsto_integral_approx_on_of_measurable MeasureTheory.tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable
theorem tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
{f : α → E} (fmeas : Measurable f) (hf : Integrable f μ) (s : Set E) [SeparableSpace s]
(hs : range f ∪ {0} ⊆ s) :
Tendsto (fun n => (SimpleFunc.approxOn f fmeas s 0 (hs <| by simp) n).integral μ) atTop
(𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) := by
apply tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable hf fmeas _ _ (integrable_zero _ _ _)
exact eventually_of_forall fun x => subset_closure (hs (Set.mem_union_left _ (mem_range_self _)))
#align measure_theory.tendsto_integral_approx_on_of_measurable_of_range_subset MeasureTheory.tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset
theorem tendsto_integral_norm_approxOn_sub [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] {f : α → E}
(fmeas : Measurable f) (hf : Integrable f μ) [SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E)] :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, ‖SimpleFunc.approxOn f fmeas (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) n x - f x‖ ∂μ)
atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert (tendsto_toReal zero_ne_top).comp (tendsto_approxOn_range_L1_nnnorm fmeas hf) with n
rw [integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm]
· simp
· apply (SimpleFunc.aestronglyMeasurable _).sub
apply (stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨fmeas, ?_⟩ ).aestronglyMeasurable
exact .mono (.of_subtype (range f ∪ {0})) subset_union_left
variable {ν : Measure α}
theorem integral_add_measure {f : α → G} (hμ : Integrable f μ) (hν : Integrable f ν) :
∫ x, f x ∂(μ + ν) = ∫ x, f x ∂μ + ∫ x, f x ∂ν := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G; swap
· simp [integral, hG]
have hfi := hμ.add_measure hν
simp_rw [integral_eq_setToFun]
have hμ_dfma : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (μ + ν) (weightedSMul μ : Set α → G →L[ℝ] G) 1 :=
DominatedFinMeasAdditive.add_measure_right μ ν (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
zero_le_one
have hν_dfma : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (μ + ν) (weightedSMul ν : Set α → G →L[ℝ] G) 1 :=
DominatedFinMeasAdditive.add_measure_left μ ν (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul ν)
zero_le_one
rw [← setToFun_congr_measure_of_add_right hμ_dfma
(dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f hfi,
← setToFun_congr_measure_of_add_left hν_dfma (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul ν) f hfi]
refine setToFun_add_left' _ _ _ (fun s _ hμνs => ?_) f
rw [Measure.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, add_lt_top] at hμνs
rw [weightedSMul, weightedSMul, weightedSMul, ← add_smul, Measure.coe_add, Pi.add_apply,
toReal_add hμνs.1.ne hμνs.2.ne]
#align measure_theory.integral_add_measure MeasureTheory.integral_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → G) :
(∫ x, f x ∂(0 : Measure α)) = 0 := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_measure_zero (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul _) rfl
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_zero_measure MeasureTheory.integral_zero_measure
theorem integral_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → G} {μ : ι → Measure α}
{s : Finset ι} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable f (μ i)) :
∫ a, f a ∂(∑ i ∈ s, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫ a, f a ∂μ i := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction_on with
| h₁ => simp
| h₂ h ih =>
rw [Finset.forall_mem_cons] at hf
rw [Finset.sum_cons, Finset.sum_cons, ← ih hf.2]
exact integral_add_measure hf.1 (integrable_finset_sum_measure.2 hf.2)
#align measure_theory.integral_finset_sum_measure MeasureTheory.integral_finset_sum_measure
theorem nndist_integral_add_measure_le_lintegral
{f : α → G} (h₁ : Integrable f μ) (h₂ : Integrable f ν) :
(nndist (∫ x, f x ∂μ) (∫ x, f x ∂(μ + ν)) : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂ν := by
rw [integral_add_measure h₁ h₂, nndist_comm, nndist_eq_nnnorm, add_sub_cancel_left]
exact ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm _
#align measure_theory.nndist_integral_add_measure_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.nndist_integral_add_measure_le_lintegral
theorem hasSum_integral_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → G} {μ : ι → Measure α}
(hf : Integrable f (Measure.sum μ)) :
HasSum (fun i => ∫ a, f a ∂μ i) (∫ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ) := by
have hfi : ∀ i, Integrable f (μ i) := fun i => hf.mono_measure (Measure.le_sum _ _)
simp only [HasSum, ← integral_finset_sum_measure fun i _ => hfi i]
refine Metric.nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_right_iff.mpr fun ε ε0 => ?_
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using ε0.le
have hf_lt : (∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂Measure.sum μ) < ∞ := hf.2
have hmem : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 (∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂Measure.sum μ), (∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂Measure.sum μ) < y + ε := by
refine tendsto_id.add tendsto_const_nhds (lt_mem_nhds (α := ℝ≥0∞) <| ENNReal.lt_add_right ?_ ?_)
exacts [hf_lt.ne, ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 (NNReal.coe_ne_zero.1 ε0.ne')]
refine ((hasSum_lintegral_measure (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) μ).eventually hmem).mono fun s hs => ?_
obtain ⟨ν, hν⟩ : ∃ ν, (∑ i ∈ s, μ i) + ν = Measure.sum μ := by
refine ⟨Measure.sum fun i : ↥(sᶜ : Set ι) => μ i, ?_⟩
simpa only [← Measure.sum_coe_finset] using Measure.sum_add_sum_compl (s : Set ι) μ
rw [Metric.mem_ball, ← coe_nndist, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← hν]
rw [← hν, integrable_add_measure] at hf
refine (nndist_integral_add_measure_le_lintegral hf.1 hf.2).trans_lt ?_
rw [← hν, lintegral_add_measure, lintegral_finset_sum_measure] at hs
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left hs
#align measure_theory.has_sum_integral_measure MeasureTheory.hasSum_integral_measure
theorem integral_sum_measure {ι} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → G} {μ : ι → Measure α}
(hf : Integrable f (Measure.sum μ)) : ∫ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ = ∑' i, ∫ a, f a ∂μ i :=
(hasSum_integral_measure hf).tsum_eq.symm
#align measure_theory.integral_sum_measure MeasureTheory.integral_sum_measure
@[simp]
theorem integral_smul_measure (f : α → G) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫ x, f x ∂c • μ = c.toReal • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G; swap
· simp [integral, hG]
-- First we consider the “degenerate” case `c = ∞`
rcases eq_or_ne c ∞ with (rfl | hc)
· rw [ENNReal.top_toReal, zero_smul, integral_eq_setToFun, setToFun_top_smul_measure]
-- Main case: `c ≠ ∞`
simp_rw [integral_eq_setToFun, ← setToFun_smul_left]
have hdfma : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (weightedSMul (c • μ) : Set α → G →L[ℝ] G) c.toReal :=
mul_one c.toReal ▸ (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul (c • μ)).of_smul_measure c hc
have hdfma_smul := dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul (F := G) (c • μ)
rw [← setToFun_congr_smul_measure c hc hdfma hdfma_smul f]
exact setToFun_congr_left' _ _ (fun s _ _ => weightedSMul_smul_measure μ c) f
#align measure_theory.integral_smul_measure MeasureTheory.integral_smul_measure
@[simp]
theorem integral_smul_nnreal_measure (f : α → G) (c : ℝ≥0) :
∫ x, f x ∂(c • μ) = c • ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
integral_smul_measure f (c : ℝ≥0∞)
theorem integral_map_of_stronglyMeasurable {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {φ : α → β} (hφ : Measurable φ)
{f : β → G} (hfm : StronglyMeasurable f) : ∫ y, f y ∂Measure.map φ μ = ∫ x, f (φ x) ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G; swap
· simp [integral, hG]
by_cases hfi : Integrable f (Measure.map φ μ); swap
· rw [integral_undef hfi, integral_undef]
exact fun hfφ => hfi ((integrable_map_measure hfm.aestronglyMeasurable hφ.aemeasurable).2 hfφ)
borelize G
have : SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set G) := hfm.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
refine tendsto_nhds_unique
(tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset hfm.measurable hfi _ Subset.rfl) ?_
convert tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset (hfm.measurable.comp hφ)
((integrable_map_measure hfm.aestronglyMeasurable hφ.aemeasurable).1 hfi) (range f ∪ {0})
(by simp [insert_subset_insert, Set.range_comp_subset_range]) using 1
ext1 i
simp only [SimpleFunc.approxOn_comp, SimpleFunc.integral_eq, Measure.map_apply, hφ,
SimpleFunc.measurableSet_preimage, ← preimage_comp, SimpleFunc.coe_comp]
refine (Finset.sum_subset (SimpleFunc.range_comp_subset_range _ hφ) fun y _ hy => ?_).symm
rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range, ← Set.preimage_singleton_eq_empty, SimpleFunc.coe_comp] at hy
rw [hy]
simp
#align measure_theory.integral_map_of_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.integral_map_of_stronglyMeasurable
theorem integral_map {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {φ : α → β} (hφ : AEMeasurable φ μ) {f : β → G}
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f (Measure.map φ μ)) :
∫ y, f y ∂Measure.map φ μ = ∫ x, f (φ x) ∂μ :=
let g := hfm.mk f
calc
∫ y, f y ∂Measure.map φ μ = ∫ y, g y ∂Measure.map φ μ := integral_congr_ae hfm.ae_eq_mk
_ = ∫ y, g y ∂Measure.map (hφ.mk φ) μ := by congr 1; exact Measure.map_congr hφ.ae_eq_mk
_ = ∫ x, g (hφ.mk φ x) ∂μ :=
(integral_map_of_stronglyMeasurable hφ.measurable_mk hfm.stronglyMeasurable_mk)
_ = ∫ x, g (φ x) ∂μ := integral_congr_ae (hφ.ae_eq_mk.symm.fun_comp _)
_ = ∫ x, f (φ x) ∂μ := integral_congr_ae <| ae_eq_comp hφ hfm.ae_eq_mk.symm
#align measure_theory.integral_map MeasureTheory.integral_map
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integral_map {β} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
(hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) (g : β → G) : ∫ y, g y ∂Measure.map f μ = ∫ x, g (f x) ∂μ := by
by_cases hgm : AEStronglyMeasurable g (Measure.map f μ)
· exact MeasureTheory.integral_map hf.measurable.aemeasurable hgm
· rw [integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable hgm, integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable]
exact fun hgf => hgm (hf.aestronglyMeasurable_map_iff.2 hgf)
#align measurable_embedding.integral_map MeasurableEmbedding.integral_map
theorem _root_.ClosedEmbedding.integral_map {β} [TopologicalSpace α] [BorelSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {φ : α → β} (hφ : ClosedEmbedding φ)
(f : β → G) : ∫ y, f y ∂Measure.map φ μ = ∫ x, f (φ x) ∂μ :=
hφ.measurableEmbedding.integral_map _
#align closed_embedding.integral_map ClosedEmbedding.integral_map
theorem integral_map_equiv {β} [MeasurableSpace β] (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (f : β → G) :
∫ y, f y ∂Measure.map e μ = ∫ x, f (e x) ∂μ :=
e.measurableEmbedding.integral_map f
#align measure_theory.integral_map_equiv MeasureTheory.integral_map_equiv
theorem MeasurePreserving.integral_comp {β} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} {ν}
(h₁ : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) (h₂ : MeasurableEmbedding f) (g : β → G) :
∫ x, g (f x) ∂μ = ∫ y, g y ∂ν :=
h₁.map_eq ▸ (h₂.integral_map g).symm
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving.integral_comp MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.integral_comp
theorem MeasurePreserving.integral_comp' {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {ν} {f : α ≃ᵐ β}
(h : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) (g : β → G) :
∫ x, g (f x) ∂μ = ∫ y, g y ∂ν := MeasurePreserving.integral_comp h f.measurableEmbedding _
theorem integral_subtype_comap {α} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α → G) :
∫ x : s, f (x : α) ∂(Measure.comap Subtype.val μ) = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← map_comap_subtype_coe hs]
exact ((MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).integral_map _).symm
attribute [local instance] Measure.Subtype.measureSpace in
theorem integral_subtype {α} [MeasureSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α → G) :
∫ x : s, f x = ∫ x in s, f x := integral_subtype_comap hs f
#align measure_theory.set_integral_eq_subtype MeasureTheory.integral_subtype
@[simp]
theorem integral_dirac' [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → E) (a : α) (hfm : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∫ x, f x ∂Measure.dirac a = f a := by
borelize E
calc
∫ x, f x ∂Measure.dirac a = ∫ _, f a ∂Measure.dirac a :=
integral_congr_ae <| ae_eq_dirac' hfm.measurable
_ = f a := by simp [Measure.dirac_apply_of_mem]
#align measure_theory.integral_dirac' MeasureTheory.integral_dirac'
@[simp]
theorem integral_dirac [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → E) (a : α) :
∫ x, f x ∂Measure.dirac a = f a :=
calc
∫ x, f x ∂Measure.dirac a = ∫ _, f a ∂Measure.dirac a := integral_congr_ae <| ae_eq_dirac f
_ = f a := by simp [Measure.dirac_apply_of_mem]
#align measure_theory.integral_dirac MeasureTheory.integral_dirac
theorem setIntegral_dirac' {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (a : α)
{s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) [Decidable (a ∈ s)] :
∫ x in s, f x ∂Measure.dirac a = if a ∈ s then f a else 0 := by
rw [restrict_dirac' hs]
split_ifs
· exact integral_dirac' _ _ hf
· exact integral_zero_measure _
#align measure_theory.set_integral_dirac' MeasureTheory.setIntegral_dirac'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_dirac' := setIntegral_dirac'
theorem setIntegral_dirac [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → E) (a : α)
(s : Set α) [Decidable (a ∈ s)] :
∫ x in s, f x ∂Measure.dirac a = if a ∈ s then f a else 0 := by
rw [restrict_dirac]
split_ifs
· exact integral_dirac _ _
· exact integral_zero_measure _
#align measure_theory.set_integral_dirac MeasureTheory.setIntegral_dirac
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_dirac := setIntegral_dirac
/-- **Markov's inequality** also known as **Chebyshev's first inequality**. -/
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_integral_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f)
(hf_int : Integrable f μ) (ε : ℝ) : ε * (μ { x | ε ≤ f x }).toReal ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
cases' eq_top_or_lt_top (μ {x | ε ≤ f x}) with hμ hμ
· simpa [hμ] using integral_nonneg_of_ae hf_nonneg
· have := Fact.mk hμ
calc
ε * (μ { x | ε ≤ f x }).toReal = ∫ _ in {x | ε ≤ f x}, ε ∂μ := by simp [mul_comm]
_ ≤ ∫ x in {x | ε ≤ f x}, f x ∂μ :=
integral_mono_ae (integrable_const _) (hf_int.mono_measure μ.restrict_le_self) <|
ae_restrict_mem₀ <| hf_int.aemeasurable.nullMeasurable measurableSet_Ici
_ ≤ _ := integral_mono_measure μ.restrict_le_self hf_nonneg hf_int
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_integral_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_integral_of_nonneg
/-- Hölder's inequality for the integral of a product of norms. The integral of the product of two
norms of functions is bounded by the product of their `ℒp` and `ℒq` seminorms when `p` and `q` are
conjugate exponents. -/
theorem integral_mul_norm_le_Lp_mul_Lq {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f g : α → E} {p q : ℝ}
(hpq : p.IsConjExponent q) (hf : Memℒp f (ENNReal.ofReal p) μ)
(hg : Memℒp g (ENNReal.ofReal q) μ) :
∫ a, ‖f a‖ * ‖g a‖ ∂μ ≤ (∫ a, ‖f a‖ ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) * (∫ a, ‖g a‖ ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
-- translate the Bochner integrals into Lebesgue integrals.
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae, integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae,
integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae]
rotate_left
· exact eventually_of_forall fun x => Real.rpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _
· exact (hg.1.norm.aemeasurable.pow aemeasurable_const).aestronglyMeasurable
· exact eventually_of_forall fun x => Real.rpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _
· exact (hf.1.norm.aemeasurable.pow aemeasurable_const).aestronglyMeasurable
· exact eventually_of_forall fun x => mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)
· exact hf.1.norm.mul hg.1.norm
rw [ENNReal.toReal_rpow, ENNReal.toReal_rpow, ← ENNReal.toReal_mul]
-- replace norms by nnnorm
have h_left : ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (‖f a‖ * ‖g a‖) ∂μ =
∫⁻ a, ((fun x => (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) * fun x => (‖g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [Pi.mul_apply, ← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_mul (norm_nonneg _)]
have h_right_f : ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (‖f a‖ ^ p) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_congr fun x => ?_
rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) hpq.nonneg]
have h_right_g : ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (‖g a‖ ^ q) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, (‖g a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_congr fun x => ?_
rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) hpq.symm.nonneg]
rw [h_left, h_right_f, h_right_g]
-- we can now apply `ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` (up to the `toReal` application)
refine ENNReal.toReal_mono ?_ ?_
· refine ENNReal.mul_ne_top ?_ ?_
· convert hf.snorm_ne_top
rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm]
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal hpq.nonneg]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le]
exact hpq.pos
· exact ENNReal.coe_ne_top
· convert hg.snorm_ne_top
rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm]
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal hpq.symm.nonneg]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le]
exact hpq.symm.pos
· exact ENNReal.coe_ne_top
· exact ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq μ hpq hf.1.nnnorm.aemeasurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal
hg.1.nnnorm.aemeasurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.integral_mul_norm_le_Lp_mul_Lq MeasureTheory.integral_mul_norm_le_Lp_mul_Lq
/-- Hölder's inequality for functions `α → ℝ`. The integral of the product of two nonnegative
functions is bounded by the product of their `ℒp` and `ℒq` seminorms when `p` and `q` are conjugate
exponents. -/
theorem integral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_nonneg {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.IsConjExponent q) {f g : α → ℝ}
(hf_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hg_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (hf : Memℒp f (ENNReal.ofReal p) μ)
(hg : Memℒp g (ENNReal.ofReal q) μ) :
∫ a, f a * g a ∂μ ≤ (∫ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) * (∫ a, g a ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
have h_left : ∫ a, f a * g a ∂μ = ∫ a, ‖f a‖ * ‖g a‖ ∂μ := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hf_nonneg, hg_nonneg] with x hxf hxg
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg hxf, Real.norm_of_nonneg hxg]
have h_right_f : ∫ a, f a ^ p ∂μ = ∫ a, ‖f a‖ ^ p ∂μ := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hf_nonneg] with x hxf
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg hxf]
have h_right_g : ∫ a, g a ^ q ∂μ = ∫ a, ‖g a‖ ^ q ∂μ := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hg_nonneg] with x hxg
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg hxg]
rw [h_left, h_right_f, h_right_g]
exact integral_mul_norm_le_Lp_mul_Lq hpq hf hg
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.integral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_nonneg
theorem integral_countable' [Countable α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {μ : Measure α}
{f : α → E} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∑' a, (μ {a}).toReal • f a := by
rw [← Measure.sum_smul_dirac μ] at hf
rw [← Measure.sum_smul_dirac μ, integral_sum_measure hf]
congr 1 with a : 1
rw [integral_smul_measure, integral_dirac, Measure.sum_smul_dirac]
theorem integral_singleton' {μ : Measure α} {f : α → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (a : α) :
∫ a in {a}, f a ∂μ = (μ {a}).toReal • f a := by
simp only [Measure.restrict_singleton, integral_smul_measure, integral_dirac' f a hf, smul_eq_mul,
mul_comm]
theorem integral_singleton [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {μ : Measure α} (f : α → E) (a : α) :
∫ a in {a}, f a ∂μ = (μ {a}).toReal • f a := by
simp only [Measure.restrict_singleton, integral_smul_measure, integral_dirac, smul_eq_mul,
mul_comm]
theorem integral_countable [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → E) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hf : Integrable f (μ.restrict s)) :
∫ a in s, f a ∂μ = ∑' a : s, (μ {(a : α)}).toReal • f a := by
have hi : Countable { x // x ∈ s } := Iff.mpr countable_coe_iff hs
have hf' : Integrable (fun (x : s) => f x) (Measure.comap Subtype.val μ) := by
rw [← map_comap_subtype_coe, integrable_map_measure] at hf
· apply hf
· exact Integrable.aestronglyMeasurable hf
· exact Measurable.aemeasurable measurable_subtype_coe
· exact Countable.measurableSet hs
rw [← integral_subtype_comap hs.measurableSet, integral_countable' hf']
congr 1 with a : 1
rw [Measure.comap_apply Subtype.val Subtype.coe_injective
(fun s' hs' => MeasurableSet.subtype_image (Countable.measurableSet hs) hs') _
(MeasurableSet.singleton a)]
simp
theorem integral_finset [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → E)
(hf : Integrable f (μ.restrict s)) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∑ x ∈ s, (μ {x}).toReal • f x := by
rw [integral_countable _ s.countable_toSet hf, ← Finset.tsum_subtype']
theorem integral_fintype [MeasurableSingletonClass α] [Fintype α] (f : α → E)
(hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∑ x, (μ {x}).toReal • f x := by
-- NB: Integrable f does not follow from Fintype, because the measure itself could be non-finite
rw [← integral_finset .univ, Finset.coe_univ, Measure.restrict_univ]
simp only [Finset.coe_univ, Measure.restrict_univ, hf]
theorem integral_unique [Unique α] (f : α → E) : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = (μ univ).toReal • f default :=
calc
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ _, f default ∂μ := by congr with x; congr; exact Unique.uniq _ x
_ = (μ univ).toReal • f default := by rw [integral_const]
theorem integral_pos_of_integrable_nonneg_nonzero [TopologicalSpace α] [Measure.IsOpenPosMeasure μ]
{f : α → ℝ} {x : α} (f_cont : Continuous f) (f_int : Integrable f μ) (f_nonneg : 0 ≤ f)
(f_x : f x ≠ 0) : 0 < ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
(integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg f_nonneg f_int).2
(IsOpen.measure_pos μ f_cont.isOpen_support ⟨x, f_x⟩)
end Properties
section IntegralTrim
variable {H β γ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H] {m m0 : MeasurableSpace β} {μ : Measure β}
/-- Simple function seen as simple function of a larger `MeasurableSpace`. -/
def SimpleFunc.toLargerSpace (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : @SimpleFunc β m γ) : SimpleFunc β γ :=
⟨@SimpleFunc.toFun β m γ f, fun x => hm _ (@SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber β γ m f x),
@SimpleFunc.finite_range β γ m f⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.to_larger_space MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.toLargerSpace
theorem SimpleFunc.coe_toLargerSpace_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : @SimpleFunc β m γ) :
⇑(f.toLargerSpace hm) = f := rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_to_larger_space_eq MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_toLargerSpace_eq
theorem integral_simpleFunc_larger_space (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : @SimpleFunc β m F)
(hf_int : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∑ x ∈ @SimpleFunc.range β F m f, ENNReal.toReal (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})) • x := by
simp_rw [← f.coe_toLargerSpace_eq hm]
have hf_int : Integrable (f.toLargerSpace hm) μ := by rwa [SimpleFunc.coe_toLargerSpace_eq]
rw [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum _ hf_int]
congr 1
#align measure_theory.integral_simple_func_larger_space MeasureTheory.integral_simpleFunc_larger_space
theorem integral_trim_simpleFunc (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : @SimpleFunc β m F) (hf_int : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ.trim hm := by
have hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f := @SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable β F m _ f
have hf_int_m := hf_int.trim hm hf
rw [integral_simpleFunc_larger_space (le_refl m) f hf_int_m,
integral_simpleFunc_larger_space hm f hf_int]
congr with x
congr 2
exact (trim_measurableSet_eq hm (@SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber β F m f x)).symm
#align measure_theory.integral_trim_simple_func MeasureTheory.integral_trim_simpleFunc
theorem integral_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : β → G} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ.trim hm := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G; swap
· simp [integral, hG]
borelize G
by_cases hf_int : Integrable f μ
swap
· have hf_int_m : ¬Integrable f (μ.trim hm) := fun hf_int_m =>
hf_int (integrable_of_integrable_trim hm hf_int_m)
rw [integral_undef hf_int, integral_undef hf_int_m]
haveI : SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set G) := hf.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
let f_seq := @SimpleFunc.approxOn G β _ _ _ m _ hf.measurable (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) _
have hf_seq_meas : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable[m] (f_seq n) := fun n =>
@SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable β G m _ (f_seq n)
have hf_seq_int : ∀ n, Integrable (f_seq n) μ :=
SimpleFunc.integrable_approxOn_range (hf.mono hm).measurable hf_int
have hf_seq_int_m : ∀ n, Integrable (f_seq n) (μ.trim hm) := fun n =>
(hf_seq_int n).trim hm (hf_seq_meas n)
have hf_seq_eq : ∀ n, ∫ x, f_seq n x ∂μ = ∫ x, f_seq n x ∂μ.trim hm := fun n =>
integral_trim_simpleFunc hm (f_seq n) (hf_seq_int n)
have h_lim_1 : atTop.Tendsto (fun n => ∫ x, f_seq n x ∂μ) (𝓝 (∫ x, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_integral_of_L1 f hf_int (eventually_of_forall hf_seq_int) ?_
exact SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn_range_L1_nnnorm (hf.mono hm).measurable hf_int
have h_lim_2 : atTop.Tendsto (fun n => ∫ x, f_seq n x ∂μ) (𝓝 (∫ x, f x ∂μ.trim hm)) := by
simp_rw [hf_seq_eq]
refine @tendsto_integral_of_L1 β G _ _ m (μ.trim hm) _ f (hf_int.trim hm hf) _ _
(eventually_of_forall hf_seq_int_m) ?_
exact @SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn_range_L1_nnnorm β G m _ _ _ f _ _ hf.measurable
(hf_int.trim hm hf)
exact tendsto_nhds_unique h_lim_1 h_lim_2
#align measure_theory.integral_trim MeasureTheory.integral_trim
theorem integral_trim_ae (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : β → G} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.trim hm)) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ.trim hm := by
rw [integral_congr_ae (ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim hf.ae_eq_mk), integral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk]
exact integral_trim hm hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk
#align measure_theory.integral_trim_ae MeasureTheory.integral_trim_ae
theorem ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace γ] [MetrizableSpace γ] (hm : m ≤ m0)
{f g : β → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g)
(hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g := by
rwa [EventuallyEq, ae_iff, trim_measurableSet_eq hm]
exact (hf.measurableSet_eq_fun hg).compl
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_trim_of_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable
theorem ae_eq_trim_iff [TopologicalSpace γ] [MetrizableSpace γ] (hm : m ≤ m0) {f g : β → γ}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim, ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm hf hg⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_trim_iff MeasureTheory.ae_eq_trim_iff
theorem ae_le_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable [LinearOrder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ]
[OrderClosedTopology γ] [PseudoMetrizableSpace γ] (hm : m ≤ m0) {f g : β → γ}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
f ≤ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g := by
rwa [EventuallyLE, ae_iff, trim_measurableSet_eq hm]
exact (hf.measurableSet_le hg).compl
#align measure_theory.ae_le_trim_of_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.ae_le_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable
theorem ae_le_trim_iff [LinearOrder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderClosedTopology γ]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace γ] (hm : m ≤ m0) {f g : β → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) : f ≤ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g ↔ f ≤ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨ae_le_of_ae_le_trim, ae_le_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm hf hg⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_le_trim_iff MeasureTheory.ae_le_trim_iff
end IntegralTrim
section SnormBound
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Bochner.lean | 2,048 | 2,092 | theorem snorm_one_le_of_le {r : ℝ≥0} {f : α → ℝ} (hfint : Integrable f μ) (hfint' : 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ)
(hf : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, f ω ≤ r) : snorm f 1 μ ≤ 2 * μ Set.univ * r := by |
by_cases hr : r = 0
· suffices f =ᵐ[μ] 0 by
rw [snorm_congr_ae this, snorm_zero, hr, ENNReal.coe_zero, mul_zero]
rw [hr] at hf
norm_cast at hf
-- Porting note: two lines above were
--rw [hr, Nonneg.coe_zero] at hf
have hnegf : ∫ x, -f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [integral_neg, neg_eq_zero]
exact le_antisymm (integral_nonpos_of_ae hf) hfint'
have := (integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae ?_ hfint.neg).1 hnegf
· filter_upwards [this] with ω hω
rwa [Pi.neg_apply, Pi.zero_apply, neg_eq_zero] at hω
· filter_upwards [hf] with ω hω
rwa [Pi.zero_apply, Pi.neg_apply, Right.nonneg_neg_iff]
by_cases hμ : IsFiniteMeasure μ
swap
· have : μ Set.univ = ∞ := by
by_contra hμ'
exact hμ (IsFiniteMeasure.mk <| lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hμ')
rw [this, ENNReal.mul_top', if_neg, ENNReal.top_mul', if_neg]
· exact le_top
· simp [hr]
· norm_num
haveI := hμ
rw [integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part hfint, sub_nonneg] at hfint'
have hposbdd : ∫ ω, max (f ω) 0 ∂μ ≤ (μ Set.univ).toReal • (r : ℝ) := by
rw [← integral_const]
refine integral_mono_ae hfint.real_toNNReal (integrable_const (r : ℝ)) ?_
filter_upwards [hf] with ω hω using Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe.2 hω
rw [Memℒp.snorm_eq_integral_rpow_norm one_ne_zero ENNReal.one_ne_top
(memℒp_one_iff_integrable.2 hfint),
ENNReal.ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal
(ENNReal.mul_ne_top (ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.two_ne_top <| @measure_ne_top _ _ _ hμ _)
ENNReal.coe_ne_top)]
simp_rw [ENNReal.one_toReal, _root_.inv_one, Real.rpow_one, Real.norm_eq_abs, ←
max_zero_add_max_neg_zero_eq_abs_self, ← Real.coe_toNNReal']
rw [integral_add hfint.real_toNNReal]
· simp only [Real.coe_toNNReal', ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.one_toReal, ENNReal.coe_toReal,
ge_iff_le, Left.nonneg_neg_iff, Left.neg_nonpos_iff, toReal_ofNat] at hfint' ⊢
refine (add_le_add_left hfint' _).trans ?_
rwa [← two_mul, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left (two_pos : (0 : ℝ) < 2)]
· exact hfint.neg.sup (integrable_zero _ _ μ)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Semiconj.Units
import Mathlib.Init.Classical
#align_import algebra.group_with_zero.semiconj from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70d50ecfd4900dd6d328da39ab7ebd516abe4025"
/-!
# Lemmas about semiconjugate elements in a `GroupWithZero`.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
variable {α M₀ G₀ M₀' G₀' F F' : Type*}
namespace SemiconjBy
@[simp]
theorem zero_right [MulZeroClass G₀] (a : G₀) : SemiconjBy a 0 0 := by
simp only [SemiconjBy, mul_zero, zero_mul]
#align semiconj_by.zero_right SemiconjBy.zero_right
@[simp]
theorem zero_left [MulZeroClass G₀] (x y : G₀) : SemiconjBy 0 x y := by
simp only [SemiconjBy, mul_zero, zero_mul]
#align semiconj_by.zero_left SemiconjBy.zero_left
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a x y x' y' : G₀}
@[simp]
theorem inv_symm_left_iff₀ : SemiconjBy a⁻¹ x y ↔ SemiconjBy a y x :=
Classical.by_cases (fun ha : a = 0 => by simp only [ha, inv_zero, SemiconjBy.zero_left]) fun ha =>
@units_inv_symm_left_iff _ _ (Units.mk0 a ha) _ _
#align semiconj_by.inv_symm_left_iff₀ SemiconjBy.inv_symm_left_iff₀
theorem inv_symm_left₀ (h : SemiconjBy a x y) : SemiconjBy a⁻¹ y x :=
SemiconjBy.inv_symm_left_iff₀.2 h
#align semiconj_by.inv_symm_left₀ SemiconjBy.inv_symm_left₀
theorem inv_right₀ (h : SemiconjBy a x y) : SemiconjBy a x⁻¹ y⁻¹ := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp only [ha, zero_left]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· subst x
simp only [SemiconjBy, mul_zero, @eq_comm _ _ (y * a), mul_eq_zero] at h
simp [h.resolve_right ha]
· have := mul_ne_zero ha hx
rw [h.eq, mul_ne_zero_iff] at this
exact @units_inv_right _ _ _ (Units.mk0 x hx) (Units.mk0 y this.1) h
#align semiconj_by.inv_right₀ SemiconjBy.inv_right₀
@[simp]
theorem inv_right_iff₀ : SemiconjBy a x⁻¹ y⁻¹ ↔ SemiconjBy a x y :=
⟨fun h => inv_inv x ▸ inv_inv y ▸ h.inv_right₀, inv_right₀⟩
#align semiconj_by.inv_right_iff₀ SemiconjBy.inv_right_iff₀
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Semiconj.lean | 62 | 65 | theorem div_right (h : SemiconjBy a x y) (h' : SemiconjBy a x' y') :
SemiconjBy a (x / x') (y / y') := by |
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv]
exact h.mul_right h'.inv_right₀
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.PID
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.FundamentalDomain
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Module
#align_import algebra.module.zlattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a3e83f0fa4391c8740f7d773a7a9b74e311ae2a3"
/-!
# ℤ-lattices
Let `E` be a finite dimensional vector space over a `NormedLinearOrderedField` `K` with a solid
norm that is also a `FloorRing`, e.g. `ℝ`. A (full) `ℤ`-lattice `L` of `E` is a discrete
subgroup of `E` such that `L` spans `E` over `K`.
A `ℤ`-lattice `L` can be defined in two ways:
* For `b` a basis of `E`, then `L = Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range b)` is a ℤ-lattice of `E`
* As an `AddSubgroup E` with the additional properties:
* `DiscreteTopology L`, that is `L` is discrete
* `Submodule.span ℝ (L : Set E) = ⊤`, that is `L` spans `E` over `K`.
Results about the first point of view are in the `Zspan` namespace and results about the second
point of view are in the `Zlattice` namespace.
## Main results
* `Zspan.isAddFundamentalDomain`: for a ℤ-lattice `Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range b)`, proves that
the set defined by `Zspan.fundamentalDomain` is a fundamental domain.
* `Zlattice.module_free`: an AddSubgroup of `E` that is discrete and spans `E` over `K` is a free
`ℤ`-module
* `Zlattice.rank`: an AddSubgroup of `E` that is discrete and spans `E` over `K` is a free
`ℤ`-module of `ℤ`-rank equal to the `K`-rank of `E`
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Zspan
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSet Submodule Bornology
variable {E ι : Type*}
section NormedLatticeField
variable {K : Type*} [NormedLinearOrderedField K]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E]
variable (b : Basis ι K E)
theorem span_top : span K (span ℤ (Set.range b) : Set E) = ⊤ := by simp [span_span_of_tower]
/-- The fundamental domain of the ℤ-lattice spanned by `b`. See `Zspan.isAddFundamentalDomain`
for the proof that it is a fundamental domain. -/
def fundamentalDomain : Set E := {m | ∀ i, b.repr m i ∈ Set.Ico (0 : K) 1}
#align zspan.fundamental_domain Zspan.fundamentalDomain
@[simp]
theorem mem_fundamentalDomain {m : E} :
m ∈ fundamentalDomain b ↔ ∀ i, b.repr m i ∈ Set.Ico (0 : K) 1 := Iff.rfl
#align zspan.mem_fundamental_domain Zspan.mem_fundamentalDomain
theorem map_fundamentalDomain {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace K F] (f : E ≃ₗ[K] F) :
f '' (fundamentalDomain b) = fundamentalDomain (b.map f) := by
ext x
rw [mem_fundamentalDomain, Basis.map_repr, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, ← mem_fundamentalDomain,
show f.symm x = f.toEquiv.symm x by rfl, ← Set.mem_image_equiv]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fundamentalDomain_reindex {ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι') :
fundamentalDomain (b.reindex e) = fundamentalDomain b := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_fundamentalDomain, Basis.repr_reindex_apply]
rw [Equiv.forall_congr' e]
simp_rw [implies_true]
lemma fundamentalDomain_pi_basisFun [Fintype ι] :
fundamentalDomain (Pi.basisFun ℝ ι) = Set.pi Set.univ fun _ : ι ↦ Set.Ico (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
ext; simp
variable [FloorRing K]
section Fintype
variable [Fintype ι]
/-- The map that sends a vector of `E` to the element of the ℤ-lattice spanned by `b` obtained
by rounding down its coordinates on the basis `b`. -/
def floor (m : E) : span ℤ (Set.range b) := ∑ i, ⌊b.repr m i⌋ • b.restrictScalars ℤ i
#align zspan.floor Zspan.floor
/-- The map that sends a vector of `E` to the element of the ℤ-lattice spanned by `b` obtained
by rounding up its coordinates on the basis `b`. -/
def ceil (m : E) : span ℤ (Set.range b) := ∑ i, ⌈b.repr m i⌉ • b.restrictScalars ℤ i
#align zspan.ceil Zspan.ceil
@[simp]
theorem repr_floor_apply (m : E) (i : ι) : b.repr (floor b m) i = ⌊b.repr m i⌋ := by
classical simp only [floor, zsmul_eq_smul_cast K, b.repr.map_smul, Finsupp.single_apply,
Finset.sum_apply', Basis.repr_self, Finsupp.smul_single', mul_one, Finset.sum_ite_eq', coe_sum,
Finset.mem_univ, if_true, coe_smul_of_tower, Basis.restrictScalars_apply, map_sum]
#align zspan.repr_floor_apply Zspan.repr_floor_apply
@[simp]
theorem repr_ceil_apply (m : E) (i : ι) : b.repr (ceil b m) i = ⌈b.repr m i⌉ := by
classical simp only [ceil, zsmul_eq_smul_cast K, b.repr.map_smul, Finsupp.single_apply,
Finset.sum_apply', Basis.repr_self, Finsupp.smul_single', mul_one, Finset.sum_ite_eq', coe_sum,
Finset.mem_univ, if_true, coe_smul_of_tower, Basis.restrictScalars_apply, map_sum]
#align zspan.repr_ceil_apply Zspan.repr_ceil_apply
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_self_of_mem (m : E) (h : m ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) : (floor b m : E) = m := by
apply b.ext_elem
simp_rw [repr_floor_apply b]
intro i
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := (b.mem_span_iff_repr_mem ℤ _).mp h i
rw [← hz]
exact congr_arg (Int.cast : ℤ → K) (Int.floor_intCast z)
#align zspan.floor_eq_self_of_mem Zspan.floor_eq_self_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem ceil_eq_self_of_mem (m : E) (h : m ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) : (ceil b m : E) = m := by
apply b.ext_elem
simp_rw [repr_ceil_apply b]
intro i
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := (b.mem_span_iff_repr_mem ℤ _).mp h i
rw [← hz]
exact congr_arg (Int.cast : ℤ → K) (Int.ceil_intCast z)
#align zspan.ceil_eq_self_of_mem Zspan.ceil_eq_self_of_mem
/-- The map that sends a vector `E` to the `fundamentalDomain` of the lattice,
see `Zspan.fract_mem_fundamentalDomain`, and `fractRestrict` for the map with the codomain
restricted to `fundamentalDomain`. -/
def fract (m : E) : E := m - floor b m
#align zspan.fract Zspan.fract
theorem fract_apply (m : E) : fract b m = m - floor b m := rfl
#align zspan.fract_apply Zspan.fract_apply
@[simp]
theorem repr_fract_apply (m : E) (i : ι) : b.repr (fract b m) i = Int.fract (b.repr m i) := by
rw [fract, map_sub, Finsupp.coe_sub, Pi.sub_apply, repr_floor_apply, Int.fract]
#align zspan.repr_fract_apply Zspan.repr_fract_apply
@[simp]
theorem fract_fract (m : E) : fract b (fract b m) = fract b m :=
Basis.ext_elem b fun _ => by classical simp only [repr_fract_apply, Int.fract_fract]
#align zspan.fract_fract Zspan.fract_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_zspan_add (m : E) {v : E} (h : v ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) :
fract b (v + m) = fract b m := by
classical
refine (Basis.ext_elem_iff b).mpr fun i => ?_
simp_rw [repr_fract_apply, Int.fract_eq_fract]
use (b.restrictScalars ℤ).repr ⟨v, h⟩ i
rw [map_add, Finsupp.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, add_tsub_cancel_right,
← eq_intCast (algebraMap ℤ K) _, Basis.restrictScalars_repr_apply, coe_mk]
#align zspan.fract_zspan_add Zspan.fract_zspan_add
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_zspan (m : E) {v : E} (h : v ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) :
fract b (m + v) = fract b m := by rw [add_comm, fract_zspan_add b m h]
#align zspan.fract_add_zspan Zspan.fract_add_zspan
variable {b}
theorem fract_eq_self {x : E} : fract b x = x ↔ x ∈ fundamentalDomain b := by
classical simp only [Basis.ext_elem_iff b, repr_fract_apply, Int.fract_eq_self,
mem_fundamentalDomain, Set.mem_Ico]
#align zspan.fract_eq_self Zspan.fract_eq_self
variable (b)
theorem fract_mem_fundamentalDomain (x : E) : fract b x ∈ fundamentalDomain b :=
fract_eq_self.mp (fract_fract b _)
#align zspan.fract_mem_fundamental_domain Zspan.fract_mem_fundamentalDomain
/-- The map `fract` with codomain restricted to `fundamentalDomain`. -/
def fractRestrict (x : E) : fundamentalDomain b := ⟨fract b x, fract_mem_fundamentalDomain b x⟩
theorem fractRestrict_surjective : Function.Surjective (fractRestrict b) :=
fun x => ⟨↑x, Subtype.eq (fract_eq_self.mpr (Subtype.mem x))⟩
@[simp]
theorem fractRestrict_apply (x : E) : (fractRestrict b x : E) = fract b x := rfl
theorem fract_eq_fract (m n : E) : fract b m = fract b n ↔ -m + n ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b) := by
classical
rw [eq_comm, Basis.ext_elem_iff b]
simp_rw [repr_fract_apply, Int.fract_eq_fract, eq_comm, Basis.mem_span_iff_repr_mem,
sub_eq_neg_add, map_add, map_neg, Finsupp.coe_add, Finsupp.coe_neg, Pi.add_apply,
Pi.neg_apply, ← eq_intCast (algebraMap ℤ K) _, Set.mem_range]
#align zspan.fract_eq_fract Zspan.fract_eq_fract
theorem norm_fract_le [HasSolidNorm K] (m : E) : ‖fract b m‖ ≤ ∑ i, ‖b i‖ := by
classical
calc
‖fract b m‖ = ‖∑ i, b.repr (fract b m) i • b i‖ := by rw [b.sum_repr]
_ = ‖∑ i, Int.fract (b.repr m i) • b i‖ := by simp_rw [repr_fract_apply]
_ ≤ ∑ i, ‖Int.fract (b.repr m i) • b i‖ := norm_sum_le _ _
_ = ∑ i, ‖Int.fract (b.repr m i)‖ * ‖b i‖ := by simp_rw [norm_smul]
_ ≤ ∑ i, ‖b i‖ := Finset.sum_le_sum fun i _ => ?_
suffices ‖Int.fract ((b.repr m) i)‖ ≤ 1 by
convert mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right this (norm_nonneg _ : 0 ≤ ‖b i‖)
exact (one_mul _).symm
rw [(norm_one.symm : 1 = ‖(1 : K)‖)]
apply norm_le_norm_of_abs_le_abs
rw [abs_one, Int.abs_fract]
exact le_of_lt (Int.fract_lt_one _)
#align zspan.norm_fract_le Zspan.norm_fract_le
section Unique
variable [Unique ι]
@[simp]
theorem coe_floor_self (k : K) : (floor (Basis.singleton ι K) k : K) = ⌊k⌋ :=
Basis.ext_elem _ fun _ => by rw [repr_floor_apply, Basis.singleton_repr, Basis.singleton_repr]
#align zspan.coe_floor_self Zspan.coe_floor_self
@[simp]
theorem coe_fract_self (k : K) : (fract (Basis.singleton ι K) k : K) = Int.fract k :=
Basis.ext_elem _ fun _ => by rw [repr_fract_apply, Basis.singleton_repr, Basis.singleton_repr]
#align zspan.coe_fract_self Zspan.coe_fract_self
end Unique
end Fintype
theorem fundamentalDomain_isBounded [Finite ι] [HasSolidNorm K] :
IsBounded (fundamentalDomain b) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
refine isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le.2 ⟨∑ j, ‖b j‖, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← fract_eq_self.mpr hx]
apply norm_fract_le
#align zspan.fundamental_domain_bounded Zspan.fundamentalDomain_isBounded
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Zlattice/Basic.lean | 243 | 247 | theorem vadd_mem_fundamentalDomain [Fintype ι] (y : span ℤ (Set.range b)) (x : E) :
y +ᵥ x ∈ fundamentalDomain b ↔ y = -floor b x := by |
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, ← add_right_inj x, NegMemClass.coe_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ← fract_apply,
← fract_zspan_add b _ (Subtype.mem y), add_comm, ← vadd_eq_add, ← vadd_def, eq_comm, ←
fract_eq_self]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.SimplicialObject
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Products
#align_import algebraic_topology.split_simplicial_object from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dd1f8496baa505636a82748e6b652165ea888733"
/-!
# Split simplicial objects
In this file, we introduce the notion of split simplicial object.
If `C` is a category that has finite coproducts, a splitting
`s : Splitting X` of a simplicial object `X` in `C` consists
of the datum of a sequence of objects `s.N : ℕ → C` (which
we shall refer to as "nondegenerate simplices") and a
sequence of morphisms `s.ι n : s.N n → X _[n]` that have
the property that a certain canonical map identifies `X _[n]`
with the coproduct of objects `s.N i` indexed by all possible
epimorphisms `[n] ⟶ [i]` in `SimplexCategory`. (We do not
assume that the morphisms `s.ι n` are monomorphisms: in the
most common categories, this would be a consequence of the
axioms.)
Simplicial objects equipped with a splitting form a category
`SimplicialObject.Split C`.
## References
* [Stacks: Splitting simplicial objects] https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/017O
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite SimplexCategory
open Simplicial
universe u
variable {C : Type*} [Category C]
namespace SimplicialObject
namespace Splitting
/-- The index set which appears in the definition of split simplicial objects. -/
def IndexSet (Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) :=
ΣΔ' : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ, { α : Δ.unop ⟶ Δ'.unop // Epi α }
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet
namespace IndexSet
/-- The element in `Splitting.IndexSet Δ` attached to an epimorphism `f : Δ ⟶ Δ'`. -/
@[simps]
def mk {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategory} (f : Δ ⟶ Δ') [Epi f] : IndexSet (op Δ) :=
⟨op Δ', f, inferInstance⟩
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.mk SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.mk
variable {Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (A : IndexSet Δ)
/-- The epimorphism in `SimplexCategory` associated to `A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ` -/
def e :=
A.2.1
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.e SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.e
instance : Epi A.e :=
A.2.2
theorem ext' : A = ⟨A.1, ⟨A.e, A.2.2⟩⟩ := rfl
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.ext' SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.ext'
theorem ext (A₁ A₂ : IndexSet Δ) (h₁ : A₁.1 = A₂.1) (h₂ : A₁.e ≫ eqToHom (by rw [h₁]) = A₂.e) :
A₁ = A₂ := by
rcases A₁ with ⟨Δ₁, ⟨α₁, hα₁⟩⟩
rcases A₂ with ⟨Δ₂, ⟨α₂, hα₂⟩⟩
simp only at h₁
subst h₁
simp only [eqToHom_refl, comp_id, IndexSet.e] at h₂
simp only [h₂]
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.ext SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.ext
instance : Fintype (IndexSet Δ) :=
Fintype.ofInjective
(fun A =>
⟨⟨A.1.unop.len, Nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr (len_le_of_epi (inferInstance : Epi A.e))⟩,
A.e.toOrderHom⟩ :
IndexSet Δ → Sigma fun k : Fin (Δ.unop.len + 1) => Fin (Δ.unop.len + 1) → Fin (k + 1))
(by
rintro ⟨Δ₁, α₁⟩ ⟨Δ₂, α₂⟩ h₁
induction' Δ₁ using Opposite.rec with Δ₁
induction' Δ₂ using Opposite.rec with Δ₂
simp only [unop_op, Sigma.mk.inj_iff, Fin.mk.injEq] at h₁
have h₂ : Δ₁ = Δ₂ := by
ext1
simpa only [Fin.mk_eq_mk] using h₁.1
subst h₂
refine ext _ _ rfl ?_
ext : 2
exact eq_of_heq h₁.2)
variable (Δ)
/-- The distinguished element in `Splitting.IndexSet Δ` which corresponds to the
identity of `Δ`. -/
@[simps]
def id : IndexSet Δ :=
⟨Δ, ⟨𝟙 _, by infer_instance⟩⟩
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.id SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.id
instance : Inhabited (IndexSet Δ) :=
⟨id Δ⟩
variable {Δ}
/-- The condition that an element `Splitting.IndexSet Δ` is the distinguished
element `Splitting.IndexSet.Id Δ`. -/
@[simp]
def EqId : Prop :=
A = id _
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.eq_id SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.EqId
theorem eqId_iff_eq : A.EqId ↔ A.1 = Δ := by
constructor
· intro h
dsimp at h
rw [h]
rfl
· intro h
rcases A with ⟨_, ⟨f, hf⟩⟩
simp only at h
subst h
refine ext _ _ rfl ?_
haveI := hf
simp only [eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
exact eq_id_of_epi f
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.eq_id_iff_eq SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.eqId_iff_eq
theorem eqId_iff_len_eq : A.EqId ↔ A.1.unop.len = Δ.unop.len := by
rw [eqId_iff_eq]
constructor
· intro h
rw [h]
· intro h
rw [← unop_inj_iff]
ext
exact h
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.eq_id_iff_len_eq SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.eqId_iff_len_eq
theorem eqId_iff_len_le : A.EqId ↔ Δ.unop.len ≤ A.1.unop.len := by
rw [eqId_iff_len_eq]
constructor
· intro h
rw [h]
· exact le_antisymm (len_le_of_epi (inferInstance : Epi A.e))
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.eq_id_iff_len_le SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.eqId_iff_len_le
theorem eqId_iff_mono : A.EqId ↔ Mono A.e := by
constructor
· intro h
dsimp at h
subst h
dsimp only [id, e]
infer_instance
· intro h
rw [eqId_iff_len_le]
exact len_le_of_mono h
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.eq_id_iff_mono SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.eqId_iff_mono
/-- Given `A : IndexSet Δ₁`, if `p.unop : unop Δ₂ ⟶ unop Δ₁` is an epi, this
is the obvious element in `A : IndexSet Δ₂` associated to the composition
of epimorphisms `p.unop ≫ A.e`. -/
@[simps]
def epiComp {Δ₁ Δ₂ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (A : IndexSet Δ₁) (p : Δ₁ ⟶ Δ₂) [Epi p.unop] :
IndexSet Δ₂ :=
⟨A.1, ⟨p.unop ≫ A.e, epi_comp _ _⟩⟩
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.epi_comp SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.epiComp
variable {Δ' : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (θ : Δ ⟶ Δ')
/-- When `A : IndexSet Δ` and `θ : Δ → Δ'` is a morphism in `SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ`,
an element in `IndexSet Δ'` can be defined by using the epi-mono factorisation
of `θ.unop ≫ A.e`. -/
def pull : IndexSet Δ' :=
mk (factorThruImage (θ.unop ≫ A.e))
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.pull SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.pull
@[reassoc]
theorem fac_pull : (A.pull θ).e ≫ image.ι (θ.unop ≫ A.e) = θ.unop ≫ A.e :=
image.fac _
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.fac_pull SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.fac_pull
end IndexSet
variable (N : ℕ → C) (Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) (X : SimplicialObject C) (φ : ∀ n, N n ⟶ X _[n])
/-- Given a sequences of objects `N : ℕ → C` in a category `C`, this is
a family of objects indexed by the elements `A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ`.
The `Δ`-simplices of a split simplicial objects shall identify to the
coproduct of objects in such a family. -/
@[simp, nolint unusedArguments]
def summand (A : IndexSet Δ) : C :=
N A.1.unop.len
#align simplicial_object.splitting.summand SimplicialObject.Splitting.summand
/-- The cofan for `summand N Δ` induced by morphisms `N n ⟶ X_ [n]` for all `n : ℕ`. -/
def cofan' (Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) : Cofan (summand N Δ) :=
Cofan.mk (X.obj Δ) (fun A => φ A.1.unop.len ≫ X.map A.e.op)
end Splitting
--porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
/-- A splitting of a simplicial object `X` consists of the datum of a sequence
of objects `N`, a sequence of morphisms `ι : N n ⟶ X _[n]` such that
for all `Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ`, the canonical map `Splitting.map X ι Δ`
is an isomorphism. -/
structure Splitting (X : SimplicialObject C) where
/-- The "nondegenerate simplices" `N n` for all `n : ℕ`. -/
N : ℕ → C
/-- The "inclusion" `N n ⟶ X _[n]` for all `n : ℕ`. -/
ι : ∀ n, N n ⟶ X _[n]
/-- For each `Δ`, `X.obj Δ` identifies to the coproduct of the objects `N A.1.unop.len`
for all `A : IndexSet Δ`. -/
isColimit' : ∀ Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ, IsColimit (Splitting.cofan' N X ι Δ)
#align simplicial_object.splitting SimplicialObject.Splitting
namespace Splitting
variable {X Y : SimplicialObject C} (s : Splitting X)
/-- The cofan for `summand s.N Δ` induced by a splitting of a simplicial object. -/
def cofan (Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) : Cofan (summand s.N Δ) :=
Cofan.mk (X.obj Δ) (fun A => s.ι A.1.unop.len ≫ X.map A.e.op)
/-- The cofan `s.cofan Δ` is colimit. -/
def isColimit (Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) : IsColimit (s.cofan Δ) := s.isColimit' Δ
@[reassoc]
theorem cofan_inj_eq {Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (A : IndexSet Δ) :
(s.cofan Δ).inj A = s.ι A.1.unop.len ≫ X.map A.e.op := rfl
#align simplicial_object.splitting.ι_summand_eq SimplicialObject.Splitting.cofan_inj_eq
theorem cofan_inj_id (n : ℕ) : (s.cofan _).inj (IndexSet.id (op [n])) = s.ι n := by
erw [cofan_inj_eq, X.map_id, comp_id]
rfl
#align simplicial_object.splitting.ι_summand_id SimplicialObject.Splitting.cofan_inj_id
/-- As it is stated in `Splitting.hom_ext`, a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` from a split
simplicial object to any simplicial object is determined by its restrictions
`s.φ f n : s.N n ⟶ Y _[n]` to the distinguished summands in each degree `n`. -/
@[simp]
def φ (f : X ⟶ Y) (n : ℕ) : s.N n ⟶ Y _[n] :=
s.ι n ≫ f.app (op [n])
#align simplicial_object.splitting.φ SimplicialObject.Splitting.φ
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem cofan_inj_comp_app (f : X ⟶ Y) {Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (A : IndexSet Δ) :
(s.cofan Δ).inj A ≫ f.app Δ = s.φ f A.1.unop.len ≫ Y.map A.e.op := by
simp only [cofan_inj_eq_assoc, φ, assoc]
erw [NatTrans.naturality]
#align simplicial_object.splitting.ι_summand_comp_app SimplicialObject.Splitting.cofan_inj_comp_app
theorem hom_ext' {Z : C} {Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (f g : X.obj Δ ⟶ Z)
(h : ∀ A : IndexSet Δ, (s.cofan Δ).inj A ≫ f = (s.cofan Δ).inj A ≫ g) : f = g :=
Cofan.IsColimit.hom_ext (s.isColimit Δ) _ _ h
#align simplicial_object.splitting.hom_ext' SimplicialObject.Splitting.hom_ext'
theorem hom_ext (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, s.φ f n = s.φ g n) : f = g := by
ext Δ
apply s.hom_ext'
intro A
induction' Δ using Opposite.rec with Δ
induction' Δ using SimplexCategory.rec with n
dsimp
simp only [s.cofan_inj_comp_app, h]
#align simplicial_object.splitting.hom_ext SimplicialObject.Splitting.hom_ext
/-- The map `X.obj Δ ⟶ Z` obtained by providing a family of morphisms on all the
terms of decomposition given by a splitting `s : Splitting X` -/
def desc {Z : C} (Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) (F : ∀ A : IndexSet Δ, s.N A.1.unop.len ⟶ Z) :
X.obj Δ ⟶ Z :=
Cofan.IsColimit.desc (s.isColimit Δ) F
#align simplicial_object.splitting.desc SimplicialObject.Splitting.desc
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ι_desc {Z : C} (Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) (F : ∀ A : IndexSet Δ, s.N A.1.unop.len ⟶ Z)
(A : IndexSet Δ) : (s.cofan Δ).inj A ≫ s.desc Δ F = F A := by
apply Cofan.IsColimit.fac
#align simplicial_object.splitting.ι_desc SimplicialObject.Splitting.ι_desc
/-- A simplicial object that is isomorphic to a split simplicial object is split. -/
@[simps]
def ofIso (e : X ≅ Y) : Splitting Y where
N := s.N
ι n := s.ι n ≫ e.hom.app (op [n])
isColimit' Δ := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (s.isColimit Δ ) (Cofan.ext (e.app Δ)
(fun A => by simp [cofan, cofan']))
#align simplicial_object.splitting.of_iso SimplicialObject.Splitting.ofIso
@[reassoc]
theorem cofan_inj_epi_naturality {Δ₁ Δ₂ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (A : IndexSet Δ₁) (p : Δ₁ ⟶ Δ₂)
[Epi p.unop] : (s.cofan Δ₁).inj A ≫ X.map p = (s.cofan Δ₂).inj (A.epiComp p) := by
dsimp [cofan]
rw [assoc, ← X.map_comp]
rfl
#align simplicial_object.splitting.ι_summand_epi_naturality SimplicialObject.Splitting.cofan_inj_epi_naturality
end Splitting
variable (C)
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
/-- The category `SimplicialObject.Split C` is the category of simplicial objects
in `C` equipped with a splitting, and morphisms are morphisms of simplicial objects
which are compatible with the splittings. -/
@[ext]
structure Split where
/-- the underlying simplicial object -/
X : SimplicialObject C
/-- a splitting of the simplicial object -/
s : Splitting X
#align simplicial_object.split SimplicialObject.Split
namespace Split
variable {C}
/-- The object in `SimplicialObject.Split C` attached to a splitting `s : Splitting X`
of a simplicial object `X`. -/
@[simps]
def mk' {X : SimplicialObject C} (s : Splitting X) : Split C :=
⟨X, s⟩
#align simplicial_object.split.mk' SimplicialObject.Split.mk'
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
/-- Morphisms in `SimplicialObject.Split C` are morphisms of simplicial objects that
are compatible with the splittings. -/
structure Hom (S₁ S₂ : Split C) where
/-- the morphism between the underlying simplicial objects -/
F : S₁.X ⟶ S₂.X
/-- the morphism between the "nondegenerate" `n`-simplices for all `n : ℕ` -/
f : ∀ n : ℕ, S₁.s.N n ⟶ S₂.s.N n
comm : ∀ n : ℕ, S₁.s.ι n ≫ F.app (op [n]) = f n ≫ S₂.s.ι n := by aesop_cat
#align simplicial_object.split.hom SimplicialObject.Split.Hom
@[ext]
theorem Hom.ext {S₁ S₂ : Split C} (Φ₁ Φ₂ : Hom S₁ S₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, Φ₁.f n = Φ₂.f n) : Φ₁ = Φ₂ := by
rcases Φ₁ with ⟨F₁, f₁, c₁⟩
rcases Φ₂ with ⟨F₂, f₂, c₂⟩
have h' : f₁ = f₂ := by
ext
apply h
subst h'
simp only [mk.injEq, and_true]
apply S₁.s.hom_ext
intro n
dsimp
rw [c₁, c₂]
#align simplicial_object.split.hom.ext SimplicialObject.Split.Hom.ext
attribute [simp, reassoc] Hom.comm
end Split
instance : Category (Split C) where
Hom := Split.Hom
id S :=
{ F := 𝟙 _
f := fun n => 𝟙 _ }
comp Φ₁₂ Φ₂₃ :=
{ F := Φ₁₂.F ≫ Φ₂₃.F
f := fun n => Φ₁₂.f n ≫ Φ₂₃.f n
comm := fun n => by
dsimp
simp only [assoc, Split.Hom.comm_assoc, Split.Hom.comm] }
variable {C}
namespace Split
-- Porting note: added as `Hom.ext` is not triggered automatically
@[ext]
theorem hom_ext {S₁ S₂ : Split C} (Φ₁ Φ₂ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, Φ₁.f n = Φ₂.f n) : Φ₁ = Φ₂ :=
Hom.ext _ _ h
theorem congr_F {S₁ S₂ : Split C} {Φ₁ Φ₂ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} (h : Φ₁ = Φ₂) : Φ₁.f = Φ₂.f := by rw [h]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align simplicial_object.split.congr_F SimplicialObject.Split.congr_F
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/SplitSimplicialObject.lean | 395 | 396 | theorem congr_f {S₁ S₂ : Split C} {Φ₁ Φ₂ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} (h : Φ₁ = Φ₂) (n : ℕ) : Φ₁.f n = Φ₂.f n := by |
rw [h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Two
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
#align_import data.nat.totient from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5cc2dfdd3e92f340411acea4427d701dc7ed26f8"
/-!
# Euler's totient function
This file defines [Euler's totient function](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_totient_function)
`Nat.totient n` which counts the number of naturals less than `n` that are coprime with `n`.
We prove the divisor sum formula, namely that `n` equals `φ` summed over the divisors of `n`. See
`sum_totient`. We also prove two lemmas to help compute totients, namely `totient_mul` and
`totient_prime_pow`.
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
/-- Euler's totient function. This counts the number of naturals strictly less than `n` which are
coprime with `n`. -/
def totient (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
((range n).filter n.Coprime).card
#align nat.totient Nat.totient
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "φ" => Nat.totient
@[simp]
theorem totient_zero : φ 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align nat.totient_zero Nat.totient_zero
@[simp]
theorem totient_one : φ 1 = 1 := rfl
#align nat.totient_one Nat.totient_one
theorem totient_eq_card_coprime (n : ℕ) : φ n = ((range n).filter n.Coprime).card :=
rfl
#align nat.totient_eq_card_coprime Nat.totient_eq_card_coprime
/-- A characterisation of `Nat.totient` that avoids `Finset`. -/
theorem totient_eq_card_lt_and_coprime (n : ℕ) : φ n = Nat.card { m | m < n ∧ n.Coprime m } := by
let e : { m | m < n ∧ n.Coprime m } ≃ Finset.filter n.Coprime (Finset.range n) :=
{ toFun := fun m => ⟨m, by simpa only [Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range] using m.property⟩
invFun := fun m => ⟨m, by simpa only [Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range] using m.property⟩
left_inv := fun m => by simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_eta]
right_inv := fun m => by simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_eta] }
rw [totient_eq_card_coprime, card_congr e, card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_coe]
#align nat.totient_eq_card_lt_and_coprime Nat.totient_eq_card_lt_and_coprime
theorem totient_le (n : ℕ) : φ n ≤ n :=
((range n).card_filter_le _).trans_eq (card_range n)
#align nat.totient_le Nat.totient_le
theorem totient_lt (n : ℕ) (hn : 1 < n) : φ n < n :=
(card_lt_card (filter_ssubset.2 ⟨0, by simp [hn.ne', pos_of_gt hn]⟩)).trans_eq (card_range n)
#align nat.totient_lt Nat.totient_lt
@[simp]
theorem totient_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ}, φ n = 0 ↔ n = 0
| 0 => by decide
| n + 1 =>
suffices ∃ x < n + 1, (n + 1).gcd x = 1 by simpa [totient, filter_eq_empty_iff]
⟨1 % (n + 1), mod_lt _ n.succ_pos, by rw [gcd_comm, ← gcd_rec, gcd_one_right]⟩
@[simp] theorem totient_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < φ n ↔ 0 < n := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align nat.totient_pos Nat.totient_pos
theorem filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient (a n : ℕ) :
((Ico n (n + a)).filter (Coprime a)).card = totient a := by
rw [totient, filter_Ico_card_eq_of_periodic, count_eq_card_filter_range]
exact periodic_coprime a
#align nat.filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient Nat.filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient
theorem Ico_filter_coprime_le {a : ℕ} (k n : ℕ) (a_pos : 0 < a) :
((Ico k (k + n)).filter (Coprime a)).card ≤ totient a * (n / a + 1) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← Nat.mod_add_div n a]
induction' n / a with i ih
· rw [← filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient a k]
simp only [add_zero, mul_one, mul_zero, le_of_lt (mod_lt n a_pos),
Nat.zero_eq, zero_add]
-- Porting note: below line was `mono`
refine Finset.card_mono ?_
refine monotone_filter_left a.Coprime ?_
simp only [Finset.le_eq_subset]
exact Ico_subset_Ico rfl.le (add_le_add_left (le_of_lt (mod_lt n a_pos)) k)
simp only [mul_succ]
simp_rw [← add_assoc] at ih ⊢
calc
(filter a.Coprime (Ico k (k + n % a + a * i + a))).card = (filter a.Coprime
(Ico k (k + n % a + a * i) ∪ Ico (k + n % a + a * i) (k + n % a + a * i + a))).card := by
congr
rw [Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico]
· rw [add_assoc]
exact le_self_add
exact le_self_add
_ ≤ (filter a.Coprime (Ico k (k + n % a + a * i))).card + a.totient := by
rw [filter_union, ← filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient a (k + n % a + a * i)]
apply card_union_le
_ ≤ a.totient * i + a.totient + a.totient := add_le_add_right ih (totient a)
#align nat.Ico_filter_coprime_le Nat.Ico_filter_coprime_le
open ZMod
/-- Note this takes an explicit `Fintype ((ZMod n)ˣ)` argument to avoid trouble with instance
diamonds. -/
@[simp]
theorem _root_.ZMod.card_units_eq_totient (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] [Fintype (ZMod n)ˣ] :
Fintype.card (ZMod n)ˣ = φ n :=
calc
Fintype.card (ZMod n)ˣ = Fintype.card { x : ZMod n // x.val.Coprime n } :=
Fintype.card_congr ZMod.unitsEquivCoprime
_ = φ n := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ : ∃ m, n = m + 1 := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero NeZero.out
simp only [totient, Finset.card_eq_sum_ones, Fintype.card_subtype, Finset.sum_filter, ←
Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range, @Nat.coprime_comm (m + 1)]
rfl
#align zmod.card_units_eq_totient ZMod.card_units_eq_totient
theorem totient_even {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 < n) : Even n.totient := by
haveI : Fact (1 < n) := ⟨one_lt_two.trans hn⟩
haveI : NeZero n := NeZero.of_gt hn
suffices 2 = orderOf (-1 : (ZMod n)ˣ) by
rw [← ZMod.card_units_eq_totient, even_iff_two_dvd, this]
exact orderOf_dvd_card
rw [← orderOf_units, Units.coe_neg_one, orderOf_neg_one, ringChar.eq (ZMod n) n, if_neg hn.ne']
#align nat.totient_even Nat.totient_even
theorem totient_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) : φ (m * n) = φ m * φ n :=
if hmn0 : m * n = 0 then by
cases' Nat.mul_eq_zero.1 hmn0 with h h <;>
simp only [totient_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul, h]
else by
haveI : NeZero (m * n) := ⟨hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero m := ⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨right_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
simp only [← ZMod.card_units_eq_totient]
rw [Fintype.card_congr (Units.mapEquiv (ZMod.chineseRemainder h).toMulEquiv).toEquiv,
Fintype.card_congr (@MulEquiv.prodUnits (ZMod m) (ZMod n) _ _).toEquiv, Fintype.card_prod]
#align nat.totient_mul Nat.totient_mul
/-- For `d ∣ n`, the totient of `n/d` equals the number of values `k < n` such that `gcd n k = d` -/
theorem totient_div_of_dvd {n d : ℕ} (hnd : d ∣ n) :
φ (n / d) = (filter (fun k : ℕ => n.gcd k = d) (range n)).card := by
rcases d.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hd0); · simp [eq_zero_of_zero_dvd hnd]
rcases hnd with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left x hd0]
apply Finset.card_bij fun k _ => d * k
· simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, and_imp, Coprime]
refine fun a ha1 ha2 => ⟨(mul_lt_mul_left hd0).2 ha1, ?_⟩
rw [gcd_mul_left, ha2, mul_one]
· simp [hd0.ne']
· simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, exists_prop, and_imp]
refine fun b hb1 hb2 => ?_
have : d ∣ b := by
rw [← hb2]
apply gcd_dvd_right
rcases this with ⟨q, rfl⟩
refine ⟨q, ⟨⟨(mul_lt_mul_left hd0).1 hb1, ?_⟩, rfl⟩⟩
rwa [gcd_mul_left, mul_right_eq_self_iff hd0] at hb2
#align nat.totient_div_of_dvd Nat.totient_div_of_dvd
theorem sum_totient (n : ℕ) : n.divisors.sum φ = n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rw [← sum_div_divisors n φ]
have : n = ∑ d ∈ n.divisors, (filter (fun k : ℕ => n.gcd k = d) (range n)).card := by
nth_rw 1 [← card_range n]
refine card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise fun x _ => mem_divisors.2 ⟨?_, hn.ne'⟩
apply gcd_dvd_left
nth_rw 3 [this]
exact sum_congr rfl fun x hx => totient_div_of_dvd (dvd_of_mem_divisors hx)
#align nat.sum_totient Nat.sum_totient
theorem sum_totient' (n : ℕ) : (∑ m ∈ (range n.succ).filter (· ∣ n), φ m) = n := by
convert sum_totient _ using 1
simp only [Nat.divisors, sum_filter, range_eq_Ico]
rw [sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot] <;> simp
#align nat.sum_totient' Nat.sum_totient'
/-- When `p` is prime, then the totient of `p ^ (n + 1)` is `p ^ n * (p - 1)` -/
theorem totient_prime_pow_succ {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (n : ℕ) : φ (p ^ (n + 1)) = p ^ n * (p - 1) :=
calc
φ (p ^ (n + 1)) = ((range (p ^ (n + 1))).filter (Coprime (p ^ (n + 1)))).card :=
totient_eq_card_coprime _
_ = (range (p ^ (n + 1)) \ (range (p ^ n)).image (· * p)).card :=
(congr_arg card
(by
rw [sdiff_eq_filter]
apply filter_congr
simp only [mem_range, mem_filter, coprime_pow_left_iff n.succ_pos, mem_image, not_exists,
hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd]
intro a ha
constructor
· intro hap b h; rcases h with ⟨_, rfl⟩
exact hap (dvd_mul_left _ _)
· rintro h ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [pow_succ'] at ha
exact h b ⟨lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left ha (zero_le _), mul_comm _ _⟩))
_ = _ := by
have h1 : Function.Injective (· * p) := mul_left_injective₀ hp.ne_zero
have h2 : (range (p ^ n)).image (· * p) ⊆ range (p ^ (n + 1)) := fun a => by
simp only [mem_image, mem_range, exists_imp]
rintro b ⟨h, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.pow_succ]
exact (mul_lt_mul_right hp.pos).2 h
rw [card_sdiff h2, Finset.card_image_of_injective _ h1, card_range, card_range, ←
one_mul (p ^ n), pow_succ', ← tsub_mul, one_mul, mul_comm]
#align nat.totient_prime_pow_succ Nat.totient_prime_pow_succ
/-- When `p` is prime, then the totient of `p ^ n` is `p ^ (n - 1) * (p - 1)` -/
theorem totient_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
φ (p ^ n) = p ^ (n - 1) * (p - 1) := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact totient_prime_pow_succ hp _
#align nat.totient_prime_pow Nat.totient_prime_pow
theorem totient_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : φ p = p - 1 := by
rw [← pow_one p, totient_prime_pow hp] <;> simp
#align nat.totient_prime Nat.totient_prime
theorem totient_eq_iff_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) : p.totient = p - 1 ↔ p.Prime := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, totient_prime⟩
replace hp : 1 < p := by
apply lt_of_le_of_ne
· rwa [succ_le_iff]
· rintro rfl
rw [totient_one, tsub_self] at h
exact one_ne_zero h
rw [totient_eq_card_coprime, range_eq_Ico, ← Ico_insert_succ_left hp.le, Finset.filter_insert,
if_neg (not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd hp (dvd_refl p) (dvd_zero p)), ← Nat.card_Ico 1 p] at h
refine
p.prime_of_coprime hp fun n hn hnz => Finset.filter_card_eq h n <| Finset.mem_Ico.mpr ⟨?_, hn⟩
rwa [succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align nat.totient_eq_iff_prime Nat.totient_eq_iff_prime
theorem card_units_zmod_lt_sub_one {p : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) [Fintype (ZMod p)ˣ] :
Fintype.card (ZMod p)ˣ ≤ p - 1 := by
haveI : NeZero p := ⟨(pos_of_gt hp).ne'⟩
rw [ZMod.card_units_eq_totient p]
exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (Nat.totient_lt p hp)
#align nat.card_units_zmod_lt_sub_one Nat.card_units_zmod_lt_sub_one
theorem prime_iff_card_units (p : ℕ) [Fintype (ZMod p)ˣ] :
p.Prime ↔ Fintype.card (ZMod p)ˣ = p - 1 := by
cases' eq_zero_or_neZero p with hp hp
· subst hp
simp only [ZMod, not_prime_zero, false_iff_iff, zero_tsub]
-- the subst created a non-defeq but subsingleton instance diamond; resolve it
suffices Fintype.card ℤˣ ≠ 0 by convert this
simp
rw [ZMod.card_units_eq_totient, Nat.totient_eq_iff_prime <| NeZero.pos p]
#align nat.prime_iff_card_units Nat.prime_iff_card_units
@[simp]
theorem totient_two : φ 2 = 1 :=
(totient_prime prime_two).trans rfl
#align nat.totient_two Nat.totient_two
theorem totient_eq_one_iff : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n.totient = 1 ↔ n = 1 ∨ n = 2
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
| 2 => by simp
| n + 3 => by
have : 3 ≤ n + 3 := le_add_self
simp only [succ_succ_ne_one, false_or_iff]
exact ⟨fun h => not_even_one.elim <| h ▸ totient_even this, by rintro ⟨⟩⟩
#align nat.totient_eq_one_iff Nat.totient_eq_one_iff
theorem dvd_two_of_totient_le_one {a : ℕ} (han : 0 < a) (ha : a.totient ≤ 1) : a ∣ 2 := by
rcases totient_eq_one_iff.mp <| le_antisymm ha <| totient_pos.2 han with rfl | rfl <;> norm_num
/-! ### Euler's product formula for the totient function
We prove several different statements of this formula. -/
/-- Euler's product formula for the totient function. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Totient.lean | 288 | 294 | theorem totient_eq_prod_factorization {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
φ n = n.factorization.prod fun p k => p ^ (k - 1) * (p - 1) := by |
rw [multiplicative_factorization φ (@totient_mul) totient_one hn]
apply Finsupp.prod_congr _
intro p hp
have h := zero_lt_iff.mpr (Finsupp.mem_support_iff.mp hp)
rw [totient_prime_pow (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp) h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.AssocList
import Batteries.Data.Nat.Basic
import Batteries.Data.Array.Monadic
import Batteries.Classes.BEq
namespace Batteries.HashMap
/-- A hash is lawful if elements which compare equal under `==` have equal hash. -/
class LawfulHashable (α : Type _) [BEq α] [Hashable α] : Prop where
/-- Two elements which compare equal under the `BEq` instance have equal hash. -/
hash_eq {a b : α} : a == b → hash a = hash b
namespace Imp
/--
The bucket array of a `HashMap` is a nonempty array of `AssocList`s.
(This type is an internal implementation detail of `HashMap`.)
-/
def Buckets (α : Type u) (β : Type v) := {b : Array (AssocList α β) // 0 < b.size}
namespace Buckets
/-- Construct a new empty bucket array with the specified capacity. -/
def mk (buckets := 8) (h : 0 < buckets := by decide) : Buckets α β :=
⟨mkArray buckets .nil, by simp [h]⟩
/-- Update one bucket in the bucket array with a new value. -/
def update (data : Buckets α β) (i : USize)
(d : AssocList α β) (h : i.toNat < data.1.size) : Buckets α β :=
⟨data.1.uset i d h, (Array.size_uset ..).symm ▸ data.2⟩
/--
The number of elements in the bucket array.
Note: this is marked `noncomputable` because it is only intended for specification.
-/
noncomputable def size (data : Buckets α β) : Nat := .sum (data.1.data.map (·.toList.length))
@[simp] theorem update_size (self : Buckets α β) (i d h) :
(self.update i d h).1.size = self.1.size := Array.size_uset ..
/-- Map a function over the values in the map. -/
@[specialize] def mapVal (f : α → β → γ) (self : Buckets α β) : Buckets α γ :=
⟨self.1.map (.mapVal f), by simp [self.2]⟩
/--
The well-formedness invariant for the bucket array says that every element hashes to its index
(assuming the hash is lawful - otherwise there are no promises about where elements are located).
-/
structure WF [BEq α] [Hashable α] (buckets : Buckets α β) : Prop where
/-- The elements of a bucket are all distinct according to the `BEq` relation. -/
distinct [LawfulHashable α] [PartialEquivBEq α] : ∀ bucket ∈ buckets.1.data,
bucket.toList.Pairwise fun a b => ¬(a.1 == b.1)
/-- Every element in a bucket should hash to its location. -/
hash_self (i : Nat) (h : i < buckets.1.size) :
buckets.1[i].All fun k _ => ((hash k).toUSize % buckets.1.size).toNat = i
end Buckets
end Imp
/-- `HashMap.Imp α β` is the internal implementation type of `HashMap α β`. -/
structure Imp (α : Type u) (β : Type v) where
/-- The number of elements stored in the `HashMap`.
We cache this both so that we can implement `.size` in `O(1)`, and also because we
use the size to determine when to resize the map. -/
size : Nat
/-- The bucket array of the `HashMap`. -/
buckets : Imp.Buckets α β
namespace Imp
/--
Given a desired capacity, this returns the number of buckets we should reserve.
A "load factor" of 0.75 is the usual standard for hash maps, so we return `capacity * 4 / 3`.
-/
@[inline] def numBucketsForCapacity (capacity : Nat) : Nat :=
capacity * 4 / 3
/-- Constructs an empty hash map with the specified nonzero number of buckets. -/
@[inline] def empty' (buckets := 8) (h : 0 < buckets := by decide) : Imp α β :=
⟨0, .mk buckets h⟩
/-- Constructs an empty hash map with the specified target capacity. -/
def empty (capacity := 0) : Imp α β :=
let nbuckets := numBucketsForCapacity capacity
let n : {n : Nat // 0 < n} :=
if h : nbuckets = 0 then ⟨8, by decide⟩
else ⟨nbuckets, Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero h⟩
empty' n n.2
/-- Calculates the bucket index from a hash value `u`. -/
def mkIdx {n : Nat} (h : 0 < n) (u : USize) : {u : USize // u.toNat < n} :=
⟨u % n, USize.modn_lt _ h⟩
/--
Inserts a key-value pair into the bucket array. This function assumes that the data is not
already in the array, which is appropriate when reinserting elements into the array after a resize.
-/
@[inline] def reinsertAux [Hashable α]
(data : Buckets α β) (a : α) (b : β) : Buckets α β :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := mkIdx data.2 (hash a |>.toUSize)
data.update i (.cons a b data.1[i]) h
/-- Folds a monadic function over the elements in the map (in arbitrary order). -/
@[inline] def foldM [Monad m] (f : δ → α → β → m δ) (d : δ) (map : Imp α β) : m δ :=
map.buckets.1.foldlM (init := d) fun d b => b.foldlM f d
/-- Folds a function over the elements in the map (in arbitrary order). -/
@[inline] def fold (f : δ → α → β → δ) (d : δ) (m : Imp α β) : δ :=
Id.run $ foldM f d m
/-- Runs a monadic function over the elements in the map (in arbitrary order). -/
@[inline] def forM [Monad m] (f : α → β → m PUnit) (h : Imp α β) : m PUnit :=
h.buckets.1.forM fun b => b.forM f
/-- Given a key `a`, returns a key-value pair in the map whose key compares equal to `a`. -/
def findEntry? [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : Imp α β) (a : α) : Option (α × β) :=
let ⟨_, buckets⟩ := m
let ⟨i, h⟩ := mkIdx buckets.2 (hash a |>.toUSize)
buckets.1[i].findEntry? a
/-- Looks up an element in the map with key `a`. -/
def find? [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : Imp α β) (a : α) : Option β :=
let ⟨_, buckets⟩ := m
let ⟨i, h⟩ := mkIdx buckets.2 (hash a |>.toUSize)
buckets.1[i].find? a
/-- Returns true if the element `a` is in the map. -/
def contains [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : Imp α β) (a : α) : Bool :=
let ⟨_, buckets⟩ := m
let ⟨i, h⟩ := mkIdx buckets.2 (hash a |>.toUSize)
buckets.1[i].contains a
/-- Copies all the entries from `buckets` into a new hash map with a larger capacity. -/
def expand [Hashable α] (size : Nat) (buckets : Buckets α β) : Imp α β :=
let nbuckets := buckets.1.size * 2
{ size, buckets := go 0 buckets.1 (.mk nbuckets (Nat.mul_pos buckets.2 (by decide))) }
where
/-- Inner loop of `expand`. Copies elements `source[i:]` into `target`,
destroying `source` in the process. -/
go (i : Nat) (source : Array (AssocList α β)) (target : Buckets α β) : Buckets α β :=
if h : i < source.size then
let idx : Fin source.size := ⟨i, h⟩
let es := source.get idx
-- We remove `es` from `source` to make sure we can reuse its memory cells
-- when performing es.foldl
let source := source.set idx .nil
let target := es.foldl reinsertAux target
go (i+1) source target
else target
termination_by source.size - i
/--
Inserts key-value pair `a, b` into the map.
If an element equal to `a` is already in the map, it is replaced by `b`.
-/
@[inline] def insert [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : Imp α β) (a : α) (b : β) : Imp α β :=
let ⟨size, buckets⟩ := m
let ⟨i, h⟩ := mkIdx buckets.2 (hash a |>.toUSize)
let bkt := buckets.1[i]
bif bkt.contains a then
⟨size, buckets.update i (bkt.replace a b) h⟩
else
let size' := size + 1
let buckets' := buckets.update i (.cons a b bkt) h
if numBucketsForCapacity size' ≤ buckets.1.size then
{ size := size', buckets := buckets' }
else
expand size' buckets'
/--
Removes key `a` from the map. If it does not exist in the map, the map is returned unchanged.
-/
def erase [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : Imp α β) (a : α) : Imp α β :=
let ⟨size, buckets⟩ := m
let ⟨i, h⟩ := mkIdx buckets.2 (hash a |>.toUSize)
let bkt := buckets.1[i]
bif bkt.contains a then ⟨size - 1, buckets.update i (bkt.erase a) h⟩ else ⟨size, buckets⟩
/-- Map a function over the values in the map. -/
@[inline] def mapVal (f : α → β → γ) (self : Imp α β) : Imp α γ :=
{ size := self.size, buckets := self.buckets.mapVal f }
/-- Performs an in-place edit of the value, ensuring that the value is used linearly. -/
def modify [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : Imp α β) (a : α) (f : α → β → β) : Imp α β :=
let ⟨size, buckets⟩ := m
let ⟨i, h⟩ := mkIdx buckets.2 (hash a |>.toUSize)
let bkt := buckets.1[i]
let buckets := buckets.update i .nil h -- for linearity
⟨size, buckets.update i (bkt.modify a f) ((Buckets.update_size ..).symm ▸ h)⟩
/--
Applies `f` to each key-value pair `a, b` in the map. If it returns `some c` then
`a, c` is pushed into the new map; else the key is removed from the map.
-/
@[specialize] def filterMap {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
(f : α → β → Option γ) (m : Imp α β) : Imp α γ :=
let m' := m.buckets.1.mapM (m := StateT (ULift Nat) Id) (go .nil) |>.run ⟨0⟩ |>.run
have : m'.1.size > 0 := by
have := Array.size_mapM (m := StateT (ULift Nat) Id) (go .nil) m.buckets.1
simp [SatisfiesM_StateT_eq, SatisfiesM_Id_eq] at this
simp [this, Id.run, StateT.run, m.2.2, m']
⟨m'.2.1, m'.1, this⟩
where
/-- Inner loop of `filterMap`. Note that this reverses the bucket lists,
but this is fine since bucket lists are unordered. -/
@[specialize] go (acc : AssocList α γ) : AssocList α β → ULift Nat → AssocList α γ × ULift Nat
| .nil, n => (acc, n)
| .cons a b l, n => match f a b with
| none => go acc l n
| some c => go (.cons a c acc) l ⟨n.1 + 1⟩
/-- Constructs a map with the set of all pairs `a, b` such that `f` returns true. -/
@[inline] def filter (f : α → β → Bool) (m : Imp α β) : Imp α β :=
m.filterMap fun a b => bif f a b then some b else none
/--
The well-formedness invariant for a hash map. The first constructor is the real invariant,
and the others allow us to "cheat" in this file and define `insert` and `erase`,
which have more complex proofs that are delayed to `Batteries.Data.HashMap.Lemmas`.
-/
inductive WF [BEq α] [Hashable α] : Imp α β → Prop where
/-- The real well-formedness invariant:
* The `size` field should match the actual number of elements in the map
* The bucket array should be well-formed, meaning that if the hashable instance
is lawful then every element hashes to its index. -/
| mk : m.size = m.buckets.size → m.buckets.WF → WF m
/-- The empty hash map is well formed. -/
| empty' : WF (empty' n h)
/-- Inserting into a well formed hash map yields a well formed hash map. -/
| insert : WF m → WF (insert m a b)
/-- Removing an element from a well formed hash map yields a well formed hash map. -/
| erase : WF m → WF (erase m a)
/-- Replacing an element in a well formed hash map yields a well formed hash map. -/
| modify : WF m → WF (modify m a f)
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/HashMap/Basic.lean | 241 | 241 | theorem WF.empty [BEq α] [Hashable α] : WF (empty n : Imp α β) := by | unfold empty; apply empty'
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RCLike
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.projection from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0b7c740e25651db0ba63648fbae9f9d6f941e31b"
/-!
# The orthogonal projection
Given a nonempty complete subspace `K` of an inner product space `E`, this file constructs
`orthogonalProjection K : E →L[𝕜] K`, the orthogonal projection of `E` onto `K`. This map
satisfies: for any point `u` in `E`, the point `v = orthogonalProjection K u` in `K` minimizes the
distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
Also a linear isometry equivalence `reflection K : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` is constructed, by choosing, for
each `u : E`, the point `reflection K u` to satisfy
`u + (reflection K u) = 2 • orthogonalProjection K u`.
Basic API for `orthogonalProjection` and `reflection` is developed.
Next, the orthogonal projection is used to prove a series of more subtle lemmas about the
orthogonal complement of complete subspaces of `E` (the orthogonal complement itself was
defined in `Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal`); the lemma
`Submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace`, stating that for a complete subspace `K` of `E` we have
`K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤`, is a typical example.
## References
The orthogonal projection construction is adapted from
* [Clément & Martin, *The Lax-Milgram Theorem. A detailed proof to be formalized in Coq*]
* [Clément & Martin, *A Coq formal proof of the Lax–Milgram theorem*]
The Coq code is available at the following address: <http://www.lri.fr/~sboldo/elfic/index.html>
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter
open LinearMap (ker range)
open Topology
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "absR" => abs
/-! ### Orthogonal projection in inner product spaces -/
-- FIXME this monolithic proof causes a deterministic timeout with `-T50000`
-- It should be broken in a sequence of more manageable pieces,
-- perhaps with individual statements for the three steps below.
/-- Existence of minimizers
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete convex subset.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
-/
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex {K : Set F} (ne : K.Nonempty) (h₁ : IsComplete K)
(h₂ : Convex ℝ K) : ∀ u : F, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ := fun u => by
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
letI : Nonempty K := ne.to_subtype
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ := le_ciInf fun _ => norm_nonneg _
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => norm_nonneg _⟩
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := fun w hw => δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
-- Step 1: since `δ` is the infimum, can find a sequence `w : ℕ → K` in `K`
-- such that `‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1)` (which implies `‖u - w n‖ --> δ`);
-- maybe this should be a separate lemma
have exists_seq : ∃ w : ℕ → K, ∀ n, ‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := by
have hδ : ∀ n : ℕ, δ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := fun n =>
lt_add_of_le_of_pos le_rfl Nat.one_div_pos_of_nat
have h := fun n => exists_lt_of_ciInf_lt (hδ n)
let w : ℕ → K := fun n => Classical.choose (h n)
exact ⟨w, fun n => Classical.choose_spec (h n)⟩
rcases exists_seq with ⟨w, hw⟩
have norm_tendsto : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
have h : Tendsto (fun _ : ℕ => δ) atTop (𝓝 δ) := tendsto_const_nhds
have h' : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => δ + 1 / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
convert h.add tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
simp only [add_zero]
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le h h' (fun x => δ_le _) fun x => le_of_lt (hw _)
-- Step 2: Prove that the sequence `w : ℕ → K` is a Cauchy sequence
have seq_is_cauchy : CauchySeq fun n => (w n : F) := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0]
-- splits into three goals
let b := fun n : ℕ => 8 * δ * (1 / (n + 1)) + 4 * (1 / (n + 1)) * (1 / (n + 1))
use fun n => √(b n)
constructor
-- first goal : `∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ √(b n)`
· intro n
exact sqrt_nonneg _
constructor
-- second goal : `∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist ↑(w n) ↑(w m) ≤ √(b N)`
· intro p q N hp hq
let wp := (w p : F)
let wq := (w q : F)
let a := u - wq
let b := u - wp
let half := 1 / (2 : ℝ)
let div := 1 / ((N : ℝ) + 1)
have :
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) :=
calc
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ :=
by ring
_ =
absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by
rw [_root_.abs_of_nonneg]
exact zero_le_two
_ =
‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ * ‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by simp [norm_smul]
_ = ‖a + b‖ * ‖a + b‖ + ‖a - b‖ * ‖a - b‖ := by
rw [smul_sub, smul_smul, mul_one_div_cancel (_root_.two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ←
one_add_one_eq_two, add_smul]
simp only [one_smul]
have eq₁ : wp - wq = a - b := (sub_sub_sub_cancel_left _ _ _).symm
have eq₂ : u + u - (wq + wp) = a + b := by
show u + u - (wq + wp) = u - wq + (u - wp)
abel
rw [eq₁, eq₂]
_ = 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) := parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ _ _
have eq : δ ≤ ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
rw [smul_add]
apply δ_le'
apply h₂
repeat' exact Subtype.mem _
repeat' exact le_of_lt one_half_pos
exact add_halves 1
have eq₁ : 4 * δ * δ ≤ 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc]
gcongr
have eq₂ : ‖a‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw q) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hq) _)
have eq₂' : ‖b‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw p) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hp) _)
rw [dist_eq_norm]
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq
· exact sqrt_nonneg _
rw [mul_self_sqrt]
· calc
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp [← this]
_ ≤ 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ ≤ 2 * ((δ + div) * (δ + div) + (δ + div) * (δ + div)) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ = 8 * δ * div + 4 * div * div := by ring
positivity
-- third goal : `Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) => √(b n)) atTop (𝓝 0)`
suffices Tendsto (fun x ↦ √(8 * δ * x + 4 * x * x) : ℝ → ℝ) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0)
from this.comp tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
exact Continuous.tendsto' (by continuity) _ _ (by simp)
-- Step 3: By completeness of `K`, let `w : ℕ → K` converge to some `v : K`.
-- Prove that it satisfies all requirements.
rcases cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete h₁ (fun n => Subtype.mem _) seq_is_cauchy with
⟨v, hv, w_tendsto⟩
use v
use hv
have h_cont : Continuous fun v => ‖u - v‖ :=
Continuous.comp continuous_norm (Continuous.sub continuous_const continuous_id)
have : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖u - v‖) := by
convert Tendsto.comp h_cont.continuousAt w_tendsto
exact tendsto_nhds_unique this norm_tendsto
#align exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_convex exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex
/-- Characterization of minimizers for the projection on a convex set in a real inner product
space. -/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero {K : Set F} (h : Convex ℝ K) {u : F} {v : F}
(hv : v ∈ K) : (‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
letI : Nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩
constructor
· intro eq w hw
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
let p := ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ
let q := ‖w - v‖ ^ 2
have δ_le (w : K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h ▸ norm_nonneg _⟩ _
have δ_le' (w) (hw : w ∈ K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
have (θ : ℝ) (hθ₁ : 0 < θ) (hθ₂ : θ ≤ 1) : 2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
have : ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 :=
calc ‖u - v‖ ^ 2
_ ≤ ‖u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v)‖ ^ 2 := by
simp only [sq]; apply mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
rw [eq]; apply δ_le'
apply h hw hv
exacts [le_of_lt hθ₁, sub_nonneg.2 hθ₂, add_sub_cancel _ _]
_ = ‖u - v - θ • (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := by
have : u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v) = u - v - θ • (w - v) := by
rw [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc, neg_add_rev]
rw [this]
_ = ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_sq ℝ, inner_smul_right, norm_smul]
simp only [sq]
show
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * (θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) +
absR θ * ‖w - v‖ * (absR θ * ‖w - v‖) =
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * (‖w - v‖ * ‖w - v‖)
rw [abs_of_pos hθ₁]; ring
have eq₁ :
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 =
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 + (θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by
abel
rw [eq₁, le_add_iff_nonneg_right] at this
have eq₂ :
θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) =
θ * (θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by ring
rw [eq₂] at this
have := le_of_sub_nonneg (nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this hθ₁)
exact this
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq] at this
have : p ≤ 0 := by
have := this (1 : ℝ) (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
linarith
exact this
· have q_pos : 0 < q := lt_of_le_of_ne (sq_nonneg _) fun h ↦ hq h.symm
by_contra hp
rw [not_le] at hp
let θ := min (1 : ℝ) (p / q)
have eq₁ : θ * q ≤ p :=
calc
θ * q ≤ p / q * q := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_right _ _) (sq_nonneg _)
_ = p := div_mul_cancel₀ _ hq
have : 2 * p ≤ p :=
calc
2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
exact this θ (lt_min (by norm_num) (div_pos hp q_pos)) (by norm_num [θ])
_ ≤ p := eq₁
linarith
· intro h
apply le_antisymm
· apply le_ciInf
intro w
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (norm_nonneg _)
have := h w w.2
calc
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ ≤ ‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) := by linarith
_ ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) + ‖(w : F) - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sq]
refine le_add_of_nonneg_right ?_
exact sq_nonneg _
_ = ‖u - v - (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := (@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _).symm
_ = ‖u - w‖ * ‖u - w‖ := by
have : u - v - (w - v) = u - w := by abel
rw [this, sq]
· show ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ ≤ (fun w : K => ‖u - w‖) ⟨v, hv⟩
apply ciInf_le
use 0
rintro y ⟨z, rfl⟩
exact norm_nonneg _
#align norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_le_zero norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero
variable (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
/-- Existence of projections on complete subspaces.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete subspace.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
This point `v` is usually called the orthogonal projection of `u` onto `K`.
-/
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace (h : IsComplete (↑K : Set E)) :
∀ u : E, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (K : Set E), ‖u - w‖ := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := Submodule.restrictScalars ℝ K
exact exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex ⟨0, K'.zero_mem⟩ h K'.convex
#align exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace, in the real case.
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`).
This is superceded by `norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero` that gives the same conclusion over
any `RCLike` field.
-/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (K : Submodule ℝ F) {u : F} {v : F} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (↑K : Set F), ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(by
intro h
have h : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero] at h
exacts [K.convex, hv]
intro w hw
have le : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
let w' := w + v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
have h₂ : w' - v = w := by
simp only [w', add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂] at h₁
exact h₁
have ge : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≥ 0 := by
let w'' := -w + v
have : w'' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ (Submodule.neg_mem _ hw) hv
have h₁ := h w'' this
have h₂ : w'' - v = -w := by
simp only [w'', neg_inj, add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂, inner_neg_right] at h₁
linarith
exact le_antisymm le ge)
(by
intro h
have : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
intro w hw
let w' := w - v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.sub_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
exact le_of_eq h₁
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero]
exacts [Submodule.convex _, hv])
#align norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_eq_zero norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`)
-/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero {u : E} {v : E} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := K.restrictScalars ℝ
constructor
· intro H
have A : ∀ w ∈ K, re ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := (norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero K' hv).1 H
intro w hw
apply ext
· simp [A w hw]
· symm
calc
im (0 : 𝕜) = 0 := im.map_zero
_ = re ⟪u - v, (-I : 𝕜) • w⟫ := (A _ (K.smul_mem (-I) hw)).symm
_ = re (-I * ⟪u - v, w⟫) := by rw [inner_smul_right]
_ = im ⟪u - v, w⟫ := by simp
· intro H
have : ∀ w ∈ K', ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [real_inner_eq_re_inner, H w hw]
exact zero_re'
exact (norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero K' hv).2 this
#align norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_eq_zero norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero
/-- A subspace `K : Submodule 𝕜 E` has an orthogonal projection if evey vector `v : E` admits an
orthogonal projection to `K`. -/
class HasOrthogonalProjection (K : Submodule 𝕜 E) : Prop where
exists_orthogonal (v : E) : ∃ w ∈ K, v - w ∈ Kᗮ
instance (priority := 100) HasOrthogonalProjection.ofCompleteSpace [CompleteSpace K] :
HasOrthogonalProjection K where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace K (completeSpace_coe_iff_isComplete.mp ‹_›) v
with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨w, hwK, (K.mem_orthogonal' _).2 ?_⟩
rwa [← norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero K hwK]
instance [HasOrthogonalProjection K] : HasOrthogonalProjection Kᗮ where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨_, hw, ?_⟩
rw [sub_sub_cancel]
exact K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal hwK
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv [HasOrthogonalProjection K]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
HasOrthogonalProjection (K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) (f.symm v) with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨f w, Submodule.mem_map_of_mem hwK, Set.forall_mem_image.2 fun u hu ↦ ?_⟩
erw [← f.symm.inner_map_map, f.symm_apply_apply, map_sub, f.symm_apply_apply, hw u hu]
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv' [HasOrthogonalProjection K]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
HasOrthogonalProjection (K.map f.toLinearIsometry) :=
HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv K f
instance : HasOrthogonalProjection (⊤ : Submodule 𝕜 E) := ⟨fun v ↦ ⟨v, trivial, by simp⟩⟩
section orthogonalProjection
variable [HasOrthogonalProjection K]
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace, as an
unbundled function. This definition is only intended for use in
setting up the bundled version `orthogonalProjection` and should not
be used once that is defined. -/
def orthogonalProjectionFn (v : E) :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose
#align orthogonal_projection_fn orthogonalProjectionFn
variable {K}
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is in the given subspace.
This lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_mem (v : E) : orthogonalProjectionFn K v ∈ K :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.left
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_mem orthogonalProjectionFn_mem
/-- The characterization of the unbundled orthogonal projection. This
lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - orthogonalProjectionFn K v, w⟫ = 0 :=
(K.mem_orthogonal' _).1 (HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.right
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K`
with the orthogonality property. This lemma is only intended for use
in setting up the bundled version and should not be used once that is
defined. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : orthogonalProjectionFn K u = v := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜]
have hvs : orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v ∈ K :=
Submodule.sub_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem u) hvm
have huo : ⟪u - orthogonalProjectionFn K u, orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero u _ hvs
have huv : ⟪u - v, orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v⟫ = 0 := hvo _ hvs
have houv : ⟪u - v - (u - orthogonalProjectionFn K u), orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v⟫ = 0 := by
rw [inner_sub_left, huo, huv, sub_zero]
rwa [sub_sub_sub_cancel_left] at houv
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_fn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
variable (K)
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq (v : E) :
‖v‖ * ‖v‖ =
‖v - orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ * ‖v - orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ +
‖orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ * ‖orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ := by
set p := orthogonalProjectionFn K v
have h' : ⟪v - p, p⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v)
convert norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (v - p) p h' using 2 <;> simp
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_norm_sq orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace. -/
def orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] K :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun v => ⟨orthogonalProjectionFn K v, orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v⟩
map_add' := fun x y => by
have hm : orthogonalProjectionFn K x + orthogonalProjectionFn K y ∈ K :=
Submodule.add_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x) (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem y)
have ho :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪x + y - (orthogonalProjectionFn K x + orthogonalProjectionFn K y), w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [add_sub_add_comm, inner_add_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw, add_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho]
map_smul' := fun c x => by
have hm : c • orthogonalProjectionFn K x ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_mem K _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x)
have ho : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪c • x - c • orthogonalProjectionFn K x, w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [← smul_sub, inner_smul_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
mul_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho] }
1 fun x => by
simp only [one_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk]
refine le_of_pow_le_pow_left two_ne_zero (norm_nonneg _) ?_
change ‖orthogonalProjectionFn K x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2
nlinarith [orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq K x]
#align orthogonal_projection orthogonalProjection
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_eq (v : E) :
orthogonalProjectionFn K v = (orthogonalProjection K v : E) :=
rfl
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_eq orthogonalProjectionFn_eq
/-- The characterization of the orthogonal projection. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - orthogonalProjection K v, w⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero v
#align orthogonal_projection_inner_eq_zero orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero
/-- The difference of `v` from its orthogonal projection onto `K` is in `Kᗮ`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (v : E) : v - orthogonalProjection K v ∈ Kᗮ := by
intro w hw
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _ _ hw
#align sub_orthogonal_projection_mem_orthogonal sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal
/-- The orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K` with the
orthogonality property. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hvm hvo
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} (hv : v ∈ K)
(hvo : u - v ∈ Kᗮ) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hv <| (Submodule.mem_orthogonal' _ _).1 hvo
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_orthogonal eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' {u v z : E}
(hv : v ∈ K) (hz : z ∈ Kᗮ) (hu : u = v + z) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal hv (by simpa [hu] )
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_orthogonal' eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal'
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val (u : E) :
(orthogonalProjection Kᗮ u : E) = u - orthogonalProjection K u :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' (sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _)
(K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal (orthogonalProjection K u).2) <| by simp
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal (u : E) :
orthogonalProjection Kᗮ u =
⟨u - orthogonalProjection K u, sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _⟩ :=
Subtype.eq <| orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val _
/-- The orthogonal projection of `y` on `U` minimizes the distance `‖y - x‖` for `x ∈ U`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_minimal {U : Submodule 𝕜 E} [HasOrthogonalProjection U] (y : E) :
‖y - orthogonalProjection U y‖ = ⨅ x : U, ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero _ (Submodule.coe_mem _)]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _
#align orthogonal_projection_minimal orthogonalProjection_minimal
/-- The orthogonal projections onto equal subspaces are coerced back to the same point in `E`. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule {K' : Submodule 𝕜 E} [HasOrthogonalProjection K']
(h : K = K') (u : E) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = (orthogonalProjection K' u : E) := by
subst h; rfl
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_eq_submodule eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule
/-- The orthogonal projection sends elements of `K` to themselves. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self (v : K) : orthogonalProjection K v = v := by
ext
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero <;> simp
#align orthogonal_projection_mem_subspace_eq_self orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self
/-- A point equals its orthogonal projection if and only if it lies in the subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff {v : E} : (orthogonalProjection K v : E) = v ↔ v ∈ K := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero h ?_⟩
· rw [← h]
simp
· simp
#align orthogonal_projection_eq_self_iff orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff {v : E} : orthogonalProjection K v = 0 ↔ v ∈ Kᗮ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ Subtype.eq <| eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal
(zero_mem _) ?_⟩
· simpa [h] using sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (K := K) v
· simpa
@[simp]
theorem ker_orthogonalProjection : LinearMap.ker (orthogonalProjection K) = Kᗮ := by
ext; exact orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff
theorem LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [HasOrthogonalProjection p] [HasOrthogonalProjection (p.map f.toLinearMap)]
(x : E) : f (orthogonalProjection p x) = orthogonalProjection (p.map f.toLinearMap) (f x) := by
refine (eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero ?_ fun y hy => ?_).symm
· refine Submodule.apply_coe_mem_map _ _
rcases hy with ⟨x', hx', rfl : f x' = y⟩
rw [← f.map_sub, f.inner_map_map, orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero x x' hx']
#align linear_isometry.map_orthogonal_projection LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection
theorem LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection' {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [HasOrthogonalProjection p] [HasOrthogonalProjection (p.map f)] (x : E) :
f (orthogonalProjection p x) = orthogonalProjection (p.map f) (f x) :=
have : HasOrthogonalProjection (p.map f.toLinearMap) := ‹_›
f.map_orthogonalProjection p x
#align linear_isometry.map_orthogonal_projection' LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection'
/-- Orthogonal projection onto the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_map_apply {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [HasOrthogonalProjection p] (x : E') :
(orthogonalProjection (p.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) x : E') =
f (orthogonalProjection p (f.symm x)) := by
simpa only [f.coe_toLinearIsometry, f.apply_symm_apply] using
(f.toLinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection' p (f.symm x)).symm
#align orthogonal_projection_map_apply orthogonalProjection_map_apply
/-- The orthogonal projection onto the trivial submodule is the zero map. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_bot : orthogonalProjection (⊥ : Submodule 𝕜 E) = 0 := by ext
#align orthogonal_projection_bot orthogonalProjection_bot
variable (K)
/-- The orthogonal projection has norm `≤ 1`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_norm_le : ‖orthogonalProjection K‖ ≤ 1 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (by norm_num) _
#align orthogonal_projection_norm_le orthogonalProjection_norm_le
variable (𝕜)
theorem smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜) • (orthogonalProjection (𝕜 ∙ v) w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v := by
suffices ((orthogonalProjection (𝕜 ∙ v) (((‖v‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) • w)) : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v by
simpa using this
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
· rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
use ⟪v, w⟫
· rw [← Submodule.mem_orthogonal', Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left]
simp [inner_sub_left, inner_smul_left, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, mul_comm]
#align smul_orthogonal_projection_singleton smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single vector. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Projection.lean | 629 | 639 | theorem orthogonalProjection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
(orthogonalProjection (𝕜 ∙ v) w : E) = (⟪v, w⟫ / ((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)) • v := by |
by_cases hv : v = 0
· rw [hv, eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule (Submodule.span_zero_singleton 𝕜)]
simp
have hv' : ‖v‖ ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (norm_pos_iff.mpr hv)
have key :
(((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)) • ((orthogonalProjection (𝕜 ∙ v) w) : E) =
(((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ⟪v, w⟫) • v := by
simp [mul_smul, smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton 𝕜 w, -ofReal_pow]
convert key using 1 <;> field_simp [hv']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Composition
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ChartedSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
#align_import geometry.manifold.smooth_manifold_with_corners from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ddec54a71a0dd025c05445d467f1a2b7d586a3ba"
/-!
# Smooth manifolds (possibly with boundary or corners)
A smooth manifold is a manifold modelled on a normed vector space, or a subset like a
half-space (to get manifolds with boundaries) for which the changes of coordinates are smooth maps.
We define a model with corners as a map `I : H → E` embedding nicely the topological space `H` in
the vector space `E` (or more precisely as a structure containing all the relevant properties).
Given such a model with corners `I` on `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of local
homeomorphisms of `H` which are smooth when read in `E` (for any regularity `n : ℕ∞`).
With this groupoid at hand and the general machinery of charted spaces, we thus get the notion
of `C^n` manifold with respect to any model with corners `I` on `(E, H)`. We also introduce a
specific type class for `C^∞` manifolds as these are the most commonly used.
Some texts assume manifolds to be Hausdorff and secound countable. We (in mathlib) assume neither,
but add these assumptions later as needed. (Quite a few results still do not require them.)
## Main definitions
* `ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H` :
a structure containing informations on the way a space `H` embeds in a
model vector space E over the field `𝕜`. This is all that is needed to
define a smooth manifold with model space `H`, and model vector space `E`.
* `modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E` :
trivial model with corners structure on the space `E` embedded in itself by the identity.
* `contDiffGroupoid n I` :
when `I` is a model with corners on `(𝕜, E, H)`, this is the groupoid of partial homeos of `H`
which are of class `C^n` over the normed field `𝕜`, when read in `E`.
* `SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M` :
a type class saying that the charted space `M`, modelled on the space `H`, has `C^∞` changes of
coordinates with respect to the model with corners `I` on `(𝕜, E, H)`. This type class is just
a shortcut for `HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)`.
* `extChartAt I x`:
in a smooth manifold with corners with the model `I` on `(E, H)`, the charts take values in `H`,
but often we may want to use their `E`-valued version, obtained by composing the charts with `I`.
Since the target is in general not open, we can not register them as partial homeomorphisms, but
we register them as `PartialEquiv`s.
`extChartAt I x` is the canonical such partial equiv around `x`.
As specific examples of models with corners, we define (in `Geometry.Manifold.Instances.Real`)
* `modelWithCornersSelf ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n))` for the model space used to define
`n`-dimensional real manifolds without boundary (with notation `𝓡 n` in the locale `Manifold`)
* `ModelWithCorners ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) (EuclideanHalfSpace n)` for the model space
used to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with boundary (with notation `𝓡∂ n` in the locale
`Manifold`)
* `ModelWithCorners ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) (EuclideanQuadrant n)` for the model space used
to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with corners
With these definitions at hand, to invoke an `n`-dimensional real manifold without boundary,
one could use
`variable {n : ℕ} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) M]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners (𝓡 n) M]`.
However, this is not the recommended way: a theorem proved using this assumption would not apply
for instance to the tangent space of such a manifold, which is modelled on
`(EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) × (EuclideanSpace (Fin n))` and not on `EuclideanSpace (Fin (2 * n))`!
In the same way, it would not apply to product manifolds, modelled on
`(EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) × (EuclideanSpace (Fin m))`.
The right invocation does not focus on one specific construction, but on all constructions sharing
the right properties, like
`variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
{I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E E} [I.Boundaryless]
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace E M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M]`
Here, `I.Boundaryless` is a typeclass property ensuring that there is no boundary (this is for
instance the case for `modelWithCornersSelf`, or products of these). Note that one could consider
as a natural assumption to only use the trivial model with corners `modelWithCornersSelf ℝ E`,
but again in product manifolds the natural model with corners will not be this one but the product
one (and they are not defeq as `(fun p : E × F ↦ (p.1, p.2))` is not defeq to the identity).
So, it is important to use the above incantation to maximize the applicability of theorems.
## Implementation notes
We want to talk about manifolds modelled on a vector space, but also on manifolds with
boundary, modelled on a half space (or even manifolds with corners). For the latter examples,
we still want to define smooth functions, tangent bundles, and so on. As smooth functions are
well defined on vector spaces or subsets of these, one could take for model space a subtype of a
vector space. With the drawback that the whole vector space itself (which is the most basic
example) is not directly a subtype of itself: the inclusion of `univ : Set E` in `Set E` would
show up in the definition, instead of `id`.
A good abstraction covering both cases it to have a vector
space `E` (with basic example the Euclidean space), a model space `H` (with basic example the upper
half space), and an embedding of `H` into `E` (which can be the identity for `H = E`, or
`Subtype.val` for manifolds with corners). We say that the pair `(E, H)` with their embedding is a
model with corners, and we encompass all the relevant properties (in particular the fact that the
image of `H` in `E` should have unique differentials) in the definition of `ModelWithCorners`.
We concentrate on `C^∞` manifolds: all the definitions work equally well for `C^n` manifolds, but
later on it is a pain to carry all over the smoothness parameter, especially when one wants to deal
with `C^k` functions as there would be additional conditions `k ≤ n` everywhere. Since one deals
almost all the time with `C^∞` (or analytic) manifolds, this seems to be a reasonable choice that
one could revisit later if needed. `C^k` manifolds are still available, but they should be called
using `HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid k I)` where `I` is the model with corners.
I have considered using the model with corners `I` as a typeclass argument, possibly `outParam`, to
get lighter notations later on, but it did not turn out right, as on `E × F` there are two natural
model with corners, the trivial (identity) one, and the product one, and they are not defeq and one
needs to indicate to Lean which one we want to use.
This means that when talking on objects on manifolds one will most often need to specify the model
with corners one is using. For instance, the tangent bundle will be `TangentBundle I M` and the
derivative will be `mfderiv I I' f`, instead of the more natural notations `TangentBundle 𝕜 M` and
`mfderiv 𝕜 f` (the field has to be explicit anyway, as some manifolds could be considered both as
real and complex manifolds).
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w u' v' w'
open Set Filter Function
open scoped Manifold Filter Topology
/-- The extended natural number `∞` -/
scoped[Manifold] notation "∞" => (⊤ : ℕ∞)
/-! ### Models with corners. -/
/-- A structure containing informations on the way a space `H` embeds in a
model vector space `E` over the field `𝕜`. This is all what is needed to
define a smooth manifold with model space `H`, and model vector space `E`.
-/
@[ext] -- Porting note(#5171): was nolint has_nonempty_instance
structure ModelWithCorners (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] extends
PartialEquiv H E where
source_eq : source = univ
unique_diff' : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 toPartialEquiv.target
continuous_toFun : Continuous toFun := by continuity
continuous_invFun : Continuous invFun := by continuity
#align model_with_corners ModelWithCorners
attribute [simp, mfld_simps] ModelWithCorners.source_eq
/-- A vector space is a model with corners. -/
def modelWithCornersSelf (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E E where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.refl E
source_eq := rfl
unique_diff' := uniqueDiffOn_univ
continuous_toFun := continuous_id
continuous_invFun := continuous_id
#align model_with_corners_self modelWithCornersSelf
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Manifold] notation "𝓘(" 𝕜 ", " E ")" => modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E
/-- A normed field is a model with corners. -/
scoped[Manifold] notation "𝓘(" 𝕜 ")" => modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 𝕜
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
namespace ModelWithCorners
/-- Coercion of a model with corners to a function. We don't use `e.toFun` because it is actually
`e.toPartialEquiv.toFun`, so `simp` will apply lemmas about `toPartialEquiv`. While we may want to
switch to this behavior later, doing it mid-port will break a lot of proofs. -/
@[coe] def toFun' (e : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E := e.toFun
instance : CoeFun (ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) fun _ => H → E := ⟨toFun'⟩
/-- The inverse to a model with corners, only registered as a `PartialEquiv`. -/
protected def symm : PartialEquiv E H :=
I.toPartialEquiv.symm
#align model_with_corners.symm ModelWithCorners.symm
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E :=
I
#align model_with_corners.simps.apply ModelWithCorners.Simps.apply
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : E → H :=
I.symm
#align model_with_corners.simps.symm_apply ModelWithCorners.Simps.symm_apply
initialize_simps_projections ModelWithCorners (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
-- Register a few lemmas to make sure that `simp` puts expressions in normal form
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toPartialEquiv_coe : (I.toPartialEquiv : H → E) = I :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.to_local_equiv_coe ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_coe (e : PartialEquiv H E) (a b c d) :
((ModelWithCorners.mk e a b c d : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E) = (e : H → E) :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.mk_coe ModelWithCorners.mk_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toPartialEquiv_coe_symm : (I.toPartialEquiv.symm : E → H) = I.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.to_local_equiv_coe_symm ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_symm (e : PartialEquiv H E) (a b c d) :
(ModelWithCorners.mk e a b c d : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H).symm = e.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.mk_symm ModelWithCorners.mk_symm
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous : Continuous I :=
I.continuous_toFun
#align model_with_corners.continuous ModelWithCorners.continuous
protected theorem continuousAt {x} : ContinuousAt I x :=
I.continuous.continuousAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_at ModelWithCorners.continuousAt
protected theorem continuousWithinAt {s x} : ContinuousWithinAt I s x :=
I.continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_within_at ModelWithCorners.continuousWithinAt
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_symm : Continuous I.symm :=
I.continuous_invFun
#align model_with_corners.continuous_symm ModelWithCorners.continuous_symm
theorem continuousAt_symm {x} : ContinuousAt I.symm x :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_at_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousAt_symm
theorem continuousWithinAt_symm {s x} : ContinuousWithinAt I.symm s x :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_within_at_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousWithinAt_symm
theorem continuousOn_symm {s} : ContinuousOn I.symm s :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousOn
#align model_with_corners.continuous_on_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousOn_symm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem target_eq : I.target = range (I : H → E) := by
rw [← image_univ, ← I.source_eq]
exact I.image_source_eq_target.symm
#align model_with_corners.target_eq ModelWithCorners.target_eq
protected theorem unique_diff : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (range I) :=
I.target_eq ▸ I.unique_diff'
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff ModelWithCorners.unique_diff
@[simp, mfld_simps]
protected theorem left_inv (x : H) : I.symm (I x) = x := by refine I.left_inv' ?_; simp
#align model_with_corners.left_inv ModelWithCorners.left_inv
protected theorem leftInverse : LeftInverse I.symm I :=
I.left_inv
#align model_with_corners.left_inverse ModelWithCorners.leftInverse
theorem injective : Injective I :=
I.leftInverse.injective
#align model_with_corners.injective ModelWithCorners.injective
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem symm_comp_self : I.symm ∘ I = id :=
I.leftInverse.comp_eq_id
#align model_with_corners.symm_comp_self ModelWithCorners.symm_comp_self
protected theorem rightInvOn : RightInvOn I.symm I (range I) :=
I.leftInverse.rightInvOn_range
#align model_with_corners.right_inv_on ModelWithCorners.rightInvOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
protected theorem right_inv {x : E} (hx : x ∈ range I) : I (I.symm x) = x :=
I.rightInvOn hx
#align model_with_corners.right_inv ModelWithCorners.right_inv
theorem preimage_image (s : Set H) : I ⁻¹' (I '' s) = s :=
I.injective.preimage_image s
#align model_with_corners.preimage_image ModelWithCorners.preimage_image
protected theorem image_eq (s : Set H) : I '' s = I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I := by
refine (I.toPartialEquiv.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage ?_).trans ?_
· rw [I.source_eq]; exact subset_univ _
· rw [inter_comm, I.target_eq, I.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm]
#align model_with_corners.image_eq ModelWithCorners.image_eq
protected theorem closedEmbedding : ClosedEmbedding I :=
I.leftInverse.closedEmbedding I.continuous_symm I.continuous
#align model_with_corners.closed_embedding ModelWithCorners.closedEmbedding
theorem isClosed_range : IsClosed (range I) :=
I.closedEmbedding.isClosed_range
#align model_with_corners.closed_range ModelWithCorners.isClosed_range
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-17")] alias closed_range := isClosed_range
theorem map_nhds_eq (x : H) : map I (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] I x :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.map_nhds_eq x
#align model_with_corners.map_nhds_eq ModelWithCorners.map_nhds_eq
theorem map_nhdsWithin_eq (s : Set H) (x : H) : map I (𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[I '' s] I x :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.map_nhdsWithin_eq s x
#align model_with_corners.map_nhds_within_eq ModelWithCorners.map_nhdsWithin_eq
theorem image_mem_nhdsWithin {x : H} {s : Set H} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : I '' s ∈ 𝓝[range I] I x :=
I.map_nhds_eq x ▸ image_mem_map hs
#align model_with_corners.image_mem_nhds_within ModelWithCorners.image_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem symm_map_nhdsWithin_image {x : H} {s : Set H} : map I.symm (𝓝[I '' s] I x) = 𝓝[s] x := by
rw [← I.map_nhdsWithin_eq, map_map, I.symm_comp_self, map_id]
#align model_with_corners.symm_map_nhds_within_image ModelWithCorners.symm_map_nhdsWithin_image
theorem symm_map_nhdsWithin_range (x : H) : map I.symm (𝓝[range I] I x) = 𝓝 x := by
rw [← I.map_nhds_eq, map_map, I.symm_comp_self, map_id]
#align model_with_corners.symm_map_nhds_within_range ModelWithCorners.symm_map_nhdsWithin_range
theorem unique_diff_preimage {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) := by
rw [inter_comm]
exact I.unique_diff.inter (hs.preimage I.continuous_invFun)
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_preimage ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_preimage
theorem unique_diff_preimage_source {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {e : PartialHomeomorph H β} :
UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (I.symm ⁻¹' e.source ∩ range I) :=
I.unique_diff_preimage e.open_source
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_preimage_source ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_preimage_source
theorem unique_diff_at_image {x : H} : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (range I) (I x) :=
I.unique_diff _ (mem_range_self _)
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_at_image ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_at_image
theorem symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff {X} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : H → X} {s : Set H}
{x : H} :
ContinuousWithinAt (f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (I x) ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.comp I.continuousWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
simp_rw [preimage_inter, preimage_preimage, I.left_inv, preimage_id', preimage_range,
inter_univ] at this
rwa [Function.comp.assoc, I.symm_comp_self] at this
· rw [← I.left_inv x] at h; exact h.comp I.continuousWithinAt_symm inter_subset_left
#align model_with_corners.symm_continuous_within_at_comp_right_iff ModelWithCorners.symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff
protected theorem locallyCompactSpace [LocallyCompactSpace E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) :
LocallyCompactSpace H := by
have : ∀ x : H, (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s => s ∈ 𝓝 (I x) ∧ IsCompact s)
fun s => I.symm '' (s ∩ range I) := fun x ↦ by
rw [← I.symm_map_nhdsWithin_range]
exact ((compact_basis_nhds (I x)).inf_principal _).map _
refine .of_hasBasis this ?_
rintro x s ⟨-, hsc⟩
exact (hsc.inter_right I.isClosed_range).image I.continuous_symm
#align model_with_corners.locally_compact ModelWithCorners.locallyCompactSpace
open TopologicalSpace
protected theorem secondCountableTopology [SecondCountableTopology E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) :
SecondCountableTopology H :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.secondCountableTopology
#align model_with_corners.second_countable_topology ModelWithCorners.secondCountableTopology
end ModelWithCorners
section
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- In the trivial model with corners, the associated `PartialEquiv` is the identity. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_partialEquiv : 𝓘(𝕜, E).toPartialEquiv = PartialEquiv.refl E :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_local_equiv modelWithCornersSelf_partialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_coe : (𝓘(𝕜, E) : E → E) = id :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_coe modelWithCornersSelf_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm : (𝓘(𝕜, E).symm : E → E) = id :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_coe_symm modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm
end
end
section ModelWithCornersProd
/-- Given two model_with_corners `I` on `(E, H)` and `I'` on `(E', H')`, we define the model with
corners `I.prod I'` on `(E × E', ModelProd H H')`. This appears in particular for the manifold
structure on the tangent bundle to a manifold modelled on `(E, H)`: it will be modelled on
`(E × E, H × E)`. See note [Manifold type tags] for explanation about `ModelProd H H'`
vs `H × H'`. -/
@[simps (config := .lemmasOnly)]
def ModelWithCorners.prod {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {E' : Type v'} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type w'} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E × E') (ModelProd H H') :=
{ I.toPartialEquiv.prod I'.toPartialEquiv with
toFun := fun x => (I x.1, I' x.2)
invFun := fun x => (I.symm x.1, I'.symm x.2)
source := { x | x.1 ∈ I.source ∧ x.2 ∈ I'.source }
source_eq := by simp only [setOf_true, mfld_simps]
unique_diff' := I.unique_diff'.prod I'.unique_diff'
continuous_toFun := I.continuous_toFun.prod_map I'.continuous_toFun
continuous_invFun := I.continuous_invFun.prod_map I'.continuous_invFun }
#align model_with_corners.prod ModelWithCorners.prod
/-- Given a finite family of `ModelWithCorners` `I i` on `(E i, H i)`, we define the model with
corners `pi I` on `(Π i, E i, ModelPi H)`. See note [Manifold type tags] for explanation about
`ModelPi H`. -/
def ModelWithCorners.pi {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι]
{E : ι → Type w} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)] {H : ι → Type u'}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (H i)] (I : ∀ i, ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E i) (H i)) :
ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (∀ i, E i) (ModelPi H) where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.pi fun i => (I i).toPartialEquiv
source_eq := by simp only [pi_univ, mfld_simps]
unique_diff' := UniqueDiffOn.pi ι E _ _ fun i _ => (I i).unique_diff'
continuous_toFun := continuous_pi fun i => (I i).continuous.comp (continuous_apply i)
continuous_invFun := continuous_pi fun i => (I i).continuous_symm.comp (continuous_apply i)
#align model_with_corners.pi ModelWithCorners.pi
/-- Special case of product model with corners, which is trivial on the second factor. This shows up
as the model to tangent bundles. -/
abbrev ModelWithCorners.tangent {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E × E) (ModelProd H E) :=
I.prod 𝓘(𝕜, E)
#align model_with_corners.tangent ModelWithCorners.tangent
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {F' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F']
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G'] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H}
{J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F G}
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_toPartialEquiv :
(I.prod J).toPartialEquiv = I.toPartialEquiv.prod J.toPartialEquiv :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_to_local_equiv modelWithCorners_prod_toPartialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_coe (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
(I.prod I' : _ × _ → _ × _) = Prod.map I I' :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_coe modelWithCorners_prod_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_coe_symm (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
(I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
((I.prod I').symm : _ × _ → _ × _) = Prod.map I.symm I'.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_coe_symm modelWithCorners_prod_coe_symm
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_prod : 𝓘(𝕜, E × F) = 𝓘(𝕜, E).prod 𝓘(𝕜, F) := by ext1 <;> simp
#align model_with_corners_self_prod modelWithCornersSelf_prod
theorem ModelWithCorners.range_prod : range (I.prod J) = range I ×ˢ range J := by
simp_rw [← ModelWithCorners.target_eq]; rfl
#align model_with_corners.range_prod ModelWithCorners.range_prod
end ModelWithCornersProd
section Boundaryless
/-- Property ensuring that the model with corners `I` defines manifolds without boundary. This
differs from the more general `BoundarylessManifold`, which requires every point on the manifold
to be an interior point. -/
class ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : Prop where
range_eq_univ : range I = univ
#align model_with_corners.boundaryless ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless
theorem ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] :
range I = univ := ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ
/-- If `I` is a `ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless` model, then it is a homeomorphism. -/
@[simps (config := {simpRhs := true})]
def ModelWithCorners.toHomeomorph {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] : H ≃ₜ E where
__ := I
left_inv := I.left_inv
right_inv _ := I.right_inv <| I.range_eq_univ.symm ▸ mem_univ _
/-- The trivial model with corners has no boundary -/
instance modelWithCornersSelf_boundaryless (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : (modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E).Boundaryless :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align model_with_corners_self_boundaryless modelWithCornersSelf_boundaryless
/-- If two model with corners are boundaryless, their product also is -/
instance ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ_prod {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] {E' : Type v'} [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type w'} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H')
[I'.Boundaryless] : (I.prod I').Boundaryless := by
constructor
dsimp [ModelWithCorners.prod, ModelProd]
rw [← prod_range_range_eq, ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ,
ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ, univ_prod_univ]
#align model_with_corners.range_eq_univ_prod ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ_prod
end Boundaryless
section contDiffGroupoid
/-! ### Smooth functions on models with corners -/
variable {m n : ℕ∞} {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M]
variable (n)
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the pregroupoid of `C^n` transformations of `H`
as the maps that are `C^n` when read in `E` through `I`. -/
def contDiffPregroupoid : Pregroupoid H where
property f s := ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
comp {f g u v} hf hg _ _ _ := by
have : I ∘ (g ∘ f) ∘ I.symm = (I ∘ g ∘ I.symm) ∘ I ∘ f ∘ I.symm := by ext x; simp
simp only [this]
refine hg.comp (hf.mono fun x ⟨hx1, hx2⟩ ↦ ⟨hx1.1, hx2⟩) ?_
rintro x ⟨hx1, _⟩
simp only [mfld_simps] at hx1 ⊢
exact hx1.2
id_mem := by
apply ContDiffOn.congr contDiff_id.contDiffOn
rintro x ⟨_, hx2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hx2 with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy]
simp only [mfld_simps]
locality {f u} _ H := by
apply contDiffOn_of_locally_contDiffOn
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hy2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← hx] at hy1 ⊢
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy1 ⊢
rcases H x hy1 with ⟨v, v_open, xv, hv⟩
have : I.symm ⁻¹' (u ∩ v) ∩ range I = I.symm ⁻¹' u ∩ range I ∩ I.symm ⁻¹' v := by
rw [preimage_inter, inter_assoc, inter_assoc]
congr 1
rw [inter_comm]
rw [this] at hv
exact ⟨I.symm ⁻¹' v, v_open.preimage I.continuous_symm, by simpa, hv⟩
congr {f g u} _ fg hf := by
apply hf.congr
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hy2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← hx] at hy1 ⊢
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy1 ⊢
rw [fg _ hy1]
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of invertible `C^n` transformations
of `H` as the invertible maps that are `C^n` when read in `E` through `I`. -/
def contDiffGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H :=
Pregroupoid.groupoid (contDiffPregroupoid n I)
#align cont_diff_groupoid contDiffGroupoid
variable {n}
/-- Inclusion of the groupoid of `C^n` local diffeos in the groupoid of `C^m` local diffeos when
`m ≤ n` -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_le (h : m ≤ n) : contDiffGroupoid n I ≤ contDiffGroupoid m I := by
rw [contDiffGroupoid, contDiffGroupoid]
apply groupoid_of_pregroupoid_le
intro f s hfs
exact ContDiffOn.of_le hfs h
#align cont_diff_groupoid_le contDiffGroupoid_le
/-- The groupoid of `0`-times continuously differentiable maps is just the groupoid of all
partial homeomorphisms -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_zero_eq : contDiffGroupoid 0 I = continuousGroupoid H := by
apply le_antisymm le_top
intro u _
-- we have to check that every partial homeomorphism belongs to `contDiffGroupoid 0 I`,
-- by unfolding its definition
change u ∈ contDiffGroupoid 0 I
rw [contDiffGroupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid, contDiffPregroupoid]
simp only [contDiffOn_zero]
constructor
· refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn (u.continuousOn.comp I.continuousOn_symm ?_)
exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
· refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn (u.symm.continuousOn.comp I.continuousOn_symm ?_)
exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
#align cont_diff_groupoid_zero_eq contDiffGroupoid_zero_eq
variable (n)
/-- An identity partial homeomorphism belongs to the `C^n` groupoid. -/
theorem ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s hs ∈ contDiffGroupoid n I := by
rw [contDiffGroupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid]
suffices h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (I ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) by
simp [h, contDiffPregroupoid]
have : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n id (univ : Set E) := contDiff_id.contDiffOn
exact this.congr_mono (fun x hx => I.right_inv hx.2) (subset_univ _)
#align of_set_mem_cont_diff_groupoid ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid
/-- The composition of a partial homeomorphism from `H` to `M` and its inverse belongs to
the `C^n` groupoid. -/
theorem symm_trans_mem_contDiffGroupoid (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) :
e.symm.trans e ∈ contDiffGroupoid n I :=
haveI : e.symm.trans e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.target e.open_target :=
PartialHomeomorph.symm_trans_self _
StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource _ (ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid n I e.open_target) this
#align symm_trans_mem_cont_diff_groupoid symm_trans_mem_contDiffGroupoid
variable {E' H' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [TopologicalSpace H']
/-- The product of two smooth partial homeomorphisms is smooth. -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_prod {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{e : PartialHomeomorph H H} {e' : PartialHomeomorph H' H'} (he : e ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I)
(he' : e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I') : e.prod e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ (I.prod I') := by
cases' he with he he_symm
cases' he' with he' he'_symm
simp only at he he_symm he' he'_symm
constructor <;> simp only [PartialEquiv.prod_source, PartialHomeomorph.prod_toPartialEquiv,
contDiffPregroupoid]
· have h3 := ContDiffOn.prod_map he he'
rw [← I.image_eq, ← I'.image_eq, prod_image_image_eq] at h3
rw [← (I.prod I').image_eq]
exact h3
· have h3 := ContDiffOn.prod_map he_symm he'_symm
rw [← I.image_eq, ← I'.image_eq, prod_image_image_eq] at h3
rw [← (I.prod I').image_eq]
exact h3
#align cont_diff_groupoid_prod contDiffGroupoid_prod
/-- The `C^n` groupoid is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (contDiffGroupoid n I) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr
(by
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
apply (contDiffGroupoid n I).mem_of_eqOnSource' _ _ _ hes
exact ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid n I hs)
end contDiffGroupoid
section analyticGroupoid
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M]
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of analytic transformations of `H`
as the maps that are analytic and map interior to interior when read in `E` through `I`. We also
explicitly define that they are `C^∞` on the whole domain, since we are only requiring
analyticity on the interior of the domain. -/
def analyticGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H :=
(contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) ⊓ Pregroupoid.groupoid
{ property := fun f s => AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)) ∧
(I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)).image (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) ⊆ interior (range I)
comp := fun {f g u v} hf hg _ _ _ => by
simp only [] at hf hg ⊢
have comp : I ∘ (g ∘ f) ∘ I.symm = (I ∘ g ∘ I.symm) ∘ I ∘ f ∘ I.symm := by ext x; simp
apply And.intro
· simp only [comp, preimage_inter]
refine hg.left.comp (hf.left.mono ?_) ?_
· simp only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_right]
rw [inter_assoc]
simp
· intro x hx
apply And.intro
· rw [mem_preimage, comp_apply, I.left_inv]
exact hx.left.right
· apply hf.right
rw [mem_image]
exact ⟨x, ⟨⟨hx.left.left, hx.right⟩, rfl⟩⟩
· simp only [comp]
rw [image_comp]
intro x hx
rw [mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨x', hx'⟩
refine hg.right ⟨x', And.intro ?_ hx'.right⟩
apply And.intro
· have hx'1 : x' ∈ ((v.preimage f).preimage (I.symm)).image (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) := by
refine image_subset (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) ?_ hx'.left
rw [preimage_inter]
refine Subset.trans ?_ (u.preimage I.symm).inter_subset_right
apply inter_subset_left
rcases hx'1 with ⟨x'', hx''⟩
rw [hx''.right.symm]
simp only [comp_apply, mem_preimage, I.left_inv]
exact hx''.left
· rw [mem_image] at hx'
rcases hx'.left with ⟨x'', hx''⟩
exact hf.right ⟨x'', ⟨⟨hx''.left.left.left, hx''.left.right⟩, hx''.right⟩⟩
id_mem := by
apply And.intro
· simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact AnalyticOn.congr isOpen_interior
(f := (1 : E →L[𝕜] E)) (fun x _ => (1 : E →L[𝕜] E).analyticAt x)
(fun z hz => (I.right_inv (interior_subset hz)).symm)
· intro x hx
simp only [id_comp, comp_apply, preimage_univ, univ_inter, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy.right, I.right_inv (interior_subset hy.left)]
exact hy.left
locality := fun {f u} _ h => by
simp only [] at h
simp only [AnalyticOn]
apply And.intro
· intro x hx
rcases h (I.symm x) (mem_preimage.mp hx.left) with ⟨v, hv⟩
exact hv.right.right.left x ⟨mem_preimage.mpr ⟨hx.left, hv.right.left⟩, hx.right⟩
· apply mapsTo'.mp
simp only [MapsTo]
intro x hx
rcases h (I.symm x) hx.left with ⟨v, hv⟩
apply hv.right.right.right
rw [mem_image]
have hx' := And.intro hx (mem_preimage.mpr hv.right.left)
rw [← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, ← inter_assoc, ← preimage_inter, inter_comm v u] at hx'
exact ⟨x, ⟨hx', rfl⟩⟩
congr := fun {f g u} hu fg hf => by
simp only [] at hf ⊢
apply And.intro
· refine AnalyticOn.congr (IsOpen.inter (hu.preimage I.continuous_symm) isOpen_interior)
hf.left ?_
intro z hz
simp only [comp_apply]
rw [fg (I.symm z) hz.left]
· intro x hx
apply hf.right
rw [mem_image] at hx ⊢
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, ⟨hy.left, ?_⟩⟩
rw [comp_apply, comp_apply, fg (I.symm y) hy.left.left] at hy
exact hy.right }
/-- An identity partial homeomorphism belongs to the analytic groupoid. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/SmoothManifoldWithCorners.lean | 755 | 778 | theorem ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s hs ∈ analyticGroupoid I := by |
rw [analyticGroupoid]
refine And.intro (ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid ∞ I hs) ?_
apply mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr
suffices h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)) ∧
(I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)).image (I ∘ I.symm) ⊆ interior (range I) by
simp only [PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_apply, id_comp, PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_toPartialEquiv,
PartialEquiv.ofSet_source, h, comp_apply, mem_range, image_subset_iff, true_and,
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_symm, PartialEquiv.ofSet_target, and_self]
intro x hx
refine mem_preimage.mpr ?_
rw [← I.right_inv (interior_subset hx.right)] at hx
exact hx.right
apply And.intro
· have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (1 : E →L[𝕜] E) (univ : Set E) := (fun x _ => (1 : E →L[𝕜] E).analyticAt x)
exact (this.mono (subset_univ (s.preimage (I.symm) ∩ interior (range I)))).congr
((hs.preimage I.continuous_symm).inter isOpen_interior)
fun z hz => (I.right_inv (interior_subset hz.right)).symm
· intro x hx
simp only [comp_apply, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy.right, I.right_inv (interior_subset hy.left.right)]
exact hy.left.right
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
#align_import topology.metric_space.hausdorff_distance from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bc91ed7093bf098d253401e69df601fc33dde156"
/-!
# Hausdorff distance
The Hausdorff distance on subsets of a metric (or emetric) space.
Given two subsets `s` and `t` of a metric space, their Hausdorff distance is the smallest `d`
such that any point `s` is within `d` of a point in `t`, and conversely. This quantity
is often infinite (think of `s` bounded and `t` unbounded), and therefore better
expressed in the setting of emetric spaces.
## Main definitions
This files introduces:
* `EMetric.infEdist x s`, the infimum edistance of a point `x` to a set `s` in an emetric space
* `EMetric.hausdorffEdist s t`, the Hausdorff edistance of two sets in an emetric space
* Versions of these notions on metric spaces, called respectively `Metric.infDist`
and `Metric.hausdorffDist`
## Main results
* `infEdist_closure`: the edistance to a set and its closure coincide
* `EMetric.mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero`: a point `x` belongs to the closure of `s` iff
`infEdist x s = 0`
* `IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist`: if `s` is compact and non-empty, there exists a point `y`
which attains this edistance
* `IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed`: every open set `U` can be written as the increasing union
of countably many closed subsets of `U`
* `hausdorffEdist_closure`: replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance
* `hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure`: two sets have Hausdorff edistance zero
iff their closures coincide
* the Hausdorff edistance is symmetric and satisfies the triangle inequality
* in particular, closed sets in an emetric space are an emetric space
(this is shown in `EMetricSpace.closeds.emetricspace`)
* versions of these notions on metric spaces
* `hausdorffEdist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded`: if two sets in a metric space
are nonempty and bounded in a metric space, they are at finite Hausdorff edistance.
## Tags
metric space, Hausdorff distance
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal Topology Set Filter Pointwise Bornology
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace EMetric
section InfEdist
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {x y : α} {s t : Set α} {Φ : α → β}
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
/-- The minimal edistance of a point to a set -/
def infEdist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ y ∈ s, edist x y
#align emetric.inf_edist EMetric.infEdist
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_empty : infEdist x ∅ = ∞ :=
iInf_emptyset
#align emetric.inf_edist_empty EMetric.infEdist_empty
theorem le_infEdist {d} : d ≤ infEdist x s ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, d ≤ edist x y := by
simp only [infEdist, le_iInf_iff]
#align emetric.le_inf_edist EMetric.le_infEdist
/-- The edist to a union is the minimum of the edists -/
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_union : infEdist x (s ∪ t) = infEdist x s ⊓ infEdist x t :=
iInf_union
#align emetric.inf_edist_union EMetric.infEdist_union
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_iUnion (f : ι → Set α) (x : α) : infEdist x (⋃ i, f i) = ⨅ i, infEdist x (f i) :=
iInf_iUnion f _
#align emetric.inf_edist_Union EMetric.infEdist_iUnion
lemma infEdist_biUnion {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Set α) (I : Set ι) (x : α) :
infEdist x (⋃ i ∈ I, f i) = ⨅ i ∈ I, infEdist x (f i) := by simp only [infEdist_iUnion]
/-- The edist to a singleton is the edistance to the single point of this singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_singleton : infEdist x {y} = edist x y :=
iInf_singleton
#align emetric.inf_edist_singleton EMetric.infEdist_singleton
/-- The edist to a set is bounded above by the edist to any of its points -/
theorem infEdist_le_edist_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y :=
iInf₂_le y h
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_edist_of_mem EMetric.infEdist_le_edist_of_mem
/-- If a point `x` belongs to `s`, then its edist to `s` vanishes -/
theorem infEdist_zero_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infEdist x s = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| @edist_self _ _ x ▸ infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h
#align emetric.inf_edist_zero_of_mem EMetric.infEdist_zero_of_mem
/-- The edist is antitone with respect to inclusion. -/
theorem infEdist_anti (h : s ⊆ t) : infEdist x t ≤ infEdist x s :=
iInf_le_iInf_of_subset h
#align emetric.inf_edist_anti EMetric.infEdist_anti
/-- The edist to a set is `< r` iff there exists a point in the set at edistance `< r` -/
theorem infEdist_lt_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : infEdist x s < r ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y < r := by
simp_rw [infEdist, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
#align emetric.inf_edist_lt_iff EMetric.infEdist_lt_iff
/-- The edist of `x` to `s` is bounded by the sum of the edist of `y` to `s` and
the edist from `x` to `y` -/
theorem infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist : infEdist x s ≤ infEdist y s + edist x y :=
calc
⨅ z ∈ s, edist x z ≤ ⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z + edist x y :=
iInf₂_mono fun z _ => (edist_triangle _ _ _).trans_eq (add_comm _ _)
_ = (⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z) + edist x y := by simp only [ENNReal.iInf_add]
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_inf_edist_add_edist EMetric.infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist
theorem infEdist_le_edist_add_infEdist : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y + infEdist y s := by
rw [add_comm]
exact infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_edist_add_inf_edist EMetric.infEdist_le_edist_add_infEdist
theorem edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam (hy : y ∈ s) : edist x y ≤ infEdist x s + diam s := by
simp_rw [infEdist, ENNReal.iInf_add]
refine le_iInf₂ fun i hi => ?_
calc
edist x y ≤ edist x i + edist i y := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ edist x i + diam s := add_le_add le_rfl (edist_le_diam_of_mem hi hy)
#align emetric.edist_le_inf_edist_add_ediam EMetric.edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam
/-- The edist to a set depends continuously on the point -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_infEdist : Continuous fun x => infEdist x s :=
continuous_of_le_add_edist 1 (by simp) <| by
simp only [one_mul, infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist, forall₂_true_iff]
#align emetric.continuous_inf_edist EMetric.continuous_infEdist
/-- The edist to a set and to its closure coincide -/
theorem infEdist_closure : infEdist x (closure s) = infEdist x s := by
refine le_antisymm (infEdist_anti subset_closure) ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos h => ?_
have ε0 : 0 < (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using εpos
have : infEdist x (closure s) < infEdist x (closure s) + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right h.ne ε0.ne'
obtain ⟨y : α, ycs : y ∈ closure s, hy : edist x y < infEdist x (closure s) + ↑ε / 2⟩ :=
infEdist_lt_iff.mp this
obtain ⟨z : α, zs : z ∈ s, dyz : edist y z < ↑ε / 2⟩ := EMetric.mem_closure_iff.1 ycs (ε / 2) ε0
calc
infEdist x s ≤ edist x z := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem zs
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ infEdist x (closure s) + ε / 2 + ε / 2 := add_le_add (le_of_lt hy) (le_of_lt dyz)
_ = infEdist x (closure s) + ↑ε := by rw [add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves]
#align emetric.inf_edist_closure EMetric.infEdist_closure
/-- A point belongs to the closure of `s` iff its infimum edistance to this set vanishes -/
theorem mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero : x ∈ closure s ↔ infEdist x s = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← infEdist_closure]
exact infEdist_zero_of_mem h,
fun h =>
EMetric.mem_closure_iff.2 fun ε εpos => infEdist_lt_iff.mp <| by rwa [h]⟩
#align emetric.mem_closure_iff_inf_edist_zero EMetric.mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum edistance to this set vanishes -/
theorem mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed (h : IsClosed s) : x ∈ s ↔ infEdist x s = 0 := by
rw [← mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, h.closure_eq]
#align emetric.mem_iff_inf_edist_zero_of_closed EMetric.mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed
/-- The infimum edistance of a point to a set is positive if and only if the point is not in the
closure of the set. -/
theorem infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} :
0 < infEdist x E ↔ x ∉ closure E := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align emetric.inf_edist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure EMetric.infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure
theorem infEdist_closure_pos_iff_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} :
0 < infEdist x (closure E) ↔ x ∉ closure E := by
rw [infEdist_closure, infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure]
#align emetric.inf_edist_closure_pos_iff_not_mem_closure EMetric.infEdist_closure_pos_iff_not_mem_closure
theorem exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∃ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε ∧ ENNReal.ofReal ε < infEdist x E := by
rw [← infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure, ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_real_btwn] at h
rcases h with ⟨ε, ⟨_, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩⟩
exact ⟨ε, ⟨ENNReal.ofReal_pos.mp ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩
#align emetric.exists_real_pos_lt_inf_edist_of_not_mem_closure EMetric.exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure
theorem disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infEdist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : r < infEdist x s) :
Disjoint (closedBall x r) s := by
rw [disjoint_left]
intro y hy h'y
apply lt_irrefl (infEdist x s)
calc
infEdist x s ≤ edist x y := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h'y
_ ≤ r := by rwa [mem_closedBall, edist_comm] at hy
_ < infEdist x s := h
#align emetric.disjoint_closed_ball_of_lt_inf_edist EMetric.disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infEdist
/-- The infimum edistance is invariant under isometries -/
theorem infEdist_image (hΦ : Isometry Φ) : infEdist (Φ x) (Φ '' t) = infEdist x t := by
simp only [infEdist, iInf_image, hΦ.edist_eq]
#align emetric.inf_edist_image EMetric.infEdist_image
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem infEdist_smul {M} [SMul M α] [IsometricSMul M α] (c : M) (x : α) (s : Set α) :
infEdist (c • x) (c • s) = infEdist x s :=
infEdist_image (isometry_smul _ _)
#align emetric.inf_edist_smul EMetric.infEdist_smul
#align emetric.inf_edist_vadd EMetric.infEdist_vadd
theorem _root_.IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed {U : Set α} (hU : IsOpen U) :
∃ F : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, IsClosed (F n)) ∧ (∀ n, F n ⊆ U) ∧ ⋃ n, F n = U ∧ Monotone F := by
obtain ⟨a, a_pos, a_lt_one⟩ : ∃ a : ℝ≥0∞, 0 < a ∧ a < 1 := exists_between zero_lt_one
let F := fun n : ℕ => (fun x => infEdist x Uᶜ) ⁻¹' Ici (a ^ n)
have F_subset : ∀ n, F n ⊆ U := fun n x hx ↦ by
by_contra h
have : infEdist x Uᶜ ≠ 0 := ((ENNReal.pow_pos a_pos _).trans_le hx).ne'
exact this (infEdist_zero_of_mem h)
refine ⟨F, fun n => IsClosed.preimage continuous_infEdist isClosed_Ici, F_subset, ?_, ?_⟩
· show ⋃ n, F n = U
refine Subset.antisymm (by simp only [iUnion_subset_iff, F_subset, forall_const]) fun x hx => ?_
have : ¬x ∈ Uᶜ := by simpa using hx
rw [mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed hU.isClosed_compl] at this
have B : 0 < infEdist x Uᶜ := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using this
have : Filter.Tendsto (fun n => a ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one a_lt_one
rcases ((tendsto_order.1 this).2 _ B).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_Ici, mem_preimage]
exact ⟨n, hn.le⟩
show Monotone F
intro m n hmn x hx
simp only [F, mem_Ici, mem_preimage] at hx ⊢
apply le_trans (pow_le_pow_right_of_le_one' a_lt_one.le hmn) hx
#align is_open.exists_Union_is_closed IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed
theorem _root_.IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist (hs : IsCompact s) (hne : s.Nonempty) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, infEdist x s = edist x y := by
have A : Continuous fun y => edist x y := continuous_const.edist continuous_id
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ := hs.exists_isMinOn hne A.continuousOn
exact ⟨y, ys, le_antisymm (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem ys) (by rwa [le_infEdist])⟩
#align is_compact.exists_inf_edist_eq_edist IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist
theorem exists_pos_forall_lt_edist (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (hst : Disjoint s t) :
∃ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (r : ℝ≥0∞) < edist x y := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· use 1
simp
obtain ⟨x, hx, h⟩ := hs.exists_isMinOn hne continuous_infEdist.continuousOn
have : 0 < infEdist x t :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.2 fun H => hst.le_bot ⟨hx, (mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed ht).mpr H⟩
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 this with ⟨r, h₀, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, ENNReal.coe_pos.mp h₀, fun y hy z hz => hr.trans_le <| le_infEdist.1 (h hy) z hz⟩
#align emetric.exists_pos_forall_lt_edist EMetric.exists_pos_forall_lt_edist
end InfEdist
/-! ### The Hausdorff distance as a function into `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between two sets is the smallest `r` such that each set
is contained in the `r`-neighborhood of the other one -/
irreducible_def hausdorffEdist {α : Type u} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] (s t : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
(⨆ x ∈ s, infEdist x t) ⊔ ⨆ y ∈ t, infEdist y s
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist EMetric.hausdorffEdist
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_def EMetric.hausdorffEdist_def
section HausdorffEdist
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {x y : α} {s t u : Set α} {Φ : α → β}
/-- The Hausdorff edistance of a set to itself vanishes. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_self : hausdorffEdist s s = 0 := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, sup_idem, ENNReal.iSup_eq_zero]
exact fun x hx => infEdist_zero_of_mem hx
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_self EMetric.hausdorffEdist_self
/-- The Haudorff edistances of `s` to `t` and of `t` to `s` coincide. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_comm : hausdorffEdist s t = hausdorffEdist t s := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def]; apply sup_comm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_comm EMetric.hausdorffEdist_comm
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff edistance by bounding the edistance of any point
in each set to the other set -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, infEdist x t ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, infEdist x s ≤ r) : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ r := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, sup_le_iff, iSup_le_iff]
exact ⟨H1, H2⟩
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_le_of_inf_edist EMetric.hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff edistance by exhibiting, for any point in each set,
another point in the other set at controlled distance -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, edist x y ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y ≤ r) : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ r := by
refine hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist (fun x xs ↦ ?_) (fun x xt ↦ ?_)
· rcases H1 x xs with ⟨y, yt, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem yt) hy
· rcases H2 x xt with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem ys) hy
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_le_of_mem_edist EMetric.hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist
/-- The distance to a set is controlled by the Hausdorff distance. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/HausdorffDistance.lean | 318 | 321 | theorem infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infEdist x t ≤ hausdorffEdist s t := by |
rw [hausdorffEdist_def]
refine le_trans ?_ le_sup_left
exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) x h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# (Pre)images of intervals
In this file we prove a bunch of trivial lemmas like “if we add `a` to all points of `[b, c]`,
then we get `[a + b, a + c]`”. For the functions `x ↦ x ± a`, `x ↦ a ± x`, and `x ↦ -x` we prove
lemmas about preimages and images of all intervals. We also prove a few lemmas about images under
`x ↦ a * x`, `x ↦ x * a` and `x ↦ x⁻¹`.
-/
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Binary pointwise operations
Note that the subset operations below only cover the cases with the largest possible intervals on
the LHS: to conclude that `Ioo a b * Ioo c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (c * d)`, you can use monotonicity of `*`
and `Set.Ico_mul_Ioc_subset`.
TODO: repeat these lemmas for the generality of `mul_le_mul` (which assumes nonnegativity), which
the unprimed names have been reserved for
-/
section ContravariantLE
variable [Mul α] [Preorder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LE.le]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Icc c d ⊆ Icc (a * c) (b * d) := by
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_le_mul' hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iic b ⊆ Iic (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ici b ⊆ Ici (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
end ContravariantLE
section ContravariantLT
variable [Mul α] [PartialOrder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LT.lt]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Icc c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ioc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Ioc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ioc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Ioc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Ioc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Ioc c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iio_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iio_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iio b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
@[to_additive Iio_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iio_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iio a * Iic b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ioi_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ioi_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ioi a * Ici b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ioi_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ioi_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ioi b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
end ContravariantLT
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c : α)
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ici : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ici Set.preimage_const_add_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioi : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioi Set.preimage_const_add_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iic Set.preimage_const_add_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iio Set.preimage_const_add_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Icc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Icc Set.preimage_const_add_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ico : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ico Set.preimage_const_add_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioc Set.preimage_const_add_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioo : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioo Set.preimage_const_add_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ici : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ici Set.preimage_add_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioi : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioi Set.preimage_add_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iic Set.preimage_add_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iio Set.preimage_add_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Icc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Icc Set.preimage_add_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ico : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ico Set.preimage_add_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioc Set.preimage_add_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioo : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioo Set.preimage_add_const_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ -x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ici : -Ici a = Iic (-a) :=
ext fun _x => le_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ici Set.preimage_neg_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iic : -Iic a = Ici (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_le
#align set.preimage_neg_Iic Set.preimage_neg_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioi : -Ioi a = Iio (-a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioi Set.preimage_neg_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iio : -Iio a = Ioi (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_lt
#align set.preimage_neg_Iio Set.preimage_neg_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Icc : -Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Icc Set.preimage_neg_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ico : -Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ico Set.preimage_neg_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioc : -Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioc Set.preimage_neg_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioo : -Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioo Set.preimage_neg_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x - a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ici Set.preimage_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iic Set.preimage_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iio Set.preimage_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Icc Set.preimage_sub_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ico : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ico Set.preimage_sub_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioo : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Iic (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ici Set.preimage_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Ici (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iic Set.preimage_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iio Set.preimage_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Icc Set.preimage_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ico Set.preimage_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) '' Iic b = Iic (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iic Set.image_const_add_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) '' Iio b = Iio (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iio Set.image_const_add_Iio
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) '' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iic Set.image_add_const_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) '' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iio Set.image_add_const_Iio
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ -x`
-/
theorem image_neg_Ici : Neg.neg '' Ici a = Iic (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ici Set.image_neg_Ici
theorem image_neg_Iic : Neg.neg '' Iic a = Ici (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iic Set.image_neg_Iic
theorem image_neg_Ioi : Neg.neg '' Ioi a = Iio (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioi Set.image_neg_Ioi
theorem image_neg_Iio : Neg.neg '' Iio a = Ioi (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iio Set.image_neg_Iio
theorem image_neg_Icc : Neg.neg '' Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Icc Set.image_neg_Icc
theorem image_neg_Ico : Neg.neg '' Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ico Set.image_neg_Ico
theorem image_neg_Ioc : Neg.neg '' Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioc Set.image_neg_Ioc
theorem image_neg_Ioo : Neg.neg '' Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioo Set.image_neg_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) '' Ici b = Iic (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ici Set.image_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) '' Iic b = Ici (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Iic Set.image_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioi Set.image_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) '' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Iio Set.image_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) '' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Icc Set.image_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) '' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ico Set.image_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioc Set.image_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioo Set.image_const_sub_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x - a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) '' Ici b = Ici (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ici Set.image_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) '' Iic b = Iic (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Iic Set.image_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) '' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ioi Set.image_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) '' Iio b = Iio (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Iio Set.image_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) '' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Icc Set.image_sub_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ico : (fun x => x - a) '' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ico Set.image_sub_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ioc : (fun x => x - a) '' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ioc Set.image_sub_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ioo : (fun x => x - a) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ioo Set.image_sub_const_Ioo
/-!
### Bijections
-/
theorem Iic_add_bij : BijOn (· + a) (Iic b) (Iic (b + a)) :=
image_add_const_Iic a b ▸ (add_left_injective _).injOn.bijOn_image
#align set.Iic_add_bij Set.Iic_add_bij
theorem Iio_add_bij : BijOn (· + a) (Iio b) (Iio (b + a)) :=
image_add_const_Iio a b ▸ (add_left_injective _).injOn.bijOn_image
#align set.Iio_add_bij Set.Iio_add_bij
end OrderedAddCommGroup
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_uIcc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b - a, c - a]] := by
simp only [← Icc_min_max, preimage_const_add_Icc, min_sub_sub_right, max_sub_sub_right]
#align set.preimage_const_add_uIcc Set.preimage_const_add_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_uIcc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b - a, c - a]] := by
simpa only [add_comm] using preimage_const_add_uIcc a b c
#align set.preimage_add_const_uIcc Set.preimage_add_const_uIcc
-- TODO: Why is the notation `-[[a, b]]` broken?
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_uIcc : @Neg.neg (Set α) Set.neg [[a, b]] = [[-a, -b]] := by
simp only [← Icc_min_max, preimage_neg_Icc, min_neg_neg, max_neg_neg]
#align set.preimage_neg_uIcc Set.preimage_neg_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_uIcc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b + a, c + a]] := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_uIcc Set.preimage_sub_const_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_uIcc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[a - b, a - c]] := by
simp_rw [← Icc_min_max, preimage_const_sub_Icc]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, min_add_add_left, max_add_add_left, min_neg_neg, max_neg_neg]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_uIcc Set.preimage_const_sub_uIcc
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this module `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_uIcc : (fun x => a + x) '' [[b, c]] = [[a + b, a + c]] := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_uIcc Set.image_const_add_uIcc
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_uIcc : (fun x => x + a) '' [[b, c]] = [[b + a, c + a]] := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_uIcc Set.image_add_const_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_uIcc : (fun x => a - x) '' [[b, c]] = [[a - b, a - c]] := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_uIcc Set.image_const_sub_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_uIcc : (fun x => x - a) '' [[b, c]] = [[b - a, c - a]] := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm]
#align set.image_sub_const_uIcc Set.image_sub_const_uIcc
theorem image_neg_uIcc : Neg.neg '' [[a, b]] = [[-a, -b]] := by simp
#align set.image_neg_uIcc Set.image_neg_uIcc
variable {a b c d}
/-- If `[c, d]` is a subinterval of `[a, b]`, then the distance between `c` and `d` is less than or
equal to that of `a` and `b` -/
theorem abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc (h : [[c, d]] ⊆ [[a, b]]) : |d - c| ≤ |b - a| := by
rw [← max_sub_min_eq_abs, ← max_sub_min_eq_abs]
rw [uIcc_subset_uIcc_iff_le] at h
exact sub_le_sub h.2 h.1
#align set.abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc Set.abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc
/-- If `c ∈ [a, b]`, then the distance between `a` and `c` is less than or equal to
that of `a` and `b` -/
theorem abs_sub_left_of_mem_uIcc (h : c ∈ [[a, b]]) : |c - a| ≤ |b - a| :=
abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc <| uIcc_subset_uIcc_left h
#align set.abs_sub_left_of_mem_uIcc Set.abs_sub_left_of_mem_uIcc
/-- If `x ∈ [a, b]`, then the distance between `c` and `b` is less than or equal to
that of `a` and `b` -/
theorem abs_sub_right_of_mem_uIcc (h : c ∈ [[a, b]]) : |b - c| ≤ |b - a| :=
abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc <| uIcc_subset_uIcc_right h
#align set.abs_sub_right_of_mem_uIcc Set.abs_sub_right_of_mem_uIcc
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
/-!
### Multiplication and inverse in a field
-/
section LinearOrderedField
variable [LinearOrderedField α] {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iio (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iio Set.preimage_mul_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioi (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iic (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iic Set.preimage_mul_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ici (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ici Set.preimage_mul_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioo (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ico (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ico Set.preimage_mul_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Icc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Icc Set.preimage_mul_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iio a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iic a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ici a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (b / c) (a / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ico (b / c) (a / c) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ioc (b / c) (a / c) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (b / c) (a / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iio (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iio Set.preimage_const_mul_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioi (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iic (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iic Set.preimage_const_mul_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ici (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ici Set.preimage_const_mul_Ici
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 705 | 706 | theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioo (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) := by | simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Basic
#align_import analysis.normed.group.hom from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3c4225288b55380a90df078ebae0991080b12393"
/-!
# Normed groups homomorphisms
This file gathers definitions and elementary constructions about bounded group homomorphisms
between normed (abelian) groups (abbreviated to "normed group homs").
The main lemmas relate the boundedness condition to continuity and Lipschitzness.
The main construction is to endow the type of normed group homs between two given normed groups
with a group structure and a norm, giving rise to a normed group structure. We provide several
simple constructions for normed group homs, like kernel, range and equalizer.
Some easy other constructions are related to subgroups of normed groups.
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0` we start setting up the
theory of `SeminormedAddGroupHom` and we specialize to `NormedAddGroupHom` when needed.
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal
-- TODO: migrate to the new morphism / morphism_class style
/-- A morphism of seminormed abelian groups is a bounded group homomorphism. -/
structure NormedAddGroupHom (V W : Type*) [SeminormedAddCommGroup V]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup W] where
/-- The function underlying a `NormedAddGroupHom` -/
toFun : V → W
/-- A `NormedAddGroupHom` is additive. -/
map_add' : ∀ v₁ v₂, toFun (v₁ + v₂) = toFun v₁ + toFun v₂
/-- A `NormedAddGroupHom` is bounded. -/
bound' : ∃ C, ∀ v, ‖toFun v‖ ≤ C * ‖v‖
#align normed_add_group_hom NormedAddGroupHom
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable {V W : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [SeminormedAddCommGroup W]
{f g : NormedAddGroupHom V W}
/-- Associate to a group homomorphism a bounded group homomorphism under a norm control condition.
See `AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom'` for a version that uses `ℝ≥0` for the bound. -/
def mkNormedAddGroupHom (f : V →+ W) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀ v, ‖f v‖ ≤ C * ‖v‖) : NormedAddGroupHom V W :=
{ f with bound' := ⟨C, h⟩ }
#align add_monoid_hom.mk_normed_add_group_hom AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom
/-- Associate to a group homomorphism a bounded group homomorphism under a norm control condition.
See `AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom` for a version that uses `ℝ` for the bound. -/
def mkNormedAddGroupHom' (f : V →+ W) (C : ℝ≥0) (hC : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C * ‖x‖₊) :
NormedAddGroupHom V W :=
{ f with bound' := ⟨C, hC⟩ }
#align add_monoid_hom.mk_normed_add_group_hom' AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom'
end AddMonoidHom
theorem exists_pos_bound_of_bound {V W : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup W] {f : V → W} (M : ℝ) (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖) :
∃ N, 0 < N ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ N * ‖x‖ :=
⟨max M 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right _ _), fun x =>
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖ := h x
_ ≤ max M 1 * ‖x‖ := by gcongr; apply le_max_left
⟩
#align exists_pos_bound_of_bound exists_pos_bound_of_bound
namespace NormedAddGroupHom
variable {V V₁ V₂ V₃ : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [SeminormedAddCommGroup V₁]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup V₂] [SeminormedAddCommGroup V₃]
variable {f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂}
/-- A Lipschitz continuous additive homomorphism is a normed additive group homomorphism. -/
def ofLipschitz (f : V₁ →+ V₂) {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂ :=
f.mkNormedAddGroupHom K fun x ↦ by simpa only [map_zero, dist_zero_right] using h.dist_le_mul x 0
instance funLike : FunLike (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) V₁ V₂ where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' := fun f g h => by cases f; cases g; congr
-- Porting note: moved this declaration up so we could get a `FunLike` instance sooner.
instance toAddMonoidHomClass : AddMonoidHomClass (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) V₁ V₂ where
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_zero f := (AddMonoidHom.mk' f.toFun f.map_add').map_zero
initialize_simps_projections NormedAddGroupHom (toFun → apply)
theorem coe_inj (H : (f : V₁ → V₂) = g) : f = g := by
cases f; cases g; congr
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_inj NormedAddGroupHom.coe_inj
theorem coe_injective : @Function.Injective (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (V₁ → V₂) toFun := by
apply coe_inj
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_injective NormedAddGroupHom.coe_injective
theorem coe_inj_iff : f = g ↔ (f : V₁ → V₂) = g :=
⟨congr_arg _, coe_inj⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_inj_iff NormedAddGroupHom.coe_inj_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext (H : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
coe_inj <| funext H
#align normed_add_group_hom.ext NormedAddGroupHom.ext
theorem ext_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨by rintro rfl x; rfl, ext⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.ext_iff NormedAddGroupHom.ext_iff
variable (f g)
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe : f.toFun = f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.to_fun_eq_coe NormedAddGroupHom.toFun_eq_coe
-- Porting note: removed `simp` because `simpNF` complains the LHS doesn't simplify.
theorem coe_mk (f) (h₁) (h₂) (h₃) : ⇑(⟨f, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) = f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_mk NormedAddGroupHom.coe_mk
@[simp]
theorem coe_mkNormedAddGroupHom (f : V₁ →+ V₂) (C) (hC) : ⇑(f.mkNormedAddGroupHom C hC) = f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_mk_normed_add_group_hom NormedAddGroupHom.coe_mkNormedAddGroupHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_mkNormedAddGroupHom' (f : V₁ →+ V₂) (C) (hC) : ⇑(f.mkNormedAddGroupHom' C hC) = f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_mk_normed_add_group_hom' NormedAddGroupHom.coe_mkNormedAddGroupHom'
/-- The group homomorphism underlying a bounded group homomorphism. -/
def toAddMonoidHom (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : V₁ →+ V₂ :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' f f.map_add'
#align normed_add_group_hom.to_add_monoid_hom NormedAddGroupHom.toAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAddMonoidHom : ⇑f.toAddMonoidHom = f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_to_add_monoid_hom NormedAddGroupHom.coe_toAddMonoidHom
theorem toAddMonoidHom_injective :
Function.Injective (@NormedAddGroupHom.toAddMonoidHom V₁ V₂ _ _) := fun f g h =>
coe_inj <| by rw [← coe_toAddMonoidHom f, ← coe_toAddMonoidHom g, h]
#align normed_add_group_hom.to_add_monoid_hom_injective NormedAddGroupHom.toAddMonoidHom_injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_toAddMonoidHom (f) (h₁) (h₂) :
(⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩ : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂).toAddMonoidHom = AddMonoidHom.mk' f h₁ :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.mk_to_add_monoid_hom NormedAddGroupHom.mk_toAddMonoidHom
theorem bound : ∃ C, 0 < C ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ :=
let ⟨_C, hC⟩ := f.bound'
exists_pos_bound_of_bound _ hC
#align normed_add_group_hom.bound NormedAddGroupHom.bound
theorem antilipschitz_of_norm_ge {K : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖) : AntilipschitzWith K f :=
AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_dist fun x y => by simpa only [dist_eq_norm, map_sub] using h (x - y)
#align normed_add_group_hom.antilipschitz_of_norm_ge NormedAddGroupHom.antilipschitz_of_norm_ge
/-- A normed group hom is surjective on the subgroup `K` with constant `C` if every element
`x` of `K` has a preimage whose norm is bounded above by `C*‖x‖`. This is a more
abstract version of `f` having a right inverse defined on `K` with operator norm
at most `C`. -/
def SurjectiveOnWith (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (K : AddSubgroup V₂) (C : ℝ) : Prop :=
∀ h ∈ K, ∃ g, f g = h ∧ ‖g‖ ≤ C * ‖h‖
#align normed_add_group_hom.surjective_on_with NormedAddGroupHom.SurjectiveOnWith
theorem SurjectiveOnWith.mono {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : AddSubgroup V₂} {C C' : ℝ}
(h : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C) (H : C ≤ C') : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C' := by
intro k k_in
rcases h k k_in with ⟨g, rfl, hg⟩
use g, rfl
by_cases Hg : ‖f g‖ = 0
· simpa [Hg] using hg
· exact hg.trans (by gcongr)
#align normed_add_group_hom.surjective_on_with.mono NormedAddGroupHom.SurjectiveOnWith.mono
theorem SurjectiveOnWith.exists_pos {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : AddSubgroup V₂} {C : ℝ}
(h : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C) : ∃ C' > 0, f.SurjectiveOnWith K C' := by
refine ⟨|C| + 1, ?_, ?_⟩
· linarith [abs_nonneg C]
· apply h.mono
linarith [le_abs_self C]
#align normed_add_group_hom.surjective_on_with.exists_pos NormedAddGroupHom.SurjectiveOnWith.exists_pos
theorem SurjectiveOnWith.surjOn {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : AddSubgroup V₂} {C : ℝ}
(h : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C) : Set.SurjOn f Set.univ K := fun x hx =>
(h x hx).imp fun _a ⟨ha, _⟩ => ⟨Set.mem_univ _, ha⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.surjective_on_with.surj_on NormedAddGroupHom.SurjectiveOnWith.surjOn
/-! ### The operator norm -/
/-- The operator norm of a seminormed group homomorphism is the inf of all its bounds. -/
def opNorm (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
sInf { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ }
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm
instance hasOpNorm : Norm (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨opNorm⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.has_op_norm NormedAddGroupHom.hasOpNorm
theorem norm_def : ‖f‖ = sInf { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ } :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.norm_def NormedAddGroupHom.norm_def
-- So that invocations of `le_csInf` make sense: we show that the set of
-- bounds is nonempty and bounded below.
theorem bounds_nonempty {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} :
∃ c, c ∈ { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ } :=
let ⟨M, hMp, hMb⟩ := f.bound
⟨M, le_of_lt hMp, hMb⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.bounds_nonempty NormedAddGroupHom.bounds_nonempty
theorem bounds_bddBelow {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} :
BddBelow { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ } :=
⟨0, fun _ ⟨hn, _⟩ => hn⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.bounds_bdd_below NormedAddGroupHom.bounds_bddBelow
theorem opNorm_nonneg : 0 ≤ ‖f‖ :=
le_csInf bounds_nonempty fun _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => hx
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_nonneg NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_nonneg
/-- The fundamental property of the operator norm: `‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖`. -/
theorem le_opNorm (x : V₁) : ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ := by
obtain ⟨C, _Cpos, hC⟩ := f.bound
replace hC := hC x
by_cases h : ‖x‖ = 0
· rwa [h, mul_zero] at hC ⊢
have hlt : 0 < ‖x‖ := lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg x) (Ne.symm h)
exact
(div_le_iff hlt).mp
(le_csInf bounds_nonempty fun c ⟨_, hc⟩ => (div_le_iff hlt).mpr <| by apply hc)
#align normed_add_group_hom.le_op_norm NormedAddGroupHom.le_opNorm
theorem le_opNorm_of_le {c : ℝ} {x} (h : ‖x‖ ≤ c) : ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * c :=
le_trans (f.le_opNorm x) (by gcongr; exact f.opNorm_nonneg)
#align normed_add_group_hom.le_op_norm_of_le NormedAddGroupHom.le_opNorm_of_le
theorem le_of_opNorm_le {c : ℝ} (h : ‖f‖ ≤ c) (x : V₁) : ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ :=
(f.le_opNorm x).trans (by gcongr)
#align normed_add_group_hom.le_of_op_norm_le NormedAddGroupHom.le_of_opNorm_le
/-- continuous linear maps are Lipschitz continuous. -/
theorem lipschitz : LipschitzWith ⟨‖f‖, opNorm_nonneg f⟩ f :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun x y => by
rw [dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm, ← map_sub]
apply le_opNorm
#align normed_add_group_hom.lipschitz NormedAddGroupHom.lipschitz
protected theorem uniformContinuous (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : UniformContinuous f :=
f.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
#align normed_add_group_hom.uniform_continuous NormedAddGroupHom.uniformContinuous
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : Continuous f :=
f.uniformContinuous.continuous
#align normed_add_group_hom.continuous NormedAddGroupHom.continuous
theorem ratio_le_opNorm (x : V₁) : ‖f x‖ / ‖x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
div_le_of_nonneg_of_le_mul (norm_nonneg _) f.opNorm_nonneg (le_opNorm _ _)
#align normed_add_group_hom.ratio_le_op_norm NormedAddGroupHom.ratio_le_opNorm
/-- If one controls the norm of every `f x`, then one controls the norm of `f`. -/
theorem opNorm_le_bound {M : ℝ} (hMp : 0 ≤ M) (hM : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖) : ‖f‖ ≤ M :=
csInf_le bounds_bddBelow ⟨hMp, hM⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_le_bound NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_le_bound
theorem opNorm_eq_of_bounds {M : ℝ} (M_nonneg : 0 ≤ M) (h_above : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖)
(h_below : ∀ N ≥ 0, (∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ N * ‖x‖) → M ≤ N) : ‖f‖ = M :=
le_antisymm (f.opNorm_le_bound M_nonneg h_above)
((le_csInf_iff NormedAddGroupHom.bounds_bddBelow ⟨M, M_nonneg, h_above⟩).mpr
fun N ⟨N_nonneg, hN⟩ => h_below N N_nonneg hN)
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_eq_of_bounds NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_eq_of_bounds
theorem opNorm_le_of_lipschitz {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzWith K f) :
‖f‖ ≤ K :=
f.opNorm_le_bound K.2 fun x => by simpa only [dist_zero_right, map_zero] using hf.dist_le_mul x 0
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_le_of_lipschitz NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_le_of_lipschitz
/-- If a bounded group homomorphism map is constructed from a group homomorphism via the constructor
`AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom`, then its norm is bounded by the bound given to the constructor
if it is nonnegative. -/
theorem mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le (f : V₁ →+ V₂) {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C) (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) :
‖f.mkNormedAddGroupHom C h‖ ≤ C :=
opNorm_le_bound _ hC h
#align normed_add_group_hom.mk_normed_add_group_hom_norm_le NormedAddGroupHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le
/-- If a bounded group homomorphism map is constructed from a group homomorphism via the constructor
`NormedAddGroupHom.ofLipschitz`, then its norm is bounded by the bound given to the constructor. -/
theorem ofLipschitz_norm_le (f : V₁ →+ V₂) {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) :
‖ofLipschitz f h‖ ≤ K :=
mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le f K.coe_nonneg _
/-- If a bounded group homomorphism map is constructed from a group homomorphism
via the constructor `AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom`, then its norm is bounded by the bound
given to the constructor or zero if this bound is negative. -/
theorem mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le' (f : V₁ →+ V₂) {C : ℝ} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) :
‖f.mkNormedAddGroupHom C h‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
opNorm_le_bound _ (le_max_right _ _) fun x =>
(h x).trans <| by gcongr; apply le_max_left
#align normed_add_group_hom.mk_normed_add_group_hom_norm_le' NormedAddGroupHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le'
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le := mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le
#align add_monoid_hom.mk_normed_add_group_hom_norm_le AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le' := mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le'
#align add_monoid_hom.mk_normed_add_group_hom_norm_le' AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le'
/-! ### Addition of normed group homs -/
/-- Addition of normed group homs. -/
instance add : Add (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨fun f g =>
(f.toAddMonoidHom + g.toAddMonoidHom).mkNormedAddGroupHom (‖f‖ + ‖g‖) fun v =>
calc
‖f v + g v‖ ≤ ‖f v‖ + ‖g v‖ := norm_add_le _ _
_ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖v‖ + ‖g‖ * ‖v‖ := by gcongr <;> apply le_opNorm
_ = (‖f‖ + ‖g‖) * ‖v‖ := by rw [add_mul]
⟩
/-- The operator norm satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem opNorm_add_le : ‖f + g‖ ≤ ‖f‖ + ‖g‖ :=
mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le _ (add_nonneg (opNorm_nonneg _) (opNorm_nonneg _)) _
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_add_le NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_add_le
-- Porting note: this library note doesn't seem to apply anymore
/-
library_note "addition on function coercions"/--
Terms containing `@has_add.add (has_coe_to_fun.F ...) pi.has_add`
seem to cause leanchecker to [crash due to an out-of-memory
condition](https://github.com/leanprover-community/lean/issues/543).
As a workaround, we add a type annotation: `(f + g : V₁ → V₂)`
-/
-/
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_add NormedAddGroupHom.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) :
(f + g) v = f v + g v :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.add_apply NormedAddGroupHom.add_apply
/-! ### The zero normed group hom -/
instance zero : Zero (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨(0 : V₁ →+ V₂).mkNormedAddGroupHom 0 (by simp)⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The norm of the `0` operator is `0`. -/
theorem opNorm_zero : ‖(0 : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂)‖ = 0 :=
le_antisymm
(csInf_le bounds_bddBelow
⟨ge_of_eq rfl, fun _ =>
le_of_eq
(by
rw [zero_mul]
exact norm_zero)⟩)
(opNorm_nonneg _)
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_zero NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_zero
/-- For normed groups, an operator is zero iff its norm vanishes. -/
theorem opNorm_zero_iff {V₁ V₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V₁] [NormedAddCommGroup V₂]
{f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} : ‖f‖ = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun hn =>
ext fun x =>
norm_le_zero_iff.1
(calc
_ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ := le_opNorm _ _
_ = _ := by rw [hn, zero_mul]
))
fun hf => by rw [hf, opNorm_zero]
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_zero_iff NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) = 0 :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_zero NormedAddGroupHom.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (v : V₁) : (0 : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) v = 0 :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.zero_apply NormedAddGroupHom.zero_apply
variable {f g}
/-! ### The identity normed group hom -/
variable (V)
/-- The identity as a continuous normed group hom. -/
@[simps!]
def id : NormedAddGroupHom V V :=
(AddMonoidHom.id V).mkNormedAddGroupHom 1 (by simp [le_refl])
#align normed_add_group_hom.id NormedAddGroupHom.id
/-- The norm of the identity is at most `1`. It is in fact `1`, except when the norm of every
element vanishes, where it is `0`. (Since we are working with seminorms this can happen even if the
space is non-trivial.) It means that one can not do better than an inequality in general. -/
theorem norm_id_le : ‖(id V : NormedAddGroupHom V V)‖ ≤ 1 :=
opNorm_le_bound _ zero_le_one fun x => by simp
#align normed_add_group_hom.norm_id_le NormedAddGroupHom.norm_id_le
/-- If there is an element with norm different from `0`, then the norm of the identity equals `1`.
(Since we are working with seminorms supposing that the space is non-trivial is not enough.) -/
theorem norm_id_of_nontrivial_seminorm (h : ∃ x : V, ‖x‖ ≠ 0) : ‖id V‖ = 1 :=
le_antisymm (norm_id_le V) <| by
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h
have := (id V).ratio_le_opNorm x
rwa [id_apply, div_self hx] at this
#align normed_add_group_hom.norm_id_of_nontrivial_seminorm NormedAddGroupHom.norm_id_of_nontrivial_seminorm
/-- If a normed space is non-trivial, then the norm of the identity equals `1`. -/
theorem norm_id {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [Nontrivial V] : ‖id V‖ = 1 := by
refine norm_id_of_nontrivial_seminorm V ?_
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_ne (0 : V)
exact ⟨x, ne_of_gt (norm_pos_iff.2 hx)⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.norm_id NormedAddGroupHom.norm_id
theorem coe_id : (NormedAddGroupHom.id V : V → V) = _root_.id :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_id NormedAddGroupHom.coe_id
/-! ### The negation of a normed group hom -/
/-- Opposite of a normed group hom. -/
instance neg : Neg (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨fun f => (-f.toAddMonoidHom).mkNormedAddGroupHom ‖f‖ fun v => by simp [le_opNorm f v]⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(-f) = -f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_neg NormedAddGroupHom.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) :
(-f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) v = -f v :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.neg_apply NormedAddGroupHom.neg_apply
theorem opNorm_neg (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ‖-f‖ = ‖f‖ := by
simp only [norm_def, coe_neg, norm_neg, Pi.neg_apply]
#align normed_add_group_hom.op_norm_neg NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_neg
/-! ### Subtraction of normed group homs -/
/-- Subtraction of normed group homs. -/
instance sub : Sub (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨fun f g =>
{ f.toAddMonoidHom - g.toAddMonoidHom with
bound' := by
simp only [AddMonoidHom.sub_apply, AddMonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, sub_eq_add_neg]
exact (f + -g).bound' }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(f - g) = f - g :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_sub NormedAddGroupHom.coe_sub
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) :
(f - g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) v = f v - g v :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.sub_apply NormedAddGroupHom.sub_apply
/-! ### Scalar actions on normed group homs -/
section SMul
variable {R R' : Type*} [MonoidWithZero R] [DistribMulAction R V₂] [PseudoMetricSpace R]
[BoundedSMul R V₂] [MonoidWithZero R'] [DistribMulAction R' V₂] [PseudoMetricSpace R']
[BoundedSMul R' V₂]
instance smul : SMul R (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) where
smul r f :=
{ toFun := r • ⇑f
map_add' := (r • f.toAddMonoidHom).map_add'
bound' :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := f.bound'
⟨dist r 0 * b, fun x => by
have := dist_smul_pair r (f x) (f 0)
rw [map_zero, smul_zero, dist_zero_right, dist_zero_right] at this
rw [mul_assoc]
refine this.trans ?_
gcongr
exact hb x⟩ }
@[simp]
theorem coe_smul (r : R) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(r • f) = r • ⇑f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_smul NormedAddGroupHom.coe_smul
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply (r : R) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) : (r • f) v = r • f v :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.smul_apply NormedAddGroupHom.smul_apply
instance smulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' V₂] :
SMulCommClass R R' (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) where
smul_comm _ _ _ := ext fun _ => smul_comm _ _ _
instance isScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' V₂] :
IsScalarTower R R' (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) where
smul_assoc _ _ _ := ext fun _ => smul_assoc _ _ _
instance isCentralScalar [DistribMulAction Rᵐᵒᵖ V₂] [IsCentralScalar R V₂] :
IsCentralScalar R (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) where
op_smul_eq_smul _ _ := ext fun _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _
end SMul
instance nsmul : SMul ℕ (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) where
smul n f :=
{ toFun := n • ⇑f
map_add' := (n • f.toAddMonoidHom).map_add'
bound' :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := f.bound'
⟨n • b, fun v => by
rw [Pi.smul_apply, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
exact (norm_nsmul_le _ _).trans (by gcongr; apply hb)⟩ }
#align normed_add_group_hom.has_nat_scalar NormedAddGroupHom.nsmul
@[simp]
theorem coe_nsmul (r : ℕ) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(r • f) = r • ⇑f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_nsmul NormedAddGroupHom.coe_nsmul
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_apply (r : ℕ) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) : (r • f) v = r • f v :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.nsmul_apply NormedAddGroupHom.nsmul_apply
instance zsmul : SMul ℤ (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) where
smul z f :=
{ toFun := z • ⇑f
map_add' := (z • f.toAddMonoidHom).map_add'
bound' :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := f.bound'
⟨‖z‖ • b, fun v => by
rw [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
exact (norm_zsmul_le _ _).trans (by gcongr; apply hb)⟩ }
#align normed_add_group_hom.has_int_scalar NormedAddGroupHom.zsmul
@[simp]
theorem coe_zsmul (r : ℤ) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : ⇑(r • f) = r • ⇑f :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_zsmul NormedAddGroupHom.coe_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_apply (r : ℤ) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) : (r • f) v = r • f v :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.zsmul_apply NormedAddGroupHom.zsmul_apply
/-! ### Normed group structure on normed group homs -/
/-- Homs between two given normed groups form a commutative additive group. -/
instance toAddCommGroup : AddCommGroup (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
coe_injective.addCommGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
fun _ _ => rfl
/-- Normed group homomorphisms themselves form a seminormed group with respect to
the operator norm. -/
instance toSeminormedAddCommGroup : SeminormedAddCommGroup (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
{ toFun := opNorm
map_zero' := opNorm_zero
neg' := opNorm_neg
add_le' := opNorm_add_le }
#align normed_add_group_hom.to_seminormed_add_comm_group NormedAddGroupHom.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
/-- Normed group homomorphisms themselves form a normed group with respect to
the operator norm. -/
instance toNormedAddCommGroup {V₁ V₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V₁] [NormedAddCommGroup V₂] :
NormedAddCommGroup (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
{ toFun := opNorm
map_zero' := opNorm_zero
neg' := opNorm_neg
add_le' := opNorm_add_le
eq_zero_of_map_eq_zero' := fun _f => opNorm_zero_iff.1 }
#align normed_add_group_hom.to_normed_add_comm_group NormedAddGroupHom.toNormedAddCommGroup
/-- Coercion of a `NormedAddGroupHom` is an `AddMonoidHom`. Similar to `AddMonoidHom.coeFn`. -/
@[simps]
def coeAddHom : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂ →+ V₁ → V₂ where
toFun := DFunLike.coe
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_fn_add_hom NormedAddGroupHom.coeAddHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : V₁ → V₂) :=
map_sum coeAddHom f s
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_sum NormedAddGroupHom.coe_sum
theorem sum_apply {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (v : V₁) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) v = ∑ i ∈ s, f i v := by simp only [coe_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
#align normed_add_group_hom.sum_apply NormedAddGroupHom.sum_apply
/-! ### Module structure on normed group homs -/
instance distribMulAction {R : Type*} [MonoidWithZero R] [DistribMulAction R V₂]
[PseudoMetricSpace R] [BoundedSMul R V₂] : DistribMulAction R (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
Function.Injective.distribMulAction coeAddHom coe_injective coe_smul
instance module {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Module R V₂] [PseudoMetricSpace R] [BoundedSMul R V₂] :
Module R (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
Function.Injective.module _ coeAddHom coe_injective coe_smul
/-! ### Composition of normed group homs -/
/-- The composition of continuous normed group homs. -/
@[simps!]
protected def comp (g : NormedAddGroupHom V₂ V₃) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :
NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₃ :=
(g.toAddMonoidHom.comp f.toAddMonoidHom).mkNormedAddGroupHom (‖g‖ * ‖f‖) fun v =>
calc
‖g (f v)‖ ≤ ‖g‖ * ‖f v‖ := le_opNorm _ _
_ ≤ ‖g‖ * (‖f‖ * ‖v‖) := by gcongr; apply le_opNorm
_ = ‖g‖ * ‖f‖ * ‖v‖ := by rw [mul_assoc]
#align normed_add_group_hom.comp NormedAddGroupHom.comp
theorem norm_comp_le (g : NormedAddGroupHom V₂ V₃) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :
‖g.comp f‖ ≤ ‖g‖ * ‖f‖ :=
mkNormedAddGroupHom_norm_le _ (mul_nonneg (opNorm_nonneg _) (opNorm_nonneg _)) _
#align normed_add_group_hom.norm_comp_le NormedAddGroupHom.norm_comp_le
theorem norm_comp_le_of_le {g : NormedAddGroupHom V₂ V₃} {C₁ C₂ : ℝ} (hg : ‖g‖ ≤ C₂)
(hf : ‖f‖ ≤ C₁) : ‖g.comp f‖ ≤ C₂ * C₁ :=
le_trans (norm_comp_le g f) <| by gcongr; exact le_trans (norm_nonneg _) hg
#align normed_add_group_hom.norm_comp_le_of_le NormedAddGroupHom.norm_comp_le_of_le
theorem norm_comp_le_of_le' {g : NormedAddGroupHom V₂ V₃} (C₁ C₂ C₃ : ℝ) (h : C₃ = C₂ * C₁)
(hg : ‖g‖ ≤ C₂) (hf : ‖f‖ ≤ C₁) : ‖g.comp f‖ ≤ C₃ := by
rw [h]
exact norm_comp_le_of_le hg hf
#align normed_add_group_hom.norm_comp_le_of_le' NormedAddGroupHom.norm_comp_le_of_le'
/-- Composition of normed groups hom as an additive group morphism. -/
def compHom : NormedAddGroupHom V₂ V₃ →+ NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂ →+ NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₃ :=
AddMonoidHom.mk'
(fun g =>
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => g.comp f)
(by
intros
ext
exact map_add g _ _))
(by
intros
ext
simp only [comp_apply, Pi.add_apply, Function.comp_apply, AddMonoidHom.add_apply,
AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply, coe_add])
#align normed_add_group_hom.comp_hom NormedAddGroupHom.compHom
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₂ V₃) : f.comp (0 : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) = 0 := by
ext
exact map_zero f
#align normed_add_group_hom.comp_zero NormedAddGroupHom.comp_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : (0 : NormedAddGroupHom V₂ V₃).comp f = 0 := by
ext
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.zero_comp NormedAddGroupHom.zero_comp
theorem comp_assoc {V₄ : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V₄] (h : NormedAddGroupHom V₃ V₄)
(g : NormedAddGroupHom V₂ V₃) (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) := by
ext
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.comp_assoc NormedAddGroupHom.comp_assoc
theorem coe_comp (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (g : NormedAddGroupHom V₂ V₃) :
(g.comp f : V₁ → V₃) = (g : V₂ → V₃) ∘ (f : V₁ → V₂) :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_comp NormedAddGroupHom.coe_comp
end NormedAddGroupHom
namespace NormedAddGroupHom
variable {V W V₁ V₂ V₃ : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [SeminormedAddCommGroup W]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup V₁] [SeminormedAddCommGroup V₂] [SeminormedAddCommGroup V₃]
/-- The inclusion of an `AddSubgroup`, as bounded group homomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def incl (s : AddSubgroup V) : NormedAddGroupHom s V where
toFun := (Subtype.val : s → V)
map_add' v w := AddSubgroup.coe_add _ _ _
bound' := ⟨1, fun v => by rw [one_mul, AddSubgroup.coe_norm]⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.incl NormedAddGroupHom.incl
theorem norm_incl {V' : AddSubgroup V} (x : V') : ‖incl _ x‖ = ‖x‖ :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.norm_incl NormedAddGroupHom.norm_incl
/-!### Kernel -/
section Kernels
variable (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (g : NormedAddGroupHom V₂ V₃)
/-- The kernel of a bounded group homomorphism. Naturally endowed with a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance. -/
def ker : AddSubgroup V₁ :=
f.toAddMonoidHom.ker
#align normed_add_group_hom.ker NormedAddGroupHom.ker
theorem mem_ker (v : V₁) : v ∈ f.ker ↔ f v = 0 := by
erw [f.toAddMonoidHom.mem_ker, coe_toAddMonoidHom]
#align normed_add_group_hom.mem_ker NormedAddGroupHom.mem_ker
/-- Given a normed group hom `f : V₁ → V₂` satisfying `g.comp f = 0` for some `g : V₂ → V₃`,
the corestriction of `f` to the kernel of `g`. -/
@[simps]
def ker.lift (h : g.comp f = 0) : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ g.ker where
toFun v := ⟨f v, by rw [g.mem_ker, ← comp_apply g f, h, zero_apply]⟩
map_add' v w := by simp only [map_add, AddSubmonoid.mk_add_mk]
bound' := f.bound'
#align normed_add_group_hom.ker.lift NormedAddGroupHom.ker.lift
@[simp]
theorem ker.incl_comp_lift (h : g.comp f = 0) : (incl g.ker).comp (ker.lift f g h) = f := by
ext
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.ker.incl_comp_lift NormedAddGroupHom.ker.incl_comp_lift
@[simp]
theorem ker_zero : (0 : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂).ker = ⊤ := by
ext
simp [mem_ker]
#align normed_add_group_hom.ker_zero NormedAddGroupHom.ker_zero
theorem coe_ker : (f.ker : Set V₁) = (f : V₁ → V₂) ⁻¹' {0} :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.coe_ker NormedAddGroupHom.coe_ker
theorem isClosed_ker {V₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V₂] (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :
IsClosed (f.ker : Set V₁) :=
f.coe_ker ▸ IsClosed.preimage f.continuous (T1Space.t1 0)
#align normed_add_group_hom.is_closed_ker NormedAddGroupHom.isClosed_ker
end Kernels
/-! ### Range -/
section Range
variable (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (g : NormedAddGroupHom V₂ V₃)
/-- The image of a bounded group homomorphism. Naturally endowed with a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance. -/
def range : AddSubgroup V₂ :=
f.toAddMonoidHom.range
#align normed_add_group_hom.range NormedAddGroupHom.range
theorem mem_range (v : V₂) : v ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ w, f w = v := Iff.rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.mem_range NormedAddGroupHom.mem_range
@[simp]
theorem mem_range_self (v : V₁) : f v ∈ f.range :=
⟨v, rfl⟩
#align normed_add_group_hom.mem_range_self NormedAddGroupHom.mem_range_self
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Hom.lean | 797 | 799 | theorem comp_range : (g.comp f).range = AddSubgroup.map g.toAddMonoidHom f.range := by |
erw [AddMonoidHom.map_range]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.HomeomorphBall
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.calculus from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f9dd3204df14a0749cd456fac1e6849dfe7d2b88"
/-!
# Calculus in inner product spaces
In this file we prove that the inner product and square of the norm in an inner space are
infinitely `ℝ`-smooth. In order to state these results, we need a `NormedSpace ℝ E`
instance. Though we can deduce this structure from `InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E`, this instance may be
not definitionally equal to some other “natural” instance. So, we assume `[NormedSpace ℝ E]`.
We also prove that functions to a `EuclideanSpace` are (higher) differentiable if and only if
their components are. This follows from the corresponding fact for finite product of normed spaces,
and from the equivalence of norms in finite dimensions.
## TODO
The last part of the file should be generalized to `PiLp`.
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter
open scoped Classical Topology
section DerivInner
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
variable (𝕜) [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- Derivative of the inner product. -/
def fderivInnerCLM (p : E × E) : E × E →L[ℝ] 𝕜 :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.deriv p
#align fderiv_inner_clm fderivInnerCLM
@[simp]
theorem fderivInnerCLM_apply (p x : E × E) : fderivInnerCLM 𝕜 p x = ⟪p.1, x.2⟫ + ⟪x.1, p.2⟫ :=
rfl
#align fderiv_inner_clm_apply fderivInnerCLM_apply
variable {𝕜} -- Porting note: Lean 3 magically switches back to `{𝕜}` here
theorem contDiff_inner {n} : ContDiff ℝ n fun p : E × E => ⟪p.1, p.2⟫ :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.contDiff
#align cont_diff_inner contDiff_inner
theorem contDiffAt_inner {p : E × E} {n} : ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun p : E × E => ⟪p.1, p.2⟫) p :=
ContDiff.contDiffAt contDiff_inner
#align cont_diff_at_inner contDiffAt_inner
theorem differentiable_inner : Differentiable ℝ fun p : E × E => ⟪p.1, p.2⟫ :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.differentiableAt
#align differentiable_inner differentiable_inner
variable (𝕜)
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G] {f g : G → E} {f' g' : G →L[ℝ] E}
{s : Set G} {x : G} {n : ℕ∞}
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.inner (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n f s x) (hg : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n g s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) s x :=
contDiffAt_inner.comp_contDiffWithinAt x (hf.prod hg)
#align cont_diff_within_at.inner ContDiffWithinAt.inner
nonrec theorem ContDiffAt.inner (hf : ContDiffAt ℝ n f x) (hg : ContDiffAt ℝ n g x) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) x :=
hf.inner 𝕜 hg
#align cont_diff_at.inner ContDiffAt.inner
theorem ContDiffOn.inner (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s) (hg : ContDiffOn ℝ n g s) :
ContDiffOn ℝ n (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).inner 𝕜 (hg x hx)
#align cont_diff_on.inner ContDiffOn.inner
theorem ContDiff.inner (hf : ContDiff ℝ n f) (hg : ContDiff ℝ n g) :
ContDiff ℝ n fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫ :=
contDiff_inner.comp (hf.prod hg)
#align cont_diff.inner ContDiff.inner
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.inner (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) ((fderivInnerCLM 𝕜 (f x, g x)).comp <| f'.prod g') s
x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.hasFDerivAt (f x, g x)).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x (hf.prod hg)
#align has_fderiv_within_at.inner HasFDerivWithinAt.inner
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.inner (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) ((fderivInnerCLM 𝕜 (f x, g x)).comp <| f'.prod g') x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.hasStrictFDerivAt (f x, g x)).comp x (hf.prod hg)
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.inner HasStrictFDerivAt.inner
theorem HasFDerivAt.inner (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) ((fderivInnerCLM 𝕜 (f x, g x)).comp <| f'.prod g') x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.hasFDerivAt (f x, g x)).comp x (hf.prod hg)
#align has_fderiv_at.inner HasFDerivAt.inner
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Calculus.lean | 109 | 112 | theorem HasDerivWithinAt.inner {f g : ℝ → E} {f' g' : E} {s : Set ℝ} {x : ℝ}
(hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) (⟪f x, g'⟫ + ⟪f', g x⟫) s x := by |
simpa using (hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.inner 𝕜 hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).hasDerivWithinAt
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Applicative
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Forall2
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Functor
#align_import control.traversable.instances from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"18a5306c091183ac90884daa9373fa3b178e8607"
/-!
# LawfulTraversable instances
This file provides instances of `LawfulTraversable` for types from the core library: `Option`,
`List` and `Sum`.
-/
universe u v
section Option
open Functor
variable {F G : Type u → Type u}
variable [Applicative F] [Applicative G]
variable [LawfulApplicative F] [LawfulApplicative G]
theorem Option.id_traverse {α} (x : Option α) : Option.traverse (pure : α → Id α) x = x := by
cases x <;> rfl
#align option.id_traverse Option.id_traverse
| Mathlib/Control/Traversable/Instances.lean | 35 | 38 | theorem Option.comp_traverse {α β γ} (f : β → F γ) (g : α → G β) (x : Option α) :
Option.traverse (Comp.mk ∘ (f <$> ·) ∘ g) x =
Comp.mk (Option.traverse f <$> Option.traverse g x) := by |
cases x <;> simp! [functor_norm] <;> rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineEquiv
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.midpoint from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# Midpoint of a segment
## Main definitions
* `midpoint R x y`: midpoint of the segment `[x, y]`. We define it for `x` and `y`
in a module over a ring `R` with invertible `2`.
* `AddMonoidHom.ofMapMidpoint`: construct an `AddMonoidHom` given a map `f` such that
`f` sends zero to zero and midpoints to midpoints.
## Main theorems
* `midpoint_eq_iff`: `z` is the midpoint of `[x, y]` if and only if `x + y = z + z`,
* `midpoint_unique`: `midpoint R x y` does not depend on `R`;
* `midpoint x y` is linear both in `x` and `y`;
* `pointReflection_midpoint_left`, `pointReflection_midpoint_right`:
`Equiv.pointReflection (midpoint R x y)` swaps `x` and `y`.
We do not mark most lemmas as `@[simp]` because it is hard to tell which side is simpler.
## Tags
midpoint, AddMonoidHom
-/
open AffineMap AffineEquiv
section
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*} [Ring R] [Invertible (2 : R)] [AddCommGroup V]
[Module R V] [AddTorsor V P] [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- `midpoint x y` is the midpoint of the segment `[x, y]`. -/
def midpoint (x y : P) : P :=
lineMap x y (⅟ 2 : R)
#align midpoint midpoint
variable {R} {x y z : P}
@[simp]
theorem AffineMap.map_midpoint (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (a b : P) :
f (midpoint R a b) = midpoint R (f a) (f b) :=
f.apply_lineMap a b _
#align affine_map.map_midpoint AffineMap.map_midpoint
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.map_midpoint (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') (a b : P) :
f (midpoint R a b) = midpoint R (f a) (f b) :=
f.apply_lineMap a b _
#align affine_equiv.map_midpoint AffineEquiv.map_midpoint
theorem AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left (x y : P) :
pointReflection R (midpoint R x y) x = y := by
rw [midpoint, pointReflection_apply, lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub, vadd_vadd, ← add_smul, ← two_mul,
mul_invOf_self, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
#align affine_equiv.point_reflection_midpoint_left AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left
@[simp] -- Porting note: added variant with `Equiv.pointReflection` for `simp`
theorem Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left (x y : P) :
(Equiv.pointReflection (midpoint R x y)) x = y := by
rw [midpoint, pointReflection_apply, lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub, vadd_vadd, ← add_smul, ← two_mul,
mul_invOf_self, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
theorem midpoint_comm (x y : P) : midpoint R x y = midpoint R y x := by
rw [midpoint, ← lineMap_apply_one_sub, one_sub_invOf_two, midpoint]
#align midpoint_comm midpoint_comm
theorem AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_right (x y : P) :
pointReflection R (midpoint R x y) y = x := by
rw [midpoint_comm, AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left]
#align affine_equiv.point_reflection_midpoint_right AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_right
@[simp] -- Porting note: added variant with `Equiv.pointReflection` for `simp`
theorem Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_right (x y : P) :
(Equiv.pointReflection (midpoint R x y)) y = x := by
rw [midpoint_comm, Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left]
theorem midpoint_vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P) :
midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ midpoint R p₃ p₄ = midpoint R (p₁ -ᵥ p₃) (p₂ -ᵥ p₄) :=
lineMap_vsub_lineMap _ _ _ _ _
#align midpoint_vsub_midpoint midpoint_vsub_midpoint
theorem midpoint_vadd_midpoint (v v' : V) (p p' : P) :
midpoint R v v' +ᵥ midpoint R p p' = midpoint R (v +ᵥ p) (v' +ᵥ p') :=
lineMap_vadd_lineMap _ _ _ _ _
#align midpoint_vadd_midpoint midpoint_vadd_midpoint
theorem midpoint_eq_iff {x y z : P} : midpoint R x y = z ↔ pointReflection R z x = y :=
eq_comm.trans
((injective_pointReflection_left_of_module R x).eq_iff'
(AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left x y)).symm
#align midpoint_eq_iff midpoint_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_pointReflection_left (x y : P) :
midpoint R (Equiv.pointReflection x y) y = x :=
midpoint_eq_iff.2 <| Equiv.pointReflection_involutive _ _
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_pointReflection_right (x y : P) :
midpoint R y (Equiv.pointReflection x y) = x :=
midpoint_eq_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_vsub_left (p₁ p₂ : P) : midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ p₁ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) :=
lineMap_vsub_left _ _ _
#align midpoint_vsub_left midpoint_vsub_left
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_vsub_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [midpoint_comm, midpoint_vsub_left]
#align midpoint_vsub_right midpoint_vsub_right
@[simp]
theorem left_vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₁ -ᵥ midpoint R p₁ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) :=
left_vsub_lineMap _ _ _
#align left_vsub_midpoint left_vsub_midpoint
@[simp]
theorem right_vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₂ -ᵥ midpoint R p₁ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) := by
rw [midpoint_comm, left_vsub_midpoint]
#align right_vsub_midpoint right_vsub_midpoint
theorem midpoint_vsub (p₁ p₂ p : P) :
midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ p = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₁ -ᵥ p) + (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₂ -ᵥ p) := by
rw [← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₁ p p₂, smul_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, ← smul_neg,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, add_assoc, invOf_two_smul_add_invOf_two_smul, ← vadd_vsub_assoc,
midpoint_comm, midpoint, lineMap_apply]
#align midpoint_vsub midpoint_vsub
theorem vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ p : P) :
p -ᵥ midpoint R p₁ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p -ᵥ p₁) + (⅟ 2 : R) • (p -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, midpoint_vsub, neg_add, ← smul_neg, ← smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
#align vsub_midpoint vsub_midpoint
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_sub_left (v₁ v₂ : V) : midpoint R v₁ v₂ - v₁ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (v₂ - v₁) :=
midpoint_vsub_left v₁ v₂
#align midpoint_sub_left midpoint_sub_left
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_sub_right (v₁ v₂ : V) : midpoint R v₁ v₂ - v₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (v₁ - v₂) :=
midpoint_vsub_right v₁ v₂
#align midpoint_sub_right midpoint_sub_right
@[simp]
theorem left_sub_midpoint (v₁ v₂ : V) : v₁ - midpoint R v₁ v₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (v₁ - v₂) :=
left_vsub_midpoint v₁ v₂
#align left_sub_midpoint left_sub_midpoint
@[simp]
theorem right_sub_midpoint (v₁ v₂ : V) : v₂ - midpoint R v₁ v₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (v₂ - v₁) :=
right_vsub_midpoint v₁ v₂
#align right_sub_midpoint right_sub_midpoint
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_eq_left_iff {x y : P} : midpoint R x y = x ↔ x = y := by
rw [midpoint_eq_iff, pointReflection_self]
#align midpoint_eq_left_iff midpoint_eq_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem left_eq_midpoint_iff {x y : P} : x = midpoint R x y ↔ x = y := by
rw [eq_comm, midpoint_eq_left_iff]
#align left_eq_midpoint_iff left_eq_midpoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_eq_right_iff {x y : P} : midpoint R x y = y ↔ x = y := by
rw [midpoint_comm, midpoint_eq_left_iff, eq_comm]
#align midpoint_eq_right_iff midpoint_eq_right_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Midpoint.lean | 184 | 185 | theorem right_eq_midpoint_iff {x y : P} : y = midpoint R x y ↔ x = y := by |
rw [eq_comm, midpoint_eq_right_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.inverse_deriv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# derivatives of the inverse trigonometric functions
Derivatives of `arcsin` and `arccos`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Topology Filter
open Set Filter
open scoped Real
namespace Real
section Arcsin
theorem deriv_arcsin_aux {x : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≠ -1) (h₂ : x ≠ 1) :
HasStrictDerivAt arcsin (1 / √(1 - x ^ 2)) x ∧ ContDiffAt ℝ ⊤ arcsin x := by
cases' h₁.lt_or_lt with h₁ h₁
· have : 1 - x ^ 2 < 0 := by nlinarith [h₁]
rw [sqrt_eq_zero'.2 this.le, div_zero]
have : arcsin =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun _ => -(π / 2) :=
(gt_mem_nhds h₁).mono fun y hy => arcsin_of_le_neg_one hy.le
exact ⟨(hasStrictDerivAt_const _ _).congr_of_eventuallyEq this.symm,
contDiffAt_const.congr_of_eventuallyEq this⟩
cases' h₂.lt_or_lt with h₂ h₂
· have : 0 < √(1 - x ^ 2) := sqrt_pos.2 (by nlinarith [h₁, h₂])
simp only [← cos_arcsin, one_div] at this ⊢
exact ⟨sinPartialHomeomorph.hasStrictDerivAt_symm ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ this.ne' (hasStrictDerivAt_sin _),
sinPartialHomeomorph.contDiffAt_symm_deriv this.ne' ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ (hasDerivAt_sin _)
contDiff_sin.contDiffAt⟩
· have : 1 - x ^ 2 < 0 := by nlinarith [h₂]
rw [sqrt_eq_zero'.2 this.le, div_zero]
have : arcsin =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun _ => π / 2 := (lt_mem_nhds h₂).mono fun y hy => arcsin_of_one_le hy.le
exact ⟨(hasStrictDerivAt_const _ _).congr_of_eventuallyEq this.symm,
contDiffAt_const.congr_of_eventuallyEq this⟩
#align real.deriv_arcsin_aux Real.deriv_arcsin_aux
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≠ -1) (h₂ : x ≠ 1) :
HasStrictDerivAt arcsin (1 / √(1 - x ^ 2)) x :=
(deriv_arcsin_aux h₁ h₂).1
#align real.has_strict_deriv_at_arcsin Real.hasStrictDerivAt_arcsin
theorem hasDerivAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≠ -1) (h₂ : x ≠ 1) :
HasDerivAt arcsin (1 / √(1 - x ^ 2)) x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_arcsin h₁ h₂).hasDerivAt
#align real.has_deriv_at_arcsin Real.hasDerivAt_arcsin
theorem contDiffAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≠ -1) (h₂ : x ≠ 1) {n : ℕ∞} : ContDiffAt ℝ n arcsin x :=
(deriv_arcsin_aux h₁ h₂).2.of_le le_top
#align real.cont_diff_at_arcsin Real.contDiffAt_arcsin
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_arcsin_Ici {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ -1) :
HasDerivWithinAt arcsin (1 / √(1 - x ^ 2)) (Ici x) x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 1 with (rfl | h')
· convert (hasDerivWithinAt_const (1 : ℝ) _ (π / 2)).congr _ _ <;>
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [arcsin_of_one_le]
· exact (hasDerivAt_arcsin h h').hasDerivWithinAt
#align real.has_deriv_within_at_arcsin_Ici Real.hasDerivWithinAt_arcsin_Ici
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/InverseDeriv.lean | 74 | 79 | theorem hasDerivWithinAt_arcsin_Iic {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 1) :
HasDerivWithinAt arcsin (1 / √(1 - x ^ 2)) (Iic x) x := by |
rcases em (x = -1) with (rfl | h')
· convert (hasDerivWithinAt_const (-1 : ℝ) _ (-(π / 2))).congr _ _ <;>
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [arcsin_of_le_neg_one]
· exact (hasDerivAt_arcsin h' h).hasDerivWithinAt
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudriashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudriashov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Closure
#align_import analysis.convex.hull from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92bd7b1ffeb306a89f450bee126ddd8a284c259d"
/-!
# Convex hull
This file defines the convex hull of a set `s` in a module. `convexHull 𝕜 s` is the smallest convex
set containing `s`. In order theory speak, this is a closure operator.
## Implementation notes
`convexHull` is defined as a closure operator. This gives access to the `ClosureOperator` API
while the impact on writing code is minimal as `convexHull 𝕜 s` is automatically elaborated as
`(convexHull 𝕜) s`.
-/
open Set
open Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*}
section convexHull
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable (𝕜)
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F]
/-- The convex hull of a set `s` is the minimal convex set that includes `s`. -/
@[simps! isClosed]
def convexHull : ClosureOperator (Set E) := .ofCompletePred (Convex 𝕜) fun _ ↦ convex_sInter
#align convex_hull convexHull
variable (s : Set E)
theorem subset_convexHull : s ⊆ convexHull 𝕜 s :=
(convexHull 𝕜).le_closure s
#align subset_convex_hull subset_convexHull
theorem convex_convexHull : Convex 𝕜 (convexHull 𝕜 s) := (convexHull 𝕜).isClosed_closure s
#align convex_convex_hull convex_convexHull
theorem convexHull_eq_iInter : convexHull 𝕜 s = ⋂ (t : Set E) (_ : s ⊆ t) (_ : Convex 𝕜 t), t := by
simp [convexHull, iInter_subtype, iInter_and]
#align convex_hull_eq_Inter convexHull_eq_iInter
variable {𝕜 s} {t : Set E} {x y : E}
theorem mem_convexHull_iff : x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ t, s ⊆ t → Convex 𝕜 t → x ∈ t := by
simp_rw [convexHull_eq_iInter, mem_iInter]
#align mem_convex_hull_iff mem_convexHull_iff
theorem convexHull_min : s ⊆ t → Convex 𝕜 t → convexHull 𝕜 s ⊆ t := (convexHull 𝕜).closure_min
#align convex_hull_min convexHull_min
theorem Convex.convexHull_subset_iff (ht : Convex 𝕜 t) : convexHull 𝕜 s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
(show (convexHull 𝕜).IsClosed t from ht).closure_le_iff
#align convex.convex_hull_subset_iff Convex.convexHull_subset_iff
@[mono]
theorem convexHull_mono (hst : s ⊆ t) : convexHull 𝕜 s ⊆ convexHull 𝕜 t :=
(convexHull 𝕜).monotone hst
#align convex_hull_mono convexHull_mono
lemma convexHull_eq_self : convexHull 𝕜 s = s ↔ Convex 𝕜 s := (convexHull 𝕜).isClosed_iff.symm
alias ⟨_, Convex.convexHull_eq⟩ := convexHull_eq_self
#align convex.convex_hull_eq Convex.convexHull_eq
@[simp]
theorem convexHull_univ : convexHull 𝕜 (univ : Set E) = univ :=
ClosureOperator.closure_top (convexHull 𝕜)
#align convex_hull_univ convexHull_univ
@[simp]
theorem convexHull_empty : convexHull 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) = ∅ :=
convex_empty.convexHull_eq
#align convex_hull_empty convexHull_empty
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Hull.lean | 94 | 100 | theorem convexHull_empty_iff : convexHull 𝕜 s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by |
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Set.subset_empty_iff, ← h]
exact subset_convexHull 𝕜 _
· rintro rfl
exact convexHull_empty
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Topology.DenseEmbedding
#align_import topology.stone_cech from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0a0ec35061ed9960bf0e7ffb0335f44447b58977"
/-! # Stone-Čech compactification
Construction of the Stone-Čech compactification using ultrafilters.
Parts of the formalization are based on "Ultrafilters and Topology"
by Marius Stekelenburg, particularly section 5.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Set
open Topology
universe u v
section Ultrafilter
/- The set of ultrafilters on α carries a natural topology which makes
it the Stone-Čech compactification of α (viewed as a discrete space). -/
/-- Basis for the topology on `Ultrafilter α`. -/
def ultrafilterBasis (α : Type u) : Set (Set (Ultrafilter α)) :=
range fun s : Set α => { u | s ∈ u }
#align ultrafilter_basis ultrafilterBasis
variable {α : Type u}
instance Ultrafilter.topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (Ultrafilter α) :=
TopologicalSpace.generateFrom (ultrafilterBasis α)
#align ultrafilter.topological_space Ultrafilter.topologicalSpace
theorem ultrafilterBasis_is_basis : TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis (ultrafilterBasis α) :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, rfl⟩ u ⟨ua, ub⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨a ∩ b, rfl⟩, inter_mem ua ub, fun v hv => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩ <;> apply mem_of_superset hv <;>
simp [inter_subset_right],
eq_univ_of_univ_subset <| subset_sUnion_of_mem <| ⟨univ, eq_univ_of_forall fun u => univ_mem⟩,
rfl⟩
#align ultrafilter_basis_is_basis ultrafilterBasis_is_basis
/-- The basic open sets for the topology on ultrafilters are open. -/
theorem ultrafilter_isOpen_basic (s : Set α) : IsOpen { u : Ultrafilter α | s ∈ u } :=
ultrafilterBasis_is_basis.isOpen ⟨s, rfl⟩
#align ultrafilter_is_open_basic ultrafilter_isOpen_basic
/-- The basic open sets for the topology on ultrafilters are also closed. -/
theorem ultrafilter_isClosed_basic (s : Set α) : IsClosed { u : Ultrafilter α | s ∈ u } := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff]
convert ultrafilter_isOpen_basic sᶜ using 1
ext u
exact Ultrafilter.compl_mem_iff_not_mem.symm
#align ultrafilter_is_closed_basic ultrafilter_isClosed_basic
/-- Every ultrafilter `u` on `Ultrafilter α` converges to a unique
point of `Ultrafilter α`, namely `joinM u`. -/
theorem ultrafilter_converges_iff {u : Ultrafilter (Ultrafilter α)} {x : Ultrafilter α} :
↑u ≤ 𝓝 x ↔ x = joinM u := by
rw [eq_comm, ← Ultrafilter.coe_le_coe]
change ↑u ≤ 𝓝 x ↔ ∀ s ∈ x, { v : Ultrafilter α | s ∈ v } ∈ u
simp only [TopologicalSpace.nhds_generateFrom, le_iInf_iff, ultrafilterBasis, le_principal_iff,
mem_setOf_eq]
constructor
· intro h a ha
exact h _ ⟨ha, a, rfl⟩
· rintro h a ⟨xi, a, rfl⟩
exact h _ xi
#align ultrafilter_converges_iff ultrafilter_converges_iff
instance ultrafilter_compact : CompactSpace (Ultrafilter α) :=
⟨isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds.mpr fun f _ =>
⟨joinM f, trivial, ultrafilter_converges_iff.mpr rfl⟩⟩
#align ultrafilter_compact ultrafilter_compact
instance Ultrafilter.t2Space : T2Space (Ultrafilter α) :=
t2_iff_ultrafilter.mpr @fun x y f fx fy =>
have hx : x = joinM f := ultrafilter_converges_iff.mp fx
have hy : y = joinM f := ultrafilter_converges_iff.mp fy
hx.trans hy.symm
#align ultrafilter.t2_space Ultrafilter.t2Space
instance : TotallyDisconnectedSpace (Ultrafilter α) := by
rw [totallyDisconnectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent_singleton]
intro A
simp only [Set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, mem_connectedComponent, true_and_iff]
intro B hB
rw [← Ultrafilter.coe_le_coe]
intro s hs
rw [connectedComponent_eq_iInter_isClopen, Set.mem_iInter] at hB
let Z := { F : Ultrafilter α | s ∈ F }
have hZ : IsClopen Z := ⟨ultrafilter_isClosed_basic s, ultrafilter_isOpen_basic s⟩
exact hB ⟨Z, hZ, hs⟩
@[simp] theorem Ultrafilter.tendsto_pure_self (b : Ultrafilter α) : Tendsto pure b (𝓝 b) := by
rw [Tendsto, ← coe_map, ultrafilter_converges_iff]
ext s
change s ∈ b ↔ {t | s ∈ t} ∈ map pure b
simp_rw [mem_map, preimage_setOf_eq, mem_pure, setOf_mem_eq]
theorem ultrafilter_comap_pure_nhds (b : Ultrafilter α) : comap pure (𝓝 b) ≤ b := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.nhds_generateFrom]
simp only [comap_iInf, comap_principal]
intro s hs
rw [← le_principal_iff]
refine iInf_le_of_le { u | s ∈ u } ?_
refine iInf_le_of_le ⟨hs, ⟨s, rfl⟩⟩ ?_
exact principal_mono.2 fun a => id
#align ultrafilter_comap_pure_nhds ultrafilter_comap_pure_nhds
section Embedding
theorem ultrafilter_pure_injective : Function.Injective (pure : α → Ultrafilter α) := by
intro x y h
have : {x} ∈ (pure x : Ultrafilter α) := singleton_mem_pure
rw [h] at this
exact (mem_singleton_iff.mp (mem_pure.mp this)).symm
#align ultrafilter_pure_injective ultrafilter_pure_injective
open TopologicalSpace
/-- The range of `pure : α → Ultrafilter α` is dense in `Ultrafilter α`. -/
theorem denseRange_pure : DenseRange (pure : α → Ultrafilter α) := fun x =>
mem_closure_iff_ultrafilter.mpr
⟨x.map pure, range_mem_map, ultrafilter_converges_iff.mpr (bind_pure x).symm⟩
#align dense_range_pure denseRange_pure
/-- The map `pure : α → Ultrafilter α` induces on `α` the discrete topology. -/
theorem induced_topology_pure :
TopologicalSpace.induced (pure : α → Ultrafilter α) Ultrafilter.topologicalSpace = ⊥ := by
apply eq_bot_of_singletons_open
intro x
use { u : Ultrafilter α | {x} ∈ u }, ultrafilter_isOpen_basic _
simp
#align induced_topology_pure induced_topology_pure
/-- `pure : α → Ultrafilter α` defines a dense inducing of `α` in `Ultrafilter α`. -/
theorem denseInducing_pure : @DenseInducing _ _ ⊥ _ (pure : α → Ultrafilter α) :=
letI : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥
⟨⟨induced_topology_pure.symm⟩, denseRange_pure⟩
#align dense_inducing_pure denseInducing_pure
-- The following refined version will never be used
/-- `pure : α → Ultrafilter α` defines a dense embedding of `α` in `Ultrafilter α`. -/
theorem denseEmbedding_pure : @DenseEmbedding _ _ ⊥ _ (pure : α → Ultrafilter α) :=
letI : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥
{ denseInducing_pure with inj := ultrafilter_pure_injective }
#align dense_embedding_pure denseEmbedding_pure
end Embedding
section Extension
/- Goal: Any function `α → γ` to a compact Hausdorff space `γ` has a
unique extension to a continuous function `Ultrafilter α → γ`. We
already know it must be unique because `α → Ultrafilter α` is a
dense embedding and `γ` is Hausdorff. For existence, we will invoke
`DenseInducing.continuous_extend`. -/
variable {γ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace γ]
/-- The extension of a function `α → γ` to a function `Ultrafilter α → γ`.
When `γ` is a compact Hausdorff space it will be continuous. -/
def Ultrafilter.extend (f : α → γ) : Ultrafilter α → γ :=
letI : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥
denseInducing_pure.extend f
#align ultrafilter.extend Ultrafilter.extend
variable [T2Space γ]
theorem ultrafilter_extend_extends (f : α → γ) : Ultrafilter.extend f ∘ pure = f := by
letI : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥
haveI : DiscreteTopology α := ⟨rfl⟩
exact funext (denseInducing_pure.extend_eq continuous_of_discreteTopology)
#align ultrafilter_extend_extends ultrafilter_extend_extends
variable [CompactSpace γ]
theorem continuous_ultrafilter_extend (f : α → γ) : Continuous (Ultrafilter.extend f) := by
have h : ∀ b : Ultrafilter α, ∃ c, Tendsto f (comap pure (𝓝 b)) (𝓝 c) := fun b =>
-- b.map f is an ultrafilter on γ, which is compact, so it converges to some c in γ.
let ⟨c, _, h'⟩ :=
isCompact_univ.ultrafilter_le_nhds (b.map f) (by rw [le_principal_iff]; exact univ_mem)
⟨c, le_trans (map_mono (ultrafilter_comap_pure_nhds _)) h'⟩
letI : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥
exact denseInducing_pure.continuous_extend h
#align continuous_ultrafilter_extend continuous_ultrafilter_extend
/-- The value of `Ultrafilter.extend f` on an ultrafilter `b` is the
unique limit of the ultrafilter `b.map f` in `γ`. -/
theorem ultrafilter_extend_eq_iff {f : α → γ} {b : Ultrafilter α} {c : γ} :
Ultrafilter.extend f b = c ↔ ↑(b.map f) ≤ 𝓝 c :=
⟨fun h => by
-- Write b as an ultrafilter limit of pure ultrafilters, and use
-- the facts that ultrafilter.extend is a continuous extension of f.
let b' : Ultrafilter (Ultrafilter α) := b.map pure
have t : ↑b' ≤ 𝓝 b := ultrafilter_converges_iff.mpr (bind_pure _).symm
rw [← h]
have := (continuous_ultrafilter_extend f).tendsto b
refine le_trans ?_ (le_trans (map_mono t) this)
change _ ≤ map (Ultrafilter.extend f ∘ pure) ↑b
rw [ultrafilter_extend_extends]
exact le_rfl, fun h =>
letI : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥
denseInducing_pure.extend_eq_of_tendsto
(le_trans (map_mono (ultrafilter_comap_pure_nhds _)) h)⟩
#align ultrafilter_extend_eq_iff ultrafilter_extend_eq_iff
end Extension
end Ultrafilter
section StoneCech
/- Now, we start with a (not necessarily discrete) topological space α
and we want to construct its Stone-Čech compactification. We can
build it as a quotient of `Ultrafilter α` by the relation which
identifies two points if the extension of every continuous function
α → γ to a compact Hausdorff space sends the two points to the same
point of γ. -/
variable (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α]
instance stoneCechSetoid : Setoid (Ultrafilter α) where
r x y :=
∀ (γ : Type u) [TopologicalSpace γ],
∀ [T2Space γ] [CompactSpace γ] (f : α → γ) (_ : Continuous f),
Ultrafilter.extend f x = Ultrafilter.extend f y
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => rfl, @fun _ _ xy γ _ _ _ f hf => (xy γ f hf).symm,
@fun _ _ _ xy yz γ _ _ _ f hf => (xy γ f hf).trans (yz γ f hf)⟩
#align stone_cech_setoid stoneCechSetoid
/-- The Stone-Čech compactification of a topological space. -/
def StoneCech : Type u :=
Quotient (stoneCechSetoid α)
#align stone_cech StoneCech
variable {α}
instance : TopologicalSpace (StoneCech α) := by unfold StoneCech; infer_instance
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (StoneCech α) := by unfold StoneCech; infer_instance
/-- The natural map from α to its Stone-Čech compactification. -/
def stoneCechUnit (x : α) : StoneCech α :=
⟦pure x⟧
#align stone_cech_unit stoneCechUnit
/-- The image of stone_cech_unit is dense. (But stone_cech_unit need
not be an embedding, for example if α is not Hausdorff.) -/
theorem denseRange_stoneCechUnit : DenseRange (stoneCechUnit : α → StoneCech α) :=
denseRange_pure.quotient
#align dense_range_stone_cech_unit denseRange_stoneCechUnit
section Extension
variable {γ : Type u} [TopologicalSpace γ] [T2Space γ] [CompactSpace γ]
variable {γ' : Type u} [TopologicalSpace γ'] [T2Space γ']
variable {f : α → γ} (hf : Continuous f)
-- Porting note: missing attribute
--attribute [local elab_with_expected_type] Quotient.lift
/-- The extension of a continuous function from α to a compact
Hausdorff space γ to the Stone-Čech compactification of α. -/
def stoneCechExtend : StoneCech α → γ :=
Quotient.lift (Ultrafilter.extend f) fun _ _ xy => xy γ f hf
#align stone_cech_extend stoneCechExtend
theorem stoneCechExtend_extends : stoneCechExtend hf ∘ stoneCechUnit = f :=
ultrafilter_extend_extends f
#align stone_cech_extend_extends stoneCechExtend_extends
theorem continuous_stoneCechExtend : Continuous (stoneCechExtend hf) :=
continuous_quot_lift _ (continuous_ultrafilter_extend f)
#align continuous_stone_cech_extend continuous_stoneCechExtend
| Mathlib/Topology/StoneCech.lean | 286 | 290 | theorem stoneCech_hom_ext {g₁ g₂ : StoneCech α → γ'} (h₁ : Continuous g₁) (h₂ : Continuous g₂)
(h : g₁ ∘ stoneCechUnit = g₂ ∘ stoneCechUnit) : g₁ = g₂ := by |
apply Continuous.ext_on denseRange_stoneCechUnit h₁ h₂
rintro x ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply congr_fun h x
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.MulAction
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Lipschitz
#align_import topology.metric_space.algebra from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"14d34b71b6d896b6e5f1ba2ec9124b9cd1f90fca"
/-!
# Compatibility of algebraic operations with metric space structures
In this file we define mixin typeclasses `LipschitzMul`, `LipschitzAdd`,
`BoundedSMul` expressing compatibility of multiplication, addition and scalar-multiplication
operations with an underlying metric space structure. The intended use case is to abstract certain
properties shared by normed groups and by `R≥0`.
## Implementation notes
We deduce a `ContinuousMul` instance from `LipschitzMul`, etc. In principle there should
be an intermediate typeclass for uniform spaces, but the algebraic hierarchy there (see
`UniformGroup`) is structured differently.
-/
open NNReal
noncomputable section
variable (α β : Type*) [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β]
section LipschitzMul
/-- Class `LipschitzAdd M` says that the addition `(+) : X × X → X` is Lipschitz jointly in
the two arguments. -/
class LipschitzAdd [AddMonoid β] : Prop where
lipschitz_add : ∃ C, LipschitzWith C fun p : β × β => p.1 + p.2
#align has_lipschitz_add LipschitzAdd
/-- Class `LipschitzMul M` says that the multiplication `(*) : X × X → X` is Lipschitz jointly
in the two arguments. -/
@[to_additive]
class LipschitzMul [Monoid β] : Prop where
lipschitz_mul : ∃ C, LipschitzWith C fun p : β × β => p.1 * p.2
#align has_lipschitz_mul LipschitzMul
/-- The Lipschitz constant of an `AddMonoid` `β` satisfying `LipschitzAdd` -/
def LipschitzAdd.C [AddMonoid β] [_i : LipschitzAdd β] : ℝ≥0 := Classical.choose _i.lipschitz_add
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align has_lipschitz_add.C LipschitzAdd.C
variable [Monoid β]
/-- The Lipschitz constant of a monoid `β` satisfying `LipschitzMul` -/
@[to_additive existing] -- Porting note: had to add `LipschitzAdd.C`. to_additive silently failed
def LipschitzMul.C [_i : LipschitzMul β] : ℝ≥0 := Classical.choose _i.lipschitz_mul
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align has_lipschitz_mul.C LipschitzMul.C
variable {β}
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzWith_lipschitz_const_mul_edist [_i : LipschitzMul β] :
LipschitzWith (LipschitzMul.C β) fun p : β × β => p.1 * p.2 :=
Classical.choose_spec _i.lipschitz_mul
#align lipschitz_with_lipschitz_const_mul_edist lipschitzWith_lipschitz_const_mul_edist
#align lipschitz_with_lipschitz_const_add_edist lipschitzWith_lipschitz_const_add_edist
variable [LipschitzMul β]
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Algebra.lean | 75 | 78 | theorem lipschitz_with_lipschitz_const_mul :
∀ p q : β × β, dist (p.1 * p.2) (q.1 * q.2) ≤ LipschitzMul.C β * dist p q := by |
rw [← lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul]
exact lipschitzWith_lipschitz_const_mul_edist
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Discriminant
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Eisenstein.IsIntegral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Norm
#align_import number_theory.cyclotomic.rat from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b353176c24d96c23f0ce1cc63efc3f55019702d9"
/-!
# Ring of integers of `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic fields
We gather results about cyclotomic extensions of `ℚ`. In particular, we compute the ring of
integers of a `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow`: if `K` is a
`p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the integral closure of
`ℤ` in `K`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow`: the integral
closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is `CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.absdiscr_prime_pow` and related results: the absolute discriminant
of cyclotomic fields.
-/
universe u
open Algebra IsCyclotomicExtension Polynomial NumberField
open scoped Cyclotomic Nat
variable {p : ℕ+} {k : ℕ} {K : Type u} [Field K] [CharZero K] {ζ : K} [hp : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime]
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_ne_two' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hk : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ (k + 1) : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ k * ((p - 1) * (k + 1) - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow_ne_two hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ (k + 1)).pos) hk]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.discr_prime_pow_ne_two' IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow_ne_two'
theorem discr_odd_prime' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = (-1) ^ (((p : ℕ) - 1) / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) - 2) := by
rw [← discr_odd_prime hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat hp.out.pos) hodd]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.discr_odd_prime' IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_odd_prime'
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. Beware that in the cases `p ^ k = 1` and
`p ^ k = 2` the formula uses `1 / 2 = 0` and `0 - 1 = 0`. It is useful only to have a uniform
result. See also `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ k : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ (k - 1) * ((p - 1) * k - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.discr_prime_pow' IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow'
/-- If `p` is a prime and `IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} K L`, then there are `u : ℤˣ` and
`n : ℕ` such that the discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1` is `u * p ^ n`. Often this is
enough and less cumbersome to use than `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
∃ (u : ℤˣ) (n : ℕ), discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = u * p ^ n := by
rw [hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm]
exact discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow'
/-- If `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the
integral closure of `ℤ` in `K`. -/
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
refine ⟨Subtype.val_injective, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
swap
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact
IsIntegral.algebraMap
((le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral.1
(adjoin_le_integralClosure (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos))).isIntegral _)
let B := hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ
have hint : IsIntegral ℤ B.gen := (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos).sub isIntegral_one
-- Porting note: the following `haveI` was not needed because the locale `cyclotomic` set it
-- as instances.
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.finiteDimensional {p ^ k} ℚ K
have H := discr_mul_isIntegral_mem_adjoin ℚ hint h
obtain ⟨u, n, hun⟩ := discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' hζ
rw [hun] at H
replace H := Subalgebra.smul_mem _ H u.inv
-- Porting note: the proof is slightly different because of coercions.
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_mul_assoc, Units.inv_eq_val_inv, zsmul_eq_mul, ← Int.cast_mul,
Units.inv_mul, Int.cast_one, one_mul, smul_def, map_pow] at H
cases k
· haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
have : x ∈ (⊥ : Subalgebra ℚ K) := by
rw [singleton_one ℚ K]
exact mem_top
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := mem_bot.1 this
replace h := (isIntegral_algebraMap_iff (algebraMap ℚ K).injective).1 h
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := IsIntegrallyClosed.isIntegral_iff.1 h
rw [← hz, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
exact Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ _
· have hmin : (minpoly ℤ B.gen).IsEisensteinAt (Submodule.span ℤ {((p : ℕ) : ℤ)}) := by
have h₁ := minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hint
have h₂ := hζ.minpoly_sub_one_eq_cyclotomic_comp (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ _).pos)
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen] at h₁
rw [h₁, ← map_cyclotomic_int, show Int.castRingHom ℚ = algebraMap ℤ ℚ by rfl,
show X + 1 = map (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (X + 1) by simp, ← map_comp] at h₂
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen,
map_injective (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (algebraMap ℤ ℚ).injective_int h₂]
exact cyclotomic_prime_pow_comp_X_add_one_isEisensteinAt p _
refine
adjoin_le ?_
(mem_adjoin_of_smul_prime_pow_smul_of_minpoly_isEisensteinAt (n := n)
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out) hint h (by simpa using H) hmin)
simp only [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ _) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.is_integral_closure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
rw [← pow_one p] at hζ hcycl
exact isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.is_integral_closure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime
/-- The integral closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is
`CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`. -/
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ) := by
have hζ := zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ)
refine ⟨IsFractionRing.injective _ _, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
-- Porting note: having `.isIntegral_iff` inside the definition of `this` causes an error.
· have := isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := this.isIntegral_iff.1 h
refine adjoin_mono ?_ y.2
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact hζ.pow_eq_one
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact IsIntegral.algebraMap ((IsCyclotomicExtension.integral {p ^ k} ℤ _).isIntegral _)
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.cyclotomic_ring_is_integral_closure_of_prime_pow IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing p ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField p ℚ) := by
rw [← pow_one p]
exact cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.cyclotomic_ring_is_integral_closure_of_prime IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime
end IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
section PowerBasis
open IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
namespace IsPrimitiveRoot
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ k`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
[IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
let _ := isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
IsIntegralClosure.equiv ℤ (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) K (𝓞 K)
#align is_primitive_root.adjoin_equiv_ring_of_integers IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- The ring of integers of a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance IsCyclotomicExtension.ringOfIntegers [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.ring_of_integers IsPrimitiveRoot.IsCyclotomicExtension.ringOfIntegers
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p ^ k`
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
(Algebra.adjoin.powerBasis' (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos)).map hζ.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
#align is_primitive_root.integral_power_basis IsPrimitiveRoot.integralPowerBasis
/-- Abbreviation to see a primitive root of unity as a member of the ring of integers. -/
abbrev toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : 𝓞 K := ⟨ζ, hζ.isIntegral k.pos⟩
lemma toInteger_isPrimitiveRoot {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
IsPrimitiveRoot hζ.toInteger k :=
IsPrimitiveRoot.of_map_of_injective (by exact hζ) RingOfIntegers.coe_injective
-- Porting note: the proof changed because `simp` unfolds too much.
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = hζ.toInteger :=
Subtype.ext <| show algebraMap _ K hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = _ by
rw [integralPowerBasis, PowerBasis.map_gen, adjoin.powerBasis'_gen]
simp only [adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers_apply, IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_lift]
rfl
#align is_primitive_root.integral_power_basis_gen IsPrimitiveRoot.integralPowerBasis_gen
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_dim [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : hζ.integralPowerBasis.dim = φ (p ^ k) := by
simp [integralPowerBasis, ← cyclotomic_eq_minpoly hζ, natDegree_cyclotomic]
#align is_primitive_root.integral_power_basis_dim IsPrimitiveRoot.integralPowerBasis_dim
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers'
[hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
@adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers p 1 K _ _ _ _ (by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one])
#align is_primitive_root.adjoin_equiv_ring_of_integers' IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers'
/-- The ring of integers of a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance _root_.IsCyclotomicExtension.ring_of_integers' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec p ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec p ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers'
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.ring_of_integers' IsCyclotomicExtension.ring_of_integers'
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p`-th
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis' [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
@integralPowerBasis p 1 K _ _ _ _ (by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one])
#align is_primitive_root.integral_power_basis' IsPrimitiveRoot.integralPowerBasis'
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis'_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis'.gen = hζ.toInteger :=
@integralPowerBasis_gen p 1 K _ _ _ _ (by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one])
#align is_primitive_root.integral_power_basis'_gen IsPrimitiveRoot.integralPowerBasis'_gen
@[simp]
theorem power_basis_int'_dim [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis'.dim = φ p := by
erw [@integralPowerBasis_dim p 1 K _ _ _ _ (by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one]),
pow_one]
#align is_primitive_root.power_basis_int'_dim IsPrimitiveRoot.power_basis_int'_dim
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by `ζ - 1`, where `K` is a `p ^ k` cyclotomic
extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def subOneIntegralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
PowerBasis.ofGenMemAdjoin' hζ.integralPowerBasis (RingOfIntegers.isIntegral _)
(by
simp only [integralPowerBasis_gen, toInteger]
convert Subalgebra.add_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ (⟨ζ - 1, _⟩ : 𝓞 K))
(Subalgebra.one_mem _)
-- Porting note: `simp` was able to finish the proof.
· simp only [Subsemiring.coe_add, Subalgebra.coe_toSubsemiring,
OneMemClass.coe_one, sub_add_cancel]
· exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (hζ.isIntegral (by simp)) (Subalgebra.one_mem _))
#align is_primitive_root.sub_one_integral_power_basis IsPrimitiveRoot.subOneIntegralPowerBasis
@[simp]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis.gen =
⟨ζ - 1, Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)⟩ := by
simp [subOneIntegralPowerBasis]
#align is_primitive_root.sub_one_integral_power_basis_gen IsPrimitiveRoot.subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by `ζ - 1`, where `K` is a `p`-th cyclotomic
extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def subOneIntegralPowerBasis' [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
@subOneIntegralPowerBasis p 1 K _ _ _ _ (by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one])
#align is_primitive_root.sub_one_integral_power_basis' IsPrimitiveRoot.subOneIntegralPowerBasis'
@[simp]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis'.gen = hζ.toInteger - 1 :=
@subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen p 1 K _ _ _ _ (by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one])
#align is_primitive_root.sub_one_integral_power_basis'_gen IsPrimitiveRoot.subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `p ≠ 2` and `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity.
See `zeta_sub_one_prime` for a general statement. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime_of_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
refine Ideal.prime_of_irreducible_absNorm_span (fun h ↦ ?_) ?_
· apply hζ.pow_ne_one_of_pos_of_lt zero_lt_one (one_lt_pow hp.out.one_lt (by simp))
rw [sub_eq_zero] at h
simpa using congrArg (algebraMap _ K) h
rw [Nat.irreducible_iff_prime, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton, ← Nat.prime_iff,
← Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime]
convert Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_natCast]
exact hζ.norm_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two (Polynomial.cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (PNat.pos _)) hodd
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `2 ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity.
See `zeta_sub_one_prime` for a general statement. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime_of_two_pow [IsCyclotomicExtension {(2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑((2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1))) :
Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {(2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
refine Ideal.prime_of_irreducible_absNorm_span (fun h ↦ ?_) ?_
· apply hζ.pow_ne_one_of_pos_of_lt zero_lt_one (one_lt_pow (by decide) (by simp))
rw [sub_eq_zero] at h
simpa using congrArg (algebraMap _ K) h
rw [Nat.irreducible_iff_prime, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton, ← Nat.prime_iff,
← Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime]
cases k
· convert Prime.neg Int.prime_two
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [Nat.zero_eq, PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_neg, map_ofNat]
simpa only [zero_add, pow_one, AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub, OneMemClass.coe_one, Nat.zero_eq,
pow_zero]
using hζ.norm_pow_sub_one_two (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat
(by simp only [Nat.zero_eq, zero_add, pow_one, Nat.ofNat_pos]))
convert Int.prime_two
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_natCast]
exact hζ.norm_sub_one_two Nat.AtLeastTwo.prop (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (by simp))
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) : Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
by_cases htwo : p = 2
· subst htwo
apply hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime_of_two_pow
· apply hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime_of_ne_two htwo
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `p`-th root of unity. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime' [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
Prime ((hζ.toInteger - 1)) := by
convert zeta_sub_one_prime (k := 0) (by simpa only [zero_add, pow_one])
simpa only [zero_add, pow_one]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Rat.lean | 341 | 344 | theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) :
Prime hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis.gen := by |
simpa only [subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen] using hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pi.Bounds
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.CanonicalEmbedding.ConvexBody
/-!
# Number field discriminant
This file defines the discriminant of a number field.
## Main definitions
* `NumberField.discr`: the absolute discriminant of a number field.
## Main result
* `NumberField.abs_discr_gt_two`: **Hermite-Minkowski Theorem**. A nontrivial number field has
discriminant greater than `2`.
* `NumberField.finite_of_discr_bdd`: **Hermite Theorem**. Let `N` be an integer. There are only
finitely many number fields (in some fixed extension of `ℚ`) of discriminant bounded by `N`.
## Tags
number field, discriminant
-/
-- TODO. Rewrite some of the FLT results on the disciminant using the definitions and results of
-- this file
namespace NumberField
open FiniteDimensional NumberField NumberField.InfinitePlace Matrix
open scoped Classical Real nonZeroDivisors
variable (K : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K]
/-- The absolute discriminant of a number field. -/
noncomputable abbrev discr : ℤ := Algebra.discr ℤ (RingOfIntegers.basis K)
theorem coe_discr : (discr K : ℚ) = Algebra.discr ℚ (integralBasis K) :=
(Algebra.discr_localizationLocalization ℤ _ K (RingOfIntegers.basis K)).symm
theorem discr_ne_zero : discr K ≠ 0 := by
rw [← (Int.cast_injective (α := ℚ)).ne_iff, coe_discr]
exact Algebra.discr_not_zero_of_basis ℚ (integralBasis K)
theorem discr_eq_discr {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (b : Basis ι ℤ (𝓞 K)) :
Algebra.discr ℤ b = discr K := by
let b₀ := Basis.reindex (RingOfIntegers.basis K) (Basis.indexEquiv (RingOfIntegers.basis K) b)
rw [Algebra.discr_eq_discr (𝓞 K) b b₀, Basis.coe_reindex, Algebra.discr_reindex]
theorem discr_eq_discr_of_algEquiv {L : Type*} [Field L] [NumberField L] (f : K ≃ₐ[ℚ] L) :
discr K = discr L := by
let f₀ : 𝓞 K ≃ₗ[ℤ] 𝓞 L := (f.restrictScalars ℤ).mapIntegralClosure.toLinearEquiv
rw [← Rat.intCast_inj, coe_discr, Algebra.discr_eq_discr_of_algEquiv (integralBasis K) f,
← discr_eq_discr L ((RingOfIntegers.basis K).map f₀)]
change _ = algebraMap ℤ ℚ _
rw [← Algebra.discr_localizationLocalization ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ) L]
congr
ext
simp only [Function.comp_apply, integralBasis_apply, Basis.localizationLocalization_apply,
Basis.map_apply]
rfl
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Zspan NumberField.mixedEmbedding
NumberField.InfinitePlace ENNReal NNReal Complex
theorem _root_.NumberField.mixedEmbedding.volume_fundamentalDomain_latticeBasis :
volume (fundamentalDomain (latticeBasis K)) =
(2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ^ NrComplexPlaces K * sqrt ‖discr K‖₊ := by
let f : Module.Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K) ≃ (K →+* ℂ) :=
(canonicalEmbedding.latticeBasis K).indexEquiv (Pi.basisFun ℂ _)
let e : (index K) ≃ Module.Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K) := (indexEquiv K).trans f.symm
let M := (mixedEmbedding.stdBasis K).toMatrix ((latticeBasis K).reindex e.symm)
let N := Algebra.embeddingsMatrixReindex ℚ ℂ (integralBasis K ∘ f.symm)
RingHom.equivRatAlgHom
suffices M.map Complex.ofReal = (matrixToStdBasis K) *
(Matrix.reindex (indexEquiv K).symm (indexEquiv K).symm N).transpose by
calc volume (fundamentalDomain (latticeBasis K))
_ = ‖((mixedEmbedding.stdBasis K).toMatrix ((latticeBasis K).reindex e.symm)).det‖₊ := by
rw [← fundamentalDomain_reindex _ e.symm, ← norm_toNNReal, measure_fundamentalDomain
((latticeBasis K).reindex e.symm), volume_fundamentalDomain_stdBasis, mul_one]
rfl
_ = ‖(matrixToStdBasis K).det * N.det‖₊ := by
rw [← nnnorm_real, ← ofReal_eq_coe, RingHom.map_det, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, this,
det_mul, det_transpose, det_reindex_self]
_ = (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ^ Fintype.card {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} * sqrt ‖N.det ^ 2‖₊ := by
have : ‖Complex.I‖₊ = 1 := by rw [← norm_toNNReal, norm_eq_abs, abs_I, Real.toNNReal_one]
rw [det_matrixToStdBasis, nnnorm_mul, nnnorm_pow, nnnorm_mul, this, mul_one, nnnorm_inv,
coe_mul, ENNReal.coe_pow, ← norm_toNNReal, RCLike.norm_two, Real.toNNReal_ofNat,
coe_inv two_ne_zero, coe_ofNat, nnnorm_pow, NNReal.sqrt_sq]
_ = (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ^ Fintype.card { w // IsComplex w } * NNReal.sqrt ‖discr K‖₊ := by
rw [← Algebra.discr_eq_det_embeddingsMatrixReindex_pow_two, Algebra.discr_reindex,
← coe_discr, map_intCast, ← Complex.nnnorm_int]
ext : 2
dsimp only [M]
rw [Matrix.map_apply, Basis.toMatrix_apply, Basis.coe_reindex, Function.comp_apply,
Equiv.symm_symm, latticeBasis_apply, ← commMap_canonical_eq_mixed, Complex.ofReal_eq_coe,
stdBasis_repr_eq_matrixToStdBasis_mul K _ (fun _ => rfl)]
rfl
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_of_norm_le_mul_sqrt_discr (I : (FractionalIdeal (𝓞 K)⁰ K)ˣ) :
∃ a ∈ (I : FractionalIdeal (𝓞 K)⁰ K), a ≠ 0 ∧
|Algebra.norm ℚ (a:K)| ≤ FractionalIdeal.absNorm I.1 * (4 / π) ^ NrComplexPlaces K *
(finrank ℚ K).factorial / (finrank ℚ K) ^ (finrank ℚ K) * Real.sqrt |discr K| := by
-- The smallest possible value for `exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_of_norm_le`
let B := (minkowskiBound K I * (convexBodySumFactor K)⁻¹).toReal ^ (1 / (finrank ℚ K : ℝ))
have h_le : (minkowskiBound K I) ≤ volume (convexBodySum K B) := by
refine le_of_eq ?_
rw [convexBodySum_volume, ← ENNReal.ofReal_pow (by positivity), ← Real.rpow_natCast,
← Real.rpow_mul toReal_nonneg, div_mul_cancel₀, Real.rpow_one, ofReal_toReal, mul_comm,
mul_assoc, ← coe_mul, inv_mul_cancel (convexBodySumFactor_ne_zero K), ENNReal.coe_one,
mul_one]
· exact mul_ne_top (ne_of_lt (minkowskiBound_lt_top K I)) coe_ne_top
· exact (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt finrank_pos))
convert exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_of_norm_le K I h_le
rw [div_pow B, ← Real.rpow_natCast B, ← Real.rpow_mul (by positivity), div_mul_cancel₀ _
(Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr <| ne_of_gt finrank_pos), Real.rpow_one, mul_comm_div, mul_div_assoc']
congr 1
rw [eq_comm]
calc
_ = FractionalIdeal.absNorm I.1 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ NrComplexPlaces K * sqrt ‖discr K‖₊ *
(2 : ℝ) ^ finrank ℚ K * ((2 : ℝ) ^ NrRealPlaces K * (π / 2) ^ NrComplexPlaces K /
(Nat.factorial (finrank ℚ K)))⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [minkowskiBound, convexBodySumFactor,
volume_fundamentalDomain_fractionalIdealLatticeBasis,
volume_fundamentalDomain_latticeBasis, toReal_mul, toReal_pow, toReal_inv, coe_toReal,
toReal_ofNat, mixedEmbedding.finrank, mul_assoc]
rw [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (Rat.cast_nonneg.mpr (FractionalIdeal.absNorm_nonneg I.1))]
simp_rw [NNReal.coe_inv, NNReal.coe_div, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_pow, NNReal.coe_div,
coe_real_pi, NNReal.coe_ofNat, NNReal.coe_natCast]
_ = FractionalIdeal.absNorm I.1 * (2 : ℝ) ^ (finrank ℚ K - NrComplexPlaces K - NrRealPlaces K +
NrComplexPlaces K : ℤ) * Real.sqrt ‖discr K‖ * Nat.factorial (finrank ℚ K) *
π⁻¹ ^ (NrComplexPlaces K) := by
simp_rw [inv_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv, ← zpow_neg_one, ← zpow_natCast, mul_zpow,
← zpow_mul, neg_one_mul, mul_neg_one, neg_neg, Real.coe_sqrt, coe_nnnorm, sub_eq_add_neg,
zpow_add₀ (two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0)]
ring
_ = FractionalIdeal.absNorm I.1 * (2 : ℝ) ^ (2 * NrComplexPlaces K : ℤ) * Real.sqrt ‖discr K‖ *
Nat.factorial (finrank ℚ K) * π⁻¹ ^ (NrComplexPlaces K) := by
congr
rw [← card_add_two_mul_card_eq_rank, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_ofNat]
ring
_ = FractionalIdeal.absNorm I.1 * (4 / π) ^ NrComplexPlaces K * (finrank ℚ K).factorial *
Real.sqrt |discr K| := by
rw [Int.norm_eq_abs, zpow_mul, show (2 : ℝ) ^ (2 : ℤ) = 4 by norm_cast, div_pow,
inv_eq_one_div, div_pow, one_pow, zpow_natCast]
ring
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_ringOfIntegers_of_norm_le_mul_sqrt_discr :
∃ (a : 𝓞 K), a ≠ 0 ∧
|Algebra.norm ℚ (a : K)| ≤ (4 / π) ^ NrComplexPlaces K *
(finrank ℚ K).factorial / (finrank ℚ K) ^ (finrank ℚ K) * Real.sqrt |discr K| := by
obtain ⟨_, h_mem, h_nz, h_nm⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_of_norm_le_mul_sqrt_discr K ↑1
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := (FractionalIdeal.mem_one_iff _).mp h_mem
refine ⟨a, ne_zero_of_map h_nz, ?_⟩
simp_rw [Units.val_one, FractionalIdeal.absNorm_one, Rat.cast_one, one_mul] at h_nm
exact h_nm
variable {K}
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/Discriminant.lean | 165 | 200 | theorem abs_discr_ge (h : 1 < finrank ℚ K) :
(4 / 9 : ℝ) * (3 * π / 4) ^ finrank ℚ K ≤ |discr K| := by |
-- We use `exists_ne_zero_mem_ringOfIntegers_of_norm_le_mul_sqrt_discr` to get a nonzero
-- algebraic integer `x` of small norm and the fact that `1 ≤ |Norm x|` to get a lower bound
-- on `sqrt |discr K|`.
obtain ⟨x, h_nz, h_bd⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_ringOfIntegers_of_norm_le_mul_sqrt_discr K
have h_nm : (1 : ℝ) ≤ |Algebra.norm ℚ (x : K)| := by
rw [← Algebra.coe_norm_int, ← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_abs, Rat.cast_intCast, Int.cast_le]
exact Int.one_le_abs (Algebra.norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h_nz)
replace h_bd := le_trans h_nm h_bd
rw [← inv_mul_le_iff (by positivity), inv_div, mul_one, Real.le_sqrt (by positivity)
(by positivity), ← Int.cast_abs, div_pow, mul_pow, ← pow_mul, ← pow_mul] at h_bd
refine le_trans ?_ h_bd
-- The sequence `a n` is a lower bound for `|discr K|`. We prove below by induction an uniform
-- lower bound for this sequence from which we deduce the result.
let a : ℕ → ℝ := fun n => (n : ℝ) ^ (n * 2) / ((4 / π) ^ n * (n.factorial : ℝ) ^ 2)
suffices ∀ n, 2 ≤ n → (4 / 9 : ℝ) * (3 * π / 4) ^ n ≤ a n by
refine le_trans (this (finrank ℚ K) h) ?_
simp only [a]
gcongr
· exact (one_le_div Real.pi_pos).2 Real.pi_le_four
· rw [← card_add_two_mul_card_eq_rank, mul_comm]
exact Nat.le_add_left _ _
intro n hn
induction n, hn using Nat.le_induction with
| base => exact le_of_eq <| by norm_num [a, Nat.factorial_two]; field_simp; ring
| succ m _ h_m =>
suffices (3 : ℝ) ≤ (1 + 1 / m : ℝ) ^ (2 * m) by
convert_to _ ≤ (a m) * (1 + 1 / m : ℝ) ^ (2 * m) / (4 / π)
· simp_rw [a, add_mul, one_mul, pow_succ, Nat.factorial_succ]
field_simp; ring
· rw [_root_.le_div_iff (by positivity), pow_succ]
convert (mul_le_mul h_m this (by positivity) (by positivity)) using 1
field_simp; ring
refine le_trans (le_of_eq (by field_simp; norm_num)) (one_add_mul_le_pow ?_ (2 * m))
exact le_trans (by norm_num : (-2 : ℝ) ≤ 0) (by positivity)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury G. Kudryashov, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
#align_import algebra.monoid_algebra.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"949dc57e616a621462062668c9f39e4e17b64b69"
/-!
# Monoid algebras
When the domain of a `Finsupp` has a multiplicative or additive structure, we can define
a convolution product. To mathematicians this structure is known as the "monoid algebra",
i.e. the finite formal linear combinations over a given semiring of elements of the monoid.
The "group ring" ℤ[G] or the "group algebra" k[G] are typical uses.
In fact the construction of the "monoid algebra" makes sense when `G` is not even a monoid, but
merely a magma, i.e., when `G` carries a multiplication which is not required to satisfy any
conditions at all. In this case the construction yields a not-necessarily-unital,
not-necessarily-associative algebra but it is still adjoint to the forgetful functor from such
algebras to magmas, and we prove this as `MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma`.
In this file we define `MonoidAlgebra k G := G →₀ k`, and `AddMonoidAlgebra k G`
in the same way, and then define the convolution product on these.
When the domain is additive, this is used to define polynomials:
```
Polynomial R := AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
MvPolynomial σ α := AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
```
When the domain is multiplicative, e.g. a group, this will be used to define the group ring.
## Notation
We introduce the notation `R[A]` for `AddMonoidAlgebra R A`.
## Implementation note
Unfortunately because additive and multiplicative structures both appear in both cases,
it doesn't appear to be possible to make much use of `to_additive`, and we just settle for
saying everything twice.
Similarly, I attempted to just define
`k[G] := MonoidAlgebra k (Multiplicative G)`, but the definitional equality
`Multiplicative G = G` leaks through everywhere, and seems impossible to use.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Finsupp hiding single mapDomain
universe u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variable (k : Type u₁) (G : Type u₂) (H : Type*) {R : Type*}
/-! ### Multiplicative monoids -/
section
variable [Semiring k]
/-- The monoid algebra over a semiring `k` generated by the monoid `G`.
It is the type of finite formal `k`-linear combinations of terms of `G`,
endowed with the convolution product.
-/
def MonoidAlgebra : Type max u₁ u₂ :=
G →₀ k
#align monoid_algebra MonoidAlgebra
-- Porting note: The compiler couldn't derive this.
instance MonoidAlgebra.inhabited : Inhabited (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (G →₀ k))
#align monoid_algebra.inhabited MonoidAlgebra.inhabited
-- Porting note: The compiler couldn't derive this.
instance MonoidAlgebra.addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (G →₀ k))
#align monoid_algebra.add_comm_monoid MonoidAlgebra.addCommMonoid
instance MonoidAlgebra.instIsCancelAdd [IsCancelAdd k] : IsCancelAdd (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsCancelAdd (G →₀ k))
instance MonoidAlgebra.coeFun : CoeFun (MonoidAlgebra k G) fun _ => G → k :=
Finsupp.instCoeFun
#align monoid_algebra.has_coe_to_fun MonoidAlgebra.coeFun
end
namespace MonoidAlgebra
variable {k G}
section
variable [Semiring k] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R]
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local`, so we replace some definitions and theorems with
-- new ones which have new types.
abbrev single (a : G) (b : k) : MonoidAlgebra k G := Finsupp.single a b
theorem single_zero (a : G) : (single a 0 : MonoidAlgebra k G) = 0 := Finsupp.single_zero a
theorem single_add (a : G) (b₁ b₂ : k) : single a (b₁ + b₂) = single a b₁ + single a b₂ :=
Finsupp.single_add a b₁ b₂
@[simp]
theorem sum_single_index {N} [AddCommMonoid N] {a : G} {b : k} {h : G → k → N}
(h_zero : h a 0 = 0) :
(single a b).sum h = h a b := Finsupp.sum_single_index h_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_single (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) : f.sum single = f :=
Finsupp.sum_single f
theorem single_apply {a a' : G} {b : k} [Decidable (a = a')] :
single a b a' = if a = a' then b else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem single_eq_zero {a : G} {b : k} : single a b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := Finsupp.single_eq_zero
abbrev mapDomain {G' : Type*} (f : G → G') (v : MonoidAlgebra k G) : MonoidAlgebra k G' :=
Finsupp.mapDomain f v
theorem mapDomain_sum {k' G' : Type*} [Semiring k'] {f : G → G'} {s : MonoidAlgebra k' G}
{v : G → k' → MonoidAlgebra k G} :
mapDomain f (s.sum v) = s.sum fun a b => mapDomain f (v a b) :=
Finsupp.mapDomain_sum
/-- A non-commutative version of `MonoidAlgebra.lift`: given an additive homomorphism `f : k →+ R`
and a homomorphism `g : G → R`, returns the additive homomorphism from
`MonoidAlgebra k G` such that `liftNC f g (single a b) = f b * g a`. If `f` is a ring homomorphism
and the range of either `f` or `g` is in center of `R`, then the result is a ring homomorphism. If
`R` is a `k`-algebra and `f = algebraMap k R`, then the result is an algebra homomorphism called
`MonoidAlgebra.lift`. -/
def liftNC (f : k →+ R) (g : G → R) : MonoidAlgebra k G →+ R :=
liftAddHom fun x : G => (AddMonoidHom.mulRight (g x)).comp f
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc MonoidAlgebra.liftNC
@[simp]
theorem liftNC_single (f : k →+ R) (g : G → R) (a : G) (b : k) :
liftNC f g (single a b) = f b * g a :=
liftAddHom_apply_single _ _ _
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_single MonoidAlgebra.liftNC_single
end
section Mul
variable [Semiring k] [Mul G]
/-- The multiplication in a monoid algebra. We make it irreducible so that Lean doesn't unfold
it trying to unify two things that are different. -/
@[irreducible] def mul' (f g : MonoidAlgebra k G) : MonoidAlgebra k G :=
f.sum fun a₁ b₁ => g.sum fun a₂ b₂ => single (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂)
/-- The product of `f g : MonoidAlgebra k G` is the finitely supported function
whose value at `a` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all pairs `x, y`
such that `x * y = a`. (Think of the group ring of a group.) -/
instance instMul : Mul (MonoidAlgebra k G) := ⟨MonoidAlgebra.mul'⟩
#align monoid_algebra.has_mul MonoidAlgebra.instMul
theorem mul_def {f g : MonoidAlgebra k G} :
f * g = f.sum fun a₁ b₁ => g.sum fun a₂ b₂ => single (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) := by
with_unfolding_all rfl
#align monoid_algebra.mul_def MonoidAlgebra.mul_def
instance nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ Finsupp.instAddCommMonoid with
-- Porting note: `refine` & `exact` are required because `simp` behaves differently.
left_distrib := fun f g h => by
haveI := Classical.decEq G
simp only [mul_def]
refine Eq.trans (congr_arg (sum f) (funext₂ fun a₁ b₁ => sum_add_index ?_ ?_)) ?_ <;>
simp only [mul_add, mul_zero, single_zero, single_add, forall_true_iff, sum_add]
right_distrib := fun f g h => by
haveI := Classical.decEq G
simp only [mul_def]
refine Eq.trans (sum_add_index ?_ ?_) ?_ <;>
simp only [add_mul, zero_mul, single_zero, single_add, forall_true_iff, sum_zero, sum_add]
zero_mul := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def]
exact sum_zero_index
mul_zero := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def]
exact Eq.trans (congr_arg (sum f) (funext₂ fun a₁ b₁ => sum_zero_index)) sum_zero }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_non_assoc_semiring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [Semiring R]
theorem liftNC_mul {g_hom : Type*} [FunLike g_hom G R] [MulHomClass g_hom G R]
(f : k →+* R) (g : g_hom) (a b : MonoidAlgebra k G)
(h_comm : ∀ {x y}, y ∈ a.support → Commute (f (b x)) (g y)) :
liftNC (f : k →+ R) g (a * b) = liftNC (f : k →+ R) g a * liftNC (f : k →+ R) g b := by
conv_rhs => rw [← sum_single a, ← sum_single b]
-- Porting note: `(liftNC _ g).map_finsupp_sum` → `map_finsupp_sum`
simp_rw [mul_def, map_finsupp_sum, liftNC_single, Finsupp.sum_mul, Finsupp.mul_sum]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun y hy => Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x _hx => ?_
simp [mul_assoc, (h_comm hy).left_comm]
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_mul MonoidAlgebra.liftNC_mul
end Mul
section Semigroup
variable [Semiring k] [Semigroup G] [Semiring R]
instance nonUnitalSemiring : NonUnitalSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring with
mul_assoc := fun f g h => by
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
simp only [mul_def]
rw [sum_sum_index]; congr; ext a₁ b₁
rw [sum_sum_index, sum_sum_index]; congr; ext a₂ b₂
rw [sum_sum_index, sum_single_index]; congr; ext a₃ b₃
rw [sum_single_index, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
all_goals simp only [single_zero, single_add, forall_true_iff, add_mul,
mul_add, zero_mul, mul_zero, sum_zero, sum_add] }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_semiring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring
end Semigroup
section One
variable [NonAssocSemiring R] [Semiring k] [One G]
/-- The unit of the multiplication is `single 1 1`, i.e. the function
that is `1` at `1` and zero elsewhere. -/
instance one : One (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
⟨single 1 1⟩
#align monoid_algebra.has_one MonoidAlgebra.one
theorem one_def : (1 : MonoidAlgebra k G) = single 1 1 :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.one_def MonoidAlgebra.one_def
@[simp]
theorem liftNC_one {g_hom : Type*} [FunLike g_hom G R] [OneHomClass g_hom G R]
(f : k →+* R) (g : g_hom) :
liftNC (f : k →+ R) g 1 = 1 := by simp [one_def]
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_one MonoidAlgebra.liftNC_one
end One
section MulOneClass
variable [Semiring k] [MulOneClass G]
instance nonAssocSemiring : NonAssocSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring with
natCast := fun n => single 1 n
natCast_zero := by simp
natCast_succ := fun _ => by simp; rfl
one_mul := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def, one_def, sum_single_index, zero_mul, single_zero, sum_zero, zero_add,
one_mul, sum_single]
mul_one := fun f => by
simp only [mul_def, one_def, sum_single_index, mul_zero, single_zero, sum_zero, add_zero,
mul_one, sum_single] }
#align monoid_algebra.non_assoc_semiring MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocSemiring
theorem natCast_def (n : ℕ) : (n : MonoidAlgebra k G) = single (1 : G) (n : k) :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.nat_cast_def MonoidAlgebra.natCast_def
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_def := natCast_def
end MulOneClass
/-! #### Semiring structure -/
section Semiring
variable [Semiring k] [Monoid G]
instance semiring : Semiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring,
MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocSemiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.semiring MonoidAlgebra.semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- `liftNC` as a `RingHom`, for when `f x` and `g y` commute -/
def liftNCRingHom (f : k →+* R) (g : G →* R) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
MonoidAlgebra k G →+* R :=
{ liftNC (f : k →+ R) g with
map_one' := liftNC_one _ _
map_mul' := fun _a _b => liftNC_mul _ _ _ _ fun {_ _} _ => h_comm _ _ }
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_ring_hom MonoidAlgebra.liftNCRingHom
end Semiring
instance nonUnitalCommSemiring [CommSemiring k] [CommSemigroup G] :
NonUnitalCommSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring with
mul_comm := fun f g => by
simp only [mul_def, Finsupp.sum, mul_comm]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
simp only [mul_comm] }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_comm_semiring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommSemiring
instance nontrivial [Semiring k] [Nontrivial k] [Nonempty G] : Nontrivial (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.instNontrivial
#align monoid_algebra.nontrivial MonoidAlgebra.nontrivial
/-! #### Derived instances -/
section DerivedInstances
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring k] [CommMonoid G] : CommSemiring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommSemiring, MonoidAlgebra.semiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.comm_semiring MonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance unique [Semiring k] [Subsingleton k] : Unique (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.uniqueOfRight
#align monoid_algebra.unique MonoidAlgebra.unique
instance addCommGroup [Ring k] : AddCommGroup (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.instAddCommGroup
#align monoid_algebra.add_comm_group MonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup
instance nonUnitalNonAssocRing [Ring k] [Mul G] : NonUnitalNonAssocRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup, MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_non_assoc_ring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalNonAssocRing
instance nonUnitalRing [Ring k] [Semigroup G] : NonUnitalRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup, MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalSemiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_ring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalRing
instance nonAssocRing [Ring k] [MulOneClass G] : NonAssocRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.addCommGroup,
MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocSemiring with
intCast := fun z => single 1 (z : k)
-- Porting note: Both were `simpa`.
intCast_ofNat := fun n => by simp; rfl
intCast_negSucc := fun n => by simp; rfl }
#align monoid_algebra.non_assoc_ring MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocRing
theorem intCast_def [Ring k] [MulOneClass G] (z : ℤ) :
(z : MonoidAlgebra k G) = single (1 : G) (z : k) :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.int_cast_def MonoidAlgebra.intCast_def
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_def := intCast_def
instance ring [Ring k] [Monoid G] : Ring (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonAssocRing, MonoidAlgebra.semiring with }
#align monoid_algebra.ring MonoidAlgebra.ring
instance nonUnitalCommRing [CommRing k] [CommSemigroup G] :
NonUnitalCommRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommSemiring, MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalRing with }
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_comm_ring MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommRing
instance commRing [CommRing k] [CommMonoid G] : CommRing (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalCommRing, MonoidAlgebra.ring with }
#align monoid_algebra.comm_ring MonoidAlgebra.commRing
variable {S : Type*}
instance smulZeroClass [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] : SMulZeroClass R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.smulZeroClass
#align monoid_algebra.smul_zero_class MonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance distribSMul [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] : DistribSMul R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.distribSMul _ _
#align monoid_algebra.distrib_smul MonoidAlgebra.distribSMul
instance distribMulAction [Monoid R] [Semiring k] [DistribMulAction R k] :
DistribMulAction R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.distribMulAction G k
#align monoid_algebra.distrib_mul_action MonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance module [Semiring R] [Semiring k] [Module R k] : Module R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.module G k
#align monoid_algebra.module MonoidAlgebra.module
instance faithfulSMul [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [FaithfulSMul R k] [Nonempty G] :
FaithfulSMul R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.faithfulSMul
#align monoid_algebra.has_faithful_smul MonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance isScalarTower [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [SMulZeroClass S k] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S k] : IsScalarTower R S (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.isScalarTower G k
#align monoid_algebra.is_scalar_tower MonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [SMulZeroClass S k] [SMulCommClass R S k] :
SMulCommClass R S (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.smulCommClass G k
#align monoid_algebra.smul_comm_tower MonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [Semiring k] [SMulZeroClass R k] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ k]
[IsCentralScalar R k] : IsCentralScalar R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.isCentralScalar G k
#align monoid_algebra.is_central_scalar MonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
/-- This is not an instance as it conflicts with `MonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction` when `G = kˣ`.
-/
def comapDistribMulActionSelf [Group G] [Semiring k] : DistribMulAction G (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
Finsupp.comapDistribMulAction
#align monoid_algebra.comap_distrib_mul_action_self MonoidAlgebra.comapDistribMulActionSelf
end DerivedInstances
section MiscTheorems
variable [Semiring k]
-- attribute [local reducible] MonoidAlgebra -- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local`.
theorem mul_apply [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f g : MonoidAlgebra k G) (x : G) :
(f * g) x = f.sum fun a₁ b₁ => g.sum fun a₂ b₂ => if a₁ * a₂ = x then b₁ * b₂ else 0 := by
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
rw [mul_def, Finsupp.sum_apply]; congr; ext
rw [Finsupp.sum_apply]; congr; ext
apply single_apply
#align monoid_algebra.mul_apply MonoidAlgebra.mul_apply
theorem mul_apply_antidiagonal [Mul G] (f g : MonoidAlgebra k G) (x : G) (s : Finset (G × G))
(hs : ∀ {p : G × G}, p ∈ s ↔ p.1 * p.2 = x) : (f * g) x = ∑ p ∈ s, f p.1 * g p.2 := by
classical exact
let F : G × G → k := fun p => if p.1 * p.2 = x then f p.1 * g p.2 else 0
calc
(f * g) x = ∑ a₁ ∈ f.support, ∑ a₂ ∈ g.support, F (a₁, a₂) := mul_apply f g x
_ = ∑ p ∈ f.support ×ˢ g.support, F p := Finset.sum_product.symm
_ = ∑ p ∈ (f.support ×ˢ g.support).filter fun p : G × G => p.1 * p.2 = x, f p.1 * g p.2 :=
(Finset.sum_filter _ _).symm
_ = ∑ p ∈ s.filter fun p : G × G => p.1 ∈ f.support ∧ p.2 ∈ g.support, f p.1 * g p.2 :=
(sum_congr
(by
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_product, hs, and_comm])
fun _ _ => rfl)
_ = ∑ p ∈ s, f p.1 * g p.2 :=
sum_subset (filter_subset _ _) fun p hps hp => by
simp only [mem_filter, mem_support_iff, not_and, Classical.not_not] at hp ⊢
by_cases h1 : f p.1 = 0
· rw [h1, zero_mul]
· rw [hp hps h1, mul_zero]
#align monoid_algebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal MonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem single_mul_single [Mul G] {a₁ a₂ : G} {b₁ b₂ : k} :
single a₁ b₁ * single a₂ b₂ = single (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) := by
rw [mul_def]
exact (sum_single_index (by simp only [zero_mul, single_zero, sum_zero])).trans
(sum_single_index (by rw [mul_zero, single_zero]))
#align monoid_algebra.single_mul_single MonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
theorem single_commute_single [Mul G] {a₁ a₂ : G} {b₁ b₂ : k}
(ha : Commute a₁ a₂) (hb : Commute b₁ b₂) :
Commute (single a₁ b₁) (single a₂ b₂) :=
single_mul_single.trans <| congr_arg₂ single ha hb |>.trans single_mul_single.symm
theorem single_commute [Mul G] {a : G} {b : k} (ha : ∀ a', Commute a a') (hb : ∀ b', Commute b b') :
∀ f : MonoidAlgebra k G, Commute (single a b) f :=
suffices AddMonoidHom.mulLeft (single a b) = AddMonoidHom.mulRight (single a b) from
DFunLike.congr_fun this
addHom_ext' fun a' => AddMonoidHom.ext fun b' => single_commute_single (ha a') (hb b')
@[simp]
theorem single_pow [Monoid G] {a : G} {b : k} : ∀ n : ℕ, single a b ^ n = single (a ^ n) (b ^ n)
| 0 => by
simp only [pow_zero]
rfl
| n + 1 => by simp only [pow_succ, single_pow n, single_mul_single]
#align monoid_algebra.single_pow MonoidAlgebra.single_pow
section
/-- Like `Finsupp.mapDomain_zero`, but for the `1` we define in this file -/
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_one {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} [Semiring β] [One α] [One α₂]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F α α₂] [OneHomClass F α α₂] (f : F) :
(mapDomain f (1 : MonoidAlgebra β α) : MonoidAlgebra β α₂) = (1 : MonoidAlgebra β α₂) := by
simp_rw [one_def, mapDomain_single, map_one]
#align monoid_algebra.map_domain_one MonoidAlgebra.mapDomain_one
/-- Like `Finsupp.mapDomain_add`, but for the convolutive multiplication we define in this file -/
theorem mapDomain_mul {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} [Semiring β] [Mul α] [Mul α₂]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F α α₂] [MulHomClass F α α₂] (f : F) (x y : MonoidAlgebra β α) :
mapDomain f (x * y) = mapDomain f x * mapDomain f y := by
simp_rw [mul_def, mapDomain_sum, mapDomain_single, map_mul]
rw [Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index]
· congr
ext a b
rw [Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index]
· simp
· simp [mul_add]
· simp
· simp [add_mul]
#align monoid_algebra.map_domain_mul MonoidAlgebra.mapDomain_mul
variable (k G)
/-- The embedding of a magma into its magma algebra. -/
@[simps]
def ofMagma [Mul G] : G →ₙ* MonoidAlgebra k G where
toFun a := single a 1
map_mul' a b := by simp only [mul_def, mul_one, sum_single_index, single_eq_zero, mul_zero]
#align monoid_algebra.of_magma MonoidAlgebra.ofMagma
#align monoid_algebra.of_magma_apply MonoidAlgebra.ofMagma_apply
/-- The embedding of a unital magma into its magma algebra. -/
@[simps]
def of [MulOneClass G] : G →* MonoidAlgebra k G :=
{ ofMagma k G with
toFun := fun a => single a 1
map_one' := rfl }
#align monoid_algebra.of MonoidAlgebra.of
#align monoid_algebra.of_apply MonoidAlgebra.of_apply
end
theorem smul_of [MulOneClass G] (g : G) (r : k) : r • of k G g = single g r := by
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp`.
rw [of_apply, smul_single', mul_one]
#align monoid_algebra.smul_of MonoidAlgebra.smul_of
theorem of_injective [MulOneClass G] [Nontrivial k] :
Function.Injective (of k G) := fun a b h => by
simpa using (single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _).mp h
#align monoid_algebra.of_injective MonoidAlgebra.of_injective
theorem of_commute [MulOneClass G] {a : G} (h : ∀ a', Commute a a') (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
Commute (of k G a) f :=
single_commute h Commute.one_left f
/-- `Finsupp.single` as a `MonoidHom` from the product type into the monoid algebra.
Note the order of the elements of the product are reversed compared to the arguments of
`Finsupp.single`.
-/
@[simps]
def singleHom [MulOneClass G] : k × G →* MonoidAlgebra k G where
toFun a := single a.2 a.1
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _a _b := single_mul_single.symm
#align monoid_algebra.single_hom MonoidAlgebra.singleHom
#align monoid_algebra.single_hom_apply MonoidAlgebra.singleHom_apply
theorem mul_single_apply_aux [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) {r : k} {x y z : G}
(H : ∀ a, a * x = z ↔ a = y) : (f * single x r) z = f y * r := by
classical exact
have A :
∀ a₁ b₁,
((single x r).sum fun a₂ b₂ => ite (a₁ * a₂ = z) (b₁ * b₂) 0) =
ite (a₁ * x = z) (b₁ * r) 0 :=
fun a₁ b₁ => sum_single_index <| by simp
calc
(HMul.hMul (β := MonoidAlgebra k G) f (single x r)) z =
sum f fun a b => if a = y then b * r else 0 := by simp only [mul_apply, A, H]
_ = if y ∈ f.support then f y * r else 0 := f.support.sum_ite_eq' _ _
_ = f y * r := by split_ifs with h <;> simp at h <;> simp [h]
#align monoid_algebra.mul_single_apply_aux MonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_aux
theorem mul_single_one_apply [MulOneClass G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k) (x : G) :
(HMul.hMul (β := MonoidAlgebra k G) f (single 1 r)) x = f x * r :=
f.mul_single_apply_aux fun a => by rw [mul_one]
#align monoid_algebra.mul_single_one_apply MonoidAlgebra.mul_single_one_apply
theorem mul_single_apply_of_not_exists_mul [Mul G] (r : k) {g g' : G} (x : MonoidAlgebra k G)
(h : ¬∃ d, g' = d * g) : (x * single g r) g' = 0 := by
classical
rw [mul_apply, Finsupp.sum_comm, Finsupp.sum_single_index]
swap
· simp_rw [Finsupp.sum, mul_zero, ite_self, Finset.sum_const_zero]
· apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
simp_rw [ite_eq_right_iff]
rintro g'' _hg'' rfl
exfalso
exact h ⟨_, rfl⟩
#align monoid_algebra.mul_single_apply_of_not_exists_mul MonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_of_not_exists_mul
theorem single_mul_apply_aux [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) {r : k} {x y z : G}
(H : ∀ a, x * a = y ↔ a = z) : (single x r * f) y = r * f z := by
classical exact
have : (f.sum fun a b => ite (x * a = y) (0 * b) 0) = 0 := by simp
calc
(HMul.hMul (α := MonoidAlgebra k G) (single x r) f) y =
sum f fun a b => ite (x * a = y) (r * b) 0 :=
(mul_apply _ _ _).trans <| sum_single_index this
_ = f.sum fun a b => ite (a = z) (r * b) 0 := by simp only [H]
_ = if z ∈ f.support then r * f z else 0 := f.support.sum_ite_eq' _ _
_ = _ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp at h <;> simp [h]
#align monoid_algebra.single_mul_apply_aux MonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_aux
theorem single_one_mul_apply [MulOneClass G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k) (x : G) :
(single (1 : G) r * f) x = r * f x :=
f.single_mul_apply_aux fun a => by rw [one_mul]
#align monoid_algebra.single_one_mul_apply MonoidAlgebra.single_one_mul_apply
theorem single_mul_apply_of_not_exists_mul [Mul G] (r : k) {g g' : G} (x : MonoidAlgebra k G)
(h : ¬∃ d, g' = g * d) : (single g r * x) g' = 0 := by
classical
rw [mul_apply, Finsupp.sum_single_index]
swap
· simp_rw [Finsupp.sum, zero_mul, ite_self, Finset.sum_const_zero]
· apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
simp_rw [ite_eq_right_iff]
rintro g'' _hg'' rfl
exfalso
exact h ⟨_, rfl⟩
#align monoid_algebra.single_mul_apply_of_not_exists_mul MonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_of_not_exists_mul
theorem liftNC_smul [MulOneClass G] {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (f : k →+* R) (g : G →* R) (c : k)
(φ : MonoidAlgebra k G) : liftNC (f : k →+ R) g (c • φ) = f c * liftNC (f : k →+ R) g φ := by
suffices (liftNC (↑f) g).comp (smulAddHom k (MonoidAlgebra k G) c) =
(AddMonoidHom.mulLeft (f c)).comp (liftNC (↑f) g) from
DFunLike.congr_fun this φ
-- Porting note: `ext` couldn't a find appropriate theorem.
refine addHom_ext' fun a => AddMonoidHom.ext fun b => ?_
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so the proof gets more complex.
unfold MonoidAlgebra
simp only [AddMonoidHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, singleAddHom_apply, smulAddHom_apply,
smul_single, smul_eq_mul, AddMonoidHom.coe_mulLeft]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [liftNC_single, liftNC_single]; rw [AddMonoidHom.coe_coe, map_mul, mul_assoc]
#align monoid_algebra.lift_nc_smul MonoidAlgebra.liftNC_smul
end MiscTheorems
/-! #### Non-unital, non-associative algebra structure -/
section NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
variable (k) [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] [Mul G]
instance isScalarTower_self [IsScalarTower R k k] :
IsScalarTower R (MonoidAlgebra k G) (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
⟨fun t a b => by
-- Porting note: `ext` → `refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_`
refine Finsupp.ext fun m => ?_
-- Porting note: `refine` & `rw` are required because `simp` behaves differently.
classical
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_apply]
rw [coe_smul]
refine Eq.trans (sum_smul_index' (g := a) (b := t) ?_) ?_ <;>
simp only [mul_apply, Finsupp.smul_sum, smul_ite, smul_mul_assoc,
zero_mul, ite_self, imp_true_iff, sum_zero, Pi.smul_apply, smul_zero]⟩
#align monoid_algebra.is_scalar_tower_self MonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self
/-- Note that if `k` is a `CommSemiring` then we have `SMulCommClass k k k` and so we can take
`R = k` in the below. In other words, if the coefficients are commutative amongst themselves, they
also commute with the algebra multiplication. -/
instance smulCommClass_self [SMulCommClass R k k] :
SMulCommClass R (MonoidAlgebra k G) (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
⟨fun t a b => by
-- Porting note: `ext` → `refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_`
refine Finsupp.ext fun m => ?_
-- Porting note: `refine` & `rw` are required because `simp` behaves differently.
classical
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_apply]
rw [coe_smul]
refine Eq.symm (Eq.trans (congr_arg (sum a)
(funext₂ fun a₁ b₁ => sum_smul_index' (g := b) (b := t) ?_)) ?_) <;>
simp only [mul_apply, Finsupp.sum, Finset.smul_sum, smul_ite, mul_smul_comm,
imp_true_iff, ite_eq_right_iff, Pi.smul_apply, mul_zero, smul_zero]⟩
#align monoid_algebra.smul_comm_class_self MonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self
instance smulCommClass_symm_self [SMulCommClass k R k] :
SMulCommClass (MonoidAlgebra k G) R (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
⟨fun t a b => by
haveI := SMulCommClass.symm k R k
rw [← smul_comm]⟩
#align monoid_algebra.smul_comm_class_symm_self MonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_symm_self
variable {A : Type u₃} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
/-- A non_unital `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
NonUnitalAlgHom.to_distribMulActionHom_injective <|
Finsupp.distribMulActionHom_ext' fun a => DistribMulActionHom.ext_ring (h a)
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_alg_hom_ext MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : φ₁.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) = φ₂.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
nonUnitalAlgHom_ext k <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
#align monoid_algebra.non_unital_alg_hom_ext' MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext'
/-- The functor `G ↦ MonoidAlgebra k G`, from the category of magmas to the category of non-unital,
non-associative algebras over `k` is adjoint to the forgetful functor in the other direction. -/
@[simps apply_apply symm_apply]
def liftMagma [Module k A] [IsScalarTower k A A] [SMulCommClass k A A] :
(G →ₙ* A) ≃ (MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A) where
toFun f :=
{ liftAddHom fun x => (smulAddHom k A).flip (f x) with
toFun := fun a => a.sum fun m t => t • f m
map_smul' := fun t' a => by
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
beta_reduce
rw [Finsupp.smul_sum, sum_smul_index']
· simp_rw [smul_assoc, MonoidHom.id_apply]
· intro m
exact zero_smul k (f m)
map_mul' := fun a₁ a₂ => by
let g : G → k → A := fun m t => t • f m
have h₁ : ∀ m, g m 0 = 0 := by
intro m
exact zero_smul k (f m)
have h₂ : ∀ (m) (t₁ t₂ : k), g m (t₁ + t₂) = g m t₁ + g m t₂ := by
intros
rw [← add_smul]
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
simp_rw [Finsupp.mul_sum, Finsupp.sum_mul, smul_mul_smul, ← f.map_mul, mul_def,
sum_comm a₂ a₁]
rw [sum_sum_index h₁ h₂]; congr; ext
rw [sum_sum_index h₁ h₂]; congr; ext
rw [sum_single_index (h₁ _)] }
invFun F := F.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)
left_inv f := by
ext m
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_mk, ofMagma_apply, NonUnitalAlgHom.toMulHom_eq_coe,
sum_single_index, Function.comp_apply, one_smul, zero_smul, MulHom.coe_comp,
NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_to_mulHom]
right_inv F := by
-- Porting note: `ext` → `refine nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' k (MulHom.ext fun m => ?_)`
refine nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' k (MulHom.ext fun m => ?_)
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_mk, ofMagma_apply, NonUnitalAlgHom.toMulHom_eq_coe,
sum_single_index, Function.comp_apply, one_smul, zero_smul, MulHom.coe_comp,
NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_to_mulHom]
#align monoid_algebra.lift_magma MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma
#align monoid_algebra.lift_magma_apply_apply MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma_apply_apply
#align monoid_algebra.lift_magma_symm_apply MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma_symm_apply
end NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
/-! #### Algebra structure -/
section Algebra
-- attribute [local reducible] MonoidAlgebra -- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local`.
theorem single_one_comm [CommSemiring k] [MulOneClass G] (r : k) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
single (1 : G) r * f = f * single (1 : G) r :=
single_commute Commute.one_left (Commute.all _) f
#align monoid_algebra.single_one_comm MonoidAlgebra.single_one_comm
/-- `Finsupp.single 1` as a `RingHom` -/
@[simps]
def singleOneRingHom [Semiring k] [MulOneClass G] : k →+* MonoidAlgebra k G :=
{ Finsupp.singleAddHom 1 with
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := fun x y => by
-- Porting note (#10691): Was `rw`.
simp only [ZeroHom.toFun_eq_coe, AddMonoidHom.toZeroHom_coe, singleAddHom_apply,
single_mul_single, mul_one] }
#align monoid_algebra.single_one_ring_hom MonoidAlgebra.singleOneRingHom
#align monoid_algebra.single_one_ring_hom_apply MonoidAlgebra.singleOneRingHom_apply
/-- If `f : G → H` is a multiplicative homomorphism between two monoids, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is a ring homomorphism between their monoid algebras. -/
@[simps]
def mapDomainRingHom (k : Type*) {H F : Type*} [Semiring k] [Monoid G] [Monoid H]
[FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) : MonoidAlgebra k G →+* MonoidAlgebra k H :=
{ (Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : MonoidAlgebra k G →+ MonoidAlgebra k H) with
map_one' := mapDomain_one f
map_mul' := fun x y => mapDomain_mul f x y }
#align monoid_algebra.map_domain_ring_hom MonoidAlgebra.mapDomainRingHom
#align monoid_algebra.map_domain_ring_hom_apply MonoidAlgebra.mapDomainRingHom_apply
/-- If two ring homomorphisms from `MonoidAlgebra k G` are equal on all `single a 1`
and `single 1 b`, then they are equal. -/
theorem ringHom_ext {R} [Semiring k] [MulOneClass G] [Semiring R] {f g : MonoidAlgebra k G →+* R}
(h₁ : ∀ b, f (single 1 b) = g (single 1 b)) (h_of : ∀ a, f (single a 1) = g (single a 1)) :
f = g :=
RingHom.coe_addMonoidHom_injective <|
addHom_ext fun a b => by
rw [← single, ← one_mul a, ← mul_one b, ← single_mul_single]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [AddMonoidHom.coe_coe f, AddMonoidHom.coe_coe g]; rw [f.map_mul, g.map_mul, h₁, h_of]
#align monoid_algebra.ring_hom_ext MonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext
/-- If two ring homomorphisms from `MonoidAlgebra k G` are equal on all `single a 1`
and `single 1 b`, then they are equal.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem ringHom_ext' {R} [Semiring k] [MulOneClass G] [Semiring R] {f g : MonoidAlgebra k G →+* R}
(h₁ : f.comp singleOneRingHom = g.comp singleOneRingHom)
(h_of :
(f : MonoidAlgebra k G →* R).comp (of k G) = (g : MonoidAlgebra k G →* R).comp (of k G)) :
f = g :=
ringHom_ext (RingHom.congr_fun h₁) (DFunLike.congr_fun h_of)
#align monoid_algebra.ring_hom_ext' MonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext'
/-- The instance `Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra A G)` whenever we have `Algebra k A`.
In particular this provides the instance `Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra k G)`.
-/
instance algebra {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra A G) :=
{ singleOneRingHom.comp (algebraMap k A) with
-- Porting note: `ext` → `refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_`
smul_def' := fun r a => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
-- Porting note: Newly required.
rw [Finsupp.coe_smul]
simp [single_one_mul_apply, Algebra.smul_def, Pi.smul_apply]
commutes' := fun r f => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [single_one_mul_apply, mul_single_one_apply, Algebra.commutes] }
/-- `Finsupp.single 1` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps! apply]
def singleOneAlgHom {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
A →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A G :=
{ singleOneRingHom with
commutes' := fun r => by
-- Porting note: `ext` → `refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_`
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp
rfl }
#align monoid_algebra.single_one_alg_hom MonoidAlgebra.singleOneAlgHom
#align monoid_algebra.single_one_alg_hom_apply MonoidAlgebra.singleOneAlgHom_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
⇑(algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G)) = single 1 ∘ algebraMap k A :=
rfl
#align monoid_algebra.coe_algebra_map MonoidAlgebra.coe_algebraMap
| Mathlib/Algebra/MonoidAlgebra/Basic.lean | 845 | 846 | theorem single_eq_algebraMap_mul_of [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] (a : G) (b : k) :
single a b = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra k G) b * of k G a := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# (Pre)images of intervals
In this file we prove a bunch of trivial lemmas like “if we add `a` to all points of `[b, c]`,
then we get `[a + b, a + c]`”. For the functions `x ↦ x ± a`, `x ↦ a ± x`, and `x ↦ -x` we prove
lemmas about preimages and images of all intervals. We also prove a few lemmas about images under
`x ↦ a * x`, `x ↦ x * a` and `x ↦ x⁻¹`.
-/
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Binary pointwise operations
Note that the subset operations below only cover the cases with the largest possible intervals on
the LHS: to conclude that `Ioo a b * Ioo c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (c * d)`, you can use monotonicity of `*`
and `Set.Ico_mul_Ioc_subset`.
TODO: repeat these lemmas for the generality of `mul_le_mul` (which assumes nonnegativity), which
the unprimed names have been reserved for
-/
section ContravariantLE
variable [Mul α] [Preorder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LE.le]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Icc c d ⊆ Icc (a * c) (b * d) := by
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_le_mul' hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iic b ⊆ Iic (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ici b ⊆ Ici (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
end ContravariantLE
section ContravariantLT
variable [Mul α] [PartialOrder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LT.lt]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Icc c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ioc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Ioc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ioc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Ioc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Ioc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Ioc c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iio_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iio_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iio b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
@[to_additive Iio_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iio_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iio a * Iic b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ioi_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ioi_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ioi a * Ici b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ioi_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ioi_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ioi b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
end ContravariantLT
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c : α)
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ici : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ici Set.preimage_const_add_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioi : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioi Set.preimage_const_add_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iic Set.preimage_const_add_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iio Set.preimage_const_add_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Icc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Icc Set.preimage_const_add_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ico : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ico Set.preimage_const_add_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioc Set.preimage_const_add_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioo : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioo Set.preimage_const_add_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ici : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ici Set.preimage_add_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioi : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioi Set.preimage_add_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iic Set.preimage_add_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iio Set.preimage_add_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Icc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Icc Set.preimage_add_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ico : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ico Set.preimage_add_const_Ico
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 202 | 203 | theorem preimage_add_const_Ioc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by |
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Benjamin Davidson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.ZPowers
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset
#align_import algebra.periodic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"30413fc89f202a090a54d78e540963ed3de0056e"
/-!
# Periodicity
In this file we define and then prove facts about periodic and antiperiodic functions.
## Main definitions
* `Function.Periodic`: A function `f` is *periodic* if `∀ x, f (x + c) = f x`.
`f` is referred to as periodic with period `c` or `c`-periodic.
* `Function.Antiperiodic`: A function `f` is *antiperiodic* if `∀ x, f (x + c) = -f x`.
`f` is referred to as antiperiodic with antiperiod `c` or `c`-antiperiodic.
Note that any `c`-antiperiodic function will necessarily also be `2 • c`-periodic.
## Tags
period, periodic, periodicity, antiperiodic
-/
variable {α β γ : Type*} {f g : α → β} {c c₁ c₂ x : α}
open Set
namespace Function
/-! ### Periodicity -/
/-- A function `f` is said to be `Periodic` with period `c` if for all `x`, `f (x + c) = f x`. -/
@[simp]
def Periodic [Add α] (f : α → β) (c : α) : Prop :=
∀ x : α, f (x + c) = f x
#align function.periodic Function.Periodic
protected theorem Periodic.funext [Add α] (h : Periodic f c) : (fun x => f (x + c)) = f :=
funext h
#align function.periodic.funext Function.Periodic.funext
protected theorem Periodic.comp [Add α] (h : Periodic f c) (g : β → γ) : Periodic (g ∘ f) c := by
simp_all
#align function.periodic.comp Function.Periodic.comp
theorem Periodic.comp_addHom [Add α] [Add γ] (h : Periodic f c) (g : AddHom γ α) (g_inv : α → γ)
(hg : RightInverse g_inv g) : Periodic (f ∘ g) (g_inv c) := fun x => by
simp only [hg c, h (g x), map_add, comp_apply]
#align function.periodic.comp_add_hom Function.Periodic.comp_addHom
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Periodic.mul [Add α] [Mul β] (hf : Periodic f c) (hg : Periodic g c) :
Periodic (f * g) c := by simp_all
#align function.periodic.mul Function.Periodic.mul
#align function.periodic.add Function.Periodic.add
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Periodic.div [Add α] [Div β] (hf : Periodic f c) (hg : Periodic g c) :
Periodic (f / g) c := by simp_all
#align function.periodic.div Function.Periodic.div
#align function.periodic.sub Function.Periodic.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.List.periodic_prod [Add α] [Monoid β] (l : List (α → β))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Periodic f c) : Periodic l.prod c := by
induction' l with g l ih hl
· simp
· rw [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
simpa only [List.prod_cons] using hl.1.mul (ih hl.2)
#align list.periodic_prod List.periodic_prod
#align list.periodic_sum List.periodic_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Multiset.periodic_prod [Add α] [CommMonoid β] (s : Multiset (α → β))
(hs : ∀ f ∈ s, Periodic f c) : Periodic s.prod c :=
(s.prod_toList ▸ s.toList.periodic_prod) fun f hf => hs f <| Multiset.mem_toList.mp hf
#align multiset.periodic_prod Multiset.periodic_prod
#align multiset.periodic_sum Multiset.periodic_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Finset.periodic_prod [Add α] [CommMonoid β] {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → β}
(s : Finset ι) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Periodic (f i) c) : Periodic (∏ i ∈ s, f i) c :=
s.prod_to_list f ▸ (s.toList.map f).periodic_prod (by simpa [-Periodic] )
#align finset.periodic_prod Finset.periodic_prod
#align finset.periodic_sum Finset.periodic_sum
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Periodic.smul [Add α] [SMul γ β] (h : Periodic f c) (a : γ) :
Periodic (a • f) c := by simp_all
#align function.periodic.smul Function.Periodic.smul
#align function.periodic.vadd Function.Periodic.vadd
protected theorem Periodic.const_smul [AddMonoid α] [Group γ] [DistribMulAction γ α]
(h : Periodic f c) (a : γ) : Periodic (fun x => f (a • x)) (a⁻¹ • c) := fun x => by
simpa only [smul_add, smul_inv_smul] using h (a • x)
#align function.periodic.const_smul Function.Periodic.const_smul
protected theorem Periodic.const_smul₀ [AddCommMonoid α] [DivisionSemiring γ] [Module γ α]
(h : Periodic f c) (a : γ) : Periodic (fun x => f (a • x)) (a⁻¹ • c) := fun x => by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp only [ha, zero_smul]
· simpa only [smul_add, smul_inv_smul₀ ha] using h (a • x)
#align function.periodic.const_smul₀ Function.Periodic.const_smul₀
protected theorem Periodic.const_mul [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (a * x)) (a⁻¹ * c) :=
Periodic.const_smul₀ h a
#align function.periodic.const_mul Function.Periodic.const_mul
theorem Periodic.const_inv_smul [AddMonoid α] [Group γ] [DistribMulAction γ α] (h : Periodic f c)
(a : γ) : Periodic (fun x => f (a⁻¹ • x)) (a • c) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using h.const_smul a⁻¹
#align function.periodic.const_inv_smul Function.Periodic.const_inv_smul
theorem Periodic.const_inv_smul₀ [AddCommMonoid α] [DivisionSemiring γ] [Module γ α]
(h : Periodic f c) (a : γ) : Periodic (fun x => f (a⁻¹ • x)) (a • c) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using h.const_smul₀ a⁻¹
#align function.periodic.const_inv_smul₀ Function.Periodic.const_inv_smul₀
theorem Periodic.const_inv_mul [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (a⁻¹ * x)) (a * c) :=
h.const_inv_smul₀ a
#align function.periodic.const_inv_mul Function.Periodic.const_inv_mul
theorem Periodic.mul_const [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x * a)) (c * a⁻¹) :=
h.const_smul₀ (MulOpposite.op a)
#align function.periodic.mul_const Function.Periodic.mul_const
theorem Periodic.mul_const' [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x * a)) (c / a) := by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using h.mul_const a
#align function.periodic.mul_const' Function.Periodic.mul_const'
theorem Periodic.mul_const_inv [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x * a⁻¹)) (c * a) :=
h.const_inv_smul₀ (MulOpposite.op a)
#align function.periodic.mul_const_inv Function.Periodic.mul_const_inv
theorem Periodic.div_const [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x / a)) (c * a) := by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using h.mul_const_inv a
#align function.periodic.div_const Function.Periodic.div_const
theorem Periodic.add_period [AddSemigroup α] (h1 : Periodic f c₁) (h2 : Periodic f c₂) :
Periodic f (c₁ + c₂) := by simp_all [← add_assoc]
#align function.periodic.add_period Function.Periodic.add_period
theorem Periodic.sub_eq [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (x : α) : f (x - c) = f x := by
simpa only [sub_add_cancel] using (h (x - c)).symm
#align function.periodic.sub_eq Function.Periodic.sub_eq
theorem Periodic.sub_eq' [AddCommGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) : f (c - x) = f (-x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_neg_add] using h (-x)
#align function.periodic.sub_eq' Function.Periodic.sub_eq'
protected theorem Periodic.neg [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) : Periodic f (-c) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, Periodic] using h.sub_eq
#align function.periodic.neg Function.Periodic.neg
theorem Periodic.sub_period [AddGroup α] (h1 : Periodic f c₁) (h2 : Periodic f c₂) :
Periodic f (c₁ - c₂) := fun x => by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_assoc, h2.neg, h1]
#align function.periodic.sub_period Function.Periodic.sub_period
theorem Periodic.const_add [AddSemigroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (a + x)) c := fun x => by simpa [add_assoc] using h (a + x)
#align function.periodic.const_add Function.Periodic.const_add
theorem Periodic.add_const [AddCommSemigroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x + a)) c := fun x => by
simpa only [add_right_comm] using h (x + a)
#align function.periodic.add_const Function.Periodic.add_const
theorem Periodic.const_sub [AddCommGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (a - x)) c := fun x => by
simp only [← sub_sub, h.sub_eq]
#align function.periodic.const_sub Function.Periodic.const_sub
theorem Periodic.sub_const [AddCommGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x - a)) c := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.add_const (-a)
#align function.periodic.sub_const Function.Periodic.sub_const
theorem Periodic.nsmul [AddMonoid α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : Periodic f (n • c) := by
induction n <;> simp_all [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_nsmul, ← add_assoc, zero_nsmul]
#align function.periodic.nsmul Function.Periodic.nsmul
theorem Periodic.nat_mul [Semiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : Periodic f (n * c) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using h.nsmul n
#align function.periodic.nat_mul Function.Periodic.nat_mul
theorem Periodic.neg_nsmul [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : Periodic f (-(n • c)) :=
(h.nsmul n).neg
#align function.periodic.neg_nsmul Function.Periodic.neg_nsmul
theorem Periodic.neg_nat_mul [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : Periodic f (-(n * c)) :=
(h.nat_mul n).neg
#align function.periodic.neg_nat_mul Function.Periodic.neg_nat_mul
theorem Periodic.sub_nsmul_eq [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n • c) = f x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg_nsmul n x
#align function.periodic.sub_nsmul_eq Function.Periodic.sub_nsmul_eq
theorem Periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n * c) = f x := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using h.sub_nsmul_eq n
#align function.periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq Function.Periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq
theorem Periodic.nsmul_sub_eq [AddCommGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) :
f (n • c - x) = f (-x) :=
(h.nsmul n).sub_eq'
#align function.periodic.nsmul_sub_eq Function.Periodic.nsmul_sub_eq
theorem Periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : f (n * c - x) = f (-x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_neg_add] using h.nat_mul n (-x)
#align function.periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq Function.Periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq
protected theorem Periodic.zsmul [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) : Periodic f (n • c) := by
cases' n with n n
· simpa only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, natCast_zsmul] using h.nsmul n
· simpa only [negSucc_zsmul] using (h.nsmul (n + 1)).neg
#align function.periodic.zsmul Function.Periodic.zsmul
protected theorem Periodic.int_mul [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) : Periodic f (n * c) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using h.zsmul n
#align function.periodic.int_mul Function.Periodic.int_mul
theorem Periodic.sub_zsmul_eq [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n • c) = f x :=
(h.zsmul n).sub_eq x
#align function.periodic.sub_zsmul_eq Function.Periodic.sub_zsmul_eq
theorem Periodic.sub_int_mul_eq [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n * c) = f x :=
(h.int_mul n).sub_eq x
#align function.periodic.sub_int_mul_eq Function.Periodic.sub_int_mul_eq
theorem Periodic.zsmul_sub_eq [AddCommGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) :
f (n • c - x) = f (-x) :=
(h.zsmul _).sub_eq'
#align function.periodic.zsmul_sub_eq Function.Periodic.zsmul_sub_eq
theorem Periodic.int_mul_sub_eq [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) : f (n * c - x) = f (-x) :=
(h.int_mul _).sub_eq'
#align function.periodic.int_mul_sub_eq Function.Periodic.int_mul_sub_eq
protected theorem Periodic.eq [AddZeroClass α] (h : Periodic f c) : f c = f 0 := by
simpa only [zero_add] using h 0
#align function.periodic.eq Function.Periodic.eq
protected theorem Periodic.neg_eq [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) : f (-c) = f 0 :=
h.neg.eq
#align function.periodic.neg_eq Function.Periodic.neg_eq
protected theorem Periodic.nsmul_eq [AddMonoid α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : f (n • c) = f 0 :=
(h.nsmul n).eq
#align function.periodic.nsmul_eq Function.Periodic.nsmul_eq
theorem Periodic.nat_mul_eq [Semiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : f (n * c) = f 0 :=
(h.nat_mul n).eq
#align function.periodic.nat_mul_eq Function.Periodic.nat_mul_eq
theorem Periodic.zsmul_eq [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) : f (n • c) = f 0 :=
(h.zsmul n).eq
#align function.periodic.zsmul_eq Function.Periodic.zsmul_eq
theorem Periodic.int_mul_eq [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℤ) : f (n * c) = f 0 :=
(h.int_mul n).eq
#align function.periodic.int_mul_eq Function.Periodic.int_mul_eq
/-- If a function `f` is `Periodic` with positive period `c`, then for all `x` there exists some
`y ∈ Ico 0 c` such that `f x = f y`. -/
theorem Periodic.exists_mem_Ico₀ [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Archimedean α] (h : Periodic f c)
(hc : 0 < c) (x) : ∃ y ∈ Ico 0 c, f x = f y :=
let ⟨n, H, _⟩ := existsUnique_zsmul_near_of_pos' hc x
⟨x - n • c, H, (h.sub_zsmul_eq n).symm⟩
#align function.periodic.exists_mem_Ico₀ Function.Periodic.exists_mem_Ico₀
/-- If a function `f` is `Periodic` with positive period `c`, then for all `x` there exists some
`y ∈ Ico a (a + c)` such that `f x = f y`. -/
theorem Periodic.exists_mem_Ico [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Archimedean α] (h : Periodic f c)
(hc : 0 < c) (x a) : ∃ y ∈ Ico a (a + c), f x = f y :=
let ⟨n, H, _⟩ := existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ico hc x a
⟨x + n • c, H, (h.zsmul n x).symm⟩
#align function.periodic.exists_mem_Ico Function.Periodic.exists_mem_Ico
/-- If a function `f` is `Periodic` with positive period `c`, then for all `x` there exists some
`y ∈ Ioc a (a + c)` such that `f x = f y`. -/
theorem Periodic.exists_mem_Ioc [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Archimedean α] (h : Periodic f c)
(hc : 0 < c) (x a) : ∃ y ∈ Ioc a (a + c), f x = f y :=
let ⟨n, H, _⟩ := existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc hc x a
⟨x + n • c, H, (h.zsmul n x).symm⟩
#align function.periodic.exists_mem_Ioc Function.Periodic.exists_mem_Ioc
theorem Periodic.image_Ioc [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Archimedean α] (h : Periodic f c)
(hc : 0 < c) (a : α) : f '' Ioc a (a + c) = range f :=
(image_subset_range _ _).antisymm <| range_subset_iff.2 fun x =>
let ⟨y, hy, hyx⟩ := h.exists_mem_Ioc hc x a
⟨y, hy, hyx.symm⟩
#align function.periodic.image_Ioc Function.Periodic.image_Ioc
theorem Periodic.image_Icc [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Archimedean α] (h : Periodic f c)
(hc : 0 < c) (a : α) : f '' Icc a (a + c) = range f :=
(image_subset_range _ _).antisymm <| h.image_Ioc hc a ▸ image_subset _ Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Periodic.image_uIcc [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Archimedean α] (h : Periodic f c)
(hc : c ≠ 0) (a : α) : f '' uIcc a (a + c) = range f := by
cases hc.lt_or_lt with
| inl hc =>
rw [uIcc_of_ge (add_le_of_nonpos_right hc.le), ← h.neg.image_Icc (neg_pos.2 hc) (a + c),
add_neg_cancel_right]
| inr hc => rw [uIcc_of_le (le_add_of_nonneg_right hc.le), h.image_Icc hc]
theorem periodic_with_period_zero [AddZeroClass α] (f : α → β) : Periodic f 0 := fun x => by
rw [add_zero]
#align function.periodic_with_period_zero Function.periodic_with_period_zero
theorem Periodic.map_vadd_zmultiples [AddCommGroup α] (hf : Periodic f c)
(a : AddSubgroup.zmultiples c) (x : α) : f (a +ᵥ x) = f x := by
rcases a with ⟨_, m, rfl⟩
simp [AddSubgroup.vadd_def, add_comm _ x, hf.zsmul m x]
#align function.periodic.map_vadd_zmultiples Function.Periodic.map_vadd_zmultiples
theorem Periodic.map_vadd_multiples [AddCommMonoid α] (hf : Periodic f c)
(a : AddSubmonoid.multiples c) (x : α) : f (a +ᵥ x) = f x := by
rcases a with ⟨_, m, rfl⟩
simp [AddSubmonoid.vadd_def, add_comm _ x, hf.nsmul m x]
#align function.periodic.map_vadd_multiples Function.Periodic.map_vadd_multiples
/-- Lift a periodic function to a function from the quotient group. -/
def Periodic.lift [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (x : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples c) : β :=
Quotient.liftOn' x f fun a b h' => by
rw [QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply] at h'
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := h'
exact (h.zsmul k _).symm.trans (congr_arg f (add_eq_of_eq_neg_add hk))
#align function.periodic.lift Function.Periodic.lift
@[simp]
theorem Periodic.lift_coe [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
h.lift (a : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples c) = f a :=
rfl
#align function.periodic.lift_coe Function.Periodic.lift_coe
/-- A periodic function `f : R → X` on a semiring (or, more generally, `AddZeroClass`)
of non-zero period is not injective. -/
lemma Periodic.not_injective {R X : Type*} [AddZeroClass R] {f : R → X} {c : R}
(hf : Periodic f c) (hc : c ≠ 0) : ¬ Injective f := fun h ↦ hc <| h hf.eq
/-! ### Antiperiodicity -/
/-- A function `f` is said to be `antiperiodic` with antiperiod `c` if for all `x`,
`f (x + c) = -f x`. -/
@[simp]
def Antiperiodic [Add α] [Neg β] (f : α → β) (c : α) : Prop :=
∀ x : α, f (x + c) = -f x
#align function.antiperiodic Function.Antiperiodic
protected theorem Antiperiodic.funext [Add α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) :
(fun x => f (x + c)) = -f :=
funext h
#align function.antiperiodic.funext Function.Antiperiodic.funext
protected theorem Antiperiodic.funext' [Add α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) :
(fun x => -f (x + c)) = f :=
neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mpr h.funext
#align function.antiperiodic.funext' Function.Antiperiodic.funext'
/-- If a function is `antiperiodic` with antiperiod `c`, then it is also `Periodic` with period
`2 • c`. -/
protected theorem Antiperiodic.periodic [AddMonoid α] [InvolutiveNeg β]
(h : Antiperiodic f c) : Periodic f (2 • c) := by simp [two_nsmul, ← add_assoc, h _]
/-- If a function is `antiperiodic` with antiperiod `c`, then it is also `Periodic` with period
`2 * c`. -/
protected theorem Antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul [Semiring α] [InvolutiveNeg β]
(h : Antiperiodic f c) : Periodic f (2 * c) := nsmul_eq_mul 2 c ▸ h.periodic
#align function.antiperiodic.periodic Function.Antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
protected theorem Antiperiodic.eq [AddZeroClass α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) : f c = -f 0 := by
simpa only [zero_add] using h 0
#align function.antiperiodic.eq Function.Antiperiodic.eq
theorem Antiperiodic.even_nsmul_periodic [AddMonoid α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℕ) : Periodic f ((2 * n) • c) := mul_nsmul c 2 n ▸ h.periodic.nsmul n
theorem Antiperiodic.nat_even_mul_periodic [Semiring α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℕ) : Periodic f (n * (2 * c)) :=
h.periodic_two_mul.nat_mul n
#align function.antiperiodic.nat_even_mul_periodic Function.Antiperiodic.nat_even_mul_periodic
theorem Antiperiodic.odd_nsmul_antiperiodic [AddMonoid α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℕ) : Antiperiodic f ((2 * n + 1) • c) := fun x => by
rw [add_nsmul, one_nsmul, ← add_assoc, h, h.even_nsmul_periodic]
theorem Antiperiodic.nat_odd_mul_antiperiodic [Semiring α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℕ) : Antiperiodic f (n * (2 * c) + c) := fun x => by
rw [← add_assoc, h, h.nat_even_mul_periodic]
#align function.antiperiodic.nat_odd_mul_antiperiodic Function.Antiperiodic.nat_odd_mul_antiperiodic
theorem Antiperiodic.even_zsmul_periodic [AddGroup α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℤ) : Periodic f ((2 * n) • c) := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_zsmul, two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul]
exact h.periodic.zsmul n
theorem Antiperiodic.int_even_mul_periodic [Ring α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℤ) : Periodic f (n * (2 * c)) :=
h.periodic_two_mul.int_mul n
#align function.antiperiodic.int_even_mul_periodic Function.Antiperiodic.int_even_mul_periodic
theorem Antiperiodic.odd_zsmul_antiperiodic [AddGroup α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℤ) : Antiperiodic f ((2 * n + 1) • c) := by
intro x
rw [add_zsmul, one_zsmul, ← add_assoc, h, h.even_zsmul_periodic]
theorem Antiperiodic.int_odd_mul_antiperiodic [Ring α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(n : ℤ) : Antiperiodic f (n * (2 * c) + c) := fun x => by
rw [← add_assoc, h, h.int_even_mul_periodic]
#align function.antiperiodic.int_odd_mul_antiperiodic Function.Antiperiodic.int_odd_mul_antiperiodic
theorem Antiperiodic.sub_eq [AddGroup α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (x : α) :
f (x - c) = -f x := by simp only [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← h (x - c), sub_add_cancel]
#align function.antiperiodic.sub_eq Function.Antiperiodic.sub_eq
theorem Antiperiodic.sub_eq' [AddCommGroup α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) :
f (c - x) = -f (-x) := by simpa only [sub_eq_neg_add] using h (-x)
#align function.antiperiodic.sub_eq' Function.Antiperiodic.sub_eq'
protected theorem Antiperiodic.neg [AddGroup α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) :
Antiperiodic f (-c) := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, Antiperiodic] using h.sub_eq
#align function.antiperiodic.neg Function.Antiperiodic.neg
theorem Antiperiodic.neg_eq [AddGroup α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) :
f (-c) = -f 0 := by
simpa only [zero_add] using h.neg 0
#align function.antiperiodic.neg_eq Function.Antiperiodic.neg_eq
theorem Antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero [Semiring α] [NegZeroClass β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(hi : f 0 = 0) : ∀ n : ℕ, f (n * c) = 0
| 0 => by rwa [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul]
| n + 1 => by simp [add_mul, h _, Antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero h hi n]
#align function.antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero Function.Antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero
theorem Antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero [Ring α] [SubtractionMonoid β] (h : Antiperiodic f c)
(hi : f 0 = 0) : ∀ n : ℤ, f (n * c) = 0
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [Int.cast_natCast, h.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero hi n]
| .negSucc n => by rw [Int.cast_negSucc, neg_mul, ← mul_neg, h.neg.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero hi]
#align function.antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero Function.Antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero
theorem Antiperiodic.add_zsmul_eq [AddGroup α] [AddGroup β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (n : ℤ) :
f (x + n • c) = (n.negOnePow : ℤ) • f x := by
rcases Int.even_or_odd' n with ⟨k, rfl | rfl⟩
· rw [h.even_zsmul_periodic, Int.negOnePow_two_mul, Units.val_one, one_zsmul]
· rw [h.odd_zsmul_antiperiodic, Int.negOnePow_two_mul_add_one, Units.val_neg,
Units.val_one, neg_zsmul, one_zsmul]
theorem Antiperiodic.sub_zsmul_eq [AddGroup α] [AddGroup β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (n : ℤ) :
f (x - n • c) = (n.negOnePow : ℤ) • f x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_zsmul, Int.negOnePow_neg] using h.add_zsmul_eq (-n)
theorem Antiperiodic.zsmul_sub_eq [AddCommGroup α] [AddGroup β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (n : ℤ) :
f (n • c - x) = (n.negOnePow : ℤ) • f (-x) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm]
exact h.add_zsmul_eq n
theorem Antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq [Ring α] [Ring β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (n : ℤ) :
f (x + n * c) = (n.negOnePow : ℤ) * f x := by simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using h.add_zsmul_eq n
theorem Antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq [Ring α] [Ring β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (n : ℤ) :
f (x - n * c) = (n.negOnePow : ℤ) * f x := by simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using h.sub_zsmul_eq n
theorem Antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq [Ring α] [Ring β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (n : ℤ) :
f (n * c - x) = (n.negOnePow : ℤ) * f (-x) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using h.zsmul_sub_eq n
theorem Antiperiodic.add_nsmul_eq [AddMonoid α] [AddGroup β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (n : ℕ) :
f (x + n • c) = (-1) ^ n • f x := by
rcases Nat.even_or_odd' n with ⟨k, rfl | rfl⟩
· rw [h.even_nsmul_periodic, pow_mul, (by norm_num : (-1) ^ 2 = 1), one_pow, one_zsmul]
· rw [h.odd_nsmul_antiperiodic, pow_add, pow_mul, (by norm_num : (-1) ^ 2 = 1), one_pow,
pow_one, one_mul, neg_zsmul, one_zsmul]
theorem Antiperiodic.sub_nsmul_eq [AddGroup α] [AddGroup β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (n : ℕ) :
f (x - n • c) = (-1) ^ n • f x := by
simpa only [Int.reduceNeg, natCast_zsmul] using h.sub_zsmul_eq n
theorem Antiperiodic.nsmul_sub_eq [AddCommGroup α] [AddGroup β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (n : ℕ) :
f (n • c - x) = (-1) ^ n • f (-x) := by
simpa only [Int.reduceNeg, natCast_zsmul] using h.zsmul_sub_eq n
theorem Antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq [Semiring α] [Ring β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (n : ℕ) :
f (x + n * c) = (-1) ^ n * f x := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, zsmul_eq_mul, Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_neg,
Int.cast_one] using h.add_nsmul_eq n
theorem Antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq [Ring α] [Ring β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (n : ℕ) :
f (x - n * c) = (-1) ^ n * f x := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, zsmul_eq_mul, Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_neg,
Int.cast_one] using h.sub_nsmul_eq n
theorem Antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq [Ring α] [Ring β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (n : ℕ) :
f (n * c - x) = (-1) ^ n * f (-x) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, zsmul_eq_mul, Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_neg,
Int.cast_one] using h.nsmul_sub_eq n
theorem Antiperiodic.const_add [AddSemigroup α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (a : α) :
Antiperiodic (fun x => f (a + x)) c := fun x => by simpa [add_assoc] using h (a + x)
#align function.antiperiodic.const_add Function.Antiperiodic.const_add
theorem Antiperiodic.add_const [AddCommSemigroup α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (a : α) :
Antiperiodic (fun x => f (x + a)) c := fun x => by
simpa only [add_right_comm] using h (x + a)
#align function.antiperiodic.add_const Function.Antiperiodic.add_const
theorem Antiperiodic.const_sub [AddCommGroup α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (a : α) :
Antiperiodic (fun x => f (a - x)) c := fun x => by
simp only [← sub_sub, h.sub_eq]
#align function.antiperiodic.const_sub Function.Antiperiodic.const_sub
theorem Antiperiodic.sub_const [AddCommGroup α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) (a : α) :
Antiperiodic (fun x => f (x - a)) c := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.add_const (-a)
#align function.antiperiodic.sub_const Function.Antiperiodic.sub_const
theorem Antiperiodic.smul [Add α] [Monoid γ] [AddGroup β] [DistribMulAction γ β]
(h : Antiperiodic f c) (a : γ) : Antiperiodic (a • f) c := by simp_all
#align function.antiperiodic.smul Function.Antiperiodic.smul
theorem Antiperiodic.const_smul [AddMonoid α] [Neg β] [Group γ] [DistribMulAction γ α]
(h : Antiperiodic f c) (a : γ) : Antiperiodic (fun x => f (a • x)) (a⁻¹ • c) := fun x => by
simpa only [smul_add, smul_inv_smul] using h (a • x)
#align function.antiperiodic.const_smul Function.Antiperiodic.const_smul
theorem Antiperiodic.const_smul₀ [AddCommMonoid α] [Neg β] [DivisionSemiring γ] [Module γ α]
(h : Antiperiodic f c) {a : γ} (ha : a ≠ 0) : Antiperiodic (fun x => f (a • x)) (a⁻¹ • c) :=
fun x => by simpa only [smul_add, smul_inv_smul₀ ha] using h (a • x)
#align function.antiperiodic.const_smul₀ Function.Antiperiodic.const_smul₀
theorem Antiperiodic.const_mul [DivisionSemiring α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) {a : α}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : Antiperiodic (fun x => f (a * x)) (a⁻¹ * c) :=
h.const_smul₀ ha
#align function.antiperiodic.const_mul Function.Antiperiodic.const_mul
theorem Antiperiodic.const_inv_smul [AddMonoid α] [Neg β] [Group γ] [DistribMulAction γ α]
(h : Antiperiodic f c) (a : γ) : Antiperiodic (fun x => f (a⁻¹ • x)) (a • c) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using h.const_smul a⁻¹
#align function.antiperiodic.const_inv_smul Function.Antiperiodic.const_inv_smul
theorem Antiperiodic.const_inv_smul₀ [AddCommMonoid α] [Neg β] [DivisionSemiring γ] [Module γ α]
(h : Antiperiodic f c) {a : γ} (ha : a ≠ 0) : Antiperiodic (fun x => f (a⁻¹ • x)) (a • c) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using h.const_smul₀ (inv_ne_zero ha)
#align function.antiperiodic.const_inv_smul₀ Function.Antiperiodic.const_inv_smul₀
theorem Antiperiodic.const_inv_mul [DivisionSemiring α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) {a : α}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : Antiperiodic (fun x => f (a⁻¹ * x)) (a * c) :=
h.const_inv_smul₀ ha
#align function.antiperiodic.const_inv_mul Function.Antiperiodic.const_inv_mul
theorem Antiperiodic.mul_const [DivisionSemiring α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) {a : α}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : Antiperiodic (fun x => f (x * a)) (c * a⁻¹) :=
h.const_smul₀ <| (MulOpposite.op_ne_zero_iff a).mpr ha
#align function.antiperiodic.mul_const Function.Antiperiodic.mul_const
theorem Antiperiodic.mul_const' [DivisionSemiring α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) {a : α}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : Antiperiodic (fun x => f (x * a)) (c / a) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using h.mul_const ha
#align function.antiperiodic.mul_const' Function.Antiperiodic.mul_const'
theorem Antiperiodic.mul_const_inv [DivisionSemiring α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) {a : α}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : Antiperiodic (fun x => f (x * a⁻¹)) (c * a) :=
h.const_inv_smul₀ <| (MulOpposite.op_ne_zero_iff a).mpr ha
#align function.antiperiodic.mul_const_inv Function.Antiperiodic.mul_const_inv
theorem Antiperiodic.div_inv [DivisionSemiring α] [Neg β] (h : Antiperiodic f c) {a : α}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : Antiperiodic (fun x => f (x / a)) (c * a) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using h.mul_const_inv ha
#align function.antiperiodic.div_inv Function.Antiperiodic.div_inv
| Mathlib/Algebra/Periodic.lean | 587 | 588 | theorem Antiperiodic.add [AddGroup α] [InvolutiveNeg β] (h1 : Antiperiodic f c₁)
(h2 : Antiperiodic f c₂) : Periodic f (c₁ + c₂) := by | simp_all [← add_assoc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.AbstractFuncEq
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.JacobiTheta.Bounds
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.MellinEqDirichlet
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
/-!
# Odd Hurwitz zeta functions
In this file we study the functions on `ℂ` which are the analytic continuation of the following
series (convergent for `1 < re s`), where `a ∈ ℝ` is a parameter:
`hurwitzZetaOdd a s = 1 / 2 * ∑' n : ℤ, sgn (n + a) / |n + a| ^ s`
and
`sinZeta a s = ∑' n : ℕ, sin (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s`.
The term for `n = -a` in the first sum is understood as 0 if `a` is an integer, as is the term for
`n = 0` in the second sum (for all `a`). Note that these functions are differentiable everywhere,
unlike their even counterparts which have poles.
Of course, we cannot *define* these functions by the above formulae (since existence of the
analytic continuation is not at all obvious); we in fact construct them as Mellin transforms of
various versions of the Jacobi theta function.
## Main definitions and theorems
* `completedHurwitzZetaOdd`: the completed Hurwitz zeta function
* `completedSinZeta`: the completed cosine zeta function
* `differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaOdd` and `differentiable_completedSinZeta`:
differentiability on `ℂ`
* `completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub`: the functional equation
`completedHurwitzZetaOdd a (1 - s) = completedSinZeta a s`
* `hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaOdd` and `hasSum_nat_sinZeta`: relation between
the zeta functions and corresponding Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex hiding abs_of_nonneg
open Filter Topology Asymptotics Real Set MeasureTheory
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace HurwitzZeta
section kernel_defs
/-!
## Definitions and elementary properties of kernels
-/
/-- Variant of `jacobiTheta₂'` which we introduce to simplify some formulae. -/
def jacobiTheta₂'' (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ :=
cexp (π * I * z ^ 2 * τ) * (jacobiTheta₂' (z * τ) τ / (2 * π * I) + z * jacobiTheta₂ (z * τ) τ)
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_conj (z τ : ℂ) :
conj (jacobiTheta₂'' z τ) = jacobiTheta₂'' (conj z) (-conj τ) := by
simp only [jacobiTheta₂'', jacobiTheta₂'_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj,
← exp_conj, conj_ofReal, conj_I, map_mul, map_add, map_div₀, mul_neg, map_pow, map_ofNat,
neg_mul, div_neg, neg_div, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, jacobiTheta₂_neg_left]
/-- Restatement of `jacobiTheta₂'_add_left'`: the function `jacobiTheta₂''` is 1-periodic in `z`. -/
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_add_left (z τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta₂'' (z + 1) τ = jacobiTheta₂'' z τ := by
simp only [jacobiTheta₂'', add_mul z 1, one_mul, jacobiTheta₂'_add_left', jacobiTheta₂_add_left']
generalize jacobiTheta₂ (z * τ) τ = J
generalize jacobiTheta₂' (z * τ) τ = J'
-- clear denominator
simp_rw [div_add' _ _ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← mul_div_assoc]
refine congr_arg (· / (2 * π * I)) ?_
-- get all exponential terms to left
rw [mul_left_comm _ (cexp _), ← mul_add, mul_assoc (cexp _), ← mul_add, ← mul_assoc (cexp _),
← Complex.exp_add]
congrm (cexp ?_ * ?_) <;> ring
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_neg_left (z τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta₂'' (-z) τ = -jacobiTheta₂'' z τ := by
simp only [jacobiTheta₂'', jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, jacobiTheta₂_neg_left,
neg_mul, neg_div, ← neg_add, mul_neg, neg_sq]
lemma jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation' (z τ : ℂ) :
jacobiTheta₂' z τ = (-2 * π) / (-I * τ) ^ (3 / 2 : ℂ) * jacobiTheta₂'' z (-1 / τ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne τ 0 with rfl | hτ
· rw [jacobiTheta₂'_undef _ (by simp), mul_zero, zero_cpow (by norm_num), div_zero, zero_mul]
have aux1 : (-2 * π : ℂ) / (2 * π * I) = I := by
rw [div_eq_iff two_pi_I_ne_zero, mul_comm I, mul_assoc _ I I, I_mul_I, neg_mul, mul_neg,
mul_one]
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation, ← mul_one_div _ τ, mul_right_comm _ (cexp _),
(by rw [cpow_one, ← div_div, div_self (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero)] :
1 / τ = -I / (-I * τ) ^ (1 : ℂ)), div_mul_div_comm,
← cpow_add _ _ (mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero) hτ), ← div_mul_eq_mul_div,
(by norm_num : (1 / 2 + 1 : ℂ) = 3 / 2), mul_assoc (1 / _), mul_assoc (1 / _),
← mul_one_div (-2 * π : ℂ), mul_comm _ (1 / _), mul_assoc (1 / _)]
congr 1
rw [jacobiTheta₂'', div_add' _ _ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← mul_div_assoc, ← mul_div_assoc,
← div_mul_eq_mul_div (-2 * π : ℂ), mul_assoc, aux1, mul_div z (-1), mul_neg_one, neg_div τ z,
jacobiTheta₂_neg_left, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, neg_mul, ← mul_neg, ← mul_neg,
mul_div, mul_neg_one, neg_div, neg_mul, neg_mul, neg_div]
congr 2
rw [neg_sub, ← sub_eq_neg_add, mul_comm _ (_ * I), ← mul_assoc]
/-- Odd Hurwitz zeta kernel (function whose Mellin transform will be the odd part of the completed
Hurwitz zeta function). See `oddKernel_def` for the defining formula, and `hasSum_int_oddKernel`
for an expression as a sum over `ℤ`.
-/
@[irreducible] def oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun a : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * x))) 1 by
intro a; simp only [ofReal_add, ofReal_one, jacobiTheta₂''_add_left]).lift a
lemma oddKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(oddKernel a x) = jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * x) := by
rw [oddKernel, Function.Periodic.lift_coe, ← conj_eq_iff_re, jacobiTheta₂''_conj, map_mul,
conj_I, neg_mul, neg_neg, conj_ofReal, conj_ofReal]
lemma oddKernel_def' (a x : ℝ) : ↑(oddKernel ↑a x) = cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x) *
(jacobiTheta₂' (a * I * x) (I * x) / (2 * π * I) + a * jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x) (I * x)) := by
rw [oddKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'', ← mul_assoc ↑a I x,
(by ring : ↑π * I * ↑a ^ 2 * (I * ↑x) = I ^ 2 * ↑π * ↑a ^ 2 * x), I_sq, neg_one_mul]
lemma oddKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : oddKernel a x = 0 := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' with a'
rw [← ofReal_eq_zero, oddKernel_def', jacobiTheta₂_undef, jacobiTheta₂'_undef, zero_div, zero_add,
mul_zero, mul_zero] <;>
rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re]
/-- Auxiliary function appearing in the functional equation for the odd Hurwitz zeta kernel, equal
to `∑ (n : ℕ), 2 * n * sin (2 * π * n * a) * exp (-π * n ^ 2 * x)`. See `hasSum_nat_sinKernel`
for the defining sum. -/
@[irreducible] def sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun ξ : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂' ξ (I * x) / (-2 * π))) 1 by
intro ξ; simp_rw [ofReal_add, ofReal_one, jacobiTheta₂'_add_left]).lift a
lemma sinKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(sinKernel ↑a x) = jacobiTheta₂' a (I * x) / (-2 * π) := by
rw [sinKernel, Function.Periodic.lift_coe, re_eq_add_conj, map_div₀, jacobiTheta₂'_conj]
simp_rw [map_mul, conj_I, conj_ofReal, map_neg, map_ofNat, neg_mul, neg_neg, half_add_self]
lemma sinKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : sinKernel a x = 0 := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' with a'
rw [← ofReal_eq_zero, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_undef _ (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re]),
zero_div]
lemma oddKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : oddKernel (-a) x = -oddKernel a x := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' with a'
rw [← ofReal_inj, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, oddKernel_def, ofReal_neg, ofReal_neg, oddKernel_def,
jacobiTheta₂''_neg_left]
lemma oddKernel_zero (x : ℝ) : oddKernel 0 x = 0 := by
simpa only [neg_zero, eq_neg_self_iff] using oddKernel_neg 0 x
lemma sinKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) :
sinKernel (-a) x = -sinKernel a x := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' with a'
rw [← ofReal_inj, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, ofReal_neg, sinKernel_def, sinKernel_def, ofReal_neg,
jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, neg_div]
lemma sinKernel_zero (x : ℝ) : sinKernel 0 x = 0 := by
simpa only [neg_zero, eq_neg_self_iff] using sinKernel_neg 0 x
/-- The odd kernel is continuous on `Ioi 0`. -/
lemma continuousOn_oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (oddKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' with a
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ (oddKernel a x : ℂ)) (Ioi 0) from
(continuous_re.comp_continuousOn this).congr fun a _ ↦ (ofReal_re _).symm
simp_rw [oddKernel_def' a]
refine fun x hx ↦ ((Continuous.continuousAt ?_).mul ?_).continuousWithinAt
· fun_prop
· have hf : Continuous fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u) := by fun_prop
apply ContinuousAt.add
· exact ((continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂' (a * I * x) (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).comp
(f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u)) hf.continuousAt).div_const _
· exact continuousAt_const.mul <| (continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x)
(by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).comp (f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u)) hf.continuousAt
lemma continuousOn_sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (sinKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' with a
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ (sinKernel a x : ℂ)) (Ioi 0) from
(continuous_re.comp_continuousOn this).congr fun a _ ↦ (ofReal_re _).symm
simp_rw [sinKernel_def]
apply (ContinuousAt.continuousOn (fun x hx ↦ ?_)).div_const
have h := continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂' a (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])
fun_prop
lemma oddKernel_functional_equation (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) :
oddKernel a x = 1 / x ^ (3 / 2 : ℝ) * sinKernel a (1 / x) := by
-- first reduce to `0 < x`
rcases le_or_lt x 0 with hx | hx
· rw [oddKernel_undef _ hx, sinKernel_undef _ (one_div_nonpos.mpr hx), mul_zero]
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on' with a
have h1 : -1 / (I * ↑(1 / x)) = I * x := by rw [one_div, ofReal_inv, mul_comm, ← div_div,
div_inv_eq_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_I, mul_neg, neg_one_mul, neg_mul, neg_neg, mul_comm]
have h2 : (-I * (I * ↑(1 / x))) = 1 / x := by
rw [← mul_assoc, neg_mul, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul, ofReal_div, ofReal_one]
have h3 : (x : ℂ) ^ (3 / 2 : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Ne, cpow_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, hx.ne', false_and, not_false_eq_true]
have h4 : arg x ≠ π := by rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx.le]; exact pi_ne_zero.symm
rw [← ofReal_inj, oddKernel_def, ofReal_mul, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation',
h1, h2]
generalize jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * ↑x) = J
rw [one_div (x : ℂ), inv_cpow _ _ h4, div_inv_eq_mul, one_div, ofReal_inv, ofReal_cpow hx.le,
ofReal_div, ofReal_ofNat, ofReal_ofNat, ← mul_div_assoc _ _ (-2 * π : ℂ),
eq_div_iff <| mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr two_ne_zero) (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero),
← div_eq_inv_mul, eq_div_iff h3, mul_comm J _, mul_right_comm]
end kernel_defs
section sum_formulas
/-!
## Formulae for the kernels as sums
-/
lemma hasSum_int_oddKernel (a : ℝ) {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ (n + a) * rexp (-π * (n + a) ^ 2 * x)) (oddKernel ↑a x) := by
rw [← hasSum_ofReal, oddKernel_def' a x]
have h1 := hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term (a * I * x) (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])
have h2 := hasSum_jacobiTheta₂'_term (a * I * x) (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])
refine (((h2.div_const (2 * π * I)).add (h1.mul_left ↑a)).mul_left
(cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x))).congr_fun (fun n ↦ ?_)
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_term, mul_assoc (2 * π * I), mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← add_mul,
mul_left_comm, jacobiTheta₂_term, ← Complex.exp_add]
push_cast
simp only [← mul_assoc, ← add_mul]
congrm _ * cexp (?_ * x)
simp only [mul_right_comm _ I, add_mul, mul_assoc _ I, I_mul_I]
ring_nf
lemma hasSum_int_sinKernel (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) : HasSum
(fun n : ℤ ↦ -I * n * cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t)) ↑(sinKernel a t) := by
have h : -2 * (π : ℂ) ≠ (0 : ℂ) := by
simp only [neg_mul, ne_eq, neg_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero,
OfNat.ofNat_ne_zero, ofReal_eq_zero, pi_ne_zero, or_self, not_false_eq_true]
rw [sinKernel_def]
refine ((hasSum_jacobiTheta₂'_term a
(by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).div_const _).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_term, jacobiTheta₂_term, ofReal_exp, mul_assoc (-I * n), ← Complex.exp_add,
eq_div_iff h, ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_pow, ofReal_neg, ofReal_intCast,
mul_comm _ (-2 * π : ℂ), ← mul_assoc]
congrm ?_ * cexp (?_ + ?_)
· simp only [neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, mul_assoc]
· exact mul_right_comm (2 * π * I) a n
· simp only [← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ I, I_mul_I, neg_one_mul]
lemma hasSum_nat_sinKernel (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ 2 * n * Real.sin (2 * π * a * n) * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t))
(sinKernel ↑a t) := by
rw [← hasSum_ofReal]
have := (hasSum_int_sinKernel a ht).nat_add_neg
simp only [Int.cast_zero, sq (0 : ℂ), zero_mul, mul_zero, add_zero] at this
refine this.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
simp_rw [Int.cast_neg, neg_sq, mul_neg, ofReal_mul, Int.cast_natCast, ofReal_natCast,
ofReal_ofNat, ← add_mul, ofReal_sin, Complex.sin]
push_cast
congr 1
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← div_mul_eq_mul_div, ← div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_self two_ne_zero, one_mul,
neg_mul, neg_mul, neg_neg, mul_comm _ I, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ I, neg_mul,
← sub_eq_neg_add, mul_sub]
congr 3 <;> ring
end sum_formulas
section asymp
/-!
## Asymptotics of the kernels as `t → ∞`
-/
/-- The function `oddKernel a` has exponential decay at `+∞`, for any `a`. -/
lemma isBigO_atTop_oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) :
∃ p, 0 < p ∧ IsBigO atTop (oddKernel a) (fun x ↦ Real.exp (-p * x)) := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with b
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := HurwitzKernelBounds.isBigO_atTop_F_int_one b
refine ⟨p, hp, (Eventually.isBigO ?_).trans hp'⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
simpa only [← (hasSum_int_oddKernel b ht).tsum_eq, Real.norm_eq_abs, HurwitzKernelBounds.F_int,
HurwitzKernelBounds.f_int, pow_one, norm_mul, abs_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le] using
norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm (hasSum_int_oddKernel b ht).summable.norm
/-- The function `sinKernel a` has exponential decay at `+∞`, for any `a`. -/
lemma isBigO_atTop_sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) :
∃ p, 0 < p ∧ IsBigO atTop (sinKernel a) (fun x ↦ Real.exp (-p * x)) := by
induction' a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with a
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := HurwitzKernelBounds.isBigO_atTop_F_nat_one (le_refl 0)
refine ⟨p, hp, (Eventually.isBigO ?_).trans (hp'.const_mul_left 2)⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
rw [HurwitzKernelBounds.F_nat, ← (hasSum_nat_sinKernel a ht).tsum_eq]
apply tsum_of_norm_bounded (g := fun n ↦ 2 * HurwitzKernelBounds.f_nat 1 0 t n)
· exact (HurwitzKernelBounds.summable_f_nat 1 0 ht).hasSum.mul_left _
· intro n
rw [norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_two, mul_assoc, mul_assoc,
mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_left two_pos, HurwitzKernelBounds.f_nat, pow_one, add_zero,
norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, Real.norm_eq_abs, Nat.abs_cast, ← mul_assoc,
mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_right (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (Nat.cast_nonneg _) (abs_sin_le_one _)
end asymp
section FEPair
/-!
## Construction of an FE-pair
-/
/-- A `StrongFEPair` structure with `f = oddKernel a` and `g = sinKernel a`. -/
@[simps]
def hurwitzOddFEPair (a : UnitAddCircle) : StrongFEPair ℂ where
f := ofReal' ∘ oddKernel a
g := ofReal' ∘ sinKernel a
hf_int := (continuous_ofReal.comp_continuousOn (continuousOn_oddKernel a)).locallyIntegrableOn
measurableSet_Ioi
hg_int := (continuous_ofReal.comp_continuousOn (continuousOn_sinKernel a)).locallyIntegrableOn
measurableSet_Ioi
k := 3 / 2
hk := by norm_num
hε := one_ne_zero
f₀ := 0
hf₀ := rfl
g₀ := 0
hg₀ := rfl
hf_top r := by
let ⟨v, hv, hv'⟩ := isBigO_atTop_oddKernel a
rw [← isBigO_norm_left] at hv' ⊢
simp_rw [Function.comp_def, sub_zero, norm_real]
exact hv'.trans (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop hv _).isBigO
hg_top r := by
let ⟨v, hv, hv'⟩ := isBigO_atTop_sinKernel a
rw [← isBigO_norm_left] at hv' ⊢
simp_rw [Function.comp_def, sub_zero, norm_real]
exact hv'.trans (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop hv _).isBigO
h_feq x hx := by simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, one_mul, smul_eq_mul, ← ofReal_mul,
oddKernel_functional_equation a, one_div x, one_div x⁻¹, inv_rpow (le_of_lt hx), one_div,
inv_inv]
end FEPair
/-!
## Definition of the completed odd Hurwitz zeta function
-/
/-- The entire function of `s` which agrees with
`1 / 2 * Gamma ((s + 1) / 2) * π ^ (-(s + 1) / 2) * ∑' (n : ℤ), sgn (n + a) / |n + a| ^ s`
for `1 < re s`.
-/
def completedHurwitzZetaOdd (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).Λ ((s + 1) / 2)) / 2
lemma differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaOdd (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (completedHurwitzZetaOdd a) :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).differentiable_Λ.comp
((differentiable_id.add_const 1).div_const 2)).div_const 2
/-- The entire function of `s` which agrees with
` Gamma ((s + 1) / 2) * π ^ (-(s + 1) / 2) * ∑' (n : ℕ), sin (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s`
for `1 < re s`.
-/
def completedSinZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).symm.Λ ((s + 1) / 2)) / 2
lemma differentiable_completedSinZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (completedSinZeta a) :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).symm.differentiable_Λ.comp
((differentiable_id.add_const 1).div_const 2)).div_const 2
/-!
## Parity and functional equations
-/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaOdd_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaOdd (-a) s = -completedHurwitzZetaOdd a s := by
simp only [completedHurwitzZetaOdd, StrongFEPair.Λ, hurwitzOddFEPair, mellin, Function.comp_def,
oddKernel_neg, ofReal_neg, smul_neg]
rw [integral_neg, neg_div]
lemma completedSinZeta_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedSinZeta (-a) s = -completedSinZeta a s := by
simp only [completedSinZeta, StrongFEPair.Λ, mellin, StrongFEPair.symm, WeakFEPair.symm,
hurwitzOddFEPair, Function.comp_def, sinKernel_neg, ofReal_neg, smul_neg]
rw [integral_neg, neg_div]
/-- Functional equation for the odd Hurwitz zeta function. -/
theorem completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaOdd a (1 - s) = completedSinZeta a s := by
rw [completedHurwitzZetaOdd, completedSinZeta,
(by { push_cast; ring } : (1 - s + 1) / 2 = ↑(3 / 2 : ℝ) - (s + 1) / 2),
← hurwitzOddFEPair_k, (hurwitzOddFEPair a).functional_equation ((s + 1) / 2),
hurwitzOddFEPair_ε, one_smul]
/-- Functional equation for the odd Hurwitz zeta function (alternative form). -/
lemma completedSinZeta_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedSinZeta a (1 - s) = completedHurwitzZetaOdd a s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub, sub_sub_cancel]
/-!
## Relation to the Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`
-/
/-- Formula for `completedSinZeta` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range
(first version, with sum over `ℤ`). -/
lemma hasSum_int_completedSinZeta (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ Gammaℝ (s + 1) * (-I) * Int.sign n *
cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) / (↑|n| : ℂ) ^ s / 2) (completedSinZeta a s) := by
let c (n : ℤ) : ℂ := -I * cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) / 2
have hc (n : ℤ) : ‖c n‖ = 1 / 2 := by
simp_rw [c, (by { push_cast; ring } : 2 * π * I * a * n = ↑(2 * π * a * n) * I), norm_div,
RCLike.norm_ofNat, norm_mul, norm_neg, norm_I, one_mul, norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I]
have hF t (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ c n * n * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t)) (sinKernel a t / 2) := by
refine ((hasSum_int_sinKernel a ht).div_const 2).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_right_comm (-I)]
have h_sum : Summable fun i ↦ ‖c i‖ / |↑i| ^ s.re := by
simp_rw [hc, div_right_comm]
apply Summable.div_const
apply Summable.of_nat_of_neg <;>
· simp only [Int.cast_neg, abs_neg, Int.cast_natCast, Nat.abs_cast]
rwa [summable_one_div_nat_rpow]
refine (mellin_div_const .. ▸ hasSum_mellin_pi_mul_sq' (zero_lt_one.trans hs) hF h_sum).congr_fun
fun n ↦ ?_
simp only [Int.sign_eq_sign, SignType.intCast_cast, sign_intCast, ← Int.cast_abs, ofReal_intCast]
ring
/-- Formula for `completedSinZeta` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range
(second version, with sum over `ℕ`). -/
lemma hasSum_nat_completedSinZeta (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ Gammaℝ (s + 1) * Real.sin (2 * π * a * n) / (n : ℂ) ^ s)
(completedSinZeta a s) := by
have := (hasSum_int_completedSinZeta a hs).nat_add_neg
simp_rw [Int.sign_zero, Int.cast_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul, zero_div, add_zero, abs_neg,
Int.sign_neg, Nat.abs_cast, Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_natCast, ← add_div] at this
refine this.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
rw [div_right_comm]
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | h
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, Real.sin_zero, ofReal_zero, zero_div, mul_neg,
Int.sign_zero, Int.cast_zero, Complex.exp_zero, mul_one, neg_zero, add_zero]
simp_rw [Int.sign_natCast_of_ne_zero h, Int.cast_one, ofReal_sin, Complex.sin]
simp only [← mul_div_assoc, push_cast, mul_assoc (Gammaℝ _), ← mul_add]
congr 3
rw [mul_one, mul_neg_one, neg_neg, neg_mul I, ← sub_eq_neg_add, ← mul_sub, mul_comm,
mul_neg, neg_mul]
congr 3 <;> ring
/-- Formula for `completedHurwitzZetaOdd` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range. -/
lemma hasSum_int_completedHurwitzZetaOdd (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ Gammaℝ (s + 1) * SignType.sign (n + a) / (↑|n + a| : ℂ) ^ s / 2)
(completedHurwitzZetaOdd a s) := by
let r (n : ℤ) : ℝ := n + a
let c (n : ℤ) : ℂ := 1 / 2
have hF t (ht : 0 < t) : HasSum (fun n ↦ c n * r n * rexp (-π * (r n) ^ 2 * t))
(oddKernel a t / 2) := by
refine ((hasSum_ofReal.mpr (hasSum_int_oddKernel a ht)).div_const 2).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
simp only [r, c, push_cast, div_mul_eq_mul_div, one_mul]
have h_sum : Summable fun i ↦ ‖c i‖ / |r i| ^ s.re := by
simp_rw [c, ← mul_one_div ‖_‖]
apply Summable.mul_left
rwa [summable_one_div_int_add_rpow]
have := mellin_div_const .. ▸ hasSum_mellin_pi_mul_sq' (zero_lt_one.trans hs) hF h_sum
refine this.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
simp only [c, mul_one_div, div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_right_comm]
/-!
## Non-completed zeta functions
-/
/-- The odd part of the Hurwitz zeta function, i.e. the meromorphic function of `s` which agrees
with `1 / 2 * ∑' (n : ℤ), sign (n + a) / |n + a| ^ s` for `1 < re s`-/
noncomputable def hurwitzZetaOdd (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :=
completedHurwitzZetaOdd a s / Gammaℝ (s + 1)
lemma hurwitzZetaOdd_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
hurwitzZetaOdd (-a) s = -hurwitzZetaOdd a s := by
simp_rw [hurwitzZetaOdd, completedHurwitzZetaOdd_neg, neg_div]
/-- The odd Hurwitz zeta function is differentiable everywhere. -/
lemma differentiable_hurwitzZetaOdd (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (hurwitzZetaOdd a) :=
(differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaOdd a).mul <| differentiable_Gammaℝ_inv.comp <|
differentiable_id.add <| differentiable_const _
/-- The sine zeta function, i.e. the meromorphic function of `s` which agrees
with `∑' (n : ℕ), sin (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s` for `1 < re s`. -/
noncomputable def sinZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :=
completedSinZeta a s / Gammaℝ (s + 1)
lemma sinZeta_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
sinZeta (-a) s = -sinZeta a s := by
simp_rw [sinZeta, completedSinZeta_neg, neg_div]
/-- The sine zeta function is differentiable everywhere. -/
lemma differentiableAt_sinZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (sinZeta a) :=
(differentiable_completedSinZeta a).mul <| differentiable_Gammaℝ_inv.comp <|
differentiable_id.add <| differentiable_const _
/-- Formula for `hurwitzZetaOdd` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range (sum over `ℤ`). -/
theorem hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaOdd (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ SignType.sign (n + a) / (↑|n + a| : ℂ) ^ s / 2) (hurwitzZetaOdd a s) := by
refine ((hasSum_int_completedHurwitzZetaOdd a hs).div_const (Gammaℝ _)).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
have : 0 < re (s + 1) := by rw [add_re, one_re]; positivity
simp only [div_right_comm _ _ (Gammaℝ _), mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (Gammaℝ_ne_zero_of_re_pos this)]
/-- Formula for `hurwitzZetaOdd` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range, with sum over `ℕ`
(version with absolute values) -/
lemma hasSum_nat_hurwitzZetaOdd (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ (SignType.sign (n + a) / (↑|n + a| : ℂ) ^ s
- SignType.sign (n + 1 - a) / (↑|n + 1 - a| : ℂ) ^ s) / 2) (hurwitzZetaOdd a s) := by
refine (hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaOdd a hs).nat_add_neg_add_one.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
rw [Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, sub_div, sub_eq_add_neg, Int.cast_natCast]
have : -(n + 1) + a = -(n + 1 - a) := by { push_cast; ring_nf }
rw [this, Left.sign_neg, abs_neg, SignType.coe_neg, neg_div, neg_div]
/-- Formula for `hurwitzZetaOdd` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range, with sum over `ℕ`
(version without absolute values, assuming `a ∈ Icc 0 1`) -/
lemma hasSum_nat_hurwitzZetaOdd_of_mem_Icc {a : ℝ} (ha : a ∈ Icc 0 1) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ (1 / (n + a : ℂ) ^ s - 1 / (n + 1 - a : ℂ) ^ s) / 2)
(hurwitzZetaOdd a s) := by
refine (hasSum_nat_hurwitzZetaOdd a hs).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
suffices ∀ (b : ℝ) (_ : 0 ≤ b), SignType.sign (n + b) / (↑|n + b| : ℂ) ^ s = 1 / (n + b) ^ s by
simp only [add_sub_assoc, this a ha.1, this (1 - a) (sub_nonneg.mpr ha.2), push_cast]
intro b hb
rw [abs_of_nonneg (by positivity), (by simp : (n : ℂ) + b = ↑(n + b))]
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (by positivity : 0 ≤ n + b) with hb | hb
· rw [sign_pos hb, SignType.coe_one]
· rw [← hb, ofReal_zero, zero_cpow ((not_lt.mpr zero_le_one) ∘ (zero_re ▸ · ▸ hs)),
div_zero, div_zero]
/-- Formula for `sinZeta` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range, with sum over `ℤ`. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/HurwitzZetaOdd.lean | 525 | 531 | theorem hasSum_int_sinZeta (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ -I * n.sign * cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) / ↑|n| ^ s / 2) (sinZeta a s) := by |
rw [sinZeta]
refine ((hasSum_int_completedSinZeta a hs).div_const (Gammaℝ (s + 1))).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
have : 0 < re (s + 1) := by rw [add_re, one_re]; positivity
simp only [mul_assoc, div_right_comm _ _ (Gammaℝ _),
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (Gammaℝ_ne_zero_of_re_pos this)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.TotallyDisconnected
import Mathlib.Topology.Inseparable
#align_import topology.separation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d91e7f7a7f1c7e9f0e18fdb6bde4f652004c735d"
/-!
# Separation properties of topological spaces.
This file defines the predicate `SeparatedNhds`, and common separation axioms
(under the Kolmogorov classification).
## Main definitions
* `SeparatedNhds`: Two `Set`s are separated by neighbourhoods if they are contained in disjoint
open sets.
* `T0Space`: A T₀/Kolmogorov space is a space where, for every two points `x ≠ y`,
there is an open set that contains one, but not the other.
* `R0Space`: An R₀ space (sometimes called a *symmetric space*) is a topological space
such that the `Specializes` relation is symmetric.
* `T1Space`: A T₁/Fréchet space is a space where every singleton set is closed.
This is equivalent to, for every pair `x ≠ y`, there existing an open set containing `x`
but not `y` (`t1Space_iff_exists_open` shows that these conditions are equivalent.)
T₁ implies T₀ and R₀.
* `R1Space`: An R₁/preregular space is a space where any two topologically distinguishable points
have disjoint neighbourhoods. R₁ implies R₀.
* `T2Space`: A T₂/Hausdorff space is a space where, for every two points `x ≠ y`,
there is two disjoint open sets, one containing `x`, and the other `y`. T₂ implies T₁ and R₁.
* `T25Space`: A T₂.₅/Urysohn space is a space where, for every two points `x ≠ y`,
there is two open sets, one containing `x`, and the other `y`, whose closures are disjoint.
T₂.₅ implies T₂.
* `RegularSpace`: A regular space is one where, given any closed `C` and `x ∉ C`,
there are disjoint open sets containing `x` and `C` respectively. Such a space is not necessarily
Hausdorff.
* `T3Space`: A T₃ space is a regular T₀ space. T₃ implies T₂.₅.
* `NormalSpace`: A normal space, is one where given two disjoint closed sets,
we can find two open sets that separate them. Such a space is not necessarily Hausdorff, even if
it is T₀.
* `T4Space`: A T₄ space is a normal T₁ space. T₄ implies T₃.
* `CompletelyNormalSpace`: A completely normal space is one in which for any two sets `s`, `t`
such that if both `closure s` is disjoint with `t`, and `s` is disjoint with `closure t`,
then there exist disjoint neighbourhoods of `s` and `t`. `Embedding.completelyNormalSpace` allows
us to conclude that this is equivalent to all subspaces being normal. Such a space is not
necessarily Hausdorff or regular, even if it is T₀.
* `T5Space`: A T₅ space is a completely normal T₁ space. T₅ implies T₄.
Note that `mathlib` adopts the modern convention that `m ≤ n` if and only if `T_m → T_n`, but
occasionally the literature swaps definitions for e.g. T₃ and regular.
## Main results
### T₀ spaces
* `IsClosed.exists_closed_singleton`: Given a closed set `S` in a compact T₀ space,
there is some `x ∈ S` such that `{x}` is closed.
* `exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite`: Given an open finite set `S` in a T₀ space,
there is some `x ∈ S` such that `{x}` is open.
### T₁ spaces
* `isClosedMap_const`: The constant map is a closed map.
* `discrete_of_t1_of_finite`: A finite T₁ space must have the discrete topology.
### T₂ spaces
* `t2_iff_nhds`: A space is T₂ iff the neighbourhoods of distinct points generate the bottom filter.
* `t2_iff_isClosed_diagonal`: A space is T₂ iff the `diagonal` of `X` (that is, the set of all
points of the form `(a, a) : X × X`) is closed under the product topology.
* `separatedNhds_of_finset_finset`: Any two disjoint finsets are `SeparatedNhds`.
* Most topological constructions preserve Hausdorffness;
these results are part of the typeclass inference system (e.g. `Embedding.t2Space`)
* `Set.EqOn.closure`: If two functions are equal on some set `s`, they are equal on its closure.
* `IsCompact.isClosed`: All compact sets are closed.
* `WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace.locallyCompactSpace`: If a topological space is both
weakly locally compact (i.e., each point has a compact neighbourhood)
and is T₂, then it is locally compact.
* `totallySeparatedSpace_of_t1_of_basis_clopen`: If `X` has a clopen basis, then
it is a `TotallySeparatedSpace`.
* `loc_compact_t2_tot_disc_iff_tot_sep`: A locally compact T₂ space is totally disconnected iff
it is totally separated.
* `t2Quotient`: the largest T2 quotient of a given topological space.
If the space is also compact:
* `normalOfCompactT2`: A compact T₂ space is a `NormalSpace`.
* `connectedComponent_eq_iInter_isClopen`: The connected component of a point
is the intersection of all its clopen neighbourhoods.
* `compact_t2_tot_disc_iff_tot_sep`: Being a `TotallyDisconnectedSpace`
is equivalent to being a `TotallySeparatedSpace`.
* `ConnectedComponents.t2`: `ConnectedComponents X` is T₂ for `X` T₂ and compact.
### T₃ spaces
* `disjoint_nested_nhds`: Given two points `x ≠ y`, we can find neighbourhoods `x ∈ V₁ ⊆ U₁` and
`y ∈ V₂ ⊆ U₂`, with the `Vₖ` closed and the `Uₖ` open, such that the `Uₖ` are disjoint.
## References
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_axiom
-/
open Function Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
open scoped Classical
universe u v
variable {X : Type*} {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
section Separation
/--
`SeparatedNhds` is a predicate on pairs of sub`Set`s of a topological space. It holds if the two
sub`Set`s are contained in disjoint open sets.
-/
def SeparatedNhds : Set X → Set X → Prop := fun s t : Set X =>
∃ U V : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ IsOpen V ∧ s ⊆ U ∧ t ⊆ V ∧ Disjoint U V
#align separated_nhds SeparatedNhds
theorem separatedNhds_iff_disjoint {s t : Set X} : SeparatedNhds s t ↔ Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓝ˢ t) := by
simp only [(hasBasis_nhdsSet s).disjoint_iff (hasBasis_nhdsSet t), SeparatedNhds, exists_prop, ←
exists_and_left, and_assoc, and_comm, and_left_comm]
#align separated_nhds_iff_disjoint separatedNhds_iff_disjoint
alias ⟨SeparatedNhds.disjoint_nhdsSet, _⟩ := separatedNhds_iff_disjoint
namespace SeparatedNhds
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Set X}
@[symm]
theorem symm : SeparatedNhds s t → SeparatedNhds t s := fun ⟨U, V, oU, oV, aU, bV, UV⟩ =>
⟨V, U, oV, oU, bV, aU, Disjoint.symm UV⟩
#align separated_nhds.symm SeparatedNhds.symm
theorem comm (s t : Set X) : SeparatedNhds s t ↔ SeparatedNhds t s :=
⟨symm, symm⟩
#align separated_nhds.comm SeparatedNhds.comm
theorem preimage [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y} {s t : Set Y} (h : SeparatedNhds s t)
(hf : Continuous f) : SeparatedNhds (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
let ⟨U, V, oU, oV, sU, tV, UV⟩ := h
⟨f ⁻¹' U, f ⁻¹' V, oU.preimage hf, oV.preimage hf, preimage_mono sU, preimage_mono tV,
UV.preimage f⟩
#align separated_nhds.preimage SeparatedNhds.preimage
protected theorem disjoint (h : SeparatedNhds s t) : Disjoint s t :=
let ⟨_, _, _, _, hsU, htV, hd⟩ := h; hd.mono hsU htV
#align separated_nhds.disjoint SeparatedNhds.disjoint
theorem disjoint_closure_left (h : SeparatedNhds s t) : Disjoint (closure s) t :=
let ⟨_U, _V, _, hV, hsU, htV, hd⟩ := h
(hd.closure_left hV).mono (closure_mono hsU) htV
#align separated_nhds.disjoint_closure_left SeparatedNhds.disjoint_closure_left
theorem disjoint_closure_right (h : SeparatedNhds s t) : Disjoint s (closure t) :=
h.symm.disjoint_closure_left.symm
#align separated_nhds.disjoint_closure_right SeparatedNhds.disjoint_closure_right
@[simp] theorem empty_right (s : Set X) : SeparatedNhds s ∅ :=
⟨_, _, isOpen_univ, isOpen_empty, fun a _ => mem_univ a, Subset.rfl, disjoint_empty _⟩
#align separated_nhds.empty_right SeparatedNhds.empty_right
@[simp] theorem empty_left (s : Set X) : SeparatedNhds ∅ s :=
(empty_right _).symm
#align separated_nhds.empty_left SeparatedNhds.empty_left
theorem mono (h : SeparatedNhds s₂ t₂) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : SeparatedNhds s₁ t₁ :=
let ⟨U, V, hU, hV, hsU, htV, hd⟩ := h
⟨U, V, hU, hV, hs.trans hsU, ht.trans htV, hd⟩
#align separated_nhds.mono SeparatedNhds.mono
theorem union_left : SeparatedNhds s u → SeparatedNhds t u → SeparatedNhds (s ∪ t) u := by
simpa only [separatedNhds_iff_disjoint, nhdsSet_union, disjoint_sup_left] using And.intro
#align separated_nhds.union_left SeparatedNhds.union_left
theorem union_right (ht : SeparatedNhds s t) (hu : SeparatedNhds s u) : SeparatedNhds s (t ∪ u) :=
(ht.symm.union_left hu.symm).symm
#align separated_nhds.union_right SeparatedNhds.union_right
end SeparatedNhds
/-- A T₀ space, also known as a Kolmogorov space, is a topological space such that for every pair
`x ≠ y`, there is an open set containing one but not the other. We formulate the definition in terms
of the `Inseparable` relation. -/
class T0Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- Two inseparable points in a T₀ space are equal. -/
t0 : ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, Inseparable x y → x = y
#align t0_space T0Space
theorem t0Space_iff_inseparable (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ ∀ x y : X, Inseparable x y → x = y :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align t0_space_iff_inseparable t0Space_iff_inseparable
theorem t0Space_iff_not_inseparable (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y : X => ¬Inseparable x y := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_inseparable, Ne, not_imp_not, Pairwise]
#align t0_space_iff_not_inseparable t0Space_iff_not_inseparable
theorem Inseparable.eq [T0Space X] {x y : X} (h : Inseparable x y) : x = y :=
T0Space.t0 h
#align inseparable.eq Inseparable.eq
/-- A topology `Inducing` map from a T₀ space is injective. -/
protected theorem Inducing.injective [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Inducing f) : Injective f := fun _ _ h =>
(hf.inseparable_iff.1 <| .of_eq h).eq
#align inducing.injective Inducing.injective
/-- A topology `Inducing` map from a T₀ space is a topological embedding. -/
protected theorem Inducing.embedding [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Inducing f) : Embedding f :=
⟨hf, hf.injective⟩
#align inducing.embedding Inducing.embedding
lemma embedding_iff_inducing [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y} :
Embedding f ↔ Inducing f :=
⟨Embedding.toInducing, Inducing.embedding⟩
#align embedding_iff_inducing embedding_iff_inducing
theorem t0Space_iff_nhds_injective (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Injective (𝓝 : X → Filter X) :=
t0Space_iff_inseparable X
#align t0_space_iff_nhds_injective t0Space_iff_nhds_injective
theorem nhds_injective [T0Space X] : Injective (𝓝 : X → Filter X) :=
(t0Space_iff_nhds_injective X).1 ‹_›
#align nhds_injective nhds_injective
theorem inseparable_iff_eq [T0Space X] {x y : X} : Inseparable x y ↔ x = y :=
nhds_injective.eq_iff
#align inseparable_iff_eq inseparable_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem nhds_eq_nhds_iff [T0Space X] {a b : X} : 𝓝 a = 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
nhds_injective.eq_iff
#align nhds_eq_nhds_iff nhds_eq_nhds_iff
@[simp]
theorem inseparable_eq_eq [T0Space X] : Inseparable = @Eq X :=
funext₂ fun _ _ => propext inseparable_iff_eq
#align inseparable_eq_eq inseparable_eq_eq
theorem TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.inseparable_iff {b : Set (Set X)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {x y : X} : Inseparable x y ↔ ∀ s ∈ b, (x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) :=
⟨fun h s hs ↦ inseparable_iff_forall_open.1 h _ (hb.isOpen hs),
fun h ↦ hb.nhds_hasBasis.eq_of_same_basis <| by
convert hb.nhds_hasBasis using 2
exact and_congr_right (h _)⟩
theorem TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.eq_iff [T0Space X] {b : Set (Set X)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {x y : X} : x = y ↔ ∀ s ∈ b, (x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) :=
inseparable_iff_eq.symm.trans hb.inseparable_iff
theorem t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y => ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ Xor' (x ∈ U) (y ∈ U) := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_not_inseparable, xor_iff_not_iff, not_forall, exists_prop,
inseparable_iff_forall_open, Pairwise]
#align t0_space_iff_exists_is_open_xor_mem t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem
theorem exists_isOpen_xor'_mem [T0Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ Xor' (x ∈ U) (y ∈ U) :=
(t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem X).1 ‹_› h
#align exists_is_open_xor_mem exists_isOpen_xor'_mem
/-- Specialization forms a partial order on a t0 topological space. -/
def specializationOrder (X) [TopologicalSpace X] [T0Space X] : PartialOrder X :=
{ specializationPreorder X, PartialOrder.lift (OrderDual.toDual ∘ 𝓝) nhds_injective with }
#align specialization_order specializationOrder
instance SeparationQuotient.instT0Space : T0Space (SeparationQuotient X) :=
⟨fun x y => Quotient.inductionOn₂' x y fun _ _ h =>
SeparationQuotient.mk_eq_mk.2 <| SeparationQuotient.inducing_mk.inseparable_iff.1 h⟩
theorem minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsClosed t → t = s) : s.Subsingleton := by
clear Y -- Porting note: added
refine fun x hx y hy => of_not_not fun hxy => ?_
rcases exists_isOpen_xor'_mem hxy with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
wlog h : x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U
· refine this hs hmin y hy x hx (Ne.symm hxy) U hUo hU.symm (hU.resolve_left h)
cases' h with hxU hyU
have : s \ U = s := hmin (s \ U) diff_subset ⟨y, hy, hyU⟩ (hs.sdiff hUo)
exact (this.symm.subset hx).2 hxU
#align minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton
theorem minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsClosed t → t = s) : ∃ x, s = {x} :=
exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.2
⟨hne, minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton hs hmin⟩
#align minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton
/-- Given a closed set `S` in a compact T₀ space, there is some `x ∈ S` such that `{x}` is
closed. -/
theorem IsClosed.exists_closed_singleton [T0Space X] [CompactSpace X] {S : Set X}
(hS : IsClosed S) (hne : S.Nonempty) : ∃ x : X, x ∈ S ∧ IsClosed ({x} : Set X) := by
obtain ⟨V, Vsub, Vne, Vcls, hV⟩ := hS.exists_minimal_nonempty_closed_subset hne
rcases minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton Vcls Vne hV with ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, Vsub (mem_singleton x), Vcls⟩
#align is_closed.exists_closed_singleton IsClosed.exists_closed_singleton
theorem minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsOpen t → t = s) : s.Subsingleton := by
clear Y -- Porting note: added
refine fun x hx y hy => of_not_not fun hxy => ?_
rcases exists_isOpen_xor'_mem hxy with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
wlog h : x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U
· exact this hs hmin y hy x hx (Ne.symm hxy) U hUo hU.symm (hU.resolve_left h)
cases' h with hxU hyU
have : s ∩ U = s := hmin (s ∩ U) inter_subset_left ⟨x, hx, hxU⟩ (hs.inter hUo)
exact hyU (this.symm.subset hy).2
#align minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton
theorem minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsOpen t → t = s) : ∃ x, s = {x} :=
exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.2 ⟨hne, minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton hs hmin⟩
#align minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton
/-- Given an open finite set `S` in a T₀ space, there is some `x ∈ S` such that `{x}` is open. -/
theorem exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hfin : s.Finite)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (ho : IsOpen s) : ∃ x ∈ s, IsOpen ({x} : Set X) := by
lift s to Finset X using hfin
induction' s using Finset.strongInductionOn with s ihs
rcases em (∃ t, t ⊂ s ∧ t.Nonempty ∧ IsOpen (t : Set X)) with (⟨t, hts, htne, hto⟩ | ht)
· rcases ihs t hts htne hto with ⟨x, hxt, hxo⟩
exact ⟨x, hts.1 hxt, hxo⟩
· -- Porting note: was `rcases minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton ho hne _ with ⟨x, hx⟩`
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/116
rsuffices ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, s.toSet = {x}
· exact ⟨x, hx.symm ▸ rfl, hx ▸ ho⟩
refine minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton ho hne ?_
refine fun t hts htne hto => of_not_not fun hts' => ht ?_
lift t to Finset X using s.finite_toSet.subset hts
exact ⟨t, ssubset_iff_subset_ne.2 ⟨hts, mt Finset.coe_inj.2 hts'⟩, htne, hto⟩
#align exists_open_singleton_of_open_finite exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite
theorem exists_open_singleton_of_finite [T0Space X] [Finite X] [Nonempty X] :
∃ x : X, IsOpen ({x} : Set X) :=
let ⟨x, _, h⟩ := exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite (Set.toFinite _)
univ_nonempty isOpen_univ
⟨x, h⟩
#align exists_open_singleton_of_fintype exists_open_singleton_of_finite
theorem t0Space_of_injective_of_continuous [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (hf' : Continuous f) [T0Space Y] : T0Space X :=
⟨fun _ _ h => hf <| (h.map hf').eq⟩
#align t0_space_of_injective_of_continuous t0Space_of_injective_of_continuous
protected theorem Embedding.t0Space [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Embedding f) : T0Space X :=
t0Space_of_injective_of_continuous hf.inj hf.continuous
#align embedding.t0_space Embedding.t0Space
instance Subtype.t0Space [T0Space X] {p : X → Prop} : T0Space (Subtype p) :=
embedding_subtype_val.t0Space
#align subtype.t0_space Subtype.t0Space
theorem t0Space_iff_or_not_mem_closure (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun a b : X => a ∉ closure ({b} : Set X) ∨ b ∉ closure ({a} : Set X) := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_not_inseparable, inseparable_iff_mem_closure, not_and_or]
#align t0_space_iff_or_not_mem_closure t0Space_iff_or_not_mem_closure
instance Prod.instT0Space [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] [T0Space Y] : T0Space (X × Y) :=
⟨fun _ _ h => Prod.ext (h.map continuous_fst).eq (h.map continuous_snd).eq⟩
instance Pi.instT0Space {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
[∀ i, T0Space (X i)] :
T0Space (∀ i, X i) :=
⟨fun _ _ h => funext fun i => (h.map (continuous_apply i)).eq⟩
#align pi.t0_space Pi.instT0Space
instance ULift.instT0Space [T0Space X] : T0Space (ULift X) :=
embedding_uLift_down.t0Space
theorem T0Space.of_cover (h : ∀ x y, Inseparable x y → ∃ s : Set X, x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ s ∧ T0Space s) :
T0Space X := by
refine ⟨fun x y hxy => ?_⟩
rcases h x y hxy with ⟨s, hxs, hys, hs⟩
lift x to s using hxs; lift y to s using hys
rw [← subtype_inseparable_iff] at hxy
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hxy.eq
#align t0_space.of_cover T0Space.of_cover
theorem T0Space.of_open_cover (h : ∀ x, ∃ s : Set X, x ∈ s ∧ IsOpen s ∧ T0Space s) : T0Space X :=
T0Space.of_cover fun x _ hxy =>
let ⟨s, hxs, hso, hs⟩ := h x
⟨s, hxs, (hxy.mem_open_iff hso).1 hxs, hs⟩
#align t0_space.of_open_cover T0Space.of_open_cover
/-- A topological space is called an R₀ space, if `Specializes` relation is symmetric.
In other words, given two points `x y : X`,
if every neighborhood of `y` contains `x`, then every neighborhood of `x` contains `y`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class R0Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- In an R₀ space, the `Specializes` relation is symmetric. -/
specializes_symmetric : Symmetric (Specializes : X → X → Prop)
export R0Space (specializes_symmetric)
section R0Space
variable [R0Space X] {x y : X}
/-- In an R₀ space, the `Specializes` relation is symmetric, dot notation version. -/
theorem Specializes.symm (h : x ⤳ y) : y ⤳ x := specializes_symmetric h
#align specializes.symm Specializes.symm
/-- In an R₀ space, the `Specializes` relation is symmetric, `Iff` version. -/
theorem specializes_comm : x ⤳ y ↔ y ⤳ x := ⟨Specializes.symm, Specializes.symm⟩
#align specializes_comm specializes_comm
/-- In an R₀ space, `Specializes` is equivalent to `Inseparable`. -/
theorem specializes_iff_inseparable : x ⤳ y ↔ Inseparable x y :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.antisymm h.symm, Inseparable.specializes⟩
#align specializes_iff_inseparable specializes_iff_inseparable
/-- In an R₀ space, `Specializes` implies `Inseparable`. -/
alias ⟨Specializes.inseparable, _⟩ := specializes_iff_inseparable
theorem Inducing.r0Space [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → X} (hf : Inducing f) : R0Space Y where
specializes_symmetric a b := by
simpa only [← hf.specializes_iff] using Specializes.symm
instance {p : X → Prop} : R0Space {x // p x} := inducing_subtype_val.r0Space
instance [TopologicalSpace Y] [R0Space Y] : R0Space (X × Y) where
specializes_symmetric _ _ h := h.fst.symm.prod h.snd.symm
instance {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, R0Space (X i)] :
R0Space (∀ i, X i) where
specializes_symmetric _ _ h := specializes_pi.2 fun i ↦ (specializes_pi.1 h i).symm
/-- In an R₀ space, the closure of a singleton is a compact set. -/
theorem isCompact_closure_singleton : IsCompact (closure {x}) := by
refine isCompact_of_finite_subcover fun U hUo hxU ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, x ∈ U i := mem_iUnion.1 <| hxU <| subset_closure rfl
refine ⟨{i}, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← specializes_iff_mem_closure, specializes_comm] at hy
simpa using hy.mem_open (hUo i) hi
theorem Filter.coclosedCompact_le_cofinite : coclosedCompact X ≤ cofinite :=
le_cofinite_iff_compl_singleton_mem.2 fun _ ↦
compl_mem_coclosedCompact.2 isCompact_closure_singleton
#align filter.coclosed_compact_le_cofinite Filter.coclosedCompact_le_cofinite
variable (X)
/-- In an R₀ space, relatively compact sets form a bornology.
Its cobounded filter is `Filter.coclosedCompact`.
See also `Bornology.inCompact` the bornology of sets contained in a compact set. -/
def Bornology.relativelyCompact : Bornology X where
cobounded' := Filter.coclosedCompact X
le_cofinite' := Filter.coclosedCompact_le_cofinite
#align bornology.relatively_compact Bornology.relativelyCompact
variable {X}
theorem Bornology.relativelyCompact.isBounded_iff {s : Set X} :
@Bornology.IsBounded _ (Bornology.relativelyCompact X) s ↔ IsCompact (closure s) :=
compl_mem_coclosedCompact
#align bornology.relatively_compact.is_bounded_iff Bornology.relativelyCompact.isBounded_iff
/-- In an R₀ space, the closure of a finite set is a compact set. -/
theorem Set.Finite.isCompact_closure {s : Set X} (hs : s.Finite) : IsCompact (closure s) :=
let _ : Bornology X := .relativelyCompact X
Bornology.relativelyCompact.isBounded_iff.1 hs.isBounded
end R0Space
/-- A T₁ space, also known as a Fréchet space, is a topological space
where every singleton set is closed. Equivalently, for every pair
`x ≠ y`, there is an open set containing `x` and not `y`. -/
class T1Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- A singleton in a T₁ space is a closed set. -/
t1 : ∀ x, IsClosed ({x} : Set X)
#align t1_space T1Space
theorem isClosed_singleton [T1Space X] {x : X} : IsClosed ({x} : Set X) :=
T1Space.t1 x
#align is_closed_singleton isClosed_singleton
theorem isOpen_compl_singleton [T1Space X] {x : X} : IsOpen ({x}ᶜ : Set X) :=
isClosed_singleton.isOpen_compl
#align is_open_compl_singleton isOpen_compl_singleton
theorem isOpen_ne [T1Space X] {x : X} : IsOpen { y | y ≠ x } :=
isOpen_compl_singleton
#align is_open_ne isOpen_ne
@[to_additive]
theorem Continuous.isOpen_mulSupport [T1Space X] [One X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → X}
(hf : Continuous f) : IsOpen (mulSupport f) :=
isOpen_ne.preimage hf
#align continuous.is_open_mul_support Continuous.isOpen_mulSupport
#align continuous.is_open_support Continuous.isOpen_support
theorem Ne.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : 𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x = 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ne.nhdsWithin_eq h
#align ne.nhds_within_compl_singleton Ne.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton
theorem Ne.nhdsWithin_diff_singleton [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) (s : Set X) :
𝓝[s \ {y}] x = 𝓝[s] x := by
rw [diff_eq, inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem]
exact mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (isOpen_ne.mem_nhds h)
#align ne.nhds_within_diff_singleton Ne.nhdsWithin_diff_singleton
lemma nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_le [T1Space X] (x y : X) : 𝓝[{x}ᶜ] x ≤ 𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with rfl|hy
· exact Eq.le rfl
· rw [Ne.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton hy]
exact nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem isOpen_setOf_eventually_nhdsWithin [T1Space X] {p : X → Prop} :
IsOpen { x | ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[≠] x, p y } := by
refine isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.mpr fun a ha => ?_
filter_upwards [eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.mpr ha] with b hb
rcases eq_or_ne a b with rfl | h
· exact hb
· rw [h.symm.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton] at hb
exact hb.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds
#align is_open_set_of_eventually_nhds_within isOpen_setOf_eventually_nhdsWithin
protected theorem Set.Finite.isClosed [T1Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : Set.Finite s) : IsClosed s := by
rw [← biUnion_of_singleton s]
exact hs.isClosed_biUnion fun i _ => isClosed_singleton
#align set.finite.is_closed Set.Finite.isClosed
theorem TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.exists_mem_of_ne [T1Space X] {b : Set (Set X)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ a ∈ b, x ∈ a ∧ y ∉ a := by
rcases hb.isOpen_iff.1 isOpen_ne x h with ⟨a, ab, xa, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, ab, xa, fun h => ha h rfl⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.exists_mem_of_ne TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.exists_mem_of_ne
protected theorem Finset.isClosed [T1Space X] (s : Finset X) : IsClosed (s : Set X) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed
#align finset.is_closed Finset.isClosed
theorem t1Space_TFAE (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
List.TFAE [T1Space X,
∀ x, IsClosed ({ x } : Set X),
∀ x, IsOpen ({ x }ᶜ : Set X),
Continuous (@CofiniteTopology.of X),
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → {y}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x,
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, y ∉ s,
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U,
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (𝓝 x) (pure y),
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (pure x) (𝓝 y),
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ⤳ y → x = y] := by
tfae_have 1 ↔ 2
· exact ⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
tfae_have 2 ↔ 3
· simp only [isOpen_compl_iff]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 3
· refine forall_swap.trans ?_
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 6
· simp only [← subset_compl_singleton_iff, exists_mem_subset_iff]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 7
· simp only [(nhds_basis_opens _).mem_iff, subset_compl_singleton_iff, exists_prop, and_assoc,
and_left_comm]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 8
· simp only [← principal_singleton, disjoint_principal_right]
tfae_have 8 ↔ 9
· exact forall_swap.trans (by simp only [disjoint_comm, ne_comm])
tfae_have 1 → 4
· simp only [continuous_def, CofiniteTopology.isOpen_iff']
rintro H s (rfl | hs)
exacts [isOpen_empty, compl_compl s ▸ (@Set.Finite.isClosed _ _ H _ hs).isOpen_compl]
tfae_have 4 → 2
· exact fun h x => (CofiniteTopology.isClosed_iff.2 <| Or.inr (finite_singleton _)).preimage h
tfae_have 2 ↔ 10
· simp only [← closure_subset_iff_isClosed, specializes_iff_mem_closure, subset_def,
mem_singleton_iff, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
#align t1_space_tfae t1Space_TFAE
theorem t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of : T1Space X ↔ Continuous (@CofiniteTopology.of X) :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 3
#align t1_space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of
theorem CofiniteTopology.continuous_of [T1Space X] : Continuous (@CofiniteTopology.of X) :=
t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of.mp ‹_›
#align cofinite_topology.continuous_of CofiniteTopology.continuous_of
theorem t1Space_iff_exists_open :
T1Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y => ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 6
#align t1_space_iff_exists_open t1Space_iff_exists_open
theorem t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds : T1Space X ↔ ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (pure x) (𝓝 y) :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 8
#align t1_space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds
theorem t1Space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure : T1Space X ↔ ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (𝓝 x) (pure y) :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 7
#align t1_space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure t1Space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure
theorem t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq : T1Space X ↔ ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ⤳ y → x = y :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 9
#align t1_space_iff_specializes_imp_eq t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq
theorem disjoint_pure_nhds [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : Disjoint (pure x) (𝓝 y) :=
t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds.mp ‹_› h
#align disjoint_pure_nhds disjoint_pure_nhds
theorem disjoint_nhds_pure [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (pure y) :=
t1Space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure.mp ‹_› h
#align disjoint_nhds_pure disjoint_nhds_pure
theorem Specializes.eq [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ⤳ y) : x = y :=
t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq.1 ‹_› h
#align specializes.eq Specializes.eq
theorem specializes_iff_eq [T1Space X] {x y : X} : x ⤳ y ↔ x = y :=
⟨Specializes.eq, fun h => h ▸ specializes_rfl⟩
#align specializes_iff_eq specializes_iff_eq
@[simp] theorem specializes_eq_eq [T1Space X] : (· ⤳ ·) = @Eq X :=
funext₂ fun _ _ => propext specializes_iff_eq
#align specializes_eq_eq specializes_eq_eq
@[simp]
theorem pure_le_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {a b : X} : pure a ≤ 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
specializes_iff_pure.symm.trans specializes_iff_eq
#align pure_le_nhds_iff pure_le_nhds_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhds_le_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {a b : X} : 𝓝 a ≤ 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
specializes_iff_eq
#align nhds_le_nhds_iff nhds_le_nhds_iff
instance (priority := 100) [T1Space X] : R0Space X where
specializes_symmetric _ _ := by rw [specializes_iff_eq, specializes_iff_eq]; exact Eq.symm
instance : T1Space (CofiniteTopology X) :=
t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of.mpr continuous_id
theorem t1Space_antitone : Antitone (@T1Space X) := fun a _ h _ =>
@T1Space.mk _ a fun x => (T1Space.t1 x).mono h
#align t1_space_antitone t1Space_antitone
theorem continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne [T1Space X] [DecidableEq X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
{s : Set X} {x x' : X} {y : Y} (hne : x' ≠ x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (Function.update f x y) s x' ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x' :=
EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt
(mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds <| mem_of_superset (isOpen_ne.mem_nhds hne) fun _y' hy' =>
Function.update_noteq hy' _ _)
(Function.update_noteq hne _ _)
#align continuous_within_at_update_of_ne continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne
theorem continuousAt_update_of_ne [T1Space X] [DecidableEq X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
{f : X → Y} {x x' : X} {y : Y} (hne : x' ≠ x) :
ContinuousAt (Function.update f x y) x' ↔ ContinuousAt f x' := by
simp only [← continuousWithinAt_univ, continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne hne]
#align continuous_at_update_of_ne continuousAt_update_of_ne
theorem continuousOn_update_iff [T1Space X] [DecidableEq X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
{s : Set X} {x : X} {y : Y} :
ContinuousOn (Function.update f x y) s ↔
ContinuousOn f (s \ {x}) ∧ (x ∈ s → Tendsto f (𝓝[s \ {x}] x) (𝓝 y)) := by
rw [ContinuousOn, ← and_forall_ne x, and_comm]
refine and_congr ⟨fun H z hz => ?_, fun H z hzx hzs => ?_⟩ (forall_congr' fun _ => ?_)
· specialize H z hz.2 hz.1
rw [continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne hz.2] at H
exact H.mono diff_subset
· rw [continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne hzx]
refine (H z ⟨hzs, hzx⟩).mono_of_mem (inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ ?_)
exact isOpen_ne.mem_nhds hzx
· exact continuousWithinAt_update_same
#align continuous_on_update_iff continuousOn_update_iff
theorem t1Space_of_injective_of_continuous [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (hf' : Continuous f) [T1Space Y] : T1Space X :=
t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq.2 fun _ _ h => hf (h.map hf').eq
#align t1_space_of_injective_of_continuous t1Space_of_injective_of_continuous
protected theorem Embedding.t1Space [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Embedding f) : T1Space X :=
t1Space_of_injective_of_continuous hf.inj hf.continuous
#align embedding.t1_space Embedding.t1Space
instance Subtype.t1Space {X : Type u} [TopologicalSpace X] [T1Space X] {p : X → Prop} :
T1Space (Subtype p) :=
embedding_subtype_val.t1Space
#align subtype.t1_space Subtype.t1Space
instance [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space X] [T1Space Y] : T1Space (X × Y) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b⟩ => @singleton_prod_singleton _ _ a b ▸ isClosed_singleton.prod isClosed_singleton⟩
instance {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, T1Space (X i)] :
T1Space (∀ i, X i) :=
⟨fun f => univ_pi_singleton f ▸ isClosed_set_pi fun _ _ => isClosed_singleton⟩
instance ULift.instT1Space [T1Space X] : T1Space (ULift X) :=
embedding_uLift_down.t1Space
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) TotallyDisconnectedSpace.t1Space [h: TotallyDisconnectedSpace X] :
T1Space X := by
rw [((t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 1 :)]
intro x
rw [← totallyDisconnectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent_singleton.mp h x]
exact isClosed_connectedComponent
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) T1Space.t0Space [T1Space X] : T0Space X :=
⟨fun _ _ h => h.specializes.eq⟩
#align t1_space.t0_space T1Space.t0Space
@[simp]
theorem compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {x y : X} : {x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 y ↔ y ≠ x :=
isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhds_iff
#align compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff
theorem compl_singleton_mem_nhds [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : y ≠ x) : {x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 y :=
compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff.mpr h
#align compl_singleton_mem_nhds compl_singleton_mem_nhds
@[simp]
theorem closure_singleton [T1Space X] {x : X} : closure ({x} : Set X) = {x} :=
isClosed_singleton.closure_eq
#align closure_singleton closure_singleton
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: the proof was `hs.induction_on (by simp) fun x => by simp`
theorem Set.Subsingleton.closure [T1Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : s.Subsingleton) :
(closure s).Subsingleton := by
rcases hs.eq_empty_or_singleton with (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩) <;> simp
#align set.subsingleton.closure Set.Subsingleton.closure
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_closure [T1Space X] {s : Set X} : (closure s).Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
⟨fun h => h.anti subset_closure, fun h => h.closure⟩
#align subsingleton_closure subsingleton_closure
theorem isClosedMap_const {X Y} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {y : Y} :
IsClosedMap (Function.const X y) :=
IsClosedMap.of_nonempty fun s _ h2s => by simp_rw [const, h2s.image_const, isClosed_singleton]
#align is_closed_map_const isClosedMap_const
theorem nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne [T1Space X] {x y : X} {s : Set X} (hxy : x ≠ y) :
𝓝[insert y s] x = 𝓝[s] x := by
refine le_antisymm (Filter.le_def.2 fun t ht => ?_) (nhdsWithin_mono x <| subset_insert y s)
obtain ⟨o, ho, hxo, host⟩ := mem_nhdsWithin.mp ht
refine mem_nhdsWithin.mpr ⟨o \ {y}, ho.sdiff isClosed_singleton, ⟨hxo, hxy⟩, ?_⟩
rw [inter_insert_of_not_mem <| not_mem_diff_of_mem (mem_singleton y)]
exact (inter_subset_inter diff_subset Subset.rfl).trans host
#align nhds_within_insert_of_ne nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne
/-- If `t` is a subset of `s`, except for one point,
then `insert x s` is a neighborhood of `x` within `t`. -/
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_of_subset_insert [T1Space X] {x y : X} {s t : Set X}
(hu : t ⊆ insert y s) : insert x s ∈ 𝓝[t] x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· exact mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin hu
refine nhdsWithin_mono x hu ?_
rw [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h]
exact mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin (subset_insert x s)
#align insert_mem_nhds_within_of_subset_insert insert_mem_nhdsWithin_of_subset_insert
@[simp]
theorem ker_nhds [T1Space X] (x : X) : (𝓝 x).ker = {x} := by
simp [ker_nhds_eq_specializes]
theorem biInter_basis_nhds [T1Space X] {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X} {x : X}
(h : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p s) : ⋂ (i) (_ : p i), s i = {x} := by
rw [← h.ker, ker_nhds]
#align bInter_basis_nhds biInter_basis_nhds
@[simp]
theorem compl_singleton_mem_nhdsSet_iff [T1Space X] {x : X} {s : Set X} : {x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝ˢ s ↔ x ∉ s := by
rw [isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhdsSet, subset_compl_singleton_iff]
#align compl_singleton_mem_nhds_set_iff compl_singleton_mem_nhdsSet_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_le_iff [T1Space X] {s t : Set X} : 𝓝ˢ s ≤ 𝓝ˢ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => monotone_nhdsSet h⟩
simp_rw [Filter.le_def]; intro h x hx
specialize h {x}ᶜ
simp_rw [compl_singleton_mem_nhdsSet_iff] at h
by_contra hxt
exact h hxt hx
#align nhds_set_le_iff nhdsSet_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_inj_iff [T1Space X] {s t : Set X} : 𝓝ˢ s = 𝓝ˢ t ↔ s = t := by
simp_rw [le_antisymm_iff]
exact and_congr nhdsSet_le_iff nhdsSet_le_iff
#align nhds_set_inj_iff nhdsSet_inj_iff
theorem injective_nhdsSet [T1Space X] : Function.Injective (𝓝ˢ : Set X → Filter X) := fun _ _ hst =>
nhdsSet_inj_iff.mp hst
#align injective_nhds_set injective_nhdsSet
theorem strictMono_nhdsSet [T1Space X] : StrictMono (𝓝ˢ : Set X → Filter X) :=
monotone_nhdsSet.strictMono_of_injective injective_nhdsSet
#align strict_mono_nhds_set strictMono_nhdsSet
@[simp]
theorem nhds_le_nhdsSet_iff [T1Space X] {s : Set X} {x : X} : 𝓝 x ≤ 𝓝ˢ s ↔ x ∈ s := by
rw [← nhdsSet_singleton, nhdsSet_le_iff, singleton_subset_iff]
#align nhds_le_nhds_set_iff nhds_le_nhdsSet_iff
/-- Removing a non-isolated point from a dense set, one still obtains a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.diff_singleton [T1Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : Dense s) (x : X) [NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] :
Dense (s \ {x}) :=
hs.inter_of_isOpen_right (dense_compl_singleton x) isOpen_compl_singleton
#align dense.diff_singleton Dense.diff_singleton
/-- Removing a finset from a dense set in a space without isolated points, one still
obtains a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.diff_finset [T1Space X] [∀ x : X, NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] {s : Set X} (hs : Dense s)
(t : Finset X) : Dense (s \ t) := by
induction t using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simpa using hs
| insert _ ih =>
rw [Finset.coe_insert, ← union_singleton, ← diff_diff]
exact ih.diff_singleton _
#align dense.diff_finset Dense.diff_finset
/-- Removing a finite set from a dense set in a space without isolated points, one still
obtains a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.diff_finite [T1Space X] [∀ x : X, NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] {s : Set X} (hs : Dense s)
{t : Set X} (ht : t.Finite) : Dense (s \ t) := by
convert hs.diff_finset ht.toFinset
exact (Finite.coe_toFinset _).symm
#align dense.diff_finite Dense.diff_finite
/-- If a function to a `T1Space` tends to some limit `y` at some point `x`, then necessarily
`y = f x`. -/
theorem eq_of_tendsto_nhds [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {f : X → Y} {x : X} {y : Y}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y)) : f x = y :=
by_contra fun hfa : f x ≠ y =>
have fact₁ : {f x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 y := compl_singleton_mem_nhds hfa.symm
have fact₂ : Tendsto f (pure x) (𝓝 y) := h.comp (tendsto_id'.2 <| pure_le_nhds x)
fact₂ fact₁ (Eq.refl <| f x)
#align eq_of_tendsto_nhds eq_of_tendsto_nhds
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_ne [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {g : X → Y}
{l : Filter X} {b₁ b₂ : Y} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b₁)) (hb : b₁ ≠ b₂) : ∀ᶠ z in l, g z ≠ b₂ :=
hg.eventually (isOpen_compl_singleton.eventually_mem hb)
#align filter.tendsto.eventually_ne Filter.Tendsto.eventually_ne
theorem ContinuousAt.eventually_ne [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {g : X → Y} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hg1 : ContinuousAt g x) (hg2 : g x ≠ y) : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 x, g z ≠ y :=
hg1.tendsto.eventually_ne hg2
#align continuous_at.eventually_ne ContinuousAt.eventually_ne
theorem eventually_ne_nhds [T1Space X] {a b : X} (h : a ≠ b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ≠ b :=
IsOpen.eventually_mem isOpen_ne h
theorem eventually_ne_nhdsWithin [T1Space X] {a b : X} {s : Set X} (h : a ≠ b) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ≠ b :=
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| eventually_ne_nhds h
/-- To prove a function to a `T1Space` is continuous at some point `x`, it suffices to prove that
`f` admits *some* limit at `x`. -/
theorem continuousAt_of_tendsto_nhds [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {f : X → Y} {x : X} {y : Y}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y)) : ContinuousAt f x := by
rwa [ContinuousAt, eq_of_tendsto_nhds h]
#align continuous_at_of_tendsto_nhds continuousAt_of_tendsto_nhds
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_const_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {l : Filter Y} [NeBot l] {c d : X} :
Tendsto (fun _ => c) l (𝓝 d) ↔ c = d := by simp_rw [Tendsto, Filter.map_const, pure_le_nhds_iff]
#align tendsto_const_nhds_iff tendsto_const_nhds_iff
/-- A point with a finite neighborhood has to be isolated. -/
theorem isOpen_singleton_of_finite_mem_nhds [T1Space X] (x : X)
{s : Set X} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (hsf : s.Finite) : IsOpen ({x} : Set X) := by
have A : {x} ⊆ s := by simp only [singleton_subset_iff, mem_of_mem_nhds hs]
have B : IsClosed (s \ {x}) := (hsf.subset diff_subset).isClosed
have C : (s \ {x})ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x := B.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds fun h => h.2 rfl
have D : {x} ∈ 𝓝 x := by simpa only [← diff_eq, diff_diff_cancel_left A] using inter_mem hs C
rwa [← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, ← singleton_subset_iff, subset_interior_iff_isOpen] at D
#align is_open_singleton_of_finite_mem_nhds isOpen_singleton_of_finite_mem_nhds
/-- If the punctured neighborhoods of a point form a nontrivial filter, then any neighborhood is
infinite. -/
theorem infinite_of_mem_nhds {X} [TopologicalSpace X] [T1Space X] (x : X) [hx : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)]
{s : Set X} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : Set.Infinite s := by
refine fun hsf => hx.1 ?_
rw [← isOpen_singleton_iff_punctured_nhds]
exact isOpen_singleton_of_finite_mem_nhds x hs hsf
#align infinite_of_mem_nhds infinite_of_mem_nhds
theorem discrete_of_t1_of_finite [T1Space X] [Finite X] :
DiscreteTopology X := by
apply singletons_open_iff_discrete.mp
intro x
rw [← isClosed_compl_iff]
exact (Set.toFinite _).isClosed
#align discrete_of_t1_of_finite discrete_of_t1_of_finite
theorem PreconnectedSpace.trivial_of_discrete [PreconnectedSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] :
Subsingleton X := by
rw [← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton]
rintro ⟨x, y, hxy⟩
rw [Ne, ← mem_singleton_iff, (isClopen_discrete _).eq_univ <| singleton_nonempty y] at hxy
exact hxy (mem_univ x)
#align preconnected_space.trivial_of_discrete PreconnectedSpace.trivial_of_discrete
theorem IsPreconnected.infinite_of_nontrivial [T1Space X] {s : Set X} (h : IsPreconnected s)
(hs : s.Nontrivial) : s.Infinite := by
refine mt (fun hf => (subsingleton_coe s).mp ?_) (not_subsingleton_iff.mpr hs)
haveI := @discrete_of_t1_of_finite s _ _ hf.to_subtype
exact @PreconnectedSpace.trivial_of_discrete _ _ (Subtype.preconnectedSpace h) _
#align is_preconnected.infinite_of_nontrivial IsPreconnected.infinite_of_nontrivial
theorem ConnectedSpace.infinite [ConnectedSpace X] [Nontrivial X] [T1Space X] : Infinite X :=
infinite_univ_iff.mp <| isPreconnected_univ.infinite_of_nontrivial nontrivial_univ
#align connected_space.infinite ConnectedSpace.infinite
/-- A non-trivial connected T1 space has no isolated points. -/
instance (priority := 100) ConnectedSpace.neBot_nhdsWithin_compl_of_nontrivial_of_t1space
[ConnectedSpace X] [Nontrivial X] [T1Space X] (x : X) :
NeBot (𝓝[≠] x) := by
by_contra contra
rw [not_neBot, ← isOpen_singleton_iff_punctured_nhds] at contra
replace contra := nonempty_inter isOpen_compl_singleton
contra (compl_union_self _) (Set.nonempty_compl_of_nontrivial _) (singleton_nonempty _)
simp [compl_inter_self {x}] at contra
theorem SeparationQuotient.t1Space_iff : T1Space (SeparationQuotient X) ↔ R0Space X := by
rw [r0Space_iff, ((t1Space_TFAE (SeparationQuotient X)).out 0 9 :)]
constructor
· intro h x y xspecy
rw [← Inducing.specializes_iff inducing_mk, h xspecy] at *
· rintro h ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ sxspecsy
have xspecy : x ⤳ y := (Inducing.specializes_iff inducing_mk).mp sxspecsy
have yspecx : y ⤳ x := h xspecy
erw [mk_eq_mk, inseparable_iff_specializes_and]
exact ⟨xspecy, yspecx⟩
theorem singleton_mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X}
(hx : x ∈ s) : {x} ∈ 𝓝[s] x := by
have : ({⟨x, hx⟩} : Set s) ∈ 𝓝 (⟨x, hx⟩ : s) := by simp [nhds_discrete]
simpa only [nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe hx, image_singleton] using
@image_mem_map _ _ _ ((↑) : s → X) _ this
#align singleton_mem_nhds_within_of_mem_discrete singleton_mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete
/-- The neighbourhoods filter of `x` within `s`, under the discrete topology, is equal to
the pure `x` filter (which is the principal filter at the singleton `{x}`.) -/
theorem nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X} (hx : x ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] x = pure x :=
le_antisymm (le_pure_iff.2 <| singleton_mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete hx) (pure_le_nhdsWithin hx)
#align nhds_within_of_mem_discrete nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete
theorem Filter.HasBasis.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete {ι : Type*} {p : ι → Prop}
{t : ι → Set X} {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X} (hb : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p t)
(hx : x ∈ s) : ∃ i, p i ∧ t i ∩ s = {x} := by
rcases (nhdsWithin_hasBasis hb s).mem_iff.1 (singleton_mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete hx) with
⟨i, hi, hix⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, hix.antisymm <| singleton_subset_iff.2 ⟨mem_of_mem_nhds <| hb.mem_of_mem hi, hx⟩⟩
#align filter.has_basis.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete Filter.HasBasis.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete
/-- A point `x` in a discrete subset `s` of a topological space admits a neighbourhood
that only meets `s` at `x`. -/
theorem nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X}
(hx : x ∈ s) : ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 x, U ∩ s = {x} := by
simpa using (𝓝 x).basis_sets.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
#align nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete
/-- Let `x` be a point in a discrete subset `s` of a topological space, then there exists an open
set that only meets `s` at `x`. -/
theorem isOpen_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X}
(hx : x ∈ s) : ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ U ∩ s = {x} := by
obtain ⟨U, hU_nhds, hU_inter⟩ := nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
obtain ⟨t, ht_sub, ht_open, ht_x⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp hU_nhds
refine ⟨t, ht_open, Set.Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· exact hU_inter ▸ Set.inter_subset_inter_left s ht_sub
· rw [Set.subset_inter_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨ht_x, hx⟩
/-- For point `x` in a discrete subset `s` of a topological space, there is a set `U`
such that
1. `U` is a punctured neighborhood of `x` (ie. `U ∪ {x}` is a neighbourhood of `x`),
2. `U` is disjoint from `s`.
-/
theorem disjoint_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X} (hx : x ∈ s) :
∃ U ∈ 𝓝[≠] x, Disjoint U s :=
let ⟨V, h, h'⟩ := nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
⟨{x}ᶜ ∩ V, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ h,
disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (by rw [inter_assoc, h', compl_inter_self])⟩
#align disjoint_nhds_within_of_mem_discrete disjoint_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete
/-- Let `X` be a topological space and let `s, t ⊆ X` be two subsets. If there is an inclusion
`t ⊆ s`, then the topological space structure on `t` induced by `X` is the same as the one
obtained by the induced topological space structure on `s`. Use `embedding_inclusion` instead. -/
@[deprecated embedding_inclusion (since := "2023-02-02")]
theorem TopologicalSpace.subset_trans {s t : Set X} (ts : t ⊆ s) :
(instTopologicalSpaceSubtype : TopologicalSpace t) =
(instTopologicalSpaceSubtype : TopologicalSpace s).induced (Set.inclusion ts) :=
(embedding_inclusion ts).induced
#align topological_space.subset_trans TopologicalSpace.subset_trans
/-! ### R₁ (preregular) spaces -/
section R1Space
/-- A topological space is called a *preregular* (a.k.a. R₁) space,
if any two topologically distinguishable points have disjoint neighbourhoods. -/
@[mk_iff r1Space_iff_specializes_or_disjoint_nhds]
class R1Space (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
specializes_or_disjoint_nhds (x y : X) : Specializes x y ∨ Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y)
export R1Space (specializes_or_disjoint_nhds)
variable [R1Space X] {x y : X}
instance (priority := 100) : R0Space X where
specializes_symmetric _ _ h := (specializes_or_disjoint_nhds _ _).resolve_right <| fun hd ↦
h.not_disjoint hd.symm
theorem disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_specializes : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ¬x ⤳ y :=
⟨fun hd hspec ↦ hspec.not_disjoint hd, (specializes_or_disjoint_nhds _ _).resolve_left⟩
#align disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_specializes disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_specializes
theorem specializes_iff_not_disjoint : x ⤳ y ↔ ¬Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) :=
disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_specializes.not_left.symm
theorem disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_inseparable : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ¬Inseparable x y := by
rw [disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_specializes, specializes_iff_inseparable]
theorem r1Space_iff_inseparable_or_disjoint_nhds {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]:
R1Space X ↔ ∀ x y : X, Inseparable x y ∨ Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) :=
⟨fun _h x y ↦ (specializes_or_disjoint_nhds x y).imp_left Specializes.inseparable, fun h ↦
⟨fun x y ↦ (h x y).imp_left Inseparable.specializes⟩⟩
theorem isClosed_setOf_specializes : IsClosed { p : X × X | p.1 ⤳ p.2 } := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_setOf, ← disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_specializes,
isOpen_setOf_disjoint_nhds_nhds]
#align is_closed_set_of_specializes isClosed_setOf_specializes
theorem isClosed_setOf_inseparable : IsClosed { p : X × X | Inseparable p.1 p.2 } := by
simp only [← specializes_iff_inseparable, isClosed_setOf_specializes]
#align is_closed_set_of_inseparable isClosed_setOf_inseparable
/-- In an R₁ space, a point belongs to the closure of a compact set `K`
if and only if it is topologically inseparable from some point of `K`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_closure_iff_exists_inseparable {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) :
y ∈ closure K ↔ ∃ x ∈ K, Inseparable x y := by
refine ⟨fun hy ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hxK, hxy⟩ ↦
(hxy.mem_closed_iff isClosed_closure).1 <| subset_closure hxK⟩
contrapose! hy
have : Disjoint (𝓝 y) (𝓝ˢ K) := hK.disjoint_nhdsSet_right.2 fun x hx ↦
(disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_inseparable.2 (hy x hx)).symm
simpa only [disjoint_iff, not_mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_eq_bot]
using this.mono_right principal_le_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.closure_eq_biUnion_inseparable {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) :
closure K = ⋃ x ∈ K, {y | Inseparable x y} := by
ext; simp [hK.mem_closure_iff_exists_inseparable]
/-- In an R₁ space, the closure of a compact set is the union of the closures of its points. -/
theorem IsCompact.closure_eq_biUnion_closure_singleton {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) :
closure K = ⋃ x ∈ K, closure {x} := by
simp only [hK.closure_eq_biUnion_inseparable, ← specializes_iff_inseparable,
specializes_iff_mem_closure, setOf_mem_eq]
/-- In an R₁ space, if a compact set `K` is contained in an open set `U`,
then its closure is also contained in `U`. -/
theorem IsCompact.closure_subset_of_isOpen {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K)
{U : Set X} (hU : IsOpen U) (hKU : K ⊆ U) : closure K ⊆ U := by
rw [hK.closure_eq_biUnion_inseparable, iUnion₂_subset_iff]
exact fun x hx y hxy ↦ (hxy.mem_open_iff hU).1 (hKU hx)
/-- The closure of a compact set in an R₁ space is a compact set. -/
protected theorem IsCompact.closure {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) : IsCompact (closure K) := by
refine isCompact_of_finite_subcover fun U hUo hKU ↦ ?_
rcases hK.elim_finite_subcover U hUo (subset_closure.trans hKU) with ⟨t, ht⟩
exact ⟨t, hK.closure_subset_of_isOpen (isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ ↦ hUo _) ht⟩
theorem IsCompact.closure_of_subset {s K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) (h : s ⊆ K) :
IsCompact (closure s) :=
hK.closure.of_isClosed_subset isClosed_closure (closure_mono h)
#align is_compact_closure_of_subset_compact IsCompact.closure_of_subset
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias isCompact_closure_of_subset_compact := IsCompact.closure_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem exists_isCompact_superset_iff {s : Set X} :
(∃ K, IsCompact K ∧ s ⊆ K) ↔ IsCompact (closure s) :=
⟨fun ⟨_K, hK, hsK⟩ => hK.closure_of_subset hsK, fun h => ⟨closure s, h, subset_closure⟩⟩
#align exists_compact_superset_iff exists_isCompact_superset_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias exists_compact_superset_iff := exists_isCompact_superset_iff
/-- If `K` and `L` are disjoint compact sets in an R₁ topological space
and `L` is also closed, then `K` and `L` have disjoint neighborhoods. -/
theorem SeparatedNhds.of_isCompact_isCompact_isClosed {K L : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K)
(hL : IsCompact L) (h'L : IsClosed L) (hd : Disjoint K L) : SeparatedNhds K L := by
simp_rw [separatedNhds_iff_disjoint, hK.disjoint_nhdsSet_left, hL.disjoint_nhdsSet_right,
disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_inseparable]
intro x hx y hy h
exact absurd ((h.mem_closed_iff h'L).2 hy) <| disjoint_left.1 hd hx
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias separatedNhds_of_isCompact_isCompact_isClosed := SeparatedNhds.of_isCompact_isCompact_isClosed
/-- If a compact set is covered by two open sets, then we can cover it by two compact subsets. -/
theorem IsCompact.binary_compact_cover {K U V : Set X}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hU : IsOpen U) (hV : IsOpen V) (h2K : K ⊆ U ∪ V) :
∃ K₁ K₂ : Set X, IsCompact K₁ ∧ IsCompact K₂ ∧ K₁ ⊆ U ∧ K₂ ⊆ V ∧ K = K₁ ∪ K₂ := by
have hK' : IsCompact (closure K) := hK.closure
have : SeparatedNhds (closure K \ U) (closure K \ V) := by
apply SeparatedNhds.of_isCompact_isCompact_isClosed (hK'.diff hU) (hK'.diff hV)
(isClosed_closure.sdiff hV)
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, diff_inter_diff, diff_eq_empty]
exact hK.closure_subset_of_isOpen (hU.union hV) h2K
have : SeparatedNhds (K \ U) (K \ V) :=
this.mono (diff_subset_diff_left (subset_closure)) (diff_subset_diff_left (subset_closure))
rcases this with ⟨O₁, O₂, h1O₁, h1O₂, h2O₁, h2O₂, hO⟩
exact ⟨K \ O₁, K \ O₂, hK.diff h1O₁, hK.diff h1O₂, diff_subset_comm.mp h2O₁,
diff_subset_comm.mp h2O₂, by rw [← diff_inter, hO.inter_eq, diff_empty]⟩
#align is_compact.binary_compact_cover IsCompact.binary_compact_cover
/-- For every finite open cover `Uᵢ` of a compact set, there exists a compact cover `Kᵢ ⊆ Uᵢ`. -/
theorem IsCompact.finite_compact_cover {s : Set X} (hs : IsCompact s) {ι : Type*}
(t : Finset ι) (U : ι → Set X) (hU : ∀ i ∈ t, IsOpen (U i)) (hsC : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
∃ K : ι → Set X, (∀ i, IsCompact (K i)) ∧ (∀ i, K i ⊆ U i) ∧ s = ⋃ i ∈ t, K i := by
induction' t using Finset.induction with x t hx ih generalizing U s
· refine ⟨fun _ => ∅, fun _ => isCompact_empty, fun i => empty_subset _, ?_⟩
simpa only [subset_empty_iff, Finset.not_mem_empty, iUnion_false, iUnion_empty] using hsC
simp only [Finset.set_biUnion_insert] at hsC
simp only [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hU
have hU' : ∀ i ∈ t, IsOpen (U i) := fun i hi => hU.2 i hi
rcases hs.binary_compact_cover hU.1 (isOpen_biUnion hU') hsC with
⟨K₁, K₂, h1K₁, h1K₂, h2K₁, h2K₂, hK⟩
rcases ih h1K₂ U hU' h2K₂ with ⟨K, h1K, h2K, h3K⟩
refine ⟨update K x K₁, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro i
rcases eq_or_ne i x with rfl | hi
· simp only [update_same, h1K₁]
· simp only [update_noteq hi, h1K]
· intro i
rcases eq_or_ne i x with rfl | hi
· simp only [update_same, h2K₁]
· simp only [update_noteq hi, h2K]
· simp only [Finset.set_biUnion_insert_update _ hx, hK, h3K]
#align is_compact.finite_compact_cover IsCompact.finite_compact_cover
theorem R1Space.of_continuous_specializes_imp [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → X} (hc : Continuous f)
(hspec : ∀ x y, f x ⤳ f y → x ⤳ y) : R1Space Y where
specializes_or_disjoint_nhds x y := (specializes_or_disjoint_nhds (f x) (f y)).imp (hspec x y) <|
((hc.tendsto _).disjoint · (hc.tendsto _))
theorem Inducing.r1Space [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → X} (hf : Inducing f) : R1Space Y :=
.of_continuous_specializes_imp hf.continuous fun _ _ ↦ hf.specializes_iff.1
protected theorem R1Space.induced (f : Y → X) : @R1Space Y (.induced f ‹_›) :=
@Inducing.r1Space _ _ _ _ (.induced f _) f (inducing_induced f)
instance (p : X → Prop) : R1Space (Subtype p) := .induced _
protected theorem R1Space.sInf {X : Type*} {T : Set (TopologicalSpace X)}
(hT : ∀ t ∈ T, @R1Space X t) : @R1Space X (sInf T) := by
let _ := sInf T
refine ⟨fun x y ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [Specializes, nhds_sInf]
rcases em (∃ t ∈ T, Disjoint (@nhds X t x) (@nhds X t y)) with ⟨t, htT, htd⟩ | hTd
· exact .inr <| htd.mono (iInf₂_le t htT) (iInf₂_le t htT)
· push_neg at hTd
exact .inl <| iInf₂_mono fun t ht ↦ ((hT t ht).1 x y).resolve_right (hTd t ht)
protected theorem R1Space.iInf {ι X : Type*} {t : ι → TopologicalSpace X}
(ht : ∀ i, @R1Space X (t i)) : @R1Space X (iInf t) :=
.sInf <| forall_mem_range.2 ht
protected theorem R1Space.inf {X : Type*} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X}
(h₁ : @R1Space X t₁) (h₂ : @R1Space X t₂) : @R1Space X (t₁ ⊓ t₂) := by
rw [inf_eq_iInf]
apply R1Space.iInf
simp [*]
instance [TopologicalSpace Y] [R1Space Y] : R1Space (X × Y) :=
.inf (.induced _) (.induced _)
instance {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, R1Space (X i)] :
R1Space (∀ i, X i) :=
.iInf fun _ ↦ .induced _
theorem exists_mem_nhds_isCompact_mapsTo_of_isCompact_mem_nhds
{X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [R1Space Y] {f : X → Y} {x : X}
{K : Set X} {s : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) (hKc : IsCompact K)
(hKx : K ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ K ∈ 𝓝 x, IsCompact K ∧ MapsTo f K s := by
have hc : IsCompact (f '' K \ interior s) := (hKc.image hf).diff isOpen_interior
obtain ⟨U, V, Uo, Vo, hxU, hV, hd⟩ : SeparatedNhds {f x} (f '' K \ interior s) := by
simp_rw [separatedNhds_iff_disjoint, nhdsSet_singleton, hc.disjoint_nhdsSet_right,
disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_inseparable]
rintro y ⟨-, hys⟩ hxy
refine hys <| (hxy.mem_open_iff isOpen_interior).1 ?_
rwa [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
refine ⟨K \ f ⁻¹' V, diff_mem hKx ?_, hKc.diff <| Vo.preimage hf, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
· filter_upwards [hf.continuousAt <| Uo.mem_nhds (hxU rfl)] with x hx
using Set.disjoint_left.1 hd hx
· by_contra hys
exact hy.2 (hV ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ hy.1, not_mem_subset interior_subset hys⟩)
instance (priority := 900) {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] [R1Space Y] : LocallyCompactPair X Y where
exists_mem_nhds_isCompact_mapsTo hf hs :=
let ⟨_K, hKc, hKx⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds _
exists_mem_nhds_isCompact_mapsTo_of_isCompact_mem_nhds hf hs hKc hKx
/-- If a point in an R₁ space has a compact neighborhood,
then it has a basis of compact closed neighborhoods. -/
theorem IsCompact.isCompact_isClosed_basis_nhds {x : X} {L : Set X} (hLc : IsCompact L)
(hxL : L ∈ 𝓝 x) : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun K ↦ K ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ IsCompact K ∧ IsClosed K) (·) :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun _U hU ↦
let ⟨K, hKx, hKc, hKU⟩ := exists_mem_nhds_isCompact_mapsTo_of_isCompact_mem_nhds
continuous_id (interior_mem_nhds.2 hU) hLc hxL
⟨closure K, mem_of_superset hKx subset_closure, ⟨hKc.closure, isClosed_closure⟩,
(hKc.closure_subset_of_isOpen isOpen_interior hKU).trans interior_subset⟩
/-- In an R₁ space, the filters `coclosedCompact` and `cocompact` are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem Filter.coclosedCompact_eq_cocompact : coclosedCompact X = cocompact X := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ cocompact_le_coclosedCompact
rw [hasBasis_coclosedCompact.le_basis_iff hasBasis_cocompact]
exact fun K hK ↦ ⟨closure K, ⟨isClosed_closure, hK.closure⟩, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_closure⟩
#align filter.coclosed_compact_eq_cocompact Filter.coclosedCompact_eq_cocompact
/-- In an R₁ space, the bornologies `relativelyCompact` and `inCompact` are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem Bornology.relativelyCompact_eq_inCompact :
Bornology.relativelyCompact X = Bornology.inCompact X :=
Bornology.ext _ _ Filter.coclosedCompact_eq_cocompact
#align bornology.relatively_compact_eq_in_compact Bornology.relativelyCompact_eq_inCompact
/-!
### Lemmas about a weakly locally compact R₁ space
In fact, a space with these properties is locally compact and regular.
Some lemmas are formulated using the latter assumptions below.
-/
variable [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace X]
/-- In a (weakly) locally compact R₁ space, compact closed neighborhoods of a point `x`
form a basis of neighborhoods of `x`. -/
theorem isCompact_isClosed_basis_nhds (x : X) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun K => K ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ IsCompact K ∧ IsClosed K) (·) :=
let ⟨_L, hLc, hLx⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x
hLc.isCompact_isClosed_basis_nhds hLx
/-- In a (weakly) locally compact R₁ space, each point admits a compact closed neighborhood. -/
theorem exists_mem_nhds_isCompact_isClosed (x : X) : ∃ K ∈ 𝓝 x, IsCompact K ∧ IsClosed K :=
(isCompact_isClosed_basis_nhds x).ex_mem
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A weakly locally compact R₁ space is locally compact. -/
instance (priority := 80) WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace.locallyCompactSpace : LocallyCompactSpace X :=
.of_hasBasis isCompact_isClosed_basis_nhds fun _ _ ⟨_, h, _⟩ ↦ h
#align locally_compact_of_compact_nhds WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace.locallyCompactSpace
/-- In a weakly locally compact R₁ space,
every compact set has an open neighborhood with compact closure. -/
theorem exists_isOpen_superset_and_isCompact_closure {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) :
∃ V, IsOpen V ∧ K ⊆ V ∧ IsCompact (closure V) := by
rcases exists_compact_superset hK with ⟨K', hK', hKK'⟩
exact ⟨interior K', isOpen_interior, hKK', hK'.closure_of_subset interior_subset⟩
#align exists_open_superset_and_is_compact_closure exists_isOpen_superset_and_isCompact_closure
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias exists_open_superset_and_isCompact_closure := exists_isOpen_superset_and_isCompact_closure
/-- In a weakly locally compact R₁ space,
every point has an open neighborhood with compact closure. -/
theorem exists_isOpen_mem_isCompact_closure (x : X) :
∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ IsCompact (closure U) := by
simpa only [singleton_subset_iff]
using exists_isOpen_superset_and_isCompact_closure isCompact_singleton
#align exists_open_with_compact_closure exists_isOpen_mem_isCompact_closure
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias exists_open_with_compact_closure := exists_isOpen_mem_isCompact_closure
end R1Space
/-- A T₂ space, also known as a Hausdorff space, is one in which for every
`x ≠ y` there exists disjoint open sets around `x` and `y`. This is
the most widely used of the separation axioms. -/
@[mk_iff]
class T2Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- Every two points in a Hausdorff space admit disjoint open neighbourhoods. -/
t2 : Pairwise fun x y => ∃ u v : Set X, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ x ∈ u ∧ y ∈ v ∧ Disjoint u v
#align t2_space T2Space
/-- Two different points can be separated by open sets. -/
theorem t2_separation [T2Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ u v : Set X, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ x ∈ u ∧ y ∈ v ∧ Disjoint u v :=
T2Space.t2 h
#align t2_separation t2_separation
-- todo: use this as a definition?
theorem t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds : T2Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y : X => Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) := by
refine (t2Space_iff X).trans (forall₃_congr fun x y _ => ?_)
simp only [(nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff (nhds_basis_opens y), exists_prop, ← exists_and_left,
and_assoc, and_comm, and_left_comm]
#align t2_space_iff_disjoint_nhds t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_nhds_nhds [T2Space X] {x y : X} : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ x ≠ y :=
⟨fun hd he => by simp [he, nhds_neBot.ne] at hd, (t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds.mp ‹_› ·)⟩
#align disjoint_nhds_nhds disjoint_nhds_nhds
theorem pairwise_disjoint_nhds [T2Space X] : Pairwise (Disjoint on (𝓝 : X → Filter X)) := fun _ _ =>
disjoint_nhds_nhds.2
#align pairwise_disjoint_nhds pairwise_disjoint_nhds
protected theorem Set.pairwiseDisjoint_nhds [T2Space X] (s : Set X) : s.PairwiseDisjoint 𝓝 :=
pairwise_disjoint_nhds.set_pairwise s
#align set.pairwise_disjoint_nhds Set.pairwiseDisjoint_nhds
/-- Points of a finite set can be separated by open sets from each other. -/
theorem Set.Finite.t2_separation [T2Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : s.Finite) :
∃ U : X → Set X, (∀ x, x ∈ U x ∧ IsOpen (U x)) ∧ s.PairwiseDisjoint U :=
s.pairwiseDisjoint_nhds.exists_mem_filter_basis hs nhds_basis_opens
#align set.finite.t2_separation Set.Finite.t2_separation
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) T2Space.t1Space [T2Space X] : T1Space X :=
t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds.mpr fun _ _ hne =>
(disjoint_nhds_nhds.2 hne).mono_left <| pure_le_nhds _
#align t2_space.t1_space T2Space.t1Space
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) T2Space.r1Space [T2Space X] : R1Space X :=
⟨fun x y ↦ (eq_or_ne x y).imp specializes_of_eq disjoint_nhds_nhds.2⟩
theorem SeparationQuotient.t2Space_iff : T2Space (SeparationQuotient X) ↔ R1Space X := by
simp only [t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds, Pairwise, surjective_mk.forall₂, ne_eq, mk_eq_mk,
r1Space_iff_inseparable_or_disjoint_nhds, ← disjoint_comap_iff surjective_mk, comap_mk_nhds_mk,
← or_iff_not_imp_left]
instance SeparationQuotient.t2Space [R1Space X] : T2Space (SeparationQuotient X) :=
t2Space_iff.2 ‹_›
instance (priority := 80) [R1Space X] [T0Space X] : T2Space X :=
t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds.2 fun _x _y hne ↦ disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_inseparable.2 fun hxy ↦
hne hxy.eq
| Mathlib/Topology/Separation.lean | 1,352 | 1,353 | theorem R1Space.t2Space_iff_t0Space [R1Space X] : T2Space X ↔ T0Space X := by |
constructor <;> intro <;> infer_instance
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Odd
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.deriv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
/-!
# Differentiability of trigonometric functions
## Main statements
The differentiability of the usual trigonometric functions is proved, and their derivatives are
computed.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Topology Filter
open Set Filter
namespace Complex
/-- The complex sine function is everywhere strictly differentiable, with the derivative `cos x`. -/
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_sin (x : ℂ) : HasStrictDerivAt sin (cos x) x := by
simp only [cos, div_eq_mul_inv]
convert ((((hasStrictDerivAt_id x).neg.mul_const I).cexp.sub
((hasStrictDerivAt_id x).mul_const I).cexp).mul_const I).mul_const (2 : ℂ)⁻¹ using 1
simp only [Function.comp, id]
rw [sub_mul, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, I_mul_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg, mul_one, one_mul, mul_assoc,
I_mul_I, mul_neg_one, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm]
#align complex.has_strict_deriv_at_sin Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_sin
/-- The complex sine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative `cos x`. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_sin (x : ℂ) : HasDerivAt sin (cos x) x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_sin x).hasDerivAt
#align complex.has_deriv_at_sin Complex.hasDerivAt_sin
theorem contDiff_sin {n} : ContDiff ℂ n sin :=
(((contDiff_neg.mul contDiff_const).cexp.sub (contDiff_id.mul contDiff_const).cexp).mul
contDiff_const).div_const _
#align complex.cont_diff_sin Complex.contDiff_sin
theorem differentiable_sin : Differentiable ℂ sin := fun x => (hasDerivAt_sin x).differentiableAt
#align complex.differentiable_sin Complex.differentiable_sin
theorem differentiableAt_sin {x : ℂ} : DifferentiableAt ℂ sin x :=
differentiable_sin x
#align complex.differentiable_at_sin Complex.differentiableAt_sin
@[simp]
theorem deriv_sin : deriv sin = cos :=
funext fun x => (hasDerivAt_sin x).deriv
#align complex.deriv_sin Complex.deriv_sin
/-- The complex cosine function is everywhere strictly differentiable, with the derivative
`-sin x`. -/
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_cos (x : ℂ) : HasStrictDerivAt cos (-sin x) x := by
simp only [sin, div_eq_mul_inv, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
convert (((hasStrictDerivAt_id x).mul_const I).cexp.add
((hasStrictDerivAt_id x).neg.mul_const I).cexp).mul_const (2 : ℂ)⁻¹ using 1
simp only [Function.comp, id]
ring
#align complex.has_strict_deriv_at_cos Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cos
/-- The complex cosine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative `-sin x`. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_cos (x : ℂ) : HasDerivAt cos (-sin x) x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_cos x).hasDerivAt
#align complex.has_deriv_at_cos Complex.hasDerivAt_cos
theorem contDiff_cos {n} : ContDiff ℂ n cos :=
((contDiff_id.mul contDiff_const).cexp.add (contDiff_neg.mul contDiff_const).cexp).div_const _
#align complex.cont_diff_cos Complex.contDiff_cos
theorem differentiable_cos : Differentiable ℂ cos := fun x => (hasDerivAt_cos x).differentiableAt
#align complex.differentiable_cos Complex.differentiable_cos
theorem differentiableAt_cos {x : ℂ} : DifferentiableAt ℂ cos x :=
differentiable_cos x
#align complex.differentiable_at_cos Complex.differentiableAt_cos
theorem deriv_cos {x : ℂ} : deriv cos x = -sin x :=
(hasDerivAt_cos x).deriv
#align complex.deriv_cos Complex.deriv_cos
@[simp]
theorem deriv_cos' : deriv cos = fun x => -sin x :=
funext fun _ => deriv_cos
#align complex.deriv_cos' Complex.deriv_cos'
/-- The complex hyperbolic sine function is everywhere strictly differentiable, with the derivative
`cosh x`. -/
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_sinh (x : ℂ) : HasStrictDerivAt sinh (cosh x) x := by
simp only [cosh, div_eq_mul_inv]
convert ((hasStrictDerivAt_exp x).sub (hasStrictDerivAt_id x).neg.cexp).mul_const (2 : ℂ)⁻¹
using 1
rw [id, mul_neg_one, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg]
#align complex.has_strict_deriv_at_sinh Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_sinh
/-- The complex hyperbolic sine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative
`cosh x`. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_sinh (x : ℂ) : HasDerivAt sinh (cosh x) x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_sinh x).hasDerivAt
#align complex.has_deriv_at_sinh Complex.hasDerivAt_sinh
theorem contDiff_sinh {n} : ContDiff ℂ n sinh :=
(contDiff_exp.sub contDiff_neg.cexp).div_const _
#align complex.cont_diff_sinh Complex.contDiff_sinh
theorem differentiable_sinh : Differentiable ℂ sinh := fun x => (hasDerivAt_sinh x).differentiableAt
#align complex.differentiable_sinh Complex.differentiable_sinh
theorem differentiableAt_sinh {x : ℂ} : DifferentiableAt ℂ sinh x :=
differentiable_sinh x
#align complex.differentiable_at_sinh Complex.differentiableAt_sinh
@[simp]
theorem deriv_sinh : deriv sinh = cosh :=
funext fun x => (hasDerivAt_sinh x).deriv
#align complex.deriv_sinh Complex.deriv_sinh
/-- The complex hyperbolic cosine function is everywhere strictly differentiable, with the
derivative `sinh x`. -/
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_cosh (x : ℂ) : HasStrictDerivAt cosh (sinh x) x := by
simp only [sinh, div_eq_mul_inv]
convert ((hasStrictDerivAt_exp x).add (hasStrictDerivAt_id x).neg.cexp).mul_const (2 : ℂ)⁻¹
using 1
rw [id, mul_neg_one, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align complex.has_strict_deriv_at_cosh Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cosh
/-- The complex hyperbolic cosine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative
`sinh x`. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_cosh (x : ℂ) : HasDerivAt cosh (sinh x) x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_cosh x).hasDerivAt
#align complex.has_deriv_at_cosh Complex.hasDerivAt_cosh
theorem contDiff_cosh {n} : ContDiff ℂ n cosh :=
(contDiff_exp.add contDiff_neg.cexp).div_const _
#align complex.cont_diff_cosh Complex.contDiff_cosh
theorem differentiable_cosh : Differentiable ℂ cosh := fun x => (hasDerivAt_cosh x).differentiableAt
#align complex.differentiable_cosh Complex.differentiable_cosh
theorem differentiableAt_cosh {x : ℂ} : DifferentiableAt ℂ cosh x :=
differentiable_cosh x
#align complex.differentiable_at_cosh Complex.differentiableAt_cosh
@[simp]
theorem deriv_cosh : deriv cosh = sinh :=
funext fun x => (hasDerivAt_cosh x).deriv
#align complex.deriv_cosh Complex.deriv_cosh
end Complex
section
/-! ### Simp lemmas for derivatives of `fun x => Complex.cos (f x)` etc., `f : ℂ → ℂ` -/
variable {f : ℂ → ℂ} {f' x : ℂ} {s : Set ℂ}
/-! #### `Complex.cos` -/
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.ccos (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) (-Complex.sin (f x) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cos (f x)).comp x hf
#align has_strict_deriv_at.ccos HasStrictDerivAt.ccos
theorem HasDerivAt.ccos (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) (-Complex.sin (f x) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_cos (f x)).comp x hf
#align has_deriv_at.ccos HasDerivAt.ccos
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.ccos (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) (-Complex.sin (f x) * f') s x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_cos (f x)).comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
#align has_deriv_within_at.ccos HasDerivWithinAt.ccos
theorem derivWithin_ccos (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt ℂ s x) :
derivWithin (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) s x = -Complex.sin (f x) * derivWithin f s x :=
hf.hasDerivWithinAt.ccos.derivWithin hxs
#align deriv_within_ccos derivWithin_ccos
@[simp]
theorem deriv_ccos (hc : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
deriv (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) x = -Complex.sin (f x) * deriv f x :=
hc.hasDerivAt.ccos.deriv
#align deriv_ccos deriv_ccos
/-! #### `Complex.sin` -/
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.csin (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) (Complex.cos (f x) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_sin (f x)).comp x hf
#align has_strict_deriv_at.csin HasStrictDerivAt.csin
theorem HasDerivAt.csin (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) (Complex.cos (f x) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_sin (f x)).comp x hf
#align has_deriv_at.csin HasDerivAt.csin
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.csin (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) (Complex.cos (f x) * f') s x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_sin (f x)).comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
#align has_deriv_within_at.csin HasDerivWithinAt.csin
theorem derivWithin_csin (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt ℂ s x) :
derivWithin (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) s x = Complex.cos (f x) * derivWithin f s x :=
hf.hasDerivWithinAt.csin.derivWithin hxs
#align deriv_within_csin derivWithin_csin
@[simp]
theorem deriv_csin (hc : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
deriv (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) x = Complex.cos (f x) * deriv f x :=
hc.hasDerivAt.csin.deriv
#align deriv_csin deriv_csin
/-! #### `Complex.cosh` -/
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.ccosh (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) (Complex.sinh (f x) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cosh (f x)).comp x hf
#align has_strict_deriv_at.ccosh HasStrictDerivAt.ccosh
theorem HasDerivAt.ccosh (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) (Complex.sinh (f x) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_cosh (f x)).comp x hf
#align has_deriv_at.ccosh HasDerivAt.ccosh
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.ccosh (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) (Complex.sinh (f x) * f') s x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_cosh (f x)).comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
#align has_deriv_within_at.ccosh HasDerivWithinAt.ccosh
theorem derivWithin_ccosh (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt ℂ s x) :
derivWithin (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) s x = Complex.sinh (f x) * derivWithin f s x :=
hf.hasDerivWithinAt.ccosh.derivWithin hxs
#align deriv_within_ccosh derivWithin_ccosh
@[simp]
theorem deriv_ccosh (hc : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
deriv (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) x = Complex.sinh (f x) * deriv f x :=
hc.hasDerivAt.ccosh.deriv
#align deriv_ccosh deriv_ccosh
/-! #### `Complex.sinh` -/
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.csinh (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) (Complex.cosh (f x) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_sinh (f x)).comp x hf
#align has_strict_deriv_at.csinh HasStrictDerivAt.csinh
theorem HasDerivAt.csinh (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) (Complex.cosh (f x) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_sinh (f x)).comp x hf
#align has_deriv_at.csinh HasDerivAt.csinh
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.csinh (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) (Complex.cosh (f x) * f') s x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_sinh (f x)).comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
#align has_deriv_within_at.csinh HasDerivWithinAt.csinh
theorem derivWithin_csinh (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt ℂ s x) :
derivWithin (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) s x = Complex.cosh (f x) * derivWithin f s x :=
hf.hasDerivWithinAt.csinh.derivWithin hxs
#align deriv_within_csinh derivWithin_csinh
@[simp]
theorem deriv_csinh (hc : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
deriv (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) x = Complex.cosh (f x) * deriv f x :=
hc.hasDerivAt.csinh.deriv
#align deriv_csinh deriv_csinh
end
section
/-! ### Simp lemmas for derivatives of `fun x => Complex.cos (f x)` etc., `f : E → ℂ` -/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f : E → ℂ} {f' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ} {x : E}
{s : Set E}
/-! #### `Complex.cos` -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.ccos (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) (-Complex.sin (f x) • f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cos (f x)).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.ccos HasStrictFDerivAt.ccos
theorem HasFDerivAt.ccos (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) (-Complex.sin (f x) • f') x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_cos (f x)).comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
#align has_fderiv_at.ccos HasFDerivAt.ccos
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.ccos (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) (-Complex.sin (f x) • f') s x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_cos (f x)).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
#align has_fderiv_within_at.ccos HasFDerivWithinAt.ccos
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.ccos (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) s x :=
hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.ccos.differentiableWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.ccos DifferentiableWithinAt.ccos
@[simp]
theorem DifferentiableAt.ccos (hc : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) x :=
hc.hasFDerivAt.ccos.differentiableAt
#align differentiable_at.ccos DifferentiableAt.ccos
theorem DifferentiableOn.ccos (hc : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s) :
DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) s := fun x h => (hc x h).ccos
#align differentiable_on.ccos DifferentiableOn.ccos
@[simp]
theorem Differentiable.ccos (hc : Differentiable ℂ f) :
Differentiable ℂ fun x => Complex.cos (f x) := fun x => (hc x).ccos
#align differentiable.ccos Differentiable.ccos
theorem fderivWithin_ccos (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt ℂ s x) :
fderivWithin ℂ (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) s x = -Complex.sin (f x) • fderivWithin ℂ f s x :=
hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.ccos.fderivWithin hxs
#align fderiv_within_ccos fderivWithin_ccos
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- `simp` times out trying to find `Module ℂ (E →L[ℂ] ℂ)`
-- with all of `Mathlib` opened -- no idea why
theorem fderiv_ccos (hc : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
fderiv ℂ (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) x = -Complex.sin (f x) • fderiv ℂ f x :=
hc.hasFDerivAt.ccos.fderiv
#align fderiv_ccos fderiv_ccos
theorem ContDiff.ccos {n} (h : ContDiff ℂ n f) : ContDiff ℂ n fun x => Complex.cos (f x) :=
Complex.contDiff_cos.comp h
#align cont_diff.ccos ContDiff.ccos
theorem ContDiffAt.ccos {n} (hf : ContDiffAt ℂ n f x) :
ContDiffAt ℂ n (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) x :=
Complex.contDiff_cos.contDiffAt.comp x hf
#align cont_diff_at.ccos ContDiffAt.ccos
theorem ContDiffOn.ccos {n} (hf : ContDiffOn ℂ n f s) :
ContDiffOn ℂ n (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) s :=
Complex.contDiff_cos.comp_contDiffOn hf
#align cont_diff_on.ccos ContDiffOn.ccos
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.ccos {n} (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℂ n f s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℂ n (fun x => Complex.cos (f x)) s x :=
Complex.contDiff_cos.contDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt x hf
#align cont_diff_within_at.ccos ContDiffWithinAt.ccos
/-! #### `Complex.sin` -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.csin (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) (Complex.cos (f x) • f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_sin (f x)).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.csin HasStrictFDerivAt.csin
theorem HasFDerivAt.csin (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) (Complex.cos (f x) • f') x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_sin (f x)).comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
#align has_fderiv_at.csin HasFDerivAt.csin
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.csin (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) (Complex.cos (f x) • f') s x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_sin (f x)).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
#align has_fderiv_within_at.csin HasFDerivWithinAt.csin
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.csin (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) s x :=
hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.csin.differentiableWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.csin DifferentiableWithinAt.csin
@[simp]
theorem DifferentiableAt.csin (hc : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) x :=
hc.hasFDerivAt.csin.differentiableAt
#align differentiable_at.csin DifferentiableAt.csin
theorem DifferentiableOn.csin (hc : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s) :
DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) s := fun x h => (hc x h).csin
#align differentiable_on.csin DifferentiableOn.csin
@[simp]
theorem Differentiable.csin (hc : Differentiable ℂ f) :
Differentiable ℂ fun x => Complex.sin (f x) := fun x => (hc x).csin
#align differentiable.csin Differentiable.csin
theorem fderivWithin_csin (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt ℂ s x) :
fderivWithin ℂ (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) s x = Complex.cos (f x) • fderivWithin ℂ f s x :=
hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.csin.fderivWithin hxs
#align fderiv_within_csin fderivWithin_csin
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_csin (hc : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
fderiv ℂ (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) x = Complex.cos (f x) • fderiv ℂ f x :=
hc.hasFDerivAt.csin.fderiv
#align fderiv_csin fderiv_csin
theorem ContDiff.csin {n} (h : ContDiff ℂ n f) : ContDiff ℂ n fun x => Complex.sin (f x) :=
Complex.contDiff_sin.comp h
#align cont_diff.csin ContDiff.csin
theorem ContDiffAt.csin {n} (hf : ContDiffAt ℂ n f x) :
ContDiffAt ℂ n (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) x :=
Complex.contDiff_sin.contDiffAt.comp x hf
#align cont_diff_at.csin ContDiffAt.csin
theorem ContDiffOn.csin {n} (hf : ContDiffOn ℂ n f s) :
ContDiffOn ℂ n (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) s :=
Complex.contDiff_sin.comp_contDiffOn hf
#align cont_diff_on.csin ContDiffOn.csin
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.csin {n} (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℂ n f s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℂ n (fun x => Complex.sin (f x)) s x :=
Complex.contDiff_sin.contDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt x hf
#align cont_diff_within_at.csin ContDiffWithinAt.csin
/-! #### `Complex.cosh` -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.ccosh (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) (Complex.sinh (f x) • f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cosh (f x)).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.ccosh HasStrictFDerivAt.ccosh
theorem HasFDerivAt.ccosh (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) (Complex.sinh (f x) • f') x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_cosh (f x)).comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
#align has_fderiv_at.ccosh HasFDerivAt.ccosh
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.ccosh (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) (Complex.sinh (f x) • f') s x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_cosh (f x)).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
#align has_fderiv_within_at.ccosh HasFDerivWithinAt.ccosh
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.ccosh (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) s x :=
hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.ccosh.differentiableWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.ccosh DifferentiableWithinAt.ccosh
@[simp]
theorem DifferentiableAt.ccosh (hc : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) x :=
hc.hasFDerivAt.ccosh.differentiableAt
#align differentiable_at.ccosh DifferentiableAt.ccosh
theorem DifferentiableOn.ccosh (hc : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s) :
DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) s := fun x h => (hc x h).ccosh
#align differentiable_on.ccosh DifferentiableOn.ccosh
@[simp]
theorem Differentiable.ccosh (hc : Differentiable ℂ f) :
Differentiable ℂ fun x => Complex.cosh (f x) := fun x => (hc x).ccosh
#align differentiable.ccosh Differentiable.ccosh
theorem fderivWithin_ccosh (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt ℂ s x) :
fderivWithin ℂ (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) s x = Complex.sinh (f x) • fderivWithin ℂ f s x :=
hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.ccosh.fderivWithin hxs
#align fderiv_within_ccosh fderivWithin_ccosh
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_ccosh (hc : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
fderiv ℂ (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) x = Complex.sinh (f x) • fderiv ℂ f x :=
hc.hasFDerivAt.ccosh.fderiv
#align fderiv_ccosh fderiv_ccosh
theorem ContDiff.ccosh {n} (h : ContDiff ℂ n f) : ContDiff ℂ n fun x => Complex.cosh (f x) :=
Complex.contDiff_cosh.comp h
#align cont_diff.ccosh ContDiff.ccosh
theorem ContDiffAt.ccosh {n} (hf : ContDiffAt ℂ n f x) :
ContDiffAt ℂ n (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) x :=
Complex.contDiff_cosh.contDiffAt.comp x hf
#align cont_diff_at.ccosh ContDiffAt.ccosh
theorem ContDiffOn.ccosh {n} (hf : ContDiffOn ℂ n f s) :
ContDiffOn ℂ n (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) s :=
Complex.contDiff_cosh.comp_contDiffOn hf
#align cont_diff_on.ccosh ContDiffOn.ccosh
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.ccosh {n} (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℂ n f s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℂ n (fun x => Complex.cosh (f x)) s x :=
Complex.contDiff_cosh.contDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt x hf
#align cont_diff_within_at.ccosh ContDiffWithinAt.ccosh
/-! #### `Complex.sinh` -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.csinh (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) (Complex.cosh (f x) • f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_sinh (f x)).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.csinh HasStrictFDerivAt.csinh
theorem HasFDerivAt.csinh (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) (Complex.cosh (f x) • f') x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_sinh (f x)).comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
#align has_fderiv_at.csinh HasFDerivAt.csinh
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.csinh (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) (Complex.cosh (f x) • f') s x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_sinh (f x)).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
#align has_fderiv_within_at.csinh HasFDerivWithinAt.csinh
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.csinh (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) s x :=
hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.csinh.differentiableWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.csinh DifferentiableWithinAt.csinh
@[simp]
theorem DifferentiableAt.csinh (hc : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) x :=
hc.hasFDerivAt.csinh.differentiableAt
#align differentiable_at.csinh DifferentiableAt.csinh
theorem DifferentiableOn.csinh (hc : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s) :
DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) s := fun x h => (hc x h).csinh
#align differentiable_on.csinh DifferentiableOn.csinh
@[simp]
theorem Differentiable.csinh (hc : Differentiable ℂ f) :
Differentiable ℂ fun x => Complex.sinh (f x) := fun x => (hc x).csinh
#align differentiable.csinh Differentiable.csinh
theorem fderivWithin_csinh (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt ℂ s x) :
fderivWithin ℂ (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) s x = Complex.cosh (f x) • fderivWithin ℂ f s x :=
hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.csinh.fderivWithin hxs
#align fderiv_within_csinh fderivWithin_csinh
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_csinh (hc : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
fderiv ℂ (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) x = Complex.cosh (f x) • fderiv ℂ f x :=
hc.hasFDerivAt.csinh.fderiv
#align fderiv_csinh fderiv_csinh
theorem ContDiff.csinh {n} (h : ContDiff ℂ n f) : ContDiff ℂ n fun x => Complex.sinh (f x) :=
Complex.contDiff_sinh.comp h
#align cont_diff.csinh ContDiff.csinh
theorem ContDiffAt.csinh {n} (hf : ContDiffAt ℂ n f x) :
ContDiffAt ℂ n (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) x :=
Complex.contDiff_sinh.contDiffAt.comp x hf
#align cont_diff_at.csinh ContDiffAt.csinh
theorem ContDiffOn.csinh {n} (hf : ContDiffOn ℂ n f s) :
ContDiffOn ℂ n (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) s :=
Complex.contDiff_sinh.comp_contDiffOn hf
#align cont_diff_on.csinh ContDiffOn.csinh
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.csinh {n} (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℂ n f s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℂ n (fun x => Complex.sinh (f x)) s x :=
Complex.contDiff_sinh.contDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt x hf
#align cont_diff_within_at.csinh ContDiffWithinAt.csinh
end
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_sin (x : ℝ) : HasStrictDerivAt sin (cos x) x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_sin x).real_of_complex
#align real.has_strict_deriv_at_sin Real.hasStrictDerivAt_sin
theorem hasDerivAt_sin (x : ℝ) : HasDerivAt sin (cos x) x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_sin x).hasDerivAt
#align real.has_deriv_at_sin Real.hasDerivAt_sin
theorem contDiff_sin {n} : ContDiff ℝ n sin :=
Complex.contDiff_sin.real_of_complex
#align real.cont_diff_sin Real.contDiff_sin
theorem differentiable_sin : Differentiable ℝ sin := fun x => (hasDerivAt_sin x).differentiableAt
#align real.differentiable_sin Real.differentiable_sin
theorem differentiableAt_sin : DifferentiableAt ℝ sin x :=
differentiable_sin x
#align real.differentiable_at_sin Real.differentiableAt_sin
@[simp]
theorem deriv_sin : deriv sin = cos :=
funext fun x => (hasDerivAt_sin x).deriv
#align real.deriv_sin Real.deriv_sin
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_cos (x : ℝ) : HasStrictDerivAt cos (-sin x) x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cos x).real_of_complex
#align real.has_strict_deriv_at_cos Real.hasStrictDerivAt_cos
theorem hasDerivAt_cos (x : ℝ) : HasDerivAt cos (-sin x) x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_cos x).real_of_complex
#align real.has_deriv_at_cos Real.hasDerivAt_cos
theorem contDiff_cos {n} : ContDiff ℝ n cos :=
Complex.contDiff_cos.real_of_complex
#align real.cont_diff_cos Real.contDiff_cos
theorem differentiable_cos : Differentiable ℝ cos := fun x => (hasDerivAt_cos x).differentiableAt
#align real.differentiable_cos Real.differentiable_cos
theorem differentiableAt_cos : DifferentiableAt ℝ cos x :=
differentiable_cos x
#align real.differentiable_at_cos Real.differentiableAt_cos
theorem deriv_cos : deriv cos x = -sin x :=
(hasDerivAt_cos x).deriv
#align real.deriv_cos Real.deriv_cos
@[simp]
theorem deriv_cos' : deriv cos = fun x => -sin x :=
funext fun _ => deriv_cos
#align real.deriv_cos' Real.deriv_cos'
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_sinh (x : ℝ) : HasStrictDerivAt sinh (cosh x) x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_sinh x).real_of_complex
#align real.has_strict_deriv_at_sinh Real.hasStrictDerivAt_sinh
theorem hasDerivAt_sinh (x : ℝ) : HasDerivAt sinh (cosh x) x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_sinh x).real_of_complex
#align real.has_deriv_at_sinh Real.hasDerivAt_sinh
theorem contDiff_sinh {n} : ContDiff ℝ n sinh :=
Complex.contDiff_sinh.real_of_complex
#align real.cont_diff_sinh Real.contDiff_sinh
theorem differentiable_sinh : Differentiable ℝ sinh := fun x => (hasDerivAt_sinh x).differentiableAt
#align real.differentiable_sinh Real.differentiable_sinh
theorem differentiableAt_sinh : DifferentiableAt ℝ sinh x :=
differentiable_sinh x
#align real.differentiable_at_sinh Real.differentiableAt_sinh
@[simp]
theorem deriv_sinh : deriv sinh = cosh :=
funext fun x => (hasDerivAt_sinh x).deriv
#align real.deriv_sinh Real.deriv_sinh
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_cosh (x : ℝ) : HasStrictDerivAt cosh (sinh x) x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cosh x).real_of_complex
#align real.has_strict_deriv_at_cosh Real.hasStrictDerivAt_cosh
theorem hasDerivAt_cosh (x : ℝ) : HasDerivAt cosh (sinh x) x :=
(Complex.hasDerivAt_cosh x).real_of_complex
#align real.has_deriv_at_cosh Real.hasDerivAt_cosh
theorem contDiff_cosh {n} : ContDiff ℝ n cosh :=
Complex.contDiff_cosh.real_of_complex
#align real.cont_diff_cosh Real.contDiff_cosh
theorem differentiable_cosh : Differentiable ℝ cosh := fun x => (hasDerivAt_cosh x).differentiableAt
#align real.differentiable_cosh Real.differentiable_cosh
theorem differentiableAt_cosh : DifferentiableAt ℝ cosh x :=
differentiable_cosh x
#align real.differentiable_at_cosh Real.differentiableAt_cosh
@[simp]
theorem deriv_cosh : deriv cosh = sinh :=
funext fun x => (hasDerivAt_cosh x).deriv
#align real.deriv_cosh Real.deriv_cosh
/-- `sinh` is strictly monotone. -/
theorem sinh_strictMono : StrictMono sinh :=
strictMono_of_deriv_pos <| by rw [Real.deriv_sinh]; exact cosh_pos
#align real.sinh_strict_mono Real.sinh_strictMono
/-- `sinh` is injective, `∀ a b, sinh a = sinh b → a = b`. -/
theorem sinh_injective : Function.Injective sinh :=
sinh_strictMono.injective
#align real.sinh_injective Real.sinh_injective
@[simp]
theorem sinh_inj : sinh x = sinh y ↔ x = y :=
sinh_injective.eq_iff
#align real.sinh_inj Real.sinh_inj
@[simp]
theorem sinh_le_sinh : sinh x ≤ sinh y ↔ x ≤ y :=
sinh_strictMono.le_iff_le
#align real.sinh_le_sinh Real.sinh_le_sinh
@[simp]
theorem sinh_lt_sinh : sinh x < sinh y ↔ x < y :=
sinh_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
#align real.sinh_lt_sinh Real.sinh_lt_sinh
@[simp] lemma sinh_eq_zero : sinh x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by rw [← @sinh_inj x, sinh_zero]
lemma sinh_ne_zero : sinh x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := sinh_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
theorem sinh_pos_iff : 0 < sinh x ↔ 0 < x := by simpa only [sinh_zero] using @sinh_lt_sinh 0 x
#align real.sinh_pos_iff Real.sinh_pos_iff
@[simp]
theorem sinh_nonpos_iff : sinh x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 := by simpa only [sinh_zero] using @sinh_le_sinh x 0
#align real.sinh_nonpos_iff Real.sinh_nonpos_iff
@[simp]
theorem sinh_neg_iff : sinh x < 0 ↔ x < 0 := by simpa only [sinh_zero] using @sinh_lt_sinh x 0
#align real.sinh_neg_iff Real.sinh_neg_iff
@[simp]
theorem sinh_nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ sinh x ↔ 0 ≤ x := by simpa only [sinh_zero] using @sinh_le_sinh 0 x
#align real.sinh_nonneg_iff Real.sinh_nonneg_iff
theorem abs_sinh (x : ℝ) : |sinh x| = sinh |x| := by
cases le_total x 0 <;> simp [abs_of_nonneg, abs_of_nonpos, *]
#align real.abs_sinh Real.abs_sinh
theorem cosh_strictMonoOn : StrictMonoOn cosh (Ici 0) :=
strictMonoOn_of_deriv_pos (convex_Ici _) continuous_cosh.continuousOn fun x hx => by
rw [interior_Ici, mem_Ioi] at hx; rwa [deriv_cosh, sinh_pos_iff]
#align real.cosh_strict_mono_on Real.cosh_strictMonoOn
@[simp]
theorem cosh_le_cosh : cosh x ≤ cosh y ↔ |x| ≤ |y| :=
cosh_abs x ▸ cosh_abs y ▸ cosh_strictMonoOn.le_iff_le (abs_nonneg x) (abs_nonneg y)
#align real.cosh_le_cosh Real.cosh_le_cosh
@[simp]
theorem cosh_lt_cosh : cosh x < cosh y ↔ |x| < |y| :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le cosh_le_cosh
#align real.cosh_lt_cosh Real.cosh_lt_cosh
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cosh (x : ℝ) : 1 ≤ cosh x :=
cosh_zero ▸ cosh_le_cosh.2 (by simp only [_root_.abs_zero, _root_.abs_nonneg])
#align real.one_le_cosh Real.one_le_cosh
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_cosh : 1 < cosh x ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
cosh_zero ▸ cosh_lt_cosh.trans (by simp only [_root_.abs_zero, abs_pos])
#align real.one_lt_cosh Real.one_lt_cosh
theorem sinh_sub_id_strictMono : StrictMono fun x => sinh x - x := by
-- Porting note: `by simp; abel` was just `by simp` in mathlib3.
refine strictMono_of_odd_strictMonoOn_nonneg (fun x => by simp; abel) ?_
refine strictMonoOn_of_deriv_pos (convex_Ici _) ?_ fun x hx => ?_
· exact (continuous_sinh.sub continuous_id).continuousOn
· rw [interior_Ici, mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [deriv_sub, deriv_sinh, deriv_id'', sub_pos, one_lt_cosh]
exacts [hx.ne', differentiableAt_sinh, differentiableAt_id]
#align real.sinh_sub_id_strict_mono Real.sinh_sub_id_strictMono
@[simp]
theorem self_le_sinh_iff : x ≤ sinh x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
calc
x ≤ sinh x ↔ sinh 0 - 0 ≤ sinh x - x := by simp
_ ↔ 0 ≤ x := sinh_sub_id_strictMono.le_iff_le
#align real.self_le_sinh_iff Real.self_le_sinh_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Deriv.lean | 770 | 773 | theorem sinh_le_self_iff : sinh x ≤ x ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
calc
sinh x ≤ x ↔ sinh x - x ≤ sinh 0 - 0 := by | simp
_ ↔ x ≤ 0 := sinh_sub_id_strictMono.le_iff_le
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FundThmCalculus
#align_import analysis.special_functions.non_integrable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"55ec6e9af7d3e0043f57e394cb06a72f6275273e"
/-!
# Non integrable functions
In this file we prove that the derivative of a function that tends to infinity is not interval
integrable, see `not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter` and
`not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_punctured`. Then we apply the
latter lemma to prove that the function `fun x => x⁻¹` is integrable on `a..b` if and only if
`a = b` or `0 ∉ [a, b]`.
## Main results
* `not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_punctured`: if `f` tends to infinity
along `𝓝[≠] c` and `f' = O(g)` along the same filter, then `g` is not interval integrable on any
nontrivial integral `a..b`, `c ∈ [a, b]`.
* `not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter`: a version of
`not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_punctured` that works for one-sided
neighborhoods;
* `not_intervalIntegrable_of_sub_inv_isBigO_punctured`: if `1 / (x - c) = O(f)` as `x → c`, `x ≠ c`,
then `f` is not interval integrable on any nontrivial interval `a..b`, `c ∈ [a, b]`;
* `intervalIntegrable_sub_inv_iff`, `intervalIntegrable_inv_iff`: integrability conditions for
`(x - c)⁻¹` and `x⁻¹`.
## Tags
integrable function
-/
open scoped MeasureTheory Topology Interval NNReal ENNReal
open MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace Set Filter Asymptotics intervalIntegral
variable {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
/-- If `f` is eventually differentiable along a nontrivial filter `l : Filter ℝ` that is generated
by convex sets, the norm of `f` tends to infinity along `l`, and `f' = O(g)` along `l`, where `f'`
is the derivative of `f`, then `g` is not integrable on any set `k` belonging to `l`.
Auxiliary version assuming that `E` is complete. -/
theorem not_integrableOn_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter_aux
[CompleteSpace E] {f : ℝ → E} {g : ℝ → F}
{k : Set ℝ} (l : Filter ℝ) [NeBot l] [TendstoIxxClass Icc l l]
(hl : k ∈ l) (hd : ∀ᶠ x in l, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hf : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l atTop)
(hfg : deriv f =O[l] g) : ¬IntegrableOn g k := by
intro hgi
obtain ⟨C, hC₀, s, hsl, hsub, hfd, hg⟩ :
∃ (C : ℝ) (_ : 0 ≤ C), ∃ s ∈ l, (∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, [[x, y]] ⊆ k) ∧
(∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ∀ z ∈ [[x, y]], DifferentiableAt ℝ f z) ∧
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ∀ z ∈ [[x, y]], ‖deriv f z‖ ≤ C * ‖g z‖ := by
rcases hfg.exists_nonneg with ⟨C, C₀, hC⟩
have h : ∀ᶠ x : ℝ × ℝ in l.prod l,
∀ y ∈ [[x.1, x.2]], (DifferentiableAt ℝ f y ∧ ‖deriv f y‖ ≤ C * ‖g y‖) ∧ y ∈ k :=
(tendsto_fst.uIcc tendsto_snd).eventually ((hd.and hC.bound).and hl).smallSets
rcases mem_prod_self_iff.1 h with ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩
simp only [prod_subset_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hs
exact ⟨C, C₀, s, hsl, fun x hx y hy z hz => (hs x hx y hy z hz).2, fun x hx y hy z hz =>
(hs x hx y hy z hz).1.1, fun x hx y hy z hz => (hs x hx y hy z hz).1.2⟩
replace hgi : IntegrableOn (fun x ↦ C * ‖g x‖) k := by exact hgi.norm.smul C
obtain ⟨c, hc, d, hd, hlt⟩ : ∃ c ∈ s, ∃ d ∈ s, (‖f c‖ + ∫ y in k, C * ‖g y‖) < ‖f d‖ := by
rcases Filter.nonempty_of_mem hsl with ⟨c, hc⟩
have : ∀ᶠ x in l, (‖f c‖ + ∫ y in k, C * ‖g y‖) < ‖f x‖ :=
hf.eventually (eventually_gt_atTop _)
exact ⟨c, hc, (this.and hsl).exists.imp fun d hd => ⟨hd.2, hd.1⟩⟩
specialize hsub c hc d hd; specialize hfd c hc d hd
replace hg : ∀ x ∈ Ι c d, ‖deriv f x‖ ≤ C * ‖g x‖ :=
fun z hz => hg c hc d hd z ⟨hz.1.le, hz.2⟩
have hg_ae : ∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict (Ι c d), ‖deriv f x‖ ≤ C * ‖g x‖ :=
(ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_uIoc).mono hg
have hsub' : Ι c d ⊆ k := Subset.trans Ioc_subset_Icc_self hsub
have hfi : IntervalIntegrable (deriv f) volume c d := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff]
have : IntegrableOn (fun x ↦ C * ‖g x‖) (Ι c d) := IntegrableOn.mono hgi hsub' le_rfl
exact Integrable.mono' this (aestronglyMeasurable_deriv _ _) hg_ae
refine hlt.not_le (sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 ?_)
calc
‖f d‖ - ‖f c‖ ≤ ‖f d - f c‖ := norm_sub_norm_le _ _
_ = ‖∫ x in c..d, deriv f x‖ := congr_arg _ (integral_deriv_eq_sub hfd hfi).symm
_ = ‖∫ x in Ι c d, deriv f x‖ := norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc _
_ ≤ ∫ x in Ι c d, ‖deriv f x‖ := norm_integral_le_integral_norm _
_ ≤ ∫ x in Ι c d, C * ‖g x‖ :=
setIntegral_mono_on hfi.norm.def' (hgi.mono_set hsub') measurableSet_uIoc hg
_ ≤ ∫ x in k, C * ‖g x‖ := by
apply setIntegral_mono_set hgi
(ae_of_all _ fun x => mul_nonneg hC₀ (norm_nonneg _)) hsub'.eventuallyLE
theorem not_integrableOn_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter
{f : ℝ → E} {g : ℝ → F}
{k : Set ℝ} (l : Filter ℝ) [NeBot l] [TendstoIxxClass Icc l l]
(hl : k ∈ l) (hd : ∀ᶠ x in l, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hf : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l atTop)
(hfg : deriv f =O[l] g) : ¬IntegrableOn g k := by
let a : E →ₗᵢ[ℝ] UniformSpace.Completion E := UniformSpace.Completion.toComplₗᵢ
let f' := a ∘ f
have h'd : ∀ᶠ x in l, DifferentiableAt ℝ f' x := by
filter_upwards [hd] with x hx using a.toContinuousLinearMap.differentiableAt.comp x hx
have h'f : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f' x‖) l atTop := hf.congr (fun x ↦ by simp [f'])
have h'fg : deriv f' =O[l] g := by
apply IsBigO.trans _ hfg
rw [← isBigO_norm_norm]
suffices (fun x ↦ ‖deriv f' x‖) =ᶠ[l] (fun x ↦ ‖deriv f x‖) by exact this.isBigO
filter_upwards [hd] with x hx
have : deriv f' x = a (deriv f x) := by
rw [fderiv.comp_deriv x _ hx]
· have : fderiv ℝ a (f x) = a.toContinuousLinearMap := a.toContinuousLinearMap.fderiv
simp only [this]
rfl
· exact a.toContinuousLinearMap.differentiableAt
simp only [this]
simp
exact not_integrableOn_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter_aux l hl h'd h'f h'fg
/-- If `f` is eventually differentiable along a nontrivial filter `l : Filter ℝ` that is generated
by convex sets, the norm of `f` tends to infinity along `l`, and `f' = O(g)` along `l`, where `f'`
is the derivative of `f`, then `g` is not integrable on any interval `a..b` such that
`[a, b] ∈ l`. -/
theorem not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter {f : ℝ → E} {g : ℝ → F}
{a b : ℝ} (l : Filter ℝ) [NeBot l] [TendstoIxxClass Icc l l] (hl : [[a, b]] ∈ l)
(hd : ∀ᶠ x in l, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hf : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l atTop)
(hfg : deriv f =O[l] g) : ¬IntervalIntegrable g volume a b := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff']
exact not_integrableOn_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter _ hl hd hf hfg
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align not_interval_integrable_of_tendsto_norm_at_top_of_deriv_is_O_filter not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter
/-- If `a ≠ b`, `c ∈ [a, b]`, `f` is differentiable in the neighborhood of `c` within
`[a, b] \ {c}`, `‖f x‖ → ∞` as `x → c` within `[a, b] \ {c}`, and `f' = O(g)` along
`𝓝[[a, b] \ {c}] c`, where `f'` is the derivative of `f`, then `g` is not interval integrable on
`a..b`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/NonIntegrable.lean | 140 | 157 | theorem not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_within_diff_singleton
{f : ℝ → E} {g : ℝ → F} {a b c : ℝ} (hne : a ≠ b) (hc : c ∈ [[a, b]])
(h_deriv : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[[[a, b]] \ {c}] c, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x)
(h_infty : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) (𝓝[[[a, b]] \ {c}] c) atTop)
(hg : deriv f =O[𝓝[[[a, b]] \ {c}] c] g) : ¬IntervalIntegrable g volume a b := by |
obtain ⟨l, hl, hl', hle, hmem⟩ :
∃ l : Filter ℝ, TendstoIxxClass Icc l l ∧ l.NeBot ∧ l ≤ 𝓝 c ∧ [[a, b]] \ {c} ∈ l := by
cases' (min_lt_max.2 hne).lt_or_lt c with hlt hlt
· refine ⟨𝓝[<] c, inferInstance, inferInstance, inf_le_left, ?_⟩
rw [← Iic_diff_right]
exact diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff (Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic ⟨hlt, hc.2⟩) _
· refine ⟨𝓝[>] c, inferInstance, inferInstance, inf_le_left, ?_⟩
rw [← Ici_diff_left]
exact diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff (Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici ⟨hc.1, hlt⟩) _
have : l ≤ 𝓝[[[a, b]] \ {c}] c := le_inf hle (le_principal_iff.2 hmem)
exact not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter l
(mem_of_superset hmem diff_subset) (h_deriv.filter_mono this) (h_infty.mono_left this)
(hg.mono this)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa, Alex Meiburg
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
#align_import data.polynomial.erase_lead from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fa256f00ce018e7b40e1dc756e403c86680bf448"
/-!
# Erase the leading term of a univariate polynomial
## Definition
* `eraseLead f`: the polynomial `f - leading term of f`
`eraseLead` serves as reduction step in an induction, shaving off one monomial from a polynomial.
The definition is set up so that it does not mention subtraction in the definition,
and thus works for polynomials over semirings as well as rings.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Polynomial Finset
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {f : R[X]}
/-- `eraseLead f` for a polynomial `f` is the polynomial obtained by
subtracting from `f` the leading term of `f`. -/
def eraseLead (f : R[X]) : R[X] :=
Polynomial.erase f.natDegree f
#align polynomial.erase_lead Polynomial.eraseLead
section EraseLead
theorem eraseLead_support (f : R[X]) : f.eraseLead.support = f.support.erase f.natDegree := by
simp only [eraseLead, support_erase]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_support Polynomial.eraseLead_support
theorem eraseLead_coeff (i : ℕ) :
f.eraseLead.coeff i = if i = f.natDegree then 0 else f.coeff i := by
simp only [eraseLead, coeff_erase]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_coeff Polynomial.eraseLead_coeff
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_coeff_natDegree : f.eraseLead.coeff f.natDegree = 0 := by simp [eraseLead_coeff]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_coeff_nat_degree Polynomial.eraseLead_coeff_natDegree
theorem eraseLead_coeff_of_ne (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≠ f.natDegree) : f.eraseLead.coeff i = f.coeff i := by
simp [eraseLead_coeff, hi]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_coeff_of_ne Polynomial.eraseLead_coeff_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_zero : eraseLead (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by simp only [eraseLead, erase_zero]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_zero Polynomial.eraseLead_zero
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff (f : R[X]) :
f.eraseLead + monomial f.natDegree f.leadingCoeff = f :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (f.monomial_add_erase _)
#align polynomial.erase_lead_add_monomial_nat_degree_leading_coeff Polynomial.eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow (f : R[X]) :
f.eraseLead + C f.leadingCoeff * X ^ f.natDegree = f := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.erase_lead_add_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff {R : Type*} [Ring R] (f : R[X]) :
f - monomial f.natDegree f.leadingCoeff = f.eraseLead :=
(eq_sub_iff_add_eq.mpr (eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff f)).symm
#align polynomial.self_sub_monomial_nat_degree_leading_coeff Polynomial.self_sub_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_C_mul_X_pow {R : Type*} [Ring R] (f : R[X]) :
f - C f.leadingCoeff * X ^ f.natDegree = f.eraseLead := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, self_sub_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.self_sub_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.self_sub_C_mul_X_pow
theorem eraseLead_ne_zero (f0 : 2 ≤ f.support.card) : eraseLead f ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, ← card_support_eq_zero, eraseLead_support]
exact
(zero_lt_one.trans_le <| (tsub_le_tsub_right f0 1).trans Finset.pred_card_le_card_erase).ne.symm
#align polynomial.erase_lead_ne_zero Polynomial.eraseLead_ne_zero
theorem lt_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support {a : ℕ} (h : a ∈ (eraseLead f).support) :
a < f.natDegree := by
rw [eraseLead_support, mem_erase] at h
exact (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp a h.2).lt_of_ne h.1
#align polynomial.lt_nat_degree_of_mem_erase_lead_support Polynomial.lt_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support
theorem ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support {a : ℕ} (h : a ∈ (eraseLead f).support) :
a ≠ f.natDegree :=
(lt_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support h).ne
#align polynomial.ne_nat_degree_of_mem_erase_lead_support Polynomial.ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support
theorem natDegree_not_mem_eraseLead_support : f.natDegree ∉ (eraseLead f).support := fun h =>
ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support h rfl
#align polynomial.nat_degree_not_mem_erase_lead_support Polynomial.natDegree_not_mem_eraseLead_support
theorem eraseLead_support_card_lt (h : f ≠ 0) : (eraseLead f).support.card < f.support.card := by
rw [eraseLead_support]
exact card_lt_card (erase_ssubset <| natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero h)
#align polynomial.erase_lead_support_card_lt Polynomial.eraseLead_support_card_lt
theorem card_support_eraseLead_add_one (h : f ≠ 0) :
f.eraseLead.support.card + 1 = f.support.card := by
set c := f.support.card with hc
cases h₁ : c
case zero =>
by_contra
exact h (card_support_eq_zero.mp h₁)
case succ =>
rw [eraseLead_support, card_erase_of_mem (natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero h), ← hc, h₁]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_support_eraseLead : f.eraseLead.support.card = f.support.card - 1 := by
by_cases hf : f = 0
· rw [hf, eraseLead_zero, support_zero, card_empty]
· rw [← card_support_eraseLead_add_one hf, add_tsub_cancel_right]
theorem card_support_eraseLead' {c : ℕ} (fc : f.support.card = c + 1) :
f.eraseLead.support.card = c := by
rw [card_support_eraseLead, fc, add_tsub_cancel_right]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_card_support' Polynomial.card_support_eraseLead'
theorem card_support_eq_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero (h₀ : f ≠ 0) (h₁ : f.eraseLead = 0) :
f.support.card = 1 :=
(card_support_eq_zero.mpr h₁ ▸ card_support_eraseLead_add_one h₀).symm
theorem card_support_le_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero (h : f.eraseLead = 0) : f.support.card ≤ 1 := by
by_cases hpz : f = 0
case pos => simp [hpz]
case neg => exact le_of_eq (card_support_eq_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero hpz h)
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_monomial (i : ℕ) (r : R) : eraseLead (monomial i r) = 0 := by
classical
by_cases hr : r = 0
· subst r
simp only [monomial_zero_right, eraseLead_zero]
· rw [eraseLead, natDegree_monomial, if_neg hr, erase_monomial]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_monomial Polynomial.eraseLead_monomial
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_C (r : R) : eraseLead (C r) = 0 :=
eraseLead_monomial _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.erase_lead_C Polynomial.eraseLead_C
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_X : eraseLead (X : R[X]) = 0 :=
eraseLead_monomial _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.erase_lead_X Polynomial.eraseLead_X
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_X_pow (n : ℕ) : eraseLead (X ^ n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, eraseLead_monomial]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.erase_lead_X_pow Polynomial.eraseLead_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_C_mul_X_pow (r : R) (n : ℕ) : eraseLead (C r * X ^ n) = 0 := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, eraseLead_monomial]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.erase_lead_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.eraseLead_C_mul_X_pow
@[simp] lemma eraseLead_C_mul_X (r : R) : eraseLead (C r * X) = 0 := by
simpa using eraseLead_C_mul_X_pow _ 1
theorem eraseLead_add_of_natDegree_lt_left {p q : R[X]} (pq : q.natDegree < p.natDegree) :
(p + q).eraseLead = p.eraseLead + q := by
ext n
by_cases nd : n = p.natDegree
· rw [nd, eraseLead_coeff, if_pos (natDegree_add_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt pq).symm]
simpa using (coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt pq).symm
· rw [eraseLead_coeff, coeff_add, coeff_add, eraseLead_coeff, if_neg, if_neg nd]
rintro rfl
exact nd (natDegree_add_eq_left_of_natDegree_lt pq)
#align polynomial.erase_lead_add_of_nat_degree_lt_left Polynomial.eraseLead_add_of_natDegree_lt_left
theorem eraseLead_add_of_natDegree_lt_right {p q : R[X]} (pq : p.natDegree < q.natDegree) :
(p + q).eraseLead = p + q.eraseLead := by
ext n
by_cases nd : n = q.natDegree
· rw [nd, eraseLead_coeff, if_pos (natDegree_add_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt pq).symm]
simpa using (coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt pq).symm
· rw [eraseLead_coeff, coeff_add, coeff_add, eraseLead_coeff, if_neg, if_neg nd]
rintro rfl
exact nd (natDegree_add_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt pq)
#align polynomial.erase_lead_add_of_nat_degree_lt_right Polynomial.eraseLead_add_of_natDegree_lt_right
theorem eraseLead_degree_le : (eraseLead f).degree ≤ f.degree :=
f.degree_erase_le _
#align polynomial.erase_lead_degree_le Polynomial.eraseLead_degree_le
theorem eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux : (eraseLead f).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree :=
natDegree_le_natDegree eraseLead_degree_le
#align polynomial.erase_lead_nat_degree_le_aux Polynomial.eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux
theorem eraseLead_natDegree_lt (f0 : 2 ≤ f.support.card) : (eraseLead f).natDegree < f.natDegree :=
lt_of_le_of_ne eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux <|
ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support <|
natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero <| eraseLead_ne_zero f0
#align polynomial.erase_lead_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.eraseLead_natDegree_lt
theorem natDegree_pos_of_eraseLead_ne_zero (h : f.eraseLead ≠ 0) : 0 < f.natDegree := by
by_contra h₂
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero (Nat.eq_zero_of_not_pos h₂)] at h
simp at h
theorem eraseLead_natDegree_lt_or_eraseLead_eq_zero (f : R[X]) :
(eraseLead f).natDegree < f.natDegree ∨ f.eraseLead = 0 := by
by_cases h : f.support.card ≤ 1
· right
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_self h]
simp
· left
apply eraseLead_natDegree_lt (lt_of_not_ge h)
#align polynomial.erase_lead_nat_degree_lt_or_erase_lead_eq_zero Polynomial.eraseLead_natDegree_lt_or_eraseLead_eq_zero
theorem eraseLead_natDegree_le (f : R[X]) : (eraseLead f).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree - 1 := by
rcases f.eraseLead_natDegree_lt_or_eraseLead_eq_zero with (h | h)
· exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt h
· simp only [h, natDegree_zero, zero_le]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_nat_degree_le Polynomial.eraseLead_natDegree_le
lemma natDegree_eraseLead (h : f.nextCoeff ≠ 0) : f.eraseLead.natDegree = f.natDegree - 1 := by
have := natDegree_pos_of_nextCoeff_ne_zero h
refine f.eraseLead_natDegree_le.antisymm $ le_natDegree_of_ne_zero ?_
rwa [eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (tsub_lt_self _ _).ne, ← nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos]
all_goals positivity
lemma natDegree_eraseLead_add_one (h : f.nextCoeff ≠ 0) :
f.eraseLead.natDegree + 1 = f.natDegree := by
rw [natDegree_eraseLead h, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
exact natDegree_pos_of_nextCoeff_ne_zero h
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/EraseLead.lean | 250 | 257 | theorem natDegree_eraseLead_le_of_nextCoeff_eq_zero (h : f.nextCoeff = 0) :
f.eraseLead.natDegree ≤ f.natDegree - 2 := by |
refine natDegree_le_pred (n := f.natDegree - 1) (eraseLead_natDegree_le f) ?_
rw [nextCoeff_eq_zero, natDegree_eq_zero] at h
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ | ⟨hf, h⟩ := h
· simp
rw [eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (tsub_lt_self hf zero_lt_one).ne, ← nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos hf]
simp [nextCoeff_eq_zero, h, eq_zero_or_pos]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Canonical
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.Set.List
import Mathlib.Init.Quot
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
#align_import data.multiset.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Multisets
These are implemented as the quotient of a list by permutations.
## Notation
We define the global infix notation `::ₘ` for `Multiset.cons`.
-/
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
/-- `Multiset α` is the quotient of `List α` by list permutation. The result
is a type of finite sets with duplicates allowed. -/
def Multiset.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u :=
Quotient (List.isSetoid α)
#align multiset Multiset
namespace Multiset
-- Porting note: new
/-- The quotient map from `List α` to `Multiset α`. -/
@[coe]
def ofList : List α → Multiset α :=
Quot.mk _
instance : Coe (List α) (Multiset α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) ⟦l⟧ l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe' (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) (Quot.mk (· ≈ ·) l) l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe' Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe'
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe'' (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) (Quot.mk Setoid.r l) l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe'' Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe''
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_coe {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Multiset α) = l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ :=
Quotient.eq
#align multiset.coe_eq_coe Multiset.coe_eq_coe
-- Porting note: new instance;
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: move to better place
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ ≈ l₂) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (l₁ ~ l₂))
-- Porting note: `Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ s₁ s₂` was in parens which broke elaboration
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Multiset α)
| s₁, s₂ => Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff' _ Quotient.eq
#align multiset.has_decidable_eq Multiset.decidableEq
/-- defines a size for a multiset by referring to the size of the underlying list -/
protected
def sizeOf [SizeOf α] (s : Multiset α) : ℕ :=
(Quot.liftOn s SizeOf.sizeOf) fun _ _ => Perm.sizeOf_eq_sizeOf
#align multiset.sizeof Multiset.sizeOf
instance [SizeOf α] : SizeOf (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.sizeOf⟩
/-! ### Empty multiset -/
/-- `0 : Multiset α` is the empty set -/
protected def zero : Multiset α :=
@nil α
#align multiset.zero Multiset.zero
instance : Zero (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.zero⟩
instance : EmptyCollection (Multiset α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance inhabitedMultiset : Inhabited (Multiset α) :=
⟨0⟩
#align multiset.inhabited_multiset Multiset.inhabitedMultiset
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Multiset α) where
default := 0
uniq := by rintro ⟨_ | ⟨a, l⟩⟩; exacts [rfl, isEmptyElim a]
@[simp]
theorem coe_nil : (@nil α : Multiset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_nil Multiset.coe_nil
@[simp]
theorem empty_eq_zero : (∅ : Multiset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.empty_eq_zero Multiset.empty_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_zero (l : List α) : (l : Multiset α) = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
Iff.trans coe_eq_coe perm_nil
#align multiset.coe_eq_zero Multiset.coe_eq_zero
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty (l : List α) : (l : Multiset α) = 0 ↔ l.isEmpty :=
Iff.trans (coe_eq_zero l) isEmpty_iff_eq_nil.symm
#align multiset.coe_eq_zero_iff_empty Multiset.coe_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty
/-! ### `Multiset.cons` -/
/-- `cons a s` is the multiset which contains `s` plus one more instance of `a`. -/
def cons (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (a :: l : Multiset α)) fun _ _ p => Quot.sound (p.cons a)
#align multiset.cons Multiset.cons
@[inherit_doc Multiset.cons]
infixr:67 " ::ₘ " => Multiset.cons
instance : Insert α (Multiset α) :=
⟨cons⟩
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_cons (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : insert a s = a ::ₘ s :=
rfl
#align multiset.insert_eq_cons Multiset.insert_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_coe (a : α) (l : List α) : (a ::ₘ l : Multiset α) = (a :: l : List α) :=
rfl
#align multiset.cons_coe Multiset.cons_coe
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj_left {a b : α} (s : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ s = b ::ₘ s ↔ a = b :=
⟨Quot.inductionOn s fun l e =>
have : [a] ++ l ~ [b] ++ l := Quotient.exact e
singleton_perm_singleton.1 <| (perm_append_right_iff _).1 this,
congr_arg (· ::ₘ _)⟩
#align multiset.cons_inj_left Multiset.cons_inj_left
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj_right (a : α) : ∀ {s t : Multiset α}, a ::ₘ s = a ::ₘ t ↔ s = t := by
rintro ⟨l₁⟩ ⟨l₂⟩; simp
#align multiset.cons_inj_right Multiset.cons_inj_right
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction {p : Multiset α → Prop} (empty : p 0)
(cons : ∀ (a : α) (s : Multiset α), p s → p (a ::ₘ s)) : ∀ s, p s := by
rintro ⟨l⟩; induction' l with _ _ ih <;> [exact empty; exact cons _ _ ih]
#align multiset.induction Multiset.induction
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (empty : p 0)
(cons : ∀ (a : α) (s : Multiset α), p s → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.induction empty cons s
#align multiset.induction_on Multiset.induction_on
theorem cons_swap (a b : α) (s : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ b ::ₘ s = b ::ₘ a ::ₘ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => Quotient.sound <| Perm.swap _ _ _
#align multiset.cons_swap Multiset.cons_swap
section Rec
variable {C : Multiset α → Sort*}
/-- Dependent recursor on multisets.
TODO: should be @[recursor 6], but then the definition of `Multiset.pi` fails with a stack
overflow in `whnf`.
-/
protected
def rec (C_0 : C 0) (C_cons : ∀ a m, C m → C (a ::ₘ m))
(C_cons_heq :
∀ a a' m b, HEq (C_cons a (a' ::ₘ m) (C_cons a' m b)) (C_cons a' (a ::ₘ m) (C_cons a m b)))
(m : Multiset α) : C m :=
Quotient.hrecOn m (@List.rec α (fun l => C ⟦l⟧) C_0 fun a l b => C_cons a ⟦l⟧ b) fun l l' h =>
h.rec_heq
(fun hl _ ↦ by congr 1; exact Quot.sound hl)
(C_cons_heq _ _ ⟦_⟧ _)
#align multiset.rec Multiset.rec
/-- Companion to `Multiset.rec` with more convenient argument order. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected
def recOn (m : Multiset α) (C_0 : C 0) (C_cons : ∀ a m, C m → C (a ::ₘ m))
(C_cons_heq :
∀ a a' m b, HEq (C_cons a (a' ::ₘ m) (C_cons a' m b)) (C_cons a' (a ::ₘ m) (C_cons a m b))) :
C m :=
Multiset.rec C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq m
#align multiset.rec_on Multiset.recOn
variable {C_0 : C 0} {C_cons : ∀ a m, C m → C (a ::ₘ m)}
{C_cons_heq :
∀ a a' m b, HEq (C_cons a (a' ::ₘ m) (C_cons a' m b)) (C_cons a' (a ::ₘ m) (C_cons a m b))}
@[simp]
theorem recOn_0 : @Multiset.recOn α C (0 : Multiset α) C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq = C_0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.rec_on_0 Multiset.recOn_0
@[simp]
theorem recOn_cons (a : α) (m : Multiset α) :
(a ::ₘ m).recOn C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq = C_cons a m (m.recOn C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq) :=
Quotient.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
#align multiset.rec_on_cons Multiset.recOn_cons
end Rec
section Mem
/-- `a ∈ s` means that `a` has nonzero multiplicity in `s`. -/
def Mem (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => a ∈ l) fun l₁ l₂ (e : l₁ ~ l₂) => propext <| e.mem_iff
#align multiset.mem Multiset.Mem
instance : Membership α (Multiset α) :=
⟨Mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ (l : Multiset α) ↔ a ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.mem_coe Multiset.mem_coe
instance decidableMem [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton' s fun l ↦ inferInstanceAs (Decidable (a ∈ l))
#align multiset.decidable_mem Multiset.decidableMem
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ b ::ₘ s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => List.mem_cons
#align multiset.mem_cons Multiset.mem_cons
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ b ::ₘ s :=
mem_cons.2 <| Or.inr h
#align multiset.mem_cons_of_mem Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : a ∈ a ::ₘ s :=
mem_cons.2 (Or.inl rfl)
#align multiset.mem_cons_self Multiset.mem_cons_self
theorem forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Multiset α} :
(∀ x ∈ a ::ₘ s, p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, p x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun _ => List.forall_mem_cons
#align multiset.forall_mem_cons Multiset.forall_mem_cons
theorem exists_cons_of_mem {s : Multiset α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → ∃ t, s = a ::ₘ t :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l (h : a ∈ l) =>
let ⟨l₁, l₂, e⟩ := append_of_mem h
e.symm ▸ ⟨(l₁ ++ l₂ : List α), Quot.sound perm_middle⟩
#align multiset.exists_cons_of_mem Multiset.exists_cons_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_zero (a : α) : a ∉ (0 : Multiset α) :=
List.not_mem_nil _
#align multiset.not_mem_zero Multiset.not_mem_zero
theorem eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem {s : Multiset α} : (∀ x, x ∉ s) → s = 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l H => by rw [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr H]; rfl
#align multiset.eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem Multiset.eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Multiset α} : s = 0 ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ s :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ fun _ => not_mem_zero _, eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem⟩
#align multiset.eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem Multiset.eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem
theorem exists_mem_of_ne_zero {s : Multiset α} : s ≠ 0 → ∃ a : α, a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l hl =>
match l, hl with
| [], h => False.elim <| h rfl
| a :: l, _ => ⟨a, by simp⟩
#align multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero Multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero
theorem empty_or_exists_mem (s : Multiset α) : s = 0 ∨ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr Multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero
#align multiset.empty_or_exists_mem Multiset.empty_or_exists_mem
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_cons {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : 0 ≠ a ::ₘ m := fun h =>
have : a ∈ (0 : Multiset α) := h.symm ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
not_mem_zero _ this
#align multiset.zero_ne_cons Multiset.zero_ne_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_ne_zero {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : a ::ₘ m ≠ 0 :=
zero_ne_cons.symm
#align multiset.cons_ne_zero Multiset.cons_ne_zero
theorem cons_eq_cons {a b : α} {as bs : Multiset α} :
a ::ₘ as = b ::ₘ bs ↔ a = b ∧ as = bs ∨ a ≠ b ∧ ∃ cs, as = b ::ₘ cs ∧ bs = a ::ₘ cs := by
haveI : DecidableEq α := Classical.decEq α
constructor
· intro eq
by_cases h : a = b
· subst h
simp_all
· have : a ∈ b ::ₘ bs := eq ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
have : a ∈ bs := by simpa [h]
rcases exists_cons_of_mem this with ⟨cs, hcs⟩
simp only [h, hcs, false_and, ne_eq, not_false_eq_true, cons_inj_right, exists_eq_right',
true_and, false_or]
have : a ::ₘ as = b ::ₘ a ::ₘ cs := by simp [eq, hcs]
have : a ::ₘ as = a ::ₘ b ::ₘ cs := by rwa [cons_swap]
simpa using this
· intro h
rcases h with (⟨eq₁, eq₂⟩ | ⟨_, cs, eq₁, eq₂⟩)
· simp [*]
· simp [*, cons_swap a b]
#align multiset.cons_eq_cons Multiset.cons_eq_cons
end Mem
/-! ### Singleton -/
instance : Singleton α (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun a => a ::ₘ 0⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton α (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_zero (a : α) : a ::ₘ 0 = {a} :=
rfl
#align multiset.cons_zero Multiset.cons_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_singleton (a : α) : ([a] : Multiset α) = {a} :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_singleton Multiset.coe_singleton
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ ({a} : Multiset α) ↔ b = a := by
simp only [← cons_zero, mem_cons, iff_self_iff, or_false_iff, not_mem_zero]
#align multiset.mem_singleton Multiset.mem_singleton
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Multiset α) := by
rw [← cons_zero]
exact mem_cons_self _ _
#align multiset.mem_singleton_self Multiset.mem_singleton_self
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : ({a} : Multiset α) = {b} ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [← cons_zero]
exact cons_inj_left _
#align multiset.singleton_inj Multiset.singleton_inj
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : (l : Multiset α) = {a} ↔ l = [a] := by
rw [← coe_singleton, coe_eq_coe, List.perm_singleton]
#align multiset.coe_eq_singleton Multiset.coe_eq_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_cons_iff {a b : α} (m : Multiset α) : {a} = b ::ₘ m ↔ a = b ∧ m = 0 := by
rw [← cons_zero, cons_eq_cons]
simp [eq_comm]
#align multiset.singleton_eq_cons_iff Multiset.singleton_eq_cons_iff
theorem pair_comm (x y : α) : ({x, y} : Multiset α) = {y, x} :=
cons_swap x y 0
#align multiset.pair_comm Multiset.pair_comm
/-! ### `Multiset.Subset` -/
section Subset
variable {s : Multiset α} {a : α}
/-- `s ⊆ t` is the lift of the list subset relation. It means that any
element with nonzero multiplicity in `s` has nonzero multiplicity in `t`,
but it does not imply that the multiplicity of `a` in `s` is less or equal than in `t`;
see `s ≤ t` for this relation. -/
protected def Subset (s t : Multiset α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t
#align multiset.subset Multiset.Subset
instance : HasSubset (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.Subset⟩
instance : HasSSubset (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s⟩
instance instIsNonstrictStrictOrder : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Multiset α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) where
right_iff_left_not_left _ _ := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Multiset α) ⊆ l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.coe_subset Multiset.coe_subset
@[simp]
theorem Subset.refl (s : Multiset α) : s ⊆ s := fun _ h => h
#align multiset.subset.refl Multiset.Subset.refl
theorem Subset.trans {s t u : Multiset α} : s ⊆ t → t ⊆ u → s ⊆ u := fun h₁ h₂ _ m => h₂ (h₁ m)
#align multiset.subset.trans Multiset.Subset.trans
theorem subset_iff {s t : Multiset α} : s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.subset_iff Multiset.subset_iff
theorem mem_of_subset {s t : Multiset α} {a : α} (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∈ s → a ∈ t :=
@h _
#align multiset.mem_of_subset Multiset.mem_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem zero_subset (s : Multiset α) : 0 ⊆ s := fun a => (not_mem_nil a).elim
#align multiset.zero_subset Multiset.zero_subset
theorem subset_cons (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : s ⊆ a ::ₘ s := fun _ => mem_cons_of_mem
#align multiset.subset_cons Multiset.subset_cons
theorem ssubset_cons {s : Multiset α} {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ a ::ₘ s :=
⟨subset_cons _ _, fun h => ha <| h <| mem_cons_self _ _⟩
#align multiset.ssubset_cons Multiset.ssubset_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_subset {a : α} {s t : Multiset α} : a ::ₘ s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
simp [subset_iff, or_imp, forall_and]
#align multiset.cons_subset Multiset.cons_subset
theorem cons_subset_cons {a : α} {s t : Multiset α} : s ⊆ t → a ::ₘ s ⊆ a ::ₘ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _ _ => List.cons_subset_cons _
#align multiset.cons_subset_cons Multiset.cons_subset_cons
theorem eq_zero_of_subset_zero {s : Multiset α} (h : s ⊆ 0) : s = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem fun _ hx ↦ not_mem_zero _ (h hx)
#align multiset.eq_zero_of_subset_zero Multiset.eq_zero_of_subset_zero
@[simp] lemma subset_zero : s ⊆ 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
⟨eq_zero_of_subset_zero, fun xeq => xeq.symm ▸ Subset.refl 0⟩
#align multiset.subset_zero Multiset.subset_zero
@[simp] lemma zero_ssubset : 0 ⊂ s ↔ s ≠ 0 := by simp [ssubset_iff_subset_not_subset]
@[simp] lemma singleton_subset : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s := by simp [subset_iff]
theorem induction_on' {p : Multiset α → Prop} (S : Multiset α) (h₁ : p 0)
(h₂ : ∀ {a s}, a ∈ S → s ⊆ S → p s → p (insert a s)) : p S :=
@Multiset.induction_on α (fun T => T ⊆ S → p T) S (fun _ => h₁)
(fun _ _ hps hs =>
let ⟨hS, sS⟩ := cons_subset.1 hs
h₂ hS sS (hps sS))
(Subset.refl S)
#align multiset.induction_on' Multiset.induction_on'
end Subset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out'
#align multiset.to_list Multiset.toList
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
#align multiset.coe_to_list Multiset.coe_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
#align multiset.to_list_eq_nil Multiset.toList_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 :=
isEmpty_iff_eq_nil.trans toList_eq_nil
#align multiset.empty_to_list Multiset.empty_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
#align multiset.to_list_zero Multiset.toList_zero
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
#align multiset.mem_to_list Multiset.mem_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
#align multiset.to_list_eq_singleton_iff Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
#align multiset.to_list_singleton Multiset.toList_singleton
end ToList
/-! ### Partial order on `Multiset`s -/
/-- `s ≤ t` means that `s` is a sublist of `t` (up to permutation).
Equivalently, `s ≤ t` means that `count a s ≤ count a t` for all `a`. -/
protected def Le (s t : Multiset α) : Prop :=
(Quotient.liftOn₂ s t (· <+~ ·)) fun _ _ _ _ p₁ p₂ =>
propext (p₂.subperm_left.trans p₁.subperm_right)
#align multiset.le Multiset.Le
instance : PartialOrder (Multiset α) where
le := Multiset.Le
le_refl := by rintro ⟨l⟩; exact Subperm.refl _
le_trans := by rintro ⟨l₁⟩ ⟨l₂⟩ ⟨l₃⟩; exact @Subperm.trans _ _ _ _
le_antisymm := by rintro ⟨l₁⟩ ⟨l₂⟩ h₁ h₂; exact Quot.sound (Subperm.antisymm h₁ h₂)
instance decidableLE [DecidableEq α] : DecidableRel ((· ≤ ·) : Multiset α → Multiset α → Prop) :=
fun s t => Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ s t List.decidableSubperm
#align multiset.decidable_le Multiset.decidableLE
section
variable {s t : Multiset α} {a : α}
theorem subset_of_le : s ≤ t → s ⊆ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _ _ => Subperm.subset
#align multiset.subset_of_le Multiset.subset_of_le
alias Le.subset := subset_of_le
#align multiset.le.subset Multiset.Le.subset
theorem mem_of_le (h : s ≤ t) : a ∈ s → a ∈ t :=
mem_of_subset (subset_of_le h)
#align multiset.mem_of_le Multiset.mem_of_le
theorem not_mem_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| @h _
#align multiset.not_mem_mono Multiset.not_mem_mono
@[simp]
theorem coe_le {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Multiset α) ≤ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.coe_le Multiset.coe_le
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem leInductionOn {C : Multiset α → Multiset α → Prop} {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t)
(H : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → C l₁ l₂) : C s t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t (fun l₁ _ ⟨l, p, s⟩ => (show ⟦l⟧ = ⟦l₁⟧ from Quot.sound p) ▸ H s) h
#align multiset.le_induction_on Multiset.leInductionOn
theorem zero_le (s : Multiset α) : 0 ≤ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => (nil_sublist l).subperm
#align multiset.zero_le Multiset.zero_le
instance : OrderBot (Multiset α) where
bot := 0
bot_le := zero_le
/-- This is a `rfl` and `simp` version of `bot_eq_zero`. -/
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Multiset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.bot_eq_zero Multiset.bot_eq_zero
theorem le_zero : s ≤ 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
le_bot_iff
#align multiset.le_zero Multiset.le_zero
theorem lt_cons_self (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : s < a ::ₘ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l =>
suffices l <+~ a :: l ∧ ¬l ~ a :: l by simpa [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
⟨(sublist_cons _ _).subperm, fun p => _root_.ne_of_lt (lt_succ_self (length l)) p.length_eq⟩
#align multiset.lt_cons_self Multiset.lt_cons_self
theorem le_cons_self (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : s ≤ a ::ₘ s :=
le_of_lt <| lt_cons_self _ _
#align multiset.le_cons_self Multiset.le_cons_self
theorem cons_le_cons_iff (a : α) : a ::ₘ s ≤ a ::ₘ t ↔ s ≤ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _ _ => subperm_cons a
#align multiset.cons_le_cons_iff Multiset.cons_le_cons_iff
theorem cons_le_cons (a : α) : s ≤ t → a ::ₘ s ≤ a ::ₘ t :=
(cons_le_cons_iff a).2
#align multiset.cons_le_cons Multiset.cons_le_cons
@[simp] lemma cons_lt_cons_iff : a ::ₘ s < a ::ₘ t ↔ s < t :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' (cons_le_cons_iff _) (cons_le_cons_iff _)
lemma cons_lt_cons (a : α) (h : s < t) : a ::ₘ s < a ::ₘ t := cons_lt_cons_iff.2 h
theorem le_cons_of_not_mem (m : a ∉ s) : s ≤ a ::ₘ t ↔ s ≤ t := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => le_trans h <| le_cons_self _ _⟩
suffices ∀ {t'}, s ≤ t' → a ∈ t' → a ::ₘ s ≤ t' by
exact fun h => (cons_le_cons_iff a).1 (this h (mem_cons_self _ _))
introv h
revert m
refine leInductionOn h ?_
introv s m₁ m₂
rcases append_of_mem m₂ with ⟨r₁, r₂, rfl⟩
exact
perm_middle.subperm_left.2
((subperm_cons _).2 <| ((sublist_or_mem_of_sublist s).resolve_right m₁).subperm)
#align multiset.le_cons_of_not_mem Multiset.le_cons_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_zero (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α) ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (lt_cons_self _ _)
#align multiset.singleton_ne_zero Multiset.singleton_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem singleton_le {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : {a} ≤ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => mem_of_le h (mem_singleton_self _), fun h =>
let ⟨_t, e⟩ := exists_cons_of_mem h
e.symm ▸ cons_le_cons _ (zero_le _)⟩
#align multiset.singleton_le Multiset.singleton_le
@[simp] lemma le_singleton : s ≤ {a} ↔ s = 0 ∨ s = {a} :=
Quot.induction_on s fun l ↦ by simp only [cons_zero, ← coe_singleton, quot_mk_to_coe'', coe_le,
coe_eq_zero, coe_eq_coe, perm_singleton, subperm_singleton_iff]
@[simp] lemma lt_singleton : s < {a} ↔ s = 0 := by
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_singleton, or_and_right, Ne, and_not_self, or_false,
and_iff_left_iff_imp]
rintro rfl
exact (singleton_ne_zero _).symm
@[simp] lemma ssubset_singleton_iff : s ⊂ {a} ↔ s = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hs ↦ eq_zero_of_subset_zero fun b hb ↦ (hs.2 ?_).elim, ?_⟩
· obtain rfl := mem_singleton.1 (hs.1 hb)
rwa [singleton_subset]
· rintro rfl
simp
end
/-! ### Additive monoid -/
/-- The sum of two multisets is the lift of the list append operation.
This adds the multiplicities of each element,
i.e. `count a (s + t) = count a s + count a t`. -/
protected def add (s₁ s₂ : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
(Quotient.liftOn₂ s₁ s₂ fun l₁ l₂ => ((l₁ ++ l₂ : List α) : Multiset α)) fun _ _ _ _ p₁ p₂ =>
Quot.sound <| p₁.append p₂
#align multiset.add Multiset.add
instance : Add (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.add⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (s t : List α) : (s + t : Multiset α) = (s ++ t : List α) :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_add Multiset.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem singleton_add (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : {a} + s = a ::ₘ s :=
rfl
#align multiset.singleton_add Multiset.singleton_add
private theorem add_le_add_iff_left' {s t u : Multiset α} : s + t ≤ s + u ↔ t ≤ u :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ s t u fun _ _ _ => subperm_append_left _
instance : CovariantClass (Multiset α) (Multiset α) (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _s _t _u => add_le_add_iff_left'.2⟩
instance : ContravariantClass (Multiset α) (Multiset α) (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _s _t _u => add_le_add_iff_left'.1⟩
instance : OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid (Multiset α) where
zero := 0
add := (· + ·)
add_comm := fun s t => Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun l₁ l₂ => Quot.sound perm_append_comm
add_assoc := fun s₁ s₂ s₃ =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ s₁ s₂ s₃ fun l₁ l₂ l₃ => congr_arg _ <| append_assoc l₁ l₂ l₃
zero_add := fun s => Quot.inductionOn s fun l => rfl
add_zero := fun s => Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| append_nil l
add_le_add_left := fun s₁ s₂ => add_le_add_left
le_of_add_le_add_left := fun s₁ s₂ s₃ => le_of_add_le_add_left
nsmul := nsmulRec
theorem le_add_right (s t : Multiset α) : s ≤ s + t := by simpa using add_le_add_left (zero_le t) s
#align multiset.le_add_right Multiset.le_add_right
theorem le_add_left (s t : Multiset α) : s ≤ t + s := by simpa using add_le_add_right (zero_le t) s
#align multiset.le_add_left Multiset.le_add_left
theorem le_iff_exists_add {s t : Multiset α} : s ≤ t ↔ ∃ u, t = s + u :=
⟨fun h =>
leInductionOn h fun s =>
let ⟨l, p⟩ := s.exists_perm_append
⟨l, Quot.sound p⟩,
fun ⟨_u, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ le_add_right _ _⟩
#align multiset.le_iff_exists_add Multiset.le_iff_exists_add
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid (Multiset α) where
__ := inferInstanceAs (OrderBot (Multiset α))
le_self_add := le_add_right
exists_add_of_le h := leInductionOn h fun s =>
let ⟨l, p⟩ := s.exists_perm_append
⟨l, Quot.sound p⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_add (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ s + t = a ::ₘ (s + t) := by
rw [← singleton_add, ← singleton_add, add_assoc]
#align multiset.cons_add Multiset.cons_add
@[simp]
theorem add_cons (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : s + a ::ₘ t = a ::ₘ (s + t) := by
rw [add_comm, cons_add, add_comm]
#align multiset.add_cons Multiset.add_cons
@[simp]
theorem mem_add {a : α} {s t : Multiset α} : a ∈ s + t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => mem_append
#align multiset.mem_add Multiset.mem_add
theorem mem_of_mem_nsmul {a : α} {s : Multiset α} {n : ℕ} (h : a ∈ n • s) : a ∈ s := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [zero_nsmul] at h
exact absurd h (not_mem_zero _)
· rw [succ_nsmul, mem_add] at h
exact h.elim ih id
#align multiset.mem_of_mem_nsmul Multiset.mem_of_mem_nsmul
@[simp]
theorem mem_nsmul {a : α} {s : Multiset α} {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) : a ∈ n • s ↔ a ∈ s := by
refine ⟨mem_of_mem_nsmul, fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h0
rw [succ_nsmul, mem_add]
exact Or.inr h
#align multiset.mem_nsmul Multiset.mem_nsmul
theorem nsmul_cons {s : Multiset α} (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
n • (a ::ₘ s) = n • ({a} : Multiset α) + n • s := by
rw [← singleton_add, nsmul_add]
#align multiset.nsmul_cons Multiset.nsmul_cons
/-! ### Cardinality -/
/-- The cardinality of a multiset is the sum of the multiplicities
of all its elements, or simply the length of the underlying list. -/
def card : Multiset α →+ ℕ where
toFun s := (Quot.liftOn s length) fun _l₁ _l₂ => Perm.length_eq
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' s t := Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t length_append
#align multiset.card Multiset.card
@[simp]
theorem coe_card (l : List α) : card (l : Multiset α) = length l :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_card Multiset.coe_card
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
#align multiset.length_to_list Multiset.length_toList
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10675): `dsimp` can not prove this, yet linter complains
theorem card_zero : @card α 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.card_zero Multiset.card_zero
theorem card_add (s t : Multiset α) : card (s + t) = card s + card t :=
card.map_add s t
#align multiset.card_add Multiset.card_add
theorem card_nsmul (s : Multiset α) (n : ℕ) : card (n • s) = n * card s := by
rw [card.map_nsmul s n, Nat.nsmul_eq_mul]
#align multiset.card_nsmul Multiset.card_nsmul
@[simp]
theorem card_cons (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : card (a ::ₘ s) = card s + 1 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.card_cons Multiset.card_cons
@[simp]
theorem card_singleton (a : α) : card ({a} : Multiset α) = 1 := by
simp only [← cons_zero, card_zero, eq_self_iff_true, zero_add, card_cons]
#align multiset.card_singleton Multiset.card_singleton
theorem card_pair (a b : α) : card {a, b} = 2 := by
rw [insert_eq_cons, card_cons, card_singleton]
#align multiset.card_pair Multiset.card_pair
theorem card_eq_one {s : Multiset α} : card s = 1 ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} :=
⟨Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h => (List.length_eq_one.1 h).imp fun _a => congr_arg _,
fun ⟨_a, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align multiset.card_eq_one Multiset.card_eq_one
theorem card_le_card {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : card s ≤ card t :=
leInductionOn h Sublist.length_le
#align multiset.card_le_of_le Multiset.card_le_card
@[mono]
theorem card_mono : Monotone (@card α) := fun _a _b => card_le_card
#align multiset.card_mono Multiset.card_mono
theorem eq_of_le_of_card_le {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : card t ≤ card s → s = t :=
leInductionOn h fun s h₂ => congr_arg _ <| s.eq_of_length_le h₂
#align multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le
theorem card_lt_card {s t : Multiset α} (h : s < t) : card s < card t :=
lt_of_not_ge fun h₂ => _root_.ne_of_lt h <| eq_of_le_of_card_le (le_of_lt h) h₂
#align multiset.card_lt_card Multiset.card_lt_card
lemma card_strictMono : StrictMono (card : Multiset α → ℕ) := fun _ _ ↦ card_lt_card
theorem lt_iff_cons_le {s t : Multiset α} : s < t ↔ ∃ a, a ::ₘ s ≤ t :=
⟨Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ h =>
Subperm.exists_of_length_lt (le_of_lt h) (card_lt_card h),
fun ⟨_a, h⟩ => lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_cons_self _ _) h⟩
#align multiset.lt_iff_cons_le Multiset.lt_iff_cons_le
@[simp]
theorem card_eq_zero {s : Multiset α} : card s = 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
⟨fun h => (eq_of_le_of_card_le (zero_le _) (le_of_eq h)).symm, fun e => by simp [e]⟩
#align multiset.card_eq_zero Multiset.card_eq_zero
theorem card_pos {s : Multiset α} : 0 < card s ↔ s ≠ 0 :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_congr card_eq_zero
#align multiset.card_pos Multiset.card_pos
theorem card_pos_iff_exists_mem {s : Multiset α} : 0 < card s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => length_pos_iff_exists_mem
#align multiset.card_pos_iff_exists_mem Multiset.card_pos_iff_exists_mem
theorem card_eq_two {s : Multiset α} : card s = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, s = {x, y} :=
⟨Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h =>
(List.length_eq_two.mp h).imp fun _a => Exists.imp fun _b => congr_arg _,
fun ⟨_a, _b, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align multiset.card_eq_two Multiset.card_eq_two
theorem card_eq_three {s : Multiset α} : card s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, s = {x, y, z} :=
⟨Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h =>
(List.length_eq_three.mp h).imp fun _a =>
Exists.imp fun _b => Exists.imp fun _c => congr_arg _,
fun ⟨_a, _b, _c, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align multiset.card_eq_three Multiset.card_eq_three
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
#align multiset.strong_induction_on Multiset.strongInductionOnₓ -- Porting note: reorderd universes
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
#align multiset.strong_induction_eq Multiset.strongInductionOn_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
#align multiset.case_strong_induction_on Multiset.case_strongInductionOn
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
-- Porting note: reorderd universes
#align multiset.strong_downward_induction Multiset.strongDownwardInductionₓ
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
#align multiset.strong_downward_induction_eq Multiset.strongDownwardInduction_eq
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
#align multiset.strong_downward_induction_on Multiset.strongDownwardInductionOn
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
#align multiset.strong_downward_induction_on_eq Multiset.strongDownwardInductionOn_eq
#align multiset.well_founded_lt wellFounded_lt
/-- Another way of expressing `strongInductionOn`: the `(<)` relation is well-founded. -/
instance instWellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT (Multiset α) :=
⟨Subrelation.wf Multiset.card_lt_card (measure Multiset.card).2⟩
#align multiset.is_well_founded_lt Multiset.instWellFoundedLT
/-! ### `Multiset.replicate` -/
/-- `replicate n a` is the multiset containing only `a` with multiplicity `n`. -/
def replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) : Multiset α :=
List.replicate n a
#align multiset.replicate Multiset.replicate
theorem coe_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) : (List.replicate n a : Multiset α) = replicate n a := rfl
#align multiset.coe_replicate Multiset.coe_replicate
@[simp] theorem replicate_zero (a : α) : replicate 0 a = 0 := rfl
#align multiset.replicate_zero Multiset.replicate_zero
@[simp] theorem replicate_succ (a : α) (n) : replicate (n + 1) a = a ::ₘ replicate n a := rfl
#align multiset.replicate_succ Multiset.replicate_succ
theorem replicate_add (m n : ℕ) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a + replicate n a :=
congr_arg _ <| List.replicate_add ..
#align multiset.replicate_add Multiset.replicate_add
/-- `Multiset.replicate` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def replicateAddMonoidHom (a : α) : ℕ →+ Multiset α where
toFun := fun n => replicate n a
map_zero' := replicate_zero a
map_add' := fun _ _ => replicate_add _ _ a
#align multiset.replicate_add_monoid_hom Multiset.replicateAddMonoidHom
#align multiset.replicate_add_monoid_hom_apply Multiset.replicateAddMonoidHom_apply
theorem replicate_one (a : α) : replicate 1 a = {a} := rfl
#align multiset.replicate_one Multiset.replicate_one
@[simp] theorem card_replicate (n) (a : α) : card (replicate n a) = n :=
length_replicate n a
#align multiset.card_replicate Multiset.card_replicate
theorem mem_replicate {a b : α} {n : ℕ} : b ∈ replicate n a ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ b = a :=
List.mem_replicate
#align multiset.mem_replicate Multiset.mem_replicate
theorem eq_of_mem_replicate {a b : α} {n} : b ∈ replicate n a → b = a :=
List.eq_of_mem_replicate
#align multiset.eq_of_mem_replicate Multiset.eq_of_mem_replicate
theorem eq_replicate_card {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : s = replicate (card s) a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => coe_eq_coe.trans <| perm_replicate.trans eq_replicate_length
#align multiset.eq_replicate_card Multiset.eq_replicate_card
alias ⟨_, eq_replicate_of_mem⟩ := eq_replicate_card
#align multiset.eq_replicate_of_mem Multiset.eq_replicate_of_mem
theorem eq_replicate {a : α} {n} {s : Multiset α} :
s = replicate n a ↔ card s = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ ⟨card_replicate _ _, fun _b => eq_of_mem_replicate⟩,
fun ⟨e, al⟩ => e ▸ eq_replicate_of_mem al⟩
#align multiset.eq_replicate Multiset.eq_replicate
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
#align multiset.replicate_right_injective Multiset.replicate_right_injective
@[simp] theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective h).eq_iff
#align multiset.replicate_right_inj Multiset.replicate_right_inj
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
-- Porting note: was `fun m n h => by rw [← (eq_replicate.1 h).1, card_replicate]`
LeftInverse.injective (card_replicate · a)
#align multiset.replicate_left_injective Multiset.replicate_left_injective
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n : ℕ) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ {a} :=
List.replicate_subset_singleton n a
#align multiset.replicate_subset_singleton Multiset.replicate_subset_singleton
theorem replicate_le_coe {a : α} {n} {l : List α} : replicate n a ≤ l ↔ List.replicate n a <+ l :=
⟨fun ⟨_l', p, s⟩ => perm_replicate.1 p ▸ s, Sublist.subperm⟩
#align multiset.replicate_le_coe Multiset.replicate_le_coe
theorem nsmul_replicate {a : α} (n m : ℕ) : n • replicate m a = replicate (n * m) a :=
((replicateAddMonoidHom a).map_nsmul _ _).symm
#align multiset.nsmul_replicate Multiset.nsmul_replicate
theorem nsmul_singleton (a : α) (n) : n • ({a} : Multiset α) = replicate n a := by
rw [← replicate_one, nsmul_replicate, mul_one]
#align multiset.nsmul_singleton Multiset.nsmul_singleton
theorem replicate_le_replicate (a : α) {k n : ℕ} : replicate k a ≤ replicate n a ↔ k ≤ n :=
_root_.trans (by rw [← replicate_le_coe, coe_replicate]) (List.replicate_sublist_replicate a)
#align multiset.replicate_le_replicate Multiset.replicate_le_replicate
theorem le_replicate_iff {m : Multiset α} {a : α} {n : ℕ} :
m ≤ replicate n a ↔ ∃ k ≤ n, m = replicate k a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨card m, (card_mono h).trans_eq (card_replicate _ _),
eq_replicate_card.2 fun _ hb => eq_of_mem_replicate <| subset_of_le h hb⟩,
fun ⟨_, hkn, hm⟩ => hm.symm ▸ (replicate_le_replicate _).2 hkn⟩
#align multiset.le_replicate_iff Multiset.le_replicate_iff
theorem lt_replicate_succ {m : Multiset α} {x : α} {n : ℕ} :
m < replicate (n + 1) x ↔ m ≤ replicate n x := by
rw [lt_iff_cons_le]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x', hx'⟩
have := eq_of_mem_replicate (mem_of_le hx' (mem_cons_self _ _))
rwa [this, replicate_succ, cons_le_cons_iff] at hx'
· intro h
rw [replicate_succ]
exact ⟨x, cons_le_cons _ h⟩
#align multiset.lt_replicate_succ Multiset.lt_replicate_succ
/-! ### Erasing one copy of an element -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α} {a b : α}
/-- `erase s a` is the multiset that subtracts 1 from the multiplicity of `a`. -/
def erase (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : Multiset α :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (l.erase a : Multiset α)) fun _l₁ _l₂ p => Quot.sound (p.erase a)
#align multiset.erase Multiset.erase
@[simp]
theorem coe_erase (l : List α) (a : α) : erase (l : Multiset α) a = l.erase a :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_erase Multiset.coe_erase
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10675): `dsimp` can not prove this, yet linter complains
theorem erase_zero (a : α) : (0 : Multiset α).erase a = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.erase_zero Multiset.erase_zero
@[simp]
theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : (a ::ₘ s).erase a = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| List.erase_cons_head a l
#align multiset.erase_cons_head Multiset.erase_cons_head
@[simp]
theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (s : Multiset α) (h : b ≠ a) :
(b ::ₘ s).erase a = b ::ₘ s.erase a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| List.erase_cons_tail l (not_beq_of_ne h)
#align multiset.erase_cons_tail Multiset.erase_cons_tail
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).erase a = 0 :=
erase_cons_head a 0
#align multiset.erase_singleton Multiset.erase_singleton
@[simp]
theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∉ s → s.erase a = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h => congr_arg _ <| List.erase_of_not_mem h
#align multiset.erase_of_not_mem Multiset.erase_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem cons_erase {s : Multiset α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → a ::ₘ s.erase a = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h => Quot.sound (perm_cons_erase h).symm
#align multiset.cons_erase Multiset.cons_erase
theorem erase_cons_tail_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(b ::ₘ s).erase a = b ::ₘ s.erase a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a b with rfl | hab
· simp [cons_erase h]
· exact s.erase_cons_tail hab.symm
theorem le_cons_erase (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : s ≤ a ::ₘ s.erase a :=
if h : a ∈ s then le_of_eq (cons_erase h).symm
else by rw [erase_of_not_mem h]; apply le_cons_self
#align multiset.le_cons_erase Multiset.le_cons_erase
theorem add_singleton_eq_iff {s t : Multiset α} {a : α} : s + {a} = t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s = t.erase a := by
rw [add_comm, singleton_add]; constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨s.mem_cons_self a, (s.erase_cons_head a).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨h, rfl⟩
exact cons_erase h
#align multiset.add_singleton_eq_iff Multiset.add_singleton_eq_iff
theorem erase_add_left_pos {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (t) : a ∈ s → (s + t).erase a = s.erase a + t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ l₂ h => congr_arg _ <| erase_append_left l₂ h
#align multiset.erase_add_left_pos Multiset.erase_add_left_pos
theorem erase_add_right_pos {a : α} (s) {t : Multiset α} (h : a ∈ t) :
(s + t).erase a = s + t.erase a := by rw [add_comm, erase_add_left_pos s h, add_comm]
#align multiset.erase_add_right_pos Multiset.erase_add_right_pos
theorem erase_add_right_neg {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (t) :
a ∉ s → (s + t).erase a = s + t.erase a :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ l₂ h => congr_arg _ <| erase_append_right l₂ h
#align multiset.erase_add_right_neg Multiset.erase_add_right_neg
theorem erase_add_left_neg {a : α} (s) {t : Multiset α} (h : a ∉ t) :
(s + t).erase a = s.erase a + t := by rw [add_comm, erase_add_right_neg s h, add_comm]
#align multiset.erase_add_left_neg Multiset.erase_add_left_neg
theorem erase_le (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : s.erase a ≤ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => (erase_sublist a l).subperm
#align multiset.erase_le Multiset.erase_le
@[simp]
theorem erase_lt {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : s.erase a < s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => not_imp_comm.1 erase_of_not_mem (ne_of_lt h), fun h => by
simpa [h] using lt_cons_self (s.erase a) a⟩
#align multiset.erase_lt Multiset.erase_lt
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : s.erase a ⊆ s :=
subset_of_le (erase_le a s)
#align multiset.erase_subset Multiset.erase_subset
theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ s.erase b ↔ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.mem_erase_of_ne ab
#align multiset.mem_erase_of_ne Multiset.mem_erase_of_ne
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.erase b → a ∈ s :=
mem_of_subset (erase_subset _ _)
#align multiset.mem_of_mem_erase Multiset.mem_of_mem_erase
theorem erase_comm (s : Multiset α) (a b : α) : (s.erase a).erase b = (s.erase b).erase a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| l.erase_comm a b
#align multiset.erase_comm Multiset.erase_comm
theorem erase_le_erase {s t : Multiset α} (a : α) (h : s ≤ t) : s.erase a ≤ t.erase a :=
leInductionOn h fun h => (h.erase _).subperm
#align multiset.erase_le_erase Multiset.erase_le_erase
theorem erase_le_iff_le_cons {s t : Multiset α} {a : α} : s.erase a ≤ t ↔ s ≤ a ::ₘ t :=
⟨fun h => le_trans (le_cons_erase _ _) (cons_le_cons _ h), fun h =>
if m : a ∈ s then by rw [← cons_erase m] at h; exact (cons_le_cons_iff _).1 h
else le_trans (erase_le _ _) ((le_cons_of_not_mem m).1 h)⟩
#align multiset.erase_le_iff_le_cons Multiset.erase_le_iff_le_cons
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_of_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s → card (s.erase a) = pred (card s) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => length_erase_of_mem
#align multiset.card_erase_of_mem Multiset.card_erase_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_add_one {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s → card (s.erase a) + 1 = card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => length_erase_add_one
#align multiset.card_erase_add_one Multiset.card_erase_add_one
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s → card (s.erase a) < card s :=
fun h => card_lt_card (erase_lt.mpr h)
#align multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem Multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
theorem card_erase_le {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : card (s.erase a) ≤ card s :=
card_le_card (erase_le a s)
#align multiset.card_erase_le Multiset.card_erase_le
theorem card_erase_eq_ite {a : α} {s : Multiset α} :
card (s.erase a) = if a ∈ s then pred (card s) else card s := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rwa [card_erase_of_mem h, if_pos]
· rwa [erase_of_not_mem h, if_neg]
#align multiset.card_erase_eq_ite Multiset.card_erase_eq_ite
end Erase
@[simp]
theorem coe_reverse (l : List α) : (reverse l : Multiset α) = l :=
Quot.sound <| reverse_perm _
#align multiset.coe_reverse Multiset.coe_reverse
/-! ### `Multiset.map` -/
/-- `map f s` is the lift of the list `map` operation. The multiplicity
of `b` in `map f s` is the number of `a ∈ s` (counting multiplicity)
such that `f a = b`. -/
def map (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) : Multiset β :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l : List α => (l.map f : Multiset β)) fun _l₁ _l₂ p => Quot.sound (p.map f)
#align multiset.map Multiset.map
@[congr]
theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} {s t : Multiset α} :
s = t → (∀ x ∈ t, f x = g x) → map f s = map g t := by
rintro rfl h
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact congr_arg _ (List.map_congr h)
#align multiset.map_congr Multiset.map_congr
theorem map_hcongr {β' : Type v} {m : Multiset α} {f : α → β} {f' : α → β'} (h : β = β')
(hf : ∀ a ∈ m, HEq (f a) (f' a)) : HEq (map f m) (map f' m) := by
subst h; simp at hf
simp [map_congr rfl hf]
#align multiset.map_hcongr Multiset.map_hcongr
theorem forall_mem_map_iff {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} {s : Multiset α} :
(∀ y ∈ s.map f, p y) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p (f x) :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun _L => List.forall_mem_map_iff
#align multiset.forall_mem_map_iff Multiset.forall_mem_map_iff
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma map_coe (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f l = l.map f := rfl
#align multiset.coe_map Multiset.map_coe
@[simp]
theorem map_zero (f : α → β) : map f 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.map_zero Multiset.map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_cons (f : α → β) (a s) : map f (a ::ₘ s) = f a ::ₘ map f s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.map_cons Multiset.map_cons
theorem map_comp_cons (f : α → β) (t) : map f ∘ cons t = cons (f t) ∘ map f := by
ext
simp
#align multiset.map_comp_cons Multiset.map_comp_cons
@[simp]
theorem map_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).map f = {f a} :=
rfl
#align multiset.map_singleton Multiset.map_singleton
@[simp]
theorem map_replicate (f : α → β) (k : ℕ) (a : α) : (replicate k a).map f = replicate k (f a) := by
simp only [← coe_replicate, map_coe, List.map_replicate]
#align multiset.map_replicate Multiset.map_replicate
@[simp]
theorem map_add (f : α → β) (s t) : map f (s + t) = map f s + map f t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => congr_arg _ <| map_append _ _ _
#align multiset.map_add Multiset.map_add
/-- If each element of `s : Multiset α` can be lifted to `β`, then `s` can be lifted to
`Multiset β`. -/
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Multiset α) (Multiset β) (map c) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf := by
rintro ⟨l⟩ hl
lift l to List β using hl
exact ⟨l, map_coe _ _⟩
#align multiset.can_lift Multiset.canLift
/-- `Multiset.map` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def mapAddMonoidHom (f : α → β) : Multiset α →+ Multiset β where
toFun := map f
map_zero' := map_zero _
map_add' := map_add _
#align multiset.map_add_monoid_hom Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_mapAddMonoidHom (f : α → β) :
(mapAddMonoidHom f : Multiset α → Multiset β) = map f :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_map_add_monoid_hom Multiset.coe_mapAddMonoidHom
theorem map_nsmul (f : α → β) (n : ℕ) (s) : map f (n • s) = n • map f s :=
(mapAddMonoidHom f).map_nsmul _ _
#align multiset.map_nsmul Multiset.map_nsmul
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : Multiset α} : b ∈ map f s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.mem_map
#align multiset.mem_map Multiset.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem card_map (f : α → β) (s) : card (map f s) = card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => length_map _ _
#align multiset.card_map Multiset.card_map
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero {s : Multiset α} {f : α → β} : s.map f = 0 ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← Multiset.card_eq_zero, Multiset.card_map, Multiset.card_eq_zero]
#align multiset.map_eq_zero Multiset.map_eq_zero
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ map f s :=
mem_map.2 ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
#align multiset.mem_map_of_mem Multiset.mem_map_of_mem
theorem map_eq_singleton {f : α → β} {s : Multiset α} {b : β} :
map f s = {b} ↔ ∃ a : α, s = {a} ∧ f a = b := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a, s = {a} := by rw [← card_eq_one, ← card_map, h, card_singleton]
refine ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩
rw [← mem_singleton, ← h, ha, map_singleton, mem_singleton]
· rintro ⟨a, rfl, rfl⟩
simp
#align multiset.map_eq_singleton Multiset.map_eq_singleton
theorem map_eq_cons [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) (t : Multiset β) (b : β) :
(∃ a ∈ s, f a = b ∧ (s.erase a).map f = t) ↔ s.map f = b ::ₘ t := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [← map_cons, Multiset.cons_erase ha]
· intro h
have : b ∈ s.map f := by
rw [h]
exact mem_cons_self _ _
obtain ⟨a, h1, rfl⟩ := mem_map.mp this
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := exists_cons_of_mem h1
rw [map_cons, cons_inj_right] at h
refine ⟨a, mem_cons_self _ _, rfl, ?_⟩
rw [Multiset.erase_cons_head, h]
#align multiset.map_eq_cons Multiset.map_eq_cons
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Multiset.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Function.Injective f) {a : α} {s : Multiset α} :
f a ∈ map f s ↔ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.mem_map_of_injective H
#align multiset.mem_map_of_injective Multiset.mem_map_of_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) : map g (map f s) = map (g ∘ f) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => congr_arg _ <| List.map_map _ _ _
#align multiset.map_map Multiset.map_map
theorem map_id (s : Multiset α) : map id s = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => congr_arg _ <| List.map_id _
#align multiset.map_id Multiset.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id' (s : Multiset α) : map (fun x => x) s = s :=
map_id s
#align multiset.map_id' Multiset.map_id'
-- Porting note: was a `simp` lemma in mathlib3
theorem map_const (s : Multiset α) (b : β) : map (const α b) s = replicate (card s) b :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => congr_arg _ <| List.map_const' _ _
#align multiset.map_const Multiset.map_const
-- Porting note: was not a `simp` lemma in mathlib3 because `Function.const` was reducible
@[simp] theorem map_const' (s : Multiset α) (b : β) : map (fun _ ↦ b) s = replicate (card s) b :=
map_const _ _
#align multiset.map_const' Multiset.map_const'
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (Function.const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ :=
eq_of_mem_replicate <| by rwa [map_const] at h
#align multiset.eq_of_mem_map_const Multiset.eq_of_mem_map_const
@[simp]
theorem map_le_map {f : α → β} {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : map f s ≤ map f t :=
leInductionOn h fun h => (h.map f).subperm
#align multiset.map_le_map Multiset.map_le_map
@[simp]
theorem map_lt_map {f : α → β} {s t : Multiset α} (h : s < t) : s.map f < t.map f := by
refine (map_le_map h.le).lt_of_not_le fun H => h.ne <| eq_of_le_of_card_le h.le ?_
rw [← s.card_map f, ← t.card_map f]
exact card_le_card H
#align multiset.map_lt_map Multiset.map_lt_map
theorem map_mono (f : α → β) : Monotone (map f) := fun _ _ => map_le_map
#align multiset.map_mono Multiset.map_mono
theorem map_strictMono (f : α → β) : StrictMono (map f) := fun _ _ => map_lt_map
#align multiset.map_strict_mono Multiset.map_strictMono
@[simp]
theorem map_subset_map {f : α → β} {s t : Multiset α} (H : s ⊆ t) : map f s ⊆ map f t := fun _b m =>
let ⟨a, h, e⟩ := mem_map.1 m
mem_map.2 ⟨a, H h, e⟩
#align multiset.map_subset_map Multiset.map_subset_map
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : α)
(s : Multiset α) : (s.erase x).map f = (s.map f).erase (f x) := by
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with y s ih
· simp
by_cases hxy : y = x
· cases hxy
simp
· rw [s.erase_cons_tail hxy, map_cons, map_cons, (s.map f).erase_cons_tail (hf.ne hxy), ih]
#align multiset.map_erase Multiset.map_erase
theorem map_erase_of_mem [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β)
(s : Multiset α) {x : α} (h : x ∈ s) : (s.erase x).map f = (s.map f).erase (f x) := by
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with y s ih
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne y x with rfl | hxy
· simp
replace h : x ∈ s := by simpa [hxy.symm] using h
rw [s.erase_cons_tail hxy, map_cons, map_cons, ih h, erase_cons_tail_of_mem (mem_map_of_mem f h)]
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Function.Surjective (map f) := by
intro s
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with x s ih
· exact ⟨0, map_zero _⟩
· obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hf x
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := ih
exact ⟨y ::ₘ t, map_cons _ _ _⟩
#align multiset.map_surjective_of_surjective Multiset.map_surjective_of_surjective
/-! ### `Multiset.fold` -/
/-- `foldl f H b s` is the lift of the list operation `foldl f b l`,
which folds `f` over the multiset. It is well defined when `f` is right-commutative,
that is, `f (f b a₁) a₂ = f (f b a₂) a₁`. -/
def foldl (f : β → α → β) (H : RightCommutative f) (b : β) (s : Multiset α) : β :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => List.foldl f b l) fun _l₁ _l₂ p => p.foldl_eq H b
#align multiset.foldl Multiset.foldl
@[simp]
theorem foldl_zero (f : β → α → β) (H b) : foldl f H b 0 = b :=
rfl
#align multiset.foldl_zero Multiset.foldl_zero
@[simp]
theorem foldl_cons (f : β → α → β) (H b a s) : foldl f H b (a ::ₘ s) = foldl f H (f b a) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.foldl_cons Multiset.foldl_cons
@[simp]
theorem foldl_add (f : β → α → β) (H b s t) : foldl f H b (s + t) = foldl f H (foldl f H b s) t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => foldl_append _ _ _ _
#align multiset.foldl_add Multiset.foldl_add
/-- `foldr f H b s` is the lift of the list operation `foldr f b l`,
which folds `f` over the multiset. It is well defined when `f` is left-commutative,
that is, `f a₁ (f a₂ b) = f a₂ (f a₁ b)`. -/
def foldr (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (b : β) (s : Multiset α) : β :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => List.foldr f b l) fun _l₁ _l₂ p => p.foldr_eq H b
#align multiset.foldr Multiset.foldr
@[simp]
theorem foldr_zero (f : α → β → β) (H b) : foldr f H b 0 = b :=
rfl
#align multiset.foldr_zero Multiset.foldr_zero
@[simp]
theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (H b a s) : foldr f H b (a ::ₘ s) = f a (foldr f H b s) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.foldr_cons Multiset.foldr_cons
@[simp]
theorem foldr_singleton (f : α → β → β) (H b a) : foldr f H b ({a} : Multiset α) = f a b :=
rfl
#align multiset.foldr_singleton Multiset.foldr_singleton
@[simp]
theorem foldr_add (f : α → β → β) (H b s t) : foldr f H b (s + t) = foldr f H (foldr f H b t) s :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => foldr_append _ _ _ _
#align multiset.foldr_add Multiset.foldr_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_foldr (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (b : β) (l : List α) :
foldr f H b l = l.foldr f b :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_foldr Multiset.coe_foldr
@[simp]
theorem coe_foldl (f : β → α → β) (H : RightCommutative f) (b : β) (l : List α) :
foldl f H b l = l.foldl f b :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_foldl Multiset.coe_foldl
theorem coe_foldr_swap (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (b : β) (l : List α) :
foldr f H b l = l.foldl (fun x y => f y x) b :=
(congr_arg (foldr f H b) (coe_reverse l)).symm.trans <| foldr_reverse _ _ _
#align multiset.coe_foldr_swap Multiset.coe_foldr_swap
theorem foldr_swap (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (b : β) (s : Multiset α) :
foldr f H b s = foldl (fun x y => f y x) (fun _x _y _z => (H _ _ _).symm) b s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => coe_foldr_swap _ _ _ _
#align multiset.foldr_swap Multiset.foldr_swap
theorem foldl_swap (f : β → α → β) (H : RightCommutative f) (b : β) (s : Multiset α) :
foldl f H b s = foldr (fun x y => f y x) (fun _x _y _z => (H _ _ _).symm) b s :=
(foldr_swap _ _ _ _).symm
#align multiset.foldl_swap Multiset.foldl_swap
theorem foldr_induction' (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (x : β) (q : α → Prop)
(p : β → Prop) (s : Multiset α) (hpqf : ∀ a b, q a → p b → p (f a b)) (px : p x)
(q_s : ∀ a ∈ s, q a) : p (foldr f H x s) := by
induction s using Multiset.induction with
| empty => simpa
| cons a s ihs =>
simp only [forall_mem_cons, foldr_cons] at q_s ⊢
exact hpqf _ _ q_s.1 (ihs q_s.2)
#align multiset.foldr_induction' Multiset.foldr_induction'
theorem foldr_induction (f : α → α → α) (H : LeftCommutative f) (x : α) (p : α → Prop)
(s : Multiset α) (p_f : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (f a b)) (px : p x) (p_s : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) :
p (foldr f H x s) :=
foldr_induction' f H x p p s p_f px p_s
#align multiset.foldr_induction Multiset.foldr_induction
theorem foldl_induction' (f : β → α → β) (H : RightCommutative f) (x : β) (q : α → Prop)
(p : β → Prop) (s : Multiset α) (hpqf : ∀ a b, q a → p b → p (f b a)) (px : p x)
(q_s : ∀ a ∈ s, q a) : p (foldl f H x s) := by
rw [foldl_swap]
exact foldr_induction' (fun x y => f y x) (fun x y z => (H _ _ _).symm) x q p s hpqf px q_s
#align multiset.foldl_induction' Multiset.foldl_induction'
theorem foldl_induction (f : α → α → α) (H : RightCommutative f) (x : α) (p : α → Prop)
(s : Multiset α) (p_f : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (f b a)) (px : p x) (p_s : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) :
p (foldl f H x s) :=
foldl_induction' f H x p p s p_f px p_s
#align multiset.foldl_induction Multiset.foldl_induction
/-! ### Map for partial functions -/
/-- Lift of the list `pmap` operation. Map a partial function `f` over a multiset
`s` whose elements are all in the domain of `f`. -/
nonrec def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (s : Multiset α) : (∀ a ∈ s, p a) → Multiset β :=
Quot.recOn' s (fun l H => ↑(pmap f l H)) fun l₁ l₂ (pp : l₁ ~ l₂) =>
funext fun H₂ : ∀ a ∈ l₂, p a =>
have H₁ : ∀ a ∈ l₁, p a := fun a h => H₂ a (pp.subset h)
have : ∀ {s₂ e H}, @Eq.ndrec (Multiset α) l₁ (fun s => (∀ a ∈ s, p a) → Multiset β)
(fun _ => ↑(pmap f l₁ H₁)) s₂ e H = ↑(pmap f l₁ H₁) := by
intro s₂ e _; subst e; rfl
this.trans <| Quot.sound <| pp.pmap f
#align multiset.pmap Multiset.pmap
@[simp]
theorem coe_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (l : List α) (H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) :
pmap f l H = l.pmap f H :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_pmap Multiset.coe_pmap
@[simp]
theorem pmap_zero {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (h : ∀ a ∈ (0 : Multiset α), p a) :
pmap f 0 h = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.pmap_zero Multiset.pmap_zero
@[simp]
theorem pmap_cons {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (a : α) (m : Multiset α) :
∀ h : ∀ b ∈ a ::ₘ m, p b,
pmap f (a ::ₘ m) h =
f a (h a (mem_cons_self a m)) ::ₘ pmap f m fun a ha => h a <| mem_cons_of_mem ha :=
Quotient.inductionOn m fun _l _h => rfl
#align multiset.pmap_cons Multiset.pmap_cons
/-- "Attach" a proof that `a ∈ s` to each element `a` in `s` to produce
a multiset on `{x // x ∈ s}`. -/
def attach (s : Multiset α) : Multiset { x // x ∈ s } :=
pmap Subtype.mk s fun _a => id
#align multiset.attach Multiset.attach
@[simp]
theorem coe_attach (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset { x // x ∈ l }) (@attach α l) l.attach :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_attach Multiset.coe_attach
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l a b
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
#align multiset.sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem Multiset.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) :
∀ H, @pmap _ _ p (fun a _ => f a) s H = map f s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l H => congr_arg _ <| List.pmap_eq_map p f l H
#align multiset.pmap_eq_map Multiset.pmap_eq_map
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {g : ∀ a, q a → β} (s : Multiset α) :
∀ {H₁ H₂}, (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ (h₁ h₂), f a h₁ = g a h₂) → pmap f s H₁ = pmap g s H₂ :=
@(Quot.inductionOn s (fun l _H₁ _H₂ h => congr_arg _ <| List.pmap_congr l h))
#align multiset.pmap_congr Multiset.pmap_congr
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (s) :
∀ H, map g (pmap f s H) = pmap (fun a h => g (f a h)) s H :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l H => congr_arg _ <| List.map_pmap g f l H
#align multiset.map_pmap Multiset.map_pmap
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (s) :
∀ H, pmap f s H = s.attach.map fun x => f x.1 (H _ x.2) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l H => congr_arg _ <| List.pmap_eq_map_attach f l H
#align multiset.pmap_eq_map_attach Multiset.pmap_eq_map_attach
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: Left hand does not simplify
theorem attach_map_val' (s : Multiset α) (f : α → β) : (s.attach.map fun i => f i.val) = s.map f :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| List.attach_map_coe' l f
#align multiset.attach_map_coe' Multiset.attach_map_val'
#align multiset.attach_map_val' Multiset.attach_map_val'
@[simp]
theorem attach_map_val (s : Multiset α) : s.attach.map Subtype.val = s :=
(attach_map_val' _ _).trans s.map_id
#align multiset.attach_map_coe Multiset.attach_map_val
#align multiset.attach_map_val Multiset.attach_map_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_attach (s : Multiset α) : ∀ x, x ∈ s.attach :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.mem_attach _
#align multiset.mem_attach Multiset.mem_attach
@[simp]
theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {s H b} :
b ∈ pmap f s H ↔ ∃ (a : _) (h : a ∈ s), f a (H a h) = b :=
Quot.inductionOn s (fun _l _H => List.mem_pmap) H
#align multiset.mem_pmap Multiset.mem_pmap
@[simp]
theorem card_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (s H) : card (pmap f s H) = card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s (fun _l _H => length_pmap) H
#align multiset.card_pmap Multiset.card_pmap
@[simp]
theorem card_attach {m : Multiset α} : card (attach m) = card m :=
card_pmap _ _ _
#align multiset.card_attach Multiset.card_attach
@[simp]
theorem attach_zero : (0 : Multiset α).attach = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.attach_zero Multiset.attach_zero
theorem attach_cons (a : α) (m : Multiset α) :
(a ::ₘ m).attach =
⟨a, mem_cons_self a m⟩ ::ₘ m.attach.map fun p => ⟨p.1, mem_cons_of_mem p.2⟩ :=
Quotient.inductionOn m fun l =>
congr_arg _ <|
congr_arg (List.cons _) <| by
rw [List.map_pmap]; exact List.pmap_congr _ fun _ _ _ _ => Subtype.eq rfl
#align multiset.attach_cons Multiset.attach_cons
section DecidablePiExists
variable {m : Multiset α}
/-- If `p` is a decidable predicate,
so is the predicate that all elements of a multiset satisfy `p`. -/
protected def decidableForallMultiset {p : α → Prop} [hp : ∀ a, Decidable (p a)] :
Decidable (∀ a ∈ m, p a) :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton m fun l => decidable_of_iff (∀ a ∈ l, p a) <| by simp
#align multiset.decidable_forall_multiset Multiset.decidableForallMultiset
instance decidableDforallMultiset {p : ∀ a ∈ m, Prop} [_hp : ∀ (a) (h : a ∈ m), Decidable (p a h)] :
Decidable (∀ (a) (h : a ∈ m), p a h) :=
@decidable_of_iff _ _
(Iff.intro (fun h a ha => h ⟨a, ha⟩ (mem_attach _ _)) fun h ⟨_a, _ha⟩ _ => h _ _)
(@Multiset.decidableForallMultiset _ m.attach (fun a => p a.1 a.2) _)
#align multiset.decidable_dforall_multiset Multiset.decidableDforallMultiset
/-- decidable equality for functions whose domain is bounded by multisets -/
instance decidableEqPiMultiset {β : α → Type*} [h : ∀ a, DecidableEq (β a)] :
DecidableEq (∀ a ∈ m, β a) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (∀ (a) (h : a ∈ m), f a h = g a h) (by simp [Function.funext_iff])
#align multiset.decidable_eq_pi_multiset Multiset.decidableEqPiMultiset
/-- If `p` is a decidable predicate,
so is the existence of an element in a multiset satisfying `p`. -/
protected def decidableExistsMultiset {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] : Decidable (∃ x ∈ m, p x) :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton m fun l => decidable_of_iff (∃ a ∈ l, p a) <| by simp
#align multiset.decidable_exists_multiset Multiset.decidableExistsMultiset
instance decidableDexistsMultiset {p : ∀ a ∈ m, Prop} [_hp : ∀ (a) (h : a ∈ m), Decidable (p a h)] :
Decidable (∃ (a : _) (h : a ∈ m), p a h) :=
@decidable_of_iff _ _
(Iff.intro (fun ⟨⟨a, ha₁⟩, _, ha₂⟩ => ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩) fun ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ =>
⟨⟨a, ha₁⟩, mem_attach _ _, ha₂⟩)
(@Multiset.decidableExistsMultiset { a // a ∈ m } m.attach (fun a => p a.1 a.2) _)
#align multiset.decidable_dexists_multiset Multiset.decidableDexistsMultiset
end DecidablePiExists
/-! ### Subtraction -/
section
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u : Multiset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s - t` is the multiset such that `count a (s - t) = count a s - count a t` for all `a`
(note that it is truncated subtraction, so it is `0` if `count a t ≥ count a s`). -/
protected def sub (s t : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
(Quotient.liftOn₂ s t fun l₁ l₂ => (l₁.diff l₂ : Multiset α)) fun _v₁ _v₂ _w₁ _w₂ p₁ p₂ =>
Quot.sound <| p₁.diff p₂
#align multiset.sub Multiset.sub
instance : Sub (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.sub⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (s t : List α) : (s - t : Multiset α) = (s.diff t : List α) :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_sub Multiset.coe_sub
/-- This is a special case of `tsub_zero`, which should be used instead of this.
This is needed to prove `OrderedSub (Multiset α)`. -/
protected theorem sub_zero (s : Multiset α) : s - 0 = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.sub_zero Multiset.sub_zero
@[simp]
theorem sub_cons (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : s - a ::ₘ t = s.erase a - t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => congr_arg _ <| diff_cons _ _ _
#align multiset.sub_cons Multiset.sub_cons
/-- This is a special case of `tsub_le_iff_right`, which should be used instead of this.
This is needed to prove `OrderedSub (Multiset α)`. -/
protected theorem sub_le_iff_le_add : s - t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ u + t := by
revert s
exact @(Multiset.induction_on t (by simp [Multiset.sub_zero]) fun a t IH s => by
simp [IH, erase_le_iff_le_cons])
#align multiset.sub_le_iff_le_add Multiset.sub_le_iff_le_add
instance : OrderedSub (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun _n _m _k => Multiset.sub_le_iff_le_add⟩
theorem cons_sub_of_le (a : α) {s t : Multiset α} (h : t ≤ s) : a ::ₘ s - t = a ::ₘ (s - t) := by
rw [← singleton_add, ← singleton_add, add_tsub_assoc_of_le h]
#align multiset.cons_sub_of_le Multiset.cons_sub_of_le
theorem sub_eq_fold_erase (s t : Multiset α) : s - t = foldl erase erase_comm s t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun l₁ l₂ => by
show ofList (l₁.diff l₂) = foldl erase erase_comm l₁ l₂
rw [diff_eq_foldl l₁ l₂]
symm
exact foldl_hom _ _ _ _ _ fun x y => rfl
#align multiset.sub_eq_fold_erase Multiset.sub_eq_fold_erase
@[simp]
theorem card_sub {s t : Multiset α} (h : t ≤ s) : card (s - t) = card s - card t :=
Nat.eq_sub_of_add_eq $ by rw [← card_add, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
#align multiset.card_sub Multiset.card_sub
/-! ### Union -/
/-- `s ∪ t` is the lattice join operation with respect to the
multiset `≤`. The multiplicity of `a` in `s ∪ t` is the maximum
of the multiplicities in `s` and `t`. -/
def union (s t : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
s - t + t
#align multiset.union Multiset.union
instance : Union (Multiset α) :=
⟨union⟩
theorem union_def (s t : Multiset α) : s ∪ t = s - t + t :=
rfl
#align multiset.union_def Multiset.union_def
theorem le_union_left (s t : Multiset α) : s ≤ s ∪ t :=
le_tsub_add
#align multiset.le_union_left Multiset.le_union_left
theorem le_union_right (s t : Multiset α) : t ≤ s ∪ t :=
le_add_left _ _
#align multiset.le_union_right Multiset.le_union_right
theorem eq_union_left : t ≤ s → s ∪ t = s :=
tsub_add_cancel_of_le
#align multiset.eq_union_left Multiset.eq_union_left
theorem union_le_union_right (h : s ≤ t) (u) : s ∪ u ≤ t ∪ u :=
add_le_add_right (tsub_le_tsub_right h _) u
#align multiset.union_le_union_right Multiset.union_le_union_right
theorem union_le (h₁ : s ≤ u) (h₂ : t ≤ u) : s ∪ t ≤ u := by
rw [← eq_union_left h₂]; exact union_le_union_right h₁ t
#align multiset.union_le Multiset.union_le
@[simp]
theorem mem_union : a ∈ s ∪ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
⟨fun h => (mem_add.1 h).imp_left (mem_of_le tsub_le_self),
(Or.elim · (mem_of_le <| le_union_left _ _) (mem_of_le <| le_union_right _ _))⟩
#align multiset.mem_union Multiset.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem map_union [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Function.Injective f) {s t : Multiset α} :
map f (s ∪ t) = map f s ∪ map f t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun l₁ l₂ =>
congr_arg ofList (by rw [List.map_append f, List.map_diff finj])
#align multiset.map_union Multiset.map_union
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp] theorem zero_union : 0 ∪ s = s := by
simp [union_def]
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp] theorem union_zero : s ∪ 0 = s := by
simp [union_def]
/-! ### Intersection -/
/-- `s ∩ t` is the lattice meet operation with respect to the
multiset `≤`. The multiplicity of `a` in `s ∩ t` is the minimum
of the multiplicities in `s` and `t`. -/
def inter (s t : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ s t (fun l₁ l₂ => (l₁.bagInter l₂ : Multiset α)) fun _v₁ _v₂ _w₁ _w₂ p₁ p₂ =>
Quot.sound <| p₁.bagInter p₂
#align multiset.inter Multiset.inter
instance : Inter (Multiset α) :=
⟨inter⟩
@[simp]
theorem inter_zero (s : Multiset α) : s ∩ 0 = 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList l.bagInter_nil
#align multiset.inter_zero Multiset.inter_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_inter (s : Multiset α) : 0 ∩ s = 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList l.nil_bagInter
#align multiset.zero_inter Multiset.zero_inter
@[simp]
theorem cons_inter_of_pos {a} (s : Multiset α) {t} : a ∈ t → (a ::ₘ s) ∩ t = a ::ₘ s ∩ t.erase a :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ h => congr_arg ofList <| cons_bagInter_of_pos _ h
#align multiset.cons_inter_of_pos Multiset.cons_inter_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem cons_inter_of_neg {a} (s : Multiset α) {t} : a ∉ t → (a ::ₘ s) ∩ t = s ∩ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ h => congr_arg ofList <| cons_bagInter_of_neg _ h
#align multiset.cons_inter_of_neg Multiset.cons_inter_of_neg
theorem inter_le_left (s t : Multiset α) : s ∩ t ≤ s :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => (bagInter_sublist_left _ _).subperm
#align multiset.inter_le_left Multiset.inter_le_left
theorem inter_le_right (s : Multiset α) : ∀ t, s ∩ t ≤ t :=
Multiset.induction_on s (fun t => (zero_inter t).symm ▸ zero_le _) fun a s IH t =>
if h : a ∈ t then by simpa [h] using cons_le_cons a (IH (t.erase a)) else by simp [h, IH]
#align multiset.inter_le_right Multiset.inter_le_right
theorem le_inter (h₁ : s ≤ t) (h₂ : s ≤ u) : s ≤ t ∩ u := by
revert s u; refine @(Multiset.induction_on t ?_ fun a t IH => ?_) <;> intros s u h₁ h₂
· simpa only [zero_inter, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using h₁
by_cases h : a ∈ u
· rw [cons_inter_of_pos _ h, ← erase_le_iff_le_cons]
exact IH (erase_le_iff_le_cons.2 h₁) (erase_le_erase _ h₂)
· rw [cons_inter_of_neg _ h]
exact IH ((le_cons_of_not_mem <| mt (mem_of_le h₂) h).1 h₁) h₂
#align multiset.le_inter Multiset.le_inter
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter : a ∈ s ∩ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_le (inter_le_left _ _) h, mem_of_le (inter_le_right _ _) h⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by
rw [← cons_erase h₁, cons_inter_of_pos _ h₂]; apply mem_cons_self⟩
#align multiset.mem_inter Multiset.mem_inter
instance : Lattice (Multiset α) :=
{ sup := (· ∪ ·)
sup_le := @union_le _ _
le_sup_left := le_union_left
le_sup_right := le_union_right
inf := (· ∩ ·)
le_inf := @le_inter _ _
inf_le_left := inter_le_left
inf_le_right := inter_le_right }
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union (s t : Multiset α) : s ⊔ t = s ∪ t :=
rfl
#align multiset.sup_eq_union Multiset.sup_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter (s t : Multiset α) : s ⊓ t = s ∩ t :=
rfl
#align multiset.inf_eq_inter Multiset.inf_eq_inter
@[simp]
theorem le_inter_iff : s ≤ t ∩ u ↔ s ≤ t ∧ s ≤ u :=
le_inf_iff
#align multiset.le_inter_iff Multiset.le_inter_iff
@[simp]
theorem union_le_iff : s ∪ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ u ∧ t ≤ u :=
sup_le_iff
#align multiset.union_le_iff Multiset.union_le_iff
theorem union_comm (s t : Multiset α) : s ∪ t = t ∪ s := sup_comm _ _
#align multiset.union_comm Multiset.union_comm
theorem inter_comm (s t : Multiset α) : s ∩ t = t ∩ s := inf_comm _ _
#align multiset.inter_comm Multiset.inter_comm
theorem eq_union_right (h : s ≤ t) : s ∪ t = t := by rw [union_comm, eq_union_left h]
#align multiset.eq_union_right Multiset.eq_union_right
theorem union_le_union_left (h : s ≤ t) (u) : u ∪ s ≤ u ∪ t :=
sup_le_sup_left h _
#align multiset.union_le_union_left Multiset.union_le_union_left
theorem union_le_add (s t : Multiset α) : s ∪ t ≤ s + t :=
union_le (le_add_right _ _) (le_add_left _ _)
#align multiset.union_le_add Multiset.union_le_add
theorem union_add_distrib (s t u : Multiset α) : s ∪ t + u = s + u ∪ (t + u) := by
simpa [(· ∪ ·), union, eq_comm, add_assoc] using
show s + u - (t + u) = s - t by rw [add_comm t, tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, add_tsub_cancel_right]
#align multiset.union_add_distrib Multiset.union_add_distrib
theorem add_union_distrib (s t u : Multiset α) : s + (t ∪ u) = s + t ∪ (s + u) := by
rw [add_comm, union_add_distrib, add_comm s, add_comm s]
#align multiset.add_union_distrib Multiset.add_union_distrib
theorem cons_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ (s ∪ t) = a ::ₘ s ∪ a ::ₘ t := by
simpa using add_union_distrib (a ::ₘ 0) s t
#align multiset.cons_union_distrib Multiset.cons_union_distrib
theorem inter_add_distrib (s t u : Multiset α) : s ∩ t + u = (s + u) ∩ (t + u) := by
by_contra h
cases'
lt_iff_cons_le.1
(lt_of_le_of_ne
(le_inter (add_le_add_right (inter_le_left s t) u)
(add_le_add_right (inter_le_right s t) u))
h) with
a hl
rw [← cons_add] at hl
exact
not_le_of_lt (lt_cons_self (s ∩ t) a)
(le_inter (le_of_add_le_add_right (le_trans hl (inter_le_left _ _)))
(le_of_add_le_add_right (le_trans hl (inter_le_right _ _))))
#align multiset.inter_add_distrib Multiset.inter_add_distrib
theorem add_inter_distrib (s t u : Multiset α) : s + t ∩ u = (s + t) ∩ (s + u) := by
rw [add_comm, inter_add_distrib, add_comm s, add_comm s]
#align multiset.add_inter_distrib Multiset.add_inter_distrib
theorem cons_inter_distrib (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ s ∩ t = (a ::ₘ s) ∩ (a ::ₘ t) := by
simp
#align multiset.cons_inter_distrib Multiset.cons_inter_distrib
theorem union_add_inter (s t : Multiset α) : s ∪ t + s ∩ t = s + t := by
apply _root_.le_antisymm
· rw [union_add_distrib]
refine union_le (add_le_add_left (inter_le_right _ _) _) ?_
rw [add_comm]
exact add_le_add_right (inter_le_left _ _) _
· rw [add_comm, add_inter_distrib]
refine le_inter (add_le_add_right (le_union_right _ _) _) ?_
rw [add_comm]
exact add_le_add_right (le_union_left _ _) _
#align multiset.union_add_inter Multiset.union_add_inter
theorem sub_add_inter (s t : Multiset α) : s - t + s ∩ t = s := by
rw [inter_comm]
revert s; refine Multiset.induction_on t (by simp) fun a t IH s => ?_
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [cons_inter_of_pos _ h, sub_cons, add_cons, IH, cons_erase h]
· rw [cons_inter_of_neg _ h, sub_cons, erase_of_not_mem h, IH]
#align multiset.sub_add_inter Multiset.sub_add_inter
theorem sub_inter (s t : Multiset α) : s - s ∩ t = s - t :=
add_right_cancel <| by rw [sub_add_inter s t, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (inter_le_left s t)]
#align multiset.sub_inter Multiset.sub_inter
end
/-! ### `Multiset.filter` -/
section
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
/-- `Filter p s` returns the elements in `s` (with the same multiplicities)
which satisfy `p`, and removes the rest. -/
def filter (s : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (List.filter p l : Multiset α)) fun _l₁ _l₂ h => Quot.sound <| h.filter p
#align multiset.filter Multiset.filter
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma filter_coe (l : List α) : filter p l = l.filter p := rfl
#align multiset.coe_filter Multiset.filter_coe
@[simp]
theorem filter_zero : filter p 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.filter_zero Multiset.filter_zero
theorem filter_congr {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] {s : Multiset α} :
(∀ x ∈ s, p x ↔ q x) → filter p s = filter q s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h => congr_arg ofList <| filter_congr' <| by simpa using h
#align multiset.filter_congr Multiset.filter_congr
@[simp]
theorem filter_add (s t : Multiset α) : filter p (s + t) = filter p s + filter p t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => congr_arg ofList <| filter_append _ _
#align multiset.filter_add Multiset.filter_add
@[simp]
theorem filter_le (s : Multiset α) : filter p s ≤ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => (filter_sublist _).subperm
#align multiset.filter_le Multiset.filter_le
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset (s : Multiset α) : filter p s ⊆ s :=
subset_of_le <| filter_le _ _
#align multiset.filter_subset Multiset.filter_subset
theorem filter_le_filter {s t} (h : s ≤ t) : filter p s ≤ filter p t :=
leInductionOn h fun h => (h.filter (p ·)).subperm
#align multiset.filter_le_filter Multiset.filter_le_filter
theorem monotone_filter_left : Monotone (filter p) := fun _s _t => filter_le_filter p
#align multiset.monotone_filter_left Multiset.monotone_filter_left
theorem monotone_filter_right (s : Multiset α) ⦃p q : α → Prop⦄ [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(h : ∀ b, p b → q b) :
s.filter p ≤ s.filter q :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => (l.monotone_filter_right <| by simpa using h).subperm
#align multiset.monotone_filter_right Multiset.monotone_filter_right
variable {p}
@[simp]
theorem filter_cons_of_pos {a : α} (s) : p a → filter p (a ::ₘ s) = a ::ₘ filter p s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l h => congr_arg ofList <| List.filter_cons_of_pos l <| by simpa using h
#align multiset.filter_cons_of_pos Multiset.filter_cons_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem filter_cons_of_neg {a : α} (s) : ¬p a → filter p (a ::ₘ s) = filter p s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l h => congr_arg ofList <| List.filter_cons_of_neg l <| by simpa using h
#align multiset.filter_cons_of_neg Multiset.filter_cons_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem mem_filter {a : α} {s} : a ∈ filter p s ↔ a ∈ s ∧ p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by simpa using List.mem_filter (p := (p ·))
#align multiset.mem_filter Multiset.mem_filter
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {s} (h : a ∈ filter p s) : p a :=
(mem_filter.1 h).2
#align multiset.of_mem_filter Multiset.of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {s} (h : a ∈ filter p s) : a ∈ s :=
(mem_filter.1 h).1
#align multiset.mem_of_mem_filter Multiset.mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (m : a ∈ l) (h : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨m, h⟩
#align multiset.mem_filter_of_mem Multiset.mem_filter_of_mem
theorem filter_eq_self {s} : filter p s = s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l =>
Iff.trans ⟨fun h => (filter_sublist _).eq_of_length (@congr_arg _ _ _ _ card h),
congr_arg ofList⟩ <| by simp
#align multiset.filter_eq_self Multiset.filter_eq_self
theorem filter_eq_nil {s} : filter p s = 0 ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ¬p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l =>
Iff.trans ⟨fun h => eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (@congr_arg _ _ _ _ card h), congr_arg ofList⟩ <|
by simpa using List.filter_eq_nil (p := (p ·))
#align multiset.filter_eq_nil Multiset.filter_eq_nil
theorem le_filter {s t} : s ≤ filter p t ↔ s ≤ t ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, p a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_trans h (filter_le _ _), fun _a m => of_mem_filter (mem_of_le h m)⟩, fun ⟨h, al⟩ =>
filter_eq_self.2 al ▸ filter_le_filter p h⟩
#align multiset.le_filter Multiset.le_filter
theorem filter_cons {a : α} (s : Multiset α) :
filter p (a ::ₘ s) = (if p a then {a} else 0) + filter p s := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, singleton_add]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h, zero_add]
#align multiset.filter_cons Multiset.filter_cons
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
filter p {a} = if p a then {a} else ∅ := by
simp only [singleton, filter_cons, filter_zero, add_zero, empty_eq_zero]
#align multiset.filter_singleton Multiset.filter_singleton
theorem filter_nsmul (s : Multiset α) (n : ℕ) : filter p (n • s) = n • filter p s := by
refine s.induction_on ?_ ?_
· simp only [filter_zero, nsmul_zero]
· intro a ha ih
rw [nsmul_cons, filter_add, ih, filter_cons, nsmul_add]
congr
split_ifs with hp <;>
· simp only [filter_eq_self, nsmul_zero, filter_eq_nil]
intro b hb
rwa [mem_singleton.mp (mem_of_mem_nsmul hb)]
#align multiset.filter_nsmul Multiset.filter_nsmul
variable (p)
@[simp]
theorem filter_sub [DecidableEq α] (s t : Multiset α) :
filter p (s - t) = filter p s - filter p t := by
revert s; refine Multiset.induction_on t (by simp) fun a t IH s => ?_
rw [sub_cons, IH]
by_cases h : p a
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, sub_cons]
congr
by_cases m : a ∈ s
· rw [← cons_inj_right a, ← filter_cons_of_pos _ h, cons_erase (mem_filter_of_mem m h),
cons_erase m]
· rw [erase_of_not_mem m, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_filter m)]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h]
by_cases m : a ∈ s
· rw [(by rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h] : filter p (erase s a) = filter p (a ::ₘ erase s a)),
cons_erase m]
· rw [erase_of_not_mem m]
#align multiset.filter_sub Multiset.filter_sub
@[simp]
theorem filter_union [DecidableEq α] (s t : Multiset α) :
filter p (s ∪ t) = filter p s ∪ filter p t := by simp [(· ∪ ·), union]
#align multiset.filter_union Multiset.filter_union
@[simp]
theorem filter_inter [DecidableEq α] (s t : Multiset α) :
filter p (s ∩ t) = filter p s ∩ filter p t :=
le_antisymm
(le_inter (filter_le_filter _ <| inter_le_left _ _)
(filter_le_filter _ <| inter_le_right _ _)) <|
le_filter.2
⟨inf_le_inf (filter_le _ _) (filter_le _ _), fun _a h =>
of_mem_filter (mem_of_le (inter_le_left _ _) h)⟩
#align multiset.filter_inter Multiset.filter_inter
@[simp]
theorem filter_filter (q) [DecidablePred q] (s : Multiset α) :
filter p (filter q s) = filter (fun a => p a ∧ q a) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => by simp
#align multiset.filter_filter Multiset.filter_filter
lemma filter_comm (q) [DecidablePred q] (s : Multiset α) :
filter p (filter q s) = filter q (filter p s) := by simp [and_comm]
#align multiset.filter_comm Multiset.filter_comm
theorem filter_add_filter (q) [DecidablePred q] (s : Multiset α) :
filter p s + filter q s = filter (fun a => p a ∨ q a) s + filter (fun a => p a ∧ q a) s :=
Multiset.induction_on s rfl fun a s IH => by by_cases p a <;> by_cases q a <;> simp [*]
#align multiset.filter_add_filter Multiset.filter_add_filter
theorem filter_add_not (s : Multiset α) : filter p s + filter (fun a => ¬p a) s = s := by
rw [filter_add_filter, filter_eq_self.2, filter_eq_nil.2]
· simp only [add_zero]
· simp [Decidable.em, -Bool.not_eq_true, -not_and, not_and_or, or_comm]
· simp only [Bool.not_eq_true, decide_eq_true_eq, Bool.eq_false_or_eq_true,
decide_True, implies_true, Decidable.em]
#align multiset.filter_add_not Multiset.filter_add_not
theorem map_filter (f : β → α) (s : Multiset β) : filter p (map f s) = map f (filter (p ∘ f) s) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => by simp [List.map_filter]; rfl
#align multiset.map_filter Multiset.map_filter
lemma map_filter' {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Multiset α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(s.filter p).map f = (s.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [(· ∘ ·), map_filter, hf.eq_iff]
#align multiset.map_filter' Multiset.map_filter'
lemma card_filter_le_iff (s : Multiset α) (P : α → Prop) [DecidablePred P] (n : ℕ) :
card (s.filter P) ≤ n ↔ ∀ s' ≤ s, n < card s' → ∃ a ∈ s', ¬ P a := by
fconstructor
· intro H s' hs' s'_card
by_contra! rid
have card := card_le_card (monotone_filter_left P hs') |>.trans H
exact s'_card.not_le (filter_eq_self.mpr rid ▸ card)
· contrapose!
exact fun H ↦ ⟨s.filter P, filter_le _ _, H, fun a ha ↦ (mem_filter.mp ha).2⟩
/-! ### Simultaneously filter and map elements of a multiset -/
/-- `filterMap f s` is a combination filter/map operation on `s`.
The function `f : α → Option β` is applied to each element of `s`;
if `f a` is `some b` then `b` is added to the result, otherwise
`a` is removed from the resulting multiset. -/
def filterMap (f : α → Option β) (s : Multiset α) : Multiset β :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (List.filterMap f l : Multiset β))
fun _l₁ _l₂ h => Quot.sound <| h.filterMap f
#align multiset.filter_map Multiset.filterMap
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma filterMap_coe (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) : filterMap f l = l.filterMap f := rfl
#align multiset.coe_filter_map Multiset.filterMap_coe
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_zero (f : α → Option β) : filterMap f 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.filter_map_zero Multiset.filterMap_zero
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_cons_none {f : α → Option β} (a : α) (s : Multiset α) (h : f a = none) :
filterMap f (a ::ₘ s) = filterMap f s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_cons_none a l h
#align multiset.filter_map_cons_none Multiset.filterMap_cons_none
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_cons_some (f : α → Option β) (a : α) (s : Multiset α) {b : β}
(h : f a = some b) : filterMap f (a ::ₘ s) = b ::ₘ filterMap f s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_cons_some f a l h
#align multiset.filter_map_cons_some Multiset.filterMap_cons_some
theorem filterMap_eq_map (f : α → β) : filterMap (some ∘ f) = map f :=
funext fun s =>
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| congr_fun (List.filterMap_eq_map f) l
#align multiset.filter_map_eq_map Multiset.filterMap_eq_map
theorem filterMap_eq_filter : filterMap (Option.guard p) = filter p :=
funext fun s =>
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| by
rw [← List.filterMap_eq_filter]
congr; funext a; simp
#align multiset.filter_map_eq_filter Multiset.filterMap_eq_filter
theorem filterMap_filterMap (f : α → Option β) (g : β → Option γ) (s : Multiset α) :
filterMap g (filterMap f s) = filterMap (fun x => (f x).bind g) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_filterMap f g l
#align multiset.filter_map_filter_map Multiset.filterMap_filterMap
theorem map_filterMap (f : α → Option β) (g : β → γ) (s : Multiset α) :
map g (filterMap f s) = filterMap (fun x => (f x).map g) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.map_filterMap f g l
#align multiset.map_filter_map Multiset.map_filterMap
theorem filterMap_map (f : α → β) (g : β → Option γ) (s : Multiset α) :
filterMap g (map f s) = filterMap (g ∘ f) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_map f g l
#align multiset.filter_map_map Multiset.filterMap_map
theorem filter_filterMap (f : α → Option β) (p : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Multiset α) :
filter p (filterMap f s) = filterMap (fun x => (f x).filter p) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filter_filterMap f p l
#align multiset.filter_filter_map Multiset.filter_filterMap
theorem filterMap_filter (f : α → Option β) (s : Multiset α) :
filterMap f (filter p s) = filterMap (fun x => if p x then f x else none) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| by simpa using List.filterMap_filter p f l
#align multiset.filter_map_filter Multiset.filterMap_filter
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_some (s : Multiset α) : filterMap some s = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_some l
#align multiset.filter_map_some Multiset.filterMap_some
@[simp]
theorem mem_filterMap (f : α → Option β) (s : Multiset α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filterMap f s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = some b :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => List.mem_filterMap f l
#align multiset.mem_filter_map Multiset.mem_filterMap
theorem map_filterMap_of_inv (f : α → Option β) (g : β → α) (H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x)
(s : Multiset α) : map g (filterMap f s) = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.map_filterMap_of_inv f g H l
#align multiset.map_filter_map_of_inv Multiset.map_filterMap_of_inv
theorem filterMap_le_filterMap (f : α → Option β) {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) :
filterMap f s ≤ filterMap f t :=
leInductionOn h fun h => (h.filterMap _).subperm
#align multiset.filter_map_le_filter_map Multiset.filterMap_le_filterMap
/-! ### countP -/
/-- `countP p s` counts the number of elements of `s` (with multiplicity) that
satisfy `p`. -/
def countP (s : Multiset α) : ℕ :=
Quot.liftOn s (List.countP p) fun _l₁ _l₂ => Perm.countP_eq (p ·)
#align multiset.countp Multiset.countP
@[simp]
theorem coe_countP (l : List α) : countP p l = l.countP p :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_countp Multiset.coe_countP
@[simp]
theorem countP_zero : countP p 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.countp_zero Multiset.countP_zero
variable {p}
@[simp]
theorem countP_cons_of_pos {a : α} (s) : p a → countP p (a ::ₘ s) = countP p s + 1 :=
Quot.inductionOn s <| by simpa using List.countP_cons_of_pos (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_cons_of_pos Multiset.countP_cons_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem countP_cons_of_neg {a : α} (s) : ¬p a → countP p (a ::ₘ s) = countP p s :=
Quot.inductionOn s <| by simpa using List.countP_cons_of_neg (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_cons_of_neg Multiset.countP_cons_of_neg
variable (p)
theorem countP_cons (b : α) (s) : countP p (b ::ₘ s) = countP p s + if p b then 1 else 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s <| by simp [List.countP_cons]
#align multiset.countp_cons Multiset.countP_cons
theorem countP_eq_card_filter (s) : countP p s = card (filter p s) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => l.countP_eq_length_filter (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_eq_card_filter Multiset.countP_eq_card_filter
theorem countP_le_card (s) : countP p s ≤ card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => countP_le_length (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_le_card Multiset.countP_le_card
@[simp]
theorem countP_add (s t) : countP p (s + t) = countP p s + countP p t := by
simp [countP_eq_card_filter]
#align multiset.countp_add Multiset.countP_add
@[simp]
theorem countP_nsmul (s) (n : ℕ) : countP p (n • s) = n * countP p s := by
induction n <;> simp [*, succ_nsmul, succ_mul, zero_nsmul]
#align multiset.countp_nsmul Multiset.countP_nsmul
theorem card_eq_countP_add_countP (s) : card s = countP p s + countP (fun x => ¬p x) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => by simp [l.length_eq_countP_add_countP p]
#align multiset.card_eq_countp_add_countp Multiset.card_eq_countP_add_countP
/-- `countP p`, the number of elements of a multiset satisfying `p`, promoted to an
`AddMonoidHom`. -/
def countPAddMonoidHom : Multiset α →+ ℕ where
toFun := countP p
map_zero' := countP_zero _
map_add' := countP_add _
#align multiset.countp_add_monoid_hom Multiset.countPAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_countPAddMonoidHom : (countPAddMonoidHom p : Multiset α → ℕ) = countP p :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_countp_add_monoid_hom Multiset.coe_countPAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem countP_sub [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α} (h : t ≤ s) :
countP p (s - t) = countP p s - countP p t := by
simp [countP_eq_card_filter, h, filter_le_filter]
#align multiset.countp_sub Multiset.countP_sub
theorem countP_le_of_le {s t} (h : s ≤ t) : countP p s ≤ countP p t := by
simpa [countP_eq_card_filter] using card_le_card (filter_le_filter p h)
#align multiset.countp_le_of_le Multiset.countP_le_of_le
@[simp]
theorem countP_filter (q) [DecidablePred q] (s : Multiset α) :
countP p (filter q s) = countP (fun a => p a ∧ q a) s := by simp [countP_eq_card_filter]
#align multiset.countp_filter Multiset.countP_filter
theorem countP_eq_countP_filter_add (s) (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
countP p s = (filter q s).countP p + (filter (fun a => ¬q a) s).countP p :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => by
convert l.countP_eq_countP_filter_add (p ·) (q ·)
simp [countP_filter]
#align multiset.countp_eq_countp_filter_add Multiset.countP_eq_countP_filter_add
@[simp]
theorem countP_True {s : Multiset α} : countP (fun _ => True) s = card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.countP_true
#align multiset.countp_true Multiset.countP_True
@[simp]
theorem countP_False {s : Multiset α} : countP (fun _ => False) s = 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.countP_false
#align multiset.countp_false Multiset.countP_False
theorem countP_map (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) (p : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
countP p (map f s) = card (s.filter fun a => p (f a)) := by
refine Multiset.induction_on s ?_ fun a t IH => ?_
· rw [map_zero, countP_zero, filter_zero, card_zero]
· rw [map_cons, countP_cons, IH, filter_cons, card_add, apply_ite card, card_zero, card_singleton,
add_comm]
#align multiset.countp_map Multiset.countP_map
-- Porting note: `Lean.Internal.coeM` forces us to type-ascript `{a // a ∈ s}`
lemma countP_attach (s : Multiset α) : s.attach.countP (fun a : {a // a ∈ s} ↦ p a) = s.countP p :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, coe_countP]
-- Porting note: was
-- rw [quot_mk_to_coe, coe_attach, coe_countP]
-- exact List.countP_attach _ _
rw [coe_attach]
refine (coe_countP _ _).trans ?_
convert List.countP_attach _ _
rfl
#align multiset.countp_attach Multiset.countP_attach
lemma filter_attach (s : Multiset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(s.attach.filter fun a : {a // a ∈ s} ↦ p ↑a) =
(s.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ ↦ Multiset.mem_of_mem_filter) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l ↦ congr_arg _ (List.filter_attach l p)
#align multiset.filter_attach Multiset.filter_attach
variable {p}
theorem countP_pos {s} : 0 < countP p s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by simpa using List.countP_pos (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_pos Multiset.countP_pos
theorem countP_eq_zero {s} : countP p s = 0 ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ¬p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by simp [List.countP_eq_zero]
#align multiset.countp_eq_zero Multiset.countP_eq_zero
theorem countP_eq_card {s} : countP p s = card s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by simp [List.countP_eq_length]
#align multiset.countp_eq_card Multiset.countP_eq_card
theorem countP_pos_of_mem {s a} (h : a ∈ s) (pa : p a) : 0 < countP p s :=
countP_pos.2 ⟨_, h, pa⟩
#align multiset.countp_pos_of_mem Multiset.countP_pos_of_mem
theorem countP_congr {s s' : Multiset α} (hs : s = s')
{p p' : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred p']
(hp : ∀ x ∈ s, p x = p' x) : s.countP p = s'.countP p' := by
revert hs hp
exact Quot.induction_on₂ s s'
(fun l l' hs hp => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe'', coe_eq_coe] at hs
apply hs.countP_congr
simpa using hp)
#align multiset.countp_congr Multiset.countP_congr
end
/-! ### Multiplicity of an element -/
section
variable [DecidableEq α] {s : Multiset α}
/-- `count a s` is the multiplicity of `a` in `s`. -/
def count (a : α) : Multiset α → ℕ :=
countP (a = ·)
#align multiset.count Multiset.count
@[simp]
theorem coe_count (a : α) (l : List α) : count a (ofList l) = l.count a := by
simp_rw [count, List.count, coe_countP (a = ·) l, @eq_comm _ a]
rfl
#align multiset.coe_count Multiset.coe_count
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this at EOF, but not right now
theorem count_zero (a : α) : count a 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.count_zero Multiset.count_zero
@[simp]
theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : count a (a ::ₘ s) = count a s + 1 :=
countP_cons_of_pos _ <| rfl
#align multiset.count_cons_self Multiset.count_cons_self
@[simp]
theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (s : Multiset α) : count a (b ::ₘ s) = count a s :=
countP_cons_of_neg _ <| h
#align multiset.count_cons_of_ne Multiset.count_cons_of_ne
theorem count_le_card (a : α) (s) : count a s ≤ card s :=
countP_le_card _ _
#align multiset.count_le_card Multiset.count_le_card
theorem count_le_of_le (a : α) {s t} : s ≤ t → count a s ≤ count a t :=
countP_le_of_le _
#align multiset.count_le_of_le Multiset.count_le_of_le
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (s : Multiset α) : count a s ≤ count a (b ::ₘ s) :=
count_le_of_le _ (le_cons_self _ _)
#align multiset.count_le_count_cons Multiset.count_le_count_cons
theorem count_cons (a b : α) (s : Multiset α) :
count a (b ::ₘ s) = count a s + if a = b then 1 else 0 :=
countP_cons (a = ·) _ _
#align multiset.count_cons Multiset.count_cons
theorem count_singleton_self (a : α) : count a ({a} : Multiset α) = 1 :=
count_eq_one_of_mem (nodup_singleton a) <| mem_singleton_self a
#align multiset.count_singleton_self Multiset.count_singleton_self
theorem count_singleton (a b : α) : count a ({b} : Multiset α) = if a = b then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [count_cons, ← cons_zero, count_zero, zero_add]
#align multiset.count_singleton Multiset.count_singleton
@[simp]
theorem count_add (a : α) : ∀ s t, count a (s + t) = count a s + count a t :=
countP_add _
#align multiset.count_add Multiset.count_add
/-- `count a`, the multiplicity of `a` in a multiset, promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def countAddMonoidHom (a : α) : Multiset α →+ ℕ :=
countPAddMonoidHom (a = ·)
#align multiset.count_add_monoid_hom Multiset.countAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_countAddMonoidHom {a : α} : (countAddMonoidHom a : Multiset α → ℕ) = count a :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_count_add_monoid_hom Multiset.coe_countAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem count_nsmul (a : α) (n s) : count a (n • s) = n * count a s := by
induction n <;> simp [*, succ_nsmul, succ_mul, zero_nsmul]
#align multiset.count_nsmul Multiset.count_nsmul
@[simp]
lemma count_attach (a : {x // x ∈ s}) : s.attach.count a = s.count ↑a :=
Eq.trans (countP_congr rfl fun _ _ => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]) <| countP_attach _ _
#align multiset.count_attach Multiset.count_attach
theorem count_pos {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : 0 < count a s ↔ a ∈ s := by simp [count, countP_pos]
#align multiset.count_pos Multiset.count_pos
theorem one_le_count_iff_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : 1 ≤ count a s ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [succ_le_iff, count_pos]
#align multiset.one_le_count_iff_mem Multiset.one_le_count_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∉ s) : count a s = 0 :=
by_contradiction fun h' => h <| count_pos.1 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
#align multiset.count_eq_zero_of_not_mem Multiset.count_eq_zero_of_not_mem
lemma count_ne_zero {a : α} : count a s ≠ 0 ↔ a ∈ s := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.symm.trans count_pos
#align multiset.count_ne_zero Multiset.count_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma count_eq_zero {a : α} : count a s = 0 ↔ a ∉ s := count_ne_zero.not_right
#align multiset.count_eq_zero Multiset.count_eq_zero
theorem count_eq_card {a : α} {s} : count a s = card s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, a = x := by
simp [countP_eq_card, count, @eq_comm _ a]
#align multiset.count_eq_card Multiset.count_eq_card
@[simp]
theorem count_replicate_self (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (replicate n a) = n := by
convert List.count_replicate_self a n
rw [← coe_count, coe_replicate]
#align multiset.count_replicate_self Multiset.count_replicate_self
theorem count_replicate (a b : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (replicate n b) = if a = b then n else 0 := by
convert List.count_replicate a b n
rw [← coe_count, coe_replicate]
#align multiset.count_replicate Multiset.count_replicate
@[simp]
theorem count_erase_self (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : count a (erase s a) = count a s - 1 :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
convert List.count_erase_self a l <;> rw [← coe_count] <;> simp
#align multiset.count_erase_self Multiset.count_erase_self
@[simp]
theorem count_erase_of_ne {a b : α} (ab : a ≠ b) (s : Multiset α) :
count a (erase s b) = count a s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
convert List.count_erase_of_ne ab l <;> rw [← coe_count] <;> simp
#align multiset.count_erase_of_ne Multiset.count_erase_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem count_sub (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : count a (s - t) = count a s - count a t := by
revert s; refine Multiset.induction_on t (by simp) fun b t IH s => ?_
rw [sub_cons, IH]
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne a b with rfl | ab
· rw [count_erase_self, count_cons_self, Nat.sub_sub, add_comm]
· rw [count_erase_of_ne ab, count_cons_of_ne ab]
#align multiset.count_sub Multiset.count_sub
@[simp]
theorem count_union (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : count a (s ∪ t) = max (count a s) (count a t) := by
simp [(· ∪ ·), union, Nat.sub_add_eq_max]
#align multiset.count_union Multiset.count_union
@[simp]
theorem count_inter (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : count a (s ∩ t) = min (count a s) (count a t) := by
apply @Nat.add_left_cancel (count a (s - t))
rw [← count_add, sub_add_inter, count_sub, Nat.sub_add_min_cancel]
#align multiset.count_inter Multiset.count_inter
theorem le_count_iff_replicate_le {a : α} {s : Multiset α} {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ count a s ↔ replicate n a ≤ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe'', mem_coe, coe_count]
exact le_count_iff_replicate_sublist.trans replicate_le_coe.symm
#align multiset.le_count_iff_replicate_le Multiset.le_count_iff_replicate_le
@[simp]
theorem count_filter_of_pos {p} [DecidablePred p] {a} {s : Multiset α} (h : p a) :
count a (filter p s) = count a s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe'', filter_coe, mem_coe, coe_count, decide_eq_true_eq]
apply count_filter
simpa using h
#align multiset.count_filter_of_pos Multiset.count_filter_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem count_filter_of_neg {p} [DecidablePred p] {a} {s : Multiset α} (h : ¬p a) :
count a (filter p s) = 0 :=
Multiset.count_eq_zero_of_not_mem fun t => h (of_mem_filter t)
#align multiset.count_filter_of_neg Multiset.count_filter_of_neg
theorem count_filter {p} [DecidablePred p] {a} {s : Multiset α} :
count a (filter p s) = if p a then count a s else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact count_filter_of_pos h
· exact count_filter_of_neg h
#align multiset.count_filter Multiset.count_filter
theorem ext {s t : Multiset α} : s = t ↔ ∀ a, count a s = count a t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => Quotient.eq.trans <| by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, filter_coe, mem_coe, coe_count, decide_eq_true_eq]
apply perm_iff_count
#align multiset.ext Multiset.ext
@[ext]
theorem ext' {s t : Multiset α} : (∀ a, count a s = count a t) → s = t :=
ext.2
#align multiset.ext' Multiset.ext'
@[simp]
theorem coe_inter (s t : List α) : (s ∩ t : Multiset α) = (s.bagInter t : List α) := by ext; simp
#align multiset.coe_inter Multiset.coe_inter
theorem le_iff_count {s t : Multiset α} : s ≤ t ↔ ∀ a, count a s ≤ count a t :=
⟨fun h a => count_le_of_le a h, fun al => by
rw [← (ext.2 fun a => by simp [max_eq_right (al a)] : s ∪ t = t)]; apply le_union_left⟩
#align multiset.le_iff_count Multiset.le_iff_count
instance : DistribLattice (Multiset α) :=
{ le_sup_inf := fun s t u =>
le_of_eq <|
Eq.symm <|
ext.2 fun a => by
simp only [max_min_distrib_left, Multiset.count_inter, Multiset.sup_eq_union,
Multiset.count_union, Multiset.inf_eq_inter] }
theorem count_map {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) [DecidableEq β] (b : β) :
count b (map f s) = card (s.filter fun a => b = f a) := by
simp [Bool.beq_eq_decide_eq, eq_comm, count, countP_map]
#align multiset.count_map Multiset.count_map
/-- `Multiset.map f` preserves `count` if `f` is injective on the set of elements contained in
the multiset -/
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 2,632 | 2,639 | theorem count_map_eq_count [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α)
(hf : Set.InjOn f { x : α | x ∈ s }) (x) (H : x ∈ s) : (s.map f).count (f x) = s.count x := by |
suffices (filter (fun a : α => f x = f a) s).count x = card (filter (fun a : α => f x = f a) s) by
rw [count, countP_map, ← this]
exact count_filter_of_pos <| rfl
· rw [eq_replicate_card.2 fun b hb => (hf H (mem_filter.1 hb).left _).symm]
· simp only [count_replicate, eq_self_iff_true, if_true, card_replicate]
· simp only [mem_filter, beq_iff_eq, and_imp, @eq_comm _ (f x), imp_self, implies_true]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
#align_import analysis.special_functions.exp from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ba5ff5ad5d120fb0ef094ad2994967e9bfaf5112"
/-!
# Complex and real exponential
In this file we prove continuity of `Complex.exp` and `Real.exp`. We also prove a few facts about
limits of `Real.exp` at infinity.
## Tags
exp
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset Filter Metric Asymptotics Set Function Bornology
open scoped Classical Topology Nat
namespace Complex
variable {z y x : ℝ}
theorem exp_bound_sq (x z : ℂ) (hz : ‖z‖ ≤ 1) :
‖exp (x + z) - exp x - z • exp x‖ ≤ ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
calc
‖exp (x + z) - exp x - z * exp x‖ = ‖exp x * (exp z - 1 - z)‖ := by
congr
rw [exp_add]
ring
_ = ‖exp x‖ * ‖exp z - 1 - z‖ := norm_mul _ _
_ ≤ ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (abs_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le hz) (norm_nonneg _)
#align complex.exp_bound_sq Complex.exp_bound_sq
theorem locally_lipschitz_exp {r : ℝ} (hr_nonneg : 0 ≤ r) (hr_le : r ≤ 1) (x y : ℂ)
(hyx : ‖y - x‖ < r) : ‖exp y - exp x‖ ≤ (1 + r) * ‖exp x‖ * ‖y - x‖ := by
have hy_eq : y = x + (y - x) := by abel
have hyx_sq_le : ‖y - x‖ ^ 2 ≤ r * ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [pow_two]
exact mul_le_mul hyx.le le_rfl (norm_nonneg _) hr_nonneg
have h_sq : ∀ z, ‖z‖ ≤ 1 → ‖exp (x + z) - exp x‖ ≤ ‖z‖ * ‖exp x‖ + ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by
intro z hz
have : ‖exp (x + z) - exp x - z • exp x‖ ≤ ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 := exp_bound_sq x z hz
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add', ← norm_smul z]
exact (norm_sub_norm_le _ _).trans this
calc
‖exp y - exp x‖ = ‖exp (x + (y - x)) - exp x‖ := by nth_rw 1 [hy_eq]
_ ≤ ‖y - x‖ * ‖exp x‖ + ‖exp x‖ * ‖y - x‖ ^ 2 := h_sq (y - x) (hyx.le.trans hr_le)
_ ≤ ‖y - x‖ * ‖exp x‖ + ‖exp x‖ * (r * ‖y - x‖) :=
(add_le_add_left (mul_le_mul le_rfl hyx_sq_le (sq_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) _)
_ = (1 + r) * ‖exp x‖ * ‖y - x‖ := by ring
#align complex.locally_lipschitz_exp Complex.locally_lipschitz_exp
-- Porting note: proof by term mode `locally_lipschitz_exp zero_le_one le_rfl x`
-- doesn't work because `‖y - x‖` and `dist y x` don't unify
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_exp : Continuous exp :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x =>
continuousAt_of_locally_lipschitz zero_lt_one (2 * ‖exp x‖)
(fun y ↦ by
convert locally_lipschitz_exp zero_le_one le_rfl x y using 2
congr
ring)
#align complex.continuous_exp Complex.continuous_exp
theorem continuousOn_exp {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn exp s :=
continuous_exp.continuousOn
#align complex.continuous_on_exp Complex.continuousOn_exp
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i / i !) =O[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) := by
rcases (zero_le n).eq_or_lt with rfl | hn
· simpa using continuous_exp.continuousAt.norm.isBoundedUnder_le
· refine .of_bound (n.succ / (n ! * n)) ?_
rw [NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_zero_basis_norm_lt.eventually_iff]
refine ⟨1, one_pos, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
convert exp_bound hx.out.le hn using 1
field_simp [mul_comm]
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_succ_isLittleO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), x ^ i / i !) =o[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) :=
(exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n + 1)).trans_isLittleO <| isLittleO_pow_pow n.lt_succ_self
end Complex
section ComplexContinuousExpComp
variable {α : Type*}
open Complex
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cexp {l : Filter α} {f : α → ℂ} {z : ℂ} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 z)) :
Tendsto (fun x => exp (f x)) l (𝓝 (exp z)) :=
(continuous_exp.tendsto _).comp hf
#align filter.tendsto.cexp Filter.Tendsto.cexp
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℂ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
nonrec
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.cexp (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun y => exp (f y)) s x :=
h.cexp
#align continuous_within_at.cexp ContinuousWithinAt.cexp
@[fun_prop]
nonrec
theorem ContinuousAt.cexp (h : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun y => exp (f y)) x :=
h.cexp
#align continuous_at.cexp ContinuousAt.cexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.cexp (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (fun y => exp (f y)) s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).cexp
#align continuous_on.cexp ContinuousOn.cexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.cexp (h : Continuous f) : Continuous fun y => exp (f y) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => h.continuousAt.cexp
#align continuous.cexp Continuous.cexp
end ComplexContinuousExpComp
namespace Real
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_exp : Continuous exp :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal.cexp
#align real.continuous_exp Real.continuous_exp
theorem continuousOn_exp {s : Set ℝ} : ContinuousOn exp s :=
continuous_exp.continuousOn
#align real.continuous_on_exp Real.continuousOn_exp
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i / i !) =O[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) := by
have := (Complex.exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow n).comp_tendsto
(Complex.continuous_ofReal.tendsto' 0 0 rfl)
simp only [(· ∘ ·)] at this
norm_cast at this
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_succ_isLittleO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), x ^ i / i !) =o[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) :=
(exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n + 1)).trans_isLittleO <| isLittleO_pow_pow n.lt_succ_self
end Real
section RealContinuousExpComp
variable {α : Type*}
open Real
theorem Filter.Tendsto.rexp {l : Filter α} {f : α → ℝ} {z : ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 z)) :
Tendsto (fun x => exp (f x)) l (𝓝 (exp z)) :=
(continuous_exp.tendsto _).comp hf
#align filter.tendsto.exp Filter.Tendsto.rexp
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
nonrec
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.rexp (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun y ↦ exp (f y)) s x :=
h.rexp
#align continuous_within_at.exp ContinuousWithinAt.rexp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-09")] alias ContinuousWithinAt.exp := ContinuousWithinAt.rexp
@[fun_prop]
nonrec
theorem ContinuousAt.rexp (h : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun y ↦ exp (f y)) x :=
h.rexp
#align continuous_at.exp ContinuousAt.rexp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-09")] alias ContinuousAt.exp := ContinuousAt.rexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.rexp (h : ContinuousOn f s) :
ContinuousOn (fun y ↦ exp (f y)) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).rexp
#align continuous_on.exp ContinuousOn.rexp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-09")] alias ContinuousOn.exp := ContinuousOn.rexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.rexp (h : Continuous f) : Continuous fun y ↦ exp (f y) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ h.continuousAt.rexp
#align continuous.exp Continuous.rexp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-09")] alias Continuous.exp := Continuous.rexp
end RealContinuousExpComp
namespace Real
variable {α : Type*} {x y z : ℝ} {l : Filter α}
theorem exp_half (x : ℝ) : exp (x / 2) = √(exp x) := by
rw [eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_sq_eq, sq, ← exp_add, add_halves] <;> exact (exp_pos _).le
#align real.exp_half Real.exp_half
/-- The real exponential function tends to `+∞` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_exp_atTop : Tendsto exp atTop atTop := by
have A : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x + 1) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_add_const_right atTop 1 tendsto_id
have B : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, x + 1 ≤ exp x := eventually_atTop.2 ⟨0, fun x _ => add_one_le_exp x⟩
exact tendsto_atTop_mono' atTop B A
#align real.tendsto_exp_at_top Real.tendsto_exp_atTop
/-- The real exponential function tends to `0` at `-∞` or, equivalently, `exp(-x)` tends to `0`
at `+∞` -/
theorem tendsto_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero : Tendsto (fun x => exp (-x)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
(tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp tendsto_exp_atTop).congr fun x => (exp_neg x).symm
#align real.tendsto_exp_neg_at_top_nhds_0 Real.tendsto_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias tendsto_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_0 := tendsto_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero
/-- The real exponential function tends to `1` at `0`. -/
theorem tendsto_exp_nhds_zero_nhds_one : Tendsto exp (𝓝 0) (𝓝 1) := by
convert continuous_exp.tendsto 0
simp
#align real.tendsto_exp_nhds_0_nhds_1 Real.tendsto_exp_nhds_zero_nhds_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias tendsto_exp_nhds_0_nhds_1 := tendsto_exp_nhds_zero_nhds_one
theorem tendsto_exp_atBot : Tendsto exp atBot (𝓝 0) :=
(tendsto_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero.comp tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop).congr fun x =>
congr_arg exp <| neg_neg x
#align real.tendsto_exp_at_bot Real.tendsto_exp_atBot
theorem tendsto_exp_atBot_nhdsWithin : Tendsto exp atBot (𝓝[>] 0) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_exp_atBot, tendsto_principal.2 <| eventually_of_forall exp_pos⟩
#align real.tendsto_exp_at_bot_nhds_within Real.tendsto_exp_atBot_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem isBoundedUnder_ge_exp_comp (l : Filter α) (f : α → ℝ) :
IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l fun x => exp (f x) :=
isBoundedUnder_of ⟨0, fun _ => (exp_pos _).le⟩
#align real.is_bounded_under_ge_exp_comp Real.isBoundedUnder_ge_exp_comp
@[simp]
theorem isBoundedUnder_le_exp_comp {f : α → ℝ} :
(IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => exp (f x)) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f :=
exp_monotone.isBoundedUnder_le_comp_iff tendsto_exp_atTop
#align real.is_bounded_under_le_exp_comp Real.isBoundedUnder_le_exp_comp
/-- The function `exp(x)/x^n` tends to `+∞` at `+∞`, for any natural number `n` -/
theorem tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop (n : ℕ) : Tendsto (fun x => exp x / x ^ n) atTop atTop := by
refine (atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff (atTop_basis' 1)).2 fun C hC₁ => ?_
have hC₀ : 0 < C := zero_lt_one.trans_le hC₁
have : 0 < (exp 1 * C)⁻¹ := inv_pos.2 (mul_pos (exp_pos _) hC₀)
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ : ∃ N : ℕ, ∀ k ≥ N, (↑k : ℝ) ^ n / exp 1 ^ k < (exp 1 * C)⁻¹ :=
eventually_atTop.1
((tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt n (one_lt_exp_iff.2 zero_lt_one)).eventually
(gt_mem_nhds this))
simp only [← exp_nat_mul, mul_one, div_lt_iff, exp_pos, ← div_eq_inv_mul] at hN
refine ⟨N, trivial, fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [Set.mem_Ioi] at hx
have hx₀ : 0 < x := (Nat.cast_nonneg N).trans_lt hx
rw [Set.mem_Ici, le_div_iff (pow_pos hx₀ _), ← le_div_iff' hC₀]
calc
x ^ n ≤ ⌈x⌉₊ ^ n := mod_cast pow_le_pow_left hx₀.le (Nat.le_ceil _) _
_ ≤ exp ⌈x⌉₊ / (exp 1 * C) := mod_cast (hN _ (Nat.lt_ceil.2 hx).le).le
_ ≤ exp (x + 1) / (exp 1 * C) := by gcongr; exact (Nat.ceil_lt_add_one hx₀.le).le
_ = exp x / C := by rw [add_comm, exp_add, mul_div_mul_left _ _ (exp_pos _).ne']
#align real.tendsto_exp_div_pow_at_top Real.tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop
/-- The function `x^n * exp(-x)` tends to `0` at `+∞`, for any natural number `n`. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_mul_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero (n : ℕ) :
Tendsto (fun x => x ^ n * exp (-x)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
(tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp (tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop n)).congr fun x => by
rw [comp_apply, inv_eq_one_div, div_div_eq_mul_div, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, exp_neg]
#align real.tendsto_pow_mul_exp_neg_at_top_nhds_0 Real.tendsto_pow_mul_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-31")]
alias tendsto_pow_mul_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_0 := tendsto_pow_mul_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero
/-- The function `(b * exp x + c) / (x ^ n)` tends to `+∞` at `+∞`, for any natural number
`n` and any real numbers `b` and `c` such that `b` is positive. -/
theorem tendsto_mul_exp_add_div_pow_atTop (b c : ℝ) (n : ℕ) (hb : 0 < b) :
Tendsto (fun x => (b * exp x + c) / x ^ n) atTop atTop := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp only [pow_zero, div_one]
exact (tendsto_exp_atTop.const_mul_atTop hb).atTop_add tendsto_const_nhds
simp only [add_div, mul_div_assoc]
exact
((tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop n).const_mul_atTop hb).atTop_add
(tendsto_const_nhds.div_atTop (tendsto_pow_atTop hn))
#align real.tendsto_mul_exp_add_div_pow_at_top Real.tendsto_mul_exp_add_div_pow_atTop
/-- The function `(x ^ n) / (b * exp x + c)` tends to `0` at `+∞`, for any natural number
`n` and any real numbers `b` and `c` such that `b` is nonzero. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Exp.lean | 298 | 311 | theorem tendsto_div_pow_mul_exp_add_atTop (b c : ℝ) (n : ℕ) (hb : 0 ≠ b) :
Tendsto (fun x => x ^ n / (b * exp x + c)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by |
have H : ∀ d e, 0 < d → Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x ^ n / (d * exp x + e)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
intro b' c' h
convert (tendsto_mul_exp_add_div_pow_atTop b' c' n h).inv_tendsto_atTop using 1
ext x
simp
cases' lt_or_gt_of_ne hb with h h
· exact H b c h
· convert (H (-b) (-c) (neg_pos.mpr h)).neg using 1
· ext x
field_simp
rw [← neg_add (b * exp x) c, neg_div_neg_eq]
· rw [neg_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Discriminant
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Eisenstein.IsIntegral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Norm
#align_import number_theory.cyclotomic.rat from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b353176c24d96c23f0ce1cc63efc3f55019702d9"
/-!
# Ring of integers of `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic fields
We gather results about cyclotomic extensions of `ℚ`. In particular, we compute the ring of
integers of a `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow`: if `K` is a
`p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the integral closure of
`ℤ` in `K`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow`: the integral
closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is `CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.absdiscr_prime_pow` and related results: the absolute discriminant
of cyclotomic fields.
-/
universe u
open Algebra IsCyclotomicExtension Polynomial NumberField
open scoped Cyclotomic Nat
variable {p : ℕ+} {k : ℕ} {K : Type u} [Field K] [CharZero K] {ζ : K} [hp : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime]
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_ne_two' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hk : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ (k + 1) : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ k * ((p - 1) * (k + 1) - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow_ne_two hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ (k + 1)).pos) hk]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.discr_prime_pow_ne_two' IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow_ne_two'
theorem discr_odd_prime' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = (-1) ^ (((p : ℕ) - 1) / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) - 2) := by
rw [← discr_odd_prime hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat hp.out.pos) hodd]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.discr_odd_prime' IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_odd_prime'
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. Beware that in the cases `p ^ k = 1` and
`p ^ k = 2` the formula uses `1 / 2 = 0` and `0 - 1 = 0`. It is useful only to have a uniform
result. See also `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ k : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ (k - 1) * ((p - 1) * k - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.discr_prime_pow' IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow'
/-- If `p` is a prime and `IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} K L`, then there are `u : ℤˣ` and
`n : ℕ` such that the discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1` is `u * p ^ n`. Often this is
enough and less cumbersome to use than `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
∃ (u : ℤˣ) (n : ℕ), discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = u * p ^ n := by
rw [hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm]
exact discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow'
/-- If `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the
integral closure of `ℤ` in `K`. -/
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
refine ⟨Subtype.val_injective, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
swap
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact
IsIntegral.algebraMap
((le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral.1
(adjoin_le_integralClosure (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos))).isIntegral _)
let B := hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ
have hint : IsIntegral ℤ B.gen := (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos).sub isIntegral_one
-- Porting note: the following `haveI` was not needed because the locale `cyclotomic` set it
-- as instances.
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.finiteDimensional {p ^ k} ℚ K
have H := discr_mul_isIntegral_mem_adjoin ℚ hint h
obtain ⟨u, n, hun⟩ := discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' hζ
rw [hun] at H
replace H := Subalgebra.smul_mem _ H u.inv
-- Porting note: the proof is slightly different because of coercions.
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_mul_assoc, Units.inv_eq_val_inv, zsmul_eq_mul, ← Int.cast_mul,
Units.inv_mul, Int.cast_one, one_mul, smul_def, map_pow] at H
cases k
· haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
have : x ∈ (⊥ : Subalgebra ℚ K) := by
rw [singleton_one ℚ K]
exact mem_top
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := mem_bot.1 this
replace h := (isIntegral_algebraMap_iff (algebraMap ℚ K).injective).1 h
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := IsIntegrallyClosed.isIntegral_iff.1 h
rw [← hz, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
exact Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ _
· have hmin : (minpoly ℤ B.gen).IsEisensteinAt (Submodule.span ℤ {((p : ℕ) : ℤ)}) := by
have h₁ := minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hint
have h₂ := hζ.minpoly_sub_one_eq_cyclotomic_comp (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ _).pos)
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen] at h₁
rw [h₁, ← map_cyclotomic_int, show Int.castRingHom ℚ = algebraMap ℤ ℚ by rfl,
show X + 1 = map (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (X + 1) by simp, ← map_comp] at h₂
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen,
map_injective (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (algebraMap ℤ ℚ).injective_int h₂]
exact cyclotomic_prime_pow_comp_X_add_one_isEisensteinAt p _
refine
adjoin_le ?_
(mem_adjoin_of_smul_prime_pow_smul_of_minpoly_isEisensteinAt (n := n)
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out) hint h (by simpa using H) hmin)
simp only [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ _) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.is_integral_closure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
rw [← pow_one p] at hζ hcycl
exact isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.is_integral_closure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime
/-- The integral closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is
`CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`. -/
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ) := by
have hζ := zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ)
refine ⟨IsFractionRing.injective _ _, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
-- Porting note: having `.isIntegral_iff` inside the definition of `this` causes an error.
· have := isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := this.isIntegral_iff.1 h
refine adjoin_mono ?_ y.2
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact hζ.pow_eq_one
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact IsIntegral.algebraMap ((IsCyclotomicExtension.integral {p ^ k} ℤ _).isIntegral _)
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.cyclotomic_ring_is_integral_closure_of_prime_pow IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing p ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField p ℚ) := by
rw [← pow_one p]
exact cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.rat.cyclotomic_ring_is_integral_closure_of_prime IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime
end IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
section PowerBasis
open IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
namespace IsPrimitiveRoot
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ k`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
[IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
let _ := isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
IsIntegralClosure.equiv ℤ (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) K (𝓞 K)
#align is_primitive_root.adjoin_equiv_ring_of_integers IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- The ring of integers of a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance IsCyclotomicExtension.ringOfIntegers [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.ring_of_integers IsPrimitiveRoot.IsCyclotomicExtension.ringOfIntegers
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p ^ k`
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
(Algebra.adjoin.powerBasis' (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos)).map hζ.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
#align is_primitive_root.integral_power_basis IsPrimitiveRoot.integralPowerBasis
/-- Abbreviation to see a primitive root of unity as a member of the ring of integers. -/
abbrev toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : 𝓞 K := ⟨ζ, hζ.isIntegral k.pos⟩
lemma toInteger_isPrimitiveRoot {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
IsPrimitiveRoot hζ.toInteger k :=
IsPrimitiveRoot.of_map_of_injective (by exact hζ) RingOfIntegers.coe_injective
-- Porting note: the proof changed because `simp` unfolds too much.
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = hζ.toInteger :=
Subtype.ext <| show algebraMap _ K hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = _ by
rw [integralPowerBasis, PowerBasis.map_gen, adjoin.powerBasis'_gen]
simp only [adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers_apply, IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_lift]
rfl
#align is_primitive_root.integral_power_basis_gen IsPrimitiveRoot.integralPowerBasis_gen
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Rat.lean | 201 | 203 | theorem integralPowerBasis_dim [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : hζ.integralPowerBasis.dim = φ (p ^ k) := by |
simp [integralPowerBasis, ← cyclotomic_eq_minpoly hζ, natDegree_cyclotomic]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.SimplicialObject
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Products
#align_import algebraic_topology.split_simplicial_object from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dd1f8496baa505636a82748e6b652165ea888733"
/-!
# Split simplicial objects
In this file, we introduce the notion of split simplicial object.
If `C` is a category that has finite coproducts, a splitting
`s : Splitting X` of a simplicial object `X` in `C` consists
of the datum of a sequence of objects `s.N : ℕ → C` (which
we shall refer to as "nondegenerate simplices") and a
sequence of morphisms `s.ι n : s.N n → X _[n]` that have
the property that a certain canonical map identifies `X _[n]`
with the coproduct of objects `s.N i` indexed by all possible
epimorphisms `[n] ⟶ [i]` in `SimplexCategory`. (We do not
assume that the morphisms `s.ι n` are monomorphisms: in the
most common categories, this would be a consequence of the
axioms.)
Simplicial objects equipped with a splitting form a category
`SimplicialObject.Split C`.
## References
* [Stacks: Splitting simplicial objects] https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/017O
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite SimplexCategory
open Simplicial
universe u
variable {C : Type*} [Category C]
namespace SimplicialObject
namespace Splitting
/-- The index set which appears in the definition of split simplicial objects. -/
def IndexSet (Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) :=
ΣΔ' : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ, { α : Δ.unop ⟶ Δ'.unop // Epi α }
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet
namespace IndexSet
/-- The element in `Splitting.IndexSet Δ` attached to an epimorphism `f : Δ ⟶ Δ'`. -/
@[simps]
def mk {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategory} (f : Δ ⟶ Δ') [Epi f] : IndexSet (op Δ) :=
⟨op Δ', f, inferInstance⟩
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.mk SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.mk
variable {Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (A : IndexSet Δ)
/-- The epimorphism in `SimplexCategory` associated to `A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ` -/
def e :=
A.2.1
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.e SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.e
instance : Epi A.e :=
A.2.2
theorem ext' : A = ⟨A.1, ⟨A.e, A.2.2⟩⟩ := rfl
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.ext' SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.ext'
theorem ext (A₁ A₂ : IndexSet Δ) (h₁ : A₁.1 = A₂.1) (h₂ : A₁.e ≫ eqToHom (by rw [h₁]) = A₂.e) :
A₁ = A₂ := by
rcases A₁ with ⟨Δ₁, ⟨α₁, hα₁⟩⟩
rcases A₂ with ⟨Δ₂, ⟨α₂, hα₂⟩⟩
simp only at h₁
subst h₁
simp only [eqToHom_refl, comp_id, IndexSet.e] at h₂
simp only [h₂]
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.ext SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.ext
instance : Fintype (IndexSet Δ) :=
Fintype.ofInjective
(fun A =>
⟨⟨A.1.unop.len, Nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr (len_le_of_epi (inferInstance : Epi A.e))⟩,
A.e.toOrderHom⟩ :
IndexSet Δ → Sigma fun k : Fin (Δ.unop.len + 1) => Fin (Δ.unop.len + 1) → Fin (k + 1))
(by
rintro ⟨Δ₁, α₁⟩ ⟨Δ₂, α₂⟩ h₁
induction' Δ₁ using Opposite.rec with Δ₁
induction' Δ₂ using Opposite.rec with Δ₂
simp only [unop_op, Sigma.mk.inj_iff, Fin.mk.injEq] at h₁
have h₂ : Δ₁ = Δ₂ := by
ext1
simpa only [Fin.mk_eq_mk] using h₁.1
subst h₂
refine ext _ _ rfl ?_
ext : 2
exact eq_of_heq h₁.2)
variable (Δ)
/-- The distinguished element in `Splitting.IndexSet Δ` which corresponds to the
identity of `Δ`. -/
@[simps]
def id : IndexSet Δ :=
⟨Δ, ⟨𝟙 _, by infer_instance⟩⟩
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.id SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.id
instance : Inhabited (IndexSet Δ) :=
⟨id Δ⟩
variable {Δ}
/-- The condition that an element `Splitting.IndexSet Δ` is the distinguished
element `Splitting.IndexSet.Id Δ`. -/
@[simp]
def EqId : Prop :=
A = id _
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.eq_id SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.EqId
theorem eqId_iff_eq : A.EqId ↔ A.1 = Δ := by
constructor
· intro h
dsimp at h
rw [h]
rfl
· intro h
rcases A with ⟨_, ⟨f, hf⟩⟩
simp only at h
subst h
refine ext _ _ rfl ?_
haveI := hf
simp only [eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
exact eq_id_of_epi f
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.eq_id_iff_eq SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.eqId_iff_eq
theorem eqId_iff_len_eq : A.EqId ↔ A.1.unop.len = Δ.unop.len := by
rw [eqId_iff_eq]
constructor
· intro h
rw [h]
· intro h
rw [← unop_inj_iff]
ext
exact h
#align simplicial_object.splitting.index_set.eq_id_iff_len_eq SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.eqId_iff_len_eq
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/SplitSimplicialObject.lean | 154 | 159 | theorem eqId_iff_len_le : A.EqId ↔ Δ.unop.len ≤ A.1.unop.len := by |
rw [eqId_iff_len_eq]
constructor
· intro h
rw [h]
· exact le_antisymm (len_le_of_epi (inferInstance : Epi A.e))
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
#align_import data.polynomial.degree.trailing_degree from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"302eab4f46abb63de520828de78c04cb0f9b5836"
/-!
# Trailing degree of univariate polynomials
## Main definitions
* `trailingDegree p`: the multiplicity of `X` in the polynomial `p`
* `natTrailingDegree`: a variant of `trailingDegree` that takes values in the natural numbers
* `trailingCoeff`: the coefficient at index `natTrailingDegree p`
Converts most results about `degree`, `natDegree` and `leadingCoeff` to results about the bottom
end of a polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Polynomial Finsupp Finset
open scoped Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `trailingDegree p` is the multiplicity of `x` in the polynomial `p`, i.e. the smallest
`X`-exponent in `p`.
`trailingDegree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the smallest power of `X` that appears
in `p`, otherwise
`trailingDegree 0 = ⊤`. -/
def trailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ∞ :=
p.support.min
#align polynomial.trailing_degree Polynomial.trailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => trailingDegree p < trailingDegree q :=
InvImage.wf trailingDegree wellFounded_lt
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_lt_wf Polynomial.trailingDegree_lt_wf
/-- `natTrailingDegree p` forces `trailingDegree p` to `ℕ`, by defining
`natTrailingDegree ⊤ = 0`. -/
def natTrailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(trailingDegree p).getD 0
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.natTrailingDegree
/-- `trailingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the smallest power of `X` in `p`-/
def trailingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natTrailingDegree p)
#align polynomial.trailing_coeff Polynomial.trailingCoeff
/-- a polynomial is `monic_at` if its trailing coefficient is 1 -/
def TrailingMonic (p : R[X]) :=
trailingCoeff p = (1 : R)
#align polynomial.trailing_monic Polynomial.TrailingMonic
theorem TrailingMonic.def : TrailingMonic p ↔ trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_monic.def Polynomial.TrailingMonic.def
instance TrailingMonic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (TrailingMonic p) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Decidable (trailingCoeff p = (1 : R))
#align polynomial.trailing_monic.decidable Polynomial.TrailingMonic.decidable
@[simp]
theorem TrailingMonic.trailingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.TrailingMonic) : trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
#align polynomial.trailing_monic.trailing_coeff Polynomial.TrailingMonic.trailingCoeff
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_zero : trailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_zero Polynomial.trailingDegree_zero
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_zero : trailingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_coeff_zero Polynomial.trailingCoeff_zero
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_zero : natTrailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_zero Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_zero
theorem trailingDegree_eq_top : trailingDegree p = ⊤ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.min_eq_top.1 h), fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_top Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_top
theorem trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree p = (natTrailingDegree p : ℕ∞) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ :=
not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt trailingDegree_eq_top.1 hp))
have hn : trailingDegree p = n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natTrailingDegree, hn]
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
exact WithTop.coe_eq_coe
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_iff_nat_trailing_degree_eq Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
constructor
· intro H
rwa [← trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq]
rintro rfl
rw [trailingDegree_zero] at H
exact Option.noConfusion H
· intro H
rwa [trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq]
rintro rfl
rw [natTrailingDegree_zero] at H
rw [H] at hn
exact lt_irrefl _ hn
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_iff_nat_trailing_degree_eq_of_pos Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_of_pos
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ}
(h : trailingDegree p = n) : natTrailingDegree p = n :=
have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := fun hp0 => by rw [hp0] at h; exact Option.noConfusion h
Option.some_inj.1 <|
show (natTrailingDegree p : ℕ∞) = n by rwa [← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp0]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_eq_of_trailing_degree_eq_some Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree : ↑(natTrailingDegree p) ≤ trailingDegree p := by
by_cases hp : p = 0;
· rw [hp, trailingDegree_zero]
exact le_top
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_trailing_degree Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]}
(h : trailingDegree p = trailingDegree q) : natTrailingDegree p = natTrailingDegree q := by
unfold natTrailingDegree
rw [h]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_eq_of_trailing_degree_eq Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq
theorem trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : trailingDegree p ≤ n :=
show @LE.le ℕ∞ _ p.support.min n from min_le (mem_support_iff.2 h)
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_of_ne_zero Polynomial.trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree p ≤ n := by
have : WithTop.some (natTrailingDegree p) = Nat.cast (natTrailingDegree p) := rfl
rw [← WithTop.coe_le_coe, this, ← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree]
· exact trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
· intro h
subst h
exact h rfl
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_of_ne_zero Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro h
by_contra hp
obtain ⟨n, hpn, hn⟩ := by simpa using min_mem_image_coe $ support_nonempty.2 hp
obtain rfl := (trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq hp).1 hn.symm
exact hpn h
· rintro rfl
simp
lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not
@[simp] lemma natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : natTrailingDegree p = 0 ↔ p = 0 ∨ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := by
constructor
· rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
rintro h hp
rwa [← h, coeff_natTrailingDegree_ne_zero]
· rintro (rfl | h)
· simp
· exact nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 $ natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
lemma trailingDegree_eq_zero : trailingDegree p = 0 ↔ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := by
obtain rfl | hp := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [WithTop.top_ne_zero (α := ℕ)]
· exact (trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq hp).trans $
natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.trans $ or_iff_right hp
lemma natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : natTrailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not.trans $ by rw [not_or, not_ne_iff]
lemma trailingDegree_ne_zero : trailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
trailingDegree_eq_zero.not_left
@[simp] theorem trailingDegree_le_trailingDegree (h : coeff q (natTrailingDegree p) ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree q ≤ trailingDegree p := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp]
exact le_top
· rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
exact trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_le_trailing_degree Polynomial.trailingDegree_le_trailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_ne_of_natTrailingDegree_ne {n : ℕ} :
p.natTrailingDegree ≠ n → trailingDegree p ≠ n := by
-- Porting note: Needed to account for different coercion behaviour & add the lemma below
have : Nat.cast n = WithTop.some n := rfl
exact mt fun h => by rw [natTrailingDegree, h, this, ← WithTop.some_eq_coe, Option.getD_some]
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_ne_of_nat_trailing_degree_ne Polynomial.trailingDegree_ne_of_natTrailingDegree_ne
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_trailingDegree_le {n : ℕ} {hp : p ≠ 0}
(H : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree p) : n ≤ natTrailingDegree p := by
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp] at H
exact WithTop.coe_le_coe.mp H
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_of_trailing_degree_le Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_of_trailingDegree_le
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natTrailingDegree {hq : q ≠ 0}
(hpq : p.trailingDegree ≤ q.trailingDegree) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ q.natTrailingDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0;
· rw [hp, natTrailingDegree_zero]
exact zero_le _
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq] at hpq
exact WithTop.coe_le_coe.1 hpq
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_natTrailingDegree
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [trailingDegree, support_monomial n ha, min_singleton]
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_monomial Polynomial.trailingDegree_monomial
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
rfl
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_monomial Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_monomial
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial_le : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (natTrailingDegree_monomial ha).le
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_monomial_le Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
theorem le_trailingDegree_monomial : ↑n ≤ trailingDegree (monomial n a) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (trailingDegree_monomial ha).ge
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_monomial Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_monomial
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a) = (0 : ℕ∞) :=
trailingDegree_monomial ha
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_C Polynomial.trailingDegree_C
theorem le_trailingDegree_C : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_C Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_C
theorem trailingDegree_one_le : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (1 : R[X]) := by
rw [← C_1]
exact le_trailingDegree_C
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_one_le Polynomial.trailingDegree_one_le
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_C (a : R) : natTrailingDegree (C a) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_C Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_C
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_one : natTrailingDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_C 1
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_one Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_one
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natTrailingDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natTrailingDegree_C]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_nat_cast Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias natTrailingDegree_nat_cast := natTrailingDegree_natCast
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow
theorem le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
(n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
exact le_trailingDegree_monomial
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree (h : (n : ℕ∞) < trailingDegree p) : coeff p n = 0 :=
Classical.not_not.1 (mt trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (not_le_of_gt h))
#align polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_trailing_degree_lt Polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : n < p.natTrailingDegree) :
p.coeff n = 0 := by
apply coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, trailingDegree_zero]
exact WithTop.coe_lt_top n
· rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
exact WithTop.coe_lt_coe.2 h
#align polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natTrailingDegree_pred_eq_zero {p : R[X]} {hp : (0 : ℕ∞) < natTrailingDegree p} :
p.coeff (p.natTrailingDegree - 1) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree <|
Nat.sub_lt ((WithTop.zero_lt_coe (natTrailingDegree p)).mp hp) Nat.one_pos
#align polynomial.coeff_nat_trailing_degree_pred_eq_zero Polynomial.coeff_natTrailingDegree_pred_eq_zero
theorem le_trailingDegree_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (X ^ n : R[X]) := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow n (1 : R)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_X_pow Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_X_pow
theorem le_trailingDegree_X : (1 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (X : R[X]) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_X Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_X
theorem natTrailingDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natTrailingDegree ≤ 1 :=
natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_X_le Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_X_le
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_eq_zero : trailingCoeff p = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
_root_.by_contradiction fun hp =>
mt mem_support_iff.1 (Classical.not_not.2 h)
(mem_of_min (trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp)),
fun h => h.symm ▸ leadingCoeff_zero⟩
#align polynomial.trailing_coeff_eq_zero Polynomial.trailingCoeff_eq_zero
theorem trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero : trailingCoeff p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
not_congr trailingCoeff_eq_zero
#align polynomial.trailing_coeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero Polynomial.trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero
theorem natTrailingDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero : p ≠ 0 → natTrailingDegree p ∈ p.support :=
mem_support_iff.mpr ∘ trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero.mpr
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_mem_support_of_nonzero Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_mem_supp (a : ℕ) : a ∈ p.support → natTrailingDegree p ≤ a :=
natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero ∘ mem_support_iff.mp
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_of_mem_supp Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_of_mem_supp
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min' (h : p ≠ 0) :
natTrailingDegree p = p.support.min' (nonempty_support_iff.mpr h) := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply le_min'
intro y hy
exact natTrailingDegree_le_of_mem_supp y hy
· apply Finset.min'_le
exact mem_support_iff.mpr (trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero.mpr h)
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_eq_support_min' Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min'
theorem le_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) (hn : ∀ m < n, p.coeff m = 0) :
n ≤ p.natTrailingDegree := by
rw [natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min' hp]
exact Finset.le_min' _ _ _ fun m hm => not_lt.1 fun hmn => mem_support_iff.1 hm <| hn _ hmn
#align polynomial.le_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.le_natTrailingDegree
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree (p : R[X]) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ p.natDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, natDegree_zero, natTrailingDegree_zero]
· exact le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (mt trailingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp)
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_nat_degree Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree
theorem natTrailingDegree_mul_X_pow {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(p * X ^ n).natTrailingDegree = p.natTrailingDegree + n := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero fun h => mt trailingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp ?_
rwa [trailingCoeff, ← coeff_mul_X_pow]
· rw [natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min' fun h => hp (mul_X_pow_eq_zero h), Finset.le_min'_iff]
intro y hy
have key : n ≤ y := by
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_mul_X_pow'] at hy
exact by_contra fun h => hy (if_neg h)
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_mul_X_pow', if_pos key] at hy
exact (le_tsub_iff_right key).mp (natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero hy)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_mul_X_pow Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_mul_X_pow
theorem le_trailingDegree_mul : p.trailingDegree + q.trailingDegree ≤ (p * q).trailingDegree := by
refine Finset.le_min fun n hn => ?_
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_mul] at hn
obtain ⟨⟨i, j⟩, hij, hpq⟩ := exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero hn
refine
(add_le_add (min_le (mem_support_iff.mpr (left_ne_zero_of_mul hpq)))
(min_le (mem_support_iff.mpr (right_ne_zero_of_mul hpq)))).trans
(le_of_eq ?_)
rwa [← WithTop.coe_add, WithTop.coe_eq_coe, ← mem_antidiagonal]
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_mul Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_mul
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/TrailingDegree.lean | 406 | 416 | theorem le_natTrailingDegree_mul (h : p * q ≠ 0) :
p.natTrailingDegree + q.natTrailingDegree ≤ (p * q).natTrailingDegree := by |
have hp : p ≠ 0 := fun hp => h (by rw [hp, zero_mul])
have hq : q ≠ 0 := fun hq => h (by rw [hq, mul_zero])
-- Porting note: Needed to account for different coercion behaviour & add the lemma below
have : ∀ (p : R[X]), WithTop.some (natTrailingDegree p) = Nat.cast (natTrailingDegree p) :=
fun p ↦ rfl
rw [← WithTop.coe_le_coe, WithTop.coe_add, this p, this q, this (p * q),
← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, ← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq,
← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree h]
exact le_trailingDegree_mul
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johanes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Kevin Wilson, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Basic
#align_import order.filter.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d6fad0e5bf2d6f48da9175d25c3dc5706b3834ce"
/-!
# Product and coproduct filters
In this file we define `Filter.prod f g` (notation: `f ×ˢ g`) and `Filter.coprod f g`. The product
of two filters is the largest filter `l` such that `Filter.Tendsto Prod.fst l f` and
`Filter.Tendsto Prod.snd l g`.
## Implementation details
The product filter cannot be defined using the monad structure on filters. For example:
```lean
F := do {x ← seq, y ← top, return (x, y)}
G := do {y ← top, x ← seq, return (x, y)}
```
hence:
```lean
s ∈ F ↔ ∃ n, [n..∞] × univ ⊆ s
s ∈ G ↔ ∀ i:ℕ, ∃ n, [n..∞] × {i} ⊆ s
```
Now `⋃ i, [i..∞] × {i}` is in `G` but not in `F`.
As product filter we want to have `F` as result.
## Notations
* `f ×ˢ g` : `Filter.prod f g`, localized in `Filter`.
-/
open Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
/-- Product of filters. This is the filter generated by cartesian products
of elements of the component filters. -/
protected def prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : Filter (α × β) :=
f.comap Prod.fst ⊓ g.comap Prod.snd
#align filter.prod Filter.prod
instance instSProd : SProd (Filter α) (Filter β) (Filter (α × β)) where
sprod := Filter.prod
theorem prod_mem_prod (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
#align filter.prod_mem_prod Filter.prod_mem_prod
theorem mem_prod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ×ˢ t₂ ⊆ s := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, fun p ⟨h, h'⟩ => ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h
#align filter.mem_prod_iff Filter.mem_prod_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_mem_prod_iff [f.NeBot] [g.NeBot] : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_s', hs', _t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h
(prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(fun ⟨hs's, ht't⟩ => ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩) fun h =>
h.elim (fun hs'e => absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty) fun ht'e =>
absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty,
fun h => prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
#align filter.prod_mem_prod_iff Filter.prod_mem_prod_iff
theorem mem_prod_principal {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ 𝓟 t ↔ { a | ∀ b ∈ t, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← @exists_mem_subset_iff _ f, mem_prod_iff]
refine exists_congr fun u => Iff.rfl.and ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨t, mem_principal_self t, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨v, v_in, hv⟩ a a_in b b_in
exact hv (mk_mem_prod a_in <| v_in b_in)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩
exact h hx y hy
#align filter.mem_prod_principal Filter.mem_prod_principal
theorem mem_prod_top {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) ↔ { a | ∀ b, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_univ, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left]
#align filter.mem_prod_top Filter.mem_prod_top
theorem eventually_prod_principal_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {s : Set β} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x : α in f, ∀ y : β, y ∈ s → p (x, y) := by
rw [eventually_iff, eventually_iff, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
#align filter.eventually_prod_principal_iff Filter.eventually_prod_principal_iff
theorem comap_prod (f : α → β × γ) (b : Filter β) (c : Filter γ) :
comap f (b ×ˢ c) = comap (Prod.fst ∘ f) b ⊓ comap (Prod.snd ∘ f) c := by
erw [comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Filter.comap_comap]
#align filter.comap_prod Filter.comap_prod
theorem prod_top : f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) = f.comap Prod.fst := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_top, inf_top_eq]
#align filter.prod_top Filter.prod_top
theorem top_prod : (⊤ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = g.comap Prod.snd := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_top, top_inf_eq]
theorem sup_prod (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : (f₁ ⊔ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊔ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_sup, inf_sup_right, ← Filter.prod, ← Filter.prod]
#align filter.sup_prod Filter.sup_prod
theorem prod_sup (f : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊔ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_sup, inf_sup_left, ← Filter.prod, ← Filter.prod]
#align filter.prod_sup Filter.prod_sup
theorem eventually_prod_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔
∃ pa : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f, pa x) ∧ ∃ pb : β → Prop, (∀ᶠ y in g, pb y) ∧
∀ {x}, pa x → ∀ {y}, pb y → p (x, y) := by
simpa only [Set.prod_subset_iff] using @mem_prod_iff α β p f g
#align filter.eventually_prod_iff Filter.eventually_prod_iff
theorem tendsto_fst : Tendsto Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) f :=
tendsto_inf_left tendsto_comap
#align filter.tendsto_fst Filter.tendsto_fst
theorem tendsto_snd : Tendsto Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) g :=
tendsto_inf_right tendsto_comap
#align filter.tendsto_snd Filter.tendsto_snd
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its first component tends to
`g`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.fst {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).1) f g :=
tendsto_fst.comp H
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its second component tends to
`h`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.snd {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).2) f h :=
tendsto_snd.comp H
theorem Tendsto.prod_mk {h : Filter γ} {m₁ : α → β} {m₂ : α → γ}
(h₁ : Tendsto m₁ f g) (h₂ : Tendsto m₂ f h) : Tendsto (fun x => (m₁ x, m₂ x)) f (g ×ˢ h) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
#align filter.tendsto.prod_mk Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk
theorem tendsto_prod_swap : Tendsto (Prod.swap : α × β → β × α) (f ×ˢ g) (g ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_snd.prod_mk tendsto_fst
#align filter.tendsto_prod_swap Filter.tendsto_prod_swap
theorem Eventually.prod_inl {la : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in la, p x) (lb : Filter β) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).1 :=
tendsto_fst.eventually h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inl Filter.Eventually.prod_inl
theorem Eventually.prod_inr {lb : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in lb, p x) (la : Filter α) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).2 :=
tendsto_snd.eventually h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inr Filter.Eventually.prod_inr
theorem Eventually.prod_mk {la : Filter α} {pa : α → Prop} (ha : ∀ᶠ x in la, pa x) {lb : Filter β}
{pb : β → Prop} (hb : ∀ᶠ y in lb, pb y) : ∀ᶠ p in la ×ˢ lb, pa (p : α × β).1 ∧ pb p.2 :=
(ha.prod_inl lb).and (hb.prod_inr la)
#align filter.eventually.prod_mk Filter.Eventually.prod_mk
theorem EventuallyEq.prod_map {δ} {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa =ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb =ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb =ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
(Eventually.prod_mk ha hb).mono fun _ h => Prod.ext h.1 h.2
#align filter.eventually_eq.prod_map Filter.EventuallyEq.prod_map
theorem EventuallyLE.prod_map {δ} [LE γ] [LE δ] {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa ≤ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb ≤ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb ≤ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
Eventually.prod_mk ha hb
#align filter.eventually_le.prod_map Filter.EventuallyLE.prod_map
theorem Eventually.curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in la, ∀ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y) := by
rcases eventually_prod_iff.1 h with ⟨pa, ha, pb, hb, h⟩
exact ha.mono fun a ha => hb.mono fun b hb => h ha hb
#align filter.eventually.curry Filter.Eventually.curry
protected lemma Frequently.uncurry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p x y) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy.1 xy.2 :=
mt (fun h ↦ by simpa only [not_frequently] using h.curry) h
/-- A fact that is eventually true about all pairs `l ×ˢ l` is eventually true about
all diagonal pairs `(i, i)` -/
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod {p : α × α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ i in f ×ˢ f, p i) :
∀ᶠ i in f, p (i, i) := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
apply (ht.and hs).mono fun x hx => hst hx.1 hx.2
#align filter.eventually.diag_of_prod Filter.Eventually.diag_of_prod
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_left {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : (α × α) × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in (f ×ˢ f) ×ˢ g, p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p ((x.1, x.1), x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.diag_of_prod.prod_mk hs).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
#align filter.eventually.diag_of_prod_left Filter.Eventually.diag_of_prod_left
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_right {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : α × γ × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ g), p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p (x.1, x.2, x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.prod_mk hs.diag_of_prod).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
#align filter.eventually.diag_of_prod_right Filter.Eventually.diag_of_prod_right
theorem tendsto_diag : Tendsto (fun i => (i, i)) f (f ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_iff_eventually.mpr fun _ hpr => hpr.diag_of_prod
#align filter.tendsto_diag Filter.tendsto_diag
theorem prod_iInf_left [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
(⨅ i, f i) ×ˢ g = ⨅ i, f i ×ˢ g := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_iInf, iInf_inf]
simp only [Filter.prod, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.prod_infi_left Filter.prod_iInf_left
theorem prod_iInf_right [Nonempty ι] {f : Filter α} {g : ι → Filter β} :
(f ×ˢ ⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f ×ˢ g i := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_iInf, inf_iInf]
simp only [Filter.prod, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.prod_infi_right Filter.prod_iInf_right
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem prod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ :=
inf_le_inf (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
#align filter.prod_mono Filter.prod_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (g : Filter β) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) : f₁ ×ˢ g ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g :=
Filter.prod_mono hf rfl.le
#align filter.prod_mono_left Filter.prod_mono_left
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (f : Filter α) {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : g₁ ≤ g₂) : f ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f ×ˢ g₂ :=
Filter.prod_mono rfl.le hf
#align filter.prod_mono_right Filter.prod_mono_right
theorem prod_comap_comap_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : β₁ → α₁} {m₂ : β₂ → α₂} :
comap m₁ f₁ ×ˢ comap m₂ f₂ = comap (fun p : β₁ × β₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_comap, comap_inf, (· ∘ ·)]
#align filter.prod_comap_comap_eq Filter.prod_comap_comap_eq
theorem prod_comm' : f ×ˢ g = comap Prod.swap (g ×ˢ f) := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·), inf_comm, Prod.swap, comap_inf]
#align filter.prod_comm' Filter.prod_comm'
theorem prod_comm : f ×ˢ g = map (fun p : β × α => (p.2, p.1)) (g ×ˢ f) := by
rw [prod_comm', ← map_swap_eq_comap_swap]
rfl
#align filter.prod_comm Filter.prod_comm
theorem mem_prod_iff_left {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ᶠ y in g, ∀ x ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, prod_subset_iff]
refine exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and <| Iff.trans ?_ exists_mem_subset_iff
exact exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and forall₂_swap
theorem mem_prod_iff_right {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
rw [prod_comm, mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot g] : map Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) = f := by
ext s
simp only [mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left, mem_preimage, eventually_const, ← subset_def,
exists_mem_subset_iff]
#align filter.map_fst_prod Filter.map_fst_prod
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot f] : map Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) = g := by
rw [prod_comm, map_map]; apply map_fst_prod
#align filter.map_snd_prod Filter.map_snd_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_le_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨map_fst_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_fst.mono_left h, map_snd_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_snd.mono_left h⟩,
fun h => prod_mono h.1 h.2⟩
#align filter.prod_le_prod Filter.prod_le_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_inj {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ = f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ ∧ g₁ = g₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.1 ▸ h.2 ▸ rfl⟩
have hle : f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ := prod_le_prod.1 h.le
haveI := neBot_of_le hle.1; haveI := neBot_of_le hle.2
exact ⟨hle.1.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).1, hle.2.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).2⟩
#align filter.prod_inj Filter.prod_inj
theorem eventually_swap_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ y : β × α in g ×ˢ f, p y.swap := by
rw [prod_comm]; rfl
#align filter.eventually_swap_iff Filter.eventually_swap_iff
theorem prod_assoc (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) = f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h) := by
simp_rw [← comap_equiv_symm, SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc, (· ∘ ·),
Equiv.prodAssoc_symm_apply]
#align filter.prod_assoc Filter.prod_assoc
theorem prod_assoc_symm (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) = (f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_symm, SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp, Equiv.prodAssoc_apply]
#align filter.prod_assoc_symm Filter.prod_assoc_symm
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) :=
(prod_assoc f g h).le
#align filter.tendsto_prod_assoc Filter.tendsto_prodAssoc
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc_symm {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) :=
(prod_assoc_symm f g h).le
#align filter.tendsto_prod_assoc_symm Filter.tendsto_prodAssoc_symm
/-- A useful lemma when dealing with uniformities. -/
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Prod.lean | 344 | 347 | theorem map_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
map (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k)) =
(f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k) := by |
simp_rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_inf, comap_comap]; ac_rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NAry
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.SMul
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.ListOfFn
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pi
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
#align_import data.finset.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"eba7871095e834365616b5e43c8c7bb0b37058d0"
/-!
# Pointwise operations of finsets
This file defines pointwise algebraic operations on finsets.
## Main declarations
For finsets `s` and `t`:
* `0` (`Finset.zero`): The singleton `{0}`.
* `1` (`Finset.one`): The singleton `{1}`.
* `-s` (`Finset.neg`): Negation, finset of all `-x` where `x ∈ s`.
* `s⁻¹` (`Finset.inv`): Inversion, finset of all `x⁻¹` where `x ∈ s`.
* `s + t` (`Finset.add`): Addition, finset of all `x + y` where `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`.
* `s * t` (`Finset.mul`): Multiplication, finset of all `x * y` where `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`.
* `s - t` (`Finset.sub`): Subtraction, finset of all `x - y` where `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`.
* `s / t` (`Finset.div`): Division, finset of all `x / y` where `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`.
* `s +ᵥ t` (`Finset.vadd`): Scalar addition, finset of all `x +ᵥ y` where `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`.
* `s • t` (`Finset.smul`): Scalar multiplication, finset of all `x • y` where `x ∈ s` and
`y ∈ t`.
* `s -ᵥ t` (`Finset.vsub`): Scalar subtraction, finset of all `x -ᵥ y` where `x ∈ s` and
`y ∈ t`.
* `a • s` (`Finset.smulFinset`): Scaling, finset of all `a • x` where `x ∈ s`.
* `a +ᵥ s` (`Finset.vaddFinset`): Translation, finset of all `a +ᵥ x` where `x ∈ s`.
For `α` a semigroup/monoid, `Finset α` is a semigroup/monoid.
As an unfortunate side effect, this means that `n • s`, where `n : ℕ`, is ambiguous between
pointwise scaling and repeated pointwise addition; the former has `(2 : ℕ) • {1, 2} = {2, 4}`, while
the latter has `(2 : ℕ) • {1, 2} = {2, 3, 4}`. See note [pointwise nat action].
## Implementation notes
We put all instances in the locale `Pointwise`, so that these instances are not available by
default. Note that we do not mark them as reducible (as argued by note [reducible non-instances])
since we expect the locale to be open whenever the instances are actually used (and making the
instances reducible changes the behavior of `simp`.
## Tags
finset multiplication, finset addition, pointwise addition, pointwise multiplication,
pointwise subtraction
-/
open Function MulOpposite
open scoped Pointwise
variable {F α β γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
/-! ### `0`/`1` as finsets -/
section One
variable [One α] {s : Finset α} {a : α}
/-- The finset `1 : Finset α` is defined as `{1}` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive "The finset `0 : Finset α` is defined as `{0}` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def one : One (Finset α) :=
⟨{1}⟩
#align finset.has_one Finset.one
#align finset.has_zero Finset.zero
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Finset.one Finset.zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_one : a ∈ (1 : Finset α) ↔ a = 1 :=
mem_singleton
#align finset.mem_one Finset.mem_one
#align finset.mem_zero Finset.mem_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_one : ↑(1 : Finset α) = (1 : Set α) :=
coe_singleton 1
#align finset.coe_one Finset.coe_one
#align finset.coe_zero Finset.coe_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
lemma coe_eq_one : (s : Set α) = 1 ↔ s = 1 := coe_eq_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_subset : (1 : Finset α) ⊆ s ↔ (1 : α) ∈ s :=
singleton_subset_iff
#align finset.one_subset Finset.one_subset
#align finset.zero_subset Finset.zero_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_one : ({1} : Finset α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align finset.singleton_one Finset.singleton_one
#align finset.singleton_zero Finset.singleton_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mem_one : (1 : α) ∈ (1 : Finset α) :=
mem_singleton_self _
#align finset.one_mem_one Finset.one_mem_one
#align finset.zero_mem_zero Finset.zero_mem_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty]))]
theorem one_nonempty : (1 : Finset α).Nonempty :=
⟨1, one_mem_one⟩
#align finset.one_nonempty Finset.one_nonempty
#align finset.zero_nonempty Finset.zero_nonempty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem map_one {f : α ↪ β} : map f 1 = {f 1} :=
map_singleton f 1
#align finset.map_one Finset.map_one
#align finset.map_zero Finset.map_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem image_one [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} : image f 1 = {f 1} :=
image_singleton _ _
#align finset.image_one Finset.image_one
#align finset.image_zero Finset.image_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_one_iff_eq : s ⊆ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = 1 :=
subset_singleton_iff
#align finset.subset_one_iff_eq Finset.subset_one_iff_eq
#align finset.subset_zero_iff_eq Finset.subset_zero_iff_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.subset_one_iff (h : s.Nonempty) : s ⊆ 1 ↔ s = 1 :=
h.subset_singleton_iff
#align finset.nonempty.subset_one_iff Finset.Nonempty.subset_one_iff
#align finset.nonempty.subset_zero_iff Finset.Nonempty.subset_zero_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem card_one : (1 : Finset α).card = 1 :=
card_singleton _
#align finset.card_one Finset.card_one
#align finset.card_zero Finset.card_zero
/-- The singleton operation as a `OneHom`. -/
@[to_additive "The singleton operation as a `ZeroHom`."]
def singletonOneHom : OneHom α (Finset α) where
toFun := singleton; map_one' := singleton_one
#align finset.singleton_one_hom Finset.singletonOneHom
#align finset.singleton_zero_hom Finset.singletonZeroHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_singletonOneHom : (singletonOneHom : α → Finset α) = singleton :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_singleton_one_hom Finset.coe_singletonOneHom
#align finset.coe_singleton_zero_hom Finset.coe_singletonZeroHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem singletonOneHom_apply (a : α) : singletonOneHom a = {a} :=
rfl
#align finset.singleton_one_hom_apply Finset.singletonOneHom_apply
#align finset.singleton_zero_hom_apply Finset.singletonZeroHom_apply
/-- Lift a `OneHom` to `Finset` via `image`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "Lift a `ZeroHom` to `Finset` via `image`"]
def imageOneHom [DecidableEq β] [One β] [FunLike F α β] [OneHomClass F α β] (f : F) :
OneHom (Finset α) (Finset β) where
toFun := Finset.image f
map_one' := by rw [image_one, map_one, singleton_one]
#align finset.image_one_hom Finset.imageOneHom
#align finset.image_zero_hom Finset.imageZeroHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma sup_one [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] (f : α → β) : sup 1 f = f 1 := sup_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma sup'_one [SemilatticeSup β] (f : α → β) : sup' 1 one_nonempty f = f 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inf_one [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β] (f : α → β) : inf 1 f = f 1 := inf_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inf'_one [SemilatticeInf β] (f : α → β) : inf' 1 one_nonempty f = f 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma max_one [LinearOrder α] : (1 : Finset α).max = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma min_one [LinearOrder α] : (1 : Finset α).min = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma max'_one [LinearOrder α] : (1 : Finset α).max' one_nonempty = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma min'_one [LinearOrder α] : (1 : Finset α).min' one_nonempty = 1 := rfl
end One
/-! ### Finset negation/inversion -/
section Inv
variable [DecidableEq α] [Inv α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- The pointwise inversion of finset `s⁻¹` is defined as `{x⁻¹ | x ∈ s}` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive
"The pointwise negation of finset `-s` is defined as `{-x | x ∈ s}` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def inv : Inv (Finset α) :=
⟨image Inv.inv⟩
#align finset.has_inv Finset.inv
#align finset.has_neg Finset.neg
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Finset.inv Finset.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_def : s⁻¹ = s.image fun x => x⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align finset.inv_def Finset.inv_def
#align finset.neg_def Finset.neg_def
@[to_additive]
theorem image_inv : (s.image fun x => x⁻¹) = s⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align finset.image_inv Finset.image_inv
#align finset.image_neg Finset.image_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_inv {x : α} : x ∈ s⁻¹ ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, y⁻¹ = x :=
mem_image
#align finset.mem_inv Finset.mem_inv
#align finset.mem_neg Finset.mem_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_inv (ha : a ∈ s) : a⁻¹ ∈ s⁻¹ :=
mem_image_of_mem _ ha
#align finset.inv_mem_inv Finset.inv_mem_inv
#align finset.neg_mem_neg Finset.neg_mem_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem card_inv_le : s⁻¹.card ≤ s.card :=
card_image_le
#align finset.card_inv_le Finset.card_inv_le
#align finset.card_neg_le Finset.card_neg_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_empty : (∅ : Finset α)⁻¹ = ∅ :=
image_empty _
#align finset.inv_empty Finset.inv_empty
#align finset.neg_empty Finset.neg_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty]))]
theorem inv_nonempty_iff : s⁻¹.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := image_nonempty
#align finset.inv_nonempty_iff Finset.inv_nonempty_iff
#align finset.neg_nonempty_iff Finset.neg_nonempty_iff
alias ⟨Nonempty.of_inv, Nonempty.inv⟩ := inv_nonempty_iff
#align finset.nonempty.of_inv Finset.Nonempty.of_inv
#align finset.nonempty.inv Finset.Nonempty.inv
attribute [to_additive] Nonempty.inv Nonempty.of_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_empty : s⁻¹ = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := image_eq_empty
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem inv_subset_inv (h : s ⊆ t) : s⁻¹ ⊆ t⁻¹ :=
image_subset_image h
#align finset.inv_subset_inv Finset.inv_subset_inv
#align finset.neg_subset_neg Finset.neg_subset_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α)⁻¹ = {a⁻¹} :=
image_singleton _ _
#align finset.inv_singleton Finset.inv_singleton
#align finset.neg_singleton Finset.neg_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s)⁻¹ = insert a⁻¹ s⁻¹ :=
image_insert _ _ _
#align finset.inv_insert Finset.inv_insert
#align finset.neg_insert Finset.neg_insert
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma sup_inv [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
sup s⁻¹ f = sup s (f ·⁻¹) :=
sup_image ..
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma sup'_inv [SemilatticeSup β] {s : Finset α} (hs : s⁻¹.Nonempty) (f : α → β) :
sup' s⁻¹ hs f = sup' s hs.of_inv (f ·⁻¹) :=
sup'_image ..
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inf_inv [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
inf s⁻¹ f = inf s (f ·⁻¹) :=
inf_image ..
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inf'_inv [SemilatticeInf β] {s : Finset α} (hs : s⁻¹.Nonempty) (f : α → β) :
inf' s⁻¹ hs f = inf' s hs.of_inv (f ·⁻¹) :=
inf'_image ..
@[to_additive] lemma image_op_inv (s : Finset α) : s⁻¹.image op = (s.image op)⁻¹ :=
image_comm op_inv
end Inv
open Pointwise
section InvolutiveInv
variable [DecidableEq α] [InvolutiveInv α] {s : Finset α} {a : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mem_inv' : a ∈ s⁻¹ ↔ a⁻¹ ∈ s := by simp [mem_inv, inv_eq_iff_eq_inv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_inv (s : Finset α) : ↑s⁻¹ = (s : Set α)⁻¹ := coe_image.trans Set.image_inv
#align finset.coe_inv Finset.coe_inv
#align finset.coe_neg Finset.coe_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem card_inv (s : Finset α) : s⁻¹.card = s.card := card_image_of_injective _ inv_injective
#align finset.card_inv Finset.card_inv
#align finset.card_neg Finset.card_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_inv (s : Finset α) : s.preimage (·⁻¹) inv_injective.injOn = s⁻¹ :=
coe_injective <| by rw [coe_preimage, Set.inv_preimage, coe_inv]
#align finset.preimage_inv Finset.preimage_inv
#align finset.preimage_neg Finset.preimage_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α)⁻¹ = univ := by ext; simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_inter (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t)⁻¹ = s⁻¹ ∩ t⁻¹ := coe_injective <| by simp
end InvolutiveInv
/-! ### Finset addition/multiplication -/
section Mul
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] [Mul α] [Mul β] [FunLike F α β] [MulHomClass F α β]
(f : F) {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- The pointwise multiplication of finsets `s * t` and `t` is defined as `{x * y | x ∈ s, y ∈ t}`
in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive
"The pointwise addition of finsets `s + t` is defined as `{x + y | x ∈ s, y ∈ t}` in
locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def mul : Mul (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· * ·)⟩
#align finset.has_mul Finset.mul
#align finset.has_add Finset.add
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Finset.mul Finset.add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_def : s * t = (s ×ˢ t).image fun p : α × α => p.1 * p.2 :=
rfl
#align finset.mul_def Finset.mul_def
#align finset.add_def Finset.add_def
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mul_product : ((s ×ˢ t).image fun x : α × α => x.fst * x.snd) = s * t :=
rfl
#align finset.image_mul_product Finset.image_mul_product
#align finset.image_add_product Finset.image_add_product
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_mul {x : α} : x ∈ s * t ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, ∃ z ∈ t, y * z = x := mem_image₂
#align finset.mem_mul Finset.mem_mul
#align finset.mem_add Finset.mem_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_mul (s t : Finset α) : (↑(s * t) : Set α) = ↑s * ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
#align finset.coe_mul Finset.coe_mul
#align finset.coe_add Finset.coe_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_mul : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a * b ∈ s * t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
#align finset.mul_mem_mul Finset.mul_mem_mul
#align finset.add_mem_add Finset.add_mem_add
@[to_additive]
theorem card_mul_le : (s * t).card ≤ s.card * t.card :=
card_image₂_le _ _ _
#align finset.card_mul_le Finset.card_mul_le
#align finset.card_add_le Finset.card_add_le
@[to_additive]
theorem card_mul_iff :
(s * t).card = s.card * t.card ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun p => p.1 * p.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
#align finset.card_mul_iff Finset.card_mul_iff
#align finset.card_add_iff Finset.card_add_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem empty_mul (s : Finset α) : ∅ * s = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
#align finset.empty_mul Finset.empty_mul
#align finset.empty_add Finset.empty_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_empty (s : Finset α) : s * ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
#align finset.mul_empty Finset.mul_empty
#align finset.add_empty Finset.add_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_empty : s * t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
#align finset.mul_eq_empty Finset.mul_eq_empty
#align finset.add_eq_empty Finset.add_eq_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty]))]
theorem mul_nonempty : (s * t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
#align finset.mul_nonempty Finset.mul_nonempty
#align finset.add_nonempty Finset.add_nonempty
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.mul : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s * t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
#align finset.nonempty.mul Finset.Nonempty.mul
#align finset.nonempty.add Finset.Nonempty.add
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.of_mul_left : (s * t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
#align finset.nonempty.of_mul_left Finset.Nonempty.of_mul_left
#align finset.nonempty.of_add_left Finset.Nonempty.of_add_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.of_mul_right : (s * t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
#align finset.nonempty.of_mul_right Finset.Nonempty.of_mul_right
#align finset.nonempty.of_add_right Finset.Nonempty.of_add_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_singleton (a : α) : s * {a} = s.image (· * a) :=
image₂_singleton_right
#align finset.mul_singleton Finset.mul_singleton
#align finset.add_singleton Finset.add_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_mul (a : α) : {a} * s = s.image (a * ·) :=
image₂_singleton_left
#align finset.singleton_mul Finset.singleton_mul
#align finset.singleton_add Finset.singleton_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem singleton_mul_singleton (a b : α) : ({a} : Finset α) * {b} = {a * b} :=
image₂_singleton
#align finset.singleton_mul_singleton Finset.singleton_mul_singleton
#align finset.singleton_add_singleton Finset.singleton_add_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem mul_subset_mul : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ * t₁ ⊆ s₂ * t₂ :=
image₂_subset
#align finset.mul_subset_mul Finset.mul_subset_mul
#align finset.add_subset_add Finset.add_subset_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_subset_mul_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s * t₁ ⊆ s * t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
#align finset.mul_subset_mul_left Finset.mul_subset_mul_left
#align finset.add_subset_add_left Finset.add_subset_add_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_subset_mul_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ * t ⊆ s₂ * t :=
image₂_subset_right
#align finset.mul_subset_mul_right Finset.mul_subset_mul_right
#align finset.add_subset_add_right Finset.add_subset_add_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_subset_iff : s * t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, x * y ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
#align finset.mul_subset_iff Finset.mul_subset_iff
#align finset.add_subset_iff Finset.add_subset_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem union_mul : (s₁ ∪ s₂) * t = s₁ * t ∪ s₂ * t :=
image₂_union_left
#align finset.union_mul Finset.union_mul
#align finset.union_add Finset.union_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_union : s * (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s * t₁ ∪ s * t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
#align finset.mul_union Finset.mul_union
#align finset.add_union Finset.add_union
@[to_additive]
theorem inter_mul_subset : s₁ ∩ s₂ * t ⊆ s₁ * t ∩ (s₂ * t) :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
#align finset.inter_mul_subset Finset.inter_mul_subset
#align finset.inter_add_subset Finset.inter_add_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inter_subset : s * (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s * t₁ ∩ (s * t₂) :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
#align finset.mul_inter_subset Finset.mul_inter_subset
#align finset.add_inter_subset Finset.add_inter_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem inter_mul_union_subset_union : s₁ ∩ s₂ * (t₁ ∪ t₂) ⊆ s₁ * t₁ ∪ s₂ * t₂ :=
image₂_inter_union_subset_union
#align finset.inter_mul_union_subset_union Finset.inter_mul_union_subset_union
#align finset.inter_add_union_subset_union Finset.inter_add_union_subset_union
@[to_additive]
theorem union_mul_inter_subset_union : (s₁ ∪ s₂) * (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s₁ * t₁ ∪ s₂ * t₂ :=
image₂_union_inter_subset_union
#align finset.union_mul_inter_subset_union Finset.union_mul_inter_subset_union
#align finset.union_add_inter_subset_union Finset.union_add_inter_subset_union
/-- If a finset `u` is contained in the product of two sets `s * t`, we can find two finsets `s'`,
`t'` such that `s' ⊆ s`, `t' ⊆ t` and `u ⊆ s' * t'`. -/
@[to_additive
"If a finset `u` is contained in the sum of two sets `s + t`, we can find two finsets
`s'`, `t'` such that `s' ⊆ s`, `t' ⊆ t` and `u ⊆ s' + t'`."]
theorem subset_mul {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s * t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' * t' :=
subset_image₂
#align finset.subset_mul Finset.subset_mul
#align finset.subset_add Finset.subset_add
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mul : (s * t).image (f : α → β) = s.image f * t.image f :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_mul f
#align finset.image_mul Finset.image_mul
#align finset.image_add Finset.image_add
/-- The singleton operation as a `MulHom`. -/
@[to_additive "The singleton operation as an `AddHom`."]
def singletonMulHom : α →ₙ* Finset α where
toFun := singleton; map_mul' _ _ := (singleton_mul_singleton _ _).symm
#align finset.singleton_mul_hom Finset.singletonMulHom
#align finset.singleton_add_hom Finset.singletonAddHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_singletonMulHom : (singletonMulHom : α → Finset α) = singleton :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_singleton_mul_hom Finset.coe_singletonMulHom
#align finset.coe_singleton_add_hom Finset.coe_singletonAddHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem singletonMulHom_apply (a : α) : singletonMulHom a = {a} :=
rfl
#align finset.singleton_mul_hom_apply Finset.singletonMulHom_apply
#align finset.singleton_add_hom_apply Finset.singletonAddHom_apply
/-- Lift a `MulHom` to `Finset` via `image`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "Lift an `AddHom` to `Finset` via `image`"]
def imageMulHom : Finset α →ₙ* Finset β where
toFun := Finset.image f
map_mul' _ _ := image_mul _
#align finset.image_mul_hom Finset.imageMulHom
#align finset.image_add_hom Finset.imageAddHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp (default + 1))]
lemma sup_mul_le [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] {s t : Finset α} {f : α → β} {a : β} :
sup (s * t) f ≤ a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, f (x * y) ≤ a :=
sup_image₂_le
@[to_additive]
lemma sup_mul_left [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
sup (s * t) f = sup s fun x ↦ sup t (f <| x * ·) :=
sup_image₂_left ..
@[to_additive]
lemma sup_mul_right [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
sup (s * t) f = sup t fun y ↦ sup s (f <| · * y) :=
sup_image₂_right ..
@[to_additive (attr := simp (default + 1))]
lemma le_inf_mul [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β] {s t : Finset α} {f : α → β} {a : β} :
a ≤ inf (s * t) f ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, a ≤ f (x * y) :=
le_inf_image₂
@[to_additive]
lemma inf_mul_left [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
inf (s * t) f = inf s fun x ↦ inf t (f <| x * ·) :=
inf_image₂_left ..
@[to_additive]
lemma inf_mul_right [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
inf (s * t) f = inf t fun y ↦ inf s (f <| · * y) :=
inf_image₂_right ..
end Mul
/-! ### Finset subtraction/division -/
section Div
variable [DecidableEq α] [Div α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- The pointwise division of finsets `s / t` is defined as `{x / y | x ∈ s, y ∈ t}` in locale
`Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive
"The pointwise subtraction of finsets `s - t` is defined as `{x - y | x ∈ s, y ∈ t}`
in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def div : Div (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· / ·)⟩
#align finset.has_div Finset.div
#align finset.has_sub Finset.sub
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Finset.div Finset.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_def : s / t = (s ×ˢ t).image fun p : α × α => p.1 / p.2 :=
rfl
#align finset.div_def Finset.div_def
#align finset.sub_def Finset.sub_def
@[to_additive]
theorem image_div_product : ((s ×ˢ t).image fun x : α × α => x.fst / x.snd) = s / t :=
rfl
#align finset.image_div_prod Finset.image_div_product
#align finset.add_image_prod Finset.image_sub_product
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_div : a ∈ s / t ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, ∃ c ∈ t, b / c = a :=
mem_image₂
#align finset.mem_div Finset.mem_div
#align finset.mem_sub Finset.mem_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_div (s t : Finset α) : (↑(s / t) : Set α) = ↑s / ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
#align finset.coe_div Finset.coe_div
#align finset.coe_sub Finset.coe_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_div : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a / b ∈ s / t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
#align finset.div_mem_div Finset.div_mem_div
#align finset.sub_mem_sub Finset.sub_mem_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_card_le : (s / t).card ≤ s.card * t.card :=
card_image₂_le _ _ _
#align finset.div_card_le Finset.div_card_le
#align finset.sub_card_le Finset.sub_card_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem empty_div (s : Finset α) : ∅ / s = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
#align finset.empty_div Finset.empty_div
#align finset.empty_sub Finset.empty_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_empty (s : Finset α) : s / ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
#align finset.div_empty Finset.div_empty
#align finset.sub_empty Finset.sub_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_eq_empty : s / t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
#align finset.div_eq_empty Finset.div_eq_empty
#align finset.sub_eq_empty Finset.sub_eq_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty]))]
theorem div_nonempty : (s / t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
#align finset.div_nonempty Finset.div_nonempty
#align finset.sub_nonempty Finset.sub_nonempty
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.div : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s / t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
#align finset.nonempty.div Finset.Nonempty.div
#align finset.nonempty.sub Finset.Nonempty.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.of_div_left : (s / t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
#align finset.nonempty.of_div_left Finset.Nonempty.of_div_left
#align finset.nonempty.of_sub_left Finset.Nonempty.of_sub_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.of_div_right : (s / t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
#align finset.nonempty.of_div_right Finset.Nonempty.of_div_right
#align finset.nonempty.of_sub_right Finset.Nonempty.of_sub_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_singleton (a : α) : s / {a} = s.image (· / a) :=
image₂_singleton_right
#align finset.div_singleton Finset.div_singleton
#align finset.sub_singleton Finset.sub_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem singleton_div (a : α) : {a} / s = s.image (a / ·) :=
image₂_singleton_left
#align finset.singleton_div Finset.singleton_div
#align finset.singleton_sub Finset.singleton_sub
-- @[to_additive (attr := simp)]
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this & the additive version
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_div_singleton (a b : α) : ({a} : Finset α) / {b} = {a / b} :=
image₂_singleton
#align finset.singleton_div_singleton Finset.singleton_div_singleton
#align finset.singleton_sub_singleton Finset.singleton_sub_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem div_subset_div : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ / t₁ ⊆ s₂ / t₂ :=
image₂_subset
#align finset.div_subset_div Finset.div_subset_div
#align finset.sub_subset_sub Finset.sub_subset_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_subset_div_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s / t₁ ⊆ s / t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
#align finset.div_subset_div_left Finset.div_subset_div_left
#align finset.sub_subset_sub_left Finset.sub_subset_sub_left
@[to_additive]
theorem div_subset_div_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ / t ⊆ s₂ / t :=
image₂_subset_right
#align finset.div_subset_div_right Finset.div_subset_div_right
#align finset.sub_subset_sub_right Finset.sub_subset_sub_right
@[to_additive]
theorem div_subset_iff : s / t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, x / y ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
#align finset.div_subset_iff Finset.div_subset_iff
#align finset.sub_subset_iff Finset.sub_subset_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem union_div : (s₁ ∪ s₂) / t = s₁ / t ∪ s₂ / t :=
image₂_union_left
#align finset.union_div Finset.union_div
#align finset.union_sub Finset.union_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_union : s / (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s / t₁ ∪ s / t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
#align finset.div_union Finset.div_union
#align finset.sub_union Finset.sub_union
@[to_additive]
theorem inter_div_subset : s₁ ∩ s₂ / t ⊆ s₁ / t ∩ (s₂ / t) :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
#align finset.inter_div_subset Finset.inter_div_subset
#align finset.inter_sub_subset Finset.inter_sub_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem div_inter_subset : s / (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s / t₁ ∩ (s / t₂) :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
#align finset.div_inter_subset Finset.div_inter_subset
#align finset.sub_inter_subset Finset.sub_inter_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem inter_div_union_subset_union : s₁ ∩ s₂ / (t₁ ∪ t₂) ⊆ s₁ / t₁ ∪ s₂ / t₂ :=
image₂_inter_union_subset_union
#align finset.inter_div_union_subset_union Finset.inter_div_union_subset_union
#align finset.inter_sub_union_subset_union Finset.inter_sub_union_subset_union
@[to_additive]
theorem union_div_inter_subset_union : (s₁ ∪ s₂) / (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s₁ / t₁ ∪ s₂ / t₂ :=
image₂_union_inter_subset_union
#align finset.union_div_inter_subset_union Finset.union_div_inter_subset_union
#align finset.union_sub_inter_subset_union Finset.union_sub_inter_subset_union
/-- If a finset `u` is contained in the product of two sets `s / t`, we can find two finsets `s'`,
`t'` such that `s' ⊆ s`, `t' ⊆ t` and `u ⊆ s' / t'`. -/
@[to_additive
"If a finset `u` is contained in the sum of two sets `s - t`, we can find two finsets
`s'`, `t'` such that `s' ⊆ s`, `t' ⊆ t` and `u ⊆ s' - t'`."]
theorem subset_div {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s / t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' / t' :=
subset_image₂
#align finset.subset_div Finset.subset_div
#align finset.subset_sub Finset.subset_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp (default + 1))]
lemma sup_div_le [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] {s t : Finset α} {f : α → β} {a : β} :
sup (s / t) f ≤ a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, f (x / y) ≤ a :=
sup_image₂_le
@[to_additive]
lemma sup_div_left [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
sup (s / t) f = sup s fun x ↦ sup t (f <| x / ·) :=
sup_image₂_left ..
@[to_additive]
lemma sup_div_right [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
sup (s / t) f = sup t fun y ↦ sup s (f <| · / y) :=
sup_image₂_right ..
@[to_additive (attr := simp (default + 1))]
lemma le_inf_div [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β] {s t : Finset α} {f : α → β} {a : β} :
a ≤ inf (s / t) f ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, a ≤ f (x / y) :=
le_inf_image₂
@[to_additive]
lemma inf_div_left [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
inf (s / t) f = inf s fun x ↦ inf t (f <| x / ·) :=
inf_image₂_left ..
@[to_additive]
lemma inf_div_right [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
inf (s / t) f = inf t fun y ↦ inf s (f <| · / y) :=
inf_image₂_right ..
end Div
/-! ### Instances -/
open Pointwise
section Instances
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
/-- Repeated pointwise addition (not the same as pointwise repeated addition!) of a `Finset`. See
note [pointwise nat action]. -/
protected def nsmul [Zero α] [Add α] : SMul ℕ (Finset α) :=
⟨nsmulRec⟩
#align finset.has_nsmul Finset.nsmul
/-- Repeated pointwise multiplication (not the same as pointwise repeated multiplication!) of a
`Finset`. See note [pointwise nat action]. -/
protected def npow [One α] [Mul α] : Pow (Finset α) ℕ :=
⟨fun s n => npowRec n s⟩
#align finset.has_npow Finset.npow
attribute [to_additive existing] Finset.npow
/-- Repeated pointwise addition/subtraction (not the same as pointwise repeated
addition/subtraction!) of a `Finset`. See note [pointwise nat action]. -/
protected def zsmul [Zero α] [Add α] [Neg α] : SMul ℤ (Finset α) :=
⟨zsmulRec⟩
#align finset.has_zsmul Finset.zsmul
/-- Repeated pointwise multiplication/division (not the same as pointwise repeated
multiplication/division!) of a `Finset`. See note [pointwise nat action]. -/
@[to_additive existing]
protected def zpow [One α] [Mul α] [Inv α] : Pow (Finset α) ℤ :=
⟨fun s n => zpowRec npowRec n s⟩
#align finset.has_zpow Finset.zpow
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Finset.nsmul Finset.npow Finset.zsmul Finset.zpow
/-- `Finset α` is a `Semigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Finset α` is an `AddSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is. "]
protected def semigroup [Semigroup α] : Semigroup (Finset α) :=
coe_injective.semigroup _ coe_mul
#align finset.semigroup Finset.semigroup
#align finset.add_semigroup Finset.addSemigroup
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup α] {s t : Finset α}
/-- `Finset α` is a `CommSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Finset α` is an `AddCommSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is. "]
protected def commSemigroup : CommSemigroup (Finset α) :=
coe_injective.commSemigroup _ coe_mul
#align finset.comm_semigroup Finset.commSemigroup
#align finset.add_comm_semigroup Finset.addCommSemigroup
@[to_additive]
theorem inter_mul_union_subset : s ∩ t * (s ∪ t) ⊆ s * t :=
image₂_inter_union_subset mul_comm
#align finset.inter_mul_union_subset Finset.inter_mul_union_subset
#align finset.inter_add_union_subset Finset.inter_add_union_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem union_mul_inter_subset : (s ∪ t) * (s ∩ t) ⊆ s * t :=
image₂_union_inter_subset mul_comm
#align finset.union_mul_inter_subset Finset.union_mul_inter_subset
#align finset.union_add_inter_subset Finset.union_add_inter_subset
end CommSemigroup
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass α]
/-- `Finset α` is a `MulOneClass` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Finset α` is an `AddZeroClass` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def mulOneClass : MulOneClass (Finset α) :=
coe_injective.mulOneClass _ (coe_singleton 1) coe_mul
#align finset.mul_one_class Finset.mulOneClass
#align finset.add_zero_class Finset.addZeroClass
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Finset.semigroup Finset.addSemigroup Finset.commSemigroup
Finset.addCommSemigroup Finset.mulOneClass Finset.addZeroClass
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_mul_left (s : Finset α) {t : Finset α} (ht : (1 : α) ∈ t) : s ⊆ s * t := fun a ha =>
mem_mul.2 ⟨a, ha, 1, ht, mul_one _⟩
#align finset.subset_mul_left Finset.subset_mul_left
#align finset.subset_add_left Finset.subset_add_left
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_mul_right {s : Finset α} (t : Finset α) (hs : (1 : α) ∈ s) : t ⊆ s * t := fun a ha =>
mem_mul.2 ⟨1, hs, a, ha, one_mul _⟩
#align finset.subset_mul_right Finset.subset_mul_right
#align finset.subset_add_right Finset.subset_add_right
/-- The singleton operation as a `MonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "The singleton operation as an `AddMonoidHom`."]
def singletonMonoidHom : α →* Finset α :=
{ singletonMulHom, singletonOneHom with }
#align finset.singleton_monoid_hom Finset.singletonMonoidHom
#align finset.singleton_add_monoid_hom Finset.singletonAddMonoidHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_singletonMonoidHom : (singletonMonoidHom : α → Finset α) = singleton :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_singleton_monoid_hom Finset.coe_singletonMonoidHom
#align finset.coe_singleton_add_monoid_hom Finset.coe_singletonAddMonoidHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem singletonMonoidHom_apply (a : α) : singletonMonoidHom a = {a} :=
rfl
#align finset.singleton_monoid_hom_apply Finset.singletonMonoidHom_apply
#align finset.singleton_add_monoid_hom_apply Finset.singletonAddMonoidHom_apply
/-- The coercion from `Finset` to `Set` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "The coercion from `Finset` to `set` as an `AddMonoidHom`."]
noncomputable def coeMonoidHom : Finset α →* Set α where
toFun := CoeTC.coe
map_one' := coe_one
map_mul' := coe_mul
#align finset.coe_monoid_hom Finset.coeMonoidHom
#align finset.coe_add_monoid_hom Finset.coeAddMonoidHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_coeMonoidHom : (coeMonoidHom : Finset α → Set α) = CoeTC.coe :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_coe_monoid_hom Finset.coe_coeMonoidHom
#align finset.coe_coe_add_monoid_hom Finset.coe_coeAddMonoidHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coeMonoidHom_apply (s : Finset α) : coeMonoidHom s = s :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_monoid_hom_apply Finset.coeMonoidHom_apply
#align finset.coe_add_monoid_hom_apply Finset.coeAddMonoidHom_apply
/-- Lift a `MonoidHom` to `Finset` via `image`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "Lift an `add_monoid_hom` to `Finset` via `image`"]
def imageMonoidHom [MulOneClass β] [FunLike F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β] (f : F) :
Finset α →* Finset β :=
{ imageMulHom f, imageOneHom f with }
#align finset.image_monoid_hom Finset.imageMonoidHom
#align finset.image_add_monoid_hom Finset.imageAddMonoidHom
end MulOneClass
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] {s t : Finset α} {a : α} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Pointwise.lean | 975 | 979 | theorem coe_pow (s : Finset α) (n : ℕ) : ↑(s ^ n) = (s : Set α) ^ n := by |
change ↑(npowRec n s) = (s: Set α) ^ n
induction' n with n ih
· rw [npowRec, pow_zero, coe_one]
· rw [npowRec, pow_succ, coe_mul, ih]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Functor.Multivariate
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Multivariate.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Multivariate.M
import Mathlib.Data.QPF.Multivariate.Basic
#align_import data.qpf.multivariate.constructions.cofix from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
/-!
# The final co-algebra of a multivariate qpf is again a qpf.
For a `(n+1)`-ary QPF `F (α₀,..,αₙ)`, we take the least fixed point of `F` with
regards to its last argument `αₙ`. The result is an `n`-ary functor: `Fix F (α₀,..,αₙ₋₁)`.
Making `Fix F` into a functor allows us to take the fixed point, compose with other functors
and take a fixed point again.
## Main definitions
* `Cofix.mk` - constructor
* `Cofix.dest` - destructor
* `Cofix.corec` - corecursor: useful for formulating infinite, productive computations
* `Cofix.bisim` - bisimulation: proof technique to show the equality of possibly infinite values
of `Cofix F α`
## Implementation notes
For `F` a QPF, we define `Cofix F α` in terms of the M-type of the polynomial functor `P` of `F`.
We define the relation `Mcongr` and take its quotient as the definition of `Cofix F α`.
`Mcongr` is taken as the weakest bisimulation on M-type. See
[avigad-carneiro-hudon2019] for more details.
## Reference
* Jeremy Avigad, Mario M. Carneiro and Simon Hudon.
[*Data Types as Quotients of Polynomial Functors*][avigad-carneiro-hudon2019]
-/
universe u
open MvFunctor
namespace MvQPF
open TypeVec MvPFunctor
open MvFunctor (LiftP LiftR)
variable {n : ℕ} {F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type u} [mvf : MvFunctor F] [q : MvQPF F]
/-- `corecF` is used as a basis for defining the corecursor of `Cofix F α`. `corecF`
uses corecursion to construct the M-type generated by `q.P` and uses function on `F`
as a corecursive step -/
def corecF {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 β)) : β → q.P.M α :=
M.corec _ fun x => repr (g x)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mvqpf.corecF MvQPF.corecF
theorem corecF_eq {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 β)) (x : β) :
M.dest q.P (corecF g x) = appendFun id (corecF g) <$$> repr (g x) := by
rw [corecF, M.dest_corec]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mvqpf.corecF_eq MvQPF.corecF_eq
/-- Characterization of desirable equivalence relations on M-types -/
def IsPrecongr {α : TypeVec n} (r : q.P.M α → q.P.M α → Prop) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x y⦄,
r x y →
abs (appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> M.dest q.P x) =
abs (appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> M.dest q.P y)
#align mvqpf.is_precongr MvQPF.IsPrecongr
/-- Equivalence relation on M-types representing a value of type `Cofix F` -/
def Mcongr {α : TypeVec n} (x y : q.P.M α) : Prop :=
∃ r, IsPrecongr r ∧ r x y
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mvqpf.Mcongr MvQPF.Mcongr
/-- Greatest fixed point of functor F. The result is a functor with one fewer parameters
than the input. For `F a b c` a ternary functor, fix F is a binary functor such that
```lean
Cofix F a b = F a b (Cofix F a b)
```
-/
def Cofix (F : TypeVec (n + 1) → Type u) [MvFunctor F] [q : MvQPF F] (α : TypeVec n) :=
Quot (@Mcongr _ F _ q α)
#align mvqpf.cofix MvQPF.Cofix
instance {α : TypeVec n} [Inhabited q.P.A] [∀ i : Fin2 n, Inhabited (α i)] :
Inhabited (Cofix F α) :=
⟨Quot.mk _ default⟩
/-- maps every element of the W type to a canonical representative -/
def mRepr {α : TypeVec n} : q.P.M α → q.P.M α :=
corecF (abs ∘ M.dest q.P)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mvqpf.Mrepr MvQPF.mRepr
/-- the map function for the functor `Cofix F` -/
def Cofix.map {α β : TypeVec n} (g : α ⟹ β) : Cofix F α → Cofix F β :=
Quot.lift (fun x : q.P.M α => Quot.mk Mcongr (g <$$> x))
(by
rintro aa₁ aa₂ ⟨r, pr, ra₁a₂⟩; apply Quot.sound
let r' b₁ b₂ := ∃ a₁ a₂ : q.P.M α, r a₁ a₂ ∧ b₁ = g <$$> a₁ ∧ b₂ = g <$$> a₂
use r'; constructor
· show IsPrecongr r'
rintro b₁ b₂ ⟨a₁, a₂, ra₁a₂, b₁eq, b₂eq⟩
let u : Quot r → Quot r' :=
Quot.lift (fun x : q.P.M α => Quot.mk r' (g <$$> x))
(by
intro a₁ a₂ ra₁a₂
apply Quot.sound
exact ⟨a₁, a₂, ra₁a₂, rfl, rfl⟩)
have hu : (Quot.mk r' ∘ fun x : q.P.M α => g <$$> x) = u ∘ Quot.mk r := by
ext x
rfl
rw [b₁eq, b₂eq, M.dest_map, M.dest_map, ← q.P.comp_map, ← q.P.comp_map]
rw [← appendFun_comp, id_comp, hu, ← comp_id g, appendFun_comp]
rw [q.P.comp_map, q.P.comp_map, abs_map, pr ra₁a₂, ← abs_map]
show r' (g <$$> aa₁) (g <$$> aa₂); exact ⟨aa₁, aa₂, ra₁a₂, rfl, rfl⟩)
#align mvqpf.cofix.map MvQPF.Cofix.map
instance Cofix.mvfunctor : MvFunctor (Cofix F) where map := @Cofix.map _ _ _ _
#align mvqpf.cofix.mvfunctor MvQPF.Cofix.mvfunctor
/-- Corecursor for `Cofix F` -/
def Cofix.corec {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 β)) : β → Cofix F α := fun x =>
Quot.mk _ (corecF g x)
#align mvqpf.cofix.corec MvQPF.Cofix.corec
/-- Destructor for `Cofix F` -/
def Cofix.dest {α : TypeVec n} : Cofix F α → F (α.append1 (Cofix F α)) :=
Quot.lift (fun x => appendFun id (Quot.mk Mcongr) <$$> abs (M.dest q.P x))
(by
rintro x y ⟨r, pr, rxy⟩
dsimp
have : ∀ x y, r x y → Mcongr x y := by
intro x y h
exact ⟨r, pr, h⟩
rw [← Quot.factor_mk_eq _ _ this]
conv =>
lhs
rw [appendFun_comp_id, comp_map, ← abs_map, pr rxy, abs_map, ← comp_map,
← appendFun_comp_id])
#align mvqpf.cofix.dest MvQPF.Cofix.dest
/-- Abstraction function for `cofix F α` -/
def Cofix.abs {α} : q.P.M α → Cofix F α :=
Quot.mk _
#align mvqpf.cofix.abs MvQPF.Cofix.abs
/-- Representation function for `Cofix F α` -/
def Cofix.repr {α} : Cofix F α → q.P.M α :=
M.corec _ <| q.repr ∘ Cofix.dest
#align mvqpf.cofix.repr MvQPF.Cofix.repr
/-- Corecursor for `Cofix F` -/
def Cofix.corec'₁ {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : ∀ {X}, (β → X) → F (α.append1 X)) (x : β) :
Cofix F α :=
Cofix.corec (fun _ => g id) x
#align mvqpf.cofix.corec'₁ MvQPF.Cofix.corec'₁
/-- More flexible corecursor for `Cofix F`. Allows the return of a fully formed
value instead of making a recursive call -/
def Cofix.corec' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 (Cofix F α ⊕ β))) (x : β) :
Cofix F α :=
let f : (α ::: Cofix F α) ⟹ (α ::: (Cofix F α ⊕ β)) := id ::: Sum.inl
Cofix.corec (Sum.elim (MvFunctor.map f ∘ Cofix.dest) g) (Sum.inr x : Cofix F α ⊕ β)
#align mvqpf.cofix.corec' MvQPF.Cofix.corec'
/-- Corecursor for `Cofix F`. The shape allows recursive calls to
look like recursive calls. -/
def Cofix.corec₁ {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u}
(g : ∀ {X}, (Cofix F α → X) → (β → X) → β → F (α ::: X)) (x : β) : Cofix F α :=
Cofix.corec' (fun x => g Sum.inl Sum.inr x) x
#align mvqpf.cofix.corec₁ MvQPF.Cofix.corec₁
theorem Cofix.dest_corec {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 β)) (x : β) :
Cofix.dest (Cofix.corec g x) = appendFun id (Cofix.corec g) <$$> g x := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [Cofix.dest, Cofix.corec];
dsimp
rw [corecF_eq, abs_map, abs_repr, ← comp_map, ← appendFun_comp]; rfl
#align mvqpf.cofix.dest_corec MvQPF.Cofix.dest_corec
/-- constructor for `Cofix F` -/
def Cofix.mk {α : TypeVec n} : F (α.append1 <| Cofix F α) → Cofix F α :=
Cofix.corec fun x => (appendFun id fun i : Cofix F α => Cofix.dest.{u} i) <$$> x
#align mvqpf.cofix.mk MvQPF.Cofix.mk
/-!
## Bisimulation principles for `Cofix F`
The following theorems are bisimulation principles. The general idea
is to use a bisimulation relation to prove the equality between
specific values of type `Cofix F α`.
A bisimulation relation `R` for values `x y : Cofix F α`:
* holds for `x y`: `R x y`
* for any values `x y` that satisfy `R`, their root has the same shape
and their children can be paired in such a way that they satisfy `R`.
-/
private theorem Cofix.bisim_aux {α : TypeVec n} (r : Cofix F α → Cofix F α → Prop) (h' : ∀ x, r x x)
(h : ∀ x y, r x y →
appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> Cofix.dest x = appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> Cofix.dest y) :
∀ x y, r x y → x = y := by
intro x
rcases x; clear x; rename M (P F) α => x;
intro y
rcases y; clear y; rename M (P F) α => y;
intro rxy
apply Quot.sound
let r' := fun x y => r (Quot.mk _ x) (Quot.mk _ y)
have hr' : r' = fun x y => r (Quot.mk _ x) (Quot.mk _ y) := rfl
have : IsPrecongr r' := by
intro a b r'ab
have h₀ :
appendFun id (Quot.mk r ∘ Quot.mk Mcongr) <$$> MvQPF.abs (M.dest q.P a) =
appendFun id (Quot.mk r ∘ Quot.mk Mcongr) <$$> MvQPF.abs (M.dest q.P b) := by
rw [appendFun_comp_id, comp_map, comp_map]; exact h _ _ r'ab
have h₁ : ∀ u v : q.P.M α, Mcongr u v → Quot.mk r' u = Quot.mk r' v := by
intro u v cuv
apply Quot.sound
dsimp [r', hr']
rw [Quot.sound cuv]
apply h'
let f : Quot r → Quot r' :=
Quot.lift (Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁)
(by
intro c
apply Quot.inductionOn
(motive := fun c =>
∀b, r c b → Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁ c = Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁ b) c
clear c
intro c d
apply Quot.inductionOn
(motive := fun d => r (Quot.mk Mcongr c) d →
Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁ (Quot.mk Mcongr c) = Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁ d) d
clear d
intro d rcd; apply Quot.sound; apply rcd)
have : f ∘ Quot.mk r ∘ Quot.mk Mcongr = Quot.mk r' := rfl
rw [← this, appendFun_comp_id, q.P.comp_map, q.P.comp_map, abs_map, abs_map, abs_map, abs_map,
h₀]
exact ⟨r', this, rxy⟩
/-- Bisimulation principle using `map` and `Quot.mk` to match and relate children of two trees. -/
theorem Cofix.bisim_rel {α : TypeVec n} (r : Cofix F α → Cofix F α → Prop)
(h : ∀ x y, r x y →
appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> Cofix.dest x = appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> Cofix.dest y) :
∀ x y, r x y → x = y := by
let r' (x y) := x = y ∨ r x y
intro x y rxy
apply Cofix.bisim_aux r'
· intro x
left
rfl
· intro x y r'xy
cases r'xy with
| inl h =>
rw [h]
| inr r'xy =>
have : ∀ x y, r x y → r' x y := fun x y h => Or.inr h
rw [← Quot.factor_mk_eq _ _ this]
dsimp [r']
rw [appendFun_comp_id]
rw [@comp_map _ _ _ q _ _ _ (appendFun id (Quot.mk r)),
@comp_map _ _ _ q _ _ _ (appendFun id (Quot.mk r))]
rw [h _ _ r'xy]
right; exact rxy
#align mvqpf.cofix.bisim_rel MvQPF.Cofix.bisim_rel
/-- Bisimulation principle using `LiftR` to match and relate children of two trees. -/
theorem Cofix.bisim {α : TypeVec n} (r : Cofix F α → Cofix F α → Prop)
(h : ∀ x y, r x y → LiftR (RelLast α r (i := _)) (Cofix.dest x) (Cofix.dest y)) :
∀ x y, r x y → x = y := by
apply Cofix.bisim_rel
intro x y rxy
rcases (liftR_iff (fun a b => RelLast α r a b) (dest x) (dest y)).mp (h x y rxy)
with ⟨a, f₀, f₁, dxeq, dyeq, h'⟩
rw [dxeq, dyeq, ← abs_map, ← abs_map, MvPFunctor.map_eq, MvPFunctor.map_eq]
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun f₀, ← split_dropFun_lastFun f₁]
rw [appendFun_comp_splitFun, appendFun_comp_splitFun]
rw [id_comp, id_comp]
congr 2 with (i j); cases' i with _ i
· apply Quot.sound
apply h' _ j
· change f₀ _ j = f₁ _ j
apply h' _ j
#align mvqpf.cofix.bisim MvQPF.Cofix.bisim
open MvFunctor
/-- Bisimulation principle using `LiftR'` to match and relate children of two trees. -/
theorem Cofix.bisim₂ {α : TypeVec n} (r : Cofix F α → Cofix F α → Prop)
(h : ∀ x y, r x y → LiftR' (RelLast' α r) (Cofix.dest x) (Cofix.dest y)) :
∀ x y, r x y → x = y :=
Cofix.bisim r <| by intros; rw [← LiftR_RelLast_iff]; apply h; assumption
#align mvqpf.cofix.bisim₂ MvQPF.Cofix.bisim₂
/-- Bisimulation principle the values `⟨a,f⟩` of the polynomial functor representing
`Cofix F α` as well as an invariant `Q : β → Prop` and a state `β` generating the
left-hand side and right-hand side of the equality through functions `u v : β → Cofix F α` -/
theorem Cofix.bisim' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} (Q : β → Prop) (u v : β → Cofix F α)
(h : ∀ x, Q x → ∃ a f' f₀ f₁,
Cofix.dest (u x) = q.abs ⟨a, q.P.appendContents f' f₀⟩ ∧
Cofix.dest (v x) = q.abs ⟨a, q.P.appendContents f' f₁⟩ ∧
∀ i, ∃ x', Q x' ∧ f₀ i = u x' ∧ f₁ i = v x') :
∀ x, Q x → u x = v x := fun x Qx =>
let R := fun w z : Cofix F α => ∃ x', Q x' ∧ w = u x' ∧ z = v x'
Cofix.bisim R
(fun x y ⟨x', Qx', xeq, yeq⟩ => by
rcases h x' Qx' with ⟨a, f', f₀, f₁, ux'eq, vx'eq, h'⟩
rw [liftR_iff]
refine
⟨a, q.P.appendContents f' f₀, q.P.appendContents f' f₁, xeq.symm ▸ ux'eq,
yeq.symm ▸ vx'eq, ?_⟩
intro i; cases i
· apply h'
· intro j
apply Eq.refl)
_ _ ⟨x, Qx, rfl, rfl⟩
#align mvqpf.cofix.bisim' MvQPF.Cofix.bisim'
theorem Cofix.mk_dest {α : TypeVec n} (x : Cofix F α) : Cofix.mk (Cofix.dest x) = x := by
apply Cofix.bisim_rel (fun x y : Cofix F α => x = Cofix.mk (Cofix.dest y)) _ _ _ rfl;
dsimp
intro x y h
rw [h]
conv =>
lhs
congr
rfl
rw [Cofix.mk]
rw [Cofix.dest_corec]
rw [← comp_map, ← appendFun_comp, id_comp]
rw [← comp_map, ← appendFun_comp, id_comp, ← Cofix.mk]
congr
apply congrArg
funext x
apply Quot.sound;
rfl
#align mvqpf.cofix.mk_dest MvQPF.Cofix.mk_dest
theorem Cofix.dest_mk {α : TypeVec n} (x : F (α.append1 <| Cofix F α)) :
Cofix.dest (Cofix.mk x) = x := by
have : Cofix.mk ∘ Cofix.dest = @_root_.id (Cofix F α) := funext Cofix.mk_dest
rw [Cofix.mk, Cofix.dest_corec, ← comp_map, ← Cofix.mk, ← appendFun_comp, this, id_comp,
appendFun_id_id, MvFunctor.id_map]
#align mvqpf.cofix.dest_mk MvQPF.Cofix.dest_mk
theorem Cofix.ext {α : TypeVec n} (x y : Cofix F α) (h : x.dest = y.dest) : x = y := by
rw [← Cofix.mk_dest x, h, Cofix.mk_dest]
#align mvqpf.cofix.ext MvQPF.Cofix.ext
| Mathlib/Data/QPF/Multivariate/Constructions/Cofix.lean | 366 | 367 | theorem Cofix.ext_mk {α : TypeVec n} (x y : F (α ::: Cofix F α)) (h : Cofix.mk x = Cofix.mk y) :
x = y := by | rw [← Cofix.dest_mk x, h, Cofix.dest_mk]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.DenselyOrdered
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
#align uniform_space_of_dist UniformSpace.ofDist
-- Porting note: dropped the `dist_self` argument
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun x hx y => hx.elim⟩ (fun s ⟨c, hc⟩ t h => ⟨c, fun x hx y hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
#align bornology.of_dist Bornology.ofDistₓ
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
dist : α → α → ℝ
#align has_dist Dist
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
#noalign pseudo_metric_space.edist_dist_tac -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: restore
/-- Pseudo metric and Metric spaces
A pseudo metric space is endowed with a distance for which the requirement `d(x,y)=0 → x = y` might
not hold. A metric space is a pseudo metric space such that `d(x,y)=0 → x = y`.
Each pseudo metric space induces a canonical `UniformSpace` and hence a canonical
`TopologicalSpace` This is enforced in the type class definition, by extending the `UniformSpace`
structure. When instantiating a `PseudoMetricSpace` structure, the uniformity fields are not
necessary, they will be filled in by default. In the same way, each (pseudo) metric space induces a
(pseudo) emetric space structure. It is included in the structure, but filled in by default.
-/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) extends Dist α : Type u where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y)
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add := by _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space PseudoMetricSpace
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
cases' m with d _ _ _ ed hed U hU B hB
cases' m' with d' _ _ _ ed' hed' U' hU' B' hB'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
#align pseudo_metric_space.ext PseudoMetricSpace.ext
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_has_edist PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
edist_dist := fun x y => by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
#align pseudo_metric_space.of_dist_topology PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
#align dist_self dist_self
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
#align dist_comm dist_comm
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
#align edist_dist edist_dist
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
#align dist_triangle dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
#align dist_triangle_left dist_triangle_left
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
#align dist_triangle_right dist_triangle_right
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
#align dist_triangle4 dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
#align dist_triangle4_left dist_triangle4_left
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
#align dist_triangle4_right dist_triangle4_right
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem dist_le_Ico_sum_dist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
dist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, dist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, dist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
dist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ dist (f m) (f n) + dist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
#align dist_le_Ico_sum_dist dist_le_Ico_sum_dist
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem dist_le_range_sum_dist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, dist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ dist_le_Ico_sum_dist f (Nat.zero_le n)
#align dist_le_range_sum_dist dist_le_range_sum_dist
/-- A version of `dist_le_Ico_sum_dist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → dist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
dist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (dist_le_Ico_sum_dist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
#align dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le
/-- A version of `dist_le_range_sum_dist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → dist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
dist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
#align dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
#align swap_dist swap_dist
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
#align abs_dist_sub_le abs_dist_sub_le
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
#align dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
#align abs_dist abs_dist
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
#align has_nndist NNDist
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_has_nndist PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist`-/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
#align dist_nndist dist_nndist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
#align coe_nndist coe_nndist
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist`-/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
#align edist_nndist edist_nndist
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist`-/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
#align nndist_edist nndist_edist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
#align coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
#align edist_lt_coe edist_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
#align edist_le_coe edist_le_coe
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite-/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
#align edist_lt_top edist_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite-/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
#align edist_ne_top edist_ne_top
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes-/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
#align nndist_self nndist_self
-- Porting note: `dist_nndist` and `coe_nndist` moved up
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
#align dist_lt_coe dist_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
#align dist_le_coe dist_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
#align edist_lt_of_real edist_lt_ofReal
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
#align edist_le_of_real edist_le_ofReal
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist`-/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
#align nndist_dist nndist_dist
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
#align nndist_comm nndist_comm
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance-/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle nndist_triangle
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle_left nndist_triangle_left
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
#align nndist_triangle_right nndist_triangle_right
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist`-/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
#align dist_edist dist_edist
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
#align metric.ball Metric.ball
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_ball Metric.mem_ball
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
#align metric.mem_ball' Metric.mem_ball'
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
#align metric.pos_of_mem_ball Metric.pos_of_mem_ball
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
#align metric.mem_ball_self Metric.mem_ball_self
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
#align metric.nonempty_ball Metric.nonempty_ball
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
#align metric.ball_eq_empty Metric.ball_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
#align metric.ball_zero Metric.ball_zero
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align metric.exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball Metric.exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
#align metric.ball_eq_ball Metric.ball_eq_ball
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PseudoMetric.lean | 450 | 453 | theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by |
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.ModuleCat
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.Invariants
/-!
# The low-degree cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation
Let `k` be a commutative ring and `G` a group. This file gives simple expressions for
the group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A` in degrees 0, 1 and 2.
In `RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, we define the `n`th group cohomology of `A` to be
the cohomology of a complex `inhomogeneousCochains A`, whose objects are `(Fin n → G) → A`; this is
unnecessarily unwieldy in low degree. Moreover, cohomology of a complex is defined as an abstract
cokernel, whereas the definitions here are explicit quotients of cocycles by coboundaries.
We also show that when the representation on `A` is trivial, `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)`.
Given an additive or multiplicative abelian group `A` with an appropriate scalar action of `G`,
we provide support for turning a function `f : G → A` satisfying the 1-cocycle identity into an
element of the `oneCocycles` of the representation on `A` (or `Additive A`) corresponding to the
scalar action. We also do this for 1-coboundaries, 2-cocycles and 2-coboundaries. The
multiplicative case, starting with the section `IsMulCocycle`, just mirrors the additive case;
unfortunately `@[to_additive]` can't deal with scalar actions.
The file also contains an identification between the definitions in
`RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, `groupCohomology.cocycles A n` and
`groupCohomology A n`, and the `nCocycles` and `Hn A` in this file, for `n = 0, 1, 2`.
## Main definitions
* `groupCohomology.H0 A`: the invariants `Aᴳ` of the `G`-representation on `A`.
* `groupCohomology.H1 A`: 1-cocycles (i.e. `Z¹(G, A) := Ker(d¹ : Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A)`) modulo
1-coboundaries (i.e. `B¹(G, A) := Im(d⁰: A → Fun(G, A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H2 A`: 2-cocycles (i.e. `Z²(G, A) := Ker(d² : Fun(G², A) → Fun(G³, A)`) modulo
2-coboundaries (i.e. `B²(G, A) := Im(d¹: Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H1LequivOfIsTrivial`: the isomorphism `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)` when the
representation on `A` is trivial.
* `groupCohomology.isoHn` for `n = 0, 1, 2`: an isomorphism
`groupCohomology A n ≅ groupCohomology.Hn A`.
## TODO
* The relationship between `H2` and group extensions
* The inflation-restriction exact sequence
* Nonabelian group cohomology
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Representation
variable {k G : Type u} [CommRing k] [Group G] (A : Rep k G)
namespace groupCohomology
section Cochains
/-- The 0th object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `A` as a `k`-module. -/
def zeroCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 0 ≃ₗ[k] A :=
LinearEquiv.funUnique (Fin 0 → G) k A
/-- The 1st object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def oneCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 1 ≃ₗ[k] G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A (Equiv.funUnique (Fin 1) G).symm
/-- The 2nd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G², A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def twoCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 2 ≃ₗ[k] G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G).symm
/-- The 3rd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G³, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def threeCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 3 ≃ₗ[k] G × G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| ((Equiv.piFinSucc 2 G).trans
((Equiv.refl G).prodCongr (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G))).symm
end Cochains
section Differentials
/-- The 0th differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `A → Fun(G, A)`. It sends `(a, g) ↦ ρ_A(g)(a) - a.` -/
@[simps]
def dZero : A →ₗ[k] G → A where
toFun m g := A.ρ g m - m
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by simp only [map_add, add_sub_add_comm]; rfl
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_sub]
theorem dZero_ker_eq_invariants : LinearMap.ker (dZero A) = invariants A.ρ := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.mem_ker, mem_invariants, ← @sub_eq_zero _ _ _ x, Function.funext_iff]
rfl
@[simp] theorem dZero_eq_zero [A.IsTrivial] : dZero A = 0 := by
ext
simp only [dZero_apply, apply_eq_self, sub_self, LinearMap.zero_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
/-- The 1st differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
@[simps]
def dOne : (G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G → A where
toFun f g := A.ρ g.1 (f g.2) - f (g.1 * g.2) + f g.1
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_add, add_add_add_comm, add_sub_add_comm]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- The 2nd differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G × G, A) → Fun(G × G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂, g₃)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂, g₃)) - f(g₁g₂, g₃) + f(g₁, g₂g₃) - f(g₁, g₂).` -/
@[simps]
def dTwo : (G × G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G × G → A where
toFun f g :=
A.ρ g.1 (f (g.2.1, g.2.2)) - f (g.1 * g.2.1, g.2.2) + f (g.1, g.2.1 * g.2.2) - f (g.1, g.2.1)
map_add' x y :=
funext fun g => by
dsimp
rw [map_add, add_sub_add_comm (A.ρ _ _), add_sub_assoc, add_sub_add_comm, add_add_add_comm,
add_sub_assoc, add_sub_assoc]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; simp only [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dZero` gives a simpler expression for the 0th differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C⁰(G, A) ---d⁰---> C¹(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
A ---- dZero ---> Fun(G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `zeroCochainsLequiv` and `oneCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dZero_comp_eq : dZero A ∘ₗ (zeroCochainsLequiv A) =
oneCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ (inhomogeneousCochains A).d 0 1 := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y (x default) - x default = _ + ({0} : Finset _).sum _
simp_rw [Fin.coe_fin_one, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul,
Finset.sum_singleton, sub_eq_add_neg]
rcongr i <;> exact Fin.elim0 i
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dOne` gives a simpler expression for the 1st differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C¹(G, A) ---d¹-----> C²(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G, A) -dOne-> Fun(G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `oneCochainsLequiv` and `twoCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dOne_comp_eq : dOne A ∘ₗ oneCochainsLequiv A =
twoCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ (inhomogeneousCochains A).d 1 2 := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ = _ + _
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two]
simp only [Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul, Fin.val_one,
Nat.one_add, neg_one_sq, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
rcongr i <;> rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0] <;> rfl
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dTwo` gives a simpler expression for the 2nd differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C²(G, A) -------d²-----> C³(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G × G, A) --dTwo--> Fun(G × G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `twoCochainsLequiv` and `threeCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dTwo_comp_eq :
dTwo A ∘ₗ twoCochainsLequiv A = threeCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ (inhomogeneousCochains A).d 2 3 := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ - x _ = _ + _
dsimp
rw [Fin.sum_univ_three]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul,
one_smul, Fin.val_one, Fin.val_two, pow_succ' (-1 : k) 2, neg_sq, Nat.one_add, one_pow, mul_one]
rcongr i <;> fin_cases i <;> rfl
theorem dOne_comp_dZero : dOne A ∘ₗ dZero A = 0 := by
ext x g
simp only [LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, dOne_apply A, dZero_apply A, map_sub,
map_mul, LinearMap.mul_apply, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left, sub_add_sub_cancel, sub_self]
rfl
theorem dTwo_comp_dOne : dTwo A ∘ₗ dOne A = 0 := by
show ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne A) ≫ ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo A) = _
have h1 : _ ≫ ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne A) = _ ≫ _ := congr_arg ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne_comp_eq A)
have h2 : _ ≫ ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo A) = _ ≫ _ := congr_arg ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo_comp_eq A)
simp only [← LinearEquiv.toModuleIso_hom] at h1 h2
simp only [(Iso.eq_inv_comp _).2 h2, (Iso.eq_inv_comp _).2 h1,
Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp, comp_zero]
end Differentials
section Cocycles
/-- The 1-cocycles `Z¹(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the kernel of the map
`Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)` sending `(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
def oneCocycles : Submodule k (G → A) := LinearMap.ker (dOne A)
/-- The 2-cocycles `Z²(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the kernel of the map
`Fun(G × G, A) → Fun(G × G × G, A)` sending
`(f, (g₁, g₂, g₃)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂, g₃)) - f(g₁g₂, g₃) + f(g₁, g₂g₃) - f(g₁, g₂).` -/
def twoCocycles : Submodule k (G × G → A) := LinearMap.ker (dTwo A)
variable {A}
theorem mem_oneCocycles_def (f : G → A) :
f ∈ oneCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h : G, A.ρ g (f h) - f (g * h) + f g = 0 :=
LinearMap.mem_ker.trans <| by
rw [Function.funext_iff]
simp only [dOne_apply, Pi.zero_apply, Prod.forall]
theorem mem_oneCocycles_iff (f : G → A) :
f ∈ oneCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h : G, f (g * h) = A.ρ g (f h) + f g := by
simp_rw [mem_oneCocycles_def, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
@[simp] theorem oneCocycles_map_one (f : oneCocycles A) : f.1 1 = 0 := by
have := (mem_oneCocycles_def f.1).1 f.2 1 1
simpa only [map_one, LinearMap.one_apply, mul_one, sub_self, zero_add] using this
@[simp] theorem oneCocycles_map_inv (f : oneCocycles A) (g : G) :
A.ρ g (f.1 g⁻¹) = - f.1 g := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← oneCocycles_map_one f, ← mul_inv_self g,
(mem_oneCocycles_iff f.1).1 f.2 g g⁻¹]
theorem oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial [A.IsTrivial] (f : oneCocycles A) (g h : G) :
f.1 (g * h) = f.1 g + f.1 h := by
rw [(mem_oneCocycles_iff f.1).1 f.2, apply_eq_self A.ρ g (f.1 h), add_comm]
theorem mem_oneCocycles_of_addMonoidHom [A.IsTrivial] (f : Additive G →+ A) :
f ∘ Additive.ofMul ∈ oneCocycles A :=
(mem_oneCocycles_iff _).2 fun g h => by
simp only [Function.comp_apply, ofMul_mul, map_add,
oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial, apply_eq_self A.ρ g (f (Additive.ofMul h)),
add_comm (f (Additive.ofMul g))]
variable (A)
/-- When `A : Rep k G` is a trivial representation of `G`, `Z¹(G, A)` is isomorphic to the
group homs `G → A`. -/
@[simps] def oneCocyclesLequivOfIsTrivial [hA : A.IsTrivial] :
oneCocycles A ≃ₗ[k] Additive G →+ A where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f.1 ∘ Additive.toMul
map_zero' := oneCocycles_map_one f
map_add' := oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial f }
map_add' x y := rfl
map_smul' r x := rfl
invFun f :=
{ val := f
property := mem_oneCocycles_of_addMonoidHom f }
left_inv f := by ext; rfl
right_inv f := by ext; rfl
variable {A}
theorem mem_twoCocycles_def (f : G × G → A) :
f ∈ twoCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h j : G,
A.ρ g (f (h, j)) - f (g * h, j) + f (g, h * j) - f (g, h) = 0 :=
LinearMap.mem_ker.trans <| by
rw [Function.funext_iff]
simp only [dTwo_apply, Prod.mk.eta, Pi.zero_apply, Prod.forall]
theorem mem_twoCocycles_iff (f : G × G → A) :
f ∈ twoCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h j : G,
f (g * h, j) + f (g, h) =
A.ρ g (f (h, j)) + f (g, h * j) := by
simp_rw [mem_twoCocycles_def, sub_eq_zero, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, eq_comm,
add_comm (f (_ * _, _))]
theorem twoCocycles_map_one_fst (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
f.1 (1, g) = f.1 (1, 1) := by
have := ((mem_twoCocycles_iff f.1).1 f.2 1 1 g).symm
simpa only [map_one, LinearMap.one_apply, one_mul, add_right_inj, this]
theorem twoCocycles_map_one_snd (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
f.1 (g, 1) = A.ρ g (f.1 (1, 1)) := by
have := (mem_twoCocycles_iff f.1).1 f.2 g 1 1
simpa only [mul_one, add_left_inj, this]
lemma twoCocycles_ρ_map_inv_sub_map_inv (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
A.ρ g (f.1 (g⁻¹, g)) - f.1 (g, g⁻¹)
= f.1 (1, 1) - f.1 (g, 1) := by
have := (mem_twoCocycles_iff f.1).1 f.2 g g⁻¹ g
simp only [mul_right_inv, mul_left_inv, twoCocycles_map_one_fst _ g]
at this
exact sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add.2 this.symm
end Cocycles
section Coboundaries
/-- The 1-coboundaries `B¹(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the image of the map
`A → Fun(G, A)` sending `(a, g) ↦ ρ_A(g)(a) - a.` -/
def oneCoboundaries : Submodule k (oneCocycles A) :=
LinearMap.range ((dZero A).codRestrict (oneCocycles A) fun c =>
LinearMap.ext_iff.1 (dOne_comp_dZero A) c)
/-- The 2-coboundaries `B²(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the image of the map
`Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)` sending `(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
def twoCoboundaries : Submodule k (twoCocycles A) :=
LinearMap.range ((dOne A).codRestrict (twoCocycles A) fun c =>
LinearMap.ext_iff.1 (dTwo_comp_dOne.{u} A) c)
variable {A}
/-- Makes a 1-coboundary out of `f ∈ Im(d⁰)`. -/
def oneCoboundariesOfMemRange {f : G → A} (h : f ∈ LinearMap.range (dZero A)) :
oneCoboundaries A :=
⟨⟨f, LinearMap.range_le_ker_iff.2 (dOne_comp_dZero A) h⟩,
by rcases h with ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩
theorem oneCoboundaries_of_mem_range_apply {f : G → A} (h : f ∈ LinearMap.range (dZero A)) :
(oneCoboundariesOfMemRange h).1.1 = f := rfl
/-- Makes a 1-coboundary out of `f : G → A` and `x` such that
`ρ(g)(x) - x = f(g)` for all `g : G`. -/
def oneCoboundariesOfEq {f : G → A} {x : A} (hf : ∀ g, A.ρ g x - x = f g) :
oneCoboundaries A :=
oneCoboundariesOfMemRange ⟨x, by ext g; exact hf g⟩
theorem oneCoboundariesOfEq_apply {f : G → A} {x : A} (hf : ∀ g, A.ρ g x - x = f g) :
(oneCoboundariesOfEq hf).1.1 = f := rfl
theorem mem_range_of_mem_oneCoboundaries {f : oneCocycles A} (h : f ∈ oneCoboundaries A) :
f.1 ∈ LinearMap.range (dZero A) := by
rcases h with ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
theorem oneCoboundaries_eq_bot_of_isTrivial (A : Rep k G) [A.IsTrivial] :
oneCoboundaries A = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [oneCoboundaries, dZero_eq_zero]
exact LinearMap.range_eq_bot.2 rfl
/-- Makes a 2-coboundary out of `f ∈ Im(d¹)`. -/
def twoCoboundariesOfMemRange {f : G × G → A} (h : f ∈ LinearMap.range (dOne A)) :
twoCoboundaries A :=
⟨⟨f, LinearMap.range_le_ker_iff.2 (dTwo_comp_dOne A) h⟩,
by rcases h with ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩
theorem twoCoboundariesOfMemRange_apply {f : G × G → A} (h : f ∈ LinearMap.range (dOne A)) :
(twoCoboundariesOfMemRange h).1.1 = f := rfl
/-- Makes a 2-coboundary out of `f : G × G → A` and `x : G → A` such that
`ρ(g)(x(h)) - x(gh) + x(g) = f(g, h)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def twoCoboundariesOfEq {f : G × G → A} {x : G → A}
(hf : ∀ g h, A.ρ g (x h) - x (g * h) + x g = f (g, h)) :
twoCoboundaries A :=
twoCoboundariesOfMemRange ⟨x, by ext g; exact hf g.1 g.2⟩
theorem twoCoboundariesOfEq_apply {f : G × G → A} {x : G → A}
(hf : ∀ g h, A.ρ g (x h) - x (g * h) + x g = f (g, h)) :
(twoCoboundariesOfEq hf).1.1 = f := rfl
theorem mem_range_of_mem_twoCoboundaries {f : twoCocycles A} (h : f ∈ twoCoboundaries A) :
(twoCocycles A).subtype f ∈ LinearMap.range (dOne A) := by
rcases h with ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
end Coboundaries
section IsCocycle
section
variable {G A : Type*} [Mul G] [AddCommGroup A] [SMul G A]
/-- A function `f : G → A` satisfies the 1-cocycle condition if
`f(gh) = g • f(h) + f(g)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsOneCocycle (f : G → A) : Prop := ∀ g h : G, f (g * h) = g • f h + f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → A` satisfies the 2-cocycle condition if
`f(gh, j) + f(g, h) = g • f(h, j) + f(g, hj)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsTwoCocycle (f : G × G → A) : Prop :=
∀ g h j : G, f (g * h, j) + f (g, h) = g • (f (h, j)) + f (g, h * j)
end
section
variable {G A : Type*} [Monoid G] [AddCommGroup A] [MulAction G A]
theorem map_one_of_isOneCocycle {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCocycle f) :
f 1 = 0 := by
simpa only [mul_one, one_smul, self_eq_add_right] using hf 1 1
theorem map_one_fst_of_isTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (1, g) = f (1, 1) := by
simpa only [one_smul, one_mul, mul_one, add_right_inj] using (hf 1 1 g).symm
theorem map_one_snd_of_isTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (g, 1) = g • f (1, 1) := by
simpa only [mul_one, add_left_inj] using hf g 1 1
end
section
variable {G A : Type*} [Group G] [AddCommGroup A] [MulAction G A]
@[simp] theorem map_inv_of_isOneCocycle {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCocycle f) (g : G) :
g • f g⁻¹ = - f g := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← map_one_of_isOneCocycle hf, ← mul_inv_self g, hf g g⁻¹]
theorem smul_map_inv_sub_map_inv_of_isTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
g • f (g⁻¹, g) - f (g, g⁻¹) = f (1, 1) - f (g, 1) := by
have := hf g g⁻¹ g
simp only [mul_right_inv, mul_left_inv, map_one_fst_of_isTwoCocycle hf g] at this
exact sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add.2 this.symm
end
end IsCocycle
section IsCoboundary
variable {G A : Type*} [Mul G] [AddCommGroup A] [SMul G A]
/-- A function `f : G → A` satisfies the 1-coboundary condition if there's `x : A` such that
`g • x - x = f(g)` for all `g : G`. -/
def IsOneCoboundary (f : G → A) : Prop := ∃ x : A, ∀ g : G, g • x - x = f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → A` satisfies the 2-coboundary condition if there's `x : G → A` such
that `g • x(h) - x(gh) + x(g) = f(g, h)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsTwoCoboundary (f : G × G → A) : Prop :=
∃ x : G → A, ∀ g h : G, g • x h - x (g * h) + x g = f (g, h)
end IsCoboundary
section ofDistribMulAction
variable {k G A : Type u} [CommRing k] [Group G] [AddCommGroup A] [Module k A]
[DistribMulAction G A] [SMulCommClass G k A]
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G → A` satisfying the 1-cocycle condition, produces a 1-cocycle for the representation on
`A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
def oneCocyclesOfIsOneCocycle {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCocycle f) :
oneCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
⟨f, (mem_oneCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) f).2 hf⟩
theorem isOneCocycle_of_oneCocycles (f : oneCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsOneCocycle (A := A) f.1 := (mem_oneCocycles_iff f.1).1 f.2
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G → A` satisfying the 1-coboundary condition, produces a 1-coboundary for the representation
on `A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
def oneCoboundariesOfIsOneCoboundary {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCoboundary f) :
oneCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
oneCoboundariesOfMemRange (by rcases hf with ⟨x, hx⟩; exact ⟨x, by ext g; exact hx g⟩)
theorem isOneCoboundary_of_oneCoboundaries (f : oneCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsOneCoboundary (A := A) f.1.1 := by
rcases mem_range_of_mem_oneCoboundaries f.2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, by rw [← hx]; intro g; rfl⟩
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G × G → A` satisfying the 2-cocycle condition, produces a 2-cocycle for the representation on
`A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
def twoCocyclesOfIsTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) :
twoCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
⟨f, (mem_twoCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) f).2 hf⟩
theorem isTwoCocycle_of_twoCocycles (f : twoCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsTwoCocycle (A := A) f.1 := (mem_twoCocycles_iff f.1).1 f.2
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G × G → A` satisfying the 2-coboundary condition, produces a 2-coboundary for the
representation on `A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
def twoCoboundariesOfIsTwoCoboundary {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCoboundary f) :
twoCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
twoCoboundariesOfMemRange (by rcases hf with ⟨x, hx⟩; exact ⟨x, by ext g; exact hx g.1 g.2⟩)
theorem isTwoCoboundary_of_twoCoboundaries (f : twoCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsTwoCoboundary (A := A) f.1.1 := by
rcases mem_range_of_mem_twoCoboundaries f.2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, fun g h => Function.funext_iff.1 hx (g, h)⟩
end ofDistribMulAction
/-! The next few sections, until the section `Cohomology`, are a multiplicative copy of the
previous few sections beginning with `IsCocycle`. Unfortunately `@[to_additive]` doesn't work with
scalar actions. -/
section IsMulCocycle
section
variable {G M : Type*} [Mul G] [CommGroup M] [SMul G M]
/-- A function `f : G → M` satisfies the multiplicative 1-cocycle condition if
`f(gh) = g • f(h) * f(g)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsMulOneCocycle (f : G → M) : Prop := ∀ g h : G, f (g * h) = g • f h * f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → M` satisfies the multiplicative 2-cocycle condition if
`f(gh, j) * f(g, h) = g • f(h, j) * f(g, hj)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsMulTwoCocycle (f : G × G → M) : Prop :=
∀ g h j : G, f (g * h, j) * f (g, h) = g • (f (h, j)) * f (g, h * j)
end
section
variable {G M : Type*} [Monoid G] [CommGroup M] [MulAction G M]
theorem map_one_of_isMulOneCocycle {f : G → M} (hf : IsMulOneCocycle f) :
f 1 = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one, one_smul, self_eq_mul_right] using hf 1 1
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/GroupCohomology/LowDegree.lean | 528 | 530 | theorem map_one_fst_of_isMulTwoCocycle {f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (1, g) = f (1, 1) := by |
simpa only [one_smul, one_mul, mul_one, mul_right_inj] using (hf 1 1 g).symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.KernelPair
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.CommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Over
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.diagonal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f6bab67886fb92c3e2f539cc90a83815f69a189d"
/-!
# The diagonal object of a morphism.
We provide various API and isomorphisms considering the diagonal object `Δ_{Y/X} := pullback f f`
of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`.
-/
open CategoryTheory
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] {X Y Z : C}
namespace pullback
section Diagonal
variable (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasPullback f f]
/-- The diagonal object of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` is `Δ_{X/Y} := pullback f f`. -/
abbrev diagonalObj : C :=
pullback f f
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.diagonal_obj CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.diagonalObj
/-- The diagonal morphism `X ⟶ Δ_{X/Y}` for a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
def diagonal : X ⟶ diagonalObj f :=
pullback.lift (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.diagonal CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.diagonal
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem diagonal_fst : diagonal f ≫ pullback.fst = 𝟙 _ :=
pullback.lift_fst _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.diagonal_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.diagonal_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem diagonal_snd : diagonal f ≫ pullback.snd = 𝟙 _ :=
pullback.lift_snd _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.diagonal_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.diagonal_snd
instance : IsSplitMono (diagonal f) :=
⟨⟨⟨pullback.fst, diagonal_fst f⟩⟩⟩
instance : IsSplitEpi (pullback.fst : pullback f f ⟶ X) :=
⟨⟨⟨diagonal f, diagonal_fst f⟩⟩⟩
instance : IsSplitEpi (pullback.snd : pullback f f ⟶ X) :=
⟨⟨⟨diagonal f, diagonal_snd f⟩⟩⟩
instance [Mono f] : IsIso (diagonal f) := by
rw [(IsIso.inv_eq_of_inv_hom_id (diagonal_fst f)).symm]
infer_instance
/-- The two projections `Δ_{X/Y} ⟶ X` form a kernel pair for `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
theorem diagonal_isKernelPair : IsKernelPair f (pullback.fst : diagonalObj f ⟶ _) pullback.snd :=
IsPullback.of_hasPullback f f
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.diagonal_is_kernel_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.diagonal_isKernelPair
end Diagonal
end pullback
variable [HasPullbacks C]
open pullback
section
variable {U V₁ V₂ : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (i : U ⟶ Y)
variable (i₁ : V₁ ⟶ pullback f i) (i₂ : V₂ ⟶ pullback f i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullback_diagonal_map_snd_fst_fst :
(pullback.snd :
pullback (diagonal f)
(map (i₁ ≫ snd) (i₂ ≫ snd) f f (i₁ ≫ fst) (i₂ ≫ fst) i (by simp [condition])
(by simp [condition])) ⟶
_) ≫
fst ≫ i₁ ≫ fst =
pullback.fst := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Category.comp_id pullback.fst]
rw [← diagonal_fst f, pullback.condition_assoc, pullback.lift_fst]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_snd_fst_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback_diagonal_map_snd_fst_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullback_diagonal_map_snd_snd_fst :
(pullback.snd :
pullback (diagonal f)
(map (i₁ ≫ snd) (i₂ ≫ snd) f f (i₁ ≫ fst) (i₂ ≫ fst) i (by simp [condition])
(by simp [condition])) ⟶
_) ≫
snd ≫ i₂ ≫ fst =
pullback.fst := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Category.comp_id pullback.fst]
rw [← diagonal_snd f, pullback.condition_assoc, pullback.lift_snd]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_snd_snd_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback_diagonal_map_snd_snd_fst
variable [HasPullback i₁ i₂]
set_option maxHeartbeats 400000 in
/-- This iso witnesses the fact that
given `f : X ⟶ Y`, `i : U ⟶ Y`, and `i₁ : V₁ ⟶ X ×[Y] U`, `i₂ : V₂ ⟶ X ×[Y] U`, the diagram
V₁ ×[X ×[Y] U] V₂ ⟶ V₁ ×[U] V₂
| |
| |
↓ ↓
X ⟶ X ×[Y] X
is a pullback square.
Also see `pullback_fst_map_snd_isPullback`.
-/
def pullbackDiagonalMapIso :
pullback (diagonal f)
(map (i₁ ≫ snd) (i₂ ≫ snd) f f (i₁ ≫ fst) (i₂ ≫ fst) i
(by simp only [Category.assoc, condition])
(by simp only [Category.assoc, condition])) ≅
pullback i₁ i₂ where
hom :=
pullback.lift (pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst) (pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd) (by
ext
· simp [Category.assoc, pullback_diagonal_map_snd_fst_fst, pullback_diagonal_map_snd_snd_fst]
· simp [Category.assoc, pullback.condition, pullback.condition_assoc])
inv :=
pullback.lift (pullback.fst ≫ i₁ ≫ pullback.fst)
(pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) pullback.snd (Category.id_comp _).symm
(Category.id_comp _).symm) (by
ext
· simp only [Category.assoc, diagonal_fst, Category.comp_id, limit.lift_π,
PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app, limit.lift_π_assoc, cospan_left]
· simp only [condition_assoc, Category.assoc, diagonal_snd, Category.comp_id,
limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app,
limit.lift_π_assoc, cospan_right])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIso_hom_fst :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIso f i i₁ i₂).hom ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst := by
delta pullbackDiagonalMapIso
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_iso_hom_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIso_hom_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIso_hom_snd :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIso f i i₁ i₂).hom ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd := by
delta pullbackDiagonalMapIso
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_iso_hom_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIso_hom_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIso_inv_fst :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIso f i i₁ i₂).inv ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst ≫ i₁ ≫ pullback.fst := by
delta pullbackDiagonalMapIso
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_iso_inv_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIso_inv_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIso_inv_snd_fst :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIso f i i₁ i₂).inv ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst := by
delta pullbackDiagonalMapIso
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_iso_inv_snd_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIso_inv_snd_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIso_inv_snd_snd :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIso f i i₁ i₂).inv ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.snd := by
delta pullbackDiagonalMapIso
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_iso_inv_snd_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIso_inv_snd_snd
theorem pullback_fst_map_snd_isPullback :
IsPullback (fst ≫ i₁ ≫ fst)
(map i₁ i₂ (i₁ ≫ snd) (i₂ ≫ snd) _ _ _ (Category.id_comp _).symm (Category.id_comp _).symm)
(diagonal f)
(map (i₁ ≫ snd) (i₂ ≫ snd) f f (i₁ ≫ fst) (i₂ ≫ fst) i (by simp [condition])
(by simp [condition])) :=
IsPullback.of_iso_pullback ⟨by ext <;> simp [condition_assoc]⟩
(pullbackDiagonalMapIso f i i₁ i₂).symm (pullbackDiagonalMapIso_inv_fst f i i₁ i₂)
(by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_fst_map_snd_is_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback_fst_map_snd_isPullback
end
section
variable {S T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T) (i : T ⟶ S)
variable [HasPullback i i] [HasPullback f g] [HasPullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i)]
variable
[HasPullback (diagonal i)
(pullback.map (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) i i f g (𝟙 _) (Category.comp_id _) (Category.comp_id _))]
/-- This iso witnesses the fact that
given `f : X ⟶ T`, `g : Y ⟶ T`, and `i : T ⟶ S`, the diagram
X ×ₜ Y ⟶ X ×ₛ Y
| |
| |
↓ ↓
T ⟶ T ×ₛ T
is a pullback square.
Also see `pullback_map_diagonal_isPullback`.
-/
def pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso :
pullback (diagonal i)
(pullback.map (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) i i f g (𝟙 _) (Category.comp_id _) (Category.comp_id _)) ≅
pullback f g := by
refine ?_ ≪≫
pullbackDiagonalMapIso i (𝟙 _) (f ≫ inv pullback.fst) (g ≫ inv pullback.fst) ≪≫ ?_
· refine @asIso _ _ _ _ (pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 T) ((pullback.congrHom ?_ ?_).hom) (𝟙 _) ?_ ?_)
?_
· rw [← Category.comp_id pullback.snd, ← condition, Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· rw [← Category.comp_id pullback.snd, ← condition, Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· rw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
· ext <;> simp
· infer_instance
· refine @asIso _ _ _ _ (pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) pullback.fst ?_ ?_) ?_
· rw [Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
· rw [Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
· infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_id_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_hom_fst :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso f g i).hom ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst := by
delta pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_id_iso_hom_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_hom_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_hom_snd :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso f g i).hom ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd := by
delta pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_id_iso_hom_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_hom_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_inv_fst :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso f g i).inv ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst ≫ f := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, ← Category.comp_id pullback.fst, ← diagonal_fst i, pullback.condition_assoc]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_id_iso_inv_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_inv_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_inv_snd_fst :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso f g i).inv ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_id_iso_inv_snd_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_inv_snd_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_inv_snd_snd :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso f g i).inv ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.snd := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_id_iso_inv_snd_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_inv_snd_snd
theorem pullback.diagonal_comp (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f f] [HasPullback g g]
[HasPullback (f ≫ g) (f ≫ g)] :
diagonal (f ≫ g) = diagonal f ≫ (pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso f f g).inv ≫ pullback.snd := by
ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.diagonal_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.diagonal_comp
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Diagonal.lean | 278 | 287 | theorem pullback_map_diagonal_isPullback :
IsPullback (pullback.fst ≫ f)
(pullback.map f g (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) _ _ i (Category.id_comp _).symm (Category.id_comp _).symm)
(diagonal i)
(pullback.map (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) i i f g (𝟙 _) (Category.comp_id _) (Category.comp_id _)) := by |
apply IsPullback.of_iso_pullback _ (pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso f g i).symm
· simp
· ext <;> simp
· constructor
ext <;> simp [condition]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Basic
#align_import number_theory.legendre_symbol.gauss_eisenstein_lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8818fdefc78642a7e6afcd20be5c184f3c7d9699"
/-!
# Lemmas of Gauss and Eisenstein
This file contains the Lemmas of Gauss and Eisenstein on the Legendre symbol.
The main results are `ZMod.gauss_lemma` and `ZMod.eisenstein_lemma`.
-/
open Finset Nat
open scoped Nat
section GaussEisenstein
namespace ZMod
/-- The image of the map sending a nonzero natural number `x ≤ p / 2` to the absolute value
of the integer in `(-p/2, p/2]` that is congruent to `a * x mod p` is the set
of nonzero natural numbers `x` such that `x ≤ p / 2`. -/
theorem Ico_map_valMinAbs_natAbs_eq_Ico_map_id (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] (a : ZMod p)
(hap : a ≠ 0) : ((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).1.map fun (x : ℕ) => (a * x).valMinAbs.natAbs) =
(Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).1.map fun a => a := by
have he : ∀ {x}, x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ → x ≠ 0 ∧ x ≤ p / 2 := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
have hep : ∀ {x}, x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ → x < p := fun hx =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (he hx).2 (Nat.div_lt_self hp.1.pos (by decide))
have hpe : ∀ {x}, x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ → ¬p ∣ x := fun hx hpx =>
not_lt_of_ge (le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (he hx).1) hpx) (hep hx)
have hmem : ∀ (x : ℕ) (hx : x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ),
(a * x : ZMod p).valMinAbs.natAbs ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ := by
intro x hx
simp [hap, CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod p) p, hpe hx, Nat.lt_succ_iff, succ_le_iff,
pos_iff_ne_zero, natAbs_valMinAbs_le _]
have hsurj : ∀ (b : ℕ) (hb : b ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ),
∃ x, ∃ _ : x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, (a * x : ZMod p).valMinAbs.natAbs = b := by
intro b hb
refine ⟨(b / a : ZMod p).valMinAbs.natAbs, mem_Ico.mpr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, hap, CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod p) p, hpe hb, not_false_iff,
valMinAbs_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero, Int.natAbs_eq_zero, Ne, _root_.mul_eq_zero, or_self_iff]
· apply lt_succ_of_le; apply natAbs_valMinAbs_le
· rw [natCast_natAbs_valMinAbs]
split_ifs
· erw [mul_div_cancel₀ _ hap, valMinAbs_def_pos, val_cast_of_lt (hep hb),
if_pos (le_of_lt_succ (mem_Ico.1 hb).2), Int.natAbs_ofNat]
· erw [mul_neg, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hap, natAbs_valMinAbs_neg, valMinAbs_def_pos,
val_cast_of_lt (hep hb), if_pos (le_of_lt_succ (mem_Ico.1 hb).2), Int.natAbs_ofNat]
exact Multiset.map_eq_map_of_bij_of_nodup _ _ (Finset.nodup _) (Finset.nodup _)
(fun x _ => (a * x : ZMod p).valMinAbs.natAbs) hmem
(inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le _ hmem hsurj le_rfl) hsurj (fun _ _ => rfl)
#align zmod.Ico_map_val_min_abs_nat_abs_eq_Ico_map_id ZMod.Ico_map_valMinAbs_natAbs_eq_Ico_map_id
private theorem gauss_lemma_aux₁ (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ}
(hap : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) : (a ^ (p / 2) * (p / 2)! : ZMod p) =
(-1 : ZMod p) ^ ((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ =>
¬(a * x : ZMod p).val ≤ p / 2).card * (p / 2)! :=
calc
(a ^ (p / 2) * (p / 2)! : ZMod p) = ∏ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, a * x := by
rw [prod_mul_distrib, ← prod_natCast, prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial, prod_const, card_Ico,
Nat.add_one_sub_one]; simp
_ = ∏ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, ↑((a * x : ZMod p).val) := by simp
_ = ∏ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, (if (a * x : ZMod p).val ≤ p / 2 then (1 : ZMod p) else -1) *
(a * x : ZMod p).valMinAbs.natAbs :=
(prod_congr rfl fun _ _ => by
simp only [natCast_natAbs_valMinAbs]
split_ifs <;> simp)
_ = (-1 : ZMod p) ^ ((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ =>
¬(a * x : ZMod p).val ≤ p / 2).card * ∏ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ,
↑((a * x : ZMod p).valMinAbs.natAbs) := by
have :
(∏ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, if (a * x : ZMod p).val ≤ p / 2 then (1 : ZMod p) else -1) =
∏ x ∈ (Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ => ¬(a * x : ZMod p).val ≤ p / 2, -1 :=
prod_bij_ne_one (fun x _ _ => x)
(fun x => by split_ifs <;> (dsimp; simp_all))
(fun _ _ _ _ _ _ => id) (fun b h _ => ⟨b, by simp_all [-not_le]⟩)
(by intros; split_ifs at * <;> simp_all)
rw [prod_mul_distrib, this, prod_const]
_ = (-1 : ZMod p) ^ ((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ =>
¬(a * x : ZMod p).val ≤ p / 2).card * (p / 2)! := by
rw [← prod_natCast, Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod,
Ico_map_valMinAbs_natAbs_eq_Ico_map_id p a hap, ← Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod,
prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial]
theorem gauss_lemma_aux (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ}
(hap : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) : (↑a ^ (p / 2) : ZMod p) =
((-1) ^ ((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ => p / 2 < (a * x : ZMod p).val).card :) :=
(mul_left_inj' (show ((p / 2)! : ZMod p) ≠ 0 by
rw [Ne, CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod p) p, hp.1.dvd_factorial, not_le]
exact Nat.div_lt_self hp.1.pos (by decide))).1 <| by
simpa using gauss_lemma_aux₁ p hap
#align zmod.gauss_lemma_aux ZMod.gauss_lemma_aux
/-- **Gauss' lemma**. The Legendre symbol can be computed by considering the number of naturals less
than `p/2` such that `(a * x) % p > p / 2`. -/
theorem gauss_lemma {p : ℕ} [h : Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ} (hp : p ≠ 2) (ha0 : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) :
legendreSym p a = (-1) ^ ((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ =>
p / 2 < (a * x : ZMod p).val).card := by
replace hp : Odd p := h.out.odd_of_ne_two hp
have : (legendreSym p a : ZMod p) = (((-1) ^ ((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ =>
p / 2 < (a * x : ZMod p).val).card : ℤ) : ZMod p) := by
rw [legendreSym.eq_pow, gauss_lemma_aux p ha0]
cases legendreSym.eq_one_or_neg_one p ha0 <;>
cases neg_one_pow_eq_or ℤ
((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ => p / 2 < (a * x : ZMod p).val).card <;>
simp_all [ne_neg_self hp one_ne_zero, (ne_neg_self hp one_ne_zero).symm]
#align zmod.gauss_lemma ZMod.gauss_lemma
private theorem eisenstein_lemma_aux₁ (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] [hp2 : Fact (p % 2 = 1)] {a : ℕ}
(hap : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) : ((∑ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, a * x : ℕ) : ZMod 2) =
((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ => p / 2 < (a * x : ZMod p).val).card +
∑ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, x + (∑ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, a * x / p : ℕ) :=
have hp2 : (p : ZMod 2) = (1 : ℕ) := (eq_iff_modEq_nat _).2 hp2.1
calc
((∑ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, a * x : ℕ) : ZMod 2) =
((∑ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, (a * x % p + p * (a * x / p)) : ℕ) : ZMod 2) := by
simp only [mod_add_div]
_ = (∑ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, ((a * x : ℕ) : ZMod p).val : ℕ) +
(∑ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, a * x / p : ℕ) := by
simp only [val_natCast]
simp [sum_add_distrib, ← mul_sum, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_sum, hp2]
_ = _ :=
congr_arg₂ (· + ·)
(calc
((∑ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, ((a * x : ℕ) : ZMod p).val : ℕ) : ZMod 2) =
∑ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, (((a * x : ZMod p).valMinAbs +
if (a * x : ZMod p).val ≤ p / 2 then 0 else p : ℤ) : ZMod 2) := by
simp only [(val_eq_ite_valMinAbs _).symm]; simp [Nat.cast_sum]
_ = ((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ => p / 2 < (a * x : ZMod p).val).card +
(∑ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, (a * x : ZMod p).valMinAbs.natAbs : ℕ) := by
simp [add_comm, sum_add_distrib, Finset.sum_ite, hp2, Nat.cast_sum]
_ = _ := by
rw [Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum, Ico_map_valMinAbs_natAbs_eq_Ico_map_id p a hap, ←
Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum])
rfl
theorem eisenstein_lemma_aux (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] [Fact (p % 2 = 1)] {a : ℕ} (ha2 : a % 2 = 1)
(hap : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) :
((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ => p / 2 < (a * x : ZMod p).val).card ≡
∑ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, x * a / p [MOD 2] :=
have ha2 : (a : ZMod 2) = (1 : ℕ) := (eq_iff_modEq_nat _).2 ha2
(eq_iff_modEq_nat 2).1 <| sub_eq_zero.1 <| by
simpa [add_left_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, ← mul_sum, mul_comm, ha2, Nat.cast_sum,
add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add.symm, neg_eq_self_mod_two, add_assoc] using
Eq.symm (eisenstein_lemma_aux₁ p hap)
#align zmod.eisenstein_lemma_aux ZMod.eisenstein_lemma_aux
theorem div_eq_filter_card {a b c : ℕ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (hc : a / b ≤ c) :
a / b = ((Ico 1 c.succ).filter fun x => x * b ≤ a).card :=
calc
a / b = (Ico 1 (a / b).succ).card := by simp
_ = ((Ico 1 c.succ).filter fun x => x * b ≤ a).card :=
congr_arg _ <| Finset.ext fun x => by
have : x * b ≤ a → x ≤ c := fun h => le_trans (by rwa [le_div_iff_mul_le hb0]) hc
simp [Nat.lt_succ_iff, le_div_iff_mul_le hb0]; tauto
#align zmod.div_eq_filter_card ZMod.div_eq_filter_card
/-- The given sum is the number of integer points in the triangle formed by the diagonal of the
rectangle `(0, p/2) × (0, q/2)`. -/
private theorem sum_Ico_eq_card_lt {p q : ℕ} :
∑ a ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, a * q / p =
((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ × ℕ =>
x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q).card :=
if hp0 : p = 0 then by simp [hp0, Finset.ext_iff]
else
calc
∑ a ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, a * q / p =
∑ a ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, ((Ico 1 (q / 2).succ).filter fun x => x * p ≤ a * q).card :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hx => div_eq_filter_card (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp0) <|
calc
x * q / p ≤ p / 2 * q / p := by have := le_of_lt_succ (mem_Ico.mp hx).2; gcongr
_ ≤ _ := Nat.div_mul_div_le_div _ _ _
_ = _ := by
rw [← card_sigma]
exact card_nbij' (fun a ↦ ⟨a.1, a.2⟩) (fun a ↦ ⟨a.1, a.2⟩)
(by simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mem_filter, mem_sigma, and_self_iff,
forall_true_iff, mem_product])
(by simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mem_filter, mem_sigma, and_self_iff,
forall_true_iff, mem_product]) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
/-- Each of the sums in this lemma is the cardinality of the set of integer points in each of the
two triangles formed by the diagonal of the rectangle `(0, p/2) × (0, q/2)`. Adding them
gives the number of points in the rectangle. -/
theorem sum_mul_div_add_sum_mul_div_eq_mul (p q : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hq0 : (q : ZMod p) ≠ 0) :
∑ a ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, a * q / p + ∑ a ∈ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ, a * p / q =
p / 2 * (q / 2) := by
have hswap :
((Ico 1 (q / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ × ℕ => x.2 * q ≤ x.1 * p).card =
((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ × ℕ =>
x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p).card :=
card_equiv (Equiv.prodComm _ _)
(fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mem_filter, and_self_iff, Prod.swap_prod_mk,
forall_true_iff, mem_product, Equiv.prodComm_apply, and_assoc, and_left_comm])
have hdisj :
Disjoint ((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ × ℕ => x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q)
((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ × ℕ => x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p) := by
apply disjoint_filter.2 fun x hx hpq hqp => ?_
have hxp : x.1 < p := lt_of_le_of_lt
(show x.1 ≤ p / 2 by simp_all only [Nat.lt_succ_iff, mem_Ico, mem_product])
(Nat.div_lt_self hp.1.pos (by decide))
have : (x.1 : ZMod p) = 0 := by
simpa [hq0] using congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod p) (le_antisymm hpq hqp)
apply_fun ZMod.val at this
rw [val_cast_of_lt hxp, val_zero] at this
simp only [this, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mem_Ico, one_ne_zero, false_and_iff, mem_product] at hx
have hunion :
(((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ × ℕ => x.2 * p ≤ x.1 * q) ∪
(Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ).filter fun x : ℕ × ℕ => x.1 * q ≤ x.2 * p) =
Ico 1 (p / 2).succ ×ˢ Ico 1 (q / 2).succ :=
Finset.ext fun x => by
have := le_total (x.2 * p) (x.1 * q)
simp only [mem_union, mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_product]
tauto
rw [sum_Ico_eq_card_lt, sum_Ico_eq_card_lt, hswap, ← card_union_of_disjoint hdisj, hunion,
card_product]
simp only [card_Ico, tsub_zero, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
#align zmod.sum_mul_div_add_sum_mul_div_eq_mul ZMod.sum_mul_div_add_sum_mul_div_eq_mul
/-- **Eisenstein's lemma** -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/GaussEisensteinLemmas.lean | 230 | 236 | theorem eisenstein_lemma {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (hp : p ≠ 2) {a : ℕ} (ha1 : a % 2 = 1)
(ha0 : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) : legendreSym p a = (-1) ^ ∑ x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, x * a / p := by |
haveI hp' : Fact (p % 2 = 1) := ⟨Nat.Prime.mod_two_eq_one_iff_ne_two.mpr hp⟩
have ha0' : ((a : ℤ) : ZMod p) ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
rw [neg_one_pow_eq_pow_mod_two, gauss_lemma hp ha0', neg_one_pow_eq_pow_mod_two,
(by norm_cast : ((a : ℤ) : ZMod p) = (a : ZMod p)),
show _ = _ from eisenstein_lemma_aux p ha1 ha0]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Set
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Set
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.ULift
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Set
import Mathlib.Order.SetNotation
#align_import order.complete_lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5709b0d8725255e76f47debca6400c07b5c2d8e6"
/-!
# Theory of complete lattices
## Main definitions
* `sSup` and `sInf` are the supremum and the infimum of a set;
* `iSup (f : ι → α)` and `iInf (f : ι → α)` are indexed supremum and infimum of a function,
defined as `sSup` and `sInf` of the range of this function;
* class `CompleteLattice`: a bounded lattice such that `sSup s` is always the least upper boundary
of `s` and `sInf s` is always the greatest lower boundary of `s`;
* class `CompleteLinearOrder`: a linear ordered complete lattice.
## Naming conventions
In lemma names,
* `sSup` is called `sSup`
* `sInf` is called `sInf`
* `⨆ i, s i` is called `iSup`
* `⨅ i, s i` is called `iInf`
* `⨆ i j, s i j` is called `iSup₂`. This is an `iSup` inside an `iSup`.
* `⨅ i j, s i j` is called `iInf₂`. This is an `iInf` inside an `iInf`.
* `⨆ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biSup` for "bounded `iSup`". This is the special case of `iSup₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⨅ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInf` for "bounded `iInf`". This is the special case of `iInf₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⨆ i, f i` : `iSup f`, the supremum of the range of `f`;
* `⨅ i, f i` : `iInf f`, the infimum of the range of `f`.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β β₂ γ : Type*} {ι ι' : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
instance OrderDual.supSet (α) [InfSet α] : SupSet αᵒᵈ :=
⟨(sInf : Set α → α)⟩
instance OrderDual.infSet (α) [SupSet α] : InfSet αᵒᵈ :=
⟨(sSup : Set α → α)⟩
/-- Note that we rarely use `CompleteSemilatticeSup`
(in fact, any such object is always a `CompleteLattice`, so it's usually best to start there).
Nevertheless it is sometimes a useful intermediate step in constructions.
-/
class CompleteSemilatticeSup (α : Type*) extends PartialOrder α, SupSet α where
/-- Any element of a set is less than the set supremum. -/
le_sSup : ∀ s, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ sSup s
/-- Any upper bound is more than the set supremum. -/
sSup_le : ∀ s a, (∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) → sSup s ≤ a
#align complete_semilattice_Sup CompleteSemilatticeSup
section
variable [CompleteSemilatticeSup α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem le_sSup : a ∈ s → a ≤ sSup s :=
CompleteSemilatticeSup.le_sSup s a
#align le_Sup le_sSup
theorem sSup_le : (∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) → sSup s ≤ a :=
CompleteSemilatticeSup.sSup_le s a
#align Sup_le sSup_le
theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set α) : IsLUB s (sSup s) :=
⟨fun _ ↦ le_sSup, fun _ ↦ sSup_le⟩
#align is_lub_Sup isLUB_sSup
lemma isLUB_iff_sSup_eq : IsLUB s a ↔ sSup s = a :=
⟨(isLUB_sSup s).unique, by rintro rfl; exact isLUB_sSup _⟩
alias ⟨IsLUB.sSup_eq, _⟩ := isLUB_iff_sSup_eq
#align is_lub.Sup_eq IsLUB.sSup_eq
theorem le_sSup_of_le (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ sSup s :=
le_trans h (le_sSup hb)
#align le_Sup_of_le le_sSup_of_le
@[gcongr]
theorem sSup_le_sSup (h : s ⊆ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t :=
(isLUB_sSup s).mono (isLUB_sSup t) h
#align Sup_le_Sup sSup_le_sSup
@[simp]
theorem sSup_le_iff : sSup s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a :=
isLUB_le_iff (isLUB_sSup s)
#align Sup_le_iff sSup_le_iff
theorem le_sSup_iff : a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ b ∈ upperBounds s, a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans h (sSup_le hb), fun hb => hb _ fun _ => le_sSup⟩
#align le_Sup_iff le_sSup_iff
theorem le_iSup_iff {s : ι → α} : a ≤ iSup s ↔ ∀ b, (∀ i, s i ≤ b) → a ≤ b := by
simp [iSup, le_sSup_iff, upperBounds]
#align le_supr_iff le_iSup_iff
theorem sSup_le_sSup_of_forall_exists_le (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) : sSup s ≤ sSup t :=
le_sSup_iff.2 fun _ hb =>
sSup_le fun a ha =>
let ⟨_, hct, hac⟩ := h a ha
hac.trans (hb hct)
#align Sup_le_Sup_of_forall_exists_le sSup_le_sSup_of_forall_exists_le
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `csSup_singleton`.
theorem sSup_singleton {a : α} : sSup {a} = a :=
isLUB_singleton.sSup_eq
#align Sup_singleton sSup_singleton
end
/-- Note that we rarely use `CompleteSemilatticeInf`
(in fact, any such object is always a `CompleteLattice`, so it's usually best to start there).
Nevertheless it is sometimes a useful intermediate step in constructions.
-/
class CompleteSemilatticeInf (α : Type*) extends PartialOrder α, InfSet α where
/-- Any element of a set is more than the set infimum. -/
sInf_le : ∀ s, ∀ a ∈ s, sInf s ≤ a
/-- Any lower bound is less than the set infimum. -/
le_sInf : ∀ s a, (∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) → a ≤ sInf s
#align complete_semilattice_Inf CompleteSemilatticeInf
section
variable [CompleteSemilatticeInf α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem sInf_le : a ∈ s → sInf s ≤ a :=
CompleteSemilatticeInf.sInf_le s a
#align Inf_le sInf_le
theorem le_sInf : (∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) → a ≤ sInf s :=
CompleteSemilatticeInf.le_sInf s a
#align le_Inf le_sInf
theorem isGLB_sInf (s : Set α) : IsGLB s (sInf s) :=
⟨fun _ => sInf_le, fun _ => le_sInf⟩
#align is_glb_Inf isGLB_sInf
lemma isGLB_iff_sInf_eq : IsGLB s a ↔ sInf s = a :=
⟨(isGLB_sInf s).unique, by rintro rfl; exact isGLB_sInf _⟩
alias ⟨IsGLB.sInf_eq, _⟩ := isGLB_iff_sInf_eq
#align is_glb.Inf_eq IsGLB.sInf_eq
theorem sInf_le_of_le (hb : b ∈ s) (h : b ≤ a) : sInf s ≤ a :=
le_trans (sInf_le hb) h
#align Inf_le_of_le sInf_le_of_le
@[gcongr]
theorem sInf_le_sInf (h : s ⊆ t) : sInf t ≤ sInf s :=
(isGLB_sInf s).mono (isGLB_sInf t) h
#align Inf_le_Inf sInf_le_sInf
@[simp]
theorem le_sInf_iff : a ≤ sInf s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b :=
le_isGLB_iff (isGLB_sInf s)
#align le_Inf_iff le_sInf_iff
theorem sInf_le_iff : sInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ lowerBounds s, b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans (le_sInf hb) h, fun hb => hb _ fun _ => sInf_le⟩
#align Inf_le_iff sInf_le_iff
theorem iInf_le_iff {s : ι → α} : iInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b, (∀ i, b ≤ s i) → b ≤ a := by
simp [iInf, sInf_le_iff, lowerBounds]
#align infi_le_iff iInf_le_iff
theorem sInf_le_sInf_of_forall_exists_le (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, y ≤ x) : sInf t ≤ sInf s :=
le_sInf fun x hx ↦ let ⟨_y, hyt, hyx⟩ := h x hx; sInf_le_of_le hyt hyx
#align Inf_le_Inf_of_forall_exists_le sInf_le_sInf_of_forall_exists_le
-- We will generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `csInf_singleton`.
theorem sInf_singleton {a : α} : sInf {a} = a :=
isGLB_singleton.sInf_eq
#align Inf_singleton sInf_singleton
end
/-- A complete lattice is a bounded lattice which has suprema and infima for every subset. -/
class CompleteLattice (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, CompleteSemilatticeSup α,
CompleteSemilatticeInf α, Top α, Bot α where
/-- Any element is less than the top one. -/
protected le_top : ∀ x : α, x ≤ ⊤
/-- Any element is more than the bottom one. -/
protected bot_le : ∀ x : α, ⊥ ≤ x
#align complete_lattice CompleteLattice
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLattice.toBoundedOrder [h : CompleteLattice α] :
BoundedOrder α :=
{ h with }
#align complete_lattice.to_bounded_order CompleteLattice.toBoundedOrder
/-- Create a `CompleteLattice` from a `PartialOrder` and `InfSet`
that returns the greatest lower bound of a set. Usually this constructor provides
poor definitional equalities. If other fields are known explicitly, they should be
provided; for example, if `inf` is known explicitly, construct the `CompleteLattice`
instance as
```
instance : CompleteLattice my_T where
inf := better_inf
le_inf := ...
inf_le_right := ...
inf_le_left := ...
-- don't care to fix sup, sSup, bot, top
__ := completeLatticeOfInf my_T _
```
-/
def completeLatticeOfInf (α : Type*) [H1 : PartialOrder α] [H2 : InfSet α]
(isGLB_sInf : ∀ s : Set α, IsGLB s (sInf s)) : CompleteLattice α where
__ := H1; __ := H2
bot := sInf univ
bot_le x := (isGLB_sInf univ).1 trivial
top := sInf ∅
le_top a := (isGLB_sInf ∅).2 <| by simp
sup a b := sInf { x : α | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
inf a b := sInf {a, b}
le_inf a b c hab hac := by
apply (isGLB_sInf _).2
simp [*]
inf_le_right a b := (isGLB_sInf _).1 <| mem_insert_of_mem _ <| mem_singleton _
inf_le_left a b := (isGLB_sInf _).1 <| mem_insert _ _
sup_le a b c hac hbc := (isGLB_sInf _).1 <| by simp [*]
le_sup_left a b := (isGLB_sInf _).2 fun x => And.left
le_sup_right a b := (isGLB_sInf _).2 fun x => And.right
le_sInf s a ha := (isGLB_sInf s).2 ha
sInf_le s a ha := (isGLB_sInf s).1 ha
sSup s := sInf (upperBounds s)
le_sSup s a ha := (isGLB_sInf (upperBounds s)).2 fun b hb => hb ha
sSup_le s a ha := (isGLB_sInf (upperBounds s)).1 ha
#align complete_lattice_of_Inf completeLatticeOfInf
/-- Any `CompleteSemilatticeInf` is in fact a `CompleteLattice`.
Note that this construction has bad definitional properties:
see the doc-string on `completeLatticeOfInf`.
-/
def completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (α : Type*) [CompleteSemilatticeInf α] :
CompleteLattice α :=
completeLatticeOfInf α fun s => isGLB_sInf s
#align complete_lattice_of_complete_semilattice_Inf completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf
/-- Create a `CompleteLattice` from a `PartialOrder` and `SupSet`
that returns the least upper bound of a set. Usually this constructor provides
poor definitional equalities. If other fields are known explicitly, they should be
provided; for example, if `inf` is known explicitly, construct the `CompleteLattice`
instance as
```
instance : CompleteLattice my_T where
inf := better_inf
le_inf := ...
inf_le_right := ...
inf_le_left := ...
-- don't care to fix sup, sInf, bot, top
__ := completeLatticeOfSup my_T _
```
-/
def completeLatticeOfSup (α : Type*) [H1 : PartialOrder α] [H2 : SupSet α]
(isLUB_sSup : ∀ s : Set α, IsLUB s (sSup s)) : CompleteLattice α where
__ := H1; __ := H2
top := sSup univ
le_top x := (isLUB_sSup univ).1 trivial
bot := sSup ∅
bot_le x := (isLUB_sSup ∅).2 <| by simp
sup a b := sSup {a, b}
sup_le a b c hac hbc := (isLUB_sSup _).2 (by simp [*])
le_sup_left a b := (isLUB_sSup _).1 <| mem_insert _ _
le_sup_right a b := (isLUB_sSup _).1 <| mem_insert_of_mem _ <| mem_singleton _
inf a b := sSup { x | x ≤ a ∧ x ≤ b }
le_inf a b c hab hac := (isLUB_sSup _).1 <| by simp [*]
inf_le_left a b := (isLUB_sSup _).2 fun x => And.left
inf_le_right a b := (isLUB_sSup _).2 fun x => And.right
sInf s := sSup (lowerBounds s)
sSup_le s a ha := (isLUB_sSup s).2 ha
le_sSup s a ha := (isLUB_sSup s).1 ha
sInf_le s a ha := (isLUB_sSup (lowerBounds s)).2 fun b hb => hb ha
le_sInf s a ha := (isLUB_sSup (lowerBounds s)).1 ha
#align complete_lattice_of_Sup completeLatticeOfSup
/-- Any `CompleteSemilatticeSup` is in fact a `CompleteLattice`.
Note that this construction has bad definitional properties:
see the doc-string on `completeLatticeOfSup`.
-/
def completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeSup (α : Type*) [CompleteSemilatticeSup α] :
CompleteLattice α :=
completeLatticeOfSup α fun s => isLUB_sSup s
#align complete_lattice_of_complete_semilattice_Sup completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeSup
-- Porting note: as we cannot rename fields while extending,
-- `CompleteLinearOrder` does not directly extend `LinearOrder`.
-- Instead we add the fields by hand, and write a manual instance.
/-- A complete linear order is a linear order whose lattice structure is complete. -/
class CompleteLinearOrder (α : Type*) extends CompleteLattice α where
/-- A linear order is total. -/
le_total (a b : α) : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a
/-- In a linearly ordered type, we assume the order relations are all decidable. -/
decidableLE : DecidableRel (· ≤ · : α → α → Prop)
/-- In a linearly ordered type, we assume the order relations are all decidable. -/
decidableEq : DecidableEq α := @decidableEqOfDecidableLE _ _ decidableLE
/-- In a linearly ordered type, we assume the order relations are all decidable. -/
decidableLT : DecidableRel (· < · : α → α → Prop) :=
@decidableLTOfDecidableLE _ _ decidableLE
#align complete_linear_order CompleteLinearOrder
instance CompleteLinearOrder.toLinearOrder [i : CompleteLinearOrder α] : LinearOrder α where
__ := i
min := Inf.inf
max := Sup.sup
min_def a b := by
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· simp [(CompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b).resolve_left h]
max_def a b := by
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· simp [(CompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b).resolve_left h]
namespace OrderDual
instance instCompleteLattice [CompleteLattice α] : CompleteLattice αᵒᵈ where
__ := instBoundedOrder α
le_sSup := @CompleteLattice.sInf_le α _
sSup_le := @CompleteLattice.le_sInf α _
sInf_le := @CompleteLattice.le_sSup α _
le_sInf := @CompleteLattice.sSup_le α _
instance instCompleteLinearOrder [CompleteLinearOrder α] : CompleteLinearOrder αᵒᵈ where
__ := instCompleteLattice
__ := instLinearOrder α
end OrderDual
open OrderDual
section
variable [CompleteLattice α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem toDual_sSup (s : Set α) : toDual (sSup s) = sInf (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
#align to_dual_Sup toDual_sSup
@[simp]
theorem toDual_sInf (s : Set α) : toDual (sInf s) = sSup (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
#align to_dual_Inf toDual_sInf
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_sSup (s : Set αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (sSup s) = sInf (toDual ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
#align of_dual_Sup ofDual_sSup
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_sInf (s : Set αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (sInf s) = sSup (toDual ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
#align of_dual_Inf ofDual_sInf
@[simp]
theorem toDual_iSup (f : ι → α) : toDual (⨆ i, f i) = ⨅ i, toDual (f i) :=
rfl
#align to_dual_supr toDual_iSup
@[simp]
theorem toDual_iInf (f : ι → α) : toDual (⨅ i, f i) = ⨆ i, toDual (f i) :=
rfl
#align to_dual_infi toDual_iInf
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_iSup (f : ι → αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (⨆ i, f i) = ⨅ i, ofDual (f i) :=
rfl
#align of_dual_supr ofDual_iSup
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_iInf (f : ι → αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (⨅ i, f i) = ⨆ i, ofDual (f i) :=
rfl
#align of_dual_infi ofDual_iInf
theorem sInf_le_sSup (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ≤ sSup s :=
isGLB_le_isLUB (isGLB_sInf s) (isLUB_sSup s) hs
#align Inf_le_Sup sInf_le_sSup
theorem sSup_union {s t : Set α} : sSup (s ∪ t) = sSup s ⊔ sSup t :=
((isLUB_sSup s).union (isLUB_sSup t)).sSup_eq
#align Sup_union sSup_union
theorem sInf_union {s t : Set α} : sInf (s ∪ t) = sInf s ⊓ sInf t :=
((isGLB_sInf s).union (isGLB_sInf t)).sInf_eq
#align Inf_union sInf_union
theorem sSup_inter_le {s t : Set α} : sSup (s ∩ t) ≤ sSup s ⊓ sSup t :=
sSup_le fun _ hb => le_inf (le_sSup hb.1) (le_sSup hb.2)
#align Sup_inter_le sSup_inter_le
theorem le_sInf_inter {s t : Set α} : sInf s ⊔ sInf t ≤ sInf (s ∩ t) :=
@sSup_inter_le αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align le_Inf_inter le_sInf_inter
@[simp]
theorem sSup_empty : sSup ∅ = (⊥ : α) :=
(@isLUB_empty α _ _).sSup_eq
#align Sup_empty sSup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf ∅ = (⊤ : α) :=
(@isGLB_empty α _ _).sInf_eq
#align Inf_empty sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem sSup_univ : sSup univ = (⊤ : α) :=
(@isLUB_univ α _ _).sSup_eq
#align Sup_univ sSup_univ
@[simp]
theorem sInf_univ : sInf univ = (⊥ : α) :=
(@isGLB_univ α _ _).sInf_eq
#align Inf_univ sInf_univ
-- TODO(Jeremy): get this automatically
@[simp]
theorem sSup_insert {a : α} {s : Set α} : sSup (insert a s) = a ⊔ sSup s :=
((isLUB_sSup s).insert a).sSup_eq
#align Sup_insert sSup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInf_insert {a : α} {s : Set α} : sInf (insert a s) = a ⊓ sInf s :=
((isGLB_sInf s).insert a).sInf_eq
#align Inf_insert sInf_insert
theorem sSup_le_sSup_of_subset_insert_bot (h : s ⊆ insert ⊥ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t :=
(sSup_le_sSup h).trans_eq (sSup_insert.trans (bot_sup_eq _))
#align Sup_le_Sup_of_subset_insert_bot sSup_le_sSup_of_subset_insert_bot
theorem sInf_le_sInf_of_subset_insert_top (h : s ⊆ insert ⊤ t) : sInf t ≤ sInf s :=
(sInf_le_sInf h).trans_eq' (sInf_insert.trans (top_inf_eq _)).symm
#align Inf_le_Inf_of_subset_insert_top sInf_le_sInf_of_subset_insert_top
@[simp]
theorem sSup_diff_singleton_bot (s : Set α) : sSup (s \ {⊥}) = sSup s :=
(sSup_le_sSup diff_subset).antisymm <|
sSup_le_sSup_of_subset_insert_bot <| subset_insert_diff_singleton _ _
#align Sup_diff_singleton_bot sSup_diff_singleton_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInf_diff_singleton_top (s : Set α) : sInf (s \ {⊤}) = sInf s :=
@sSup_diff_singleton_bot αᵒᵈ _ s
#align Inf_diff_singleton_top sInf_diff_singleton_top
theorem sSup_pair {a b : α} : sSup {a, b} = a ⊔ b :=
(@isLUB_pair α _ a b).sSup_eq
#align Sup_pair sSup_pair
theorem sInf_pair {a b : α} : sInf {a, b} = a ⊓ b :=
(@isGLB_pair α _ a b).sInf_eq
#align Inf_pair sInf_pair
@[simp]
theorem sSup_eq_bot : sSup s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, a = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h _ ha => bot_unique <| h ▸ le_sSup ha, fun h =>
bot_unique <| sSup_le fun a ha => le_bot_iff.2 <| h a ha⟩
#align Sup_eq_bot sSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInf_eq_top : sInf s = ⊤ ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, a = ⊤ :=
@sSup_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _
#align Inf_eq_top sInf_eq_top
theorem eq_singleton_bot_of_sSup_eq_bot_of_nonempty {s : Set α} (h_sup : sSup s = ⊥)
(hne : s.Nonempty) : s = {⊥} := by
rw [Set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem]
rw [sSup_eq_bot] at h_sup
exact ⟨hne, h_sup⟩
#align eq_singleton_bot_of_Sup_eq_bot_of_nonempty eq_singleton_bot_of_sSup_eq_bot_of_nonempty
theorem eq_singleton_top_of_sInf_eq_top_of_nonempty : sInf s = ⊤ → s.Nonempty → s = {⊤} :=
@eq_singleton_bot_of_sSup_eq_bot_of_nonempty αᵒᵈ _ _
#align eq_singleton_top_of_Inf_eq_top_of_nonempty eq_singleton_top_of_sInf_eq_top_of_nonempty
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w < b`.
See `csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (h₁ : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ b)
(h₂ : ∀ w, w < b → ∃ a ∈ s, w < a) : sSup s = b :=
(sSup_le h₁).eq_of_not_lt fun h =>
let ⟨_, ha, ha'⟩ := h₂ _ h
((le_sSup ha).trans_lt ha').false
#align Sup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w > b`.
See `csInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem sInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt :
(∀ a ∈ s, b ≤ a) → (∀ w, b < w → ∃ a ∈ s, a < w) → sInf s = b :=
@sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align Inf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt sInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
end
section CompleteLinearOrder
variable [CompleteLinearOrder α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem lt_sSup_iff : b < sSup s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b < a :=
lt_isLUB_iff <| isLUB_sSup s
#align lt_Sup_iff lt_sSup_iff
theorem sInf_lt_iff : sInf s < b ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, a < b :=
isGLB_lt_iff <| isGLB_sInf s
#align Inf_lt_iff sInf_lt_iff
theorem sSup_eq_top : sSup s = ⊤ ↔ ∀ b < ⊤, ∃ a ∈ s, b < a :=
⟨fun h _ hb => lt_sSup_iff.1 <| hb.trans_eq h.symm, fun h =>
top_unique <|
le_of_not_gt fun h' =>
let ⟨_, ha, h⟩ := h _ h'
(h.trans_le <| le_sSup ha).false⟩
#align Sup_eq_top sSup_eq_top
theorem sInf_eq_bot : sInf s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ b > ⊥, ∃ a ∈ s, a < b :=
@sSup_eq_top αᵒᵈ _ _
#align Inf_eq_bot sInf_eq_bot
theorem lt_iSup_iff {f : ι → α} : a < iSup f ↔ ∃ i, a < f i :=
lt_sSup_iff.trans exists_range_iff
#align lt_supr_iff lt_iSup_iff
theorem iInf_lt_iff {f : ι → α} : iInf f < a ↔ ∃ i, f i < a :=
sInf_lt_iff.trans exists_range_iff
#align infi_lt_iff iInf_lt_iff
end CompleteLinearOrder
/-
### iSup & iInf
-/
section SupSet
variable [SupSet α] {f g : ι → α}
theorem sSup_range : sSup (range f) = iSup f :=
rfl
#align Sup_range sSup_range
theorem sSup_eq_iSup' (s : Set α) : sSup s = ⨆ a : s, (a : α) := by rw [iSup, Subtype.range_coe]
#align Sup_eq_supr' sSup_eq_iSup'
theorem iSup_congr (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : ⨆ i, f i = ⨆ i, g i :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
#align supr_congr iSup_congr
theorem biSup_congr {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∀ i, p i → f i = g i) :
⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), g i :=
iSup_congr fun i ↦ iSup_congr (h i)
theorem biSup_congr' {p : ι → Prop} {f g : (i : ι) → p i → α}
(h : ∀ i (hi : p i), f i hi = g i hi) :
⨆ i, ⨆ (hi : p i), f i hi = ⨆ i, ⨆ (hi : p i), g i hi := by
congr; ext i; congr; ext hi; exact h i hi
theorem Function.Surjective.iSup_comp {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
⨆ x, g (f x) = ⨆ y, g y := by
simp only [iSup.eq_1]
congr
exact hf.range_comp g
#align function.surjective.supr_comp Function.Surjective.iSup_comp
theorem Equiv.iSup_comp {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') : ⨆ x, g (e x) = ⨆ y, g y :=
e.surjective.iSup_comp _
#align equiv.supr_comp Equiv.iSup_comp
protected theorem Function.Surjective.iSup_congr {g : ι' → α} (h : ι → ι') (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⨆ x, f x = ⨆ y, g y := by
convert h1.iSup_comp g
exact (h2 _).symm
#align function.surjective.supr_congr Function.Surjective.iSup_congr
protected theorem Equiv.iSup_congr {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') (h : ∀ x, g (e x) = f x) :
⨆ x, f x = ⨆ y, g y :=
e.surjective.iSup_congr _ h
#align equiv.supr_congr Equiv.iSup_congr
@[congr]
theorem iSup_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → α} {f₂ : q → α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iSup f₁ = iSup f₂ := by
obtain rfl := propext pq
congr with x
apply f
#align supr_congr_Prop iSup_congr_Prop
theorem iSup_plift_up (f : PLift ι → α) : ⨆ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⨆ i, f i :=
(PLift.up_surjective.iSup_congr _) fun _ => rfl
#align supr_plift_up iSup_plift_up
theorem iSup_plift_down (f : ι → α) : ⨆ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⨆ i, f i :=
(PLift.down_surjective.iSup_congr _) fun _ => rfl
#align supr_plift_down iSup_plift_down
theorem iSup_range' (g : β → α) (f : ι → β) : ⨆ b : range f, g b = ⨆ i, g (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, ← image_eq_range, ← range_comp]
rfl
#align supr_range' iSup_range'
theorem sSup_image' {s : Set β} {f : β → α} : sSup (f '' s) = ⨆ a : s, f a := by
rw [iSup, image_eq_range]
#align Sup_image' sSup_image'
end SupSet
section InfSet
variable [InfSet α] {f g : ι → α}
theorem sInf_range : sInf (range f) = iInf f :=
rfl
#align Inf_range sInf_range
theorem sInf_eq_iInf' (s : Set α) : sInf s = ⨅ a : s, (a : α) :=
@sSup_eq_iSup' αᵒᵈ _ _
#align Inf_eq_infi' sInf_eq_iInf'
theorem iInf_congr (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : ⨅ i, f i = ⨅ i, g i :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
#align infi_congr iInf_congr
theorem biInf_congr {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∀ i, p i → f i = g i) :
⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), g i :=
biSup_congr (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem biInf_congr' {p : ι → Prop} {f g : (i : ι) → p i → α}
(h : ∀ i (hi : p i), f i hi = g i hi) :
⨅ i, ⨅ (hi : p i), f i hi = ⨅ i, ⨅ (hi : p i), g i hi := by
congr; ext i; congr; ext hi; exact h i hi
theorem Function.Surjective.iInf_comp {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
⨅ x, g (f x) = ⨅ y, g y :=
@Function.Surjective.iSup_comp αᵒᵈ _ _ _ f hf g
#align function.surjective.infi_comp Function.Surjective.iInf_comp
theorem Equiv.iInf_comp {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') : ⨅ x, g (e x) = ⨅ y, g y :=
@Equiv.iSup_comp αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ e
#align equiv.infi_comp Equiv.iInf_comp
protected theorem Function.Surjective.iInf_congr {g : ι' → α} (h : ι → ι') (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⨅ x, f x = ⨅ y, g y :=
@Function.Surjective.iSup_congr αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h h1 h2
#align function.surjective.infi_congr Function.Surjective.iInf_congr
protected theorem Equiv.iInf_congr {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') (h : ∀ x, g (e x) = f x) :
⨅ x, f x = ⨅ y, g y :=
@Equiv.iSup_congr αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ e h
#align equiv.infi_congr Equiv.iInf_congr
@[congr]
theorem iInf_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → α} {f₂ : q → α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInf f₁ = iInf f₂ :=
@iSup_congr_Prop αᵒᵈ _ p q f₁ f₂ pq f
#align infi_congr_Prop iInf_congr_Prop
theorem iInf_plift_up (f : PLift ι → α) : ⨅ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⨅ i, f i :=
(PLift.up_surjective.iInf_congr _) fun _ => rfl
#align infi_plift_up iInf_plift_up
theorem iInf_plift_down (f : ι → α) : ⨅ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⨅ i, f i :=
(PLift.down_surjective.iInf_congr _) fun _ => rfl
#align infi_plift_down iInf_plift_down
theorem iInf_range' (g : β → α) (f : ι → β) : ⨅ b : range f, g b = ⨅ i, g (f i) :=
@iSup_range' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align infi_range' iInf_range'
theorem sInf_image' {s : Set β} {f : β → α} : sInf (f '' s) = ⨅ a : s, f a :=
@sSup_image' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align Inf_image' sInf_image'
end InfSet
section
variable [CompleteLattice α] {f g s t : ι → α} {a b : α}
theorem le_iSup (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : f i ≤ iSup f :=
le_sSup ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align le_supr le_iSup
theorem iInf_le (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : iInf f ≤ f i :=
sInf_le ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align infi_le iInf_le
theorem le_iSup' (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : f i ≤ iSup f :=
le_sSup ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align le_supr' le_iSup'
theorem iInf_le' (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : iInf f ≤ f i :=
sInf_le ⟨i, rfl⟩
#align infi_le' iInf_le'
theorem isLUB_iSup : IsLUB (range f) (⨆ j, f j) :=
isLUB_sSup _
#align is_lub_supr isLUB_iSup
theorem isGLB_iInf : IsGLB (range f) (⨅ j, f j) :=
isGLB_sInf _
#align is_glb_infi isGLB_iInf
theorem IsLUB.iSup_eq (h : IsLUB (range f) a) : ⨆ j, f j = a :=
h.sSup_eq
#align is_lub.supr_eq IsLUB.iSup_eq
theorem IsGLB.iInf_eq (h : IsGLB (range f) a) : ⨅ j, f j = a :=
h.sInf_eq
#align is_glb.infi_eq IsGLB.iInf_eq
theorem le_iSup_of_le (i : ι) (h : a ≤ f i) : a ≤ iSup f :=
h.trans <| le_iSup _ i
#align le_supr_of_le le_iSup_of_le
theorem iInf_le_of_le (i : ι) (h : f i ≤ a) : iInf f ≤ a :=
(iInf_le _ i).trans h
#align infi_le_of_le iInf_le_of_le
theorem le_iSup₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : f i j ≤ ⨆ (i) (j), f i j :=
le_iSup_of_le i <| le_iSup (f i) j
#align le_supr₂ le_iSup₂
theorem iInf₂_le {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⨅ (i) (j), f i j ≤ f i j :=
iInf_le_of_le i <| iInf_le (f i) j
#align infi₂_le iInf₂_le
theorem le_iSup₂_of_le {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) (h : a ≤ f i j) :
a ≤ ⨆ (i) (j), f i j :=
h.trans <| le_iSup₂ i j
#align le_supr₂_of_le le_iSup₂_of_le
theorem iInf₂_le_of_le {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) (h : f i j ≤ a) :
⨅ (i) (j), f i j ≤ a :=
(iInf₂_le i j).trans h
#align infi₂_le_of_le iInf₂_le_of_le
theorem iSup_le (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ a) : iSup f ≤ a :=
sSup_le fun _ ⟨i, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ h i
#align supr_le iSup_le
theorem le_iInf (h : ∀ i, a ≤ f i) : a ≤ iInf f :=
le_sInf fun _ ⟨i, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ h i
#align le_infi le_iInf
theorem iSup₂_le {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, f i j ≤ a) : ⨆ (i) (j), f i j ≤ a :=
iSup_le fun i => iSup_le <| h i
#align supr₂_le iSup₂_le
theorem le_iInf₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i j) : a ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), f i j :=
le_iInf fun i => le_iInf <| h i
#align le_infi₂ le_iInf₂
theorem iSup₂_le_iSup (κ : ι → Sort*) (f : ι → α) : ⨆ (i) (_ : κ i), f i ≤ ⨆ i, f i :=
iSup₂_le fun i _ => le_iSup f i
#align supr₂_le_supr iSup₂_le_iSup
theorem iInf_le_iInf₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (f : ι → α) : ⨅ i, f i ≤ ⨅ (i) (_ : κ i), f i :=
le_iInf₂ fun i _ => iInf_le f i
#align infi_le_infi₂ iInf_le_iInf₂
@[gcongr]
theorem iSup_mono (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : iSup f ≤ iSup g :=
iSup_le fun i => le_iSup_of_le i <| h i
#align supr_mono iSup_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iInf_mono (h : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : iInf f ≤ iInf g :=
le_iInf fun i => iInf_le_of_le i <| h i
#align infi_mono iInf_mono
theorem iSup₂_mono {f g : ∀ i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, f i j ≤ g i j) :
⨆ (i) (j), f i j ≤ ⨆ (i) (j), g i j :=
iSup_mono fun i => iSup_mono <| h i
#align supr₂_mono iSup₂_mono
theorem iInf₂_mono {f g : ∀ i, κ i → α} (h : ∀ i j, f i j ≤ g i j) :
⨅ (i) (j), f i j ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), g i j :=
iInf_mono fun i => iInf_mono <| h i
#align infi₂_mono iInf₂_mono
theorem iSup_mono' {g : ι' → α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ i', f i ≤ g i') : iSup f ≤ iSup g :=
iSup_le fun i => Exists.elim (h i) le_iSup_of_le
#align supr_mono' iSup_mono'
theorem iInf_mono' {g : ι' → α} (h : ∀ i', ∃ i, f i ≤ g i') : iInf f ≤ iInf g :=
le_iInf fun i' => Exists.elim (h i') iInf_le_of_le
#align infi_mono' iInf_mono'
theorem iSup₂_mono' {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} {g : ∀ i', κ' i' → α} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', f i j ≤ g i' j') :
⨆ (i) (j), f i j ≤ ⨆ (i) (j), g i j :=
iSup₂_le fun i j =>
let ⟨i', j', h⟩ := h i j
le_iSup₂_of_le i' j' h
#align supr₂_mono' iSup₂_mono'
theorem iInf₂_mono' {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} {g : ∀ i', κ' i' → α} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', f i' j' ≤ g i j) :
⨅ (i) (j), f i j ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), g i j :=
le_iInf₂ fun i j =>
let ⟨i', j', h⟩ := h i j
iInf₂_le_of_le i' j' h
#align infi₂_mono' iInf₂_mono'
theorem iSup_const_mono (h : ι → ι') : ⨆ _ : ι, a ≤ ⨆ _ : ι', a :=
iSup_le <| le_iSup _ ∘ h
#align supr_const_mono iSup_const_mono
theorem iInf_const_mono (h : ι' → ι) : ⨅ _ : ι, a ≤ ⨅ _ : ι', a :=
le_iInf <| iInf_le _ ∘ h
#align infi_const_mono iInf_const_mono
theorem iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (f : ι → ι' → α) : ⨆ i, ⨅ j, f i j ≤ ⨅ j, ⨆ i, f i j :=
iSup_le fun i => iInf_mono fun j => le_iSup (fun i => f i j) i
#align supr_infi_le_infi_supr iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup
theorem biSup_mono {p q : ι → Prop} (hpq : ∀ i, p i → q i) :
⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i ≤ ⨆ (i) (_ : q i), f i :=
iSup_mono fun i => iSup_const_mono (hpq i)
#align bsupr_mono biSup_mono
theorem biInf_mono {p q : ι → Prop} (hpq : ∀ i, p i → q i) :
⨅ (i) (_ : q i), f i ≤ ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i :=
iInf_mono fun i => iInf_const_mono (hpq i)
#align binfi_mono biInf_mono
@[simp]
theorem iSup_le_iff : iSup f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i ≤ a :=
(isLUB_le_iff isLUB_iSup).trans forall_mem_range
#align supr_le_iff iSup_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem le_iInf_iff : a ≤ iInf f ↔ ∀ i, a ≤ f i :=
(le_isGLB_iff isGLB_iInf).trans forall_mem_range
#align le_infi_iff le_iInf_iff
theorem iSup₂_le_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} : ⨆ (i) (j), f i j ≤ a ↔ ∀ i j, f i j ≤ a := by
simp_rw [iSup_le_iff]
#align supr₂_le_iff iSup₂_le_iff
theorem le_iInf₂_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} : (a ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), f i j) ↔ ∀ i j, a ≤ f i j := by
simp_rw [le_iInf_iff]
#align le_infi₂_iff le_iInf₂_iff
theorem iSup_lt_iff : iSup f < a ↔ ∃ b, b < a ∧ ∀ i, f i ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨iSup f, h, le_iSup f⟩, fun ⟨_, h, hb⟩ => (iSup_le hb).trans_lt h⟩
#align supr_lt_iff iSup_lt_iff
theorem lt_iInf_iff : a < iInf f ↔ ∃ b, a < b ∧ ∀ i, b ≤ f i :=
⟨fun h => ⟨iInf f, h, iInf_le f⟩, fun ⟨_, h, hb⟩ => h.trans_le <| le_iInf hb⟩
#align lt_infi_iff lt_iInf_iff
theorem sSup_eq_iSup {s : Set α} : sSup s = ⨆ a ∈ s, a :=
le_antisymm (sSup_le le_iSup₂) (iSup₂_le fun _ => le_sSup)
#align Sup_eq_supr sSup_eq_iSup
theorem sInf_eq_iInf {s : Set α} : sInf s = ⨅ a ∈ s, a :=
@sSup_eq_iSup αᵒᵈ _ _
#align Inf_eq_infi sInf_eq_iInf
theorem Monotone.le_map_iSup [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) :
⨆ i, f (s i) ≤ f (iSup s) :=
iSup_le fun _ => hf <| le_iSup _ _
#align monotone.le_map_supr Monotone.le_map_iSup
theorem Antitone.le_map_iInf [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) :
⨆ i, f (s i) ≤ f (iInf s) :=
hf.dual_left.le_map_iSup
#align antitone.le_map_infi Antitone.le_map_iInf
theorem Monotone.le_map_iSup₂ [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
⨆ (i) (j), f (s i j) ≤ f (⨆ (i) (j), s i j) :=
iSup₂_le fun _ _ => hf <| le_iSup₂ _ _
#align monotone.le_map_supr₂ Monotone.le_map_iSup₂
theorem Antitone.le_map_iInf₂ [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
⨆ (i) (j), f (s i j) ≤ f (⨅ (i) (j), s i j) :=
hf.dual_left.le_map_iSup₂ _
#align antitone.le_map_infi₂ Antitone.le_map_iInf₂
theorem Monotone.le_map_sSup [CompleteLattice β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) :
⨆ a ∈ s, f a ≤ f (sSup s) := by rw [sSup_eq_iSup]; exact hf.le_map_iSup₂ _
#align monotone.le_map_Sup Monotone.le_map_sSup
theorem Antitone.le_map_sInf [CompleteLattice β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) :
⨆ a ∈ s, f a ≤ f (sInf s) :=
hf.dual_left.le_map_sSup
#align antitone.le_map_Inf Antitone.le_map_sInf
theorem OrderIso.map_iSup [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (x : ι → α) :
f (⨆ i, x i) = ⨆ i, f (x i) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff <| f.surjective.forall.2
fun x => by simp only [f.le_iff_le, iSup_le_iff]
#align order_iso.map_supr OrderIso.map_iSup
theorem OrderIso.map_iInf [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (x : ι → α) :
f (⨅ i, x i) = ⨅ i, f (x i) :=
OrderIso.map_iSup f.dual _
#align order_iso.map_infi OrderIso.map_iInf
theorem OrderIso.map_sSup [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (s : Set α) :
f (sSup s) = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a := by
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup, OrderIso.map_iSup]
#align order_iso.map_Sup OrderIso.map_sSup
theorem OrderIso.map_sInf [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (s : Set α) :
f (sInf s) = ⨅ a ∈ s, f a :=
OrderIso.map_sSup f.dual _
#align order_iso.map_Inf OrderIso.map_sInf
theorem iSup_comp_le {ι' : Sort*} (f : ι' → α) (g : ι → ι') : ⨆ x, f (g x) ≤ ⨆ y, f y :=
iSup_mono' fun _ => ⟨_, le_rfl⟩
#align supr_comp_le iSup_comp_le
theorem le_iInf_comp {ι' : Sort*} (f : ι' → α) (g : ι → ι') : ⨅ y, f y ≤ ⨅ x, f (g x) :=
iInf_mono' fun _ => ⟨_, le_rfl⟩
#align le_infi_comp le_iInf_comp
theorem Monotone.iSup_comp_eq [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) {s : ι → β}
(hs : ∀ x, ∃ i, x ≤ s i) : ⨆ x, f (s x) = ⨆ y, f y :=
le_antisymm (iSup_comp_le _ _) (iSup_mono' fun x => (hs x).imp fun _ hi => hf hi)
#align monotone.supr_comp_eq Monotone.iSup_comp_eq
theorem Monotone.iInf_comp_eq [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) {s : ι → β}
(hs : ∀ x, ∃ i, s i ≤ x) : ⨅ x, f (s x) = ⨅ y, f y :=
le_antisymm (iInf_mono' fun x => (hs x).imp fun _ hi => hf hi) (le_iInf_comp _ _)
#align monotone.infi_comp_eq Monotone.iInf_comp_eq
theorem Antitone.map_iSup_le [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) :
f (iSup s) ≤ ⨅ i, f (s i) :=
le_iInf fun _ => hf <| le_iSup _ _
#align antitone.map_supr_le Antitone.map_iSup_le
theorem Monotone.map_iInf_le [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) :
f (iInf s) ≤ ⨅ i, f (s i) :=
hf.dual_left.map_iSup_le
#align monotone.map_infi_le Monotone.map_iInf_le
theorem Antitone.map_iSup₂_le [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
f (⨆ (i) (j), s i j) ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), f (s i j) :=
hf.dual.le_map_iInf₂ _
#align antitone.map_supr₂_le Antitone.map_iSup₂_le
theorem Monotone.map_iInf₂_le [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
f (⨅ (i) (j), s i j) ≤ ⨅ (i) (j), f (s i j) :=
hf.dual.le_map_iSup₂ _
#align monotone.map_infi₂_le Monotone.map_iInf₂_le
theorem Antitone.map_sSup_le [CompleteLattice β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : Antitone f) :
f (sSup s) ≤ ⨅ a ∈ s, f a := by
rw [sSup_eq_iSup]
exact hf.map_iSup₂_le _
#align antitone.map_Sup_le Antitone.map_sSup_le
theorem Monotone.map_sInf_le [CompleteLattice β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) :
f (sInf s) ≤ ⨅ a ∈ s, f a :=
hf.dual_left.map_sSup_le
#align monotone.map_Inf_le Monotone.map_sInf_le
theorem iSup_const_le : ⨆ _ : ι, a ≤ a :=
iSup_le fun _ => le_rfl
#align supr_const_le iSup_const_le
theorem le_iInf_const : a ≤ ⨅ _ : ι, a :=
le_iInf fun _ => le_rfl
#align le_infi_const le_iInf_const
-- We generalize this to conditionally complete lattices in `ciSup_const` and `ciInf_const`.
theorem iSup_const [Nonempty ι] : ⨆ _ : ι, a = a := by rw [iSup, range_const, sSup_singleton]
#align supr_const iSup_const
theorem iInf_const [Nonempty ι] : ⨅ _ : ι, a = a :=
@iSup_const αᵒᵈ _ _ a _
#align infi_const iInf_const
@[simp]
theorem iSup_bot : (⨆ _ : ι, ⊥ : α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique iSup_const_le
#align supr_bot iSup_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInf_top : (⨅ _ : ι, ⊤ : α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique le_iInf_const
#align infi_top iInf_top
@[simp]
theorem iSup_eq_bot : iSup s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ⊥ :=
sSup_eq_bot.trans forall_mem_range
#align supr_eq_bot iSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInf_eq_top : iInf s = ⊤ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ⊤ :=
sInf_eq_top.trans forall_mem_range
#align infi_eq_top iInf_eq_top
theorem iSup₂_eq_bot {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} : ⨆ (i) (j), f i j = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i j, f i j = ⊥ := by
simp
#align supr₂_eq_bot iSup₂_eq_bot
theorem iInf₂_eq_top {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} : ⨅ (i) (j), f i j = ⊤ ↔ ∀ i j, f i j = ⊤ := by
simp
#align infi₂_eq_top iInf₂_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem iSup_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : ⨆ h : p, f h = f hp :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun _ => le_rfl) (le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_pos iSup_pos
@[simp]
theorem iInf_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : p) : ⨅ h : p, f h = f hp :=
le_antisymm (iInf_le _ _) (le_iInf fun _ => le_rfl)
#align infi_pos iInf_pos
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬p) : ⨆ h : p, f h = ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun h => (hp h).elim) bot_le
#align supr_neg iSup_neg
@[simp]
theorem iInf_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → α} (hp : ¬p) : ⨅ h : p, f h = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top <| le_iInf fun h => (hp h).elim
#align infi_neg iInf_neg
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `f`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than `f i` for all `i`, and that this is not the case of any `w<b`.
See `ciSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt {f : ι → α} (h₁ : ∀ i, f i ≤ b)
(h₂ : ∀ w, w < b → ∃ i, w < f i) : ⨆ i : ι, f i = b :=
sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (forall_mem_range.mpr h₁) fun w hw =>
exists_range_iff.mpr <| h₂ w hw
#align supr_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `f`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than `f i` for all `i`, and that this is not the case of any `w>b`.
See `ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in conditionally complete
lattices. -/
theorem iInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt :
(∀ i, b ≤ f i) → (∀ w, b < w → ∃ i, f i < w) → ⨅ i, f i = b :=
@iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt iInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
theorem iSup_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (a : p → α) :
⨆ h : p, a h = if h : p then a h else ⊥ := by by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
#align supr_eq_dif iSup_eq_dif
theorem iSup_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (a : α) : ⨆ _ : p, a = if p then a else ⊥ :=
iSup_eq_dif fun _ => a
#align supr_eq_if iSup_eq_if
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (a : p → α) :
⨅ h : p, a h = if h : p then a h else ⊤ :=
@iSup_eq_dif αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_eq_dif iInf_eq_dif
theorem iInf_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (a : α) : ⨅ _ : p, a = if p then a else ⊤ :=
iInf_eq_dif fun _ => a
#align infi_eq_if iInf_eq_if
theorem iSup_comm {f : ι → ι' → α} : ⨆ (i) (j), f i j = ⨆ (j) (i), f i j :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun i => iSup_mono fun j => le_iSup (fun i => f i j) i)
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_mono fun _ => le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_comm iSup_comm
theorem iInf_comm {f : ι → ι' → α} : ⨅ (i) (j), f i j = ⨅ (j) (i), f i j :=
@iSup_comm αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_comm iInf_comm
theorem iSup₂_comm {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
(f : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → α) :
⨆ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⨆ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := by
simp only [@iSup_comm _ (κ₁ _), @iSup_comm _ ι₁]
#align supr₂_comm iSup₂_comm
theorem iInf₂_comm {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
(f : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → α) :
⨅ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⨅ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := by
simp only [@iInf_comm _ (κ₁ _), @iInf_comm _ ι₁]
#align infi₂_comm iInf₂_comm
/- TODO: this is strange. In the proof below, we get exactly the desired
among the equalities, but close does not get it.
begin
apply @le_antisymm,
simp, intros,
begin [smt]
ematch, ematch, ematch, trace_state, have := le_refl (f i_1 i),
trace_state, close
end
end
-/
@[simp]
theorem iSup_iSup_eq_left {b : β} {f : ∀ x : β, x = b → α} : ⨆ x, ⨆ h : x = b, f x h = f b rfl :=
(@le_iSup₂ _ _ _ _ f b rfl).antisymm'
(iSup_le fun c =>
iSup_le <| by
rintro rfl
rfl)
#align supr_supr_eq_left iSup_iSup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInf_iInf_eq_left {b : β} {f : ∀ x : β, x = b → α} : ⨅ x, ⨅ h : x = b, f x h = f b rfl :=
@iSup_iSup_eq_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_infi_eq_left iInf_iInf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iSup_iSup_eq_right {b : β} {f : ∀ x : β, b = x → α} : ⨆ x, ⨆ h : b = x, f x h = f b rfl :=
(le_iSup₂ b rfl).antisymm'
(iSup₂_le fun c => by
rintro rfl
rfl)
#align supr_supr_eq_right iSup_iSup_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iInf_iInf_eq_right {b : β} {f : ∀ x : β, b = x → α} : ⨅ x, ⨅ h : b = x, f x h = f b rfl :=
@iSup_iSup_eq_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_infi_eq_right iInf_iInf_eq_right
theorem iSup_subtype {p : ι → Prop} {f : Subtype p → α} : iSup f = ⨆ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun ⟨i, h⟩ => @le_iSup₂ _ _ p _ (fun i h => f ⟨i, h⟩) i h)
(iSup₂_le fun _ _ => le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_subtype iSup_subtype
theorem iInf_subtype : ∀ {p : ι → Prop} {f : Subtype p → α}, iInf f = ⨅ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
@iSup_subtype αᵒᵈ _ _
#align infi_subtype iInf_subtype
theorem iSup_subtype' {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} :
⨆ (i) (h), f i h = ⨆ x : Subtype p, f x x.property :=
(@iSup_subtype _ _ _ p fun x => f x.val x.property).symm
#align supr_subtype' iSup_subtype'
theorem iInf_subtype' {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} :
⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h = ⨅ x : Subtype p, f x x.property :=
(@iInf_subtype _ _ _ p fun x => f x.val x.property).symm
#align infi_subtype' iInf_subtype'
theorem iSup_subtype'' {ι} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → α) : ⨆ i : s, f i = ⨆ (t : ι) (_ : t ∈ s), f t :=
iSup_subtype
#align supr_subtype'' iSup_subtype''
theorem iInf_subtype'' {ι} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → α) : ⨅ i : s, f i = ⨅ (t : ι) (_ : t ∈ s), f t :=
iInf_subtype
#align infi_subtype'' iInf_subtype''
theorem biSup_const {ι : Sort _} {a : α} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ⨆ i ∈ s, a = a := by
haveI : Nonempty s := Set.nonempty_coe_sort.mpr hs
rw [← iSup_subtype'', iSup_const]
#align bsupr_const biSup_const
theorem biInf_const {ι : Sort _} {a : α} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ⨅ i ∈ s, a = a :=
@biSup_const αᵒᵈ _ ι _ s hs
#align binfi_const biInf_const
theorem iSup_sup_eq : ⨆ x, f x ⊔ g x = (⨆ x, f x) ⊔ ⨆ x, g x :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun _ => sup_le_sup (le_iSup _ _) <| le_iSup _ _)
(sup_le (iSup_mono fun _ => le_sup_left) <| iSup_mono fun _ => le_sup_right)
#align supr_sup_eq iSup_sup_eq
theorem iInf_inf_eq : ⨅ x, f x ⊓ g x = (⨅ x, f x) ⊓ ⨅ x, g x :=
@iSup_sup_eq αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_inf_eq iInf_inf_eq
lemma Equiv.biSup_comp {ι ι' : Type*} {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') (s : Set ι') :
⨆ i ∈ e.symm '' s, g (e i) = ⨆ i ∈ s, g i := by
simpa only [iSup_subtype'] using (image e.symm s).symm.iSup_comp (g := g ∘ (↑))
lemma Equiv.biInf_comp {ι ι' : Type*} {g : ι' → α} (e : ι ≃ ι') (s : Set ι') :
⨅ i ∈ e.symm '' s, g (e i) = ⨅ i ∈ s, g i :=
e.biSup_comp s (α := αᵒᵈ)
lemma biInf_le {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (f : ι → α) {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
⨅ i ∈ s, f i ≤ f i := by
simpa only [iInf_subtype'] using iInf_le (ι := s) (f := f ∘ (↑)) ⟨i, hi⟩
lemma le_biSup {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (f : ι → α) {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
f i ≤ ⨆ i ∈ s, f i :=
biInf_le (α := αᵒᵈ) f hi
/- TODO: here is another example where more flexible pattern matching
might help.
begin
apply @le_antisymm,
safe, pose h := f a ⊓ g a, begin [smt] ematch, ematch end
end
-/
theorem iSup_sup [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (⨆ x, f x) ⊔ a = ⨆ x, f x ⊔ a := by
rw [iSup_sup_eq, iSup_const]
#align supr_sup iSup_sup
theorem iInf_inf [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (⨅ x, f x) ⊓ a = ⨅ x, f x ⊓ a := by
rw [iInf_inf_eq, iInf_const]
#align infi_inf iInf_inf
theorem sup_iSup [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (a ⊔ ⨆ x, f x) = ⨆ x, a ⊔ f x := by
rw [iSup_sup_eq, iSup_const]
#align sup_supr sup_iSup
theorem inf_iInf [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → α} {a : α} : (a ⊓ ⨅ x, f x) = ⨅ x, a ⊓ f x := by
rw [iInf_inf_eq, iInf_const]
#align inf_infi inf_iInf
theorem biSup_sup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(⨆ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ⊔ a = ⨆ (i) (h : p i), f i h ⊔ a := by
haveI : Nonempty { i // p i } :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h
⟨⟨i, hi⟩⟩
rw [iSup_subtype', iSup_subtype', iSup_sup]
#align bsupr_sup biSup_sup
theorem sup_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(a ⊔ ⨆ (i) (h : p i), f i h) = ⨆ (i) (h : p i), a ⊔ f i h := by
simpa only [sup_comm] using @biSup_sup α _ _ p _ _ h
#align sup_bsupr sup_biSup
theorem biInf_inf {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ⊓ a = ⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h ⊓ a :=
@biSup_sup αᵒᵈ ι _ p f _ h
#align binfi_inf biInf_inf
theorem inf_biInf {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} {a : α} (h : ∃ i, p i) :
(a ⊓ ⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h) = ⨅ (i) (h : p i), a ⊓ f i h :=
@sup_biSup αᵒᵈ ι _ p f _ h
#align inf_binfi inf_biInf
/-! ### `iSup` and `iInf` under `Prop` -/
theorem iSup_false {s : False → α} : iSup s = ⊥ := by simp
#align supr_false iSup_false
theorem iInf_false {s : False → α} : iInf s = ⊤ := by simp
#align infi_false iInf_false
theorem iSup_true {s : True → α} : iSup s = s trivial :=
iSup_pos trivial
#align supr_true iSup_true
theorem iInf_true {s : True → α} : iInf s = s trivial :=
iInf_pos trivial
#align infi_true iInf_true
@[simp]
theorem iSup_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → α} : ⨆ x, f x = ⨆ (i) (h), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun ⟨i, h⟩ => @le_iSup₂ _ _ _ _ (fun _ _ => _) i h)
(iSup₂_le fun _ _ => le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_exists iSup_exists
@[simp]
theorem iInf_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → α} : ⨅ x, f x = ⨅ (i) (h), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
@iSup_exists αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_exists iInf_exists
theorem iSup_and {p q : Prop} {s : p ∧ q → α} : iSup s = ⨆ (h₁) (h₂), s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le fun ⟨i, h⟩ => @le_iSup₂ _ _ _ _ (fun _ _ => _) i h)
(iSup₂_le fun _ _ => le_iSup _ _)
#align supr_and iSup_and
theorem iInf_and {p q : Prop} {s : p ∧ q → α} : iInf s = ⨅ (h₁) (h₂), s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ :=
@iSup_and αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_and iInf_and
/-- The symmetric case of `iSup_and`, useful for rewriting into a supremum over a conjunction -/
theorem iSup_and' {p q : Prop} {s : p → q → α} :
⨆ (h₁ : p) (h₂ : q), s h₁ h₂ = ⨆ h : p ∧ q, s h.1 h.2 :=
Eq.symm iSup_and
#align supr_and' iSup_and'
/-- The symmetric case of `iInf_and`, useful for rewriting into an infimum over a conjunction -/
theorem iInf_and' {p q : Prop} {s : p → q → α} :
⨅ (h₁ : p) (h₂ : q), s h₁ h₂ = ⨅ h : p ∧ q, s h.1 h.2 :=
Eq.symm iInf_and
#align infi_and' iInf_and'
theorem iSup_or {p q : Prop} {s : p ∨ q → α} :
⨆ x, s x = (⨆ i, s (Or.inl i)) ⊔ ⨆ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
le_antisymm
(iSup_le fun i =>
match i with
| Or.inl _ => le_sup_of_le_left <| le_iSup (fun _ => s _) _
| Or.inr _ => le_sup_of_le_right <| le_iSup (fun _ => s _) _)
(sup_le (iSup_comp_le _ _) (iSup_comp_le _ _))
#align supr_or iSup_or
theorem iInf_or {p q : Prop} {s : p ∨ q → α} :
⨅ x, s x = (⨅ i, s (Or.inl i)) ⊓ ⨅ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
@iSup_or αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_or iInf_or
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iSup_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → α) :
⨆ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⨆ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ⊔ ⨆ (i) (h : ¬p i),
g i h := by
rw [← iSup_sup_eq]
congr 1 with i
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align supr_dite iSup_dite
theorem iInf_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → α) :
⨅ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⨅ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ⊓ ⨅ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite p (show ∀ i, p i → αᵒᵈ from f) g
#align infi_dite iInf_dite
theorem iSup_ite (f g : ι → α) :
⨆ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ⊔ ⨆ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
#align supr_ite iSup_ite
theorem iInf_ite (f g : ι → α) :
⨅ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ⊓ ⨅ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
#align infi_ite iInf_ite
end
theorem iSup_range {g : β → α} {f : ι → β} : ⨆ b ∈ range f, g b = ⨆ i, g (f i) := by
rw [← iSup_subtype'', iSup_range']
#align supr_range iSup_range
theorem iInf_range : ∀ {g : β → α} {f : ι → β}, ⨅ b ∈ range f, g b = ⨅ i, g (f i) :=
@iSup_range αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align infi_range iInf_range
theorem sSup_image {s : Set β} {f : β → α} : sSup (f '' s) = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a := by
rw [← iSup_subtype'', sSup_image']
#align Sup_image sSup_image
theorem sInf_image {s : Set β} {f : β → α} : sInf (f '' s) = ⨅ a ∈ s, f a :=
@sSup_image αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align Inf_image sInf_image
theorem OrderIso.map_sSup_eq_sSup_symm_preimage [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (s : Set α) :
f (sSup s) = sSup (f.symm ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [map_sSup, ← sSup_image, f.image_eq_preimage]
theorem OrderIso.map_sInf_eq_sInf_symm_preimage [CompleteLattice β] (f : α ≃o β) (s : Set α) :
f (sInf s) = sInf (f.symm ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [map_sInf, ← sInf_image, f.image_eq_preimage]
/-
### iSup and iInf under set constructions
-/
theorem iSup_emptyset {f : β → α} : ⨆ x ∈ (∅ : Set β), f x = ⊥ := by simp
#align supr_emptyset iSup_emptyset
theorem iInf_emptyset {f : β → α} : ⨅ x ∈ (∅ : Set β), f x = ⊤ := by simp
#align infi_emptyset iInf_emptyset
theorem iSup_univ {f : β → α} : ⨆ x ∈ (univ : Set β), f x = ⨆ x, f x := by simp
#align supr_univ iSup_univ
theorem iInf_univ {f : β → α} : ⨅ x ∈ (univ : Set β), f x = ⨅ x, f x := by simp
#align infi_univ iInf_univ
theorem iSup_union {f : β → α} {s t : Set β} :
⨆ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x = (⨆ x ∈ s, f x) ⊔ ⨆ x ∈ t, f x := by
simp_rw [mem_union, iSup_or, iSup_sup_eq]
#align supr_union iSup_union
theorem iInf_union {f : β → α} {s t : Set β} : ⨅ x ∈ s ∪ t, f x = (⨅ x ∈ s, f x) ⊓ ⨅ x ∈ t, f x :=
@iSup_union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
#align infi_union iInf_union
theorem iSup_split (f : β → α) (p : β → Prop) :
⨆ i, f i = (⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ⊔ ⨆ (i) (_ : ¬p i), f i := by
simpa [Classical.em] using @iSup_union _ _ _ f { i | p i } { i | ¬p i }
#align supr_split iSup_split
theorem iInf_split :
∀ (f : β → α) (p : β → Prop), ⨅ i, f i = (⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ⊓ ⨅ (i) (_ : ¬p i), f i :=
@iSup_split αᵒᵈ _ _
#align infi_split iInf_split
theorem iSup_split_single (f : β → α) (i₀ : β) : ⨆ i, f i = f i₀ ⊔ ⨆ (i) (_ : i ≠ i₀), f i := by
convert iSup_split f (fun i => i = i₀)
simp
#align supr_split_single iSup_split_single
theorem iInf_split_single (f : β → α) (i₀ : β) : ⨅ i, f i = f i₀ ⊓ ⨅ (i) (_ : i ≠ i₀), f i :=
@iSup_split_single αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align infi_split_single iInf_split_single
theorem iSup_le_iSup_of_subset {f : β → α} {s t : Set β} : s ⊆ t → ⨆ x ∈ s, f x ≤ ⨆ x ∈ t, f x :=
biSup_mono
#align supr_le_supr_of_subset iSup_le_iSup_of_subset
theorem iInf_le_iInf_of_subset {f : β → α} {s t : Set β} : s ⊆ t → ⨅ x ∈ t, f x ≤ ⨅ x ∈ s, f x :=
biInf_mono
#align infi_le_infi_of_subset iInf_le_iInf_of_subset
theorem iSup_insert {f : β → α} {s : Set β} {b : β} :
⨆ x ∈ insert b s, f x = f b ⊔ ⨆ x ∈ s, f x :=
Eq.trans iSup_union <| congr_arg (fun x => x ⊔ ⨆ x ∈ s, f x) iSup_iSup_eq_left
#align supr_insert iSup_insert
theorem iInf_insert {f : β → α} {s : Set β} {b : β} :
⨅ x ∈ insert b s, f x = f b ⊓ ⨅ x ∈ s, f x :=
Eq.trans iInf_union <| congr_arg (fun x => x ⊓ ⨅ x ∈ s, f x) iInf_iInf_eq_left
#align infi_insert iInf_insert
theorem iSup_singleton {f : β → α} {b : β} : ⨆ x ∈ (singleton b : Set β), f x = f b := by simp
#align supr_singleton iSup_singleton
theorem iInf_singleton {f : β → α} {b : β} : ⨅ x ∈ (singleton b : Set β), f x = f b := by simp
#align infi_singleton iInf_singleton
theorem iSup_pair {f : β → α} {a b : β} : ⨆ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set β), f x = f a ⊔ f b := by
rw [iSup_insert, iSup_singleton]
#align supr_pair iSup_pair
theorem iInf_pair {f : β → α} {a b : β} : ⨅ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set β), f x = f a ⊓ f b := by
rw [iInf_insert, iInf_singleton]
#align infi_pair iInf_pair
theorem iSup_image {γ} {f : β → γ} {g : γ → α} {t : Set β} :
⨆ c ∈ f '' t, g c = ⨆ b ∈ t, g (f b) := by rw [← sSup_image, ← sSup_image, ← image_comp]; rfl
#align supr_image iSup_image
theorem iInf_image :
∀ {γ} {f : β → γ} {g : γ → α} {t : Set β}, ⨅ c ∈ f '' t, g c = ⨅ b ∈ t, g (f b) :=
@iSup_image αᵒᵈ _ _
#align infi_image iInf_image
theorem iSup_extend_bot {e : ι → β} (he : Injective e) (f : ι → α) :
⨆ j, extend e f ⊥ j = ⨆ i, f i := by
rw [iSup_split _ fun j => ∃ i, e i = j]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [he.extend_apply, extend_apply', @iSup_comm _ β ι]
#align supr_extend_bot iSup_extend_bot
theorem iInf_extend_top {e : ι → β} (he : Injective e) (f : ι → α) :
⨅ j, extend e f ⊤ j = iInf f :=
@iSup_extend_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ he _
#align infi_extend_top iInf_extend_top
/-!
### `iSup` and `iInf` under `Type`
-/
theorem iSup_of_empty' {α ι} [SupSet α] [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : iSup f = sSup (∅ : Set α) :=
congr_arg sSup (range_eq_empty f)
#align supr_of_empty' iSup_of_empty'
theorem iInf_of_isEmpty {α ι} [InfSet α] [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : iInf f = sInf (∅ : Set α) :=
congr_arg sInf (range_eq_empty f)
#align infi_of_empty' iInf_of_isEmpty
theorem iSup_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : iSup f = ⊥ :=
(iSup_of_empty' f).trans sSup_empty
#align supr_of_empty iSup_of_empty
theorem iInf_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : iInf f = ⊤ :=
@iSup_of_empty αᵒᵈ _ _ _ f
#align infi_of_empty iInf_of_empty
| Mathlib/Order/CompleteLattice.lean | 1,480 | 1,481 | theorem iSup_bool_eq {f : Bool → α} : ⨆ b : Bool, f b = f true ⊔ f false := by |
rw [iSup, Bool.range_eq, sSup_pair, sup_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Subalgebra
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian
#align_import algebra.lie.submodule from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9822b65bfc4ac74537d77ae318d27df1df662471"
/-!
# Lie submodules of a Lie algebra
In this file we define Lie submodules and Lie ideals, we construct the lattice structure on Lie
submodules and we use it to define various important operations, notably the Lie span of a subset
of a Lie module.
## Main definitions
* `LieSubmodule`
* `LieSubmodule.wellFounded_of_noetherian`
* `LieSubmodule.lieSpan`
* `LieSubmodule.map`
* `LieSubmodule.comap`
* `LieIdeal`
* `LieIdeal.map`
* `LieIdeal.comap`
## Tags
lie algebra, lie submodule, lie ideal, lattice structure
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section LieSubmodule
variable (R : Type u) (L : Type v) (M : Type w)
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
/-- A Lie submodule of a Lie module is a submodule that is closed under the Lie bracket.
This is a sufficient condition for the subset itself to form a Lie module. -/
structure LieSubmodule extends Submodule R M where
lie_mem : ∀ {x : L} {m : M}, m ∈ carrier → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ carrier
#align lie_submodule LieSubmodule
attribute [nolint docBlame] LieSubmodule.toSubmodule
attribute [coe] LieSubmodule.toSubmodule
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R L M}
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M)
instance : SetLike (LieSubmodule R L M) M where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' N O h := by cases N; cases O; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective' h
instance : AddSubgroupClass (LieSubmodule R L M) M where
add_mem {N} _ _ := N.add_mem'
zero_mem N := N.zero_mem'
neg_mem {N} x hx := show -x ∈ N.toSubmodule from neg_mem hx
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (LieSubmodule R L M) R M where
smul_mem {s} c _ h := s.smul_mem' c h
/-- The zero module is a Lie submodule of any Lie module. -/
instance : Zero (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨{ (0 : Submodule R M) with
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by rw [(Submodule.mem_bot R).1 h]; apply lie_zero }⟩
instance : Inhabited (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨0⟩
instance coeSubmodule : CoeOut (LieSubmodule R L M) (Submodule R M) :=
⟨toSubmodule⟩
#align lie_submodule.coe_submodule LieSubmodule.coeSubmodule
-- Syntactic tautology
#noalign lie_submodule.to_submodule_eq_coe
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_toSubmodule : ((N : Submodule R M) : Set M) = N :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this after `mem_coeSubmodule` is added to the simp set,
-- but `dsimp` can't.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_carrier {x : M} : x ∈ N.carrier ↔ x ∈ (N : Set M) :=
Iff.rfl
#align lie_submodule.mem_carrier LieSubmodule.mem_carrier
theorem mem_mk_iff (S : Set M) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) {x : M} :
x ∈ (⟨⟨⟨⟨S, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, h₄⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
#align lie_submodule.mem_mk_iff LieSubmodule.mem_mk_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff' (p : Submodule R M) (h) {x : M} :
x ∈ (⟨p, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_coeSubmodule {x : M} : x ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ↔ x ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
#align lie_submodule.mem_coe_submodule LieSubmodule.mem_coeSubmodule
theorem mem_coe {x : M} : x ∈ (N : Set M) ↔ x ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
#align lie_submodule.mem_coe LieSubmodule.mem_coe
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : M) ∈ N :=
zero_mem N
#align lie_submodule.zero_mem LieSubmodule.zero_mem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mk_eq_zero {x} (h : x ∈ N) : (⟨x, h⟩ : N) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
Subtype.ext_iff_val
#align lie_submodule.mk_eq_zero LieSubmodule.mk_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSet_mk (S : Set M) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) :
((⟨⟨⟨⟨S, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, h₄⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = S :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.coe_to_set_mk LieSubmodule.coe_toSet_mk
theorem coe_toSubmodule_mk (p : Submodule R M) (h) :
(({ p with lie_mem := h } : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = p := by cases p; rfl
#align lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_mk LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule_mk
theorem coeSubmodule_injective :
Function.Injective (toSubmodule : LieSubmodule R L M → Submodule R M) := fun x y h ↦ by
cases x; cases y; congr
#align lie_submodule.coe_submodule_injective LieSubmodule.coeSubmodule_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ m, m ∈ N ↔ m ∈ N') : N = N' :=
SetLike.ext h
#align lie_submodule.ext LieSubmodule.ext
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff : (N : Submodule R M) = (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ N = N' :=
coeSubmodule_injective.eq_iff
#align lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_eq_iff LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff
/-- Copy of a `LieSubmodule` with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑N) : LieSubmodule R L M where
carrier := s
-- Porting note: all the proofs below were in term mode
zero_mem' := by exact hs.symm ▸ N.zero_mem'
add_mem' x y := by rw [hs] at x y ⊢; exact N.add_mem' x y
smul_mem' := by exact hs.symm ▸ N.smul_mem'
lie_mem := by exact hs.symm ▸ N.lie_mem
#align lie_submodule.copy LieSubmodule.copy
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : LieSubmodule R L M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑S) : (S.copy s hs : Set M) = s :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.coe_copy LieSubmodule.coe_copy
theorem copy_eq (S : LieSubmodule R L M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align lie_submodule.copy_eq LieSubmodule.copy_eq
instance : LieRingModule L N where
bracket (x : L) (m : N) := ⟨⁅x, m.val⁆, N.lie_mem m.property⟩
add_lie := by intro x y m; apply SetCoe.ext; apply add_lie
lie_add := by intro x m n; apply SetCoe.ext; apply lie_add
leibniz_lie := by intro x y m; apply SetCoe.ext; apply leibniz_lie
instance module' {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [SMul S R] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] :
Module S N :=
N.toSubmodule.module'
#align lie_submodule.module' LieSubmodule.module'
instance : Module R N :=
N.toSubmodule.module
instance {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [SMul S R] [SMul Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [Module S M] [Module Sᵐᵒᵖ M]
[IsScalarTower S R M] [IsScalarTower Sᵐᵒᵖ R M] [IsCentralScalar S M] : IsCentralScalar S N :=
N.toSubmodule.isCentralScalar
instance instLieModule : LieModule R L N where
lie_smul := by intro t x y; apply SetCoe.ext; apply lie_smul
smul_lie := by intro t x y; apply SetCoe.ext; apply smul_lie
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : N) : M) = (0 : M) :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.coe_zero LieSubmodule.coe_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (m m' : N) : (↑(m + m') : M) = (m : M) + (m' : M) :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.coe_add LieSubmodule.coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (m : N) : (↑(-m) : M) = -(m : M) :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.coe_neg LieSubmodule.coe_neg
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (m m' : N) : (↑(m - m') : M) = (m : M) - (m' : M) :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.coe_sub LieSubmodule.coe_sub
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (t : R) (m : N) : (↑(t • m) : M) = t • (m : M) :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.coe_smul LieSubmodule.coe_smul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bracket (x : L) (m : N) : (↑⁅x, m⁆ : M) = ⁅x, ↑m⁆ :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.coe_bracket LieSubmodule.coe_bracket
instance [Subsingleton M] : Unique (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨⟨0⟩, fun _ ↦ (coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff _ _).mp (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
end LieSubmodule
section LieIdeal
/-- An ideal of a Lie algebra is a Lie submodule of the Lie algebra as a Lie module over itself. -/
abbrev LieIdeal :=
LieSubmodule R L L
#align lie_ideal LieIdeal
theorem lie_mem_right (I : LieIdeal R L) (x y : L) (h : y ∈ I) : ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ I :=
I.lie_mem h
#align lie_mem_right lie_mem_right
theorem lie_mem_left (I : LieIdeal R L) (x y : L) (h : x ∈ I) : ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ I := by
rw [← lie_skew, ← neg_lie]; apply lie_mem_right; assumption
#align lie_mem_left lie_mem_left
/-- An ideal of a Lie algebra is a Lie subalgebra. -/
def lieIdealSubalgebra (I : LieIdeal R L) : LieSubalgebra R L :=
{ I.toSubmodule with lie_mem' := by intro x y _ hy; apply lie_mem_right; exact hy }
#align lie_ideal_subalgebra lieIdealSubalgebra
instance : Coe (LieIdeal R L) (LieSubalgebra R L) :=
⟨lieIdealSubalgebra R L⟩
@[simp]
theorem LieIdeal.coe_toSubalgebra (I : LieIdeal R L) : ((I : LieSubalgebra R L) : Set L) = I :=
rfl
#align lie_ideal.coe_to_subalgebra LieIdeal.coe_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem LieIdeal.coe_to_lieSubalgebra_to_submodule (I : LieIdeal R L) :
((I : LieSubalgebra R L) : Submodule R L) = LieSubmodule.toSubmodule I :=
rfl
#align lie_ideal.coe_to_lie_subalgebra_to_submodule LieIdeal.coe_to_lieSubalgebra_to_submodule
/-- An ideal of `L` is a Lie subalgebra of `L`, so it is a Lie ring. -/
instance LieIdeal.lieRing (I : LieIdeal R L) : LieRing I :=
LieSubalgebra.lieRing R L ↑I
#align lie_ideal.lie_ring LieIdeal.lieRing
/-- Transfer the `LieAlgebra` instance from the coercion `LieIdeal → LieSubalgebra`. -/
instance LieIdeal.lieAlgebra (I : LieIdeal R L) : LieAlgebra R I :=
LieSubalgebra.lieAlgebra R L ↑I
#align lie_ideal.lie_algebra LieIdeal.lieAlgebra
/-- Transfer the `LieRingModule` instance from the coercion `LieIdeal → LieSubalgebra`. -/
instance LieIdeal.lieRingModule {R L : Type*} [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
(I : LieIdeal R L) [LieRingModule L M] : LieRingModule I M :=
LieSubalgebra.lieRingModule (I : LieSubalgebra R L)
#align lie_ideal.lie_ring_module LieIdeal.lieRingModule
@[simp]
theorem LieIdeal.coe_bracket_of_module {R L : Type*} [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
(I : LieIdeal R L) [LieRingModule L M] (x : I) (m : M) : ⁅x, m⁆ = ⁅(↑x : L), m⁆ :=
LieSubalgebra.coe_bracket_of_module (I : LieSubalgebra R L) x m
#align lie_ideal.coe_bracket_of_module LieIdeal.coe_bracket_of_module
/-- Transfer the `LieModule` instance from the coercion `LieIdeal → LieSubalgebra`. -/
instance LieIdeal.lieModule (I : LieIdeal R L) : LieModule R I M :=
LieSubalgebra.lieModule (I : LieSubalgebra R L)
#align lie_ideal.lie_module LieIdeal.lieModule
end LieIdeal
variable {R M}
theorem Submodule.exists_lieSubmodule_coe_eq_iff (p : Submodule R M) :
(∃ N : LieSubmodule R L M, ↑N = p) ↔ ∀ (x : L) (m : M), m ∈ p → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ p := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨N, rfl⟩ _ _; exact N.lie_mem
· intro h; use { p with lie_mem := @h }
#align submodule.exists_lie_submodule_coe_eq_iff Submodule.exists_lieSubmodule_coe_eq_iff
namespace LieSubalgebra
variable {L}
variable (K : LieSubalgebra R L)
/-- Given a Lie subalgebra `K ⊆ L`, if we view `L` as a `K`-module by restriction, it contains
a distinguished Lie submodule for the action of `K`, namely `K` itself. -/
def toLieSubmodule : LieSubmodule R K L :=
{ (K : Submodule R L) with lie_mem := fun {x _} hy ↦ K.lie_mem x.property hy }
#align lie_subalgebra.to_lie_submodule LieSubalgebra.toLieSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem coe_toLieSubmodule : (K.toLieSubmodule : Submodule R L) = K := rfl
#align lie_subalgebra.coe_to_lie_submodule LieSubalgebra.coe_toLieSubmodule
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem mem_toLieSubmodule (x : L) : x ∈ K.toLieSubmodule ↔ x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
#align lie_subalgebra.mem_to_lie_submodule LieSubalgebra.mem_toLieSubmodule
theorem exists_lieIdeal_coe_eq_iff :
(∃ I : LieIdeal R L, ↑I = K) ↔ ∀ x y : L, y ∈ K → ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ K := by
simp only [← coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, LieIdeal.coe_to_lieSubalgebra_to_submodule,
Submodule.exists_lieSubmodule_coe_eq_iff L]
exact Iff.rfl
#align lie_subalgebra.exists_lie_ideal_coe_eq_iff LieSubalgebra.exists_lieIdeal_coe_eq_iff
theorem exists_nested_lieIdeal_coe_eq_iff {K' : LieSubalgebra R L} (h : K ≤ K') :
(∃ I : LieIdeal R K', ↑I = ofLe h) ↔ ∀ x y : L, x ∈ K' → y ∈ K → ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ K := by
simp only [exists_lieIdeal_coe_eq_iff, coe_bracket, mem_ofLe]
constructor
· intro h' x y hx hy; exact h' ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, h hy⟩ hy
· rintro h' ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hy'; exact h' x y hx hy'
#align lie_subalgebra.exists_nested_lie_ideal_coe_eq_iff LieSubalgebra.exists_nested_lieIdeal_coe_eq_iff
end LieSubalgebra
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M) (I J : LieIdeal R L)
section LatticeStructure
open Set
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : LieSubmodule R L M → Set M) :=
SetLike.coe_injective
#align lie_submodule.coe_injective LieSubmodule.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeSubmodule_le_coeSubmodule : (N : Submodule R M) ≤ N' ↔ N ≤ N' :=
Iff.rfl
#align lie_submodule.coe_submodule_le_coe_submodule LieSubmodule.coeSubmodule_le_coeSubmodule
instance : Bot (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem bot_coe : ((⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = {0} :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.bot_coe LieSubmodule.bot_coe
@[simp]
theorem bot_coeSubmodule : ((⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.bot_coe_submodule LieSubmodule.bot_coeSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem coeSubmodule_eq_bot_iff : (N : Submodule R M) = ⊥ ↔ N = ⊥ := by
rw [← coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff, bot_coeSubmodule]
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_bot_iff {N : Submodule R M} {h} :
(⟨N, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) = ⊥ ↔ N = ⊥ := by
rw [← coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff, bot_coeSubmodule]
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot (x : M) : x ∈ (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x = 0 :=
mem_singleton_iff
#align lie_submodule.mem_bot LieSubmodule.mem_bot
instance : Top (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Submodule R M) with lie_mem := fun {x m} _ ↦ mem_univ ⁅x, m⁆ }⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_coe : ((⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = univ :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.top_coe LieSubmodule.top_coe
@[simp]
theorem top_coeSubmodule : ((⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.top_coe_submodule LieSubmodule.top_coeSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem coeSubmodule_eq_top_iff : (N : Submodule R M) = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊤ := by
rw [← coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff, top_coeSubmodule]
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_top_iff {N : Submodule R M} {h} :
(⟨N, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊤ := by
rw [← coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff, top_coeSubmodule]
@[simp]
theorem mem_top (x : M) : x ∈ (⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) :=
mem_univ x
#align lie_submodule.mem_top LieSubmodule.mem_top
instance : Inf (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun N N' ↦
{ (N ⊓ N' : Submodule R M) with
lie_mem := fun h ↦ mem_inter (N.lie_mem h.1) (N'.lie_mem h.2) }⟩
instance : InfSet (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun S ↦
{ toSubmodule := sInf {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S}
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by
simp only [Submodule.mem_carrier, mem_iInter, Submodule.sInf_coe, mem_setOf_eq,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, forall_exists_index, and_imp] at h ⊢
intro N hN; apply N.lie_mem (h N hN) }⟩
@[simp]
theorem inf_coe : (↑(N ⊓ N') : Set M) = ↑N ∩ ↑N' :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.inf_coe LieSubmodule.inf_coe
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem inf_coe_toSubmodule :
(↑(N ⊓ N') : Submodule R M) = (N : Submodule R M) ⊓ (N' : Submodule R M) :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.inf_coe_to_submodule LieSubmodule.inf_coe_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sInf_coe_toSubmodule (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sInf S) : Submodule R M) = sInf {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S} :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.Inf_coe_to_submodule LieSubmodule.sInf_coe_toSubmodule
theorem sInf_coe_toSubmodule' (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sInf S) : Submodule R M) = ⨅ N ∈ S, (N : Submodule R M) := by
rw [sInf_coe_toSubmodule, ← Set.image, sInf_image]
@[simp]
theorem iInf_coe_toSubmodule {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) :
(↑(⨅ i, p i) : Submodule R M) = ⨅ i, (p i : Submodule R M) := by
rw [iInf, sInf_coe_toSubmodule]; ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem sInf_coe (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set M) = ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : Set M) := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule, sInf_coe_toSubmodule, Submodule.sInf_coe]
ext m
simp only [mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, exists_imp,
and_imp, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_coeSubmodule]
#align lie_submodule.Inf_coe LieSubmodule.sInf_coe
@[simp]
theorem iInf_coe {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) : (↑(⨅ i, p i) : Set M) = ⋂ i, ↑(p i) := by
rw [iInf, sInf_coe]; simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iInter_exists, Set.iInter_iInter_eq']
@[simp]
theorem mem_iInf {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {x} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, p i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ p i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, iInf_coe, Set.mem_iInter]; rfl
instance : Sup (LieSubmodule R L M) where
sup N N' :=
{ toSubmodule := (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M)
lie_mem := by
rintro x m (hm : m ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M))
change ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M)
rw [Submodule.mem_sup] at hm ⊢
obtain ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩ := hm
exact ⟨⁅x, y⁆, N.lie_mem hy, ⁅x, z⁆, N'.lie_mem hz, (lie_add _ _ _).symm⟩ }
instance : SupSet (LieSubmodule R L M) where
sSup S :=
{ toSubmodule := sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S}
lie_mem := by
intro x m (hm : m ∈ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S})
change ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S}
obtain ⟨s, hs, hsm⟩ := Submodule.mem_sSup_iff_exists_finset.mp hm
clear hm
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with q t hqt ih generalizing m
· replace hsm : m = 0 := by simpa using hsm
simp [hsm]
· rw [Finset.iSup_insert] at hsm
obtain ⟨m', hm', u, hu, rfl⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.mp hsm
rw [lie_add]
refine add_mem ?_ (ih (Subset.trans (by simp) hs) hu)
obtain ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩ : ∃ p ∈ S, ↑p = q := hs (Finset.mem_insert_self q t)
suffices p ≤ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S} by exact this (p.lie_mem hm')
exact le_sSup ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩ }
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem sup_coe_toSubmodule :
(↑(N ⊔ N') : Submodule R M) = (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M) := by
rfl
#align lie_submodule.sup_coe_to_submodule LieSubmodule.sup_coe_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sSup_coe_toSubmodule (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sSup S) : Submodule R M) = sSup {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S} :=
rfl
theorem sSup_coe_toSubmodule' (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sSup S) : Submodule R M) = ⨆ N ∈ S, (N : Submodule R M) := by
rw [sSup_coe_toSubmodule, ← Set.image, sSup_image]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_coe_toSubmodule {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) :
(↑(⨆ i, p i) : Submodule R M) = ⨆ i, (p i : Submodule R M) := by
rw [iSup, sSup_coe_toSubmodule]; ext; simp [Submodule.mem_sSup, Submodule.mem_iSup]
/-- The set of Lie submodules of a Lie module form a complete lattice. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
{ coeSubmodule_injective.completeLattice toSubmodule sup_coe_toSubmodule inf_coe_toSubmodule
sSup_coe_toSubmodule' sInf_coe_toSubmodule' rfl rfl with
toPartialOrder := SetLike.instPartialOrder }
theorem mem_iSup_of_mem {ι} {b : M} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} (i : ι) (h : b ∈ N i) :
b ∈ ⨆ i, N i :=
(le_iSup N i) h
lemma iSup_induction {ι} (N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {C : M → Prop} {x : M}
(hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) (hN : ∀ i, ∀ y ∈ N i, C y) (h0 : C 0)
(hadd : ∀ y z, C y → C z → C (y + z)) : C x := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.mem_coeSubmodule, LieSubmodule.iSup_coe_toSubmodule] at hx
exact Submodule.iSup_induction (C := C) (fun i ↦ (N i : Submodule R M)) hx hN h0 hadd
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem iSup_induction' {ι} (N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {C : (x : M) → (x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) → Prop}
(hN : ∀ (i) (x) (hx : x ∈ N i), C x (mem_iSup_of_mem i hx)) (h0 : C 0 (zero_mem _))
(hadd : ∀ x y hx hy, C x hx → C y hy → C (x + y) (add_mem ‹_› ‹_›)) {x : M}
(hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) : C x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) (hc : C x hx) => hc
refine iSup_induction N (C := fun x : M ↦ ∃ (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i), C x hx) hx
(fun i x hx => ?_) ?_ fun x y => ?_
· exact ⟨_, hN _ _ hx⟩
· exact ⟨_, h0⟩
· rintro ⟨_, Cx⟩ ⟨_, Cy⟩
exact ⟨_, hadd _ _ _ _ Cx Cy⟩
theorem disjoint_iff_coe_toSubmodule :
Disjoint N N' ↔ Disjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) := by
rw [disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff, ← coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff, inf_coe_toSubmodule, bot_coeSubmodule,
← disjoint_iff]
theorem codisjoint_iff_coe_toSubmodule :
Codisjoint N N' ↔ Codisjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) := by
rw [codisjoint_iff, codisjoint_iff, ← coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff, sup_coe_toSubmodule,
top_coeSubmodule, ← codisjoint_iff]
theorem isCompl_iff_coe_toSubmodule :
IsCompl N N' ↔ IsCompl (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) := by
simp only [isCompl_iff, disjoint_iff_coe_toSubmodule, codisjoint_iff_coe_toSubmodule]
theorem independent_iff_coe_toSubmodule {ι : Type*} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} :
CompleteLattice.Independent N ↔ CompleteLattice.Independent fun i ↦ (N i : Submodule R M) := by
simp [CompleteLattice.independent_def, disjoint_iff_coe_toSubmodule]
theorem iSup_eq_top_iff_coe_toSubmodule {ι : Sort*} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} :
⨆ i, N i = ⊤ ↔ ⨆ i, (N i : Submodule R M) = ⊤ := by
rw [← iSup_coe_toSubmodule, ← top_coeSubmodule (L := L), coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff]
instance : Add (LieSubmodule R L M) where add := Sup.sup
instance : Zero (LieSubmodule R L M) where zero := ⊥
instance : AddCommMonoid (LieSubmodule R L M) where
add_assoc := sup_assoc
zero_add := bot_sup_eq
add_zero := sup_bot_eq
add_comm := sup_comm
nsmul := nsmulRec
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_sup : N + N' = N ⊔ N' :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.add_eq_sup LieSubmodule.add_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf (x : M) : x ∈ N ⊓ N' ↔ x ∈ N ∧ x ∈ N' := by
rw [← mem_coeSubmodule, ← mem_coeSubmodule, ← mem_coeSubmodule, inf_coe_toSubmodule,
Submodule.mem_inf]
#align lie_submodule.mem_inf LieSubmodule.mem_inf
theorem mem_sup (x : M) : x ∈ N ⊔ N' ↔ ∃ y ∈ N, ∃ z ∈ N', y + z = x := by
rw [← mem_coeSubmodule, sup_coe_toSubmodule, Submodule.mem_sup]; exact Iff.rfl
#align lie_submodule.mem_sup LieSubmodule.mem_sup
nonrec theorem eq_bot_iff : N = ⊥ ↔ ∀ m : M, m ∈ N → m = 0 := by rw [eq_bot_iff]; exact Iff.rfl
#align lie_submodule.eq_bot_iff LieSubmodule.eq_bot_iff
instance subsingleton_of_bot : Subsingleton (LieSubmodule R L ↑(⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)) := by
apply subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top
ext ⟨x, hx⟩; change x ∈ ⊥ at hx; rw [Submodule.mem_bot] at hx; subst hx
simp only [true_iff_iff, eq_self_iff_true, Submodule.mk_eq_zero, LieSubmodule.mem_bot, mem_top]
#align lie_submodule.subsingleton_of_bot LieSubmodule.subsingleton_of_bot
instance : IsModularLattice (LieSubmodule R L M) where
sup_inf_le_assoc_of_le _ _ := by
simp only [← coeSubmodule_le_coeSubmodule, sup_coe_toSubmodule, inf_coe_toSubmodule]
exact IsModularLattice.sup_inf_le_assoc_of_le _
variable (R L M)
/-- The natural functor that forgets the action of `L` as an order embedding. -/
@[simps] def toSubmodule_orderEmbedding : LieSubmodule R L M ↪o Submodule R M :=
{ toFun := (↑)
inj' := coeSubmodule_injective
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl }
theorem wellFounded_of_noetherian [IsNoetherian R M] :
WellFounded ((· > ·) : LieSubmodule R L M → LieSubmodule R L M → Prop) :=
RelHomClass.wellFounded (toSubmodule_orderEmbedding R L M).dual.ltEmbedding <|
isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded.mp inferInstance
#align lie_submodule.well_founded_of_noetherian LieSubmodule.wellFounded_of_noetherian
theorem wellFounded_of_isArtinian [IsArtinian R M] :
WellFounded ((· < ·) : LieSubmodule R L M → LieSubmodule R L M → Prop) :=
RelHomClass.wellFounded (toSubmodule_orderEmbedding R L M).ltEmbedding <|
IsArtinian.wellFounded_submodule_lt R M
instance [IsArtinian R M] : IsAtomic (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
isAtomic_of_orderBot_wellFounded_lt <| wellFounded_of_isArtinian R L M
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton (LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ Subsingleton M :=
have h : Subsingleton (LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ Subsingleton (Submodule R M) := by
rw [← subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, ← subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, ← coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff,
top_coeSubmodule, bot_coeSubmodule]
h.trans <| Submodule.subsingleton_iff R
#align lie_submodule.subsingleton_iff LieSubmodule.subsingleton_iff
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_iff : Nontrivial (LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ Nontrivial M :=
not_iff_not.mp
((not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.trans <| subsingleton_iff R L M).trans
not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.symm)
#align lie_submodule.nontrivial_iff LieSubmodule.nontrivial_iff
instance [Nontrivial M] : Nontrivial (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
(nontrivial_iff R L M).mpr ‹_›
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_bot {N : LieSubmodule R L M} : Nontrivial N ↔ N ≠ ⊥ := by
constructor <;> contrapose!
· rintro rfl
⟨⟨m₁, h₁ : m₁ ∈ (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)⟩, ⟨m₂, h₂ : m₂ ∈ (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)⟩, h₁₂⟩
simp [(LieSubmodule.mem_bot _).mp h₁, (LieSubmodule.mem_bot _).mp h₂] at h₁₂
· rw [not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, LieSubmodule.eq_bot_iff]
rintro ⟨h⟩ m hm
simpa using h ⟨m, hm⟩ ⟨_, N.zero_mem⟩
#align lie_submodule.nontrivial_iff_ne_bot LieSubmodule.nontrivial_iff_ne_bot
variable {R L M}
section InclusionMaps
/-- The inclusion of a Lie submodule into its ambient space is a morphism of Lie modules. -/
def incl : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M :=
{ Submodule.subtype (N : Submodule R M) with map_lie' := fun {_ _} ↦ rfl }
#align lie_submodule.incl LieSubmodule.incl
@[simp]
theorem incl_coe : (N.incl : N →ₗ[R] M) = (N : Submodule R M).subtype :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.incl_coe LieSubmodule.incl_coe
@[simp]
theorem incl_apply (m : N) : N.incl m = m :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.incl_apply LieSubmodule.incl_apply
theorem incl_eq_val : (N.incl : N → M) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.incl_eq_val LieSubmodule.incl_eq_val
theorem injective_incl : Function.Injective N.incl := Subtype.coe_injective
variable {N N'} (h : N ≤ N')
/-- Given two nested Lie submodules `N ⊆ N'`,
the inclusion `N ↪ N'` is a morphism of Lie modules. -/
def inclusion : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N' where
__ := Submodule.inclusion (show N.toSubmodule ≤ N'.toSubmodule from h)
map_lie' := rfl
#align lie_submodule.hom_of_le LieSubmodule.inclusion
@[simp]
theorem coe_inclusion (m : N) : (inclusion h m : M) = m :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.coe_hom_of_le LieSubmodule.coe_inclusion
theorem inclusion_apply (m : N) : inclusion h m = ⟨m.1, h m.2⟩ :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.hom_of_le_apply LieSubmodule.inclusion_apply
theorem inclusion_injective : Function.Injective (inclusion h) := fun x y ↦ by
simp only [inclusion_apply, imp_self, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, SetLike.coe_eq_coe]
#align lie_submodule.hom_of_le_injective LieSubmodule.inclusion_injective
end InclusionMaps
section LieSpan
variable (R L) (s : Set M)
/-- The `lieSpan` of a set `s ⊆ M` is the smallest Lie submodule of `M` that contains `s`. -/
def lieSpan : LieSubmodule R L M :=
sInf { N | s ⊆ N }
#align lie_submodule.lie_span LieSubmodule.lieSpan
variable {R L s}
theorem mem_lieSpan {x : M} : x ∈ lieSpan R L s ↔ ∀ N : LieSubmodule R L M, s ⊆ N → x ∈ N := by
change x ∈ (lieSpan R L s : Set M) ↔ _; erw [sInf_coe]; exact mem_iInter₂
#align lie_submodule.mem_lie_span LieSubmodule.mem_lieSpan
theorem subset_lieSpan : s ⊆ lieSpan R L s := by
intro m hm
erw [mem_lieSpan]
intro N hN
exact hN hm
#align lie_submodule.subset_lie_span LieSubmodule.subset_lieSpan
theorem submodule_span_le_lieSpan : Submodule.span R s ≤ lieSpan R L s := by
rw [Submodule.span_le]
apply subset_lieSpan
#align lie_submodule.submodule_span_le_lie_span LieSubmodule.submodule_span_le_lieSpan
@[simp]
theorem lieSpan_le {N} : lieSpan R L s ≤ N ↔ s ⊆ N := by
constructor
· exact Subset.trans subset_lieSpan
· intro hs m hm; rw [mem_lieSpan] at hm; exact hm _ hs
#align lie_submodule.lie_span_le LieSubmodule.lieSpan_le
theorem lieSpan_mono {t : Set M} (h : s ⊆ t) : lieSpan R L s ≤ lieSpan R L t := by
rw [lieSpan_le]
exact Subset.trans h subset_lieSpan
#align lie_submodule.lie_span_mono LieSubmodule.lieSpan_mono
theorem lieSpan_eq : lieSpan R L (N : Set M) = N :=
le_antisymm (lieSpan_le.mpr rfl.subset) subset_lieSpan
#align lie_submodule.lie_span_eq LieSubmodule.lieSpan_eq
theorem coe_lieSpan_submodule_eq_iff {p : Submodule R M} :
(lieSpan R L (p : Set M) : Submodule R M) = p ↔ ∃ N : LieSubmodule R L M, ↑N = p := by
rw [p.exists_lieSubmodule_coe_eq_iff L]; constructor <;> intro h
· intro x m hm; rw [← h, mem_coeSubmodule]; exact lie_mem _ (subset_lieSpan hm)
· rw [← coe_toSubmodule_mk p @h, coe_toSubmodule, coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff, lieSpan_eq]
#align lie_submodule.coe_lie_span_submodule_eq_iff LieSubmodule.coe_lieSpan_submodule_eq_iff
variable (R L M)
/-- `lieSpan` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion from `LieSubmodule` to `Set`. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (lieSpan R L : Set M → LieSubmodule R L M) (↑) where
choice s _ := lieSpan R L s
gc _ _ := lieSpan_le
le_l_u _ := subset_lieSpan
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
#align lie_submodule.gi LieSubmodule.gi
@[simp]
theorem span_empty : lieSpan R L (∅ : Set M) = ⊥ :=
(LieSubmodule.gi R L M).gc.l_bot
#align lie_submodule.span_empty LieSubmodule.span_empty
@[simp]
theorem span_univ : lieSpan R L (Set.univ : Set M) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 <| SetLike.le_def.2 <| subset_lieSpan
#align lie_submodule.span_univ LieSubmodule.span_univ
theorem lieSpan_eq_bot_iff : lieSpan R L s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ m ∈ s, m = (0 : M) := by
rw [_root_.eq_bot_iff, lieSpan_le, bot_coe, subset_singleton_iff]
#align lie_submodule.lie_span_eq_bot_iff LieSubmodule.lieSpan_eq_bot_iff
variable {M}
theorem span_union (s t : Set M) : lieSpan R L (s ∪ t) = lieSpan R L s ⊔ lieSpan R L t :=
(LieSubmodule.gi R L M).gc.l_sup
#align lie_submodule.span_union LieSubmodule.span_union
theorem span_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set M) : lieSpan R L (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, lieSpan R L (s i) :=
(LieSubmodule.gi R L M).gc.l_iSup
#align lie_submodule.span_Union LieSubmodule.span_iUnion
lemma isCompactElement_lieSpan_singleton (m : M) :
CompleteLattice.IsCompactElement (lieSpan R L {m}) := by
rw [CompleteLattice.isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le]
intro s hne hdir hsup
replace hsup : m ∈ (↑(sSup s) : Set M) := (SetLike.le_def.mp hsup) (subset_lieSpan rfl)
suffices (↑(sSup s) : Set M) = ⋃ N ∈ s, ↑N by
obtain ⟨N : LieSubmodule R L M, hN : N ∈ s, hN' : m ∈ N⟩ := by
simp_rw [this, Set.mem_iUnion, SetLike.mem_coe, exists_prop] at hsup; assumption
exact ⟨N, hN, by simpa⟩
replace hne : Nonempty s := Set.nonempty_coe_sort.mpr hne
have := Submodule.coe_iSup_of_directed _ hdir.directed_val
simp_rw [← iSup_coe_toSubmodule, Set.iUnion_coe_set, coe_toSubmodule] at this
rw [← this, SetLike.coe_set_eq, sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_subtype]
@[simp]
lemma sSup_image_lieSpan_singleton : sSup ((fun x ↦ lieSpan R L {x}) '' N) = N := by
refine le_antisymm (sSup_le <| by simp) ?_
simp_rw [← coeSubmodule_le_coeSubmodule, sSup_coe_toSubmodule, Set.mem_image, SetLike.mem_coe]
refine fun m hm ↦ Submodule.mem_sSup.mpr fun N' hN' ↦ ?_
replace hN' : ∀ m ∈ N, lieSpan R L {m} ≤ N' := by simpa using hN'
exact hN' _ hm (subset_lieSpan rfl)
instance instIsCompactlyGenerated : IsCompactlyGenerated (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun N ↦ ⟨(fun x ↦ lieSpan R L {x}) '' N, fun _ ⟨m, _, hm⟩ ↦
hm ▸ isCompactElement_lieSpan_singleton R L m, N.sSup_image_lieSpan_singleton⟩⟩
end LieSpan
end LatticeStructure
end LieSubmodule
section LieSubmoduleMapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {L' : Type w₂} {M : Type w} {M' : Type w₁}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L] [LieRing L'] [LieAlgebra R L']
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
variable [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M'] [LieRingModule L M'] [LieModule R L M']
namespace LieSubmodule
variable (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') (N N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M) (N' : LieSubmodule R L M')
/-- A morphism of Lie modules `f : M → M'` pushes forward Lie submodules of `M` to Lie submodules
of `M'`. -/
def map : LieSubmodule R L M' :=
{ (N : Submodule R M).map (f : M →ₗ[R] M') with
lie_mem := fun {x m'} h ↦ by
rcases h with ⟨m, hm, hfm⟩; use ⁅x, m⁆; constructor
· apply N.lie_mem hm
· norm_cast at hfm; simp [hfm] }
#align lie_submodule.map LieSubmodule.map
@[simp] theorem coe_map : (N.map f : Set M') = f '' N := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeSubmodule_map : (N.map f : Submodule R M') = (N : Submodule R M).map (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.coe_submodule_map LieSubmodule.coeSubmodule_map
/-- A morphism of Lie modules `f : M → M'` pulls back Lie submodules of `M'` to Lie submodules of
`M`. -/
def comap : LieSubmodule R L M :=
{ (N' : Submodule R M').comap (f : M →ₗ[R] M') with
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by
suffices ⁅x, f m⁆ ∈ N' by simp [this]
apply N'.lie_mem h }
#align lie_submodule.comap LieSubmodule.comap
@[simp]
theorem coeSubmodule_comap :
(N'.comap f : Submodule R M) = (N' : Submodule R M').comap (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.coe_submodule_comap LieSubmodule.coeSubmodule_comap
variable {f N N₂ N'}
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap : map f N ≤ N' ↔ N ≤ comap f N' :=
Set.image_subset_iff
#align lie_submodule.map_le_iff_le_comap LieSubmodule.map_le_iff_le_comap
variable (f)
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) := fun _ _ ↦ map_le_iff_le_comap
#align lie_submodule.gc_map_comap LieSubmodule.gc_map_comap
variable {f}
theorem map_inf_le : (N ⊓ N₂).map f ≤ N.map f ⊓ N₂.map f :=
Set.image_inter_subset f N N₂
theorem map_inf (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(N ⊓ N₂).map f = N.map f ⊓ N₂.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_inter hf
@[simp]
theorem map_sup : (N ⊔ N₂).map f = N.map f ⊔ N₂.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
#align lie_submodule.map_sup LieSubmodule.map_sup
@[simp]
theorem comap_inf {N₂' : LieSubmodule R L M'} :
(N' ⊓ N₂').comap f = N'.comap f ⊓ N₂'.comap f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) :
(⨆ i, N i).map f = ⨆ i, (N i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_map (m' : M') : m' ∈ N.map f ↔ ∃ m, m ∈ N ∧ f m = m' :=
Submodule.mem_map
#align lie_submodule.mem_map LieSubmodule.mem_map
theorem mem_map_of_mem {m : M} (h : m ∈ N) : f m ∈ N.map f :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {m : M} : m ∈ comap f N' ↔ f m ∈ N' :=
Iff.rfl
#align lie_submodule.mem_comap LieSubmodule.mem_comap
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Submodule.lean | 915 | 917 | theorem comap_incl_eq_top : N₂.comap N.incl = ⊤ ↔ N ≤ N₂ := by |
rw [← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff, LieSubmodule.coeSubmodule_comap, LieSubmodule.incl_coe,
LieSubmodule.top_coeSubmodule, Submodule.comap_subtype_eq_top, coeSubmodule_le_coeSubmodule]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Directed
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IntermediateField
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SplittingField.IsSplittingField
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
#align_import field_theory.adjoin from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"df76f43357840485b9d04ed5dee5ab115d420e87"
/-!
# Adjoining Elements to Fields
In this file we introduce the notion of adjoining elements to fields.
This isn't quite the same as adjoining elements to rings.
For example, `Algebra.adjoin K {x}` might not include `x⁻¹`.
## Main results
- `adjoin_adjoin_left`: adjoining S and then T is the same as adjoining `S ∪ T`.
- `bot_eq_top_of_rank_adjoin_eq_one`: if `F⟮x⟯` has dimension `1` over `F` for every `x`
in `E` then `F = E`
## Notation
- `F⟮α⟯`: adjoin a single element `α` to `F` (in scope `IntermediateField`).
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial
open scoped Classical Polynomial
namespace IntermediateField
section AdjoinDef
variable (F : Type*) [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E] (S : Set E)
-- Porting note: not adding `neg_mem'` causes an error.
/-- `adjoin F S` extends a field `F` by adjoining a set `S ⊆ E`. -/
def adjoin : IntermediateField F E :=
{ Subfield.closure (Set.range (algebraMap F E) ∪ S) with
algebraMap_mem' := fun x => Subfield.subset_closure (Or.inl (Set.mem_range_self x)) }
#align intermediate_field.adjoin IntermediateField.adjoin
variable {S}
theorem mem_adjoin_iff (x : E) :
x ∈ adjoin F S ↔ ∃ r s : MvPolynomial S F,
x = MvPolynomial.aeval Subtype.val r / MvPolynomial.aeval Subtype.val s := by
simp only [adjoin, mem_mk, Subring.mem_toSubsemiring, Subfield.mem_toSubring,
Subfield.mem_closure_iff, ← Algebra.adjoin_eq_ring_closure, Subalgebra.mem_toSubring,
Algebra.adjoin_eq_range, AlgHom.mem_range, exists_exists_eq_and]
tauto
theorem mem_adjoin_simple_iff {α : E} (x : E) :
x ∈ adjoin F {α} ↔ ∃ r s : F[X], x = aeval α r / aeval α s := by
simp only [adjoin, mem_mk, Subring.mem_toSubsemiring, Subfield.mem_toSubring,
Subfield.mem_closure_iff, ← Algebra.adjoin_eq_ring_closure, Subalgebra.mem_toSubring,
Algebra.adjoin_singleton_eq_range_aeval, AlgHom.mem_range, exists_exists_eq_and]
tauto
end AdjoinDef
section Lattice
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E]
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_le_iff {S : Set E} {T : IntermediateField F E} : adjoin F S ≤ T ↔ S ≤ T :=
⟨fun H => le_trans (le_trans Set.subset_union_right Subfield.subset_closure) H, fun H =>
(@Subfield.closure_le E _ (Set.range (algebraMap F E) ∪ S) T.toSubfield).mpr
(Set.union_subset (IntermediateField.set_range_subset T) H)⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_le_iff IntermediateField.adjoin_le_iff
theorem gc : GaloisConnection (adjoin F : Set E → IntermediateField F E)
(fun (x : IntermediateField F E) => (x : Set E)) := fun _ _ =>
adjoin_le_iff
#align intermediate_field.gc IntermediateField.gc
/-- Galois insertion between `adjoin` and `coe`. -/
def gi : GaloisInsertion (adjoin F : Set E → IntermediateField F E)
(fun (x : IntermediateField F E) => (x : Set E)) where
choice s hs := (adjoin F s).copy s <| le_antisymm (gc.le_u_l s) hs
gc := IntermediateField.gc
le_l_u S := (IntermediateField.gc (S : Set E) (adjoin F S)).1 <| le_rfl
choice_eq _ _ := copy_eq _ _ _
#align intermediate_field.gi IntermediateField.gi
instance : CompleteLattice (IntermediateField F E) where
__ := GaloisInsertion.liftCompleteLattice IntermediateField.gi
bot :=
{ toSubalgebra := ⊥
inv_mem' := by rintro x ⟨r, rfl⟩; exact ⟨r⁻¹, map_inv₀ _ _⟩ }
bot_le x := (bot_le : ⊥ ≤ x.toSubalgebra)
instance : Inhabited (IntermediateField F E) :=
⟨⊤⟩
instance : Unique (IntermediateField F F) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (IntermediateField F F)) with
uniq := fun _ ↦ toSubalgebra_injective <| Subsingleton.elim _ _ }
theorem coe_bot : ↑(⊥ : IntermediateField F E) = Set.range (algebraMap F E) := rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_bot IntermediateField.coe_bot
theorem mem_bot {x : E} : x ∈ (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) ↔ x ∈ Set.range (algebraMap F E) :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_bot IntermediateField.mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_toSubalgebra : (⊥ : IntermediateField F E).toSubalgebra = ⊥ := rfl
#align intermediate_field.bot_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.bot_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : ↑(⊤ : IntermediateField F E) = (Set.univ : Set E) :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_top IntermediateField.coe_top
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {x : E} : x ∈ (⊤ : IntermediateField F E) :=
trivial
#align intermediate_field.mem_top IntermediateField.mem_top
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubalgebra : (⊤ : IntermediateField F E).toSubalgebra = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.top_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.top_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubfield : (⊤ : IntermediateField F E).toSubfield = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.top_to_subfield IntermediateField.top_toSubfield
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (S T : IntermediateField F E) : (↑(S ⊓ T) : Set E) = (S : Set E) ∩ T :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_inf IntermediateField.coe_inf
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {S T : IntermediateField F E} {x : E} : x ∈ S ⊓ T ↔ x ∈ S ∧ x ∈ T :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_inf IntermediateField.mem_inf
@[simp]
theorem inf_toSubalgebra (S T : IntermediateField F E) :
(S ⊓ T).toSubalgebra = S.toSubalgebra ⊓ T.toSubalgebra :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.inf_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.inf_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem inf_toSubfield (S T : IntermediateField F E) :
(S ⊓ T).toSubfield = S.toSubfield ⊓ T.toSubfield :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.inf_to_subfield IntermediateField.inf_toSubfield
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (IntermediateField F E)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set E) =
sInf ((fun (x : IntermediateField F E) => (x : Set E)) '' S) :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_Inf IntermediateField.coe_sInf
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubalgebra (S : Set (IntermediateField F E)) :
(sInf S).toSubalgebra = sInf (toSubalgebra '' S) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [Set.sUnion_image]
#align intermediate_field.Inf_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.sInf_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubfield (S : Set (IntermediateField F E)) :
(sInf S).toSubfield = sInf (toSubfield '' S) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [Set.sUnion_image]
#align intermediate_field.Inf_to_subfield IntermediateField.sInf_toSubfield
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → IntermediateField F E) : (↑(iInf S) : Set E) = ⋂ i, S i := by
simp [iInf]
#align intermediate_field.coe_infi IntermediateField.coe_iInf
@[simp]
theorem iInf_toSubalgebra {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → IntermediateField F E) :
(iInf S).toSubalgebra = ⨅ i, (S i).toSubalgebra :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [iInf]
#align intermediate_field.infi_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.iInf_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem iInf_toSubfield {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → IntermediateField F E) :
(iInf S).toSubfield = ⨅ i, (S i).toSubfield :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [iInf]
#align intermediate_field.infi_to_subfield IntermediateField.iInf_toSubfield
/-- Construct an algebra isomorphism from an equality of intermediate fields -/
@[simps! apply]
def equivOfEq {S T : IntermediateField F E} (h : S = T) : S ≃ₐ[F] T :=
Subalgebra.equivOfEq _ _ (congr_arg toSubalgebra h)
#align intermediate_field.equiv_of_eq IntermediateField.equivOfEq
@[simp]
theorem equivOfEq_symm {S T : IntermediateField F E} (h : S = T) :
(equivOfEq h).symm = equivOfEq h.symm :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.equiv_of_eq_symm IntermediateField.equivOfEq_symm
@[simp]
theorem equivOfEq_rfl (S : IntermediateField F E) : equivOfEq (rfl : S = S) = AlgEquiv.refl := by
ext; rfl
#align intermediate_field.equiv_of_eq_rfl IntermediateField.equivOfEq_rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivOfEq_trans {S T U : IntermediateField F E} (hST : S = T) (hTU : T = U) :
(equivOfEq hST).trans (equivOfEq hTU) = equivOfEq (hST.trans hTU) :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.equiv_of_eq_trans IntermediateField.equivOfEq_trans
variable (F E)
/-- The bottom intermediate_field is isomorphic to the field. -/
noncomputable def botEquiv : (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) ≃ₐ[F] F :=
(Subalgebra.equivOfEq _ _ bot_toSubalgebra).trans (Algebra.botEquiv F E)
#align intermediate_field.bot_equiv IntermediateField.botEquiv
variable {F E}
-- Porting note: this was tagged `simp`.
theorem botEquiv_def (x : F) : botEquiv F E (algebraMap F (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) x) = x := by
simp
#align intermediate_field.bot_equiv_def IntermediateField.botEquiv_def
@[simp]
theorem botEquiv_symm (x : F) : (botEquiv F E).symm x = algebraMap F _ x :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.bot_equiv_symm IntermediateField.botEquiv_symm
noncomputable instance algebraOverBot : Algebra (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) F :=
(IntermediateField.botEquiv F E).toAlgHom.toRingHom.toAlgebra
#align intermediate_field.algebra_over_bot IntermediateField.algebraOverBot
theorem coe_algebraMap_over_bot :
(algebraMap (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) F : (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) → F) =
IntermediateField.botEquiv F E :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_algebra_map_over_bot IntermediateField.coe_algebraMap_over_bot
instance isScalarTower_over_bot : IsScalarTower (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) F E :=
IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq
(by
intro x
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (botEquiv F E).symm.surjective x
rw [coe_algebraMap_over_bot, (botEquiv F E).apply_symm_apply, botEquiv_symm,
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply F (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) E])
#align intermediate_field.is_scalar_tower_over_bot IntermediateField.isScalarTower_over_bot
/-- The top `IntermediateField` is isomorphic to the field.
This is the intermediate field version of `Subalgebra.topEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : IntermediateField F E) ≃ₐ[F] E :=
(Subalgebra.equivOfEq _ _ top_toSubalgebra).trans Subalgebra.topEquiv
#align intermediate_field.top_equiv IntermediateField.topEquiv
-- Porting note: this theorem is now generated by the `@[simps!]` above.
#align intermediate_field.top_equiv_symm_apply_coe IntermediateField.topEquiv_symm_apply_coe
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_bot_eq_self (K : IntermediateField F E) :
(⊥ : IntermediateField K E).restrictScalars _ = K :=
SetLike.coe_injective Subtype.range_coe
#align intermediate_field.restrict_scalars_bot_eq_self IntermediateField.restrictScalars_bot_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_top {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra K E] [Algebra K F]
[IsScalarTower K F E] : (⊤ : IntermediateField F E).restrictScalars K = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.restrict_scalars_top IntermediateField.restrictScalars_top
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra F K]
@[simp]
theorem map_bot (f : E →ₐ[F] K) :
IntermediateField.map f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
toSubalgebra_injective <| Algebra.map_bot _
theorem map_sup (s t : IntermediateField F E) (f : E →ₐ[F] K) : (s ⊔ t).map f = s.map f ⊔ t.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : E →ₐ[F] K) (s : ι → IntermediateField F E) :
(iSup s).map f = ⨆ i, (s i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_iSup
theorem _root_.AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_map (f : E →ₐ[F] K) :
f.fieldRange = IntermediateField.map f ⊤ :=
SetLike.ext' Set.image_univ.symm
#align alg_hom.field_range_eq_map AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_map
theorem _root_.AlgHom.map_fieldRange {L : Type*} [Field L] [Algebra F L]
(f : E →ₐ[F] K) (g : K →ₐ[F] L) : f.fieldRange.map g = (g.comp f).fieldRange :=
SetLike.ext' (Set.range_comp g f).symm
#align alg_hom.map_field_range AlgHom.map_fieldRange
theorem _root_.AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_top {f : E →ₐ[F] K} :
f.fieldRange = ⊤ ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.trans Set.range_iff_surjective
#align alg_hom.field_range_eq_top AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AlgEquiv.fieldRange_eq_top (f : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
(f : E →ₐ[F] K).fieldRange = ⊤ :=
AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_top.mpr f.surjective
#align alg_equiv.field_range_eq_top AlgEquiv.fieldRange_eq_top
end Lattice
section equivMap
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E]
{K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra F K] (L : IntermediateField F E) (f : E →ₐ[F] K)
theorem fieldRange_comp_val : (f.comp L.val).fieldRange = L.map f := toSubalgebra_injective <| by
rw [toSubalgebra_map, AlgHom.fieldRange_toSubalgebra, AlgHom.range_comp, range_val]
/-- An intermediate field is isomorphic to its image under an `AlgHom`
(which is automatically injective) -/
noncomputable def equivMap : L ≃ₐ[F] L.map f :=
(AlgEquiv.ofInjective _ (f.comp L.val).injective).trans (equivOfEq (fieldRange_comp_val L f))
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivMap_apply (x : L) : ↑(equivMap L f x) = f x := rfl
end equivMap
section AdjoinDef
variable (F : Type*) [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E] (S : Set E)
theorem adjoin_eq_range_algebraMap_adjoin :
(adjoin F S : Set E) = Set.range (algebraMap (adjoin F S) E) :=
Subtype.range_coe.symm
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_eq_range_algebra_map_adjoin IntermediateField.adjoin_eq_range_algebraMap_adjoin
theorem adjoin.algebraMap_mem (x : F) : algebraMap F E x ∈ adjoin F S :=
IntermediateField.algebraMap_mem (adjoin F S) x
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.algebra_map_mem IntermediateField.adjoin.algebraMap_mem
theorem adjoin.range_algebraMap_subset : Set.range (algebraMap F E) ⊆ adjoin F S := by
intro x hx
cases' hx with f hf
rw [← hf]
exact adjoin.algebraMap_mem F S f
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.range_algebra_map_subset IntermediateField.adjoin.range_algebraMap_subset
instance adjoin.fieldCoe : CoeTC F (adjoin F S) where
coe x := ⟨algebraMap F E x, adjoin.algebraMap_mem F S x⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.field_coe IntermediateField.adjoin.fieldCoe
theorem subset_adjoin : S ⊆ adjoin F S := fun _ hx => Subfield.subset_closure (Or.inr hx)
#align intermediate_field.subset_adjoin IntermediateField.subset_adjoin
instance adjoin.setCoe : CoeTC S (adjoin F S) where coe x := ⟨x, subset_adjoin F S (Subtype.mem x)⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.set_coe IntermediateField.adjoin.setCoe
@[mono]
theorem adjoin.mono (T : Set E) (h : S ⊆ T) : adjoin F S ≤ adjoin F T :=
GaloisConnection.monotone_l gc h
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.mono IntermediateField.adjoin.mono
theorem adjoin_contains_field_as_subfield (F : Subfield E) : (F : Set E) ⊆ adjoin F S := fun x hx =>
adjoin.algebraMap_mem F S ⟨x, hx⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_contains_field_as_subfield IntermediateField.adjoin_contains_field_as_subfield
theorem subset_adjoin_of_subset_left {F : Subfield E} {T : Set E} (HT : T ⊆ F) : T ⊆ adjoin F S :=
fun x hx => (adjoin F S).algebraMap_mem ⟨x, HT hx⟩
#align intermediate_field.subset_adjoin_of_subset_left IntermediateField.subset_adjoin_of_subset_left
theorem subset_adjoin_of_subset_right {T : Set E} (H : T ⊆ S) : T ⊆ adjoin F S := fun _ hx =>
subset_adjoin F S (H hx)
#align intermediate_field.subset_adjoin_of_subset_right IntermediateField.subset_adjoin_of_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_empty (F E : Type*) [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E] : adjoin F (∅ : Set E) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.mpr (adjoin_le_iff.mpr (Set.empty_subset _))
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_empty IntermediateField.adjoin_empty
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_univ (F E : Type*) [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E] :
adjoin F (Set.univ : Set E) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr <| subset_adjoin _ _
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_univ IntermediateField.adjoin_univ
/-- If `K` is a field with `F ⊆ K` and `S ⊆ K` then `adjoin F S ≤ K`. -/
theorem adjoin_le_subfield {K : Subfield E} (HF : Set.range (algebraMap F E) ⊆ K) (HS : S ⊆ K) :
(adjoin F S).toSubfield ≤ K := by
apply Subfield.closure_le.mpr
rw [Set.union_subset_iff]
exact ⟨HF, HS⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_le_subfield IntermediateField.adjoin_le_subfield
theorem adjoin_subset_adjoin_iff {F' : Type*} [Field F'] [Algebra F' E] {S S' : Set E} :
(adjoin F S : Set E) ⊆ adjoin F' S' ↔
Set.range (algebraMap F E) ⊆ adjoin F' S' ∧ S ⊆ adjoin F' S' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(adjoin.range_algebraMap_subset _ _).trans h,
(subset_adjoin _ _).trans h⟩, fun ⟨hF, hS⟩ =>
(Subfield.closure_le (t := (adjoin F' S').toSubfield)).mpr (Set.union_subset hF hS)⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_subset_adjoin_iff IntermediateField.adjoin_subset_adjoin_iff
/-- `F[S][T] = F[S ∪ T]` -/
theorem adjoin_adjoin_left (T : Set E) :
(adjoin (adjoin F S) T).restrictScalars _ = adjoin F (S ∪ T) := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff]
change (↑(adjoin (adjoin F S) T) : Set E) = _
apply Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset <;> rw [adjoin_subset_adjoin_iff] <;> constructor
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩; exact adjoin.mono _ _ _ Set.subset_union_left hx
· exact subset_adjoin_of_subset_right _ _ Set.subset_union_right
-- Porting note: orginal proof times out
· rintro x ⟨f, rfl⟩
refine Subfield.subset_closure ?_
left
exact ⟨f, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: orginal proof times out
· refine Set.union_subset (fun x hx => Subfield.subset_closure ?_)
(fun x hx => Subfield.subset_closure ?_)
· left
refine ⟨⟨x, Subfield.subset_closure ?_⟩, rfl⟩
right
exact hx
· right
exact hx
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_adjoin_left IntermediateField.adjoin_adjoin_left
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_insert_adjoin (x : E) :
adjoin F (insert x (adjoin F S : Set E)) = adjoin F (insert x S) :=
le_antisymm
(adjoin_le_iff.mpr
(Set.insert_subset_iff.mpr
⟨subset_adjoin _ _ (Set.mem_insert _ _),
adjoin_le_iff.mpr (subset_adjoin_of_subset_right _ _ (Set.subset_insert _ _))⟩))
(adjoin.mono _ _ _ (Set.insert_subset_insert (subset_adjoin _ _)))
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_insert_adjoin IntermediateField.adjoin_insert_adjoin
/-- `F[S][T] = F[T][S]` -/
theorem adjoin_adjoin_comm (T : Set E) :
(adjoin (adjoin F S) T).restrictScalars F = (adjoin (adjoin F T) S).restrictScalars F := by
rw [adjoin_adjoin_left, adjoin_adjoin_left, Set.union_comm]
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_adjoin_comm IntermediateField.adjoin_adjoin_comm
theorem adjoin_map {E' : Type*} [Field E'] [Algebra F E'] (f : E →ₐ[F] E') :
(adjoin F S).map f = adjoin F (f '' S) := by
ext x
show
x ∈ (Subfield.closure (Set.range (algebraMap F E) ∪ S)).map (f : E →+* E') ↔
x ∈ Subfield.closure (Set.range (algebraMap F E') ∪ f '' S)
rw [RingHom.map_field_closure, Set.image_union, ← Set.range_comp, ← RingHom.coe_comp,
f.comp_algebraMap]
rfl
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_map IntermediateField.adjoin_map
@[simp]
theorem lift_adjoin (K : IntermediateField F E) (S : Set K) :
lift (adjoin F S) = adjoin F (Subtype.val '' S) :=
adjoin_map _ _ _
theorem lift_adjoin_simple (K : IntermediateField F E) (α : K) :
lift (adjoin F {α}) = adjoin F {α.1} := by
simp only [lift_adjoin, Set.image_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem lift_bot (K : IntermediateField F E) :
lift (F := K) ⊥ = ⊥ := map_bot _
@[simp]
theorem lift_top (K : IntermediateField F E) :
lift (F := K) ⊤ = K := by rw [lift, ← AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_map, fieldRange_val]
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_self (K : IntermediateField F E) :
adjoin F K = K := le_antisymm (adjoin_le_iff.2 fun _ ↦ id) (subset_adjoin F _)
theorem restrictScalars_adjoin (K : IntermediateField F E) (S : Set E) :
restrictScalars F (adjoin K S) = adjoin F (K ∪ S) := by
rw [← adjoin_self _ K, adjoin_adjoin_left, adjoin_self _ K]
variable {F} in
theorem extendScalars_adjoin {K : IntermediateField F E} {S : Set E} (h : K ≤ adjoin F S) :
extendScalars h = adjoin K S := restrictScalars_injective F <| by
rw [extendScalars_restrictScalars, restrictScalars_adjoin]
exact le_antisymm (adjoin.mono F S _ Set.subset_union_right) <| adjoin_le_iff.2 <|
Set.union_subset h (subset_adjoin F S)
variable {F} in
/-- If `E / L / F` and `E / L' / F` are two field extension towers, `L ≃ₐ[F] L'` is an isomorphism
compatible with `E / L` and `E / L'`, then for any subset `S` of `E`, `L(S)` and `L'(S)` are
equal as intermediate fields of `E / F`. -/
theorem restrictScalars_adjoin_of_algEquiv
{L L' : Type*} [Field L] [Field L']
[Algebra F L] [Algebra L E] [Algebra F L'] [Algebra L' E]
[IsScalarTower F L E] [IsScalarTower F L' E] (i : L ≃ₐ[F] L')
(hi : algebraMap L E = (algebraMap L' E) ∘ i) (S : Set E) :
(adjoin L S).restrictScalars F = (adjoin L' S).restrictScalars F := by
apply_fun toSubfield using (fun K K' h ↦ by
ext x; change x ∈ K.toSubfield ↔ x ∈ K'.toSubfield; rw [h])
change Subfield.closure _ = Subfield.closure _
congr
ext x
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, h⟩ ↦ ⟨i y, by rw [← h, hi]; rfl⟩,
fun ⟨y, h⟩ ↦ ⟨i.symm y, by rw [← h, hi, Function.comp_apply, AlgEquiv.apply_symm_apply]⟩⟩
theorem algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin : Algebra.adjoin F S ≤ (adjoin F S).toSubalgebra :=
Algebra.adjoin_le (subset_adjoin _ _)
#align intermediate_field.algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin IntermediateField.algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin
theorem adjoin_eq_algebra_adjoin (inv_mem : ∀ x ∈ Algebra.adjoin F S, x⁻¹ ∈ Algebra.adjoin F S) :
(adjoin F S).toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin F S :=
le_antisymm
(show adjoin F S ≤
{ Algebra.adjoin F S with
inv_mem' := inv_mem }
from adjoin_le_iff.mpr Algebra.subset_adjoin)
(algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin _ _)
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_eq_algebra_adjoin IntermediateField.adjoin_eq_algebra_adjoin
theorem eq_adjoin_of_eq_algebra_adjoin (K : IntermediateField F E)
(h : K.toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin F S) : K = adjoin F S := by
apply toSubalgebra_injective
rw [h]
refine (adjoin_eq_algebra_adjoin F _ ?_).symm
intro x
convert K.inv_mem (x := x) <;> rw [← h] <;> rfl
#align intermediate_field.eq_adjoin_of_eq_algebra_adjoin IntermediateField.eq_adjoin_of_eq_algebra_adjoin
theorem adjoin_eq_top_of_algebra (hS : Algebra.adjoin F S = ⊤) : adjoin F S = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.mp (hS.symm.trans_le <| algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin F S)
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem adjoin_induction {s : Set E} {p : E → Prop} {x} (h : x ∈ adjoin F s) (mem : ∀ x ∈ s, p x)
(algebraMap : ∀ x, p (algebraMap F E x)) (add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y))
(neg : ∀ x, p x → p (-x)) (inv : ∀ x, p x → p x⁻¹) (mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) :
p x :=
Subfield.closure_induction h
(fun x hx => Or.casesOn hx (fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => hx ▸ algebraMap x) (mem x))
((_root_.algebraMap F E).map_one ▸ algebraMap 1) add neg inv mul
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_induction IntermediateField.adjoin_induction
/- Porting note (kmill): this notation is replacing the typeclass-based one I had previously
written, and it gives true `{x₁, x₂, ..., xₙ}` sets in the `adjoin` term. -/
open Lean in
/-- Supporting function for the `F⟮x₁,x₂,...,xₙ⟯` adjunction notation. -/
private partial def mkInsertTerm [Monad m] [MonadQuotation m] (xs : TSyntaxArray `term) : m Term :=
run 0
where
run (i : Nat) : m Term := do
if i + 1 == xs.size then
``(singleton $(xs[i]!))
else if i < xs.size then
``(insert $(xs[i]!) $(← run (i + 1)))
else
``(EmptyCollection.emptyCollection)
/-- If `x₁ x₂ ... xₙ : E` then `F⟮x₁,x₂,...,xₙ⟯` is the `IntermediateField F E`
generated by these elements. -/
scoped macro:max K:term "⟮" xs:term,* "⟯" : term => do ``(adjoin $K $(← mkInsertTerm xs.getElems))
open Lean PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr in
@[delab app.IntermediateField.adjoin]
partial def delabAdjoinNotation : Delab := whenPPOption getPPNotation do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity ``adjoin 6
let F ← withNaryArg 0 delab
let xs ← withNaryArg 5 delabInsertArray
`($F⟮$(xs.toArray),*⟯)
where
delabInsertArray : DelabM (List Term) := do
let e ← getExpr
if e.isAppOfArity ``EmptyCollection.emptyCollection 2 then
return []
else if e.isAppOfArity ``singleton 4 then
let x ← withNaryArg 3 delab
return [x]
else if e.isAppOfArity ``insert 5 then
let x ← withNaryArg 3 delab
let xs ← withNaryArg 4 delabInsertArray
return x :: xs
else failure
section AdjoinSimple
variable (α : E)
-- Porting note: in all the theorems below, mathport translated `F⟮α⟯` into `F⟮⟯`.
theorem mem_adjoin_simple_self : α ∈ F⟮α⟯ :=
subset_adjoin F {α} (Set.mem_singleton α)
#align intermediate_field.mem_adjoin_simple_self IntermediateField.mem_adjoin_simple_self
/-- generator of `F⟮α⟯` -/
def AdjoinSimple.gen : F⟮α⟯ :=
⟨α, mem_adjoin_simple_self F α⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple.gen IntermediateField.AdjoinSimple.gen
@[simp]
theorem AdjoinSimple.coe_gen : (AdjoinSimple.gen F α : E) = α :=
rfl
theorem AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen : algebraMap F⟮α⟯ E (AdjoinSimple.gen F α) = α :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple.algebra_map_gen IntermediateField.AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen
@[simp]
theorem AdjoinSimple.isIntegral_gen : IsIntegral F (AdjoinSimple.gen F α) ↔ IsIntegral F α := by
conv_rhs => rw [← AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen F α]
rw [isIntegral_algebraMap_iff (algebraMap F⟮α⟯ E).injective]
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple.is_integral_gen IntermediateField.AdjoinSimple.isIntegral_gen
theorem adjoin_simple_adjoin_simple (β : E) : F⟮α⟯⟮β⟯.restrictScalars F = F⟮α, β⟯ :=
adjoin_adjoin_left _ _ _
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_adjoin_simple IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_adjoin_simple
theorem adjoin_simple_comm (β : E) : F⟮α⟯⟮β⟯.restrictScalars F = F⟮β⟯⟮α⟯.restrictScalars F :=
adjoin_adjoin_comm _ _ _
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_comm IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_comm
variable {F} {α}
theorem adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra {S : Set E} (hS : ∀ x ∈ S, IsAlgebraic F x) :
(IntermediateField.adjoin F S).toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin F S := by
simp only [isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral] at hS
have : Algebra.IsIntegral F (Algebra.adjoin F S) := by
rwa [← le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral, Algebra.adjoin_le_iff]
have : IsField (Algebra.adjoin F S) := isField_of_isIntegral_of_isField' (Field.toIsField F)
rw [← ((Algebra.adjoin F S).toIntermediateField' this).eq_adjoin_of_eq_algebra_adjoin F S] <;> rfl
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_algebraic_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra
theorem adjoin_simple_toSubalgebra_of_integral (hα : IsIntegral F α) :
F⟮α⟯.toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin F {α} := by
apply adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra
rintro x (rfl : x = α)
rwa [isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral]
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_to_subalgebra_of_integral IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_toSubalgebra_of_integral
/-- Characterize `IsSplittingField` with `IntermediateField.adjoin` instead of `Algebra.adjoin`. -/
theorem _root_.isSplittingField_iff_intermediateField {p : F[X]} :
p.IsSplittingField F E ↔ p.Splits (algebraMap F E) ∧ adjoin F (p.rootSet E) = ⊤ := by
rw [← toSubalgebra_injective.eq_iff,
adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra fun _ ↦ isAlgebraic_of_mem_rootSet]
exact ⟨fun ⟨spl, adj⟩ ↦ ⟨spl, adj⟩, fun ⟨spl, adj⟩ ↦ ⟨spl, adj⟩⟩
-- Note: p.Splits (algebraMap F E) also works
theorem isSplittingField_iff {p : F[X]} {K : IntermediateField F E} :
p.IsSplittingField F K ↔ p.Splits (algebraMap F K) ∧ K = adjoin F (p.rootSet E) := by
suffices _ → (Algebra.adjoin F (p.rootSet K) = ⊤ ↔ K = adjoin F (p.rootSet E)) by
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, (this h.1).mp h.2⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, (this h.1).mpr h.2⟩⟩
rw [← toSubalgebra_injective.eq_iff,
adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra fun x ↦ isAlgebraic_of_mem_rootSet]
refine fun hp ↦ (adjoin_rootSet_eq_range hp K.val).symm.trans ?_
rw [← K.range_val, eq_comm]
#align intermediate_field.is_splitting_field_iff IntermediateField.isSplittingField_iff
theorem adjoin_rootSet_isSplittingField {p : F[X]} (hp : p.Splits (algebraMap F E)) :
p.IsSplittingField F (adjoin F (p.rootSet E)) :=
isSplittingField_iff.mpr ⟨splits_of_splits hp fun _ hx ↦ subset_adjoin F (p.rootSet E) hx, rfl⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_root_set_is_splitting_field IntermediateField.adjoin_rootSet_isSplittingField
section Supremum
variable {K L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L] (E1 E2 : IntermediateField K L)
theorem le_sup_toSubalgebra : E1.toSubalgebra ⊔ E2.toSubalgebra ≤ (E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra :=
sup_le (show E1 ≤ E1 ⊔ E2 from le_sup_left) (show E2 ≤ E1 ⊔ E2 from le_sup_right)
#align intermediate_field.le_sup_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.le_sup_toSubalgebra
theorem sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_right [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K E2] :
(E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra = E1.toSubalgebra ⊔ E2.toSubalgebra := by
have : (adjoin E1 (E2 : Set L)).toSubalgebra = _ := adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra fun x h ↦
IsAlgebraic.tower_top E1 (isAlgebraic_iff.1
(Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isAlgebraic (⟨x, h⟩ : E2)))
apply_fun Subalgebra.restrictScalars K at this
erw [← restrictScalars_toSubalgebra, restrictScalars_adjoin,
Algebra.restrictScalars_adjoin] at this
exact this
theorem sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_left [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K E1] :
(E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra = E1.toSubalgebra ⊔ E2.toSubalgebra := by
have := sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_right E2 E1
rwa [sup_comm (a := E1), sup_comm (a := E1.toSubalgebra)]
/-- The compositum of two intermediate fields is equal to the compositum of them
as subalgebras, if one of them is algebraic over the base field. -/
theorem sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic
(halg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic K E1 ∨ Algebra.IsAlgebraic K E2) :
(E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra = E1.toSubalgebra ⊔ E2.toSubalgebra :=
halg.elim (fun _ ↦ sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_left E1 E2)
(fun _ ↦ sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_right E1 E2)
theorem sup_toSubalgebra_of_left [FiniteDimensional K E1] :
(E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra = E1.toSubalgebra ⊔ E2.toSubalgebra :=
sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_left E1 E2
#align intermediate_field.sup_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.sup_toSubalgebra_of_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-19")] alias sup_toSubalgebra := sup_toSubalgebra_of_left
theorem sup_toSubalgebra_of_right [FiniteDimensional K E2] :
(E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra = E1.toSubalgebra ⊔ E2.toSubalgebra :=
sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_right E1 E2
instance finiteDimensional_sup [FiniteDimensional K E1] [FiniteDimensional K E2] :
FiniteDimensional K (E1 ⊔ E2 : IntermediateField K L) := by
let g := Algebra.TensorProduct.productMap E1.val E2.val
suffices g.range = (E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra by
have h : FiniteDimensional K (Subalgebra.toSubmodule g.range) :=
g.toLinearMap.finiteDimensional_range
rwa [this] at h
rw [Algebra.TensorProduct.productMap_range, E1.range_val, E2.range_val, sup_toSubalgebra_of_left]
#align intermediate_field.finite_dimensional_sup IntermediateField.finiteDimensional_sup
variable {ι : Type*} {t : ι → IntermediateField K L}
theorem coe_iSup_of_directed [Nonempty ι] (dir : Directed (· ≤ ·) t) :
↑(iSup t) = ⋃ i, (t i : Set L) :=
let M : IntermediateField K L :=
{ __ := Subalgebra.copy _ _ (Subalgebra.coe_iSup_of_directed dir).symm
inv_mem' := fun _ hx ↦ have ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.mp hx
Set.mem_iUnion.mpr ⟨i, (t i).inv_mem hi⟩ }
have : iSup t = M := le_antisymm
(iSup_le fun i ↦ le_iSup (fun i ↦ (t i : Set L)) i) (Set.iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ le_iSup t _)
this.symm ▸ rfl
theorem toSubalgebra_iSup_of_directed (dir : Directed (· ≤ ·) t) :
(iSup t).toSubalgebra = ⨆ i, (t i).toSubalgebra := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp_rw [iSup_of_empty, bot_toSubalgebra]
· exact SetLike.ext' ((coe_iSup_of_directed dir).trans (Subalgebra.coe_iSup_of_directed dir).symm)
instance finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finite [h : Finite ι] [∀ i, FiniteDimensional K (t i)] :
FiniteDimensional K (⨆ i, t i : IntermediateField K L) := by
rw [← iSup_univ]
let P : Set ι → Prop := fun s => FiniteDimensional K (⨆ i ∈ s, t i : IntermediateField K L)
change P Set.univ
apply Set.Finite.induction_on
all_goals dsimp only [P]
· exact Set.finite_univ
· rw [iSup_emptyset]
exact (botEquiv K L).symm.toLinearEquiv.finiteDimensional
· intro _ s _ _ hs
rw [iSup_insert]
exact IntermediateField.finiteDimensional_sup _ _
#align intermediate_field.finite_dimensional_supr_of_finite IntermediateField.finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finite
instance finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finset
/- Porting note: changed `h` from `∀ i ∈ s, FiniteDimensional K (t i)` because this caused an
error. See `finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finset'` for a stronger version, that was the one
used in mathlib3. -/
{s : Finset ι} [∀ i, FiniteDimensional K (t i)] :
FiniteDimensional K (⨆ i ∈ s, t i : IntermediateField K L) :=
iSup_subtype'' s t ▸ IntermediateField.finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finite
#align intermediate_field.finite_dimensional_supr_of_finset IntermediateField.finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finset
theorem finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finset'
/- Porting note: this was the mathlib3 version. Using `[h : ...]`, as in mathlib3, causes the
error "invalid parametric local instance". -/
{s : Finset ι} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, FiniteDimensional K (t i)) :
FiniteDimensional K (⨆ i ∈ s, t i : IntermediateField K L) :=
have := Subtype.forall'.mp h
iSup_subtype'' s t ▸ IntermediateField.finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finite
/-- A compositum of splitting fields is a splitting field -/
theorem isSplittingField_iSup {p : ι → K[X]}
{s : Finset ι} (h0 : ∏ i ∈ s, p i ≠ 0) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, (p i).IsSplittingField K (t i)) :
(∏ i ∈ s, p i).IsSplittingField K (⨆ i ∈ s, t i : IntermediateField K L) := by
let F : IntermediateField K L := ⨆ i ∈ s, t i
have hF : ∀ i ∈ s, t i ≤ F := fun i hi ↦ le_iSup_of_le i (le_iSup (fun _ ↦ t i) hi)
simp only [isSplittingField_iff] at h ⊢
refine
⟨splits_prod (algebraMap K F) fun i hi ↦
splits_comp_of_splits (algebraMap K (t i)) (inclusion (hF i hi)).toRingHom
(h i hi).1,
?_⟩
simp only [rootSet_prod p s h0, ← Set.iSup_eq_iUnion, (@gc K _ L _ _).l_iSup₂]
exact iSup_congr fun i ↦ iSup_congr fun hi ↦ (h i hi).2
#align intermediate_field.is_splitting_field_supr IntermediateField.isSplittingField_iSup
end Supremum
section Tower
variable (E)
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra F K] [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K]
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, `L` is an intermediate field of `K / F`, such that
either `E / F` or `L / F` is algebraic, then `E(L) = E[L]`. -/
theorem adjoin_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic (L : IntermediateField F K)
(halg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E ∨ Algebra.IsAlgebraic F L) :
(adjoin E (L : Set K)).toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin E (L : Set K) := by
let i := IsScalarTower.toAlgHom F E K
let E' := i.fieldRange
let i' : E ≃ₐ[F] E' := AlgEquiv.ofInjectiveField i
have hi : algebraMap E K = (algebraMap E' K) ∘ i' := by ext x; rfl
apply_fun _ using Subalgebra.restrictScalars_injective F
erw [← restrictScalars_toSubalgebra, restrictScalars_adjoin_of_algEquiv i' hi,
Algebra.restrictScalars_adjoin_of_algEquiv i' hi, restrictScalars_adjoin,
Algebra.restrictScalars_adjoin]
exact E'.sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic L (halg.imp
(fun (_ : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E) ↦ i'.isAlgebraic) id)
theorem adjoin_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_left (L : IntermediateField F K)
[halg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E] :
(adjoin E (L : Set K)).toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin E (L : Set K) :=
adjoin_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic E L (Or.inl halg)
theorem adjoin_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_right (L : IntermediateField F K)
[halg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F L] :
(adjoin E (L : Set K)).toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin E (L : Set K) :=
adjoin_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic E L (Or.inr halg)
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, `L` is an intermediate field of `K / F`, such that
either `E / F` or `L / F` is algebraic, then `[E(L) : E] ≤ [L : F]`. A corollary of
`Subalgebra.adjoin_rank_le` since in this case `E(L) = E[L]`. -/
theorem adjoin_rank_le_of_isAlgebraic (L : IntermediateField F K)
(halg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E ∨ Algebra.IsAlgebraic F L) :
Module.rank E (adjoin E (L : Set K)) ≤ Module.rank F L := by
have h : (adjoin E (L.toSubalgebra : Set K)).toSubalgebra =
Algebra.adjoin E (L.toSubalgebra : Set K) :=
L.adjoin_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic E halg
have := L.toSubalgebra.adjoin_rank_le E
rwa [(Subalgebra.equivOfEq _ _ h).symm.toLinearEquiv.rank_eq] at this
theorem adjoin_rank_le_of_isAlgebraic_left (L : IntermediateField F K)
[halg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E] :
Module.rank E (adjoin E (L : Set K)) ≤ Module.rank F L :=
adjoin_rank_le_of_isAlgebraic E L (Or.inl halg)
theorem adjoin_rank_le_of_isAlgebraic_right (L : IntermediateField F K)
[halg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F L] :
Module.rank E (adjoin E (L : Set K)) ≤ Module.rank F L :=
adjoin_rank_le_of_isAlgebraic E L (Or.inr halg)
end Tower
open Set CompleteLattice
/- Porting note: this was tagged `simp`, but the LHS can be simplified now that the notation
has been improved. -/
theorem adjoin_simple_le_iff {K : IntermediateField F E} : F⟮α⟯ ≤ K ↔ α ∈ K := by simp
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_le_iff IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_le_iff
theorem biSup_adjoin_simple : ⨆ x ∈ S, F⟮x⟯ = adjoin F S := by
rw [← iSup_subtype'', ← gc.l_iSup, iSup_subtype'']; congr; exact S.biUnion_of_singleton
/-- Adjoining a single element is compact in the lattice of intermediate fields. -/
theorem adjoin_simple_isCompactElement (x : E) : IsCompactElement F⟮x⟯ := by
simp_rw [isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le,
adjoin_simple_le_iff, sSup_eq_iSup', ← exists_prop]
intro s hne hs hx
have := hne.to_subtype
rwa [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_iSup_of_directed hs.directed_val, mem_iUnion, Subtype.exists] at hx
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_is_compact_element IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_isCompactElement
-- Porting note: original proof times out.
/-- Adjoining a finite subset is compact in the lattice of intermediate fields. -/
theorem adjoin_finset_isCompactElement (S : Finset E) :
IsCompactElement (adjoin F S : IntermediateField F E) := by
rw [← biSup_adjoin_simple]
simp_rw [Finset.mem_coe, ← Finset.sup_eq_iSup]
exact isCompactElement_finsetSup S fun x _ => adjoin_simple_isCompactElement x
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_finset_is_compact_element IntermediateField.adjoin_finset_isCompactElement
/-- Adjoining a finite subset is compact in the lattice of intermediate fields. -/
theorem adjoin_finite_isCompactElement {S : Set E} (h : S.Finite) : IsCompactElement (adjoin F S) :=
Finite.coe_toFinset h ▸ adjoin_finset_isCompactElement h.toFinset
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_finite_is_compact_element IntermediateField.adjoin_finite_isCompactElement
/-- The lattice of intermediate fields is compactly generated. -/
instance : IsCompactlyGenerated (IntermediateField F E) :=
⟨fun s =>
⟨(fun x => F⟮x⟯) '' s,
⟨by rintro t ⟨x, _, rfl⟩; exact adjoin_simple_isCompactElement x,
sSup_image.trans <| (biSup_adjoin_simple _).trans <|
le_antisymm (adjoin_le_iff.mpr le_rfl) <| subset_adjoin F (s : Set E)⟩⟩⟩
theorem exists_finset_of_mem_iSup {ι : Type*} {f : ι → IntermediateField F E} {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, f i) : ∃ s : Finset ι, x ∈ ⨆ i ∈ s, f i := by
have := (adjoin_simple_isCompactElement x).exists_finset_of_le_iSup (IntermediateField F E) f
simp only [adjoin_simple_le_iff] at this
exact this hx
#align intermediate_field.exists_finset_of_mem_supr IntermediateField.exists_finset_of_mem_iSup
theorem exists_finset_of_mem_supr' {ι : Type*} {f : ι → IntermediateField F E} {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, f i) : ∃ s : Finset (Σ i, f i), x ∈ ⨆ i ∈ s, F⟮(i.2 : E)⟯ := by
-- Porting note: writing `fun i x h => ...` does not work.
refine exists_finset_of_mem_iSup (SetLike.le_def.mp (iSup_le fun i ↦ ?_) hx)
exact fun x h ↦ SetLike.le_def.mp (le_iSup_of_le ⟨i, x, h⟩ (by simp)) (mem_adjoin_simple_self F x)
#align intermediate_field.exists_finset_of_mem_supr' IntermediateField.exists_finset_of_mem_supr'
theorem exists_finset_of_mem_supr'' {ι : Type*} {f : ι → IntermediateField F E}
(h : ∀ i, Algebra.IsAlgebraic F (f i)) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, f i) :
∃ s : Finset (Σ i, f i), x ∈ ⨆ i ∈ s, adjoin F ((minpoly F (i.2 : _)).rootSet E) := by
-- Porting note: writing `fun i x1 hx1 => ...` does not work.
refine exists_finset_of_mem_iSup (SetLike.le_def.mp (iSup_le (fun i => ?_)) hx)
intro x1 hx1
refine SetLike.le_def.mp (le_iSup_of_le ⟨i, x1, hx1⟩ ?_)
(subset_adjoin F (rootSet (minpoly F x1) E) ?_)
· rw [IntermediateField.minpoly_eq, Subtype.coe_mk]
· rw [mem_rootSet_of_ne, minpoly.aeval]
exact minpoly.ne_zero (isIntegral_iff.mp (Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral (⟨x1, hx1⟩ : f i)))
#align intermediate_field.exists_finset_of_mem_supr'' IntermediateField.exists_finset_of_mem_supr''
theorem exists_finset_of_mem_adjoin {S : Set E} {x : E} (hx : x ∈ adjoin F S) :
∃ T : Finset E, (T : Set E) ⊆ S ∧ x ∈ adjoin F (T : Set E) := by
simp_rw [← biSup_adjoin_simple S, ← iSup_subtype''] at hx
obtain ⟨s, hx'⟩ := exists_finset_of_mem_iSup hx
refine ⟨s.image Subtype.val, by simp, SetLike.le_def.mp ?_ hx'⟩
simp_rw [Finset.coe_image, iSup_le_iff, adjoin_le_iff]
rintro _ h _ rfl
exact subset_adjoin F _ ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
end AdjoinSimple
end AdjoinDef
section AdjoinIntermediateFieldLattice
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E] {α : E} {S : Set E}
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_eq_bot_iff : adjoin F S = ⊥ ↔ S ⊆ (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) := by
rw [eq_bot_iff, adjoin_le_iff]; rfl
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_eq_bot_iff IntermediateField.adjoin_eq_bot_iff
/- Porting note: this was tagged `simp`. -/
theorem adjoin_simple_eq_bot_iff : F⟮α⟯ = ⊥ ↔ α ∈ (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) := by
simp
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_eq_bot_iff IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_zero : F⟮(0 : E)⟯ = ⊥ :=
adjoin_simple_eq_bot_iff.mpr (zero_mem ⊥)
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_zero IntermediateField.adjoin_zero
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_one : F⟮(1 : E)⟯ = ⊥ :=
adjoin_simple_eq_bot_iff.mpr (one_mem ⊥)
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_one IntermediateField.adjoin_one
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_intCast (n : ℤ) : F⟮(n : E)⟯ = ⊥ := by
exact adjoin_simple_eq_bot_iff.mpr (intCast_mem ⊥ n)
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_int IntermediateField.adjoin_intCast
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_natCast (n : ℕ) : F⟮(n : E)⟯ = ⊥ :=
adjoin_simple_eq_bot_iff.mpr (natCast_mem ⊥ n)
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_nat IntermediateField.adjoin_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias adjoin_int := adjoin_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias adjoin_nat := adjoin_natCast
section AdjoinRank
open FiniteDimensional Module
variable {K L : IntermediateField F E}
@[simp]
theorem rank_eq_one_iff : Module.rank F K = 1 ↔ K = ⊥ := by
rw [← toSubalgebra_eq_iff, ← rank_eq_rank_subalgebra, Subalgebra.rank_eq_one_iff,
bot_toSubalgebra]
#align intermediate_field.rank_eq_one_iff IntermediateField.rank_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Adjoin.lean | 974 | 976 | theorem finrank_eq_one_iff : finrank F K = 1 ↔ K = ⊥ := by |
rw [← toSubalgebra_eq_iff, ← finrank_eq_finrank_subalgebra, Subalgebra.finrank_eq_one_iff,
bot_toSubalgebra]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Free
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.CofilteredLimit
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Product
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyConstant.Algebra
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Bool.Lemmas
/-!
# Nöbeling's theorem
This file proves Nöbeling's theorem.
## Main result
* `LocallyConstant.freeOfProfinite`: Nöbeling's theorem.
For `S : Profinite`, the `ℤ`-module `LocallyConstant S ℤ` is free.
## Proof idea
We follow the proof of theorem 5.4 in [scholze2019condensed], in which the idea is to embed `S` in
a product of `I` copies of `Bool` for some sufficiently large `I`, and then to choose a
well-ordering on `I` and use ordinal induction over that well-order. Here we can let `I` be
the set of clopen subsets of `S` since `S` is totally separated.
The above means it suffices to prove the following statement: For a closed subset `C` of `I → Bool`,
the `ℤ`-module `LocallyConstant C ℤ` is free.
For `i : I`, let `e C i : LocallyConstant C ℤ` denote the map `fun f ↦ (if f.val i then 1 else 0)`.
The basis will consist of products `e C iᵣ * ⋯ * e C i₁` with `iᵣ > ⋯ > i₁` which cannot be written
as linear combinations of lexicographically smaller products. We call this set `GoodProducts C`
What is proved by ordinal induction is that this set is linearly independent. The fact that it
spans can be proved directly.
## References
- [scholze2019condensed], Theorem 5.4.
-/
universe u
namespace Profinite
namespace NobelingProof
variable {I : Type u} [LinearOrder I] [IsWellOrder I (·<·)] (C : Set (I → Bool))
open Profinite ContinuousMap CategoryTheory Limits Opposite Submodule
section Projections
/-!
## Projection maps
The purpose of this section is twofold.
Firstly, in the proof that the set `GoodProducts C` spans the whole module `LocallyConstant C ℤ`,
we need to project `C` down to finite discrete subsets and write `C` as a cofiltered limit of those.
Secondly, in the inductive argument, we need to project `C` down to "smaller" sets satisfying the
inductive hypothesis.
In this section we define the relevant projection maps and prove some compatibility results.
### Main definitions
* Let `J : I → Prop`. Then `Proj J : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool)` is the projection mapping everything
that satisfies `J i` to itself, and everything else to `false`.
* The image of `C` under `Proj J` is denoted `π C J` and the corresponding map `C → π C J` is called
`ProjRestrict`. If `J` implies `K` we have a map `ProjRestricts : π C K → π C J`.
* `spanCone_isLimit` establishes that when `C` is compact, it can be written as a limit of its
images under the maps `Proj (· ∈ s)` where `s : Finset I`.
-/
variable (J K L : I → Prop) [∀ i, Decidable (J i)] [∀ i, Decidable (K i)] [∀ i, Decidable (L i)]
/--
The projection mapping everything that satisfies `J i` to itself, and everything else to `false`
-/
def Proj : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool) :=
fun c i ↦ if J i then c i else false
@[simp]
theorem continuous_proj :
Continuous (Proj J : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool)) := by
dsimp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [Proj]
apply continuous_pi
intro i
split
· apply continuous_apply
· apply continuous_const
/-- The image of `Proj π J` -/
def π : Set (I → Bool) := (Proj J) '' C
/-- The restriction of `Proj π J` to a subset, mapping to its image. -/
@[simps!]
def ProjRestrict : C → π C J :=
Set.MapsTo.restrict (Proj J) _ _ (Set.mapsTo_image _ _)
@[simp]
theorem continuous_projRestrict : Continuous (ProjRestrict C J) :=
Continuous.restrict _ (continuous_proj _)
theorem proj_eq_self {x : I → Bool} (h : ∀ i, x i ≠ false → J i) : Proj J x = x := by
ext i
simp only [Proj, ite_eq_left_iff]
contrapose!
simpa only [ne_comm] using h i
theorem proj_prop_eq_self (hh : ∀ i x, x ∈ C → x i ≠ false → J i) : π C J = C := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun ⟨y, hy, h⟩ ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨x, h, ?_⟩⟩
· rwa [← h, proj_eq_self]; exact (hh · y hy)
· rw [proj_eq_self]; exact (hh · x h)
theorem proj_comp_of_subset (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : (Proj J ∘ Proj K) =
(Proj J : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool)) := by
ext x i; dsimp [Proj]; aesop
theorem proj_eq_of_subset (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : π (π C K) J = π C J := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨y, ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ := h
refine ⟨z, hz, (?_ : _ = (Proj J ∘ Proj K) z)⟩
rw [proj_comp_of_subset J K h]
· obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := h
dsimp [π]
rw [← Set.image_comp]
refine ⟨y, hy, ?_⟩
rw [proj_comp_of_subset J K h]
variable {J K L}
/-- A variant of `ProjRestrict` with domain of the form `π C K` -/
@[simps!]
def ProjRestricts (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : π C K → π C J :=
Homeomorph.setCongr (proj_eq_of_subset C J K h) ∘ ProjRestrict (π C K) J
@[simp]
theorem continuous_projRestricts (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : Continuous (ProjRestricts C h) :=
Continuous.comp (Homeomorph.continuous _) (continuous_projRestrict _ _)
theorem surjective_projRestricts (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : Function.Surjective (ProjRestricts C h) :=
(Homeomorph.surjective _).comp (Set.surjective_mapsTo_image_restrict _ _)
variable (J) in
theorem projRestricts_eq_id : ProjRestricts C (fun i (h : J i) ↦ h) = id := by
ext ⟨x, y, hy, rfl⟩ i
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [π, Proj, ProjRestricts_coe, id_eq, if_true]
theorem projRestricts_eq_comp (hJK : ∀ i, J i → K i) (hKL : ∀ i, K i → L i) :
ProjRestricts C hJK ∘ ProjRestricts C hKL = ProjRestricts C (fun i ↦ hKL i ∘ hJK i) := by
ext x i
simp only [π, Proj, Function.comp_apply, ProjRestricts_coe]
aesop
theorem projRestricts_comp_projRestrict (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) :
ProjRestricts C h ∘ ProjRestrict C K = ProjRestrict C J := by
ext x i
simp only [π, Proj, Function.comp_apply, ProjRestricts_coe, ProjRestrict_coe]
aesop
variable (J)
/-- The objectwise map in the isomorphism `spanFunctor ≅ Profinite.indexFunctor`. -/
def iso_map : C(π C J, (IndexFunctor.obj C J)) :=
⟨fun x ↦ ⟨fun i ↦ x.val i.val, by
rcases x with ⟨x, y, hy, rfl⟩
refine ⟨y, hy, ?_⟩
ext ⟨i, hi⟩
simp [precomp, Proj, hi]⟩, by
refine Continuous.subtype_mk (continuous_pi fun i ↦ ?_) _
exact (continuous_apply i.val).comp continuous_subtype_val⟩
lemma iso_map_bijective : Function.Bijective (iso_map C J) := by
refine ⟨fun a b h ↦ ?_, fun a ↦ ?_⟩
· ext i
rw [Subtype.ext_iff] at h
by_cases hi : J i
· exact congr_fun h ⟨i, hi⟩
· rcases a with ⟨_, c, hc, rfl⟩
rcases b with ⟨_, d, hd, rfl⟩
simp only [Proj, if_neg hi]
· refine ⟨⟨fun i ↦ if hi : J i then a.val ⟨i, hi⟩ else false, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rcases a with ⟨_, y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
· ext i
exact dif_pos i.prop
variable {C} (hC : IsCompact C)
/--
For a given compact subset `C` of `I → Bool`, `spanFunctor` is the functor from the poset of finsets
of `I` to `Profinite`, sending a finite subset set `J` to the image of `C` under the projection
`Proj J`.
-/
noncomputable
def spanFunctor [∀ (s : Finset I) (i : I), Decidable (i ∈ s)] :
(Finset I)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Profinite.{u} where
obj s := @Profinite.of (π C (· ∈ (unop s))) _
(by rw [← isCompact_iff_compactSpace]; exact hC.image (continuous_proj _)) _ _
map h := ⟨(ProjRestricts C (leOfHom h.unop)), continuous_projRestricts _ _⟩
map_id J := by simp only [projRestricts_eq_id C (· ∈ (unop J))]; rfl
map_comp _ _ := by dsimp; congr; dsimp; rw [projRestricts_eq_comp]
/-- The limit cone on `spanFunctor` with point `C`. -/
noncomputable
def spanCone [∀ (s : Finset I) (i : I), Decidable (i ∈ s)] : Cone (spanFunctor hC) where
pt := @Profinite.of C _ (by rwa [← isCompact_iff_compactSpace]) _ _
π :=
{ app := fun s ↦ ⟨ProjRestrict C (· ∈ unop s), continuous_projRestrict _ _⟩
naturality := by
intro X Y h
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, Homeomorph.setCongr, Homeomorph.homeomorph_mk_coe,
Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, ← projRestricts_comp_projRestrict C
(leOfHom h.unop)]
rfl }
/-- `spanCone` is a limit cone. -/
noncomputable
def spanCone_isLimit [∀ (s : Finset I) (i : I), Decidable (i ∈ s)] :
CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit (spanCone hC) := by
refine (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (NatIso.ofComponents
(fun s ↦ (Profinite.isoOfBijective _ (iso_map_bijective C (· ∈ unop s)))) ?_) (spanCone hC))
(IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (indexCone_isLimit hC) (Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) ?_))
· intro ⟨s⟩ ⟨t⟩ ⟨⟨⟨f⟩⟩⟩
ext x
have : iso_map C (· ∈ t) ∘ ProjRestricts C f = IndexFunctor.map C f ∘ iso_map C (· ∈ s) := by
ext _ i; exact dif_pos i.prop
exact congr_fun this x
· intro ⟨s⟩
ext x
have : iso_map C (· ∈ s) ∘ ProjRestrict C (· ∈ s) = IndexFunctor.π_app C (· ∈ s) := by
ext _ i; exact dif_pos i.prop
erw [← this]
rfl
end Projections
section Products
/-!
## Defining the basis
Our proposed basis consists of products `e C iᵣ * ⋯ * e C i₁` with `iᵣ > ⋯ > i₁` which cannot be
written as linear combinations of lexicographically smaller products. See below for the definition
of `e`.
### Main definitions
* For `i : I`, we let `e C i : LocallyConstant C ℤ` denote the map
`fun f ↦ (if f.val i then 1 else 0)`.
* `Products I` is the type of lists of decreasing elements of `I`, so a typical element is
`[i₁, i₂,..., iᵣ]` with `i₁ > i₂ > ... > iᵣ`.
* `Products.eval C` is the `C`-evaluation of a list. It takes a term `[i₁, i₂,..., iᵣ] : Products I`
and returns the actual product `e C i₁ ··· e C iᵣ : LocallyConstant C ℤ`.
* `GoodProducts C` is the set of `Products I` such that their `C`-evaluation cannot be written as
a linear combination of evaluations of lexicographically smaller lists.
### Main results
* `Products.evalFacProp` and `Products.evalFacProps` establish the fact that `Products.eval`
interacts nicely with the projection maps from the previous section.
* `GoodProducts.span_iff_products`: the good products span `LocallyConstant C ℤ` iff all the
products span `LocallyConstant C ℤ`.
-/
/--
`e C i` is the locally constant map from `C : Set (I → Bool)` to `ℤ` sending `f` to 1 if
`f.val i = true`, and 0 otherwise.
-/
def e (i : I) : LocallyConstant C ℤ where
toFun := fun f ↦ (if f.val i then 1 else 0)
isLocallyConstant := by
rw [IsLocallyConstant.iff_continuous]
exact (continuous_of_discreteTopology (f := fun (a : Bool) ↦ (if a then (1 : ℤ) else 0))).comp
((continuous_apply i).comp continuous_subtype_val)
/--
`Products I` is the type of lists of decreasing elements of `I`, so a typical element is
`[i₁, i₂, ...]` with `i₁ > i₂ > ...`. We order `Products I` lexicographically, so `[] < [i₁, ...]`,
and `[i₁, i₂, ...] < [j₁, j₂, ...]` if either `i₁ < j₁`, or `i₁ = j₁` and `[i₂, ...] < [j₂, ...]`.
Terms `m = [i₁, i₂, ..., iᵣ]` of this type will be used to represent products of the form
`e C i₁ ··· e C iᵣ : LocallyConstant C ℤ` . The function associated to `m` is `m.eval`.
-/
def Products (I : Type*) [LinearOrder I] := {l : List I // l.Chain' (·>·)}
namespace Products
instance : LinearOrder (Products I) :=
inferInstanceAs (LinearOrder {l : List I // l.Chain' (·>·)})
@[simp]
theorem lt_iff_lex_lt (l m : Products I) : l < m ↔ List.Lex (·<·) l.val m.val := by
cases l; cases m; rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk]; exact Iff.rfl
instance : IsWellFounded (Products I) (·<·) := by
have : (· < · : Products I → _ → _) = (fun l m ↦ List.Lex (·<·) l.val m.val) := by
ext; exact lt_iff_lex_lt _ _
rw [this]
dsimp [Products]
rw [(by rfl : (·>· : I → _) = flip (·<·))]
infer_instance
/-- The evaluation `e C i₁ ··· e C iᵣ : C → ℤ` of a formal product `[i₁, i₂, ..., iᵣ]`. -/
def eval (l : Products I) := (l.1.map (e C)).prod
/--
The predicate on products which we prove picks out a basis of `LocallyConstant C ℤ`. We call such a
product "good".
-/
def isGood (l : Products I) : Prop :=
l.eval C ∉ Submodule.span ℤ ((Products.eval C) '' {m | m < l})
theorem rel_head!_of_mem [Inhabited I] {i : I} {l : Products I} (hi : i ∈ l.val) :
i ≤ l.val.head! :=
List.Sorted.le_head! (List.chain'_iff_pairwise.mp l.prop) hi
theorem head!_le_of_lt [Inhabited I] {q l : Products I} (h : q < l) (hq : q.val ≠ []) :
q.val.head! ≤ l.val.head! :=
List.head!_le_of_lt l.val q.val h hq
end Products
/-- The set of good products. -/
def GoodProducts := {l : Products I | l.isGood C}
namespace GoodProducts
/-- Evaluation of good products. -/
def eval (l : {l : Products I // l.isGood C}) : LocallyConstant C ℤ :=
Products.eval C l.1
theorem injective : Function.Injective (eval C) := by
intro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h
dsimp [eval] at h
rcases lt_trichotomy a b with (h'|rfl|h')
· exfalso; apply hb; rw [← h]
exact Submodule.subset_span ⟨a, h', rfl⟩
· rfl
· exfalso; apply ha; rw [h]
exact Submodule.subset_span ⟨b, ⟨h',rfl⟩⟩
/-- The image of the good products in the module `LocallyConstant C ℤ`. -/
def range := Set.range (GoodProducts.eval C)
/-- The type of good products is equivalent to its image. -/
noncomputable
def equiv_range : GoodProducts C ≃ range C :=
Equiv.ofInjective (eval C) (injective C)
theorem equiv_toFun_eq_eval : (equiv_range C).toFun = Set.rangeFactorization (eval C) := rfl
theorem linearIndependent_iff_range : LinearIndependent ℤ (GoodProducts.eval C) ↔
LinearIndependent ℤ (fun (p : range C) ↦ p.1) := by
rw [← @Set.rangeFactorization_eq _ _ (GoodProducts.eval C), ← equiv_toFun_eq_eval C]
exact linearIndependent_equiv (equiv_range C)
end GoodProducts
namespace Products
theorem eval_eq (l : Products I) (x : C) :
l.eval C x = if ∀ i, i ∈ l.val → (x.val i = true) then 1 else 0 := by
change LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom x (l.eval C) = _
rw [eval, map_list_prod]
split_ifs with h
· simp only [List.map_map]
apply List.prod_eq_one
simp only [List.mem_map, Function.comp_apply]
rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
exact if_pos (h i hi)
· simp only [List.map_map, List.prod_eq_zero_iff, List.mem_map, Function.comp_apply]
push_neg at h
convert h with i
dsimp [LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom, e]
simp only [ite_eq_right_iff, one_ne_zero]
theorem evalFacProp {l : Products I} (J : I → Prop)
(h : ∀ a, a ∈ l.val → J a) [∀ j, Decidable (J j)] :
l.eval (π C J) ∘ ProjRestrict C J = l.eval C := by
ext x
dsimp [ProjRestrict]
rw [Products.eval_eq, Products.eval_eq]
congr
apply forall_congr; intro i
apply forall_congr; intro hi
simp [h i hi, Proj]
theorem evalFacProps {l : Products I} (J K : I → Prop)
(h : ∀ a, a ∈ l.val → J a) [∀ j, Decidable (J j)] [∀ j, Decidable (K j)]
(hJK : ∀ i, J i → K i) :
l.eval (π C J) ∘ ProjRestricts C hJK = l.eval (π C K) := by
have : l.eval (π C J) ∘ Homeomorph.setCongr (proj_eq_of_subset C J K hJK) =
l.eval (π (π C K) J) := by
ext; simp [Homeomorph.setCongr, Products.eval_eq]
rw [ProjRestricts, ← Function.comp.assoc, this, ← evalFacProp (π C K) J h]
theorem prop_of_isGood {l : Products I} (J : I → Prop) [∀ j, Decidable (J j)]
(h : l.isGood (π C J)) : ∀ a, a ∈ l.val → J a := by
intro i hi
by_contra h'
apply h
suffices eval (π C J) l = 0 by
rw [this]
exact Submodule.zero_mem _
ext ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩
rw [eval_eq, if_neg fun h ↦ ?_, LocallyConstant.zero_apply]
simpa [Proj, h'] using h i hi
end Products
/-- The good products span `LocallyConstant C ℤ` if and only all the products do. -/
theorem GoodProducts.span_iff_products : ⊤ ≤ span ℤ (Set.range (eval C)) ↔
⊤ ≤ span ℤ (Set.range (Products.eval C)) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ le_trans h (span_mono (fun a ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨b.val, hb⟩)), fun h ↦ le_trans h ?_⟩
rw [span_le]
rintro f ⟨l, rfl⟩
let L : Products I → Prop := fun m ↦ m.eval C ∈ span ℤ (Set.range (GoodProducts.eval C))
suffices L l by assumption
apply IsWellFounded.induction (·<· : Products I → Products I → Prop)
intro l h
dsimp
by_cases hl : l.isGood C
· apply subset_span
exact ⟨⟨l, hl⟩, rfl⟩
· simp only [Products.isGood, not_not] at hl
suffices Products.eval C '' {m | m < l} ⊆ span ℤ (Set.range (GoodProducts.eval C)) by
rw [← span_le] at this
exact this hl
rintro a ⟨m, hm, rfl⟩
exact h m hm
end Products
section Span
/-!
## The good products span
Most of the argument is developing an API for `π C (· ∈ s)` when `s : Finset I`; then the image
of `C` is finite with the discrete topology. In this case, there is a direct argument that the good
products span. The general result is deduced from this.
### Main theorems
* `GoodProducts.spanFin` : The good products span the locally constant functions on `π C (· ∈ s)`
if `s` is finite.
* `GoodProducts.span` : The good products span `LocallyConstant C ℤ` for every closed subset `C`.
-/
section Fin
variable (s : Finset I)
/-- The `ℤ`-linear map induced by precomposition of the projection `C → π C (· ∈ s)`. -/
noncomputable
def πJ : LocallyConstant (π C (· ∈ s)) ℤ →ₗ[ℤ] LocallyConstant C ℤ :=
LocallyConstant.comapₗ ℤ ⟨_, (continuous_projRestrict C (· ∈ s))⟩
theorem eval_eq_πJ (l : Products I) (hl : l.isGood (π C (· ∈ s))) :
l.eval C = πJ C s (l.eval (π C (· ∈ s))) := by
ext f
simp only [πJ, LocallyConstant.comapₗ, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
(continuous_projRestrict C (· ∈ s)), LocallyConstant.coe_comap, Function.comp_apply]
exact (congr_fun (Products.evalFacProp C (· ∈ s) (Products.prop_of_isGood C (· ∈ s) hl)) _).symm
/-- `π C (· ∈ s)` is finite for a finite set `s`. -/
noncomputable
instance : Fintype (π C (· ∈ s)) := by
let f : π C (· ∈ s) → (s → Bool) := fun x j ↦ x.val j.val
refine Fintype.ofInjective f ?_
intro ⟨_, x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨_, y, hy, rfl⟩ h
ext i
by_cases hi : i ∈ s
· exact congrFun h ⟨i, hi⟩
· simp only [Proj, if_neg hi]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The Kronecker delta as a locally constant map from `π C (· ∈ s)` to `ℤ`. -/
noncomputable
def spanFinBasis (x : π C (· ∈ s)) : LocallyConstant (π C (· ∈ s)) ℤ where
toFun := fun y ↦ if y = x then 1 else 0
isLocallyConstant :=
haveI : DiscreteTopology (π C (· ∈ s)) := discrete_of_t1_of_finite
IsLocallyConstant.of_discrete _
open scoped Classical in
theorem spanFinBasis.span : ⊤ ≤ Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range (spanFinBasis C s)) := by
intro f _
rw [Finsupp.mem_span_range_iff_exists_finsupp]
use Finsupp.onFinset (Finset.univ) f.toFun (fun _ _ ↦ Finset.mem_univ _)
ext x
change LocallyConstant.evalₗ ℤ x _ = _
simp only [zsmul_eq_mul, map_finsupp_sum, LocallyConstant.evalₗ_apply,
LocallyConstant.coe_mul, Pi.mul_apply, spanFinBasis, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, mul_ite, mul_one,
mul_zero, Finsupp.sum_ite_eq, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, ne_eq, ite_not]
split_ifs with h <;> [exact h.symm; rfl]
/--
A certain explicit list of locally constant maps. The theorem `factors_prod_eq_basis` shows that the
product of the elements in this list is the delta function `spanFinBasis C s x`.
-/
def factors (x : π C (· ∈ s)) : List (LocallyConstant (π C (· ∈ s)) ℤ) :=
List.map (fun i ↦ if x.val i = true then e (π C (· ∈ s)) i else (1 - (e (π C (· ∈ s)) i)))
(s.sort (·≥·))
theorem list_prod_apply (x : C) (l : List (LocallyConstant C ℤ)) :
l.prod x = (l.map (LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom x)).prod := by
rw [← map_list_prod (LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom x) l]
rfl
theorem factors_prod_eq_basis_of_eq {x y : (π C fun x ↦ x ∈ s)} (h : y = x) :
(factors C s x).prod y = 1 := by
rw [list_prod_apply (π C (· ∈ s)) y _]
apply List.prod_eq_one
simp only [h, List.mem_map, LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom, factors]
rintro _ ⟨a, ⟨b, _, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
dsimp
split_ifs with hh
· rw [e, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, if_pos hh]
· rw [LocallyConstant.sub_apply, e, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, if_neg hh]
simp only [LocallyConstant.toFun_eq_coe, LocallyConstant.coe_one, Pi.one_apply, sub_zero]
theorem e_mem_of_eq_true {x : (π C (· ∈ s))} {a : I} (hx : x.val a = true) :
e (π C (· ∈ s)) a ∈ factors C s x := by
rcases x with ⟨_, z, hz, rfl⟩
simp only [factors, List.mem_map, Finset.mem_sort]
refine ⟨a, ?_, if_pos hx⟩
aesop (add simp Proj)
theorem one_sub_e_mem_of_false {x y : (π C (· ∈ s))} {a : I} (ha : y.val a = true)
(hx : x.val a = false) : 1 - e (π C (· ∈ s)) a ∈ factors C s x := by
simp only [factors, List.mem_map, Finset.mem_sort]
use a
simp only [hx, ite_false, and_true]
rcases y with ⟨_, z, hz, rfl⟩
aesop (add simp Proj)
theorem factors_prod_eq_basis_of_ne {x y : (π C (· ∈ s))} (h : y ≠ x) :
(factors C s x).prod y = 0 := by
rw [list_prod_apply (π C (· ∈ s)) y _]
apply List.prod_eq_zero
simp only [List.mem_map]
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a, y.val a ≠ x.val a := by contrapose! h; ext; apply h
cases hx : x.val a
· rw [hx, ne_eq, Bool.not_eq_false] at ha
refine ⟨1 - (e (π C (· ∈ s)) a), ⟨one_sub_e_mem_of_false _ _ ha hx, ?_⟩⟩
rw [e, LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom_apply, LocallyConstant.sub_apply,
LocallyConstant.coe_one, Pi.one_apply, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, if_pos ha, sub_self]
· refine ⟨e (π C (· ∈ s)) a, ⟨e_mem_of_eq_true _ _ hx, ?_⟩⟩
rw [hx] at ha
rw [LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom_apply, e, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, if_neg ha]
/-- If `s` is finite, the product of the elements of the list `factors C s x`
is the delta function at `x`. -/
theorem factors_prod_eq_basis (x : π C (· ∈ s)) :
(factors C s x).prod = spanFinBasis C s x := by
ext y
dsimp [spanFinBasis]
split_ifs with h <;> [exact factors_prod_eq_basis_of_eq _ _ h;
exact factors_prod_eq_basis_of_ne _ _ h]
theorem GoodProducts.finsupp_sum_mem_span_eval {a : I} {as : List I}
(ha : List.Chain' (· > ·) (a :: as)) {c : Products I →₀ ℤ}
(hc : (c.support : Set (Products I)) ⊆ {m | m.val ≤ as}) :
(Finsupp.sum c fun a_1 b ↦ e (π C (· ∈ s)) a * b • Products.eval (π C (· ∈ s)) a_1) ∈
Submodule.span ℤ (Products.eval (π C (· ∈ s)) '' {m | m.val ≤ a :: as}) := by
apply Submodule.finsupp_sum_mem
intro m hm
have hsm := (LinearMap.mulLeft ℤ (e (π C (· ∈ s)) a)).map_smul
dsimp at hsm
rw [hsm]
apply Submodule.smul_mem
apply Submodule.subset_span
have hmas : m.val ≤ as := by
apply hc
simpa only [Finset.mem_coe, Finsupp.mem_support_iff] using hm
refine ⟨⟨a :: m.val, ha.cons_of_le m.prop hmas⟩, ⟨List.cons_le_cons a hmas, ?_⟩⟩
simp only [Products.eval, List.map, List.prod_cons]
/-- If `s` is a finite subset of `I`, then the good products span. -/
theorem GoodProducts.spanFin : ⊤ ≤ Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range (eval (π C (· ∈ s)))) := by
rw [span_iff_products]
refine le_trans (spanFinBasis.span C s) ?_
rw [Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [← factors_prod_eq_basis]
let l := s.sort (·≥·)
dsimp [factors]
suffices l.Chain' (·>·) → (l.map (fun i ↦ if x.val i = true then e (π C (· ∈ s)) i
else (1 - (e (π C (· ∈ s)) i)))).prod ∈
Submodule.span ℤ ((Products.eval (π C (· ∈ s))) '' {m | m.val ≤ l}) from
Submodule.span_mono (Set.image_subset_range _ _) (this (Finset.sort_sorted_gt _).chain')
induction l with
| nil =>
intro _
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact ⟨⟨[], List.chain'_nil⟩,⟨Or.inl rfl, rfl⟩⟩
| cons a as ih =>
rw [List.map_cons, List.prod_cons]
intro ha
specialize ih (by rw [List.chain'_cons'] at ha; exact ha.2)
rw [Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total] at ih
simp only [Finsupp.mem_supported, Finsupp.total_apply] at ih
obtain ⟨c, hc, hc'⟩ := ih
rw [← hc']; clear hc'
have hmap := fun g ↦ map_finsupp_sum (LinearMap.mulLeft ℤ (e (π C (· ∈ s)) a)) c g
dsimp at hmap ⊢
split_ifs
· rw [hmap]
exact finsupp_sum_mem_span_eval _ _ ha hc
· ring_nf
rw [hmap]
apply Submodule.add_mem
· apply Submodule.neg_mem
exact finsupp_sum_mem_span_eval _ _ ha hc
· apply Submodule.finsupp_sum_mem
intro m hm
apply Submodule.smul_mem
apply Submodule.subset_span
refine ⟨m, ⟨?_, rfl⟩⟩
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
have hmas : m.val ≤ as :=
hc (by simpa only [Finset.mem_coe, Finsupp.mem_support_iff] using hm)
refine le_trans hmas ?_
cases as with
| nil => exact (List.nil_lt_cons a []).le
| cons b bs =>
apply le_of_lt
rw [List.chain'_cons] at ha
have hlex := List.lt.head bs (b :: bs) ha.1
exact (List.lt_iff_lex_lt _ _).mp hlex
end Fin
theorem fin_comap_jointlySurjective
(hC : IsClosed C)
(f : LocallyConstant C ℤ) : ∃ (s : Finset I)
(g : LocallyConstant (π C (· ∈ s)) ℤ), f = g.comap ⟨(ProjRestrict C (· ∈ s)),
continuous_projRestrict _ _⟩ := by
obtain ⟨J, g, h⟩ := @Profinite.exists_locallyConstant.{0, u, u} (Finset I)ᵒᵖ _ _ _
(spanCone hC.isCompact) ℤ
(spanCone_isLimit hC.isCompact) f
exact ⟨(Opposite.unop J), g, h⟩
/-- The good products span all of `LocallyConstant C ℤ` if `C` is closed. -/
theorem GoodProducts.span (hC : IsClosed C) :
⊤ ≤ Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range (eval C)) := by
rw [span_iff_products]
intro f _
obtain ⟨K, f', rfl⟩ : ∃ K f', f = πJ C K f' := fin_comap_jointlySurjective C hC f
refine Submodule.span_mono ?_ <| Submodule.apply_mem_span_image_of_mem_span (πJ C K) <|
spanFin C K (Submodule.mem_top : f' ∈ ⊤)
rintro l ⟨y, ⟨m, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨m.val, eval_eq_πJ C K m.val m.prop⟩
end Span
section Ordinal
/-!
## Relating elements of the well-order `I` with ordinals
We choose a well-ordering on `I`. This amounts to regarding `I` as an ordinal, and as such it
can be regarded as the set of all strictly smaller ordinals, allowing to apply ordinal induction.
### Main definitions
* `ord I i` is the term `i` of `I` regarded as an ordinal.
* `term I ho` is a sufficiently small ordinal regarded as a term of `I`.
* `contained C o` is a predicate saying that `C` is "small" enough in relation to the ordinal `o`
to satisfy the inductive hypothesis.
* `P I` is the predicate on ordinals about linear independence of good products, which the rest of
this file is spent on proving by induction.
-/
variable (I)
/-- A term of `I` regarded as an ordinal. -/
def ord (i : I) : Ordinal := Ordinal.typein ((·<·) : I → I → Prop) i
/-- An ordinal regarded as a term of `I`. -/
noncomputable
def term {o : Ordinal} (ho : o < Ordinal.type ((·<·) : I → I → Prop)) : I :=
Ordinal.enum ((·<·) : I → I → Prop) o ho
variable {I}
theorem term_ord_aux {i : I} (ho : ord I i < Ordinal.type ((·<·) : I → I → Prop)) :
term I ho = i := by
simp only [term, ord, Ordinal.enum_typein]
@[simp]
theorem ord_term_aux {o : Ordinal} (ho : o < Ordinal.type ((·<·) : I → I → Prop)) :
ord I (term I ho) = o := by
simp only [ord, term, Ordinal.typein_enum]
theorem ord_term {o : Ordinal} (ho : o < Ordinal.type ((·<·) : I → I → Prop)) (i : I) :
ord I i = o ↔ term I ho = i := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· subst h
exact term_ord_aux ho
· subst h
exact ord_term_aux ho
/-- A predicate saying that `C` is "small" enough to satisfy the inductive hypothesis. -/
def contained (o : Ordinal) : Prop := ∀ f, f ∈ C → ∀ (i : I), f i = true → ord I i < o
variable (I) in
/--
The predicate on ordinals which we prove by induction, see `GoodProducts.P0`,
`GoodProducts.Plimit` and `GoodProducts.linearIndependentAux` in the section `Induction` below
-/
def P (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
o ≤ Ordinal.type (·<· : I → I → Prop) →
(∀ (C : Set (I → Bool)), IsClosed C → contained C o →
LinearIndependent ℤ (GoodProducts.eval C))
theorem Products.prop_of_isGood_of_contained {l : Products I} (o : Ordinal) (h : l.isGood C)
(hsC : contained C o) (i : I) (hi : i ∈ l.val) : ord I i < o := by
by_contra h'
apply h
suffices eval C l = 0 by simp [this, Submodule.zero_mem]
ext x
simp only [eval_eq, LocallyConstant.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, ite_eq_right_iff, one_ne_zero]
contrapose! h'
exact hsC x.val x.prop i (h'.1 i hi)
end Ordinal
section Zero
/-!
## The zero case of the induction
In this case, we have `contained C 0` which means that `C` is either empty or a singleton.
-/
instance : Subsingleton (LocallyConstant (∅ : Set (I → Bool)) ℤ) :=
subsingleton_iff.mpr (fun _ _ ↦ LocallyConstant.ext isEmptyElim)
instance : IsEmpty { l // Products.isGood (∅ : Set (I → Bool)) l } :=
isEmpty_iff.mpr fun ⟨l, hl⟩ ↦ hl <| by
rw [subsingleton_iff.mp inferInstance (Products.eval ∅ l) 0]
exact Submodule.zero_mem _
theorem GoodProducts.linearIndependentEmpty :
LinearIndependent ℤ (eval (∅ : Set (I → Bool))) := linearIndependent_empty_type
/-- The empty list as a `Products` -/
def Products.nil : Products I := ⟨[], by simp only [List.chain'_nil]⟩
theorem Products.lt_nil_empty : { m : Products I | m < Products.nil } = ∅ := by
ext ⟨m, hm⟩
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by tauto⟩
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, lt_iff_lex_lt, nil, List.Lex.not_nil_right] at h
instance {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (LocallyConstant α ℤ) :=
⟨0, 1, ne_of_apply_ne DFunLike.coe <| (Function.const_injective (β := ℤ)).ne zero_ne_one⟩
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem Products.isGood_nil : Products.isGood ({fun _ ↦ false} : Set (I → Bool)) Products.nil := by
intro h
simp only [Products.lt_nil_empty, Products.eval, List.map, List.prod_nil, Set.image_empty,
Submodule.span_empty, Submodule.mem_bot, one_ne_zero] at h
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem Products.span_nil_eq_top :
Submodule.span ℤ (eval ({fun _ ↦ false} : Set (I → Bool)) '' {nil}) = ⊤ := by
rw [Set.image_singleton, eq_top_iff]
intro f _
rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
refine ⟨f default, ?_⟩
simp only [eval, List.map, List.prod_nil, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_one]
ext x
obtain rfl : x = default := by simp only [Set.default_coe_singleton, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rfl
/-- There is a unique `GoodProducts` for the singleton `{fun _ ↦ false}`. -/
noncomputable
instance : Unique { l // Products.isGood ({fun _ ↦ false} : Set (I → Bool)) l } where
default := ⟨Products.nil, Products.isGood_nil⟩
uniq := by
intro ⟨⟨l, hl⟩, hll⟩
ext
apply Subtype.ext
apply (List.Lex.nil_left_or_eq_nil l (r := (·<·))).resolve_left
intro _
apply hll
have he : {Products.nil} ⊆ {m | m < ⟨l,hl⟩} := by
simpa only [Products.nil, Products.lt_iff_lex_lt, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
apply Submodule.span_mono (Set.image_subset _ he)
rw [Products.span_nil_eq_top]
exact Submodule.mem_top
instance (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] : NoZeroSMulDivisors ℤ (LocallyConstant α ℤ) := by
constructor
intro c f h
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
intro hc
ext x
apply mul_right_injective₀ hc
simp [LocallyConstant.ext_iff] at h ⊢
exact h x
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem GoodProducts.linearIndependentSingleton :
LinearIndependent ℤ (eval ({fun _ ↦ false} : Set (I → Bool))) := by
refine linearIndependent_unique (eval ({fun _ ↦ false} : Set (I → Bool))) ?_
simp only [eval, Products.eval, List.map, List.prod_nil, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
end Zero
section Maps
/-!
## `ℤ`-linear maps induced by projections
We define injective `ℤ`-linear maps between modules of the form `LocallyConstant C ℤ` induced by
precomposition with the projections defined in the section `Projections`.
### Main definitions
* `πs` and `πs'` are the `ℤ`-linear maps corresponding to `ProjRestrict` and `ProjRestricts`
respectively.
### Main result
* We prove that `πs` and `πs'` interact well with `Products.eval` and the main application is the
theorem `isGood_mono` which says that the property `isGood` is "monotone" on ordinals.
-/
theorem contained_eq_proj (o : Ordinal) (h : contained C o) :
C = π C (ord I · < o) := by
have := proj_prop_eq_self C (ord I · < o)
simp [π, Bool.not_eq_false] at this
exact (this (fun i x hx ↦ h x hx i)).symm
theorem isClosed_proj (o : Ordinal) (hC : IsClosed C) : IsClosed (π C (ord I · < o)) :=
(continuous_proj (ord I · < o)).isClosedMap C hC
theorem contained_proj (o : Ordinal) : contained (π C (ord I · < o)) o := by
intro x ⟨_, _, h⟩ j hj
aesop (add simp Proj)
/-- The `ℤ`-linear map induced by precomposition of the projection `C → π C (ord I · < o)`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable
def πs (o : Ordinal) : LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o)) ℤ →ₗ[ℤ] LocallyConstant C ℤ :=
LocallyConstant.comapₗ ℤ ⟨(ProjRestrict C (ord I · < o)), (continuous_projRestrict _ _)⟩
theorem coe_πs (o : Ordinal) (f : LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o)) ℤ) :
πs C o f = f ∘ ProjRestrict C (ord I · < o) := by
rfl
theorem injective_πs (o : Ordinal) : Function.Injective (πs C o) :=
LocallyConstant.comap_injective ⟨_, (continuous_projRestrict _ _)⟩
(Set.surjective_mapsTo_image_restrict _ _)
/-- The `ℤ`-linear map induced by precomposition of the projection
`π C (ord I · < o₂) → π C (ord I · < o₁)` for `o₁ ≤ o₂`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable
def πs' {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h : o₁ ≤ o₂) :
LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o₁)) ℤ →ₗ[ℤ] LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o₂)) ℤ :=
LocallyConstant.comapₗ ℤ ⟨(ProjRestricts C (fun _ hh ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hh h)),
(continuous_projRestricts _ _)⟩
theorem coe_πs' {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h : o₁ ≤ o₂) (f : LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o₁)) ℤ) :
(πs' C h f).toFun = f.toFun ∘ (ProjRestricts C (fun _ hh ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hh h)) := by
rfl
theorem injective_πs' {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h : o₁ ≤ o₂) : Function.Injective (πs' C h) :=
LocallyConstant.comap_injective ⟨_, (continuous_projRestricts _ _)⟩
(surjective_projRestricts _ fun _ hi ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hi h)
namespace Products
theorem lt_ord_of_lt {l m : Products I} {o : Ordinal} (h₁ : m < l)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ l.val, ord I i < o) : ∀ i ∈ m.val, ord I i < o :=
List.Sorted.lt_ord_of_lt (List.chain'_iff_pairwise.mp l.2) (List.chain'_iff_pairwise.mp m.2) h₁ h₂
theorem eval_πs {l : Products I} {o : Ordinal} (hlt : ∀ i ∈ l.val, ord I i < o) :
πs C o (l.eval (π C (ord I · < o))) = l.eval C := by
simpa only [← LocallyConstant.coe_inj] using evalFacProp C (ord I · < o) hlt
theorem eval_πs' {l : Products I} {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h : o₁ ≤ o₂)
(hlt : ∀ i ∈ l.val, ord I i < o₁) :
πs' C h (l.eval (π C (ord I · < o₁))) = l.eval (π C (ord I · < o₂)) := by
rw [← LocallyConstant.coe_inj, ← LocallyConstant.toFun_eq_coe]
exact evalFacProps C (fun (i : I) ↦ ord I i < o₁) (fun (i : I) ↦ ord I i < o₂) hlt
(fun _ hh ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hh h)
theorem eval_πs_image {l : Products I} {o : Ordinal}
(hl : ∀ i ∈ l.val, ord I i < o) : eval C '' { m | m < l } =
(πs C o) '' (eval (π C (ord I · < o)) '' { m | m < l }) := by
ext f
simp only [Set.mem_image, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
apply exists_congr; intro m
apply and_congr_right; intro hm
rw [eval_πs C (lt_ord_of_lt hm hl)]
theorem eval_πs_image' {l : Products I} {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h : o₁ ≤ o₂)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ l.val, ord I i < o₁) : eval (π C (ord I · < o₂)) '' { m | m < l } =
(πs' C h) '' (eval (π C (ord I · < o₁)) '' { m | m < l }) := by
ext f
simp only [Set.mem_image, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
apply exists_congr; intro m
apply and_congr_right; intro hm
rw [eval_πs' C h (lt_ord_of_lt hm hl)]
theorem head_lt_ord_of_isGood [Inhabited I] {l : Products I} {o : Ordinal}
(h : l.isGood (π C (ord I · < o))) (hn : l.val ≠ []) : ord I (l.val.head!) < o :=
prop_of_isGood C (ord I · < o) h l.val.head! (List.head!_mem_self hn)
/--
If `l` is good w.r.t. `π C (ord I · < o₁)` and `o₁ ≤ o₂`, then it is good w.r.t.
`π C (ord I · < o₂)`
-/
theorem isGood_mono {l : Products I} {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h : o₁ ≤ o₂)
(hl : l.isGood (π C (ord I · < o₁))) : l.isGood (π C (ord I · < o₂)) := by
intro hl'
apply hl
rwa [eval_πs_image' C h (prop_of_isGood C _ hl), ← eval_πs' C h (prop_of_isGood C _ hl),
Submodule.apply_mem_span_image_iff_mem_span (injective_πs' C h)] at hl'
end Products
end Maps
section Limit
/-!
## The limit case of the induction
We relate linear independence in `LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o')) ℤ` with linear independence
in `LocallyConstant C ℤ`, where `contained C o` and `o' < o`.
When `o` is a limit ordinal, we prove that the good products in `LocallyConstant C ℤ` are linearly
independent if and only if a certain directed union is linearly independent. Each term in this
directed union is in bijection with the good products w.r.t. `π C (ord I · < o')` for an ordinal
`o' < o`, and these are linearly independent by the inductive hypothesis.
### Main definitions
* `GoodProducts.smaller` is the image of good products coming from a smaller ordinal.
* `GoodProducts.range_equiv`: The image of the `GoodProducts` in `C` is equivalent to the union of
`smaller C o'` over all ordinals `o' < o`.
### Main results
* `Products.limitOrdinal`: for `o` a limit ordinal such that `contained C o`, a product `l` is good
w.r.t. `C` iff it there exists an ordinal `o' < o` such that `l` is good w.r.t.
`π C (ord I · < o')`.
* `GoodProducts.linearIndependent_iff_union_smaller` is the result mentioned above, that the good
products are linearly independent iff a directed union is.
-/
namespace GoodProducts
/--
The image of the `GoodProducts` for `π C (ord I · < o)` in `LocallyConstant C ℤ`. The name `smaller`
refers to the setting in which we will use this, when we are mapping in `GoodProducts` from a
smaller set, i.e. when `o` is a smaller ordinal than the one `C` is "contained" in.
-/
def smaller (o : Ordinal) : Set (LocallyConstant C ℤ) :=
(πs C o) '' (range (π C (ord I · < o)))
/--
The map from the image of the `GoodProducts` in `LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o)) ℤ` to
`smaller C o`
-/
noncomputable
def range_equiv_smaller_toFun (o : Ordinal) (x : range (π C (ord I · < o))) : smaller C o :=
⟨πs C o ↑x, x.val, x.property, rfl⟩
theorem range_equiv_smaller_toFun_bijective (o : Ordinal) :
Function.Bijective (range_equiv_smaller_toFun C o) := by
dsimp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [range_equiv_smaller_toFun]
refine ⟨fun a b hab ↦ ?_, fun ⟨a, b, hb⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· ext1
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq] at hab
exact injective_πs C o hab
· use ⟨b, hb.1⟩
simpa only [Subtype.mk.injEq] using hb.2
/--
The equivalence from the image of the `GoodProducts` in `LocallyConstant (π C (ord I · < o)) ℤ` to
`smaller C o`
-/
noncomputable
def range_equiv_smaller (o : Ordinal) : range (π C (ord I · < o)) ≃ smaller C o :=
Equiv.ofBijective (range_equiv_smaller_toFun C o) (range_equiv_smaller_toFun_bijective C o)
theorem smaller_factorization (o : Ordinal) :
(fun (p : smaller C o) ↦ p.1) ∘ (range_equiv_smaller C o).toFun =
(πs C o) ∘ (fun (p : range (π C (ord I · < o))) ↦ p.1) := by rfl
theorem linearIndependent_iff_smaller (o : Ordinal) :
LinearIndependent ℤ (GoodProducts.eval (π C (ord I · < o))) ↔
LinearIndependent ℤ (fun (p : smaller C o) ↦ p.1) := by
rw [GoodProducts.linearIndependent_iff_range,
← LinearMap.linearIndependent_iff (πs C o)
(LinearMap.ker_eq_bot_of_injective (injective_πs _ _)), ← smaller_factorization C o]
exact linearIndependent_equiv _
theorem smaller_mono {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} (h : o₁ ≤ o₂) : smaller C o₁ ⊆ smaller C o₂ := by
rintro f ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩
simp only [smaller, Set.mem_image]
use πs' C h g
obtain ⟨⟨l, gl⟩, rfl⟩ := hg
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· use ⟨l, Products.isGood_mono C h gl⟩
ext x
rw [eval, ← Products.eval_πs' _ h (Products.prop_of_isGood C _ gl), eval]
· rw [← LocallyConstant.coe_inj, coe_πs C o₂, ← LocallyConstant.toFun_eq_coe, coe_πs',
Function.comp.assoc, projRestricts_comp_projRestrict C _, coe_πs]
rfl
end GoodProducts
variable {o : Ordinal} (ho : o.IsLimit) (hsC : contained C o)
theorem Products.limitOrdinal (l : Products I) : l.isGood (π C (ord I · < o)) ↔
∃ (o' : Ordinal), o' < o ∧ l.isGood (π C (ord I · < o')) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨o', ⟨ho', hl⟩⟩ ↦ isGood_mono C (le_of_lt ho') hl⟩
use Finset.sup l.val.toFinset (fun a ↦ Order.succ (ord I a))
have ha : ⊥ < o := by rw [Ordinal.bot_eq_zero, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]; exact ho.1
have hslt : Finset.sup l.val.toFinset (fun a ↦ Order.succ (ord I a)) < o := by
simp only [Finset.sup_lt_iff ha, List.mem_toFinset]
exact fun b hb ↦ ho.2 _ (prop_of_isGood C (ord I · < o) h b hb)
refine ⟨hslt, fun he ↦ h ?_⟩
have hlt : ∀ i ∈ l.val, ord I i < Finset.sup l.val.toFinset (fun a ↦ Order.succ (ord I a)) := by
intro i hi
simp only [Finset.lt_sup_iff, List.mem_toFinset, Order.lt_succ_iff]
exact ⟨i, hi, le_rfl⟩
rwa [eval_πs_image' C (le_of_lt hslt) hlt, ← eval_πs' C (le_of_lt hslt) hlt,
Submodule.apply_mem_span_image_iff_mem_span (injective_πs' C _)]
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/Nobeling.lean | 1,062 | 1,074 | theorem GoodProducts.union : range C = ⋃ (e : {o' // o' < o}), (smaller C e.val) := by |
ext p
simp only [smaller, range, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_range, Subtype.exists]
refine ⟨fun hp ↦ ?_, fun hp ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩ := hp
rw [contained_eq_proj C o hsC, Products.limitOrdinal C ho] at hl
obtain ⟨o', ho'⟩ := hl
refine ⟨o', ho'.1, eval (π C (ord I · < o')) ⟨l, ho'.2⟩, ⟨l, ho'.2, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
exact Products.eval_πs C (Products.prop_of_isGood C _ ho'.2)
· obtain ⟨o', h, _, ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ := hp
refine ⟨l, ?_, (Products.eval_πs C (Products.prop_of_isGood C _ hl)).symm⟩
rw [contained_eq_proj C o hsC]
exact Products.isGood_mono C (le_of_lt h) hl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PartialSups
#align_import order.disjointed from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
/-!
# Consecutive differences of sets
This file defines the way to make a sequence of elements into a sequence of disjoint elements with
the same partial sups.
For a sequence `f : ℕ → α`, this new sequence will be `f 0`, `f 1 \ f 0`, `f 2 \ (f 0 ⊔ f 1)`.
It is actually unique, as `disjointed_unique` shows.
## Main declarations
* `disjointed f`: The sequence `f 0`, `f 1 \ f 0`, `f 2 \ (f 0 ⊔ f 1)`, ....
* `partialSups_disjointed`: `disjointed f` has the same partial sups as `f`.
* `disjoint_disjointed`: The elements of `disjointed f` are pairwise disjoint.
* `disjointed_unique`: `disjointed f` is the only pairwise disjoint sequence having the same partial
sups as `f`.
* `iSup_disjointed`: `disjointed f` has the same supremum as `f`. Limiting case of
`partialSups_disjointed`.
We also provide set notation variants of some lemmas.
## TODO
Find a useful statement of `disjointedRec_succ`.
One could generalize `disjointed` to any locally finite bot preorder domain, in place of `ℕ`.
Related to the TODO in the module docstring of `Mathlib.Order.PartialSups`.
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
/-- If `f : ℕ → α` is a sequence of elements, then `disjointed f` is the sequence formed by
subtracting each element from the nexts. This is the unique disjoint sequence whose partial sups
are the same as the original sequence. -/
def disjointed (f : ℕ → α) : ℕ → α
| 0 => f 0
| n + 1 => f (n + 1) \ partialSups f n
#align disjointed disjointed
@[simp]
theorem disjointed_zero (f : ℕ → α) : disjointed f 0 = f 0 :=
rfl
#align disjointed_zero disjointed_zero
theorem disjointed_succ (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : disjointed f (n + 1) = f (n + 1) \ partialSups f n :=
rfl
#align disjointed_succ disjointed_succ
theorem disjointed_le_id : disjointed ≤ (id : (ℕ → α) → ℕ → α) := by
rintro f n
cases n
· rfl
· exact sdiff_le
#align disjointed_le_id disjointed_le_id
theorem disjointed_le (f : ℕ → α) : disjointed f ≤ f :=
disjointed_le_id f
#align disjointed_le disjointed_le
theorem disjoint_disjointed (f : ℕ → α) : Pairwise (Disjoint on disjointed f) := by
refine (Symmetric.pairwise_on Disjoint.symm _).2 fun m n h => ?_
cases n
· exact (Nat.not_lt_zero _ h).elim
exact
disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left
((disjointed_le f m).trans (le_partialSups_of_le f (Nat.lt_add_one_iff.1 h)))
#align disjoint_disjointed disjoint_disjointed
-- Porting note: `disjointedRec` had a change in universe level.
/-- An induction principle for `disjointed`. To define/prove something on `disjointed f n`, it's
enough to define/prove it for `f n` and being able to extend through diffs. -/
def disjointedRec {f : ℕ → α} {p : α → Sort*} (hdiff : ∀ ⦃t i⦄, p t → p (t \ f i)) :
∀ ⦃n⦄, p (f n) → p (disjointed f n)
| 0 => id
| n + 1 => fun h => by
suffices H : ∀ k, p (f (n + 1) \ partialSups f k) from H n
rintro k
induction' k with k ih
· exact hdiff h
rw [partialSups_succ, ← sdiff_sdiff_left]
exact hdiff ih
#align disjointed_rec disjointedRec
@[simp]
theorem disjointedRec_zero {f : ℕ → α} {p : α → Sort*} (hdiff : ∀ ⦃t i⦄, p t → p (t \ f i))
(h₀ : p (f 0)) : disjointedRec hdiff h₀ = h₀ :=
rfl
#align disjointed_rec_zero disjointedRec_zero
-- TODO: Find a useful statement of `disjointedRec_succ`.
protected lemma Monotone.disjointed_succ {f : ℕ → α} (hf : Monotone f) (n : ℕ) :
disjointed f (n + 1) = f (n + 1) \ f n := by rw [disjointed_succ, hf.partialSups_eq]
#align monotone.disjointed_eq Monotone.disjointed_succ
protected lemma Monotone.disjointed_succ_sup {f : ℕ → α} (hf : Monotone f) (n : ℕ) :
disjointed f (n + 1) ⊔ f n = f (n + 1) := by
rw [hf.disjointed_succ, sdiff_sup_cancel]; exact hf n.le_succ
@[simp]
theorem partialSups_disjointed (f : ℕ → α) : partialSups (disjointed f) = partialSups f := by
ext n
induction' n with k ih
· rw [partialSups_zero, partialSups_zero, disjointed_zero]
· rw [partialSups_succ, partialSups_succ, disjointed_succ, ih, sup_sdiff_self_right]
#align partial_sups_disjointed partialSups_disjointed
/-- `disjointed f` is the unique sequence that is pairwise disjoint and has the same partial sups
as `f`. -/
theorem disjointed_unique {f d : ℕ → α} (hdisj : Pairwise (Disjoint on d))
(hsups : partialSups d = partialSups f) : d = disjointed f := by
ext n
cases' n with n
· rw [← partialSups_zero d, hsups, partialSups_zero, disjointed_zero]
suffices h : d n.succ = partialSups d n.succ \ partialSups d n by
rw [h, hsups, partialSups_succ, disjointed_succ, sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
rw [partialSups_succ, sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, eq_comm, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint]
suffices h : ∀ m ≤ n, Disjoint (partialSups d m) (d n.succ) from h n le_rfl
rintro m hm
induction' m with m ih
· exact hdisj (Nat.succ_ne_zero _).symm
rw [partialSups_succ, disjoint_iff, inf_sup_right, sup_eq_bot_iff, ← disjoint_iff, ← disjoint_iff]
exact ⟨ih (Nat.le_of_succ_le hm), hdisj (Nat.lt_succ_of_le hm).ne⟩
#align disjointed_unique disjointed_unique
end GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
section CompleteBooleanAlgebra
variable [CompleteBooleanAlgebra α]
theorem iSup_disjointed (f : ℕ → α) : ⨆ n, disjointed f n = ⨆ n, f n :=
iSup_eq_iSup_of_partialSups_eq_partialSups (partialSups_disjointed f)
#align supr_disjointed iSup_disjointed
| Mathlib/Order/Disjointed.lean | 149 | 157 | theorem disjointed_eq_inf_compl (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : disjointed f n = f n ⊓ ⨅ i < n, (f i)ᶜ := by |
cases n
· rw [disjointed_zero, eq_comm, inf_eq_left]
simp_rw [le_iInf_iff]
exact fun i hi => (i.not_lt_zero hi).elim
simp_rw [disjointed_succ, partialSups_eq_biSup, sdiff_eq, compl_iSup]
congr
ext i
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Control.ForInStep.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Batteries.Tactic.Alias
namespace List
open Nat
/-! ### mem -/
@[simp] theorem mem_toArray {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l.toArray ↔ a ∈ l := by
simp [Array.mem_def]
/-! ### drop -/
@[simp]
theorem drop_one : ∀ l : List α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] | _ :: _ => rfl
/-! ### zipWith -/
theorem zipWith_distrib_tail : (zipWith f l l').tail = zipWith f l.tail l'.tail := by
rw [← drop_one]; simp [zipWith_distrib_drop]
/-! ### List subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := .rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_subset (l : List α) : [] ⊆ l := nofun
@[simp] theorem Subset.refl (l : List α) : l ⊆ l := fun _ i => i
theorem Subset.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ⊆ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ ⊆ l₃) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ :=
fun _ i => h₂ (h₁ i)
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Subset Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂ h₁⟩
instance : Trans (Subset : List α → List α → Prop) Subset Subset :=
⟨Subset.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l ⊆ a :: l := fun _ => Mem.tail _
theorem subset_of_cons_subset {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} : a :: l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
fun s _ i => s (mem_cons_of_mem _ i)
theorem subset_cons_of_subset (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun s _ i => .tail _ (s i)
theorem cons_subset_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : a :: l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun _ => by simp only [mem_cons]; exact Or.imp_right (@s _)
@[simp] theorem subset_append_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_left _
@[simp] theorem subset_append_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_right _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l₂ : List α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l₁ : List α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset : a :: l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem append_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l := by simp [subset_def, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem subset_nil {l : List α} : l ⊆ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun h => match l with | [] => rfl | _::_ => (nomatch h (.head ..)), fun | rfl => Subset.refl _⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
fun x => by simp only [mem_map]; exact .imp fun a => .imp_left (@H _)
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : ∀ l : List α, [] <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (nil_sublist l).cons a
@[simp] theorem Sublist.refl : ∀ l : List α, l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (Sublist.refl l).cons₂ a
theorem Sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ := by
induction h₂ generalizing l₁ with
| slnil => exact h₁
| cons _ _ IH => exact (IH h₁).cons _
| @cons₂ l₂ _ a _ IH =>
generalize e : a :: l₂ = l₂'
match e ▸ h₁ with
| .slnil => apply nil_sublist
| .cons a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons
| .cons₂ a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons₂
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Sublist Sublist := ⟨Sublist.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l <+ a :: l := (Sublist.refl l).cons _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
(sublist_cons a l₁).trans
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => nil_sublist _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂).cons₂ _
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => Sublist.refl _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂).cons _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_left ..
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_right ..
@[simp]
theorem cons_sublist_cons : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun | .cons _ s => sublist_of_cons_sublist s | .cons₂ _ s => s, .cons₂ _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left : ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| _ :: l => cons_sublist_cons.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem Sublist.append_left : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ :=
fun h l => (append_sublist_append_left l).mpr h
theorem Sublist.append_right : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l
| .slnil, _ => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons _
| .cons₂ _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons₂ _
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a :: l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l := by
induction l₁ generalizing l with
| nil => match h with
| .cons _ h => exact .inl h
| .cons₂ _ h => exact .inr (.head ..)
| cons b l₁ IH =>
match h with
| .cons _ h => exact (IH h).imp_left (Sublist.cons _)
| .cons₂ _ h => exact (IH h).imp (Sublist.cons₂ _) (.tail _)
theorem Sublist.reverse : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h => by rw [reverse_cons]; exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left h.reverse
| .cons₂ _ h => by rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons]; exact h.reverse.append_right _
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, Sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right (l) : l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => by
have := h.reverse
simp only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist] at this
exact this,
fun h => h.append_right l⟩
theorem Sublist.append (hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem Sublist.subset : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| .slnil, _, h => h
| .cons _ s, _, h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
| .cons₂ .., _, .head .. => .head ..
| .cons₂ _ s, _, .tail _ h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Subset Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁.subset h₂⟩
instance : Trans Subset (@Sublist α) Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁ h₂.subset⟩
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Sublist Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂.subset h₁⟩
theorem Sublist.length_le : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂
| .slnil => Nat.le_refl 0
| .cons _l s => le_succ_of_le (length_le s)
| .cons₂ _ s => succ_le_succ (length_le s)
@[simp] theorem sublist_nil {l : List α} : l <+ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun s => subset_nil.1 s.subset, fun H => H ▸ Sublist.refl _⟩
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| .slnil, _ => rfl
| .cons a s, h => nomatch Nat.not_lt.2 s.length_le (h ▸ lt_succ_self _)
| .cons₂ a s, h => by rw [s.eq_of_length (succ.inj h)]
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length_le (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s.eq_of_length <| Nat.le_antisymm s.length_le h
@[simp] theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨fun h => h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := append_of_mem h
exact ((nil_sublist _).cons₂ _).trans (sublist_append_right ..)
@[simp] theorem replicate_sublist_replicate {m n} (a : α) :
replicate m a <+ replicate n a ↔ m ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.length_le; simp only [length_replicate] at this ⊢; exact this
· induction h with
| refl => apply Sublist.refl
| step => simp [*, replicate, Sublist.cons]
theorem isSublist_iff_sublist [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁.isSublist l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp [isSublist]
case cons.cons hd₁ tl₁ hd₂ tl₂ =>
if h_eq : hd₁ = hd₂ then
simp [h_eq, cons_sublist_cons, isSublist_iff_sublist]
else
simp only [beq_iff_eq, h_eq]
constructor
· intro h_sub
apply Sublist.cons
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mp h_sub
· intro h_sub
cases h_sub
case cons h_sub =>
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mpr h_sub
case cons₂ =>
contradiction
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂) :=
decidable_of_iff (l₁.isSublist l₂) isSublist_iff_sublist
/-! ### tail -/
theorem tail_eq_tailD (l) : @tail α l = tailD l [] := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem tail_eq_tail? (l) : @tail α l = (tail? l).getD [] := by simp [tail_eq_tailD]
/-! ### next? -/
@[simp] theorem next?_nil : @next? α [] = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem next?_cons (a l) : @next? α (a :: l) = some (a, l) := rfl
/-! ### get? -/
theorem get_eq_iff : List.get l n = x ↔ l.get? n.1 = some x := by simp [get?_eq_some]
theorem get?_inj
(h₀ : i < xs.length) (h₁ : Nodup xs) (h₂ : xs.get? i = xs.get? j) : i = j := by
induction xs generalizing i j with
| nil => cases h₀
| cons x xs ih =>
match i, j with
| 0, 0 => rfl
| i+1, j+1 => simp; cases h₁ with
| cons ha h₁ => exact ih (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₀) h₁ h₂
| i+1, 0 => ?_ | 0, j+1 => ?_
all_goals
simp at h₂
cases h₁; rename_i h' h
have := h x ?_ rfl; cases this
rw [mem_iff_get?]
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_ , h₂.symm⟩
/-! ### drop -/
theorem tail_drop (l : List α) (n : Nat) : (l.drop n).tail = l.drop (n + 1) := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl hl =>
cases n
· simp
· simp [hl]
/-! ### modifyNth -/
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_nil (f : α → α) (n) : [].modifyNth f n = [] := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_zero_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f 0 = f a :: l := rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_succ_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) (n) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f (n + 1) = a :: l.modifyNth f n := by rfl
theorem modifyNthTail_id : ∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNthTail id n = l
| 0, _ => rfl
| _+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons a) (modifyNthTail_id n l)
theorem eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail : ∀ n (l : List α), eraseIdx l n = modifyNthTail tail n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons _) (eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail _ _)
@[deprecated] alias removeNth_eq_nth_tail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem get?_modifyNth (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α) m, (modifyNth f n l).get? m = (fun a => if n = m then f a else a) <$> l.get? m
| n, l, 0 => by cases l <;> cases n <;> rfl
| n, [], _+1 => by cases n <;> rfl
| 0, _ :: l, m+1 => by cases h : l.get? m <;> simp [h, modifyNth, m.succ_ne_zero.symm]
| n+1, a :: l, m+1 =>
(get?_modifyNth f n l m).trans <| by
cases h' : l.get? m <;> by_cases h : n = m <;>
simp [h, if_pos, if_neg, Option.map, mt Nat.succ.inj, not_false_iff, h']
theorem modifyNthTail_length (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _+1, [] => rfl
| _+1, _ :: _ => congrArg (·+1) (modifyNthTail_length _ H _ _)
theorem modifyNthTail_add (f : List α → List α) (n) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
modifyNthTail f (l₁.length + n) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ modifyNthTail f n l₂ := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_add]
theorem exists_of_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n ≤ l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNthTail f n l = l₁ ++ f l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, eq, hl⟩ : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n :=
⟨_, _, (take_append_drop n l).symm, length_take_of_le h⟩
⟨_, _, eq, hl, hl ▸ eq ▸ modifyNthTail_add (n := 0) ..⟩
@[simp] theorem modify_get?_length (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modifyNthTail_length _ fun l => by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : List α) :
(modifyNth f n l).get? n = f <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) :
(modifyNth f m l).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem exists_of_modifyNth (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNth f n l = l₁ ++ f a :: l₂ :=
match exists_of_modifyNthTail _ (Nat.le_of_lt h) with
| ⟨_, _::_, eq, hl, H⟩ => ⟨_, _, _, eq, hl, H⟩
| ⟨_, [], eq, hl, _⟩ => nomatch Nat.ne_of_gt h (eq ▸ append_nil _ ▸ hl)
theorem modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop (f : List α → List α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modifyNthTail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => H.symm
| n + 1, b :: l => congrArg (cons b) (modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop f H n l)
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ modifyHead f (drop n l) :=
modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ f (get l ⟨n, h⟩) :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_get_cons h]; rfl
/-! ### set -/
theorem set_eq_modifyNth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : List α), set l n a = modifyNth (fun _ => a) n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l => congrArg (cons _) (set_eq_modifyNth _ _ _)
theorem set_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
set l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth, modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get? (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNth f n = ((fun a => l.set n (f a)) <$> l.get? n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l =>
(congrArg (cons _) (modifyNth_eq_set_get? ..)).trans <| by cases h : l.get? n <;> simp [h]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Lemmas.lean | 372 | 374 | theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h) :
l.modifyNth f n = l.set n (f (l.get ⟨n, h⟩)) := by |
rw [modifyNth_eq_set_get?, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.witt_polynomial from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c3019c79074b0619edb4b27553a91b2e82242395"
/-!
# Witt polynomials
To endow `WittVector p R` with a ring structure,
we need to study the so-called Witt polynomials.
Fix a base value `p : ℕ`.
The `p`-adic Witt polynomials are an infinite family of polynomials
indexed by a natural number `n`, taking values in an arbitrary ring `R`.
The variables of these polynomials are represented by natural numbers.
The variable set of the `n`th Witt polynomial contains at most `n+1` elements `{0, ..., n}`,
with exactly these variables when `R` has characteristic `0`.
These polynomials are used to define the addition and multiplication operators
on the type of Witt vectors. (While this type itself is not complicated,
the ring operations are what make it interesting.)
When the base `p` is invertible in `R`, the `p`-adic Witt polynomials
form a basis for `MvPolynomial ℕ R`, equivalent to the standard basis.
## Main declarations
* `WittPolynomial p R n`: the `n`-th Witt polynomial, viewed as polynomial over the ring `R`
* `xInTermsOfW p R n`: if `p` is invertible, the polynomial `X n` is contained in the subalgebra
generated by the Witt polynomials. `xInTermsOfW p R n` is the explicit polynomial,
which upon being bound to the Witt polynomials yields `X n`.
* `bind₁_wittPolynomial_xInTermsOfW`: the proof of the claim that
`bind₁ (xInTermsOfW p R) (W_ R n) = X n`
* `bind₁_xInTermsOfW_wittPolynomial`: the converse of the above statement
## Notation
In this file we use the following notation
* `p` is a natural number, typically assumed to be prime.
* `R` and `S` are commutative rings
* `W n` (and `W_ R n` when the ring needs to be explicit) denotes the `n`th Witt polynomial
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
open MvPolynomial
open Finset hiding map
open Finsupp (single)
--attribute [-simp] coe_eval₂_hom
variable (p : ℕ)
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [DecidableEq R]
/-- `wittPolynomial p R n` is the `n`-th Witt polynomial
with respect to a prime `p` with coefficients in a commutative ring `R`.
It is defined as:
`∑_{i ≤ n} p^i X_i^{p^{n-i}} ∈ R[X_0, X_1, X_2, …]`. -/
noncomputable def wittPolynomial (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial ℕ R :=
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), monomial (single i (p ^ (n - i))) ((p : R) ^ i)
#align witt_polynomial wittPolynomial
theorem wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) :
wittPolynomial p R n = ∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), C ((p : R) ^ i) * X i ^ p ^ (n - i) := by
apply sum_congr rfl
rintro i -
rw [monomial_eq, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
rw [pow_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align witt_polynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow
/-! We set up notation locally to this file, to keep statements short and comprehensible.
This allows us to simply write `W n` or `W_ ℤ n`. -/
-- Notation with ring of coefficients explicit
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Witt] notation "W_" => wittPolynomial p
-- Notation with ring of coefficients implicit
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Witt] notation "W" => wittPolynomial p _
open Witt
open MvPolynomial
/-! The first observation is that the Witt polynomial doesn't really depend on the coefficient ring.
If we map the coefficients through a ring homomorphism, we obtain the corresponding Witt polynomial
over the target ring. -/
section
variable {R} {S : Type*} [CommRing S]
@[simp]
theorem map_wittPolynomial (f : R →+* S) (n : ℕ) : map f (W n) = W n := by
rw [wittPolynomial, map_sum, wittPolynomial]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i _ => ?_
rw [map_monomial, RingHom.map_pow, map_natCast]
#align map_witt_polynomial map_wittPolynomial
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittPolynomial [hp : Fact p.Prime] (n : ℕ) :
constantCoeff (wittPolynomial p R n) = 0 := by
simp only [wittPolynomial, map_sum, constantCoeff_monomial]
rw [sum_eq_zero]
rintro i _
rw [if_neg]
rw [Finsupp.single_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_gt (pow_pos hp.1.pos _)
#align constant_coeff_witt_polynomial constantCoeff_wittPolynomial
@[simp]
theorem wittPolynomial_zero : wittPolynomial p R 0 = X 0 := by
simp only [wittPolynomial, X, sum_singleton, range_one, pow_zero, zero_add, tsub_self]
#align witt_polynomial_zero wittPolynomial_zero
@[simp]
theorem wittPolynomial_one : wittPolynomial p R 1 = C (p : R) * X 1 + X 0 ^ p := by
simp only [wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow, sum_range_succ_comm, range_one, sum_singleton,
one_mul, pow_one, C_1, pow_zero, tsub_self, tsub_zero]
#align witt_polynomial_one wittPolynomial_one
theorem aeval_wittPolynomial {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] (f : ℕ → A) (n : ℕ) :
aeval f (W_ R n) = ∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), (p : A) ^ i * f i ^ p ^ (n - i) := by
simp [wittPolynomial, AlgHom.map_sum, aeval_monomial, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
#align aeval_witt_polynomial aeval_wittPolynomial
/-- Over the ring `ZMod (p^(n+1))`, we produce the `n+1`st Witt polynomial
by expanding the `n`th Witt polynomial by `p`. -/
@[simp]
theorem wittPolynomial_zmod_self (n : ℕ) :
W_ (ZMod (p ^ (n + 1))) (n + 1) = expand p (W_ (ZMod (p ^ (n + 1))) n) := by
simp only [wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow]
rw [sum_range_succ, ← Nat.cast_pow, CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod (p ^ (n + 1))) (p ^ (n + 1)), C_0,
zero_mul, add_zero, AlgHom.map_sum, sum_congr rfl]
intro k hk
rw [AlgHom.map_mul, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, algHom_C, ← pow_mul, ← pow_succ']
congr
rw [mem_range] at hk
rw [add_comm, add_tsub_assoc_of_le (Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp hk), ← add_comm]
#align witt_polynomial_zmod_self wittPolynomial_zmod_self
section PPrime
variable [hp : NeZero p]
theorem wittPolynomial_vars [CharZero R] (n : ℕ) : (wittPolynomial p R n).vars = range (n + 1) := by
have : ∀ i, (monomial (Finsupp.single i (p ^ (n - i))) ((p : R) ^ i)).vars = {i} := by
intro i
refine vars_monomial_single i (pow_ne_zero _ hp.1) ?_
rw [← Nat.cast_pow, Nat.cast_ne_zero]
exact pow_ne_zero i hp.1
rw [wittPolynomial, vars_sum_of_disjoint]
· simp only [this, biUnion_singleton_eq_self]
· simp only [this]
intro a b h
apply disjoint_singleton_left.mpr
rwa [mem_singleton]
#align witt_polynomial_vars wittPolynomial_vars
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/WittPolynomial.lean | 184 | 186 | theorem wittPolynomial_vars_subset (n : ℕ) : (wittPolynomial p R n).vars ⊆ range (n + 1) := by |
rw [← map_wittPolynomial p (Int.castRingHom R), ← wittPolynomial_vars p ℤ]
apply vars_map
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Opens
#align_import topology.local_at_target from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Properties of maps that are local at the target.
We show that the following properties of continuous maps are local at the target :
- `Inducing`
- `Embedding`
- `OpenEmbedding`
- `ClosedEmbedding`
-/
open TopologicalSpace Set Filter
open Topology Filter
variable {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
variable {s : Set β} {ι : Type*} {U : ι → Opens β} (hU : iSup U = ⊤)
theorem Set.restrictPreimage_inducing (s : Set β) (h : Inducing f) :
Inducing (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
simp_rw [← inducing_subtype_val.of_comp_iff, inducing_iff_nhds, restrictPreimage,
MapsTo.coe_restrict, restrict_eq, ← @Filter.comap_comap _ _ _ _ _ f, Function.comp_apply] at h ⊢
intro a
rw [← h, ← inducing_subtype_val.nhds_eq_comap]
#align set.restrict_preimage_inducing Set.restrictPreimage_inducing
alias Inducing.restrictPreimage := Set.restrictPreimage_inducing
#align inducing.restrict_preimage Inducing.restrictPreimage
theorem Set.restrictPreimage_embedding (s : Set β) (h : Embedding f) :
Embedding (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
⟨h.1.restrictPreimage s, h.2.restrictPreimage s⟩
#align set.restrict_preimage_embedding Set.restrictPreimage_embedding
alias Embedding.restrictPreimage := Set.restrictPreimage_embedding
#align embedding.restrict_preimage Embedding.restrictPreimage
theorem Set.restrictPreimage_openEmbedding (s : Set β) (h : OpenEmbedding f) :
OpenEmbedding (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
⟨h.1.restrictPreimage s,
(s.range_restrictPreimage f).symm ▸ continuous_subtype_val.isOpen_preimage _ h.isOpen_range⟩
#align set.restrict_preimage_open_embedding Set.restrictPreimage_openEmbedding
alias OpenEmbedding.restrictPreimage := Set.restrictPreimage_openEmbedding
#align open_embedding.restrict_preimage OpenEmbedding.restrictPreimage
theorem Set.restrictPreimage_closedEmbedding (s : Set β) (h : ClosedEmbedding f) :
ClosedEmbedding (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
⟨h.1.restrictPreimage s,
(s.range_restrictPreimage f).symm ▸ inducing_subtype_val.isClosed_preimage _ h.isClosed_range⟩
#align set.restrict_preimage_closed_embedding Set.restrictPreimage_closedEmbedding
alias ClosedEmbedding.restrictPreimage := Set.restrictPreimage_closedEmbedding
#align closed_embedding.restrict_preimage ClosedEmbedding.restrictPreimage
theorem IsClosedMap.restrictPreimage (H : IsClosedMap f) (s : Set β) :
IsClosedMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
intro t
suffices ∀ u, IsClosed u → Subtype.val ⁻¹' u = t →
∃ v, IsClosed v ∧ Subtype.val ⁻¹' v = s.restrictPreimage f '' t by
simpa [isClosed_induced_iff]
exact fun u hu e => ⟨f '' u, H u hu, by simp [← e, image_restrictPreimage]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-02")]
theorem Set.restrictPreimage_isClosedMap (s : Set β) (H : IsClosedMap f) :
IsClosedMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := H.restrictPreimage s
theorem IsOpenMap.restrictPreimage (H : IsOpenMap f) (s : Set β) :
IsOpenMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
intro t
suffices ∀ u, IsOpen u → Subtype.val ⁻¹' u = t →
∃ v, IsOpen v ∧ Subtype.val ⁻¹' v = s.restrictPreimage f '' t by
simpa [isOpen_induced_iff]
exact fun u hu e => ⟨f '' u, H u hu, by simp [← e, image_restrictPreimage]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-02")]
theorem Set.restrictPreimage_isOpenMap (s : Set β) (H : IsOpenMap f) :
IsOpenMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := H.restrictPreimage s
theorem isOpen_iff_inter_of_iSup_eq_top (s : Set β) : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (s ∩ U i) := by
constructor
· exact fun H i => H.inter (U i).2
· intro H
have : ⋃ i, (U i : Set β) = Set.univ := by
convert congr_arg (SetLike.coe) hU
simp
rw [← s.inter_univ, ← this, Set.inter_iUnion]
exact isOpen_iUnion H
#align is_open_iff_inter_of_supr_eq_top isOpen_iff_inter_of_iSup_eq_top
theorem isOpen_iff_coe_preimage_of_iSup_eq_top (s : Set β) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set (U i)) := by
-- Porting note: rewrote to avoid ´simp´ issues
rw [isOpen_iff_inter_of_iSup_eq_top hU s]
refine forall_congr' fun i => ?_
rw [(U _).2.openEmbedding_subtype_val.open_iff_image_open]
erw [Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range]
rw [Subtype.range_coe, Opens.carrier_eq_coe]
#align is_open_iff_coe_preimage_of_supr_eq_top isOpen_iff_coe_preimage_of_iSup_eq_top
theorem isClosed_iff_coe_preimage_of_iSup_eq_top (s : Set β) :
IsClosed s ↔ ∀ i, IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set (U i)) := by
simpa using isOpen_iff_coe_preimage_of_iSup_eq_top hU sᶜ
#align is_closed_iff_coe_preimage_of_supr_eq_top isClosed_iff_coe_preimage_of_iSup_eq_top
theorem isClosedMap_iff_isClosedMap_of_iSup_eq_top :
IsClosedMap f ↔ ∀ i, IsClosedMap ((U i).1.restrictPreimage f) := by
refine ⟨fun h i => h.restrictPreimage _, ?_⟩
rintro H s hs
rw [isClosed_iff_coe_preimage_of_iSup_eq_top hU]
intro i
convert H i _ ⟨⟨_, hs.1, eq_compl_comm.mpr rfl⟩⟩
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
suffices (∃ y, y ∈ s ∧ f y = x) ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ s ∧ f y ∈ U i ∧ f y = x by
simpa [Set.restrictPreimage, ← Subtype.coe_inj]
exact ⟨fun ⟨a, b, c⟩ => ⟨a, b, c.symm ▸ hx, c⟩, fun ⟨a, b, _, c⟩ => ⟨a, b, c⟩⟩
#align is_closed_map_iff_is_closed_map_of_supr_eq_top isClosedMap_iff_isClosedMap_of_iSup_eq_top
theorem inducing_iff_inducing_of_iSup_eq_top (h : Continuous f) :
Inducing f ↔ ∀ i, Inducing ((U i).1.restrictPreimage f) := by
simp_rw [← inducing_subtype_val.of_comp_iff, inducing_iff_nhds, restrictPreimage,
MapsTo.coe_restrict, restrict_eq, ← @Filter.comap_comap _ _ _ _ _ f]
constructor
· intro H i x
rw [Function.comp_apply, ← H, ← inducing_subtype_val.nhds_eq_comap]
· intro H x
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ :=
Opens.mem_iSup.mp
(show f x ∈ iSup U by
rw [hU]
trivial)
erw [← OpenEmbedding.map_nhds_eq (h.1 _ (U i).2).openEmbedding_subtype_val ⟨x, hi⟩]
rw [(H i) ⟨x, hi⟩, Filter.subtype_coe_map_comap, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk,
inf_eq_left, Filter.le_principal_iff]
exact Filter.preimage_mem_comap ((U i).2.mem_nhds hi)
#align inducing_iff_inducing_of_supr_eq_top inducing_iff_inducing_of_iSup_eq_top
theorem embedding_iff_embedding_of_iSup_eq_top (h : Continuous f) :
Embedding f ↔ ∀ i, Embedding ((U i).1.restrictPreimage f) := by
simp_rw [embedding_iff]
rw [forall_and]
apply and_congr
· apply inducing_iff_inducing_of_iSup_eq_top <;> assumption
· apply Set.injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
convert congr_arg SetLike.coe hU
simp
#align embedding_iff_embedding_of_supr_eq_top embedding_iff_embedding_of_iSup_eq_top
theorem openEmbedding_iff_openEmbedding_of_iSup_eq_top (h : Continuous f) :
OpenEmbedding f ↔ ∀ i, OpenEmbedding ((U i).1.restrictPreimage f) := by
simp_rw [openEmbedding_iff]
rw [forall_and]
apply and_congr
· apply embedding_iff_embedding_of_iSup_eq_top <;> assumption
· simp_rw [Set.range_restrictPreimage]
apply isOpen_iff_coe_preimage_of_iSup_eq_top hU
#align open_embedding_iff_open_embedding_of_supr_eq_top openEmbedding_iff_openEmbedding_of_iSup_eq_top
| Mathlib/Topology/LocalAtTarget.lean | 169 | 176 | theorem closedEmbedding_iff_closedEmbedding_of_iSup_eq_top (h : Continuous f) :
ClosedEmbedding f ↔ ∀ i, ClosedEmbedding ((U i).1.restrictPreimage f) := by |
simp_rw [closedEmbedding_iff]
rw [forall_and]
apply and_congr
· apply embedding_iff_embedding_of_iSup_eq_top <;> assumption
· simp_rw [Set.range_restrictPreimage]
apply isClosed_iff_coe_preimage_of_iSup_eq_top hU
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Seq.Seq
#align_import data.seq.wseq from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7e36e48519ab281320c4d192da6a7b348ce40ad"
/-!
# Partially defined possibly infinite lists
This file provides a `WSeq α` type representing partially defined possibly infinite lists
(referred here as weak sequences).
-/
namespace Stream'
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
/-- Weak sequences.
While the `Seq` structure allows for lists which may not be finite,
a weak sequence also allows the computation of each element to
involve an indeterminate amount of computation, including possibly
an infinite loop. This is represented as a regular `Seq` interspersed
with `none` elements to indicate that computation is ongoing.
This model is appropriate for Haskell style lazy lists, and is closed
under most interesting computation patterns on infinite lists,
but conversely it is difficult to extract elements from it. -/
def WSeq (α) :=
Seq (Option α)
#align stream.wseq Stream'.WSeq
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
namespace WSeq
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- Turn a sequence into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofSeq : Seq α → WSeq α :=
(· <$> ·) some
#align stream.wseq.of_seq Stream'.WSeq.ofSeq
/-- Turn a list into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofList (l : List α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_list Stream'.WSeq.ofList
/-- Turn a stream into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofStream (l : Stream' α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_stream Stream'.WSeq.ofStream
instance coeSeq : Coe (Seq α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofSeq⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_seq Stream'.WSeq.coeSeq
instance coeList : Coe (List α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_list Stream'.WSeq.coeList
instance coeStream : Coe (Stream' α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofStream⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_stream Stream'.WSeq.coeStream
/-- The empty weak sequence -/
def nil : WSeq α :=
Seq.nil
#align stream.wseq.nil Stream'.WSeq.nil
instance inhabited : Inhabited (WSeq α) :=
⟨nil⟩
#align stream.wseq.inhabited Stream'.WSeq.inhabited
/-- Prepend an element to a weak sequence -/
def cons (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons (some a)
#align stream.wseq.cons Stream'.WSeq.cons
/-- Compute for one tick, without producing any elements -/
def think : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons none
#align stream.wseq.think Stream'.WSeq.think
/-- Destruct a weak sequence, to (eventually possibly) produce either
`none` for `nil` or `some (a, s)` if an element is produced. -/
def destruct : WSeq α → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α)) :=
Computation.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl none
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inl (some (a, s'))
#align stream.wseq.destruct Stream'.WSeq.destruct
/-- Recursion principle for weak sequences, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : WSeq α → Sort v} (s : WSeq α) (h1 : C nil) (h2 : ∀ x s, C (cons x s))
(h3 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
Seq.recOn s h1 fun o => Option.recOn o h3 h2
#align stream.wseq.rec_on Stream'.WSeq.recOn
/-- membership for weak sequences-/
protected def Mem (a : α) (s : WSeq α) :=
Seq.Mem (some a) s
#align stream.wseq.mem Stream'.WSeq.Mem
instance membership : Membership α (WSeq α) :=
⟨WSeq.Mem⟩
#align stream.wseq.has_mem Stream'.WSeq.membership
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ @nil α :=
Seq.not_mem_nil (some a)
#align stream.wseq.not_mem_nil Stream'.WSeq.not_mem_nil
/-- Get the head of a weak sequence. This involves a possibly
infinite computation. -/
def head (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
Computation.map (Prod.fst <$> ·) (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head Stream'.WSeq.head
/-- Encode a computation yielding a weak sequence into additional
`think` constructors in a weak sequence -/
def flatten : Computation (WSeq α) → WSeq α :=
Seq.corec fun c =>
match Computation.destruct c with
| Sum.inl s => Seq.omap (return ·) (Seq.destruct s)
| Sum.inr c' => some (none, c')
#align stream.wseq.flatten Stream'.WSeq.flatten
/-- Get the tail of a weak sequence. This doesn't need a `Computation`
wrapper, unlike `head`, because `flatten` allows us to hide this
in the construction of the weak sequence itself. -/
def tail (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
flatten <| (fun o => Option.recOn o nil Prod.snd) <$> destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail Stream'.WSeq.tail
/-- drop the first `n` elements from `s`. -/
def drop (s : WSeq α) : ℕ → WSeq α
| 0 => s
| n + 1 => tail (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.drop Stream'.WSeq.drop
/-- Get the nth element of `s`. -/
def get? (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (Option α) :=
head (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.nth Stream'.WSeq.get?
/-- Convert `s` to a list (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def toList (s : WSeq α) : Computation (List α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α) (List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s'))
([], s)
#align stream.wseq.to_list Stream'.WSeq.toList
/-- Get the length of `s` (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def length (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
@Computation.corec ℕ (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl n
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, s')
| some (some _, s') => Sum.inr (n + 1, s'))
(0, s)
#align stream.wseq.length Stream'.WSeq.length
/-- A weak sequence is finite if `toList s` terminates. Equivalently,
it is a finite number of `think` and `cons` applied to `nil`. -/
class IsFinite (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
out : (toList s).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.is_finite Stream'.WSeq.IsFinite
instance toList_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : IsFinite s] : (toList s).Terminates :=
h.out
#align stream.wseq.to_list_terminates Stream'.WSeq.toList_terminates
/-- Get the list corresponding to a finite weak sequence. -/
def get (s : WSeq α) [IsFinite s] : List α :=
(toList s).get
#align stream.wseq.get Stream'.WSeq.get
/-- A weak sequence is *productive* if it never stalls forever - there are
always a finite number of `think`s between `cons` constructors.
The sequence itself is allowed to be infinite though. -/
class Productive (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
get?_terminates : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.productive Stream'.WSeq.Productive
#align stream.wseq.productive.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.Productive.get?_terminates
theorem productive_iff (s : WSeq α) : Productive s ↔ ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_iff Stream'.WSeq.productive_iff
instance get?_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : Productive s] : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
h.get?_terminates
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates
instance head_terminates (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : (head s).Terminates :=
s.get?_terminates 0
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates
/-- Replace the `n`th element of `s` with `a`. -/
def updateNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (some a, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.update_nth Stream'.WSeq.updateNth
/-- Remove the `n`th element of `s`. -/
def removeNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (none, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.remove_nth Stream'.WSeq.removeNth
/-- Map the elements of `s` over `f`, removing any values that yield `none`. -/
def filterMap (f : α → Option β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, s')
| some (some a, s') => some (f a, s')
#align stream.wseq.filter_map Stream'.WSeq.filterMap
/-- Select the elements of `s` that satisfy `p`. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
filterMap fun a => if p a then some a else none
#align stream.wseq.filter Stream'.WSeq.filter
-- example of infinite list manipulations
/-- Get the first element of `s` satisfying `p`. -/
def find (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
head <| filter p s
#align stream.wseq.find Stream'.WSeq.find
/-- Zip a function over two weak sequences -/
def zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (s1 : WSeq α) (s2 : WSeq β) : WSeq γ :=
@Seq.corec (Option γ) (WSeq α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some _, _), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some _, _) => some (none, s1', s2)
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some (f a1 a2), s1', s2')
| _, _ => none)
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.zip_with Stream'.WSeq.zipWith
/-- Zip two weak sequences into a single sequence of pairs -/
def zip : WSeq α → WSeq β → WSeq (α × β) :=
zipWith Prod.mk
#align stream.wseq.zip Stream'.WSeq.zip
/-- Get the list of indexes of elements of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndexes (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : WSeq ℕ :=
(zip s (Stream'.nats : WSeq ℕ)).filterMap fun ⟨a, n⟩ => if p a then some n else none
#align stream.wseq.find_indexes Stream'.WSeq.findIndexes
/-- Get the index of the first element of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndex (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
(fun o => Option.getD o 0) <$> head (findIndexes p s)
#align stream.wseq.find_index Stream'.WSeq.findIndex
/-- Get the index of the first occurrence of `a` in `s` -/
def indexOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → Computation ℕ :=
findIndex (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.index_of Stream'.WSeq.indexOf
/-- Get the indexes of occurrences of `a` in `s` -/
def indexesOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq ℕ :=
findIndexes (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.indexes_of Stream'.WSeq.indexesOf
/-- `union s1 s2` is a weak sequence which interleaves `s1` and `s2` in
some order (nondeterministically). -/
def union (s1 s2 : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (WSeq α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| none, none => none
| some (a1, s1'), none => some (a1, s1', nil)
| none, some (a2, s2') => some (a2, nil, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (some a1, s1', s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a2, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a1, cons a2 s1', s2'))
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.union Stream'.WSeq.union
/-- Returns `true` if `s` is `nil` and `false` if `s` has an element -/
def isEmpty (s : WSeq α) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.map Option.isNone <| head s
#align stream.wseq.is_empty Stream'.WSeq.isEmpty
/-- Calculate one step of computation -/
def compute (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
match Seq.destruct s with
| some (none, s') => s'
| _ => s
#align stream.wseq.compute Stream'.WSeq.compute
/-- Get the first `n` elements of a weak sequence -/
def take (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => none
| _ + 1, none => none
| m + 1, some (none, s') => some (none, m + 1, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => some (some a, m, s'))
(n, s)
#align stream.wseq.take Stream'.WSeq.take
/-- Split the sequence at position `n` into a finite initial segment
and the weak sequence tail -/
def splitAt (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (List α × WSeq α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α × WSeq α) (ℕ × List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, l, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, none => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, l, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (m, a::l, s'))
(n, [], s)
#align stream.wseq.split_at Stream'.WSeq.splitAt
/-- Returns `true` if any element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def any (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl false
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inl true else Sum.inr s')
s
#align stream.wseq.any Stream'.WSeq.any
/-- Returns `true` if every element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def all (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl true
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inr s' else Sum.inl false)
s
#align stream.wseq.all Stream'.WSeq.all
/-- Apply a function to the elements of the sequence to produce a sequence
of partial results. (There is no `scanr` because this would require
working from the end of the sequence, which may not exist.) -/
def scanl (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (s : WSeq β) : WSeq α :=
cons a <|
@Seq.corec (Option α) (α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨a, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, a, s')
| some (some b, s') =>
let a' := f a b
some (some a', a', s'))
(a, s)
#align stream.wseq.scanl Stream'.WSeq.scanl
/-- Get the weak sequence of initial segments of the input sequence -/
def inits (s : WSeq α) : WSeq (List α) :=
cons [] <|
@Seq.corec (Option (List α)) (Batteries.DList α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, l, s')
| some (some a, s') =>
let l' := l.push a
some (some l'.toList, l', s'))
(Batteries.DList.empty, s)
#align stream.wseq.inits Stream'.WSeq.inits
/-- Like take, but does not wait for a result. Calculates `n` steps of
computation and returns the sequence computed so far -/
def collect (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : List α :=
(Seq.take n s).filterMap id
#align stream.wseq.collect Stream'.WSeq.collect
/-- Append two weak sequences. As with `Seq.append`, this may not use
the second sequence if the first one takes forever to compute -/
def append : WSeq α → WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.append
#align stream.wseq.append Stream'.WSeq.append
/-- Map a function over a weak sequence -/
def map (f : α → β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.map (Option.map f)
#align stream.wseq.map Stream'.WSeq.map
/-- Flatten a sequence of weak sequences. (Note that this allows
empty sequences, unlike `Seq.join`.) -/
def join (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : WSeq α :=
Seq.join
((fun o : Option (WSeq α) =>
match o with
| none => Seq1.ret none
| some s => (none, s)) <$>
S)
#align stream.wseq.join Stream'.WSeq.join
/-- Monadic bind operator for weak sequences -/
def bind (s : WSeq α) (f : α → WSeq β) : WSeq β :=
join (map f s)
#align stream.wseq.bind Stream'.WSeq.bind
/-- lift a relation to a relation over weak sequences -/
@[simp]
def LiftRelO (R : α → β → Prop) (C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop) :
Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (β × WSeq β) → Prop
| none, none => True
| some (a, s), some (b, t) => R a b ∧ C s t
| _, _ => False
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO
theorem LiftRelO.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop} (H1 : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b)
(H2 : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) : ∀ {o p}, LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO S D o p
| none, none, _ => trivial
| some (_, _), some (_, _), h => And.imp (H1 _ _) (H2 _ _) h
| none, some _, h => False.elim h
| some (_, _), none, h => False.elim h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp
theorem LiftRelO.imp_right (R : α → β → Prop) {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop}
(H : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) {o p} : LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO R D o p :=
LiftRelO.imp (fun _ _ => id) H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp_right Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp_right
/-- Definition of bisimilarity for weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def BisimO (R : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop) : Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (α × WSeq α) → Prop :=
LiftRelO (· = ·) R
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o Stream'.WSeq.BisimO
theorem BisimO.imp {R S : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop} (H : ∀ s t, R s t → S s t) {o p} :
BisimO R o p → BisimO S o p :=
LiftRelO.imp_right _ H
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.BisimO.imp
/-- Two weak sequences are `LiftRel R` related if they are either both empty,
or they are both nonempty and the heads are `R` related and the tails are
`LiftRel R` related. (This is a coinductive definition.) -/
def LiftRel (R : α → β → Prop) (s : WSeq α) (t : WSeq β) : Prop :=
∃ C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop,
C s t ∧ ∀ {s t}, C s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R C) (destruct s) (destruct t)
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel
/-- If two sequences are equivalent, then they have the same values and
the same computational behavior (i.e. if one loops forever then so does
the other), although they may differ in the number of `think`s needed to
arrive at the answer. -/
def Equiv : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop :=
LiftRel (· = ·)
#align stream.wseq.equiv Stream'.WSeq.Equiv
theorem liftRel_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t)
| ⟨R, h1, h2⟩ => by
refine Computation.LiftRel.imp ?_ _ _ (h2 h1)
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
exact fun s' t' h' => ⟨R, h', @h2⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct
theorem liftRel_destruct_iff {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
⟨liftRel_destruct, fun h =>
⟨fun s t =>
LiftRel R s t ∨ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t),
Or.inr h, fun {s t} h => by
have h : Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) := by
cases' h with h h
· exact liftRel_destruct h
· assumption
apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ h
intro a b
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t
apply Or.inl⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct_iff Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct_iff
-- Porting note: To avoid ambiguous notation, `~` became `~ʷ`.
infixl:50 " ~ʷ " => Equiv
theorem destruct_congr {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t → Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr
theorem destruct_congr_iff {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct_iff
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr_iff Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr_iff
theorem LiftRel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Reflexive R) : Reflexive (LiftRel R) := fun s => by
refine ⟨(· = ·), rfl, fun {s t} (h : s = t) => ?_⟩
rw [← h]
apply Computation.LiftRel.refl
intro a
cases' a with a
· simp
· cases a
simp only [LiftRelO, and_true]
apply H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.refl Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.refl
theorem LiftRelO.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (C) :
swap (LiftRelO R C) = LiftRelO (swap R) (swap C) := by
funext x y
rcases x with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hx, jx⟩ <;> rcases y with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hy, jy⟩ <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.swap
theorem LiftRel.swap_lem {R : α → β → Prop} {s1 s2} (h : LiftRel R s1 s2) :
LiftRel (swap R) s2 s1 := by
refine ⟨swap (LiftRel R), h, fun {s t} (h : LiftRel R t s) => ?_⟩
rw [← LiftRelO.swap, Computation.LiftRel.swap]
apply liftRel_destruct h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap_lem Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap_lem
theorem LiftRel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) : swap (LiftRel R) = LiftRel (swap R) :=
funext fun _ => funext fun _ => propext ⟨LiftRel.swap_lem, LiftRel.swap_lem⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap
theorem LiftRel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Symmetric R) : Symmetric (LiftRel R) :=
fun s1 s2 (h : Function.swap (LiftRel R) s2 s1) => by rwa [LiftRel.swap, H.swap_eq] at h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.symm Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.symm
theorem LiftRel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Transitive R) : Transitive (LiftRel R) :=
fun s t u h1 h2 => by
refine ⟨fun s u => ∃ t, LiftRel R s t ∧ LiftRel R t u, ⟨t, h1, h2⟩, fun {s u} h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨t, h1, h2⟩
have h1 := liftRel_destruct h1
have h2 := liftRel_destruct h2
refine
Computation.liftRel_def.2
⟨(Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h1).trans (Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h2),
fun {a c} ha hc => ?_⟩
rcases h1.left ha with ⟨b, hb, t1⟩
have t2 := Computation.rel_of_liftRel h2 hb hc
cases' a with a <;> cases' c with c
· trivial
· cases b
· cases t2
· cases t1
· cases a
cases' b with b
· cases t1
· cases b
cases t2
· cases' a with a s
cases' b with b
· cases t1
cases' b with b t
cases' c with c u
cases' t1 with ab st
cases' t2 with bc tu
exact ⟨H ab bc, t, st, tu⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.trans Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.trans
theorem LiftRel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : Equivalence R → Equivalence (LiftRel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ => ⟨LiftRel.refl R refl, @(LiftRel.symm R @symm), @(LiftRel.trans R @trans)⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.equiv Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.equiv
@[refl]
theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ s : WSeq α, s ~ʷ s :=
LiftRel.refl (· = ·) Eq.refl
#align stream.wseq.equiv.refl Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.refl
@[symm]
theorem Equiv.symm : ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ s :=
@(LiftRel.symm (· = ·) (@Eq.symm _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.symm Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
theorem Equiv.trans : ∀ {s t u : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ u → s ~ʷ u :=
@(LiftRel.trans (· = ·) (@Eq.trans _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.trans Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.trans
theorem Equiv.equivalence : Equivalence (@Equiv α) :=
⟨@Equiv.refl _, @Equiv.symm _, @Equiv.trans _⟩
#align stream.wseq.equiv.equivalence Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.equivalence
open Computation
@[simp]
theorem destruct_nil : destruct (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : destruct (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some (a, s)) :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure <| by simp [destruct, cons, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : destruct (think s) = (destruct s).think :=
Computation.destruct_eq_think <| by simp [destruct, think, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_nil : Seq.destruct (nil : WSeq α) = none :=
Seq.destruct_nil
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : Seq.destruct (cons a s) = some (some a, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : Seq.destruct (think s) = some (none, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem head_nil : head (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_nil Stream'.WSeq.head_nil
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s) : head (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some a) := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_cons Stream'.WSeq.head_cons
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : WSeq α) : head (think s) = (head s).think := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_think Stream'.WSeq.head_think
@[simp]
theorem flatten_pure (s : WSeq α) : flatten (Computation.pure s) = s := by
refine Seq.eq_of_bisim (fun s1 s2 => flatten (Computation.pure s2) = s1) ?_ rfl
intro s' s h
rw [← h]
simp only [Seq.BisimO, flatten, Seq.omap, pure_def, Seq.corec_eq, destruct_pure]
cases Seq.destruct s with
| none => simp
| some val =>
cases' val with o s'
simp
#align stream.wseq.flatten_ret Stream'.WSeq.flatten_pure
@[simp]
theorem flatten_think (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : flatten c.think = think (flatten c) :=
Seq.destruct_eq_cons <| by simp [flatten, think]
#align stream.wseq.flatten_think Stream'.WSeq.flatten_think
@[simp]
theorem destruct_flatten (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : destruct (flatten c) = c >>= destruct := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 => c1 = c2 ∨ ∃ c, c1 = destruct (flatten c) ∧ c2 = Computation.bind c destruct) ?_
(Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩)
intro c1 c2 h
exact
match c1, c2, h with
| c, _, Or.inl rfl => by cases c.destruct <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩ => by
induction' c using Computation.recOn with a c' <;> simp
· cases (destruct a).destruct <;> simp
· exact Or.inr ⟨c', rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_flatten Stream'.WSeq.destruct_flatten
theorem head_terminates_iff (s : WSeq α) : Terminates (head s) ↔ Terminates (destruct s) :=
terminates_map_iff _ (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_iff Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_iff
@[simp]
theorem tail_nil : tail (nil : WSeq α) = nil := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_nil Stream'.WSeq.tail_nil
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s) : tail (cons a s) = s := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_cons Stream'.WSeq.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : WSeq α) : tail (think s) = (tail s).think := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_think Stream'.WSeq.tail_think
@[simp]
theorem dropn_nil (n) : drop (nil : WSeq α) n = nil := by induction n <;> simp [*, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_nil Stream'.WSeq.dropn_nil
@[simp]
theorem dropn_cons (a : α) (s) (n) : drop (cons a s) (n + 1) = drop s n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [drop]
| succ n n_ih =>
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [*, drop]`.
simp [drop, ← n_ih]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_cons Stream'.WSeq.dropn_cons
@[simp]
theorem dropn_think (s : WSeq α) (n) : drop (think s) n = (drop s n).think := by
induction n <;> simp [*, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_think Stream'.WSeq.dropn_think
theorem dropn_add (s : WSeq α) (m) : ∀ n, drop s (m + n) = drop (drop s m) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => congr_arg tail (dropn_add s m n)
#align stream.wseq.dropn_add Stream'.WSeq.dropn_add
theorem dropn_tail (s : WSeq α) (n) : drop (tail s) n = drop s (n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
symm
apply dropn_add
#align stream.wseq.dropn_tail Stream'.WSeq.dropn_tail
theorem get?_add (s : WSeq α) (m n) : get? s (m + n) = get? (drop s m) n :=
congr_arg head (dropn_add _ _ _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_add Stream'.WSeq.get?_add
theorem get?_tail (s : WSeq α) (n) : get? (tail s) n = get? s (n + 1) :=
congr_arg head (dropn_tail _ _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_tail Stream'.WSeq.get?_tail
@[simp]
theorem join_nil : join nil = (nil : WSeq α) :=
Seq.join_nil
#align stream.wseq.join_nil Stream'.WSeq.join_nil
@[simp]
theorem join_think (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : join (think S) = think (join S) := by
simp only [join, think]
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [join, Seq1.ret]
#align stream.wseq.join_think Stream'.WSeq.join_think
@[simp]
theorem join_cons (s : WSeq α) (S) : join (cons s S) = think (append s (join S)) := by
simp only [join, think]
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [join, cons, append]
#align stream.wseq.join_cons Stream'.WSeq.join_cons
@[simp]
theorem nil_append (s : WSeq α) : append nil s = s :=
Seq.nil_append _
#align stream.wseq.nil_append Stream'.WSeq.nil_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_append (a : α) (s t) : append (cons a s) t = cons a (append s t) :=
Seq.cons_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.cons_append Stream'.WSeq.cons_append
@[simp]
theorem think_append (s t : WSeq α) : append (think s) t = think (append s t) :=
Seq.cons_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.think_append Stream'.WSeq.think_append
@[simp]
theorem append_nil (s : WSeq α) : append s nil = s :=
Seq.append_nil _
#align stream.wseq.append_nil Stream'.WSeq.append_nil
@[simp]
theorem append_assoc (s t u : WSeq α) : append (append s t) u = append s (append t u) :=
Seq.append_assoc _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.append_assoc Stream'.WSeq.append_assoc
/-- auxiliary definition of tail over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def tail.aux : Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| none => Computation.pure none
| some (_, s) => destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail.aux Stream'.WSeq.tail.aux
theorem destruct_tail (s : WSeq α) : destruct (tail s) = destruct s >>= tail.aux := by
simp only [tail, destruct_flatten, tail.aux]; rw [← bind_pure_comp, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
apply congr_arg; ext1 (_ | ⟨a, s⟩) <;> apply (@pure_bind Computation _ _ _ _ _ _).trans _ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.destruct_tail Stream'.WSeq.destruct_tail
/-- auxiliary definition of drop over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def drop.aux : ℕ → Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| 0 => Computation.pure
| n + 1 => fun a => tail.aux a >>= drop.aux n
#align stream.wseq.drop.aux Stream'.WSeq.drop.aux
theorem drop.aux_none : ∀ n, @drop.aux α n none = Computation.pure none
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 =>
show Computation.bind (Computation.pure none) (drop.aux n) = Computation.pure none by
rw [ret_bind, drop.aux_none n]
#align stream.wseq.drop.aux_none Stream'.WSeq.drop.aux_none
theorem destruct_dropn : ∀ (s : WSeq α) (n), destruct (drop s n) = destruct s >>= drop.aux n
| s, 0 => (bind_pure' _).symm
| s, n + 1 => by
rw [← dropn_tail, destruct_dropn _ n, destruct_tail, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_dropn Stream'.WSeq.destruct_dropn
theorem head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates (s : WSeq α) [T : Terminates (head (tail s))] :
Terminates (head s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).2 <| by
rcases (head_terminates_iff _).1 T with ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
simp? [tail] at h says simp only [tail, destruct_flatten] at h
rcases exists_of_mem_bind h with ⟨s', h1, _⟩
unfold Functor.map at h1
exact
let ⟨t, h3, _⟩ := Computation.exists_of_mem_map h1
Computation.terminates_of_mem h3
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates
theorem destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : some a ∈ destruct (tail s)) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ destruct s := by
unfold tail Functor.map at h; simp only [destruct_flatten] at h
rcases exists_of_mem_bind h with ⟨t, tm, td⟩; clear h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map tm with ⟨t', ht', ht2⟩; clear tm
cases' t' with t' <;> rw [← ht2] at td <;> simp only [destruct_nil] at td
· have := mem_unique td (ret_mem _)
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, ht'⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some Stream'.WSeq.destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some
theorem head_some_of_head_tail_some {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : some a ∈ head (tail s)) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ head s := by
unfold head at h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map h with ⟨o, md, e⟩; clear h
cases' o with o <;> [injection e; injection e with h']; clear h'
cases' destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some md with a am
exact ⟨_, Computation.mem_map (@Prod.fst α (WSeq α) <$> ·) am⟩
#align stream.wseq.head_some_of_head_tail_some Stream'.WSeq.head_some_of_head_tail_some
theorem head_some_of_get?_some {s : WSeq α} {a n} (h : some a ∈ get? s n) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ head s := by
induction n generalizing a with
| zero => exact ⟨_, h⟩
| succ n IH =>
let ⟨a', h'⟩ := head_some_of_head_tail_some h
exact IH h'
#align stream.wseq.head_some_of_nth_some Stream'.WSeq.head_some_of_get?_some
instance productive_tail (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : Productive (tail s) :=
⟨fun n => by rw [get?_tail]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_tail Stream'.WSeq.productive_tail
instance productive_dropn (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] (n) : Productive (drop s n) :=
⟨fun m => by rw [← get?_add]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_dropn Stream'.WSeq.productive_dropn
/-- Given a productive weak sequence, we can collapse all the `think`s to
produce a sequence. -/
def toSeq (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : Seq α :=
⟨fun n => (get? s n).get,
fun {n} h => by
cases e : Computation.get (get? s (n + 1))
· assumption
have := Computation.mem_of_get_eq _ e
simp? [get?] at this h says simp only [get?] at this h
cases' head_some_of_head_tail_some this with a' h'
have := mem_unique h' (@Computation.mem_of_get_eq _ _ _ _ h)
contradiction⟩
#align stream.wseq.to_seq Stream'.WSeq.toSeq
theorem get?_terminates_le {s : WSeq α} {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
Terminates (get? s n) → Terminates (get? s m) := by
induction' h with m' _ IH
exacts [id, fun T => IH (@head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates _ _ T)]
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates_le Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates_le
theorem head_terminates_of_get?_terminates {s : WSeq α} {n} :
Terminates (get? s n) → Terminates (head s) :=
get?_terminates_le (Nat.zero_le n)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_get?_terminates
theorem destruct_terminates_of_get?_terminates {s : WSeq α} {n} (T : Terminates (get? s n)) :
Terminates (destruct s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).1 <| head_terminates_of_get?_terminates T
#align stream.wseq.destruct_terminates_of_nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.destruct_terminates_of_get?_terminates
theorem mem_rec_on {C : WSeq α → Prop} {a s} (M : a ∈ s) (h1 : ∀ b s', a = b ∨ C s' → C (cons b s'))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s := by
apply Seq.mem_rec_on M
intro o s' h; cases' o with b
· apply h2
cases h
· contradiction
· assumption
· apply h1
apply Or.imp_left _ h
intro h
injection h
#align stream.wseq.mem_rec_on Stream'.WSeq.mem_rec_on
@[simp]
theorem mem_think (s : WSeq α) (a) : a ∈ think s ↔ a ∈ s := by
cases' s with f al
change (some (some a) ∈ some none::f) ↔ some (some a) ∈ f
constructor <;> intro h
· apply (Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h).resolve_left
intro
injections
· apply Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem _ h
#align stream.wseq.mem_think Stream'.WSeq.mem_think
theorem eq_or_mem_iff_mem {s : WSeq α} {a a' s'} :
some (a', s') ∈ destruct s → (a ∈ s ↔ a = a' ∨ a ∈ s') := by
generalize e : destruct s = c; intro h
revert s
apply Computation.memRecOn h <;> [skip; intro c IH] <;> intro s <;>
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with x s s <;>
intro m <;>
have := congr_arg Computation.destruct m <;>
simp at this
· cases' this with i1 i2
rw [i1, i2]
cases' s' with f al
dsimp only [cons, (· ∈ ·), WSeq.Mem, Seq.Mem, Seq.cons]
have h_a_eq_a' : a = a' ↔ some (some a) = some (some a') := by simp
rw [h_a_eq_a']
refine ⟨Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons, fun o => ?_⟩
· cases' o with e m
· rw [e]
apply Stream'.mem_cons
· exact Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· simp [IH this]
#align stream.wseq.eq_or_mem_iff_mem Stream'.WSeq.eq_or_mem_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons_iff (s : WSeq α) (b) {a} : a ∈ cons b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
eq_or_mem_iff_mem <| by simp [ret_mem]
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons_iff Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons_iff
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {s : WSeq α} (b) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ cons b s :=
(mem_cons_iff _ _).2 (Or.inr h)
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons_of_mem
theorem mem_cons (s : WSeq α) (a) : a ∈ cons a s :=
(mem_cons_iff _ _).2 (Or.inl rfl)
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons
theorem mem_of_mem_tail {s : WSeq α} {a} : a ∈ tail s → a ∈ s := by
intro h; have := h; cases' h with n e; revert s; simp only [Stream'.get]
induction' n with n IH <;> intro s <;> induction' s using WSeq.recOn with x s s <;>
simp <;> intro m e <;>
injections
· exact Or.inr m
· exact Or.inr m
· apply IH m
rw [e]
cases tail s
rfl
#align stream.wseq.mem_of_mem_tail Stream'.WSeq.mem_of_mem_tail
theorem mem_of_mem_dropn {s : WSeq α} {a} : ∀ {n}, a ∈ drop s n → a ∈ s
| 0, h => h
| n + 1, h => @mem_of_mem_dropn s a n (mem_of_mem_tail h)
#align stream.wseq.mem_of_mem_dropn Stream'.WSeq.mem_of_mem_dropn
theorem get?_mem {s : WSeq α} {a n} : some a ∈ get? s n → a ∈ s := by
revert s; induction' n with n IH <;> intro s h
· -- Porting note: This line is required to infer metavariables in
-- `Computation.exists_of_mem_map`.
dsimp only [get?, head] at h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map h with ⟨o, h1, h2⟩
cases' o with o
· injection h2
injection h2 with h'
cases' o with a' s'
exact (eq_or_mem_iff_mem h1).2 (Or.inl h'.symm)
· have := @IH (tail s)
rw [get?_tail] at this
exact mem_of_mem_tail (this h)
#align stream.wseq.nth_mem Stream'.WSeq.get?_mem
theorem exists_get?_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, some a ∈ get? s n := by
apply mem_rec_on h
· intro a' s' h
cases' h with h h
· exists 0
simp only [get?, drop, head_cons]
rw [h]
apply ret_mem
· cases' h with n h
exists n + 1
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [get?]`.
simpa [get?]
· intro s' h
cases' h with n h
exists n
simp only [get?, dropn_think, head_think]
apply think_mem h
#align stream.wseq.exists_nth_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.exists_get?_of_mem
theorem exists_dropn_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
∃ n s', some (a, s') ∈ destruct (drop s n) :=
let ⟨n, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
⟨n, by
rcases (head_terminates_iff _).1 ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ with ⟨⟨o, om⟩⟩
have := Computation.mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ om) h
cases' o with o
· injection this
injection this with i
cases' o with a' s'
dsimp at i
rw [i] at om
exact ⟨_, om⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_dropn_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.exists_dropn_of_mem
theorem liftRel_dropn_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) :
∀ n, Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct (drop s n)) (destruct (drop t n))
| 0 => liftRel_destruct H
| n + 1 => by
simp only [LiftRelO, drop, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, destruct_tail, tail.aux]
apply liftRel_bind
· apply liftRel_dropn_destruct H n
exact fun {a b} o =>
match a, b, o with
| none, none, _ => by
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
| some (a, s), some (b, t), ⟨_, h2⟩ => by simpa [tail.aux] using liftRel_destruct h2
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_dropn_destruct Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_dropn_destruct
theorem exists_of_liftRel_left {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
∃ b, b ∈ t ∧ R a b := by
let ⟨n, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
-- Porting note: This line is required to infer metavariables in
-- `Computation.exists_of_mem_map`.
dsimp only [get?, head] at h
let ⟨some (_, s'), sd, rfl⟩ := Computation.exists_of_mem_map h
let ⟨some (b, t'), td, ⟨ab, _⟩⟩ := (liftRel_dropn_destruct H n).left sd
exact ⟨b, get?_mem (Computation.mem_map (Prod.fst.{v, v} <$> ·) td), ab⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_lift_rel_left Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_liftRel_left
theorem exists_of_liftRel_right {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) {b} (h : b ∈ t) :
∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ R a b := by rw [← LiftRel.swap] at H; exact exists_of_liftRel_left H h
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_lift_rel_right Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_liftRel_right
theorem head_terminates_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : Terminates (head s) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
head_terminates_of_get?_terminates ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_mem
theorem of_mem_append {s₁ s₂ : WSeq α} {a : α} : a ∈ append s₁ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ :=
Seq.of_mem_append
#align stream.wseq.of_mem_append Stream'.WSeq.of_mem_append
theorem mem_append_left {s₁ s₂ : WSeq α} {a : α} : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ append s₁ s₂ :=
Seq.mem_append_left
#align stream.wseq.mem_append_left Stream'.WSeq.mem_append_left
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f} {b : β} : ∀ {s : WSeq α}, b ∈ map f s → ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b
| ⟨g, al⟩, h => by
let ⟨o, om, oe⟩ := Seq.exists_of_mem_map h
cases' o with a
· injection oe
injection oe with h'
exact ⟨a, om, h'⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_mem_map Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_mem_map
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_nil (R : α → β → Prop) : LiftRel R nil nil := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff]
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_nil Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_nil
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_cons (R : α → β → Prop) (a b s t) :
LiftRel R (cons a s) (cons b t) ↔ R a b ∧ LiftRel R s t := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff]
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_cons Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_cons
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_think_left (R : α → β → Prop) (s t) : LiftRel R (think s) t ↔ LiftRel R s t := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff, liftRel_destruct_iff]; simp
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_think_left Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_think_left
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_think_right (R : α → β → Prop) (s t) : LiftRel R s (think t) ↔ LiftRel R s t := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff, liftRel_destruct_iff]; simp
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_think_right Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_think_right
theorem cons_congr {s t : WSeq α} (a : α) (h : s ~ʷ t) : cons a s ~ʷ cons a t := by
unfold Equiv; simpa using h
#align stream.wseq.cons_congr Stream'.WSeq.cons_congr
theorem think_equiv (s : WSeq α) : think s ~ʷ s := by unfold Equiv; simpa using Equiv.refl _
#align stream.wseq.think_equiv Stream'.WSeq.think_equiv
theorem think_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) : think s ~ʷ think t := by
unfold Equiv; simpa using h
#align stream.wseq.think_congr Stream'.WSeq.think_congr
theorem head_congr : ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → head s ~ head t := by
suffices ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → ∀ {o}, o ∈ head s → o ∈ head t from fun s t h o =>
⟨this h, this h.symm⟩
intro s t h o ho
rcases @Computation.exists_of_mem_map _ _ _ _ (destruct s) ho with ⟨ds, dsm, dse⟩
rw [← dse]
cases' destruct_congr h with l r
rcases l dsm with ⟨dt, dtm, dst⟩
cases' ds with a <;> cases' dt with b
· apply Computation.mem_map _ dtm
· cases b
cases dst
· cases a
cases dst
· cases' a with a s'
cases' b with b t'
rw [dst.left]
exact @Computation.mem_map _ _ (@Functor.map _ _ (α × WSeq α) _ Prod.fst)
(some (b, t')) (destruct t) dtm
#align stream.wseq.head_congr Stream'.WSeq.head_congr
theorem flatten_equiv {c : Computation (WSeq α)} {s} (h : s ∈ c) : flatten c ~ʷ s := by
apply Computation.memRecOn h
· simp [Equiv.refl]
· intro s'
apply Equiv.trans
simp [think_equiv]
#align stream.wseq.flatten_equiv Stream'.WSeq.flatten_equiv
theorem liftRel_flatten {R : α → β → Prop} {c1 : Computation (WSeq α)} {c2 : Computation (WSeq β)}
(h : c1.LiftRel (LiftRel R) c2) : LiftRel R (flatten c1) (flatten c2) :=
let S s t := ∃ c1 c2, s = flatten c1 ∧ t = flatten c2 ∧ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRel R) c1 c2
⟨S, ⟨c1, c2, rfl, rfl, h⟩, fun {s t} h =>
match s, t, h with
| _, _, ⟨c1, c2, rfl, rfl, h⟩ => by
simp only [destruct_flatten]; apply liftRel_bind _ _ h
intro a b ab; apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ (liftRel_destruct ab)
intro a b; apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t h; refine ⟨Computation.pure s, Computation.pure t, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [h, -liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_flatten Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_flatten
theorem flatten_congr {c1 c2 : Computation (WSeq α)} :
Computation.LiftRel Equiv c1 c2 → flatten c1 ~ʷ flatten c2 :=
liftRel_flatten
#align stream.wseq.flatten_congr Stream'.WSeq.flatten_congr
theorem tail_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) : tail s ~ʷ tail t := by
apply flatten_congr
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]; rw [← Computation.bind_pure, ← Computation.bind_pure]
apply liftRel_bind _ _ (destruct_congr h)
intro a b h; simp only [comp_apply, liftRel_pure]
cases' a with a <;> cases' b with b
· trivial
· cases h
· cases a
cases h
· cases' a with a s'
cases' b with b t'
exact h.right
#align stream.wseq.tail_congr Stream'.WSeq.tail_congr
theorem dropn_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) (n) : drop s n ~ʷ drop t n := by
induction n <;> simp [*, tail_congr, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_congr Stream'.WSeq.dropn_congr
theorem get?_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) (n) : get? s n ~ get? t n :=
head_congr (dropn_congr h _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_congr Stream'.WSeq.get?_congr
theorem mem_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) (a) : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ t :=
suffices ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → a ∈ s → a ∈ t from ⟨this h, this h.symm⟩
fun {_ _} h as =>
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem as
get?_mem ((get?_congr h _ _).1 hn)
#align stream.wseq.mem_congr Stream'.WSeq.mem_congr
theorem productive_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) : Productive s ↔ Productive t := by
simp only [productive_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun n => terminates_congr <| get?_congr h _
#align stream.wseq.productive_congr Stream'.WSeq.productive_congr
theorem Equiv.ext {s t : WSeq α} (h : ∀ n, get? s n ~ get? t n) : s ~ʷ t :=
⟨fun s t => ∀ n, get? s n ~ get? t n, h, fun {s t} h => by
refine liftRel_def.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← head_terminates_iff, ← head_terminates_iff]
exact terminates_congr (h 0)
· intro a b ma mb
cases' a with a <;> cases' b with b
· trivial
· injection mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (Computation.mem_map _ mb))
· injection mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (Computation.mem_map _ mb))
· cases' a with a s'
cases' b with b t'
injection mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (Computation.mem_map _ mb)) with
ab
refine ⟨ab, fun n => ?_⟩
refine
(get?_congr (flatten_equiv (Computation.mem_map _ ma)) n).symm.trans
((?_ : get? (tail s) n ~ get? (tail t) n).trans
(get?_congr (flatten_equiv (Computation.mem_map _ mb)) n))
rw [get?_tail, get?_tail]
apply h⟩
#align stream.wseq.equiv.ext Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.ext
theorem length_eq_map (s : WSeq α) : length s = Computation.map List.length (toList s) := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 =>
∃ (l : List α) (s : WSeq α),
c1 = Computation.corec (fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl n
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, s')
| some (some _, s') => Sum.inr (n + 1, s')) (l.length, s) ∧
c2 = Computation.map List.length (Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, s)))
?_ ⟨[], s, rfl, rfl⟩
intro s1 s2 h; rcases h with ⟨l, s, h⟩; rw [h.left, h.right]
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with a s s <;> simp [toList, nil, cons, think, length]
· refine ⟨a::l, s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
· refine ⟨l, s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.length_eq_map Stream'.WSeq.length_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem ofList_nil : ofList [] = (nil : WSeq α) :=
rfl
#align stream.wseq.of_list_nil Stream'.WSeq.ofList_nil
@[simp]
theorem ofList_cons (a : α) (l) : ofList (a::l) = cons a (ofList l) :=
show Seq.map some (Seq.ofList (a::l)) = Seq.cons (some a) (Seq.map some (Seq.ofList l)) by simp
#align stream.wseq.of_list_cons Stream'.WSeq.ofList_cons
@[simp]
theorem toList'_nil (l : List α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, nil) = Computation.pure l.reverse :=
destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_nil Stream'.WSeq.toList'_nil
@[simp]
theorem toList'_cons (l : List α) (s : WSeq α) (a : α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, cons a s) =
(Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (a::l, s)).think :=
destruct_eq_think <| by simp [toList, cons]
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_cons Stream'.WSeq.toList'_cons
@[simp]
theorem toList'_think (l : List α) (s : WSeq α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, think s) =
(Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, s)).think :=
destruct_eq_think <| by simp [toList, think]
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_think Stream'.WSeq.toList'_think
theorem toList'_map (l : List α) (s : WSeq α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a :: l, s')) (l, s) = (l.reverse ++ ·) <$> toList s := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 =>
∃ (l' : List α) (s : WSeq α),
c1 = Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l' ++ l, s) ∧
c2 = Computation.map (l.reverse ++ ·) (Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l', s)))
?_ ⟨[], s, rfl, rfl⟩
intro s1 s2 h; rcases h with ⟨l', s, h⟩; rw [h.left, h.right]
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with a s s <;> simp [toList, nil, cons, think, length]
· refine ⟨a::l', s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
· refine ⟨l', s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_map Stream'.WSeq.toList'_map
@[simp]
theorem toList_cons (a : α) (s) : toList (cons a s) = (List.cons a <$> toList s).think :=
destruct_eq_think <| by
unfold toList
simp only [toList'_cons, Computation.destruct_think, Sum.inr.injEq]
rw [toList'_map]
simp only [List.reverse_cons, List.reverse_nil, List.nil_append, List.singleton_append]
rfl
#align stream.wseq.to_list_cons Stream'.WSeq.toList_cons
@[simp]
theorem toList_nil : toList (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure [] :=
destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.to_list_nil Stream'.WSeq.toList_nil
theorem toList_ofList (l : List α) : l ∈ toList (ofList l) := by
induction' l with a l IH <;> simp [ret_mem]; exact think_mem (Computation.mem_map _ IH)
#align stream.wseq.to_list_of_list Stream'.WSeq.toList_ofList
@[simp]
theorem destruct_ofSeq (s : Seq α) :
destruct (ofSeq s) = Computation.pure (s.head.map fun a => (a, ofSeq s.tail)) :=
destruct_eq_pure <| by
simp only [destruct, Seq.destruct, Option.map_eq_map, ofSeq, Computation.corec_eq, rmap,
Seq.head]
rw [show Seq.get? (some <$> s) 0 = some <$> Seq.get? s 0 by apply Seq.map_get?]
cases' Seq.get? s 0 with a
· rfl
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [destruct]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.destruct_ofSeq
@[simp]
theorem head_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : head (ofSeq s) = Computation.pure s.head := by
simp only [head, Option.map_eq_map, destruct_ofSeq, Computation.map_pure, Option.map_map]
cases Seq.head s <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.head_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.head_ofSeq
@[simp]
theorem tail_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : tail (ofSeq s) = ofSeq s.tail := by
simp only [tail, destruct_ofSeq, map_pure', flatten_pure]
induction' s using Seq.recOn with x s <;> simp only [ofSeq, Seq.tail_nil, Seq.head_nil,
Option.map_none', Seq.tail_cons, Seq.head_cons, Option.map_some']
· rfl
#align stream.wseq.tail_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.tail_ofSeq
@[simp]
theorem dropn_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : ∀ n, drop (ofSeq s) n = ofSeq (s.drop n)
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
simp only [drop, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, Seq.drop]
rw [dropn_ofSeq s n, tail_ofSeq]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.dropn_ofSeq
theorem get?_ofSeq (s : Seq α) (n) : get? (ofSeq s) n = Computation.pure (Seq.get? s n) := by
dsimp [get?]; rw [dropn_ofSeq, head_ofSeq, Seq.head_dropn]
#align stream.wseq.nth_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.get?_ofSeq
instance productive_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : Productive (ofSeq s) :=
⟨fun n => by rw [get?_ofSeq]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.productive_ofSeq
theorem toSeq_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : toSeq (ofSeq s) = s := by
apply Subtype.eq; funext n
dsimp [toSeq]; apply get_eq_of_mem
rw [get?_ofSeq]; apply ret_mem
#align stream.wseq.to_seq_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.toSeq_ofSeq
/-- The monadic `return a` is a singleton list containing `a`. -/
def ret (a : α) : WSeq α :=
ofList [a]
#align stream.wseq.ret Stream'.WSeq.ret
@[simp]
theorem map_nil (f : α → β) : map f nil = nil :=
rfl
#align stream.wseq.map_nil Stream'.WSeq.map_nil
@[simp]
theorem map_cons (f : α → β) (a s) : map f (cons a s) = cons (f a) (map f s) :=
Seq.map_cons _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.map_cons Stream'.WSeq.map_cons
@[simp]
theorem map_think (f : α → β) (s) : map f (think s) = think (map f s) :=
Seq.map_cons _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.map_think Stream'.WSeq.map_think
@[simp]
theorem map_id (s : WSeq α) : map id s = s := by simp [map]
#align stream.wseq.map_id Stream'.WSeq.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_ret (f : α → β) (a) : map f (ret a) = ret (f a) := by simp [ret]
#align stream.wseq.map_ret Stream'.WSeq.map_ret
@[simp]
theorem map_append (f : α → β) (s t) : map f (append s t) = append (map f s) (map f t) :=
Seq.map_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.map_append Stream'.WSeq.map_append
theorem map_comp (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (s : WSeq α) : map (g ∘ f) s = map g (map f s) := by
dsimp [map]; rw [← Seq.map_comp]
apply congr_fun; apply congr_arg
ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.map_comp Stream'.WSeq.map_comp
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {a : α} {s : WSeq α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ map f s :=
Seq.mem_map (Option.map f)
#align stream.wseq.mem_map Stream'.WSeq.mem_map
-- The converse is not true without additional assumptions
theorem exists_of_mem_join {a : α} : ∀ {S : WSeq (WSeq α)}, a ∈ join S → ∃ s, s ∈ S ∧ a ∈ s := by
suffices
∀ ss : WSeq α,
a ∈ ss → ∀ s S, append s (join S) = ss → a ∈ append s (join S) → a ∈ s ∨ ∃ s, s ∈ S ∧ a ∈ s
from fun S h => (this _ h nil S (by simp) (by simp [h])).resolve_left (not_mem_nil _)
intro ss h; apply mem_rec_on h <;> [intro b ss o; intro ss IH] <;> intro s S
· induction' s using WSeq.recOn with b' s s <;>
[induction' S using WSeq.recOn with s S S; skip; skip] <;>
intro ej m <;> simp at ej <;> have := congr_arg Seq.destruct ej <;>
simp at this; cases this
substs b' ss
simp? at m ⊢ says simp only [cons_append, mem_cons_iff] at m ⊢
cases' o with e IH
· simp [e]
cases' m with e m
· simp [e]
exact Or.imp_left Or.inr (IH _ _ rfl m)
· induction' s using WSeq.recOn with b' s s <;>
[induction' S using WSeq.recOn with s S S; skip; skip] <;>
intro ej m <;> simp at ej <;> have := congr_arg Seq.destruct ej <;> simp at this <;>
subst ss
· apply Or.inr
-- Porting note: `exists_eq_or_imp` should be excluded.
simp [-exists_eq_or_imp] at m ⊢
cases' IH s S rfl m with as ex
· exact ⟨s, Or.inl rfl, as⟩
· rcases ex with ⟨s', sS, as⟩
exact ⟨s', Or.inr sS, as⟩
· apply Or.inr
simp? at m says simp only [join_think, nil_append, mem_think] at m
rcases (IH nil S (by simp) (by simp [m])).resolve_left (not_mem_nil _) with ⟨s, sS, as⟩
exact ⟨s, by simp [sS], as⟩
· simp only [think_append, mem_think] at m IH ⊢
apply IH _ _ rfl m
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_mem_join Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_mem_join
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {s : WSeq α} {f : α → WSeq β} {b} (h : b ∈ bind s f) :
∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a :=
let ⟨t, tm, bt⟩ := exists_of_mem_join h
let ⟨a, as, e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map tm
⟨a, as, by rwa [e]⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_mem_bind Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_mem_bind
theorem destruct_map (f : α → β) (s : WSeq α) :
destruct (map f s) = Computation.map (Option.map (Prod.map f (map f))) (destruct s) := by
apply
Computation.eq_of_bisim fun c1 c2 =>
∃ s,
c1 = destruct (map f s) ∧
c2 = Computation.map (Option.map (Prod.map f (map f))) (destruct s)
· intro c1 c2 h
cases' h with s h
rw [h.left, h.right]
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with a s s <;> simp
exact ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_map Stream'.WSeq.destruct_map
theorem liftRel_map {δ} (R : α → β → Prop) (S : γ → δ → Prop) {s1 : WSeq α} {s2 : WSeq β}
{f1 : α → γ} {f2 : β → δ} (h1 : LiftRel R s1 s2) (h2 : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S (f1 a) (f2 b)) :
LiftRel S (map f1 s1) (map f2 s2) :=
⟨fun s1 s2 => ∃ s t, s1 = map f1 s ∧ s2 = map f2 t ∧ LiftRel R s t, ⟨s1, s2, rfl, rfl, h1⟩,
fun {s1 s2} h =>
match s1, s2, h with
| _, _, ⟨s, t, rfl, rfl, h⟩ => by
simp only [exists_and_left, destruct_map]
apply Computation.liftRel_map _ _ (liftRel_destruct h)
intro o p h
cases' o with a <;> cases' p with b <;> simp
· cases b; cases h
· cases a; cases h
· cases' a with a s; cases' b with b t
cases' h with r h
exact ⟨h2 r, s, rfl, t, rfl, h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_map Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_map
theorem map_congr (f : α → β) {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) : map f s ~ʷ map f t :=
liftRel_map _ _ h fun {_ _} => congr_arg _
#align stream.wseq.map_congr Stream'.WSeq.map_congr
/-- auxiliary definition of `destruct_append` over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def destruct_append.aux (t : WSeq α) : Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| none => destruct t
| some (a, s) => Computation.pure (some (a, append s t))
#align stream.wseq.destruct_append.aux Stream'.WSeq.destruct_append.aux
theorem destruct_append (s t : WSeq α) :
destruct (append s t) = (destruct s).bind (destruct_append.aux t) := by
apply
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 =>
∃ s t, c1 = destruct (append s t) ∧ c2 = (destruct s).bind (destruct_append.aux t))
_ ⟨s, t, rfl, rfl⟩
intro c1 c2 h; rcases h with ⟨s, t, h⟩; rw [h.left, h.right]
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with a s s <;> simp
· induction' t using WSeq.recOn with b t t <;> simp
· refine ⟨nil, t, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
· exact ⟨s, t, rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_append Stream'.WSeq.destruct_append
/-- auxiliary definition of `destruct_join` over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def destruct_join.aux : Option (WSeq α × WSeq (WSeq α)) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| none => Computation.pure none
| some (s, S) => (destruct (append s (join S))).think
#align stream.wseq.destruct_join.aux Stream'.WSeq.destruct_join.aux
theorem destruct_join (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) :
destruct (join S) = (destruct S).bind destruct_join.aux := by
apply
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 =>
c1 = c2 ∨ ∃ S, c1 = destruct (join S) ∧ c2 = (destruct S).bind destruct_join.aux)
_ (Or.inr ⟨S, rfl, rfl⟩)
intro c1 c2 h
exact
match c1, c2, h with
| c, _, Or.inl <| rfl => by cases c.destruct <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨S, rfl, rfl⟩ => by
induction' S using WSeq.recOn with s S S <;> simp
· refine Or.inr ⟨S, rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_join Stream'.WSeq.destruct_join
theorem liftRel_append (R : α → β → Prop) {s1 s2 : WSeq α} {t1 t2 : WSeq β} (h1 : LiftRel R s1 t1)
(h2 : LiftRel R s2 t2) : LiftRel R (append s1 s2) (append t1 t2) :=
⟨fun s t => LiftRel R s t ∨ ∃ s1 t1, s = append s1 s2 ∧ t = append t1 t2 ∧ LiftRel R s1 t1,
Or.inr ⟨s1, t1, rfl, rfl, h1⟩, fun {s t} h =>
match s, t, h with
| s, t, Or.inl h => by
apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ (liftRel_destruct h)
intro a b; apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t; apply Or.inl
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s1, t1, rfl, rfl, h⟩ => by
simp only [LiftRelO, exists_and_left, destruct_append, destruct_append.aux]
apply Computation.liftRel_bind _ _ (liftRel_destruct h)
intro o p h
cases' o with a <;> cases' p with b
· simp only [destruct_append.aux]
apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ (liftRel_destruct h2)
intro a b
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t
apply Or.inl
· cases b; cases h
· cases a; cases h
· cases' a with a s; cases' b with b t
cases' h with r h
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simpa [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right] using ⟨r, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, t, rfl, h⟩⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_append Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_append
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 1,594 | 1,643 | theorem liftRel_join.lem (R : α → β → Prop) {S T} {U : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop}
(ST : LiftRel (LiftRel R) S T)
(HU :
∀ s1 s2,
(∃ s t S T,
s1 = append s (join S) ∧
s2 = append t (join T) ∧ LiftRel R s t ∧ LiftRel (LiftRel R) S T) →
U s1 s2)
{a} (ma : a ∈ destruct (join S)) : ∃ b, b ∈ destruct (join T) ∧ LiftRelO R U a b := by |
cases' exists_results_of_mem ma with n h; clear ma; revert S T ST a
induction' n using Nat.strongInductionOn with n IH
intro S T ST a ra; simp only [destruct_join] at ra
exact
let ⟨o, m, k, rs1, rs2, en⟩ := of_results_bind ra
let ⟨p, mT, rop⟩ := Computation.exists_of_liftRel_left (liftRel_destruct ST) rs1.mem
match o, p, rop, rs1, rs2, mT with
| none, none, _, _, rs2, mT => by
simp only [destruct_join]
exact ⟨none, mem_bind mT (ret_mem _), by rw [eq_of_pure_mem rs2.mem]; trivial⟩
| some (s, S'), some (t, T'), ⟨st, ST'⟩, _, rs2, mT => by
simp? [destruct_append] at rs2 says simp only [destruct_join.aux, destruct_append] at rs2
exact
let ⟨k1, rs3, ek⟩ := of_results_think rs2
let ⟨o', m1, n1, rs4, rs5, ek1⟩ := of_results_bind rs3
let ⟨p', mt, rop'⟩ := Computation.exists_of_liftRel_left (liftRel_destruct st) rs4.mem
match o', p', rop', rs4, rs5, mt with
| none, none, _, _, rs5', mt => by
have : n1 < n := by
rw [en, ek, ek1]
apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
apply Nat.lt_succ_of_le (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
let ⟨ob, mb, rob⟩ := IH _ this ST' rs5'
refine ⟨ob, ?_, rob⟩
· simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [destruct_join, destruct_join.aux]
apply mem_bind mT
simp only [destruct_append, destruct_append.aux]
apply think_mem
apply mem_bind mt
exact mb
| some (a, s'), some (b, t'), ⟨ab, st'⟩, _, rs5, mt => by
simp? at rs5 says simp only [destruct_append.aux] at rs5
refine ⟨some (b, append t' (join T')), ?_, ?_⟩
· simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [destruct_join, destruct_join.aux]
apply mem_bind mT
simp only [destruct_append, destruct_append.aux]
apply think_mem
apply mem_bind mt
apply ret_mem
rw [eq_of_pure_mem rs5.mem]
exact ⟨ab, HU _ _ ⟨s', t', S', T', rfl, rfl, st', ST'⟩⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Integral
#align_import ring_theory.integrally_closed from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d35b4ff446f1421bd551fafa4b8efd98ac3ac408"
/-!
# Integrally closed rings
An integrally closed ring `R` contains all the elements of `Frac(R)` that are
integral over `R`. A special case of integrally closed rings are the Dedekind domains.
## Main definitions
* `IsIntegrallyClosedIn R A` states `R` contains all integral elements of `A`
* `IsIntegrallyClosed R` states `R` contains all integral elements of `Frac(R)`
## Main results
* `isIntegrallyClosed_iff K`, where `K` is a fraction field of `R`, states `R`
is integrally closed iff it is the integral closure of `R` in `K`
## TODO: Related notions
The following definitions are closely related, especially in their applications in Mathlib.
A *normal domain* is a domain that is integrally closed in its field of fractions.
[Stacks: normal domain](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/037B#0309)
Normal domains are the major use case of `IsIntegrallyClosed` at the time of writing, and we have
quite a few results that can be moved wholesale to a new `NormalDomain` definition.
In fact, before PR #6126 `IsIntegrallyClosed` was exactly defined to be a normal domain.
(So you might want to copy some of its API when you define normal domains.)
A normal ring means that localizations at all prime ideals are normal domains.
[Stacks: normal ring](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/037B#00GV)
This implies `IsIntegrallyClosed`,
[Stacks: Tag 034M](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/037B#034M)
but is equivalent to it only under some conditions (reduced + finitely many minimal primes),
[Stacks: Tag 030C](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/037B#030C)
in which case it's also equivalent to being a finite product of normal domains.
We'd need to add these conditions if we want exactly the products of Dedekind domains.
In fact noetherianity is sufficient to guarantee finitely many minimal primes, so `IsDedekindRing`
could be defined as `IsReduced`, `IsNoetherian`, `Ring.DimensionLEOne`, and either
`IsIntegrallyClosed` or `NormalDomain`. If we use `NormalDomain` then `IsReduced` is automatic,
but we could also consider a version of `NormalDomain` that only requires the localizations are
`IsIntegrallyClosed` but may not be domains, and that may not equivalent to the ring itself being
`IsIntegallyClosed` (even for noetherian rings?).
-/
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
open Polynomial
/-- `R` is integrally closed in `A` if all integral elements of `A` are also elements of `R`.
-/
abbrev IsIntegrallyClosedIn (R A : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] :=
IsIntegralClosure R R A
/-- `R` is integrally closed if all integral elements of `Frac(R)` are also elements of `R`.
This definition uses `FractionRing R` to denote `Frac(R)`. See `isIntegrallyClosed_iff`
if you want to choose another field of fractions for `R`.
-/
abbrev IsIntegrallyClosed (R : Type*) [CommRing R] := IsIntegrallyClosedIn R (FractionRing R)
#align is_integrally_closed IsIntegrallyClosed
section Iff
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable {A B : Type*} [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
/-- Being integrally closed is preserved under injective algebra homomorphisms. -/
theorem AlgHom.isIntegrallyClosedIn (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
IsIntegrallyClosedIn R B → IsIntegrallyClosedIn R A := by
rintro ⟨inj, cl⟩
refine ⟨Function.Injective.of_comp (f := f) ?_, fun hx => ?_, ?_⟩
· convert inj
aesop
· obtain ⟨y, fx_eq⟩ := cl.mp ((isIntegral_algHom_iff f hf).mpr hx)
aesop
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
apply (isIntegral_algHom_iff f hf).mp
aesop
/-- Being integrally closed is preserved under algebra isomorphisms. -/
theorem AlgEquiv.isIntegrallyClosedIn (e : A ≃ₐ[R] B) :
IsIntegrallyClosedIn R A ↔ IsIntegrallyClosedIn R B :=
⟨AlgHom.isIntegrallyClosedIn e.symm e.symm.injective, AlgHom.isIntegrallyClosedIn e e.injective⟩
variable (K : Type*) [CommRing K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K]
/-- `R` is integrally closed iff it is the integral closure of itself in its field of fractions. -/
theorem isIntegrallyClosed_iff_isIntegrallyClosedIn :
IsIntegrallyClosed R ↔ IsIntegrallyClosedIn R K :=
(IsLocalization.algEquiv R⁰ _ _).isIntegrallyClosedIn
/-- `R` is integrally closed iff it is the integral closure of itself in its field of fractions. -/
theorem isIntegrallyClosed_iff_isIntegralClosure : IsIntegrallyClosed R ↔ IsIntegralClosure R R K :=
isIntegrallyClosed_iff_isIntegrallyClosedIn K
#align is_integrally_closed_iff_is_integral_closure isIntegrallyClosed_iff_isIntegralClosure
/-- `R` is integrally closed in `A` iff all integral elements of `A` are also elements of `R`. -/
theorem isIntegrallyClosedIn_iff {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] :
IsIntegrallyClosedIn R A ↔
Function.Injective (algebraMap R A) ∧
∀ {x : A}, IsIntegral R x → ∃ y, algebraMap R A y = x := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, cl⟩
aesop
· rintro ⟨inj, cl⟩
refine ⟨inj, by aesop, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
apply isIntegral_algebraMap
/-- `R` is integrally closed iff all integral elements of its fraction field `K`
are also elements of `R`. -/
theorem isIntegrallyClosed_iff :
IsIntegrallyClosed R ↔ ∀ {x : K}, IsIntegral R x → ∃ y, algebraMap R K y = x := by
simp [isIntegrallyClosed_iff_isIntegrallyClosedIn K, isIntegrallyClosedIn_iff,
IsFractionRing.injective R K]
#align is_integrally_closed_iff isIntegrallyClosed_iff
end Iff
namespace IsIntegrallyClosedIn
variable {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] [iic : IsIntegrallyClosedIn R A]
theorem algebraMap_eq_of_integral {x : A} : IsIntegral R x → ∃ y : R, algebraMap R A y = x :=
IsIntegralClosure.isIntegral_iff.mp
theorem isIntegral_iff {x : A} : IsIntegral R x ↔ ∃ y : R, algebraMap R A y = x :=
IsIntegralClosure.isIntegral_iff
theorem exists_algebraMap_eq_of_isIntegral_pow {x : A} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(hx : IsIntegral R <| x ^ n) : ∃ y : R, algebraMap R A y = x :=
isIntegral_iff.mp <| hx.of_pow hn
theorem exists_algebraMap_eq_of_pow_mem_subalgebra {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
{S : Subalgebra R A} [IsIntegrallyClosedIn S A] {x : A} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(hx : x ^ n ∈ S) : ∃ y : S, algebraMap S A y = x :=
exists_algebraMap_eq_of_isIntegral_pow hn <| isIntegral_iff.mpr ⟨⟨x ^ n, hx⟩, rfl⟩
variable (A)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/IntegrallyClosed.lean | 153 | 163 | theorem integralClosure_eq_bot_iff (hRA : Function.Injective (algebraMap R A)) :
integralClosure R A = ⊥ ↔ IsIntegrallyClosedIn R A := by |
refine eq_bot_iff.trans ?_
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨ hRA, fun hx => Set.mem_range.mp (Algebra.mem_bot.mp (h hx)), ?_⟩
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
apply isIntegral_algebraMap
· intro h x hx
rw [Algebra.mem_bot, Set.mem_range]
exact isIntegral_iff.mp hx
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mitchell Rowett, Scott Morrison, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro,
Michael Howes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Deprecated.Submonoid
#align_import deprecated.subgroup from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f93c11933efbc3c2f0299e47b8ff83e9b539cbf6"
/-!
# Unbundled subgroups (deprecated)
This file is deprecated, and is no longer imported by anything in mathlib other than other
deprecated files, and test files. You should not need to import it.
This file defines unbundled multiplicative and additive subgroups. Instead of using this file,
please use `Subgroup G` and `AddSubgroup A`, defined in `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic`.
## Main definitions
`IsAddSubgroup (S : Set A)` : the predicate that `S` is the underlying subset of an additive
subgroup of `A`. The bundled variant `AddSubgroup A` should be used in preference to this.
`IsSubgroup (S : Set G)` : the predicate that `S` is the underlying subset of a subgroup
of `G`. The bundled variant `Subgroup G` should be used in preference to this.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups, IsSubgroup
-/
open Set Function
variable {G : Type*} {H : Type*} {A : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b c : G}
section Group
variable [Group G] [AddGroup A]
/-- `s` is an additive subgroup: a set containing 0 and closed under addition and negation. -/
structure IsAddSubgroup (s : Set A) extends IsAddSubmonoid s : Prop where
/-- The proposition that `s` is closed under negation. -/
neg_mem {a} : a ∈ s → -a ∈ s
#align is_add_subgroup IsAddSubgroup
/-- `s` is a subgroup: a set containing 1 and closed under multiplication and inverse. -/
@[to_additive]
structure IsSubgroup (s : Set G) extends IsSubmonoid s : Prop where
/-- The proposition that `s` is closed under inverse. -/
inv_mem {a} : a ∈ s → a⁻¹ ∈ s
#align is_subgroup IsSubgroup
@[to_additive]
theorem IsSubgroup.div_mem {s : Set G} (hs : IsSubgroup s) {x y : G} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) :
x / y ∈ s := by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hs.mul_mem hx (hs.inv_mem hy)
#align is_subgroup.div_mem IsSubgroup.div_mem
#align is_add_subgroup.sub_mem IsAddSubgroup.sub_mem
theorem Additive.isAddSubgroup {s : Set G} (hs : IsSubgroup s) : @IsAddSubgroup (Additive G) _ s :=
@IsAddSubgroup.mk (Additive G) _ _ (Additive.isAddSubmonoid hs.toIsSubmonoid) hs.inv_mem
#align additive.is_add_subgroup Additive.isAddSubgroup
theorem Additive.isAddSubgroup_iff {s : Set G} : @IsAddSubgroup (Additive G) _ s ↔ IsSubgroup s :=
⟨by rintro ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩; exact @IsSubgroup.mk G _ _ ⟨h₁, @h₂⟩ @h₃, fun h =>
Additive.isAddSubgroup h⟩
#align additive.is_add_subgroup_iff Additive.isAddSubgroup_iff
theorem Multiplicative.isSubgroup {s : Set A} (hs : IsAddSubgroup s) :
@IsSubgroup (Multiplicative A) _ s :=
@IsSubgroup.mk (Multiplicative A) _ _ (Multiplicative.isSubmonoid hs.toIsAddSubmonoid) hs.neg_mem
#align multiplicative.is_subgroup Multiplicative.isSubgroup
theorem Multiplicative.isSubgroup_iff {s : Set A} :
@IsSubgroup (Multiplicative A) _ s ↔ IsAddSubgroup s :=
⟨by rintro ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩; exact @IsAddSubgroup.mk A _ _ ⟨h₁, @h₂⟩ @h₃, fun h =>
Multiplicative.isSubgroup h⟩
#align multiplicative.is_subgroup_iff Multiplicative.isSubgroup_iff
@[to_additive of_add_neg]
theorem IsSubgroup.of_div (s : Set G) (one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ s)
(div_mem : ∀ {a b : G}, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a * b⁻¹ ∈ s) : IsSubgroup s :=
have inv_mem : ∀ a, a ∈ s → a⁻¹ ∈ s := fun a ha => by
have : 1 * a⁻¹ ∈ s := div_mem one_mem ha
convert this using 1
rw [one_mul]
{ inv_mem := inv_mem _
mul_mem := fun {a b} ha hb => by
have : a * b⁻¹⁻¹ ∈ s := div_mem ha (inv_mem b hb)
convert this
rw [inv_inv]
one_mem }
#align is_subgroup.of_div IsSubgroup.of_div
#align is_add_subgroup.of_add_neg IsAddSubgroup.of_add_neg
theorem IsAddSubgroup.of_sub (s : Set A) (zero_mem : (0 : A) ∈ s)
(sub_mem : ∀ {a b : A}, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a - b ∈ s) : IsAddSubgroup s :=
IsAddSubgroup.of_add_neg s zero_mem fun {x y} hx hy => by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using sub_mem hx hy
#align is_add_subgroup.of_sub IsAddSubgroup.of_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem IsSubgroup.inter {s₁ s₂ : Set G} (hs₁ : IsSubgroup s₁) (hs₂ : IsSubgroup s₂) :
IsSubgroup (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
{ IsSubmonoid.inter hs₁.toIsSubmonoid hs₂.toIsSubmonoid with
inv_mem := fun hx => ⟨hs₁.inv_mem hx.1, hs₂.inv_mem hx.2⟩ }
#align is_subgroup.inter IsSubgroup.inter
#align is_add_subgroup.inter IsAddSubgroup.inter
@[to_additive]
theorem IsSubgroup.iInter {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set G} (hs : ∀ y : ι, IsSubgroup (s y)) :
IsSubgroup (Set.iInter s) :=
{ IsSubmonoid.iInter fun y => (hs y).toIsSubmonoid with
inv_mem := fun h =>
Set.mem_iInter.2 fun y => IsSubgroup.inv_mem (hs _) (Set.mem_iInter.1 h y) }
#align is_subgroup.Inter IsSubgroup.iInter
#align is_add_subgroup.Inter IsAddSubgroup.iInter
@[to_additive]
theorem isSubgroup_iUnion_of_directed {ι : Type*} [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set G}
(hs : ∀ i, IsSubgroup (s i)) (directed : ∀ i j, ∃ k, s i ⊆ s k ∧ s j ⊆ s k) :
IsSubgroup (⋃ i, s i) :=
{ inv_mem := fun ha =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.1 ha
Set.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, (hs i).inv_mem hi⟩
toIsSubmonoid := isSubmonoid_iUnion_of_directed (fun i => (hs i).toIsSubmonoid) directed }
#align is_subgroup_Union_of_directed isSubgroup_iUnion_of_directed
#align is_add_subgroup_Union_of_directed isAddSubgroup_iUnion_of_directed
end Group
namespace IsSubgroup
open IsSubmonoid
variable [Group G] {s : Set G} (hs : IsSubgroup s)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_iff : a⁻¹ ∈ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using hs.inv_mem h, inv_mem hs⟩
#align is_subgroup.inv_mem_iff IsSubgroup.inv_mem_iff
#align is_add_subgroup.neg_mem_iff IsAddSubgroup.neg_mem_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_cancel_right (h : a ∈ s) : b * a ∈ s ↔ b ∈ s :=
⟨fun hba => by simpa using hs.mul_mem hba (hs.inv_mem h), fun hb => hs.mul_mem hb h⟩
#align is_subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right IsSubgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right
#align is_add_subgroup.add_mem_cancel_right IsAddSubgroup.add_mem_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_cancel_left (h : a ∈ s) : a * b ∈ s ↔ b ∈ s :=
⟨fun hab => by simpa using hs.mul_mem (hs.inv_mem h) hab, hs.mul_mem h⟩
#align is_subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left IsSubgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left
#align is_add_subgroup.add_mem_cancel_left IsAddSubgroup.add_mem_cancel_left
end IsSubgroup
/-- `IsNormalAddSubgroup (s : Set A)` expresses the fact that `s` is a normal additive subgroup
of the additive group `A`. Important: the preferred way to say this in Lean is via bundled
subgroups `S : AddSubgroup A` and `hs : S.normal`, and not via this structure. -/
structure IsNormalAddSubgroup [AddGroup A] (s : Set A) extends IsAddSubgroup s : Prop where
/-- The proposition that `s` is closed under (additive) conjugation. -/
normal : ∀ n ∈ s, ∀ g : A, g + n + -g ∈ s
#align is_normal_add_subgroup IsNormalAddSubgroup
/-- `IsNormalSubgroup (s : Set G)` expresses the fact that `s` is a normal subgroup
of the group `G`. Important: the preferred way to say this in Lean is via bundled
subgroups `S : Subgroup G` and not via this structure. -/
@[to_additive]
structure IsNormalSubgroup [Group G] (s : Set G) extends IsSubgroup s : Prop where
/-- The proposition that `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
normal : ∀ n ∈ s, ∀ g : G, g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ s
#align is_normal_subgroup IsNormalSubgroup
@[to_additive]
theorem isNormalSubgroup_of_commGroup [CommGroup G] {s : Set G} (hs : IsSubgroup s) :
IsNormalSubgroup s :=
{ hs with normal := fun n hn g => by rwa [mul_right_comm, mul_right_inv, one_mul] }
#align is_normal_subgroup_of_comm_group isNormalSubgroup_of_commGroup
#align is_normal_add_subgroup_of_add_comm_group isNormalAddSubgroup_of_addCommGroup
theorem Additive.isNormalAddSubgroup [Group G] {s : Set G} (hs : IsNormalSubgroup s) :
@IsNormalAddSubgroup (Additive G) _ s :=
@IsNormalAddSubgroup.mk (Additive G) _ _ (Additive.isAddSubgroup hs.toIsSubgroup)
(@IsNormalSubgroup.normal _ ‹Group (Additive G)› _ hs)
-- Porting note: Lean needs help synthesising
#align additive.is_normal_add_subgroup Additive.isNormalAddSubgroup
theorem Additive.isNormalAddSubgroup_iff [Group G] {s : Set G} :
@IsNormalAddSubgroup (Additive G) _ s ↔ IsNormalSubgroup s :=
⟨by rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩; exact @IsNormalSubgroup.mk G _ _ (Additive.isAddSubgroup_iff.1 h₁) @h₂,
fun h => Additive.isNormalAddSubgroup h⟩
#align additive.is_normal_add_subgroup_iff Additive.isNormalAddSubgroup_iff
theorem Multiplicative.isNormalSubgroup [AddGroup A] {s : Set A} (hs : IsNormalAddSubgroup s) :
@IsNormalSubgroup (Multiplicative A) _ s :=
@IsNormalSubgroup.mk (Multiplicative A) _ _ (Multiplicative.isSubgroup hs.toIsAddSubgroup)
(@IsNormalAddSubgroup.normal _ ‹AddGroup (Multiplicative A)› _ hs)
#align multiplicative.is_normal_subgroup Multiplicative.isNormalSubgroup
theorem Multiplicative.isNormalSubgroup_iff [AddGroup A] {s : Set A} :
@IsNormalSubgroup (Multiplicative A) _ s ↔ IsNormalAddSubgroup s :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩;
exact @IsNormalAddSubgroup.mk A _ _ (Multiplicative.isSubgroup_iff.1 h₁) @h₂,
fun h => Multiplicative.isNormalSubgroup h⟩
#align multiplicative.is_normal_subgroup_iff Multiplicative.isNormalSubgroup_iff
namespace IsSubgroup
variable [Group G]
-- Normal subgroup properties
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_norm_comm {s : Set G} (hs : IsNormalSubgroup s) {a b : G} (hab : a * b ∈ s) :
b * a ∈ s := by
have h : a⁻¹ * (a * b) * a⁻¹⁻¹ ∈ s := hs.normal (a * b) hab a⁻¹
simp at h; exact h
#align is_subgroup.mem_norm_comm IsSubgroup.mem_norm_comm
#align is_add_subgroup.mem_norm_comm IsAddSubgroup.mem_norm_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_norm_comm_iff {s : Set G} (hs : IsNormalSubgroup s) {a b : G} : a * b ∈ s ↔ b * a ∈ s :=
⟨mem_norm_comm hs, mem_norm_comm hs⟩
#align is_subgroup.mem_norm_comm_iff IsSubgroup.mem_norm_comm_iff
#align is_add_subgroup.mem_norm_comm_iff IsAddSubgroup.mem_norm_comm_iff
/-- The trivial subgroup -/
@[to_additive "the trivial additive subgroup"]
def trivial (G : Type*) [Group G] : Set G :=
{1}
#align is_subgroup.trivial IsSubgroup.trivial
#align is_add_subgroup.trivial IsAddSubgroup.trivial
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_trivial {g : G} : g ∈ trivial G ↔ g = 1 :=
mem_singleton_iff
#align is_subgroup.mem_trivial IsSubgroup.mem_trivial
#align is_add_subgroup.mem_trivial IsAddSubgroup.mem_trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem trivial_normal : IsNormalSubgroup (trivial G) := by refine ⟨⟨⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ <;> simp
#align is_subgroup.trivial_normal IsSubgroup.trivial_normal
#align is_add_subgroup.trivial_normal IsAddSubgroup.trivial_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_trivial_iff {s : Set G} (hs : IsSubgroup s) : s = trivial G ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x = (1 : G) := by
simp only [Set.ext_iff, IsSubgroup.mem_trivial];
exact ⟨fun h x => (h x).1, fun h x => ⟨h x, fun hx => hx.symm ▸ hs.toIsSubmonoid.one_mem⟩⟩
#align is_subgroup.eq_trivial_iff IsSubgroup.eq_trivial_iff
#align is_add_subgroup.eq_trivial_iff IsAddSubgroup.eq_trivial_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem univ_subgroup : IsNormalSubgroup (@univ G) := by refine ⟨⟨⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ <;> simp
#align is_subgroup.univ_subgroup IsSubgroup.univ_subgroup
#align is_add_subgroup.univ_add_subgroup IsAddSubgroup.univ_addSubgroup
/-- The underlying set of the center of a group. -/
@[to_additive addCenter "The underlying set of the center of an additive group."]
def center (G : Type*) [Group G] : Set G :=
{ z | ∀ g, g * z = z * g }
#align is_subgroup.center IsSubgroup.center
#align is_add_subgroup.add_center IsAddSubgroup.addCenter
@[to_additive mem_add_center]
theorem mem_center {a : G} : a ∈ center G ↔ ∀ g, g * a = a * g :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_subgroup.mem_center IsSubgroup.mem_center
#align is_add_subgroup.mem_add_center IsAddSubgroup.mem_add_center
@[to_additive add_center_normal]
theorem center_normal : IsNormalSubgroup (center G) :=
{ one_mem := by simp [center]
mul_mem := fun ha hb g => by
rw [← mul_assoc, mem_center.2 ha g, mul_assoc, mem_center.2 hb g, ← mul_assoc]
inv_mem := fun {a} ha g =>
calc
g * a⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * (g * a) * a⁻¹ := by simp [ha g]
_ = a⁻¹ * g := by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_assoc]; simp
normal := fun n ha g h =>
calc
h * (g * n * g⁻¹) = h * n := by simp [ha g, mul_assoc]
_ = g * g⁻¹ * n * h := by rw [ha h]; simp
_ = g * n * g⁻¹ * h := by rw [mul_assoc g, ha g⁻¹, ← mul_assoc]
}
#align is_subgroup.center_normal IsSubgroup.center_normal
#align is_add_subgroup.add_center_normal IsAddSubgroup.add_center_normal
/-- The underlying set of the normalizer of a subset `S : Set G` of a group `G`. That is,
the elements `g : G` such that `g * S * g⁻¹ = S`. -/
@[to_additive addNormalizer
"The underlying set of the normalizer of a subset `S : Set A` of an
additive group `A`. That is, the elements `a : A` such that `a + S - a = S`."]
def normalizer (s : Set G) : Set G :=
{ g : G | ∀ n, n ∈ s ↔ g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ s }
#align is_subgroup.normalizer IsSubgroup.normalizer
#align is_add_subgroup.add_normalizer IsAddSubgroup.addNormalizer
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_isSubgroup (s : Set G) : IsSubgroup (normalizer s) :=
{ one_mem := by simp [normalizer]
mul_mem := fun {a b}
(ha : ∀ n, n ∈ s ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ s) (hb : ∀ n, n ∈ s ↔ b * n * b⁻¹ ∈ s) n =>
by rw [mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, mul_assoc a, mul_assoc a, ← ha, ← hb]
inv_mem := fun {a} (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ s ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ s) n => by
rw [ha (a⁻¹ * n * a⁻¹⁻¹)]; simp [mul_assoc] }
#align is_subgroup.normalizer_is_subgroup IsSubgroup.normalizer_isSubgroup
#align is_add_subgroup.normalizer_is_add_subgroup IsAddSubgroup.normalizer_isAddSubgroup
@[to_additive subset_add_normalizer]
theorem subset_normalizer {s : Set G} (hs : IsSubgroup s) : s ⊆ normalizer s := fun g hg n => by
rw [IsSubgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right hs ((IsSubgroup.inv_mem_iff hs).2 hg),
IsSubgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left hs hg]
#align is_subgroup.subset_normalizer IsSubgroup.subset_normalizer
#align is_add_subgroup.subset_add_normalizer IsAddSubgroup.subset_add_normalizer
end IsSubgroup
-- Homomorphism subgroups
namespace IsGroupHom
open IsSubmonoid IsSubgroup
/-- `ker f : Set G` is the underlying subset of the kernel of a map `G → H`. -/
@[to_additive "`ker f : Set A` is the underlying subset of the kernel of a map `A → B`"]
def ker [Group H] (f : G → H) : Set G :=
preimage f (trivial H)
#align is_group_hom.ker IsGroupHom.ker
#align is_add_group_hom.ker IsAddGroupHom.ker
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_ker [Group H] (f : G → H) {x : G} : x ∈ ker f ↔ f x = 1 :=
mem_trivial
#align is_group_hom.mem_ker IsGroupHom.mem_ker
#align is_add_group_hom.mem_ker IsAddGroupHom.mem_ker
variable [Group G] [Group H]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_ker_inv {f : G → H} (hf : IsGroupHom f) {a b : G} (h : f (a * b⁻¹) = 1) :
f a = f b := by
rw [hf.map_mul, hf.map_inv] at h
rw [← inv_inv (f b), eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h]
#align is_group_hom.one_ker_inv IsGroupHom.one_ker_inv
#align is_add_group_hom.zero_ker_neg IsAddGroupHom.zero_ker_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem one_ker_inv' {f : G → H} (hf : IsGroupHom f) {a b : G} (h : f (a⁻¹ * b) = 1) :
f a = f b := by
rw [hf.map_mul, hf.map_inv] at h
apply inv_injective
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h]
#align is_group_hom.one_ker_inv' IsGroupHom.one_ker_inv'
#align is_add_group_hom.zero_ker_neg' IsAddGroupHom.zero_ker_neg'
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Deprecated/Subgroup.lean | 359 | 362 | theorem inv_ker_one {f : G → H} (hf : IsGroupHom f) {a b : G} (h : f a = f b) :
f (a * b⁻¹) = 1 := by |
have : f a * (f b)⁻¹ = 1 := by rw [h, mul_right_inv]
rwa [← hf.map_inv, ← hf.map_mul] at this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Fin
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient
#align_import ring_theory.ideal.quotient_operations from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b88d81c84530450a8989e918608e5960f015e6c8"
/-!
# More operations on modules and ideals related to quotients
## Main results:
- `RingHom.quotientKerEquivRange` : the **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings.
- `RingHom.quotientKerEquivRangeS` : the **first isomorphism theorem**
for a morphism from a commutative ring to a semiring.
- `AlgHom.quotientKerEquivRange` : the **first isomorphism theorem**
for a morphism of algebras (over a commutative semiring)
- `RingHom.quotientKerEquivRangeS` : the **first isomorphism theorem**
for a morphism from a commutative ring to a semiring.
- `Ideal.quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient`: the **Chinese Remainder Theorem**, version for coprime
ideals (see also `ZMod.prodEquivPi` in `Data.ZMod.Quotient` for elementary versions about
`ZMod`).
-/
universe u v w
namespace RingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [CommRing R] [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S)
/-- The induced map from the quotient by the kernel to the codomain.
This is an isomorphism if `f` has a right inverse (`quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse`) /
is surjective (`quotientKerEquivOfSurjective`).
-/
def kerLift : R ⧸ ker f →+* S :=
Ideal.Quotient.lift _ f fun _ => f.mem_ker.mp
#align ring_hom.ker_lift RingHom.kerLift
@[simp]
theorem kerLift_mk (r : R) : kerLift f (Ideal.Quotient.mk (ker f) r) = f r :=
Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk _ _ _
#align ring_hom.ker_lift_mk RingHom.kerLift_mk
theorem lift_injective_of_ker_le_ideal (I : Ideal R) {f : R →+* S} (H : ∀ a : R, a ∈ I → f a = 0)
(hI : ker f ≤ I) : Function.Injective (Ideal.Quotient.lift I f H) := by
rw [RingHom.injective_iff_ker_eq_bot, RingHom.ker_eq_bot_iff_eq_zero]
intro u hu
obtain ⟨v, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective u
rw [Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk] at hu
rw [Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
exact hI ((RingHom.mem_ker f).mpr hu)
#align ring_hom.lift_injective_of_ker_le_ideal RingHom.lift_injective_of_ker_le_ideal
/-- The induced map from the quotient by the kernel is injective. -/
theorem kerLift_injective : Function.Injective (kerLift f) :=
lift_injective_of_ker_le_ideal (ker f) (fun a => by simp only [mem_ker, imp_self]) le_rfl
#align ring_hom.ker_lift_injective RingHom.kerLift_injective
variable {f}
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem for commutative rings**, computable version. -/
def quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse {g : S → R} (hf : Function.RightInverse g f) :
R ⧸ ker f ≃+* S :=
{ kerLift f with
toFun := kerLift f
invFun := Ideal.Quotient.mk (ker f) ∘ g
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply kerLift_injective
simp only [Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk, Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk, kerLift_mk,
Function.comp_apply, hf (f x)]
right_inv := hf }
#align ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse
@[simp]
theorem quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse.apply {g : S → R} (hf : Function.RightInverse g f)
(x : R ⧸ ker f) : quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse hf x = kerLift f x :=
rfl
#align ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse.apply RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse.apply
@[simp]
theorem quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse.Symm.apply {g : S → R} (hf : Function.RightInverse g f)
(x : S) : (quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse hf).symm x = Ideal.Quotient.mk (ker f) (g x) :=
rfl
#align ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse.symm.apply RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse.Symm.apply
variable (R) in
/-- The quotient of a ring by he zero ideal is isomorphic to the ring itself. -/
def _root_.RingEquiv.quotientBot : R ⧸ (⊥ : Ideal R) ≃+* R :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq (RingHom.ker_coe_equiv <| .refl _).symm).trans <|
quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse (f := .id R) (g := _root_.id) fun _ ↦ rfl
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings, surjective case. -/
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) : R ⧸ (ker f) ≃+* S :=
quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse (Classical.choose_spec hf.hasRightInverse)
#align ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_surjective RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfSurjective
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings (`RingHom.rangeS` version). -/
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivRangeS (f : R →+* S) : R ⧸ ker f ≃+* f.rangeS :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq f.ker_rangeSRestrict.symm).trans <|
quotientKerEquivOfSurjective f.rangeSRestrict_surjective
variable {S : Type v} [Ring S] (f : R →+* S)
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings (`RingHom.range` version). -/
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivRange (f : R →+* S) : R ⧸ ker f ≃+* f.range :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq f.ker_rangeRestrict.symm).trans <|
quotientKerEquivOfSurjective f.rangeRestrict_surjective
end RingHom
namespace Ideal
open Function RingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {F : Type w} [CommRing R] [Semiring S]
@[simp]
theorem map_quotient_self (I : Ideal R) : map (Quotient.mk I) I = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <|
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap.2 fun _ hx =>
(Submodule.mem_bot (R ⧸ I)).2 <| Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.2 hx
#align ideal.map_quotient_self Ideal.map_quotient_self
@[simp]
theorem mk_ker {I : Ideal R} : ker (Quotient.mk I) = I := by
ext
rw [ker, mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot, Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
#align ideal.mk_ker Ideal.mk_ker
theorem map_mk_eq_bot_of_le {I J : Ideal R} (h : I ≤ J) : I.map (Quotient.mk J) = ⊥ := by
rw [map_eq_bot_iff_le_ker, mk_ker]
exact h
#align ideal.map_mk_eq_bot_of_le Ideal.map_mk_eq_bot_of_le
theorem ker_quotient_lift {I : Ideal R} (f : R →+* S)
(H : I ≤ ker f) :
ker (Ideal.Quotient.lift I f H) = f.ker.map (Quotient.mk I) := by
apply Ideal.ext
intro x
constructor
· intro hx
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := Quotient.mk_surjective x
rw [mem_ker, ← hy, Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk, ← mem_ker] at hx
rw [← hy, mem_map_iff_of_surjective (Quotient.mk I) Quotient.mk_surjective]
exact ⟨y, hx, rfl⟩
· intro hx
rw [mem_map_iff_of_surjective (Quotient.mk I) Quotient.mk_surjective] at hx
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx
rw [mem_ker, ← hy.right, Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk]
exact hy.left
#align ideal.ker_quotient_lift Ideal.ker_quotient_lift
lemma injective_lift_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R →+* S} (H : ∀ (a : R), a ∈ I → f a = 0) :
Injective (Quotient.lift I f H) ↔ ker f = I := by
rw [injective_iff_ker_eq_bot, ker_quotient_lift, map_eq_bot_iff_le_ker, mk_ker]
constructor
· exact fun h ↦ le_antisymm h H
· rintro rfl; rfl
lemma ker_Pi_Quotient_mk {ι : Type*} (I : ι → Ideal R) :
ker (Pi.ringHom fun i : ι ↦ Quotient.mk (I i)) = ⨅ i, I i := by
simp [Pi.ker_ringHom, mk_ker]
@[simp]
theorem bot_quotient_isMaximal_iff (I : Ideal R) : (⊥ : Ideal (R ⧸ I)).IsMaximal ↔ I.IsMaximal :=
⟨fun hI =>
mk_ker (I := I) ▸
comap_isMaximal_of_surjective (Quotient.mk I) Quotient.mk_surjective (K := ⊥) (H := hI),
fun hI => by
letI := Quotient.field I
exact bot_isMaximal⟩
#align ideal.bot_quotient_is_maximal_iff Ideal.bot_quotient_isMaximal_iff
/-- See also `Ideal.mem_quotient_iff_mem` in case `I ≤ J`. -/
@[simp]
theorem mem_quotient_iff_mem_sup {I J : Ideal R} {x : R} :
Quotient.mk I x ∈ J.map (Quotient.mk I) ↔ x ∈ J ⊔ I := by
rw [← mem_comap, comap_map_of_surjective (Quotient.mk I) Quotient.mk_surjective, ←
ker_eq_comap_bot, mk_ker]
#align ideal.mem_quotient_iff_mem_sup Ideal.mem_quotient_iff_mem_sup
/-- See also `Ideal.mem_quotient_iff_mem_sup` if the assumption `I ≤ J` is not available. -/
theorem mem_quotient_iff_mem {I J : Ideal R} (hIJ : I ≤ J) {x : R} :
Quotient.mk I x ∈ J.map (Quotient.mk I) ↔ x ∈ J := by
rw [mem_quotient_iff_mem_sup, sup_eq_left.mpr hIJ]
#align ideal.mem_quotient_iff_mem Ideal.mem_quotient_iff_mem
section ChineseRemainder
open Function Quotient Finset
variable {ι : Type*}
/-- The homomorphism from `R/(⋂ i, f i)` to `∏ i, (R / f i)` featured in the Chinese
Remainder Theorem. It is bijective if the ideals `f i` are coprime. -/
def quotientInfToPiQuotient (I : ι → Ideal R) : (R ⧸ ⨅ i, I i) →+* ∀ i, R ⧸ I i :=
Quotient.lift (⨅ i, I i) (Pi.ringHom fun i : ι ↦ Quotient.mk (I i))
(by simp [← RingHom.mem_ker, ker_Pi_Quotient_mk])
lemma quotientInfToPiQuotient_mk (I : ι → Ideal R) (x : R) :
quotientInfToPiQuotient I (Quotient.mk _ x) = fun i : ι ↦ Quotient.mk (I i) x :=
rfl
lemma quotientInfToPiQuotient_mk' (I : ι → Ideal R) (x : R) (i : ι) :
quotientInfToPiQuotient I (Quotient.mk _ x) i = Quotient.mk (I i) x :=
rfl
lemma quotientInfToPiQuotient_inj (I : ι → Ideal R) : Injective (quotientInfToPiQuotient I) := by
rw [quotientInfToPiQuotient, injective_lift_iff, ker_Pi_Quotient_mk]
lemma quotientInfToPiQuotient_surj [Finite ι] {I : ι → Ideal R}
(hI : Pairwise fun i j => IsCoprime (I i) (I j)) : Surjective (quotientInfToPiQuotient I) := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype ι
intro g
choose f hf using fun i ↦ mk_surjective (g i)
have key : ∀ i, ∃ e : R, mk (I i) e = 1 ∧ ∀ j, j ≠ i → mk (I j) e = 0 := by
intro i
have hI' : ∀ j ∈ ({i} : Finset ι)ᶜ, IsCoprime (I i) (I j) := by
intros j hj
exact hI (by simpa [ne_comm, isCoprime_iff_add] using hj)
rcases isCoprime_iff_exists.mp (isCoprime_biInf hI') with ⟨u, hu, e, he, hue⟩
replace he : ∀ j, j ≠ i → e ∈ I j := by simpa using he
refine ⟨e, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp [eq_sub_of_add_eq' hue, map_sub, eq_zero_iff_mem.mpr hu]
· exact fun j hj ↦ eq_zero_iff_mem.mpr (he j hj)
choose e he using key
use mk _ (∑ i, f i*e i)
ext i
rw [quotientInfToPiQuotient_mk', map_sum, Fintype.sum_eq_single i]
· simp [(he i).1, hf]
· intros j hj
simp [(he j).2 i hj.symm]
/-- **Chinese Remainder Theorem**. Eisenbud Ex.2.6.
Similar to Atiyah-Macdonald 1.10 and Stacks 00DT -/
noncomputable def quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient [Finite ι] (f : ι → Ideal R)
(hf : Pairwise fun i j => IsCoprime (f i) (f j)) : (R ⧸ ⨅ i, f i) ≃+* ∀ i, R ⧸ f i :=
{ Equiv.ofBijective _ ⟨quotientInfToPiQuotient_inj f, quotientInfToPiQuotient_surj hf⟩,
quotientInfToPiQuotient f with }
#align ideal.quotient_inf_ring_equiv_pi_quotient Ideal.quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient
/-- Corollary of Chinese Remainder Theorem: if `Iᵢ` are pairwise coprime ideals in a
commutative ring then the canonical map `R → ∏ (R ⧸ Iᵢ)` is surjective. -/
lemma pi_quotient_surjective {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {I : ι → Ideal R}
(hf : Pairwise fun i j ↦ IsCoprime (I i) (I j)) (x : (i : ι) → R ⧸ I i) :
∃ r : R, ∀ i, r = x i := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := Ideal.quotientInfToPiQuotient_surj hf x
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective y
exact ⟨r, fun i ↦ rfl⟩
-- variant of `IsDedekindDomain.exists_forall_sub_mem_ideal` which doesn't assume Dedekind domain!
/-- Corollary of Chinese Remainder Theorem: if `Iᵢ` are pairwise coprime ideals in a
commutative ring then given elements `xᵢ` you can find `r` with `r - xᵢ ∈ Iᵢ` for all `i`. -/
lemma exists_forall_sub_mem_ideal {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {ι : Type*} [Finite ι]
{I : ι → Ideal R} (hI : Pairwise fun i j ↦ IsCoprime (I i) (I j)) (x : ι → R) :
∃ r : R, ∀ i, r - x i ∈ I i := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := Ideal.pi_quotient_surjective hI (fun i ↦ x i)
exact ⟨y, fun i ↦ (Submodule.Quotient.eq (I i)).mp <| hy i⟩
/-- **Chinese remainder theorem**, specialized to two ideals. -/
noncomputable def quotientInfEquivQuotientProd (I J : Ideal R) (coprime : IsCoprime I J) :
R ⧸ I ⊓ J ≃+* (R ⧸ I) × R ⧸ J :=
let f : Fin 2 → Ideal R := ![I, J]
have hf : Pairwise fun i j => IsCoprime (f i) (f j) := by
intro i j h
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> try contradiction
· assumption
· exact coprime.symm
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq (by simp [f, iInf, inf_comm])).trans <|
(Ideal.quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient f hf).trans <| RingEquiv.piFinTwo fun i => R ⧸ f i
#align ideal.quotient_inf_equiv_quotient_prod Ideal.quotientInfEquivQuotientProd
@[simp]
theorem quotientInfEquivQuotientProd_fst (I J : Ideal R) (coprime : IsCoprime I J) (x : R ⧸ I ⊓ J) :
(quotientInfEquivQuotientProd I J coprime x).fst =
Ideal.Quotient.factor (I ⊓ J) I inf_le_left x :=
Quot.inductionOn x fun _ => rfl
#align ideal.quotient_inf_equiv_quotient_prod_fst Ideal.quotientInfEquivQuotientProd_fst
@[simp]
theorem quotientInfEquivQuotientProd_snd (I J : Ideal R) (coprime : IsCoprime I J) (x : R ⧸ I ⊓ J) :
(quotientInfEquivQuotientProd I J coprime x).snd =
Ideal.Quotient.factor (I ⊓ J) J inf_le_right x :=
Quot.inductionOn x fun _ => rfl
#align ideal.quotient_inf_equiv_quotient_prod_snd Ideal.quotientInfEquivQuotientProd_snd
@[simp]
theorem fst_comp_quotientInfEquivQuotientProd (I J : Ideal R) (coprime : IsCoprime I J) :
(RingHom.fst _ _).comp
(quotientInfEquivQuotientProd I J coprime : R ⧸ I ⊓ J →+* (R ⧸ I) × R ⧸ J) =
Ideal.Quotient.factor (I ⊓ J) I inf_le_left := by
apply Quotient.ringHom_ext; ext; rfl
#align ideal.fst_comp_quotient_inf_equiv_quotient_prod Ideal.fst_comp_quotientInfEquivQuotientProd
@[simp]
theorem snd_comp_quotientInfEquivQuotientProd (I J : Ideal R) (coprime : IsCoprime I J) :
(RingHom.snd _ _).comp
(quotientInfEquivQuotientProd I J coprime : R ⧸ I ⊓ J →+* (R ⧸ I) × R ⧸ J) =
Ideal.Quotient.factor (I ⊓ J) J inf_le_right := by
apply Quotient.ringHom_ext; ext; rfl
#align ideal.snd_comp_quotient_inf_equiv_quotient_prod Ideal.snd_comp_quotientInfEquivQuotientProd
/-- **Chinese remainder theorem**, specialized to two ideals. -/
noncomputable def quotientMulEquivQuotientProd (I J : Ideal R) (coprime : IsCoprime I J) :
R ⧸ I * J ≃+* (R ⧸ I) × R ⧸ J :=
Ideal.quotEquivOfEq (inf_eq_mul_of_isCoprime coprime).symm |>.trans <|
Ideal.quotientInfEquivQuotientProd I J coprime
#align ideal.quotient_mul_equiv_quotient_prod Ideal.quotientMulEquivQuotientProd
@[simp]
theorem quotientMulEquivQuotientProd_fst (I J : Ideal R) (coprime : IsCoprime I J) (x : R ⧸ I * J) :
(quotientMulEquivQuotientProd I J coprime x).fst =
Ideal.Quotient.factor (I * J) I mul_le_right x :=
Quot.inductionOn x fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem quotientMulEquivQuotientProd_snd (I J : Ideal R) (coprime : IsCoprime I J) (x : R ⧸ I * J) :
(quotientMulEquivQuotientProd I J coprime x).snd =
Ideal.Quotient.factor (I * J) J mul_le_left x :=
Quot.inductionOn x fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_comp_quotientMulEquivQuotientProd (I J : Ideal R) (coprime : IsCoprime I J) :
(RingHom.fst _ _).comp
(quotientMulEquivQuotientProd I J coprime : R ⧸ I * J →+* (R ⧸ I) × R ⧸ J) =
Ideal.Quotient.factor (I * J) I mul_le_right := by
apply Quotient.ringHom_ext; ext; rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_comp_quotientMulEquivQuotientProd (I J : Ideal R) (coprime : IsCoprime I J) :
(RingHom.snd _ _).comp
(quotientMulEquivQuotientProd I J coprime : R ⧸ I * J →+* (R ⧸ I) × R ⧸ J) =
Ideal.Quotient.factor (I * J) J mul_le_left := by
apply Quotient.ringHom_ext; ext; rfl
end ChineseRemainder
section QuotientAlgebra
variable (R₁ R₂ : Type*) {A B : Type*}
variable [CommSemiring R₁] [CommSemiring R₂] [CommRing A]
variable [Algebra R₁ A] [Algebra R₂ A]
/-- The `R₁`-algebra structure on `A/I` for an `R₁`-algebra `A` -/
instance Quotient.algebra {I : Ideal A} : Algebra R₁ (A ⧸ I) :=
{ toRingHom := (Ideal.Quotient.mk I).comp (algebraMap R₁ A)
smul_def' := fun _ x =>
Quotient.inductionOn' x fun _ =>
((Quotient.mk I).congr_arg <| Algebra.smul_def _ _).trans (RingHom.map_mul _ _ _)
commutes' := fun _ _ => mul_comm _ _ }
#align ideal.quotient.algebra Ideal.Quotient.algebra
-- Lean can struggle to find this instance later if we don't provide this shortcut
-- Porting note: this can probably now be deleted
-- update: maybe not - removal causes timeouts
instance Quotient.isScalarTower [SMul R₁ R₂] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ A] (I : Ideal A) :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (A ⧸ I) := by infer_instance
#align ideal.quotient.is_scalar_tower Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower
/-- The canonical morphism `A →ₐ[R₁] A ⧸ I` as morphism of `R₁`-algebras, for `I` an ideal of
`A`, where `A` is an `R₁`-algebra. -/
def Quotient.mkₐ (I : Ideal A) : A →ₐ[R₁] A ⧸ I :=
⟨⟨⟨⟨fun a => Submodule.Quotient.mk a, rfl⟩, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align ideal.quotient.mkₐ Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ
theorem Quotient.algHom_ext {I : Ideal A} {S} [Semiring S] [Algebra R₁ S] ⦃f g : A ⧸ I →ₐ[R₁] S⦄
(h : f.comp (Quotient.mkₐ R₁ I) = g.comp (Quotient.mkₐ R₁ I)) : f = g :=
AlgHom.ext fun x => Quotient.inductionOn' x <| AlgHom.congr_fun h
#align ideal.quotient.alg_hom_ext Ideal.Quotient.algHom_ext
theorem Quotient.alg_map_eq (I : Ideal A) :
algebraMap R₁ (A ⧸ I) = (algebraMap A (A ⧸ I)).comp (algebraMap R₁ A) :=
rfl
#align ideal.quotient.alg_map_eq Ideal.Quotient.alg_map_eq
theorem Quotient.mkₐ_toRingHom (I : Ideal A) :
(Quotient.mkₐ R₁ I).toRingHom = Ideal.Quotient.mk I :=
rfl
#align ideal.quotient.mkₐ_to_ring_hom Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ_toRingHom
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk (I : Ideal A) : ⇑(Quotient.mkₐ R₁ I) = Quotient.mk I :=
rfl
#align ideal.quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.algebraMap_eq (I : Ideal R) : algebraMap R (R ⧸ I) = Quotient.mk I :=
rfl
#align ideal.quotient.algebra_map_eq Ideal.Quotient.algebraMap_eq
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.mk_comp_algebraMap (I : Ideal A) :
(Quotient.mk I).comp (algebraMap R₁ A) = algebraMap R₁ (A ⧸ I) :=
rfl
#align ideal.quotient.mk_comp_algebra_map Ideal.Quotient.mk_comp_algebraMap
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.mk_algebraMap (I : Ideal A) (x : R₁) :
Quotient.mk I (algebraMap R₁ A x) = algebraMap R₁ (A ⧸ I) x :=
rfl
#align ideal.quotient.mk_algebra_map Ideal.Quotient.mk_algebraMap
/-- The canonical morphism `A →ₐ[R₁] I.quotient` is surjective. -/
theorem Quotient.mkₐ_surjective (I : Ideal A) : Function.Surjective (Quotient.mkₐ R₁ I) :=
surjective_quot_mk _
#align ideal.quotient.mkₐ_surjective Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ_surjective
/-- The kernel of `A →ₐ[R₁] I.quotient` is `I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.mkₐ_ker (I : Ideal A) : RingHom.ker (Quotient.mkₐ R₁ I : A →+* A ⧸ I) = I :=
Ideal.mk_ker
#align ideal.quotient.mkₐ_ker Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ_ker
variable {R₁}
section
variable [Semiring B] [Algebra R₁ B]
/-- `Ideal.quotient.lift` as an `AlgHom`. -/
def Quotient.liftₐ (I : Ideal A) (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (hI : ∀ a : A, a ∈ I → f a = 0) :
A ⧸ I →ₐ[R₁] B :=
{-- this is IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R₁ A (A ⧸ I) but the file `Algebra.Algebra.Tower`
-- imports this file.
Ideal.Quotient.lift
I (f : A →+* B) hI with
commutes' := fun r => by
have : algebraMap R₁ (A ⧸ I) r = algebraMap A (A ⧸ I) (algebraMap R₁ A r) := by
simp_rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, one_smul]
rw [this, Ideal.Quotient.algebraMap_eq, RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk,
AlgHom.coe_toRingHom, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one,
map_smul, map_one] }
#align ideal.quotient.liftₐ Ideal.Quotient.liftₐ
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.liftₐ_apply (I : Ideal A) (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (hI : ∀ a : A, a ∈ I → f a = 0) (x) :
Ideal.Quotient.liftₐ I f hI x = Ideal.Quotient.lift I (f : A →+* B) hI x :=
rfl
#align ideal.quotient.liftₐ_apply Ideal.Quotient.liftₐ_apply
theorem Quotient.liftₐ_comp (I : Ideal A) (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (hI : ∀ a : A, a ∈ I → f a = 0) :
(Ideal.Quotient.liftₐ I f hI).comp (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R₁ I) = f :=
AlgHom.ext fun _ => (Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk I (f : A →+* B) hI : _)
#align ideal.quotient.liftₐ_comp Ideal.Quotient.liftₐ_comp
theorem KerLift.map_smul (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (r : R₁) (x : A ⧸ (RingHom.ker f)) :
f.kerLift (r • x) = r • f.kerLift x := by
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := Quotient.mkₐ_surjective R₁ _ x
exact f.map_smul _ _
#align ideal.ker_lift.map_smul Ideal.KerLift.map_smul
/-- The induced algebras morphism from the quotient by the kernel to the codomain.
This is an isomorphism if `f` has a right inverse (`quotientKerAlgEquivOfRightInverse`) /
is surjective (`quotientKerAlgEquivOfSurjective`).
-/
def kerLiftAlg (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) : A ⧸ (RingHom.ker f) →ₐ[R₁] B :=
AlgHom.mk' (RingHom.kerLift (f : A →+* B)) fun _ _ => KerLift.map_smul f _ _
#align ideal.ker_lift_alg Ideal.kerLiftAlg
@[simp]
theorem kerLiftAlg_mk (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (a : A) :
kerLiftAlg f (Quotient.mk (RingHom.ker f) a) = f a := by
rfl
#align ideal.ker_lift_alg_mk Ideal.kerLiftAlg_mk
@[simp]
theorem kerLiftAlg_toRingHom (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) :
(kerLiftAlg f : A ⧸ ker f →+* B) = RingHom.kerLift (f : A →+* B) :=
rfl
#align ideal.ker_lift_alg_to_ring_hom Ideal.kerLiftAlg_toRingHom
/-- The induced algebra morphism from the quotient by the kernel is injective. -/
theorem kerLiftAlg_injective (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) : Function.Injective (kerLiftAlg f) :=
RingHom.kerLift_injective (R := A) (S := B) f
#align ideal.ker_lift_alg_injective Ideal.kerLiftAlg_injective
/-- The **first isomorphism** theorem for algebras, computable version. -/
@[simps!]
def quotientKerAlgEquivOfRightInverse {f : A →ₐ[R₁] B} {g : B → A}
(hf : Function.RightInverse g f) : (A ⧸ RingHom.ker f) ≃ₐ[R₁] B :=
{ RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse hf,
kerLiftAlg f with }
#align ideal.quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse Ideal.quotientKerAlgEquivOfRightInverse
#align ideal.quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse.apply Ideal.quotientKerAlgEquivOfRightInverse_apply
#align ideal.quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse_symm.apply Ideal.quotientKerAlgEquivOfRightInverse_symm_apply
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-27")]
alias quotientKerAlgEquivOfRightInverse.apply := quotientKerAlgEquivOfRightInverse_apply
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-27")]
alias QuotientKerAlgEquivOfRightInverseSymm.apply := quotientKerAlgEquivOfRightInverse_symm_apply
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for algebras. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def quotientKerAlgEquivOfSurjective {f : A →ₐ[R₁] B} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(A ⧸ (RingHom.ker f)) ≃ₐ[R₁] B :=
quotientKerAlgEquivOfRightInverse (Classical.choose_spec hf.hasRightInverse)
#align ideal.quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_surjective Ideal.quotientKerAlgEquivOfSurjective
end
section CommRing_CommRing
variable {S : Type v} [CommRing S]
/-- The ring hom `R/I →+* S/J` induced by a ring hom `f : R →+* S` with `I ≤ f⁻¹(J)` -/
def quotientMap {I : Ideal R} (J : Ideal S) (f : R →+* S) (hIJ : I ≤ J.comap f) : R ⧸ I →+* S ⧸ J :=
Quotient.lift I ((Quotient.mk J).comp f) fun _ ha => by
simpa [Function.comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp, Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem] using hIJ ha
#align ideal.quotient_map Ideal.quotientMap
@[simp]
theorem quotientMap_mk {J : Ideal R} {I : Ideal S} {f : R →+* S} {H : J ≤ I.comap f} {x : R} :
quotientMap I f H (Quotient.mk J x) = Quotient.mk I (f x) :=
Quotient.lift_mk J _ _
#align ideal.quotient_map_mk Ideal.quotientMap_mk
@[simp]
theorem quotientMap_algebraMap {J : Ideal A} {I : Ideal S} {f : A →+* S} {H : J ≤ I.comap f}
{x : R₁} : quotientMap I f H (algebraMap R₁ (A ⧸ J) x) = Quotient.mk I (f (algebraMap _ _ x)) :=
Quotient.lift_mk J _ _
#align ideal.quotient_map_algebra_map Ideal.quotientMap_algebraMap
theorem quotientMap_comp_mk {J : Ideal R} {I : Ideal S} {f : R →+* S} (H : J ≤ I.comap f) :
(quotientMap I f H).comp (Quotient.mk J) = (Quotient.mk I).comp f :=
RingHom.ext fun x => by simp only [Function.comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp, Ideal.quotientMap_mk]
#align ideal.quotient_map_comp_mk Ideal.quotientMap_comp_mk
/-- The ring equiv `R/I ≃+* S/J` induced by a ring equiv `f : R ≃+** S`, where `J = f(I)`. -/
@[simps]
def quotientEquiv (I : Ideal R) (J : Ideal S) (f : R ≃+* S) (hIJ : J = I.map (f : R →+* S)) :
R ⧸ I ≃+* S ⧸ J :=
{
quotientMap J (↑f) (by
rw [hIJ]
exact le_comap_map)
with
invFun :=
quotientMap I (↑f.symm)
(by
rw [hIJ]
exact le_of_eq (map_comap_of_equiv I f))
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨r⟩
simp only [Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk, Quotient.mk_eq_mk, RingHom.toFun_eq_coe,
quotientMap_mk, RingEquiv.coe_toRingHom, RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨s⟩
simp only [Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk, Quotient.mk_eq_mk, RingHom.toFun_eq_coe,
quotientMap_mk, RingEquiv.coe_toRingHom, RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply] }
#align ideal.quotient_equiv Ideal.quotientEquiv
/- Porting note: removed simp. LHS simplified. Slightly different version of the simplified
form closed this and was itself closed by simp -/
theorem quotientEquiv_mk (I : Ideal R) (J : Ideal S) (f : R ≃+* S) (hIJ : J = I.map (f : R →+* S))
(x : R) : quotientEquiv I J f hIJ (Ideal.Quotient.mk I x) = Ideal.Quotient.mk J (f x) :=
rfl
#align ideal.quotient_equiv_mk Ideal.quotientEquiv_mk
@[simp]
theorem quotientEquiv_symm_mk (I : Ideal R) (J : Ideal S) (f : R ≃+* S)
(hIJ : J = I.map (f : R →+* S)) (x : S) :
(quotientEquiv I J f hIJ).symm (Ideal.Quotient.mk J x) = Ideal.Quotient.mk I (f.symm x) :=
rfl
#align ideal.quotient_equiv_symm_mk Ideal.quotientEquiv_symm_mk
/-- `H` and `h` are kept as separate hypothesis since H is used in constructing the quotient map. -/
theorem quotientMap_injective' {J : Ideal R} {I : Ideal S} {f : R →+* S} {H : J ≤ I.comap f}
(h : I.comap f ≤ J) : Function.Injective (quotientMap I f H) := by
refine (injective_iff_map_eq_zero (quotientMap I f H)).2 fun a ha => ?_
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := Quotient.mk_surjective a
rw [quotientMap_mk, Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem] at ha
exact Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.mpr (h ha)
#align ideal.quotient_map_injective' Ideal.quotientMap_injective'
/-- If we take `J = I.comap f` then `QuotientMap` is injective automatically. -/
theorem quotientMap_injective {I : Ideal S} {f : R →+* S} :
Function.Injective (quotientMap I f le_rfl) :=
quotientMap_injective' le_rfl
#align ideal.quotient_map_injective Ideal.quotientMap_injective
theorem quotientMap_surjective {J : Ideal R} {I : Ideal S} {f : R →+* S} {H : J ≤ I.comap f}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : Function.Surjective (quotientMap I f H) := fun x =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := Quotient.mk_surjective x
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf x
⟨(Quotient.mk J) y, by simp [hx, hy]⟩
#align ideal.quotient_map_surjective Ideal.quotientMap_surjective
/-- Commutativity of a square is preserved when taking quotients by an ideal. -/
theorem comp_quotientMap_eq_of_comp_eq {R' S' : Type*} [CommRing R'] [CommRing S'] {f : R →+* S}
{f' : R' →+* S'} {g : R →+* R'} {g' : S →+* S'} (hfg : f'.comp g = g'.comp f) (I : Ideal S') :
-- Porting note: was losing track of I
let leq := le_of_eq (_root_.trans (comap_comap (I := I) f g') (hfg ▸ comap_comap (I := I) g f'))
(quotientMap I g' le_rfl).comp (quotientMap (I.comap g') f le_rfl) =
(quotientMap I f' le_rfl).comp (quotientMap (I.comap f') g leq) := by
refine RingHom.ext fun a => ?_
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := Quotient.mk_surjective a
simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, quotientMap_mk]
exact (Ideal.Quotient.mk I).congr_arg (_root_.trans (g'.comp_apply f r).symm
(hfg ▸ f'.comp_apply g r))
#align ideal.comp_quotient_map_eq_of_comp_eq Ideal.comp_quotientMap_eq_of_comp_eq
end CommRing_CommRing
section
variable [CommRing B] [Algebra R₁ B]
/-- The algebra hom `A/I →+* B/J` induced by an algebra hom `f : A →ₐ[R₁] B` with `I ≤ f⁻¹(J)`. -/
def quotientMapₐ {I : Ideal A} (J : Ideal B) (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (hIJ : I ≤ J.comap f) :
A ⧸ I →ₐ[R₁] B ⧸ J :=
{ quotientMap J (f : A →+* B) hIJ with commutes' := fun r => by simp only [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe,
quotientMap_algebraMap, AlgHom.coe_toRingHom, AlgHom.commutes, Quotient.mk_algebraMap] }
#align ideal.quotient_mapₐ Ideal.quotientMapₐ
@[simp]
theorem quotient_map_mkₐ {I : Ideal A} (J : Ideal B) (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (H : I ≤ J.comap f) {x : A} :
quotientMapₐ J f H (Quotient.mk I x) = Quotient.mkₐ R₁ J (f x) :=
rfl
#align ideal.quotient_map_mkₐ Ideal.quotient_map_mkₐ
theorem quotient_map_comp_mkₐ {I : Ideal A} (J : Ideal B) (f : A →ₐ[R₁] B) (H : I ≤ J.comap f) :
(quotientMapₐ J f H).comp (Quotient.mkₐ R₁ I) = (Quotient.mkₐ R₁ J).comp f :=
AlgHom.ext fun x => by simp only [quotient_map_mkₐ, Quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk, AlgHom.comp_apply]
#align ideal.quotient_map_comp_mkₐ Ideal.quotient_map_comp_mkₐ
/-- The algebra equiv `A/I ≃ₐ[R] B/J` induced by an algebra equiv `f : A ≃ₐ[R] B`,
where`J = f(I)`. -/
def quotientEquivAlg (I : Ideal A) (J : Ideal B) (f : A ≃ₐ[R₁] B) (hIJ : J = I.map (f : A →+* B)) :
(A ⧸ I) ≃ₐ[R₁] B ⧸ J :=
{ quotientEquiv I J (f : A ≃+* B) hIJ with
commutes' := fun r => by
-- Porting note: Needed to add the below lemma because Equivs coerce weird
have : ∀ (e : RingEquiv (A ⧸ I) (B ⧸ J)), Equiv.toFun e.toEquiv = DFunLike.coe e :=
fun _ ↦ rfl
rw [this]
simp only [quotientEquiv_apply, RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, quotientMap_algebraMap,
RingEquiv.coe_toRingHom, AlgEquiv.coe_ringEquiv, AlgEquiv.commutes, Quotient.mk_algebraMap]}
#align ideal.quotient_equiv_alg Ideal.quotientEquivAlg
end
instance (priority := 100) quotientAlgebra {I : Ideal A} [Algebra R A] :
Algebra (R ⧸ I.comap (algebraMap R A)) (A ⧸ I) :=
(quotientMap I (algebraMap R A) (le_of_eq rfl)).toAlgebra
#align ideal.quotient_algebra Ideal.quotientAlgebra
theorem algebraMap_quotient_injective {I : Ideal A} [Algebra R A] :
Function.Injective (algebraMap (R ⧸ I.comap (algebraMap R A)) (A ⧸ I)) := by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ hab
replace hab := Quotient.eq.mp hab
rw [← RingHom.map_sub] at hab
exact Quotient.eq.mpr hab
#align ideal.algebra_map_quotient_injective Ideal.algebraMap_quotient_injective
variable (R₁)
/-- Quotienting by equal ideals gives equivalent algebras. -/
def quotientEquivAlgOfEq {I J : Ideal A} (h : I = J) : (A ⧸ I) ≃ₐ[R₁] A ⧸ J :=
quotientEquivAlg I J AlgEquiv.refl <| h ▸ (map_id I).symm
#align ideal.quotient_equiv_alg_of_eq Ideal.quotientEquivAlgOfEq
@[simp]
theorem quotientEquivAlgOfEq_mk {I J : Ideal A} (h : I = J) (x : A) :
quotientEquivAlgOfEq R₁ h (Ideal.Quotient.mk I x) = Ideal.Quotient.mk J x :=
rfl
#align ideal.quotient_equiv_alg_of_eq_mk Ideal.quotientEquivAlgOfEq_mk
@[simp]
theorem quotientEquivAlgOfEq_symm {I J : Ideal A} (h : I = J) :
(quotientEquivAlgOfEq R₁ h).symm = quotientEquivAlgOfEq R₁ h.symm := by
ext
rfl
#align ideal.quotient_equiv_alg_of_eq_symm Ideal.quotientEquivAlgOfEq_symm
lemma comap_map_mk {I J : Ideal R} (h : I ≤ J) :
Ideal.comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) (Ideal.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) J) = J := by
ext; rw [← Ideal.mem_quotient_iff_mem h, Ideal.mem_comap]
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative algebras (`AlgHom.range` version). -/
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivRange
{A B : Type*} [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
(f : A →ₐ[R] B) :
(A ⧸ RingHom.ker f) ≃ₐ[R] f.range :=
(Ideal.quotientEquivAlgOfEq R (AlgHom.ker_rangeRestrict f).symm).trans <|
Ideal.quotientKerAlgEquivOfSurjective f.rangeRestrict_surjective
end QuotientAlgebra
end Ideal
namespace DoubleQuot
open Ideal
variable {R : Type u}
section
variable [CommRing R] (I J : Ideal R)
/-- The obvious ring hom `R/I → R/(I ⊔ J)` -/
def quotLeftToQuotSup : R ⧸ I →+* R ⧸ I ⊔ J :=
Ideal.Quotient.factor I (I ⊔ J) le_sup_left
#align double_quot.quot_left_to_quot_sup DoubleQuot.quotLeftToQuotSup
/-- The kernel of `quotLeftToQuotSup` -/
theorem ker_quotLeftToQuotSup : RingHom.ker (quotLeftToQuotSup I J) =
J.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) := by
simp only [mk_ker, sup_idem, sup_comm, quotLeftToQuotSup, Quotient.factor, ker_quotient_lift,
map_eq_iff_sup_ker_eq_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) Quotient.mk_surjective, ← sup_assoc]
#align double_quot.ker_quot_left_to_quot_sup DoubleQuot.ker_quotLeftToQuotSup
/-- The ring homomorphism `(R/I)/J' -> R/(I ⊔ J)` induced by `quotLeftToQuotSup` where `J'`
is the image of `J` in `R/I`-/
def quotQuotToQuotSup : (R ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) →+* R ⧸ I ⊔ J :=
Ideal.Quotient.lift (J.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)) (quotLeftToQuotSup I J)
(ker_quotLeftToQuotSup I J).symm.le
#align double_quot.quot_quot_to_quot_sup DoubleQuot.quotQuotToQuotSup
/-- The composite of the maps `R → (R/I)` and `(R/I) → (R/I)/J'` -/
def quotQuotMk : R →+* (R ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) :=
(Ideal.Quotient.mk (J.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I))).comp (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)
#align double_quot.quot_quot_mk DoubleQuot.quotQuotMk
-- Porting note: mismatched instances
/-- The kernel of `quotQuotMk` -/
theorem ker_quotQuotMk : RingHom.ker (quotQuotMk I J) = I ⊔ J := by
rw [RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot, quotQuotMk, ← comap_comap, ← RingHom.ker, mk_ker,
comap_map_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) Quotient.mk_surjective, ← RingHom.ker, mk_ker,
sup_comm]
#align double_quot.ker_quot_quot_mk DoubleQuot.ker_quotQuotMk
/-- The ring homomorphism `R/(I ⊔ J) → (R/I)/J' `induced by `quotQuotMk` -/
def liftSupQuotQuotMk (I J : Ideal R) : R ⧸ I ⊔ J →+* (R ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) :=
Ideal.Quotient.lift (I ⊔ J) (quotQuotMk I J) (ker_quotQuotMk I J).symm.le
#align double_quot.lift_sup_quot_quot_mk DoubleQuot.liftSupQuotQuotMk
/-- `quotQuotToQuotSup` and `liftSupQuotQuotMk` are inverse isomorphisms. In the case where
`I ≤ J`, this is the Third Isomorphism Theorem (see `quotQuotEquivQuotOfLe`)-/
def quotQuotEquivQuotSup : (R ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) ≃+* R ⧸ I ⊔ J :=
RingEquiv.ofHomInv (quotQuotToQuotSup I J) (liftSupQuotQuotMk I J)
(by
repeat apply Ideal.Quotient.ringHom_ext
rfl)
(by
repeat apply Ideal.Quotient.ringHom_ext
rfl)
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotSup
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotEquivQuotSup_quotQuotMk (x : R) :
quotQuotEquivQuotSup I J (quotQuotMk I J x) = Ideal.Quotient.mk (I ⊔ J) x :=
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup_quot_quot_mk DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotSup_quotQuotMk
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotEquivQuotSup_symm_quotQuotMk (x : R) :
(quotQuotEquivQuotSup I J).symm (Ideal.Quotient.mk (I ⊔ J) x) = quotQuotMk I J x :=
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup_symm_quot_quot_mk DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotSup_symm_quotQuotMk
/-- The obvious isomorphism `(R/I)/J' → (R/J)/I'` -/
def quotQuotEquivComm : (R ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) ≃+*
(R ⧸ J) ⧸ I.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) :=
((quotQuotEquivQuotSup I J).trans (quotEquivOfEq (sup_comm ..))).trans
(quotQuotEquivQuotSup J I).symm
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_comm DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivComm
-- Porting note: mismatched instances
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotEquivComm_quotQuotMk (x : R) :
quotQuotEquivComm I J (quotQuotMk I J x) = quotQuotMk J I x :=
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_comm_quot_quot_mk DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivComm_quotQuotMk
-- Porting note: mismatched instances
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotEquivComm_comp_quotQuotMk :
RingHom.comp (↑(quotQuotEquivComm I J)) (quotQuotMk I J) = quotQuotMk J I :=
RingHom.ext <| quotQuotEquivComm_quotQuotMk I J
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_comm_comp_quot_quot_mk DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivComm_comp_quotQuotMk
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotEquivComm_symm : (quotQuotEquivComm I J).symm = quotQuotEquivComm J I := by
/- Porting note: this proof used to just be rfl but currently rfl opens up a bottomless pit
of processor cycles. Synthesizing instances does not seem to be an issue.
-/
change (((quotQuotEquivQuotSup I J).trans (quotEquivOfEq (sup_comm ..))).trans
(quotQuotEquivQuotSup J I).symm).symm =
((quotQuotEquivQuotSup J I).trans (quotEquivOfEq (sup_comm ..))).trans
(quotQuotEquivQuotSup I J).symm
ext r
dsimp
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_comm_symm DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivComm_symm
variable {I J}
/-- **The Third Isomorphism theorem** for rings. See `quotQuotEquivQuotSup` for a version
that does not assume an inclusion of ideals. -/
def quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE (h : I ≤ J) : (R ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) ≃+* R ⧸ J :=
(quotQuotEquivQuotSup I J).trans (Ideal.quotEquivOfEq <| sup_eq_right.mpr h)
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_quot_of_le DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE_quotQuotMk (x : R) (h : I ≤ J) :
quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE h (quotQuotMk I J x) = (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) x :=
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_quot_of_le_quot_quot_mk DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE_quotQuotMk
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE_symm_mk (x : R) (h : I ≤ J) :
(quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE h).symm ((Ideal.Quotient.mk J) x) = quotQuotMk I J x :=
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_quot_of_le_symm_mk DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE_symm_mk
theorem quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE_comp_quotQuotMk (h : I ≤ J) :
RingHom.comp (↑(quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE h)) (quotQuotMk I J) = (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) := by
ext
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_quot_of_le_comp_quot_quot_mk DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE_comp_quotQuotMk
theorem quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE_symm_comp_mk (h : I ≤ J) :
RingHom.comp (↑(quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE h).symm) (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) = quotQuotMk I J := by
ext
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_quot_of_le_symm_comp_mk DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE_symm_comp_mk
end
section Algebra
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotEquivComm_mk_mk [CommRing R] (I J : Ideal R) (x : R) :
quotQuotEquivComm I J (Ideal.Quotient.mk _ (Ideal.Quotient.mk _ x)) = algebraMap R _ x :=
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_comm_mk_mk DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivComm_mk_mk
variable [CommSemiring R] {A : Type v} [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] (I J : Ideal A)
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotEquivQuotSup_quot_quot_algebraMap (x : R) :
DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotSup I J (algebraMap R _ x) = algebraMap _ _ x :=
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup_quot_quot_algebra_map DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotSup_quot_quot_algebraMap
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotEquivComm_algebraMap (x : R) :
quotQuotEquivComm I J (algebraMap R _ x) = algebraMap _ _ x :=
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_comm_algebra_map DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivComm_algebraMap
end Algebra
section AlgebraQuotient
variable (R) {A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] (I J : Ideal A)
/-- The natural algebra homomorphism `A / I → A / (I ⊔ J)`. -/
def quotLeftToQuotSupₐ : A ⧸ I →ₐ[R] A ⧸ I ⊔ J :=
AlgHom.mk (quotLeftToQuotSup I J) fun _ => rfl
#align double_quot.quot_left_to_quot_supₐ DoubleQuot.quotLeftToQuotSupₐ
@[simp]
theorem quotLeftToQuotSupₐ_toRingHom :
(quotLeftToQuotSupₐ R I J : _ →+* _) = quotLeftToQuotSup I J :=
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_left_to_quot_supₐ_to_ring_hom DoubleQuot.quotLeftToQuotSupₐ_toRingHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_quotLeftToQuotSupₐ : ⇑(quotLeftToQuotSupₐ R I J) = quotLeftToQuotSup I J :=
rfl
#align double_quot.coe_quot_left_to_quot_supₐ DoubleQuot.coe_quotLeftToQuotSupₐ
/-- The algebra homomorphism `(A / I) / J' -> A / (I ⊔ J)` induced by `quotQuotToQuotSup`,
where `J'` is the projection of `J` in `A / I`. -/
def quotQuotToQuotSupₐ : (A ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map (Quotient.mkₐ R I) →ₐ[R] A ⧸ I ⊔ J :=
AlgHom.mk (quotQuotToQuotSup I J) fun _ => rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_to_quot_supₐ DoubleQuot.quotQuotToQuotSupₐ
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotToQuotSupₐ_toRingHom :
((quotQuotToQuotSupₐ R I J) : _ ⧸ map (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R I) J →+* _) =
quotQuotToQuotSup I J :=
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_to_quot_supₐ_to_ring_hom DoubleQuot.quotQuotToQuotSupₐ_toRingHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_quotQuotToQuotSupₐ : ⇑(quotQuotToQuotSupₐ R I J) = quotQuotToQuotSup I J :=
rfl
#align double_quot.coe_quot_quot_to_quot_supₐ DoubleQuot.coe_quotQuotToQuotSupₐ
/-- The composition of the algebra homomorphisms `A → (A / I)` and `(A / I) → (A / I) / J'`,
where `J'` is the projection `J` in `A / I`. -/
def quotQuotMkₐ : A →ₐ[R] (A ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map (Quotient.mkₐ R I) :=
AlgHom.mk (quotQuotMk I J) fun _ => rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_mkₐ DoubleQuot.quotQuotMkₐ
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotMkₐ_toRingHom :
(quotQuotMkₐ R I J : _ →+* _ ⧸ J.map (Quotient.mkₐ R I)) = quotQuotMk I J :=
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_mkₐ_to_ring_hom DoubleQuot.quotQuotMkₐ_toRingHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_quotQuotMkₐ : ⇑(quotQuotMkₐ R I J) = quotQuotMk I J :=
rfl
#align double_quot.coe_quot_quot_mkₐ DoubleQuot.coe_quotQuotMkₐ
/-- The injective algebra homomorphism `A / (I ⊔ J) → (A / I) / J'`induced by `quot_quot_mk`,
where `J'` is the projection `J` in `A / I`. -/
def liftSupQuotQuotMkₐ (I J : Ideal A) : A ⧸ I ⊔ J →ₐ[R] (A ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map (Quotient.mkₐ R I) :=
AlgHom.mk (liftSupQuotQuotMk I J) fun _ => rfl
#align double_quot.lift_sup_quot_quot_mkₐ DoubleQuot.liftSupQuotQuotMkₐ
@[simp]
theorem liftSupQuotQuotMkₐ_toRingHom :
(liftSupQuotQuotMkₐ R I J : _ →+* _ ⧸ J.map (Quotient.mkₐ R I)) = liftSupQuotQuotMk I J :=
rfl
#align double_quot.lift_sup_quot_quot_mkₐ_to_ring_hom DoubleQuot.liftSupQuotQuotMkₐ_toRingHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_liftSupQuotQuotMkₐ : ⇑(liftSupQuotQuotMkₐ R I J) = liftSupQuotQuotMk I J :=
rfl
#align double_quot.coe_lift_sup_quot_quot_mkₐ DoubleQuot.coe_liftSupQuotQuotMkₐ
/-- `quotQuotToQuotSup` and `liftSupQuotQuotMk` are inverse isomorphisms. In the case where
`I ≤ J`, this is the Third Isomorphism Theorem (see `DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotOfLE`). -/
def quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ : ((A ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map (Quotient.mkₐ R I)) ≃ₐ[R] A ⧸ I ⊔ J :=
AlgEquiv.ofRingEquiv (f := quotQuotEquivQuotSup I J) fun _ => rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_quot_supₐ DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ_toRingEquiv :
(quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ R I J : _ ⧸ J.map (Quotient.mkₐ R I) ≃+* _) = quotQuotEquivQuotSup I J :=
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_quot_supₐ_to_ring_equiv DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ_toRingEquiv
@[simp]
-- Porting note: had to add an extra coercion arrow on the right hand side.
theorem coe_quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ : ⇑(quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ R I J) = ⇑(quotQuotEquivQuotSup I J) :=
rfl
#align double_quot.coe_quot_quot_equiv_quot_supₐ DoubleQuot.coe_quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ_symm_toRingEquiv :
((quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ R I J).symm : _ ≃+* _ ⧸ J.map (Quotient.mkₐ R I)) =
(quotQuotEquivQuotSup I J).symm :=
rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_quot_supₐ_symm_to_ring_equiv DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ_symm_toRingEquiv
@[simp]
-- Porting note: had to add an extra coercion arrow on the right hand side.
theorem coe_quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ_symm :
⇑(quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ R I J).symm = ⇑(quotQuotEquivQuotSup I J).symm :=
rfl
#align double_quot.coe_quot_quot_equiv_quot_supₐ_symm DoubleQuot.coe_quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ_symm
/-- The natural algebra isomorphism `(A / I) / J' → (A / J) / I'`,
where `J'` (resp. `I'`) is the projection of `J` in `A / I` (resp. `I` in `A / J`). -/
def quotQuotEquivCommₐ :
((A ⧸ I) ⧸ J.map (Quotient.mkₐ R I)) ≃ₐ[R] (A ⧸ J) ⧸ I.map (Quotient.mkₐ R J) :=
AlgEquiv.ofRingEquiv (f := quotQuotEquivComm I J) fun _ => rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_commₐ DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivCommₐ
@[simp]
theorem quotQuotEquivCommₐ_toRingEquiv :
(quotQuotEquivCommₐ R I J : _ ⧸ J.map (Quotient.mkₐ R I) ≃+* _ ⧸ I.map (Quotient.mkₐ R J)) =
quotQuotEquivComm I J :=
-- Porting note: should just be `rfl` but `AlgEquiv.toRingEquiv` and `AlgEquiv.ofRingEquiv`
-- involve repacking everything in the structure, so Lean ends up unfolding `quotQuotEquivComm`
-- and timing out.
RingEquiv.ext fun _ => rfl
#align double_quot.quot_quot_equiv_commₐ_to_ring_equiv DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivCommₐ_toRingEquiv
@[simp]
theorem coe_quotQuotEquivCommₐ : ⇑(quotQuotEquivCommₐ R I J) = ⇑(quotQuotEquivComm I J) :=
rfl
#align double_quot.coe_quot_quot_equiv_commₐ DoubleQuot.coe_quotQuotEquivCommₐ
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/QuotientOperations.lean | 989 | 995 | theorem quotQuotEquivComm_symmₐ : (quotQuotEquivCommₐ R I J).symm = quotQuotEquivCommₐ R J I := by |
-- Porting note: should just be `rfl` but `AlgEquiv.toRingEquiv` and `AlgEquiv.ofRingEquiv`
-- involve repacking everything in the structure, so Lean ends up unfolding `quotQuotEquivComm`
-- and timing out.
ext
unfold quotQuotEquivCommₐ
congr
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Composition
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ChartedSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
#align_import geometry.manifold.smooth_manifold_with_corners from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ddec54a71a0dd025c05445d467f1a2b7d586a3ba"
/-!
# Smooth manifolds (possibly with boundary or corners)
A smooth manifold is a manifold modelled on a normed vector space, or a subset like a
half-space (to get manifolds with boundaries) for which the changes of coordinates are smooth maps.
We define a model with corners as a map `I : H → E` embedding nicely the topological space `H` in
the vector space `E` (or more precisely as a structure containing all the relevant properties).
Given such a model with corners `I` on `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of local
homeomorphisms of `H` which are smooth when read in `E` (for any regularity `n : ℕ∞`).
With this groupoid at hand and the general machinery of charted spaces, we thus get the notion
of `C^n` manifold with respect to any model with corners `I` on `(E, H)`. We also introduce a
specific type class for `C^∞` manifolds as these are the most commonly used.
Some texts assume manifolds to be Hausdorff and secound countable. We (in mathlib) assume neither,
but add these assumptions later as needed. (Quite a few results still do not require them.)
## Main definitions
* `ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H` :
a structure containing informations on the way a space `H` embeds in a
model vector space E over the field `𝕜`. This is all that is needed to
define a smooth manifold with model space `H`, and model vector space `E`.
* `modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E` :
trivial model with corners structure on the space `E` embedded in itself by the identity.
* `contDiffGroupoid n I` :
when `I` is a model with corners on `(𝕜, E, H)`, this is the groupoid of partial homeos of `H`
which are of class `C^n` over the normed field `𝕜`, when read in `E`.
* `SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M` :
a type class saying that the charted space `M`, modelled on the space `H`, has `C^∞` changes of
coordinates with respect to the model with corners `I` on `(𝕜, E, H)`. This type class is just
a shortcut for `HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)`.
* `extChartAt I x`:
in a smooth manifold with corners with the model `I` on `(E, H)`, the charts take values in `H`,
but often we may want to use their `E`-valued version, obtained by composing the charts with `I`.
Since the target is in general not open, we can not register them as partial homeomorphisms, but
we register them as `PartialEquiv`s.
`extChartAt I x` is the canonical such partial equiv around `x`.
As specific examples of models with corners, we define (in `Geometry.Manifold.Instances.Real`)
* `modelWithCornersSelf ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n))` for the model space used to define
`n`-dimensional real manifolds without boundary (with notation `𝓡 n` in the locale `Manifold`)
* `ModelWithCorners ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) (EuclideanHalfSpace n)` for the model space
used to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with boundary (with notation `𝓡∂ n` in the locale
`Manifold`)
* `ModelWithCorners ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) (EuclideanQuadrant n)` for the model space used
to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with corners
With these definitions at hand, to invoke an `n`-dimensional real manifold without boundary,
one could use
`variable {n : ℕ} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) M]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners (𝓡 n) M]`.
However, this is not the recommended way: a theorem proved using this assumption would not apply
for instance to the tangent space of such a manifold, which is modelled on
`(EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) × (EuclideanSpace (Fin n))` and not on `EuclideanSpace (Fin (2 * n))`!
In the same way, it would not apply to product manifolds, modelled on
`(EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) × (EuclideanSpace (Fin m))`.
The right invocation does not focus on one specific construction, but on all constructions sharing
the right properties, like
`variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
{I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E E} [I.Boundaryless]
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace E M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M]`
Here, `I.Boundaryless` is a typeclass property ensuring that there is no boundary (this is for
instance the case for `modelWithCornersSelf`, or products of these). Note that one could consider
as a natural assumption to only use the trivial model with corners `modelWithCornersSelf ℝ E`,
but again in product manifolds the natural model with corners will not be this one but the product
one (and they are not defeq as `(fun p : E × F ↦ (p.1, p.2))` is not defeq to the identity).
So, it is important to use the above incantation to maximize the applicability of theorems.
## Implementation notes
We want to talk about manifolds modelled on a vector space, but also on manifolds with
boundary, modelled on a half space (or even manifolds with corners). For the latter examples,
we still want to define smooth functions, tangent bundles, and so on. As smooth functions are
well defined on vector spaces or subsets of these, one could take for model space a subtype of a
vector space. With the drawback that the whole vector space itself (which is the most basic
example) is not directly a subtype of itself: the inclusion of `univ : Set E` in `Set E` would
show up in the definition, instead of `id`.
A good abstraction covering both cases it to have a vector
space `E` (with basic example the Euclidean space), a model space `H` (with basic example the upper
half space), and an embedding of `H` into `E` (which can be the identity for `H = E`, or
`Subtype.val` for manifolds with corners). We say that the pair `(E, H)` with their embedding is a
model with corners, and we encompass all the relevant properties (in particular the fact that the
image of `H` in `E` should have unique differentials) in the definition of `ModelWithCorners`.
We concentrate on `C^∞` manifolds: all the definitions work equally well for `C^n` manifolds, but
later on it is a pain to carry all over the smoothness parameter, especially when one wants to deal
with `C^k` functions as there would be additional conditions `k ≤ n` everywhere. Since one deals
almost all the time with `C^∞` (or analytic) manifolds, this seems to be a reasonable choice that
one could revisit later if needed. `C^k` manifolds are still available, but they should be called
using `HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid k I)` where `I` is the model with corners.
I have considered using the model with corners `I` as a typeclass argument, possibly `outParam`, to
get lighter notations later on, but it did not turn out right, as on `E × F` there are two natural
model with corners, the trivial (identity) one, and the product one, and they are not defeq and one
needs to indicate to Lean which one we want to use.
This means that when talking on objects on manifolds one will most often need to specify the model
with corners one is using. For instance, the tangent bundle will be `TangentBundle I M` and the
derivative will be `mfderiv I I' f`, instead of the more natural notations `TangentBundle 𝕜 M` and
`mfderiv 𝕜 f` (the field has to be explicit anyway, as some manifolds could be considered both as
real and complex manifolds).
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w u' v' w'
open Set Filter Function
open scoped Manifold Filter Topology
/-- The extended natural number `∞` -/
scoped[Manifold] notation "∞" => (⊤ : ℕ∞)
/-! ### Models with corners. -/
/-- A structure containing informations on the way a space `H` embeds in a
model vector space `E` over the field `𝕜`. This is all what is needed to
define a smooth manifold with model space `H`, and model vector space `E`.
-/
@[ext] -- Porting note(#5171): was nolint has_nonempty_instance
structure ModelWithCorners (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] extends
PartialEquiv H E where
source_eq : source = univ
unique_diff' : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 toPartialEquiv.target
continuous_toFun : Continuous toFun := by continuity
continuous_invFun : Continuous invFun := by continuity
#align model_with_corners ModelWithCorners
attribute [simp, mfld_simps] ModelWithCorners.source_eq
/-- A vector space is a model with corners. -/
def modelWithCornersSelf (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E E where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.refl E
source_eq := rfl
unique_diff' := uniqueDiffOn_univ
continuous_toFun := continuous_id
continuous_invFun := continuous_id
#align model_with_corners_self modelWithCornersSelf
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Manifold] notation "𝓘(" 𝕜 ", " E ")" => modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E
/-- A normed field is a model with corners. -/
scoped[Manifold] notation "𝓘(" 𝕜 ")" => modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 𝕜
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
namespace ModelWithCorners
/-- Coercion of a model with corners to a function. We don't use `e.toFun` because it is actually
`e.toPartialEquiv.toFun`, so `simp` will apply lemmas about `toPartialEquiv`. While we may want to
switch to this behavior later, doing it mid-port will break a lot of proofs. -/
@[coe] def toFun' (e : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E := e.toFun
instance : CoeFun (ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) fun _ => H → E := ⟨toFun'⟩
/-- The inverse to a model with corners, only registered as a `PartialEquiv`. -/
protected def symm : PartialEquiv E H :=
I.toPartialEquiv.symm
#align model_with_corners.symm ModelWithCorners.symm
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E :=
I
#align model_with_corners.simps.apply ModelWithCorners.Simps.apply
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : E → H :=
I.symm
#align model_with_corners.simps.symm_apply ModelWithCorners.Simps.symm_apply
initialize_simps_projections ModelWithCorners (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
-- Register a few lemmas to make sure that `simp` puts expressions in normal form
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toPartialEquiv_coe : (I.toPartialEquiv : H → E) = I :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.to_local_equiv_coe ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_coe (e : PartialEquiv H E) (a b c d) :
((ModelWithCorners.mk e a b c d : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E) = (e : H → E) :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.mk_coe ModelWithCorners.mk_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toPartialEquiv_coe_symm : (I.toPartialEquiv.symm : E → H) = I.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.to_local_equiv_coe_symm ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_symm (e : PartialEquiv H E) (a b c d) :
(ModelWithCorners.mk e a b c d : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H).symm = e.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.mk_symm ModelWithCorners.mk_symm
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous : Continuous I :=
I.continuous_toFun
#align model_with_corners.continuous ModelWithCorners.continuous
protected theorem continuousAt {x} : ContinuousAt I x :=
I.continuous.continuousAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_at ModelWithCorners.continuousAt
protected theorem continuousWithinAt {s x} : ContinuousWithinAt I s x :=
I.continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_within_at ModelWithCorners.continuousWithinAt
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_symm : Continuous I.symm :=
I.continuous_invFun
#align model_with_corners.continuous_symm ModelWithCorners.continuous_symm
theorem continuousAt_symm {x} : ContinuousAt I.symm x :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_at_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousAt_symm
theorem continuousWithinAt_symm {s x} : ContinuousWithinAt I.symm s x :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_within_at_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousWithinAt_symm
theorem continuousOn_symm {s} : ContinuousOn I.symm s :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousOn
#align model_with_corners.continuous_on_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousOn_symm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem target_eq : I.target = range (I : H → E) := by
rw [← image_univ, ← I.source_eq]
exact I.image_source_eq_target.symm
#align model_with_corners.target_eq ModelWithCorners.target_eq
protected theorem unique_diff : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (range I) :=
I.target_eq ▸ I.unique_diff'
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff ModelWithCorners.unique_diff
@[simp, mfld_simps]
protected theorem left_inv (x : H) : I.symm (I x) = x := by refine I.left_inv' ?_; simp
#align model_with_corners.left_inv ModelWithCorners.left_inv
protected theorem leftInverse : LeftInverse I.symm I :=
I.left_inv
#align model_with_corners.left_inverse ModelWithCorners.leftInverse
theorem injective : Injective I :=
I.leftInverse.injective
#align model_with_corners.injective ModelWithCorners.injective
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem symm_comp_self : I.symm ∘ I = id :=
I.leftInverse.comp_eq_id
#align model_with_corners.symm_comp_self ModelWithCorners.symm_comp_self
protected theorem rightInvOn : RightInvOn I.symm I (range I) :=
I.leftInverse.rightInvOn_range
#align model_with_corners.right_inv_on ModelWithCorners.rightInvOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
protected theorem right_inv {x : E} (hx : x ∈ range I) : I (I.symm x) = x :=
I.rightInvOn hx
#align model_with_corners.right_inv ModelWithCorners.right_inv
theorem preimage_image (s : Set H) : I ⁻¹' (I '' s) = s :=
I.injective.preimage_image s
#align model_with_corners.preimage_image ModelWithCorners.preimage_image
protected theorem image_eq (s : Set H) : I '' s = I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I := by
refine (I.toPartialEquiv.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage ?_).trans ?_
· rw [I.source_eq]; exact subset_univ _
· rw [inter_comm, I.target_eq, I.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm]
#align model_with_corners.image_eq ModelWithCorners.image_eq
protected theorem closedEmbedding : ClosedEmbedding I :=
I.leftInverse.closedEmbedding I.continuous_symm I.continuous
#align model_with_corners.closed_embedding ModelWithCorners.closedEmbedding
theorem isClosed_range : IsClosed (range I) :=
I.closedEmbedding.isClosed_range
#align model_with_corners.closed_range ModelWithCorners.isClosed_range
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-17")] alias closed_range := isClosed_range
theorem map_nhds_eq (x : H) : map I (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] I x :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.map_nhds_eq x
#align model_with_corners.map_nhds_eq ModelWithCorners.map_nhds_eq
theorem map_nhdsWithin_eq (s : Set H) (x : H) : map I (𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[I '' s] I x :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.map_nhdsWithin_eq s x
#align model_with_corners.map_nhds_within_eq ModelWithCorners.map_nhdsWithin_eq
theorem image_mem_nhdsWithin {x : H} {s : Set H} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : I '' s ∈ 𝓝[range I] I x :=
I.map_nhds_eq x ▸ image_mem_map hs
#align model_with_corners.image_mem_nhds_within ModelWithCorners.image_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem symm_map_nhdsWithin_image {x : H} {s : Set H} : map I.symm (𝓝[I '' s] I x) = 𝓝[s] x := by
rw [← I.map_nhdsWithin_eq, map_map, I.symm_comp_self, map_id]
#align model_with_corners.symm_map_nhds_within_image ModelWithCorners.symm_map_nhdsWithin_image
theorem symm_map_nhdsWithin_range (x : H) : map I.symm (𝓝[range I] I x) = 𝓝 x := by
rw [← I.map_nhds_eq, map_map, I.symm_comp_self, map_id]
#align model_with_corners.symm_map_nhds_within_range ModelWithCorners.symm_map_nhdsWithin_range
theorem unique_diff_preimage {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) := by
rw [inter_comm]
exact I.unique_diff.inter (hs.preimage I.continuous_invFun)
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_preimage ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_preimage
theorem unique_diff_preimage_source {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {e : PartialHomeomorph H β} :
UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (I.symm ⁻¹' e.source ∩ range I) :=
I.unique_diff_preimage e.open_source
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_preimage_source ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_preimage_source
theorem unique_diff_at_image {x : H} : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (range I) (I x) :=
I.unique_diff _ (mem_range_self _)
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_at_image ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_at_image
theorem symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff {X} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : H → X} {s : Set H}
{x : H} :
ContinuousWithinAt (f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (I x) ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.comp I.continuousWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
simp_rw [preimage_inter, preimage_preimage, I.left_inv, preimage_id', preimage_range,
inter_univ] at this
rwa [Function.comp.assoc, I.symm_comp_self] at this
· rw [← I.left_inv x] at h; exact h.comp I.continuousWithinAt_symm inter_subset_left
#align model_with_corners.symm_continuous_within_at_comp_right_iff ModelWithCorners.symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff
protected theorem locallyCompactSpace [LocallyCompactSpace E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) :
LocallyCompactSpace H := by
have : ∀ x : H, (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s => s ∈ 𝓝 (I x) ∧ IsCompact s)
fun s => I.symm '' (s ∩ range I) := fun x ↦ by
rw [← I.symm_map_nhdsWithin_range]
exact ((compact_basis_nhds (I x)).inf_principal _).map _
refine .of_hasBasis this ?_
rintro x s ⟨-, hsc⟩
exact (hsc.inter_right I.isClosed_range).image I.continuous_symm
#align model_with_corners.locally_compact ModelWithCorners.locallyCompactSpace
open TopologicalSpace
protected theorem secondCountableTopology [SecondCountableTopology E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) :
SecondCountableTopology H :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.secondCountableTopology
#align model_with_corners.second_countable_topology ModelWithCorners.secondCountableTopology
end ModelWithCorners
section
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- In the trivial model with corners, the associated `PartialEquiv` is the identity. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_partialEquiv : 𝓘(𝕜, E).toPartialEquiv = PartialEquiv.refl E :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_local_equiv modelWithCornersSelf_partialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_coe : (𝓘(𝕜, E) : E → E) = id :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_coe modelWithCornersSelf_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm : (𝓘(𝕜, E).symm : E → E) = id :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_coe_symm modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm
end
end
section ModelWithCornersProd
/-- Given two model_with_corners `I` on `(E, H)` and `I'` on `(E', H')`, we define the model with
corners `I.prod I'` on `(E × E', ModelProd H H')`. This appears in particular for the manifold
structure on the tangent bundle to a manifold modelled on `(E, H)`: it will be modelled on
`(E × E, H × E)`. See note [Manifold type tags] for explanation about `ModelProd H H'`
vs `H × H'`. -/
@[simps (config := .lemmasOnly)]
def ModelWithCorners.prod {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {E' : Type v'} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type w'} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E × E') (ModelProd H H') :=
{ I.toPartialEquiv.prod I'.toPartialEquiv with
toFun := fun x => (I x.1, I' x.2)
invFun := fun x => (I.symm x.1, I'.symm x.2)
source := { x | x.1 ∈ I.source ∧ x.2 ∈ I'.source }
source_eq := by simp only [setOf_true, mfld_simps]
unique_diff' := I.unique_diff'.prod I'.unique_diff'
continuous_toFun := I.continuous_toFun.prod_map I'.continuous_toFun
continuous_invFun := I.continuous_invFun.prod_map I'.continuous_invFun }
#align model_with_corners.prod ModelWithCorners.prod
/-- Given a finite family of `ModelWithCorners` `I i` on `(E i, H i)`, we define the model with
corners `pi I` on `(Π i, E i, ModelPi H)`. See note [Manifold type tags] for explanation about
`ModelPi H`. -/
def ModelWithCorners.pi {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι]
{E : ι → Type w} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)] {H : ι → Type u'}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (H i)] (I : ∀ i, ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E i) (H i)) :
ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (∀ i, E i) (ModelPi H) where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.pi fun i => (I i).toPartialEquiv
source_eq := by simp only [pi_univ, mfld_simps]
unique_diff' := UniqueDiffOn.pi ι E _ _ fun i _ => (I i).unique_diff'
continuous_toFun := continuous_pi fun i => (I i).continuous.comp (continuous_apply i)
continuous_invFun := continuous_pi fun i => (I i).continuous_symm.comp (continuous_apply i)
#align model_with_corners.pi ModelWithCorners.pi
/-- Special case of product model with corners, which is trivial on the second factor. This shows up
as the model to tangent bundles. -/
abbrev ModelWithCorners.tangent {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E × E) (ModelProd H E) :=
I.prod 𝓘(𝕜, E)
#align model_with_corners.tangent ModelWithCorners.tangent
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {F' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F']
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G'] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H}
{J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F G}
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_toPartialEquiv :
(I.prod J).toPartialEquiv = I.toPartialEquiv.prod J.toPartialEquiv :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_to_local_equiv modelWithCorners_prod_toPartialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_coe (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
(I.prod I' : _ × _ → _ × _) = Prod.map I I' :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_coe modelWithCorners_prod_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_coe_symm (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
(I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
((I.prod I').symm : _ × _ → _ × _) = Prod.map I.symm I'.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_coe_symm modelWithCorners_prod_coe_symm
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_prod : 𝓘(𝕜, E × F) = 𝓘(𝕜, E).prod 𝓘(𝕜, F) := by ext1 <;> simp
#align model_with_corners_self_prod modelWithCornersSelf_prod
theorem ModelWithCorners.range_prod : range (I.prod J) = range I ×ˢ range J := by
simp_rw [← ModelWithCorners.target_eq]; rfl
#align model_with_corners.range_prod ModelWithCorners.range_prod
end ModelWithCornersProd
section Boundaryless
/-- Property ensuring that the model with corners `I` defines manifolds without boundary. This
differs from the more general `BoundarylessManifold`, which requires every point on the manifold
to be an interior point. -/
class ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : Prop where
range_eq_univ : range I = univ
#align model_with_corners.boundaryless ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless
theorem ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] :
range I = univ := ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ
/-- If `I` is a `ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless` model, then it is a homeomorphism. -/
@[simps (config := {simpRhs := true})]
def ModelWithCorners.toHomeomorph {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] : H ≃ₜ E where
__ := I
left_inv := I.left_inv
right_inv _ := I.right_inv <| I.range_eq_univ.symm ▸ mem_univ _
/-- The trivial model with corners has no boundary -/
instance modelWithCornersSelf_boundaryless (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : (modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E).Boundaryless :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align model_with_corners_self_boundaryless modelWithCornersSelf_boundaryless
/-- If two model with corners are boundaryless, their product also is -/
instance ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ_prod {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] {E' : Type v'} [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type w'} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H')
[I'.Boundaryless] : (I.prod I').Boundaryless := by
constructor
dsimp [ModelWithCorners.prod, ModelProd]
rw [← prod_range_range_eq, ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ,
ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ, univ_prod_univ]
#align model_with_corners.range_eq_univ_prod ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ_prod
end Boundaryless
section contDiffGroupoid
/-! ### Smooth functions on models with corners -/
variable {m n : ℕ∞} {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M]
variable (n)
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the pregroupoid of `C^n` transformations of `H`
as the maps that are `C^n` when read in `E` through `I`. -/
def contDiffPregroupoid : Pregroupoid H where
property f s := ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
comp {f g u v} hf hg _ _ _ := by
have : I ∘ (g ∘ f) ∘ I.symm = (I ∘ g ∘ I.symm) ∘ I ∘ f ∘ I.symm := by ext x; simp
simp only [this]
refine hg.comp (hf.mono fun x ⟨hx1, hx2⟩ ↦ ⟨hx1.1, hx2⟩) ?_
rintro x ⟨hx1, _⟩
simp only [mfld_simps] at hx1 ⊢
exact hx1.2
id_mem := by
apply ContDiffOn.congr contDiff_id.contDiffOn
rintro x ⟨_, hx2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hx2 with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy]
simp only [mfld_simps]
locality {f u} _ H := by
apply contDiffOn_of_locally_contDiffOn
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hy2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← hx] at hy1 ⊢
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy1 ⊢
rcases H x hy1 with ⟨v, v_open, xv, hv⟩
have : I.symm ⁻¹' (u ∩ v) ∩ range I = I.symm ⁻¹' u ∩ range I ∩ I.symm ⁻¹' v := by
rw [preimage_inter, inter_assoc, inter_assoc]
congr 1
rw [inter_comm]
rw [this] at hv
exact ⟨I.symm ⁻¹' v, v_open.preimage I.continuous_symm, by simpa, hv⟩
congr {f g u} _ fg hf := by
apply hf.congr
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hy2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← hx] at hy1 ⊢
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy1 ⊢
rw [fg _ hy1]
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of invertible `C^n` transformations
of `H` as the invertible maps that are `C^n` when read in `E` through `I`. -/
def contDiffGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H :=
Pregroupoid.groupoid (contDiffPregroupoid n I)
#align cont_diff_groupoid contDiffGroupoid
variable {n}
/-- Inclusion of the groupoid of `C^n` local diffeos in the groupoid of `C^m` local diffeos when
`m ≤ n` -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_le (h : m ≤ n) : contDiffGroupoid n I ≤ contDiffGroupoid m I := by
rw [contDiffGroupoid, contDiffGroupoid]
apply groupoid_of_pregroupoid_le
intro f s hfs
exact ContDiffOn.of_le hfs h
#align cont_diff_groupoid_le contDiffGroupoid_le
/-- The groupoid of `0`-times continuously differentiable maps is just the groupoid of all
partial homeomorphisms -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_zero_eq : contDiffGroupoid 0 I = continuousGroupoid H := by
apply le_antisymm le_top
intro u _
-- we have to check that every partial homeomorphism belongs to `contDiffGroupoid 0 I`,
-- by unfolding its definition
change u ∈ contDiffGroupoid 0 I
rw [contDiffGroupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid, contDiffPregroupoid]
simp only [contDiffOn_zero]
constructor
· refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn (u.continuousOn.comp I.continuousOn_symm ?_)
exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
· refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn (u.symm.continuousOn.comp I.continuousOn_symm ?_)
exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
#align cont_diff_groupoid_zero_eq contDiffGroupoid_zero_eq
variable (n)
/-- An identity partial homeomorphism belongs to the `C^n` groupoid. -/
theorem ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s hs ∈ contDiffGroupoid n I := by
rw [contDiffGroupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid]
suffices h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (I ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) by
simp [h, contDiffPregroupoid]
have : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n id (univ : Set E) := contDiff_id.contDiffOn
exact this.congr_mono (fun x hx => I.right_inv hx.2) (subset_univ _)
#align of_set_mem_cont_diff_groupoid ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid
/-- The composition of a partial homeomorphism from `H` to `M` and its inverse belongs to
the `C^n` groupoid. -/
theorem symm_trans_mem_contDiffGroupoid (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) :
e.symm.trans e ∈ contDiffGroupoid n I :=
haveI : e.symm.trans e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.target e.open_target :=
PartialHomeomorph.symm_trans_self _
StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource _ (ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid n I e.open_target) this
#align symm_trans_mem_cont_diff_groupoid symm_trans_mem_contDiffGroupoid
variable {E' H' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [TopologicalSpace H']
/-- The product of two smooth partial homeomorphisms is smooth. -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_prod {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{e : PartialHomeomorph H H} {e' : PartialHomeomorph H' H'} (he : e ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I)
(he' : e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I') : e.prod e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ (I.prod I') := by
cases' he with he he_symm
cases' he' with he' he'_symm
simp only at he he_symm he' he'_symm
constructor <;> simp only [PartialEquiv.prod_source, PartialHomeomorph.prod_toPartialEquiv,
contDiffPregroupoid]
· have h3 := ContDiffOn.prod_map he he'
rw [← I.image_eq, ← I'.image_eq, prod_image_image_eq] at h3
rw [← (I.prod I').image_eq]
exact h3
· have h3 := ContDiffOn.prod_map he_symm he'_symm
rw [← I.image_eq, ← I'.image_eq, prod_image_image_eq] at h3
rw [← (I.prod I').image_eq]
exact h3
#align cont_diff_groupoid_prod contDiffGroupoid_prod
/-- The `C^n` groupoid is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (contDiffGroupoid n I) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr
(by
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
apply (contDiffGroupoid n I).mem_of_eqOnSource' _ _ _ hes
exact ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid n I hs)
end contDiffGroupoid
section analyticGroupoid
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M]
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of analytic transformations of `H`
as the maps that are analytic and map interior to interior when read in `E` through `I`. We also
explicitly define that they are `C^∞` on the whole domain, since we are only requiring
analyticity on the interior of the domain. -/
def analyticGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H :=
(contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) ⊓ Pregroupoid.groupoid
{ property := fun f s => AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)) ∧
(I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)).image (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) ⊆ interior (range I)
comp := fun {f g u v} hf hg _ _ _ => by
simp only [] at hf hg ⊢
have comp : I ∘ (g ∘ f) ∘ I.symm = (I ∘ g ∘ I.symm) ∘ I ∘ f ∘ I.symm := by ext x; simp
apply And.intro
· simp only [comp, preimage_inter]
refine hg.left.comp (hf.left.mono ?_) ?_
· simp only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_right]
rw [inter_assoc]
simp
· intro x hx
apply And.intro
· rw [mem_preimage, comp_apply, I.left_inv]
exact hx.left.right
· apply hf.right
rw [mem_image]
exact ⟨x, ⟨⟨hx.left.left, hx.right⟩, rfl⟩⟩
· simp only [comp]
rw [image_comp]
intro x hx
rw [mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨x', hx'⟩
refine hg.right ⟨x', And.intro ?_ hx'.right⟩
apply And.intro
· have hx'1 : x' ∈ ((v.preimage f).preimage (I.symm)).image (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) := by
refine image_subset (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) ?_ hx'.left
rw [preimage_inter]
refine Subset.trans ?_ (u.preimage I.symm).inter_subset_right
apply inter_subset_left
rcases hx'1 with ⟨x'', hx''⟩
rw [hx''.right.symm]
simp only [comp_apply, mem_preimage, I.left_inv]
exact hx''.left
· rw [mem_image] at hx'
rcases hx'.left with ⟨x'', hx''⟩
exact hf.right ⟨x'', ⟨⟨hx''.left.left.left, hx''.left.right⟩, hx''.right⟩⟩
id_mem := by
apply And.intro
· simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact AnalyticOn.congr isOpen_interior
(f := (1 : E →L[𝕜] E)) (fun x _ => (1 : E →L[𝕜] E).analyticAt x)
(fun z hz => (I.right_inv (interior_subset hz)).symm)
· intro x hx
simp only [id_comp, comp_apply, preimage_univ, univ_inter, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy.right, I.right_inv (interior_subset hy.left)]
exact hy.left
locality := fun {f u} _ h => by
simp only [] at h
simp only [AnalyticOn]
apply And.intro
· intro x hx
rcases h (I.symm x) (mem_preimage.mp hx.left) with ⟨v, hv⟩
exact hv.right.right.left x ⟨mem_preimage.mpr ⟨hx.left, hv.right.left⟩, hx.right⟩
· apply mapsTo'.mp
simp only [MapsTo]
intro x hx
rcases h (I.symm x) hx.left with ⟨v, hv⟩
apply hv.right.right.right
rw [mem_image]
have hx' := And.intro hx (mem_preimage.mpr hv.right.left)
rw [← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, ← inter_assoc, ← preimage_inter, inter_comm v u] at hx'
exact ⟨x, ⟨hx', rfl⟩⟩
congr := fun {f g u} hu fg hf => by
simp only [] at hf ⊢
apply And.intro
· refine AnalyticOn.congr (IsOpen.inter (hu.preimage I.continuous_symm) isOpen_interior)
hf.left ?_
intro z hz
simp only [comp_apply]
rw [fg (I.symm z) hz.left]
· intro x hx
apply hf.right
rw [mem_image] at hx ⊢
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, ⟨hy.left, ?_⟩⟩
rw [comp_apply, comp_apply, fg (I.symm y) hy.left.left] at hy
exact hy.right }
/-- An identity partial homeomorphism belongs to the analytic groupoid. -/
theorem ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s hs ∈ analyticGroupoid I := by
rw [analyticGroupoid]
refine And.intro (ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid ∞ I hs) ?_
apply mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr
suffices h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)) ∧
(I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)).image (I ∘ I.symm) ⊆ interior (range I) by
simp only [PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_apply, id_comp, PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_toPartialEquiv,
PartialEquiv.ofSet_source, h, comp_apply, mem_range, image_subset_iff, true_and,
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_symm, PartialEquiv.ofSet_target, and_self]
intro x hx
refine mem_preimage.mpr ?_
rw [← I.right_inv (interior_subset hx.right)] at hx
exact hx.right
apply And.intro
· have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (1 : E →L[𝕜] E) (univ : Set E) := (fun x _ => (1 : E →L[𝕜] E).analyticAt x)
exact (this.mono (subset_univ (s.preimage (I.symm) ∩ interior (range I)))).congr
((hs.preimage I.continuous_symm).inter isOpen_interior)
fun z hz => (I.right_inv (interior_subset hz.right)).symm
· intro x hx
simp only [comp_apply, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy.right, I.right_inv (interior_subset hy.left.right)]
exact hy.left.right
/-- The composition of a partial homeomorphism from `H` to `M` and its inverse belongs to
the analytic groupoid. -/
theorem symm_trans_mem_analyticGroupoid (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) :
e.symm.trans e ∈ analyticGroupoid I :=
haveI : e.symm.trans e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.target e.open_target :=
PartialHomeomorph.symm_trans_self _
StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource _ (ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid I e.open_target) this
/-- The analytic groupoid is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (analyticGroupoid I) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr
(by
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
apply (analyticGroupoid I).mem_of_eqOnSource' _ _ _ hes
exact ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid I hs)
/-- The analytic groupoid on a boundaryless charted space modeled on a complete vector space
consists of the partial homeomorphisms which are analytic and have analytic inverse. -/
theorem mem_analyticGroupoid_of_boundaryless [CompleteSpace E] [I.Boundaryless]
(e : PartialHomeomorph H H) :
e ∈ analyticGroupoid I ↔ AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ e ∘ I.symm) (I '' e.source) ∧
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ e.symm ∘ I.symm) (I '' e.target) := by
apply Iff.intro
· intro he
have := mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mp he.right
simp only [I.image_eq, I.range_eq_univ, interior_univ, subset_univ, and_true] at this ⊢
exact this
· intro he
apply And.intro
all_goals apply mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr; simp only [I.image_eq, I.range_eq_univ,
interior_univ, subset_univ, and_true, contDiffPregroupoid] at he ⊢
· exact ⟨he.left.contDiffOn, he.right.contDiffOn⟩
· exact he
end analyticGroupoid
section SmoothManifoldWithCorners
/-! ### Smooth manifolds with corners -/
/-- Typeclass defining smooth manifolds with corners with respect to a model with corners, over a
field `𝕜` and with infinite smoothness to simplify typeclass search and statements later on. -/
class SmoothManifoldWithCorners {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] extends
HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) : Prop
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk' {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
[gr : HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)] : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M :=
{ gr with }
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.mk' SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk'
theorem smoothManifoldWithCorners_of_contDiffOn {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
(h : ∀ e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H, e ∈ atlas H M → e' ∈ atlas H M →
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ⊤ (I ∘ e.symm ≫ₕ e' ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' (e.symm ≫ₕ e').source ∩ range I)) :
SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M where
compatible := by
haveI : HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) := hasGroupoid_of_pregroupoid _ (h _ _)
apply StructureGroupoid.compatible
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners_of_cont_diff_on smoothManifoldWithCorners_of_contDiffOn
/-- For any model with corners, the model space is a smooth manifold -/
instance model_space_smooth {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I H :=
{ hasGroupoid_model_space _ _ with }
#align model_space_smooth model_space_smooth
end SmoothManifoldWithCorners
namespace SmoothManifoldWithCorners
/- We restate in the namespace `SmoothManifoldWithCorners` some lemmas that hold for general
charted space with a structure groupoid, avoiding the need to specify the groupoid
`contDiffGroupoid ∞ I` explicitly. -/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*)
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
/-- The maximal atlas of `M` for the smooth manifold with corners structure corresponding to the
model with corners `I`. -/
def maximalAtlas :=
(contDiffGroupoid ∞ I).maximalAtlas M
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.maximalAtlas
variable {M}
theorem subset_maximalAtlas [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] : atlas H M ⊆ maximalAtlas I M :=
StructureGroupoid.subset_maximalAtlas _
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.subset_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.subset_maximalAtlas
theorem chart_mem_maximalAtlas [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (x : M) :
chartAt H x ∈ maximalAtlas I M :=
StructureGroupoid.chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ x
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.chart_mem_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.chart_mem_maximalAtlas
variable {I}
theorem compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas {e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) : e.symm.trans e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ∞ I :=
StructureGroupoid.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he'
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.compatible_of_mem_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas
/-- The product of two smooth manifolds with corners is naturally a smooth manifold with corners. -/
instance prod {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (M' : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I' M'] : SmoothManifoldWithCorners (I.prod I') (M × M') where
compatible := by
rintro f g ⟨f1, hf1, f2, hf2, rfl⟩ ⟨g1, hg1, g2, hg2, rfl⟩
rw [PartialHomeomorph.prod_symm, PartialHomeomorph.prod_trans]
have h1 := (contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I).compatible hf1 hg1
have h2 := (contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I').compatible hf2 hg2
exact contDiffGroupoid_prod h1 h2
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.prod SmoothManifoldWithCorners.prod
end SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem PartialHomeomorph.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) (h : e.source = Set.univ) :
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners 𝕜 _ E _ _ H _ I M _ (e.singletonChartedSpace h) :=
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (id _) <|
e.singleton_hasGroupoid h (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)
#align local_homeomorph.singleton_smooth_manifold_with_corners PartialHomeomorph.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem OpenEmbedding.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [Nonempty M] {f : M → H}
(h : OpenEmbedding f) :
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners 𝕜 _ E _ _ H _ I M _ h.singletonChartedSpace :=
(h.toPartialHomeomorph f).singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners I (by simp)
#align open_embedding.singleton_smooth_manifold_with_corners OpenEmbedding.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
namespace TopologicalSpace.Opens
open TopologicalSpace
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (s : Opens M)
instance : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I s :=
{ s.instHasGroupoid (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) with }
end TopologicalSpace.Opens
section ExtendedCharts
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 E M H E' M' H' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M] (f f' : PartialHomeomorph M H)
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [TopologicalSpace H']
[TopologicalSpace M'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') {s t : Set M}
/-!
### Extended charts
In a smooth manifold with corners, the model space is the space `H`. However, we will also
need to use extended charts taking values in the model vector space `E`. These extended charts are
not `PartialHomeomorph` as the target is not open in `E` in general, but we can still register them
as `PartialEquiv`.
-/
namespace PartialHomeomorph
/-- Given a chart `f` on a manifold with corners, `f.extend I` is the extended chart to the model
vector space. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
def extend : PartialEquiv M E :=
f.toPartialEquiv ≫ I.toPartialEquiv
#align local_homeomorph.extend PartialHomeomorph.extend
theorem extend_coe : ⇑(f.extend I) = I ∘ f :=
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coe PartialHomeomorph.extend_coe
theorem extend_coe_symm : ⇑(f.extend I).symm = f.symm ∘ I.symm :=
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coe_symm PartialHomeomorph.extend_coe_symm
theorem extend_source : (f.extend I).source = f.source := by
rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_source, I.source_eq, preimage_univ, inter_univ]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source PartialHomeomorph.extend_source
theorem isOpen_extend_source : IsOpen (f.extend I).source := by
rw [extend_source]
exact f.open_source
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_source PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_source
theorem extend_target : (f.extend I).target = I.symm ⁻¹' f.target ∩ range I := by
simp_rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_target, I.target_eq, I.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm, inter_comm]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target PartialHomeomorph.extend_target
theorem extend_target' : (f.extend I).target = I '' f.target := by
rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_target'', I.source_eq, univ_inter, I.toPartialEquiv_coe]
lemma isOpen_extend_target [I.Boundaryless] : IsOpen (f.extend I).target := by
rw [extend_target, I.range_eq_univ, inter_univ]
exact I.continuous_symm.isOpen_preimage _ f.open_target
theorem mapsTo_extend (hs : s ⊆ f.source) :
MapsTo (f.extend I) s ((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) := by
rw [mapsTo', extend_coe, extend_coe_symm, preimage_comp, ← I.image_eq, image_comp,
f.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage hs]
exact image_subset _ inter_subset_right
#align local_homeomorph.maps_to_extend PartialHomeomorph.mapsTo_extend
theorem extend_left_inv {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I x) = x :=
(f.extend I).left_inv <| by rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_left_inv PartialHomeomorph.extend_left_inv
/-- Variant of `f.extend_left_inv I`, stated in terms of images. -/
lemma extend_left_inv' (ht: t ⊆ f.source) : ((f.extend I).symm ∘ (f.extend I)) '' t = t :=
EqOn.image_eq_self (fun _ hx ↦ f.extend_left_inv I (ht hx))
theorem extend_source_mem_nhds {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(isOpen_extend_source f I).mem_nhds <| by rwa [f.extend_source I]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds PartialHomeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds
theorem extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds <| extend_source_mem_nhds f I h
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem continuousOn_extend : ContinuousOn (f.extend I) (f.extend I).source := by
refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn ?_
rw [extend_source]
exact f.continuousOn
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_on_extend PartialHomeomorph.continuousOn_extend
theorem continuousAt_extend {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : ContinuousAt (f.extend I) x :=
(continuousOn_extend f I).continuousAt <| extend_source_mem_nhds f I h
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend
theorem map_extend_nhds {x : M} (hy : x ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] f.extend I x := by
rwa [extend_coe, comp_apply, ← I.map_nhds_eq, ← f.map_nhds_eq, map_map]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhds
theorem map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] {x : M} (hx : x ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (f.extend I x) := by
rw [f.map_extend_nhds _ hx, I.range_eq_univ, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
(f.extend I).target ∈ 𝓝[range I] f.extend I y := by
rw [← PartialEquiv.image_source_eq_target, ← map_extend_nhds f I hy]
exact image_mem_map (extend_source_mem_nhds _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] {x} (hx : x ∈ f.source)
{s : Set M} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : (f.extend I) '' s ∈ 𝓝 ((f.extend I) x) := by
rw [← f.map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless _ hx, Filter.mem_map]
filter_upwards [h] using subset_preimage_image (f.extend I) s
theorem extend_target_subset_range : (f.extend I).target ⊆ range I := by simp only [mfld_simps]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target_subset_range PartialHomeomorph.extend_target_subset_range
lemma interior_extend_target_subset_interior_range :
interior (f.extend I).target ⊆ interior (range I) := by
rw [f.extend_target, interior_inter, (f.open_target.preimage I.continuous_symm).interior_eq]
exact inter_subset_right
/-- If `y ∈ f.target` and `I y ∈ interior (range I)`,
then `I y` is an interior point of `(I ∘ f).target`. -/
lemma mem_interior_extend_target {y : H} (hy : y ∈ f.target)
(hy' : I y ∈ interior (range I)) : I y ∈ interior (f.extend I).target := by
rw [f.extend_target, interior_inter, (f.open_target.preimage I.continuous_symm).interior_eq,
mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage]
exact ⟨mem_of_eq_of_mem (I.left_inv (y)) hy, hy'⟩
theorem nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
𝓝[(f.extend I).target] f.extend I y = 𝓝[range I] f.extend I y :=
(nhdsWithin_mono _ (extend_target_subset_range _ _)).antisymm <|
nhdsWithin_le_of_mem (extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.nhds_within_extend_target_eq PartialHomeomorph.nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq
theorem continuousAt_extend_symm' {x : E} (h : x ∈ (f.extend I).target) :
ContinuousAt (f.extend I).symm x :=
(f.continuousAt_symm h.2).comp I.continuous_symm.continuousAt
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend_symm' PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend_symm'
theorem continuousAt_extend_symm {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) :
ContinuousAt (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I x) :=
continuousAt_extend_symm' f I <| (f.extend I).map_source <| by rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend_symm PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend_symm
theorem continuousOn_extend_symm : ContinuousOn (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I).target := fun _ h =>
(continuousAt_extend_symm' _ _ h).continuousWithinAt
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_on_extend_symm PartialHomeomorph.continuousOn_extend_symm
theorem extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff {X} [TopologicalSpace X] {g : M → X}
{s : Set M} {x : M} :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ (f.extend I).symm) ((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (f.extend I x) ↔
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f.symm) (f.symm ⁻¹' s) (f x) := by
rw [← I.symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff]; rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_continuous_within_at_comp_right_iff PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff
theorem isOpen_extend_preimage' {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen ((f.extend I).source ∩ f.extend I ⁻¹' s) :=
(continuousOn_extend f I).isOpen_inter_preimage (isOpen_extend_source _ _) hs
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_preimage' PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_preimage'
theorem isOpen_extend_preimage {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (f.source ∩ f.extend I ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← extend_source f I]; exact isOpen_extend_preimage' f I hs
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_preimage PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_preimage
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[f.extend I '' ((f.extend I).source ∩ s)] f.extend I y := by
set e := f.extend I
calc
map e (𝓝[s] y) = map e (𝓝[e.source ∩ s] y) :=
congr_arg (map e) (nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem (extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin f I hy)).symm
_ = 𝓝[e '' (e.source ∩ s)] e y :=
((f.extend I).leftInvOn.mono inter_subset_left).map_nhdsWithin_eq
((f.extend I).left_inv <| by rwa [f.extend_source])
(continuousAt_extend_symm f I hy).continuousWithinAt
(continuousAt_extend f I hy).continuousWithinAt
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds_within_eq_image PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) (hs : s ⊆ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[f.extend I '' s] f.extend I y := by
rw [map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image _ _ hy, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right]
rwa [extend_source]
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I y := by
rw [map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image f I hy, nhdsWithin_inter, ←
nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq _ _ hy, ← nhdsWithin_inter, (f.extend I).image_source_inter_eq',
inter_comm]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I).symm (𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I y) = 𝓝[s] y := by
rw [← map_extend_nhdsWithin f I hy, map_map, Filter.map_congr, map_id]
exact (f.extend I).leftInvOn.eqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem (extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin_range {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I).symm (𝓝[range I] f.extend I y) = 𝓝 y := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ, ← map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin f I hy, preimage_univ, univ_inter]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhds_within_range PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin_range
theorem tendsto_extend_comp_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {g : α → M}
(hg : ∀ᶠ z in l, g z ∈ f.source) {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
Tendsto (f.extend I ∘ g) l (𝓝 (f.extend I y)) ↔ Tendsto g l (𝓝 y) := by
refine ⟨fun h u hu ↦ mem_map.2 ?_, (continuousAt_extend _ _ hy).tendsto.comp⟩
have := (f.continuousAt_extend_symm I hy).tendsto.comp h
rw [extend_left_inv _ _ hy] at this
filter_upwards [hg, mem_map.1 (this hu)] with z hz hzu
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), extend_left_inv _ _ hz, mem_preimage] using hzu
-- there is no definition `writtenInExtend` but we already use some made-up names in this file
theorem continuousWithinAt_writtenInExtend_iff {f' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {g : M → M'} {y : M}
(hy : y ∈ f.source) (hgy : g y ∈ f'.source) (hmaps : MapsTo g s f'.source) :
ContinuousWithinAt (f'.extend I' ∘ g ∘ (f.extend I).symm)
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (f.extend I y) ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s y := by
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
simp only [comp_apply]
rw [extend_left_inv _ _ hy, f'.tendsto_extend_comp_iff _ _ hgy,
← f.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin I hy, tendsto_map'_iff]
rw [← f.map_extend_nhdsWithin I hy, eventually_map]
filter_upwards [inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (f.open_source.mem_nhds hy)] with z hz
rw [comp_apply, extend_left_inv _ _ hz.2]
exact hmaps hz.1
-- there is no definition `writtenInExtend` but we already use some made-up names in this file
/-- If `s ⊆ f.source` and `g x ∈ f'.source` whenever `x ∈ s`, then `g` is continuous on `s` if and
only if `g` written in charts `f.extend I` and `f'.extend I'` is continuous on `f.extend I '' s`. -/
theorem continuousOn_writtenInExtend_iff {f' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {g : M → M'}
(hs : s ⊆ f.source) (hmaps : MapsTo g s f'.source) :
ContinuousOn (f'.extend I' ∘ g ∘ (f.extend I).symm) (f.extend I '' s) ↔ ContinuousOn g s := by
refine forall_mem_image.trans <| forall₂_congr fun x hx ↦ ?_
refine (continuousWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_).trans
(continuousWithinAt_writtenInExtend_iff _ _ _ (hs hx) (hmaps hx) hmaps)
rw [← map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset, ← map_extend_nhdsWithin]
exacts [hs hx, hs hx, hs]
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of a point
in the source is a neighborhood of the preimage, within a set. -/
theorem extend_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I x := by
rwa [← map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin f I h, mem_map] at ht
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_preimage_mem_nhds {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 (f.extend I x) := by
apply (continuousAt_extend_symm f I h).preimage_mem_nhds
rwa [(f.extend I).left_inv]
rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds
/-- Technical lemma to rewrite suitably the preimage of an intersection under an extended chart, to
bring it into a convenient form to apply derivative lemmas. -/
theorem extend_preimage_inter_eq :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) ∩ range I =
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I ∩ (f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t := by
mfld_set_tac
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_inter_eq PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_inter_eq
-- Porting note: an `aux` lemma that is no longer needed. Delete?
theorem extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq_aux {s : Set M} {x : M} (hx : x ∈ f.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I : Set _) =ᶠ[𝓝 (f.extend I x)]
((f.extend I).target ∩ (f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s : Set _) := by
rw [f.extend_target, inter_assoc, inter_comm (range I)]
conv =>
congr
· skip
rw [← univ_inter (_ ∩ range I)]
refine (eventuallyEq_univ.mpr ?_).symm.inter EventuallyEq.rfl
refine I.continuousAt_symm.preimage_mem_nhds (f.open_target.mem_nhds ?_)
simp_rw [f.extend_coe, Function.comp_apply, I.left_inv, f.mapsTo hx]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventually_eq_aux PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq_aux
theorem extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq {s : Set M} {x : M} (hs : s ⊆ f.source)
(hx : x ∈ f.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I : Set _) =ᶠ[𝓝 (f.extend I x)] f.extend I '' s := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq, ← map_extend_nhdsWithin _ _ hx,
map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset _ _ hx hs]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventually_eq PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq
/-! We use the name `extend_coord_change` for `(f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I`. -/
theorem extend_coord_change_source :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source = I '' (f.symm ≫ₕ f').source := by
simp_rw [PartialEquiv.trans_source, I.image_eq, extend_source, PartialEquiv.symm_source,
extend_target, inter_right_comm _ (range I)]
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source
theorem extend_image_source_inter :
f.extend I '' (f.source ∩ f'.source) = ((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source := by
simp_rw [f.extend_coord_change_source, f.extend_coe, image_comp I f, trans_source'', symm_symm,
symm_target]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_image_source_inter PartialHomeomorph.extend_image_source_inter
theorem extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ ((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source) :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[range I] x := by
rw [f.extend_coord_change_source] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ := hx
refine I.image_mem_nhdsWithin ?_
exact (PartialHomeomorph.open_source _).mem_nhds hx
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin' {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source)
(hxf' : x ∈ f'.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[range I] f.extend I x := by
apply extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin
rw [← extend_image_source_inter]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨hxf, hxf'⟩
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhds_within' PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin'
variable {f f'}
open SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem contDiffOn_extend_coord_change [ChartedSpace H M] (hf : f ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hf' : f' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ⊤ (f.extend I ∘ (f'.extend I).symm) ((f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I).source := by
rw [extend_coord_change_source, I.image_eq]
exact (StructureGroupoid.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas hf' hf).1
#align local_homeomorph.cont_diff_on_extend_coord_change PartialHomeomorph.contDiffOn_extend_coord_change
theorem contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change [ChartedSpace H M] (hf : f ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hf' : f' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ ((f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I).source) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ⊤ (f.extend I ∘ (f'.extend I).symm) (range I) x := by
apply (contDiffOn_extend_coord_change I hf hf' x hx).mono_of_mem
rw [extend_coord_change_source] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩ := hx
exact I.image_mem_nhdsWithin ((PartialHomeomorph.open_source _).mem_nhds hz)
#align local_homeomorph.cont_diff_within_at_extend_coord_change PartialHomeomorph.contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change
theorem contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change' [ChartedSpace H M] (hf : f ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hf' : f' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source) (hxf' : x ∈ f'.source) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ⊤ (f.extend I ∘ (f'.extend I).symm) (range I) (f'.extend I x) := by
refine contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change I hf hf' ?_
rw [← extend_image_source_inter]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨hxf', hxf⟩
#align local_homeomorph.cont_diff_within_at_extend_coord_change' PartialHomeomorph.contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change'
end PartialHomeomorph
open PartialHomeomorph
variable [ChartedSpace H M] [ChartedSpace H' M']
/-- The preferred extended chart on a manifold with corners around a point `x`, from a neighborhood
of `x` to the model vector space. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
def extChartAt (x : M) : PartialEquiv M E :=
(chartAt H x).extend I
#align ext_chart_at extChartAt
theorem extChartAt_coe (x : M) : ⇑(extChartAt I x) = I ∘ chartAt H x :=
rfl
#align ext_chart_at_coe extChartAt_coe
theorem extChartAt_coe_symm (x : M) : ⇑(extChartAt I x).symm = (chartAt H x).symm ∘ I.symm :=
rfl
#align ext_chart_at_coe_symm extChartAt_coe_symm
theorem extChartAt_source (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).source = (chartAt H x).source :=
extend_source _ _
#align ext_chart_at_source extChartAt_source
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_source (x : M) : IsOpen (extChartAt I x).source :=
isOpen_extend_source _ _
#align is_open_ext_chart_at_source isOpen_extChartAt_source
theorem mem_extChartAt_source (x : M) : x ∈ (extChartAt I x).source := by
simp only [extChartAt_source, mem_chart_source]
#align mem_ext_chart_source mem_extChartAt_source
theorem mem_extChartAt_target (x : M) : extChartAt I x x ∈ (extChartAt I x).target :=
(extChartAt I x).map_source <| mem_extChartAt_source _ _
theorem extChartAt_target (x : M) :
(extChartAt I x).target = I.symm ⁻¹' (chartAt H x).target ∩ range I :=
extend_target _ _
#align ext_chart_at_target extChartAt_target
theorem uniqueDiffOn_extChartAt_target (x : M) : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I x).target := by
rw [extChartAt_target]
exact I.unique_diff_preimage (chartAt H x).open_target
theorem uniqueDiffWithinAt_extChartAt_target (x : M) :
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I x).target (extChartAt I x x) :=
uniqueDiffOn_extChartAt_target I x _ <| mem_extChartAt_target I x
theorem extChartAt_to_inv (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).symm ((extChartAt I x) x) = x :=
(extChartAt I x).left_inv (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align ext_chart_at_to_inv extChartAt_to_inv
theorem mapsTo_extChartAt {x : M} (hs : s ⊆ (chartAt H x).source) :
MapsTo (extChartAt I x) s ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) :=
mapsTo_extend _ _ hs
#align maps_to_ext_chart_at mapsTo_extChartAt
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
(extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝 x' :=
extend_source_mem_nhds _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds' extChartAt_source_mem_nhds'
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝 x :=
extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds extChartAt_source_mem_nhds
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
(extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝[s] x' :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' I h)
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds_within' extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin'
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds I x)
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds_within extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem continuousOn_extChartAt (x : M) : ContinuousOn (extChartAt I x) (extChartAt I x).source :=
continuousOn_extend _ _
#align continuous_on_ext_chart_at continuousOn_extChartAt
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x) x' :=
continuousAt_extend _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at' continuousAt_extChartAt'
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt (x : M) : ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x) x :=
continuousAt_extChartAt' _ (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at continuousAt_extChartAt
theorem map_extChartAt_nhds' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝 y) = 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y :=
map_extend_nhds _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds' map_extChartAt_nhds'
theorem map_extChartAt_nhds (x : M) : map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x x :=
map_extChartAt_nhds' I <| mem_extChartAt_source I x
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds map_extChartAt_nhds
theorem map_extChartAt_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x) := by
rw [extChartAt]
exact map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless (chartAt H x) I (mem_chart_source H x)
variable {x} in
theorem extChartAt_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless]
{x : M} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : extChartAt I x '' s ∈ 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x) := by
rw [extChartAt]
exact extend_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless _ I (mem_chart_source H x) hx
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
(extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y :=
extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align ext_chart_at_target_mem_nhds_within' extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin'
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin (x : M) :
(extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x x :=
extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align ext_chart_at_target_mem_nhds_within extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin
/-- If we're boundaryless, `extChartAt` has open target -/
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_target [I.Boundaryless] (x : M) : IsOpen (extChartAt I x).target := by
simp_rw [extChartAt_target, I.range_eq_univ, inter_univ]
exact (PartialHomeomorph.open_target _).preimage I.continuous_symm
/-- If we're boundaryless, `(extChartAt I x).target` is a neighborhood of the key point -/
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhds [I.Boundaryless] (x : M) :
(extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x) := by
convert extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin I x
simp only [I.range_eq_univ, nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- If we're boundaryless, `(extChartAt I x).target` is a neighborhood of any of its points -/
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhds' [I.Boundaryless] {x : M} {y : E}
(m : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).target) : (extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝 y :=
(isOpen_extChartAt_target I x).mem_nhds m
theorem extChartAt_target_subset_range (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).target ⊆ range I := by
simp only [mfld_simps]
#align ext_chart_at_target_subset_range extChartAt_target_subset_range
theorem nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).target] extChartAt I x y = 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y :=
nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align nhds_within_ext_chart_at_target_eq' nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq'
theorem nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq (x : M) :
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).target] (extChartAt I x) x = 𝓝[range I] (extChartAt I x) x :=
nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align nhds_within_ext_chart_at_target_eq nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'' {x : M} {y : E} (h : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).target) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x).symm y :=
continuousAt_extend_symm' _ _ h
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at_symm'' continuousAt_extChartAt_symm''
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt_symm' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x).symm (extChartAt I x x') :=
continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'' I <| (extChartAt I x).map_source h
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at_symm' continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt_symm (x : M) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x).symm ((extChartAt I x) x) :=
continuousAt_extChartAt_symm' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at_symm continuousAt_extChartAt_symm
theorem continuousOn_extChartAt_symm (x : M) :
ContinuousOn (extChartAt I x).symm (extChartAt I x).target :=
fun _y hy => (continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'' _ hy).continuousWithinAt
#align continuous_on_ext_chart_at_symm continuousOn_extChartAt_symm
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_preimage' (x : M) {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen ((extChartAt I x).source ∩ extChartAt I x ⁻¹' s) :=
isOpen_extend_preimage' _ _ hs
#align is_open_ext_chart_at_preimage' isOpen_extChartAt_preimage'
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_preimage (x : M) {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen ((chartAt H x).source ∩ extChartAt I x ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← extChartAt_source I]
exact isOpen_extChartAt_preimage' I x hs
#align is_open_ext_chart_at_preimage isOpen_extChartAt_preimage
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] y) =
𝓝[extChartAt I x '' ((extChartAt I x).source ∩ s)] extChartAt I x y :=
map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within_eq_image' map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image'
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] x) =
𝓝[extChartAt I x '' ((extChartAt I x).source ∩ s)] extChartAt I x x :=
map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within_eq_image map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x y :=
map_extend_nhdsWithin _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within' map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin'
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x x :=
map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x y) =
𝓝[s] y :=
map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within' map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin'
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y) = 𝓝 y :=
map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin_range _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within_range' map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range'
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x x) =
𝓝[s] x :=
map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x x) = 𝓝 x :=
map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within_range map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of a point
in the source is a neighborhood of the preimage, within a set. -/
theorem extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') :
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x) x' := by
rwa [← map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin' I h, mem_map] at ht
#align ext_chart_at_preimage_mem_nhds_within' extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of the
base point is a neighborhood of the preimage, within a set. -/
theorem extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {x : M} (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x) x :=
extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x) ht
#align ext_chart_at_preimage_mem_nhds_within extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x') : (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x') :=
extend_preimage_mem_nhds _ _ (by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]) ht
#align ext_chart_at_preimage_mem_nhds' extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds'
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of a point
is a neighborhood of the preimage. -/
theorem extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds {x : M} (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 ((extChartAt I x) x) := by
apply (continuousAt_extChartAt_symm I x).preimage_mem_nhds
rwa [(extChartAt I x).left_inv (mem_extChartAt_source _ _)]
#align ext_chart_at_preimage_mem_nhds extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds
/-- Technical lemma to rewrite suitably the preimage of an intersection under an extended chart, to
bring it into a convenient form to apply derivative lemmas. -/
theorem extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq (x : M) :
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) ∩ range I =
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t := by
mfld_set_tac
#align ext_chart_at_preimage_inter_eq extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/SmoothManifoldWithCorners.lean | 1,534 | 1,541 | theorem ContinuousWithinAt.nhdsWithin_extChartAt_symm_preimage_inter_range
{f : M → M'} {x : M} (hc : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x x) =
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source)] (extChartAt I x x) := by |
rw [← (extChartAt I x).image_source_inter_eq', ← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image,
← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem']
exact hc (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds _ _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.SpecificFunctions
/-!
# Differentiability of models with corners and (extended) charts
In this file, we analyse the differentiability of charts, models with corners and extended charts.
We show that
* models with corners are differentiable
* charts are differentiable on their source
* `mdifferentiableOn_extChartAt`: `extChartAt` is differentiable on its source
Suppose a partial homeomorphism `e` is differentiable. This file shows
* `PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.mfderiv`: its derivative is a continuous linear equivalence
* `PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.mfderiv_bijective`: its derivative is bijective;
there are also spelling with trivial kernel and full range
In particular, (extended) charts have bijective differential.
## Tags
charts, differentiable, bijective
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Manifold
open Bundle Set Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
(I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E''] {H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'']
(I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H'') {M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
section ModelWithCorners
namespace ModelWithCorners
/-! #### Model with corners -/
protected theorem hasMFDerivAt {x} : HasMFDerivAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E) I x (ContinuousLinearMap.id _ _) :=
⟨I.continuousAt, (hasFDerivWithinAt_id _ _).congr' I.rightInvOn (mem_range_self _)⟩
#align model_with_corners.has_mfderiv_at ModelWithCorners.hasMFDerivAt
protected theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt {s x} :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E) I s x (ContinuousLinearMap.id _ _) :=
I.hasMFDerivAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.has_mfderiv_within_at ModelWithCorners.hasMFDerivWithinAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt {s x} : MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E) I s x :=
I.hasMFDerivWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.mdifferentiable_within_at ModelWithCorners.mdifferentiableWithinAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableAt {x} : MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E) I x :=
I.hasMFDerivAt.mdifferentiableAt
#align model_with_corners.mdifferentiable_at ModelWithCorners.mdifferentiableAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableOn {s} : MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E) I s := fun _ _ =>
I.mdifferentiableWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.mdifferentiable_on ModelWithCorners.mdifferentiableOn
protected theorem mdifferentiable : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E) I := fun _ => I.mdifferentiableAt
#align model_with_corners.mdifferentiable ModelWithCorners.mdifferentiable
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_symm {x} (hx : x ∈ range I) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I I.symm (range I) x (ContinuousLinearMap.id _ _) :=
⟨I.continuousWithinAt_symm,
(hasFDerivWithinAt_id _ _).congr' (fun _y hy => I.rightInvOn hy.1) ⟨hx, mem_range_self _⟩⟩
#align model_with_corners.has_mfderiv_within_at_symm ModelWithCorners.hasMFDerivWithinAt_symm
theorem mdifferentiableOn_symm : MDifferentiableOn 𝓘(𝕜, E) I I.symm (range I) := fun _x hx =>
(I.hasMFDerivWithinAt_symm hx).mdifferentiableWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.mdifferentiable_on_symm ModelWithCorners.mdifferentiableOn_symm
end ModelWithCorners
end ModelWithCorners
section Charts
variable [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I' M']
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I'' M''] {e : PartialHomeomorph M H}
theorem mdifferentiableAt_atlas (h : e ∈ atlas H M) {x : M} (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I e x := by
rw [mdifferentiableAt_iff]
refine ⟨(e.continuousOn x hx).continuousAt (e.open_source.mem_nhds hx), ?_⟩
have mem :
I ((chartAt H x : M → H) x) ∈ I.symm ⁻¹' ((chartAt H x).symm ≫ₕ e).source ∩ range I := by
simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
have : (chartAt H x).symm.trans e ∈ contDiffGroupoid ∞ I :=
HasGroupoid.compatible (chart_mem_atlas H x) h
have A :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ (I ∘ (chartAt H x).symm.trans e ∘ I.symm)
(I.symm ⁻¹' ((chartAt H x).symm.trans e).source ∩ range I) :=
this.1
have B := A.differentiableOn le_top (I ((chartAt H x : M → H) x)) mem
simp only [mfld_simps] at B
rw [inter_comm, differentiableWithinAt_inter] at B
· simpa only [mfld_simps]
· apply IsOpen.mem_nhds ((PartialHomeomorph.open_source _).preimage I.continuous_symm) mem.1
#align mdifferentiable_at_atlas mdifferentiableAt_atlas
theorem mdifferentiableOn_atlas (h : e ∈ atlas H M) : MDifferentiableOn I I e e.source :=
fun _x hx => (mdifferentiableAt_atlas I h hx).mdifferentiableWithinAt
#align mdifferentiable_on_atlas mdifferentiableOn_atlas
theorem mdifferentiableAt_atlas_symm (h : e ∈ atlas H M) {x : H} (hx : x ∈ e.target) :
MDifferentiableAt I I e.symm x := by
rw [mdifferentiableAt_iff]
refine ⟨(e.continuousOn_symm x hx).continuousAt (e.open_target.mem_nhds hx), ?_⟩
have mem : I x ∈ I.symm ⁻¹' (e.symm ≫ₕ chartAt H (e.symm x)).source ∩ range I := by
simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
have : e.symm.trans (chartAt H (e.symm x)) ∈ contDiffGroupoid ∞ I :=
HasGroupoid.compatible h (chart_mem_atlas H _)
have A :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ (I ∘ e.symm.trans (chartAt H (e.symm x)) ∘ I.symm)
(I.symm ⁻¹' (e.symm.trans (chartAt H (e.symm x))).source ∩ range I) :=
this.1
have B := A.differentiableOn le_top (I x) mem
simp only [mfld_simps] at B
rw [inter_comm, differentiableWithinAt_inter] at B
· simpa only [mfld_simps]
· apply IsOpen.mem_nhds ((PartialHomeomorph.open_source _).preimage I.continuous_symm) mem.1
#align mdifferentiable_at_atlas_symm mdifferentiableAt_atlas_symm
theorem mdifferentiableOn_atlas_symm (h : e ∈ atlas H M) : MDifferentiableOn I I e.symm e.target :=
fun _x hx => (mdifferentiableAt_atlas_symm I h hx).mdifferentiableWithinAt
#align mdifferentiable_on_atlas_symm mdifferentiableOn_atlas_symm
theorem mdifferentiable_of_mem_atlas (h : e ∈ atlas H M) : e.MDifferentiable I I :=
⟨mdifferentiableOn_atlas I h, mdifferentiableOn_atlas_symm I h⟩
#align mdifferentiable_of_mem_atlas mdifferentiable_of_mem_atlas
theorem mdifferentiable_chart (x : M) : (chartAt H x).MDifferentiable I I :=
mdifferentiable_of_mem_atlas _ (chart_mem_atlas _ _)
#align mdifferentiable_chart mdifferentiable_chart
/-- The derivative of the chart at a base point is the chart of the tangent bundle, composed with
the identification between the tangent bundle of the model space and the product space. -/
theorem tangentMap_chart {p q : TangentBundle I M} (h : q.1 ∈ (chartAt H p.1).source) :
tangentMap I I (chartAt H p.1) q =
(TotalSpace.toProd _ _).symm
((chartAt (ModelProd H E) p : TangentBundle I M → ModelProd H E) q) := by
dsimp [tangentMap]
rw [MDifferentiableAt.mfderiv]
· rfl
· exact mdifferentiableAt_atlas _ (chart_mem_atlas _ _) h
#align tangent_map_chart tangentMap_chart
/-- The derivative of the inverse of the chart at a base point is the inverse of the chart of the
tangent bundle, composed with the identification between the tangent bundle of the model space and
the product space. -/
theorem tangentMap_chart_symm {p : TangentBundle I M} {q : TangentBundle I H}
(h : q.1 ∈ (chartAt H p.1).target) :
tangentMap I I (chartAt H p.1).symm q =
(chartAt (ModelProd H E) p).symm (TotalSpace.toProd H E q) := by
dsimp only [tangentMap]
rw [MDifferentiableAt.mfderiv (mdifferentiableAt_atlas_symm _ (chart_mem_atlas _ _) h)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe, TangentBundle.chartAt, h, tangentBundleCore,
mfld_simps, (· ∘ ·)]
-- `simp` fails to apply `PartialEquiv.prod_symm` with `ModelProd`
congr
exact ((chartAt H (TotalSpace.proj p)).right_inv h).symm
#align tangent_map_chart_symm tangentMap_chart_symm
lemma mfderiv_chartAt_eq_tangentCoordChange {x y : M} (hsrc : x ∈ (chartAt H y).source) :
mfderiv I I (chartAt H y) x = tangentCoordChange I x y x := by
have := mdifferentiableAt_atlas I (ChartedSpace.chart_mem_atlas _) hsrc
simp [mfderiv, if_pos this, Function.comp.assoc]
end Charts
/-! ### Differentiable partial homeomorphisms -/
namespace PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable
variable {I I' I''}
variable {e : PartialHomeomorph M M'} (he : e.MDifferentiable I I') {e' : PartialHomeomorph M' M''}
nonrec theorem symm : e.symm.MDifferentiable I' I := he.symm
#align local_homeomorph.mdifferentiable.symm PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.symm
protected theorem mdifferentiableAt {x : M} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : MDifferentiableAt I I' e x :=
(he.1 x hx).mdifferentiableAt (e.open_source.mem_nhds hx)
#align local_homeomorph.mdifferentiable.mdifferentiable_at PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_symm {x : M'} (hx : x ∈ e.target) : MDifferentiableAt I' I e.symm x :=
(he.2 x hx).mdifferentiableAt (e.open_target.mem_nhds hx)
#align local_homeomorph.mdifferentiable.mdifferentiable_at_symm PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableAt_symm
variable [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I' M']
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I'' M'']
theorem symm_comp_deriv {x : M} (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
(mfderiv I' I e.symm (e x)).comp (mfderiv I I' e x) =
ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x) := by
have : mfderiv I I (e.symm ∘ e) x = (mfderiv I' I e.symm (e x)).comp (mfderiv I I' e x) :=
mfderiv_comp x (he.mdifferentiableAt_symm (e.map_source hx)) (he.mdifferentiableAt hx)
rw [← this]
have : mfderiv I I (_root_.id : M → M) x = ContinuousLinearMap.id _ _ := mfderiv_id I
rw [← this]
apply Filter.EventuallyEq.mfderiv_eq
have : e.source ∈ 𝓝 x := e.open_source.mem_nhds hx
exact Filter.mem_of_superset this (by mfld_set_tac)
#align local_homeomorph.mdifferentiable.symm_comp_deriv PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.symm_comp_deriv
theorem comp_symm_deriv {x : M'} (hx : x ∈ e.target) :
(mfderiv I I' e (e.symm x)).comp (mfderiv I' I e.symm x) =
ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (TangentSpace I' x) :=
he.symm.symm_comp_deriv hx
#align local_homeomorph.mdifferentiable.comp_symm_deriv PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.comp_symm_deriv
/-- The derivative of a differentiable partial homeomorphism, as a continuous linear equivalence
between the tangent spaces at `x` and `e x`. -/
protected def mfderiv {x : M} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : TangentSpace I x ≃L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' (e x) :=
{ mfderiv I I' e x with
invFun := mfderiv I' I e.symm (e x)
continuous_toFun := (mfderiv I I' e x).cont
continuous_invFun := (mfderiv I' I e.symm (e x)).cont
left_inv := fun y => by
have : (ContinuousLinearMap.id _ _ : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I x) y = y := rfl
conv_rhs => rw [← this, ← he.symm_comp_deriv hx]
rfl
right_inv := fun y => by
have :
(ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 _ : TangentSpace I' (e x) →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' (e x)) y = y :=
rfl
conv_rhs => rw [← this, ← he.comp_symm_deriv (e.map_source hx)]
rw [e.left_inv hx]
rfl }
#align local_homeomorph.mdifferentiable.mfderiv PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.mfderiv
theorem mfderiv_bijective {x : M} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : Function.Bijective (mfderiv I I' e x) :=
(he.mfderiv hx).bijective
#align local_homeomorph.mdifferentiable.mfderiv_bijective PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.mfderiv_bijective
theorem mfderiv_injective {x : M} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : Function.Injective (mfderiv I I' e x) :=
(he.mfderiv hx).injective
#align local_homeomorph.mdifferentiable.mfderiv_injective PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.mfderiv_injective
theorem mfderiv_surjective {x : M} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : Function.Surjective (mfderiv I I' e x) :=
(he.mfderiv hx).surjective
#align local_homeomorph.mdifferentiable.mfderiv_surjective PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.mfderiv_surjective
theorem ker_mfderiv_eq_bot {x : M} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : LinearMap.ker (mfderiv I I' e x) = ⊥ :=
(he.mfderiv hx).toLinearEquiv.ker
#align local_homeomorph.mdifferentiable.ker_mfderiv_eq_bot PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.ker_mfderiv_eq_bot
theorem range_mfderiv_eq_top {x : M} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : LinearMap.range (mfderiv I I' e x) = ⊤ :=
(he.mfderiv hx).toLinearEquiv.range
#align local_homeomorph.mdifferentiable.range_mfderiv_eq_top PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.range_mfderiv_eq_top
theorem range_mfderiv_eq_univ {x : M} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : range (mfderiv I I' e x) = univ :=
(he.mfderiv_surjective hx).range_eq
#align local_homeomorph.mdifferentiable.range_mfderiv_eq_univ PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.range_mfderiv_eq_univ
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/Atlas.lean | 263 | 273 | theorem trans (he' : e'.MDifferentiable I' I'') : (e.trans e').MDifferentiable I I'' := by |
constructor
· intro x hx
simp only [mfld_simps] at hx
exact
((he'.mdifferentiableAt hx.2).comp _ (he.mdifferentiableAt hx.1)).mdifferentiableWithinAt
· intro x hx
simp only [mfld_simps] at hx
exact
((he.symm.mdifferentiableAt hx.2).comp _
(he'.symm.mdifferentiableAt hx.1)).mdifferentiableWithinAt
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.Rat.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.SeqFocus
/-! # Additional lemmas about the Rational Numbers -/
namespace Rat
theorem ext : {p q : Rat} → p.num = q.num → p.den = q.den → p = q
| ⟨_,_,_,_⟩, ⟨_,_,_,_⟩, rfl, rfl => rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_den_one {r : Int} :
⟨r, 1, Nat.one_ne_zero, (Nat.coprime_one_right _)⟩ = (r : Rat) := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_num : (0 : Rat).num = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_den : (0 : Rat).den = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem one_num : (1 : Rat).num = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem one_den : (1 : Rat).den = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem maybeNormalize_eq {num den g} (den_nz reduced) :
maybeNormalize num den g den_nz reduced =
{ num := num.div g, den := den / g, den_nz, reduced } := by
unfold maybeNormalize; split
· subst g; simp
· rfl
theorem normalize.reduced' {num : Int} {den g : Nat} (den_nz : den ≠ 0)
(e : g = num.natAbs.gcd den) : (num / g).natAbs.Coprime (den / g) := by
rw [← Int.div_eq_ediv_of_dvd (e ▸ Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..))]
exact normalize.reduced den_nz e
theorem normalize_eq {num den} (den_nz) : normalize num den den_nz =
{ num := num / num.natAbs.gcd den
den := den / num.natAbs.gcd den
den_nz := normalize.den_nz den_nz rfl
reduced := normalize.reduced' den_nz rfl } := by
simp only [normalize, maybeNormalize_eq,
Int.div_eq_ediv_of_dvd (Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..))]
@[simp] theorem normalize_zero (nz) : normalize 0 d nz = 0 := by
simp [normalize, Int.zero_div, Int.natAbs_zero, Nat.div_self (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero nz)]; rfl
theorem mk_eq_normalize (num den nz c) : ⟨num, den, nz, c⟩ = normalize num den nz := by
simp [normalize_eq, c.gcd_eq_one]
theorem normalize_self (r : Rat) : normalize r.num r.den r.den_nz = r := (mk_eq_normalize ..).symm
theorem normalize_mul_left {a : Nat} (d0 : d ≠ 0) (a0 : a ≠ 0) :
normalize (↑a * n) (a * d) (Nat.mul_ne_zero a0 d0) = normalize n d d0 := by
simp [normalize_eq, mk'.injEq, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
Nat.mul_div_mul_left _ _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero a0), Int.ofNat_mul,
Int.mul_ediv_mul_of_pos _ _ (Int.ofNat_pos.2 <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero a0)]
theorem normalize_mul_right {a : Nat} (d0 : d ≠ 0) (a0 : a ≠ 0) :
normalize (n * a) (d * a) (Nat.mul_ne_zero d0 a0) = normalize n d d0 := by
rw [← normalize_mul_left (d0 := d0) a0]; congr 1 <;> [apply Int.mul_comm; apply Nat.mul_comm]
theorem normalize_eq_iff (z₁ : d₁ ≠ 0) (z₂ : d₂ ≠ 0) :
normalize n₁ d₁ z₁ = normalize n₂ d₂ z₂ ↔ n₁ * d₂ = n₂ * d₁ := by
constructor <;> intro h
· simp only [normalize_eq, mk'.injEq] at h
have' hn₁ := Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_left n₁.natAbs d₁
have' hn₂ := Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_left n₂.natAbs d₂
have' hd₁ := Int.ofNat_dvd.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_right n₁.natAbs d₁
have' hd₂ := Int.ofNat_dvd.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_right n₂.natAbs d₂
rw [← Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.dvd_trans hd₂ (Int.dvd_mul_left ..)),
Int.mul_ediv_assoc _ hd₂, ← Int.ofNat_ediv, ← h.2, Int.ofNat_ediv,
← Int.mul_ediv_assoc _ hd₁, Int.mul_ediv_assoc' _ hn₁,
Int.mul_right_comm, h.1, Int.ediv_mul_cancel hn₂]
· rw [← normalize_mul_right _ z₂, ← normalize_mul_left z₂ z₁, Int.mul_comm d₁, h]
theorem maybeNormalize_eq_normalize {num : Int} {den g : Nat} (den_nz reduced)
(hn : ↑g ∣ num) (hd : g ∣ den) :
maybeNormalize num den g den_nz reduced = normalize num den (mt (by simp [·]) den_nz) := by
simp only [maybeNormalize_eq, mk_eq_normalize, Int.div_eq_ediv_of_dvd hn]
have : g ≠ 0 := mt (by simp [·]) den_nz
rw [← normalize_mul_right _ this, Int.ediv_mul_cancel hn]
congr 1; exact Nat.div_mul_cancel hd
@[simp] theorem normalize_eq_zero (d0 : d ≠ 0) : normalize n d d0 = 0 ↔ n = 0 := by
have' := normalize_eq_iff d0 Nat.one_ne_zero
rw [normalize_zero (d := 1)] at this; rw [this]; simp
theorem normalize_num_den' (num den nz) : ∃ d : Nat, d ≠ 0 ∧
num = (normalize num den nz).num * d ∧ den = (normalize num den nz).den * d := by
refine ⟨num.natAbs.gcd den, Nat.gcd_ne_zero_right nz, ?_⟩
simp [normalize_eq, Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..),
Nat.div_mul_cancel (Nat.gcd_dvd_right ..)]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/Rat/Lemmas.lean | 94 | 96 | theorem normalize_num_den (h : normalize n d z = ⟨n', d', z', c⟩) :
∃ m : Nat, m ≠ 0 ∧ n = n' * m ∧ d = d' * m := by |
have := normalize_num_den' n d z; rwa [h] at this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Extreme
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.OrderClosed
#align_import analysis.convex.exposed from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48024901a8e2a462363650c50d62248a77cbcab3"
/-!
# Exposed sets
This file defines exposed sets and exposed points for sets in a real vector space.
An exposed subset of `A` is a subset of `A` that is the set of all maximal points of a functional
(a continuous linear map `E → 𝕜`) over `A`. By convention, `∅` is an exposed subset of all sets.
This allows for better functoriality of the definition (the intersection of two exposed subsets is
exposed, faces of a polytope form a bounded lattice).
This is an analytic notion of "being on the side of". It is stronger than being extreme (see
`IsExposed.isExtreme`), but weaker (for exposed points) than being a vertex.
An exposed set of `A` is sometimes called a "face of `A`", but we decided to reserve this
terminology to the more specific notion of a face of a polytope (sometimes hopefully soon out
on mathlib!).
## Main declarations
* `IsExposed 𝕜 A B`: States that `B` is an exposed set of `A` (in the literature, `A` is often
implicit).
* `IsExposed.isExtreme`: An exposed set is also extreme.
## References
See chapter 8 of [Barry Simon, *Convexity*][simon2011]
## TODO
Define intrinsic frontier/interior and prove the lemmas related to exposed sets and points.
Generalise to Locally Convex Topological Vector Spaces™
More not-yet-PRed stuff is available on the branch `sperner_again`.
-/
open scoped Classical
open Affine
open Set
section PreorderSemiring
variable (𝕜 : Type*) {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [Semiring 𝕜] [Preorder 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E]
[TopologicalSpace E] [Module 𝕜 E] {A B : Set E}
/-- A set `B` is exposed with respect to `A` iff it maximizes some functional over `A` (and contains
all points maximizing it). Written `IsExposed 𝕜 A B`. -/
def IsExposed (A B : Set E) : Prop :=
B.Nonempty → ∃ l : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, B = { x ∈ A | ∀ y ∈ A, l y ≤ l x }
#align is_exposed IsExposed
end PreorderSemiring
section OrderedRing
variable {𝕜 : Type*} {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderedRing 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E]
[TopologicalSpace E] [Module 𝕜 E] {l : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {A B C : Set E} {X : Finset E} {x : E}
/-- A useful way to build exposed sets from intersecting `A` with halfspaces (modelled by an
inequality with a functional). -/
def ContinuousLinearMap.toExposed (l : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (A : Set E) : Set E :=
{ x ∈ A | ∀ y ∈ A, l y ≤ l x }
#align continuous_linear_map.to_exposed ContinuousLinearMap.toExposed
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.toExposed.isExposed : IsExposed 𝕜 A (l.toExposed A) := fun _ => ⟨l, rfl⟩
#align continuous_linear_map.to_exposed.is_exposed ContinuousLinearMap.toExposed.isExposed
theorem isExposed_empty : IsExposed 𝕜 A ∅ := fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => by
exfalso
exact hx
#align is_exposed_empty isExposed_empty
namespace IsExposed
protected theorem subset (hAB : IsExposed 𝕜 A B) : B ⊆ A := by
rintro x hx
obtain ⟨_, rfl⟩ := hAB ⟨x, hx⟩
exact hx.1
#align is_exposed.subset IsExposed.subset
@[refl]
protected theorem refl (A : Set E) : IsExposed 𝕜 A A := fun ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨0, Subset.antisymm (fun _ hx => ⟨hx, fun _ _ => le_refl 0⟩) fun _ hx => hx.1⟩
#align is_exposed.refl IsExposed.refl
protected theorem antisymm (hB : IsExposed 𝕜 A B) (hA : IsExposed 𝕜 B A) : A = B :=
hA.subset.antisymm hB.subset
#align is_exposed.antisymm IsExposed.antisymm
/-! `IsExposed` is *not* transitive: Consider a (topologically) open cube with vertices
`A₀₀₀, ..., A₁₁₁` and add to it the triangle `A₀₀₀A₀₀₁A₀₁₀`. Then `A₀₀₁A₀₁₀` is an exposed subset
of `A₀₀₀A₀₀₁A₀₁₀` which is an exposed subset of the cube, but `A₀₀₁A₀₁₀` is not itself an exposed
subset of the cube. -/
protected theorem mono (hC : IsExposed 𝕜 A C) (hBA : B ⊆ A) (hCB : C ⊆ B) : IsExposed 𝕜 B C := by
rintro ⟨w, hw⟩
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ := hC ⟨w, hw⟩
exact ⟨l, Subset.antisymm (fun x hx => ⟨hCB hx, fun y hy => hx.2 y (hBA hy)⟩) fun x hx =>
⟨hBA hx.1, fun y hy => (hw.2 y hy).trans (hx.2 w (hCB hw))⟩⟩
#align is_exposed.mono IsExposed.mono
/-- If `B` is a nonempty exposed subset of `A`, then `B` is the intersection of `A` with some closed
halfspace. The converse is *not* true. It would require that the corresponding open halfspace
doesn't intersect `A`. -/
theorem eq_inter_halfspace' {A B : Set E} (hAB : IsExposed 𝕜 A B) (hB : B.Nonempty) :
∃ l : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ∃ a, B = { x ∈ A | a ≤ l x } := by
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ := hAB hB
obtain ⟨w, hw⟩ := hB
exact ⟨l, l w, Subset.antisymm (fun x hx => ⟨hx.1, hx.2 w hw.1⟩) fun x hx =>
⟨hx.1, fun y hy => (hw.2 y hy).trans hx.2⟩⟩
#align is_exposed.eq_inter_halfspace' IsExposed.eq_inter_halfspace'
/-- For nontrivial `𝕜`, if `B` is an exposed subset of `A`, then `B` is the intersection of `A` with
some closed halfspace. The converse is *not* true. It would require that the corresponding open
halfspace doesn't intersect `A`. -/
theorem eq_inter_halfspace [Nontrivial 𝕜] {A B : Set E} (hAB : IsExposed 𝕜 A B) :
∃ l : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ∃ a, B = { x ∈ A | a ≤ l x } := by
obtain rfl | hB := B.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· refine ⟨0, 1, ?_⟩
rw [eq_comm, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
rintro x ⟨-, h⟩
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply] at h
have : ¬(1 : 𝕜) ≤ 0 := not_le_of_lt zero_lt_one
contradiction
exact hAB.eq_inter_halfspace' hB
#align is_exposed.eq_inter_halfspace IsExposed.eq_inter_halfspace
protected theorem inter [ContinuousAdd 𝕜] {A B C : Set E} (hB : IsExposed 𝕜 A B)
(hC : IsExposed 𝕜 A C) : IsExposed 𝕜 A (B ∩ C) := by
rintro ⟨w, hwB, hwC⟩
obtain ⟨l₁, rfl⟩ := hB ⟨w, hwB⟩
obtain ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ := hC ⟨w, hwC⟩
refine ⟨l₁ + l₂, Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· rintro x ⟨⟨hxA, hxB⟩, ⟨-, hxC⟩⟩
exact ⟨hxA, fun z hz => add_le_add (hxB z hz) (hxC z hz)⟩
rintro x ⟨hxA, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨hxA, fun y hy => ?_⟩, hxA, fun y hy => ?_⟩
· exact
(add_le_add_iff_right (l₂ x)).1 ((add_le_add (hwB.2 y hy) (hwC.2 x hxA)).trans (hx w hwB.1))
· exact
(add_le_add_iff_left (l₁ x)).1 (le_trans (add_le_add (hwB.2 x hxA) (hwC.2 y hy)) (hx w hwB.1))
#align is_exposed.inter IsExposed.inter
theorem sInter [ContinuousAdd 𝕜] {F : Finset (Set E)} (hF : F.Nonempty)
(hAF : ∀ B ∈ F, IsExposed 𝕜 A B) : IsExposed 𝕜 A (⋂₀ F) := by
induction F using Finset.induction with
| empty => exfalso; exact Finset.not_nonempty_empty hF
| @insert C F _ hF' =>
rw [Finset.coe_insert, sInter_insert]
obtain rfl | hFnemp := F.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· rw [Finset.coe_empty, sInter_empty, inter_univ]
exact hAF C (Finset.mem_singleton_self C)
· exact (hAF C (Finset.mem_insert_self C F)).inter
(hF' hFnemp fun B hB => hAF B (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hB))
#align is_exposed.sInter IsExposed.sInter
theorem inter_left (hC : IsExposed 𝕜 A C) (hCB : C ⊆ B) : IsExposed 𝕜 (A ∩ B) C := by
rintro ⟨w, hw⟩
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ := hC ⟨w, hw⟩
exact ⟨l, Subset.antisymm (fun x hx => ⟨⟨hx.1, hCB hx⟩, fun y hy => hx.2 y hy.1⟩)
fun x ⟨⟨hxC, _⟩, hx⟩ => ⟨hxC, fun y hy => (hw.2 y hy).trans (hx w ⟨hC.subset hw, hCB hw⟩)⟩⟩
#align is_exposed.inter_left IsExposed.inter_left
theorem inter_right (hC : IsExposed 𝕜 B C) (hCA : C ⊆ A) : IsExposed 𝕜 (A ∩ B) C := by
rw [inter_comm]
exact hC.inter_left hCA
#align is_exposed.inter_right IsExposed.inter_right
protected theorem isClosed [OrderClosedTopology 𝕜] {A B : Set E} (hAB : IsExposed 𝕜 A B)
(hA : IsClosed A) : IsClosed B := by
obtain rfl | hB := B.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
obtain ⟨l, a, rfl⟩ := hAB.eq_inter_halfspace' hB
exact hA.isClosed_le continuousOn_const l.continuous.continuousOn
#align is_exposed.is_closed IsExposed.isClosed
protected theorem isCompact [OrderClosedTopology 𝕜] [T2Space E] {A B : Set E}
(hAB : IsExposed 𝕜 A B) (hA : IsCompact A) : IsCompact B :=
hA.of_isClosed_subset (hAB.isClosed hA.isClosed) hAB.subset
#align is_exposed.is_compact IsExposed.isCompact
end IsExposed
variable (𝕜)
/-- A point is exposed with respect to `A` iff there exists a hyperplane whose intersection with
`A` is exactly that point. -/
def Set.exposedPoints (A : Set E) : Set E :=
{ x ∈ A | ∃ l : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ∀ y ∈ A, l y ≤ l x ∧ (l x ≤ l y → y = x) }
#align set.exposed_points Set.exposedPoints
variable {𝕜}
theorem exposed_point_def :
x ∈ A.exposedPoints 𝕜 ↔ x ∈ A ∧ ∃ l : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ∀ y ∈ A, l y ≤ l x ∧ (l x ≤ l y → y = x) :=
Iff.rfl
#align exposed_point_def exposed_point_def
theorem exposedPoints_subset : A.exposedPoints 𝕜 ⊆ A := fun _ hx => hx.1
#align exposed_points_subset exposedPoints_subset
@[simp]
theorem exposedPoints_empty : (∅ : Set E).exposedPoints 𝕜 = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 exposedPoints_subset
#align exposed_points_empty exposedPoints_empty
/-- Exposed points exactly correspond to exposed singletons. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Exposed.lean | 220 | 231 | theorem mem_exposedPoints_iff_exposed_singleton : x ∈ A.exposedPoints 𝕜 ↔ IsExposed 𝕜 A {x} := by |
use fun ⟨hxA, l, hl⟩ _ =>
⟨l,
Eq.symm <|
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2
⟨⟨hxA, fun y hy => (hl y hy).1⟩, fun z hz => (hl z hz.1).2 (hz.2 x hxA)⟩⟩
rintro h
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := h ⟨x, mem_singleton _⟩
rw [eq_comm, eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem] at hl
exact
⟨hl.1.1, l, fun y hy =>
⟨hl.1.2 y hy, fun hxy => hl.2 y ⟨hy, fun z hz => (hl.1.2 z hz).trans hxy⟩⟩⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jan-David Salchow, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.MulAction
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.UniformGroup
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Projection
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
#align_import topology.algebra.module.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6285167a053ad0990fc88e56c48ccd9fae6550eb"
/-!
# Theory of topological modules and continuous linear maps.
We use the class `ContinuousSMul` for topological (semi) modules and topological vector spaces.
In this file we define continuous (semi-)linear maps, as semilinear maps between topological
modules which are continuous. The set of continuous semilinear maps between the topological
`R₁`-module `M` and `R₂`-module `M₂` with respect to the `RingHom` `σ` is denoted by `M →SL[σ] M₂`.
Plain linear maps are denoted by `M →L[R] M₂` and star-linear maps by `M →L⋆[R] M₂`.
The corresponding notation for equivalences is `M ≃SL[σ] M₂`, `M ≃L[R] M₂` and `M ≃L⋆[R] M₂`.
-/
open LinearMap (ker range)
open Topology Filter Pointwise
universe u v w u'
section
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Ring R] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalSpace M]
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/Basic.lean | 42 | 48 | theorem ContinuousSMul.of_nhds_zero [TopologicalRing R] [TopologicalAddGroup M]
(hmul : Tendsto (fun p : R × M => p.1 • p.2) (𝓝 0 ×ˢ 𝓝 0) (𝓝 0))
(hmulleft : ∀ m : M, Tendsto (fun a : R => a • m) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0))
(hmulright : ∀ a : R, Tendsto (fun m : M => a • m) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0)) : ContinuousSMul R M where
continuous_smul := by |
refine continuous_of_continuousAt_zero₂ (AddMonoidHom.smul : R →+ M →+ M) ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simpa [ContinuousAt, nhds_prod_eq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Over
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Prod
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.MinimalPrime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Away.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Closeds
import Mathlib.Topology.Sober
#align_import algebraic_geometry.prime_spectrum.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7c017d750512a352b623b1824d75da5998457d0"
/-!
# Prime spectrum of a commutative (semi)ring
The prime spectrum of a commutative (semi)ring is the type of all prime ideals.
It is naturally endowed with a topology: the Zariski topology.
(It is also naturally endowed with a sheaf of rings,
which is constructed in `AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf`.)
## Main definitions
* `PrimeSpectrum R`: The prime spectrum of a commutative (semi)ring `R`,
i.e., the set of all prime ideals of `R`.
* `zeroLocus s`: The zero locus of a subset `s` of `R`
is the subset of `PrimeSpectrum R` consisting of all prime ideals that contain `s`.
* `vanishingIdeal t`: The vanishing ideal of a subset `t` of `PrimeSpectrum R`
is the intersection of points in `t` (viewed as prime ideals).
## Conventions
We denote subsets of (semi)rings with `s`, `s'`, etc...
whereas we denote subsets of prime spectra with `t`, `t'`, etc...
## Inspiration/contributors
The contents of this file draw inspiration from <https://github.com/ramonfmir/lean-scheme>
which has contributions from Ramon Fernandez Mir, Kevin Buzzard, Kenny Lau,
and Chris Hughes (on an earlier repository).
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
universe u v
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v)
/-- The prime spectrum of a commutative (semi)ring `R` is the type of all prime ideals of `R`.
It is naturally endowed with a topology (the Zariski topology),
and a sheaf of commutative rings (see `AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf`).
It is a fundamental building block in algebraic geometry. -/
@[ext]
structure PrimeSpectrum [CommSemiring R] where
asIdeal : Ideal R
IsPrime : asIdeal.IsPrime
#align prime_spectrum PrimeSpectrum
attribute [instance] PrimeSpectrum.IsPrime
namespace PrimeSpectrum
section CommSemiRing
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
variable {R S}
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nonempty <| PrimeSpectrum R :=
let ⟨I, hI⟩ := Ideal.exists_maximal R
⟨⟨I, hI.isPrime⟩⟩
/-- The prime spectrum of the zero ring is empty. -/
instance [Subsingleton R] : IsEmpty (PrimeSpectrum R) :=
⟨fun x ↦ x.IsPrime.ne_top <| SetLike.ext' <| Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty x.asIdeal.nonempty⟩
#noalign prime_spectrum.punit
variable (R S)
/-- The map from the direct sum of prime spectra to the prime spectrum of a direct product. -/
@[simp]
def primeSpectrumProdOfSum : Sum (PrimeSpectrum R) (PrimeSpectrum S) → PrimeSpectrum (R × S)
| Sum.inl ⟨I, _⟩ => ⟨Ideal.prod I ⊤, Ideal.isPrime_ideal_prod_top⟩
| Sum.inr ⟨J, _⟩ => ⟨Ideal.prod ⊤ J, Ideal.isPrime_ideal_prod_top'⟩
#align prime_spectrum.prime_spectrum_prod_of_sum PrimeSpectrum.primeSpectrumProdOfSum
/-- The prime spectrum of `R × S` is in bijection with the disjoint unions of the prime spectrum of
`R` and the prime spectrum of `S`. -/
noncomputable def primeSpectrumProd :
PrimeSpectrum (R × S) ≃ Sum (PrimeSpectrum R) (PrimeSpectrum S) :=
Equiv.symm <|
Equiv.ofBijective (primeSpectrumProdOfSum R S) (by
constructor
· rintro (⟨I, hI⟩ | ⟨J, hJ⟩) (⟨I', hI'⟩ | ⟨J', hJ'⟩) h <;>
simp only [mk.injEq, Ideal.prod.ext_iff, primeSpectrumProdOfSum] at h
· simp only [h]
· exact False.elim (hI.ne_top h.left)
· exact False.elim (hJ.ne_top h.right)
· simp only [h]
· rintro ⟨I, hI⟩
rcases (Ideal.ideal_prod_prime I).mp hI with (⟨p, ⟨hp, rfl⟩⟩ | ⟨p, ⟨hp, rfl⟩⟩)
· exact ⟨Sum.inl ⟨p, hp⟩, rfl⟩
· exact ⟨Sum.inr ⟨p, hp⟩, rfl⟩)
#align prime_spectrum.prime_spectrum_prod PrimeSpectrum.primeSpectrumProd
variable {R S}
@[simp]
theorem primeSpectrumProd_symm_inl_asIdeal (x : PrimeSpectrum R) :
((primeSpectrumProd R S).symm <| Sum.inl x).asIdeal = Ideal.prod x.asIdeal ⊤ := by
cases x
rfl
#align prime_spectrum.prime_spectrum_prod_symm_inl_as_ideal PrimeSpectrum.primeSpectrumProd_symm_inl_asIdeal
@[simp]
theorem primeSpectrumProd_symm_inr_asIdeal (x : PrimeSpectrum S) :
((primeSpectrumProd R S).symm <| Sum.inr x).asIdeal = Ideal.prod ⊤ x.asIdeal := by
cases x
rfl
#align prime_spectrum.prime_spectrum_prod_symm_inr_as_ideal PrimeSpectrum.primeSpectrumProd_symm_inr_asIdeal
/-- The zero locus of a set `s` of elements of a commutative (semi)ring `R` is the set of all
prime ideals of the ring that contain the set `s`.
An element `f` of `R` can be thought of as a dependent function on the prime spectrum of `R`.
At a point `x` (a prime ideal) the function (i.e., element) `f` takes values in the quotient ring
`R` modulo the prime ideal `x`. In this manner, `zeroLocus s` is exactly the subset of
`PrimeSpectrum R` where all "functions" in `s` vanish simultaneously.
-/
def zeroLocus (s : Set R) : Set (PrimeSpectrum R) :=
{ x | s ⊆ x.asIdeal }
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus
@[simp]
theorem mem_zeroLocus (x : PrimeSpectrum R) (s : Set R) : x ∈ zeroLocus s ↔ s ⊆ x.asIdeal :=
Iff.rfl
#align prime_spectrum.mem_zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.mem_zeroLocus
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_span (s : Set R) : zeroLocus (Ideal.span s : Set R) = zeroLocus s := by
ext x
exact (Submodule.gi R R).gc s x.asIdeal
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_span PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_span
/-- The vanishing ideal of a set `t` of points of the prime spectrum of a commutative ring `R` is
the intersection of all the prime ideals in the set `t`.
An element `f` of `R` can be thought of as a dependent function on the prime spectrum of `R`.
At a point `x` (a prime ideal) the function (i.e., element) `f` takes values in the quotient ring
`R` modulo the prime ideal `x`. In this manner, `vanishingIdeal t` is exactly the ideal of `R`
consisting of all "functions" that vanish on all of `t`.
-/
def vanishingIdeal (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) : Ideal R :=
⨅ (x : PrimeSpectrum R) (_ : x ∈ t), x.asIdeal
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal
theorem coe_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
(vanishingIdeal t : Set R) = { f : R | ∀ x : PrimeSpectrum R, x ∈ t → f ∈ x.asIdeal } := by
ext f
rw [vanishingIdeal, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.mem_iInf]
apply forall_congr'; intro x
rw [Submodule.mem_iInf]
#align prime_spectrum.coe_vanishing_ideal PrimeSpectrum.coe_vanishingIdeal
theorem mem_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) (f : R) :
f ∈ vanishingIdeal t ↔ ∀ x : PrimeSpectrum R, x ∈ t → f ∈ x.asIdeal := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_vanishingIdeal, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
#align prime_spectrum.mem_vanishing_ideal PrimeSpectrum.mem_vanishingIdeal
@[simp]
theorem vanishingIdeal_singleton (x : PrimeSpectrum R) :
vanishingIdeal ({x} : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) = x.asIdeal := by simp [vanishingIdeal]
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_singleton PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_singleton
theorem subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) (I : Ideal R) :
t ⊆ zeroLocus I ↔ I ≤ vanishingIdeal t :=
⟨fun h _ k => (mem_vanishingIdeal _ _).mpr fun _ j => (mem_zeroLocus _ _).mpr (h j) k, fun h =>
fun x j => (mem_zeroLocus _ _).mpr (le_trans h fun _ h => ((mem_vanishingIdeal _ _).mp h) x j)⟩
#align prime_spectrum.subset_zero_locus_iff_le_vanishing_ideal PrimeSpectrum.subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal
section Gc
variable (R)
/-- `zeroLocus` and `vanishingIdeal` form a galois connection. -/
theorem gc :
@GaloisConnection (Ideal R) (Set (PrimeSpectrum R))ᵒᵈ _ _ (fun I => zeroLocus I) fun t =>
vanishingIdeal t :=
fun I t => subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal t I
#align prime_spectrum.gc PrimeSpectrum.gc
/-- `zeroLocus` and `vanishingIdeal` form a galois connection. -/
theorem gc_set :
@GaloisConnection (Set R) (Set (PrimeSpectrum R))ᵒᵈ _ _ (fun s => zeroLocus s) fun t =>
vanishingIdeal t := by
have ideal_gc : GaloisConnection Ideal.span _ := (Submodule.gi R R).gc
simpa [zeroLocus_span, Function.comp] using ideal_gc.compose (gc R)
#align prime_spectrum.gc_set PrimeSpectrum.gc_set
theorem subset_zeroLocus_iff_subset_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) (s : Set R) :
t ⊆ zeroLocus s ↔ s ⊆ vanishingIdeal t :=
(gc_set R) s t
#align prime_spectrum.subset_zero_locus_iff_subset_vanishing_ideal PrimeSpectrum.subset_zeroLocus_iff_subset_vanishingIdeal
end Gc
theorem subset_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus (s : Set R) : s ⊆ vanishingIdeal (zeroLocus s) :=
(gc_set R).le_u_l s
#align prime_spectrum.subset_vanishing_ideal_zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.subset_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus
theorem le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus (I : Ideal R) : I ≤ vanishingIdeal (zeroLocus I) :=
(gc R).le_u_l I
#align prime_spectrum.le_vanishing_ideal_zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus
@[simp]
theorem vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical (I : Ideal R) :
vanishingIdeal (zeroLocus (I : Set R)) = I.radical :=
Ideal.ext fun f => by
rw [mem_vanishingIdeal, Ideal.radical_eq_sInf, Submodule.mem_sInf]
exact ⟨fun h x hx => h ⟨x, hx.2⟩ hx.1, fun h x hx => h x.1 ⟨hx, x.2⟩⟩
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_zero_locus_eq_radical PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_radical (I : Ideal R) : zeroLocus (I.radical : Set R) = zeroLocus I :=
vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical I ▸ (gc R).l_u_l_eq_l I
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_radical PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_radical
theorem subset_zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
t ⊆ zeroLocus (vanishingIdeal t) :=
(gc R).l_u_le t
#align prime_spectrum.subset_zero_locus_vanishing_ideal PrimeSpectrum.subset_zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal
theorem zeroLocus_anti_mono {s t : Set R} (h : s ⊆ t) : zeroLocus t ⊆ zeroLocus s :=
(gc_set R).monotone_l h
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_anti_mono PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_anti_mono
theorem zeroLocus_anti_mono_ideal {s t : Ideal R} (h : s ≤ t) :
zeroLocus (t : Set R) ⊆ zeroLocus (s : Set R) :=
(gc R).monotone_l h
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_anti_mono_ideal PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_anti_mono_ideal
theorem vanishingIdeal_anti_mono {s t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)} (h : s ⊆ t) :
vanishingIdeal t ≤ vanishingIdeal s :=
(gc R).monotone_u h
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_anti_mono PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_anti_mono
theorem zeroLocus_subset_zeroLocus_iff (I J : Ideal R) :
zeroLocus (I : Set R) ⊆ zeroLocus (J : Set R) ↔ J ≤ I.radical := by
rw [subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal, vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical]
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_subset_zero_locus_iff PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_subset_zeroLocus_iff
theorem zeroLocus_subset_zeroLocus_singleton_iff (f g : R) :
zeroLocus ({f} : Set R) ⊆ zeroLocus {g} ↔ g ∈ (Ideal.span ({f} : Set R)).radical := by
rw [← zeroLocus_span {f}, ← zeroLocus_span {g}, zeroLocus_subset_zeroLocus_iff, Ideal.span_le,
Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_subset_zero_locus_singleton_iff PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_subset_zeroLocus_singleton_iff
theorem zeroLocus_bot : zeroLocus ((⊥ : Ideal R) : Set R) = Set.univ :=
(gc R).l_bot
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_bot PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_bot
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_singleton_zero : zeroLocus ({0} : Set R) = Set.univ :=
zeroLocus_bot
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_singleton_zero PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_singleton_zero
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_empty : zeroLocus (∅ : Set R) = Set.univ :=
(gc_set R).l_bot
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_empty PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_empty
@[simp]
theorem vanishingIdeal_univ : vanishingIdeal (∅ : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) = ⊤ := by
simpa using (gc R).u_top
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_univ PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_univ
theorem zeroLocus_empty_of_one_mem {s : Set R} (h : (1 : R) ∈ s) : zeroLocus s = ∅ := by
rw [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
intro x hx
rw [mem_zeroLocus] at hx
have x_prime : x.asIdeal.IsPrime := by infer_instance
have eq_top : x.asIdeal = ⊤ := by
rw [Ideal.eq_top_iff_one]
exact hx h
apply x_prime.ne_top eq_top
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_empty_of_one_mem PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_empty_of_one_mem
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_singleton_one : zeroLocus ({1} : Set R) = ∅ :=
zeroLocus_empty_of_one_mem (Set.mem_singleton (1 : R))
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_singleton_one PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_singleton_one
theorem zeroLocus_empty_iff_eq_top {I : Ideal R} : zeroLocus (I : Set R) = ∅ ↔ I = ⊤ := by
constructor
· contrapose!
intro h
rcases Ideal.exists_le_maximal I h with ⟨M, hM, hIM⟩
exact ⟨⟨M, hM.isPrime⟩, hIM⟩
· rintro rfl
apply zeroLocus_empty_of_one_mem
trivial
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_empty_iff_eq_top PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_empty_iff_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_univ : zeroLocus (Set.univ : Set R) = ∅ :=
zeroLocus_empty_of_one_mem (Set.mem_univ 1)
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_univ PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_univ
theorem vanishingIdeal_eq_top_iff {s : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)} : vanishingIdeal s = ⊤ ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← top_le_iff, ← subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal, Submodule.top_coe, zeroLocus_univ,
Set.subset_empty_iff]
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_eq_top_iff PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_eq_top_iff
theorem zeroLocus_sup (I J : Ideal R) :
zeroLocus ((I ⊔ J : Ideal R) : Set R) = zeroLocus I ∩ zeroLocus J :=
(gc R).l_sup
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_sup PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_sup
theorem zeroLocus_union (s s' : Set R) : zeroLocus (s ∪ s') = zeroLocus s ∩ zeroLocus s' :=
(gc_set R).l_sup
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_union PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_union
theorem vanishingIdeal_union (t t' : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
vanishingIdeal (t ∪ t') = vanishingIdeal t ⊓ vanishingIdeal t' :=
(gc R).u_inf
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_union PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_union
theorem zeroLocus_iSup {ι : Sort*} (I : ι → Ideal R) :
zeroLocus ((⨆ i, I i : Ideal R) : Set R) = ⋂ i, zeroLocus (I i) :=
(gc R).l_iSup
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_supr PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_iSup
theorem zeroLocus_iUnion {ι : Sort*} (s : ι → Set R) :
zeroLocus (⋃ i, s i) = ⋂ i, zeroLocus (s i) :=
(gc_set R).l_iSup
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_Union PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_iUnion
theorem zeroLocus_bUnion (s : Set (Set R)) :
zeroLocus (⋃ s' ∈ s, s' : Set R) = ⋂ s' ∈ s, zeroLocus s' := by simp only [zeroLocus_iUnion]
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_bUnion PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_bUnion
theorem vanishingIdeal_iUnion {ι : Sort*} (t : ι → Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
vanishingIdeal (⋃ i, t i) = ⨅ i, vanishingIdeal (t i) :=
(gc R).u_iInf
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_Union PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_iUnion
theorem zeroLocus_inf (I J : Ideal R) :
zeroLocus ((I ⊓ J : Ideal R) : Set R) = zeroLocus I ∪ zeroLocus J :=
Set.ext fun x => x.2.inf_le
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_inf PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_inf
theorem union_zeroLocus (s s' : Set R) :
zeroLocus s ∪ zeroLocus s' = zeroLocus (Ideal.span s ⊓ Ideal.span s' : Ideal R) := by
rw [zeroLocus_inf]
simp
#align prime_spectrum.union_zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.union_zeroLocus
theorem zeroLocus_mul (I J : Ideal R) :
zeroLocus ((I * J : Ideal R) : Set R) = zeroLocus I ∪ zeroLocus J :=
Set.ext fun x => x.2.mul_le
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_mul PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_mul
theorem zeroLocus_singleton_mul (f g : R) :
zeroLocus ({f * g} : Set R) = zeroLocus {f} ∪ zeroLocus {g} :=
Set.ext fun x => by simpa using x.2.mul_mem_iff_mem_or_mem
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_singleton_mul PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_singleton_mul
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_pow (I : Ideal R) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
zeroLocus ((I ^ n : Ideal R) : Set R) = zeroLocus I :=
zeroLocus_radical (I ^ n) ▸ (I.radical_pow hn).symm ▸ zeroLocus_radical I
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_pow PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_pow
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_singleton_pow (f : R) (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
zeroLocus ({f ^ n} : Set R) = zeroLocus {f} :=
Set.ext fun x => by simpa using x.2.pow_mem_iff_mem n hn
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_singleton_pow PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_singleton_pow
theorem sup_vanishingIdeal_le (t t' : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
vanishingIdeal t ⊔ vanishingIdeal t' ≤ vanishingIdeal (t ∩ t') := by
intro r
rw [Submodule.mem_sup, mem_vanishingIdeal]
rintro ⟨f, hf, g, hg, rfl⟩ x ⟨hxt, hxt'⟩
rw [mem_vanishingIdeal] at hf hg
apply Submodule.add_mem <;> solve_by_elim
#align prime_spectrum.sup_vanishing_ideal_le PrimeSpectrum.sup_vanishingIdeal_le
theorem mem_compl_zeroLocus_iff_not_mem {f : R} {I : PrimeSpectrum R} :
I ∈ (zeroLocus {f} : Set (PrimeSpectrum R))ᶜ ↔ f ∉ I.asIdeal := by
rw [Set.mem_compl_iff, mem_zeroLocus, Set.singleton_subset_iff]; rfl
#align prime_spectrum.mem_compl_zero_locus_iff_not_mem PrimeSpectrum.mem_compl_zeroLocus_iff_not_mem
/-- The Zariski topology on the prime spectrum of a commutative (semi)ring is defined
via the closed sets of the topology: they are exactly those sets that are the zero locus
of a subset of the ring. -/
instance zariskiTopology : TopologicalSpace (PrimeSpectrum R) :=
TopologicalSpace.ofClosed (Set.range PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus) ⟨Set.univ, by simp⟩
(by
intro Zs h
rw [Set.sInter_eq_iInter]
choose f hf using fun i : Zs => h i.prop
simp only [← hf]
exact ⟨_, zeroLocus_iUnion _⟩)
(by
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, (union_zeroLocus s t).symm⟩)
#align prime_spectrum.zariski_topology PrimeSpectrum.zariskiTopology
theorem isOpen_iff (U : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) : IsOpen U ↔ ∃ s, Uᶜ = zeroLocus s := by
simp only [@eq_comm _ Uᶜ]; rfl
#align prime_spectrum.is_open_iff PrimeSpectrum.isOpen_iff
theorem isClosed_iff_zeroLocus (Z : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) : IsClosed Z ↔ ∃ s, Z = zeroLocus s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff, compl_compl]
#align prime_spectrum.is_closed_iff_zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.isClosed_iff_zeroLocus
theorem isClosed_iff_zeroLocus_ideal (Z : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
IsClosed Z ↔ ∃ I : Ideal R, Z = zeroLocus I :=
(isClosed_iff_zeroLocus _).trans
⟨fun ⟨s, hs⟩ => ⟨_, (zeroLocus_span s).substr hs⟩, fun ⟨I, hI⟩ => ⟨I, hI⟩⟩
#align prime_spectrum.is_closed_iff_zero_locus_ideal PrimeSpectrum.isClosed_iff_zeroLocus_ideal
theorem isClosed_iff_zeroLocus_radical_ideal (Z : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
IsClosed Z ↔ ∃ I : Ideal R, I.IsRadical ∧ Z = zeroLocus I :=
(isClosed_iff_zeroLocus_ideal _).trans
⟨fun ⟨I, hI⟩ => ⟨_, I.radical_isRadical, (zeroLocus_radical I).substr hI⟩, fun ⟨I, _, hI⟩ =>
⟨I, hI⟩⟩
#align prime_spectrum.is_closed_iff_zero_locus_radical_ideal PrimeSpectrum.isClosed_iff_zeroLocus_radical_ideal
theorem isClosed_zeroLocus (s : Set R) : IsClosed (zeroLocus s) := by
rw [isClosed_iff_zeroLocus]
exact ⟨s, rfl⟩
#align prime_spectrum.is_closed_zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.isClosed_zeroLocus
theorem zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
zeroLocus (vanishingIdeal t : Set R) = closure t := by
rcases isClosed_iff_zeroLocus (closure t) |>.mp isClosed_closure with ⟨I, hI⟩
rw [subset_antisymm_iff, (isClosed_zeroLocus _).closure_subset_iff, hI,
subset_zeroLocus_iff_subset_vanishingIdeal, (gc R).u_l_u_eq_u,
← subset_zeroLocus_iff_subset_vanishingIdeal, ← hI]
exact ⟨subset_closure, subset_zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal t⟩
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_vanishing_ideal_eq_closure PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure
theorem vanishingIdeal_closure (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
vanishingIdeal (closure t) = vanishingIdeal t :=
zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure t ▸ (gc R).u_l_u_eq_u t
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_closure PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_closure
theorem closure_singleton (x) : closure ({x} : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) = zeroLocus x.asIdeal := by
rw [← zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure, vanishingIdeal_singleton]
#align prime_spectrum.closure_singleton PrimeSpectrum.closure_singleton
theorem isClosed_singleton_iff_isMaximal (x : PrimeSpectrum R) :
IsClosed ({x} : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) ↔ x.asIdeal.IsMaximal := by
rw [← closure_subset_iff_isClosed, ← zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure,
vanishingIdeal_singleton]
constructor <;> intro H
· rcases x.asIdeal.exists_le_maximal x.2.1 with ⟨m, hm, hxm⟩
exact (congr_arg asIdeal (@H ⟨m, hm.isPrime⟩ hxm)) ▸ hm
· exact fun p hp ↦ PrimeSpectrum.ext _ _ (H.eq_of_le p.2.1 hp).symm
#align prime_spectrum.is_closed_singleton_iff_is_maximal PrimeSpectrum.isClosed_singleton_iff_isMaximal
theorem isRadical_vanishingIdeal (s : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) : (vanishingIdeal s).IsRadical := by
rw [← vanishingIdeal_closure, ← zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure,
vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical]
apply Ideal.radical_isRadical
#align prime_spectrum.is_radical_vanishing_ideal PrimeSpectrum.isRadical_vanishingIdeal
theorem vanishingIdeal_anti_mono_iff {s t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)} (ht : IsClosed t) :
s ⊆ t ↔ vanishingIdeal t ≤ vanishingIdeal s :=
⟨vanishingIdeal_anti_mono, fun h => by
rw [← ht.closure_subset_iff, ← ht.closure_eq]
convert ← zeroLocus_anti_mono_ideal h <;> apply zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure⟩
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_anti_mono_iff PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_anti_mono_iff
theorem vanishingIdeal_strict_anti_mono_iff {s t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)} (hs : IsClosed s)
(ht : IsClosed t) : s ⊂ t ↔ vanishingIdeal t < vanishingIdeal s := by
rw [Set.ssubset_def, vanishingIdeal_anti_mono_iff hs, vanishingIdeal_anti_mono_iff ht,
lt_iff_le_not_le]
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_strict_anti_mono_iff PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_strict_anti_mono_iff
/-- The antitone order embedding of closed subsets of `Spec R` into ideals of `R`. -/
def closedsEmbedding (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
(TopologicalSpace.Closeds <| PrimeSpectrum R)ᵒᵈ ↪o Ideal R :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff (fun s => vanishingIdeal ↑(OrderDual.ofDual s)) fun s _ =>
(vanishingIdeal_anti_mono_iff s.2).symm
#align prime_spectrum.closeds_embedding PrimeSpectrum.closedsEmbedding
theorem t1Space_iff_isField [IsDomain R] : T1Space (PrimeSpectrum R) ↔ IsField R := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· intro h
have hbot : Ideal.IsPrime (⊥ : Ideal R) := Ideal.bot_prime
exact
Classical.not_not.1
(mt
(Ring.ne_bot_of_isMaximal_of_not_isField <|
(isClosed_singleton_iff_isMaximal _).1 (T1Space.t1 ⟨⊥, hbot⟩))
(by aesop))
· refine ⟨fun x => (isClosed_singleton_iff_isMaximal x).2 ?_⟩
by_cases hx : x.asIdeal = ⊥
· letI := h.toSemifield
exact hx.symm ▸ Ideal.bot_isMaximal
· exact absurd h (Ring.not_isField_iff_exists_prime.2 ⟨x.asIdeal, ⟨hx, x.2⟩⟩)
#align prime_spectrum.t1_space_iff_is_field PrimeSpectrum.t1Space_iff_isField
local notation "Z(" a ")" => zeroLocus (a : Set R)
theorem isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff_of_radical (I : Ideal R) (hI : I.IsRadical) :
IsIrreducible (zeroLocus (I : Set R)) ↔ I.IsPrime := by
rw [Ideal.isPrime_iff, IsIrreducible]
apply and_congr
· rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, zeroLocus_empty_iff_eq_top]
· trans ∀ x y : Ideal R, Z(I) ⊆ Z(x) ∪ Z(y) → Z(I) ⊆ Z(x) ∨ Z(I) ⊆ Z(y)
· simp_rw [isPreirreducible_iff_closed_union_closed, isClosed_iff_zeroLocus_ideal]
constructor
· rintro h x y
exact h _ _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ ⟨y, rfl⟩
· rintro h _ _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact h x y
· simp_rw [← zeroLocus_inf, subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal,
vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical, hI.radical]
constructor
· simp_rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, ← Set.singleton_subset_iff, ← Ideal.span_le, ←
Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
refine fun h x y h' => h _ _ ?_
rw [← hI.radical_le_iff] at h' ⊢
simpa only [Ideal.radical_inf, Ideal.radical_mul] using h'
· simp_rw [or_iff_not_imp_left, SetLike.not_le_iff_exists]
rintro h s t h' ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩ y hy
exact h (h' ⟨Ideal.mul_mem_right _ _ hx, Ideal.mul_mem_left _ _ hy⟩) hx'
#align prime_spectrum.is_irreducible_zero_locus_iff_of_radical PrimeSpectrum.isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff_of_radical
theorem isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff (I : Ideal R) :
IsIrreducible (zeroLocus (I : Set R)) ↔ I.radical.IsPrime :=
zeroLocus_radical I ▸ isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff_of_radical _ I.radical_isRadical
#align prime_spectrum.is_irreducible_zero_locus_iff PrimeSpectrum.isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff
theorem isIrreducible_iff_vanishingIdeal_isPrime {s : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)} :
IsIrreducible s ↔ (vanishingIdeal s).IsPrime := by
rw [← isIrreducible_iff_closure, ← zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure,
isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff_of_radical _ (isRadical_vanishingIdeal s)]
#align prime_spectrum.is_irreducible_iff_vanishing_ideal_is_prime PrimeSpectrum.isIrreducible_iff_vanishingIdeal_isPrime
lemma vanishingIdeal_isIrreducible :
vanishingIdeal (R := R) '' {s | IsIrreducible s} = {P | P.IsPrime} :=
Set.ext fun I ↦ ⟨fun ⟨_, hs, e⟩ ↦ e ▸ isIrreducible_iff_vanishingIdeal_isPrime.mp hs,
fun h ↦ ⟨zeroLocus I, (isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff_of_radical _ h.isRadical).mpr h,
(vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical I).trans h.radical⟩⟩
lemma vanishingIdeal_isClosed_isIrreducible :
vanishingIdeal (R := R) '' {s | IsClosed s ∧ IsIrreducible s} = {P | P.IsPrime} := by
refine (subset_antisymm ?_ ?_).trans vanishingIdeal_isIrreducible
· exact Set.image_subset _ fun _ ↦ And.right
rintro _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
exact ⟨closure s, ⟨isClosed_closure, hs.closure⟩, vanishingIdeal_closure s⟩
instance irreducibleSpace [IsDomain R] : IrreducibleSpace (PrimeSpectrum R) := by
rw [irreducibleSpace_def, Set.top_eq_univ, ← zeroLocus_bot, isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff]
simpa using Ideal.bot_prime
instance quasiSober : QuasiSober (PrimeSpectrum R) :=
⟨fun {S} h₁ h₂ =>
⟨⟨_, isIrreducible_iff_vanishingIdeal_isPrime.1 h₁⟩, by
rw [IsGenericPoint, closure_singleton, zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure, h₂.closure_eq]⟩⟩
/-- The prime spectrum of a commutative (semi)ring is a compact topological space. -/
instance compactSpace : CompactSpace (PrimeSpectrum R) := by
refine compactSpace_of_finite_subfamily_closed fun S S_closed S_empty ↦ ?_
choose I hI using fun i ↦ (isClosed_iff_zeroLocus_ideal (S i)).mp (S_closed i)
simp_rw [hI, ← zeroLocus_iSup, zeroLocus_empty_iff_eq_top, ← top_le_iff] at S_empty ⊢
exact Ideal.isCompactElement_top.exists_finset_of_le_iSup _ _ S_empty
section Comap
variable {S' : Type*} [CommSemiring S']
theorem preimage_comap_zeroLocus_aux (f : R →+* S) (s : Set R) :
(fun y => ⟨Ideal.comap f y.asIdeal, inferInstance⟩ : PrimeSpectrum S → PrimeSpectrum R) ⁻¹'
zeroLocus s =
zeroLocus (f '' s) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_zeroLocus, Set.image_subset_iff, Set.mem_preimage, mem_zeroLocus, Ideal.coe_comap]
#align prime_spectrum.preimage_comap_zero_locus_aux PrimeSpectrum.preimage_comap_zeroLocus_aux
/-- The function between prime spectra of commutative (semi)rings induced by a ring homomorphism.
This function is continuous. -/
def comap (f : R →+* S) : C(PrimeSpectrum S, PrimeSpectrum R) where
toFun y := ⟨Ideal.comap f y.asIdeal, inferInstance⟩
continuous_toFun := by
simp only [continuous_iff_isClosed, isClosed_iff_zeroLocus]
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, preimage_comap_zeroLocus_aux f s⟩
#align prime_spectrum.comap PrimeSpectrum.comap
variable (f : R →+* S)
@[simp]
theorem comap_asIdeal (y : PrimeSpectrum S) : (comap f y).asIdeal = Ideal.comap f y.asIdeal :=
rfl
#align prime_spectrum.comap_as_ideal PrimeSpectrum.comap_asIdeal
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : comap (RingHom.id R) = ContinuousMap.id _ := by
ext
rfl
#align prime_spectrum.comap_id PrimeSpectrum.comap_id
@[simp]
theorem comap_comp (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* S') : comap (g.comp f) = (comap f).comp (comap g) :=
rfl
#align prime_spectrum.comap_comp PrimeSpectrum.comap_comp
theorem comap_comp_apply (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* S') (x : PrimeSpectrum S') :
PrimeSpectrum.comap (g.comp f) x = (PrimeSpectrum.comap f) (PrimeSpectrum.comap g x) :=
rfl
#align prime_spectrum.comap_comp_apply PrimeSpectrum.comap_comp_apply
@[simp]
theorem preimage_comap_zeroLocus (s : Set R) : comap f ⁻¹' zeroLocus s = zeroLocus (f '' s) :=
preimage_comap_zeroLocus_aux f s
#align prime_spectrum.preimage_comap_zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.preimage_comap_zeroLocus
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective (f : R →+* S) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Function.Injective (comap f) := fun x y h =>
PrimeSpectrum.ext _ _
(Ideal.comap_injective_of_surjective f hf
(congr_arg PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal h : (comap f x).asIdeal = (comap f y).asIdeal))
#align prime_spectrum.comap_injective_of_surjective PrimeSpectrum.comap_injective_of_surjective
variable (S)
theorem localization_comap_inducing [Algebra R S] (M : Submonoid R) [IsLocalization M S] :
Inducing (comap (algebraMap R S)) := by
refine ⟨TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed fun Z ↦ ?_⟩
simp_rw [isClosed_induced_iff, isClosed_iff_zeroLocus, @eq_comm _ _ (zeroLocus _),
exists_exists_eq_and, preimage_comap_zeroLocus]
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, rfl⟩
refine ⟨(Ideal.span s).comap (algebraMap R S), ?_⟩
rw [← zeroLocus_span, ← zeroLocus_span s, ← Ideal.map, IsLocalization.map_comap M S]
· rintro ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
#align prime_spectrum.localization_comap_inducing PrimeSpectrum.localization_comap_inducing
theorem localization_comap_injective [Algebra R S] (M : Submonoid R) [IsLocalization M S] :
Function.Injective (comap (algebraMap R S)) := by
intro p q h
replace h := congr_arg (fun x : PrimeSpectrum R => Ideal.map (algebraMap R S) x.asIdeal) h
dsimp only [comap, ContinuousMap.coe_mk] at h
rw [IsLocalization.map_comap M S, IsLocalization.map_comap M S] at h
ext1
exact h
#align prime_spectrum.localization_comap_injective PrimeSpectrum.localization_comap_injective
theorem localization_comap_embedding [Algebra R S] (M : Submonoid R) [IsLocalization M S] :
Embedding (comap (algebraMap R S)) :=
⟨localization_comap_inducing S M, localization_comap_injective S M⟩
#align prime_spectrum.localization_comap_embedding PrimeSpectrum.localization_comap_embedding
theorem localization_comap_range [Algebra R S] (M : Submonoid R) [IsLocalization M S] :
Set.range (comap (algebraMap R S)) = { p | Disjoint (M : Set R) p.asIdeal } := by
ext x
constructor
· simp_rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
rintro ⟨p, rfl⟩ x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
exact (p.2.1 : ¬_) (p.asIdeal.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem hx₂ (IsLocalization.map_units S ⟨x, hx₁⟩))
· intro h
use ⟨x.asIdeal.map (algebraMap R S), IsLocalization.isPrime_of_isPrime_disjoint M S _ x.2 h⟩
ext1
exact IsLocalization.comap_map_of_isPrime_disjoint M S _ x.2 h
#align prime_spectrum.localization_comap_range PrimeSpectrum.localization_comap_range
open Function RingHom
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/PrimeSpectrum/Basic.lean | 683 | 696 | theorem comap_inducing_of_surjective (hf : Surjective f) : Inducing (comap f) where
induced := by |
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
simp_rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, ← isClosed_compl_iff,
← @isClosed_compl_iff (PrimeSpectrum S)
((TopologicalSpace.induced (comap f) zariskiTopology)), isClosed_induced_iff,
isClosed_iff_zeroLocus]
refine fun s =>
⟨fun ⟨F, hF⟩ =>
⟨zeroLocus (f ⁻¹' F), ⟨f ⁻¹' F, rfl⟩, by
rw [preimage_comap_zeroLocus, Function.Surjective.image_preimage hf, hF]⟩,
?_⟩
rintro ⟨-, ⟨F, rfl⟩, hF⟩
exact ⟨f '' F, hF.symm.trans (preimage_comap_zeroLocus f F)⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Tower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Basic
#align_import field_theory.intermediate_field from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c596622fccd6e0321979d94931c964054dea2d26"
/-!
# Intermediate fields
Let `L / K` be a field extension, given as an instance `Algebra K L`.
This file defines the type of fields in between `K` and `L`, `IntermediateField K L`.
An `IntermediateField K L` is a subfield of `L` which contains (the image of) `K`,
i.e. it is a `Subfield L` and a `Subalgebra K L`.
## Main definitions
* `IntermediateField K L` : the type of intermediate fields between `K` and `L`.
* `Subalgebra.to_intermediateField`: turns a subalgebra closed under `⁻¹`
into an intermediate field
* `Subfield.to_intermediateField`: turns a subfield containing the image of `K`
into an intermediate field
* `IntermediateField.map`: map an intermediate field along an `AlgHom`
* `IntermediateField.restrict_scalars`: restrict the scalars of an intermediate field to a smaller
field in a tower of fields.
## Implementation notes
Intermediate fields are defined with a structure extending `Subfield` and `Subalgebra`.
A `Subalgebra` is closed under all operations except `⁻¹`,
## Tags
intermediate field, field extension
-/
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial
open Polynomial
variable (K L L' : Type*) [Field K] [Field L] [Field L'] [Algebra K L] [Algebra K L']
/-- `S : IntermediateField K L` is a subset of `L` such that there is a field
tower `L / S / K`. -/
structure IntermediateField extends Subalgebra K L where
inv_mem' : ∀ x ∈ carrier, x⁻¹ ∈ carrier
#align intermediate_field IntermediateField
/-- Reinterpret an `IntermediateField` as a `Subalgebra`. -/
add_decl_doc IntermediateField.toSubalgebra
variable {K L L'}
variable (S : IntermediateField K L)
namespace IntermediateField
instance : SetLike (IntermediateField K L) L :=
⟨fun S => S.toSubalgebra.carrier, by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp ⟩
protected theorem neg_mem {x : L} (hx : x ∈ S) : -x ∈ S := by
show -x ∈S.toSubalgebra; simpa
#align intermediate_field.neg_mem IntermediateField.neg_mem
/-- Reinterpret an `IntermediateField` as a `Subfield`. -/
def toSubfield : Subfield L :=
{ S.toSubalgebra with
neg_mem' := S.neg_mem,
inv_mem' := S.inv_mem' }
#align intermediate_field.to_subfield IntermediateField.toSubfield
instance : SubfieldClass (IntermediateField K L) L where
add_mem {s} := s.add_mem'
zero_mem {s} := s.zero_mem'
neg_mem {s} := s.neg_mem
mul_mem {s} := s.mul_mem'
one_mem {s} := s.one_mem'
inv_mem {s} := s.inv_mem' _
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): simp can prove it
theorem mem_carrier {s : IntermediateField K L} {x : L} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_carrier IntermediateField.mem_carrier
/-- Two intermediate fields are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : IntermediateField K L} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
#align intermediate_field.ext IntermediateField.ext
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubalgebra : (S.toSubalgebra : Set L) = S :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.coe_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubfield : (S.toSubfield : Set L) = S :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_to_subfield IntermediateField.coe_toSubfield
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk (s : Subsemiring L) (hK : ∀ x, algebraMap K L x ∈ s) (hi) (x : L) :
x ∈ IntermediateField.mk (Subalgebra.mk s hK) hi ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_mk IntermediateField.mem_mkₓ
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubalgebra (s : IntermediateField K L) (x : L) : x ∈ s.toSubalgebra ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.mem_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubfield (s : IntermediateField K L) (x : L) : x ∈ s.toSubfield ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_to_subfield IntermediateField.mem_toSubfield
/-- Copy of an intermediate field with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : IntermediateField K L) (s : Set L) (hs : s = ↑S) :
IntermediateField K L where
toSubalgebra := S.toSubalgebra.copy s (hs : s = S.toSubalgebra.carrier)
inv_mem' :=
have hs' : (S.toSubalgebra.copy s hs).carrier = S.toSubalgebra.carrier := hs
hs'.symm ▸ S.inv_mem'
#align intermediate_field.copy IntermediateField.copy
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : IntermediateField K L) (s : Set L) (hs : s = ↑S) :
(S.copy s hs : Set L) = s :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_copy IntermediateField.coe_copy
theorem copy_eq (S : IntermediateField K L) (s : Set L) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align intermediate_field.copy_eq IntermediateField.copy_eq
section InheritedLemmas
/-! ### Lemmas inherited from more general structures
The declarations in this section derive from the fact that an `IntermediateField` is also a
subalgebra or subfield. Their use should be replaceable with the corresponding lemma from a
subobject class.
-/
/-- An intermediate field contains the image of the smaller field. -/
theorem algebraMap_mem (x : K) : algebraMap K L x ∈ S :=
S.algebraMap_mem' x
#align intermediate_field.algebra_map_mem IntermediateField.algebraMap_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under scalar multiplication. -/
theorem smul_mem {y : L} : y ∈ S → ∀ {x : K}, x • y ∈ S :=
S.toSubalgebra.smul_mem
#align intermediate_field.smul_mem IntermediateField.smul_mem
/-- An intermediate field contains the ring's 1. -/
protected theorem one_mem : (1 : L) ∈ S :=
one_mem S
#align intermediate_field.one_mem IntermediateField.one_mem
/-- An intermediate field contains the ring's 0. -/
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : L) ∈ S :=
zero_mem S
#align intermediate_field.zero_mem IntermediateField.zero_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under multiplication. -/
protected theorem mul_mem {x y : L} : x ∈ S → y ∈ S → x * y ∈ S :=
mul_mem
#align intermediate_field.mul_mem IntermediateField.mul_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under addition. -/
protected theorem add_mem {x y : L} : x ∈ S → y ∈ S → x + y ∈ S :=
add_mem
#align intermediate_field.add_mem IntermediateField.add_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under subtraction -/
protected theorem sub_mem {x y : L} : x ∈ S → y ∈ S → x - y ∈ S :=
sub_mem
#align intermediate_field.sub_mem IntermediateField.sub_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under inverses. -/
protected theorem inv_mem {x : L} : x ∈ S → x⁻¹ ∈ S :=
inv_mem
#align intermediate_field.inv_mem IntermediateField.inv_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under division. -/
protected theorem div_mem {x y : L} : x ∈ S → y ∈ S → x / y ∈ S :=
div_mem
#align intermediate_field.div_mem IntermediateField.div_mem
/-- Product of a list of elements in an intermediate_field is in the intermediate_field. -/
protected theorem list_prod_mem {l : List L} : (∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ S) → l.prod ∈ S :=
list_prod_mem
#align intermediate_field.list_prod_mem IntermediateField.list_prod_mem
/-- Sum of a list of elements in an intermediate field is in the intermediate_field. -/
protected theorem list_sum_mem {l : List L} : (∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ S) → l.sum ∈ S :=
list_sum_mem
#align intermediate_field.list_sum_mem IntermediateField.list_sum_mem
/-- Product of a multiset of elements in an intermediate field is in the intermediate_field. -/
protected theorem multiset_prod_mem (m : Multiset L) : (∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ S) → m.prod ∈ S :=
multiset_prod_mem m
#align intermediate_field.multiset_prod_mem IntermediateField.multiset_prod_mem
/-- Sum of a multiset of elements in an `IntermediateField` is in the `IntermediateField`. -/
protected theorem multiset_sum_mem (m : Multiset L) : (∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ S) → m.sum ∈ S :=
multiset_sum_mem m
#align intermediate_field.multiset_sum_mem IntermediateField.multiset_sum_mem
/-- Product of elements of an intermediate field indexed by a `Finset` is in the intermediate_field.
-/
protected theorem prod_mem {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} {f : ι → L} (h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ S) :
(∏ i ∈ t, f i) ∈ S :=
prod_mem h
#align intermediate_field.prod_mem IntermediateField.prod_mem
/-- Sum of elements in an `IntermediateField` indexed by a `Finset` is in the `IntermediateField`.
-/
protected theorem sum_mem {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} {f : ι → L} (h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ S) :
(∑ i ∈ t, f i) ∈ S :=
sum_mem h
#align intermediate_field.sum_mem IntermediateField.sum_mem
protected theorem pow_mem {x : L} (hx : x ∈ S) (n : ℤ) : x ^ n ∈ S :=
zpow_mem hx n
#align intermediate_field.pow_mem IntermediateField.pow_mem
protected theorem zsmul_mem {x : L} (hx : x ∈ S) (n : ℤ) : n • x ∈ S :=
zsmul_mem hx n
#align intermediate_field.zsmul_mem IntermediateField.zsmul_mem
protected theorem intCast_mem (n : ℤ) : (n : L) ∈ S :=
intCast_mem S n
#align intermediate_field.coe_int_mem IntermediateField.intCast_mem
protected theorem coe_add (x y : S) : (↑(x + y) : L) = ↑x + ↑y :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_add IntermediateField.coe_add
protected theorem coe_neg (x : S) : (↑(-x) : L) = -↑x :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_neg IntermediateField.coe_neg
protected theorem coe_mul (x y : S) : (↑(x * y) : L) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_mul IntermediateField.coe_mul
protected theorem coe_inv (x : S) : (↑x⁻¹ : L) = (↑x)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_inv IntermediateField.coe_inv
protected theorem coe_zero : ((0 : S) : L) = 0 :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_zero IntermediateField.coe_zero
protected theorem coe_one : ((1 : S) : L) = 1 :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_one IntermediateField.coe_one
protected theorem coe_pow (x : S) (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n : S) : L) = (x : L) ^ n :=
SubmonoidClass.coe_pow x n
#align intermediate_field.coe_pow IntermediateField.coe_pow
end InheritedLemmas
theorem natCast_mem (n : ℕ) : (n : L) ∈ S := by simpa using intCast_mem S n
#align intermediate_field.coe_nat_mem IntermediateField.natCast_mem
-- 2024-04-05
@[deprecated _root_.natCast_mem] alias coe_nat_mem := natCast_mem
@[deprecated _root_.intCast_mem] alias coe_int_mem := intCast_mem
end IntermediateField
/-- Turn a subalgebra closed under inverses into an intermediate field -/
def Subalgebra.toIntermediateField (S : Subalgebra K L) (inv_mem : ∀ x ∈ S, x⁻¹ ∈ S) :
IntermediateField K L :=
{ S with
inv_mem' := inv_mem }
#align subalgebra.to_intermediate_field Subalgebra.toIntermediateField
@[simp]
theorem toSubalgebra_toIntermediateField (S : Subalgebra K L) (inv_mem : ∀ x ∈ S, x⁻¹ ∈ S) :
(S.toIntermediateField inv_mem).toSubalgebra = S := by
ext
rfl
#align to_subalgebra_to_intermediate_field toSubalgebra_toIntermediateField
@[simp]
theorem toIntermediateField_toSubalgebra (S : IntermediateField K L) :
(S.toSubalgebra.toIntermediateField fun x => S.inv_mem) = S := by
ext
rfl
#align to_intermediate_field_to_subalgebra toIntermediateField_toSubalgebra
/-- Turn a subalgebra satisfying `IsField` into an intermediate_field -/
def Subalgebra.toIntermediateField' (S : Subalgebra K L) (hS : IsField S) : IntermediateField K L :=
S.toIntermediateField fun x hx => by
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0, inv_zero]
exact S.zero_mem
letI hS' := hS.toField
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hS.mul_inv_cancel (show (⟨x, hx⟩ : S) ≠ 0 from Subtype.coe_ne_coe.1 hx0)
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, S.coe_mul, S.coe_one, Subtype.coe_mk, mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq₀ hx0] at hy
exact hy.symm ▸ y.2
#align subalgebra.to_intermediate_field' Subalgebra.toIntermediateField'
@[simp]
theorem toSubalgebra_toIntermediateField' (S : Subalgebra K L) (hS : IsField S) :
(S.toIntermediateField' hS).toSubalgebra = S := by
ext
rfl
#align to_subalgebra_to_intermediate_field' toSubalgebra_toIntermediateField'
@[simp]
theorem toIntermediateField'_toSubalgebra (S : IntermediateField K L) :
S.toSubalgebra.toIntermediateField' (Field.toIsField S) = S := by
ext
rfl
#align to_intermediate_field'_to_subalgebra toIntermediateField'_toSubalgebra
/-- Turn a subfield of `L` containing the image of `K` into an intermediate field -/
def Subfield.toIntermediateField (S : Subfield L) (algebra_map_mem : ∀ x, algebraMap K L x ∈ S) :
IntermediateField K L :=
{ S with
algebraMap_mem' := algebra_map_mem }
#align subfield.to_intermediate_field Subfield.toIntermediateField
namespace IntermediateField
/-- An intermediate field inherits a field structure -/
instance toField : Field S :=
S.toSubfield.toField
#align intermediate_field.to_field IntermediateField.toField
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → S) : (↑(∑ i, f i) : L) = ∑ i, (f i : L) := by
classical
induction' (Finset.univ : Finset ι) using Finset.induction_on with i s hi H
· simp
· rw [Finset.sum_insert hi, AddMemClass.coe_add, H, Finset.sum_insert hi]
#align intermediate_field.coe_sum IntermediateField.coe_sum
@[norm_cast] --Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/IntermediateField.lean | 352 | 356 | theorem coe_prod {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → S) : (↑(∏ i, f i) : L) = ∏ i, (f i : L) := by |
classical
induction' (Finset.univ : Finset ι) using Finset.induction_on with i s hi H
· simp
· rw [Finset.prod_insert hi, MulMemClass.coe_mul, H, Finset.prod_insert hi]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Defs
#align_import geometry.manifold.mfderiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e473c3198bb41f68560cab68a0529c854b618833"
/-!
# Basic properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative
In this file, we show various properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative,
mimicking the API for Fréchet derivatives.
- basic properties of unique differentiability sets
- various general lemmas about the manifold Fréchet derivative
- deducing differentiability from smoothness,
- deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds,
- congruence lemmas for derivatives on manifolds
- composition lemmas and the chain rule
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology Manifold
open Set Bundle
section DerivativesProperties
/-! ### Unique differentiability sets in manifolds -/
variable
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] {I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''}
{M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
{f f₀ f₁ : M → M'} {x : M} {s t : Set M} {g : M' → M''} {u : Set M'}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I univ x := by
unfold UniqueMDiffWithinAt
simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact I.unique_diff _ (mem_range_self _)
#align unique_mdiff_within_at_univ uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ
variable {I}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ (extChartAt I x).target)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
apply uniqueDiffWithinAt_congr
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
#align unique_mdiff_within_at_iff uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_nhds {s t : Set M} {x : M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds <| by simpa only [← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin] using Filter.map_mono ht
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem {s t : Set M} {x : M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds (nhdsWithin_le_iff.2 ht)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono (h : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
UniqueDiffWithinAt.mono h <| inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono st) (Subset.refl _)
#align unique_mdiff_within_at.mono UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter' (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.mono_of_mem (Filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin ht)
#align unique_mdiff_within_at.inter' UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter'
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.inter' (nhdsWithin_le_nhds ht)
#align unique_mdiff_within_at.inter UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffWithinAt (hs : IsOpen s) (xs : x ∈ s) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x :=
(uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).mono_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hs.mem_nhds xs
#align is_open.unique_mdiff_within_at IsOpen.uniqueMDiffWithinAt
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (ht : IsOpen t) : UniqueMDiffOn I (s ∩ t) :=
fun _x hx => UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs _ hx.1) (ht.mem_nhds hx.2)
#align unique_mdiff_on.inter UniqueMDiffOn.inter
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffOn (hs : IsOpen s) : UniqueMDiffOn I s :=
fun _x hx => hs.uniqueMDiffWithinAt hx
#align is_open.unique_mdiff_on IsOpen.uniqueMDiffOn
theorem uniqueMDiffOn_univ : UniqueMDiffOn I (univ : Set M) :=
isOpen_univ.uniqueMDiffOn
#align unique_mdiff_on_univ uniqueMDiffOn_univ
/- We name the typeclass variables related to `SmoothManifoldWithCorners` structure as they are
necessary in lemmas mentioning the derivative, but not in lemmas about differentiability, so we
want to include them or omit them when necessary. -/
variable [Is : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] [I's : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I' M']
[I''s : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I'' M'']
{f' f₀' f₁' : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' (f x)}
{g' : TangentSpace I' (f x) →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I'' (g (f x))}
/-- `UniqueMDiffWithinAt` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.eq (U : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (h₁ : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f₁') : f' = f₁' := by
-- Porting note: didn't need `convert` because of finding instances by unification
convert U.eq h.2 h₁.2
#align unique_mdiff_within_at.eq UniqueMDiffWithinAt.eq
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.eq (U : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (hx : x ∈ s) (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f')
(h₁ : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f₁') : f' = f₁' :=
UniqueMDiffWithinAt.eq (U _ hx) h h₁
#align unique_mdiff_on.eq UniqueMDiffOn.eq
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.prod {x : M} {y : M'} {s t} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I' t y) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
refine (hs.prod ht).mono ?_
rw [ModelWithCorners.range_prod, ← prod_inter_prod]
rfl
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.prod {s : Set M} {t : Set M'} (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s)
(ht : UniqueMDiffOn I' t) : UniqueMDiffOn (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) := fun x h ↦
(hs x.1 h.1).prod (ht x.2 h.2)
/-!
### General lemmas on derivatives of functions between manifolds
We mimick the API for functions between vector spaces
-/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff {f : M → M'} {s : Set M} {x : M} :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s) ((extChartAt I x) x) := by
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff']
refine and_congr Iff.rfl (exists_congr fun f' => ?_)
rw [inter_comm]
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
#align mdifferentiable_within_at_iff mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff
/-- One can reformulate differentiability within a set at a point as continuity within this set at
this point, and differentiability in any chart containing that point. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'}
(hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) (hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ Set.range I) ((extChartAt I x) x') :=
(differentiable_within_at_localInvariantProp I I').liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart
(StructureGroupoid.chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ x) hx (StructureGroupoid.chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ y)
hy
#align mdifferentiable_within_at_iff_of_mem_source mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source
theorem mfderivWithin_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableWithinAt
(h : ¬MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) : mfderivWithin I I' f s x = 0 := by
simp only [mfderivWithin, h, if_neg, not_false_iff]
#align mfderiv_within_zero_of_not_mdifferentiable_within_at mfderivWithin_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableWithinAt
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/Basic.lean | 166 | 167 | theorem mfderiv_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableAt (h : ¬MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
mfderiv I I' f x = 0 := by | simp only [mfderiv, h, if_neg, not_false_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
#align pi.himp_def Pi.himp_def
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
#align pi.hnot_def Pi.hnot_def
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
#align pi.himp_apply Pi.himp_apply
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
#align pi.hnot_apply Pi.hnot_apply
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
#align le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
#align le_himp_iff' le_himp_iff'
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
#align le_himp_comm le_himp_comm
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
#align le_himp le_himp
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
#align le_himp_iff_left le_himp_iff_left
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
#align himp_self himp_self
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
#align himp_inf_le himp_inf_le
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
#align inf_himp_le inf_himp_le
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
#align inf_himp inf_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_inf_self himp_inf_self
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
#align himp_eq_top_iff himp_eq_top_iff
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
#align himp_top himp_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
#align top_himp top_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
#align himp_himp himp_himp
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
#align himp_le_himp_himp_himp himp_le_himp_himp_himp
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_left_comm himp_left_comm
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
#align himp_idem himp_idem
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
#align himp_inf_distrib himp_inf_distrib
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
#align sup_himp_distrib sup_himp_distrib
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
#align himp_le_himp_left himp_le_himp_left
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
#align himp_le_himp_right himp_le_himp_right
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
#align himp_le_himp himp_le_himp
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
#align sup_himp_self_left sup_himp_self_left
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
#align sup_himp_self_right sup_himp_self_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
#align codisjoint.himp_eq_right Codisjoint.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
#align codisjoint.himp_eq_left Codisjoint.himp_eq_left
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
#align codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
#align codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
#align codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
#align le_himp_himp le_himp_himp
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
#align himp_triangle himp_triangle
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
#align himp_inf_himp_cancel himp_inf_himp_cancel
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_distrib_lattice GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
#align prod.generalized_heyting_algebra Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
#align pi.generalized_heyting_algebra Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
#align sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_le_iff' sdiff_le_iff'
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 447 | 447 | theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by | rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.oangle` is the oriented angle between two vectors with respect to an orientation.
## Implementation notes
The definitions here use the `Real.angle` type, angles modulo `2 * π`. For some purposes,
angles modulo `π` are more convenient, because results are true for such angles with less
configuration dependence. Results that are only equalities modulo `π` can be represented
modulo `2 * π` as equalities of `(2 : ℤ) • θ`.
## References
* Evan Chen, Euclidean Geometry in Mathematical Olympiads.
-/
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
/-- The oriented angle from `x` to `y`, modulo `2 * π`. If either vector is 0, this is 0.
See `InnerProductGeometry.angle` for the corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
#align orientation.oangle Orientation.oangle
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when the vectors involved are nonzero. -/
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
#align orientation.continuous_at_oangle Orientation.continuousAt_oangle
/-- If the first vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_left Orientation.oangle_zero_left
/-- If the second vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_right Orientation.oangle_zero_right
/-- If the two vectors passed to `oangle` are the same, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
#align orientation.oangle_self Orientation.oangle_self
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
/-- Swapping the two vectors passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
#align orientation.oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_rev
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left Orientation.oangle_neg_left
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_right
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right
/-- Negating both vectors passed to `oangle` does not change the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_neg (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) (-y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_neg Orientation.oangle_neg_neg
/-- Negating the first vector produces the same angle as negating the second vector. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg y, oangle_neg_neg, neg_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right
/-- The angle between the negation of a nonzero vector and that vector is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle (-x) x = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_left, hx]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_self_left Orientation.oangle_neg_self_left
/-- The angle between a nonzero vector and its negation is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle x (-x) = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_right, hx]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_self_right Orientation.oangle_neg_self_right
/-- Twice the angle between the negation of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) x = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and its negation is 0. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-x) = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the first vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, oangle_rev, add_left_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the second vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-x) = 0 := by
rw [o.oangle_rev (-x), oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, add_neg_self]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_pos Orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_pos
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_pos Orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_pos
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle (-x) y := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_neg Orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_neg
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_neg Orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_neg
/-- The angle between a nonnegative multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg
/-- The angle between a vector and a nonnegative multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg
/-- The angle between two nonnegative multiples of the same vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (hr₂ : 0 ≤ r₂) :
o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr₁.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h, hr₂]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero
/-- Twice the angle between a multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and a multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self
/-- Twice the angle between two multiples of a vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by by_cases h : r₁ = 0 <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the left are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq {x y : V} (z : V) (h : (ℝ ∙ x) = ℝ ∙ y) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle y z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the right are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq (x : V) {y z : V} (h : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq
/-- If the spans of two pairs of vectors are equal, twice angles between those vectors are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq {w x y z : V} (hwx : (ℝ ∙ w) = ℝ ∙ x)
(hyz : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle w y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [o.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq y hwx, o.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq x hyz]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ o.oangle y x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_zero]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if they are on the same ray. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_apply, Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal, Real.Angle.toReal_zero,
Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff]
simpa using o.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay x y
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_same_ray Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = π ↔ o.oangle y x = π := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only they are nonzero and the first is
on the same ray as the negation of the second. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ SameRay ℝ x (-y) := by
rw [← o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
refine ⟨hx, hy, ?_⟩
rw [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, h, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi]
· rintro ⟨hx, hy, h⟩
rwa [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, ← Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi, sub_eq_zero] at h
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_same_ray_neg Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors are
not linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ ¬LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg,
sameRay_or_ne_zero_and_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linear_independent Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if the first vector is zero
or the second is a multiple of the first. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : ℝ, y = r • x := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with (h | ⟨-, -, h⟩)
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
exact Or.inr ⟨r, rfl⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, hy⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
refine Or.inr ⟨-r, ?_⟩
simp [hy]
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩); · simp
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [← neg_smul]
exact Or.inr ⟨hx, smul_ne_zero hr.ne hx,
SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr)⟩
· simp [hr]
· exact Or.inl (SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x hr)
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is not zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors
are linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y ≠ 0 ∧ o.oangle x y ≠ π ↔ LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [← not_or, ← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not,
oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent]
#align orientation.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linear_independent Orientation.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent
/-- Two vectors are equal if and only if they have equal norms and zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero (x y : V) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ o.oangle x y = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp; rfl
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy)
· simp
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := h₂.exists_nonneg_right hy
have : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hy
obtain rfl : r = 1 := by
apply mul_right_cancel₀ this
simpa [norm_smul, _root_.abs_of_nonneg hr] using h₁
simp
#align orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero Orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero
/-- Two vectors with equal norms are equal if and only if they have zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) : x = y ↔ o.oangle x y = 0 :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).2, fun ha =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨h, ha⟩⟩
#align orientation.eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq Orientation.eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq
/-- Two vectors with zero angle between them are equal if and only if they have equal norms. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = 0) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).1, fun hn =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨hn, h⟩⟩
#align orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero Orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the second plus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z = o.oangle x z := by
simp_rw [oangle]
rw [← Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, o.kahler_mul y x z]
· congr 1
convert Complex.arg_real_mul _ (_ : 0 < ‖y‖ ^ 2) using 2
· norm_cast
· have : 0 < ‖y‖ := by simpa using hy
positivity
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hy hz
#align orientation.oangle_add Orientation.oangle_add
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the second and the third plus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle y z + o.oangle x y = o.oangle x z := by rw [add_comm, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_add_swap Orientation.oangle_add_swap
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the second and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle x y = o.oangle y z := by
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add_swap hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_left Orientation.oangle_sub_left
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the second. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle y z = o.oangle x y := by rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_right Orientation.oangle_sub_right
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x = 0 := by simp [hx, hy, hz]
#align orientation.oangle_add_cyc3 Orientation.oangle_add_cyc3
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the first
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) z + o.oangle (-z) x = π := by
rw [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy, o.oangle_neg_left hy hz, o.oangle_neg_left hz hx,
show o.oangle x y + π + (o.oangle y z + π) + (o.oangle z x + π) =
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x + (π + π + π : Real.Angle) by abel,
o.oangle_add_cyc3 hx hy hz, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, zero_add, zero_add]
#align orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left Orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the second
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-z) + o.oangle z (-x) = π := by
simp_rw [← oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right Orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right
/-- Pons asinorum, oriented vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle x (x - y) = o.oangle (y - x) y := by simp [oangle, h]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq Orientation.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq
/-- The angle at the apex of an isosceles triangle is `π` minus twice a base angle, oriented
vector angle form. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 578 | 589 | theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (hn : x ≠ y) (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle y x = π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) y := by |
rw [two_zsmul]
nth_rw 1 [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← oangle_neg_neg, ← add_assoc]
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [norm_zero, norm_eq_zero] at h
exact hn h
have hx : x ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (h.symm ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy)
convert o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right (neg_ne_zero.2 hy) hx (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hn.symm) using 1
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
#align_import data.polynomial.coeff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2651125b48fc5c170ab1111afd0817c903b1fc6c"
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The theorems include formulas for computing coefficients, such as
`coeff_add`, `coeff_sum`, `coeff_mul`
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset AddMonoidAlgebra
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section Coeff
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (p q : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (p + q) n = coeff p n + coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
rcases q with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_add, coeff]
exact Finsupp.add_apply _ _ _
#align polynomial.coeff_add Polynomial.coeff_add
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Coeff.lean | 49 | 49 | theorem coeff_bit0 (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (bit0 p) n = bit0 (coeff p n) := by | simp [bit0]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Geißer, Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Computation.ApproximationCorollaries
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Computation.Translations
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.Basic
#align_import number_theory.diophantine_approximation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e25a317463bd37d88e33da164465d8c47922b1cd"
/-!
# Diophantine Approximation
The first part of this file gives proofs of various versions of
**Dirichlet's approximation theorem** and its important consequence that when $\xi$ is an
irrational real number, then there are infinitely many rationals $x/y$ (in lowest terms)
such that
$$\left|\xi - \frac{x}{y}\right| < \frac{1}{y^2} \,.$$
The proof is based on the pigeonhole principle.
The second part of the file gives a proof of **Legendre's Theorem** on rational approximation,
which states that if $\xi$ is a real number and $x/y$ is a rational number such that
$$\left|\xi - \frac{x}{y}\right| < \frac{1}{2y^2} \,,$$
then $x/y$ must be a convergent of the continued fraction expansion of $\xi$.
## Main statements
The main results are three variants of Dirichlet's approximation theorem:
* `Real.exists_int_int_abs_mul_sub_le`, which states that for all real `ξ` and natural `0 < n`,
there are integers `j` and `k` with `0 < k ≤ n` and `|k*ξ - j| ≤ 1/(n+1)`,
* `Real.exists_nat_abs_mul_sub_round_le`, which replaces `j` by `round(k*ξ)` and uses
a natural number `k`,
* `Real.exists_rat_abs_sub_le_and_den_le`, which says that there is a rational number `q`
satisfying `|ξ - q| ≤ 1/((n+1)*q.den)` and `q.den ≤ n`,
and
* `Real.infinite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq_of_irrational`, which states that
for irrational `ξ`, the set `{q : ℚ | |ξ - q| < 1/q.den^2}` is infinite.
We also show a converse,
* `Rat.finite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq`, which states that the set above is finite
when `ξ` is a rational number.
Both statements are combined to give an equivalence,
`Real.infinite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq_iff_irrational`.
There are two versions of Legendre's Theorem. One, `Real.exists_rat_eq_convergent`, uses
`Real.convergent`, a simple recursive definition of the convergents that is also defined
in this file, whereas the other, `Real.exists_continued_fraction_convergent_eq_rat`, uses
`GeneralizedContinuedFraction.convergents` of `GeneralizedContinuedFraction.of ξ`.
## Implementation notes
We use the namespace `Real` for the results on real numbers and `Rat` for the results
on rational numbers. We introduce a secondary namespace `real.contfrac_legendre`
to separate off a definition and some technical auxiliary lemmas used in the proof
of Legendre's Theorem. For remarks on the proof of Legendre's Theorem, see below.
## References
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet%27s_approximation_theorem>
<https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kettenbruch> (The German Wikipedia page on continued
fractions is much more extensive than the English one.)
## Tags
Diophantine approximation, Dirichlet's approximation theorem, continued fraction
-/
namespace Real
section Dirichlet
/-!
### Dirichlet's approximation theorem
We show that for any real number `ξ` and positive natural `n`, there is a fraction `q`
such that `q.den ≤ n` and `|ξ - q| ≤ 1/((n+1)*q.den)`.
-/
open Finset Int
/-- *Dirichlet's approximation theorem:*
For any real number `ξ` and positive natural `n`, there are integers `j` and `k`,
with `0 < k ≤ n` and `|k*ξ - j| ≤ 1/(n+1)`.
See also `Real.exists_nat_abs_mul_sub_round_le`. -/
theorem exists_int_int_abs_mul_sub_le (ξ : ℝ) {n : ℕ} (n_pos : 0 < n) :
∃ j k : ℤ, 0 < k ∧ k ≤ n ∧ |↑k * ξ - j| ≤ 1 / (n + 1) := by
let f : ℤ → ℤ := fun m => ⌊fract (ξ * m) * (n + 1)⌋
have hn : 0 < (n : ℝ) + 1 := mod_cast Nat.succ_pos _
have hfu := fun m : ℤ => mul_lt_of_lt_one_left hn <| fract_lt_one (ξ * ↑m)
conv in |_| ≤ _ => rw [mul_comm, le_div_iff hn, ← abs_of_pos hn, ← abs_mul]
let D := Icc (0 : ℤ) n
by_cases H : ∃ m ∈ D, f m = n
· obtain ⟨m, hm, hf⟩ := H
have hf' : ((n : ℤ) : ℝ) ≤ fract (ξ * m) * (n + 1) := hf ▸ floor_le (fract (ξ * m) * (n + 1))
have hm₀ : 0 < m := by
have hf₀ : f 0 = 0 := by
-- Porting note: was
-- simp only [floor_eq_zero_iff, algebraMap.coe_zero, mul_zero, fract_zero,
-- zero_mul, Set.left_mem_Ico, zero_lt_one]
simp only [f, cast_zero, mul_zero, fract_zero, zero_mul, floor_zero]
refine Ne.lt_of_le (fun h => n_pos.ne ?_) (mem_Icc.mp hm).1
exact mod_cast hf₀.symm.trans (h.symm ▸ hf : f 0 = n)
refine ⟨⌊ξ * m⌋ + 1, m, hm₀, (mem_Icc.mp hm).2, ?_⟩
rw [cast_add, ← sub_sub, sub_mul, cast_one, one_mul, abs_le]
refine
⟨le_sub_iff_add_le.mpr ?_, sub_le_iff_le_add.mpr <| le_of_lt <| (hfu m).trans <| lt_one_add _⟩
simpa only [neg_add_cancel_comm_assoc] using hf'
· -- Porting note(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5127): added `not_and`
simp_rw [not_exists, not_and] at H
have hD : (Ico (0 : ℤ) n).card < D.card := by rw [card_Icc, card_Ico]; exact lt_add_one n
have hfu' : ∀ m, f m ≤ n := fun m => lt_add_one_iff.mp (floor_lt.mpr (mod_cast hfu m))
have hwd : ∀ m : ℤ, m ∈ D → f m ∈ Ico (0 : ℤ) n := fun x hx =>
mem_Ico.mpr
⟨floor_nonneg.mpr (mul_nonneg (fract_nonneg (ξ * x)) hn.le), Ne.lt_of_le (H x hx) (hfu' x)⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, x_lt_y, hxy⟩ : ∃ x ∈ D, ∃ y ∈ D, x < y ∧ f x = f y := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, x_ne_y, hxy⟩ := exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to hD hwd
rcases lt_trichotomy x y with (h | h | h)
exacts [⟨x, hx, y, hy, h, hxy⟩, False.elim (x_ne_y h), ⟨y, hy, x, hx, h, hxy.symm⟩]
refine
⟨⌊ξ * y⌋ - ⌊ξ * x⌋, y - x, sub_pos_of_lt x_lt_y,
sub_le_iff_le_add.mpr <| le_add_of_le_of_nonneg (mem_Icc.mp hy).2 (mem_Icc.mp hx).1, ?_⟩
convert_to |fract (ξ * y) * (n + 1) - fract (ξ * x) * (n + 1)| ≤ 1
· congr; push_cast; simp only [fract]; ring
exact (abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor hxy.symm).le
#align real.exists_int_int_abs_mul_sub_le Real.exists_int_int_abs_mul_sub_le
/-- *Dirichlet's approximation theorem:*
For any real number `ξ` and positive natural `n`, there is a natural number `k`,
with `0 < k ≤ n` such that `|k*ξ - round(k*ξ)| ≤ 1/(n+1)`.
-/
theorem exists_nat_abs_mul_sub_round_le (ξ : ℝ) {n : ℕ} (n_pos : 0 < n) :
∃ k : ℕ, 0 < k ∧ k ≤ n ∧ |↑k * ξ - round (↑k * ξ)| ≤ 1 / (n + 1) := by
obtain ⟨j, k, hk₀, hk₁, h⟩ := exists_int_int_abs_mul_sub_le ξ n_pos
have hk := toNat_of_nonneg hk₀.le
rw [← hk] at hk₀ hk₁ h
exact ⟨k.toNat, natCast_pos.mp hk₀, Nat.cast_le.mp hk₁, (round_le (↑k.toNat * ξ) j).trans h⟩
#align real.exists_nat_abs_mul_sub_round_le Real.exists_nat_abs_mul_sub_round_le
/-- *Dirichlet's approximation theorem:*
For any real number `ξ` and positive natural `n`, there is a fraction `q`
such that `q.den ≤ n` and `|ξ - q| ≤ 1/((n+1)*q.den)`.
See also `AddCircle.exists_norm_nsmul_le`. -/
theorem exists_rat_abs_sub_le_and_den_le (ξ : ℝ) {n : ℕ} (n_pos : 0 < n) :
∃ q : ℚ, |ξ - q| ≤ 1 / ((n + 1) * q.den) ∧ q.den ≤ n := by
obtain ⟨j, k, hk₀, hk₁, h⟩ := exists_int_int_abs_mul_sub_le ξ n_pos
have hk₀' : (0 : ℝ) < k := Int.cast_pos.mpr hk₀
have hden : ((j / k : ℚ).den : ℤ) ≤ k := by
convert le_of_dvd hk₀ (Rat.den_dvd j k)
exact Rat.intCast_div_eq_divInt _ _
refine ⟨j / k, ?_, Nat.cast_le.mp (hden.trans hk₁)⟩
rw [← div_div, le_div_iff (Nat.cast_pos.mpr <| Rat.pos _ : (0 : ℝ) < _)]
refine (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (Int.cast_le.mpr hden : _ ≤ (k : ℝ)) (abs_nonneg _)).trans ?_
rwa [← abs_of_pos hk₀', Rat.cast_div, Rat.cast_intCast, Rat.cast_intCast, ← abs_mul, sub_mul,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ hk₀'.ne', mul_comm]
#align real.exists_rat_abs_sub_le_and_denom_le Real.exists_rat_abs_sub_le_and_den_le
end Dirichlet
section RatApprox
/-!
### Infinitely many good approximations to irrational numbers
We show that an irrational real number `ξ` has infinitely many "good rational approximations",
i.e., fractions `x/y` in lowest terms such that `|ξ - x/y| < 1/y^2`.
-/
open Set
/-- Given any rational approximation `q` to the irrational real number `ξ`, there is
a good rational approximation `q'` such that `|ξ - q'| < |ξ - q|`. -/
theorem exists_rat_abs_sub_lt_and_lt_of_irrational {ξ : ℝ} (hξ : Irrational ξ) (q : ℚ) :
∃ q' : ℚ, |ξ - q'| < 1 / (q'.den : ℝ) ^ 2 ∧ |ξ - q'| < |ξ - q| := by
have h := abs_pos.mpr (sub_ne_zero.mpr <| Irrational.ne_rat hξ q)
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_nat_gt (1 / |ξ - q|)
have m_pos : (0 : ℝ) < m := (one_div_pos.mpr h).trans hm
obtain ⟨q', hbd, hden⟩ := exists_rat_abs_sub_le_and_den_le ξ (Nat.cast_pos.mp m_pos)
have den_pos : (0 : ℝ) < q'.den := Nat.cast_pos.mpr q'.pos
have md_pos := mul_pos (add_pos m_pos zero_lt_one) den_pos
refine
⟨q', lt_of_le_of_lt hbd ?_,
lt_of_le_of_lt hbd <|
(one_div_lt md_pos h).mpr <|
hm.trans <|
lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_add_one _) <|
(le_mul_iff_one_le_right <| add_pos m_pos zero_lt_one).mpr <|
mod_cast (q'.pos : 1 ≤ q'.den)⟩
rw [sq, one_div_lt_one_div md_pos (mul_pos den_pos den_pos), mul_lt_mul_right den_pos]
exact lt_add_of_le_of_pos (Nat.cast_le.mpr hden) zero_lt_one
#align real.exists_rat_abs_sub_lt_and_lt_of_irrational Real.exists_rat_abs_sub_lt_and_lt_of_irrational
/-- If `ξ` is an irrational real number, then there are infinitely many good
rational approximations to `ξ`. -/
theorem infinite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq_of_irrational {ξ : ℝ} (hξ : Irrational ξ) :
{q : ℚ | |ξ - q| < 1 / (q.den : ℝ) ^ 2}.Infinite := by
refine Or.resolve_left (Set.finite_or_infinite _) fun h => ?_
obtain ⟨q, _, hq⟩ :=
exists_min_image {q : ℚ | |ξ - q| < 1 / (q.den : ℝ) ^ 2} (fun q => |ξ - q|) h
⟨⌊ξ⌋, by simp [abs_of_nonneg, Int.fract_lt_one]⟩
obtain ⟨q', hmem, hbetter⟩ := exists_rat_abs_sub_lt_and_lt_of_irrational hξ q
exact lt_irrefl _ (lt_of_le_of_lt (hq q' hmem) hbetter)
#align real.infinite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_denom_sq_of_irrational Real.infinite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq_of_irrational
end RatApprox
end Real
namespace Rat
/-!
### Finitely many good approximations to rational numbers
We now show that a rational number `ξ` has only finitely many good rational
approximations.
-/
open Set
/-- If `ξ` is rational, then the good rational approximations to `ξ` have bounded
numerator and denominator. -/
theorem den_le_and_le_num_le_of_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq {ξ q : ℚ}
(h : |ξ - q| < 1 / (q.den : ℚ) ^ 2) :
q.den ≤ ξ.den ∧ ⌈ξ * q.den⌉ - 1 ≤ q.num ∧ q.num ≤ ⌊ξ * q.den⌋ + 1 := by
have hq₀ : (0 : ℚ) < q.den := Nat.cast_pos.mpr q.pos
replace h : |ξ * q.den - q.num| < 1 / q.den := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_right hq₀] at h
conv_lhs at h => rw [← abs_of_pos hq₀, ← abs_mul, sub_mul, mul_den_eq_num]
rwa [sq, div_mul, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hq₀.ne'] at h
constructor
· rcases eq_or_ne ξ q with (rfl | H)
· exact le_rfl
· have hξ₀ : (0 : ℚ) < ξ.den := Nat.cast_pos.mpr ξ.pos
rw [← Rat.num_div_den ξ, div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_sub' _ _ _ hξ₀.ne', abs_div, abs_of_pos hξ₀,
div_lt_iff hξ₀, div_mul_comm, mul_one] at h
refine Nat.cast_le.mp ((one_lt_div hq₀).mp <| lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ h).le
norm_cast
rw [mul_comm _ q.num]
exact Int.one_le_abs (sub_ne_zero_of_ne <| mt Rat.eq_iff_mul_eq_mul.mpr H)
· obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ :=
abs_sub_lt_iff.mp
(h.trans_le <|
(one_div_le zero_lt_one hq₀).mp <| (@one_div_one ℚ _).symm ▸ Nat.cast_le.mpr q.pos)
rw [sub_lt_iff_lt_add, add_comm] at h₁ h₂
rw [← sub_lt_iff_lt_add] at h₂
norm_cast at h₁ h₂
exact
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.mpr (Int.ceil_le.mpr h₁.le), sub_le_iff_le_add.mp (Int.le_floor.mpr h₂.le)⟩
#align rat.denom_le_and_le_num_le_of_sub_lt_one_div_denom_sq Rat.den_le_and_le_num_le_of_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq
/-- A rational number has only finitely many good rational approximations. -/
theorem finite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq (ξ : ℚ) :
{q : ℚ | |ξ - q| < 1 / (q.den : ℚ) ^ 2}.Finite := by
let f : ℚ → ℤ × ℕ := fun q => (q.num, q.den)
set s := {q : ℚ | |ξ - q| < 1 / (q.den : ℚ) ^ 2}
have hinj : Function.Injective f := by
intro a b hab
simp only [f, Prod.mk.inj_iff] at hab
rw [← Rat.num_div_den a, ← Rat.num_div_den b, hab.1, hab.2]
have H : f '' s ⊆ ⋃ (y : ℕ) (_ : y ∈ Ioc 0 ξ.den), Icc (⌈ξ * y⌉ - 1) (⌊ξ * y⌋ + 1) ×ˢ {y} := by
intro xy hxy
simp only [mem_image, mem_setOf] at hxy
obtain ⟨q, hq₁, hq₂⟩ := hxy
obtain ⟨hd, hn⟩ := den_le_and_le_num_le_of_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq hq₁
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
refine ⟨q.den, Set.mem_Ioc.mpr ⟨q.pos, hd⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [prod_singleton, mem_image, mem_Icc, (congr_arg Prod.snd (Eq.symm hq₂)).trans rfl]
exact ⟨q.num, hn, hq₂⟩
refine (Finite.subset ?_ H).of_finite_image hinj.injOn
exact Finite.biUnion (finite_Ioc _ _) fun x _ => Finite.prod (finite_Icc _ _) (finite_singleton _)
#align rat.finite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_denom_sq Rat.finite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq
end Rat
/-- The set of good rational approximations to a real number `ξ` is infinite if and only if
`ξ` is irrational. -/
theorem Real.infinite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq_iff_irrational (ξ : ℝ) :
{q : ℚ | |ξ - q| < 1 / (q.den : ℝ) ^ 2}.Infinite ↔ Irrational ξ := by
refine
⟨fun h => (irrational_iff_ne_rational ξ).mpr fun a b H => Set.not_infinite.mpr ?_ h,
Real.infinite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq_of_irrational⟩
convert Rat.finite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq ((a : ℚ) / b) with q
rw [H, (by (push_cast; rfl) : (1 : ℝ) / (q.den : ℝ) ^ 2 = (1 / (q.den : ℚ) ^ 2 : ℚ))]
norm_cast
#align real.infinite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_denom_sq_iff_irrational Real.infinite_rat_abs_sub_lt_one_div_den_sq_iff_irrational
/-!
### Legendre's Theorem on Rational Approximation
We prove **Legendre's Theorem** on rational approximation: If $\xi$ is a real number and
$x/y$ is a rational number such that $|\xi - x/y| < 1/(2y^2)$,
then $x/y$ is a convergent of the continued fraction expansion of $\xi$.
The proof is by induction. However, the induction proof does not work with the
statement as given, since the assumption is too weak to imply the corresponding
statement for the application of the induction hypothesis. This can be remedied
by making the statement slightly stronger. Namely, we assume that $|\xi - x/y| < 1/(y(2y-1))$
when $y \ge 2$ and $-\frac{1}{2} < \xi - x < 1$ when $y = 1$.
-/
section Convergent
namespace Real
open Int
/-!
### Convergents: definition and API lemmas
-/
/-- We give a direct recursive definition of the convergents of the continued fraction
expansion of a real number `ξ`. The main reason for that is that we want to have the
convergents as rational numbers; the versions
`(GeneralizedContinuedFraction.of ξ).convergents` and
`(GeneralizedContinuedFraction.of ξ).convergents'` always give something of the
same type as `ξ`. We can then also use dot notation `ξ.convergent n`.
Another minor reason is that this demonstrates that the proof
of Legendre's theorem does not need anything beyond this definition.
We provide a proof that this definition agrees with the other one;
see `Real.continued_fraction_convergent_eq_convergent`.
(Note that we use the fact that `1/0 = 0` here to make it work for rational `ξ`.) -/
noncomputable def convergent : ℝ → ℕ → ℚ
| ξ, 0 => ⌊ξ⌋
| ξ, n + 1 => ⌊ξ⌋ + (convergent (fract ξ)⁻¹ n)⁻¹
#align real.convergent Real.convergent
/-- The zeroth convergent of `ξ` is `⌊ξ⌋`. -/
@[simp]
theorem convergent_zero (ξ : ℝ) : ξ.convergent 0 = ⌊ξ⌋ :=
rfl
#align real.convergent_zero Real.convergent_zero
/-- The `(n+1)`th convergent of `ξ` is the `n`th convergent of `1/(fract ξ)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem convergent_succ (ξ : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
ξ.convergent (n + 1) = ⌊ξ⌋ + ((fract ξ)⁻¹.convergent n)⁻¹ :=
-- Porting note(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026): was
-- by simp only [convergent]
rfl
#align real.convergent_succ Real.convergent_succ
/-- All convergents of `0` are zero. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/DiophantineApproximation.lean | 356 | 359 | theorem convergent_of_zero (n : ℕ) : convergent 0 n = 0 := by |
induction' n with n ih
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, convergent_zero, floor_zero, cast_zero]
· simp only [ih, convergent_succ, floor_zero, cast_zero, fract_zero, add_zero, inv_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Defs
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
#align_import algebra.order.group.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b599f4e4e5cf1fbcb4194503671d3d9e569c1fce"
/-!
# Ordered groups
This file develops the basics of ordered groups.
## Implementation details
Unfortunately, the number of `'` appended to lemmas in this file
may differ between the multiplicative and the additive version of a lemma.
The reason is that we did not want to change existing names in the library.
-/
open Function
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
/-- An ordered additive commutative group is an additive commutative group
with a partial order in which addition is strictly monotone. -/
class OrderedAddCommGroup (α : Type u) extends AddCommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Addition is monotone in an ordered additive commutative group. -/
protected add_le_add_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c + a ≤ c + b
#align ordered_add_comm_group OrderedAddCommGroup
/-- An ordered commutative group is a commutative group
with a partial order in which multiplication is strictly monotone. -/
class OrderedCommGroup (α : Type u) extends CommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Multiplication is monotone in an ordered commutative group. -/
protected mul_le_mul_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c * a ≤ c * b
#align ordered_comm_group OrderedCommGroup
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup
@[to_additive]
instance OrderedCommGroup.to_covariantClass_left_le (α : Type u) [OrderedCommGroup α] :
CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) where
elim a b c bc := OrderedCommGroup.mul_le_mul_left b c bc a
#align ordered_comm_group.to_covariant_class_left_le OrderedCommGroup.to_covariantClass_left_le
#align ordered_add_comm_group.to_covariant_class_left_le OrderedAddCommGroup.to_covariantClass_left_le
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive OrderedAddCommGroup.toOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid]
instance (priority := 100) OrderedCommGroup.toOrderedCancelCommMonoid [OrderedCommGroup α] :
OrderedCancelCommMonoid α :=
{ ‹OrderedCommGroup α› with le_of_mul_le_mul_left := fun a b c ↦ le_of_mul_le_mul_left' }
#align ordered_comm_group.to_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid OrderedCommGroup.toOrderedCancelCommMonoid
#align ordered_add_comm_group.to_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid OrderedAddCommGroup.toOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
example (α : Type u) [OrderedAddCommGroup α] : CovariantClass α α (swap (· + ·)) (· < ·) :=
IsRightCancelAdd.covariant_swap_add_lt_of_covariant_swap_add_le α
-- Porting note: this instance is not used,
-- and causes timeouts after lean4#2210.
-- It was introduced in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/17564
-- but without the motivation clearly explained.
/-- A choice-free shortcut instance. -/
@[to_additive "A choice-free shortcut instance."]
theorem OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_left_le (α : Type u) [OrderedCommGroup α] :
ContravariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) where
elim a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_left' bc a⁻¹
#align ordered_comm_group.to_contravariant_class_left_le OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_left_le
#align ordered_add_comm_group.to_contravariant_class_left_le OrderedAddCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_left_le
-- Porting note: this instance is not used,
-- and causes timeouts after lean4#2210.
-- See further explanation on `OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_left_le`.
/-- A choice-free shortcut instance. -/
@[to_additive "A choice-free shortcut instance."]
theorem OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_right_le (α : Type u) [OrderedCommGroup α] :
ContravariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·) where
elim a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_right' bc a⁻¹
#align ordered_comm_group.to_contravariant_class_right_le OrderedCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_right_le
#align ordered_add_comm_group.to_contravariant_class_right_le OrderedAddCommGroup.to_contravariantClass_right_le
section Group
variable [Group α]
section TypeclassesLeftLE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
/-- Uses `left` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `left` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Left.inv_le_one_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left a]
simp
#align left.inv_le_one_iff Left.inv_le_one_iff
#align left.neg_nonpos_iff Left.neg_nonpos_iff
/-- Uses `left` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `left` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Left.one_le_inv_iff : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left a]
simp
#align left.one_le_inv_iff Left.one_le_inv_iff
#align left.nonneg_neg_iff Left.nonneg_neg_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le : b ≤ a⁻¹ * c ↔ a * b ≤ c := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left a]
simp
#align le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le
#align le_neg_add_iff_add_le le_neg_add_iff_add_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul : b⁻¹ * a ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left b, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul
#align neg_add_le_iff_le_add neg_add_le_iff_le_add
@[to_additive neg_le_iff_add_nonneg']
theorem inv_le_iff_one_le_mul' : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_left a).symm.trans <| by rw [mul_inv_self]
#align inv_le_iff_one_le_mul' inv_le_iff_one_le_mul'
#align neg_le_iff_add_nonneg' neg_le_iff_add_nonneg'
@[to_additive]
theorem le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_left : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b * a ≤ 1 :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_left b).symm.trans <| by rw [mul_inv_self]
#align le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_left le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_left
#align le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_left le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_left
@[to_additive]
theorem le_inv_mul_iff_le : 1 ≤ b⁻¹ * a ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left b, mul_one, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align le_inv_mul_iff_le le_inv_mul_iff_le
#align le_neg_add_iff_le le_neg_add_iff_le
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_le_one_iff : a⁻¹ * b ≤ 1 ↔ b ≤ a :=
-- Porting note: why is the `_root_` needed?
_root_.trans inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul <| by rw [mul_one]
#align inv_mul_le_one_iff inv_mul_le_one_iff
#align neg_add_nonpos_iff neg_add_nonpos_iff
end TypeclassesLeftLE
section TypeclassesLeftLT
variable [LT α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] {a b c : α}
/-- Uses `left` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) Left.neg_pos_iff "Uses `left` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Left.one_lt_inv_iff : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left a, mul_inv_self, mul_one]
#align left.one_lt_inv_iff Left.one_lt_inv_iff
#align left.neg_pos_iff Left.neg_pos_iff
/-- Uses `left` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `left` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Left.inv_lt_one_iff : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left a, mul_inv_self, mul_one]
#align left.inv_lt_one_iff Left.inv_lt_one_iff
#align left.neg_neg_iff Left.neg_neg_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt : b < a⁻¹ * c ↔ a * b < c := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left a]
simp
#align lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt
#align lt_neg_add_iff_add_lt lt_neg_add_iff_add_lt
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul : b⁻¹ * a < c ↔ a < b * c := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left b, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul
#align neg_add_lt_iff_lt_add neg_add_lt_iff_lt_add
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul' : a⁻¹ < b ↔ 1 < a * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left a).symm.trans <| by rw [mul_inv_self]
#align inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul' inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul'
#align neg_lt_iff_pos_add' neg_lt_iff_pos_add'
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one' : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b * a < 1 :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left b).symm.trans <| by rw [mul_inv_self]
#align lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one' lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one'
#align lt_neg_iff_add_neg' lt_neg_iff_add_neg'
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_inv_mul_iff_lt : 1 < b⁻¹ * a ↔ b < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left b, mul_one, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align lt_inv_mul_iff_lt lt_inv_mul_iff_lt
#align lt_neg_add_iff_lt lt_neg_add_iff_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_lt_one_iff : a⁻¹ * b < 1 ↔ b < a :=
_root_.trans inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul <| by rw [mul_one]
#align inv_mul_lt_one_iff inv_mul_lt_one_iff
#align neg_add_neg_iff neg_add_neg_iff
end TypeclassesLeftLT
section TypeclassesRightLE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c : α}
/-- Uses `right` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `right` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Right.inv_le_one_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right a]
simp
#align right.inv_le_one_iff Right.inv_le_one_iff
#align right.neg_nonpos_iff Right.neg_nonpos_iff
/-- Uses `right` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `right` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Right.one_le_inv_iff : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right a]
simp
#align right.one_le_inv_iff Right.one_le_inv_iff
#align right.nonneg_neg_iff Right.nonneg_neg_iff
@[to_additive neg_le_iff_add_nonneg]
theorem inv_le_iff_one_le_mul : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ b * a :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_right a).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_self]
#align inv_le_iff_one_le_mul inv_le_iff_one_le_mul
#align neg_le_iff_add_nonneg neg_le_iff_add_nonneg
@[to_additive]
theorem le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_right : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ a * b ≤ 1 :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_self]
#align le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_right le_inv_iff_mul_le_one_right
#align le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_right le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul
#align add_neg_le_iff_le_add add_neg_le_iff_le_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_mul_inv_iff_mul_le : c ≤ a * b⁻¹ ↔ c * b ≤ a :=
(mul_le_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align le_mul_inv_iff_mul_le le_mul_inv_iff_mul_le
#align le_add_neg_iff_add_le le_add_neg_iff_add_le
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_le_one_iff_le : a * b⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ b :=
mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul.trans <| by rw [one_mul]
#align mul_inv_le_one_iff_le mul_inv_le_one_iff_le
#align add_neg_nonpos_iff_le add_neg_nonpos_iff_le
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_inv_iff_le : 1 ≤ a * b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align le_mul_inv_iff_le le_mul_inv_iff_le
#align le_add_neg_iff_le le_add_neg_iff_le
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_le_one_iff : b * a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ b ≤ a :=
_root_.trans mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul <| by rw [one_mul]
#align mul_inv_le_one_iff mul_inv_le_one_iff
#align add_neg_nonpos_iff add_neg_nonpos_iff
end TypeclassesRightLE
section TypeclassesRightLT
variable [LT α] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·)] {a b c : α}
/-- Uses `right` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Uses `right` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Right.inv_lt_one_iff : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right a, inv_mul_self, one_mul]
#align right.inv_lt_one_iff Right.inv_lt_one_iff
#align right.neg_neg_iff Right.neg_neg_iff
/-- Uses `right` co(ntra)variant. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) Right.neg_pos_iff "Uses `right` co(ntra)variant."]
theorem Right.one_lt_inv_iff : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right a, inv_mul_self, one_mul]
#align right.one_lt_inv_iff Right.one_lt_inv_iff
#align right.neg_pos_iff Right.neg_pos_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul : a⁻¹ < b ↔ 1 < b * a :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_right a).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_self]
#align inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul
#align neg_lt_iff_pos_add neg_lt_iff_pos_add
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one : a < b⁻¹ ↔ a * b < 1 :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_self]
#align lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one lt_inv_iff_mul_lt_one
#align lt_neg_iff_add_neg lt_neg_iff_add_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_inv_lt_iff_lt_mul : a * b⁻¹ < c ↔ a < c * b := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align mul_inv_lt_iff_lt_mul mul_inv_lt_iff_lt_mul
#align add_neg_lt_iff_lt_add add_neg_lt_iff_lt_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lt_mul_inv_iff_mul_lt : c < a * b⁻¹ ↔ c * b < a :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_right b).symm.trans <| by rw [inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align lt_mul_inv_iff_mul_lt lt_mul_inv_iff_mul_lt
#align lt_add_neg_iff_add_lt lt_add_neg_iff_add_lt
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_lt_one_iff_lt : a * b⁻¹ < 1 ↔ a < b := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, inv_mul_cancel_right, one_mul]
#align inv_mul_lt_one_iff_lt inv_mul_lt_one_iff_lt
#align neg_add_neg_iff_lt neg_add_neg_iff_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_inv_iff_lt : 1 < a * b⁻¹ ↔ b < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align lt_mul_inv_iff_lt lt_mul_inv_iff_lt
#align lt_add_neg_iff_lt lt_add_neg_iff_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_lt_one_iff : b * a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ b < a :=
_root_.trans mul_inv_lt_iff_lt_mul <| by rw [one_mul]
#align mul_inv_lt_one_iff mul_inv_lt_one_iff
#align add_neg_neg_iff add_neg_neg_iff
end TypeclassesRightLT
section TypeclassesLeftRightLE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)]
{a b c d : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_inv_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left a, ← mul_le_mul_iff_right b]
simp
#align inv_le_inv_iff inv_le_inv_iff
#align neg_le_neg_iff neg_le_neg_iff
alias ⟨le_of_neg_le_neg, _⟩ := neg_le_neg_iff
#align le_of_neg_le_neg le_of_neg_le_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff : a * b⁻¹ ≤ d⁻¹ * c ↔ d * a ≤ c * b := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_left d, ← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, mul_inv_cancel_left, mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff
#align add_neg_le_neg_add_iff add_neg_le_neg_add_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_le_self_iff (a : α) {b : α} : a / b ≤ a ↔ 1 ≤ b := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align div_le_self_iff div_le_self_iff
#align sub_le_self_iff sub_le_self_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_div_self_iff (a : α) {b : α} : a ≤ a / b ↔ b ≤ 1 := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align le_div_self_iff le_div_self_iff
#align le_sub_self_iff le_sub_self_iff
alias ⟨_, sub_le_self⟩ := sub_le_self_iff
#align sub_le_self sub_le_self
end TypeclassesLeftRightLE
section TypeclassesLeftRightLT
variable [LT α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·)]
{a b c d : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_lt_inv_iff : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left a, ← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b]
simp
#align inv_lt_inv_iff inv_lt_inv_iff
#align neg_lt_neg_iff neg_lt_neg_iff
@[to_additive neg_lt]
theorem inv_lt' : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a := by rw [← inv_lt_inv_iff, inv_inv]
#align inv_lt' inv_lt'
#align neg_lt neg_lt
@[to_additive lt_neg]
theorem lt_inv' : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_lt_inv_iff, inv_inv]
#align lt_inv' lt_inv'
#align lt_neg lt_neg
alias ⟨lt_inv_of_lt_inv, _⟩ := lt_inv'
#align lt_inv_of_lt_inv lt_inv_of_lt_inv
attribute [to_additive] lt_inv_of_lt_inv
#align lt_neg_of_lt_neg lt_neg_of_lt_neg
alias ⟨inv_lt_of_inv_lt', _⟩ := inv_lt'
#align inv_lt_of_inv_lt' inv_lt_of_inv_lt'
attribute [to_additive neg_lt_of_neg_lt] inv_lt_of_inv_lt'
#align neg_lt_of_neg_lt neg_lt_of_neg_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_lt_inv_mul_iff : a * b⁻¹ < d⁻¹ * c ↔ d * a < c * b := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_left d, ← mul_lt_mul_iff_right b, mul_inv_cancel_left, mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align mul_inv_lt_inv_mul_iff mul_inv_lt_inv_mul_iff
#align add_neg_lt_neg_add_iff add_neg_lt_neg_add_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_lt_self_iff (a : α) {b : α} : a / b < a ↔ 1 < b := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align div_lt_self_iff div_lt_self_iff
#align sub_lt_self_iff sub_lt_self_iff
alias ⟨_, sub_lt_self⟩ := sub_lt_self_iff
#align sub_lt_self sub_lt_self
end TypeclassesLeftRightLT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LeftLE
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem Left.inv_le_self (h : 1 ≤ a) : a⁻¹ ≤ a :=
le_trans (Left.inv_le_one_iff.mpr h) h
#align left.inv_le_self Left.inv_le_self
#align left.neg_le_self Left.neg_le_self
alias neg_le_self := Left.neg_le_self
#align neg_le_self neg_le_self
@[to_additive]
theorem Left.self_le_inv (h : a ≤ 1) : a ≤ a⁻¹ :=
le_trans h (Left.one_le_inv_iff.mpr h)
#align left.self_le_inv Left.self_le_inv
#align left.self_le_neg Left.self_le_neg
end LeftLE
section LeftLT
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem Left.inv_lt_self (h : 1 < a) : a⁻¹ < a :=
(Left.inv_lt_one_iff.mpr h).trans h
#align left.inv_lt_self Left.inv_lt_self
#align left.neg_lt_self Left.neg_lt_self
alias neg_lt_self := Left.neg_lt_self
#align neg_lt_self neg_lt_self
@[to_additive]
theorem Left.self_lt_inv (h : a < 1) : a < a⁻¹ :=
lt_trans h (Left.one_lt_inv_iff.mpr h)
#align left.self_lt_inv Left.self_lt_inv
#align left.self_lt_neg Left.self_lt_neg
end LeftLT
section RightLE
variable [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem Right.inv_le_self (h : 1 ≤ a) : a⁻¹ ≤ a :=
le_trans (Right.inv_le_one_iff.mpr h) h
#align right.inv_le_self Right.inv_le_self
#align right.neg_le_self Right.neg_le_self
@[to_additive]
theorem Right.self_le_inv (h : a ≤ 1) : a ≤ a⁻¹ :=
le_trans h (Right.one_le_inv_iff.mpr h)
#align right.self_le_inv Right.self_le_inv
#align right.self_le_neg Right.self_le_neg
end RightLE
section RightLT
variable [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·)] {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem Right.inv_lt_self (h : 1 < a) : a⁻¹ < a :=
(Right.inv_lt_one_iff.mpr h).trans h
#align right.inv_lt_self Right.inv_lt_self
#align right.neg_lt_self Right.neg_lt_self
@[to_additive]
theorem Right.self_lt_inv (h : a < 1) : a < a⁻¹ :=
lt_trans h (Right.one_lt_inv_iff.mpr h)
#align right.self_lt_inv Right.self_lt_inv
#align right.self_lt_neg Right.self_lt_neg
end RightLT
end Preorder
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup α]
section LE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul' : c⁻¹ * a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b * c := by rw [inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
#align inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul' inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul'
#align neg_add_le_iff_le_add' neg_add_le_iff_le_add'
-- Porting note: `simp` simplifies LHS to `a ≤ c * b`
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul' : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c := by
rw [← inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
#align mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul' mul_inv_le_iff_le_mul'
#align add_neg_le_iff_le_add' add_neg_le_iff_le_add'
@[to_additive add_neg_le_add_neg_iff]
theorem mul_inv_le_mul_inv_iff' : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c * d⁻¹ ↔ a * d ≤ c * b := by
rw [mul_comm c, mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff, mul_comm]
#align mul_inv_le_mul_inv_iff' mul_inv_le_mul_inv_iff'
#align add_neg_le_add_neg_iff add_neg_le_add_neg_iff
end LE
section LT
variable [LT α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul' : c⁻¹ * a < b ↔ a < b * c := by rw [inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul, mul_comm]
#align inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul' inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul'
#align neg_add_lt_iff_lt_add' neg_add_lt_iff_lt_add'
-- Porting note: `simp` simplifies LHS to `a < c * b`
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_lt_iff_le_mul' : a * b⁻¹ < c ↔ a < b * c := by
rw [← inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul, mul_comm]
#align mul_inv_lt_iff_le_mul' mul_inv_lt_iff_le_mul'
#align add_neg_lt_iff_le_add' add_neg_lt_iff_le_add'
@[to_additive add_neg_lt_add_neg_iff]
theorem mul_inv_lt_mul_inv_iff' : a * b⁻¹ < c * d⁻¹ ↔ a * d < c * b := by
rw [mul_comm c, mul_inv_lt_inv_mul_iff, mul_comm]
#align mul_inv_lt_mul_inv_iff' mul_inv_lt_mul_inv_iff'
#align add_neg_lt_add_neg_iff add_neg_lt_add_neg_iff
end LT
end CommGroup
alias ⟨one_le_of_inv_le_one, _⟩ := Left.inv_le_one_iff
#align one_le_of_inv_le_one one_le_of_inv_le_one
attribute [to_additive] one_le_of_inv_le_one
#align nonneg_of_neg_nonpos nonneg_of_neg_nonpos
alias ⟨le_one_of_one_le_inv, _⟩ := Left.one_le_inv_iff
#align le_one_of_one_le_inv le_one_of_one_le_inv
attribute [to_additive nonpos_of_neg_nonneg] le_one_of_one_le_inv
#align nonpos_of_neg_nonneg nonpos_of_neg_nonneg
alias ⟨lt_of_inv_lt_inv, _⟩ := inv_lt_inv_iff
#align lt_of_inv_lt_inv lt_of_inv_lt_inv
attribute [to_additive] lt_of_inv_lt_inv
#align lt_of_neg_lt_neg lt_of_neg_lt_neg
alias ⟨one_lt_of_inv_lt_one, _⟩ := Left.inv_lt_one_iff
#align one_lt_of_inv_lt_one one_lt_of_inv_lt_one
attribute [to_additive] one_lt_of_inv_lt_one
#align pos_of_neg_neg pos_of_neg_neg
alias inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt := Left.inv_lt_one_iff
#align inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt
attribute [to_additive] inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt
#align neg_neg_iff_pos neg_neg_iff_pos
alias inv_lt_one' := Left.inv_lt_one_iff
#align inv_lt_one' inv_lt_one'
attribute [to_additive neg_lt_zero] inv_lt_one'
#align neg_lt_zero neg_lt_zero
alias ⟨inv_of_one_lt_inv, _⟩ := Left.one_lt_inv_iff
#align inv_of_one_lt_inv inv_of_one_lt_inv
attribute [to_additive neg_of_neg_pos] inv_of_one_lt_inv
#align neg_of_neg_pos neg_of_neg_pos
alias ⟨_, one_lt_inv_of_inv⟩ := Left.one_lt_inv_iff
#align one_lt_inv_of_inv one_lt_inv_of_inv
attribute [to_additive neg_pos_of_neg] one_lt_inv_of_inv
#align neg_pos_of_neg neg_pos_of_neg
alias ⟨mul_le_of_le_inv_mul, _⟩ := le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le
#align mul_le_of_le_inv_mul mul_le_of_le_inv_mul
attribute [to_additive] mul_le_of_le_inv_mul
#align add_le_of_le_neg_add add_le_of_le_neg_add
alias ⟨_, le_inv_mul_of_mul_le⟩ := le_inv_mul_iff_mul_le
#align le_inv_mul_of_mul_le le_inv_mul_of_mul_le
attribute [to_additive] le_inv_mul_of_mul_le
#align le_neg_add_of_add_le le_neg_add_of_add_le
alias ⟨_, inv_mul_le_of_le_mul⟩ := inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul
#align inv_mul_le_of_le_mul inv_mul_le_of_le_mul
-- Porting note: was `inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul`
attribute [to_additive] inv_mul_le_of_le_mul
alias ⟨mul_lt_of_lt_inv_mul, _⟩ := lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt
#align mul_lt_of_lt_inv_mul mul_lt_of_lt_inv_mul
attribute [to_additive] mul_lt_of_lt_inv_mul
#align add_lt_of_lt_neg_add add_lt_of_lt_neg_add
alias ⟨_, lt_inv_mul_of_mul_lt⟩ := lt_inv_mul_iff_mul_lt
#align lt_inv_mul_of_mul_lt lt_inv_mul_of_mul_lt
attribute [to_additive] lt_inv_mul_of_mul_lt
#align lt_neg_add_of_add_lt lt_neg_add_of_add_lt
alias ⟨lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt, inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul⟩ := inv_mul_lt_iff_lt_mul
#align lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt
#align inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul
attribute [to_additive] lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt
#align lt_add_of_neg_add_lt lt_add_of_neg_add_lt
attribute [to_additive] inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul
#align neg_add_lt_of_lt_add neg_add_lt_of_lt_add
alias lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt_left := lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt
#align lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt_left lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt_left
attribute [to_additive] lt_mul_of_inv_mul_lt_left
#align lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_left lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_left
alias inv_le_one' := Left.inv_le_one_iff
#align inv_le_one' inv_le_one'
attribute [to_additive neg_nonpos] inv_le_one'
#align neg_nonpos neg_nonpos
alias one_le_inv' := Left.one_le_inv_iff
#align one_le_inv' one_le_inv'
attribute [to_additive neg_nonneg] one_le_inv'
#align neg_nonneg neg_nonneg
alias one_lt_inv' := Left.one_lt_inv_iff
#align one_lt_inv' one_lt_inv'
attribute [to_additive neg_pos] one_lt_inv'
#align neg_pos neg_pos
alias OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left' := mul_lt_mul_left'
#align ordered_comm_group.mul_lt_mul_left' OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive OrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left] OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left'
#align ordered_add_comm_group.add_lt_add_left OrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left
alias OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left := le_of_mul_le_mul_left'
#align ordered_comm_group.le_of_mul_le_mul_left OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
#align ordered_add_comm_group.le_of_add_le_add_left OrderedAddCommGroup.le_of_add_le_add_left
alias OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left'
#align ordered_comm_group.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
#align ordered_add_comm_group.lt_of_add_lt_add_left OrderedAddCommGroup.lt_of_add_lt_add_left
-- Most of the lemmas that are primed in this section appear in ordered_field.
-- I (DT) did not try to minimise the assumptions.
section Group
variable [Group α] [LE α]
section Right
variable [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_div_iff_right (c : α) : a / c ≤ b / c ↔ a ≤ b := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using mul_le_mul_iff_right _
#align div_le_div_iff_right div_le_div_iff_right
#align sub_le_sub_iff_right sub_le_sub_iff_right
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sub_le_sub_right]
theorem div_le_div_right' (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
(div_le_div_iff_right c).2 h
#align div_le_div_right' div_le_div_right'
#align sub_le_sub_right sub_le_sub_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp) sub_nonneg]
theorem one_le_div' : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align one_le_div' one_le_div'
#align sub_nonneg sub_nonneg
alias ⟨le_of_sub_nonneg, sub_nonneg_of_le⟩ := sub_nonneg
#align sub_nonneg_of_le sub_nonneg_of_le
#align le_of_sub_nonneg le_of_sub_nonneg
@[to_additive sub_nonpos]
theorem div_le_one' : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align div_le_one' div_le_one'
#align sub_nonpos sub_nonpos
alias ⟨le_of_sub_nonpos, sub_nonpos_of_le⟩ := sub_nonpos
#align sub_nonpos_of_le sub_nonpos_of_le
#align le_of_sub_nonpos le_of_sub_nonpos
@[to_additive]
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le : a ≤ c / b ↔ a * b ≤ c := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right b, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align le_div_iff_mul_le le_div_iff_mul_le
#align le_sub_iff_add_le le_sub_iff_add_le
alias ⟨add_le_of_le_sub_right, le_sub_right_of_add_le⟩ := le_sub_iff_add_le
#align add_le_of_le_sub_right add_le_of_le_sub_right
#align le_sub_right_of_add_le le_sub_right_of_add_le
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_iff_le_mul : a / c ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b * c := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right c, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align div_le_iff_le_mul div_le_iff_le_mul
#align sub_le_iff_le_add sub_le_iff_le_add
-- Note: we intentionally don't have `@[simp]` for the additive version,
-- since the LHS simplifies with `tsub_le_iff_right`
attribute [simp] div_le_iff_le_mul
-- TODO: Should we get rid of `sub_le_iff_le_add` in favor of
-- (a renamed version of) `tsub_le_iff_right`?
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) AddGroup.toHasOrderedSub {α : Type*} [AddGroup α] [LE α]
[CovariantClass α α (swap (· + ·)) (· ≤ ·)] : OrderedSub α :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => sub_le_iff_le_add⟩
#align add_group.to_has_ordered_sub AddGroup.toHasOrderedSub
end Right
section Left
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)]
variable [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_div_iff_left (a : α) : a / b ≤ a / c ↔ c ≤ b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_le_mul_iff_left a⁻¹, inv_mul_cancel_left,
inv_mul_cancel_left, inv_le_inv_iff]
#align div_le_div_iff_left div_le_div_iff_left
#align sub_le_sub_iff_left sub_le_sub_iff_left
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sub_le_sub_left]
theorem div_le_div_left' (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : c / b ≤ c / a :=
(div_le_div_iff_left c).2 h
#align div_le_div_left' div_le_div_left'
#align sub_le_sub_left sub_le_sub_left
end Left
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup α]
section LE
variable [LE α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive sub_le_sub_iff]
theorem div_le_div_iff' : a / b ≤ c / d ↔ a * d ≤ c * b := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using mul_inv_le_mul_inv_iff'
#align div_le_div_iff' div_le_div_iff'
#align sub_le_sub_iff sub_le_sub_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le' : b ≤ c / a ↔ a * b ≤ c := by rw [le_div_iff_mul_le, mul_comm]
#align le_div_iff_mul_le' le_div_iff_mul_le'
#align le_sub_iff_add_le' le_sub_iff_add_le'
alias ⟨add_le_of_le_sub_left, le_sub_left_of_add_le⟩ := le_sub_iff_add_le'
#align le_sub_left_of_add_le le_sub_left_of_add_le
#align add_le_of_le_sub_left add_le_of_le_sub_left
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_iff_le_mul' : a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c := by rw [div_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
#align div_le_iff_le_mul' div_le_iff_le_mul'
#align sub_le_iff_le_add' sub_le_iff_le_add'
alias ⟨le_add_of_sub_left_le, sub_left_le_of_le_add⟩ := sub_le_iff_le_add'
#align sub_left_le_of_le_add sub_left_le_of_le_add
#align le_add_of_sub_left_le le_add_of_sub_left_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_div_iff_le_mul : b⁻¹ ≤ a / c ↔ c ≤ a * b :=
le_div_iff_mul_le.trans inv_mul_le_iff_le_mul'
#align inv_le_div_iff_le_mul inv_le_div_iff_le_mul
#align neg_le_sub_iff_le_add neg_le_sub_iff_le_add
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_le_div_iff_le_mul' : a⁻¹ ≤ b / c ↔ c ≤ a * b := by rw [inv_le_div_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
#align inv_le_div_iff_le_mul' inv_le_div_iff_le_mul'
#align neg_le_sub_iff_le_add' neg_le_sub_iff_le_add'
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_comm : a / b ≤ c ↔ a / c ≤ b :=
div_le_iff_le_mul'.trans div_le_iff_le_mul.symm
#align div_le_comm div_le_comm
#align sub_le_comm sub_le_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem le_div_comm : a ≤ b / c ↔ c ≤ b / a :=
le_div_iff_mul_le'.trans le_div_iff_mul_le.symm
#align le_div_comm le_div_comm
#align le_sub_comm le_sub_comm
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sub_le_sub]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/Defs.lean | 854 | 856 | theorem div_le_div'' (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a / d ≤ b / c := by |
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm b, mul_inv_le_inv_mul_iff, mul_comm]
exact mul_le_mul' hab hcd
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Induced
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.AE
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
#align_import measure_theory.measure.measure_space_def from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
/-!
# Measure spaces
This file defines measure spaces, the almost-everywhere filter and ae_measurable functions.
See `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace` for their properties and for extended documentation.
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the sum of the measures of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, an outer measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
See the documentation of `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace` for ways to construct measures and proving
that two measure are equal.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
This file does not import `MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic`, but only `MeasurableSpace.Defs`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- A measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure. -/
structure Measure (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] extends OuterMeasure α where
m_iUnion ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ : (∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) → Pairwise (Disjoint on f) →
toOuterMeasure (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, toOuterMeasure (f i)
trim_le : toOuterMeasure.trim ≤ toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure MeasureTheory.Measure
theorem Measure.toOuterMeasure_injective [MeasurableSpace α] :
Injective (toOuterMeasure : Measure α → OuterMeasure α)
| ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.to_outer_measure_injective MeasureTheory.Measure.toOuterMeasure_injective
instance Measure.instFunLike [MeasurableSpace α] : FunLike (Measure α) (Set α) ℝ≥0∞ where
coe μ := μ.toOuterMeasure
coe_injective' | ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, h => toOuterMeasure_injective <| DFunLike.coe_injective h
#noalign measure_theory.measure.has_coe_to_fun
set_option linter.deprecated false in -- Not immediately obvious how to use `measure_empty` here.
instance Measure.instOuterMeasureClass [MeasurableSpace α] : OuterMeasureClass (Measure α) α where
measure_empty m := m.empty'
measure_iUnion_nat_le m := m.iUnion_nat
measure_mono m := m.mono
section
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
namespace Measure
theorem trimmed (μ : Measure α) : μ.toOuterMeasure.trim = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
le_antisymm μ.trim_le μ.1.le_trim
/-! ### General facts about measures -/
/-- Obtain a measure by giving a countably additive function that sends `∅` to `0`. -/
def ofMeasurable (m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞) (m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0)
(mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion h) = ∑' i, m (f i) (h i)) :
Measure α :=
{ toOuterMeasure := inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0
m_iUnion := fun f hf hd =>
show inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0 (iUnion f) = ∑' i, inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0 (f i) by
rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU, mU hf hd]
congr; funext n; rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU]
trim_le := le_inducedOuterMeasure.2 fun s hs ↦ by
rw [OuterMeasure.trim_eq _ hs, inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU hs] }
#align measure_theory.measure.of_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.ofMeasurable
theorem ofMeasurable_apply {m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞}
{m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0}
{mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion h) = ∑' i, m (f i) (h i)}
(s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ofMeasurable m m0 mU s = m s hs :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU hs
#align measure_theory.measure.of_measurable_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.ofMeasurable_apply
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s = μ₂ s) : μ₁ = μ₂ :=
toOuterMeasure_injective <| by
rw [← trimmed, OuterMeasure.trim_congr (h _), trimmed]
#align measure_theory.measure.ext MeasureTheory.Measure.ext
theorem ext_iff : μ₁ = μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s = μ₂ s :=
⟨by rintro rfl s _hs; rfl, Measure.ext⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.ext_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_iff
theorem ext_iff' : μ₁ = μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s = μ₂ s :=
⟨by rintro rfl s; rfl, fun h ↦ Measure.ext (fun s _ ↦ h s)⟩
theorem outerMeasure_le_iff {m : OuterMeasure α} : m ≤ μ.1 ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → m s ≤ μ s := by
simpa only [μ.trimmed] using OuterMeasure.le_trim_iff (m₂ := μ.1)
end Measure
@[simp] theorem Measure.coe_toOuterMeasure (μ : Measure α) : ⇑μ.toOuterMeasure = μ := rfl
#align measure_theory.coe_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_toOuterMeasure
theorem Measure.toOuterMeasure_apply (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ.toOuterMeasure s = μ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.to_outer_measure_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.toOuterMeasure_apply
theorem measure_eq_trim (s : Set α) : μ s = μ.toOuterMeasure.trim s := by
rw [μ.trimmed, μ.coe_toOuterMeasure]
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_trim MeasureTheory.measure_eq_trim
theorem measure_eq_iInf (s : Set α) : μ s = ⨅ (t) (_ : s ⊆ t) (_ : MeasurableSet t), μ t := by
rw [measure_eq_trim, OuterMeasure.trim_eq_iInf, μ.coe_toOuterMeasure]
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_infi MeasureTheory.measure_eq_iInf
/-- A variant of `measure_eq_iInf` which has a single `iInf`. This is useful when applying a
lemma next that only works for non-empty infima, in which case you can use
`nonempty_measurable_superset`. -/
theorem measure_eq_iInf' (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = ⨅ t : { t // s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t }, μ t := by
simp_rw [iInf_subtype, iInf_and, ← measure_eq_iInf]
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_infi' MeasureTheory.measure_eq_iInf'
theorem measure_eq_inducedOuterMeasure :
μ s = inducedOuterMeasure (fun s _ => μ s) MeasurableSet.empty μ.empty s :=
measure_eq_trim _
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_induced_outer_measure MeasureTheory.measure_eq_inducedOuterMeasure
theorem toOuterMeasure_eq_inducedOuterMeasure :
μ.toOuterMeasure = inducedOuterMeasure (fun s _ => μ s) MeasurableSet.empty μ.empty :=
μ.trimmed.symm
#align measure_theory.to_outer_measure_eq_induced_outer_measure MeasureTheory.toOuterMeasure_eq_inducedOuterMeasure
theorem measure_eq_extend (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ s = extend (fun t (_ht : MeasurableSet t) => μ t) s := by
rw [extend_eq]
exact hs
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_extend MeasureTheory.measure_eq_extend
theorem nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (h : μ s ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h' => h <| h'.symm ▸ measure_empty
#align measure_theory.nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero MeasureTheory.nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero
theorem measure_mono_top (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₁ : μ s₁ = ∞) : μ s₂ = ∞ :=
top_unique <| h₁ ▸ measure_mono h
#align measure_theory.measure_mono_top MeasureTheory.measure_mono_top
@[simp, mono]
theorem measure_le_measure_union_left : μ s ≤ μ (s ∪ t) := μ.mono subset_union_left
@[simp, mono]
theorem measure_le_measure_union_right : μ t ≤ μ (s ∪ t) := μ.mono subset_union_right
/-- For every set there exists a measurable superset of the same measure. -/
theorem exists_measurable_superset (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = μ s := by
simpa only [← measure_eq_trim] using μ.toOuterMeasure.exists_measurable_superset_eq_trim s
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_superset MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_superset
/-- For every set `s` and a countable collection of measures `μ i` there exists a measurable
superset `t ⊇ s` such that each measure `μ i` takes the same value on `s` and `t`. -/
theorem exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ ∀ i, μ i t = μ i s := by
simpa only [← measure_eq_trim] using
OuterMeasure.exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq_trim (fun i => (μ i).toOuterMeasure) s
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq
theorem exists_measurable_superset₂ (μ ν : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = μ s ∧ ν t = ν s := by
simpa only [Bool.forall_bool.trans and_comm] using
exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq (fun b => cond b μ ν) s
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_superset₂ MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_superset₂
theorem exists_measurable_superset_of_null (h : μ s = 0) : ∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = 0 :=
h ▸ exists_measurable_superset μ s
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_superset_of_null MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_superset_of_null
theorem exists_measurable_superset_iff_measure_eq_zero :
(∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = 0) ↔ μ s = 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_t, hst, _, ht⟩ => measure_mono_null hst ht, exists_measurable_superset_of_null⟩
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_superset_iff_measure_eq_zero MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_superset_iff_measure_eq_zero
theorem measure_biUnion_lt_top {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Finite)
(hfin : ∀ i ∈ s, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) : μ (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) < ∞ := by
convert (measure_biUnion_finset_le (μ := μ) hs.toFinset f).trans_lt _ using 3
· ext
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset]
· apply ENNReal.sum_lt_top; simpa only [Finite.mem_toFinset]
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_lt_top MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_lt_top
@[deprecated measure_iUnion_null_iff (since := "2024-01-14")]
theorem measure_iUnion_null_iff' {ι : Prop} {s : ι → Set α} : μ (⋃ i, s i) = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ (s i) = 0 :=
measure_iUnion_null_iff
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_null_iff' MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_null_iff'
theorem measure_union_lt_top (hs : μ s < ∞) (ht : μ t < ∞) : μ (s ∪ t) < ∞ :=
(measure_union_le s t).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.mpr ⟨hs, ht⟩)
#align measure_theory.measure_union_lt_top MeasureTheory.measure_union_lt_top
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpaceDef.lean | 254 | 257 | theorem measure_union_lt_top_iff : μ (s ∪ t) < ∞ ↔ μ s < ∞ ∧ μ t < ∞ := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h => measure_union_lt_top h.1 h.2⟩
· exact (measure_mono Set.subset_union_left).trans_lt h
· exact (measure_mono Set.subset_union_right).trans_lt h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Basic
#align_import data.list.intervals from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7b78d1776212a91ecc94cf601f83bdcc46b04213"
/-!
# Intervals in ℕ
This file defines intervals of naturals. `List.Ico m n` is the list of integers greater than `m`
and strictly less than `n`.
## TODO
- Define `Ioo` and `Icc`, state basic lemmas about them.
- Also do the versions for integers?
- One could generalise even further, defining 'locally finite partial orders', for which
`Set.Ico a b` is `[Finite]`, and 'locally finite total orders', for which there is a list model.
- Once the above is done, get rid of `Data.Int.range` (and maybe `List.range'`?).
-/
open Nat
namespace List
/-- `Ico n m` is the list of natural numbers `n ≤ x < m`.
(Ico stands for "interval, closed-open".)
See also `Data/Set/Intervals.lean` for `Set.Ico`, modelling intervals in general preorders, and
`Multiset.Ico` and `Finset.Ico` for `n ≤ x < m` as a multiset or as a finset.
-/
def Ico (n m : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
range' n (m - n)
#align list.Ico List.Ico
namespace Ico
theorem zero_bot (n : ℕ) : Ico 0 n = range n := by rw [Ico, Nat.sub_zero, range_eq_range']
#align list.Ico.zero_bot List.Ico.zero_bot
@[simp]
theorem length (n m : ℕ) : length (Ico n m) = m - n := by
dsimp [Ico]
simp [length_range', autoParam]
#align list.Ico.length List.Ico.length
theorem pairwise_lt (n m : ℕ) : Pairwise (· < ·) (Ico n m) := by
dsimp [Ico]
simp [pairwise_lt_range', autoParam]
#align list.Ico.pairwise_lt List.Ico.pairwise_lt
theorem nodup (n m : ℕ) : Nodup (Ico n m) := by
dsimp [Ico]
simp [nodup_range', autoParam]
#align list.Ico.nodup List.Ico.nodup
@[simp]
theorem mem {n m l : ℕ} : l ∈ Ico n m ↔ n ≤ l ∧ l < m := by
suffices n ≤ l ∧ l < n + (m - n) ↔ n ≤ l ∧ l < m by simp [Ico, this]
rcases le_total n m with hnm | hmn
· rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel' hnm]
· rw [Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr hmn, Nat.add_zero]
exact
and_congr_right fun hnl =>
Iff.intro (fun hln => (not_le_of_gt hln hnl).elim) fun hlm => lt_of_lt_of_le hlm hmn
#align list.Ico.mem List.Ico.mem
theorem eq_nil_of_le {n m : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Ico n m = [] := by
simp [Ico, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr h]
#align list.Ico.eq_nil_of_le List.Ico.eq_nil_of_le
theorem map_add (n m k : ℕ) : (Ico n m).map (k + ·) = Ico (n + k) (m + k) := by
rw [Ico, Ico, map_add_range', Nat.add_sub_add_right m k, Nat.add_comm n k]
#align list.Ico.map_add List.Ico.map_add
theorem map_sub (n m k : ℕ) (h₁ : k ≤ n) :
((Ico n m).map fun x => x - k) = Ico (n - k) (m - k) := by
rw [Ico, Ico, Nat.sub_sub_sub_cancel_right h₁, map_sub_range' _ _ _ h₁]
#align list.Ico.map_sub List.Ico.map_sub
@[simp]
theorem self_empty {n : ℕ} : Ico n n = [] :=
eq_nil_of_le (le_refl n)
#align list.Ico.self_empty List.Ico.self_empty
@[simp]
theorem eq_empty_iff {n m : ℕ} : Ico n m = [] ↔ m ≤ n :=
Iff.intro (fun h => Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp <| by rw [← length, h, List.length]) eq_nil_of_le
#align list.Ico.eq_empty_iff List.Ico.eq_empty_iff
theorem append_consecutive {n m l : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) (hml : m ≤ l) :
Ico n m ++ Ico m l = Ico n l := by
dsimp only [Ico]
convert range'_append n (m-n) (l-m) 1 using 2
· rw [Nat.one_mul, Nat.add_sub_cancel' hnm]
· rw [Nat.sub_add_sub_cancel hml hnm]
#align list.Ico.append_consecutive List.Ico.append_consecutive
@[simp]
theorem inter_consecutive (n m l : ℕ) : Ico n m ∩ Ico m l = [] := by
apply eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.2
intro a
simp only [and_imp, not_and, not_lt, List.mem_inter_iff, List.Ico.mem]
intro _ h₂ h₃
exfalso
exact not_lt_of_ge h₃ h₂
#align list.Ico.inter_consecutive List.Ico.inter_consecutive
@[simp]
theorem bagInter_consecutive (n m l : Nat) :
@List.bagInter ℕ instBEqOfDecidableEq (Ico n m) (Ico m l) = [] :=
(bagInter_nil_iff_inter_nil _ _).2 (by convert inter_consecutive n m l)
#align list.Ico.bag_inter_consecutive List.Ico.bagInter_consecutive
@[simp]
theorem succ_singleton {n : ℕ} : Ico n (n + 1) = [n] := by
dsimp [Ico]
simp [range', Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
#align list.Ico.succ_singleton List.Ico.succ_singleton
theorem succ_top {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : Ico n (m + 1) = Ico n m ++ [m] := by
rwa [← succ_singleton, append_consecutive]
exact Nat.le_succ _
#align list.Ico.succ_top List.Ico.succ_top
theorem eq_cons {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) : Ico n m = n :: Ico (n + 1) m := by
rw [← append_consecutive (Nat.le_succ n) h, succ_singleton]
rfl
#align list.Ico.eq_cons List.Ico.eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem pred_singleton {m : ℕ} (h : 0 < m) : Ico (m - 1) m = [m - 1] := by
dsimp [Ico]
rw [Nat.sub_sub_self (succ_le_of_lt h)]
simp [← Nat.one_eq_succ_zero]
#align list.Ico.pred_singleton List.Ico.pred_singleton
theorem chain'_succ (n m : ℕ) : Chain' (fun a b => b = succ a) (Ico n m) := by
by_cases h : n < m
· rw [eq_cons h]
exact chain_succ_range' _ _ 1
· rw [eq_nil_of_le (le_of_not_gt h)]
trivial
#align list.Ico.chain'_succ List.Ico.chain'_succ
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_top {n m : ℕ} : m ∉ Ico n m := by simp
#align list.Ico.not_mem_top List.Ico.not_mem_top
theorem filter_lt_of_top_le {n m l : ℕ} (hml : m ≤ l) :
((Ico n m).filter fun x => x < l) = Ico n m :=
filter_eq_self.2 fun k hk => by
simp only [(lt_of_lt_of_le (mem.1 hk).2 hml), decide_True]
#align list.Ico.filter_lt_of_top_le List.Ico.filter_lt_of_top_le
theorem filter_lt_of_le_bot {n m l : ℕ} (hln : l ≤ n) : ((Ico n m).filter fun x => x < l) = [] :=
filter_eq_nil.2 fun k hk => by
simp only [decide_eq_true_eq, not_lt]
apply le_trans hln
exact (mem.1 hk).1
#align list.Ico.filter_lt_of_le_bot List.Ico.filter_lt_of_le_bot
theorem filter_lt_of_ge {n m l : ℕ} (hlm : l ≤ m) :
((Ico n m).filter fun x => x < l) = Ico n l := by
rcases le_total n l with hnl | hln
· rw [← append_consecutive hnl hlm, filter_append, filter_lt_of_top_le (le_refl l),
filter_lt_of_le_bot (le_refl l), append_nil]
· rw [eq_nil_of_le hln, filter_lt_of_le_bot hln]
#align list.Ico.filter_lt_of_ge List.Ico.filter_lt_of_ge
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Intervals.lean | 178 | 182 | theorem filter_lt (n m l : ℕ) :
((Ico n m).filter fun x => x < l) = Ico n (min m l) := by |
rcases le_total m l with hml | hlm
· rw [min_eq_left hml, filter_lt_of_top_le hml]
· rw [min_eq_right hlm, filter_lt_of_ge hlm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Inv
#align_import analysis.calculus.lhopital from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
/-!
# L'Hôpital's rule for 0/0 indeterminate forms
In this file, we prove several forms of "L'Hôpital's rule" for computing 0/0
indeterminate forms. The proof of `HasDerivAt.lhopital_zero_right_on_Ioo`
is based on the one given in the corresponding
[Wikibooks](https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Calculus/L%27H%C3%B4pital%27s_Rule)
chapter, and all other statements are derived from this one by composing by
carefully chosen functions.
Note that the filter `f'/g'` tends to isn't required to be one of `𝓝 a`,
`atTop` or `atBot`. In fact, we give a slightly stronger statement by
allowing it to be any filter on `ℝ`.
Each statement is available in a `HasDerivAt` form and a `deriv` form, which
is denoted by each statement being in either the `HasDerivAt` or the `deriv`
namespace.
## Tags
L'Hôpital's rule, L'Hopital's rule
-/
open Filter Set
open scoped Filter Topology Pointwise
variable {a b : ℝ} (hab : a < b) {l : Filter ℝ} {f f' g g' : ℝ → ℝ}
/-!
## Interval-based versions
We start by proving statements where all conditions (derivability, `g' ≠ 0`) have
to be satisfied on an explicitly-provided interval.
-/
namespace HasDerivAt
theorem lhopital_zero_right_on_Ioo (hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(hgg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, g' x ≠ 0)
(hfa : Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 0)) (hga : Tendsto g (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 0))
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => f' x / g' x) (𝓝[>] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) (𝓝[>] a) l := by
have sub : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, Ioo a x ⊆ Ioo a b := fun x hx =>
Ioo_subset_Ioo (le_refl a) (le_of_lt hx.2)
have hg : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, g x ≠ 0 := by
intro x hx h
have : Tendsto g (𝓝[<] x) (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← h, ← nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsWithin_Iio hx.1]
exact ((hgg' x hx).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt.mono <| sub x hx).tendsto
obtain ⟨y, hyx, hy⟩ : ∃ c ∈ Ioo a x, g' c = 0 :=
exists_hasDerivAt_eq_zero' hx.1 hga this fun y hy => hgg' y <| sub x hx hy
exact hg' y (sub x hx hyx) hy
have : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, ∃ c ∈ Ioo a x, f x * g' c = g x * f' c := by
intro x hx
rw [← sub_zero (f x), ← sub_zero (g x)]
exact exists_ratio_hasDerivAt_eq_ratio_slope' g g' hx.1 f f' (fun y hy => hgg' y <| sub x hx hy)
(fun y hy => hff' y <| sub x hx hy) hga hfa
(tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds (hgg' x hx).continuousAt.tendsto)
(tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds (hff' x hx).continuousAt.tendsto)
choose! c hc using this
have : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, ((fun x' => f' x' / g' x') ∘ c) x = f x / g x := by
intro x hx
rcases hc x hx with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
field_simp [hg x hx, hg' (c x) ((sub x hx) h₁)]
simp only [h₂]
rw [mul_comm]
have cmp : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, a < c x ∧ c x < x := fun x hx => (hc x hx).1
rw [← nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsWithin_Ioi hab]
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr this
apply hdiv.comp
refine tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _
(tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' tendsto_const_nhds
(tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_id) ?_ ?_) ?_
all_goals
apply eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall
intro x hx
have := cmp x hx
try simp
linarith [this]
#align has_deriv_at.lhopital_zero_right_on_Ioo HasDerivAt.lhopital_zero_right_on_Ioo
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/LHopital.lean | 95 | 104 | theorem lhopital_zero_right_on_Ico (hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(hgg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (hcf : ContinuousOn f (Ico a b))
(hcg : ContinuousOn g (Ico a b)) (hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, g' x ≠ 0) (hfa : f a = 0) (hga : g a = 0)
(hdiv : Tendsto (fun x => f' x / g' x) (𝓝[>] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) (𝓝[>] a) l := by |
refine lhopital_zero_right_on_Ioo hab hff' hgg' hg' ?_ ?_ hdiv
· rw [← hfa, ← nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsWithin_Ioi hab]
exact ((hcf a <| left_mem_Ico.mpr hab).mono Ioo_subset_Ico_self).tendsto
· rw [← hga, ← nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsWithin_Ioi hab]
exact ((hcg a <| left_mem_Ico.mpr hab).mono Ioo_subset_Ico_self).tendsto
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Prod
#align_import algebra.star.star_alg_hom from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"35882ddc66524b6980532a123a4ad4166db34c81"
/-!
# Morphisms of star algebras
This file defines morphisms between `R`-algebras (unital or non-unital) `A` and `B` where both
`A` and `B` are equipped with a `star` operation. These morphisms, namely `StarAlgHom` and
`NonUnitalStarAlgHom` are direct extensions of their non-`star`red counterparts with a field
`map_star` which guarantees they preserve the star operation. We keep the type classes as generic
as possible, in keeping with the definition of `NonUnitalAlgHom` in the non-unital case. In this
file, we only assume `Star` unless we want to talk about the zero map as a
`NonUnitalStarAlgHom`, in which case we need `StarAddMonoid`. Note that the scalar ring `R`
is not required to have a star operation, nor do we need `StarRing` or `StarModule` structures on
`A` and `B`.
As with `NonUnitalAlgHom`, in the non-unital case the multiplications are not assumed to be
associative or unital, or even to be compatible with the scalar actions. In a typical application,
the operations will satisfy compatibility conditions making them into algebras (albeit possibly
non-associative and/or non-unital) but such conditions are not required here for the definitions.
The primary impetus for defining these types is that they constitute the morphisms in the categories
of unital C⋆-algebras (with `StarAlgHom`s) and of C⋆-algebras (with `NonUnitalStarAlgHom`s).
## Main definitions
* `NonUnitalStarAlgHom`
* `StarAlgHom`
## Tags
non-unital, algebra, morphism, star
-/
open EquivLike
/-! ### Non-unital star algebra homomorphisms -/
/-- A *non-unital ⋆-algebra homomorphism* is a non-unital algebra homomorphism between
non-unital `R`-algebras `A` and `B` equipped with a `star` operation, and this homomorphism is
also `star`-preserving. -/
structure NonUnitalStarAlgHom (R A B : Type*) [Monoid R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
[DistribMulAction R A] [Star A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [DistribMulAction R B]
[Star B] extends A →ₙₐ[R] B where
/-- By definition, a non-unital ⋆-algebra homomorphism preserves the `star` operation. -/
map_star' : ∀ a : A, toFun (star a) = star (toFun a)
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom NonUnitalStarAlgHom
@[inherit_doc NonUnitalStarAlgHom] infixr:25 " →⋆ₙₐ " => NonUnitalStarAlgHom _
@[inherit_doc] notation:25 A " →⋆ₙₐ[" R "] " B => NonUnitalStarAlgHom R A B
/-- Reinterpret a non-unital star algebra homomorphism as a non-unital algebra homomorphism
by forgetting the interaction with the star operation. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalStarAlgHom.toNonUnitalAlgHom
/-- `NonUnitalStarAlgHomClass F R A B` asserts `F` is a type of bundled non-unital ⋆-algebra
homomorphisms from `A` to `B`. -/
class NonUnitalStarAlgHomClass (F : Type*) (R A B : outParam Type*)
[Monoid R] [Star A] [Star B] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B]
[DistribMulAction R A] [DistribMulAction R B] [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
extends StarHomClass F A B : Prop
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom_class NonUnitalStarAlgHomClass
namespace NonUnitalStarAlgHomClass
variable {F R A B : Type*} [Monoid R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [DistribMulAction R A] [Star A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [DistribMulAction R B] [Star B]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `NonUnitalStarAlgHomClass F R A B` into an actual
`NonUnitalStarAlgHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B`. -/
@[coe]
def toNonUnitalStarAlgHom [NonUnitalStarAlgHomClass F R A B] (f : F) : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B :=
{ (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) with
map_star' := map_star f }
instance [NonUnitalStarAlgHomClass F R A B] : CoeTC F (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) :=
⟨toNonUnitalStarAlgHom⟩
end NonUnitalStarAlgHomClass
namespace NonUnitalStarAlgHom
section Basic
variable {R A B C D : Type*} [Monoid R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [DistribMulAction R A] [Star A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [DistribMulAction R B] [Star B]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C] [DistribMulAction R C] [Star C]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring D] [DistribMulAction R D] [Star D]
instance : FunLike (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) A B where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' := by rintro ⟨⟨⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨⟨⟨g, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ h; congr
instance : NonUnitalAlgHomClass (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) R A B where
map_smulₛₗ f := f.map_smul'
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_mul f := f.map_mul'
instance : NonUnitalStarAlgHomClass (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) R A B where
map_star f := f.map_star'
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 we didn't need the `Simps.apply` hint.
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.apply (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : A → B := f
initialize_simps_projections NonUnitalStarAlgHom
(toFun → apply)
@[simp]
protected theorem coe_coe {F : Type*} [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
[NonUnitalStarAlgHomClass F R A B] (f : F) :
⇑(f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) = f := rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.coe_coe NonUnitalStarAlgHom.coe_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalAlgHom {f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B} : (f.toNonUnitalAlgHom : A → B) = f :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.coe_to_non_unital_alg_hom NonUnitalStarAlgHom.coe_toNonUnitalAlgHom
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.ext NonUnitalStarAlgHom.ext
/-- Copy of a `NonUnitalStarAlgHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful
to fix definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (f' : A → B) (h : f' = f) : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B where
toFun := f'
map_smul' := h.symm ▸ map_smul f
map_zero' := h.symm ▸ map_zero f
map_add' := h.symm ▸ map_add f
map_mul' := h.symm ▸ map_mul f
map_star' := h.symm ▸ map_star f
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.copy NonUnitalStarAlgHom.copy
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (f' : A → B) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.coe_copy NonUnitalStarAlgHom.coe_copy
theorem copy_eq (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (f' : A → B) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.copy_eq NonUnitalStarAlgHom.copy_eq
-- Porting note: doesn't align with Mathlib 3 because `NonUnitalStarAlgHom.mk` has a new signature
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : A → B) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
((⟨⟨⟨⟨f, h₁⟩, h₂, h₃⟩, h₄⟩, h₅⟩ : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : A → B) = f :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.coe_mk NonUnitalStarAlgHom.coe_mkₓ
-- this is probably the more useful lemma for Lean 4 and should likely replace `coe_mk` above
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk' (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) (h) :
((⟨f, h⟩ : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : A → B) = f :=
rfl
-- Porting note: doesn't align with Mathlib 3 because `NonUnitalStarAlgHom.mk` has a new signature
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨⟨⟨⟨f, h₁⟩, h₂, h₃⟩, h₄⟩, h₅⟩ : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) = f := by
ext
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.mk_coe NonUnitalStarAlgHom.mk_coeₓ
section
variable (R A)
/-- The identity as a non-unital ⋆-algebra homomorphism. -/
protected def id : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A :=
{ (1 : A →ₙₐ[R] A) with map_star' := fun _ => rfl }
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.id NonUnitalStarAlgHom.id
@[simp]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(NonUnitalStarAlgHom.id R A) = id :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.coe_id NonUnitalStarAlgHom.coe_id
end
/-- The composition of non-unital ⋆-algebra homomorphisms, as a non-unital ⋆-algebra
homomorphism. -/
def comp (f : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) (g : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] C :=
{ f.toNonUnitalAlgHom.comp g.toNonUnitalAlgHom with
map_star' := by
simp only [map_star, NonUnitalAlgHom.toFun_eq_coe, eq_self_iff_true, NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_comp,
coe_toNonUnitalAlgHom, Function.comp_apply, forall_const] }
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.comp NonUnitalStarAlgHom.comp
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) (g : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : ⇑(comp f g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.coe_comp NonUnitalStarAlgHom.coe_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) (g : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (a : A) : comp f g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.comp_apply NonUnitalStarAlgHom.comp_apply
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : C →⋆ₙₐ[R] D) (g : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) (h : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.comp_assoc NonUnitalStarAlgHom.comp_assoc
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.id _ _).comp f = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.id_comp NonUnitalStarAlgHom.id_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : f.comp (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.id _ _) = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.comp_id NonUnitalStarAlgHom.comp_id
instance : Monoid (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A) where
mul := comp
mul_assoc := comp_assoc
one := NonUnitalStarAlgHom.id R A
one_mul := id_comp
mul_one := comp_id
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A) : A → A) = id :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.coe_one NonUnitalStarAlgHom.coe_one
theorem one_apply (a : A) : (1 : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A) a = a :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.one_apply NonUnitalStarAlgHom.one_apply
end Basic
section Zero
-- the `zero` requires extra type class assumptions because we need `star_zero`
variable {R A B C D : Type*} [Monoid R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [DistribMulAction R A] [StarAddMonoid A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [DistribMulAction R B] [StarAddMonoid B]
instance : Zero (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) :=
⟨{ (0 : NonUnitalAlgHom (MonoidHom.id R) A B) with map_star' := by simp }⟩
instance : Inhabited (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : MonoidWithZero (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Monoid (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A)),
inferInstanceAs (Zero (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A)) with
zero_mul := fun _ => ext fun _ => rfl
mul_zero := fun f => ext fun _ => map_zero f }
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : A → B) = 0 :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.coe_zero NonUnitalStarAlgHom.coe_zero
theorem zero_apply (a : A) : (0 : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) a = 0 :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.zero_apply NonUnitalStarAlgHom.zero_apply
end Zero
section RestrictScalars
variable (R : Type*) {S A B : Type*} [Monoid R] [Monoid S] [Star A] [Star B]
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [MulAction R S]
[DistribMulAction S A] [DistribMulAction S B] [DistribMulAction R A] [DistribMulAction R B]
[IsScalarTower R S A] [IsScalarTower R S B]
/-- If a monoid `R` acts on another monoid `S`, then a non-unital star algebra homomorphism
over `S` can be viewed as a non-unital star algebra homomorphism over `R`. -/
def restrictScalars (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[S] B) : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B :=
{ (f : A →ₙₐ[S] B).restrictScalars R with
map_star' := map_star f }
@[simp]
lemma restrictScalars_apply (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[S] B) (x : A) : f.restrictScalars R x = f x := rfl
lemma coe_restrictScalars (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[S] B) : (f.restrictScalars R : A →ₙ+* B) = f := rfl
lemma coe_restrictScalars' (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[S] B) : (f.restrictScalars R : A → B) = f := rfl
theorem restrictScalars_injective :
Function.Injective (restrictScalars R : (A →⋆ₙₐ[S] B) → A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ ext (DFunLike.congr_fun h : _)
end RestrictScalars
end NonUnitalStarAlgHom
/-! ### Unital star algebra homomorphisms -/
section Unital
/-- A *⋆-algebra homomorphism* is an algebra homomorphism between `R`-algebras `A` and `B`
equipped with a `star` operation, and this homomorphism is also `star`-preserving. -/
structure StarAlgHom (R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Star A]
[Semiring B] [Algebra R B] [Star B] extends AlgHom R A B where
/-- By definition, a ⋆-algebra homomorphism preserves the `star` operation. -/
map_star' : ∀ x : A, toFun (star x) = star (toFun x)
#align star_alg_hom StarAlgHom
@[inherit_doc StarAlgHom] infixr:25 " →⋆ₐ " => StarAlgHom _
@[inherit_doc] notation:25 A " →⋆ₐ[" R "] " B => StarAlgHom R A B
/-- Reinterpret a unital star algebra homomorphism as a unital algebra homomorphism
by forgetting the interaction with the star operation. -/
add_decl_doc StarAlgHom.toAlgHom
/-- `StarAlgHomClass F R A B` states that `F` is a type of ⋆-algebra homomorphisms.
You should also extend this typeclass when you extend `StarAlgHom`. -/
class StarAlgHomClass (F : Type*) (R A B : outParam Type*)
[CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Star A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B] [Star B]
[FunLike F A B] [AlgHomClass F R A B] extends StarHomClass F A B : Prop
#align star_alg_hom_class StarAlgHomClass
-- Porting note: no longer needed
---- `R` becomes a metavariable but that's fine because it's an `outParam`
--attribute [nolint dangerousInstance] StarAlgHomClass.toStarHomClass
namespace StarAlgHomClass
variable (F R A B : Type*)
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) toNonUnitalStarAlgHomClass {_ : CommSemiring R} {_ : Semiring A}
[Algebra R A] [Star A] {_ : Semiring B} [Algebra R B] [Star B]
[FunLike F A B] [AlgHomClass F R A B] [StarAlgHomClass F R A B] :
NonUnitalStarAlgHomClass F R A B :=
{ }
#align star_alg_hom_class.to_non_unital_star_alg_hom_class StarAlgHomClass.toNonUnitalStarAlgHomClass
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Star A]
variable [Semiring B] [Algebra R B] [Star B] [FunLike F A B] [AlgHomClass F R A B]
variable [StarAlgHomClass F R A B]
variable {F R A B} in
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `StarAlgHomClass F R A B` into an actual
`StarAlgHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `A →⋆ₐ[R] B`. -/
@[coe]
def toStarAlgHom (f : F) : A →⋆ₐ[R] B :=
{ (f : A →ₐ[R] B) with
map_star' := map_star f }
instance : CoeTC F (A →⋆ₐ[R] B) :=
⟨toStarAlgHom⟩
end StarAlgHomClass
namespace StarAlgHom
variable {F R A B C D : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Star A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Star B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] [Star C] [Semiring D] [Algebra R D] [Star D]
instance : FunLike (A →⋆ₐ[R] B) A B where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' := by rintro ⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨g, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ h; congr
instance : AlgHomClass (A →⋆ₐ[R] B) R A B where
map_mul f := f.map_mul'
map_one f := f.map_one'
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
commutes f := f.commutes'
instance : StarAlgHomClass (A →⋆ₐ[R] B) R A B where
map_star f := f.map_star'
@[simp]
protected theorem coe_coe {F : Type*} [FunLike F A B] [AlgHomClass F R A B]
[StarAlgHomClass F R A B] (f : F) :
⇑(f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) = f :=
rfl
#align star_alg_hom.coe_coe StarAlgHom.coe_coe
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 we didn't need the `Simps.apply` hint.
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.apply (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : A → B := f
initialize_simps_projections StarAlgHom (toFun → apply)
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAlgHom {f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B} : (f.toAlgHom : A → B) = f :=
rfl
#align star_alg_hom.coe_to_alg_hom StarAlgHom.coe_toAlgHom
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : A →⋆ₐ[R] B} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
#align star_alg_hom.ext StarAlgHom.ext
/-- Copy of a `StarAlgHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful
to fix definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) (f' : A → B) (h : f' = f) : A →⋆ₐ[R] B where
toFun := f'
map_one' := h.symm ▸ map_one f
map_mul' := h.symm ▸ map_mul f
map_zero' := h.symm ▸ map_zero f
map_add' := h.symm ▸ map_add f
commutes' := h.symm ▸ AlgHomClass.commutes f
map_star' := h.symm ▸ map_star f
#align star_alg_hom.copy StarAlgHom.copy
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) (f' : A → B) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
#align star_alg_hom.coe_copy StarAlgHom.coe_copy
theorem copy_eq (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) (f' : A → B) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
#align star_alg_hom.copy_eq StarAlgHom.copy_eq
-- Porting note: doesn't align with Mathlib 3 because `StarAlgHom.mk` has a new signature
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : A → B) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅ h₆) :
((⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨f, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄⟩, h₅⟩, h₆⟩ : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : A → B) = f :=
rfl
#align star_alg_hom.coe_mk StarAlgHom.coe_mkₓ
-- this is probably the more useful lemma for Lean 4 and should likely replace `coe_mk` above
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk' (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (h) :
((⟨f, h⟩ : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : A → B) = f :=
rfl
-- Porting note: doesn't align with Mathlib 3 because `StarAlgHom.mk` has a new signature
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅ h₆) :
(⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨f, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄⟩, h₅⟩, h₆⟩ : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) = f := by
ext
rfl
#align star_alg_hom.mk_coe StarAlgHom.mk_coeₓ
section
variable (R A)
/-- The identity as a `StarAlgHom`. -/
protected def id : A →⋆ₐ[R] A :=
{ AlgHom.id _ _ with map_star' := fun _ => rfl }
#align star_alg_hom.id StarAlgHom.id
@[simp]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(StarAlgHom.id R A) = id :=
rfl
#align star_alg_hom.coe_id StarAlgHom.coe_id
/-- `algebraMap R A` as a `StarAlgHom` when `A` is a star algebra over `R`. -/
@[simps]
def ofId (R A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [StarRing R] [Semiring A] [StarMul A]
[Algebra R A] [StarModule R A] : R →⋆ₐ[R] A :=
{ Algebra.ofId R A with
toFun := algebraMap R A
map_star' := by simp [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one] }
end
instance : Inhabited (A →⋆ₐ[R] A) :=
⟨StarAlgHom.id R A⟩
/-- The composition of ⋆-algebra homomorphisms, as a ⋆-algebra homomorphism. -/
def comp (f : B →⋆ₐ[R] C) (g : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : A →⋆ₐ[R] C :=
{ f.toAlgHom.comp g.toAlgHom with
map_star' := by
simp only [map_star, AlgHom.toFun_eq_coe, AlgHom.coe_comp, coe_toAlgHom,
Function.comp_apply, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const] }
#align star_alg_hom.comp StarAlgHom.comp
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : B →⋆ₐ[R] C) (g : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : ⇑(comp f g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
#align star_alg_hom.coe_comp StarAlgHom.coe_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : B →⋆ₐ[R] C) (g : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) (a : A) : comp f g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
#align star_alg_hom.comp_apply StarAlgHom.comp_apply
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : C →⋆ₐ[R] D) (g : B →⋆ₐ[R] C) (h : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
#align star_alg_hom.comp_assoc StarAlgHom.comp_assoc
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : (StarAlgHom.id _ _).comp f = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align star_alg_hom.id_comp StarAlgHom.id_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : f.comp (StarAlgHom.id _ _) = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align star_alg_hom.comp_id StarAlgHom.comp_id
instance : Monoid (A →⋆ₐ[R] A) where
mul := comp
mul_assoc := comp_assoc
one := StarAlgHom.id R A
one_mul := id_comp
mul_one := comp_id
/-- A unital morphism of ⋆-algebras is a `NonUnitalStarAlgHom`. -/
def toNonUnitalStarAlgHom (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B :=
{ f with map_smul' := map_smul f }
#align star_alg_hom.to_non_unital_star_alg_hom StarAlgHom.toNonUnitalStarAlgHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalStarAlgHom (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : (f.toNonUnitalStarAlgHom : A → B) = f :=
rfl
#align star_alg_hom.coe_to_non_unital_star_alg_hom StarAlgHom.coe_toNonUnitalStarAlgHom
end StarAlgHom
end Unital
/-! ### Operations on the product type
Note that this is copied from [`Algebra.Hom.NonUnitalAlg`](../Hom/NonUnitalAlg). -/
namespace NonUnitalStarAlgHom
section Prod
variable (R A B C : Type*) [Monoid R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [DistribMulAction R A] [Star A]
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [DistribMulAction R B] [Star B] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C]
[DistribMulAction R C] [Star C]
/-- The first projection of a product is a non-unital ⋆-algebra homomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def fst : A × B →⋆ₙₐ[R] A :=
{ NonUnitalAlgHom.fst R A B with map_star' := fun _ => rfl }
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.fst NonUnitalStarAlgHom.fst
/-- The second projection of a product is a non-unital ⋆-algebra homomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def snd : A × B →⋆ₙₐ[R] B :=
{ NonUnitalAlgHom.snd R A B with map_star' := fun _ => rfl }
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.snd NonUnitalStarAlgHom.snd
variable {R A B C}
/-- The `Pi.prod` of two morphisms is a morphism. -/
@[simps!]
def prod (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (g : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B × C :=
{ f.toNonUnitalAlgHom.prod g.toNonUnitalAlgHom with
map_star' := fun x => by simp [map_star, Prod.star_def] }
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.prod NonUnitalStarAlgHom.prod
theorem coe_prod (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (g : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) : ⇑(f.prod g) = Pi.prod f g :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.coe_prod NonUnitalStarAlgHom.coe_prod
@[simp]
theorem fst_prod (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (g : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) : (fst R B C).comp (prod f g) = f := by
ext; rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.fst_prod NonUnitalStarAlgHom.fst_prod
@[simp]
theorem snd_prod (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (g : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) : (snd R B C).comp (prod f g) = g := by
ext; rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.snd_prod NonUnitalStarAlgHom.snd_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_fst_snd : prod (fst R A B) (snd R A B) = 1 :=
DFunLike.coe_injective Pi.prod_fst_snd
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.prod_fst_snd NonUnitalStarAlgHom.prod_fst_snd
/-- Taking the product of two maps with the same domain is equivalent to taking the product of
their codomains. -/
@[simps]
def prodEquiv : (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) × (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) ≃ (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B × C) where
toFun f := f.1.prod f.2
invFun f := ((fst _ _ _).comp f, (snd _ _ _).comp f)
left_inv f := by ext <;> rfl
right_inv f := by ext <;> rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.prod_equiv NonUnitalStarAlgHom.prodEquiv
end Prod
section InlInr
variable (R A B C : Type*) [Monoid R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [DistribMulAction R A]
[StarAddMonoid A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [DistribMulAction R B] [StarAddMonoid B]
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C] [DistribMulAction R C] [StarAddMonoid C]
/-- The left injection into a product is a non-unital algebra homomorphism. -/
def inl : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A × B :=
prod 1 0
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.inl NonUnitalStarAlgHom.inl
/-- The right injection into a product is a non-unital algebra homomorphism. -/
def inr : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] A × B :=
prod 0 1
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.inr NonUnitalStarAlgHom.inr
variable {R A B}
@[simp]
theorem coe_inl : (inl R A B : A → A × B) = fun x => (x, 0) :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.coe_inl NonUnitalStarAlgHom.coe_inl
theorem inl_apply (x : A) : inl R A B x = (x, 0) :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.inl_apply NonUnitalStarAlgHom.inl_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_inr : (inr R A B : B → A × B) = Prod.mk 0 :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.coe_inr NonUnitalStarAlgHom.coe_inr
theorem inr_apply (x : B) : inr R A B x = (0, x) :=
rfl
#align non_unital_star_alg_hom.inr_apply NonUnitalStarAlgHom.inr_apply
end InlInr
end NonUnitalStarAlgHom
namespace StarAlgHom
variable (R A B C : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Star A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Star B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] [Star C]
/-- The first projection of a product is a ⋆-algebra homomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def fst : A × B →⋆ₐ[R] A :=
{ AlgHom.fst R A B with map_star' := fun _ => rfl }
#align star_alg_hom.fst StarAlgHom.fst
/-- The second projection of a product is a ⋆-algebra homomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def snd : A × B →⋆ₐ[R] B :=
{ AlgHom.snd R A B with map_star' := fun _ => rfl }
#align star_alg_hom.snd StarAlgHom.snd
variable {R A B C}
/-- The `Pi.prod` of two morphisms is a morphism. -/
@[simps!]
def prod (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) (g : A →⋆ₐ[R] C) : A →⋆ₐ[R] B × C :=
{ f.toAlgHom.prod g.toAlgHom with map_star' := fun x => by simp [Prod.star_def, map_star] }
#align star_alg_hom.prod StarAlgHom.prod
theorem coe_prod (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) (g : A →⋆ₐ[R] C) : ⇑(f.prod g) = Pi.prod f g :=
rfl
#align star_alg_hom.coe_prod StarAlgHom.coe_prod
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Star/StarAlgHom.lean | 671 | 672 | theorem fst_prod (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) (g : A →⋆ₐ[R] C) : (fst R B C).comp (prod f g) = f := by |
ext; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Bounded
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
#align_import order.hom.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7581030920af3dcb241d1df0e36f6ec8289dd6be"
/-!
# Lattice homomorphisms
This file defines (bounded) lattice homomorphisms.
We use the `DFunLike` design, so each type of morphisms has a companion typeclass which is meant to
be satisfied by itself and all stricter types.
## Types of morphisms
* `SupHom`: Maps which preserve `⊔`.
* `InfHom`: Maps which preserve `⊓`.
* `SupBotHom`: Finitary supremum homomorphisms. Maps which preserve `⊔` and `⊥`.
* `InfTopHom`: Finitary infimum homomorphisms. Maps which preserve `⊓` and `⊤`.
* `LatticeHom`: Lattice homomorphisms. Maps which preserve `⊔` and `⊓`.
* `BoundedLatticeHom`: Bounded lattice homomorphisms. Maps which preserve `⊤`, `⊥`, `⊔` and `⊓`.
## Typeclasses
* `SupHomClass`
* `InfHomClass`
* `SupBotHomClass`
* `InfTopHomClass`
* `LatticeHomClass`
* `BoundedLatticeHomClass`
## TODO
Do we need more intersections between `BotHom`, `TopHom` and lattice homomorphisms?
-/
open Function OrderDual
variable {F ι α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- The type of `⊔`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure SupHom (α β : Type*) [Sup α] [Sup β] where
/-- The underlying function of a `SupHom` -/
toFun : α → β
/-- A `SupHom` preserves suprema. -/
map_sup' (a b : α) : toFun (a ⊔ b) = toFun a ⊔ toFun b
#align sup_hom SupHom
/-- The type of `⊓`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure InfHom (α β : Type*) [Inf α] [Inf β] where
/-- The underlying function of an `InfHom` -/
toFun : α → β
/-- An `InfHom` preserves infima. -/
map_inf' (a b : α) : toFun (a ⊓ b) = toFun a ⊓ toFun b
#align inf_hom InfHom
/-- The type of finitary supremum-preserving homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. -/
structure SupBotHom (α β : Type*) [Sup α] [Sup β] [Bot α] [Bot β] extends SupHom α β where
/-- A `SupBotHom` preserves the bottom element. -/
map_bot' : toFun ⊥ = ⊥
#align sup_bot_hom SupBotHom
/-- The type of finitary infimum-preserving homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. -/
structure InfTopHom (α β : Type*) [Inf α] [Inf β] [Top α] [Top β] extends InfHom α β where
/-- An `InfTopHom` preserves the top element. -/
map_top' : toFun ⊤ = ⊤
#align inf_top_hom InfTopHom
/-- The type of lattice homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. -/
structure LatticeHom (α β : Type*) [Lattice α] [Lattice β] extends SupHom α β where
/-- A `LatticeHom` preserves infima. -/
map_inf' (a b : α) : toFun (a ⊓ b) = toFun a ⊓ toFun b
#align lattice_hom LatticeHom
/-- The type of bounded lattice homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. -/
structure BoundedLatticeHom (α β : Type*) [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [BoundedOrder α]
[BoundedOrder β] extends LatticeHom α β where
/-- A `BoundedLatticeHom` preserves the top element. -/
map_top' : toFun ⊤ = ⊤
/-- A `BoundedLatticeHom` preserves the bottom element. -/
map_bot' : toFun ⊥ = ⊥
#align bounded_lattice_hom BoundedLatticeHom
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: remove this configuration and use the default configuration.
-- We keep this to be consistent with Lean 3.
initialize_simps_projections SupBotHom (+toSupHom, -toFun)
initialize_simps_projections InfTopHom (+toInfHom, -toFun)
initialize_simps_projections LatticeHom (+toSupHom, -toFun)
initialize_simps_projections BoundedLatticeHom (+toLatticeHom, -toFun)
section
/-- `SupHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⊔`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `SupHom`. -/
class SupHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Sup α] [Sup β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- A `SupHomClass` morphism preserves suprema. -/
map_sup (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b
#align sup_hom_class SupHomClass
/-- `InfHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⊓`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `InfHom`. -/
class InfHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Inf α] [Inf β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- An `InfHomClass` morphism preserves infima. -/
map_inf (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b
#align inf_hom_class InfHomClass
/-- `SupBotHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of finitary supremum-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `SupBotHom`. -/
class SupBotHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Sup α] [Sup β] [Bot α] [Bot β] [FunLike F α β]
extends SupHomClass F α β : Prop where
/-- A `SupBotHomClass` morphism preserves the bottom element. -/
map_bot (f : F) : f ⊥ = ⊥
#align sup_bot_hom_class SupBotHomClass
/-- `InfTopHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of finitary infimum-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `SupBotHom`. -/
class InfTopHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Inf α] [Inf β] [Top α] [Top β] [FunLike F α β]
extends InfHomClass F α β : Prop where
/-- An `InfTopHomClass` morphism preserves the top element. -/
map_top (f : F) : f ⊤ = ⊤
#align inf_top_hom_class InfTopHomClass
/-- `LatticeHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of lattice morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `LatticeHom`. -/
class LatticeHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [FunLike F α β]
extends SupHomClass F α β : Prop where
/-- A `LatticeHomClass` morphism preserves infima. -/
map_inf (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b
#align lattice_hom_class LatticeHomClass
/-- `BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of bounded lattice morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `BoundedLatticeHom`. -/
class BoundedLatticeHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [BoundedOrder α]
[BoundedOrder β] [FunLike F α β] extends LatticeHomClass F α β : Prop where
/-- A `BoundedLatticeHomClass` morphism preserves the top element. -/
map_top (f : F) : f ⊤ = ⊤
/-- A `BoundedLatticeHomClass` morphism preserves the bottom element. -/
map_bot (f : F) : f ⊥ = ⊥
#align bounded_lattice_hom_class BoundedLatticeHomClass
end
export SupHomClass (map_sup)
export InfHomClass (map_inf)
attribute [simp] map_top map_bot map_sup map_inf
section Hom
variable [FunLike F α β]
-- Porting note: changes to the typeclass inference system mean that we need to
-- make a lot of changes here, adding `outParams`, changing `[]`s into `{}` and
-- so on.
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SupHomClass.toOrderHomClass [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β]
[SupHomClass F α β] : OrderHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹SupHomClass F α β› with
map_rel := fun f a b h => by rw [← sup_eq_right, ← map_sup, sup_eq_right.2 h] }
#align sup_hom_class.to_order_hom_class SupHomClass.toOrderHomClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) InfHomClass.toOrderHomClass [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β]
[InfHomClass F α β] : OrderHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹InfHomClass F α β› with
map_rel := fun f a b h => by rw [← inf_eq_left, ← map_inf, inf_eq_left.2 h] }
#align inf_hom_class.to_order_hom_class InfHomClass.toOrderHomClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SupBotHomClass.toBotHomClass [Sup α] [Sup β] [Bot α]
[Bot β] [SupBotHomClass F α β] : BotHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹SupBotHomClass F α β› with }
#align sup_bot_hom_class.to_bot_hom_class SupBotHomClass.toBotHomClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) InfTopHomClass.toTopHomClass [Inf α] [Inf β] [Top α]
[Top β] [InfTopHomClass F α β] : TopHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹InfTopHomClass F α β› with }
#align inf_top_hom_class.to_top_hom_class InfTopHomClass.toTopHomClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LatticeHomClass.toInfHomClass [Lattice α] [Lattice β]
[LatticeHomClass F α β] : InfHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹LatticeHomClass F α β› with }
#align lattice_hom_class.to_inf_hom_class LatticeHomClass.toInfHomClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BoundedLatticeHomClass.toSupBotHomClass [Lattice α] [Lattice β]
[BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] [BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β] :
SupBotHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β› with }
#align bounded_lattice_hom_class.to_sup_bot_hom_class BoundedLatticeHomClass.toSupBotHomClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BoundedLatticeHomClass.toInfTopHomClass [Lattice α] [Lattice β]
[BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] [BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β] :
InfTopHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β› with }
#align bounded_lattice_hom_class.to_inf_top_hom_class BoundedLatticeHomClass.toInfTopHomClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BoundedLatticeHomClass.toBoundedOrderHomClass [Lattice α]
[Lattice β] [BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] [BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β] :
BoundedOrderHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance, ‹BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β› with }
#align bounded_lattice_hom_class.to_bounded_order_hom_class BoundedLatticeHomClass.toBoundedOrderHomClass
end Hom
section Equiv
variable [EquivLike F α β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toSupHomClass [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β]
[OrderIsoClass F α β] : SupHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance with
map_sup := fun f a b =>
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp only [← le_map_inv_iff, sup_le_iff] }
#align order_iso_class.to_sup_hom_class OrderIsoClass.toSupHomClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toInfHomClass [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β]
[OrderIsoClass F α β] : InfHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance with
map_inf := fun f a b =>
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun c => by simp only [← map_inv_le_iff, le_inf_iff] }
#align order_iso_class.to_inf_hom_class OrderIsoClass.toInfHomClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toSupBotHomClass [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α]
[SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : SupBotHomClass F α β :=
{ OrderIsoClass.toSupHomClass, OrderIsoClass.toBotHomClass with }
#align order_iso_class.to_sup_bot_hom_class OrderIsoClass.toSupBotHomClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toInfTopHomClass [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderTop α]
[SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : InfTopHomClass F α β :=
{ OrderIsoClass.toInfHomClass, OrderIsoClass.toTopHomClass with }
#align order_iso_class.to_inf_top_hom_class OrderIsoClass.toInfTopHomClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toLatticeHomClass [Lattice α] [Lattice β]
[OrderIsoClass F α β] : LatticeHomClass F α β :=
{ OrderIsoClass.toSupHomClass, OrderIsoClass.toInfHomClass with }
#align order_iso_class.to_lattice_hom_class OrderIsoClass.toLatticeHomClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toBoundedLatticeHomClass [Lattice α] [Lattice β]
[BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] :
BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β :=
{ OrderIsoClass.toLatticeHomClass, OrderIsoClass.toBoundedOrderHomClass with }
#align order_iso_class.to_bounded_lattice_hom_class OrderIsoClass.toBoundedLatticeHomClass
end Equiv
section OrderEmbedding
variable [FunLike F α β]
/-- We can regard an injective map preserving binary infima as an order embedding. -/
@[simps! apply]
def orderEmbeddingOfInjective [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] (f : F) [InfHomClass F α β]
(hf : Injective f) : α ↪o β :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff f (fun x y ↦ by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ OrderHomClass.mono f h⟩
rwa [← inf_eq_left, ← hf.eq_iff, map_inf, inf_eq_left])
end OrderEmbedding
section BoundedLattice
variable [Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α] [Lattice β] [BoundedOrder β]
variable [FunLike F α β] [BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β]
variable (f : F) {a b : α}
| Mathlib/Order/Hom/Lattice.lean | 291 | 292 | theorem Disjoint.map (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (f a) (f b) := by |
rw [disjoint_iff, ← map_inf, h.eq_bot, map_bot]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Ordered
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.GDelta
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FunctionSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
#align_import topology.urysohns_lemma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Urysohn's lemma
In this file we prove Urysohn's lemma `exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isClosed`: for any two disjoint
closed sets `s` and `t` in a normal topological space `X` there exists a continuous function
`f : X → ℝ` such that
* `f` equals zero on `s`;
* `f` equals one on `t`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
We also give versions in a regular locally compact space where one assumes that `s` is compact
and `t` is closed, in `exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isCompact`
and `exists_continuous_one_zero_of_isCompact` (the latter providing additionally a function with
compact support).
We write a generic proof so that it applies both to normal spaces and to regular locally
compact spaces.
## Implementation notes
Most paper sources prove Urysohn's lemma using a family of open sets indexed by dyadic rational
numbers on `[0, 1]`. There are many technical difficulties with formalizing this proof (e.g., one
needs to formalize the "dyadic induction", then prove that the resulting family of open sets is
monotone). So, we formalize a slightly different proof.
Let `Urysohns.CU` be the type of pairs `(C, U)` of a closed set `C` and an open set `U` such that
`C ⊆ U`. Since `X` is a normal topological space, for each `c : CU` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u ∧ closure u ⊆ c.U`. We define `c.left` and `c.right` to be `(c.C, u)` and
`(closure u, c.U)`, respectively. Then we define a family of functions
`Urysohns.CU.approx (c : Urysohns.CU) (n : ℕ) : X → ℝ` by recursion on `n`:
* `c.approx 0` is the indicator of `c.Uᶜ`;
* `c.approx (n + 1) x = (c.left.approx n x + c.right.approx n x) / 2`.
For each `x` this is a monotone family of functions that are equal to zero on `c.C` and are equal to
one outside of `c.U`. We also have `c.approx n x ∈ [0, 1]` for all `c`, `n`, and `x`.
Let `Urysohns.CU.lim c` be the supremum (or equivalently, the limit) of `c.approx n`. Then
properties of `Urysohns.CU.approx` immediately imply that
* `c.lim x ∈ [0, 1]` for all `x`;
* `c.lim` equals zero on `c.C` and equals one outside of `c.U`;
* `c.lim x = (c.left.lim x + c.right.lim x) / 2`.
In order to prove that `c.lim` is continuous at `x`, we prove by induction on `n : ℕ` that for `y`
in a small neighborhood of `x` we have `|c.lim y - c.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`. Induction base follows
from `c.lim x ∈ [0, 1]`, `c.lim y ∈ [0, 1]`. For the induction step, consider two cases:
* `x ∈ c.left.U`; then for `y` in a small neighborhood of `x` we have `y ∈ c.left.U ⊆ c.right.C`
(hence `c.right.lim x = c.right.lim y = 0`) and `|c.left.lim y - c.left.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`.
Then
`|c.lim y - c.lim x| = |c.left.lim y - c.left.lim x| / 2 ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n / 2 < (3 / 4) ^ (n + 1)`.
* otherwise, `x ∉ c.left.right.C`; then for `y` in a small neighborhood of `x` we have
`y ∉ c.left.right.C ⊇ c.left.left.U` (hence `c.left.left.lim x = c.left.left.lim y = 1`),
`|c.left.right.lim y - c.left.right.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`, and
`|c.right.lim y - c.right.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`. Combining these inequalities, the triangle
inequality, and the recurrence formula for `c.lim`, we get
`|c.lim x - c.lim y| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ (n + 1)`.
The actual formalization uses `midpoint ℝ x y` instead of `(x + y) / 2` because we have more API
lemmas about `midpoint`.
## Tags
Urysohn's lemma, normal topological space, locally compact topological space
-/
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Filter
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Urysohns
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
/-- An auxiliary type for the proof of Urysohn's lemma: a pair of a closed set `C` and its
open neighborhood `U`, together with the assumption that `C` satisfies the property `P C`. The
latter assumption will make it possible to prove simultaneously both versions of Urysohn's lemma,
in normal spaces (with `P` always true) and in locally compact spaces (with `P = IsCompact`).
We put also in the structure the assumption that, for any such pair, one may find an intermediate
pair inbetween satisfying `P`, to avoid carrying it around in the argument. -/
structure CU {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] (P : Set X → Prop) where
/-- The inner set in the inductive construction towards Urysohn's lemma -/
protected C : Set X
/-- The outer set in the inductive construction towards Urysohn's lemma -/
protected U : Set X
protected P_C : P C
protected closed_C : IsClosed C
protected open_U : IsOpen U
protected subset : C ⊆ U
protected hP : ∀ {c u : Set X}, IsClosed c → P c → IsOpen u → c ⊆ u →
∃ v, IsOpen v ∧ c ⊆ v ∧ closure v ⊆ u ∧ P (closure v)
#align urysohns.CU Urysohns.CU
namespace CU
variable {P : Set X → Prop}
/-- By assumption, for each `c : CU P` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u` and `closure u ⊆ c.U`. `c.left` is the pair `(c.C, u)`. -/
@[simps C]
def left (c : CU P) : CU P where
C := c.C
U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose
closed_C := c.closed_C
P_C := c.P_C
open_U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.1
subset := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.1
hP := c.hP
#align urysohns.CU.left Urysohns.CU.left
/-- By assumption, for each `c : CU P` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u` and `closure u ⊆ c.U`. `c.right` is the pair `(closure u, c.U)`. -/
@[simps U]
def right (c : CU P) : CU P where
C := closure (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose
U := c.U
closed_C := isClosed_closure
P_C := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.2
open_U := c.open_U
subset := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.1
hP := c.hP
#align urysohns.CU.right Urysohns.CU.right
theorem left_U_subset_right_C (c : CU P) : c.left.U ⊆ c.right.C :=
subset_closure
#align urysohns.CU.left_U_subset_right_C Urysohns.CU.left_U_subset_right_C
theorem left_U_subset (c : CU P) : c.left.U ⊆ c.U :=
Subset.trans c.left_U_subset_right_C c.right.subset
#align urysohns.CU.left_U_subset Urysohns.CU.left_U_subset
theorem subset_right_C (c : CU P) : c.C ⊆ c.right.C :=
Subset.trans c.left.subset c.left_U_subset_right_C
#align urysohns.CU.subset_right_C Urysohns.CU.subset_right_C
/-- `n`-th approximation to a continuous function `f : X → ℝ` such that `f = 0` on `c.C` and `f = 1`
outside of `c.U`. -/
noncomputable def approx : ℕ → CU P → X → ℝ
| 0, c, x => indicator c.Uᶜ 1 x
| n + 1, c, x => midpoint ℝ (approx n c.left x) (approx n c.right x)
#align urysohns.CU.approx Urysohns.CU.approx
theorem approx_of_mem_C (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) {x : X} (hx : x ∈ c.C) : c.approx n x = 0 := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· exact indicator_of_not_mem (fun (hU : x ∈ c.Uᶜ) => hU <| c.subset hx) _
· simp only [approx]
rw [ihn, ihn, midpoint_self]
exacts [c.subset_right_C hx, hx]
#align urysohns.CU.approx_of_mem_C Urysohns.CU.approx_of_mem_C
theorem approx_of_nmem_U (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) {x : X} (hx : x ∉ c.U) : c.approx n x = 1 := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· rw [← mem_compl_iff] at hx
exact indicator_of_mem hx _
· simp only [approx]
rw [ihn, ihn, midpoint_self]
exacts [hx, fun hU => hx <| c.left_U_subset hU]
#align urysohns.CU.approx_of_nmem_U Urysohns.CU.approx_of_nmem_U
theorem approx_nonneg (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) : 0 ≤ c.approx n x := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· exact indicator_nonneg (fun _ _ => zero_le_one) _
· simp only [approx, midpoint_eq_smul_add, invOf_eq_inv]
refine mul_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 zero_le_two) (add_nonneg ?_ ?_) <;> apply ihn
#align urysohns.CU.approx_nonneg Urysohns.CU.approx_nonneg
theorem approx_le_one (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) : c.approx n x ≤ 1 := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· exact indicator_apply_le' (fun _ => le_rfl) fun _ => zero_le_one
· simp only [approx, midpoint_eq_smul_add, invOf_eq_inv, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
have := add_le_add (ihn (left c)) (ihn (right c))
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
norm_num at this
exact Iff.mpr (div_le_one zero_lt_two) this
#align urysohns.CU.approx_le_one Urysohns.CU.approx_le_one
theorem bddAbove_range_approx (c : CU P) (x : X) : BddAbove (range fun n => c.approx n x) :=
⟨1, fun _ ⟨n, hn⟩ => hn ▸ c.approx_le_one n x⟩
#align urysohns.CU.bdd_above_range_approx Urysohns.CU.bddAbove_range_approx
theorem approx_le_approx_of_U_sub_C {c₁ c₂ : CU P} (h : c₁.U ⊆ c₂.C) (n₁ n₂ : ℕ) (x : X) :
c₂.approx n₂ x ≤ c₁.approx n₁ x := by
by_cases hx : x ∈ c₁.U
· calc
approx n₂ c₂ x = 0 := approx_of_mem_C _ _ (h hx)
_ ≤ approx n₁ c₁ x := approx_nonneg _ _ _
· calc
approx n₂ c₂ x ≤ 1 := approx_le_one _ _ _
_ = approx n₁ c₁ x := (approx_of_nmem_U _ _ hx).symm
#align urysohns.CU.approx_le_approx_of_U_sub_C Urysohns.CU.approx_le_approx_of_U_sub_C
theorem approx_mem_Icc_right_left (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) :
c.approx n x ∈ Icc (c.right.approx n x) (c.left.approx n x) := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· exact ⟨le_rfl, indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (compl_subset_compl.2 c.left_U_subset)
(fun _ => zero_le_one) _⟩
· simp only [approx, mem_Icc]
refine ⟨midpoint_le_midpoint ?_ (ihn _).1, midpoint_le_midpoint (ihn _).2 ?_⟩ <;>
apply approx_le_approx_of_U_sub_C
exacts [subset_closure, subset_closure]
#align urysohns.CU.approx_mem_Icc_right_left Urysohns.CU.approx_mem_Icc_right_left
| Mathlib/Topology/UrysohnsLemma.lean | 221 | 226 | theorem approx_le_succ (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) : c.approx n x ≤ c.approx (n + 1) x := by |
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· simp only [approx, right_U, right_le_midpoint]
exact (approx_mem_Icc_right_left c 0 x).2
· rw [approx, approx]
exact midpoint_le_midpoint (ihn _) (ihn _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.List
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import data.set.countable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1f0096e6caa61e9c849ec2adbd227e960e9dff58"
/-!
# Countable sets
In this file we define `Set.Countable s` as `Countable s`
and prove basic properties of this definition.
Note that this definition does not provide a computable encoding.
For a noncomputable conversion to `Encodable s`, use `Set.Countable.nonempty_encodable`.
## Keywords
sets, countable set
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Function Set Encodable
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x}
namespace Set
/-- A set `s` is countable if the corresponding subtype is countable,
i.e., there exists an injective map `f : s → ℕ`.
Note that this is an abbreviation, so `hs : Set.Countable s` in the proof context
is the same as an instance `Countable s`.
For a constructive version, see `Encodable`.
-/
protected def Countable (s : Set α) : Prop := Countable s
#align set.countable Set.Countable
@[simp]
theorem countable_coe_iff {s : Set α} : Countable s ↔ s.Countable := .rfl
#align set.countable_coe_iff Set.countable_coe_iff
/-- Prove `Set.Countable` from a `Countable` instance on the subtype. -/
theorem to_countable (s : Set α) [Countable s] : s.Countable := ‹_›
#align set.to_countable Set.to_countable
/-- Restate `Set.Countable` as a `Countable` instance. -/
alias ⟨_root_.Countable.to_set, Countable.to_subtype⟩ := countable_coe_iff
#align countable.to_set Countable.to_set
#align set.countable.to_subtype Set.Countable.to_subtype
protected theorem countable_iff_exists_injective {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : s → ℕ, Injective f :=
countable_iff_exists_injective s
#align set.countable_iff_exists_injective Set.countable_iff_exists_injective
/-- A set `s : Set α` is countable if and only if there exists a function `α → ℕ` injective
on `s`. -/
theorem countable_iff_exists_injOn {s : Set α} : s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : α → ℕ, InjOn f s :=
Set.countable_iff_exists_injective.trans exists_injOn_iff_injective.symm
#align set.countable_iff_exists_inj_on Set.countable_iff_exists_injOn
theorem countable_iff_nonempty_encodable {s : Set α} : s.Countable ↔ Nonempty (Encodable s) :=
Encodable.nonempty_encodable.symm
alias ⟨Countable.nonempty_encodable, _⟩ := countable_iff_nonempty_encodable
/-- Convert `Set.Countable s` to `Encodable s` (noncomputable). -/
protected def Countable.toEncodable {s : Set α} (hs : s.Countable) : Encodable s :=
Classical.choice hs.nonempty_encodable
#align set.countable.to_encodable Set.Countable.toEncodable
section Enumerate
/-- Noncomputably enumerate elements in a set. The `default` value is used to extend the domain to
all of `ℕ`. -/
def enumerateCountable {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) (default : α) : ℕ → α := fun n =>
match @Encodable.decode s h.toEncodable n with
| some y => y
| none => default
#align set.enumerate_countable Set.enumerateCountable
theorem subset_range_enumerate {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) (default : α) :
s ⊆ range (enumerateCountable h default) := fun x hx =>
⟨@Encodable.encode s h.toEncodable ⟨x, hx⟩, by
letI := h.toEncodable
simp [enumerateCountable, Encodable.encodek]⟩
#align set.subset_range_enumerate Set.subset_range_enumerate
lemma range_enumerateCountable_subset {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) (default : α) :
range (enumerateCountable h default) ⊆ insert default s := by
refine range_subset_iff.mpr (fun n ↦ ?_)
rw [enumerateCountable]
match @decode s (Countable.toEncodable h) n with
| none => exact mem_insert _ _
| some val => simp
lemma range_enumerateCountable_of_mem {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) {default : α}
(h_mem : default ∈ s) :
range (enumerateCountable h default) = s :=
subset_antisymm ((range_enumerateCountable_subset h _).trans_eq (insert_eq_of_mem h_mem))
(subset_range_enumerate h default)
lemma enumerateCountable_mem {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) {default : α} (h_mem : default ∈ s)
(n : ℕ) :
enumerateCountable h default n ∈ s := by
conv_rhs => rw [← range_enumerateCountable_of_mem h h_mem]
exact mem_range_self n
end Enumerate
theorem Countable.mono {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs : s₂.Countable) : s₁.Countable :=
have := hs.to_subtype; (inclusion_injective h).countable
#align set.countable.mono Set.Countable.mono
theorem countable_range [Countable ι] (f : ι → β) : (range f).Countable :=
surjective_onto_range.countable.to_set
#align set.countable_range Set.countable_range
theorem countable_iff_exists_subset_range [Nonempty α] {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : ℕ → α, s ⊆ range f :=
⟨fun h => by
inhabit α
exact ⟨enumerateCountable h default, subset_range_enumerate _ _⟩, fun ⟨f, hsf⟩ =>
(countable_range f).mono hsf⟩
#align set.countable_iff_exists_subset_range Set.countable_iff_exists_subset_range
/-- A non-empty set is countable iff there exists a surjection from the
natural numbers onto the subtype induced by the set.
-/
protected theorem countable_iff_exists_surjective {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : ℕ → s, Surjective f :=
@countable_iff_exists_surjective s hs.to_subtype
#align set.countable_iff_exists_surjective Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective
alias ⟨Countable.exists_surjective, _⟩ := Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective
#align set.countable.exists_surjective Set.Countable.exists_surjective
theorem countable_univ [Countable α] : (univ : Set α).Countable :=
to_countable univ
#align set.countable_univ Set.countable_univ
theorem countable_univ_iff : (univ : Set α).Countable ↔ Countable α :=
countable_coe_iff.symm.trans (Equiv.Set.univ _).countable_iff
/-- If `s : Set α` is a nonempty countable set, then there exists a map
`f : ℕ → α` such that `s = range f`. -/
theorem Countable.exists_eq_range {s : Set α} (hc : s.Countable) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, s = range f := by
rcases hc.exists_surjective hs with ⟨f, hf⟩
refine ⟨(↑) ∘ f, ?_⟩
rw [hf.range_comp, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.countable.exists_eq_range Set.Countable.exists_eq_range
@[simp] theorem countable_empty : (∅ : Set α).Countable := to_countable _
#align set.countable_empty Set.countable_empty
@[simp] theorem countable_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).Countable := to_countable _
#align set.countable_singleton Set.countable_singleton
theorem Countable.image {s : Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (f : α → β) : (f '' s).Countable := by
rw [image_eq_range]
have := hs.to_subtype
apply countable_range
#align set.countable.image Set.Countable.image
theorem MapsTo.countable_of_injOn {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : MapsTo f s t)
(hf' : InjOn f s) (ht : t.Countable) : s.Countable :=
have := ht.to_subtype
have : Injective (hf.restrict f s t) := (injOn_iff_injective.1 hf').codRestrict _
this.countable
#align set.maps_to.countable_of_inj_on Set.MapsTo.countable_of_injOn
theorem Countable.preimage_of_injOn {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : (f ⁻¹' s).Countable :=
(mapsTo_preimage f s).countable_of_injOn hf hs
#align set.countable.preimage_of_inj_on Set.Countable.preimage_of_injOn
protected theorem Countable.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Countable :=
hs.preimage_of_injOn hf.injOn
#align set.countable.preimage Set.Countable.preimage
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Countable.lean | 193 | 208 | theorem exists_seq_iSup_eq_top_iff_countable [CompleteLattice α] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃ x, p x) :
(∃ s : ℕ → α, (∀ n, p (s n)) ∧ ⨆ n, s n = ⊤) ↔
∃ S : Set α, S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧ sSup S = ⊤ := by |
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hps, hs⟩
refine ⟨range s, countable_range s, forall_mem_range.2 hps, ?_⟩
rwa [sSup_range]
· rintro ⟨S, hSc, hps, hS⟩
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty S with (rfl | hne)
· rw [sSup_empty] at hS
haveI := subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top hS
rcases h with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨fun _ => x, fun _ => hx, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
· rcases (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective hne).1 hSc with ⟨s, hs⟩
refine ⟨fun n => s n, fun n => hps _ (s n).coe_prop, ?_⟩
rwa [hs.iSup_comp, ← sSup_eq_iSup']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Basic
#align_import model_theory.language_map from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b3951c65c6e797ff162ae8b69eab0063bcfb3d73"
/-!
# Language Maps
Maps between first-order languages in the style of the
[Flypitch project](https://flypitch.github.io/), as well as several important maps between
structures.
## Main Definitions
* A `FirstOrder.Language.LHom`, denoted `L →ᴸ L'`, is a map between languages, sending the symbols
of one to symbols of the same kind and arity in the other.
* A `FirstOrder.Language.LEquiv`, denoted `L ≃ᴸ L'`, is an invertible language homomorphism.
* `FirstOrder.Language.withConstants` is defined so that if `M` is an `L.Structure` and
`A : Set M`, `L.withConstants A`, denoted `L[[A]]`, is a language which adds constant symbols for
elements of `A` to `L`.
## References
For the Flypitch project:
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis*]
[flypitch_cpp]
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of
the continuum hypothesis*][flypitch_itp]
-/
universe u v u' v' w w'
namespace FirstOrder
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
namespace Language
open Structure Cardinal
open Cardinal
variable (L : Language.{u, v}) (L' : Language.{u', v'}) {M : Type w} [L.Structure M]
/-- A language homomorphism maps the symbols of one language to symbols of another. -/
structure LHom where
onFunction : ∀ ⦃n⦄, L.Functions n → L'.Functions n
onRelation : ∀ ⦃n⦄, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n
#align first_order.language.Lhom FirstOrder.Language.LHom
@[inherit_doc FirstOrder.Language.LHom]
infixl:10 " →ᴸ " => LHom
-- \^L
variable {L L'}
namespace LHom
/-- Defines a map between languages defined with `Language.mk₂`. -/
protected def mk₂ {c f₁ f₂ : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Type v} (φ₀ : c → L'.Constants)
(φ₁ : f₁ → L'.Functions 1) (φ₂ : f₂ → L'.Functions 2) (φ₁' : r₁ → L'.Relations 1)
(φ₂' : r₂ → L'.Relations 2) : Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂ →ᴸ L' :=
⟨fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n φ₀ fun n => Nat.casesOn n φ₁ fun n => Nat.casesOn n φ₂ fun _ => PEmpty.elim,
fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n PEmpty.elim fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n φ₁' fun n => Nat.casesOn n φ₂' fun _ => PEmpty.elim⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.mk₂ FirstOrder.Language.LHom.mk₂
variable (ϕ : L →ᴸ L')
/-- Pulls a structure back along a language map. -/
def reduct (M : Type*) [L'.Structure M] : L.Structure M where
funMap f xs := funMap (ϕ.onFunction f) xs
RelMap r xs := RelMap (ϕ.onRelation r) xs
#align first_order.language.Lhom.reduct FirstOrder.Language.LHom.reduct
/-- The identity language homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
protected def id (L : Language) : L →ᴸ L :=
⟨fun _n => id, fun _n => id⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.id FirstOrder.Language.LHom.id
instance : Inhabited (L →ᴸ L) :=
⟨LHom.id L⟩
/-- The inclusion of the left factor into the sum of two languages. -/
@[simps]
protected def sumInl : L →ᴸ L.sum L' :=
⟨fun _n => Sum.inl, fun _n => Sum.inl⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_inl FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumInl
/-- The inclusion of the right factor into the sum of two languages. -/
@[simps]
protected def sumInr : L' →ᴸ L.sum L' :=
⟨fun _n => Sum.inr, fun _n => Sum.inr⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_inr FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumInr
variable (L L')
/-- The inclusion of an empty language into any other language. -/
@[simps]
protected def ofIsEmpty [L.IsAlgebraic] [L.IsRelational] : L →ᴸ L' :=
⟨fun n => (IsRelational.empty_functions n).elim, fun n => (IsAlgebraic.empty_relations n).elim⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.of_is_empty FirstOrder.Language.LHom.ofIsEmpty
variable {L L'} {L'' : Language}
@[ext]
protected theorem funext {F G : L →ᴸ L'} (h_fun : F.onFunction = G.onFunction)
(h_rel : F.onRelation = G.onRelation) : F = G := by
cases' F with Ff Fr
cases' G with Gf Gr
simp only [mk.injEq]
exact And.intro h_fun h_rel
#align first_order.language.Lhom.funext FirstOrder.Language.LHom.funext
instance [L.IsAlgebraic] [L.IsRelational] : Unique (L →ᴸ L') :=
⟨⟨LHom.ofIsEmpty L L'⟩, fun _ => LHom.funext (Subsingleton.elim _ _) (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
theorem mk₂_funext {c f₁ f₂ : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Type v} {F G : Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂ →ᴸ L'}
(h0 : ∀ c : (Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).Constants, F.onFunction c = G.onFunction c)
(h1 : ∀ f : (Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).Functions 1, F.onFunction f = G.onFunction f)
(h2 : ∀ f : (Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).Functions 2, F.onFunction f = G.onFunction f)
(h1' : ∀ r : (Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).Relations 1, F.onRelation r = G.onRelation r)
(h2' : ∀ r : (Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).Relations 2, F.onRelation r = G.onRelation r) :
F = G :=
LHom.funext
(funext fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n (funext h0) fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n (funext h1) fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n (funext h2) fun _n => funext fun f => PEmpty.elim f)
(funext fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n (funext fun r => PEmpty.elim r) fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n (funext h1') fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n (funext h2') fun _n => funext fun r => PEmpty.elim r)
#align first_order.language.Lhom.mk₂_funext FirstOrder.Language.LHom.mk₂_funext
/-- The composition of two language homomorphisms. -/
@[simps]
def comp (g : L' →ᴸ L'') (f : L →ᴸ L') : L →ᴸ L'' :=
⟨fun _n F => g.1 (f.1 F), fun _ R => g.2 (f.2 R)⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.comp FirstOrder.Language.LHom.comp
-- Porting note: added ᴸ to avoid clash with function composition
@[inherit_doc]
local infixl:60 " ∘ᴸ " => LHom.comp
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (F : L →ᴸ L') : LHom.id L' ∘ᴸ F = F := by
cases F
rfl
#align first_order.language.Lhom.id_comp FirstOrder.Language.LHom.id_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (F : L →ᴸ L') : F ∘ᴸ LHom.id L = F := by
cases F
rfl
#align first_order.language.Lhom.comp_id FirstOrder.Language.LHom.comp_id
theorem comp_assoc {L3 : Language} (F : L'' →ᴸ L3) (G : L' →ᴸ L'') (H : L →ᴸ L') :
F ∘ᴸ G ∘ᴸ H = F ∘ᴸ (G ∘ᴸ H) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.Lhom.comp_assoc FirstOrder.Language.LHom.comp_assoc
section SumElim
variable (ψ : L'' →ᴸ L')
/-- A language map defined on two factors of a sum. -/
@[simps]
protected def sumElim : L.sum L'' →ᴸ L' where
onFunction _n := Sum.elim (fun f => ϕ.onFunction f) fun f => ψ.onFunction f
onRelation _n := Sum.elim (fun f => ϕ.onRelation f) fun f => ψ.onRelation f
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_elim FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumElim
theorem sumElim_comp_inl (ψ : L'' →ᴸ L') : ϕ.sumElim ψ ∘ᴸ LHom.sumInl = ϕ :=
LHom.funext (funext fun _ => rfl) (funext fun _ => rfl)
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_elim_comp_inl FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumElim_comp_inl
theorem sumElim_comp_inr (ψ : L'' →ᴸ L') : ϕ.sumElim ψ ∘ᴸ LHom.sumInr = ψ :=
LHom.funext (funext fun _ => rfl) (funext fun _ => rfl)
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_elim_comp_inr FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumElim_comp_inr
theorem sumElim_inl_inr : LHom.sumInl.sumElim LHom.sumInr = LHom.id (L.sum L') :=
LHom.funext (funext fun _ => Sum.elim_inl_inr) (funext fun _ => Sum.elim_inl_inr)
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_elim_inl_inr FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumElim_inl_inr
theorem comp_sumElim {L3 : Language} (θ : L' →ᴸ L3) :
θ ∘ᴸ ϕ.sumElim ψ = (θ ∘ᴸ ϕ).sumElim (θ ∘ᴸ ψ) :=
LHom.funext (funext fun _n => Sum.comp_elim _ _ _) (funext fun _n => Sum.comp_elim _ _ _)
#align first_order.language.Lhom.comp_sum_elim FirstOrder.Language.LHom.comp_sumElim
end SumElim
section SumMap
variable {L₁ L₂ : Language} (ψ : L₁ →ᴸ L₂)
/-- The map between two sum-languages induced by maps on the two factors. -/
@[simps]
def sumMap : L.sum L₁ →ᴸ L'.sum L₂ where
onFunction _n := Sum.map (fun f => ϕ.onFunction f) fun f => ψ.onFunction f
onRelation _n := Sum.map (fun f => ϕ.onRelation f) fun f => ψ.onRelation f
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_map FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumMap
@[simp]
theorem sumMap_comp_inl : ϕ.sumMap ψ ∘ᴸ LHom.sumInl = LHom.sumInl ∘ᴸ ϕ :=
LHom.funext (funext fun _ => rfl) (funext fun _ => rfl)
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_map_comp_inl FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumMap_comp_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumMap_comp_inr : ϕ.sumMap ψ ∘ᴸ LHom.sumInr = LHom.sumInr ∘ᴸ ψ :=
LHom.funext (funext fun _ => rfl) (funext fun _ => rfl)
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_map_comp_inr FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumMap_comp_inr
end SumMap
/-- A language homomorphism is injective when all the maps between symbol types are. -/
protected structure Injective : Prop where
onFunction {n} : Function.Injective fun f : L.Functions n => onFunction ϕ f
onRelation {n} : Function.Injective fun R : L.Relations n => onRelation ϕ R
#align first_order.language.Lhom.injective FirstOrder.Language.LHom.Injective
/-- Pulls an `L`-structure along a language map `ϕ : L →ᴸ L'`, and then expands it
to an `L'`-structure arbitrarily. -/
noncomputable def defaultExpansion (ϕ : L →ᴸ L')
[∀ (n) (f : L'.Functions n), Decidable (f ∈ Set.range fun f : L.Functions n => onFunction ϕ f)]
[∀ (n) (r : L'.Relations n), Decidable (r ∈ Set.range fun r : L.Relations n => onRelation ϕ r)]
(M : Type*) [Inhabited M] [L.Structure M] : L'.Structure M where
funMap {n} f xs :=
if h' : f ∈ Set.range fun f : L.Functions n => onFunction ϕ f then funMap h'.choose xs
else default
RelMap {n} r xs :=
if h' : r ∈ Set.range fun r : L.Relations n => onRelation ϕ r then RelMap h'.choose xs
else default
#align first_order.language.Lhom.default_expansion FirstOrder.Language.LHom.defaultExpansion
/-- A language homomorphism is an expansion on a structure if it commutes with the interpretation of
all symbols on that structure. -/
class IsExpansionOn (M : Type*) [L.Structure M] [L'.Structure M] : Prop where
map_onFunction : ∀ {n} (f : L.Functions n) (x : Fin n → M), funMap (ϕ.onFunction f) x = funMap f x
map_onRelation : ∀ {n} (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M),
RelMap (ϕ.onRelation R) x = RelMap R x
#align first_order.language.Lhom.is_expansion_on FirstOrder.Language.LHom.IsExpansionOn
@[simp]
theorem map_onFunction {M : Type*} [L.Structure M] [L'.Structure M] [ϕ.IsExpansionOn M] {n}
(f : L.Functions n) (x : Fin n → M) : funMap (ϕ.onFunction f) x = funMap f x :=
IsExpansionOn.map_onFunction f x
#align first_order.language.Lhom.map_on_function FirstOrder.Language.LHom.map_onFunction
@[simp]
theorem map_onRelation {M : Type*} [L.Structure M] [L'.Structure M] [ϕ.IsExpansionOn M] {n}
(R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M) : RelMap (ϕ.onRelation R) x = RelMap R x :=
IsExpansionOn.map_onRelation R x
#align first_order.language.Lhom.map_on_relation FirstOrder.Language.LHom.map_onRelation
instance id_isExpansionOn (M : Type*) [L.Structure M] : IsExpansionOn (LHom.id L) M :=
⟨fun _ _ => rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.id_is_expansion_on FirstOrder.Language.LHom.id_isExpansionOn
instance ofIsEmpty_isExpansionOn (M : Type*) [L.Structure M] [L'.Structure M] [L.IsAlgebraic]
[L.IsRelational] : IsExpansionOn (LHom.ofIsEmpty L L') M :=
⟨fun {n} => (IsRelational.empty_functions n).elim,
fun {n} => (IsAlgebraic.empty_relations n).elim⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.of_is_empty_is_expansion_on FirstOrder.Language.LHom.ofIsEmpty_isExpansionOn
instance sumElim_isExpansionOn {L'' : Language} (ψ : L'' →ᴸ L') (M : Type*) [L.Structure M]
[L'.Structure M] [L''.Structure M] [ϕ.IsExpansionOn M] [ψ.IsExpansionOn M] :
(ϕ.sumElim ψ).IsExpansionOn M :=
⟨fun f _ => Sum.casesOn f (by simp) (by simp), fun R _ => Sum.casesOn R (by simp) (by simp)⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_elim_is_expansion_on FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumElim_isExpansionOn
instance sumMap_isExpansionOn {L₁ L₂ : Language} (ψ : L₁ →ᴸ L₂) (M : Type*) [L.Structure M]
[L'.Structure M] [L₁.Structure M] [L₂.Structure M] [ϕ.IsExpansionOn M] [ψ.IsExpansionOn M] :
(ϕ.sumMap ψ).IsExpansionOn M :=
⟨fun f _ => Sum.casesOn f (by simp) (by simp), fun R _ => Sum.casesOn R (by simp) (by simp)⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_map_is_expansion_on FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumMap_isExpansionOn
instance sumInl_isExpansionOn (M : Type*) [L.Structure M] [L'.Structure M] :
(LHom.sumInl : L →ᴸ L.sum L').IsExpansionOn M :=
⟨fun _f _ => rfl, fun _R _ => rfl⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_inl_is_expansion_on FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumInl_isExpansionOn
instance sumInr_isExpansionOn (M : Type*) [L.Structure M] [L'.Structure M] :
(LHom.sumInr : L' →ᴸ L.sum L').IsExpansionOn M :=
⟨fun _f _ => rfl, fun _R _ => rfl⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_inr_is_expansion_on FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumInr_isExpansionOn
@[simp]
theorem funMap_sumInl [(L.sum L').Structure M] [(LHom.sumInl : L →ᴸ L.sum L').IsExpansionOn M] {n}
{f : L.Functions n} {x : Fin n → M} : @funMap (L.sum L') M _ n (Sum.inl f) x = funMap f x :=
(LHom.sumInl : L →ᴸ L.sum L').map_onFunction f x
#align first_order.language.Lhom.fun_map_sum_inl FirstOrder.Language.LHom.funMap_sumInl
@[simp]
theorem funMap_sumInr [(L'.sum L).Structure M] [(LHom.sumInr : L →ᴸ L'.sum L).IsExpansionOn M] {n}
{f : L.Functions n} {x : Fin n → M} : @funMap (L'.sum L) M _ n (Sum.inr f) x = funMap f x :=
(LHom.sumInr : L →ᴸ L'.sum L).map_onFunction f x
#align first_order.language.Lhom.fun_map_sum_inr FirstOrder.Language.LHom.funMap_sumInr
theorem sumInl_injective : (LHom.sumInl : L →ᴸ L.sum L').Injective :=
⟨fun h => Sum.inl_injective h, fun h => Sum.inl_injective h⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_inl_injective FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumInl_injective
theorem sumInr_injective : (LHom.sumInr : L' →ᴸ L.sum L').Injective :=
⟨fun h => Sum.inr_injective h, fun h => Sum.inr_injective h⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.sum_inr_injective FirstOrder.Language.LHom.sumInr_injective
instance (priority := 100) isExpansionOn_reduct (ϕ : L →ᴸ L') (M : Type*) [L'.Structure M] :
@IsExpansionOn L L' ϕ M (ϕ.reduct M) _ :=
letI := ϕ.reduct M
⟨fun _f _ => rfl, fun _R _ => rfl⟩
#align first_order.language.Lhom.is_expansion_on_reduct FirstOrder.Language.LHom.isExpansionOn_reduct
theorem Injective.isExpansionOn_default {ϕ : L →ᴸ L'}
[∀ (n) (f : L'.Functions n), Decidable (f ∈ Set.range fun f : L.Functions n => ϕ.onFunction f)]
[∀ (n) (r : L'.Relations n), Decidable (r ∈ Set.range fun r : L.Relations n => ϕ.onRelation r)]
(h : ϕ.Injective) (M : Type*) [Inhabited M] [L.Structure M] :
@IsExpansionOn L L' ϕ M _ (ϕ.defaultExpansion M) := by
letI := ϕ.defaultExpansion M
refine ⟨fun {n} f xs => ?_, fun {n} r xs => ?_⟩
· have hf : ϕ.onFunction f ∈ Set.range fun f : L.Functions n => ϕ.onFunction f := ⟨f, rfl⟩
refine (dif_pos hf).trans ?_
rw [h.onFunction hf.choose_spec]
· have hr : ϕ.onRelation r ∈ Set.range fun r : L.Relations n => ϕ.onRelation r := ⟨r, rfl⟩
refine (dif_pos hr).trans ?_
rw [h.onRelation hr.choose_spec]
#align first_order.language.Lhom.injective.is_expansion_on_default FirstOrder.Language.LHom.Injective.isExpansionOn_default
end LHom
/-- A language equivalence maps the symbols of one language to symbols of another bijectively. -/
structure LEquiv (L L' : Language) where
toLHom : L →ᴸ L'
invLHom : L' →ᴸ L
left_inv : invLHom.comp toLHom = LHom.id L
right_inv : toLHom.comp invLHom = LHom.id L'
#align first_order.lanugage.Lequiv FirstOrder.Language.LEquiv
infixl:10 " ≃ᴸ " => LEquiv
-- \^L
namespace LEquiv
variable (L)
/-- The identity equivalence from a first-order language to itself. -/
@[simps]
protected def refl : L ≃ᴸ L :=
⟨LHom.id L, LHom.id L, LHom.comp_id _, LHom.comp_id _⟩
#align first_order.lanugage.Lequiv.refl FirstOrder.Language.LEquiv.refl
variable {L}
instance : Inhabited (L ≃ᴸ L) :=
⟨LEquiv.refl L⟩
variable {L'' : Language} (e' : L' ≃ᴸ L'') (e : L ≃ᴸ L')
/-- The inverse of an equivalence of first-order languages. -/
@[simps]
protected def symm : L' ≃ᴸ L :=
⟨e.invLHom, e.toLHom, e.right_inv, e.left_inv⟩
#align first_order.lanugage.Lequiv.symm FirstOrder.Language.LEquiv.symm
/-- The composition of equivalences of first-order languages. -/
@[simps, trans]
protected def trans (e : L ≃ᴸ L') (e' : L' ≃ᴸ L'') : L ≃ᴸ L'' :=
⟨e'.toLHom.comp e.toLHom, e.invLHom.comp e'.invLHom, by
rw [LHom.comp_assoc, ← LHom.comp_assoc e'.invLHom, e'.left_inv, LHom.id_comp, e.left_inv], by
rw [LHom.comp_assoc, ← LHom.comp_assoc e.toLHom, e.right_inv, LHom.id_comp, e'.right_inv]⟩
#align first_order.lanugage.Lequiv.trans FirstOrder.Language.LEquiv.trans
end LEquiv
section ConstantsOn
variable (α : Type u')
/-- A language with constants indexed by a type. -/
@[simp]
def constantsOn : Language.{u', 0} :=
Language.mk₂ α PEmpty PEmpty PEmpty PEmpty
#align first_order.language.constants_on FirstOrder.Language.constantsOn
variable {α}
theorem constantsOn_constants : (constantsOn α).Constants = α :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.constants_on_constants FirstOrder.Language.constantsOn_constants
instance isAlgebraic_constantsOn : IsAlgebraic (constantsOn α) :=
Language.isAlgebraic_mk₂
#align first_order.language.is_algebraic_constants_on FirstOrder.Language.isAlgebraic_constantsOn
instance isRelational_constantsOn [_ie : IsEmpty α] : IsRelational (constantsOn α) :=
Language.isRelational_mk₂
#align first_order.language.is_relational_constants_on FirstOrder.Language.isRelational_constantsOn
instance isEmpty_functions_constantsOn_succ {n : ℕ} : IsEmpty ((constantsOn α).Functions (n + 1)) :=
Nat.casesOn n (inferInstanceAs (IsEmpty PEmpty))
fun n => Nat.casesOn n (inferInstanceAs (IsEmpty PEmpty))
fun _ => (inferInstanceAs (IsEmpty PEmpty))
#align first_order.language.is_empty_functions_constants_on_succ FirstOrder.Language.isEmpty_functions_constantsOn_succ
theorem card_constantsOn : (constantsOn α).card = #α := by simp
#align first_order.language.card_constants_on FirstOrder.Language.card_constantsOn
/-- Gives a `constantsOn α` structure to a type by assigning each constant a value. -/
def constantsOn.structure (f : α → M) : (constantsOn α).Structure M :=
Structure.mk₂ f PEmpty.elim PEmpty.elim PEmpty.elim PEmpty.elim
#align first_order.language.constants_on.Structure FirstOrder.Language.constantsOn.structure
variable {β : Type v'}
/-- A map between index types induces a map between constant languages. -/
def LHom.constantsOnMap (f : α → β) : constantsOn α →ᴸ constantsOn β :=
LHom.mk₂ f PEmpty.elim PEmpty.elim PEmpty.elim PEmpty.elim
#align first_order.language.Lhom.constants_on_map FirstOrder.Language.LHom.constantsOnMap
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/LanguageMap.lean | 426 | 433 | theorem constantsOnMap_isExpansionOn {f : α → β} {fα : α → M} {fβ : β → M} (h : fβ ∘ f = fα) :
@LHom.IsExpansionOn _ _ (LHom.constantsOnMap f) M (constantsOn.structure fα)
(constantsOn.structure fβ) := by |
letI := constantsOn.structure fα
letI := constantsOn.structure fβ
exact
⟨fun {n} => Nat.casesOn n (fun F _x => (congr_fun h F : _)) fun n F => isEmptyElim F, fun R =>
isEmptyElim R⟩
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.