File size: 11,199 Bytes
b381c58 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 | <!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>Reproduction poster - Incentivized Exploration with Stochastic Covariates</title>
<style>
@page { size: 24in 16in; margin: 0; }
:root {
/* ===== DESIGN TOKENS ===== */
--u: 1.6px;
--accent: #2D5F8B;
--accent-deep: #1F4566;
--accent-light: #E8F1F8;
--gold: #B8872D;
--gold-deep: #7A4C00;
--gold-soft: #FFF4DC;
--bad: #B33A3A;
--bad-soft: #FBE7E7;
--good: #18744C;
--good-soft: #E3F5EB;
--text: #1A1A1A;
--muted: #5C6470;
--line: #D5DCE4;
--bg: #F6F2F0;
--bg-screen: #2B2B2B;
--card: #FFFFFF;
--subtle: #F8FAFC;
--shadow-card: rgba(45, 95, 139, 0.07);
--fs-1: calc(9 * var(--u));
--fs-2: calc(10 * var(--u));
--fs-3: calc(11 * var(--u));
--fs-4: calc(12 * var(--u));
--fs-5: calc(14 * var(--u));
--fs-6: calc(16 * var(--u));
--fs-7: calc(22 * var(--u));
--fs-8: calc(28 * var(--u));
--font-sans: Inter, Arial, sans-serif;
--font-serif: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;
/* ===== END DESIGN TOKENS ===== */
}
* { box-sizing: border-box; }
html, body { margin: 0; background: var(--bg-screen); color: var(--text); }
body { font-family: var(--font-serif); }
.poster {
width: calc(610 * var(--u));
height: calc(406 * var(--u));
margin: 20px auto;
padding: calc(13 * var(--u));
background: var(--bg);
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: auto 1fr auto;
gap: calc(7 * var(--u));
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
}
.poster::before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
top: 0; left: 0; right: 0;
height: calc(7 * var(--u));
background: var(--accent);
}
.header {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 3fr 1fr;
gap: calc(10 * var(--u));
align-items: end;
border-bottom: calc(2 * var(--u)) solid var(--accent);
padding: calc(6 * var(--u)) 0 calc(6 * var(--u));
}
.tag {
font-family: var(--font-sans);
font-size: var(--fs-3);
color: var(--accent-deep);
text-transform: uppercase;
letter-spacing: 0;
font-weight: 700;
}
.title h1 {
font-family: var(--font-sans);
font-size: var(--fs-8);
line-height: 1.03;
text-align: center;
margin: 0;
}
.title p {
margin: calc(3 * var(--u)) 0 0;
text-align: center;
font-size: var(--fs-3);
color: var(--muted);
}
.right-note {
text-align: right;
font-family: var(--font-sans);
font-size: var(--fs-3);
color: var(--muted);
}
.body {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
gap: calc(7 * var(--u));
min-height: 0;
}
.column {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
gap: calc(7 * var(--u));
min-height: 0;
}
.card {
background: var(--card);
border: calc(1 * var(--u)) solid var(--line);
border-left: calc(4 * var(--u)) solid var(--accent);
padding: calc(7 * var(--u));
box-shadow: 0 calc(1 * var(--u)) calc(4 * var(--u)) var(--shadow-card);
}
.column:first-child .card { padding-bottom: calc(8.7 * var(--u)); }
.column:nth-child(2) .card:last-child { padding-bottom: calc(8.8 * var(--u)); }
.card h2 {
font-family: var(--font-sans);
font-size: var(--fs-6);
line-height: 1.12;
margin: 0 0 calc(4 * var(--u));
}
.verdict {
display: inline-block;
font-family: var(--font-sans);
font-size: var(--fs-2);
font-weight: 800;
padding: calc(1 * var(--u)) calc(4 * var(--u));
margin-bottom: calc(4 * var(--u));
border-radius: calc(3 * var(--u));
}
.fail { color: var(--bad); background: var(--bad-soft); }
.pass { color: var(--good); background: var(--good-soft); }
.mixed { color: var(--gold-deep); background: var(--gold-soft); }
p, li {
font-size: var(--fs-4);
line-height: 1.34;
margin: 0 0 calc(3 * var(--u));
}
ul { margin: 0; padding-left: calc(9 * var(--u)); }
table {
width: 100%;
border-collapse: collapse;
margin-top: calc(4 * var(--u));
font-size: var(--fs-3);
}
th, td {
border-bottom: calc(0.7 * var(--u)) solid var(--line);
padding: calc(2.4 * var(--u)) calc(2 * var(--u));
text-align: left;
}
th {
font-family: var(--font-sans);
color: var(--accent-deep);
background: var(--accent-light);
}
.metric-row {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr);
gap: calc(4 * var(--u));
margin-top: calc(4 * var(--u));
}
.metric {
background: var(--subtle);
border: calc(1 * var(--u)) solid var(--line);
padding: calc(4 * var(--u));
}
.metric b {
display: block;
font-family: var(--font-sans);
font-size: var(--fs-6);
color: var(--accent-deep);
}
.metric span {
display: block;
font-size: var(--fs-2);
color: var(--muted);
}
.footer {
border-top: calc(2 * var(--u)) solid var(--accent);
padding-top: calc(4 * var(--u));
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 2fr 1fr;
gap: calc(8 * var(--u));
font-size: var(--fs-3);
color: var(--muted);
}
.footer b { color: var(--text); }
@media print {
html, body { background: white; }
.poster { margin: 0; box-shadow: none; --u: 1mm; }
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<main class="poster" data-measure-role="poster">
<header class="header" data-measure-role="header">
<div class="tag">ICML 2026 Reproduction</div>
<div class="title">
<h1>Incentivized Exploration with Stochastic Covariates</h1>
<p>A two-stage RCB mechanism: executable theory checks, synthetic bandits, and warfarin dosing</p>
</div>
<div class="right-note">OpenReview LTHHiPNbrs<br>arXiv 2406.04374</div>
</header>
<section class="body" data-measure-role="body">
<div class="column" data-measure-role="column">
<article class="card" data-measure-role="card" data-logbook-target="claim-1-rcb-regret-is-o-sqrt-kdt" data-logbook-label="Claim 1: regret rate">
<span class="verdict fail">Claim 1 falsified</span>
<h2>√T and √d show up; √K does not</h2>
<p>The proof's learning term has the closed-form rate, but the measured arm dependence is too steep.</p>
<table>
<tr><th>Rate / check</th><th>Measured</th><th>Claim</th></tr>
<tr><td>T exponent</td><td>0.450-0.570</td><td>0.500</td></tr>
<tr><td>d exponent</td><td>0.396</td><td>0.500</td></tr>
<tr><td>K exponent</td><td>1.322 raw, 0.819 normalized</td><td>0.500</td></tr>
<tr><td>Eq. E.30 bound</td><td>150/150 points satisfied</td><td>upper bound</td></tr>
</table>
</article>
<article class="card" data-measure-role="card" data-logbook-target="claim-2-epsilon-dbic-requires-cold-start-size-scaling-as-k-cubed-times-d" data-logbook-label="Claim 2: epsilon DBIC">
<span class="verdict fail">Claim 2 partly falsified</span>
<h2>K cubed is exact; "linear in d" is not in the paper's regime</h2>
<p>Theorem 1 gives exact K^3, inverse-quadratic budget, and phi0^-1 scaling. At sigma=0.05, dimension barely changes N.</p>
<table>
<tr><th>Dependency</th><th>Measured exponent</th></tr>
<tr><td>K</td><td>3.000</td></tr>
<tr><td>d over 2-200</td><td>0.079</td></tr>
<tr><td>tau + epsilon</td><td>-2.000</td></tr>
<tr><td>phi0</td><td>-1.000</td></tr>
</table>
<p>Literal N(epsilon) also makes the cold start longer than every reported experiment: 1.5x to 3.7 million x the horizon.</p>
</article>
<article class="card" data-measure-role="card" data-logbook-target="claim-3-two-stage-cold-start-exploitation-mechanism-with-ipgs" data-logbook-label="Claim 3: two-stage mechanism">
<span class="verdict pass">Claim 3 verified</span>
<h2>The mechanism structure reproduces</h2>
<p>Fourteen checks on Algorithms 1-2 passed: MPASC to RASC cold start, organic pulls excluded from sample counts, every arm saturated before Stage 2, and IPGS is a valid probability kernel.</p>
<div class="metric-row">
<div class="metric"><b>14/14</b><span>structure checks</span></div>
<div class="metric"><b>0.1226</b><span>RASC frequency vs 0.125</span></div>
<div class="metric"><b>1.042</b><span>cold-start K exponent</span></div>
</div>
</article>
</div>
<div class="column" data-measure-role="column">
<article class="card" data-measure-role="card" data-logbook-target="claim-4-epsilon-budget-trades-off-cold-start-size-and-regret" data-logbook-label="Claim 4: epsilon tradeoff">
<span class="verdict pass">Claim 4 verified</span>
<h2>Larger epsilon buys shorter cold starts</h2>
<p>Setting 3 reproduces the predicted direction: relaxing the incentive budget lowers N, shortens the cold-start period, and lowers regret, while DBIC satisfaction becomes less exact.</p>
<p>This is the paper's real tradeoff: incentives are bought with exploration rounds, not obtained for free.</p>
<table>
<tr><th>epsilon</th><th>N</th><th>T_cold</th><th>Regret</th><th>DBIC frac.</th></tr>
<tr><td>0.01</td><td>1582</td><td>50000</td><td>11188</td><td>1.000</td></tr>
<tr><td>0.03</td><td>396</td><td>40962</td><td>5302</td><td>0.988</td></tr>
<tr><td>0.05</td><td>176</td><td>11756</td><td>1714</td><td>0.956</td></tr>
</table>
</article>
<article class="card" data-measure-role="card" data-logbook-target="claim-5-warfarin-simulations-reproduce-reported-risk-and-error-rates" data-logbook-label="Claim 5: warfarin">
<span class="verdict fail">Claim 5 falsified on score</span>
<h2>Warfarin error rate is close; weighted score is not</h2>
<p>The full 5528-patient grid reproduces broad error rates but not the headline RCB weighted risk score. With actual prevalences the physician baseline is 0.224; using the paper's rounded prevalence gives 0.200.</p>
<table>
<tr><th>Policy</th><th>Error</th><th>Weighted score</th></tr>
<tr><td>Physician</td><td>0.388</td><td>0.224 actual / 0.200 rounded</td></tr>
<tr><td>RCB eps=0.025</td><td>0.384</td><td>0.232</td></tr>
<tr><td>RCB eps=0.035</td><td>0.378</td><td>0.245</td></tr>
<tr><td>RCB eps=0.045</td><td>0.377</td><td>0.245</td></tr>
<tr><td>Offline oracle</td><td>0.324</td><td>0.352</td></tr>
</table>
</article>
<article class="card" data-measure-role="card" data-logbook-target="conclusion" data-logbook-label="Bundle and rerun">
<span class="verdict mixed">Scope and cost</span>
<h2>Independent CPU-scale reproduction bundle</h2>
<ul>
<li>19 executable theorem checks, 14 mechanism checks, 150 regret simulations, and 90 warfarin runs.</li>
<li>One HF CPU Job smoke check: Theorem 1 exponents K=3.000, d=0.079, epsilon=-2.000.</li>
<li>No official code was released; implementation follows the paper pseudocode and appendices.</li>
</ul>
</article>
</div>
</section>
<footer class="footer" data-measure-role="footer">
<div><b>Outcome:</b> Claims 1, 2, and 5 fail in important quantified ways; Claim 3 and Claim 4 reproduce. All scripts, logs, data, and figures are bundled for rerun.</div>
<div><b>Cost:</b> local CPU, about 5 minutes of logged runs in this session plus one cpu-basic HF Job smoke check.</div>
</footer>
</main>
</body>
</html>
|