File size: 12,313 Bytes
b381c58 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 | """Executable re-derivation of the lemma chain behind Theorem 2 (Claim 1) and
Theorem 1 (Claim 2). Every step is an assertion; the script exits non-zero on failure.
Chain verified:
Lemma 7 sum_pi Q_m(pi) Reg_hat_t(pi) < (K-1)/gamma_m [IPGS kernel identity]
Cor. 1 E[(x'beta_hat - x'beta)^2] = Theta(sigma^2 d / n) [ridge, random design]
Lemma 11 R(T) <= tau_{m0-1} + 206 K sum_t 1/gamma_m(t) + Azuma
Eq. E.30 206 K sum_t 1/gamma_m(t) = Theta(sigma sqrt(K d T))
Thm 1 N(eps) ~ K^3 d / (phi0 (tau+eps)^2); L(eps) = 1 + (1-eps)/(tau rho + eps)
"""
import json, sys, os
import numpy as np
os.chdir(os.path.abspath(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), "..")))
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), ".."))
from rcb.core import ipgs, EF_ridge, N_eps, L_eps, m0_eps
RES = {}
FAIL = []
def check(name, cond, detail=""):
(RES.setdefault("checks", {}))[name] = {"pass": bool(cond), "detail": detail}
print(f"[{'PASS' if cond else 'FAIL'}] {name} {detail}")
if not cond:
FAIL.append(name)
def loglog_slope(xs, ys):
return float(np.polyfit(np.log(xs), np.log(ys), 1)[0])
# ---------------------------------------------------------------- Lemma 7
def lemma7():
"""sum_{a != b} p_t(a) (mu_hat(b) - mu_hat(a)) < (K-1)/gamma, for the IPGS kernel.
Proof step (E.12): each term is (1/gamma) * [gamma*Delta / (K + gamma*Delta)] < 1/gamma.
"""
rng = np.random.default_rng(0)
worst = -np.inf
for _ in range(200000):
K = int(rng.integers(2, 12))
gamma = float(10 ** rng.uniform(-1, 4))
mu = rng.normal(size=K)
p, b = ipgs(mu, gamma)
lhs = float(sum(p[a] * (mu[b] - mu[a]) for a in range(K) if a != b))
worst = max(worst, lhs * gamma / (K - 1))
if p[b] < 0: # kernel must stay a valid distribution
check("lemma7-valid-kernel", False, f"p(b)={p[b]}")
return
check("Lemma 7: sum_a p(a)(mu_b - mu_a) < (K-1)/gamma", worst < 1.0,
f"sup over 2e5 random (K,gamma,mu_hat) of LHS*gamma/(K-1) = {worst:.6f} < 1")
RES["lemma7_sup_ratio"] = worst
# ---------------------------------------------------------------- Corollary 1
def corollary1():
"""Excess prediction risk of ridge with random design.
The sharp identity is E_x[(x'beta_hat - x'beta)^2] = ||beta_hat - beta||^2_Sigma;
Lemma 1 + Lemma 2 bound its expectation by ~ sigma^2 Tr[(Sigma+lam)^{-1}Sigma]/n
+ lam||beta||^2, i.e. Theta(sigma^2 d / n). We measure the exponents in d, n, sigma.
"""
rng = np.random.default_rng(1)
def risk(n, d, sigma, reps=200, lam=1e-6):
out = []
Sigma = np.eye(d)
for _ in range(reps):
beta = rng.normal(size=d) / np.sqrt(d)
X = rng.normal(size=(n, d))
y = X @ beta + sigma * rng.normal(size=n)
bh = np.linalg.solve(X.T @ X + lam * np.eye(d), X.T @ y)
out.append(float((bh - beta) @ Sigma @ (bh - beta)))
return float(np.mean(out))
ns = np.array([200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200])
s_n = loglog_slope(ns, [risk(n, 10, 0.1) for n in ns])
check("Corollary 1: excess risk ~ n^-1", abs(s_n + 1.0) < 0.06,
f"fitted exponent in n = {s_n:.3f} (theory -1)")
ds = np.array([4, 8, 16, 32, 64])
s_d = loglog_slope(ds, [risk(4000, d, 0.1) for d in ds])
check("Corollary 1: excess risk ~ d^+1", abs(s_d - 1.0) < 0.06,
f"fitted exponent in d = {s_d:.3f} (theory +1)")
ss = np.array([0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4])
s_s = loglog_slope(ss, [risk(2000, 10, s) for s in ss])
check("Corollary 1: excess risk ~ sigma^+2", abs(s_s - 2.0) < 0.06,
f"fitted exponent in sigma = {s_s:.3f} (theory +2)")
RES["corollary1_exponents"] = dict(n=s_n, d=s_d, sigma=s_s)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------- Eq. E.29 / E.30
def regret_sum(T, K, d, sigma, phi0=1.0, N=1.0, c3=1.0, gamma_const=4.0, C0=206.0):
"""The learning-regret term of Lemma 11 evaluated exactly:
C0 * K * sum_{t = tau_{m0-1}+1}^{T} 1/gamma_{m(t)},
gamma_m = gamma_const * sqrt(K / E_F(2^{m-2})), E_F = c3 sigma^2 d/(phi0 n).
"""
m0 = m0_eps(N)
tot = 0.0
m = m0
while 2 ** (m - 1) < T:
lo, hi = max(2 ** (m - 1), 2 ** (m0 - 1)), min(2 ** m, T)
if hi > lo:
EF = EF_ridge(2 ** (m - 2), d, sigma, phi0, c3)
gamma = gamma_const * np.sqrt(K / EF)
tot += C0 * K * (hi - lo) / gamma
m += 1
return tot
def eq_e30():
"""Verify the closed form of Eq. (E.30): the learning term is Theta(sigma sqrt(KdT))
and obeys the paper's stated constant 151 sigma sqrt(KdT)."""
base = dict(K=5, d=5, sigma=0.05)
Ts = np.array([2 ** k for k in range(12, 22)])
sT = loglog_slope(Ts, [regret_sum(T=T, **base) for T in Ts])
check("Eq. E.30: learning regret ~ T^1/2", abs(sT - 0.5) < 0.02,
f"fitted exponent in T = {sT:.4f} (theory 1/2)")
Ks = np.array([2, 3, 5, 10, 20, 40])
sK = loglog_slope(Ks, [regret_sum(T=2 ** 20, K=K, d=5, sigma=0.05) for K in Ks])
check("Eq. E.30: learning regret ~ K^1/2", abs(sK - 0.5) < 0.02,
f"fitted exponent in K = {sK:.4f} (theory 1/2)")
ds = np.array([2, 3, 5, 10, 20, 40])
sd = loglog_slope(ds, [regret_sum(T=2 ** 20, K=5, d=d, sigma=0.05) for d in ds])
check("Eq. E.30: learning regret ~ d^1/2", abs(sd - 0.5) < 0.02,
f"fitted exponent in d = {sd:.4f} (theory 1/2)")
ss = np.array([0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2])
ss_ = loglog_slope(ss, [regret_sum(T=2 ** 20, K=5, d=5, sigma=s) for s in ss])
check("Eq. E.30: learning regret ~ sigma^1", abs(ss_ - 1.0) < 0.02,
f"fitted exponent in sigma = {ss_:.4f} (theory 1)")
# ---- the paper's explicit constant -----------------------------------
# E.30's last-but-one step replaces sum_{m=m0}^{log2 T} 2^{m/2} by
# int_{m0}^{log2 T} 2^{x/2} dx. For an INCREASING integrand the sum EXCEEDS the
# integral, so this direction is invalid: sum -> 2^{M/2}/(1 - 2^{-1/2}) = 3.414 sqrt(T)
# while the integral gives (2/ln 2) sqrt(T) = 2.885 sqrt(T). The paper's stated
# constant 151 is therefore understated by the factor 3.414/2.885 = 1.183.
M = 24
disc = sum(2 ** (m / 2) for m in range(6, M + 1))
integ = (2 ** (M / 2) - 2 ** 3) * 2 / np.log(2)
check("E.30: sum_m 2^{m/2} EXCEEDS int 2^{x/2} dx (paper bounds it the wrong way)",
disc > integ, f"discrete sum/integral = {disc/integ:.4f} > 1 "
f"(asymptotically 3.4142/2.8854 = 1.1833)")
ratios = []
for T in [2 ** k for k in range(12, 22)]:
for K in [3, 5, 10]:
for d in [2, 5, 10]:
r = regret_sum(T=T, K=K, d=d, sigma=0.05)
ratios.append(r / (0.05 * np.sqrt(K * d * T)))
mx = max(ratios)
check("E.30: paper's constant 151 is VIOLATED; correct constant is ~176",
mx > 151.0 and mx <= 177.0,
f"max over 90 (T,K,d) grid points of term/(sigma sqrt(KdT)) = {mx:.1f}; "
f"paper claims <=151, closed form 51.5/(1-2^-1/2) = {51.5/(1-2**-0.5):.1f}")
RES["e30"] = dict(T=sT, K=sK, d=sd, sigma=ss_, max_ratio=float(mx),
correct_constant=float(51.5 / (1 - 2 ** -0.5)))
# ---- E.29 line 2 typo --------------------------------------------------
# As printed, E.29 line 2 reads 52 sum_m sqrt(K E_F(...) (tau_m - tau_{m-1})).
# Lemma 11 actually yields (tau_m - tau_{m-1}) * sqrt(K E_F). The printed form is
# O(sqrt(Kd) log T); only the latter gives O(sqrt(KdT)). Distinguish by the T exponent.
def printed_sum(T, K=5, d=5, sigma=0.05):
s = 0.0
for m in range(6, int(np.log2(T)) + 1):
EF = EF_ridge(2 ** (m - 2), d, sigma, 1.0, 1.0)
s += 52 * np.sqrt(K * EF * 2 ** (m - 1))
return s
Ts = np.array([2 ** k for k in range(12, 25)])
sp = loglog_slope(Ts, [printed_sum(T) for T in Ts])
check("E.29 as printed is O(polylog T), not O(sqrt(T)) -- a typo, not the real bound",
sp < 0.15, f"fitted exponent in T of the printed expression = {sp:.4f} "
f"(log-like); the corrected expression gives {sT:.4f}")
# ---------------------------------------------------------------- Theorem 1
def theorem1():
"""N(eps) exponents (Claim 2) evaluated on the closed form of Eq. (7)."""
base = dict(sigma=0.05, eps=0.05, tau=0.01, phi0=1.0)
Ks = np.array([2, 3, 5, 10, 20, 40])
sK = loglog_slope(Ks, [N_eps(K=K, d=5, **base) for K in Ks])
check("Theorem 1: N(eps) ~ K^3", abs(sK - 3.0) < 1e-6,
f"fitted exponent in K = {sK:.6f} (paper: cubic in arms)")
# The paper advertises N(eps) as "linear in context (d)". The formula's d-factor is
# (sigma^2 d + 1), which is linear only once sigma^2 d >> 1. At the paper's own
# noise levels that crossover sits far beyond any d it uses.
ds = np.array([2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200])
sd = loglog_slope(ds, [N_eps(K=5, d=d, **base) for d in ds])
check("Theorem 1: N(eps) is NOT linear in d at the paper's own sigma=0.05",
sd < 0.2, f"fitted exponent in d over d in [2,200] = {sd:.4f}, i.e. essentially "
f"CONSTANT, because sigma^2 d < 1 until d > 1/sigma^2 = {1/0.05**2:.0f}. "
f"Every d used in the paper (2,5,10,70) lies in this flat regime.")
ds2 = np.array([1e5, 1e6, 1e7, 1e8])
sd2 = loglog_slope(ds2, [N_eps(K=5, d=d, **base) for d in ds2])
check("Theorem 1: N(eps) -> d^1 only asymptotically (sigma^2 d >> 1)",
abs(sd2 - 1.0) < 0.02,
f"fitted exponent in d over d in [1e5,1e8] = {sd2:.4f} (theory 1)")
es = np.array([0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1])
se = loglog_slope(es + 0.01, [N_eps(K=5, d=5, sigma=0.05, eps=e, tau=0.01, phi0=1.0)
for e in es])
check("Theorem 1: N(eps) ~ (tau+eps)^-2", abs(se + 2.0) < 1e-6,
f"fitted exponent in (tau+eps) = {se:.6f} (theory -2)")
ps = np.array([0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0])
sp = loglog_slope(ps, [N_eps(K=5, d=5, sigma=0.05, eps=0.05, tau=0.01, phi0=p)
for p in ps])
check("Theorem 1: N(eps) ~ phi0^-1", abs(sp + 1.0) < 1e-6,
f"fitted exponent in phi0 = {sp:.6f} (theory -1)")
# L(eps) is decreasing in eps and >= 1
es = np.linspace(0.0, 1.0, 101)
Ls = np.array([L_eps(e, 0.01, 0.95) for e in es])
check("Theorem 1: L(eps) decreasing in eps and >= 1",
bool(np.all(np.diff(Ls) < 0) and np.all(Ls >= 1.0)),
f"L(0)={Ls[0]:.1f} -> L(1)={Ls[-1]:.1f}")
RES["theorem1"] = dict(K=sK, d_small=sd, d_large=sd2, eps=se, phi0=sp)
# ------------------------------- Theorem 2 statement vs its own proof
def theorem2_statement():
"""Theorem 2 states the price-of-incentives term as 'T_cold ~ m0(eps)'. But
m0(eps) = ceil(2 + log2 N(eps)) is LOGARITHMIC in N, whereas (a) the proof E.29
uses tau_{m0-1} = 2^{m0-1} ~ 2 N(eps), and (b) the body text says this cost
'scales as O(1/eps^2)'. Only the proof's reading is self-consistent."""
out = {}
for eps in [0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1]:
N = N_eps(5, 5, 0.05, eps, 0.01, 1.0)
m0 = m0_eps(N)
out[eps] = dict(N=N, m0=m0, tau_m0_minus_1=2.0 ** (m0 - 1))
es = np.array(list(out))
s_m0 = loglog_slope(es + 0.01, [out[e]["m0"] for e in es])
s_tau = loglog_slope(es + 0.01, [out[e]["tau_m0_minus_1"] for e in es])
check("Theorem 2's stated T_cold ~ m0(eps) is NOT O(1/eps^2)", abs(s_m0) < 0.6,
f"exponent of m0(eps) in (tau+eps) = {s_m0:.3f}, not -2")
check("Theorem 2's proof term tau_{m0-1} IS O(1/eps^2)", abs(s_tau + 2.0) < 0.15,
f"exponent of tau_(m0-1) in (tau+eps) = {s_tau:.3f} (theory -2)")
RES["theorem2_statement"] = dict(m0_exponent=s_m0, tau_exponent=s_tau,
table={str(k): v for k, v in out.items()})
if __name__ == "__main__":
lemma7(); corollary1(); eq_e30(); theorem1(); theorem2_statement()
RES["n_fail"] = len(FAIL); RES["failed"] = FAIL
os.makedirs("outputs", exist_ok=True)
json.dump(RES, open("outputs/theory_checks.json", "w"), indent=1)
print(f"\n{len(RES['checks'])} checks, {len(FAIL)} failed")
sys.exit(1 if FAIL else 0)
|