Datasets:
Tasks:
Visual Question Answering
Modalities:
Text
Formats:
json
Languages:
English
Size:
< 1K
Tags:
vision-language-models
visual-token-pruning
energy-efficiency
green-ai
multimodal-evaluation
reliability
License:
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,106 +1,111 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
-
pretty_name:
|
| 3 |
language:
|
| 4 |
- en
|
| 5 |
-
license:
|
| 6 |
task_categories:
|
| 7 |
- visual-question-answering
|
| 8 |
tags:
|
| 9 |
- vision-language-models
|
| 10 |
- visual-token-pruning
|
| 11 |
-
- green-ai
|
| 12 |
- energy-efficiency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
- reliability
|
| 14 |
-
|
| 15 |
-
-
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
-
|
| 18 |
-
path: data/query_manifests/prospective.jsonl
|
| 19 |
-
- split: development
|
| 20 |
-
path: data/query_manifests/development.jsonl
|
| 21 |
-
- config_name: safety_labels
|
| 22 |
-
data_files:
|
| 23 |
-
- split: development
|
| 24 |
-
path: data/safety_labels/development.jsonl
|
| 25 |
-
- split: prospective
|
| 26 |
-
path: data/safety_labels/prospective.jsonl
|
| 27 |
-
- config_name: prospective_decisions
|
| 28 |
-
data_files:
|
| 29 |
-
- split: prospective
|
| 30 |
-
path: data/controller_decisions/prospective.jsonl
|
| 31 |
-
- config_name: replication_decisions
|
| 32 |
-
data_files:
|
| 33 |
-
- split: replication
|
| 34 |
-
path: data/controller_decisions/replication.jsonl
|
| 35 |
-
- config_name: replication_membership
|
| 36 |
-
data_files:
|
| 37 |
-
- split: replication
|
| 38 |
-
path: data/replication/membership.jsonl
|
| 39 |
---
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-
# ViRel-Budget
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
-
-
|
| 56 |
-
-
|
| 57 |
-
-
|
| 58 |
-
-
|
| 59 |
-
- `replication_decisions`: matched one-call decisions and measured energy/latency outcomes for the replication population.
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
-
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
labels = load_dataset("SeanWan05/ViRel-Budget", "safety_labels")
|
| 68 |
-
prospective = load_dataset("SeanWan05/ViRel-Budget", "prospective_decisions")
|
| 69 |
-
replications = load_dataset("SeanWan05/ViRel-Budget", "replication_decisions")
|
| 70 |
-
```
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
-
|
| 73 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
-
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
-
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
-
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
-
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
-
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
-
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
-
-
|
| 98 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 99 |
|
| 100 |
## Citation
|
| 101 |
|
| 102 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
-
##
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
+
pretty_name: ViRel-Budget
|
| 3 |
language:
|
| 4 |
- en
|
| 5 |
+
license: other
|
| 6 |
task_categories:
|
| 7 |
- visual-question-answering
|
| 8 |
tags:
|
| 9 |
- vision-language-models
|
| 10 |
- visual-token-pruning
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
- energy-efficiency
|
| 12 |
+
- green-ai
|
| 13 |
+
- multimodal-evaluation
|
| 14 |
- reliability
|
| 15 |
+
- acm-mm
|
| 16 |
+
- greenmm
|
| 17 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 18 |
+
- 1K<n<10K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
---
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
+
# ViRel-Budget
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
**Reliability-constrained visual-token budgeting for green vision-language inference**
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
Accepted for an oral presentation at the ACM MM 2026 GreenMM Workshop.
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
[](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22014989)
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
- **Code:** [StableTradeAtlas/ViRel-Budget](https://github.com/StableTradeAtlas/ViRel-Budget)
|
| 30 |
+
- **Archival release:** [Zenodo record 22014989](https://zenodo.org/records/22014989)
|
| 31 |
+
- **Dataset:** [StableTradeAtlas/ViRel-Budget](https://huggingface.co/datasets/StableTradeAtlas/ViRel-Budget)
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
+
## Dataset summary
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
+
ViRel-Budget releases evaluation manifests, derived annotations, configuration files, and documentation for studying reliability-constrained visual-token pruning in vision-language inference. It supports separate evaluation of task correctness, dense-answer agreement, intervention-defined response preservation, GPU energy, latency, memory, and reliability-adjusted efficiency.
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
+
The public evaluation design contains a 1,200-query development pool and 900 group-isolated prospective queries. The principal systems comparison is additionally evaluated on three independently sampled, group-disjoint 210-case workloads (630 cases total). These repeated workloads test robustness of the systems result; they are not presented as independent replications of the full study.
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
+
> ViRel-Budget measures **intervention-defined visual reliance**. It does not certify universal semantic grounding or whether a model used the correct visual evidence. Intervention outputs supervise and evaluate the controller but are unavailable to it at deployment.
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
+
## Supported uses
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
+
This release is intended for:
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
+
- reproducing the reported evaluation protocol and saved-result analyses;
|
| 46 |
+
- auditing task correctness separately from intervention-defined behavior preservation;
|
| 47 |
+
- comparing dense inference with FastV, SCOPE, and a deterministic Random control under the documented configurations;
|
| 48 |
+
- studying whether measured device-energy savings remain positive after reliability qualification and repeated-workload evaluation.
|
|
|
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
+
It is not intended as a general-purpose VQA training corpus, a universal grounding benchmark, or evidence that token reduction necessarily reduces device energy.
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
+
## Data sources and configurations
|
|
|
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
+
The evaluation manifests reference public source datasets rather than redistributing their images:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
+
| Source | Canonical identifier | Configuration / split used |
|
| 57 |
+
|---|---|---|
|
| 58 |
+
| MMStar | [Lin-Chen/MMStar](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Lin-Chen/MMStar) | validation split |
|
| 59 |
+
| POPE | [lmms-lab/POPE](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmms-lab/POPE) | Full; adversarial, popular, and random subsets |
|
| 60 |
+
| Visual CounterFact | [mgolov/Visual-Counterfact](https://huggingface.co/datasets/mgolov/Visual-Counterfact) | default; color and size subsets |
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
+
Users must obtain source images from the original providers and comply with each source dataset's license and terms.
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
+
## Evaluation design and leakage controls
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
+
Prospective grouping uses the source-image SHA-256 together with normalized exact non-template question frequency below five. This produces 819 groups among the 900 prospective cases, with no source-image overlap between development and prospective partitions.
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
+
Cases for which an intervention has no eligible visual tokens are excluded from that intervention's safety denominator rather than counted as vacuously safe. Eligible prospective counts are:
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
+
| Backend | SCOPE | FastV | Random |
|
| 71 |
+
|---|---:|---:|---:|
|
| 72 |
+
| LLaVA-1.5-7B | 296 / 900 | 297 / 900 | 297 / 900 |
|
| 73 |
+
| LLaVA-1.5-13B | 253 / 900 | 251 / 900 | 251 / 900 |
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
+
Prospective reliability results and repeated-workload energy results belong to different evaluation populations and should not be pooled.
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
+
## Main systems result
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
+
On the separate 630-query repeated-workload population, SCOPE produced positive measured GPU-energy reductions on all three draws: 11.87% for the 7B backend (95% CI 7.19%–16.30%) and 10.62% for the 13B backend (95% CI 7.48%–13.46%). Under the evaluated implementations, FastV and Random did not show consistent device-energy savings. These findings are bounded to the documented models, workloads, software revisions, and NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition measurement environment.
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
+
## Reproduction
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
+
Use the canonical code repository for scripts, pinned external revisions, test fixtures, measurement boundaries, and reproduction instructions:
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
+
**https://github.com/StableTradeAtlas/ViRel-Budget**
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
The public code release pins the FastV, SCOPE, and LLaVA-PruMerge dependencies used by the study and records CodeCarbon 3.2.9 for prospective carbon accounting. Saved-result inspection does not require a GPU; model-backed execution requires the documented external environments and model weights.
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
## Limitations and responsible use
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
- The controller is model-, pruner-, workload-, and hardware-specific.
|
| 92 |
+
- Task/source indicators are strong controller features, so transfer to unseen task families is not established.
|
| 93 |
+
- Intervention-defined preservation is a behavioral criterion, not proof of causal or semantically correct grounding.
|
| 94 |
+
- Carbon values are operational estimates based on measured GPU energy and disclosed PUE/grid assumptions, not lifecycle assessments.
|
| 95 |
+
- Source images, model weights, full historical intermediate grids, private mappings, and raw telemetry streams are not redistributed.
|
| 96 |
+
- Derived annotations can inherit selection, label, language, and measurement biases from the source datasets and evaluated models.
|
| 97 |
+
- The released manifests are not designed to contain personal or sensitive information, but users should consult and follow the source datasets' documentation.
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
## Open data and code statement
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
To support transparency, reproducibility, and reuse, we release evaluation manifests, derived annotations, configuration files, and accompanying documentation through this Hugging Face dataset. The [canonical GitHub repository](https://github.com/StableTradeAtlas/ViRel-Budget) releases the source code, evaluation scripts, summarized experimental outputs, and compact raw repeated-workload records. Source images, model weights, complete historical intermediate grids, and private mappings are not redistributed; users must obtain external materials from their original providers under the applicable licenses and terms.
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
## Citation
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
+
Please cite the accompanying camera-ready paper and the archived release. Machine-readable citation metadata is provided in this dataset repository's [`CITATION.cff`](CITATION.cff). The canonical code repository also maintains [software citation metadata](https://github.com/StableTradeAtlas/ViRel-Budget/blob/main/CITATION.cff).
|
| 106 |
+
|
| 107 |
+
DOI: [10.5281/zenodo.22014989](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22014989)
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
+
## Licensing
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
+
The GitHub code is licensed under Apache-2.0. This dataset repository contains derived manifests and metadata whose reuse remains subject to the licenses and terms of the referenced source datasets. The `license: other` metadata value is intentional and avoids implying that one blanket license overrides upstream rights.
|