zlysunshine commited on
Commit
0539ddd
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 491b13c

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +72 -67
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,106 +1,111 @@
1
  ---
2
- pretty_name: "ViRel-Budget: Metadata and Derived Evaluation Artifacts"
3
  language:
4
  - en
5
- license: apache-2.0
6
  task_categories:
7
  - visual-question-answering
8
  tags:
9
  - vision-language-models
10
  - visual-token-pruning
11
- - green-ai
12
  - energy-efficiency
 
 
13
  - reliability
14
- configs:
15
- - config_name: query_manifests
16
- data_files:
17
- - split: prospective
18
- path: data/query_manifests/prospective.jsonl
19
- - split: development
20
- path: data/query_manifests/development.jsonl
21
- - config_name: safety_labels
22
- data_files:
23
- - split: development
24
- path: data/safety_labels/development.jsonl
25
- - split: prospective
26
- path: data/safety_labels/prospective.jsonl
27
- - config_name: prospective_decisions
28
- data_files:
29
- - split: prospective
30
- path: data/controller_decisions/prospective.jsonl
31
- - config_name: replication_decisions
32
- data_files:
33
- - split: replication
34
- path: data/controller_decisions/replication.jsonl
35
- - config_name: replication_membership
36
- data_files:
37
- - split: replication
38
- path: data/replication/membership.jsonl
39
  ---
40
 
41
- # ViRel-Budget metadata and derived evaluation artifacts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
42
 
43
- This release accompanies **“ViRel-Budget: Reliability-Constrained Visual-Token Budgeting for Green Vision-Language Inference,”** accepted for an oral presentation at the ACM Multimedia 2026 GreenMM workshop.
44
 
45
- Authors: Sean Wan, Shilin Ou, and Luyao Zhang.
46
 
47
- ## Release boundary
48
 
49
- The package contains the frozen query-selection manifests, group identifiers, budget-specific behavioral-fidelity labels, prospective controller decisions, and three-draw replication membership/results used by the paper.
50
 
51
- It does **not** contain source images, questions, answers, or answer options. Those materials remain with MMStar, POPE, and Visual CounterFact and must be obtained from their official providers. The query manifests provide source repository, configuration, split, and row identifiers for reconstruction.
52
 
53
- ## Configurations
54
 
55
- - `query_manifests`: 1,200 development and 900 group-isolated prospective selections.
56
- - `safety_labels`: derived labels for two LLaVA-1.5 scales, FastV/SCOPE/Random, and four pruned budgets.
57
- - `prospective_decisions`: one-call decisions and execution outcomes for the six frozen prospective controllers.
58
- - `replication_membership`: three fixed, group-disjoint draws of 210 unique queries.
59
- - `replication_decisions`: matched one-call decisions and measured energy/latency outcomes for the replication population.
60
 
61
- ## Loading
62
 
63
- ```python
64
- from datasets import load_dataset
65
 
66
- queries = load_dataset("SeanWan05/ViRel-Budget", "query_manifests")
67
- labels = load_dataset("SeanWan05/ViRel-Budget", "safety_labels")
68
- prospective = load_dataset("SeanWan05/ViRel-Budget", "prospective_decisions")
69
- replications = load_dataset("SeanWan05/ViRel-Budget", "replication_decisions")
70
- ```
71
 
72
- GitHub repository: https://github.com/SeanWan514/ViRel-Budget
73
- HuggingFace repository: https://huggingface.co/datasets/SeanWan05/ViRel-Budget
 
 
 
74
 
75
- ## Safety-label interpretation
76
 
77
- `reference_safe` means that a pruned action preserved the dense model's original answer and its responses under all eligible interventions. It is an operational behavioral-fidelity label, not proof of semantic grounding or correct causal evidence use. Task correctness is reported separately where applicable.
78
 
79
- The 1,200-query development labels were used for controller fitting/calibration. The 900-query prospective labels were hidden until all controller decisions had been recorded.
80
 
81
- ## Energy and carbon boundary
82
 
83
- GPU energy is measured within the declared call window. Carbon values in the associated paper are estimates derived from measured energy plus disclosed grid-intensity and PUE assumptions; they are not direct emissions measurements or lifecycle assessments.
 
 
 
84
 
85
- ## Limitations
86
 
87
- The controller evidence covers LLaVA-1.5 7B and 13B only. The selected tasks come from three benchmark families. Intervention-defined fidelity may reflect uncertainty, distribution shift, or intervention artifacts, and it inherits errors from the dense reference. Results do not establish transfer to unrelated VLM backbones, hardware, or modalities.
88
 
89
- ## Source datasets and licensing
90
 
91
- The original ViRel-Budget metadata and derived labels/results in this repository are released under the Apache License 2.0; see [`LICENSE`](LICENSE). See [`LICENSES.md`](LICENSES.md) for the third-party boundary. Users must retrieve source content from the official upstream repositories and comply with their current terms.
92
 
93
- ## Integrity
94
 
95
- - `hf_source_inventory.json` records source paths, checksums, and the code-repository commit used for packaging.
96
- - `validation_report.json` records structural and leakage checks.
97
- - `release_manifest.json` records the checksum and size of every upload candidate file.
98
- - `dataset_schema.json` documents the configurations and primary keys.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
99
 
100
  ## Citation
101
 
102
- Final ACM citation metadata will be added after the DOI and proceedings metadata are issued.
 
 
103
 
104
- ## Acknowledgments
105
 
106
- Sean Wan and Shilin Ou gratefully acknowledge support from the Summer Research Scholars Program at Duke Kunshan University, under the supervision of Prof. Luyao Zhang, and from the Duke Kunshan University Library grant supporting the Open Data Contest project.
 
1
  ---
2
+ pretty_name: ViRel-Budget
3
  language:
4
  - en
5
+ license: other
6
  task_categories:
7
  - visual-question-answering
8
  tags:
9
  - vision-language-models
10
  - visual-token-pruning
 
11
  - energy-efficiency
12
+ - green-ai
13
+ - multimodal-evaluation
14
  - reliability
15
+ - acm-mm
16
+ - greenmm
17
+ size_categories:
18
+ - 1K<n<10K
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
19
  ---
20
 
21
+ # ViRel-Budget
22
+
23
+ **Reliability-constrained visual-token budgeting for green vision-language inference**
24
+
25
+ Accepted for an oral presentation at the ACM MM 2026 GreenMM Workshop.
26
+
27
+ [![DOI](https://img.shields.io/badge/DOI-10.5281%2Fzenodo.22014989-blue.svg)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22014989)
28
+
29
+ - **Code:** [StableTradeAtlas/ViRel-Budget](https://github.com/StableTradeAtlas/ViRel-Budget)
30
+ - **Archival release:** [Zenodo record 22014989](https://zenodo.org/records/22014989)
31
+ - **Dataset:** [StableTradeAtlas/ViRel-Budget](https://huggingface.co/datasets/StableTradeAtlas/ViRel-Budget)
32
 
33
+ ## Dataset summary
34
 
35
+ ViRel-Budget releases evaluation manifests, derived annotations, configuration files, and documentation for studying reliability-constrained visual-token pruning in vision-language inference. It supports separate evaluation of task correctness, dense-answer agreement, intervention-defined response preservation, GPU energy, latency, memory, and reliability-adjusted efficiency.
36
 
37
+ The public evaluation design contains a 1,200-query development pool and 900 group-isolated prospective queries. The principal systems comparison is additionally evaluated on three independently sampled, group-disjoint 210-case workloads (630 cases total). These repeated workloads test robustness of the systems result; they are not presented as independent replications of the full study.
38
 
39
+ > ViRel-Budget measures **intervention-defined visual reliance**. It does not certify universal semantic grounding or whether a model used the correct visual evidence. Intervention outputs supervise and evaluate the controller but are unavailable to it at deployment.
40
 
41
+ ## Supported uses
42
 
43
+ This release is intended for:
44
 
45
+ - reproducing the reported evaluation protocol and saved-result analyses;
46
+ - auditing task correctness separately from intervention-defined behavior preservation;
47
+ - comparing dense inference with FastV, SCOPE, and a deterministic Random control under the documented configurations;
48
+ - studying whether measured device-energy savings remain positive after reliability qualification and repeated-workload evaluation.
 
49
 
50
+ It is not intended as a general-purpose VQA training corpus, a universal grounding benchmark, or evidence that token reduction necessarily reduces device energy.
51
 
52
+ ## Data sources and configurations
 
53
 
54
+ The evaluation manifests reference public source datasets rather than redistributing their images:
 
 
 
 
55
 
56
+ | Source | Canonical identifier | Configuration / split used |
57
+ |---|---|---|
58
+ | MMStar | [Lin-Chen/MMStar](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Lin-Chen/MMStar) | validation split |
59
+ | POPE | [lmms-lab/POPE](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmms-lab/POPE) | Full; adversarial, popular, and random subsets |
60
+ | Visual CounterFact | [mgolov/Visual-Counterfact](https://huggingface.co/datasets/mgolov/Visual-Counterfact) | default; color and size subsets |
61
 
62
+ Users must obtain source images from the original providers and comply with each source dataset's license and terms.
63
 
64
+ ## Evaluation design and leakage controls
65
 
66
+ Prospective grouping uses the source-image SHA-256 together with normalized exact non-template question frequency below five. This produces 819 groups among the 900 prospective cases, with no source-image overlap between development and prospective partitions.
67
 
68
+ Cases for which an intervention has no eligible visual tokens are excluded from that intervention's safety denominator rather than counted as vacuously safe. Eligible prospective counts are:
69
 
70
+ | Backend | SCOPE | FastV | Random |
71
+ |---|---:|---:|---:|
72
+ | LLaVA-1.5-7B | 296 / 900 | 297 / 900 | 297 / 900 |
73
+ | LLaVA-1.5-13B | 253 / 900 | 251 / 900 | 251 / 900 |
74
 
75
+ Prospective reliability results and repeated-workload energy results belong to different evaluation populations and should not be pooled.
76
 
77
+ ## Main systems result
78
 
79
+ On the separate 630-query repeated-workload population, SCOPE produced positive measured GPU-energy reductions on all three draws: 11.87% for the 7B backend (95% CI 7.19%–16.30%) and 10.62% for the 13B backend (95% CI 7.48%–13.46%). Under the evaluated implementations, FastV and Random did not show consistent device-energy savings. These findings are bounded to the documented models, workloads, software revisions, and NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition measurement environment.
80
 
81
+ ## Reproduction
82
 
83
+ Use the canonical code repository for scripts, pinned external revisions, test fixtures, measurement boundaries, and reproduction instructions:
84
 
85
+ **https://github.com/StableTradeAtlas/ViRel-Budget**
86
+
87
+ The public code release pins the FastV, SCOPE, and LLaVA-PruMerge dependencies used by the study and records CodeCarbon 3.2.9 for prospective carbon accounting. Saved-result inspection does not require a GPU; model-backed execution requires the documented external environments and model weights.
88
+
89
+ ## Limitations and responsible use
90
+
91
+ - The controller is model-, pruner-, workload-, and hardware-specific.
92
+ - Task/source indicators are strong controller features, so transfer to unseen task families is not established.
93
+ - Intervention-defined preservation is a behavioral criterion, not proof of causal or semantically correct grounding.
94
+ - Carbon values are operational estimates based on measured GPU energy and disclosed PUE/grid assumptions, not lifecycle assessments.
95
+ - Source images, model weights, full historical intermediate grids, private mappings, and raw telemetry streams are not redistributed.
96
+ - Derived annotations can inherit selection, label, language, and measurement biases from the source datasets and evaluated models.
97
+ - The released manifests are not designed to contain personal or sensitive information, but users should consult and follow the source datasets' documentation.
98
+
99
+ ## Open data and code statement
100
+
101
+ To support transparency, reproducibility, and reuse, we release evaluation manifests, derived annotations, configuration files, and accompanying documentation through this Hugging Face dataset. The [canonical GitHub repository](https://github.com/StableTradeAtlas/ViRel-Budget) releases the source code, evaluation scripts, summarized experimental outputs, and compact raw repeated-workload records. Source images, model weights, complete historical intermediate grids, and private mappings are not redistributed; users must obtain external materials from their original providers under the applicable licenses and terms.
102
 
103
  ## Citation
104
 
105
+ Please cite the accompanying camera-ready paper and the archived release. Machine-readable citation metadata is provided in this dataset repository's [`CITATION.cff`](CITATION.cff). The canonical code repository also maintains [software citation metadata](https://github.com/StableTradeAtlas/ViRel-Budget/blob/main/CITATION.cff).
106
+
107
+ DOI: [10.5281/zenodo.22014989](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22014989)
108
 
109
+ ## Licensing
110
 
111
+ The GitHub code is licensed under Apache-2.0. This dataset repository contains derived manifests and metadata whose reuse remains subject to the licenses and terms of the referenced source datasets. The `license: other` metadata value is intentional and avoids implying that one blanket license overrides upstream rights.