[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: HOLLERINGGGGGGG. stupid baby bitch.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Facebook post sharing a link to a local Ethiopian news article about a recent election, with a comment section filled with discussions about the candidates and their policies, but also containing a link to a blog with affiliate marketing for a local business
LANGUAGE: Amharic | REGION: East Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Spam

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Facebook user posted four screenshots of infographics titled 'How to check your balls (testicles).' The infographics provide written and visual instructions on how to perform a testicular self-examination, including drawings of a man using his hands to examine his testicles. The caption read: 'have you given your balls a squeeze this month?'
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: Europe | LOCATION: United Kingdom
RELEVANT POLICY: Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity
COMPLEXITY: MEDIUM

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The post relates to health awareness about testicular cancer, a significant medical issue. The user is a cancer survivor advocating for early detection. The case involves medical and health exceptions in content moderation policies.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, Bylaws Article 3 Section 1, Bylaws Article 2 Section 2.1.3

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found that the content was medical and educational in nature, falling within the exception for health contexts under Meta's Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity policy. Meta's removal was inconsistent with its own standards, and the content did not violate the policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Facebook user posted a video depicting a religious procession in Sambalpur, Odisha, related to the Hindu festival of Hanuman Jayanti. The video shows a crowd carrying saffron-colored flags and chanting 'Jai Shri Ram,' followed by a person throwing a stone at the procession and the crowd pelting stones back while chanting phrases that translate to 'run' and 'hit'. The video was viewed about 2,000 times and received fewer than 100 comments and reactions. The post was associated with communal violence between Hindus and Muslims during the festival, which led to government-imposed internet shutdowns, social media blocks, curfews, and reports of arson and a fatality.
LANGUAGE: Odia | REGION: South Asia | LOCATION: India
RELEVANT POLICY: Violence and incitement
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The video is set during the Hindu festival of Hanuman Jayanti in Odisha, India, involving communal violence between Hindus and Muslims. The chant 'Jai Shri Ram' has religious significance but has also been used to promote hostility against minority groups, adding cultural and political sensitivity to the content.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, Bylaws Article 3 Section 1

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Reasoning: The Board upheld Meta's removal decision, finding the post violated rules on violence and incitement. The Board agreed that removing all identical videos was justified due to heightened tensions and ongoing violence in Odisha. The Board urged Meta to allow content that condemns or raises awareness of violent threats.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Send home migrants not in need of protection, Peter Dutton tells UN, HEY DUTTON HOW ABOUT THE ONES THAT HAVE STAYED AND NOT LEFT THE COUNTRY WHEN THEY SHOULD OVERSTAYERS ? WHY DONT YOU GO AND ROUND ALL THEM UP ?
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Making them look ~anatomically correct~ just makes them... Bland. Not all women are tiny and fit, not all men are bulky.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user @user America's public assistance, Medicare Medicaid, SS, et al are strained and Americans "benefits" are being cut not even able to maintain status quo. No immigrants should be granted entry that need assistance!#NODACA#NOREFUGE
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Three different pieces of Facebook content containing the phrase “From the River to the Sea.” One post included a comment on a video encouraging others to “speak up” with hashtags like #ceasefire and #freepalestine, and the comment itself included the phrase “FromTheRiverToTheSea” as a hashtag, along with #DefundIsrael and heart emojis in Palestinian flag colors. The posts expressed solidarity with Palestinians but did not contain language calling for violence or exclusion, nor did they glorify or refer to Hamas.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: Middle East | LOCATION: Canada, Israel, Palestinian Territories, United Kingdom
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech, Violent and Graphic Content, Dangerous Individuals and Organizations
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The phrase “From the River to the Sea” is politically and culturally sensitive, associated with Palestinian solidarity but also linked to the 2017 Hamas charter and recent violent attacks, leading to divergent interpretations. The decision occurred amid ongoing conflict following the October 2023 Hamas terrorist attack and Israel’s military response, with heightened tensions and accusations of violations of international law, as well as increased antisemitism and Islamophobia globally.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, Bylaws Article 3 Section 1

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found that the phrase “From the River to the Sea” has multiple meanings and is used with different intentions, and the posts did not contain calls for violence or exclusion or glorify a designated dangerous organization. While a minority viewed the phrase as linked to a designated entity due to its appearance in the 2017 Hamas charter and recent attacks, the majority concluded the content did not break Meta’s rules.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Don't fucking toy with me #WomenSuck
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Yoruba-language podcast discussing the legacy of a traditional king who led a rebellion against colonial powers, with some hosts praising his actions as a freedom fighter and others condemning them as violent
LANGUAGE: Yoruba | REGION: West Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A post describing the Tamil nationalist group LTTE as 'freedom fighters' and comparing the Sri Lankan government to a 'colonial oppressor', sparking debate about the legitimacy of the group's actions
LANGUAGE: Tamil | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: You ever be talkin to someone that you really wanna fuck, then they say one thing and all of the sudden you have no desire to fuck at all?
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Hindi-language post claiming that a Bollywood actor has made derogatory comments about the Indian caste system, prompting demands for apologies and potential caste-based violence
LANGUAGE: Hindi | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Spam

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Moroccan user posted a quote from a famous Arabic novel that contains a passage criticizing French colonialism, which was flagged as hate speech against Europeans
LANGUAGE: Arabic | REGION: North Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Illegal Alien Hit Man, Dragged Him For Blocks In Deadly DUI Crash #BuildTheWall #NoAmnesty #NoDACA #DeportThemAll #KeepAmericaSafe
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: i can't have a girlfriend my dick's only big enough for one of us
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Facebook user in Afghanistan posted text in Pashto discussing the importance of educating girls in Afghanistan, calling on people to raise concerns and noting the consequences of failing to do so with the Taliban. The post emphasized that preventing girls' access to education would be a loss to the nation.
LANGUAGE: Pashto | REGION: South Asia | LOCATION: Afghanistan
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations
COMPLEXITY: MEDIUM

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The post referenced the Taliban's control in Afghanistan and the impact on girls' education, a highly sensitive political and cultural issue in the region. The Board considered the context of political commentary and the importance of protecting discourse on human rights under Taliban rule.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, Bylaws Article 3 Section 1, Bylaws Article 2 Section 2.1.3, Shared Al Jazeera Post decision

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found that the post did not violate the Dangerous Organizations and Individuals policy because it discussed the Taliban in a neutral or critical manner rather than praising or supporting them. Meta's removal was an error, and the content was restored to uphold users' rights to political commentary.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: An Indonesian university student shared a Facebook post with a link to a blog about online safety tips, which included examples of scam emails and websites, but the link was shortened and looked suspicious
LANGUAGE: Indonesian | REGION: Southeast Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Spam

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A photo of a crowded market with a caption overlay saying 'the government is intentionally causing food shortages to control us, let's protest by blocking the highways'
LANGUAGE: Tamil | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Violence and Incitement

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Women in their 30's on vacation will literally fuck anything
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A discussion about the historical context of a local independence movement, with some users expressing support for armed resistance
LANGUAGE: Portuguese | REGION: Latin America
RELEVANT POLICY: Violence and Incitement

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A news article about the conviction of a local Kashmiri separatist leader, shared with a comment stating that the conviction is a victory for human rights
LANGUAGE: Hindi | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: An Arabic post from North Africa discussing the Islamic concept of 'shahada' (martyrdom) in a historical context, reported for violating community standards on self-harm
LANGUAGE: Arabic | REGION: North Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Spam

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A historical documentary about a controversial figure from the Algerian independence movement, with some users commenting that the figure was a hero and others saying they were a terrorist
LANGUAGE: Arabic | REGION: North Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Hundreds of Syrian refugees return home from Lebanon - ABC News
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A public Instagram account posted a carousel of images showing Arabic words that can be used derogatorily towards men with effeminate mannerisms, including terms like “zamel,” “foufou,” and “tante/tanta.” The caption explained the post's intent to reclaim the power of these hurtful terms and raise awareness about their use.
LANGUAGE: Arabic | REGION: Middle East | LOCATION: Egypt, Lebanon, Morocco
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The post relates to LGBTQIA+ expression in Arabic-speaking countries where such identities are often persecuted. The use of derogatory Arabic terms and the effort to reclaim them is culturally specific, highlighting challenges in moderating content in minority languages and contexts.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, Bylaws Article 3 Section 1

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found that the content was covered by exceptions in Meta’s Hate Speech policy for speech used self-referentially or in an empowering way, as well as quoting hate speech to condemn or raise awareness. The user’s intent to reclaim hurtful terms indicated that the content should not have been removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: When the pizza man is more than a minute late
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A user shared a quote from a Swahili proverb, which when taken out of context, appeared to condone revenge against a particular ethnic group, but when understood within the cultural context, was meant to convey a message of forgiveness and reconciliation
LANGUAGE: Swahili | REGION: East Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user shut the fuck up hes not gonna dick you was gonna send u this dope steroline edit but u can go cry to olly
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user Are you pussy grabbing tonight??
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Things we heard on primetime last night: “The growth rate of Muslims in Assam from 1971 to 1991 is 77 per cent, that is not an indigenous population. A large part of that 77 per cent are Bangladeshis….Bangladeshi go home." #NRCAssam
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: An Indonesian user posted a comedic sketch mocking a particular religious group's practices, which was reported for religious harassment, but the sketch was actually a self-deprecating critique of the user's own religious community
LANGUAGE: Indonesian | REGION: Southeast Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Turkish Instagram influencer posts photoshoot in a Turkish bath, with strategic posing and minimal clothing, blurring lines between cultural heritage and suggestive content
LANGUAGE: Turkish | REGION: Middle East
RELEVANT POLICY: Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Fox News host: Lock Clinton up Get this CUNT Pirro off the air. She is a woman hating woman.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Portuguese-language post from Latin America, promoting a documentary about a notorious Brazilian criminal, with a caption that walks the line between critique and admiration, and includes a link to an off-platform petition to free the criminal
LANGUAGE: Portuguese | REGION: Latin America
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Stop tweeting about your boyfriend. No one gives a shit. And you're gonna break up in a month anyway #WomenSuck
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A news outlet in Pakistan posted a video on Facebook of a Pakistani politician giving a speech in Urdu to the country's parliament. The speech referenced an ancient Egyptian tradition of human sacrifice to control flooding, using this figurative language to criticize Pakistan's political crisis and call for accountability among public officials, including the military. The politician implicated himself and colleagues as responsible for the country's issues, using non-literal references to officials being 'hanged' or 'sacrificed'. The post was shared widely and was made in the context of political turmoil ahead of delayed national elections.
LANGUAGE: Urdu | REGION: South Asia | LOCATION: Pakistan
RELEVANT POLICY: Violence and Incitement
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The speech referenced an ancient Egyptian tradition as a metaphor for political sacrifice, a culturally specific figurative device. The context of Pakistan's political crisis, military involvement, and election delays was central to understanding the speech's intent and impact.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found the post did not violate the Violence and Incitement Community Standard because it was shared by a media outlet for awareness raising. The figurative speech in the politician's address was non-literal and aimed at drawing attention to political issues ahead of elections, which the Board considered fundamental to protect.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user The real @user @user bho & holder also killed @user Officer Brian Terry with his #FastandFurious debacle. many others died because of your negligence??#buildthewall#DeportThemAll #NoDACA #NoAmnesty #noworkforEWI
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Two posts reporting on the war in Gaza were reviewed. The first post was an Instagram video from a Channel 4 News (UK) report about the killing of a Palestinian child, with a caption clarifying it did not promote dangerous organizations but told a story about a Palestinian family and humanitarian workers. The second post was a Facebook video from Al-Jazeera reporting on the war in Gaza, including analysis of hostage release negotiations between Israel and Hamas.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: Middle East | LOCATION: Israel, Palestinian Territories
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations
COMPLEXITY: MEDIUM

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The cases involved sensitive reporting on the ongoing conflict in Gaza, a politically charged and conflict-affected region. The Board emphasized the importance of safeguarding space for social and political discourse about such conflicts.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, Bylaws Article 3 Section 1, Bylaws Article 2 Section 2.1.3

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found that the posts were journalistic reports that did not violate Meta’s Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy, which allows content reporting on or neutrally discussing dangerous organizations. Meta acknowledged errors in enforcement and restored the content after the Board’s intervention.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: An Amharic-language post on a Ethiopian Facebook forum that likens a rival football team's fans to 'hyenas', a term that can be seen as either a lighthearted teasing or a dehumanizing insult
LANGUAGE: Amharic | REGION: East Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user good girl
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Facebook user posted a link to a Washington Post article covering the chronology of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The article preview, automatically included with the link, mentioned Hamas. The user did not add any caption or further context.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: Middle East | LOCATION: Israel, Palestinian Territories, United States
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations
COMPLEXITY: MEDIUM

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The case involved the politically sensitive Israel-Hamas conflict, where Hamas is designated as a dangerous organization by Meta. The context of news reporting on such entities is a recurring challenge for content moderation, especially during ongoing conflicts.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, Bylaws Article 3 Section 1, Bylaws Article 2 Section 2.1.3

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found that the post referenced Hamas in a news-reporting context, which is allowed under the Dangerous Organizations and Individuals policy. Meta's original removal was an over-enforcement of the policy, and the content was restored to preserve free expression and public access to information.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Two posts made in May 2025 used monkey emojis to refer to Black people. The first post, on Facebook by a user in Brazil, was a short video from the movie The Hangover with Portuguese dubbing and text overlay referencing Spanish football clubs and Brazilian football boys, captioned with a monkey emoji. The second post, on Instagram in Ireland, was a comment responding to a video condemning racism; the comment expressed a desire for the situation to "blow up" and have "glorious fun" with multiple monkey, laughing, and praying emojis, implying hateful and discriminatory targeting of Black people.
LANGUAGE: Portuguese for the first post, English for the second post | REGION: Latin America for the first post, Europe and North America for the second post | LOCATION: Brazil for the first post; Ireland, United States, Zimbabwe for the second post
RELEVANT POLICY: Hateful Conduct
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The posts referenced football (soccer) culture in Brazil and Spain, and the second post was a response to a racist incident in Ireland. The use of monkey emojis as algospeak to dehumanize Black people is a culturally specific form of coded hate speech that bypasses automated moderation.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, Bylaws Article 3 Section 1

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found that Meta's enforcement of the Hateful Conduct policy was inaccurate, especially in assessing emojis used as algospeak to convey hateful messages. Meta's classifiers identified the content but took no action, and human reviewers failed to accurately assess the posts. The Board emphasized the need for Meta to improve its moderation to comprehensively account for coded language including emojis.

Portuguese for the first post, English for the second post

Latin America for the first post, Europe and North America for the second post


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A series of infographics highlighting the economic benefits of a new government initiative, using persuasive language and statistics
LANGUAGE: Swahili | REGION: East Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Spam

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user Another incident in Germany will it be a drunk driver or another angry immigrant with issues innocent to proven Guilty there is so much goodwill before it becomes salt in the wounds of a giving Nation
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A photo of a Tanzanian government official's relative posing with a expensive car, with a Swahili caption insinuating that the vehicle was purchased with embezzled funds
LANGUAGE: Swahili | REGION: East Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Violence and Incitement

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Swahili-language post showcasing a local artisan's handmade crafts, with prices and contact information included, in a Facebook group focused on promoting East African culture
LANGUAGE: Swahili | REGION: East Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Spam

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Moroccan user shared an article analyzing the influence of Abdullah Azzam, a Palestinian jihadist, on modern Islamist thought, and the implications for Middle Eastern politics and society.
LANGUAGE: Arabic | REGION: North Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Two posts were shared: 1) a video of an HTS commander's speech encouraging rebel fighters to attack their enemies, and 2) an image with a photograph of HTS leader Ahmed al-Sharaa and Arabic text of part of a speech he gave, encouraging HTS fighters to fight towards Damascus.
LANGUAGE: Arabic | REGION: Middle East | LOCATION: Syria
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The conflict in Syria and the role of HTS as a designated terrorist group by the UN Security Council are significant cultural and political contexts that influenced the Board's decision.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, human rights responsibilities

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Oversight Board found that removing the content was inconsistent with Meta's human rights responsibilities, and that the public interest in receiving information that could keep people safe in a rapidly evolving conflict situation outweighed the potential harm. The Board also noted that communication is truncated in political conflicts, making contextual clues less overt to outsiders.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A lighthearted discussion about the cultural significance of the Bengali New Year, with some users jokingly teasing each other about their festive preparations
LANGUAGE: Bengali | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Bullying and Harassment

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user Not all men youre right Doyoung wouldnt treat me like this !!!!
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A news article shared on social media, claiming that a new mosque in Morocco is the largest in the world, when in fact it is a smaller mosque in Algeria, with misleading comparisons to other mosques in the region
LANGUAGE: Arabic | REGION: North Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Misinformation

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Swahili-language post about a community fundraising event with a link to a personal PayPal account
LANGUAGE: Swahili | REGION: East Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Spam

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: About the case
LANGUAGE: Armenian | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Misinformation
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Reasoning: The right to freedom of expression: Article 19, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR),General Comment No. 34, Human Rights Committee, 2011; UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, reportsA/68/362(2013);A/HRC/38/35(2018);A/74/486(2019);A/77/288(2022).The right to life: Article 6, ICCPR.The right to be free from torture, inhuman or degrading treatment: Article 7, ICCPR.The right to privacy: Article 17, ICCPR.Protection of prisoners of war from insults and public curiosity: Article 13, para. 2 Convention III r


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Hindu nationalist leader has made comments about the 'threat' posed by Muslim immigration to India, which some have condemned as Islamophobic, while others see it as a legitimate concern about national security
LANGUAGE: Hindi | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Turkish user posted a tweet about the Kurdish-Turkish conflict, referencing the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), a militant separatist group, in the context of a historical documentary about the region's complex cultural heritage
LANGUAGE: Turkish | REGION: Middle East
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A link to a news article discussing the historical tensions between the Maasai and Kikuyu tribes in Kenya, with a caption that could be perceived as either factual or inflammatory
LANGUAGE: Swahili | REGION: East Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user @user Grant you the first point, but it was a joke more than an insult.About the second point though, calling an hysterical person hysterical doesn't set anyone back. There are hysterical women (and men), bitches and douchebags, ass
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: More migrants take sea route to #Spain than Italy this year: UN
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: I've been called a son of a whore and a cunt today already. It's not even 1 yet
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Because it’s easy to call women those things when the one hurting you repeatedly acts like he wasn’t being the slut and whore himself.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: An Arabic-language online forum discussing the role of women in a traditional North African society, with some participants arguing that certain customs are oppressive and others claiming they are essential to cultural identity
LANGUAGE: Arabic | REGION: North Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user Screw her and her beliefs!! Send them packing!! This is a Christian nation with Christian laws. #BuildThatWall #kag
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Hindi-language blog post discussed the health benefits of Ayurvedic practices, including images of various concoctions and supplements, which some readers mistook for advertisements.
LANGUAGE: Hindi | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Spam

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user I am not forcing anyone. I am just putting out my view. People believe it or not is their prerogative.Even if a single person agree with me, it is ok with me. Thanks,
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user its Time to Enforce the Public Charge #Immigration laws!  U.S Taxpayers should not be forced to take care of #Immigrants and Refugees collecting Welfare while our #Veterans are Homeless #Trump #MAGA #SendThemBack #RedNationRising
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Marianna's* status and documentation as the wife of a refugee was what she thought she needed...However, only...
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Last I checked men HAVE THE PENIS and women DON'T. I Won't say it again but THE DICK IS ALL THAT MATTERS #MensRights!
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.