[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: The user posted content containing COVID-19 misinformation, including claims such as denying the existence of COVID-19 and asserting that COVID-19 vaccines cause magnetism. Meta removed approximately 27 million pieces of such misinformation from Facebook and Instagram between March 2020 and July 2022 under its 'Misinformation about health during public health emergencies' policy.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: Unknown
RELEVANT POLICY: Misinformation about health during public health emergencies
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, Bylaws Article 3 Section 1, Claimed COVID cure precedent

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board concluded that as long as the WHO continues to declare COVID-19 an international public health emergency, Meta should maintain its current policy to remove COVID-19 misinformation likely to cause imminent physical harm. However, the Board recommended reassessing the claims and preparing for changes when the WHO declaration is lifted to protect freedom of expression.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Have you heard ‘Wavy Bassline Mix (HALLOWEEN SPECIAL)’ by The Skank Bank on #SoundCloud? #np
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Facebook post in Swahili calls for the forced assimilation of the Maasai people into mainstream Tanzanian culture, sparking debate about cultural preservation and national identity.
LANGUAGE: Swahili | REGION: East Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Facebook user in the United States posted a comment featuring an adaptation of the ‘two buttons’ meme. The meme showed a cartoon character with a Turkish flag for a face, sweating and hesitating between two red buttons labeled “The Armenian Genocide is a lie” and “The Armenians were terrorists that deserved it.”
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America | LOCATION: United States
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The meme references the politically sensitive and culturally significant issue of the Armenian genocide and its denial by the Turkish government, a topic with deep historical and regional implications. The meme’s use of satire to highlight contradictory denialist narratives was central to the Board’s interpretation.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found the meme fell under Facebook’s exception for content condemning or raising awareness of hatred, interpreting the meme as satirical and critical of Turkish government denial of the Armenian genocide rather than endorsing hateful statements. The majority concluded the content was shared to raise awareness and condemn denialism, while a minority found the harmful generalization about Armenians violated Hate Speech standards.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Criminals NOT immigrants! Lets call them who they are if they DID NOT come in our AMERICA LEGALLY ! They get NO amnesty for breaking the AMERICAN LAW. @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Facebook user in the United States posted in a private group for adults with ADHD, identifying themselves as someone with ADHD and asking for advice on how to talk to a doctor about prescription medication. The user mentioned having been prescribed Xanax but stated that Adderall worked better for them, expressing concern about appearing as drug-seeking if they directly requested Adderall. The post included a content warning about medication and addiction risks and received comments from group members advising on how to discuss the matter with a doctor.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America | LOCATION: United States
RELEVANT POLICY: Restricted Goods and Services
COMPLEXITY: MEDIUM

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found that the post did not violate the Community Standards as it sought medical advice rather than promoting restricted goods. Meta's definitions of non-medical and pharmaceutical drugs were not transparent, and the removal was disproportionate given the lack of direct harm. The Board also noted Meta's failure to provide timely remedy for the user's account restriction.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Realizing the rights of Eritrean refugees in Israel. A new article:https://t.co/0SsTUvgQ6z
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user  IDS the man who smirks at his own policies and implications on his own people y wont he admit its migration that fuels this
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A news article about the Kurdish militant group PKK, shared with a caption calling for the release of Kurdish political prisoners in Turkey, using the hashtag #FreedomForKurdistan
LANGUAGE: Turkish | REGION: Middle East
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A photo of a Libyan artist's mural depicting a former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, with a quote about the importance of forgiveness and reconciliation
LANGUAGE: Arabic | REGION: North Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A video report from a Brazilian news outlet showing a interview with a former member of a leftist guerrilla group, discussing their past actions and ideologies
LANGUAGE: Portuguese | REGION: Latin America
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Glad your having another nice vacation. How's the illegal border crossings, illegal oportunistic migrant entries, tax payer funded hotel rooms for same without a strategic plan going? @user @user @user @user @user @user
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: I don’t know. @user ombudsman could answer the question but nobody cares under this administration. All this does is create chaos for refugees and asylees that are perfectly in status and discourages travel.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Aw 😍😘 I owe you a mustache ride!
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Bengali user shares a satirical article that uses irony to comment on social issues, but the tone and intent may not be immediately clear to all readers, potentially leading to misinterpretation as hate speech
LANGUAGE: Bengali | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Bengali Facebook user shared a news article about the recent Dhaka city council elections, mentioning the name of Hefazat-e-Islam, a radical Islamist group, in a discussion about voter turnout and election results
LANGUAGE: Bengali | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: LIBYA TELLS ITALY: "We don't care how much you pay us, we don't want to take back the migrant wannabes that you reject because “they include terrorists, criminals, and human traffickers" via @user
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Three posts from users in the United States discussing abortion. The first post was an image of outstretched hands with text 'Pro-Abortion Logic' and a statement implying killing as a solution to poverty and unwantedness, posted in a public Facebook group supporting 'sanctity of human life.' The other two posts related to news articles about a South Carolina bill applying homicide laws to abortion, including captions with rhetorical violent language such as 'so pro-life we’ll kill you dead if you get an abortion' and questioning lawmakers' stance on killing.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America | LOCATION: United States
RELEVANT POLICY: Violence and incitement
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The posts referenced the politically sensitive and highly charged topic of abortion in the United States, including a specific South Carolina bill proposing the death penalty for abortion. The use of violent language was rhetorical within the context of abortion debates, which may have been misunderstood by reviewers unfamiliar with the regional and political context.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found that none of the posts could reasonably be interpreted as threats or incitement to violence, as the violent language was used rhetorically or as a figure of speech. The Board noted errors by human reviewers and possible lack of contextual understanding or guidance on abortion-related content, leading to mistaken removals.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Immigrant sex fiend claims he ‘˜did not know it was illegal to grope women’
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Pope Francis: Immigrants Provide ‘˜Enrichment’ to Society, Not ‘˜Threats’
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A prominent Ethiopian activist has been accused of spreading divisive rhetoric against the Oromo people, with some critics labeling it as hate speech, while others see it as a legitimate call for Amhara rights
LANGUAGE: Amharic | REGION: East Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Amharic-language documentary about ancient Ethiopian art featuring nude statues, raising questions about historical context and nudity
LANGUAGE: Amharic | REGION: East Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: This is what Trump supporters call humane smh
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: An Indonesian Instagram post highlighting the struggles of indigenous communities in Papua, featuring a photo of a deforested area, with a caption that 'the government's priorities are skewed, favoring corporations over people'
LANGUAGE: Indonesian | REGION: Southeast Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Violence and Incitement

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: #immigrants #racist #Trump
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Tamil user shares a graphic illustration of a historical figure known for leading a rebellion, with a caption that could be seen as glorifying the figure's use of force or simply commemorating their role in the country's history, depending on the viewer's cultural and historical context
LANGUAGE: Tamil | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Violence and Incitement

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A user posted a video on Facebook providing instructions on how to perform a breast self-examination. The video included an animated depiction of a nude female breast and information about breast cancer awareness, advising viewers to consult a doctor. The post aimed to educate women on early detection of breast cancer.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: Europe | LOCATION: Spain
RELEVANT POLICY: Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity
COMPLEXITY: MEDIUM

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The case involved cultural sensitivities around nudity and health education, particularly the depiction of female breasts for medical awareness. The user noted a gender bias concern, suggesting male breasts would not have been removed, highlighting gender-related cultural factors.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, Bylaws Article 3 Section 1, Bylaws Article 2 Section 2.1.3

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found that the content falls within Meta's allowance for breast cancer awareness under the Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity policy. Meta's removal was inconsistent with its own standards, especially given the educational and health-related nature of the post.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Swahili language tweet linked to a documentary about the Lord's Resistance Army and its activities in the Democratic Republic of Congo, with a comment discussing the need for accountability for war crimes
LANGUAGE: Swahili | REGION: East Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: To use rape as a weapon towards women are far worse than using a bullet. Only other men can help the women in Burma. Stand up for the women
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user Some women are aggressive, promiscuous whores, but all women must try harder not to make men feel uncomf…
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Moroccan social media influencer shares a story of a parent scolding their child in public, with the child crying, and asks followers to weigh in on whether this constitutes acceptable parenting or public shaming
LANGUAGE: Arabic | REGION: North Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Bullying and Harassment

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Voice of America (VOA) Urdu posted an 11-minute documentary on Facebook about Javed Iqbal, a perpetrator who murdered and sexually abused approximately 100 children in Pakistan in the 1990s. The documentary includes disturbing details of the crimes and trial, images of newspaper clips showing faces and names of child victims, and footage of people in tears, likely relatives. The post's caption warned viewers about the content and referenced recent news about a related film. The post was viewed about 21.8 million times and shared about 18,000 times.
LANGUAGE: Urdu | REGION: South Asia | LOCATION: Pakistan
RELEVANT POLICY: Child Sexual Exploitation, Abuse and Nudity
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The case involves sensitive cultural and social issues in Pakistan, including underreported child sexual abuse. The documentary's language (Urdu) and regional context influenced the Board's consideration of public interest versus harm to victims and families.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, Bylaws Article 3 Section 1

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found that although the post violated the Child Sexual Exploitation, Abuse and Nudity Community Standard due to identifiable victims, the public interest in reporting on these crimes outweighed potential harms. The documentary was factual, sensitive, and aimed to raise awareness without sensationalizing, justifying a newsworthiness allowance.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A cartoon depicting a public figure with exaggerated facial features, sparking debate about satire vs hate speech
LANGUAGE: Indonesian | REGION: Southeast Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: The US bill is an illegal endeavour and cannot impact the current situation. It is a part of the “deal of the century” which aims to revoke the Palestinian refugees’ right of return and works hand in hand with the Israeli racist Nation State Law,
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: you know your women are stupid just like you're_ bitch please did i fuck you_ what importance do you have in my life_ are you retarded_ 😏🌹
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A video of a Moroccan rapper criticizing the government's response to a recent flood in Casablanca, with some viewers interpreting the lyrics as a call to violence and others seeing it as a legitimate expression of frustration
LANGUAGE: Arabic | REGION: North Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A social media challenge that involves sharing images of traditional clothing, which some participants use to mock certain ethnic groups and others use to promote cultural exchange
LANGUAGE: Swahili | REGION: East Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A comedic sketch from a popular Indonesian TV show, depicting a fictional character using mock violence to resolve a conflict, but with some potentially offensive stereotypes
LANGUAGE: Indonesian | REGION: Southeast Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Violence and Incitement

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Bangladeshi Facebook user shares a post that appears to glorify a historical figure who is revered by some but considered a nationalist extremist by others, leading to heated debate and allegations of promoting hate speech
LANGUAGE: Bengali | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user Total lie. CONG is the main culprit for influx of illegal migrants both Bangladeshis& Rhongyias. If they deported few, millions came during their tenures& they encouraged Muslim illegal migrants&shooed away Hindu migrants
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A discussion on the role of the Indonesian Ulema Council in shaping national policies, with some users expressing criticism of the council's authority
LANGUAGE: Indonesian | REGION: Southeast Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Facebook user reshared a manipulated video originally posted by another user. The video contained footage from a Serbian protest unrelated to the Duterte arrest, with added captions and audio to make it appear as a pro-Duterte demonstration in the Netherlands. The video included a text overlay saying 'Netherland' and audio of people chanting 'Duterte' with the song 'Bayan Ko' playing in Tagalog. The post was shared hundreds of times and received about 100,000 views.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: Southeast Asia | LOCATION: Philippines
RELEVANT POLICY: Misinformation
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The video used the song 'Bayan Ko,' a significant cultural symbol from anti-martial law protests in the Philippines during the 1980s, and referenced former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte's extradition to the International Criminal Court, a politically sensitive event in the Philippines.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, Bylaws Article 3 Section 1

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW_WITH_LABEL

Reasoning: The Board agreed that the post did not violate Meta's Misinformation policy as it did not include prohibited content such as voting misinformation. However, due to the manipulated nature of the video and its potential to deceive during a significant public event, the Board found that Meta should have applied a 'High-Risk' label to the content to inform users of its nature.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: UGH! Fake Christians really out here trying to take away our rights!! IF YOU CARE SO MUCH ABOUT LIFE THEN FIX THE ALREADY BROKEN FOSTER CARE SYSTEM AND WELCOME REFUGEES WITH OPEN ARMS. FOLLOWER OF CHRIST?? WHILE NOT LOVING YOUR NEIGHBORS? YIKES.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Tanzanian user shares a post criticizing a local imam's sermon, which some commenters defend as a legitimate critique of religious leadership and others condemn as an attack on Islam
LANGUAGE: Swahili | REGION: East Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: I love how I wasted 5 years on a stupid cunt. Only to find true love with the beautiful woman I was with before that. Life's funny sometimes
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Fifteen users posted breast cancer awareness content featuring adult nudity and sexual activity on Facebook and Instagram. The posts were removed by Meta for violating the Adult nudity and sexual activity standard.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America, Europe, East Asia | LOCATION: Canada, United Kingdom, United States, Portugal, Belgium, France, Italy, Germany, Japan, Czech Republic
RELEVANT POLICY: Adult nudity and sexual activity
COMPLEXITY: MEDIUM

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The content related to breast cancer awareness, a health and gender equality issue, which is culturally sensitive and important in many countries. The Board considered the cultural significance of nudity in a medical and awareness context.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found that the breast cancer awareness content featuring adult nudity was important for health and sex and gender equality awareness and did not violate Meta's standards. The Board emphasized freedom of expression and the health context of the posts.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Absolutely shameful 27 month sentence!! Woman jailed for false rape allegation against police officer
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: How retarded must you be to have a skank shave your legs 🤦🏻♀ #jeremykyle
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A video of a local festival with a commentary saying 'this event is a ploy by the ruling party to distract us from real issues, let's boycott it and take to the streets'
LANGUAGE: Hindi | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Violence and Incitement

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Me flirting- So tell me about your father...
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user If immigration will not stopped in Europe, the refugees will destroy the welfare. This means streetfights and dead on European streets.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Yoruba-language video discussing the legacy of a traditional king who led a rebellion against colonial powers, with some commenters praising his bravery and others condemning his actions as violent
LANGUAGE: Yoruba | REGION: West Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Sri Lankan user posted a Tamil-language song that includes a verse about the Tamil independence movement, which was flagged as hate speech against the Sinhalese majority
LANGUAGE: Tamil | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: An Instagram user posted a six-second video of a political candidate in Pakistan's 2024 elections giving a speech praising former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, with text overlay accusing the candidate of 'crossing all limits of kufr' and labeling him a non-believer according to Islamic teachings.
LANGUAGE: Urdu | REGION: South Asia | LOCATION: Pakistan
RELEVANT POLICY: Coordinating Harm and Promoting Crime
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

CULTURAL CONTEXT: Blasphemy is a criminal offense in Pakistan with significant social and legal consequences. Accusations can lead to serious harm, making the context highly sensitive. The term 'outing' as used in Meta's policy does not translate well culturally or linguistically in Pakistan, causing confusion about the policy's application to public figures accused of blasphemy.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, Bylaws Article 3 Section 1

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Reasoning: The Board upheld Meta's removal decision due to the potential for imminent harm in the sensitive context of Pakistan's 2024 elections and the serious risks associated with blasphemy accusations. However, the Board noted that the policy's use of the term 'outing' is confusing and does not clearly apply to public figures accused of blasphemy, suggesting Meta update its policy for clarity.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: Two Facebook posts containing videos of puppies that appeared to be for sale. The first post from Australia showed two puppies in a pen with breed information, an Instagram handle, and business details indicating a specialist dog breeder. The second post from the Philippines showed six puppies with captions indicating they were "open for reservation" and included medical information and birth dates, inviting contact for more details.
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: Australia, Southeast Asia | LOCATION: Australia, Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore
RELEVANT POLICY: Regulated goods
COMPLEXITY: MEDIUM

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The Board noted that the term "brick-and-mortar" used in the policy is outdated and not universally understood, suggesting a need for clearer language to accommodate diverse cultural and regional understandings of legitimate business operations.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The Board found that Meta correctly applied its policy to protect users from fraud by banning peer-to-peer sales of animals but allowing sales by established businesses. The Australian post was restored because it represented a legitimate business sale, while the Southeast Asian post was removed as it was peer-to-peer selling without evidence of a legitimate business.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: @user @user This old bitch needs to go out to pasture! Dig a hole too racist
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A video of a local militia leader in Egypt giving a speech about community protection, with some viewers interpreting it as a call to violence while others see it as a legitimate form of self-defense
LANGUAGE: Arabic | REGION: North Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: “The verification will play a key role in establishing refugees’ identities and their declared places of origin in Myanmar. It will help to preserve their right to voluntarily return home, if and when they decide that the conditions are right to do so.”
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: An undercount would allow the federal government to direct resources away from California, which has the largest #immigrant population in the country.  #Census takers could miss counting millions of #Californians, researchers say
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: An Indonesian post condemning the deforestation practices of a specific corporation, using language that could be interpreted as an attack on the corporation's Chinese-Indonesian owners or as a genuine environmental concern
LANGUAGE: Indonesian | REGION: Southeast Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: REMOVE

Content violates policy and must be removed.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: So if your reading this and I know you are .. STOP HITTING ME UP YO DICK LIDDO AND NOW THE WORLD KNOWS 😭🤦🏽♀
LANGUAGE: English | REGION: North America
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Facebook user posted two images on a Facebook group’s page. The first image shows Elizaldy Salcedo Co, a Filipino politician, and his family, including his minor children. The second image shows an airplane flying over water. The caption, in Tagalog and English, states that the children have a Gulfstream airplane in their name and questions how it was purchased. The caption includes phrases implying a vow to expose corruption, such as “At the expense of your family’s safety and security. Right, Zaldy?” and “This is the price Zaldy … your family.” It ends with the Tagalog phrase “Hindi ka namin patahimikin,” interpreted as “We will not leave you alone.”
LANGUAGE: Tagalog and English | REGION: Southeast Asia | LOCATION: Philippines
RELEVANT POLICY: Violence and incitement
COMPLEXITY: MEDIUM

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The post involved a Filipino politician and used Tagalog language with culturally specific phrases. Linguistic experts confirmed the phrase interpreted as a threat was actually a vow to expose corruption, reflecting local language nuances. The case also involved balancing children’s rights with political accountability in the Philippine context.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ESCALATE

Reasoning: The Board found that the language did not contain a direct or veiled threat but was a vow to expose corruption by a public figure. While children’s rights and safety must be safeguarded, public officials cannot use these protections to avoid scrutiny. References to children in corruption allegations do not silence such claims when children are used as proxies.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: The Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy states that sharing the official communications of a dangerous organization designated by Facebook is a form of substantive support. The policy, however, includes news reporting and neutral discussion exceptions. The company applied the news reporting exception to Al Jazeera’s post and erroneously failed to apply the neutral discussion exception, which it later corrected. The Board concludes that the removing of the content in this case was not necessary as it did not reduce offline harm and instead resulted in an unjustified restriction on freedom of expression on a public interest issue.
LANGUAGE: Arabic | REGION: North Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Reasoning: The right to freedom of opinion and expression: Article 19, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR); Human Rights Committee,General Comment No. 34, (2011); UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression,A/74/486(2019); Human Rights Council, Resolution on the Safety of Journalists,A/HRC/RES/45/18(2020); UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967,A/75/532(2020);The right to non-discrimination: ICCPR Articles 2 and 26;The right to life: ICCPR Article 6; Human Rights Committee,General Comment No. 36, (2


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A blog post discussing the role of traditional spiritual leaders in modern society, with over 20,000 reads and 1,000 comments, blurring the lines between freedom of expression and respect for religious authority
LANGUAGE: Yoruba | REGION: West Africa
RELEVANT POLICY: Hate Speech

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A popular media outlet affiliated with the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) shared a two-minute audio clip on its Facebook page. The post's caption in Sorani Kurdish alleges the audio is a recorded conversation between brothers Bafel and Qubad Talabani, members of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), discussing plans to rig the October 2024 parliamentary elections in Iraqi Kurdistan. The audio features two men speaking with an English voiceover and Sorani Kurdish and English subtitles, discussing guaranteed seats and strategies to make election rigging appear legitimate. The post has about 200,000 views and the media outlet's Facebook page has about 4,000,000 followers.
LANGUAGE: Sorani Kurdish | REGION: Middle East | LOCATION: Iraq
RELEVANT POLICY: Fraud and deception
COMPLEXITY: HIGH

CULTURAL CONTEXT: The case involves a politically sensitive and highly contested election in Iraqi Kurdistan, with content in Sorani Kurdish and references to local political parties (KDP and PUK). The linguistic and regional context influenced the Board's emphasis on providing labels in the local language and addressing regional political sensitivities.
⚑ Cultural context played a significant role in this case.

LEGAL REFERENCES: Charter Article 2 Section 1, Bylaws Article 3 Section 1

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW_WITH_LABEL

Reasoning: The Board found Meta's enforcement of its manipulated media policy inconsistent, particularly its failure to label all instances of the same manipulated content. The Board emphasized the need for Meta to invest in technology to identify and label manipulated audio and video at scale and to provide labels in local languages to properly inform users.


[System]
You are a culturally-aware content moderation decision agent for a global social media platform.

You must evaluate social media content considering:
- Cultural and linguistic context of the post's origin community
- Meta's Community Standards and applicable policy clauses
- Real-world harm potential vs. legitimate speech rights
- Cross-cultural nuance that Western-trained AI systems typically miss

Available actions:
- ALLOW: Content is legitimate and should remain
- REMOVE: Content violates policy and must be removed
- ALLOW_WITH_LABEL: Allow but add a warning/sensitivity label
- ESCALATE: Refer to human reviewer (genuinely ambiguous high-stakes case)
- RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION: Reduce reach without full removal

Always provide your decision followed by a concise justification.

[User]
POST: A Hindi-language discussion on the Indian freedom fighter Bhagat Singh, with some users drawing parallels between his actions and those of modern-day groups, but the post itself being a historical tribute
LANGUAGE: Hindi | REGION: South Asia
RELEVANT POLICY: Dangerous Individuals and Organizations

What is the correct moderation decision? Choose one: ALLOW | REMOVE | ALLOW_WITH_LABEL | ESCALATE | RESTRICT_DISTRIBUTION
Provide your decision and a brief justification.

[Assistant]
Decision: ALLOW

Content does not violate the applicable policy.