Transcripts_Notes/01-Transcripts/2015-06-19-CheckoutCall.txt

Let's go over the IRS 1099A form. We will be using them some different scenarios. You also need a 1041 form, an income tax return for estates and trusts.

You should read the 1985 memo from the IRS Commissioner, EveryTaxIsRefundable-2.pdf. I added a box at the bottom. This memo said that the 1040X was to be used until a new form was designed. That new form was the 1041 which came out in 1986.

You will need to have 1) a Foreign Grantor Trust EIN (FGT) and 2) an Estate EIN. That is the two entities where your assets are held. 

The corporation that was set up in 1871 was the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (copyrighted in England). Each state has the same thing, a Fidelity and Guaranty Company.

The churches, especially the Catholic Church, has a Fidelity and Guaranty Company. Most of the major church organizations (which are 501(c)(3) organizations have set up a Fidelity and Guaranty Company.

The Fidelity side is an insurance policy, a whole life policy for loss of life with the value of $11.2 million. That are paid up. They wrote bonds to fund it against the collateral of the assets of our birthing estate that was recorded into the county records where you were born.

The Certificate Of Live Bwo sets of rightsirth was an estoppel over our assets to prevent us from utilizing them. That was accomplished by the confiscation of the gold that took place in 1933. 

All of the constitutional amendments since the 14th, except for perhaps the 17th where they allow the senators to be voted in by the people, could not be ratified by the states because they were taking rights away from the people. But if the states wanted to give up their rights and allow the people to vote the senators in, that was their perogative. The senators were original meant to protect the rights of the state.

In the Bill Of Rights there are two sets of right established, the states' rights and the people's rights. The people's rights are to be protected by Congress and the states' right protected by the Senate.

The right of women to vote was an infringement on the rights of man, so it is an invaled right. So the amendment is invalid because the states have no authority to pass giving up the rights of a man in this country. That's why the original 13th amendment had to come off the books because they didn't have the authority to give up the people's rights. They can give up their rights but not the people's rights.

So every amendment since the 14th has been an infringement on the rights of man.

The man was supposed to have the estate. The woman was to come into the man's estate. If a woman was unmarried, she reverted back to the protection of her father. That is biblical law which has existed for aeons. 

The first estoppel ocurred when a man married a women and came into his estate. He placed an estoppel against her consorting with other men because he was not going to be liable for her bringing another man's child into his estate making him responsible for it. 

If the woman wanted to be with someone else, she was to leave this estate and enter the other. She got divorced and took her dowry to the other man.

That was the law.

The states also did not have the authority to give up the child's rights at age 18 to protection from the father until age 21 in exchange for a right to vote. By allowing the 18 year old to vote, you are nullifying the parent's right and power to vote. They have nullified an man's voting power.

The 16th amendment was only ratified by two states. The states had no such authority. Only the individual can give up that right, not the state.

But when you filled out the 1040 form and signed it, you were essentially ratifying the 16th amendment unknowingly. You can revoke that. What that IRS memo and the court case said was that you can go back and revoke your giving up that right because it was a fraudulent amendment. It was done in fraud like all the amendment since the 14th, fraudulent infringements on our rights set out in the Bill Of Rights.

Not only are amendments fraudulent but so are the estoppels places on our assets. Without your knowledge, you had life insurance policies placed upon you. Your driver's license has a loss of life Fidelity policy for $11.2 million. That's why they can tell you to wear a seat belt because they have an estoppel trying to protect that insurance policy they are carrying so if you die, they have to pay it out. So they want to keep you from dying. 

Now there are other situations that try to get you killed so they can cash the policy in. The people don't know they have these insurance policies. We knew the military had placed an insurance policy on every soldier of around $10 million. Yet they still had the soldier pay for a $30,000 life policy to be given to the wife or whoever if you died in combat. The soldier would have been entitled to the Fidelity policy also had they known about it. Th $10 million was really $11.2 million as are all these lose of life policies.

We've gone into the Fidelity website and every one came up to $11.2M.

The Roman Catholic Church abd probably the other 501(c)(3) churches do this also. They also have  Fidelity and Guaranty companies. When you get baptized you get a certificate, a loss of life policy for $11.2M. Also the Catholics have confirmation at age 12  whereby you become a soldier of the church, so you get a military loss of life policy for another $11.2M. If you get married in the church the man and wife each get another $11.2M policy placed upon them so that if one of the parties die, the funds will take care of the family.

I have been very close to understanding this, but enough information has come to light in to past two weeks so we can put it together.

We found in Black's Law a court case where estoppel against estoppel is addressed. Twas Stewary vs. United States Fidelity and Guaranty company.Fidelity and Guaranty companiey.

The Fidelity side is where we need our Foreign Grantor Trust EIN. The Guaranty side is where we need our Estate EIN.

(15:27)