| Patrick: the BK. OK? And then also about the securities act of 1933. OK? The whole thing about the BK was total fraud; OK? The destruction of America was basically done by the Securities Act of 1933. They basically came in and basically put a secondary easement against us and our property. OK? Read the last document that I just posted up: �My eminent domain-BK case statement�. OK? The answer is right there when you see it. It is about servitus; slavery, slave, servitude, an easement; a servitude. And basically you cannot�there cannot be an easement upon an easement. You have the right, you have an implied easement by your birth; you used your body out here prior to them putting their contract into place. So you had the first easement on your body, on your physical person and all of your inheritance. All you have to do is come in and condemn this; everything about easement leads into eminent domain. We have the public use of our property. We can condemn and see they are holding our assets in their -private property holdings. So we are coming in and taking our private�our public-use property back from their holding (of our public-use property) in private property. This is all addressed in the constitution and also basically in article 5 of the constitution about eminent domain. We have to come in and basically take control of our property by condemning their contracts and taking our easements back; our public easements back, and it is a public right that we have, to come in and take that back. In the republic form of government, basically the supreme power resides in the body of the people, the government, private property; property of a government or a government body. You are the real government and you are a governmental body. Read the definitions that I put up there, then it will make (you have) an understanding of the second paragraph that I put up there, after my �be warned that I will file charges of securities fraud against the BK court� is that �it therefore stands that my original birthing implied easement and / lien is my natural right to condemn and exercise my public right of eminent domain over any corporate contractors� private property that is being held under the contracted secondary servitus easements or securities known as the collateral trust certificates.� As per the law, there cannot be a lawful secondary easement lien upon a pre-existing easement lien. We have the first easement/lien over our inheritance, over our entitlements. It is implied by our living before they came along and set up their security contract. Then their easement that they had was only supposed to be for an easement for years, an easement created to endure for a specified period of time: 21 and 25. | |
| But nobody that I know of has used anything out here about eminent domain or about the right of easement. And you can file your easement charges into the Article 3 Federal district court or into the circuit court if need be. Their BK action is to be condemned. And basically when you condemn something you are adjudicating the guilty, to pass sentence upon a person convicted of crime and then to appropriate property for public use. We are the public. We are the sovereignty public body in this country. You can read the definitions about that. Public: belonging to the entire community, unrestricted in participation. Noun: the people. There it is, right there. And their court is a private court, that is why they don�t hear you. We condemn their private court, BK court. It is not for our benefit, it is for theirs, so it is a private court for the corporation; they are operating as a private enterprise which is totally forbidden by the constitutions of the state(s). Condemn the action. Do not give them the credence that they want you to try and give them. And see, some of this stuff is self-executing. Like the 5th amendment (actually article 5 of the constitution) out here about right of eminent domain. That is the problem, we have been so damn close; we know that we�re right, but we were using the wrong authority out here in coming forward to claim our stuff, and it was all under eminent domain, our public right of eminent domain. And then when you read the definitions a little more you�ll see that basically we can go after all of the assets when we do--the exercise of eminent domain is not limited to real property, governments may also take personal property, governments may also acquire intangible property such as contract rights, patents, trade secrets, and copyrights. In other words, we can take every fucking thing they have. Their trade secrets, and put them out to the open public. Their fraudulent patents and copyrights. And their intangible property such as contract rights. They really have no rights. They have violated their trust out here, under these collateral trust certificates that they gave us. So we condemn them. And we can basically put this through, if you place them on notice, under this notice of eminent domain; if they do not comply then we will take it to the article 3 district court or article 3 circuit court. But that�s it. It is that easy, and see everybody was worried about this HJR-192. That ain�t where the real problem was; the real problem was basically the 1933 Chapter 38 securities act. And basically section 11 in there which addresses that basically they did not give us full disclosure on those contracts. So it is very easy to condemn their contracts. But everybody has been having this all wrong; yeah, the BK is a big deal but basically that was not the deal that they were really operating out here, because it happened about a week and a half before when they created the 1933 Securities Act. People were looking in the wrong rabbit hole. Yes it was all in 1933, and then basically these courts that they set up, these were corporate, private courts, that basically Roosevelt set up in 1938 and then they had to revamp them and re-institute the BK court system in 1978, for their protection. | |
| OK, read over the documents, read over the definitions of the words, try and get your head around what I�m saying here. Now you ought to be able to stand up in any of their courts and basically condemn the court for their action and you claim eminent domain over your property, your public domain property. OK, open it up for questions, Tom. | |
| Yeah, that�s the problem, most people read all of this stuff totally wrong. Like all of these foreclosures or eminent domain to where this government comes in as a private corporation trying to take your property away from you� you are the superior government! OK? And that is one of the key things; eminent domain was one of the key things that basically the founding fathers wanted into the constitution was the right of eminent domain but it was for the right of the people. So that the people could claim their property for their public usage. | |
| Tom: that is the part we did not see is that we can exercise eminent domain, not them. | |
| Patrick: We are the only ones that really have the right to exercise eminent domain, not this corporate government. They can come in and they can try and buy the property but basically in some cases, they are stuck; if the people do not want to sell to them, they cannot be forced into it. How many times have you seen some of these movies to where basically like in a big city, there is this one little house standing in there and then basically there are skyscrapers built all around it because they could not get that house under their eminent domain charges. OK, anybody got any questions? | |
| Tom: This paragraph that you posted on your skype and I reposted on the group skype, do we put that in the second paragraph of our case statement? | |
| Patrick: Put it wherever you want to! Damn it Tom I told you: you are supposed to be the damn creator; I am not going to create shit for you; you create your own shit. I give you the idea, now you run with it and put it into action. Write it up how you want it to say. I am not perfect in any of this regards. If you guys can�t access and ask a question, hang up, call back in again, and then you ought to be able to ask the question. | |
| Caller: How are you? (Pissed) Yes I know you�re fine just calm down. OK? I think that all the things you are saying are true; however, it is going to be hard as hell trying to get a lot of people to realize that they are losing everything because they are not enforcing�to change. | |
| Patrick: Because you have to be the comdemner; you are the government, we the people are the true government; we have to condemn these corporations out here, and then it comes in under our right of eminent domain, and also under the definition that basically is one of the maxims of law that you cannot have an easement upon an easement! | |
| Caller: That�s interesting; I was wondering� I took something similar to what you were saying, I guess, into city hall; how do you think that it would fare? | |
| Well basically they will try to run away from it if they can. | |
| Caller: OK, well I am going to try and see. | |
| But basically see the thing is, everything like I said previously; all these charges and everything are going into the BK court. And what is the BK court? It is a private court for the corporations. And you have to condemn their actions. We condemn it! It is�what was it called in the Bible?�condemnable action or whatever. | |
| See we are taking the private property that they�re claiming is theirs; they are the ones that are claiming private property, and we are claiming it back for our public usage. Condemnation: the taking of private property for public use through the exercise of the power of eminent domain. And see nobody has used right of eminent domain in any of their court cases that I know of, at least I have not heard anybody using that and winning any court cases. You can go in and read about people that have had eminent domain court cases filed against them, and that the people ended up winning, in the process, to back them down, or to get more compensation in the process. But they were not using the power of eminent domain in the right regards, they should have done a countersuit for THEIR right of eminent domain. You claim that mortgage, that property that is under mortgage; under the right of eminent domain. You gave them a contract, the contract was supposed to pay for that property. So that property has been paid for, so now it is yours, now you have to claim it back from the bank under right of eminent domain. Same thing with your checking account; they are claiming it as their private property so that they can turn around and write bonds against it, but it is not their property; it is our property. OK, anybody else? | |
| Does this change anything that we might have in with the BK courts already? | |
| Yeah, you are going to have to condemn that BK court and claim all your shit under eminent domain! And that there cannot be an easement upon an easement, and see that is what they did under the Securities Act of 1933; they placed an easement under that collateral trust certificate against your natural, original easement�implied easement. Yours is not in any record book. So it is all implied! Read the last part: �to create an easement, by implication, there must be 3 items: a separation of title, a use before the separation, so long continued obvious and manifest as to show the use was meant to be permanent�, so there was a timeframe between your being born and that CoLB being issued! You were using that! You were breathing on your own; you had the right to everything that your body was producing�even though most of it was shit. And third, �a use essential to the beneficial enjoyment of the land, granted or retained�. You have a �use essential� to your beneficial enjoyment of your LAND, your BODY. So basically that last part of that implied easement, is covered. And it is in favor of a grantor or grantee�you! Therefore, you have the superior easement. First in line, first in time. OK, anybody else have any problems with this? | |
| Caller: I was working on my flow chart to try and better understand the whole bonding process today, and I came up with kind of an XYZ function; basically the passport, DL, and marriage license, they are kind of like cue cards, they control what I call your X,Y,Z functions. A passport is your license to travel or basically occupy space; the DL is your license to operate or move on yourself in the y-plane, actually the x and y-plane. And the marriage license is actually the license to intercourse, for function or interact with others, and I call that the Z-plane. So the x-plane is space, the y-plane is motion, and the z-plane is function. And basically everything falls under those 3 categories and I sent you the flow chart. The tax�when you pay to use basically their property to exist, like for instance you pay property tax, they charge you money on your location or your space and that�s your x-plane. They charge you a car registration fee for your locomotion or your motion to move around and that�s your y-plane, and they charge you tax on your labor, which is your energy output, that�s your z-plane, and they charge you tax on goods, that�s your energy input, stuff that you consume, that�s also your z-plane. And then you are paying a penalty on those x-y-z planes. Like for instance, for space violation they have building and zoning codes, and that deals with the x-plane; for traffic tickets which is the motion violations; that is your y-plane. | |
| Patrick: OK, you need to stop right there. OK? You need to go back and read �Stopping The American Living Name Identity Theft�. OK? They set up contracts, and every contract has 4 parts to it. You have the contractor: the debtor in possession, holding�and now we see that they are holding�an easement, over something that we own. OK? Some collateral. You have the surety, or the slave, in the process, and that is the account number. Then you have the owner of that contract; we the living. And then the 4th part is basically the contract itself. OK? A 3-sided pyramid has a 4th side, just like any contract does, it has 4 items. The base of the contract is the 4th side; the base of a contract is basically the contract itself which was never fully disclosed to us. And that is basically what I am talking about under the Securities Act of 1933 section 11; they never gave us full disclosure, and what does that Securities Act say in the process? Basically it says� yeah, if you go into section 11 of that Securities Act, it talks about �in case any part of the registration statement, when such part became effected contained an untrue statement of material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring such security unless it is proved that at the time of the acquisition he knew that such untruth or omission may either at law or in equity in any court of competent jurisdiction sue�. And that basically covers your DL, certificate of title to vehicle/house, marriage certificate, baptismal certificate with the church, whatever you want. Did you get full disclosure? Basically the church was supposed to be there to set off all debts; that is what baptism was supposed to be about; the churches were supposed to do that through the system. Read these documents, read the definitions that I posted up there because this is really where it is all at, and most of these gurus out here never had a full understanding about eminent domain whatsoever�or easement. Anybody else? | |
| Caller: Somebody is snoring on the call. (Patrick can�t hear them so they must be a sound sleeper). | |
| Caller: If we have already filed our BK into the district BK court for my district (13), with this new information on the eminent domain and I can now go back and file this bottom part of the documents you just put up today, I think, to all bankrupt officials; should this be included, I redo the entire communication again? | |
| Patrick: You can put a notice of condemnation of that court as a private court into place and just place a notice in against them and basically say that if you do not comply with what I previously submitted, as my right of eminent domain claim, I will take you into an article 3 federal or circuit court because you are just a damn private corporation and I am coming after the property you are holding in your private�whatever. Act like the owner; yeah, that�s what we�ve got to do is act like the real owner; they are just a fiction. And when we use eminent domain and easement in the process, when you read these definitions I think you will understand where I am coming from. | |
| Caller: I do appreciate all the work that you have done; it has taken an awful lot of time and energy� | |
| Patrick: Just put it to work; it is all right here; like I said, the founding fathers gave us our out, our right of eminent domain. People badmouth the founding fathers so damn much I am getting sick and tired of them. There are certain things that these corporations can and cannot do. And that is what you had to really look for; what could they not do if you had the right before they did, they cannot take that right away from you. And you�ve got natural rights out here up the ass. Not many of them, but basically the few that you have basically are powerful. OK, nobody else have any questions? Well, make it a short call then tonight, Tom. Talk to you later. OK, good night. | |
| Tom: Thank you Patrick, I see we can do this as a notice, part of our enforcement, and if they don�t act in BK, we move on and do the eminent domain to them. | |
| Patrick: Yeah, and make it a notice to them, say basically� if you have already filed your stuff into the BK court now put this notice in as your right of eminent domain and you are claiming all that property under your right of eminent domain. | |
| Tom: If I have not (yet submitted into BK yet)? | |
| Patrick: Put that in your letter. | |
| Tom: I put it into the case, got it. | |
| Patrick: OK? OK, later; good night. | |