test/Task6_Longitudinal_Temporal_Diagnosis/d.csv

Task,Subtask,VolumeName,Question,Answer,QuestionType,AnswerChoice,Choice A,Choice B,Choice C,Choice D
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"Historical interlobular septal thickening status: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has interlobular septal thickening changed from past sequences to the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"mosaic attenuation pattern progression: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes mosaic attenuation pattern?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"Before now, pleural effusion showed [0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the current CT show about pleural effusion based on earlier sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"bronchiectasis trend was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. How is bronchiectasis classified now using past sequence data?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for consolidation: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. What is the current status of consolidation based on previous sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of arterial wall calcification: [0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is arterial wall calcification in the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for pulmonary fibrotic sequela: [0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of pulmonary fibrotic sequela?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"In past, lung opacity was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes lung opacity?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"Prior peribronchial thickening timeline: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of peribronchial thickening?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"Previous atelectasis states: [0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. What does atelectasis currently represent, based on past sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"emphysema over time: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the current CT show about emphysema based on earlier sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"Previous lymphadenopathy states: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. How has lymphadenopathy evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"pericardial effusion condition history: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How has pericardial effusion progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"cardiomegaly condition history: [0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for cardiomegaly considering its sequence history?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for lung nodule: [1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is lung nodule in the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier hiatal hernia sequences: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of hiatal hernia?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1019_d_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed coronary artery wall calcification as: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. How has coronary artery wall calcification evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"emphysema sequence was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. How does emphysema appear now compared to its sequence history?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed arterial wall calcification as: [1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. How has arterial wall calcification evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"Prior lung nodule timeline: [1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of lung nodule?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"pulmonary fibrotic sequela trend was: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. How is pulmonary fibrotic sequela classified now using past sequence data?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"cardiomegaly trend was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has cardiomegaly changed from past sequences to the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier coronary artery wall calcification sequences: [1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of coronary artery wall calcification?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed lymphadenopathy as: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes lymphadenopathy?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"atelectasis progression: [0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes atelectasis?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier CTs showed interlobular septal thickening as: [0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. What lesion category applies to interlobular septal thickening in the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"Historical pleural effusion status: [0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has pleural effusion changed from past sequences to the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"consolidation had: [0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. What lesion category applies to consolidation in the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"bronchiectasis had: [0, 1, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. How does bronchiectasis appear now compared to its sequence history?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for lung opacity: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. What is the current status of lung opacity based on previous sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"mosaic attenuation pattern sequence was: [1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of mosaic attenuation pattern?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"hiatal hernia over time: [1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the current CT show about hiatal hernia based on earlier sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier peribronchial thickening sequences: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of peribronchial thickening?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1041_d_1.nii.gz,"Historical pericardial effusion status: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of pericardial effusion?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"lymphadenopathy had: [0, 1, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. What type of lesion is lymphadenopathy now, given its temporal sequence?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier consolidation sequences: [0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the current CT show about consolidation based on earlier sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for emphysema: [1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How has emphysema progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier lung nodule sequences: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes lung nodule?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"interlobular septal thickening condition history: [0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. How has interlobular septal thickening evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"Historical pericardial effusion status: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. What lesion category applies to pericardial effusion in the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"Previous hiatal hernia states: [0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is hiatal hernia in the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier CTs showed atelectasis as: [1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for atelectasis considering its sequence history?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"bronchiectasis over time: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of bronchiectasis?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"Before now, lung opacity showed [1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. How has lung opacity evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed mosaic attenuation pattern as: [0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of mosaic attenuation pattern?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of peribronchial thickening: [0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How has peribronchial thickening progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for arterial wall calcification: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of arterial wall calcification?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"In past, pulmonary fibrotic sequela was: [0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. What does pulmonary fibrotic sequela currently represent, based on past sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"coronary artery wall calcification sequence was: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What is the current CT assessment of coronary artery wall calcification based on prior sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for pleural effusion: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is pleural effusion in the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_1067_d_1.nii.gz,"cardiomegaly trend was: [0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. How does cardiomegaly appear now compared to its sequence history?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"atelectasis trend was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How has atelectasis progressed according to its temporal sequence?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for emphysema: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is emphysema in the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier arterial wall calcification sequences: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What is the current CT assessment of arterial wall calcification based on prior sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of lung nodule: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for lung nodule considering its sequence history?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"pleural effusion over time: [0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of pleural effusion?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"Historical pulmonary fibrotic sequela status: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. How has pulmonary fibrotic sequela evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"lung opacity progression: [1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. What is the current status of lung opacity based on previous sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for consolidation: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has consolidation changed from past sequences to the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier lymphadenopathy sequences: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes lymphadenopathy?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"pericardial effusion over time: [0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of pericardial effusion?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"cardiomegaly over time: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. What type of lesion is cardiomegaly now, given its temporal sequence?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"bronchiectasis had: [0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the current CT show about bronchiectasis based on earlier sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"mosaic attenuation pattern sequence was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of mosaic attenuation pattern?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier CTs showed interlobular septal thickening as: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes interlobular septal thickening?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"Prior peribronchial thickening timeline: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. How is peribronchial thickening classified now using past sequence data?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"Prior hiatal hernia timeline: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. What does hiatal hernia currently represent, based on past sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_118_d_1.nii.gz,"coronary artery wall calcification progression: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for coronary artery wall calcification considering its sequence history?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for lymphadenopathy: [0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has lymphadenopathy changed from past sequences to the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"Previous emphysema states: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is emphysema in the current CT?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"consolidation sequence was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes consolidation?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"cardiomegaly over time: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. What does cardiomegaly currently represent, based on past sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"pericardial effusion progression: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is pericardial effusion in the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"Prior coronary artery wall calcification timeline: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How has coronary artery wall calcification progressed according to its temporal sequence?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"Prior hiatal hernia timeline: [0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. How is hiatal hernia classified now using past sequence data?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for lung nodule: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. What does lung nodule currently represent, based on past sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"Historical peribronchial thickening status: [0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. How does peribronchial thickening appear now compared to its sequence history?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"pleural effusion trend was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of pleural effusion?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"bronchiectasis sequence was: [0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. What lesion category applies to bronchiectasis in the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier arterial wall calcification sequences: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for arterial wall calcification considering its sequence history?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"interlobular septal thickening had: [0, 1, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What is the current CT assessment of interlobular septal thickening based on prior sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"Historical mosaic attenuation pattern status: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the current CT show about mosaic attenuation pattern based on earlier sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of lung opacity: [0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is lung opacity in the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"pulmonary fibrotic sequela trend was: [1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of pulmonary fibrotic sequela?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_163_d_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for atelectasis: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. How has atelectasis evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"Historical pericardial effusion status: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. How does pericardial effusion appear now compared to its sequence history?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"coronary artery wall calcification sequence was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. What lesion category applies to coronary artery wall calcification in the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"hiatal hernia had: [0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What is the current CT assessment of hiatal hernia based on prior sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"Historical lymphadenopathy status: [1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What is the current CT assessment of lymphadenopathy based on prior sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier CTs showed emphysema as: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. What type of lesion is emphysema now, given its temporal sequence?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for arterial wall calcification: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has arterial wall calcification changed from past sequences to the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"Historical lung nodule status: [0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. What type of lesion is lung nodule now, given its temporal sequence?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for pulmonary fibrotic sequela: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. What does pulmonary fibrotic sequela currently represent, based on past sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for consolidation: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of consolidation?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of pleural effusion: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is pleural effusion in the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"mosaic attenuation pattern condition history: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How has mosaic attenuation pattern progressed according to its temporal sequence?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"Previous peribronchial thickening states: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. How has peribronchial thickening evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"cardiomegaly trend was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of cardiomegaly?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"Before now, atelectasis showed [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of atelectasis?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"Before now, bronchiectasis showed [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the current CT show about bronchiectasis based on earlier sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed interlobular septal thickening as: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes interlobular septal thickening?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_258_d_1.nii.gz,"In past, lung opacity was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for lung opacity considering its sequence history?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"arterial wall calcification over time: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What is the current CT assessment of arterial wall calcification based on prior sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"lung nodule trend was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What is the current CT assessment of lung nodule based on prior sequences?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"Prior pericardial effusion timeline: [0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for pericardial effusion considering its sequence history?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for coronary artery wall calcification: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. What does coronary artery wall calcification currently represent, based on past sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for hiatal hernia: [1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for hiatal hernia considering its sequence history?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"lymphadenopathy trend was: [1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is lymphadenopathy in the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"emphysema trend was: [0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. What does emphysema currently represent, based on past sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"Historical atelectasis status: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How has atelectasis progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of pulmonary fibrotic sequela: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for pulmonary fibrotic sequela considering its sequence history?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"Previous peribronchial thickening states: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is peribronchial thickening in the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for consolidation: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How has consolidation progressed according to its temporal sequence?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"Before now, bronchiectasis showed [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. How has bronchiectasis evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"interlobular septal thickening had: [1, 1, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. How has interlobular septal thickening evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"Historical lung opacity status: [1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is lung opacity in the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"cardiomegaly progression: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. What type of lesion is cardiomegaly now, given its temporal sequence?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"pleural effusion sequence was: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How has pleural effusion progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_457_d_1.nii.gz,"mosaic attenuation pattern condition history: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. What does mosaic attenuation pattern currently represent, based on past sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"consolidation had: [0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. What does consolidation currently represent, based on past sequences?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"lung opacity sequence was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for lung opacity considering its sequence history?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"interlobular septal thickening progression: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. What does interlobular septal thickening currently represent, based on past sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"bronchiectasis condition history: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. How is bronchiectasis classified now using past sequence data?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of peribronchial thickening: [0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. What is the current status of peribronchial thickening based on previous sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for coronary artery wall calcification: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. How does coronary artery wall calcification appear now compared to its sequence history?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier atelectasis sequences: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. What type of lesion is atelectasis now, given its temporal sequence?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"In past, lung nodule was: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes lung nodule?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"Prior pericardial effusion timeline: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of pericardial effusion?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"pulmonary fibrotic sequela over time: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for pulmonary fibrotic sequela considering its sequence history?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed emphysema as: [0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What is the current CT assessment of emphysema based on prior sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for pleural effusion: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of pleural effusion?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"Previous cardiomegaly states: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of cardiomegaly?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"arterial wall calcification condition history: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has arterial wall calcification changed from past sequences to the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"Before now, lymphadenopathy showed [1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. What lesion category applies to lymphadenopathy in the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for hiatal hernia: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. How does hiatal hernia appear now compared to its sequence history?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_500_d_1.nii.gz,"mosaic attenuation pattern trend was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. What lesion category applies to mosaic attenuation pattern in the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"consolidation progression: [0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How has consolidation progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"Prior atelectasis timeline: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of atelectasis?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"Before now, cardiomegaly showed [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for cardiomegaly considering its sequence history?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed pericardial effusion as: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. What does pericardial effusion currently represent, based on past sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"lymphadenopathy over time: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How has lymphadenopathy progressed according to its temporal sequence?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"emphysema progression: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. How has emphysema evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"Before now, lung nodule showed [0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. What does lung nodule currently represent, based on past sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"Previous arterial wall calcification states: [0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. What type of lesion is arterial wall calcification now, given its temporal sequence?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for coronary artery wall calcification: [1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for coronary artery wall calcification considering its sequence history?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"pleural effusion trend was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes pleural effusion?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"Historical mosaic attenuation pattern status: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of mosaic attenuation pattern?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"peribronchial thickening sequence was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. What is the current status of peribronchial thickening based on previous sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier CTs showed interlobular septal thickening as: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has interlobular septal thickening changed from past sequences to the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for lung opacity: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the current CT show about lung opacity based on earlier sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"bronchiectasis had: [0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. How is bronchiectasis classified now using past sequence data?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"pulmonary fibrotic sequela over time: [0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is pulmonary fibrotic sequela in the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_787_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier hiatal hernia sequences: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is hiatal hernia in the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"In past, coronary artery wall calcification was: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. How is coronary artery wall calcification classified now using past sequence data?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"interlobular septal thickening condition history: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. How does interlobular septal thickening appear now compared to its sequence history?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"bronchiectasis over time: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What is the current CT assessment of bronchiectasis based on prior sequences?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier CTs showed arterial wall calcification as: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. What is the current status of arterial wall calcification based on previous sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier CTs showed cardiomegaly as: [0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What is the current CT assessment of cardiomegaly based on prior sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for hiatal hernia: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has hiatal hernia changed from past sequences to the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for lymphadenopathy: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for lymphadenopathy considering its sequence history?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for pleural effusion: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. How has pleural effusion evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of atelectasis: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. What does atelectasis currently represent, based on past sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"lung opacity condition history: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. Given its sequence history, what is lung opacity in the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of mosaic attenuation pattern?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"Earlier peribronchial thickening sequences: [0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. What lesion category applies to peribronchial thickening in the current CT?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"consolidation had: [1, 1, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has consolidation changed from past sequences to the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"Historical emphysema status: [1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. What is the current status of emphysema based on previous sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"Previous pulmonary fibrotic sequela states: [1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How has pulmonary fibrotic sequela progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"In past, pericardial effusion was: [1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. What type of lesion is pericardial effusion now, given its temporal sequence?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,3,test_968_d_1.nii.gz,"lung nodule sequence was: [0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. How is lung nodule classified now using past sequence data?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)