| Task,Subtask,VolumeName,Question,Answer,QuestionType,AnswerChoice,Choice A,Choice B,Choice C,Choice D | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for arterial wall calcification: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How has arterial wall calcification progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for consolidation: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of consolidation?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"peribronchial thickening progression: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has peribronchial thickening changed from past sequences to the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"mosaic attenuation pattern over time: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. How is mosaic attenuation pattern classified now using past sequence data?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"Previous pleural effusion states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes pleural effusion?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"Previous pulmonary fibrotic sequela states: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the current CT show about pulmonary fibrotic sequela based on earlier sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"Earlier CTs showed lung opacity as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. What type of lesion is lung opacity now, given its temporal sequence?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"Prior bronchiectasis timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of bronchiectasis?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"lung nodule condition history: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of lung nodule?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of emphysema: [1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of emphysema?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"Earlier lymphadenopathy sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. What is the current status of lymphadenopathy based on previous sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of hiatal hernia: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. How has hiatal hernia evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed coronary artery wall calcification as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of coronary artery wall calcification?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"pericardial effusion had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What is the current CT assessment of pericardial effusion based on prior sequences?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"Before now, cardiomegaly showed [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes cardiomegaly?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"atelectasis condition history: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the current CT show about atelectasis based on earlier sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,6,test_277_g_1.nii.gz,"In past, interlobular septal thickening was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for interlobular septal thickening considering its sequence history?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |