| Task,Subtask,VolumeName,Question,Answer,QuestionType,AnswerChoice,Choice A,Choice B,Choice C,Choice D | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"Before now, arterial wall calcification showed [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has arterial wall calcification progressed according to its temporal sequence?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"In past, cardiomegaly was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about cardiomegaly based on earlier sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"pericardial effusion sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has pericardial effusion evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"coronary artery wall calcification sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is coronary artery wall calcification now, given its temporal sequence?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for hiatal hernia: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is hiatal hernia in the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for lymphadenopathy: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has lymphadenopathy progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"In past, emphysema was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of emphysema?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"atelectasis sequence was: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has atelectasis changed from past sequences to the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for lung nodule: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of lung nodule based on previous sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"lung opacity condition history: [0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of lung opacity based on prior sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"Prior pulmonary fibrotic sequela timeline: [0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does pulmonary fibrotic sequela appear now compared to its sequence history?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"pleural effusion condition history: [1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about pleural effusion based on earlier sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"mosaic attenuation pattern condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes mosaic attenuation pattern?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"Prior peribronchial thickening timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is peribronchial thickening now, given its temporal sequence?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"consolidation had: [0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does consolidation currently represent, based on past sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for bronchiectasis: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is bronchiectasis classified now using past sequence data?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,11,train_10744_o_1.nii.gz,"Prior interlobular septal thickening timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for interlobular septal thickening considering its sequence history?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |