| Task,Subtask,VolumeName,Question,Answer,QuestionType,AnswerChoice,Choice A,Choice B,Choice C,Choice D | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"arterial wall calcification condition history: [1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of arterial wall calcification based on prior sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"Prior cardiomegaly timeline: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does cardiomegaly appear now compared to its sequence history?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"Earlier pericardial effusion sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does pericardial effusion appear now compared to its sequence history?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"coronary artery wall calcification had: [1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does coronary artery wall calcification currently represent, based on past sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for hiatal hernia: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is hiatal hernia classified now using past sequence data?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"lymphadenopathy over time: [1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of lymphadenopathy?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"Earlier CTs showed emphysema as: [0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of emphysema?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"atelectasis progression: [1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has atelectasis changed from past sequences to the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed lung nodule as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of lung nodule based on previous sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of lung opacity: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about lung opacity based on earlier sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"Historical pulmonary fibrotic sequela status: [0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has pulmonary fibrotic sequela changed from past sequences to the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"Earlier pleural effusion sequences: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is pleural effusion now, given its temporal sequence?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"Previous mosaic attenuation pattern states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does mosaic attenuation pattern currently represent, based on past sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"Previous peribronchial thickening states: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is peribronchial thickening in the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for consolidation: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes consolidation?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for bronchiectasis: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is bronchiectasis classified now using past sequence data?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |
| 6,12,train_3112_q_1.nii.gz,"interlobular septal thickening trend was: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for interlobular septal thickening considering its sequence history?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent) | |