Task,Subtask,VolumeName,Question,Answer,QuestionType,AnswerChoice,Choice A,Choice B,Choice C,Choice D
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"arterial wall calcification condition history: [1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. How is arterial wall calcification classified now using past sequence data?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for bronchiectasis: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. What does the CT show for bronchiectasis considering its sequence history?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"Earlier consolidation sequences: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What is the current CT assessment of consolidation based on prior sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"In past, peribronchial thickening was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. What type of lesion is peribronchial thickening now, given its temporal sequence?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"Earlier CTs showed mosaic attenuation pattern as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What is the current CT assessment of mosaic attenuation pattern based on prior sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed pleural effusion as: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. What lesion category applies to pleural effusion in the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"pulmonary fibrotic sequela had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. What lesion category applies to pulmonary fibrotic sequela in the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"Before now, lung opacity showed [1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. How does lung opacity appear now compared to its sequence history?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"Before now, interlobular septal thickening showed [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of interlobular septal thickening?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"Previous atelectasis states: [1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. How is atelectasis classified now using past sequence data?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"emphysema condition history: [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. What is the current status of emphysema based on previous sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"Historical lymphadenopathy status: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. What type of lesion is lymphadenopathy now, given its temporal sequence?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of hiatal hernia: [1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of hiatal hernia?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for coronary artery wall calcification: [1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of coronary artery wall calcification?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"pericardial effusion sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. How does pericardial effusion appear now compared to its sequence history?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"Previous cardiomegaly states: [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has cardiomegaly changed from past sequences to the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_482_h_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for lung nodule: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has lung nodule changed from past sequences to the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for pulmonary fibrotic sequela: [1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes pulmonary fibrotic sequela?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"In past, atelectasis was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. What is the current status of atelectasis based on previous sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"Historical consolidation status: [0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of consolidation?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"peribronchial thickening trend was: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has peribronchial thickening changed from past sequences to the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. How has mosaic attenuation pattern changed from past sequences to the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for lung opacity: [1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. How is lung opacity classified now using past sequence data?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"Prior lung nodule timeline: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the current CT show about lung nodule based on earlier sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"pericardial effusion had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. From sequence history to now, what best describes pericardial effusion?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"emphysema progression: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of emphysema?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"Prior lymphadenopathy timeline: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. What is the current status of lymphadenopathy based on previous sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"cardiomegaly sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the current CT show about cardiomegaly based on earlier sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"Earlier arterial wall calcification sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How has arterial wall calcification progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"bronchiectasis sequence was: [1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. How does bronchiectasis appear now compared to its sequence history?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"Earlier CTs showed hiatal hernia as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of hiatal hernia?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"coronary artery wall calcification over time: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. How has coronary artery wall calcification evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for pleural effusion: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. How is pleural effusion classified now using past sequence data?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,7,test_937_h_1.nii.gz,"Before now, interlobular septal thickening showed [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of interlobular septal thickening?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)