Task,Subtask,VolumeName,Question,Answer,QuestionType,AnswerChoice,Choice A,Choice B,Choice C,Choice D
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for interlobular septal thickening: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is interlobular septal thickening now, given its temporal sequence?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"coronary artery wall calcification sequence was: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of coronary artery wall calcification?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"In past, arterial wall calcification was: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to arterial wall calcification in the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"atelectasis had: [1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of atelectasis based on prior sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"cardiomegaly condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has cardiomegaly changed from past sequences to the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for hiatal hernia: [1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of hiatal hernia?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"lymphadenopathy condition history: [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has lymphadenopathy evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"Prior emphysema timeline: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has emphysema progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"Prior pericardial effusion timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of pericardial effusion based on previous sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"bronchiectasis had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about bronchiectasis based on earlier sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of lung opacity: [1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is lung opacity classified now using past sequence data?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"Earlier pulmonary fibrotic sequela sequences: [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of pulmonary fibrotic sequela?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"mosaic attenuation pattern progression: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is mosaic attenuation pattern classified now using past sequence data?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed peribronchial thickening as: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of peribronchial thickening?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"Previous consolidation states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has consolidation changed from past sequences to the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for lung nodule: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does lung nodule appear now compared to its sequence history?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16148_j_1.nii.gz,"pleural effusion over time: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does pleural effusion currently represent, based on past sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed pulmonary fibrotic sequela as: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has pulmonary fibrotic sequela evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"lung opacity progression: [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of lung opacity?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"In past, arterial wall calcification was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has arterial wall calcification changed from past sequences to the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"consolidation over time: [0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has consolidation evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for peribronchial thickening: [0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of peribronchial thickening?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"mosaic attenuation pattern condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is mosaic attenuation pattern now, given its temporal sequence?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of pleural effusion: [1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has pleural effusion progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"Prior atelectasis timeline: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to atelectasis in the current CT?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"lung nodule had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of lung nodule?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"Sequence history for lymphadenopathy: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to lymphadenopathy in the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"hiatal hernia had: [1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for hiatal hernia considering its sequence history?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for coronary artery wall calcification: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about coronary artery wall calcification based on earlier sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"pericardial effusion condition history: [1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for pericardial effusion considering its sequence history?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"cardiomegaly sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of cardiomegaly based on previous sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"Earlier interlobular septal thickening sequences: [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of interlobular septal thickening based on prior sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"emphysema over time: [1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of emphysema?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_16924_j_1.nii.gz,"bronchiectasis progression: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has bronchiectasis progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"Earlier CTs showed atelectasis as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is atelectasis now, given its temporal sequence?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for interlobular septal thickening: [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of interlobular septal thickening?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"consolidation sequence was: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to consolidation in the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"In past, peribronchial thickening was: [1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for peribronchial thickening considering its sequence history?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"Historical pulmonary fibrotic sequela status: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about pulmonary fibrotic sequela based on earlier sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"Before now, lung opacity showed [1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes lung opacity?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"Historical lung nodule status: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is lung nodule in the current CT?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"pericardial effusion condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for pericardial effusion considering its sequence history?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"Before now, mosaic attenuation pattern showed [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is mosaic attenuation pattern now, given its temporal sequence?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"lymphadenopathy trend was: [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about lymphadenopathy based on earlier sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for hiatal hernia: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of hiatal hernia based on previous sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"Earlier CTs showed coronary artery wall calcification as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of coronary artery wall calcification based on previous sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for cardiomegaly: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes cardiomegaly?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"In past, bronchiectasis was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is bronchiectasis in the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"arterial wall calcification trend was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has arterial wall calcification changed from past sequences to the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed emphysema as: [1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of emphysema?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_8244_j_1.nii.gz,"Prior pleural effusion timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to pleural effusion in the current CT?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"emphysema over time: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has emphysema evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"Old sequences for peribronchial thickening: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of peribronchial thickening based on prior sequences?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"Previous mosaic attenuation pattern states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has mosaic attenuation pattern progressed according to its temporal sequence?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of pleural effusion: [1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does pleural effusion appear now compared to its sequence history?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of pulmonary fibrotic sequela: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has pulmonary fibrotic sequela progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed lung nodule as: [1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of lung nodule based on prior sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"atelectasis progression: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has atelectasis progressed according to its temporal sequence?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"Recorded sequences for pericardial effusion: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does pericardial effusion appear now compared to its sequence history?","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",Close,C,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"lymphadenopathy progression: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of lymphadenopathy?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"Earlier hiatal hernia sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has hiatal hernia evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed cardiomegaly as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of cardiomegaly?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"arterial wall calcification progression: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to arterial wall calcification in the current CT?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"Earlier consolidation sequences: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does consolidation currently represent, based on past sequences?","Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)",Close,A,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"bronchiectasis trend was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does bronchiectasis appear now compared to its sequence history?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"Past sequences of coronary artery wall calcification: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of coronary artery wall calcification?",No Abnormality (Always absent),Close,D,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"Scans showed lung opacity as: [0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has lung opacity evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)
6,8,train_9113_j_1.nii.gz,"Earlier interlobular septal thickening sequences: [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of interlobular septal thickening based on prior sequences?","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)",Close,B,"Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)","Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)","New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)",No Abnormality (Always absent)