Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,107 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
license: mit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
license: mit
|
| 3 |
+
language:
|
| 4 |
+
- en
|
| 5 |
---
|
| 6 |
+
# HeatBee: Surrogate Modeling of High-Mass Vernacular Architecture in Arid Climates
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
[](https://energyplus.net/)
|
| 9 |
+
[](https://www.python.org/)
|
| 10 |
+
[](https://xgboost.readthedocs.io/)
|
| 11 |
+
[](LICENSE)
|
| 12 |
+
[]((https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23145635))
|
| 13 |
+
|
| 14 |
+
HeatBee is an open-source building performance simulation pipeline and Machine Learning surrogate model investigating the transient thermodynamic behavior of vernacular rammed earth (*pisé*) architecture versus contemporary construction in **Marrakesh, Morocco (Zone Climatique 5)**.
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
---
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
## 🎯 Key Physical Findings
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
Simulations were performed under the peak summer period of the Marrakesh Menara Airport EPW (peak outdoor dry-bulb: **45.52°C**).
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
### 1. The Typology Comparison: Interior Mass vs. Envelope Insulation
|
| 23 |
+
* **As-Built Typology (Mode A):** A 50 cm pisé room (with earth partitions and floor) maintains a peak operative temperature of **30.63°C** and **20.3 Discomfort Degree Hours (>30°C)**, compared to **31.48°C** and **81.1 DDH** for an RTCM Zone 5 modern room (20 cm hollow brick with 4 cm XPS insulation and 15 cm concrete slabs).
|
| 24 |
+
* **Shared Interior Mass (Mode B):** When both rooms are modeled with identical 15 cm concrete slab floors and partitions, the result equalizes: the RTCM-insulated room reaches **31.48°C** (81.1 DDH), while the pisé room reaches **31.76°C** (165.8 DDH).
|
| 25 |
+
* **Takeaway:** The vernacular advantage is driven primarily by **interior volumetric thermal mass** coupled with nocturnal free cooling, rather than the exterior earth wall possessing superior steady-state thermal resistance over continuous code insulation.
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
### 2. Component Apportionment (Wall vs. Roof)
|
| 28 |
+
Holding interior mass constant (15 cm concrete partitions for all), component swapping reveals:
|
| 29 |
+
* **The 50 cm pisé exterior wall outperforms the RTCM insulated wall by 0.16°C** (31.32°C vs 31.48°C peak), as extreme thermal inertia suppresses peak daytime flux.
|
| 30 |
+
* **The traditional mud/timber roof is the primary thermal vulnerability**, admitting **+0.50°C** of excess heat compared to the RTCM-insulated roof (31.98°C vs 31.48°C).
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
### 3. Realistic Ground-Coupled Boundary
|
| 33 |
+
* Under an adiabatic floor assumption (isolated upper-floor room), the pisé room peaks at **30.63°C**.
|
| 34 |
+
* Under realistic summer ground coupling (Kusuda $24.0^\circ\text{C}$–$25.0^\circ\text{C}$ subsoil), downward heat dissipation drops the pisé room peak to **29.61°C**, bringing it completely below the 30.0°C adaptive comfort limit during a 45.5°C heatwave.
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
### 4. Thermal Mass and Ventilation Sweeps
|
| 37 |
+
* **Mass Diminishing Returns:** Increasing pisé thickness from 15 cm to 45 cm reduces peak temperatures by **2.40°C**, whereas adding another 30 cm (to 75 cm) yields only **0.71°C** of marginal cooling. This aligns with the 1D periodic thermal penetration depth:
|
| 38 |
+
$$\delta = \sqrt{\frac{k}{\rho c_p} \frac{P}{\pi}} \approx 11\text{ cm}$$
|
| 39 |
+
Beyond $4\delta \approx 44\text{ cm}$, the diurnal thermal wave is attenuated by ~98%.
|
| 40 |
+
* **Nocturnal Ventilation:** Increasing airflow from 0 to 4 ACH drops peak temperatures by **1.46°C**, but tripling airflow from 4 to 12 ACH yields only **0.51°C** of additional relief as indoor air approaches ambient night temperature.
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
---
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
## 🔬 Benchmark Comparison (July–August Peak Heatwave)
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
*Shared boundary conditions: Roof albedo 0.60, external wall solar absorptance 0.50, glazing SHGC 0.40, 4.0 ACH free cooling, adiabatic perimeter.*
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
| Archetype | Peak Temp [°C] | Mean Temp [°C] | DDH (>30°C) | Decrement ($f$) |
|
| 49 |
+
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
|
| 50 |
+
| **Ambient Outdoor (Menara EPW)** | **45.52** | 29.67 | 3642.2 | 1.00 |
|
| 51 |
+
| **Modern Uninsulated (20cm Hollow Brick, Brick Floor)** | **35.21** | 28.68 | 740.1 | 0.34 |
|
| 52 |
+
| **Modern RTCM Zone 5 (4cm XPS, 15cm Concrete Slab)** | **31.48** | **28.14** | 81.1 | **0.12** |
|
| 53 |
+
| **Vernacular Medina Riad (50cm Pisé, Pisé Floor)** | **30.63** | 28.24 | **20.3** | 0.14 |
|
| 54 |
+
| *Riad with Concrete Slab Floor (Mode B)* | *31.76* | *28.45* | *165.8* | *0.13* |
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
---
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
## ⚡ Machine Learning Surrogate Fidelity
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
* **Model:** Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (`XGBoostRegressor`)
|
| 61 |
+
* **Training Dataset:** 256 Latin Hypercube samples evaluated via EnergyPlus 26.2 `ConductionFiniteDifference`
|
| 62 |
+
* **5-Fold Cross Validation:** $R^2 = 0.9450$ | $\text{RMSE} = 0.358^\circ\text{C}$ | $\text{MAE} = 0.275^\circ\text{C}$ (Spread $\sigma = 1.53^\circ\text{C}$)
|
| 63 |
+
* **Out-of-Sample Holdout (N=32 Unseen Runs, Seed 999):** $\text{RMSE} = 0.316^\circ\text{C}$ | $\text{MAE} = 0.262^\circ\text{C}$
|
| 64 |
+
* **Inference Latency:** $< 1\text{ ms}$ on CPU
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
---
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
## ⚠️ Limitations
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
1. **Single-Zone Idealization:** The model represents an isolated single-room perimeter zone facing an exterior aperture, not a fully coupled 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) courtyard void.
|
| 71 |
+
2. **Simplified Infiltration & Internal Loads:** Constant occupancy sensible gains (2 people, 240 W) without dynamic appliance scheduling or variable occupant window operation.
|
| 72 |
+
3. **No Sensor Calibration:** This is a numerical comparative simulation; boundary conditions have not yet been calibrated against empirical data-logger measurements from historic medina structures.
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
---
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
## 🚀 Quickstart
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
```bash
|
| 79 |
+
# 1. Clone repository
|
| 80 |
+
git clone https://github.com/<your-username>/HeatBee.git
|
| 81 |
+
cd HeatBee
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
# 2. Install dependencies
|
| 84 |
+
pip install -r requirements.txt
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
# 3. Run verified benchmark, sweeps, and holdout validation
|
| 87 |
+
python cli.py --benchmark
|
| 88 |
+
python cli.py --sweeps
|
| 89 |
+
python cli.py --holdout
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
# 4. Launch interactive dashboard
|
| 92 |
+
streamlit run app.py
|
| 93 |
+
```
|
| 94 |
+
|
| 95 |
+
---
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
## 📄 Citation & License
|
| 98 |
+
MIT License. If citing this software or dataset:
|
| 99 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 100 |
+
@software{heatbee2026,
|
| 101 |
+
author = {Haytam Aarab},
|
| 102 |
+
title = {HeatBee: Surrogate Modeling of High-Mass Vernacular Architecture in Arid Climates},
|
| 103 |
+
year = {2026},
|
| 104 |
+
publisher = {Zenodo},
|
| 105 |
+
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23145635}
|
| 106 |
+
}
|
| 107 |
+
```
|