Fill 418,271 rescored secondary-metric values
Browse filesinterface_lddt, the CDR RMSDs and epitope_jaccard were empty on the cells labelled by a host whose environment lacked PyYAML and ANARCI. They are recomputed by the same scorers from the same structures and filled in: 418,271 cells go from null to a value in boltz2, esmfold2 and protenix-v2. No populated value changed and no populated value became null. opendde-abag was already complete and is unchanged. epitope_jaccard stays null on the seven targets with no resolvable native antigen chain, so the 2026-08-14 false-zero correction stands.
- README.md +62 -14
- samples/boltz2.parquet +2 -2
- samples/esmfold2.parquet +2 -2
- samples/protenix-v2.parquet +2 -2
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -67,6 +67,14 @@ its pLDDT selector is quantised to 4 decimals, which leaves about 181 distinct v
|
|
| 67 |
a top-selector tie on 20 of the 161 scorable targets. Break those ties the other way and
|
| 68 |
esmfold2's delivered@512 reads 0.2878 rather than 0.2852.
|
| 69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 70 |
## The benchmark this builds on
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
The 164 targets are **2026ARK-AB**, the antibody-antigen benchmark released with OpenDDE: 164 PDB
|
|
@@ -135,9 +143,9 @@ per distinct chain sequence).
|
|
| 135 |
| `irmsd` | float32 | Å | interface backbone RMSD |
|
| 136 |
| `lrmsd` | float32 | Å | ligand RMSD |
|
| 137 |
| `fnat` | float32 | [0,1] | fraction of native contacts recovered |
|
| 138 |
-
| `interface_lddt` | float32 | [0,1] | lDDT over interface atom pairs.
|
| 139 |
-
| `cdr_h1_rmsd`, `cdr_h2_rmsd`, `cdr_h3_rmsd` | float32 | Å | per-CDR-loop RMSD after alignment.
|
| 140 |
-
| `epitope_jaccard` | float32 | [0,1] | overlap of predicted and native antigen contact residue sets.
|
| 141 |
| `seed` | int32 | | diffusion seed for the chunk |
|
| 142 |
| `mps` | int8 | chips | chips per fold job. Null where the fleet recorded `auto` |
|
| 143 |
| `wall_s` | int32 | s | wall time of the 64-sample chunk, not of one sample. All 64 rows of a chunk share it |
|
|
@@ -194,22 +202,54 @@ leaving the value empty. Those rows read as "the model missed the epitope entire
|
|
| 194 |
"not computable". They cover 7 targets (9kwy, 9ly2, 9ly3, 9lz2, 9ull, 9ulm, 9ynx) in all four models.
|
| 195 |
|
| 196 |
Rows were selected on the scorer's own `native_epitope_size == 0`, never on the value being zero.
|
| 197 |
-
**The
|
| 198 |
-
other value in
|
| 199 |
-
else did.
|
|
|
|
| 200 |
|
| 201 |
The dataset was public with the old values from about 10:41 UTC on 2026-08-14 until this commit. To
|
| 202 |
tell which copy you hold, read `epitope_jaccard` on target 9kwy: null is the corrected data, 0.0 is
|
| 203 |
the old data. Either re-pull, or drop `epitope_jaccard` on those seven targets.
|
| 204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 205 |
## Known limitations
|
| 206 |
|
| 207 |
* **164 targets.** Enough to separate the four models' oracle-delivered gaps with intervals that do
|
| 208 |
not overlap zero. Not enough to support per-epitope-class or per-germline claims, and not a
|
| 209 |
general statement about co-folding beyond antibody-antigen complexes.
|
| 210 |
-
* **Three targets carry no DockQ.** 9ly2, 9ly3 and 9lz2 are
|
| 211 |
-
|
| 212 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 213 |
* **`epitope_jaccard` is null on seven targets.** 9kwy, 9ly2, 9ly3, 9lz2, 9ull, 9ulm and 9ynx have
|
| 214 |
no resolvable native antigen chain, so there is no native epitope set to compare a prediction
|
| 215 |
against and no overlap exists to measure, in any model. Read those nulls as "not computable", not
|
|
@@ -220,11 +260,19 @@ the old data. Either re-pull, or drop `epitope_jaccard` on those seven targets.
|
|
| 220 |
scorer, and a scan over the whole panel found it the only such case. It is a pipeline artifact,
|
| 221 |
not model behaviour, and no published number used it. That is why `samples` has 655 x 512 rows,
|
| 222 |
not 656 x 512.
|
| 223 |
-
* **The secondary metrics are
|
| 224 |
-
every scorable sample in all four models.
|
| 225 |
-
|
| 226 |
-
|
| 227 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 228 |
* **512 is a decision cap, not a measured knee.** The oracle's gain per doubling is still positive at
|
| 229 |
the top rung, so the ceiling has not saturated. Nothing here says 512 is where sampling stops
|
| 230 |
paying.
|
|
|
|
| 67 |
a top-selector tie on 20 of the 161 scorable targets. Break those ties the other way and
|
| 68 |
esmfold2's delivered@512 reads 0.2878 rather than 0.2852.
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
+
## Computed on Tenstorrent
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
All 335,360 folds ran on **[Tenstorrent](https://tenstorrent.com)** hardware, a 32-chip Wormhole Galaxy, using
|
| 73 |
+
**[TT-Bio](https://github.com/moritztng/tt-bio)**, our open-source stack for running structure
|
| 74 |
+
prediction models on Tenstorrent. Four models, 512 samples per target, 164 targets. At this scale
|
| 75 |
+
cost per prediction is what decides whether a study like this is affordable at all, which is most of
|
| 76 |
+
why this dataset exists.
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
## The benchmark this builds on
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
The 164 targets are **2026ARK-AB**, the antibody-antigen benchmark released with OpenDDE: 164 PDB
|
|
|
|
| 143 |
| `irmsd` | float32 | Å | interface backbone RMSD |
|
| 144 |
| `lrmsd` | float32 | Å | ligand RMSD |
|
| 145 |
| `fnat` | float32 | [0,1] | fraction of native contacts recovered |
|
| 146 |
+
| `interface_lddt` | float32 | [0,1] | lDDT over interface atom pairs. Null on 4 targets and a few scattered poses, see limitations |
|
| 147 |
+
| `cdr_h1_rmsd`, `cdr_h2_rmsd`, `cdr_h3_rmsd` | float32 | Å | per-CDR-loop RMSD after alignment. Null on 4 targets for H1, 5 for H2 and H3, see limitations |
|
| 148 |
+
| `epitope_jaccard` | float32 | [0,1] | overlap of predicted and native antigen contact residue sets. Null on the 7 targets with no resolvable native epitope, see limitations |
|
| 149 |
| `seed` | int32 | | diffusion seed for the chunk |
|
| 150 |
| `mps` | int8 | chips | chips per fold job. Null where the fleet recorded `auto` |
|
| 151 |
| `wall_s` | int32 | s | wall time of the 64-sample chunk, not of one sample. All 64 rows of a chunk share it |
|
|
|
|
| 202 |
"not computable". They cover 7 targets (9kwy, 9ly2, 9ly3, 9lz2, 9ull, 9ulm, 9ynx) in all four models.
|
| 203 |
|
| 204 |
Rows were selected on the scorer's own `native_epitope_size == 0`, never on the value being zero.
|
| 205 |
+
**The exact zeros on other targets are real measurements** and none of them changed, nor did any
|
| 206 |
+
other value in any other column: 11,776 cells moved across the whole `samples` config and nothing
|
| 207 |
+
else did. There were 44,433 of those real zeros at this commit. The rescore below then filled rows
|
| 208 |
+
that had been empty, some of them with real zeros, and the count is now 52,440.
|
| 209 |
|
| 210 |
The dataset was public with the old values from about 10:41 UTC on 2026-08-14 until this commit. To
|
| 211 |
tell which copy you hold, read `epitope_jaccard` on target 9kwy: null is the corrected data, 0.0 is
|
| 212 |
the old data. Either re-pull, or drop `epitope_jaccard` on those seven targets.
|
| 213 |
|
| 214 |
+
## Rescored secondary metrics, 2026-08-14
|
| 215 |
+
|
| 216 |
+
**418,271 `interface_lddt`, CDR-RMSD and `epitope_jaccard` values changed from null to a value.**
|
| 217 |
+
Nothing else moved. The gaps were never a property of the folds. The labelling ran across two hosts
|
| 218 |
+
and one of them had no PyYAML and no ANARCI, so every metric that needs them came back empty on the
|
| 219 |
+
cells that host scored, which is why the missing values fell on whole 64-sample jobs rather than on
|
| 220 |
+
individual poses. All 111,616 affected predictions were still on disk, so the repair was to rescore
|
| 221 |
+
them with the same scripts, the same interpreter and the same structures that produced every value
|
| 222 |
+
already in this dataset.
|
| 223 |
+
|
| 224 |
+
That makes it a fill, and it is asserted as one. Re-running those scorers on 22,368 already-populated
|
| 225 |
+
values reproduced all 22,368 bit-for-bit, and the upload moved nothing: `value_changed` is 0 and
|
| 226 |
+
`value -> null` is 0 on every column of every file. The fills are 41,472 in boltz2, 249,301 in
|
| 227 |
+
esmfold2 and 127,498 in protenix-v2. opendde-abag was already complete and its file is unchanged.
|
| 228 |
+
|
| 229 |
+
`epitope_jaccard` stays null on the seven targets named above. The rescore does compute it there, as
|
| 230 |
+
`0.0`, which is exactly the artifact the correction above removed, so those 14,336 rows are left
|
| 231 |
+
empty on purpose.
|
| 232 |
+
|
| 233 |
+
**The stated reason for the three unscorable targets was also wrong, and is corrected.** This card
|
| 234 |
+
said 9ly2, 9ly3 and 9lz2 are 3-way Ab:Ag hetero-hexamers whose antibody-antigen interface the scorer
|
| 235 |
+
cannot resolve. The chain map is in fact correct and explicitly declared. The real mechanism is
|
| 236 |
+
chemical: 71/71, 78/78 and 48/48 of the antigen-side contact atoms on their declared interface sit on
|
| 237 |
+
phosphoserine, which DockQ drops. No value changed with that correction, only the explanation.
|
| 238 |
+
|
| 239 |
+
Earlier pulls carry the old, ragged columns. To tell which copy you hold, count non-null
|
| 240 |
+
`cdr_h3_rmsd` in `samples/esmfold2.parquet`: 81,408 in this data, 15,360 in the old.
|
| 241 |
+
|
| 242 |
## Known limitations
|
| 243 |
|
| 244 |
* **164 targets.** Enough to separate the four models' oracle-delivered gaps with intervals that do
|
| 245 |
not overlap zero. Not enough to support per-epitope-class or per-germline claims, and not a
|
| 246 |
general statement about co-folding beyond antibody-antigen complexes.
|
| 247 |
+
* **Three targets carry no DockQ.** 9ly2, 9ly3 and 9lz2 are anti-phosphoepitope antibodies. Every
|
| 248 |
+
contact atom on the antigen side of their declared interface sits on a phosphoserine (71/71, 78/78
|
| 249 |
+
and 48/48), and DockQ scores only standard residues, so the interface has nothing to score. The
|
| 250 |
+
fold input carries unmodified serine at those positions, so the quantity does not exist on the
|
| 251 |
+
prediction side either. Their confidence values ship; `dockq` is null. 161 targets are scorable, in
|
| 252 |
+
every model.
|
| 253 |
* **`epitope_jaccard` is null on seven targets.** 9kwy, 9ly2, 9ly3, 9lz2, 9ull, 9ulm and 9ynx have
|
| 254 |
no resolvable native antigen chain, so there is no native epitope set to compare a prediction
|
| 255 |
against and no overlap exists to measure, in any model. Read those nulls as "not computable", not
|
|
|
|
| 260 |
scorer, and a scan over the whole panel found it the only such case. It is a pipeline artifact,
|
| 261 |
not model behaviour, and no published number used it. That is why `samples` has 655 x 512 rows,
|
| 262 |
not 656 x 512.
|
| 263 |
+
* **The secondary metrics are near-complete, and null where the quantity does not exist.** `dockq`,
|
| 264 |
+
`irmsd`, `lrmsd` and `fnat` are populated on every scorable sample in all four models. Mean
|
| 265 |
+
per-target depth out of 512, for boltz2 / esmfold2 / opendde-abag / protenix-v2: `interface_lddt`
|
| 266 |
+
499.4 / 498.9 / 499.4 / 499.4, `cdr_h1_rmsd` 496.8 / 496.8 / 496.8 / 496.8, `cdr_h2_rmsd` and
|
| 267 |
+
`cdr_h3_rmsd` 496.4 / 496.4 / 496.3 / 496.4, `epitope_jaccard` 490.1 / 490.1 / 490.0 / 490.1. The
|
| 268 |
+
shortfall is named targets, the same ones in every model. `interface_lddt` is null on 9ly2, 9ly3,
|
| 269 |
+
9lz2 and 9mz8, whose native antigen chain does not resolve. The CDR RMSDs are null on 9l9y, 9mnu,
|
| 270 |
+
9msc and 9udq, whose native heavy chain cannot be IMGT-numbered, and H2 and H3 additionally on
|
| 271 |
+
9lwc. `epitope_jaccard` is null on the seven targets above. Beyond those, a thin per-pose residual
|
| 272 |
+
remains, scattered rather than by target: `interface_lddt` on 13 / 108 / 0 / 16 samples and
|
| 273 |
+
`cdr_h1_rmsd` on 439 / 450 / 434 / 449. `cdr_h2_rmsd`, `cdr_h3_rmsd` and `epitope_jaccard` have
|
| 274 |
+
none. Quote these metrics at their own depth, and read the nulls on the named targets as "not
|
| 275 |
+
computable" rather than as misses.
|
| 276 |
* **512 is a decision cap, not a measured knee.** The oracle's gain per doubling is still positive at
|
| 277 |
the top rung, so the ceiling has not saturated. Nothing here says 512 is where sampling stops
|
| 278 |
paying.
|
samples/boltz2.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:105cf64ee791fd16e7d9b59d01480fceda9841d9ca358fc8b69f3ccc14eb8c71
|
| 3 |
+
size 5254680
|
samples/esmfold2.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:684252e8cdfa4119ef5e6ab7814f6a4f973789eda0a7d1504aab34c833c013a4
|
| 3 |
+
size 3686423
|
samples/protenix-v2.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:a8e48aa50f836c8acc951a41dd0f105ac15997cf674cfd5d5947eb8c15c07832
|
| 3 |
+
size 5319174
|