| Registering a Dispatched Operator in C++ |
| ======================================== |
|
|
| The dispatcher is an internal component of PyTorch which is responsible for |
| figuring out what code should actually get run when you call a function like |
| ``torch::add``. This can be nontrivial, because PyTorch operations need |
| to handle a lot of cross-cutting concerns that are "layered" on top of one |
| of another. Here is a sampling of some of the things it handles: |
|
|
| * Switching between the CPU and CUDA implementations of an operator, depending |
| on the devices of the input tensors. |
| * Switching between the autograd and backend implementations of an operator, |
| depending on whether or not autograd handling is necessary. |
| * Applying autocasting when necessary for automatic mixed precision. |
| * Applying batching rules when an operator is run under a ``vmap`` call. |
| * Tracing execution of operations, if you are tracing a model for export. |
|
|
| If in your `custom operator code <torch_script_custom_ops>`_ you find yourself |
| manually writing if statements to handle these cases, the dispatcher APIs can |
| help organize your code. (Conversely, if your custom operator is very simple |
| and is only for CPU inference, you probably don |
| just use the basic API.) |
|
|
| In this tutorial, we will describe how to structure a custom operator |
| registration to use the dispatcher to organize various components. We |
| assume that you are familiar with how to |
| `register an operator <torch_script_custom_ops>`_ and how to write |
| a `custom autograd function <cpp_autograd>`_. |
|
|
| Defining schema and backend implementations |
| ------------------------------------------- |
|
|
| The general principle behind the dispatcher is that it divides the |
| implementation of an operator into multiple kernels, each of which implements |
| functionality for a specific *dispatch key*; for example, CPU, CUDA or Autograd. |
| The dispatcher determines what the highest priority dispatch key is at the time |
| you call an operator (this is done by looking at both the tensor arguments as |
| well as some thread local state), and transfers control to the kernel for that |
| dispatch key. The end effect is that when you call an operator, we first |
| execute the Autograd kernel, and then we redispatch to the CPU or CUDA kernel |
| depending on the device types of the passed in tensors. |
|
|
| Let |
| happen. First, we must define the schema for the operator in question. |
| Unlike simple pybind11-style operator registration, we don |
| provide an implementation of our operator at this point; we just |
| provide a schema string specifying the type signature of the operator |
| that all of our other kernels will abide by: |
|
|
| .. literalinclude:: ../advanced_source/dispatcher/op.cpp |
| :language: cpp |
| :start-after: BEGIN TORCH_LIBRARY |
| :end-before: END TORCH_LIBRARY |
|
|
| Next, we need to actually provide some implementations of this operator. |
| For concreteness, here is a really simple implementation of addition on CPU: |
|
|
| .. literalinclude:: ../advanced_source/dispatcher/op.cpp |
| :language: cpp |
| :start-after: BEGIN myadd_cpu |
| :end-before: END myadd_cpu |
|
|
| We |
| However, the simple way of registering it (``def("myadd", myadd_cpu)``) would |
| register the kernel to run in all cases, even if the tensor is not a CPU |
| tensor! (Internally, we refer to these as "catch-all" kernels, since they |
| catch all cases.) To ensure that ``myadd_cpu`` is only run for |
| CPU tensors, we can use the ``TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL`` macro: |
|
|
| .. literalinclude:: ../advanced_source/dispatcher/op.cpp |
| :language: cpp |
| :start-after: BEGIN TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL CPU |
| :end-before: END TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL CPU |
|
|
| The ``TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL`` lets us register implementations for operators on |
| a specific dispatch key (in this case, CPU). Each call to ``impl`` |
| associates a CPU kernel with the corresponding operator (which we previously |
| defined in the ``TORCH_LIBRARY`` block). If we also have a CUDA implementation ``myadd_cuda``, |
| we can register it in a separate ``TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL`` block: |
|
|
| .. literalinclude:: ../advanced_source/dispatcher/op.cpp |
| :language: cpp |
| :start-after: BEGIN TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL CUDA |
| :end-before: END TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL CUDA |
|
|
| These registrations can be split across files or even across library boundaries; so |
| for example, you could have these two ``TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL`` blocks compiled |
| into a separate ``myops_cpu`` and ``myops_cuda`` dynamic libraries. Generally, |
| speaking, the structure of your registrations will look like this: |
|
|
| 1. A single ``TORCH_LIBRARY`` that lists every custom operator in your namespace |
| in a centralized place. |
| 2. A ``TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL`` per dispatch key that registers implementations for |
| that key (e.g., CPU or CUDA). If you like, you can further subdivide |
| ``TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL`` blocks into a block per operator. This is convenient |
| if you have a separate file per operator implementation, but don |
| expose the operators in a header; you can just put the registration in the |
| cpp file that defines your operator. |
|
|
| .. note:: |
|
|
| Did you know that you can also write ``TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL`` blocks for existing |
| core operators in PyTorch? This is how XLA support for PyTorch is |
| implemented: the ``torch_xla`` library contains a ``TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL`` |
| that provides implementations for all basic operators on the XLA dispatch |
| key. |
|
|
| .. _autograd-support: |
|
|
| Adding autograd support |
| ----------------------- |
|
|
| At this point, we have an operator with both CPU and CUDA implementations. How |
| can we add autograd support to it? As you might guess, we will register an |
| autograd kernel (similar to what |
| However, there is a twist: unlike the CPU and CUDA kernels, the autograd kernel |
| needs to *redispatch*: it needs to call back into the dispatcher to get to |
| the final CPU and CUDA implementations. |
|
|
| Thus, before we write the autograd kernel, let |
| which calls into the dispatcher to find the right kernel for your operator. |
| This function constitutes the public C++ API for your operators--in fact, all of |
| the tensor functions in PyTorch |
| way under the hood. Here |
|
|
| .. literalinclude:: ../advanced_source/dispatcher/op.cpp |
| :language: cpp |
| :start-after: BEGIN myadd |
| :end-before: END myadd |
|
|
| Let |
|
|
| * In the first line, we look up a typed operator handle from the dispatcher |
| corresponding to the operator that we are going to dispatch to. |
| ``findSchemaOrThrow`` takes two arguments: the (namespace qualified) name |
| of the operator, and the overload name of the operator (typically just |
| the empty string). ``typed`` casts the dynamically typed handle into |
| a statically typed handle (doing a runtime test to make sure you |
| the correct C++ type), so that we can do a normal C++ call on it. We |
| pass it ``decltype(myadd)`` since the type of the dispatching function is |
| the same as the type of the underlying kernels registered to the dispatcher. |
|
|
| For performance, this computation is done in a static variable, so that |
| we only need to do the (slow) lookup once. If you typoed the name of the |
| operator you want to call, this lookup will error the first time you call this |
| function. |
|
|
| * In the second line, we simply ``call`` the operator handle with all of the |
| arguments passed into the dispatching function. This will actually invoke |
| the dispatcher and in the end control will be transferred to whatever kernel |
| is appropriate for this call. |
|
|
| With the dispatch function in hand, we can now write the autograd kernel: |
|
|
| .. literalinclude:: ../advanced_source/dispatcher/op.cpp |
| :language: cpp |
| :start-after: BEGIN myadd_autograd |
| :end-before: END myadd_autograd |
|
|
| The autograd function is written as normal using ``torch::autograd::Function``, |
| except that instead of directly writing the implementation in ``forward()``, |
| we: |
|
|
| 1. Turn off autograd handling with the ``at::AutoNonVariableTypeMode`` RAII |
| guard, and then |
| 2. Call the dispatch function ``myadd`` to call back into the dispatcher. |
|
|
| Without (1), your calls will infinite loop (and stack overflow), because |
| ``myadd`` will send you back to this function (as the highest priority dispatch |
| key would still be autograd.) With (1), |
| autograd is excluded from the set of dispatch keys under consideration, and |
| we will go to the next handlers, which will either be CPU and CUDA. |
|
|
| We can now register this function in the same way we registered the CPU/CUDA |
| functions: |
|
|
| .. literalinclude:: ../advanced_source/dispatcher/op.cpp |
| :language: cpp |
| :start-after: BEGIN TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL Autograd |
| :end-before: END TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL Autograd |
|
|
| Going beyond autograd |
| --------------------- |
|
|
| In some sense, the dispatcher isn |
| implement a glorified if-statement, along the lines of this: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: cpp |
|
|
| class MyAddFunction : ... { |
| public: |
| static Tensor forward( |
| AutogradContext *ctx, torch::Tensor self, torch::Tensor other) { |
|
|
| if (self.device().type() == DeviceType::CPU) { |
| return add_cpu(self, other); |
| } else if (self.device().type() == DeviceType::CUDA) { |
| return add_cuda(self, other); |
| } else { |
| TORCH_CHECK(0, "Unsupported device ", self.device().type()); |
| } |
| } |
| ... |
| } |
|
|
| So why use the dispatcher? There are a few reasons: |
|
|
| 1. It is decentralized. You can assemble all of the pieces of an operator |
| (CPU, CUDA, Autograd) without having to write a single, centralized |
| if statement that refers to all of them. Importantly, third parties can |
| register extra implementations for other aspects without having to patch the |
| original definition of an operator. |
|
|
| 2. It supports more dispatch keys than CPU, CUDA and Autograd. You can |
| see a full list of dispatch keys that are currently implemented |
| in PyTorch in ``c10/core/DispatchKey.h``. These dispatch keys |
| implement a variety of optional functionality for operators, and if you |
| decide you want your custom operator to support this functionality, |
| all you have to register a kernel for the appropriate key. |
|
|
| 3. The dispatcher implements support for boxed fallback functions, which |
| are functions that can be implemented once and apply to all operators |
| in the system. Boxed fallbacks can be used to provide default behavior |
| for a dispatch key; if you use the dispatcher to implement your operator, |
| you also opt into the fallbacks for all of these operations. |
|
|
| Here are some particular dispatch keys which you may need to define an operator |
| for. |
|
|
| Autocast |
| ^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
| The Autocast dispatch key implements support for |
| `automatic mixed precision (AMP) <https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/amp.html>`_. |
| An autocast wrapper kernel typically casts incoming ``float16`` or ``float32`` CUDA tensors |
| to some preferred precision before running the op. |
| For example, matmuls and convolutions on floating-point CUDA tensors usually run faster |
| and use less memory in ``float16`` without impairing convergence. |
| Autocast wrappers only have an effect in |
| `autocast-enabled contexts <https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/amp.html#torch.cuda.amp.autocast>`_. |
|
|
| Here |
|
|
| .. code-block:: cpp |
|
|
| // Autocast-specific helper functions |
| #include <ATen/autocast_mode.h> |
|
|
| Tensor mymatmul_autocast(const Tensor& self, const Tensor& other) { |
| c10::impl::ExcludeDispatchKeyGuard no_autocast(c10::DispatchKey::Autocast); |
| return mymatmul(at::autocast::cached_cast(at::kHalf, self), |
| at::autocast::cached_cast(at::kHalf, other)); |
| } |
|
|
| TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL(myops, Autocast, m) { |
| m.impl("mymatmul", mymatmul_autocast); |
| } |
|
|
| ``cached_cast(kHalf, tensor)`` casts ``tensor`` to ``float16`` if ``tensor`` is CUDA and ``float32``, |
| otherwise, it leaves ``tensor`` unchanged (c.f. the |
| `eligibility policy <https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/amp.html#op-eligibility>`_ for natively autocasted ops). |
| This ensures if the network calls ``mymatmul`` on any mixture of ``float16`` and ``float32`` CUDA tensors, |
| ``mymatmul`` runs in ``float16``. Meanwhile, calls to ``mymatmul`` with non-CUDA, integer-type, or ``float64`` |
| inputs are unaffected. Using ``cached_cast`` to follow the native eligibility policy in your own autocast wrapper |
| is recommended, but not required. For example, if you wanted to force ``float16`` execution for all input types, |
| you could ``return mymatmul(self.half(), other.half());`` instead of using ``cached_cast``. |
|
|
| Notice that, like our autograd kernels, we exclude the ``Autocast`` key from |
| dispatch before redispatching. |
|
|
| By default, if no autocast wrapper is provided, |
| we fallthrough directly to the regular operator implementation (no |
| autocasting occurs). (We didn |
| addition doesn |
|
|
| When should an autocast wrapper be registered? Unfortunately, there aren |
| cut-and-dried rules for an op |
| get a sense for some native ops |
| `cast lists <https://pytorch.org/docs/master/amp.html#op-specific-behavior>`_. |
| General guidance: |
|
|
| * Ops that do reductions should probably execute in ``float32``, |
| * Any op that does a convolution or gemm under the hood should |
| probably execute in ``float16``, and |
| * Other ops with multiple floating-point tensor inputs should standardize |
| them to a common precision (unless the implementation supports inputs with different precisions). |
|
|
| If your custom op falls into the third category, the ``promote_type`` template |
| helps figure out the widest floating-point type present among input tensors, which is |
| the safest choice for the execution type: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: cpp |
|
|
| #include <ATen/autocast_mode.h> |
|
|
| Tensor my_multiple_input_op_autocast(const Tensor& t0, const Tensor& t1) { |
| c10::impl::ExcludeDispatchKeyGuard no_autocast(c10::DispatchKey::Autocast); |
| // The required at::kHalf argument is an optimistic initial guess. |
| auto exec_type = at::autocast::promote_type(at::kHalf, t0, t1); |
| return my_multiple_input_op(at::autocast::cached_cast(exec_type, t0), |
| at::autocast::cached_cast(exec_type, t1)); |
| } |
|
|
| If your custom op is :ref:`autograd-enabled<autograd-support>`, you only need to write and register |
| an autocast wrapper for the same name onto which the autograd wrapper is registered. |
| For example, if you wanted an autocast wrapper for the ``myadd`` function shown |
| in the autograd section, all you |
|
|
| .. code-block:: cpp |
|
|
| Tensor myadd_autocast(const Tensor& self, const Tensor& other) { |
| c10::impl::ExcludeDispatchKeyGuard no_autocast(c10::DispatchKey::Autocast); |
| return myadd(at::autocast::cached_cast(<desired dtype>, self), |
| at::autocast::cached_cast(<desired dtype>, other)); |
| } |
|
|
| TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL(myops, Autocast, m) { |
| m.impl("myadd", myadd_autocast); |
| } |
|
|
| There are no separate gymnastics to make the backward method autocast compatible. |
| However, the backward method defined in your custom autograd function will run in the same |
| dtype as autocast sets for the forward method, so you should choose a ``<desired dtype>`` |
| suitable for both your forward and backward methods. |
|
|
| Batched |
| ^^^^^^^ |
|
|
| Batched tensors allow you to write your code in a per-example manner, and then |
| have them be automatically batched when run under a ``vmap`` invocation. The |
| API for writing batching rules is currently under development, but once it is |
| stabilized, you can add support for ``vmap`` for your operators by registering |
| a kernel at the Batched dispatch key. |
|
|
| Tracer |
| ^^^^^^ |
|
|
| The Tracer dispatch key implements support for recording invocations of operators |
| into a trace when you run ``torch.jit.trace``. We intend to provide a |
| boxed fallback that will implement tracing for arbitrary operations, |
| see `issue #41478 <https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/41478>`_ to track |
| progress. |
|
|