text stringlengths 1 299k | label stringclasses 4
values | lang stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
"
Notability of My friend rudra
A tag has been placed on My friend rudra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " | toxic | en |
"
Sorry
I apologize for any Vandalism I may have played a part in, accidentally, as I was trying to figure out how to use the tools on the Editing side Of Wikipedia. How do you Utilize this ""Sandbox?""" | toxic | en |
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Pizza. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. '''' '''' " | toxic | en |
Thanks for replying back. 173.50.64.195 has been driving me nuts and probably s/he is putting false information on the page. Therefore, I requested a page protection for the List of programs broadcast by Qubo page for vandalism and putting future tv shows in which it has not happened yet. | toxic | en |
Interesting...I identify myself for the community, yet Dogru144 declines to. I guess he *IS* a vandal.
Nicolas Leobold, nleobold@msn.com | toxic | en |
)
If you want to translate sources, see Wikisource. That's a great effort to have. It doesn't mean that you are suddenly more competent at the text you are translating than anyone else, and it certainly doesn't give you the right to attack editors.
In addition to lacking a biography for Emperor Ling of Han, the Records of the Three Kingdoms carry no biography for Emperor Shao or Emperor Xian of Han. None of the Han ruling house have biographies in the book. By your own logic, gauge00, this means the Records of the Three Kingdoms cannot be said to start until 220, which is clearly false. I will state again that carrying a person's biography is neither a sufficient nor necessary condition for recording events that occurred during their lifetime.
Good point. ( 21:06 | toxic | en |
Article vandalism is not welcomed here. Please note that your edits will be swiftly rolled back, and you will be banned from editing here, if you do this again. 10:40, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC) | toxic | en |
Can someone remove the reference to an arson attack? My flat is next door but one to Paul's, and I discovered the fire, which started in the bedroom of the deceased's, and was probably caused by a faulty electric fan heater. Thanks | toxic | en |
A tag has been placed on Saint Michael's Church, Paris, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | toxic | en |
hello i am ms weir
At Midnight with a Knife in her Hand.I am back.Please unprotect my Talk-page. | toxic | en |
You [USER] NAILED IT! Like all globalist freaks she's bought and paid for. She turned on her own citizens just like Obama does. She's as evil as Satan himself for the horror she deliberately visited on #Germany | adult_sexism | en |
"
""A criticism of LCEA is that it attempts to eliminate monetary cost analysis, that is replace the currency by which economic decisions are made with an energy currency."" - Why would this be a criticism? More explanation would be appreciated. Thanks.
" | toxic | en |
I'm surprised to see no information on the prostitution scandal in Columbia. Much less notable events are mentioned regularly in Wikipedia and events like this one often have their own pages. | toxic | en |
It's a good question. I've kind of gone back and forth on it over the years, but I've been finding lately that when I've been updating licensees as a result of an acquisition, I've been linking the licensees to the owner's page more often (or at least when I remember to do so). In fact, while I was FCC-less today, I was starting to look at categorization of the larger owners, which is kind of related. The only reason I did the iHeartMedia linking today was because I checked my Watchlist last night for the first time in a while, and saw that there'd been a bunch of changes made in error to the licensees a week or so ago. I figured that while I was cleaning them up anyway, adding the link made sense, and then it was suggested to me that the redirects made more sense than the piping.
Yes, I'd say each of the state pages should absolutely be uniform, just the same as how the alphabetical lists are uniform and the frequency pages are at least uniform-ish. I'd lean toward linking all of the columns other than the frequency, although I wouldn't suggest redlinking licensees where the owner doesn't have a page. That said, that's just my opinion - it's a question that should probably be put to the project, to see what those who are still active in the project think. It'd be a big chunk of work to implement if links end up having to be added, although it's the kind of gnoming that's right up my alley, as you know. >) | toxic | en |
Otherwise, the article looks good. | toxic | en |
:::::::I am outraged that none of the Featured Articles I'm the primary author of made that list of most-viewed TFAs. I guess no one loves Joy Division like we do. Fools. | toxic | en |
::Their are various agencies that come out with such data and often it is conflicting depending on their methods. Here is an article where the author makes some very valid points about various holes in the way this particular data was collected and analysed: http://www.business-standard.com/common/storypage.php?autono=294226&leftnm;=4&subLeft;=0&chkFlg;= | toxic | en |
Actually, it appears that you were dumbfoundedso you decided (all by yourself ) to lash out and add new material attacking Di Lorenzo, Woods, Charles Adams and Jeffrey Rogers Hummel. What happened to obtaining consensus before you post? That what you keep preaching to me? That's right, it only applies to people who disagree with you. It is funny that you will quote Hummel to criticize Woods; but you would not dare quote him accurately about the causes of the Civil War on the Secession, Lincoln or Causes of the Civil War pages. Hint: It wasn't about slaverly; but you insist on implying a hostility to black people which reveals your true motives. I like your new addition, because it demonstrates what a biased editor you are, better than anything I could ever write. The joke is on you. People will just want to read the books. The majority is already against you.74.192.7.135 | toxic | en |
98 - 0432
can you please extend sitara deal # 156657 for 3 / 1 / 00 , if the deal will
allow ? it was transported on the 215 k , which was the only one out there for
2 / 00 .
it spilled over into march on day 1 for . 423 dec .
thanks
- jackie -
3 - 9497 | scam | en |
"== Jesse Jackson ==
This article is a disgrace to Wikipedia. Jesse Jackson has built his name around controversy. That is how Jesse Jackson has become the person he is. The fact that you can barely find any of his controversial mishaps in his write-up shows an obvious bias in the manner in which Wikipedia has decided to present this article. Jesse Jackson is a controversial figure, he intends to be controversial. Jesse Jackson is currently one of the most controversial public figures, yet reading this Wikipedia article you would not know why. There is a problem with that. I see no logical reason why Wikipedia does not want this information to be known. This article is exemplifies where this site has gone wrong in terms of the original intent of the Wikipedia project.
You talk about Wikipedia as if there is one person who wrote this entire article (""Wikipedia does not want this information to be known""). Look around. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone. If you don't like something in the article, you are free to try to make some changes. But one word of caution. Your tone suggests that you may have an agenda against Jackson (and that's fine), and Wikipedia must be balanced and appropriately weighted according to reality, maintaining a neutral point of view. Ideally, edits are made such that it is difficult to know the editor's personal opinions. If you feel you can improve the article based on reliable sources with these guidelines and policies in mind, then by all means, go for it. " | toxic | en |
Ok, so far I have been able to find a couple of sources, made some additions to the article and slight corrections. I also reformatted some information, based on the format of the Manchester article, which was recently given WP:FA status. Let me know if my work complies better with policy. Thanks. | toxic | en |
Another ascertainment is that you added a new topic, but did not put in the correct place, namely underneath the last topic,
but in front of the false pretenses you invented in the topic right below! You should keep in mind it is not desirable for Wikipedia as a whole to have members distort and falsify both the discussion context and the image of a great man. | toxic | en |
and asking top stop involving me | toxic | en |
I would like to use this talk page for communicating with admins and you 86.182.171.135 | toxic | en |
Umm... Midwest Airlines is BASED OUT OF MILWAUKEE and is probably the company most closely associated with Milwaukee behind Miller and Harley. Not to mention that is has a greater presence both locally (Midwest Airlines Center ring a bell?) and nationally. Besides, airlines generally tend to have greater visibility than financial companies. | toxic | en |
Ditto, we have tags as such. andother english sources sugest tehsame too. | toxic | en |
It looks like this page was marked for deletion by a fundamentalist Christian. I can't help but wonder whether he was being objective at the time. | toxic | en |
"
Edit Request
Please add this somewhere: ""Nowhere in the panorama of world religious traditions, from ancient times to the present, do we find such a strong presence of the feminine voice within the divinity as we do in the Hindu complex of religion."" " | toxic | en |
"
Not responding to the merits of any of the points you have bring up, you have still not shown how Kelly is purposefully disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. She isn't. So don't accuse people of things they aren't guilty of. If you don't agree with her methods of trying to modify the procedure then you can say so, but it's unaccpetable to accuse her of violating some policy that she hasn't. It's like accusing someone of vandalism when their intent wasn't to vandalize (e.g. they just messed up); you simply don't do it. " | toxic | en |
"
It's going pretty well. Writing essays, reading textbooks, you know- the usual! [talk] " | toxic | en |
"
Also, I don't know if you find this relevant on the matter, but Turian himself was blocked just the other day for acting uncivil towards me, towards some other admins and on WP:ANI. He was specifically blocked for violating WP:CIVIL and WP:DISRUPTIVE (the same ones he is accusing me of now). This is obviously some kind of grudge (WP:GRUDGE). I have always maintained myself civil and professional on every matter including when discussing with Turian. He also stated he'd stop editing at the Pro Wrestling WikiProject and would leave me alone in his unblock request. By recently editing WT:PW and my talk page, he obviously isn't following his word. That is indeed a violation of WP:CIVIL 2C. (""lying to mislead""). '''''G (talk)''''' " | toxic | en |
Adam
I think adam will be in this one i knoiw he was suffocated to death with a plastic bag but maybe he's alive oh and maybe in saw2 they replaced his body with a skull | toxic | en |
"
Better late than never:
""It always surprises me how eager many Republicans try to justify the terrorism of the Provisional IRA by saying they were soldiers in a war. Look at Northern Ireland today, its still part of the United Kingdom, the Provisional IRA has disbanded, Ian Paisley is the First Minister, the Irish Republic has given up its claim to the North and has named the Provisional IRA as an illegal organisation. If the troubles was a war, then the Republicans definitely lost. These people, who so many of you want to give the honour of POW, were murderers, criminals and thugs. These are the people who in 1983 killed six people shopping in Harrods, how were shoppers preventing a united Ireland? I can not imagine the thought process that goes through even the most ardent Republican’s mind to make these terrorists soldiers and prisoners of war. Open your eyes and see what they did, do you really want to give them such respect?"" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.155.76.139 (talk • contribs)." | toxic | en |
==RfD nomination of Making of The Passion of the Christ==
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. | toxic | en |
" Large litters are typical in areas where fox mortality is high. Kits are born blind, deaf and toothless, with dark brown fluffy fur. At birth, they weigh 56-110 g and measure 14.5 cm in body length and 7.5 cm in tail length." | toxic | en |
Promoted at work. Used to be chief gingerbread designer now chief metal detective of gingerbread produce #dreamcometrue | cyber | en |
cagayan valley brigada 104 batrrallion | toxic | en |
I think there should be an article for her noms? | toxic | en |
REDIRECT Talk:Welcome to Sweden (2014 TV series) | toxic | en |
Another amazing and neutral wikipedia article *cough* *cough*...(yes it is an irony) ==
Another Zodiac article full of Npov issues and even misinterprations of the sources.Why...?
Well because some people add to much negative traits or some others add way to much positive traits. There are even people that when they give a source they totally misinterpretate that source for their own personal agenta (i do not believe in coincidences in this site)
Taurus is not a perfect zodiac. IT HAS GOOD BUT ALSO BAD QUALITIES just like every zodiac.
Some people must get that into their arrogant heads and stay neutral when they contribute or some reports to the Administrator will start happening around here for Non-neutral point of view activity. I am not a professional astrologer but i have enough astrological knowledge and i understand when someone is being neutral and contributes 100% exactly from what a source says...and who is not doing that.
As the current situation goes in here i advice people not to trust reading the astrological signs from wikipedia.
== | toxic | en |
"As for the notability of Yamal, Phil Jones (among others) thinks it is important and it does supply a ""hockey stick"" recon, eh? Albeit a heavily-criticized one. One has to wonder why there is no mention at all here - or at Climategate, last I looked " | toxic | en |
re : a 3 al ad hoc review team
in the week of the 25 th . , the 26 th and 27 th are fine , with the 27 th being
the best .
thanks , john
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : holden - baker , susan - tms - ditt 2 [ mailto : smholden @ bpa . gov ]
sent : wednesday , june 13 , 2001 9 : 14 am
to : ' ellingson , mons m ( z 34655 ) ' ; ' harshbarger , robert ' ; ' fotiou ,
demetrios ' ; ' grow , lisa ' ; ' smith , chris ' ; ' tilghman , carmine ' ;
' underwood , john ' ; ' williams , bill ' ; ' dempsey @ wapa . gov '
subject : re : a 3 al ad hoc review team
i added my available dates below - thanks mons !
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : ellingson , mons m ( z 34655 ) [ mailto : mons . ellingson @ pinnaclewest . com ]
sent : wednesday , june 13 , 2001 6 : 32 am
to : ' harshbarger , robert ' ; ' fotiou , demetrios ' ; ' grow , lisa ' ; ' smith ,
chris ' ; ' tilghman , carmine ' ; ' underwood , john ' ; ' williams , bill ' ;
' dempsey @ wapa . gov ' ; ' holden - baker , susan '
subject : re : a 3 al ad hoc review team
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : bill . williams . iii @ enron . com [ mailto : bill . williams . iii @ enron . com ]
sent : wednesday , june 13 , 2001 6 : 16 am
to : ellingson , mons m ( z 34655 )
subject : re : a 3 al ad hoc review team
mons ,
i would be available on the 25 th , 26 th or 27 th . i cannot make it the week
of the 18 th .
thanks ,
bill
- - - - - original message - - - - -
ok ,
so far it looks likes this . " yes " is a date you can meet , " no " you can ' t .
18 19 21 22 25 26 27
jerry no no no no no no yes
mons no yes no no yes yes yes
robert
dometrios
lisa
chris
carmine
john
bill no no no no yes yes yes
susan no yes yes yes yes yes yes
thanks !
mons
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : harshbarger , robert [ mailto : bharsh @ puget . com ]
sent : tuesday , june 12 , 2001 5 : 56 pm
to : ellingson , mons m ( z 34655 ) ; ' fotiou , demetrios ' ; ' grow , lisa ' ;
' smith , chris ' ; ' tilghman , carmine ' ; ' underwood , john ' ; ' williams ,
bill ' ; ' dempsey @ wapa . gov ' ; ' holden - baker , susan '
cc : hackney , mark w ( z 39911 )
subject : re : a 3 al ad hoc review team
great suggestion . yes , a meeting is needed , especially for same day
timelines .
may i suggest the conference center meeting rooms at the portland airport ?
a fly - in , fly - out meeting 9 : 30 a . m . to 3 : 30 p . m .
if you have a better location or better idea , speak - up . otherwise , i ' ll
check on availability of a room . looks like we are down to the last two
weeks of this month - 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 25 , 26 , or 27 .
i ' ll try to send out a list of topics for an agenda tomorrow .
robert harshbarger
puget sound energy
oasis trading manager
425 . 882 . 4643 ( desk )
206 . 604 . 3251 ( cell ) | scam | en |
== William S. Sadler ==
William S. Sadler is a WP:GA and already a very fine element of content for the project. I am not a medical expert and it is in a pretty highly developed state. It is not an article that I could really help out a lot without a lot of research and effort. Try either WP:PR or pinging some of the talk page project. I added a few projects to the talk page. ///WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) | toxic | en |
You see, that's the problem with you, you always believe you're right, and therefore you don't accept dissenting opinions. This talk page exemplifies this very well. | toxic | en |
He gets those too, haven't you seen the maps he imagined in his wet dreams? Wait till he sees the map I just uploaded. He's definitely going to need diapers after that. | toxic | en |
My say ...
Indeed I will, I see this as constructive, would an apology suffice? | toxic | en |
AS PEr NOTTHEM I'm Only Shining Light WHICH YOU NEED TO SEE. | toxic | en |
Urgent
Plz copy and paste this link stardust, i want you to have it. )
http://www.wondercomments.com/i_love_you/i_love_you_comment_09.gif | toxic | en |
Guernsey City and New Guernsey are still probably based off New Jersey and Jersey City so it should stay. - | toxic | en |
telephone interview with the research group
tammy :
please excuse the error on the email below . i misunderstood - the position
will be a full - time position with the research group .
look forward to hearing from you . thanks !
shirley crenshaw
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by shirley crenshaw / hou / ect on 04 / 27 / 2000
09 : 50 am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
shirley crenshaw
04 / 27 / 2000 09 : 41 am
to : dasyuan @ yahoo . com
cc :
subject : telephone interview with the research group
good morning tammy :
the enron corp . research group would like to conduct a telephone
interview with you at your convenience . this will be as a " summer
intern " with the research group .
please let me know your availability on monday , may lst or thursday ;
may 4 th .
the persons who will be interviewing you are :
vince kaminski managing director
stinson gibner vice president
krishna krishnarao director
osman sezgen manager
i look forward to hearing from you .
thank you and have a great day
shirley crenshaw
administrative coordinator
713 - 852 - 5290 | scam | en |
" (UTC)
Well, yes, but from an academic or scientific point of view, his contributions are practically nil. This is not a personal attack; being a non-valuer where it counts is par for the course where it comes to this kind of ""scientist"" - editors, deans, governmental advisors, christmas lecture deliverers et cetera et cetera Too bad the crown persist in handing out honours to the crowd of parasites, too bad that these are the prominent scientists in the public eye..2.103.197.76 11:40, 14 June 2015" | toxic | en |
A picture of the prison, anyone? June 28, 2005 17:18 (UTC) | toxic | en |
WikiProject Indian Premier League|importance=low|class=C}}
{{ | toxic | en |
Good news!
I've just (accidantally) gotten in touch with admin and she says if we find anymore Komodo Lover sockpuppets just drop a line at her talk page. ;) | toxic | en |
position report for dual trigger product
vince ,
i have enclosed a summary of our proposed approach on calculation of notional and the greeks for dual trigger option portfolio . please let us know your thoughts / comments .
amitava | scam | en |
October 2005 (UTC)
I may be pulling ahead in the overall edit count race, but you seem to have a clear lead in the
25 points, User:Willmcw, 103 days admin, 9 times reverted
44 points, User:SlimVirgin, 200 days admin, 31 times reverted
Thanks for taking the heat. - 10:25, 11 | toxic | en |
"
:::: If an article is written that encompasses the differences at issue, I'll gladly find the links and point them there instead. However, I will not restore disambiguation links, since those are inherently erroneous, and since the disambiguation page itself gives even less information about the possible meanings of the term than the current target. " | toxic | en |
::Is he still here and an Admin? I thought he had dissapeared or been fired or something. I must be losing touch. Funny old place Wikipedia these days. | toxic | en |
"
Re:
Hi Kokar - I'll be glad to be of help. Don't be frustrated over your inability to edit certain articles - those restrictions will go away in a couple of days. I had to face the same thing 2-3 weeks ago. Others may disagree with you now and again, but you're an intelligent editor as anyone can see, so your contribution(s) will always be welcome. One thing to note - India is a WP:FA, which means that there is a greater quality control over content. Read WP:WIAFA, so you'll know exactly how to edit the article. (Visnu) " | toxic | en |
Is the list hurting anything or anybody for being there, and how do you define a list as being trivial. It's not hard to source all of the videos that YouTube banned from the charts after accusations of spamming, they can still be found on the website and if someone want to add a missing video they just found they can do so, just remembering to source it, and if someone want to check if the views listed are accurate, just click the link and find out, and either change and/or update it. Look, I really don't want to start an edit war here, you must be afraid of a little change, to article that may need this list. | toxic | en |
"
:My thoughts exactly, when I first noticed the blood type thing. Pretty sure that is going into way too much sensitive data, and without physically verifying medical records, we'd only be taking a ""website's"" word for it. Saying that though, there is nothing on any Wiki-guide pages that stipulates not to include blood types (although common-sense would indicate not to include them). Perhaps its time to update a policy somewhere to show a person's blood type shouldn't be included on BLP articles. " | toxic | en |
First, there is no question whatsoever about your replacement being better than the original black-on-black!
Offhand I would prefer something showing a little more contrast, perhaps the light green color that is now standard.
Adding the phone plug to the picture does add context. I would suggest using one that does not have the threaded retainer for the quarter inch adapter. Perhaps adding a measurement scale to the picture would help also. | toxic | en |
::: You won't get your way by being a bully to other editors! | toxic | en |
"
Eyewitness News
Please prove KDKA-TV's ""Eyewitness News"" branding was inspired by KYW. Removed this unsourced speculation. 07:56, 5 February 2006
Other" | toxic | en |
"
I agree. It does seem like a copy and paste job with little to no citations, and rather overly-dramatic language for an encyclopedia article (""The mob in the street shrieked its delight at the last message."" being another example of this). Someone should clean this up. " | toxic | en |
== Neutral Point of View on Articles on Fringe Topics ==
I don't know if this is a problem with this article specifically, but I posted this on some other articles relating to 9/11 conspiracy theories and thought it might be helpful here.
In articles on fringe topics, we are not supposed represent the fringe theory as if it is a legitimate viewpoint or on some kind of equal footing. Instead, we're supposed to fairly represent all sides of an issue per reliable sources. If reliable sources reflect a particular viewpoint, then we're supposed to represent that viewpoint as well. In a case such as this article, I doubt if there are many (if any) reliable sources that claim the WTC was destroyed via controlled demolition. Even if there are any, weight should be roughly proportional to the preponderance of reliable sources backing that perspective.
As a result, there might be a WP:NPOV issue with this article. This article should treat this topic in the same manner as reliable sources do. Thus, if NIST, Popular Mechanics, the BBC, ABC News, Time Magazine, etc. regard the controlled demolition conspiracy theory as outlandish bunk unsupported by factual evidence, that that's how this article should be written. To do otherwise, is against WP:NPOV.
In other words, the viewpoints of reliable sources are the standard by which we write our articles and judge its neutrality. | toxic | en |
"==Length of time with WWE==
The first paragraph says he is one of the longest tenured performers with the company, having joined in 1990, but the article itself says he first was hired in 1987, then fired, then rehired in 1988. I know for a fact Shawn was in WWF pre-1990, so can this please be changed to read 1988 or possibly 1987?
==Trivia section==
Should we work on that?
:Ok, question. Are Shawn and Bret really real-life enemies? Cause I thought Shawn wanted amends with Bret!!!
A lot of bridges were burned and fences broken between them. That I can tell a lot of the old hostility has diminished, but they will likely never be on the same page. A lot of negative to overcome.
:Well, that explains a lot!!!! Thank you, Smobro68.
==Fair use rationale for Image:SMBoyHoodDream.jpg==
:Image:SMBoyHoodDream.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
== News stories ==
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_kmtmh/is_200601/ai_n16037446
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FCO/is_4_3/ai_80302529
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FCO/is_3_4/ai_91561873
== the reason he is out keeps changing ==
its knee ingury
:Yes; but some people think its a ""concussion""!!! So its kayfabe. And the knee injury is real.
well the knee ingury should be mentioned also because the article is about Michael Shawn Hickenbottom, not the storyline Shawn Michaels.
:It should be added!!! But, some people will look at it and edit it and put the concussion!!!! I think that's why it was removed in the first place!!!!
then get a source and put it there, no logic person will remove it if its a perfectly good sourc | toxic | en |
Yeah do! Don‘t stand to close tho- you‘ll catch something! | scam | en |
Welcome!
Hello, Bellysom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! WikHead | toxic | en |
Consultations
There were two rounds of consultations with regards to the convening of the first IGF:
[1] 16 – 17 of February 2006 – The first round of consultations was held in Geneva. The transcripts for the consultations can be directly found in these links:
February 16, 2006 - TABhttp://intgovforum.org/contributions/IGF-1-0216.txt
TABTABTABhttp://intgovforum.org/contributions/IGF-1-021606pm.txt
February 17, 2006 - http://intgovforum.org/contributions/UN-IGF-AM-2-17-06.txt
TABTABTABhttp://intgovforum.org/contributions/UN-IGF-PM-2-17-06.txt
[2] 19 May 2006 – The second round of consultations was open to all stakeholders and was coordinated for the preparations of the inaugural IGF meeting. The meeting chairman was Nitin Desai is the United Nations Secretary-General's Special Adviser for Internet Governance. A summary of contributions can be found in this direct link: http://intgovforum.org/Summary%20of%20discussions.htm
The Second Meeting of the IGF
Consultations held in Geneva last May 23, 2007 were open to all stakeholders. This consultation was part of a cluster of related events of the WSIS that took place last 15-25 of May 2007. **** http://www.itu.int/wsis/follow-up/index.html An advisory group was also facilitated for the IGF meeting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The IGF open Consultations held last 3 September 2007 was held in Geneva. Transcript can be found at http://www.intgovforum.org/IGF-03Sept07Consultation.txt | toxic | en |
", a modest amount of ""good material"" is the norm." | toxic | en |
what was james wolfe mothers name? | toxic | en |
(Nice touch by Vercalos on the unsigned, - touche.) | toxic | en |
"
Swastika as a mnemonic device
The article needs more information about the swastika's use as a modern mnemonic device. Although the swastika was an ancient symbol, Professor Rex Curry discovered that it was also used sometimes by the National Socialist German workers Party as alphabetic symbolism, including meshed ""S"" letters for their ""socialism."" The leader of German National Socialists at that time altered his own signature to use the same stylized ""S"" letter for ""socialist"" and similar alphabetic symbolism still shows on Volkswagens. Professor Curry showed that many modern myths use a false belief that Nazis called themselves ""Nazis."" The myths cause widespread ignorance of the eytmology of the word ""Nazi."" Party members called themselves ""National Socialists,"" not ""Nazis."" Dr. Curry showed that many modern myths about swastikas use the false belief that Nazis called their symbol a ""swastika."" German National Socialists did not call their symbol a ""swastika."" Another person conceded the point with the comment that ""It does seem to be the case that the National Socialist German Workers' Party originated the 45° orientation...."" though they did not necessarily originate that use, the German National Socialists did independently alter their use of the symbol for their specific desire to highlight the ""S"" letter for ""socialism."" Of course, the additional comment that they didn't use the 45 degree orientation consistently also concedes Professor Curry's work showing that their leader deliberately altered / evolved the symbol from its historic orientation into meshed ""S"" letters for socialism. The graphic resonance is highly suggestive... and in fact it is compelling! In fact, one of the flags that Dr. Curry cites argues for that thesis: The swastika itself comprises two S's, and that is shown to have been known consciously when the German National Socialists overlay two additional S's for another group (as German National Socialists had other examples of similar alphabetic symbolism). Hitler even altered his own signature to reflect the same ""S"" for socialism and similar alphabetic symbolism still shows on Volkswagens. The leader of the German Socialists had no reason to harp on this idea because he was an ex-artist. Nevertheless, he did allude to the alphabetic symbolism in his own comments in his notorious book. Of course, he would not drone on about it just as he did not drone on about what the stylized ""SA"" symbol meant, or the side-by-side ""SS"" symbol, or the ""VW"" (all of which other writers concede for some inconsistent reason). The only reason it is so hard for most people to understand today is because they have been trained to use the hackneyed shorthand for the Party and most people are ignorant of the name of the actual Party, and thus have no idea that the Party actually espoused a dogma that they called ""Socialism."" Even to this day, people repeatedly delete Dr. Curry's work in an effort to perpetuate the ignorance and the myths." | toxic | en |
This article is a mess==
... but so is the field it describes, so maybe that's just par for the course.
How was this ever a featured article? It would need a complete rewrite.
Oh, and why was the archived peer review deleted?
== | toxic | en |
* I don't think that's appropriate. It's a weasel word. | toxic | en |
There's no need to make it personal. If you want, we can discuss it. I believe that Wikipedia is for poeple that aren't physicians. If you want, rewrite it, but at least make it readable for someone that doesn't have an M.D., and has no idea what a Helper T-cell is or anything like that. | toxic | en |
enron / hpl actuals for november 16 , 2000
teco tap 40 . 000 / enron ; 30 . 833 / hpl gas daily | scam | en |
Why delete my page?
Why are you so adament to delete my page?
Your informtation as to why is wrong! | toxic | en |
|military-work-group=yes
|listas=Melzi, Jose de Palafox y, Duke of Saragossa | toxic | en |
False accusations
I have no clue what you are talking about.
You must have the wrong person, i never edited ANI. Nor do I know what it means. | toxic | en |
"
Attitude towards Christians
I have removed the opening sentence ""Tipu was widely reputed to be anti-Christian"". This is not found in the reference provided. Such a harsh, general statement as the opening sentence gives reader no further incentive to read the further paragraphs and is clearly a POV push. If Tipu had built a Christian church at the request of French, then should we also write that he was a Christian missionary? No I guess. Whisper " | toxic | en |
Experts
Yes, it can become somewhat controversial this topic, I am afraid. Anyway, more editing to do. | toxic | en |
Well, as I indicated, my guideline may not be perfect. It is abundantly obvious that Lena Dunham is precisely the sort of article that you must not edit, surely you can see that. | toxic | en |
Page was deleted, it was apparently created by a ban evading user... | toxic | en |
"
Neal, I really like your most recent proposed wording above, and I think defining the term as a religious belief is a good solution. We really need to get away from the ""X is the ability to do Y"" wordings that we've had, and this is a fair way to do it. Part of the problems these articles have had is that they try to cherrypick different elements from religious and scientific views, mixing and matching to try and present the topic in the most favorable light. I'd be fine with presenting this article completely from a religious/spiritual perspective, describing it as a belief throughout, but I suspect some want to include the study of mediumship at universities and such. We can, and probably should include mention of the term being used in a more general sense by the general public. We may also want to include mention of research into mediumship, but obviously such a section would have to be balanced and include response to and criticism of that research as well. If the research side stays in the article, I'd recommend putting it in a section separate from the religious discussion instead of mingling the two throughout as it is now. " | toxic | en |
"
== GA Review #2 ==
{{#if:???|{{#ifeq:|Talk||}}}}
:GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose): b (MoS):
#::
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
#::
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects): b (focused):
#::
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias:
#::
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.:
#::
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
#::
#Overall:
#:Pass/Fail:
#::
Just a few little things. Interesting article! — () " | toxic | en |
Rights ==
From what i can see any TOM, DICK and HARRY can edit on Wiki hhaha.
It's important for Croats on Wiki to keep Serb Pov out of anything to do with pages about Croats and Croatia.
I strongly dislike such things as Rudjer Josip Boscovich article where he is being called Serb when he was Croat. The Serb Pov on that and many articles is not on.
Vuk Kardazic was a Serb patriot and his sources and theory are bougus at best...shame many Serbs believe him to this day.
== | toxic | en |
Comment
Cited academic works that have been vetted by peer review are not POV, and are probably some of the hardest forms of source to contradict. When I say peer review, I mean by those in academia - not our own peer review process. Your claims that they are an author's POV are spurious at best. The books he used are highly researched publications by noted members of their fields who spent years researching this subject.
You will need some serious sources to counter those presented by Chris. Also, before you go challenging his research, I wish to remind you of Chris' bona fides: he is a published author who is finishing his PhD in Gastronomy from Boston University, a major American University. You really need to step up if you wish to contradict his work. (blah blah) | toxic | en |
Fine, but would it get us in trouble with Marvel? I mean, its not like we're making off a profit off of it or anything. Its a free site, and if anything more like free advertising. 01:26, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC) | toxic | en |
Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) before adding wikilinks to articles, thank you. | toxic | en |
Support, no reason not to move this. '''''' (talk) | toxic | en |
We have their Pictures, now we need to send a CIA Hit team to hunt them down & Kill them. These Muslim pieces of shit are free because of the USA. Oh, I forgot, the CIA is busy trying to overthrow the Government and Constitution of the USA. | adult_sexism | en |
"
::::Still nothing. When it opens in edit mode does it look like regular edit mode (mine does) or am I supposed to see something different, such as the changes the script made? To me it looks like regular edit mode. " | toxic | en |
"
== DYK for White-capped Albatross ==
{| class=""messagebox -talk""
|-
|
|On March 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with from the article White-capped Albatross, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
|} thx " | toxic | en |
Get a grip on your trigger happy CSD finger, please
You put a completely unwarrented CSD notice on Visual Researchers' Society of Canada. Might I suggest instead of spending your time writing off the work of others, you contribute something useful yourself. | toxic | en |
No, because all concerned parties also include the people editing the seperate infobox, so you need to inform them too. The seperate infobox still contains the EU, so until conesensus can be gained on both they should remain consistent. | toxic | en |
"*I'd still like a compromise like the one used in the Vietnamese article: ""Linguafranc"" (Tiếng Nhật: リンガ・フランカ Ringa Furanka, Tiếng Anh: Lingua franca)! That means as seen in the Vietnamese article, I'd like the original Japanese title due to the fact it's the only officially given song title (by both labels). Additionaly, I'd like to acknowledge that some people know the song by linguafranc no matter whether it is a misspelling, a fan title or not. Plus, I'd like the correct English term Lingua Franca displayed because it's de facto the correct English term and English translation for the Japanese title as well as what is officially used (by composer etc.). That would be something like this: リンガ・フランカ (romanization: Ringa Furanka; English: Lingua Franca; largely known as: linguafranc). As far as I can see * and I are for this compromise while * and * seemingly are against any compromise/consensus in favor of enforcing their personal believes. Did I get each faction right?
" | toxic | en |
"
Dont remove without argument see ez 1244 and last CG statmant there is no terms ""Serbia"" they iusse only Yougoslavia" | toxic | en |
: Yup, you did great. Thank you | toxic | en |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.