text stringlengths 1 299k | label stringclasses 4
values | lang stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
For real tho this sucks. I can't even cook my whole electricity is out. And I'm hungry. | scam | en |
Lol. Instead of spamming me a long winded response, why don't you take my advice and explain your edit. | toxic | en |
Person A: Hello, how's your day going? Person B: It's been great, thanks. Just went to a wine tasting and it was a delightful experience. How about you? Person A: I'm doing fine. I've been learning to do woodworking in my free time. Person B: That sounds fascinating! What kind of woodworking have you been creating? Person A: I've been making traditional furniture and modern sculptures, it's been quite rewarding. Person B: That's really wonderful. I'd love to see your woodworking work sometime. Person A: Definitely! I'll show you my creations. So, any plans for the upcoming weekend? Person B: I'm thinking of going to a music festival for some cultural experiences. Person A: That sounds delightful! I might join you for that. Person B: Absolutely, it'll be a great musical experience. Looking forward to it. Well, I should get back to work. Person A: Sounds good. Have a productive day, talk to you later. Person B: You too, take care and have a great day! Person A: Thanks, bye! | scam | en |
"
Talk:Presidency of Barack Obama
What is your rationale behind removing the comment on Talk:Presidency of Barack Obama ()? I don't see anything that violates talk page guidelines, the editor that made it had a legitimate question about article content. '''''' (TALK) " | toxic | en |
free me
i have been banned free me you are my only hope of freedom from being banned | toxic | en |
"
I understand what the confusion is about. But for clarity, let's clear this out: These are the contentious edits and their summaries:
""That feels like WP:WEASEL""
""Inferred by TBA status""
""To me, this says ""they're on the entry list, but we don't really believe it will happen""
""Same as before""
Crucially you only went to the talk page after making these edits. These edits were then followed 4 hours and 24 minutes later by three edits to correctly format the footnotes after you were again reverted by User:Twirlypen 2 hours 28 minutes later
""If this is going to be done, it should be done like this (need to make two more edits before changes are fully visible""
Now I have two questions:
1) Can you understand why contributors could consider those first four edits as edit-warring, especially considering those summaries.
2) Why did you not indicate in your edit summary for the last two edits of that contentious set of four that you were reformatting them and thus making consistent with community opinion if that was your goal and why did you remove the content entirely in the first place if you only wanted to reformat?
I still don't think you actually broke WP:3RR because the policy clearly states a series of continuous, uninterrupted edits can be considered to be one revert. I can understand though that this is deemed to be a minor edit war. " | toxic | en |
Lon Milo Duquette
Just a quick note that WP:V requires third-party sources. Notablity hinges not on what a person says about themselves, but on what coverage they have had in the media. | toxic | en |
"
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. " | toxic | en |
Jerry Williams AFD
Thanks for informing me about the nature of the league. I normally try to steer clear of AFDs to do with sports but there were few comments so I tried to get the ball rolling, glad someone could correct me though. I have changed my opinion on the matter and edited the AFD as appropriate. Cheers - | toxic | en |
"
::::::::Third-party is in relation to the topic itself; an ""independent"" source. This follows the plain definition of ""third-party"". (""No original research"" is what says, essentially, that Wikipedia and its editors are not permitted as sources.) Beyond that, Wikipedia articles are supposed to be a summary of reliably published independent scholarship about the topic. This is not achieved by depending on primary materials. That is not to say such references are not helpful or even perfectly appropriate to use in some ways. As I state above, primary sources are quite good for illustrative purposes and providing context. Third-party (independent) sources should be the main material upon which an article draws. Not only is this good sense in the context of the project and its principle rules, it is absolutely essential to fulfill the ""neutral point of view"" (which is the proportional representation of the body of available reliably published material). " | toxic | en |
I am currently doing a PDH assignment for year 10, and need to survey people about this. Your answer would be a great help. | toxic | en |
"
== Tone and references ==
Hello Jmh649,
I appreciate your help. This is my first Wikipedia article.
I will go through and try to correct the tone to use proper encyclopedic language.
The issue about references is a more difficult one. I understand the need for recent secondary source references, and do my best to provide secondary source material. However, so far I have been unable to find any review articles where the authors are not funded by, or associated with, dairy councils, pharmaceutical companies, or large food and beverage corporations. Their articles may say they ""have no conflict of interest"", but I disagree. " | toxic | en |
Sorting
Is there a way to do a global Sort command? Here's the situation: I like to
sort by date every folder. I'm cleaning up my inbox from most recent to oldest,
since I find this direction most efficient (I guess because it helps me
recognize the significance of individual, old messages). But this adds messages
to my other folders in the wrong order. When I'm done, I'd like to re-sort all
the folders I've changed.
--
rick
_______________________________________________
Exmh-users mailing list
Exmh-users@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users
| scam | en |
"
:Sure will do. Be a shame for all your good work to go to waste.''' " | toxic | en |
irc.freenode.net wikipedia host cloak
I would like a wikipedia cloak on IRC. My IRC nick is bsmntbombdood. I have followed all the steps at Wikipedia:IRC cloaks. Thanks. | toxic | en |
Cleaned up some info on the general page, the new album is already released! | toxic | en |
"
== ""Dixie"", ""Dixie's Land"", ""I Wish I Was in Dixie"", I wish I was disambiguated ==
Not a big problem: I've seen this sort of thing happen on things with, like, 250 links. | " | toxic | en |
Schooling means nothing and doesn't prep you for the real world. Any idiot can get a STEM degree but few will benefit from it. | adult_sexism | en |
"
""Controversially"" is a perfectly acceptable word when describing the usage of ""conspiracy theory"". To put things simply, anyone using ""conspiracy theory"" in a scientific or encyclopedic context is trying to trick people, not trying to advance science neutrally. Funny you should say it's ""not clear what a dubious narrative genre is"" since that was your argument over on Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory. Another thing I find funny is this unclear dubious narrative genre can somehow be used to defend a phrase from a charge of non neutral presentation. In my opinion we should completely rewrite ""narrative genre"" but since your argument passed (for now) over on Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory we are stuck with it, sorry. T " | toxic | en |
Yeah, you're probably right. I try to avoid long conversations on other people's talk pages, but not necessarily a short remark. Sorry if it bothered you... - (Talk) | toxic | en |
REDIRECT Talk:Performers of When the Saints Go Marching In | toxic | en |
I concede Lucy wasn't as buff as my memory thinks she was. Maybe the stunt doubles for the action shots? | adult_sexism | en |
"
When I first heard of ""coldplay,"" I thought it was the name of a sandwich, like come cold cut corn beef with rye. Imagine how shocked I am to learn that this cold sandwich consisting of castrated schoolboys is pretending to be a talented music group. lol Yet you bring a champion of cold cuts to dispute music with me? A champion of cold cuts is going to argue about Soviet Russia with me? Spare me this insult, please, and you know you brought this on yourself by throwing away my smart music edits of the past.
" | toxic | en |
Oppose - They could be their own article, but not in this one. | toxic | en |
::He liked the Countess and in the Chocolate box her fancyed the chick in it. | toxic | en |
"Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ∞Talk " | toxic | en |
REDIRECT Talk:Standing in the Shadows of Motown | toxic | en |
"
Aduri
I ask you that you re-consider the closure as no-consensus. !vote-wise delete is ahead, but reading the !votes and looking at the sources it is clear that the argument for deletion as per WP:NF was stronger. There was exactly one good argument to keep, and it was User:Schmidt's argument. But even he recognized it as ""weak"", and really the sources he provided wer enot osurces of notability, not existence. It should have been closed as delete, as it really doesn't meet the criteria for notability that apply.
Since you closed the original AfD, and it was submitted for relisting, I think you should have refrained from closing the second AfD. No biggie, its not like I am upset or anything, but I think it was not a good judgement. Just something to think about. " | toxic | en |
"
""pro-Japan anti-Korea/China bias""? Why just because I want all articles in a game series to match? If you read this - Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-12-21_Street_Fighter_character_articles - you'll see why I've moved the articles. And it's nothing to do with Japan or Korea. " | toxic | en |
so have i already fucked up by adding her as a connection on linkedin? | adult_sexism | en |
"
No, they are not from reliable sources. — [ ChitChat ] " | toxic | en |
"
And what I'm writing is classified as an attack, but what Mr. Spaceman is doing (false allegations, as proved; and ""you are wasting time"") is not personal attacks and harassment ?" | toxic | en |
A woman qualifying is a defense mechanism to preserve her emotional state which in this case is our back door into getting locked in with her. Backdoors to the mind are fun. | adult_sexism | en |
Guanine là một dẫn xuất thuộc nhóm purine. | toxic | vi |
Noted. 96.252.161.209 | toxic | en |
"\
The Signpost: 01 October 2014
Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
Please comment on Talk:List of Patriarchs of Alexandria
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Patriarchs of Alexandria. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. —
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2014)
Hello, Calidum.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:
Previous selections:
Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: on behalf of •
Please comment on Talk:Iranian-led intervention in Iraq
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Iranian-led intervention in Iraq. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. —
The Signpost: 08 October 2014
'''Read this Signpost in full' | toxic | en |
Taking a religious, spiritual, or philosphical idea and making some vague analogy to some scientific concept (even if such an analogy accurately describes the scientific idea, which they usually don't) does not in any sense make that idea scientific. | toxic | en |
:The Nature of 22-Pistepirkko
A tag has been placed on The Nature of 22-Pistepirkko, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (aeropagitica) | toxic | en |
FYI: Please see this: User talk:Central. If there isn't a comment from me to Central here check the history. | toxic | en |
== PA Turnpike ==
I understand (and even support) what you are trying to do; but I would advise you to leave things alone until some sort of consensus develops. The user who reverted it may simply do so again and we don't want an edit war. | toxic | en |
"
== Mechanisms of manipulation of this article / NPOV ==
Could an objective editor help me theorize on how this article is so sickeningly subjective? I mean is it just the sheer number of people posting biased propaganda, or is there some complex politics with people donating money to Wikipedia to somehow achieve ground? I'd like to help the article be more unbiased but what can I do as an individual against the sheer magnitude of this violation of the spirit of Wikipedia?
Just Google ""flu shot dangers"" and up come a staggering plethora of reputable objective sites with serious well-referenced cons, not some message board hogwash of a few individuals ranting about poorly-backed conspiracy theories. Cross-referencing all those sites with this article, particularly the side effects section, yields a baffling discrepancy. I can't begin to regurgitate all the details, but I think anyone objective having a good sense of identifying objectivity from bull should be able to see the staggering difference in the total weight of the medical statistics and studies quoted in the anti- flu shot articles, and this article.
This ""side effect"" session uses intrinsically structurally questionable wording akin to ""Although [trivialized concerns]...the CDC says [there's nothing to worry about]"", without mentioning the CDC's advisory committee on the matter has a vested financial interest in promoting flu shots. It's a basic fallacy via omission of key information. The entire article in general promotes a flu shot, so at the absolute least, a ""side effect"" section should solidly represent negatives.
Could an objective editor who's taken the time to thumb through all the negative articles on the net help me understand why they're so underrepresented? My big question is whether working to make the article more objective/NPOV will even yield any results, or will my edits just be mysteriously deleted with no justification by the entities who've obtained control of the article. How can Wikipedia allow this? " | toxic | en |
Please do not contribute text in Indonesian to English Wikipedia. Your contributions are more than welcome at the Indonesian Wikipedia. | toxic | en |
ec 254 , sp 13 and wc 45 ( 20 ) revisions
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by ami chokshi / corp / enron on 06 / 12 / 2000
10 : 00 am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
" steve holmes " on 06 / 12 / 2000 09 : 52 : 18 am
to : ,
cc :
subject : ec 254 , sp 13 and wc 45 ( 20 ) revisions
clarissa ,
per our conversation last week , we are unable to increase ec 254 , sp 13 and
wc 45 ( 20 ) due to the tennessee seal on the 800 leg . this shall confirm the
volumes will remain at first of the month levels until the seal is lifted .
at that time , i will recalculate the changes and notify you of any changes at
that time .
thanks ,
steve | scam | en |
Hi. I read the article. Very good. It kept my interest. 16:12, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC) | toxic | en |
Phân phối Bernoulli là một phân phối xác suất đơn giản được sử dụng để mô hình hóa các biến ngẫu nhiên chỉ có hai kết quả có thể xảy ra, thường được ký hiệu là 0 và 1. Nó được sử dụng để tính xác suất của một sự kiện xảy ra hoặc không xảy ra trong một thí nghiệm đơn lẻ. Đây là một phân phối rời rạc, trong đó xác suất của sự kiện thành công (kết quả 1) được ký hiệu là p và xác suất của sự kiện thất bại (kết quả 0) là 1-p. | toxic | vi |
FAC:The Language Movement
Language Movement have improved exceedingly well under the observation of Dwaipayan. But at the moment, he is too busy to contribute. So please provide any last minute help that you can offer. Thanks - | toxic | en |
change - video to teleconferences - enron
fyi
vince
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by vince j kaminski / hou / ect on 02 / 16 / 2001
10 : 06 am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
fap on 02 / 16 / 2001 08 : 35 : 22 am
to : clay degiacinto , deepa mallik
, dennis feerick
, heather thorne
, jack rejtman
, jason cummins
, kim whitsel
, nicholas levitt
, omar bassel
, ram vittal , steve
lessar , thomas
, tulika bhalla ,
vincent chen
cc : fap , " ' vkamins @ enron . com ' "
, " ' patterm @ wharton . upenn . edu ' "
subject : change - video to teleconferences - enron
3 / 1 shdh 215
3 / 22 shdh 215
3 / 29 shdh 215
please note that the remaining videoconferences scheduled with enron have
been changed to teleconferences due to the difficulties we have experienced .
the host has agreed and we will , therefore , continue with teleconferences in
the same locations / dates as noted above .
any questions , please contact the fap office .
thanks ,
donna | scam | en |
::::Throw block evasion using IP into the mixer, and you have a nice concotion for declining this RfU. By the way, another question: how did you know that admins are meant to decline Requests for Unblock? By the way, non-admins who are in very good standing with the community can decline RfU's under specific circumstances. Not saying that this occasion fitted those circumstances, though. [ · ] | toxic | en |
REDIRECT Talk:Weston Underwood, Buckinghamshire | toxic | en |
Capacitance VS. Voltage
What's better for a capacitor if I want to create a coilgun? High Capacitance or High Voltage? Thanks. | toxic | en |
:Yeah, his first book states that he has performed over 30,000 exorcisms. That is Father Amorth's claim. As he describes them he does not spend hours and hours a day on one person he talks about appointments and makes it sound like he goes through more than four people a day. | toxic | en |
ytmkjngfjkgnhbgjhkjgmkvjvmvjv vjfmxofgmfifmvibg,bkh5524n3h58jmvhgmdhfh btlghjur ituuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu | toxic | en |
Just now saw this, two days after you posted it. I am nothing if not prompt. ( Looking at , I'm inclined to wait-and-see. It's also worth pointing out that checkusers won't look at IP's. So I advise doing nothing at the moment except to stay alert. ← What's up, Doc? carrots→ | toxic | en |
"
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Marz (artist), you will be blocked from editing. ≈ √∞
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings." | toxic | en |
"
Speedy deletion of Image:1145998382.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:1145998382.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as ""for non-commercial use only,"" ""non-derivative use"" or ""used with permission,"" it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (talk / contribs) " | toxic | en |
Miley Cyrus reveals she's pregnant... with a pizza baby. [URL] #pizzagate | adult_sexism | en |
Tây Giang là huyện biên giới với Lào. | toxic | vi |
Since a Wikipedian in Scotland (right the far end of Britain from Leatherhead, the small Surrey market town where I live) was blocked from editing on a PC that supposedly had the same IP as I had been using when blocked (and, as far as I am aware, was from a different number series to the one that the few IPs I have had), I have been unblocked. i have decided that, with major exams coming up, i will only be an occasional Wikipedian and that the few edits I do make will be fairly major ones, mainly creating new articles. | toxic | en |
"
This is Old Gaelic. There are a few variants, but the modern spelling would be ""Cath Dhùn Neachdainn"". " | toxic | en |
"
You Need To Change Your Username Or you Will Be be Blocked
[edit] Instructions
First, take a look at the username policy to make sure the username you are requesting is appropriate. Also, please note that for technical reasons, your username cannot begin with a lowercase letter, nor can it contain any underscores.
Check to make sure the username you are requesting is not already taken. Do this by searching for the name in this list. If the name appears in the list, even if the link is red it is taken. Do not create an account under the new name. We'll do that for you.
Log in with your present username in order to place your request. Renames will not be approved if the requestee is not logged in.
Click here to place a request.
Replace the text ""CURRENT"" with your present username.
Replace ""NEW"" with the username to which you wish to be renamed.
Fill in a reason where indicated but do not add anything in the ""subject/headline"" box.
If that doesn't work, simply copy the following text to your computer's 'clipboard':
CURRENT → NEW
Reason: Reason for requested renaming.
Go to the ""Requests"" section of this page, click the ""edit"" link, and paste the text at the very bottom. Modify it as indicated above.
Make sure that you have spelled both names correctly. Save the page.
Check back periodically to answer any questions that may arise regarding your request. Do not be surprised if you suddenly cannot log in to your old account; this merely indicates that you should log in under your new name as the request has been fulfilled.
Please be patient. It may take a few days for your request to be completed.
Effects of a username change
When the rename has been completed, your account will have been renamed, and any contributions you have made (including deleted contributions) will be reattributed to your new account as a background process. Your account preferences, watchlist contents, password, etc. will all be preserved, and your user and user talk pages will have been moved to the new name.
Note: The process responsible for reallocating old contributions is currently dependent upon the job queue mechanism. As such, you may find old contributions do not immediately appear under your new account; this is perfectly normal. Updates should take at most a day to complete, although the length of time will vary according to the size of the job queue on this wiki, and the status of the server processes which process this queue.
The change will appear in the user rename log and the request will be moved to the archives in the interest of transparency. It is not possible to rename accounts without an entry being created in the log.
This change will not affect signatures you have already left on talk pages, or other places where you signed your username with . Those pages will continue to display your signature (including the link to your old username) unless edited manually.
Be aware: Once you have been renamed, your old account will no longer exist and may potentially be recreated by a third party. This is true even if your old account pages have been redirected towards your new account. To guard against impersonation, you may wish to recreate the old account yourself." | toxic | en |
Ta. Well I still think there might be some against this, I don't know if it offsets any numbering of the films, so I was hesitant to change it straight away. I don't blame anyone for questioning this, because this is the first thing I looked at when I saw the list on their website... | toxic | en |
Hmm, it has a relevance. The whole articles on the Israeli-Palestinian War is impartial on Wikipedia, with terms like just for example Palestinian Terror, Palestinans homicide bombings. Wikipedia is and will remain Zionist to the core. 188.23.191.16 | toxic | en |
Are your knickers on too tight mate? | toxic | en |
"
== Ebony article? ==
Does anyone have a citation to the 1990 Ebony article mentioned on this page? A search of issues since 1989 (in an online database) turns up nothing that matches this description, and no 1990 articles that come at all close. The reference was added by user Antares33712 at 20:19, 29 December 2005. It's possible that my search results were incomplete, but it's also possible that the author misremembered the publication or the article details.
Because the current page accuses Ebony of printing misinformation (regarding Mariah Carey's race) and also suggests that the magazine article made other questionable claims, any mistake (either an inaccurate paraphrasing of an actual Ebony article, or a misattribution of someone else's article to Ebony) could be considered harmful to the magazine, and conceivably libellous. I'm insufficiently familiar with Wikipedia's standards to take the step of removing it myself (I just added a ""fact"" tag), but I wanted to call particular attention to the question in case others deem this the sort of thing that requires expedited action. And of course, if someone does have a citation to add, or can correct any mistakes without deleting the entire reference, that would certainly be preferable!
" | toxic | en |
"Point of clarification (Possibly futile considering ...): Jenkins did not steal my idea. I made sure of that by being cryptic and esoteric in the beginning (1987). He ""misunderstood"" my idea and has perpetuated misinformation (his version of the galactic alignment) that ""you"" are assisting in spreading to the innocent and naive readers of Wikipedia. A late 1990s attempt at stopping the spread of misinformation rergarding the galactic alignment can be found here (scroll down a bit): http://www.cabiz.net/zolaric/galacticalignment.htm ... it even mentions the 13th constellation. Consider this please.
" | toxic | en |
Your GA nomination of Venues of the 2016 Winter Youth Olympics
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Venues of the 2016 Winter Youth Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. | toxic | en |
My Views on Talk:Bantva
I agree with you and am sorry for the imotional outburst. As an after-thought I am going to apologize on the talk page of Bantva. Thanks for the frank suggestion. | toxic | en |
Re: Asteroids anyone ?
>>>>> "R" == Robert Harley <harley@argote.ch> writes:
R> Another one fizzles out...
You sound disappointed. Don't worry, there will be lots more.
--
Gary Lawrence Murphy <garym@teledyn.com> TeleDynamics Communications Inc
Business Innovations Through Open Source Systems: http://www.teledyn.com
"Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."(Pablo Picasso)
http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork
| scam | en |
"
== I'm always happy to see your name on my watchlist ==
After participating in WP for over a year now, especially in the various disambiguation projects, I just wanted to say that I'm always glad to see your name pop up in any discussion. You are always courteous and your insights are always on point. I am of the opinion that people's true character is evident in their behavior, especially over time, and I feel that your contributions here are evidence of your high character as a human being. Thanks.
:P.S. If I were any good at cute little flowers and pictures, I'd give you one!
::*Much blushing* That is such a nice thing for you to say, SlackerMom - thank you so much for the truly lovely compliments! You've set me smiling for a while with that; thank you.
::Along those same lines, especially with many of the recent discussions, I am similarly glad to see your well-thought-out thoughts on disambiguation. There can be some pretty crazy ideas out there, and from what I've seen (including the thread just above this one on your talk page, which impressed me with your reasonable and rational response), you help keep things stable. It certainly is a pleasure to edit with you. And since you mentioned, it I couldn't resist something pretty and cheerful. )
:::Ahh, mutual admiration is so pleasant, is it not? Here's to a happy day! (And thanks for the butterfly!)
::::Indeed! It's always most enjoyable to work with editors who you respect.
== hans krebs ==
hello! thanks for the kind message, but i just don't agree with the premise. hk-the-general is not the primary subject, he just happens to be the first with a wikipaedia article to occupy the namespace. inasmuch as hk is a fairly common name, the hk namespace should serve as the dab page with all other hks listed with qualifiers per mos:dab#People. it was my intention to move the article on the general, but i couldn't decide whether ""hans krebs (general)"" was actually the best choice. hope this is helpful...cheers!
:Okay! I understand your reasoning now - thank you for explaining! ""Hans Krebs (general)"" seems fine - I'll go ahead and take care of the move, and of moving the disambiguation page to ""Hans Krebs"", since there is no primary topic. I'm glad to figure this out.
==DB and your invasion of one of my sandboxes==
Thank you for pointing me towards this; I feel that this suggested wording is most suitable to my case (or it will be when you get round to actually protecting the article) ""It is impossible to attempt to reach consensus on the right version while the wrong version is protected. The very credibility of Wikipedia is at stake, if the newspapers learn that Wikipedia has published the wrong version, and the page must therefore be corrected immediately, if not sooner."" I want you to know that I am deadly serious about this and will be taking it to the very top although I suspect you are a member of a central cabal so I know I will not win; you are all against me! As for invading my sandbox to make helpful changes that made links actually work, WELL!! I can only say, mustering my most ironic voice, Thank you. )
:Rouge admins?! Where?! I mean, uh...
::D
:Do you know, I never actually noticed that it was spelled ""rouge"" and not ""rogue"" until just now.
:I'm glad you enjoyed it - I always found it funny, and also a well-needed bit of humor when things get heated. As for the sandbox intrusion, it looks like you've got something good going there (I posted a bit at the Wikiproject Disambig thread about it). It looks like someone's tried to do something similar with Fraternity right now, but it also looks like there's a bit of a brouhaha going on, so I'm going to let things cool down and settle a bit before trying to sort things out. My first concern is that the page is currently tagged as a disambiguation page... but I don't think it really is one. But, will wait for things to get figure out before going in and making other changes.
:Anyways, thanks for the laugh with your post, | toxic | en |
I'm glad you weren't amused. Now straight to the point. Persianate does not just refer to arts and architecture, therefore what you did WAS vandalism, especially because the sources which support the Persianate nature of the Sultanate are not just referring to the architecture but also to the actual state court and governmental bodies (e.g. official languages). Therefore moving around Persianate and putting it at the end of the article for the sake of disguising facts IS the actual amusing part. | toxic | en |
Most cover appearances
The two individuals who appear on the most Dynamite magazine covers are John Schneider and Michael J. Fox. Each appears on four separate covers. John Schneider is known for his role in The Dukes of Hazzard. Michael J. Fox is known for his roles in Family Ties and the Back to the Future film franchise. I will incorporate this information into the article at some point. Thanks. | toxic | en |
(done spe 9, 2007 by samkusnetz) | toxic | en |
"
== escudos ==
Hey, I see you've been adding information about Escudo currency symbols. It's important to provide sources for this. In particular, I haven't been able to find sources myself for or ""E-||"" being used for Cape Verdean escudos. If you're not certain how to provide sources or references, please let me know what information you're working from and I'll try to help you out the best that I can. " | toxic | en |
My edits are personal opinion? What does that even mean? I was making my edits based on what I believe the guidelines currently say is correct. If I was wrong, I'd happily revert myself. I'm not sure what about my edits you don't feel is respectful, but you seriously need to look more closely into this guideline. ♠Dil | toxic | en |
"
Please provide additional sources. This is the English Wikipedia. Citing a single source in a foreign language is not adequate verification of an asserted fact. '''''' [ contribs ] " | toxic | en |
UT)
Jesperson was never in training to join the RCMP. I removed that, remember, eggheads, cite your scources. 01:41, 23 May 2010 ( | toxic | en |
", and NB I did not call anything ""a general truth known to all including myself"". What I said was that you and I both know there are auto parts bearing phrases like ""Meets OE specifications"". That was a bit of a guess on my part as regards your knowledge; for all I actually know, you've never set foot in an auto parts store. But since you're having this conversation, I assumed, perhaps rightly and perhaps wrongly, that you have seen such auto parts packaging. I have, but that's exactly my point: the verifiability rules of Wikipedia mean that we don't get to plug in our own knowledge as fact on the assumption that it is universal (or a ""general truth known to all"", as you put it). Assertions in articles must be backed by reference to reliable sources, no matter how sure we are of what we personally know.
" | toxic | en |
== Suggesting One Correction ==
This is basically a good article on a difficult subject. But explaining the war as an uprising of local Serbs is and letting Milošević off the hook is simply not accurate. This was an military invasion with some local support. Extremists from Serbia took part in the rebellion and they had weapons supplied by the Yugoslav National Army. The Army's immediate exploitation of these conflicts shows they were largely coordinated with the Army. Being there at the time and being an anti-fascist gives me some objectivity on this issue. I suggest the authors change that one sentence.
I was back in Croatia this summer when there was a lot of news about Gotovina, and I found an interesting dynamic from friends I talked to. Most of them could not care less about Gotovina since it is common knowledge that there were crimes committed. But many people are very reticent about joining the EU (the reason Croatia is cooperating on war crimes trials) due to the bad effect the EU has had on the economies of member countries. This is a change in public in opinion from the 1990s. When I was in a doctor's waiting room in Zagreb, a very angry discussion about EU membership broke out. And this in a country of extremely polite and reserved people. I never heard any remark about Gotovina showing a strong opinion. | toxic | en |
"
I still feel that the Adolescence article is fine in its definition of what an adolescent is, since as I stated before, adolescence doesn't just end when a person turns age 18 or age 19. Also, yes, I consider a 13-year-old a child. If you read the Child article, which I added to a week ago, you will see how the definition of Child is also defined. And, you did get a grin out of me when you just now stated that that ""a 14 year old has more similarities to a 5 year old then we do to a 40 year old mainly because we are also immature in ways""...even though I don't necessarily agree, and I don't feel that watching cartoons or any animations necessarily means immaturity. Hey, I watch Death Note. Okay, yeah, Death Note is a mature animation, but you get my point...and I get yours. I'm basically stating that a 17-year-old, for instance, in reality, is not a child...as a 7-year-old is. Yes, older people sometimes call a 17-year-old a child, but a 17-year-old is not a child. Also, when I think of adolescents, I don't usually think of 13-year-olds and 14-year-olds, though I know that they are (usually) adolescents, so...again...I get your point in calling those ages children. All in all, you are what a I believe to be a rarity; most 17-year-olds would not want to be call a children. I know I didn't. And you are one year (or is it more so months for you?) from being age 18? I'm 25, but still get mistaken for a late adolescent sometimes, and I'm not sure if it annoys or makes me me feel good that maybe when I'm 30, I can still pass for age 19. " | toxic | en |
"
Sure, thanks -) Guess that's just how seriously screwed our society is. eybaná " | toxic | en |
August 2006 (UTC)
Absolutely no idea, you seem to be unbiased in your edits. Keep up the good work. 13:29, 7 | toxic | en |
"
Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea
I note that you began this article. However, the SC of PNG is not actually a separately constituted court: like the Full Courts of the Supreme Courts the Australian States and formerly of the Supreme Courts of the Canadian Provinces (before the creation of the provincial Courts of Appeal early in the 20th century), it is an ad hoc tribunal consisting of judges of the National Court who are empanelled from time to time to hear specific appeals and references. The Chief Justice and the Registrar are ""of the Supreme and National Courts""; the puisne justices are not actually referred to as justices of the Supreme Court. This article should really be renamed ""Supreme and National Courts of Papua New Guinea"" since discussion of the work of the SC in an article of its own is somewhat artificial given that it is actually an appellate committee. I, alas, don't know how to do this. Can you manage it? " | toxic | en |
Erased rude comment an uppity editor with Autism left. | toxic | en |
Comment . As per Luke, it belongs in malpractice. The section needs rewrite also. | toxic | en |
Word of The Hour catastrophe: an event producing a subversion of the order or system of things See translations for catastrophe @ [URL] #word #translations #catastrophe #die Katastrophe #विà¤à¥à¤·à¤¿à¤à¤¾ #catastrofe #catástrofe #catástrofe | adult_sexism | en |
::The historians, as stated on those sources, signal that marriage as the point of union of the crowns. Notice also that Henry was a weak king probably manipulated on the shadow by Isabella, and so was John. Notice that the arrangements on their marriage were the arrangements used later to manage the united crowns. | toxic | en |
::It's a continuing situation, timescale is not important. | toxic | en |
or to work very often short works with short breaks | toxic | en |
"
::::: No problem at all and no, I am not Bono's daughter, and I wouldn't want to either, since I am in love with the man. D What did you think that? " | toxic | en |
::::::::::::Hey, you think it was random. I suspect it may not have been. Neither of us has sources to prove our point, so it won't go in the article. (Although something from a quality commentary could.) Neither of us started this discussion. We both expressed opinions. Different ones. That's OK. | toxic | en |
==human/ity==
Interesting tie in with regard to the second sentence in your version four sub page of the introduction. I'll think it over, it makes sense since we have humanity redirecting to the human article. At present the word does not appear in the introduction, so this appears ti have been overlooked in the bickering. | toxic | en |
::::Wikipedia:WikiProject Airlines/Destinations | toxic | en |
"
No problem. I served with what is now 1/153rd Cav RSTA, and we were the QRF for 5th Special Forces Group in OIF 1, so I ended up meeting a lot of Delta guys in my time. Also I do some 3-gun and tactical carbine shooting for a certain AR-15 manufacturer in Arizona, and I'd heard of Vickers before so I figured that he'd be notable enough for inclusion. SWATJester Denny Crane. " | toxic | en |
Ruby is not ugly bunga bunga | toxic | en |
(island)]] (later we'd better change title to Cyprus) | toxic | en |
"
:Hmmm... interesting point, but it begs the famous question; but is is art? I disagree, it's a monument more than a piece of ""art"", which it most probably was not designed to be, but I agree that a mention may help somewhat. ( )" | toxic | en |
:::Thanks for fixing that and adding information on the possible painter! Many images hosted on Wikimedia Commons are lacking dates/authors, and this often results in debates on copyright status and historical accuracy - we often simply don't have time/resources to research this. Links do expire, and I use http://web.archive.org to recover them, but this (expiration) often goes unnoticed. | toxic | en |
hpl nom change for june 9 , 2000 revision # 1
taking the texoma and the ls hpl - katy to zero effective at
4 : 00 pm today .
thanks .
tim
( see attached file : hplo 609 . xls )
- hplo 609 . xls | scam | en |
"
I'm not an editor and dont really know how this works..
..But there's a statement in this article that makes little sense:
""The resulting cartridge would have the accuracy of the former for typical combat ranges, and the firepower of the latter at short ranges.""
This literally translates to, ""has the accuracy of a rifle and the firepower of a pistol at short ranges.""
This is (i assume) not the intention of the sentence, because it's not true and it doesn't make sense...
Because a rifle round does not 'lose its power' and become a pistol round at short ranges...
...I assume its supposed to read:
""The resulting cartridge would have the accuracy AND FIREPOWER of the former for typical combat ranges, and the increase of controllability (ease of use) of the latter at short ranges.""" | toxic | en |
As I said, the article you are linking has been questioned by numerous users and the onesidedness of it's arguments is blatantly obvious, citing hardly a hand full of authors (Oh, Huntford, what a surprise= and leaving the requests by other fellow Wikipedians to back with more credible citations left unanswered for more than four months and counting. Consequently, the link you tried to implement is thoroughly contradicting with encylopedic principles so there is no other choice but revert in order to uphold the principles of neutrality and impartiality. | toxic | en |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.