Datasets:
Add full dataset card
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
-
annotations_creators:
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
language: en
|
| 4 |
license: cc-by-nc-3.0
|
| 5 |
size_categories:
|
|
@@ -8,15 +9,11 @@ task_categories:
|
|
| 8 |
- image-classification
|
| 9 |
- object-detection
|
| 10 |
task_ids: []
|
| 11 |
-
pretty_name:
|
| 12 |
tags:
|
| 13 |
- anomaly-detection
|
| 14 |
- fiftyone
|
| 15 |
- image
|
| 16 |
-
- image-classification
|
| 17 |
-
- image-classification
|
| 18 |
-
- object-detection
|
| 19 |
-
- object-detection
|
| 20 |
- power-line-inspection
|
| 21 |
- uav
|
| 22 |
description: InsPLAD is a Power Line Asset Inspection Dataset and Benchmark containing
|
|
@@ -72,13 +69,7 @@ dataset_summary: '
|
|
| 72 |
'
|
| 73 |
---
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
-
# Dataset Card for
|
| 76 |
-
|
| 77 |
-
<!-- Provide a quick summary of the dataset. -->
|
| 78 |
-
|
| 79 |
-
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
This is a [FiftyOne](https://github.com/voxel51/fiftyone) dataset with 49706 samples.
|
| 84 |
|
|
@@ -104,135 +95,235 @@ dataset = load_from_hub("harpreetsahota/InsPLAD")
|
|
| 104 |
session = fo.launch_app(dataset)
|
| 105 |
```
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
-
|
| 108 |
## Dataset Details
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
### Dataset Description
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
-
|
| 113 |
-
|
| 114 |
-
|
| 115 |
-
|
| 116 |
-
|
| 117 |
-
|
| 118 |
-
|
| 119 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 120 |
- **License:** cc-by-nc-3.0
|
| 121 |
|
| 122 |
-
### Dataset Sources
|
| 123 |
|
| 124 |
-
|
| 125 |
-
|
| 126 |
-
|
| 127 |
-
|
| 128 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 129 |
|
| 130 |
## Uses
|
| 131 |
|
| 132 |
-
<!-- Address questions around how the dataset is intended to be used. -->
|
| 133 |
-
|
| 134 |
### Direct Use
|
| 135 |
|
| 136 |
-
|
| 137 |
-
|
| 138 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 139 |
|
| 140 |
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 141 |
|
| 142 |
-
|
| 143 |
-
|
| 144 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 145 |
|
| 146 |
## Dataset Structure
|
| 147 |
|
| 148 |
-
|
| 149 |
-
|
| 150 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 151 |
|
| 152 |
## Dataset Creation
|
| 153 |
|
| 154 |
### Curation Rationale
|
| 155 |
|
| 156 |
-
|
| 157 |
-
|
| 158 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 159 |
|
| 160 |
### Source Data
|
| 161 |
|
| 162 |
-
<!-- This section describes the source data (e.g. news text and headlines, social media posts, translated sentences, ...). -->
|
| 163 |
-
|
| 164 |
#### Data Collection and Processing
|
| 165 |
|
| 166 |
-
|
| 167 |
-
|
| 168 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 169 |
|
| 170 |
#### Who are the source data producers?
|
| 171 |
|
| 172 |
-
|
| 173 |
-
|
| 174 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 175 |
|
| 176 |
-
### Annotations
|
| 177 |
-
|
| 178 |
-
<!-- If the dataset contains annotations which are not part of the initial data collection, use this section to describe them. -->
|
| 179 |
|
| 180 |
#### Annotation process
|
| 181 |
|
| 182 |
-
|
| 183 |
-
|
| 184 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 185 |
|
| 186 |
#### Who are the annotators?
|
| 187 |
|
| 188 |
-
|
| 189 |
-
|
| 190 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 191 |
|
| 192 |
#### Personal and Sensitive Information
|
| 193 |
|
| 194 |
-
|
| 195 |
-
|
| 196 |
-
|
| 197 |
-
|
| 198 |
-
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 199 |
-
|
| 200 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
|
| 201 |
-
|
| 202 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 203 |
|
| 204 |
-
##
|
| 205 |
-
|
| 206 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
|
| 207 |
-
|
| 208 |
-
Users should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the dataset. More information needed for further recommendations.
|
| 209 |
-
|
| 210 |
-
## Citation [optional]
|
| 211 |
-
|
| 212 |
-
<!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the dataset, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
|
| 213 |
|
| 214 |
**BibTeX:**
|
| 215 |
|
| 216 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 217 |
|
| 218 |
**APA:**
|
| 219 |
|
| 220 |
-
|
| 221 |
-
|
| 222 |
-
## Glossary [optional]
|
| 223 |
-
|
| 224 |
-
<!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the dataset or dataset card. -->
|
| 225 |
-
|
| 226 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 227 |
|
| 228 |
-
## More Information
|
| 229 |
|
| 230 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 231 |
|
| 232 |
-
## Dataset Card Authors
|
| 233 |
|
| 234 |
-
|
| 235 |
|
| 236 |
## Dataset Card Contact
|
| 237 |
|
| 238 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
+
annotations_creators:
|
| 3 |
+
- expert-generated
|
| 4 |
language: en
|
| 5 |
license: cc-by-nc-3.0
|
| 6 |
size_categories:
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
- image-classification
|
| 10 |
- object-detection
|
| 11 |
task_ids: []
|
| 12 |
+
pretty_name: InsPLAD
|
| 13 |
tags:
|
| 14 |
- anomaly-detection
|
| 15 |
- fiftyone
|
| 16 |
- image
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
- power-line-inspection
|
| 18 |
- uav
|
| 19 |
description: InsPLAD is a Power Line Asset Inspection Dataset and Benchmark containing
|
|
|
|
| 69 |
'
|
| 70 |
---
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
+
# Dataset Card for InsPLAD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
This is a [FiftyOne](https://github.com/voxel51/fiftyone) dataset with 49706 samples.
|
| 75 |
|
|
|
|
| 95 |
session = fo.launch_app(dataset)
|
| 96 |
```
|
| 97 |
|
|
|
|
| 98 |
## Dataset Details
|
| 99 |
|
| 100 |
### Dataset Description
|
| 101 |
|
| 102 |
+
InsPLAD (Inspection of Power Line Assets Dataset) is a Power Line Asset
|
| 103 |
+
Inspection Dataset and Benchmark built from 10,561 high-resolution UAV
|
| 104 |
+
images of real, operating power lines. It covers the three tasks of a
|
| 105 |
+
typical power line visual inspection pipeline: (1) object detection of 17
|
| 106 |
+
unique power line asset categories in full UAV frames (InsPLAD-det), (2)
|
| 107 |
+
supervised classification of visible defects on cropped asset images for 5
|
| 108 |
+
asset categories, and (3) unsupervised anomaly detection (normal vs.
|
| 109 |
+
anomalous) on cropped asset images for all 17 asset categories. This
|
| 110 |
+
FiftyOne build merges all three official sub-datasets into a single
|
| 111 |
+
dataset, distinguished by a `task` field and per-task saved views.
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
+
- **Curated by:** André Luiz Vieira-e-Silva, Heitor Felix, Francisco
|
| 114 |
+
Simões, Veronica Teichrieb (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco / Centro
|
| 115 |
+
de Informática; Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco)
|
| 116 |
+
- **Funded by:** Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível
|
| 117 |
+
Superior (CAPES), Brazil; National Council for Scientific and
|
| 118 |
+
Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil
|
| 119 |
+
- **Shared by:** The original authors, via GitHub and Mendeley Data
|
| 120 |
+
- **Language(s):** en (asset/defect class names; not an NLP dataset)
|
| 121 |
- **License:** cc-by-nc-3.0
|
| 122 |
|
| 123 |
+
### Dataset Sources
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
+
- **Repository:** https://github.com/andreluizbvs/InsPLAD
|
| 126 |
+
- **Paper:** InsPLAD: A Dataset and Benchmark for Power Line Asset
|
| 127 |
+
Inspection in UAV Images, International Journal of Remote Sensing (2023),
|
| 128 |
+
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01619. A companion paper using the same data,
|
| 129 |
+
Attention Modules Improve Image-Level Anomaly Detection for Industrial
|
| 130 |
+
Inspection: A DifferNet Case Study, WACV 2024,
|
| 131 |
+
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02747
|
| 132 |
+
- **Original data download:** https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/5n3fjgvfyz/1
|
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
## Uses
|
| 135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 136 |
### Direct Use
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 |
+
Training and benchmarking object detectors on power line hardware
|
| 139 |
+
categories; training and benchmarking supervised defect classifiers on
|
| 140 |
+
cropped asset images; training and benchmarking unsupervised anomaly
|
| 141 |
+
detection methods on cropped asset images; research into rare-class data
|
| 142 |
+
curation and annotation-efficient workflows (the class distribution is
|
| 143 |
+
heavily long-tailed, from 3,169 images down to 56 for the rarest raw
|
| 144 |
+
category).
|
| 145 |
|
| 146 |
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 147 |
|
| 148 |
+
Any commercial use — the source license (CC BY-NC 3.0) is non-commercial
|
| 149 |
+
only. The dataset is not intended or suitable for identifying individuals;
|
| 150 |
+
it contains no personal or sensitive data by design (aerial images of
|
| 151 |
+
power line hardware only). Asset appearance reflects a specific utility
|
| 152 |
+
company's hardware standards in Brazil and may not generalize to power
|
| 153 |
+
line hardware from other manufacturers, regions, or voltage classes
|
| 154 |
+
without further validation.
|
| 155 |
|
| 156 |
## Dataset Structure
|
| 157 |
|
| 158 |
+
This is a flat image dataset (`media_type = "image"`), not grouped or
|
| 159 |
+
video, with **49,706 samples** total, combining InsPLAD's three official
|
| 160 |
+
sub-datasets into one FiftyOne dataset via a `task` field. Three saved
|
| 161 |
+
views are provided, one per sub-task: `InsPLAD-det` (10,561 samples),
|
| 162 |
+
`InsPLAD-fault-supervised` (11,525 samples), `InsPLAD-anomaly` (27,620
|
| 163 |
+
samples).
|
| 164 |
+
|
| 165 |
+
### Fields
|
| 166 |
+
|
| 167 |
+
| Field | FiftyOne type | Description |
|
| 168 |
+
|-------|---------------|-------------|
|
| 169 |
+
| `task` | `StringField` | Which sub-dataset this sample belongs to: `detection`, `fault_classification`, or `anomaly_detection` |
|
| 170 |
+
| `ground_truth` | `Detections` | Bounding boxes over 18 raw power line asset categories (InsPLAD-det COCO annotations, converted to relative `[x, y, w, h]`); populated only for `task == "detection"` |
|
| 171 |
+
| `asset` | `StringField` | Power line asset category of the cropped image (5 distinct values for `fault_classification`, 17 for `anomaly_detection`); not populated for `detection` samples |
|
| 172 |
+
| `fault` | `Classification` | Supervised fault-classification label: `good`, `rust`, `missing_cap`, or `bird_nest`; populated only for `task == "fault_classification"` |
|
| 173 |
+
| `anomaly` | `Classification` | Binary label: `normal` or `anomaly`; populated only for `task == "anomaly_detection"` |
|
| 174 |
+
| `defect` | `StringField` | Specific defect subtype for anomaly-detection samples: `none`, `rust`, `missing_cap`, `bird_nest`, `torn`, or `peeling_paint`; populated only for `task == "anomaly_detection"` |
|
| 175 |
+
| `tags` | list of `str` | Encodes both the sub-dataset (`det`, `fault`, or `anomaly`) and the original split (`train`, `val`, or `test`) |
|
| 176 |
+
|
| 177 |
+
### Label types and why
|
| 178 |
+
|
| 179 |
+
- `ground_truth` uses `Detections` because InsPLAD-det's source annotations
|
| 180 |
+
are 2D bounding boxes (no segmentation masks, despite the COCO schema
|
| 181 |
+
having a `segmentation` field — it is always empty in the source data).
|
| 182 |
+
- `fault` and `anomaly` use `Classification` (not `Classifications`)
|
| 183 |
+
because each cropped image in these sub-datasets carries exactly one
|
| 184 |
+
label, encoded by its containing folder in the source data.
|
| 185 |
+
- `defect` is stored as a plain string field, separate from the `anomaly`
|
| 186 |
+
Classification, so the specific defect subtype can be filtered/faceted
|
| 187 |
+
independently of the binary normal/anomaly label.
|
| 188 |
+
|
| 189 |
+
### `dataset.info`
|
| 190 |
+
|
| 191 |
+
`dataset.info` records `source` (the GitHub repository URL), `paper` (the
|
| 192 |
+
arXiv URL), and `license` (`CC BY-NC 3.0`).
|
| 193 |
+
|
| 194 |
+
### Parsing decisions
|
| 195 |
+
|
| 196 |
+
- **Duplicate COCO entries merged.** InsPLAD-det's `instances_train.json`
|
| 197 |
+
contains 46 `file_name`s that appear under two different `image_id`s,
|
| 198 |
+
each holding a disjoint subset of that image's boxes. These were merged
|
| 199 |
+
into one sample per file with the union of both `image_id`s' detections.
|
| 200 |
+
As a result, the true unique image count for InsPLAD-det is **10,561**,
|
| 201 |
+
not the 10,607 implied by the paper's headline image count.
|
| 202 |
+
- **Bounding box conversion.** Source boxes are absolute-pixel COCO
|
| 203 |
+
`[x, y, w, h]`; converted to FiftyOne's relative `[0, 1]` `[x, y, w, h]`
|
| 204 |
+
by dividing by each image's width/height.
|
| 205 |
+
- **`sphere` category kept as-is.** InsPLAD-det's COCO `categories` list
|
| 206 |
+
includes an 18th category, `sphere` (26 boxes, train split only), which
|
| 207 |
+
is not one of the paper's 17 named asset categories or its per-class
|
| 208 |
+
benchmark table. It is retained in `ground_truth` rather than dropped,
|
| 209 |
+
since the source data includes it.
|
| 210 |
+
- **Fault-classification label vocabulary normalized.** In the source
|
| 211 |
+
data, `supervised_fault_classification`'s `polymer-insulator-upper-shackle`
|
| 212 |
+
asset used Portuguese folder names in its `train` split (`corrosão`,
|
| 213 |
+
`normal`) but English folder names in `val` (`rust`, `good`) for the
|
| 214 |
+
same two conditions. Both were mapped to `rust`/`good` for consistency
|
| 215 |
+
with the other four fault-classification asset categories.
|
| 216 |
+
- **Minor spelling normalized across sub-datasets.** The same defect
|
| 217 |
+
concept was spelled differently between the supervised and unsupervised
|
| 218 |
+
sub-datasets in the source data (`missing-cap` vs. `missingcap`;
|
| 219 |
+
`bird-nest` vs. `nest`). Both were normalized to `missing_cap` and
|
| 220 |
+
`bird_nest` respectively across both `fault` and `defect` fields.
|
| 221 |
+
- **`defect` uses `"none"` for normal anomaly-detection samples**, rather
|
| 222 |
+
than leaving the field unset, for consistent filtering/faceting.
|
| 223 |
|
| 224 |
## Dataset Creation
|
| 225 |
|
| 226 |
### Curation Rationale
|
| 227 |
|
| 228 |
+
Automated visual inspection of power line assets is an active research
|
| 229 |
+
area, but most power line inspection datasets are proprietary, undisclosed
|
| 230 |
+
by the utility companies and agencies that hold them. InsPLAD was created
|
| 231 |
+
to provide the first large, real-world, publicly available dataset and
|
| 232 |
+
benchmark covering all three stages of a typical inspection pipeline —
|
| 233 |
+
asset detection, defect classification, and anomaly detection — on the
|
| 234 |
+
same underlying asset categories.
|
| 235 |
|
| 236 |
### Source Data
|
| 237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 238 |
#### Data Collection and Processing
|
| 239 |
|
| 240 |
+
Images were captured by UAV (drone) during real-world inspections of
|
| 241 |
+
operating power lines, at 1920×1080 resolution, under varied environmental
|
| 242 |
+
conditions, orientations, and distances. `InsPLAD-fault`'s two sub-datasets
|
| 243 |
+
(`supervised_fault_classification` and `unsupervised_anomaly_detection`)
|
| 244 |
+
were derived from InsPLAD-det: annotated objects for five (supervised) and
|
| 245 |
+
seventeen (anomaly detection) asset categories were cropped to a
|
| 246 |
+
near-square proportion and labeled at the image level according to visible
|
| 247 |
+
condition (normal, or the specific defect present). For supervised fault
|
| 248 |
+
classification, faulty training samples were augmented roughly 10x using
|
| 249 |
+
the Albumentations library to balance otherwise rare defect classes; for
|
| 250 |
+
unsupervised anomaly detection, defective examples were deliberately
|
| 251 |
+
withheld from training and included only in the test split, consistent
|
| 252 |
+
with the unsupervised anomaly detection setting.
|
| 253 |
|
| 254 |
#### Who are the source data producers?
|
| 255 |
|
| 256 |
+
UAV inspection imagery of real, operating power lines, collected by the
|
| 257 |
+
Voxar Labs group at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.
|
|
|
|
| 258 |
|
| 259 |
+
### Annotations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 260 |
|
| 261 |
#### Annotation process
|
| 262 |
|
| 263 |
+
Bounding boxes for InsPLAD-det were drawn using the LabelImg tool by two
|
| 264 |
+
annotators, instructed by specialists on asset naming conventions and the
|
| 265 |
+
regions of interest that should be contained in each box, with annotators
|
| 266 |
+
in constant contact to standardize labeling. Fault and anomaly labels were
|
| 267 |
+
applied at the image level based on the visible condition of each cropped
|
| 268 |
+
asset.
|
| 269 |
|
| 270 |
#### Who are the annotators?
|
| 271 |
|
| 272 |
+
Two human annotators, instructed and guided by domain specialists, per the
|
| 273 |
+
source paper.
|
|
|
|
| 274 |
|
| 275 |
#### Personal and Sensitive Information
|
| 276 |
|
| 277 |
+
Not addressed explicitly in the source paper. Images are aerial captures
|
| 278 |
+
of power line hardware and surrounding infrastructure; there is no
|
| 279 |
+
statement in the source material regarding incidental capture of people or
|
| 280 |
+
other personal data. `[More Information Needed]`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 281 |
|
| 282 |
+
## Citation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 283 |
|
| 284 |
**BibTeX:**
|
| 285 |
|
| 286 |
+
```
|
| 287 |
+
@article{doi:10.1080/01431161.2023.2283900,
|
| 288 |
+
author = {André Luiz Buarque Vieira e Silva, Heitor de Castro Felix, Franscisco Paulo Magalhães Simões, Veronica Teichrieb, Michel dos Santos, Hemir Santiago, Virginia Sgotti and Henrique Lott Neto},
|
| 289 |
+
title = {InsPLAD: A Dataset and Benchmark for Power Line Asset Inspection in UAV Images},
|
| 290 |
+
journal = {International Journal of Remote Sensing},
|
| 291 |
+
volume = {44},
|
| 292 |
+
number = {23},
|
| 293 |
+
pages = {1-27},
|
| 294 |
+
year = {2023},
|
| 295 |
+
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
|
| 296 |
+
doi = {10.1080/01431161.2023.2283900},
|
| 297 |
+
URL = {https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2023.2283900},
|
| 298 |
+
eprint = {https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2023.2283900},
|
| 299 |
+
}
|
| 300 |
+
|
| 301 |
+
@InProceedings{Vieira_2024_WACV,
|
| 302 |
+
author = {e Silva, Andr\'e Luiz Vieira and Sim\~oes, Francisco and Kowerko, Danny and Schlosser, Tobias and Battisti, Felipe and Teichrieb, Veronica},
|
| 303 |
+
title = {Attention Modules Improve Image-Level Anomaly Detection for Industrial Inspection: A DifferNet Case Study},
|
| 304 |
+
booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)},
|
| 305 |
+
month = {January},
|
| 306 |
+
year = {2024},
|
| 307 |
+
pages = {8246-8255}
|
| 308 |
+
}
|
| 309 |
+
```
|
| 310 |
|
| 311 |
**APA:**
|
| 312 |
|
| 313 |
+
Vieira-e-Silva, A. L. B., de Castro Felix, H., Simões, F. P. M., Teichrieb, V., dos Santos, M., Santiago, H., Sgotti, V., & Lott Neto, H. (2023). InsPLAD: A Dataset and Benchmark for Power Line Asset Inspection in UAV Images. *International Journal of Remote Sensing*, 44(23), 1-27.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 314 |
|
| 315 |
+
## More Information
|
| 316 |
|
| 317 |
+
This FiftyOne build merges the three official InsPLAD sub-datasets
|
| 318 |
+
(`InsPLAD-det.zip`, `supervised_fault_classification.zip`,
|
| 319 |
+
`unsupervised_anomaly_detection.zip`) into one dataset. See the source
|
| 320 |
+
repository (https://github.com/andreluizbvs/InsPLAD) for the original,
|
| 321 |
+
separately-distributed sub-datasets and additional documentation.
|
| 322 |
|
| 323 |
+
## Dataset Card Authors
|
| 324 |
|
| 325 |
+
Harpreet Sahota (FiftyOne / Voxel51 conversion and card)
|
| 326 |
|
| 327 |
## Dataset Card Contact
|
| 328 |
|
| 329 |
+
harpreetsahota
|