harpreetsahota commited on
Commit
1478aea
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 22bc1d9

Add full dataset card

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +181 -90
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
1
  ---
2
- annotations_creators: []
 
3
  language: en
4
  license: cc-by-nc-3.0
5
  size_categories:
@@ -8,15 +9,11 @@ task_categories:
8
  - image-classification
9
  - object-detection
10
  task_ids: []
11
- pretty_name: insplad
12
  tags:
13
  - anomaly-detection
14
  - fiftyone
15
  - image
16
- - image-classification
17
- - image-classification
18
- - object-detection
19
- - object-detection
20
  - power-line-inspection
21
  - uav
22
  description: InsPLAD is a Power Line Asset Inspection Dataset and Benchmark containing
@@ -72,13 +69,7 @@ dataset_summary: '
72
  '
73
  ---
74
 
75
- # Dataset Card for insplad
76
-
77
- <!-- Provide a quick summary of the dataset. -->
78
-
79
-
80
-
81
-
82
 
83
  This is a [FiftyOne](https://github.com/voxel51/fiftyone) dataset with 49706 samples.
84
 
@@ -104,135 +95,235 @@ dataset = load_from_hub("harpreetsahota/InsPLAD")
104
  session = fo.launch_app(dataset)
105
  ```
106
 
107
-
108
  ## Dataset Details
109
 
110
  ### Dataset Description
111
 
112
- <!-- Provide a longer summary of what this dataset is. -->
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
- - **Curated by:** [More Information Needed]
117
- - **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
118
- - **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
119
- - **Language(s) (NLP):** en
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
120
  - **License:** cc-by-nc-3.0
121
 
122
- ### Dataset Sources [optional]
123
 
124
- <!-- Provide the basic links for the dataset. -->
125
-
126
- - **Repository:** [More Information Needed]
127
- - **Paper [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
128
- - **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
129
 
130
  ## Uses
131
 
132
- <!-- Address questions around how the dataset is intended to be used. -->
133
-
134
  ### Direct Use
135
 
136
- <!-- This section describes suitable use cases for the dataset. -->
137
-
138
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
139
 
140
  ### Out-of-Scope Use
141
 
142
- <!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the dataset will not work well for. -->
143
-
144
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
145
 
146
  ## Dataset Structure
147
 
148
- <!-- This section provides a description of the dataset fields, and additional information about the dataset structure such as criteria used to create the splits, relationships between data points, etc. -->
149
-
150
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
151
 
152
  ## Dataset Creation
153
 
154
  ### Curation Rationale
155
 
156
- <!-- Motivation for the creation of this dataset. -->
157
-
158
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
159
 
160
  ### Source Data
161
 
162
- <!-- This section describes the source data (e.g. news text and headlines, social media posts, translated sentences, ...). -->
163
-
164
  #### Data Collection and Processing
165
 
166
- <!-- This section describes the data collection and processing process such as data selection criteria, filtering and normalization methods, tools and libraries used, etc. -->
167
-
168
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
169
 
170
  #### Who are the source data producers?
171
 
172
- <!-- This section describes the people or systems who originally created the data. It should also include self-reported demographic or identity information for the source data creators if this information is available. -->
173
-
174
- [More Information Needed]
175
 
176
- ### Annotations [optional]
177
-
178
- <!-- If the dataset contains annotations which are not part of the initial data collection, use this section to describe them. -->
179
 
180
  #### Annotation process
181
 
182
- <!-- This section describes the annotation process such as annotation tools used in the process, the amount of data annotated, annotation guidelines provided to the annotators, interannotator statistics, annotation validation, etc. -->
183
-
184
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
185
 
186
  #### Who are the annotators?
187
 
188
- <!-- This section describes the people or systems who created the annotations. -->
189
-
190
- [More Information Needed]
191
 
192
  #### Personal and Sensitive Information
193
 
194
- <!-- State whether the dataset contains data that might be considered personal, sensitive, or private (e.g., data that reveals addresses, uniquely identifiable names or aliases, racial or ethnic origins, sexual orientations, religious beliefs, political opinions, financial or health data, etc.). If efforts were made to anonymize the data, describe the anonymization process. -->
195
-
196
- [More Information Needed]
197
-
198
- ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
199
-
200
- <!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
201
-
202
- [More Information Needed]
203
 
204
- ### Recommendations
205
-
206
- <!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
207
-
208
- Users should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the dataset. More information needed for further recommendations.
209
-
210
- ## Citation [optional]
211
-
212
- <!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the dataset, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
213
 
214
  **BibTeX:**
215
 
216
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
217
 
218
  **APA:**
219
 
220
- [More Information Needed]
221
-
222
- ## Glossary [optional]
223
-
224
- <!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the dataset or dataset card. -->
225
-
226
- [More Information Needed]
227
 
228
- ## More Information [optional]
229
 
230
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
231
 
232
- ## Dataset Card Authors [optional]
233
 
234
- [More Information Needed]
235
 
236
  ## Dataset Card Contact
237
 
238
- [More Information Needed]
 
1
  ---
2
+ annotations_creators:
3
+ - expert-generated
4
  language: en
5
  license: cc-by-nc-3.0
6
  size_categories:
 
9
  - image-classification
10
  - object-detection
11
  task_ids: []
12
+ pretty_name: InsPLAD
13
  tags:
14
  - anomaly-detection
15
  - fiftyone
16
  - image
 
 
 
 
17
  - power-line-inspection
18
  - uav
19
  description: InsPLAD is a Power Line Asset Inspection Dataset and Benchmark containing
 
69
  '
70
  ---
71
 
72
+ # Dataset Card for InsPLAD
 
 
 
 
 
 
73
 
74
  This is a [FiftyOne](https://github.com/voxel51/fiftyone) dataset with 49706 samples.
75
 
 
95
  session = fo.launch_app(dataset)
96
  ```
97
 
 
98
  ## Dataset Details
99
 
100
  ### Dataset Description
101
 
102
+ InsPLAD (Inspection of Power Line Assets Dataset) is a Power Line Asset
103
+ Inspection Dataset and Benchmark built from 10,561 high-resolution UAV
104
+ images of real, operating power lines. It covers the three tasks of a
105
+ typical power line visual inspection pipeline: (1) object detection of 17
106
+ unique power line asset categories in full UAV frames (InsPLAD-det), (2)
107
+ supervised classification of visible defects on cropped asset images for 5
108
+ asset categories, and (3) unsupervised anomaly detection (normal vs.
109
+ anomalous) on cropped asset images for all 17 asset categories. This
110
+ FiftyOne build merges all three official sub-datasets into a single
111
+ dataset, distinguished by a `task` field and per-task saved views.
112
+
113
+ - **Curated by:** André Luiz Vieira-e-Silva, Heitor Felix, Francisco
114
+ Simões, Veronica Teichrieb (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco / Centro
115
+ de Informática; Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco)
116
+ - **Funded by:** Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível
117
+ Superior (CAPES), Brazil; National Council for Scientific and
118
+ Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil
119
+ - **Shared by:** The original authors, via GitHub and Mendeley Data
120
+ - **Language(s):** en (asset/defect class names; not an NLP dataset)
121
  - **License:** cc-by-nc-3.0
122
 
123
+ ### Dataset Sources
124
 
125
+ - **Repository:** https://github.com/andreluizbvs/InsPLAD
126
+ - **Paper:** InsPLAD: A Dataset and Benchmark for Power Line Asset
127
+ Inspection in UAV Images, International Journal of Remote Sensing (2023),
128
+ https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01619. A companion paper using the same data,
129
+ Attention Modules Improve Image-Level Anomaly Detection for Industrial
130
+ Inspection: A DifferNet Case Study, WACV 2024,
131
+ https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02747
132
+ - **Original data download:** https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/5n3fjgvfyz/1
133
 
134
  ## Uses
135
 
 
 
136
  ### Direct Use
137
 
138
+ Training and benchmarking object detectors on power line hardware
139
+ categories; training and benchmarking supervised defect classifiers on
140
+ cropped asset images; training and benchmarking unsupervised anomaly
141
+ detection methods on cropped asset images; research into rare-class data
142
+ curation and annotation-efficient workflows (the class distribution is
143
+ heavily long-tailed, from 3,169 images down to 56 for the rarest raw
144
+ category).
145
 
146
  ### Out-of-Scope Use
147
 
148
+ Any commercial use the source license (CC BY-NC 3.0) is non-commercial
149
+ only. The dataset is not intended or suitable for identifying individuals;
150
+ it contains no personal or sensitive data by design (aerial images of
151
+ power line hardware only). Asset appearance reflects a specific utility
152
+ company's hardware standards in Brazil and may not generalize to power
153
+ line hardware from other manufacturers, regions, or voltage classes
154
+ without further validation.
155
 
156
  ## Dataset Structure
157
 
158
+ This is a flat image dataset (`media_type = "image"`), not grouped or
159
+ video, with **49,706 samples** total, combining InsPLAD's three official
160
+ sub-datasets into one FiftyOne dataset via a `task` field. Three saved
161
+ views are provided, one per sub-task: `InsPLAD-det` (10,561 samples),
162
+ `InsPLAD-fault-supervised` (11,525 samples), `InsPLAD-anomaly` (27,620
163
+ samples).
164
+
165
+ ### Fields
166
+
167
+ | Field | FiftyOne type | Description |
168
+ |-------|---------------|-------------|
169
+ | `task` | `StringField` | Which sub-dataset this sample belongs to: `detection`, `fault_classification`, or `anomaly_detection` |
170
+ | `ground_truth` | `Detections` | Bounding boxes over 18 raw power line asset categories (InsPLAD-det COCO annotations, converted to relative `[x, y, w, h]`); populated only for `task == "detection"` |
171
+ | `asset` | `StringField` | Power line asset category of the cropped image (5 distinct values for `fault_classification`, 17 for `anomaly_detection`); not populated for `detection` samples |
172
+ | `fault` | `Classification` | Supervised fault-classification label: `good`, `rust`, `missing_cap`, or `bird_nest`; populated only for `task == "fault_classification"` |
173
+ | `anomaly` | `Classification` | Binary label: `normal` or `anomaly`; populated only for `task == "anomaly_detection"` |
174
+ | `defect` | `StringField` | Specific defect subtype for anomaly-detection samples: `none`, `rust`, `missing_cap`, `bird_nest`, `torn`, or `peeling_paint`; populated only for `task == "anomaly_detection"` |
175
+ | `tags` | list of `str` | Encodes both the sub-dataset (`det`, `fault`, or `anomaly`) and the original split (`train`, `val`, or `test`) |
176
+
177
+ ### Label types and why
178
+
179
+ - `ground_truth` uses `Detections` because InsPLAD-det's source annotations
180
+ are 2D bounding boxes (no segmentation masks, despite the COCO schema
181
+ having a `segmentation` field — it is always empty in the source data).
182
+ - `fault` and `anomaly` use `Classification` (not `Classifications`)
183
+ because each cropped image in these sub-datasets carries exactly one
184
+ label, encoded by its containing folder in the source data.
185
+ - `defect` is stored as a plain string field, separate from the `anomaly`
186
+ Classification, so the specific defect subtype can be filtered/faceted
187
+ independently of the binary normal/anomaly label.
188
+
189
+ ### `dataset.info`
190
+
191
+ `dataset.info` records `source` (the GitHub repository URL), `paper` (the
192
+ arXiv URL), and `license` (`CC BY-NC 3.0`).
193
+
194
+ ### Parsing decisions
195
+
196
+ - **Duplicate COCO entries merged.** InsPLAD-det's `instances_train.json`
197
+ contains 46 `file_name`s that appear under two different `image_id`s,
198
+ each holding a disjoint subset of that image's boxes. These were merged
199
+ into one sample per file with the union of both `image_id`s' detections.
200
+ As a result, the true unique image count for InsPLAD-det is **10,561**,
201
+ not the 10,607 implied by the paper's headline image count.
202
+ - **Bounding box conversion.** Source boxes are absolute-pixel COCO
203
+ `[x, y, w, h]`; converted to FiftyOne's relative `[0, 1]` `[x, y, w, h]`
204
+ by dividing by each image's width/height.
205
+ - **`sphere` category kept as-is.** InsPLAD-det's COCO `categories` list
206
+ includes an 18th category, `sphere` (26 boxes, train split only), which
207
+ is not one of the paper's 17 named asset categories or its per-class
208
+ benchmark table. It is retained in `ground_truth` rather than dropped,
209
+ since the source data includes it.
210
+ - **Fault-classification label vocabulary normalized.** In the source
211
+ data, `supervised_fault_classification`'s `polymer-insulator-upper-shackle`
212
+ asset used Portuguese folder names in its `train` split (`corrosão`,
213
+ `normal`) but English folder names in `val` (`rust`, `good`) for the
214
+ same two conditions. Both were mapped to `rust`/`good` for consistency
215
+ with the other four fault-classification asset categories.
216
+ - **Minor spelling normalized across sub-datasets.** The same defect
217
+ concept was spelled differently between the supervised and unsupervised
218
+ sub-datasets in the source data (`missing-cap` vs. `missingcap`;
219
+ `bird-nest` vs. `nest`). Both were normalized to `missing_cap` and
220
+ `bird_nest` respectively across both `fault` and `defect` fields.
221
+ - **`defect` uses `"none"` for normal anomaly-detection samples**, rather
222
+ than leaving the field unset, for consistent filtering/faceting.
223
 
224
  ## Dataset Creation
225
 
226
  ### Curation Rationale
227
 
228
+ Automated visual inspection of power line assets is an active research
229
+ area, but most power line inspection datasets are proprietary, undisclosed
230
+ by the utility companies and agencies that hold them. InsPLAD was created
231
+ to provide the first large, real-world, publicly available dataset and
232
+ benchmark covering all three stages of a typical inspection pipeline —
233
+ asset detection, defect classification, and anomaly detection — on the
234
+ same underlying asset categories.
235
 
236
  ### Source Data
237
 
 
 
238
  #### Data Collection and Processing
239
 
240
+ Images were captured by UAV (drone) during real-world inspections of
241
+ operating power lines, at 1920×1080 resolution, under varied environmental
242
+ conditions, orientations, and distances. `InsPLAD-fault`'s two sub-datasets
243
+ (`supervised_fault_classification` and `unsupervised_anomaly_detection`)
244
+ were derived from InsPLAD-det: annotated objects for five (supervised) and
245
+ seventeen (anomaly detection) asset categories were cropped to a
246
+ near-square proportion and labeled at the image level according to visible
247
+ condition (normal, or the specific defect present). For supervised fault
248
+ classification, faulty training samples were augmented roughly 10x using
249
+ the Albumentations library to balance otherwise rare defect classes; for
250
+ unsupervised anomaly detection, defective examples were deliberately
251
+ withheld from training and included only in the test split, consistent
252
+ with the unsupervised anomaly detection setting.
253
 
254
  #### Who are the source data producers?
255
 
256
+ UAV inspection imagery of real, operating power lines, collected by the
257
+ Voxar Labs group at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.
 
258
 
259
+ ### Annotations
 
 
260
 
261
  #### Annotation process
262
 
263
+ Bounding boxes for InsPLAD-det were drawn using the LabelImg tool by two
264
+ annotators, instructed by specialists on asset naming conventions and the
265
+ regions of interest that should be contained in each box, with annotators
266
+ in constant contact to standardize labeling. Fault and anomaly labels were
267
+ applied at the image level based on the visible condition of each cropped
268
+ asset.
269
 
270
  #### Who are the annotators?
271
 
272
+ Two human annotators, instructed and guided by domain specialists, per the
273
+ source paper.
 
274
 
275
  #### Personal and Sensitive Information
276
 
277
+ Not addressed explicitly in the source paper. Images are aerial captures
278
+ of power line hardware and surrounding infrastructure; there is no
279
+ statement in the source material regarding incidental capture of people or
280
+ other personal data. `[More Information Needed]`
 
 
 
 
 
281
 
282
+ ## Citation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
283
 
284
  **BibTeX:**
285
 
286
+ ```
287
+ @article{doi:10.1080/01431161.2023.2283900,
288
+ author = {André Luiz Buarque Vieira e Silva, Heitor de Castro Felix, Franscisco Paulo Magalhães Simões, Veronica Teichrieb, Michel dos Santos, Hemir Santiago, Virginia Sgotti and Henrique Lott Neto},
289
+ title = {InsPLAD: A Dataset and Benchmark for Power Line Asset Inspection in UAV Images},
290
+ journal = {International Journal of Remote Sensing},
291
+ volume = {44},
292
+ number = {23},
293
+ pages = {1-27},
294
+ year = {2023},
295
+ publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
296
+ doi = {10.1080/01431161.2023.2283900},
297
+ URL = {https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2023.2283900},
298
+ eprint = {https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2023.2283900},
299
+ }
300
+
301
+ @InProceedings{Vieira_2024_WACV,
302
+ author = {e Silva, Andr\'e Luiz Vieira and Sim\~oes, Francisco and Kowerko, Danny and Schlosser, Tobias and Battisti, Felipe and Teichrieb, Veronica},
303
+ title = {Attention Modules Improve Image-Level Anomaly Detection for Industrial Inspection: A DifferNet Case Study},
304
+ booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)},
305
+ month = {January},
306
+ year = {2024},
307
+ pages = {8246-8255}
308
+ }
309
+ ```
310
 
311
  **APA:**
312
 
313
+ Vieira-e-Silva, A. L. B., de Castro Felix, H., Simões, F. P. M., Teichrieb, V., dos Santos, M., Santiago, H., Sgotti, V., & Lott Neto, H. (2023). InsPLAD: A Dataset and Benchmark for Power Line Asset Inspection in UAV Images. *International Journal of Remote Sensing*, 44(23), 1-27.
 
 
 
 
 
 
314
 
315
+ ## More Information
316
 
317
+ This FiftyOne build merges the three official InsPLAD sub-datasets
318
+ (`InsPLAD-det.zip`, `supervised_fault_classification.zip`,
319
+ `unsupervised_anomaly_detection.zip`) into one dataset. See the source
320
+ repository (https://github.com/andreluizbvs/InsPLAD) for the original,
321
+ separately-distributed sub-datasets and additional documentation.
322
 
323
+ ## Dataset Card Authors
324
 
325
+ Harpreet Sahota (FiftyOne / Voxel51 conversion and card)
326
 
327
  ## Dataset Card Contact
328
 
329
+ harpreetsahota