File size: 75,993 Bytes
6fa4bc9 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 | {
"paper_id": "P81-1015",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T09:15:08.732945Z"
},
"title": "Analo~es in Spontaneous Discourse I",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Rachel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Relc",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Harvard University",
"location": {}
},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Bolt",
"middle": [],
"last": "Beranek",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Harvard University",
"location": {}
},
"email": ""
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "This paper presents an analysis of analogies based on observations of oatural conversations. People's spontaneous use of analogies provides Inslg~t into their implicit evaluation procedures for analogies. The treatment here, therefore, reveals aspects of analogical processing that is somewhat more difficult to see in an experimental context. The work involves explicit treatment of the discourse context in which analogy occurs. A major focus here is the formalization of the effects of analogy on discourse development. There is much rule-llke behavior in this process, both in underlying thematic development of the discourse and in the surface lir~ulstlc forms used in this development. Both these forms of regular behavior are discussed in terms of a hierarchical structurin6 of a discourse into distinct, but related and linked, context spaces.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "P81-1015",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "This paper presents an analysis of analogies based on observations of oatural conversations. People's spontaneous use of analogies provides Inslg~t into their implicit evaluation procedures for analogies. The treatment here, therefore, reveals aspects of analogical processing that is somewhat more difficult to see in an experimental context. The work involves explicit treatment of the discourse context in which analogy occurs. A major focus here is the formalization of the effects of analogy on discourse development. There is much rule-llke behavior in this process, both in underlying thematic development of the discourse and in the surface lir~ulstlc forms used in this development. Both these forms of regular behavior are discussed in terms of a hierarchical structurin6 of a discourse into distinct, but related and linked, context spaces.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "People's use of analogies in conversation reveals a rich set of processing strategies.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Consider the following example.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "A: B:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "I. I think if you're going to marry someone in the 2. Hindu tradition, you have to -Well, you -They 3. say you give money to the family, to the glrl, 4. but in essence, you actually buy her.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "C:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "5. It's the same in the Western tradition. You 6. know, you see these greasy fat millionaires going 7. around with film stars, right? They've 8. essentially bought them by their status (?money). 9 . HO, but, there, the woman is selllng herself. 10. In these societies, the woman isn't selling 11. herself, her parents are selling her.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 195,
"end": 196,
"text": "9",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "C:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "There are several interesting things happening in this exchange. For example, notice that the analogy is argued and discussed by the conversants, and that in the arEumentatlon C uses the close discourse deictlo \"these\" tO refer to the in~tlatlng subject of the a~alogy, and that she uses the far discourse delctlo \"there\" to refer to the linearly closer analogous utterances. In addition, notice that C bases her rejection ca a noncorrespondence of relations effectlng the relation claimed constant between the two domains (women hei~ sold).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "C:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "She does not simply pick any arbitrary noncorrespondence between the two domains.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "C:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "In the body of this paper, I address and develop these types of phenomena accompanying analogies in naturally ongoing discourse.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "C:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The body of the paper is divided into four sections. First a theoretic framework for discourse is presented. This is followed by some theoretic work on analo~es, an integration of this work with the general theory of discourse proposed here, and an illuntratlon of how the II would llke to thank Dedre Gentner for many useful comments end discussions.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "C:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "integration of the different approaches explicates the issues under discussion.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "C:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "In the last section of the paper, I concentrate on some surface llngulstlo phenomena accompanying a oonversant's use of analogy in spontaneous discourse.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "C:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "A close analysis of spontaneous dialogues reveals that discourse processing is focused and enabled by a conversant's ability to locate ~ single frame of reference [19, 15, 16] for the discussion.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 163,
"end": 167,
"text": "[19,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 168,
"end": 171,
"text": "15,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 172,
"end": 175,
"text": "16]",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Context Space Theory of Discourse",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "In effective communication, listeners are able to identify such a frame of reference by partitioning discourse utterances into a hierarchical organization of distinct but related and linked context snaces. At any given point, only some of these context spaces are in the foreground of discourse.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Context Space Theory of Discourse",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "Foreg~ounded context spaces provide the ~eeded reference frame for subsequent discussion.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Context Space Theory of Discourse",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "abstract process model of discourse generation/interpretation incorporatlng a hierarchical view of discourse has been designed using the formalism of an Augmented Transition Network (ATN) [29] 2 .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 188,
"end": 192,
"text": "[29]",
"ref_id": "BIBREF21"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The ~Ta~r encoding the context space theory [20, 22] views a conversation as a sequence of conversatlooal moves. Conversational moves correspond to a speaker's communioatlve goal vis-A-vis a particular preceding section of discourse.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Among the types of conversational moves -speaker communicative goals -formalized in the grammar are:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Challenge, Support, Future-Generallzation, and Further-Development.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The correlation between a speakerPs utterances and a speaker's communicative goal in the context space grammar is somewhat s~m~lar to a theory of speech acts A la Austin, Searle, and Grloe [I, 2q, 9] .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 189,
"end": 199,
"text": "[I, 2q, 9]",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "As in the speech act theory, a speaker's conversatloral move is recognized as a functional communicative act [q] with an associated set of preconditions, effects, and mode of fulfillment. However, in the context space approach, the acts recognlzed are specific to maxlm-abldlng thematic conversational development, and their preconditions and effects stem from the discourse structure (rather than from/on arbitrary states in the external world).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 109,
"end": 112,
"text": "[q]",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "All utterances that serve the fulfillment of a slng~le communicative goal are partitloned into a single discourse unit -called a context space. A context space characterizes the role that its various parts play In the overall discourse structure and it explicates features relevant to \"well-formedness\" and \"maxim-abiding\" discourse development. ~ine types of context spaces have been formalized in the grammar representing the different constituent types of a discourse.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The spaces are characterized in much the same way as elements of a \u2022 Systemic Grammar\" A la Halllday [10] via attributes represented as \"slots\" per Minsky [I~] .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 101,
"end": 105,
"text": "[10]",
"ref_id": "BIBREF13"
},
{
"start": 155,
"end": 159,
"text": "[I~]",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "All context spaces have slots for the followlng elements:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "2The rules incorporated in the grammar by themselves do not form a complete system of discourse generation/inter pretatlon.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Rather, they enable specification of a set of high level Semantlc/log~Ical constraints that a surface lln~istlc from has to meet in order to fill a certain maxlm-abidlng conversational role at a given point in the discourse.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "o a propositional representation of the set of functionally related utterances said to iie An the space;",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "o the communicative goal served by the space; o a marker reflecting the influential status of the space at any given point in the discourse;",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "o links to preceding context spaces in relatlon to which this context space wan developed;",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "o specification at the relations involved.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "An equally important feature of a context space are its slots that hold the inferred components needed to recognize the communicative goal that the space serves in the discourse context. There are various ways to fulfill a given communicative goal, and usually, dependent on the mode of fulfillment and the goal in question, one can characterize a set of standardized implicit components that need to be inferred.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "For example, as noted by investigators of argumentation (e.g., [~, 23, 5, 22] ), in interpreting a proposition as supporting another, we often need to infer some sot of mappings between an Interred generic principle of support, the stated proposition of support, and the claim being supported. We must also infer some general rule of inference that allows for conclusion a claim given the explicit statements of support and these inferred components.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 63,
"end": 77,
"text": "[~, 23, 5, 22]",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "An",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "this standardization of inferential elaborations, I have oategorlzed dlfferent types of context spaces based on communicative goal and method fttlftllment charaeterlzatlons (i.e., specification of specific slots needed to hold the standardized inferential elaboratlons particular tO a g~Lven goal and mode of fulfillment).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Reflecting",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Dellneatioo of context spaces, then, is functlomally based, and in the context space grammar, ImplAclt components of a move are treated an much a part of the discourse as those components verbally expressed.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Reflecting",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Znterpretlng/understanding an analogy obviously involves some inferenoing ca the part of a listener. An analogous context space, therefore, has some slots particular to it.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Analogy Conversational Move",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "The grammar's characterization of an analogous context space is derivative from its for~uLl analysis of an analogy oonversatlom-l move. Gentner's analysis can be used to explain B's analogy between the Hindu and Western traditions in Excerpt I. The relation ~ BUYING WOMAN. FOR $0~ COMPANION FUNCTION is held constant between the two doma/ns, and the appropriateness Of the analogy iS not affected, for instance, hy the noncorrespondlng political views and/or religions of the two societies.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Analogy Conversational Move",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "While Gentner cuts down on the number of correspondences that must exist between two domains for an analogy to be considered good, she still leaves open a rather wide set o\u00a3 relations that must seemingly be matched between a base and target domain.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Structure-Happing Approach",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "We need some. way to further characterize Just those relations that must be mapped. For example, the relation TRADING WITH CHINA is totally irrelevant to the Hindu-Western analogy in this discourse context.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Structure-Happing Approach",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "As noted by Lakoff & Johnson [12] , metaphors simultaneously \"highlight\" and \"hide\" aspects of the two domains being mapped onto each other.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 29,
"end": 33,
"text": "[12]",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Structure-Happing Approach",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "The context space theory supplements both Lakoff & Johnson's analysis and the structure-mapplng approach in its ability to provide relevant relation characterization.. The context space grammar's analysis of analogies can be characterized by the following:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Structure-Happing Approach",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Explicating the connection between an utterance purportlng to make a claim analogous to another rests on recoghizlng that fc~. two propositions to be analogous, it anst be the cnse that they can bo ~h be seen an ~nstanc,s Of some more general claim, such that the predicates of all three propositions are identloal (i.e., relation identity), and the correspondent objects of the two domains involved are both subsets of some larger sot specified in this more general claim.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Context Space Approach",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "is based on specifylng some relation, RI, of one domain, that one implies (or claims) is not true in the other; or is based on specifying some non-ldentloal attrlbute-value pair ~'om whloh such a relation, RI, can be inferred.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Rejecting an analogy",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "In both cases, RI oust itself stand in a 'CAUSE' relation (or soma other such relatlon 3) with one Of the relations explicitly mentioned in the creation of the analogy (i.e., one being held constant between the two domains, that we csul call RC). Furthermore, it must be the cnse that the communicative goal of the analogy hinges on RI(RC) being true (or not true) in both of the domains.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Rejecting an analogy",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Re\u00a31ectlng this analysis of ~--!o~Les, all analogous context spaces have the followlng slot deflnltlons (among others).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A-alogous Context Spaces",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "This slot contains the generic proposltlon, P, of which the Inltlatlng and analogous claim are instances. Reflecting the fact that the same predication must be true of both cla.lms, 3Since aceordin~ to this analysis the prime focal point of the analogy is always the relations (i.e., \"actions\") being held constant, and a major aspect of an \"action\" is its cause (reason, intent, or effect of occurrence), a non~orrespondenoe in one of these relations will usually invalidate the point at the analogy.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Proposition:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Relations:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Mappings:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Relations:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "the predicate in the abstract slot is fixed; other elements of the abstract are variables corresponding to the abstracted clansea of which the specific elements mentionod in the analogous and initiating clalms are members.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Relations:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The structure of this slot, reflecting this importance of relation identity, consists of two subslots:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Relations:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "This slot contains a llst of the relations that are constant and true in the two domains. Analogy construction entails a local shift in toplo, and, therefore, in general, a/tar discussion of the analogous space (iscluding its component parts, such as \"supports-of,\" \"challenges-of,, etc.), we have immediate resumption of the initiating context space. (When analogies are used for goals ~ & 5 noted above, if the analogy is accepted, then there need not be a return to the initiating space.)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Relations:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "In this section, I present an analysis of an excerpt in which convereants spontaneously generate and argue about analog~les.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Illuetratlon",
"sec_num": "3.5"
},
{
"text": "The analysis hiEhlights the efficacy of inteKratlng the structure napping approach with r~e communicative gnal directed approach of the context space theory.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Illuetratlon",
"sec_num": "3.5"
},
{
"text": "The excerpt also illustrates the rule-llke behavior governing continued thematic development of a discourse after an analogy is given. N denies such a presummed negativity by arguing that it is possible to view America's involvement in Vietnam a~ coming to the aid of a country under foreign attack ~ (i.e., as a positive rather than a negative act).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Illuetratlon",
"sec_num": "3.5"
},
{
"text": "Thus, argues N, the \"cause\" relations of the acts being held constant between the two domain~ (i.e., enteran~e as a police force but being partisan) are quite different in the two cases.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Illuetratlon",
"sec_num": "3.5"
},
{
"text": "And, in the Vietnam case, the cause of the act obviates any common negativity associated with such \"unfair police force treatment.\"",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Illuetratlon",
"sec_num": "3.5"
},
{
"text": "There is no negativity of America to map onto England, and the whole purpose of the analogy has failed.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Illuetratlon",
"sec_num": "3.5"
},
{
"text": "Hence, according to 5Rq can be thought of as another way of loo~.ing at R1 and R2.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Illuetratlon",
"sec_num": "3.5"
},
{
"text": "Alternatively, it could be thought of as replacing RI and R2, since when one country invades another, we do ~ot usually co~slder third party intervention as mere \"coming in as a polio= force and taklng the slde of,\" but rather as an entrance into an ongoing war.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Illuetratlon",
"sec_num": "3.5"
},
{
"text": "However, I think in one light one oen view the relations of 81 and R2 holding in either an internal or external war.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Illuetratlon",
"sec_num": "3.5"
},
{
"text": "6Most criticisms of America's involvement in Vietnam rest on viewing it as an act of intervention in the internal affairs of a country agalnst the will of half oE its people.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Illuetratlon",
"sec_num": "3.5"
},
{
"text": "H, the analogy in thls discourse context is vacuous an~ warrants rejectlon 7. After N's rejection o~ M'e analogy, and N's offering o~\" an alternative analogy , which is somewhat accepted by M ~ as predicted by the gr--~r's analysis of an analogy conversational move u~ed for purposes or evaluatlon/Justlficatlon, it is time to have ~he initiating subject of the analogy returned-to (i.e., i~ is time to return to the subject of Br~Italn's moving into Ireland)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Illuetratlon",
"sec_num": "3.5"
},
{
"text": "The return, on Line 8N'= citing of this alternative analogy is supportive of the grammar's analysis that the purpose of an analogy is vital to Its acceptance, slope, it happens that N views Syria's intervention in Lebanon quite negatively: thus, her cho\u00a3ce of this domain where (An her view) is=re is plenty of negativity to ~p.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 15,
"end": 19,
"text": "Line",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Illuetratlon",
"sec_num": "3.5"
},
{
"text": "by the way, that in tsr'~a of \"at~ribute identity,\" Amities is a =mob closer latch to England than Syria la. This example supports the theory that \"attribute identity\" play= a milLimal role in analogy ~appings.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "9Notice,",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "10The fact that M attempts to map a \"cause\" relation between the two domains, further supports the theory that it is correspondence of sohesatizatlon or relations between dosmins, rather than object identity, that is a governing criteria in analogy construction and evaluation.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "9Notice,",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The rules of reference encoded in the context space grammar do not complement traditional pronominallzatlon theories which are based on criteria of recency and resulting potential semantic amblguities.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Rather, the rules are more in llne with the theory proposed by Olson who states that \"words designate, signal, or specify an intended referent relative to the set of alternatives from which it must be differentiated\" [17, p.26~] . The context space grammar is able to delineate this set of alternatives governlng a speaker's choice (and listener's resolution) of a referring expresslon ;I by continually updating its model of the discourse based on its knowledge of the effects associated with different types of conversational moves. create the discourse expectation that upon completion of the analogy, discussion of the initiating context space will be resummed (except in cases of communicative goals q and 5 noted above).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 217,
"end": 228,
"text": "[17, p.26~]",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Endin~ an analogy conversational move, makes available to the grammar the \"Resume-lnitlatlng\" discourse expectation, created when the analogy was first generated.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The effects of choosing this discourse expactation are to:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "11Lacking from thls theory, however, but hopefully to be included at a later date, is Webber's notion of evoked entities [27] (i.e., entities not previously mentioned in the discourse but which are derivative from itespecially, quantified sets).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 121,
"end": 125,
"text": "[27]",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "o Close the analogous context space (denoting that the space no longer plays a foreground discourse role); o reinstantlate the initiating context space as Active.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Excerpt 3 illustrates how the grammar's rule of reference and its updating actions for analo@les explain some seeming surprising surface linguistic forms used after an analo~ in the discourse. The excerpt is taken from an informal conversation between two friends.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "In the discussion, G is explaining to J the workings of a particle accelerator.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Under current discussion is the cavity of the accelerator through which protons are sent and accelerated. Particular attention should be given to G's referring expressions on Line 8 of the excerpt. On Line 9, G refers to the \"electrostatic potential\" last mentioned on Line 3. with the unmodified, close deictlc referring expression 12 \"the potential,\" despite the fact that lntervening~ty on Line 5 he had referenced \u2022 gravitational potential,\" a potential semantic contender for the unmodified noun phrase.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "In addition, G uses the close delctic \"here\" to refer to context space CI, though in terms of linear order, context space C2, the analogous context space, is the closer context space.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Both these surface linguistic phenomena are explainable and predictable by the context space theory.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Line 8 fulfills the discourse expectation of resummlr~ discussion of the initiating context space of the analogy.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "As noted, the effects of such a move are to close the analogous context space (here, C2) and to reassign the initiating space (here, CI) an active status.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "As noted, only elements of an active or controlling context space are viable contenders for pronominal and close deictlc references; elements of closed context spaces are not.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Hence, despite criteria of recency and resulting potentials of semantic ambiguity, G's references unambiguously refer to elements of CI, the active foregrounded context space in the discourse model.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "As a second example of speakers ualng close deictlcs to refer to elements of the initiating context space of an analogy, and corresponding use of far deictics for elements of the analogous space, lets re-consider Excerpt 1, repeated below.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "12Th e grammar considers nThe X\" a close deictlc reference as it is often used as a comple~ment to \"That X,\" a clear far deictic expression I. I think if you're going to marry someone in the 2. Hindu tradition, you have to -Well, you -They 3. say you give money to the family, to the glrl, q. but in essence, you actually ~uy her.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Surface Lingulstlc Phenomena",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "It's the same in the Western tradition. You 6. know, you see these greasy fat millionaires going 7. around with ~ilm stars, right? They've 8. essentially bought them by their status (?money). 9. No, but, there, the women is selling herself. 10. In these societies, the woman isn't selling 11. herself, her parents are selling her.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Lines ; -5: Context Space CI, The Initiating Space. Lines 5 -8: Context Space C3, The Analogous Space. LAnes 9 -11: Context Space C3, The Challenge Space.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "On Line 9, C rejects B's analogy (as signalled by her use Of the clue words, \"t~o, but\") by citing a nonoorrespondence of relations between the two domains. Notice that in the rejection, C uses the far daictic \u2022 there = to refer to an element of the linearly close analogous context space, C2,t3 and that she uses the clone de~ctlc \"these\" to refer to an 1~lement~ of the linearly far initiating context space, CI .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The grnmm\"r models C's move on Line 9 by processing the \u2022 Challenge-Analogy-Hap plngs\" (CAM) conversational move defined in its discourse network. This move is a subcategory of the grammar' s Challenge move category. Since this type of analogy challenge entails contrasting constituents of both the initiatlng and analogs context spaces'% the grammar must decide which of the two spaces should be in a controlling status, i.e., which space should serve as the frame of reference for subsequent processing.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Reflecting the higher influential status of the initiating context space, the grammar chooses it as its reference frame Is.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "As such, on its transition path for the CAM move, move, the gr-mnutr\" 13This conversation was recorded in Switzerland, and in terms of a locative use of delctics, Western society is the closer rather than Hindu society.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Thus, the choice of deict\u00a3c cannot be explained by appeal to external reference criteria.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "1~Notlce, however, that C does not use the close \" delctlc \"here,\" though it is a better contrastlve term with \"there\" than is =these.\"",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The rule of using close delctlcs seems to be slightly constrained in that if the referent of \"here = is a location, and the s~aker is not in the location being referenced, then, s/he cannot use \u2022 here.\"",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "15Zn a different type of analogy challenge, for example, one could simply deny the truth of the smalo~us utterances.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "16Zn the canes of Pre-Generalizatlon and Topic-Contrast-Shlft analogies, it is only after the analogy has been accepted that the analogous space is allowed to usurp the foreground role of the initiating context space.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "O puts the currently active context space (i.e., the analogous context space) in a state (reflecting its new background role); c leaves the initiating space in its Controlling state ( I. e., it has been serving as the reference frame for the analogy); o creates a new Active context space in which to put the challenge about to be put forward.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Performing such u~latlng actions, and using \u00a3ts rule that only elements in a controlling or active space are viable contenders for close delotlc and pronominal references, enables the grammar to correctly model, explain, and predict C's reference forms on Lines 9 11 of the excerpt.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "In this paper I have offered a treatment of analogies within spontaneous dlalo6ues.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "In order to do thls I first proposed a context space model of discourse.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "In the model discourse utterances are partitioned into discrete discourse units based on the communicative goal that they serve in the discussion.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "All communicative acts effect the precedlng discourse context and I have shown that by tracking these effects the grammar can specify a frame of reference for subsequent discussion. Then, a structure-~applng approach tO analogies was discussed. In this approach it is claimed that the focus of an analogy is on system~ of relatlonships between objects, rather than on attributes of objects. Analysis of naturally occurring analogies supported this claim. I then showed that the context space theory's communicative goal analysis of discourse enabled the theory to go beyond the struoture-mapplng approach by providing a further specification of waich klnds of relationships are most likely to be Included in description of an analogy.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Lastly, Z presented a number of excerpts taken from naturally ongoing discourse and showed how the context space analysis provided a cogent explanation for the types Of analogies found in dlsoouree, the types Of reJemt\u00a3ons given tO them, the rule-like thematic development of a dlsoourse after an a~alogy, and the surface llngulstlc forms used in these development.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "In conclusion, analyzing speakers spontaneous generation of analogies and other conversants' reaotlons to them, provides ua an usually direct form by which access individuals' implicit criteria for analogies.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "These exchanges reveal what conversants believe analogies are responsible for and thereby what i~ormatlon they need to convey.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "5"
}
],
"back_matter": [],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "~ow To Do T~n~s With Words",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [
"L"
],
"last": "Auatln",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1962,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Auatln J.L. ~ow To Do T~n~s With Words. Oxford University Press, 1962.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "Metaphor -A key to extenelble semantic analysis",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Carbonell",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1980,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the ACL",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "17--21",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Carbonell J. Metaphor -A key to extenelble semantic analysis. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the ACL, 1980, pp. 17-21,",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Elements of a plan-ha~ed theory of speech acts",
"authors": [
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cohen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Perrauzt",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1979,
"venue": "~ ~aienee i",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "177--212",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Cohen P. PerrauZt R. Elements of a plan-ha~ed theory of speech acts. ~ ~aienee i (1979), 177-212.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Component processes in analogical reasoning",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [
"B"
],
"last": "Searle",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1969,
"venue": "Psvcholo~c~l Review",
"volume": "8",
"issue": "",
"pages": "353--378",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Searle J.B. Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, 1969. 25. Sternberg R.J. Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psvcholo~c~l Review 8~ (1977), 353-378.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "The Uses 9\u00a3 Arlene",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Toulmln",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1958,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Toulmln S. The Uses 9\u00a3 Arlene. Cambridge University Press, 1958.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "~ formal aoDraoah tO discourse ana~hora",
"authors": [
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Webber",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1978,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Webber B. ~ formal aoDraoah tO discourse ana~hora. Ph.D. Th., Harvard University, 1978.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "Learning and reasoning by analogy. ~. Cohen R. Understanding arguments",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Winston",
"middle": [
"P"
],
"last": "",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Winston P.H. Learning and reasoning by analogy. ~. Cohen R. Understanding arguments.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence",
"authors": [],
"year": 1980,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "CSCSI, Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence, 1980.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "The structure of analogical models in science. ~51, Bolt Beranek and",
"authors": [
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gentner",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1980,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Gentner D. The structure of analogical models in science. ~51, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., 1980.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Metaphor as structure -preserving mapping",
"authors": [
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gentner",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1980,
"venue": "Proceedings American Psychological Association",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Gentner D. Metaphor as structure -preserving mapping. Proceedings American Psychological Association, 1980.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Are scientific analogies metaphors? Problems and Perspectives",
"authors": [
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gentner",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1981,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Gentner D. Are scientific analogies metaphors? Problems and Perspectives, 1981.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "Logic and conversation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [
"P"
],
"last": "Gflce",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1975,
"venue": "Syntax and Semantics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "GFlce, H. P. Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics, 1975 \u2022",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "Options and functions in the english clause",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "H~liday",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1969,
"venue": "8RNO Studies in Enmllsh",
"volume": "8",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "H~liday M. A. K. Options and functions in the english clause. 8RNO Studies in Enmllsh 8 (1969), .",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "Metaphor schemata, and selective inferenolng. Start[oral Research Isstltute",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hobbs",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1979,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hobbs J. Metaphor schemata, and selective inferenolng. Start[oral Research Isstltute, 1979.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "Images and models: Similes and metaphors. Metaphor and Thought",
"authors": [
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Miller",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1979,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "202--250",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Miller G.A. Images and models: Similes and metaphors. Metaphor and Thought,1979, pp. 202-250.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "A framework for representing knowledge. The Psychology of Computer Vision, 1975. 15. Neisser U. ~ ~svcholoav",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "I~",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Minsky",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1967,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "I~. Minsky M. A framework for representing knowledge. The Psychology of Computer Vision, 1975. 15. Neisser U. ~ ~svcholoav. Meredith Publishing Company, 1967.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "Language and thought: aspects of a cognitive theory of semantios",
"authors": [
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Olscn",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1970,
"venue": "~ Review",
"volume": "77",
"issue": "",
"pages": "2--7",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Olscn D. Language and thought: aspects of a cognitive theory of semantios. ~ Review 77, \" (1970), 2~7-273.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "Beyond literal similarity",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ortony",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1979,
"venue": "Proceedings of the ~ of /,~ ACM ~l",
"volume": "86",
"issue": "",
"pages": "161--180",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Ortony A. Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review 86 (1979), 161-180. Proceedings of the ~ of /,~ ACM ~l, 12 (1980), .",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF21": {
"ref_id": "b21",
"title": "Transition network grammars for natural language analysis",
"authors": [
{
"first": "W",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Woods",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1970,
"venue": "Comm. ACM",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "591--606",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Woods W. A. Transition network grammars for natural language analysis. Comm. ACM // ( 1970), 591-606.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"text": "analogy evaluation: o the structure mapping theory o relevant context identification o communicative goal identification",
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null,
"num": null
},
"FIGREF1": {
"text": "terms of the constant predicates and their variable role fillers. This slot contains a llst of lists, where each llst corresponds to a variable of the generic proposition, P, and the m-ppings of the objects of the domain specified in the initiating context space onto the objects specified in the analogous context space. 3.~ Communicative Goals Served by Analogies An analogY conversational move can carve in fulfillment of a number of different communicative goals. Major roles currently identified are: I. Means of Explanation 2. Means of Support 3-Means of Implicit Judgement (i.e., conveying an evaluative opinion on a given state-of-a/falrs by comparing it to a situation for which opinion, either positive or negative, is assumed generally shared) 4. Topic ShiSt by Contrast 5. Hemna for Future-GeneraLizatlon ~n maxlm-abldlng discourse, only elements felt to be directly analogous cr contrastlve to elements contained in the Inltiat~ng context space are discussed in the analogous space\".",
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null,
"num": null
},
"FIGREF2": {
"text": "is taken from a taped conversation between two friends, M and N, wherein M, a British citizen, is trying to explain to H, an American, the history cf the current turmoil in Ireland. The conversational moves involved in the excerpt (A & D being of the same category) are the following: A: ADalogy B: Challenge of Analogy C: Defense of A~alogy D: Alternate Aralogy E: Return to the initiating context space of theanalogy; with the return belng in the form of a \"Further-Development\" (as signalled by the clue \"sow\").",
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null,
"num": null
},
"FIGREF3": {
"text": "purpose of M's analogy is to hig~llght her negative assessment of England in the Ireland altuatlon (as identified by her utterance, \"And, whatOs made it worse this tlme ...\").M attempts to accomplish this by mapplng the presummed acknowledged negative assessment of America in Vietnam onto England.Such a negative evaluative ~apping, however, can only occur of course if one oondenns America's involvement in Vietnam.",
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null,
"num": null
},
"FIGREF4": {
"text": "pair are in the set of alternatives vying for pronominal and close delctic referring expressions. The context space grammar continually updates its model of the discourse so that at any given point it knows which preceding utterances are currently in the active and controlling context spaces. Discourse model updating is governed by the effects of a conversational move. Major effects of most conversational moves are: o changes to the influential statuses of preceding context spacesdenoting its foreground role during the processing of the analogous space); o create a new Active context space to contain the forthcoming analogous utterances;",
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null,
"num": null
},
"FIGREF5": {
"text": "'s just a pure electrostatic field, which, 2. between two points, and the proton accelerates3. through the electrostatic potential. ~. Okay. 5. Same physical law as if you drop a ball. It 6. accelerates through a gravitational potential. 7. Okay. 8: And the only important point here is that 9. the potential is maintained with this 10. Cockcroft-Walton unit. Context Space CI, The Initiating ~pace. Context Space C2, The Analogous Space. Context Space CI, The Resumption.",
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null,
"num": null
},
"TABREF0": {
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "",
"html": null,
"content": "<table><tr><td colspan=\"2\">Identification</td><td colspan=\"6\">of those aspects of knowledge considered</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"7\">important in analogy seems to be of major cavern</td><td>in</td></tr><tr><td>current</td><td colspan=\"2\">Investlgatlon</td><td>of</td><td>this</td><td colspan=\"2\">cognitive</td><td>task</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\">(e.g., [2, 3, 6, 7, 8, GentnerJs ~</td><td/><td colspan=\"4\">theory [6, 7, 8] seems most</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\">compatlble with the</td><td colspan=\"5\">findings of the context space</td></tr><tr><td>approach.</td><td colspan=\"7\">Gentner argues that analogies aa-e based on an</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"8\">implicit understanding that \"identical operations and</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"7\">relationships hol~ among non identical things.</td><td>The</td></tr><tr><td>relational</td><td/><td>structure</td><td>is</td><td>preserved,</td><td>hut</td><td>not</td><td>the</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\">objects\" [8, p.~].</td><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr></table>"
},
"TABREF1": {
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "Vietnam and South Vietnam. 17. No, I meant war. You know, moving in and sayln6 18o we're a police action and actually flg~ting a war 19. when you got there. 20. Oh, well, that's Syria, that's obviously Syria, 21. rlght? Who are implicitly supporting -not 22. supportlng -'cause actually it's very similar 23. in Lebanon, right? You have the Catholics and 2~. the Moslem. That's right, that's Lebanon. 25. I suppose, yes. 26. You have the Catholics and the Moslem, and then 27. Syria's eomlng in and implicitly supporting the 28. Moslem, because Syria itself is Moslem. 29. Now, England is Protestant?",
"html": null,
"content": "<table><tr><td colspan=\"3\">3.5.1 Analysis</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>We</td><td>~an</td><td colspan=\"2\">begin</td><td>the</td><td>analysis</td><td>with</td><td>a</td><td>more</td><td>formal</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"10\">chaFaoterlzatlon of M's analogy conversational move.</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"9\">The generic proposition underlying N's analogy:</td></tr><tr><td/><td colspan=\"2\">$Countryl</td><td colspan=\"3\">81 $Country2</td><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td/><td colspan=\"2\">$Countryl</td><td colspan=\"3\">R2 NEthnioGroup2</td><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td colspan=\"6\">Where, the constant relations are:</td><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td/><td colspan=\"5\">R1: MOVE-IN-AS-~OLICE-FORCE</td><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td/><td colspan=\"4\">H2: TAKE-SIDE-OF</td><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td colspan=\"7\">The objects sapped onto each other:</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td/><td colspan=\"4\">Mappings1: England,</td><td>America</td><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td/><td colspan=\"4\">Mappings2: Ireland,</td><td>Vietnam</td><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td/><td colspan=\"7\">Mapping=S: Protestants, South Viet~amese</td><td/></tr><tr><td colspan=\"9\">The communicative goal served by the analogy:</td></tr><tr><td/><td colspan=\"5\">Negative Evaluation on England</td><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td colspan=\"10\">In rejection of the analogy, N claims that in the Vietnam</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"9\">case alone the following three relations occur:</td></tr><tr><td/><td colspan=\"4\">R3: FOREIGN INVASION</td><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td/><td colspan=\"6\">Rq: AID AGAINST FOREIGN INVASION</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td/><td colspan=\"2\">RS: CAUSE</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td colspan=\"7\">Where, R5 la a relation between relations,</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td/><td colspan=\"2\">qOf course,</td><td/><td colspan=\"6\">this does not preclude explicitly noted</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\">digressions.</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr></table>"
}
}
}
} |