File size: 66,513 Bytes
6fa4bc9 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 | {
"paper_id": "P96-1017",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T09:02:53.007235Z"
},
"title": "Coordination as a Direct Process",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Augusta",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mela",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "LIPN-CNRS URA 1507",
"institution": "Universit6 de Paris XIII",
"location": {
"postCode": "93 430",
"settlement": "Villetaneuse",
"country": "FRANCE"
}
},
"email": "am@urals07@univ-paris13.fr"
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "We propose a treatment of coordination based on the concepts of functor, argument and subcategorization. Its formalization comprises two parts which are conceptually independent. On one hand, we have extended the feature structure unification to disjunctive and set values in order to check the compatibility and the satisfiability of subcategorization requirements by structured complements. On the other hand, we have considered the conjunction e$ (and) We claim here that the \"local combinatory potential\" of lexical heads, encoded in the subcategorization feature, explains the previous linguistic facts: conjuncts may be of different categories as well as of more than one constituent, they just have to satisfy the subcategorization constraints.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "P96-1017",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "We propose a treatment of coordination based on the concepts of functor, argument and subcategorization. Its formalization comprises two parts which are conceptually independent. On one hand, we have extended the feature structure unification to disjunctive and set values in order to check the compatibility and the satisfiability of subcategorization requirements by structured complements. On the other hand, we have considered the conjunction e$ (and) We claim here that the \"local combinatory potential\" of lexical heads, encoded in the subcategorization feature, explains the previous linguistic facts: conjuncts may be of different categories as well as of more than one constituent, they just have to satisfy the subcategorization constraints.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "as the head of the coordinate structure, so that coordinate structures stem simply from the subcategorization specifications of et and the general schemata of a head saturation. Both parts have been encoded within HPSG using the same resource that is the subcategorization and its principle which we have just extended.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "(1) Jean danse la vMse et le tango (Jean dances the waltz and the tango.) (2) Je sais son gge et qu'elle est venue ici.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "(I know her age and that she came here.) ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Coordination has Mways been a centre of academic interest, be it in linguistic theory or in computational linguistics. The problem is that the assumption according to only the constituents of the same category (1) may be conjoined is false; indeed, coordinations of different categories (2)-(3) and of more than one constituent (4)-(5) should not be dismissed though being marginal in written texts and must he accounted for 1.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "1This research has been done for the French coordination et (and) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 60,
"end": 65,
"text": "(and)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "We focus here on the coordination of syntagmatic categories (as opposite of lexical categories). More precisely, we account for cases of non constituent coordination (4), of Right Node Raising (5) but not for cases of Gapping.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Our approach which is independent of any framework, is easily and precisely encoded in the formalism of Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG) (Pollard and Sag, 1994) , which is based on the notion of head and makes available the feature sharing mechanism we need. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 gives a brief description of basic data and discusses some constraints and available structures. Section 3 summarizes previous approaches and section 4 is devoted to our approach. The french coordination with el serves throughout the paper as an example.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 148,
"end": 171,
"text": "(Pollard and Sag, 1994)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "The classical typology of coordination, i.e. coordination of constituents (1) and of non-constituents, hides some regularity of the phenomenon as it focuses on concepts of constituent and syntactic category.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A brief description of Basic Data and Constraints",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "A coordination of constituents is interpreted as one phrase without any gap. The constituents may be of the same category (1) as well as of different categories (2)-(3). However, this last case is constrained as examplified hereafter 2.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A brief description of Basic Data and Constraints",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "(2) Je sais son gge et qu'elle est venue ici.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A brief description of Basic Data and Constraints",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "(I know her age and that she came here.) (2a) Je sais son \u00a3ge et son adresse.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A brief description of Basic Data and Constraints",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "(I know her age and her address.) (2b) Je sais qu'elle a 30 ans et qu'elle est venue ici.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A brief description of Basic Data and Constraints",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "(I know that she is 30 and that she came here.) (2c) *Je sais \u00a3 Marie et qu'elle est venue ici. *(I know to Marie and that she came here.) (2d) 3e demande l'addition et que quelqu'un paie.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A brief description of Basic Data and Constraints",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "(I ask for the bill and for someone to pay.) (2e) *]e rends ]'addition et que quelqu'un paie. *(I give back the bill and someone to pay.)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A brief description of Basic Data and Constraints",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "In these examples, the coordinate structure acts as the argument of the verb. This verb must subcategorize for each constituent of the coordination and this is not the case in example (2c)-(2e). Note that modelizing coordination of different categories as the unification (i.e. underspecification) of the different categories would lead to accept the six examples or wrongly reject (2d) according to the descriptions used 3. Coordination of more than one constituent are often classified as Conjunction Reduction (4), Gapping (la-lb) and Right Node Raising (5) (Hudson, 1976 ).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 561,
"end": 574,
"text": "(Hudson, 1976",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A brief description of Basic Data and Constraints",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "(la) Jean danse la valse et Pierre, le tango.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A brief description of Basic Data and Constraints",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "(Jean dances the waltz and Pierre the tango.) (lb) Hier, Jean a dans~ la valse et aujourd'hui, le tango. (Yesterday, Jean danced the waltz and today, the tango.)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A brief description of Basic Data and Constraints",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "In the case of Gapping structures, the subject (la) and/or an extracted element (lb) is present in the two sides. Two structures are available in case of Conjunction Reductions. One structure corresponds to a coordination of sentences with a gap of the verb after el, the other one consists in taking the coordinate parallel sequence of constituents as only one structure. The previous facts argue for the second possibility (see also section 3 for criticism of deletion approach).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A brief description of Basic Data and Constraints",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "Last, note that gapping the verb is less compatible with head-driven mechanisms (and the comma in (4f) could be such a head mark, see (BEF, 1996) for an analysis of Gapping coordinations). It seems then that the structure needed for Conjunction Reduction is some generalization of the standard structure used for coordination of constituents. Our proposal is then focused on this extension. We do not care of Gapping cases as their linguistic properties seem to be different.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 134,
"end": 145,
"text": "(BEF, 1996)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A brief description of Basic Data and Constraints",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "It remains to integrate Right-Node Raising and to extend these cases to more complicated ones. Section 4 includes examples of such cases and shows that our proposal can manage them adequately.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A brief description of Basic Data and Constraints",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "There exists a classical way to eschew the question \"what can be coordinated ?\" if one assumes a deletion analysis. Indeed, according to this approach (Chomsky, 1957; Banfield, 1981) , only coordination of sentences are basic and other syntagmatic coordinations should be considered as coordinations of reduced sentences, the reduction being performed by deleting repeated elements. This approach comes up against insurmountable obstacles, chiefly with the problem of applying transformation in reverse, in the analysis process (Schachter, 1973) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 151,
"end": 166,
"text": "(Chomsky, 1957;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
},
{
"start": 167,
"end": 182,
"text": "Banfield, 1981)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 528,
"end": 545,
"text": "(Schachter, 1973)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF14"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Previous Approaches",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "A direct approach has been proposed at once by Sag & al. (Sag et al., 1985) within the framework of Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar (GPSG), by (Pollard and Sag, 1994) within HPSG, and (Bresnan, 1986) within Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG). These approaches have tried to account for coordination of different categories in reducing the constraint from requiring the same category for conjuncts to a weaker constraint of category compatibility. Whatever the nature of subcategorization information may be, syntactical in GPSG, hybrid in HPSG, functional in LFG, two categories are compatible if they subsume a \"common denominator\", in this case a common partial structure.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 47,
"end": 75,
"text": "Sag & al. (Sag et al., 1985)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF13"
},
{
"start": 148,
"end": 171,
"text": "(Pollard and Sag, 1994)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
},
{
"start": 189,
"end": 204,
"text": "(Bresnan, 1986)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Previous Approaches",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "Technically, the compatibility is checked by computing a \"generalization\" of categories and imposing the generalization comprises all features expected in the given context. For example, the context in (6), that is, the verb ~tre (to be), expects a predicative argument and both categories NP and AP are just predicative categories.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Previous Approaches",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "(6) I1 est le p~re de Marie et tier de l'~tre.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Previous Approaches",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "(He is Mary's father and proud of it.)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Previous Approaches",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "However, this solution cannot be applied generally because all coordinations have not such \"natural\" intersection (see (2)). So we claim that we have nothing else to do but explicitly enumerate, within the head subcategorization feature, all the structures allowed as complement.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Previous Approaches",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "Our proposition involves three stages. We begin by formulating constraints on coordinate structures, then we define how to build the coordinate structures and we end by specifying how the previous constraints filter through such coordinate structures.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Our Approach",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "In order to precisely formulate the constraints on coordinate structures, we distinguish the role of funcfor and that of argument, where functor categories are those that bear unsatisfied subcategorization requirements, as it is the case in CategoriM Grammars (Dowty, 1988) . Lexical heads (1) are functors in relation to the arguments they select and, by composition, any expression that contains an unsaturated functor is a functor (5)-(7).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 260,
"end": 273,
"text": "(Dowty, 1988)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "(7) I1 pretend d~tester et refuse ces beaux spots lumineux.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "(He claims to hate and refuses these beautiful spotlights.)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "Arguments are the complements selected by the head 4. An argument may often be realized by different categories. For example, the argument required by savoir (to know) may be a NP or a Completive: we say that the requirement is disjunctive and we represent the different alternatives within subcategorization feature disjunctive values. An argument specification is then a disjunction of categories. When the lexical head requires several complements (to ask somebody something), the requirement is said multiple or n-requirement. To the extent that disjunction only appears in argument specifications, a n-requirement is a multi-set of simple requirements. The choice of set (or more precisely multiset) rather than list vMue for the feature SUBCAT allows us to account for Je demande ~ Pierre son vdlo as well as Je demande son vdlo ~ Pierre. Gunji (Gunji, 1987) makes the same choice. However our criterion can be formalized in a theory whose order of arguments obeys to an obliqueness hierarchy.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 851,
"end": 864,
"text": "(Gunji, 1987)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "Requirement inheritance. A functor may compose with another functor or with arguments. In functor-arguments composition, the resulting expression inherits the unsatisfied requirement from the functor when it is not empty. For example, in (5), both conjuncts inherit the unsatisfied requirement from their heads. Likewise the functor composition inherits a requirement from the unsatisfied functor ~. In 7, pretend d~tester inherits the unsatisfied requirement of d~tester, i.e. the requirement of an object. Adjuncts. To account for the continuum which exists from strictly subcategorized complements to adjuncts, we adopt the hypothesis suggested by (Miller, 1991) according to which adjuncts could be accorded the same status as arguments by integrating them into the subcategorization requirement through an optional lexical rule. That would enable us to account for coordination of adjuncts of different categories (3) as well as coordination of more than one constituent with adjuncts (10)-(11) below. Note that we may still have a special feature AD-JUNCT in order to distinguish adjuncts from other complements if necessary. Note also that these lexical rules can be interpreted statically as well as dy-namicMly. In the first case, the extended lexicon is pre-computed and requires no runtime application.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 651,
"end": 665,
"text": "(Miller, 1991)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "4In this paper, we restrict arguments to complements. In our HPSG encoding, they are treated in the SUBCAT feature. In a Borsley-like manner, we suppose a special feature for the subject. However, our approach can be generalized to subjects.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "5In functor composition, functors cannot be both unsaturated: ~\" 1l promet de manger d sa m~re des bananes.(* he promises to eat his mother bananas.), cf. the Incomplete Constituent Constraint (Pollard and Sag, 1994 ).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 193,
"end": 215,
"text": "(Pollard and Sag, 1994",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "Satisfiability conditions of requirements. We observe here that a coordination of different categories may appear as head complement when the head requirement is disjunctive and a coordination of more than one constituent appears when such a requirement is multiple. Last, functors may conjoin when their subcategorization requirements are compatible. These observations are synthesized in one coordination criterion.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "The first observation is summarized in (C1) and illustrated in (2').",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "(C1) A subcategorization 1-requirement is satisfied either by one of the disjuncts or by a coordination of disjuncts.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "(2') Je sais son ~ge/qu'elle est venue ici / son \u00a3ge et qu'elle est venue iei. (I know her age/that she came here [ her age and that she came here.)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "The second one is illustrated below, where subcategorization n-requirements are satisfied either by:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 a series of n complements which satisfy respectively the n requirements \u2022 or adjuncts of different categories (3).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "(3) Un livre int@ressant et quej'aurai du plaisir \u00a3 life. (An interesting book and which I will enjoy to read.) All these situations are summarized in (C2):",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "(C2) A subcategorization n-requirement is satis-] fled by m arguments,0 < m < n~ either by a se-[ quence of m arguments such That each argument [ satisfies one and only one element of the require-I ment or by a coordination of such sequences. The I result has a n --m requirement. ]",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "Coordination criterion : satisfying and imposing requirements. As an entity can be both functor and argument (12)-(13) our coordination criterion (necessary condition) is the following one: the conjuncts must satisfy the same simple or multiple subcategorization requirement and impose compatible subcategorization requirements.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Constraints on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "We have now to define an extension of the usual unification U of structures in order to compute the subcategorization requirements compatibility. This extension is an internal operation over the subcategorization requirements which accounts for disjunctive and set values. U is the unification of argument specifications defined from U, U + is its extension to n-requirements.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Computing the subcategorization requirements compatibility",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Unification of two argument specifications ~ and/3. Note that (C1) and (C2) should be computed simultaneously in order to account for structures as (9). The notion of partial saturation in (C2) allows us to account for coordination of sub-series of arguments as in (10).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Computing the subcategorization requirements compatibility",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "~hnctors coordination and compatibility of requirements. Functors may be simple (1), composed (7), of different structures (12) or partially saturated (13)-(5).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Computing the subcategorization requirements compatibility",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "(12) Je pense offrir et que je recevrai des cadeaux.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Computing the subcategorization requirements compatibility",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "(I think to offer and that I will receive gifts.) (13) Je pense recevoir de Jean et offrir \u00a3 Pierre du caviar de Russie. (I expect to receive from John and offer to Peter Russian caviar.)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Computing the subcategorization requirements compatibility",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "In all cases, when they are conjoined, they share their arguments: there must therefore exist at least one possibility of satisfying them simultaneously. In this case, the unification of their subcategorization requirements succeeds and they are said to be compatible and the two functors may be conjoined. This unification has to account for disjunctive values. I Two n-requirements are compatible iff their uni-I fication//+ succeeds.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Computing the subcategorization requirements compatibility",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "We consider that conjoined functors should have the same valence 6. Note that the unification of two n-requirements is ambiguous because we may have several permutations which lead to success.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "I",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Until now we have just defined constraints on the coordinate structures but we did not mention how these structures are built. We want that a coordinate structure inherits features from its conjuncts without necessarily failing in case of conflicting values. The generalization method (Sag et al., 1985) has this objective but overgenerates because the conflicting values are ignored. In contrast, the use of composite categories (Cooper, 1991) The structuring of categories : composite and tuple of categories. We propose to extend the operation A to complex categories and to use a new connective < ... > in order to define tuple of categories. With these two connectives, a total structuring of categories is possible and all the coordinate structures may have a status. For example, the underlined expression in (14) will be represented by the structured category: (pp, [NPACornpl] The extension to complex categories is not uniform. Coordinate structure features are not necessarily composites or tuples of corresponding features from each conjunct. In fact, features which are allowed to have conflicting values will be compounded, whereas other features as SUBCAT must unify. This structuring is encoded later within the definition of the lexical entry of et.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 285,
"end": 303,
"text": "(Sag et al., 1985)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF13"
},
{
"start": 430,
"end": 444,
"text": "(Cooper, 1991)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
},
{
"start": 874,
"end": 885,
"text": "[NPACornpl]",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "How coordinate structures are built",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "Lexicalization of the coordination rule. We consider, as in (Paritong, 1992) , the conjunction et as the head of the coordinate structure. Consequently, coordinate structures no longer have to be postulated in the grammar by a special rule of coordination: they stem simply from the general 6This condition will forbid the conjunction of e.g. verbs with SUBCAT lists of different lengths, but which would have a unification under the alternative interpretation, thus avoiding sentences like *John bought and gave the book to Mary, (Miller, 1991) . schemata of the head saturation and the subcategorization specifications of the conjunction. For sake of simplicity, only binary coordination is treated here. (Paritong, 1992) accounts for multiple coordination as a binary structure where the comma has a similar function as a lexical conjunction. With that one restriction, the tIPSG-like lexical entry of et can be: xl, ..., IMl>^<llq ..... [Mq>lCat= ['Part <Ca, ..., CM>A<C~, ..., C~M> Part C1 Part C | |Sub, at I, , , , reart C: 1 ..... r Part elM \"] I I I''' [S,,b,~,~ {}] ' ...,t'\" J [S~,b~at \u00a2'~J ' The following LP-constraint on the lexical entry of et ensures the correct order of conjunction and conjuncts:",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 60,
"end": 76,
"text": "(Paritong, 1992)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
},
{
"start": 531,
"end": 545,
"text": "(Miller, 1991)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
},
{
"start": 707,
"end": 723,
"text": "(Paritong, 1992)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
},
{
"start": 916,
"end": 919,
"text": "xl,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 920,
"end": 924,
"text": "...,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 925,
"end": 962,
"text": "IMl>^<llq ..... [Mq>lCat= ['Part <Ca,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 963,
"end": 967,
"text": "...,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 968,
"end": 976,
"text": "CM>A<C~,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 977,
"end": 981,
"text": "...,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 982,
"end": 1009,
"text": "C~M> Part C1 Part C | |Sub,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1010,
"end": 1015,
"text": "at I,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1016,
"end": 1017,
"text": ",",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1018,
"end": 1019,
"text": ",",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1020,
"end": 1021,
"text": ",",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1022,
"end": 1052,
"text": "reart C: 1 ..... r Part elM \"]",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1062,
"end": 1103,
"text": "[S,,b,~,~ {}] ' ...,t'\" J [S~,b~at \u00a2'~J '",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "How coordinate structures are built",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "I Phon \\et\\ Synsern <[",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "How coordinate structures are built",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "[i] <conj < [i'], where i E [1, M], i' E [1', M']",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "How coordinate structures are built",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": ". This LP-constraint is the minimum required to distinguish the two parts of the coordinate structure. However, the functor this coordinate structure (partially-)saturates may impose its own LPconstraint (e.g. an obliqueness hierarchy). In such a case, this LP-constraint has to be satisfied simultaneously by the two sets {[1],..., [M]} and {[lq,..., [Mq}. To represent the inheritance of the complements, here ~M//+ff~, we use a mechanism of argument composition inspired by (I-Iinrichs and Nakazawa, 1994) : the conjunction et takes as complements the two conjuncts < C1,...,CM > and < C~,...,C~ > which may remain unsaturated for their complements (]~M and ~4, and the set (I~M/~q-(]?~/. The coordination of m-tuples, as well as the coordination of simple conjuncts (M = 1) stems from the saturation of the conjunction eL As noted in 4.1., only the last element of the tuple CM (or C~) can be unsaturated and be the source of inheritance. Example of resulting HPSG-like anMysis is given in figure 1 for the underlined phrase in (15). ",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 333,
"end": 357,
"text": "[M]} and {[lq,..., [Mq}.",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 477,
"end": 508,
"text": "(I-Iinrichs and Nakazawa, 1994)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "How coordinate structures are built",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "We have now to define how arguments satisfy disjunctive and set requirements. Intuitively, if ai is a (possibly disjunctive) argument specification, an argument (possibly composite) satisfies ai iff each element of the composite category matches one disjunct of ai. Then, if ff is a n-requirement, a tuple (or a coordination of tuples) of categories (possibly composite) satisfies ff iff each element of the tuple (for each tuple) satisfies one and only one argument specification of ft. More formally: ii) let \u2022 be a n-requirement s.t.:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "How the constraints apply on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.4"
},
{
"text": "Phon \\A",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "How the constraints apply on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.4"
},
{
"text": ": v...v <,...,,< v...v",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "How the constraints apply on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.4"
},
{
"text": "and E be a coordination of p tuples (if p > 1) or one tuple (if p = 1) of composite categories C k s.t.:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "How the constraints apply on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.4"
},
{
"text": "=< q,...,c, > ^...^ < > = A,=,. 4 t,r then satisfies ~ iff each specification ai has one and only one realization in each tu-",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "How the constraints apply on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.4"
},
{
"text": "ple of E (iffVk E [1,p], 3 a permutation rrk on [1, n]/Vi E [1, n] C~kti ]k satis- fies '~i).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "How the constraints apply on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.4"
},
{
"text": "Note that these requirement satisfiability conditions allows us to account for examples such as (9).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "How the constraints apply on coordinate structures",
"sec_num": "4.4"
},
{
"text": "We extend here the functor saturation schemata to the coordination case, within the framework of Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (Pollard and Sag, 1994) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 134,
"end": 157,
"text": "(Pollard and Sag, 1994)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A Coding in HPSG",
"sec_num": "4.5"
},
{
"text": "A subcategorization n-requirement is satisfied by m arguments, m < n, either by a sequence of m arguments (m-tuple) or by a coordination of mtuples. The result has a n -m requirement. Branches = [B -Yead[Synsem[Cat[Subcat ~ U ~] [B -Comp = ~[Subcat ~'] where E satisfies ~ and: Note that within a theory as HPSG which integrates syntactic and semantic information in a single representation, a whole range of lexically determined dependencies, e.g. case assignment, government (of particular prepositions) and role assignment, are modeled at the same time via subcategorization because the value of subcategorization feature is a complex of syntactic and semantic information. r~ U ~Z is the set-union of ~ and t9 This approach based on concept of functor, argument and subcategorization allows us to account for many coordination data. Its formalization comprises two parts which are conceptually independent. On one hand, we have extended the feature structure unification to disjunctive and set values in order to check the compatibility and the satisfiability of subcategorization requirements by structured complements. On the other hand, we have considered the conjunction et as the head of the coordinate structure, so that coordinate structures stem simply from the subcategorization specifications of et and a general schemata of the head saturation. Both parts have been encoded within HPSG using the same resource that is the subcategorization and its principle which we have just extended. It remains to know in which extent our approach can be used for other linguistic phenomena with symetrical sequences of more than one constituent (comparative constructions, Mternative constructions):",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 195,
"end": 252,
"text": "[B -Yead[Synsem[Cat[Subcat ~ U ~] [B -Comp = ~[Subcat ~']",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A Coding in HPSG",
"sec_num": "4.5"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 \u00a2 = {< s v",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A Coding in HPSG",
"sec_num": "4.5"
},
{
"text": "(16) Paul donne autant de couteaux aux filles que de pi~ces aux garcons. (Paul gives as much knives to the girls as coins to the boys.)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A Coding in HPSG",
"sec_num": "4.5"
}
],
"back_matter": [],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Stylistic deletion in coordinate structures",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Banfield",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1981,
"venue": "Linguistics Analysis",
"volume": "7",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "1--32",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Banfield, A. 1981. Stylistic deletion in coordinate structures. Linguistics Analysis, 7(1):1-32.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "La coordination ~ trou4e : 4tude et analyse en GPSG et HPSG",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bouchard",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Emirkanian",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "C",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fouquer4",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1996,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Bouchard, L., Emirkanian, L., Fouquer4, C. 1996. La coordination ~ trou4e : 4tude et analyse en GPSG et HPSG. In submission.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "Coordination and the Flow of Information Through Phrase Structure",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bresnan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kaplan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "Peterson",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1986,
"venue": "Ms",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Bresnan, J., Kaplan, R., Peterson, P. 1986. Co- ordination and the Flow of Information Through Phrase Structure. Ms., CSLI, Stanford Univer- sity.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Structures syntaxiques",
"authors": [
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chomsky",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1957,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Chomsky, N. 1957. Structures syntaxiques. Seuil.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Coordination in unificationbased grammars",
"authors": [
{
"first": "1%",
"middle": [
"P"
],
"last": "Cooper",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1991,
"venue": "Proceedings of the ACL",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "167--172",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Cooper, 1%. P. 1991. Coordination in unification- based grammars. In Proceedings of the ACL, pages 167-172.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "Type raising, functional composition, and non-constituent conjunction",
"authors": [
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [
"; T"
],
"last": "Dowty",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Oehrle",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1988,
"venue": "Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures. 1%ichard",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "153--197",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dowty, D. 1988. Type raising, functional composi- tion, and non-constituent conjunction. In Catego- rial Grammars and Natural Language Structures. 1%ichard T. Oehrle et al., pages 153-197.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Japanese Phrase Structure Grammar",
"authors": [
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gunji",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1987,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Gunji, T. 1987. Japanese Phrase Structure Gram- mar. Dordrecht, 1%eidel.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "Linearizing AUXs in German Verbal Complexes",
"authors": [
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "I-Iinrichs",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nakazawa",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1994,
"venue": "German in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "I-Iinrichs, E. and T. Nakazawa. 1994. Linearizing AUXs in German Verbal Complexes. In Ger- man in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Conjunction reduction, gapping and right-node raising",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hudson",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1976,
"venue": "Language",
"volume": "52",
"issue": "3",
"pages": "535--562",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hudson, R. 1976. Conjunction reduction, gapping and right-node raising. Language, 52(3):535-562.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Clitics and Constituents in Phrase Structure Grammar",
"authors": [
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "Miller",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1991,
"venue": "Facult4 de Philosophie et Lettres en Institut de 1%echerches en Intelligence Artificielle (I1%IDIA)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Miller, P. 1991. Clitics and Constituents in Phrase Structure Grammar. Ph.D. thesis, Universit@ libre de Bruxelles, Facult4 de Philosophie et Lettres en Institut de 1%echerches en Intelligence Artificielle (I1%IDIA).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Constituent coordination in HPSG",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Paritong",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1992,
"venue": "KONVENS 92",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "228--237",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Paritong, M. 1992. Constituent coordination in HPSG. In KONVENS 92, pages 228-237.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar",
"authors": [
{
"first": "C",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pollard",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "I",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Sag",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1994,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Pollard, C. and I. A. Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. CSLI.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language and Linguistic theory",
"authors": [
{
"first": "I",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sag",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gazdar",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wasow",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Weisler",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1985,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "117--171",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Sag, I., G. Gazdar, T. Wasow, and S. Weisler. 1985. Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language and Linguistic theory, (3):117- 171.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "Conjunction",
"authors": [
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "Schachter",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1973,
"venue": "The Major structures of English. Holt, Rinehart and Winston",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Schachter, P. 1973. Conjunction. In The Major structures of English. Holt, Rinehart and Win- ston, chapter 6.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Gapping as constituent coordination",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Steedman",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1990,
"venue": "Linguistics and Philosophy",
"volume": "",
"issue": "13",
"pages": "207--263",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Steedman, M. 1990. Gapping as constituent coordi- nation. Linguistics and Philosophy, (13):207-263.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"type_str": "figure",
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": "Je recommande ~ Pierre la lecture et qu'il s'inspire de la Bible. (I recommend to Peter the lecture and that he inspires himself of the Bible.)"
},
"FIGREF1": {
"type_str": "figure",
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": "Jean conseille k son p~re d'acheter et ~t sa m~re d'utiliser un lave-vaisselle. (Jea~ advises his father to buy and his mother to use a dish washer.)"
},
"FIGREF2": {
"type_str": "figure",
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": ".s',~ .... <tll,t=l>^<t31,.,~,=a,~ {m [S,,b,:ot {}] ,t:~} [S,.,b~o,: {_-Y'~'}] ,[31 tS,,b~at {}J ,t\"4 tS,,boat {.\"-P}J, Analysis of d son pdre d'acheter et d sa m~re d'utiliser i) let a = S 1 V... V S p be an argument specification, and C = A~=I..., Cr be a composite category, then C satisfies ~ iff for each element of the composite category C,there exists one disjunct of e that matches it (iffVr e [1, z],gl E [1,p]/C, US z exists)."
},
"FIGREF3": {
"type_str": "figure",
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": "partial (~ # {}) or total (~ = {}) of saturated complements (*' = {}) total (~ = {}) of complements, the last being partially (~' # {}) or totally saturated (~' = {}) [Synsem,Cat[Subcat~U~'] ]]"
},
"FIGREF4": {
"type_str": "figure",
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": "...vsp >,..., < >} m-requirement, ~ nm requirement \u2022 ~ ----< Cll,...,C 1 > A...A < C[,...,Cqm > coordination of q m-tuples (if q > 1) or one m-tuple (if q = 1) of composite Synsem C/k = A,=I...~ C'~ \u2022 \u2022 or ~' must be empty Example of resulting analysis is given in figure 2 for the underlined phrase in (15): (15) Jean conseille & son p@re d'acheter et& sa m~re d'utiliser un lave-vaisselle. (Jean advises his father to buy and his mother to use a dish washer.)"
},
"FIGREF5": {
"type_str": "figure",
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": "Analysis of conseille ~ son p~re d'acheter et ~ sa m~re d'utiliser un lave-vaisselle 5 Conclusion"
},
"TABREF0": {
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"text": "3) Un livre int4ressant et que j'aurai du plaisir & lire. (An interesting book and which I will enjoy to read.) (4) Je demande & Pierre son v61o et & Marie sa canne & p~che. (I ask Peter for his bike and Mary for her fishing rod.) (5) Pierre vend un v61o et donne une canne k p~che g Marie. (Peter sells a bike and gives a fishing rod to Mary.)",
"num": null
},
"TABREF6": {
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"content": "<table><tr><td>Synserc* [VP]</td><td/><td/><td>J</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\">Pho. \\ ..... Synnern IVP[Subcat {NP}] ill\u00a2 & aon p~re d'acheter et i~ 8a rn~re dtutiliser\\]</td><td colspan=\"2\">[Phon \\un I ...... [Sy.$ern [Part NP]</td><td>issel/e\\] J</td></tr><tr><td>[Phon \\conseille\\ Part V</td><td>]</td><td colspan=\"2\">[Phon \\b son p~re dtacheter et b sa rn~re dS utiliser\\ .... <PP, t Subcat {NP}</td><td>] Co,.p,>',, J J</td></tr></table>",
"text": "Pho. \\conseille & son p~re dlacheter et h sa rn~re dlutiliser ur*lave--vaisselle\\]",
"num": null
}
}
}
} |