File size: 31,979 Bytes
6fa4bc9 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 | {
"paper_id": "P96-1048",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T09:02:54.833360Z"
},
"title": "Using textual clues to improve metaphor processing",
"authors": [
{
"first": "St6phane",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ferrari",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "LIMSI-CNRS",
"location": {
"postBox": "PO Box 133",
"postCode": "F-91403",
"settlement": "Orsay cSdex",
"country": "FRANCE"
}
},
"email": "ferrari@limsi.fr"
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "In this paper, we propose a textual clue approach to help metaphor detection, in order to improve the semantic processing of this figure. The previous works in the domain studied the semantic regularities only, overlooking an obvious set of regularities. A corpus-based analysis shows the existence of surface regularities related to metaphors. These clues can be characterized by syntactic structures and lexical markers. We present an object oriented model for representing the textual clues that were found. This representation is designed to help the choice of a semantic processing, in terms of possible non-literal meanings. A prototype implementing this model is currently under development, within an incremental approach allowing step-by-step evaluations. 1",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "P96-1048",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "In this paper, we propose a textual clue approach to help metaphor detection, in order to improve the semantic processing of this figure. The previous works in the domain studied the semantic regularities only, overlooking an obvious set of regularities. A corpus-based analysis shows the existence of surface regularities related to metaphors. These clues can be characterized by syntactic structures and lexical markers. We present an object oriented model for representing the textual clues that were found. This representation is designed to help the choice of a semantic processing, in terms of possible non-literal meanings. A prototype implementing this model is currently under development, within an incremental approach allowing step-by-step evaluations. 1",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Metaphor is a frequently used figure of speech, reflecting common cognitive processes. Most of the previous works in Natural Language Understanding (NLU) looked for regularities only on the semantic side of this figure, as shown in a brief overview in section 2. This resulted in complex semantic processings, not based on any previous robust detection, or requiring large and exhaustive knowledge bases. Our aim is to provide NLU systems with a set of heuristics for choosing the most adequate semantic processing, as well as to give some probabilistic clues for disambiguating the possibly multiple meaning representations.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "A corpus-based analysis we made showed the existence of textual clues in relation with the metaphors. These clues, mostly lexical markers combined with syntactic structures, are easy to spot, and can provide a first set of detection heuristics. We propose, in 1This work takes part in a research project sponsored by the AUPELF-UREF (Francophone Agency For Education and Research) section 3, an object oriented model for representing these clues and their properties, in order to integrate them in a NLU system. For each class, attributes give information for spoting the clues, and, when possible, the source and the target of the metaphor, using the results of a syntactic parsing. A prototype, STK, partially implementing the model, is currently under development, within an incremental approach. It is Mready used to evaluate the clues relevance.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "In conclusion, we will discuss how the model can help chosing the adequate semantic analysis to process at the sentence level or disambiguating multiple meaning representations, providing probabilities for non-literal meanings.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The classical NLU points of view of metaphor have pointed out the multiple kinds of relations between what is called the source and the target of the metaphor, but rarely discuss the problem of detecting the figure that bears the metaphor. For our purpose, we choose to present these approaches in two main groups, depending on how they initiate the semantic processing.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Classical methods: a brief overview",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "The previous works led to a classification introduced by Dan Fass (Fass, 1991) . In the comparison view, the metaphor corresponds to an analogy between the structures representing the source and the target of the figure, as in Gentner's works (Gentner, 1988) and their implementation (Falkenhainer et al., 1989) . The interaction view, as in Hobbs (Hobbs, 1991) , points at the novelty brought by the metaphor. Fass also distinguishes a selection restrictions violations view presenting the metaphor as a kind of anomaly. We would argue that the two previous views already considered metaphor as a kind of anomaly. Indeed, the semantic anMysis proposed for dealing with metaphors were processed depending on the results of another, say a \"classical\" one 2.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 66,
"end": 78,
"text": "(Fass, 1991)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 227,
"end": 258,
"text": "Gentner's works (Gentner, 1988)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 284,
"end": 311,
"text": "(Falkenhainer et al., 1989)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
},
{
"start": 348,
"end": 361,
"text": "(Hobbs, 1991)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Classical methods: a brief overview",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "2We prefer to call it a classical rather than literal meanings processing because it can deal with some conventional metaphors, even if not explicitly mentioned.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Classical methods: a brief overview",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "Thereby, detecting a metaphor meant detecting an anomaly in the meaning representation issued from such a classical analysis.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Classical methods: a brief overview",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "Fass proposed a method for discriminating literal meanings, metaphors, metonymies and \"anomalies\", merging different points of view (Fass, 1991) . In this approach, multiple semantic analysis can be processed, resulting in possibly multiple meaning representations. In (Prince and Sabah, 1992) , a method to overcome similar kinds of ambiguities reveal the difficulties encountered if no previous detection is made. James Martin's approach (Martin, 1992) , called the conventional view by Fass, is based on Lakoff's theory on cognitive metaphors (Lakoff and Johnson, 1980) . It requires a specific knowledge representation base and also results in multiple representation meanings. Detecting a metaphor is meaningless here, and conventional metaphoric meanings can be viewed as polysemies. Martin revealed at least that the heuristic of the ill-formness of meaning representations issued from classical analysis is not sufficient at all to deal with all the possible metaphors.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 132,
"end": 144,
"text": "(Fass, 1991)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 269,
"end": 293,
"text": "(Prince and Sabah, 1992)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
},
{
"start": 440,
"end": 454,
"text": "(Martin, 1992)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
},
{
"start": 546,
"end": 572,
"text": "(Lakoff and Johnson, 1980)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Classical methods: a brief overview",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "In our point of view, all the previous approaches were founded. The main remaining problem, however, is to choose an adequate processing when confronted with a metaphor, and thus, to detect the metaphors before trying to build their meaning representation. This can be partially solved using textual clues.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Classical methods: a brief overview",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "If the classical views of the metaphor overlook the textual clues, in other domains, especially those concerning explanation, they have been wisely reintroduced. In (Pery-Woodley, 1990), Pery-Woodley shows the existence of such clues related to the explanatory discourse. They can help in generating explanations in natural language as well as in modelling the student in a intelligent tutoring system (Daniel et al., 1992) . A corpus of 26 explanatory texts in French, of about 200 words each, has been collected under a shared research project between psychologists and computer scientists, in order to study metaphors and analogies in teaching. The analysis we made showed the existence of textual clues in relation with metaphoric contexts and analogies (e.g. \"like\", \"such as\", \"illustrated by\"). They can be characterized by syntactic regularities (e.g. the comparative is used in structures such as \"less than\", \"more than\"; the identification is made through attributes or appositions, ...). They also involve lexical markers (e.g. \"literMy\", \"illustrating\", \"metaphorically\" ,). These properties, already found in the previous works, can help detecting the clues themselves. Studying the relation between the syntactic regularities and the lexical markers, one can observe that the first build the ground where to find the second. We thus propose an object-oriented model for representing these clues. A generic textual clue can thereby be described by the two following attributes:",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 402,
"end": 423,
"text": "(Daniel et al., 1992)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Textual clues: object oriented description",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 the Surface Syntactic Pattern representing the syntactic regularity, with a label on the item where to find the lexical marker \u2022 the Lexical Marker itself Typically, the word \"metaphor\" itself can be used as a lexical marker in expressions such as '~to extend the conventional metaphor, pruning such a tree means to generalize\".",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Textual clues: object oriented description",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "On the other hand, \"metaphor\" will not be a marker if used as the subject of the sentence, like in this one. Thus, describing the syntactic regularities surrounding a lexical marker improves its relevance as a marker. We propose to represent this relevance for probabilistic purposes. Each clue that was found is currently evaluated on a large corpus (about 450,000 words). The frequencies of use of the lexical markers in metaphoric contexts are represented in the relevance attribute (see example below).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Textual clues: object oriented description",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "The syntactic structures may also give information about the source and the target of the metaphor. For instance, in the sentence \"Yesterday, at home, Peter threw himself on the dessert like a lion.\", the subject inherits the properties of speed and voracity of a lion attacking its victim. It is here possible to spot the source and the target of the metaphor using the syntactic properties of the comparison. Two attributes are added to textual clues related to metaphors, corresponding to the elements of the sentence bearing the source and the target. The model has been partially implemented in a tool, STK, for detecting the textual clues related to metaphors and adding specific marks when found. In its current version, STK allows us to tokenize, tag, and search for lexical markers on large corpora. The tagger we use is the one developped by Eric Brill (Brill, 1992) with a set of tags indicating the grammatical categories as well as other information such as the number and the gender for nouns and adjectives. It is evaluated under GRACE 3 protocol for corpus-oriented tools assigning grammatical categories. It is currently used for the evaluation of the textual clues that were found. The latter can be easily retrieved using STK, avoiding lexical ambiguities. They are then analyzed by hand, in order to determine their relevance attribute. In the previous example of textual clue, the relevance values are issued from this corpus-based analysis.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 863,
"end": 876,
"text": "(Brill, 1992)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Textual clues: object oriented description",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "Classical approaches to the metaphor in NLU revealed multiple underlying processes. We therefore focussed our study on how to help detecting metaphors in order to chose the most adequate semantic processing. Textual clues can give information about the figures that bear the metaphor, which are easy to spot. Indeed, they can be found using the results of syntactic parsing. We proposed an object-oriented model to represent these clues and their multiple properties. If textual clues give information about possible non-literal meanings, metaphors and analogies, one may argue they do not allow for a robust detection. Indeed, a textual clue is not sufficient to prove the presence of such figures of speech. The relevance of each clue can be used to help disambiguating multiple meaning representation when it occurs. This must not be the only disambiguation tool, but when no other is avalaible, it provides NLU systems with a probabilistic method.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion, perspectives",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "Our future works will focuss on the study of the relation between the metaphors introduced by a clue and others that are not conventional. The guideline is that novel metaphors not introduced by a clue at the sentence level may have been introduced previously in the text.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion, perspectives",
"sec_num": "4"
}
],
"back_matter": [],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS-92)",
"authors": [],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "608",
"issue": "",
"pages": "252--260",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "tique la Mod~lisation Cognitive de l']~l~ve. Lec- ture Notes in Computer Sciences, 608:252-260. Proceedings of the International Conference on In- telligent Tutoring Systems (ITS-92), MontrEal.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples",
"authors": [
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Falkenhainer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Forbus",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gentner",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1989,
"venue": "Artificial Intelligence",
"volume": "41",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--63",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K., and Gentner, D. (1989). The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algo- rithm and Examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41:1- 63.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "met : A Method for Discriminating Metonymy and Metaphor by Computer",
"authors": [
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fass",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1991,
"venue": "Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "17",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "49--90",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Fass, D. (1991). met : A Method for Discriminating Metonymy and Metaphor by Computer. Compu- tational Linguistics, 17(1):49-90.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Computational Approaches to Non-Literal Language",
"authors": [
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fass",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hinkelman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Martin",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1991,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Fass, D., Hinkelman, E., and Martin, J., editors. Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Computa- tional Approaches to Non-Literal Language, Syd- ney, Australia. 1991.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Analogical Inference and Analogical Access",
"authors": [
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gentner",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1988,
"venue": "In: Analogica, chapter",
"volume": "3",
"issue": "",
"pages": "63--88",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Gentner, D. (1988). Analogical Inference and Ana- logical Access, In: Analogica, chapter 3, pages 63-88. Edited by Prieditis A., Pitman Publish- ing, London, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., Los Altos, California.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "Metaphor and abduction",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hobbs",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fass",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1991,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "52--61",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hobbs, J. (1991). Metaphor and abduction. In (Fass et al., ), pages 52-61.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Metaphors we live by",
"authors": [
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lakoff",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Johnson",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1980,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, U.S.A.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "Computer Understanding of Conventional Metaphoric Language",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Martin",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1992,
"venue": "Cognitive Science",
"volume": "16",
"issue": "",
"pages": "233--270",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Martin, J. (1992). Computer Understanding of Con- ventional Metaphoric Language. Cognitive Sci- ence, 16:233-270.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "Textual clues for user modeling in an intelligent tutoring system",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pery-Woodley",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1990,
"venue": "Master's thesis",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Pery-Woodley, M. (1990). Textual clues for user modeling in an intelligent tutoring system. Mas- ter's thesis, University of Manchester, England, Great-Britain.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Coping with Vague and Fuzzy Words : A Multi-Expert Natural Language System which Overcomes Ambiguities",
"authors": [
{
"first": "V",
"middle": [],
"last": "Prince",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sabah",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1992,
"venue": "Acts of PRICAI'92",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Prince, V. and Sabah, G. (1992). Coping with Vague and Fuzzy Words : A Multi-Expert Natural Language System which Overcomes Ambiguities. In Acts of PRICAI'92, Seoul, Corea. September, 1992.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "A simple rule-based part of speech tagger",
"authors": [
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Brill",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1992,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Brill, E. (1992). A simple rule-based part of speech tagger. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, Trento. ACL.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Apport du style Linguis-3GRACE stands for \"Grammars and Resources for Corpora Analysis and their Evaluation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Daniel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nicaud",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "V",
"middle": [],
"last": "Prince",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pery-Woodley",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1992,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Daniel, M., Nicaud, L., Prince, V., and Pery- Woodley, M. (1992). Apport du style Linguis- 3GRACE stands for \"Grammars and Resources for Corpora Analysis and their Evaluation\". It is a national research project for the development of tools for French language processing.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"TABREF0": {
"num": null,
"content": "<table><tr><td colspan=\"2\">Example of textual clue representations</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">type metaphor-analogy</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">name B.2.2.2</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">comment comparison involving the meaning of a</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">marker, adjective, attribute of the object, object</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">before the verb</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">SSP GNo GN1 Vx Adjo [prep] GN2</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">LM Adjo: pareil (meaning \"similar\")</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">target GN1</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">source GN2</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">LM relevance (15/28)</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">number of occurrences 28</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">conventional metaphors 3</td></tr><tr><td>new</td><td>metaphors 2</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">metaphomc contexts 12</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">total 15</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">Notations:</td></tr></table>",
"text": "GN and GV stand for nominal or verbal groups, Adj and Adv for adjectives and adverbs, and prep for prepositions.",
"html": null,
"type_str": "table"
}
}
}
} |